FCC Web Documents citing 1.533

as compiled by hallikainen.com/FccRules on 2011 09 01

• http://transition.fcc.gov/ownership/roundtable_docs/waldfogel-b.pdf
  • 0.562 South -0.035 0.499 -2.749 0.966 -2.368 0.467 Percent Driving 7.933 4.593 5.026 8.891 2.162 4.298 R-squared .1780 .2957 .3762 N 162 162 162 44 Table 9: Do Listeners Value Group-Targeted Programming? (Race and Hispanic Status) White Listening Black Listening Non-Hisp. Listening Hisp. Listening OLS Estimates coef s.e. coef s.e. coef s.e. coef s.e. Constant 10.687 1.214 13.686 2.337 13.908 1.533 14.376 2.759 White-Targeted Stations 0.111 0.019 0.051 0.036 Black-Targeted Stations 0.045 0.051 0.298 0.098 Non-Hisp.-Targeted Stations -0.006 0.024 -0.064 0.043 Hispanic-Targeted Stations 0.054 0.048 0.238 0.085 Northeast 1.167 0.576 1.352 1.108 2.039 0.548 1.787 1.002 North Central 1.256 0.608 -0.314 1.171 1.737 1.044 1.008 1.933 South 0.617 0.607 0.372 1.168 -0.236 0.372 0.048 0.659 Percent Driving 3.024 2.385 3.464 4.592
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1997/fcc97403.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1997/fcc97403.txt http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1997/fcc97403.wp
  • difference is divided by the standard deviation of the mean difference, where the standard deviation is a measure of the variability in the data. Federal Communications Commission FCC 97-403 348 Rochester submitted data for only four years, and thus the corresponding one-tailed t statistic is 2.353. GTE submitted data for only five years, and thus the corresponding one-tailed t-statistic is 1.533. B-7 This statistic, calculated from the sample of paired observations, is then compared with the t statistic corresponding to a confidence level of 90 percent. The one-tailed t statistic with 5 degrees of freedom at the 90 percent confidence level is 1.476.348 This means that if a LEC has a t statistic -- calculated according to the formula above --
• http://www.fcc.gov/ownership/roundtable_docs/waldfogel-b.pdf
  • 0.562 South -0.035 0.499 -2.749 0.966 -2.368 0.467 Percent Driving 7.933 4.593 5.026 8.891 2.162 4.298 R-squared .1780 .2957 .3762 N 162 162 162 44 Table 9: Do Listeners Value Group-Targeted Programming? (Race and Hispanic Status) White Listening Black Listening Non-Hisp. Listening Hisp. Listening OLS Estimates coef s.e. coef s.e. coef s.e. coef s.e. Constant 10.687 1.214 13.686 2.337 13.908 1.533 14.376 2.759 White-Targeted Stations 0.111 0.019 0.051 0.036 Black-Targeted Stations 0.045 0.051 0.298 0.098 Non-Hisp.-Targeted Stations -0.006 0.024 -0.064 0.043 Hispanic-Targeted Stations 0.054 0.048 0.238 0.085 Northeast 1.167 0.576 1.352 1.108 2.039 0.548 1.787 1.002 North Central 1.256 0.608 -0.314 1.171 1.737 1.044 1.008 1.933 South 0.617 0.607 0.372 1.168 -0.236 0.372 0.048 0.659 Percent Driving 3.024 2.385 3.464 4.592
• http://transition.fcc.gov/ownership/roundtable_docs/waldfogel-b.pdf
  • 0.562 South -0.035 0.499 -2.749 0.966 -2.368 0.467 Percent Driving 7.933 4.593 5.026 8.891 2.162 4.298 R-squared .1780 .2957 .3762 N 162 162 162 44 Table 9: Do Listeners Value Group-Targeted Programming? (Race and Hispanic Status) White Listening Black Listening Non-Hisp. Listening Hisp. Listening OLS Estimates coef s.e. coef s.e. coef s.e. coef s.e. Constant 10.687 1.214 13.686 2.337 13.908 1.533 14.376 2.759 White-Targeted Stations 0.111 0.019 0.051 0.036 Black-Targeted Stations 0.045 0.051 0.298 0.098 Non-Hisp.-Targeted Stations -0.006 0.024 -0.064 0.043 Hispanic-Targeted Stations 0.054 0.048 0.238 0.085 Northeast 1.167 0.576 1.352 1.108 2.039 0.548 1.787 1.002 North Central 1.256 0.608 -0.314 1.171 1.737 1.044 1.008 1.933 South 0.617 0.607 0.372 1.168 -0.236 0.372 0.048 0.659 Percent Driving 3.024 2.385 3.464 4.592
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1997/fcc97403.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1997/fcc97403.txt http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1997/fcc97403.wp
  • difference is divided by the standard deviation of the mean difference, where the standard deviation is a measure of the variability in the data. Federal Communications Commission FCC 97-403 348 Rochester submitted data for only four years, and thus the corresponding one-tailed t statistic is 2.353. GTE submitted data for only five years, and thus the corresponding one-tailed t-statistic is 1.533. B-7 This statistic, calculated from the sample of paired observations, is then compared with the t statistic corresponding to a confidence level of 90 percent. The one-tailed t statistic with 5 degrees of freedom at the 90 percent confidence level is 1.476.348 This means that if a LEC has a t statistic -- calculated according to the formula above --
• http://www.fcc.gov/ownership/roundtable_docs/waldfogel-b.pdf
  • 0.562 South -0.035 0.499 -2.749 0.966 -2.368 0.467 Percent Driving 7.933 4.593 5.026 8.891 2.162 4.298 R-squared .1780 .2957 .3762 N 162 162 162 44 Table 9: Do Listeners Value Group-Targeted Programming? (Race and Hispanic Status) White Listening Black Listening Non-Hisp. Listening Hisp. Listening OLS Estimates coef s.e. coef s.e. coef s.e. coef s.e. Constant 10.687 1.214 13.686 2.337 13.908 1.533 14.376 2.759 White-Targeted Stations 0.111 0.019 0.051 0.036 Black-Targeted Stations 0.045 0.051 0.298 0.098 Non-Hisp.-Targeted Stations -0.006 0.024 -0.064 0.043 Hispanic-Targeted Stations 0.054 0.048 0.238 0.085 Northeast 1.167 0.576 1.352 1.108 2.039 0.548 1.787 1.002 North Central 1.256 0.608 -0.314 1.171 1.737 1.044 1.008 1.933 South 0.617 0.607 0.372 1.168 -0.236 0.372 0.048 0.659 Percent Driving 3.024 2.385 3.464 4.592
• http://transition.fcc.gov/ownership/roundtable_docs/waldfogel-b.pdf
  • 0.562 South -0.035 0.499 -2.749 0.966 -2.368 0.467 Percent Driving 7.933 4.593 5.026 8.891 2.162 4.298 R-squared .1780 .2957 .3762 N 162 162 162 44 Table 9: Do Listeners Value Group-Targeted Programming? (Race and Hispanic Status) White Listening Black Listening Non-Hisp. Listening Hisp. Listening OLS Estimates coef s.e. coef s.e. coef s.e. coef s.e. Constant 10.687 1.214 13.686 2.337 13.908 1.533 14.376 2.759 White-Targeted Stations 0.111 0.019 0.051 0.036 Black-Targeted Stations 0.045 0.051 0.298 0.098 Non-Hisp.-Targeted Stations -0.006 0.024 -0.064 0.043 Hispanic-Targeted Stations 0.054 0.048 0.238 0.085 Northeast 1.167 0.576 1.352 1.108 2.039 0.548 1.787 1.002 North Central 1.256 0.608 -0.314 1.171 1.737 1.044 1.008 1.933 South 0.617 0.607 0.372 1.168 -0.236 0.372 0.048 0.659 Percent Driving 3.024 2.385 3.464 4.592
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1997/fcc97403.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1997/fcc97403.txt http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1997/fcc97403.wp
  • difference is divided by the standard deviation of the mean difference, where the standard deviation is a measure of the variability in the data. Federal Communications Commission FCC 97-403 348 Rochester submitted data for only four years, and thus the corresponding one-tailed t statistic is 2.353. GTE submitted data for only five years, and thus the corresponding one-tailed t-statistic is 1.533. B-7 This statistic, calculated from the sample of paired observations, is then compared with the t statistic corresponding to a confidence level of 90 percent. The one-tailed t statistic with 5 degrees of freedom at the 90 percent confidence level is 1.476.348 This means that if a LEC has a t statistic -- calculated according to the formula above --
• http://www.fcc.gov/ownership/roundtable_docs/waldfogel-b.pdf
  • 0.562 South -0.035 0.499 -2.749 0.966 -2.368 0.467 Percent Driving 7.933 4.593 5.026 8.891 2.162 4.298 R-squared .1780 .2957 .3762 N 162 162 162 44 Table 9: Do Listeners Value Group-Targeted Programming? (Race and Hispanic Status) White Listening Black Listening Non-Hisp. Listening Hisp. Listening OLS Estimates coef s.e. coef s.e. coef s.e. coef s.e. Constant 10.687 1.214 13.686 2.337 13.908 1.533 14.376 2.759 White-Targeted Stations 0.111 0.019 0.051 0.036 Black-Targeted Stations 0.045 0.051 0.298 0.098 Non-Hisp.-Targeted Stations -0.006 0.024 -0.064 0.043 Hispanic-Targeted Stations 0.054 0.048 0.238 0.085 Northeast 1.167 0.576 1.352 1.108 2.039 0.548 1.787 1.002 North Central 1.256 0.608 -0.314 1.171 1.737 1.044 1.008 1.933 South 0.617 0.607 0.372 1.168 -0.236 0.372 0.048 0.659 Percent Driving 3.024 2.385 3.464 4.592
• http://transition.fcc.gov/ownership/roundtable_docs/waldfogel-b.pdf
  • 0.562 South -0.035 0.499 -2.749 0.966 -2.368 0.467 Percent Driving 7.933 4.593 5.026 8.891 2.162 4.298 R-squared .1780 .2957 .3762 N 162 162 162 44 Table 9: Do Listeners Value Group-Targeted Programming? (Race and Hispanic Status) White Listening Black Listening Non-Hisp. Listening Hisp. Listening OLS Estimates coef s.e. coef s.e. coef s.e. coef s.e. Constant 10.687 1.214 13.686 2.337 13.908 1.533 14.376 2.759 White-Targeted Stations 0.111 0.019 0.051 0.036 Black-Targeted Stations 0.045 0.051 0.298 0.098 Non-Hisp.-Targeted Stations -0.006 0.024 -0.064 0.043 Hispanic-Targeted Stations 0.054 0.048 0.238 0.085 Northeast 1.167 0.576 1.352 1.108 2.039 0.548 1.787 1.002 North Central 1.256 0.608 -0.314 1.171 1.737 1.044 1.008 1.933 South 0.617 0.607 0.372 1.168 -0.236 0.372 0.048 0.659 Percent Driving 3.024 2.385 3.464 4.592
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1997/fcc97403.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1997/fcc97403.txt http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1997/fcc97403.wp
  • difference is divided by the standard deviation of the mean difference, where the standard deviation is a measure of the variability in the data. Federal Communications Commission FCC 97-403 348 Rochester submitted data for only four years, and thus the corresponding one-tailed t statistic is 2.353. GTE submitted data for only five years, and thus the corresponding one-tailed t-statistic is 1.533. B-7 This statistic, calculated from the sample of paired observations, is then compared with the t statistic corresponding to a confidence level of 90 percent. The one-tailed t statistic with 5 degrees of freedom at the 90 percent confidence level is 1.476.348 This means that if a LEC has a t statistic -- calculated according to the formula above --
• http://www.fcc.gov/ownership/roundtable_docs/waldfogel-b.pdf
  • 0.562 South -0.035 0.499 -2.749 0.966 -2.368 0.467 Percent Driving 7.933 4.593 5.026 8.891 2.162 4.298 R-squared .1780 .2957 .3762 N 162 162 162 44 Table 9: Do Listeners Value Group-Targeted Programming? (Race and Hispanic Status) White Listening Black Listening Non-Hisp. Listening Hisp. Listening OLS Estimates coef s.e. coef s.e. coef s.e. coef s.e. Constant 10.687 1.214 13.686 2.337 13.908 1.533 14.376 2.759 White-Targeted Stations 0.111 0.019 0.051 0.036 Black-Targeted Stations 0.045 0.051 0.298 0.098 Non-Hisp.-Targeted Stations -0.006 0.024 -0.064 0.043 Hispanic-Targeted Stations 0.054 0.048 0.238 0.085 Northeast 1.167 0.576 1.352 1.108 2.039 0.548 1.787 1.002 North Central 1.256 0.608 -0.314 1.171 1.737 1.044 1.008 1.933 South 0.617 0.607 0.372 1.168 -0.236 0.372 0.048 0.659 Percent Driving 3.024 2.385 3.464 4.592
• http://transition.fcc.gov/ownership/roundtable_docs/waldfogel-b.pdf
  • 0.562 South -0.035 0.499 -2.749 0.966 -2.368 0.467 Percent Driving 7.933 4.593 5.026 8.891 2.162 4.298 R-squared .1780 .2957 .3762 N 162 162 162 44 Table 9: Do Listeners Value Group-Targeted Programming? (Race and Hispanic Status) White Listening Black Listening Non-Hisp. Listening Hisp. Listening OLS Estimates coef s.e. coef s.e. coef s.e. coef s.e. Constant 10.687 1.214 13.686 2.337 13.908 1.533 14.376 2.759 White-Targeted Stations 0.111 0.019 0.051 0.036 Black-Targeted Stations 0.045 0.051 0.298 0.098 Non-Hisp.-Targeted Stations -0.006 0.024 -0.064 0.043 Hispanic-Targeted Stations 0.054 0.048 0.238 0.085 Northeast 1.167 0.576 1.352 1.108 2.039 0.548 1.787 1.002 North Central 1.256 0.608 -0.314 1.171 1.737 1.044 1.008 1.933 South 0.617 0.607 0.372 1.168 -0.236 0.372 0.048 0.659 Percent Driving 3.024 2.385 3.464 4.592
• http://www.fcc.gov/ownership/roundtable_docs/waldfogel-b.pdf
  • 0.562 South -0.035 0.499 -2.749 0.966 -2.368 0.467 Percent Driving 7.933 4.593 5.026 8.891 2.162 4.298 R-squared .1780 .2957 .3762 N 162 162 162 44 Table 9: Do Listeners Value Group-Targeted Programming? (Race and Hispanic Status) White Listening Black Listening Non-Hisp. Listening Hisp. Listening OLS Estimates coef s.e. coef s.e. coef s.e. coef s.e. Constant 10.687 1.214 13.686 2.337 13.908 1.533 14.376 2.759 White-Targeted Stations 0.111 0.019 0.051 0.036 Black-Targeted Stations 0.045 0.051 0.298 0.098 Non-Hisp.-Targeted Stations -0.006 0.024 -0.064 0.043 Hispanic-Targeted Stations 0.054 0.048 0.238 0.085 Northeast 1.167 0.576 1.352 1.108 2.039 0.548 1.787 1.002 North Central 1.256 0.608 -0.314 1.171 1.737 1.044 1.008 1.933 South 0.617 0.607 0.372 1.168 -0.236 0.372 0.048 0.659 Percent Driving 3.024 2.385 3.464 4.592
• http://transition.fcc.gov/ownership/roundtable_docs/waldfogel-b.pdf
  • 0.562 South -0.035 0.499 -2.749 0.966 -2.368 0.467 Percent Driving 7.933 4.593 5.026 8.891 2.162 4.298 R-squared .1780 .2957 .3762 N 162 162 162 44 Table 9: Do Listeners Value Group-Targeted Programming? (Race and Hispanic Status) White Listening Black Listening Non-Hisp. Listening Hisp. Listening OLS Estimates coef s.e. coef s.e. coef s.e. coef s.e. Constant 10.687 1.214 13.686 2.337 13.908 1.533 14.376 2.759 White-Targeted Stations 0.111 0.019 0.051 0.036 Black-Targeted Stations 0.045 0.051 0.298 0.098 Non-Hisp.-Targeted Stations -0.006 0.024 -0.064 0.043 Hispanic-Targeted Stations 0.054 0.048 0.238 0.085 Northeast 1.167 0.576 1.352 1.108 2.039 0.548 1.787 1.002 North Central 1.256 0.608 -0.314 1.171 1.737 1.044 1.008 1.933 South 0.617 0.607 0.372 1.168 -0.236 0.372 0.048 0.659 Percent Driving 3.024 2.385 3.464 4.592
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1997/fcc97403.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1997/fcc97403.txt http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1997/fcc97403.wp
  • difference is divided by the standard deviation of the mean difference, where the standard deviation is a measure of the variability in the data. Federal Communications Commission FCC 97-403 348 Rochester submitted data for only four years, and thus the corresponding one-tailed t statistic is 2.353. GTE submitted data for only five years, and thus the corresponding one-tailed t-statistic is 1.533. B-7 This statistic, calculated from the sample of paired observations, is then compared with the t statistic corresponding to a confidence level of 90 percent. The one-tailed t statistic with 5 degrees of freedom at the 90 percent confidence level is 1.476.348 This means that if a LEC has a t statistic -- calculated according to the formula above --
• http://www.fcc.gov/ownership/roundtable_docs/waldfogel-b.pdf
  • 0.562 South -0.035 0.499 -2.749 0.966 -2.368 0.467 Percent Driving 7.933 4.593 5.026 8.891 2.162 4.298 R-squared .1780 .2957 .3762 N 162 162 162 44 Table 9: Do Listeners Value Group-Targeted Programming? (Race and Hispanic Status) White Listening Black Listening Non-Hisp. Listening Hisp. Listening OLS Estimates coef s.e. coef s.e. coef s.e. coef s.e. Constant 10.687 1.214 13.686 2.337 13.908 1.533 14.376 2.759 White-Targeted Stations 0.111 0.019 0.051 0.036 Black-Targeted Stations 0.045 0.051 0.298 0.098 Non-Hisp.-Targeted Stations -0.006 0.024 -0.064 0.043 Hispanic-Targeted Stations 0.054 0.048 0.238 0.085 Northeast 1.167 0.576 1.352 1.108 2.039 0.548 1.787 1.002 North Central 1.256 0.608 -0.314 1.171 1.737 1.044 1.008 1.933 South 0.617 0.607 0.372 1.168 -0.236 0.372 0.048 0.659 Percent Driving 3.024 2.385 3.464 4.592
• http://transition.fcc.gov/ownership/roundtable_docs/waldfogel-b.pdf
  • 0.562 South -0.035 0.499 -2.749 0.966 -2.368 0.467 Percent Driving 7.933 4.593 5.026 8.891 2.162 4.298 R-squared .1780 .2957 .3762 N 162 162 162 44 Table 9: Do Listeners Value Group-Targeted Programming? (Race and Hispanic Status) White Listening Black Listening Non-Hisp. Listening Hisp. Listening OLS Estimates coef s.e. coef s.e. coef s.e. coef s.e. Constant 10.687 1.214 13.686 2.337 13.908 1.533 14.376 2.759 White-Targeted Stations 0.111 0.019 0.051 0.036 Black-Targeted Stations 0.045 0.051 0.298 0.098 Non-Hisp.-Targeted Stations -0.006 0.024 -0.064 0.043 Hispanic-Targeted Stations 0.054 0.048 0.238 0.085 Northeast 1.167 0.576 1.352 1.108 2.039 0.548 1.787 1.002 North Central 1.256 0.608 -0.314 1.171 1.737 1.044 1.008 1.933 South 0.617 0.607 0.372 1.168 -0.236 0.372 0.048 0.659 Percent Driving 3.024 2.385 3.464 4.592
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1997/fcc97403.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1997/fcc97403.txt http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1997/fcc97403.wp
  • difference is divided by the standard deviation of the mean difference, where the standard deviation is a measure of the variability in the data. Federal Communications Commission FCC 97-403 348 Rochester submitted data for only four years, and thus the corresponding one-tailed t statistic is 2.353. GTE submitted data for only five years, and thus the corresponding one-tailed t-statistic is 1.533. B-7 This statistic, calculated from the sample of paired observations, is then compared with the t statistic corresponding to a confidence level of 90 percent. The one-tailed t statistic with 5 degrees of freedom at the 90 percent confidence level is 1.476.348 This means that if a LEC has a t statistic -- calculated according to the formula above --
• http://www.fcc.gov/ownership/roundtable_docs/waldfogel-b.pdf
  • 0.562 South -0.035 0.499 -2.749 0.966 -2.368 0.467 Percent Driving 7.933 4.593 5.026 8.891 2.162 4.298 R-squared .1780 .2957 .3762 N 162 162 162 44 Table 9: Do Listeners Value Group-Targeted Programming? (Race and Hispanic Status) White Listening Black Listening Non-Hisp. Listening Hisp. Listening OLS Estimates coef s.e. coef s.e. coef s.e. coef s.e. Constant 10.687 1.214 13.686 2.337 13.908 1.533 14.376 2.759 White-Targeted Stations 0.111 0.019 0.051 0.036 Black-Targeted Stations 0.045 0.051 0.298 0.098 Non-Hisp.-Targeted Stations -0.006 0.024 -0.064 0.043 Hispanic-Targeted Stations 0.054 0.048 0.238 0.085 Northeast 1.167 0.576 1.352 1.108 2.039 0.548 1.787 1.002 North Central 1.256 0.608 -0.314 1.171 1.737 1.044 1.008 1.933 South 0.617 0.607 0.372 1.168 -0.236 0.372 0.048 0.659 Percent Driving 3.024 2.385 3.464 4.592
• http://transition.fcc.gov/ownership/roundtable_docs/waldfogel-b.pdf
  • 0.562 South -0.035 0.499 -2.749 0.966 -2.368 0.467 Percent Driving 7.933 4.593 5.026 8.891 2.162 4.298 R-squared .1780 .2957 .3762 N 162 162 162 44 Table 9: Do Listeners Value Group-Targeted Programming? (Race and Hispanic Status) White Listening Black Listening Non-Hisp. Listening Hisp. Listening OLS Estimates coef s.e. coef s.e. coef s.e. coef s.e. Constant 10.687 1.214 13.686 2.337 13.908 1.533 14.376 2.759 White-Targeted Stations 0.111 0.019 0.051 0.036 Black-Targeted Stations 0.045 0.051 0.298 0.098 Non-Hisp.-Targeted Stations -0.006 0.024 -0.064 0.043 Hispanic-Targeted Stations 0.054 0.048 0.238 0.085 Northeast 1.167 0.576 1.352 1.108 2.039 0.548 1.787 1.002 North Central 1.256 0.608 -0.314 1.171 1.737 1.044 1.008 1.933 South 0.617 0.607 0.372 1.168 -0.236 0.372 0.048 0.659 Percent Driving 3.024 2.385 3.464 4.592
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1997/fcc97403.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1997/fcc97403.txt http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1997/fcc97403.wp
  • difference is divided by the standard deviation of the mean difference, where the standard deviation is a measure of the variability in the data. Federal Communications Commission FCC 97-403 348 Rochester submitted data for only four years, and thus the corresponding one-tailed t statistic is 2.353. GTE submitted data for only five years, and thus the corresponding one-tailed t-statistic is 1.533. B-7 This statistic, calculated from the sample of paired observations, is then compared with the t statistic corresponding to a confidence level of 90 percent. The one-tailed t statistic with 5 degrees of freedom at the 90 percent confidence level is 1.476.348 This means that if a LEC has a t statistic -- calculated according to the formula above --
• http://www.fcc.gov/ownership/roundtable_docs/waldfogel-b.pdf
  • 0.562 South -0.035 0.499 -2.749 0.966 -2.368 0.467 Percent Driving 7.933 4.593 5.026 8.891 2.162 4.298 R-squared .1780 .2957 .3762 N 162 162 162 44 Table 9: Do Listeners Value Group-Targeted Programming? (Race and Hispanic Status) White Listening Black Listening Non-Hisp. Listening Hisp. Listening OLS Estimates coef s.e. coef s.e. coef s.e. coef s.e. Constant 10.687 1.214 13.686 2.337 13.908 1.533 14.376 2.759 White-Targeted Stations 0.111 0.019 0.051 0.036 Black-Targeted Stations 0.045 0.051 0.298 0.098 Non-Hisp.-Targeted Stations -0.006 0.024 -0.064 0.043 Hispanic-Targeted Stations 0.054 0.048 0.238 0.085 Northeast 1.167 0.576 1.352 1.108 2.039 0.548 1.787 1.002 North Central 1.256 0.608 -0.314 1.171 1.737 1.044 1.008 1.933 South 0.617 0.607 0.372 1.168 -0.236 0.372 0.048 0.659 Percent Driving 3.024 2.385 3.464 4.592
• http://transition.fcc.gov/ownership/roundtable_docs/waldfogel-b.pdf
  • 0.562 South -0.035 0.499 -2.749 0.966 -2.368 0.467 Percent Driving 7.933 4.593 5.026 8.891 2.162 4.298 R-squared .1780 .2957 .3762 N 162 162 162 44 Table 9: Do Listeners Value Group-Targeted Programming? (Race and Hispanic Status) White Listening Black Listening Non-Hisp. Listening Hisp. Listening OLS Estimates coef s.e. coef s.e. coef s.e. coef s.e. Constant 10.687 1.214 13.686 2.337 13.908 1.533 14.376 2.759 White-Targeted Stations 0.111 0.019 0.051 0.036 Black-Targeted Stations 0.045 0.051 0.298 0.098 Non-Hisp.-Targeted Stations -0.006 0.024 -0.064 0.043 Hispanic-Targeted Stations 0.054 0.048 0.238 0.085 Northeast 1.167 0.576 1.352 1.108 2.039 0.548 1.787 1.002 North Central 1.256 0.608 -0.314 1.171 1.737 1.044 1.008 1.933 South 0.617 0.607 0.372 1.168 -0.236 0.372 0.048 0.659 Percent Driving 3.024 2.385 3.464 4.592
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1997/fcc97403.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1997/fcc97403.txt http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1997/fcc97403.wp
  • difference is divided by the standard deviation of the mean difference, where the standard deviation is a measure of the variability in the data. Federal Communications Commission FCC 97-403 348 Rochester submitted data for only four years, and thus the corresponding one-tailed t statistic is 2.353. GTE submitted data for only five years, and thus the corresponding one-tailed t-statistic is 1.533. B-7 This statistic, calculated from the sample of paired observations, is then compared with the t statistic corresponding to a confidence level of 90 percent. The one-tailed t statistic with 5 degrees of freedom at the 90 percent confidence level is 1.476.348 This means that if a LEC has a t statistic -- calculated according to the formula above --
• http://www.fcc.gov/ownership/roundtable_docs/waldfogel-b.pdf
  • 0.562 South -0.035 0.499 -2.749 0.966 -2.368 0.467 Percent Driving 7.933 4.593 5.026 8.891 2.162 4.298 R-squared .1780 .2957 .3762 N 162 162 162 44 Table 9: Do Listeners Value Group-Targeted Programming? (Race and Hispanic Status) White Listening Black Listening Non-Hisp. Listening Hisp. Listening OLS Estimates coef s.e. coef s.e. coef s.e. coef s.e. Constant 10.687 1.214 13.686 2.337 13.908 1.533 14.376 2.759 White-Targeted Stations 0.111 0.019 0.051 0.036 Black-Targeted Stations 0.045 0.051 0.298 0.098 Non-Hisp.-Targeted Stations -0.006 0.024 -0.064 0.043 Hispanic-Targeted Stations 0.054 0.048 0.238 0.085 Northeast 1.167 0.576 1.352 1.108 2.039 0.548 1.787 1.002 North Central 1.256 0.608 -0.314 1.171 1.737 1.044 1.008 1.933 South 0.617 0.607 0.372 1.168 -0.236 0.372 0.048 0.659 Percent Driving 3.024 2.385 3.464 4.592
• http://transition.fcc.gov/ownership/roundtable_docs/waldfogel-b.pdf
  • 0.562 South -0.035 0.499 -2.749 0.966 -2.368 0.467 Percent Driving 7.933 4.593 5.026 8.891 2.162 4.298 R-squared .1780 .2957 .3762 N 162 162 162 44 Table 9: Do Listeners Value Group-Targeted Programming? (Race and Hispanic Status) White Listening Black Listening Non-Hisp. Listening Hisp. Listening OLS Estimates coef s.e. coef s.e. coef s.e. coef s.e. Constant 10.687 1.214 13.686 2.337 13.908 1.533 14.376 2.759 White-Targeted Stations 0.111 0.019 0.051 0.036 Black-Targeted Stations 0.045 0.051 0.298 0.098 Non-Hisp.-Targeted Stations -0.006 0.024 -0.064 0.043 Hispanic-Targeted Stations 0.054 0.048 0.238 0.085 Northeast 1.167 0.576 1.352 1.108 2.039 0.548 1.787 1.002 North Central 1.256 0.608 -0.314 1.171 1.737 1.044 1.008 1.933 South 0.617 0.607 0.372 1.168 -0.236 0.372 0.048 0.659 Percent Driving 3.024 2.385 3.464 4.592
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1997/fcc97403.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1997/fcc97403.txt http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1997/fcc97403.wp
  • difference is divided by the standard deviation of the mean difference, where the standard deviation is a measure of the variability in the data. Federal Communications Commission FCC 97-403 348 Rochester submitted data for only four years, and thus the corresponding one-tailed t statistic is 2.353. GTE submitted data for only five years, and thus the corresponding one-tailed t-statistic is 1.533. B-7 This statistic, calculated from the sample of paired observations, is then compared with the t statistic corresponding to a confidence level of 90 percent. The one-tailed t statistic with 5 degrees of freedom at the 90 percent confidence level is 1.476.348 This means that if a LEC has a t statistic -- calculated according to the formula above --
• http://www.fcc.gov/ownership/roundtable_docs/waldfogel-b.pdf
  • 0.562 South -0.035 0.499 -2.749 0.966 -2.368 0.467 Percent Driving 7.933 4.593 5.026 8.891 2.162 4.298 R-squared .1780 .2957 .3762 N 162 162 162 44 Table 9: Do Listeners Value Group-Targeted Programming? (Race and Hispanic Status) White Listening Black Listening Non-Hisp. Listening Hisp. Listening OLS Estimates coef s.e. coef s.e. coef s.e. coef s.e. Constant 10.687 1.214 13.686 2.337 13.908 1.533 14.376 2.759 White-Targeted Stations 0.111 0.019 0.051 0.036 Black-Targeted Stations 0.045 0.051 0.298 0.098 Non-Hisp.-Targeted Stations -0.006 0.024 -0.064 0.043 Hispanic-Targeted Stations 0.054 0.048 0.238 0.085 Northeast 1.167 0.576 1.352 1.108 2.039 0.548 1.787 1.002 North Central 1.256 0.608 -0.314 1.171 1.737 1.044 1.008 1.933 South 0.617 0.607 0.372 1.168 -0.236 0.372 0.048 0.659 Percent Driving 3.024 2.385 3.464 4.592