FCC Web Documents citing 1.45

as compiled by hallikainen.com/FccRules on 2012 07 01

• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2079A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2079A1.pdf
  • [ * * * REDACTED * * * ] information Network seeks to provide in its Reply is not germane to the bases of our determination here, see n.16, infra, and Network has made no showing of extraordinary circumstances to justify the filing of a reply not contemplated by the rules, we deny that motion. See generally 47 C.F.R. � 1.45(d). We therefore need not address APCC's filings regarding Network's request: APCC Services, Inc. v. NetworkIP, LLC and Network Enhanced Services, LLP, Opposition to Defendant's Motion for Leave to File a Reply, File No. EB-03-MD-011 (filed May 16, 2007); APCC Services, Inc. v. NetworkIP, LLC and Network Enhanced Services, LLP, Conditional Motion for Leave to File Opposition to Defendant's Reply (filed
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-576A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-576A1.pdf
  • In taking these actions, we make no finding regarding the degree to which Sprint's inability to vacate channels by prior deadlines is due to factors within or beyond Sprint's control, and defer consideration of such issues to a later date. Finally, we deny Smartcomm's motion to late-file its opposition to the Sprint waiver request and we dismiss its opposition. Section 1.45 of the Commission's rules provides that oppositions to any motion, petition, or request be filed within 10 days of the filing date of the underlying pleading. Sprint filed its waiver request on January 27, 2010, causing oppositions to be due no later than February 8, 2010. Smartcomm's filing was thus untimely by 46 days. In its request for acceptance of
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-585A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-585A1.pdf
  • including some in the regions in which Sprint seeks relief, and that it stands ready to relinquish more spectrum as public safety agencies retune to their new channel assignments. On March 8, 2011, Smartcomm and PSI each filed a reply to the Sprint Reply. Because Smartcomm's and PSI's replies fall outside of the scope of permissible pleadings contemplated by Section 1.45 of the Commission's rules, we have not considered them and are dismissing them as unauthorized pleadings. DISCUSSION In the 2008 Vacated Spectrum Order, the Commission established a process under which Sprint was to clear the Mid-Band in stages. This process was intended to balance the need to reduce the potential for interference and increase the amount of 800 MHz spectrum
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-275668A1.pdf
  • Site 2: Inter-Unit Townhouse Wall Transmit Antenna: --Location Outdoors Garage Townhouse A, ground floor --Mount Wood/fiberglass mast Wood/fiberglass mast Wood tripod --Floor Asphalt driveway Concrete slab Carpeted concrete slab --Height (center of antenna) 0.97 m and 1.47 m 0.97 m and 1.47 m for2-m distance 0.97 m and 2.39m for10- m distance 0.88m and 1.26m at 2-m distance 0.88m and 1.45m at 10- m distance TV: --Location Outdoors Outdoors Townhouse B, ground floor --Mount 0.85-m tall plastic cart 0.85-m tall plastic cart 0.85-m tall plastic cart --Floor Asphalt driveway Asphalt driveway extensionat 2-m distance Grass at 10-m distance Carpeted concrete slab --Aspect Angle Front, rear, rightside, right- rear (~45 deg.) Front and rear Rear # of TVs Tested One Three Three
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-1070A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-1070A1.txt
  • its finder's request." CLC argued that the decision by the former Office of Operations should be overturned and CLC should be allowed to amend its finder's request to include the discontinuance of service argument.12 On October 19 1999, the Division denied CLC's petition for reconsideration. The Division concluded that the April 18, 1995, reply was untimely filed pursuant to Section 1.45 of the Commission's Rules, which requires parties to file a reply within five days after the deadline for filing oppositions has expired.13 The Division also stated that it would be unduly burdensome to allow a finder to amend its finder's request based on information provided in the target's opposition statement.14 On November 18, 1999, CLC filed a further petition for
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-1091A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-1091A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-1091A1.txt
  • technology are adopted in an international standards-setting process will affect either the speed with which a TTY solution can be developed and implemented, or the type of solution that is adopted. III. Procedural Matters We remind parties that the Commission has granted waivers to carriers pending a decision on the implementation date. Those waivers remain in effect. Pursuant to Section 1.45 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.45, interested parties may file comments on the proposed implementation deadline no later than June 19, 2000. Replies shall be filed no later than July 19, 2000. All comments shall reference the docket number of this proceeding. Comments may be filed using the Commission's Electronic Comment Filing System (ECFS) or by filing paper
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-1104A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-1104A1.txt
  • Telecommunications Division, International Bureau, (202) 418-1460; TTY: 418-2555. Interested parties may file comments with respect to this notification within 14 days of the date of this public notice (see Section 1.4(b)(4)). The notifying carrier may respond within 10 days after any such pleadings are filed, and the parties that filed such pleadings may reply within 5 days. See Section 63.52(c), 1.45(c)-(j). It is requested that such comments refer to the notification file number shown above. A copy of the notification is available for public inspection in the Reference Information Center, Court Yard Level, 445 12th Street, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20554. Page 1 of 1
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-1158A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-1158A1.txt
  • Telecommunications Division, International Bureau, (202) 418-1460; TTY: 418-2555. Interested parties may file comments with respect to this notification within 14 days of the date of this public notice (see Section 1.4(b)(4)). The notifying carrier may respond within 10 days after any such pleadings are filed, and the parties that filed such pleadings may reply within 5 days. See Section 63.52(c), 1.45(c)-(j). It is requested that such comments refer to the notification file number shown above. A copy of the notification is available for public inspection in the Reference Information Center, Court Yard Level, 445 12th Street, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20554. Page 2 of 2
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-1232A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-1232A1.txt
  • Telecommunications Division, International Bureau, (202) 418-1460; TTY: 418-2555. Interested parties may file comments with respect to this notification within 14 days of the date of this public notice (see Section 1.4(b)(4)). The notifying carrier may respond within 10 days after any such pleadings are filed, and the parties that filed such pleadings may reply within 5 days. See Section 63.52(c), 1.45(c)-(j). It is requested that such comments refer to the notification file number shown above. A copy of the notification is available for public inspection in the Reference Information Center, Court Yard Level, 445 12th Street, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20554. Page 1 of 1
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-1390A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-1390A1.txt
  • Telecommunications Division, International Bureau, (202) 418-1460; TTY: 418-2555. Interested parties may file comments with respect to this notification within 14 days of the date of this public notice (see Section 1.4(b)(4)). The notifying carrier may respond within 10 days after any such pleadings are filed, and the parties that filed such pleadings may reply within 5 days. See Section 63.52(c), 1.45(c)-(j). It is requested that such comments refer to the notification file number shown above. A copy of the notification is available for public inspection in the Reference Information Center, Court Yard Level, 445 12th Street, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20554. 10892
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-1457A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-1457A1.txt
  • Telecommunications Division, International Bureau, (202) 418-1460; TTY: 418-2555. Interested parties may file comments with respect to this notification within 14 days of the date of this public notice (see Section 1.4(b)(4)). The notifying carrier may respond within 10 days after any such pleadings are filed, and the parties that filed such pleadings may reply within 5 days. See Section 63.52(c), 1.45(c)-(j). It is requested that such comments refer to the notification file number shown above. A copy of the notification is available for public inspection in the Reference Information Center, Court Yard Level, 445 12th Street, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20554. Page 1 of 1
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-1629A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-1629A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-1629A1.txt
  • Section 0.321 of the Commission's rules. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION William H. Johnson Deputy Chief, Cable Services Bureau Brunson Communications, Inc. v. RCN Telecom Services, Inc., DA 00-1123 (released May 23, 2000)(``Bureau Order''). We note that RCN has filed a motion to strike WGTW's opposition, arguing that WGTW filed its opposition well after the 7 day filed period required by Section 1.45(d) of the Commission's rules. WGTW acknowledged that its pleading was late-filed in an associated Motion for Extension of Time to accept its opposition. WGTW states that due to its lead counsel's unavailability to prepare the opposition, additional time was necessary to finalize the opposition. In the interest of obtaining a complete record, we will accept WGTW's late-filed opposition. Virginia Petroleum
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-1809A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-1809A1.txt
  • Telecommunications Division, International Bureau, (202) 418-1460; TTY: 418-2555. Interested parties may file comments with respect to this notification within 14 days of the date of this public notice (see Section 1.4(b)(4)). The notifying carrier may respond within 10 days after any such pleadings are filed, and the parties that filed such pleadings may reply within 5 days. See Section 63.52(c), 1.45(c)-(j). It is requested that such comments refer to the notification file number shown above. A copy of the notification is available for public inspection in the Reference Information Center, Court Yard Level, 445 12th Street, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20554. Page 1 of 1
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-1945A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-1945A1.txt
  • Telecommunications Division, International Bureau, (202) 418-1460; TTY: 418-2555. Interested parties may file comments with respect to this notification within 14 days of the date of this public notice (see Section 1.4(b)(4)). The notifying carrier may respond within 10 days after any such pleadings are filed, and the parties that filed such pleadings may reply within 5 days. See Section 63.52(c), 1.45(c)-(j). It is requested that such comments refer to the notification file number shown above. A copy of the notification is available for public inspection in the Reference Information Center, Court Yard Level, 445 12th Street, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20554. Page 1 of 1
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2169A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2169A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2169A1.txt
  • 0000138813 filed by Broadband WirelessAccess Services, Cambridge Partners, Inc., HiCap Networks, Inc., PIW Development Corporation, Paul R. Likins, Southfield Communications LLC, SMC Associates, Video Communications Corporation, and Wireless Telco on July 31, 2000, IS DISMISSED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED pursuant to Sections 4(i) and 303(r) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 154(i), 303(r), and Sections 1.45(a) and 1.2108 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.45(a), 1.2108, the Consolidated Motion to Accept Late-Filed Pleading and Opposition filed by PTPMS Communications, LLC, on August 18, 2000, IS DENIED. This action is taken under delegated authority pursuant to Sections 0.131 and 0.331 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.131, 0.331. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION D'wana R. Terry Chief,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2220A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2220A1.txt
  • Telecommunications Division, International Bureau, (202) 418-1460; TTY: 418-2555. Interested parties may file comments with respect to this notification within 14 days of the date of this public notice (see Section 1.4(b)(4)). The notifying carrier may respond within 10 days after any such pleadings are filed, and the parties that filed such pleadings may reply within 5 days. See Section 63.52(c), 1.45(c)-(j). It is requested that such comments refer to the notification file number shown above. A copy of the notification is available for public inspection in the Reference Information Center, Court Yard Level, 445 12th Street, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20554. Page 2 of 2
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2365A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2365A1.txt
  • Telecommunications Division, International Bureau, (202) 418-1460; TTY: 418-2555. Interested parties may file comments with respect to this notification within 14 days of the date of this public notice (see Section 1.4(b)(4)). The notifying carrier may respond within 10 days after any such pleadings are filed, and the parties that filed such pleadings may reply within 5 days. See Section 63.52(c), 1.45(c)-(j). It is requested that such comments refer to the notification file number shown above. A copy of the notification is available for public inspection in the Reference Information Center, Court Yard Level, 445 12th Street, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20554. Page 1 of 1
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2410A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2410A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2410A1.txt
  • two petitions on behalf of IVDS Enterprises Joint Venture, Instapage Network LTD, Tel/Logic, Inc., In-Sync Interactive Corporation, Loli, Inc., KMC Interactive TV, Inc., Trans Pacific Interactive, Inc. and Whitehall Wireless Corporation. These pleadings are listed in the Appendix to this ruling. Additionally, although one comment was late filed, we accepted it as an ex parte filing. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.45(b). 47 C.F.R. � 95.803(a). See Amendment of Parts 0, 1, 2 and 95 of the Commission's Rules to Provide for Interactive Video Data Services, GEN Docket No. 91-2, Notice of Proposed Rule Making, 6 FCC Rcd. 1368 (1991) (``Allocation Notice''); see also, Implementation of Section 309(j) of the Communications Act--Competitive Bidding, PP Docket No. 93-253, Second Memorandum Opinion and Order,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2412A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2412A1.txt
  • Telecommunications Division, International Bureau, (202) 418-1460; TTY: 418-2555. Interested parties may file comments with respect to this notification within 14 days of the date of this public notice (see Section 1.4(b)(4)). The notifying carrier may respond within 10 days after any such pleadings are filed, and the parties that filed such pleadings may reply within 5 days. See Section 63.52(c), 1.45(c)-(j). It is requested that such comments refer to the notification file number shown above. A copy of the notification is available for public inspection in the Reference Information Center, Court Yard Level, 445 12th Street, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20554. Page 1 of 1
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2474A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2474A1.txt
  • Telecommunications Division, International Bureau, (202) 418-1460; TTY: 418-2555. Interested parties may file comments with respect to this notification within 14 days of the date of this public notice (see Section 1.4(b)(4)). The notifying carrier may respond within 10 days after any such pleadings are filed, and the parties that filed such pleadings may reply within 5 days. See Section 63.52(c), 1.45(c)-(j). It is requested that such comments refer to the notification file number shown above. A copy of the notification is available for public inspection in the Reference Information Center, Court Yard Level, 445 12th Street, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20554. Page 1 of 1
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2588A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2588A1.txt
  • Telecommunications Division, International Bureau, (202) 418-1460; TTY: 418-2555. Interested parties may file comments with respect to this notification within 14 days of the date of this public notice (see Section 1.4(b)(4)). The notifying carrier may respond within 10 days after any such pleadings are filed, and the parties that filed such pleadings may reply within 5 days. See Section 63.52(c), 1.45(c)-(j). It is requested that such comments refer to the notification file number shown above. A copy of the notification is available for public inspection in the Reference Information Center, Court Yard Level, 445 12th Street, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20554. Page 1 of 1
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2794A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2794A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2794A1.txt
  • will apply the application processing and provisioning intervals that the Collocation Waiver Order approved for Verizon and SBC to collocation requests arising in the three states in the BellSouth region in which the state commission has not prescribed collocation intervals. Interested parties may file comments regarding BellSouth petition for conditional waiver no later than December 28, 2000. We waive section 1.45 of the Commission's rules insofar as it permits reply comments. All filings regarding the petitions for conditional waiver should reference the Common Carrier Bureau docket assigned to this proceeding, CC Docket No. 98-147. , and should include the following words in the body of the message, ``get form .'' A sample form and directions will be sent in
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-333A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-333A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-333A1.txt
  • 5, 1998 by Colorado 7 - Saguache Limited Partnership and the Petition for Reconsideration or, Alternatively, Comments in Suppport of Petition for Reconsideration and Request for Referral to the Commissioners for Treatment as an Application for Review, filed October 5, 1998 by Colorado 7 - Saguache Limited Partnership, are unauthorized pleadings which will not be considered. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.45. Emergency Request at 1. See September 4 Order at n. 4. Emergency Request at 2. Application at Exhibit III. See 47 C.F.R. �� 22.911(d)(2)(i) and 22.912(b), (c). Federal Communications Commission DA 00-333 Federal Communications Commission DA 00-333 � � � � � � �
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-474A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-474A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-474A1.txt
  • to Opposition. Because the two NALFs were issued after the pleading cycle for the Petition for Reconsideration had expired and could not have been brought to our attention sooner, we grant High Plains' Motion to Accept Filing, and we consider both High Plains' Supplement to Opposition and Mercury's Supplement to Reply to Opposition in this proceeding. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.45(c) (additional pleadings may be filed only if specifically requested or authorized by the Commission). Mercury PCS II, LLC, FCC 98-203 (Aug. 28, 1998) (NALF Reconsideration Order). Id., � 9. Id., � 10. High Plains Grant Order, 12 FCC Rcd. at 19,629-30 � 7. In its Petition for Reconsideration, Mercury has alleged for the first time that High Plains' Petition to
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-726A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-726A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-726A1.txt
  • system malfunctions in using handsets with upgraded software compliant with the rule. Motorola states that it needs the limited authority to manufacture 30,000 additional specialized analog handsets for its Telematics product without the 911 call completion software modifications because inventory handsets manufactured prior to February 13, 2000 are expected to be exhausted by the middle of April. Pursuant to Sections 1.45 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. Section 1.45, interested parties may file comments on the Motorola request no later than Monday, April 10, 2000. Replies shall be filed no later than Monday, April 17, 2000. All comments shall reference the docket number of this proceeding. Comments may be filed using the Commission's Electronic Comment Filing System (ECFS) or by filing
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-882A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-882A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-882A1.txt
  • that it seeks a waiver so that it may continue to meet its minimum contractual obligations to United States wireless service providers. The relief sought is said to be only for the time necessary for Samsung to modify and test handsets to comply with the rule, which in no event will be later than July 15, 2000. Pursuant to Sections 1.45 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. Section 1.45, interested parties may file comments on the Samsung request no later than Friday, April 28, 2000. Replies shall be filed no later than Friday, May 5, 2000. All comments shall reference the docket number of this proceeding. Comments may be filed using the Commission's Electronic Comment Filing System (ECFS) or by filing
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1178A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1178A1.txt
  • Bureau, (202) 418-1460; TTY: 418-2555. Unless otherwised specified, interested parties may file comments with respect to this notification within 14 days of the date of this public notice (see Section 1.4(b)(4)). The notifying carrier may respond within 10 days after any such pleadings are filed, and the parties that filed such pleadings may reply within 5 days. See Section 63.52(c), 1.45(c)-(j). It is requested that such comments refer to the notification file number shown above. A copy of the notification is available for public inspection in the Reference Information Center, Court Yard Level, 445 12th Street, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20554. Page 1 of 1
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1281A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1281A1.txt
  • Bureau, (202) 418-1460; TTY: 418-2555. Unless otherwised specified, interested parties may file comments with respect to this notification within 14 days of the date of this public notice (see Section 1.4(b)(4)). The notifying carrier may respond within 10 days after any such pleadings are filed, and the parties that filed such pleadings may reply within 5 days. See Section 63.52(c), 1.45(c)-(j). It is requested that such comments refer to the notification file number shown above. A copy of the notification is available for public inspection in the Reference Information Center, Court Yard Level, 445 12th Street, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20554. Page 2 of 2
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1367A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1367A1.txt
  • Bureau, (202) 418-1460; TTY: 418-2555. Unless otherwised specified, interested parties may file comments with respect to this notification within 14 days of the date of this public notice (see Section 1.4(b)(4)). The notifying carrier may respond within 10 days after any such pleadings are filed, and the parties that filed such pleadings may reply within 5 days. See Section 63.52(c), 1.45(c)-(j). It is requested that such comments refer to the notification file number shown above. A copy of the notification is available for public inspection in the Reference Information Center, Court Yard Level, 445 12th Street, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20554. Page 1 of 1
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1430A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1430A1.txt
  • Bureau, (202) 418-1460; TTY: 418-2555. Unless otherwised specified, interested parties may file comments with respect to this notification within 14 days of the date of this public notice (see Section 1.4(b)(4)). The notifying carrier may respond within 10 days after any such pleadings are filed, and the parties that filed such pleadings may reply within 5 days. See Section 63.52(c), 1.45(c)-(j). It is requested that such comments refer to the notification file number shown above. A copy of the notification is available for public inspection in the Reference Information Center, Court Yard Level, 445 12th Street, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20554. Page 1 of 1
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1497A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1497A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1497A1.txt
  • System (ULS) and must be filed manually. Specifically, the Commission's Rules state that the following items may be filed electronically: (a) informal requests for Commission action in application and licensing matters pertaining to Wireless Radio Services, see 47 C.F.R. � 1.41; (b) pleadings associated with licenses, applications, waivers and other documents in the Wireless Radio Services, see 47 C.F.R. � 1.45; (c) petitions, pleadings, and other documents associated with licensing matters in the Wireless Radio Services, see 47 C.F.R. � 1.49(e); (d) pleadings, briefs or other documents for application and licensing matters involving the Wireless Radio Services, see 47 C.F.R. � 1.51(f); (e) petitions for reconsideration of licensing actions, as well as oppositions and replies thereto, that are filed with respect
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1532A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1532A1.txt
  • Bureau, (202) 418-1460; TTY: 418-2555. Unless otherwised specified, interested parties may file comments with respect to this notification within 14 days of the date of this public notice (see Section 1.4(b)(4)). The notifying carrier may respond within 10 days after any such pleadings are filed, and the parties that filed such pleadings may reply within 5 days. See Section 63.52(c), 1.45(c)-(j). It is requested that such comments refer to the notification file number shown above. A copy of the notification is available for public inspection in the Reference Information Center, Court Yard Level, 445 12th Street, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20554. Page 1 of 1
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1609A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1609A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1609A1.txt
  • parties in a section 271 proceeding choose to submit new evidence, however, the Commission retains the discretion to waive its procedural rules and consider the evidence, ``to start the 90-day review process anew, or to accord such evidence no weight.'' Interested parties may file comments regarding the attached ex parte filing no later than July 13, 2001. We waive section 1.45 of the Commission's rules insofar as it permits reply comments. All filings regarding the attached ex parte filing should reference the Common Carrier Bureau docket number assigned to this proceeding, CC Docket No. 01-100. , and should include the following words in the body of the message, ``get form .'' A sample form and directions will be sent
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1619A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1619A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1619A1.txt
  • for Reconsideration (Hoxeng Reply) (filed on October 7, 1999). David E. Hoxeng, Emergency Motion for Stay (filed October 4, 1999). AT&T Corporation, Opposition to Emergency Motion for Stay (filed October 7, 1999). Also on October 8, 1999, Hoxeng filed an unauthorized pleading styled as a ``Reply to [AT&T's] Opposition to Emergency Motion for Stay'' (Reply to AT&T Stay Opposition). Section 1.45(d) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.45(d), provides that replies to oppositions to petitions for stay are not permitted. However, because it includes arguments that bear upon the issues in this reconsideration, we shall consider it. AT&T Corp., 14 FCC Rcd 17,266 (1999). MarSal did not specifically challenge the Bureau's decision not to hold an oral hearing, but did
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-161A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-161A1.txt
  • Bureau, (202) 418-1460; TTY: 418-2555. Unless otherwised specified, interested parties may file comments with respect to this notification within 14 days of the date of this public notice (see Section 1.4(b)(4)). The notifying carrier may respond within 10 days after any such pleadings are filed, and the parties that filed such pleadings may reply within 5 days. See Section 63.52(c), 1.45(c)-(j). It is requested that such comments refer to the notification file number shown above. A copy of the notification is available for public inspection in the Reference Information Center, Court Yard Level, 445 12th Street, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20554. Page 1 of 1
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1748A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1748A1.txt
  • Bureau, (202) 418-1460; TTY: 418-2555. Unless otherwised specified, interested parties may file comments with respect to this notification within 14 days of the date of this public notice (see Section 1.4(b)(4)). The notifying carrier may respond within 10 days after any such pleadings are filed, and the parties that filed such pleadings may reply within 5 days. See Section 63.52(c), 1.45(c)-(j). It is requested that such comments refer to the notification file number shown above. A copy of the notification is available for public inspection in the Reference Information Center, Court Yard Level, 445 12th Street, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20554. Page 1 of 1
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1893A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1893A1.txt
  • Bureau, (202) 418-1460; TTY: 418-2555. Unless otherwised specified, interested parties may file comments with respect to this notification within 14 days of the date of this public notice (see Section 1.4(b)(4)). The notifying carrier may respond within 10 days after any such pleadings are filed, and the parties that filed such pleadings may reply within 5 days. See Section 63.52(c), 1.45(c)-(j). It is requested that such comments refer to the notification file number shown above. A copy of the notification is available for public inspection in the Reference Information Center, Court Yard Level, 445 12th Street, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20554. Page 2 of 2
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1960A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1960A1.txt
  • Bureau, (202) 418-1460; TTY: 418-2555. Unless otherwised specified, interested parties may file comments with respect to this notification within 14 days of the date of this public notice (see Section 1.4(b)(4)). The notifying carrier may respond within 10 days after any such pleadings are filed, and the parties that filed such pleadings may reply within 5 days. See Section 63.52(c), 1.45(c)-(j). It is requested that such comments refer to the notification file number shown above. A copy of the notification is available for public inspection in the Reference Information Center, Court Yard Level, 445 12th Street, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20554. Page 1 of 1
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2044A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2044A1.txt
  • Bureau, (202) 418-1460; TTY: 418-2555. Unless otherwised specified, interested parties may file comments with respect to this notification within 14 days of the date of this public notice (see Section 1.4(b)(4)). The notifying carrier may respond within 10 days after any such pleadings are filed, and the parties that filed such pleadings may reply within 5 days. See Section 63.52(c), 1.45(c)-(j). It is requested that such comments refer to the notification file number shown above. A copy of the notification is available for public inspection in the Reference Information Center, Court Yard Level, 445 12th Street, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20554. Page 1 of 1
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2254A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2254A1.txt
  • Bureau, (202) 418-1460; TTY: 418-2555. Unless otherwised specified, interested parties may file comments with respect to this notification within 14 days of the date of this public notice (see Section 1.4(b)(4)). The notifying carrier may respond within 10 days after any such pleadings are filed, and the parties that filed such pleadings may reply within 5 days. See Section 63.52(c), 1.45(c)-(j). It is requested that such comments refer to the notification file number shown above. A copy of the notification is available for public inspection in the Reference Information Center, Court Yard Level, 445 12th Street, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20554. Page 1 of 1
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2433A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2433A1.txt
  • Bureau, (202) 418-1460; TTY: 418-2555. Unless otherwised specified, interested parties may file comments with respect to this notification within 14 days of the date of this public notice (see Section 1.4(b)(4)). The notifying carrier may respond within 10 days after any such pleadings are filed, and the parties that filed such pleadings may reply within 5 days. See Section 63.52(c), 1.45(c)-(j). It is requested that such comments refer to the notification file number shown above. A copy of the notification is available for public inspection in the Reference Information Center, Court Yard Level, 445 12th Street, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20554. Page 1 of 1
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2481A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2481A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2481A1.txt
  • to Transfer Control, File Nos. SAT-T/C-20001215-00163 and 200-SAT-P/LA-95 (``Application''). Pegasus contends that EchoStar was wrong in claiming that the Pegasus Reply introduced impermissible material and contends also that the EchoStar Response included substantive material filed in an untimely manner and without leave. We deny Pegasus' motion and will consider EchoStar's response to DirectCom as late-filed comments. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.45(c). Letter from Chief, Satellite and Radiocommunication Division, to Mr. Pantelis Michalopoulos (May 30, 2001). Letter from Mr. Pantelis Michalopoulos, Counsel for EchoStar VisionStar Corp., to Mr. Thomas Tycz, Chief, Satellite and Radiocommunication Division, International Bureau, FCC (dated June 7, 2001) (June 7 Letter). The Applicant's initial Request for Confidential Treatment covered the June 7 Letter and its attachments. On June
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2558A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2558A1.txt
  • Bureau, (202) 418-1460; TTY: 418-2555. Unless otherwised specified, interested parties may file comments with respect to this notification within 14 days of the date of this public notice (see Section 1.4(b)(4)). The notifying carrier may respond within 10 days after any such pleadings are filed, and the parties that filed such pleadings may reply within 5 days. See Section 63.52(c), 1.45(c)-(j). It is requested that such comments refer to the notification file number shown above. A copy of the notification is available for public inspection in the Reference Information Center, Court Yard Level, 445 12th Street, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20554. Page 2 of 2
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2728A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2728A1.txt
  • Bureau, (202) 418-1460; TTY: 418-2555. Unless otherwised specified, interested parties may file comments with respect to this notification within 14 days of the date of this public notice (see Section 1.4(b)(4)). The notifying carrier may respond within 10 days after any such pleadings are filed, and the parties that filed such pleadings may reply within 5 days. See Section 63.52(c), 1.45(c)-(j). It is requested that such comments refer to the notification file number shown above. A copy of the notification is available for public inspection in the Reference Information Center, Court Yard Level, 445 12th Street, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20554. Page 2 of 2
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2811A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2811A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2811A1.txt
  • for Yukon Kuskokwim Health Corporation and General Communications, Inc., to Federal Communications Commission, filed October 22, 2001 (Joint Motion for Extension of Time). Request for Review of the Decision of the Universal Service Administrator by Unicom, Inc., CC Docket Nos. 96-45 and 97-21, Request for Review, filed October 9, 2001 (Request for Review), at 2. Id. See 47 C.F.R. �� 1.45, 54.720. Federal Communications Commission DA 01-2811 � � � � � � � �
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2826A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2826A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2826A1.txt
  • the Office of the Secretary, Washington D.C. 20554. Again, rather than filing its ``Response to Petition to Dismiss Orders'' (Response to July Petition) with the Secretary's Office, Dave's sent the pleading to the Commission's Gettysburg Office. Accordingly, we dismiss the Response to July Petition as improperly filed. Finally, we dismiss AirPaging's reply to Dave's opposition to the August Petition. Section 1.45 of the Commission's rules permits the original petitioner to file replies to oppositions within five days after the time for filing oppositions has expired. The last day for Dave's to file its opposition to AirPaging's August Petition was August 31, 2001. AirPaging filed its reply on September 13, 2001 (September Reply), well after the five days allowed under Commission rules.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2834A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2834A1.txt
  • Bureau, (202) 418-1460; TTY: 418-2555. Unless otherwised specified, interested parties may file comments with respect to this notification within 14 days of the date of this public notice (see Section 1.4(b)(4)). The notifying carrier may respond within 10 days after any such pleadings are filed, and the parties that filed such pleadings may reply within 5 days. See Section 63.52(c), 1.45(c)-(j). It is requested that such comments refer to the notification file number shown above. A copy of the notification is available for public inspection in the Reference Information Center, Court Yard Level, 445 12th Street, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20554. Page 1 of 1
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2936A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2936A1.txt
  • Bureau, (202) 418-1460; TTY: 418-2555. Unless otherwised specified, interested parties may file comments with respect to this notification within 14 days of the date of this public notice (see Section 1.4(b)(4)). The notifying carrier may respond within 10 days after any such pleadings are filed, and the parties that filed such pleadings may reply within 5 days. See Section 63.52(c), 1.45(c)-(j). It is requested that such comments refer to the notification file number shown above. A copy of the notification is available for public inspection in the Reference Information Center, Court Yard Level, 445 12th Street, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20554. Page 1 of 1
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-494A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-494A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-494A1.txt
  • apply the application processing and provisioning intervals that the Collocation Waiver Order approved for Verizon and SBC to collocation requests arising in the three states in the CBT region in which the state commission has not prescribed collocation intervals. Interested parties may file comments regarding the CBT petition for conditional waiver no later than March 9, 2001. We waive section 1.45 of the Commission's rules insofar as it permits reply comments. All filings regarding the CBT petition for conditional waiver should reference the Common Carrier Bureau docket assigned to this proceeding, CC Docket No. 98-147. , and should include the following words in the body of the message, ``get form
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-507A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-507A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-507A1.txt
    • Beehive's petition for reconsideration is premature. We nevertheless will treat Beehive's filing as comments and will address below Beehive's objections to the waiver requests. We note that except for Beehive's petition for reconsideration, which we are treating as comments, all of Beehive's filings were submitted outside the comment cycle established in this proceeding and outside the pleading cycle under section 1.45 of the Commission's rules. See Qwest/Acquiring Companies Public Notice (establishing November 13, 2000, as the deadline for reply comments); 47 C.F.R. � 1.45. In the interest of establishing a complete and comprehensive record on this matter, we believe it is in the public interest to accept these further pleadings and will treat them as ex parte presentations. See 47 C.F.R.
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-734A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-734A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-734A1.txt
    • but before the due date for replies will be treated as early-filed replies; and dispositive motions filed after the due date for replies will be treated as ex parte submissions. Such motions will be counted toward the applicable page limit for the submitting party. Non-dispositive motions (e.g., motions to strike) will be subject to the default pleading cycle in section 1.45 of the Commission's rules, unless the Commission or Bureau determines otherwise in a public notice. Because of the expedited nature of section 271 proceedings, section 1.4(h) of the Commission's rules will not apply to motions filed in section 271 proceedings. Thus, parties will not be allowed an extra three days (beyond the time permitted in section 1.45) to respond to
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-845A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-845A1.txt
    • Bureau, (202) 418-1460; TTY: 418-2555. Unless otherwised specified, interested parties may file comments with respect to this notification within 14 days of the date of this public notice (see Section 1.4(b)(4)). The notifying carrier may respond within 10 days after any such pleadings are filed, and the parties that filed such pleadings may reply within 5 days. See Section 63.52(c), 1.45(c)-(j). It is requested that such comments refer to the notification file number shown above. A copy of the notification is available for public inspection in the Reference Information Center, Court Yard Level, 445 12th Street, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20554. Page 2 of 2
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-914A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-914A1.txt
    • Bureau, (202) 418-1460; TTY: 418-2555. Unless otherwised specified, interested parties may file comments with respect to this notification within 14 days of the date of this public notice (see Section 1.4(b)(4)). The notifying carrier may respond within 10 days after any such pleadings are filed, and the parties that filed such pleadings may reply within 5 days. See Section 63.52(c), 1.45(c)-(j). It is requested that such comments refer to the notification file number shown above. A copy of the notification is available for public inspection in the Reference Information Center, Court Yard Level, 445 12th Street, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20554. Page 2 of 2
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-981A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-981A1.txt
    • Bureau, (202) 418-1460; TTY: 418-2555. Unless otherwised specified, interested parties may file comments with respect to this notification within 14 days of the date of this public notice (see Section 1.4(b)(4)). The notifying carrier may respond within 10 days after any such pleadings are filed, and the parties that filed such pleadings may reply within 5 days. See Section 63.52(c), 1.45(c)-(j). It is requested that such comments refer to the notification file number shown above. A copy of the notification is available for public inspection in the Reference Information Center, Court Yard Level, 445 12th Street, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20554. Page 2 of 2
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1149A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1149A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1149A1.txt
    • was untimely filed because, under Commission rules, oppositions to petitions to deny must be filed within ten days after the petition is filed. Repeater further complains that because it was not served the Section 308(b) Response pursuant to Section 1.939(c) of the Commission's rules, Repeater was denied the right to reply. While Repeater is correct about the deadline under Section 1.45 of the Commission's rules for filing oppositions to petitions to deny, Bay submitted the information in response to the Branch's request for additional information pursuant to Section 308(b) of the Communications Act, as amended. Section 308(b) is a tool in the statute that provides the Commission with the authority to obtain written statements of fact at any time in a
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1241A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1241A1.txt
    • Bureau, (202) 418-1460; TTY: 418-2555. Unless otherwised specified, interested parties may file comments with respect to this notification within 14 days of the date of this public notice (see Section 1.4(b)(4)). The notifying carrier may respond within 10 days after any such pleadings are filed, and the parties that filed such pleadings may reply within 5 days. See Section 63.52(c), 1.45(c)-(j). It is requested that such comments refer to the notification file number shown above. A copy of the notification is available for public inspection in the Reference Information Center, Court Yard Level, 445 12th Street, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20554. Page 2 of 2
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1266A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1266A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1266A1.txt
    • S.W., Room TW-A325, Washington, D.C. 20554. If no protest is filed, the District will have waived its right to protest the modification and will be deemed to have consented to the modification. ORDERING CLAUSES Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that pursuant to Section 4(i) and 309(d) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. � 154(i), 309(d) and Section 1.45 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.45, the Informal Petition Requesting Recission or Modification of License Granted to Davis Electronics, Inc. filed by the Louisville and Jefferson County Metropolitan Sewer District on September 25, 2000 IS DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that pursuant to Sections 4(i) and 309(d) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1371A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1371A1.txt
    • Bureau, (202) 418-1460; TTY: 418-2555. Unless otherwised specified, interested parties may file comments with respect to these notifications within 14 days of the date of this public notice (see Section 1.4(b)(4)). The notifying carrier may respond within 10 days after any such pleadings are filed, and the parties that filed such pleadings may reply within 5 days. See Section 63.52(c), 1.45(c)-(j). It is requested that such comments refer to the notification file number shown above. A copy of the notification is available for public inspection in the Reference Information Center, Court Yard Level, 445 12th Street, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20554. Page 2 of 2
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1390A2.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1390A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1390A2.txt
    • but before the due date for replies will be treated as early-filed replies; and dispositive motions filed after the due date for replies will be treated as ex parte submissions. Such motions will be counted toward the applicable page limit for the submitting party. Non-dispositive motions (e.g., motions to strike) will be subject to the default pleading cycle in section 1.45 of the Commission's rules, unless the Commission or Bureau determines otherwise in a public notice. Because of the expedited nature of section 271 proceedings, section 1.4(h) of the Commission's rules will not apply to motions filed in section 271 proceedings. Thus, parties will not be allowed an extra three days (beyond the time permitted in section 1.45) to respond to
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1575A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1575A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1575A1.txt
    • designated a ``permit but disclose'' proceedings and subject to � 1.1206. Ex parte presentations that are made with respect to the issues involved with regard to either the Petition or the Request for Stay will be allowed but must be disclosed in accordance with the requirements of Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.1206(b). Pursuant to Section 1.45 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.415, 1.419, interested parties may file oppositions to the Request for Stay on or before August 2, 2002. Replies are due August 19, 2002. Pursuant to Section 1.429 of the Commission's rules, interested parties may file comments to the Petition for Reconsideration on or before August 2, 2002. Reply comments are due August
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1591A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1591A1.txt
    • Bureau, (202) 418-1460; TTY: 418-2555. Unless otherwised specified, interested parties may file comments with respect to these notifications within 14 days of the date of this public notice (see Section 1.4(b)(4)). The notifying carrier may respond within 10 days after any such pleadings are filed, and the parties that filed such pleadings may reply within 5 days. See Section 63.52(c), 1.45(c)-(j). It is requested that such comments refer to the notification file number shown above. A copy of the notification is available for public inspection in the Reference Information Center, Court Yard Level, 445 12th Street, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20554. Dynegy Communications Clearinghouse, Inc. Notification Pursuant to Section 63.11 of the Commission's rules, Dynegy Communications Clearinghouse, Inc. hereby notifies the Commission
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1666A2.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1666A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1666A2.txt
    • but before the due date for replies will be treated as early-filed replies; and dispositive motions filed after the due date for replies will be treated as ex parte submissions. Such motions will be counted toward the applicable page limit for the submitting party. Non-dispositive motions (e.g., motions to strike) will be subject to the default pleading cycle in section 1.45 of the Commission's rules, unless the Commission or Bureau determines otherwise in a public notice. Because of the expedited nature of section 271 proceedings, section 1.4(h) of the Commission's rules will not apply to motions filed in section 271 proceedings. Thus, parties will not be allowed an extra three days (beyond the time permitted in section 1.45) to respond to
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-179A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-179A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-179A1.txt
    • U.S.C. � 405. Id. citing 47 C.F.R. � 1.106. Id. Id. citing U.S. CONST. amend. V. ``Opposition to Petition for Reconsideration filed by Mobile Relay Associates'' filed by Mobile Radio Service, Inc. (filed Sept. 17, 2001) (Opposition). Section 1.106 requires that oppositions to reconsideration petitions be filed within ten days after the petition is filed. See 47 C.F.R. �� 1.106(g); 1.45(b). MRSI filed its Opposition on September 17, 2001, twenty-one days after MRA's Petition was filed. MRSI indicates that MRA has no objection to a five-day extension of time. Opposition at 3. We dismiss the Opposition because MRSI has not shown good cause for its late filing. ``It is the policy of the Commission that extensions of time shall not be
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1815A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1815A1.txt
    • Bureau, (202) 418-1460; TTY: 418-2555. Unless otherwised specified, interested parties may file comments with respect to these notifications within 14 days of the date of this public notice (see Section 1.4(b)(4)). The notifying carrier may respond within 10 days after any such pleadings are filed, and the parties that filed such pleadings may reply within 5 days. See Section 63.52(c), 1.45(c)-(j). It is requested that such comments refer to the notification file number shown above. A copy of the notification is available for public inspection in the Reference Information Center, Court Yard Level, 445 12th Street, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20554. Singapore Telecom USA, Inc. Notification Pursuant to Section 63.11 of the Commission's rules, Singapore Telecom USA, Inc. hereby notifies the Commission
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1857A2.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1857A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1857A2.txt
    • but before the due date for replies will be treated as early-filed replies; and dispositive motions filed after the due date for replies will be treated as ex parte submissions. Such motions will be counted toward the applicable page limit for the submitting party. Non-dispositive motions (e.g., motions to strike) will be subject to the default pleading cycle in section 1.45 of the Commission's rules, unless the Commission or Bureau determines otherwise in a public notice. Because of the expedited nature of section 271 proceedings, section 1.4(h) of the Commission's rules will not apply to motions filed in section 271 proceedings. Thus, parties will not be allowed an extra three days (beyond the time permitted in section 1.45) to respond to
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1893A2.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1893A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1893A2.txt
    • but before the due date for replies will be treated as early-filed replies; and dispositive motions filed after the due date for replies will be treated as ex parte submissions. Such motions will be counted toward the applicable page limit for the submitting party. Non-dispositive motions (e.g., motions to strike) will be subject to the default pleading cycle in section 1.45 of the Commission's rules, unless the Commission or Bureau determines otherwise in a public notice. Because of the expedited nature of section 271 proceedings, section 1.4(h) of the Commission's rules will not apply to motions filed in section 271 proceedings. Thus, parties will not be allowed an extra three days (beyond the time permitted in section 1.45) to respond to
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1945A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1945A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1945A1.txt
    • any other type of sanction to be necessary or justified at this time. 32. Finally, Lincoln asserts that we should sanction Minority for filing frivolous pleadings that have abused the Commission's processes. We decline to do so. Minority's pleadings filed relative to our underwriting investigation were not unauthorized from a procedural standpoint. See, e.g., 47 C.F.R. � 1.41 and � 1.45. From a substantive standpoint, while we do not accept most of Minority's contentions, we do not find that the licensee has presented facts or legal arguments in a manner lacking good-faith or inconsistent with its right to advocate its views. IV. Ordering Clauses 33. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to Section 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended,
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1992A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1992A1.txt
    • Bureau, (202) 418-1460; TTY: 418-2555. Unless otherwised specified, interested parties may file comments with respect to these notifications within 14 days of the date of this public notice (see Section 1.4(b)(4)). The notifying carrier may respond within 10 days after any such pleadings are filed, and the parties that filed such pleadings may reply within 5 days. See Section 63.52(c), 1.45(c)-(j). It is requested that such comments refer to the notification file number shown above. A copy of the notification is available for public inspection in the Reference Information Center, Court Yard Level, 445 12th Street, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20554. Qwest Services Corporation Notification Pursuant to Section 63.11 of the Commission's rules, Qwest Services Corporation hereby notifies the Commission of their
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2129A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2129A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2129A1.txt
    • ``to start the 90-day review process anew, or to accord such evidence no weight.'' Comments By Interested Third Parties. Pursuant to our procedures governing section 271 applications and sections 1.415 and 1.419 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.415, 1.419, interested parties may file comments on such information. Comments must be filed by September 4, 2002. We waive section 1.45 of the Commission's rules insofar as it permits reply comments. All such filings shall refer to the Commission docket numbers, WC Docket Nos. 02-148 and 02-189. Comments may be filed using the Commission's Electronic Comment Filing System (ECFS) or by filing paper copies. See Electronic Filing of Documents in Rulemaking Proceedings, 63 Fed. Reg. 24121 (1998). Comments filed through the
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2357A2.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2357A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2357A2.txt
    • but before the due date for replies will be treated as early-filed replies; and dispositive motions filed after the due date for replies will be treated as ex parte submissions. Such motions will be counted toward the applicable page limit for the submitting party. Non-dispositive motions (e.g., motions to strike) will be subject to the default pleading cycle in section 1.45 of the Commission's rules, unless the Commission or Bureau determines otherwise in a public notice. Because of the expedited nature of section 271 proceedings, section 1.4(h) of the Commission's rules will not apply to motions filed in section 271 proceedings. Thus, parties will not be allowed an extra three days (beyond the time permitted in section 1.45) to respond to
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2438A2.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2438A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2438A2.txt
    • but before the due date for replies will be treated as early-filed replies; and dispositive motions filed after the due date for replies will be treated as ex parte submissions. Such motions will be counted toward the applicable page limit for the submitting party. Non-dispositive motions (e.g., motions to strike) will be subject to the default pleading cycle in section 1.45 of the Commission's rules, unless the Commission or Bureau determines otherwise in a public notice. Because of the expedited nature of section 271 proceedings, section 1.4(h) of the Commission's rules will not apply to motions filed in section 271 proceedings. Thus, parties will not be allowed an extra three days (beyond the time permitted in section 1.45) to respond to
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2471A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2471A1.txt
    • Bureau, (202) 418-1460; TTY: 418-2555. Unless otherwised specified, interested parties may file comments with respect to these notifications within 14 days of the date of this public notice (see Section 1.4(b)(4)). The notifying carrier may respond within 10 days after any such pleadings are filed, and the parties that filed such pleadings may reply within 5 days. See Section 63.52(c), 1.45(c)-(j). It is requested that such comments refer to the notification file number shown above. A copy of the notification is available for public inspection in the Reference Information Center, Court Yard Level, 445 12th Street, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20554. Verizon Wireless Puerto Rico, Inc. Notification Pursuant to Section 63.11 of the Commission's rules, Bell Atlantic Communications, Inc. d/b/a Verizon Long
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2620A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2620A1.txt
    • Bureau, (202) 418-1460; TTY: 418-2555. Unless otherwised specified, interested parties may file comments with respect to these notifications within 14 days of the date of this public notice (see Section 1.4(b)(4)). The notifying carrier may respond within 10 days after any such pleadings are filed, and the parties that filed such pleadings may reply within 5 days. See Section 63.52(c), 1.45(c)-(j). It is requested that such comments refer to the notification file number shown above. A copy of the notification is available for public inspection in the Reference Information Center, Court Yard Level, 445 12th Street, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20554. Japan Telecom America, Inc. Notification Pursuant to Section 63.11 of the Commission's rules Japan Telecom America, Inc. hereby notifies the Commission
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3082A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3082A1.txt
    • Bureau, (202) 418-1460; TTY: 418-2555. Unless otherwised specified, interested parties may file comments with respect to these notifications within 14 days of the date of this public notice (see Section 1.4(b)(4)). The notifying carrier may respond within 10 days after any such pleadings are filed, and the parties that filed such pleadings may reply within 5 days. See Section 63.52(c), 1.45(c)-(j). It is requested that such comments refer to the notification file number shown above. A copy of the notification is available for public inspection in the Reference Information Center, Court Yard Level, 445 12th Street, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20554. Sprint Communications Company L.P. Notification Pursuant to Section 63.11 of the Commission's rules, Sprint hereby notifies the Commission of a foreign
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3301A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3301A1.txt
    • Bureau, (202) 418-1460; TTY: 418-2555. Unless otherwised specified, interested parties may file comments with respect to these notifications within 14 days of the date of this public notice (see Section 1.4(b)(4)). The notifying carrier may respond within 10 days after any such pleadings are filed, and the parties that filed such pleadings may reply within 5 days. See Section 63.52(c), 1.45(c)-(j). It is requested that such comments refer to the notification file number shown above. A copy of the notification is available for public inspection in the Reference Information Center, Court Yard Level, 445 12th Street, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20554. TTNet America, Inc. Notification Pursuant to Section 63.11 of the Commission's rules, TTNet America, Inc. hereby notifies the Commission of their
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-49A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-49A1.txt
    • Bureau, (202) 418-1460; TTY: 418-2555. Unless otherwised specified, interested parties may file comments with respect to this notification within 14 days of the date of this public notice (see Section 1.4(b)(4)). The notifying carrier may respond within 10 days after any such pleadings are filed, and the parties that filed such pleadings may reply within 5 days. See Section 63.52(c), 1.45(c)-(j). It is requested that such comments refer to the notification file number shown above. A copy of the notification is available for public inspection in the Reference Information Center, Court Yard Level, 445 12th Street, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20554. Page 1 of 1
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-684A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-684A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-684A1.txt
    • but before the due date for replies will be treated as early-filed replies; and dispositive motions filed after the due date for replies will be treated as ex parte submissions. Such motions will be counted toward the applicable page limit for the submitting party. Non-dispositive motions (e.g., motions to strike) will be subject to the default pleading cycle in section 1.45 of the Commission's rules, unless the Commission or Bureau determines otherwise in a public notice. Because of the expedited nature of section 271 proceedings, section 1.4(h) of the Commission's rules will not apply to motions filed in section 271 proceedings. Thus, parties will not be allowed an extra three days (beyond the time permitted in section 1.45) to respond to
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-751A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-751A1.txt
    • Bureau, (202) 418-1460; TTY: 418-2555. Unless otherwised specified, interested parties may file comments with respect to this notification within 14 days of the date of this public notice (see Section 1.4(b)(4)). The notifying carrier may respond within 10 days after any such pleadings are filed, and the parties that filed such pleadings may reply within 5 days. See Section 63.52(c), 1.45(c)-(j). It is requested that such comments refer to the notification file number shown above. A copy of the notification is available for public inspection in the Reference Information Center, Court Yard Level, 445 12th Street, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20554. FCN-NEW-20020306-00016 Williams Communications, LLC. Notification Pursuant to Section 63.11 of the Commission's rules, Williams Communications, LLC hereby notifies the Commission of
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1019A2.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1019A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1019A2.txt
    • but before the due date for replies will be treated as early-filed replies; and dispositive motions filed after the due date for replies will be treated as ex parte submissions. Such motions will be counted toward the applicable page limit for the submitting party. Non-dispositive motions (e.g., motions to strike) will be subject to the default pleading cycle in section 1.45 of the Commission's rules, unless the Commission or Bureau determines otherwise in a public notice. Because of the expedited nature of section 271 proceedings, section 1.4(h) of the Commission's rules will not apply to motions filed in section 271 proceedings. Thus, parties will not be allowed an extra three days (beyond the time permitted in section 1.45) to respond to
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1084A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1084A1.txt
    • Bureau, (202) 418-1460; TTY: 418-2555. Unless otherwised specified, interested parties may file comments with respect to these notifications within 14 days of the date of this public notice (see Section 1.4(b)(4)). The notifying carrier may respond within 10 days after any such pleadings are filed, and the parties that filed such pleadings may reply within 5 days. See Section 63.52(c), 1.45(c)-(j). It is requested that such comments refer to the notification file number shown above. A copy of the notification is available for public inspection in the Reference Information Center, Court Yard Level, 445 12th Street, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20554. i-21 USA Inc. Notification Pursuant to Section 63.21(a) of the Commission's rules, i-21 USA Inc. hereby notifies the Commission of their
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1093A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1093A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1093A1.txt
    • ``to start the 90-day review process anew, or to accord such evidence no weight.'' Comments By Interested Third Parties. Pursuant to our procedures governing section 271 applications and sections 1.415 and 1.419 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.415, 1.419, interested parties may file comments on such information. Comments must be filed by April 9, 2003. We waive section 1.45 of the Commission's rules insofar as it permits reply comments. All such filings shall refer to the Commission docket numbers, WC Docket Nos. 03-16. Comments may be filed using the Commission's Electronic Comment Filing System (ECFS) or by filing paper copies. See Electronic Filing of Documents in Rulemaking Proceedings, 63 Fed. Reg. 24121 (1998). Comments filed through the ECFS can
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-125A2.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-125A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-125A2.txt
    • but before the due date for replies will be treated as early-filed replies; and dispositive motions filed after the due date for replies will be treated as ex parte submissions. Such motions will be counted toward the applicable page limit for the submitting party. Non-dispositive motions (e.g., motions to strike) will be subject to the default pleading cycle in section 1.45 of the Commission's rules, unless the Commission or Bureau determines otherwise in a public notice. Because of the expedited nature of section 271 proceedings, section 1.4(h) of the Commission's rules will not apply to motions filed in section 271 proceedings. Thus, parties will not be allowed an extra three days (beyond the time permitted in section 1.45) to respond to
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-136A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-136A1.txt
    • Bureau, (202) 418-1460; TTY: 418-2555. Unless otherwised specified, interested parties may file comments with respect to these notifications within 14 days of the date of this public notice (see Section 1.4(b)(4)). The notifying carrier may respond within 10 days after any such pleadings are filed, and the parties that filed such pleadings may reply within 5 days. See Section 63.52(c), 1.45(c)-(j). It is requested that such comments refer to the notification file number shown above. A copy of the notification is available for public inspection in the Reference Information Center, Court Yard Level, 445 12th Street, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20554. ACC Acquisition LLC Notification Pusuant to Section 63.11 of the Commission's rules, ACC Acquisition LLC hereby notifies the Commission of their
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-156A2.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-156A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-156A2.txt
    • but before the due date for replies will be treated as early-filed replies; and dispositive motions filed after the due date for replies will be treated as ex parte submissions. Such motions will be counted toward the applicable page limit for the submitting party. Non-dispositive motions (e.g., motions to strike) will be subject to the default pleading cycle in section 1.45 of the Commission's rules, unless the Commission or Bureau determines otherwise in a public notice. Because of the expedited nature of section 271 proceedings, section 1.4(h) of the Commission's rules will not apply to motions filed in section 271 proceedings. Thus, parties will not be allowed an extra three days (beyond the time permitted in section 1.45) to respond to
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1914A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1914A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1914A1.txt
    • (Maricao Letter). On Dec. 7, 2000, HITN's Maricao applications were granted. See ITFS Public Notice Report No. 266 (rel. Dec. 12, 2000). That grant has become final. Opposition to Consolidated Petition to Deny (filed Jul. 31, 1995) (Opposition). Mendez Consolidated Reply (filed Aug. 10, 1995) (Reply). HITN's comments on the Reply are not an authorized pleading. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.45. However, because the comments provide information that will be helpful in resolving this proceeding, we will waive the pleading limitations of Section 1.45 on our own motion and consider HITN's comments. See Applications for renewal of License of Certain Broadcast Stations Serving Melbourne, Florida and Other Communities in the Florida Area, Memorandum Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability,
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2039A2.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2039A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2039A2.txt
    • but before the due date for replies will be treated as early-filed replies; and dispositive motions filed after the due date for replies will be treated as ex parte submissions. Such motions will be counted toward the applicable page limit for the submitting party. Non-dispositive motions (e.g., motions to strike) will be subject to the default pleading cycle in section 1.45 of the Commission's rules, unless the Commission or Bureau determines otherwise in a public notice. Because of the expedited nature of section 271 proceedings, section 1.4(h) of the Commission's rules will not apply to motions filed in section 271 proceedings. Thus, parties will not be allowed an extra three days (beyond the time permitted in section 1.45) to respond to
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2282A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2282A1.txt
    • Bureau, (202) 418-1460; TTY: 418-2555. Unless otherwised specified, interested parties may file comments with respect to these notifications within 14 days of the date of this public notice (see Section 1.4(b)(4)). The notifying carrier may respond within 10 days after any such pleadings are filed, and the parties that filed such pleadings may reply within 5 days. See Section 63.52(c), 1.45(c)-(j). It is requested that such comments refer to the notification file number shown above. A copy of the notification is available for public inspection in the Reference Information Center, Court Yard Level, 445 12th Street, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20554. AT&T Wireless Services, Inc. Notification Pursuant to Section 63.11 of the Commission's rules, AT&T Wireless Services, Inc. hereby notifies the Commission
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2344A2.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2344A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2344A2.txt
    • but before the due date for replies will be treated as early-filed replies; and dispositive motions filed after the due date for replies will be treated as ex parte submissions. Such motions will be counted toward the applicable page limit for the submitting party. Non-dispositive motions (e.g., motions to strike) will be subject to the default pleading cycle in section 1.45 of the Commission's rules, unless the Commission or Bureau determines otherwise in a public notice. Because of the expedited nature of section 271 proceedings, section 1.4(h) of the Commission's rules will not apply to motions filed in section 271 proceedings. Thus, parties will not be allowed an extra three days (beyond the time permitted in section 1.45) to respond to
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2554A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2554A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2554A1.txt
    • Division, Media Bureau Request for Emergency Stay of Local Rate Order (``Request''), filed June 9, 2003. Opposition of the City of Los Angeles, California to Request for Emergency Stay of Local Rate Order (``Opposition''), filed June 16, 2003. On June 18, 2003, Adelphia filed a Reply to Opposition to Request for Emergency Stay of Local Rate Order. 47 C.F.R. � 1.45(d) provides that replies to oppositions to requests for stay or other temporary relief should not be filed and will not be considered. Virginia Petroleum Jobbers Ass'n v. FPC, 259 F.2d 921, 925 (D.C. Cir. 1958). See Cuomo v. NRC, 772 F.2d 972, 974 (D.C. Cir. 1985); Wisconsin Gas Co. v. FERC, 758 F.2d 669, 674 (D.C. Cir. 1985); Washington Metropolitan
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2580A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2580A1.txt
    • Bureau, (202) 418-1460; TTY: 418-2555. Unless otherwised specified, interested parties may file comments with respect to these notifications within 14 days of the date of this public notice (see Section 1.4(b)(4)). The notifying carrier may respond within 10 days after any such pleadings are filed, and the parties that filed such pleadings may reply within 5 days. See Section 63.52(c), 1.45(c)-(j). It is requested that such comments refer to the notification file number shown above. A copy of the notification is available for public inspection in the Reference Information Center, Court Yard Level, 445 12th Street, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20554. NewSouth Communications Corp. Notification Pursuant to Section 63.11 of the Commission's rules, NewSouth Communications Corp. hereby notifies the Commission of their
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2713A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2713A1.txt
    • Bureau, (202) 418-1460; TTY: 418-2555. Unless otherwised specified, interested parties may file comments with respect to these notifications within 14 days of the date of this public notice (see Section 1.4(b)(4)). The notifying carrier may respond within 10 days after any such pleadings are filed, and the parties that filed such pleadings may reply within 5 days. See Section 63.52(c), 1.45(c)-(j). It is requested that such comments refer to the notification file number shown above. A copy of the notification is available for public inspection in the Reference Information Center, Court Yard Level, 445 12th Street, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20554. GSM CORRIDOR, LLC Notification Pursuant to Section 63.11 of the Commission's rules, GSM Corridor, LLC hereby notifies the Commission of their
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2716A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2716A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2716A1.txt
    • recon. denied, 56 RR 2d 448 (1984). In an attached exhibit, petitioner's engineering consultant explained that a January 2000, map of Madison, obtained in preparation of the reply comments, indicated that not all of the Madison city limits were contained within the actual predicted 70 dBu contour, as petitioner had thought. 13 FCC Rcd 2303 ((M.M.Bur.1998). See 47 C.F.R. � 1.45(a). Petitioner explained that it had not received a service copy of STG's motion and that the certificate of service for the motion showed the wrong address for petitioner's counsel. Petitioner also stated that additional response time was necessary due to prior commitments on the part of petitioner's consulting engineer. Noblesville, Indianapolis, and Fishers, Indiana, MM Docket No. 01-143, DA 03-1118
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2799A2.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2799A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2799A2.txt
    • but before the due date for replies will be treated as early-filed replies; and dispositive motions filed after the due date for replies will be treated as ex parte submissions. Such motions will be counted toward the applicable page limit for the submitting party. Non-dispositive motions (e.g., motions to strike) will be subject to the default pleading cycle in section 1.45 of the Commission's rules, unless the Commission or Bureau determines otherwise in a public notice. Because of the expedited nature of section 271 proceedings, section 1.4(h) of the Commission's rules will not apply to motions filed in section 271 proceedings. Thus, parties will not be allowed an extra three days (beyond the time permitted in section 1.45) to respond to
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2843A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2843A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2843A1.txt
    • See Inforum Communications, Inc., Response (filed Dec. 4, 2001). Thereafter, Inforum, TDI, and Paradise filed a substantial number of additional briefs, often introducing new arguments that were not previously raised by the parties in their prior filings. See, e.g., We find that the briefs were untimely filed outside the pleading cycle permitted by the Commission's Rules. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.45. We deny the parties leave to file such pleadings. We further note that, even if we were to grant the parties' leave to file additional responsive pleadings, parties may not thereby take such leave as an invitation to raise new issues unless specifically permitted to do so. However, as noted below, we will take official notice of pertinent court opinions
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2862A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2862A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2862A1.txt
    • carriers at subscriber terminals. Petitioners assert that the deviation beyond tolerance is small, not perceivable by television viewers, and will not have an adverse impact on the quality of signal received by consumers. Petitioner seeks both permanent relief pursuant to Sections 1.3 and 76.7 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.3 & 76.7, and interim relief pursuant to Section 1.45(d) and (e) of the Commission's rule, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.45(d) - (e). Comments and oppositions to the request for permanent relief are due within 30 days from the date of this Public Notice. Petitioner's reply is due 20 days thereafter. Comments and oppositions to the request for interim relief are due within 7 days from the date of this notice.
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2863A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2863A1.txt
    • Bureau, (202) 418-1460; TTY: 418-2555. Unless otherwised specified, interested parties may file comments with respect to these notifications within 14 days of the date of this public notice (see Section 1.4(b)(4)). The notifying carrier may respond within 10 days after any such pleadings are filed, and the parties that filed such pleadings may reply within 5 days. See Section 63.52(c), 1.45(c)-(j). It is requested that such comments refer to the notification file number shown above. A copy of the notification is available for public inspection in the Reference Information Center, Court Yard Level, 445 12th Street, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20554. AT&T Wireless Services, Inc. Notification Pursuant to Section 63.11 of the Commission's rules, AT&T Wireless Services, Inc. hereby notifies the Commission
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3003A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3003A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3003A1.txt
    • rules and consider the evidence, ``to start the 90-day review process anew, or to accord such evidence no weight.'' Comments By Interested Third Parties. Pursuant to our procedures governing section 271 applications and sections 1.415 and 1.419 of the Commission's rules, interested parties may file comments on such information. Comments must be filed by October 7, 2003. We waive section 1.45 of the Commission's rules insofar as it permits reply comments. All such filings shall refer to the Commission docket number, WC Docket No. 03-167. Comments may be filed using the Commission's Electronic Comment Filing System (ECFS) or by filing paper copies. Comments filed through the ECFS can be sent as an electronic file via the Internet to http://www.fcc.gov/cgb/ecfs/. Generally, only
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3007A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3007A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3007A1.txt
    • Joint Petitioners to file their reply comments. Therefore, we use our discretion to rule ex parte, and grant the Joint Petitioners' request for extension of time to file reply comments. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 5(c) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 154(i), 154(j) 155(c), and sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.45 and 1.46 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.45, and 1.46, the joint petition for extension of time filed by Qwest Corporation, BellSouth Telecommunications, Inc., and SBC Communications Inc. IS GRANTED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Tamara L. Preiss Chief, Pricing Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau See Pleading Cycle Established for Joint Petition of Qwest, BellSouth, and SBC for
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3018A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3018A1.txt
    • Bureau, (202) 418-1460; TTY: 418-2555. Unless otherwised specified, interested parties may file comments with respect to these notifications within 14 days of the date of this public notice (see Section 1.4(b)(4)). The notifying carrier may respond within 10 days after any such pleadings are filed, and the parties that filed such pleadings may reply within 5 days. See Section 63.52(c), 1.45(c)-(j). It is requested that such comments refer to the notification file number shown above. A copy of the notification is available for public inspection in the Reference Information Center, Court Yard Level, 445 12th Street, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20554. GSM CORRIDOR, LLC Notification Pursuant to Section 63.11 of the Commission's rules, GSM Corridor, LLC hereby notifies the Commission of their
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3029A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3029A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3029A1.txt
    • Time at 3. This representation indicates that AT&T and WorldCom satisfied the requirement to notify Verizon of their motion under section 1.46(c) of the Commission's rules. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.46(c). We note that our rules prohibit the filing of replies to oppositions to stay motions, and that any such replies, if filed, ``will not be considered.'' 47 C.F.R. � 1.45(d). 47 C.F.R. � 1.1208. (...continued from previous page) (Continued....) Federal Communications Commission DA 03-3029 Federal Communications Commission DA 03-3029 . = � � � �@��� h� �@��� F '' � �
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-30A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-30A1.txt
    • Bureau, (202) 418-1460; TTY: 418-2555. Unless otherwised specified, interested parties may file comments with respect to these notifications within 14 days of the date of this public notice (see Section 1.4(b)(4)). The notifying carrier may respond within 10 days after any such pleadings are filed, and the parties that filed such pleadings may reply within 5 days. See Section 63.52(c), 1.45(c)-(j). It is requested that such comments refer to the notification file number shown above. A copy of the notification is available for public inspection in the Reference Information Center, Court Yard Level, 445 12th Street, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20554. Equant Operations Inc. Notification Pursuant to Section 63.11 of the Commission's rules Equant Operations Inc. hereby notify the Commission of their
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3121A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3121A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3121A1.txt
    • Submarine Cable Landing Licenses, Wireless Licenses and Section 214 Authorizations, and Request Declaratory Ruling Allowing Indirect Foreign Ownership, IB Docket No. 02-286, DA 02-2299, 17 FCC Rcd 17206 (Int'l Bur. 2002) (providing the following filing dates: October 21, 2002 for first-round petitions/comments; November 5, 2002 for second-round oppositions/responses; and November 18, 2002 for third-round replies). See also 47 C.F.R. � 1.45 (pleadings and filing periods). Comments of Communications Workers of America, IB Docket No. 02-286 (filed Oct. 21, 2002) (``CWA Comments''). CWA, which represents employees and retirees of the Frontier companies that formerly were owned by Global Crossing, argues that the Applicants have failed to demonstrate the public interest benefits of the proposed transaction, and therefore asks the Commission to deny
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3184A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3184A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3184A1.txt
    • Petition for Special and Interim Relief (``Petition'') on behalf of itself and its cable system operator customers seeking a waiver of Section 76.605(a)(2) to allow continued use of the Model 510 and Model 510A boxes by its cable operator customers. Pace also seeks an interim waiver of Section 76.605(a)(2) and requests that we grant it ex parte pursuant to Section 1.45(e) of the Commission's Rules or that we follow the reduced filing periods prescribed in Section 1.45(d). We have elected to consider the request for interim relief in accordance with Section 1.45(d). The Petition was put on Public Notice on September 10, 2003. Comments on the interim waiver were due on September 17, 2003. No comments have been received. The Petition
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3216A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3216A1.txt
    • Bureau, (202) 418-1460; TTY: 418-2555. Unless otherwised specified, interested parties may file comments with respect to these notifications within 14 days of the date of this public notice (see Section 1.4(b)(4)). The notifying carrier may respond within 10 days after any such pleadings are filed, and the parties that filed such pleadings may reply within 5 days. See Section 63.52(c), 1.45(c)-(j). It is requested that such comments refer to the notification file number shown above. A copy of the notification is available for public inspection in the Reference Information Center, Court Yard Level, 445 12th Street, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20554. IIJ AMERICA, INC. Notification Pursuant to Section 63.11 of the Commission's rules, IIJ America Inc. hereby notifies the Commission of their
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3818A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3818A1.txt
    • Bureau, (202) 418-1460; TTY: 418-2555. Unless otherwised specified, interested parties may file comments with respect to these notifications within 14 days of the date of this public notice (see Section 1.4(b)(4)). The notifying carrier may respond within 10 days after any such pleadings are filed, and the parties that filed such pleadings may reply within 5 days. See Section 63.52(c), 1.45(c)-(j). It is requested that such comments refer to the notification file number shown above. A copy of the notification is available for public inspection in the Reference Information Center, Court Yard Level, 445 12th Street, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20554. Sprint Communications Company L.P. Notification Pursuant to Section 63.11 of the Commission's Rules, Sprint Communications Company, L.P. hereby notifies the Commission
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3945A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3945A1.txt
    • Bureau, (202) 418-1460; TTY: 418-2555. Unless otherwised specified, interested parties may file comments with respect to these notifications within 14 days of the date of this public notice (see Section 1.4(b)(4)). The notifying carrier may respond within 10 days after any such pleadings are filed, and the parties that filed such pleadings may reply within 5 days. See Section 63.52(c), 1.45(c)-(j). It is requested that such comments refer to the notification file number shown above. A copy of the notification is available for public inspection in the Reference Information Center, Court Yard Level, 445 12th Street, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20554. TracFone Wireless, Inc. Notification Pursuant to Section 63.11 of the Commission's rules, TracFone Wireless, Inc. hereby notifies the Commission of their
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-493A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-493A1.txt
    • Bureau, (202) 418-1460; TTY: 418-2555. Unless otherwised specified, interested parties may file comments with respect to these notifications within 14 days of the date of this public notice (see Section 1.4(b)(4)). The notifying carrier may respond within 10 days after any such pleadings are filed, and the parties that filed such pleadings may reply within 5 days. See Section 63.52(c), 1.45(c)-(j). It is requested that such comments refer to the notification file number shown above. A copy of the notification is available for public inspection in the Reference Information Center, Court Yard Level, 445 12th Street, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20554. Cable & Wireless USA, Inc. Notification Pursuant to Section 63.11 of the Commission's rules, Cable & Wireless USA, Inc. hereby notifies
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-791A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-791A1.txt
    • Bureau, (202) 418-1460; TTY: 418-2555. Unless otherwised specified, interested parties may file comments with respect to these notifications within 14 days of the date of this public notice (see Section 1.4(b)(4)). The notifying carrier may respond within 10 days after any such pleadings are filed, and the parties that filed such pleadings may reply within 5 days. See Section 63.52(c), 1.45(c)-(j). It is requested that such comments refer to the notification file number shown above. A copy of the notification is available for public inspection in the Reference Information Center, Court Yard Level, 445 12th Street, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20554. GAINS International Infocom Holdings BV Notification Pursuant to Section 63.11 of the rules, Gains International Infocom Holdings BV hereby notifies the
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-843A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-843A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-843A1.txt
    • MHz spectrum. Petition to Deny at 1-2. Nextel argues that the Commission should deny Olson's modification application ``in light of the pendency of the Motion for Revocation.'' We do not consider this argument because we are dismissing the application on other grounds. In this Order, we consider Olson's late-filed opposition, as well as her unauthorized Response to Nextel's Reply. Section 1.45 of the Commission's rules requires parties to file an opposition within ten days of the date on which the petition to deny is filed. 47 C.F.R. � 1.45(b). Olson filed her opposition late because Nextel filed its Petition to Deny on March 19, 2002, establishing a deadline for filing oppositions of March 29, 2002, and Olson filed her Opposition on
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-92A2.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-92A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-92A2.txt
    • but before the due date for replies will be treated as early-filed replies; and dispositive motions filed after the due date for replies will be treated as ex parte submissions. Such motions will be counted toward the applicable page limit for the submitting party. Non-dispositive motions (e.g., motions to strike) will be subject to the default pleading cycle in section 1.45 of the Commission's rules, unless the Commission or Bureau determines otherwise in a public notice. Because of the expedited nature of section 271 proceedings, section 1.4(h) of the Commission's rules will not apply to motions filed in section 271 proceedings. Thus, parties will not be allowed an extra three days (beyond the time permitted in section 1.45) to respond to
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1066A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1066A1.txt
    • Bureau, (202) 418-1460; TTY: 418-2555. Unless otherwised specified, interested parties may file comments with respect to these notifications within 14 days of the date of this public notice (see Section 1.4(b)(4)). The notifying carrier may respond within 10 days after any such pleadings are filed, and the parties that filed such pleadings may reply within 5 days. See Section 63.52(c), 1.45(c)-(j). It is requested that such comments refer to the notification file number shown above. A copy of the notification is available for public inspection in the Reference Information Center, Court Yard Level, 445 12th Street, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20554. France Telecom Long Distance USA, LLC Notification FCN-NEW-20031216-00026P Pursuant to Section 63.11 of the Commission's rules, France Telecom Long Distance USA,
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1488A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1488A1.txt
    • Bureau, (202) 418-1460; TTY: 418-2555. Unless otherwised specified, interested parties may file comments with respect to these notifications within 14 days of the date of this public notice (see Section 1.4(b)(4)). The notifying carrier may respond within 10 days after any such pleadings are filed, and the parties that filed such pleadings may reply within 5 days. See Section 63.52(c), 1.45(c)-(j). It is requested that such comments refer to the notification file number shown above. A copy of the notification is available for public inspection in the Reference Information Center, Court Yard Level, 445 12th Street, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20554. Page 2 of 2
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1635A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1635A1.txt
    • Bureau, (202) 418-1460; TTY: 418-2555. Unless otherwised specified, interested parties may file comments with respect to these notifications within 14 days of the date of this public notice (see Section 1.4(b)(4)). The notifying carrier may respond within 10 days after any such pleadings are filed, and the parties that filed such pleadings may reply within 5 days. See Section 63.52(c), 1.45(c)-(j). It is requested that such comments refer to the notification file number shown above. A copy of the notification is available for public inspection in the Reference Information Center, Court Yard Level, 445 12th Street, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20554. TracFone Wireless, Inc. Notification Pursuant to Section 63.11 of the Commission's rules, TracFone Wireless, Inc. hereby notifies the Commission of its
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2069A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2069A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2069A1.txt
    • (AR0295, AR0296), Dubach (LA0288), Hamburg (AR0082), Junction City (AR0294), Junction City (LA0293), Lake Bruin (LA0256), Lincoln (LA0289), Norphlet (AR0243), Smackover (AR0242), Spokane (LA0327), Tensas (LA0306), and Union (LA0290); CSR-6272-M - Fountain Hill (AR0563). Classic also filed a Motion to Strike KEJB's Opposition to Classic's Request for Partial Stay of Order, arguing that the opposition was untimely filed, pursuant to Section 1.45(d) of the Commission's rules. While we agree with Classic that the opposition was filed without benefit of motion for a late filed pleading and outside of the filing date specified in Section 1.45(d), we shall accept the pleading in order to ensure a complete record in this matter. The signal strength studies are included as exhibits in Classic's Partial Petition
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2134A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2134A1.txt
    • Bureau, (202) 418-1460; TTY: 418-2555. Unless otherwised specified, interested parties may file comments with respect to these notifications within 14 days of the date of this public notice (see Section 1.4(b)(4)). The notifying carrier may respond within 10 days after any such pleadings are filed, and the parties that filed such pleadings may reply within 5 days. See Section 63.52(c), 1.45(c)-(j). It is requested that such comments refer to the notification file number shown above. A copy of the notification is available for public inspection in the Reference Information Center, Court Yard Level, 445 12th Street, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20554. AT&T CORP Notification FCN-NEW-20040526-00021P Pursuant to Section 63.11 of the Commission's rules, AT&T Corp. hereby notifies the Commission of its foreign
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2456A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2456A1.txt
    • Bureau, (202) 418-1460; TTY: 418-2555. Unless otherwised specified, interested parties may file comments with respect to these notifications within 14 days of the date of this public notice (see Section 1.4(b)(4)). The notifying carrier may respond within 10 days after any such pleadings are filed, and the parties that filed such pleadings may reply within 5 days. See Section 63.52(c), 1.45(c)-(j). It is requested that such comments refer to the notification file number shown above. A copy of the notification is available for public inspection in the Reference Information Center, Court Yard Level, 445 12th Street, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20554. LATAM Telecomunicaciones, L.L.C. Notification Pursuant to Section 63.11 of the Commission's rules, LATAM Telecomunicaciones, L.L.C. hereby notifies the Commission of its
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2550A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2550A1.txt
    • Bureau, (202) 418-1460; TTY: 418-2555. Unless otherwised specified, interested parties may file comments with respect to these notifications within 14 days of the date of this public notice (see Section 1.4(b)(4)). The notifying carrier may respond within 10 days after any such pleadings are filed, and the parties that filed such pleadings may reply within 5 days. See Section 63.52(c), 1.45(c)-(j). It is requested that such comments refer to the notification file number shown above. A copy of the notification is available for public inspection in the Reference Information Center, Court Yard Level, 445 12th Street, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20554. Telmex USA, L.L.C. Notification Pursuant to Section 63.11 of the Commission's rules, Telmex USA, L.L.C. hereby notifies the Commission of its
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2607A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2607A1.txt
    • not meet the Commission's technical rules and will cause interference to adjacent satellite operations. After meeting with PanAmSat and other satellite operators, and revisiting frequency bands in which it seeks to communicate, SWE-DISH reduced the list of satellites with which it seeks to communicate and its proposed frequency bands to the following: Service Sat ellit e Operator 10*95-1 s20 1 1.45-1 1.7 Loral International PanAmSat Target Satellite Nominal Orbital Position (W.L.) 37.5" 45" Uplink Spectrum (GHz) 14.0- 14.5 14.0- 14.5 I AMC-5 I SES Americom I 79" I 14.0-14.5 I AMC-3 I SES Americom 1 87" I 14.0-14.5 I Telstar-6 1 Loral I 93" 1 14.0-14.5 I Galaxy-3C I PanAmSat 1 95" I 14.0-14.5 11.7-12.2 Domestic 0 11.7-12.2 1 Domestic 11.7-12.2
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2988A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2988A1.txt
    • Bureau, (202) 418-1460; TTY: 418-2555. Unless otherwised specified, interested parties may file comments with respect to these notifications within 14 days of the date of this public notice (see Section 1.4(b)(4)). The notifying carrier may respond within 10 days after any such pleadings are filed, and the parties that filed such pleadings may reply within 5 days. See Section 63.52(c), 1.45(c)-(j). It is requested that such comments refer to the notification file number shown above. A copy of the notification is available for public inspection in the Reference Information Center, Court Yard Level, 445 12th Street, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20554. LATAM Telecomunicaciones, L.L.C. Notification Pusuant to Section 63.11 of the Commission's rules, LATAM TElecomunicaciones, L.L.C. hereby notifies the Commission of their
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-323A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-323A1.txt
    • add steerable uplink and fixed downlink spot beams to facilitate any needed coordination with previously licensed satellite systems in allotted extended Ku- band.'"' Upon technical review, we find that Echostar's Amendment is inconsistent in the frequency assignments it requests. In both the Application and the Amendment, EchoStar states that it requests authority to operate in the 10.70-10.75 GHz, and 11.20-1 1.45 GHz frequency bands (downlinks) and the 12.75-13.00 GHz and 13.15-13.20 GHz frequency bands (uplinks)." However, the Channel Frequency Plan outlined in Table A.4-1 of Section A.4 of the Attachment to the Amendment provides information that is significantly different fiom those fiequencies proposed in both the Application and in other portions of the Amendment. Specifically, the Channel Frequency Plan indicates that
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3272A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3272A1.txt
    • Bureau, (202) 418-1460; TTY: 418-2555. Unless otherwised specified, interested parties may file comments with respect to these notifications within 14 days of the date of this public notice (see Section 1.4(b)(4)). The notifying carrier may respond within 10 days after any such pleadings are filed, and the parties that filed such pleadings may reply within 5 days. See Section 63.52(c), 1.45(c)-(j). It is requested that such comments refer to the notification file number shown above. A copy of the notification is available for public inspection in the Reference Information Center, Court Yard Level, 445 12th Street, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20554. SAVVIS, Inc. Notification Pursuant to Section 63.11 of the Commission's rules, Savvis, Inc. hereby notifies the Commission of its foreign carrier
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3347A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3347A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3347A1.txt
    • 47 U.S.C. �309(b). 47 U.S.C. �309(d)(2). 47 U.S.C. ��309(c)(1) and 309(d)(1). 47 C.F.R. � 21.41(a). Second Modification Application at 1. Grant Notice. Rullman Petition to Deny at 8. Rullman filed her petition to deny AIG's Second Modification Application on September 13, 2001. Oppositions would have been due 10 days later, with replies due five days after that. 47 C.F.R. � 1.45(b), (c). 47 U.S.C. �309(d). Rullman Petition to Deny at 6-7. 47 C.F.R. � 21.902(b)(4). See Amendment of Parts 1, 21, and 74 to Enable Multipoint Distribution Service and Instructional Television Fixed Service Licensees to Engage in Fixed Two-Way Transmissions, MM Docket No. 97-217, Report and Order on Reconsideration, 14 FCC Rcd 12764, 12796 � 70 (1999). We dismiss the E&H
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3923A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3923A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3923A1.txt
    • GRANTED to the extent described herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the period for filing FCC Form 382 in the above-captioned proceeding IS EXTENDED through January 27, 2005. This action is taken pursuant to authority found in Sections 4(i) and 303(r) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 154(i) and 303(r), and Sections 0.204(b), 0.283, and 1.45 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.204(b), 0.283, and 1.45. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION W. Kenneth Ferree Chief, Media Bureau Report and Order, 19 FCC Rcd 18,279 (2004). Id. at 18,297, � 43. See http://www.fcc.gov. (...continued from previous page) (continued....) Federal Communications Commission DA 04-3923 Federal Communications Commission DA 04-3923 � � � � � ht $ gdt gdt gdt
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-776A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-776A1.txt
    • Bureau, (202) 418-1460; TTY: 418-2555. Unless otherwised specified, interested parties may file comments with respect to these notifications within 14 days of the date of this public notice (see Section 1.4(b)(4)). The notifying carrier may respond within 10 days after any such pleadings are filed, and the parties that filed such pleadings may reply within 5 days. See Section 63.52(c), 1.45(c)-(j). It is requested that such comments refer to the notification file number shown above. A copy of the notification is available for public inspection in the Reference Information Center, Court Yard Level, 445 12th Street, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20554. North American Communications Limited Notification Pursuant to Section 63.11 of the Commission's rules, North American Communications Limited hereby notifies the Commission
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-89A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-89A1.txt
    • Bureau, (202) 418-1460; TTY: 418-2555. Unless otherwised specified, interested parties may file comments with respect to these notifications within 14 days of the date of this public notice (see Section 1.4(b)(4)). The notifying carrier may respond within 10 days after any such pleadings are filed, and the parties that filed such pleadings may reply within 5 days. See Section 63.52(c), 1.45(c)-(j). It is requested that such comments refer to the notification file number shown above. A copy of the notification is available for public inspection in the Reference Information Center, Court Yard Level, 445 12th Street, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20554. GSM CORRIDOR, LLC Notification Pursuant to Section 63.11 of the Commission's rules, GSM Corridor, LLC notifies the Commission of its foreign
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-960A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-960A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-960A1.txt
    • of only one other station. The proposed 60 dB� contour also would encompass portions of U.S. Highways 20 and 26 that presently receive no radio service. While the populations of these ``white'' and ``gray'' areas are only 864 persons and 208 persons respectively, the areas themselves are extensive and, outside of Alaska, rare. 47 U.S.C. � 316. 47 C.F.R. � 1.45(c) prohibits petitioners from raising new matters in reply pleadings. We will waive that provision here due to the importance of the statutory issue raised. 47 U.S.C. � 316 (a)(1), in pertinent part, provides that: Any station license or construction permit may be modified by the Commission either for a limited time or for the duration of the term thereof, if
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1268A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1268A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1268A1.txt
    • of Verestar, Inc. (Debtor-in-Possession) for Consent to Assignment of Licenses to SES Americom, Inc., Memorandum, Opinion, Order and Authorization, IB Docket No. 04-174, DA 04-3639, 19 FCC Rcd 22750, 22756, para. 16 (Int'l Bur. & Wireless Tele. Bur. 2004). We find that the letter is not timely filed, and we dismiss the letter on procedural grounds. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.45; Acceptable for Filing Public Notice, supra note 2 (filings in proceeding due by March 31). Today's grant of the above-referenced assignment application (File No. SCL-ASG-20050304-00003) authorizes VSNL USA to acquire from Tyco Telecom the New Jersey cable station, the portions of Tyco Atlantic extending between the New Jersey cable station and the twelve-nautical-mile limit of the U.S. territorial sea, and
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1553A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1553A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1553A1.txt
    • of arguments and analysis in the form of ex parte submissions after the reply comment deadline. All other filing requirements set forth in the FNPRM remain in effect. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 4(i) and 303(r) of the Communications Act, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 154(i) and 303(r), and sections 0.91, 0.204(b), 0.291, 1.45, and 1.415 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.204(b), 0.291, 1.45, and 1.415, the deadline for filing reply comments in response to the FNPRM IS EXTENDED to July 20, 2005. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Thomas J. Navin Acting Chief, Wireline Competition Bureau Developing a Unified Intercarrier Compensation Regime, CC Docket No. 01-92, Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, FCC 05-33
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1560A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1560A1.txt
    • Bureau, (202) 418-1460; TTY: 418-2555. Unless otherwised specified, interested parties may file comments with respect to these notifications within 14 days of the date of this public notice (see Section 1.4(b)(4)). The notifying carrier may respond within 10 days after any such pleadings are filed, and the parties that filed such pleadings may reply within 5 days. See Section 63.52(c), 1.45(c)-(j). It is requested that such comments refer to the notification file number shown above. A copy of the notification is available for public inspection in the Reference Information Center, Court Yard Level, 445 12th Street, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20554. Stratos Telecom, Inc. Notification Pursuant to Section 63.11 of the Commission's rules, Stratos Telecom, Inc. hereby notifies the Commission of the
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-164A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-164A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-164A1.txt
    • GRANTED to the extent described herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the period for filing FCC Form 382 in the above-captioned proceeding IS EXTENDED through February 10, 2005. This action is taken pursuant to authority found in Sections 4(i) and 303(r) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 154(i) and 303(r), and Sections 0.204(b), 0.283, and 1.45 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.204(b), 0.283, and 1.45. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION W. Kenneth Ferree Chief, Media Bureau Report and Order, 19 FCC Rcd 18,279 (2004). Id. at 18,297, � 43. See Order Granting Extension of Time to File First Round DTV Channel Election Forms, MB Docket No. 03-15, DA 04-3923, released December 21, 2004. The Media Bureau
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1870A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1870A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1870A1.txt
    • allow parties adequate time to review and respond to the record in this proceeding. All other filing requirements set forth in the NPRM remain in effect. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 4(i), 4(j), and 303(r) of the Communications Act, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 154(i), 154(j), and 303(r), and sections 0.91, 0.204(b), 0.291, 1.45, and 1.415 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.204(b), 0.291, 1.45, and 1.415, the deadline for filing reply comments in response to the NPRM IS EXTENDED to July 29, 2005. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Tamara L. Preiss Chief, Pricing Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Special Access Rates for Price Cap Local Exchange Carriers; AT&T Corp. Petition for Rulemaking to
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1939A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1939A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1939A1.txt
    • additional time to investigate the pleading's accuracy. Southern opposed the Motion, arguing that assuming arguendo the Ownership Report was only publicly available as of November 17, Piedmont still had more than 30 days to review the Report and prepare its Reply and should not be granted additional time. We will grant Piedmont's motion and accept its Reply. Pursuant to Section 1.45 of the Commission's rules, Southern's Opposition was due on November 13, 2003, and Piedmont's Reply would be due on November 18, 2003. Southern did not file its opposition until December 3, 2003 - Commission records do not reveal a motion for extension of time from Southern -- and Piedmont filed its Motion more than two weeks later, on December 19,
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1983A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1983A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1983A1.txt
    • the pleading's accuracy. Southern opposed the Motion, arguing that assuming arguendo the Ownership Report was only publicly available as of November 17, Piedmont still had more than 30 days to review the Report and prepare its Reply and should not be granted additional time to file its Reply. We will grant Piedmont's motion and accept its Reply. Pursuant to Section 1.45 of the Commission's rules, Southern's Opposition was due on November 13, 2003, and Piedmont's Reply would be due on November 18, 2003. Southern did not file its opposition until December 3, 2003 - Commission records do not reveal a motion for extension of time from Southern -- and Piedmont filed its Motion more than two weeks later, on December 19,
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2023A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2023A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2023A1.txt
    • the Second Motion on June 8, 2005, and it ultimately filed its ``Reply to Opposition to Objection to Construction Permit'' on June 22, 2005. Although we do not question this statement, we observe that there is no evidence of EMHT's involvement anywhere in Duke's Informal Objection. Duke Motion for Extension of Time (May 18, 2005), at 2. 47 C.F.R. � 1.45, which governs filing periods for pleadings, covers formal Petitions to Deny and not Informal Objections. See, e.g., Tabback Broadcasting Company, 15 FCC Rcd 11899 (2000) (``the limitations on the number and timing of pleadings filed in response to petitions to deny are inapplicable to informal objections''). 47 C.F.R. � 1.1307. 47 C.F.R. � 1.65(a), which states that each applicant is
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2402A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2402A1.txt
    • Bureau, (202) 418-1460; TTY: 418-2555. Unless otherwised specified, interested parties may file comments with respect to these notifications within 14 days of the date of this public notice (see Section 1.4(b)(4)). The notifying carrier may respond within 10 days after any such pleadings are filed, and the parties that filed such pleadings may reply within 5 days. See Section 63.52(c), 1.45(c)-(j). It is requested that such comments refer to the notification file number shown above. A copy of the notification is available for public inspection in the Reference Information Center, Court Yard Level, 445 12th Street, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20554. Cellco Partnership Notification Pursuant to Section 63.11 of the Commission's rules, Cellco Partnership hereby notifies the Commission of the foreign carrier
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2683A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2683A1.txt
    • Bureau, (202) 418-1460; TTY: 418-2555. Unless otherwised specified, interested parties may file comments with respect to these notifications within 14 days of the date of this public notice (see Section 1.4(b)(4)). The notifying carrier may respond within 10 days after any such pleadings are filed, and the parties that filed such pleadings may reply within 5 days. See Section 63.52(c), 1.45(c)-(j). It is requested that such comments refer to the notification file number shown above. A copy of the notification is available for public inspection in the Reference Information Center, Court Yard Level, 445 12th Street, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20554. Page 2 of 2
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3014A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3014A1.txt
    • Bureau, (202) 418-1460; TTY: 418-2555. Unless otherwised specified, interested parties may file comments with respect to these notifications within 14 days of the date of this public notice (see Section 1.4(b)(4)). The notifying carrier may respond within 10 days after any such pleadings are filed, and the parties that filed such pleadings may reply within 5 days. See Section 63.52(c), 1.45(c)-(j). It is requested that such comments refer to the notification file number shown above. A copy of the notification is available for public inspection in the Reference Information Center, Court Yard Level, 445 12th Street, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20554. Equant Inc. Notification Pursuant to Section 63.11 of the Commission's rules, Equant, Inc. herby notifies the Commission of its affiliation with
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-301A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-301A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-301A1.txt
    • deadline for filing comments in response to the FNPRM IS EXTENDED to April 1, 2005, and the deadline for filing reply comments IS EXTENDED to May 2, 2005. This action is taken pursuant to authority found in Sections 4(i) and 303(r) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 154(i) and 303(r), and Sections 0.204(b), 0.283, and 1.45 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.204(b), 0.283, and 1.45. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION W. Kenneth Ferree Chief, Media Bureau See FCC 04-221, released November 23, 2004. Id. at �� 71-72. Id. at � 73. See Request for Extension of Time to File Comments of Children Now, American Psychological Association, American Academy of Pediatrics, American Academy of Child and Adolescent
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3037A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3037A1.txt
    • Bureau, (202) 418-1460; TTY: 418-2555. Unless otherwised specified, interested parties may file comments with respect to these notifications within 14 days of the date of this public notice (see Section 1.4(b)(4)). The notifying carrier may respond within 10 days after any such pleadings are filed, and the parties that filed such pleadings may reply within 5 days. See Section 63.52(c), 1.45(c)-(j). It is requested that such comments refer to the notification file number shown above. A copy of the notification is available for public inspection in the Reference Information Center, Court Yard Level, 445 12th Street, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20554. Page 2 of 2
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-330A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-330A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-330A1.txt
    • Company, Opposition to Request for Acknowledgement of License Forfeiture and Correction of Database, File No.50559-CN-MP-96, filed Aug. 9, 2001 (Opposition). Forfeiture Request. See 47 C.F.R. � 21.44(a)(3). Forfeiture Request at 2; Reply at 2-3. Id. Forfeiture Request at 2. Opposition. We do not condone National Television's failure to file a timely response to the Forfeiture Request. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.45(b) (oppositions shall be filed within 10 days after a motion or request is filed). We direct National Television to be more diligent in the future in filing timely responses to pleadings filed before the Commission. We conclude, however, that the public interest would be better served by considering National Television's Opposition. Id. at 1-2. Id. at 2. Id. at 3.
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-40A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-40A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-40A1.txt
    • Deny (filed Aug. 1, 2001) (Petition to Deny). See File No. BALMD-9550181 (granted Dec. 4, 1995). See File No. BPMD-9253354 (granted Oct. 14, 1993). Forfeiture Petition. Id. at 2-3. Id. Id. at 2-3. A declaration by Mr. Hopkins is attached to the Forfeiture Petition. See id., Exhibit A (Transmission Survey Report). Opposition. Eagleview acknowledged that, pursuant to Section 21.30 and 1.45 of the Commission's rules, an opposition was due by May 29, 1997, but filed a motion to accept a late filed opposition. Eagleview Motion to Accept Late Filed Opposition (filed Jun. 11, 1997). While we do not condone Eagleview's failure to file a timely opposition, we grant its motion and consider its opposition in the interest of having a complete
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-629A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-629A1.txt
    • Bureau, (202) 418-1460; TTY: 418-2555. Unless otherwised specified, interested parties may file comments with respect to these notifications within 14 days of the date of this public notice (see Section 1.4(b)(4)). The notifying carrier may respond within 10 days after any such pleadings are filed, and the parties that filed such pleadings may reply within 5 days. See Section 63.52(c), 1.45(c)-(j). It is requested that such comments refer to the notification file number shown above. A copy of the notification is available for public inspection in the Reference Information Center, Court Yard Level, 445 12th Street, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20554. CINGULAR WIRELESS LLC Notification Pursuant to Section 63.11 of the Commission's rules, Cingular Wireless, LLC and its subsidiaries hereby notifies the
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-82A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-82A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-82A1.txt
    • �� 1.41, 1.43 that the Motion for Partial Stay of Decision Pending Appellate Review submitted by Mobile Relay Associates and Skitronics, LLC, in the above-captioned proceeding on November 19, 2004, IS DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to the authority of Section 4(i) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. � 154(i), and sections 1.41, 1.43 and 1.45 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.41, 1.43, 1.45 that the Reply to Opposition to Motion for Partial Stay of Decision Pending Appellate Review submitted by Mobile Relay Associates and Skitronics, LLC, in the above-captioned proceeding on December 7, 2004, IS DISMISSED. . FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Michael J. Wilhelm Chief, Public Safety and Critical Infrastructure Division Wireless Telecommunications Bureau
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1059A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1059A1.txt
    • Bureau, (202) 418-1460; TTY: 418-2555. Unless otherwised specified, interested parties may file comments with respect to these notifications within 14 days of the date of this public notice (see Section 1.4(b)(4)). The notifying carrier may respond within 10 days after any such pleadings are filed, and the parties that filed such pleadings may reply within 5 days. See Section 63.52(c), 1.45(c)-(j). It is requested that such comments refer to the notification file number shown above. A copy of the notification is available for public inspection in the Reference Information Center, Court Yard Level, 445 12th Street, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20554. People with Disabilities: To request materials in accessible formats for people with disabilities (braille, large print, electronic files, audio format), send
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1094A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1094A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1094A1.txt
    • cover two-thirds of an EA's population within ten years of initial license grant. Id. We also note that Intelligent Transportation & Monitoring Wireless LLC (ITM) joined in various pleadings filed by the Havens Group in November 2005 and thereafter. Mr. Havens is the majority interest holder, and serves as President, of ITM. 47 C.F.R. � 1.41. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.45(b) (``oppositions to any motion, petition, or request may be filed within 10 days after the original pleading is filed''); 47 C.F.R. � 1.45(c) (``the person who filed the original pleading may reply to opposition within 5 days after the time for filing opposition has expired''). See Havens Opposition Erratum Version (Nov. 30, 2005). The Havens Group filed numerous additional pleadings,
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1401A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1401A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1401A1.txt
    • 1.41. Finally, if we were to consider the merits of the petition, we would deny it. Contrary to the assertion in the petition, Havens was not prejudiced by the extension because the extension did not delay the overall review and resolution of the petition to deny. Moreover, Havens is incorrect about alleged procedural defects, because, as PSI points out, Section 1.45(e) of the Commission's Rules permits ex parte disposition of requests for extension of time without waiting for the filing of oppositions or replies. In addition, we grant PSI's motion for leave to file a supplement indicating that it has decided to abandon the Wailuku site. Havens argues that the supplement should not be accepted because PSI should not be permitted
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1408A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1408A1.txt
    • Bureau, (202) 418-1460; TTY: 418-2555. Unless otherwised specified, interested parties may file comments with respect to these notifications within 14 days of the date of this public notice (see Section 1.4(b)(4)). The notifying carrier may respond within 10 days after any such pleadings are filed, and the parties that filed such pleadings may reply within 5 days. See Section 63.52(c), 1.45(c)-(j). It is requested that such comments refer to the notification file number shown above. A copy of the notification is available for public inspection in the Reference Information Center, Court Yard Level, 445 12th Street, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20554. People with Disabilities: To request materials in accessible formats for people with disabilities (braille, large print, electronic files, audio format), send
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1582A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1582A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1582A1.txt
    • IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to Section 4(i) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. � 154(i), the Motion to Strike filed by Maritime Communications/Land Mobile, LLC on November 18, 2005, IS DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to Section 4(i) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. � 154(i), and Section 1.45 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.45, the Amended Erratum Request to Accept Apparently Late Filing Of Petition to Deny filed by Warren C. Havens, Intelligent Transportation & Monitoring Wireless LLC, AMTS Consortium, LLC, Telesaurus-VPC, LLC (Telesaurus), and Telesaurus Holdings GB LLC on November 16, 2005, IS DISMISSED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to Section 4(i) of the
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1586A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1586A1.txt
    • Bureau, (202) 418-1460; TTY: 418-2555. Unless otherwised specified, interested parties may file comments with respect to these notifications within 14 days of the date of this public notice (see Section 1.4(b)(4)). The notifying carrier may respond within 10 days after any such pleadings are filed, and the parties that filed such pleadings may reply within 5 days. See Section 63.52(c), 1.45(c)-(j). It is requested that such comments refer to the notification file number shown above. A copy of the notification is available for public inspection in the Reference Information Center, Court Yard Level, 445 12th Street, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20554. People with Disabilities: To request materials in accessible formats for people with disabilities (braille, large print, electronic files, audio format), send
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1619A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1619A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1619A1.txt
    • of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 154(i), 312, and Section 1.91 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.91, the Petition for Revocation of License filed by Ferrari Equipment Company on August 24, 2004, IS DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to Sections 4(i) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. � 154(i), and Section 1.45 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.45, the Request for Acceptance of Supplement to Opposition to to [sic] Petition to Dismiss or Deny filed by Earth Incorporated and ESP Wireless Technology Group, Inc. on January 12, 2006 IS DENIED, and the Supplement to Opposition to Petition to Dismiss or Deny filed by Earth Incorporated and ESP Wireless Technology Group,
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1882A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1882A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1882A1.txt
    • Order and Second Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, 21 FCC Rcd 4753 (2006) (``Designated Entity Second Report and Order''), modified by erratum, 21 FCC Rcd 6622 (2006), clarified by Order on Reconsideration, 21 FCC Rcd 6703 (2006). See 47 C.F.R. �� 1.2104(g), 1.2107(c). 47 C.F.R. �� 1.919, 1.2107(f). See 47 C.F.R. � 1.65. 47 C.F.R. � 1.2108(b). 47 C.F.R. �� 1.45(b), 1.2108(c). 47 C.F.R. �� 1.45(c), 1.2108(c). See Commission Taking Tough Measures Against Frivolous Pleadings, Public Notice, 11 FCC Rcd 3030 (1996). 47 C.F.R. �� 1.2105(a)(2)(viii), 1.2105(c)(1). See also Amendment of Part 1 of the Commission's Rules - Competitive Bidding Procedures, WT Docket No. 97-82, Seventh Report and Order, 16 FCC Rcd 17546 (2001); Amendment of Part 1 of the Commission's
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1931A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1931A1.txt
    • Bureau, (202) 418-1460; TTY: 418-2555. Unless otherwised specified, interested parties may file comments with respect to these notifications within 14 days of the date of this public notice (see Section 1.4(b)(4)). The notifying carrier may respond within 10 days after any such pleadings are filed, and the parties that filed such pleadings may reply within 5 days. See Section 63.52(c), 1.45(c)-(j). It is requested that such comments refer to the notification file number shown above. A copy of the notification is available for public inspection in the Reference Information Center, Court Yard Level, 445 12th Street, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20554. People with Disabilities: To request materials in accessible formats for people with disabilities (braille, large print, electronic files, audio format), send
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2368A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2368A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2368A1.txt
    • due. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to Sections 1.3 and 1.925 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.3, 1.925, the Request for Waiver filed by Maritime Communications/Land Mobile, LLC on August 21, 2006, IS DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to Section 4(i) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. � 154(i), and Section 1.45 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.45, the Request to Place on Public Notice, Request for Leave to Supplement, and Request to Dismiss filed by Warren C. Havens on September 12, 2006, IS DISMISSED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to Section 4(i) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. � 154(i), and Section 1.45 of
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-493A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-493A1.txt
    • Bureau, (202) 418-1460; TTY: 418-2555. Unless otherwised specified, interested parties may file comments with respect to these notifications within 14 days of the date of this public notice (see Section 1.4(b)(4)). The notifying carrier may respond within 10 days after any such pleadings are filed, and the parties that filed such pleadings may reply within 5 days. See Section 63.52(c), 1.45(c)-(j). It is requested that such comments refer to the notification file number shown above. A copy of the notification is available for public inspection in the Reference Information Center, Court Yard Level, 445 12th Street, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20554. People with Disabilities: To request materials in accessible formats for people with disabilities (braille, large print, electronic files, audio format), send
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-674A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-674A1.txt
    • Bureau, (202) 418-1460; TTY: 418-2555. Unless otherwised specified, interested parties may file comments with respect to these notifications within 14 days of the date of this public notice (see Section 1.4(b)(4)). The notifying carrier may respond within 10 days after any such pleadings are filed, and the parties that filed such pleadings may reply within 5 days. See Section 63.52(c), 1.45(c)-(j). It is requested that such comments refer to the notification file number shown above. A copy of the notification is available for public inspection in the Reference Information Center, Court Yard Level, 445 12th Street, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20554. People with Disabilities: To request materials in accessible formats for people with disabilities (braille, large print, electronic files, audio format), send
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-786A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-786A1.txt
    • Bureau, (202) 418-1460; TTY: 418-2555. Unless otherwised specified, interested parties may file comments with respect to these notifications within 14 days of the date of this public notice (see Section 1.4(b)(4)). The notifying carrier may respond within 10 days after any such pleadings are filed, and the parties that filed such pleadings may reply within 5 days. See Section 63.52(c), 1.45(c)-(j). It is requested that such comments refer to the notification file number shown above. A copy of the notification is available for public inspection in the Reference Information Center, Court Yard Level, 445 12th Street, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20554. People with Disabilities: To request materials in accessible formats for people with disabilities (braille, large print, electronic files, audio format), send
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-932A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-932A1.txt
    • Bureau, (202) 418-1460; TTY: 418-2555. Unless otherwised specified, interested parties may file comments with respect to these notifications within 14 days of the date of this public notice (see Section 1.4(b)(4)). The notifying carrier may respond within 10 days after any such pleadings are filed, and the parties that filed such pleadings may reply within 5 days. See Section 63.52(c), 1.45(c)-(j). It is requested that such comments refer to the notification file number shown above. A copy of the notification is available for public inspection in the Reference Information Center, Court Yard Level, 445 12th Street, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20554. People with Disabilities: To request materials in accessible formats for people with disabilities (braille, large print, electronic files, audio format), send
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1176A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1176A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1176A1.txt
    • 21 FCC Rcd 6703 (2006). 47 C.F.R. �� 1.2104(g), 1.2107(c). 47 C.F.R. �� 1.919, 1.2107(f). We note that the FCC Form 602 ownership reporting requirement can be fulfilled by referencing the file number, date, and name of filer of the appropriate FCC Form 602. See discussion below, Attachment C. 47 C.F.R. � 1.65. 47 C.F.R. � 1.2108(b). 47 C.F.R. �� 1.45(b), 1.2108(c). 47 C.F.R. �� 1.45(c), 1.2108(c). See Commission Taking Tough Measures Against Frivolous Pleadings, Public Notice, 11 FCC Rcd 3030 (1996). 47 C.F.R. �� 1.2105(a)(2)(viii), 1.2105(c)(1). See also Amendment of Part 1 of the Commission's Rules - Competitive Bidding Procedures, WT Docket No. 97-82, Seventh Report and Order, 16 FCC Rcd 17546 (2001); id., Order on Reconsideration of the Third
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1240A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1240A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1240A1.txt
    • other substantive serious misconduct such as misrepresentation to the Commission or criminal convictions that affected an applicant or licensee's basic qualifications. There is no allegation or indication that the parties to the assignment application in this case engaged in such misconduct. Petition at 7. Staff Ruling, 20 FCC Rcd at 9944. Id. See note 15 supra. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.45; see also Discussion Radio, Inc., Memorandum Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability, 19 FCC Rcd 7433, 7435 (2004); Secret Communications II, LLC, Memorandum Opinion and Order, 18 FCC Rcd 9139, 9139 n. 1 (2003); Kin Shaw Wong, Memorandum Opinion and Order, 11 FCC Rcd 11928, 11930 (1996). Golden Gulf claims to also have employed other, non-managerial, staff at
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1359A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1359A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1359A1.txt
    • Leave to File Supplement to Petition for Reconsideration and Request to Rescind Grant of FM Translator Permit'' and the subject Supplement, noting that, subsequent to the filing of the Petition, EMF filed an application (File No. BMPFT-20050718ABY) to modify the Fontana permit, specifying a new transmitter site. This pleading is not authorized under the Commission's Rules, see 47 C.F.R. � 1.45, and EMF's modification application was dismissed on July 22, 2005. Accordingly Amaturo's Motion will be denied. Letter to Educational Media Foundation, Reference 1800B3 (MB Mar. 7, 2005). Additionally, on July 18, 2005, as observed at note 1, supra, EMF filed a minor modification application for Station K244DK, specifying a new transmitter site. The staff dismissed that application on July 22,
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-148A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-148A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-148A1.txt
    • for Reconsideration (February 3, 2006); Request to Accept Supplement to Petition for Reconsideration (February 6, 2006). The material in the supplement, consisting largely of pleadings from litigation involving Mobex, could have been presented earlier in this proceeding, and is of limited probative value. Consequently, the Request to Accept Supplement to Petition for Reconsideration is denied. See, e.g., 47 C.F.R. � 1.45; Kim Shaw Wong, Memorandum Opinion and Order, 11 FCC Rcd 11928, 11930 � 7 (1996). See Notice of Dismissal, File No. 0001885281. See Public Notice, Report No. 2185 (rel. June 22, 2005). See MC/LM Order, 20 FCC Rcd at 17957-58 � 2. Petition for Reconsideration (filed December 9, 2005) (MC/LM Petition). On December 22, 2005, Mobex filed an Opposition to
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2079A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2079A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2079A1.txt
    • [ * * * REDACTED * * * ] information Network seeks to provide in its Reply is not germane to the bases of our determination here, see n.16, infra, and Network has made no showing of extraordinary circumstances to justify the filing of a reply not contemplated by the rules, we deny that motion. See generally 47 C.F.R. � 1.45(d). We therefore need not address APCC's filings regarding Network's request: APCC Services, Inc. v. NetworkIP, LLC and Network Enhanced Services, LLP, Opposition to Defendant's Motion for Leave to File a Reply, File No. EB-03-MD-011 (filed May 16, 2007); APCC Services, Inc. v. NetworkIP, LLC and Network Enhanced Services, LLP, Conditional Motion for Leave to File Opposition to Defendant's Reply (filed
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2142A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2142A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2142A1.txt
    • 1.2109(b)-(c). 47 C.F.R. � 1.2109(d). 47 C.F.R. �� 1.2104(g), 1.2107(c). 47 C.F.R. �� 1.919, 1.2107(f). We note that the FCC Form 602 ownership reporting requirement can be fulfilled by referencing the file number, date, and name of filer of the appropriate FCC Form 602. See discussion below, Attachment F. 47 C.F.R. � 1.65. 47 C.F.R. � 1.2108(b). 47 C.F.R. �� 1.45(b), 1.2108(c). 47 C.F.R. �� 1.45(c), 1.2108(c). See Commission Taking Tough Measures Against Frivolous Pleadings, Public Notice, 11 FCC Rcd 3030 (1996). 47 C.F.R. �� 1.2105(a)(2)(viii), 1.2105(c)(1). See also Amendment of Part 1 of the Commission's Rules - Competitive Bidding Procedures, WT Docket No. 97-82, Seventh Report and Order, 16 FCC Rcd 17546 (2001); Order on Reconsideration of the Third Report
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2148A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2148A1.txt
    • Bureau, (202) 418-1460; TTY: 418-2555. Unless otherwised specified, interested parties may file comments with respect to these notifications within 14 days of the date of this public notice (see Section 1.4(b)(4)). The notifying carrier may respond within 10 days after any such pleadings are filed, and the parties that filed such pleadings may reply within 5 days. See Section 63.52(c), 1.45(c)-(j). It is requested that such comments refer to the notification file number shown above. A copy of the notification is available for public inspection in the Reference Information Center, Court Yard Level, 445 12th Street, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20554. People with Disabilities: To request materials in accessible formats for people with disabilities (braille, large print, electronic files, audio format), send
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2846A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2846A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2846A1.txt
    • 1.2109(b)-(c). 47 C.F.R. � 1.2109(d). 47 C.F.R. �� 1.2104(g), 1.2107(c). 47 C.F.R. �� 1.919, 1.2107(f). We note that the FCC Form 602 ownership reporting requirement can be fulfilled by referencing the file number, date, and name of filer of the appropriate FCC Form 602. See discussion in Attachment D. 47 C.F.R. � 1.65. 47 C.F.R. � 1.2108(b). 47 C.F.R. �� 1.45(b), 1.2108(c). 47 C.F.R. �� 1.45(c), 1.2108(c). See Commission Taking Tough Measures Against Frivolous Pleadings, Public Notice, 11 FCC Rcd 3030 (1996). 47 C.F.R. �� 1.2105(a)(2)(viii), 1.2105(c)(1). See also Amendment of Part 1 of the Commission's Rules - Competitive Bidding Procedures, WT Docket No. 97-82, Seventh Report and Order, 16 FCC Rcd 17546 (2001); Order on Reconsideration of the Third Report
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2870A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2870A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2870A1.txt
    • 1.939 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.939, the Petition to Deny or, Alternatively, to Impose Conditions filed by Verizon on April 6, 2007 IS GRANTED to the extent indicated and is otherwise DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to Sections 4(i) and 309 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 154(i), 309, and Sections 1.45(b) and 1.939(f) of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.45(b) and 1.939(f), that the Reply Comments to Verizon's Petition to Deny, or, Alternatively, to Impose Conditions filed by Wireless Strategies, Inc. on April 27, 2007 IS DISMISSED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to Sections 4(i) and 309 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 154(i), 309,
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3109A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3109A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3109A1.txt
    • of abuse. If, however, the licensee fails to meet that standard, the Commission may deny the application - after notice and opportunity for a hearing under Section 309(e) of the Act - or grant the application ``on terms and conditions that are appropriate, including a renewal for a term less than the maximum otherwise permitted.'' Procedural Issue. Pursuant to Section 1.45 of the Commission's rules, White Pine's response to the September 1, 2005, Petition was due within 10 days, but it was not filed until October 19, 2005, approximately six weeks later. White Pine blames its untimely filing on Ruby's failure to serve it ``in a direct manner.'' Both parties acknowledge that White Pine's designated Contact Representative, Joseph R. Christensen (``Christensen''),
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-317A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-317A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-317A1.txt
    • Net Standard Year Studied Viewing Error Weekly Error Hours Circulation Nov. 04/ Feb. 05/ 12 0.05 0.06 2.38 2.88 May 05 Nov. 05/ Feb. 06/ 17 0.42 0.45 3.87 4.67 May 06 TABLE 3 - WFMY-TV VIEWING IN HILLSBOROUGH, NC Survey Households Share Standard Net Standard Year Studied Viewing Error Weekly Error Hours Circulation Nov. 04/ Feb. 05/ 7 1.30 1.45 8.08 9.20 May 05 Nov. 05/ Feb. 06/ 3 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 May 06 As a result, WRAL-TV requests that the Commission grant its petition so that it can assert its exclusivity rights in Durham, Sanford and Hillsborough, North Carolina. We find that WRAL-TV made the requisite showing to support its petition. As required by the rules, WRAL-TV has
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3470A4.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3470A4.txt
    • 2.65 2.55 2.67 2.72 Children'sProgramming "Children'sProgramming" 1.70 1.91 2.15 1.94 GMoviesorTV-Y/TV-Y7TV 3.18 3.28 3.04 2.94 Eitheroftheabove 4.88 5.19 5.19 4.88 FamilyProgramming NetworksTargetingFamilies 11.46 10.89 10.69 10.74 TY-GProgramming 11.35 12.18 11.93 10.94 Arts,Educational,orDocumentaryProgramming 8.32 7.46 7.05 7.62 Eitherofthetwoabove 19.67 19.64 18.98 18.56 AdultProgramming NetworksShowingAdultProgramming 4.84 4.60 4.89 5.52 NC-17MoviesorTV-MA-S/TV-MA-LTV 0.75 0.48 0.63 0.83 ViolentProgramming "ViolentProgramming" 1.52 1.71 1.94 1.63 TV-PG-VTelevision 1.43 1.45 1.54 1.41 TV-14-VTelevision 1.37 1.40 1.56 1.51 TV-MA-VTelevision 0.15 0.16 0.23 0.22 Anyofthethreeabove 2.95 3.01 3.33 3.14 Anyofthelasttwoabove 1.52 1.56 1.79 1.73 ReligiousProgramming NetworksShowingPrimarilyReligiousProgramming 1.64 1.56 1.49 1.40 "ReligiousProgramming" 3.31 3.15 2.92 2.79 OverallTargeting AverageTVContentRating(wherenotedforTV) 3.71 3.75 3.84 3.93 AverageMPAARating(wherenotedformovies) 3.99 3.93 3.98 3.95 Observations 61,31464,56067,53071,984 Notes:Reportedinthetableisthepercentageofquarter-hoursofprogrammingbyprogramtypeandyear. ItistheanalogofTable6splitoutbyyear.Averageisoverthesamenetworksandtimeperiodsdescribed inthenotestoTable6.Source:Authorcalculations.39 Table11: ProgramAvailabilitybyProgramTypeandTime 6:00p.m.-12:00a.m.EST(orequivalent),2weeks/year,2003-2006 Variable 2003 2004 2005 2006 NewsProgramming AnyNews 47.79
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3470A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3470A5.txt
    • (EMR Data) II - 41 Table II-11 - ZINB Regression Results: Public Affairs Dependent Variable Independent Variables P-value Factor E[y|x] P-value Factor Pr(y=0|z) In-Market Stations Owned by Parent 0.0302 0.3310 1.0307 -0.0801 0.1740 0.9230 16.18* Out-of-Market Stations Owned by Parent 0.0002 0.2360 1.0002 -0.0005 0.1090 0.9995 0.09** Distance between Station and Parent (in ln(miles)) -0.0001 0.9990 0.9999 0.0103 0.8490 1.0103 -1.45 Waived Prohibition on In-Market Newspaper Cross- ownership (1=yes) 0.4783***0.0080 1.6134 -1.7962** 0.0380 0.1659 744.13* Cross-owned with TV Station in DMA (1=yes) 0.1324 0.4080 1.1416 0.1934 0.5530 1.2133 -5.48 Percentage of Other Market Stations with News Format -0.0064 0.3150 0.9936 0.0132 0.2080 1.0133 -2.90* Total Stations in the Market 0.0014 0.6880 1.0014 -0.0108* 0.0780 0.9892 1.75* Market Median Commute Time 0.0044
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3470A6.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3470A6.txt
    • of Stations with Cross-Owned Newspaper Percent of Stations with Cross-Owned TV Station Number of Commercial Stations Owned Nationally by In-Market Owners Marg. Effect T-Stat Marg. Effect T-Stat Marg. Effect T-Stat Marg. Effect T-Stat Marg. Effect T-Stat Adj R-Squared N Format 101 Count 2.867 (0.27) 0.296* (5.96) 10.3716 (0.44) 1.871 (0.58) 0.001932* (3.45) 0.726 104 Format 101 HHI -0.098 (1.17) -0.001 (1.45) -0.1761 (-0.95) 0.013 (0.51) -0.000011* (-2.52) 0.072 104 Format 20 Count 1.226 (0.17) 0.116* (3.55) 11.1151 (0.72) 0.578 (0.27) 0.000810* (2.20) 0.426 104 Format 20 HHI -0.203 (1.94) -0.001 (1.79) -0.3479 (-1.52) 0.025 (0.80) -0.000008 (-1.42) 0.074 104 Format 11 Count -0.441 (0.13) 0.040* (2.47) -4.0090 (-0.53) -1.588 (-1.53) 0.000417* (2.31) 0.209 104 Format 11 HHI -0.219* (2.23) -0.001 (1.55)
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3470A7.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3470A7.txt
    • 4 and 5, see above); absolute values of t-statistics in parentheses (using heteroscedastic-consistent standard errors corrected for clustering by television station). ***p<.01, **p<.05, and *p<.10. 51 Table 19: DMA Political Preferences and Slant of Cross-Owned Stations Difference in Candidate Speaking Time Difference in Candidate Coverage Difference in Partisan Issue Coverage Difference in Poll Coverage Kerry vote percentage in DMA 0.1 (1.45) 0.1 (1.06) 0.7*** (2.79) 0.7** (2.38) 0.9* (1.72) 0.7 (1.30) 0.3* (1.80) 0.3* (1.93) Cross-owned newspaper -3.6 (0.77) -3.9 (0.77) -3.8 (0.52) -4.4 (0.58) -9.5 (0.80) -12.0 (0.97) -1.7 (0.83) -1.3 (0.68) Cross-owned radio 0.4 (0.15) 0.0 (0.01) 10.0 (1.39) 10.0 (1.37) -19.3 (1.03) -20.0 (1.07) -3.7 (0.85) -3.4 (0.80) Cross-owned radio and newspaper 2.7 (0.42) 4.2 (0.61) -1.0 (0.09)
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3475A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3475A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3475A1.txt
    • a petition to deny must be filed not later than 30 days after the Commission issues public notice of the acceptance of an application for filing. However, NABET's petition was filed 67 days after the public notice. Just as importantly, assert the applicants, NABET did not serve its late-filed petition on either party to the WYTV(TV) assignment application. Under Section 1.45 of the Commission's rules, a petitioner must file its petition to deny in accordance with the procedures of Section 1.939. That section requires that a ``petitioner shall serve a copy of its petition to deny on the applicant and on all other interested parties pursuant to Section 1.47.'' Furthermore, the applicants note that the certificate of service appended to the
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4453A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4453A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4453A1.txt
    • the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.1206(b). Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. See id. Pursuant to sections 1.45 and 1.49 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.45, 1.49, interested parties may file comments on the petition on or before November 13, 2007 and reply comments on or before November 23, 2007. All filings must be addressed to the Commission's Secretary, Marlene H. Dortch, Office of the Secretary, Federal Communications Commission, 445 12th Street, SW, Suite TW-A325, Washington,
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4517A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4517A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4517A1.txt
    • genuine ascertainment activities or broadcast meaningful programs that address local needs. Consolidated Reply at 4-6. Consolidated Opposition at n. 17. YMC also argues that KSJO fails to broadcast any programming that addresses issues facing the community. KSJO Reply at 10. However, because YMC first raises this argument in its reply brief, we will not consider its merits. 47 C.F.R. � 1.45(c). License Renewal Applications of Certain Commercial Radio Stations Serving Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, Memorandum Opinion and Order, 8 FCC Rcd 6400, 6401 (1993) (``Philadelphia Station License Renewals''), citing Time-Life Broadcast, Inc., Memorandum Opinion and Order, 33 FCC 2d 1081, 1082 (1972), and Office of Communications of United Church of Christ v. FCC, 707 F.2d 1413 (D.C. Cir. 1983) (subsequent history omitted). Id.
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4684A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4684A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4684A1.txt
    • by rendering its interest in BMPI nonattributable, it ``eliminated the factual predicate on which the Univision Condition was based and thereby fully resolved the concerns identified by the Commission in the 2007 Univision Order.'' Interested parties may file comments regarding the above Requests for Clarification by December 4, 2007. Given the time-sensitive nature of the requests, we are waiving Section 1.45 of the Commission's rules insofar as it permits reply comments. In accordance with Section 1.51(c) of the Commission's rules, an original and four copies of all pleadings must be filed with the Commission's Secretary, Marlene H. Dortch, Federal Communications Commission, 445 12th Street, S.W., Room TW-A325, Washington, DC 20554. Hand-delivered or messenger-delivered copies must be sent to: Federal Communications Commission,
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4750A1.pdf
    • Bureau, (202) 418-1460; TTY: 418-2555. Unless otherwised specified, interested parties may file comments with respect to these notifications within 14 days of the date of this public notice (see Section 1.4(b)(4)). The notifying carrier may respond within 10 days after any such pleadings are filed, and the parties that filed such pleadings may reply within 5 days. See Section 63.52(c), 1.45(c)-(j). It is requested that such comments refer to the notification file number shown above. A copy of the notification is available for public inspection in the Reference Information Center, Court Yard Level, 445 12th Street, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20554. People with Disabilities: To request materials in accessible formats for people with disabilities (braille, large print, electronic files, audio format), send
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4882A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4882A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4882A1.txt
    • Petition for Reconsideration on April 24, 2007. NSTN filed a Response Filed by National Science and Technology Network, Inc. (NSTN) to Petition for Reconsideration filed by Mobile Relay Associates (MRA) on April 27, 2007, which MRA on the same day moved to strike. We agree with MRA that NSTN's most recent pleading is an unauthorized surreply. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.45(c). Consequently, we grant the motion to strike the Response Filed by National Science and Technology Network, Inc. (NSTN) to Petition for Reconsideration, and will not consider the matters raised therein. National Science and Technology Network, Inc., Order, 22 FCC Rcd 3916 (WTB MD 2007) (Order). See Request to Initiate Modification Proceedings (filed October 1, 2004) (Modification Request). See FCC File
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-71A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-71A1.txt
    • Bureau, (202) 418-1460; TTY: 418-2555. Unless otherwised specified, interested parties may file comments with respect to these notifications within 14 days of the date of this public notice (see Section 1.4(b)(4)). The notifying carrier may respond within 10 days after any such pleadings are filed, and the parties that filed such pleadings may reply within 5 days. See Section 63.52(c), 1.45(c)-(j). It is requested that such comments refer to the notification file number shown above. A copy of the notification is available for public inspection in the Reference Information Center, Court Yard Level, 445 12th Street, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20554. People with Disabilities: To request materials in accessible formats for people with disabilities (braille, large print, electronic files, audio format), send
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-987A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-987A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-987A1.txt
    • 1.939(a)(2). According to M2Z, for example, if petitions to deny were filed on February 14, February 20, and March 2, and each petition were served via hand delivery, M2Z would be required to respond to these pleadings on three separate dates: February 26, March 2, and March 12. Id. at n.7. See Motion at 2, n.5 citing 47 C.F.R. �� 1.45(b) & 1.939(f). Id. See, e.g., petitions to deny filed in WT Docket No. 07-16 by AT&T Inc.; CTIA - The Wireless Association; Motorola, Inc.; NextWave Broadband, Inc.; T-Mobile USA; Verizon Wireless; and the Wireless Communications Association International, Inc. We note that, on February 16, 2007, the Bureau established a separate pleading cycle, in WT Docket No. 07-30, for a forbearance
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1416A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1416A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1416A1.txt
    • Station WKVE, Memorandum Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability, 18 FCC Rcd 23411, 23423 (2003). See Broadcast Actions, Public Notice, Report No. 46739 (May 19, 2008). See Commission States Future Policy on Incomplete and Patently Defective AM and FM Construction Permit Applications, Public Notice, FCC 84-366 (rel. Aug. 2, 1984)(the ``Processing Policy Public Notice''). See 47 C.F.R. � 1.45. See Letter to John Garziglia et al., 20 FCC Rcd 12105, 12107 (MB 2005). See 47 C.F.R. � 73.3517. The Application is contingent upon grant to the WOLB(AM) License Application. See Processing Policy Public Notice, infra at n.14. It appears that Radio One has engaged in precisely the gamesmanship it complains of by requesting that the Commission defer the processing
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1650A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1650A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1650A1.txt
    • the timing for its opposition should be governed by Section 1.115(d) of the Commission's rules, which would give MASN fifteen days to file an opposition to Time Warner's Petition, and that MASN had attempted to contact Bureau staff in an effort to confirm its understanding. MASN states that, on July 11, 2008, Bureau staff informed it that, pursuant to Section 1.45 of the Commission's rules, the deadline for filing MASN's opposition was, in fact, July 14, 2008. Among other things, MASN asserts that, given the length and complexity of Time Warner's Petition, and the importance of issues raised in the proceeding, a three-day extension of time to file an opposition is warranted. 2. We grant MASN an extension of time to
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1661A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1661A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1661A1.txt
    • (1) ``Objection to Motion for Extension of Time (Improper)''; (2) ``Motion to Strike Petition to Deny (Supplement)'' (``Supplement''); (3) ``Motion to Strike Petition to Deny (Supplement 2)'' (``Supplement 2''); and (4) ``Motion to Enlarge.'' We find that the briefs filed by ICR in July were untimely filed outside the pleading cycle permitted by the Commission's Rules. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.45. However, in the interest of a full and complete record in this proceeding, we will consider the arguments set forth in these filings. See Comparative Consideration of 76 Groups of Mutually Exclusive Applications for Permits to Construct New or Modified Noncommercial Educational FM Stations, Memorandum Opinion and Order, 22 FCC Rcd 6101 (2007) (``Comparative Consideration Order''). Id. See 47 C.F.R.
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1946A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1946A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1946A1.txt
    • at 2. Id. Id. Id. at 2-3. See id. at 3. Id. at 3-4. Id. at 4. Heller makes other arguments in the Reply regarding the status of KCI's WMCW(AM) application in relation to the WONX Application, and KCI's character as an applicant. See id. at 1-2. However, these issues were not raised in the Opposition. Therefore, pursuant to Section 1.45 of the Rules, we will not address these additional arguments. 47 C.F.R. � 1.45 (``the reply shall be limited to matters raised in the oppositions''). See Letter to Mentor Partners, Inc., Reference 1800B3-LAS/JP (MB Apr. 1, 2008). Id. at 2. 47 C.F.R. �73.37. 47 C.F.R. � 73.37(Note 2)(1). WONX Application, Attachment 11, Engineering Statement, at 3. Federal Communications Commission Washington,
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2095A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2095A1.txt
    • Bureau, (202) 418-1460; TTY: 418-2555. Unless otherwised specified, interested parties may file comments with respect to these notifications within 14 days of the date of this public notice (see Section 1.4(b)(4)). The notifying carrier may respond within 10 days after any such pleadings are filed, and the parties that filed such pleadings may reply within 5 days. See Section 63.52(c), 1.45(c)-(j). It is requested that such comments refer to the notification file number shown above. A copy of the notification is available for public inspection in the Reference Information Center, Court Yard Level, 445 12th Street, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20554. People with Disabilities: To request materials in accessible formats for people with disabilities (braille, large print, electronic files, audio format), send
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2467A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2467A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2467A1.txt
    • ``Opposition to Motion to Dismiss'') and, subsequently, a Request for Expedited Action. Given our disposition of this matter, the Request for Expedited Action will be dismissed as moot. R&R filed a contingent Motion for Extension of Time. R&R sought the extension if the Gold Coast Opposition was deemed a formal opposition governed by the filing deadlines in 47 C.F.R. � 1.45. The Motion for Extension of Time will be dismissed as moot. Gold Coast filed its Opposition ``pursuant to Section 73.3587 of the Commission's Rules'' (the ``Rules'') governing informal objections. The 47 C.F.R. � 1.45 filing deadlines do not apply to informal objections. The Application was filed pursuant to Section 73.3573(g) of the Rules which permits the modification of a station's
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2676A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2676A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2676A1.txt
    • application for Station KNHT(FM) before us, we conclude that these arguments are speculative and have no bearing on the present matter. Petition at 16-17. As Station KNHT(FM) has already been ordered to move from Channel 297C2 to 273C2, any implementation of digital operations on the old channel will be at SOU's sole risk. Reply at 6. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.45(c). See, e.g., Ponce Television Corporation� Memorandum Opinion and Order, 1 FCC Rcd 1167 n.42 (1986). Moreover, Airen counters that SOU's personnel and engineer were not hearing KZCC(FM) but were actually monitoring a translator station - K238AD operating out of Eureka, CA - which is licensed to Educational Media Foundation and which retransmits the programming of KLVG(FM). Airen states that it
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-578A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-578A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-578A1.txt
    • 4, 2007 (Response), which MRA moved to strike on June 7, 2007. Motion to Strike filed by MRA on June 7, 2007 (Motion). NSTN responded to the motion to strike. Response to Motion to Strike filed by NSTN on June 11, 2007. We agree with MRA that NSTN's Response to MRA's reply is an unauthorized reply. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.45. Contrary to NSTN's understanding, the provisions of Section 1.45 of the Commission's Rules regarding permissible pleadings apply to proceedings initiated by informal requests for Commission action pursuant to Section 1.41 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.41. See, e.g., Earth Incorporated, Order, 21 FCC Rcd 9122, 9123 n.7 (WTB PSCID 2006), recon. pending. Consequently, we grant MRA's Motion, and
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-595A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-595A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-595A1.txt
    • Rcd 15289, 15405-06 �� 319-321 (2007), recon. pending. 47 C.F.R. �� 1.2104(g), 1.2107(c). 47 C.F.R. �� 1.919, 1.2107(f). The FCC Form 601 ownership reporting requirement can be fulfilled by referencing the file number, date, and name of filer of the appropriate FCC Form 602. See discussion in Attachment D. 47 C.F.R. � 1.65. 47 C.F.R. � 1.2108(b). 47 C.F.R. �� 1.45(b), 1.2108(c). 47 C.F.R. �� 1.45(c), 1.2108(c). See 47 C.F.R. �� 1.2108(d), 1.2109(a). See Commission Taking Tough Measures Against Frivolous Pleadings, Public Notice, 11 FCC Rcd 3030 (1996). 47 C.F.R. �� 1.2105(a)(2)(viii), 1.2105(c)(1). See also Amendment of Part 1 of the Commission's Rules - Competitive Bidding Procedures, WT Docket No. 97-82, Seventh Report and Order, 16 FCC Rcd 17546 (2001); Order
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1049A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1049A1.txt
    • Bureau, (202) 418-1460; TTY: 418-2555. Unless otherwised specified, interested parties may file comments with respect to these notifications within 14 days of the date of this public notice (see Section 1.4(b)(4)). The notifying carrier may respond within 10 days after any such pleadings are filed, and the parties that filed such pleadings may reply within 5 days. See Section 63.52(c), 1.45(c)-(j). It is requested that such comments refer to the notification file number shown above. A copy of the notification is available for public inspection in the Reference Information Center, Court Yard Level, 445 12th Street, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20554. People with Disabilities: To request materials in accessible formats for people with disabilities (braille, large print, electronic files, audio format), send
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1623A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1623A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1623A1.txt
    • reply to MRA's opposition to NSTN's petition for reconsideration of the grant of MRA's application, see Reply to Opposition to Petition for Reconsideration of Grant of Station License Filed by National Science and Technology Network, Inc. (NSTN) at 1-2 (filed Apr. 28, 2008), but this was improper because it went beyond the scope of the opposition. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.45(c) (``The reply shall be limited to matters raised in the oppositions . . . .''). (...continued from previous page) (continued....) Federal Communications Commission DA 09-1623 Federal Communications Commission DA 09-1623 � � � % ( ( 0%
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1623A1_Rcd.pdf
    • reply to MRA's opposition to NSTN's petition for reconsideration of the grant of MRA's application, see Reply to Opposition to Petition for Reconsideration of Grant of Station License Filed by National Science and Technology Network, Inc. (NSTN) at 1-2 (filed Apr. 28, 2008), but this was improper because it went beyond the scope of the opposition. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.45(c) ("The reply shall be limited to matters raised in the oppositions . . . ."). 9391 Federal Communications Commission DA 09-1623 11.This action is taken under delegated authority pursuant to Sections 0.131 and 0.331 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.131, 0.331. FEDERAL COMMUNICATION COMMISSION Scot Stone Deputy Chief, Mobility Division Wireless Telecommunications Bureau 9392
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1725A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1725A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1725A1.txt
    • to Supplement with an accompanying motion, dated June 23, 2009; the County filed a Reply to Charter Supplement Response without an accompanying motion, dated July 6, 2009; Charter filed a Surreply with an accompanying Motion, dated July 10, 2009; and the County filed a Response to Charter Surreply without an accompanying Motion, dated July 14, 2009. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.45. See Petition for Recertification at 8 & supra note 15. 47 U.S.C. � 543(l)(1)(B)(i); 47 C.F.R. � 76.905(b)(2)(i). See New Petition at 3; see also 47 C.F.R. � 76.905(e)(2). Opposition at 2 n.6. Annual Assessment of the Status of Competition in the Market for the Delivery of Video Programming, Thirteenth Annual Report, 24 FCC Rcd 542, 684 (2009) (``Thirteenth Cable
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2579A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2579A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2579A1.txt
    • period between May 6, 2000 and November 2, 2000. Utopian raised this argument for the first time in its Reply, depriving WTCI and SSNE of an opportunity to respond to the allegation. Replies shall be limited to matters raised in the oppositions, and new allegations may not be made in reply pleadings. We find Utopian's actions in violation of Section 1.45(c) of the Commission's Rules, and thus, we decline to address this matter. We also deny Utopian's request to reconsider our decision finding the grant of the Assignment Application to be in the public interest. We reject Utopian's argument that we should have considered auctioning ``the BRS Stations to another would be party.'' In considering assignment applications, the Communications Act prohibits
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2579A1_Rcd.pdf
    • during the period between May 6, 2000 and November 2, 2000.41Utopian raised this argument for the first time in its Reply, depriving WTCI and SSNE of an opportunity to respond to the allegation. Replies shall be limited to matters raised in the oppositions, and new allegations may not be made in reply pleadings.42We find Utopian's actions in violation of Section 1.45(c) of the Commission's Rules, and thus, we decline to address this matter. 10.We also deny Utopian's request to reconsider our decision finding the grant of the Assignment Application to be in the public interest.43We reject Utopian's argument that we should have considered auctioning "the BRS Stations to another would be party."44In considering assignment applications, the Communications Act prohibits the Commission
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-433A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-433A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-433A1.txt
    • inquiry into Living Proof's site assurances. Accordingly, we find that the University has not established, prima facie, that Living Proof, at the time it filed its Application, did not have reasonable assurances of its site. We also decline to consider Kalish's Reply to the extent that it also questions whether Living Proof has reasonable assurance of its proposed site. Section 1.45(c) of the Rules dictates that a ``reply shall be limited to matters raised in the oppositions.'' Living Proof did not refer to site availability in its Opposition. Thus, Kalish is barred from raising that issue for the first time in his Reply. Both Kalish and the University challenged the sufficiency of Living Proof's local public notice. However, we agree with
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-524A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-524A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-524A1.txt
    • � 309(d)(1). For our purposes, an affidavit is a written statement, the truth of which is sworn to or affirmed before an officer who has authority to administer an oath, such as a notary public. Broadcast Procedure Manual, 49 FCC 2d 1, 11 (1974). See, e.g., Action Community Television Network, Inc., Letter, 23 FCC Rcd 9331, 9331-2 (MB 2008). Section 1.45(c) of the Rules indicates that replies ``shall be limited to matters raised in the oppositions.'' October 13, 2005, Motion to Strike at 2, Note 3. See e-mail from Michael Wagner, Associate Chief, Audio Division to Malcolm Stevenson, Esq. (October 2, 2007). Supplement to Motion to Strike, Attachment 3. See, e.g., Port Huron Family Radio, Inc., Decision, 66 RR 2d 545
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-536A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-536A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-536A1.txt
    • Financial Abuses of the Television Transition LLC (the ``CUT FATT'' petition). On February 24, 2009, Funai filed a ``Motion for Consolidation or, Alternatively, Extension of Time,'' requesting in part that the Commission consolidate the VIZIO Petition into the CUT FATT petition proceeding. Funai alleges that the VIZIO Petition is an ``attempt to trigger the substantially shortened pleading cycle under Section 1.45(d) of the Commission's rules,'' and is inappropriate in light of the fact that the temporary relief VIZIO seeks would not preserve the status quo. Funai also asserts that the VIZIO Petition ``raises the same issues and seeks similar relief'' as the CUT FATT petition. Therefore, Funai encourages the Commission to consolidate the petition with the CUT FATT petition in a
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-53A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-53A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-53A1.txt
    • 0.81 Noncompetitive Communities 434 4.3 0.08 416 41.0 0.91 Communities relieved from rate regulation 320 4.1 0.13 309 37.7 0.91 Second cable operator subgroup (overall) 108 4.6 0.22 103 38.4 1.15 Second cable operator subgroup (incumbents) 54 4.6 0.27 53 37.0 1.44 Second cable operator subgroup (rivals) 54 4.6 0.30 50 42.6 1.55 DBS subgroup 125 3.5 0.19 123 39.7 1.45 Wireless MVPD subgroup 31 5.2 0.28 31 29.6 1.99 Low penetration test subgroup 56 2.5 0.30 52 35.4 1.90 Source: 2006 survey. (1) Video channels showing re-transmissions in digital high definition of local broadcast stations, requiring lease of a high definition set-top converter. (2) The digital cable programming service tier with the highest number of subscribers, generally requiring lease of
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-603A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-603A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-603A1.txt
    • Cellular Telephone Company, Inc., Memorandum Opinion and Order, 6 FCC Rcd 4186 � 3 (1991) (citations omitted) (Commission does not recognize motions to revoke because commencing revocation proceedings is a matter wholly within the Commission's discretion). Id. at n.2, see also 47 C.F.R. � 1.41. Because we are treating Utopian's pleadings as informal objections, the procedural deadlines contained in Section 1.45 of the Commission's Rules do not apply. See R&R Radio Corp., Letter, DA 08-2467 (MB rel. Nov. 7, 2008) at n.2. We therefore consider all pleadings filed in this proceeding in order to ensure a complete record. See 47 U.S.C. � 310(d); 47 C.F.R. � 1.948; see also Verizon-RCC Order, 23 FCC Rcd at 12477-78 � 27; AT&T-Dobson Order, 22
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-73A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-73A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-73A1.txt
    • leased access condition), id. at 8287-88, �� 190-191 (discussing program carriage condition); but see Comcast Corporation Petition for Declaratory Ruling That The America Channel is Not a Regional Sports Network, 22 FCC Rcd 17938, 17946-47, � 24 (suspending the Adelphia program carriage condition). Adelphia Order, 21 FCC Rcd at 8336-39, App. B. See 47 U.S.C. � 309(d)(1); 47 C.F.R. �� 1.45, 1.939. 18 U.S.C. � 1464; see also 47 U.S.C. � 559 (``[w]hoever transmits over any cable system any matter which is obscene or otherwise unprotected by the Constitution of the United States shall be fined under Title 18 or imprisoned not more than 2 years, or both''). . Concerns about sexually explicit adult programming on subscription video services are more
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-889A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-889A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-889A1.txt
    • of Authorization and Transfer of Control and Modification, Initiate License Revocation Proceedings'' (filed Feb. 7, 2008) (Reply). On February 26, 2008, Ms. Kurian filed a motion for extension of time to file responsive pleadings. Motion for Extension of Time (filed February 26, 2008). We note, however, that the Reply completes the pleading cycle in this proceeding, see 47 C.F.R. � 1.45, so we deny the motion. We note that we also have received e-mails from the litigants regarding this matter. Electronic filing of pleadings (i.e., by facsimile or electronic mail) is no longer permitted, however. See Implementation of Interim Electronic Filing Procedures for Certain Commission Filings, Order, 22 FCC Rcd 11381 (2007). Accordingly, we will not separately discuss the e-mails. Nonetheless,
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-889A1_Rcd.pdf
    • to Assignment of Authorization and Transfer of Control and Modification, InitiateLicense Revocation Proceedings" (filed Feb. 7, 2008) (Reply). On February 26, 2008, Ms. Kurian filed a motion for extension of time to file responsive pleadings. Motion for Extension of Time (filed February 26, 2008). We note, however, that the Reply completes the pleading cycle in this proceeding, see47 C.F.R. � 1.45, so we deny the motion. 7We note that we also have received e-mails from the litigants regarding this matter. Electronic filing of pleadings (i.e., by facsimile or electronic mail) is no longer permitted, however. See Implementation of Interim Electronic Filing Procedures for Certain Commission Filings, Order, 22 FCC Rcd 11381 (2007). Accordingly, we will not separately discuss the e-mails. Nonetheless,
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-908A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-908A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-908A1.txt
    • s Motion for Leave and Response are {\*\bkmkstart SR\'3b1119}{\*\bkmkend SR\'3b1119}unauthorized pleading{\*\bkmkstart FN[FN15]}{\*\bkmkend FN[FN15]} s}{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs22 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs22\super }{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs22 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs22 and are subject to dismissal without consideration.}{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs22 \ltrch\fcs0 \cs18\fs22\super {\*\bkmkstart FN[FN16]}{\*\bkmkend FN[FN16]}\chftn {\footnote \ltrpar \pard\plain \ltrpar\ql \li0\ri0\widctlpar\wrapdefault\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\l in0\itap0 \rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs20\alang1025 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs20\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 {\rtlch\fcs1 \af0 \ltrch\fcs0 \cs18\super \chftn }{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0 \ltrch\fcs0 \i See }{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0 \ltrch\fcs0 47 C.F.R. \'a7 1.45. }{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0 \ltrch\fcs0 \i See, e.g., {\*\xmlopen\xmlns2{\factoidname place}}{\*\xmlopen\xmlns2{\factoidname State}}Colorado{\*\xmlclose} {\*\xmlclose} RSA 7(B)(2) Ltd. Partnership}{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0 \ltrch\fcs0 , Order, 15 FCC Rcd 3403 (WTB 2000) (declining to consider unauthorized pleadings).}{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0 \ltrch\fcs0 \i \par }}}{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs22 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs22\super }{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs22 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs22 We therefore deny the Motion for Leave and decline to consider Skywest\rquote s Response to Reply. \par }{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs22
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1038A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1038A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1038A1.txt
    • (rel. Apr. 7, 2006). On June 14, 2006, the Licensee filed a ``Petition for Leave to File Response'' and a ``Response'' to JMR's Reply, to which JMR, on June 28, 2006, filed an ``Opposition'' to Licensee's ``Petition for Leave to File Response.'' These pleadings are not authorized by the Rules and will not be considered here. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.45; see also, e.g., Secret Communications, Inc., Memorandum Opinion and Order, 18 FCC Rcd 9139 n.1 (2003) (dismissing "Motion for Disclosure of Documents" as unauthorized pursuant to Section 1.45); KOLA, Inc., Memorandum Opinion and Order, 11 FCC Rcd 14297, 14310 (1996); and Kin Shaw Wong, Memorandum Opinion and Order, 11 FCC Rcd 11928, 11930 (1996) (rejecting argument that staff should have
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1065A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1065A1.txt
    • Bureau, (202) 418-1460; TTY: 418-2555. Unless otherwised specified, interested parties may file comments with respect to these notifications within 14 days of the date of this public notice (see Section 1.4(b)(4)). The notifying carrier may respond within 10 days after any such pleadings are filed, and the parties that filed such pleadings may reply within 5 days. See Section 63.52(c), 1.45(c)-(j). It is requested that such comments refer to the notification file number shown above. A copy of the notification is available for public inspection in the Reference Information Center, Court Yard Level, 445 12th Street, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20554. People with Disabilities: To request materials in accessible formats for people with disabilities (braille, large print, electronic files, audio format), send
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1087A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1087A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1087A1.txt
    • parties. In this regard, Bloomberg is mistaken in arguing in its Reply that, because ``[t]he Commission has explicitly directed public comments to address all substantive matters up front,'' this proceeding is ``atypical.'' To the contrary, the Commission's admonition to petitioners and commenters to raise all issues in their initial filings was not ``atypical:'' it reflects the longstanding requirement in Section 1.45(c) of the Commission's Rules that, to allow the target of a petition to deny the opportunity to respond to all allegations against it, a ``reply shall be limited to matters raised in the opposition. . . .'' We find Bloomberg's contention in its Reply that it ``will not have a later opportunity to address the filing information because the Commission
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1380A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1380A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1380A1.txt
    • rate and duration. RFM maintains that the Weed Letter constitutes reasonable assurance of site availability. As a result, Country asks the Commission to disregard the Weed Letter. Discussion. Preliminary Matters. We decline to consider Country's arguments regarding its alleged difficulties in viewing RFM's public inspection file. Country raises this argument for the first time in its Reply. Pursuant to Section 1.45(c) of the Commission's Rules, the scope of argument in a reply pleading ``shall be limited to matters raised in the oppositions.'' Country's argument regarding RFM's public inspection file is therefore procedurally defective and will not be considered. Additionally, Country's claim that we must disregard the Weed Letter because it was not contained in the Application or RFM's public inspection file
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1467A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1467A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1467A1.txt
    • Enforcement Action'' (filed Sept. 30, 2009) (Opposition). NSTN filed a reply. Reply to Opposition to Petition to Dismiss or Deny Application and Request for 308(b) Inquiry Against Mobile Relay Associates and for Enforcement Action (filed October 7, 2009). We will not address herein matters raises in the reply that are beyond those addressed in the opposition. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.45. NSTN then filed a petition to deny the application filed by M2M. Petition to Dismiss or Deny Application and Request for 308(b) Inquiry Against Mobile Relay Associates and for Enforcement Action (filed Feb. 2, 2010); Supplement to Petition to Dismiss or Deny (filed Feb. 4, 2010). This petition incorporates the First Petition by reference. M2M filed an opposition. Opposition to
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1467A1_Rcd.pdf
    • Enforcement Action" (filed Sept. 30, 2009) (Opposition). NSTN filed a reply. Reply to Opposition to Petition to Dismiss or Deny Application and Request for 308(b) Inquiry Against Mobile Relay Associates and for Enforcement Action (filed October 7, 2009). We will not address herein matters raises in the reply that are beyond those addressed in the opposition. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.45. NSTN then filed apetition to deny the application filed by M2M. Petition to Dismiss or Deny Application and Request for 308(b) Inquiry Against Mobile Relay Associates and for Enforcement Action (filed Feb. 2, 2010); Supplement to Petition to Dismiss or Deny (filed Feb. 4, 2010). This petition incorporates the First Petition by reference. M2M filed an opposition. Opposition to "Petition
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1557A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1557A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1557A1.txt
    • Opposition to Application for Review (filed May 12, 2010) (``WTVG Opposition to Review''); WUPW Broadcasting, LLC Opposition to Request for Stay (filed April 26, 2010) (``WTVG Opposition''), WUPW Broadcasting, LLC Opposition to Application for Review (filed May 12, 2010) (``WUPW Opposition to Review''). Buckeye also filed Replies to the Oppositions to the Requests for Stays; pursuant to 47 C.F.R. � 1.45(d), these improper filings are not included in the record of this proceeding and were not considered in resolving the Requests for Stay. Where case-specific questions arise, we consider them independently. Buckeye Opposition to WTVG, Buckeye Opposition to WUPW. WXYZ also initially opposed the WTVG petition, on grounds similar to those of Buckeye, but has not joined Buckeye in its appeal
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-214A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-214A1.pdf
    • (WTB 2009); Atlantic Tele-Network, Inc. and Verizon Wireless Seek FCC Consent to Assign or Transfer Control of Licenses and Authorizations, WT Docket No. 09-199, Public Notice, 24 FCC Rcd 9035 (WTB 2009). Id. Under the Commission's default filing-period rules, oppositions to Verizon Wireless's request were due January 25, 2010, and replies were due February 1, 2010. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.45(b)-(c). No parties opposed Verizon Wireless's request. Verizon Wireless Extension Request Letter at 2 n.4. Generally, the Commission's rules may be waived for good cause shown. 47 C.F.R. � 1.3. The Commission may exercise its discretion to waive a rule where the particular facts make strict compliance inconsistent with the public interest. Northeast Cellular Telephone Co. v. FCC, 897 F.2d 1164,
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2380A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2380A1.txt
    • Bureau, (202) 418-1460; TTY: 418-2555. Unless otherwised specified, interested parties may file comments with respect to these notifications within 14 days of the date of this public notice (see Section 1.4(b)(4)). The notifying carrier may respond within 10 days after any such pleadings are filed, and the parties that filed such pleadings may reply within 5 days. See Section 63.52(c), 1.45(c)-(j). It is requested that such comments refer to the notification file number shown above. A copy of the notification is available for public inspection in the Reference Information Center, Court Yard Level, 445 12th Street, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20554. People with Disabilities: To request materials in accessible formats for people with disabilities (braille, large print, electronic files, audio format), send
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2380A1_Rcd.pdf
    • Bureau, (202) 418-1460; TTY: 418-2555. Unless otherwised specified, interested parties may file comments with respect to these notifications within 14 days of the date of this public notice (see Section 1.4(b)(4)). The notifying carrier may respond within 10 days after any such pleadings are filed, and the parties that filed such pleadings may reply within 5 days. See Section 63.52(c), 1.45(c)-(j). It is requested that such comments refer to the notification file number shown above. A copy of the notification is available for public inspection in the Reference Information Center, Court Yard Level, 445 12th Street, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20554. People with Disabilities: To request materials in accessible formats for people with disabilities (braille, large print, electronic files, audio format), send
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-457A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-457A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-457A1.txt
    • and a Second Protective Order governing the review of highly confidential information so submitted by the Applicants. Applications of Comcast Corporation, General Electric Company and NBC Universal, Inc., Protective Order, DA 10-370 (Med. Bur. Mar. 4, 2010), Applications of Comcast Corporation, General Electric Company and NBC Universal, Inc., Second Protective Order, DA 10-371 (Med. Bur. Mar. 4, 2010). See Section 1.45(c) of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. �1.45(c). PUBLIC NOTICE Federal Communications Commission 445 12th St., S.W. Washington, D.C. 20554 News Media Information 202 / 418-0500 Internet: http://www.fcc.gov TTY: 1-888-835-5322 X Y F � ��PNG r v ��"r�9 I'6� �d�Y�͆aX ���; Wh� �X,�aX���y�]\\.W`h���va6l! �v"]�V�at�������-``````�"m(c)x<��G�<���={-N��J%t�<== �"""x ҍ� � ��(c)���!��'' �R)&� �A�� "���\��v`` � 6� �� 3 � �@ - �
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-576A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-576A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-576A1.txt
    • In taking these actions, we make no finding regarding the degree to which Sprint's inability to vacate channels by prior deadlines is due to factors within or beyond Sprint's control, and defer consideration of such issues to a later date. Finally, we deny Smartcomm's motion to late-file its opposition to the Sprint waiver request and we dismiss its opposition. Section 1.45 of the Commission's rules provides that oppositions to any motion, petition, or request be filed within 10 days of the filing date of the underlying pleading. Sprint filed its waiver request on January 27, 2010, causing oppositions to be due no later than February 8, 2010. Smartcomm's filing was thus untimely by 46 days. In its request for acceptance of
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-628A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-628A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-628A1.txt
    • K Street, NW, Suite 600, Washington, DC 20006; and to Steven Lewis, 995 Fairwood Terrace, NW, Acworth, GA 30101. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Peter H. Doyle, Chief Audio Division Media Bureau On September 23, 2009, Savage and Jireh (collectively, ``Applicants'') jointly filed an Opposition and, on October 19, 2009, Lewis filed a Reply. Applicants' Opposition was late-filed. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.45(b) (``Oppositions to any motion, petition or request may be filed within 10 days after the original pleading is filed.''). Applicants sought additional time to file their Opposition in a motion filed on September 3, 2009, which Lewis opposed on September 11, 2009. We note that Lewis' Reply also could be considered late-filed. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.45(c) (``The person who
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-701A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-701A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-701A1.txt
    • on October 28, 2008. New Testament filed a Motion for Leave and an accompanying Response on November 17, 2008. Fourteen Hundred filed an Opposition and Reply (``Opposition and Reply'') on December 12, 2008. Petition at 1-2. Petition at 3. Opposition at 2. Id. at Declaration of Technical Consultant C. Michael Adkins. Opposition at 3. Motion at 4. 47 C.F.R. � 1.45(c). See, e.g., New Jersey Public Broadcasting Authority, Letter, 24 FCC Rcd 2835, 2838 (MB 2009). See also Living Proof, Inc., Letter, 24 FCC Rcd 2382, 2386 (MB 2009) (declining to consider site availability argument when it was improperly raised for the first time in the Reply). See 47 C.F.R. � 1.45. See, e.g., Colorado RSA 7(B)(2) Ltd. Partnership, Order, 15
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-993A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-993A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-993A1.txt
    • See Implementation of Further Streamlining Measures for Domestic Section 214 Authorizations, Report and Order, 17 FCC Rcd 5517, 5535, para. 34 (2002). 47 C.F.R. � 1.1200(a). Id. � 1.1206. See Commission Emphasizes the Public's Responsibilities in Permit-But-Disclose Proceedings, Public Notice, 15 FCC Rcd 19945 (2000). See 47 C.F.R. � 1.1206(b)(2). Id. � 1.1206(b). See 47 U.S.C. � 309(b). See Section 1.45(c) of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.45(c). See Implementation of Interim Electronic Filing Procedures for Certain Commission Filings, Order, 16 FCC Rcd 21483 (2001); see also Reminder: Filing Locations for Paper Documents and Instructions for Mailing Electronic Media, Public Notice, 18 FCC Rcd 16705 (2003); FCC Announces a New Filing Location for Paper Documents and a New Fax Number
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1474A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1474A1.txt
    • Bureau, (202) 418-1460; TTY: 418-2555. Unless otherwised specified, interested parties may file comments with respect to these notifications within 14 days of the date of this public notice (see Section 1.4(b)(4)). The notifying carrier may respond within 10 days after any such pleadings are filed, and the parties that filed such pleadings may reply within 5 days. See Section 63.52(c), 1.45(c)-(j). It is requested that such comments refer to the notification file number shown above. A copy of the notification is available for public inspection in the Reference Information Center, Court Yard Level, 445 12th Street, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20554. People with Disabilities: To request materials in accessible formats for people with disabilities (braille, large print, electronic files, audio format), send
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1474A1_Rcd.pdf
    • Bureau, (202) 418-1460; TTY: 418-2555. Unless otherwised specified, interested parties may file comments with respect to these notifications within 14 days of the date of this public notice (see Section 1.4(b)(4)). The notifying carrier may respond within 10 days after any such pleadings are filed, and the parties that filed such pleadings may reply within 5 days. See Section 63.52(c), 1.45(c)-(j). It is requested that such comments refer to the notification file number shown above. A copy of the notification is available for public inspection in the Reference Information Center, Court Yard Level, 445 12th Street, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20554. People with Disabilities: To request materials in accessible formats for people with disabilities (braille, large print, electronic files, audio format), send
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1557A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1557A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1557A1.txt
    • Application at 12. Id. at 10. The TerreStar Debtors are TSN DIP, TSO DIP, TerreStar National Services, Inc., TerreStar Network Holdings (Canada) Inc., TerreStar Networks (Canada) Inc., and 0887729 B.B. Ltd. Id. at n.3. TerreStar Consolidated Application at 2. Id. Id. at 2-3. Id. at 3. 47 C.F.R. �� 1.1200 et seq. See 47 U.S.C. � 309(b). See 47 C.F.R. �1.45(c). See 47 C.F.R. �1.45(c). See Implementation of Interim Electronic Filing Procedures for Certain Commission Filings, Order, 16 FCC Rcd 21483 (2001); see also FCC Announces a New Filing Location for Paper Documents and a New Fax Number for General Correspondence, Public Notice, DA 01-2919, 16 FCC Rcd 22165 (2001); Reminder: Filing Locations for Paper Documents and Instructions for Mailing Electronic
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1557A1_Rcd.pdf
    • Under the Commission's procedures for the submission of filings and other documents,29 submissions in this matter may be filed electronically (i.e., though ECFS) or by hand delivery to the Commission's Massachusetts Avenue location. Electronic Filers:30Comments may be filed electronically using the Internet by accessing the ECFS: http://www.fcc.gov/cgb/ecfs/. In completing the transmittal screen, filers should include 26See47 U.S.C. � 309(b). 27See47C.F.R. �1.45(c). 28See47 C.F.R. �1.45(c). 29See Implementation of Interim Electronic Filing Procedures for Certain Commission Filings, Order, 16 FCC Rcd 21483 (2001); see alsoFCC Announces a New Filing Location for Paper Documents and a New Fax Number for General Correspondence, Public Notice, DA 01-2919, 16 FCC Rcd 22165 (2001); Reminder: Filing Locations for Paper Documents and Instructions for Mailing Electronic Media, Public
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1606A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1606A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1606A1.txt
    • must approve a section 652(b) waiver. Application at 16, 19-20. Application at 19-20. See Comcast/CIMCO Notice, 24 FCC Rcd at 14818-19. 47 C.F.R. � 63.03(b). 47 C.F.R. � 63.03(c)(1). This has been designated by Applicants as the lead Wireless Telecommunications Bureau application. 47 C.F.R. �� 1.1200 et seq. See 47 U.S.C. � 309(b). See supra at 5. See 47 C.F.R. �1.45(c). (continued . . .) PUBLIC NOTICE Federal Communications Commission 445 12th St., S.W. Washington, D.C. 20554 News Media Information 202 / 418-0500 Internet: http://www.fcc.gov TTY: 1-888-835-5322 - ��PNG r v ��"r�9 I'6� �d�Y�͆aX ���; Wh� �X,�aX���y�]\\.W`h���va6l! �v"]�V�at�������-``````�"m(c)x<��G�<���={-N��J%t�<== �"""x ҍ� � ��(c)���!��'' �R)&� �A�� "���\��v`` � 6� �� x x �f �L...=�f
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1672A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1672A1.txt
    • Bureau, (202) 418-1460; TTY: 418-2555. Unless otherwised specified, interested parties may file comments with respect to these notifications within 14 days of the date of this public notice (see Section 1.4(b)(4)). The notifying carrier may respond within 10 days after any such pleadings are filed, and the parties that filed such pleadings may reply within 5 days. See Section 63.52(c), 1.45(c)-(j). It is requested that such comments refer to the notification file number shown above. A copy of the notification is available for public inspection in the Reference Information Center, Court Yard Level, 445 12th Street, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20554. People with Disabilities: To request materials in accessible formats for people with disabilities (braille, large print, electronic files, audio format), send
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1672A1_Rcd.pdf
    • Bureau, (202) 418-1460; TTY: 418-2555. Unless otherwised specified, interested parties may file comments with respect to these notifications within 14 days of the date of this public notice (see Section 1.4(b)(4)). The notifying carrier may respond within 10 days after any such pleadings are filed, and the parties that filed such pleadings may reply within 5 days. See Section 63.52(c), 1.45(c)-(j). It is requested that such comments refer to the notification file number shown above. A copy of the notification is available for public inspection in the Reference Information Center, Court Yard Level, 445 12th Street, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20554. People with Disabilities: To request materials in accessible formats for people with disabilities (braille, large print, electronic files, audio format), send
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1688A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1688A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1688A1.txt
    • Apr. 15, 2002. Filed Mar. 15, 2005. Licensee filed an opposition to the Petition to Deny on May 15, 2002, to which Capstar replied on June 11, 2002. Licensee filed an opposition to the Motion to Dismiss on March 25, 2005, to which Capstar replied on March 31, 2005. Capstar's ``Motion to Dismiss'' is an unauthorized filing pursuant to Section 1.45 of the Rules (See, e.g., New Life Broadcasting, Letter, 25 FCC Rcd 7293, 7294 n.3 (MB 2010) (declining to consider unauthorized pleadings pursuant to Section 1.45 of the Rules)). Accordingly, we dismiss it. 47 U.S.C. �� 309(k), 503(b); 47 C.F.R. � 1.80. 47 C.F.R. � 73.3539. 47 U.S.C. � 301. 47 C.F.R. � 73.3539(a). See 47 C.F.R. �� 73.1020, 73.3539(a).
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1789A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1789A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1789A1.txt
    • that were raised for the first time in a reply pleading. Id. at 4487-88. We refused to consider these arguments due to the rule limiting replies to ``matters raised in the oppositions,'' id. at 4488, which is intended to ``allow the target of a petition to deny the opportunity to respond to all allegations against it.'' See 47 C.F.R. � 1.45(c). See also Applications of Comcast Corporation, General Electric Company and NBC Universal, Inc., Order, 25 FCC Rcd 7521, 7524 (MB 2010). Neither that rule nor the policy underlying it are implicated here. Petition, Attach. 1, McClenaghan Declaration at � 3. He goes on to state: ``Indeed, if Living Proof had been contacted by [Nevada-Utah] regarding the use of our tower,
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1851A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1851A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1851A1.txt
    • at n.1. License Objection Reply at 1-2. 47 C.F.R � 1.106; WWIZ, Inc., Memorandum Opinion and Order, 37 FCC 685, 686 (1964), aff'd sub nom., Lorain Journal Co. v. FCC, 351 F.2d 824 (D.C. Cir. 1965), cert. denied, 387 U.S. 967 (1966). See, e.g., WCVO(FM), Gahanna, Ohio, Letter, 20 FCC Rcd 12348, 12349 & n.4 (MB 2005) (47 C.F.R. � 1.45, which governs filing periods for pleadings, covers formal Petitions to Deny and not Informal Objections). See, e.g., Area Christian Television, Inc., Memorandum Opinion and Order, 60 RR 2d 862, 964 (1986) (informal objections, like petitions to deny, must contain adequate and specific factual allegations sufficient to warrant the relief requested); see also Atlanta Newspapers, Inc., 16 FCC 143 (1951) (staff
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1948A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1948A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1948A1.txt
    • or material questions of fact that otherwise warrant reconsideration of the prior action. Furthermore, the Bureau has the authority to dismiss or deny petitions for reconsideration of actions of the full Commission when the arguments plainly do not warrant consideration by the full Commission. Procedural Issues. As an initial matter, we dismiss HSARG's July 8, 2011, Opposition to Reply. Section 1.45 of the Rules allows for the filing of a petition, any oppositions, and a singular reply by the petitioner. Any unauthorized pleadings are subject to dismissal without consideration. Accordingly, we dismiss HSARG's Opposition to Reply without consideration. Additionally, MBMC argues that HSARG's Opposition is procedurally defective and must be stricken or disregarded. MBMC asserts that the Opposition was signed by
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-2038A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-2038A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-2038A1.txt
    • ITC-T/C-20111123-00355, ULS File No. 0004961083 (``Applications''). Applications at 3. Id at 3, and Exhibit 1. Id. Id. See supra Section II.A. Applications at 4. Id. at 5. Id. Id. Intelsat states that they do not anticipate the immediate replacement of any existing member of Intelsat's management. 47 C.F.R. �� 1.1200 et seq. See 47 U.S.C. � 309(b). See 47 C.F.R. �1.45(c). See Id. See Implementation of Interim Electronic Filing Procedures for Certain Commission Filings, Order, 16 FCC Rcd 21483 (2001); see also FCC Announces a New Filing Location for Paper Documents and a New Fax Number for General Correspondence, Public Notice, DA 01-2919, 16 FCC Rcd 22165 (2001); Reminder: Filing Locations for Paper Documents and Instructions for Mailing Electronic Media, Public
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-2038A1_Rcd.pdf
    • to which the filings pertain. To allow the Commission to consider fully all substantive issuesregarding the Applications in as timely and efficient a manner as possible, petitioners and commenters should raise all issues in their initial filings.New issues may not be raised in responses or replies.13A party or 1147 C.F.R. �� 1.1200 et seq. 12See47 U.S.C. � 309(b). 13See47 C.F.R. �1.45(c). 16897 interested person seeking to raisea new issue after the pleading cycle has closed must show good cause why it was not possible for it to have raised the issue previously.Submissions after the pleading cycle has closed that seek to raise new issues based on new facts or newly discovered facts should be filed within 15 days after such facts
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-2057A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-2057A1.txt
    • Bureau, (202) 418-1460; TTY: 418-2555. Unless otherwised specified, interested parties may file comments with respect to these notifications within 14 days of the date of this public notice (see Section 1.4(b)(4)). The notifying carrier may respond within 10 days after any such pleadings are filed, and the parties that filed such pleadings may reply within 5 days. See Section 63.52(c), 1.45(c)-(j). It is requested that such comments refer to the notification file number shown above. A copy of the notification is available for public inspection in the Reference Information Center, Court Yard Level, 445 12th Street, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20554. People with Disabilities: To request materials in accessible formats for people with disabilities (braille, large print, electronic files, audio format), send
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-2057A1_Rcd.pdf
    • Bureau, (202) 418-1460; TTY: 418-2555. Unless otherwised specified, interested parties may file comments with respect to these notifications within 14 days of the date of this public notice (see Section 1.4(b)(4)). The notifying carrier may respond within 10 days after any such pleadings are filed, and the parties that filed such pleadings may reply within 5 days. See Section 63.52(c), 1.45(c)-(j). It is requested that such comments refer to the notification file number shown above. A copy of the notification is available for public inspection in the Reference Information Center, Court Yard Level, 445 12th Street, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20554. People with Disabilities: To request materials in accessible formats for people with disabilities (braille, large print, electronic files, audio format), send
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-284A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-284A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-284A1.txt
    • 328 24.1% 0.9 27.5% 1.2 All Effective Competition Communities All Services 407 93.27 0.97 400 100.0% 0.0 100.0% 0.0 Video service only 395 63.90 0.56 400 35.2% 0.7 37.9% 0.6 Double play package 391 106.73 0.74 400 29.8% 0.4 33.3% 0.5 Triple play package 380 142.49 0.96 400 26.0% 0.5 28.8% 0.5 Second operator subgroup (all) All Services 135 110.32 1.45 128 100.0% 0.0 100.0% 0.0 Video service only 123 66.15 0.58 128 26.0% 0.8 27.2% 0.8 Double play package 122 114.50 1.10 128 27.6% 0.8 29.5% 0.9 Triple play package 120 145.21 1.12 128 39.4% 1.0 43.3% 1.1 Second operator subgroup (incumbents) All Services 70 110.14 1.55 70 100.0% 0.0 100.0% 0.0 Video service only 70 66.57 0.63 70 28.5%
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-441A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-441A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-441A1.txt
    • Wabash Telephone Cooperative in Illinois. Cellular Properties seeks to serve the Bible Grove, Louisville, and Xenia wire centers in the Wabash Telephone rural service area. The average population density for these wire centers is 19.89. The average population density for the remaining wire centers in Wabash Telephone's service area is 13.76. The served-to-unserved density ratio for this proposed redefinition is 1.45. The Commission initiated a proceeding on Cellular Properties' request on July 2, 2009. Wabash Telephone did not file comments. Discussion We conditionally consent to the proposed redefinition of Wabash Telephone's service area. As explained below, the proposed redefinition may pose cream-skimming concerns unless Wabash Telephone disaggregates the high-cost support that it is currently receiving. We find, however, the Illinois Commission
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-585A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-585A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-585A1.txt
    • including some in the regions in which Sprint seeks relief, and that it stands ready to relinquish more spectrum as public safety agencies retune to their new channel assignments. On March 8, 2011, Smartcomm and PSI each filed a reply to the Sprint Reply. Because Smartcomm's and PSI's replies fall outside of the scope of permissible pleadings contemplated by Section 1.45 of the Commission's rules, we have not considered them and are dismissing them as unauthorized pleadings. DISCUSSION In the 2008 Vacated Spectrum Order, the Commission established a process under which Sprint was to clear the Mid-Band in stages. This process was intended to balance the need to reduce the potential for interference and increase the amount of 800 MHz spectrum
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-600A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-600A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-600A1.txt
    • basis for questioning CSC's entitlement to a local entity credit - that CSC, as an entity distinct from Morris Council, has not shown any community involvement. See Roane Reply at 3. We will not, however, address this allegation because it constitutes impermissible ``new matter'' that is not sufficiently related to matters raised in the CSC Opposition. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.45(c) (``[t]he reply shall be limited to matters raised in the opposition''). See also Industrial Business Corp., 26 R.R.2d 1447, 1449 (Rev. Bd. 1973) (``To allow the reply to thus serve the purpose of the original petition would be to . . . effectively render meaningless provisions in the rules for a fair opportunity by another party to respond to allegations
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-681A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-681A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-681A1.txt
    • from BCPI, telephone (202) 488-5300, facsimile (202) 488-5563, TTY (202) 488-5562, e-mail fcc@bcpiweb.com. . For further information, contact Taft Snowdon at (202) 418-2742. For press inquiries, contact Janice Wise at (202) 418-8165. By: Chief, Media Bureau 47 U.S.C. � 310(d). 47 C.F.R. � 1.1200(a). See id. � 1.1206. Id. � 1.1206(b)(2). Id. Id. � 1.1206(b)(1). Id. � 1.1206(b)(2). Id. � 1.45(c). See id. �� 1.46(a) and 73.3584(e). PUBLIC NOTICE Federal Communications Commission 445 12th St., S.W. Washington, D.C. 20554 News Media Information 202 / 418-0500 Internet: http://www.fcc.gov TTY: 1-888-835-5322 � ��PNG r v ��"r�9 I'6� �d�Y�͆aX ���; Wh� �X,�aX���y�]\\.W`h���va6l! �v"]�V�at�������-``````�"m(c)x<��G�<���={-N��J%t�<== �"""x ҍ� � ��(c)���!��'' �R)&� �A�� "���\��v`` � 6� �� @ � �
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-732A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-732A2.txt
    • 25.444 29.224 33.024 0.877 0.868 0.872 1.582 1.617 1.652 7.31 7.527 7.9 236.325 243.953 249.474 76.734 72.682 85.491 9.944 9.457 9.813 0.33 0.25 0.282 24.315 28.99 31.552 0.586 0.589 0.604 1.662 1.605 1.727 2,496.062,470.442,547.18 1.505 1.523 1.573 23.304 23.681 24.228 1.901 1.952 1.959 0.702 0.696 0.7 3.445 2.79 3.131 1.893 1.953 2.021 18.127 18.317 20.015 238.305 261.998 269.53 1.348 1.467 1.45 8,920.6710,408.7911,790.44 3.053 2.373 2.671 270.39 265.398 266.293 34.135 36.102 37.968 4.623 5.603 5.502 1,361.831,420.911,609.49 1.062 1.056 1.04 0.563 0.551 0.548 0.625 0.639 0.637 3.264 3.496 3.529 4.469 4.745 4.991 0.779 0.776 0.776 47.794 49.912 52.729 2.041 2.065 2.096 1.482 1.466 1.479 1.428 1.412 1.416 1.376 1.362 1.625 1.958 1.997 2.146 4.06 4.241 4.422 9.194 9.278 9.262 1.719 1.708 1.683 25.387
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-799A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-799A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-799A1.txt
    • Inc. Have Been Filed and Permit-But-Disclose Ex Parte Procedures Now Apply, WT Docket No. 11-65, Public Notice, DA 11-722 (rel. Apr. 22, 2011). See Commission Emphasizes the Public's Responsibilities in Permit-But-Disclose Proceedings, Public Notice, 15 FCC Rcd 19945 (2000). See 47 C.F.R. � 1.1206(b)(2). Id. � 1.1206(b). See discussion infra Part VI. See 47 U.S.C. � 309(b). See 47 C.F.R. �1.45(c). See FCC Announces Change in Filing Location for Paper Documents, Public Notice, 24 FCC Rcd 14312 (2009). See Electronic Filing of Documents in Rulemaking Proceedings, GC Docket No. 97-113, Report and Order, 13 FCC Rcd 11322 (1998). � � � � � � � � kdJ �����PNG > �!�R>^��S�S߿�"K�k������er4 �J�dM�O�O � �,I TV��5 0�z̪�� ��� %�o� �� � �a�% Tf(c)
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-799A1_Rcd.pdf
    • WT Docket No. 11-65, Widget Corp., Notice of Ex Parte Communication). Copies of the application and any subsequently-filed documents in this matter may be obtained from Best Copy and Printing, Inc. in person at 445 12th Street, S.W., Room CY-B402, Washington, D.C. 20554, via telephone at (202) 488-5300, via facsimile at (202) 488-5563, or via e-mail at 11See 47 C.F.R. �1.45(c). 12SeeFCC Announces Change in Filing Location for Paper Documents, Public Notice, 24 FCC Rcd 14312 (2009). 13See Electronic Filing of Documents in Rulemaking Proceedings, GC Docket No. 97-113, Report and Order, 13 FCC Rcd 11322 (1998). 6427 FCC@BCPIWEB.COM. The application and any associated documents are also available for public inspection and copying during normal reference room hours at the following
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-948A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-948A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-948A1.txt
    • 3796.57 *CPR = Percent DBS penetration rate. ATTACHMENT B CSR 7707-E COMMUNITIES SERVED BY TIME WARNER CABLE INC. Communities CUIDs Franchise Area Households Cable Subscribers Penetration Percentage Clark Township OH2738 663 77 11.61 Delhi Township OH2739 10357 15 0.14 Dodson Township OH2453 929 73 7.86 Fairfield Township (Highland County) OH2451 1204 95 7.89 Green Township (Brown County) OH2436 1213 14 1.45 Green Township (Clinton County) OH2735 963 31 2.56 Hamilton Township OH0945 3524 399 11.32 Harrison Township OH0816 4572 571 12.49 Liberty Township (Butler County) OH2594 7062 786 11.13 Liberty Township (Highland County) OH2455 3997 400 10.01 Liberty Township (Adams County) OH2717 635 56 8.82 Madison Township OH2452 2675 96 3.59 Marion Township OH2721 2075 108 5.20 Meigs Township OH2448 1415
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-186A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-186A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-186A1.txt
    • on January 19, 2011 and a Supplement to Consolidated Opposition to the Petition to Deny and Petition to Issue Letter of Inquiry (``Supplement'') on January 27, 2011. The Bureau granted the Application on January 3, 2011, but rescinded the grant on January 28, 2011, to consider Johnson's Petition. Johnson filed a Reply on March 14, 2011. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.45 (establishing rules governing a pleading cycle consisting only of petitions, oppositions, and replies). 47 C.F.R. � 73.2090. Petition at 2. 47 U.S.C. � 310(d). 47 U.S.C. � 309(d)(1). See id.; Astroline Communications Co. v. FCC, 857 F.2d 1556, 1561 (D.C. Cir. 1988). 47 U.S.C. � 309(d)(2). 47 U.S.C. � 312(g). See Petition, Exhibit A. Johnson fails to explain the inconsistency
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-190A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-190A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-190A1.txt
    • Wireless Telecommunications Bureau, at (202) 418-0609, or Kate Matraves, Spectrum and Competition Policy Division, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau, at (202) 418-7878. -FCC- USCC is a majority-owned (82.8 percent) subsidiary of Telephone and Data Systems, Inc. (``TDS''). 47 U.S.C. � 310(d). 47 C.F.R. � 1.1200(a). 47 C.F.R. � 1.1206. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.1206(b)(1). See id. Id. � 1.1206(b). See 47 C.F.R. �1.45(c). See FCC Announces Change in Filing Location for Paper Documents, Public Notice, 24 FCC Rcd 14312 (2009). � � � $ � � [ [ [ [ �����PNG > �!�R>^��S�S߿�"K�k������er4 �J�dM�O�O � �,I TV��5 0�z̪�� ��� %�o� �� � �a�% Tf(c) U~��Uy�Ӛ�o=�c� {�YAD ���Zv�}�YAD e/�,�-�%E9 ^1�J 2�� bʆPh=f 8H�]}��`��2@ ���'����X�t�p�O � ��$��>��� -�m�``�Q(q P� ���e D �_�� p�/]b|?�O� V��Jõ tXT���e�
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-190A1_Rcd.pdf
    • issues not timely raised may be disregarded by the Commission. Under the Commission's current procedures for the submission of filings and other documents,9 submissions in this matter maybe filed electronically (i.e., though the Commission's Universal Licensing System ("ULS")) or by hand delivery to the Commission. 347 C.F.R. �1.1200(a). 447 C.F.R. �1.1206. 5See 47 C.F.R. �1.1206(b)(1). 6See id. 7Id.�1.1206(b). 8See47 C.F.R. �1.45(c). 9See FCCAnnouncesChangein FilingLocationfor PaperDocuments, Public Notice, 24 FCC Rcd 14312 (2009). 1489 3 Iffiled by ULS, pleadings may be filed via https://wireless2.fcc.gov/UlsEntry/pleadings/pleadingsType.jsp. Iffiled by paper, the original and four copies of each filing must be filed by hand or messenger delivery, by commercial overnight courier, or by first-class or overnight U.S. Postal Service mail. All hand-delivered or messenger-delivered paper filings
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-191A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-191A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-191A1.txt
    • Wireless Telecommunications Bureau, at (202) 418-0609, or Kate Matraves, Spectrum and Competition Policy Division, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau, at (202) 418-7878. -FCC- USCC is a majority-owned (82.8 percent) subsidiary of Telephone and Data Systems, Inc. (``TDS''). 47 U.S.C. � 310(d). 47 C.F.R. � 1.1200(a). 47 C.F.R. � 1.1206. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.1206(b)(1). See id. Id. � 1.1206(b). See 47 C.F.R. �1.45(c). See FCC Announces Change in Filing Location for Paper Documents, Public Notice, 24 FCC Rcd 14312 (2009). $ �����PNG > �!�R>^��S�S߿�"K�k������er4 �J�dM�O�O � �,I TV��5 0�z̪�� ��� %�o� �� � �a�% Tf(c) U~��Uy�Ӛ�o=�c� {�YAD ���Zv�}�YAD e/�,�-�%E9 ^1�J 2�� bʆPh=f 8H�]}��`��2@ ���'����X�t�p�O � ��$��>��� -�m�``�Q(q P� ���e D �_�� p�/]b|?�O� V��Jõ tXT���e� 2)�V``� (c)}�l�tmE...bϡ gs�>o���(R)"q�Q ܆���D N ��- >��r�Kp��-~i�f�M�� z} ����
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-191A1_Rcd.pdf
    • issues not timely raised may be disregarded by the Commission. Under the Commission's current procedures for the submission of filings and other documents,9 submissions in this matter may be filed electronically (i.e., though the Commission's Universal Licensing System ("ULS")) or by hand delivery tothe Commission. 347 C.F.R. �1.1200(a). 447 C.F.R. �1.1206. 5See 47 C.F.R. �1.1206(b)(1). 6See id. 7Id.�1.1206(b). 8See47 C.F.R. �1.45(c). 9See FCCAnnouncesChangein FilingLocationfor PaperDocuments, Public Notice, 24 FCC Rcd 14312 (2009). 1492 3 Iffiled by ULS, pleadings may be filed via https://wireless2.fcc.gov/UlsEntry/pleadings/pleadingsType.jsp. Iffiled by paper, the original and four copies of each filing must be filed by hand or messenger delivery, by commercial overnight courier, or by first-class or overnight U.S. Postal Service mail. All hand-delivered or messenger-delivered paper filings
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-2A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-2A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-2A1.txt
    • that there is a statistically significant, though small, increase in the commercial station's revenue. Other measures of LPFM entry do not indicate the presence of an effect. Table 19 Effect of LPFM Entry on the Revenue per Adult of Full-Service Commercial FM Stations Independent Variable Contour Measure Market Measure Contour/Market Measure Number of LPFM stations -0.041 (1.56) 0.069 (2.46)* 0.046 (1.45) Number of AM stations in market -0.196 (10.67)** -0.191 (10.40)** -0.192 (10.48)** Number of AM stations in contour 0.192 (6.08)** 0.189 (5.99)** 0.189 (6.00)** Number of FM stations in market -0.018 (1.43) -0.020 (1.60) -0.018 (1.46) Number of FM stations in contour -0.110 (5.25)** -0.112 (5.36)** -0.113 (5.39)** Number of commercial TV stations -0.055 (1.80) -0.067 (2.18)* -0.062 (2.04)* Number
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-387A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-387A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-387A1.txt
    • this subpart that are in effect at the time of the reimbursement request''; and (3) the mechanics of how the certification requirement will be implemented. USTelecom et al., Petition at 9-10. See Lifeline Reform Order para. 515. We note that the Commission's rules themselves provide for a default 10 day filing period in certain circumstances. See, e.g., 47 C.F.R. � 1.45(b) (``Oppositions to any motion, petition, or request may be filed within 10 days after the original pleading is filed.''). 47 C.F.R. �� 1.1200 et seq. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.1206(b)(2). 47 C.F.R. � 1.1206(b). Non-Public / For Internal Use Only Draft 06/29/11 PUBLIC NOTICE PUBLIC NOTICE News Media Information 202 / 418-0500 Fax-On-Demand 202 / 418-2830 TTY 202 / 418-2555
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-67A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-67A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-67A1.txt
    • See In the Matter of Applications of Verizon Wireless and Leap Wireless for Commission Consent to the Exchange of 700 MHz Band, AWS-1 and PCS Licenses, DA 11-2096, ULS File Nos. 0004942973, etc., Order (rel. Dec. 30, 2011). See infra and footnote 1. 47 C.F.R. � 1.1206. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.1206(b)(1). See id. Id. � 1.1206(b). See 47 C.F.R. �1.45(c). See FCC Announces Change in Filing Location for Paper Documents, Public Notice, 24 FCC Rcd 14312 (2009). See Electronic Filing of Documents in Rulemaking Proceedings, GC Docket No. 97-113, Report and Order, 13 FCC Rcd 11322 (1998). B C � � � [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ �����PNG > �!�R>^��S�S߿�"K�k������er4 �J�dM�O�O � �,I TV��5 0�z̪�� ��� %�o�
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-67A1_Rcd.pdf
    • a brief description or title identifying the type of document being submitted (e.g., WT Docket No. 12-4, [name of submitting party], Notice of Ex Parte Communication). Copies of the application and any subsequently-filed documents in this matter may be obtained from Best Copy and Printing, Inc., in person at 445 12th Street, S.W., Room CY-B402, Washington, D.C. 17See 47 C.F.R. �1.45(c). 18SeeFCC Announces Change in Filing Location for Paper Documents, Public Notice, 24 FCC Rcd 14312 (2009). 19See Electronic Filing of Documents in Rulemaking Proceedings, GC Docket No. 97-113, Report and Order, 13 FCC Rcd 11322 (1998). 363 20554, via telephone at (202) 488-5300, via facsimile at (202) 488-5563, or via e-mail at FCC@BCPIWEB.COM. The application and any associated documents are
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-69A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-69A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-69A1.txt
    • that the Bureau or the Commission would address issues of consolidation and/or coordinated consideration following a review of the record. Id. at � 7. Cellco Partnership d/b/a Verizon Wireless, SpectrumCo, LLC and Cox TMI Wireless, LLC Seek FCC Consent to the Assignment of AWS-1 Licenses, WT Docket No. 12-4, Public Notice, DA 12-67 (rel. Jan. 19, 2012). See 47 C.F.R. �1.45(c). �����PNG > �!�R>^��S�S߿�"K�k������er4 �J�dM�O�O � �,I TV��5 0�z̪�� ��� %�o� �� � �a�% Tf(c) U~��Uy�Ӛ�o=�c� {�YAD ���Zv�}�YAD e/�,�-�%E9 ^1�J 2�� bʆPh=f 8H�]}��`��2@ ���'����X�t�p�O � ��$��>��� -�m�``�Q(q P� ���e D �_�� p�/]b|?�O� V��Jõ tXT���e� 2)�V``� (c)}�l�tmE...bϡ gs�>o���(R)"q�Q ܆���D N ��- >��r�Kp��-~i�f�M�� z} ���� tm��(c)��cv `��� 0i 0i 0i 0i 0i 0i 0i 0i 0i 0i 0i 0i 0i 0i 0i 0i
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-69A1_Rcd.pdf
    • the Bureau or the Commission would address issues of consolidation and/or coordinated consideration following a review of the record. Id. at � 7. 9 Cellco Partnership d/b/a Verizon Wireless, SpectrumCo, LLC and Cox TMI Wireless, LLC Seek FCC Consent to the Assignment of AWS-1 Licenses, WT Docket No. 12-4, Public Notice, DA 12-67 (rel. Jan. 19, 2012). 10See 47 C.F.R. �1.45(c). 368 For further information, contact Kathy Harris, Mobility Division, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau, at (202) 418-0609, or Kate Matraves, Spectrum and Competition Policy Division, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau, at (202) 418-7878. -FCC- 369
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-734A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-734A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-734A1.txt
    • (202) 418-7443. -FCC- 47 U.S.C. �� 214, 310(d). The spectrum calculations take into account Verizon Wireless's two pending applications to acquire spectrum from SpectrumCo and Leap Wireless International, Inc. in this market. See ULS File Nos. 0004993617 and 0004949598. 47 C.F.R. � 1.1200(a). 47 C.F.R. � 1.1206. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.1206(b)(1). See id. Id. � 1.1206(b). See 47 C.F.R. �1.45(c). See FCC Announces Change in Filing Location for Paper Documents, Public Notice, 24 FCC Rcd 14312 (2009). $ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ �����PNG > �!�R>^��S�S߿�"K�k������er4 �J�dM�O�O � �,I TV��5 0�z̪�� ��� %�o� �� � �a�% Tf(c) U~��Uy�Ӛ�o=�c� {�YAD ���Zv�}�YAD e/�,�-�%E9 ^1�J 2�� bʆPh=f 8H�]}��`��2@ ���'����X�t�p�O � ��$��>��� -�m�``�Q(q P� ���e D �_�� p�/]b|?�O� V��Jõ
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-761A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-761A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-761A1.txt
    • controlled by Cook Inlet Region, Inc., an Alaska Native Corporation. Savary Island A and Savary Island B each are controlled by Ring Island Wireless, LLC. 47 U.S.C. � 310(d). File No. 0005140122 is the lead application for this transaction. 47 C.F.R. � 1.1200(a). 47 C.F.R. � 1.1206. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.1206(b)(1). See id. Id. � 1.1206(b). See 47 C.F.R. �1.45(c). See FCC Announces Change in Filing Location for Paper Documents, Public Notice, 24 FCC Rcd 14312 (2009). $ kd� [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ �����PNG > �!�R>^��S�S߿�"K�k������er4 �J�dM�O�O � �,I TV��5 0�z̪�� ���
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-762A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-762A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-762A1.txt
    • 418-0530 or TTY: (202) 418-0432. For further information, contact Kathy Harris, Mobility Division, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau, at (202) 418-0609, or Kate Matraves, Spectrum and Competition Policy Division, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau, at (202) 418-7878. -FCC- 47 U.S.C. � 310(d). 47 C.F.R. � 1.1200(a). 47 C.F.R. � 1.1206. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.1206(b)(1). See id. Id. � 1.1206(b). See 47 C.F.R. � 1.45(c). See FCC Announces Change in Filing Location for Paper Documents, Public Notice, 24 FCC Rcd 14312 (2009). � � � � � � � $ � � � � \ [ \ [ \ [ \ [ �����PNG > �!�R>^��S�S߿�"K�k������er4 �J�dM�O�O � �,I TV��5 0�z̪�� ��� %�o� �� � �a�% Tf(c) U~��Uy�Ӛ�o=�c� {�YAD ���Zv�}�YAD e/�,�-�%E9 ^1�J 2�� bʆPh=f 8H�]}��`��2@ ���'����X�t�p�O
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-763A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-763A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-763A1.txt
    • 418-0530 or TTY: (202) 418-0432. For further information, contact Kathy Harris, Mobility Division, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau, at (202) 418-0609, or Kate Matraves, Spectrum and Competition Policy Division, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau, at (202) 418-7878. -FCC- 47 U.S.C. � 310(d). 47 C.F.R. � 1.1200(a). 47 C.F.R. � 1.1206. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.1206(b)(1). See id. Id. � 1.1206(b). See 47 C.F.R. � 1.45(c). See FCC Announces Change in Filing Location for Paper Documents, Public Notice, 24 FCC Rcd 14312 (2009). � � � � � � � $ � � � � \ [ \ [ \ [ \ [ �����PNG > �!�R>^��S�S߿�"K�k������er4 �J�dM�O�O � �,I TV��5 0�z̪�� ��� %�o� �� � �a�% Tf(c) U~��Uy�Ӛ�o=�c� {�YAD ���Zv�}�YAD e/�,�-�%E9 ^1�J 2�� bʆPh=f 8H�]}��`��2@ ���'����X�t�p�O
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-764A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-764A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-764A1.txt
    • 418-0530 or TTY: (202) 418-0432. For further information, contact Kathy Harris, Mobility Division, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau, at (202) 418-0609, or Kate Matraves, Spectrum and Competition Policy Division, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau, at (202) 418-7878. -FCC- 47 U.S.C. � 310(d). 47 C.F.R. � 1.1200(a). 47 C.F.R. � 1.1206. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.1206(b)(1). See id. Id. � 1.1206(b). See 47 C.F.R. � 1.45(c). See FCC Announces Change in Filing Location for Paper Documents, Public Notice, 24 FCC Rcd 14312 (2009). v w � - � tm � � $ v w - tm \ [ \ [ \ [ \ [ �����PNG > �!�R>^��S�S߿�"K�k������er4 �J�dM�O�O � �,I TV��5 0�z̪�� ��� %�o� �� � �a�% Tf(c) U~��Uy�Ӛ�o=�c� {�YAD ���Zv�}�YAD e/�,�-�%E9 ^1�J 2�� bʆPh=f 8H�]}��`��2@
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-92A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-92A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-92A1.txt
    • Report and Order and Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, FCC 11-11 (rel. Feb. 2, 2011). The revised rules were published in the Federal Register on May 2, 2011, and went into effect June 1, 2011. See 76 Fed. Reg. 24376 (May 2, 2011). 47 C.F.R. � 1.1206. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.1206(b)(1). See id. Id. � 1.1206(b). See 47 C.F.R. �1.45(c). See FCC Announces Change in Filing Location for Paper Documents, Public Notice, 24 FCC Rcd 14312 (2009). See Electronic Filing of Documents in Rulemaking Proceedings, GC Docket No. 97-113, Report and Order, 13 FCC Rcd 11322 (1998). The revised rules were published in the Federal Register on May 1, 1998, and went into effect June 30, 1998. See 63 Fed.
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-92A1_Rcd.pdf
    • such a showing of good cause, any issues not timely raised may be disregarded by the Commission. Under the Commission's current procedures for the submission of filings and other documents,17 submissions in this matter may be filed electronically (i.e., through ECFS) or by hand delivery to the Commission. 1247 C.F.R. �1.1206. 13See 47 C.F.R. �1.1206(b)(1). 14See id. 15Id.�1.1206(b). 16See47 C.F.R. �1.45(c). 17See FCC Announces Change in Filing Location for Paper Documents, Public Notice, 24 FCC Rcd 14312 (2009). 437 4 Iffiled by ECFS,18comments shall be sent as an electronic file via the Internet to http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/ecfs/. In completing the transmittal screen, commenters should include their full name, U.S. Postal Service mailing address, and the applicable docket number. Parties may also submit an
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-951A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-951A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-951A1.txt
    • 418-0530 or TTY: (202) 418-0432. For further information, contact Kathy Harris, Mobility Division, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau, at (202) 418-0609, or Kate Matraves, Spectrum and Competition Policy Division, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau, at (202) 418-7878. -FCC- 47 U.S.C. � 310(d). 47 C.F.R. � 1.1200(a). 47 C.F.R. � 1.1206. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.1206(b)(1). See id. Id. � 1.1206(b). See 47 C.F.R. � 1.45(c). See FCC Announces Change in Filing Location for Paper Documents, Public Notice, 24 FCC Rcd 14312 (2009). � � � � � � � $ ' ( � � � � \ [ \ [ \ [ \ [ �����PNG > �!�R>^��S�S߿�"K�k������er4 �J�dM�O�O � �,I TV��5 0�z̪�� ��� %�o� �� � �a�% Tf(c) U~��Uy�Ӛ�o=�c� {�YAD ���Zv�}�YAD e/�,�-�%E9 ^1�J 2�� bʆPh=f
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-963A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-963A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-963A1.txt
    • Benefit the Consumers of Air-Ground Telecommunications Services, Report and Order and Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, FCC 04-287, 20 FCC Rcd 4403, 4425-27 �� 41-43 (2005). Id. at 4426 � 42. 47 C.F.R. � 22.861. 47 C.F.R. � 22.863. 47 C.F.R. � 1.1200(a). 47 C.F.R. � 1.1206. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.1206(b)(1). See id. Id. � 1.1206(b). See 47 C.F.R. � 1.45(c). See FCC Announces Change in Filing Location for Paper Documents, Public Notice, 24 FCC Rcd 14312 (2009). = j l m � � � � � �������������� $ j v w � ' ' � � � � � � � � � ] [ ] [ ] [ ] [ �����PNG > �!�R>^��S�S߿�"K�k������er4 �J�dM�O�O � �,I TV��5 0�z̪�� ���
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-974A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-974A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-974A1.txt
    • Linda Ray, Broadband Division, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau, at (202) 418-0257, or Kate Matraves, Spectrum and Competition Policy Division, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau, at (202) 418-7878. -FCC- 47 U.S.C. � 310(d). File No. 0005219145 is the lead application for this transaction. 47 C.F.R. � 1.1200(a). 47 C.F.R. � 1.1206. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.1206(b)(1). See id. Id. � 1.1206(b). See 47 C.F.R. �1.45(c). See FCC Announces Change in Filing Location for Paper Documents, Public Notice, 24 FCC Rcd 14312 (2009). $ � � [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ �����PNG > �!�R>^��S�S߿�"K�k������er4 �J�dM�O�O � �,I TV��5 0�z̪�� ��� %�o� �� � �a�% Tf(c) U~��Uy�Ӛ�o=�c� {�YAD ���Zv�}�YAD e/�,�-�%E9 ^1�J 2��
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-999A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-999A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-999A1.txt
    • a request for waiver of the Universal Licensing System (``ULS'') electronic filing requirement pursuant to Section 1.913(b) of the Commission's rules. 47 C.F.R. � 1.913(b). We grant the Applicants' request for waiver of the ULS electronic filing requirement. 47 C.F.R. � 1.1200(a). 47 C.F.R. � 1.1206. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.1206(b)(1). See id. Id. at � 1.1206(b). See 47 C.F.R. �1.45(c). See FCC Announces Change in Filing Location for Paper Documents, Public Notice, 24 FCC Rcd 14312 (2009). $ �����PNG > �!�R>^��S�S߿�"K�k������er4 �J�dM�O�O � �,I TV��5 0�z̪�� ��� %�o� �� � �a�% Tf(c) U~��Uy�Ӛ�o=�c� {�YAD ���Zv�}�YAD e/�,�-�%E9 ^1�J 2�� bʆPh=f 8H�]}��`��2@ ���'����X�t�p�O � ��$��>��� -�m�``�Q(q P� ���e D �_�� p�/]b|?�O� V��Jõ tXT���e� 2)�V``� (c)}�l�tmE...bϡ gs�>o���(R)"q�Q ܆���D N ��- >��r�Kp��-~i�f�M�� z} ����
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-95-944A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-95-944A1.txt
    • two DBS satellites. Advanced was ultimately assigned to the 110 W.L. orbit location (channels 1-23, 25, 27, 29, 31) and 148 W.L. (channels 1-17, 19, 21, 23, 25, 27, 29, 31)." In February 1990, Advanced applied Several of the pleadings submitted by the panics were not timely filed or were not authorized under the Commission's rules. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.45. Such pleadings shall only be considered as informal requests for Commission action or informal comments. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.41. The parties' requests for extension of time are hereby denied. Satellite Syndicated Systems, Inc., 99 F.C.C. 2d 1369 (1984). Advanced's initial grant authorized it to provide service from two satellites, each to deliver six channels to half of the continental
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-96-1981A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-96-1981A1.txt
    • BSS Plan. 4 Tempo has filed an application to modify this satellite. This request is pending. This Order is without prejudice to any future Commission action on that application. s Directsat's application for a license to cover its DBS operations is granted in a separate order today. fl WTCI filed a Motion for Leave to File. Response, pursuant to Section 1.45(c) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.45(c), stating that good cause exists to grant such a motion in view of EchoStar's and Directsat's submission, in its Joint Reply, of new and contradictory information with respect to EchoStar's TT&C operations. We grant WTCI's motion for good cause shown. 7 The BSS Plan for Region 2 in the 12.2 - 12.7
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-97-355A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-97-355A1.txt
    • whether a specific satellite system might interfere with frequency assignments in accordance with the Region 2 Broadcasting-Satellite Service (BSS)10 Plan and its associated Feeder Link Plan," other satellite systems or terrestrial services.12 " Tempo Application for Minor Modification at pp. 1-2. 7 Id 8 Because the comments were filed after the comment period as set out in 47 C.F.R. � 1.45, they are late-filed. However, we will consider the submissions as informal comments and address the relevant issues raised. " Comments of Hughes Communications Galaxy at p. 2 (filed Sept. 1, 1993). 10 Unless referring specifically to the Region 2 BSS Plan and its associated Feeder Link Plan, in the United States the term DBS is used interchangeably with BSS. "
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-99-419A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-99-419A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-99-419A1.txt
    • the Japan-US Cable Network Application to obtain a submarine cable landing license, In the Matter of AT&T Corp. et al., File No. SCL-LIC-19981117-00025. Comments filed in the proceeding raise issues whether grant of the application as filed would serve the public interest. In order to develop a more complete record, the Bureau issues a supplemental comment schedule pursuant to Section 1.45(c) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.45(c). In response to the Japan-US application, Global Crossing Ltd. has filed a Petition to Defer and additional information asserting in part that ``submarine cables planned, constructed, owned, and operated by [a consortium of] the major carriers serving a particular route pose a serious threat to competition in both the market for submarine
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-104945A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-104945A1.txt
    • record. We have returned to the respective companies data for which confidential treatment was sought. 16030 Federal Communications Commission FCC 97-158 TABLE 1 Ratio of costs of standard analog service to BRI ISDN service Ameritech Bell Atlantic NYNEX Pacific Bell US West Average ratio of costs Outside Plant (loop only) costs 1:1.07 1:1.01 1:0.85 1:1.05 1:0.80 1:0.96* All NTS costs 1:1.45 1:1.36 1:1.23 1:1.13 1:1.07 1:1.24* TABLE 2 Ratio of costs of standard analog service to PRI ISDN service Ameritech Bell Atlantic NYNEX Pacific Bell US West Average ratio of costs Outside Plant (loop only) costs 1:5.68 1:4.13 1:10.94 1:4.67 1:5.33 1:6.5* Outside Plant (loop only) costs (excluding NYNEX data) 1:5.68 1:4.13 excluded 1:4.67 1:5.33 1:4.95* All NTS costs 1:8.9 1:15.80
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-201904A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-201904A1.txt
    • Telecommunications Division, International Bureau, (202) 418-1460; TTY: 418-2555. Interested parties may file comments with respect to this notification within 14 days of the date of this public notice (see Section 1.4(b)(4)). The notifying carrier may respond within 10 days after any such pleadings are filed, and the parties that filed such pleadings may reply within 5 days. See Section 63.52(c), 1.45(c)-(j). It is requested that such comments refer to the notification file number shown above. A copy of the notification is available for public inspection in the Reference Information Center, Court Yard Level, 445 12th Street, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20554. Page 1 of 1
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-201940A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-201940A1.txt
    • Telecommunications Division, International Bureau, (202) 418-1460; TTY: 418-2555. Interested parties may file comments with respect to this notification within 14 days of the date of this public notice (see Section 1.4(b)(4)). The notifying carrier may respond within 10 days after any such pleadings are filed, and the parties that filed such pleadings may reply within 5 days. See Section 63.52(c), 1.45(c)-(j). It is requested that such comments refer to the notification file number shown above. A copy of the notification is available for public inspection in the Reference Information Center, Court Yard Level, 445 12th Street, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20554. Page 1 of 1
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-202192A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-202192A1.txt
    • Telecommunications Division, International Bureau, (202) 418-1460; TTY: 418-2555. Interested parties may file comments with respect to this notification within 14 days of the date of this public notice (see Section 1.4(b)(4)). The notifying carrier may respond within 10 days after any such pleadings are filed, and the parties that filed such pleadings may reply within 5 days. See Section 63.52(c), 1.45(c)-(j). It is requested that such comments refer to the notification file number shown above. A copy of the notification is available for public inspection in the Reference Information Center, Court Yard Level, 445 12th Street, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20554. Page 1 of 1
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-202195A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-202195A1.txt
    • Telecommunications Division, International Bureau, (202) 418-1460; TTY: 418-2555. Interested parties may file comments with respect to this notification within 14 days of the date of this public notice (see Section 1.4(b)(4)). The notifying carrier may respond within 10 days after any such pleadings are filed, and the parties that filed such pleadings may reply within 5 days. See Section 63.52(c), 1.45(c)-(j). It is requested that such comments refer to the notification file number shown above. A copy of the notification is available for public inspection in the Reference Information Center, Court Yard Level, 445 12th Street, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20554. Page 1 of 1
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-202385A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-202385A1.txt
    • Telecommunications Division, International Bureau, (202) 418-1460; TTY: 418-2555. Interested parties may file comments with respect to this notification within 14 days of the date of this public notice (see Section 1.4(b)(4)). The notifying carrier may respond within 10 days after any such pleadings are filed, and the parties that filed such pleadings may reply within 5 days. See Section 63.52(c), 1.45(c)-(j). It is requested that such comments refer to the notification file number shown above. A copy of the notification is available for public inspection in the Reference Information Center, Court Yard Level, 445 12th Street, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20554. Page 1 of 1
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-202500A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-202500A1.txt
    • Telecommunications Division, International Bureau, (202) 418-1460; TTY: 418-2555. Interested parties may file comments with respect to this notification within 14 days of the date of this public notice (see Section 1.4(b)(4)). The notifying carrier may respond within 10 days after any such pleadings are filed, and the parties that filed such pleadings may reply within 5 days. See Section 63.52(c), 1.45(c)-(j). It is requested that such comments refer to the notification file number shown above. A copy of the notification is available for public inspection in the Reference Information Center, Court Yard Level, 445 12th Street, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20554. Page 1 of 1
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-202529A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-202529A1.txt
    • Telecommunications Division, International Bureau, (202) 418-1460; TTY: 418-2555. Interested parties may file comments with respect to this notification within 14 days of the date of this public notice (see Section 1.4(b)(4)). The notifying carrier may respond within 10 days after any such pleadings are filed, and the parties that filed such pleadings may reply within 5 days. See Section 63.52(c), 1.45(c)-(j). It is requested that such comments refer to the notification file number shown above. A copy of the notification is available for public inspection in the Reference Information Center, Court Yard Level, 445 12th Street, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20554. Page 1 of 1
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-204078A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-204078A1.txt
    • Telecommunications Division, International Bureau, (202) 418-1460; TTY: 418-2555. Interested parties may file comments with respect to this notification within 14 days of the date of this public notice (see Section 1.4(b)(4)). The notifying carrier may respond within 10 days after any such pleadings are filed, and the parties that filed such pleadings may reply within 5 days. See Section 63.52(c), 1.45(c)-(j). It is requested that such comments refer to the notification file number shown above. A copy of the notification is available for public inspection in the Reference Information Center, Court Yard Level, 445 12th Street, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20554. Page 1 of 1
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-221039A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-221039A1.txt
    • Bureau, (202) 418-1460; TTY: 418-2555. Unless otherwised specified, interested parties may file comments with respect to this notification within 14 days of the date of this public notice (see Section 1.4(b)(4)). The notifying carrier may respond within 10 days after any such pleadings are filed, and the parties that filed such pleadings may reply within 5 days. See Section 63.52(c), 1.45(c)-(j). It is requested that such comments refer to the notification file number shown above. A copy of the notification is available for public inspection in the Reference Information Center, Court Yard Level, 445 12th Street, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20554. Page 3 of 3 PUBLIC NOTICE FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION 445 12th STREET S.W. WASHINGTON D.C. 20554 News media information 202-418-0500 Fax-On-Demand
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-228830A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-228830A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-228830A1.txt
    • Name: COLUMBUS (WTTE-TV) LICENSEE, INC. Requested Facility: Ch No:36 N Latitude: 39-56-14; W Longitude: 83-1-16 ERP (Average): 2.4 kW; HAAT: 26.6 meters; Antenna: ND Facility ID: 17010 Call Sign: WYOU-DT File No: BDSTA-20021029ABP City: SCRANTON State: PA Grant Date: 11/08/2002 Licensee Name: MISSION BROADCASTING OF WICHITA FALLS, INC. Requested Facility: Ch No:13 N Latitude: 41-10-58; W Longitude: 75-52-26 ERP (Average): 1.45 kW; HAAT: 409 meters; Antenna: ND Facility ID: 21160 Call Sign: KHGI-DT File No: BMDSTA-20021030ACL City: KEARNEY State: NE Grant Date: 11/06/2002 Licensee Name: PAPPAS TELECASTING OF CENTRAL NEBRASKA, A CALIFORNIA LP Requested Facility: Ch No:36 N Latitude: 40-39-28; W Longitude: 98-52-4 ERP (Average): 8.4 kW; HAAT: 179 meters; Antenna: DA Facility ID: 144 Call Sign: KNVA-DT File No: BDSTA-20021030ACM
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-233033A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-233033A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-233033A1.txt
    • ``to start the 90-day review process anew, or to accord such evidence no weight.'' Comments By Interested Third Parties. Pursuant to our procedures governing section 271 applications and sections 1.415 and 1.419 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.415, 1.419, interested parties may file comments on such information. Comments must be filed by April 9, 2003. We waive section 1.45 of the Commission's rules insofar as it permits reply comments. All such filings shall refer to the Commission docket numbers, WC Docket Nos. 03-16. Comments may be filed using the Commission's Electronic Comment Filing System (ECFS) or by filing paper copies. See Electronic Filing of Documents in Rulemaking Proceedings, 63 Fed. Reg. 24121 (1998). Comments filed through the ECFS can
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-245292A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-245292A1.txt
    • Class of Station: Temporary Fixed Earth Station Application for Authority Nature of Service:Domestic Fixed Satellite Service Changes was made on this Lic with letter & condition 9659 - PowDen (-12.55 dBW) on 14000-14500 36M0G7W exceeds Max Digital PowDen of -14 for ROUTINE PROCESSING on SiteID 1, Antenna . To meet ROUTINE PROCESSING level, this power density may be reduced by 1.45 dB; OR a 2-DEGREE SPACING ANALYSIS is required. SITE ID: 1 5331 DERRY AVE., SUITE M AGOURA HILLS, CA 91301, VARIOUS LOCATION: Avl Technology 1 2.4 meters ANTENNA ID: 2400K 76.62 dBW ONE WIDEBAND 36MHZ FM VIDEO CARRIER WITH ASSOCIATED AUDIO & ATIS SUBCARRIERS 14000.0000 - 14500.0000 MHz 36M0F8W 75.17 dBW ONE 36 MBIT MCPC CARRIER FOR VOICE/DATA 14000.0000 -
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-249262A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-249262A1.txt
    • Foreign for all U.S. 4/ Carriers Carriers 6/ Carriers Carriers and Foreign Minutes 1964 20.2 $62.9 $30.3 $32.6 12.0 $19.6 $3.11 $1.50 $1.62 $1.63 $1.62 1965 25.5 78.2 37.2 41.1 15.4 24.7 3.07 1.46 1.61 1.60 1.61 1966 32.3 100.1 47.6 52.5 18.9 30.1 3.10 1.47 1.63 1.59 1.61 1967 39.7 114.2 54.6 59.6 23.4 31.8 2.88 1.38 1.50 1.36 1.45 1968 46.4 126.9 61.5 65.4 28.2 40.0 2.73 1.33 1.41 1.42 1.41 1969 64.6 172.0 82.7 89.4 38.3 51.6 2.66 1.28 1.38 1.35 1.37 1970 81.1 196.6 98.9 97.7 51.0 59.8 2.43 1.22 1.21 1.17 1.19 1971 100.9 237.4 120.7 116.6 68.4 75.1 2.35 1.20 1.16 1.10 1.13 1972 126.5 291.8 148.2 143.6 91.7 98.6 2.31 1.17 1.14 1.08 1.11
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-261024A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-261024A2.txt
    • Foreign for all U.S. 4/ Carriers Carriers 6/ Carriers Carriers and Foreign Minutes 1964 20.2 $62.9 $30.3 $32.6 12.0 $19.6 $3.11 $1.50 $1.62 $1.63 $1.62 1965 25.5 78.2 37.2 41.1 15.4 24.7 3.07 1.46 1.61 1.60 1.61 1966 32.3 100.1 47.6 52.5 18.9 30.1 3.10 1.47 1.63 1.59 1.61 1967 39.7 114.2 54.6 59.6 23.4 31.8 2.88 1.38 1.50 1.36 1.45 1968 46.4 126.9 61.5 65.4 28.2 40.0 2.73 1.33 1.41 1.42 1.41 1969 64.6 172.0 82.7 89.4 38.3 51.6 2.66 1.28 1.38 1.35 1.37 1970 81.1 196.6 98.9 97.7 51.0 59.8 2.43 1.22 1.21 1.17 1.19 1971 100.9 237.4 120.7 116.6 68.4 75.1 2.35 1.20 1.16 1.10 1.13 1972 126.5 291.8 148.2 143.6 91.7 98.6 2.31 1.17 1.14 1.08 1.11
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A1.txt
    • 962 2,311 4,550 7,378 11,928 4.10 Indiana 1,495 2,712 4,207 615 470 1,085 2,111 3,181 5,292 1.82 Iowa 762 1,331 2,092 352 267 619 1,114 1,598 2,711 0.93 Kansas 715 1,232 1,947 345 181 527 1,060 1,413 2,473 0.85 Kentucky 928 1,775 2,703 374 229 604 1,302 2,005 3,307 1.14 Louisiana 1,104 2,344 3,448 458 326 784 1,562 2,670 4,232 1.45 Maine 369 707 1,076 180 104 284 548 811 1,359 0.47 Maryland 1,807 3,030 4,837 795 441 1,236 2,602 3,471 6,073 2.09 Massachusetts 1,947 3,643 5,591 898 494 1,392 2,846 4,137 6,983 2.40 Michigan 2,355 5,185 7,540 940 872 1,811 3,295 6,057 9,352 3.21 Minnesota 1,304 2,391 3,695 612 374 986 1,916 2,766 4,682 1.61 Mississippi 702 1,467 2,169 314
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A3.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A3.txt
    • 962 2,311 4,550 7,378 11,928 4.10 Indiana 1,495 2,712 4,207 615 470 1,085 2,111 3,181 5,292 1.82 Iowa 762 1,331 2,092 352 267 619 1,114 1,598 2,711 0.93 Kansas 715 1,232 1,947 345 181 527 1,060 1,413 2,473 0.85 Kentucky 928 1,775 2,703 374 229 604 1,302 2,005 3,307 1.14 Louisiana 1,104 2,344 3,448 458 326 784 1,562 2,670 4,232 1.45 Maine 369 707 1,076 180 104 284 548 811 1,359 0.47 Maryland 1,807 3,030 4,837 795 441 1,236 2,602 3,471 6,073 2.09 Massachusetts 1,947 3,643 5,591 898 494 1,392 2,846 4,137 6,983 2.40 Michigan 2,355 5,185 7,540 940 872 1,811 3,295 6,057 9,352 3.21 Minnesota 1,304 2,391 3,695 612 374 986 1,916 2,766 4,682 1.61 Mississippi 702 1,467 2,169 314
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A4.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A4.txt
    • 8.25 13.50 13.31 Missouri 6.75 8.25 7.34 0.00 3.50 0.84 0.00 1.75 0.42 6.75 10.00 7.76 6.75 13.50 8.61 Montana 8.24 8.25 8.24 0.00 3.50 3.00 0.00 1.75 1.50 8.24 10.00 9.75 8.24 13.50 12.75 Nebraska 6.51 8.25 7.01 0.00 3.50 3.48 0.00 1.75 1.74 6.51 10.00 8.75 6.51 13.50 12.22 Nevada 5.25 8.25 6.53 0.00 3.50 2.91 0.00 1.75 1.45 5.25 10.00 7.98 5.25 13.50 10.89 New Hampshire 8.20 8.25 8.20 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 8.20 8.25 8.20 8.20 8.25 8.20 New Jersey 7.38 8.06 8.05 0.00 3.46 3.43 0.00 1.73 1.71 7.38 9.79 9.77 7.38 13.25 13.20 New Mexico 7.91 8.25 8.24 0.00 3.50 3.29 0.00 1.75 1.65 7.91 10.00 9.89 7.91 13.50 13.18 New York 6.17
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A5.txt
    • 1.92 -8.17 10.98 34.58 613010 C ACS - NORTHLAND GLACIER STATE 2.15 -1.56 3.77 1.60 613011 C INTERIOR TELEPHONE COMPANY INC. -5.81 -6.96 1.24 -7.19 613011A C INTERIOR TELEPHONE COMPANY INC. -2.92 0.88 -3.77 -12.79 613012 C ACS - ALASKA JUNEAU -0.88 -4.05 3.31 0.00 613013 C KETCHIKAN PUBLIC UTILITIES -0.99 -4.13 3.27 -2.89 613015 C MATANUSKA TELEPHONE ASSOC., INC. 1.45 1.78 -0.33 -3.71 613016 C MUKLUK TEL. COMPANY, INC. 0.97 -4.28 5.48 1.64 613016A C MUKLUK TEL. COMPANY, INC. -1.13 -1.03 -0.10 0.00 613017 C ALASKA TELEPHONE COMPANY 9.52 -2.72 12.59 21.11 613017A C ALASKA TELEPHONE COMPANY -22.74 -2.30 -20.92 -100.00 613018 C NUSHAGAK ELECTRIC & TELEPHONE COOP., INC. 20.83 0.63 20.08 39.52 613019 C OTZ TELEPHONE COOPERATIVE, INC. 3.73
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A9.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A9.txt
    • 49.25 47.55 46.60 47.26 47.15 45.57 45.01 44.92 44.46 43.58 43.70 43.67 43.74 43.95 44.10 42.95 41.16 42.54 42.59 Additional Charge If Drop Line and Connection Block Needed n.a. n.a. 6.04 6.07 6.89 6.89 6.50 7.29 6.74 5.90 5.74 5.65 5.64 5.86 5.84 5.84 5.85 12.13 12.45 Lowest-Cost Inside Wiring Maintenance Plan 0.58 0.85 0.89 1.07 1.07 1.20 1.25 1.31 1.45 1.52 1.78 1.68 2.22 2.66 3.03 3.62 3.62 3.64 3.98 Note: Details may not add to totals due to rounding. n.a.: not available * Revised estimates. **Subject to revision. ***Rate is based upon flat-rate service where available, and measured/message service with 100 five-minute, same-zone business-day calls elsewhere. Beginning in 2001, all rates reflect flat-rate service. ****Beginning in 2002, additional monthly
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-266857A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-266857A1.txt
    • $46.60 $47.26 $47.15 $45.57 $45.01 $44.92 $44.46 $43.58 $43.70 $43.67 $43.74 $43.95 $44.10 $42.95 $41.16 $42.54 $42.71 $42.71 Additional Charge if Drop Line and Connection Block Needed a1 a1 6.04 6.07 6.89 6.89 6.50 7.29 6.74 5.90 5.74 5.65 5.64 5.86 5.84 5.84 5.85 12.13 12.45 12.45 Lowest-Cost Inside Wiring Maintenance Plan 0.58 0.85 0.89 1.07 1.07 1.20 1.25 1.31 1.45 1.52 1.78 1.68 2.22 2.66 3.03 3.62 3.62 3.64 4.08 4.31 1 Revised. 2 Subject to revision. 3 Rates are based upon flat-rate service where available and measured/message service with 100 five-minute, same-zone, business-day calls elsewhere. Beginning in 2001, all rates reflect flat-rate service. 4 Beginning in 2002, rate includes additional monthly charges for touch-tone service. Table 1.2 Average Residential
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-267931A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-267931A1.txt
    • 8M00G7W QPSK 11700.0000 - 12200.0000 MHz 8M00G7W Points of Communication: LEI 1 - ALSAT - (ALSAT) E060377 SES-LIC-20061012-01839E Class of Station: Fixed Earth Stations Application for Authority HEARST-ARGYLE STATIONS, INC. Nature of Service:Domestic Fixed Satellite Service, Fixed Satellite Service 40 � 46 ' 0.19 " N LAT. SITE ID: 1 959 EIGHTH AVENUE, NEW YORK, NY 73 � 59 ' 1.45 " W LONG. LOCATION: ANDREW CORPORATION 1 5.03 meters ANTENNA ID: ES49MPJ-1 70.40 dBW PSK PRIVATE DATA, VIDEO, AUDIO 14000.0000 - 14500.0000 MHz 36M0G7W Page 6 of 15 61.80 dBW PSK PRIVATE DATA, VIDEO, AUDIO 14000.0000 - 14500.0000 MHz 5M00G7W PSK PRIVATE DATA, VIDEO, AUDIO 11700.0000 - 12200.0000 MHz 36M0G7W PSK PRIVATE DATA, VIDEO, AUDIO 11700.0000 - 12200.0000 MHz 5M00G7W
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-268723A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-268723A1.txt
    • Satellite Service The above application license appeared on Accepted Public Notice Report No. SES-00864, dated October 18, 2006 in the incorrect Licensee Name as Hearst-Argyles Stations, Inc. and instead it should have been (Hearst-Argyles Television, Inc.) as shown here. 40 � 46 ' 0.19 " N LAT. SITE ID: 1 959 EIGHTH AVENUE, NEW YORK, NY 73 � 59 ' 1.45 " W LONG. LOCATION: ANDREW CORPORATION 1 5.03 meters ANTENNA ID: ES49MPJ-1 70.40 dBW PSK PRIVATE DATA, VIDEO, AUDIO 14000.0000 - 14500.0000 MHz 36M0G7W 61.80 dBW PSK PRIVATE DATA, VIDEO, AUDIO 14000.0000 - 14500.0000 MHz 5M00G7W PSK PRIVATE DATA, VIDEO, AUDIO 11700.0000 - 12200.0000 MHz 36M0G7W Page 3 of 22 PSK PRIVATE DATA, VIDEO, AUDIO 11700.0000 - 12200.0000 MHz 5M00G7W
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A1.txt
    • 153,565 237 647.96 47,377 0.004 462197 C R PHILLIPS COUNTY TEL 1,302,598 2,016 646.13 400,233 0.036 462198 A R PINE DRIVE TEL CO 431,655 957 451.05 52,563 0.005 462199 C R PLAINS COOP TEL ASSN 1,877,086 1,529 1,227.66 970,419 0.086 462201 C R RICO TEL CO 53,326 188 283.65 0 0.000 462202 C R ROGGEN TEL COOP CO 296,430 296 1,001.45 137,645 0.012 462203 C R RYE TELEPHONE CO 3,660,986 2,525 1,449.89 2,023,405 0.180 462204 C R COLUMBINE ACQ CORP FairPoint Communications, Inc. 1,438,780 1,531 939.76 641,108 0.057 462206 A R STONEHAM COOP TEL CO 46,791 78 599.89 12,780 0.001 462207 C R STRASBURG TEL CO Telephone And Data Systems, Inc. 1,084,488 1,954 555.01 254,388 0.023 462208 C R CENTURYTEL-COLORADO CenturyTel,
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A1.txt
    • -2.37 8.10 19.18 381616 C INTER-COMMUNITY TELEPHONE COMPANY 12.36 -6.23 19.83 42.22 381617 C MIDSTATE TELEPHONE COMPANY 12.04 -0.59 12.71 22.72 381622 A MOORE & LIBERTY TELEPHONE COMPANY 8.29 0.61 7.63 19.84 381623 A NOONAN FARMERS TELEPHONE COMPANY 15.56 6.06 8.96 27.54 381625 A NORTHWEST COMMUNICATIONS COOPERATIVE 7.30 -1.49 8.92 20.28 381630 C POLAR COMMUNICATIONS MUTUAL AID CORP -3.73 -2.30 -1.45 0.00 381631 A RED RIVER RURAL TEL. ASSN. 17.75 10.27 6.78 25.79 381631A A RED RIVER RURAL TEL. ASSN. 8.57 -0.29 8.89 21.25 381632 C RESERVATION TELEPHONE COOPERATIVE 1.30 -7.27 9.24 9.88 381632A C RESERVATION TELEPHONE COOPERATIVE 35.21 0.06 35.13 140.86 381636 C UNITED TELEPHONE MUTUAL AID CORP. -1.30 -0.94 -0.36 -28.00 381637 C WEST RIVER TELECOMMUNICATIONS COOPERATIVE -11.12 -3.70
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A5.txt
    • 153,565 237 647.96 47,377 0.004 462197 C R PHILLIPS COUNTY TEL 1,302,598 2,016 646.13 400,233 0.036 462198 A R PINE DRIVE TEL CO 431,655 957 451.05 52,563 0.005 462199 C R PLAINS COOP TEL ASSN 1,877,086 1,529 1,227.66 970,419 0.086 462201 C R RICO TEL CO 53,326 188 283.65 0 0.000 462202 C R ROGGEN TEL COOP CO 296,430 296 1,001.45 137,645 0.012 462203 C R RYE TELEPHONE CO 3,660,986 2,525 1,449.89 2,023,405 0.180 462204 C R COLUMBINE ACQ CORP FairPoint Communications, Inc. 1,438,780 1,531 939.76 641,108 0.057 462206 A R STONEHAM COOP TEL CO 46,791 78 599.89 12,780 0.001 462207 C R STRASBURG TEL CO Telephone And Data Systems, Inc. 1,084,488 1,954 555.01 254,388 0.023 462208 C R CENTURYTEL-COLORADO CenturyTel,
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A5.txt
    • -2.37 8.10 19.18 381616 C INTER-COMMUNITY TELEPHONE COMPANY 12.36 -6.23 19.83 42.22 381617 C MIDSTATE TELEPHONE COMPANY 12.04 -0.59 12.71 22.72 381622 A MOORE & LIBERTY TELEPHONE COMPANY 8.29 0.61 7.63 19.84 381623 A NOONAN FARMERS TELEPHONE COMPANY 15.56 6.06 8.96 27.54 381625 A NORTHWEST COMMUNICATIONS COOPERATIVE 7.30 -1.49 8.92 20.28 381630 C POLAR COMMUNICATIONS MUTUAL AID CORP -3.73 -2.30 -1.45 0.00 381631 A RED RIVER RURAL TEL. ASSN. 17.75 10.27 6.78 25.79 381631A A RED RIVER RURAL TEL. ASSN. 8.57 -0.29 8.89 21.25 381632 C RESERVATION TELEPHONE COOPERATIVE 1.30 -7.27 9.24 9.88 381632A C RESERVATION TELEPHONE COOPERATIVE 35.21 0.06 35.13 140.86 381636 C UNITED TELEPHONE MUTUAL AID CORP. -1.30 -0.94 -0.36 -28.00 381637 C WEST RIVER TELECOMMUNICATIONS COOPERATIVE -11.12 -3.70
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A9.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A9.txt
    • 46.60 47.26 47.15 45.57 45.01 44.92 44.46 43.58 43.70 43.67 43.74 43.95 44.10 42.95 41.16 42.54 42.71 42.71 Additional Charge If Drop Line and Connection Block Needed n.a. n.a. 6.04 6.07 6.89 6.89 6.50 7.29 6.74 5.90 5.74 5.65 5.64 5.86 5.84 5.84 5.85 12.13 12.45 12.45 Lowest-Cost Inside Wiring Maintenance Plan 0.58 0.85 0.89 1.07 1.07 1.20 1.25 1.31 1.45 1.52 1.78 1.68 2.22 2.66 3.03 3.62 3.62 3.64 4.08 4.31 Note: Details may not add to totals due to rounding. n.a.: not available * Revised estimates. **Subject to revision. ***Rate is based upon flat-rate service where available, and measured/message service with 100 five-minute, same-zone business-day calls elsewhere. Beginning in 2001, all rates reflect flat-rate service. ****Beginning in 2002, additional
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-275668A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-275668A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-275668A1.txt
    • Outdoors Garage Townhouse A, ground floor -- Mount Wood/fiberglass mast Wood/fiberglass mast Wood tripod -- Floor Asphalt driveway Concrete slab Carpeted concrete slab -- Height (center of antenna) 0.97 m and 1.47 m 0.97 m and 1.47 m for 2-m distance 0.97 m and 2.39 m for 10-m distance 0.88 m and 1.26 m at 2-m distance 0.88 m and 1.45 m at 10-m distance TV: -- Location Outdoors Outdoors Townhouse B, ground floor -- Mount 0.85-m tall plastic cart 0.85-m tall plastic cart 0.85-m tall plastic cart -- Floor Asphalt driveway Asphalt driveway extension at 2-m distance Grass at 10-m distance Carpeted concrete slab -- Aspect Angle Front, rear, right side, right-rear (~45 deg.) Front and rear Rear # of
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A1.txt
    • 1,886 3,185 1.07 Oregon 980 1,600 2,580 432 280 712 1,412 1,879 3,292 1.10 Pennsylvania 3,396 6,128 9,524 1,483 1,158 2,641 4,879 7,286 12,166 4.08 Puerto Rico 699 1,396 2,095 255 187 442 954 1,583 2,537 0.85 Rhode Island 264 517 782 104 77 181 369 594 963 0.32 South Carolina 1,175 2,228 3,403 505 399 904 1,680 2,627 4,306 1.45 South Dakota 201 345 546 89 77 166 290 422 712 0.24 Tennessee 1,578 3,050 4,628 653 458 1,110 2,230 3,508 5,738 1.93 Texas 5,385 12,060 17,445 2,376 2,342 4,718 7,760 14,402 22,162 7.44 Utah 608 1,013 1,621 269 172 440 877 1,185 2,062 0.69 Vermont 211 306 517 95 50 146 306 357 663 0.22 Virgin Islands 94 68
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A13.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A13.txt
    • 21.97 Iowa Telecommunications Services - Iowa System IA 14,782 12,042 2,740 18.54 Qwest - Iowa IA 150,409 72,120 78,267 52.04 AT&T - Southwestern Bell - Kansas KS 100,901 32,115 66,766 66.17 Windstream Kentucky East - London KY 16,195 8,151 8,023 49.54 Windstream Kentucky East - Lexington KY 61,389 16,766 40,578 66.10 Cincinnati Bell Telephone - Kentucky KY 25,970 25,618 377 1.45 AT&T - BellSouth - Kentucky KY 115,878 75,836 40,011 34.53 AT&T - BellSouth - Louisiana LA 138,122 91,973 46,128 33.40 Verizon New England - Maine ME 43,511 10,084 33,432 76.84 Verizon Maryland MD 205,948 32,388 173,521 84.25 Verizon New England - Massachusetts MA (29,867) (107,953) 78,123 (261.57) Verizon North - Michigan MI 81,634 49,351 32,257 39.51 AT&T - Ameritech -
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A3.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A3.txt
    • 1,886 3,185 1.07 Oregon 980 1,600 2,580 432 280 712 1,412 1,879 3,292 1.10 Pennsylvania 3,396 6,128 9,524 1,483 1,158 2,641 4,879 7,286 12,166 4.08 Puerto Rico 699 1,396 2,095 255 187 442 954 1,583 2,537 0.85 Rhode Island 264 517 782 104 77 181 369 594 963 0.32 South Carolina 1,175 2,228 3,403 505 399 904 1,680 2,627 4,306 1.45 South Dakota 201 345 546 89 77 166 290 422 712 0.24 Tennessee 1,578 3,050 4,628 653 458 1,110 2,230 3,508 5,738 1.93 Texas 5,385 12,060 17,445 2,376 2,342 4,718 7,760 14,402 22,162 7.44 Utah 608 1,013 1,621 269 172 440 877 1,185 2,062 0.69 Vermont 211 306 517 95 50 146 306 357 663 0.22 Virgin Islands 94 68
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A5.txt
    • 29, 2006) 3 - 162 Table 3.32 ILEC High-Cost Loop Support Data Percentage Changes from 2003 to 2004 by Study Area Study Area Code Type Study Area Name TOTAL ALABAMA 0.71 -3.53 4.40 -9.22 250282 C BLOUNTSVILLE TEL. CO., INC. 0.66 -2.99 3.77 1.31 250283 A BRINDLEE MOUNTAIN TEL. CO. -1.62 -3.22 1.65 0.00 250284 C BUTLER TEL. CO., INC. -1.45 -0.53 -0.92 -12.80 250285 A CASTLEBERRY TEL. CO., INC. 5.53 1.15 4.33 11.13 250286 C NATIONAL TEL. CO. OF AL 3.96 -5.20 9.67 10.67 250290 C FARMERS TELECOMMUNICATIONS COOPERATIVE, INC. 7.36 -3.14 10.84 36.65 250295 C GRACEBA TOTAL COMM. -2.54 -2.48 -0.07 -7.70 250298 C GULF TEL. CO.-AL 5.21 4.43 0.75 -20.55 250299 C HAYNEVILLE TEL. CO., INC. -22.71 -2.63
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A9.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A9.txt
    • 47.15 45.57 45.01 44.92 44.46 43.58 43.70 43.67 43.74 43.95 44.10 42.95 41.16 42.54 42.71 42.80 42.92 Additional Charge If Drop Line and Connection Block Needed n.a. n.a. 6.04 6.07 6.89 6.89 6.50 7.29 6.74 5.90 5.74 5.65 5.64 5.86 5.84 5.84 5.85 12.13 12.45 12.65 13.91 Lowest-Cost Inside Wiring Maintenance Plan 0.58 0.85 0.89 1.07 1.07 1.20 1.25 1.31 1.45 1.52 1.78 1.68 2.22 2.66 3.03 3.62 3.62 3.64 4.08 4.42 4.86 Note: Details may not add to totals due to rounding. n.a.: not available * Revised estimates. **Subject to revision. ***Rate is based upon flat-rate service where available, and measured/message service with 100 five-minute, same-zone business-day calls elsewhere. Beginning in 2001, all rates reflect flat-rate service. ****Beginning in 2002,
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-284932A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-284932A1.txt
    • 1,886 3,185 1.07 Oregon 980 1,600 2,580 432 280 712 1,412 1,879 3,292 1.10 Pennsylvania 3,396 6,128 9,524 1,483 1,158 2,641 4,879 7,286 12,166 4.08 Puerto Rico 699 1,396 2,095 255 187 442 954 1,583 2,537 0.85 Rhode Island 264 517 782 104 77 181 369 594 963 0.32 South Carolina 1,175 2,228 3,403 505 399 904 1,680 2,627 4,306 1.45 South Dakota 201 345 546 89 77 166 290 422 712 0.24 Tennessee 1,578 3,050 4,628 653 458 1,110 2,230 3,508 5,738 1.93 Texas 5,385 12,060 17,445 2,376 2,342 4,718 7,760 14,402 22,162 7.44 Utah 608 1,013 1,621 269 172 440 877 1,185 2,062 0.69 Vermont 211 306 517 95 50 146 306 357 663 0.22 Virgin Islands 94 68
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-284934A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-284934A1.txt
    • 2.38 2.57 2.53 2.81 1.33 3.32 3.44 3.17 3.45 3.41 Total Connection Charge $49.25$47.55$46.60$47.26$47.15$45.57$45.01$44.92$44.46$43.58$43.70$43.67$43.74$43.95$44.10$42.95$41.16$42.54$42.71$42.80 $43.13 $43.22 Additional Charge if Drop Line and Connection Block Needed a1 a1 6.04 6.07 6.89 6.89 6.50 7.29 6.74 5.90 5.74 5.65 5.64 5.86 5.84 5.84 5.85 12.13 12.45 12.65 13.91 12.65 Lowest-Cost Inside Wiring Maintenance Plan 0.58 0.85 0.89 1.07 1.07 1.20 1.25 1.31 1.45 1.52 1.78 1.68 2.22 2.66 3.03 3.62 3.62 3.64 4.08 4.42 4.96 5.38 1 Revised. 2 Subject to revision. 3 Rates are based upon flat-rate service where available and measured/message service with 100 five-minute, same-zone, business-day calls elsewhere. Beginning in 2001, all rates reflect flat-rate service. 4 Beginning in 2002, rate includes additional monthly charges for touch-tone service. Table 1.2
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287688A1.pdf
    • 3,986 314 Georgia 2,102 3.76 1,868 4 2,219 175 Guam NA NA NA NA NA NA Hawaii 200 0.36 177 0 211 17 Idaho 242 0.43 215 0 256 20 Illinois 2,180 3.90 1,937 4 2,301 181 Indiana 1,087 1.94 966 2 1,147 90 Iowa 499 0.89 443 1 527 41 Kansas 484 0.87 430 1 511 40 Kentucky 812 1.45 721 1 857 67 Louisiana 955 1.71 849 2 1,008 79 Maine 300 0.54 266 1 317 25 Maryland 1,138 2.04 1,012 2 1,202 95 Massachusetts 1,173 2.10 1,043 2 1,239 98 Michigan 1,612 2.88 1,432 3 1,701 134 Minnesota 820 1.47 728 2 865 68 Mississippi 724 1.30 643 1 764 60 Missouri 1,117 2.00 992 2 1,179 93
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287688A3.pdf
    • 3,986 314 Georgia 2,102 3.76 1,868 4 2,219 175 Guam NA NA NA NA NA NA Hawaii 200 0.36 177 0 211 17 Idaho 242 0.43 215 0 256 20 Illinois 2,180 3.90 1,937 4 2,301 181 Indiana 1,087 1.94 966 2 1,147 90 Iowa 499 0.89 443 1 527 41 Kansas 484 0.87 430 1 511 40 Kentucky 812 1.45 721 1 857 67 Louisiana 955 1.71 849 2 1,008 79 Maine 300 0.54 266 1 317 25 Maryland 1,138 2.04 1,012 2 1,202 95 Massachusetts 1,173 2.10 1,043 2 1,239 98 Michigan 1,612 2.88 1,432 3 1,701 134 Minnesota 820 1.47 728 2 865 68 Mississippi 724 1.30 643 1 764 60 Missouri 1,117 2.00 992 2 1,179 93
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287688A5.pdf
    • -12.32 0.00 401691 C WINDSTREAM ARKANSAS, INC. 11.47 -3.88 15.97 INFINITE 401692 C ARKANSAS TELEPHONE COMPANY 4.18 -2.32 6.65 0.00 401697 C CENTRAL ARKANSAS TEL. COOP INC. 0.79 -3.48 4.42 2.68 401698 C CLEVELAND CTY TEL. CO. -0.69 -5.56 5.16 5.14 401699 C DECATUR TELEPHONE CO INC- ARKANSAS 5.63 0.74 4.86 20.28 401702 C SOUTH ARKANSAS TEL. CO.,INC. -4.79 -3.39 -1.45 -8.45 401704 C LAVACA TELEPHONE-AR 65.41 -6.51 76.94 129.74 401705 C CENTURYTEL OF ARKANSAS, INC. -4.76 -3.58 -1.21 -8.36 401709 C MADISON COUNTY TEL. CO. INC. 7.37 -0.87 8.31 32.85 401710 A MAGAZINE TELEPHONE COMPANY 0.75 -2.02 2.83 0.37 401711 C CENTURYTEL OF MOUNTAIN HOME, INC. -2.67 -3.55 0.92 -6.10 401712 A MOUNTAIN VIEW TELEPHONE COMPANY -0.25 -0.51 0.26 -16.71
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287688A9.pdf
    • $45.01 $44.92 $44.46 $43.58 $43.70 $43.67 $43.74 $43.95 $44.10 $42.95 $41.16 $42.54 $42.71 $42.80 $43.13 $43.22 Additional Charge if Drop Line and Connection Block Needed a1 a1 6.04 6.07 6.89 6.89 6.50 7.29 6.74 5.90 5.74 5.65 5.64 5.86 5.84 5.84 5.85 12.13 12.45 12.65 13.91 12.65 Lowest-Cost Inside Wiring Maintenance Plan 0.58 0.85 0.89 1.07 1.07 1.20 1.25 1.31 1.45 1.52 1.78 1.68 2.22 2.66 3.03 3.62 3.62 3.64 4.08 4.42 4.96 5.38 1 Revised. 2 Subject to revision. 3 Rates are based upon flat-rate service where available and measured/message service with 100 five-minute, same-zone, business-day calls elsewhere. Beginning in 2001, all rates reflect flat-rate service. 4 Beginning in 2002, rate includes additional monthly charges for touch-tone service. Table 7.6
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A1.txt
    • to ARMIS (Report 43-01) is based on USF loops. USF Loops 1/ Year End 1 - 48 Table 1.18 Information for Allocating Incumbent Local Exchange Revenues: 2007 (Dollars in Millions) Revenues Interstate for Total Allocation Revenues Alabama $900 1.87% $890 $2 $1,041 $89 Alaska NA NA NA NA NA NA American Samoa NA NA NA NA NA NA Arizona 701 1.45 693 1 810 69 Arkansas 483 1.00 478 1 559 48 California 5,335 11.06 5,277 10 6,170 526 Colorado 858 1.78 849 2 993 85 Connecticut 671 1.39 663 1 776 66 Delaware 150 0.31 149 0 174 15 District of Columbia 290 0.60 287 1 335 29 Florida 3,289 6.82 3,254 6 3,804 324 Georgia 1,762 3.65 1,743 3
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A3.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A3.txt
    • to ARMIS (Report 43-01) is based on USF loops. USF Loops 1/ Year End 1 - 48 Table 1.18 Information for Allocating Incumbent Local Exchange Revenues: 2007 (Dollars in Millions) Revenues Interstate for Total Allocation Revenues Alabama $900 1.87% $890 $2 $1,041 $89 Alaska NA NA NA NA NA NA American Samoa NA NA NA NA NA NA Arizona 701 1.45 693 1 810 69 Arkansas 483 1.00 478 1 559 48 California 5,335 11.06 5,277 10 6,170 526 Colorado 858 1.78 849 2 993 85 Connecticut 671 1.39 663 1 776 66 Delaware 150 0.31 149 0 174 15 District of Columbia 290 0.60 287 1 335 29 Florida 3,289 6.82 3,254 6 3,804 324 Georgia 1,762 3.65 1,743 3
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A5.txt
    • 2007 by Study Area Study Area Code Type Study Area Name Unseparated High Cost Loop Unseparated Number NTS Revenue Support Payment NTS Revenue of Requirement Projections in Requirement Loops per Loop Later Year* ARIZONA (CONT.) 454426 C CITIZENS TEL CO-WHITE MT DBA FRONTIER COMM 3.53 -3.68 7.49 11.11 454449 C NAVAJO COMM CO INC DBA FRONTIER NAVAJO COM-AZ -0.87 0.59 -1.45 -25.92 455101 C QWEST CORPORATION - AZ 3.44 -8.23 12.72 0.00 457991 C SADDLEBACK COMMUNICATIONS COMPANY 32.43 27.85 3.59 31.98 457991A C SADDLEBACK COMMUNICATIONS COMPANY 26.05 0.00 26.05 INFINITE ARKANSAS TOTAL 3.48 -6.67 10.88 20.09 401142 C CENTURYTEL OF NW ARKANSAS, LLC - RUSSELLVILLE 0.27 -7.46 8.35 13.15 401143 C CENTURYTEL OF NW ARKANSAS, LLC-SILOAM SPRINGS -0.54 -8.37 8.55 14.05
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303886A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303886A1.txt
    • 4.87 VIRGIN ISLANDS 5.98 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 13.26 0.00 0.00 19.24 VIRGINIA 0.05 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.15 0.91 0.06 1.18 WASHINGTON 0.50 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.65 0.51 0.13 1.79 WEST VIRGINIA 0.20 0.01 0.00 1.61 0.00 0.17 1.47 0.19 3.64 WISCONSIN 0.71 0.06 (0.00) 0.00 0.00 1.62 0.00 0.41 2.80 WYOMING 3.49 0.04 0.00 2.80 0.00 3.22 1.45 1.05 12.06 INDUSTRY $0.69 $0.03 $0.00 $0.16 $0.00 $0.76 $0.30 $0.18 $2.12 Based on 2009 support payments and reported loops or lines from USAC filing for the Fourth Quarter 2009. Support Term Total High Cost Support Support Access Switching High Cost Support Interstate Interstate Support Notes: Details may not appear to add to totals due to rounding. Common Line Valve
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303886A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303886A5.txt
    • 4.87 VIRGIN ISLANDS 5.98 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 13.26 0.00 0.00 19.24 VIRGINIA 0.05 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.15 0.91 0.06 1.18 WASHINGTON 0.50 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.65 0.51 0.13 1.79 WEST VIRGINIA 0.20 0.01 0.00 1.61 0.00 0.17 1.47 0.19 3.64 WISCONSIN 0.71 0.06 (0.00) 0.00 0.00 1.62 0.00 0.41 2.80 WYOMING 3.49 0.04 0.00 2.80 0.00 3.22 1.45 1.05 12.06 INDUSTRY $0.69 $0.03 $0.00 $0.16 $0.00 $0.76 $0.30 $0.18 $2.12 Based on 2009 support payments and reported loops or lines from USAC filing for the Fourth Quarter 2009. Support Term Total High Cost Support Support Access Switching High Cost Support Interstate Interstate Support Notes: Details may not appear to add to totals due to rounding. Common Line Valve
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-190A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-190A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-190A1.txt
    • 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 154(i) and 155(c)(5), and section 1.115 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.115, the Application for Review filed by High Plains Wireless, L.P. on May 6, 1998, 1998, IS DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to section 4(i) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. � 154(i), and section 1.45(c) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.45(c), the Reply to Opposition to Application for Review filed by High Plains Wireless, L.P. on January 6, 1998, IS DISMISSED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to section 4(i) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. � 154(i), and section 1.45(c) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.45(c),
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-408A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-408A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-408A1.txt
    • relief from the Commission under Section 332(c)(7)(B)(v) shall file a request for declaratory ruling pursuant to Section 1.2 of the Commission's rules. In addition, we conclude that such petitions shall be subject to the Commission's procedures applicable to petitions for declaratory ruling, with the exception of the pleading cycle guidelines and service rules set forth in the following paragraphs. Section 1.45(b) of our rules, which generally governs oppositions to petitions for declaratory ruling, provides that "[o]ppositions to any motion, petition, or request may be filed within 10 days after the original pleading is filed.'' Several commenters argue that 10 days is too short a period for State and local governments to respond to petitions filed pursuant to Section 332(c)(7)(B)(v), and believe
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-208A2.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-208A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-208A2.txt
    • Days 2.47 0.14 3.63 0.27 2.85 0.55 10.22 7.78 PR-8-01 Open Orders in a Hold Status > 30 Days 0.55 0.65 0.36 0.97 0.27 0.00 0.00 0.00 4b,1n,2n PR-8-02 Open Orders in a Hold Status > 90 Days 0.03 0.00 0.04 0.00 0.04 0.00 0.00 0.00 4b Resale: Maintenance and Repair Resale POTS MR-2-02 Network Trouble Report Rate - Loop 1.45 0.70 1.24 0.68 1.50 0.83 1.45 0.71 MR-2-03 Network Trouble Report Rate - Central Office 0.21 0.18 0.21 0.17 0.20 0.18 0.19 0.15 MR-3-01 % Missed Repair Appointment - Loop Bus. 13.10 8.62 13.36 8.47 13.46 7.60 12.92 8.55 MR-3-01 % Missed Repair Appointment - Loop Res. 9.21 7.93 8.85 7.13 8.00 4.78 8.82 8.41 MR-3-02 % Missed Repair Appointment
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-208A3.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-208A3.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-208A3.txt
    • the data over time. AGGREGATE METRICS DISAGGREGATED METRICS Metric January February March April Number Metric Name VZ CLEC VZ CLEC VZ CLEC VZ CLEC Notes Preorder and OSS Interface Availability OSS Response Times PO-1-01 Customer Service Record - EDI 2.75 2.42 2.76 2.26 2.69 2.71 2.70 NA PO-1-01 Customer Service Record - CORBA 2.75 1.19 2.76 0.89 2.69 0.97 2.70 1.45 PO-1-01 Customer Service Record - Web GUI 2.75 5.59 2.76 3.29 2.69 NA 2.70 3.21 PO-1-02 Due Date Availability - EDI 0.12 3.67 0.14 NA 0.12 NA 0.13 NA PO-1-02 Due Date Availability - CORBA 0.12 1.97 0.14 NA 0.12 NA 0.13 NA PO-1-02 Due Date Availability - Web GUI 0.12 5.39 0.14 2.17 0.12 1.15 0.13 1.50 4a PO-1-03
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-29A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-29A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-29A1.txt
    • competing carriers in Oklahoma minimizes service disruptions that may deny an efficient competitor with a meaningful opportunity to compete. We conclude that SWBT demonstrates that competing carrier end users experience only very low rates of installation troubles on lines provisioned by CHCs. From June through August 2000, competing carriers experienced troubles within 7 days after installation on an average of 1.45 percent of CHCs in Kansas and 2.34 percent of CHCs in Oklahoma. Although the Oklahoma trouble report data are slightly higher than that which we found to comply with checklist item 4 in Texas, there were only three reported instances of trouble in Oklahoma, and no commenter has complained about SWBT's Oklahoma CHC performance from July 2000 through October 2000.
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-316A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-316A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-316A1.txt
    • Teen Hospital Shuttle, Memorandum Opinion and Order, 16 FCC Rcd 8153 (2001) (SLTHS). Supplement at 5. SLTHS, 16 FCC Rcd at 8154 � 2. Id. at 8155 � 5. Supplement at 3. Second Order on Reconsideration, 15 FCC Rcd at 24934 � 5. Supplement at 3. We will not address CSAA's related argument in its supplement regarding 47 C.F.R. � 1.45, see Supplement at 3-4, because CSAA has not explained why this argument could not have been raised earlier. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.115(c), (d). Application for Review at 8. See 47 C.F.R. � 90.173(a), (b). (continued....) Federal Communications Commission FCC 01-316 Federal Communications Commission FCC 01-316 c d � � � � � �@��� @& > - ? � �tm"
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-49A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-49A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-49A1.txt
    • Standard Error ----- 0.71 ----- 0.01 Overall Large 66.5 61.4 $0.51 $0.58 Standard Error 0.68 0.75 0.01 0.01 Medium 61.3 54.2 $0.56 $0.66 Standard Error 1.21 0.99 0.02 0.01 Small ----- 43.9 ----- $0.76 Standard Error ----- 1.20 ----- 0.02 Very Small ----- 26.9 ----- $1.09 Standard Error ----- 1.84 ----- 0.08 Overall Small 44.3 41.0 $0.71 $0.82 Standard Error 1.45 1.31 0.03 0.03 1999 Very Large ----- 60.9 ----- $0.56 Standard Error ----- 0.85 ----- 0.01 Large ----- 57.9 ----- $0.58 Standard Error ----- 0.69 ----- 0.01 Overall Large 64.1 59.1 $0.50 $0.57 Standard Error 0.76 0.75 0.01 0.01 Medium 59.3 50.6 $0.56 $0.66 Standard Error 1.28 0.94 0.02 0.01 Small ----- 41.2 ----- $0.77 Standard Error ----- 1.04 -----
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-107A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-107A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-107A1.txt
    • Standard error 0.55 0.84 0.54 -- --- Programming total $33.75 $31.66 $33.89 $2.23 7.0%* Standard error 0.37 0.62 0.35 -- --- Equipment $3.24 $3.27 $3.24 -$0.03 -0.9% Standard error 0.13 0.18 0.13 -- --- Programming and equipment $36.99 $34.93 $37.13 $2.20 6.3%* Standard error 0.39 0.69 0.37 -- --- Number of channels 59.37 60.92 59.27 -1.65 -2.7% Standard error 1.03 1.45 1.00 -- --- Rate per channel � $0.600 $0.551 $0.603 $0.052 9.4%* Standard error 0.01 0.02 0.01 -- --- No. of satellite channels 44.88 46.42 44.79 -1.63 -3.5% Standard error 0.89 1.26 0.86 -- --- Rate per satellite channel $0.801 $0.744 $0.805 $0.061 8.2% Standard error 0.02 0.04 0.02 -- --- July 1, 2000 BST $12.57 $11.95 $12.62 $0.67 5.6%
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-205A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-205A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-205A1.txt
    • 5 10 1,250 1,366 27 25 1,250 Marine (Ship) 5,200 10 550,000 601,150 12 10 520,000 GMRS 3,180 5 50,000 54,650 3 5 79,500 Aviation (Aircraft) 2,700 10 175,000 191,275 7 5 135,000 Marine (Coast) 900 10 65,000 71,045 8 10 90,000 Aviation (Ground) 2,000 5 85,000 92,905 9 10 100,000 Amateur Vanity Call Signs 9,000 10 120,000 131,160 1.46 1.45 130,500 AM Class A 76 1 146,300 159,906 2,104 2,100 159,600 AM Class B 1,672 1 1,806,300 1,974,286 1,181 1,175 1,964,600 AM Class C 990 1 618,760 676,305 683 685 678,150 AM Class D 1,933 1 2,033,850 2,222,998 1,150 1,150 2,222,950 FM Classes A, B1 & C3 3,192 1 4,160,000 4,546,880 1,424 1,425 4,548,600 FM Classes B, C, C1 &
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-318A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-318A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-318A1.txt
    • such certification, no later than 21 days prior to such filing, the wireless carrier must notify the affected PSAP, in writing, of its intent to file such certification. Any response that the carrier receives from the PSAP must be included with the carrier's certification filing. (ii) The certification process shall be subject to the procedural requirements set forth in sections 1.45 and 1.47 of this chapter. (iii) The certification must be in the form of an affidavit signed by a director or officer of the carrier, documenting: (A) the basis for the carrier's determination that the PSAP will not be ready; (B) each of the specific steps the carrier has taken to provide the E911 service requested; (C) the reasons why
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-318A1_Erratum.doc
    • such certification, no later than 21 days prior to such filing, the wireless carrier must notify the affected PSAP, in writing, of its intent to file such certification. Any response that the carrier receives from the PSAP must be included with the carrier's certification filing. (ii) The certification process shall be subject to the procedural requirements set forth in sections 1.45 and 1.47 of this chapter. (iii) The certification must be in the form of an affidavit signed by a director or officer of the carrier, documenting: (A) the basis for the carrier's determination that the PSAP will not be ready; (B) each of the specific steps the carrier has taken to provide the E911 service requested; (C) the reasons why
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-330A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-330A1.txt
    • 7 Resale Business POTS field work 1.47 2.29 1.25 2.38 1.08 2.39 1.48 2.19 2.19 2.15 7 Resale Business POTS no field work 0.46 0.73 0.75 1.00 0.57 0.84 0.35 0.83 0.55 0.73 7 Resale Centrex field work 4.43 5.01 5.13 4.52 4.56 4.30 4.38 4.31 3.00 4.19a e 7 Resale Centrex no field work 1.00 2.87 3.20 3.09 2.69 1.45 1.42 1.58 1.08 1.68 7 Resale ISDN BRI field work 9.56 14.33 9.88 7.00 9.45 8.76 9.24a cde 7 Resale ISDN BRI no field work 2.99 15.00 3.19 4.81 2.46 1.88abcde 7 Resale PBX field work 8.68 7.18 6.17 7.99 1.33 6.58abcde 7 Resale PBX no field work 7.58 6.36 4.65 5.99 1.00 5.04abcde 7 Resale Residential POTS field work
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-331A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-331A1.txt
    • 6.89% 11.17% 7.49% 9.31% 5.41% 10.57% 6.36% 9.93% 2.07% 12.04% Average Completion Notice Interval - Mechanized B.2.21.3.1.1Loop + Port Combinations/<10 circuits/Dispatch/FL (hours) 3.68 0.44 4.33 1.23 6.54 0.45 5.77 0.31 4.93 0.04 B.2.21.3.1.2Loop + Port Combinations/<10 circuits/Non-Dispatch/FL (hours) 1.12 0.75 1.25 0.83 1.32 0.79 1.07 0.68 0.96 0.63 B.2.21.3.1.3Loop + Port Combinations/<10 circuits/Switch Based Orders/FL (hours) 1.25 0.77 1.37 0.87 1.45 0.81 1.16 0.66 1.04 0.65 B - 36 Metric Metric Name [SQM Number] May June July August September Number and Disaggregation BST CLEC BST CLEC BST CLEC BST CLEC BST CLEC Notes Federal Communications Commission FCC 02-331 Florida Performance Metric Data B.2.21.3.1.4Loop + Port Combinations/<10 circuits/Dispatch In/FL (hours) 0.99 0.73 1.13 0.80 1.15 0.77 0.96 0.69 0.88 0.62 B.2.21.3.2.1Loop +
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-63A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-63A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-63A1.txt
    • Open Orders in a Hold Status > 90 Days 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Maintenance MR-2 - Trouble Report Rate MR-2-01-5000 Network Trouble Report Rate 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 MR-4 - Trouble Duration Intervals MR-4-01-5000 Mean Time To Repair - Total NA NA 0.17 0.3 NA 2.65 0.97 NA 1.45 NA 2,3 MR-4-04-5000 % Cleared (all troubles) within 24 Hours NA NA 100 100 NA 100 100 NA 100 NA 2,3 MR-4-05-5000 % Out of Service > 2 Hours NA NA 0 0 NA 100 0 NA 0 NA 2,3 MR-4-06-5000 % Out of Service > 4 Hours NA NA 0 0 NA 0 0 NA 0 NA 2,3 MR-4-07-5000
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-63A2.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-63A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-63A2.txt
    • % Out of Service > 24 Hours 28 16.7 30 50 25 5.88 26 0 25 20 1,2,4,5 MR-5 - Repeat Trouble Reports MR-5-01-3343 % Repeat Reports within 30 Days 47 42.9 44 100 46 17.65 52 14.29 56 20 1,2,4,5 Special Services - Maintenance MR-2 - Trouble Report Rate MR-2-01-3200 Network Trouble Report Rate 0.3 1.21 0.3 1.89 0.2 1.45 0.2 1.49 0.2 1.62 MR-2-05-3200 % CPE/TOK/FOK Trouble Report Rate 0.4 2.11 0.4 2.84 0.3 1.94 0.3 2.66 0.3 2.63 MR-4 - Trouble Duration Intervals MR-4-01-3200 Mean Time To Repair - Total 8.2 7.82 7.1 7.01 6.9 7.23 7.8 7.45 5 MR-4-04-3200 % Cleared (all troubles) within 24 Hours 95 100 97 97 98 98 97 100 5 MR-4-06-3200 %
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-92A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-92A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-92A1.txt
    • 5 10 1,250 1,366 27 25 1,250 Marine (Ship) 5,200 10 550,000 601,150 12 10 520,000 GMRS 3,180 5 50,000 54,650 3 5 79,500 Aviation (Aircraft) 2,700 10 175,000 191,275 7 5 135,000 Marine (Coast) 900 10 65,000 71,045 8 10 90,000 Aviation (Ground) 2,000 5 85,000 92,905 9 10 100,000 Amateur Vanity Call Signs 9,000 10 120,000 131,160 1.46 1.45 130,500 AM Class A 76 1 146,300 159,906 2,104 2,100 159,600 AM Class B 1,672 1 1,806,300 1,974,286 1,181 1,175 1,964,600 AM Class C 990 1 618,760 676,305 683 685 678,150 AM Class D 1,933 1 2,033,850 2,222,998 1,150 1,150 2,222,950 FM Classes A, B1 & C3 3,192 1 4,160,000 4,546,880 1,424 1,425 4,548,600 FM Classes B, C, C1 &
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-136A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-136A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-136A1.txt
    • $16.59 $14.35 Standard error � 1.22 1.12 0.46 0.79 1.60 CPST $18.00 $17.23 $22.08 $17.89 $10.34 Standard error 1.77 1.91 0.65 1.10 2.33 Programming total $34.37 $34.28 $34.41 $34.48 $24.69 Standard error 1.29 1.32 0.54 0.60 1.35 Equipment $3.24 $2.77 $4.07 $2.08 $0.79 Standard error 0.33 0.35 0.18 0.24 0.42 Programming & equipment $37.61 $37.05 $38.48 $36.56 $25.48 Standard error 1.45 1.59 0.62 0.70 1.52 Channels 60.9 53.9 67.6 53.4 50.4 Standard error 2.7 3.2 1.0 1.8 3.6 Rate per channel $0.646 $0.776 $0.577 $0.762 $0.528 Standard error 0.034 0.043 0.011 0.033 0.036 Satellite channels 46.4 42.2 51.1 41.5 39.5 Standard error 2.3 2.6 0.9 1.5 3.2 Rate per satellite channel $0.864 $1.105 $0.771 $1.010 $0.679 Standard error 0.052 0.114 0.017
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-15A4.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-15A4.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-15A4.txt
    • to future MSV MSS and ATC operations. The results of this analysis are summarized in Table 2.1.1.B. Table 2.1.1.A - Comparison of Current Operations and Future MSS and ATC Terminal Usage on Inmarsat-3 and Inmarsat-4 for Adjacent Band Situation Inmarsat 3 Inmarsat 4 Parameter Units Current MSS ATC Current MSS ATC Terminal Terminal Terminal Terminal Terminal Terminal Inmarsat G/T (dB/K) -1.45 -1.45 -1.45 12.87 12.87 12.87 Noise Temp (K) 700 700 700 650 650 650 Noise Density (No) (dBW/Hz) -200.2 -200.2 -200.2 -200.5 -200.5 -200.5 MT EIRP (dBW) 16 5 0 16 5 0 Bandwidth (kHz) 6 50 200 6 50 200 MT EIRP Density (dBW/Hz) -21.8 -42.0 -53.0 -21.8 -42.0 -53.0 Inmarsat Gain (dBi) 27 27 27 41 41 41
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-15A4_Erratum.doc
    • to future MSV MSS and ATC operations. The results of this analysis are summarized in Table 2.1.1.B. Table 2.1.1.A - Comparison of Current Operations and Future MSS and ATC Terminal Usage on Inmarsat-3 and Inmarsat-4 for Adjacent Band Situation Inmarsat 3 Inmarsat 4 Parameter Units Current MSS ATC Current MSS ATC Terminal Terminal Terminal Terminal Terminal Terminal Inmarsat G/T (dB/K) -1.45 -1.45 -1.45 12.87 12.87 12.87 Noise Temp (K) 700 700 700 650 650 650 Noise Density (No) (dBW/Hz) -200.2 -200.2 -200.2 -200.5 -200.5 -200.5 MT EIRP (dBW) 16 5 0 16 5 0 Bandwidth (kHz) 6 50 200 6 50 200 MT EIRP Density (dBW/Hz) -21.8 -42.0 -53.0 -21.8 -42.0 -53.0 Inmarsat Gain (dBi) 27 27 27 41 41 41
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-228A4.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-228A4.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-228A4.txt
    • 14 (1997) (SWBT Oklahoma Order). SWBT Kansas/Oklahoma Order, 16 FCC Rcd at 6357, para. 42; see also Ameritech Michigan Order, 12 FCC Rcd at 20585, para. 78. Michigan Commission Comments at 29. Michigan Commission Comments at 28-29. As noted above, Michigan staff reports that as of Dec. 31, 2002, its survey of carriers found that 54 competitive LECs served approximately 1.45 million access lines in Michigan. Michigan Commission Supplemental Comments, Attach. at 4. Of those competitive LEC lines, there were 58,617 resold lines, 932,667 lines served via UNE-platform, 264,600 lines served via unbundled network facilities, and an estimated 148,691 lines served over the competitive LECs' own self-provided facilities. Id. CLECA asserts that SBC's estimate of competitive LEC market share for Michigan
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-249A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-249A1.pdf
    • a rate reasonably comparable to urban rates nationwide. 47 U.S.C. � 254(e); 47 C.F.R. � 54.313(d)(3). 47 C.F.R. � 54.313(a). NASUCA Comments at 14. Recommended Decision, 17 FCC Rcd at 20736-37, para. 50. Id. Recommended Decision, 17 FCC Rcd at 20736-37, 40, paras. 50, 56. The public notice will set forth the pleading schedule. See also 47 C.F.R. �� 1.4, 1.45. The Commission does not anticipate acting on any state requests for further action while the Further Notice is pending. See infra part V.C. California Comments at 14, CUSC Comments at 13-14, Montana and Vermont Comments at 39, New York Comments at 2-3. Recommended Decision, 17 FCC Rcd at 20740, para. 56. Wisconsin Comments at 3-4. California Comments at 15; New
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-305A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-305A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-305A1.txt
    • carrier's certification is inaccurate. Finally, the rule provides for notice of the certification to the PSAP with an opportunity to comment and requires notice of the intended certification 21 days prior to the filing, a copy of the certification when it is filed with the Commission, and adherence to the procedural requirements of our general rules at 47 C.F.R. �� 1.45 and 1.47. The certification must not be based on a carrier's own failures to comply with its implementation requirements. On reconsideration, petitioners request that we eliminate the rule and the certification requirements. Specifically, Cingular argues that the certification process exacerbates PSAP readiness issues and prescribes a difficult course of conduct for carriers. Nextel argues that the rules create a labyrinth
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-87A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-87A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-87A1.txt
    • Disclosure on February 20, 2002. Secret and Clear Channel filed separate Oppositions to the Motion for Document Disclosure on February 21, 2002. Ringer filed a Reply on February 25, 2002. In the present context of the application for license assignment of WFCB(FM), the Motion for Document Disclosure is an unauthorized pleading and is hereby dismissed pursuant to 47 C.F.R. � 1.45. See, e.g., The Two Way Shop, 15 FCC Rcd 12439, 12441 (2000) (discovery inappropriate in case not designated for hearing); 47 C.F.R. � 1.311 (general discovery procedures to be used in cases ``designated for hearing''). Ringer filed a Supplement to the Petition to Deny (``Supplement'') on July 15, 2002, attaching a copy of a complaint filed against Clear Channel and
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-114A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-114A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-114A1.txt
    • Chief Operator, was critically injured in an automobile accident on November 4, 1997, remaining in a coma until his death on January 17, 1998. Declaration of Dierdre Kennedy at 2-3. It provides no evidence to support its contention that SFUSD did not appoint a new Chief Operator in light of Mr. Evans' incapacity and subsequent death. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.45(c) (``[t]he reply shall be limited to matters raised in the oppositions . . . .''). 47 U.S.C. � 309(k)(1). The renewal standard was amended to read as described by Section 204(a) of the Telecommunications Act of 1996, Pub. L. No. 104-104, 110 Stat. 56 (1996). See Implementation of Sections 204(a) and 204(c) of the Telecommunications Act of 1996 (Broadcast License
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-123A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-123A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-123A1.txt
    • facilities, as defined in Section 101.75(b), cannot be coordinated and constructed at comparable cost in another band. Petition at 19. . Opposition to Emergency Request for Immediate Relief, submitted by the Satellite Industry Association (May 15, 2003) (``SIA Opposition to Emergency Request''). The SIA submitted its Opposition on May 15, 2003 to comply with the filing requirements specified in section 1.45(d) of our rules. 47 C.F.R. � 1.45(d). SIA Opposition to Emergency Request at 1. Opposition to Petition for Reconsideration, submitted by the Satellite Industry Association (July 10, 2003) (``Opposition to Petition''). Reply to Opposition by Satellite Industry Association, submitted by the IMCC (June 3, 2003) (``Reply to Opposition''); Reply to Opposition to Petition for Reconsideration, submitted by the IMCC (July
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-94A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-94A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-94A1.txt
    • ``Opposition'' to the Informal Objection, to which ABS filed a ``Reply.'' An ``Informal Objection'' does not lie against a petition for reconsideration. Accordingly, we will treat ABS' ``Informal Objection'' as an Opposition to the petition for reconsideration, and we will treat DRI's ``Opposition to Informal Objection'' as a Reply to ABS' Opposition. These are the only pleadings authorized by Section 1.45 of the Commission's rules. Any additional pleadings after DRI's constructive Reply could be filed only with the Commission's permission and should have been accompanied by a petition for leave to file the unauthorized pleading. No such motions were filed with respect to any of the subsequent pleadings in this case. Ordinarily, then, those pleadings, as well as ABS' October 22,
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-199A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-199A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-199A1.txt
    • Specifications from Manufacturers of Coaxial Cable (75 ohm) Frequency Manufacturer Cable Type and Model Attenuation (dB/100 ft) Attenuation (db/50 ft) 69 MHz (low VHF) Belden RG 6/U Model 9116 1.71 0.86 Channel Master RG6 9533-500 1.79 0.90 Coleman RG 6/U Model 992127 1.9 0.95 194 MHz (high VHF) Belden RG 6/U Model 9116 2.73 1.37 Channel Master RG6 9533-500 2.89 1.45 Coleman RG 6/U Model 992127 3.2 1.6 615 MHz (UHF) Belden RG 6/U Model 9116 5.00 2.50 Channel Master RG6 9533-500 5.57 2.79 Table 7. Coaxial Cable Performance Specifications dLR points out that in all cases the attenuation values assumed in the downlead loss planning factor exceed those of available products. They therefore submit that the current DTV planning factor
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-199A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-199A2.txt
    • 4 � Specifications from Manufacturers of Coaxial Cable (75 ohm) Frequency Manufacturer Cable Type and Model Attenuation (dB/100 ft) Attenuation (50 feet of cable) Belden RG 6/U Model 9116 1.71 0.86 Channel Master RG6 9533-500 1.79 0.90 69 MHz (Low VHF) Coleman RG 6/U Model 992127 1.9 0.95 Belden RG 6/U Model 9116 2.73 1.37 Channel Master RG6 9533-500 2.89 1.45 194 MHz (High VHF) Coleman RG 6/U Model 992127 3.2 1.6 Belden RG 6/U Model 9116 5.00 2.50 615 MHz (UHF) Channel Master RG6 9533-500 5.57 2.79 du Treil, Lundin & Rackley, Inc. _______________________________________________________________________________________ Consulting Engineers 8 Table 4 � Specifications from Manufacturers of Coaxial Cable (75 ohm) Coleman RG 6/U Model 992127 6.2 3.1 3.3 Receiver Noise Figure The
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-8A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-8A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-8A1.txt
    • MO&O, 18 FCC Rcd at 18514 � 12. The Division also declined to consider ``new'' issues that were raised by the parties for the first time in a prolonged series of briefs that were found to be untimely filed outside the pleading cycle permitted by the Commission's Rules. See MO&O, 18 FCC Rcd at 18512 n.36 (citing 47 C.F.R. � 1.45). The Division did, however, ``take official notice of pertinent court opinions attached to certain pleadings.'' Id. See MO&O, 18 FCC Rcd at 18514 � 12 (citing Letter from John C. Hill, President, Paradise Cable, Inc., to Stephen Svab, Attorney, FCC (dated Aug. 20, 2001) (Hill Letter)). Mr. Hill therein noted that ``[y]ou may recall how shocked I was in our
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-169A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-169A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-169A1.txt
    • integrated, as excluded instruments. We perform estimation using the generalized method of moments. The first regression differs from the Adelphia Order only in adding TEAM COUNT. Table 1 DBS Penetration and RSN Access Independent Variables Dependent Variable: LN DBS PENETRATION Coefficient z-statistic LN CABLE PRICE 2.11* 2.15 LN CABLE CHANNELS -1.11* -2.61 PHILLY -0.53* -6.59 SANDIEGO -0.47* -5.52 CHARLOTTE -0.21 -1.45 KEYDMA 0.21* 3.29 TEAM COUNT -0.03 -1.94 DBSOVERAIR -0.09 -1.43 CABLECOMP 0.27 1.18 HDTV -0.12 -1.53 INTERNET -0.06 -0.52 LN INCOME -0.29* -2.44 LN MULTIDWELL -0.37* -10.45 LN LATITUDE -0.01 -0.03 CONSTANT -0.73 -0.26 Observations 676 Centered R-Squared 0.26 F-Statistic (14, 661) 40.57 Hansen J Statistic 27.22 * - significant at 95% confidence level Most coefficients change only slightly in
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-204A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-204A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-204A1.txt
    • interest factors raised by the full-service and LPFM station applicants or other parties. LPFM stations that wish to make a showing under this waiver standard must file an informal objection to the ``encroaching'' community of license modification application within sixty days of the Federal Register notice of such application filing. Oppositions and replies may be filed in accordance with Section 1.45 of the Rules. This presumption is rebuttable and does not bind the Commission to a particular result. We caution parties that even if the required showing is made, the Commission in the exercise of its discretion may conclude that denial of the full-service station application and grant of the waiver would not serve the public interest. We intend to narrowly
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-259A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-259A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-259A1.txt
    • having no bearing on the question of whether this transaction should be approved, and we decline to consider those arguments further. Second, in its reply, AT&T alleges that a pattern of inconsistent statements by Applicants raises questions about their candor. See AT&T Reply at 6-12. We strike these allegations as improperly made in a reply pleading. Under 47 C.F.R. � 1.45(c), replies shall be limited to matters raised in the oppositions, and new allegations may not be made in reply pleadings. See Paging Systems, Inc., Order, 21 FCC Rcd 7225, 7229 � 12 (WTB PS&PWD 2006). In any event, we have reviewed AT&T's allegations, and AT&T has failed to provide any evidence of intent to deceive the Commission that is the
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-276A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-276A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-276A1.txt
    • �� 49-50. Id. at 10485-86 � 50. Petition for Partial Reconsideration of City of Boston, et al., filed June 14, 2007 (Boston Petition). Sprint filed an opposition to Boston's Petition. Opposition of Sprint Nextel Corp. (Oct. 16, 2007) (Sprint Opposition). The Boston Petitioners filed a Motion to Strike Sprint's Opposition, arguing that it was untimely filed under 47 C.F.R. � 1.45(b) of our rules. See Motion to Strike of the City of Boston (Oct. 30, 2007). Sprint opposed the Motion. See Opposition to Motion to Strike of Sprint Nextel Corp. (Nov. 9, 2007). On November 14, 2007, Petitioners sought to withdraw their Motion to Strike. See Reply to Opposition to Petition for Reconsideration and Opposition to Motion to Strike of City
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-53A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-53A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-53A1.txt
    • (``Birach I'') (assignee's greater broadcast experience not a relevant good cause for waiver of construction period rule), recon. denied, 20 FCC Rcd 5764 (2005) (``Birach II''). See 47 C.F.R. � 73.3598(c). See Birach I, supra n.10, 18 FCC Rcd at 1416. See May Decision at 2 (citing Streamlining Order, supra n.8, 13 FCC Rcd at 23091). See 47 C.F.R. � 1.45(b). Specifically, Birach argues that the staff has already considered and denied New World's challenges to the grant of WDMV(AM)'s construction permit, and New World did not seek Commission review of those decisions. See Opposition to Request for Leave at 3. The May Decision was a staff letter of the type not generally released or placed on a public notice, but
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-61A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-61A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-61A1.txt
    • at 3, Ex. C. The information relates to events in 2002 and earlier, and NSTN offers no explanation why it could not have been submitted sooner. Moreover, an application for review may not rely on questions of law or fact upon which the designated authority was afforded no opportunity to pass. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.115(c). See 47 C.F.R. � 1.45(c). See 47 C.F.R. � 1.939(d); Area Christian Television, Inc., Memorandum Opinion and Order, 60 Rad. Reg. 2d (P&F) 862, 864 (1986). The entire petition to deny was reproduced in a footnote in the Order on Reconsideration. See Order on Reconsideration, 21 FCC Rcd at 3771 n.26. See Order, 21 FCC Rcd at 5153 � 5. We do not believe that
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-72A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-72A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-72A1.txt
    • remaining on its allotted channel 44 would not serve its city of license, and our analysis indicates that it will. WWAZ also fails to explain the relationship between moving to channel 9 and offering Spanish language programming. WWAZ's petition acknowledges interference to one station and requests a waiver. The Commission's interference analysis shows that the requested channel change would cause 1.45 percent interference to WMVS, Milwaukee, WI (analog channel 10, digital channel 8 for both pre- and post-transition), and 2.19 percent interference to WAOW, Wausau, WI (analog channel 9, pre-transition digital channel 29, and post-transition digital channel 9). In view of the impermissible interference caused by the proposed WWAZ channel substitution to two other stations, we deny its channel substitution request
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-09-102A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-09-102A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-09-102A1.txt
    • may request cancellation of an operator/primary station license grant on account of the licensee's death by submitting a signed request that includes a death certificate, obituary, or Social Security Death Index (SSDI) data clearly showing that the person named in the operator/primary station license grant has died. Such requests may be submitted as pleadings associated with the license. See Section 1.45 of this chapter. In addition, the Commission may cancel an operator/primary station license grant if it becomes aware of the grantee's death through other means. For purposes of this section, when SSDI data is submitted, it must be based on the Social Security Administration Death Master File current at the time of the request. 47 C.F.R. Part 97, hereafter referred
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-09-92A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-09-92A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-09-92A1.txt
    • that the Petition for Reconsideration filed by National Association of Broadcasters IS GRANTED to the extent discussed herein AND is otherwise DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Petition for Reconsideration filed by David Wilson IS DISMISSED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Reply to Opposition to Petition for Reconsideration filed by CBS Corporation IS DISMISSED, see 47 C.F.R. � 1.45(c), and will be treated as an ex parte filing. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Commission's Consumer and Governmental Affairs Bureau, Reference Information Center, SHALL SEND a copy of the Memorandum Opinion and Order, including the Supplemental Final Regulatory Flexibility Analysis, and a copy of the Fifth Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, including the Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis, to the
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-189A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-189A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-189A1.txt
    • cancellation of an operator/primary station license grant on account of the licensee's death by submitting a signed request that includes a death certificate, obituary, or Social Security Death Index data that shows the person named in the operator/primary station license grant has died. Such a request may be submitted as a pleading associated with the deceased licensee's license. See section 1.45 of this chapter. In addition, the Commission may cancel an operator/primary station license grant if it becomes aware of the grantee's death through other means. No action will be taken during the last thirty days of the post-expiration grace period (see section 97.21(b) of this chapter) on a request to cancel a license due to the licensee's death. (b) A
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-161A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-161A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-161A1.txt
    • -0.205* -0.417 (-0.45) (0.54) (1.06) (0.11) (0.61) (-0.72) (-0.24) (-0.84) (1.35) (0.8 5) (-2.03) (-0.92) Land_Area_nu 0.138*** 0.135** 0.161* 0.234* 0.0543 0.135** 0.204** 0.011 4 0.125** 0.181** 0.197*** 0.321 (4.75) (3.07) (2.03) (2.23) (1.05) (2.73) (3.18) (0.12) (3.08) (3.00) ( 4.47) (1.96) Land_Area_uc 0.0226 0.0142 -0.0659 0.0955 -0.214 -0.0018 0.0815 0.153 -0 .0904 -0.114 -0.128 -0.269 (0.33) (0.12) (-0.23) (0.29) (-1.45) (-0.01) (0.53) (0.65) (-1.06) (-0. 87) (-0.91) (-0.77) Land_Area_ua -0.107 0.108 0.524 -0.0237 0.140 -0.242 0.0972 0.190 -0.110 0.263 -0.413** -0.476 (-1.59) (0.51) (1.12) (-0.04) (0.56) (-1.95) (0.38) (0.50) (-0.84) (0.9 7) (-3.12) (-0.79) Percent_Water 0.905** -0.0899 -0.825 -1.349 0.167 -0.260 0.654 1.685* 0.375 -0.762 -0 .166 0.131 (3.00) (-0.21) (-0.73) (-0.94) (0.20) (-0.59) (0.84) (2.08) (0.76) (-1. 19) (-0.21)
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-16A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-16A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-16A1.txt
    • in a proceeding could be accessed electronically in any event; or otherwise would not be in the public interest. Finally, we address a related suggestion responding to the Notice. Verizon proposes that the Commission ``revise its rules so that the time to file oppositions to Petitions for Declaratory Ruling is not governed by the default ten-day rule found in Rule 1.45(b).'' Instead, Verizon suggests that such petitions ``should be treated like rulemakings: they should be docketed, and the Commission should specify filing dates in a public notice.'' Verizon explains that petitions for declaratory ruling often raise complicated questions of law and policy that require more than ten days to respond. Additionally, because of delays in posting such petitions electronically, the actual
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-67A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-67A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-67A1.txt
    • C.F.R. � 73.3587. We deny MBMC's request that we strike these portions of the HSARG Objection because they are not responsive to matters set forth in the MBMC Petition. Reply at 3, citing Aljir Broadcasting Co., Inc., Memorandum Opinion and Order, 12 FCC 2d 163 (Rev. Bd. 1968) (``Aljir''). We note that Aljir enunciated the principle laid out in Section 1.45(c) of the Rules that replies are limited ``to matters raised in the opposition[ ].'' Aljir, 12 FCC 2d at 164. See also 47 C.F.R. � 1.45(c). However, Section 1.45(b), which governs oppositions, contains no such limitation. 47 C.F.R. � 1.45(b). As such, MBMC's reliance on Aljir is misplaced. Reply at 2. See 47 C.F.R. � 73.3587. See FCC Form 340,
  • http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Cable/Orders/1998/fcc98116.pdf http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Cable/Orders/1998/fcc98116.wp
    • rules allow any interested party to request Commission action. The request should contain the facts relied upon, the relief sought, and the statutory and/or regulatory provisions pursuant to which the request is filed and under which the relief is sought. Oppositions to the petition are to be filed within 10 days of the petition filing date. 47 C.F.R. �� 1.41, 1.45. 67See 47 C.F.R. � 68.200. 68CEMA Comments at 18; Circuit City Comments at 6; ITI Comments at 15; Uniden Comments at 3. 69Zenith notes that the telephone is a point-to-point switched system connecting to a single user, whereas the typical cable system is point-to-multipoint broadcast system where the signal is everywhere in the system. Zenith Comments at 3. See also
  • http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Cable/Reports/fcc01001.doc http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Cable/Reports/fcc01001.pdf http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Cable/Reports/fcc01001.txt
    • buildings had to be under common ownership, control, or management. 1997 Report, 13 FCC Rcd at 1085 � 82, n. 297. Id. at 1085 � 83. Ten Largest Private Cable Operators/Multiple System Operators, Private Cable & Wireless Cable, Dec. 1999, at 4. Id. 1999 Report, 15 FCC Rcd at 1023 � 94. NCTA Comments at 9. Last year, NCTA reported 1.45 million SMATV subscribers, which rounds to 1.5 million. See 1999 Report, 15 FCC Rcd at 1023-24 � 95. This year NCTA reports 1.5 million SMATV subscribers. See NCTA Comments at 9. See Mor Allon, Competition for Convergence: The Battle Cry for Bundled Services, Private & Wireless Broadband, Sept. 2000, at 32; see also Gerard Lavery Lederer, Critical Connection?, Private &
  • http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1998/da982333.pdf http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1998/da982333.txt http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1998/da982333.wp
    • Beach Petition; Long Island Petition; School Union 87 Petition; District No. 60 Petition; and District 267 Petition. 12 Four School Districts in Maine Seek Waiver of Urban-Rural Designation, CC Docket No. 96-45, Public Notice, DA 98-291 (rel. Feb. 13, 1998). Three additional school districts subsequently filed similar petitions. Parties had an opportunity to comment on those petitions pursuant to section 1.45 of the Commission's rules. 47 C.F.R. � 1.45. 13 River Valley Petition at 1. 3 (ORHP/HHS).8 ORHP/HHS uses the Office of Management and Budget's (OMB) Metropolitan Statistical Area (MSA) designation of metropolitan and non-metropolitan counties (or county equivalents), adjusted by the most currently available Goldsmith Modification, which identifies rural areas within large metropolitan counties.9 The Commission adopted this approach because
  • http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/fcc01029.doc http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/fcc01029.pdf http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/fcc01029.txt
    • competing carriers in Oklahoma minimizes service disruptions that may deny an efficient competitor with a meaningful opportunity to compete. We conclude that SWBT demonstrates that competing carrier end users experience only very low rates of installation troubles on lines provisioned by CHCs. From June through August 2000, competing carriers experienced troubles within 7 days after installation on an average of 1.45 percent of CHCs in Kansas and 2.34 percent of CHCs in Oklahoma. Although the Oklahoma trouble report data are slightly higher than that which we found to comply with checklist item 4 in Texas, there were only three reported instances of trouble in Oklahoma, and no commenter has complained about SWBT's Oklahoma CHC performance from July 2000 through October 2000.
  • http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1997/fcc97330.html http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1997/fcc97330.txt http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1997/fcc97330.wp
    • replies will be treated as early-filed replies; and dispositive motions filed after the due date for replies will be treated as ex parte submissions. Such motions will be counted toward the applicable page limit for the submitting party, as established in this Public Notice. Non-dispositive motions (e.g., motions to strike) will be subject to the default pleading cycle in section 1.45 of our rules,[13]^(11) unless the Commission or Bureau determines otherwise in a public notice. Because of the expedited nature of section 271 proceedings, section 1.4(h) of our rules will not apply to motions filed in section 271 proceedings.[14]^(12) Thus, parties will not be allowed an extra three days (beyond the time permitted in section 1.45) to respond to non-dispositive motions
  • http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1999/da991994.doc http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1999/da991994.html http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1999/da991994.pdf http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1999/da991994.txt
    • replies will be treated as early-filed replies; and dispositive motions filed after the due date for replies will be treated as ex parte submissions. Such motions will be counted toward the applicable page limit for the submitting party, as established in this Public Notice. Non-dispositive motions (e.g., motions to strike) will be subject to the default pleading cycle in section 1.45 of the Commission's rules, unless the Commission or Bureau determines otherwise in a public notice. Because of the expedited nature of section 271 proceedings, section 1.4(h) of the Commission's rules will not apply to motions filed in section 271 proceedings. Thus, parties will not be allowed an extra three days (beyond the time permitted in section 1.45) to respond to
  • http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Orders/1997/fcc97303.pdf http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Orders/1997/fcc97303.txt http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Orders/1997/fcc97303.wp
    • Requests for Relief 149. We seek comment on the following proposed procedures for reviewing requests for relief filed under Section 332(c)(7)(B)(v) of the Communications Act. We propose that parties seeking relief file a request for declaratory ruling pursuant to Section 1.2 of the Commission's Rules, asking that the Commission review the state or local regulation and grant appropriate relief.207 Sections 1.45 through 1.49 of the Commission's Rules, concerning the filing of pleadings and responsive pleadings, shall be applicable with respect to such 207See 47 C.F.R. � 1.2. 63 Federal Communications Commission FCC 97-303 requests.208 We propose that a copy of the request be served on the state or local authority that took the action or failed to take the action against
  • http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/International/Orders/1999/fcc99073.pdf http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/International/Orders/1999/fcc99073.txt http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/International/Orders/1999/fcc99073.wp
    • have been filed, and (2) The International Bureau has not notified the carrier that grant of the modification request may not serve the public interest and that implementation of the proposed modification must await formal staff action on the modification request. If objections or comments are filed, the carrier requesting the modification request may file a response pursuant to � 1.45 of this chapter. Modification requests that are formally opposed must await formal action by the International Bureau before the proposed modification can be implemented. 12. Section 64.1002 is removed. Section 64.1002 Alternative settlement arrangements. [Removed] Federal Communications Commission FCC 99-73 45 Appendix B Commenting Parties Parties filing comments AT&T Ameritech Bell Atlantic BellSouth BT North America Cable & Wireless USA,
  • http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Notices/1998/fcc98025.pdf http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Notices/1998/fcc98025.txt http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Notices/1998/fcc98025.wp
    • more limited budgets and resources. We recognize that some applicants may not have access to computers with the hardware and capability to utilize the software necessary to submit their applications electronically, particularly since electronic filing will be accomplished by dial-in procedures and not over the Federal Communications Commission FCC 98-25 See 47 C.F.R. � 1.51. 34 See 47 C.F.R. �� 1.45(a) and (b), 22.105(d). 35 Improvement Notice of Inquiry, supra. 36 See, e.g., comments filed in PP Docket No. 96-17: PCIA Comments at 4-5, SBC Comments at 22, Vanguard 37 Comments at 3; Becker and Associates Comments at 5; Jim Wills Comments at 2; AT&T Comments at 4-6; Association of Public Safety Communications Officials Comments at 10. See, e.g., 47 C.F.R.
  • http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Public_Notices/1998/da980572.pdf
    • be submitted. Application processing and grant. Within thirty (30) days after the Commission gives public notice that the FCC Form 601s are acceptable for filing, petitions to deny may be filed. 47 C.F.R. � 1.2108(b). An applicant may file an opposition to any petitions to deny within ten days after the original pleading is filed. See 47 C.F.R. �� 1.4, 1.45(a), 1.2108(c). A reply to the opposition may be filed within five days after the time for filing opposition has expired. 47 C.F.R. � 1.4, 1.45(b). After the FCC reviews an applicant's FCC Form 601 and any associated filings, a determination will be made as to whether there are any reasons why the license should not be granted. If there are
  • http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Public_Notices/2000/da000726.doc http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Public_Notices/2000/da000726.html http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Public_Notices/2000/da000726.txt
    • system malfunctions in using handsets with upgraded software compliant with the rule. Motorola states that it needs the limited authority to manufacture 30,000 additional specialized analog handsets for its Telematics product without the 911 call completion software modifications because inventory handsets manufactured prior to February 13, 2000 are expected to be exhausted by the middle of April. Pursuant to Sections 1.45 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. Section 1.45, interested parties may file comments on the Motorola request no later than Monday, April 10, 2000. Replies shall be filed no later than Monday, April 17, 2000. All comments shall reference the docket number of this proceeding. Comments may be filed using the Commission's Electronic Comment Filing System (ECFS) or by filing
  • http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireline_Competition/Orders/2002/fcc02118.pdf
    • CLE C VZ CLE C VZ CLE C VZ CLE C PO-4-01- 6662 % Notices Sent on Time - Ind. Std., Verizon Orig. & CLEC Orig. NA NA 100 TROUBLE REPORTING (OSS) MR-1 - Response Time OSS Maintenance Interface MR-1-01- 2000 Create Trouble 5.93 6.3 6.07 5.72 5.97 3.92 5.72 3.69 6.22 3.6 MR-1-02- 2000 Status Trouble 4.7 3.24 5.01 1.45 5.56 0.45 5.57 0.45 5.43 0.39 MR-1-03- 2000 Modify Trouble 5.86 6 6.02 8.03 5.9 8.62 5.67 0.46 6.24 NA a,b,c,d MR-1-04- 2000 Request Cancellation of Trouble 7 8.13 7.17 7.97 7.14 6.02 6.76 2.42 7.43 2.22 d MR-1-05- 2000 Trouble Report History (by TN/Circuit) 0.55 2.59 0.39 1.75 0.33 1.01 0.32 1.16 0.52 0.99 MR-1-06- 2000 Test Trouble (POTS
  • http://transition.fcc.gov/Daily_Releases/Daily_Business/2012/db0620/DA-12-974A1.doc http://transition.fcc.gov/Daily_Releases/Daily_Business/2012/db0620/DA-12-974A1.pdf
    • Linda Ray, Broadband Division, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau, at (202) 418-0257, or Kate Matraves, Spectrum and Competition Policy Division, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau, at (202) 418-7878. -FCC- 47 U.S.C. � 310(d). File No. 0005219145 is the lead application for this transaction. 47 C.F.R. � 1.1200(a). 47 C.F.R. � 1.1206. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.1206(b)(1). See id. Id. � 1.1206(b). See 47 C.F.R. �1.45(c). See FCC Announces Change in Filing Location for Paper Documents, Public Notice, 24 FCC Rcd 14312 (2009). $ � � [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ �����PNG > �!�R>^��S�S߿�"K�k������er4 �J�dM�O�O � �,I TV��5 0�z̪�� ��� %�o� �� � �a�% Tf(c) U~��Uy�Ӛ�o=�c� {�YAD ���Zv�}�YAD e/�,�-�%E9 ^1�J 2��
  • http://transition.fcc.gov/cgb/dro/e911.doc
    • technology are adopted in an international standards-setting process will affect either the speed with which a TTY solution can be developed and implemented, or the type of solution that is adopted. III. Procedural Matters We remind parties that the Commission has granted waivers to carriers pending a decision on the implementation date. Those waivers remain in effect. Pursuant to Section 1.45 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.45, interested parties may file comments on the proposed implementation deadline no later than June 19, 2000. Replies shall be filed no later than July 19, 2000. All comments shall reference the docket number of this proceeding. Comments may be filed using the Commission's Electronic Comment Filing System (ECFS) or by filing paper
  • http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2002/DA-02-1945A1.html
    • not find any other type of sanction to be necessary or justified at this time. 32. Finally, Lincoln asserts that we should sanction Minority for filing frivolous pleadings that have abused the Commission's processes. We decline to do so. Minority's pleadings filed relative to our underwriting investigation were not unauthorized from a procedural standpoint. See, e.g., 47 C.F.R. 1.41 and 1.45. From a substantive standpoint, while we do not accept most of Minority's contentions, we do not find that the licensee has presented facts or legal arguments in a manner lacking good-faith or inconsistent with its right to advocate its views. IV. Ordering Clauses 33. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to Section 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended,26
  • http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2007/DA-07-2079A1.html
    • [ * * * REDACTED * * * ] information Network seeks to provide in its Reply is not germane to the bases of our determination here, see n.16, infra, and Network has made no showing of extraordinary circumstances to justify the filing of a reply not contemplated by the rules, we deny that motion. See generally 47 C.F.R. S 1.45(d). We therefore need not address APCC's filings regarding Network's request: APCC Services, Inc. v. NetworkIP, LLC and Network Enhanced Services, LLP, Opposition to Defendant's Motion for Leave to File a Reply, File No. EB-03-MD-011 (filed May 16, 2007); APCC Services, Inc. v. NetworkIP, LLC and Network Enhanced Services, LLP, Conditional Motion for Leave to File Opposition to Defendant's Reply (filed
  • http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/03/releases/da002410.doc http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/03/releases/da002410.pdf http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/03/releases/da002410.txt
    • two petitions on behalf of IVDS Enterprises Joint Venture, Instapage Network LTD, Tel/Logic, Inc., In-Sync Interactive Corporation, Loli, Inc., KMC Interactive TV, Inc., Trans Pacific Interactive, Inc. and Whitehall Wireless Corporation. These pleadings are listed in the Appendix to this ruling. Additionally, although one comment was late filed, we accepted it as an ex parte filing. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.45(b). 47 C.F.R. � 95.803(a). See Amendment of Parts 0, 1, 2 and 95 of the Commission's Rules to Provide for Interactive Video Data Services, GEN Docket No. 91-2, Notice of Proposed Rule Making, 6 FCC Rcd. 1368 (1991) (``Allocation Notice''); see also, Implementation of Section 309(j) of the Communications Act--Competitive Bidding, PP Docket No. 93-253, Second Memorandum Opinion and Order,
  • http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/05/releases/cw960005.pdf http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/05/releases/cw960005.txt http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/05/releases/cw960005.wp
    • on resolution of such requests. Petitions to deny any of the applications listed herein must be filed no later than 30 days from the date of this Public Notice. See 47 C.F.R. �� 24.830, 1.2108(b). Oppositions to petitions to deny may be filed no later than 10 days after the original petition to deny is filed. See 47 C.F.R. �� 1.45(a), 1.2108(c). Replies to the oppositions may be filed no later than 5 days after the time for filing oppositions has expired. See 47 C.F.R. �� 1.45, 1.2108. No application listed herein will be granted sooner than 31 days after the date of this Public Notice. See 47 C.F.R. � 24.827(b). All auction winners will be required to make sufficient payment
  • http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/05/releases/cw960010.pdf http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/05/releases/cw960010.txt http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/05/releases/cw960010.wp
    • 47 C.F.R. �� 24.830, 1.2108. Petitions to deny may only raise matters directly related to the amendments which could not have been raised in connection with the underlying previously filed applications. 47 C.F.R. � 24.830(b). Oppositions to petitions to deny may be filed no later than 10 days after the original petition to deny is filed. See 47 C.F.R. �� 1.45(a), 1.2108(c). Replies to the oppositions may be filed no later than 5 days after the time for filing oppositions has expired. See 47 C.F.R. �� 1.45(b), 1.2108(c). The applications listed in Attachment A, and amendments thereto, are available for review electronically. Instructions for obtaining and using the Commission's electronic viewing software are contained in Attachment B of this Public Notice.
  • http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/05/releases/cw960012.pdf http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/05/releases/cw960012.txt http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/05/releases/cw960012.wp
    • on resolution of such requests. Petitions to deny any of the applications listed herein must be filed no later than 30 days from the date of this Public Notice. See 47 C.F.R. �� 24.830, 1.2108(b). Oppositions to petitions to deny may be filed no later than 10 days after the original petition to deny is filed. See 47 C.F.R. �� 1.45(a), 1.2108(c). Replies to the oppositions may be filed no later than 5 days after the time for filing oppositions has expired. See 47 C.F.R. �� 1.45, 1.2108. No application listed herein will be granted sooner than 31 days after the date of this Public Notice. See 47 C.F.R. � 24.827(b). All auction winners will be required to make sufficient payment
  • http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/07/releases/da960709.pdf
    • Public Notice. See 47 C.F.R. �� 90.163(a)(4), 1.2108(b), 1.962(g). Petitions to deny must fully comply with the requirements for such petitions set forth in the Commission's rules. See, e.g., 47 C.F.R. �� 90.163, 1.2108, 1.962(g). Oppositions to petitions to deny must be filed no later than 10 days after the original petition to deny is filed. See 47 C.F.R. �� 1.45(a), 1.208(c), 1.962(h). Replies to oppositions must be filed no later than 5 days after the time for filing oppositions has expired. See 47 C.F.R. �� 1.45(b), 1.2108(c), 1.962(h). No application listed herein will be granted sooner than 31 days after the date of this Public Notice. See 47 C.F.R. �� 90.809(b), 90.166. A Public Notice will announce the applicants whose
  • http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/11/releases/bip_def.pdf
    • or persons with personal knowledge thereof. (c) An applicant may file an opposition to any petition to deny, and the petitioner a reply to such opposition. Allegations of fact or denials thereof must be supported by affidavit of a person or persons with personal knowledge thereof. The times for filing such opposition and replies will be those provided in � 1.45. (d) If the Commission determines that: (1) an applicant is qualified and there is no substantial and material issue of fact concerning that determination, it will grant the application. (2) an applicant is not qualified and that there is no substantial issue of fact concerning that determination, the Commission need not hold a evidentiary hearing and will deny the application.
  • http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/14/releases/wcsbip.pdf
    • or persons with personal knowledge thereof. (c) An applicant may file an opposition to any petition to deny, and the petitioner a reply to such opposition. Allegations of fact or denials thereof must be supported by affidavit of a person or persons with personal knowledge thereof. The times for filing such opposition and replies will be those provided in � 1.45. (d) If the Commission determines that: substantial issue of fact concerning that determination, the Commission need not hold a evidentiary hearing and will deny the application. (3) substantial and material issues of fact require a hearing, it will conduct a hearing. The Commission may permit all or part of the evidence to be submitted in written form and may permit
  • http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/16/releases/da971672.pdf http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/16/releases/da971672.txt http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/16/releases/da971672.wp
    • the long-form application. Unless otherwise announced, parties will have thirty days following the public notice to file petitions to deny. Oppositions to petitions to deny are due within ten days after the filing of the petition to deny. Replies to oppositions may be filed within five days after the time for filing the oppositions has expired. See 47 C.F.R. �� 1.45, 1.2105(b) and (c). If the Commission dismisses or denies all petitions to deny, the Commission will announce by public notice that it is prepared to award a license, and the winning bidder will then have ten business days to submit the balance of its winning bid. If this payment is made, the license will be granted. Winning bidders will receive
  • http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/16/releases/da972583.pdf http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/16/releases/da972583.txt http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/16/releases/da972583.wp
    • be submitted. Application processing and grant. Within thirty (30) days after the Commission gives public notice that the FCC Form 601s are acceptable for filing, petitions to deny may be filed. 47 C.F.R. � 1.2108(b). An applicant may file an opposition to any petitions to deny within ten days after the original pleading is filed. See 47 C.F.R. �� 1.4, 1.45(a), 1.2108(c). A reply to the opposition may be filed within five days after the time for filing oppositions has expired. 47 C.F.R. � 1.4, 1.45(b). After the FCC reviews an applicant's FCC Form 601 and any associated filings, a determination will be made as to whether there are any reasons why the license should not be granted. If there are
  • http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/17/releases/da980572.pdf http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/17/releases/da980572.txt http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/17/releases/da980572.wp
    • be submitted. Application processing and grant. Within thirty (30) days after the Commission gives public notice that the FCC Form 601s are acceptable for filing, petitions to deny may be filed. 47 C.F.R. � 1.2108(b). An applicant may file an opposition to any petitions to deny within ten days after the original pleading is filed. See 47 C.F.R. �� 1.4, 1.45(a), 1.2108(c). A reply to the opposition may be filed within five days after the time for filing opposition has expired. 47 C.F.R. � 1.4, 1.45(b). After the FCC reviews an applicant's FCC Form 601 and any associated filings, a determination will be made as to whether there are any reasons why the license should not be granted. If there are
  • http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/17/releases/lmdsbp_e.pdf
    • or persons with personal knowledge thereof. (c) An applicant may file an opposition to any petition to deny, and the petitioner a reply to such opposition. Allegations of fact or denials thereof must be supported by affidavit of a person or persons with personal knowledge thereof. The times for filing such opposition and replies will be those provided in s 1.45. (d) If the Commission determines that: (1) an applicant is qualified and there is no substantial and material issue of fact concerning that determination, it will grant the application. (2) an applicant is not qualified and that there is no substantial issue of fact concerning that determination, the Commission need not hold a evidentiary hearing and will deny the application.
  • http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/18/releases/da981010.pdf http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/18/releases/da981010.txt http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/18/releases/da981010.wp
    • aid potential bidders, Attachment B to this Public Notice lists pending matters of which the Commission is aware that relate to licenses or applications for the 220 MHz service. The Commission makes no representations or guarantees that the listed matters are the only pending matters that could affect spectrum availability in the 220-222 MHz band. Parties may submit 47 C.F.R. 1.45(c). 7 5 additions or corrections to the list, provided such additions or corrections are filed with the Commission within ten (10) business days from release of this Public Notice. Such submissions should be limited to identifying pleadings or papers previously filed with the Commission. No new pleadings or arguments on the merits will be accepted as explicitly provided by Commission
  • http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/20/releases/da990962.pdf http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/20/releases/da990962.txt http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/20/releases/da990962.wp
    • FCC Rcd 6584, 6585 (1992). 35 In its Reply, MariTEL argues that the Havens application should be denied because Havens failed to disclose 36 his part-ownership and directorship of a cellular and fixed microwave licensee, as required by 47 C.F.R. � 1.2112(a)(1), (5). Reply at 3-4. Reply briefs must be "limited to matters raised in the oppositions." 47 C.F.R. � 1.45(b). MariTEL contends that the issue is properly raised in its Reply because the Havens Opposition states, "Havens complied with the Commission's application rules." Reply at 3 n.3 (citing Havens Opposition at 5). The context of Havens' statement, however, was as follows: To the extent required, Havens categorically denies all of MariTEL's unsupported and derogatory allegations. Havens complied with the Commission's
  • http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/24/releases/da990474.pdf http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/24/releases/da990474.txt http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/24/releases/da990474.wp
    • Reconsideration, the Commission commenced the auction 6 of 908 Phase II 220 MHz licenses on September 15, 1998. This auction closed on October 22, 1998. Forty-four winning bidders won a total of 693 licenses. On November 24, 1998, the 7 8 Bureau released a Public Notice announcing that 225 licenses now available for auction will be 9 47 C.F.R. � 1.45(c). 10 4 included in Auction No. 24. Due Diligence: Potential bidders are reminded that there are a number of incumbent Phase I 220 MHz licensees already licensed and operating on frequencies that will be subject to the upcoming auction. Such incumbents must be protected from harmful interference by Phase II 220 MHz licensees in accordance with the Commission's Rules. See
  • http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/25/releases/fc990074.pdf http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/25/releases/fc990074.txt http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/25/releases/fc990074.wp
    • deny, and the petitioner a reply to such opposition in which allegations of fact or denials thereof shall be supported by affidavit of a person or persons with personal knowledge thereof. Except with regard to petitions to deny against the long-form applications of ITFS auction winners, the times for filing such oppositions and replies shall be those provided in � 1.45 of this chapter. STATEMENT OF CHAIRMAN WILLIAM E. KENNARD I earlier recused myself from participating in an adjudicatory licensing proceeding involving the license for a new FM station in Biltmore Forest, North Carolina. However, I declined a request to recuse myself from participating in the general rulemaking proceeding that developed the auction See Statement of Chairman William E. Kennard Regarding
  • http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/26/releases/da991591.doc http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/26/releases/da991591.pdf http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/26/releases/da991591.txt
    • Letter of Understanding with Mexico related to the temporary use of 929-932 MHz channels for paging services within 120 kilometers (75 miles) of the common border; see also U.S.-Canada Interim Coordination Considerations for the Band 929-932 MHz, as amended. SBT specifically requested that the Commission warn potential bidders of possible border conflicts. See SBT Comments at 6-8 47 C.F.R. � 1.45(c). Paging Reconsideration Order at � 97; see also 47 C.F.R. � 1.2105(c). See In re Application of Nevada Wireless for a License to Provide 800 MHz Specialized Mobile Radio Service in the Farmington, NM-CO Economic Area (EA-155) Frequency Band A, Memorandum Opinion and Order, 13 FCC Rcd 11973, 11977, & 11 (1998) ("Nevada Wireless"). See Nevada Wireless, 13 FCC Rcd
  • http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/28/releases/fc990074.pdf http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/28/releases/fc990074.txt http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/28/releases/fc990074.wp
    • deny, and the petitioner a reply to such opposition in which allegations of fact or denials thereof shall be supported by affidavit of a person or persons with personal knowledge thereof. Except with regard to petitions to deny against the long-form applications of ITFS auction winners, the times for filing such oppositions and replies shall be those provided in � 1.45 of this chapter. STATEMENT OF CHAIRMAN WILLIAM E. KENNARD I earlier recused myself from participating in an adjudicatory licensing proceeding involving the license for a new FM station in Biltmore Forest, North Carolina. However, I declined a request to recuse myself from participating in the general rulemaking proceeding that developed the auction See Statement of Chairman William E. Kennard Regarding
  • http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/32/releases/fc990074.pdf http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/32/releases/fc990074.txt http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/32/releases/fc990074.wp
    • deny, and the petitioner a reply to such opposition in which allegations of fact or denials thereof shall be supported by affidavit of a person or persons with personal knowledge thereof. Except with regard to petitions to deny against the long-form applications of ITFS auction winners, the times for filing such oppositions and replies shall be those provided in � 1.45 of this chapter. STATEMENT OF CHAIRMAN WILLIAM E. KENNARD I earlier recused myself from participating in an adjudicatory licensing proceeding involving the license for a new FM station in Biltmore Forest, North Carolina. However, I declined a request to recuse myself from participating in the general rulemaking proceeding that developed the auction See Statement of Chairman William E. Kennard Regarding
  • http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/61/comments/54564_1.pdf
    • them to adhere to the same ethical standards. It must not allow the non-attorney status of the Commenters to prevent it from enforcing its code of professional behavior on the Commenters. It is submitted, for example, that Rule Sections 1.52 and l.24(a) should apply to 3 Reply comments must be limited to matters raised previously. See, for example, Rule Sections 1.45(c) and l.106(h). - 3 - the Commenters with respect to making unsubstantiated claims and scurrilous personal attacks. The Commenters' attacks include accusing PSI of "libel" and PSI and its Counsel of "failures and abuse in AMTS licensing." 4 These attacks amount to accusations of violations of Federal law, which are very serious matters and they are not substantiated by any
  • http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/conferences/combin2000/releases/98540193.pdf
    • basis of what could be realized given the set of remaining participating bidders and their valuations. 4.2.1 Additive Environment In the additive environment analysis, we redefine "revenue" as the ratio of revenue actually collected divided by the sum of the competitive prices for the participating agents. Table 4.2.1a Normalized (Mean, Median) Revenue: Additive Environment Treatments Nonflexible Flexible Equal 1.41, 1.31 1.45, 1.45 Unequal 1.39, 1.39 1.31, 1.29 It is easy to see from table 4.2.1a that revenue is significantly above the competitive equilibrium predictions. We will discuss this over-bidding phenomenon in section 4.3 below. As we did with efficiency we estimate the ANOVA model using the normalized revenues generated from the observed auction outcomes. 24 Table 4.2.1b ANOVA Normalized Revenue: Additive
  • http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/conferences/combin2001/papers/vsmith.pdf
    • Table 9: Linear Model Parameter Estimates for Efficiency: Superadditive Environment Variable Estimate p-value Intercept 68.7 0.0 Flexible 6.29 0.002 Unequal 2.69 0.16 Level of Synergy (Medium) -3.04 0.25 Level of Synergy (High) -0.88 0.51 Number of Bidders -1.69 0.48 Overlap 3.31 0.05 CE Exists -3.25 0.11 Table 10: Normalized (Mean, Median) Revenue: Additive Environment Treatments Nonflexible Flexible Equal 1.41, 1.31 1.45, 1.45 Unequal 1.39, 1.39 1.31, 1.29 Table 11: Linear Model Parameter Estimates for Normalized Revenue: Additive Environment Variable Estimate p-value Intercept 1.46 0.0 Flexible -0.01 0.84 Unequal 0.04 0.21 Environment Pairing -0.01 0.91 Number of Bidders -0.03 0.44 Table 12: Normalized Revenue (Mean, Median): Superadditive Environment Treatments Nonflexible Flexible Equal 0.92, 0.89 0.98, 0.91 Unequal 0.72, 0.78 0.84, 0.86 Table
  • http://wireless.fcc.gov/rss/index.htm?job=ainf&id=70
    • 114 qualified bidders) * PWBs = Provisionally Winning Bidders http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/default.htm?job=auction_summary&id=70W ed, 14 Mar 2007 15:50:01 GMT Summary Permits: 120 construction permits in the FM broadcast service Qualified Bidders: 114 Rounds Completed: 22 Bidding Days: 6 Results for Round 22 Gross Revenue: $20,008,200.00 - Dollar Change: $295,100.00 - % Change: 1.50 Net Revenue: $17,162,550.00 - Dollar Change: $244,560.00 - % Change: 1.45 New Bids: 37 Withdrawn Bids: 0 Proactive Waivers: 0 Bidders that Reduced Eligibility: 7 Permits with PWBs*: 104 FCC Held Permits: 16 Eligible Bidders: 71 (of 114 qualified bidders) * PWBs = Provisionally Winning Bidders http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/default.htm?job=auction_summary&id=70W ed, 14 Mar 2007 17:05:00 GMT Summary Permits: 120 construction permits in the FM broadcast service Qualified Bidders: 114 Rounds Completed: 23 Bidding Days:
  • http://wireless.fcc.gov/rss/index.htm?job=ainf&id=91
    • 6 Permits with PWBs*: 101 FCC Held Permits: 43 Eligible Bidders: 80 (of 117 qualified bidders) * PWBs = Provisionally Winning Bidders http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/default.htm?job=auction_summary&id=91T ue, 03 May 2011 17:05:01 GMT Summary Permits: 144 construction permits for FM Broadcast Qualified Bidders: 117 Rounds Completed: 20 Bidding Days: 5 Results for Round 20 Gross Revenue: $9,446,800.00 - Dollar Change: $135,300.00 - % Change: 1.45 Net Revenue: $7,536,385.00 - Dollar Change: $70,290.00 - % Change: 0.94 New Bids: 41 Withdrawn Bids: 0 Proactive Waivers: 1 Bidders that Reduced Eligibility: 18 Permits with PWBs*: 102 FCC Held Permits: 42 Eligible Bidders: 79 (of 117 qualified bidders) * PWBs = Provisionally Winning Bidders http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/default.htm?job=auction_summary&id=91T ue, 03 May 2011 18:35:01 GMT Summary Permits: 144 construction permits for FM
  • http://wireless.fcc.gov/rss/index.htm?job=ainf&id=93
    • Bidders: 64 (of 109 qualified bidders) * PWBs = Provisionally Winning Bidders http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/default.htm?job=auction_summary&id=93T ue, 03 Apr 2012 18:35:02 GMT Summary Permits: 119 FM Broadcast construction permits Qualified Bidders: 109 Rounds Completed: 25 Bidding Days: 6 Results for Round 25 Gross Revenue: $4,360,050.00 - Dollar Change: $41,400.00 - % Change: 0.96 Net Revenue: $3,741,172.50 - Dollar Change: $53,585.00 - % Change: 1.45 New Bids: 13 Withdrawn Bids: 0 Proactive Waivers: 1 Bidders that Reduced Eligibility: 1 Permits with PWBs*: 93 FCC Held Permits: 26 Eligible Bidders: 64 (of 109 qualified bidders) * PWBs = Provisionally Winning Bidders http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/default.htm?job=auction_summary&id=93T ue, 03 Apr 2012 19:50:01 GMT Summary Permits: 119 FM Broadcast construction permits Qualified Bidders: 109 Rounds Completed: 26 Bidding Days: 6 Results for
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Cable/Notices/2000/fcc00165.doc
    • facie inconsistent with the public interest, convenience, and necessity. Such allegations of fact shall, except for those of which official notice may be taken, be supported by affidavit of a person or persons with personal knowledge thereof. (b) The applicant may file an opposition to any petition to deny, and the petitioner may file a reply to such opposition (see �1.45 of this chapter), either manually or electronically (via COALS), in which allegations of fact or denials thereof shall be supported by affidavit of a person or persons with personal knowledge thereof. (c) Notwithstanding the provisions of paragraph (a) of this section, before Commission action on any application for an instrument of authorization, any person may file informal objections to the
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Cable/Orders/1998/fcc98116.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Cable/Orders/1998/fcc98116.wp
    • rules allow any interested party to request Commission action. The request should contain the facts relied upon, the relief sought, and the statutory and/or regulatory provisions pursuant to which the request is filed and under which the relief is sought. Oppositions to the petition are to be filed within 10 days of the petition filing date. 47 C.F.R. �� 1.41, 1.45. 67See 47 C.F.R. � 68.200. 68CEMA Comments at 18; Circuit City Comments at 6; ITI Comments at 15; Uniden Comments at 3. 69Zenith notes that the telephone is a point-to-point switched system connecting to a single user, whereas the typical cable system is point-to-multipoint broadcast system where the signal is everywhere in the system. Zenith Comments at 3. See also
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Cable/Orders/2000/da000936.doc
    • Response to Request for Stay filed by TCI Cablevision of Dallas, Inc. on April 25, 2000 IS DISMISSED. This action is taken pursuant to authority delegated by 47 C.F.R. � 0.321. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION William A. Johnson Deputy Chief, Cable Services Bureau The Company tendered a Reply to Response to Request for Stay, which is being dismissed. 47 C.F.R. � 1.45(d) provides that replies to oppositions to requests for stay or other temporary relief should not be file and will not be considered. Virginia Petroleum Jobbers Ass'n v. FPC, 259 F.2d 921, 925 (D.C. Cir. 1958). See Cuomo v. NRC, 772 F.2d 972, 974 (D.C. Cir. 1985); Wisconsin Gas Co. v. FERC, 758 F.2d 669, 674 (D.C. Cir. 1985); Washington Metropolitan
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Cable/Reports/fcc01001.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Cable/Reports/fcc01001.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Cable/Reports/fcc01001.txt
    • buildings had to be under common ownership, control, or management. 1997 Report, 13 FCC Rcd at 1085 � 82, n. 297. Id. at 1085 � 83. Ten Largest Private Cable Operators/Multiple System Operators, Private Cable & Wireless Cable, Dec. 1999, at 4. Id. 1999 Report, 15 FCC Rcd at 1023 � 94. NCTA Comments at 9. Last year, NCTA reported 1.45 million SMATV subscribers, which rounds to 1.5 million. See 1999 Report, 15 FCC Rcd at 1023-24 � 95. This year NCTA reports 1.5 million SMATV subscribers. See NCTA Comments at 9. See Mor Allon, Competition for Convergence: The Battle Cry for Bundled Services, Private & Wireless Broadband, Sept. 2000, at 32; see also Gerard Lavery Lederer, Critical Connection?, Private &
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1998/da980719.pdf
    • 1998, Integrated Systems and Internet Solutions, Inc. ("ISIS") filed an objection to an FCC 471 to be filed by the Tennessee State Department of Education and a Federal Communications Commission DA 98-719 5 See Integrated Systems and Internet Solutions, Inc., Objection to Application and Request for Expedited Declaratory Ruling (filed April 3, 1998) (ISIS Objection). 6 See 47 C.F.R. � 1.45(a), (b). 7 See Letter from Debra Kriete, SLC to Jane Walters, Tennessee State Department of Education (dated April 9, 1998) ("SLC letter"). 8 See Tennessee Department of Education, Motion for Extension of Time (filed April 10, 1998) (Tennessee Motion); Education Networks of America, Motion for Extension of Time (filed April 10, 1998) (ENA Motion). 9 Tennessee Motion at 2. 10
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1998/da982333.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1998/da982333.txt http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1998/da982333.wp
    • Beach Petition; Long Island Petition; School Union 87 Petition; District No. 60 Petition; and District 267 Petition. 12 Four School Districts in Maine Seek Waiver of Urban-Rural Designation, CC Docket No. 96-45, Public Notice, DA 98-291 (rel. Feb. 13, 1998). Three additional school districts subsequently filed similar petitions. Parties had an opportunity to comment on those petitions pursuant to section 1.45 of the Commission's rules. 47 C.F.R. � 1.45. 13 River Valley Petition at 1. 3 (ORHP/HHS).8 ORHP/HHS uses the Office of Management and Budget's (OMB) Metropolitan Statistical Area (MSA) designation of metropolitan and non-metropolitan counties (or county equivalents), adjusted by the most currently available Goldsmith Modification, which identifies rural areas within large metropolitan counties.9 The Commission adopted this approach because
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da010507.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da010507.txt
    • Beehive's petition for reconsideration is premature. We nevertheless will treat Beehive's filing as comments and will address below Beehive's objections to the waiver requests. We note that except for Beehive's petition for reconsideration, which we are treating as comments, all of Beehive's filings were submitted outside the comment cycle established in this proceeding and outside the pleading cycle under section 1.45 of the Commission's rules. See Qwest/Acquiring Companies Public Notice (establishing November 13, 2000, as the deadline for reply comments); 47 C.F.R. � 1.45. In the interest of establishing a complete and comprehensive record on this matter, we believe it is in the public interest to accept these further pleadings and will treat them as ex parte presentations. See 47 C.F.R.
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/fcc01029.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/fcc01029.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/fcc01029.txt
    • competing carriers in Oklahoma minimizes service disruptions that may deny an efficient competitor with a meaningful opportunity to compete. We conclude that SWBT demonstrates that competing carrier end users experience only very low rates of installation troubles on lines provisioned by CHCs. From June through August 2000, competing carriers experienced troubles within 7 days after installation on an average of 1.45 percent of CHCs in Kansas and 2.34 percent of CHCs in Oklahoma. Although the Oklahoma trouble report data are slightly higher than that which we found to comply with checklist item 4 in Texas, there were only three reported instances of trouble in Oklahoma, and no commenter has complained about SWBT's Oklahoma CHC performance from July 2000 through October 2000.
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2002/fcc02331.pdf
    • 6.89% 11.17% 7.49% 9.31% 5.41% 10.57% 6.36% 9.93% 2.07% 12.04% Average Completion Notice Interval - Mechanized B.2.21.3.1.1Loop + Port Combinations/<10 circuits/Dispatch/FL (hours) 3.68 0.44 4.33 1.23 6.54 0.45 5.77 0.31 4.93 0.04 B.2.21.3.1.2Loop + Port Combinations/<10 circuits/Non-Dispatch/FL (hours) 1.12 0.75 1.25 0.83 1.32 0.79 1.07 0.68 0.96 0.63 B.2.21.3.1.3Loop + Port Combinations/<10 circuits/Switch Based Orders/FL (hours) 1.25 0.77 1.37 0.87 1.45 0.81 1.16 0.66 1.04 0.65 B - 36 Metric Metric Name [SQM Number] May June July August September Number and Disaggregation BST CLEC BST CLEC BST CLEC BST CLEC BST CLEC Notes Federal Communications Commission FCC 02-331 Florida Performance Metric Data B.2.21.3.1.4Loop + Port Combinations/<10 circuits/Dispatch In/FL (hours) 0.99 0.73 1.13 0.80 1.15 0.77 0.96 0.69 0.88 0.62 B.2.21.3.2.1Loop +
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1997/fcc97330.html http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1997/fcc97330.txt http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1997/fcc97330.wp
    • replies will be treated as early-filed replies; and dispositive motions filed after the due date for replies will be treated as ex parte submissions. Such motions will be counted toward the applicable page limit for the submitting party, as established in this Public Notice. Non-dispositive motions (e.g., motions to strike) will be subject to the default pleading cycle in section 1.45 of our rules,[13]^(11) unless the Commission or Bureau determines otherwise in a public notice. Because of the expedited nature of section 271 proceedings, section 1.4(h) of our rules will not apply to motions filed in section 271 proceedings.[14]^(12) Thus, parties will not be allowed an extra three days (beyond the time permitted in section 1.45) to respond to non-dispositive motions
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1999/da991994.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1999/da991994.html http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1999/da991994.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1999/da991994.txt
    • replies will be treated as early-filed replies; and dispositive motions filed after the due date for replies will be treated as ex parte submissions. Such motions will be counted toward the applicable page limit for the submitting party, as established in this Public Notice. Non-dispositive motions (e.g., motions to strike) will be subject to the default pleading cycle in section 1.45 of the Commission's rules, unless the Commission or Bureau determines otherwise in a public notice. Because of the expedited nature of section 271 proceedings, section 1.4(h) of the Commission's rules will not apply to motions filed in section 271 proceedings. Thus, parties will not be allowed an extra three days (beyond the time permitted in section 1.45) to respond to
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/2000/da002339.doc
    • that Order, Verizon not be required to implement the paragraph 36 requirements in those states where Verizon has filed on otherwise put into effect a collocation interval that matches the interval currently approved by the New York Public Utilities Commission. Interested parties may file comments regarding the petition for conditional waiver no later than October 23, 2000. We waive section 1.45 of the Commission's rules insofar as it permits reply comments. All filings regarding the petition for conditional waiver should reference the Common Carrier Bureau docket assigned to this proceeding, CC Docket No. 98-147. , and should include the following words in the body of the message, ``get form
    • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/2000/da002377.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/2000/da002377.txt
      • days depending on, among other variables, whether the requesting carrier provided a collocation forecast to Qwest at least 60 days prior to submitting its collocation application. In addition, the state commission would have to permit the SGAT to take effect. Interested parties may file comments regarding the petitions for conditional waiver no later than October 30, 2000. We waive section 1.45 of the Commission's rules insofar as it permits reply comments. All filings regarding the petitions for conditional waiver should reference the Common Carrier Bureau docket assigned to this proceeding, CC Docket No. 98-147. , and should include the following words in the body of the message, ``get form
      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/2001/da010734.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/2001/da010734.txt
        • but before the due date for replies will be treated as early-filed replies; and dispositive motions filed after the due date for replies will be treated as ex parte submissions. Such motions will be counted toward the applicable page limit for the submitting party. Non-dispositive motions (e.g., motions to strike) will be subject to the default pleading cycle in section 1.45 of the Commission's rules, unless the Commission or Bureau determines otherwise in a public notice. Because of the expedited nature of section 271 proceedings, section 1.4(h) of the Commission's rules will not apply to motions filed in section 271 proceedings. Thus, parties will not be allowed an extra three days (beyond the time permitted in section 1.45) to respond to
      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref02.pdf
        • 2.57 2.53 2.44 Total Connection Charge $49.25 $47.55 $46.60 $47.26 $47.15 $45.57 $45.01 $44.92 $44.46 $43.58 $43.70 $43.67 $43.74 $43.95 $44.10 $42.72 Additional Charge if Drop Line and Connection Block Needed NA NA 6.04 6.07 6.89 6.89 6.50 7.29 6.74 5.90 5.74 5.65 5.64 5.86 5.84 5.84 Lowest-Cost Inside Wiring Maintenance Plan 0.58 0.85 0.89 1.07 1.07 1.20 1.25 1.31 1.45 1.52 1.78 1.68 2.22 2.66 3.03 3.49 *Rates are based upon flat-rate service where available and measured/message service with one hundred 5-minute, same-zone, busin ess-day calls elsewhere. NA - Not available 4 Table 1.3 Residential Telephone Rates in the Sample Cities (As of October 15, 2001) Monthly Telephone Rate Including Touch-Tone, Cost of a Five-Minute Connection Charges Least-Cost Telephone Surcharges,
      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref03.pdf
        • 2.70 Total Connection Charge $49.25 $47.55 $46.60 $47.26 $47.15 $45.57 $45.01 $44.92 $44.46 $43.58 $43.70 $43.67 $43.74 $43.95 $44.10 $42.95 $42.39 Additional Charge if Drop Line and Connection Block Needed NA NA 6.04 6.07 6.89 6.89 6.50 7.29 6.74 5.90 5.74 5.65 5.64 5.86 5.84 5.84 5.85 Lowest-Cost Inside Wiring Maintenance Plan 0.58 0.85 0.89 1.07 1.07 1.20 1.25 1.31 1.45 1.52 1.78 1.68 2.22 2.66 3.03 3.62 3.61 *Rates are based upon flat-rate service where available and measured/message service with 100 five-minute, same-zone, business-day calls elsewhere. Table 1.2 NA - Not available. Average Residential Rates for Local Service in Urban Areas, 1986-2002 (As of October 15) Table 1.3 Residential Telephone Rates in the Sample Cities (As of October 15, 2002)
      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref04.pdf
        • 2.29 2.30 2.33 2.44 2.36 2.46 2.38 2.57 2.53 2.81 1.33 1.41 Total Connection Charge $49.25$47.55$46.60$47.26$47.15$45.57$45.01$44.92$44.46$43.58$43.70$43.67$43.74$43.95 $44.10 $42.95 $41.16 $40.76 Additional Charge if Drop Line and Connection Block Needed a1 a1 6.04 6.07 6.89 6.89 6.50 7.29 6.74 5.90 5.74 5.65 5.64 5.86 5.84 5.84 5.85 5.85 Lowest-Cost Inside Wiring Maintenance Plan 0.58 0.85 0.89 1.07 1.07 1.20 1.25 1.31 1.45 1.52 1.78 1.68 2.22 2.66 3.03 3.62 3.62 3.64 1 Not available. 2 Subject to revision. 3 Rates are based upon flat-rate service where available and measured/message service with 100 five-minute, same-zone, business-day calls elsewhere. Beginning in 2001, all rates reflect flat-rate service. 4 Beginning in 2002, rate includes additional monthly charges for touch-tone service. Table 1.2 Average Residential Rates
      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref05.pdf
        • 2.44 2.36 2.46 2.38 2.57 2.53 2.81 1.33 3.32 3.32 Total Connection Charge $49.25$47.55$46.60$47.26$47.15$45.57$45.01$44.92$44.46$43.58$43.70$43.67$43.74$43.95 $44.10 $42.95 $41.16 $42.54 $42.59 Additional Charge if Drop Line and Connection Block Needed a1 a1 6.04 6.07 6.89 6.89 6.50 7.29 6.74 5.90 5.74 5.65 5.64 5.86 5.84 5.84 5.85 12.13 12.45 Lowest-Cost Inside Wiring Maintenance Plan 0.58 0.85 0.89 1.07 1.07 1.20 1.25 1.31 1.45 1.52 1.78 1.68 2.22 2.66 3.03 3.62 3.62 3.64 3.98 1 Revised. 2 Subject to revision. 3 Rates are based upon flat-rate service where available and measured/message service with 100 five-minute, same-zone, business-day calls elsewhere. Beginning in 2001, all rates reflect flat-rate service. 4 Beginning in 2002, rate includes additional monthly charges for touch-tone service. Table 1.2 Average Residential Rates
      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref97.pdf
        • touch-tone service 1.57 1.52 1.54 1.52 1.47 1.17 1.08 1.04 0.74 0.49 (including tax) Total for touch-tone service 17.7018.1818.1119.0519.26 19.8319.7819.9819.8119.98 Lowest generally available monthly rate 5.96 5.81 5.67 5.67 5.68 6.18 6.22 6.43 6.47 6.68 Federal and state SLCs 2.04 2.66 2.67 3.53 3.55 3.56 3.55 3.55 3.55 3.54 Taxes and 911 charges 0.84 0.94 0.91 1.03 1.15 1.28 1.31 1.45 1.50 1.56 Total for rotary service 8.84 9.41 9.2510.2310.38 11.0211.0811.4311.5211.79 # of cities in the sample offering measured service n.a. 76 77 79 82 85 86 86 87 88 Monthly cost including 50 five-minute daytime calls n.a. 8.57 8.47 8.48 8.52 8.94 9.32 9.63 9.61 9.82 Federal and state SLCs n.a. 2.69 2.67 3.53 3.55 3.56 3.55 3.55 3.55 3.51
      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref98.pdf
        • 2.20 2.11 2.44 2.32 2.30 2.29 2.30 2.33 2.44 2.36 2.46 Total Connection Charge 49.25 47.55 46.60 47.26 47.15 45.57 45.01 44.92 44.46 43.58 43.70 43.68 Additional Charge if Drop Line and Connection Block Needed n.a. n.a. 6.04 6.07 6.89 6.89 6.50 7.29 6.74 5.90 5.74 5.65 Lowest-cost Inside Wiring Maintenance Plan 0.58 0.85 0.89 1.07 1.07 1.20 1.25 1.31 1.45 1.52 1.78 1.62 *Rate is based upon flat-rate service where available, and measured/message service with 100 five-minute, same-zone business-day calls elsewhere. 4 Table 1.3 Residential Telephone Rates in the Sample Cities (as of October 15, 1997) Monthly Telephone Rate including touch-tone, Cost of a five-minuteConnection Charges Least-cost Telephone surcharges, and taxes same-zone including touch-tone, inside wiring State City Company Flat-rateMeasured/Message
      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref99.pdf
        • 2.32 2.30 2.29 2.30 2.33 2.44 2.36 2.46 2.40 Total Connection Charge 49.25 47.55 46.60 47.26 47.15 45.57 45.01 44.92 44.46 43.58 43.70 43.67 43.83 Additional Charge if Drop Line and Connection Block Needed n.a. n.a. 6.04 6.07 6.89 6.89 6.50 7.29 6.74 5.90 5.74 5.65 5.64 Lowest-cost Inside Wiring Maintenance Plan 0.58 0.85 0.89 1.07 1.07 1.20 1.25 1.31 1.45 1.52 1.78 1.68 1.66 *Rate is based upon flat-rate service where available, and measured/message service with 100 five-minute, same-zone business-day calls elsewhere. 4 Table 1.3 Residential Telephone Rates in the Sample Cities (As of October 15, 1998) Monthly Telephone Rate including touch-tone, Cost of a five-minuteConnection Charges Least-cost Telephone surcharges, and taxes same-zone including touch-tone, inside wiring State City Company
      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ror96.pdf
        • CO.-KANSAS SWITCHED 13.70 10.53 17.82 16.27 13SOUTHWESTERN BELL TEL CO.-TOTAL CO. W/O KANSAS 12.32 12.09 12.76 12.28 43.25 12.19 12.43 14U.S. WEST COMMUNICATIONS, INC. 12.64 13.07 (7.78) 12.98 12.89 15MOUNTAIN STATE TELEPHONE AND TELEGRAPH COMPANY 12.26 14.22 16NORTHWESTERN BELL TELEPHONE COMPANY 12.03 14.71 17PACIFIC NORTHWEST BELL TELEPHONE COMPANY 12.30 9.41 18CENTRAL TELEPHONE COMPANY OF FLORIDA 13.96 12.20 13.51 23.17 (60.95) 1.45 16.86 19CENTRAL TELEPHONE COMPANY OF ILLINOIS 12.59 12.22 7.48 12.96 (220.04) 28.35 14.79 20CENTRAL TELEPHONE COMPANY OF OHIO 12.99 12.23 (0.53) 10.84 (161.00) 62.74 18.14 21CENTRAL TELEPHONE COMPANY OF TEXAS 12.52 12.20 23.65 7.41 1,706.94 46.37 11.83 22CENTRAL TELEPHONE COMPANY OF VIRGINIA 11.71 12.20 18.15 9.11 (733.36) 12.70 9.21 23CENTRAL TELEPHONE COMPANY - MINNESOTA 14.32 12.21 5.35 14.65 219.19 49.12
      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/strev-95.pdf
        • 1.49 DELAWARE 237 198 435 0.26 DC 372 409 781 0.47 FLORIDA 4,099 5,860 9,959 5.96 GEORGIA 2,085 2,884 4,968 2.97 HAWAII 269 424 694 0.42 IDAHO 321 329 650 0.39 ILLINOIS 2,701 4,408 7,109 4.26 INDIANA 1,177 2,070 3,248 1.94 IOWA 629 908 1,538 0.92 KANSAS 629 904 1,533 0.92 KENTUCKY 892 1,381 2,274 1.36 LOUISIANA 871 1,552 2,423 1.45 MAINE 302 439 740 0.44 MARYLAND 1,414 1,942 3,356 2.01 MASSACHUSETTS 1,804 2,594 4,399 2.63 MICHIGAN 1,776 3,949 5,725 3.43 MINNESOTA 1,075 1,557 2,632 1.58 MISSISSIPPI 529 872 1,401 0.84 MISSOURI 1,207 1,869 3,076 1.84 MONTANA 239 304 543 0.32 NEBRASKA 400 688 1,088 0.65 NEVADA 1,710 1,113 2,823 1.69 NEW HAMPSHIRE 421 419 840 0.50 NEW JERSEY 2,844 3,345
      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/strev-96.pdf
        • Misc. Rev. Basic and Basic and Misc Rev. Allocation Intrastate Local Interstate Local Total Local SOCC, 2.13 SOCC 2.13 Misc. Rev. SOCC Adjusted Percentage Exch., TRS Exch., TRS Exch., TRS (Millions) (Millions) (Millions) (Millions) (Millions) (Millions) (Millions) ALABAMA $822 $54 $876 $958 1.69 $1,002 $24 $1,026 ALASKA N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A ARIZONA 779 (7) 773 824 1.45 862 20 883 ARKANSAS 323 5 327 428 0.76 448 11 459 CALIFORNIA 5,362 253 5,615 5,703 10.06 5,965 141 6,107 COLORADO 841 134 975 1,019 1.80 1,066 25 1,091 CONNECTICUT 642 179 821 829 1.46 867 21 888 DELAWARE 133 2 135 135 0.24 141 3 145 DIST. OF COLUMBIA 301 57 358 358 0.63 374 9 383 FLORIDA
      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/strev-97.pdf
        • Monthly Monthly Monthly Payments Payments Contributions Less Payments Contributions Less (Thousands) (Thousands) Contributions Per Loop Per Loop Contributions (Thousands) Per Loop ALABAMA $38,913 $23,372 $15,542 $1.35 $0.81 $0.54 ALASKA 63,160 4,496 58,664 13.24 0.94 12.30 ARIZONA 30,274 34,154 (3,880) 0.92 1.04 (0.12) ARKANSAS 70,649 14,128 56,520 4.30 0.86 3.44 CALIFORNIA 52,395 163,902 (111,508) 0.20 0.64 (0.43) COLORADO 45,919 34,385 11,535 1.45 1.08 0.36 CONNECTICUT 1,403 28,269 (26,865) 0.05 1.09 (1.04) DELAWARE 0 6,668 (6,668) 0.00 1.04 (1.04) DIST. OF COLUMBIA 0 9,255 (9,255) 0.00 0.84 (0.84) FLORIDA 22,140 113,265 (91,125) 0.18 0.90 (0.72) GEORGIA 71,803 55,097 16,706 1.25 0.96 0.29 HAWAII 899 6,965 (6,067) 0.11 0.82 (0.71) IDAHO 28,564 8,676 19,888 3.50 1.06 2.43 ILLINOIS 22,723 74,076 (51,353) 0.24 0.77 (0.54)
      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend100.pdf
        • 2.30 2.33 2.44 2.36 2.46 2.38 2.52 Total Connection Charge 49.25 47.55 46.60 47.26 47.15 45.57 45.01 44.92 44.46 43.58 43.70 43.67 43.74 43.90 Additional Charge if Drop Line and Connection Block Needed n.a. n.a. 6.04 6.07 6.89 6.89 6.50 7.29 6.74 5.90 5.74 5.65 5.64 5.76 Lowest-cost Inside Wiring Maintenance Plan 0.58 0.85 0.89 1.07 1.07 1.20 1.25 1.31 1.45 1.52 1.78 1.68 2.22 2.65 ** Preliminary, subject to revision. TABLE 14.1 AVERAGE RESIDENTIAL RATES FOR LOCAL SERVICE IN URBAN AREAS, 1986-1999 (As of October 15) * Rate is based upon flat-rate service where available, and measured/message service with 100 five-minute, same-zone, business-day calls elsewhere. 14 - 3 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999** $31.06$30.97$32.29$32.45$32.70$32.25$32.48$32.58$32.76$32.44$32.22
      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend199.pdf
        • Atlantic 0.78 0.00 0.98 0.22 3.30 41,577 83,739 126,346 BellSouth 1.31 0.00 0.76 0.32 3.62 27,870 45,484 73,846 Pacific Telesis 0.01 0.00 0.72 0.48 2.46 12,793 26,255 39,054 SBC 0.00 0.00 0.88 0.27 2.36 15,773 25,814 42,030 U S WEST 0.43 0.00 1.01 0.65 3.85 21,351 34,436 55,908 GTE 1.99 0.94 0.93 0.27 5.53 18,388 29,819 48,834 Aliant 0.00 0.00 1.45 0.34 3.68 258 426 688 Frontier 1.15 0.23 1.27 0.40 4.89 735 1,659 2,396 SNET 0.24 0.00 1.29 0.28 3.48 3,178 5,095 8,276 Sprint Local 1.27 0.37 1.06 0.26 4.44 8,152 12,632 20,914 Citizens 2.79 1.32 1.85 0.42 8.98 1,077 1,431 2,520 Cincinnati Bell 0.47 0.00 0.83 0.17 2.56 1,111 1,799 2,912 All Price Caps 0.80 0.12 0.91 0.33 3.52
      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend200.pdf
        • 2.30 2.33 2.44 2.36 2.46 2.38 2.52 Total Connection Charge 49.25 47.55 46.60 47.26 47.15 45.57 45.01 44.92 44.46 43.58 43.70 43.67 43.74 43.88 Additional Charge if Drop Line and Connection Block Needed NA NA 6.04 6.07 6.89 6.89 6.50 7.29 6.74 5.90 5.74 5.65 5.64 5.76 Lowest-Cost Inside Wiring Maintenance Plan 0.58 0.85 0.89 1.07 1.07 1.20 1.25 1.31 1.45 1.52 1.78 1.68 2.22 2.65 NA - Not Available. Table 14.1 Average Residential Rates for Local Service in Urban Areas (As of October 15, 1986 - 1999) 1/ Rate is based upon flat-rate service where available, and measured/message service with 100 five-minute, same-zone, business-day calls elsewhere. 14 - 3 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999
      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend298.pdf
        • 18.4 INDUSTRY TELEPHONE REVENUE BY STATE FOR 1995 AND 1996 1995 1996 PERCENT CHANGE FROM 1995 TO 1996 REVENUEPERCENTREVENUEPERCENT (MILLIONS)OF TOTAL(MILLIONS)OF TOTAL ALABAMA $2,800 1.41% $3,097 1.39% 10.6% ALASKA 484 0.24 541 0.24 11.8 ARIZONA 2,948 1.48 3,380 1.52 14.6 ARKANSAS 1,567 0.79 1,754 0.79 12.0 CALIFORNIA 23,093 11.60 25,961 11.68 12.4 COLORADO 3,256 1.64 3,683 1.66 13.1 CONNECTICUT 2,878 1.45 3,075 1.38 6.8 DELAWARE 508 0.26 588 0.26 15.6 DIST. OF COLUMBIA 935 0.47 1,013 0.46 8.3 FLORIDA 11,994 6.02 13,488 6.07 12.5 GEORGIA 5,869 2.95 6,651 2.99 13.3 HAWAII 815 0.41 887 0.40 8.9 IDAHO 811 0.41 932 0.42 14.9 ILLINOIS 8,272 4.15 9,343 4.20 12.9 INDIANA 3,948 1.98 4,359 1.96 10.4 IOWA 1,939 0.97 2,104 0.95 8.5 KANSAS
      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend299.pdf
        • 2.32 2.30 2.29 2.30 2.33 2.44 2.36 2.46 2.40 Total Connection Charge 49.25 47.55 46.60 47.26 47.15 45.57 45.01 44.92 44.46 43.58 43.70 43.67 43.83 Additional Charge if Drop Line and Connection Block Needed n.a. n.a. 6.04 6.07 6.89 6.89 6.50 7.29 6.74 5.90 5.74 5.65 5.64 Lowest-cost Inside Wiring Maintenance Plan 0.58 0.85 0.89 1.07 1.07 1.20 1.25 1.31 1.45 1.52 1.78 1.68 1.66 *Rate is based upon flat-rate service where available, and measured/message service with 100 five-minute, same-zone business-day calls elsewhere. 14 - 3 Table 14.2 Average Local Rates for Businesses with a Single Line in Urban Areas (as of October 15, 1989-1998) 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 Monthly Representative Service Charge* $31.06$30.97$32.29$32.45 $32.70$32.25$32.48$32.58$32.76$32.44
      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend504.pdf
        • 0.24 1.49 1998 163.0 0.14 0.16 0.58 0.11 0.08 1959 29.1 0.24 1.50 1999 166.6 0.14 0.15 0.54 0.11 0.08 1960 29.6 0.24 1.47 2000 172.2 0.12 0.12 0.52 0.09 0.06 1961 29.9 0.25 1.50 2001 177.1 0.10 0.11 0.35 0.08 0.06 1962 30.2 0.25 1.51 2002 179.9 0.09 0.09 0.28 0.07 0.05 1963 30.6 0.25 1.46 1964 31.0 0.25 1.45 1965 31.5 0.24 1.37 1966 32.4 0.24 1.35 1967 33.4 0.24 1.31 1968 34.8 0.24 1.22 1969 36.7 0.24 1.18 Note: Data for some prior years have been revised. 1/ Billed revenue per minute for international service differs in Table 6.1 and Table 13.4. Data in Table 6.1 are calculated using all U.S. billed minutes and revenues. Data for Table
      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend605.pdf
        • 960 2,307 4,546 7,365 11,911 4.09 Indiana 1,494 2,706 4,201 614 469 1,083 2,109 3,175 5,284 1.81 Iowa 761 1,328 2,089 352 266 618 1,113 1,594 2,707 0.93 Kansas 715 1,229 1,944 345 181 526 1,059 1,410 2,470 0.85 Kentucky 966 1,967 2,933 412 266 678 1,378 2,233 3,611 1.24 Louisiana 1,103 2,339 3,442 457 325 783 1,560 2,664 4,224 1.45 Maine 368 706 1,074 179 104 283 548 809 1,357 0.47 Maryland 1,806 3,024 4,830 794 440 1,234 2,600 3,464 6,064 2.08 Massachusetts 1,946 3,637 5,583 897 493 1,390 2,843 4,130 6,973 2.40 Michigan 2,354 5,178 7,531 939 870 1,809 3,292 6,047 9,340 3.21 Minnesota 1,303 2,387 3,690 611 373 984 1,914 2,761 4,675 1.61 Mississippi 701 1,464 2,165 313
      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend803.pdf
        • 326 739 Qwest 0.00 0.00 0.53 0.15 1.41 20,509 37,988 58,539 SBC 0.00 0.00 0.44 0.17 1.25 71,493 76,858 149,482 Sprint 0.02 0.00 0.60 0.13 1.52 6,978 18,896 26,128 Valor 0.54 0.11 0.78 0.34 2.98 358 916 1,274 Verizon 0.02 0.00 0.42 0.23 1.35 53,826 128,385 182,882 Price Caps 0.01 0.00 0.44 0.20 1.33 183,968 325,891 506,268 NECA 0.20 0.20 1.45 0.83 5.08 11,755 21,652 18,521 All Price Caps and NECA 0.02 0.01 0.48 0.22 1.46 195,723 347,543 524,789 Source: Access tariff filings. 2 Non-traffic sensitive charges include charges assessed on a per-month, per-unit basis. Prior to 07/01/94 these charges were included in the average traffic-sensitive rates. 3 The total charge per conversation minute consists of charges on the originating end
      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Intl/itltrd98.pdf
        • Revenue Minutes PTT Revenue PTT Revenue PTT foreign receipts 1964 2/ 20 $63 $30 $33 12 $20 $3.11 $1.50 $1.62 $1.63 $1.62 1965 2/ 26 78 37 41 15 25 3.07 1.46 1.61 1.60 1.61 1966 2/ 32 100 48 53 19 30 3.10 1.47 1.63 1.59 1.61 1967 2/ 40 114 55 60 23 32 2.88 1.38 1.50 1.36 1.45 1968 46 127 62 65 28 40 2.73 1.33 1.41 1.42 1.41 1969 65 172 83 89 38 52 2.66 1.28 1.38 1.35 1.37 1970 81 197 99 98 51 60 2.43 1.22 1.21 1.17 1.19 1971 101 237 121 117 68 75 2.35 1.20 1.16 1.10 1.13 1972 127 292 148 144 92 99 2.31 1.17 1.14 1.08 1.11
      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Intl/itltrd99.pdf
        • Revenue Minutes PTT Revenue PTT Revenue PTT foreign receipts 1964 2/ 20 $63 $30 $33 12 $20 $3.11 $1.50 $1.62 $1.63 $1.62 1965 2/ 26 78 37 41 15 25 3.07 1.46 1.61 1.60 1.61 1966 2/ 32 100 48 53 19 30 3.10 1.47 1.63 1.59 1.61 1967 2/ 40 114 55 60 23 32 2.88 1.38 1.50 1.36 1.45 1968 46 127 62 65 28 40 2.73 1.33 1.41 1.42 1.41 1969 65 172 83 89 38 52 2.66 1.28 1.38 1.35 1.37 1970 81 197 99 98 51 60 2.43 1.22 1.21 1.17 1.19 1971 101 237 121 117 68 75 2.35 1.20 1.16 1.10 1.13 1972 127 292 148 144 92 99 2.31 1.17 1.14 1.08 1.11
      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Intl/itrnd00.pdf
        • PTT Revenues PTT Revenues PTT all U.S. and 4/ 5/ 4/ Foreign Minutes 1964 20.2 $62.9 $30.3 $32.6 12.0 $19.6 $3.11 $1.50 $1.62 $1.63 $1.62 1965 25.5 78.2 37.2 41.1 15.4 24.7 3.07 1.46 1.61 1.60 1.61 1966 32.3 100.1 47.6 52.5 18.9 30.1 3.10 1.47 1.63 1.59 1.61 1967 39.7 114.2 54.6 59.6 23.4 31.8 2.88 1.38 1.50 1.36 1.45 1968 46.4 126.9 61.5 65.4 28.2 40.0 2.73 1.33 1.41 1.42 1.41 1969 64.6 172.0 82.7 89.4 38.3 51.6 2.66 1.28 1.38 1.35 1.37 1970 81.1 196.6 98.9 97.7 51.0 59.8 2.43 1.22 1.21 1.17 1.19 1971 100.9 237.4 120.7 116.6 68.4 75.1 2.35 1.20 1.16 1.10 1.13 1972 126.5 291.8 148.2 143.6 91.7 98.6 2.31 1.17 1.14 1.08 1.11
      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Intl/itrnd01.pdf
        • Foreign for all U.S. 4/ Carriers Carriers 6/ Carriers Carriers and Foreign Minutes 1964 20.2 $62.9 $30.3 $32.6 12.0 $19.6 $3.11 $1.50 $1.62 $1.63 $1.62 1965 25.5 78.2 37.2 41.1 15.4 24.7 3.07 1.46 1.61 1.60 1.61 1966 32.3 100.1 47.6 52.5 18.9 30.1 3.10 1.47 1.63 1.59 1.61 1967 39.7 114.2 54.6 59.6 23.4 31.8 2.88 1.38 1.50 1.36 1.45 1968 46.4 126.9 61.5 65.4 28.2 40.0 2.73 1.33 1.41 1.42 1.41 1969 64.6 172.0 82.7 89.4 38.3 51.6 2.66 1.28 1.38 1.35 1.37 1970 81.1 196.6 98.9 97.7 51.0 59.8 2.43 1.22 1.21 1.17 1.19 1971 100.9 237.4 120.7 116.6 68.4 75.1 2.35 1.20 1.16 1.10 1.13 1972 126.5 291.8 148.2 143.6 91.7 98.6 2.31 1.17 1.14 1.08 1.11
      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr03-1.pdf
        • Excludes subscriber line charges. 2/ Totals in the first six columns include revenues for locations not estimated. (Dollars in Millions) 1 - 43 Table 1.17 General Information: 2001 1 2 3 Average PercentAdjustment Formula Reporting 2/100/Average Percent 2001 2001 Reporting Alabama 2,497,624 90.6% 1.10 Alaska 461,194 0.0 NA American Samoa 10,325 0.0 NA Arizona 3,095,149 93.4 1.07 Arkansas 1,509,333 68.9 1.45 California 23,385,691 98.4 1.02 Colorado 2,948,466 95.5 1.05 Connecticut 2,406,704 99.0 1.01 Delaware 589,979 100.0 1.00 District of Columbia 919,587 100.0 1.00 Florida 11,317,933 98.3 1.02 Georgia 5,148,317 89.0 1.12 Guam 74,006 0.0 NA Hawaii 721,233 99.9 1.00 Idaho 762,986 90.8 1.10 Illinois 8,012,870 95.0 1.05 Indiana 3,803,634 95.4 1.05 Iowa 1,704,785 64.9 1.54 Kansas 1,666,630 84.1 1.19 Kentucky 2,206,741
      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr03-11.pdf
        • - Frontier of Rochester NY 2,008 1,536 472 23.51 ALLTEL - Carolina NC (553) (397) (156) 28.21 Sprint - Centel of North Carolina NC (129) (106) (22) 17.05 Verizon - South - Contel - North Carolina NC (5,014) (5,001) (13) 0.26 Verizon - South - North Carolina NC (10,720) (10,712) (8) 0.07 BellSouth - North Carolina NC (6,431) (6,525) 93 (1.45) Sprint - Carolina Tel. & Tel. of North Carolina NC (544) (409) (135) 24.82 Qwest - North Dakota ND NA NA NA NA ALLTEL - Western Reserve - Ohio OH (357) (256) (101) 28.29 Cincinnati Bell Telephone Company - Ohio OH 5,602 5,602 (10) (0.18) Verizon - North - Ohio OH (1,057) (1,029) (28) 2.65 SBC - Ameritech - Ohio
      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr03-3.pdf
        • 1,035,885 341.29 22,468,908 2.133 Wisconsin 804,025,676 3,525,444 228.06 24,753,408 2.350 Wyoming 135,145,432 312,778 432.08 13,725,121 1.303 Industry 46,828,415,741185,588,578 252.321,053,370,391100.000 3 - 28 Table 3.18 High-Cost Loop Support Percentage Changes from 2000 to 2001 by Study Area Unseparated High Cost Unseparated Number NTS Revenue Loop Support NTS Revenue of Requirement Payments in Jurisdiction Requirement Loops per Loop Later Year* Alabama 6.87 -1.45 8.45 15.40 Alaska 3.24 1.14 2.07 2.32 American Samoa 27.70 3.48 23.40 INFINITE Arizona 3.24 -1.39 4.70 11.88 Arkansas 5.08 -2.49 7.76 18.30 California 7.83 -1.65 9.64 2.63 Colorado 1.06 -1.88 2.99 7.93 Connecticut 0.83 -5.72 6.94 0.00 Delaware 2.68 -1.49 4.23 0.00 District Of Columbia -0.22 -0.54 0.32 0.00 Florida 4.59 -1.46 6.14 10.47 Georgia 6.39 -2.60 9.23 -2.49
      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr03-7.pdf
        • 2.70 Total Connection Charge 49.25 47.55 46.60 47.26 47.15 45.57 45.01 44.92 44.46 43.58 43.70 43.67 43.74 43.95 44.10 42.95 42.39 Additional Charge If Drop Line and Connection Block Needed n.a. n.a. 6.04 6.07 6.89 6.89 6.50 7.29 6.74 5.90 5.74 5.65 5.64 5.86 5.84 5.84 5.85 Lowest-Cost Inside Wiring Maintenance Plan 0.58 0.85 0.89 1.07 1.07 1.20 1.25 1.31 1.45 1.52 1.78 1.68 2.22 2.66 3.03 3.62 3.61 n.a.: not available *Rate is based upon flat-rate service where available, and measured/message service with 100 five-minute, same-zone business-day calls elsewhere. Table 7.6 Average Residential Rates for Local Service in Urban Areas, 1986-2002 (As of October 15) 7 - 19 Table 7.7 Average Local Rates for Businesses with a Single Line in
      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr04-11.pdf
        • - Central PR 0 0 0 0.00 Verizon - Puerto Rico Telephone Company PR 0 0 0 0.00 Verizon - New England - Rhode Island RI 8,837 9,066 (229) (2.59) Verizon - South - Contel - South Carolina SC (1,340) (1,340) 0 0.00 Verizon - South Carolina SC (8,606) (8,600) (6) 0.07 BellSouth - South Carolina SC (14,390) (14,597) 208 (1.45) Qwest - South Dakota SD 4,917 5,032 (116) (2.36) BellSouth - Tennessee TN (18,188) (18,503) 315 (1.73) Sprint - UTC - Southeast - Tennessee TN (84) (66) (18) 21.43 Sprint - Centel of Texas TX (358) (295) (63) 17.60 Verizon - SW - Contel Texas TX (5,713) (5,709) (4) 0.07 Verizon - SW Texas TX (64,428) (64,252) (176) 0.27 SBC
      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr04-3.pdf
        • CO. 9.21 -4.61 14.49 18.60 351230 A NORTHEAST IOWA TEL. CO. 7.84 -1.71 9.72 34.60 351232 A LYNNVILLE TELEPHONE COMPANY 22.37 24.03 -1.34 5.00 351235 A MANILLA TEL. CO. 9.56 0.16 9.39 33.73 351237 A MARNE & ELK HORN TEL. CO. 3.29 -0.81 4.14 3.16 351238 A MARTELLE COOP. TEL. ASSN. 1.99 -1.13 3.16 -0.37 351239 A MASSENA TEL. CO. 1.45 -1.94 3.46 -0.25 351241 A MECHANICSVILLE TEL. CO. 7.69 -2.44 10.38 46.61 351242 A MILES COOP. TEL. ASSN. 9.93 0.25 9.65 39.47 351243 A MILLER TEL. CO.-IA -4.20 -2.83 -1.41 -12.16 351245 A MINBURN TEL. CO. 4.18 -2.46 6.81 12.97 351246 A MINERVA VALLEY TEL. CO., INC. 5.21 0.22 4.97 7.55 351247 A MODERN COOP. TEL. CO. -0.44 -1.65 1.23
      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr04-7.pdf
        • Connection Charge 49.25 47.55 46.60 47.26 47.15 45.57 45.01 44.92 44.46 43.58 43.70 43.67 43.74 43.95 44.10 42.95 41.16 40.76 Additional Charge If Drop Line and Connection Block Needed n.a. n.a. 6.04 6.07 6.89 6.89 6.50 7.29 6.74 5.90 5.74 5.65 5.64 5.86 5.84 5.84 5.85 5.85 Lowest-Cost Inside Wiring Maintenance Plan 0.58 0.85 0.89 1.07 1.07 1.20 1.25 1.31 1.45 1.52 1.78 1.68 2.22 2.66 3.03 3.62 3.62 3.64 n.a.: not available * Revised estimates. **Subject to revision. ***Rate is based upon flat-rate service where available, and measured/message service with 100 five-minute, same-zone business-day calls elsewhere. Beginning in 2001, all rates reflect flat-rate service. ****Beginning in 2002, additional monthly charges for touch-tone service are included in the monthly recurring rate.
      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr04-9.pdf
        • For Unscheduled Events Over 2 Minutes 23.0 60.8 2.6 0.0 51.7 7.5 210.4 25.3 396.5 For Unscheduled Downtime More Than 2 Minutes Number of Occurrences or Events 23 23 11 0 18 1 24 13 96 Events per Hundred Switches 1.4 1.7 0.8 0.0 1.1 0.6 1.9 1.0 3.1 Events per Million Access Lines 1.04 1.61 0.60 0.00 1.23 0.46 1.45 0.64 5.87 Average Outage Duration in Minutes 27.2 58.2 5.8 NA 79.3 20.0 188.8 43.3 216.6 Average Lines Affected per Event in Thousands 15.9 13.3 21.5 NA 24.1 25.7 25.9 27.8 2.9 Outage Line-Minutes per Event in Thousands 326.7 303.1 117.8 NA 475.7 513.0 5,044.0 812.0 289.1 Outage Line-Minutes per 1,000 Access Lines 338.4 488.3 70.7 0.0 583.7 236.1 7,311.7
      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr97-5.pdf
        • 1.85 2.00 2.03 2.17 2.24 2.34 2.34 Total 11.5813.3514.5416.1316.6616.5717.5317.7918.6618.7018.9419.0719.5019.58 Lowest Generally Available Monthly Rate 5.37 5.62 5.75 5.96 5.81 5.67 5.67 5.68 6.18 6.22 6.43 6.47 6.68 7.06 Subscriber Line Charges * 0.00 0.00 1.01 2.04 2.66 2.67 3.53 3.55 3.56 3.55 3.55 3.55 3.54 3.54 Taxes, including 911 charges 0.56 0.58 0.70 0.84 0.94 0.91 1.03 1.15 1.28 1.31 1.45 1.50 1.56 1.62 Total 5.93 6.20 7.46 8.84 9.41 9.2510.2310.3811.0211.0811.4311.5211.7812.22 Connection Charge 35.0143.7144.3245.6344.0442.9442.7143.0642.0041.5241.3841.2640.9141.08 Taxes 1.75 2.19 2.22 2.28 2.20 2.11 2.24 2.32 2.19 2.18 2.21 2.27 2.42 2.35 Total 36.7645.9046.5447.9146.2445.0544.9545.3844.1943.7043.5943.5343.3343.42 * Includes both Federal and State subscriber line charges. $0 $5 $10 $15 $20 1983 1984 1985 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 Monthly Service
      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrj99-7.pdf
        • 2.32 2.30 2.29 2.30 2.33 2.44 2.36 2.46 2.40 Total Connection Charge 49.25 47.55 46.60 47.26 47.15 45.57 45.01 44.92 44.46 43.58 43.70 43.67 43.83 Additional Charge if Drop Line and Connection Block Needed n.a. n.a. 6.04 6.07 6.89 6.89 6.50 7.29 6.74 5.90 5.74 5.65 5.64 Lowest-cost Inside Wiring Maintenance Plan 0.58 0.85 0.89 1.07 1.07 1.20 1.25 1.31 1.45 1.52 1.78 1.68 1.66 *Rate is based upon flat-rate service where available, and measured/message service with 100 five-minute, same-zone business-day calls elsewhere. 7 - 19 Table 7.8 Average Local Rates for Businesses with a Single Line in Urban Areas 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 Monthly Representative Service Charge* $31.06 $30.97 $32.29 $32.45 $32.70 $32.25 $32.48
      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrs00-0.pdf
        • 2.30 2.33 2.44 2.36 2.46 2.38 2.52 Total Connection Charge 49.25 47.55 46.60 47.26 47.15 45.57 45.01 44.92 44.46 43.58 43.70 43.67 43.74 43.88 Additional Charge if Drop Line and Connection Block Needed n.a. n.a. 6.04 6.07 6.89 6.89 6.50 7.29 6.74 5.90 5.74 5.65 5.64 5.76 Lowest-cost Inside Wiring Maintenance Plan 0.58 0.85 0.89 1.07 1.07 1.20 1.25 1.31 1.45 1.52 1.78 1.68 2.22 2.65 *Rate is based upon flat-rate service where available, and measured/message service with 100 five-minute, same-zone business-day calls elsewhere. 7 - 20 Table 7.8 Average Local Rates for Businesses with a Single Line in Urban Areas 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 Monthly Representative Service Charge* $31.06$30.97$32.29$32.45$32.70$32.25$32.48$32.58$32.76$32.44$32.22 Subscriber Line Charges 3.55
      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrs01-0.pdf
        • CO., INC.-IN 17.86 22.97 -4.16 -76.07 320832 C UNITED TEL. CO. OF INDIANA, INC. -1.67 7.14 -8.22 0.00 320834 A WASH. CTY. RURAL TEL. COOP., INC. 13.45 6.12 6.90 0.00 320837 A WEST POINT TEL. CO., INC. 9.01 2.61 6.24 53.13 320839 A YEOMAN TEL. CO., INC. -4.70 0.40 -5.07 -100.00 323034 C CONTEL SO. DBA GTE SO.-IN (FORMERLY ALLTEL) -1.45 1.13 -2.55 0.00 325080 C INDIANA BELL TEL. CO. 3.09 1.85 1.21 0.00 TOTAL: IOWA -1.21 2.22 -3.36 49.61 351096A>CAMANA COLONIES TEL. CO. -56.80 -3.49 -55.24 -100.00 351097 A ANDREW TEL. CO., INC. 12.86 0.27 12.55 76.09 351098 A ARCADIA TEL. COOP. 16.09 2.99 12.73 79.89 351101 A ATKINS TEL. CO. 10.68 3.99 6.44 55.24 351105 C AYRSHIRE FMRS. MUT.
      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrs02-0.pdf
        • 4,344 240 Georgia 2,536 3.72 2,421 8 2,655 147 Guam NA NA NA NA NA NA Hawaii 286 0.42 273 1 300 17 Idaho 273 0.40 260 1 285 16 Illinois 3,285 4.82 3,136 10 3,439 190 Indiana 1,300 1.91 1,241 4 1,362 75 Iowa 469 0.69 448 1 491 27 Kansas 631 0.93 602 2 660 37 Kentucky 991 1.45 946 3 1,037 57 Louisiana 1,253 1.84 1,196 4 1,312 73 Maine 285 0.42 272 1 299 17 Maryland 1,412 2.07 1,348 4 1,479 82 Massachusetts 1,500 2.20 1,432 5 1,571 87 Michigan 2,120 3.11 2,024 7 2,220 123 Minnesota 1,118 1.64 1,068 4 1,171 65 Mississippi 837 1.23 799 3 877 49 Missouri 1,373 2.02 1,311 4 1,438 80
      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/SOCC/00socc.pdf
        • Brazil 2.50 2.50 1.60 1.50 1.40 1.27 1.14 1.03 0.85 0.65 0.60 0.38 0.38 Canada 10/ 0.42 0.28 0.28 0.28 0.28 0.26 0.24 0.22 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.20 China 3.43 3.72 3.48 3.37 2.93 2.91 2.67 2.13 1.69 1.40 1.01 0.72 0.70 Colombia 1.85 1.75 1.60 1.55 1.50 1.40 1.30 1.25 1.00 0.80 0.65 0.55 0.38 Dominican Republic 10/ 1.45 1.42 1.39 1.36 1.29 1.30 1.10 0.90 0.70 0.60 0.38 0.38 0.38 Egypt 1.95 1.90 1.80 1.70 1.60 1.50 1.40 1.40 1.30 1.30 1.10 0.70 0.46 El Salvador 1.50 1.50 1.40 1.30 1.25 1.20 1.20 1.10 0.88 0.77 0.60 0.48 0.38 France 10/ 1.58 1.71 1.43 0.96 0.97 0.62 0.54 0.35 0.26 0.21 0.21 0.19 0.19 Germany 1.58 1.71 1.43
      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/SOCC/01socc.pdf
        • 0.38 0.38 France 10/ 1.71 1.43 0.96 0.97 0.62 0.54 0.35 0.26 0.21 0.21 0.19 0.19 0.19 Germany 1.71 1.43 1.10 0.83 0.51 0.39 0.23 0.20 0.21 0.21 0.19 0.19 0.19 Greece 2.32 2.19 1.66 1.55 1.41 1.26 1.01 0.86 0.55 0.30 0.25 0.26 0.25 Guatemala 1.50 1.50 1.40 1.30 1.20 1.18 1.00 0.90 0.77 0.64 0.51 0.38 0.38 Haiti 1.45 1.40 1.35 1.30 1.25 1.20 1.20 1.20 1.20 1.00 0.92 0.70 0.70 Hong Kong 2.20 1.90 1.60 1.20 1.00 1.00 0.94 0.79 0.72 0.14 0.13 0.13 0.13 India 2.25 2.25 2.00 1.90 1.80 1.80 1.60 1.42 1.28 1.08 0.85 0.85 0.85 Israel 10/ 2.40 2.40 2.28 2.16 2.16 1.90 1.18 0.70 0.59 0.30 0.30 0.30 0.30 Italy 2.14 2.04 1.65
      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/SOCC/02socc.pdf
        • 0.60 0.38 0.38 0.38 Japan 8/ 9/ 1.62 1.31 1.04 0.94 0.94 0.91 0.86 0.29 0.29 0.27 0.27 0.28 0.29 Korea, Rep. 8/ 9/ 1.90 1.60 1.44 1.41 1.26 1.23 0.98 0.85 0.71 0.51 0.38 0.38 0.38 Mexico 8/ 10/ 0.75 0.72 0.68 0.58 0.53 0.49 0.40 0.37 0.19 0.19 0.19 0.19 0.19 Morocco 9/ 3.58 3.03 3.04 3.27 1.78 1.45 1.09 0.83 0.82 0.77 0.38 0.40 0.41 Netherlands 9/ 1.29 0.69 0.69 0.59 0.37 0.36 0.27 0.19 0.14 0.13 0.13 0.13 0.14 Nigeria 9/ 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.40 1.15 0.77 0.51 0.40 0.41 Pakistan 2.30 2.30 2.30 2.30 2.30 2.20 2.00 1.20 1.20 0.84 0.54 0.42 0.42 Peru 9/ 2.00 1.50 1.40 1.30 1.30 1.23 1.00
      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/SOCC/03socc.pdf
        • 2.16 2.16 1.90 1.18 0.70 0.59 Italy 1.65 1.51 1.22 0.71 0.52 0.33 Jamaica 1.55 1.50 1.40 1.40 1.30 1.25 1.25 1.05 0.60 Japan 1.31 1.04 0.94 0.94 0.91 0.86 Korea, Rep. 1.60 1.44 1.41 1.26 1.23 0.98 0.85 0.71 0.51 Mexico 7/ 0.72 0.68 0.58 0.53 0.485 0.395 0.37 0.19 0.19 0.19 0.19 0.19 Morocco 3.03 3.04 3.27 1.78 1.45 1.09 0.83 0.82 0.77 0.38 Netherlands 0.69 0.69 0.59 0.37 0.36 0.27 Nigeria 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.40 1.15 0.77 0.51 Pakistan 2.30 2.30 2.30 2.30 2.20 2.00 1.20 1.20 0.84 0.54 0.42 0.42 Peru 1.50 1.40 1.30 1.30 1.23 1.00 0.85 0.66 0.50 0.38 Philippines 1.68 1.68 1.34 1.23 1.00 1.00 0.72 0.57 Poland 1.30 1.25 1.20
      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/SOCC/95socc.pdf
        • 5.5 161.4 57.0 91.9 12.6 161.4 NH NEW JERSEY 1,008.7 1.56 1,007.1 145.3 861.9 403.9 321.6 135.2 860.7 1.174 NJ NEW MEXICO 186.5 3.04 183.4 33.9 149.5 63.6 69.1 16.9 149.5 NM NEW YORK 2,443.8 11.13 2,432.7 332.3 2,100.4 826.6 1,012.9 260.9 2,100.4 NY NORTH CAROLINA 856.1 0.89 855.2 298.0 557.2 295.1 182.0 79.1 556.1 1.076 NC NORTH DAKOTA 64.5 (1.45) 66.0 19.6 46.4 18.7 19.8 7.8 46.4 ND OHIO 1,127.2 (1.39) 1,128.6 350.5 778.1 378.9 287.3 111.1 777.4 0.705 OH OKLAHOMA 276.2 (3.44) 279.7 47.2 232.5 114.1 83.0 35.4 232.5 OK OREGON 385.9 (3.24) 389.2 98.0 291.2 127.7 129.2 34.3 291.2 OR PENNSYLVANIA 1,288.8 (2.42) 1,291.2 310.6 907.2 466.4 309.6 129.0 904.9 2.271 PA RHODE ISLAND 114.0 0.03 114.0 1.2
      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/SOCC/96socc.pdf
        • (4.15) 3.8 ID ILLINOIS 412.5 289.4 123.1 99.9 23.2 (3.40) 0.64 0.58 (2.18) 25.4 IL INDIANA 224.9 161.9 63.1 47.1 16.0 1.59 0.79 0.82 3.21 12.8 IN IOWA 19.3 28.8 (9.6) (8.2) (1.4) (2.92) (1.99) (1.87) (6.78) 5.4 IA KANSAS 68.5 57.4 11.1 5.7 5.4 0.01 0.09 0.14 0.24 5.2 KS KENTUCKY 98.3 42.1 56.2 49.2 7.0 1.04 0.17 0.25 1.45 5.5 KY LOUISIANA 129.7 39.8 89.9 85.9 4.0 (1.16) 0.00 (0.17) (1.32) 5.3 LA MAINE 31.3 4.1 27.2 22.8 4.3 0.50 (0.08) 0.04 0.46 3.9 ME MARYLAND 324.8 239.1 85.7 60.0 25.7 5.25 2.31 2.82 10.38 15.3 MD MASSACHUSETTS 292.1 54.6 237.5 205.7 31.8 2.86 2.73 1.97 7.56 24.3 MA MICHIGAN 253.6 177.8 75.8 60.9 14.9 (2.34) 0.07 0.28 (1.99)
      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/SOCC/97socc.pdf
        • 0.06 0.21 4.6 RI SOUTH CAROLINA 43.6 0.7 21.8 18.9 2.9 (1.43) (0.73) (0.28) (2.44) 5.3 SC SOUTH DAKOTA (2.5) (0.0) (3.7) (2.9) (0.7) (0.97) (0.61) (0.62) (2.19) 1.5 SD TENNESSEE 66.2 0.0 50.0 33.8 16.2 (0.63) 0.23 0.16 (0.24) 16.4 TN TEXAS 284.0 65.7 138.6 99.3 39.3 0.34 0.13 1.79 2.26 37.0 TX UTAH 33.4 (0.0) 26.7 17.9 8.8 1.45 1.16 1.05 3.66 5.1 UT VERMONT 13.0 0.1 9.5 6.9 2.6 0.36 0.08 0.08 0.51 2.1 VT VIRGINIA 147.3 1.4 134.1 101.8 32.3 4.89 0.96 1.86 7.71 24.6 VA WASHINGTON 95.4 (1.4) 72.1 59.1 13.0 (2.10) (0.80) (0.16) (3.06) 16.1WA WEST VIRGINIA 21.6 (0.1) 17.4 12.3 5.1 0.77 0.13 0.22 1.12 4.0WV WISCONSIN 62.8 0.0 34.0 24.0 10.0 0.38 (0.10)
      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/SOCC/98SOCC.PDF
        • (1.03) 1.3 ND OHIO 467.5 370.2 97.3 66.0 31.3 0.91 0.83 0.53 2.27 29.0 OH OKLAHOMA 126.3 121.1 5.3 (4.7) 10.0 (0.31) (0.11) 0.03 (0.39) 10.4 OK OREGON 94.0 64.8 29.2 21.1 8.0 (0.94) (0.57) (0.26) (1.77) 9.8 OR PENNSYLVANIA 435.7 228.9 188.2 119.0 69.2 8.08 3.25 3.49 14.82 54.4 PA RHODE ISLAND 78.3 78.0 0.2 (1.5) 1.7 (4.99) (2.10) (1.45) (8.53) 10.3 RI SOUTH CAROLINA 40.4 16.2 24.2 17.0 7.3 0.34 0.09 0.16 0.59 6.7 SC SOUTH DAKOTA 93.9 57.8 36.2 27.2 9.0 1.07 0.81 0.44 2.32 6.7 SD TENNESSEE 5.5 6.2 (0.7) (0.7) (0.0) (0.72) (0.30) (0.29) (1.31) 1.3 TN TEXAS 164.0 99.3 64.7 45.3 19.4 1.04 0.53 0.40 1.97 17.4 TX UTAH 992.5 808.3 184.2 121.8 62.4 0.09
      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/SOCC/99socc.pdf
        • 6,639.7 6,257.3 166.6 207 STATISTICS OF COMMUNICATIONS COMMON CARRIERS Table 4.11 - Selected Economic Indicators, 1950-1999 -- Continued (Dollar Amounts Shown in Billions) Index Corporate Profits 2/ New Plant Corporate Prime of and Bond Yields Commercial Industrial Before After Equipment (Moody's) Paper, Year Production Taxes Taxes Expenditures 3/ Aaa 6-Month 4/ (1992=100) (%) (%) 1950 24.7 $43.2 $25.3 $21.56 2.62 1.45 1951 26.8 44.8 22.2 26.81 2.86 2.16 1952 27.8 40.2 20.8 28.16 2.96 2.33 1953 30.2 41.7 21.4 29.96 3.20 2.52 1954 28.6 39.3 21.7 28.86 2.90 1.58 1955 32.2 49.9 27.8 30.94 3.06 2.18 1956 33.6 50.5 28.5 37.90 3.36 3.31 1957 34.1 49.1 27.7 40.54 3.89 3.81 1958 31.9 43.0 24.0 33.84 3.79 2.46 1959 35.7 53.7 30.0
      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/SOCC/prelim02socc.pdf
        • 0.60 0.38 0.38 0.38 Japan 8/ 10/ 1.62 1.31 1.04 0.94 0.94 0.91 0.86 0.29 0.29 0.27 0.27 0.28 0.29 Korea, Rep. 8/ 10/ 1.90 1.60 1.44 1.41 1.26 1.23 0.98 0.85 0.71 0.51 0.38 0.38 0.38 Mexico 8/ 9/ 0.75 0.72 0.68 0.58 0.53 0.49 0.40 0.37 0.19 0.19 0.19 0.19 0.19 Morocco 10/ 3.58 3.03 3.04 3.27 1.78 1.45 1.09 0.83 0.82 0.77 0.38 0.40 0.41 Netherlands 10/ 1.29 0.69 0.69 0.59 0.37 0.36 0.27 0.19 0.14 0.13 0.13 0.13 0.14 Nigeria 10/ 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.40 1.15 0.77 0.51 0.40 0.41 Pakistan 2.30 2.30 2.30 2.30 2.30 2.20 2.00 1.20 1.20 0.84 0.54 0.42 0.42 Peru 10/ 2.00 1.50 1.40 1.30 1.30 1.23 1.00
      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/scard97.pdf
        • AT&T Corp. 0.05 1,866 39,264 Frontier Communications International 0.25 396 1,563 LCI International Worldwide Telecommunications 0.13 145 1,103 Long Distance Services, Inc. (Michigan) 4.06 442 109 MCI Telecommunications Corporation 0.07 1,162 16,372 Sprint Communications Company, L. P. 0.09 750 7,944 WorldCom, Inc. 0.12 528 4,485 Resellers1 Atlas Communications 1.64 179 109 Brittan Communications Inc. 2.11 230 109 Eastern Telecommunications, Inc. 1.45 158 109 Equal Net Corporation 8.72 530 61 Excel Telecommunications, Inc. 0.18 200 1,091 Future Telephone Communications 1.02 111 109 Great Lakes Telecommunications Corporation 1.53 167 109 Heartline Communications, Inc. 8.72 951 109 Home Owners Long Distance 1.27 138 109 Integrated Tele Services 1.28 139 109 L.D. Services, Inc. 2.38 259 109 LDM Systems Inc. 8.59 245 29 Long Distance
      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Orders/1997/fcc97303.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Orders/1997/fcc97303.txt http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Orders/1997/fcc97303.wp
        • Requests for Relief 149. We seek comment on the following proposed procedures for reviewing requests for relief filed under Section 332(c)(7)(B)(v) of the Communications Act. We propose that parties seeking relief file a request for declaratory ruling pursuant to Section 1.2 of the Commission's Rules, asking that the Commission review the state or local regulation and grant appropriate relief.207 Sections 1.45 through 1.49 of the Commission's Rules, concerning the filing of pleadings and responsive pleadings, shall be applicable with respect to such 207See 47 C.F.R. � 1.2. 63 Federal Communications Commission FCC 97-303 requests.208 We propose that a copy of the request be served on the state or local authority that took the action or failed to take the action against
      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/International/Orders/1999/da992172.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/International/Orders/1999/da992172.txt
        • late date of the Stay Motion, has permitted us to consider, prior to discontinuance, the pleadings filed by both parties. See Letter from Kathryn Schatz Koles, Division Counsel, AT&T to Magalie Roman Salas, Secretary, FCC, dated October 8, 1999. Order at � 19. Id. at � 8. Id. at �� 9-11. Id. at �� 12-14. Id. at � 17. Section 1.45(d) of the Commission's rules provides that ``[r]eplies to oppositions [to a request for stay] should not be filed and will not be considered.'' 47 C.F.R. � 1.45(d). Accordingly, we have not considered any arguments presented in this pleading. Virginia Petroleum Jobbers Ass'n v. FPC, 259 F.2d 921, 925 (D.C. Cir. 1958). Stay Motion at 6. See Order at � 6
      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/International/Orders/1999/fcc99073.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/International/Orders/1999/fcc99073.txt http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/International/Orders/1999/fcc99073.wp
        • have been filed, and (2) The International Bureau has not notified the carrier that grant of the modification request may not serve the public interest and that implementation of the proposed modification must await formal staff action on the modification request. If objections or comments are filed, the carrier requesting the modification request may file a response pursuant to � 1.45 of this chapter. Modification requests that are formally opposed must await formal action by the International Bureau before the proposed modification can be implemented. 12. Section 64.1002 is removed. Section 64.1002 Alternative settlement arrangements. [Removed] Federal Communications Commission FCC 99-73 45 Appendix B Commenting Parties Parties filing comments AT&T Ameritech Bell Atlantic BellSouth BT North America Cable & Wireless USA,
      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/International/Public_Notices/1998/pnin8236.pdf
        • Joanna Lowry, Telecommunications Division, International Bureau, (202) 418-1470. Interested parties may file comments with respect to this notification within 14 days of the date of this public notice (see Section 1.4(b)(4)). The notifying carrier may respond within 10 days after any such pleadings are filed, and the parties that filed such pleadings may reply within 5 days. See Section 63.52(c), 1.45(c)-(j). It is requested that such comments refer to the notification file number shown above. A copy of the notification is available for public inspection in Room 102, 2000 M Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20554. Page 1 of 1
      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/International/Public_Notices/1998/pnin8301.pdf
        • Joanna Lowry, Telecommunications Division, International Bureau, (202) 418-1470. Interested parties may file comments with respect to this notification within 14 days of the date of this public notice (see Section 1.4(b)(4)). The notifying carrier may respond within 10 days after any such pleadings are filed, and the parties that filed such pleadings may reply within 5 days. See Section 63.52(c), 1.45(c)-(j). It is requested that such comments refer to the notification file number shown above. A copy of the notification is available for public inspection in Room 102, 2000 M Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20554. Page 1 of 1
      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/International/Public_Notices/1999/pnin9199.pdf
        • Telecommunications Division, International Bureau, (202) 418-1470; TTY: 418-2555. Interested parties may file comments with respect to this notification within 14 days of the date of this public notice (see Section 1.4(b)(4)). The notifying carrier may respond within 10 days after any such pleadings are filed, and the parties that filed such pleadings may reply within 5 days. See Section 63.52(c), 1.45(c)-(j). It is requested that such comments refer to the notification file number shown above. A copy of the notification is available for public inspection in Room 102, 2000 M Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20554. Page 2 of 2
      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/International/Public_Notices/1999/pnin9200.pdf
        • Telecommunications Division, International Bureau, (202) 418-1470; TTY: 418-2555. Interested parties may file comments with respect to this notification within 14 days of the date of this public notice (see Section 1.4(b)(4)). The notifying carrier may respond within 10 days after any such pleadings are filed, and the parties that filed such pleadings may reply within 5 days. See Section 63.52(c), 1.45(c)-(j). It is requested that such comments refer to the notification file number shown above. A copy of the notification is available for public inspection in the Reference Information Center, Court Yard Level, 445 12th Street S.W., Washington, D.C. 20554. Page 1 of 1
      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/International/Public_Notices/2000/da001104.pdf
        • Telecommunications Division, International Bureau, (202) 418-1460; TTY: 418-2555. Interested parties may file comments with respect to this notification within 14 days of the date of this public notice (see Section 1.4(b)(4)). The notifying carrier may respond within 10 days after any such pleadings are filed, and the parties that filed such pleadings may reply within 5 days. See Section 63.52(c), 1.45(c)-(j). It is requested that such comments refer to the notification file number shown above. A copy of the notification is available for public inspection in the Reference Information Center, Court Yard Level, 445 12th Street, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20554. Page 1 of 1
      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/International/Public_Notices/2000/da001158.pdf
        • Telecommunications Division, International Bureau, (202) 418-1460; TTY: 418-2555. Interested parties may file comments with respect to this notification within 14 days of the date of this public notice (see Section 1.4(b)(4)). The notifying carrier may respond within 10 days after any such pleadings are filed, and the parties that filed such pleadings may reply within 5 days. See Section 63.52(c), 1.45(c)-(j). It is requested that such comments refer to the notification file number shown above. A copy of the notification is available for public inspection in the Reference Information Center, Court Yard Level, 445 12th Street, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20554. Page 2 of 2
      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/International/Public_Notices/2000/da001313.pdf
        • Telecommunications Division, International Bureau, (202) 418-1460; TTY: 418-2555. Interested parties may file comments with respect to this notification within 14 days of the date of this public notice (see Section 1.4(b)(4)). The notifying carrier may respond within 10 days after any such pleadings are filed, and the parties that filed such pleadings may reply within 5 days. See Section 63.52(c), 1.45(c)-(j). It is requested that such comments refer to the notification file number shown above. A copy of the notification is available for public inspection in the Reference Information Center, Court Yard Level, 445 12th Street, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20554. Page 1 of 1
      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/International/Public_Notices/2000/da001562.pdf
        • Telecommunications Division, International Bureau, (202) 418-1460; TTY: 418-2555. Interested parties may file comments with respect to this notification within 14 days of the date of this public notice (see Section 1.4(b)(4)). The notifying carrier may respond within 10 days after any such pleadings are filed, and the parties that filed such pleadings may reply within 5 days. See Section 63.52(c), 1.45(c)-(j). It is requested that such comments refer to the notification file number shown above. A copy of the notification is available for public inspection in the Reference Information Center, Court Yard Level, 445 12th Street, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20554. Page 1 of 1
      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/International/Public_Notices/2000/da001659.pdf
        • Telecommunications Division, International Bureau, (202) 418-1460; TTY: 418-2555. Interested parties may file comments with respect to this notification within 14 days of the date of this public notice (see Section 1.4(b)(4)). The notifying carrier may respond within 10 days after any such pleadings are filed, and the parties that filed such pleadings may reply within 5 days. See Section 63.52(c), 1.45(c)-(j). It is requested that such comments refer to the notification file number shown above. A copy of the notification is available for public inspection in the Reference Information Center, Court Yard Level, 445 12th Street, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20554. Page 1 of 1
      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/International/Public_Notices/2000/da001809.pdf
        • Telecommunications Division, International Bureau, (202) 418-1460; TTY: 418-2555. Interested parties may file comments with respect to this notification within 14 days of the date of this public notice (see Section 1.4(b)(4)). The notifying carrier may respond within 10 days after any such pleadings are filed, and the parties that filed such pleadings may reply within 5 days. See Section 63.52(c), 1.45(c)-(j). It is requested that such comments refer to the notification file number shown above. A copy of the notification is available for public inspection in the Reference Information Center, Court Yard Level, 445 12th Street, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20554. Page 1 of 1
      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/International/Public_Notices/2000/da001945.pdf
        • Telecommunications Division, International Bureau, (202) 418-1460; TTY: 418-2555. Interested parties may file comments with respect to this notification within 14 days of the date of this public notice (see Section 1.4(b)(4)). The notifying carrier may respond within 10 days after any such pleadings are filed, and the parties that filed such pleadings may reply within 5 days. See Section 63.52(c), 1.45(c)-(j). It is requested that such comments refer to the notification file number shown above. A copy of the notification is available for public inspection in the Reference Information Center, Court Yard Level, 445 12th Street, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20554. Page 1 of 1
      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/International/Public_Notices/2000/da002220.pdf
        • Telecommunications Division, International Bureau, (202) 418-1460; TTY: 418-2555. Interested parties may file comments with respect to this notification within 14 days of the date of this public notice (see Section 1.4(b)(4)). The notifying carrier may respond within 10 days after any such pleadings are filed, and the parties that filed such pleadings may reply within 5 days. See Section 63.52(c), 1.45(c)-(j). It is requested that such comments refer to the notification file number shown above. A copy of the notification is available for public inspection in the Reference Information Center, Court Yard Level, 445 12th Street, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20554. Page 2 of 2
      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/International/Public_Notices/2000/da002283.pdf
        • Telecommunications Division, International Bureau, (202) 418-1460; TTY: 418-2555. Interested parties may file comments with respect to this notification within 14 days of the date of this public notice (see Section 1.4(b)(4)). The notifying carrier may respond within 10 days after any such pleadings are filed, and the parties that filed such pleadings may reply within 5 days. See Section 63.52(c), 1.45(c)-(j). It is requested that such comments refer to the notification file number shown above. A copy of the notification is available for public inspection in the Reference Information Center, Court Yard Level, 445 12th Street, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20554. Page 1 of 1
      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/International/Public_Notices/2000/da002365.pdf
        • Telecommunications Division, International Bureau, (202) 418-1460; TTY: 418-2555. Interested parties may file comments with respect to this notification within 14 days of the date of this public notice (see Section 1.4(b)(4)). The notifying carrier may respond within 10 days after any such pleadings are filed, and the parties that filed such pleadings may reply within 5 days. See Section 63.52(c), 1.45(c)-(j). It is requested that such comments refer to the notification file number shown above. A copy of the notification is available for public inspection in the Reference Information Center, Court Yard Level, 445 12th Street, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20554. Page 1 of 1
      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/International/Public_Notices/2000/da002412.pdf
        • Telecommunications Division, International Bureau, (202) 418-1460; TTY: 418-2555. Interested parties may file comments with respect to this notification within 14 days of the date of this public notice (see Section 1.4(b)(4)). The notifying carrier may respond within 10 days after any such pleadings are filed, and the parties that filed such pleadings may reply within 5 days. See Section 63.52(c), 1.45(c)-(j). It is requested that such comments refer to the notification file number shown above. A copy of the notification is available for public inspection in the Reference Information Center, Court Yard Level, 445 12th Street, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20554. Page 1 of 1
      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/International/Public_Notices/2000/pnin0028.pdf
        • Telecommunications Division, International Bureau, (202) 418-1470; TTY: 418-2555. Interested parties may file comments with respect to this notification within 14 days of the date of this public notice (see Section 1.4(b)(4)). The notifying carrier may respond within 10 days after any such pleadings are filed, and the parties that filed such pleadings may reply within 5 days. See Section 63.52(c), 1.45(c)-(j). It is requested that such comments refer to the notification file number shown above. A copy of the notification is available for public inspection in the Reference Information Center, Court Yard Level, 445 12th Street, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20554. Page 1 of 1
      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/International/Public_Notices/2000/pnin0029.doc
        • Public Notice to read as follows: Interested parties may file comments with respect to this notification within 14 days of the date of this public notice (see Section 1.4(b)(4)). The notifying carrier may respond with 8 days after any such pleadings are filed, and the parties that filed such pleadings may reply within 2 days. See Section 63.52(c) and Section 1.45. It is requested that such comments refer to the notification file number shown above. A copy of the notification is available for public inspection in the Reference Information Center, Court Yard Level, 445 12th Street, S.W., Washington, DC 20554. For additional information concerning this matter, contact Lisa Choi, Telecommunications Division, International Bureau, (202) 418-1460; TTY: 418-2555. -- FCC -- g
      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/International/Public_Notices/2000/pnin0048.pdf
        • Telecommunications Division, International Bureau, (202) 418-1470; TTY: 418-2555. Interested parties may file comments with respect to this notification within 14 days of the date of this public notice (see Section 1.4(b)(4)). The notifying carrier may respond within 10 days after any such pleadings are filed, and the parties that filed such pleadings may reply within 5 days. See Section 63.52(c), 1.45(c)-(j). It is requested that such comments refer to the notification file number shown above. A copy of the notification is available for public inspection in the Reference Information Center, Court Yard Level, 445 12th Street, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20554. Page 2 of 2
      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/International/Public_Notices/2000/pnin0062.pdf
        • Telecommunications Division, International Bureau, (202) 418-1470; TTY: 418-2555. Interested parties may file comments with respect to this notification within 14 days of the date of this public notice (see Section 1.4(b)(4)). The notifying carrier may respond within 10 days after any such pleadings are filed, and the parties that filed such pleadings may reply within 5 days. See Section 63.52(c), 1.45(c)-(j). It is requested that such comments refer to the notification file number shown above. A copy of the notification is available for public inspection in the Reference Information Center, Court Yard Level, 445 12th Street, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20554. Page 1 of 1
      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/International/Public_Notices/2000/pnin0075.pdf
        • Telecommunications Division, International Bureau, (202) 418-1460; TTY: 418-2555. Interested parties may file comments with respect to this notification within 14 days of the date of this public notice (see Section 1.4(b)(4)). The notifying carrier may respond within 10 days after any such pleadings are filed, and the parties that filed such pleadings may reply within 5 days. See Section 63.52(c), 1.45(c)-(j). It is requested that such comments refer to the notification file number shown above. A copy of the notification is available for public inspection in the Reference Information Center, Court Yard Level, 445 12th Street, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20554. Page 1 of 1
      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/International/Public_Notices/2000/pnin0090.pdf
        • Telecommunications Division, International Bureau, (202) 418-1460; TTY: 418-2555. Interested parties may file comments with respect to this notification within 14 days of the date of this public notice (see Section 1.4(b)(4)). The notifying carrier may respond within 10 days after any such pleadings are filed, and the parties that filed such pleadings may reply within 5 days. See Section 63.52(c), 1.45(c)-(j). It is requested that such comments refer to the notification file number shown above. A copy of the notification is available for public inspection in the Reference Information Center, Court Yard Level, 445 12th Street, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20554. Page 1 of 1
      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/International/Public_Notices/2000/pnin0093.pdf
        • Telecommunications Division, International Bureau, (202) 418-1460; TTY: 418-2555. Interested parties may file comments with respect to this notification within 14 days of the date of this public notice (see Section 1.4(b)(4)). The notifying carrier may respond within 10 days after any such pleadings are filed, and the parties that filed such pleadings may reply within 5 days. See Section 63.52(c), 1.45(c)-(j). It is requested that such comments refer to the notification file number shown above. A copy of the notification is available for public inspection in the Reference Information Center, Court Yard Level, 445 12th Street, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20554. Page 1 of 1
      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/International/Public_Notices/2000/pnin0111.pdf
        • Telecommunications Division, International Bureau, (202) 418-1460; TTY: 418-2555. Interested parties may file comments with respect to this notification within 14 days of the date of this public notice (see Section 1.4(b)(4)). The notifying carrier may respond within 10 days after any such pleadings are filed, and the parties that filed such pleadings may reply within 5 days. See Section 63.52(c), 1.45(c)-(j). It is requested that such comments refer to the notification file number shown above. A copy of the notification is available for public inspection in the Reference Information Center, Court Yard Level, 445 12th Street, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20554. Page 1 of 1
      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/International/Public_Notices/2000/pnin0113.pdf
        • Telecommunications Division, International Bureau, (202) 418-1460; TTY: 418-2555. Interested parties may file comments with respect to this notification within 14 days of the date of this public notice (see Section 1.4(b)(4)). The notifying carrier may respond within 10 days after any such pleadings are filed, and the parties that filed such pleadings may reply within 5 days. See Section 63.52(c), 1.45(c)-(j). It is requested that such comments refer to the notification file number shown above. A copy of the notification is available for public inspection in the Reference Information Center, Court Yard Level, 445 12th Street, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20554. Page 1 of 1
      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/International/Public_Notices/2000/pnin0120.pdf
        • Telecommunications Division, International Bureau, (202) 418-1460; TTY: 418-2555. Interested parties may file comments with respect to this notification within 14 days of the date of this public notice (see Section 1.4(b)(4)). The notifying carrier may respond within 10 days after any such pleadings are filed, and the parties that filed such pleadings may reply within 5 days. See Section 63.52(c), 1.45(c)-(j). It is requested that such comments refer to the notification file number shown above. A copy of the notification is available for public inspection in the Reference Information Center, Court Yard Level, 445 12th Street, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20554. Page 1 of 1
      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Orders/1999/fcc99226.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Orders/1999/fcc99226.txt
        • 1 (1994). In the future, however, we will seriously consider dismissing any application for review with similar procedural defects. In addition, on December 8, 1997, Greater Media also submitted a 17-page Supplement to Application for Review with approximately 78 pages of additional attachments. This supplement was submitted without request or authorization by the Commission and, therefore, in violation of Section 1.45(c) of the Commission's rules. Accordingly, we will not consider the Supplement. The Roxboro site is a de facto antenna farm comprised of a number of towers at which the transmission facilities of a number of FM and television stations in the Philadelphia market are clustered. See Beasley Broadcasting of Philadelphia, Inc., 100 FCC 2d 106, 108 (1985). RITOIE is a
      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Orders/2000/fcc00132.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Orders/2000/fcc00132.txt
        • State Broadcasters fail to meet the high burden required for the Commission to grant the extraordinary remedy of a stay pending judicial review. On March 29, 2000, the National Association of Broadcasters (``NAB'') filed a reply to the UCC opposition. On March 31, 2000, UCC filed a motion to dismiss the NAB reply. As UCC notes in its motion, Section 1.45(d) of the Commission's rules clearly states that [r]eplies to oppositions [to a request for stay of any order] should not be filed and will not be considered.'' See 47 C.F.R. � 1.45(d). Accordingly, we grant UCC's motion and will not consider any arguments raised by NAB in its reply. A petition for stay of a Commission action is analyzed under
      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Notices/1998/fcc98025.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Notices/1998/fcc98025.txt http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Notices/1998/fcc98025.wp
        • more limited budgets and resources. We recognize that some applicants may not have access to computers with the hardware and capability to utilize the software necessary to submit their applications electronically, particularly since electronic filing will be accomplished by dial-in procedures and not over the Federal Communications Commission FCC 98-25 See 47 C.F.R. � 1.51. 34 See 47 C.F.R. �� 1.45(a) and (b), 22.105(d). 35 Improvement Notice of Inquiry, supra. 36 See, e.g., comments filed in PP Docket No. 96-17: PCIA Comments at 4-5, SBC Comments at 22, Vanguard 37 Comments at 3; Becker and Associates Comments at 5; Jim Wills Comments at 2; AT&T Comments at 4-6; Association of Public Safety Communications Officials Comments at 10. See, e.g., 47 C.F.R.
      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Orders/1999/da992088.doc
        • DENIED. William W. Kunze Deputy Chief, Commercial Wireless Division Wireless Telecommunications Bureau Federal Communications Commission Letter from William Kellett, Esq., Office of Operations, to Kathleen A. Kaercher, Esq., dated April 16, 1996. Request for Finder's Preference filed April 4, 1995. Letter from William Kellett, Esq., Office of Operations, to Kathleen A. Kaercher, Esq., dated July 20, 1995. 47 C.F.R. � 1.45. The Commission discontinued the Finder's Preference Program for the 800 MHz Service on December 15, 1995. See Amendment of Part 90 of the Commission's Rules to Facilitate Future Development of SMR Systems in the 800 MHz Frequency Band, First Report and Order, Eighth Report and Order, and Second Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, 11 FCC Rcd. 1463, 1634, � 416
      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Orders/2000/da000333.doc
        • 5, 1998 by Colorado 7 - Saguache Limited Partnership and the Petition for Reconsideration or, Alternatively, Comments in Suppport of Petition for Reconsideration and Request for Referral to the Commissioners for Treatment as an Application for Review, filed October 5, 1998 by Colorado 7 - Saguache Limited Partnership, are unauthorized pleadings which will not be considered. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.45. Emergency Request at 1. See September 4 Order at n. 4. Emergency Request at 2. Application at Exhibit III. See 47 C.F.R. �� 22.911(d)(2)(i) and 22.912(b), (c). Federal Communications Commission DA 00-333 Federal Communications Commission DA 00-333 � � �������ž�ů�"ş�-�"�"�"�"�"�"�"�"�"Ō�z�z��"�"� y { | } � � � � � � 0 � � � � �
      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Orders/2000/da000474.doc
        • to Opposition. Because the two NALFs were issued after the pleading cycle for the Petition for Reconsideration had expired and could not have been brought to our attention sooner, we grant High Plains' Motion to Accept Filing, and we consider both High Plains' Supplement to Opposition and Mercury's Supplement to Reply to Opposition in this proceeding. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.45(c) (additional pleadings may be filed only if specifically requested or authorized by the Commission). Mercury PCS II, LLC, FCC 98-203 (Aug. 28, 1998) (NALF Reconsideration Order). Id., � 9. Id., � 10. High Plains Grant Order, 12 FCC Rcd. at 19,629-30 � 7. In its Petition for Reconsideration, Mercury has alleged for the first time that High Plains' Petition to
      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Orders/2000/da002169.doc
        • 0000138813 filed by Broadband WirelessAccess Services, Cambridge Partners, Inc., HiCap Networks, Inc., PIW Development Corporation, Paul R. Likins, Southfield Communications LLC, SMC Associates, Video Communications Corporation, and Wireless Telco on July 31, 2000, IS DISMISSED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED pursuant to Sections 4(i) and 303(r) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 154(i), 303(r), and Sections 1.45(a) and 1.2108 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.45(a), 1.2108, the Consolidated Motion to Accept Late-Filed Pleading and Opposition filed by PTPMS Communications, LLC, on August 18, 2000, IS DENIED. This action is taken under delegated authority pursuant to Sections 0.131 and 0.331 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.131, 0.331. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION D'wana R. Terry Chief,
      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Orders/2000/da002410.doc
        • two petitions on behalf of IVDS Enterprises Joint Venture, Instapage Network LTD, Tel/Logic, Inc., In-Sync Interactive Corporation, Loli, Inc., KMC Interactive TV, Inc., Trans Pacific Interactive, Inc. and Whitehall Wireless Corporation. These pleadings are listed in the Appendix to this ruling. Additionally, although one comment was late filed, we accepted it as an ex parte filing. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.45(b). 47 C.F.R. � 95.803(a). See Amendment of Parts 0, 1, 2 and 95 of the Commission's Rules to Provide for Interactive Video Data Services, GEN Docket No. 91-2, Notice of Proposed Rule Making, 6 FCC Rcd. 1368 (1991) (``Allocation Notice''); see also, Implementation of Section 309(j) of the Communications Act--Competitive Bidding, PP Docket No. 93-253, Second Memorandum Opinion and Order,
      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Orders/2000/fcc00190.doc
        • 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 154(i) and 155(c)(5), and section 1.115 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.115, the Application for Review filed by High Plains Wireless, L.P. on May 6, 1998, 1998, IS DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to section 4(i) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. � 154(i), and section 1.45(c) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.45(c), the Reply to Opposition to Application for Review filed by High Plains Wireless, L.P. on January 6, 1998, IS DISMISSED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to section 4(i) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. � 154(i), and section 1.45(c) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.45(c),
      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Public_Notices/1998/da980097.pdf
        • applications listed in Attachment A must be filed no later than thirty (30) days after the date of this Public Notice (February 20, 1998). See 47 C.F.R. �� 1.2108(b), 90.163(a)(4). Oppositions to petitions to deny must be filed no later than ten (10) days after the date on which the petition to deny was filed. See 47 C.F.R. �� 1.2108(c), 1.45(a). Replies to the opposition must be filed no later than five (5) days after the time for filing oppositions has expired. See 47 C.F.R. �� 1.2108(c), 1.45(b). No application listed herein will be granted sooner than thirty-one (31) days after the date of this Public Notice (February 21, 1998). See 47 C.F.R. �� 1.2108(b), 90.163(a)(4). All winning bidders will be
      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Public_Notices/1998/da980572.pdf
        • be submitted. Application processing and grant. Within thirty (30) days after the Commission gives public notice that the FCC Form 601s are acceptable for filing, petitions to deny may be filed. 47 C.F.R. � 1.2108(b). An applicant may file an opposition to any petitions to deny within ten days after the original pleading is filed. See 47 C.F.R. �� 1.4, 1.45(a), 1.2108(c). A reply to the opposition may be filed within five days after the time for filing opposition has expired. 47 C.F.R. � 1.4, 1.45(b). After the FCC reviews an applicant's FCC Form 601 and any associated filings, a determination will be made as to whether there are any reasons why the license should not be granted. If there are
      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Public_Notices/1999/da991591.pdf
        • in Attachment B are available for public inspection and copying during normal reference room hours at: Wireless Telecommunications Bureau (Gettysburg), Public Reference Room, 1270 Fairfield Road, Gettysburg, PA 17325. In addition, potential bidders may research the Bureau's licensing databases on the World Wide Web in order to determine which frequencies are already licensed to incumbent licensees. 14 47 C.F.R. � 1.45(c). 7 Because some of our incumbent paging licensing records have not yet been converted to the Bureau's new Universal Licensing System (ULS), potential bidders may have to select other databases to perform research for the frequency(s) of interest. The research options below will allow potential bidders to download licensing data, as well as to perform queries online. 929 MHz band
      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Public_Notices/1999/da992508.pdf
        • call completion on all systems on which a handset is capable of operating and all modes � both analog and digital. In this Public Notice, we seek comment on this proposal, in particular on whether the proposed method is consistent with the Commission's Rules and the principles set out by the Commission for 911 call processing modes. Pursuant to Sections 1.45 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. Section 1.45, interested parties may file comments on the Nokia proposal no later than November 30, 1999. Replies shall be filed no later than December 10, 1999. All comments shall reference the docket number of this proceeding. Comments may be filed using the Commission's Electronic Comment Filing System (ECFS) or by filing paper copies.
      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Public_Notices/2000/da000726.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Public_Notices/2000/da000726.html http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Public_Notices/2000/da000726.txt
        • system malfunctions in using handsets with upgraded software compliant with the rule. Motorola states that it needs the limited authority to manufacture 30,000 additional specialized analog handsets for its Telematics product without the 911 call completion software modifications because inventory handsets manufactured prior to February 13, 2000 are expected to be exhausted by the middle of April. Pursuant to Sections 1.45 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. Section 1.45, interested parties may file comments on the Motorola request no later than Monday, April 10, 2000. Replies shall be filed no later than Monday, April 17, 2000. All comments shall reference the docket number of this proceeding. Comments may be filed using the Commission's Electronic Comment Filing System (ECFS) or by filing
      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Public_Notices/2000/da000882.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Public_Notices/2000/da000882.html http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Public_Notices/2000/da000882.txt
        • that it seeks a waiver so that it may continue to meet its minimum contractual obligations to United States wireless service providers. The relief sought is said to be only for the time necessary for Samsung to modify and test handsets to comply with the rule, which in no event will be later than July 15, 2000. Pursuant to Sections 1.45 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. Section 1.45, interested parties may file comments on the Samsung request no later than Friday, April 28, 2000. Replies shall be filed no later than Friday, May 5, 2000. All comments shall reference the docket number of this proceeding. Comments may be filed using the Commission's Electronic Comment Filing System (ECFS) or by filing
      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Public_Notices/2000/da001091.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Public_Notices/2000/da001091.txt
        • technology are adopted in an international standards-setting process will affect either the speed with which a TTY solution can be developed and implemented, or the type of solution that is adopted. III. Procedural Matters We remind parties that the Commission has granted waivers to carriers pending a decision on the implementation date. Those waivers remain in effect. Pursuant to Section 1.45 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.45, interested parties may file comments on the proposed implementation deadline no later than June 19, 2000. Replies shall be filed no later than July 19, 2000. All comments shall reference the docket number of this proceeding. Comments may be filed using the Commission's Electronic Comment Filing System (ECFS) or by filing paper
      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireline_Competition/Orders/2002/fcc02118.pdf
        • CLE C VZ CLE C VZ CLE C VZ CLE C PO-4-01- 6662 % Notices Sent on Time - Ind. Std., Verizon Orig. & CLEC Orig. NA NA 100 TROUBLE REPORTING (OSS) MR-1 - Response Time OSS Maintenance Interface MR-1-01- 2000 Create Trouble 5.93 6.3 6.07 5.72 5.97 3.92 5.72 3.69 6.22 3.6 MR-1-02- 2000 Status Trouble 4.7 3.24 5.01 1.45 5.56 0.45 5.57 0.45 5.43 0.39 MR-1-03- 2000 Modify Trouble 5.86 6 6.02 8.03 5.9 8.62 5.67 0.46 6.24 NA a,b,c,d MR-1-04- 2000 Request Cancellation of Trouble 7 8.13 7.17 7.97 7.14 6.02 6.76 2.42 7.43 2.22 d MR-1-05- 2000 Trouble Report History (by TN/Circuit) 0.55 2.59 0.39 1.75 0.33 1.01 0.32 1.16 0.52 0.99 MR-1-06- 2000 Test Trouble (POTS
      • http://www.fcc.gov/cgb/dro/e911.doc
        • technology are adopted in an international standards-setting process will affect either the speed with which a TTY solution can be developed and implemented, or the type of solution that is adopted. III. Procedural Matters We remind parties that the Commission has granted waivers to carriers pending a decision on the implementation date. Those waivers remain in effect. Pursuant to Section 1.45 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.45, interested parties may file comments on the proposed implementation deadline no later than June 19, 2000. Replies shall be filed no later than July 19, 2000. All comments shall reference the docket number of this proceeding. Comments may be filed using the Commission's Electronic Comment Filing System (ECFS) or by filing paper
      • http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2002/DA-02-1945A1.html
        • not find any other type of sanction to be necessary or justified at this time. 32. Finally, Lincoln asserts that we should sanction Minority for filing frivolous pleadings that have abused the Commission's processes. We decline to do so. Minority's pleadings filed relative to our underwriting investigation were not unauthorized from a procedural standpoint. See, e.g., 47 C.F.R. 1.41 and 1.45. From a substantive standpoint, while we do not accept most of Minority's contentions, we do not find that the licensee has presented facts or legal arguments in a manner lacking good-faith or inconsistent with its right to advocate its views. IV. Ordering Clauses 33. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to Section 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended,26
      • http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2007/DA-07-2079A1.html
        • [ * * * REDACTED * * * ] information Network seeks to provide in its Reply is not germane to the bases of our determination here, see n.16, infra, and Network has made no showing of extraordinary circumstances to justify the filing of a reply not contemplated by the rules, we deny that motion. See generally 47 C.F.R. S 1.45(d). We therefore need not address APCC's filings regarding Network's request: APCC Services, Inc. v. NetworkIP, LLC and Network Enhanced Services, LLP, Opposition to Defendant's Motion for Leave to File a Reply, File No. EB-03-MD-011 (filed May 16, 2007); APCC Services, Inc. v. NetworkIP, LLC and Network Enhanced Services, LLP, Conditional Motion for Leave to File Opposition to Defendant's Reply (filed
      • http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-02-1945A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-02-1945A1.pdf
        • any other type of sanction to be necessary or justified at this time. 32. Finally, Lincoln asserts that we should sanction Minority for filing frivolous pleadings that have abused the Commission's processes. We decline to do so. Minority's pleadings filed relative to our underwriting investigation were not unauthorized from a procedural standpoint. See, e.g., 47 C.F.R. � 1.41 and � 1.45. From a substantive standpoint, while we do not accept most of Minority's contentions, we do not find that the licensee has presented facts or legal arguments in a manner lacking good-faith or inconsistent with its right to advocate its views. IV. Ordering Clauses 33. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to Section 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended,
      • http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-04-960A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-04-960A1.pdf
        • of only one other station. The proposed 60 dB� contour also would encompass portions of U.S. Highways 20 and 26 that presently receive no radio service. While the populations of these ``white'' and ``gray'' areas are only 864 persons and 208 persons respectively, the areas themselves are extensive and, outside of Alaska, rare. 47 U.S.C. � 316. 47 C.F.R. � 1.45(c) prohibits petitioners from raising new matters in reply pleadings. We will waive that provision here due to the importance of the statutory issue raised. 47 U.S.C. � 316 (a)(1), in pertinent part, provides that: Any station license or construction permit may be modified by the Commission either for a limited time or for the duration of the term thereof, if
      • http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-1359A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-1359A1.pdf
        • Leave to File Supplement to Petition for Reconsideration and Request to Rescind Grant of FM Translator Permit'' and the subject Supplement, noting that, subsequent to the filing of the Petition, EMF filed an application (File No. BMPFT-20050718ABY) to modify the Fontana permit, specifying a new transmitter site. This pleading is not authorized under the Commission's Rules, see 47 C.F.R. � 1.45, and EMF's modification application was dismissed on July 22, 2005. Accordingly Amaturo's Motion will be denied. Letter to Educational Media Foundation, Reference 1800B3 (MB Mar. 7, 2005). Additionally, on July 18, 2005, as observed at note 1, supra, EMF filed a minor modification application for Station K244DK, specifying a new transmitter site. The staff dismissed that application on July 22,
      • http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-4517A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-4517A1.pdf
        • genuine ascertainment activities or broadcast meaningful programs that address local needs. Consolidated Reply at 4-6. Consolidated Opposition at n. 17. YMC also argues that KSJO fails to broadcast any programming that addresses issues facing the community. KSJO Reply at 10. However, because YMC first raises this argument in its reply brief, we will not consider its merits. 47 C.F.R. � 1.45(c). License Renewal Applications of Certain Commercial Radio Stations Serving Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, Memorandum Opinion and Order, 8 FCC Rcd 6400, 6401 (1993) (``Philadelphia Station License Renewals''), citing Time-Life Broadcast, Inc., Memorandum Opinion and Order, 33 FCC 2d 1081, 1082 (1972), and Office of Communications of United Church of Christ v. FCC, 707 F.2d 1413 (D.C. Cir. 1983) (subsequent history omitted). Id.
      • http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-08-1416A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-08-1416A1.pdf
        • Station WKVE, Memorandum Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability, 18 FCC Rcd 23411, 23423 (2003). See Broadcast Actions, Public Notice, Report No. 46739 (May 19, 2008). See Commission States Future Policy on Incomplete and Patently Defective AM and FM Construction Permit Applications, Public Notice, FCC 84-366 (rel. Aug. 2, 1984)(the ``Processing Policy Public Notice''). See 47 C.F.R. � 1.45. See Letter to John Garziglia et al., 20 FCC Rcd 12105, 12107 (MB 2005). See 47 C.F.R. � 73.3517. The Application is contingent upon grant to the WOLB(AM) License Application. See Processing Policy Public Notice, infra at n.14. It appears that Radio One has engaged in precisely the gamesmanship it complains of by requesting that the Commission defer the processing
      • http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-08-1661A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-08-1661A1.pdf
        • (1) ``Objection to Motion for Extension of Time (Improper)''; (2) ``Motion to Strike Petition to Deny (Supplement)'' (``Supplement''); (3) ``Motion to Strike Petition to Deny (Supplement 2)'' (``Supplement 2''); and (4) ``Motion to Enlarge.'' We find that the briefs filed by ICR in July were untimely filed outside the pleading cycle permitted by the Commission's Rules. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.45. However, in the interest of a full and complete record in this proceeding, we will consider the arguments set forth in these filings. See Comparative Consideration of 76 Groups of Mutually Exclusive Applications for Permits to Construct New or Modified Noncommercial Educational FM Stations, Memorandum Opinion and Order, 22 FCC Rcd 6101 (2007) (``Comparative Consideration Order''). Id. See 47 C.F.R.
      • http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-08-1946A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-08-1946A1.pdf
        • at 2. Id. Id. Id. at 2-3. See id. at 3. Id. at 3-4. Id. at 4. Heller makes other arguments in the Reply regarding the status of KCI's WMCW(AM) application in relation to the WONX Application, and KCI's character as an applicant. See id. at 1-2. However, these issues were not raised in the Opposition. Therefore, pursuant to Section 1.45 of the Rules, we will not address these additional arguments. 47 C.F.R. � 1.45 (``the reply shall be limited to matters raised in the oppositions''). See Letter to Mentor Partners, Inc., Reference 1800B3-LAS/JP (MB Apr. 1, 2008). Id. at 2. 47 C.F.R. �73.37. 47 C.F.R. � 73.37(Note 2)(1). WONX Application, Attachment 11, Engineering Statement, at 3. Federal Communications Commission Washington,
      • http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-08-2467A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-08-2467A1.pdf
        • ``Opposition to Motion to Dismiss'') and, subsequently, a Request for Expedited Action. Given our disposition of this matter, the Request for Expedited Action will be dismissed as moot. R&R filed a contingent Motion for Extension of Time. R&R sought the extension if the Gold Coast Opposition was deemed a formal opposition governed by the filing deadlines in 47 C.F.R. � 1.45. The Motion for Extension of Time will be dismissed as moot. Gold Coast filed its Opposition ``pursuant to Section 73.3587 of the Commission's Rules'' (the ``Rules'') governing informal objections. The 47 C.F.R. � 1.45 filing deadlines do not apply to informal objections. The Application was filed pursuant to Section 73.3573(g) of the Rules which permits the modification of a station's
      • http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-08-2676A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-08-2676A1.pdf
        • application for Station KNHT(FM) before us, we conclude that these arguments are speculative and have no bearing on the present matter. Petition at 16-17. As Station KNHT(FM) has already been ordered to move from Channel 297C2 to 273C2, any implementation of digital operations on the old channel will be at SOU's sole risk. Reply at 6. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.45(c). See, e.g., Ponce Television Corporation� Memorandum Opinion and Order, 1 FCC Rcd 1167 n.42 (1986). Moreover, Airen counters that SOU's personnel and engineer were not hearing KZCC(FM) but were actually monitoring a translator station - K238AD operating out of Eureka, CA - which is licensed to Educational Media Foundation and which retransmits the programming of KLVG(FM). Airen states that it
      • http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-09-433A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-09-433A1.pdf
        • inquiry into Living Proof's site assurances. Accordingly, we find that the University has not established, prima facie, that Living Proof, at the time it filed its Application, did not have reasonable assurances of its site. We also decline to consider Kalish's Reply to the extent that it also questions whether Living Proof has reasonable assurance of its proposed site. Section 1.45(c) of the Rules dictates that a ``reply shall be limited to matters raised in the oppositions.'' Living Proof did not refer to site availability in its Opposition. Thus, Kalish is barred from raising that issue for the first time in his Reply. Both Kalish and the University challenged the sufficiency of Living Proof's local public notice. However, we agree with
      • http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-09-524A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-09-524A1.pdf
        • � 309(d)(1). For our purposes, an affidavit is a written statement, the truth of which is sworn to or affirmed before an officer who has authority to administer an oath, such as a notary public. Broadcast Procedure Manual, 49 FCC 2d 1, 11 (1974). See, e.g., Action Community Television Network, Inc., Letter, 23 FCC Rcd 9331, 9331-2 (MB 2008). Section 1.45(c) of the Rules indicates that replies ``shall be limited to matters raised in the oppositions.'' October 13, 2005, Motion to Strike at 2, Note 3. See e-mail from Michael Wagner, Associate Chief, Audio Division to Malcolm Stevenson, Esq. (October 2, 2007). Supplement to Motion to Strike, Attachment 3. See, e.g., Port Huron Family Radio, Inc., Decision, 66 RR 2d 545
      • http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-10-1038A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-10-1038A1.pdf
        • (rel. Apr. 7, 2006). On June 14, 2006, the Licensee filed a ``Petition for Leave to File Response'' and a ``Response'' to JMR's Reply, to which JMR, on June 28, 2006, filed an ``Opposition'' to Licensee's ``Petition for Leave to File Response.'' These pleadings are not authorized by the Rules and will not be considered here. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.45; see also, e.g., Secret Communications, Inc., Memorandum Opinion and Order, 18 FCC Rcd 9139 n.1 (2003) (dismissing "Motion for Disclosure of Documents" as unauthorized pursuant to Section 1.45); KOLA, Inc., Memorandum Opinion and Order, 11 FCC Rcd 14297, 14310 (1996); and Kin Shaw Wong, Memorandum Opinion and Order, 11 FCC Rcd 11928, 11930 (1996) (rejecting argument that staff should have
      • http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-10-628A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-10-628A1.pdf
        • K Street, NW, Suite 600, Washington, DC 20006; and to Steven Lewis, 995 Fairwood Terrace, NW, Acworth, GA 30101. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Peter H. Doyle, Chief Audio Division Media Bureau On September 23, 2009, Savage and Jireh (collectively, ``Applicants'') jointly filed an Opposition and, on October 19, 2009, Lewis filed a Reply. Applicants' Opposition was late-filed. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.45(b) (``Oppositions to any motion, petition or request may be filed within 10 days after the original pleading is filed.''). Applicants sought additional time to file their Opposition in a motion filed on September 3, 2009, which Lewis opposed on September 11, 2009. We note that Lewis' Reply also could be considered late-filed. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.45(c) (``The person who
      • http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-10-701A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-10-701A1.pdf
        • on October 28, 2008. New Testament filed a Motion for Leave and an accompanying Response on November 17, 2008. Fourteen Hundred filed an Opposition and Reply (``Opposition and Reply'') on December 12, 2008. Petition at 1-2. Petition at 3. Opposition at 2. Id. at Declaration of Technical Consultant C. Michael Adkins. Opposition at 3. Motion at 4. 47 C.F.R. � 1.45(c). See, e.g., New Jersey Public Broadcasting Authority, Letter, 24 FCC Rcd 2835, 2838 (MB 2009). See also Living Proof, Inc., Letter, 24 FCC Rcd 2382, 2386 (MB 2009) (declining to consider site availability argument when it was improperly raised for the first time in the Reply). See 47 C.F.R. � 1.45. See, e.g., Colorado RSA 7(B)(2) Ltd. Partnership, Order, 15
      • http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-11-1688A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-11-1688A1.pdf
        • Apr. 15, 2002. Filed Mar. 15, 2005. Licensee filed an opposition to the Petition to Deny on May 15, 2002, to which Capstar replied on June 11, 2002. Licensee filed an opposition to the Motion to Dismiss on March 25, 2005, to which Capstar replied on March 31, 2005. Capstar's ``Motion to Dismiss'' is an unauthorized filing pursuant to Section 1.45 of the Rules (See, e.g., New Life Broadcasting, Letter, 25 FCC Rcd 7293, 7294 n.3 (MB 2010) (declining to consider unauthorized pleadings pursuant to Section 1.45 of the Rules)). Accordingly, we dismiss it. 47 U.S.C. �� 309(k), 503(b); 47 C.F.R. � 1.80. 47 C.F.R. � 73.3539. 47 U.S.C. � 301. 47 C.F.R. � 73.3539(a). See 47 C.F.R. �� 73.1020, 73.3539(a).
      • http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-11-1851A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-11-1851A1.pdf
        • at n.1. License Objection Reply at 1-2. 47 C.F.R � 1.106; WWIZ, Inc., Memorandum Opinion and Order, 37 FCC 685, 686 (1964), aff'd sub nom., Lorain Journal Co. v. FCC, 351 F.2d 824 (D.C. Cir. 1965), cert. denied, 387 U.S. 967 (1966). See, e.g., WCVO(FM), Gahanna, Ohio, Letter, 20 FCC Rcd 12348, 12349 & n.4 (MB 2005) (47 C.F.R. � 1.45, which governs filing periods for pleadings, covers formal Petitions to Deny and not Informal Objections). See, e.g., Area Christian Television, Inc., Memorandum Opinion and Order, 60 RR 2d 862, 964 (1986) (informal objections, like petitions to deny, must contain adequate and specific factual allegations sufficient to warrant the relief requested); see also Atlanta Newspapers, Inc., 16 FCC 143 (1951) (staff
      • http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-11-1948A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-11-1948A1.pdf
        • or material questions of fact that otherwise warrant reconsideration of the prior action. Furthermore, the Bureau has the authority to dismiss or deny petitions for reconsideration of actions of the full Commission when the arguments plainly do not warrant consideration by the full Commission. Procedural Issues. As an initial matter, we dismiss HSARG's July 8, 2011, Opposition to Reply. Section 1.45 of the Rules allows for the filing of a petition, any oppositions, and a singular reply by the petitioner. Any unauthorized pleadings are subject to dismissal without consideration. Accordingly, we dismiss HSARG's Opposition to Reply without consideration. Additionally, MBMC argues that HSARG's Opposition is procedurally defective and must be stricken or disregarded. MBMC asserts that the Opposition was signed by
      • http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-11-600A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-11-600A1.pdf
        • basis for questioning CSC's entitlement to a local entity credit - that CSC, as an entity distinct from Morris Council, has not shown any community involvement. See Roane Reply at 3. We will not, however, address this allegation because it constitutes impermissible ``new matter'' that is not sufficiently related to matters raised in the CSC Opposition. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.45(c) (``[t]he reply shall be limited to matters raised in the opposition''). See also Industrial Business Corp., 26 R.R.2d 1447, 1449 (Rev. Bd. 1973) (``To allow the reply to thus serve the purpose of the original petition would be to . . . effectively render meaningless provisions in the rules for a fair opportunity by another party to respond to allegations
      • http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-12-186A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-12-186A1.pdf
        • on January 19, 2011 and a Supplement to Consolidated Opposition to the Petition to Deny and Petition to Issue Letter of Inquiry (``Supplement'') on January 27, 2011. The Bureau granted the Application on January 3, 2011, but rescinded the grant on January 28, 2011, to consider Johnson's Petition. Johnson filed a Reply on March 14, 2011. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.45 (establishing rules governing a pleading cycle consisting only of petitions, oppositions, and replies). 47 C.F.R. � 73.2090. Petition at 2. 47 U.S.C. � 310(d). 47 U.S.C. � 309(d)(1). See id.; Astroline Communications Co. v. FCC, 857 F.2d 1556, 1561 (D.C. Cir. 1988). 47 U.S.C. � 309(d)(2). 47 U.S.C. � 312(g). See Petition, Exhibit A. Johnson fails to explain the inconsistency
      • http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-12-2A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-12-2A1.pdf
        • that there is a statistically significant, though small, increase in the commercial station's revenue. Other measures of LPFM entry do not indicate the presence of an effect. Table 19 Effect of LPFM Entry on the Revenue per Adult of Full-Service Commercial FM Stations Independent Variable Contour Measure Market Measure Contour/Market Measure Number of LPFM stations -0.041 (1.56) 0.069 (2.46)* 0.046 (1.45) Number of AM stations in market -0.196 (10.67)** -0.191 (10.40)** -0.192 (10.48)** Number of AM stations in contour 0.192 (6.08)** 0.189 (5.99)** 0.189 (6.00)** Number of FM stations in market -0.018 (1.43) -0.020 (1.60) -0.018 (1.46) Number of FM stations in contour -0.110 (5.25)** -0.112 (5.36)** -0.113 (5.39)** Number of commercial TV stations -0.055 (1.80) -0.067 (2.18)* -0.062 (2.04)* Number
      • http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/FCC-07-204A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/FCC-07-204A1.pdf
        • interest factors raised by the full-service and LPFM station applicants or other parties. LPFM stations that wish to make a showing under this waiver standard must file an informal objection to the ``encroaching'' community of license modification application within sixty days of the Federal Register notice of such application filing. Oppositions and replies may be filed in accordance with Section 1.45 of the Rules. This presumption is rebuttable and does not bind the Commission to a particular result. We caution parties that even if the required showing is made, the Commission in the exercise of its discretion may conclude that denial of the full-service station application and grant of the waiver would not serve the public interest. We intend to narrowly
      • http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/FCC-08-53A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/FCC-08-53A1.pdf
        • (``Birach I'') (assignee's greater broadcast experience not a relevant good cause for waiver of construction period rule), recon. denied, 20 FCC Rcd 5764 (2005) (``Birach II''). See 47 C.F.R. � 73.3598(c). See Birach I, supra n.10, 18 FCC Rcd at 1416. See May Decision at 2 (citing Streamlining Order, supra n.8, 13 FCC Rcd at 23091). See 47 C.F.R. � 1.45(b). Specifically, Birach argues that the staff has already considered and denied New World's challenges to the grant of WDMV(AM)'s construction permit, and New World did not seek Commission review of those decisions. See Opposition to Request for Leave at 3. The May Decision was a staff letter of the type not generally released or placed on a public notice, but
      • http://www.fcc.gov/ftp/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Databases/documents_collection/75-808.pdf
        • Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit 388 FederalCommunicationsCommissionReports BEFORETHE FEDERALCOMMUNICATIONSCOMMISSION % . ' Washington,D.C. 20554 In theMatter ofMOTIONFORDECLARATORYRULINGONABROADCASTSTATION'SPROMOTIONALRACTICES 54F.C.C.2d Order (AdoptedJuly8,1975;ReleasedJuly23,1975) BYTHE COMMISSION : Wehave beforeusaMotionforDeclaratoryRulingfiledbythe lawfirmofHaley,Bader&PottsonMay9,1975;anOpposition,filed bytheBroadcastBureauonMay20,accompaniedbyaMotionfor LeaveToFilePleading';aReplytotheBureau'sOppositionfiled onMay28;anOppositiontotheMotionfiledbyTidewaterSounds, Inc.onJune112;andaReplytoTidewater'sOppositionfiledon June20. 2.Petitionerasksthatweissueageneralstatementasto promotional practicesinwhichastationmay(ormaynot)engage, particularly inthesaleofadvertisingandwithregardtorepresentations concerningitscoveragearea,itsdayandnighttimepowerandlike matters.Itsuggeststhatsuchastatement,"wouldleavethelicensee sufficientlatitudewithinwhichtoapproachflexiblythepromotionof itsstation."(Motion,atp.6.) 3.First,aspetitionersuggestsinitsreply,thisrequestismorein thenatureofaPetitionforRuleMakingoraPetitionforInquiry thanaMotionforDeclaratoryRuling,andwillbetreatedassuch. 4.Secondly,wedonotthinkitwouldbepracticalorusefulto attempttospecifywhatisandisnotproperinthisarea.Asthe petitionernotes,theremaybe"myriadpossibilitiesforgraphically depictingstationcoveragewhichhavenotbeenthesubjectofCommission consideration"andthesame"canbesaidformethodsofdescribing authorizedfacilitiesinotherpromotionalmaterials."Butwe donotthinkthat"guidelines"answeringthespecificquestionswhich haveoccurredtopetitioner,orwhichmightoccurtous,areauseful solutiontoanticipatingtheingenuityandvarietyofpossible description whichmayraiseaquestionofaccuracy.Thebasicpolicy shouldbewellunderstood.Fulldisclosureandcandorareexpected ofthelicenseeinhisdealingswithpotentialadvertisers--withregard 1TheBureau'sMotionforLeaveToFilePleadingisherebygranted. 2TidewaterisoneofthreemutuallyexclusiveapplicantsforanewFMstationin Suffolk.Virginia(DocketNo.20268-70).VoiceofthePeople(Voice)acompetingparty, isrepresentedbyHaley,Bader&Potts.An80%partnerinVoiceisthesoleshareholder ofWYALRadio,Inc.,andthepromotionalpracticesofWYALareatissueinthe comparativehearing.Tidewater'sOppositionwasfiled20dayslate(seeSections1.45and1.4(g)) andhasnotbeenconsidered. 389 tothestation'scoveragearea,powerandothermattersrelatingto audiencepotential.Inaccurateormisleadingstatementstoinducethe purchaseofadvertisingtimemustbeavoided.Wethinkthatwehave providedsufficientguidanceinthisarea,recognizingthatwecannot, inanyevent,coverallpossibilities. 5.Inviewoftheforegoing,themotionfiledbyHaley,Baderand PottsISDENIED.FEDERALCOMMUNICATIONSCOMMISSION, VincentJ.Mullins,Secretary. PromotionalPractices 54F.C.C.2d
      • http://www.fcc.gov/ib/pd/pf/csreport_2000.pdf
        • 0.13 0.90 2.16 1.83 6 25 18 16 16Venezuela 1,890 4,896 180 6,966 1,065 0.37 0.70 1.31 1.49 7 26 29 21 24Malaysia 613 5,942 0 6,555 128 0.10 0.25 0.37 0.37 1 27 19 n.a . n.a .Denmark 1,258 763 4,410 6,431 657 0.24 0.46 2.87 3.96 9 28 25 26 28Russia 1,455 3,044 0 4,499 696 0.48 1.01 1.45 2.28 1 29 30 18 15Spain 2,726 1,256 2 3,984 3,765 2.17 1.28 1.72 1.58 1 30 n.a . n.a . n.a .Turkey 355 3,070 0 3,425 440 0.12 0.67 1.70 1.49 Top 30 International Points Circuits 430,689 1,571,893 104,062 2,106,644 1,674,961 0.26 0.43 0.73 1.03 Total for all International Points 464,152 1,610,276 104,498 2,178,926 1,692,073 0.27 0.46 0.79 1.11
      • http://www.fcc.gov/ib/pd/pf/telecomrules.html
        • objections have been filed, and (2) The International Bureau has not notified the carrier that grant of the modification request may not serve the public interest and that implementation of the proposed modification must await formal staff action on the modification request. If objections or comments are filed, the carrier requesting the modification request may file a response pursuant to 1.45 of this chapter. Modification requests that are formally opposed must await formal action by the International Bureau before the proposed modification can be implemented. (f) Subject to the availability of electronic forms, all modifications and related submissions described in this section must be filed electronically through the International Bureau Filing System (IBFS). A list of forms that are available for
      • http://www.fcc.gov/ib/sand/mniab/traffic/files/ITRND01.pdf
        • Foreign for all U.S. 4/ Carriers Carriers 6/ Carriers Carriers and Foreign Minutes 1964 20.2 $62.9 $30.3 $32.6 12.0 $19.6 $3.11 $1.50 $1.62 $1.63 $1.62 1965 25.5 78.2 37.2 41.1 15.4 24.7 3.07 1.46 1.61 1.60 1.61 1966 32.3 100.1 47.6 52.5 18.9 30.1 3.10 1.47 1.63 1.59 1.61 1967 39.7 114.2 54.6 59.6 23.4 31.8 2.88 1.38 1.50 1.36 1.45 1968 46.4 126.9 61.5 65.4 28.2 40.0 2.73 1.33 1.41 1.42 1.41 1969 64.6 172.0 82.7 89.4 38.3 51.6 2.66 1.28 1.38 1.35 1.37 1970 81.1 196.6 98.9 97.7 51.0 59.8 2.43 1.22 1.21 1.17 1.19 1971 100.9 237.4 120.7 116.6 68.4 75.1 2.35 1.20 1.16 1.10 1.13 1972 126.5 291.8 148.2 143.6 91.7 98.6 2.31 1.17 1.14 1.08 1.11
      • http://www.fcc.gov/mb/engineering/part78.pdf
        • facie inconsistent with the public interest, convenience, and necessity. Such allegations of fact shall, except for those of which official notice may be taken, be supported by affidavit of a person or persons with personal knowledge thereof. (b) The applicant may file an opposition to any petition to deny, and the petitioner may file a reply to such opposition (see �1.45 of this chapter), in which allegations of fact or denials thereof shall be supported by affidavit of a person or persons with personal knowledge thereof. (c) Notwithstanding the provisions of paragraph (a) of this section, before Commission action on any application for an instrument of authorization, any person may file informal objections to the grant. Such objections may be submitted
      • http://www.fcc.gov/mb/peer_review/prlpfm_rpt_economic_study.pdf
        • though small, increase in the commercial station's revenue. Other measures of LPFM entry do not indicate the presence of an effect. Federal Communications Commission DA 12-2 99 Table 19 Effect of LPFM Entry on the Revenue per Adult of Full-Service Commercial FM Stations Independent Variable Contour Measure Market Measure Contour/Market Measure Number of LPFM stations -0.041 (1.56) 0.069 (2.46)* 0.046 (1.45) Number of AM stations in market -0.196 (10.67)** -0.191 (10.40)** -0.192 (10.48)** Number of AM stations in contour 0.192 (6.08)** 0.189 (5.99)** 0.189 (6.00)** Number of FM stations in market -0.018 (1.43) -0.020 (1.60) -0.018 (1.46) Number of FM stations in contour -0.110 (5.25)** -0.112 (5.36)** -0.113 (5.39)** Number of commercial TV stations -0.055 (1.80) -0.067 (2.18)* -0.062 (2.04)* Number
      • http://www.fcc.gov/mb/peer_review/prrespstudy4c.pdf
        • Regression Results Without Broadband Lines Per Person With Broadband Lines Per Person Variable Coefficient P-value Odds Ratio Coefficient P-value Odds Ratio News Format Prior Period 6.59*** 0.00 727.49 6.59*** 0.000 725.18 AM Station 1.81*** 0.00 6.10 1.85*** 0.000 6.35 Crossowned With Newspaper 1.46** 0.04 4.29 1.43** 0.041 4.16 Crossowned With TV Station 0.79*** 0.00 2.20 0.79*** 0.000 2.21 Commercial Station -1.45*** 0.00 0.24 -1.50*** 0.000 0.22 Local Marketing Agreement -0.42 0.15 0.66 -0.39 0.182 0.67 Sibling News Station in Market 0.39*** 0.01 1.47 0.41*** 0.007 1.51 Owner in Same State 0.24* 0.06 1.27 0.23* 0.078 1.26 Parent Stations in Market 0.04 0.16 1.04 0.05 0.138 1.05 Broadband Lines per Person -6.21 0.360 0.00 Year 2002 -0.13 0.41 0.88 -0.77 0.260 0.46
      • http://www.fcc.gov/oet/info/documents/reports/SHVERA/SHVERA-FCC-05-199.pdf
        • in Table 7: 162 Specifications from Manufacturers of Coaxial Cable (75 ohm) Frequency Manufacturer Cable Type and Model Attenuation (dB/100 ft) Attenuation (db/50 ft) Belden RG 6/U Model 9116 1.71 0.86 Channel Master RG6 9533-500 1.79 0.90 69 MHz (low VHF) Coleman RG 6/U Model 992127 1.9 0.95 Belden RG 6/U Model 9116 2.73 1.37 Channel Master RG6 9533-500 2.89 1.45 194 MHz (high VHF) Coleman RG 6/U Model 992127 3.2 1.6 Belden RG 6/U Model 9116 5.00 2.50 615 MHz (UHF) Channel Master RG6 9533-500 5.57 2.79 Table 7. Coaxial Cable Performance Specifications 85. dLR points out that in all cases the attenuation values assumed in the downlead loss planning factor exceed those of available products. They therefore submit that
      • http://www.fcc.gov/oet/info/peerreview/docs/SHVERA-peer-review-memo.doc
        • Specifications from Manufacturers of Coaxial Cable (75 ohm) Frequency Manufacturer Cable Type and Model Attenuation (dB/100 ft) Attenuation (db/50 ft) 69 MHz (low VHF) Belden RG 6/U Model 9116 1.71 0.86 Channel Master RG6 9533-500 1.79 0.90 Coleman RG 6/U Model 992127 1.9 0.95 194 MHz (high VHF) Belden RG 6/U Model 9116 2.73 1.37 Channel Master RG6 9533-500 2.89 1.45 Coleman RG 6/U Model 992127 3.2 1.6 615 MHz (UHF) Belden RG 6/U Model 9116 5.00 2.50 Channel Master RG6 9533-500 5.57 2.79 Table 7. Coaxial Cable Performance Specifications dLR points out that in all cases the attenuation values assumed in the downlead loss planning factor exceed those of available products. They therefore submit that the current DTV planning factor
      • http://www.fcc.gov/ogc/documents/opinions/1997/aflac.html http://www.fcc.gov/ogc/documents/opinions/1997/aflac.wp
        • the state court generally followed the same principles of offensive use of collateral estoppel as we do, petitioner would have no cause for concern. See Parklane Hosiery Co. v. Shore, 439 U.S. 322, 331 (1979); Milton S. Kronheim & Co. v. District of Columbia, 91 F.3d 193, 197 (D.C. Cir. 1996), cert. denied, 117 S. Ct. 1468 (1997); 47 C.F.R. 1.45(c) (1997); North American Telecomm. Ass'n, FCC 86-304 app., File No. E-85-1, 60 R.R.2d 1355, 1365 (Aug. 1, 1986); see also Montana v. United States, 440 U.S. 147, 157 (1979); Jack Faucett Assocs., Inc. v. American Tel. & Tel. Co., 744 F.2d 118, 125 (D.C. Cir. 1984). What we are left with, then, is simply the impact of the Commission's precedent--or
      • http://www.fcc.gov/ogc/documents/opinions/1997/graceba.html http://www.fcc.gov/ogc/documents/opinions/1997/graceba.wp
        • reconsideration of issues raised after thirty days." Meredith Corp. v. FCC, 809 F.2d 863, 869 (D.C. Cir. 1987). Moreover, Graceba asked the Commission to consider its second petition "in conjunction" with its first, which was timely filed within 30 days of the August 1994 order. Because parties may supplement their pleadings in pending proceedings with agency approval, see 47 C.F.R. 1.45(c), 1.106(f), the Commission clearly had the discretion to entertain Graceba's belated petition. See Meredith, 809 F.2d at 869. We think the Commission exercised that discretion by going on to consider, though briefly, Graceba's claim that it was entitled to a 25 percent reduction in its license price. On that score, the Commission found that Graceba had failed to "demonstrate why
      • http://www.fcc.gov/slamming/part64.pdf
        • and (2) The International Bureau has not notified the carrier that grant of the modification request may not serve the public interest and that implementa- tion of the proposed modification must await formal staff action on the modi- fication request. If objections or com- ments are filed, the carrier requesting the modification request may file a re- sponse pursuant to �1.45 of this chap- ter. Modification requests that are for- mally opposed must await formal ac- tion by the International Bureau be- fore the proposed modification can be implemented. [56 FR 25372, June 4, 1991, as amended at 58 FR 4354, Jan. 14, 1993; 60 FR 5333, Jan. 27, 1995; 62 FR 5541, Feb. 6, 1997; 62 FR 64758, Dec. 9,
      • http://www.fcc.gov/transaction/aol-tw/tseng_comment051100.pdf
        • 4.46 $ 11.48 $ 18.49 $ 25.50 $ 32.51 $ 39.52 $ Analysis for Year 2000 Scenario PPPoE 1 6.4% 16.4% 26.4% 36.4% 46.4% 56.4% *Low* Percentage of 20.0% 0.19 $ 0.49 $ 0.78 $ 1.08 $ 1.38 $ 1.67 $ (U.S.) Subscribers 50.0% 0.38 $ 0.97 $ 1.56 $ 2.15 $ 2.74 $ 3.33 $ On-Line 80.0% 0.56 $ 1.45 $ 2.34 $ 3.22 $ 4.11 $ 5.00 $ 100.0% 0.69 $ 1.77 $ 2.86 $ 3.94 $ 5.02 $ 6.10 $ Internet Cable Modem Penetration Rates Internet Cable Modem Penetration Rates TABLE 4.6: SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS FOR INCREMENTAL CAPITAL COSTS IN BOSTON SCENARIO L2TP 25.0% 35.0% 45.0% 55.0% 65.0% 75.0% Percentage of 20.0% 4.15 $ 5.80 $ 7.46 $ 9.12
      • http://www.fcc.gov/transaction/att-comcast/comcast_appli022802.pdf
        • Finally, neither company owns 95 If the TWE and TWI subscribers were counted, AT&T Comcast would serve approximately 38.63 million subscribers, or 42.30% of all MVPD subscribers. This is calculated as follows: (1) 18.80 million AT&T Broadband subscribers + 8.48 million Comcast subscribers + 11.35 million TWE/TWI subscribers (TWE and TWI actually serve approximately 12.8 million subscribers, but this includes 1.45 million subscribers served by the Time Warner-AT&T Broadband joint ventures in Texas and Kansas City that are already accounted for in the 18.48 million AT&T Broadband subscriber total) = 38.63 million subscribers; and (2) 38.63 million subscribers 91.33 million total MVPD subscribers = 42.30%. 96 See Fox Television Stations, Inc. v. FCC, Case No. 00-1222 (D.C. Cir. Feb. 19, 2002),
      • http://www.fcc.gov/transaction/att-comcast/comcast_attsubscriberchart.pdf
        • text, this is appropriate because AT&T Broadband and Comcast are firmly committed to divesting AT&T Broadband's TWE interest and because, at the time the merger is closed, the TWE/TWI subscribers will not be attributed to the merged entity. The TWE and TWI cable systems serve approximately 12.8 million subscribers (11 million in TWE; 1.8 million in TWI). However, this includes 1.45 million subscribers served by the Time Warner-AT&T Broadband joint ventures in the Texas and Kansas City partnerships that are already accounted for in the table above. Thus, were the TWE/TWI subscribers counted, they would add another 11.35 million subscribers to the chart's total. 3 AT&T Broadband also owns a partial interest in Elbert County Cable Partners (TCI Cablevision of Kiowa,
      • http://www.fcc.gov/transaction/att-comcast/jtpet3petdeny042902.pdf
        • satellite only "exerts a small (shown by the small magnitude of DBS coefficient) but statistically significant influence on the demand for cable service."13 Even the finding of a small effect has recently been reversed. In the same econometric estimation, the Commission concluded that the "the demand for cable service is somewhat price elastic (i.e. has a price elasticity of minus 1.45) and suggests that there are substitutes for cable."14 This elasticity is not very large and the Commission recognizes that in using the adjective "somewhat." 4 The FCC also attempted to estimate a price effect between satellite and cable. If cable and satellite were close substitutes providing stiff competition, one would also expect to see a price effect. Most discussions of
      • http://www.fcc.gov/transaction/att-comcast/jtpet_mot052402.pdf
        • request an extension of one week to reply to the Opposition to Petition to Deny filed by Comcast Corporation and AT&T Corp. (Appli- cants) on May 21, 2002. If the Bureau grants this Motion, Joint Consumer Petitioners will have until June 5, 2002, to file a timely Reply to Applicants� Opposition. On April 29, 2002, in accordance with 47 CFR �1.45 and 47 CFR �1.939, the Joint Consumer Petitioners filed a timely Petition to Deny the above captioned application. See Petition to Deny of Arizona Consumers Council, et al. filed April 29, 2002. Applicants were initially required to file their Opposition to this petition on May 14, 2002. See Public Notice, released March 29, 2002. On May 1, 2002, Applicants filed
      • http://www.fcc.gov/transaction/att-comcast/jtpet_petdeny042902.pdf
        • satellite only �exerts a small (shown by the small magnitude of DBS coefficient) but statistically significant influence on the demand for cable service.�13 Even the finding of a small effect has recently been reversed. In the same econometric estimation, the Commission concluded that the �the demand for cable service is somewhat price elastic (i.e. has a price elasticity of minus 1.45) and suggests that there are substitutes for cable.�14 This elasticity is not very large and the Commission recognizes that in using the adjective �somewhat.� 4 The FCC also attempted to estimate a price effect between satellite and cable. If cable and satellite were close substitutes providing stiff competition, one would also expect to see a price effect. Most discussions of
      • http://www.fcc.gov/transaction/nbc-telemundo.html
        • K52FF, Reno, NV, File No. BTCTT-20011101ABS K47GD, San Luis Obispo, CA, File No. BTCTT-20011101ABX KMAS-LP, Denver, CO, File No. BTCTT-20011101ACG K34FB, Pueblo, CA, File No. BTCTT-20011101ACH W09AT, Fajardo, PR, File No. BTCTT-20011101ACJ W32AJ, Utuado, PR, File No. BTCTT-20011101ACK W68BU, Adjuntas, PR, File No. BTCTT-20011101ACL KWHY-LP, Santa Barbara, CA, File No. BTCTT-20011101ACO Background Interested parties should refer to Sections 1.4 and 1.45 of the Commissions rules to determine appropriate filing dates for pleadings. Contacts For further information, contact Shaun Maher, Mass Media Bureau, at (202) 418-2324 last reviewed/updated on 12/11/06 __________________________________________________________________ [128]Skip Bottom FCC Navigation Links and Contact Info [129]FCC Home | [130]Search | [131]RSS | [132]Updates | [133]E-Filing | [134]Initiatives | [135]Consumers | [136]Find People __________________________________________________________________ [137]Skip FCC Footer and Contact
      • http://www.fcc.gov/transaction/nextel-motorola/nextel_motdismiss011701.pdf
        • this proceeding. At Exhibit B, in a letter dated January 9, 2001, Ms. Carolyn Tatum Roddy of Troutman Sanders LLP states that she and her client discussed with members of the Wireless Telecommunications Bureau ("Bureau") "the relationship between Motorola and Nextel in the 700 MHz guardband auction as disclosed in their Form 175 filing as it 3 For example, Section 1.45(c) of the Commission's Rules provides parties five days to respond to Oppositions filed in response to Petitions to Deny. Thus, had there been no specific deadlines provided for filing Petitions to Deny and Oppositions in this proceeding, Southern would have been required to file its Reply five days after Nextel's Opposition. Here, however, the Commission established specific filing deadlines for
      • http://www.fcc.gov/transaction/telecorp-tritel/leaco_oppstrike091400.pdf
        • Seek FCC Consent to ) DA 00-1589 Transfer Control of, or Assign, ) Broadband PCS and LMDS Licenses ) OPPOSITION TO MOTION TO STRIKE REPLY COMMENTS OF LEACO RURAL TELEPHONE COOPERATIVE, INC. AND COMANCHE COUNTY TELEPHONE COMPANY, INC. Leaco Rural Telephone Cooperative, Inc. ("Leaco") and Comanche County Telephone Company, Inc. ("Comanche") (collectively "Petitioners"), by their attorneys and pursuant to ? 1.45 (b) of the Rules and Regulations of the Federal Communications Commission ("FCC" or "Commission"), hereby oppose the "Motion to Strike of TeleCorp PCS, Inc. et al., or, in the Alternative, Request for Leave to File Substantive Response to Late Filed Comments" ("Motion") filed by TeleCorp PCS, Inc. ("TeleCorp") and its subsidiaries and affiliates (collectively "Applicants") on September 1, 2000. Applicants