FCC Web Documents citing 1.44

as compiled by hallikainen.com/FccRules on 2012 07 01

• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-502A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-502A1.pdf
  • on these stations to the TA, and that it has not yet received a response. CallComm argues that, as a matter of administrative efficiency, the Commission should refrain from taking action on the issue before us while the matter of CallComm's additional stations is before the TA. CallComm's request is in the nature of a stay request governed by Section 1.44(e) of the Commission's rules. We find that CallComm has not met the criteria for a stay, i.e., it has not demonstrated that it will suffer irreparable injury in the absence of a stay, or that it is likely to prevail on the merits. In sum, we resolve this matter in Sprint's favor, and determine that calculation of CallComm's white area
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-43A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-43A1.pdf
  • 405, and section 1.106 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.106, that Farmers' Petition for Reconsideration IS DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), 201, 203, 206, 207, 208, 209, and 405 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 154(i), 154(j), 201, 203, 206, 207, 208, 209, and 405, and sections 1.43, 1.44(e) and 1.106 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.43, 1.44(e), and 1.106, that Farmers' Petition for Stay IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Marlene H. Dortch Secretary Petition for Reconsideration, File No. EB-07-MD-001 (filed Dec. 18, 2009) (``Petition for Reconsideration''). Qwest Commc'ns Corp. v. Farmers and Merchants Mut. Tel. Co., Second Order on Reconsideration, 24 FCC Rcd 14801 (2009) (``Second
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-1639A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-1639A1.txt
  • software before the auction begins, the Commission requests receipt of software orders by 5:30 p.m. ET on Tuesday, August 1, 2000. The minimum hardware and software specifications required for the FCC remote bidding system are listed below: CPU: Intel Pentium or above JRAM: 16 MB (more recommended if you have multiple applications open) Hard Disk: 33 MB available disk space 1.44 MB Floppy Drive or CD-ROM Drive (to install the Remote Bidding System) Modem: v.32bis 28.8 kbps Hayes compatible modem (56.6 kbps recommended) Monitor: VGA or above Mouse or other pointing device - Microsoft Windows 95 or 98 We recommend that you use Netscape Communicator 4.73. However, you can also use Netscape Communicator 4.7 or 4.72. To download Netscape Communicator 4.73
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-1800A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-1800A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-1800A1.txt
  • before the auction begins, the Commission requests receipt of software orders by 6:00 p.m. ET on Monday, August 21, 2000. The minimum hardware and software specifications required for the FCC remote bidding system are listed below: CPU: Intel (R) Pentium or above RAM: 16 MB (more recommended if you have multiple applications open) Hard Disk: 33 MB available disk space 1.44 MB Floppy Drive or CD-ROM Drive (to install the Remote Bidding System) Modem: v.32bis 28.8 kbps Hayes(c) compatible modem (56.6 kbps recommended) Monitor: VGA or above "! includes any other emulated Windows environment. Long-Form Applications: All applicants should be aware that at the long-form application stage, they will be subject to the more extensive reporting requirements contained in the Commission's
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2260A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2260A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2260A1.txt
  • before the auction begins, the Commission requests receipt of software orders by 6:00 p.m. ET on Tuesday, October 17, 2000. The minimum hardware and software specifications required for the FCC remote bidding system are listed below: CPU: Intel (R) Pentium or above RAM: 16 MB (more recommended if you have multiple applications open) Hard Disk: 33 MB available disk space 1.44 MB Floppy Drive or CD-ROM Drive (to install the Remote Bidding System) Modem: v.32bis 28.8 kbps Hayes(c) compatible modem (56.6 kbps recommended) Monitor: VGA or above Mouse or other pointing device "! Windows environment. Long-Form Applications: All applicants should be aware that at the long-form application stage, they will be subject to the more extensive reporting requirements contained in the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2614A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2614A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2614A1.txt
  • before the auction begins, the Commission requests receipt of software orders by 6:00 p.m. ET on Tuesday, November 28, 2000. The minimum hardware and software specifications required for the FCC remote bidding system are listed below: CPU: Intel (R) Pentium or above RAM: 16 MB (more recommended if you have multiple applications open) Hard Disk: 33 MB available disk space 1.44 MB Floppy Drive or CD-ROM Drive (to install the Remote Bidding System) Modem: v.32bis 28.8 kbps Hayes(c) compatible modem (56.6 kbps recommended) Monitor: VGA or above Mouse or other pointing device "! ny other emulated Windows environment. Long-Form Applications: All applicants should be aware that at the long-form application stage, they will be subject to the more extensive reporting requirements
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-405A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-405A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-405A1.txt
  • before the auction begins, the Commission requests receipt of software orders by 5:30 p.m. ET on Tuesday, March 7, 2000. The minimum hardware and software specifications required for the FCC remote bidding system are listed below: CPU: Intel (R) Pentium or above RAM: 16 MB (more recommended if you have multiple applications open) Hard Disk: 33 MB available disk space 1.44 MB Floppy Drive or CD-ROM Drive (to install the Remote Bidding System) Modem: v.32bis 14.4 kbps Hayes(c) compatible modem (56.6 kbps recommended) Monitor: VGA or above Mouse or other pointing device "! lated Windows environment. Bidder Alerts: All applicants must certify on their FCC short-form (Form 175) applications under penalty of perjury that they are legally, technically, financially and otherwise
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1177A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1177A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1177A1.txt
  • connection time to the 900 number service is at no charge, however, $2.30 will be charged for each additional minute. The minimum hardware and software specifications required for the FCC remote bidding system are listed below: CPU: Intel (R) Pentium or above RAM: 16 MB (more recommended if you have multiple applications open) Hard Disk: 33 MB available disk space 1.44 MB Floppy Drive or CD-ROM Drive (to install the Remote Bidding System) Modem: v.32bis 28.8 kbps Hayes(c) compatible modem (56.6 kbps recommended) Monitor: VGA or above "! indows 95 or 98. This includes any other emulated Windows environment. Long-Form Applications: All applicants should be aware that at the long-form application stage, they will be subject to the more extensive reporting
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-138A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-138A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-138A1.txt
  • connection time to the 900 number service is at no charge, however, $2.30 will be charged for each additional minute. The minimum hardware and software specifications required for the FCC remote bidding system are listed below: CPU: Intel (R) Pentium or above RAM: 16 MB (more recommended if you have multiple applications open) Hard Disk: 33 MB available disk space 1.44 MB Floppy Drive or CD-ROM Drive (to install the Remote Bidding System) Modem: v.32bis 28.8 kbps Hayes(c) compatible modem (56.6 kbps recommended) Monitor: VGA or above Mouse or other pointing device "! ny other emulated Windows environment. Long-Form Applications: All applicants should be aware that at the long-form application stage, they will be subject to the more extensive reporting requirements
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2421A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2421A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2421A1.txt
  • � 154(i), 309(d), and Sections 0.331, 24.830, and 24.839 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 0.331, 24.830, and 24.839, that the grant of the Assignment Application filed by ClearComm on February 4, 1999, in the above-captioned proceeding IS FURTHER CONDITIONED on the above conditions. 35. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to Section 1.106, 47 C.F.R. � 1.106, and Section 1.44, 47 C.F.R. � 1.44, that the original request to stay, contained in Centennial's Petition and the Supplemental to Request for Stay and Request for Expedited Ruling, dated October 1, 1999 are DISMISSED. 36. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to Section 1.106, 47 C.F.R. � 1.106, that Wireless Telecommunications Bureau Grants Consent to Assign Two C Block Broadband PCS Licenses, Public
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-174A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-174A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-174A1.txt
  • initio must be regarded as arbitrary and capricious.'' Id. at 12. Supra, �� 5, 10, 18 and accompanying footnotes. See 47 U.S.C. �� 402(c) and 405(a); 47 C.F.R. � 1.429(d). We also note that petitions for reconsideration of the Commission's decisional orders in WT Docket Nos. 98-20 and 98-169 were addressable only to the full Commission. See 47 C.F.R. �� 1.44 (requests requiring action by the Commission shall not be combined in a pleading with requests for action by ... any ... persons acting pursuant to delegated authority); 1.106(a)(1) (Petitions requesting reconsideration of a final Commission action will be acted on by the Commission). See e.g., MCI Telecommunications Corp. v. Pacific Northwest Bell Telephone Co., Memorandum Opinion and Order, 5 FCC
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3542A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3542A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3542A1.txt
  • the latest in a long series of filings by Havens against Regionet and Mobex since May 2000. Mobex argues that Havens' Petition and Complaint is defective, because it combines a request directed to the Chief of the Wireless Telecommunications Bureau (Bureau) with a complaint pursuant to Section 208 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, in violation of Section 1.44(c) of the Commission's Rules. Havens' Petition and Complaint must therefore be dismissed, Mobex contends, pursuant to Section 1.44(d) of the Commission's Rules. Mobex further argues that Havens fails to demonstrate standing to protest the applications in question, as Havens cites no station of his which is active and competes with Mobex in any of Mobex's service areas. Mobex contends that
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3621A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3621A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3621A1.txt
  • Alternatively, Application for Review, File No. BPLIF-951016BM (filed Jan. 19, 1999) (Second Indianapolis Petition). We note that HITN requests that if it is determined that a petition for reconsideration does not lie, that its petitions be considered as an application for review. Second Anderson Petition at 1 n.1, Second Indianapolis Petition at 1 n.1. This request is contrary to Section 1.44(a) of the Commission's Rules, which states that requests for Commission action shall not be combined with requests for action by delegated authority. 47 C.F.R. � 1.44(a). In this case, however, we conclude that consideration of the Second Anderson Petition and Second Indianapolis Petition are in the public interest in order to consider fully HITN's arguments. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.106(c)(2).
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-4097A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-4097A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-4097A1.txt
  • Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 154(i), 405, and Section 1.106 of Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.106, the Request for Reconsideration filed by Thomas K. Kurian on October 15, 2002 IS GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to Sections 4(i) and 405 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 154(i) and Section 1.44(e) of Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. 1.44(e), the Motion for Stay Pending Reconsideration filed by Thomas K. Kurian on October 15, 2002 IS DISMISSED AS MOOT. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to Sections 4(i) and 5(c) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 154(i), 155(c), that FCC File No. 0000415681will be REINSTATED and shall be processed consistent
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2479A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2479A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2479A1.txt
  • 47 U.S.C. �� 154(i), 155(c), 309(j) and 405, and 47 C.F.R. � 1.115, the Application for Review filed by Sainte Partners II, LP IS HEREBY DISMISSED for failure to comply with the requirements of 47 C.F.R. � 1.115. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to 47 U.S.C. �� 154(i), 155(c), 309(j) and 405, and 47 C.F.R. �� 1.41, 1.43, and 1.44, the Request for Stay of Auction No. 81 filed by Sainte Partners II, LP IS HEREBY DENIED. These actions are taken under authority delegated pursuant to 47 C.F.R. �� 0.131 and 0.331(c). FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Catherine W. Seidel Acting Chief Wireless Telecommunications Bureau See ``Applicants for Low Power Television Construction Permits to be Awarded in Auction No. 81 Must Submit
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-675A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-675A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-675A1.txt
  • thus would effect - not prevent - a change in the status quo. This result would be inconsistent with the purposes of a stay pending judicial review. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED pursuant to the authority of sections 1, 4(i), and 4(j) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151, 154 (i), 154(j), and sections 1.43 and 1.44 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.43, 1.44, that the Petition for Stay Pending Judicial Review submitted by Verizon in the above-captioned proceeding on February 25, 2005, IS DENIED. This action is taken under delegated authority pursuant to sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Jeffrey J. Carlisle Chief, Wireline
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1333A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1333A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1333A1.txt
  • Radio Services, Memorandum Opinion and Order, 14 FCC Rcd 12757 (1999) (denying March 1993 motions for declaratory ruling as untimely petitions for reconsideration of, and impermissible collateral attacks on, the Commission's Frequency Coordination decision, which became final in 1987). See 47 C.F.R. � 1.102 (the Commission may issue a declaratory ruling ``terminating a controversy or removing uncertainty.'') 47 C.F.R. � 1.44(e). See 47 U.S.C. � 308(c); 47 C.F.R. �� 73.3580(a)(1), 73.3584. 47 C.F.R. � 73.3597. The WTRK(FM) Assignment Application was accepted for filing by Public Notice released on March 30, 2004. See Broadcast Applications, Report No. 25703 at 2. Petitions to deny the application were due within 30 days of that date. 47 U.S.C. � 309(d); 47 C.F.R. � 73.3584. MCR
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1564A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1564A2.txt
  • on 35 measurements). Table 7-2. D/U Ratio With SFU as Desired Signal Source Relative to That With Baseline Generator (ATSC997) D/U Ratio Relative to Baseline (dB) Channel Offset A3 D3 I1 J1 M1 N1 O1 G4 Mean (dB) (Excluding G4) Standard Deviation (dB) (Excluding G4) N-6 -1.37 -0.01 -1.54 -1.42 -1.39 -1.96 -1.29 -6.29 -1.28 0.60 N-4 -1.15 -0.11 -1.00 -1.44 -1.16 -1.51 -1.03 -5.16 -1.06 0.46 N-3 -1.03 -0.88 -0.98 -0.57 -1.10 -1.50 -1.06 -5.70 -1.02 0.28 N-2 -1.21 -0.56 -0.96 -1.63 -1.14 -1.42 -0.90 -4.82 -1.12 0.35 N+2 -1.28 -1.50 -1.27 -1.44 -0.75 -1.30 -1.12 -4.49 -1.24 0.25 Mean -1.21 -0.61 -1.15 -1.30 -1.11 -1.54 -1.08 -5.29 -1.14 Std Dev 0.13 0.61 0.25 0.42 0.23 0.25 0.14 0.72 0.40
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3470A4.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3470A4.txt
  • 0.11 TV-PG-VTelevision 0.75 2.29 0.34 TV-14-VTelevision 0.91 3.70 0.26 TV-MA-VTelevision 0.04 0.00 0.04 Anyofthethreeabove 0.78 2.88 0.28 Anyofthelasttwoabove 0.81 3.51 0.23 ReligiousProgramming NetworksShowingPrimarilyReligiousProgramming 0.09 0.14 0.00 "ReligiousProgramming" 0.02 0.01 0.04 OverallTargeting AverageTVContentRating(wherenotedforTV) AverageMPAARating(wherenotedformovies) Observations 265,388 35,448 229,940 Notes:Reportedinthetableistheaveragerating(i.e.shareofU.S.householdsthatwatchaprogram) acrossprogramtypes.AverageisoverthesamenetworksandtimeperiodsdescribedinthenotestoTable 6.Itiscalculatedbyweightingprogrammingofeachtypebythenumberofhouseholdsthatviewedthe program.SeeSection5.1formoredetails.Source:Authorcalculations. 37 Table9: ProgramRatingsasaShareofHouseholdswithAccess(ProgramQuality) 6:00p.m.-12:00a.m.EST(orequivalent),2weeks/year,2003-2005 AllBroadcast Cable Variable Networks NetworksNetworks NewsProgramming AnyNews 1.73 3.03 0.29 NetworkNews 3.56 3.59 0.00 LocalNews 1.44 2.84 0.29 PublicAffairsProgramming 0.48 0.17 0.54 MinorityProgramming NetworksTargetingBlackAudiences 0.23 - 0.23 TargetingLatinoAudiences OnNetworksTargetingLatinoAudiences 0.64 1.08 0.02 Spanish-LanguageProgramming 0.45 0.79 0.03 NetworksTargetingOtherDiverseAudiences 0.01 - 0.01 Children'sProgramming "Children'sProgramming" 0.41 0.04 0.43 GMoviesorTV-Y/TV-Y7TV 0.61 0.31 0.63 Eitheroftheabove 0.54 0.19 0.55 FamilyProgramming NetworksTargetingFamilies 0.52 - 0.52 TY-GProgramming 0.50 0.81 0.42 Arts,Educational,orDocumentaryProgramming 0.31 0.04 0.35 Eitherofthetwoabove 0.42 0.58 0.39 AdultProgramming NetworksShowingAdultProgramming - - - NC-17MoviesorTV-MA-S/TV-MA-LTV
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3470A6.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3470A6.txt
  • 0.09 0.04 0.07 0.19 0.03 -0.06 - Percent Music, Evening 0.70 0.67 0.67 0.75 0.61 0.89 0.22 + Percent News, Evening 0.01 0.00 0.01 0.005 0.01 0.00 -0.002 - Percent Sports, Evening 0.04 0.02 0.06 0.01 0.00 0.00 -0.02 - Average Block, Advertisements, AM Drive 1.33 1.84 1.23 1.31 1.03 1.63 -0.21 - Average Block, Entertainment/Leisure/DJ Banter, AM Drive 2.04 1.44 2.48 1.65 2.04 0.63 -0.82 - Average Block, Music, AM Drive 2.49 3.18 2.33 2.51 2.00 3.06 -0.11 - Average Block, News, AM Drive 0.62 0.39 0.70 0.56 0.59 0.88 0.48 + Average Block, Sports, AM Drive 0.16 0.06 0.20 0.07 0.11 0.61 0.55 + Average Block, Advertisements, Evening 1.07 1.19 0.91 1.17 2.28 0.63 -0.56 - Average Block, Entertainment/Leisure/DJ
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3470A7.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3470A7.txt
  • Notes: Absolute values of t-statistics in parentheses (using heteroscedastic-consistent standard errors corrected for clustering by television station); ***p<.01, **p<.05 and *p<.10. 43 Table 11: Total State and Local Poll Coverage (in seconds) Independent variables (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) Local station ownership Cross-owned newspaper 3.3 (1.41) 2.3 (0.57) 0.1 (0.04) 0.4 (0.13) -0.5 (0.17) Cross-owned radio station -10.9 (1.63) -9.6 (1.44) -10.7 (1.44) -11.0 (1.44) Cross-owned radio and newspaper 9.7 (1.10) 10.9 (1.30) 11.5 (1.39) 13.1 (1.58) Parent company coverage of all television households (%) 0.3 (1.55) 0.4 (1.50) 0.4 (1.55) Network owned and operated -10.2* (1.83) -9.9 (1.28) -9.7 (1.30) Network affiliation (omitted category is CW\MyNetwork) ABC 3.3 (0.51) -7.1 (0.96) CBS -4.5 (0.87) -15.3** (2.07) FOX 0.2 (0.03) -0.4
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3470A8.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3470A8.txt
  • RealEstate,Rental,Leasing 20.60 63.67 15.73 54 Professional,Scienti�c,TechnicalServices 19.09 71.82 9.09 55 ManagementofCompanies&Enterprises Administrative&Support&Waste 12.09 79.80 8.10 56 Management&RemediationService 20.86 64.73 14.41 61 EducationalServices 39.47 41.85 18.68 62 HealthCare&SocialAssistance 23.78 68.57 7.65 71 Arts,Entertainment&Recreation 21.21 62.74 16.05 72 Accommodation&FoodServices 21.10 58.12 20.78 81 OtherServices(exceptpublic) 22.70 61.35 15.95 AllNon-FarmBusinesses 17.74 68.41 13.85 6 Table2:OwnershipbyRaceandEthnicity Percent NAICSName HispanicWhiteBlackAmIndAsian 22 Utilities 0.85 96.79 1.13 0.89 1.44 23 Construction 3.57 97.15 1.24 0.68 1.04 31-33 Manufacturing 3.57 94.57 0.72 0.48 4.09 42 WholesaleTrade 3.84 91.40 0.60 0.25 7.57 44-45 RetailTrade 3.60 89.55 1.22 0.42 8.58 48-49 Transportation&Warehousing 5.60 94.07 2.99 0.54 2.10 51 Information 2.82 93.04 2.07 0.40 4.33 515112 RadioStations 3.71 93.29 4.35 0.17 2.27 515120 TVStations 6.04 89.11 4.89 0.00 6.03 511110 NewspaperPublishers 1.58 93.50
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-880A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-880A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-880A1.txt
  • Auction of FM Broadcast Construction Permits Scheduled for November 1, 2005, Notice and Filing Requirements, Minimum Opening Bids, Upfront Payments and Other Procedures for Auction No. 62, Public Notice, 20 FCC Rcd 10492 (2005) (``Auction No. 62 Procedures Public Notice''). We act on Itz's Request despite his having filed it in comments on Auction No. 62. Cf. 47 C.F.R. � 1.44 (separate pleadings for different requests). 2510 Licenses, LLC, Petition for Waiver and Request for Expedited Action, filed February 22, 2006 (``2510 Licenses Petition''). We also received similar waiver requests from Wildcat Communications LLC (Wildcat) and Bigglesworth Broadcasting, LLC (Bigglesworth) in letters dated November 23, 2004, and a Petition for Waiver filed by Talkline Communications, Inc. (Talkline) on January 18, 2005.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1891A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1891A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1891A1.txt
  • We believe that the public interest in maintaining a competitive balance in the Concord Metro is best served by terminating the JSA so that it will comply with the ownership limit for the Concord market. Request for Stay. Nassau's request to stay the effectiveness of Note 2 is subject to dismissal on numerous procedural grounds. As an initial matter, Section 1.44(e) of the Rules requires that a stay request must be filed as a separate pleading. Nassau, however, combined is waiver and stay requests in a single pleading. The Request, thus, is subject to dismissal on this basis alone. Pursuant to Section 1.429(k) of the Rules, ``upon good cause shown, the Commission will stay the effective date of a rule pending
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1950A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1950A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1950A1.txt
  • communities served.'') See Deregulation of Radio, Report and Order, 84 FCC 2d 968 (1981), recon. granted in part, Memorandum Opinion and Order, 87 FCC 2d 796 (1981), aff'd in relevant part, Office of Communications of the United Church of Christ v. FCC, 707 F.2d 1413, 1435 (D.C. Cir 1983). See also 47 C.F.R. �� 73.3526, 73.3527. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.44(e). See Hispanic Information and Telecommunications Network, Inc., Memorandum Opinion and Order, 20 FCC Rcd 5471, 5479 (2005) (citing Virginia Petroleum Jobbers Association v. FPC, 259 F.2d 921, 925 (D.C. Cir. 1958), as revised by Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority v. Holiday Tours, Inc., 559 F.2d 841, 843 (D.C. Cir. 1977). Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C. 20554 August 21, 2008 P
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2726A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2726A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2726A1.txt
  • recon. granted in part, Memorandum Opinion and Order, 87 FCC 2d 796 (1981), aff'd in relevant part, Office of Communications of the United Church of Christ v. FCC, 707 F.2d 1413, 1435 (D.C. Cir 1983). See also 47 C.F.R. �� 73.3526, 73.3527. See WNOW-FM, 23 FCC Rcd at 8420. Suburban Community, 93 FCC 2d at 456. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.44(e). See Hispanic Information and Telecommunications Network, Inc., Memorandum Opinion and Order, 20 FCC Red 5471, 5479 (2005) (citing Virginia Petroleum Jobbers Association v. FPC, 259 F.2d 921, 925 (D.C. Cir. 1958), as revised by Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority v. Holiday Tours, Inc., 559 F.2d 841, 843 (D.C. Cir. 1977). 47 U.S.C. � 309(e). See, e.g., WWOR-TV, Inc., Memorandum Opinion
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-209A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-209A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-209A1.txt
  • 2. Petition at 5-6. See Aspen FM, Inc., Memorandum Opinion and Order, 12 FCC Rcd 17852, 17855 (1997) (citing North American Broadcasting Co., Inc., 15 FCC 2d 979 (1969)). Fatima Response, Inc., Memorandum Opinion and Order, 14 FCC Rcd 18543, 18546 (1999), recon. dismissed, 15 FCC Rcd 10520 (2000). See Opposition at 3 and Ex. 2. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.44(e). . / � ", 259 F.2d 921, 925 (D.C. Cir. 1958)). Plus has not addressed, much less met, the prerequisites for a stay. Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C. 20554 February 10, 2009 �%���PNG �` �` b``D� 4 �&)�@�-�@�@�7 H >��O��� p j�� �2�=��k��� �"_� - J��, �Nt�Rb �7�P���U�ZS '��wp��ˈ jP�T{.|�87w]�g��yA�Ҩ-��=T#�O> �#W p����U�^S� �t�''�TxNt�l ۦ��X6`T{������:�r�� �A�R\ )]h]e�M8�I̟`�?K^��� ?C��A�UU �3ꡟ=��A � \�+�_
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2541A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2541A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2541A1.txt
  • arguments identical to those previously considered and rejected by the Bureau. Joint Opposition at 3. Joint Opposition at 2. Gresham states that the Joint Opposition provided no response to the Petition to Deny, but instead, merely, attempted to ``incorporate by reference'' the previously filed Opposition to Gresham's Application for Review. Gresham argues that such procedure is improper citing 47 C.F.R. �1.44. Reply at 2. Id. at 13-14. Although not in response to Gresham's filing of the Decision Letter with the Court, on September 2, 2009, the Court ordered Gresham to pay certain attorneys' fees claimed by Caswell and the Receiver. See Ex Parte: Saunders v. Gresham Communications of Walterboro, Inc., No. 92-CP-15-508, slip op. at 7 (SC Ct. of Com. Pleas.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-53A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-53A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-53A1.txt
  • Highly Subscribed Digital Tier (2) N Mean S.E. N Mean S.E. Sample groups overall 754 4.3 0.08 725 40.6 0.81 Noncompetitive Communities 434 4.3 0.08 416 41.0 0.91 Communities relieved from rate regulation 320 4.1 0.13 309 37.7 0.91 Second cable operator subgroup (overall) 108 4.6 0.22 103 38.4 1.15 Second cable operator subgroup (incumbents) 54 4.6 0.27 53 37.0 1.44 Second cable operator subgroup (rivals) 54 4.6 0.30 50 42.6 1.55 DBS subgroup 125 3.5 0.19 123 39.7 1.45 Wireless MVPD subgroup 31 5.2 0.28 31 29.6 1.99 Low penetration test subgroup 56 2.5 0.30 52 35.4 1.90 Source: 2006 survey. (1) Video channels showing re-transmissions in digital high definition of local broadcast stations, requiring lease of a high definition
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-643A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-643A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-643A1.txt
  • order to determine whether NUSCO's proposed sites afford adequate protection to Station WQA216, and whether PSI's proposed relocation expands the station's service area. That consideration has been complicated in this matter by the fact that the facility no longer exists and cannot be replicated. Parameter NUSCO PSI Antenna height above ground 527.6 meters 419.41 meters Transmission line loss 3.9 dB 1.44 dB Antenna gain 5.9 dB 8 dB Combiner and filter loss 8.5 dB 1.31 dB Effective radiated power (ERP) 5.6 watts 165.57 watts The differences in antenna height above ground and transmission line loss reflects that NUSCO's analysis assumes that the station was located on the WTC antenna mast, while, as discussed above, we conclude that it was located on
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-212A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-212A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-212A1.txt
  • until 30 days after publication in the Federal Register is moot. PCIA also argues that by asking the Commission to declare or clarify that zoning authorities may toll the 90- or 150-day review period at any time, Petitioners are impermissibly seeking a new rule in the context of a request for stay. PCIA Opposition at 2-3; see 47 C.F.R. � 1.44(e) (``Any request to stay the effectiveness of any decision or order of the Commission shall be filed as a separate pleading. Any such request which is not filed as a separate pleading will not be considered by the Commission.''). Because we deny the Stay Request on other grounds, we need not address this argument. Stay Request at iii. Id. at
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-212A1_Rcd.pdf
  • the Ruling until 30 days after publication in the Federal Register is moot. 30PCIA also argues that by asking the Commission to declare or clarify that zoning authorities may toll the 90-or 150-day review period at any time, Petitioners are impermissibly seeking a new rule in the context of a request for stay. PCIA Opposition at 2-3; see47 C.F.R. � 1.44(e) ("Any request to stay the effectiveness of any decision or (continued....) 1218 Federal Communications Commission DA 10-212 A. Irreparable Harm 8.Petitioners claim their members "are likely to suffer significant, immediate harm" if the 30- day completeness deadline is not stayed.31Petitioners first contend that because the Rulingtook effect immediately upon release on November 18, 2009, member communities that had siting requests
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2233A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2233A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2233A1.txt
  • the Petition for Stay filed on September 17, 2010, by the Northern Chumash Tribal Council IS DISMISSED AS MOOT. 23. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to Sections 4(i) and 405 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 154(i), 405, Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966, 16 U.S.C. � 470f, and Sections 1.106, 1.44(e), 1.1307(a)(4), and 1.1307(a)(5) of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.106, 1.44(e), 1.1307(a)(4), 1.1307(a)(5), that the Petition for Reconsideration filed on October 8, 2010, by Frank Arredondo IS DISMISSED insofar as it seeks a stay of the effectiveness of the Division's determination and otherwise IS DENIED. 24. These actions are taken under delegated authority pursuant to Sections 0.131 and 0.331
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2233A1_Rcd.pdf
  • NCTC Petition at 3-4, in the absence of contrary information from the Tribe we consider the monitor's concurrence as evidence supporting the likely accuracy of the survey's findings. 45NCTC Petition at 4. 46Id. at 4-5. 47In addition, Mr. Arredondo's request for stay is subject to dismissal because he did not file it as a separate pleading as required under Section 1.44(e) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.44(e). 16244 Federal Communications Commission DA 10-2233 Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.106, 1.1307(a)(4), 1.1307(a)(5), that the Petition for Reconsideration filed on September 20, 2010, by the Northern Chumash Tribal Council IS DENIED. 22. IT ISFURTHER ORDEREDthat the Petition for Stay filed on September 17, 2010, by the Northern Chumash Tribal Council IS
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-502A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-502A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-502A1.txt
  • on these stations to the TA, and that it has not yet received a response. CallComm argues that, as a matter of administrative efficiency, the Commission should refrain from taking action on the issue before us while the matter of CallComm's additional stations is before the TA. CallComm's request is in the nature of a stay request governed by Section 1.44(e) of the Commission's rules. We find that CallComm has not met the criteria for a stay, i.e., it has not demonstrated that it will suffer irreparable injury in the absence of a stay, or that it is likely to prevail on the merits. In sum, we resolve this matter in Sprint's favor, and determine that calculation of CallComm's white area
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-2020A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-2020A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-2020A1.txt
  • (USAC) submitted projections of demand and administrative expenses for the first quarter of 2012. Accordingly, the projected demand and expenses are as follows: ($ millions) Program Demand Projected Program Support Admin. Expenses Application Of Interest Income Application of Periodic True-Ups & Prior Period Adjustment Total Program Collection Schools and Libraries 542.47 20.03 (3.05) 49.50 608.95 Rural Health Care 22.53 3.46 (1.44) 0.86 25.41 High-Cost 1,097.04 4.59 (2.04) 98.67 1,198.26 Low Income 584.11 2.22 (0.03) 71.16 657.46 TOTAL 2,246.15 30.30 (6.56) 220.19 2,490.08 USAC Projections of Industry Revenues USAC submitted projected collected end-user telecommunications revenues for January through March 2012 based on information contained in the First Quarter 2012 Telecommunications Reporting Worksheet (FCC Form 499-Q). The amount is as follows: Total Projected
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-106A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-106A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-106A1.txt
  • expenses pursuant to the framework established in the FCC's Declaratory Ruling . . . ''' are contrary to Commission regulations and the Declaratory Ruling. Sandwich Isles ``ask[s] the FCC to stay NECA from its inappropriate course of conduct.'' DISCUSSION We dismiss the Sandwich Isles Motion without prejudice to its filing of an appropriate petition for declaratory ruling. Sections 1.43 and 1.44 of the Commission's rules, cited by Sandwich Isles as authority for the Commission action sought in its Motion, contain rules applicable to ``requests for stay of any order or decision'' and ``any request to stay the effectiveness of any decision or order of the Commission . . . .'' Here, Sandwich Isles does not seek a stay of any action
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-187A2_Rcd.pdf
  • Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit S1100 S1200 S1400 S1500 S1630 S1640 S1730 S1740 S1750 AK 8,356 141 67 29 4 84,406 354,194 27.61 1,772.61 5,509.51 7,017.95 0.00 94.22 207.10 3,643.22 19.65 AL 5,435 344 215 63 18 39,963 4,060 3.12 456.65 5,944.53 199.24 1.44 0.92 0.00 314.36 1.69 AR 3,682 175 100 50 14 12,058 2,746 0.00 343.10 4,035.50 176.99 0.06 206.45 0.00 345.21 11.81 AZ 34,345 234 132 15 8 85,332 36,847 12.77 865.50 42,398.07 4,124.07 4.43 50.43 0.32 1,584.27 29.37 CA 19,650 407 249 51 30 34,947 32,135 36.68 1,265.05 29,222.59 3,371.59 8.51 24.00 1.16 934.09 5.39 CO 11,271 219 150 58
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-2A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-2A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-2A1.txt
  • Religion Formats Contour Measure All Market Ratings 0.018 (0.17) 0.002 (0.21) 0.014 (0.17) 0.014 (1.73) Home Market Ratings 0.088 (0.28) 0.001 (0.03) 0.027 (1.43) 0.029 (1.59) Market Measure All Market Ratings 0.018 (0.39) 0.017 (1.39) 0.004 (0.49) 0.007 (0.77) Home Market Ratings 0.088 (0.28) 0.015 (0.53) 0.002 (0.12) 0.008 (0.53) Contour/Market Measure All Market Ratings 0.018 (0.17) 0.006 (0.27) 0.021 (1.44) 0.022 (1.54) Home Market Ratings 0.088 (0.28) 0.004 (0.12) 0.024 (1.02) 0.028 (1.23) * - estimated regression coefficient is different from zero at the 95 percent level of confidence. ** - estimated regression coefficient is different from zero at the 99 percent level of confidence. The coefficient on the number of LPFM stations is reported. Other coefficients are not reported.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-96-1482A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-96-1482A1.txt
  • at 7. 22 EchoStar Reply at 8-9. 23 Both DBSC and EchoStar maintain that they were not served in compliance with the Commission's rules for service of an opposition pleading, and that CPT impermissibly combined separate petitions (for denial of the application and for rulemaking) in a single pleading. 47 U.S.C. � 309 (d); 47 C.F.R. � � 1.47 and 1.44(d). 24 We also note that issues concerning the potential anticompetitive effects of consolidation among DBS permittees were extensively discussed by actual and potential competitors in that proceeding. Notwithstanding their demonstrated interest in anti-competitive concerns, neither existing nor prospective DBS permittees have opposed the present transaction between DBSC and EchoStar. 10497 11. CPT's principal objection in this case arises from the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-97-2191A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-97-2191A1.txt
  • 120 SOARSORderat 103. I SOARSOrderat 106. 122 ld 7989 (3) TecJznicalQualifications FederalCommunicationsCommission DA97-2191 40. TheSDARS'OrderrequiresSOARSlicensees'systemstoprovide,ataminimum.full CONUScoverage.1:!3Inaddition,coveragetootherareasorterritoriesoftheUnitedStatesis stronglyencouraged,ifpractical.124CORadioproposesthatitstwogeostationarysatellitesat approximately800W.L.and1100W.L.,ataminimum,providecontinuousSOARStothe48 contiguousstatesoftheUnitedStates.Accordingly,CORadio'sproposedSOARSsystemcomplies withtheSDARSOrder'scoverage/servicearearequirements.125 41. TheSDARSOrderalsorequiresSOARSapplicantstoprovideinformationontheir servicelinkbudgetsinaccordancewithSection25.114(c)(9)oftheCommission'srules.126 Accordingtoitsamendment,CORadiowillprovideaservicelinkmarginof18dB.127. 42. TheSDARSOrdermandatesthat,attheveryleast,consumersshouldbeabletoaccess thecoveredservicesfromalllicensedSOARSsystemsviaasinglereceiver.128Therearesignificant differencesbetweenCORadio'sandAMRC'sproposedtransmissiontechnologiesthatmayaffect receiverinteroperability.However,initsamendment,CORadioexpresseditscommitmenttowork withallinterestedparties.toinsurethattheSOARSreceiverswillpermitcustomerstoaccessboth systems.129ConsideringthatSOARSreceiverinteroperabilityisintheinterestofconsumers,the industry,andthelicensees,CDRadio'slicenseisconditioneduponitscertificationtothe CommissionthatitsfinalreceiverdesignisinteroperablewiththeAMRCSOARS. 43. TheSDARSOrderrequiresapplicantstoidentifywhichcodingschemeandcoding rate(s)theyplantoimplementintheirSOARSsystems,andrequiresthoseSOARSsystemsthat intendtoofferaudioformatsotherthanCDqualitytobecapableoftransmittinglowerqualityaudio 123 Seealso�25.144(2)(i)([s]erviceofthe48statesoftheUnitedStatesisfullCONUS). 124 SOARSOrderat 99. 125 Amendmentat8. 126 SOARSOrderat 101. 127 Amendmentat26,Table.3. 128 SOARSat 106. 129 CORadioAmendmep.tat25. 7990. FederalCommunicationsCommission DA97-2191 atlowerdatarates.DOCDRadio'sSDARSsystemcomplieswiththeapplicabledata compression/codingrequirements.TheCDRadiosystem willusePerceptualAudioCoding(liPAC") algorithmtocompressCDqualityinformationstreamfrom1.44Mbpsto128Kbps.Theresulting datastreamwillbeconvolutionallyencodedwithhalf-rateK=7errorcoding,interleaved,dividedinto blocksandblock-errorencodedwith10percentdepthReed-Solomoncode.TheCDRadiosystem willbeabletoprovideapproximately30CDqualitystereochannels.Inaddition,five128Kbps channelswillbesubdividedinto32Kbpschannelstobeusedforvoiceprogramming.Standard voicecodecsl31willbeusedto'provide20FMaudio-qualitychannels.Flexibilitywillbemaintained onthesechannelssothattheycanbesubdividedfurther(i.e.,16Kbps,8Kbps,4Kbps,2Kbps,1 Kbps,0.5Kbps)toprovideauxiliaryservicessuchaspaging,lightaircraftweatheradvisory,GPS differentialdataandnationalemergencyalerting.Compressionofthistypeofinformationwouldbe use-specific.AtleastsomeofsuchauxiliaryservicedatawouldbeencodedusingLinearPredictive Coding("LPC,,).132 44. The SDARSOrderdoesnotsetaspecificPFDlimitonSDARS.Instead,the CommissionexpectsthatappropriatePFDlimitswillbeestablishedthroughinternational coordinationwithadjacentcountries.AccordingtoSection25.114(c)(lI)oftheCommission's rules,however,SDARSapplicantsarerequiredtoidentifyPFDattheEarth'ssurfacefromtheir spacecraft.133Initsamendmenttoitsapplication.CDRadiocomplieswiththeCommission'srulesby providing-thePFDwithinitscoveragearea.AlthoughtheborderPFDvalueiscriticalforpurposes ofinternationalcoordination,tocomplywiththeintentofSection25.114(c)(l1),andforthe purposesofdomesticcoordination,CDRadioshouldprovidemaximum(peak)PFDvaluewithinits coveragearea.CDRadiorecognizesthatthereportedPFDvalueswilltriggertherequirementto coordinatewithradiocommunicationssystemsofothercountries.IntheabsenceofasetofPFD limitsforthe2320-2332.5MHzband,CDRadio'slicensetoprovideSDARSisconditionedupon completionofsuccessfulcoordinationbetweentheCDRadioSDARSsystemandtheforeign systems. 45. The SDARSOrderrequiresSDARSlicenseestomeetout-of-bandandspurious emissionlimitscontainedinSection25.202(f)oftheCommission'srules.134Initstheamendmentto 130 SDARSOrderat 108. 131 Codecsisatennusedforcoderidecoder. 13: Amendmentat23. mSOARSOrderat 113and114. SDARSOrderat 118. 7991 FederalCommunicationsCommission DA97-2191 itslicenseapplication.CDRadioverifiesthatitsproposedsystemwillsuppressout-of-bandspurious emissionstothelevelsspecifiedinSection25.202(1).135Initsupdatedamendment,CDRadiostates thatitwillcoordinateitsSDARSsystemfrequencyuseinordertopreventthepotentialfor unacceptableinterference.I]/:> 46. TheSDARSOrderrequiresSDARSlicenseestoaccommodatetelemetrybeaconsfor theirsystemswithintheirexclusively-licensedbandwidth.butallowseachlicenseetheflexibilityto determinetheappropriateamountofspectrumnecessaryforitstelemetrybeacons.137CDRadio appearstocomplywiththisrequirementbylocatingitstelemetrybeaconswithinabandwidthof200 KHzat2320.25MHz.138 47. IntheSDARSOrder,theCommissionpermitsanSDARSlicensee.pursuanttoan agreementwiththeotherSDARSlicensee.totransmitoncross-polarizedfrequenciesinfrequency assignedtotheotherSDARSlicensee.TheCommissionstipulatedthatthepartieswhoreachsuch anagreementwouldberequiredtoapplytotheCommissionforagreementapproval.I39CDRadio statesthatatthistimeitdoesnotintendtoemploycross-polarizationwithinitsfrequencyassignment andwilloperateonleft-handcircularpolarization(ltLHCplt).CDRadioisrequiredtoapplytothe
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-208380A7.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-208380A7.txt
  • 2,520 4,021 542 0.46 2.89 5.82 7.00 6 20 23 29 29Argentina 779 3,150 30 3,959 1,128 0.24 0.46 0.76 1.34 6 21 28 27 23Colombia 1,391 2,273 24 3,688 1,313 0.61 1.26 1.54 3.11 7 22 15 17 17Taiwan 1,647 1,837 48 3,532 4,580 0.87 0.71 1.64 2.32 7 23 n.a. 21 18India 1,453 1,986 23 3,462 734 0.72 1.44 1.77 2.50 1 24 17 18 12Italy 2,650 709 92 3,451 1,765 3.31 2.60 2.09 2.34 9 25 26 28 27Russia 1,528 1,484 40 3,052 439 1.00 1.53 2.38 3.53 7 26 22 25 22China 1,673 1,320 21 3,014 1,223 1.25 1.92 3.56 4.27 4 27 20 14 13Dominican Republic 2,297 556 0 2,853 633 4.13 5.17 3.10 2.15 2
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-215526A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-215526A1.txt
  • Day 2.27 1.50 (33.9) 2.27 2.69 18.5 Evening 1.36 1.25 (8.1) 1.36 2.69 97.8 Night & Weekend 0.90 0.80 (11.1) 0.90 2.69 198.9 431 - 925 Day 2.34 1.50 (35.9) 2.34 2.69 15.0 Evening 1.40 1.25 (10.7) 1.40 2.69 92.1 Night & Weekend 0.93 0.80 (14.0) 0.93 2.69 189.2 926 - 1910 Day 2.40 1.50 (37.5) 2.40 2.69 12.1 Evening 1.44 1.25 (13.2) 1.44 2.69 86.8 Night & Weekend 0.96 0.80 (16.7) 0.96 2.69 180.2 1911 - 3000 Day 2.70 1.50 (44.4) 2.70 2.69 (0.4) Evening 1.62 1.25 (22.8) 1.62 2.69 66.0 Night & Weekend 1.08 0.80 (25.9) 1.08 2.69 149.1 3001 - 4250 Day 2.80 1.50 (46.4) 2.80 2.69 (3.9) Evening 1.68 1.25 (25.6) 1.68 2.69 60.1 Night & Weekend
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-249262A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-249262A1.txt
  • 0.70 0.60 0.46 Hong Kong 1.60 1.20 1.00 1.00 0.94 0.79 0.72 India 2.00 1.90 1.80 1.80 1.60 1.42 1.28 1.08 0.85 0.68 0.46 0.46 Israel 2.28 2.16 2.16 1.90 1.18 0.70 0.59 Italy 1.65 1.51 1.22 0.71 0.52 0.33 Jamaica 1.55 1.50 1.40 1.40 1.30 1.25 1.25 1.05 0.60 Japan 1.31 1.04 0.94 0.94 0.91 0.86 Korea, Rep. 1.60 1.44 1.41 1.26 1.23 0.98 0.85 0.71 0.51 Mexico 19/ 0.72 0.68 0.58 0.53 0.485 0.395 0.37 0.19 0.19 0.19 0.19 0.19 Morocco 3.03 3.04 3.27 1.78 1.45 1.09 0.83 0.82 0.77 0.38 Netherlands 0.69 0.69 0.59 0.37 0.36 0.27 Nigeria 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.40 1.15 0.77 0.51 Pakistan 2.30 2.30 2.30 2.30 2.20 2.00 1.20 1.20 0.84
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-261024A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-261024A2.txt
  • 1.25 1.20 1.20 1.20 1.20 1.00 0.92 0.70 0.60 0.46 Hong Kong 1.20 1.00 1.00 0.94 0.79 0.72 India 1.90 1.80 1.80 1.60 1.42 1.28 1.08 0.85 0.68 0.46 0.46 Israel 2.16 2.16 1.90 1.18 0.70 0.59 Italy 1.51 1.22 0.71 0.52 0.33 Jamaica 1.50 1.40 1.40 1.30 1.25 1.25 1.05 0.60 Japan 1.04 0.94 0.94 0.91 0.86 Korea, Rep. 1.44 1.41 1.26 1.23 0.98 0.85 0.71 0.51 Mexico 20/ 0.68 0.58 0.53 0.485 0.395 0.37 0.19 0.19 0.19 0.19 0.19 Morocco 3.04 3.27 1.78 1.45 1.09 0.83 0.82 0.77 0.38 Netherlands 0.69 0.59 0.37 0.36 0.27 Nigeria 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.40 1.15 0.77 0.51 Pakistan 2.30 2.30 2.30 2.20 2.00 1.20 1.20 0.84 0.54 0.42 0.42 Peru 1.40
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A1.txt
  • 1,899 3,210 1.10 Oregon 1,000 1,600 2,599 469 269 738 1,469 1,868 3,337 1.15 Pennsylvania 3,360 6,078 9,438 1,479 1,170 2,649 4,839 7,248 12,087 4.15 Puerto Rico 593 1,446 2,039 222 195 417 815 1,642 2,456 0.84 Rhode Island 285 503 789 112 64 176 398 567 965 0.33 South Carolina 1,161 2,198 3,360 492 336 827 1,653 2,534 4,187 1.44 South Dakota 195 317 512 93 63 156 288 380 668 0.23 Tennessee 1,526 2,933 4,459 632 374 1,007 2,158 3,307 5,466 1.88 Texas 5,238 11,699 16,937 2,430 2,141 4,571 7,668 13,840 21,508 7.39 Utah 588 988 1,576 268 143 410 856 1,130 1,986 0.68 Vermont 208 281 489 98 42 140 306 323 629 0.22 Virgin Islands 70 61
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A3.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A3.txt
  • 1,899 3,210 1.10 Oregon 1,000 1,600 2,599 469 269 738 1,469 1,868 3,337 1.15 Pennsylvania 3,360 6,078 9,438 1,479 1,170 2,649 4,839 7,248 12,087 4.15 Puerto Rico 593 1,446 2,039 222 195 417 815 1,642 2,456 0.84 Rhode Island 285 503 789 112 64 176 398 567 965 0.33 South Carolina 1,161 2,198 3,360 492 336 827 1,653 2,534 4,187 1.44 South Dakota 195 317 512 93 63 156 288 380 668 0.23 Tennessee 1,526 2,933 4,459 632 374 1,007 2,158 3,307 5,466 1.88 Texas 5,238 11,699 16,937 2,430 2,141 4,571 7,668 13,840 21,508 7.39 Utah 588 988 1,576 268 143 410 856 1,130 1,986 0.68 Vermont 208 281 489 98 42 140 306 323 629 0.22 Virgin Islands 70 61
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A5.txt
  • 361413 A MID STATE TEL. CO. DBA KMP TEL. CO. 10.80 -1.08 12.00 42.10 361414 C LAKEDALE TELEPHONE COMPANY 5.78 -0.99 6.83 0.00 361419 A LISMORE COOPERATIVE TELEPHONE CO. 3.65 -2.03 5.80 7.50 361422 A LONSDALE TELEPHONE COMPANY 14.10 3.18 10.58 INFINITE 361423 A LOWRY TELEPHONE COMPANY, LLC 16.08 2.34 13.43 74.23 361424 A MABEL COOPERATIVE TELEPHONE CO.- MN 6.38 -1.44 7.93 17.40 361425 A CHRISTENSEN COMM. CO. DBA MADELIA TEL. CO. 10.07 -3.37 13.91 INFINITE 361426 A MANCHESTER-HARTLAND TELEPHONE CO. -2.18 -8.69 7.13 4.86 361427 A MANKATO CITIZENS TELEPHONE CO DBA HICKORYTECH 0.69 -3.85 4.73 0.00 361430 A MELROSE TELEPHONE COMPANY 13.02 -0.07 13.10 172.76 361431 A MIDWEST TEL. CO. 12.38 -1.76 14.40 63.92 361433 C MID STATE TELEPHONE COMPANY
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A9.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A9.txt
  • 0.20 0.99 0.30 3.82 01/01/99 06/30/99 0.82 0.16 0.98 0.32 3.71 07/01/99 12/31/99 0.37 0.10 0.86 0.28 2.82 01/01/00 06/30/00 0.32 0.10 0.86 0.31 2.85 08/11/00 # 06/30/01 0.23 0.07 0.52 0.26 1.91 07/01/01 12/31/01 0.15 0.07 0.48 0.24 1.71 01/01/02 06/30/02 0.15 0.07 0.47 0.24 1.69 07/01/02 06/30/03 0.02 0.01 0.48 0.22 1.46 07/01/03 06/30/04 0.00 0.00 0.48 0.22 1.44 07/01/04 06/30/05 0.00 0.00 0.50 0.25 1.53 * # Source: Access tariff filings. Minute* Minute Minute* Access Access per Switched Carrier Common Line per Terminating Common Line Rates in Effect Interstate Charges for Switched Access Service Non-Traffic Sensitive Total Charge per Carrier Traffic Sensitive Although the charges took effect on July 1, 2000, some companies made adjustments to the tariffs
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-266857A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-266857A1.txt
  • 1,433 2003 564 768 932 1,142 1,441 2004 562 787 956 1,185 1,460 1980 2.61% 2.32% 2.18% 1.81% 1.51% 1981 2.96 2.52 2.24 1.95 1.55 1982 3.18 2.66 2.19 1.97 1.52 1983 3.13 2.82 2.24 2.02 1.55 1984 2.71 2.44 2.21 1.82 1.51 1985 2.72 2.41 2.20 1.81 1.39 1986 2.94 2.62 2.15 1.83 1.43 1987 3.24 2.57 2.31 1.85 1.44 1988 3.23 2.61 2.31 1.82 1.49 1989 3.05 2.61 2.30 1.88 1.43 1990 3.11 2.77 2.37 1.89 1.48 1991 3.08 2.80 2.28 1.84 1.45 1992 3.35 2.77 2.34 1.88 1.46 1993 3.27 2.70 2.45 1.96 1.53 1994 3.17 2.83 2.36 1.95 1.58 1995 3.38 2.71 2.41 1.99 1.55 1996 3.20 2.94 2.46 2.05 1.57 1997 3.24 3.02 2.53 2.09 1.63
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A1.txt
  • Guam NA NA NA NA NA NA Hawaii 339,281 0.16 0.41 0.22 29 37 Idaho 480,711 0.23 0.43 0.28 36 46 Illinois 5,332,102 2.56 3.31 2.75 354 455 Indiana 3,706,671 1.78 2.12 1.86 241 309 Iowa 1,803,612 0.86 1.42 1.00 129 166 Kansas 1,369,167 0.66 0.43 0.60 78 100 Kentucky 2,323,019 1.11 1.26 1.15 149 191 Louisiana 3,424,254 1.64 0.84 1.44 186 239 Maine 1,589,531 0.76 0.18 0.62 80 102 Maryland 4,684,434 2.25 1.48 2.05 265 340 Massachusetts 7,936,378 3.81 0.44 2.96 382 491 Michigan 4,839,629 2.32 3.96 2.73 352 452 Minnesota 2,224,119 1.07 1.29 1.12 145 186 Mississippi 2,422,780 1.16 0.37 0.96 124 160 Missouri 4,030,200 1.93 3.04 2.21 285 366 Montana 523,177 0.25 0.50 0.31 40 52 Nebraska 832,433
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A3.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A3.txt
  • Guam NA NA NA NA NA NA Hawaii 339,281 0.16 0.41 0.22 29 37 Idaho 480,711 0.23 0.43 0.28 36 46 Illinois 5,332,102 2.56 3.31 2.75 354 455 Indiana 3,706,671 1.78 2.12 1.86 241 309 Iowa 1,803,612 0.86 1.42 1.00 129 166 Kansas 1,369,167 0.66 0.43 0.60 78 100 Kentucky 2,323,019 1.11 1.26 1.15 149 191 Louisiana 3,424,254 1.64 0.84 1.44 186 239 Maine 1,589,531 0.76 0.18 0.62 80 102 Maryland 4,684,434 2.25 1.48 2.05 265 340 Massachusetts 7,936,378 3.81 0.44 2.96 382 491 Michigan 4,839,629 2.32 3.96 2.73 352 452 Minnesota 2,224,119 1.07 1.29 1.12 145 186 Mississippi 2,422,780 1.16 0.37 0.96 124 160 Missouri 4,030,200 1.93 3.04 2.21 285 366 Montana 523,177 0.25 0.50 0.31 40 52 Nebraska 832,433
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A5.txt
  • 9.59 11.12 452179 C GILA RIVER TELECOMMUNICATIONS, INC. 2.49 -7.60 10.92 6.53 452191 C ACCIPITER COMMUNICATIONS, INC. 20.95 4.19 16.09 21.89 452200 C FORT MOJAVE TELECOMMUNICATIONS, INC. 13.04 10.35 2.44 11.02 452226 C MIDVALE TELEPHONE EXCHANGE, INC.-ARIZONA 37.62 21.19 13.56 43.10 452302 C VERIZON CALIFORNIA INC. - AZ 41.25 -1.49 43.39 206.94 453334 C TABLE TOP TELEPHONE COMPANY, INC. 3.56 -1.44 5.08 4.31 454426 C CITIZENS TEL CO-WHITE MT DBA FRONTIER COMM 10.37 -3.27 14.10 31.29 454449 C NAVAJO COMM CO INC DBA FRONTIER NAVAJO COM-AZ 10.90 2.05 8.68 19.27 Unseparated High Cost Loop Unseparated Number NTS Revenue Support Payment NTS Revenue of Requirement Projections in Requirement Loops per Loop Later Year* 3 - 210 Table 3.32 ILEC High-Cost Loop Support
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A9.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A9.txt
  • 0.91 0.20 0.99 0.30 3.82 01/01/99 06/30/99 0.82 0.16 0.98 0.32 3.71 07/01/99 12/31/99 0.37 0.10 0.86 0.28 2.82 01/01/00 06/30/00 0.32 0.10 0.86 0.31 2.85 08/11/00 #06/30/01 0.23 0.07 0.52 0.26 1.91 07/01/01 12/31/01 0.15 0.07 0.48 0.24 1.71 01/01/02 06/30/02 0.15 0.07 0.47 0.24 1.69 07/01/02 06/30/03 0.02 0.01 0.48 0.22 1.46 07/01/03 06/30/04 0.00 0.00 0.48 0.22 1.44 07/01/04 06/30/05 0.00 0.00 0.50 0.25 1.53 07/01/05 06/30/06 0.00 0.00 0.52 0.25 1.59 * # Source: Access tariff filings. Although the charges took effect on July 1, 2000, some companies made adjustments to the tariffs which did not take effect until August 11, 2000. From This table shows average rates (weighted by minutes of use) for all local exchange
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-270407A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-270407A1.txt
  • 0.91 0.20 0.99 0.30 3.82 01/01/99 06/30/99 0.82 0.16 0.98 0.32 3.71 07/01/99 12/31/99 0.37 0.10 0.86 0.28 2.82 01/01/00 06/30/00 0.32 0.10 0.86 0.31 2.85 08/11/00 06/31/004 0.23 0.07 0.52 0.26 1.91 07/01/01 12/31/01 0.15 0.07 0.48 0.24 1.71 01/01/02 06/30/02 0.15 0.07 0.47 0.24 1.69 07/01/02 06/30/03 0.02 0.01 0.48 0.22 1.46 07/01/03 06/30/04 0.00 0.00 0.48 0.22 1.44 07/01/04 06/30/05 0.00 0.00 0.50 0.25 1.53 07/01/05 06/30/06 0.00 0.00 0.52 0.25 1.59 07/01/06 06/30/07 0.01 0.00 0.54 0.25 1.63 Source: Access tariff filings. 4 Although the charges took effect on July 1, 2000, some companies made adjustments to the tariffs which did not take effect until August 11, 2000. 1 This table shows average rates (weighted by minutes
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A1.txt
  • 1.02 Georgia 4,416,698 87.8 1.14 Guam 65,044 0.0 NA Hawaii 632,638 99.8 1.00 Idaho 694,630 90.3 1.11 Illinois 6,944,463 95.0 1.05 Indiana 3,317,961 95.3 1.05 Iowa 1,468,226 80.8 1.24 Kansas 1,284,666 82.2 1.22 Kentucky 1,904,145 91.3 1.10 Louisiana 2,002,682 91.4 1.09 Maine 767,662 81.8 1.22 Maryland 3,483,388 99.8 1.00 Massachusetts 3,529,151 99.9 1.00 Michigan 5,105,300 96.0 1.04 Minnesota 2,565,929 69.4 1.44 Mississippi 1,250,753 92.6 1.08 Missouri 3,081,156 90.0 1.11 Montana 480,860 65.4 1.53 Nebraska 764,517 77.4 1.29 Nevada 1,248,633 95.3 1.05 New Hampshire 719,375 92.4 1.08 New Jersey 5,577,359 99.8 1.00 New Mexico 909,041 84.4 1.18 New York 10,230,291 96.3 1.04 North Carolina 4,362,919 89.2 1.12 North Dakota 332,667 51.1 1.96 N. Mariana Islands 22,770 0.0 NA Ohio 5,887,158 94.8 1.05
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A3.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A3.txt
  • 1.02 Georgia 4,416,698 87.8 1.14 Guam 65,044 0.0 NA Hawaii 632,638 99.8 1.00 Idaho 694,630 90.3 1.11 Illinois 6,944,463 95.0 1.05 Indiana 3,317,961 95.3 1.05 Iowa 1,468,226 80.8 1.24 Kansas 1,284,666 82.2 1.22 Kentucky 1,904,145 91.3 1.10 Louisiana 2,002,682 91.4 1.09 Maine 767,662 81.8 1.22 Maryland 3,483,388 99.8 1.00 Massachusetts 3,529,151 99.9 1.00 Michigan 5,105,300 96.0 1.04 Minnesota 2,565,929 69.4 1.44 Mississippi 1,250,753 92.6 1.08 Missouri 3,081,156 90.0 1.11 Montana 480,860 65.4 1.53 Nebraska 764,517 77.4 1.29 Nevada 1,248,633 95.3 1.05 New Hampshire 719,375 92.4 1.08 New Jersey 5,577,359 99.8 1.00 New Mexico 909,041 84.4 1.18 New York 10,230,291 96.3 1.04 North Carolina 4,362,919 89.2 1.12 North Dakota 332,667 51.1 1.96 N. Mariana Islands 22,770 0.0 NA Ohio 5,887,158 94.8 1.05
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A5.txt
  • 0.32 0.13 0.12 0.77 Indiana 0.30 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.36 0.59 0.25 1.51 Iowa 0.95 0.12 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.43 0.22 1.01 3.73 Kansas 4.37 0.13 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.35 0.27 0.80 7.93 Kentucky 1.03 0.02 0.00 0.65 0.00 0.95 0.68 0.24 3.55 Louisiana 2.00 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.91 0.35 0.18 3.45 Maine 0.80 0.01 0.00 0.19 0.00 1.44 0.01 0.81 3.26 Maryland 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.06 0.02 0.11 Massachusetts 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.04 0.01 0.06 Michigan 0.37 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.30 0.01 0.14 0.82 Minnesota 1.14 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.27 0.10 0.59 3.13 Mississippi 0.90 0.01 0.00 5.88 0.00 0.49 0.73 0.17 8.18 Missouri 0.99 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.76
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A9.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A9.txt
  • 0.91 0.20 0.99 0.30 3.82 01/01/99 06/30/99 0.82 0.16 0.98 0.32 3.71 07/01/99 12/31/99 0.37 0.10 0.86 0.28 2.82 01/01/00 06/30/00 0.32 0.10 0.86 0.31 2.85 08/11/00 #06/30/01 0.23 0.07 0.52 0.26 1.91 07/01/01 12/31/01 0.15 0.07 0.48 0.24 1.71 01/01/02 06/30/02 0.15 0.07 0.47 0.24 1.69 07/01/02 06/30/03 0.02 0.01 0.48 0.22 1.46 07/01/03 06/30/04 0.00 0.00 0.48 0.22 1.44 07/01/04 06/30/05 0.00 0.00 0.50 0.25 1.53 07/01/05 06/30/06 0.00 0.00 0.52 0.25 1.59 07/01/06 06/30/07 0.01 0.00 0.54 0.25 1.63 * # Source: Access tariff filings. Although the charges took effect on July 1, 2000, some companies made adjustments to the tariffs which did not take effect until August 11, 2000. From This table shows average rates (weighted by
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-284932A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-284932A1.txt
  • 0.91 0.20 0.99 0.30 3.82 01/01/99 06/30/99 0.82 0.16 0.98 0.32 3.71 07/01/99 12/31/99 0.37 0.10 0.86 0.28 2.82 01/01/00 06/30/00 0.32 0.10 0.86 0.31 2.85 08/11/00 06/31/004 0.23 0.07 0.52 0.26 1.91 07/01/01 12/31/01 0.15 0.07 0.48 0.24 1.71 01/01/02 06/30/02 0.15 0.07 0.47 0.24 1.69 07/01/02 06/30/03 0.02 0.01 0.48 0.22 1.46 07/01/03 06/30/04 0.00 0.00 0.48 0.22 1.44 07/01/04 06/30/05 0.00 0.00 0.50 0.25 1.53 07/01/05 06/30/06 0.00 0.00 0.52 0.25 1.59 07/01/06 06/30/07 0.01 0.00 0.54 0.25 1.63 07/01/07 06/30/08 0.01 0.00 0.56 0.26 1.71 Source: Access tariff filings. Rates in Effect From To Sensitive per Switched Interstate Charges for Switched Access Service Minute 2 Traffic Sensitive per Switched Minute Non-Traffic Minute 1 Carrier Common Line per
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-284934A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-284934A1.txt
  • 1,460 2005 596 847 1,035 1,227 1,532 2006 634 862 1,089 1,297 1,551 1980 2.61% 2.32% 2.18% 1.81% 1.51% 1981 2.96 2.52 2.24 1.95 1.55 1982 3.18 2.66 2.19 1.97 1.52 1983 3.13 2.82 2.24 2.02 1.55 1984 2.71 2.44 2.21 1.82 1.51 1985 2.72 2.41 2.20 1.81 1.39 1986 2.94 2.62 2.15 1.83 1.43 1987 3.24 2.57 2.31 1.85 1.44 1988 3.23 2.61 2.31 1.82 1.49 1989 3.05 2.61 2.30 1.88 1.43 1990 3.11 2.77 2.37 1.89 1.48 1991 3.08 2.80 2.28 1.84 1.45 1992 3.35 2.77 2.34 1.88 1.46 1993 3.27 2.70 2.45 1.96 1.53 1994 3.17 2.83 2.36 1.95 1.58 1995 3.38 2.71 2.41 1.99 1.55 1996 3.20 2.94 2.46 2.05 1.57 1997 3.24 3.02 2.53 2.09 1.63
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287688A1.pdf
  • 1,946 3,240 1.09 Oregon 971 1,688 2,658 443 265 707 1,413 1,953 3,366 1.13 Pennsylvania 3,326 6,191 9,517 1,482 1,036 2,518 4,808 7,227 12,035 4.05 Puerto Rico 712 1,529 2,241 273 183 456 986 1,712 2,698 0.91 Rhode Island 266 562 828 107 77 184 373 639 1,012 0.34 South Carolina 1,156 2,294 3,451 460 365 825 1,617 2,659 4,276 1.44 South Dakota 208 366 574 94 74 168 302 440 743 0.25 Tennessee 1,629 3,322 4,951 612 432 1,044 2,241 3,754 5,995 2.02 Texas 5,495 12,653 18,148 2,530 2,140 4,670 8,025 14,793 22,817 7.68 Utah 619 1,087 1,706 289 165 454 908 1,252 2,160 0.73 Vermont 202 324 526 95 49 144 297 373 670 0.23 Virgin Islands 101 73
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287688A1.pdf
  • 193,414,736 607,850 318.19 0 0.000 310702 C Y CENTURYTEL MICHIGAN CenturyTel, Inc. 26,309,450 50,823 517.67 3,636,339 0.332 310703 A Y KALEVA TEL CO 1,205,227 2,288 526.76 177,223 0.016 310704 C Y ACE TEL OF MICHIGAN 3,272,491 5,339 612.94 756,024 0.069 310705 C Y CENTURY-NORTHN MICH. CenturyTel, Inc. 1,581,916 2,910 543.61 260,755 0.024 310708 C Y LENNON TEL CO 1,311,883 1,310 1,001.44 567,203 0.052 310711 C Y MIDWAY TEL CO Hiawatha Communications, Inc. 756,444 879 860.57 287,720 0.026 310713 C Y HIAWATHA TEL CO Hiawatha Communications, Inc. 3,952,586 7,683 514.46 533,681 0.049 310714 C Y OGDEN TEL CO 270,118 429 629.64 66,121 0.006 310717 C Y ONTONAGON COUNTY TEL Hiawatha Communications, Inc. 1,664,985 3,962 420.24 32,566 0.003 310720 C Y PENINSULA TEL
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287688A3.pdf
  • 1,946 3,240 1.09 Oregon 971 1,688 2,658 443 265 707 1,413 1,953 3,366 1.13 Pennsylvania 3,326 6,191 9,517 1,482 1,036 2,518 4,808 7,227 12,035 4.05 Puerto Rico 712 1,529 2,241 273 183 456 986 1,712 2,698 0.91 Rhode Island 266 562 828 107 77 184 373 639 1,012 0.34 South Carolina 1,156 2,294 3,451 460 365 825 1,617 2,659 4,276 1.44 South Dakota 208 366 574 94 74 168 302 440 743 0.25 Tennessee 1,629 3,322 4,951 612 432 1,044 2,241 3,754 5,995 2.02 Texas 5,495 12,653 18,148 2,530 2,140 4,670 8,025 14,793 22,817 7.68 Utah 619 1,087 1,706 289 165 454 908 1,252 2,160 0.73 Vermont 202 324 526 95 49 144 297 373 670 0.23 Virgin Islands 101 73
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287688A5.pdf
  • 193,414,736 607,850 318.19 0 0.000 310702 C Y CENTURYTEL MICHIGAN CenturyTel, Inc. 26,309,450 50,823 517.67 3,636,339 0.332 310703 A Y KALEVA TEL CO 1,205,227 2,288 526.76 177,223 0.016 310704 C Y ACE TEL OF MICHIGAN 3,272,491 5,339 612.94 756,024 0.069 310705 C Y CENTURY-NORTHN MICH. CenturyTel, Inc. 1,581,916 2,910 543.61 260,755 0.024 310708 C Y LENNON TEL CO 1,311,883 1,310 1,001.44 567,203 0.052 310711 C Y MIDWAY TEL CO Hiawatha Communications, Inc. 756,444 879 860.57 287,720 0.026 310713 C Y HIAWATHA TEL CO Hiawatha Communications, Inc. 3,952,586 7,683 514.46 533,681 0.049 310714 C Y OGDEN TEL CO 270,118 429 629.64 66,121 0.006 310717 C Y ONTONAGON COUNTY TEL Hiawatha Communications, Inc. 1,664,985 3,962 420.24 32,566 0.003 310720 C Y PENINSULA TEL
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287688A5.pdf
  • FRONTIER -4.49 -3.65 -0.87 -88.63 452173 C TOHONO O'ODHAM UTILITY AUTHORITY 2.66 4.02 -1.31 -0.91 452174 C SOUTHWESTERN TEL. CO. 0.78 -2.74 3.62 2.92 452176 C VALLEY TELEPHONE COOPERATIVE INC-AZ -2.65 -6.44 4.05 -2.18 452179 C GILA RIVER TELECOMMUNICATIONS, INC. 26.38 1.01 25.12 42.14 452191 C ACCIPITER COMMUNICATIONS, INC. -2.48 -1.95 -0.53 -2.69 452200 C FORT MOJAVE TELECOMMUNICATIONS, INC. 17.80 1.44 16.12 27.98 452226 C MIDVALE TELEPHONE EXCHANGE, INC.-ARIZONA 3.38 4.55 -1.12 1.63 452302 C VERIZON CALIFORNIA INC. - AZ 4.42 -5.56 10.57 67.79 453334 C TABLE TOP TELEPHONE COMPANY, INC. -4.37 -2.68 -1.74 -9.28 Requirement Loops per Loop Later Year* NTS Revenue of Requirement Projections in Unseparated High Cost Loop Unseparated Number NTS Revenue Support Payment 3 - 165 Table
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287688A9.pdf
  • 5.18 01/01/9806/30/98 0.68 0.23 1.29 0.21 4.04 07/01/9812/31/98 0.91 0.20 0.99 0.30 3.82 01/01/9906/30/99 0.82 0.16 0.98 0.32 3.71 07/01/9912/31/99 0.37 0.10 0.86 0.28 2.82 01/01/0006/30/00 0.32 0.10 0.86 0.31 2.85 08/11/0006/31/004 0.23 0.07 0.52 0.26 1.91 07/01/0112/31/01 0.15 0.07 0.48 0.24 1.71 01/01/0206/30/02 0.15 0.07 0.47 0.24 1.69 07/01/0206/30/03 0.02 0.01 0.48 0.22 1.46 07/01/0306/30/04 0.00 0.00 0.48 0.22 1.44 07/01/0406/30/05 0.00 0.00 0.50 0.25 1.53 07/01/0506/30/06 0.00 0.00 0.52 0.25 1.59 07/01/0606/30/07 0.01 0.00 0.54 0.25 1.63 07/01/0706/30/08 0.01 0.00 0.56 0.26 1.71 Source: Access tariff filings. Rates in Effect From To Sensitive per Switched Interstate Charges for Switched Access Service Minute 2 Traffic Sensitive per Switched Minute Non-Traffic Minute 1 Carrier Common Line per Terminating Access Minute 1
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A1.txt
  • 1,980 3,297 1.10 Oregon 981 1,746 2,728 476 252 728 1,457 1,999 3,456 1.15 Pennsylvania 3,359 6,330 9,689 1,604 967 2,571 4,963 7,296 12,260 4.09 Puerto Rico 731 1,383 2,113 287 138 425 1,018 1,520 2,538 0.85 Rhode Island 277 579 856 120 71 191 397 650 1,047 0.35 South Carolina 1,196 2,289 3,484 495 335 830 1,690 2,624 4,314 1.44 South Dakota 229 360 588 104 65 169 333 424 757 0.25 Tennessee 1,631 3,251 4,881 635 387 1,021 2,265 3,637 5,902 1.97 Texas 5,672 12,658 18,330 2,753 1,859 4,611 8,424 14,517 22,941 7.66 Utah 625 1,121 1,746 315 155 471 941 1,276 2,217 0.74 Vermont 203 339 542 102 47 149 305 386 691 0.23 Virgin Islands 88 76
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A1.txt
  • 310692DRENTHE TEL CO 439.57 446.39 468.92 469.22 478.77 310694FARMERS DBA CHAPIN 442.82 448.04 472.33 478.36 488.34 310695VERIZON NORTH-MI 311.80 322.18 313.63 318.19 335.44 310702CENTURYTEL MICHIGAN 451.17 470.70 497.92 517.67 550.83 310703KALEVA TEL CO 447.21 471.04 502.76 526.76 523.76 310704ACE TEL OF MICHIGAN 478.87 513.64 551.60 612.94 691.69 310705CENTURY-NORTHN MICH. 491.95 507.73 537.33 543.61 546.80 310708LENNON TEL CO 896.84 1,009.06 1,024.48 1,001.44 1,081.39 310711MIDWAY TEL CO 955.22 978.67 987.78 860.57 850.51 310713HIAWATHA TEL CO 459.08 469.15 512.72 514.46 588.45 3 - 238 Study Area CodeStudy Area Name 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 Table 3.35 Unseparated ILEC NTS Revenue Requirement per Loop by Study Area ($) MICHIGAN (CONT.) 310714OGDEN TEL CO 658.85 587.79 593.81 629.64 664.48 310717ONTONAGON COUNTY TEL 405.02 411.05 429.37 420.24
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A3.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A3.txt
  • 1,980 3,297 1.10 Oregon 981 1,746 2,728 476 252 728 1,457 1,999 3,456 1.15 Pennsylvania 3,359 6,330 9,689 1,604 967 2,571 4,963 7,296 12,260 4.09 Puerto Rico 731 1,383 2,113 287 138 425 1,018 1,520 2,538 0.85 Rhode Island 277 579 856 120 71 191 397 650 1,047 0.35 South Carolina 1,196 2,289 3,484 495 335 830 1,690 2,624 4,314 1.44 South Dakota 229 360 588 104 65 169 333 424 757 0.25 Tennessee 1,631 3,251 4,881 635 387 1,021 2,265 3,637 5,902 1.97 Texas 5,672 12,658 18,330 2,753 1,859 4,611 8,424 14,517 22,941 7.66 Utah 625 1,121 1,746 315 155 471 941 1,276 2,217 0.74 Vermont 203 339 542 102 47 149 305 386 691 0.23 Virgin Islands 88 76
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A5.txt
  • 0.00 0.04 Dist. of Columbia 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Florida 0.07 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.07 0.37 0.03 0.54 Georgia 0.57 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.92 0.35 0.22 2.08 Guam 0.79 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 7.93 0.00 0.00 8.72 Hawaii 3.89 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.07 0.22 0.23 6.41 Idaho 2.51 0.05 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.44 1.74 0.77 6.50 Illinois 0.25 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.34 0.14 0.14 0.87 Indiana 0.43 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.57 0.44 0.21 1.66 Iowa 1.29 0.11 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.86 0.39 0.82 4.49 Kansas 5.65 0.12 0.02 0.00 0.00 2.99 0.28 0.64 9.71 Kentucky 1.24 0.05 0.00 0.55 0.00 0.98 0.54 0.20 3.57 Louisiana 2.51 0.05 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.15
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A5.txt
  • 310692DRENTHE TEL CO 439.57 446.39 468.92 469.22 478.77 310694FARMERS DBA CHAPIN 442.82 448.04 472.33 478.36 488.34 310695VERIZON NORTH-MI 311.80 322.18 313.63 318.19 335.44 310702CENTURYTEL MICHIGAN 451.17 470.70 497.92 517.67 550.83 310703KALEVA TEL CO 447.21 471.04 502.76 526.76 523.76 310704ACE TEL OF MICHIGAN 478.87 513.64 551.60 612.94 691.69 310705CENTURY-NORTHN MICH. 491.95 507.73 537.33 543.61 546.80 310708LENNON TEL CO 896.84 1,009.06 1,024.48 1,001.44 1,081.39 310711MIDWAY TEL CO 955.22 978.67 987.78 860.57 850.51 310713HIAWATHA TEL CO 459.08 469.15 512.72 514.46 588.45 3 - 238 Study Area CodeStudy Area Name 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 Table 3.35 Unseparated ILEC NTS Revenue Requirement per Loop by Study Area ($) MICHIGAN (CONT.) 310714OGDEN TEL CO 658.85 587.79 593.81 629.64 664.48 310717ONTONAGON COUNTY TEL 405.02 411.05 429.37 420.24
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A9.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A9.txt
  • 0.91 0.20 0.99 0.30 3.82 01/01/99 06/30/99 0.82 0.16 0.98 0.32 3.71 07/01/99 12/31/99 0.37 0.10 0.86 0.28 2.82 01/01/00 06/30/00 0.32 0.10 0.86 0.31 2.85 08/11/00 06/31/004 0.23 0.07 0.52 0.26 1.91 07/01/01 12/31/01 0.15 0.07 0.48 0.24 1.71 01/01/02 06/30/02 0.15 0.07 0.47 0.24 1.69 07/01/02 06/30/03 0.02 0.01 0.48 0.22 1.46 07/01/03 06/30/04 0.00 0.00 0.48 0.22 1.44 07/01/04 06/30/05 0.00 0.00 0.50 0.25 1.53 07/01/05 06/30/06 0.00 0.00 0.52 0.25 1.59 07/01/06 06/30/07 0.01 0.00 0.54 0.25 1.63 07/01/07 06/30/08 0.01 0.00 0.56 0.26 1.71 07/01/08 06/30/09 0.01 0.00 0.63 0.24 1.77 07/01/09 06/30/10 0.00 0.00 0.64 0.26 1.85 Source: Access tariff filings. Rates in Effect From To Sensitive per Switched Interstate Charges for Switched Access Service
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-301823A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-301823A1.txt
  • 0.91 0.20 0.99 0.30 3.82 01/01/99 06/30/99 0.82 0.16 0.98 0.32 3.71 07/01/99 12/31/99 0.37 0.10 0.86 0.28 2.82 01/01/00 06/30/00 0.32 0.10 0.86 0.31 2.85 08/11/00 06/31/004 0.23 0.07 0.52 0.26 1.91 07/01/01 12/31/01 0.15 0.07 0.48 0.24 1.71 01/01/02 06/30/02 0.15 0.07 0.47 0.24 1.69 07/01/02 06/30/03 0.02 0.01 0.48 0.22 1.46 07/01/03 06/30/04 0.00 0.00 0.48 0.22 1.44 07/01/04 06/30/05 0.00 0.00 0.50 0.25 1.53 07/01/05 06/30/06 0.00 0.00 0.52 0.25 1.59 07/01/06 06/30/07 0.01 0.00 0.54 0.25 1.63 07/01/07 06/30/08 0.01 0.00 0.56 0.26 1.71 07/01/08 06/30/09 0.01 0.00 0.63 0.24 1.80 07/01/09 06/30/10 0.00 0.00 0.64 0.26 1.85 Source: Access tariff filings. Rates in Effect From To Sensitive per Switched Interstate Charges for Switched Access Service
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303886A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303886A1.txt
  • 0 389 43 652 0.41 Idaho 220 37 1 392 50 700 0.44 Illinois 2,012 494 6 3,705 460 6,675 4.23 Indiana 964 168 3 1,680 220 3,035 1.92 Iowa 420 92 2 782 96 1,392 0.88 Kansas 353 125 1 810 81 1,371 0.87 Kentucky 558 148 2 1,165 127 2,000 1.27 Louisiana 618 146 2 1,357 141 2,265 1.44 Maine 209 63 0 339 48 659 0.42 Maryland 1,010 256 2 1,785 231 3,284 2.08 Massachusetts 944 477 2 1,959 216 3,598 2.28 Michigan 1,345 432 4 2,725 307 4,813 3.05 Minnesota 726 262 3 1,451 166 2,607 1.65 Mississippi 368 55 2 785 84 1,293 0.82 Missouri 929 156 2 1,684 212 2,984 1.89 Montana 147 30 1
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303886A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303886A1.txt
  • 517.67 550.83 537.92 552.28 310703KALEVA TEL CO 502.76 526.76 523.76 576.71 675.88 310704ACE TEL OF MICHIGAN 551.60 612.94 691.10 690.28 678.22 3 - 244 Study Area CodeStudy Area Name 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Table 3.35 Unseparated ILEC NTS Revenue Requirement per Loop by Study Area ($) MICHIGAN (CONT.) 310705CENTURY-NORTHN MICH. 537.33 543.61 546.80 546.68 546.22 310708LENNON TEL CO 1,024.48 1,001.44 1,081.39 1,078.34 1,089.10 310711MIDWAY TEL CO 987.78 966.08 768.97 1,004.83 1,049.97 310713HIAWATHA TEL CO 488.38 584.75 531.67 634.31 650.33 310714OGDEN TEL CO 593.81 629.65 664.48 907.01 858.33 310717ONTONAGON COUNTY TEL 429.37 428.10 385.54 519.95 578.71 310720PENINSULA TEL CO -MI 423.92 447.25 436.07 411.00 329.32 310721PIGEON TEL CO 636.53 678.42 823.87 841.67 978.61 310725SAND CREEK TEL CO 448.89 453.86 473.14 516.74
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303886A3.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303886A3.txt
  • 0 389 43 652 0.41 Idaho 220 37 1 392 50 700 0.44 Illinois 2,012 494 6 3,705 460 6,675 4.23 Indiana 964 168 3 1,680 220 3,035 1.92 Iowa 420 92 2 782 96 1,392 0.88 Kansas 353 125 1 810 81 1,371 0.87 Kentucky 558 148 2 1,165 127 2,000 1.27 Louisiana 618 146 2 1,357 141 2,265 1.44 Maine 209 63 0 339 48 659 0.42 Maryland 1,010 256 2 1,785 231 3,284 2.08 Massachusetts 944 477 2 1,959 216 3,598 2.28 Michigan 1,345 432 4 2,725 307 4,813 3.05 Minnesota 726 262 3 1,451 166 2,607 1.65 Mississippi 368 55 2 785 84 1,293 0.82 Missouri 929 156 2 1,684 212 2,984 1.89 Montana 147 30 1
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303886A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303886A5.txt
  • TEL COOP INC 7.26 -6.30 14.47 17.88 442069 C ELECTRA TELEPHONE CO -7.64 -6.25 -1.48 -18.35 442070 C ETEX TEL COOP INC 4.52 -3.32 8.10 4.40 442071 C FIVE AREA TEL CO-OP 18.54 -4.97 24.74 56.85 442072 C CONSOLIDATED FT BEND 6.95 -8.39 16.75 70.70 442073 C BORDER TO BORDER -17.10 -13.33 -4.35 -17.45 442076 C GANADO TELEPHONE CO 15.10 -1.44 16.78 21.86 442080 C GTE SW VERIZON-TX 1.54 -10.67 13.67 114.00 442083 C GUADALUPE VALLEY TEL 2.00 -2.66 4.78 -6.06 442084 C UTC OF TEXAS INC -0.74 -6.26 5.88 -17.85 442086 C HILL COUNTRY CO-OP 17.95 -2.91 21.48 42.79 442090 C ALENCO COMMUNICATION 2.69 -3.88 6.83 2.21 3 - 175 Table 3.32 ILEC High-Cost Loop Support Data Percentage Changes from
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303886A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303886A5.txt
  • 517.67 550.83 537.92 552.28 310703KALEVA TEL CO 502.76 526.76 523.76 576.71 675.88 310704ACE TEL OF MICHIGAN 551.60 612.94 691.10 690.28 678.22 3 - 244 Study Area CodeStudy Area Name 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Table 3.35 Unseparated ILEC NTS Revenue Requirement per Loop by Study Area ($) MICHIGAN (CONT.) 310705CENTURY-NORTHN MICH. 537.33 543.61 546.80 546.68 546.22 310708LENNON TEL CO 1,024.48 1,001.44 1,081.39 1,078.34 1,089.10 310711MIDWAY TEL CO 987.78 966.08 768.97 1,004.83 1,049.97 310713HIAWATHA TEL CO 488.38 584.75 531.67 634.31 650.33 310714OGDEN TEL CO 593.81 629.65 664.48 907.01 858.33 310717ONTONAGON COUNTY TEL 429.37 428.10 385.54 519.95 578.71 310720PENINSULA TEL CO -MI 423.92 447.25 436.07 411.00 329.32 310721PIGEON TEL CO 636.53 678.42 823.87 841.67 978.61 310725SAND CREEK TEL CO 448.89 453.86 473.14 516.74
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303886A9.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303886A9.txt
  • 0.91 0.20 0.99 0.30 3.82 01/01/99 06/30/99 0.82 0.16 0.98 0.32 3.71 07/01/99 12/31/99 0.37 0.10 0.86 0.28 2.82 01/01/00 06/30/00 0.32 0.10 0.86 0.31 2.85 08/11/00 06/31/004 0.23 0.07 0.52 0.26 1.91 07/01/01 12/31/01 0.15 0.07 0.48 0.24 1.71 01/01/02 06/30/02 0.15 0.07 0.47 0.24 1.69 07/01/02 06/30/03 0.02 0.01 0.48 0.22 1.46 07/01/03 06/30/04 0.00 0.00 0.48 0.22 1.44 07/01/04 06/30/05 0.00 0.00 0.50 0.25 1.53 07/01/05 06/30/06 0.00 0.00 0.52 0.25 1.59 07/01/06 06/30/07 0.01 0.00 0.54 0.25 1.63 07/01/07 06/30/08 0.01 0.00 0.56 0.26 1.71 07/01/08 06/30/09 0.01 0.00 0.63 0.24 1.80 07/01/09 06/30/10 0.00 0.00 0.64 0.26 1.85 07/01/10 06/30/11 0.00 0.00 0.67 0.27 1.92 Source: Access tariff filings. Rates in Effect From To Sensitive per
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-308828A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-308828A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-308828A1.txt
  • download performance, by provider Actual Sustained Speed (Mbps) Advertised Speed Tier (Mbps) Provider Actual Sustained Speed / Advertised Speed Tier 0.60 0.768 AT&T 78% % 0.69 0.768 Verizon (DSL) 89% 0.73 0.768 TimeWarner 95% 0.97 1 Verizon (DSL) 97% 1.15 1.5 Windstream 77% 1.22 1.5 Qwest 82% 1.24 1.5 AT&T 83% 1.32 1.5 Verizon (DSL) 88% 1.35 1.5 CenturyLink 90% 1.44 1 Comcast 144% 1.90 2 TimeWarner 95% 2.02 3 Frontier 67% 2.34 3 AT&T 78% 2.43 3 Verizon (DSL) 81% 2.60 3 CenturyLink 87% 2.66 3 Windstream 89% 3.20 3 Cox 107% 4.52 5 CenturyLink 90% 4.71 6 AT&T 79% 4.83 7 Qwest 69% 5.02 7 Verizon (DSL) 72% 5.17 6 Windstream 86% 5.97 6 Comcast 99% 6.49 7 TimeWarner
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-311775A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-311775A1.txt
  • New Mexico 8.25 3.23 1.61 9.86 13.09 8.25 3.50 1.75 10.00 13.50 8.25 3.30 1.65 9.90 13.20 New York 8.01 3.30 1.65 9.65 12.95 8.10 3.49 1.75 9.85 13.34 8.07 3.44 1.72 9.79 13.23 North Carolina 7.86 3.50 1.75 9.61 13.11 8.05 3.50 1.75 9.80 13.30 8.01 3.50 1.75 9.76 13.26 North Dakota 8.25 1.94 0.97 9.22 11.17 8.25 2.89 1.44 9.70 12.58 8.25 1.99 0.99 9.25 11.23 N. Mariana Islands 8.25 0.00 0.00 8.25 8.25 8.26 0.00 0.00 8.26 8.26 8.25 0.00 0.00 8.25 8.25 Ohio 7.27 3.49 1.75 9.02 12.51 7.38 3.50 1.75 9.13 12.63 7.34 3.50 1.75 9.09 12.58 Oklahoma 7.41 0.39 0.20 7.60 8.00 7.14 0.95 0.48 7.62 8.57 7.21 0.81 0.41 7.62 8.43 Oregon 8.22 3.48
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-244A5.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-244A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-244A5.txt
  • on 80 Tracks on Each Side - Part 1: Dimensional, Physical and Magnetic Characteristics. ISO/IEC 9529-2:1987, Information Processing Systems - Data Interchange on 90 mm (3.5 in) Flexible Disk Cartridges Using Modified Frequency Modulation Recording at 15916 ftprad on 80 Tracks on Each Side - Part 2: Track Format The cited ISO/IEC standards describe disks having a formatted capacity of 1.44 Mbytes. It is intended to allow the use of disks of other capacities (such as 720 kBytes) based upon the same techniques as and compatible with the disks described in the specified standards. ISO 9660: 1988, Information Processing - Volume and File Structure of CD-ROM for Information Interchange ANSI X3.4-1986 (R1992), Coded Character Set - 7-Bit American National Standard Code
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-76A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-76A1.pdf
  • carrying out its registration responsibilities, and, thus, was obligated to have contacted both the owner and the Commission pursuant to Section 17.6(a) of our Rules, 47 C.F.R. �17.6(a). We further note that WCA did not ask that we stay our rules pending evaluation of its petition. A stay of our Rules is permitted in accordance with 47 C.F.R. �� 1.43, 1.44 (e). See, e.g., Ex Parte Comments of National Spectrum Managers Association at 2 (filed Nov. 6, 1998). Report and Order, 11 FCC Rcd at 4303-5. The Universal Licensing System is the integrated database and automated processing system developed by the WTB to facilitate electronic filing of wireless applications, licensing information, and public access to such information for all wireless radio
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-208A2.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-208A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-208A2.txt
  • Check 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 1a,2a,3a,4a Resale: Provisioning Resale POTS PR-2-04 Avg. Interval Completed - Dispatch (6-9 Lines) 8.72 14.39 8.77 7.29 7.98 7.33 8.40 3.17 1b,2a,3a,4a PR-2-05 Avg. Interval Completed - Dispatch (>= 10 Lines) 10.21 9.44 9.93 14.50 10.59 11.83 10.49 7.50 1a,2a,3a,4a,2n,3n PR-2-01 Avg. Int. Completed - Total No Dispatch - Business 1.06 1.57 1.07 2.56 0.99 1.44 0.72 1.57 PR-2-03 Avg. Int. Completed - Dispatch (1-5 Lines) - Bus. 5.72 5.90 6.07 5.75 5.28 5.25 3.66 4.71 1n PR-2-01 Avg. Int. Completed - Total No Dispatch - Residence 0.70 1.95 0.86 1.72 0.78 1.56 0.74 1.36 PR-2-03 Avg. Int. Completed - Dispatch (1-5 Lines) - Res. 7.25 6.97 7.99 6.78 8.84 9.46 7.58 8.93 3n PR-4-02 Average
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-329A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-329A1.txt
  • J & J Broadcasting Inc 1972 0 0 0 C WDAR FM Soft AC Florence, SC 204Darlington SC Root Communications Group LP 1965 Jul-97 425 5.1 0.7 C3 WJMX AM Nws/Tlk/Spt Florence, SC 204Florence SC Root Communications Group LP 1947 Jul-97 250 3.2 0.7 B WJMX FM CHR Florence, SC 204Cheraw SC Root Communications Group LP 1979 Jul-97 1650 7.4 1.44 C2 WPFM AM Gospel Florence, SC 204Darlington SC Root Communications Group LP 1955 Jul-97 150 0 0 B WSQN FM Oldies Florence, SC 204Scranton SC Root Communications Group LP 1991 Jul-97 525 3.7 1.12 A WDSC AM Gospel Florence, SC 204Dillon SC Root Communications Group LP 1946 Oct-97 25 0 0 B WEGX FM Country Florence, SC 204Dillon SC Root
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-63A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-63A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-63A1.txt
  • spared ourselves the continued litigation and enforcement issues raised in proceedings like this one. At the end of the day, Petrocom simply wishes to provide service to the public. I believe our Gulf licensing delays have unfairly limited that ability. I look forward to a prompt resolution of their petition and an auction of these licenses. 47 C.F.R. �� 1.41, 1.44(e) and 1.115. See Letter to Richard S. Myers, Esq., et al, from Charles E. Dziedzic, Assistant Chief, Video Services Division, Mass Media Bureau (May 15, 2000). See Letter to Richard S. Myers, Esq., et al, from Charles E. Dziedzic, Assistant Chief, Video Services Division, Mass Media Bureau (August 15, 2000). Authorization was granted pursuant to pursuant to 47 C.F.R. �
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-105A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-105A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-105A1.txt
  • Statement at 3, � 11; Starpower-Verizon Virginia Complaint, Exhibit D (First Starpower-Verizon Virginia Agreement) at 8, � 1.61. Starpower-Verizon Virginia Joint Statement at 3, � 12; Starpower-Verizon Virginia Complaint, Exhibit D (First Starpower-Verizon Virginia Agreement) at 2, � 1.7. Starpower-Verizon Virginia Joint Statement at 3-4, � 14; Starpower-Verizon Virginia Complaint, Exhibit D (First Starpower-Verizon Virginia Agreement ) at 6, � 1.44. 47 U.S.C. � 251(b)(5). Implementation of the Local Competition Provisions in the Telecommunications Act of 1996, Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, 11 FCC Rcd 14171, 14249, � 230 (1996) (``Local Competition Order NPRM'') (emphasis added) (subsequent history omitted). Starpower-Verizon Virginia Joint Statement at 3, � 13; Starpower-Verizon Virginia Complaint, Exhibit D (First Starpower-Verizon Virginia Agreement) at 17-18, �� 5.7.2, 5.7.3, 5.7.5.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-107A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-107A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-107A1.txt
  • 0.01 0.02 0.02 No. of satellite channels 42.43 39.92 49.73 41.42 40.81 Standard error 2.12 2.21 0.78 1.53 2.80 Rate per satellite channel $0.796 $1.066 $0.647 $0.870 $0.571 Standard error 0.04 0.12 0.02 0.03 0.04 July 1, 2000 BST $14.43 $10.98 $10.95 $14.76 $12.19 Standard error 1.01 0.40 0.40 0.76 1.25 Major CPST $14.40 $20.46 $18.39 $16.01 $9.23 Standard error 1.44 0.93 0.56 0.95 2.07 Programming total $28.83 $31.44 $29.34 $30.77 $21.42 Standard error 0.97 0.71 0.44 0.49 1.12 Equipment $2.62 $2.81 $3.21 $1.80 $1.98 Standard error 0.25 0.24 0.12 0.17 0.49 Programming and equipment $31.45 $34.25 $32.55 $32.57 $23.40 Standard error 1.07 0.85 0.46 0.50 1.29 Number of channels 52.68 46.50 62.41 49.52 50.81 Standard error 2.35 2.58 0.95 1.66
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-111A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-111A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-111A1.txt
  • Federal/State team has the authority to modify the audit procedures, the information collected and deposited into the auditor's workpapers, and the format for the final report. See Section 272(d) Audit Order at para. 6. Verizon Petition at 10-11 (citing Virginia Petroleum Jobbers Ass'n v. FPC, 259 F.2d p21, 925 (D.C. Cir. 1958)); see Comptel Comments at 12-13. 47 C.F.R. � 1.44(e). We note that the information at issue (i.e., the final audit report itself) has already been publicly released pursuant to the procedures provided in section 0.459 of our rules. See 47 C.F.R. 0.459(g); see also Section 272(d) Audit Order at paras. 23-24; Accounting Safeguards under the Telecommunications Act of 1996: Section 272(d) Biennial Audit Procedures, CC Docket No. 96-150, Memorandum
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-112A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-112A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-112A1.txt
  • Oklahoma Press Publ'g Co v. Walling, 327 U.S. 186, 217 (1946) (rejecting petitioners' argument that agency subpoena power would subject them to impermissible inconvenience, expense, and harrassment precisely because ``they may make appropriate defense surrounded by every safeguard of judicial restraint.'') (internal quotation omitted). See NAL Response at 22-26. See supra n.7. See supra � 3. 47 C.F.R. �� 1.43, 1.44. Moreover, as we discuss above, see supra � 17, even after the issuance of this Forfeiture Order, SBC may choose not to pay the forfeiture and to raise a challenge to our findings in a trial de novo should the Department of Justice prosecute any collection action we may refer. 47 U.S.C. � 408. 47 U.S.C. � 416(c). See Peninsula
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-289A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-289A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-289A1.txt
  • H. Dortch Secretary Havens filed an application for review and a petition for reconsideration in a single joint pleading directed to the Commission and the Bureau. Section 1.104(b) of the Commission's Rules permits the filing of ``either a petition for reconsideration or an application for review (but not both) ....'' 47 C.F.R. � 1.104(b) (2001); see also 47 C.F.R. � 1.44(a) (2001). Because this joint filing violates Section 1.104(b), and given that the arguments raised in the petition for reconsideration are similar in nature to the arguments raised in the application for review, we believe that it is in the public interest to treat the entire filing as an application for review. See William L. Leavell, Memorandum Opinion and Order, 15
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-32A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-32A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-32A1.txt
  • has not yet acted on our motion. Peninsula observes that it filed a motion for stay of our February 2000 MO&O, which, it argues, we never directly addressed. It now ``renews'' its request that the Commission stay its May 2001 MO&O pending a final court determination of Peninsula's appeal. We dismiss Peninsula's request. Peninsula's request does not comply with section 1.44(e) of our rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.44(e), which requires that stay requests be filed as separate pleadings. Moreover, our May 2001 MO&O modified in significant respects the February 2000 MO&O, thereby rendering moot Peninsula's stay request of the February 2000 MO&O. In any event, we note that the mere pendency of such a motion does not give Peninsula the right
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-330A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-330A1.txt
  • work 9.56 14.33 9.88 7.00 9.45 8.76 9.24a cde 7 Resale ISDN BRI no field work 2.99 15.00 3.19 4.81 2.46 1.88abcde 7 Resale PBX field work 8.68 7.18 6.17 7.99 1.33 6.58abcde 7 Resale PBX no field work 7.58 6.36 4.65 5.99 1.00 5.04abcde 7 Resale Residential POTS field work 0.76 1.59 0.73 1.59 0.83 1.51 0.80 1.67 0.68 1.44 7 Resale Residential POTS no field work 0.16 0.54 0.13 0.65 0.14 0.62 0.10 0.74 0.07 0.69 7 Resale VGPL/DS0 field work 13.04 6.0010.20 3.0012.92 10.67 9.87abcde 7 UNE Dark Fiber 30.00 tbd tbd tbd 29.00 tbd tbdabcde 7 UNE Dedicated Transport - DS1- Field Work/No field work 9.0012.07 8.0010.95 11.49 9.2911.95 7.0012.45abcde 7 UNE EELs DS1 - New 6.71
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-331A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-331A1.txt
  • 0.94 2.71 2.30 3.57 1.42 1,5 A.2.1.6.1.1ISDN/<10 circuits/Dispatch/FL (days)22.03 11.80 17.78 8.33 21.29 10.00 5.68 11.51 12.00 1,2,3,5 B - 7 Metric Metric Name [SQM Number] May June July August September Number and Disaggregation BST CLEC BST CLEC BST CLEC BST CLEC BST CLEC Notes Federal Communications Commission FCC 02-331 Florida Performance Metric Data A.2.1.6.1.2ISDN/<10 circuits/Non-Dispatch/FL (days) 2.20 1.20 2.52 1.44 3.23 5.78 2.86 2.61 2.10 2,3,5 A.2.1.6.2.1ISDN/>=10 circuits/Dispatch/FL (days) 11.50 13.33 23.75 27.02 36.00 26.43 8.67 4,5 A.2.1.6.2.2ISDN/>=10 circuits/Non-Dispatch/FL (days) 3.20 9.55 4.61 13.00 23.91 10.58 3.00 3,5 % Jeopardies - Mechanized A.2.4.1 Residence/FL (%) 0.53% 0.24% 0.53% 0.29% 0.53% 0.22% 0.60% 0.31% 0.47% 0.27% A.2.4.2 Business/FL (%) 1.52% 0.68% 1.52% 0.38% 1.31% 0.83% 1.53% 1.32% 1.47% 1.39% A.2.4.3 Design
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-69A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-69A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-69A1.txt
  • amount of $1,750,400.00 prior to the auction. On August 1, 2001, the date of the late payment deadline, Winstar filed its Stay Request. However, Winstar did not submit full payment of the remaining balance of its winning bid plus the applicable late payment penalty by the late payment deadline, and has not tendered payment since that time. 8. Discussion. Section 1.44 of the Commission's Rules gives the Commission discretion to stay an action. Specifically, the provision states that, ``Any request to stay the effectiveness of any decision or order of the Commission shall be filed as a separate pleading.'' Although Winstar has styled its pleading as a request for a stay, we believe that the relief it has requested is analogous
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-241A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-241A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-241A1.txt
  • applying such provision or regulation is consistent with the public interest. 47 U.S.C. � 160(a). The twelve Tier III carriers who petitioned for forbearance are listed in Appendix C. The carriers fully covered by this relief are listed in Appendix A 1. The carriers that are granted their requests only in part are listed in Appendix A 2. See section 1.44(e) of the rules, which gives the Commission the discretion to grant temporary relief. See also generally section 4(i) of the Communications Act of 1936, 47 U.S.C. � 4(i), which authorizes the Commission to issue orders necessary to execute its functions. We note that petitions specifically requesting a stay, pursuant to sections 1.41 and 1.43 of the rules, as well as
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-241A1_Erratum.doc
  • applying such provision or regulation is consistent with the public interest. 47 U.S.C. � 160(a). The twelve Tier III carriers who petitioned for forbearance are listed in Appendix C. The carriers fully covered by this relief are listed in Appendix A 1. The carriers that are granted their requests only in part are listed in Appendix A 2. See section 1.44(e) of the rules, which gives the Commission the discretion to grant temporary relief. See also generally section 4(i) of the Communications Act of 1936, 47 U.S.C. � 4(i), which authorizes the Commission to issue orders necessary to execute its functions. We note that petitions specifically requesting a stay, pursuant to sections 1.41 and 1.43 of the rules, as well as
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-70A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-70A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-70A1.txt
  • Reconsideration Order, 16 FCC Rcd. 9485, 9491, � 13. Reconsideration Order at n 73. Application for Review at 20. Application for Review at Footnote 35. Additionally, we note that Petitioners failed to file a Petition for Reconsideration with the Bureau on this point, and their attempt to marry two separate pleadings in one document here is inappropriate. 47 C.F.R. � 1.44 (Requests requiring action by the Commission shall not be combined in a pleading with requests for action by an administrative law judge or by any person or persons acting pursuant to delegated authority). Thus, because the Bureau was not afforded an to opportunity to address this point, consideration of this point here would not be appropriate. 47 C.F.R. � 1.115(c).
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-148A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-148A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-148A1.txt
  • a likelihood of prevailing on the merits, we find no error in the Bureau's holding. 9. In its Application for Review, ALM attempts again to make a showing in support of its request for stay. However, not only does ALM fail to show that it is likely to prevail on the merits, but its stay request is procedurally flawed. Section 1.44(e) of our rules provides that ``[a]ny request to stay the effectiveness of any decision or order of the Commission shall be filed as a separate pleading. Any such request which is not filed as a separate pleading will not be considered by the Commission.'' For these reasons, we need not consider ALM's stay request further. 10. Conclusion. For the foregoing
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-6A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-6A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-6A1.txt
  • Makaha 301 application is noticed as `Accepted for Filing.''' Application for Review at 1 n.1. This pleading is procedurally deficient Any petition to deny KMC's Form 301 application should have been filed in the first instance with the Bureau within ten days of public notice of acceptance of the KMC application. 47 C.F.R. � 73.5006(b). See also 47 C.F.R. � 1.44(a) (``Requests requiring action by the Commission shall not be combined in a pleading with requests for action by an administrative law judge or by any person or persons acting pursuant to delegated authority.''). ALM may not use an Application for Review of an action taken under delegated authority to serve as a petition to deny an application pending before the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-199A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-199A2.txt
  • RG-6 is clearly the preferred and recommended choice that consumers residing near the Grade B contours of TV stations would typically employ . . . ."41 RG-6 coax cable is commonly available. Based on current specifications for such readily available RG-6, attenuation for 50 feet is as follows42: Low VHF 0.75 dB to 0.93 dB High VHF 1.31 dB to 1.44 dB UHF 2.20 dB to 2.76 dB where the range provides the loss from the lowest to the highest channel in each band. Based on these current data, it is plain that transmission line loss occurring in 50 feet of recommended RG-6 coaxial cable is, for low VHF, less than 1 dB; for high VHF, less than 2 dB; and
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-33A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-33A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-33A1.txt
  • declined significantly over the years. At the time the original access charge regime was adopted, the average interstate traffic-sensitive switching rate was 3.1 cents per minute and the average total access charge was 17.26 cents per minute. Most recent figures show the average interstate traffic-sensitive rate to be 0.48 cents per minute and the average total access charge to be 1.44 cents per minute. Notwithstanding these reductions, access charges continue to represent a significant revenue source for these carriers and a significant cost component for IXCs. Many of the reform proposals include mechanisms by which some carriers will be permitted to offset revenues previously recovered through interstate access charges. Other proposals question the need to offset revenues and oppose proposals that
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-51A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-51A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-51A1.txt
  • not redress HITN's injury (i.e., loss of the opportunity to obtain the applied-for license) because there is now another, independent basis for dismissing HITN's application. Ball State Applications. In the AFR, HITN requests a stay of further processing of Ball State's Kokomo application. We decline to consider this stay request because it does not comply with the Commission's Rules. Section 1.44(e) of the Commission's Rules states: ``Any request to stay the effectiveness of any decision or order of the Commission shall be filed as a separate pleading. Any such request which is not filed as a separate pleading will not be considered by the Commission.'' Since HITN improperly combined its stay request with its application for review, we will not consider
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-179A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-179A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-179A1.txt
  • (1/1/04) $45.34 $45.34 $45.36 $44.92 $44.78 $45.30 $45.27 $47.19 $39.21 Pre-wired home $32.22 $32.23 $32.14 $30.46 $30.07 $31.58 $33.17 $33.37 $33.89 Standard error 0.67 0.57 1.64 1.90 1.20 3.87 1.02 1.93 3.78 Prior year (1/1/04) $31.61 $31.53 $32.38 $31.30 $31.40 $31.04 $33.93 $31.83 $32.00 Service reconnection $28.81 $28.80 $28.85 $24.73 $24.41 $25.60 $29.75 $35.53 $26 .85 Standard error 0.62 0.54 1.44 1.57 1.32 2.27 0.97 1.82 2.83 Prior year (1/1/04) $28.36 $28.27 $29.25 $24.98 $25.09 $24.67 $30.39 $36.10 $25.23 CableCARD, current subscriber $18.86 $18.87 $18.71 $18.12 $22.45 $5.98 $19.22 $20.63 $6.33 Standard error 0.84 0.74 1.85 1.66 1.63 1.77 1.27 3.14 2.58 CableCARD, ATTACHMENT 6 Average Operating Capacity January 1, 2005 Sample Groups Overall Non-Comp. Sample Communities With a Finding of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-20A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-20A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-20A1.txt
  • In a footnote, the MO&O states that Petitioners failed to file a Petition for Reconsideration with the Bureau on this point; that their request to have their Application for Review treated as a petition for reconsideration on the issue of claim preclusion is an attempt to marry two separate pleadings in one document that is inappropriate under 47 C.F.R. � 1.44; and that because the Bureau was not afforded an opportunity to address this point, it would not be appropriate under 47 C.F.R. � 1.115(c) for the Commission to consider it. The MO&O also concludes that because the Bureau's statement regarding claim preclusion amounted to dictum, it is unnecessary for the Commission to address it. Hill & Welch asserts that it
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-236A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-236A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-236A1.txt
  • point he filed his comments with the Commission. Ordering clause Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), 214, 309, and 310(d) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 154(i), 154(j), 214, 309, 310(d), section 2 of the Cable Landing License Act, 47 U.S.C. � 35, Executive Order No. 10530, and sections 1.4, 1.41, 1.44(e), and 1.106 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.4, 1.41, 1.44(e), 1.106, that the ``Petition for Reconsideration'' filed January 26, 2007 by Michael Lovern, Sr. IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Marlene H. Dortch Secretary AT&T Inc. and BellSouth Corporation Application for Transfer of Control, WC Docket No. 06-74, Memorandum Opinion and Order, 22 FCC Rcd 5662 (2007) (AT&T/BellSouth Merger
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-09-70A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-09-70A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-09-70A1.txt
  • and Section 1.429 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.429, the Petitions for Reconsideration filed by the Wireless Communications Association International, Inc. and Gateway Access Solutions, Inc. on June 9, 2008 ARE GRANTED IN PART and are otherwise DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to Section 4(i) of the Communications Act of 1934, 47 U.S.C. � 154(i), and Section 1.44(e) of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.44(e), that the Petition for Stay of Wireless Communications Association International, Inc. filed on June 9, 2008 IS DISMISSED AS MOOT. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN of the proposed regulatory changes described in this Third Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, and that comment is sought on these proposals. IT
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-09-70A1_Rcd.pdf
  • 405, and Section 1.429 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.429, the Petitions for Reconsideration filedby the Wireless Communications Association International, Inc. and Gateway Access Solutions, Inc. on June 9, 2008 ARE GRANTED IN PART and are otherwise DENIED. 44. ITIS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to Section 4(i) of the Communications Act of 1934, 47 U.S.C. � 154(i), and Section 1.44(e) of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.44(e), that the Petition for Stay of Wireless Communications Association International, Inc. filed on June 9, 2008 IS DISMISSED AS MOOT. 45. ITIS FURTHER ORDERED that NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN of the proposed regulatory changes described in this ThirdFurtherNotice of Proposed Rulemaking, and that comment is sought on these proposals. 111See5 U.S.C. �
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-101A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-101A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-101A1.txt
  • this same allegation. To the extent that Cherry raises new issues on review, the application for review is subject to dismissal for violation of Section 1.115(c). Finally, the application for review includes a request to stay the Staff Decision. The request for stay is deficient on two grounds. First, Cherry provides no showing in support of this request. Second, Section 1.44(e) of the Rules requires that a request to stay the effectiveness of an order must be filed as a separate pleading and directs the Commission not to consider such a request when not filed as a separate pleading. Thus, the request for stay will be dismissed. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that the application for review of Dr. Glenn Cherry and
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-175A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-175A1.txt
  • network performance.31 Such cost savings will help E- rate funds go further. 15. Furthermore, the increased capacity available through fiber will enable schools and libraries to develop and deliver a wide variety of educational programs and services to students and library patrons. For example, the bandwidth used by San Francisco's public libraries has increased over the past five years, from 1.44 megabits per second (Mbps) to 50 Mbps, but even 50 Mbps is currently insufficient for San Francisco to deliver the bandwidth-intensive content available on the Internet through its libraries' online resources and databases.32 San Francisco's public library branches serve as community anchors, both as centers for digital literacy and as hubs for access to public computers.33 While their bandwidth needs
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-43A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-43A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-43A1.txt
  • 405, and section 1.106 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.106, that Farmers' Petition for Reconsideration IS DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), 201, 203, 206, 207, 208, 209, and 405 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 154(i), 154(j), 201, 203, 206, 207, 208, 209, and 405, and sections 1.43, 1.44(e) and 1.106 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.43, 1.44(e), and 1.106, that Farmers' Petition for Stay IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Marlene H. Dortch Secretary Petition for Reconsideration, File No. EB-07-MD-001 (filed Dec. 18, 2009) (``Petition for Reconsideration''). Qwest Commc'ns Corp. v. Farmers and Merchants Mut. Tel. Co., Second Order on Reconsideration, 24 FCC Rcd 14801 (2009) (``Second
• http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Orders/1997/fc97115a.pdf http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Orders/1997/fc97115a.wp
  • (ii)TheallowablemaximumERPforintermediatevaluesofHAATisdeterminedusing linearinterpolationbasedontheunitsemployedinthetable.ForDTVstationslocatedin ZoneIthatoperateonchannels7-13withanHAATthatexceeds305meters,theallowable E-30 maximumERPexpressedindecibelsabove1kW(dBk)isdeterminedusingthefollowing formula,withHAATexpressedinmeters: ERPmax=97.35-33.24*log10(HAAT) (iii)ForDTVstationslocatedinZoneIIorIIIthatoperateonchannels7-13withan HAATthatexceeds610meters,theallowablemaximumERPexpressedindecibelsabove1 kW(dBk)isdeterminedusingthefollowingformula,withHAATexpressedinmeters: ERPmax=62.34-17.08*log10(HAAT) (6)ADTVstationthatoperatesonachannel14-59allotmentcreatedsubsequenttothe initialDTVTablewillbeallowedamaximumERPof1000kWiftheirantennaHAATisat orbelow365meters. (i)AthigherHAATlevels,suchDTVstationswillbeallowedtooperatewithlower maximumERPlevelsinaccordancewiththefollowingtableandformulas: MaximumAllowableERPandAntennaHeight forDTVStationsOnChannels14-59,AllZones AntennaHAAT (meters) ERP (kW) 610 316 580 350 550 400 520 460 490 540 460 630 425 750 395 900 365 1000 (ii)TheallowablemaximumERPforintermediatevaluesofHAATisdeterminedusing E-31 linearinterpolationbasedontheunitsemployedinthetable.ForDTVstationslocatedin ZoneI,IIorIIIthatoperateonchannels14-59withanHAATthatexceeds610meters,the allowablemaximumERPexpressedindecibelsabove1kW(dBk)isdeterminedusingthe followingformula,withHAATexpressedinmeters: ERPmax=72.57-17.08*log10(HAAT) (g)ForDTVstationsusingachannelallotmentdesignatedwitha"c"inparagraph(b)of thissection,thepilotcarrierfrequencyoftheDTVsignalmustbemaintained5.082138MHz abovethevisualcarrierfrequencyoftheanalogTVbroadcaststationoperatingonthelower adjacentchannel,locatedwithin88kilometersoftheDTVbroadcaststation.Thisfrequency differencemustbemaintainedwithinatoleranceof�3Hz. (h)(1)Thefieldstrengthorvoltageofemissionsonfrequenciesoutsidetheauthorized channelofoperationmustbeattenuatednolessthanthefollowingamountsbelowtheaverage transmittedpowerwithintheauthorizedchannel.Atthechanneledge,emissionsmustbe attenuatednolessthan46dB.Morethan6MHzfromthechanneledge,emissionsmustbe attenuatednolessthan71dB.Atanyfrequencybetween0and6MHzfromthechannel edge,emissionsmustbeattenuatednolessthanthevaluedeterminedbythefollowing formula: AttenuationindB=46+[( f)2/1.44]; where: f=frequencydifferenceinMHzfromtheedgeofthechannel. (h)(2)Thisattenuationisbasedonameasurementbandwidthof500kHz.Other measurementbandwidthsmaybeusedaslongasappropriatecorrectionfactorsareapplied. Emissionsincludesidebands,spuriousemissionsandradiofrequencyharmonics.Attenuation istobemeasuredattheoutputterminalsofthetransmitter(includinganyfiltersthatmaybe employed).Intheeventofinterferencecausedtoanyservice,greaterattenuationmaybe required. Notetoparagraph(h):Greaterattenuationmayberequiredforsituationswherethe DTVstationandanadjacentchannelanalogTVstationservethesameareaandthere areexpectedtobelocationswithinthatsharedareawheretheanalogTVstation's fieldstrengthislessthan12dBabovetheDTVstation'sfieldstrength. 5.AnewSection73.623isaddedtoreadasfollows: �73.623DTVapplicationsandchangestoDTVallotments. (a)General.Thissectioncontainsthetechnicalcriteriaforevaluatingapplications requestingDTVfacilitiesthatdonotconformtotheprovisionsofsection73.622and petitionsforrulemakingtoamendtheDTVTableofAllotments(section73.622(b)). PetitionstoamendtheDTVTable(otherthanthosealsoexpresslyrequestingamendmentof thissection)andapplicationsfornewDTVbroadcaststationsorforchangesinauthorized DTVstationsfiledpursuanttothissectionwillnotbeacceptedforfilingiftheyfailto complywiththerequirementsofthissection. (b)InconsideringpetitionstoamendtheDTVTableandapplicationsfiledpursuanttothis E-32 section,theCommissionwillusegeographiccoordinatesdefinedinsection73.622(d)as referencepointsindeterminingallotmentseparationsandevaluatinginterferencepotential. (c)MinimumtechnicalcriteriaformodificationofDTVallotmentsincludedintheinitial DTVTableofAllotmentsandforapplicationsfiledpursuanttothissection.Nopetitionto modifyachannelallotmentincludedintheinitialDTVTableorapplicationforauthorityto constructormodifyaDTVstation,filedpursuanttothissection,willbeacceptedunlessit showscompliancewiththerequirementsofthisparagraph. (1)Requestsfiledpursuanttothisparagraphmustdemonstratecompliancewiththe principalcommunitycoveragerequirementsofsection73.625(a). (2)Requestsfiledpursuanttothisparagraphmustdemonstratethatthereisnoincreasein theamountofinterferencecausedtoanyotherDTVbroadcaststation,DTVallotment,or analogTVbroadcaststation.Forevaluatingcompliancewiththisrequirement,interferenceis tobepredictedbasedontheproceduresetforthinAppendixBoftheSixthReportandOrder inMMDocket87-268,FCC97-115,adoptedApril3,1997,includingserviceareas determinedinaccordancewithsection73.622(e),considerationofwhetherF(50,10)undesired signalswillexceedthefollowingdesired-to-undesired(D/U)signalratios,assumeduseofa directionalreceivingantenna,anduseoftheterraindependentLongley-Ricepoint-to-point propagationmodel.GuidanceforevaluatinginterferenceusingtheLongley-Rice methodologyisprovidedinOETBulletinNo.69.CopiesoftheSixthReportandOrderand OETBulletinNo.69maybeinspectedduringnormalbusinesshoursatthe:Federal CommunicationsCommission,1919MSt.,N.W.,DocketsBranch(Room239),Washington, DC,20554.ThesedocumentsarealsoavailablethroughtheInternetontheFCCHomePage athttp://www.fcc.gov.Thethresholdlevelsatwhichinterferenceisconsideredtooccurare: D/URatio _____________________________________________ Co-channel DTV-into-analogTV +34 analogTV-into-DTV +2* DTV-into-DTV +15* FirstAdjacentChannel LowerDTV-into-analogTV -17 UpperDTV-into-analogTV -12
• http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Orders/1998/fc98024.pdf
  • average transmitted power; 2) more than 6 MHz from the channel edge, emissions must be attenuated no less than 71 dB below the average transmitted power; and 3) at any frequency between 0 and 6 MHz from the channel edge, emissions must be attenuated no less than the value determined by the following formula:59 Attenuation in dB = 46 + [()f)2/1.44]; where: )f = frequency difference in MHz from the edge of the channel. In addition, in those cases where it was necessary to use adjacent channels in the same area, we paired and co-located adjacent NTSC and DTV channels to the extent possible. 87. Cannell, Fox, Gannett, the Joint MSTV Petitioners, Lincoln, Tribune and others request that we re-evaluate the
• http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Notices/2001/fcc01329.pdf http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Notices/2001/fcc01329.txt
  • J & J Broadcasting Inc 1972 0 0 0 C WDAR FM Soft AC Florence, SC 204Darlington SC Root Communications Group LP 1965 Jul-97 425 5.1 0.7 C3 WJMX AM Nws/Tlk/Spt Florence, SC 204Florence SC Root Communications Group LP 1947 Jul-97 250 3.2 0.7 B WJMX FM CHR Florence, SC 204Cheraw SC Root Communications Group LP 1979 Jul-97 1650 7.4 1.44 C2 WPFM AM Gospel Florence, SC 204Darlington SC Root Communications Group LP 1955 Jul-97 150 0 0 B WSQN FM Oldies Florence, SC 204Scranton SC Root Communications Group LP 1991 Jul-97 525 3.7 1.12 A WDSC AM Gospel Florence, SC 204Dillon SC Root Communications Group LP 1946 Oct-97 25 0 0 B WEGX FM Country Florence, SC 204Dillon SC Root
• http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Public_Notices/2000/da002614.pdf
  • the Commission requests receipt of software orders by 6:00 p.m. ET on Tuesday, November 28, 2000. The minimum hardware and software specifications required for the FCC remote bidding system are listed below: � CPU: Intel � Pentium or above � RAM: 16 MB (more recommended if you have multiple applications open) � Hard Disk: 33 MB available disk space � 1.44 MB Floppy Drive or CD-ROM Drive (to install the Remote Bidding System) � Modem: v.32bis 28.8 kbps Hayes� compatible modem (56.6 kbps recommended) � Monitor: VGA or above � Mouse or other pointing device � Microsoft� Windows� 95� or 98� 12 47 C.F.R. �1.2109 (d). 13 See Qualcomm Incorporated Petition for Declaratory Ruling Giving Effect to the Mandate of the
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2002/FCC-02-105A1.html
  • Joint Statement at 3, 11; Starpower-Verizon Virginia Complaint, Exhibit D (First Starpower- Verizon Virginia Agreement) at 8, 1.61. 17 Starpower-Verizon Virginia Joint Statement at 3, 12; Starpower-Verizon Virginia Complaint, Exhibit D (First Starpower- Verizon Virginia Agreement) at 2, 1.7. 18 Starpower-Verizon Virginia Joint Statement at 3-4, 14; Starpower-Verizon Virginia Complaint, Exhibit D (First Starpower- Verizon Virginia Agreement ) at 6, 1.44. 19 47 U.S.C. 251(b)(5). 20 Implementation of the Local Competition Provisions in the Telecommunications Act of 1996, Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, 11 FCC Rcd 14171, 14249, 230 (1996) (``Local Competition Order NPRM'') (emphasis added) (subsequent history omitted). 21 Starpower-Verizon Virginia Joint Statement at 3, 13; Starpower-Verizon Virginia Complaint, Exhibit D (First Starpower- Verizon Virginia Agreement) at 17-18, 5.7.2, 5.7.3, 5.7.5.
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2002/FCC-02-112A1.html
  • Publ'g Co v. Walling, 327 U.S. 186, 217 (1946) (rejecting petitioners' argument that agency subpoena power would subject them to impermissible inconvenience, expense, and harrassment precisely because ``they may make appropriate defense surrounded by every safeguard of judicial restraint.'') (internal quotation omitted). 51 See NAL Response at 22-26. 52 See supra n.7. 53 See supra 3. 54 47 C.F.R. 1.43, 1.44. 55 Moreover, as we discuss above, see supra 17, even after the issuance of this Forfeiture Order, SBC may choose not to pay the forfeiture and to raise a challenge to our findings in a trial de novo should the Department of Justice prosecute any collection action we may refer. 56 47 U.S.C. 408. 57 47 U.S.C. 416(c). 58 See
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2002/FCC-02-32A1.html
  • not yet acted on our motion. 12 Peninsula observes that it filed a motion for stay of our February 2000 MO&O, which, it argues, we never directly addressed. It now ``renews'' its request that the Commission stay its May 2001 MO&O pending a final court determination of Peninsula's appeal. We dismiss Peninsula's request. Peninsula's request does not comply with section 1.44(e) of our rules, 47 C.F.R. 1.44(e), which requires that stay requests be filed as separate pleadings. Moreover, our May 2001 MO&O modified in significant respects the February 2000 MO&O, thereby rendering moot Peninsula's stay request of the February 2000 MO&O. In any event, we note that the mere pendency of such a motion does not give Peninsula the right to
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2010/FCC-10-43A1.html
  • and section 1.106 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. S: 1.106, that Farmers' Petition for Reconsideration IS DENIED. 19. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), 201, 203, 206, 207, 208, 209, and 405 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. S:S: 154(i), 154(j), 201, 203, 206, 207, 208, 209, and 405, and sections 1.43, 1.44(e) and 1.106 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. S:S: 1.43, 1.44(e), and 1.106, that Farmers' Petition for Stay IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Marlene H. Dortch Secretary Petition for Reconsideration, File No. EB-07-MD-001 (filed Dec. 18, 2009) ("Petition for Reconsideration"). Qwest Commc'ns Corp. v. Farmers and Merchants Mut. Tel. Co., Second Order on Reconsideration, 24 FCC Rcd 14801 (2009) ("Second
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/05/releases/cblkelec.pdf http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/05/releases/cblkelec.txt http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/05/releases/cblkelec.wp
  • THE FCC ELECTRONIC FILING/APPLICATION REVIEW SOFTWARE Those applicants who wish to file their FCC application electronically or view other FCC applications on-line will need the following hardware and software: Hardware Requirements: o CPU: Intel 80486 or above (Pentium recommended) o RAM: 16MB RAM (more recommended if you intend to open multiple applications) o Hard Disk: 18MB available disk space* o 1.44MB 3.5" Floppy Drive (to install the remote system) o Five blank MS-DOS� formatted 3.5" 1.44MB floppy disks o Modem: v.32bis 14.4kbps Hayes compatible modem o Monitor: VGA or above o Mouse or other pointing device * Additional disk space may be required if a large number of applications are stored in your local database. Software Requirements: o FCC Electronic Filing/Application
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/05/releases/cw960005.pdf http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/05/releases/cw960005.txt http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/05/releases/cw960005.wp
  • THE FCC ELECTRONIC FILING/APPLICATION REVIEW SOFTWARE Those applicants who wish to file their FCC application electronically or view other FCC applications on-line will need the following hardware and software: Hardware Requirements: o CPU: Intel 80486 or above (Pentium recommended) o RAM: 16MB RAM (more recommended if you intend to open multiple applications) o Hard Disk: 18MB available disk space* o 1.44MB 3.5" Floppy Drive (to install the remote system) o Five blank MS-DOS� formatted 3.5" 1.44MB floppy disks o Modem: v.32bis 14.4kbps Hayes compatible modem o Monitor: VGA or above o Mouse or other pointing device * Additional disk space may be required if a large number of applications are stored in your local database. Software Requirements: o FCC Electronic Filing/Application
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/05/releases/cw960010.pdf http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/05/releases/cw960010.txt http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/05/releases/cw960010.wp
  • THE FCC ELECTRONIC FILING/APPLICATION REVIEW SOFTWARE Those applicants who wish to file their FCC application electronically or view other FCC applications on-line will need the following hardware and software: Hardware Requirements: o CPU: Intel 80486 or above (Pentium recommended) o RAM: 16MB RAM (more recommended if you intend to open multiple applications) o Hard Disk: 18MB available disk space* o 1.44MB 3.5" Floppy Drive (to install the remote system) o Five blank MS-DOS� formatted 3.5" 1.44MB floppy disks o Modem: v.32bis 14.4kbps Hayes compatible modem o Monitor: VGA or above o Mouse or other pointing device * Additional disk space may be required if a large number of applications are stored in your local database. Software Requirements: o FCC Electronic Filing/Application
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/05/releases/cw960012.pdf http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/05/releases/cw960012.txt http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/05/releases/cw960012.wp
  • THE FCC ELECTRONIC FILING/APPLICATION REVIEW SOFTWARE Those applicants who wish to file their FCC application electronically or view other FCC applications on-line will need the following hardware and software: Hardware Requirements: o CPU: Intel 80486 or above (Pentium recommended) o RAM: 16MB RAM (more recommended if you intend to open multiple applications) o Hard Disk: 18MB available disk space* o 1.44MB 3.5" Floppy Drive (to install the remote system) o Five blank MS-DOS� formatted 3.5" 1.44MB floppy disks o Modem: v.32bis 14.4kbps Hayes compatible modem o Monitor: VGA or above o Mouse or other pointing device * Additional disk space may be required if a large number of applications are stored in your local database. Software Requirements: o FCC Electronic Filing/Application
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/05/releases/da012421.pdf http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/05/releases/da012421.txt
  • to Assign Two C Block Broadband PCS Licenses to NewComm Wireless Services, Inc. in BTA Markets B488 and B489, Supplement To Request To Stay and Request for Expedited Ruling, filed by Centennial Communications Corp., dated October 1, 1999 ("Stay Request"). However, the original request to stay, contained in one sentence of Centennial's Petition, fails to satisfy the requirements of Section 1.44(e) of the Commission's rules. 47 C.F.R. � 1.44(e) ("Any request to stay the effectiveness of any decision or order of the Commission shall be filed as a separate pleading. Any such request which is not filed as a separate pleading will not be considered by the Commission."). Further, the Stay Request filed in October of 1999 fails to satisfy the
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/07/releases/da960586.pdf http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/07/releases/da960586.txt http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/07/releases/da960586.wp
  • or the 900 service. Those applicants who wish to file their FCC application electronically or view other FCC applications on-line will need the following hardware and software: Hardware Requirements: o CPU: Intel 80386 or above (80486 or faster recommended) o RAM: 8MB RAM (more recommended if you intend to open multiple applications) o Hard Disk: 18MB available disk space o 1.44MB 3.5" Floppy Drive (to install the remote system) o Five blank MS-DOS� formatted 3.5" 1.44MB floppy disks o Modem: v.32bis 14.4kbps Hayes compatible modem o Monitor: VGA or above o Mouse or other pointing device Software Requirements: o FCC Electronic Filing/Application Review Software (will be available through the Internet and the FCC Bulletin Board System) o Microsoft Windows 3.1 or
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/07/releases/da960709.pdf
  • a 900 number telephone service at a cost of $2.30 per minute. Those applicants who wish to view other FCC applications on-line will need the following hardware and software: Hardware Requirements: o CPU: Intel 80486 or above (Pentium recommended) o RAM: 16MB RAM (more recommended if you intend to open multiple applications) o Hard Disk: 18MB available disk space o 1.44MB 3.5" Floppy Drive (to install the remote system) o Five blank MS-DOS� formatted 3.5" 1.44MB floppy disks o Modem: v.32bis 14.4kbps Hayes compatible modem o Monitor: VGA or above o Mouse or other pointing device Software Requirements: o FCC Electronic Filing/Application Review Software (available through the Internet and the FCC Bulletin Board System) o Microsoft Windows 3.1 or Microsoft Windows
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/10/releases/da961153.pdf http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/10/releases/da961153.txt http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/10/releases/da961153.wp
  • THE FCC ELECTRONIC FILING/APPLICATION REVIEW SOFTWARE Those applicants who wish to file their FCC application electronically or view other FCC applications on-line will need the following hardware and software: Hardware Requirements: o CPU: Intel 80486 or above (Pentium recommended) o RAM: 16MB RAM (more recommended if you intend to open multiple applications) o Hard Disk: 18MB available disk space* o 1.44MB 3.5" Floppy Drive (to install the remote system) o Five blank MS-DOS� formatted 3.5" 1.44MB floppy disks o Modem: v.32bis 14.4kbps Hayes compatible modem o Monitor: VGA or above o Mouse or other pointing device * Additional disk space may be required if a large number of applications are stored in your local database. Software Requirements: o FCC Electronic Filing/Application
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/10/releases/pn_96889.pdf http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/10/releases/pn_96889.txt http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/10/releases/pn_96889.wp
  • CPU: Intel 80486 or above o RAM: 8MB RAM (more recommended if you intend to open multiple applications) o Hard Disk: 11MB available disk space o Modem: v.32bis 14.4kbps Hayes compatible modem o Monitor: VGA or above o Mouse or other pointing device To create backup installation disks for the FCC Form 175 Application, you will need the following: o 1.44MB 3.5" Floppy Drive o Three blank MS-DOS� formatted 1.44MB floppy disks Software Requirements: o FCC Form 175 Application Software (available through the Internet and the FCC Bulletin Board System) o Microsoft Windows 3.1 or Microsoft Windows for Workgroups v3.11 in an enhanced mode Note: The FCC Form 175 Application has not been tested in a Macintosh, OS/2, or Windows95 environment.
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/11/releases/auc9611f.pdf http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/11/releases/auc9611f.txt http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/11/releases/auc9611f.wp
  • Hardware Requirements: CPU: Intel 80386 or above (80486 or faster recommended) RAM: 8MB RAM (more recommended if you have multiple applications open) Hard Disk: 12MB available disk space Modem: v.32bis 14.4kbps Hayes compatible modem Monitor: VGA or above Mouse or other pointing device To create backup installation disks for the FCC Mock Auction Bidding System, you will need the following: 1.44MB 3.5" Floppy Drive Three (3) blank MS-DOS formatted 1.44MB floppy disks Software Requirements: FCC Mock Auction Bidding System (available through the Internet and the FCC Bulletin Board System) Microsoft Windows 3.1 or Microsoft Windows for Workgroups v3.11 in an enhanced mode Note: The FCC Mock Auction Bidding System has not been tested in a Macintosh, OS/2, or Windows95 environment. Therefore,
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/11/releases/bip_def.pdf
  • the following hardware and software: Hardware Requirements: CPU: Intel 80486 or above RAM: 8MB RAM (more recommended if you intend to open multiple applications) Hard Disk: 11MB available disk space Modem: v.32bis 14.4kbps Hayes compatible Monitor: VGA or above Mouse or other pointing device To create backup installation disks for the FCC Form 175 Application, you will need the following: 1.44MB 3.5" floppy drive Three blank MS-DOS� formatted 1.44MB floppy disks Software Requirements: FCC Form 175 application software (available through the Internet and the FCC Bulletin Board System) Microsoft Windows 3.1 or Microsoft Windows for Workgroups v3.11 in an enhanced mode NOTE: The FCC Form 175 application has not been tested in a Macintosh, OS/2, or Windows95 environment. Therefore, the FCC
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/11/releases/d1961026.pdf
  • hardware and software: Hardware Requirements: CPU: Intel 80486 or above RAM: 8 MB RAM (more recommended if you intend to open multiple applications) Hard Disk: 11 MB available disk space Modem: v.32bis 14.4kbps Hayes compatible Monitor: VGA or above Mouse or other pointing device To create backup installation disks for the FCC Form 175 Application, you will need the following: 1.44 MB 3.5" floppy drive Three blank MS-DOS� formatted 1.44 MB floppy disks Software Requirements: FCC Form 175 application software (available through the Internet and the FCC Bulletin Board System) Microsoft Windows 3.1 or Microsoft Windows for Workgroups v3.11 in an enhanced mode NOTE: The FCC Form 175 application software has not been tested in a Macintosh, OS/2, or Windows95 environment.
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/11/releases/da970081.pdf http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/11/releases/da970081.txt http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/11/releases/da970081.wp
  • THE FCC ELECTRONIC FILING/APPLICATION REVIEW SOFTWARE Those applicants who wish to file their FCC application electronically or view other FCC applications on-line will need the following hardware and software: Hardware Requirements: o CPU: Intel 80486 or above (Pentium recommended) o RAM: 16MB RAM (more recommended if you intend to open multiple applications) o Hard Disk: 18MB available disk space* o 1.44MB 3.5" Floppy Drive (to install the remote system) o Five blank MS-DOS� formatted 3.5" 1.44MB floppy disks o Modem: v.32bis 14.4kbps Hayes compatible modem o Monitor: VGA or above o Mouse or other pointing device * Additional disk space may be required if a large number of applications are stored in your local database. Software Requirements: o FCC Electronic Filing/Application
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/12/releases/d96-1850.pdf http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/12/releases/d96-1850.txt http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/12/releases/d96-1850.wp
  • above (80486 or faster recommended) o RAM: 8MB RAM (more recommended if you intend to open multiple applications) o Hard Disk: 12MB available disk space o Modem: v.32bis 14.4kbps Hayes compatible modem o Monitor: VGA or above o Mouse or other pointing device To create backup installation disks for the FCC Form 175 Application, you will need the following: o 1.44MB 3.5" Floppy Drive o Three blank MS-DOS� formatted 1.44MB floppy disks Software Requirements: o FCC Form 175 Application Software (available through the Internet and the FCC Bulletin Board System) o Microsoft Windows 3.1 or Microsoft Windows for Workgroups v3.11 in an enhanced mode Note: The FCC Form 175 Application has not been tested in a Macintosh, OS/2, or Windows95 environment.
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/12/releases/da970011.pdf http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/12/releases/da970011.txt http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/12/releases/da970011.wp
  • following hardware and software: Hardware Requirements: CPU: Intel 80486 or above RAM: 8MB RAM (more recommended if you have multiple applications open) Hard Disk: 12MB available disk space Modem: v.32bis 14.4kbps Hayes compatible modem Monitor: VGA or above Mouse or other pointing device To create backup installation disks for the FCC Mock Auction Bidding System, you will need the following: 1.44MB 3.5" Floppy Drive Three (3) blank MS-DOS formatted 1.44MB floppy disks Software Requirements: FCC Mock Auction Bidding System (available through the Internet and the FCC Bulletin Board System) Microsoft Windows 3.1 or Microsoft Windows for Workgroups v3.11 in an enhanced mode Note: The FCC Mock Auction Bidding System has not been tested in a Macintosh, OS/2, or Windows95 environment. Therefore,
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/14/releases/da970386.pdf http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/14/releases/da970386.txt http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/14/releases/da970386.wp
  • CPU: Intel 80486 or above o RAM: 8MB RAM (more recommended if you intend to open multiple applications) o Hard Disk: 12MB available disk space o Modem: v.32bis 14.4kbps Hayes compatible modem o Monitor: VGA or above o Mouse or other pointing device To create backup installation disks for the FCC Form 175 Application, you will need the following: o 1.44MB 3.5" Floppy Drive o Three blank MS-DOS� formatted 1.44MB floppy disks B-2 Software Requirements: o FCC Form 175 Application Software (available through the Internet and the FCC Bulletin Board System) o Microsoft Windows 3.1 or Microsoft Windows for Workgroups v3.11 in an enhanced mode Note: The FCC Form 175 Application has not been tested in a Macintosh, OS/2, or Windows95
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/14/releases/da970700.pdf http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/14/releases/da970700.txt http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/14/releases/da970700.wp
  • o FCC Mock Auction Bidding System software (available through the Internet and the FCC Bulletin Board System) o Microsoft Windows 3.1 or Microsoft Windows for Workgroups v3.11 o Internet browser software that is compatible with Netscape� Navigator� 2.0 or Microsoft Explorer� 3.0 To create backup installation disks for the FCC Mock Auction Bidding System, you will need the following: o 1.44MB 3.5" Floppy Drive o Three blank MS-DOS� formatted 1.44MB floppy disks Note: The FCC Mock Auction Bidding System has not been tested in a Macintosh, OS/2, or Windows95 environment. Therefore, the FCC will not support operating systems other than Microsoft Windows 3.1 or Microsoft Windows for Workgroups v3.11. This includes any other emulated Windows environment. If your Windows is in
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/14/releases/da970886.pdf http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/14/releases/da970886.txt http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/14/releases/da970886.wp
  • THE FCC ELECTRONIC FILING/APPLICATION REVIEW SOFTWARE Those applicants who wish to file their FCC application electronically or view other FCC applications on-line will need the following hardware and software: Hardware Requirements: o CPU: Intel 80486 or above (Pentium recommended) o RAM: 16MB RAM (more recommended if you intend to open multiple applications) o Hard Disk: 18MB available disk space* o 1.44MB 3.5" Floppy Drive (to install the remote system) o Five blank MS-DOS� formatted 3.5" 1.44MB floppy disks o Modem: v.32bis 14.4kbps Hayes compatible modem o Monitor: VGA or above o Mouse or other pointing device * Additional disk space may be required if a large number of applications are stored in your local database. Software Requirements: The software for filing
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/14/releases/wcsbip.pdf
  • CPU: Intel 80486 or above o RAM: 8MB RAM (more recommended if you intend to open multiple applications) o Hard Disk: 12MB available disk space o Modem: v.32bis 14.4kbps Hayes compatible modem o Monitor: VGA or above o Mouse or other pointing device To create backup installation disks for the FCC Form 175 Application, you will need the following: o 1.44MB 3.5" Floppy Drive o Three blank MS-DOS� formatted 1.44MB floppy disks Software Requirements: o FCC Form 175 Application Software (available through the Internet and the FCC Bulletin Board System) o Microsoft Windows 3.1 or Microsoft Windows for Workgroups v3.11 in an enhanced mode Note: The FCC Form 175 Application has not been tested in a Macintosh, OS/2, or Windows95 environment.
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/16/releases/da971672.pdf http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/16/releases/da971672.txt http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/16/releases/da971672.wp
  • and software: Hardware Requirements: CPU: Intel 80486 or above RAM: 8 MB RAM (more recommended if you intend to open multiple applications) Hard Disk: 12 MB available disk space Modem: v.32bis 14.4kbps Hayes compatible modem Monitor: VGA or above Mouse or other pointing device To create backup installation disks for the FCC Form 175 Application, you will need the following: 1.44 MB 3.5" Floppy Drive Three blank MS-DOS� formatted 1.44-MB floppy disks Software Requirements: FCC Form 175 Application Software (available through the Internet and the FCC Bulletin Board System) Microsoft Windows 3.1 or Microsoft Windows for Workgroups v3.11 C-3 Note: The FCC Form 175 Application has not been tested in a Macintosh, OS/2, or Windows 95 environment. Therefore, the FCC will
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/16/releases/da972222.pdf http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/16/releases/da972222.txt http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/16/releases/da972222.wp
  • o FCC Mock Auction Bidding System software (available through the Internet and the FCC Bulletin Board System) o Microsoft Windows 3.1 or Microsoft Windows for Workgroups v3.11 o Internet browser software that is compatible with Netscape� Navigator� 2.0 or Microsoft Explorer� 3.0 To create backup installation disks for the FCC Mock Auction Bidding System, you will need the following: o 1.44MB 3.5" Floppy Drive o Three blank MS-DOS� formatted 1.44MB floppy disks Note: The FCC Mock Auction Bidding System has not been tested in a Macintosh, OS/2, or Windows95 environment. Therefore, the FCC will not support operating systems other than Microsoft Windows 3.1 or Microsoft Windows for Workgroups v3.11. This includes any other emulated Windows environment. If your Windows is in
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/17/releases/d980141.pdf
  • 95 Credit card number _____________________________________ Expiration date __________ Name on card _________________________________________________________________ Authorized signature ___________________________________________ Date ___________ Attachment E FCC Remote Bidding System: Hardware and Software Requirements You need at a minimum the following hardware and software: CPU: Intel� 80486 or above RAM: 8 MB (more recommended if you have multiple applications open) Hard Disk: 12 MB available disk space 1.44 MB Floppy Drive or CD-ROM Drive (to install the Remote Bidding System) Modem: v.32bis 14.4 kbps Hayes� compatible modem Monitor: VGA or above Mouse or other pointing device Microsoft� Windows� 3.1, Windows for Workgroups� 3.11, or Windows 95� Internet browser software that is compatible with Netscape� Navigator� 2.0 or Microsoft Explorer� 3.0 Note: The FCC Remote Bidding System has not
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/17/releases/d980141e.pdf http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/17/releases/d980141e.txt http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/17/releases/d980141e.wp
  • Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Attachment E FCC Remote Bidding System: Hardware and Software Requirements You need at a minimum the following hardware and software: CPU: Intel� 80486 or above RAM: 8 MB (more recommended if you have multiple applications open) Hard Disk: 12 MB available disk space 1.44 MB Floppy Drive or CD-ROM Drive (to install the Remote Bidding System) Modem: v.32bis 14.4 kbps Hayes� compatible modem Monitor: VGA or above Mouse or other pointing device Microsoft� Windows� 3.1, Windows for Workgroups� 3.11, or Windows 95� Internet browser software that is compatible with Netscape� Navigator� 2.0 or Microsoft Explorer� 3.0 Note: The FCC Remote Bidding System has not
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/17/releases/d980230.pdf
  • o FCC Mock Bidding System software (available through the Internet and the FCC Bulletin Board System) o Microsoft� Windows 95�, Microsoft� Windows� 3.1, or Microsoft� Windows for Workgroups� 3.11 o Internet browser software that is compatible with Netscape� Navigator� 2.0 and Microsoft� Explorer� 3.0. To create backup installation disks for the FCC Mock Bidding System, you need the following: o 1.44-MB 3.5" floppy drive o Three blank MS-DOS� formatted 1.44-MB floppy disks Note: The FCC Mock Bidding System has not been tested in a Macintosh, OS/2, or Windows NT� environment. Therefore, the FCC will not support operating systems other than Microsoft Windows 3.1, Microsoft Windows for Workgroups 3.11, or Microsoft Windows 95. This includes any other emulated Windows environment. If your
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/17/releases/d980230e.pdf http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/17/releases/d980230e.txt http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/17/releases/d980230e.wp
  • o FCC Mock Bidding System software (available through the Internet and the FCC Bulletin Board System) o Microsoft� Windows 95�, Microsoft� Windows� 3.1, or Microsoft� Windows for Workgroups� 3.11 o Internet browser software that is compatible with Netscape� Navigator� 2.0 and Microsoft� Explorer� 3.0. To create backup installation disks for the FCC Mock Bidding System, you need the following: o 1.44-MB 3.5" floppy drive o Three blank MS-DOS� formatted 1.44-MB floppy disks Note: The FCC Mock Bidding System has not been tested in a Macintosh, OS/2, or Windows NT� environment. Therefore, the FCC will not support operating systems other than Microsoft Windows 3.1, Microsoft Windows for Workgroups 3.11, or Microsoft Windows 95. This includes any other emulated Windows environment. If your
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/17/releases/da972081.pdf http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/17/releases/da972081.txt http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/17/releases/da972081.wp
  • 80486 or above o RAM: 8 MB RAM (more recommended if you intend to open multiple applications) o Hard Disk: 12 M available disk space o Modem: v.32bis 14.4kbps Hayes compatible modem o Monitor: VGA or above o Mouse or other pointing device To create backup installation disks for the FCC Form 175 Application, you will need the following: o 1.44 M 3.5" Floppy Drive o Three blank MS-DOS� formatted 1.44-M floppy disks Software Requirements: o FCC Form 175 Application Software (available through the Internet and the FCC Bulletin Board System) o Microsoft Windows 3.1 or Microsoft Windows for Workgroups v3.11 Note: The FCC Form 175 Application has not been tested in Macintosh, OS/2, or Windows 95 2 environments. Therefore, the
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/17/releases/lmdsbp_c.pdf
  • 80486 or above o RAM: 8 MB RAM (more recommended if you intend to open multiple applications) o Hard Disk: 12 MB available disk space o Modem: v.32bis 14.4kbps Hayes compatible modem o Monitor: VGA or above o Mouse or other pointing device To create backup installation disks for the FCC Form 175 Application, you will need the following: o 1.44 MB 3.5" Floppy Drive o Three blank MS-DOS� formatted 1.44-MB floppy disks 117 Software Requirements: o FCC Form 175 Application Software (available through the Internet and the FCC Bulletin Board System) o Microsoft Windows 3.1 or Microsoft Windows for Workgroups v3.11 Note: The FCC Form 175 Application has not been tested in a Macintosh, OS/2, or Windows 95 environment. Therefore,
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/18/releases/220_d.pdf
  • use the FCC Auctions PPP Dialer until you have restarted Windows. You will now have a new Program Manager group called FCC Auctions Dialer with icons labeled Configure PPP, PPP Dialer, and Uninstall. Creating Backup Installation Disks for the FCC Auctions PPP Dialer To create backup installation disks for the FCC Auctions PPP Dialer, you will need three blank formatted 1.44" disks. Copy setup.exe to the first disk, setup.001 to the second disk, and setup.002 to the third disk. Running the Configure PPP Program Before establishing a PPP connection, you must run the Configure PPP program. If desired, you may also adjust the configuration settings. To start the Configure PPP program: 1. Double-click the Configure PPP icon. The communications setup window
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/18/releases/da981010.pdf http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/18/releases/da981010.txt http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/18/releases/da981010.wp
  • use the FCC Auctions PPP Dialer until you have restarted Windows. You will now have a new Program Manager group called FCC Auctions Dialer with icons labeled Configure PPP, PPP Dialer, and Uninstall. Creating Backup Installation Disks for the FCC Auctions PPP Dialer To create backup installation disks for the FCC Auctions PPP Dialer, you will need three blank formatted 1.44" disks. Copy setup.exe to the first disk, setup.001 to the second disk, and setup.002 to the third disk. Running the Configure PPP Program Before establishing a PPP connection, you must run the Configure PPP program. If desired, you may also adjust the configuration settings. To start the Configure PPP program: 1. Double-click the Configure PPP icon. The communications setup window
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/18/releases/da981689.pdf http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/18/releases/da981689.txt http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/18/releases/da981689.wp
  • and download the three FCC Auctions PPP Dialer files in that menu. 13 Attachment F FCC Remote Bidding System Hardware and Software Requirements You need at a minimum the following hardware and software: C CPU: Intel� Pentium or above C RAM: 16 MB (more recommended if you have multiple applications open) C Hard Disk: 12 MB available disk space C 1.44 MB Floppy Drive or CD-ROM Drive (to install the Remote Bidding System) C Modem: v.32bis 14.4 kbps Hayes� compatible modem C Monitor: VGA or above C Mouse or other pointing device C Microsoft� Windows� 3.1, Windows for Workgroups� 3.11, or Windows 95� C Netscape� Communicator� 4.05
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/18/releases/da981787.pdf http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/18/releases/da981787.txt http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/18/releases/da981787.wp
  • this version supersedes the prior version. FCC Remote Bidding System Hardware and Software Requirements You need at a minimum the following hardware and software: C CPU: Intel� Pentium or above C RAM: 16 MB (more recommended if you have multiple applications open) C Hard Disk: Windows 3.1: 12 MB available disk space Windows 95: 33 MB available disk space C 1.44 MB Floppy Drive or CD-ROM Drive (to install the Remote Bidding System) C Modem: v.32bis 14.4 kbps Hayes� compatible modem C Monitor: VGA or above C Mouse or other pointing device C Microsoft� Windows� 3.1, Windows for Workgroups� 3.11, or Windows 95� C Netscape� Communicator� 4.05 13 Attachment E DOWNLOADING AND INSTALLING THE FCC MOCK BIDDING SYSTEM This attachment describes
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/20/releases/da982248.pdf http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/20/releases/da982248.txt http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/20/releases/da982248.wp
  • Expiration date __________ Name on card _________________________________________________________________ Authorized signature ___________________________________________ Date ___________ 1 Attachment D FCC Remote Bidding System Hardware and Software Requirements At a minimum, bidders need the following hardware and software: # #CPU: Intel� Pentium or above # #RAM: 16 MB (more recommended if you have multiple applications open) # #Hard Disk: 12 MB available disk space # #1.44 MB Floppy Drive or CD-ROM Drive (to install the Remote Bidding System) # #Modem: v.32bis 14.4 kbps Hayes� compatible modem # #Monitor: VGA or above # #Mouse or other pointing device # #Microsoft� Windows 95� or Microsoft� Windows 98� # #Netscape� Communicator� 4.05
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/20/releases/da982347.pdf http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/20/releases/da982347.txt http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/20/releases/da982347.wp
  • DataMarine International, Inc. 0201412357 Net Radio Group Communications Page 1 of 1 1 Attachment D FCC Remote Bidding System Hardware and Software Requirements At a minimum, bidders need the following hardware and software: # #CPU: Intel� Pentium or above # #RAM: 16 MB (more recommended if you have multiple applications open) # #Hard Disk: 33 MB available disk space # #1.44 MB Floppy Drive or CD-ROM Drive (to install the Remote Bidding System) # #Modem: v.32bis 14.4 kbps Hayes� compatible modem # #Monitor: VGA or above # #Mouse or other pointing device # #Microsoft� Windows 95� or Microsoft� Windows 98� # #Netscape� Communicator� 4.05 with JDK 1.1, or higher version of Netscape For questions regarding the above please contact Jeff Garretson
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/20/releases/e982248d.pdf http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/20/releases/e982248d.txt http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/20/releases/e982248d.wp
  • version of Netscape". These changes are reflected in the corrected Attachment D below: Attachment D FCC Remote Bidding System Hardware and Software Requirements At a minimum, bidders need the following hardware and software: # #CPU: Intel� Pentium or above # #RAM: 16 MB (more recommended if you have multiple applications open) # #Hard Disk: 33 MB available disk space # #1.44 MB Floppy Drive or CD-ROM Drive (to install the Remote Bidding System) # #Modem: v.32bis 14.4 kbps Hayes� compatible modem # #Monitor: VGA or above # #Mouse or other pointing device # #Microsoft� Windows 95� or Microsoft� Windows 98� # #Netscape� Communicator� 4.05 with JDK 1.1, or higher version of Netscape For questions regarding the above please contact Jeff Garretson
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/21/releases/da990249.pdf http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/21/releases/da990249.txt http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/21/releases/da990249.wp
  • _____________________________________ Expiration date __________ Name on card _________________________________________________________________ Authorized signature ___________________________________________ Date ___________ Attachment D FCC Remote Bidding System Hardware and Software Requirements At a minimum, bidders need the following hardware and software: # #CPU: Intel� Pentium or above # #RAM: 16 MB (more recommended if you have multiple applications open) # #Hard Disk: 33 MB available disk space # #1.44 MB Floppy Drive or CD-ROM Drive (to install the Remote Bidding System) # #Modem: v.32bis 14.4 kbps Hayes� compatible modem or faster # #Monitor: VGA or above # #Mouse or other pointing device # #Microsoft� Windows 95� or Microsoft� Windows 98� # #Netscape� Communicator� 4.5 is recommended. However, you can also use Netscape Communicator 4.08, 4.07, 4.06 or 4.05 with
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/21/releases/da990283.pdf
  • 2/11/99 FCC Account # Name Attachment C 0211337564 cellutech Page 1 of 1 Page 1 of 1 Attachment D FCC Remote Bidding System Hardware and Software Requirements At a minimum, bidders need the following hardware and software: �CPU: Intel Pentium or above �RAM: 16 MB (more recommended if you have multiple applications open) �Hard Disk: 33 MB available disk space �1.44 MB Floppy Drive or CD_ROM Drive (to install the Remote Bidding System) �Modem: v.32bis 14.4kbps Hayes compatible modem or faster �Monitor: VGA or above �Mouse or other pointing device �Microsoft Windows 95/98 �Netscape Communicator 4.5 is recommended. However, you can also use Netscape Communicator 4.08, 4.07, 4.06 or 4.05 with JDK 1.1. Note: To download Netscape Communicator 4.5 free of
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/22/releases/da990375.pdf http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/22/releases/da990375.txt http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/22/releases/da990375.wp
  • _____________________________________ Expiration date __________ Name on card _________________________________________________________________ Authorized signature ___________________________________________ Date ___________ Attachment E FCC Remote Bidding System Hardware and Software Requirements At a minimum, bidders need the following hardware and software: # #CPU: Intel� Pentium or above # #RAM: 16 MB (more recommended if you have multiple applications open) # #Hard Disk: 33 MB available disk space # #1.44 MB Floppy Drive or CD-ROM Drive (to install the Remote Bidding System) # #Modem: v.32bis 14.4 kbps Hayes� compatible modem or faster # #Monitor: VGA or above # #Mouse or other pointing device # #Microsoft� Windows 95� or Microsoft� Windows 98� # #Netscape� Communicator� 4.5 is recommended. However, you can also use Netscape Communicator 4.08, 4.07, 4.06 or 4.05 with
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/22/releases/da990482.pdf
  • Wireless One Technologies, Inc. 0221835384 cellutech Page 2 of 2 Page 2 of 2 Attachment D FCC Remote Bidding System Hardware and Software Requirements At a minimum, bidders need the following hardware and software: � CPU: Intel Pentium or above � RAM: 16 MB (more recommended if you have multiple applications open) � Hard Disk: 33 MB available disk space 1.44 MB Floppy Drive or CD_ROM Drive (to install the Remote Bidding System) � Modem: v.32bis 14.4kbps Hayes compatible modem or faster � Monitor: VGA or above � Mouse or other pointing device � Microsoft Windows 95/98 � Netscape Communicator 4.5 is recommended. However, you can also use Netscape Communicator 4.08, 4.07, 4.06 or 4.05 with JDK 1.1. Note: To download
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/23/charts/23press2.pdf
  • 18 $61,782,000.00 $42,504,850.00 41 1.19 2 8.40 32 13 13 $62,489,000.00 $43,727,700.00 41 1.17 2 5.41 33 9 9 $62,960,000.00 $43,719,000.00 40 1.16 2 5.04 34 7 7 $63,386,000.00 $44,065,500.00 40 1.15 2 4.08 35 13 12 $63,847,000.00 $44,296,100.00 40 1.08 3 5.04 36 6 6 $64,203,000.00 $44,491,900.00 40 1.06 3 2.72 37 3 3 $64,447,000.00 $44,626,100.00 40 1.04 3 1.44 38 4 4 $64,782,000.00 $44,810,350.00 40 1.04 3 1.66 39 1 1 $64,801,000.00 $44,820,800.00 40 1.04 3 0.38 40 2 2 $64,884,000.00 $44,866,450.00 40 1.03 3 1.02 41 3 3 $65,036,000.00 $44,950,050.00 40 1.03 3 1.16 42 3 3 $65,244,000.00 $45,064,450.00 40 1.03 3 1.16 43 0 0 $65,244,000.00 $45,064,450.00 40 1.03 3 0.00 Wednesday, May 12, 1999 Page 1
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/23/releases/da990639.doc http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/23/releases/da990639.pdf http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/23/releases/da990639.txt
  • required. Credit card number ___________________________________ Expiration date __________ Name on card _________________________________________________________________ Authorized signature ___________________________________________ Date ___________ Attachment D FCC Remote Bidding System Hardware and Software Requirements At a minimum, bidders need the following hardware and software: CPU: Intel(R) Pentium or above RAM: 16 MB (more recommended if you have multiple applications open) Hard Disk: 33 MB available disk space 1.44 MB Floppy Drive or CD-ROM Drive (to install the Remote Bidding System) Modem: v.32bis 14.4 kbps Hayes(c) compatible modem or faster Monitor: VGA or above Mouse or other pointing device "! cape download site at http://home.netscape.com/download/ For questions regarding the above, please contact Technical Support at (202) 414-1250. The 168 licenses to be auctioned include: 122 Block A (1,150 MHz)
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/23/releases/da990742.pdf
  • Inc. 0231644401 Western CLEC Corporation Page 1 of 1 Page 1 of 1 Attachment D FCC Remote Bidding System Hardware and Software Requirements At a minimum, bidders need the following hardware and software: � CPU: Intel� Pentium or above � RAM: 16 MB (more recommended if you have multiple applications open) � Hard Disk: 33 MB available disk space � 1.44 MB Floppy Drive or CD-ROM Drive (to install the Remote Bidding System) � Modem: v.32bis 14.4 kbps Hayes� compatible modem or faster � Monitor: VGA or above � Mouse or other pointing device � Microsoft� Windows 95� or Microsoft� Windows 98� � Netscape� Communicator� 4.5 is recommended. However, you can also use Netscape Communicator 4.08, 4.07, 4.06 or 4.05 with
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/24/releases/d990904c.doc http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/24/releases/d990904c.txt
  • required. Credit card number ___________________________________ Expiration date __________________ Name on card _______________________________________________________________________ Authorized signature ___________________________________________ Date _________________ Attachment D FCC Remote Bidding System Hardware and Software Requirements At a minimum, bidders need the following hardware and software: CPU: Intel(R) Pentium or above RAM: 16 MB (more recommended if you have multiple applications open) Hard Disk: 33 MB available disk space 1.44 MB Floppy Drive or CD-ROM Drive (to install the Remote Bidding System) Modem: v.32bis 14.4 kbps Hayes(c) compatible modem or faster Monitor: VGA or above Mouse or other pointing device "! te at http://home.netscape.com/download/ For questions regarding the above, please contact Technical Support at (202) 414-1250. @& @& ���0 l l �
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/25/releases/da991800.pdf
  • Grande City, Texas SST77Ardmore, Oklahoma SST78Iowa Falls, Iowa SST79Deming, New Mexico SST80Augusta, Georgia Attachment E FCC Remote Bidding System Hardware and Software Requirements At a minimum, bidders need the following hardware and software: � CPU: Intel� Pentium or above � RAM: 16 MB (more recommended if you have multiple applications open) � Hard Disk: 33 MB available disk space � 1.44 MB Floppy Drive or CD-ROM Drive (to install the Remote Bidding System) � Modem: v.32bis 14.4 Kbps Hayes� compatible modem or faster (recommend 56.6 Kbps) � Monitor: VGA or above � Mouse or other pointing device � Microsoft� Windows 95� or Microsoft� Windows 98� � Netscape� Communicator� 4.61 is recommended. However, you can also use Netscape Communicator 4.5 or 4.51
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/28/releases/da000405.doc http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/28/releases/da000405.pdf http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/28/releases/da000405.txt
  • before the auction begins, the Commission requests receipt of software orders by 5:30 p.m. ET on Tuesday, March 7, 2000. The minimum hardware and software specifications required for the FCC remote bidding system are listed below: CPU: Intel (R) Pentium or above RAM: 16 MB (more recommended if you have multiple applications open) Hard Disk: 33 MB available disk space 1.44 MB Floppy Drive or CD-ROM Drive (to install the Remote Bidding System) Modem: v.32bis 14.4 kbps Hayes(c) compatible modem (56.6 kbps recommended) Monitor: VGA or above Mouse or other pointing device "! lated Windows environment. Bidder Alerts: All applicants must certify on their FCC short-form (Form 175) applications under penalty of perjury that they are legally, technically, financially and otherwise
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/33/releases/da001800.doc http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/33/releases/da001800.pdf http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/33/releases/da001800.txt
  • before the auction begins, the Commission requests receipt of software orders by 6:00 p.m. ET on Monday, August 21, 2000. The minimum hardware and software specifications required for the FCC remote bidding system are listed below: CPU: Intel (R) Pentium or above RAM: 16 MB (more recommended if you have multiple applications open) Hard Disk: 33 MB available disk space 1.44 MB Floppy Drive or CD-ROM Drive (to install the Remote Bidding System) Modem: v.32bis 28.8 kbps Hayes(c) compatible modem (56.6 kbps recommended) Monitor: VGA or above "! includes any other emulated Windows environment. Long-Form Applications: All applicants should be aware that at the long-form application stage, they will be subject to the more extensive reporting requirements contained in the Commission's
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/34/releases/da001639.doc http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/34/releases/da001639.pdf http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/34/releases/da001639.txt
  • before the auction begins, the Commission requests receipt of software orders by 5:30 p.m. ET on Tuesday, August 1, 2000. The minimum hardware and software specifications required for the FCC remote bidding system are listed below: CPU: Intel (R) Pentium or above RAM: 16 MB (more recommended if you have multiple applications open) Hard Disk: 33 MB available disk space 1.44 MB Floppy Drive or CD-ROM Drive (to install the Remote Bidding System) Modem: v.32bis 28.8 kbps Hayes(c) compatible modem (56.6 kbps recommended) Monitor: VGA or above Mouse or other pointing device "! environment. Long-Form Applications: All applicants should be aware that at the long-form application stage, they will be subject to the more extensive reporting requirements contained in the Commission's
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/35/releases/da002614.doc http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/35/releases/da002614.pdf http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/35/releases/da002614.txt
  • before the auction begins, the Commission requests receipt of software orders by 6:00 p.m. ET on Tuesday, November 28, 2000. The minimum hardware and software specifications required for the FCC remote bidding system are listed below: CPU: Intel (R) Pentium or above RAM: 16 MB (more recommended if you have multiple applications open) Hard Disk: 33 MB available disk space 1.44 MB Floppy Drive or CD-ROM Drive (to install the Remote Bidding System) Modem: v.32bis 28.8 kbps Hayes(c) compatible modem (56.6 kbps recommended) Monitor: VGA or above Mouse or other pointing device "! ny other emulated Windows environment. Long-Form Applications: All applicants should be aware that at the long-form application stage, they will be subject to the more extensive reporting requirements
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/36/releases/da002260.doc http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/36/releases/da002260.pdf http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/36/releases/da002260.txt
  • before the auction begins, the Commission requests receipt of software orders by 6:00 p.m. ET on Tuesday, October 17, 2000. The minimum hardware and software specifications required for the FCC remote bidding system are listed below: CPU: Intel (R) Pentium or above RAM: 16 MB (more recommended if you have multiple applications open) Hard Disk: 33 MB available disk space 1.44 MB Floppy Drive or CD-ROM Drive (to install the Remote Bidding System) Modem: v.32bis 28.8 kbps Hayes(c) compatible modem (56.6 kbps recommended) Monitor: VGA or above Mouse or other pointing device "! Windows environment. Long-Form Applications: All applicants should be aware that at the long-form application stage, they will be subject to the more extensive reporting requirements contained in the
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/38/releases/da010138.doc http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/38/releases/da010138.pdf http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/38/releases/da010138.txt
  • connection time to the 900 number service is at no charge, however, $2.30 will be charged for each additional minute. The minimum hardware and software specifications required for the FCC remote bidding system are listed below: CPU: Intel (R) Pentium or above RAM: 16 MB (more recommended if you have multiple applications open) Hard Disk: 33 MB available disk space 1.44 MB Floppy Drive or CD-ROM Drive (to install the Remote Bidding System) Modem: v.32bis 28.8 kbps Hayes(c) compatible modem (56.6 kbps recommended) Monitor: VGA or above Mouse or other pointing device "! ny other emulated Windows environment. Long-Form Applications: All applicants should be aware that at the long-form application stage, they will be subject to the more extensive reporting requirements
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/39/releases/da011177.doc http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/39/releases/da011177.pdf http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/39/releases/da011177.txt
  • connection time to the 900 number service is at no charge, however, $2.30 will be charged for each additional minute. The minimum hardware and software specifications required for the FCC remote bidding system are listed below: CPU: Intel (R) Pentium or above RAM: 16 MB (more recommended if you have multiple applications open) Hard Disk: 33 MB available disk space 1.44 MB Floppy Drive or CD-ROM Drive (to install the Remote Bidding System) Modem: v.32bis 28.8 kbps Hayes(c) compatible modem (56.6 kbps recommended) Monitor: VGA or above "! mission's Part 1 ownership disclosure rule. Bidder Alerts: All applicants must certify on their FCC Form 175 applications under penalty of perjury that they are legally, technically, financially and otherwise qualified to hold
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2002/fcc02331.pdf
  • 0.94 2.71 2.30 3.57 1.42 1,5 A.2.1.6.1.1ISDN/<10 circuits/Dispatch/FL (days)22.03 11.80 17.78 8.33 21.29 10.00 5.68 11.51 12.00 1,2,3,5 B - 7 Metric Metric Name [SQM Number] May June July August September Number and Disaggregation BST CLEC BST CLEC BST CLEC BST CLEC BST CLEC Notes Federal Communications Commission FCC 02-331 Florida Performance Metric Data A.2.1.6.1.2ISDN/<10 circuits/Non-Dispatch/FL (days) 2.20 1.20 2.52 1.44 3.23 5.78 2.86 2.61 2.10 2,3,5 A.2.1.6.2.1ISDN/>=10 circuits/Dispatch/FL (days) 11.50 13.33 23.75 27.02 36.00 26.43 8.67 4,5 A.2.1.6.2.2ISDN/>=10 circuits/Non-Dispatch/FL (days) 3.20 9.55 4.61 13.00 23.91 10.58 3.00 3,5 % Jeopardies - Mechanized A.2.4.1 Residence/FL (%) 0.53% 0.24% 0.53% 0.29% 0.53% 0.22% 0.60% 0.31% 0.47% 0.27% A.2.4.2 Business/FL (%) 1.52% 0.68% 1.52% 0.38% 1.31% 0.83% 1.53% 1.32% 1.47% 1.39% A.2.4.3 Design
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ldrpt103.pdf
  • $1.01 $0.15 1953 0.21 1.38 1993 0.19 0.24 1.02 0.15 1954 0.22 1.47 1994 0.18 0.21 0.93 0.14 1955 0.23 1.52 1995 0.17 0.20 0.91 0.12 1956 0.23 1.52 1996 0.16 0.18 0.76 0.12 1957 0.24 1.50 1997 0.15 0.16 0.69 0.11 1958 0.24 1.46 1998 0.14 0.16 0.58 0.11 1959 0.24 1.47 1999 0.14 0.15 0.54 0.11 1960 0.24 1.44 2000 0.12 0.12 0.52 0.09 1961 0.25 1.47 2001 0.10 0.10 0.35 0.08 1962 0.25 1.48 1963 0.25 1.44 1964 0.25 1.42 1965 0.24 1.35 1966 0.24 1.33 1967 0.24 1.29 1968 0.24 1.20 1969 0.24 1.16 Sources: Estimates for 1930 through 1981 are based on information in AT&T's Long Lines Statistics, 1930-1963, 1946-1970, and 1960-1981, and appear to represent
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref02.pdf
  • 4.28 4.10 1986 1.75 1.67 1.61 2.26 2.12 2.11 2.57 2.47 2.46 2.95 2.85 2.84 3.14 3.04 3.03 3.33 3.25 3.24 3.44 3.35 3.34 3.54 3.46 3.45 3.79 3.68 3.67 1987 1.48 1.45 1.46 1.89 1.85 1.86 2.09 2.04 2.06 2.38 2.32 2.34 2.56 2.51 2.52 2.75 2.70 2.70 2.95 2.90 2.92 2.96 2.91 2.93 3.08 3.04 3.04 1988 1.47 1.44 1.44 1.78 1.75 1.76 1.98 1.94 1.94 2.16 2.12 2.13 2.34 2.40 2.40 2.43 2.50 2.50 2.64 2.69 2.71 2.64 2.71 2.73 2.75 2.84 2.84 1989 1.71 1.70 1.70 2.01 2.00 2.00 2.21 2.15 2.20 2.21 2.15 2.20 2.30 2.15 2.25 2.31 2.15 2.30 2.40 2.35 2.35 2.50 2.45 2.45 2.50 2.45 2.45 1990 1.71 1.70 1.71 1.97 1.90 1.90
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref03.pdf
  • 3.96 3.80 4.43 4.28 4.10 19861.75 1.67 1.61 2.26 2.12 2.11 2.57 2.47 2.46 2.95 2.85 2.84 3.14 3.04 3.03 3.33 3.25 3.24 3.44 3.35 3.34 3.54 3.46 3.45 3.79 3.68 3.67 19871.48 1.45 1.46 1.89 1.85 1.86 2.09 2.04 2.06 2.38 2.32 2.34 2.56 2.51 2.52 2.75 2.70 2.70 2.95 2.90 2.92 2.96 2.91 2.93 3.08 3.04 3.04 19881.47 1.44 1.44 1.78 1.75 1.76 1.98 1.94 1.94 2.16 2.12 2.13 2.34 2.40 2.40 2.43 2.50 2.50 2.64 2.69 2.71 2.64 2.71 2.73 2.75 2.84 2.84 19891.71 1.70 1.70 2.01 2.00 2.00 2.21 2.15 2.20 2.21 2.15 2.20 2.30 2.15 2.25 2.31 2.15 2.30 2.40 2.35 2.35 2.50 2.45 2.45 2.50 2.45 2.45 19901.71 1.70 1.71 1.97 1.90 1.90 1.97 1.90
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref04.pdf
  • 1,305 2001 558 727 906 1,054 1,343 2002 584 741 928 1,150 1,433 1980 2.61% 2.32% 2.18% 1.81% 1.51% 1981 2.96 2.52 2.24 1.95 1.55 1982 3.18 2.66 2.19 1.97 1.52 1983 3.13 2.82 2.24 2.02 1.55 1984 2.71 2.44 2.21 1.82 1.51 1985 2.72 2.41 2.20 1.81 1.39 1986 2.94 2.62 2.15 1.83 1.43 1987 3.24 2.57 2.31 1.85 1.44 1988 3.23 2.61 2.31 1.82 1.49 1989 3.05 2.61 2.30 1.88 1.43 1990 3.11 2.77 2.37 1.89 1.48 1991 3.08 2.80 2.28 1.84 1.45 1992 3.35 2.77 2.34 1.88 1.46 1993 3.27 2.70 2.45 1.96 1.53 1994 3.17 2.83 2.36 1.95 1.58 1995 3.38 2.71 2.41 1.99 1.55 1996 3.20 2.94 2.46 2.05 1.57 1997 3.24 3.02 2.53 2.09 1.63
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref05.pdf
  • 1,343 2002 584 741 928 1,150 1,433 2003 564 768 932 1,142 1,441 1980 2.61% 2.32% 2.18% 1.81% 1.51% 1981 2.96 2.52 2.24 1.95 1.55 1982 3.18 2.66 2.19 1.97 1.52 1983 3.13 2.82 2.24 2.02 1.55 1984 2.71 2.44 2.21 1.82 1.51 1985 2.72 2.41 2.20 1.81 1.39 1986 2.94 2.62 2.15 1.83 1.43 1987 3.24 2.57 2.31 1.85 1.44 1988 3.23 2.61 2.31 1.82 1.49 1989 3.05 2.61 2.30 1.88 1.43 1990 3.11 2.77 2.37 1.89 1.48 1991 3.08 2.80 2.28 1.84 1.45 1992 3.35 2.77 2.34 1.88 1.46 1993 3.27 2.70 2.45 1.96 1.53 1994 3.17 2.83 2.36 1.95 1.58 1995 3.38 2.71 2.41 1.99 1.55 1996 3.20 2.94 2.46 2.05 1.57 1997 3.24 3.02 2.53 2.09 1.63
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref98.pdf
  • 3.442.061.51 3.54 2.12 1.55 3.80 2.28 1.67 July 11, 1986 1.751.050.77 2.261.350.99 2.571.541.13 2.951.771.29 3.141.88 1.38 3.331.99 1.46 3.442.061.51 3.54 2.12 1.55 3.79 2.27 1.66 January 1, 1987 1.580.970.74 1.991.230.93 2.201.361.03 2.491.541.17 2.671.65 1.25 2.861.77 1.34 3.061.891.43 3.16 1.95 1.48 3.28 2.03 1.54 July 1, 1987 1.480.910.69 1.891.170.88 2.091.290.98 2.381.471.11 2.561.58 1.20 2.751.70 1.29 2.951.821.38 2.96 1.83 1.39 3.08 1.90 1.44 January 1, 1988 1.470.950.73 1.791.160.89 1.991.290.99 2.181.411.09 2.451.59 1.22 2.551.65 1.27 2.741.781.37 2.76 1.79 1.38 2.88 1.87 1.44 December 1, 1988 1.470.980.70 1.781.190.85 1.981.320.95 2.161.441.03 2.341.56 1.12 2.431.62 1.16 2.641.761.26 2.64 1.76 1.26 2.75 1.84 1.32 April 1, 1989 1.711.140.88 2.011.341.04 2.211.481.14 2.301.541.19 2.311.54 1.20 2.311.54 1.20 2.411.611.25 2.51 1.68 1.30 2.51 1.68 1.30 July 1, 1989 1.711.140.88 2.011.341.04 2.211.481.14
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref99.pdf
  • 3.442.061.51 3.54 2.12 1.55 3.80 2.28 1.67 July 11, 1986 1.751.050.77 2.261.350.99 2.571.541.13 2.951.771.29 3.141.88 1.38 3.331.99 1.46 3.442.061.51 3.54 2.12 1.55 3.79 2.27 1.66 January 1, 1987 1.580.970.74 1.991.230.93 2.201.361.03 2.491.541.17 2.671.65 1.25 2.861.77 1.34 3.061.891.43 3.16 1.95 1.48 3.28 2.03 1.54 July 1, 1987 1.480.910.69 1.891.170.88 2.091.290.98 2.381.471.11 2.561.58 1.20 2.751.70 1.29 2.951.821.38 2.96 1.83 1.39 3.08 1.90 1.44 January 1, 1988 1.470.950.73 1.791.160.89 1.991.290.99 2.181.411.09 2.451.59 1.22 2.551.65 1.27 2.741.781.37 2.76 1.79 1.38 2.88 1.87 1.44 December 1, 1988 1.470.980.70 1.781.190.85 1.981.320.95 2.161.441.03 2.341.56 1.12 2.431.62 1.16 2.641.761.26 2.64 1.76 1.26 2.75 1.84 1.32 April 1, 1989 1.711.140.88 2.011.341.04 2.211.481.14 2.301.541.19 2.311.54 1.20 2.311.54 1.20 2.411.611.25 2.51 1.68 1.30 2.51 1.68 1.30 July 1, 1989 1.711.140.88 2.011.341.04 2.211.481.14
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ror03.pdf
  • 27.64 22Chillicothe Telephone Company, The 18.35 12.95 44.27 2.72 25.26 15.91 23Coastal Untilities, Inc. 17.55 11.25 33.17 15.22 0.00 6.13 13.90 24Concord Telephone Co. 18.59 11.25 35.98 30.11 0.00 28.86 24.17 25El Paso Telephone Co. 25.68 12.35 66.48 30.22 22.70 28.04 26Farmers Telephone Cooperative, Inc. 11.95 11.25 22.41 17.95 0.00 3.67 9.07 27Fort Bend Telephone Co. dba TXU Communications 14.42 1.44 123.36 19.00 0.00 25.28 19.19 28Fort Mill Telephone Company 18.55 12.58 44.24 40.47 0.00 28.35 36.26 29Gallatin River Communications, LLC 14.50 11.25 25.67 4.59 0.00 16.64 8.58 30Gulf Telephone Company 17.37 11.25 31.84 14.04 0.00 21.90 19.64 31Hargray Telephone Company 6.94 11.25 (2.91) 9.39 0.00 13.22 11.45 32Home Telephone Company, Inc. 10.81 11.25 7.11 14.07 0.00 7.96 12.99 33Horry Telephone
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ror96.pdf
  • OF RETURN SUMMARY JANUARY 1, 1987 - DECEMBER 31, 1988 SUMMARY OF REPORTS FILED SEPTEMBER 30, 1989 FINAL REPORT MAXIMUM RATE OF RETURN 26.03 25.63 133.44 40.22 1,706.94 227.78 36.50 MINIMUM RATE OF RETURN 4.60 4.95 (16.59) 4.31 (954.51) (11.90) 0.42 ARITHMETIC MEAN RATE OF RETURN 12.86 12.14 12.64 13.80 (3.73) 19.47 14.58 STANDARD DEVIATION OF RATE OF RETURN 2.22 1.44 16.72 5.10 281.96 23.85 4.88 WEIGHTED ARITHMETIC MEAN 12.34 12.07 11.18 13.17 24.65 13.18 13.23 STANDARD DEVIATION 0.85 0.16 2.69 1.84 59.30 3.31 1.84 RATE OF RETURN DATA JANUARY 1, 1989 - DECEMBER 31, 1989 REPORTS FILED APRIL 2, 1990 SWITCHED TRAFFIC SENSITIVE COMMONSPECIAL END LOCAL NO. NAME OF COMPANY INTERSTATE LINE ACCESS OFFICE INFORMATIONTRANSPORT TOTAL AMERICAN TELEPHONE & TELEGRAPH
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/strev-95.pdf
  • 1.01 DELAWARE 100.00 1.00 DC 100.00 1.00 FLORIDA 98.47 1.02 GEORGIA 84.96 1.18 HAWAII 100.00 1.00 IDAHO 92.55 1.08 ILLINOIS 97.43 1.03 INDIANA 95.62 1.05 IOWA 83.83 1.19 KANSAS 84.00 1.19 KENTUCKY 76.44 1.31 LOUISIANA 92.83 1.08 MAINE 83.80 1.19 MARYLAND 99.81 1.00 MASSACHUSETTS 99.91 1.00 MICHIGAN 96.70 1.03 MINNESOTA 75.47 1.33 MISSISSIPPI 93.75 1.07 MISSOURI 93.36 1.07 MONTANA 69.54 1.44 NEBRASKA 87.24 1.15 NEVADA 31.46 3.18 NEW HAMPSHIRE 93.98 1.06 NEW JERSEY 99.85 1.00 NEW MEXICO 90.92 1.10 NEW YORK 96.82 1.03 NORTH CAROLINA 83.60 1.20 NORTH DAKOTA 70.80 1.41 OHIO 86.60 1.15 OKLAHOMA 88.72 1.13 OREGON 91.84 1.09 PENNSYLVANIA 94.80 1.05 RHODE ISLAND 100.00 1.00 SOUTH CAROLINA 74.74 1.34 SOUTH DAKOTA 77.77 1.29 TENNESSEE 87.77 1.14 TEXAS 93.88 1.07
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/strev-96.pdf
  • (4,089) (0.12) MISSISSIPPI 17,702 1.16 6,477 0.42 11,225 0.74 MISSOURI 29,429 0.77 15,944 0.42 13,485 0.35 MONTANA 23,380 3.99 2,506 0.43 20,873 3.56 NEBRASKA 6,688 0.58 4,828 0.42 1,860 0.16 NEVADA 3,208 0.24 5,589 0.41 (2,381) (0.18) NEW HAMPSHIRE 2,494 0.27 3,917 0.42 (1,423) (0.15) NEW JERSEY 2,048 0.03 30,058 0.42 (28,010) (0.40) NEW MEXICO 19,107 1.85 4,236 0.41 14,870 1.44 NEW YORK 9,633 0.07 60,164 0.41 (50,532) (0.34) NORTH CAROLINA 21,475 0.40 21,681 0.41 (206) (0.00) NORTH DAKOTA 6,458 1.37 1,843 0.39 4,615 0.98 OHIO 4,625 0.06 32,405 0.42 (27,781) (0.36) OKLAHOMA 26,637 1.19 9,485 0.42 17,152 0.76 OREGON 18,151 0.79 9,612 0.42 8,538 0.37 PENNSYLVANIA 1,426 0.02 37,047 0.40 (35,621) (0.39) RHODE ISLAND 0 0.00 3,134 0.42 (3,134) (0.42)
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/strev-97.pdf
  • Interstate Intrastate Interstate + Intrastate Percent Percent USF* (Millions) (Millions) (Millions) of Total InterstateIntrastate ALABAMA $958 $1,689 $2,647 1.41 98.48 99.72 ALASKA 184 268 452 0.24 98.47 99.72 ARIZONA 1,401 1,547 2,948 1.57 98.46 99.72 ARKANSAS 579 958 1,538 0.82 98.47 99.74 CALIFORNIA 6,720 15,629 22,349 11.92 98.48 99.69 COLORADO 1,410 1,812 3,222 1.72 98.46 99.74 CONNECTICUT 1,159 1,546 2,705 1.44 98.45 99.78 DELAWARE 273 253 527 0.28 98.45 99.75 DIST. OF COLUMBIA 380 451 831 0.44 98.46 99.76 FLORIDA 4,645 6,685 11,330 6.04 98.47 99.69 GEORGIA 2,259 3,339 5,598 2.99 98.47 99.72 HAWAII 286 460 746 0.40 98.48 99.76 IDAHO 356 392 748 0.40 98.46 99.75 ILLINOIS 3,038 5,409 8,446 4.51 98.47 99.70 INDIANA 1,293 2,341 3,634 1.94 98.48 99.71
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/strev-99.pdf
  • 0.64 Tennessee 11,913 0 11,913 0.29 16,726 0.40 -4,813 -0.12 Texas 68,396 1,436 69,832 0.44 54,564 0.35 15,268 0.10 Utah 3,908 0 3,908 0.28 6,685 0.47 -2,777 -0.20 Vermont 3,397 0 3,397 0.68 2,447 0.49 950 0.19 Virginia 2,911 1,458 4,369 0.08 25,982 0.45 -21,613 -0.38 Washington 23,499 0 23,499 0.52 19,436 0.43 4,063 0.09 West Virginia 17,540 0 17,540 1.44 4,898 0.40 12,642 1.04 Wisconsin 17,633 0 17,633 0.42 14,178 0.34 3,455 0.08 Wyoming 12,367 1,362 13,730 3.85 2,031 0.57 11,699 3.28 United States 761,690 38,098 799,788 0.36 866,590 0.39 -66,802 -0.03 Guam 1,319 0 1,319 1.42 262 0.28 1,057 1.14 N. Mariana Islands 2,457 0 2,457 8.21 97 0.33 2,359 7.88 Puerto Rico 0 51,970 51,970 3.35 5,027 0.32
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend100.pdf
  • Day 2.27 $1.30 -42.7 2.27 2.02 -11.0 Evening 1.36 0.80 -41.2 1.36 2.02 48.5 Night & Weekend 0.90 0.65 -27.8 0.90 2.02 124.4 431 - 925 Day 2.34 $1.30 -44.4 2.34 2.02 -13.7 Evening 1.40 0.80 -42.9 1.40 2.02 44.3 Night & Weekend 0.93 0.65 -30.1 0.93 2.02 117.2 926 - 1910 Day 2.40 $1.30 -45.8 2.40 2.02 -15.8 Evening 1.44 0.80 -44.4 1.44 2.02 40.3 Night & Weekend 0.96 0.65 -32.3 0.96 2.02 110.4 1911 - 3000 Day 2.70 $1.30 -51.9 2.70 2.02 -25.2 Evening 1.62 0.80 -50.6 1.62 2.02 24.7 Night & Weekend 1.08 0.65 -39.8 1.08 2.02 87.0 3001 - 4250 Day 2.80 $1.30 -53.6 2.80 2.02 -27.9 Evening 1.68 0.80 -52.4 1.68 2.02 20.2 Night & Weekend
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend199.pdf
  • 293 - 430Day 2.27 $1.40 -38.3 2.27 1.82 -19.9 Evening 1.36 0.80 -41.2 1.36 1.82 33.6 Night & Weekend 0.90 0.65 -27.8 0.90 1.82 101.9 431 - 925Day 2.34 $1.40 -40.2 2.34 1.82 -22.3 Evening 1.40 0.80 -42.9 1.40 1.82 29.8 Night & Weekend 0.93 0.65 -30.1 0.93 1.82 95.4 926 - 1910Day 2.40 $1.40 -41.7 2.40 1.82 -24.3 Evening 1.44 0.80 -44.4 1.44 1.82 26.2 Night & Weekend 0.96 0.65 -32.3 0.96 1.82 89.3 1911 - 3000Day 2.70 $1.40 -48.1 2.70 1.82 -32.7 Evening 1.62 0.80 -50.6 1.62 1.82 12.2 Night & Weekend 1.08 0.65 -39.8 1.08 1.82 68.3 3001 - 4250Day 2.80 $1.40 -50.0 2.80 1.82 -35.1 Evening 1.68 0.80 -52.4 1.68 1.82 8.2 Night & Weekend 1.12 0.65
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend200.pdf
  • Day 2.27 $1.48 (34.8) 2.27 2.30 1.3 Evening 1.36 1.13 (16.9) 1.36 2.30 69.1 Night & Weekend 0.90 0.73 (18.9) 0.90 2.30 155.6 431 - 925 Day 2.34 $1.48 (36.8) 2.34 2.30 (1.7) Evening 1.40 1.13 (19.3) 1.40 2.30 64.3 Night & Weekend 0.93 0.73 (21.5) 0.93 2.30 147.3 926 - 1910 Day 2.40 $1.48 (38.3) 2.40 2.30 (4.2) Evening 1.44 1.13 (21.5) 1.44 2.30 59.7 Night & Weekend 0.96 0.73 (24.0) 0.96 2.30 139.6 1911 - 3000 Day 2.70 $1.48 (45.2) 2.70 2.30 (14.8) Evening 1.62 1.13 (30.2) 1.62 2.30 42.0 Night & Weekend 1.08 0.73 (32.4) 1.08 2.30 113.0 3001 - 4250 Day 2.80 $1.48 (47.1) 2.80 2.30 (17.9) Evening 1.68 1.13 (32.7) 1.68 2.30 36.9 Night & Weekend
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend298.pdf
  • per Sensitive Sensitive Total Company Originating Terminating per per Charge per Access Access Access Access Conversation CCL CCL Local Minute Minute Minute Minute ** Minute *** Originating Terminating Switching Ameritech 0.47� 0.00� 0.77� 0.31� 2.71� 18,700 32,377 50,941 Bell Atlantic 0.80 0.00 0.62 0.17 2.48 23,041 46,847 70,045 BellSouth 1.41 0.03 0.80 0.27 3.74 27,870 45,484 73,846 NYNEX 1.26 0.00 1.44 0.26 4.85 18,536 36,892 56,308 Pacific Telesis 0.03 0.00 0.72 0.36 2.24 12,977 26,034 39,054 SBC 0.00 0.00 0.96 0.29 2.57 15,773 25,814 42,030 U S WEST 0.56 0.00 1.02 0.65 4.01 21,351 34,436 55,908 GTE 2.00 1.15 0.92 0.19 5.57 18,388 29,819 48,834 Aliant 0.06 0.00 1.52 0.32 3.85 258 426 688 Frontier 1.19 0.26 1.29 0.36 4.93 735
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend299.pdf
  • 293 - 430Day 2.27 $1.40 -38.3 2.27 1.82 -19.9 Evening 1.36 0.80 -41.2 1.36 1.82 33.6 Night & Weekend 0.90 0.65 -27.8 0.90 1.82 101.9 431 - 925Day 2.34 $1.40 -40.2 2.34 1.82 -22.3 Evening 1.40 0.80 -42.9 1.40 1.82 29.8 Night & Weekend 0.93 0.65 -30.1 0.93 1.82 95.4 926 - 1910Day 2.40 $1.40 -41.7 2.40 1.82 -24.3 Evening 1.44 0.80 -44.4 1.44 1.82 26.2 Night & Weekend 0.96 0.65 -32.3 0.96 1.82 89.3 1911 - 3000Day 2.70 $1.40 -48.1 2.70 1.82 -32.7 Evening 1.62 0.80 -50.6 1.62 1.82 12.2 Night & Weekend 1.08 0.65 -39.8 1.08 1.82 68.3 3001 - 4250Day 2.80 $1.40 -50.0 2.80 1.82 -35.1 Evening 1.68 0.80 -52.4 1.68 1.82 8.2 Night & Weekend 1.12 0.65
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend502.pdf
  • 1.32 1.43 1953 0.21 0.22 26.7 1.34 1.42 1954 0.22 0.22 26.9 1.43 1.41 1955 0.23 0.22 26.8 1.48 1.41 1956 0.23 0.22 27.2 1.48 1.39 1957 0.24 0.22 28.1 1.46 1.35 1958 0.24 0.22 28.9 1.42 1.31 1959 0.24 0.22 29.1 1.43 1.30 1960 0.24 0.22 29.6 1.40 1.28 1961 0.25 0.22 29.9 1.43 1.27 1962 0.25 0.22 30.2 1.44 1.25 1963 0.25 0.22 30.6 1.40 1.24 1964 0.25 0.22 31.0 1.38 1.22 1965 0.24 0.22 31.5 1.31 1.20 1966 0.24 0.22 32.4 1.29 1.17 1967 0.24 0.22 33.4 1.25 1.13 1968 0.24 0.22 34.8 1.17 1.09 1969 0.24 0.22 36.7 1.13 1.03 1/Estimates for 1930 through 1981 are based on information in AT&T Long Lines Statistics 1930-1963, 1946-1970, and
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend504.pdf
  • 0.91 0.20 0.99 0.30 3.82 01/01/99 06/30/99 0.82 0.16 0.98 0.32 3.71 07/01/99 12/31/99 0.37 0.10 0.86 0.28 2.82 01/01/00 06/30/00 0.32 0.10 0.86 0.31 2.85 08/11/00 06/31/004 0.23 0.07 0.52 0.26 1.91 07/01/01 12/31/01 0.15 0.07 0.48 0.24 1.71 01/01/02 06/30/02 0.15 0.07 0.47 0.24 1.69 07/01/02 06/30/03 0.02 0.01 0.48 0.22 1.46 07/01/03 06/30/04 0.00 0.00 0.48 0.22 1.44 Source: Access tariff filings. 4 Although the charges took effect on July 1, 2000, some companies made adjustments to the tariffs which did not take effect until August 11, 2000. 1 This table shows average rates (weighted by minutes of use) for all local exchange carriers (LECs) that file access tariffs subject to price- cap regulation and all LECs in
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend605.pdf
  • 0.91 0.20 0.99 0.30 3.82 01/01/99 06/30/99 0.82 0.16 0.98 0.32 3.71 07/01/99 12/31/99 0.37 0.10 0.86 0.28 2.82 01/01/00 06/30/00 0.32 0.10 0.86 0.31 2.85 08/11/00 06/31/004 0.23 0.07 0.52 0.26 1.91 07/01/01 12/31/01 0.15 0.07 0.48 0.24 1.71 01/01/02 06/30/02 0.15 0.07 0.47 0.24 1.69 07/01/02 06/30/03 0.02 0.01 0.48 0.22 1.46 07/01/03 06/30/04 0.00 0.00 0.48 0.22 1.44 07/01/04 06/30/05 0.00 0.00 0.50 0.25 1.53 Source: Access tariff filings. Rates in Effect From To Sensitive per Switched Interstate Charges for Switched Access Service Minute 2 Traffic Sensitive per Switched Minute Non-Traffic Minute 1 Carrier Common Line per Terminating Access Minute 1 Carrier Common Line per Originating Access 4 Although the charges took effect on July 1, 2000, some
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend801.pdf
  • Day 2.27 1.50 (33.9) 2.27 2.69 18.5 Evening 1.36 1.25 (8.1) 1.36 2.69 97.8 Night & Weekend 0.90 0.80 (11.1) 0.90 2.69 198.9 431 - 925 Day 2.34 1.50 (35.9) 2.34 2.69 15.0 Evening 1.40 1.25 (10.7) 1.40 2.69 92.1 Night & Weekend 0.93 0.80 (14.0) 0.93 2.69 189.2 926 - 1910 Day 2.40 1.50 (37.5) 2.40 2.69 12.1 Evening 1.44 1.25 (13.2) 1.44 2.69 86.8 Night & Weekend 0.96 0.80 (16.7) 0.96 2.69 180.2 1911 - 3000 Day 2.70 1.50 (44.4) 2.70 2.69 (0.4) Evening 1.62 1.25 (22.8) 1.62 2.69 66.0 Night & Weekend 1.08 0.80 (25.9) 1.08 2.69 149.1 3001 - 4250 Day 2.80 1.50 (46.4) 2.80 2.69 (3.9) Evening 1.68 1.25 (25.6) 1.68 2.69 60.1 Night & Weekend
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend803.pdf
  • 1.47 1994 148.2 0.18 0.21 0.93 0.14 1955 26.8 0.23 1.52 1995 152.4 0.17 0.20 0.91 0.12 1956 27.2 0.23 1.52 1996 156.9 0.16 0.18 0.76 0.12 1957 28.1 0.24 1.50 1997 160.5 0.15 0.16 0.69 0.11 1958 28.9 0.24 1.46 1998 163.0 0.14 0.16 0.58 0.11 1959 29.1 0.24 1.47 1999 166.6 0.14 0.15 0.54 0.11 1960 29.6 0.24 1.44 2000 172.2 0.12 0.12 0.52 0.09 1961 29.9 0.25 1.47 2001 177.1 0.10 0.10 0.35 0.08 1962 30.2 0.25 1.48 1963 30.6 0.25 1.44 1964 31.0 0.25 1.42 1965 31.5 0.24 1.35 1966 32.4 0.24 1.33 1967 33.4 0.24 1.29 1968 34.8 0.24 1.20 1969 36.7 0.24 1.16 Note: Data for some prior years have been revised. 1/ Billed revenue
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Intl/itrnd00.pdf
  • 1.52 1.41 1.29 1.29 1.08 0.96 0.76 0.62 Poland 1.02 1.07 1.07 1.10 1.06 0.90 0.85 0.73 0.76 0.57 0.41 Russia 16/ 2.11 2.03 1.97 1.99 1.94 1.82 1.57 1.28 1.17 0.69 0.62 Saudi Arabia 1.22 1.34 1.37 1.34 1.41 1.25 1.20 1.05 1.08 1.00 0.88 Sierra Leone 2.49 2.11 1.93 1.93 1.94 1.78 1.80 1.22 1.07 0.47 0.75 Singapore 1.44 1.51 1.51 1.48 1.38 1.19 1.08 0.85 0.56 0.56 0.58 South Africa 1.07 1.13 1.11 1.32 1.07 0.94 0.95 0.69 0.78 0.68 0.57 Spain 1.06 1.07 1.10 1.11 1.10 1.07 1.08 0.94 0.79 0.72 0.63 Switzerland 0.61 1.12 1.10 1.08 1.03 1.01 0.88 0.62 0.46 0.49 0.43 Taiwan 1.37 1.38 1.44 1.42 1.30 1.05 0.97 0.74 0.69 0.63 0.54 Thailand
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Intl/itrnd01.pdf
  • 0.70 0.60 0.46 Hong Kong 1.60 1.20 1.00 1.00 0.94 0.79 0.72 India 2.00 1.90 1.80 1.80 1.60 1.42 1.28 1.08 0.85 0.68 0.46 0.46 Israel 2.28 2.16 2.16 1.90 1.18 0.70 0.59 Italy 1.65 1.51 1.22 0.71 0.52 0.33 Jamaica 1.55 1.50 1.40 1.40 1.30 1.25 1.25 1.05 0.60 Japan 1.31 1.04 0.94 0.94 0.91 0.86 Korea, Rep. 1.60 1.44 1.41 1.26 1.23 0.98 0.85 0.71 0.51 Mexico 19/ 0.72 0.68 0.58 0.53 0.485 0.395 0.37 0.19 0.19 0.19 0.19 0.19 Morocco 3.03 3.04 3.27 1.78 1.45 1.09 0.83 0.82 0.77 0.38 Netherlands 0.69 0.69 0.59 0.37 0.36 0.27 Nigeria 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.40 1.15 0.77 0.51 Pakistan 2.30 2.30 2.30 2.30 2.20 2.00 1.20 1.20 0.84
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr03-3.pdf
  • 0.00 District Of Columbia -0.22 -0.54 0.32 0.00 Florida 4.59 -1.46 6.14 10.47 Georgia 6.39 -2.60 9.23 -2.49 Guam -9.34 0.00 -9.34 0.00 Hawaii 10.84 -0.31 11.19 217.38 Idaho 2.95 -0.88 3.87 3.72 Illinois -1.64 -2.42 0.80 24.24 Indiana 0.20 2.54 -2.28 8.39 Iowa 1.25 -1.41 2.70 33.47 Kansas 0.95 -3.83 4.96 14.79 Kentucky 2.14 -0.84 3.00 -2.35 Louisiana 4.89 -1.44 6.42 0.06 Maine 8.09 1.12 6.89 -5.41 Maryland 2.28 0.21 2.06 -1.49 Massachusetts 10.32 -2.67 13.34 -26.18 Michigan 0.18 -5.08 5.54 -9.16 Minnesota 2.96 -2.08 5.15 6.50 Mississippi 9.19 -0.70 9.96 54.13 Missouri 10.18 -1.78 12.18 9.37 Montana 0.83 -1.08 1.93 -3.45 Nebraska 2.88 -5.82 9.24 24.10 Nevada 3.90 0.94 2.93 1.73 New Hampshire -0.14 -0.60 0.47 -11.14 New Jersey
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr03-7.pdf
  • 4.47 4.67 19851.98 1.80 1.702.59 2.33 2.003.00 2.82 2.203.48 3.29 3.343.66 3.48 3.453.85 3.72 3.633.97 3.84 3.704.07 3.96 3.804.43 4.28 4.10 19861.75 1.67 1.612.26 2.12 2.112.57 2.47 2.462.95 2.85 2.843.14 3.04 3.033.33 3.25 3.243.44 3.35 3.343.54 3.46 3.453.79 3.68 3.67 19871.48 1.45 1.461.89 1.85 1.862.09 2.04 2.062.38 2.32 2.342.56 2.51 2.522.75 2.70 2.702.95 2.90 2.922.96 2.91 2.933.08 3.04 3.04 19881.47 1.44 1.441.78 1.75 1.761.98 1.94 1.942.16 2.12 2.132.34 2.40 2.402.43 2.50 2.502.64 2.69 2.712.64 2.71 2.732.75 2.84 2.84 19891.71 1.70 1.702.01 2.00 2.002.21 2.15 2.202.21 2.15 2.202.30 2.15 2.252.31 2.15 2.302.40 2.35 2.352.50 2.45 2.452.50 2.45 2.45 19901.71 1.70 1.711.97 1.90 1.901.97 1.90 1.902.15 2.10 2.102.15 2.10 2.102.30 2.10 2.302.39 2.30 2.302.49 2.40 2.402.49 2.40 2.40 19911.70 1.70 1.711.80 1.80 1.801.90
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr03-9.pdf
  • 4.2 49.0 36.3 31.2 117.2 460.8 For Unscheduled Events Over 2 Minutes 88.0 78.0 29.5 3.2 44.7 33.6 30.3 118.9 381.1 For Unscheduled Downtime More Than 2 Minutes Number of Occurrences or Events 33 42 25 8 11 26 13 42 71 Events per Hundred Switches 2.0 3.1 1.7 1.0 0.7 2.0 1.0 1.3 4.5 Events per Million Access Lines 1.44 2.68 1.31 0.46 0.72 1.49 0.61 2.49 8.93 Average Outage Duration in Minutes 72.7 41.4 28.6 5.1 111.8 27.6 52.2 147.7 139.8 Average Lines Affected per Event in Thousands 21.8 6.3 28.1 37.5 23.8 23.7 22.2 6.9 12.3 Outage Line-Minutes per Event in Thousands 766.9 218.7 644.9 171.9 2,900.1 483.1 163.6 859.8 1,896.0 Outage Line-Minutes per 1,000 Access Lines 1,102.5
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr04-1.pdf
  • Tennessee 2,776,868 1.20 0.56 1.04 171 205 Texas 14,920,108 6.47 8.36 6.94 1,138 1,364 Utah 760,202 0.33 0.49 0.37 60 72 Vermont 454,610 0.20 0.14 0.18 30 36 Virginia 7,440,911 3.23 3.34 3.25 534 639 Virgin Islands NA NA NA NA NA NA Washington 4,205,688 1.82 3.13 2.15 353 422 West Virginia 1,201,009 0.52 0.50 0.51 84 101 Wisconsin 3,329,004 1.44 1.39 1.43 234 281 Wyoming 246,582 0.11 0.13 0.11 18 22 Total 3/ 230,599,542 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% $16,455 $19,717 NA - Not Applicable. Note: LEC is an abbreviation for local exchange carrier. Figures may not add due to rounding. 1/ Access minutes are in thousands and include both originating and terminating minutes. 2/ Allocation percentage is a function of both
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr04-11.pdf
  • (19,470) (19,448) (22) 0.11 SBC - Ameritech - Michigan MI 24,113 24,332 (219) (0.91) Qwest - Minnesota MN 14,323 14,668 (361) (2.52) BellSouth - Mississippi MS (26,747) (26,844) 97 (0.36) SBC - Southwestern Bell - Missouri MO 42,009 42,109 (100) (0.24) Sprint - United Telephone Company of Missouri MO 2,660 2,692 (32) (1.20) Qwest - Montana MT (4,935) (4,872) (71) 1.44 Aliant Telecommunications - Nebraska NE (54) (40) (14) 25.93 Qwest - Nebraska NE (1,403) (1,303) (87) 6.20 Sprint - Centel of Nevada NV (1,168) (898) (270) 23.12 Verizon - Contel Nevada NV (132) (83) (49) 37.12 SBC - Nevada Bell NV 217 250 (32) (14.75) Verizon - New England - New Hampshire NH 48 206 (158) (329.17) Verizon - New
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr04-3.pdf
  • 11.85 45.56 401144 C CENTURYTEL OF CENTRAL ARKANSAS, LLC 5.91 -2.45 8.57 11.95 401144A C CENTURYTEL OF CENTRAL ARKANSAS, LLC -9.39 -0.16 -9.25 -92.42 401691 C ALLTEL ARKANSAS, INC. -8.07 -0.98 -7.16 -42.43 401692 C ARKANSAS TELEPHONE COMPANY -1.96 0.18 -2.13 -47.72 401697 C CENTRAL ARKANSAS TEL. COOP INC. 33.72 1.41 31.86 65.00 401698 C CLEVELAND COUNTY TEL. CO. -7.08 1.44 -8.40 -25.49 401699 C DECATUR TELEPHONE CO INC- ARKANSAS 0.45 -3.11 3.68 -3.30 401702 C SOUTH ARKANSAS TEL. CO.,INC. -0.92 0.29 -1.21 -8.14 401704 A LAVACA TELEPHONE-AR 12.24 1.89 10.16 INFINITE 401705 C CENTURYTEL OF ARKANSAS, INC. 1.78 -0.56 2.36 0.58 401709 C MADISON COUNTY TEL. CO. INC. -2.55 1.72 -4.19 -21.18 401710 A MAGAZINE TELEPHONE COMPANY 6.50 -2.23 8.93
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr04-7.pdf
  • 0.91 0.20 0.99 0.30 3.82 01/01/99 06/30/99 0.82 0.16 0.98 0.32 3.71 07/01/99 12/31/99 0.37 0.10 0.86 0.28 2.82 01/01/00 06/30/00 0.32 0.10 0.86 0.31 2.85 08/11/00 #06/30/01 0.23 0.07 0.52 0.26 1.91 07/01/01 12/31/01 0.15 0.07 0.48 0.24 1.71 01/01/02 06/30/02 0.15 0.07 0.47 0.24 1.69 07/01/02 06/30/03 0.02 0.01 0.48 0.22 1.46 07/01/03 06/30/04 0.00 0.00 0.48 0.22 1.44 * # Source: Access tariff filings. Although the charges took effect on July 1, 2000, some companies made adjustments to the tariffs which did not take effect until August 11, 2000. From This table shows average rates (weighted by minutes of use) for all local exchange carriers (LECs) that file access tariffs subject to price-cap regulation and all LECs in
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr98-7.pdf
  • 293 - 430Day 2.27 $1.40 -38.3 2.27 1.82 -19.9 Evening 1.36 0.80 -41.2 1.36 1.82 33.6 Night & Weekend 0.90 0.65 -27.8 0.90 1.82 101.9 431 - 925Day 2.34 $1.40 -40.2 2.34 1.82 -22.3 Evening 1.40 0.80 -42.9 1.40 1.82 29.8 Night & Weekend 0.93 0.65 -30.1 0.93 1.82 95.4 926 - 1910Day 2.40 $1.40 -41.7 2.40 1.82 -24.3 Evening 1.44 0.80 -44.4 1.44 1.82 26.2 Night & Weekend 0.96 0.65 -32.3 0.96 1.82 89.3 1911 - 3000Day 2.70 $1.40 -48.1 2.70 1.82 -32.7 Evening 1.62 0.80 -50.6 1.62 1.82 12.2 Night & Weekend 1.08 0.65 -39.8 1.08 1.82 68.3 3001 - 4250Day 2.80 $1.40 -50.0 2.80 1.82 -35.1 Evening 1.68 0.80 -52.4 1.68 1.82 8.2 Night & Weekend 1.12 0.65
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrd99-7.pdf
  • 293 - 430Day 2.27 $1.40 -38.3 2.27 1.82 -19.9 Evening 1.36 0.80 -41.2 1.36 1.82 33.6 Night & Weekend 0.90 0.65 -27.8 0.90 1.82 101.9 431 - 925Day 2.34 $1.40 -40.2 2.34 1.82 -22.3 Evening 1.40 0.80 -42.9 1.40 1.82 29.8 Night & Weekend 0.93 0.65 -30.1 0.93 1.82 95.4 926 - 1910Day 2.40 $1.40 -41.7 2.40 1.82 -24.3 Evening 1.44 0.80 -44.4 1.44 1.82 26.2 Night & Weekend 0.96 0.65 -32.3 0.96 1.82 89.3 1911 - 3000Day 2.70 $1.40 -48.1 2.70 1.82 -32.7 Evening 1.62 0.80 -50.6 1.62 1.82 12.2 Night & Weekend 1.08 0.65 -39.8 1.08 1.82 68.3 3001 - 4250Day 2.80 $1.40 -50.0 2.80 1.82 -35.1 Evening 1.68 0.80 -52.4 1.68 1.82 8.2 Night & Weekend 1.12 0.65
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrs01-0.pdf
  • 3.73 3.13 0.59 -17.47 Puerto Rico 13.18 2.61 10.30 34.95 Rhode Island -4.25 2.59 -6.66 0.00 South Carolina 3.79 3.62 0.17 1.23 South Dakota 2.74 2.72 0.02 32.34 Tennessee 3.41 2.33 1.05 8.07 Texas 3.92 4.42 -0.48 4.17 Utah -2.41 3.36 -5.58 12.49 Vermont -1.74 3.58 -5.14 2.81 Virgin Islands 5.04 6.32 -1.20 2.39 Virginia 3.98 4.11 -0.12 -8.11 Washington 1.44 2.36 -0.90 -1.76 West Virginia 4.76 2.79 1.91 19.03 Wisconsin 0.07 2.54 -2.40 15.61 Wyoming -0.98 2.48 -3.37 -6.70 Industry Total 3.03 2.86 0.17 5.14 * Percentage changes from 2000 to 2001 3 - 24 Jurisdiction 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 Alabama 609,062,745 631,828,641 662,073,026 668,647,749 686,660,612 Alaska 138,268,783 140,494,745 152,545,647 159,510,611 180,793,714 American Samoa 0 0 3,043,804 3,074,550 2,903,858
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrs02-0.pdf
  • Arizona 51,570 1.37 53,745 1.43 -2,175 -0.06 Arkansas 77,859 4.19 20,898 1.13 56,961 3.07 California 82,737 0.29 255,997 0.90 -173,260 -0.61 Colorado 62,194 1.72 52,728 1.46 9,465 0.26 Connecticut 1,104 0.04 41,315 1.35 -40,211 -1.31 Delaware 380 0.05 10,277 1.43 -9,897 -1.38 District of Columbia 0 0.00 14,859 1.34 -14,859 -1.34 Florida 84,390 0.61 175,902 1.28 -91,513 -0.66 Georgia 91,083 1.44 85,534 1.35 5,550 0.09 Guam 2,359 2.64 870 0.98 1,489 1.67 Hawaii 5,539 0.64 10,554 1.22 -5,015 -0.58 Idaho 43,568 4.72 13,605 1.47 29,963 3.24 Illinois 39,065 0.40 116,642 1.18 -77,577 -0.79 Indiana 42,434 0.95 48,817 1.10 -6,383 -0.14 Iowa 34,454 1.66 23,417 1.13 11,037 0.53 Kansas 81,466 3.92 24,892 1.20 56,574 2.72 Kentucky 34,024 1.27 32,564 1.22 1,461 0.05
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/SOCC/00socc.pdf
  • 2.40 2.28 2.16 2.16 1.90 1.18 0.70 0.59 0.30 0.30 0.30 Italy 2.15 2.14 2.04 1.65 1.51 1.22 0.71 0.52 0.33 0.22 0.22 0.21 0.20 Jamaica 1.75 1.65 1.60 1.55 1.50 1.40 1.40 1.30 1.25 1.25 1.05 0.60 0.38 Japan 10/ 1.76 1.91 1.62 1.31 1.04 0.94 0.94 0.91 0.86 0.29 0.29 0.27 0.26 Korea, Rep. 2.36 2.10 1.90 1.60 1.44 1.41 1.26 1.23 0.98 0.85 0.71 0.51 0.38 Mexico 11/ 0.89 0.791 0.75 0.715 0.68 0.58 0.53 0.485 0.395 0.37 0.19 0.19 0.19 Morocco 3.29 3.56 3.58 3.03 3.04 3.27 1.78 1.45 1.09 0.83 0.82 0.77 0.75 Netherlands 1.45 1.56 1.29 0.69 0.69 0.59 0.37 0.36 0.27 0.19 0.14 0.13 0.12 Nigeria 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/SOCC/01socc.pdf
  • 2.40 2.28 2.16 2.16 1.90 1.18 0.70 0.59 0.30 0.30 0.30 0.30 Italy 2.14 2.04 1.65 1.51 1.22 0.71 0.52 0.33 0.22 0.22 0.20 0.20 0.20 Jamaica 1.65 1.60 1.55 1.50 1.40 1.40 1.30 1.25 1.25 1.05 0.60 0.38 0.38 Japan 10/ 1.91 1.62 1.31 1.04 0.94 0.94 0.91 0.86 0.29 0.29 0.27 0.27 0.27 Korea, Rep. 2.10 1.90 1.60 1.44 1.41 1.26 1.23 0.98 0.85 0.71 0.51 0.38 0.38 Mexico 11/ 0.79 0.75 0.72 0.68 0.58 0.53 0.49 0.40 0.37 0.19 0.19 0.19 0.19 Morocco 3.56 3.58 3.03 3.04 3.27 1.78 1.45 1.09 0.83 0.82 0.76 0.77 0.76 Netherlands 1.56 1.29 0.69 0.69 0.59 0.37 0.36 0.27 0.19 0.14 0.13 0.13 0.13 Nigeria 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/SOCC/02socc.pdf
  • 0.70 0.59 0.30 0.30 0.30 0.30 0.30 Italy 9/ 2.04 1.65 1.51 1.22 0.71 0.52 0.33 0.22 0.22 0.21 0.20 0.21 0.22 Jamaica 8/ 9/ 1.60 1.55 1.50 1.40 1.40 1.30 1.25 1.25 1.05 0.60 0.38 0.38 0.38 Japan 8/ 9/ 1.62 1.31 1.04 0.94 0.94 0.91 0.86 0.29 0.29 0.27 0.27 0.28 0.29 Korea, Rep. 8/ 9/ 1.90 1.60 1.44 1.41 1.26 1.23 0.98 0.85 0.71 0.51 0.38 0.38 0.38 Mexico 8/ 10/ 0.75 0.72 0.68 0.58 0.53 0.49 0.40 0.37 0.19 0.19 0.19 0.19 0.19 Morocco 9/ 3.58 3.03 3.04 3.27 1.78 1.45 1.09 0.83 0.82 0.77 0.38 0.40 0.41 Netherlands 9/ 1.29 0.69 0.69 0.59 0.37 0.36 0.27 0.19 0.14 0.13 0.13 0.13 0.14 Nigeria 9/ 1.50 1.50
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/SOCC/03socc.pdf
  • 0.70 0.60 0.46 Hong Kong 1.60 1.20 1.00 1.00 0.94 0.79 0.72 India 2.00 1.90 1.80 1.80 1.60 1.42 1.28 1.08 0.85 0.68 0.46 0.46 Israel 2.28 2.16 2.16 1.90 1.18 0.70 0.59 Italy 1.65 1.51 1.22 0.71 0.52 0.33 Jamaica 1.55 1.50 1.40 1.40 1.30 1.25 1.25 1.05 0.60 Japan 1.31 1.04 0.94 0.94 0.91 0.86 Korea, Rep. 1.60 1.44 1.41 1.26 1.23 0.98 0.85 0.71 0.51 Mexico 7/ 0.72 0.68 0.58 0.53 0.485 0.395 0.37 0.19 0.19 0.19 0.19 0.19 Morocco 3.03 3.04 3.27 1.78 1.45 1.09 0.83 0.82 0.77 0.38 Netherlands 0.69 0.69 0.59 0.37 0.36 0.27 Nigeria 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.40 1.15 0.77 0.51 Pakistan 2.30 2.30 2.30 2.30 2.20 2.00 1.20 1.20 0.84
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/SOCC/95socc.pdf
  • 8AM-6PM 6PM-MIDN MIDN-8AM 8AM-6PM 6PM-MIDN MIDN-8AM ARGENTINA INTERNATIONAL DIAL $2.22 $1.47 $1.22 $1.97 $1.30 $1.09 ALL OTHER* 3.60 2.75 2.24 1.97 1.30 1.14 2PM-8PM 8PM-3AM 3AM-2PM 2PM-8PM 8PM-3AM 3AM-2PM AUSTRALIA (INCLUDING TASMANIA) INTERNATIONAL DIAL 1.93 1.26 1.10 1.71 1.12 0.99 ALL OTHER* 3.19 2.57 1.79 1.48 1.29 1.19 7AM-1PM 1PM-6PM 6PM-7AM 7AM-1PM 1PM-6PM 6PM-7AM AUSTRIA INTERNATIONAL DIAL 1.59 1.18 1.07 1.44 1.07 0.98 ALL OTHER* 2.08 1.54 1.32 1.46 1.09 0.99 8AM-5PM 5PM-11PM 11PM-8AM 8AM-5PM 5PM-11PM 11PM-8AM BAHAMAS INTERNATIONAL DIAL 1.28 0.92 0.84 1.14 0.84 0.76 ALL OTHER* 1.30 1.09 0.99 1.19 1.05 0.99 7AM-1PM 1PM-6PM 6PM-7AM 7AM-1PM 1PM-6PM 6PM-7AM BELGIUM INTERNATIONAL DIAL 1.84 1.17 1.03 1.65 1.04 0.94 ALL OTHER* 2.10 1.58 1.26 1.67 1.06 0.95 8AM-5PM 5PM-11PM 11PM-8AM 8AM-5PM
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/SOCC/96socc.pdf
  • & EXPENSES 2,601 1/ 43,374 11,412 10,145 14,261 1,011 INTEREST EXPENSE 131 334 514 478 721 93 OTHER INCOME & ADJUSTMENTS 2/ 2 690 326 435 550 67 INCOME TAXES 170 3,258 1,183 1,011 1,745 85 NET INCOME 292 5,908 2,134 1,882 2,863 185 EARNINGS PER SHARE 1.53 3.66 3.87 4.28 2.88 0.77 DIVIDENDS PER SHARE 1.06 1.32 2.03 2.80 1.44 0 AVG. SHARES OUTSTANDING (MIL.) 190 1,616 554 438 994 233 TOTAL ASSETS 5,359 55,552 23,707 24,856 32,568 4,523 PROPERTY, PLANT & EQUIP. (NET) 3,042 19,794 13,507 15,916 21,825 3,138 LONG-TERM DEBT 1,756 7,883 4,437 5,960 8,116 1,510 SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY 2,097 20,295 7,687 7,423 13,249 1,678 OPERATING DATA: CUSTOMER LINES (THOUS.) 1,681 - 19,704 20,566 22,135 834 NUMBER OF EMPLOYEES
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/SOCC/97socc.pdf
  • & EXPENSES 2,517 12,199 1/ 44,351 24,852 15,185 1,378 INTEREST EXPENSE 130 505 191 1,230 761 109 OTHER INCOME & ADJUSTMENTS 2/ 212 390 582 (128) 797 116 INCOME TAXES 321 1,388 2,721 1,529 2,151 7 NET INCOME 508 2,296 4,638 2,455 3,261 16 EARNINGS PER SHARE 2.72 2.09 2.85 3.16 3.29 0.06 DIVIDENDS PER SHARE 1.12 1.15 1.32 3.02 1.44 0 AVG. SHARES OUTSTANDING (MIL.) 186 1,099 1,630 776 992 253 TOTAL ASSETS 5,633 25,339 58,635 53,964 36,301 4,873 PROPERTY, PLANT & EQUIP. (NET) 3,190 13,873 22,710 35,039 22,861 3,668 LONG-TERM DEBT 1,874 4,610 6,826 13,265 7,348 1,707 SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY 2,209 8,308 22,647 12,789 15,165 1,679 OPERATING DATA: CUSTOMER LINES (THOUS.) 1,789 20,544 - 38,300 23,201 874 NUMBER OF EMPLOYEES
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/SOCC/98SOCC.PDF
  • MT NEBRASKA 44.6 0.382 44.2 42.2 2.03 2.03 NE NEVADA 15.8 0.001 15.8 16.3 (0.51) (0.51)NV NEW HAMPSHIRE 71.0 71.0 71.0 (0.01) (0.01)NH NEW JERSEY 535.3 535.3 520.2 15.08 2.0 3.8 5.8 9.29 NJ NEW MEXICO 41.4 0.001 41.4 41.4 0.03 0.03 NM NEW YORK 244.4 244.4 230.3 14.16 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.1 14.05 NY NORTH CAROLINA 96.9 96.9 95.5 1.44 1.44 NC NORTH DAKOTA 30.0 0.672 29.3 26.5 2.81 2.81 ND OHIO 209.9 0.120 209.8 211.4 (1.66) 0.1 0.4 0.004 0.5 (2.13)OH OKLAHOMA 142.5 0.001 142.5 141.7 0.76 0.76 OK OREGON 109.8 2.454 107.3 93.9 13.40 13.40 OR PENNSYLVANIA 408.7 0.001 386.4 363.1 23.34 2.0 3.9 5.9 17.42 PA RHODE ISLAND 252.3 4.503 247.8 245.5 2.36 2.36 RI SOUTH CAROLINA
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/SOCC/99socc.pdf
  • 1.80 1.80 1.60 1.42 1.28 1.08 1.08 Israel 2.40 2.40 2.28 2.16 2.16 1.90 1.18 0.70 0.59 0.30 0.30 Italy 2.14 2.04 1.65 1.51 1.22 0.71 0.52 0.33 0.22 0.22 0.21 Jamaica 1.65 1.60 1.55 1.50 1.40 1.40 1.30 1.25 1.25 1.05 0.80 Japan 1.91 1.62 1.31 1.04 0.94 0.94 0.91 0.86 0.29 0.29 0.28 Korea, Rep. 2.10 1.90 1.60 1.44 1.41 1.26 1.23 0.98 0.85 0.71 0.51 Mexico $.791/0.25 $.75/0.25$.715/0.25 $.68/0.25 $.58/0.25 $.53/0.28$.485/0.32$.395/.395 $.37/.37 $.19/.19 $.19/.19 Netherlands 1.56 1.29 0.69 0.69 0.59 0.37 0.36 0.27 0.19 0.14 0.13 Nigeria 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.40 1.15 0.92 Pakistan 2.30 2.30 2.30 2.30 2.30 2.30 2.20 2.00 1.20 1.20 1.20 Peru 2.00 2.00 1.50 1.40 1.30 1.30 1.23
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/SOCC/prelim02socc.pdf
  • 0.70 0.59 0.30 0.30 0.30 0.30 0.30 Italy 10/ 2.04 1.65 1.51 1.22 0.71 0.52 0.33 0.22 0.22 0.21 0.20 0.21 0.22 Jamaica 8/ 10/ 1.60 1.55 1.50 1.40 1.40 1.30 1.25 1.25 1.05 0.60 0.38 0.38 0.38 Japan 8/ 10/ 1.62 1.31 1.04 0.94 0.94 0.91 0.86 0.29 0.29 0.27 0.27 0.28 0.29 Korea, Rep. 8/ 10/ 1.90 1.60 1.44 1.41 1.26 1.23 0.98 0.85 0.71 0.51 0.38 0.38 0.38 Mexico 8/ 9/ 0.75 0.72 0.68 0.58 0.53 0.49 0.40 0.37 0.19 0.19 0.19 0.19 0.19 Morocco 10/ 3.58 3.03 3.04 3.27 1.78 1.45 1.09 0.83 0.82 0.77 0.38 0.40 0.41 Netherlands 10/ 1.29 0.69 0.69 0.59 0.37 0.36 0.27 0.19 0.14 0.13 0.13 0.13 0.14 Nigeria 10/ 1.50 1.50
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Orders/1997/fc97115a.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Orders/1997/fc97115a.wp
  • (ii)TheallowablemaximumERPforintermediatevaluesofHAATisdeterminedusing linearinterpolationbasedontheunitsemployedinthetable.ForDTVstationslocatedin ZoneIthatoperateonchannels7-13withanHAATthatexceeds305meters,theallowable E-30 maximumERPexpressedindecibelsabove1kW(dBk)isdeterminedusingthefollowing formula,withHAATexpressedinmeters: ERPmax=97.35-33.24*log10(HAAT) (iii)ForDTVstationslocatedinZoneIIorIIIthatoperateonchannels7-13withan HAATthatexceeds610meters,theallowablemaximumERPexpressedindecibelsabove1 kW(dBk)isdeterminedusingthefollowingformula,withHAATexpressedinmeters: ERPmax=62.34-17.08*log10(HAAT) (6)ADTVstationthatoperatesonachannel14-59allotmentcreatedsubsequenttothe initialDTVTablewillbeallowedamaximumERPof1000kWiftheirantennaHAATisat orbelow365meters. (i)AthigherHAATlevels,suchDTVstationswillbeallowedtooperatewithlower maximumERPlevelsinaccordancewiththefollowingtableandformulas: MaximumAllowableERPandAntennaHeight forDTVStationsOnChannels14-59,AllZones AntennaHAAT (meters) ERP (kW) 610 316 580 350 550 400 520 460 490 540 460 630 425 750 395 900 365 1000 (ii)TheallowablemaximumERPforintermediatevaluesofHAATisdeterminedusing E-31 linearinterpolationbasedontheunitsemployedinthetable.ForDTVstationslocatedin ZoneI,IIorIIIthatoperateonchannels14-59withanHAATthatexceeds610meters,the allowablemaximumERPexpressedindecibelsabove1kW(dBk)isdeterminedusingthe followingformula,withHAATexpressedinmeters: ERPmax=72.57-17.08*log10(HAAT) (g)ForDTVstationsusingachannelallotmentdesignatedwitha"c"inparagraph(b)of thissection,thepilotcarrierfrequencyoftheDTVsignalmustbemaintained5.082138MHz abovethevisualcarrierfrequencyoftheanalogTVbroadcaststationoperatingonthelower adjacentchannel,locatedwithin88kilometersoftheDTVbroadcaststation.Thisfrequency differencemustbemaintainedwithinatoleranceof�3Hz. (h)(1)Thefieldstrengthorvoltageofemissionsonfrequenciesoutsidetheauthorized channelofoperationmustbeattenuatednolessthanthefollowingamountsbelowtheaverage transmittedpowerwithintheauthorizedchannel.Atthechanneledge,emissionsmustbe attenuatednolessthan46dB.Morethan6MHzfromthechanneledge,emissionsmustbe attenuatednolessthan71dB.Atanyfrequencybetween0and6MHzfromthechannel edge,emissionsmustbeattenuatednolessthanthevaluedeterminedbythefollowing formula: AttenuationindB=46+[( f)2/1.44]; where: f=frequencydifferenceinMHzfromtheedgeofthechannel. (h)(2)Thisattenuationisbasedonameasurementbandwidthof500kHz.Other measurementbandwidthsmaybeusedaslongasappropriatecorrectionfactorsareapplied. Emissionsincludesidebands,spuriousemissionsandradiofrequencyharmonics.Attenuation istobemeasuredattheoutputterminalsofthetransmitter(includinganyfiltersthatmaybe employed).Intheeventofinterferencecausedtoanyservice,greaterattenuationmaybe required. Notetoparagraph(h):Greaterattenuationmayberequiredforsituationswherethe DTVstationandanadjacentchannelanalogTVstationservethesameareaandthere areexpectedtobelocationswithinthatsharedareawheretheanalogTVstation's fieldstrengthislessthan12dBabovetheDTVstation'sfieldstrength. 5.AnewSection73.623isaddedtoreadasfollows: �73.623DTVapplicationsandchangestoDTVallotments. (a)General.Thissectioncontainsthetechnicalcriteriaforevaluatingapplications requestingDTVfacilitiesthatdonotconformtotheprovisionsofsection73.622and petitionsforrulemakingtoamendtheDTVTableofAllotments(section73.622(b)). PetitionstoamendtheDTVTable(otherthanthosealsoexpresslyrequestingamendmentof thissection)andapplicationsfornewDTVbroadcaststationsorforchangesinauthorized DTVstationsfiledpursuanttothissectionwillnotbeacceptedforfilingiftheyfailto complywiththerequirementsofthissection. (b)InconsideringpetitionstoamendtheDTVTableandapplicationsfiledpursuanttothis E-32 section,theCommissionwillusegeographiccoordinatesdefinedinsection73.622(d)as referencepointsindeterminingallotmentseparationsandevaluatinginterferencepotential. (c)MinimumtechnicalcriteriaformodificationofDTVallotmentsincludedintheinitial DTVTableofAllotmentsandforapplicationsfiledpursuanttothissection.Nopetitionto modifyachannelallotmentincludedintheinitialDTVTableorapplicationforauthorityto constructormodifyaDTVstation,filedpursuanttothissection,willbeacceptedunlessit showscompliancewiththerequirementsofthisparagraph. (1)Requestsfiledpursuanttothisparagraphmustdemonstratecompliancewiththe principalcommunitycoveragerequirementsofsection73.625(a). (2)Requestsfiledpursuanttothisparagraphmustdemonstratethatthereisnoincreasein theamountofinterferencecausedtoanyotherDTVbroadcaststation,DTVallotment,or analogTVbroadcaststation.Forevaluatingcompliancewiththisrequirement,interferenceis tobepredictedbasedontheproceduresetforthinAppendixBoftheSixthReportandOrder inMMDocket87-268,FCC97-115,adoptedApril3,1997,includingserviceareas determinedinaccordancewithsection73.622(e),considerationofwhetherF(50,10)undesired signalswillexceedthefollowingdesired-to-undesired(D/U)signalratios,assumeduseofa directionalreceivingantenna,anduseoftheterraindependentLongley-Ricepoint-to-point propagationmodel.GuidanceforevaluatinginterferenceusingtheLongley-Rice methodologyisprovidedinOETBulletinNo.69.CopiesoftheSixthReportandOrderand OETBulletinNo.69maybeinspectedduringnormalbusinesshoursatthe:Federal CommunicationsCommission,1919MSt.,N.W.,DocketsBranch(Room239),Washington, DC,20554.ThesedocumentsarealsoavailablethroughtheInternetontheFCCHomePage athttp://www.fcc.gov.Thethresholdlevelsatwhichinterferenceisconsideredtooccurare: D/URatio _____________________________________________ Co-channel DTV-into-analogTV +34 analogTV-into-DTV +2* DTV-into-DTV +15* FirstAdjacentChannel LowerDTV-into-analogTV -17 UpperDTV-into-analogTV -12
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Orders/1998/fc98024.pdf
  • average transmitted power; 2) more than 6 MHz from the channel edge, emissions must be attenuated no less than 71 dB below the average transmitted power; and 3) at any frequency between 0 and 6 MHz from the channel edge, emissions must be attenuated no less than the value determined by the following formula:59 Attenuation in dB = 46 + [()f)2/1.44]; where: )f = frequency difference in MHz from the edge of the channel. In addition, in those cases where it was necessary to use adjacent channels in the same area, we paired and co-located adjacent NTSC and DTV channels to the extent possible. 87. Cannell, Fox, Gannett, the Joint MSTV Petitioners, Lincoln, Tribune and others request that we re-evaluate the
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Notices/2001/fcc01329.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Notices/2001/fcc01329.txt
  • J & J Broadcasting Inc 1972 0 0 0 C WDAR FM Soft AC Florence, SC 204Darlington SC Root Communications Group LP 1965 Jul-97 425 5.1 0.7 C3 WJMX AM Nws/Tlk/Spt Florence, SC 204Florence SC Root Communications Group LP 1947 Jul-97 250 3.2 0.7 B WJMX FM CHR Florence, SC 204Cheraw SC Root Communications Group LP 1979 Jul-97 1650 7.4 1.44 C2 WPFM AM Gospel Florence, SC 204Darlington SC Root Communications Group LP 1955 Jul-97 150 0 0 B WSQN FM Oldies Florence, SC 204Scranton SC Root Communications Group LP 1991 Jul-97 525 3.7 1.12 A WDSC AM Gospel Florence, SC 204Dillon SC Root Communications Group LP 1946 Oct-97 25 0 0 B WEGX FM Country Florence, SC 204Dillon SC Root
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Orders/2000/da001754.doc
  • meet the Commission's obligation under Section 307(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, and whether the policy has been detrimental to the enhancement of minority ownership of FM broadcast stations. Such a proposal can not be considered in the context of this rule making proceeding. Further, any such proposal should be filed as a separate pleading. See Section 1.44 of the Commission's Rules. All population data are based on the 1990 U.S. Census. The coordinates for Channels 290C and 244A at Shoshoni are 43-14-06 abd 108-06-36. The coordinates for Channel 231A at Dubois are 43-32-36 and 109-37-48. Federal Communications Commission DA 00-1754 Federal Communications Commission DA 00-1754 r s ) , O P 0 . 4 � � "
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Public_Notices/1997/d970886e.html http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Public_Notices/1997/d970886e.txt http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Public_Notices/1997/d970886e.wp
  • THE FCC ELECTRONIC FILING/APPLICATION REVIEW SOFTWARE Those applicants who wish to file their FCC application electronically or view other FCC applications on-line will need the following hardware and software: Hardware Requirements: * CPU: Intel 80486 or above (Pentium recommended) * RAM: 16MB RAM (more recommended if you intend to open multiple applications) * Hard Disk: 18MB available disk space* * 1.44MB 3.5" Floppy Drive (to install the remote system) * Five blank MS-DOS formatted 3.5" 1.44MB floppy disks * Modem: v.32bis 14.4kbps Hayes compatible modem * Monitor: VGA or above * Mouse or other pointing device * Additional disk space may be required if a large number of applications are stored in your local database. Software Requirements: The software for filing
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Public_Notices/1999/da990375.pdf
  • _____________________________________ Expiration date __________ Name on card _________________________________________________________________ Authorized signature ___________________________________________ Date ___________ Attachment E FCC Remote Bidding System Hardware and Software Requirements At a minimum, bidders need the following hardware and software: # #CPU: Intel� Pentium or above # #RAM: 16 MB (more recommended if you have multiple applications open) # #Hard Disk: 33 MB available disk space # #1.44 MB Floppy Drive or CD-ROM Drive (to install the Remote Bidding System) # #Modem: v.32bis 14.4 kbps Hayes� compatible modem or faster # #Monitor: VGA or above # #Mouse or other pointing device # #Microsoft� Windows 95� or Microsoft� Windows 98� # #Netscape� Communicator� 4.5 is recommended. However, you can also use Netscape Communicator 4.08, 4.07, 4.06 or 4.05 with
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Public_Notices/1999/da990482.pdf
  • Wireless One Technologies, Inc. 0221835384 cellutech Page 2 of 2 Page 2 of 2 Attachment D FCC Remote Bidding System Hardware and Software Requirements At a minimum, bidders need the following hardware and software: � CPU: Intel Pentium or above � RAM: 16 MB (more recommended if you have multiple applications open) � Hard Disk: 33 MB available disk space 1.44 MB Floppy Drive or CD_ROM Drive (to install the Remote Bidding System) � Modem: v.32bis 14.4kbps Hayes compatible modem or faster � Monitor: VGA or above � Mouse or other pointing device � Microsoft Windows 95/98 � Netscape Communicator 4.5 is recommended. However, you can also use Netscape Communicator 4.08, 4.07, 4.06 or 4.05 with JDK 1.1. Note: To download
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Public_Notices/1999/da990904.pdf
  • ___________________________________ Expiration date __________________ Name on card _______________________________________________________________________ Authorized signature ___________________________________________ Date _________________ Attachment D FCC Remote Bidding System Hardware and Software Requirements At a minimum, bidders need the following hardware and software: � CPU: Intel� Pentium or above � RAM: 16 MB (more recommended if you have multiple applications open) � Hard Disk: 33 MB available disk space � 1.44 MB Floppy Drive or CD-ROM Drive (to install the Remote Bidding System) � Modem: v.32bis 14.4 kbps Hayes� compatible modem or faster � Monitor: VGA or above � Mouse or other pointing device � Microsoft� Windows 95� or Microsoft� Windows 98� � Netscape� Communicator� 4.5 is recommended. However, you can also use Netscape Communicator 4.08, 4.07, 4.06 or 4.05 with
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Public_Notices/1999/da991800.pdf
  • Grande City, Texas SST77Ardmore, Oklahoma SST78Iowa Falls, Iowa SST79Deming, New Mexico SST80Augusta, Georgia Attachment E FCC Remote Bidding System Hardware and Software Requirements At a minimum, bidders need the following hardware and software: � CPU: Intel� Pentium or above � RAM: 16 MB (more recommended if you have multiple applications open) � Hard Disk: 33 MB available disk space � 1.44 MB Floppy Drive or CD-ROM Drive (to install the Remote Bidding System) � Modem: v.32bis 14.4 Kbps Hayes� compatible modem or faster (recommend 56.6 Kbps) � Monitor: VGA or above � Mouse or other pointing device � Microsoft� Windows 95� or Microsoft� Windows 98� � Netscape� Communicator� 4.61 is recommended. However, you can also use Netscape Communicator 4.5 or 4.51
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Public_Notices/2000/da000405.doc
  • before the auction begins, the Commission requests receipt of software orders by 5:30 p.m. ET on Tuesday, March 7, 2000. The minimum hardware and software specifications required for the FCC remote bidding system are listed below: CPU: Intel (R) Pentium or above RAM: 16 MB (more recommended if you have multiple applications open) Hard Disk: 33 MB available disk space 1.44 MB Floppy Drive or CD-ROM Drive (to install the Remote Bidding System) Modem: v.32bis 14.4 kbps Hayes(c) compatible modem (56.6 kbps recommended) Monitor: VGA or above Mouse or other pointing device "! lated Windows environment. Bidder Alerts: All applicants must certify on their FCC short-form (Form 175) applications under penalty of perjury that they are legally, technically, financially and otherwise
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Public_Notices/2000/da001800.doc
  • before the auction begins, the Commission requests receipt of software orders by 6:00 p.m. ET on Monday, August 21, 2000. The minimum hardware and software specifications required for the FCC remote bidding system are listed below: CPU: Intel (R) Pentium or above RAM: 16 MB (more recommended if you have multiple applications open) Hard Disk: 33 MB available disk space 1.44 MB Floppy Drive or CD-ROM Drive (to install the Remote Bidding System) Modem: v.32bis 28.8 kbps Hayes(c) compatible modem (56.6 kbps recommended) Monitor: VGA or above "! includes any other emulated Windows environment. Long-Form Applications: All applicants should be aware that at the long-form application stage, they will be subject to the more extensive reporting requirements contained in the Commission's
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Public_Notices/2000/da002260.doc
  • before the auction begins, the Commission requests receipt of software orders by 6:00 p.m. ET on Tuesday, October 17, 2000. The minimum hardware and software specifications required for the FCC remote bidding system are listed below: CPU: Intel (R) Pentium or above RAM: 16 MB (more recommended if you have multiple applications open) Hard Disk: 33 MB available disk space 1.44 MB Floppy Drive or CD-ROM Drive (to install the Remote Bidding System) Modem: v.32bis 28.8 kbps Hayes(c) compatible modem (56.6 kbps recommended) Monitor: VGA or above Mouse or other pointing device "! Windows environment. Long-Form Applications: All applicants should be aware that at the long-form application stage, they will be subject to the more extensive reporting requirements contained in the
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Public_Notices/2000/da002614.pdf
  • the Commission requests receipt of software orders by 6:00 p.m. ET on Tuesday, November 28, 2000. The minimum hardware and software specifications required for the FCC remote bidding system are listed below: � CPU: Intel � Pentium or above � RAM: 16 MB (more recommended if you have multiple applications open) � Hard Disk: 33 MB available disk space � 1.44 MB Floppy Drive or CD-ROM Drive (to install the Remote Bidding System) � Modem: v.32bis 28.8 kbps Hayes� compatible modem (56.6 kbps recommended) � Monitor: VGA or above � Mouse or other pointing device � Microsoft� Windows� 95� or 98� 12 47 C.F.R. �1.2109 (d). 13 See Qualcomm Incorporated Petition for Declaratory Ruling Giving Effect to the Mandate of the
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2002/FCC-02-105A1.html
  • Joint Statement at 3, 11; Starpower-Verizon Virginia Complaint, Exhibit D (First Starpower- Verizon Virginia Agreement) at 8, 1.61. 17 Starpower-Verizon Virginia Joint Statement at 3, 12; Starpower-Verizon Virginia Complaint, Exhibit D (First Starpower- Verizon Virginia Agreement) at 2, 1.7. 18 Starpower-Verizon Virginia Joint Statement at 3-4, 14; Starpower-Verizon Virginia Complaint, Exhibit D (First Starpower- Verizon Virginia Agreement ) at 6, 1.44. 19 47 U.S.C. 251(b)(5). 20 Implementation of the Local Competition Provisions in the Telecommunications Act of 1996, Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, 11 FCC Rcd 14171, 14249, 230 (1996) (``Local Competition Order NPRM'') (emphasis added) (subsequent history omitted). 21 Starpower-Verizon Virginia Joint Statement at 3, 13; Starpower-Verizon Virginia Complaint, Exhibit D (First Starpower- Verizon Virginia Agreement) at 17-18, 5.7.2, 5.7.3, 5.7.5.
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2002/FCC-02-112A1.html
  • Publ'g Co v. Walling, 327 U.S. 186, 217 (1946) (rejecting petitioners' argument that agency subpoena power would subject them to impermissible inconvenience, expense, and harrassment precisely because ``they may make appropriate defense surrounded by every safeguard of judicial restraint.'') (internal quotation omitted). 51 See NAL Response at 22-26. 52 See supra n.7. 53 See supra 3. 54 47 C.F.R. 1.43, 1.44. 55 Moreover, as we discuss above, see supra 17, even after the issuance of this Forfeiture Order, SBC may choose not to pay the forfeiture and to raise a challenge to our findings in a trial de novo should the Department of Justice prosecute any collection action we may refer. 56 47 U.S.C. 408. 57 47 U.S.C. 416(c). 58 See
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2002/FCC-02-32A1.html
  • not yet acted on our motion. 12 Peninsula observes that it filed a motion for stay of our February 2000 MO&O, which, it argues, we never directly addressed. It now ``renews'' its request that the Commission stay its May 2001 MO&O pending a final court determination of Peninsula's appeal. We dismiss Peninsula's request. Peninsula's request does not comply with section 1.44(e) of our rules, 47 C.F.R. 1.44(e), which requires that stay requests be filed as separate pleadings. Moreover, our May 2001 MO&O modified in significant respects the February 2000 MO&O, thereby rendering moot Peninsula's stay request of the February 2000 MO&O. In any event, we note that the mere pendency of such a motion does not give Peninsula the right to
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2010/FCC-10-43A1.html
  • and section 1.106 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. S: 1.106, that Farmers' Petition for Reconsideration IS DENIED. 19. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), 201, 203, 206, 207, 208, 209, and 405 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. S:S: 154(i), 154(j), 201, 203, 206, 207, 208, 209, and 405, and sections 1.43, 1.44(e) and 1.106 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. S:S: 1.43, 1.44(e), and 1.106, that Farmers' Petition for Stay IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Marlene H. Dortch Secretary Petition for Reconsideration, File No. EB-07-MD-001 (filed Dec. 18, 2009) ("Petition for Reconsideration"). Qwest Commc'ns Corp. v. Farmers and Merchants Mut. Tel. Co., Second Order on Reconsideration, 24 FCC Rcd 14801 (2009) ("Second
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-08-1891A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-08-1891A1.pdf
  • We believe that the public interest in maintaining a competitive balance in the Concord Metro is best served by terminating the JSA so that it will comply with the ownership limit for the Concord market. Request for Stay. Nassau's request to stay the effectiveness of Note 2 is subject to dismissal on numerous procedural grounds. As an initial matter, Section 1.44(e) of the Rules requires that a stay request must be filed as a separate pleading. Nassau, however, combined is waiver and stay requests in a single pleading. The Request, thus, is subject to dismissal on this basis alone. Pursuant to Section 1.429(k) of the Rules, ``upon good cause shown, the Commission will stay the effective date of a rule pending
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-09-209A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-09-209A1.pdf
  • 2. Petition at 5-6. See Aspen FM, Inc., Memorandum Opinion and Order, 12 FCC Rcd 17852, 17855 (1997) (citing North American Broadcasting Co., Inc., 15 FCC 2d 979 (1969)). Fatima Response, Inc., Memorandum Opinion and Order, 14 FCC Rcd 18543, 18546 (1999), recon. dismissed, 15 FCC Rcd 10520 (2000). See Opposition at 3 and Ex. 2. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.44(e). . / � ", 259 F.2d 921, 925 (D.C. Cir. 1958)). Plus has not addressed, much less met, the prerequisites for a stay. Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C. 20554 February 10, 2009 �%���PNG �` �` b``D� 4 �&)�@�-�@�@�7 H >��O��� p j�� �2�=��k��� �"_� - J��, �Nt�Rb �7�P���U�ZS '��wp��ˈ jP�T{.|�87w]�g��yA�Ҩ-��=T#�O> �#W p����U�^S� �t�''�TxNt�l ۦ��X6`T{������:�r�� �A�R\ )]h]e�M8�I̟`�?K^��� ?C��A�UU �3ꡟ=��A � \�+�_
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-09-2541A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-09-2541A1.pdf
  • arguments identical to those previously considered and rejected by the Bureau. Joint Opposition at 3. Joint Opposition at 2. Gresham states that the Joint Opposition provided no response to the Petition to Deny, but instead, merely, attempted to ``incorporate by reference'' the previously filed Opposition to Gresham's Application for Review. Gresham argues that such procedure is improper citing 47 C.F.R. �1.44. Reply at 2. Id. at 13-14. Although not in response to Gresham's filing of the Decision Letter with the Court, on September 2, 2009, the Court ordered Gresham to pay certain attorneys' fees claimed by Caswell and the Receiver. See Ex Parte: Saunders v. Gresham Communications of Walterboro, Inc., No. 92-CP-15-508, slip op. at 7 (SC Ct. of Com. Pleas.
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-12-2A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-12-2A1.pdf
  • Religion Formats Contour Measure All Market Ratings 0.018 (0.17) 0.002 (0.21) 0.014 (0.17) 0.014 (1.73) Home Market Ratings 0.088 (0.28) 0.001 (0.03) 0.027 (1.43) 0.029 (1.59) Market Measure All Market Ratings 0.018 (0.39) 0.017 (1.39) 0.004 (0.49) 0.007 (0.77) Home Market Ratings 0.088 (0.28) 0.015 (0.53) 0.002 (0.12) 0.008 (0.53) Contour/Market Measure All Market Ratings 0.018 (0.17) 0.006 (0.27) 0.021 (1.44) 0.022 (1.54) Home Market Ratings 0.088 (0.28) 0.004 (0.12) 0.024 (1.02) 0.028 (1.23) * - estimated regression coefficient is different from zero at the 95 percent level of confidence. ** - estimated regression coefficient is different from zero at the 99 percent level of confidence. The coefficient on the number of LPFM stations is reported. Other coefficients are not reported.
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/FCC-02-32A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/FCC-02-32A1.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/FCC-02-32A1.txt
  • has not yet acted on our motion. Peninsula observes that it filed a motion for stay of our February 2000 MO&O, which, it argues, we never directly addressed. It now ``renews'' its request that the Commission stay its May 2001 MO&O pending a final court determination of Peninsula's appeal. We dismiss Peninsula's request. Peninsula's request does not comply with section 1.44(e) of our rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.44(e), which requires that stay requests be filed as separate pleadings. Moreover, our May 2001 MO&O modified in significant respects the February 2000 MO&O, thereby rendering moot Peninsula's stay request of the February 2000 MO&O. In any event, we note that the mere pendency of such a motion does not give Peninsula the right
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/FCC-10-101A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/FCC-10-101A1.pdf
  • this same allegation. To the extent that Cherry raises new issues on review, the application for review is subject to dismissal for violation of Section 1.115(c). Finally, the application for review includes a request to stay the Staff Decision. The request for stay is deficient on two grounds. First, Cherry provides no showing in support of this request. Second, Section 1.44(e) of the Rules requires that a request to stay the effectiveness of an order must be filed as a separate pleading and directs the Commission not to consider such a request when not filed as a separate pleading. Thus, the request for stay will be dismissed. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that the application for review of Dr. Glenn Cherry and
• http://www.fcc.gov/ib/pd/pf/csreport.pdf
  • 2,520 4,021 542 0.46 2.89 5.82 7.00 6 20 23 29 29Argentina 779 3,150 30 3,959 1,128 0.24 0.46 0.76 1.34 6 21 28 27 23Colombia 1,391 2,273 24 3,688 1,313 0.61 1.26 1.54 3.11 7 22 15 17 17Taiwan 1,647 1,837 48 3,532 4,580 0.87 0.71 1.64 2.32 7 23 n.a. 21 18India 1,453 1,986 23 3,462 734 0.72 1.44 1.77 2.50 1 24 17 18 12Italy 2,650 709 92 3,451 1,765 3.31 2.60 2.09 2.34 9 25 26 28 27Russia 1,528 1,484 40 3,052 439 1.00 1.53 2.38 3.53 7 26 22 25 22China 1,673 1,320 21 3,014 1,223 1.25 1.92 3.56 4.27 4 27 20 14 13Dominican Republic 2,297 556 0 2,853 633 4.13 5.17 3.10 2.15 2
• http://www.fcc.gov/ib/sand/mniab/traffic/files/ITRND01.pdf
  • 1.25 1.20 1.20 1.20 1.20 1.00 0.92 0.70 0.60 0.46 Hong Kong 1.20 1.00 1.00 0.94 0.79 0.72 India 1.90 1.80 1.80 1.60 1.42 1.28 1.08 0.85 0.68 0.46 0.46 Israel 2.16 2.16 1.90 1.18 0.70 0.59 Italy 1.51 1.22 0.71 0.52 0.33 Jamaica 1.50 1.40 1.40 1.30 1.25 1.25 1.05 0.60 Japan 1.04 0.94 0.94 0.91 0.86 Korea, Rep. 1.44 1.41 1.26 1.23 0.98 0.85 0.71 0.51 Mexico 20/ 0.68 0.58 0.53 0.485 0.395 0.37 0.19 0.19 0.19 0.19 0.19 Morocco 3.04 3.27 1.78 1.45 1.09 0.83 0.82 0.77 0.38 Netherlands 0.69 0.59 0.37 0.36 0.27 Nigeria 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.40 1.15 0.77 0.51 Pakistan 2.30 2.30 2.30 2.20 2.00 1.20 1.20 0.84 0.54 0.42 0.42 Peru 1.40
• http://www.fcc.gov/mb/peer_review/prlpfm_rpt_economic_study.pdf
  • Religion Formats Contour Measure All Market Ratings 0.018 (0.17) 0.002 (0.21) 0.014 (0.17) 0.014 (1.73) Home Market Ratings 0.088 (0.28) 0.001 (0.03) 0.027 (1.43) 0.029 (1.59) Market Measure All Market Ratings 0.018 (0.39) 0.017 (1.39) 0.004 (0.49) 0.007 (0.77) Home Market Ratings 0.088 (0.28) 0.015 (0.53) 0.002 (0.12) 0.008 (0.53) Contour/Market Measure All Market Ratings 0.018 (0.17) 0.006 (0.27) 0.021 (1.44) 0.022 (1.54) Home Market Ratings 0.088 (0.28) 0.004 (0.12) 0.024 (1.02) 0.028 (1.23) * -estimated regression coefficient is different from zero at the 95 percent level of confidence. ** -estimated regression coefficient is different from zero at the 99 percent level of confidence. The coefficient on the number of LPFM stations is reported. Other coefficients are not reported. t-statistics are
• http://www.fcc.gov/ogc/documents/opinions/1999/usta.html http://www.fcc.gov/ogc/documents/opinions/1999/usta.wp
  • such reason. Second, the X-Factor is calculated as the sum of two components, neither of which followed a trend during the period in question. In fact, their year-to-year fluctuations swamped the trend increments: Table 2 Year Difference between Difference between LEC & US changes in LEC and US changes total factor in inpu t prices productivity 1992 0.21 3.21 1993 1.44 3.26 1994 3.69 1.71 1995 1.78 5.04 1997 Order, 12 FCC Rcd at 16,785. Where's the trend? As the underlying variables appear to be thrashing about wildly, the FCC's conclusion that the trend in the difference between the two had some predictive value requires explanation. C. Partial reliance on AT&T estimates Finally, the LECs argue that in its treatment of
• http://www.fcc.gov/ogc/documents/opinions/2003/02-1131.pdf
  • amended by the Telecommunications Act of 1996 ``and as from time to time interpreted in the duly authorized rules and regulations of the FCC,'' see � 1.7], and refers to the payment arrangements that recover costs incurred for the transport and termination of Local Traffic originating on one Party's network and terminating on the other Party's network. Finally, under � 1.44 of the agreement, ``Local Traffic'' means traffic that is originated by a Customer of one Party on that Party's network and terminates to a Cus- tomer of the other Party on that other Party's network, within a given local calling area, or expanded area service (``EAS'') area, as defined in [Verizon]'s effective customer tariffs. Local Traffic does not include traffic