FCC Web Documents citing 1.46

as compiled by hallikainen.com/FccRules on 2012 07 01

• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2258A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2258A1.pdf
  • is ``appropriate given the compelling public interest in achieving accurate and reliable E911 location information.'' Accordingly, the Bureau cannot countenance the delay that would attend any extension of the reply comment filing deadline. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 5(c) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. �� 154(i), 154(j), 155(c), and sections 0.191, 0.392, and 1.46 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.191, 0.392, 1.46, the Motion for Extension of Time filed by the Rural Cellular Association and T-Mobile USA, Inc. IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Derek K. Poarch Chief, Public Safety and Homeland Security Bureau Comment Sought on Proposals Regarding Service Rules for Wireless Enhanced 911 Phase II Location Accuracy and Reliability, PS Docket
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-852A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-852A1.pdf
  • to strike portions of Houston's Statement of Position filed on June 3, 2008, alleging that Houston had improperly introduced new arguments and new evidence contrary to PSHSB's de novo review procedures. Houston opposed Sprint's request for confidentiality and motion to strike on June 19, 2008, and Sprint filed a reply to Houston's opposition on June 26, 2008. According to Section 1.46(a) of the Commission's rules, motions to accept late-filed pleadings are not to be granted routinely. The Bureau was explicit in its instructions that the parties were only to address designated issues specified in the extension, and that the mediation record would be closed after May 8, 2008. Accordingly, in rendering our decision in this dispute, we decline to consider any
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1357A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1357A1.pdf
  • the issues and that granting the extension of time requested by the Federal Reserve will serve the public interest. We therefore extend the reply comment deadline to September 3, 2010. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to Sections 4(i) and 4(j) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 154(i) and (j), and Sections 0.191, 0.392, and 1.46 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.191, 0.392, and 1.46, the request for extension of time filed by the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System IS GRANTED, and the deadline for filing reply comments in response to the Notice IS EXTENDED to September 3, 2010. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Jeffery M. Goldthorp Chief Communications Systems Analysis Division Public
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2267A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2267A1.pdf
  • these circumstances, the Bureau finds that the proposed extension of time will provide CSRIC working group members with the time to develop thorough recommendations for the CSRIC and meaningful comments in this proceeding. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 5(c) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. �� 154(i), 154(j), 155(c), and sections 0.191, 0.392, and 1.46 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.191, 0.392, 1.46, the Joint Request for Extension of Comment and Reply Comment Deadlines filed by the Association of Public-Safety Communications Officials - International, the National Emergency Number Association, the National Association of State 911 Administrators, CTIA - The Wireless Association, and the Telecommunications Industry Association, IS GRANTED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION James Arden
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-311A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-311A1.pdf
  • requested by NAB therefore serves the public interest. We therefore extend the comment deadline to Monday, March 15, 2010, and the reply comment deadline to Tuesday, April 13, 2010. 4. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to Sections 4(i) and 4(j) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 154(i) and (j), and Sections 0.191, 0.392, and 1.46 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.191, 0.392, and 1.46, the Motion for Extension of Time filed by the National Association of Broadcasters IS GRANTED, and the deadlines for filing comments and reply comments in response to the Second FNPRM ARE EXTENDED to March 15, 2010 and April 13, 2010, respectively. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION James Arden Barnett. Jr., Rear
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-576A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-576A1.pdf
  • informal request for Commission action. We therefore deny Smartcomm's motion and dismiss its opposition. We also dismiss the letter filed by Concepts to Operations, which was late-filed and does not reflect that it was served on Sprint. ordering clauseS Accordingly, pursuant to Section 4(i) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. � 154(i), and Sections 0.191, 0.392, 1.46 and 90.677 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.191, 0.392, 90.677, the Motion for Leave to File Opposition or for Acceptance as Informal Objection filed by Smartcomm, L.L.C IS DENIED. It is FURTHER ORDERED, that the Opposition to Sprint Nextel Corporation's Request for Waiver of its Obligation to Relinquish Channels in the Interleaved, Expansion and Guard Bands, filed by
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-664A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-664A1.pdf
  • the Third Report and Order and Fourth Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking. On April 8, 2011, the City of Charlotte, North Carolina (``Charlotte''), submitted an opposition to the Motion (``Opposition''). Charlotte urges the Commission to deny the Motion, arguing that the Motion is untimely, procedurally defective, and otherwise fails to establish a substantive basis for the requested extension. Under Section 1.46(a) of the Commission's rules, it is the policy of the Commission that extensions of time shall not be routinely granted. We do not find that the circumstances presented here warrant granting an extension. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, that the motion for extension filed by the Joint Filers is DENIED. This action is taken under delegated authority pursuant to Sections 0.191
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-11A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-11A1.pdf
  • has approved approximately 120 OVS certifications with some OVS operators now providing service. Broadband service providers (BSPs) are currently the only significant holders of OVS certifications or local OVS franchises, even though OVS is one of four statutorily-recognized options for local exchange carriers (LECs) to offer video programming services. As of June 2006, BSPs served approximately 1.4 million subscribers, representing 1.46 percent of all MVPD households. Among BSPs, however, those operating under the OVS framework are in the minority. The Commission does not have financial information regarding the entities authorized to provide OVS, some of which may not yet be operational. We thus believe that at least some of the OVS operators may qualify as small entities. Cable System Operators (Rate
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-12A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-12A1.pdf
  • has approved approximately 120 OVS certifications with some OVS operators now providing service. Broadband service providers (BSPs) are currently the only significant holders of OVS certifications or local OVS franchises, even though OVS is one of four statutorily-recognized options for local exchange carriers (LECs) to offer video programming services. As of June 2006, BSPs served approximately 1.4 million subscribers, representing 1.46 percent of all MVPD households. Among BSPs, however, those operating under the OVS framework are in the minority. The Commission does not have financial information regarding the entities authorized to provide OVS, some of which may not yet be operational. We thus believe that at least some of the OVS operators may qualify as small entities. Cable System Operators (Rate
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-10A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-10A1.txt
  • is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. 5. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the deadlines for filing comments and reply comments in this proceeding ARE EXTENDED to January 19, 2000, and February 18, 2000, respectively. 4 Id. at 2-3. 5 Opposition of Sprint to Request for Extension of Time, dated January 3, 2000 (Sprint Opposition). 6 47 C.F.R. � 1.46(a). 7 Local Competition Third Report and Order at para. 496. 8 Sprint Opposition at 1. 9 Id. at 1-2. Federal Communications Commission DA 00-10 3 6. This action is taken pursuant to authority found in section 4(i) and 303(r) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 154(i), 303(r), and sections 0.291 and 1.46 of the Commission's
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-1289A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-1289A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-1289A1.txt
  • not routinely grant motions for extension of time, we believe that Bergen has presented good cause for approval of such a motion. We therefore conclude that a grant of the Motion would be in the public interest. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to Section 4(i) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. � 154(i), and Section 1.46 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.46, the motion for extension of time to file a protest of the Order on Reconsideration and Order on Modification filed by the Bergen County, New Jersey Police Department on June 2, 2000, IS GRANTED. For the forgoing reasons, we hereby extend the time for filing a protest to the Order on Modification
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-1381A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-1381A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-1381A1.txt
  • above reference application. DIRECTV does not oppose the request. 2. We find it is in the public interest to grant the parties an extension of time in which to file comments on the above captioned application. Therefore, we extend the date to file comments on DIRECTV's application until July 6, 2000. This action is taken pursuant to Sections 0.51, 0.261, 1.46 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.51, 0.261, 1.46. 3. Accordingly, the State of Alaska and the State of Hawaii (the ``States'') Request for Extension of Time is GRANTED and the deadline for filing comments on the above captioned application is EXTENDED from June 23, 2000, until July 6, 2000. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Thomas S. Tycz Chief, Satellite and
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-1421A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-1421A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-1421A1.txt
  • weeks. 4. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that the Motion of the Personal Communications Industry Association for Extension of Time filed on June 19, 2000, IS GRANTED IN PART. Interested parties may file comments on or before July 19, 2000, and reply comments on or before August 3, 2000. 5. This action is taken pursuant to the authority provided in Section 1.46 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.46, and under delegated authority pursuant to Sections 0.131 and 0.331 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.131, 0.331. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Margaret Wiener Deputy Chief, Auctions and Industry Analysis Division Wireless Telecommunications Bureau See Amendment of the Commission's Rules to Establish New Personal Communications Services, Narrowband PCS, GEN Docket No. 90-314,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-1462A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-1462A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-1462A1.txt
  • all interested parties a greater opportunity to study the proposals and prepare more extensive comments, thus developing a comprehensive record. We find that this extension will not cause undue delay to the Commission's consideration of this proceeding. 3. Accordingly, pursuant to the authority of Section 4(j) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. � 154(j), and Section 1.46 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.46, IT IS ORDERED that the period of time for the filing of comments is EXTENDED from July 14, 2000, to August 2, 2000, and that the period of time for the filing of reply comments is EXTENDED from August 14, 2000, to September 1, 2000. Interested parties shall file comments and reply
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-1482A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-1482A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-1482A1.txt
  • and Order in this proceeding by November 29, 2000. Therefore, we designate July 14, 2000 and August 4, 2000 as the dates that comments and reply comments will be due, respectively. These new dates take into account the needs of the two groups' while, at the same time, recognizing the Commission's statutory deadline. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to Section 1.46 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. Section 1.46, that the Motions for an Extension of Time to file comments and reply comments filed by the Commercial and Noncommercial Broadcasters ARE GRANTED IN PART. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the deadline for filing comments in this proceeding IS EXTENDED until July 14, 2000 and the deadline for filing reply comments IS
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-1628A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-1628A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-1628A1.txt
  • thirty days is warranted and would provide interested parties sufficient time to respond to the Notice in the above-captioned proceeding. We therefore extend the period of time for filing comments to and including August 23, 2000, and we extend the period for filing reply comments to and including September 21, 2000. 4. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that pursuant to Section 1.46 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.46, the United States Coast Guard's request to extend the deadline for filing comments in this proceeding, filed July 14, 2000, is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART to the extent indicated. 5. This action is taken under delegated authority pursuant to Sections 0.131 and 0.331 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-1673A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-1673A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-1673A1.txt
  • petitions. Accordingly, we are establishing that common comment date as August 28, 2000, thereby extending the date for comments to be filed on the SIA Petition. This action is taken pursuant to authority found in Sections 4(i) and 303 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 154(i) and 303; and pursuant to Sections 0.31, 0.241, and 1.46 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.31, 0.241, and 1.46. For further information on these two petitions, contact Rodney Small, Office of Engineering and Technology, 202-418-2452 . See Report No. 2424. PUBLIC NOTICE Federal Communications Commission 445 12th St., S.W. Washington, D.C. 20554 News Media Information 202 / 418-0500 Fax-On-Demand 202 / 418-2830 TTY 202 / 418-2555 Internet: http://www.fcc.gov
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-1785A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-1785A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-1785A1.txt
  • 20554 In re Applications of CALIFORNIA WIRELESS, INC. For Renewal and Modification of Paging and Radiotelephone Service Stations KNKI691, KNKG857, KNKM824, and KNKO310 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) File Nos. 0000101622, 0000101628, 0000101646, and 0000101817 Adopted: August 4, 2000 Released: August 7, 2000 By the Chief, Commercial Wireless Division, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau: 1. Pursuant to section 1.46(c) of the Commission's rules, we have received three motions for extension of time in which to file pleadings in the above-captioned proceeding. California Wireless, Inc. (CW) filed a Consent Request for Extension of Time (Consent Request) from May 25, 2000 until June 16, 2000 to file an Opposition to the Petition to Deny the captioned applications filed by Link Two
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2395A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2395A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2395A1.txt
  • grant of a three week extension, we believe Nextel would not be prejudiced by the grant of a three week extension. In view of the foregoing, we conclude that granting the Motion would serve the public interest. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to Section 4(i) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. � 154(i), and Section 1.46 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.46, the Motion for Extension of Time filed by the State of Ohio on October 13, 2000, IS GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the deadline date for filing reply comments to the comments filed in the above-captioned matter pursuant to Public Notice, DA 00-2167, is November 7, 2000. This action is taken
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2521A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2521A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2521A1.txt
  • Commission released a Public Notice seeking comment in this proceeding and setting November 13, 2000 as the deadline for initial petitions/comments and November 27, 2000 as the deadline for oppositions/responses. Senator Hollings moves for a 30-day extension of the deadline to file comments in this proceeding. As discussed below, we grant Senator Hollings's Motion. II. Discussion 2. Pursuant to Section 1.46(b) of the Commission's rules, Senator Hollings requests that we grant a 30-day extension of the filing deadlines in this proceeding. Senator Hollings states that he has a keen interest in the outcome of this proceeding and plans to file comments. He further states that due to the pendency of critical legislative matters, however, he and his staff have not had
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2683A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2683A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2683A1.txt
  • more thorough record in this proceeding. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that the date for filing reply comments is extended to December 8, 2000. . This action is taken pursuant to authority found in Sections 4 (i) and 303 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 154 (i) and 303; and pursuant to Sections 0.31, 0.241 and 1.46 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.31, 0.241 and 1.46. For further information contact Geraldine Matise or Rodney Small, Office of Engineering and Technology, (202) 418-2322 or 418-2452, respectively; e-mail: gmatise@fcc.gov or rsmall@fcc.gov. Dale N. Hatfield Chief Office of Engineering and Technology See DA 00-2342. See ``Motion for 7-Day Extension of Time For Reply Comments.'' Id. at 1-2. Federal
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-271A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-271A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-271A1.txt
  • Deadline for Comments to SBC Communications Inc.'s and Nextel Communications, Inc.s' Request for Waiver of the Commission's Rules, DA 00-191, filed by NTCA on February 4, 2000; Request for Additional Time to File Comments, DA 00-191, filed by Advocacy on February 7, 2000; Request for Extension of Time, DA 00-191, filed by RCA on February 9, 2000. 47 C.F.R. � 1.46. To the extent that the Bankruptcy Court's February 7, 2000 order may have constrained the Commission in acting on SBC's and Nextel's petitions, the Second Circuit Court of Appeals' order of February 10, 2000 clarifies that the Commission may take this action. See ``Wireless Telecommunications Bureau Seeks Comment on Nextel Communications, Inc.'s Petition Regarding PCS C and F Block Spectrum;
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2720A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2720A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2720A1.txt
  • for extension of time filed by the Real Access Alliance in WT Docket No. 99-217 is GRANTED to the extent described above. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISION Jeffrey S. Steinberg Deputy Chief, Commercial Wireless Division Wireless Telecommunications Bureau The Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking in WT Docket No. 99-217 was issued on October 25, 2000 under FCC 00-366. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.46(a). __________________Federal Communications Commission DA 00-2720 �
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-273A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-273A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-273A1.txt
  • Incorporated's Petition for Declaratory Ruling Seeking 700 MHz Band License Pursuant to Ruling of U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals,'' Public Notice, DA 00-219 (rel. February 4, 2000). Id. Bell Atlantic Mobile, Inc., Emergency Motion for Extension of Time, filed February 9, 2000. U S WEST Wireless LLC, Emergency Motion for Extension of Time, filed February 10, 2000. 47 C.F.R. � 1.46. See ``Wireless Telecommunications Bureau Seeks Comment on QUALCOMM Incorporated's Petition for Declaratory Ruling Seeking 700 MHz Band License Pursuant to Ruling of U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals,'' DA 00-219 (rel. February 4, 2000). PUBLIC NOTICE Federal Communications Commission 445 12th St., S.W. Washington, D.C. 20554 News Media Information 202 / 418-0500 Fax-On-Demand 202 / 418-2830 TTY 202 / 418-2555 Internet:
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2800A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2800A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2800A1.txt
  • file reports on the status of their settlement negotiations on that date. In view of the foregoing, we believe it is in the public interest to extend the due date for Davis' response until January 16, 2001. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to Section 4(i) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. � 154(i), and Section 1.46 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.46, the Motion for Extension of Time filed by Davis Electronics, Inc. on October 5, 2000, and the Further Motion for Extension of Time filed by Davis Electronics, Inc. on November 30, 2000, ARE GRANTED to the extent that the time for Davis to file a response to District's Informal Petition Requesting Recission
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2866A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2866A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2866A1.txt
  • December 12, 2000, the Public Notice was published in the Federal Register, setting the comment deadline as December 27, 2000 and the reply comment deadline as January 11, 2001. Motion for Extension of Time filed by Allegiance Telecom, Inc., CC Docket No. 96-262 (filed Dec. 14, 2000). Id. at 1. Id. at 1. Id. at 2. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.46(a). See 47 C.F.R. �� 1.1200, 1206. PUBLIC NOTICE Federal Communications Commission 445 12th St., S.W. Washington, D.C. 20554 -- FCC -- News Media Information 202 / 418-0500 Fax-On-Demand 202 / 418-2830 TTY 202 / 418-2555 Internet: http://www.fcc.gov ftp.fcc.gov < = g � � � � +D�� +D`� +D`� �����PNG > �!�R>^��S�S߿�"K�k������er4 �J�dM�O�O � �,I TV��5 0�z̪�� ��� %�o� �� �
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2876A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2876A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2876A1.txt
  • Report until October 1, 2001. Unless we extend the time period for the attestation, the auditor will not have the results from the ARMIS 43-03 Report to review. Therefore, on our own motion, we grant Roseville an extension of time until January 15, 2002 to file its initial attestation report. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.46 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, and 1.46, that Roseville Telephone Company has an extension of time until January 15, 2002, to file its initial rule 64.904 CAM attestation report. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Kenneth P. Moran Chief, Accounting Safeguards Division ARMIS is an automated reporting system developed by the Commission for collecting financial, operating, service quality, and
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2877A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2877A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2877A1.txt
  • ARMIS Reports, we conclude that an extension of six months, until October 1, 2001, is sufficient. The attestation engagement cannot, under our current guidelines, take place until the ARMIS Reports are prepared; therefore, we are also granting an extension of time, until January 15, 2002, for filing the attestation report. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.46 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, and 1.46, that the CenturyTel, Inc. and CenturyTel of Washington, Inc. request for an extension of time to file its initial ARMIS reports and file a CAM attestation report is GRANTED, as described above. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Kenneth P. Moran Chief, Accounting Safeguards Division Century is a mid-sized carrier. A mid-sized
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2878A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2878A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2878A1.txt
  • March 20, 2000, Embratel filed a motion to extend the due date for its reply from March 23 to March 31, 2000. Embratel explained that it needed additional time to address complex coordination issues raised in PanAmSat's opposition. It is the policy of the Commission that motions for extension of time shall not be routinely granted. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.46(a). Nevertheless, because considering Embratel's reply would not prejudice any other party in this proceeding, we verbally granted Embratel's motion on March 22, 2000. This Order confirms that grant. DISCO II, 12 FCC Rcd at 24107-56 (paras. 30-145). DISCO II, 12 FCC Rcd at 24157-59 (paras. 146-50). DISCO II, 12 FCC Rcd at 24159-69 (paras. 151-74). DISCO II, 12 FCC Rcd
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2883A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2883A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2883A1.txt
  • extension, and to avoid any prejudice to the other 2 GHz MSS applicants and LOI filers who are preparing replies, we extend the deadline for all parties filing replies to January 16, 2001. This action is taken pursuant to authority found in Section 4(i) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. � 154(i), and Sections 0.261 and 1.46 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.261 and 1.46. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, that the Motion for Extension of Time filed by The Boeing Company IS GRANTED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Thomas S. Tycz Chief Satellite and Radiocommunication Division International Bureau Federal Communications Commission DA 00-2883 � � � �
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-374A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-374A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-374A1.txt
  • were we to accept Desert's Petition, we would find it moot. In another proceeding, after considering and rejecting arguments identical to those raised by Desert in its Petition here, we granted Mineral's application. III. Ordering Clause 5. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to Section 4(i) of the Communications Act, as amended, 47 U.S.C. � 154(i), and sections 0.331 and 1.46(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.331 and 1.46(a), the Motion filed by Desert on December 30, 1994, is DENIED. 6. IT IS ALSO ORDERED that, pursuant to Sections 4(i) and 309(d), of the Communications Act, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 154(i) and 309(d), and sections 0.331 and 22.130(c) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.331 and 22.130(c),
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-501A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-501A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-501A1.txt
  • our rules do not provide for routine grants of extensions of time, we agree that WTC should be given extra time to respond under these circumstances and hereby grant WTC's request to extend the time for filing oppositions to the petitions for reconsideration in this matter to March 6, 2000. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 0.131, 0.331 and 1.46 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.131, 0.331, 1.46, that the Motion for Extension of Time, filed by Wilmington Trust Company, IS GRANTED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION William W. Kunze Deputy Chief Commercial Wireless Division Wireless Telecommunications Bureau See 47 C.F.R. � 1.106(f). See 47 C.F.R. � 1.46(a). Federal Communications Commission DA 00-501 - Federal Communications Commission DA 00-501 ]
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-9A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-9A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-9A1.txt
  • extensions of time, we find that a brief extension in this case is warranted. Therefore, we will grant the extension request and extend the deadline for filing oppositions to January 18, 2000. 4. This action is taken pursuant to authority found in Section 4(i) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. � 154(i), and Sections 0.261 and 1.46 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.261 and 1.46. 5. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, that the Motion for Extension of Time filed by the American Distance Education Consortium IS GRANTED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Thomas S. Tycz Chief, Satellite and Radiocommunication Division International Bureau (continued....) Federal Communications Commission Federal Communications Commission DA 00-9 @& �'��
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1013A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1013A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1013A1.txt
  • many issues regarding geosynchronous orbit (GSO) satellite use of the Ku-band in the fixed-satellite service (FSS), and those parties need an additional 30 days to reach agreement. SIA also requests that all interested parties be allowed to file replies on or before May 23, 2001. The Commission does not routinely grant motions for extension of time. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.46(a). We conclude, however, that SIA's efforts to develop a consensus approach to Ku-band GSO FSS issues may facilitate the resolution of those issues, and so may further the public interest. Accordingly, we will allow all interested parties in this proceeding some additional time to file replies. However, we find that 14 days, rather the requested 30 days, is sufficient time
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1041A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1041A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1041A1.txt
  • Eschelon Telecom, Inc., Intermedia Communications, Inc., KMC Telecom Inc., Local Telephone and Data Services, Network Telephone Corporation, Network Access Solutions, New Edge Network, Inc., NewSouth Communications, Inc., NuVox Inc., Pac-West Telecomm, Inc., RCN Telecom Services, Inc., US LEC Communications Inc., and WorldCom, Inc., CC Docket No. 96-98 (filed Apr. 19, 2001) (Joint Motion). Joint Motion at 2-3. 47 C.F.R. � 1.46(a). 47 C.F.R. � 1.1206. PUBLIC NOTICE Federal Communications Commission 445 12th St., S.W. Washington, D.C. 20554 News Media Information 202 / 418-0500 Fax-On-Demand 202 / 418-2830 TTY 202 / 418-2555 Internet: http://www.fcc.gov ftp.fcc.gov T U W (R) � � � S T � S T � �� ����PNG RR�~R�n� |�o� |�o� X*�N�*K � ~j0tm@"Iu�� �2~��y=��b��"���05 X� ?''z[�'';: ''@�/'", �Z!� g$!���H
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1199A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1199A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1199A1.txt
  • Washington, D.C. 20554 In the Matter of Reallocation and Service Rules for the 698-746 MHz Spectrum Band (Television Channels 52-59) ) ) ) ) Adopted: May 11, 2001 Released: May 11, 2001 By the Deputy Chief, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau; Acting Chief, Office of Engineering and Technology: On May 7, 2001, Paxson Communications Corporation (``Paxson'') filed a motion, pursuant to Section 1.46 of the Commission's Rules, to extend the period for filing comments and reply comments to the Notice of Proposed Rulemaking in the above-captioned proceeding until after completion of the auction for licenses in the Upper 700 MHz Band (Channels 60-69) or, in the alternative, until after the Commission has ruled on the Petitions for Reconsideration of the Third Report and
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1306A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1306A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1306A1.txt
  • the date for filing comments in this proceeding IS EXTENDED to June 12, 2001, and the date for filing reply comments IS EXTENDED to June 22, 2001. This action is taken pursuant to delegated authority found in Sections 4(i) and 303(r) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. Sections 154(i) and 303(r), and Section 0.204(b), 0.283 and 1.46 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. Sections 0.204(b), 0.283, and 1.46. Commenters must file an original and four copies of all comments and reply comments to the Commission's Secretary: Magalie Roman Salas, Office of the Secretary, Federal Communications Commission, 445 12th St., SW, Room TW-A325, Washington, D.C. 20554. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Roy J. Stewart Chief, Mass Media Bureau Federal Communications
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1339A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1339A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1339A1.txt
  • for Extension of Time IS GRANTED TO THE EXTENT INDICATED HEREIN. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION William H. Johnson Deputy Chief Cable Services Bureau 47 U.S.C. �224. 47 C.F.R. ��1.1401-1.1418. 47 C.F.R. � 1.1407(a). 47 U.S.C. � 224(b)(1) and (2). 47 U.S.C. �224 (b) (1). 47 U.S.C. � 224(b)(1). 47 C.F.R. �1.1407(a). Id. 47 C.F.R. �1.1411. 47 C.F.R. �1.1409(a). 47 C.F.R. � 1.46(a). Federal Communications Commission DA 01-1339 Federal Communications Commission DA 01-1339 � � � � � � � � �0� �0� �0� �0� �0� �0� �0� �`� �0�
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1470A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1470A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1470A1.txt
  • ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ET Docket No. 01-75 RM-9418 RM-9856 ORDER GRANTING EXTENSION OF TIME Adopted: June 20, 2001 Released: June 21, 2001 By the Acting Chief, Office of Engineering and Technology: On June 15, 2001, the Association for Maximum Service Television, Inc. (MSTV) filed a motion pursuant to Section 1.46 of the Commission's Rules, to extend the period for filing comments and reply comments to the Notice of Proposed Rule Making, in the above captioned proceeding from June 25, 2001, and July 24, 2001, to July 25, 2001, and August 24, 2001, respectively. MSTV states that the additional time is required to allow adequate time to conduct a thorough review
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1472A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1472A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1472A1.txt
  • Reference Information Center. Accordingly, interested parties may now file reply comments on or before June 28, 2001. For further information contact Cathy Carpino, Policy and Program Planning Division, Common Carrier Bureau, at (202) 418-1580 or ccarpino@fcc.gov. -FCC- Letter from Gordon R. Evans, Vice President, Federal Regulatory, Verizon, to Magalie Roman Salas, Secretary, FCC (May 1, 2001). See 47 C.F.R. � 1.46(a). PUBLIC NOTICE Federal Communications Commission 445 12th St., S.W. Washington, D.C. 20554 News Media Information 202 / 418-0500 Fax-On-Demand 202 / 418-2830 TTY 202 / 418-2555 Internet: http://www.fcc.gov ftp.fcc.gov Z [ ^ a l m x y � � � � � � � � � � �� �0� Z w x z { | }  � � �
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1545A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1545A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1545A1.txt
  • of resolving the differences between the parties. Port Authority reports that counsel for Jersey City does not object to the Motion. In view of the foregoing, we conclude that granting the Motion would serve the public interest. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to Section 4(i) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. � 154(i), and Section 1.46 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.46, the Motion for Extension of Time filed by the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey on June 26, 2001, IS GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the deadline date for filing comments filed in the above-captioned matter pursuant to the Public Notice, DA 01-1422, is July 20, 2001, and the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1646A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1646A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1646A1.txt
  • will provide ACS with enough time to file an accurate CAM. The January CAM filing date will not affect other related reporting requirements, and thus causes no harm to the public interest. We, therefore, grant ACS an extension of time until January 16, 2002 to file its initial CAM. 4. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to Sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.46 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, and 1.46, that ACS's request for an extension of time until January 16, 2002, to file its initial cost allocation manual IS GRANTED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Kenneth P. Moran Chief, Accounting Safeguards Division 47 C.F.R. � 64.903(a). See 47 C.F.R. �1.46(a). Federal Communications Commission DA 01-1646 Federal Communications Commission DA 01-1646
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1656A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1656A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1656A1.txt
  • to respond is a sufficient amount of time to meet this goal. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that Mpower's Motion for Extension of Time IS DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this action is taken pursuant to authority found in section 4(i) and 303(r) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 154(i), 303(r), and sections 0.291 and 1.46 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.291, 1.46. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Michelle M. Carey Chief, Policy and Program Planning Division Common Carrier Bureau Pleading Cycle Established for Comments on Mpower Petition for Forbearance and Rulemaking, Public Notice, DA 01-1348 (June 4, 2001). Motion for Extension of Time filed by Mpower Communications Corp., CC Docket No. 01-117 (filed June 14,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1744A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1744A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1744A1.txt
  • facilitate discussion between the parties representing Port Authority and Jersey City, with the hope of resolving the differences between the parties. In view of the foregoing, we conclude that granting the Motion would serve the public interest. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to Section 4(i) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. � 154(i), and Section 1.46 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.46, the Joint Motion for Extension of Time filed by the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey and the Jersey City, New Jersey, Police Department on July 19, 2001, IS GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the deadline date for filing comments filed in the above-captioned matter pursuant to the Public
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1924A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1924A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1924A1.txt
  • of the foregoing, we conclude that granting the instant Joint Motion would serve the public interest. We note, however, that we do not contemplate granting any further extensions of the time for filing comments in this proceeding. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to Section 4(i) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. � 154(i), and Section 1.46 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.46, the Joint Motion for Extension of Time filed by the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey and the Jersey City, New Jersey, Police Department on August 10, 2001, IS GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the deadline date for filing comments filed in the above-captioned matter pursuant to the Public
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1933A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1933A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1933A1.txt
  • August 13, 2001 INTERNATIONAL BUREAU GRANTS MOTION FOR LIMITED EXTENSION OF TIME FOR FILING COMMENTS AND REPLY COMMENTS ON PETITION OF ATLANTIC TELE-NETWORK FOR WAIVER OF THE BENCHMARK SETTLEMENT RATE FOR GUYANA IB Docket No. 96-261 On August 7, 2001, Caribbean Wireless Telecom, LLC, (CWT) a U.S. company registered to do business in Guyana, filed a motion, pursuant to Section 1.46 of the Commission's Rules to extend the period for filing comments and reply comments to a Petition of Atlantic Tele-Network, Inc. (ATN) for a Waiver of the Benchmark Settlement Rate for Guyana. CWT requests an extension of sixty days in which to file comments. The deadline for filing comments was August 14, 2001. Caribbean Telecommunications filed comments in support of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2090A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2090A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2090A1.txt
  • dates absent extraordinary circumstances. PanAmSat has presented none. We therefore find that it is not in the public interest to grant PanAmSat the one-week extension it requests. This decision is made pursuant to the authority found in Sections 4(i) and 303 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 154(i), 303; and pursuant to Sections 0.51, 0.261, 1.46 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.51, 0.261, 1.46. Accordingly, PanAmSat's request for an extension of time in which to file comments is DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Thomas S. Tycz Chief, Satellite and Radiocommunication Division, International Bureau 47 U.S.C. � 763(5). Id. Public Notice, Report No. SAT-00081 (Aug. 28, 2001). See Public Notice, Report No. SAT-MSC-20010405-00029, April 12, 2001;
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2104A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2104A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2104A1.txt
  • Thursday September 6, 2001 INTERNATIONAL BUREAU GRANTS MOTION FOR LIMITED EXTENSION OF TIME FOR FILING REPLY COMMENTS ON PETITION OF ATLANTIC TELE-NEWORK FOR WAIVER OF THE BENCHMARK SETTLEMENT RATE FOR GUYANA IB Docket No. 96-261 On August 30, 2001, Caribbean Wireless Telecom, LLC, (CWT) a U.S. company registered to do business in Guyana, filed a second motion, pursuant to Section 1.46 of the Commission's Rules to extend the period for filing comments and reply comments to a Petition of Atlantic Tele-Network, Inc. (ATN) for a Waiver of the Benchmark Settlement Rate for Guyana. CWT requests an extension until September 28, 2001 in which to file comments and reply comments. The original deadlines for filing initial comments and reply comments were August
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2188A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2188A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2188A1.txt
  • the filed comments in this docket, we find that providing the movant and others an additional month to respond provides a necessary and sufficient amount of time to formulate meaningful responses. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to authority found in section 4(i) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. � 154(i), and sections 0.91, 0.291 and 1.46 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.46, USTA's Motion for Extension of Time IS GRANTED IN PART to establish a new reply comments deadline of November 5, 2001. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Jane E. Jackson Chief, Competitive Pricing Division Common Carrier Bureau In the Matter of Developing a Unified Intercarrier Compensation Regime, CC Docket No. 01-92, Notice of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2282A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2282A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2282A1.txt
  • to Deny. See GEC Partners, LLP Opposition to Petition to Deny, filed May 8, 2001 (Opposition). GEC filed motions for extension of time to file an opposition on April 30, 2001, and May 4, 2001. After reviewing the motions, we find that GEC had good cause for the requested extensions and we grant the motions pursuant to 47 C.F.R. � 1.46. See TRW, Inc., Reply to Opposition, filed May 18, 2001 (Reply). Petition to Deny at 1 n.1. Id. at n.1, 2-3. Id. at 3, Reply at 3-4. Petition at 4. Id. See Opposition. Id. at 1, 5, citing 47 C.F.R. � 101.17. 47 C.F.R. � 1.925(b)(3). See Application of KIRV Radio, Memorandum Opinion and Order, 50 FCC 2d 1010 �
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2313A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2313A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2313A1.txt
  • balances the interests of commenting parties without unreasonably delaying the resolution of the proceeding. Therefore, we grant an extension of time for the filing of comments from October 11, 2001 to October 19, 2001. In addition, we extend the filing of reply comments period from October 25, 2001 to November 5, 2001. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that pursuant to Section 1.46 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.46, the request of CTIA to extend the deadline for filing comments in this proceeding, filed September 25, 2001, is GRANTED to the extent indicated. This action is taken under delegated authority pursuant to Sections 0.131 and 0.331 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.131, 0.331. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Kathleen O'Brien Ham
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2314A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2314A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2314A1.txt
  • Service ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) IB Docket No. 01-185 Adopted: October 4, 2001 Released: October 4, 2001 Comment Date: October 19, 2001 Reply Comment Date: November 5, 2001 By the Chief, Planning & Negotiations Division, International Bureau: On September 25, 2001, Cellular Telephone & Internet Association (CTIA) filed a motion, pursuant to Section 1.46 of the Commission's rules, to extend the period for filing comments and reply comments to the Notice of Proposed Rule Making in the above-captioned proceeding. The motion requests a two-week extension of time - from October 11, 2001, to October 25, 2001 - in which to submit comments in the above-captioned proceeding. For the reasons discussed below, we grant CTIA's
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2395A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2395A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2395A1.txt
  • argument. Century should receive an extension until after the Commission rules on the broader issues raised in CC Docket No. 00-199. We therefore conclude that an additional extension of three months, until January 1, 2002 for the ARMIS Reports and April 15, 2002 for the CAM attestation report, is sufficient. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.46 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, and 1.46, that the CenturyTel, Inc. and CenturyTel of Washington, Inc. request for additional extension of time is GRANTED and CenturyTel, Inc. and CenturyTel of Washington, Inc. has an extension of time until January 1, 2002, to file its initial ARMIS Reports and until April 15, 2002 to file its initial
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2396A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2396A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2396A1.txt
  • argument. Roseville should receive an extension until after the Commission rules on the broader issues raised in CC Docket No. 00-199. We therefore conclude that an additional extension of three months, until January 1, 2002 for the ARMIS Reports and April 15, 2002 for the CAM attestation report, is sufficient. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.46 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, and 1.46, that the Roseville Telephone Company request for additional extension of time is GRANTED and Roseville Telephone Company has an extension of time until January 1, 2002, to file its initial ARMIS Reports and until April 15, 2002 to file its initial rule 64.904 CAM attestation report. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2402A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2402A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2402A1.txt
  • of DIRECTV's counsel in Washington, D.C. DIRECTV claims further that learned of Hawaii's opposition through Commission staff. DIRECTV Motion at 1. DIRECTV request permission to file its opposition to Hawaii's petition on August 10, 2001. DIRECTV Motion at 1. It is the policy of the Commission that motions for extension of time shall not be granted routinely. 47 C.F.R. � 1.46(a). However, in this case, we conclude that DIRECTV has provided sufficient justification, and we grant its requested extension. Northpoint Petition 1-2. Letter from J.C. Rozendaal, Counsel for Northpoint, to Magalie Roman Salas, Secretary, Secretary, FCC (dated Sept. 14, 2001). Region 2 includes North, South, and Central America. Unless referring specifically to the Region 2 BSS Plan and its associated Feeder
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2532A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2532A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2532A1.txt
  • filing location for paper documents. We find that providing TCI and others an additional ten days to respond provides a necessary and sufficient amount of time to formulate meaningful responses. 4. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to authority found in section 4(i) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. � 154(i), and sections 0.91, 0.291 and 1.46 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.46, Thrifty Call, Inc.'s Request for an Extension of Time IS GRANTED to establish a new reply comments deadline of November 8, 2001. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Jane E. Jackson Chief, Competitive Pricing Division Common Carrier Bureau Public Notice, Thrifty Call Files Petition for Declaratory Ruling Pleading Cycle Established, DA 01-2200, (Com.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2533A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2533A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2533A1.txt
  • of time is appropriate under the current circumstances. We believe that a three-day extension of time appropriately balances the interests of commenting parties without unreasonably delaying the resolution of the proceeding. Therefore, we grant an extension of time for the filing of reply comments from November 5, 2001 to November 8, 2001. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that pursuant to Section 1.46 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.46, the October 26, 2001 request of CTIA to extend the deadline for filing reply comments in this proceeding is GRANTED. This action is taken under delegated authority pursuant to Sections 0.131 and 0.331 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.131, 0.331. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Kathleen O'Brien Ham Deputy Chief Wireless Telecommunications
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2548A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2548A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2548A1.txt
  • to facilitate development of the most complete and well-delivered record possible. A limited extension of time appropriately balances the interests of commenting parties without unreasonably delaying the resolution of the proceeding. Therefore, we grant an extension of time for the filing of reply comments from November 5, 2001 to November 12, 2001. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that pursuant to Section 1.46 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.46, the requests of Cellular Telephone & Internet Association and Motient Services Inc. to extend the deadline for filing reply comments in this proceeding are GRANTED to the extent indicated. This actions is taken under delegated authority pursuant to Sections 0.51 and 0.261 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R . �� 0.51, 0.261.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2811A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2811A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2811A1.txt
  • That motion is unopposed. 3. Based on consideration of YKHC's and GCI's joint filing, we conclude that a 30 day extension of time is warranted. Therefore, we shall grant the Joint Motion for Extension of Time to supplement the record in this proceeding until 30 days from this Order's release date. 4. IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to 47 C.F.R. � 1.46 of the Commission's rules, that the Joint Motion for Extension of Time filed by Yukon Kuskokwim Health Corporation and General Communications, Inc. is GRANTED as stated herein. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Joint Motion for Extension of Time by counsel for Yukon Kuskokwim Health Corporation and General Communications, Inc., to Federal
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2859A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2859A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2859A1.txt
  • both carriers and state public utility commissions, and the impending holiday season, a 21-day extension is granted for both comments and reply comments from the dates those comments were due initially. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to authority found in section 4(i) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. � 154(i), and sections 0.91, 0.291 and 1.46 of the Commission's rules, 47 CFR �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.46, USTA's Motion for Extension of Time IS GRANTED to the extent described herein to establish a new comments deadline of January 22, 2002 and reply comments deadline of February 12, 2002. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Michelle M. Carey Chief, Policy and Program Planning Division Common Carrier Bureau Performance Measurements and Standards
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2911A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2911A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2911A1.txt
  • Special Access Measurements and Standards Notice by 13 days, so that comments in this proceeding are now due by January 22, 2002, and reply comments are due by February 12, 2002. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to authority found in section 4(i) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. � 154(i), and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.46 of the Commission's rules, 47 CFR �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.46, the deadline for in this proceeding shall be January 22, 2002 and the deadline for reply comments shall be February 12, 2002. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Michelle M. Carey Chief, Policy and Program Planning Division Common Carrier Bureau Performance Measurements and Standards for Interstate Special Access Services, et al., Notice of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2918A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2918A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2918A1.txt
  • 8bit Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C. 20554 In the Matter of Cross-Ownership of Broadcast Stations and Newspapers Newspaper/Radio Cross-Ownership Waiver Policy ) ) ) ) ) ) ) MM Docket No. 01-235 MM Docket No. 96-197 ORDER Adopted: December 14, 2001 Released: December 14, 2001 By the Chief, Mass Media Bureau: On December 12, 2001, pursuant to section 1.46 of the Commission's Rules, the AFL-CIO, Center for Digital Democracy, Civil Rights Forum on Communications Policy, Consumer Federation of America, Consumers Union, Leadership Conference on Civil Rights, Media Alliance, National Organization for Women, and Office of Communication of United Church of Christ (hereafter, ``petitioners'') filed a ``Request for Extension of Time to File Reply Comments'' in this proceeding. The current
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2965A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2965A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2965A1.txt
  • shall grant Unicom's Motion for Extension of Time to supplement the record in this proceeding until 30 days from this Order's release date. We shall thereafter issue an order on the basis of the information contained in the record as it exists on the thirtieth day from this Order's release date. 4. IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to 47 C.F.R. � 1.46 of the Commission's rules, that the Motion for Extension of Time filed by Unicom, Inc. is GRANTED as stated herein. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Motion for Extension of Time by counsel for Unicom, Inc., to Federal Communications Commission, filed November 21, 2001 (Motion for Extension of Time). Request for Review
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-451A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-451A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-451A1.txt
  • the time for filing reply comments in the above captioned proceeding IS EXTENDED to April 9, 2001. This action is taken pursuant to the authority found in Sections 4(i), 301, 302, 303(e), 303(f), and 303(r) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 154(i), 301, 302, 303(e), 303(f), and 303(r); and pursuant to Sections 0.31, 0.241 and 1.46 of the Commission's Rules, 47 CFR �� 0.31, 0.241 and 1.46. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Bruce Franca Acting Chief Office of Engineering and Technology See In The Matter Of Reallocation of the 216-220 MHz, 1390-1395MHz, 1427-1429 MHz, 1429-1432 MHz, 1432-1435 MHz, 1670-1675 MHz and 2385-2390 MHz Government Transfer Bands, ET Docket No. 00-221, Notice of Proposed Rule Making, 15 FCC Rcd.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-501A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-501A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-501A1.txt
  • Network Elements to Provide Exchange Access Service, CC Docket No. 96-98, Public Notice, DA 01-169 (rel. Jan. 24, 2001). 66 FR 8555 (Feb. 1, 2001). Implementation of the Local Competition Provisions of the Telecommunications Act of 1996, CC Docket No. 96-98, Motion for Modification of Comment Schedule (filed Feb. 22, 2001). Id. at 1-2. Id. at 2-3. 47 C.F.R. � 1.46(a). 47 C.F.R. �� 1.1206. { | +D`� +D�� � � �����PNG > �!�R>^��S�S߿�"K�k������er4 �J�dM�O�O � �,I TV��5 0�z̪�� ��� %�o� �� � �a�% Tf(c) U~��Uy�Ӛ�o=�c� {�YAD ���Zv�}�YAD e/�,�-�%E9 ^1�J 2�� bʆPh=f 8H�]}��`��2@ ���'����X�t�p�O � ��$��>��� -�m�``�Q(q P� ���e D �_�� p�/]b|?�O� V��Jõ tXT���e� 2)�V``� (c)}�l�tmE...bϡ gs�>o���(R)"q�Q ܆���D N ��- >��r�Kp��-~i�f�M�� z} ���� tm��(c)��cv `��� 0i 0i 0i 0i 0i 0i
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-50A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-50A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-50A1.txt
  • Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C. 20554 In the Matter of Standardized and Enhanced Disclosure Requirements for Television Broadcast Licensee Public Interest Obligations ) ) ) ) ) ) MM Docket No. 00-168 Adopted: January 8, 2001 Released: January 8, 2001 By the Chief, Mass Media Bureau: Pursuant to Section 1.46 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.46, the National Association of Broadcasters, the North Carolina Association of Broadcasters, The Walt Disney Company, Viacom Inc., and the Named State Associations (collectively ``Movants'') have jointly moved for a 30-day extension of the January 17, 2001 date for filing reply comments in the above-captioned proceeding. Movants maintain that, given the substantive and
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-57A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-57A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-57A1.txt
  • comments until February 13, 2001 and Phase 3 reply comments until March 14, 2001. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that the motion for extension of time filed by Qwest Corporation on January 4, 2001, IS GRANTED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Kenneth P. Moran Chief, Accounting Safeguards Division See Qwest Corporation Motion for Extension of Time, filed January 4, 2001. 47 C.F.R. � 1.46. (continued....) Federal Communications Commission DA 00-2877 Federal Communications Commission DA 01-57 @& �0� �0� �0� �0� �0� �0� ���
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-581A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-581A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-581A1.txt
  • No. 00-256 CC Docket No. 96-45 CC Docket No. 98-77 CC Docket No. 98-166 Adopted: March 5, 2001 Released: March 5, 2001 By the Chief, Common Carrier Bureau: On February 21, 2001, the Illinois Commerce Commission filed a motion seeking an extension of time in which to file comments and reply comments in the above-captioned rulemaking proceedings pursuant to sections 1.46(b) and 1.47 of the Commission's rules. Specifically, the Illinois Commerce Commission requests that the date on which comments are due be extended from February 26, 2001, to March 7, 2001, and that the date on which reply comments are due be extended from March 12, 2001, to March 21, 2001. In support of its request, it states that the next
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-610A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-610A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-610A1.txt
  • was a delay in Complainant receiving a copy of the Response, Complainant requires the extension in order to provide the Commission with a complete and accurate reply. Moreover, Respondent has agreed to the brief extension of time. Therefore, we will extend the time for filing a reply until March 15, 2001. 3. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to Sections 0.321, 1.46 and 1.1407 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.321, 1.46 and 1.1407, that Complainant's Motion for Extension of Time IS GRANTED TO THE EXTENT INDICATED HEREIN. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Kathleen F. Costello, Acting Chief Financial Analysis and Compliance Division Cable Services Bureau 47 C.F.R. � 1.46(a). Federal Communications Commission DA 00-0000 Federal Communications Commission DA 01-610 �0� �0� �0�
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-719A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-719A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-719A1.txt
  • in its opposition that it decided not to oppose the waiver petition because that petition was ``plainly defective'' is false. Even assuming that WBRZ-TV does have standing, KATC maintains that WBRZ-TV has failed to adhere to the Commission's procedures or to demonstrate a legitimate reason for being unable to submit its pleadings within the specified time, as required by section 1.46(a) of the Commission's rules. KATC argues that WBRZ-TV's assertion that it needed ``the assistance of a consultant with expertise in the evaluation of significantly viewed studies'' is insufficient under the Commission's standards to justify its failure to submit its opposition in a timely manner. Moreover, KATC states that, contrary to WBRZ-TV's assertions, the instant petition for reconsideration does not rely
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-71A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-71A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-71A1.txt
  • Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit ... Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C. 20554 In the Matter of Definition of Radio Markets ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) MM Docket No. 00-244 Order Extending Time Adopted: January 10, 2001 Released: January 10, 2001 By the Chief, Mass Media Bureau 1. Pursuant to Section 1.46 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.46, the National Association Of Broadcasters, The North Carolina Association Of Broadcasters, and the Virginia Association of Broadcasters Company (collectively ``Movants'') have jointly moved for a 60-day extension of the dates for filing comments and replies in the above-captioned proceeding, currently set at January 26, 2001, and February 12, 2001, respectively. Movants maintain
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-754A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-754A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-754A1.txt
  • GHz Band ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ET Docket No. 98-206 RM-9147 RM-9245 ORDER EXTENDING REPLY COMMENT PERIOD Adopted: March 23, 2001 Released: March 23, 2001 By the Deputy Chief, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau: 1. On March 21, 2001, DIRECTV, Inc. and EchoStar Satellite Corporation jointly filed a motion, pursuant to Section 1.46 of the Commission's Rules, to extend the period for filing reply comments to the Further Notice of Proposed Rule Making in the above-captioned proceeding from March 26, 2001 to April 26, 2001. In response, Northpoint Technology, Ltd. and Broadwave USA, Inc. filed an Opposition to Motion for Extension of Time on March 23, 2001. For the reasons discussed below, we
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-905A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-905A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-905A1.txt
  • time. However, we recognize that the subject matter in question is relatively complex, and we believe that a short extension of the reply comment period will enable interested parties to more fully analyze the information submitted in the comments. Accordingly, we will designate May 11, 2001, as the date reply comments are due. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to Section 1.46 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. Section 1.46, that the request for extension of time to file reply comments filed by the Media Access Project IS GRANTED IN PART. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the deadline for filing reply comments in this proceeding IS EXTENDED until May 11, 2001. This action is taken pursuant to the authority found in Sections
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-932A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-932A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-932A1.txt
  • Transportation System Applications Using Dedicated Short Range Communications ) ) ) ) ) WT Docket No. 01-90 DA 01-686 ORDER Adopted: April 12, 2001 Released: April 13, 2001 By the Deputy Chief, Public Safety and Private Wireless Division, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau: 1. On April 9, 2001, the Intelligent Transportation Society of America (ITS America) filed a motion, pursuant to Section 1.46 of the Commission's Rules, to extend the period for filing comments and reply comments to the Public Notice in the above-captioned proceeding. Specifically, ITS America requests a thirty day extension so that comments would be due on May 16, 2001, instead of April 16, 2001, and reply comments would be due on May 31, 2001, instead of May 1, 2001.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1033A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1033A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1033A1.txt
  • in downtown Washington, D.C. 3. Any party who failed to file comments or petitions to deny by the April 29, 2002 deadline due to our provision of the incorrect information in the March 29, 2002 Public Notice will not be penalized or prejudiced in any way. 4. Additionally, the Commission has received a request from the Applicants pursuant to Section 1.46 of the Commission's Rules for an extension of the reply comment deadline. The Applicants seek a one week extension of the reply comment deadline until May 21, 2002, so that they can submit more complete reply comments. 5. We believe that the public interest would best be served by granting an extension of the reply comment filing deadline. A substantial
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1070A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1070A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1070A1.txt
  • Apr. 10, 2002). The Public Notice provided that comments on the Petition are due no later than May 10, 2002 and that reply comments are due no later than May 28, 2002. On May 6, 2002, Warren C. Havens and Telesaurus Holdings GB LLC (collectively, Telesaurus) filed a Request for Extension of Time to Submit Comments (Telesaurus Request), citing section 1.46(c) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.46(c). Section 1.46(c), however, applies only to ``proceedings other than notice and comment rule making proceedings,'' and therefore is inapplicable. Id. Section 1.46(b) provides that a motion for extension of time to file comments in response to a petition for rulemaking ``shall be filed at least 7 days before the filing date.'' 47
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1162A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1162A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1162A1.txt
  • for Reconsideration in the above captioned proceeding IS EXTENDED to May 31, 2002. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the time for filing replies IS EXTENDED to June 28, 2002. This action is taken pursuant to the authority found in Sections 4(i) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. � 154(i) and pursuant to Sections 0.31, 0.241 and 1.46 of the Commission's Rules, 47 CFR �� 0.31, 0.241 and 1.46. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Edmond J. Thomas Chief Office of Engineering and Technology (...continued from previous page) (continued....) Federal Communications Commission DA 02-1162 Federal Communications Commission DA 02-1162 � � � � � � � � � I I m n o �� o � � � � � �
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1196A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1196A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1196A1.txt
  • that the ITA Request for Extension of Time IS GRANTED, to the extent stated herein and IS DENIED in all other respects; and that the time for filing reply comments in the captioned proceeding IS EXTENDED until JULY 8, 2002. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION D'wana R. Terry Chief, Public Safety and Private Wireless Division Wireless Telecommunications Bureau See 47 C.F.R. � 1.46(a). See Improving Public Safety Communications in the 800 MHz Band; Consolidating the 800 MHz Industrial/Land Transportation and Business Pool Channels, WT Docket No. 02-55, Notice of Proposed Rule Making, FCC 02-81, � 3 (rel. Mar. 15, 2002). Given that the thirtieth day is a Federal holiday, we believe it is prudent to extend the filing deadline to July 8, 2002.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1253A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1253A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1253A1.txt
  • the proceeding. All other requirements discussed in the Public Notice remain in effect. For further information, please contact Sheryl Todd, Wireline Competition Bureau, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, at 202-418-7400. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 5(c) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 154(i), 154(j), 155(c), and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.46 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.46, the request for extension of time filed by NTELOS, Inc. IS GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART as discussed herein. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau See Virginia Cellular LLC Petition for Designation as an Eligible Telecommunications Carrier in the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1254A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1254A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1254A1.txt
  • Federation of America, and other consumer groups (collectively, ``MAP''). On April 29, 2002, MAP filed a Petition to Deny the above-referenced applications. On May 21, 2002, the Applicants filed an Opposition to this Petition to Deny. Replies to the Applicants' Opposition are due on May 29, 2002. MAP has requested a one-week extension of the reply deadline pursuant to Section 1.46 of the Commission's Rules. In its request, MAP states that the Applicants filed a lengthy Opposition which will require more than one week to address because of MAP's limited staff resources. MAP also notes that the intervening holiday imposes additional hardship in meeting the May 29 deadline. Accordingly, MAP seeks a one-week extension of the reply comment deadline until June
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1363A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1363A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1363A1.txt
  • Janice M. Myles, Wireline Competition Bureau, Competition Policy Division, 202-418-1580. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Brent M. Olson Deputy Chief, Competition Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Qwest Communications International, Inc., Petition for Declaratory Ruling On the Scope of the Duty to File and Obtain Prior Approval of Negotiated Contractual Arrangements Under Section 252(a)(1), DA 02-976 (rel. April 29, 2002). 47 C.F.R. � 1.46(a). Id. � 1.1206. (...continued from previous page) (continued....) Federal Communications Commission DA 02-1363 Federal Communications Commission DA 02-1363 l t { | � � F
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1456A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1456A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1456A1.txt
  • record in the proceeding must be developed according to the comment dates provided in the Notice. UTC has not shown good cause for an extension of time. 3. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to authority delegated by Sections 4(i), 4(j), and 5(c) of the Communications Act, as amended, 47 U.S.C. Sections 154(i), 154(j), and 155(c), and sections 0.241 and 1.46 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. Sections 0.241 and 1.46, the motion for extension of time filed by UTC on June 10, 2002, is DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Edmond J. Thomas Chief, Office of Engineering and Technology ``Spectrum Policy Task Force Seeks Public Comment on Issues Related to Commission's Spectrum Policies,'' ET Docket No. 02-135, DA 02-1311 (rel. June 6,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1523A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1523A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1523A1.txt
  • to August 7, 2002. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED that the petitioners' Request for Extension of Time IS GRANTED, and that the time for filing reply comments in the captioned proceeding IS EXTENDED until August 7, 2002. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Ramona Melson Deputy Chief, Public Safety and Private Wireless Division Wireless Telecommunications Bureau Request at 2. Id. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.46(a). See Improving Public Safety Communications in the 800 MHz Band; Consolidating the 800 MHz Industrial/Land Transportation and Business Pool Channels, WT Docket No. 02-55, Order Granting Extension of Time, DA-02-1196 (rel. May 17, 2002). (...continued from previous page) (continued....) Federal Communications Commission DA 02-1523 Federal Communications Commission DA-02-1523 + 6 8 E \ y z � � � � �
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1558A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1558A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1558A1.txt
  • must be developed according to the comment dates provided in the Notice. NY OFT and SDR Forum have not shown good cause for an extension of time. 3. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to authority delegated by Sections 4(i), 4(j), and 5(c) of the Communications Act, as amended, 47 U.S.C. Sections 154(i), 154(j), and 155(c), and sections 0.241 and 1.46 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. Sections 0.241 and 1.46, the motions for extension of time filed by NY OFT and SDR Forum on June 24, 2002, are DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Edmond J. Thomas Chief, Office of Engineering and Technology ``Spectrum Policy Task Force Seeks Public Comment on Issues Related to Commission's Spectrum Policies,'' ET Docket No. 02-135, DA
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-156A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-156A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-156A1.txt
  • 20554 In the Matter of Rules and Policies Concerning Multiple Ownership of Radio Broadcast Stations in Local Markets Definition of Radio Markets ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) MM Docket No. 01-317 MM Docket No. 00-244 ORDER Adopted: January 23, 2002 Released: January 23, 2002 By the Chief, Mass Media Bureau: On January 11, 2002, pursuant to section 1.46 of the Commission's Rules, the National Association of Broadcasters (``NAB''), Clear Channel Communications, Inc., Cumulus Media Inc., Hispanic Broadcasting Corporation, Infinity Broadcasting Corporation, and RadioWorks, Inc. (hereafter, ``petitioners'') filed a ``Joint Motion for Extension of Comment and Reply Comment Deadlines'' in this proceeding. The current deadlines to file comments and reply comments are February 11, 2002, and March 11, 2002,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1593A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1593A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1593A1.txt
  • Commission Washington, D.C. 20554 In the matter of Americatel Corporation and Telecom Italia of North America, Inc. Application to Modify Regulatory Classification from Dominant to Non-Dominant on the U.S.-Argentina Route ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ITC-MOD-20020502-00212 ITC-MOD-20020502-00213 ORDER Adopted: July 3, 2002 Released: July 3, 2002 By the Chief, Policy Division, International Bureau: Pursuant to section 1.46 of the Commission's rules, Americatel Corporation and Telecom Italia of North America, Inc. (collectively, Applicants), filed a request for an extension of time to file their reply to the Opposition filed by AT&T Corporation in the above captioned proceeding. Under the established pleading schedule, reply comments are due by July 3, 2002. Applicants request that the reply comment date be
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1723A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1723A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1723A1.txt
  • October 1 and October 31, respectively. If, upon the filing of WCA's anticipated petition for rulemaking, it appears that a further extension in this proceeding is in order, WCA may make such a request at that time. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to Section 4(i) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. � 154(i), and Section 1.46 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.46, WCA's Motion to Defer, filed June 14, 2002, IS GRANTED IN PART to the extent indicated above, and the periods for filing comments and reply comments ARE EXTENDED to October 1, 2002, and October 31, 2002, respectively. This action is taken under delegated authority pursuant to Sections 0.131 and 0.331 of the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1741A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1741A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1741A1.txt
  • to �� 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91 and 0.291, that the deadline for filing comments in this proceeding is extended until August 5, 2002, and the deadline for filing reply comments in this proceeding is extended until August 26, 2002. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Carol E. Mattey Deputy Chief, Wireline Competition Bureau 47 C.F.R. � 1.46(a). Review of Section 251 Unbundling Obligations of Incumbent Local Exchange Carriers, CC Docket No. 01-338; Implementation of the Local Competition Provisions of the Telecommunications Act of 1996, CC Docket No. 96-98; Deployment of Wireline Services Offering Advanced Telecommunications Capability, CC Docket No. 98-147, Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, FCC 01-361, 16 FCC Rcd 22781 (rel. Dec. 20, 2001) (Reply Comments due
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-179A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-179A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-179A1.txt
  • September 17, 2001, twenty-one days after MRA's Petition was filed. MRSI indicates that MRA has no objection to a five-day extension of time. Opposition at 3. We dismiss the Opposition because MRSI has not shown good cause for its late filing. ``It is the policy of the Commission that extensions of time shall not be routinely granted.'' 47 C.F.R. � 1.46(a). In this case, MRSI has failed to provide any explanation as to why it failed to file a timely opposition. Moreover, MRSI also failed to notify Commission staff that it was seeking an extension of time to file its opposition. 47 C.F.R. � 1.46(c). Since we are dismissing the Opposition, we will also dismiss the ``Reply to Opposition to Petition
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1999A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1999A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1999A1.txt
  • DA 02-1533 (rel. June 28, 2002). Lucent and Plaintiffs Joint Motion to Extend Reply Comment Deadline and Defer All Further Action, Lucent's Third Supplement to Petition for Declaratory Ruling on State Consumer Protection Laws as They Relate to AT&T/Lucent Leasing of Customer Premises Equipment, WC Docket No. 02-147 (fil. August 12, 2002) (Joint Motion). Id. at 2. 47 C.F.R. � 1.46(a). In order to avoid confusion, we have chosen to extend the date for reply comments to a date certain rather than adopt the exact approach requested in the Joint Motion. (continued....) Federal Communications Commission DA 02-1999 Federal Communications Commission DA 02-1999 � ' ' `` '' " � � � � �� @& � � � � � ) )
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2214A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2214A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2214A1.txt
  • Accordingly we grant CUSC's request. Parties may file responses by September 23, 2002 and replies by October 7, 2002. For further information, please contact Sheryl Todd, Wireline Competition Bureau, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, 202-418-7400. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 5(c) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. �� 154(i), 154(j), 155(c), and sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.46 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.46, the request for extension of time filed by the Competitive Universal Service Coalition IS GRANTED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Eric N. Einhorn, Acting Chief Telecommunications Access Policy Division See National Telecommunications Cooperative Association, Petition for Rulemaking to Define ``Captured'' and ``New'' Subscriber Lines for Purposes of Receiving Universal Service Support Pursuant
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2624A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2624A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2624A1.txt
  • of the Thanksgiving holiday on November 28, 2002, we will adjust the requested deadline for filing comments and reply comments to December 6, 2002, and January 17, 2003, respectively. IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to Sections 4(i), 4(j) and 5(c) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 154(i), 154(j) and 155(c), and Sections 0.61, 0.283, and 1.46 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.61, 0.283, and 1.46, the request for extension of time filed by Public Knowledge, the Center for Democracy and Technology and Consumers Union IS GRANTED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION W. Kenneth Ferree Chief, Media Bureau Digital Broadcast Copy Protection, MB Docket No. 02-230, Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (rel. Aug. 9, 2002). Digital Broadcast Copy
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-263A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-263A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-263A1.txt
  • due on or before 75 days after publication of the Notice in the Federal Register. We believe that this additional time will enable commenters to prepare comprehensive comments and replies. This, in turn, will help the Commission in its decision making and in resolving the complex issues raised in this proceeding. IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.46, 1.415 and 1.419 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.46, 1.415 and 1.419, interested parties shall file comments on or before forty-five (45) days from the date of publication of the Notice in the Federal Register, and reply comments on or before seventy-five (75) days from the date of publication of the Notice in the Federal Register.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2755A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2755A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2755A1.txt
  • for each year surveyed. Section 76.5(i) of the Commission's rules requires that for network stations to be considered significantly viewed, the survey results should exceed a 3 percent share of total viewing hours and a net weekly circulation of 25 percent, by at least one standard error. The February 2000 reported results for KXLY-TV, with one standard error added, are 1.46 percent share of total viewing hours and a 15.67 percent net weekly circulation; for May 2000 the shares are 1.10 percent share of total viewing hours and a net weekly circulation of 18.30 percent. For February 2001, the reported results for KXLY-TV with the standard errors added are .95 percent share of total viewing hours and a net weekly circulation
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2977A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2977A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2977A1.txt
  • numbers are inflated by roughly ten percent ``due to dual receivers, and limited commercial and test accounts.'' See Charter Communications, DA 02-1919 at n.13 (MB rel. Aug. 6, 2002). Since then, SkyTRENDS has reportedly revised its inflation estimate from ten to fifteen percent. Petition at n.17. Burnside Opposition at 2; Pulaski Opposition at 1-2. Id. Id. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.46(a). Petition at 5 and Exhibit 4. See id. at Exhibit 6. See 47 U.S.C � 543(l)(1)(A); 47 C.F.R. � 76.905(b)(l). Petition at 7 and Exhibits 4, 6 (2,577 Charter subscribers � 10,126 unincorporated Knox County 2000 Census Households = 0.254). 47 C.F.R. � 0.283. (...continued from previous page) (continued...) Federal Communications Commission DA 02-2977 Federal Communications Commission DA 02-2977 �
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3210A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3210A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3210A1.txt
  • Commission intends to work diligently to provide a complete response to ATA's FOIA request. To the extent necessary, ATA will have additional opportunities to supplement its comments through ex parte filings. IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to section 4(i) and 4(j) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 154(i) and 154(j) and sections 0.141, 0.361, and 1.46 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.141, 0.361, and 1.46, the request for extension of time filed by American Teleservices Association IS GRANTED, IN PART, AND DENIED, IN PART. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION K. Dane Snowden Chief Consumer & Governmental Affairs Bureau Rules and Regulations Implementing the Telephone Consumer Protection Act of 1991, Notice of Proposed Rulemaking and Memorandum Opinion
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3371A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3371A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3371A1.txt
  • that many ITFS licensees are closed for business. As a result of this extension, licensees and applicants in the Services will have had over 100 days to review our licensing records and prepare any necessary corrections and responses. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED pursuant to Section 4(i) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. � 154(i), and Section 1.46 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.46, that the requests filed by Troutman Sanders LLP on November 24, 2002 and by the Wireless Communications Association International and the National ITFS Association on November 27, 2002 ARE GRANTED to the extent stated herein and ARE OTHERWISE DENIED in all other respects. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to Section 4(i) of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3371A1_Erratum.doc
  • that many ITFS licensees are closed for business. As a result of this extension, licensees and applicants in the Services will have had over 100 days to review our licensing records and prepare any necessary corrections and responses. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED pursuant to Section 4(i) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. � 154(i), and Section 1.46 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.46, that the requests filed by Troutman Sanders LLP on November 24, 2002 and by the Wireless Communications Association International and the National ITFS Association on November 27, 2002 ARE GRANTED to the extent stated herein and ARE OTHERWISE DENIED in all other respects. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to Section 4(i) of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3389A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3389A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3389A1.txt
  • Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. � 154(i), 309, and Sections 21.30 and 21.902 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 21.30, 21.902, that Atlantic Microsystems Inc.'s application filed on October 21, 1996 IS DISMISSED. 7. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to Section 4(i) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. � 154(i), and Section 1.46 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.46, that the Motion for Extension of Time filed by Grand MMDS Alliance New York F/P Partnership on January 30, 1997 IS GRANTED. This action is taken under delegated authority pursuant to Sections 0.131 and 0.331 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.131, 0.331. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION D'wana R. Terry Chief, Public
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3400A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3400A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3400A1.txt
  • the Spectrum Policy Task Force and prepare complete, substantive comments by the current deadline. Leggett concurs that additional time is needed due to the holiday season, and adds that global subjects such as spectrum policy require more time for the many diverse parties to develop thoughtful comments on the wide range of issues presented. 2. As set forth in Section 1.46 of the Commission's Rules, it is our policy that extensions of time for filing comments shall not be routinely granted. Taking into consideration the circumstances outlined by petitioners, however, we believe that an 18-day extension of time to file comments and reply comments is warranted, and hereby grant such an extension. We also remind parties that, to the extent their
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3402A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3402A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3402A1.txt
  • Priority Mail should be addressed to 445 12th Street, SW, Washington, D.C. 20554. All filings must be addressed to the Commission's Secretary, Office of the Secretary, Federal Communications Commission. IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to Sections 4(i), 4(j) and 5(c) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 154(i), 154(j) and 155(c), and Sections 0.61, 0.283, and 1.46 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.61, 0.283, and 1.46, the request for extension of time filed by New Yorkers for Fair Use IS DENIED; however, filings will be accepted to the extent described herein. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION W. Kenneth Ferree Chief, Media Bureau Digital Broadcast Copy Protection, MB Docket No. 02-230, Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (rel. Aug. 9,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3476A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3476A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3476A1.txt
  • requirements discussed in the Public Notice remain in effect. For further information please contact Katie King, Jennifer Schneider, or Narda Jones, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7400, TTY (202) 418-0484. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 5(c) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. �� 154(i), 154(j), 155(c), and sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.46 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.46, the request for extension of time filed by Verizon IS GRANTED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATION COMMISSION Carol E. Mattey Deputy Chief, Wireline Competition Bureau Comment Sought on the Recommended Decision of the Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service Regarding the Non-Rural High-Cost Support Mechanism, CC Docket No. 96-45, Public Notice, DA 02-2976
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3491A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3491A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3491A1.txt
  • with FCCA and APCO that the complexity of issues present in this proceeding warrants an extension of the reply comment deadline. We therefore grant the FCCA request, and extend the reply comment period to January 21, 2003. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED that pursuant to Section 4(i) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. � 154(i), and Section 1.46 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.46, the Request for Extension of Time filed by the Forestry Conservation Communications Association on December 10, 2002 IS GRANTED, and that the time for filing reply comments in the captioned proceeding IS EXTENDED until JANUARY 21, 2003. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Request for Extension of Time filed by the Association
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3501A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3501A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3501A1.txt
  • have any questions, please contact Hugh L. Boyle at (202) 418-7147 or Mika Savir at (202) 418-0384. Sincerely, Maureen F. Del Duca Deputy Chief Investigations and Hearings Division Enforcement Bureau See Public Notice, ``Enforcement Bureau Seeks Comments on SBC Communications Section 272 Compliance Biennial Audit Report in CC Docket No. 96-150,'' DA 02-2925, rel. Oct. 31, 2002. 47 C.F.R. � 1.46(a). Federal Communications Commission DA 02-3501 Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C. 20554 �B��k�(/YM��`鉉��PNG �0���eX...�W0f�"˸ -ʝ �D... p-C� C\ i8 �] ~'��\��� g�bF�JU �}p�� Ӵ�:|Y�.̕� ���`]fe�ʦ�S ��8���o��(R)� �� -�o} �^ rt2 ; X�0~B�e6%����70o�B(R)x�oG�� �k��"a �n�"W -1��$�7'����2 o �  ��2� ����" ��� +� bK`�˯� � �����v'�B-�7sp?$ � ����)} �� �s���-�U�(� �� ��T��`��:�I�a�D"M+ �%i� n�� 0:*�� ��Ԩ�h8R� �� �E�x�΂`�D����#pWQ%m�m3Xķ���N<�{�1 ܋ Y� -$ ��
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3502A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3502A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3502A1.txt
  • regarding RM-10613, filed by the Office of Communication of the United Church of Christ, Inc., IS GRANTED. 6. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the deadline for filing statements regarding RM-10613 IS EXTENDED to January 31, 2003. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Jeffrey J. Carlisle Senior Deputy Chief, Wireline Competition Bureau Public Notice, Report No. 2585 (rel. Dec. 5, 2002). 47 C.F.R. � 1.46(a). (continued....) Federal Communications Commission DA 02-3502 Federal Communications Commission DA 02-3502 ) * B C E e f g h v (R) � � � � � � " � � � � � � � � � � � � � � B ) A B D E g h v w x y { | ~  �
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-423A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-423A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-423A1.txt
  • Radio Service, Inc., Order on Reconsideration, FCC File Nos. 0000297937 and 0000297947, DA 02-179 at � 4, n.21 (PSPWD Jan. 24, 2002); In the Matter of Dave's Communications, Inc., Order, DA 01-2826 at �� 2-5 (CWD Dec. 5, 2001). We further note that it is the Commission's policy that extensions of time shall not be routinely granted. 47 C.F.R. � 1.46(a). See 47 C.F.R. � 1.106(h) (providing that replies to petitions for reconsideration ``shall be limited to matters raised in the opposition''). Petition at 2 (citing 47 C.F.R. � 1.106(n)). Petition at 2. In re Application of Ray M. Stanfield, Memorandum Opinion and Order, 12 FCC Rcd 3345, 3348, � 7 (1997) (citing 47 C.F.R. � 1.102(b)(1)). See 47 C.F.R. �
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-483A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-483A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-483A1.txt
  • ) ) ) ) ) ) WT Docket No. 02 - 08 RM-9267 RM-9692 RM-9797 RM-9854 RM-9882 ORDER DENYING REQUEST TO EXTEND COMMENT PERIOD Adopted: February 28, 2002 Released: February 28, 2002 By the Acting Chief, Public Safety and Private Wireless Division, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau: On February 25, 2002, the American Hospital Association (AHA) filed a motion, pursuant to Section 1.46 of the Commission's Rules, to extend the period for filing comments to the Notice of Proposed Rule Making in the above-captioned proceeding. AHA requests that the deadline for filing initial comments be extended thirty days from March 4, 2002, to April 3, 2002. For the reasons discussed below, we deny the request to extend the initial comment period. AHA requests
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-582A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-582A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-582A1.txt
  • 20554 In the Matter of Rules and Policies Concerning Multiple Ownership of Radio Broadcast Stations in Local Markets Definition of Radio Markets ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) MM Docket No. 01-317 MM Docket No. 00-244 ORDER Adopted: March 8, 2002 Released: March 8, 2002 By the Chief, Mass Media Bureau: On February 27, 2002, pursuant to section 1.46 of the Commission's Rules, the Infinity Broadcasting Corporation, Clear Channel Communications, Inc., and Hispanic Broadcasting Corporation (hereafter, ``petitioners'') filed a ``Joint Motion for Extension of Comment and Reply Comment Deadlines'' in this proceeding. Previously, on January 23, 2002, the Commission granted a motion to extend the original deadlines to file comments and reply comments by extending the comment deadline for
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-591A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-591A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-591A1.txt
  • Myles, Common Carrier Bureau, Policy and Planning Division, 202-418-1580. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Jeffrey Carlisle Deputy Chief, Common Carrier Bureau Sixty days after Federal Register publication of the Triennial Review NPRM is March 18, 2002 and 105 days after Federal Register publication of the Triennial Review NPRM is April 30, 2002. 67 Fed Reg. 1947 (Jan. 15, 2002). 47 C.F.R. � 1.46(a). 47 C.F.R. � 1.1206. Federal Communications Commission DA 02-591 Federal Communications Commission DA 02-591 � (c) � 1 X Y o � � � � � 1 X Y o � � � � �
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-601A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-601A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-601A1.txt
  • Commsission's interests in ensuring a thorough record without unreasonably or unnecessarily delaying the resolution of the proceeding are best served by a brief extension of the comment period. Therefore, we extend the time for the filing comments in response to the Technical Public Notice from March 15, 2002, to March 22, 2002. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that pursuant to Section 1.46 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.46, the requests of AT&T Wireless Services, Inc. and Cellular Telephone & Internet Association to extend the deadline for filing comments in response to the Technical Public Notice are GRANTED to the extent indicated. This actions is taken under delegated authority pursuant to Sections 0.51 and 0.261 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-704A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-704A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-704A1.txt
  • of Comment Period (March 22, 2002). Inquiry Concerning High-Speed Access to the Internet Over Cable and Other Facilities; Internet Over Cable Declaratory Ruling; Appropriate Regulatory Treatment for Broadband Access to the Internet Over Cable Facilities, GN Docket No. 00-185 and CS Docket No. 02-52, Declaratory Ruling and Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, FCC 02-77 (rel. March 15, 2002). 47 C.F.R. � 1.46(a). Id. � 1.1206. (...continued from previous page) (continued....) Federal Communications Commission DA 02-704 Federal Communications Commission DA 02-704 ! � � � � � ! � � � � � � F �0� �0� �0� �0� �0� �0� �0� � �
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-705A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-705A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-705A1.txt
  • FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Jeffrey Carlisle Deputy Chief, Common Carrier Bureau Seventy-five days after Federal Register publication of the ILEC Broadband NPRM is April 1, 2002. 67 Fed Reg. 1945 (Jan. 15, 2002). Review of the Regulatory Requirements for Incumbent LEC Broadband Telecommunications Services: CC Docket No. 01-337, Request for Extension of Reply Comment Period (March 22, 2002). 47 C.F.R. � 1.46(a). Id. � 1.1206. (...continued from previous page) (continued....) Federal Communications Commission DA 02-705 Federal Communications Commission DA 02-705 ) * A B D F S T U V W z { � � � � � � � � � ) A R S U V X z { � � � � � � � � � � �
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-777A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-777A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-777A1.txt
  • Public Notice at 1-2. Letter from Clint E. Odom, Verizon, to William Caton, Acting Secretary, Federal Communications Commission, WC Docket No. 02-67 (filed Apr. 1, 2002) (Verizon Response). Review of Unbundled Network Elements, Rates, Terms, and Conditions of Bell Atlantic New Jersey, Inc., Docket No. TO00060356, Decision and Order (rel. March 6, 2002) (Final UNE Rate Order). 47 C.F.R. � 1.46(a). See Updated Filing Requirements for Bell Operating Company Applications Under Section 271 of the Communications Act, Public Notice, 16 FCC Rcd 6923, 6930 (2001). Id. � 1.1206. (continued....) Federal Communications Commission DA 02-777 Federal Communications Commission DA 02-777 h u � � � � @& �0� �0� �0� �0� �0� �0� ��� j ^ ^
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-783A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-783A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-783A1.txt
  • in accordance with the Commission's ex parte rules. All other requirements discussed in the Further Notice remain in effect. For further information, please contact Sheryl Todd, Wireline Competition Bureau, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, 202-418-7400. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 5(c) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. �� 154(i), 154(j), 155(c), and sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.46 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.46, the request for extension of time filed by Verizon IS GRANTED as modified herein. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Carol E. Mattey Deputy Chief, Wireline Competition Bureau See Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service, 1998 Biennial Regulatory Review - Streamlined Contributor Reporting Requirements Associated with Administration of Telecommunications Relay Service, North American
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-787A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-787A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-787A1.txt
  • expeditiously in closing the record. Accordingly, USTA has not shown good cause for an extension of time. For further information, please contact Sheryl Todd, Wireline Competition Bureau, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, 202-418-7400. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to section 4(i), 4(j), and 5(c) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. �� 154(i), 154(j), and 155(c), and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.46 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, and 1.46, the request for extension of time filed by United States Telecom Association IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Carol E. Mattey Deputy Chief, Wireline Competition Bureau See Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service, CC Docket No. 96-45, Notice Proposed Rulemaking and Order, 17 FCC Rcd 2999 (2002) (NPRM); Federal-State Joint
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-790A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-790A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-790A1.txt
  • interests of commenting parties without unreasonably delaying the resolution of the proceeding. Therefore, we grant an extension of time for the filing of comments and petitions to deny from April 10, 2002 to April 22, 2002, and for the filing of responses and oppositions from April 24, 2002 to May 6, 2002. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that pursuant to Section 1.46 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.46, the request of XO Communications, Inc. to extend the pleading cycle in this proceeding is GRANTED to the extent indicated. This action is taken under delegated authority pursuant to Sections 0.51 and 0.261 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R . �� 0.51, 0.261. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION James Ball Chief, Policy Division International
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-804A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-804A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-804A1.txt
  • time, and should not compromise the timely resolution of the proceeding. Good cause thus exists for, and the public interest would be served by, grant of Petitioners' Motion. Accordingly, the comment deadline in this proceeding is extended until May 15, 2002, and the reply comment deadline is extended until June 17, 2002. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, pursuant to section 1.46 of the Commission's rules, that Petitioners' Motion is GRANTED. This action is taken pursuant to authority delegated by section 0.283 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 0.283. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Robert H. Ratcliffe Deputy Chief, Media Bureau 254 F.3d 226 (D.C. Cir. 2001). Motion at 1-2. (...continued from previous page) (continued....) Federal Communications Commission DA 02-804 Federal Communications Commission
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-806A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-806A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-806A1.txt
  • on Board Vessels in Bands Shared With Terrestrial Fixed Service ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) IB Docket No. 02-10 Adopted: April 9, 2002 Released: April 9, 2002 Comment Date: May 10, 2002 Reply Comment Date: June 10, 2002 By the Chief, Policy Division, International Bureau: On April 5, 2002, Maritime Telecommunications Network, Inc. (``MTN''), pursuant to Section 1.46 of the Commission's Rules, filed a ``Motion for Extension of Time'' requesting the Commission to extend the comment and reply comment filing deadlines in this proceeding to May 10, 2002, and June 10, 2002, respectively. MTN states that the current deadline for the filing of comments falls during the upcoming meeting of the ITU-R Working Group 4-9S in Geneva, at
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-876A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-876A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-876A1.txt
  • the public interest to consolidate our consideration of Supreme's virtually identical Petitions filed against Nextel WIP Notifications. We therefore grant Nextel WIP's Motions to Consolidate. For the same reasons, on our own motion we will consolidate our consideration of all of Supreme's Petitions filed against Nextel Holdings' Applications. Nextel WIP filed four motions for extension of time pursuant to section 1.46 of the Commission's rules. Nextel WIP states that additional time to file an opposition was necessary to review and prepare answers to the substantial number of Petitions. Supreme opposed the motions for extension of time, arguing that Nextel WIP was late in filing its second motion for extension of time because the Commission had not granted Nextel WIP's May 30,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-946A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-946A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-946A1.txt
  • D.C. 20554 In the Matter of Rules and Policies Concerning Multiple Ownership of Radio Broadcast Stations in Local Markets Definition of Radio Markets ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) MM Docket No. 01-317 MM Docket No. 00-244 ORDER Adopted: April 23, 2002 Released: April 23, 2002 By the Chief, Media Bureau: On April 17, 2002, pursuant to section 1.46 of the Commission's Rules, the Office of Communication of the United Church of Christ (``UCC'') filed a ``Motion for Extension of Reply Comment Deadline'' in this proceeding. Previously, on January 23, 2002, and on March 8, 2002, we granted motions and extended our comment and reply comment deadlines. The current deadline to file reply comments is April 24, 2002. UCC
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-991A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-991A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-991A1.txt
  • an original and four copies. Parties may also continue to file using the Commission's Electronic Comment Filing System (ECFS). All other comment filing procedures previously established in this proceeding remain unchanged. For further information, please contact Gary Remondino, Wireline Competition Bureau, Competition Policy Division, 202-418-2298 or gremondi@fcc.gov. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Dorothy T. Attwood Chief, Wireline Competition Bureau 47 C.F.R. � 1.46(a). (continued....) Federal Communications Commission DA 02-991 Federal Communications Commission DA 02-991 � � � � � � r s t � � � � � � � � � � � � r s t � � � � � � � � �� � � � � @& �
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1009A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1009A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1009A1.txt
  • the Universal Service Contribution Methodology Second Further Notice and Staff Study Public Notice shall remain in effect. For further information, please contact Sheryl Todd, Wireline Competition Bureau, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, 202-418-7400. 6. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 5(c) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. �� 154(i), 154(j), 155(c), and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.46 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.46, the request for extension of time filed by AT&T Corp. and WorldCom, Inc., IS GRANTED. 7. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 5(c) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. �� 154(i), 154(j), 155(c), and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.46 of the Commission's rules, 47
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1022A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1022A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1022A1.txt
  • IS EXTENDED to April 17, 2003, and that the deadline for filing reply comments in the above captioned proceeding IS EXTENDED to May 16, 2003. This action is taken pursuant to the authority found in Section 4(i) and 303 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 154(i) and 303; and pursuant to Sections 0.31, 0.241 and 1.46 of the Commission's Rules, 47 CFR �� 0.31, 0.241 and 1.46. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Edmond J. Thomas Chief, Office of Engineering and Technology Federal Communications Commission DA 03-1022
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1159A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1159A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1159A1.txt
  • comments. Fibertech also maintains that the Rochester, New York region, where its headquarters is located, recently suffered widespread power outages as a result of a major ice storm, impairing its ability to draft reply comments. Finally, Fibertech states that it conferred with counsel for all parties to this proceeding and none of the parties objected to a two-week extension. Section 1.46 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.46, provides that extensions of time will not be routinely granted by the Commission. However, given the circumstances cited by Fibertech, and the importance of the issues raised in this proceeding, we will grant Fibertech's request to extend the deadline to file reply comments. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 4(i) and
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1182A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1182A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1182A1.txt
  • extension of the period and scope of the waiver granted to AirCell of section 22.925 of the Commission's rules. This Public Notice established a deadline of April 10, 2003 for filing comments and a deadline of April 25, 2003 for filing reply comments. On April 14, 2003, AirCell filed a Motion for Extension of Time (``Motion'') requesting, pursuant to Section 1.46 of the Commission's rules, a 45-day extension for filing reply comments in this proceeding. It is the policy of the Commission that requests for extensions of time are not routinely granted. In this case, however, AirCell has shown good cause for extending the deadline for reply comments. AirCell contends, in its Motion, that we should extend the reply comment filing
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-163A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-163A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-163A1.txt
  • dated January 15, 2003 at 1-2; Letter from Shirley S. Fujimoto, Esq. representing Consumers Energy Company, to Darlene H. Dortch, Secretary, Federal Communications Commission, dated January 15, 2003 at 1-2 and Letter from Christine M. Gill, Esq. representing Southern Communications Services, Inc. to Darlene H. Dortch, Secretary, Federal Communications Commission, dated January 15, 2003 at 1-2. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.46(a). Motion at 2. Id. Id. at 2-3. Improving Public Safety Communications in the 800 MHz Band and Consolidating the 900 MHz Industrial Land Transportation and Business Pool Channels, Notice of Proposed Rule Making, WT Docket 02-55, 17 FCC Rcd 4873 (2002) (NPRM). Id. at 4875 �3. (...continued from previous page) (continued....) Federal Communications Commission DA 03-163 Federal Communications Commission DA
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-176A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-176A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-176A1.txt
  • In light of this action, the Media Bureau hereby denies the subsequent 180 day reply deadline extension request filed by New Yorkers for Fair Use on January 17, 2003. IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to Sections 4(i), 4(j) and 5(c) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 154(i), 154(j) and 155(c), and Sections 0.61, 0.283, and 1.46 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.61, 0.283, and 1.46, the request for extension of time filed by New Yorkers for Fair Use IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION W. Kenneth Ferree Chief, Media Bureau Digital Broadcast Copy Protection, MB Docket No. 02-230, Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (rel. Aug. 9, 2002). Digital Broadcast Copy Protection, MB Docket No. 02-230, Order
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1884A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1884A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1884A1.txt
  • amendment submitted by ADNY on March 17, 2003 IS REJECTED, and the ``Petition for Leave to Supplement Opposition to Petition to Deny'' filed by the Department of Education, Archdiocese of New York on March 17, 2003 IS DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to Section 4(i) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. � 154(i) and Sections 1.46 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.46, that the Motion for Extension of Time filed on December 27, 2002 by the Roman Catholic Diocese of Rockville Center IS GRANTED. This action is taken under delegated authority pursuant to Sections 0.131 and 0.331 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.131, 0.331. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION D'wana R. Terry Chief, Public
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-18A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-18A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-18A1.txt
  • reply comments that will result in a more fully-developed record, the Media Bureau will grant a limited extension of the deadline for filing reply comments to February 18, 2003. IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to Sections 4(i), 4(j) and 5(c) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 154(i), 154(j) and 155(c), and Sections 0.61, 0.283, and 1.46 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.61, 0.283, and 1.46, the request for extension of time filed by the American Library Association, the American Association of Law Libraries, the Association of Research Libraries, the Medical Library Association and the Special Library Association IS GRANTED to the extent described herein. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION W. Kenneth Ferree Chief, Media Bureau Digital
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1913A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1913A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1913A1.txt
  • modification application and direct the Licensing and Technical Analysis Branch (Branch), Public Safety and Private Wireless Division, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau, to review the application and make a determination whether MWTV has sufficiently demonstrated circumstances warranting grant of its request for an extension of time to conduct the necessary interference analysis. In evaluating MWTV's request, the Branch shall consider that Section 1.46(a) of the Commission's Rules states, ``It is the policy of the Commission that extensions of time shall not be routinely granted.'' In light of the passage of time since MWTV filed its original modification application, we direct the Branch to return MWTV's application and provide it with sixty days from the date of the return notice to supplement the record
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-203A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-203A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-203A1.txt
  • accordance with the Commission's ex parte rules. All other requirements discussed in the Second Further Notice remain in effect. For further information, please contact Sheryl Todd, Wireline Competition Bureau, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, 202-418-7400. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 5(c) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. �� 154(i), 154(j), 155(c), and sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.46 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.46, the request for extension of time filed by Consumers Union, Texas Office of Public Utility Counsel, Consumer Federation of America, Appalachian People's Action Coalition, Center for Digital Democracy, Edgemont Neighborhood Coalition, and Migrant Legal Action Program IS GRANTED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Eric N. Einhorn Acting Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2188A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2188A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2188A1.txt
  • accordance with the Commission's ex parte rules. All other requirements discussed in the Public notice remain in effect. For further information, please contact Paul Moon, Pricing Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau, (202) 418-1520. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 5(c) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. �� 154(i), 154(j) 155(c), and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.46 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.46, the request for extension of time filed by CompTel IS GRANTED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Tamara L. Preiss Chief, Pricing Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau See Pleading Cycle Established for AT&T Petition for Declaratory Ruling on Enhanced Prepaid Calling Card Services, WC Docket No. 03-133, Public Notice, DA 03-1896 (rel. June
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2194A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2194A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2194A1.txt
  • in accordance with the Commission's ex parte rules. All other requirements discussed in the public notices remain in effect. For further information, please contact Sheryl Todd, Wireline Competition Bureau, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, 202-418-7400. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 5(c) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. �� 154(i), 154(j), 155(c), and sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.46 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.46, the request for extension of time filed by ALLTEL Communications, Inc. IS GRANTED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Eric Einhorn, Chief Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau See ALLTEL Communications, Inc. Petition for Designation as an Eligible Telecommunications Carrier in the State of Alabama, filed April 14, 2003; ALLTEL Communications, Inc.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2229A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2229A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2229A1.txt
  • IB Docket No. 02-364 ORDER Adopted: July 8, 2003 Released: July 9, 2003 Comment Date: July 11, 2003 Reply Comment Date: July 25, 2003 By the Chief, International Bureau, Policy Division: Introduction In this Order, we deny a request to extend the deadline by two months for filing comments in the above-captioned proceeding. Nevertheless, because of the operation of Section 1.46 of the Commissions rules, which automatically extends the time for filing comments until two business days after the Commission denies a timely-filed motion for extension of time, we adjust the comment date and reply comment date to provide clarity to the parties. Comments are due to the Commission on July 11, 2003. Reply comments are due on July 25, 2003.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2333A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2333A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2333A1.txt
  • with the Commission's ex parte rules. All other requirements discussed in the Public notice remain in effect. For further information, please contact Jeremy D. Marcus, Pricing Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau, (202) 418-1520. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 5(c) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. �� 154(i), 154(j) 155(c), and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.46 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.46, the request for extension of time filed by the CLECs and by NARUC IS GRANTED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Tamara L. Preiss Chief, Pricing Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau See Pleading Cycle Established for Verizon Petition for Expedited Forbearance From the Commission's Current Pricing Rules for the Unbundled Network Element Platform,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2341A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2341A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2341A1.txt
  • Sections 74.903 and 74.912 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 74.903, 74.912, that the Licensing and Technical Analysis Branch SHALL DISMISS the application filed by Stephanie Engstrom (File No. BMAMDIH-20010129ADI) consistent with this Memorandum Opinion and Order. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to Section 4(i) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. � 154(i) and Sections 1.46 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.46, that the Motions for Extension of Time filed by Sherry Rullman ARE GRANTED. This action is taken under delegated authority pursuant to Sections 0.131 and 0.331 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.131, 0.331. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION D'wana R. Terry Chief, Public Safety and Private Wireless Division Wireless Telecommunications Bureau The
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2355A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2355A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2355A1.txt
  • Sections 74.903 and 74.912 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 74.903, 74.912, that the Licensing and Technical Analysis Branch SHALL DISMISS the application filed by City University (File No. BMAMDIH-20010129ADF) consistent with this Memorandum Opinion and Order. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to Section 4(i) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. � 154(i) and Sections 1.46 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.46, that the Motions for Extension of Time filed by KCTS Television, Inc. ARE GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to Section 4(i) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. � 154(i) and Sections 1.46 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.46, that the Motions for Extension of Time
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2357A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2357A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2357A1.txt
  • Sections 74.903 and 74.912 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 74.903, 74.912, that the Licensing and Technical Analysis Branch SHALL DISMISS the application filed by Lois Hubbard (File No. BMAMDIH-20010129ADM) consistent with this Memorandum Opinion and Order. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to Section 4(i) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. � 154(i) and Sections 1.46 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.46, that the Motions for Extension of Time filed by Sherry Rullman ARE GRANTED. This action is taken under delegated authority pursuant to Sections 0.131 and 0.331 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.131, 0.331. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION D'wana R. Terry Chief, Public Safety and Private Wireless Division Wireless Telecommunications Bureau The
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2596A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2596A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2596A1.txt
  • in accordance with the Commission's ex parte rules. All other requirements discussed in the public notice remain in effect. For further information, please contact Sheryl Todd, Wireline Competition Bureau, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, 202-418-7400. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 5(c) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. �� 154(i), 154(j), 155(c), and sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.46 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.46, the request for extension of time filed by Corr Wireless Communications, LLC IS GRANTED as described herein. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Eric Einhorn, Chief Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Corr Wireless is seeking designation as an ETC to receive federal universal service support for rural study areas in its
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2684A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2684A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2684A1.txt
  • necessary.''). See also January 21 Letter, supra note 3, at 1 n.2 (arguing that the LRT Reply, filed two weeks late and not served on Applicants or their counsel, should be summarily dismissed). We note that the copy of the LRT Reply submitted to the Commission's Electronic Comment Filing System fails to include a service list. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.46(a) (2002) (``It is the policy of the Commission that extensions of time shall not be routinely granted.''). Moreover, with respect to the LRT Reply, we are unable to determine that LRT served the parties as required by the Commission's ex parte rules. See 47 C.F.R. �� 1.1200-1.1216 (2002). As this is a restricted proceeding, see 47 C.F.R. � 1.1208 (2002),
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2750A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2750A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2750A1.txt
  • Report and Order, WT Docket No. 00-32, 18 FCC Rcd 9152 (2003) (Third Report and Order). See 68 Fed. Reg. 49480 (2003). Oppositions to a petition for reconsideration filed in a rulemaking proceeding ordinarily are due fifteen days after public notice of the petition's filing is published in the Federal Register. 47 C.F.R. � 1.429(e), (f). See 47 C.F.R. � 1.46(a). See Third Report and Order, 19 FCC Rcd at 9172-75 �� 50-57; Request at 2. Request at 2. Id. Replies to an opposition to a petition for reconsideration filed in a rulemaking proceeding ordinarily are due ten days after the time for filing oppositions has expired. 47 C.F.R. � 1.429(g). The first business day ten days after October 3, 2003
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2979A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2979A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2979A1.txt
  • 251 Unbundling Obligations of Incumbent Local Exchange Carriers (CC Docket No. 01-338), Implementation of the Local Competition Provisions of the Telecommunications Act of 1996 (CC Docket No. 96-98), and Deployment of Wireline Services Offering Advanced Telecommunications Capability (CC Docket No. 98-147) Request for Extension of Comment Period (filed Sept. 23, 2003). Id. at 1. Id. at 2. 47 C.F.R. � 1.46(a). 47 C.F.R. � 1.1206. PUBLIC NOTICE Federal Communications Commission 445 12th Street, S.W. Washington, D.C. 20554 News Media Information 202 / 418-0500 Fax-On-Demand 202 / 418-2830 TTY 202 / 418-2555 Internet: http://www.fcc.gov ftp.fcc.gov h� $ h� tm � d � � - � tm � � � h� h� h� h� h� F� h� h� h� $ �����PNG > �!�R>^��S�S߿�"K�k������er4
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3007A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3007A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3007A1.txt
  • to file their reply comments. Therefore, we use our discretion to rule ex parte, and grant the Joint Petitioners' request for extension of time to file reply comments. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 5(c) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 154(i), 154(j) 155(c), and sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.45 and 1.46 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.45, and 1.46, the joint petition for extension of time filed by Qwest Corporation, BellSouth Telecommunications, Inc., and SBC Communications Inc. IS GRANTED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Tamara L. Preiss Chief, Pricing Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau See Pleading Cycle Established for Joint Petition of Qwest, BellSouth, and SBC for Expedited Forbearance
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3029A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3029A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3029A1.txt
  • 2003. This matter shall continue to be treated as a restricted proceeding in accordance with the Commission's ex parte rules. All other requirements discussed in the Virginia Arbitration Cost Order remain in effect. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 5(c) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. �� 154(i), 154(j) 155(c), and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.46 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.46, the request for extension of time filed by the AT&T and WorldCom IS GRANTED. By Order of the Bureau, _____________________________ Tamara L. Preiss Chief, Pricing Policy Division Petition of WorldCom, Inc., Pursuant to Section 252(e)(5) of the Communications Act for Preemption of the Jurisdiction of the Virginia State Corporation Commission
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3121A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3121A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3121A1.txt
  • section 5301 that no officer or five percent (5%) owner is in violation of the Anti-Drug Abuse Act of 1988.'' See ACNI Further Comments at 20; see also infra note 216. In effect, the ACNI Further Comments are an untimely petition to deny the underlying Applications, unaccompanied by a motion to accept a late-filed pleading. See 47 C.F.R. �� 1.45, 1.46. Although we have read and considered the ACNI Further Comments, we find nothing in the pleading that furthers our analysis of this transaction. See ACNI Second Supplemental Letter, supra note 46, at 2-3. We dismiss this argument and other arguments concerning the Second Amendment as mooted by the withdrawal of Hutchison Telecommunications Ltd. from the Purchase Agreement and the substitution
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3430A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3430A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3430A1.txt
  • Docket Nos. 01-338, 96-98 and 98-147 (filed Oct. 22, 2003). MCI supports the ALTS's request for an extension of time. Letter from Kimberly A. Scardino, Director, Federal Advocacy, MCI, to William F. Maher, Chief, Wireline Competition Bureau, Federal Communications Commission, CC Docket Nos. 01-338, 96-98 and 98-147 (filed Oct. 27, 2003). Id. at 1. Id. at 2. 47 C.F.R. � 1.46(a). BellSouth Opposition to Motion for Extension of Time, CC Docket Nos. 01-338, 96-98 and 98-147 (filed Oct. 24, 2003). (continued....) Federal Communications Commission DA 03-3430 Federal Communications Commission DA 03-3430 �@��� �@��� [ \ ^ m r h h @& ... � � h q t � t" �Tru Macros" Remand(), "ject. W' ?!'?!?!?!teQ ` �.E �.E c��� �.E ˃
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3621A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3621A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3621A1.txt
  • of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 154(i), 309, and Section 74.912 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 74.912, that the Petition to Deny filed by Hispanic Information and Telecommunications Network against File No. BPLIF-951020HU IS DISMISSED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to Section 4(i) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. � 154(i) and Sections 1.46 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.46, that the Motions for Extension of Time filed by Ball State University on October 1, 1998, February 12, 1999, February 24, 1999 and by Hispanic Information and Telecommunications Network on March 15, 1999 ARE GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to Section 4(i) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-391A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-391A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-391A1.txt
  • to submit an interference analysis. We therefore reinstate Fortuna's modification application and direct the Division's Licensing and Technical Analysis Branch (Branch) to review such application make a determination whether Fortuna has sufficiently demonstrated circumstances warranting grant of its request for an extension of time to conduct the necessary interference analysis. In evaluating Fortuna's request, the Branch shall consider that Section 1.46(a) of the Commission's Rules states, ``It is the policy of the Commission that extensions of time shall not be routinely granted.'' In light of the passage of time since Fortuna filed its original modification application, we direct the Branch to return Fortuna's application and provide it with sixty days from the date of the return notice to supplement the record
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3947A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3947A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3947A1.txt
  • conditions that are just, reasonable, and nondiscriminatory, includes the duties to forecast future capacity utilization needs, adequately plan for them, and implement those plans so blockages do not occur. See Core Communications, Inc. v. Verizon Maryland Inc., File No. EB-01-MD-007, 18 FCC Rcd 7962, 7980, 7983, paras. 47, 53 (2003). See Final Proposed Language at 1-4 (Cavalier Proposed �� 1.12(b), 1.46, 1.48, 1.62(a), 1.87, 5.6.1, 5.6.6, 5.6.6.1, 5.6.6.2, 6.3.9, 7.2.2, Verizon Proposed �� 1.87, 5.6.1, 5.6.6, 5.6.6.1, 5.6.6.2, 6.3.9, 7.2.2). For purposes of Verizon's proposal, the ``originating Party'' is the Party delivering the traffic for termination. The ``receiving Party'' is the Party to which the originating Party delivers the traffic. See Final Proposed Language at 2-3 (Verizon Proposed �� 5.6.6.1, 5.6.6.2).
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-4028A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-4028A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-4028A1.txt
  • parte rules. All other requirements discussed in the Public Notice remain in effect. For further information please contact Theodore Burmeister, Attorney, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7400, TTY (202) 418-0484. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 5(c) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. �� 154(i), 154(j), 155(c), and sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.46 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.46, the motion for extension of time filed by CenturyTel, IS GRANTED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATION COMMISSION Eric N. Einhorn Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service, CC Docket No. 96-45, Motion for Extension of Time (December 12, 2003) (``Motion''). The current comment and reply comment
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-4059A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-4059A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-4059A1.txt
  • likely benefit from comments that include the commenters' reactions to the anticipated NANC recommendation on the porting interval. Accordingly, we extend the period in which comments may be filed in response to the Further Notice. Comments must now be filed by January 20, 2004, and reply comments by February 4, 2004. IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.46, 1.415 and 1.419 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.46, 1.415 and 1.419, interested parties may file comments on or before January 20, 2004, and reply comments on or before February 4, 2004. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Eric N. Einhorn Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau See Telephone Number Portability, CC Docket No. 95-116, Memorandum Opinion
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-4085A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-4085A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-4085A1.txt
  • motion the Media Bureau will grant an extension of the deadline for filing comments and reply comments in both proceedings to February 13, 2004 and March 15, 2004, respectively. IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to Sections 4(i), 4(j) and 5(c) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 154(i), 154(j) and 155(c), and Sections 0.61, 0.283, and 1.46 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.61, 0.283, and 1.46, the deadline for filing comments and reply comments in the above-captioned proceedings IS EXTENDED to the extent described herein. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION W. Kenneth Ferree Chief, Media Bureau Implementation of Section 304 of the Telecommunications Act of 1996, Commercial Availability of Navigation Devices and Compatibility Between Cable Systems and
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-4096A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-4096A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-4096A1.txt
  • time in rule making proceedings. However, we believe that providing more time will enable Navini and other entities to submit beneficial information to the record in this proceeding. Accordingly, we agree to extend the comment deadline. Pursuant to the authority in Sections 4(i) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. � 154(i) and Sections 0.31, 0.241 and 1.46 of the Commission's Rules, 47 CFR �� 0.31, 0.241 and 1.46, IT IS ORDERED that the time for filing comments in the above captioned proceeding IS EXTENDED from January 9, 2004 to January 23, 2004, and the time for filing reply comments IS EXTENDED from January 26, 2004 to February 7, 2004. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Edmond J. Thomas Chief Office
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-4111A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-4111A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-4111A1.txt
  • Request for Declaratory Ruling that State Commissions May Not Regulate Broadband Internet Access Services by Requiring BellSouth to Provide Such Services to CLEC Voice Customers, WC Docket No. 03-251, Public Notice, DA 03-3991 (rel. Dec. 16, 2003). NARUC Motion For Extension of Time, WC Docket No. 03-251 (filed Dec. 23, 2003). Id. at 1. Id. at 2. 47 C.F.R. � 1.46(a). 47 C.F.R. � 1.1206. (...continued from previous page) (continued....) Federal Communications Commission DA 03-4111 Federal Communications Commission DA 03-4111 5 6 I N \ � .� � F 8 E R j � � � ... � (c) � � � � � � � 8 E R j � � � � (c) � � � � � �
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-464A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-464A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-464A1.txt
  • on that date. By its own motion, the Media Bureau hereby grants an extension of the deadline for filing reply comments in this proceeding to Friday, February 21, 2003. IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to Sections 4(i), 4(j) and 5(c) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 154(i), 154(j) and 155(c), and Sections 0.61, 0.283, and 1.46 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.61, 0.283, and 1.46, the time for filing reply comments in the above-referenced proceeding IS EXTENDED as set forth herein. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION William Johnson Deputy Chief, Media Bureau Digital Broadcast Copy Protection, MB Docket No. 02-230, Order (rel. Jan. 3, 2002). (...continued from previous page) (continued....) Federal Communications Commission DA 03-464 Federal
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-570A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-570A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-570A1.txt
  • 309, and Sections 21.20(b)(4) and 21.902 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 21.20, 21.902, that the Licensing and Technical Analysis Branch SHALL DISMISS the application filed on May 10, 1996 by Satellite Microcable Corporation (File No. BMDP-19960510MK). IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to Section 4(i) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. � 154(i) and Sections 1.46 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.46, that the Motions for Extension of Time filed by Satellite Microcable Corporation ARE GRANTED. This action is taken under delegated authority pursuant to Sections 0.131 and 0.331 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.131, 0.331. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION D'wana R. Terry Chief, Public Safety and Private Wireless Division Wireless Telecommunications Bureau
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-635A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-635A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-635A1.txt
  • in accordance with the Commission's ex parte rules. All other requirements discussed in the Public Notice remain in effect. For further information, please contact Judith Nitsche, Pricing Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau, (202) 418-1540. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 5(c) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. �� 154(i), 154(j), 155(c), and sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.46 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.46, the request for extension of time filed by Mr. Al Inga IS GRANTED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Deena M. Shetler Deputy Chief, Pricing Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau See Further Comment Requested on the Joint Petition for Declaratory Ruling on the Assignment of Accounts (Traffic) Without the Associated CSTP II Plans
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-943A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-943A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-943A1.txt
  • in accordance with the Commission's ex parte rules. All other requirements discussed in the Public Notice remain in effect. For further information, please contact Judith Nitsche, Pricing Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau, (202) 418-1540. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 5(c) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. �� 154(i), 154(j), 155(c), and sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.46 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.46, the extension of time requested by AT&T and Mr. Al Inga IS GRANTED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Deena M. Shetler Deputy Chief, Pricing Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau See Further Comment Requested on the Joint Petition for Declaratory Ruling on the Assignment of Accounts (Traffic) Without the Associated CSTP II Plans
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1175A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1175A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1175A1.txt
  • end of the reply comment period on June 1, 2004. Based on the foregoing, we deny the parties' request for an extension of comment periods in the above captioned proceeding. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to section 4(i) and 4(j) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 154(i) and 154(j), and sections 0.31, 0.241, and 1.46 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.31, 0.241, and 1.46, the requests for extension of time to file comments in the above captioned proceeding are DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Edmond J. Thomas Chief, Office of Engineering and Technology In the Matter of Carrier Current Systems, including Broadband over Power Line Systems and Amendment of Part 15 regarding new requirements
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1245A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1245A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1245A1.txt
  • documents, such as statutes, Commission regulations, and prior Commission decisions. We are not persuaded that Mobex has demonstrated cause for postponement of the reply comment deadline. We note, however, that the Bureau may, in its discretion, consider written ex parte presentations, if filed within a reasonable period after the reply comment deadline. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, pursuant to Section 1.46 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.46, the Emergency Motion for Extension of Time of Mobex Communications, Inc. is DENIED. This action is taken pursuant to authority delegated by Section 0.131 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 0.131. Sincerely, William W. Huber Associate Chief Auctions and Spectrum Access Division Wireless Telecommunications Bureau cc: Mr. Warren Havens 2509 Stuart
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1552A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1552A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1552A1.txt
  • an opportunity for effective consideration and comment and did not provide any compelling reason which would warrant a re-issue of our proposals on interference mitigation set forth in the NPRM. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to section 4(i) and 4(j) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 154(i) and 154(j), and sections 0.31, 0.241, and 1.46 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.31, 0.241, and 1.46, the Motion of NAC/Amherst IS GRANTED, IN PART, and the deadline for filing reply comments in the above captioned proceeding IS EXTENDED to June 22, 2004. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Edmond J. Thomas Chief, Office of Engineering and Technology In the Matter of Carrier Current Systems, including Broadband over Power
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1685A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1685A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1685A1.txt
  • to facilitate communications. See Public Notice, ``Wireline Competition Bureau Extends Comment Deadlines for SBC's `IP-Platform Services' Forbearance Petition,'' DA 04-899 (rel. Mar. 30, 2004). See CompTel/ASCENT's Motion for Extension of Time, WC Docket Nos. 04-29, 04-36 (filed June 8, 2004). See id. at 2. Parties have submitted over 150 initial comments in these two proceedings. See id. 47 C.F.R. � 1.46(a). PUBLIC NOTICE Federal Communications Commission 445 12th St., S.W. Washington, D.C. 20554 News Media Information 202 / 418-0500 Internet: http://www.fcc.gov TTY: 1-888-835-5322 � � m n p � � � � � ��PNG r v ��"r�9 I'6� �d�Y�͆aX ���; Wh� �X,�aX���y�]\\.W`h���va6l! �v"]�V�at�������-``````�"m(c)x<��G�<���={-N��J%t�<== �"""x ҍ� � ��(c)���!��'' �R)&� �A�� "���\��v`` � 6� �� �� �Year z �
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1820A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1820A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1820A1.txt
  • 98-170, filed March 30, 2004. National Association of State Utility Consumer Advocates (NASUCA) Petition for Declaratory Ruling Regarding Truth-In-Billing and Billing Format, CG Docket No. 04-208, Public Notice, 69 Fed. Reg. 33021 (June 14, 2004). Id. NASUCA Motion for Extension of Time, CG Docket No. 04-208 (filed June 11, 2004) Id. at 2. Id. at 2. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.46 (a). (...continued from previous page) (continued....) Federal Communications Commission DA 04-1820 Federal Communications Commission DA 04-1820 �@��� �@��� �@��� �@��� �@��� F �
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2002A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2002A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2002A1.txt
  • days for the filing of their comments and reply comments herein. A thirty day extension will result in a more thorough factual record and analysis of the issues. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to Sections 4(i), 4(j) and 5(c) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 154(i), 154(j) and 155(c), and Sections 0.61, 0.283, and 1.46 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.61, 0.283, and 1.46, the date for the filing of comments in MB Docket No. 04-210 is extended until August 11, 2004, and the date for filing reply comments herein is extended until September 7, 2004. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION W. Kenneth Ferree Chief, Media Bureau Public Notice DA 04-1497, Media Bureau Seeks Comment
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2025A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2025A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2025A1.txt
  • of one week for the filing of their comments and reply comments herein. The extensions will result in a more thorough factual record and analysis of the issues. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to Sections 4(i), 4(j) and 5(c) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 154(i), 154(j) and 155(c), and Sections 0.61, 0.283, and 1.46 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.61, 0.283, and 1.46, the date for the filing of comments in MB Docket No. 04-207 is extended until July 15, 2004, and the date for filing reply comments herein is extended until July 30, 2004. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION William H. Johnson Deputy Chief, Media Bureau Public Notice DA 04-1454, Comment Requested On
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2073A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2073A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2073A1.txt
  • should provide some assistance to these parties completing the record in this proceeding. At the same time, the proceeding will not be unduly delayed in any significant respect. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to Sections 4(i), 4(j) and 5(c) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 154(i), 154(j) and 155(c), and Sections 0.61, 0.283, and 1.46 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.61, 0.283, and 1.46, the date for the filing of Reply Comments in MM Docket No. 99-325 is extended until August 2, 2004. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION W. Kenneth Ferree Chief, Media Bureau Digital Audio Broadcasting Systems and Their Impact on the Terrestrial Radio Broadcast Service, MM Docket No. 99-325, FCC 04-99 (rel. April
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2256A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2256A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2256A1.txt
  • time for the preparation of pleadings. This extension will result in a more comprehensive factual record, especially from small broadcasters who have a significant stake in this proceeding. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to Sections 4(i), 4(j) and 5(c) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 154(i), 154(j) and 155(c), and Sections 0.61, 0.283, and 1.46 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.61, 0.283, and 1.46, the Motion for Extension of Time filed by the Arizona and Kentucky Broadcaster Associations is GRANTED, IN PART. The date for filing comments in MB Docket No. 04-232 is extended until August 27, 2004 and the date for reply comments is extended until September 27, 2004. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2332A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2332A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2332A1.txt
  • of the issues and provide parties with the opportunity to respond to matters raised in the Media Bureau's symposium on A La Carte scheduled for July 29, 2004. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to Sections 4(i), 4(j) and 5(c) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 154(i), 154(j) and 155(c), and Sections 0.61, 0.283, and 1.46 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.61, 0.283, and 1.46, the date for filing reply comments in MB Docket No. 04-207 is extended until August 13, 2004. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION W. Kenneth Ferree Chief, Media Bureau Public Notice DA 04-1454, Comment Requested On A La Carte and Themed Tier Programming and Pricing Options for Program Distribution on Cable Television
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2440A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2440A1.pdf
  • , Competition Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau, (202) 418-1471. - FCC - See Public Notice, ``Pleading Cycle Established for Comments on Qwest's Petition for Forbearance in the Omaha Metropolitan Statistical Area,'' DA 04-1869 (rel. June 25, 2004). See CompTel/ASCENT's Motion for Extension of Time, WC Docket No. 04-223 (filed July 29, 2004). Id. at 2. Id. Id. 47 C.F.R. � 1.46(a). PUBLIC NOTICE Federal Communications Commission 445 12th St., S.W. Washington, D.C. 20554 News Media Information 202 / 418-0500 Internet: http://www.fcc.gov TTY: 1-888-835-5322 6 7 8 A K f n � /� � � � � � ��PNG r v ��"r�9 I'6� �d�Y�͆aX ���; Wh� �X,�aX���y�]\\.W`h���va6l! �v"]�V�at�������-``````�"m(c)x<��G�<���={-N��J%t�<== �"""x ҍ� � ��(c)���!��'' �R)&� �A�� "���\��v`` � 6� �� � z �
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2457A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2457A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2457A1.txt
  • issues, this extension will result in a more comprehensive factual record. At the same time, the proceeding will not be unduly delayed by granting the extension requests. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to Sections 4(i), 4(j), and 5(c) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 154(i), 154(j), and 155(c), and also Sections 0.61, 0.283, and 1.46 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.61, 0.283, and 1.46, the motions for extension of time filed by the National Association of Broadcasters, the Illini Media Company, and the Media Access Project, et al., ARE GRANTED. The date for filing comments in MB Docket No. 04-233 is extended until November 1, 2004, and the date for reply comments is
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-260A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-260A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-260A1.txt
  • for filing oppositions in both proceedings to March 10, 2004. Replies to the oppositions will be due within 10 days after the time for filing oppositions have expired. IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to Sections 4(i), 4(j) and 5(c) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 154(i), 154(j) and 155(c), and Sections 0.61, 0.283, 1.3, and 1.46 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.61, 0.283, 1.3, and 1.46, the deadlines for filing comments and replies in the above-captioned proceedings ARE EXTENDED to the extent described herein. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION W. Kenneth Ferree Chief, Media Bureau Implementation of Section 304 of the Telecommunications Act of 1996, Commercial Availability of Navigation Devices and Compatibility Between Cable Systems and
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2655A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2655A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2655A1.txt
  • 30 days is sufficient for these purposes. We also find, however, that 180 days would unduly delay the continuation of this significant proceeding. Accordingly, we will provide 90 additional days. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to section 4(i) and 4(j) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 154(i) and 154(j), and sections 0.31, 0.241, and 1.46 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.31, 0.241, and 1.46, the deadline for filing comments in the above-captioned proceeding is extended from September 1, 2004 to November 30, 2004, and that the deadline for filing reply comments is extended from October 1, 2004 to December 30, 2004. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Edmond J. Thomas Chief, Office of Engineering and Technology
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-268A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-268A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-268A1.txt
  • Docket No. 96-128, Joint Motion to Extend Time for Filing Public Comments filed by Evercom Systems, T-NETIX, and Corrections Corp. on January 26, 2004. Joint Motion to Extend Time for Filing Public Comments at 2. Joint Motion to Extend Time for Filing Public Comments at 1. Joint Motion to Extend Time for Filing Public Comments at 5. 47 C.F.R. � 1.46(a). 47 C.F.R. � 1.1206. (...continued from previous page) (continued....) Federal Communications Commission DA 04-268 Federal Communications Commission DA 04-268 h.i h.i h.i h.i h.i h.i h.i h.i h.i P Q S � � h.i h.i h.i h.i h.i h.i h.i h.i h.i h.i F � 0 .i �
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-273A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-273A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-273A1.txt
  • Carey Chief, Competition Policy Division Commission Seeks Comment on Application for Acquisition of Assets of Allegiance Telecom, Inc. By Qwest Communications International Inc., WC Docket No. 04-13, Public Notice, DA 04-136 (rel. Jan. 21, 2004). Eschelon Motion to Extend or Postpone Comment Period, WC Docket No. 04-13 (filed Feb. 2, 2004). Id. at 2. Id. at 2-3. 47 C.F.R. � 1.46(a). We note that on February 3, 2004, the Applicants filed in opposition to Eschelon's request to extend the pleading cycle. See Joint Opposition to Motion to Extend or Postpone Comment Period, WC Docket 04-13 (filed Feb. 3, 2004). 47 C.F.R. � 1.1206. (...continued from previous page) (continued....) Federal Communications Commission DA 04-273 Federal Communications Commission DA 04-273 F } ~
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2845A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2845A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2845A1.txt
  • a more thorough record and analysis of the issues. The extensions will provide all parties, including academia, with the opportunity to respond to matters raised in the NOI. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to Sections 4(i), 4(j) and 5(c) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 154(i), 154(j) and 155(c), and Sections 0.61, 0.283, and 1.46 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.61, 0.283, and 1.46, the date for filing comments in MB Docket No. 04-261 is extended until October 15, 2004 and the date for filing reply comments is extended until November 15, 2004. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION W. Kenneth Ferree Chief, Media Bureau Violent Television Programming And Its Impact on Children, MB Docket No.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2996A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2996A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2996A1.txt
  • a full record on the factual and legal issues raised in the Notice, including the information sought on the terms and conditions of existing TV JSAs. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to Sections 4(i), 4(j) and 5(c ) of he Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 154(i), 154(j) and 155(c ), and Sections 0.61, 0.283, and 1.46 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.6, 0.283, and 1.46, the date for filing comments in MB Docket No. 04-256 is extended until October 27, 2004, and the date for filing reply comments is extended to November 30, 2004. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION W. Kenneth Ferree Chief Media Bureau In the Matter of Rules and Policies Concerning Attribution of Joint
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3202A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3202A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3202A1.txt
  • ex parte rules. All other requirements discussed in the NPRM remain in effect. For further information, please contact Jeremy D. Marcus, Pricing Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau, (202) 418-1520. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 5(c) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 154(i), 154(j) 155(c), and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.46 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.46, the Joint Motion for Extension of Time filed by BellSouth, SBC, and Verizon IS GRANTED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Tamara L. Preiss Chief, Pricing Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau National Exchange Carrier Association Petition to Amend Section 69.104 of the Commission's Rules, WC Docket No. 04-259, RM-10603, Order Granting Petition for
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-324A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-324A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-324A1.txt
  • parties will . . . submit the resulting amendments . . . by March 10, 2004.'' Finally, because neither AT&T nor WorldCom opposes the Motion, granting the extension will not prejudice any party. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 5(c) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. �� 154(i), 154(j) 155(c), and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.46 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.46, the request for an extension of time filed by Verizon Virginia, Inc. IS GRANTED. By Order of the Pricing Policy Division, __________________________ Tamara L. Preiss Chief, Pricing Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Petition of WorldCom, Inc. Pursuant to Section 252(e)(5) of the Communications Act for Preemption of the Jurisdiction of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3278A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3278A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3278A1.txt
  • proceeding by January 4, 2005. Accordingly, given the importance of adopting final rules as quickly as possible, the Bureau cannot countenance the delay that would attend any extension of the reply comment filing deadline. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 5(c) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. �� 154(i), 154(j), 155(c), and sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.46 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.46, the request for extension of time filed by NASUCA IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Michelle M. Carey Deputy Chief, Wireline Competition Bureau See Unbundled Access to Network Elements, CC Docket No. 01-338, WC Docket No. 04-313, Order and Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (rel. Aug. 20, 2004) (Interim Order and NPRM).
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3619A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3619A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3619A1.txt
  • IS GRANTED. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the date for filing an Application For Review regarding the Bureau's decision in Parra IS EXTENDED to December 17, 2004. This action is taken pursuant to delegated authority found in Sections 4(i) and 303(r) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. Sections 154(i) and 303(r), and Section 0.204(b), 0.283 and 1.46 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. Sections 0.204(b), 0.283, and 1.46 FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION W. Kenneth Ferree Chief, Media Bureau Federal Communications Commission DA 04-3619 Federal Communications Commission DA 04-3619 � �@��� �@��� < _ ` �
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3657A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3657A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3657A1.txt
  • filed, this extension will result in a more comprehensive factual record. At the same time, the proceeding will not be unduly delayed by granting the extension requests. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to Sections 4(i), 4(j), and 5(c) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 154(i), 154(j), and 155(c), and also Sections 0.61, 0.283, and 1.46 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.61, 0.283, and 1.46, the request for extension of time filed by the National Association of Broadcasters IS GRANTED. The date for filing reply comments in MB Docket No. 04-233 is extended until January 3, 2005. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Robert H. Ratcliffe Deputy Chief, Media Bureau See Broadcast Localism, 19 FCC Rcd 12,425
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3676A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3676A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3676A1.txt
  • larger number of affected licensees thereby developing a consensus-based comprehensive band reconfiguration schedule. Accordingly, the requested extension should facilitate- rather than delay-the parties' meeting the thirty-six month deadline set forth in the 800 MHz R&O. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED pursuant to Sections 4(i) and 5(c)(1) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 154(i), 155 and Sections 1.46 and 1.925 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.46, 1.925 that Section 90.677 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. �90.677, IS WAIVED and the extension request filed by the 800 MHz Transition Administrator on November 12, 2004, IS GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the deadline for the Transition Administrator to submit a reconfiguration schedule detailing when band reconfiguration
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3682A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3682A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3682A1.txt
  • in this rule making in allowing parties to provide detailed analysis of the comments, we will extend the time for filing reply comments by two weeks, as requested by DoJ. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to section 4(i) and 4(j) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 154(i) and 154(j), and sections 0.31, 0.241, and 1.46 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.31, 0.241, and 1.46, the deadline for filing reply comments is extended from December 7, 2004 to December 21, 2004. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Edmond J. Thomas Chief, Office of Engineering and Technology See Notice of Proposed Rule Making and Declaratory Ruling, ET Docket No. 04-295, 19 FCC Rcd 15676 (2004). 69 Fed. Reg.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3820A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3820A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3820A1.txt
  • In this case, as noted, the deadline for filing reply comments was November 8, 2004. The Extension Request was filed two days after this date, and Havens neither requested nor demonstrated justification for a waiver to permit the filing of an untimely extension request. We therefore dismiss the Extension Request as untimely. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that pursuant to Sections 1.46(b) and 1.415(e) of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.46(b), 1.415(e), the Request to Extend Reply Comment Period filed by Warren Havens, Telesaurus Holdings GB, LLC, Telesaurus-VPC, LLC (TVL) and AMTS Consortium, LLC on November 10, 2004, IS DISMISSED. This action is taken under delegated authority pursuant to Sections 0.131 and 0.331 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.131,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3988A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3988A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3988A1.txt
  • Invited on Petition for Forbearance Filed by BellSouth Telecommunications, Inc. Regarding Incumbent LEC Provision of Broadband,'' DA 04-3507 (rel. Nov. 3, 2004). See Letter from L. Barbee Ponder IV, BellSouth, to Marlene H. Dortch, Secretary, FCC, WC Docket No. 04-405 (filed Dec. 17, 2004). We treat BellSouth's Ex Parte presentation as a motion for extension of time filed under rule 1.46(b). 47 C.F.R. � 1.46(b). See id. 47 C.F.R. � 1.46(a). PUBLIC NOTICE Federal Communications Commission 445 12th St., S.W. Washington, D.C. 20554 News Media Information 202 / 418-0500 Internet: http://www.fcc.gov TTY: 1-888-835-5322 � � h h 2 < � � � � � � � � (R) � � � � � � � � � � � � �
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-4013A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-4013A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-4013A1.txt
  • solutions to interference issues. We are not persuaded, however, that a 45 day extension is warranted to accomplish this purpose. Accordingly, we will provide 30 additional days for reply comments. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to section 4(i) and 4(j) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 154(i) and 154(j), and sections 0.31, 0.241, and 1.46 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.31, 0.241, and 1.46, the deadline for filing reply comments in the above-captioned proceeding is extended from December 30, 2004 to January 31, 2005. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Edmond J. Thomas Chief, Office of Engineering and Technology See Notice of Proposed Rule Making in ET Docket Nos. 02-380 and 04-186, 19 FCC Rcd 10018
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-4030A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-4030A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-4030A1.txt
  • proceeding and the bases for the extension request. Therefore, we will extend the deadline for filing comments in this proceeding until January 7, 2005, and for filing reply comments until January 18, 2005. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 5(c) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. �� 154(i), 154(j), 155(c), and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.46 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.46, the pleading cycle established in this matter shall be modified as follows: Comments Due: January 7, 2005 Reply Comments Due: January 18, 2005 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Motion for Extension of Time of COMPTEL/ASCENT ALLIANCE is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part, as set forth herein. FEDERAL
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-42A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-42A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-42A1.txt
  • Local Competition Provisions of the Telecommunications Act of 1996, Deployment of Wireline Services Offering Advanced Telecommunications Capability, CC Docket Nos. 01-338, 96-98, 98-147, Request of the Public Utility Commission of Oregon for an Extension of the Deadline for Filing a Petition Pursuant to 47 C.F.R. � 51.319(d)(5)(i) (filed Dec. 29, 2003). Id. at 2. Id. at 3. 47 C.F.R. � 1.46(a). Accordingly, we expect that the competitive LECs will transition their end-user customers served by DS1 and above capacity loops and unbundled local circuit switching to an alternative arrangement within the 90-day period established by our rules, unless a longer period is necessary to comply with a ``change of law'' provision in an applicable interconnection agreement. 47 C.F.R. � 51.319(3)(ii)(A). We
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-579A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-579A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-579A1.txt
  • Stations on Board Vessels in the 5925-6425 MHz/3700-4200 MHz Bands and 14.0-14.5 GHz/11.7-12.2 GHz Bands ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) IB Docket No. 02-10 Adopted: February 27, 2004 Released: March 01, 2004 Reply Comment Date: March 24, 2004 By the Chief, Policy Division, International Bureau: On February 25, 2004, Maritime Telecommunications Network, Inc. (``MTN''), pursuant to Section 1.46 of the Commission's Rules, filed a ``Motion for Extension of Time'' requesting the Commission to extend the reply comment filing deadline in this proceeding to March 24, 2004. MTN states granting MTN's extension request is appropriate given the complexity of the issues at stake, the number of commenting parties, and past Commission practice. MTN further states that the instant proceeding
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-669A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-669A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-669A1.txt
  • granting the parties the full extension of time they request (for a second time), we fully expect them to complete their negotiations and to submit the required interconnection agreements by March 24, 2004. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 5(c) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. �� 154(i), 154(j) 155(c), and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.46 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.46, the request for an extension of time filed by Verizon Virginia Inc., AT&T Communications of Virginia Inc., and WorldCom, Inc. IS GRANTED. By Order of the Pricing Policy Division, __________________________ Tamara L. Preiss Chief, Pricing Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Petition of WorldCom, Inc. Pursuant to Section 252(e)(5) of the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-670A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-670A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-670A1.txt
  • Public Notice). Letter from James Stenger, Esq. to Marlene H. Dortch, Secretary, Federal Communications Commission (filed Nov. 25, 2002). Wireless Telecommunications Bureau Seeks to Verify ITFS, MDS, and MMDS License Status And Pending Applications, Order, 17 FCC Rcd 24620 (WTB PSPWD 2002). Id. See Waiver Request. Id. at 2. Id. at 2-3. 47 C.F.R. � 21.19. Id. 47 C.F.R. � 1.46(b). Petition at 4-5, citing Amendment of Parts 2, 21, 74 and 94, Order on Reconsideration, 98 FCC 2d 129, 134 � 14 (1984) (1984 Reconsideration Order). Petition at 4 and 6. Petition at 7-10. Id. at 10. In the Matter of Amendment of Parts 2, 21, 74 and 94 of the Commission's Rules and Regulations in Regard to Frequency Allocation
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-774A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-774A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-774A1.txt
  • 96-128, Motion for Extension of Time filed by Martha Wright et al. on March 16, 2004 (Extension of Time Motion). Extension of Time Motion at 2. Extension of Time Motion at 2. Letter from Stephanie A. Joyce, Counsel for T-NETIX, Inc. to Marlene H. Dortch, Secretary, FCC (filed March 17, 2004) (T-NETIX Letter). T-NETIX Letter at 1. 47 C.F.R. � 1.46(a). 47 C.F.R. � 1.1206. (...continued from previous page) (continued....) Federal Communications Commission DA 04-774 Federal Communications Commission DA 04-774 h.i h.i h.i h.i h.i h.i h.i h.i h.i � � ) 9 ? ... � � � h.i h.i h.i h.i h.i h.i h.i h.i h.i h.i h.i h.i h.i h.i h.i � F & ' ( ) * ?
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-992A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-992A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-992A1.txt
  • an opposition on October 2, 2001. Opposition to Petition for Reconsideration (filed Oct. 2, 2001). On October 9, 2001, WCG filed a request of an extension of time until Oct. 22, 2001, to respond to Paradise's opposition. Motion for Extension of Time (filed Oct. 9, 2001). We find good cause for that motion and grant the motion. 47 C.F.R. � 1.46(a). WCG filed a reply on October 22, 2001. Reply to Opposition to Petition for Reconsideration (filed Oct. 22, 2001). Paradise filed a ``Motion to Accept Rebuttal Pleading'' and ``Rebuttal'' on November 19, 2001. We deny the ``Motion to Accept Rebuttal Pleading'' because the Rebuttal addresses issues that are not pertinent to our decision in this proceeding. See Second Petition at
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1015A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1015A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1015A1.txt
  • systems and wireless devices onboard aircraft. We therefore extend by 45 days the comments and reply comments deadlines in this proceeding to May 26, 2005 and June 27, 2005, respectively. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to sections 4(i) and 4(j) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 154(i) and 154(j), and sections 0.131, 0.331, and 1.46 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.131, 0.331, and 1.46, the deadline for filing comments in response to the Notice of Proposed Rulemaking is extended to May 26, 2005, and the deadline for filing reply comments is extended to June 27, 2005. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Scott D. Delacourt Deputy Chief, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau Amendment of the Commission's Rules to
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1084A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1084A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1084A1.txt
  • adversely affect implementation of the 800 MHz band reconfiguration. We therefore extend the comment and reply comment deadlines in this proceeding to May 18, 2005 and June 2, 2005, respectively. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to sections 4(i) and 4(j) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 154(i) and 154(j), and sections 0.131, 0.331, and 1.46 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.131, 0.331, and 1.46, the deadline for filing comments in response to the Notice of Proposed Rulemaking is extended to May 18, 2005, and the deadline for filing reply comments is extended to June 2, 2005. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Catherine W. Seidel Acting Chief, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau Amendment of Part 90 of the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1098A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1098A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1098A1.txt
  • interest, convenience, and necessity. III. DISCUSSION A. Late-Filed Comments Comments on the assignment applications pending before us were due 30 days after they were placed on public notice, February 25, 2005. ViaSat filed its Comments, together with a motion for leave to file late-filed comments, on March 16, 2005, 19 days after the due date. As stated in the Section 1.46(a) of the Commission's rules, it is the policy of the Commission that motions to accept late-filed pleadings are not to be granted routinely. ViaSat does not address the Commission's policy on this issue. Therefore, we find that ViaSat does not provide an adequate basis for making an exception to the Commission's policy. Instead of addressing the Commission's policy regarding motions
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-11A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-11A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-11A1.txt
  • a petition for forbearance, pursuant to 47 U.S.C. � 160(c), pertaining to xDSL services. On November 16, 2004, the Wireline Competition Bureau released a public notice establishing comment and reply dates for Qwest's petition of January 5, 2005, and February 7, 2005, respectively. On December 28, 2004, the Washington Bureau for ISP Advocacy (WBIA) filed a motion pursuant to section 1.46 of the Commission's rules asking the Commission to extend the period for all parties to file comments and replies to January 20, 2005, and February 22, 2005, respectively. WBIA states that an extension is necessary due to holiday and vacation schedules typical for this time of year and the large number of proceedings currently open for comment. The Bureau hereby
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1537A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1537A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1537A1.txt
  • a ``Statement for the Record'' on June 9, 2004 (requesting, inter alia, that the Commission examine Clear Channel's basic character qualifications). Clear Channel filed an Opposition to the Objection on January 10, 2005. GGCB filed an Opposition to the Petition to Deny or Designate for Hearing on June 2, 2004 (``GGCB Renewal Opposition''). On June 22, 2004, pursuant to Section 1.46 of the Commission's rules (47 C.F.R. � 1.46), WJZD filed a Motion to Accept Late-Filed Pleading, or, in the Alternative, Motion for One Day Extension of Time. WJZD filed a Reply to Opposition to Petition to Deny or Designate for Hearing on June 23, 2004. Motions for extension of time are not routinely granted. Nevertheless, because WJZD's delay of one
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1712A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1712A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1712A1.txt
  • to respond meaningfully to the relevant issues raised in the Notice and the record, we extend, by forty-five days, the reply comments deadline in this proceeding to August 11, 2005. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to sections 4(i) and 4(j) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 154(i) and 154(j), and sections 0.131, 0.331, and 1.46 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.131, 0.331, and 1.46, the deadline for filing reply comments in response to the Notice of Proposed Rulemaking is extended to August 11, 2005. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Scott D. Delacourt Deputy Chief, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau See CTIA Request for Extension of Reply Comment Deadline, filed June 13, 2005 (CTIA Extension Request). Amendment of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1723A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1723A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1723A1.txt
  • 2005, respectively. 4. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that MAP's Request for Extension of Time to File Comments and Reply Comments in the above-captioned proceeding is GRANTED. 5. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to Sections 4(i), 4(j) and 5(c) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 154(i), 154(j) and 155 (c), and Sections 0.61, 0.283, and 1.46 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.6, 0.283, and 1.46, the date for filing comments in MM Docket No. 92-264 is extended until August 8, 2005, and the date for filing reply comments is extended to September 9, 2005. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Donna C. Gregg Acting Chief, Media Bureau In the Matter of the Commission's Cable Horizontal and Vertical
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-177A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-177A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-177A1.txt
  • of time from January 25, 2005 to February 1, 2005 for filing reply comments is reasonable. Therefore, we will extend the deadline for filing reply comments in this proceeding until February 1, 2005. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 5(c) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. �� 154(i), 154(j), 155(c), and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.46 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.46, the time for filing reply comments in this matter is extended to February 1, 2005. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Tamara Preiss Chief, Pricing Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau See Pleading Cycle Established for the Independent Payphone Association of New York's Petition For Pre-emption and Declaratory Ruling Concerning Refund of Payphone Line
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1780A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1780A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1780A1.txt
  • is sufficiently integral to their applications to warrant the extension of time to allow the public adequate time to analyze and to comment on the submissions. 4. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to Sections 4(i), 4(j) and 5(c) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 154(i), 154(j) and 155(c ), and Sections 0.61, 0.283, and 1.46 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.61, 0.283, and 1.46, the date for filing comments and petitions to deny in MB Docket No. 05-192 is extended until July 21, 2005, and the date for filing responses to comments and oppositions to petitions is extended to August 5, 2005. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Donna C. Gregg Acting Chief, Media Bureau See
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1939A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1939A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1939A1.txt
  • Applications for Station WKVE, Semora, North Carolina, 18 FCC RCD 23411 (2003). Piedmont states that apparently the 2003 ownership report became available only on November 17, 2003, after Piedmont filed its Petition to Deny. Under Section 1.4(h) of the rules, Piedmont would be accorded three additional days - until November 21, 2003 -- to file its Reply. 47 C.F.R. � 1.46. Family Vision Ministries, Inc., 18 FCC Rcd 1418 n. 2 (2003). In its Reply, Piedmont claims that the representation of the owners of Southern's shares made in the 2003 Report is incorrect. Piedmont's Reply to the Opposition at 3-4. Section 1.45(c) of the Commission's rules states that ``[t]he reply shall be limited to matters raised in the opposition[]....'' We believe
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1983A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1983A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1983A1.txt
  • C.F.R. � 1.17 regarding submission of truthful written statemtents to the Commission). Piedmont states that apparently the 2003 ownership report became available only on November 17, 2003, after Piedmont filed its Petition to Deny. Under Section 1.4(h) of the rules, Piedmont would be accorded three additional days - until November 21, 2003 -- to file its Reply. 47 C.F.R. � 1.46. Family Vision Ministries, Inc., 18 FCC Rcd 1418 n. 2 (2003). KOLA, Inc., 11 FCC Rcd 14297 n.2 (1996). In its Reply, Piedmont claims that the representation of the owners of Southern's shares made in the 2003 Report is incorrect. Piedmont's Reply to the Opposition at 3-4. Section 1.45(c) of the Commission's rules states that ``[t]he reply shall be limited
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2051A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2051A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2051A1.txt
  • LLC (``EchoStar'') submitted late-filed comments and UNC filed a response thereto. However, EchoStar's offered neither an explanation for the lateness of its comments, nor a request for their acceptance. Section 1.415 of the Commission's Rules provides that comments in rule making proceedings ordinarily may not be filed after the deadline specified in the Notice of Proposed Rule Making, and Section 1.46 of the Rules states that such deadline may be extended only upon a showing that an emergency situation prevented the filing of timely comments. We find that EchoStar has not shown a sufficient justification to allow acceptance of its late-filed comments, and they, and the response thereto, will be dismissed. See, e.g., Cherry Valley and Cotton Plant, Arkansas, 14 FCC
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2253A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2253A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2253A1.txt
  • is warranted. We therefore extend by two weeks the comment and reply comment deadlines in this proceeding to August 22, 2005 and September 6, 2005, respectively. 4. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to Sections 4(i), 4(j) and 5(c) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 154(i), 154(j) and 155(c ), and Sections 0.61, 0.283, and 1.46 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.61, 0.283, and 1.46, the date for filing comments in MM Docket No. 99-25 is extended until August 22, 2005, and the date for filing reply comments is extended to September 6, 2005. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Donna C. Gregg Acting Chief, Media Bureau Creation of a Low Power Radio Service, 20 FCC Rcd
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2291A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2291A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2291A1.txt
  • REPLY COMMENTS IN APCC SERVICES, INC. PETITION FOR RECONSIDERATION OF THE WIRELINE COMPETITION BUREAU'S DECISION GRANTING THE DOMESTIC SECTION 214 APPLICATION FILED FOR ACQUISITION OF ASSETS OF TRANSTEL COMMUNICATIONS, INC., TEL AMERICA OF SALT LAKE CITY, INC., EXTELCOM, INC., TO UCN, INC. WC Docket No. 05-198 On August 15, 2005, APCC Services, Inc. (``APCC'') filed a motion pursuant to section 1.46 of the Commission's Rules to extend the period for filing a reply to the Joint Opposition of Tel America of Salt Lake City, Inc. and UCN, Inc. to the Petition filed by APCC for reconsideration of the Wireline Competition Bureau's decision to grant the domestic section 214 application filed for acquisition of assets of Transtel Communications, Inc., Tel America of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2335A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2335A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2335A1.txt
  • the resolution of the proceeding, are best served by an extension of the comment period. Therefore, we extend the time for the filing comments in response to the Public Notice from August 29, 2005, to September 28, 2005; and extend the reply comment date from September 13, 2005 to October 13, 2005. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that pursuant to Section 1.46 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.46, the request of the Massachusetts Port Authority to extend the deadline for filing comments and replies in response to the Public Notice is GRANTED. This action is taken under delegated authority pursuant to Sections 0.51 and 0.261 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R . �� 0.51, 0.261. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Bruce Franca
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2348A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2348A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2348A1.txt
  • sufficient time to review and reply to such filings. We therefore extend by 15 days the reply comment deadline in this proceeding to September 21, 2005. 4. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to Sections 4(i), 4(j) and 5(c) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 154(i), 154(j) and 155(c ), and Sections 0.61, 0.283, and 1.46 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.61, 0.283, and 1.46, the date for filing reply comments in MM Docket No. 99-25 is extended until September 21, 2005. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Donna C. Gregg Acting Chief, Media Bureau Creation of a Low Power Radio Service, 20 FCC Rcd 6763 (2005). The Further Notice was published in the Federal Register on
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2360A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2360A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2360A1.txt
  • sections 0.131 and 0.331 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.131, 0.331, the Request for Expedited Ruling filed by Aloha Partners, L.P. on April 5, 2005 is DISMISSED as moot. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to authority found in section 4(i) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. � 154(i), and sections 0.131, 0.331 and 1.46 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.131, 0.331, 1.46, the Request for Extension of Time to File Response filed by Aloha Partners, L.P. on April 14, 2005 is DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Lloyd W. Coward Deputy Chief, Mobility Division Wireless Telecommunications Bureau Aloha Partners, L.P. Request for Waiver of Section 27.60, Memorandum Opinion and Order, 20 FCC Rcd 3744
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2411A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2411A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2411A1.txt
  • response into this one Opposition.''). Reply to Opposition to Appeal of Local Rate Order or Petition for Declaratory Ruling (``Reply''), filed by Adelphia on March 29, 2005. Motion for Leave to Submit Late-Filed Reply to Opposition to Appeal of Local Rate Order or Petition for Declaratory Ruling (``Motion''), filed by Adelphia on March 29, 2005. Motion passim. 47 C.F.R. � 1.46(a). Motion at 1. 47 C.F.R. � 76.944(b). 47 U.S.C. �� 151 et seq. 47 U.S.C. � 543(a)(2). 47 U.S.C. � 543(b)(1); 47 C.F.R. � 76.922. 47 C.F.R. � 76.937(d); Falcon Classic Cable, 15 FCC Rcd 5717, 5720 (2000) � 10; Western Reserve Cablevision, Inc., 14 FCC Rcd 13391, 13398 (1999) � 12. 47 U.S.C. � 543(b)(5)(B); 47 C.F.R. � 76.944.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2425A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2425A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2425A1.txt
  • September 23, 2005. 4. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that MAP's Emergency Motion for Extension of Time to file reply comments in the above-captioned proceeding is GRANTED. 5. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to Sections 4(i), 4(j) and 5(c) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 154(i), 154(j) and 155 (c), and Sections 0.61, 0.283, and 1.46 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.6, 0.283, and 1.46, the date for filing reply comments in MM Docket No. 92-264 is extended until September 23, 2005. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Donna C. Gregg Acting Chief, Media Bureau In the Matter of the Commission's Cable Horizontal and Vertical Ownership Limits, 20 FCC Rcd 9374 (2005). In the Matter of the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2633A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2633A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2633A1.txt
  • until October 11, 2005. 4. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that NCTA's Motion for Extension of Time to file reply comments in the above-captioned proceeding is GRANTED. 5. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to Sections 4(i), 4(j) and 5(c) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 154(i), 154(j) and 155 (c), and Sections 0.61, 0.283, and 1.46 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.6, 0.283, and 1.46, the date for filing reply comments in MB Docket No. 05-255 is extended until October 11, 2005. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Donna C. Gregg Acting Chief, Media Bureau Annual Assessment of the Status of Competition in the Market for the Delivery of Video Programming, FCC 05-155 (rel. Aug. 12, 2005).
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2645A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2645A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2645A1.txt
  • negotiations at such meeting. We therefore extend the deadline for the first joint report regarding progress on the negotiation of a bidirectional agreement to October 14, 2005. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to Sections 4(i), 4(j) and 5(c) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 154(i), 154(j) and 155(c ), and Sections 0.61, 0.283, and 1.46 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.61, 0.283, and 1.46, the date by which the National Cable & Telecommunications Association and the Consumer Electronics Association must file a joint status report with the Commission to provide an update regarding progress on the negotiation of a bidirectional agreement and a software-based security agreement is extended until October 14, 2005. FEDERAL
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2974A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2974A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2974A1.txt
  • without causing undue delay to the Commission's consideration of the issues. 4. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that the Request for Extension of Time filed by the National Association of Broadcasters on November 15, 2005, IS GRANTED. Interested parties may file reply comments on or before December 16, 2005. 5. This action is taken pursuant to the authority provided in Section 1.46 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.46, and under delegated authority pursuant to Sections 0.141 and 0.361 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.141, 0.361. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Monica Desai, Chief Consumer & Governmental Affairs Bureau Closed Captioning of Video Programming, Telecommunications for the Deaf, Inc. Petition for Rulemaking, Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, CG Docket No. 05-231, 20
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3073A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3073A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3073A1.txt
  • Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit DA 05-3073 November 28, 2005 WIRELINE COMPETITION BUREAU GRANTS MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE OPPOSITION TO REQUEST FOR STAY IN THE COMMUNICATIONS ASSISTANCE FOR LAW ENFORCEMENT ACT AND BROADBAND ACCESS AND SERVICES PROCEEDING ET DOCKET NO. 04-295 On November 25, 2005, the United States Department of Justice (DOJ) filed a motion, pursuant to section 1.46(b) of the Commission's rules, to extend the deadline for responding to a pending request for stay of the Commission's First Report and Order in the Communications Assistance for Law Enforcement Act and Broadband Access and Services proceeding. DOJ seeks a two-day extension of the November 30, 2005 deadline for filing oppositions, to take into account that the seven-day period for
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3145A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3145A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3145A1.txt
  • WC Docket No. 05-281. This amended Petition incorporates errata to the September 30 Petition, which were filed on September 30 and October 4, 2005. See Pleading Cycle Established for Comments on ACS's Petition for Forbearance in the Anchorage, Alaska Local Exchange Carrier Study Area, WC Docket No. 05-281, DA 05-2709, Public Notice (rel. Oct. 14, 2005). See 47 C.F.R. � 1.46(a). See Petition of Qwest Corporation for Forbearance Pursuant to 47 U.S.C. � 160(c) in the Omaha Metropolitan Statistical Area, WC Docket No. 04-223, Memorandum Opinion and Order, FCC 05-170 (rel. Dec. 2, 2005). PUBLIC NOTICE Federal Communications Commission 445 12th St., S.W. Washington, D.C. 20554 News Media Information 202 / 418-0500 Internet: http://www.fcc.gov TTY: 1-888-835-5322 � � � " �
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3147A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3147A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3147A1.txt
  • Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit DA 05-3147 December 6, 2005 WIRELINE COMPETITION BUREAU GRANTS MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE REPLY COMMENTS IN THE COMMUNICATIONS ASSISTANCE FOR LAW ENFORCEMENT ACT AND BROADBAND ACCESS AND SERVICES PROCEEDING ET DOCKET NO. 04-295 On December 5, 2005, the United States Department of Justice (DOJ) filed a motion, pursuant to section 1.46(b) of the Commission's rules, to extend the deadline for filing reply comments in response to the Commission's Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking in the Communications Assistance for Law Enforcement Act and Broadband Access and Services proceeding. DOJ asks the Commission to extend the current December 12, 2005 deadline until December 21, 2005. Motions for extensions of time are not routinely
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3183A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3183A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3183A1.txt
  • will enable the Commission to obtain a more complete and well-developed record in this proceeding. Therefore, we are hereby extending the reply comment deadline from December 27, 2005 to January 26, 2006. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to authority found in section 4(i) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. � 154(i), and sections 0.331 and 1.46 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.331 and 1.46, the Request for 30-day extension of reply comment deadline IS GRANTED and the reply comment deadline for the Notice of Proposed Rulemaking in this proceeding is EXTENDED to January 26, 2006. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Catherine W. Seidel Acting Chief, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau See Automatic and Manual Roaming Obligations Pertaining to
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3218A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3218A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3218A1.txt
  • Opposition to Motion for Extension of Time, DA No. 05-3035 (dated Dec. 2, 2005). Id. at 2 (citing Wireless Telecommunications Bureau Seeks Comment on Association of American Railroads Petition for Modification of Licenses for Use in Advanced Train Control Systems and Positive Train Control Systems, Public Notice, 15 FCC Rcd 9133 (WTB PSPWD 2000)). Id. at 4. 47 C.F.R. � 1.46(a). PUBLIC NOTICE Federal Communications Commission 445 12th St., S.W. Washington, D.C. 20554 News Media Information 202 / 418-0500 Internet: http://www.fcc.gov TTY: 1-888-835-5322 7 8 E ��PNG r v ��"r�9 I'6� �d�Y�͆aX ���; Wh� �X,�aX���y�]\\.W`h���va6l! �v"]�V�at�������-``````�"m(c)x<��G�<���={-N��J%t�<== �"""x ҍ� � ��(c)���!��'' �R)&� �A�� "���\��v`` � 6� �� � �� * Z k - g n �Year z �
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3316A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3316A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3316A1.txt
  • deadline. We therefore grant the Companies' request and extend the comment and reply comment deadlines in this proceeding to January 20, 2006 and February 6, 2006, respectively. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to Sections 4(i), 4(j) and 5(c) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 154(i), 154(j) and 155(c ), and Sections 0.61, 0.283, and 1.46 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.61, 0.283, and 1.46, the date for filing comments in CS Docket No. 97-80 is extended until January 20, 2006, and the date for filing reply comments is extended to February 6, 2006. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Donna C. Gregg Chief, Media Bureau Implementation of Section 304 of the Telecommunications Act of 1996: Commercial
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-419A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-419A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-419A1.txt
  • numerous local broadcasters nationwide. We find that granting the Movant and others an additional 21 days to comment provides a necessary and sufficient amount of time to build a meaningful record. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to authority found in section 4(i) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. � 154(i), and sections 0.91, 0.331 and 1.46 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.331, 1.46, the joint Motion for Extension of Time IS GRANTED to establish a new comments deadline of March 10, 2005, and a new reply comments deadline of March 25, 2005. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Roger Noel Chief, Mobility Division Wireless Telecommunications Bureau Pleading Cycle Established for Qualcomm Incorporated Petition for Declaratory Ruling,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-41A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-41A1.txt
  • - with the response now due on January 10,2005. MSV Subsidiary had asserted that additional time would allow it to attempt to resolve its difference with the opposing parties. MSV Subsidiary now seeks to extend the time for filing its response for an additional thirty days, until February 10,2005. This is nearly three months past the original due date. Section 1.46(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. tj 1.46(a), states motions for extensions of time will not be granted routinely. In addition, Section 146(b) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. tj 1.46(b) requires that motions for extensions of time shall be filed seven days before the filing date. In an emergency situation, we may consider a late-filed motion for a brief
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-612A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-612A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-612A1.txt
  • to the Commission's Rules Regarding a Plan For Sharing the Costs of Microwave Relocation, WT Docket No. 95-157, First Report and Order and Further Notice of Proposed Rule Making, 11 FCC Rcd 8825, 8876 N. 194 (1996). Id at � 68. Id. 47 C.F.R. � 101.79(b). Extension requests should also be filed in accordance with the procedural requirements of Section 1.46(c) of the Commission's rules regarding Motions for extension of time. 47 C.F.R. � 1.46. PUBLIC NOTICE Federal Communications Commission 445 12th St., S.W. Washington, D.C. 20554 News Media Information 202 / 418-0500 Internet: http://www.fcc.gov TTY: 1-888-835-5322 u z { h5 { ~ ��PNG r v ��"r�9 I'6� �d�Y�͆aX ���; Wh� �X,�aX���y�]\\.W`h���va6l! �v"]�V�at�������-``````�"m(c)x<��G�<���={-N��J%t�<== �"""x ҍ� � ��(c)���!��'' �R)&� �A�� "���\��v`` �
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-627A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-627A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-627A1.txt
  • days for the filing of their reply comments. A fifteen day extension will result in a more complete discussion and analysis of the issues raised in the initial comments. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED THAT, PURSUANT TO Sections 4(i), 4(j), and 5(c) of Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 154(i), 154(j) and 155(c), and Sections 0.61, 0283, and 1.46 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.61, 0.283, and 1.46, the date for filing reply comments in MB Docket No. 05-28 is extended until March 31, 2005. FEDERAL COMMUNCIATIONS COMMISSION Deborah E. Klein Acting Chief, Media Bureau Media Bureau Seeks Comment For Inquiry Required By The Satellite Home Viewer Extension And Reauthorization Act On Rules Affecting Competition In The
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-678A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-678A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-678A1.txt
  • the wrong address and did not reach the correct one for 12 days, by which time counsel for the City had left the country for a week; and that counsel for Comcast has no objection to the requested extension. Motion at 1-2. Although Commission policy is that motions for extension of time shall not be routinely granted, 47 C.F.R. � 1.46(a), we find that the City has stated good grounds for the extension it requests and, absent objection, we grant the Motion. Reply to Opposition to Appeal of Local Rate Order (``Reply''), filed March 16, 2004. Form 1205 is the Commission form that cable operators use to calculate permitted rates for equipment and installation. 47 U.S.C. �� 151 et seq. 47
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-730A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-730A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-730A1.txt
  • Bureau or concerned issues not previously raised by the parties. In light of this procedural history, we do not find good cause to grant an additional extension of time. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 5(c) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 154(i), 154(j) 155(c), and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.46 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.46, the Motion of MCI, Inc. for Extension of Time to File Amendments to Interconnection Agreement IS DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to section 252(e)(1) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. � 252(e)(1), and the authority delegated pursuant to sections 0.91, 0.291, and 51.807 of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1033A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1033A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1033A1.txt
  • Proposed Rulemaking to Enhance Security and Authentication Standards for Access to CPNI, Public Notice, CC Docket No. 96-115, DA 06-840 (rel. Apr. 11, 2006); see also Comment and Reply Comment Dates Established for Notice of Proposed Rulemaking in Commission's Customer Proprietary Network Information Proceeding, CC Docket No. 96-115, DA 06-600, Public Notice (rel. Mar. 16, 2006). See 47 C.F.R. � 1.46(a). PUBLIC NOTICE Federal Communications Commission 445 12th St., S.W. Washington, D.C. 20554 News Media Information 202 / 418-0500 Internet: http://www.fcc.gov TTY: 1-888-835-5322 s u � & ' . 2 ; A M V V c s � � � � � � � � � 6u � ��PNG r v ��"r�9 I'6� �d�Y�͆aX ���; Wh� �X,�aX���y�]\\.W`h���va6l! �v"]�V�at�������-``````�"m(c)x<��G�<���={-N��J%t�<== �"""x ҍ� �
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1088A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1088A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1088A1.txt
  • weeks should be sufficient to allow RFD-TV and any other party to obtain any necessary information and to prepare appropriate comments. Therefore, we will extend the time for filing comments and responses to the Farm Journal Petition until June 5, 2006 and for filing replies until June 16, 2006. 3. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant Sections 0.283, 1.2 and 1.46 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.283, 1.2, and 1.46, the date for filing comments and responses in MB Docket No. 06-92 is extended until June 5, 2006, and the date for filing replies is extended to June 16, 2006. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Donna C. Gregg Chief, Media Bureau (continued....) Federal Communications Commission DA 06-1088 � �@��� �@��� �@���
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1544A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1544A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1544A1.txt
  • appropriate to the issues raised in the petitions. We therefore deny COMPTEL's and Embarq's motions to the extent they seek extensions beyond August 17, 2006 for comments and August 31, 2006 for replies. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 5(c) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. �� 154(i), 154(j), 155(c), and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.46 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.46, the Motion for Extension of Time filed by COMPTEL and the Motion for Consolidation and Extension of Time filed by Embarq are GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART, as specified above. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Ren�e R. Crittendon Chief, Competition Policy Division Qwest Petition for Forbearance Under 47 U.S.C. �
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1617A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1617A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1617A1.txt
  • of the proceeding. Accordingly, we extend the deadlines for filing comments and reply comments in response to the Second Further Notice until September 20, 2006 and October 20, 2006, respectively. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to sections 4(i) and 4(j) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 154(i) and 154(j), and sections 0.131, 0.331, and 1.46 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.131, 0.331, and 1.46, the deadline for filing comments in response to the Second Further Notice is extended to September 20, 2006, and the deadline for filing reply comments is extended to October 20, 2006. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Catherine W. Seidel Acting Chief, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau Implementation of the Commercial Spectrum Enhancement Act
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1730A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1730A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1730A1.txt
  • importance of the issues raised in the Missoula Plan to NARUC and its member state commissions, and we agree that the additional time we grant here will help ensure their ``continued full participation.'' ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 5(c) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. �� 154(i), 154(j), 155(c), and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.46 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.46, the pleading cycle established in this matter shall be modified as follows: Comments Due: October 25, 2006 Reply Comments Due: December 11, 2006 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Motion of the National Association of Regulatory Utility Commissioners for Extension of Time is GRANTED, as set forth herein. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-174A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-174A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-174A1.txt
  • to prepare their comments. Accordingly, we find that USTelecom has shown good cause for an extension of time. Comments are due March 27, 2006, and reply comments are due May 26, 2006. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 5(c) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. �� 154(i), 154(j), and 155(c), and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.46 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, and 1.46, the request for extension of time filed by United States Telecom Association, IS GRANTED, to the extent described herein. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Dana R. Shaffer Deputy Chief Wireline Competition Bureau Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service, High-Cost Universal Service Support, CC Docket No. 96-45, WC Docket No. 05-337, Notice
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1880A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1880A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1880A1.txt
  • 15, 2006 as comment and reply comment dates in WT Docket No. 06-169, and (2) November 15, 2006 as a date for filing supplemental comments in WT Docket No. 96-86. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to sections 4(i) and 4(j) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 154(i) and 154(j), and sections 0.131, 0.331, and 1.46 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.131, 0.331, and 1.46, the deadline for filing comments in response to the Notice is extended to September 29, 2006. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to sections 4(i) and 4(j) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 154(i) and 154(j), and sections 0.131, 0.331, and 1.46 of the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2116A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2116A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2116A1.txt
  • issues, and assert that any change to the existing 700 MHz Public Safety band plan will affect their plans for public safety communications. The parties state that they require additional time to more thoroughly analyze the complex issues raised, and request extensions of time ranging from ``no less than 30 days'' to 60 days in which to file comments. Section 1.46(a) of the Commission's rules states that motions for extension of time will not be granted routinely. In addition, Section 1.46(b) of the Commission's rules requires that motions for extensions of time shall be filed seven days before the filing date. In an emergency situation, we may consider a late-filed motion for a brief extension of time related to the duration
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2339A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2339A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2339A1.txt
  • importance of the issues raised in the Missoula Plan to NARUC and its member state commissions, and we agree that the additional time we grant here will help ensure their continued full participation. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 5(c) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. �� 154(i), 154(j), 155(c), and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.46 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.46, the pleading cycle established in this matter shall be modified as follows: Reply Comments Due: January 11, 2007 All other filing procedures remain unchanged from those previously established in this proceeding. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Motion of the National Association of Regulatory Utility Commissioners for Extension of Time
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2482A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2482A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2482A1.txt
  • cause exists to grant a very limited extension of time. Therefore, we extend the reply comment deadline in this proceeding by four days to December 15, 2006. 4. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to Sections 4(i), 4(j) and 5(c) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 154(i), 154(j) and 155(c), and Sections 0.61, 0.283, and 1.46 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.61, 0.283, and 1.46, the date for filing reply comments in CSR-7057-Z is extended to December 15, 2006. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Steven A. Broeckaert Deputy Chief Policy Division, Media Bureau Request for Waiver of 47 C.F.R. � 76.1204(A)(1) Filed with the Commission (rel. Oct. 31, 2006) (Public Notice). Bend Cable Communications, LLC Motion
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2483A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2483A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2483A1.txt
  • 2006 to file comments and until January 29, 2007 to file reply comments. See Wireline Competition Bureau Grants Extension of Time to File Comments on Verizon's Petitions for Forbearance in the Boston, New York, Philadelphia, Pittsburgh, Providence, and Virginia Beach Metropolitan Statistical Areas, WC Docket No. 06-172, Public Notice, DA 06-1869 (WCB rel. Oct. 18, 2006). See 47 C.F.R. � 1.46(a). See Pleading Cycle Established for Comments on Motion to Compel Disclosure of Confidential Information Pursuant to Protective Order and Motion to Dismiss, WC Docket No. 06-172, Public Notice, DA 06-2056 (WCB rel. Oct. 18, 2006); Letter from Brett Heather Freedson, Counsel for CLEC Parties, to Marlene H. Dortch, Secretary, FCC, WC Docket No. 06-172 Attach. (filed Oct. 11, 2006), amended
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2498A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2498A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2498A1.txt
  • in achieving greater compatibility between hearing aids and digital wireless phones; (2) the development of new technologies that could provide greater or more efficient accessibility of wireless telecommunications to hearing aid users; and (3) the impact of the Commission's compatibility requirements on cochlear implant and middle ear implant users and their ability to use digital wireless phones. 47 C.F.R. � 1.46(a). Motion at 4. Id. Id. PUBLIC NOTICE Federal Communications Commission 445 12th St., S.W. Washington, D.C. 20554 News Media Information 202 / 418-0500 Internet: http://www.fcc.gov TTY: 1-888-835-5322 � � � ��PNG r v ��"r�9 I'6� �d�Y�͆aX ���; Wh� �X,�aX���y�]\\.W`h���va6l! �v"]�V�at�������-``````�"m(c)x<��G�<���={-N��J%t�<== �"""x ҍ� � ��(c)���!��'' �R)&� �A�� "���\��v`` � 6� �� � (R) � (R) $ B �
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2548A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2548A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2548A1.txt
  • issue to the industry, we find that good cause exists to provide parties a brief extension of time, from December 22, 2006 to January 5, 2007 for filing reply comments in this proceeding. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 5(c) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. �� 154(i), 154(j), 155(c), and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.46 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.46, the pleading cycle established in this matter shall be modified as follows: Reply Comments Due: January 5, 2007 All other filing procedures remain unchanged from those previously established in this proceeding. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the request of the Supporters of the Missoula Plan for an Extension of Time
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2577A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2577A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2577A1.txt
  • state commissions, and we agree that the additional time we grant here will give parties the time necessary to more accurately estimate the effects of the Missoula Plan and proposed modifications under consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 5(c) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. �� 154(i), 154(j), 155(c), and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.46 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.46, the pleading cycle established in this matter shall be modified as follows: Reply Comments Due: February 1, 2007 All other filing procedures remain unchanged from those previously established in this proceeding. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Motion of the Early Adopter Regulatory Commissions for Extension of Time is GRANTED,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-42A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-42A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-42A1.txt
  • of Time to File Comments (filed Jan. 4, 2006) (Motion). See Pleading Cycle Established for Petition for Rulemaking of Fibertech Networks, LLC, Public Notice, RM-11303, DA 05-3182 (rel. Dec. 14, 2005). Motion at 1. Id. at 2. Fibertech Opposition to Motion for Extension of Time (filed Jan. 9, 2006) (Opposition). Opposition at 2. Id. at 3. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.46(a). (...continued from previous page) (continued....) Federal Communications Commission DA 06-42 Federal Communications Commission DA 06-42 r s p q r � � -s � $ $ F � � � � % @ A C D F h i y z } " � (R) � � � � � � � � � � � � � @ A
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-537A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-537A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-537A1.txt
  • we conclude that a short extension of time is warranted. We therefore extend by two weeks the reply comment deadline in this proceeding to March 28, 2006. 4. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to Sections 4(i), 4(j) and 5(c) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 154(i), 154(j) and 155(c), and Sections 0.61, 0.283, and 1.46 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.61, 0.283, and 1.46, the date for filing reply comments in MB Docket No. 05-311 is extended to March 28, 2006. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Donna C. Gregg Chief, Media Bureau Implementation of Section 621(a)(1) of the Cable Communications Policy Act of 1984 as amended by the Cable Television Consumer Protection and Competition Act
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-638A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-638A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-638A1.txt
  • the Communications Act of 1934, as Amended, WC Docket No. 06-54 (filed Mar. 1, 2006). See Pleading Cycle Established for Comments on Time Warner Cable's Petition for Preemption Regarding the South Carolina Public Service Commission's Denial of a Certificate of Public Convenience and Necessity, WC Docket No. 06-54, DA 06-535, Public Notice (rel. Mar. 6, 2006). See 47 C.F.R. � 1.46(a). PUBLIC NOTICE Federal Communications Commission 445 12th St., S.W. Washington, D.C. 20554 News Media Information 202 / 418-0500 Internet: http://www.fcc.gov TTY: 1-888-835-5322 - / I q � � � � � � ��PNG r v ��"r�9 I'6� �d�Y�͆aX ���; Wh� �X,�aX���y�]\\.W`h���va6l! �v"]�V�at�������-``````�"m(c)x<��G�<���={-N��J%t�<== �"""x ҍ� � ��(c)���!��'' �R)&� �A�� "���\��v`` � 6� �� �7 �
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-639A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-639A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-639A1.txt
  • Wholesale Telecommunications Services to VoIP Providers, WC Docket No. 06-55 (filed Mar. 1, 2006). See Pleading Cycle Established for Comments on Time Warner Cable's Petition for Declaratory Ruling that Competitive Local Exchange Carriers May Obtain Interconnection to Provide Wholesale Telecommunications Services to VoIP Providers, WC Docket No. 06-55, DA 06-534, Public Notice (rel. Mar. 6, 2006). See 47 C.F.R. � 1.46(a). PUBLIC NOTICE Federal Communications Commission 445 12th St., S.W. Washington, D.C. 20554 News Media Information 202 / 418-0500 Internet: http://www.fcc.gov TTY: 1-888-835-5322 " � tm � � � ��PNG r v ��"r�9 I'6� �d�Y�͆aX ���; Wh� �X,�aX���y�]\\.W`h���va6l! �v"]�V�at�������-``````�"m(c)x<��G�<���={-N��J%t�<== �"""x ҍ� � ��(c)���!��'' �R)&� �A�� "���\��v`` � 6� �� �7 �
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-765A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-765A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-765A1.txt
  • the filing of their reply comments. A one-week extension will result in a more complete discussion and analysis of the issues raised in the initial comments. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to Sections 4(i), 4(j), 403, and 628(g) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 154(i), 154(j), 403, and 548(g), and Sections 0.61, 0.283, and 1.46 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 0.61, 0.283, and 1.46, the Motion for Extension of Time, filed by the National Cable & Telecommunications Association, IS GRANTED, and the deadline for filing reply comments in this proceeding IS EXTENDED to April 25, 2006. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION William H. Johnson Deputy Chief, Media Bureau Annual Assessment of the Status of Competition
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-840A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-840A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-840A1.txt
  • Security and Authentication Standards for Access to Customer Proprietary Network Information, Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, CC Docket No. 96-115, FCC 06-10 (rel. Feb. 14, 2006). See Comment and Reply Comment Dates Established for Notice of Proposed Rulemaking in Commission's Customer Proprietary Network Information Proceeding, WC Docket No. 96-115, DA 06-600, Public Notice (rel. Mar. 16, 2006). See 47 C.F.R. � 1.46(a). PUBLIC NOTICE Federal Communications Commission 445 12th St., S.W. Washington, D.C. 20554 News Media Information 202 / 418-0500 Internet: http://www.fcc.gov TTY: 1-888-835-5322 & ' X \ ] a � � � � � � � � � � � � � � ��PNG r v ��"r�9 I'6� �d�Y�͆aX ���; Wh� �X,�aX���y�]\\.W`h���va6l! �v"]�V�at�������-``````�"m(c)x<��G�<���={-N��J%t�<== �"""x ҍ� � ��(c)���!��'' �R)&� �A�� "���\��v`` �
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1318A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1318A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1318A1.txt
  • that the additional time would be beneficial to the development of a complete record on the issues, we find that providing the extension requested in the motions serves the public interest. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to authority found in section 4(i) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. � 154(i), and sections 0.131, 0.331 and 1.46 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.131, 0.331, 1.46, the Joint Motion by CTIA-The Wireless Association and Skype Communications S.A.R.L. for Extension of Time IS GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Motion by the Telecommunications Industry Association for Extension of Time IS GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that comments in this proceeding shall be due by April 30,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1366A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1366A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1366A1.txt
  • extension of time from April 2, 2007 to May 2, 2007 for filing comments in this proceeding and from April 17, 2007 to May 23, 2007 for filing reply comments in this proceeding. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to section 4(i), 4(j), and 5(c) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. �� 154(i), 154(j), 155(c), and section 0.91, 0.291, and 1.46 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.46, the pleading cycle established in this matter shall be modified as follows: Comments Due: May 2, 2007 Reply Comments Due: May 23, 2007 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Joint Motion to Extend Time to File Public Comments is GRANTED, as set forth herein. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Thomas J. Navin
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1693A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1693A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1693A1.txt
  • in this proceeding. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED that the request of the Communications Workers of America and International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers for an Extension of Time is GRANTED, as set forth herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 5(c) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. �� 154(i), 154(j), 155(c), and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.46 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.46, the pleading cycle established in this matter shall be modified as follows: Comments/Petitions to Deny Due: April 27, 2007 Responses/Oppositions Due: May 7, 2007 Replies Due: May 14, 2007 FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Marcus Maher Acting Associate Chief, Wireline Competition Bureau See Applications filed for the Transfer of Certain Spectrum Licenses
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-203A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-203A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-203A1.txt
  • Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 154(i), 309, and Section 1.939 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.939, that the Petition to Deny filed by WHTV Broadcasting Corporation on September 2, 2005 IS DISMISSED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that pursuant to Section 4(i) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. � 154(i), and Section 1.46 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.46, that the Request for Extension of Time filed by Rohel Pascual on September 16, 2005 IS GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to Sections 4(i) and 309 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 154(i), 309, and Section 1.949 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.949, that
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2096A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2096A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2096A1.txt
  • that are raised, however, we find that good cause exists to provide all parties an extension of time from May 23, 2007 to June 13, 2007 for filing reply comments in this proceeding. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to section 4(i), 4(j), and 5(c) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. �� 154(i), 154(j), 155(c), and section 0.91, 0.291, and 1.46 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.46, the pleading cycle established in this matter shall be modified as follows: Reply Comments Due: June 13, 2007 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Motion for Extension of Time is GRANTED, as set forth herein. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Thomas J. Navin Chief, Wireline Competition Bureau Implementation of the Pay Telephone
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2190A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2190A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2190A1.txt
  • Alenco Petition is extended from May 25, 2007 to June 22, 2007, and the deadline for filing reply comments is extended from June 11, 2007 to July 9, 2007. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 5(c) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 154(i), 154(j), 155(c), and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.46 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.46, the pleading cycle established in this matter shall be modified as follows: Comments Due: June 22, 2007 Reply Comments Due: July 9, 2007 FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Ren�e R. Crittendon Deputy Chief Wireline Competition Bureau Petition of Alenco Communications, Inc., Big Bend Telephone Company, Dell Telephone Cooperative, Inc., Riviera Telephone Company,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2232A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2232A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2232A1.txt
  • other major Commission proceedings, and that many participants in those proceedings are likely commenters in this proceeding. MAP requests an extension in order to facilitate the development of a fuller record in Docket 93-8. The current deadline for filing comments is June 18, 2007, and the deadline for filing reply comments is July 3, 2007. As set forth in Section 1.46 of the Commission's rules, the extension of time for filing comments in rulemaking proceedings shall not be routinely granted. However, in view of these circumstances, we believe that a 30 day extension for the comment and reply period is warranted to facilitate the development of a complete record. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that the Request for Extension of Time filed
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2287A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2287A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2287A1.txt
  • quarter of children's programming. According to CMPC, extending the comment and reply comment due dates by two months would give CMPC and others the opportunity to analyze the most recent data and, in addition, would provide the time needed for CMPC to engage researchers to help analyze the quantity and quality of children's educational programming. As set forth in Section 1.46 of the Commission's rules, it is our policy that extensions of time for filing comments in rulemaking proceedings shall not be routinely granted. However, in view of the circumstances outlined by CMPC, we believe that an extension of the comment and reply comment periods in this proceeding is warranted to facilitate the development of a complete record. This extension will
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2425A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2425A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2425A1.txt
  • On balance, we conclude that a ten-day extension will best serve the public interest by allowing the parties to commence discussions and prepare thorough reply comments while ensuring that the proceeding is expeditiously resolved. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to authority found in section 4(i) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. � 154(i), and Section 1.46 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.46, that the Motion for Extension of Time filed by Mobile Satellite Ventures Subsidiary LLC on June 6, 2007 IS GRANTED IN PART, and the time for filing reply comments in this proceeding IS EXTENDED TO June 21, 2007. This actions is taken under delegated authority pursuant to Sections 0.131 and 0.331 of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2509A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2509A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2509A1.txt
  • alternative to the approach the Petitioners previously proposed in an earlier petition for rulemaking. On March 2, 2007, the Commission established a pleading cycle for comments on the Alternative Proposal. Comments were filed in this proceeding on May 2, 2007 and reply comments are due June 13, 2007. On June 11, 2007, Petitioners filed a Petition for Waiver of section 1.46(b) to waive the requirement that extensions of time be filed at least seven days before the filing date and an additional Motion for Extension of Time to file reply comments until June 20, 2007. In support of its filings, the Petitioners explain that the preparation of reply comments and supporting materials is taking longer than anticipated, partly due to the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2565A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2565A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2565A1.txt
  • in this proceeding is appropriate under the circumstances. The deadline for filing reply comments in response to the Notice is extended from June 13, 2007 to June 21, 2007. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 5(c) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 154(i), 154(j), 155(c), and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.46 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.46, the pleading cycle established in this matter shall be modified as follows: Reply Comments Due: June 21, 2007 FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Ren�e R. Crittendon Deputy Chief Wireline Competition Bureau Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service, WC Docket No. 05-337, CC Docket No. 96-45, Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, FCC 07-88 (rel.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2584A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2584A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2584A1.txt
  • that the Commission would benefit by a more complete record in the comments to the pending NPRM, if parties are able to evaluate the text of the Inside Wiring Order. According to RAA, extending the comment and reply comment due dates by two weeks would give RAA and others the opportunity to analyze the Order. As set forth in Section 1.46 of the Commission's rules, it is the Commission's policy that extensions of time for filing comments in rulemaking proceedings shall not be routinely granted. However, in view of the circumstances outlined by RAA as well as the short duration of the requested extension, we believe that a short extension of the comment and reply comment periods in this proceeding is
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-25A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-25A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-25A1.txt
  • Satellite Service in the United States ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) IB Docket No. 06-160 Report No. SPB-196 ORDER EXTENDING REPLY COMMENT PERIOD Adopted: January 8, 2007 Released: January 8, 2007 REPLY COMMENT DATE: January 25, 2007 By the Chief, Satellite Division, International Bureau: On December 22, 2006, SES Americom, Inc. (SES Americom), pursuant to Section 1.46 of the Commission's rules, filed a ``Motion for Extension of Time'' requesting that the Commission extend the reply comment filing deadline in this proceeding from January 11, 2007 to January 25, 2007. SES Americom states that a two-week extension will enable the parties to provide a more complete record for review in this proceeding, which raises important policy and technical
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-277A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-277A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-277A1.txt
  • deadlines a second time until February 2, 2007 and March 19, 2007, respectively. See Wireline Competition Bureau Grants Extension of Time to File Comments on Verizon's Petitions for Forbearance in the Boston, New York, Philadelphia, Pittsburgh, Providence, and Virginia Beach Metropolitan Statistical Areas, WC Docket No. 06-172, Public Notice, DA 06-2483 (WCB rel. Dec. 8, 2006). See 47 C.F.R. � 1.46(a). See Petitions of the Verizon Telephone Companies for Forbearance Pursuant to 47 U.S.C. � 160(c) in the Boston, New York, Philadelphia, Pittsburgh, Providence, and Virginia Beach Metropolitan Statistical Areas, WC Docket No. 06-172, Order, DA 07-208 (WCB rel. Jan. 25, 2007) (Second Protective Order). PUBLIC NOTICE Federal Communications Commission 445 12th Street, S.W. Washington, D.C. 20554 DA 07-277 News Media
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3009A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3009A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3009A1.txt
  • For Review (Motion). The Motion relates to an Application for Review (Application), filed by Wireless Network Properties, LLC (WNP) on June 21, 2007, which seeks review of an Order, released by the Spectrum and Competition Policy Division (Division) of the Wireless Telecommunications Bureau, denying WNP's Petition for Declaratory Ruling regarding a proposed tower in Chattanooga, Tennessee. NPS, pursuant to Section 1.46 of the Commission's Rules, requests an extension of time until July 20, 2007, to file its Opposition to WNP's Application for Review. In its Motion, NPS indicates that it has a direct interest in the controversy because the proposed tower is near the Chickamauga and Chattanooga National Military Park. Counsel for NPS requests additional time due to extraordinary time constraints
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3042A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3042A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3042A1.txt
  • Brett Heather Freedson, Counsel to Covad Communications Group et al., to Marlene H. Dortch, Secretary, FCC, WC Docket No. 07-97 (filed July 5, 2007); Letter from Thomas Jones, Attorneys for Time Warner Telecom Inc. et al., to Marlene H. Dortch, Secretary, FCC, WC Docket No. 07-97 (filed July 5, 2007). Arizona Commission Request at 2. Id. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.46(a). PUBLIC NOTICE Federal Communications Commission 445 12th Street, S.W. Washington, D.C. 20554 News Media Information 202 / 418-0500 Fax-On-Demand 202 / 418-2830 TTY 202 / 418-2555 Internet: http://www.fcc.gov ftp.fcc.gov h h hk$ hk$ hk$ hk$ gd $ h h� A B � hk$ $ $ % �����PNG > �!�R>^��S�S߿�"K�k������er4 �J�dM�O�O � �,I TV��5 0�z̪�� ��� %�o� �� � �a�% Tf(c)
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3047A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3047A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3047A1.txt
  • issues in contention. In the instant proceeding, we note that it is beneficial to all interested parties and the public for Clarity to explore alternate methods for delivering its proposed service. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to authority found in section 4(i) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. � 154(i), and sections 0.61, 0.283 and 1.46 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.61, 0.283 & 1.46, Clarity's Motion for Extension of Time IS GRANTED to establish a new reply deadline of August 20, 2007. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Roy J. Stewart Senior Deputy Bureau Chief Media Bureau Waiver Requests by Clarity Media Systems, LLC To Operate CARS Stations at Flying J Travel Plazas. DA 07-1946. Rel.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3096A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3096A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3096A1.txt
  • July 31, 2007. We find that providing a limited extension would serve the public interest by allowing RC to fully consider the arguments raised in the oppositions and prepare a concise but thorough reply. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to authority found in section 4(i) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. � 154(i), and Section 1.46 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.46, that the Motion for Extension of Time to Reply to Oppositions on July 5, 2007 IS GRANTED, and the time for filing reply comments in this proceeding IS EXTENDED TO July 31, 2007. This action is taken under delegated authority pursuant to Sections 0.131 and 0.331 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3259A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3259A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3259A1.txt
  • Petition for Declaratory Ruling ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) WC Docket No. 07-73 DA 07-2257 FCC File Nos.: ITC T/C-20070405-00136 ITC T/C-20070405-00133 ITC T/C-20070405-00135 SES-T/C-20070404-00440 through 00443 0002961737 ISP-PDR-20070405-00006 ORDER Adopted: July 16, 2007 Released: July 16, 2007 By the Chief, Policy Division, International Bureau: We have before us two requests under Section 1.46(b) of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.46(b) (2006), for extension of the time for replying to the Oppositions in the above-captioned matter: one filed on July 11, 2007, jointly by Iridium Satellite, LLC (Iridium), and VIZADA Services LLC (VIZADA); and a second filed on July 12, 2007, by Telenor Satellite Services, Inc. (Telenor). Specifically, both requests seek an extension
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3470A4.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3470A4.txt
  • 0.00 3.91 TargetingLatinoAudiences OnNetworksTargetingLatinoAudiences 8.13 15.17 7.05 Spanish-LanguageProgramming 3.39 5.54 3.05 NetworksTargetingOtherDiverseAudiences 2.65 0.00 3.06 Children'sProgramming "Children'sProgramming" 1.93 0.84 2.10 GMoviesorTV-Y/TV-Y7TV 3.11 1.06 3.42 Eitheroftheabove 5.03 1.90 5.52 FamilyProgramming NetworksTargetingFamilies 10.93 0.00 12.61 TY-GProgramming 11.59 17.05 10.75 Arts,Educational,orDocumentaryProgramming 7.60 6.46 7.77 Eitherofthetwoabove 19.18 23.50 18.52 AdultProgramming NetworksShowingAdultProgramming 4.98 0.00 5.75 NC-17MoviesorTV-MA-S/TV-MA-LTV 0.67 0.39 0.72 ViolentProgramming "ViolentProgramming" 1.70 0.53 1.88 TV-PG-VTelevision 1.46 2.31 1.33 TV-14-VTelevision 1.47 2.07 1.37 TV-MA-VTelevision 0.19 0.12 0.20 Anyofthethreeabove 3.11 4.50 2.90 Anyofthelasttwoabove 1.65 2.18 1.57 ReligiousProgramming NetworksShowingPrimarilyReligiousProgramming 1.52 7.58 0.58 "ReligiousProgramming" 3.03 11.76 1.69 OverallTargeting AverageTVContentRating(wherenotedforTV) 3.81 3.66 3.86 AverageMPAARating(wherenotedformovies) 3.96 4.00 3.95 Observations 265,388 35,448 229,940 Notes:Reportedinthetableisthepercentageofquarter-hoursofprogrammingononeof27broadcast televisionnetworks(cf.Table5)or192cabletelevisionnetworks(cf.Table27-28)between6:00p.m.and 12:00a.m.EST(ortheequivalent)duringeachofthetwoweeksperyearfor4years(cf.Table1)devoted toprogrammingofthelistedtypes.SeeSection4.2forfurtherdetailaboutthedefinitionofprogramtypes. Source:Authorcalculations. 35 Table7: ProgramAvailabilitybyProgramType 6:00p.m.-12:00a.m.EST(orequivalent),2weeks/year,2003-2006 AllBroadcast Cable Variable Networks NetworksNetworks NewsProgramming AnyNews 48.00 66.38 36.74 NetworkNews
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3470A6.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3470A6.txt
  • (1.39) -0.1049 (-0.54) 0.006 (0.22) -0.000007 (-1.37) 0.132 104 Format 20 Count 6.131 (0.83) 0.086* (2.30) 12.1382 (0.74) -0.831 (-0.36) 0.000475 (1.16) 0.452 104 Format 20 HHI -0.245* (2.36) -0.001 (1.54) -0.1909 (-0.82) 0.033 (1.03) -0.000008 (-1.37) 0.204 104 Format 11 Count -0.003 (0.00) 0.025 (1.42) -4.0104 (-0.51) -1.296 (-1.19) 0.000246 (1.27) 0.294 104 Format 11 HHI -0.221* (2.13) -0.001 (1.46) -0.4641* (-2.00) 0.014 (0.44) -0.000008 (-1.46) 0.056 104 HHI Stations Percent of Stations with Cross-Owned Newspaper Percent of Stations with Cross-Owned TV Station Number of Commercial Stations Owned Nationally by In-Market Owners Marg. Effect T-Stat Marg. Effect T-Stat Marg. Effect T-Stat Marg. Effect T-Stat Marg. Effect T-Stat Adj R-Squared N Format 101 Count -3.743 (1.70) 0.454* (11.64) 0.7515 (0.13) 1.269
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3484A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3484A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3484A1.txt
  • this proceeding is appropriate under the circumstances. The deadline for filing reply comments in response to the Public Notice is extended from August 13, 2007 to August 31, 2007. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 5(c) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 154(i), 154(j), 155(c), and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.46 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.46, the pleading cycle established in this matter shall be modified as follows: Reply Comments Due: August 31, 2007 FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Jeremy D. Marcus Chief Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Comment Sought on Centennial Communications Corp.'s Request for Review of a Decision by the Universal Service Administrative Company
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3516A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3516A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3516A1.txt
  • the deadline for filing oppositions to the application for review to September 14, 2007, and the deadline for filing replies to those oppositions to October 9, 2007. 4. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to Sections 4(i), 4(j) and 5(c) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 154(i), 154(j) and 155(c), and Sections 0.61, 0.283, and 1.46 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.61, 0.283, and 1.46, the date for filing oppositions to the application for review in CSR-7056-Z, which pertains to NCTA's request for waiver of Section 76.1204(a)(1) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 76.1204(a)(1), is extended to September 14, 2007, and the date for filing replies to oppositions to the application for review
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3518A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3518A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3518A1.txt
  • an extension is necessary to fully review the technical details raised in the Third DTV Periodic NPRM and develop comprehensive comments. The Request also points out that the Seventh Report and Order adopting the new DTV Table of Allotments is expected to be released soon and would inform comments to the Third DTV Periodic NPRM. As set forth in Section 1.46 of the Commission's Rules, it is our policy that extensions of time for filing comments in rulemaking proceedings shall not be routinely granted. However, we believe that a seven day extension for the comment and reply period is warranted to facilitate informed comments to the Third DTV Periodic NPRM, while at the same time maintaining the timing necessary to complete
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3736A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3736A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3736A1.txt
  • NAMAC, et al., request that the Bureau extend the deadline for comments to September 11, 2007 and for reply comments to October 12, 2007. NAMAC, et al., assert that this delay will cause no hardship to other interested parties nor disrupt the orderly business of the Bureau nor substantially delay the outcome of this proceeding. As set forth in Section 1.46 of the Commission's Rules, it is our policy that extensions of time for filing comments in rulemaking proceedings shall not be routinely granted. However, we believe that in this case an extension of the comment and reply period is warranted to facilitate informed comments and the opportunity for analysis in the reply comments. In the Notice, we asked the commenting
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-38A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-38A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-38A1.txt
  • 2007, and reply comments were initially due on February 12, 2007. On December 29, 2006, the Association of Federal Communications Consulting Engineers (AFCCE) filed a request for a 30 day extension of time to file comments in this proceeding. AFCCE argues that additional time is needed to complete the engineering analysis necessary to prepare comments. As set forth in Section 1.46 of the Commission's rules, it is our policy that extensions of time for filing comments in rulemaking proceedings shall not be routinely granted. Moreover, the initial comment period in the proceeding was longer than usual. However, in view of the circumstances outlined by AFCCE, we believe a 14 day extension for the comment and reply period is warranted to facilitate
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-402A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-402A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-402A1.txt
  • 18 0.17 0.16 2.12 2.28 Feb. 2006 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 TABLE 3 - WJXT VIEWING IN GAINESVILLE Survey Households Share Standard Net Standard Year Studied Viewing Error Weekly Error Hours Circulation Nov. 2004 12 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Feb. 2005 13 0.92 0.76 13.60 12.49 Nov. 2005 18 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Feb. 2006 24 0.26 0.26 1.39 1.46 As a result, WGFL requests that the Commission grant its petition so that it can assert its exclusivity rights in Gainesville, Florida. We find that WGFL made the requisite showing to support its petition. As required by the rules, WGFL has provided community-specific survey results for each station for each year surveyed. WESH and WTLV are network affiliates and, therefore,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4107A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4107A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4107A1.txt
  • time to review DCS's Initial Comments. DCS states that these potential commenters may have difficulty in meeting the current deadline. DCS also claims that it needs additional time to address comments related to its proposals. On October 9, the National Association of Broadcasters also filed a Motion for Extension of Time, supporting DCS's extension Motion. As set forth in Section 1.46(a) of the Commission's rules, it is our policy that extensions of time are not routinely granted. The Commission has granted extensions of time upon a showing of exceptional circumstances or good cause. We do not believe that a sufficient showing has been made in this instance. In deciding whether to grant an extension of time to file comments, we must
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4329A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4329A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4329A1.txt
  • WUTC and other state commissions, and we agree that the public interest would be served by allowing additional time for parties to prepare and provide detailed comments regarding the merits of Qwest's petition. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 5(c) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. �� 154(i), 154(j), 155(c), and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.46 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.46, the pleading cycle established in this matter shall be modified as follows: Comments Due: December 6, 2007 Reply Comments Due: December 21, 2007 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Request of the Washington Utilities and Transportation Commission for Extension of Time is GRANTED, as set forth herein. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4688A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4688A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4688A1.txt
  • to the issues raised in the Notice. Viacom requests an extension of the comment deadline to ensure a coordinated and comprehensive response to this lawsuit and to the Notice. The parties further assert that a 45-day extension of the comment deadline will cause no hardship or prejudice to other interested parties or to the Commission. As set forth in Section 1.46 of the Commission's Rules, the Commission's policy is that extensions of time for filing comments in rulemaking proceedings shall not be routinely granted. In this case, however, an extension of the comment and reply comment period is warranted to enable commenters to gather sufficient data, including economic analyses, to facilitate the development of a thorough record in response to the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4691A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4691A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4691A1.txt
  • consideration of the questions raised in the Embarq Petition, we find that good cause exists to provide parties the requested brief extension of time for filing comments and reply comments in this proceeding. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 5(c) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. �� 154(i), 154(j), 155(c), and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.46 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.46, the pleading cycle established in this matter shall be modified as follows: Comments Due: December 14, 2007 Reply Comments Due: January 10, 2008 All other filing procedures remain unchanged from those previously established in this proceeding. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the request of COMPTEL for an Extension of Time
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4977A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4977A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4977A1.txt
  • MHz bidding strategies.'' M2Z also noted that ``parties are free to file ex parte comments at the conclusion of the 700 MHz auction, to the extent anything that occurs there may be relevant.'' In addition, M2Z asserts that MetroPCS's proposed extension could cause the Commission to be unable to meet its stated nine-month deadline for adopting service rules. Under Section 1.46(a) of the Commission's rules, it is the policy of the Commission that extensions of time shall not be routinely granted, and we find that the circumstances presented do not warrant extending the comment deadline for certain issues. We do not believe that it is necessary to wait until the outcome of Auction No. 73 has been determined to collect a
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-5082A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-5082A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-5082A1.txt
  • the intervening holidays, however, we find that good cause exists to provide all parties an extension of time from December 31, 2007 to January 16, 2008 for filing reply comments in this proceeding. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to section 4(i), 4(j), and 5(c) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. �� 154(i), 154(j), 155(c), and section 0.91, 0.291, and 1.46 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.46, reply comments in this matter shall be filed on or before January 16, 2008. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the motions of FUTUREPHONE.COM, LLC., the National Telephone Cooperative Association and the Independent Telephone and Telecommunications Alliance, and CTIA - the Wireless Association for Extension of Time ARE GRANTED, as set
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-636A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-636A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-636A1.txt
  • prepare responsive comments, however, we find that good cause exists to provide all parties an extension of time, from February 12, 2007 to February 19, 2007 for filing reply comments in this proceeding. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 5(c) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. �� 154(i), 154(j), 155(c), and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.46 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.46, the pleading cycle established in this matter shall be modified as follows: Reply Comments Due: February 19, 2007 All other filing procedures remain unchanged from those previously established in this proceeding. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Motion of the Payphone Association of Ohio for Extension of Time is GRANTED,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-72A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-72A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-72A1.txt
  • in agreement that the additional time would be beneficial to conduct discussions related to avian tower safety, we find that providing the extension requested in this Motion serves the public interest. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to authority found in section 4(i) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. � 154(i), and sections 0.131, 0.331 and 1.46 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.131, 0.331, 1.46, the Motion for Extension of Time IS GRANTED to establish a new comments deadline of April 23, 2007, and a new reply comments deadline of May 23, 2007. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Fred B. Campbell, Jr. Chief Wireless Telecommunications Bureau In the Matter of Effects of Communications Towers on Migratory Birds,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-73A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-73A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-73A1.txt
  • reply comments, which should be informed by this reminder as to the scope of the matter presented here. Specifically, we extend the deadline for filing reply comments until January 31, 2007. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 5(c) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. �� 154(i), 154(j), 155(c), and sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.1, 1.2 and 1.46 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.1, 1.2, 1.46, the pleading cycle established in this matter shall be modified as follows: Reply Comments Due: January 31, 2007 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Motion for Extension of Time of One Stop Financial, Inc., Group Discounts, Inc., 800 Discounts, Inc. and Winback & Conserve Program, Inc. is GRANTED
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-113A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-113A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-113A1.txt
  • contend that the eighteen-day period between the comment and reply comment deadlines does not provide sufficient time for parties to respond effectively. The parties submit that additional time to prepare reply comments will cause no hardship or prejudice to other interested parties or to the Commission and will facilitate the development of a meaningful record. As set forth in Section 1.46 of the Commission's Rules, the Commission's policy is that extensions of time for filing comments in rulemaking proceedings shall not be routinely granted. In this case, however, an extension of the reply comment period is warranted to enable commenters to adequately review and respond to the extensive comments filed in response to the Notice. We decline, however, to grant the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1168A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1168A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1168A1.txt
  • time for commenters to complete their reply comments. The deadline for filing reply comments in response to the Notices is extended from May 19, 2008 to June 2, 2008. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 5(c) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 154(i), 154(j), 155(c), and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.46 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.46, the pleading cycle established in this matter shall be modified as follows: Reply Comments Due: June 2, 2008 FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Jeremy D. Marcus Acting Associate Chief Wireline Competition Bureau High-Cost Universal Service Support, Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service, WC Docket No. 05-337, CC Docket No. 96-45, Notice of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-132A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-132A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-132A1.txt
  • this proceeding is appropriate under the circumstances. The deadline for filing reply comments in response to the Public Notice is extended from January 18, 2008, to February 1, 2008. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 5(c) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 154(i), 154(j), 155(c), and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.46 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.46, the pleading cycle established in this matter shall be modified as follows: Reply Comments Due: February 1, 2008. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Jeremy D. Marcus Acting Associate Chief Wireline Competition Bureau Comment Sought on the Petition of Osirus Communications, Inc. to Waive Certain Sections of the Commission's Rules in Order to
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1359A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1359A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1359A1.txt
  • Benton Foundation; Common Cause; Community Broadcasters Association; Council Tree Communications, Inc.; Destiny Communications LLC; Dover Capital Partners, LLC; First Broadcasting Investment Partners, LLC; Gannett Co., Inc.; Granite Broadcasting Corporation; Independent Spanish Broadcasters Association; Media Alliance; Mullaney Engineering; National Association of Broadcasters; National Organization for Women; News Corporation; Spanish Broadcasting System, Inc.; and ZGS Communications. Id. at 2. 47 C.F.R. � 1.46. (continued....) Federal Communications Commission DA 08-1359 Federal Communications Commission DA 08-1359 � � � � k k 0 Z ] m `` �
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1464A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1464A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1464A1.txt
  • Notice established a comment deadline of June 25, 2008 and a reply comment deadline of July 7, 2008. On June 17, 2008, the National Association of Theater Owners, Inc. (``NATO'') requested that the deadlines be extended by 25 days due to the complexity of the issues presented in MPAA's waiver request. We grant NATO's request. As set forth in Section 1.46(a) of the Commission's Rules, the Commission's policy is that extensions of time shall not be routinely granted. Given the importance of the issues in this proceeding and in the interest of encouraging public dialogue regarding these issues, however, we believe that grant of NATO's request is necessary to facilitate the development of a full record. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1523A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1523A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1523A1.txt
  • that providing a limited extension will serve the public interest by allowing parties to discuss the complex issues at stake, develop consensus approaches where possible, and prepare thorough comments while ensuring that the proceeding is expeditiously resolved. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to Section 4(i) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. � 154(i), and Section 1.46 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.46, that the Motion for Extension of Time filed by National EBS Association and the Catholic Television Network on June 13, 2008 IS GRANTED, and the time for filing comments in this proceeding IS EXTENDED TO September 22, 2008, and the time for filing reply comments in this proceeding is EXTENDED TO October
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1604A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1604A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1604A1.txt
  • we do not believe that grant of the Motion will prejudice any interested party. Therefore, we extend the period during which any interested person may file a reply to statements in support of or in opposition to the Petition in accordance with Section 1.405(b) of the Commission's Rules to August 11, 2008. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that pursuant to Section 1.46 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.46, the Motion of UTC/Winchester to extend the period for filing replies to statements in support or in opposition to the above captioned Petition to August 11, 2008 is GRANTED. This action is taken under delegated authority pursuant to Sections 0.31, 0.204 and 0.241 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. ��0.31, 0.204, 0.241.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1614A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1614A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1614A1.txt
  • allow small and rural companies adequate opportunity to assess the impact of the Commission's proposal on the deployment of broadband wireless services in rural areas. M2Z Networks, Inc. (M2Z) filed an opposition to T-Mobile's request for an extension of the comment period, asserting that the Commission already has an extensive record on interference issues in the above-captioned proceeding. Under Section 1.46(a) of the Commission's rules, it is the policy of the Commission that extensions of time shall not be routinely granted. Nevertheless, in this instance, we find that providing additional time for filing comments will serve the public interest by ensuring the development of a more complete and well-developed record in response to the FNPRM. We note that parties have had
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1650A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1650A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1650A1.txt
  • Network v. Time Warner Cable, Inc., Motion for Extension of Time to File Opposition, filed by David C. Frederick, Kellogg, Huber, Hansen, Todd & Evans, P.L.L.C, Counsel for MASN, July 11, 2008. Id. Id. See 47 C.F.R. �� 1.45 (providing that ``[o]ppositions to any motion, petition or request may be filed within 10 days after the original pleading is filed''); 1.46 (governing motions for extension of time). 47 C.F.R. � 0.283. (...continued from previous page) (continued....) Federal Communications Commission DA 08-1650 Federal Communications Commission DA 08-1650 2 3 � F
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1681A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1681A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1681A1.txt
  • Procedures for Auction 85,'' Public Notice, DA 08-460 (rel. July 17, 2008) (Auction 85 Comment Public Notice). 47 C.F.R. �� 1.2105(c), 73.5002(d). See National Translator Association's Request for Extension of Settlement Period filed July 25, 2008 (NTA Request). NTA Request at 1. Id. It is the Commission's policy that requests for extension are not routinely granted. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.46. ``LPTV and TV Translator Digital Companion Channels Mutually Exclusive Proposals; Announcement of 60-Day Settlement Period Ending December 15, 2006,'' Public Notice, Report No. AUC-06-85-C (Auction No. 85), 21 FCC Rcd 11720 (WTB/MB 2006). See also ``LPTV and TV Translator Digital Companion Channel Applications Non-Mutually Exclusive Proposals (Auction No. 85),'' Public Notice, DA 06-1748, 21 FCC Rcd 9830 (MB Video Div.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1869A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1869A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1869A1.txt
  • comments and reply comments in response to the Public Notice is extended from July 31, 2008 and August 15, 2008 to August 21, 2008 and September 5, 2008, respectively. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 5(c) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 154(i), 154(j), 155(c), and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.46 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.46, the pleading cycle established in this matter shall be modified as follows: Comments Due: August 21, 2008 Reply Comments Due: September 5, 2008 FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Marcus Maher Associate Chief Wireline Competition Bureau Comment Sought on a Petition Filed By Virgin Mobile USA, L.P. for Limited Designation as an Eligible
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1879A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1879A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1879A1.txt
  • oppositions from August 13, 2008 to September 5, 2008. We find that providing a limited extension will serve the public interest by allowing parties to discuss the complex issues at stake and develop consensus approaches where possible. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to Section 4(i) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. � 154(i), and Section 1.46 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.46, that the Motion for Extension of Time filed by the Wireless Communications Association International, Inc. on August 6, 2008 IS GRANTED, and the time for filing replies to opposition in this proceeding IS EXTENDED TO September 5, 2008. This actions is taken under delegated authority pursuant to Sections 0.131 and 0.331 of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1904A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1904A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1904A1.txt
  • (filed Aug. 8, 2008) (the Associations' Motion). Petition of AT&T Inc. for Interim Declaratory Ruling and Limited Waivers Regarding Access Charges and the ESP Exemption, Motion for Extension of Time, WC Docket No. 08-152 (filed Aug. 8, 2008) (NARUC Motion). See COMPTEL Motion at 2; NARUC Motion at 3. NARUC Motion at 3. COMPTEL Motion at 2. 47 C.F.R. � 1.46(a). PUBLIC NOTICE Federal Communications Commission 445 12th Street, S.W. Washington, D.C. 20554 News Media Information 202 / 418-0500 Fax-On-Demand 202 / 418-2830 TTY 202 / 418-2555 Internet: http://www.fcc.gov ftp.fcc.gov � � $ $ �����PNG > �!�R>^��S�S߿�"K�k������er4 �J�dM�O�O � �,I TV��5 0�z̪�� ��� %�o� �� � �a�% Tf(c) U~��Uy�Ӛ�o=�c� {�YAD ���Zv�}�YAD e/�,�-�%E9 ^1�J 2�� bʆPh=f 8H�]}��`��2@ ���'����X�t�p�O � ��$��>��� -�m�``�Q(q P�
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2070A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2070A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2070A1.txt
  • (ACI-NA Motion). See Montgomery County Motion at 1; Associations Motion at 1-2. ACI-NA notes that its annual conference presents a similar conflict. See ACI-NA Motion at 3-4. Associations Motion at 1. Id. at 2-3. 47 U.S.C. �� 332, 253. Montgomery County Motion at 2. Florida Cities Motion at 1-2. ACI-NA Motion at 4. CTIA Opposition at 2. 47 C.F.R. � 1.46(a). PUBLIC NOTICE Federal Communications Commission 445 12th Street, S.W. Washington, D.C. 20554 News Media Information 202 / 418-0500 Fax-On-Demand 202 / 418-2830 TTY 202 / 418-2555 Internet: http://www.fcc.gov ftp.fcc.gov $ % ; $ � $ �����PNG > �!�R>^��S�S߿�"K�k������er4 �J�dM�O�O � �,I TV��5 0�z̪�� ��� %�o� �� � �a�% Tf(c) U~��Uy�Ӛ�o=�c� {�YAD ���Zv�}�YAD e/�,�-�%E9 ^1�J 2�� bʆPh=f 8H�]}��`��2@ ���'����X�t�p�O � ��$��>���
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2223A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2223A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2223A1.txt
  • decision made prior to the resolution of the court challenges may need to be substantially revised if the court modifies or overturns the cross-ownership rule or any of the factors adopted in the Quadrennial Review Order. By granting the requested extension of time, the Media Parties state, the Commission will simply preserve the status quo. Pursuant to 47 C.F.R. � 1.46 and for good cause shown, we will extend the filing deadline until November 7, 2008 for the Media Parties to file amendments or revised waiver requests. We find that there is good cause to grant a 30-day extension of time in order to provide a reasonable opportunity for the Commission to consider the accompanying extension request. This Order does not
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2258A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2258A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2258A1.txt
  • is ``appropriate given the compelling public interest in achieving accurate and reliable E911 location information.'' Accordingly, the Bureau cannot countenance the delay that would attend any extension of the reply comment filing deadline. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 5(c) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. �� 154(i), 154(j), 155(c), and sections 0.191, 0.392, and 1.46 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.191, 0.392, 1.46, the Motion for Extension of Time filed by the Rural Cellular Association and T-Mobile USA, Inc. IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Derek K. Poarch Chief, Public Safety and Homeland Security Bureau Comment Sought on Proposals Regarding Service Rules for Wireless Enhanced 911 Phase II Location Accuracy and Reliability, PS Docket
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2311A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2311A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2311A1.txt
  • the volume of the comments and the detail and complexity of the arguments contained therein. On October 15, 2008, Commercial Alert requested that the reply comment deadline be extended by 30 days due to the extent of the comments and the complex constitutional arguments contained therein. We grant the requests of WGAW and Commercial Alert. As set forth in Section 1.46(a) of the Commission's Rules, the Commission's policy is that extensions of time shall not be routinely granted. Given the breadth and importance of the issues in this proceeding, however, we grant an extension of time to facilitate the development of a full record. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to Sections 4(i), 4(j), and 303(r) of the Communications Act of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2462A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2462A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2462A1.txt
  • until 90 days after the issuance of a final court order on pending judicial challenges to the Commission's modified newspaper/broadcast cross-ownership rule. As a result, the new deadline for these filings is December 8, 2008. The Bureau previously extended the initial filing deadline of October 7, 2008 to November 7, 2008 for the same purpose. Pursuant to 47 C.F.R. � 1.46, the Bureau hereby extends the filing deadline for the same reasons cited in its October 7, 2008 Order. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, that pursuant to delegated authority under Sections 4(i) and 303(r) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, and Sections 0.204, 0.283, and 1.46, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.204, 0.283, 1.46, a 30-day extension of time is granted, sua
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2576A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2576A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2576A1.txt
  • parties to discuss the complex issues at stake and develop consensus approaches where possible. Accordingly, we are granting the Request by extending the deadline for all comments and reply comments to February 2, and February 20, 2009, respectively. IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to section 4(i) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. � 154(i), and section 1.46 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.46, the Rural Cellular Association and CTIA - The Wireless Association Joint Request for Extension of Comment and Reply Comment Deadlines, filed on November 20, 2008, is GRANTED, and the deadline for filing comments in response to the Public Notice is EXTENDED to February 2, 2009, and until February 20, 2009, to file
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2614A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2614A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2614A1.txt
  • not address Havens' arguments regarding the sufficiency of such equipment development efforts. We also reject Havens' request for additional time to comment on Attachment A (a single-page document). Havens untimely filed his request for additional time after comments were due on the Attachment, and he failed to serve the request on the parties to this proceeding as required by Section 1.46. In any event, as noted above, our decision in this proceeding does not flow from any assertion in Attachment A, but rather from the evidence-already in the record-that no M-LMS equipment is available at this time. Similarly, we do not find Progeny's opposition to the Havens request decisionally significant. We therefore grant Progeny's request for extensions of its mid-term and
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2620A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2620A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2620A1.txt
  • is necessary to extend the implementation deadline for this condition to afford additional time for the Commission to determine how the condition is to be implemented. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, that pursuant to Sections 4(i), 4(j), 303(r), and 310(d), of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 154(i), 154(j), 303(r) and 310(d), and authority delegated in Section 1.46 of our rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.46, the Applicants are granted an extension of time, sua sponte, until February 27, 2009, to fulfill their voluntary commitment to enter into long-term leases or other agreements to provide a Qualified Entity or Entities rights to four percent of the full-time audio channels on the Sirius platform and on the XM platform. FEDERAL
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2631A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2631A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2631A1.txt
  • we find that good cause exists to provide all parties an extension of time from December 3, 2008 to December 22, 2008 for filing reply comments in these proceedings. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to Sections 4(i), 4(j), and 5(c) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 154(i), 154(j), 155(c) and Sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.46 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.46, reply comments in these proceedings shall be filed on or before December 22, 2008. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Motion for Extension of Time for Reply Comments by the National Association of State Utility Consumer Advocates and the Motion for Extension of Time filed by the Rural Cellular Association
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2642A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2642A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2642A1.txt
  • that the deadline be delayed until 90 days after the issuance of a final court order on pending judicial challenges to the Commission's modified newspaper/broadcast cross-ownership rule. As a result, the new deadline for these filings is January 7, 2009. The Bureau previously extended the filing deadline until December 8, 2008 for the same purpose. Pursuant to 47 C.F.R. � 1.46, the Bureau hereby extends the filing deadline for the same reasons cited in the October 7, 2008 and November 7, 2008 Orders. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, that pursuant to delegated authority under Sections 4(i) and 303(r) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, and Sections 0.204, 0.283, and 1.46, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.204, 0.283, 1.46, a 30-day extension of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2773A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2773A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2773A1.txt
  • that the deadline be delayed until 90 days after the issuance of a final court order on pending judicial challenges to the Commission's modified newspaper/broadcast cross-ownership rule. As a result, the new deadline for these filings is February 9, 2009. The Bureau previously extended the filing deadline until January 7, 2009 for the same purpose. Pursuant to 47 C.F.R. � 1.46, the Bureau hereby extends the filing deadline for the same reasons cited in its previous extension orders. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, that pursuant to delegated authority under Sections 4(i) and 303(r) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, and Sections 0.204, 0.283, and 1.46, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.204, 0.283, 1.46, an extension of time is granted, sua sponte, until
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-282A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-282A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-282A1.txt
  • would be beneficial to the development of a complete record on the issues. Accordingly, we find that providing the extension of time requested in the CTIA motion serves the public interest. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to authority found in section 4(i) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. � 154(i), and sections 0.131, 0.331 and 1.46 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.131, 0.331, 1.46, the Motion by CTIA-The Wireless Association for Extension of Time IS GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that comments in this proceeding shall be due by March 14, 2008, and reply comments shall be due by April 14, 2008. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Fred B. Campbell, Jr. Chief Wireless Telecommunications Bureau See
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-515A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-515A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-515A1.txt
  • of the broad and material effects of this proceeding. They submit that additional time to prepare comments and reply comments will cause no hardship or prejudice to other interested parties or to the Commission and will facilitate the development of a more complete and meaningful record. No oppositions have been filed to the requested extension. As set forth in Section 1.46(a) of the Commission's Rules, the Commission's policy is that extensions of time for filing comments in rulemaking proceedings shall not be routinely granted. In this case, however, we agree that an extension of the comment and reply comment period is warranted to enable commenters to adequately review, investigate, and comment on the specific issues raised in the NPRM and respond
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-582A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-582A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-582A1.txt
  • without significant loss of momentum in addressing the issues, and is therefore reasonable and in the public interest. Thus, reply comments in this matter shall be filed on or before April 22, 2008. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 5(c) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. �� 154(i), 154(j), 155(c), and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.46 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.46, the Motions for Extension of Time to file comments and replies in the above-captioned proceeding ARE GRANTED to the extent indicated in this Order and are otherwise DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Julie A. Veach Deputy Chief Wireline Competition Bureau Implementation of Section 224 of the Act; Amendment of the Commission's
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-674A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-674A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-674A1.txt
  • comments and reply comments in response to the Notices are extended from April 3, 2008, to April 17, 2008, and from May 5, 2008, to May 19, 2008, respectively. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 5(c) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 154(i), 154(j), 155(c), and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.46 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.46, the pleading cycle established in this matter shall be modified as follows: Comments Due: April 17, 2008 Reply Comments Due: May 19, 2008 FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Jeremy D. Marcus Acting Associate Chief Wireline Competition Bureau Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service, WC Docket No. 05-337, CC Docket No. 96-45, Notice
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-823A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-823A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-823A1.txt
  • the United Church of Christ (``UCC'') submitted a Motion for Extension of Time to file Oppositions to the NCTA stay request. While an Opposition to the NCTA stay request would be due April 4, 2008, UCC requests an extension until April 11, 2008. On April 3, 2008, NCTA filed an Opposition to the UCC Motion. As set forth in Section 1.46 of the Commission's Rules, the Commission's policy is that extensions of time shall not be routinely granted. In this case, however, an extension of the time for filing Oppositions to the NCTA stay request is warranted. UCC notes that the NCTA stay request was not available until March 31, 2008, leaving UCC and other interested parties with only four days
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-93A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-93A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-93A1.txt
  • January 17, 2008 to February 19, 2008 to file comments in this proceeding and an extension of time from February 6, 2008 to March 14, 2008 to file reply comments in this proceeding. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 5(c) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. �� 154(i), 154(j), 155(c), and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.46 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.46, comments in this matter shall be filed on or before February 19, 2008 and reply comments shall be filed on or before March 14, 2008. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the motion of United States Telecom Association IS GRANTED, to the extent set forth herein, and is otherwise DENIED. FEDERAL
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1212A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1212A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1212A1.txt
  • implementation guidelines in the very near future, and thus this brief extension is appropriate. The Commission will address any additional timing issues in its implementation order. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, that pursuant to Sections 4(i), 4(j), 303(r), and 310(d), of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 154(i), 154(j), 303(r) and 310(d), and authority delegated in Section 1.46 of our rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.46, Sirius XM is granted an extension of time, sua sponte, until June 29, 2009, to fulfill its voluntary commitment to enter into long-term leases or other agreements to provide a Qualified Entity or Entities rights to four percent of the full-time audio channels on the Sirius platform and on the XM platform. FEDERAL
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1255A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1255A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1255A1.txt
  • the Commission's consideration of the issues. 4. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that the Motion to Extend the Comment Period filed by Sorenson Communications, Inc., IS GRANTED to the extent indicated herein. Comments are now due by July 6, 2009, and reply comments are due by July 20, 2009. 5. This action is taken pursuant to the authority provided in Section 1.46 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.46, and under delegated authority pursuant to Sections 0.141 and 0.361 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.141, 0.361. 6. To request materials in accessible formats (such as Braille, large print, electronic files, or audio format), send an e-mail to fcc504@fcc.gov or call the Consumer & Governmental Affairs Bureau at 202-418-0530 (voice),
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1286A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1286A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1286A1.txt
  • the issuance of a final court order on pending judicial challenges to the Commission's modified newspaper/broadcast cross-ownership rule. As a result, the new deadline for these filings is August 10, 2009. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, that pursuant to authority under Sections 4(i) and 303(r) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 154 and 303(r), and Section 1.46 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.46, and pursuant to authority delegated to the Media Bureau pursuant to Sections 0.204 and 0.283 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.204, 0.283, an extension of time as described above IS GRANTED, sua sponte, until August 10, 2009. This Order does not constitute action on the Media Parties' request to further
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1419A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1419A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1419A1.txt
  • the public interest. Accordingly, we hereby grant the above-described request for extension of time filed in WT Docket No. 09-66. The deadline for filing reply comments is extended to July 13, 2009. This action is taken pursuant to authority found in Sections 4(i) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. � 154(i), and Sections 0.131, 0.331, and 1.46 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.131, 0.331, and 1.46. For further information, contact Chelsea Fallon, Spectrum & Competition Policy Division, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau, at chelsea.fallon@fcc.gov or (202) 418-7991, or Pramesh Jobanputra, Spectrum & Competition Policy Division, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau, at pramesh.jobanputra@fcc.gov or (202) 418-1323. By the Acting Chief, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau -FCC- See Wireless Telecommunications Bureau Seeks Comment
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1419A1_Rcd.pdf
  • July 13, 2009. 1SeeWireless Telecommunications Bureau Seeks Comment on Commercial Mobile Radio Services Market Competition, Public Notice, WT Docket No. 09-66, DA 09-1070 (WTB rel. May 14, 2009) ("Public Notice"). 2CTIA �The Wireless Association and Rural Telecommunications Group, Inc. Request for Extension of Reply Comment Deadline, WT Docket No. 09-66 (filed June 19, 2009) ("Request"). 3Requestat 1. 4See47 C.F.R. � 1.46(a). 8490 This action is taken pursuantto authority found in Sections 4(i) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. � 154(i), and Sections 0.131, 0.331, and 1.46 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.131, 0.331, and 1.46. For further information, contact Chelsea Fallon, Spectrum & Competition Policy Division, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau, at chelsea.fallon@fcc.gov or (202) 418-7991, or
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1420A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1420A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1420A1.txt
  • 706 inquiry, to comment on the broadband issues pending before the Commission. We therefore do not expect to grant any further extensions with regard to the development of the Plan absent extraordinary circumstances. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 5(c) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. �� 154(i), l54(j), 155(c) and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.46 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.46, the due date for filing reply comments in response to the National Broadband Plan NOI in this docket IS EXTENDED to July 21, 2009. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the NASUCA et al. Motion for Extension of Time and the CTIA et al. Motion for Extension of Time ARE GRANTED
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1474A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1474A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1474A1.txt
  • of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.331 and 1.931, the Request for Special Temporary Authority filed by Kevin R. Nida on October 27, 2006, FCC File No. 0002799178, shall be DISMISSED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to Sections 4(i) and 303(r) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 154(i), 303(r), and Sections 1.41 and 1.46 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.41, 1.46, the Motion for Extension of Time filed by James A. Kay, Jr. on November 15, 2006, the Motion to Strike James A. Kay's Opposition to Request for Stay filed by Kevin R. Nida on November 28, 2006, the Motion to Strike Motion to Strike MRA's Opposition to Request for Stay filed
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1474A1_Rcd.pdf
  • of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.331 and 1.931, the Request for Special Temporary Authority filed by Kevin R. Nida on October 27, 2006, FCC File No. 0002799178, shall be DISMISSED. 33. ITIS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to Sections 4(i) and 303(r) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 154(i), 303(r), and Sections 1.41 and 1.46 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.41, 1.46, the Motion for Extension of Time filed by James A. Kay, Jr. on November15, 2006, the Motion to Strike James A. Kay's Opposition to Request for Stay filed by Kevin R. Nida on November28, 2006, the Motion to Strike Motion to Strike MRA's Opposition to Request for Stay filed by Kevin
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1484A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1484A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1484A1.txt
  • implementation guidelines in the very near future, and thus this brief extension is appropriate. The Commission will address any additional timing issues in its implementation order. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, that pursuant to Sections 4(i), 4(j), 303(r), and 310(d), of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 154(i), 154(j), 303(r) and 310(d), and authority delegated in Section 1.46 of our rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.46, Sirius XM is granted an extension of time, sua sponte, until August 28, 2009, to fulfill its voluntary commitment to enter into long-term leases or other agreements to provide a Qualified Entity or Entities rights to four percent of the full-time audio channels on the Sirius platform and on the XM platform. FEDERAL
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1725A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1725A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1725A1.txt
  • 1. See, e.g., Letter from Robert Sepe, Action Audits, LLC, consultant to the County, to Mr. Giroux, dated March 16, 2009 (``March 16 Letter''); Letter from Mr. Giroux to Mr. Sepe, dated March 27, 2009 (``March 27 Letter''). Opposition to Petition for Special Relief (``Opposition''), dated April 15, 2009. Reply to Opposition (``Reply''), dated May 20, 2009. 47 C.F.R. � 1.46(a). E-mails to John W. Beresford, Esq., Commission counsel, from Ms. Catherine Rice, Action Audits, LLC, dated February 23 and April 10, 2009; Consent Motion for Extension of Time filed by Charter and dated April 28, 2009. Another factor necessitating an extension for the County to file its Opposition was an error in the Commission's Public Notice of the filing of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1730A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1730A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1730A1.txt
  • the issuance of a final court order on pending judicial challenges to the Commission's modified newspaper/broadcast cross-ownership rule. As a result, the new deadline for these filings is October 9, 2009. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, that pursuant to authority under Sections 4(i) and 303(r) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 154 and 303(r), and Section 1.46 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.46, and pursuant to authority delegated to the Media Bureau pursuant to Sections 0.204 and 0.283 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.204, 0.283, an extension of time as described above IS GRANTED, sua sponte, until October 9, 2009. This Order does not constitute action on the Media Parties' request to further
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1754A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1754A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1754A1.txt
  • extension of time from August 27, 2009 to September 10, 2009 for filing reply comments in this proceeding. This additional time will facilitate the development of a more complete record in this proceeding. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 5(c) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 154(i), 154(j), 155(c), section 1.46 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.46, and pursuant to the authority delegated in sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, comments in this proceeding shall be filed on or before August 31, 2009 and reply comments in this proceeding shall be filed on or before September 10, 2009. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1784A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1784A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1784A1.txt
  • the implementation guidelines in the near future, and thus this brief extension is appropriate. The Commission will address any additional timing issues in its implementation order. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, that pursuant to Sections 4(i), 4(j), 303(r), and 310(d), of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 154(i), 154(j), 303(r) and 310(d), and authority delegated in Section 1.46 of our rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.46, Sirius XM is granted an extension of time, sua sponte, until October 27, 2009, to fulfill its voluntary commitment to enter into long-term leases or other agreements to provide a Qualified Entity or Entities rights to four percent of the full-time audio channels on the Sirius platform and on the XM platform. FEDERAL
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-202A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-202A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-202A1.txt
  • the issuance of a final court order on pending judicial challenges to the Commission's modified newspaper/broadcast cross-ownership rule. As a result, the new deadline for these filings is April 10, 2009. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, that pursuant to authority under Sections 4(i) and 303(r) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 154 and 303(r), and Section 1.46 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.46, and pursuant to authority delegated to the Media Bureau pursuant to Sections 0.204 and 0.283 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.204, 0.283, an extension of time as described above IS GRANTED, sua sponte, until April 10, 2009. This Order does not constitute action on the Media Parties' request to further
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2044A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2044A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2044A1.txt
  • copies of the requests were served on the affected licensees, and no oppositions were filed. Thus, we grant Clearwire an extension of time to transition the Abilene, Texas, Temple-Killeen, Texas, and Waco, Texas BTAs until March 15, 2010. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to Section 4(i) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. � 154(i), and Sections 1.46 and 27.1232(b)(1)(vi) of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.46, 27.1232(b)(1)(vi) that the Request for Extension of Time filed by Clearwire Spectrum Holdings, LLC for the Abilene, Texas BTA and by NSAC, LLC for the Brownwood, Texas BTA on February 17, 2009 ARE DISMISSED AS MOOT. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to Section 4(i) of the Communications Act of 1934,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2044A1_Rcd.pdf
  • copies of the requests were served on the affected licensees, and no oppositions were filed. Thus, we grant Clearwire an extension of time to transition the Abilene, Texas, Temple-Killeen, Texas, and Waco, Texas BTAs until March 15, 2010. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to Section 4(i) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. � 154(i), and Sections 1.46 and 27.1232(b)(1)(vi) of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.46, 27.1232(b)(1)(vi) that the Request for Extension of Time filed by Clearwire Spectrum Holdings, LLC for the Abilene, Texas BTA and by NSAC, LLC for the Brownwood, Texas BTA on February 17, 2009 ARE DISMISSED AS MOOT. 42007 Letters at 1. SeeSprint Nextel Corporation and Clearwire Corporation, WT Docket No. 08-94,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2045A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2045A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2045A1.txt
  • in the BTA, and Clearwire can continue operating pursuant to the old band plan until the transition is completed. Thus, we grant Clearwire an additional extension of time to transition the Bellingham, Washington BTA until March 15, 2010. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to Section 4(i) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. � 154(i), and Sections 1.46 and 27.1232(b)(1)(vi) of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.46, 27.1232(b)(1)(vi) that the Requests for Extension of Time filed by Fixed Wireless Holdings, LLC on January 29, 2009, March 30, 2009, and August 27, 2009 ARE GRANTED, and the time for completing the transition in the Bellingham, Washington Basic Trading Area (BTA 36) IS EXTENDED TO March 15, 2010. This
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2045A1_Rcd.pdf
  • licensees in the BTA, and Clearwire can continue operating pursuant to the old band plan until the transitionis completed. Thus, we grant Clearwire an additional extension of time to transition the Bellingham, Washington BTA until March 15, 2010. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to Section 4(i) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. � 154(i), and Sections 1.46 and 27.1232(b)(1)(vi) of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.46, 27.1232(b)(1)(vi) that the Requests for Extension of Time filed by Fixed Wireless Holdings, LLC on January 29, 2009, March 30, 2009, and August 27, 2009 ARE GRANTED, and the time for completing the transition in the Bellingham, Washington Basic Trading Area (BTA 36) IS EXTENDED TO March 15, 2010. This
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2050A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2050A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2050A1.txt
  • is completed. We note that copies of the requests were served on the affected licensees, and no oppositions were filed. Thus, we grant Clearwire an extension of time to transition the Dubuque, Iowa BTA until March 15, 2010. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to Section 4(i) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. � 154(i), and Sections 1.46 and 27.1232(b)(1)(vi) of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.46, 27.1232(b)(1)(vi) that the Requests for Extension of Time filed by NSAC, LLC on March 19, 2009 and August 25, 2009 ARE GRANTED, and the time for completing the transition in the Dubuque, Iowa Basic Trading Area (BTA 118) IS EXTENDED TO March 15, 2010. This action is taken under delegated
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2050A1_Rcd.pdf
  • is completed. We note that copies of the requests were served on the affected licensees, and no oppositions were filed. Thus, we grant Clearwire an extension of time to transition the Dubuque, Iowa BTA until March 15, 2010. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to Section 4(i) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. � 154(i), and Sections 1.46 and 27.1232(b)(1)(vi) of the Commission's Rules, 47 1Letter from Nadja S. Sodos-Wallace, Clearwire Corporation, to Office of the Secretary, Federal Communications Commission, WT Docket No. 06-136 (filed Mar. 19, 2009) (Clearwire First Letter). 2Letter from Nadja S. Sodos-Wallace, Clearwire Corporation, to Office of the Secretary, Federal Communications Commission, WT Docket No. 06-136 (filed Aug. 25, 2009) (Clearwire Second Letter). 3SeeInitiation
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2051A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2051A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2051A1.txt
  • is completed. We note that copies of the requests were served on the affected licensees, and no oppositions were filed. Thus, we grant Clearwire an extension of time to transition the Madison, Wisconsin BTA until March 15, 2010. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to Section 4(i) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. � 154(i), and Sections 1.46 and 27.1232(b)(1)(vi) of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.46, 27.1232(b)(1)(vi) that the Request for Extension of Time filed by Clearwire on March 19, 2009 IS GRANTED, and the time for completing the transition in the Madison, Wisconsin Basic Trading Area (BTA 272) IS EXTENDED TO March 15, 2010. This action is taken under delegated authority pursuant to Sections 0.131
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2051A1_Rcd.pdf
  • is completed. We note that copies of the requests were served on the affected licensees, and no oppositions were filed. Thus, we grant Clearwire an extension of time to transition the Madison, Wisconsin BTA until March 15, 2010. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to Section 4(i) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. � 154(i), and Sections 1.46 and 27.1232(b)(1)(vi) of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.46, 27.1232(b)(1)(vi) that the Request for Extension of Time filed by Clearwire on March 19, 1Letter from Nadja S. Sodos-Wallace, Clearwire Corporation, to Office of the Secretary, Federal Communications Commission, WT Docket No. 06-136 (filed Mar. 19, 2009) (Clearwire First Letter). 2Letter from Nadja S. Sodos-Wallace, Clearwire Corporation, to Office of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2081A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2081A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2081A1.txt
  • 15, 2009 and reply comments are to be filed on or before November 5, 2009. All other filing requirements set forth in the Public Notice establishing the original pleading cycle remain in effect. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 5(c) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 154(i), 154(j), 155(c), section 1.46 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.46, and pursuant to the authority delegated in sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, comments in this proceeding shall be filed on or before October 15, 2009 and reply comments shall be filed on or before November 5, 2009. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Request
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2082A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2082A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2082A1.txt
  • (together, the remands), the Bureau extended the comment and reply comment due dates in this proceeding to match those in the remanded proceedings. The current deadline for filing comments on the Qwest Phoenix MSA Petition is September 21, 2009 and the deadline for filing replies is October 6, 2009. On September 3, 2009, Qwest filed a request, pursuant to section 1.46 of the Commission's rules, asking the Commission to extend the reply comment deadline from October 6, 2009 to October 21, 2009. Qwest makes this request ``to allow parties sufficient time to address the complex set of legal and economic issues likely to be raised in the initial comments.'' Qwest states that ``parties would need at least a month to provide
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2083A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2083A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2083A1.txt
  • one of these proceedings. Parties therefore have until October 21, 2009 to file reply comments. All other filing requirements set forth in the Public Notice establishing the initial pleading cycle remain in effect. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 5(c) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 154(i), 154(j), 155(c), section 1.46 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.46, and pursuant to the authority delegated in sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, reply comments in this proceeding shall be filed on or before October 21, 2009. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Julie A. Veach Deputy Bureau Chief Wireline Competition Bureau See Wireline Competition Bureau Seeks Comment
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2166A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2166A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2166A1.txt
  • the issuance of a final court order on pending judicial challenges to the Commission's modified newspaper/broadcast cross-ownership rule. As a result, the new deadline for these filings is January 7, 2010. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, that pursuant to authority under Sections 4(i) and 303(r) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 154 and 303(r), and Section 1.46 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.46, and pursuant to authority delegated to the Media Bureau pursuant to Sections 0.204 and 0.283 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.204, 0.283, an extension of time as described above IS GRANTED, sua sponte, until January 7, 2010. This Order does not constitute action on the Media Parties' request to further
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2204A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2204A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2204A1.txt
  • Cooperative and Clearwire Corporation on April 21, 2009 IS GRANTED, and the Request for Waiver filed by Northwest Communications Cooperative on April 25, 2007 IS DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE with respect to operations within the Williston, North Dakota BTA. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to Section 4(i) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. � 154(i), and Sections 1.46 and 27.1232(b)(1)(vi) of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.46, 27.1232(b)(1)(vi) that the time for completing the transition in the Williston, North Dakota Basic Trading Area IS EXTENDED TO February 1, 2012. This action is taken under delegated authority pursuant to Sections 0.131 and 0.331 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.131, 0.331. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION John J. Schauble
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2204A1_Rcd.pdf
  • Order and Second Report and Order,WT Docket No. 03-66, 21 FCC Rcd 5606, 5653 � 93 (2006). 11The Waiver Request remains pending with respect to NCC's operations at Bowbells, North Dakota. 12571 David L. Nace, Esq. Nadja Sodos-Wallace, Esq. ITIS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to Section 4(i) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. � 154(i), and Sections 1.46 and 27.1232(b)(1)(vi) of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.46, 27.1232(b)(1)(vi) that the time for completing the transition in the Williston, North Dakota Basic Trading Area IS EXTENDED TO February 1, 2012. This action is taken under delegated authority pursuant to Sections 0.131 and 0.331 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.131, 0.331. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION John J. Schauble
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2206A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2206A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2206A1.txt
  • we hereby grant a 21-day extension of time for reply comments filed in response to the NOI in this proceeding. The deadline for filing reply comments is extended to November 5, 2009. This action is taken pursuant to authority found in Sections 4(i) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. � 154(i), and Sections 0.131, 0.331, and 1.46 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.131, 0.331, and 1.46. . By the Chiefs, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau and Office of Engineering and Technology -FCC- Fostering Innovation and Investment in the Wireless Communications Market, GN Docket No. 09-157, A National Broadband Plan For Our Future, GN Docket No. 09-51, Notice of Inquiry, FCC 09-66 (rel. Aug. 27, 2009) (NOI). See
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2206A1_Rcd.pdf
  • Innovation and Investment Notice of Inquiry and Extends Comment and Reply Comment Deadlines, Public Notice, GN Docket No. 09-157, GN Docket No. 09-51, FCC 09-73 (rel. Sept. 10, 2009) ("Public Notice"). 4CTIA �The Wireless Association and Public Knowledge Joint Request for Extension of Reply Comment Deadline, GN Docket No. 09-157 (filed Oct. 2, 2009) ("Request"). 5Requestat 1-2. 6See47 C.F.R. � 1.46(a). 12579 the development of a complete record on the issues and that granting the extension of time requested by CTIA and Public Knowledge therefore serves the public interest. Accordingly, we hereby grant a 21-day extension of time for reply comments filed in response to the NOI in this proceeding. The deadline for filing reply comments is extended to November 5,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2207A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2207A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2207A1.txt
  • of time for reply comments filed in response to the Mobile Wireless Notice of Inquiry in WT Docket No. 09-66. The deadline for filing reply comments is extended to October 22, 2009. This action is taken pursuant to authority found in Sections 4(i) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. � 154(i), and Sections 0.131, 0.331, and 1.46 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.131, 0.331, and 1.46. For further information, contact Chelsea Fallon, Spectrum & Competition Policy Division, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau, at chelsea.fallon@fcc.gov or (202) 418-7991, or Pramesh Jobanputra, Spectrum & Competition Policy Division, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau, at pramesh.jobanputra@fcc.gov or (202) 418-1323. By the Chief, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau - FCC - Implementation of Section 6002(b) of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2207A1_Rcd.pdf
  • and 09-157 (filed Oct. 2, 2009) ("Joint Request"). The Joint Requestalso included a request to extend the deadline for filing reply comments in response to the Commission's Wireless Innovation NOI(Fostering Innovation and Investment inthe Wireless Communications Market, GN Docket No. 09-157, Notice of Inquiry, FCC 09-66 (rel. Aug. 27, 2009)) by 21 days. Id. 4Id., at 4. 5See47 C.F.R. � 1.46(a). 12581 submit an annual report to Congress on competition in the commercial mobile radio services market.6 Accordingly, we hereby grant a seven-day extension of time for reply comments filed in response to the Mobile Wireless Notice of Inquiryin WT Docket No. 09-66. The deadline for filing reply comments is extended to October 22, 2009. This action is taken pursuant to
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2271A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2271A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2271A1.txt
  • the implementation guidelines in the near future, and thus this brief extension is appropriate. The Commission will address any additional timing issues in its implementation order. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, that pursuant to Sections 4(i), 4(j), 303(r), and 310(d), of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 154(i), 154(j), 303(r) and 310(d), and authority delegated in Section 1.46 of our rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.46, Sirius XM is granted an extension of time, sua sponte, until February 24, 2010, to fulfill its voluntary commitment to enter into long-term leases or other agreements to provide a Qualified Entity or Entities rights to four percent of the full-time audio channels on the Sirius platform and on the XM platform. FEDERAL
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2471A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2471A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2471A1.txt
  • that a modest ten-day extension is appropriate. Parties therefore have until Thursday, December 10, 2009 to file comments and until Monday, December 21, 2009 to file reply comments. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to Sections 4(i), 4(j) and 5(c) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 154(i), 154(j) and 155(c), and Sections 0.61, 0.283, and 1.46 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.61, 0.283, and 1.46, the date for filing comments and reply comments in response to Intel's request for waiver of the IEEE 1394 output requirement ARE EXTENDED to December 10, 2009 and December 21, 2009, respectively. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Steven A. Broeckaert Senior Deputy Chief, Policy Division, Media Bureau See Texas Instruments, Inc.'s
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2493A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2493A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2493A1.txt
  • petitioner Montgomery County has consented to the extension. RCN will therefore have up to and including Wednesday, December 2, 2009 to file its opposition to Montgomery County's petition. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to Sections 4(i), 4(j) and 5(c) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 154(i), 154(j) and 155(c), and Sections 0.61, 0.283, and 1.46 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.61, 0.283, and 1.46, the date for RCN to file opposition to Montgomery County's petition for stay of the Order granting RCN special relief IS EXTENDED to December 2, 2009. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION John P. Wong Chief, Engineering Division, Media Bureau See RCN Corporation Motion for Extension of Time, CSR-8166 (filed Nov. 24,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2515A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2515A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2515A1.txt
  • C.F.R. � 1.4(c) (when Commission procedures require the computation of a period of time after an act occurs (absent public notice), ``the first day to be counted . . . is the day after the day on which the act . . . occurs''); see also Third E-Mail at 1. 47 C.F.R. � 1.106 (g, h). See 47 C.F.R. � 1.46(a). Second E-Mail at 1. Fourth E-Mail at 1. Petition, Exh. 1. Third E-Mail at 2; Petition, Exh. 2. 47 C.F.R. � 1.106 (g, h). See generally 47 C.F.R. �� 1.49 - .52. 47 C.F.R. � 0.283. (continued....) Federal Communications Commission DA 09-2515 Federal Communications Commission DA 09-2515 / 0 � � / 4 5
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2616A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2616A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2616A1.txt
  • the issuance of a final court order on pending judicial challenges to the Commission's modified newspaper/broadcast cross-ownership rule. As a result, the new deadline for these filings is April 7, 2010. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, that pursuant to authority under Sections 4(i) and 303(r) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 154 and 303(r), and Section 1.46 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.46, and pursuant to authority delegated to the Media Bureau pursuant to Sections 0.204 and 0.283 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.204, 0.283, an extension of time as described above IS GRANTED, sua sponte, until April 7, 2010. This Order does not constitute action on the Media Parties' request to further
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-433A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-433A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-433A1.txt
  • a Reply to Opposition to Consolidated Motion for Further Extension of Time (the ``Reply to Opposition to Extension Motion'') filed by Living Proof; and a Joint Request for Approval of Settlement Agreement (the ``Joint Request'') filed by Living Proof and the University. The Commission does not routinely grant extensions of time in which to file pleadings. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.46(a). It has done so, however, when, as here, parties require additional time to conclude a settlement agreement. See, e.g., Port Huron Family Radio, Inc., Memorandum Opinion and Order, 4 FCC Rcd 5617 (Rev. Bd. 1989). Accordingly, we grant the First, Second and Third Extension Motions. We dismiss Living Proof's Reply to Opposition to Extension Motion because � 1.45(d) of the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-53A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-53A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-53A1.txt
  • a digital set-top converter. Attachment 10-a Other Programming Channels January 1, 2007 Sample Group Local Broadcast Stations in HD Format (1) Most Highly Subscribed Digital Tier (2) N Mean S.E. Mean Mean S.E. Sample groups overall 672 5.0 0.09 620 37.5 0.64 Noncompetitive Communities 387 4.9 0.10 348 37.1 0.71 Communities relieved from rate regulation 285 5.4 0.25 272 39.3 1.46 Second cable operator subgroup (overall) 107 5.6 0.34 96 40.5 1.39 Second cable operator subgroup (incumbents) 55 5.9 0.42 55 39.4 1.65 Second cable operator subgroup (rivals) 52 4.5 0.36 41 45.4 1.77 DBS subgroup 78 5.2 0.37 76 39.7 2.21 Wireless MVPD subgroup 33 6.5 0.39 33 35.7 1.81 Low penetration test subgroup 67 3.6 0.31 67 38.5 1.58
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-747A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-747A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-747A1.txt
  • the issuance of a final court order on pending judicial challenges to the Commission's modified newspaper/broadcast cross-ownership rule. As a result, the new deadline for these filings is June 9, 2009. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, that pursuant to authority under Sections 4(i) and 303(r) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 154 and 303(r), and Section 1.46 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.46, and pursuant to authority delegated to the Media Bureau pursuant to Sections 0.204 and 0.283 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.204, 0.283, an extension of time as described above IS GRANTED, sua sponte, until June 9, 2009. This Order does not constitute action on the Media Parties' request to further
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-74A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-74A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-74A1.txt
  • is completed. We note that copies of the requests were served on the affected licensees, and no oppositions were filed. Thus, we grant Clearwire an extension of time to transition the BTAs noted above until February 28, 2009. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to Section 4(i) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. � 154(i), and Sections 1.46 and 27.1232(b)(1)(vi) of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.46, 27.1232(b)(1)(vi) that the Requests for Extension of Time filed by subsidiaries of Clearwire Corporation on November 13, 2008 ARE GRANTED, and the time for completing the transition in the Basic Trading Areas listed above IS EXTENDED TO February 28, 2009. This action is taken under delegated authority pursuant to Sections
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-75A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-75A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-75A1.txt
  • of this extension, particularly since licensees can continue operating pursuant to the old band plan until the transition is completed. Thus, we grant Clearwire an Extension of Time to transition BTA 36: Bellingham, Washington until February 2, 2009. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to Section 4(i) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. � 154(i), and Sections 1.46 and 27.1232(b)(1)(vi) of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.46, 27.1232(b)(1)(vi) that the Request for Extension of Time filed by Fixed Wireless Holdings, LLC on July 31, 2008 IS GRANTED, and the time for completing the transition in the Bellingham, Washington Basic Trading Area (BTA 36) IS EXTENDED TO February 2, 2009. This action is taken under delegated authority pursuant
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-76A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-76A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-76A1.txt
  • complete the transition to the new band plan. We expect all parties to act in good faith to communicate with each other and to take such steps as are necessary to complete the transition by the extended deadline. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to Section 4(i) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. � 154(i), and Sections 1.46 and 27.1232(b)(1)(vi) of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.46, 27.1232(b)(1)(vi) that the Requests for Extension of Time filed by NSAC, LLC on December 16, 2008 ARE GRANTED, and the time for completing the transition in the Basic Trading Areas listed above IS EXTENDED TO February 28, 2009. This action is taken under delegated authority pursuant to Sections 0.131 and
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-77A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-77A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-77A1.txt
  • is completed. We note that copies of the requests were served on the affected licensees, and no oppositions were filed. Thus, we grant Clearwire an extension of time to transition the BTAs noted above until February 28, 2009. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to Section 4(i) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. � 154(i), and Sections 1.46 and 27.1232(b)(1)(vi) of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.46, 27.1232(b)(1)(vi) that the Requests for Extension of Time filed by NSAC, LLC on December 16, 2008 ARE GRANTED, and the time for completing the transition in the Basic Trading Areas listed above IS EXTENDED TO February 28, 2009. This action is taken under delegated authority pursuant to Sections 0.131 and
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-78A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-78A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-78A1.txt
  • is completed. We note that copies of the requests were served on the affected licensees, and no oppositions were filed. Thus, we grant Polar an extension of time to transition the BTAs noted above until July 2, 2009. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to Section 4(i) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. � 154(i), and Sections 1.46 and 27.1232(b)(1)(vi) of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.46, 27.1232(b)(1)(vi) that the Request for Extension of Time filed by Polar Communications on December 3, 2008 IS GRANTED IN PART, and the time for completing the transition in Basic Trading Area 166 (Grand Forks, North Dakota) listed above IS EXTENDED TO July 2, 2009. This action is taken under delegated
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-794A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-794A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-794A1.txt
  • information concurrently, we are hereby extending the comment periods announced in the Order to coincide with the filing deadlines we establish for the 2008 data. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to Sections 4(i), 4(j), 403 and 628(g) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 154(i), 154(j), 403, and 548(g), and Sections 0.061, 0.204, 0.283, and 1.46 of the rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.061, 0.204, 0.283, and 1.46, the deadlines for responding to the Notice of Inquiry for the 14th Annual Report are extended, sua sponte, until May 20, 2009, for initial comments and June 20, 2009, for reply comments. For additional information, please contact Marcia Glauberman or Dana Scherer, Industry Analysis Division, Media Bureau, at (202)
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-852A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-852A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-852A1.txt
  • to strike portions of Houston's Statement of Position filed on June 3, 2008, alleging that Houston had improperly introduced new arguments and new evidence contrary to PSHSB's de novo review procedures. Houston opposed Sprint's request for confidentiality and motion to strike on June 19, 2008, and Sprint filed a reply to Houston's opposition on June 26, 2008. According to Section 1.46(a) of the Commission's rules, motions to accept late-filed pleadings are not to be granted routinely. The Bureau was explicit in its instructions that the parties were only to address designated issues specified in the extension, and that the mediation record would be closed after May 8, 2008. Accordingly, in rendering our decision in this dispute, we decline to consider any
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-907A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-907A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-907A1.txt
  • that the parties can resolve this matter amicably, and that a brief extension will assist in these endeavors. They request an extension until May 15, 2009 to either resolve this matter with the Town, or file their Opposition to the Application. The Town's Assistant Manager has consented to the requested extension. We grant Comcast's request. As set forth in Section 1.46(a) of the Commission's rules, the Commission's policy is that extensions of time shall not be routinely granted. Given the Town's failure to timely serve the Application on Comcast as well as the fact that the parties are trying to resolve this issue, we grant an extension of time to facilitate these discussions. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to Sections
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1000A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1000A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1000A1.txt
  • Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 27.1231, that within 30 days of the release of this Memorandum Opinion and Order, Fixed Wireless Holdings, LLC shall file an election in WT Docket No. 06-136 informing the Commission whether it wishes to continue to transition the remaining licenses in the Paris, Texas Basic Trading Area (BTA 341). IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to Sections 1.46 and 27.1232(b)(1)(vi) of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.46, 27.1232(b)(1)(vi), that if Fixed Wireless Holdings, LLC elects to transition the other stations in the Paris, Texas BTA, the Request for Extension of Time filed by Fixed Wireless Holdings, LLC on February 17, 2009 IS GRANTED, and the time for completing the transition in the Paris, Texas Basic Trading Area
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1000A1_Rcd.pdf
  • Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 27.1231, that within 30 days of therelease of this Memorandum Opinion and Order, Fixed Wireless Holdings, LLC shall file an election in WT Docket No. 06-136 informing the Commission whether it wishes to continue to transition the remaining licenses in the Paris, Texas Basic Trading Area (BTA 341). 26. ITIS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to Sections 1.46 and 27.1232(b)(1)(vi) of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.46, 27.1232(b)(1)(vi), that if Fixed Wireless Holdings, LLC elects to transition the other stations in the Paris, Texas BTA, the Request for Extension of Time filed by Fixed Wireless Holdings, LLC on February 17, 2009 IS GRANTED, and the time for completing the transition in the Paris, Texas Basic Trading Area
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1127A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1127A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1127A1.txt
  • Public Notice, CG Docket No. 09-158, CC Docket No. 98-170, WC Docket No. 04-36, DA 10-998 (rel. June 1, 2010) (Public Notice). Id. at 1. Motion of CTIA, The Wireless Association, for Extension of Comment Deadline, GN Docket No. 09-158, CC Docket No. 98-170, WC Docket No. 04-36 at 1 (filed June 18, 2010). Id. at 1. 47 C.F.R. � 1.46(a). 47 C.F.R. �� 1.415, 1.419. PUBLIC NOTICE News Media Information 202 / 418-0500 Internet: http://www.fcc.gov TTY: 1-888-835-5322 Federal Communications Commission 445 12th St., S.W. Washington, D.C. 20554 [ � � [ ��PNG r v ��"r�9 I'6� �d�Y�͆aX ���; Wh� �X,�aX���y�]\\.W`h���va6l! �v"]�V�at�������-``````�"m(c)x<��G�<���={-N��J%t�<== �"""x ҍ� � ��(c)���!��'' �R)&� �A�� "���\��v`` � 6� �� %B R # R 9" / 7 % /
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1181A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1181A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1181A1.txt
  • the issuance of a final court order on pending judicial challenges to the Commission's modified newspaper/broadcast cross-ownership rule. As a result, the new deadline for these filings is October 4, 2010. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, that pursuant to authority under Sections 4(i) and 303(r) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 154 and 303(r), and Section 1.46 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.46, and pursuant to authority delegated to the Media Bureau pursuant to Sections 0.204 and 0.283 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.204, 0.283, an extension of time as described above IS GRANTED, sua sponte, until October 4, 2010. This Order does not constitute action on the Media Parties' request to further
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1296A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1296A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1296A1.txt
  • of time shall not be routinely granted. In this instance, Mr. Anderson has not shown good cause for an extension of the deadline for filing comments and reply comments in this proceeding. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 5(c) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. �� 154(i) and 154(j), 155(c) and sections 0.41, 0.251, and 1.46 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.41, 0.251, 1.46, Mr. Anderson's motion for extension of the comment and reply periods IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Austin C. Schlick General Counsel Framework for Broadband Internet Service, GN Docket No. 10-127, FCC 10-114, Notice of Inquiry (rel. June 17, 2010). Motion of James W. Anderson for Extension of Time, GN Docket
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1317A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1317A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1317A1.txt
  • the requests were served on the affected licensees, and no oppositions were filed. Thus, we grant Clearwire an extension of time to transition the Miami-Fort Lauderdale, FL and West Palm Beach-Boca Raton, FL BTAs until January 15, 2011. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to Section 4(i) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. � 154(i), and Sections 1.46 and 27.1232(b)(1)(vi) of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.46, 27.1232(b)(1)(vi) that the Request for Extension of Time filed by Clearwire Spectrum Holdings II, LLC (CSHII) and WPSWP LLC on June 21, 2010 to complete the transition in the Miami-Fort Lauderdale, FL and West Palm Beach-Boca Raton, FL BTAs IS GRANTED, and the time for completing the transition in those
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1317A1_Rcd.pdf
  • of the requests were served on the affected licensees, and no oppositions were filed. Thus, we grant Clearwire an extension of time to transition the Miami-Fort Lauderdale, FL and West Palm Beach-Boca Raton, FL BTAs until January 15, 2011. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to Section 4(i) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �154(i), and Sections 1.46 and 27.1232(b)(1)(vi) of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.46, 27.1232(b)(1)(vi) that the Request for Extension of Time filed by Clearwire Spectrum Holdings II, LLC (CSHII) and WPSWP LLC on June 21, 2010 to complete the transition in the Miami- Fort Lauderdale, FL and West Palm Beach-Boca Raton, FL BTAs IS GRANTED, and the time for completing the transition in
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1357A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1357A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1357A1.txt
  • the issues and that granting the extension of time requested by the Federal Reserve will serve the public interest. We therefore extend the reply comment deadline to September 3, 2010. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to Sections 4(i) and 4(j) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 154(i) and (j), and Sections 0.191, 0.392, and 1.46 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.191, 0.392, and 1.46, the request for extension of time filed by the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System IS GRANTED, and the deadline for filing reply comments in response to the Notice IS EXTENDED to September 3, 2010. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Jeffery M. Goldthorp Chief Communications Systems Analysis Division Public
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1517A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1517A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1517A1.txt
  • parties will have an additional comment cycle after release of a notice of proposed rulemaking that will enable more focused discussion. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, that the Motion for Extension of Comment Period, filed by CSDVRS, LLC, Convo Communications, LLC, Purple Communications, Inc. and Snap Telecommunications, Inc., IS DENIED. This action is taken pursuant to the authority provided in Section 1.46 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.46, and under delegated authority pursuant to Sections 0.141 and 0.361 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.141, 0.361. To request materials in accessible formats (such as Braille, large print, electronic files, or audio format), send an e-mail to fcc504@fcc.gov or call the Consumer and Governmental Affairs Bureau at 202-418-0530 (voice), 202-418-0432
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1537A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1537A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1537A1.txt
  • 6, 2010 is extended to August 23, 2010. For further information regarding this Public Notice, please contact Richard Arsenault, Chief Counsel of the Wireless Telecommunications Bureau, Mobility Division, at (202) 418-0920, richard.arsenault@fcc.gov. Action taken pursuant to Sections 4(i), 4(j), and 303(r) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 154(i), 154(j), and 303(r), and Sections 0.131, 1.3, 1.46, and 1.106 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.131, 1.3, 1.46, and 1.106. By the Chief, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau -FCC- See Amendment of Parts 1, 22, 24, 27, 74, 80, 90, 95, and 101 To Establish Uniform License Renewal, Discontinuance of Operation, and Geographic Partitioning and Spectrum Disaggregation Rules and Policies for Certain Wireless Radio Services, WT Docket No.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1537A1_Rcd.pdf
  • August 6, 2010 is extended to August 23, 2010. For further information regarding this Public Notice, please contact RichardArsenault, Chief Counsel of the Wireless Telecommunications Bureau, Mobility Division, at (202) 418-0920, richard.arsenault@fcc.gov. Action taken pursuant to Sections 4(i), 4(j), and 303(r) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 154(i), 154(j), and 303(r), and Sections 0.131, 1.3, 1.46, and 1.106 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.131, 1.3, 1.46, and 1.106. By the Chief, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau -FCC- 347 C.F.R. � 1.106(g). 447 C.F.R. � 1.46. 5AT&T Motion at 2. 10916
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1558A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1558A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1558A1.txt
  • the implementation guidelines in the near future, and thus this brief extension is appropriate. The Commission will address any additional timing issues in its implementation order. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, that pursuant to Sections 4(i), 4(j), 303(r), and 310(d), of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 154(i), 154(j), 303(r) and 310(d), and authority delegated in Section 1.46 of our rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.46, Sirius XM is granted an extension of time, sua sponte, until November 21, 2010, to fulfill its voluntary commitment to enter into long-term leases or other agreements to provide a Qualified Entity or Entities rights to four percent of the full-time audio channels on the Sirius platform and on the XM platform. FEDERAL
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1672A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1672A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1672A1.txt
  • our Future, WC Docket No. 07-245, GN Docket No. 09-51, Order and Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, FCC 10-84 (rel. May 20, 2010). Pleading Cycle Established for Proposed Rules Implementing Section 224 of the Act, WC Docket No. 07-245, GN Docket No. 09-51, Public Notice, DA-10-1323 (rel. July 19, 2010). Motion at 1. Id. at 1-2. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.46(a). Implementation of Section 224 of the Act; Amendment of the Commission's Rules and Policies Governing Pole Attachments, WC Docket No. 07-245, Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, 22 FCC Rcd 20195 (2007) (Pole Attachment NPRM). See United States Telecom Association Petition for Rulemaking, RM-11293 (filed Oct. 11, 2005) (concerning pole attachment rates); Fibertech Networks, LLC, Petition for Rulemaking, RM-11303 (filed Dec. 7,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1742A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1742A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1742A1.txt
  • note that copies of the requests were served on the affected licensees, and no oppositions were filed. Thus, we grant Clearwire an extension of time to transition the Temple-Killeen, Texas and Waco, Texas BTAs until March 15, 2011. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to Section 4(i) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. � 154(i), and Sections 1.46 and 27.1232(b)(1)(vi) of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.46, 27.1232(b)(1)(vi) that the Requests for Extension of Time filed by NSAC, LLC on August 24, 2010 for the Temple-Killeen, Texas, and Waco, Texas ARE GRANTED, and the time for completing the transition in those BTAs IS EXTENDED TO March 15, 2011. This action is taken under delegated authority pursuant to
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1742A1_Rcd.pdf
  • We note that copies of the requests were served on the affected licensees, and no oppositions were filed. Thus, we grant Clearwire an extension of time to transitionthe Temple-Killeen, Texas and Waco, Texas BTAs until March 15, 2011. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to Section 4(i) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. � 154(i), and Sections 1.46 and 27.1232(b)(1)(vi) of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.46, 27.1232(b)(1)(vi) that the Requests for Extension of Time filed by NSAC, LLC on August 24, 2010 for the Temple-Killeen, Texas, and Waco, Texas ARE GRANTED, and the time for completing the transition in those BTAs IS EXTENDED TO March15, 2011. This action is taken under delegated authority pursuant to Sections
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1745A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1745A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1745A1.txt
  • in the BTA, and Clearwire can continue operating pursuant to the old band plan until the transition is completed. Thus, we grant Clearwire an additional extension of time to transition the Bellingham, Washington BTA until March 15, 2011. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to Section 4(i) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. � 154(i), and Sections 1.46 and 27.1232(b)(1)(vi) of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.46, 27.1232(b)(1)(vi) that the Request for Extension of Time filed by Fixed Wireless Holdings, LLC on August 24, 2010 IS GRANTED, and the time for completing the transition in the Bellingham, Washington Basic Trading Area (BTA 36) IS EXTENDED TO March 15, 2011. This action is taken under delegated authority pursuant
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1745A1_Rcd.pdf
  • in the BTA, and Clearwire can continue operating pursuant to the old band plan until the transition is completed. Thus, we grant Clearwire an additional extension of time to transition the Bellingham, Washington BTA until March 15, 2011. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to Section 4(i) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. � 154(i), and Sections 1.46 and 27.1232(b)(1)(vi) of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.46, 27.1232(b)(1)(vi) that the Request for Extension of Time filed by Fixed Wireless Holdings,LLC on August 24, 2010 IS GRANTED, and the time for completing the transition in the Bellingham, Washington Basic Trading Area (BTA 36) IS EXTENDED TO March 15, 2011. This action is taken under delegated authority pursuant to
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1850A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1850A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1850A1.txt
  • the issuance of a final court order on pending judicial challenges to the Commission's modified newspaper/broadcast cross-ownership rule. As a result, the new deadline for these filings is January 3, 2011. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, that pursuant to authority under Sections 4(i) and 303(r) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 154 and 303(r), and Section 1.46 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.46, and pursuant to authority delegated to the Media Bureau pursuant to Sections 0.204 and 0.283 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.204, 0.283, an extension of time as described above IS GRANTED, sua sponte, until January 3, 2011. This Order does not constitute action on the Media Parties' request to further
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1894A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1894A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1894A1.txt
  • (voice), (202) 418-0432 (TTY). FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Elizabeth Lyle, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau, (202) 418-1776; TTY (202) 418-1169 or email at Elizabeth.Lyle@fcc.gov. -FCC- Wireless Telecommunications Bureau And Consumer and Governmental Affairs Bureau Seek Comment on Accessible Mobile Phone Options for People who are Blind, Deaf-blind, or Have Low Vision, Public Notice, DA 10-1324 (July 19, 2010). See 47 C.F.R. � 1.46(a). 47 C.F.R. �� 1.415 and 1.419. PUBLIC NOTICE Federal Communications Commission 445 12th St., S.W. Washington, D.C. 20554 News Media Information 202 / 418-0500 Internet: http://www.fcc.gov TTY: 1-888-835-5322 � � � � F F F F F F � ��PNG r v ��"r�9 I'6� �d�Y�͆aX ���; Wh� �X,�aX���y�]\\.W`h���va6l! �v"]�V�at�������-``````�"m(c)x<��G�<���={-N��J%t�<== �"""x ҍ� � ��(c)���!��'' �R)&� �A�� "���\��v`` � 6� �� Z
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1894A1_Rcd.pdf
  • accessibility are preventing wireless communication access by these populations; (2) The cost and feasibilityof technical solutions to achieve wireless accessibility for these populations; 1Wireless Telecommunications Bureau And Consumer and Governmental Affairs Bureau Seek Comment on Accessible Mobile Phone Options for People who are Blind, Deaf-blind, or Have Low Vision, Public Notice, DA 10-1324 (July 19, 2010). 2See 47 C.F.R. � 1.46(a). 13717 (3) Reasons why there are not a greater number of wireless phones �particularly among less expensive or moderately-priced handset models �that are accessible to people who are blind or have vision loss; (4) Technical obstacles, if any, to making wireless technologies compatible with Braille displays, as well asthe cost and feasibility of technical solutions to achieve other forms of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1994A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1994A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1994A1.txt
  • (Waiver Request). Letter from Audrey Rasmussen to James Schlichting, Acting Chief, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau, dated March 25, 2009. See March 11, 2009 Accepted for Filing PN. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.948(j)(1)(iii) (Petitions to deny ``must be filed no later than 14 days following the date of the public notice listing the application as accepted for filing.''). See 47 C.F.R. � 1.46(a). 47 C.F.R. � 1.41. See also Petition at note 1 (requesting alternative treatment of the petition under section 1.41). Petition at 2. 47 C.F.R. � 1.955(a)(3) (emphasis added). Section 1.955(a)(3) also requires licensees to ``notify the Commission of the discontinuance of operations by submitting FCC Form 601 or 605 requesting license cancellation.'' Id. We note that an authorization automatically terminates
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1994A1_Rcd.pdf
  • File No. 0003736834 (Waiver Request). 5Letter from Audrey Rasmussen to James Schlichting, Acting Chief, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau, dated March 25, 2009. 6SeeMarch 11, 2009 Accepted for Filing PN. 7See47 C.F.R. � 1.948(j)(1)(iii) (Petitions to deny "must be filed no later than 14 days following the date of the public notice listing the application as accepted for filing."). 8See47 C.F.R. � 1.46(a). 14485 Federal Communications Commission DA 10-1994 sympathetic to PSI's claim that it needed more time to file merely because it had only learned of the application's pendency on March 24, 2009. PSI offers no explanation why it took it almost two full weeks from the date of public notice to learn of the proposed assignment. Nevertheless, we find that the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-207A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-207A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-207A1.txt
  • analyses and other submissions in response to the Public Notice, facilitating the compilation of a more complete record. We therefore extend the comment deadline to Friday, May 7, 2010. 4. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to Sections 4(i) and 4(j) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 154(i) and (j), and Sections 0.61, 0.283, and 1.46 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.61, 0.283, and 1.46, the Motion for Extension of Time filed by the Public Broadcasting National Organizations IS GRANTED, and the deadline for filing comments in response to the Public Notice IS EXTENDED to May 7, 2010. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION William T. Lake Chief, Media Bureau FCC Launches Examination of the Future of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2091A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2091A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2091A1.txt
  • of the requests were served on the affected licensees, and no oppositions were filed. Thus, we grant Clearwire an extension of time to transition the San Juan, Puerto Rico and Mayag�ez/Aguadilla-Ponce, Puerto Rico BTAs until December 29, 2010. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to Section 4(i) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. � 154(i), and Sections 1.46 and 27.1232(b)(1)(vi) of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.46, 27.1232(b)(1)(vi) that the Request for Extension of Time filed by NSAC, LLC on October 18, 2010 for the San Juan, Puerto Rico and Mayag�ez/Aguadilla-Ponce, Puerto Rico BTAs IS GRANTED, and the time for completing the transition in those BTAs IS EXTENDED TO December 29, 2010. This action is taken under
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2091A1_Rcd.pdf
  • the requests were served on the affected licensees, and no oppositions were filed. Thus, we grant Clearwire an extension of time to transition the San Juan, Puerto Rico and Mayag�ez/Aguadilla- Ponce, Puerto Rico BTAs until December 29, 2010. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to Section 4(i) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. � 154(i), and Sections 1.46 and 27.1232(b)(1)(vi) of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.46, 27.1232(b)(1)(vi) that the Request for Extension of Time filed by NSAC, LLC on October 18, 2010 for the San Juan, Puerto Rico and Mayag�ez/Aguadilla-Ponce, Puerto Rico BTAs IS GRANTED, and the time for completing the transition in those BTAs IS EXTENDED TO December 29, 2010. This action is taken under
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2267A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2267A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2267A1.txt
  • these circumstances, the Bureau finds that the proposed extension of time will provide CSRIC working group members with the time to develop thorough recommendations for the CSRIC and meaningful comments in this proceeding. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 5(c) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. �� 154(i), 154(j), 155(c), and sections 0.191, 0.392, and 1.46 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.191, 0.392, 1.46, the Joint Request for Extension of Comment and Reply Comment Deadlines filed by the Association of Public-Safety Communications Officials - International, the National Emergency Number Association, the National Association of State 911 Administrators, CTIA - The Wireless Association, and the Telecommunications Industry Association, IS GRANTED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION James Arden
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2368A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2368A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2368A1.txt
  • the issuance of a final court order on pending judicial challenges to the Commission's modified newspaper/broadcast cross-ownership rule. As a result, the new deadline for these filings is, April 4, 2011. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, that pursuant to authority under Sections 4(i) and 303(r) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 154 and 303(r), and Section 1.46 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.46, and pursuant to authority delegated to the Media Bureau pursuant to Sections 0.204 and 0.283 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.204, 0.283, an extension of time as described above IS GRANTED, sua sponte, until, April 4, 2011. This Order does not constitute action on the Media Parties' request to further
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2379A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2379A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2379A1.txt
  • prepare full and informed comments and reply comments in this proceeding. Therefore, the revised comment and reply comment deadlines for the Bill Shock NPRM are January 10, 2011 and February 8, 2011, respectively. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 5(c) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. �� 154(i), 154(j), 155(c) and sections 0.141, 0.361, and 1.46 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.141, 0.361, and 1.46, the Joint Request for Extension of Comment and Reply Comment Deadlines filed by CTIA, the National Telecommunications Cooperative Association, the Rural Cellular Association, and the Rural Telecommunications Group in CG Docket Nos. 10-207 and 09-158 IS GRANTED. Federal Communications Commission Joel Gurin Chief, Consumer and Governmental Affairs Bureau See
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2429A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2429A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2429A1.txt
  • of the requests were served on the affected licensees, and no oppositions were filed. Thus, we grant Clearwire an extension of time to transition the San Juan, Puerto Rico and Mayag�ez/Aguadilla-Ponce, Puerto Rico BTAs until March 1, 2011. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to Section 4(i) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. � 154(i), and Sections 1.46 and 27.1232(b)(1)(vi) of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.46, 27.1232(b)(1)(vi) that the Request for Extension of Time filed by NSAC, LLC on December 9, 2010 for the San Juan, Puerto Rico and Mayag�ez/Aguadilla-Ponce, Puerto Rico BTAs IS GRANTED, and the time for completing the transition in those BTAs IS EXTENDED TO March 1, 2011. This action is taken under
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2429A1_Rcd.pdf
  • the requests were served on the affected licensees, and no oppositions were filed. Thus, we grant Clearwire an extension of time to transition the San Juan, Puerto Rico and Mayag�ez/Aguadilla- Ponce, Puerto Rico BTAs until March 1, 2011. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to Section 4(i) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. � 154(i), and Sections 1.46 and 27.1232(b)(1)(vi) of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.46, 27.1232(b)(1)(vi) that the Request for Extension of Time filed by NSAC, LLC on December 9, 2010 for the San Juan, Puerto Rico and Mayag�ez/Aguadilla-Ponce, Puerto Rico BTAs IS GRANTED, and the time for completing the transition in those BTAs IS EXTENDED TO March 1, 2011. This action is taken under
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-244A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-244A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-244A1.txt
  • deadline for filing reply comments in the above-captioned proceeding, originally February 17, 2010, to February 24, 2010. Parties must comply with all other procedures and filing requirements announced in the Analytical Framework PN. For further information, contact Marvin Sacks of the Pricing Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-2017 or marvin.sacks@fcc.gov. -- FCC -- 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.46. Parties Asked to Comment on Analytical Framework Necessary to Resolve Issues in the Special Access NPRM, WC Docket No. 05-25, RM 10593, Public Notice, DA 09-2388 (rel. Nov. 5, 2009) (``Analytical Framework PN''), 74 Fed. Reg. 63,702 (Dec. 4, 2009). (continued from previous page ...) (continued on next page...) PUBLIC NOTICE DA 10-244 Released: February 12, 2010 Federal Communications Commission
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-248A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-248A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-248A1.txt
  • extension of the deadline for filing reply comments from March 5, 2010 to March 12, 2010. Parties must comply with all other procedures and filing requirements announced in the CIPA PN. For further information, please contact Regina Brown, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7400 or TTY (202) 418-0484. - FCC - 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.46. Comment Sought on Notice of Proposed Rulemaking Regarding the E-rate Program and Compliance with the Protecting Children in the 21st Century Act, CC Docket No. 02-6, Public Notice, DA 10-102 (rel. Jan. 20, 2010) (``CIPA PN''). Id. PUBLIC NOTICE PUBLIC NOTICE Federal Communications Commission 445 12th St., S.W. Washington, D.C. 20554 News Media Information 202 / 418-0500 Internet: http://www.fcc.gov TTY:
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-251A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-251A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-251A1.txt
  • filing reply comments in the above-captioned proceeding from February 16, 2010 to February 23, 2010. Parties must comply with all other procedures and filing requirements announced in the Alltel Audit PN. For further information, please contact Jamie Susskind, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7400 or TTY (202) 418-0484. - FCC - 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.46. Comment Sought on Verizon/Alltel Management Trust Request for Review of a Decision of the Universal Service Administrative Company Against Alltel Corporation Concerning Audit Findings Relating to the Low-Income Program, WC Docket No. 03-109, Public Notice, DA 09-2639 (rel. Dec. 30, 2009) (``Alltel Audit PN''). Id. PUBLIC NOTICE PUBLIC NOTICE Federal Communications Commission 445 12th St., S.W. Washington, D.C. 20554 News
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-266A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-266A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-266A1.txt
  • Time (filed Feb. 12, 2010). CTIA, PCIA, and WCAI, Joint Request for Extension of Reply Comment Deadline (filed Feb. 12, 2010). See Wilson Motion at 1; Joint Request 1-2. Pursuant to the Public Notice, Comments were due on February 5, 2010. However, several comments were not posted on ECFS until February 12, 2010. Wilson Motion at 2. 47 C.F.R. � 1.46(a). PUBLIC NOTICE Federal Communications Commission 445 12th St., S.W. Washington, D.C. 20554 News Media Information 202 / 418-0500 Internet: http://www.fcc.gov TTY: 1-888-835-5322 � � $ ��PNG r v ��"r�9 I'6� �d�Y�͆aX ���; Wh� �X,�aX���y�]\\.W`h���va6l! �v"]�V�at�������-``````�"m(c)x<��G�<���={-N��J%t�<== �"""x ҍ� � ��(c)���!��'' �R)&� �A�� "���\��v`` � 6� �� ` � � � � � � � � � � � � ` �
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-266A1_Rcd.pdf
  • for filing reply comments until March 8, 2010. For further information, please contact Thomas Derenge of the Wireless Telecommunications Bureau, Mobility Division, at (202) 418-2451 or thomas.derenge@fcc.gov, or Erin McGrath of the Wireless Telecommunications Bureau, Mobility Division, at (202) 418-2042 or erin.mcgrath@fcc.gov. Action by the Chief, Mobility Division, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau. -FCC - 7Wilson Motion at 2. 847 C.F.R. � 1.46(a). 1438
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-270A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-270A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-270A1.txt
  • Number and Contact Information Form, OMB 3060-0824 (November 2009). Requests for Review of Decisions of the Universal Service Administrator by Alton Community Unit School District 11, et al., Schools and Libraries Universal Service Support Mechanism, File Nos. SLD-518052, et al., CC Docket No. 02-6, Order, DA No. 10-999 (rel. June 2, 2010) (Alton Community Order). 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.46. See Alton Community Order at paras. 10-12; Universal Service for Schools and Libraries, FCC Form 472, Billed Entity Applicant Reimbursement Form, OMB 3060- 0856, at 4 (April 2007); Schools and Libraries Universal Service Support Mechanism, CC Docket No. 02-6, Second Report and Order, Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, 18 FCC Rcd 9202, 9216 at para. 42 (2003). Alton Community Order
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-271A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-271A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-271A1.txt
  • Docket No. 08-166, and WT Docket No. 08-167. The deadline for filing comments is extended to March 1, 2010 and the deadline for filing reply comments is extended to March 22, 2010. This action is taken pursuant to authority found in Sections 4(i) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. � 154(i), and Sections 0.131, 0.331, and 1.46 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.131, 0.331, and 1.46. . By the Chiefs, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau and Office of Engineering Technology. - FCC - 75 Fed. Reg. 3682-3693 (Jan. 22, 2010); Revisions to Rules Authorizing the Operation of Low Power Auxiliary Stations in the 698-806 MHz Band, Public Interest Spectrum Coalition, Petition for Rulemaking Regarding Low Power Auxiliary
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-271A1_Rcd.pdf
  • Report and Order and Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, FCC 10-16 (rel. Jan. 15, 2010) (Wireless Microphones Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking). 2Motion for Extension of Deadline for Filing of Comments by Shure Incorprated, WT Docket No. 08-166, WT Docket No. 08-167, and ET Docket No. 10-24 (filed Feb. 17, 2010). 3Id. at 2. 4Id. at 3. 5See47 C.F.R. � 1.46(a). 1448 Shure therefore serves the public interest. Accordingly, we hereby grant a seven-day extension of time for comments and a seven-day extension for reply comments filed in response to the Wireless Microphones Further Notice of Proposed Rulemakingin ET Docket No. 10-24, WT Docket No. 08-166, and WT Docket No. 08-167. The deadline for filing comments is extended to March 1,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-297A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-297A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-297A1.txt
  • the implementation guidelines in the near future, and thus this brief extension is appropriate. The Commission will address any additional timing issues in its implementation order. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, that pursuant to Sections 4(i), 4(j), 303(r), and 310(d), of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 154(i), 154(j), 303(r) and 310(d), and authority delegated in Section 1.46 of our rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.46, Sirius XM is granted an extension of time, sua sponte, until May 25, 2010, to fulfill its voluntary commitment to enter into long-term leases or other agreements to provide a Qualified Entity or Entities rights to four percent of the full-time audio channels on the Sirius platform and on the XM platform. FEDERAL
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-306A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-306A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-306A1.txt
  • than the petitioners request will suffice; we therefore grant parties an extension until April 8, 2010 to file reply comments. We expect that this extension will help parties develop complete and useful replies. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 5(c) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. �� 154(i), l54(j), 155(c) and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.46 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.46, the due date for filing reply comments in response to the Notice of Proposed Rulemaking in GN Docket No. 09-191 and WC Docket No. 07-52 IS EXTENDED to April 8, 2010. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the MPAA Motion for Extension of Time and the Entertainment Guilds Motion for Extension
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-311A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-311A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-311A1.txt
  • requested by NAB therefore serves the public interest. We therefore extend the comment deadline to Monday, March 15, 2010, and the reply comment deadline to Tuesday, April 13, 2010. 4. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to Sections 4(i) and 4(j) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 154(i) and (j), and Sections 0.191, 0.392, and 1.46 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.191, 0.392, and 1.46, the Motion for Extension of Time filed by the National Association of Broadcasters IS GRANTED, and the deadlines for filing comments and reply comments in response to the Second FNPRM ARE EXTENDED to March 15, 2010 and April 13, 2010, respectively. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION James Arden Barnett. Jr., Rear
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-428A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-428A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-428A1.txt
  • in the BTA, and Clearwire can continue operating pursuant to the old band plan until the transition is completed. Thus, we grant Clearwire an additional extension of time to transition the Bellingham, Washington BTA until September 15, 2010. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to Section 4(i) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. � 154(i), and Sections 1.46 and 27.1232(b)(1)(vi) of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.46, 27.1232(b)(1)(vi) that the Request for Extension of Time filed by Fixed Wireless Holdings, LLC on February 18, 2010 IS GRANTED, and the time for completing the transition in the Bellingham, Washington Basic Trading Area (BTA 36) IS EXTENDED TO September 15, 2010. This action is taken under delegated authority pursuant
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-428A1_Rcd.pdf
  • licensees in the BTA, and Clearwirecan continue operating pursuant to the old band plan until the transition is completed. Thus, we grant Clearwire an additional extension of time to transition the Bellingham, Washington BTA until September 15, 2010. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to Section 4(i) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. � 154(i), and Sections 1.46 and 27.1232(b)(1)(vi) of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.46, 27.1232(b)(1)(vi) that the Request for Extension of Time filed by Fixed Wireless Holdings, LLC on February 18, 2010 IS GRANTED, and the time for completing the transition in the Bellingham, Washington Basic Trading Area (BTA 36) IS EXTENDED TO September 15, 2010. This action is taken under delegated authority pursuant
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-429A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-429A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-429A1.txt
  • note that copies of the requests were served on the affected licensees, and no oppositions were filed. Thus, we grant Clearwire an extension of time to transition the Temple-Killeen, Texas and Waco, Texas BTAs until September 15, 2010. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to Section 4(i) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. � 154(i), and Sections 1.46 and 27.1232(b)(1)(vi) of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.46, 27.1232(b)(1)(vi) that the Requests for Extension of Time filed by NSAC, LLC on February 18, 2010 for the Temple-Killeen, Texas, and Waco, Texas ARE GRANTED, and the time for completing the transition in those BTAs IS EXTENDED TO September 15, 2010. This action is taken under delegated authority pursuant to
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-429A1_Rcd.pdf
  • note that copies of the requests were served on the affected licensees, and no oppositions were filed. Thus, we grant Clearwire an extension of time to transition the Temple-Killeen, Texas and Waco, Texas BTAs until September 15, 2010. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to Section 4(i) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. � 154(i), and Sections 1.46 and 27.1232(b)(1)(vi) of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.46, 27.1232(b)(1)(vi) that the Requests for Extension of Time filed by NSAC, LLC on February 18, 2010 for the Temple-Killeen, Texas, and Waco, Texas ARE GRANTED, and the time for completing the transition in those BTAs IS EXTENDED TO September 15, 2010. This action is taken under delegated authority pursuant to
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-463A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-463A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-463A1.txt
  • the issuance of a final court order on pending judicial challenges to the Commission's modified newspaper/broadcast cross-ownership rule. As a result, the new deadline for these filings is July 6, 2010. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, that pursuant to authority under Sections 4(i) and 303(r) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 154 and 303(r), and Section 1.46 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.46, and pursuant to authority delegated to the Media Bureau pursuant to Sections 0.204 and 0.283 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.204, 0.283, an extension of time as described above IS GRANTED, sua sponte, until July 6, 2010. This Order does not constitute action on the Media Parties' request to further
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-536A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-536A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-536A1.txt
  • Corporation, (And Subsidiaries, Debtors-In-Possession), Assignors, to Time Warner Cable Inc. (Subsidiaries), Assignees; Adelphia Communications Corporation, (and Subsidiaries, Debtors-In-Possession), Assignors and Transferors, to Comcast Corporation (Subsidiaries), Assignees and Transferees; Comcast Corporation, Transferor, to Time Warner Inc., Transferee; Time Warner Inc., Transferor to Comcast Corporation, Transferee, Order, 20 FCC Rcd 11145 (June 24, 2005). Request at 1. See note 13 supra. Section 1.46(a) of the Commission's rules provides, ``It is the policy of the Commission that extensions of time shall not be routinely granted.'' 47 C.F.R. � 1.46(a). Request at 2. 47 C.F.R. � 0.283. (continued....) Federal Communications Commission DA 10-536 Federal Communications Commission DA 10-536 \ ] � " # # 0
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-569A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-569A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-569A1.txt
  • -FCC- See Applications Filed for the Transfer of Control of Hawaiian Telcom, Inc. and Hawaiian Telcom Services Company, Inc., Debtors-in-Possession, WC Docket No. 10-41, Public Notice, DA 10-409 (rel. March 10, 2010). Hawaiian Telcom, Inc. and Hawaiian Telcom Services Company, Inc. Request for Extension, WC Docket No. 10-41 (filed Mar. 30, 2010), at 1-2. Id. at 2. 47 C.F.R. � 1.46(a). See 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291 (describing bureau functions and delegated authority). PUBLIC NOTICE Federal Communications Commission 445 12th St., S.W. Washington, D.C. 20554 News Media Information 202 / 418-0500 Internet: http://www.fcc.gov TTY: 1-888-835-5322 9 : E J � � � � � " ��PNG r v ��"r�9 I'6� �d�Y�͆aX ���; Wh� �X,�aX���y�]\\.W`h���va6l! �v"]�V�at�������-``````�"m(c)x<��G�<���={-N��J%t�<== �"""x ҍ� � ��(c)���!��'' �R)&� �A��
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-576A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-576A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-576A1.txt
  • informal request for Commission action. We therefore deny Smartcomm's motion and dismiss its opposition. We also dismiss the letter filed by Concepts to Operations, which was late-filed and does not reflect that it was served on Sprint. ordering clauseS Accordingly, pursuant to Section 4(i) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. � 154(i), and Sections 0.191, 0.392, 1.46 and 90.677 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.191, 0.392, 90.677, the Motion for Leave to File Opposition or for Acceptance as Informal Objection filed by Smartcomm, L.L.C IS DENIED. It is FURTHER ORDERED, that the Opposition to Sprint Nextel Corporation's Request for Waiver of its Obligation to Relinquish Channels in the Interleaved, Expansion and Guard Bands, filed by
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-594A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-594A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-594A1.txt
  • that the ``many concerned parties'' attending the 2010 NAB Show in Las Vegas, which immediately precedes the current comment deadline, ``would lose a significant amount of preparation time and would have only two business days after the show ends to finalize and file their comments in response to the Public Notice.'' We grant NAB's request. As set forth in Section 1.46(a) of the Commission's Rules, the Commission's policy is that extensions of time shall not be routinely granted. Given the conclusion of the 2010 NAB Show shortly before the comment deadline, however, we grant an extension of time to facilitate the development of a full record. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to Sections 4(i), 4(j), and 303(r) of the Communications
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-607A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-607A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-607A1.txt
  • help parties develop complete and useful replies. We also remind interested parties of the upcoming staff workshop in this proceeding, which will take place as scheduled on April 28, 2010, in Seattle, Washington. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 5(c) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. �� 154(i), l54(j), 155(c) and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.46 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.46, the due date for filing reply comments in response to the Notice of Proposed Rulemaking in GN Docket No. 09-191 and WC Docket No. 07-52 IS EXTENDED to April 26, 2010. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Requests for Extension of Time filed by CTIA, the United States Telecom Association,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-622A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-622A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-622A1.txt
  • is appropriate under the current circumstances presented. We believe that a one-week extension of time appropriately balances the interests of commenting parties and will not unreasonably delay the resolution of the proceeding. Therefore, we grant an extension of time for the filing of comments from April 16, 2010 to April 23, 2010. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that pursuant to Section 1.46 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.46, the April 6, 2010 request of Sirius XM to extend the deadline for filing comments in this proceeding is GRANTED to the extent indicated. This action is taken under delegated authority pursuant to Sections 0.131 and 0.331 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.131, 0.331. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Julius P. Knapp
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-639A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-639A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-639A1.txt
  • the period for ORBIT Act comments ended on April 7, 2010, but that the comments by other parties are ``somewhat lengthy'' and states that it needs additional time to complete a thorough review of the filed comments. In response to Intelsat, ARTEL, Inc. (ARTEL) and Globecomm Systems Inc. (Globecomm) oppose Intelsat's two-week extension request. ARTEL and Globecomm state that Section 1.46 of the Commission's rules requires ``that a motion for an extension of time in which to reply to comments must be filed at least seven days before the filing deadline,'' which Intelsat failed to do in making its request two days prior to the reply comment deadline. ARTEL and Globecomm also contend that Intelsat's extension request is not due to
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-639A1_Rcd.pdf
  • the period for ORBIT Act comments ended on April 7, 2010, but that the comments by other parties are "somewhat lengthy" and states that it needs additional time to complete a thorough review of the filed comments.2 3. In response to Intelsat, ARTEL, Inc. (ARTEL) and Globecomm Systems Inc. (Globecomm) oppose Intelsat's two-week extension request.3ARTEL and Globecomm state that Section 1.46 of the Commission's rules requires "that a motion for an extension of time in which to reply to comments must be filed at least seven days before the filing deadline,"4which Intelsat failed to do in making its request two days prior to the reply comment deadline. ARTEL and Globecomm also contend that Intelsat's extension request is not due to "an
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-681A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-681A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-681A1.txt
  • and facilitate a comprehensive record. We believe that providing interested parties with a short period in which to file responses appropriately balances the interests of the parties and will not unreasonably delay the preparation of a timely submission to Congress. Accordingly, interested parties have until April 28, 2010 to file their responses. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that pursuant to Section 1.46 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.46, ARTEL and Globecomm's request to file surreplies in this proceeding is GRANTED to the extent indicated. This action is taken under delegated authority pursuant to Sections 0.51 and 0.261 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.51, 0.261. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mindel De La Torre Chief International Bureau International Bureau Report to
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-681A1_Rcd.pdf
  • the issuesraised and facilitate a comprehensive record. We believe that providing interested parties with a short period in which to file responses appropriately balances the interests of the parties and will not unreasonably delay the preparation of a timely submission to Congress. Accordingly, interested parties have until April28,2010 to file their responses. 3. ITIS HEREBY ORDERED that pursuant to Section 1.46 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.46, ARTEL and Globecomm's request to file surreplies in this proceeding is GRANTED to the extent indicated. 4. This action is taken under delegated authority pursuant to Sections 0.51 and 0.261 of the 1International Bureau Report to Congress Regarding The Orbit Act,Order Extending Comment Period, DA-10- 639A1, IB Docket No. 10-70 (April 14,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-70A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-70A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-70A1.txt
  • so is in the public interest. Accordingly, parties will have until Wednesday, February 24, 2010 to file comments and until Friday, March 26, 2010 to file reply comments. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to Sections 4(i), 4(j) and 5(c) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 154(i), 154(j), and 155(c), and Sections 0.61, 0.283, and 1.46 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.61, 0.283, and 1.46, the date for filing comments and reply comments in response to the NOI in this proceeding ARE EXTENDED to February 24, 2010 and March 26, 2010, respectively. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION William T. Lake, Chief, Media Bureau See Notice of Inquiry, In the Matter of Empowering Parents and Protecting Children
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-765A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-765A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-765A1.txt
  • Bureau Seeks Comment on Motorola, Inc. Request for Interpretation or Waiver of Section 90.267 of the Commission's Rules Regarding 450-470 MHz Band Low Power Operations, WT Docket No. 10-74, Public Notice, DA 10-465 (WTB rel. Mar. 19, 2010). 47 C.F.R. � 90.267. Motorola, Inc., Motion for Extension of Time to File Reply Comments (filed Apr. 28, 2010). 47 C.F.R. � 1.46(a). PUBLIC NOTICE Federal Communications Commission 445 12th St., S.W. Washington, D.C. 20554 News Media Information 202 / 418-0500 Internet: http://www.fcc.gov TTY: 1-888-835-5322 1 2 ��PNG r v ��"r�9 I'6� �d�Y�͆aX ���; Wh� �X,�aX���y�]\\.W`h���va6l! �v"]�V�at�������-``````�"m(c)x<��G�<���={-N��J%t�<== �"""x ҍ� � ��(c)���!��'' �R)&� �A�� "���\��v`` � 6� �� � � � � � � � � � � � � �
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-765A1_Rcd.pdf
  • Telecommunications Bureau Seeks Comment on Motorola, Inc. Request for Interpretation or Waiver of Section 90.267 of the Commission's Rules Regarding 450-470 MHz Band LowPower Operations, WT Docket No. 10-74, Public Notice, DA 10-465 (WTB rel. Mar. 19, 2010). 247 C.F.R. � 90.267. 3Motorola, Inc., Motion for Extension of Time to File Reply Comments (filed Apr. 28, 2010). 447 C.F.R. � 1.46(a). 4694
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-905A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-905A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-905A1.txt
  • operations. Second, if a licensee does not respond to a pre-transition data request, it may not object to the proponent's transition plan. Third, entities that lease EBS spectrum for a commercial purpose must pay their own transition costs. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to Section 4(i) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. � 154(i), and Sections 1.46 and 27.1232(b)(1)(vi) of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.46, 27.1232(b)(1)(vi) that the Request for Extension of Time filed by Fixed Wireless Holdings, LLC on September 10, 2009 IS GRANTED, and the time for completing the transition in the Willmar-Marshall, Minnesota BTA (BTA 477) IS EXTENDED TO November 22, 2010. This action is taken under delegated authority pursuant to Sections
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-905A1_Rcd.pdf
  • regardingInfo Link's operations.5Second, if a licensee does not respond to a pre-transition data request, it may not object to the proponent's transition plan.6Third, entities that lease EBS spectrum for a commercial purpose must pay their own transition costs.7 Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to Section 4(i) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. � 154(i), and Sections 1.46 and 27.1232(b)(1)(vi) of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.46, 27.1232(b)(1)(vi) that the Request for Extension of Time filed by Fixed Wireless Holdings, LLC on September 10, 2009 IS GRANTED, and the time for completing the transition in the Willmar-Marshall, Minnesota BTA (BTA 477) IS EXTENDED TO November 22, 2010. This action is taken under delegated authoritypursuant to Sections 0.131
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-927A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-927A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-927A1.txt
  • the implementation guidelines in the near future, and thus this brief extension is appropriate. The Commission will address any additional timing issues in its implementation order. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, that pursuant to Sections 4(i), 4(j), 303(r), and 310(d), of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 154(i), 154(j), 303(r) and 310(d), and authority delegated in Section 1.46 of our rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.46, Sirius XM is granted an extension of time, sua sponte, until August 23, 2010, to fulfill its voluntary commitment to enter into long-term leases or other agreements to provide a Qualified Entity or Entities rights to four percent of the full-time audio channels on the Sirius platform and on the XM platform. FEDERAL
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-999A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-999A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-999A1.txt
  • appropriate form was not submitted to USAC previously, we direct USAC to solicit submission of the invoice form no later than 15 calendar days from the release of this order and to remit payment associated with the solicited invoice form, if warranted, no later than 90 calendar days from the receipt of the invoice form. 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.46. See Universal Service for Schools and Libraries, FCC Form 472, Billed Entity Applicant Reimbursement Form, OMB 3060- 0856, at 4 (April 2007) (emphasis added) (FCC Form 472); Schools and Libraries Universal Service Support Mechanism, CC Docket No. 02-6, Second Report and Order, Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, 18 FCC Rcd 9202, 9216 at para. 42 (2003) (Schools and Libraries Second
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1046A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1046A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1046A1.txt
  • Comment and Reply Comment Deadlines, ET Docket No. 10-142, WT Docket Nos. 04-356, 07-195 (filed June 6, 2011) (``CTIA Request''); Sprint Nextel Request for Extension of Comment and Reply Comment Deadlines, ET Docket No. 10-142, WT Docket Nos. 04-356, 07-195 (filed Jun 7, 2011) (Sprint Nextel Request). CTIA Request at 2. Sprint Nextel Request at 2. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.46(a). 47 C.F.R. �� 1.1200 et seq. PUBLIC NOTICE Federal Communications Commission 445 12th St., S.W. Washington, D.C. 20554 News Media Information 202 / 418-0500 Internet: http://www.fcc.gov TTY: 1-888-835-5322 $ ��PNG r v ��"r�9 I'6� �d�Y�͆aX ���; Wh� �X,�aX���y�]\\.W`h���va6l! �v"]�V�at�������-``````�"m(c)x<��G�<���={-N��J%t�<== �"""x ҍ� � ��(c)���!��'' �R)&� �A�� "���\��v`` � 6� �� F
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1046A1_Rcd.pdf
  • Extension of Comment and Reply Comment Deadlines, ET Docket No. 10-142, WT Docket Nos. 04-356, 07-195 (filed June 6, 2011) ("CTIA Request"); Sprint NextelRequest for Extension of Comment and Reply Comment Deadlines, ET Docket No. 10-142, WT Docket Nos. 04-356, 07-195 (filed Jun 7, 2011) (Sprint Nextel Request). 3CTIA Requestat 2. 4Sprint Nextel Request at 2. 5See 47 C.F.R. � 1.46(a). 8450 granting a limited extension of time to file comments and reply comments is warranted to ensure the Commission obtains a complete and thorough record, but we do not believe that a 30-day extension is warranted. Accordingly, we find that an extension of the comment and reply comment deadlines by 21- days is in the public interest. Extending the comment
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1065A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1065A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1065A1.txt
  • the issuance of a final court order on pending judicial challenges to the Commission's modified newspaper/broadcast cross-ownership rule. As a result, the new deadline for these filings is, October 3, 2011. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, that pursuant to authority under Sections 4(i) and 303(r) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 154 and 303(r), and Section 1.46 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.46, and pursuant to authority delegated to the Media Bureau pursuant to Sections 0.204 and 0.283 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.204, 0.283, an extension of time as described above IS GRANTED, sua sponte, until, October 3, 2011. This Order does not constitute action on the Media Parties' request to further
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1078A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1078A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1078A1.txt
  • allowing the parties to discuss the complex technical issues at stake and develop consensus approaches that benefit consumers. Accordingly, we are extending the deadline for all comments and reply comments to July 25, and August 24, 2011, respectively. IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to section 4(i) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. � 154(i), and section 1.46 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.46, the joint request of Wilson Electronics, Inc. and Verizon Wireless, filed on June 16, 2011, is GRANTED and the deadline for filing comments in response to the Notice of Proposed Rulemaking is EXTENDED to July 25, 2011, and the deadline for filing reply comments is EXTENDED to August 24, 2011. This action
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1078A1_Rcd.pdf
  • allowing the parties to discuss the complex technical issues at stake and develop consensus approaches that benefit consumers. Accordingly, we are extending the deadline for all comments and reply comments to July 25, and August 24, 2011, respectively. 4. ITIS ORDERED that, pursuant to section 4(i) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. � 154(i), and section 1.46 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.46, the joint request of Wilson Electronics, Inc. and Verizon Wireless, filed on June 16, 2011, is GRANTED and the deadline for filing comments in response to the Notice of Proposed Rulemakingis EXTENDED to July 25, 2011, and the deadline for filing reply comments is EXTENDED to August 24, 2011. 1SeeAmendment of Parts
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1136A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1136A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1136A1.txt
  • allow Comcast sufficient time to review and answer the complaint, and provide the Media Bureau with a more extensive record, which may lead to a more expeditious resolution of the dispute. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to authority under Sections 4(i) and 303(r) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 154 and 303(r), and Section 1.46 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.46, and pursuant to authority delegated to the Media Bureau pursuant to Sections 0.204 and 0.283 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.204, 0.283, Comcast's Motion for Extension of Time IS GRANTED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION William T. Lake Chief, Media Bureau See Media Bureau Announces Filing of Complaint by Bloomberg L.P. Against
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1157A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1157A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1157A1.txt
  • hereby grant the above-described motion for extension of time and extend the comment filing deadline to July 8, 2011 and the reply comment deadline to July 21, 2011. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to Sections 4(i), 4(j), and 303(r) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 154(i), 154(j), and 303(r), and Sections 0.61, 0.283, and 1.46 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.61, 0.283, and 1.46, the Motion for Extension of Time filed by the National Cable & Telecommunications Association IS GRANTED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION William T. Lake Chief, Media Bureau Implementation of the Commercial Advertisement Loudness Mitigation (CALM) Act; MB Docket No. 11-93, Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, FCC 11-84 (rel. May 27, 2010) (``CALM
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1205A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1205A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1205A1.txt
  • document to the ATSC A/85 RP. Accordingly, we hereby grant the above-described motion for extension of time and extend the reply comment filing deadline to August 1, 2011. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to Sections 4(i), 4(j), and 303(r) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 154(i), 154(j), and 303(r), and Sections 0.61, 0.283, and 1.46 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.61, 0.283, and 1.46, the Motion for Extension of Time filed by the Advanced Television Systems Committee, Inc. IS GRANTED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION William T. Lake Chief, Media Bureau Implementation of the Commercial Advertisement Loudness Mitigation (CALM) Act; MB Docket No. 11-93, Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, FCC 11-84 (rel. May 27, 2010) (``CALM
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1215A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1215A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1215A1.txt
  • there would be favorable action on any request for extension of time to demonstrate substantial service from licensees in these markets. Such requests would be considered pursuant to the standards contained in Section 1.946(e) of the Commission's Rules. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to Section 4(i) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. � 154(i), and Sections 1.46 and 27.1232(b)(1)(vi) of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.46, 27.1232(b)(1)(vi) that the Request for Extension of Time filed by Clearwire Spectrum Holdings II, LLC and WPSWP LLC on July 6, 2011 to complete the transition in the Miami-Fort Lauderdale, FL and West Palm Beach-Boca Raton, FL BTAs IS GRANTED, and the time for completing the transition in those BTAs
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1215A1_Rcd.pdf
  • 1, 2011. See 47 C.F.R. � 27.14(o). Our records indicate that all BRS licensees in the Miami-Fort Lauderdale, FL and West Palm Beach-Boca Raton, FL BTAs filed substantial service showings. 12See47 C.F.R. � 1.946(e). 10296 Nadja S. Sodos-Wallace Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to Section 4(i) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. � 154(i), and Sections 1.46 and 27.1232(b)(1)(vi) of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.46, 27.1232(b)(1)(vi) that the Request for Extension of Time filed by Clearwire Spectrum Holdings II, LLC and WPSWP LLC on July 6, 2011 to complete the transition in the Miami-Fort Lauderdale, FL and West Palm Beach-Boca Raton, FL BTAs IS GRANTED, and the time for completing the transition in those BTAs
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1374A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1374A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1374A1.txt
  • days for filing comments and 30 days for filing reply comments, asserting that such an extension is warranted because of the scope of the issues raised in the Public Notice. On August 5, 2011, the National Association of Regulatory Utility Commissioners filed a motion seeking an extension for the same time periods as requested by the Consumer Advocates. Under Section 1.46(a) of the Commission's rules, it is the policy of the Commission that extensions of time shall not be routinely granted. We do not find that the circumstances presented here warrant granting an extension. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 5(c) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 154(i), 154(j), 155(c), section
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1374A1_Rcd.pdf
  • the Universal Service-Intercarrier Compensation Transformation Proceeding, Public Notice, WC Docket Nos. 10-90, 07-135, 05-337, 03-109; GN Docket No. 09-51; CC Docket Nos. 01-92, 96- 45, DA 11-1348 (rel. Aug. 3, 2011). 11225 Federal Communications Commission DA 11-1374 Regulatory Utility Commissioners filed a motion seeking an extension for the same time periods as requested by the Consumer Advocates.3 2. Under Section 1.46(a) of the Commission's rules,4it is the policy of the Commission that extensions of time shall not be routinely granted. We do not find that the circumstances presented here warrant granting an extension. 3. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 5(c) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. ��154(i), 154(j), 155(c), section 1.46
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1415A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1415A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1415A1.txt
  • also SCAN, Comment in Support of the Motion for Extension of Time, WC Docket No. 11-59 (filed Aug. 9, 2011). Level 3, Opposition to Motion for Extension of Time, WC Docket No. 11-59 (filed Aug. 11, 2011) (stating that parties have already had 102 days to file comments and an additional 45 days to file replies). See 47 C.F.R. � 1.46(a). (...continued from previous page) (continued....) Federal Communications Commission DA 11-1415 Federal Communications Commission DA 11-1415 $ $ F v v , 2
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1454A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1454A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1454A1.txt
  • HHs in State Segment Measured by Nielsen Full-Power Stations Only All Full- and Low-Power Stations DISH Network DIRECTV SIOUX CITY 149 IA 110,500 70.70% 9 5.01 5.86 5 7 NE 39,800 25.46% 6 1.47 2.88 1 1 SD 6,000 3.84% 3 4.81 4.81 0 0 SIOUX FALLS(MITCHELL) 112 IA 6,800 2.56% 2 5.01 6.51 0 0 MN 21,300 8.01% 2 1.46 1.72 1 1 NE 2,300 0.86% 1 1.64 1.65 0 6 SD 235,500 88.57% 25 5.68 7.32 6 0 SOUTH BEND-ELKHART 93 IN 255,500 75.30% 10 8.67 13.76 8 6 MI 83,800 24.70% 0 4.76 5.71 0 0 SPOKANE 75 ID 127,200 29.30% 4 1.03 6.01 2 2 MT 8,100 1.87% 0 0.03 1.41 0 0 OR 3,000 0.69% 0
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1471A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1471A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1471A1.txt
  • On August 26, 2011, the Rural Telecommunications Group and RCA - The Competitive Carriers Association filed motions for a nine-day extension of time to file reply comments. These parties seek an extension of time for filing reply comments due to the volume of comments received in the record combined with the complexity and significance of the issues addressed. Under Section 1.46(a) of the Commission's rules, it is the policy of the Commission that extensions of time shall not be routinely granted. We recognize that the comment schedule established by the Public Notice provided seven days within which to digest and respond to comments and that a substantial record was received. In addition, we note that Hurricane Irene has had a substantial
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1566A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1566A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1566A1.txt
  • in the BTA, and Clearwire can continue operating pursuant to the old band plan until the transition is completed. Thus, we grant Clearwire an additional extension of time to transition the Bellingham, Washington BTA until March 15, 2012. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to Section 4(i) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. � 154(i), and Sections 1.46 and 27.1232(b)(1)(vi) of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.46, 27.1232(b)(1)(vi) that the Request for Extension of Time filed by Fixed Wireless Holdings, LLC on September 1, 2011 IS GRANTED, and the time for completing the transition in the Bellingham, Washington Basic Trading Area (BTA 36) IS EXTENDED TO March 15, 2012. This action is taken under delegated authority pursuant
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1566A1_Rcd.pdf
  • in the BTA, and Clearwire can continue operating pursuant to the old band plan until the transition is completed. Thus, we grant Clearwire an additional extension of time to transition the Bellingham, Washington BTA until March 15, 2012. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to Section 4(i) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. � 154(i), and Sections 1.46 and 27.1232(b)(1)(vi) of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.46, 27.1232(b)(1)(vi) that the Request for Extension of Time filed by Fixed Wireless Holdings, LLC on September 1, 2011 IS GRANTED, and the time for completing the transition in the Bellingham, Washington Basic Trading Area (BTA 36) IS EXTENDED TO March 15, 2012. This action is taken under delegated authority pursuant
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1650A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1650A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1650A1.txt
  • that the Commission condition renewal of the licenses, allowing operations in the 28.35-29.1 and 29.25-29.5 GHz band only if the other licensed frequencies are unavailable for use, and then only subject to successful completion of coordination with FSS earth station licensees. One opposition was filed in response to the comments filed by Hughes and DIRECTV. Discussion Late Filed Comments. Section 1.46(a) of the Commission rules states that motions for extension of time are not to be routinely granted. In this instance, comments on the renewal applications were due 30 days after the applications were placed on public notice. Hughes and DIRECTV submitted comments on a number of the applications, together with a motion for leave to file late-filed comments, on August
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1650A1_Rcd.pdf
  • License Sub, Inc. for Renewal of License Call Sign WMP367, File No. 0004587843 (filed Mar. 9, 2011) (ACS WirelessOpposition). Hughes and DIRECTV filed a reply. Reply of Hughes Network Systems, LLC and DIRECTV Enterprises, LLC to Opposition of ACS Wireless License Sub, Inc. (filed Mar. 21, 2011). 13515 Federal Communications Commission DA 11-1650 III. DISCUSSION 7. Late Filed Comments. Section 1.46(a) of the Commission rules states that motions for extension of time are not to be routinely granted.21In this instance, comments on the renewal applications were due 30 days after the applications were placed on public notice.22Hughes and DIRECTV submitted comments on a number of the applications, together with a motion for leave to file late-filed comments, on August 4, 2010,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1655A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1655A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1655A1.txt
  • of the period for all judicial review, on pending judicial challenges to the Commission's modified newspaper/broadcast cross-ownership rule. As a result, the new deadline for these filings is January 13, 2012. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, that pursuant to authority under Sections 4(i) and 303(r) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 154 and 303(r), and Section 1.46 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.46, and pursuant to authority delegated to the Media Bureau pursuant to Sections 0.204 and 0.283 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.204, 0.283, an extension of time as described above IS GRANTED, sua sponte, until January 13, 2012. This Order does not constitute action on the Media Parties' request to further
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1725A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1725A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1725A1.txt
  • there would be favorable action on any request for extension of time to demonstrate substantial service from licensees in these markets. Such requests would be considered pursuant to the standards contained in Section 1.946(e) of the Commission's Rules. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to Section 4(i) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. � 154(i), and Sections 1.46 and 27.1232(b)(1)(vi) of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.46, 27.1232(b)(1)(vi) that the Request for Extension of Time filed by Clearwire Spectrum Holdings II, LLC and WPSWP LLC on October 4, 2011 to complete the transition in the Miami-Fort Lauderdale, FL and West Palm Beach-Boca Raton, FL BTAs IS GRANTED, and the time for completing the transition in those BTAs
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1725A1_Rcd.pdf
  • 1, 2011. See 47 C.F.R. � 27.14(o). Our records indicate that all BRS licensees in the Miami-Fort Lauderdale, FL and West Palm Beach-Boca Raton, FL BTAs filed substantial service showings. 14See47 C.F.R. � 1.946(e). 14382 Nadja S. Sodos-Wallace Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to Section 4(i) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. � 154(i), and Sections 1.46 and 27.1232(b)(1)(vi) of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.46, 27.1232(b)(1)(vi) that the Request for Extension of Time filed by Clearwire Spectrum Holdings II, LLC and WPSWP LLC on October 4, 2011 to complete the transition in the Miami-Fort Lauderdale, FL and West Palm Beach-Boca Raton, FL BTAs IS GRANTED, and the time for completing the transition in those BTAs
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1732A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1732A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1732A1.txt
  • Petition, we conclude that no substantial and material question of fact has been raised concerning the character qualifications of Rockne, Albion, or Krisar. We therefore deny the petition and direct processing of the lease applications. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to Sections 4(i) and 309 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. ��154(i), 309, and Sections 1.41, 1.46, and 1.939 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.41, 1.46, 1.939, that the Motion for Extension of Time Within Which to File Petition to Deny filed by the Benton Foundation on July 7, 2010 IS GRANTED to the extent that the pleading filed by the Benton Foundation on July 21, 2010 will be considered an informal objection and is
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1732A1_Rcd.pdf
  • identified Mr. Bott as the real-party-in-interest. We conclude, however, that there is no evidence of misrepresentation or lack of candor that would call Krisar's character qualifications into question.The sine qua non of misrepresentation or lack of candor is intent to � � 21SeeBenton Petition at 3-5. 22We also note that the Extension Motion did not comply with 47 C.F.R. � 1.46(b), which requires that such motions be filed at least seven days before the filing date, and 47 C.F.R. � 1.46(c), which requires that if a motion for extension of time is filed fewer than 7 days before the filing date, the parties and Commission staff must be orally notified that the motion is being filed. 23SeeVerdeSystems, LLC and Environmentel, LLC,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1766A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1766A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1766A1.txt
  • deadline of October 28, 2011. On October 19, 2011, the National Association of Broadcasters (``NAB'') requested that the reply comment deadline be extended by one week, due to the volume of substantive material filed in the initial comments and the groundbreaking nature of the issues considered in the proceeding. We grant NAB's request in part. As set forth in Section 1.46(a) of the Commission's Rules, the Commission's policy is that extensions of time shall not be routinely granted. Given the importance of the issues in this proceeding and in the interest of encouraging thoughtful consideration of these issues, however, we believe that granting in part NAB's request is necessary to facilitate the development of a full record. Due to the Commission's
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1860A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1860A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1860A1.txt
  • conclude that granting a 14-day extension of time to December 5, 2011 to file reply comments serves the public interest and extend the reply comment deadline to Monday, December 5, 2011. 4. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to Sections 4(i) and 4(j) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 154(i), (j), and Sections 0.141, 0.361, and 1.46 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.141, 0.361, 1.46, that the Motion for Extension of Time to File Reply Comments filed by the National Association of State Utility Consumer Advocates IS GRANTED to the extent indicated herein and IS OTHERWISE DENIED, and the deadline for filing reply comments in response to the Cramming NPRM IS EXTENDED to December 5,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-2025A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-2025A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-2025A1.txt
  • extend the reply comment deadline by two weeks, until January 11, 2012. They claim that the comments filed in response to the NPRM reflect divergent views and opposing arguments on virtually every issue and note further that the current reply comment deadline falls in the middle of the holiday season. We grant the requested extension. As set forth in Section 1.46 of the Commission's rules, the Commission's policy is that extensions of time for filing comments in rulemaking proceedings shall not be routinely granted. In this case, however, an extension of the reply comment period is warranted to enable commenters to adequately review and respond to the comments filed in response to the NPRM. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-2049A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-2049A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-2049A1.txt
  • Reply Comment Deadline, PS Docket No. 11-153, PS Docket No. 10-255 (filed Dec. 14, 2011) (Joint Request). . See ATIS, ATIS Interim Non-Voice Emergency Services Report and Recommendations 8 (Dec. 12, 2011). Id. 4G Americas Request for Extension of Reply Comment Deadline, PS Docket No. 11-153, PS Docket No. 10-255 (filed Dec. 14, 2011). Id. at 1. 47 C.F.R. � 1.46(a). See, e.g., In the Matter of Wireless E911 Location Accuracy Requirements. PS Docket No. 07-114, WC Docket 05-196, Order, 25 FCC Rcd 16879, 16880 �� 3-5 (PSHSB 2010) (granting 14-day extension to permit various Communications Security, Reliability, and Interoperability Council (CSRIC) working groups to develop and finalize recommendations relating to E911 and NG911); Wireless Telecommunications Bureau Grants Extension of Time
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-2089A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-2089A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-2089A1.txt
  • by 21 days to January 27, 2012, on the grounds that preparation of NAB's reply comments to the initial comments by the original January 6 due date would be difficult, particularly with the two federal holidays that fell between the initial and reply comment due dates. We grant NAB's request in part. The Commission's policy, as set forth in Section 1.46(a) of the Commission's Rules, is that extensions of time shall not be routinely granted. Given the importance of the issues in this proceeding and in the interest of encouraging thoughtful consideration of these issues, however, we believe that a partial grant of NAB's request will facilitate the development of a full record. While an extension is warranted here, we find
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-466A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-466A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-466A1.txt
  • Extension of Time, filed by the Village of Wheeling and the City of Park Ridge; Letter from Gerald E. Dempsey, Esq., Klein, Thorpe and Jenkins, Ltd., to Steven A. Broeckaert, Senior Deputy Chief, Policy Division, Media Bureau; Motion for Extension of Time, filed by the Village of Glenview. Consent Motions for Extension of Time, filed by Comcast. 47 C.F.R. � 1.46(a). 47 C.F.R. � 76.7(b)(1), (c)(3). 47 C.F.R. � 76.906. See 47 U.S.C. � 543(l)(1); 47 C.F.R. � 76.905(b). See 47 C.F.R. �� 76.906-.907(b). 47 U.S.C. � 543(l)(1)(B); see also 47 C.F.R. � 76.905(b)(2). 47 C.F.R. � 76.905(b)(2)(i). See Petition at 3. Mediacom Illinois LLC, 21 FCC Rcd 1175, 1176, � 3 (2006). See 47 C.F.R. � 76.905(g). See also Petition
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-496A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-496A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-496A1.txt
  • Jackson TX0279 21.83% 9588 2093 Liberty TX0087 38.46% 2860 1100 Pasadena TX0252 15.32% 48204 7384 Seabrook TX0515 20.15% 4094 825 *CPR = Percent of competitive DBS penetration rate. See 47 U.S.C. � 543(l)(1)(B). 47 C.F.R. � 76.905(b)(2). Comcast Cable Commun., LLC, 22 FCC Rcd 16974 (2007). Motion to Withdraw Texas City, Texas from Petition for Special Relief. 47 C.F.R. � 1.46(a). 47 C.F.R. � 76.906. See 47 U.S.C. � 543(l)(1); 47 C.F.R. � 76.905(b). See 47 C.F.R. �� 76.906 & -.907(b). 47 U.S.C. � 543(l)(1)(B); see also 47 C.F.R. � 76.905(b)(2). 47 C.F.R. � 76.905(b)(2)(i). See Petition at 3. Mediacom Illinois LLC, 21 FCC Rcd 1175, 1176, � 3 (2006). See 47 C.F.R. � 76.905(g). See also Petition at 4. See
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-510A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-510A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-510A1.txt
  • in the BTA, and Clearwire can continue operating pursuant to the old band plan until the transition is completed. Thus, we grant Clearwire an additional extension of time to transition the Bellingham, Washington BTA until September 15, 2011. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to Section 4(i) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. � 154(i), and Sections 1.46 and 27.1232(b)(1)(vi) of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.46, 27.1232(b)(1)(vi) that the Request for Extension of Time filed by Fixed Wireless Holdings, LLC on February 22, 2011 IS GRANTED, and the time for completing the transition in the Bellingham, Washington Basic Trading Area (BTA 36) IS EXTENDED TO September 15, 2011. This action is taken under delegated authority pursuant
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-510A1_Rcd.pdf
  • licensees in the BTA, and Clearwirecan continue operating pursuant to the old band plan until the transition is completed. Thus, we grant Clearwire an additional extension of time to transition the Bellingham, Washington BTA until September 15, 2011. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to Section 4(i) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. � 154(i), and Sections 1.46 and 27.1232(b)(1)(vi) of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.46, 27.1232(b)(1)(vi) that the Request for Extension of Time filed by Fixed Wireless Holdings, LLC on February 22, 2011 IS GRANTED, and the time for completing the transition in the Bellingham, Washington Basic Trading Area (BTA 36) IS EXTENDED TO September 15, 2011. This action is taken under delegated authority pursuant
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-511A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-511A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-511A1.txt
  • of the requests were served on the affected licensees, and no oppositions were filed. Thus, we grant Clearwire an extension of time to transition the San Juan, Puerto Rico and Mayag�ez/Aguadilla-Ponce, Puerto Rico BTAs until April 1, 2011. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to Section 4(i) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. � 154(i), and Sections 1.46 and 27.1232(b)(1)(vi) of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.46, 27.1232(b)(1)(vi) that the Request for Extension of Time filed by NSAC, LLC on February 22, 2011 for the San Juan, Puerto Rico and Mayag�ez/Aguadilla-Ponce, Puerto Rico BTAs IS GRANTED, and the time for completing the transition in those BTAs IS EXTENDED TO April 1, 2011. This action is taken under
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-511A1_Rcd.pdf
  • the requests were served on the affected licensees, and no oppositions were filed. Thus, we grant Clearwire an extension of time to transition the San Juan, Puerto Rico and Mayag�ez/Aguadilla- Ponce, Puerto Rico BTAs until April 1, 2011. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to Section 4(i) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. � 154(i), and Sections 1.46 and 27.1232(b)(1)(vi) of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.46, 27.1232(b)(1)(vi) that the Request for Extension of Time filed by NSAC, LLC on February 22, 2011 for the San Juan, Puerto Rico and Mayag�ez/Aguadilla-Ponce, Puerto Rico BTAs IS GRANTED, and the time for completing the transition in those BTAs IS EXTENDED TO April 1, 2011. This action is taken under
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-512A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-512A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-512A1.txt
  • the issuance of a final court order on pending judicial challenges to the Commission's modified newspaper/broadcast cross-ownership rule. As a result, the new deadline for these filings is, July 5, 2011. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, that pursuant to authority under Sections 4(i) and 303(r) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 154 and 303(r), and Section 1.46 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.46, and pursuant to authority delegated to the Media Bureau pursuant to Sections 0.204 and 0.283 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.204, 0.283, an extension of time as described above IS GRANTED, sua sponte, until, July 5, 2011. This Order does not constitute action on the Media Parties' request to further
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-538A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-538A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-538A1.txt
  • comment deadline of May 17, 2011. On March 21, 2011, the National Association of Broadcasters (``NAB'') requested that the deadlines be extended by 10 days, due to a coinciding comment deadline in another television-related proceeding, and the loss of comment preparation time for many potential commenters attending the 2011 NAB Show. We grant NAB's request. As set forth in Section 1.46(a) of the Commission's Rules, the Commission's policy is that extensions of time shall not be routinely granted. Given the importance of the issues in this proceeding and in the interest of encouraging public dialogue regarding these issues, however, we believe that granting NAB's request is necessary to facilitate the development of a full record. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-538A2.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-538A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-538A2.txt
  • comment deadline of May 17, 2011. On March 21, 2011, the National Association of Broadcasters (``NAB'') requested that the deadlines be extended by 10 days, due to a coinciding comment deadline in another television-related proceeding, and the loss of comment preparation time for many potential commenters attending the 2011 NAB Show. We grant NAB's request. As set forth in Section 1.46(a) of the Commission's Rules, the Commission's policy is that extensions of time shall not be routinely granted. Given the importance of the issues in this proceeding and in the interest of encouraging public dialogue regarding these issues, however, we believe that granting NAB's request is necessary to facilitate the development of a full record. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-539A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-539A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-539A1.txt
  • original data submitted. TABLE 3 - WLS-TV VIEWING IN RACINE, WI (INDIVIDUAL SWEEP PERIOD RESULTS) Survey Households Share Standard Net Standard Year Studied Viewing Error Weekly Error Hours Circulation Nov. 2005 1 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Feb. 2006 8 2.81 2.13 11.66 11.93 May 2006 6 0.50 0.56 12.43 14.02 Nov. 2006 4 3.21 2.01 33.33 0.00 Feb. 2007 5 1.46 1.37 25.00 0.00 May 2007 7 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 WISN-TV states that this data demonstrates that, except for November 2006, WLS-TV failed to reach the required minimum threshold of 3 percent total weekly viewing hours and 25 percent net weekly circulation. WISN-TV argues that although there is some variation in the share and cume results among the six periods,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-559A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-559A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-559A1.txt
  • Holdings GB LLC, Environmentel LLC, Verde Systems LLC, Intelligent Transportation & Monitoring Wireless LLC, V2G LLC, and Warren Havens, Request to Reissue Public Notice and Place in Existing Relevant Docket and Request to Extend Deadlines for Comments and Reply Comments (filed March 25, 2011). Request at 2. Opposition of Progeny LMS, LLC (filed March 25, 2011) (``Opposition''). 47 C.F.R. � 1.46. We note that Petitioners indicated that they will file their comments by the comment filing deadline if the Request is not granted today. See Request at 1. We note that the Request raises other issues. See Request at 2, 3. We do not need to address these issues in this Public Notice. PUBLIC NOTICE Federal Communications Commission 445 12th St.,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-559A1_Rcd.pdf
  • deadline for filing reply comments until April 11, 2011.7 For further information, please contact Brenda Boykin, Spectrum & Competition Policy Division, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau, at (202) 418-2062, Brenda.Boykin@fcc.gov, or Bill Stafford, Spectrum & Competition Policy Division, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau, at (202) 418-0563, Bill.Stafford@fcc.gov. Action by the Chief, Spectrum & Competition Policy Division, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau. -FCC - 547 C.F.R. � 1.46. 6We note that Petitioners indicated that they will file their comments by the comment filing deadline if the Request is not granted today. See Request at 1. 7We note that the Request raises other issues. See Request at 2, 3. We do not need to address these issues in this Public Notice. 4113
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-595A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-595A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-595A1.txt
  • public interest by allowing parties to discuss the complex issues at stake and develop consensus approaches where possible. Accordingly, we are extending the deadline for all comments and reply comments to April 25, and May 23, 2011, respectively. IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to section 4(i) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. � 154(i), and section 1.46 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.46, the joint request of the American Foundation for the Blind, Consumer Electronics Association, Information Technology Industry Council, and Telecommunications Industry Association, filed on April 1, 2011, is GRANTED TO THE EXTENT DESCRIBED HEREIN, and the deadline for filing comments in response to the Notice of Proposed Rulemaking is EXTENDED to April 25,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-595A1_Rcd.pdf
  • public interest by allowing parties to discuss the complex issues at stake and develop consensus approaches where possible. Accordingly, we are extending the deadline for all comments and reply comments to April 25, and May 23, 2011, respectively. 5. ITIS ORDERED that, pursuant to section 4(i) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. � 154(i), and section 1.46 of the Commission'srules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.46, the joint request of the American Foundation for the Blind, Consumer Electronics Association, Information Technology Industry Council, and Telecommunications Industry Association, filed on April 1, 2011, is GRANTED TO THE EXTENT DESCRIBED HEREIN, and the deadline for filing comments in response to the Notice of Proposed Rulemakingis EXTENDED to April 25, 2011, and
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-613A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-613A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-613A1.txt
  • of Distributed Antenna System (DAS) in the Public Rights of Way in Connecticut - CPCN Requirement,'' Draft Decision, Docket No. 08-06-19RE01, Jan. 26, 2011 (indicating that the Connecticut PUC will reconsider its decision and will not require wireless service providers to obtain a CPCN to access public rights of way). Apr. 1st Extension Request at 1. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.46(a). PUBLIC NOTICE Federal Communications Commission 445 12th St., S.W. Washington, D.C. 20554 News Media Information 202 / 418-0500 Internet: http://www.fcc.gov TTY: 1-888-835-5322 � � � � � j � � ��PNG r v ��"r�9 I'6� �d�Y�͆aX ���; Wh� �X,�aX���y�]\\.W`h���va6l! �v"]�V�at�������-``````�"m(c)x<��G�<���={-N��J%t�<== �"""x ҍ� � ��(c)���!��'' �R)&� �A�� "���\��v`` � 6� �� F � � � � � � F P
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-613A1_Rcd.pdf
  • into the Deploymentof Distributed Antenna System (DAS) in the Public Rights of Way in Connecticut �CPCN Requirement," Draft Decision, Docket No. 08-06-19RE01, Jan. 26, 2011 (indicating that the Connecticut PUC will reconsider its decision and will not require wireless service providers to obtain a CPCN to access public rights of way). 7Apr. 1stExtension Request at 1. 8See 47 C.F.R. � 1.46(a). 5094 receiving U.S. Postal Service mail). All filings must be addressed to the Commission's Secretary, Office of the Secretary, Federal Communications Commission. �All hand-delivered or messenger-delivered paper filings for the Commission's Secretary must be delivered to FCC Headquarters at 445 12thSt., SW, Room TW-A325, Washington, DC 20554. The filing hours are 8:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m. All hand deliveries must
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-664A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-664A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-664A1.txt
  • the Third Report and Order and Fourth Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking. On April 8, 2011, the City of Charlotte, North Carolina (``Charlotte''), submitted an opposition to the Motion (``Opposition''). Charlotte urges the Commission to deny the Motion, arguing that the Motion is untimely, procedurally defective, and otherwise fails to establish a substantive basis for the requested extension. Under Section 1.46(a) of the Commission's rules, it is the policy of the Commission that extensions of time shall not be routinely granted. We do not find that the circumstances presented here warrant granting an extension. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, that the motion for extension filed by the Joint Filers is DENIED. This action is taken under delegated authority pursuant to Sections 0.191
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-681A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-681A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-681A1.txt
  • 488-5300, facsimile (202) 488-5563, TTY (202) 488-5562, e-mail fcc@bcpiweb.com. . For further information, contact Taft Snowdon at (202) 418-2742. For press inquiries, contact Janice Wise at (202) 418-8165. By: Chief, Media Bureau 47 U.S.C. � 310(d). 47 C.F.R. � 1.1200(a). See id. � 1.1206. Id. � 1.1206(b)(2). Id. Id. � 1.1206(b)(1). Id. � 1.1206(b)(2). Id. � 1.45(c). See id. �� 1.46(a) and 73.3584(e). PUBLIC NOTICE Federal Communications Commission 445 12th St., S.W. Washington, D.C. 20554 News Media Information 202 / 418-0500 Internet: http://www.fcc.gov TTY: 1-888-835-5322 � ��PNG r v ��"r�9 I'6� �d�Y�͆aX ���; Wh� �X,�aX���y�]\\.W`h���va6l! �v"]�V�at�������-``````�"m(c)x<��G�<���={-N��J%t�<== �"""x ҍ� � ��(c)���!��'' �R)&� �A�� "���\��v`` � 6� �� @ � �
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-686A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-686A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-686A1.txt
  • counsel, and other interested parties, attended the NAB Show. In addition, FCC staff and Commissioners also attended the NAB Show and made public presentations regarding incentive auctions, among other matters related to this proceeding. The requestors assert that they need the opportunity to address in their reply comments matters that they learned from these presentations. As set forth in Section 1.46(a) of the Commission's Rules, the Commission's policy is that extensions of time shall not be routinely granted. Given the importance of the issues in this proceeding, however, we find that good cause exists to provide all parties an extension of the reply comment deadline to facilitate the development of a full and complete record. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-707A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-707A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-707A1.txt
  • Wireline Competition Bureau: On April 13, 2011, three business days before comments were due in the above captioned matter, COMPTEL filed a motion for extension of time (``Motion''). COMPTEL seeks an extension of seven days for filing comments, asserting that such an extension is warranted because of the scope of the issues raised in the above captioned proceeding. Under Section 1.46(a) of the Commission's rules, it is the policy of the Commission that extensions of time shall not be routinely granted. We do not find that the circumstances presented here warrant granting an extension. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 5(c) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 154(i), 154(j), 155(c), section
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-873A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-873A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-873A1.txt
  • by the Colville Tribes serves the public interest. We therefore extend the comment deadline to Monday, June 20, 2011, and the reply comment deadline to Thursday, August 4, 2011. 4. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to Sections 4(i) and 4(j) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 154(i) and (j), and Sections 0.141, 0.361, and 1.46 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.141, 0.361, and 1.46, the Request for Extension of Time filed by the Confederated Tribes of the Colville Reservation IS GRANTED, and the deadlines for filing comments and reply comments in response to the Native Nations NOI ARE EXTENDED to June 20, 2011 and August 4, 2011, respectively. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Joel G.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-92A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-92A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-92A1.txt
  • there would be favorable action on any request for extension of time to demonstrate substantial service from licensees in these markets. Such requests would be considered pursuant to the standards contained in Section 1.946(e) of the Commission's Rules. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to Section 4(i) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. � 154(i), and Sections 1.46 and 27.1232(b)(1)(vi) of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.46, 27.1232(b)(1)(vi) that the Request for Extension of Time filed by Clearwire Spectrum Holdings II, LLC and WPSWP LLC on December 9, 2010 to complete the transition in the Miami-Fort Lauderdale, FL and West Palm Beach-Boca Raton, FL BTAs IS GRANTED, and the time for completing the transition in those BTAs
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-92A1_Rcd.pdf
  • Wireless Telecommunications Bureau to Nadja Sodos-Wallace, Regulatory Counsel, Assistant Secretary, Clearwire Corporation, 25 FCC Rcd 9195 (WTB BD 2010). 7Extension Request at 2. 8Id. 9Id. 10Id. 11See47 C.F.R. � 27.14(o). 12See47 C.F.R. � 1.946(e). 367 Nadja S. Sodos-Wallace Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to Section 4(i) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. � 154(i), and Sections 1.46 and 27.1232(b)(1)(vi) of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.46, 27.1232(b)(1)(vi) that the Request for Extension of Time filed by Clearwire Spectrum Holdings II, LLC and WPSWP LLC on December 9, 2010 to complete the transition in the Miami-Fort Lauderdale, FL and West Palm Beach-Boca Raton, FL BTAs IS GRANTED, and the time for completing the transition in those BTAs
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-947A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-947A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-947A1.txt
  • Chief, Policy Division, Media Bureau (``Pastue Letter''). The Pastue Letter cannot be considered a formal opposition because it was filed two weeks late, was not accompanied by a motion showing good cause for the lateness, was not served on Petitioner, did not contain ``a detailed full showing, supported by affidavit, of any facts or considerations relied on. 47 C.F.R. �� 1.46, 76.7(b)(1). We will consider the points made in the Pastue Letter as informal comments. Letter from Craig A. Gilley, Esq., Edwards Angell Palmer & Dodge LLP, counsel for Petitioner, to Marlene H. Dortch, Commission Secretary. 47 C.F.R. � 76.906. See 47 U.S.C. � 543(l); 47 C.F.R. � 76.905. See 47 C.F.R. �� 76.906-.907(b). See 47 U.S.C. � 543(l)(1)(D). See Implementation
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-948A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-948A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-948A1.txt
  • City of Montgomery, Ohio (``Montgomery Opposition''); Opposition Comments of the Community Programming Board of the City of Forest Park, Ohio, and Springfield Township, Ohio (``Board Opposition''). The City and the Board moved for an 8 day extension of the deadline for filing their Oppositions, to which Time Warner consented. Although extensions of time are not routinely granted, 47 C.F.R. � 1.46(a), we find good cause for a brief extension here, namely that it enabled the City and the Board to make a more detailed contribution to these proceedings than they could have otherwise. Accordingly, we grant their motion. Time Warner filed two pleadings, each titled simply ``Reply,'' one addressed to the Montgomery Opposition (``Reply to Montgomery'') and the other addressed to
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-952A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-952A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-952A1.txt
  • Deutsche Telekom AG For Consent To Assign or Transfer Control of Licenses and Authorizations ) ) ) WT Docket No. 11-65 ) ) ) ) ORDER Adopted: May 25, 2011 Released: May 25, 2011 By the Chief, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau: On May 20, 2011, The Greenlining Institute (``Greenlining'') filed a motion for extension of time pursuant to 47 C.F.R. � 1.46 requesting a 30-day extension from May 31, 2011 to June 30, 2011 for filing Petitions to Deny in the above captioned proceeding. We deny this request. Greenlining states that it did not receive an unredacted copy of the Application until May 18, 2011, and without the unredacted copy of the Application, Greenlining cannot fully develop the factual information necessary to
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-952A1_Rcd.pdf
  • Matter of Applications of AT&T Inc. and Deutsche Telekom AG For Consent To Assign or Transfer Control of Licenses and Authorizations ))) WT Docket No. 11-65 )))) ORDER Adopted: May 25, 2011 Released: May 25, 2011 By the Chief, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau: 1.On May 20, 2011, The Greenlining Institute ("Greenlining") filed a motion for extension of time1pursuant to 47 C.F.R. �1.46 requesting a 30-day extension from May 31, 20112to June 30, 2011 for filing Petitions to Deny in the above captioned proceeding. We denythis request. 2.Greenlining states that it did not receive an unredacted copy of the Applicationuntil May 18, 2011, and without the unredacted copy of the Application, Greenlining cannot fully develop the factual information necessary to frame a truthful
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-236A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-236A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-236A1.txt
  • Comment Public Notice at para. 19. Id. See also USF/ICC Transformation Order at para. 342. Rural Telecommunications Group, Inc., Motion for Extension of Time, filed February 13, 2012 (``RTG Motion''). Blooston Rural Carriers, Motion for Extension of Time and Separate Comment Cycle, filed February 13, 2012 (``Blooston Motion''). RTG Motion at 2-3. Blooston Motion at 1. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.46(a). (continued....) Federal Communications Commission DA 12-236 PUBLIC NOTICE Federal Communications Commission 445 12th St., S.W. Washington, D.C. 20554 News Media Information 202 / 418-0500 Internet: http://www.fcc.gov TTY: 1-888-835-5322 � � � ��PNG r v ��"r�9 I'6� �d�Y�͆aX ���; Wh� �X,�aX���y�]\\.W`h���va6l! �v"]�V�at�������-``````�"m(c)x<��G�<���={-N��J%t�<== �"""x ҍ� � ��(c)���!��'' �R)&� �A�� "���\��v`` � 6� �� c � � � � � ������������������������������������������������������������������������ ������������������������������������������������������������������������ ������������������������������������������������������
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-236A1_Rcd.pdf
  • further information regarding this proceeding and auction process questions, contact Lisa Stover, Auctions and SpectrumAccess Division, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau, at (717) 338- 2868. For further information on Mobility Fund Phase I questions, contact Sayuri Rajapakse, Auctions and Spectrum Access Division, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau, at (202) 418-0660. -FCC - 11RTG Motion at 2-3. 12Blooston Motion at 1. 13See 47 C.F.R. � 1.46(a). 1684
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-23A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-23A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-23A1.txt
  • PIPAC argues, in the alternative, that if the Commission extends the deadlines in this proceeding, it should limit any extension to the reply portion of the comment cycle and grant only a seven day extension of the current reply comment deadline. We grant the Named State Broadcasters and RTDNA's requests in part. The Commission's policy, as set forth in Section 1.46(a) of the Commission's Rules, is that extensions of time shall not be routinely granted. Given the importance of the issues in this proceeding and in the interest of encouraging thoughtful consideration of these issues, however, we believe that a partial grant of the requests by the Named State Broadcasters and RTDNA will facilitate the development of a full record. We
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-263A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-263A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-263A1.txt
  • and complexity of the issues in this proceeding, however, we are extending the deadline for all comments and reply comments to March 9, and March 30, 2012, respectively. Further extensions of these deadlines are unlikely to be granted. IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to section 4(i) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. � 154(i), and Section 1.46 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.46, the motion for extension of time of the Telecommunications for the Deaf and Hard of Hearing, Inc., National Association of the Deaf, Association of Late-Deafened Adults, Inc., Deaf and Hard of Hearing Consumer Advocacy Network, and California Coalition of Agencies Serving Deaf and Hard of Hearing, Inc., filed on February 13, 2012,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-26A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-26A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-26A1.txt
  • February 8, 2012. NARUC argues that additional time is necessary in light of the holidays, the required State comment clearance procedures, and competing priorities. In addition, NARUC states that granting the extension will allow its members to consider and submit a policy resolution on some of the issues raised in this proceeding. The Commission's policy, as set forth in section 1.46(a) of the Commission's Rules, is that extensions of time are not routinely granted. However, given our desire to encourage thoughtful consideration of the important issues raised in this proceeding, we believe that a partial grant of the NARUC request will facilitate that consideration. While an extension is warranted here, we find that the request for an additional 28 days in
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-2A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-2A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-2A1.txt
  • 2007 2.31 2.46 2.51 (98) (73) (59) 2009 1.70 1.76 1.77 (103) (68) (75) Religion Format Market Measure 2005 2.14 1.65 1.30 * (55) (41) (52) 2007 1.53 1.85 1.33 (39) (32) (62) 2009 1.18 1.59 0.88 (34) (36) (57) Contour Measure 2005 1.70 1.55 1.93 (73) (42) (33) 2007 1.19 1.51 1.95 * (53) (40) (40) 2009 0.88 1.22 1.46 * (53) (31) (43) Table 11 (continued) Average Full-Service Commercial FM Stations' Revenue per Adult by Format Year No LPFM One LPFM Two or More LPFM News/Talk/Sports Format Market Measure 2005 3.02 2.35 2.46 (35) (20) (44) 2007 2.83 2.87 2.19 (25) (33) (71) 2009 1.94 1.94 1.66 (38) (46) (83) Contour Measure 2005 2.31 2.80 3.03 (45) (30) (24)
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-320A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-320A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-320A1.txt
  • the public comment received in response to the Public Notice - to modify LightSquared's license, our order of modification would not become final until after LightSquared has been given an additional period of time to protest, pursuant to the requirements of Section 316(a). Opposition to Motion for Extension of Time filed Feb. 24, 2012 at 1 (citing 47 C.F.R. � 1.46(a)). Id at 3. LightSquared states that ``under the Communications Act, public notice periods are routinely a minimum of 30 days where an entity's fundamental license is placed at risk of revocation or modification.'' Extension Motion at 4-5. The 15 day extension granted here ensures that LightSquared will have been given a full 30 day period of time to address the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-320A1_Rcd.pdf
  • for Extension of Time IS GRANTED IN PART, and the time for filing comments in response to the Public NoticeIS EXTENDED to March 16, 2012.7Reply Comments should be filed by March 30, 2012. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mindel De La Torre Chief, International Bureau 5Opposition to Motion for Extension of Time filed Feb. 24, 2012 at 1 (citing 47 C.F.R. � 1.46(a)). 6Id at 3. 7LightSquared states that "under the Communications Act, public notice periods are routinely a minimum of 30 days where an entity's fundamental license is placed at risk of revocation or modification." Extension Motionat 4- 5. The 15 day extension granted here ensures that LightSquared will have been given a full 30 day period of time to address the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-400A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-400A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-400A1.txt
  • request at an earlier date,'' fails to ``identify a credible justification for an extension,'' and fails ``to explain why . . . [it] is an interested party.'' In its reply, SkyTel states the ``the Request should be fully granted, or if not, the Bureaus should grant as much of the requested extension period as possible.'' As set forth under Section 1.46(a) of the Commission's rules, it is the policy of the Commission that extensions of time shall not be routinely granted. We do not find that the arguments presented by SkyTel warrant granting an extension. The general nature of SkyTel's assertion that the Report is lengthy and complicated does not persuade us that an extension should be granted. In addition, SkyTel
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-400A1_Rcd.pdf
  • 11-49 (March 13, 2012). 4Request at 3. 5Id.at 1-4. 2552 Federal Communications Commission DA 12-400 fails "to explain why . . . [it] is an interested party."6In its reply, SkyTel states the "the Request should be fully granted, or if not, the Bureaus should grant as much of the requested extension period as possible."7 3. As set forth under Section 1.46(a) of the Commission's rules, it is the policy of the Commission that extensions of time shall not be routinely granted.8We do not find that the arguments presented by SkyTel warrant granting an extension. The general nature of SkyTel's assertion that the Report is lengthy and complicated does not persuade us that an extension should be granted. In addition, SkyTel waited
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-40A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-40A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-40A1.txt
  • days after a final judgment that (a) is not subject to further judicial review or appeal and (b) disposes of the pending judicial challenges to the Commission's modified newspaper/broadcast cross-ownership rule. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, that pursuant to authority under Sections 4(i) and 303(r) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 154 and 303(r), and Section 1.46 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.46, and pursuant to authority delegated to the Media Bureau pursuant to Sections 0.204 and 0.283 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.204, 0.283, an extension of time as described above IS GRANTED, sua sponte, until 90 days after the Supreme Court's dispositions of all judicial challenges to the Commission's modified newspaper/broadcast
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-451A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-451A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-451A1.txt
  • parties to make informed decisions about filing comments and to provide meaningful responses to the CenturyLink Petition. On March 21, 2012, CenturyLink amended the CenturyLink Petition to request confidential, rather than highly confidential, treatment for certain information included in the petition and attachments. Today, we released a Protective Order in this docket. The Commission's policy, as set forth in section 1.46(a) of the Commission's rules, is that extensions of time are not routinely granted. However, given our desire to encourage thoughtful consideration of the important issues raised in this proceeding, we find that a partial grant of the COMPTEL and NASUCA/NJDRC motions will facilitate that consideration. While an extension is warranted here, we find that the requests for an additional 30
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-467A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-467A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-467A1.txt
  • on April 13, 2012, the Supreme Court is expected to rule on certain pending petitions for a writ of certiorari that may impact the issues to be discussed in the reply comments. According to Citizen Commenters, no party would be prejudiced by this extension. We grant the Citizen Commenters request in part. The Commission's policy, as set forth in Section 1.46(a) of the Commission's Rules, is that extensions of time shall not be routinely granted. Given the importance of the issues in this proceeding and in the interest of encouraging thoughtful consideration of these issues, however, we believe that a partial grant of Citizen Commenters' request will facilitate the development of a full record. While an extension is warranted here, we
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-480A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-480A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-480A1.txt
  • Wireless LLC, V2G LLC, and Warren Havens (collectively ``SkyTel'') for an extension of the dates for comments and replies. On March 15, 2012, SkyTel filed ``Comments on the Progeny Test Report and Request to Extend the Deadline for Replies to Comments.'' On March 20, 2012, Progeny filed an opposition to SkyTel's request for an extension. As set forth under Section 1.46(a) of the Commission's rules, it is the policy of the Commission that extensions of time shall not be routinely granted. On March 14, 2012 - one day before SkyTel submitted its further request for an extension of the reply comments date - we denied SkyTel's previous request for an extension of time to file both comments and reply comments. We
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-480A1_Rcd.pdf
  • Monitoring Wireless LLC, V2G LLC, and Warren Havens (collectively "SkyTel") for an extension of the dates for comments and replies.1On March 15, 2012, SkyTel filed "Comments on the Progeny Test Report and Request to Extend the Deadline for Replies to Comments."2On March 20, 2012, Progeny filed an opposition to SkyTel's request for an extension.3 2. As set forth under Section 1.46(a) of the Commission's rules, it is the policy of the Commission that extensions of time shall not be routinely granted.4On March 14, 2012 �one day before SkyTel submitted its further request for an extension of the reply comments date �we denied SkyTel's previous request for an extension of time to file both comments and reply comments. We find that the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-601A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-601A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-601A1.txt
  • System (DAS) facilities, nor the manner in which they are regulated. Due to the forthcoming change in ownership of NextG's DAS facilities, Crown Castle requests an additional two weeks to review and analyze information regarding the proceeding to ensure that its comments reflect its position on the issues raised in NextG's Petition. The Commission's policy, as set forth in section 1.46(a) of the Commission's rules, is that extensions of time are not routinely granted. However, given our desire to encourage thoughtful consideration of the important issues raised in this proceeding, we believe that a grant of Crown Castle's request will facilitate that consideration. Therefore, we grant to all parties an extension of the current reply comment deadline, which will establish May
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-601A1_Rcd.pdf
  • the Federal Register on February 28, 2012. 77 Fed. Reg. 12,055 (Feb. 28, 2012). 4Request for Extension of Time, Crown Castle Solutions Corp., WT Docket No. 12-37, filed Apr. 10, 2012. No commenters objected to the extension request. 5Request at 1. 4076 Federal Communications Commission DA 12-601 raised in NextG's Petition.6 4. The Commission's policy, as set forth in section 1.46(a) of the Commission's rules,7is that extensions of time are not routinely granted. However, given our desire to encourage thoughtful consideration of the important issues raised in this proceeding, we believe that a grant of Crown Castle's request will facilitate that consideration. Therefore, we grant to all parties an extension of the current reply comment deadline, which will establish May 14,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-634A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-634A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-634A1.txt
  • 13, 2012, the National Association of Broadcasters (``NAB'') requested a 30-day extension of the comment and reply comment deadlines, due to the complex issues raised by the March 30 Public Notice, and because of many concerned parties' attendance at the 2012 NAB Show in Las Vegas, NV in April. We grant NAB's request in part. As set forth in Section 1.46(a) of the Commission's Rules, the Commission's policy is that extensions of time shall not be routinely granted. Given the importance of the issues in this proceeding and in the interest of enabling interested parties to file comments, however, we believe that granting NAB's request in part is necessary to facilitate the development of a full record. Due to a desire
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-73A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-73A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-73A1.txt
  • the requests were served on the affected licensees, and no oppositions were filed. Thus, we grant Clearwire an extension of time to transition the Miami-Fort Lauderdale, FL and West Palm Beach-Boca Raton, FL BTAs until June 15, 2012. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to Section 4(i) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. � 154(i), and Sections 1.46 and 27.1232(b)(1)(vi) of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.46, 27.1232(b)(1)(vi) that the Request for Extension of Time filed by Clearwire Spectrum Holdings II, LLC and WPSWP LLC on December 20, 2011 to complete the transition in the Miami-Fort Lauderdale, FL and West Palm Beach-Boca Raton, FL BTAs IS GRANTED, and the time for completing the transition in those BTAs
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-73A1_Rcd.pdf
  • the requests were served on the affected licensees, and no oppositions were filed. Thus, we grant Clearwire an extension of time to transition the Miami-Fort Lauderdale, FL and West Palm Beach-Boca Raton, FL BTAs until June 15, 2012. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to Section 4(i) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. � 154(i), and Sections 1.46 and 27.1232(b)(1)(vi) of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.46, 27.1232(b)(1)(vi) that the Request for Extension of Time filed by Clearwire Spectrum Holdings II, LLC and WPSWP LLC on December 20, 2011 to complete the transition in theMiami-Fort BD 2011); Letter from John J. Schauble, Deputy Chief, Broadband Division, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau to Nadja Sodos-Wallace,Regulatory Counsel, Assistant Secretary, Clearwire Corporation,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-949A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-949A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-949A1.txt
  • 1 and 2. CBC also suggests therein that a monetary forfeiture (presumably for construction without authority after permit expiration) would be more appropriate than loss of the construction permit. Id. at 8, n.7. See 47 C.F.R. �� 1.4(b)(2) and 1.115(d). The 30th day fell on a Saturday, so the pleading was due the first business day thereafter. Id. at �� 1.46(a) and (c). April Petition, n.1. Id. citing Charles T. Crawford, Order, 17 FCC Rcd 2014 (2002) (``Crawford'') and MTD, Inc., Memorandum Opinion and Order, 6 FCC Rcd 34 (1991) (``MTD''). Although CBC captioned the April Petition as a ``Petition for Waiver and Reinstatement,'' the filing challenges the conclusions reached in the Letter Decision, relies on the same facts raised previously,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-98-1305A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-98-1305A1.txt
  • a response to TMI's opposition. Therefore, we extend the date to file responses to the Opposition to Petitions to Deny TMI's application until June 29, 1998. 4. This action is taken pursuant to the authority found in Sections 4(i) and 303 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. � 154(i) 303; and pursuant to Sections 0.51, 0.261, 1.46 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � � 0.51, 0.261, 1.46. 5. Accordingly, Norcom Networks Corporation's Request for Extension of Time is GRANTED and the deadline for filing responses to TMI Communications and Company, L.P.'s Opposition to Petitions to Deny is EXTENDED from June 25, 1998 to June 29, 1998. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION ^ ''// , ) Thomas S. Tycz
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-99-219A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-99-219A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-99-219A1.txt
  • file a response to PanAmSat's opposition. Therefore, we extend the date to file responses to the Petitions to Deny of TUPR's application until February 4, 1999. 4. This action is taken pursuant to the authority found in Sections 4(i) and 303 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. � 154(i) 303; and pursuant to Sections 0.51, 0.261, 1.46 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � � 0.51, 0.261, 1.46. 5. Accordingly, TUPR's Request for Extension of Time is GRANTED and the deadline for filing responses to PanAmSat's Petitions to Deny is EXTENDED from January 21, 1999 to February 4, 1999. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Thomas S. Tycz Chief, Satellite and Radiocommication Division, International Bureau Federal Communications Commission DA 99-219
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-99-274A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-99-274A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-99-274A1.txt
  • required to be served upon other parties by statute or Commission regulation and the document is in fact served by mail (see � 1.47(f)), and the filing period for a response is 10 days or less, an additional 3 days (excluding holidays) will be allowed to all parties in the proceeding for filing a response." Id. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.46(a). Federal Communications Commission DA 99-274 Federal Communications Commission DA 99-274 � � � �
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-99-701A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-99-701A1.txt
  • to take appropriate enforcement Antelecom Motion at 2. 6 Id. at 2-3. 7 International Settlement Rates, Docket No. 96-261, Petition of AT&T, MCI -WorldCom and Sprint for Enforcement of International Settlements Benchmark Rates for Services with the Netherlands Antilles,, DA 99-479, Opposition of AT&T, MCI WorldCom, and Sprint (filed on April 13, 1999). 8 Id. at 2-3. 9 47C.F.R. � 1.46(a). :0 Benchmarks Order, 12 FCC Red 19806, at �J 185. 6356 Federal Communications Commission DA 99-701 measures" if this requirement is not met." Thus, Antelecom should have been on notice for well over a year, since the adoption of the Benchmarks Order, and has been on notice for almost four months, since the International Bureau sent a letter to the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-99-817A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-99-817A1.txt
  • 1999, to tile comments, would enable Antelecom more fully to address the issues in this proceeding. We therefore find that Antelecom has shown good cause for extending the comment period until May 3, 1999. and therefore grant its motion.6 2. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to Section 4(i) of the Communications Act, as amended, 47 U.S.C. � 4(i), and Section 1.46 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.46, that Antelecom's Motion IS GRANTED. Comments are due May 3. 1999 and reply comments are due May 13. 1999. 3. This order is issued under Section 0.261 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 0.261, and is effective upon adoption. FEDERAL GMVtfc\?fiNS COMMISSION Rebecca Arbogast Chief, Telecommunications Division International Bureau See, 47
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-209149A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-209149A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-209149A1.txt
  • presents various statistics for each of the ten station-groups where j = 1,2,...,10. TABLE A1 core hours preemption n(j) N(j) p(j) fpcf(j) m(j) v(j) sm(j) m(j) v(j) sm(j) ABC 20 186 .154 0.89 3.82 0.281 0.11 9.70 43.972 1.40 CBS 20 184 .153 0.89 3.06 0.023 0.03 7.84 19.882 0.94 NBC 20 188 .156 0.89 3.32 0.274 0.11 12.36 47.712 1.46 FOX 10 163 .135 0.94 4.48 1.013 0.31 0.84 0.811 0.27 UPN 10 80 .066 0.88 5.25 5.107 0.67 0.54 0.510 0.21 WB 10 63 .052 0.84 4.34 1.423 0.35 0.55 0.287 0.16 PAX 10 65 .054 0.85 3.39 0.381 0.18 1.06 3.908 0.58 UNI/TEL 10 38 .032 0.74 3.39 0.659 0.22 2.26 5.526 0.64 Religious 10 41 .034 0.76
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-211380A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-211380A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-211380A1.txt
  • ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ET Docket No. 98-206 RM-9147 RM-9245 ORDER EXTENDING REPLY COMMENT PERIOD -- ERRATUM Adopted: March 26, 2001 Released: March 26, 2001 By the Deputy Chief, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau: 1. On March 21, 2001, DIRECTV, Inc. and EchoStar Satellite Corporation jointly filed a motion, pursuant to Section 1.46 of the Commission's Rules, to extend the period for filing reply comments to the Further Notice of Proposed Rule Making in the above-captioned proceeding from March 26, 2001 to April 26, 2001. In response, Northpoint Technology, Ltd. and Broadwave USA, Inc. filed an Opposition to Motion for Extension of Time on March 23, 2001. For the reasons discussed below, we
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-211601A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-211601A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-211601A1.txt
  • 698-746 MHz spectrum band, currently comprising television ("TV") Channels 52-59. Comments due May 14; replies due June 4. ET 98-206; ORDER 03/23/01 (adopted 03/23/01; FCC 00- 754 Part 2 and PART 25. The Commission extended the Reply comment period to April 9, 2001. On March 21, 2001, DIRECTV, Inc. and EchoStar Satellite Corporation Jointly filed a motion, pursuant to Section 1.46 of the Commission's Rules, to extend the period for filing reply comments to the Further Notice of Proposed Rule Making in the above-captioned proceeding from March 26, 2001 to April 26, 2001. ET 98-206; ORDER 3/26/01 (adopted 3/26/01) Erratm - Part 2 and Part 25. Extended the Reply Comment period from March 26, 2001 to April 5, 2001, DA 01-754,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-211840A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-211840A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-211840A1.txt
  • ("TV") Channels 52-59. Comments due May 14; replies due June 4. ET 98-206; ORDER 3/26/01 (adopted 3/26/01) Erratm - Part 2 and Part 25. Extended the Reply Comment period from March 26, 2001 to April 5, 2001, DA 01-754, released March 23, 2001. On March 21, 2001, DIRECTV, Inc. and EchoStar Satellite Corporation jointly filed a motion, Pursuant to Section 1.46 of the Commission's Rules, to extend the period for filing reply comments to the Further Notice of Proposed Rule Making in the above-captioned proceeding from March 26, 2001 to April 26, 2001. PN 03/29/01; DA 01-788 Pleading Cycle Established for Responses to Petitions for Reconsideration of the Third Report and Order in WT Docket No. 99-168, CS Docket No. 98-120
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-211967A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-211967A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-211967A1.txt
  • ("TV") Channels 52-59. Comments due May 14; replies due June 4. ET 98-206; ORDER 3/26/01 (adopted 3/26/01) Erratm - Part 2 and Part 25. Extended the Reply Comment period from March 26, 2001 to April 5, 2001, DA 01-754, released March 23, 2001. On March 21, 2001, DIRECTV, Inc. and EchoStar Satellite Corporation jointly filed a motion, Pursuant to Section 1.46 of the Commission's Rules, to extend the period for filing reply comments to the Further Notice of Proposed Rule Making in the above-captioned proceeding from March 26, 2001 to April 26, 2001. OFFICE OF MANAGING DIRECTOR MD 01-76; NPRM 03/29/01 (adopted 03/19/01); FCC 01-97 Assessment and Collection of Regulatory Fees for Fiscal Year 2001. Proposed to revise its Schedule of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-212286A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-212286A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-212286A1.txt
  • replies due May 10. Contact: John A. Reed at (202) 418-2455. ET 98-206; ORDER 3/26/01 (adopted 3/26/01) Erratm - Part 2 and Part 25. Extended the Reply Comment period from March 26, 2001 to April 5, 2001, DA 01-754, released March 23, 2001. On March 21, 2001, DIRECTV, Inc., and EchoStar Satellite Corporation jointly filed a motion, Pursuant to Section 1.46 of the Commission's Rules, to extend the period for filing reply comments to the Further Notice of Proposed Rule Making in the above-captioned proceeding from March 26, 2001 to April 26, 2001. GN 01-74; NPRM 03/28/01 (adopted 03/16/01); FCC 01-91 Reallocation and Service Rules for the 698-746 MHz Spectrum Band (Television Channels 52-59). The Commission proposed to reallocate the 698-746
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-214012A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-214012A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-214012A1.txt
  • 75 days after publication in the Federal Register; replies due 105 days after publication in the Federal Register. Contact: Neal L. McNeil at (202) 418-2408 (VOICE), (202) 418-2989 TTY. ET 01-75; ORDER 06/21/01 (adopted 06/20/01); DA 01-1470 Association for Maximum Service Television, Inc. On June 15, 2001, the Association for Maximum Service Television, Inc. filed a motion pursuant to section 1.46 of the Commission's rules, to extend the period for filing comments and reply comments to the Notice of Proposed Rule Making, in the above captioned proceeding. Comments due July 9; replies due August 7. WIRELESS TELECOMMUNICATIONS BUREAU WT 01-97; NPRM 05/07/01(adopted 04/27/01); FCC 01-148 In the Matter of Amendment of Section 90.20(e)(6) of the Commission's Rules to Revise the Authorized
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-214248A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-214248A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-214248A1.txt
  • 75 days after publication in the Federal Register; replies due 105 days after publication in the Federal Register. Contact: Neal L. McNeil at (202) 418-2408 (VOICE), (202) 418-2989 TTY. ET 01-75; ORDER 06/21/01 (adopted 06/20/01); DA 01-1470 Association for Maximum Service Television, Inc. On June 15, 2001, the Association for Maximum Service Television, Inc. filed a motion pursuant to section 1.46 of the Commission's rules, to extend the period for filing comments and reply comments to the Notice of Proposed Rule Making, in the above captioned proceeding. Comments due July 9*; replies due August 7. WIRELESS TELECOMMUNICATIONS BUREAU WT 01-97; NPRM 05/07/01(adopted 04/27/01); FCC 01-148 In the Matter of Amendment of Section 90.20(e)(6) of the Commission's Rules to Revise the Authorized
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-214363A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-214363A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-214363A1.txt
  • 75 days after publication in the Federal Register; replies due 105 days after publication in the Federal Register. Contact: Neal L. McNeil at (202) 418-2408 (VOICE), (202) 418-2989 TTY. ET 01-75; ORDER 06/21/01 (adopted 06/20/01); DA 01-1470 Association for Maximum Service Television, Inc. On June 15, 2001, the Association for Maximum Service Television, Inc. filed a motion pursuant to section 1.46 of the Commission's rules, to extend the period for filing comments and reply comments to the Notice of Proposed Rule Making, in the above captioned proceeding. Comments due July 9*; replies due August 7. WIRELESS TELECOMMUNICATIONS BUREAU WT 01-97; NPRM 05/07/01(adopted 04/27/01); FCC 01-148 In the Matter of Amendment of Section 90.20(e)(6) of the Commission's Rules to Revise the Authorized
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-214737A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-214737A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-214737A1.txt
  • 75 days after publication in the Federal Register; replies due 105 days after publication in the Federal Register. Contact: Neal L. McNeil at (202) 418-2408 (Voice), (202) 418-2989 TTY. ET 01-75; ORDER 06/21/01 (adopted 06/20/01); DA 01-1470 Association for Maximum Service Television, Inc. On June 15, 2001, the Association for Maximum Service Television, Inc. filed a motion pursuant to section 1.46 of the Commission's rules, to extend the period for filing comments and reply comments to the Notice of Proposed Rule Making in the above-captioned proceeding. Comments due July 9*; replies due August 7. WIRELESS TELECOMMUNICATIONS BUREAU WT 01-97; NPRM 05/07/01(adopted 04/27/01); FCC 01-148 In the Matter of Amendment of Section 90.20(e)(6) of the Commission's Rules to Revise the Authorized Duty
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-214889A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-214889A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-214889A1.txt
  • 75 days after publication in the Federal Register; replies due 105 days after publication in the Federal Register. Contact: Neal L. McNeil at (202) 418-2408 (Voice), (202) 418-2989 TTY. ET 01-75; ORDER 06/21/01 (adopted 06/20/01); DA 01-1470 Association for Maximum Service Television, Inc. On June 15, 2001, the Association for Maximum Service Television, Inc. filed a motion pursuant to section 1.46 of the Commission's rules, to extend the period for filing comments and reply comments to the Notice of Proposed Rule Making in the above-captioned proceeding. Comments due July 9*; replies due August 7. WIRELESS TELECOMMUNICATIONS BUREAU WT 01-97; NPRM 05/07/01(adopted 04/27/01); FCC 01-148 In the Matter of Amendment of Section 90.20(e)(6) of the Commission's Rules to Revise the Authorized Duty
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-215113A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-215113A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-215113A1.txt
  • 75 days after publication in the Federal Register; replies due 105 days after publication in the Federal Register. Contact: Neal L. McNeil at (202) 418-2408 (voice), (202) 418-2989 TTY. ET 01-75; ORDER 06/21/01 (adopted 06/20/01); DA 01-1470 Association for Maximum Service Television, Inc. On June 15, 2001, the Association for Maximum Service Television, Inc. filed a motion pursuant to section 1.46 of the Commission's rules, to extend the period for filing comments and reply comments to the Notice of Proposed Rule Making in the above-captioned proceeding. Comments due July 9*; replies due August 7. WIRELESS TELECOMMUNICATIONS BUREAU WT 01-97; NPRM 05/07/01(adopted 04/27/01); FCC 01-148 In the Matter of Amendment of Section 90.20(e)(6) of the Commission's Rules to Revise the Authorized Duty
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-215526A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-215526A1.txt
  • 0.41 38.0 Illinois 7,916 8,920 10,069 10,948 2,105 9,878 11,983 4.46 51.4 Indiana 3,804 4,192 4,536 4,810 1,061 4,037 5,099 1.90 34.0 Iowa 1,888 2,039 2,163 2,268 520 1,921 2,441 0.91 29.3 Kansas 1,829 2,017 2,165 2,304 501 2,086 2,588 0.96 41.5 Kentucky 2,353 2,629 2,861 3,060 711 2,715 3,426 1.28 45.6 Louisiana 2,703 2,946 3,192 3,432 698 3,215 3,913 1.46 44.7 Maine 869 976 996 1,105 243 951 1,195 0.44 37.5 Maryland 3,767 4,234 4,625 4,911 917 4,259 5,176 1.93 37.4 Massachusetts 4,988 5,455 6,010 6,338 1,206 5,355 6,561 2.44 31.5 Michigan 6,444 7,246 7,983 8,523 1,721 7,809 9,530 3.55 47.9 Minnesota 3,064 3,461 3,864 4,115 950 3,667 4,617 1.72 50.7 Mississippi 1,584 1,734 1,877 2,017 395 1,888 2,283 0.85
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-216136A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-216136A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-216136A1.txt
  • Federal Register; replies due 42 days after publication in the Federal Register. IB 96-261; PN 09/06/01; DA 01-2104 International Bureau Grants Motion for Limited Extension of Time for Filing Reply Comments on Petition of Atlantic Tele-Network for Waiver of the Benchmark Settlement Rate for Guyana. On August 30, 2001, Caribbean Wireless Telecom filed a motion pursuant to 47 C.F.R. � 1.46 of the Commission's Rules to extend the period for filing comments and reply comments for a Waiver of the Benchmark Settlement Rate for Guyana. The Commission extended the deadline to file reply comments until September 28, 2001. Contact: Ken Stanley at (202) 418-1486 (voice). OFFICE OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY ET 99-231; FNPRM & ORDER 05/11/01 (adopted 05/10/01); FCC 01-158 Amendment
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-216265A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-216265A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-216265A1.txt
  • Federal Register; replies due 42 days after publication in the Federal Register. IB 96-261; PN 09/06/01; DA 01-2104 International Bureau Grants Motion for Limited Extension of Time for Filing Reply Comments on Petition of Atlantic Tele-Network for Waiver of the Benchmark Settlement Rate for Guyana. On August 30, 2001, Caribbean Wireless Telecom filed a motion pursuant to 47 C.F.R. � 1.46 of the Commission's Rules to extend the period for filing comments and reply comments for a Waiver of the Benchmark Settlement Rate for Guyana. The Commission extended the deadline to file reply comments until September 28, 2001. Contact: Ken Stanley at (202) 418-1486 (voice). OFFICE OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY ET 99-231; FNPRM & ORDER 05/11/01 (adopted 05/10/01); FCC 01-158 Amendment
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-216925A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-216925A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-216925A1.txt
  • the Federal Register; replies due 42 days after publication in the Federal Register. IB 01-185, ET 95-18; ORDER 10/04/01 (adopted 10/04/01); DA 01-2314 Flexibility for Delivery of Communications by Mobile Satellite Service Providers in the 2 GHz Band, the L-Band, and the 1.6/2.4 GHz Band. On September 25, 2001, Cellular Telephone & Internet Association filed a motion, pursuant to Section 1.46 of the Commission's rules, to extend the period for comments and reply comments to the Notice of Proposed Rule Making in the above-captioned proceeding. The Commission granted CTIA's request for an extended comment period to October 19; and replies to November 5. OFFICE OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY ET 99-231; FNPRM & ORDER 05/11/01 (adopted 05/10/01); FCC 01-158 Amendment of Part
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-217000A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-217000A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-217000A1.txt
  • the Federal Register; replies due 42 days after publication in the Federal Register. IB 01-185, ET 95-18; ORDER 10/04/01 (adopted 10/04/01); DA 01-2314 Flexibility for Delivery of Communications by Mobile Satellite Service Providers in the 2 GHz Band, the L-Band, and the 1.6/2.4 GHz Band. On September 25, 2001, Cellular Telephone & Internet Association filed a motion, pursuant to Section 1.46 of the Commission's rules, to extend the period for comments and reply comments to the Notice of Proposed Rule Making in the above-captioned proceeding. The Commission granted CTIA's request for an extended comment period to October 19*; and replies to November 5. OFFICE OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY ET 99-231; FNPRM & ORDER 05/11/01 (adopted 05/10/01); FCC 01-158 Amendment of Part
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-217195A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-217195A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-217195A1.txt
  • the Federal Register; replies due 42 days after publication in the Federal Register. IB 01-185, ET 95-18; ORDER 10/04/01 (adopted 10/04/01); DA 01-2314 Flexibility for Delivery of Communications by Mobile Satellite Service Providers in the 2 GHz Band, the L-Band, and the 1.6/2.4 GHz Band. On September 25, 2001, Cellular Telephone & Internet Association filed a motion, pursuant to Section 1.46 of the Commission's rules, to extend the period for comments and reply comments to the Notice of Proposed Rule Making in the above-captioned proceeding. The Commission granted CTIA's request for an extended comment period to October 19*; and replies to November 5. OFFICE OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY ET 99-231; FNPRM & ORDER 05/11/01 (adopted 05/10/01); FCC 01-158 Amendment of Part
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-217358A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-217358A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-217358A1.txt
  • the Federal Register; replies due 42 days after publication in the Federal Register. IB 01-185, ET 95-18; ORDER 10/04/01 (adopted 10/04/01); DA 01-2314 Flexibility for Delivery of Communications by Mobile Satellite Service Providers in the 2 GHz Band, the L-Band, and the 1.6/2.4 GHz Band. On September 25, 2001, Cellular Telephone & Internet Association filed a motion, pursuant to Section 1.46 of the Commission's rules, to extend the period for comments and reply comments to the Notice of Proposed Rule Making in the above-captioned proceeding. The Commission granted CTIA's request for an extended comment period to October 19*; and replies to November 5. IB 95-18, 01-185; ORDER 10/31/01 (adopted 10/31/01); DA 01-2548 Flexibility for 185 Delivery of Communications by Mobile Satellite
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-226838A8.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-226838A8.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-226838A8.txt
  • 1: Television Outlets, 1994-2000 year N uhf vhf uhf+vhf network indep. public net+ind+pub 1994 207 2.29 2.63 2.46 1995 207 2.96 2.29 5.25 2.72 2.52 1.71 6.96 1996 207 3.09 2.34 5.43 4.20 1.23 1.71 7.14 1997 207 3.19 2.35 5.54 4.29 1.25 1.71 7.25 1998 207 3.37 2.37 5.74 4.74 1.40 1.72 7.87 1999 207 3.54 2.37 5.91 4.94 1.46 2000 207 3.65 2.39 6.04 5.02 1.57 1.73 8.32 linked sample year N uhf vhf uhf+vhf network indep. public net+ind+pub 1994 2.64 2.88 3.33 1995 143 3.76 2.63 6.38 3.01 3.37 2.04 8.42 1996 143 3.88 2.68 6.56 4.85 1.71 2.03 8.59 1997 143 3.98 2.69 6.67 4.95 1.72 2.03 8.71 1998 143 4.19 2.71 6.90 5.26 1.90 2.05 9.21
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-249262A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-249262A1.txt
  • Number End-User Payouts Retained Number Receipts End-UserPayoutRetained Receipts Net Retained of Billed to Revenues of from Billed to Revenues from Revenues Minutes Revenues Foreign Minutes Foreign RevenuesForeign Foreign for all U.S. 4/ Carriers Carriers 6/ Carriers Carriers and Foreign Minutes 1964 20.2 $62.9 $30.3 $32.6 12.0 $19.6 $3.11 $1.50 $1.62 $1.63 $1.62 1965 25.5 78.2 37.2 41.1 15.4 24.7 3.07 1.46 1.61 1.60 1.61 1966 32.3 100.1 47.6 52.5 18.9 30.1 3.10 1.47 1.63 1.59 1.61 1967 39.7 114.2 54.6 59.6 23.4 31.8 2.88 1.38 1.50 1.36 1.45 1968 46.4 126.9 61.5 65.4 28.2 40.0 2.73 1.33 1.41 1.42 1.41 1969 64.6 172.0 82.7 89.4 38.3 51.6 2.66 1.28 1.38 1.35 1.37 1970 81.1 196.6 98.9 97.7 51.0 59.8 2.43 1.22
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-261024A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-261024A2.txt
  • Data 6/ Number End-UserPayouts Retained Number Receipts End-UserPayout Retained ReceiptsNet Retained of Billed to Revenues of from Billed to Revenues from Revenues Minutes RevenuesForeign Minutes Foreign RevenuesForeign Foreign for all U.S. 4/ Carriers Carriers 6/ Carriers Carriers and Foreign Minutes 1964 20.2 $62.9 $30.3 $32.6 12.0 $19.6 $3.11 $1.50 $1.62 $1.63 $1.62 1965 25.5 78.2 37.2 41.1 15.4 24.7 3.07 1.46 1.61 1.60 1.61 1966 32.3 100.1 47.6 52.5 18.9 30.1 3.10 1.47 1.63 1.59 1.61 1967 39.7 114.2 54.6 59.6 23.4 31.8 2.88 1.38 1.50 1.36 1.45 1968 46.4 126.9 61.5 65.4 28.2 40.0 2.73 1.33 1.41 1.42 1.41 1969 64.6 172.0 82.7 89.4 38.3 51.6 2.66 1.28 1.38 1.35 1.37 1970 81.1 196.6 98.9 97.7 51.0 59.8 2.43 1.22
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A1.txt
  • per Loop Later Year* NTS Revenue of Requirement Projections in Unseparated High-Cost Loop Unseparated Number NTS Revenue Support Payment MAINE Cont. 100031 C WARREN TEL. CO. -2.60 0.28 -2.87 -19.61 100034 C WEST PENOBSCOT TEL. & TEL. CO. -2.57 1.43 -3.94 -100.00 103313 C NORTHLAND TEL. CO. OF MAINE 9.53 -0.86 10.47 33.84 103315 C MID MAINE TELECOM, INC. -1.04 -1.46 0.42 -13.62 105111 C VERIZON NEW ENGLAND INC. DBA VERIZON MAINE 2.21 -3.57 6.00 0.00 MARYLAND Total 5.98 -2.67 8.89 -14.58 180216 C ARMSTRONG TEL. CO. OF MD -0.66 -2.45 1.84 -14.58 185030 C VERIZON MARYLAND INC. 6.00 -2.67 8.91 0.00 MASSACHUSETTS Total 4.86 -4.88 10.24 92.62 110036 C GRANBY TEL. & TELE. CO.-MA 18.83 -0.43 19.34 119.37 110037 C
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A5.txt
  • per Loop Later Year* NTS Revenue of Requirement Projections in Unseparated High-Cost Loop Unseparated Number NTS Revenue Support Payment MAINE Cont. 100031 C WARREN TEL. CO. -2.60 0.28 -2.87 -19.61 100034 C WEST PENOBSCOT TEL. & TEL. CO. -2.57 1.43 -3.94 -100.00 103313 C NORTHLAND TEL. CO. OF MAINE 9.53 -0.86 10.47 33.84 103315 C MID MAINE TELECOM, INC. -1.04 -1.46 0.42 -13.62 105111 C VERIZON NEW ENGLAND INC. DBA VERIZON MAINE 2.21 -3.57 6.00 0.00 MARYLAND Total 5.98 -2.67 8.89 -14.58 180216 C ARMSTRONG TEL. CO. OF MD -0.66 -2.45 1.84 -14.58 185030 C VERIZON MARYLAND INC. 6.00 -2.67 8.91 0.00 MASSACHUSETTS Total 4.86 -4.88 10.24 92.62 110036 C GRANBY TEL. & TELE. CO.-MA 18.83 -0.43 19.34 119.37 110037 C
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A9.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A9.txt
  • 0.23 1.29 0.21 4.04 07/01/98 12/31/98 0.91 0.20 0.99 0.30 3.82 01/01/99 06/30/99 0.82 0.16 0.98 0.32 3.71 07/01/99 12/31/99 0.37 0.10 0.86 0.28 2.82 01/01/00 06/30/00 0.32 0.10 0.86 0.31 2.85 08/11/00 # 06/30/01 0.23 0.07 0.52 0.26 1.91 07/01/01 12/31/01 0.15 0.07 0.48 0.24 1.71 01/01/02 06/30/02 0.15 0.07 0.47 0.24 1.69 07/01/02 06/30/03 0.02 0.01 0.48 0.22 1.46 07/01/03 06/30/04 0.00 0.00 0.48 0.22 1.44 07/01/04 06/30/05 0.00 0.00 0.50 0.25 1.53 * # Source: Access tariff filings. Minute* Minute Minute* Access Access per Switched Carrier Common Line per Terminating Common Line Rates in Effect Interstate Charges for Switched Access Service Non-Traffic Sensitive Total Charge per Carrier Traffic Sensitive Although the charges took effect on July 1, 2000,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-265170A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-265170A1.txt
  • 3,570 21,254 16.80 Utah 842 6,396 13.16 232 2,520 9.21 Vermont 143 2,501 5.72 132 528 25.00 Virgin Islands 0 0 NM 0 0 NM Virginia 1,180 16,606 7.11 1,571 8,355 18.80 Washington 843 18,553 4.54 877 6,498 13.50 West Virginia 277 3,050 9.08 154 1,526 10.09 Wisconsin 570 10,532 5.41 346 5,810 5.96 Wyoming 46 1,024 4.49 10 685 1.46 Totals 50,530 759,772 6.7% 51,224 321,496 15.9% Source: Pooling data provided by NeuStar. 1 Includes only those thousands-blocks in rate centers with pooling. NM - Not meaningful. 26 Table 9 Increased Utilization and Telephone Numbers Saved due to Thousands-Block Pooling as of June 30, 2005 Numbers Numbers Needed Utilization hadIncreased Utilization Numbers Assigned Total Percenthad Whole NXXs Whole NXXs of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-266857A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-266857A1.txt
  • 1.52 1983 3.13 2.82 2.24 2.02 1.55 1984 2.71 2.44 2.21 1.82 1.51 1985 2.72 2.41 2.20 1.81 1.39 1986 2.94 2.62 2.15 1.83 1.43 1987 3.24 2.57 2.31 1.85 1.44 1988 3.23 2.61 2.31 1.82 1.49 1989 3.05 2.61 2.30 1.88 1.43 1990 3.11 2.77 2.37 1.89 1.48 1991 3.08 2.80 2.28 1.84 1.45 1992 3.35 2.77 2.34 1.88 1.46 1993 3.27 2.70 2.45 1.96 1.53 1994 3.17 2.83 2.36 1.95 1.58 1995 3.38 2.71 2.41 1.99 1.55 1996 3.20 2.94 2.46 2.05 1.57 1997 3.24 3.02 2.53 2.09 1.63 1998 3.17 2.79 2.55 2.16 1.69 1999 3.33 2.70 2.49 2.12 1.63 2000 3.21 2.66 2.48 2.15 1.74 2001 2.96 2.74 2.54 2.16 1.74 2002 3.06 2.73 2.52 2.28 1.81
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A1.txt
  • CALIFORNIA -1.16 -2.79 1.67 13.02 COLORADO -4.88 -3.70 -1.23 -7.81 CONNECTICUT -5.71 -4.25 -1.52 0.00 DELAWARE -0.28 -3.20 3.02 0.00 DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA -8.46 -4.93 -3.71 0.00 FLORIDA 3.72 -3.75 7.76 17.84 GEORGIA 3.74 -3.96 8.02 10.72 GUAM 0.81 -0.32 1.13 -10.06 HAWAII 7.02 -3.22 10.58 67.17 IDAHO -6.18 -1.58 -4.68 -7.69 ILLINOIS -2.19 -4.38 2.28 21.00 INDIANA -2.13 -3.54 1.46 30.43 IOWA -1.04 -4.22 3.32 25.76 KANSAS -2.87 -7.00 4.45 4.98 KENTUCKY -1.87 -3.96 2.17 -3.57 LOUISIANA -0.01 -5.02 5.27 -2.15 MAINE 1.10 -4.82 6.22 15.59 MARYLAND -0.77 -3.61 2.94 52.89 MASSACHUSETTS -1.46 -5.16 3.90 -59.52 MICHIGAN -2.05 -4.60 2.68 -1.32 MINNESOTA -1.63 -5.10 3.65 12.83 MISSISSIPPI 1.88 -3.48 5.55 5.94 MISSOURI -3.03 -4.12 1.13 1.29 MONTANA -0.16 -3.19 3.13
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A5.txt
  • CALIFORNIA -1.16 -2.79 1.67 13.02 COLORADO -4.88 -3.70 -1.23 -7.81 CONNECTICUT -5.71 -4.25 -1.52 0.00 DELAWARE -0.28 -3.20 3.02 0.00 DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA -8.46 -4.93 -3.71 0.00 FLORIDA 3.72 -3.75 7.76 17.84 GEORGIA 3.74 -3.96 8.02 10.72 GUAM 0.81 -0.32 1.13 -10.06 HAWAII 7.02 -3.22 10.58 67.17 IDAHO -6.18 -1.58 -4.68 -7.69 ILLINOIS -2.19 -4.38 2.28 21.00 INDIANA -2.13 -3.54 1.46 30.43 IOWA -1.04 -4.22 3.32 25.76 KANSAS -2.87 -7.00 4.45 4.98 KENTUCKY -1.87 -3.96 2.17 -3.57 LOUISIANA -0.01 -5.02 5.27 -2.15 MAINE 1.10 -4.82 6.22 15.59 MARYLAND -0.77 -3.61 2.94 52.89 MASSACHUSETTS -1.46 -5.16 3.90 -59.52 MICHIGAN -2.05 -4.60 2.68 -1.32 MINNESOTA -1.63 -5.10 3.65 12.83 MISSISSIPPI 1.88 -3.48 5.55 5.94 MISSOURI -3.03 -4.12 1.13 1.29 MONTANA -0.16 -3.19 3.13
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A9.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A9.txt
  • 0.68 0.23 1.29 0.21 4.04 07/01/98 12/31/98 0.91 0.20 0.99 0.30 3.82 01/01/99 06/30/99 0.82 0.16 0.98 0.32 3.71 07/01/99 12/31/99 0.37 0.10 0.86 0.28 2.82 01/01/00 06/30/00 0.32 0.10 0.86 0.31 2.85 08/11/00 #06/30/01 0.23 0.07 0.52 0.26 1.91 07/01/01 12/31/01 0.15 0.07 0.48 0.24 1.71 01/01/02 06/30/02 0.15 0.07 0.47 0.24 1.69 07/01/02 06/30/03 0.02 0.01 0.48 0.22 1.46 07/01/03 06/30/04 0.00 0.00 0.48 0.22 1.44 07/01/04 06/30/05 0.00 0.00 0.50 0.25 1.53 07/01/05 06/30/06 0.00 0.00 0.52 0.25 1.59 * # Source: Access tariff filings. Although the charges took effect on July 1, 2000, some companies made adjustments to the tariffs which did not take effect until August 11, 2000. From This table shows average rates (weighted by
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-270407A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-270407A1.txt
  • 0.68 0.23 1.29 0.21 4.04 07/01/98 12/31/98 0.91 0.20 0.99 0.30 3.82 01/01/99 06/30/99 0.82 0.16 0.98 0.32 3.71 07/01/99 12/31/99 0.37 0.10 0.86 0.28 2.82 01/01/00 06/30/00 0.32 0.10 0.86 0.31 2.85 08/11/00 06/31/004 0.23 0.07 0.52 0.26 1.91 07/01/01 12/31/01 0.15 0.07 0.48 0.24 1.71 01/01/02 06/30/02 0.15 0.07 0.47 0.24 1.69 07/01/02 06/30/03 0.02 0.01 0.48 0.22 1.46 07/01/03 06/30/04 0.00 0.00 0.48 0.22 1.44 07/01/04 06/30/05 0.00 0.00 0.50 0.25 1.53 07/01/05 06/30/06 0.00 0.00 0.52 0.25 1.59 07/01/06 06/30/07 0.01 0.00 0.54 0.25 1.63 Source: Access tariff filings. 4 Although the charges took effect on July 1, 2000, some companies made adjustments to the tariffs which did not take effect until August 11, 2000. 1 This
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A1.txt
  • Intrastate Intrastate Lines Percentage End-User Total End-User Total Jun 05 1/ Revenues Revenues Revenues Revenues Alabama 393,856 1.16% $60 $83 $106 $131 Alaska NA NA NA NA NA NA American Samoa NA NA NA NA NA NA Arizona 864,526 2.55 131 183 232 288 Arkansas 181,656 0.53 28 38 49 61 California 4,030,126 11.87 613 851 1,080 1,343 Colorado 496,728 1.46 75 105 133 166 Connecticut 316,131 0.93 48 67 85 105 Delaware 121,800 0.36 19 26 33 41 District of Columbia 222,977 0.66 34 47 60 74 Florida 1,744,981 5.14 265 369 468 581 Georgia 1,032,383 3.04 157 218 277 344 Guam NA NA NA NA NA NA Hawaii 38,447 0.11 6 8 10 13 Idaho 77,018 0.23 12 16
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A13.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A13.txt
  • - Florida FL (120,919) (120,745) (174) 0.14 Embarq - Florida FL (2,254) (1,791) (463) 20.54 Windstream Georgia Communications GA (332) (242) (91) 27.41 AT&T - BellSouth - Georgia GA (87,030) (87,145) 115 (0.13) Verizon - Northwest - Idaho ID (3,280) (3,274) (5) 0.15 Qwest - Idaho South ID (770) (696) (73) 9.48 Qwest - Idaho North ID (137) (135) (2) 1.46 Verizon North - Contel/Illinois IL 1,632 1,636 (3) (0.18) Verizon South - Illinois IL (153) (153) 0 0.00 Verizon North - Illinois IL 12,099 12,109 (11) (0.09) AT&T - Ameritech - Illinois Bell IL (160,144) (160,494) 350 (0.22) Verizon North - Contel/Indiana IN (2,542) (2,537) (5) 0.20 Verizon North - Indiana IN (615) (592) (24) 3.90 AT&T - Ameritech -
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A3.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A3.txt
  • Intrastate Intrastate Lines Percentage End-User Total End-User Total Jun 05 1/ Revenues Revenues Revenues Revenues Alabama 393,856 1.16% $60 $83 $106 $131 Alaska NA NA NA NA NA NA American Samoa NA NA NA NA NA NA Arizona 864,526 2.55 131 183 232 288 Arkansas 181,656 0.53 28 38 49 61 California 4,030,126 11.87 613 851 1,080 1,343 Colorado 496,728 1.46 75 105 133 166 Connecticut 316,131 0.93 48 67 85 105 Delaware 121,800 0.36 19 26 33 41 District of Columbia 222,977 0.66 34 47 60 74 Florida 1,744,981 5.14 265 369 468 581 Georgia 1,032,383 3.04 157 218 277 344 Guam NA NA NA NA NA NA Hawaii 38,447 0.11 6 8 10 13 Idaho 77,018 0.23 12 16
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A5.txt
  • 1.30 -0.98 2.30 -0.81 250315 C PINE BELT TEL. CO. 12.38 -1.61 14.22 23.57 250316 C RAGLAND TEL. CO. 2.59 -10.01 14.00 8.03 250317 C ROANOKE TEL. CO., INC. 12.60 -3.65 16.87 61.31 250318 C FRONTIER COMMUNICATIONS OF THE SOUTH, LLC -9.77 -2.50 -7.46 -60.92 250322 A UNION SPRINGS TEL. CO. 2.47 -1.80 4.35 8.55 255181 C SOUTH CENTRAL BELL-AL 1.46 -3.64 5.29 0.00 259788 C CENTURYTEL OF ALABAMA, LLC (SOUTHERN) -4.28 -6.01 1.83 -18.34 259789 C CENTURYTEL OF ALABAMA, LLC (NORTHERN) -3.59 -4.50 0.96 -19.42 TOTAL ALASKA -1.36 -6.16 5.12 -6.43 610989 C ADAK EAGLE ENTERPRISES, LLC DBA ADAK TEL UTIL -98.82 0.00 -98.82 -100.00 613000 C ACS OF ANCHORAGE, INC. 2.85 -12.62 17.70 0.00 613001 C ARCTIC SLOPE TEL.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A9.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A9.txt
  • 0.68 0.23 1.29 0.21 4.04 07/01/98 12/31/98 0.91 0.20 0.99 0.30 3.82 01/01/99 06/30/99 0.82 0.16 0.98 0.32 3.71 07/01/99 12/31/99 0.37 0.10 0.86 0.28 2.82 01/01/00 06/30/00 0.32 0.10 0.86 0.31 2.85 08/11/00 #06/30/01 0.23 0.07 0.52 0.26 1.91 07/01/01 12/31/01 0.15 0.07 0.48 0.24 1.71 01/01/02 06/30/02 0.15 0.07 0.47 0.24 1.69 07/01/02 06/30/03 0.02 0.01 0.48 0.22 1.46 07/01/03 06/30/04 0.00 0.00 0.48 0.22 1.44 07/01/04 06/30/05 0.00 0.00 0.50 0.25 1.53 07/01/05 06/30/06 0.00 0.00 0.52 0.25 1.59 07/01/06 06/30/07 0.01 0.00 0.54 0.25 1.63 * # Source: Access tariff filings. Although the charges took effect on July 1, 2000, some companies made adjustments to the tariffs which did not take effect until August 11, 2000. From
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-284932A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-284932A1.txt
  • 0.68 0.23 1.29 0.21 4.04 07/01/98 12/31/98 0.91 0.20 0.99 0.30 3.82 01/01/99 06/30/99 0.82 0.16 0.98 0.32 3.71 07/01/99 12/31/99 0.37 0.10 0.86 0.28 2.82 01/01/00 06/30/00 0.32 0.10 0.86 0.31 2.85 08/11/00 06/31/004 0.23 0.07 0.52 0.26 1.91 07/01/01 12/31/01 0.15 0.07 0.48 0.24 1.71 01/01/02 06/30/02 0.15 0.07 0.47 0.24 1.69 07/01/02 06/30/03 0.02 0.01 0.48 0.22 1.46 07/01/03 06/30/04 0.00 0.00 0.48 0.22 1.44 07/01/04 06/30/05 0.00 0.00 0.50 0.25 1.53 07/01/05 06/30/06 0.00 0.00 0.52 0.25 1.59 07/01/06 06/30/07 0.01 0.00 0.54 0.25 1.63 07/01/07 06/30/08 0.01 0.00 0.56 0.26 1.71 Source: Access tariff filings. Rates in Effect From To Sensitive per Switched Interstate Charges for Switched Access Service Minute 2 Traffic Sensitive per Switched Minute
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-284934A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-284934A1.txt
  • 1.52 1983 3.13 2.82 2.24 2.02 1.55 1984 2.71 2.44 2.21 1.82 1.51 1985 2.72 2.41 2.20 1.81 1.39 1986 2.94 2.62 2.15 1.83 1.43 1987 3.24 2.57 2.31 1.85 1.44 1988 3.23 2.61 2.31 1.82 1.49 1989 3.05 2.61 2.30 1.88 1.43 1990 3.11 2.77 2.37 1.89 1.48 1991 3.08 2.80 2.28 1.84 1.45 1992 3.35 2.77 2.34 1.88 1.46 1993 3.27 2.70 2.45 1.96 1.53 1994 3.17 2.83 2.36 1.95 1.58 1995 3.38 2.71 2.41 1.99 1.55 1996 3.20 2.94 2.46 2.05 1.57 1997 3.24 3.02 2.53 2.09 1.63 1998 3.17 2.79 2.55 2.16 1.69 1999 3.33 2.70 2.49 2.12 1.63 2000 3.21 2.66 2.48 2.15 1.74 2001 2.96 2.74 2.54 2.16 1.74 2002 3.06 2.73 2.52 2.28 1.81
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-285373A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-285373A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-285373A1.txt
  • nationwide. For illustrative purposes, however, and conservatively assuming that the number of calls would have increased by 50% if Wilmington had twice the number of over-the-air-exclusive households-thus tracking the national average-the total number of calls would have been 2,304-or 1.28% of the 180,000 total households in the market. Assuming 114.5 million TV households in the U.S., that could mean that 1.46 million consumers could be looking for answers when full-power analog broadcasting ends next February. Action Item: The Commission should significantly ramp up its Call Center operations. Augmented front-line staff should be trained to identify the nature of consumer problems and solve them if they can. If the front-line staff cannot resolve a particular issue, they should have resources at their
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287688A1.pdf
  • 1.02 Georgia 4,166,995 87.5 1.14 Guam 62,640 0.0 NA Hawaii 587,742 98.8 1.01 Idaho 673,389 90.2 1.11 Illinois 6,463,779 94.9 1.05 Indiana 3,071,465 95.2 1.05 Iowa 1,381,950 80.2 1.25 Kansas 1,191,789 81.6 1.23 Kentucky 1,811,672 91.0 1.10 Louisiana 1,904,437 91.2 1.10 Maine 730,041 81.6 1.23 Maryland 3,280,666 99.8 1.00 Massachusetts 3,232,105 99.9 1.00 Michigan 4,684,096 95.8 1.04 Minnesota 2,424,889 68.7 1.46 Mississippi 1,190,411 92.5 1.08 Missouri 2,927,211 89.9 1.11 Montana 449,085 64.2 1.56 Nebraska 719,163 76.8 1.30 Nevada 1,184,146 95.2 1.05 New Hampshire 673,032 92.1 1.09 New Jersey 5,048,228 99.8 1.00 New Mexico 872,062 84.2 1.19 New York 9,183,939 96.2 1.04 North Carolina 4,120,305 88.9 1.12 North Dakota 318,467 50.1 1.99 N. Mariana Islands 20,926 0.0 NA Ohio 5,433,993 94.6 1.06
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287688A3.pdf
  • 1.02 Georgia 4,166,995 87.5 1.14 Guam 62,640 0.0 NA Hawaii 587,742 98.8 1.01 Idaho 673,389 90.2 1.11 Illinois 6,463,779 94.9 1.05 Indiana 3,071,465 95.2 1.05 Iowa 1,381,950 80.2 1.25 Kansas 1,191,789 81.6 1.23 Kentucky 1,811,672 91.0 1.10 Louisiana 1,904,437 91.2 1.10 Maine 730,041 81.6 1.23 Maryland 3,280,666 99.8 1.00 Massachusetts 3,232,105 99.9 1.00 Michigan 4,684,096 95.8 1.04 Minnesota 2,424,889 68.7 1.46 Mississippi 1,190,411 92.5 1.08 Missouri 2,927,211 89.9 1.11 Montana 449,085 64.2 1.56 Nebraska 719,163 76.8 1.30 Nevada 1,184,146 95.2 1.05 New Hampshire 673,032 92.1 1.09 New Jersey 5,048,228 99.8 1.00 New Mexico 872,062 84.2 1.19 New York 9,183,939 96.2 1.04 North Carolina 4,120,305 88.9 1.12 North Dakota 318,467 50.1 1.99 N. Mariana Islands 20,926 0.0 NA Ohio 5,433,993 94.6 1.06
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287688A5.pdf
  • 6.40 -0.61 7.06 0.00 613018 C NUSHAGAK ELECTRIC & TELEPHONE COOP., INC. 7.57 2.60 4.84 9.64 613019 C OTZ TELEPHONE COOPERATIVE, INC. -7.57 1.87 -9.27 -23.53 613020 C ACS - NORTHLAND SITKA -4.25 -0.81 -3.46 -31.58 613022 C ACS - ALASKA GREATLAND -28.32 12.21 -36.12 0.00 613023 C UNITED UTILITIES INC. 2.50 1.08 1.41 -1.57 613023A C UNITED UTILITIES INC. -1.46 -1.63 0.18 -100.00 613025 C YUKON TELEPHONE COMPANY, INC. -9.01 -1.98 -7.17 -25.60 613026 A NORTH COUNTRY TELEPHONE COMPANY 11.49 7.78 3.43 12.11 613028 C SUMMIT TEL & TEL CO OF ALASKA 10.33 7.48 2.64 10.26 TOTAL AMERICAN SAMOA -9.91 -1.92 -8.15 0.00 673900 C AMERICAN SAMOA TELECOMMUNICATIONS AUTHORITY -9.91 -1.92 -8.15 0.00 TOTAL ARIZONA -8.53 -6.95 -1.70 -6.11 450815
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287688A9.pdf
  • 6.04 07/01/9712/31/97 0.64 0.84 1.63 0.14 5.18 01/01/9806/30/98 0.68 0.23 1.29 0.21 4.04 07/01/9812/31/98 0.91 0.20 0.99 0.30 3.82 01/01/9906/30/99 0.82 0.16 0.98 0.32 3.71 07/01/9912/31/99 0.37 0.10 0.86 0.28 2.82 01/01/0006/30/00 0.32 0.10 0.86 0.31 2.85 08/11/0006/31/004 0.23 0.07 0.52 0.26 1.91 07/01/0112/31/01 0.15 0.07 0.48 0.24 1.71 01/01/0206/30/02 0.15 0.07 0.47 0.24 1.69 07/01/0206/30/03 0.02 0.01 0.48 0.22 1.46 07/01/0306/30/04 0.00 0.00 0.48 0.22 1.44 07/01/0406/30/05 0.00 0.00 0.50 0.25 1.53 07/01/0506/30/06 0.00 0.00 0.52 0.25 1.59 07/01/0606/30/07 0.01 0.00 0.54 0.25 1.63 07/01/0706/30/08 0.01 0.00 0.56 0.26 1.71 Source: Access tariff filings. Rates in Effect From To Sensitive per Switched Interstate Charges for Switched Access Service Minute 2 Traffic Sensitive per Switched Minute Non-Traffic Minute 1 Carrier Common
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-292593A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-292593A1.txt
  • Low-Income Households All Households 1984 to 1997 1997 to 2008 1984 to 1997 1997 to 2008 Ohio 1987 5.24 81.0% 88.5% 95.1% 7.5% * 6.7% 93.2% 95.0% 97.1% 1.8% 2.0% Oklahoma 1996 1.63 81.9% 78.9% 90.3% -3.0% 11.4%* 91.0% 91.8% 94.8% 0.7% 3.1% Oregon 1986 5.21 76.4% 90.5% 94.4% 14.1% * 3.8% 91.4% 95.3% 97.3% 3.9% * 2.0% Pennsylvania 1996 1.46 85.6% 93.6% 94.0% 8.0% * 0.4% 94.4% 97.3% 97.7% 3.0% * 0.3% Rhode Island 1987 5.25 86.4% 87.6% 90.5% 1.2% 2.9% 94.0% 94.6% 96.3% 0.5% 1.7% South Carolina 1995 5.25 66.1% 76.2% 82.8% 10.1% * 6.6% 85.1% 92.0% 91.8% 6.9% * -0.3% South Dakota 1988 0.46 84.6% 90.5% 91.3% 5.9% 0.8% 93.0% 94.7% 96.3% 1.7% 1.5% Tennessee 1992 4.78 71.1%
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A1.txt
  • 801 2,177 4,665 7,128 11,794 3.94 Indiana 1,545 2,896 4,442 670 412 1,082 2,216 3,308 5,524 1.84 Iowa 824 1,391 2,216 396 260 657 1,221 1,651 2,872 0.96 Kansas 742 1,367 2,110 359 162 521 1,102 1,529 2,631 0.88 Kentucky 1,048 2,086 3,134 437 322 760 1,485 2,409 3,894 1.30 Louisiana 1,138 2,460 3,599 439 331 770 1,577 2,791 4,369 1.46 Maine 347 774 1,121 181 109 290 528 883 1,411 0.47 Maryland 1,805 3,190 4,995 872 398 1,270 2,677 3,589 6,266 2.09 Massachusetts 1,828 3,771 5,600 897 466 1,364 2,726 4,238 6,963 2.33 Michigan 2,283 4,785 7,068 973 704 1,677 3,256 5,489 8,745 2.92 Minnesota 1,291 2,448 3,740 643 339 982 1,934 2,788 4,722 1.58 Mississippi 724 1,469 2,193 307
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A3.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A3.txt
  • 801 2,177 4,665 7,128 11,794 3.94 Indiana 1,545 2,896 4,442 670 412 1,082 2,216 3,308 5,524 1.84 Iowa 824 1,391 2,216 396 260 657 1,221 1,651 2,872 0.96 Kansas 742 1,367 2,110 359 162 521 1,102 1,529 2,631 0.88 Kentucky 1,048 2,086 3,134 437 322 760 1,485 2,409 3,894 1.30 Louisiana 1,138 2,460 3,599 439 331 770 1,577 2,791 4,369 1.46 Maine 347 774 1,121 181 109 290 528 883 1,411 0.47 Maryland 1,805 3,190 4,995 872 398 1,270 2,677 3,589 6,266 2.09 Massachusetts 1,828 3,771 5,600 897 466 1,364 2,726 4,238 6,963 2.33 Michigan 2,283 4,785 7,068 973 704 1,677 3,256 5,489 8,745 2.92 Minnesota 1,291 2,448 3,740 643 339 982 1,934 2,788 4,722 1.58 Mississippi 724 1,469 2,193 307
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A5.txt
  • 1.85 -5.43 401721 C RICE BELT TEL. CO.,INC. 10.91 -5.06 16.82 23.19 401722 A E. RITTER TELEPHONE COMPANY -10.84 -5.37 -5.79 -41.53 401724 C SOUTHWEST ARKANSAS TEL. COOP. INC. 8.87 -5.79 15.55 20.67 401726 C TRI-COUNTY TEL. CO. INC.-AR 8.25 -3.24 11.87 15.58 401727 C CENTURYTEL OF SOUTH ARKANSAS, INC. 5.30 -6.32 12.41 9.61 401729 C WALNUT HILL TELEPHONE COMPANY -1.46 -4.55 3.23 -2.80 401733 C YELCOT TEL. CO.,INC. -2.69 -5.90 3.42 -6.93 401734 C ARKWEST COMMUNICATIONS, INC. -0.66 -3.11 2.53 -5.80 403031 C SCOTT COUNTY TELEPHONE COMPANY 25.81 -3.15 29.91 34.96 405211 C SOUTHWESTERN BELL-ARKANSAS 3.06 -7.27 11.14 INFINITE CALIFORNIA TOTAL 4.81 -6.27 11.82 5.50 542301 C CALAVERAS TELEPHONE COMPANY 4.79 -1.90 6.82 5.78 542302 C VERIZON CALIFORNIA INC.-CA (CONTEL)
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A9.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A9.txt
  • 0.68 0.23 1.29 0.21 4.04 07/01/98 12/31/98 0.91 0.20 0.99 0.30 3.82 01/01/99 06/30/99 0.82 0.16 0.98 0.32 3.71 07/01/99 12/31/99 0.37 0.10 0.86 0.28 2.82 01/01/00 06/30/00 0.32 0.10 0.86 0.31 2.85 08/11/00 06/31/004 0.23 0.07 0.52 0.26 1.91 07/01/01 12/31/01 0.15 0.07 0.48 0.24 1.71 01/01/02 06/30/02 0.15 0.07 0.47 0.24 1.69 07/01/02 06/30/03 0.02 0.01 0.48 0.22 1.46 07/01/03 06/30/04 0.00 0.00 0.48 0.22 1.44 07/01/04 06/30/05 0.00 0.00 0.50 0.25 1.53 07/01/05 06/30/06 0.00 0.00 0.52 0.25 1.59 07/01/06 06/30/07 0.01 0.00 0.54 0.25 1.63 07/01/07 06/30/08 0.01 0.00 0.56 0.26 1.71 07/01/08 06/30/09 0.01 0.00 0.63 0.24 1.77 07/01/09 06/30/10 0.00 0.00 0.64 0.26 1.85 Source: Access tariff filings. Rates in Effect From To Sensitive per
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295651A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295651A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295651A1.txt
  • December 21, 2009 and that the copy sent via FAX was not received because the FAX number previously provided by AST Telecom is no longer in service. AST Telecom states that the brief extension of time that it requests will not adversely affect the Commission's proceeding or third parties. A motion for an extension of time is governed by Section 1.46 of the Commission's Rules, and it is the policy of the Commission that extensions of time shall not be routinely granted. In this instance, AST Telecom has been aware of the need to provide the Commission with updated, accurate and complete information concerning its application, and has an affirmative obligation to inform the Commission of material changes in the application.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-301823A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-301823A1.txt
  • 0.68 0.23 1.29 0.21 4.04 07/01/98 12/31/98 0.91 0.20 0.99 0.30 3.82 01/01/99 06/30/99 0.82 0.16 0.98 0.32 3.71 07/01/99 12/31/99 0.37 0.10 0.86 0.28 2.82 01/01/00 06/30/00 0.32 0.10 0.86 0.31 2.85 08/11/00 06/31/004 0.23 0.07 0.52 0.26 1.91 07/01/01 12/31/01 0.15 0.07 0.48 0.24 1.71 01/01/02 06/30/02 0.15 0.07 0.47 0.24 1.69 07/01/02 06/30/03 0.02 0.01 0.48 0.22 1.46 07/01/03 06/30/04 0.00 0.00 0.48 0.22 1.44 07/01/04 06/30/05 0.00 0.00 0.50 0.25 1.53 07/01/05 06/30/06 0.00 0.00 0.52 0.25 1.59 07/01/06 06/30/07 0.01 0.00 0.54 0.25 1.63 07/01/07 06/30/08 0.01 0.00 0.56 0.26 1.71 07/01/08 06/30/09 0.01 0.00 0.63 0.24 1.80 07/01/09 06/30/10 0.00 0.00 0.64 0.26 1.85 Source: Access tariff filings. Rates in Effect From To Sensitive per
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303886A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303886A1.txt
  • 6 1.50 3,896 1.52 4,249,605 1.35 Maine 579 0.46 211 0.48 1 0.14 972 0.38 1,393,823 0.44 Maryland 2,792 2.24 854 1.95 4 1.04 5,124 2.00 7,729,202 2.45 Massachusetts 2,609 2.09 1,590 3.63 6 1.55 5,624 2.20 6,513,904 2.06 Michigan 3,719 2.98 1,442 3.29 10 2.39 7,821 3.06 7,930,336 2.51 Minnesota 2,006 1.61 873 1.99 7 1.68 4,164 1.63 4,623,973 1.46 Mississippi 1,018 0.82 182 0.42 4 0.99 2,252 0.88 3,229,711 1.02 Missouri 2,568 2.06 519 1.19 6 1.42 4,835 1.89 6,674,043 2.11 Montana 406 0.33 101 0.23 2 0.40 723 0.28 1,244,348 0.39 Nebraska 606 0.49 298 0.68 2 0.58 1,451 0.57 1,795,825 0.57 Nevada 1,042 0.84 414 0.95 6 1.58 2,249 0.88 3,474,657 1.10 New Hampshire 507 0.41 343
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303886A3.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303886A3.txt
  • 6 1.50 3,896 1.52 4,249,605 1.35 Maine 579 0.46 211 0.48 1 0.14 972 0.38 1,393,823 0.44 Maryland 2,792 2.24 854 1.95 4 1.04 5,124 2.00 7,729,202 2.45 Massachusetts 2,609 2.09 1,590 3.63 6 1.55 5,624 2.20 6,513,904 2.06 Michigan 3,719 2.98 1,442 3.29 10 2.39 7,821 3.06 7,930,336 2.51 Minnesota 2,006 1.61 873 1.99 7 1.68 4,164 1.63 4,623,973 1.46 Mississippi 1,018 0.82 182 0.42 4 0.99 2,252 0.88 3,229,711 1.02 Missouri 2,568 2.06 519 1.19 6 1.42 4,835 1.89 6,674,043 2.11 Montana 406 0.33 101 0.23 2 0.40 723 0.28 1,244,348 0.39 Nebraska 606 0.49 298 0.68 2 0.58 1,451 0.57 1,795,825 0.57 Nevada 1,042 0.84 414 0.95 6 1.58 2,249 0.88 3,474,657 1.10 New Hampshire 507 0.41 343
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303886A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303886A5.txt
  • A FT RANDALL-MT RUSHMR 1.84 -3.73 5.78 -25.65 391664 A JAMES VALLEY COOP 18.30 -3.06 22.03 71.51 391666 C JEFFERSON TEL CO -SD -0.40 -3.85 3.60 -3.00 391667 C GOLDEN WEST-KADOKA -2.48 -1.89 -0.60 -60.71 391668 C KENNEBEC TEL CO -4.38 10.08 -13.14 -11.63 391669 A TRIOTEL COMM-MCCOOK 18.85 -0.24 19.14 65.46 391670 C MIDSTATE COMM., INC. 0.74 -5.30 6.37 -1.46 391671 A WEST RIVER(MOBRIDGE) -3.41 -1.91 -1.53 0.00 391674 C ROBERTS COUNTY COOP -0.43 -1.59 1.18 -7.38 391676 C SANTEL COMM. COOP. -5.51 -2.62 -2.97 -18.10 391677 A GOLDEN WEST-SIOUX VY 2.30 -2.47 4.89 -44.73 391679 C STOCKHOLM-STRANDBURG -3.99 -3.11 -0.91 -24.01 391680 C VENTURE COMM. COOP 2.12 -1.17 3.33 -4.19 391680A C VENTURE COMM. COOP -8.15 -1.68 -6.58 -100.00
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303886A9.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303886A9.txt
  • 0.68 0.23 1.29 0.21 4.04 07/01/98 12/31/98 0.91 0.20 0.99 0.30 3.82 01/01/99 06/30/99 0.82 0.16 0.98 0.32 3.71 07/01/99 12/31/99 0.37 0.10 0.86 0.28 2.82 01/01/00 06/30/00 0.32 0.10 0.86 0.31 2.85 08/11/00 06/31/004 0.23 0.07 0.52 0.26 1.91 07/01/01 12/31/01 0.15 0.07 0.48 0.24 1.71 01/01/02 06/30/02 0.15 0.07 0.47 0.24 1.69 07/01/02 06/30/03 0.02 0.01 0.48 0.22 1.46 07/01/03 06/30/04 0.00 0.00 0.48 0.22 1.44 07/01/04 06/30/05 0.00 0.00 0.50 0.25 1.53 07/01/05 06/30/06 0.00 0.00 0.52 0.25 1.59 07/01/06 06/30/07 0.01 0.00 0.54 0.25 1.63 07/01/07 06/30/08 0.01 0.00 0.56 0.26 1.71 07/01/08 06/30/09 0.01 0.00 0.63 0.24 1.80 07/01/09 06/30/10 0.00 0.00 0.64 0.26 1.85 07/01/10 06/30/11 0.00 0.00 0.67 0.27 1.92 Source: Access tariff filings.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-311775A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-311775A1.txt
  • 3.50 1.75 9.94 13.44 Georgia 8.25 3.38 1.69 9.94 13.32 8.25 3.50 1.75 10.00 13.49 8.25 3.47 1.73 9.98 13.45 Guam 8.25 3.50 1.75 10.00 13.50 NA NA NA NA NA 8.25 3.50 1.75 10.00 13.50 Hawaii 8.25 0.00 0.00 8.25 8.25 NA NA NA NA NA 8.25 0.00 0.00 8.25 8.25 Idaho 8.16 3.47 1.74 9.90 13.37 8.25 2.93 1.46 9.71 12.64 8.17 3.42 1.71 9.88 13.30 Illinois 6.57 0.00 0.00 6.57 6.57 6.43 1.84 0.92 7.35 9.20 6.45 1.52 0.76 7.22 8.74 Indiana 7.51 0.00 0.00 7.51 7.51 7.93 3.45 1.72 9.66 13.11 7.54 0.26 0.13 7.68 7.94 Iowa 7.08 0.00 0.00 7.08 7.08 7.17 0.00 0.00 7.17 7.17 7.09 0.00 0.00 7.09 7.09 Kansas 7.25 3.50 1.75 9.00
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-143A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-143A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-143A1.txt
  • the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 154(i), 155(c)(5), and Section 1.115(g) of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.115, the Application for Review filed by Linda Chester on March 10, 2000, IS DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to Section 4(i) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. � 154(i), and Section 1.46 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.46, the Motion for Extension of Time filed by Ronna L. Sauro on March 27, 2000, IS DISMISSED AS MOOT. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Magalie Roman Salas Secretary Linda Chester Application for Review (filed Mar. 10, 2000). On March 27, 2000, Ronna L. Sauro filed a Motion for Extension of Time to file a
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-277A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-277A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-277A1.txt
  • 28, 1998). The Petitioners state that they are appealing that decision. Letter from Raymond G. Bender, Counsel for Comsat and Lockheed Martin, to Magalie Roman Salas, Secretary, FCC (June 27, 2000); Letter from Keith H. Fagan, Attorney for Comsat, to Magalie Roman Salas, Secretary, FCC (June 26, 2000). FCC Public Notice Request No. SAT-00040, April 4, 2000. See 47 CFR 1.46. In re Comsat Corporation, 13 FCC Rcd 2714 (1998)(Consolidated Order). Specifically, LRT repeats allegations that Comsat (1) violated Commission's structure policy (1-SAT-ISP-96); failed to obtain Commission approval under Section 201(c) of the Satellite Act of its acquisition of Belcom stock and other subsidiaries (117 SAT DR-96 and 118-SAT-DR-96); (2) should be enjoined from payment of dividends on retained earnings (64-SAT-DR-97
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-277A1_Erratum.doc
  • 28, 1998). The Petitioners state that they are appealing that decision. Letter from Raymond G. Bender, Counsel for Comsat and Lockheed Martin, to Magalie Roman Salas, Secretary, FCC (June 27, 2000); Letter from Keith H. Fagan, Attorney for Comsat, to Magalie Roman Salas, Secretary, FCC (June 26, 2000). FCC Public Notice Request No. SAT-00040, April 4, 2000. See 47 CFR 1.46. In re Comsat Corporation, 13 FCC Rcd 2714 (1998)(Consolidated Order). Specifically, LRT repeats allegations that Comsat (1) violated Commission's structure policy (1-SAT-ISP-96); failed to obtain Commission approval under Section 201(c) of the Satellite Act of its acquisition of Belcom stock and other subsidiaries (117 SAT DR-96 and 118-SAT-DR-96); (2) should be enjoined from payment of dividends on retained earnings (64-SAT-DR-97
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-369A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-369A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-369A1.txt
  • Telenor and Comsat to Motion for Waiver to Accept Pleading, September 9, 2001). 47 C.F.R. � 1.3. See Northeast Cellular Tel. Co. v. FCC, 897 F.2d 1164, 1166 (D.C. Cir. 1990), citing WAIT Radio v. FCC, 418 F.2d 1153, 1159 (D.C. Cir. 1970) (indicating need for articulation of special circumstances beyond those considered during regular rulemaking). See 47 C.F.R. � 1.46. 47 U.S.C. �� 214(a) and 310(d). 47 U.S.C. � 310. See, e.g., Application of VoiceStream Wireless Corporation, Powertel, Inc., Transferors, and Deutsche Telekom AG, Transferee, for Consent to Transfer Control of Licenses and Authorizations Pursuant to Sections 214 and 310(d) of the Communications Act and for Declaratory Ruling Pursuant to Section 310 of the Communications Act, Memorandum Opinion and Order,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-391A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-391A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-391A1.txt
  • IS GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART as provided herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, the Wireless Telecommunications Bureau SHALL RETURN FCC File Nos. 592687, 592691, 592693, 592694, 592695, 592696, 592697, and 592698 to pending status. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to Section 4(i) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. � 154(i), and Section 1.46 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.46, the Motion for Leave to File Opposition to Application for Review filed by Lone Star Radio, Inc. on December 8, 1999, IS GRANTED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Magalie Roman Salas Secretary LMR Systems, Inc. Application for Review (filed. Nov. 12, 1999) (Application for Review). Four oppositions to LMR's Application for Review were filed.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-61A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-61A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-61A1.txt
  • complains that the Bureau improperly granted ALI's second, non-consensual request for an extension of time in which to respond to the staff's inquiry letter (Unity did not object to ALI's first request for a two-week extension). In the inquiry letter the staff requested a response by February 17, 2000; the response was filed March 10, 2000. While under 47 C.F.R. �1.46 we do not routinely grant extensions of time, in the instant case we find that there was good cause to extend the time by a total of three weeks, both to accommodate ALI's counsel's medical treatments and to permit the full development of the record in this case. See, e.g., Fanch Cablevision of Colorado, 12 FCC Rcd. 6034, 6035 (1997);
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-107A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-107A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-107A1.txt
  • Standard error 0.54 0.80 0.51 -- --- Programming total $31.45 $29.59 $31.57 $1.98 6.7%* Standard error 0.33 0.57 0.31 -- --- Equipment $2.97 $2.90 $2.97 $0.07 2.4% Standard error 0.11 0.16 0.11 -- --- Programming and equipment $34.42 $32.49 $34.54 $2.05 6.3%* Standard error 0.35 0.61 0.33 -- --- Number of channels 56.27 57.47 56.20 -1.27 -2.2% Standard error 1.03 1.46 0.97 -- --- Rate per channel � $.0.591 $0.551 $0.594 $0.043 7.8% Standard error 0.01 0.02 0.01 -- --- No. of satellite channels 42.16 43.41 42.09 -1.33 -3.1% Standard error 0.86 1.26 0.83 -- --- Rate per satellite channel $0.797 $0.751 $0.800 $0.049 6.5% Standard error 0.02 0.04 0.02 -- --- July 1, 1999 Programming total $29.71 $27.96 $29.83 $1.87
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-205A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-205A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-205A1.txt
  • IVDS) 5 10 1,250 1,366 27 25 1,250 Marine (Ship) 5,200 10 550,000 601,150 12 10 520,000 GMRS 3,180 5 50,000 54,650 3 5 79,500 Aviation (Aircraft) 2,700 10 175,000 191,275 7 5 135,000 Marine (Coast) 900 10 65,000 71,045 8 10 90,000 Aviation (Ground) 2,000 5 85,000 92,905 9 10 100,000 Amateur Vanity Call Signs 9,000 10 120,000 131,160 1.46 1.45 130,500 AM Class A 76 1 146,300 159,906 2,104 2,100 159,600 AM Class B 1,672 1 1,806,300 1,974,286 1,181 1,175 1,964,600 AM Class C 990 1 618,760 676,305 683 685 678,150 AM Class D 1,933 1 2,033,850 2,222,998 1,150 1,150 2,222,950 FM Classes A, B1 & C3 3,192 1 4,160,000 4,546,880 1,424 1,425 4,548,600 FM Classes B, C, C1
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-21A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-21A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-21A1.txt
  • Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to Sections 4(i) and 5(c) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 154(i), 155(c), and Section 1.115 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.115, the consolidated Application for Review filed by James A. Kay, Jr. on May 4, 2001, IS DISMISSED. IT IS ALSO ORDERED that, pursuant to Section 1.46 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.46, that the Motion for Extension of Time jointly filed by Charles T. Crawford, Dennis Enyeart, Radiowave Communications, William Sorrentino, and US Mobile Wireless, on May 22, 2001, IS GRANTED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION William F. Caton Acting Secretary Application for Review (filed May 4, 2001) (Kay AFR). Letter from Mary Shultz, Chief, Licensing
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-330A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-330A1.txt
  • 0.33 0.07 0.33 0.02 0.33 3 - 301500Elct:EDI-CLEO/LASR Line Sharing Syntax 0.20 0.33 0.17 0.33 0.15 0.33 0.16 0.33 0.18 0.33 3 - 301600Elct Man:LEX-CLEO/LASR (Exc to LSC) Line Sharing Content Errs 2.42 5.00 2.03 5.00 1.79 5.00 2.44 5.00 2.25 5.00 c 3 - 301700Elct Man:EDI-CLEO/LASR (Exc to LSC) Line Sharing Content Errs 1.66 5.00 1.82 5.00 1.67 5.00 1.46 5.00 1.95 5.00 3 - 310100Man:EXACT Facilities Content Errs 2.48 5.00 3.05 5.00 4.45 5.00 2.07 5.00 1.76 5.00 3 - 310200Man-Man:EXACT Facilities Content Errs 0.7810.00 1.8210.00 2.3510.00 10.00 10.00abcde 3 - 320000Projects - All other Products 99.7190.00 99.4490.00 98.7990.00 99.7890.00100.0090.00 4 - 410400LEX/EDI LASR FTE:Standalone LNP-Svc Migration w/chgs 51.89 tbd 53.92 tbd 55.27 tbd 56.82 tbd 55.00 tbd 4
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-331A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-331A1.txt
  • 1 B.2.1.3.1.1Loop + Port Combinations/<10 circuits/Dispatch/TN (days) 4.75 2.96 5.57 3.09 5.72 3.14 6.01 2.87 5.92 2.98 B.2.1.3.1.2Loop + Port Combinations/<10 circuits/Non-Dispatch/TN (days) 0.90 0.64 0.89 0.67 0.91 0.70 0.91 0.94 1.10 0.83 B.2.1.3.1.3Loop + Port Combinations/<10 circuits/Switch Based Orders/TN (days) 0.33 0.33 0.33 0.33 0.33 0.33 0.33 0.33 0.33 0.33 B.2.1.3.1.4Loop + Port Combinations/<10 circuits/Dispatch In/TN (days) 1.49 1.25 1.46 1.29 1.51 1.33 1.50 1.49 1.80 1.43 B.2.1.3.2.1Loop + Port Combinations/>=10 circuits/Dispatch/TN (days) 11.74 3.50 21.18 2.67 9.77 0.33 13.56 4.50 12.66 3.00 1,2,3,4,5 B.2.1.3.2.2Loop + Port Combinations/>=10 circuits/Non-Dispatch/TN (days) 4.49 3.00 6.44 6.08 7.01 4.00 7.18 1,4 B.2.1.3.2.4Loop + Port Combinations/>=10 circuits/Dispatch In/TN (days) 5.47 3.00 10.05 7.76 8.84 4.00 9.62 1,4 B.2.1.4.1.1Combo Other/<10 circuits/Dispatch/TN (days) 5.91 11.30 7.06
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-338A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-338A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-338A1.txt
  • ensure whether the programming market is fully competitive. Technical Issues In this section, we update the information provided in the 2001 Report regarding navigation devices and cable modems. Cable Modems Cable modem service allows cable subscribers to access high-speed data services, including the Internet, Internet Protocol (``IP'') telephony, and video conferencing. Cable modem deployment continues to increase, with manufacturers shipping 1.46 million cable modems in North America during the first quarter of 2002. Cable modem prices have declined, ranging in price from $69-$120, depending on features. The percentage of purchased modems has increased substantially relative to leased modems, with one analyst estimating that by 2004, approximately 32% of cable modem service customers will purchase rather than lease cable modems, up from
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-92A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-92A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-92A1.txt
  • IVDS) 5 10 1,250 1,366 27 25 1,250 Marine (Ship) 5,200 10 550,000 601,150 12 10 520,000 GMRS 3,180 5 50,000 54,650 3 5 79,500 Aviation (Aircraft) 2,700 10 175,000 191,275 7 5 135,000 Marine (Coast) 900 10 65,000 71,045 8 10 90,000 Aviation (Ground) 2,000 5 85,000 92,905 9 10 100,000 Amateur Vanity Call Signs 9,000 10 120,000 131,160 1.46 1.45 130,500 AM Class A 76 1 146,300 159,906 2,104 2,100 159,600 AM Class B 1,672 1 1,806,300 1,974,286 1,181 1,175 1,964,600 AM Class C 990 1 618,760 676,305 683 685 678,150 AM Class D 1,933 1 2,033,850 2,222,998 1,150 1,150 2,222,950 FM Classes A, B1 & C3 3,192 1 4,160,000 4,546,880 1,424 1,425 4,548,600 FM Classes B, C, C1
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-153A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-153A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-153A1.txt
  • OMB, the general public, and other Federal agencies are invited to comment on the modified information collections contained in this proceeding. Late-Filed Comments We note that there were comments filed late in this proceeding. In the interest of having as complete and accurate a record as possible, we will accept late-filed comments and waive the requirements of 47 C.F.R. � 1.46(b). Materials in Accessible Formats or call the Consumer & Governmental Affairs Bureau at (202) 418-0531 (voice), (202) 418-7365 (TTY). This Report and Order can also be downloaded in Text and ASCII formats at: http://www.fcc.gov/cgb/policy/telemarketing.html. Ordering clauses Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to the authority contained in Sections 1-4, 222, 227, and 303(r) of the Communications Act of 1934, as
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-19A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-19A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-19A1.txt
  • KARV(AM), Russellville, Arkansas; KARV-FM, Ola, Arkansas; and KLTK(AM) and KURM-FM, Southwest City, Missouri. On June 25, 2002, Family Vision requested an extension of time until July 12, 2002, to file its opposition pleading, arguing that newly hired counsel needed additional time to prepare its filing. The Commission's policy is not to grant extensions of time routinely. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.46(a). In this case, however, we find that the public interest is served by permitting the late-filing so that we may have a better understanding of the record. In Xavier, the Commission acknowledged that it can at times be difficult to distinguish between language that identifies versus that which promotes, and that it expects only that licensees exercise ``reasonable good faith
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-235A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-235A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-235A1.txt
  • set forth in Appendix C ARE EFFECTIVE on the first day of the first calendar-year quarter following approval by the Office of Management and Budget of the information collections contained herein. The Commission will publish a document in the Federal Register announcing the effective date of these rules. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that pursuant to the authority contained in section 1.46 of the Commission's rules, that the OCMC request for leave to file comments in the proceeding IS GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Commission's Consumer and Governmental Affairs Bureau, Reference Information Center, SHALL SEND a copy of this Report and Order, including the Final Regulatory Flexibility Certification, to the Chief Counsel for Advocacy of the Small Business Administration. FEDERAL
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-91A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-91A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-91A1.txt
  • the court was silent as to reconsideration petitions filed after the statutory deadline. Because the decision did not consider late-filed reconsideration petitions, WorldCom's reliance on Greater Boston is not persuasive here. Neither Meredith nor Greater Boston requires that the Commission consider late-filed reconsideration petitions. 7. WorldCom also argues that the filing of an extension request pursuant to 47 C.F.R. � 1.46(b) tolls the thirty-day statutory deadline for the filing of reconsideration petitions. Section 1.46(b) tolls the filing deadlines for "responses and comments, replies thereto" and "other filings in rulemaking proceedings" where an extension is sought more than seven days before the deadline. The list of pleadings covered by the regulation does not include petitions for reconsideration, which are filed after the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-134A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-134A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-134A1.txt
  • a 7 dB link margin. This link margin is commonly used in developing commercial mobile-satellite systems. The ratio for the number of uplink users to downlink users in Column A is (148/98) = 1.51. The ratio for the number of uplink users to downlink users in Column B is (28/20) = 1.40. The average of both of these ratios is 1.46 which is approximately equal to Globalstar's stated ratio of 1.4. Table C.1 - CDMA Uplink Link Budget Column A Column B Unit Number of Users 148 28 Frequency 1615 1615 MHz Range 1740 1740 Km Receive Noise Temperature 500 500 K Receiver Noise Density -201.6 -201.6 dBW/Hz Receiver Bandwidth 1.23 1.23 MHz Date Rate 4.8 4.8 Kbps Channel Activity Factor
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-194A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-194A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-194A1.txt
  • to send such messages, which should substantially alleviate any burdens imposed on all businesses, including those with fewer than 25 employees. Late-Filed Comments We note that there were comments filed late in this proceeding. In the interest of having as complete and accurate a record as possible, we will accept late-filed comments and waive the requirements of 47 C.F.R. � 1.46(b). Materials in Accessible Formats . Congressional Review Act The Commission will send a copy of this Order in a report to be sent to Congress and the General Accounting Office pursuant to the Congressional Review Act, see 5 U.S.C. 801(a)(1)(A). Ordering clauses Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to authority contained in Sections 1-4, 222, 227 and 303(r) of the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-201A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-201A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-201A1.txt
  • Report and Order, 14 FCC Rcd at 17427-28, paras. 87-89 (1999). See also 47 C.F.R. � 20.18(i). Intrado, Inc. (``Intrado'') filed its comments on April 28, 2004, a date past both the comment deadline of March 29, 2004 and the reply comment deadline of April 26, 2004. Although the Commission does not routinely accept late-filed comments (see 47 C.F.R. � 1.46), we find that accepting Intrado's comments will not prejudice any party to this proceeding. Therefore, on our own motion, we accept Intrado's late-filed comments with respect to reporting requirements for MSS call centers. We will decide whether to accept Intrado's late-filed comments regarding other issues (including MLTS) in separate proceedings. Those carriers (such as Globalstar and MSV) that had call
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-255A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-255A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-255A1.txt
  • from AT&T Corp. as a result of a 1982 antitrust consent decree. See id. Id. at 4. Id. at 3, 5. As of December 31, 2003, BellSouth had long distance penetration of 28 percent among its residential customers and 39 percent among its mass market business customers. See id. Id. at 6. As of December 31, 2003, BellSouth had over 1.46 million DSL subscribers, and 70% of the households in BellSouth's franchise area were qualified to receive DSL. See id. at 5. BellSouth Annual Report at 10, 14, 15. See Application, ULS File No. 0001771442, Exhibit 1, at 1 (filed June 16, 2004) (``T-Mobile-Cingular Application''); T-Mobile-Cingular Application, Exhibit 1, at 1; T-Mobile International Reports First Quarter 2004 Results of U.S. Operations,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-256A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-256A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-256A1.txt
  • the Bureau's decision is premised upon an erroneous factual finding and is contrary to Commission precedent, and that the Bureau's refusal to consider Verizon Hawaii's proferred Opposition to Sandwich Isles' Petition resulted in prejudicial procedural error. See Application for Review at 2-4. 47 C.F.R. � 1.115 (b)(2)(i). 47 C.F.R. � 1.115 (b)(2)(ii). 47 C.F.R. � 1.115 (b)(2)(v). 47 C.F.R. � 1.46(a). The case cited by the Bureau for the proposition that, ``[g]enerally, it is not Commission policy to accept late-filed comments,'' are all tariff cases. Sandwich Isles, 13 FCC Rcd at 2413, para. 16. Tariff proceedings have statutory deadlines and the filing deadlines for petitions seeking investigation, suspension, or rejection of a new or revised tariff are governed by section 1.773(a)(2)
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-105A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-105A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-105A1.txt
  • Conditions or, in the alternative, To Deny Part of the Proposed Transaction ARE DENIED except to the extent otherwise indicated in this Order. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), 214 (a), 214(c), 309, and 310(d), of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 154(i), 154(j), 214(a), 214(c), 309, 310(d), and 47 C.F.R. � 1.46 of the Commission's rules, the Motion for Extension of Time of Black Television News Channel, LLC to File Comments is DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this Memorandum Opinion and Order SHALL BE EFFECTIVE upon release, in accordance with section 1.103 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.103. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Marlene H. Dortch Secretary APPENDIX A Petitioners and
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-106A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-106A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-106A1.txt
  • reach a busy signal or are not answered. Session minutes include all the time the CA spends on a call to the relay center, i.e., from the time the call is connected to the CA, regardless of whether the called party answers the call. See generally Hamilton Petition at 10 n.21. Id. at 10. Hamilton would use a factor on 1.46 to convert session minutes to conversation minutes based on historical data available to the Commission and Fund administrator. Using this method, one conversation minute equals 1.46 session minutes. Id. The twenty-three states are: Alabama, Alaska, Arizona, California, Colorado, Connecticut, Florida, Hawaii, Iowa, Maine, Maryland, Minnesota, Montana, Nevada, New Hampshire, New Jersey, North Carolina, North Dakota, Ohio, Oregon, Tennessee, Wisconsin, and
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-150A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-150A2.txt
  • 551 355944 835723 25539 1228 0.5 71082TNKNOXVILLE 6 26 930 529 360013 835635 34112 1440 1.6 35908TNKNOXVILLE 8 30 398 551 355944 835723 29936 1352 0.8 19200TNKNOXVILLE 43 34 460 529 360013 835634 29596 1344 0.2 7651TNLEBANON 66 44 50 161 74936 360913 862246 9894 1179 0 71645TNLEXINGTON 11 471000 195 74937 354212 883610 20726 465 0 19184TNMEMPHIS 5 5 1.46 338 74601 351633 894638 25236 1416 0.3 85102TNMEMPHIS 10 3.2 306 74651 350916 894920 18964 1299 0.2 12521TNMEMPHIS 13 13 12.9 308 75055 351028 895041 26715 1453 0.6 81692TNMEMPHIS 14 14 205 379 74732 352803 901127 19928 1414 0.1 92 Appendix B Federal Communications Commission FCC 06-150 NTSC ChanChanERP (kW)HAAT (m)Antenna ID Latitude (DDMMSS) Longitude (DDDMMSS)Area (sq km) Population (thousand)%
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-62A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-62A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-62A1.txt
  • days after the reply filing deadline. Because WCA's Certificate of Service states its Opposition was served on AirTV by hand-delivery, the additional time contemplated by Section 1.4(h) of our Rules for mail-delivery is not applicable. Accordingly, Reply Comments were due March 15, 2004. Moreover, AirTV did not file a request for acceptance of a late-filed Reply as required by Section 1.46(b) of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.46(b). Thus, we will refer to this pleading, as well as the April 23, 2004, and May 18, 2004, filings by WCA, as Ex Parte Comments. See AirTV Petition at 3-5, 7. Id. at 5-6. Id. at 4-6. See AirTV Petition, Attachment 1, Feasibility of Co-Frequency Sharing Between BSS Systems and Terrestrial Systems
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-85A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-85A1.txt
  • electronically in ECFS on Dec. 13, 2005) ("Microcom Reply"). We note that the Microcom Reply is a late-filed pleading, as the reply due date in the proceeding was December 6, 2005. Microcom did not include a motion for extension of time with the Microcom Reply. It is Commission policy not to routinely grant extensions of time. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.46(a). In this instance, even considering the late-filed Microcom Reply, we would not grant Microcom's request for conditions, for the reasons stated below in Section V.D.2. 49 Constellation, LLC, Carlyle PanAmSat I, LLC, Carlyle PanAmSat II, LLC, PEP PAS, LLC, and PEOP PAS, LLC, Transferors, and Intelsat Holdings, Ltd., Transferee, Applications for Approval of Transfer of Control, Order Adopting Protective Order,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-138A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-138A2.txt
  • 34 460 529 360013 835634 29596 1344 0.2 7651TNLEBANON 66 44 50 161 74936 360913 862246 9894 1179 0 Appendix B Federal Communications Commission FCC 07-138 NTSC ChanChanERP (kW)HAAT (m)Antenna ID Latitude (DDMMSS) Longitude (DDDMMSS) Area (sq km)Population (thousand)% Interference Received State and City Facility ID DTV 71645TNLEXINGTON 11 471000 195 74937 354212 883610 20726 465 0 19184TNMEMPHIS 5 5 1.46 338 74601 351633 894638 24916 1412 0.6 85102TNMEMPHIS 10 3.2 306 74651 350916 894920 18964 1299 0.2 12521TNMEMPHIS 13 13 12.9 308 75055 351028 895041 26715 1453 0.6 81692TNMEMPHIS 14 23 255 379 80188 352803 901127 19956 1415 0.1 11907TNMEMPHIS 24 251000 340 351633 894638 32105 1643 1.3 66174TNMEMPHIS 3 281000 305 74938 351052 894956 30178 1518 0.3 42061TNMEMPHIS 10
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-219A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-219A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-219A1.txt
  • employees. The Commission has certified 25 OVS operators, with some now providing service. Broadband service providers (BSPs) are currently the only significant holders of OVS certifications or local OVS franchises, even though OVS is one of four statutorily-recognized options for local exchange carriers (LECs) to offer video programming services. As of June 2007, BSPs served approximately 1.4 million subscribers, representing 1.46 percent of all MVPD households. Among BSPs, however, those operating under the OVS framework are in the minority, with approximately eight percent operating with an OVS certification. BSPs include companies such as RCN, Champion Broadband, Knology, and SureWest Communications. RCN received approval to operate OVS systems in New York City, Boston, Washington, D.C. and other areas. The Commission does not
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-113A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-113A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-113A1.txt
  • 201, 202, 203, 251, 254, and section 1.2 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.2, the Petition for Declaratory Ruling on Issues Contained in GTE v. Thorpe is DENIED, as discussed herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to sections 4(i) and 4(j) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 154(i) and (j), and section 1.46 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.46, the Motion for Extension of Time to File a Reply is GRANTED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Marlene H. Dortch Secretary See Petition for Declaratory Ruling on Issues Contained in ``Thorpe v. GTE'', United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida, Case No. 8:00-CV-1231-T-17EAJ (filed Aug. 8, 2002) (Petition); see also id.,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-13A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-13A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-13A1.txt
  • C.F.R. � 1.115(c). Moreover, that argument largely seeks a fundamental change to the ``period of construction'' rule in 47 C.F.R. � 73.3598, rather than making a legal claim tailored to the instant proceeding. Opposition to Application for Review at 1. See JNE Reply at 2. Opposition to Petition for Reconsideration at 2. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.106(g). 47 C.F.R. � 1.46(c). 47 C.F.R. � 73.3598(b). Id. We reiterate that the tolling provision of 47 C.F.R. � 73.3598 is inapplicable if there have already been three unencumbered years to construct a station. See Texas Grace Communications, Inc., Memorandum Opinion and Order, 20 FCC Rcd 4820, 4824 (2005) (permittee not eligible for tolling because it previously had received three unencumbered years). The KSDG(AM)
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-144A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-144A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-144A1.txt
  • (Mar. 2, 2006); Reply (Mar. 14, 2006). See 47 C.F.R. �� 1.115(d) and 1.4(b). See Crystal Broadcast Partners, Memorandum Opinion and Order, 11 FCC Rcd 4680, 4681 (1996) (citing MTD, Inc., Memorandum Opinion and Order, 6 FCC Rcd 34, 35 n.2 (1991) and Hancock Communications, Inc., Memorandum Opinion and Order, 10 FCC Rcd 13068, 13069 (1995)). See 47 C.F.R. � 1.46(c). Id. at � 1.46(a). See 47 C.F.R. � 1.46. See also 47 C.F.R. �� 1.115(d) and 1.4(b). See Hillebrand Broadcasting, Inc., Order, 1 FCC Rcd 419, 420 n.6 (1986). Prosecution of an application includes timely compliance with both procedural and substantive rules. Id. at 419. See 47 C.F.R. � 73.3573. Compare MTD, Inc., Memorandum Opinion and Order, 6 FCC Rcd
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-229A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-229A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-229A1.txt
  • June 2, 2003, reply. Arkansas also asserts that its due process rights were violated because: (1) the staff did not provide notice that its May 21, 2003, motion for an extension of time to file a late reply would be denied; and (2) it did not receive the two business days from denial to file pursuant to 47 C.F.R. � 1.46(b). Ideally, of course, the staff would have been aware of the motion prior to issuing the Staff Decision and thus would have addressed the extension issue therein. We find, however, that Arkansas was not prejudiced under the circumstances. Section 1.46(b) which pertains to rulemaking proceedings is inapplicable here. The untimely reply was properly not considered in the Staff Decision. See
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-53A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-53A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-53A1.txt
  • Commission review of those decisions. See Opposition to Request for Leave at 3. The May Decision was a staff letter of the type not generally released or placed on a public notice, but rather mailed to parties to the proceeding. New World was not a party. See Broadcast Applications, Public Notice, Report No. 25749 (June 3, 2004). 47 C.F.R. � 1.46(c). See June Decision at 2. See 47 C.F.R. � 73.3571(a)(1) (2004). WDMV(AM)'s operations from the Damascus Site would not provide the community of Walkersville with the requisite city grade signal coverage. Birach failed to take advantage of its opportunity to file a major change application for WDMV(AM) during the AM filing window that opened on January 26, 2004. See Revision
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-09-10A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-09-10A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-09-10A1.txt
  • we expect to establish for the additional information for 2008. Comment deadlines for 2009 will be announced when the Commission issues its Supplemental NOI. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to Sections 4(i), 4(j), 403 and 628(g) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S. C. �� 154(i), 154(j), 403, and 548(g), and Sections 0.061, 0.204, 0.283, and 1.46 of the rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.061, 0.204, 0.283, and 1.46, the deadlines for responding to the Notice of Inquiry for the 14th Annual Report are extended, sua sponte, until April 28, 2009, for initial comments and May 28, 2009, for reply comments. For additional information, please contact Marcia Glauberman or Dana Scherer, Industry Analysis Division, Media Bureau, at (202)
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-11A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-11A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-11A1.txt
  • has approved approximately 120 OVS certifications with some OVS operators now providing service. Broadband service providers (BSPs) are currently the only significant holders of OVS certifications or local OVS franchises, even though OVS is one of four statutorily-recognized options for local exchange carriers (LECs) to offer video programming services. As of June 2006, BSPs served approximately 1.4 million subscribers, representing 1.46 percent of all MVPD households. Among BSPs, however, those operating under the OVS framework are in the minority. The Commission does not have financial information regarding the entities authorized to provide OVS, some of which may not yet be operational. We thus believe that at least some of the OVS operators may qualify as small entities. Cable System Operators (Rate
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-17A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-17A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-17A1.txt
  • has approved approximately 120 OVS certifications with some OVS operators now providing service. Broadband service providers (BSPs) are currently the only significant holders of OVS certifications or local OVS franchises, even though OVS is one of four statutorily-recognized options for local exchange carriers (LECs) to offer video programming services. As of June 2006, BSPs served approximately 1.4 million subscribers, representing 1.46 percent of all MVPD households. Among BSPs, however, those operating under the OVS framework are in the minority. The Commission does not have financial information regarding the entities authorized to provide OVS, some of which may not yet be operational. We thus believe that at least some of the OVS operators may qualify as small entities. Cable System Operators (Rate
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-61A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-61A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-61A1.txt
  • has approved approximately 120 OVS certifications with some OVS operators now providing service. Broadband service providers (BSPs) are currently the only significant holders of OVS certifications or local OVS franchises, even though OVS is one of four statutorily-recognized options for local exchange carriers (LECs) to offer video programming services. As of June 2006, BSPs served approximately 1.4 million subscribers, representing 1.46 percent of all MVPD households. Among BSPs, however, those operating under the OVS framework are in the minority. The Commission does not have financial information regarding the entities authorized to provide OVS, some of which may not yet be operational. We thus believe that at least some of the OVS operators may qualify as small entities. Cable System Operators (Rate
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-9A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-9A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-9A1.txt
  • deny Petitioners' alternative request, see Suggestion at 6, that we grant leave to file the amended application for review out of time. See Regionet, 17 FCC Rcd at 21265 � 6 (``[E]lectronic filers who wait until the last minute of the last day of the filing period to submit a pleading should not routinely expect a waiver.''); 47 C.F.R. � 1.46(a) (``extensions of time shall not be routinely granted''). None of the other procedural defects proffered by Mobex merits dismissing the application for review. See Opposition at 4-6. As at least one of the Petitioners clearly has standing, we need not address whether any do not. See Emmis Communications Corp., Order on Reconsideration, 21 FCC Rcd 12219, 12220 � 3 (2006).
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-9A1_Rcd.pdf
  • deny Petitioners' alternative request, see Suggestion at 6, that we grant leave to file the amended application for review out of time. See Regionet, 17 FCC Rcd at 21265 � 6 ("[E]lectronic filers who wait until the last minute of the last day of the filing period to submit a pleading should not routinely expect a waiver."); 47 C.F.R. � 1.46(a) ("extensions of time shall not be routinely granted"). 33None of the other procedural defects proffered by Mobex merits dismissing the application for review. See Opposition at 4-6. As at least one of the Petitioners clearly has standing, we need not address whether any do not. SeeEmmis Communications Corp., Order on Reconsideration, 21 FCC Rcd 12219, 12220 � 3 (2006). Also,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-12A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-12A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-12A1.txt
  • has approved approximately 120 OVS certifications with some OVS operators now providing service. Broadband service providers (BSPs) are currently the only significant holders of OVS certifications or local OVS franchises, even though OVS is one of four statutorily-recognized options for local exchange carriers (LECs) to offer video programming services. As of June 2006, BSPs served approximately 1.4 million subscribers, representing 1.46 percent of all MVPD households. Among BSPs, however, those operating under the OVS framework are in the minority. The Commission does not have financial information regarding the entities authorized to provide OVS, some of which may not yet be operational. We thus believe that at least some of the OVS operators may qualify as small entities. Cable System Operators (Rate
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-153A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-153A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-153A1.txt
  • has approved approximately 120 OVS certifications with some OVS operators now providing service. Broadband service providers (BSPs) are currently the only significant holders of OVS certifications or local OVS franchises, even though OVS is one of four statutorily-recognized options for local exchange carriers (LECs) to offer video programming services. As of June 2006, BSPs served approximately 1.4 million subscribers, representing 1.46 percent of all MVPD households. Among BSPs, however, those operating under the OVS framework are in the minority. The Commission does not have financial information regarding the entities authorized to provide OVS, some of which may not yet be operational. We thus believe that at least some of the OVS operators may qualify as small entities. Cable System Operators (Rate
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-161A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-161A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-161A1.txt
  • (-0.36) (-0.91) (0.38) (-0.54) (0.86) (2.53) (1.03) (-1. 37) (-0.31) (-0.05) Census_Blocs_nu 0.134* 0.200* 0.228 0.297 0.0559 0.113 -0.129 0.135 0.17 6 0.0630 0.0840 -0.259 (2.44) (2.37) (1.27) (1.53) (0.58) (1.05) (-0.77) (0.87) (1.69) (0.53) (0.91) (-1.01) Census_Blocs_nu -0.252** -0.318** -0.341 -0.388 0.0386 -0.0340 -0.0735 - 0.325 -0.251 -0.246 -0.297 -0.0890 (-2.72) (-2.89) (-0.84) (-0.90) (0.22) (-0.22) (-0.30) (-1.38) (-1.29) (-1.46) (-1.58) (-0.22) Census_Blocs_nu 0.160 -0.123 -0.492 -0.0194 -0.0713 0.303 0.000850 0.228 0.0383 -0.454 0.563*** 1.037 (1.48) (-0.50) (-0.66) (-0.02) (-0.19) (1.64) (0.00) (0.48) (0.18) (-1. 35) (3.42) (1.34) Constant 10.38*** 8.933*** 4.261*** 2.419*** 7.263*** 7.263*** 6.055*** 6.929*** 7.269*** 6.547*** 5.822*** 7.220*** (50.38) (36.72) (6.26) (3.56) (19.34) (21.60) (10.77) (12.50) (19.23) ( 17.90) (17.85) (8.58) N 720 720 720 720 720
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-73A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-73A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-73A1.txt
  • Texas, et al., Memorandum Opinion and Order, 19 FCC Rcd 7159 (MB 2004) (``Quanah MO&O''). J&J/M&M filed a Motion for Extension of Time to file an Opposition to Application for Review. The Joint Petitioners opposed these Motions. J&J/M&M has failed to show good cause for its late filing. We deny the Motion and dismiss the Opposition. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.46(a). Quanah, Texas, Notice of Proposed Rule Making, 15 FCC Rcd 15809 (MMB 2000) (``Quanah Notice''). Nation Wide Radio Stations withdrew its expression of interest in this allotment, and in accordance with Section 1.420(j) of the Rules, this proposal was dismissed in Quanah, Texas, Report and Order, 18 FCC Rcd 9495 (MB 2003) (``Quanah Report and Order''). Counterproposal at 36. (``The
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-76A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-76A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-76A1.txt
  • C, 19 FCC Rcd 6505 (Staff Recommendations). Kelley, Drye & Warren, Reply Comments of Kelley, Drye & Warren (filed Aug. 24, 2004) (KDW Reply). The reply was accompanied by a Motion for Leave to File Reply Comments One Day Late. It is the policy of the Commission that motions for extension of time shall not be granted routinely. See Section 1.46 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R � 1.46. However, because the Commission wishes the most complete record possible, and no one would be harmed by accepting the late-filed comments, we grant KDW's motion. See, e.g., Letter from Melissa E. Newman, Vice President-Federal Regulatory, Qwest Communications Corporation, to Marlene H. Dortch, Secretary, Federal Communications Commission, dated March 11, 2005; letter from
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-76A1_Rcd.pdf
  • C, 19 FCC Rcd 6505 (Staff Recommendations). 41Kelley, Drye & Warren, Reply Comments of Kelley, Drye & Warren (filed Aug. 24, 2004) (KDW Reply). The reply was accompanied by a Motion for Leave to File Reply Comments One Day Late. It is the policy of the Commission that motions for extension of time shall not be granted routinely. See Section 1.46 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R � 1.46. However, because the Commission wishes the most complete record possible, and no one would be harmed by accepting the late-filed comments, we grant KDW's motion. 42See, e.g., Letter from Melissa E. Newman, Vice President-Federal Regulatory, Qwest Communications Corporation, to Marlene H. Dortch, Secretary, Federal Communications Commission, dated March 11, 2005; letter from
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-12-21A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-12-21A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-12-21A1.txt
  • note that there were comments filed late in this proceeding. In the interest of having as complete and accurate a record as possible, and because we would be free to consider the substance of those filings as part of the record in this proceeding in any event, we will accept late-filed comments and waive the requirements of 47 C.F.R. � 1.46(b), and have considered them in this Order. Materials in Accessible Formats or call the Consumer & Governmental Affairs Bureau at (202) 418-0531 (voice), (202) 418-7365 (TTY). This Report and Order can also be downloaded in Text and ASCII formats at: http://www.fcc.gov/cgb/policy/telemarketing.html. Ordering clauses Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in Sections 1-4, 222, 227, and 303(r) of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-12-9A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-12-9A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-12-9A1.txt
  • no justification for shortening the response time or denying extensions, and more time rather than less may be needed in light of the complicated chain of entities that could be involved in determining why any particular program might appear online without captions.''). See NPRM, 26 FCC Rcd at 13757, 13771, � 45 and App. A. See 47 C.F.R. �� 1.3, 1.46; see also 47 U.S.C. � 154(j) (``The Commission may conduct its proceedings in such manner as will best conduce to the proper dispatch of business and to the ends of justice.''). Motions for extension of time, however, are not routinely granted, 47 C.F.R. � 1.46(a), and waivers are granted only for good cause, 47 C.F.R. � 1.3. See, e.g., NCTA
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-96-325A1.pdf
  • certification of service as required by � 1.1404(b) of this subpart. The named respondent may file an answer within 7 days of the date the Petition for Temporary Stay was filed. No further filings under this section will be considered unless requested or authorized by the Commission and no extensions of time will be granted unless justified pursuant to � 1.46. 7. Section 1.1404 is amended by revising paragraphs (b) and (c) and by adding new paragraph (k) to read as follows: � 1.1404 Complaint. * * * * * (b) The complaint shall be accompanied by a certification of service on the named respondent, and each of the Federal, State, and local governmental agencies that regulate any aspect of the
• http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Cable/Orders/1998/da982342.pdf http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Cable/Orders/1998/da982342.txt http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Cable/Orders/1998/da982342.wp
  • a better-informed decision by the Commission in a matter that will materially affect members of the public and the industry groups that MSTV represents. We therefore will extend the deadline for the reply comments by 28 days and designate December 22, 1998 as the deadline for the reply comments in this proceeding. 6. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to Section 1.46 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. Section 1.46, that the Motion for Extension of Time to File Reply Comments filed by the Office of Communication, Inc., of the United Church of Christ, Media Access Project, the Benton Foundation, the Center for Media Education, and the Civil Rights Forum IS GRANTED. 7. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to Section 1.46 of
• http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1998/da980063.html http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1998/da980063.txt http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1998/da980063.wp
  • must be filed on or before February 6, 1998. All other requirements and procedures established in the Commission's January 5, 1998 Public Notice concerning the report to Congress remain in effect. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Lisa Gelb Chief, Universal Service Branch Accounting and Audits Division Common Carrier Bureau _____________________ 1. See Public Notice, DA 98-2 (January 5, 1998). 2. 47 C.F.R. 1.46(a). References 1. http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1998/da980063.txt 2. http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1998/da980063.wp 3. http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1998/da980063.html#N_1_ 4. http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1998/da980063.html#N_2_
• http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/da992448.doc http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/da992448.txt
  • by communications services and equipment not covered by the rules and policies adopted in the Report and Order. The current comment and reply comment deadlines for the Further Notice of Inquiry (FNOI) are November 14, 1999, and December 14, 1999, respectively. 2. On October 22, 1999, the Voice on the Net Coalition (VON Coalition) filed a motion pursuant to section 1.46 of the Commission's rules, requesting an extension of 60 days for each deadline, or until January 13, 2000 and February 14, 2000, respectively. Von Coalition states that the requested extension will provide parties additional time in which to meet to more clearly frame the issues and establish the basis for a continuing dialogue between industry representatives and advocates for the
• http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/MB/Orders/2002/da020946.pdf
  • 20554 In the Matter of Rules and Policies Concerning Multiple Ownership of Radio Broadcast Stations in Local Markets Definition of Radio Markets ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) MM Docket No. 01-317 MM Docket No. 00-244 ORDER Adopted: April 23, 2002 Released: April 23, 2002 By the Chief, Media Bureau: 1. On April 17, 2002, pursuant to section 1.46 of the Commission's Rules,1 the Office of Communication of the United Church of Christ ("UCC") filed a "Motion for Extension of Reply Comment Deadline" in this proceeding. Previously, on January 23, 2002, and on March 8, 2002, we granted motions and extended our comment and reply comment deadlines.2 The current deadline to file reply comments is April 24, 2002. UCC
• http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/OGC/Orders/1998/fcc98056.pdf http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/OGC/Orders/1998/fcc98056.wp
  • official custodian of the Commission's documents and shall have authority to appoint a deputy or deputies for the purposes of custody and certification of documents located in Gettysburg, Pennsylvania or other established locations. The Secretary is delegated authority to rule on requests for extensions of time based on operational problems associated with the Commission's electronic comment filing system. See � 1.46. 3. Section 0.401 is amended by adding (a)(1)(iii) to read as follows: � 0.401 Location of Commission Offices. * * * * * (iii) Electronic filings, where permitted, must be transmitted as specified by the Commission or relevant Bureau or Office. * * * * * Part 1 of Title 47 of the Code of Federal Regulations is amended as
• http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireline_Competition/Orders/2002/da020991.pdf http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireline_Competition/Orders/2002/da020991.txt
  • the deadline for filing reply comments in this proceeding. Because of the complexity and volume of the issues raised in the initial comments filed in this proceeding, we find it appropriate to extend the deadline for reply comments to June 5, 2002, so that parties can more thoroughly address all of the issues raised by commenters. 1 47 C.F.R. � 1.46(a). Federal Communications Commission DA 02-991 2 B. Revised Comment Filing Procedures 3. We request that interested parties that choose to file by paper file an original and nineteen copies of each. Previously we had requested an original and four copies. Parties may also continue to file using the Commission's Electronic Comment Filing System (ECFS). All other comment filing procedures previously
• http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireline_Competition/Orders/2002/fcc02118.pdf
  • 0 0 1.69 0 0 0 2.04 PR-4-08-2341 % Missed Appt. � Customer � Late Order Conf. 0 0 0 0 0 PR-6 � Installation Quality PR-6-01-2341 % Install. Troubles Reported within 30 Days 1.94 2.76 1.41 2.06 1.3 1.18 1.04 0 0.61 1 PR-6-03-2341 % Install. Troubles Reported w/in 30 Days - FOK/TOK/CPE 4.07 1.66 3.72 3.09 2.44 0.59 1.46 2.67 PR-8 � Open Orders in a Hold Status PR-8-01-2341 Open Orders in a Hold Status > 30 Days 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PR-8-02-2341 Open Orders in a Hold Status > 90 Days 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Federal Communications Commission FCC 02-118 C-14 Metric Metric September October November
• http://transition.fcc.gov/Speeches/Kennard/Statements/2001/CETVReport97-99.doc
  • presents various statistics for each of the ten station-groups where j = 1,2,...,10. TABLE A1 core hours preemption n(j) N(j) p(j) fpcf(j) m(j) v(j) sm(j) m(j) v(j) sm(j) ABC 20 186 .154 0.89 3.82 0.281 0.11 9.70 43.972 1.40 CBS 20 184 .153 0.89 3.06 0.023 0.03 7.84 19.882 0.94 NBC 20 188 .156 0.89 3.32 0.274 0.11 12.36 47.712 1.46 FOX 10 163 .135 0.94 4.48 1.013 0.31 0.84 0.811 0.27 UPN 10 80 .066 0.88 5.25 5.107 0.67 0.54 0.510 0.21 WB 10 63 .052 0.84 4.34 1.423 0.35 0.55 0.287 0.16 PAX 10 65 .054 0.85 3.39 0.381 0.18 1.06 3.908 0.58 UNI/TEL 10 38 .032 0.74 3.39 0.659 0.22 2.26 5.526 0.64 Religious 10 41 .034 0.76
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2002/DA-02-3501A1.html
  • questions, please contact Hugh L. Boyle at (202) 418-7147 or Mika Savir at (202) 418-0384. Sincerely, Maureen F. Del Duca Deputy Chief Investigations and Hearings Division Enforcement Bureau _________________________ 1 See Public Notice, ``Enforcement Bureau Seeks Comments on SBC Communications Section 272 Compliance Biennial Audit Report in CC Docket No. 96-150,'' DA 02-2925, rel. Oct. 31, 2002. 2 47 C.F.R. 1.46(a). References 1. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3501A1.pdf 2. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3501A1.doc
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2003/FCC-03-19A1.html
  • KARV(AM), Russellville, Arkansas; KARV-FM, Ola, Arkansas; and KLTK(AM) and KURM-FM, Southwest City, Missouri. 2 On June 25, 2002, Family Vision requested an extension of time until July 12, 2002, to file its opposition pleading, arguing that newly hired counsel needed additional time to prepare its filing. The Commission's policy is not to grant extensions of time routinely. See 47 C.F.R. 1.46(a). In this case, however, we find that the public interest is served by permitting the late-filing so that we may have a better understanding of the record. 3 In Xavier, the Commission acknowledged that it can at times be difficult to distinguish between language that identifies versus that which promotes, and that it expects only that licensees exercise ``reasonable good
• http://transition.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/FCC-11-73A1.doc http://transition.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/FCC-11-73A1.pdf
  • Texas, et al., Memorandum Opinion and Order, 19 FCC Rcd 7159 (MB 2004) (``Quanah MO&O''). J&J/M&M filed a Motion for Extension of Time to file an Opposition to Application for Review. The Joint Petitioners opposed these Motions. J&J/M&M has failed to show good cause for its late filing. We deny the Motion and dismiss the Opposition. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.46(a). Quanah, Texas, Notice of Proposed Rule Making, 15 FCC Rcd 15809 (MMB 2000) (``Quanah Notice''). Nation Wide Radio Stations withdrew its expression of interest in this allotment, and in accordance with Section 1.420(j) of the Rules, this proposal was dismissed in Quanah, Texas, Report and Order, 18 FCC Rcd 9495 (MB 2003) (``Quanah Report and Order''). Counterproposal at 36. (``The
• http://transition.fcc.gov/ownership/materials/already-released/consumer090002.pdf
  • See text for explanation. 46 Table 1: Television Outlets, 1994-2000 year N uhf vhf uhf+vhf network indep. public net+ind+pub 1994207 2.29 2.63 2.46 1995207 2.96 2.29 5.25 2.72 2.52 1.71 6.96 1996207 3.09 2.34 5.43 4.20 1.23 1.71 7.14 1997207 3.19 2.35 5.54 4.29 1.25 1.71 7.25 1998207 3.37 2.37 5.74 4.74 1.40 1.72 7.87 1999207 3.54 2.37 5.91 4.94 1.46 2000207 3.65 2.39 6.04 5.02 1.57 1.73 8.32 linked sample year N uhf vhf uhf+vhf network indep. public net+ind+pub 1994 2.64 2.88 3.33 1995143 3.76 2.63 6.38 3.01 3.37 2.04 8.42 1996143 3.88 2.68 6.56 4.85 1.71 2.03 8.59 1997143 3.98 2.69 6.67 4.95 1.72 2.03 8.71 1998143 4.19 2.71 6.90 5.26 1.90 2.05 9.21 1999143 4.40 2.71 7.11 5.43
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/05/releases/da972707.pdf http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/05/releases/da972707.txt http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/05/releases/da972707.wp
  • Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Federal Communications Commission DA 97-2707 See 47 C.F.R. �� 1.429(f). 1 47 C.F.R. � 1.46(a). 2 Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C. 20554 In the Matter of )) Amendment of the Commission's ) WT Docket No. 97-82 Rules Regarding Installment Payment ) Financing For Personal Communications ) Services (PCS) Licensees ) ORDER Adopted: December 24, 1997 Released: December 24, 1997 By the Chief, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau: 1. On September 25, 1997, the Commission adopted
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/10/releases/da972707.pdf http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/10/releases/da972707.txt http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/10/releases/da972707.wp
  • Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Federal Communications Commission DA 97-2707 See 47 C.F.R. �� 1.429(f). 1 47 C.F.R. � 1.46(a). 2 Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C. 20554 In the Matter of )) Amendment of the Commission's ) WT Docket No. 97-82 Rules Regarding Installment Payment ) Financing For Personal Communications ) Services (PCS) Licensees ) ORDER Adopted: December 24, 1997 Released: December 24, 1997 By the Chief, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau: 1. On September 25, 1997, the Commission adopted
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/11/releases/da972707.pdf http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/11/releases/da972707.txt http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/11/releases/da972707.wp
  • Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Federal Communications Commission DA 97-2707 See 47 C.F.R. �� 1.429(f). 1 47 C.F.R. � 1.46(a). 2 Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C. 20554 In the Matter of )) Amendment of the Commission's ) WT Docket No. 97-82 Rules Regarding Installment Payment ) Financing For Personal Communications ) Services (PCS) Licensees ) ORDER Adopted: December 24, 1997 Released: December 24, 1997 By the Chief, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau: 1. On September 25, 1997, the Commission adopted
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/20/releases/fc980151.pdf http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/20/releases/fc980151.txt http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/20/releases/fc980151.wp
  • be announced by Public Notice. 85. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Commission's Office of Public Affairs, Reference Operations Division, SHALL SEND a copy of this Third Report and Order and Memorandum Opinion and Order, including the Final Regulatory Flexibility Analysis, to the Chief Counsel for Advocacy of the Small Business Administration. 86. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to Section 1.46(b) of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.46(b), that the Motion to Accept Late-Filed Comments filed by MariTEL Corporation IS GRANTED. 87. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Orion Telecom's Petition to Set Aside the Coast Guard Petition for Rule Making IS DENIED. 88. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Petition for Reconsideration filed by MariTEL Corporation IS DENIED. F. Contact
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/31/releases/da000273.doc http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/31/releases/da000273.pdf http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/31/releases/da000273.txt
  • Incorporated's Petition for Declaratory Ruling Seeking 700 MHz Band License Pursuant to Ruling of U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals,'' Public Notice, DA 00-219 (rel. February 4, 2000). Id. Bell Atlantic Mobile, Inc., Emergency Motion for Extension of Time, filed February 9, 2000. U S WEST Wireless LLC, Emergency Motion for Extension of Time, filed February 10, 2000. 47 C.F.R. � 1.46. See ``Wireless Telecommunications Bureau Seeks Comment on QUALCOMM Incorporated's Petition for Declaratory Ruling Seeking 700 MHz Band License Pursuant to Ruling of U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals,'' DA 00-219 (rel. February 4, 2000). PUBLIC NOTICE Federal Communications Commission 445 12th St., S.W. Washington, D.C. 20554 News Media Information 202 / 418-0500 Fax-On-Demand 202 / 418-2830 TTY 202 / 418-2555 Internet:
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/35/releases/da000271.doc http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/35/releases/da000271.pdf http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/35/releases/da000271.txt
  • Deadline for Comments to SBC Communications Inc.'s and Nextel Communications, Inc.s' Request for Waiver of the Commission's Rules, DA 00-191, filed by NTCA on February 4, 2000; Request for Additional Time to File Comments, DA 00-191, filed by Advocacy on February 7, 2000; Request for Extension of Time, DA 00-191, filed by RCA on February 9, 2000. 47 C.F.R. � 1.46. To the extent that the Bankruptcy Court's February 7, 2000 order may have constrained the Commission in acting on SBC's and Nextel's petitions, the Second Circuit Court of Appeals' order of February 10, 2000 clarifies that the Commission may take this action. See ``Wireless Telecommunications Bureau Seeks Comment on Nextel Communications, Inc.'s Petition Regarding PCS C and F Block Spectrum;
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/41/releases/da001421.doc http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/41/releases/da001421.pdf http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/41/releases/da001421.txt
  • weeks. 4. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that the Motion of the Personal Communications Industry Association for Extension of Time filed on June 19, 2000, IS GRANTED IN PART. Interested parties may file comments on or before July 19, 2000, and reply comments on or before August 3, 2000. 5. This action is taken pursuant to the authority provided in Section 1.46 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.46, and under delegated authority pursuant to Sections 0.131 and 0.331 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.131, 0.331. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Margaret Wiener Deputy Chief, Auctions and Industry Analysis Division Wireless Telecommunications Bureau See Amendment of the Commission's Rules to Establish New Personal Communications Services, Narrowband PCS, GEN Docket No. 90-314,
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/conferences/combin2001/papers/vsmith.pdf
  • Level of Synergy (Medium) -3.04 0.25 Level of Synergy (High) -0.88 0.51 Number of Bidders -1.69 0.48 Overlap 3.31 0.05 CE Exists -3.25 0.11 Table 10: Normalized (Mean, Median) Revenue: Additive Environment Treatments Nonflexible Flexible Equal 1.41, 1.31 1.45, 1.45 Unequal 1.39, 1.39 1.31, 1.29 Table 11: Linear Model Parameter Estimates for Normalized Revenue: Additive Environment Variable Estimate p-value Intercept 1.46 0.0 Flexible -0.01 0.84 Unequal 0.04 0.21 Environment Pairing -0.01 0.91 Number of Bidders -0.03 0.44 Table 12: Normalized Revenue (Mean, Median): Superadditive Environment Treatments Nonflexible Flexible Equal 0.92, 0.89 0.98, 0.91 Unequal 0.72, 0.78 0.84, 0.86 Table 13: Linear Model Parameter Estimates for Normalized Revenue: Superadditive Environment Variable Estimate P-Value Intercept 1.01 0.00 Flexible 0.05 0.07 Unequal 0.09 0.001
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/general/releases/da990950.pdf http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/general/releases/da990950.txt http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/general/releases/da990950.wp
  • preparing comprehensive responses to both the Notice, and the recently released Second Memorandum Opinion and Order in the refarming proceeding, is an extremely difficult task. Specifically, LMCC contends that an extension 3 4 Federal Communications Commission DA 99-950 Opinion and Order"). See Land Mobile Communications Council, Request for Extension of Time to File Comments at 2. 4 47 C.F.R. � 1.46(b). 5 2 is warranted due to the number of questions raised in the Notice and the impact the answers to these questions will have on the private wireless industry. 3. The Commission does not routinely grant extensions of time. Upon review, however, we 5 agree that an extension will afford parties the necessary time to coordinate and file comments that
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/rss/index.htm?job=ainf&id=79
  • 2 Permits with PWBs*: 83 FCC Held Permits: 39 Eligible Bidders: 61 (of 77 qualified bidders) * PWBs = Provisionally Winning Bidders http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/default.htm?job=auction_summary&id=79T ue, 08 Sep 2009 15:50:03 GMT Summary Permits: 122 construction permits for FM Broadcast Qualified Bidders: 77 Rounds Completed: 17 Bidding Days: 5 Results for Round 17 Gross Revenue: $5,367,800.00 - Dollar Change: $77,200.00 - % Change: 1.46 Net Revenue: $4,522,960.00 - Dollar Change: $150,055.00 - % Change: 3.43 New Bids: 22 Withdrawn Bids: 0 Proactive Waivers: 2 Bidders that Reduced Eligibility: 2 Permits with PWBs*: 83 FCC Held Permits: 39 Eligible Bidders: 61 (of 77 qualified bidders) * PWBs = Provisionally Winning Bidders http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/default.htm?job=auction_summary&id=79T ue, 08 Sep 2009 17:05:02 GMT Summary Permits: 122 construction permits for FM
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/services/brsebs/releases/fcc97360.doc http://wireless.fcc.gov/services/brsebs/releases/fcc97360.pdf http://wireless.fcc.gov/services/brsebs/releases/fcc97360.txt
  • applicable to the Multipoint Distribution Service, the Instructional Fixed Television Service and the Private Operational-Fixed Microwave Service (OFS), 98 FCC 2d 68, 93 (1984). See Comments of CTN, Dallas Community College District, et al. ("Dallas"), Northeastern University ("Northeastern"), Pace, ComSpec Corporation ("ComSpec"), Arizona State Board of Regents, et al. ("Arizona") and the Archdiocese of Los Angeles ("Archdiocese"). 47 C.F.R. � 1.46. Citing Amendment of Parts 1, 21, 22, 74, and 94 of the Commission's Rules to Establish Service and Technical Rules for Government and non-Government Fixed Service Usage of the Frequency Bands 932-935 MHz and 941-944 MHz, 4 FCC Rcd 2012, 2014 (1989). We note that the case cited by Petitioners does not deal with an automatic grant system, but does
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/uls/releases/da980827.doc http://wireless.fcc.gov/uls/releases/da980827.pdf
  • in this proceeding, commenters may use the electronic filing interface on the Commission's World Wide Web site at . Further information on the process of submitting comments electronically is available at that location and at . Orderin g Clauses 6. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, that pursuant to sections 4(i), and 5 of the 154(i); 155, authority delegated by section 0.331 1.46, the Motion For An Extension Of Time, filed by the Federal Communications Bar Association on April 29, 1998, IS GRANTED. Comments are due on or before May 22, 1998. Reply comments are due on or before June 8, 1998. 7. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to section 4(i) and 5 of the Communications Act 154(i); 155, authority delegated by section
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/uls/releases/da981068.doc http://wireless.fcc.gov/uls/releases/da981068.pdf
  • to be reasonable and therefore extend the filing date for reply comments. Therefore, we grant the FCBA's request. Ordering Clauses . Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, that pursuant to sections 4(i), and 5 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 154(i), 155, authority delegated by section 0.331 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 0.331, and section 1.46 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.46, the Motion for Extension of Time, filed by the Federal Communications Bar Association on June 2, 1998, IS GRANTED. Reply comments are due on or before June 16, 1998. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Steven E. Weingarten Chief, Commercial Wireless Division The FCBA is a non-profit, non-stock corporation organized under the laws of the
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Cable/Orders/1998/da982342.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Cable/Orders/1998/da982342.txt http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Cable/Orders/1998/da982342.wp
  • a better-informed decision by the Commission in a matter that will materially affect members of the public and the industry groups that MSTV represents. We therefore will extend the deadline for the reply comments by 28 days and designate December 22, 1998 as the deadline for the reply comments in this proceeding. 6. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to Section 1.46 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. Section 1.46, that the Motion for Extension of Time to File Reply Comments filed by the Office of Communication, Inc., of the United Church of Christ, Media Access Project, the Benton Foundation, the Center for Media Education, and the Civil Rights Forum IS GRANTED. 7. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to Section 1.46 of
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Cable/Orders/1999/da993011.doc
  • Our rules provide that a response to a pole attachment complaint must be filed within thirty (30) days of the filing of the complaint. Under our rules, a response to the Complaint would be filed by December 30, 1999. Respondent requests that we extend the deadline for filing its Response in this proceeding to January 30, 2000, pursuant to Section 1.46 of the Commission's rules concerning extensions of time. Respondent asserts that good cause exists for granting the requested extension. Respondent asserts that it received the Complaint on December 2, 1999 via first-class mail and was not successful in obtaining outside counsel until December 14, 1999; the Complaint is voluminous requiring a significant amount of time to thoroughly address Complainant's factual
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Cable/Orders/2000/da000482.doc
  • not be routinely granted. BG&E has not provided us with any compelling reason that would warrant an extension of time. Section 1.1407(a) of our Rules provides for a response to a complaint and a reply by the complainant to the response, and further provides that "[e]xtensions of time to file are not contemplated unless justification is shown pursuant to Section 1.46 [and e]xcept as otherwise provided in Section 1.1403, no other filings, and no motions other than for extensions of time will be considered unless authorized by the Commission." We will rule on the jurisdictional issue in our normal course of consideration of the Complaint based on our three established pleadings, and when we have a full record on which to
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Cable/Orders/2000/da001083.doc
  • by Energy Northwest, Inc., ("Respondent"), to a complaint ("Complaint") filed by TCI Cablevision of Montana d/b/a AT&T Cable Services ("Complainant") on April 14, 2000 pursuant to 47 U.S.C. � 224. Under the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.1407 (a), a response is due by May 15, 2000. The Motion was filed as an emergency motion pursuant to 47 C.F.R. � 1.46 on May 12, 2000. The Respondent requests that the time for responding to the Complaint be extended to May 24, 2000. In support of its Motion, Respondent argues that its counsel discovered a conflict of interest requiring Respondent to obtain new counsel as of May 11, 2000. Respondent also argues that it may be a person who is cooperatively organized
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Cable/Orders/2000/da001847.doc
  • complete copy of the Response. The parties have negotiated an agreement that will result in Complainant receiving a complete copy of the Response. Complainant has provided us with a compelling reason that supports an extension of time. Therefore, we will extend the time for filing a reply until August 30, 2000. 3. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to Sections 0.321, 1.46 and 1.1407 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.321, 1.46 and 1.1407, that Complainant's Motion for Extension of Time IS GRANTED TO THE EXTENT INDICATED HEREIN. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Kathleen F. Costello, Acting Chief Financial Analysis and Compliance Division Cable Services Bureau 47 C.F.R. � 1.46(a). Federal Communications Commission DA 00-0000 Federal Communications Commission DA 00-1847 � � �@���
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Cable/Orders/2000/fcc00037.doc
  • Entitled to Commercial Leased Access to Cable Facilities under Section 612 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, Public Notice, DA 99-1104 (rel. June 8, 1999). Comments were due on July 13, 1999 and replies were originally due on July 28, 1999. IVI later filed for a "Motion for Extension of Time," which was subsequently granted, pursuant to Section 1.46 of the Commission's rules, requesting that the deadline for filing replies be extended until August 11, 1999. See In the Matter of: Internet Ventures, Inc. and Internet On-Ramp, Inc., Memorandum Opinion and Order, 14 FCC Rcd 11636 (1999). A list of commenters and reply commenters is set forth in Appendix A and includes the acronyms and abbreviations by which they
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1996/fcc96325.pdf
  • certification of service as required by � 1.1404(b) of this subpart. The named respondent may file an answer within 7 days of the date the Petition for Temporary Stay was filed. No further filings under this section will be considered unless requested or authorized by the Commission and no extensions of time will be granted unless justified pursuant to � 1.46. 7. Section 1.1404 is amended by revising paragraphs (b) and (c) and by adding new paragraph (k) to read as follows: � 1.1404 Complaint. * * * * * (b) The complaint shall be accompanied by a certification of service on the named respondent, and each of the Federal, State, and local governmental agencies that regulate any aspect of the
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1997/da971847.html http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1997/da971847.txt http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1997/da971847.wp
  • estimates of these figures.[4]^(2) In addition, the new universal service support mechanisms will be implemented starting January 1, 1998. In order to meet the tight implementation schedule, Worksheets must be filed in a timely manner. 3. It is THEREFORE ORDERED, pursuant to section 4(i) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. 154(i) and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.46(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 0.91, 0.291, and 1.46(a), that Metrocall's motion for an extension of time IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Kenneth P. Moran Chief, Accounting and Audits Division, Common Carrier Bureau _____________________ 1. See 47 C.F.R. 1.46(a). 2. Changes to the Board of Directors of the National Exchange Carrier Association, Inc. and Federal-State Joint Board on Universal
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1997/da972538.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1997/da972538.txt http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1997/da972538.wp
  • Notice, DA 97-2329 (rel. Nov. 5, 1997). 22 See, e.g., Comments by the Nebraska Public Service Commission; State of Alabama comments at 1-2; Comments of the Illinois Commerce Commission at 1-2; Comments of Ameritech at 2. 23 See, e.g., Comments of U S West, Inc., to Requests for Extension of Time; Comments of MCI Telecommunications Corporation. 24 47 C.F.R. � 1.46(a). 4 4. On November 5, 1997, the Commission requested comment on these extension requests.21 Commenters generally supported states' need for additional time to complete their cost studies.22 Some commenters argued, however, that extensions should not be granted beyond a date that would permit the Commission to implement support for non-rural carriers based on forward-looking economic costs on January 1, 1999.23
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1998/da980063.html http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1998/da980063.txt http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1998/da980063.wp
  • must be filed on or before February 6, 1998. All other requirements and procedures established in the Commission's January 5, 1998 Public Notice concerning the report to Congress remain in effect. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Lisa Gelb Chief, Universal Service Branch Accounting and Audits Division Common Carrier Bureau _____________________ 1. See Public Notice, DA 98-2 (January 5, 1998). 2. 47 C.F.R. 1.46(a). References 1. http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1998/da980063.txt 2. http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1998/da980063.wp 3. http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1998/da980063.html#N_1_ 4. http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1998/da980063.html#N_2_
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1998/da980719.pdf
  • of all facets of the issues presented by ISIS, thus further preventing the Commission from reaching an informed decision on the best available information."10 Finally, the Tennessee Department asserts that its Federal Communications Commission DA 98-719 11 Tennessee Motion at 3. 12 ENA Motion at 2. 13 ENA Motion at 2. 14 ENA Motion at 2. 15 47 C.F.R. � 1.46(a). 3 counsel was not served with the ISIS Objection and could not receive documentation until April 8, 1998, leaving only three business days for review by the April 13 response date.11 5. ENA agrees with the Tennessee Department in asserting that submitting responses to both the Commission and SLC at the same time "will promote the orderly conduct of the
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1998/da980788.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1998/da980788.wp
  • NARUC asserts that state commissions Federal Communications Commission DA 98-788 other variables that can be modified within the mechanism or its components. See Further Notice at paras. 17-18. 11 NARUC Request for Further Extension of Time at 4-5. 12 See, e.g., Arizona Comments in Support of NARUC's Extension Request at 2; Oregon Extension Request at 1. 13 47 C.F.R. � 1.46(a). 14 In the Universal Service Order, the Commission stated that it would implement the revised high cost support mechanisms for non-rural carriers on January 1, 1999. Universal Service Order, 12 FCC Rcd at 8889 para. 203. 3 require additional time because of further delays in receiving final versions of the models that are being considered in this proceeding and resulting
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1998/da982014.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1998/da982014.txt http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1998/da982014.wp
  • 20, 1998 through November 19, 1998 for preparation of Charts 4 and 5, rather than July 1998. RTC contends that this period is a representative billing period that will also allow RTC to respond to Federal Communications Commission DA 98-2014 9 North State Motion for Extension of Time and Modification of Data Response Requirement at 2. 10 47 C.F.R. � 1.46(a). 3 the data request in conjunction with performing its standard operational billing activities. RTC also contends that it is unable to sub-divide the business end-user category according to number of subscriber lines that were in use at the time of billing, as required by the data request. RTC requests that it be allowed to interpolate these figures, based on current
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1998/da982050.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1998/da982050.txt http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1998/da982050.wp
  • DA 98-2050 3 Sprint Motion for Extension of Time, filed Oct. 6, 1998. 4 North State Supplement to Motion for Extension of Time and Modification of Data Request Requirement, filed Oct. 6, 1998; see also North State Motion for Extension of Time and Modification of Data Response, filed Oct. 2, 1998. 5 Extension Order at 3-4. 6 47 C.F.R. � 1.46(a). 2 concerns about the accuracy of certain data items.3 Rather than submitting incomplete or inaccurate data, Sprint requests an extension of time to complete its response to October 20, 1998.3.North State Telephone Company (North State) has filed a supplement to its request for an extension of time to complete its response to the data request, which states that North State
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/da992448.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/da992448.txt
  • by communications services and equipment not covered by the rules and policies adopted in the Report and Order. The current comment and reply comment deadlines for the Further Notice of Inquiry (FNOI) are November 14, 1999, and December 14, 1999, respectively. 2. On October 22, 1999, the Voice on the Net Coalition (VON Coalition) filed a motion pursuant to section 1.46 of the Commission's rules, requesting an extension of 60 days for each deadline, or until January 13, 2000 and February 14, 2000, respectively. Von Coalition states that the requested extension will provide parties additional time in which to meet to more clearly frame the issues and establish the basis for a continuing dialogue between industry representatives and advocates for the
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/da992722.doc
  • of Roseville's request is warranted. We find merit in Roseville's request. The June CAM filing date will not affect other related reporting requirements, and thus causes no harm to the public interest. We, therefore, grant Roseville an extension of time until June 9, 2000 to file its initial CAM. 4. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to Sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.46 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, and 1.46, that Roseville's request for an extension of time until June 9, 2000, to file its initial cost allocation manual IS GRANTED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Kenneth P. Moran Chief, Accounting Safeguards Division 47 C.F.R. � 64.903(a). See 47 C.F.R. �1.46(a). Federal Communications Commission DA 99-2722 Federal Communications Commission DA 99-2722
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/da992723.doc
  • will provide Century with enough time to file an accurate CAM. The June CAM filing date will not affect other related reporting requirements, and thus causes no harm to the public interest. We, therefore, grant Century an extension of time until June 9, 2000 to file its initial CAM. 4. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to Sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.46 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, and 1.46, that Century's request for an extension of time until June 9, 2000, to file its initial cost allocation manual IS GRANTED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Kenneth P. Moran Chief, Accounting Safeguards Division 47 C.F.R. � 64.903(a). See 47 C.F.R. �1.46(a). Federal Communications Commission DA 99-2723 Federal Communications Commission DA 99-2723
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/da992806.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/da992806.txt
  • comment deadlines to the dates requested by USTA will not allow us sufficient time to fully review the comments and prescribe an X-factor prior to the expiration of the court's stay on April 1, 2000. Therefore, we conclude that modifying USTA's request for the extension, as specified below, is in the public interest. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to Section 1.46 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.46, that the request of USTA is GRANTED to the extent indicated. The comment deadline in the X-factor FNPRM is extended to January 7, 2000, and the reply comment deadline is extended to January 24, 2000. FEDERAL COMMUNICATION COMMISSION Jane E. Jackson Chief, Competitive Pricing Division Common Carrier Bureau Price Cap Performance Review
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da000010.doc
  • its incumbent local exchange carrier members to gather data necessary to compile a complete factual record on the potential impacts that could arise from allowing carriers to use combinations of unbundled network elements to provide exchange access service. On January 3, 1999, Sprint filed an opposition to USTA's request for an extension of time. 3. As set forth in Section 1.46(a) of the Commission's Rules, the Commission does not routinely grant requests for extension of time. The Commission acknowledged in the Fourth FNPRM that resolution of the exchange access issue could have a large financial impact on incumbent local exchange carriers, and we expect interested parties to provide detailed data and analysis on this impact. Accordingly, under these circumstances, we believe
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da000873.doc
  • for Extension of Time, filed April 10, 2000, by the Regulatory Commission of Alaska IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Michelle M. Carey Chief Policy and Program Planning Division Common Carrier Bureau Pleading Cycle Established on AT&T and Alascom petition for Structural and Other Regulatory Relief, CC Docket No. 00-46, DA 00-603 (Com. Car. Bur. Mar. 17, 2000), 47 C.F.R. � 1.46. We note that AT&T and Alascom state that that they ``would not object if the [Commission] withheld a decision in this proceeding until after September 1, 2000, in order to afford the [Alaska Commission] an opportunity to supplement the record'' through an ex parte filing. AT&T and Alascom Opposition at 3. Federal Communications Commission DA 00-873 Federal Communications Commission DA
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001249.doc
  • grant extensions of time, we are persuaded that the grant of Roseville's request is warranted. We find merit in Roseville's request. An extension of time will cause no harm to the public interest. We, therefore, grant Roseville an extension of time until October 10, 2000 to file its initial CAM. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to Sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.46 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. ��0.91, 0.291, and 1.46, that Roseville's request for an extension of time until October 10, 2000, to file its initial cost allocation manual IS GRANTED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Kenneth P. Moran Chief, Accounting Safeguards Division 47 C.F.R. �64.903(a). Among other reasons, Roseville requested the initial extension of time because it had entered a Y2K
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001851.doc
  • Commission of its intent to do so. On July 17, 2000, Western Wireless filed a letter with the Commission indicating its intent to supplement the record regarding its petition to seek ETC designation for the Crow Reservation under section 214(e)(6). On August 9, 2000, Western Wireless filed a letter with the Commission requesting an extension of time, pursuant to section 1.46 of the Commission's rules, until October 2, 2000, to supplement the record in this proceeding. Western Wireless contends this additional time is necessary because, in the time since Western Wireless filed its petition in this matter, the Crow tribe has changed administrations, and Western Wireless is in the process of working with the tribe's new leadership regarding the company's proposal
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2002/fcc02331.pdf
  • 1 B.2.1.3.1.1Loop + Port Combinations/<10 circuits/Dispatch/TN (days) 4.75 2.96 5.57 3.09 5.72 3.14 6.01 2.87 5.92 2.98 B.2.1.3.1.2Loop + Port Combinations/<10 circuits/Non-Dispatch/TN (days) 0.90 0.64 0.89 0.67 0.91 0.70 0.91 0.94 1.10 0.83 B.2.1.3.1.3Loop + Port Combinations/<10 circuits/Switch Based Orders/TN (days) 0.33 0.33 0.33 0.33 0.33 0.33 0.33 0.33 0.33 0.33 B.2.1.3.1.4Loop + Port Combinations/<10 circuits/Dispatch In/TN (days) 1.49 1.25 1.46 1.29 1.51 1.33 1.50 1.49 1.80 1.43 B.2.1.3.2.1Loop + Port Combinations/>=10 circuits/Dispatch/TN (days) 11.74 3.50 21.18 2.67 9.77 0.33 13.56 4.50 12.66 3.00 1,2,3,4,5 B.2.1.3.2.2Loop + Port Combinations/>=10 circuits/Non-Dispatch/TN (days) 4.49 3.00 6.44 6.08 7.01 4.00 7.18 1,4 B.2.1.3.2.4Loop + Port Combinations/>=10 circuits/Dispatch In/TN (days) 5.47 3.00 10.05 7.76 8.84 4.00 9.62 1,4 B.2.1.4.1.1Combo Other/<10 circuits/Dispatch/TN (days) 5.91 11.30 7.06
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/2000/da001220.doc
  • and reply comment dates to June 13 and June 20, 2000. This extension will provide interested parties with more than three weeks from the date of release of the Public Notice in which to prepare their supplemental filings, a period that we believe should be sufficient to prepare the requested information. For the foregoing reasons, pursuant to 47 C.F.R. � 1.46 of the Commission's rules, the Common Carrier Bureau hereby extends the comment and reply comment dates in this matter to June 13 and June 20, 2000, respectively. For further information, please contact William J. Scher or Dana Walton-Bradford, Accounting Policy Division, Common Carrier Bureau at (202) 418-7400, TTY (202) 418-0484. # $ % ' ( ) * ' ( )
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/2001/da011041.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/2001/da011041.txt
  • Eschelon Telecom, Inc., Intermedia Communications, Inc., KMC Telecom Inc., Local Telephone and Data Services, Network Telephone Corporation, Network Access Solutions, New Edge Network, Inc., NewSouth Communications, Inc., NuVox Inc., Pac-West Telecomm, Inc., RCN Telecom Services, Inc., US LEC Communications Inc., and WorldCom, Inc., CC Docket No. 96-98 (filed Apr. 19, 2001) (Joint Motion). Joint Motion at 2-3. 47 C.F.R. � 1.46(a). 47 C.F.R. � 1.1206. PUBLIC NOTICE Federal Communications Commission 445 12th St., S.W. Washington, D.C. 20554 News Media Information 202 / 418-0500 Fax-On-Demand 202 / 418-2830 TTY 202 / 418-2555 Internet: http://www.fcc.gov ftp.fcc.gov T U W (R) � � � S T � S T � �� ����PNG RR�~R�n� |�o� |�o� X*�N�*K � ~j0tm@"Iu�� �2~��y=��b��"���05 X� ?''z[�'';: ''@�/'", �Z!� g$!���H
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ldrpt103.pdf
  • 1.42 1990 0.20 0.27 1951 0.20 1.37 1991 0.20 0.26 1952 0.20 1.35 1992 0.19 0.24 $1.01 $0.15 1953 0.21 1.38 1993 0.19 0.24 1.02 0.15 1954 0.22 1.47 1994 0.18 0.21 0.93 0.14 1955 0.23 1.52 1995 0.17 0.20 0.91 0.12 1956 0.23 1.52 1996 0.16 0.18 0.76 0.12 1957 0.24 1.50 1997 0.15 0.16 0.69 0.11 1958 0.24 1.46 1998 0.14 0.16 0.58 0.11 1959 0.24 1.47 1999 0.14 0.15 0.54 0.11 1960 0.24 1.44 2000 0.12 0.12 0.52 0.09 1961 0.25 1.47 2001 0.10 0.10 0.35 0.08 1962 0.25 1.48 1963 0.25 1.44 1964 0.25 1.42 1965 0.24 1.35 1966 0.24 1.33 1967 0.24 1.29 1968 0.24 1.20 1969 0.24 1.16 Sources: Estimates for 1930 through 1981 are
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref02.pdf
  • 4.67 1985 1.98 1.80 1.70 2.59 2.33 2.00 3.00 2.82 2.20 3.48 3.29 3.34 3.66 3.48 3.45 3.85 3.72 3.63 3.97 3.84 3.70 4.07 3.96 3.80 4.43 4.28 4.10 1986 1.75 1.67 1.61 2.26 2.12 2.11 2.57 2.47 2.46 2.95 2.85 2.84 3.14 3.04 3.03 3.33 3.25 3.24 3.44 3.35 3.34 3.54 3.46 3.45 3.79 3.68 3.67 1987 1.48 1.45 1.46 1.89 1.85 1.86 2.09 2.04 2.06 2.38 2.32 2.34 2.56 2.51 2.52 2.75 2.70 2.70 2.95 2.90 2.92 2.96 2.91 2.93 3.08 3.04 3.04 1988 1.47 1.44 1.44 1.78 1.75 1.76 1.98 1.94 1.94 2.16 2.12 2.13 2.34 2.40 2.40 2.43 2.50 2.50 2.64 2.69 2.71 2.64 2.71 2.73 2.75 2.84 2.84 1989 1.71 1.70 1.70 2.01 2.00 2.00 2.21
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref03.pdf
  • 4.06 4.83 4.47 4.67 19851.98 1.80 1.70 2.59 2.33 2.00 3.00 2.82 2.20 3.48 3.29 3.34 3.66 3.48 3.45 3.85 3.72 3.63 3.97 3.84 3.70 4.07 3.96 3.80 4.43 4.28 4.10 19861.75 1.67 1.61 2.26 2.12 2.11 2.57 2.47 2.46 2.95 2.85 2.84 3.14 3.04 3.03 3.33 3.25 3.24 3.44 3.35 3.34 3.54 3.46 3.45 3.79 3.68 3.67 19871.48 1.45 1.46 1.89 1.85 1.86 2.09 2.04 2.06 2.38 2.32 2.34 2.56 2.51 2.52 2.75 2.70 2.70 2.95 2.90 2.92 2.96 2.91 2.93 3.08 3.04 3.04 19881.47 1.44 1.44 1.78 1.75 1.76 1.98 1.94 1.94 2.16 2.12 2.13 2.34 2.40 2.40 2.43 2.50 2.50 2.64 2.69 2.71 2.64 2.71 2.73 2.75 2.84 2.84 19891.71 1.70 1.70 2.01 2.00 2.00 2.21 2.15 2.20
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref04.pdf
  • 1.52 1983 3.13 2.82 2.24 2.02 1.55 1984 2.71 2.44 2.21 1.82 1.51 1985 2.72 2.41 2.20 1.81 1.39 1986 2.94 2.62 2.15 1.83 1.43 1987 3.24 2.57 2.31 1.85 1.44 1988 3.23 2.61 2.31 1.82 1.49 1989 3.05 2.61 2.30 1.88 1.43 1990 3.11 2.77 2.37 1.89 1.48 1991 3.08 2.80 2.28 1.84 1.45 1992 3.35 2.77 2.34 1.88 1.46 1993 3.27 2.70 2.45 1.96 1.53 1994 3.17 2.83 2.36 1.95 1.58 1995 3.38 2.71 2.41 1.99 1.55 1996 3.20 2.94 2.46 2.05 1.57 1997 3.24 3.02 2.53 2.09 1.63 1998 3.17 2.79 2.55 2.16 1.69 1999 3.33 2.70 2.49 2.12 1.63 2000 3.33 2.70 2.49 2.12 1.63 2001 3.21 2.66 2.48 2.15 1.74 2002 2.96 2.74 2.54 2.16 1.74
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref05.pdf
  • 1.52 1983 3.13 2.82 2.24 2.02 1.55 1984 2.71 2.44 2.21 1.82 1.51 1985 2.72 2.41 2.20 1.81 1.39 1986 2.94 2.62 2.15 1.83 1.43 1987 3.24 2.57 2.31 1.85 1.44 1988 3.23 2.61 2.31 1.82 1.49 1989 3.05 2.61 2.30 1.88 1.43 1990 3.11 2.77 2.37 1.89 1.48 1991 3.08 2.80 2.28 1.84 1.45 1992 3.35 2.77 2.34 1.88 1.46 1993 3.27 2.70 2.45 1.96 1.53 1994 3.17 2.83 2.36 1.95 1.58 1995 3.38 2.71 2.41 1.99 1.55 1996 3.20 2.94 2.46 2.05 1.57 1997 3.24 3.02 2.53 2.09 1.63 1998 3.17 2.79 2.55 2.16 1.69 1999 3.33 2.70 2.49 2.12 1.63 2000 3.21 2.66 2.48 2.15 1.74 2001 2.96 2.74 2.54 2.16 1.74 2002 3.06 2.73 2.52 2.28 1.81
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref98.pdf
  • 1968 0.500.500.50 0.550.550.55 1.051.051.05 1.601.101.10 2.201.65 1.65 3.152.20 1.65 3.752.652.10 4.35 3.20 2.60 4.85 3.70 2.75 January 1, 1970 0.500.500.45 0.550.550.45 1.051.051.05 1.601.101.05 2.151.60 1.55 2.601.60 1.55 3.552.051.55 4.10 2.55 2.05 4.55 2.65 2.15 February 1, 1970 0.500.500.45 0.550.550.45 1.051.051.05 1.601.101.05 2.101.60 1.55 2.551.60 1.55 3.152.051.55 4.05 2.50 2.05 4.50 2.60 2.15 January 26, 1971 0.520.410.31 0.720.520.38 1.240.950.75 1.791.101.05 2.341.60 1.46 2.651.60 1.55 3.502.051.55 3.70 2.50 2.05 4.50 2.60 2.15 January 22, 1973 0.520.410.31 0.720.520.38 1.240.950.75 1.981.101.05 2.481.60 1.46 2.791.60 1.55 3.602.051.55 4.29 2.50 2.05 4.67 2.60 2.15 March 9, 1975 0.700.450.27 1.020.660.40 1.951.260.78 2.751.781.10 3.152.04 1.26 3.352.17 1.34 3.652.371.45 3.96 2.57 1.58 4.16 2.70 1.66 February 29, 1976 0.910.590.36 1.400.910.56 2.151.390.86 2.951.911.18 3.252.11 1.30 3.452.24 1.38 3.562.311.42 3.76 2.44 1.50
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref99.pdf
  • 1968 0.500.500.50 0.550.550.55 1.051.051.05 1.601.101.10 2.201.65 1.65 3.152.20 1.65 3.752.652.10 4.35 3.20 2.60 4.85 3.70 2.75 January 1, 1970 0.500.500.45 0.550.550.45 1.051.051.05 1.601.101.05 2.151.60 1.55 2.601.60 1.55 3.552.051.55 4.10 2.55 2.05 4.55 2.65 2.15 February 1, 1970 0.500.500.45 0.550.550.45 1.051.051.05 1.601.101.05 2.101.60 1.55 2.551.60 1.55 3.152.051.55 4.05 2.50 2.05 4.50 2.60 2.15 January 26, 1971 0.520.410.31 0.720.520.38 1.240.950.75 1.791.101.05 2.341.60 1.46 2.651.60 1.55 3.502.051.55 3.70 2.50 2.05 4.50 2.60 2.15 January 22, 1973 0.520.410.31 0.720.520.38 1.240.950.75 1.981.101.05 2.481.60 1.46 2.791.60 1.55 3.602.051.55 4.29 2.50 2.05 4.67 2.60 2.15 March 9, 1975 0.700.450.27 1.020.660.40 1.951.260.78 2.751.781.10 3.152.04 1.26 3.352.17 1.34 3.652.371.45 3.96 2.57 1.58 4.16 2.70 1.66 February 29, 1976 0.910.590.36 1.400.910.56 2.151.390.86 2.951.911.18 3.252.11 1.30 3.452.24 1.38 3.562.311.42 3.76 2.44 1.50
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ror96.pdf
  • 14.40 132UNITED TELEPHONE CO. OF FLORIDA 12.58 12.44 12.84 11.66 205.28 15.71 12.92 133UNITED TELEPHONE CO. OF INDIANA, INC. 12.06 12.44 7.35 12.18 560.18 12.36 12.83 134UNITED TELEPHONE CO. OF IOWA 12.85 12.45 6.81 9.87 118.15 22.89 14.93 135UNITED TELEPHONE CO. OF KANSAS 12.79 12.44 11.70 8.41 16.52 23.92 13.59 136UNITED TELEPHONE CO. OF MINNESOTA 12.32 12.45 14.20 14.00 6,429.48 (1.46) 11.44 137UNITED TELEPHONE CO. OF MISSOURI 12.53 12.44 15.57 8.87 13.20 19.04 12.18 138UNITED TELEPHONE CO. OF NEW JERSEY 12.83 12.44 13.60 2.45 7,990.64 36.50 13.60 139UNITED TELEPHONE CO. OF OHIO 12.64 12.45 11.98 10.90 414.09 15.06 13.04 140UNITED TELEPHONE CO. OF PENNSYLVANIA 12.57 12.44 8.89 6.80 2,031.85 22.99 13.92 141UNITED TELEPHONE CO. OF TEXAS, INC. 11.70 12.44 4.39 14.38
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/strev-95.pdf
  • 88,680 100% 95% 95% Total 112,831 86,176199,005111,709 85,319197,028 1995 TRS revenue adjusted is 1995 TRS revenue reduced by 0.99%. This is to take into account that revenue is not allocated to Alaska, Micronesia, and Puerto Rico -7 Table 1 Total Billed Revenue Interstate Instrastate Intrastate+Interstate Percent of Total (millions) (millions) (millions) ALABAMA $1,161 $1,606 $2,767 1.39 ARIZONA 1,566 1,343 2,909 1.46 ARKANSAS 694 854 1,548 0.78 CALIFORNIA 8,040 14,810 22,850 11.48 COLORADO 1,621 1,594 3,214 1.62 CONNECTICUT 1,414 1,429 2,843 1.43 DELAWARE 301 200 501 0.25 DC 513 409 922 0.46 FLORIDA 5,214 6,635 11,849 5.95 GEORGIA 2,709 3,087 5,796 2.91 HAWAII 373 432 805 0.40 IDAHO 437 363 800 0.40 ILLINOIS 3,507 4,668 8,175 4.11 INDIANA 1,550 2,353 3,903 1.96
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/strev-96.pdf
  • (Millions) ALABAMA $822 $54 $876 $958 1.69 $1,002 $24 $1,026 ALASKA N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A ARIZONA 779 (7) 773 824 1.45 862 20 883 ARKANSAS 323 5 327 428 0.76 448 11 459 CALIFORNIA 5,362 253 5,615 5,703 10.06 5,965 141 6,107 COLORADO 841 134 975 1,019 1.80 1,066 25 1,091 CONNECTICUT 642 179 821 829 1.46 867 21 888 DELAWARE 133 2 135 135 0.24 141 3 145 DIST. OF COLUMBIA 301 57 358 358 0.63 374 9 383 FLORIDA 2,994 376 3,370 3,423 6.04 3,581 85 3,666 GEORGIA 1,670 91 1,761 2,076 3.66 2,172 52 2,224 HAWAII 240 46 287 287 0.51 300 7 307 IDAHO 167 (5) 162 178 0.31 186 4 190 ILLINOIS
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/strev-97.pdf
  • 6.00 54 0.66 54 VIRGIN ISLANDS N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A GRAND TOTAL 5.68 $8,173 100.00 $8,205 FIGURES MAY NOT ADD UP DUE TO ROUNDING. 31 Table 16 Interstate Access Revenue: 1997* Interstate Interstate SLC Net AllocationInterstate Interstate Access Access, SOCC(Millions) Access Percentage Access Access SOCC, 2.13 Adjusted (Millions) End UserIndustry (Millions) (Millions) (Millions) ALABAMA $339 $371 $117 $254 1.46 $20 $265 ALASKA N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A ARIZONA 410 436 144 292 1.69 23 305 ARKANSAS 167 223 65 158 0.91 12 165 CALIFORNIA 2,381 2,417 858 1,559 8.99 122 1,625 COLORADO 480 501 146 356 2.05 28 371 CONNECTICUT 371 375 103 272 1.57 21 284 DELAWARE 70 70 26 45 0.26 3 47 DIST. OF
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/strev-99.pdf
  • 872 2,105 4,804 7,179 11,983 4.46 Indiana 1,481 2,556 4,037 568 494 1,061 2,049 3,050 5,099 1.90 Iowa 786 1,135 1,921 295 225 520 1,081 1,360 2,441 0.91 Kansas 813 1,274 2,086 298 203 501 1,111 1,477 2,588 0.96 Kentucky 1,011 1,704 2,715 406 305 711 1,416 2,010 3,426 1.28 Louisiana 1,115 2,100 3,215 405 293 698 1,519 2,393 3,913 1.46 Maine 362 590 951 157 86 243 519 675 1,195 0.44 Maryland 1,762 2,498 4,259 577 340 917 2,339 2,837 5,176 1.93 Massachusetts 2,169 3,186 5,355 834 372 1,206 3,003 3,558 6,561 2.44 Michigan 2,295 5,514 7,809 847 874 1,721 3,142 6,388 9,530 3.55 Minnesota 1,450 2,217 3,667 552 397 950 2,002 2,615 4,617 1.72 Mississippi 682 1,206 1,888 254
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend100.pdf
  • 10,232 1,539 4,014 888 RBOCs 3.50 5.78 6.79 1.01 1.61 2.36 0.30 78,393 14,205 30,257 11,952 Aliant (AllTel) 3.50 6.07 6.75 0.92 0.16 0.16 0.05 182 16 47 30 Cincinnati Bell 3.50 6.07 6.26 1.04 1.12 1.12 0.13 645 79 213 72 Citizens 3.50 5.98 9.09 1.04 2.37 4.21 1.02 727 42 123 56 Frontier 3.50 5.56 5.87 1.04 1.08 1.46 0.25 648 70 171 81 GTE 3.50 6.07 8.59 1.04 2.53 4.31 0.81 12,645 1,457 3,293 1,237 Sprint Local 3.50 5.82 7.37 0.99 2.03 3.72 0.52 5,018 618 1,238 451 Independent Price Caps 3.50 5.99 8.10 1.03 2.28 3.90 0.69 19,865 2,282 5,086 1,927 All Price Caps 3.50 5.81 6.98 1.01 1.70 2.58 0.35 98,258 16,487 35,342 13,879 NECA***** 3.50
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend200.pdf
  • 0.00 0.38 0.26 1.33 28,738 52,997 81,100 Cincinnati Bell 0.00 0.00 0.52 0.19 1.47 1,059 2,191 3,251 Citizens 1.28 0.00 0.92 1.14 5.56 1,550 1,486 3,015 Global Crossing 0.64 0.00 0.72 0.42 3.02 774 1,826 2,604 Iowa Telecom 1.66 0.00 0.84 0.22 3.96 252 516 770 Qwest 0.00 0.00 0.49 0.19 1.41 21,588 40,107 62,239 SBC 0.00 0.00 0.50 0.21 1.46 63,313 86,767 152,856 Sprint 0.30 0.00 0.70 0.18 2.12 9,467 14,759 24,349 Verizon 0.35 0.00 0.48 0.21 1.79 61,426 127,515 190,453 All Price Caps 0.16 0.00 0.49 0.22 1.63 188,412 328,724 521,451 NECA 1.00 1.39 1.59 1.43 8.62 14,074 16,181 15,903 All Price Caps and NECA 0.23� 0.07� 0.52� 0.26� 1.91� 202,487 344,905 537,355 Source: Access tariff filings. Switched Traffic
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend502.pdf
  • 2.99 1942 0.22 0.26 16.3 2.28 2.69 1943 0.21 0.22 17.3 2.10 2.19 1944 0.22 0.22 17.6 2.11 2.15 1945 0.21 0.22 18.0 2.03 2.10 1946 0.20 0.22 19.5 1.74 1.94 1947 0.19 0.22 22.3 1.48 1.70 1948 0.19 0.22 24.1 1.33 1.57 1949 0.19 0.22 23.8 1.36 1.59 1950 0.19 0.22 24.1 1.38 1.57 1951 0.20 0.22 26.0 1.33 1.46 1952 0.20 0.22 26.5 1.32 1.43 1953 0.21 0.22 26.7 1.34 1.42 1954 0.22 0.22 26.9 1.43 1.41 1955 0.23 0.22 26.8 1.48 1.41 1956 0.23 0.22 27.2 1.48 1.39 1957 0.24 0.22 28.1 1.46 1.35 1958 0.24 0.22 28.9 1.42 1.31 1959 0.24 0.22 29.1 1.43 1.30 1960 0.24 0.22 29.6 1.40 1.28 1961 0.25 0.22 29.9 1.43 1.27
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend504.pdf
  • 0.68 0.23 1.29 0.21 4.04 07/01/98 12/31/98 0.91 0.20 0.99 0.30 3.82 01/01/99 06/30/99 0.82 0.16 0.98 0.32 3.71 07/01/99 12/31/99 0.37 0.10 0.86 0.28 2.82 01/01/00 06/30/00 0.32 0.10 0.86 0.31 2.85 08/11/00 06/31/004 0.23 0.07 0.52 0.26 1.91 07/01/01 12/31/01 0.15 0.07 0.48 0.24 1.71 01/01/02 06/30/02 0.15 0.07 0.47 0.24 1.69 07/01/02 06/30/03 0.02 0.01 0.48 0.22 1.46 07/01/03 06/30/04 0.00 0.00 0.48 0.22 1.44 Source: Access tariff filings. 4 Although the charges took effect on July 1, 2000, some companies made adjustments to the tariffs which did not take effect until August 11, 2000. 1 This table shows average rates (weighted by minutes of use) for all local exchange carriers (LECs) that file access tariffs subject to
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend605.pdf
  • 0.68 0.23 1.29 0.21 4.04 07/01/98 12/31/98 0.91 0.20 0.99 0.30 3.82 01/01/99 06/30/99 0.82 0.16 0.98 0.32 3.71 07/01/99 12/31/99 0.37 0.10 0.86 0.28 2.82 01/01/00 06/30/00 0.32 0.10 0.86 0.31 2.85 08/11/00 06/31/004 0.23 0.07 0.52 0.26 1.91 07/01/01 12/31/01 0.15 0.07 0.48 0.24 1.71 01/01/02 06/30/02 0.15 0.07 0.47 0.24 1.69 07/01/02 06/30/03 0.02 0.01 0.48 0.22 1.46 07/01/03 06/30/04 0.00 0.00 0.48 0.22 1.44 07/01/04 06/30/05 0.00 0.00 0.50 0.25 1.53 Source: Access tariff filings. Rates in Effect From To Sensitive per Switched Interstate Charges for Switched Access Service Minute 2 Traffic Sensitive per Switched Minute Non-Traffic Minute 1 Carrier Common Line per Terminating Access Minute 1 Carrier Common Line per Originating Access 4 Although the charges
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend801.pdf
  • 0.41 38.0 Illinois 7,916 8,920 10,069 10,948 2,105 9,878 11,983 4.46 51.4 Indiana 3,804 4,192 4,536 4,810 1,061 4,037 5,099 1.90 34.0 Iowa 1,888 2,039 2,163 2,268 520 1,921 2,441 0.91 29.3 Kansas 1,829 2,017 2,165 2,304 501 2,086 2,588 0.96 41.5 Kentucky 2,353 2,629 2,861 3,060 711 2,715 3,426 1.28 45.6 Louisiana 2,703 2,946 3,192 3,432 698 3,215 3,913 1.46 44.7 Maine 869 976 996 1,105 243 951 1,195 0.44 37.5 Maryland 3,767 4,234 4,625 4,911 917 4,259 5,176 1.93 37.4 Massachusetts 4,988 5,455 6,010 6,338 1,206 5,355 6,561 2.44 31.5 Michigan 6,444 7,246 7,983 8,523 1,721 7,809 9,530 3.55 47.9 Minnesota 3,064 3,461 3,864 4,115 950 3,667 4,617 1.72 50.7 Mississippi 1,584 1,734 1,877 2,017 395 1,888 2,283 0.85
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend803.pdf
  • 0.68 0.23 1.29 0.21 4.04 07/01/98 12/31/98 0.91 0.20 0.99 0.30 3.82 01/01/99 06/30/99 0.82 0.16 0.98 0.32 3.71 07/01/99 12/31/99 0.37 0.10 0.86 0.28 2.82 01/01/00 06/30/00 0.32 0.10 0.86 0.31 2.85 08/11/00 06/31/004 0.23 0.07 0.52 0.26 1.91 07/01/01 12/31/01 0.15 0.07 0.48 0.24 1.71 01/01/02 06/30/02 0.15 0.07 0.47 0.24 1.69 07/01/02 06/30/03 0.02 0.01 0.48 0.22 1.46 Source: Access tariff filings. Rates in Effect From To Sensitive per Switched Interstate Charges for Switched Access Service Minute 2 Traffic Sensitive per Switched Minute Non-Traffic Minute 1 Carrier Common Line per Terminating Access Minute 1 Carrier Common Line per Originating Access 4 Although the charges took effect on July 1, 2000, some companies made adjustments to the tariffs which
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Intl/itltrd98.pdf
  • Billed Foreign Billed Per Minute Number Payout Number Receipts Payout Receipts Weighted average of Billed To Retained of from Billed To Retained from U.S. retained & Minutes Revenue PTT Revenue Minutes PTT Revenue PTT Revenue PTT foreign receipts 1964 2/ 20 $63 $30 $33 12 $20 $3.11 $1.50 $1.62 $1.63 $1.62 1965 2/ 26 78 37 41 15 25 3.07 1.46 1.61 1.60 1.61 1966 2/ 32 100 48 53 19 30 3.10 1.47 1.63 1.59 1.61 1967 2/ 40 114 55 60 23 32 2.88 1.38 1.50 1.36 1.45 1968 46 127 62 65 28 40 2.73 1.33 1.41 1.42 1.41 1969 65 172 83 89 38 52 2.66 1.28 1.38 1.35 1.37 1970 81 197 99 98 51 60
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Intl/itltrd99.pdf
  • Billed Foreign Billed Per Minute Number Payout Number Receipts Payout Receipts Weighted average of Billed To Retained of from Billed To Retained from U.S. retained & Minutes Revenue PTT Revenue Minutes PTT Revenue PTT Revenue PTT foreign receipts 1964 2/ 20 $63 $30 $33 12 $20 $3.11 $1.50 $1.62 $1.63 $1.62 1965 2/ 26 78 37 41 15 25 3.07 1.46 1.61 1.60 1.61 1966 2/ 32 100 48 53 19 30 3.10 1.47 1.63 1.59 1.61 1967 2/ 40 114 55 60 23 32 2.88 1.38 1.50 1.36 1.45 1968 46 127 62 65 28 40 2.73 1.33 1.41 1.42 1.41 1969 65 172 83 89 38 52 2.66 1.28 1.38 1.35 1.37 1970 81 197 99 98 51 60
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Intl/itrnd00.pdf
  • Number End-User Payouts Number Receipts End-User Payout Receipts Net Retained of Billed to Retained of from Billed to Retained from Revenues for Minutes Revenues PTT Revenues Minutes PTT Revenues PTT Revenues PTT all U.S. and 4/ 5/ 4/ Foreign Minutes 1964 20.2 $62.9 $30.3 $32.6 12.0 $19.6 $3.11 $1.50 $1.62 $1.63 $1.62 1965 25.5 78.2 37.2 41.1 15.4 24.7 3.07 1.46 1.61 1.60 1.61 1966 32.3 100.1 47.6 52.5 18.9 30.1 3.10 1.47 1.63 1.59 1.61 1967 39.7 114.2 54.6 59.6 23.4 31.8 2.88 1.38 1.50 1.36 1.45 1968 46.4 126.9 61.5 65.4 28.2 40.0 2.73 1.33 1.41 1.42 1.41 1969 64.6 172.0 82.7 89.4 38.3 51.6 2.66 1.28 1.38 1.35 1.37 1970 81.1 196.6 98.9 97.7 51.0 59.8 2.43 1.22
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Intl/itrnd01.pdf
  • Number End-User Payouts Retained Number Receipts End-UserPayoutRetained Receipts Net Retained of Billed to Revenues of from Billed to Revenues from Revenues Minutes Revenues Foreign Minutes Foreign RevenuesForeign Foreign for all U.S. 4/ Carriers Carriers 6/ Carriers Carriers and Foreign Minutes 1964 20.2 $62.9 $30.3 $32.6 12.0 $19.6 $3.11 $1.50 $1.62 $1.63 $1.62 1965 25.5 78.2 37.2 41.1 15.4 24.7 3.07 1.46 1.61 1.60 1.61 1966 32.3 100.1 47.6 52.5 18.9 30.1 3.10 1.47 1.63 1.59 1.61 1967 39.7 114.2 54.6 59.6 23.4 31.8 2.88 1.38 1.50 1.36 1.45 1968 46.4 126.9 61.5 65.4 28.2 40.0 2.73 1.33 1.41 1.42 1.41 1969 64.6 172.0 82.7 89.4 38.3 51.6 2.66 1.28 1.38 1.35 1.37 1970 81.1 196.6 98.9 97.7 51.0 59.8 2.43 1.22
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr03-3.pdf
  • Loops per Loop Later Year* Alabama 6.87 -1.45 8.45 15.40 Alaska 3.24 1.14 2.07 2.32 American Samoa 27.70 3.48 23.40 INFINITE Arizona 3.24 -1.39 4.70 11.88 Arkansas 5.08 -2.49 7.76 18.30 California 7.83 -1.65 9.64 2.63 Colorado 1.06 -1.88 2.99 7.93 Connecticut 0.83 -5.72 6.94 0.00 Delaware 2.68 -1.49 4.23 0.00 District Of Columbia -0.22 -0.54 0.32 0.00 Florida 4.59 -1.46 6.14 10.47 Georgia 6.39 -2.60 9.23 -2.49 Guam -9.34 0.00 -9.34 0.00 Hawaii 10.84 -0.31 11.19 217.38 Idaho 2.95 -0.88 3.87 3.72 Illinois -1.64 -2.42 0.80 24.24 Indiana 0.20 2.54 -2.28 8.39 Iowa 1.25 -1.41 2.70 33.47 Kansas 0.95 -3.83 4.96 14.79 Kentucky 2.14 -0.84 3.00 -2.35 Louisiana 4.89 -1.44 6.42 0.06 Maine 8.09 1.12 6.89 -5.41 Maryland 2.28 0.21
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr03-7.pdf
  • 0.68 0.23 1.29 0.21 4.04 07/01/98 12/31/98 0.91 0.20 0.99 0.30 3.82 01/01/99 06/30/99 0.82 0.16 0.98 0.32 3.71 07/01/99 12/31/99 0.37 0.10 0.86 0.28 2.82 01/01/00 06/30/00 0.32 0.10 0.86 0.31 2.85 08/11/00 #06/30/01 0.23 0.07 0.52 0.26 1.91 07/01/01 12/31/01 0.15 0.07 0.48 0.24 1.71 01/01/02 06/30/02 0.15 0.07 0.47 0.24 1.69 07/01/02 06/30/03 0.02 0.01 0.48 0.22 1.46 * # Source: Access tariff filings. Minute* Access Traffic Sensitive per Switched Carrier Common Line per Terminating per Originating Minute* Common Line Rates in Effect Interstate Charges for Switched Access Service Non-Traffic Sensitive Total Charge per Carrier Access Although the charges took effect on July 1, 2000, some companies made adjustments to the tariffs which did not take effect until
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr04-1.pdf
  • subscriber line charges. 2/ Totals in the first six columns include revenues for locations not estimated. (Dollars in Millions) 1 - 46 Table 1.17 Adjustment Formula: 2002 1 2 3 Average PercentAdjustment Formula Reporting 2/ 100/Average Percent 2002 2002 Reporting Alabama 2,417,624 84.4% 1.18 Alaska 451,038 0.0 NA American Samoa 10,325 0.0 NA Arizona 2,929,763 93.0 1.08 Arkansas 1,453,606 68.3 1.46 California 22,684,649 98.4 1.02 Colorado 2,808,697 95.3 1.05 Connecticut 2,322,733 98.9 1.01 Delaware 580,535 100.0 1.00 District of Columbia 897,193 100.0 1.00 Florida 11,051,084 98.2 1.02 Georgia 4,952,969 88.5 1.13 Guam 70,975 0.0 NA Hawaii 706,080 99.9 1.00 Idaho 742,213 90.8 1.10 Illinois 7,988,559 95.0 1.05 Indiana 3,723,570 95.4 1.05 Iowa 1,659,718 64.7 1.55 Kansas 1,572,621 83.6 1.20 Kentucky 2,162,127
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr04-3.pdf
  • 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.04 0.01 0.07 Massachusetts 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.02 0.03 Michigan 0.31 0.00 0.00 0.14 0.05 0.00 0.11 0.62 Minnesota 0.77 0.02 0.00 0.36 0.50 0.14 0.48 2.27 Mississippi 1.13 0.00 7.17 0.31 0.25 1.04 0.19 10.10 Missouri 0.97 0.00 0.00 0.25 0.39 0.35 0.21 2.16 Montana 4.37 0.00 1.65 1.63 1.28 0.15 1.46 10.54 Nebraska 1.29 0.01 0.00 0.37 0.79 0.41 0.99 3.86 Nevada 0.54 0.01 0.00 0.07 0.16 0.58 0.50 1.85 New Hampshire 0.10 0.00 0.00 0.16 0.14 0.37 0.52 1.29 New Jersey 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.02 New Mexico 1.64 0.01 0.00 0.57 0.41 0.74 0.81 4.17 New York 0.07 0.00 0.00 0.04 0.02 0.11 0.12 0.37 North
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr04-7.pdf
  • 0.68 0.23 1.29 0.21 4.04 07/01/98 12/31/98 0.91 0.20 0.99 0.30 3.82 01/01/99 06/30/99 0.82 0.16 0.98 0.32 3.71 07/01/99 12/31/99 0.37 0.10 0.86 0.28 2.82 01/01/00 06/30/00 0.32 0.10 0.86 0.31 2.85 08/11/00 #06/30/01 0.23 0.07 0.52 0.26 1.91 07/01/01 12/31/01 0.15 0.07 0.48 0.24 1.71 01/01/02 06/30/02 0.15 0.07 0.47 0.24 1.69 07/01/02 06/30/03 0.02 0.01 0.48 0.22 1.46 07/01/03 06/30/04 0.00 0.00 0.48 0.22 1.44 * # Source: Access tariff filings. Although the charges took effect on July 1, 2000, some companies made adjustments to the tariffs which did not take effect until August 11, 2000. From This table shows average rates (weighted by minutes of use) for all local exchange carriers (LECs) that file access tariffs subject
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrs00-0.pdf
  • 0.00 0.38 0.26 1.33 28,738 52,997 81,100 Cincinnati Bell 0.00 0.00 0.52 0.19 1.47 1,059 2,191 3,251 Citizens 1.28 0.00 0.92 1.14 5.56 1,550 1,486 3,015 Global Crossing 0.64 0.00 0.72 0.42 3.02 774 1,826 2,604 Iowa Telecom 1.66 0.00 0.84 0.22 3.96 252 516 770 Qwest 0.00 0.00 0.49 0.19 1.41 21,588 40,107 62,239 SBC 0.00 0.00 0.50 0.21 1.46 63,313 86,767 152,856 Sprint 0.30 0.00 0.70 0.18 2.12 9,467 14,759 24,349 Verizon 0.35 0.00 0.48 0.21 1.79 61,426 127,515 190,453 All Price Caps 0.16 0.00 0.49 0.22 1.63 188,412 328,724 521,451 NECA 1.00 1.39 1.59 1.43 8.62 14,074 16,181 15,903 All Price Caps And NECA 0.23� 0.07� 0.52� 0.26� 1.91� 202,487 344,905 537,355 Source: Access tariff filings. Switched Traffic
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrs01-0.pdf
  • 0.86 139,931 0.89 -3,485 -0.02 Utah 12,347 0.87 17,143 1.21 -4,795 -0.34 Vermont 25,913 5.19 6,274 1.26 19,638 3.93 Virgin Islands 24,153 29.94 1,295 1.60 22,858 28.33 Virginia 37,126 0.65 66,631 1.17 -29,505 -0.52 Washington 51,259 1.14 49,844 1.11 1,414 0.03 West Virginia 63,061 5.18 12,561 1.03 50,500 4.15 Wisconsin 53,860 1.29 36,359 0.87 17,501 0.42 Wyoming 30,386 8.52 5,208 1.46 25,178 7.06 Industry Total $2,236,901 $1.01 $2,236,901 $1.01 $0 $0.00 * Net revenues are positive when payments from USF to carriers exceed contributions to USF. Notes: Figures may not add due to rounding. Support payments do not include quarterly true-ups. USF is an abbreviation for the Universal Service Fund. per Loop per Loop Total Monthly Total Monthly Table 3.14 Net
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrs02-0.pdf
  • Contributions to USF1 Carriers Total Total Non-Rural Rural 3 - 27 (Annual Payments and Contributions in Thousands) Total Monthly per Loop Alabama $94,412 $3.10 $34,962 $1.15 $59,450 $1.95 Alaska 77,780 14.21 6,565 1.20 71,215 13.01 Arizona 51,570 1.37 53,745 1.43 -2,175 -0.06 Arkansas 77,859 4.19 20,898 1.13 56,961 3.07 California 82,737 0.29 255,997 0.90 -173,260 -0.61 Colorado 62,194 1.72 52,728 1.46 9,465 0.26 Connecticut 1,104 0.04 41,315 1.35 -40,211 -1.31 Delaware 380 0.05 10,277 1.43 -9,897 -1.38 District of Columbia 0 0.00 14,859 1.34 -14,859 -1.34 Florida 84,390 0.61 175,902 1.28 -91,513 -0.66 Georgia 91,083 1.44 85,534 1.35 5,550 0.09 Guam 2,359 2.64 870 0.98 1,489 1.67 Hawaii 5,539 0.64 10,554 1.22 -5,015 -0.58 Idaho 43,568 4.72 13,605 1.47 29,963 3.24
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/SOCC/00socc.pdf
  • Operating Data Customer Lines (thousands) 4/ 1,097 1,100 4/ 17,600 4/ 61,250 8,300 Number of Employees 13,000 10,700 67,000 220,090 84,100 Selected Verizon Financial Communications WorldCom Data Inc. Inc. Revenues $64,707 $39,090 Costs & Expenses 47,949 30,937 Interest Expense 3,490 970 Other Income and Adjustments 2/ 5,538 (5) Income Taxes 7,009 3,025 Net Income 11,797 4,153 Earnings per Share 4.34 1.46 Dividends per Share 1.54 0 Average Shares Outstanding (millions) 2,713 2,868 Total Assets 164,735 98,903 Property, Plant and Equipment - Net 69,504 37,423 Long-Term Debt 42,491 17,696 Shareholders' Equity 34,578 55,409 Operating Data Customer Lines (thousands) 4/ 63,000 - Number of Employees 260,000 86,100 Source: Company annual reports to shareholders and annual reports Form 10-K. 1/ Operating revenues and costs
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/SOCC/95socc.pdf
  • DIAL $2.22 $1.47 $1.22 $1.97 $1.30 $1.09 ALL OTHER* 3.60 2.75 2.24 1.97 1.30 1.14 2PM-8PM 8PM-3AM 3AM-2PM 2PM-8PM 8PM-3AM 3AM-2PM AUSTRALIA (INCLUDING TASMANIA) INTERNATIONAL DIAL 1.93 1.26 1.10 1.71 1.12 0.99 ALL OTHER* 3.19 2.57 1.79 1.48 1.29 1.19 7AM-1PM 1PM-6PM 6PM-7AM 7AM-1PM 1PM-6PM 6PM-7AM AUSTRIA INTERNATIONAL DIAL 1.59 1.18 1.07 1.44 1.07 0.98 ALL OTHER* 2.08 1.54 1.32 1.46 1.09 0.99 8AM-5PM 5PM-11PM 11PM-8AM 8AM-5PM 5PM-11PM 11PM-8AM BAHAMAS INTERNATIONAL DIAL 1.28 0.92 0.84 1.14 0.84 0.76 ALL OTHER* 1.30 1.09 0.99 1.19 1.05 0.99 7AM-1PM 1PM-6PM 6PM-7AM 7AM-1PM 1PM-6PM 6PM-7AM BELGIUM INTERNATIONAL DIAL 1.84 1.17 1.03 1.65 1.04 0.94 ALL OTHER* 2.10 1.58 1.26 1.67 1.06 0.95 8AM-5PM 5PM-11PM 11PM-8AM 8AM-5PM 5PM-11PM 11PM-8AM BERMUDA INTERNATIONAL DIAL 1.34 1.02 0.94
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/SOCC/96socc.pdf
  • STATION COUNTRY STANDARD ECONOMY COUNTRY STANDARD ECONOMY ARGENTINA $1.93 $1.32ITALY $1.50 $1.07 AUSTRALIA 1.51 1.04JAMAICA 1.59 1.30 AUSTRIA 1.44 1.03JAPAN (INCLUDING OKINAWA) 1.45 1.05 BAHAMAS 1.15 0.92KOREA, REPUBLIC OF 1.82 1.28 BELGIUM 1.55 0.99NETHERLANDS 1.31 0.86 BERMUDA 1.25 1.03PAKISTAN 4.13 2.71 BRAZIL 1.84 1.34PANAMA, REPUBLIC OF 1.75 1.34 CHILE 1.74 1.37PERU 1.99 1.40 CHINA, PEOPLE'S REPUBLIC OF 2.60 2.01PHILIPPINES 2.17 1.46 COLOMBIA 1.86 1.36POLAND, REPUBLIC OF 1.57 1.27 COSTA RICA 1.65 1.23PORTUGAL (INCLUDING AZORES 1.65 1.07 DENMARK 1.46 0.96 AND MADEIRA ISLANDS) DOMINICAN REPUBLIC 1.58 1.32SAUDI ARABIA 2.10 1.65 ECUADOR 1.85 1.52SINGAPORE, REPUBLIC OF 1.65 1.09 EGYPT, ARAB REPUBLIC OF 2.17 1.75SOUTH AFRICA, REPUBLIC OF 1.75 1.31 EL SALVADOR 1.74 1.42SPAIN (INCLUDING BALEARIC 1.62 1.10 FRANCE 1.33 0.86 ISLANDS, CANARY ISLANDS,
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/SOCC/97socc.pdf
  • 0.80 1.55 0.87 1.67 0.60 1.10 0.55 1.05 1973 11/ 2.37 4.67 1.35 2.60 1.15 2.15 1.85 3.60 1.05 2.05 0.80 1.55 0.94 1.79 0.60 1.10 0.55 1.05 1974 2.37 4.67 1.35 2.60 1.15 2.15 1.85 3.60 1.05 2.05 0.80 1.55 0.94 1.79 0.60 1.10 0.55 1.05 1975 12/ 2.16 4.16 1.40 2.70 0.86 1.66 1.90 3.65 1.24 2.37 0.76 1.46 1.40 2.65 0.91 1.72 0.56 1.06 1976 13/ 2.06 3.96 1.34 2.57 0.82 1.58 1.86 3.56 1.21 2.31 0.74 1.42 1.55 2.95 1.01 1.92 0.62 1.18 1977 14/ 2.06 3.96 1.34 2.57 0.82 1.58 1.86 3.56 1.21 2.31 0.74 1.42 1.59 3.04 1.03 1.98 0.64 1.22 1978 2.06 3.96 1.34 2.57 0.82 1.58 1.86 3.56 1.21 2.31 0.74 1.42 1.59
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/SOCC/98SOCC.PDF
  • (1.00) (0.36) (0.01) (1.37) 11.2 AL ARIZONA 116.0 93.7 22.3 15.5 6.8 (4.47) (1.24) (0.47) (6.18) 13.0 AZ ARKANSAS 85.7 59.2 26.4 14.9 11.6 0.57 0.03 0.10 0.70 10.9 AR CALIFORNIA 1,289.7 944.0 345.6 258.9 86.7 3.04 3.05 2.98 9.07 77.7 CA COLORADO 288.8 102.5 186.2 137.4 48.8 20.06 6.80 7.31 34.17 14.6 CO CONNECTICUT 40.8 0.0 40.8 25.0 15.8 1.46 2.38 1.39 5.23 10.6 CT DELAWARE 26.4 16.7 9.7 4.1 5.6 0.34 0.35 0.18 0.87 4.7 DE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA 199.8 65.6 134.3 84.7 49.5 10.77 9.06 21.22 41.05 8.5 DC FLORIDA 839.0 523.7 315.3 247.3 68.1 1.98 (0.54) 2.16 3.60 64.5 FL GEORGIA 244.8 161.0 83.8 64.4 19.4 0.22 0.25 0.32 0.79 18.6 GA HAWAII 142.5 88.0 54.5 45.3
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/SOCC/99socc.pdf
  • 0.79 1.55 1.66 3.29 1.00 1.98 0.67 1.32 Sprint 2.17 4.10 1.34 2.56 0.91 1.73 1.93 3.70 1.20 2.30 0.81 1.56 1.76 3.34 1.07 2.05 0.71 1.36 1986 AT&T 1.99 3.79 1.19 2.27 0.88 1.67 1.79 3.44 1.07 2.06 0.79 1.51 1.55 2.95 0.93 1.77 0.68 1.30 MCI 1.89 3.68 1.16 2.24 0.84 1.62 1.72 3.35 1.04 2.03 0.76 1.48 1.46 2.85 0.86 1.70 0.62 1.23 Sprint 1.88 3.67 1.15 2.23 0.83 1.61 1.71 3.34 1.03 2.02 0.75 1.47 1.45 2.84 0.85 1.68 0.61 1.22 1987 AT&T 1.58 3.08 0.98 1.91 0.74 1.45 1.50 2.95 0.93 1.83 0.71 1.39 1.23 2.38 0.76 1.48 0.58 1.12 MCI 1.53 3.02 0.96 1.89 0.71 1.42 1.46 2.90 0.90 1.80 0.69 1.37 1.17 2.32 0.71
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Consumer_Information/Orders/2000/da000518.doc
  • and 251(a)(2) of the Communications Act of 1934, as Enacted by the Telecommunications Act of 1996 Access to Telecommunications Service, Telecommunications Equipment and Customer Premises Equipment by Persons with Disabilities WT Docket No. 96-198 ORDER AUTHORIZING LATE-FILED REPLY COMMENTS Adopted: March 6, 2000 Released: March 7, 2000 By the Deputy Chief, Consumer Information Bureau: I. Introduction 1. Pursuant to Section 1.46 of the Commission's rules, we hereby authorize the American Foundation for the Blind to submit late-filed reply comments in the above-captioned proceeding. II. Discussion 2. On September 29, 1999, the Commission released a Report and Order and Further Notice of Inquiry implementing Section 255 of the Telecommunications Act of 1996, in which it solicited comments on certain disability access issues
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Orders/1997/da970023.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Orders/1997/da970023.txt http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Orders/1997/da970023.wp
  • DLR ARE GRANTED to the extent indicated herein and that the date for filing reply comments relating to the Sixth Further Notice IS EXTENDED to January 24, 1997. This action is taken pursuant to authority provided in Sections 4(i) and 303(r) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 154(i) and 303(r), and Sections 0.31, 0.241 and 1.46 of the Commission's rules, 47 CFR �� 0.31, 0.241 and 1.46. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Richard M. Smith Chief Office of Engineering and Technology 4
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Orders/1999/da992394.doc
  • time for filing reply comments in the above captioned proceeding IS EXTENDED to November 19, 1999. 3. This action is taken pursuant to the authority found in Sections 4(i), 301, 302, 303(e), 303(f), and 303(r) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 154(i), 301, 302, 303(e), 303(f), and 303(r); and pursuant to Sections 0.31, 0.241 and 1.46 of the Commission's Rules, 47 CFR �� 0.31, 0.241 and 1.46. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Dale N. Hatfield Chief Office of Engineering and Technology Federal Communications Commission DA 99-2394 ! 1 A Q a q �O��� ` � � �O��� �O��� � �
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Orders/2000/da000486.doc
  • reply comment deadline. IT IS ORDERED that the time for filing reply comments in the above captioned proceeding IS EXTENDED to March 14, 2000. 3. This action is taken pursuant to the authority found in Section 4(i) and 303 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 154(i) and 303; and pursuant to Sections 0.31, 0.241 and 1.46 of the Commission's Rules, 47 CFR �� 0.31, 0.241 and 1.46. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Dale Hatfield Chief, Office of Engineering and Technology (continued....) Federal Communications Commission Federal Communications Commission DA 00-486 @& �0� �0� �0� �0� �0� �0� ��� <
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Orders/2000/da001243.doc
  • time for filing reply comments in the above captioned proceeding IS EXTENDED to June 22, 2000. 3. This action is taken pursuant to the authority found in Sections 4(I), 301, 302, 303(e), 303(f), and 303(R) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 154(I), 301, 302, 303(e), 303(f), and 303(R); and pursuant to Sections 0.31, 0.241 and 1.46 of the Commission's Rules, 47 CFR �� 0.31, 0.241 and 1.46. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Dale N. Hatfied Chief Office of Engineering and Technology See, FCC Public Notice Report No. 2405, April 20, 2000. See, Amendment of Parts 2 and 95 of the Commission's Rules to Create a Wireless Medical Telemetry Service, Notice of Proposed Rule Making, ET Docket 99-255, 14
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Public_Notices/2000/da001673.doc
  • petitions. Accordingly, we are establishing that common comment date as August 28, 2000, thereby extending the date for comments to be filed on the SIA Petition. This action is taken pursuant to authority found in Sections 4(i) and 303 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 154(i) and 303; and pursuant to Sections 0.31, 0.241, and 1.46 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.31, 0.241, and 1.46. For further information on these two petitions, contact Rodney Small, Office of Engineering and Technology, 202-418-2452 . See Report No. 2424. PUBLIC NOTICE Federal Communications Commission 445 12th St., S.W. Washington, D.C. 20554 News Media Information 202 / 418-0500 Fax-On-Demand 202 / 418-2830 TTY 202 / 418-2555 Internet: http://www.fcc.gov
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/International/Orders/1999/da992067.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/International/Orders/1999/da992067.txt
  • Commission does not routinely grant extensions of time, we find that a brief extension in this instance is warranted in the interest of developing a complete record in this proceeding. 6. This action is taken pursuant to authority found in Section 4 (i) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. � 154(i), and Sections 0.51, 0.261, and 1.46 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � � 0.51, 0.261 and 1.46. 7. Accordingly, EchoStar Satellite Corporation's Motion for Extension of Time filed October 1, 1999 IS GRANTED. EchoStar Satellite Corporation shall submit the information requested by the International Bureau in its September 23, 1999 letter on or before October 7, 1999. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Thomas S. Tycz Chief, Satellite
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/International/Orders/2000/da000009.doc
  • extensions of time, we find that a brief extension in this case is warranted. Therefore, we will grant the extension request and extend the deadline for filing oppositions to January 18, 2000. 4. This action is taken pursuant to authority found in Section 4(i) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. � 154(i), and Sections 0.261 and 1.46 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.261 and 1.46. 5. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, that the Motion for Extension of Time filed by the American Distance Education Consortium IS GRANTED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Thomas S. Tycz Chief, Satellite and Radiocommunication Division International Bureau (continued....) Federal Communications Commission Federal Communications Commission DA 00-9 t u @&
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/International/Orders/2000/da000094.doc
  • there to access a U.S. authorized and Loral-owned satellite. . We find it is in the public interest to grant Loral an extension of time in which to file comments on the above captioned application. Therefore, we extend the date to file comments on W4's application until January 30, 2000. . This action is taken pursuant to Sections 0.51, 0.261, 1.46 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � � 0.51, 0.261, 1.46. . Accordingly, Loral's Request for Extension of Time is GRANTED and the deadline for filing comments on the above captioned application is EXTENDED from January 8, 2000, until January 30, 2000. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Thomas S. Tycz Chief, Satellite and Radiocommication Division, International Bureau Federal Communications Commission DA 00-94
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/International/Orders/2000/fcc00277.doc
  • 28, 1998). The Petitioners state that they are appealing that decision. Letter from Raymond G. Bender, Counsel for Comsat and Lockheed Martin, to Magalie Roman Salas, Secretary, FCC (June 27, 2000); Letter from Keith H. Fagan, Attorney for Comsat, to Magalie Roman Salas, Secretary, FCC (June 26, 2000). FCC Public Notice Request No. SAT-00040, April 4, 2000. See 47 CFR 1.46. In re Comsat Corporation, 13 FCC Rcd 2714 (1998)(Consolidated Order). Specifically, LRT repeats allegations that Comsat (1) violated Commission's structure policy (1-SAT-ISP-96); failed to obtain Commission approval under Section 201(c) of the Satellite Act of its acquisition of Belcom stock and other subsidiaries (117 SAT DR-96 and 118-SAT-DR-96); (2) should be enjoined from payment of dividends on retained earnings (64-SAT-DR-97
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/International/Orders/2000/fcc00337.doc
  • Order). Comsat also filed with each Opposition a ``Motion for Acceptance'' of its pleading because the petitioners' filings are not specifically contemplated by the Commission's Rules. The response filed by Litigation Trust Recovery, William J. Hallenbeck and William Whitely was filed on June 29, 2000 - over two years after Comsat filed the pleadings to which it responds. Under Section 1.46 of the Rules, the Petitioner must seek permission to file late filed pleadings demonstrating an emergency situation. It has made no attempt at any such showing. Moreover, the Petitioners filings appear to have been mailed directly to a Commission staff member rather than filed with the Secretary of the FCC pursuant to Section 1.106(i) of the Commission's Rules. We will
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/International/Orders/2000/fcc00340.doc
  • (Int'l Bur., rel. July 5, 2000) (Comsat Confidentiality Order). Comsat Confidentiality Order at para. 6. On July 24, 2000, Comsat filed a motion to extend the time to file its Response, and for Lockheed Martin to file its response, from July 24 to July 25, 2000. The Commission does not grant motions for extension of time routinely. 47 C.F.R. � 1.46(a). In this case, however, Comsat explained that computer system "crashes" caused its attorneys significant difficulties with word processing and printing Comsat's response, and for sharing drafts with Lockheed Martin's attorneys. Comsat Motion at 1. Because Comsat provided good cause for an extension, and because this one-day extension does not prejudice any other party in this proceeding, we grant Comsat's motion.
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/MB/Orders/2002/da020946.pdf
  • 20554 In the Matter of Rules and Policies Concerning Multiple Ownership of Radio Broadcast Stations in Local Markets Definition of Radio Markets ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) MM Docket No. 01-317 MM Docket No. 00-244 ORDER Adopted: April 23, 2002 Released: April 23, 2002 By the Chief, Media Bureau: 1. On April 17, 2002, pursuant to section 1.46 of the Commission's Rules,1 the Office of Communication of the United Church of Christ ("UCC") filed a "Motion for Extension of Reply Comment Deadline" in this proceeding. Previously, on January 23, 2002, and on March 8, 2002, we granted motions and extended our comment and reply comment deadlines.2 The current deadline to file reply comments is April 24, 2002. UCC
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Notices/1997/fcc97360.pdf
  • publish a public notice announcing the acceptance for filing of all applications submitted during the initial window, as amended during the 60-day period. Petitioners propose that all petitions to deny and comments on the applications be filed within 60 days of the second public notice. Under Petitioners' proposal, each application submitted during the initial window would 48 47 C.F.R. � 1.46. 25 Federal Communications Commission FCC 97-360 then be automatically granted on the 61st day after the Commission shall have given notice of its acceptance for filing, unless prior to such date an interested party files a formal petition to deny or the Commission notifies the applicant that its application will not be automatically granted. Following Petitioners' plan, on the 61st
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Orders/1999/da992453.doc
  • of the Rules. Even though Gold Country may not have timely served the other parties with a copy of its Petition for Reconsideration, it did serve the parties with a copy of its Supplement to Petition for Reconsideration and its Reply to Opposition thereby alerting parties of the filing of its Petition for Reconsideration. A failure to comply with Sections 1.46(g) and 1.106(f) of the Rules has not delayed resolution of this proceeding and we believe that an issue of interference to Station KNCO should be considered on its merits. Nevertheless, we would like to make some observations concerning the service requirements set forth in Sections 1.47(g) and 1.106(f) of the Rules and the filing of the Petition for Reconsideration by
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Miscellaneous/Open_Proceedings/op990326.html http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Miscellaneous/Open_Proceedings/op990326.wp
  • measures in the 508, 617, 781, and 978 area codes in eastern Massachusetts. Comments due April 5; replies April 19. Contact: Al McCloud, Network Services Division at (202) 418-2320; TTY: (202) 418-0404. Order 3/5/99 (adopted 3/5/99); DA 99-463 Comsat Mobil Communications Request for Extension of Time for Filing Cost Allocation Manual Audit Report Granted pursuant to Sections 0.91, 0291, and 1.46 of the Commission's Rules CMC's request for an extension of time until June 1, 1999, to file its independent cost allocation manual audit report. CC 97-172; Order 3/8/99 (adopted 3/8/99); DA 99-468 Petition of US West Communications, Inc. for Forbearance Extended to June 9, 1999, the date on which the petition seeking forbearance filed by US West shall be deemed
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Miscellaneous/Open_Proceedings/op990402.html http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Miscellaneous/Open_Proceedings/op990402.wp
  • measures in the 508, 617, 781, and 978 area codes in eastern Massachusetts. Comments due April 5; replies April 19. Contact: Al McCloud, Network Services Division at (202) 418-2320; TTY: (202) 418-0404. Order 3/5/99 (adopted 3/5/99); DA 99-463 Comsat Mobil Communications Request for Extension of Time for Filing Cost Allocation Manual Audit Report Granted pursuant to Sections 0.91, 0291, and 1.46 of the Commission's Rules CMC's request for an extension of time until June 1, 1999, to file its independent cost allocation manual audit report. CC 97-172; Order 3/8/99 (adopted 3/8/99); DA 99-468 Petition of US West Communications, Inc. for Forbearance Extended to June 9, 1999, the date on which the petition seeking forbearance filed by US West shall be deemed
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Miscellaneous/Open_Proceedings/op990409.html http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Miscellaneous/Open_Proceedings/op990409.wp
  • measures in the 508, 617, 781, and 978 area codes in eastern Massachusetts. Comments due April 5*; replies April 19. Contact: Al McCloud, Network Services Division at (202) 418-2320; TTY: (202) 418-0404. Order 3/5/99 (adopted 3/5/99); DA 99-463 Comsat Mobil Communications Request for Extension of Time for Filing Cost Allocation Manual Audit Report Granted pursuant to Sections 0.91, 0291, and 1.46 of the Commission's Rules CMC's request for an extension of time until June 1, 1999, to file its independent cost allocation manual audit report. CC 97-172; Order 3/8/99 (adopted 3/8/99); DA 99-468 Petition of US West Communications, Inc. for Forbearance Extended to June 9, 1999, the date on which the petition seeking forbearance filed by US West shall be deemed
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Miscellaneous/Open_Proceedings/op990416.html http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Miscellaneous/Open_Proceedings/op990416.txt http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Miscellaneous/Open_Proceedings/op990416.wp
  • measures in the 508, 617, 781, and 978 area codes in eastern Massachusetts. Comments due April 5*; replies April 19. Contact: Al McCloud, Network Services Division at (202) 418-2320; TTY: (202) 418-0404. Order 3/5/99 (adopted 3/5/99); DA 99-463 Comsat Mobil Communications Request for Extension of Time for Filing Cost Allocation Manual Audit Report Granted pursuant to Sections 0.91, 0291, and 1.46 of the Commission's Rules CMC's request for an extension of time until June 1, 1999, to file its independent cost allocation manual audit report. CC 97-172; Order 3/8/99 (adopted 3/8/99); DA 99-468 Petition of US West Communications, Inc. for Forbearance Extended to June 9, 1999, the date on which the petition seeking forbearance filed by US West shall be deemed
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Miscellaneous/Open_Proceedings/op990507.html http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Miscellaneous/Open_Proceedings/op990507.wp
  • on Telephone Service for Indians on Reservations; Set for March 23 in Chandler Arizona. Comment period closes May 28, 1999. Contact: Eric Jensen at (202) 418-0990 or Belford Lawson at (202) 418-7264. Order 3/5/99 (adopted 3/5/99); DA 99-463 Comsat Mobil Communications Request for Extension of Time for Filing Cost Allocation Manual Audit Report Granted pursuant to Sections 0.91, 0291, and 1.46 of the Commission's Rules CMC's request for an extension of time until June 1, 1999, to file its independent cost allocation manual audit report. CC 97-172; Order 3/8/99 (adopted 3/8/99); DA 99-468 Petition of US West Communications, Inc. for Forbearance Extended to June 9, 1999, the date on which the petition seeking forbearance filed by US West shall be deemed
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Miscellaneous/Open_Proceedings/op990514.html http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Miscellaneous/Open_Proceedings/op990514.wp
  • on Telephone Service for Indians on Reservations; Set for March 23 in Chandler Arizona. Comment period closes May 28, 1999. Contact: Eric Jensen at (202) 418-0990 or Belford Lawson at (202) 418-7264. Order 3/5/99 (adopted 3/5/99); DA 99-463 Comsat Mobil Communications Request for Extension of Time for Filing Cost Allocation Manual Audit Report Granted pursuant to Sections 0.91, 0291, and 1.46 of the Commission's Rules CMC's request for an extension of time until June 1, 1999, to file its independent cost allocation manual audit report. CC 97-172; Order 3/8/99 (adopted 3/8/99); DA 99-468 Petition of US West Communications, Inc. for Forbearance Extended to June 9, 1999, the date on which the petition seeking forbearance filed by US West shall be deemed
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Miscellaneous/Open_Proceedings/op990521.html http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Miscellaneous/Open_Proceedings/op990521.wp
  • on Telephone Service for Indians on Reservations; Set for March 23 in Chandler Arizona. Comment period closes May 28, 1999. Contact: Eric Jensen at (202) 418-0990 or Belford Lawson at (202) 418-7264. Order 3/5/99 (adopted 3/5/99); DA 99-463 Comsat Mobil Communications Request for Extension of Time for Filing Cost Allocation Manual Audit Report Granted pursuant to Sections 0.91, 0291, and 1.46 of the Commission's Rules CMC's request for an extension of time until June 1, 1999, to file its independent cost allocation manual audit report. CC 97-172; Order 3/8/99 (adopted 3/8/99); DA 99-468 Petition of US West Communications, Inc. for Forbearance Extended to June 9, 1999, the date on which the petition seeking forbearance filed by US West shall be deemed
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/OGC/Notices/1997/fcc97113.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/OGC/Notices/1997/fcc97113.txt http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/OGC/Notices/1997/fcc97113.wp
  • * * * Part 1 of Title 47 of the Code of Federal Regulations is amended as follows: Part 1 -- PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE 1. The authority citation for Part 1 continues to read as follows: AUTHORITY: 47 U.S.C. 151, 154, 207, 303 and 309(j) unless otherwise noted. 47 CFR Part 1 is amended to read as follows: 2. Section 1.46 is amended by revising paragraphs (b) and (c) to read as follows: '' 1.46 Motions for extension of time. * * * (b) Motions for extension of time in which to file responses to petitions for rulemaking, replies to such responses, comments filed in response to notice of proposed rulemaking, replies to such comments and other filings in rulemaking proceedings
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/OGC/Orders/1998/fcc98056.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/OGC/Orders/1998/fcc98056.wp
  • official custodian of the Commission's documents and shall have authority to appoint a deputy or deputies for the purposes of custody and certification of documents located in Gettysburg, Pennsylvania or other established locations. The Secretary is delegated authority to rule on requests for extensions of time based on operational problems associated with the Commission's electronic comment filing system. See � 1.46. 3. Section 0.401 is amended by adding (a)(1)(iii) to read as follows: � 0.401 Location of Commission Offices. * * * * * (iii) Electronic filings, where permitted, must be transmitted as specified by the Commission or relevant Bureau or Office. * * * * * Part 1 of Title 47 of the Code of Federal Regulations is amended as
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Orders/1999/da991861.doc
  • to the Commission's consideration of the issues. 4. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that the Request for Extension of Time to File Reply Comments filed by the Land Mobile Communications Council on September 8, 1999, IS GRANTED. Interested parties may file reply comments on or before September 30, 1999. 5. This action is taken pursuant to the authority provided in Section 1.46 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.46 and under delegated authority pursuant to Sections 0.131 and 0.331 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.131, 0.331. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Amy J. Zoslov Chief, Auctions and Industry Analysis Division Wireless Telecommunications Bureau See Implementation of Sections 309(j) and 337 of the Communications Act of 1934 as Amended, WT Docket No.
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Orders/2000/da000374.doc
  • were we to accept Desert's Petition, we would find it moot. In another proceeding, after considering and rejecting arguments identical to those raised by Desert in its Petition here, we granted Mineral's application. III. Ordering Clause 5. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to Section 4(i) of the Communications Act, as amended, 47 U.S.C. � 154(i), and sections 0.331 and 1.46(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.331 and 1.46(a), the Motion filed by Desert on December 30, 1994, is DENIED. 6. IT IS ALSO ORDERED that, pursuant to Sections 4(i) and 309(d), of the Communications Act, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 154(i) and 309(d), and sections 0.331 and 22.130(c) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.331 and 22.130(c),
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Orders/2000/da000501.doc
  • our rules do not provide for routine grants of extensions of time, we agree that WTC should be given extra time to respond under these circumstances and hereby grant WTC's request to extend the time for filing oppositions to the petitions for reconsideration in this matter to March 6, 2000. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 0.131, 0.331 and 1.46 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.131, 0.331, 1.46, that the Motion for Extension of Time, filed by Wilmington Trust Company, IS GRANTED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION William W. Kunze Deputy Chief Commercial Wireless Division Wireless Telecommunications Bureau See 47 C.F.R. � 1.106(f). See 47 C.F.R. � 1.46(a). Federal Communications Commission DA 00-501 - Federal Communications Commission DA 00-501 0
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Orders/2000/da001785.doc
  • 20554 In re Applications of CALIFORNIA WIRELESS, INC. For Renewal and Modification of Paging and Radiotelephone Service Stations KNKI691, KNKG857, KNKM824, and KNKO310 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) File Nos. 0000101622, 0000101628, 0000101646, and 0000101817 Adopted: August 4, 2000 Released: August 7, 2000 By the Chief, Commercial Wireless Division, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau: 1. Pursuant to section 1.46(c) of the Commission's rules, we have received three motions for extension of time in which to file pleadings in the above-captioned proceeding. California Wireless, Inc. (CW) filed a Consent Request for Extension of Time (Consent Request) from May 25, 2000 until June 16, 2000 to file an Opposition to the Petition to Deny the captioned applications filed by Link Two
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Orders/2000/da002395.doc
  • grant of a three week extension, we believe Nextel would not be prejudiced by the grant of a three week extension. In view of the foregoing, we conclude that granting the Motion would serve the public interest. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to Section 4(i) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. � 154(i), and Section 1.46 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.46, the Motion for Extension of Time filed by the State of Ohio on October 13, 2000, IS GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the deadline date for filing reply comments to the comments filed in the above-captioned matter pursuant to Public Notice, DA 00-2167, is November 7, 2000. This action is taken
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Orders/2000/fcc00143.doc
  • the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 154(i), 155(c)(5), and Section 1.115(g) of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.115, the Application for Review filed by Linda Chester on March 10, 2000, IS DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to Section 4(i) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. � 154(i), and Section 1.46 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.46, the Motion for Extension of Time filed by Ronna L. Sauro on March 27, 2000, IS DISMISSED AS MOOT. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Magalie Roman Salas Secretary Linda Chester Application for Review (filed Mar. 10, 2000). On March 27, 2000, Ronna L. Sauro filed a Motion for Extension of Time to file a
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Public_Notices/2000/da000271.doc
  • Deadline for Comments to SBC Communications Inc.'s and Nextel Communications, Inc.s' Request for Waiver of the Commission's Rules, DA 00-191, filed by NTCA on February 4, 2000; Request for Additional Time to File Comments, DA 00-191, filed by Advocacy on February 7, 2000; Request for Extension of Time, DA 00-191, filed by RCA on February 9, 2000. 47 C.F.R. � 1.46. To the extent that the Bankruptcy Court's February 7, 2000 order may have constrained the Commission in acting on SBC's and Nextel's petitions, the Second Circuit Court of Appeals' order of February 10, 2000 clarifies that the Commission may take this action. See ``Wireless Telecommunications Bureau Seeks Comment on Nextel Communications, Inc.'s Petition Regarding PCS C and F Block Spectrum;
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Public_Notices/2000/da000273.doc
  • Incorporated's Petition for Declaratory Ruling Seeking 700 MHz Band License Pursuant to Ruling of U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals,'' Public Notice, DA 00-219 (rel. February 4, 2000). Id. Bell Atlantic Mobile, Inc., Emergency Motion for Extension of Time, filed February 9, 2000. U S WEST Wireless LLC, Emergency Motion for Extension of Time, filed February 10, 2000. 47 C.F.R. � 1.46. See ``Wireless Telecommunications Bureau Seeks Comment on QUALCOMM Incorporated's Petition for Declaratory Ruling Seeking 700 MHz Band License Pursuant to Ruling of U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals,'' DA 00-219 (rel. February 4, 2000). PUBLIC NOTICE Federal Communications Commission 445 12th St., S.W. Washington, D.C. 20554 News Media Information 202 / 418-0500 Fax-On-Demand 202 / 418-2830 TTY 202 / 418-2555 Internet:
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Public_Notices/2000/da001289.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Public_Notices/2000/da001289.txt
  • not routinely grant motions for extension of time, we believe that Bergen has presented good cause for approval of such a motion. We therefore conclude that a grant of the Motion would be in the public interest. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to Section 4(i) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. � 154(i), and Section 1.46 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.46, the motion for extension of time to file a protest of the Order on Reconsideration and Order on Modification filed by the Bergen County, New Jersey Police Department on June 2, 2000, IS GRANTED. For the forgoing reasons, we hereby extend the time for filing a protest to the Order on Modification
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireline_Competition/Orders/2002/da020991.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireline_Competition/Orders/2002/da020991.txt
  • the deadline for filing reply comments in this proceeding. Because of the complexity and volume of the issues raised in the initial comments filed in this proceeding, we find it appropriate to extend the deadline for reply comments to June 5, 2002, so that parties can more thoroughly address all of the issues raised by commenters. 1 47 C.F.R. � 1.46(a). Federal Communications Commission DA 02-991 2 B. Revised Comment Filing Procedures 3. We request that interested parties that choose to file by paper file an original and nineteen copies of each. Previously we had requested an original and four copies. Parties may also continue to file using the Commission's Electronic Comment Filing System (ECFS). All other comment filing procedures previously
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireline_Competition/Orders/2002/fcc02118.pdf
  • 0 0 1.69 0 0 0 2.04 PR-4-08-2341 % Missed Appt. � Customer � Late Order Conf. 0 0 0 0 0 PR-6 � Installation Quality PR-6-01-2341 % Install. Troubles Reported within 30 Days 1.94 2.76 1.41 2.06 1.3 1.18 1.04 0 0.61 1 PR-6-03-2341 % Install. Troubles Reported w/in 30 Days - FOK/TOK/CPE 4.07 1.66 3.72 3.09 2.44 0.59 1.46 2.67 PR-8 � Open Orders in a Hold Status PR-8-01-2341 Open Orders in a Hold Status > 30 Days 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PR-8-02-2341 Open Orders in a Hold Status > 90 Days 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Federal Communications Commission FCC 02-118 C-14 Metric Metric September October November
• http://www.fcc.gov/Daily_Releases/Daily_Digest/1999/dd990309.html
  • Common Carrier Bureau. Adopted: March 8, 1999. by Recon. of Decision. (DA No. 99-475). CCB Internet URL: [10]http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/da990475.wp ADDENDA: The following items, released March 5, 1999, did not appear in Digest No. 43: ----------------------------------------------------------------------- --- TEXTS ----------------------------------------------------------------------- --- COMSAT MOBIL COMMUNICATIONS REQUEST FOR EXTENSION OF TIME FOR FILING COST ALLOCATION MANUAL AUDIT REPORT. Granted pursuant to Sections 0.91, 0291, and 1.46 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. Section 0.91, 0.291, and 1.46 CMC's request for an extension of time until June 1, 1999, to file its independent cost allocation manual audit report. Action by Chief, Accounting Safeguards Division, Common Carrier Bureau. Adopted: March 5, 1999. by Order. (DA No. 99-463). CCB Internet URL: [11]http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/da990463.wp DEER LODGE, HAMILTON AND SHELBY, MONTANA. Proposed
• http://www.fcc.gov/Speeches/Kennard/Statements/2001/CETVReport97-99.doc
  • presents various statistics for each of the ten station-groups where j = 1,2,...,10. TABLE A1 core hours preemption n(j) N(j) p(j) fpcf(j) m(j) v(j) sm(j) m(j) v(j) sm(j) ABC 20 186 .154 0.89 3.82 0.281 0.11 9.70 43.972 1.40 CBS 20 184 .153 0.89 3.06 0.023 0.03 7.84 19.882 0.94 NBC 20 188 .156 0.89 3.32 0.274 0.11 12.36 47.712 1.46 FOX 10 163 .135 0.94 4.48 1.013 0.31 0.84 0.811 0.27 UPN 10 80 .066 0.88 5.25 5.107 0.67 0.54 0.510 0.21 WB 10 63 .052 0.84 4.34 1.423 0.35 0.55 0.287 0.16 PAX 10 65 .054 0.85 3.39 0.381 0.18 1.06 3.908 0.58 UNI/TEL 10 38 .032 0.74 3.39 0.659 0.22 2.26 5.526 0.64 Religious 10 41 .034 0.76
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2002/DA-02-3501A1.html
  • questions, please contact Hugh L. Boyle at (202) 418-7147 or Mika Savir at (202) 418-0384. Sincerely, Maureen F. Del Duca Deputy Chief Investigations and Hearings Division Enforcement Bureau _________________________ 1 See Public Notice, ``Enforcement Bureau Seeks Comments on SBC Communications Section 272 Compliance Biennial Audit Report in CC Docket No. 96-150,'' DA 02-2925, rel. Oct. 31, 2002. 2 47 C.F.R. 1.46(a). References 1. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3501A1.pdf 2. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3501A1.doc
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2003/FCC-03-19A1.html
  • KARV(AM), Russellville, Arkansas; KARV-FM, Ola, Arkansas; and KLTK(AM) and KURM-FM, Southwest City, Missouri. 2 On June 25, 2002, Family Vision requested an extension of time until July 12, 2002, to file its opposition pleading, arguing that newly hired counsel needed additional time to prepare its filing. The Commission's policy is not to grant extensions of time routinely. See 47 C.F.R. 1.46(a). In this case, however, we find that the public interest is served by permitting the late-filing so that we may have a better understanding of the record. 3 In Xavier, the Commission acknowledged that it can at times be difficult to distinguish between language that identifies versus that which promotes, and that it expects only that licensees exercise ``reasonable good
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-09-433A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-09-433A1.pdf
  • a Reply to Opposition to Consolidated Motion for Further Extension of Time (the ``Reply to Opposition to Extension Motion'') filed by Living Proof; and a Joint Request for Approval of Settlement Agreement (the ``Joint Request'') filed by Living Proof and the University. The Commission does not routinely grant extensions of time in which to file pleadings. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.46(a). It has done so, however, when, as here, parties require additional time to conclude a settlement agreement. See, e.g., Port Huron Family Radio, Inc., Memorandum Opinion and Order, 4 FCC Rcd 5617 (Rev. Bd. 1989). Accordingly, we grant the First, Second and Third Extension Motions. We dismiss Living Proof's Reply to Opposition to Extension Motion because � 1.45(d) of the
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-12-2A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-12-2A1.pdf
  • 2007 2.31 2.46 2.51 (98) (73) (59) 2009 1.70 1.76 1.77 (103) (68) (75) Religion Format Market Measure 2005 2.14 1.65 1.30 * (55) (41) (52) 2007 1.53 1.85 1.33 (39) (32) (62) 2009 1.18 1.59 0.88 (34) (36) (57) Contour Measure 2005 1.70 1.55 1.93 (73) (42) (33) 2007 1.19 1.51 1.95 * (53) (40) (40) 2009 0.88 1.22 1.46 * (53) (31) (43) Table 11 (continued) Average Full-Service Commercial FM Stations' Revenue per Adult by Format Year No LPFM One LPFM Two or More LPFM News/Talk/Sports Format Market Measure 2005 3.02 2.35 2.46 (35) (20) (44) 2007 2.83 2.87 2.19 (25) (33) (71) 2009 1.94 1.94 1.66 (38) (46) (83) Contour Measure 2005 2.31 2.80 3.03 (45) (30) (24)
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-12-949A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-12-949A1.pdf
  • 1 and 2. CBC also suggests therein that a monetary forfeiture (presumably for construction without authority after permit expiration) would be more appropriate than loss of the construction permit. Id. at 8, n.7. See 47 C.F.R. �� 1.4(b)(2) and 1.115(d). The 30th day fell on a Saturday, so the pleading was due the first business day thereafter. Id. at �� 1.46(a) and (c). April Petition, n.1. Id. citing Charles T. Crawford, Order, 17 FCC Rcd 2014 (2002) (``Crawford'') and MTD, Inc., Memorandum Opinion and Order, 6 FCC Rcd 34 (1991) (``MTD''). Although CBC captioned the April Petition as a ``Petition for Waiver and Reinstatement,'' the filing challenges the conclusions reached in the Letter Decision, relies on the same facts raised previously,
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/FCC-08-13A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/FCC-08-13A1.pdf
  • C.F.R. � 1.115(c). Moreover, that argument largely seeks a fundamental change to the ``period of construction'' rule in 47 C.F.R. � 73.3598, rather than making a legal claim tailored to the instant proceeding. Opposition to Application for Review at 1. See JNE Reply at 2. Opposition to Petition for Reconsideration at 2. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.106(g). 47 C.F.R. � 1.46(c). 47 C.F.R. � 73.3598(b). Id. We reiterate that the tolling provision of 47 C.F.R. � 73.3598 is inapplicable if there have already been three unencumbered years to construct a station. See Texas Grace Communications, Inc., Memorandum Opinion and Order, 20 FCC Rcd 4820, 4824 (2005) (permittee not eligible for tolling because it previously had received three unencumbered years). The KSDG(AM)
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/FCC-08-144A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/FCC-08-144A1.pdf
  • (Mar. 2, 2006); Reply (Mar. 14, 2006). See 47 C.F.R. �� 1.115(d) and 1.4(b). See Crystal Broadcast Partners, Memorandum Opinion and Order, 11 FCC Rcd 4680, 4681 (1996) (citing MTD, Inc., Memorandum Opinion and Order, 6 FCC Rcd 34, 35 n.2 (1991) and Hancock Communications, Inc., Memorandum Opinion and Order, 10 FCC Rcd 13068, 13069 (1995)). See 47 C.F.R. � 1.46(c). Id. at � 1.46(a). See 47 C.F.R. � 1.46. See also 47 C.F.R. �� 1.115(d) and 1.4(b). See Hillebrand Broadcasting, Inc., Order, 1 FCC Rcd 419, 420 n.6 (1986). Prosecution of an application includes timely compliance with both procedural and substantive rules. Id. at 419. See 47 C.F.R. � 73.3573. Compare MTD, Inc., Memorandum Opinion and Order, 6 FCC Rcd
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/FCC-08-53A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/FCC-08-53A1.pdf
  • Commission review of those decisions. See Opposition to Request for Leave at 3. The May Decision was a staff letter of the type not generally released or placed on a public notice, but rather mailed to parties to the proceeding. New World was not a party. See Broadcast Applications, Public Notice, Report No. 25749 (June 3, 2004). 47 C.F.R. � 1.46(c). See June Decision at 2. See 47 C.F.R. � 73.3571(a)(1) (2004). WDMV(AM)'s operations from the Damascus Site would not provide the community of Walkersville with the requisite city grade signal coverage. Birach failed to take advantage of its opportunity to file a major change application for WDMV(AM) during the AM filing window that opened on January 26, 2004. See Revision
• http://www.fcc.gov/ib/sand/mniab/traffic/files/ITRND01.pdf
  • Data 6/ Number End-UserPayouts Retained Number Receipts End-UserPayout Retained ReceiptsNet Retained of Billed to Revenues of from Billed to Revenues from Revenues Minutes RevenuesForeign Minutes Foreign RevenuesForeign Foreign for all U.S. 4/ Carriers Carriers 6/ Carriers Carriers and Foreign Minutes 1964 20.2 $62.9 $30.3 $32.6 12.0 $19.6 $3.11 $1.50 $1.62 $1.63 $1.62 1965 25.5 78.2 37.2 41.1 15.4 24.7 3.07 1.46 1.61 1.60 1.61 1966 32.3 100.1 47.6 52.5 18.9 30.1 3.10 1.47 1.63 1.59 1.61 1967 39.7 114.2 54.6 59.6 23.4 31.8 2.88 1.38 1.50 1.36 1.45 1968 46.4 126.9 61.5 65.4 28.2 40.0 2.73 1.33 1.41 1.42 1.41 1969 64.6 172.0 82.7 89.4 38.3 51.6 2.66 1.28 1.38 1.35 1.37 1970 81.1 196.6 98.9 97.7 51.0 59.8 2.43 1.22
• http://www.fcc.gov/mb/peer_review/prlpfm_rpt_economic_study.pdf
  • 2007 2.31 2.46 2.51 (98) (73) (59) 2009 1.70 1.76 1.77 (103) (68) (75) Religion Format Market Measure 2005 2.14 1.65 1.30 * (55) (41) (52) 2007 1.53 1.85 1.33 (39) (32) (62) 2009 1.18 1.59 0.88 (34) (36) (57) Contour Measure 2005 1.70 1.55 1.93 (73) (42) (33) 2007 1.19 1.51 1.95 * (53) (40) (40) 2009 0.88 1.22 1.46 * (53) (31) (43) Federal Communications Commission DA 12-2 89 Table 11 (continued) Average Full-Service Commercial FM Stations' Revenue per Adult by Format Year No LPFM One LPFM Two or More LPFM News/Talk/Sports Format Market Measure 2005 3.02 2.35 2.46 (35) (20) (44) 2007 2.83 2.87 2.19 (25) (33) (71) 2009 1.94 1.94 1.66 (38) (46) (83) Contour Measure 2005
• http://www.fcc.gov/mb/peer_review/prrespstudy4c.pdf
  • change is made.9 I again thank Scott for his time and comments. Table 1 Updated Logistic Fixed Effects Regression Results Without Broadband Lines Per Person With Broadband Lines Per Person Variable Coefficient P-value Odds Ratio Coefficient P-value Odds Ratio News Format Prior Period 6.59*** 0.00 727.49 6.59*** 0.000 725.18 AM Station 1.81*** 0.00 6.10 1.85*** 0.000 6.35 Crossowned With Newspaper 1.46** 0.04 4.29 1.43** 0.041 4.16 Crossowned With TV Station 0.79*** 0.00 2.20 0.79*** 0.000 2.21 Commercial Station -1.45*** 0.00 0.24 -1.50*** 0.000 0.22 Local Marketing Agreement -0.42 0.15 0.66 -0.39 0.182 0.67 Sibling News Station in Market 0.39*** 0.01 1.47 0.41*** 0.007 1.51 Owner in Same State 0.24* 0.06 1.27 0.23* 0.078 1.26 Parent Stations in Market 0.04 0.16 1.04
• http://www.fcc.gov/ownership/materials/already-released/consumer090002.pdf
  • See text for explanation. 46 Table 1: Television Outlets, 1994-2000 year N uhf vhf uhf+vhf network indep. public net+ind+pub 1994207 2.29 2.63 2.46 1995207 2.96 2.29 5.25 2.72 2.52 1.71 6.96 1996207 3.09 2.34 5.43 4.20 1.23 1.71 7.14 1997207 3.19 2.35 5.54 4.29 1.25 1.71 7.25 1998207 3.37 2.37 5.74 4.74 1.40 1.72 7.87 1999207 3.54 2.37 5.91 4.94 1.46 2000207 3.65 2.39 6.04 5.02 1.57 1.73 8.32 linked sample year N uhf vhf uhf+vhf network indep. public net+ind+pub 1994 2.64 2.88 3.33 1995143 3.76 2.63 6.38 3.01 3.37 2.04 8.42 1996143 3.88 2.68 6.56 4.85 1.71 2.03 8.59 1997143 3.98 2.69 6.67 4.95 1.72 2.03 8.71 1998143 4.19 2.71 6.90 5.26 1.90 2.05 9.21 1999143 4.40 2.71 7.11 5.43
• http://www.fcc.gov/pshs/docs/clearinghouse/case-studies/Hurricane-Ike-Harris%20County-120109.pdf
  • 10 9/13/2008 9 32898 9.14 91.4% 13 6 9/14/2008 20 10461 2.91 48.4% 14 10 9/13/2008 18 26514 7.37 73.7% 15 11 9/13/2008 12 33765 9.38 85.3% 16 7 9/13/2008 19 7539 2.09 29.9% 17 8 9/14/2008 15 11433 3.18 39.7% 18 14 9/15/2008 9 31780 8.83 63.1% 19 14 9/16/2008 11 21023 5.84 41.7% 20 4 9/13/2008 14 5253 1.46 36.5% 21 4 9/13/2008 21 2524 0.70 17.5% 22 11 9/13/2008 8 34942 9.71 88.2% 23 11 9/11/2008 9 27056 7.52 68.3% 24 6 9/13/2008 8 7193 2.00 33.3% 25 The usage in erlang is the air seconds divided by 3600 seconds. 26 Site utilization is the usage in erlang divided by number of channels. 38 Table 6 - Harris
• http://www.fcc.gov/transaction/att-comcast/comcast_exttime050102.pdf
  • text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Before the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20554 In the Matter of ) ) Applications for Consent to the ) MB Docket No. 02-70 Transfer of Control of Licenses ) ) Comcast Corporation and ) AT&T Corp., Transferors, ) ) To ) ) AT&T Comcast Corporation, ) Transferee ) MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME Pursuant to Section 1.46 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.46, Comcast Corporation ("Comcast") and AT&T Corp. ("AT&T") hereby move for a seven-day extension of time for filing their reply comments in the above-captioned proceeding. As explained below, granting the extension would allow the applicants to present in their reply a more thorough analysis of the issues raised by commenters in this proceeding
• http://www.fcc.gov/transaction/att-comcast/jtpet_mot052402.pdf
  • Before the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20554 In the Matter of )) Applications for Consent to the ) Transfer of Control of Licenses )) MB Docket No. 02-70 Comcast Corporation and AT&T Corp., ) Transferors, )) To )) AT&T Comcast Corporation, ) Transferee ) To: Media Bureau MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME OF JOINT CONSUMER PETITIONERS Pursuant to Rule 1.46, the Joint Consumer Petitioners request an extension of one week to reply to the Opposition to Petition to Deny filed by Comcast Corporation and AT&T Corp. (Appli- cants) on May 21, 2002. If the Bureau grants this Motion, Joint Consumer Petitioners will have until June 5, 2002, to file a timely Reply to Applicants� Opposition. On April 29, 2002, in
• http://www.fcc.gov/transaction/att-comcast/oppwp35.pdf
  • regressions that employed Seller #3 Net Surplus and Seller #4 Net Surplus as dependent variables. 46 Observations = 24 F(3, 20) = 3.26 Prob > F = 0.04 R2 = .3338 Root MSE = 36.96 Seller #1 Net Surplus Coefficient (t-value) (95% Confidence. Interval) Low/High -48.75 (-2.22) -94.51 -2.98 High/High -59.50 (-2.93) -101.90-17.07 Period -5.46 (-.81) -19.55 8.62 Constant -70.71 (-1.46) -171.80 30.46 Table 18: Seller #1 Net Surplus Regression (CAP MFN Treatment) Observations = 24 F(3, 20) = 1.90 Prob > F = 0.1622 R2 = .3054 Root MSE = 19.382 Seller #2 Net Surplus Coefficient (t-value) (95% Confidence. Interval) Low/High -21.25 (-1.91) -44.41 1.91 High/High -26.25 (-2.36) -49.45 -3.04 Period -2.55 (-.57) -11.95 6.85 Constant -98.71 (-2.79) -172.35-24.74 Table
• http://www.fcc.gov/transaction/comsat-telenor/fcc01-369.pdf
  • to Motion for Waiver to Accept Pleading, September 9, 2001). 39 47 C.F.R. � 1.3. 40 See Northeast Cellular Tel. Co. v. FCC, 897 F.2d 1164, 1166 (D.C. Cir. 1990), citing WAIT Radio v. FCC, 418 F.2d 1153, 1159 (D.C. Cir. 1970) (indicating need for articulation of special circumstances beyond those considered during regular rulemaking). 41 See 47 C.F.R. � 1.46. 42 47 U.S.C. �� 214(a) and 310(d). 43 47 U.S.C. � 310. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION FCC 01-369 7 ensure that, on balance, the proposed transaction will serve the public interest, convenience, and necessity.44 Our analysis considers the likely competitive effects of the proposed transfer or assignment and whether such transfer or assignment raises significant anti-competitive issues.45 In addition, we consider
• http://www.fcc.gov/transaction/voicestream-deutsche/DT-VoiceStream_Order.doc
  • Commission released a Public Notice seeking comment in this proceeding and setting November 13, 2000 as the deadline for initial petitions/comments and November 27, 2000 as the deadline for oppositions/responses. Senator Hollings moves for a 30-day extension of the deadline to file comments in this proceeding. As discussed below, we grant Senator Hollings's Motion. II. Discussion 2. Pursuant to Section 1.46(b) of the Commission's rules, Senator Hollings requests that we grant a 30-day extension of the filing deadlines in this proceeding. Senator Hollings states that he has a keen interest in the outcome of this proceeding and plans to file comments. He further states that due to the pendency of critical legislative matters, however, he and his staff have not had
• http://www.fcc.gov/wcb/armis/documents/1998PDFs/4307C98.PDF
  • Page11of20 RECORDTYPEZ1-LECCALLSET-UPTIMEDATARECORD Field Item Example Position Description 1 RecordNumber 1103 1-4 Thesequentialnumberofthisrecord withinthisdatafileplus1000. Format:Rightjustifiedandspacefilled. 2 COSA "LBIL" 6-11 TheCOSAcodeforthefilingentity. Format:Includequotationmarks. 3 RecordType "Z1" 13-16 AlwayscontainstheletterZcapitalized andthenumber1withnospacebetween them. Format:Includequotationmarks. 4 RowNumber 0510.0 18-23 RownumbersasidentifiedontheReport Definition. Validrange:0510.0to0523.0. Format:Rightjustifiedandspacefilled, withonedecimalplace. Sinceallapplicablerownumbers areintegers,append.0toeach rownumber. 5 Column(e)data 97 25-33 Thisfieldcontainsthedatacorresponding tocolumn(e)asshownontheForm SectionoftheReportDefinition. Format:Rightjustifiedandspacefilled. Enter-88888inintegerrowsand -88888.00inpercentagerows onthe"publicversion"diskette toindicatethatconfidential treatmenthasbeenrequested. Enter-77777inintegerrowsand -77777.00inpercentagerows wheredataforafieldare Irretrievable. Allotherfieldsmustbepopulated. 6 Column(f)data 1.46 35-43 Column(f)data Format:SeeField5above. 7 Column(g)data 2.02 45-53 Column(g)data Format:SeeField5above. 8 Column(h)data 3.07 55-63 Column(h)data Format:SeeField5above. 9 Column(i)data 2.16 65-73 Column(i)data Format:SeeField5above. 10 Column(j)data 1.34 75-83 Column(j)data Format:SeeField5above. FCCReport43-07-AutomatedReportSpecifications December1998 Page12of20 RECORDTYPEZ1-LECCALLSET-UPTIMEDATARECORD(continued) 11 EndofRecordCode "XQ" 85-88 AlwayscontainsthelettersXQcapitalized withnospacebetweenthemtoindicate theendoftherecord. Format:Includequotationmarks. Note: Allfieldsareseparatedbycommas. Ifanydataforthecurrentperioddiffermateriallyfromthatforthepreviousperiodandthe differenceisnotself-explanatorybutwascausedbyunusualcircumstancesnotexplainedina previousreport,thenincludefootnotetexttoexplainthespecificcircumstances. Certainitemsrequireaccompanyingfootnotesandthoseitemsarespecifiedintheappropriate sectionsoftheinstructionsforfilingthe43-07.Suchitemsaremandatoryandmustbeenteredin theFootnoteTextRecordsandFootnoteTable. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 1234567890123456789012345678901234567890123456789012345678901234567890123456789012345678 Samplerecord: 1103,"LBIL","Z1",0510.0, 97, 1.46
• http://www.fcc.gov/wcb/armis/documents/1998PDFs/4307S98.PDF
  • Page11of20 RECORDTYPEZ1-LECCALLSET-UPTIMEDATARECORD Field Item Example Position Description 1 RecordNumber 1103 1-4 Thesequentialnumberofthisrecord withinthisdatafileplus1000. Format:Rightjustifiedandspacefilled. 2 COSA "LBIL" 6-11 TheCOSAcodeforthefilingentity. Format:Includequotationmarks. 3 RecordType "Z1" 13-16 AlwayscontainstheletterZcapitalized andthenumber1withnospacebetween them. Format:Includequotationmarks. 4 RowNumber 0510.0 18-23 RownumbersasidentifiedontheReport Definition. Validrange:0510.0to0523.0. Format:Rightjustifiedandspacefilled, withonedecimalplace. Sinceallapplicablerownumbers areintegers,append.0toeach rownumber. 5 Column(e)data 97 25-33 Thisfieldcontainsthedatacorresponding tocolumn(e)asshownontheForm SectionoftheReportDefinition. Format:Rightjustifiedandspacefilled. Enter-88888inintegerrowsand -88888.00inpercentagerows onthe"publicversion"diskette toindicatethatconfidential treatmenthasbeenrequested. Enter-77777inintegerrowsand -77777.00inpercentagerows wheredataforafieldare Irretrievable. Allotherfieldsmustbepopulated. 6 Column(f)data 1.46 35-43 Column(f)data Format:SeeField5above. 7 Column(g)data 2.02 45-53 Column(g)data Format:SeeField5above. 8 Column(h)data 3.07 55-63 Column(h)data Format:SeeField5above. 9 Column(i)data 2.16 65-73 Column(i)data Format:SeeField5above. 10 Column(j)data 1.34 75-83 Column(j)data Format:SeeField5above. FCCReport43-07-AutomatedReportSpecifications December1998 Page12of20 RECORDTYPEZ1-LECCALLSET-UPTIMEDATARECORD(continued) 11 EndofRecordCode "XQ" 85-88 AlwayscontainsthelettersXQcapitalized withnospacebetweenthemtoindicate theendoftherecord. Format:Includequotationmarks. Note: Allfieldsareseparatedbycommas. Ifanydataforthecurrentperioddiffermateriallyfromthatforthepreviousperiodandthe differenceisnotself-explanatorybutwascausedbyunusualcircumstancesnotexplainedina previousreport,thenincludefootnotetexttoexplainthespecificcircumstances. Certainitemsrequireaccompanyingfootnotesandthoseitemsarespecifiedintheappropriate sectionsoftheinstructionsforfilingthe43-07.Suchitemsaremandatoryandmustbeenteredin theFootnoteTextRecordsandFootnoteTable. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 1234567890123456789012345678901234567890123456789012345678901234567890123456789012345678 Samplerecord: 1103,"LBIL","Z1",0510.0, 97, 1.46
• http://www.fcc.gov/wcb/armis/documents/1999PDFs/4307C99.PDF
  • Section of the Report Definition. Format:Right justified and space filled. Enter �88888 in integer rows and �88888.00 in percentage rows on the "public version" diskette to indicate that confidential treatment has been requested. Enter �77777 in integer rows and -77777.00 in percentage rows where data for a field are Irretrievable. All other fields must be populated. 6 Column (f) data 1.46 35 � 43 Column (f) data Format:See Field 5 above. 7 Column (g) data 2.02 45 � 53 Column (g) data Format:See Field 5 above. 8 Column (h) data 3.07 55 � 63 Column (h) data Format:See Field 5 above. 9 Column (i) data 2.16 65 � 73 Column (i) data Format:See Field 5 above. 10 Column (j) data 1.34
• http://www.fcc.gov/wcb/armis/documents/1999PDFs/4307S99.PDF
  • Section of the Report Definition. Format:Right justified and space filled. Enter �88888 in integer rows and �88888.00 in percentage rows on the "public version" diskette to indicate that confidential treatment has been requested. Enter �77777 in integer rows and -77777.00 in percentage rows where data for a field are Irretrievable. All other fields must be populated. 6 Column (f) data 1.46 35 � 43 Column (f) data Format:See Field 5 above. 7 Column (g) data 2.02 45 � 53 Column (g) data Format:See Field 5 above. 8 Column (h) data 3.07 55 � 63 Column (h) data Format:See Field 5 above. 9 Column (i) data 2.16 65 � 73 Column (i) data Format:See Field 5 above. 10 Column (j) data 1.34
• http://www.fcc.gov/wcb/armis/documents/2000PDFs/4307C00.PDF
  • number. 5 Column (e) data 97 25 � 33 This field contains the data corresponding to column (e) as shown on the Form Section of the Report Definition. Format:Right justified and space filled. Enter �77777 in integer rows and -77777.00 in percentage rows where data for a field are Irretrievable. All other fields must be populated. 6 Column (f) data 1.46 35 � 43 Column (f) data Format:See Field 5 above. 7 Column (g) data 2.02 45 � 53 Column (g) data Format:See Field 5 above. 8 Column (h) data 3.07 55 � 63 Column (h) data Format:See Field 5 above. 9 Column (i) data 2.16 65 � 73 Column (i) data Format:See Field 5 above. 10 Column (j) data 1.34
• http://www.fcc.gov/wcb/armis/documents/2000PDFs/4307S00.PDF
  • number. 5 Column (e) data 97 25 � 33 This field contains the data corresponding to column (e) as shown on the Form Section of the Report Definition. Format:Right justified and space filled. Enter �77777 in integer rows and -77777.00 in percentage rows where data for a field are Irretrievable. All other fields must be populated. 6 Column (f) data 1.46 35 � 43 Column (f) data Format:See Field 5 above. 7 Column (g) data 2.02 45 � 53 Column (g) data Format:See Field 5 above. 8 Column (h) data 3.07 55 � 63 Column (h) data Format:See Field 5 above. 9 Column (i) data 2.16 65 � 73 Column (i) data Format:See Field 5 above. 10 Column (j) data 1.34
• http://www.fcc.gov/wcb/armis/documents/2001PDFs/4307C01.PDF
  • number. 5 Column (e) data 97 25 � 33 This field contains the data corresponding to column (e) as shown on the Form Section of the Report Definition. Format:Right justified and space filled. Enter �77777 in integer rows and -77777.00 in percentage rows where data for a field are Irretrievable. All other fields must be populated. 6 Column (f) data 1.46 35 � 43 Column (f) data Format:See Field 5 above. 7 Column (g) data 2.02 45 � 53 Column (g) data Format:See Field 5 above. 8 Column (h) data 3.07 55 � 63 Column (h) data Format:See Field 5 above. 9 Column (i) data 2.16 65 � 73 Column (i) data Format:See Field 5 above. 10 Column (j) data 1.34
• http://www.fcc.gov/wcb/armis/documents/2001PDFs/4307S01.PDF
  • number. 5 Column (e) data 97 25 � 33 This field contains the data corresponding to column (e) as shown on the Form Section of the Report Definition. Format:Right justified and space filled. Enter �77777 in integer rows and -77777.00 in percentage rows where data for a field are Irretrievable. All other fields must be populated. 6 Column (f) data 1.46 35 � 43 Column (f) data Format:See Field 5 above. 7 Column (g) data 2.02 45 � 53 Column (g) data Format:See Field 5 above. 8 Column (h) data 3.07 55 � 63 Column (h) data Format:See Field 5 above. 9 Column (i) data 2.16 65 � 73 Column (i) data Format:See Field 5 above. 10 Column (j) data 1.34