FCC Web Documents citing 1.527
- http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-590A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-590A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-590A1.txt
- by reviewing the Commission's public statements, that the Station did not qualify for the exemption from this public file requirement. By its own admission, however, Licensee never undertook such a review until it became necessary to disclose the violation in its license renewal application. When the Commission first adopted the public file requirements for NCE stations in 1976, (as Section 1.527 of the Rules), it clearly explained that ``exempt licensees include those offering wholly instructional programming and those operating under Class D, 10-watt authorizations.'' Although Licensee is correct that Section 73.3527(e)(8) contains no definition of what is an ``exempt'' noncommercial educational broadcast station, the Commission has never issued any contrary ``public statements'' concerning what is an ``exempt'' licensee. The fact that
- http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-09-590A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-09-590A1.pdf
- by reviewing the Commission's public statements, that the Station did not qualify for the exemption from this public file requirement. By its own admission, however, Licensee never undertook such a review until it became necessary to disclose the violation in its license renewal application. When the Commission first adopted the public file requirements for NCE stations in 1976, (as Section 1.527 of the Rules), it clearly explained that ``exempt licensees include those offering wholly instructional programming and those operating under Class D, 10-watt authorizations.'' Although Licensee is correct that Section 73.3527(e)(8) contains no definition of what is an ``exempt'' noncommercial educational broadcast station, the Commission has never issued any contrary ``public statements'' concerning what is an ``exempt'' licensee. The fact that
- http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-590A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-590A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-590A1.txt
- by reviewing the Commission's public statements, that the Station did not qualify for the exemption from this public file requirement. By its own admission, however, Licensee never undertook such a review until it became necessary to disclose the violation in its license renewal application. When the Commission first adopted the public file requirements for NCE stations in 1976, (as Section 1.527 of the Rules), it clearly explained that ``exempt licensees include those offering wholly instructional programming and those operating under Class D, 10-watt authorizations.'' Although Licensee is correct that Section 73.3527(e)(8) contains no definition of what is an ``exempt'' noncommercial educational broadcast station, the Commission has never issued any contrary ``public statements'' concerning what is an ``exempt'' licensee. The fact that
- http://transition.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-09-590A1.doc http://transition.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-09-590A1.pdf
- by reviewing the Commission's public statements, that the Station did not qualify for the exemption from this public file requirement. By its own admission, however, Licensee never undertook such a review until it became necessary to disclose the violation in its license renewal application. When the Commission first adopted the public file requirements for NCE stations in 1976, (as Section 1.527 of the Rules), it clearly explained that ``exempt licensees include those offering wholly instructional programming and those operating under Class D, 10-watt authorizations.'' Although Licensee is correct that Section 73.3527(e)(8) contains no definition of what is an ``exempt'' noncommercial educational broadcast station, the Commission has never issued any contrary ``public statements'' concerning what is an ``exempt'' licensee. The fact that
- http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-590A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-590A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-590A1.txt
- by reviewing the Commission's public statements, that the Station did not qualify for the exemption from this public file requirement. By its own admission, however, Licensee never undertook such a review until it became necessary to disclose the violation in its license renewal application. When the Commission first adopted the public file requirements for NCE stations in 1976, (as Section 1.527 of the Rules), it clearly explained that ``exempt licensees include those offering wholly instructional programming and those operating under Class D, 10-watt authorizations.'' Although Licensee is correct that Section 73.3527(e)(8) contains no definition of what is an ``exempt'' noncommercial educational broadcast station, the Commission has never issued any contrary ``public statements'' concerning what is an ``exempt'' licensee. The fact that
- http://transition.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-09-590A1.doc http://transition.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-09-590A1.pdf
- by reviewing the Commission's public statements, that the Station did not qualify for the exemption from this public file requirement. By its own admission, however, Licensee never undertook such a review until it became necessary to disclose the violation in its license renewal application. When the Commission first adopted the public file requirements for NCE stations in 1976, (as Section 1.527 of the Rules), it clearly explained that ``exempt licensees include those offering wholly instructional programming and those operating under Class D, 10-watt authorizations.'' Although Licensee is correct that Section 73.3527(e)(8) contains no definition of what is an ``exempt'' noncommercial educational broadcast station, the Commission has never issued any contrary ``public statements'' concerning what is an ``exempt'' licensee. The fact that
- http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-590A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-590A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-590A1.txt
- by reviewing the Commission's public statements, that the Station did not qualify for the exemption from this public file requirement. By its own admission, however, Licensee never undertook such a review until it became necessary to disclose the violation in its license renewal application. When the Commission first adopted the public file requirements for NCE stations in 1976, (as Section 1.527 of the Rules), it clearly explained that ``exempt licensees include those offering wholly instructional programming and those operating under Class D, 10-watt authorizations.'' Although Licensee is correct that Section 73.3527(e)(8) contains no definition of what is an ``exempt'' noncommercial educational broadcast station, the Commission has never issued any contrary ``public statements'' concerning what is an ``exempt'' licensee. The fact that
- http://transition.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-09-590A1.doc http://transition.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-09-590A1.pdf
- by reviewing the Commission's public statements, that the Station did not qualify for the exemption from this public file requirement. By its own admission, however, Licensee never undertook such a review until it became necessary to disclose the violation in its license renewal application. When the Commission first adopted the public file requirements for NCE stations in 1976, (as Section 1.527 of the Rules), it clearly explained that ``exempt licensees include those offering wholly instructional programming and those operating under Class D, 10-watt authorizations.'' Although Licensee is correct that Section 73.3527(e)(8) contains no definition of what is an ``exempt'' noncommercial educational broadcast station, the Commission has never issued any contrary ``public statements'' concerning what is an ``exempt'' licensee. The fact that
- http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-590A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-590A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-590A1.txt
- by reviewing the Commission's public statements, that the Station did not qualify for the exemption from this public file requirement. By its own admission, however, Licensee never undertook such a review until it became necessary to disclose the violation in its license renewal application. When the Commission first adopted the public file requirements for NCE stations in 1976, (as Section 1.527 of the Rules), it clearly explained that ``exempt licensees include those offering wholly instructional programming and those operating under Class D, 10-watt authorizations.'' Although Licensee is correct that Section 73.3527(e)(8) contains no definition of what is an ``exempt'' noncommercial educational broadcast station, the Commission has never issued any contrary ``public statements'' concerning what is an ``exempt'' licensee. The fact that
- http://transition.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-09-590A1.doc http://transition.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-09-590A1.pdf
- by reviewing the Commission's public statements, that the Station did not qualify for the exemption from this public file requirement. By its own admission, however, Licensee never undertook such a review until it became necessary to disclose the violation in its license renewal application. When the Commission first adopted the public file requirements for NCE stations in 1976, (as Section 1.527 of the Rules), it clearly explained that ``exempt licensees include those offering wholly instructional programming and those operating under Class D, 10-watt authorizations.'' Although Licensee is correct that Section 73.3527(e)(8) contains no definition of what is an ``exempt'' noncommercial educational broadcast station, the Commission has never issued any contrary ``public statements'' concerning what is an ``exempt'' licensee. The fact that
- http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-590A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-590A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-590A1.txt
- by reviewing the Commission's public statements, that the Station did not qualify for the exemption from this public file requirement. By its own admission, however, Licensee never undertook such a review until it became necessary to disclose the violation in its license renewal application. When the Commission first adopted the public file requirements for NCE stations in 1976, (as Section 1.527 of the Rules), it clearly explained that ``exempt licensees include those offering wholly instructional programming and those operating under Class D, 10-watt authorizations.'' Although Licensee is correct that Section 73.3527(e)(8) contains no definition of what is an ``exempt'' noncommercial educational broadcast station, the Commission has never issued any contrary ``public statements'' concerning what is an ``exempt'' licensee. The fact that
- http://transition.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-09-590A1.doc http://transition.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-09-590A1.pdf
- by reviewing the Commission's public statements, that the Station did not qualify for the exemption from this public file requirement. By its own admission, however, Licensee never undertook such a review until it became necessary to disclose the violation in its license renewal application. When the Commission first adopted the public file requirements for NCE stations in 1976, (as Section 1.527 of the Rules), it clearly explained that ``exempt licensees include those offering wholly instructional programming and those operating under Class D, 10-watt authorizations.'' Although Licensee is correct that Section 73.3527(e)(8) contains no definition of what is an ``exempt'' noncommercial educational broadcast station, the Commission has never issued any contrary ``public statements'' concerning what is an ``exempt'' licensee. The fact that
- http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-590A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-590A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-590A1.txt
- by reviewing the Commission's public statements, that the Station did not qualify for the exemption from this public file requirement. By its own admission, however, Licensee never undertook such a review until it became necessary to disclose the violation in its license renewal application. When the Commission first adopted the public file requirements for NCE stations in 1976, (as Section 1.527 of the Rules), it clearly explained that ``exempt licensees include those offering wholly instructional programming and those operating under Class D, 10-watt authorizations.'' Although Licensee is correct that Section 73.3527(e)(8) contains no definition of what is an ``exempt'' noncommercial educational broadcast station, the Commission has never issued any contrary ``public statements'' concerning what is an ``exempt'' licensee. The fact that
- http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-590A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-590A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-590A1.txt
- by reviewing the Commission's public statements, that the Station did not qualify for the exemption from this public file requirement. By its own admission, however, Licensee never undertook such a review until it became necessary to disclose the violation in its license renewal application. When the Commission first adopted the public file requirements for NCE stations in 1976, (as Section 1.527 of the Rules), it clearly explained that ``exempt licensees include those offering wholly instructional programming and those operating under Class D, 10-watt authorizations.'' Although Licensee is correct that Section 73.3527(e)(8) contains no definition of what is an ``exempt'' noncommercial educational broadcast station, the Commission has never issued any contrary ``public statements'' concerning what is an ``exempt'' licensee. The fact that
- http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-09-590A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-09-590A1.pdf
- by reviewing the Commission's public statements, that the Station did not qualify for the exemption from this public file requirement. By its own admission, however, Licensee never undertook such a review until it became necessary to disclose the violation in its license renewal application. When the Commission first adopted the public file requirements for NCE stations in 1976, (as Section 1.527 of the Rules), it clearly explained that ``exempt licensees include those offering wholly instructional programming and those operating under Class D, 10-watt authorizations.'' Although Licensee is correct that Section 73.3527(e)(8) contains no definition of what is an ``exempt'' noncommercial educational broadcast station, the Commission has never issued any contrary ``public statements'' concerning what is an ``exempt'' licensee. The fact that
- http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-590A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-590A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-590A1.txt
- by reviewing the Commission's public statements, that the Station did not qualify for the exemption from this public file requirement. By its own admission, however, Licensee never undertook such a review until it became necessary to disclose the violation in its license renewal application. When the Commission first adopted the public file requirements for NCE stations in 1976, (as Section 1.527 of the Rules), it clearly explained that ``exempt licensees include those offering wholly instructional programming and those operating under Class D, 10-watt authorizations.'' Although Licensee is correct that Section 73.3527(e)(8) contains no definition of what is an ``exempt'' noncommercial educational broadcast station, the Commission has never issued any contrary ``public statements'' concerning what is an ``exempt'' licensee. The fact that
- http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-09-590A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-09-590A1.pdf
- by reviewing the Commission's public statements, that the Station did not qualify for the exemption from this public file requirement. By its own admission, however, Licensee never undertook such a review until it became necessary to disclose the violation in its license renewal application. When the Commission first adopted the public file requirements for NCE stations in 1976, (as Section 1.527 of the Rules), it clearly explained that ``exempt licensees include those offering wholly instructional programming and those operating under Class D, 10-watt authorizations.'' Although Licensee is correct that Section 73.3527(e)(8) contains no definition of what is an ``exempt'' noncommercial educational broadcast station, the Commission has never issued any contrary ``public statements'' concerning what is an ``exempt'' licensee. The fact that
- http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-590A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-590A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-590A1.txt
- by reviewing the Commission's public statements, that the Station did not qualify for the exemption from this public file requirement. By its own admission, however, Licensee never undertook such a review until it became necessary to disclose the violation in its license renewal application. When the Commission first adopted the public file requirements for NCE stations in 1976, (as Section 1.527 of the Rules), it clearly explained that ``exempt licensees include those offering wholly instructional programming and those operating under Class D, 10-watt authorizations.'' Although Licensee is correct that Section 73.3527(e)(8) contains no definition of what is an ``exempt'' noncommercial educational broadcast station, the Commission has never issued any contrary ``public statements'' concerning what is an ``exempt'' licensee. The fact that
- http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-09-590A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-09-590A1.pdf
- by reviewing the Commission's public statements, that the Station did not qualify for the exemption from this public file requirement. By its own admission, however, Licensee never undertook such a review until it became necessary to disclose the violation in its license renewal application. When the Commission first adopted the public file requirements for NCE stations in 1976, (as Section 1.527 of the Rules), it clearly explained that ``exempt licensees include those offering wholly instructional programming and those operating under Class D, 10-watt authorizations.'' Although Licensee is correct that Section 73.3527(e)(8) contains no definition of what is an ``exempt'' noncommercial educational broadcast station, the Commission has never issued any contrary ``public statements'' concerning what is an ``exempt'' licensee. The fact that