FCC Web Documents citing 1.43

as compiled by hallikainen.com/FccRules on 2012 07 01

• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-452A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-452A1.pdf
  • not be harmed if the stay is granted; and (iv) the public interest favors a grant of the stay. Indiana has not addressed these criteria, much less satisfied them. DECISION Indiana has failed to meet the fundamental pleading requirements for obtaining a stay. Accordingly, we are denying its motion. ORDERING CLAUSE Accordingly, pursuant to the authority of Sections 0.191, 0.392, 1.43 and 1.298(a) of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.191, 0.392, 1.43 and 1.298(a); Section 4(i) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. § 154(i) IT IS ORDERED that the Motion for Stay filed by the State of Indiana IS DENIED. This action is taken under delegated authority pursuant to Sections 0.191 and 0.392 of the Commission's
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-43A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-43A1.pdf
  • and 405, and section 1.106 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.106, that Farmers' Petition for Reconsideration IS DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), 201, 203, 206, 207, 208, 209, and 405 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 154(i), 154(j), 201, 203, 206, 207, 208, 209, and 405, and sections 1.43, 1.44(e) and 1.106 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.43, 1.44(e), and 1.106, that Farmers' Petition for Stay IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Marlene H. Dortch Secretary Petition for Reconsideration, File No. EB-07-MD-001 (filed Dec. 18, 2009) (``Petition for Reconsideration''). Qwest Commc'ns Corp. v. Farmers and Merchants Mut. Tel. Co., Second Order on Reconsideration, 24 FCC Rcd 14801 (2009)
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-1629A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-1629A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-1629A1.txt
  • reviewed RCN's motion for stay and will grant it pending resolution of its application for review before the Commission. Our action herein should not be construed as an indication of the eventual outcome of RCN's application. Rather, it is an acknowledgement that the issues raised by RCN bear further analysis. ordering clauses Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to Sections 1.41, 1.43 and 1.202(b)(2) of the Commission's rules, that the motion for stay filed by RCN Telecom Services, Inc. IS GRANTED, pending the resolution of the application for review. This action is taken pursuant to authority delegated by Section 0.321 of the Commission's rules. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION William H. Johnson Deputy Chief, Cable Services Bureau Brunson Communications, Inc. v. RCN Telecom Services,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-87A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-87A5.txt
  • per minute at peak rates for 1997 and 1998, Euro for 1999 Local Single Transit Double Transit 1997 1998 1999 1997 1998 1999 1997 1998 1999 Country Austria 7.61 1.80 1.82 7.61 1.80 1.82 8.41 2.37 2.40 Belgium 2.78 1.11 1.07 2.78 2.10 1.80 3.62 2.94 2.56 Denmark 0.98 0.98 0.93 1.82 1.82 1.67 2.22 2.22 1.91 Finland 1.81 1.42 1.43 1.81 1.42 1.43 4.20 2.81 3.28 France 0.71 0.70 0.61 1.73 1.71 1.50 2.55 2.52 2.23 Germany 1.00 0.99 1.01 1.71 1.69 1.72 2.61 2.58 2.63 Greece n/a 1.81 n/a n/a 1.81 n/a n/a 2.59 n/a Italy 1.54 1.51 1.00 2.52 2.47 1.60 n/a n/a 2.30 Ireland n/a 2.20 1.00 n/a 4.15 1.60 n/a 5.18 2.26 Luxembourg n/a 2.01 2.25
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2392A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2392A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2392A1.txt
  • petition for reconsideration. Our action herein should not be construed as an indication of the eventual outcome of Mediacom's Petition. ordering clauses Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, that the Request for Stay of Order filed by Mediacom Communications Corporation IS GRANTED until the Bureau acts upon Mediacom's Petition for Reconsideration. This action is taken pursuant to authority delegated by Sections 0.321, 1.43 and 1.102(b)(2) of the Commission's rules. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION William H. Johnson Deputy Chief, Cable Services Bureau Rancho Palos Verdes Broadcasters v. Mediacom Communications Corporation, DA 01-2008 (Cab. Serv. Bur., released August 27, 2001). Request at 1. Id. Id. at 2. Id.; see 47 U.S.C. § 534(h)(1)(B)(iii). Id. Opposition at 2, n. 2. Id. at 1. Id. at 2. Id.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2821A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2821A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2821A1.txt
  • that Charter Communications IS ORDERED to commence carriage of television station KWOG on its cable systems serving Wenatchee, Holly and Naselle, Washington, which will include Astoria, Oregon, unless Charter is technically capable of filtering out television broadcast signals between DMAs, as ordered in the October 4, 2001 Bureau Order. This action is taken pursuant to authority delegated by Sections 0.321, 1.43 and 1.102(b)(2) of the Commission's rules. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION William H. Johnson Deputy Chief, Cable Services Bureau African-American Broadcasting Company of Bellevue, Inc. v. Charter Communications (``African-American Broadcasting), DA 01-2298 (Cab. Ser. Bur., released October 4, 2001). 8 FCC Rcd 2965, 2976-2977 (1993). Section 614(h)(1)(C) of the Communications Act, as amended by the Telecommunications Act of 1996, provides that a
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1358A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1358A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1358A1.txt
  • in DIRECTV's Application for Review, the Bureau did not disregard the contract and did not conclude that Paxson could elect mandatory carriage and remain subject to the retransmission consent agreement. Any contentions in that regard are properly brought before a court of competent jurisdiction to interpret the contract in question. ordering clauses Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to Sections 1.41, 1.43, and 1.102 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.41, 1.43, and 1.102, DIRECTV's Motion for Stay IS DENIED. This action is taken pursuant to authority delegated by Section 0.283 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 0.283. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION William H. Johnson Deputy Chief, Media Bureau See DIRECTV Motion for Stay in CSR No. 5731-M (filed May 16,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1552A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1552A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1552A1.txt
  • injection level is ``no more than 20 db down average visual data subcarrier power level relative to peak of sync'' (and can be set from 20-34 db down). The data rate in the visual carrier is approximately 4.29 megabits per second (``Mb/s''). The dNTSC system also encodes data in the aural carrier of the NTSC signal, at a rate of 1.43 Mb/s, by negative amplitude modulation of the FM aural carrier; the modulation depth does not exceed 20%. Requirements for System Approval. Section 73.682(a)(24)(iii) sets forth the criteria for advance approval of insertion of non-video information into the active portion of the NTSC visual signal: (1) Use of the system by a television broadcast station shall not result in the significant
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2458A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2458A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2458A1.txt
  • amended, 47 U.S.C. § 154(i), and Sections 0.331 and 1.106 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.331, 1.106, the Petition for Reconsideration filed by Instapage Network, Ltd. on August 20, 2001 is hereby DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to sections 4(i) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 154(i), and sections 0.331 and 1.43 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.331, 1.43, the Request for Partial Stay filed by Instapage Network, Ltd. on August 15, 2001, is DISMISSED as moot. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to Section 4(i) 47 U.S.C. § 154(i), and Sections 0.331 and 1.106 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.331, 1.106, the Petition for Reconsideration filed by
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1305A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1305A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1305A1.txt
  • to the U.S. Court of Appeals.'' The U.S. Court of Appeals granted summary affirmance of the MO&O in Alee's appeal of the MO&O. We therefore dismiss both Requests for Stay as moot. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to sections 4(i) and 303(r) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 154(i), 303(r), and sections 0.331 and 1.43 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.331, 1.43, the Request for Stay filed by Alee Cellular Communications on August 6, 2002, IS DISMISSED as moot. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to sections 4(i) and 303(r) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 154(i), 303(r), and sections 0.331 and 1.43 of the Commission's rules, 47
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2069A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2069A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2069A1.txt
  • filed by Classic Cable of Louisiana, LLC and Friendship Cable of Arkansas IS GRANTED until the Bureau acts upon Classic's Partial Petition for Reconsideration. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, that Classic shall submit engineering studies consistent with the opinion above within thirty days of the release date of this order. This action is taken pursuant to authority delegated by Sections 0.283, 1.43 and 1.102(b)(2) of the Commission's rules. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Steven A. Broeckaert Deputy Chief, Policy Division Media Bureau 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.41, 1.102. The Order directed Classic to commence carriage of KEJB within 60 days of its release in the following communities: CSR-6268-M - Bernice (LA0287), Calion (AR0295, AR0296), Dubach (LA0288), Hamburg (AR0082), Junction City (AR0294), Junction City (LA0293), Lake
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1147A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1147A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1147A1.txt
  • 05-1085, __ FCC Rcd ____ (MB 2005). Comcast also filed a request for expedited consideration of its Petition which was responded to but not opposed. Because we are acting on the Petition in this Order, we find the request to be moot. The Petition for Declaratory Ruling is designated as FCC file or case no. CSR-6388-R. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.43; Applications of Alvin Lou Media, Inc. and KM Communications, Inc. for New AM Broadcast Stations, 19 FCC Rcd. 806, 812 at n. 44 (2004), citing Virginia Petroleum Jobbers Ass'n. v. FPC, 259 F.2d 921 (D.C. Cir. 1958) and Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Comm'n v. Holiday Tours, Inc., 559 F.2d 841 (D.C. Cir. 1977). See Cuomo v. NRC, 772 F.2d 972,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-166A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-166A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-166A1.txt
  • benefits the Commission articulated in the 800 MHz R&O, in furtherance of its mandate to promote safety of life, health and property through radio communications under the Communications Act, as amended. ORDERING CLAUSES Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED pursuant to the authority of Section 4(i) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. § 154(i), and Sections 1.41 and 1.43 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.41, 1.43 that the Motion for Partial Stay of the Land Mobile Communications Council, in the above-captioned proceeding, filed January 12, 2005, IS DENIED. It is FURTHER ORDERED pursuant to the authority of Section 4(i) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. § 154(i), and Sections 1.41 and 1.43 of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2479A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2479A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2479A1.txt
  • pursuant to 47 U.S.C. §§ 154(i), 155(c), 309(j) and 405, and 47 C.F.R. § 1.115, the Application for Review filed by Sainte Partners II, LP IS HEREBY DISMISSED for failure to comply with the requirements of 47 C.F.R. § 1.115. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to 47 U.S.C. §§ 154(i), 155(c), 309(j) and 405, and 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.41, 1.43, and 1.44, the Request for Stay of Auction No. 81 filed by Sainte Partners II, LP IS HEREBY DENIED. These actions are taken under authority delegated pursuant to 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.131 and 0.331(c). FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Catherine W. Seidel Acting Chief Wireless Telecommunications Bureau See ``Applicants for Low Power Television Construction Permits to be Awarded in Auction No. 81
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-675A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-675A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-675A1.txt
  • Verizon seeks thus would effect - not prevent - a change in the status quo. This result would be inconsistent with the purposes of a stay pending judicial review. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED pursuant to the authority of sections 1, 4(i), and 4(j) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151, 154 (i), 154(j), and sections 1.43 and 1.44 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.43, 1.44, that the Petition for Stay Pending Judicial Review submitted by Verizon in the above-captioned proceeding on February 25, 2005, IS DENIED. This action is taken under delegated authority pursuant to sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Jeffrey J. Carlisle
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-82A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-82A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-82A1.txt
  • as amended. Accordingly, as precedent dictates, we conclude that Movants have wholly failed the Virginia Petroleum test for grant of a stay and deny their Motion for Stay Pending Appellate Review. ORDERING CLAUSES Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED pursuant to the authority of Section 4(i) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. § 154(i), and sections 1.41 and 1.43 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.41, 1.43 that the Motion for Partial Stay of Decision Pending Appellate Review submitted by Mobile Relay Associates and Skitronics, LLC, in the above-captioned proceeding on November 19, 2004, IS DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to the authority of Section 4(i) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-199A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-199A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-199A1.txt
  • under the Communications Act, as amended. Accordingly, as precedent dictates, we conclude that Preferred has failed the Virginia Petroleum test for grant of a stay and deny its Request for Stay. ORDERING CLAUSES Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED pursuant to the authority of Section 4(i) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. § 154(i), and sections 1.41 and 1.43 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.41, 1.43 that the Request for Stay submitted by Preferred Communications Systems, Inc., in the above-captioned proceeding on November 9, 2005, IS DENIED. This action is taken under delegated authority pursuant to Sections 0.131 and 0.331 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.131, 0.331. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Michael J. Wilhelm Chief, Public
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1564A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1564A2.txt
  • OFDM signal) of the same power. Table 7-4. D/U Ratio With 8-VSB as Undesired Signal Relative to That with Bandlimited Gaussian Noise D/U Ratio Relative to Baseline (dB) Channel Offset A3 D3 I1 J1 M1 N1 O1 G4 Mean (dB) (Excluding G4) Standard Deviation (dB) (Excluding G4) N-6 -1.32 -1.25 -1.61 -0.73 -1.85 -0.87 -1.76 -3.72 -1.34 0.43 N-4 -1.31 -1.43 -0.92 -1.07 -1.66 -1.07 -0.87 -1.94 -1.19 0.29 N-3 -0.79 -1.85 -2.23 -1.73 -1.50 -2.38 -1.47 -0.26 -1.71 0.53 N-2 -0.76 -1.94 -2.31 -0.53 -1.31 -0.91 -0.71 -0.89 -1.21 0.68 N+2 0.02 -2.99 -1.94 -0.48 -0.04 -0.67 -0.40 0.50 -0.93 1.12 Mean -0.83 -1.89 -1.80 -0.91 -1.27 -1.18 -1.04 -1.26 -1.28 Std Dev 0.55 0.68 0.56 0.51 0.72 0.69 0.56
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3470A4.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3470A4.txt
  • NetworksTargetingOtherDiverseAudiences 2.65 2.55 2.67 2.72 Children'sProgramming "Children'sProgramming" 1.70 1.91 2.15 1.94 GMoviesorTV-Y/TV-Y7TV 3.18 3.28 3.04 2.94 Eitheroftheabove 4.88 5.19 5.19 4.88 FamilyProgramming NetworksTargetingFamilies 11.46 10.89 10.69 10.74 TY-GProgramming 11.35 12.18 11.93 10.94 Arts,Educational,orDocumentaryProgramming 8.32 7.46 7.05 7.62 Eitherofthetwoabove 19.67 19.64 18.98 18.56 AdultProgramming NetworksShowingAdultProgramming 4.84 4.60 4.89 5.52 NC-17MoviesorTV-MA-S/TV-MA-LTV 0.75 0.48 0.63 0.83 ViolentProgramming "ViolentProgramming" 1.52 1.71 1.94 1.63 TV-PG-VTelevision 1.43 1.45 1.54 1.41 TV-14-VTelevision 1.37 1.40 1.56 1.51 TV-MA-VTelevision 0.15 0.16 0.23 0.22 Anyofthethreeabove 2.95 3.01 3.33 3.14 Anyofthelasttwoabove 1.52 1.56 1.79 1.73 ReligiousProgramming NetworksShowingPrimarilyReligiousProgramming 1.64 1.56 1.49 1.40 "ReligiousProgramming" 3.31 3.15 2.92 2.79 OverallTargeting AverageTVContentRating(wherenotedforTV) 3.71 3.75 3.84 3.93 AverageMPAARating(wherenotedformovies) 3.99 3.93 3.98 3.95 Observations 61,31464,56067,53071,984 Notes:Reportedinthetableisthepercentageofquarter-hoursofprogrammingbyprogramtypeandyear. ItistheanalogofTable6splitoutbyyear.Averageisoverthesamenetworksandtimeperiodsdescribed inthenotestoTable6.Source:Authorcalculations.39 Table11: ProgramAvailabilitybyProgramTypeandTime 6:00p.m.-12:00a.m.EST(orequivalent),2weeks/year,2003-2006 Variable 2003 2004 2005 2006 NewsProgramming AnyNews
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3470A6.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3470A6.txt
  • Drive 1.9068 (0.43) -0.0034 (0.11) -4.9048 (-0.69) -0.1302 (-0.07) 0.000144 (0.53) -0.0689 161 Average Block, News, AM Drive 0.9254 (0.50) 0.0076 (0.57) 4.7581 (1.59) 0.2985 (0.38) -0.000085 (-0.75) 0.0212 161 Average Block, Sports, AM Drive -1.0400 (0.29) 0.0146 (0.58) -2.9481 (-0.52) -0.3340 (-0.23) -0.000205 (-0.96) 0.0751 161 Average Block, Advertisements, Evening -0.2326 (0.09) -0.0116 (0.66) -2.4954 (-0.58) 1.6611 (1.83) -0.000219 (-1.43) -0.0480 164 Average Block, Entertainment/Leisure/DJ Banter, Evening -0.8028 (0.20) 0.0090 (0.32) -8.3112 (-1.22) 0.2358 (0.16) -0.000040 (-0.16) -0.0623 164 Average Block, Music, Evening -9.6674* (1.99) -0.0551 (1.59) -8.9634 (-1.06) -0.7137 (-0.40) -0.000015 (-0.05) -0.0375 164 Average Block, News, Evening 2.7455 (1.70) 0.0054 (0.47) 5.4568 (1.94) -1.2399* (-2.08) -0.000011 (-0.11) 0.0409 164 Average Block, Sports, Evening 13.6651* (2.50) 0.0743 (1.91) 0.6487
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1375A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1375A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1375A1.txt
  • clearing all remaining low power television stations from the 700 MHz band by December 31, 2011.'' Thus, we find that NTA has not met any of the four prongs necessary to qualify for a stay. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to the authority of sections 1, 4(i) and 4(j) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, and section 1.43 of the Commission's Rules, the Motion for Stay of the National Translator Association IS DENIED. This action is taken under delegated authority pursuant to sections 0.61 and 0.283 of the Commission's Rules. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION William T. Lake Chief Media Bureau Amendment of Parts 73 and 74 of the Commission's Rules to Establish Rules for Digital Low Power Television, Television
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-452A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-452A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-452A1.txt
  • not be harmed if the stay is granted; and (iv) the public interest favors a grant of the stay. Indiana has not addressed these criteria, much less satisfied them. DECISION Indiana has failed to meet the fundamental pleading requirements for obtaining a stay. Accordingly, we are denying its motion. ORDERING CLAUSE Accordingly, pursuant to the authority of Sections 0.191, 0.392, 1.43 and 1.298(a) of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.191, 0.392, 1.43 and 1.298(a); Section 4(i) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. § 154(i) IT IS ORDERED that the Motion for Stay filed by the State of Indiana IS DENIED. This action is taken under delegated authority pursuant to Sections 0.191 and 0.392 of the Commission's
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-520A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-520A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-520A1.txt
  • same period, distributed uniformly on the celestial sphere in orbital planes separated equally around a reference plane. M. Richharia, Mobile Satellite Communications: Principles and Trends, Pearson Education Ltd 2001, § 2.3.3. Narrative Attachment to 12/21/2009 Amendment and Applications for License Modification at 15. Id. at 10. Id. at 9. Section 25.143(b)(2)(ii) and (iii) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.43(b)(2)(ii) and (iii), requires Big LEO systems to be capable of providing service in any given location between 70º North latitude and 55º South latitude at least 75% of the time and of providing service at all times at locations throughout the United States, Puerto Rico, and the U.S. Virgin Islands. Globalstar certifies that the 32-satellite constellation including second-generation satellites will
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-520A1_Rcd.pdf
  • with first-generation satellites.16Second, Globalstar requests modification of its license for first- generation space stations to permit the eight satellites launched in 2007 to be re-positioned to operate in (... Continued from previous page.) 9Narrative Attachment to 12/21/2009 Amendment and Applications for License Modificationat 15. 10Id.at 10. 11Id. at 9. 12Section 25.143(b)(2)(ii) and (iii) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.43(b)(2)(ii) and (iii), requires Big LEO systems to be capable of providing service in any given location between 70º North latitude and 55º South latitude at least 75% of the time and of providing service at all times at locations throughout the United States, Puerto Rico, and the U.S. Virgin Islands. Globalstar certifies that the 32-satellite constellation including second-generation satellites will
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-980A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-980A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-980A1.txt
  • customers the benefits of new advanced services and competition. In sum, we find that the Petitioners have not demonstrated that the balance of equities warrants a stay. ordering clause Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to the authority of sections 1, 4(i), and 4(j) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151, 154(i), 154(j), and section 1.43 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.43, the Emergency Motion for Stay of American Electric Power Service Corporation, Duke Energy Corporation, Entergy Services, Inc., Florida Power & Light Company, Florida Public Utilities Company, Oncor Electric Delivery Company, LLC, Progress Energy, Inc., Southern Company, and Tampa Electric Company IS DENIED. This action is taken under delegated authority pursuant to sections
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-106A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-106A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-106A1.txt
  • the lease expenses pursuant to the framework established in the FCC's Declaratory Ruling . . . ''' are contrary to Commission regulations and the Declaratory Ruling. Sandwich Isles ``ask[s] the FCC to stay NECA from its inappropriate course of conduct.'' DISCUSSION We dismiss the Sandwich Isles Motion without prejudice to its filing of an appropriate petition for declaratory ruling. Sections 1.43 and 1.44 of the Commission's rules, cited by Sandwich Isles as authority for the Commission action sought in its Motion, contain rules applicable to ``requests for stay of any order or decision'' and ``any request to stay the effectiveness of any decision or order of the Commission . . . .'' Here, Sandwich Isles does not seek a stay of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-2A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-2A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-2A1.txt
  • in table 17 are positive, though statistically insignificant. Table 17 Effect of LPFM Entry on the Ratings of Full-Service Commercial FM Stations with Particular Program Formats Miscellaneous Format Ethnic and Spanish Formats Religion Format Miscellaneous, Ethnic, and Religion Formats Contour Measure All Market Ratings 0.018 (0.17) 0.002 (0.21) 0.014 (0.17) 0.014 (1.73) Home Market Ratings 0.088 (0.28) 0.001 (0.03) 0.027 (1.43) 0.029 (1.59) Market Measure All Market Ratings 0.018 (0.39) 0.017 (1.39) 0.004 (0.49) 0.007 (0.77) Home Market Ratings 0.088 (0.28) 0.015 (0.53) 0.002 (0.12) 0.008 (0.53) Contour/Market Measure All Market Ratings 0.018 (0.17) 0.006 (0.27) 0.021 (1.44) 0.022 (1.54) Home Market Ratings 0.088 (0.28) 0.004 (0.12) 0.024 (1.02) 0.028 (1.23) * - estimated regression coefficient is different from zero at
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-208380A7.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-208380A7.txt
  • 11,344 4,229 0.13 0.26 0.42 0.52 7 10 10 8 9Korea, South 2,678 7,289 35 10,002 5,178 0.37 0.56 0.59 0.98 1 11 6 9 15Sweden 3,198 6,568 0 9,766 1,806 0.49 0.28 0.30 0.60 6 12 12 11 11Brazil 1,939 7,556 221 9,716 1,505 0.25 0.58 0.64 1.24 1 13 14 19 21Switzerland 1,991 6,570 0 8,561 2,133 0.30 1.43 1.11 1.33 3 14 24 26 28Israel 1,141 5,093 180 6,414 582 0.22 0.82 1.28 1.77 7 15 19 20 20Singapore 867 4,748 152 5,767 2,604 0.18 0.43 0.40 0.56 6 16 29 n.a. n.a.Chile 1,081 4,585 38 5,704 1,308 0.23 0.82 1.09 1.96 7 17 13 12 14Philippines 3,143 1,847 2 4,992 2,574 1.70 2.17 3.43 5.05 6 18
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-215526A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-215526A1.txt
  • Iowa Telecom 0.81 0.00 0.84 0.15 2.90 134 185 331 Qwest 0.00 0.00 0.54 0.18 1.47 21,018 39,686 61,107 SBC 0.00 0.00 0.43 0.21 1.30 64,610 92,623 158,985 Sprint 0.03 0.00 0.63 0.17 1.68 10,375 15,681 26,235 Verizon 0.20 0.00 0.44 0.21 1.54 58,300 131,143 190,087 Price Caps 0.07 0.00 0.45 0.21 1.42 186,646 342,940 530,987 NECA 1.00 1.40 1.59 1.43 8.62 16,085 17,824 17,354 All Price Caps and NECA 0.15¢ 0.07¢ 0.48¢ 0.24¢ 1.71¢ 202,731 360,764 548,341 Source: Access tariff filings. 2/ Non-traffic sensitive charges include charges assessed on a per-month, per-unit basis. Prior to 07/01/94 these charges were included in the average traffic- sensitive rates. 3/ The total charge per conversation minute consists of charges on the originating end
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-228584A3.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-228584A3.txt
  • 3,782 0.18 0.27 3.29 2.35 7 14 11 8 9France 8,595 12,722 10,091 31,408 4,462 0.38 0.29 0.51 1.65 7 15 15 15 15Taiwan 1,768 29,087 1 30,856 14,175 0.06 0.12 0.29 0.70 1 16 13 12 6Sweden 3,177 19,414 3,182 25,773 1,109 0.14 0.18 0.49 0.28 3 17 19 14 14Switzerland 4,586 20,842 0 25,428 1,711 0.22 0.45 0.30 1.43 6 18 14 9 11Hong Kong 2,783 15,166 3,193 21,142 8,113 0.15 0.11 0.11 0.26 1 19 26 20 n.a .India 1,993 10,888 0 12,881 1,555 0.18 0.40 0.46 1.40 7 20 20 19 13Philippines 6,588 5,675 2 12,265 3,611 1.16 1.11 1.59 2.17 6 21 22 n.a . n.a .New Zealand 1,786 3,418 6,110 11,314 2,642 0.19 0.13 1.63
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-255118A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-255118A1.txt
  • FOR 50% SURVIVAL PROBABILITY OVER 5 AND 10 YEARS TABLE 9 SUBSCRIBER PROFILES FOR 70% SURVIVAL PROBABILITY OVER 5 AND 10 YEARS Cox Proportional Hazards 5 Years Cox Proportional Hazards 10 Years Piecewise-Constant Hazard 5 Years Piecewise-Constant Hazard 10 Years Year Subscribers (in millions) Year Subscribers (in millions) Year Subscribers (in millions) Yea r Subscribers (in millions) 1 0 1 1.43 1 3.63 1 3.99 2 0 2 2.05 2 5.39 2 5.92 3 0 3 2.77 3 7.28 3 8.00 4 0 4 3.53 4 9.29 4 10.21 5 0 5 4.45 5 11.71 5 12.87 6 5.48 6 15.85 7 6.62 7 19.12 8 7.66 8 22.14 9 8.94 9 25.82 10 9.47 10 27.35 Cox Proportional Hazards 5
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A1.txt
  • Dakota * 39,413 0.13 5 8 10 13 Tennessee 349,588 NA 1.30 54 84 105 134 Texas 2,266,028 NA 8.40 353 542 680 868 Utah 235,170 NA 0.87 37 56 71 90 Vermont * 26,212 0.09 4 6 7 9 Virginia 738,479 NA 2.74 115 177 222 283 Virgin Islands 0 NA NA NA NA NA NA Washington 386,104 NA 1.43 60 92 116 148 West Virginia * 43,145 0.14 6 9 11 15 Wisconsin 526,343 NA 1.95 82 126 158 202 Wyoming * 30,733 0.10 4 6 8 10 Total 3/ 26,985,345 NA 100.00% $4,225 $6,486 $8,132 $10,371 NA - Not Applicable. * Data withheld to maintain firms confidentiality or CLECs have less than 100,000 lines in state. 1/ Industry
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A1.txt
  • 487.61 331159CENTURYTEL-CENTRL WI 0.00 124.18 314.67 349.46 414.70 335220WISCONSIN BELL 175.95 180.33 181.39 213.16 201.97 WYOMING Total 457.61 442.34 433.16 445.29 466.01 511595UTC OF THE WEST-WY 501.18 487.92 491.87 527.82 561.98 512251RANGE TEL COOP - WY 654.20 667.69 655.11 637.89 594.49 512289CHUGWATER TEL CO 457.53 520.63 514.83 533.25 530.87 512290ALL WEST COMM.-WY 371.10 463.19 490.57 434.05 581.47 512291DUBOIS TEL EXCHANGE 1,001.43 966.09 904.44 893.72 936.62 512295SILVER STAR TEL-WY 724.30 652.54 719.95 786.88 809.06 512296TRI COUNTY TEL ASSN 1,035.03 1,050.05 1,164.21 1,228.96 1,209.06 512297UNION TELEPHONE CO 503.03 534.05 604.32 568.82 506.55 512299CENTURYTEL OF WY. 391.50 407.09 384.56 429.45 438.22 515108QWEST CORP-WY 418.52 399.46 385.21 396.08 423.15 Grand Total 239.85 242.45 252.85 261.19 270.79 Source: National Exchange Carrier Association, Universal Service Fund 2004
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A13.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A13.txt
  • 19,379 (235) (1.23) SBC - Southwestern Bell - Kansas KS 1,855 1,902 (47) (2.53) ALLTEL Kentucky, Inc. - London KY (70) (54) (16) 22.86 ALLTEL Kentucky, Inc. - Lexington KY (352) (263) (89) 25.28 Cincinnati Bell Telephone Company - Kentucky KY 43 32 0 0.00 BellSouth - Kentucky KY (17,188) (17,291) 103 (0.60) BellSouth - Louisiana LA (17,608) (17,859) 251 (1.43) Verizon - New England - Maine ME (14,862) (14,773) (89) 0.60 Verizon - Maryland MD 38,972 39,722 (750) (1.92) Verizon - New England - Massachusetts MA 37,342 38,724 (1,382) (3.70) Verizon - North - Michigan MI (19,859) (19,849) (10) 0.05 SBC - Ameritech - Michigan MI (13,517) (13,317) (200) 1.48 Qwest - Minnesota MN 4,189 4,492 (302) (7.21) BellSouth -
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A3.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A3.txt
  • Dakota * 39,413 0.13 5 8 10 13 Tennessee 349,588 NA 1.30 54 84 105 134 Texas 2,266,028 NA 8.40 353 542 680 868 Utah 235,170 NA 0.87 37 56 71 90 Vermont * 26,212 0.09 4 6 7 9 Virginia 738,479 NA 2.74 115 177 222 283 Virgin Islands 0 NA NA NA NA NA NA Washington 386,104 NA 1.43 60 92 116 148 West Virginia * 43,145 0.14 6 9 11 15 Wisconsin 526,343 NA 1.95 82 126 158 202 Wyoming * 30,733 0.10 4 6 8 10 Total 3/ 26,985,345 NA 100.00% $4,225 $6,486 $8,132 $10,371 NA - Not Applicable. * Data withheld to maintain firms confidentiality or CLECs have less than 100,000 lines in state. 1/ Industry
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A4.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A4.txt
  • Carolina 7.83 8.25 8.08 3.50 3.50 3.49 1.75 1.75 1.75 9.58 10.00 9.83 13.08 13.50 13.32 North Dakota 3.50 8.25 8.00 0.00 3.50 1.86 0.00 1.75 0.93 3.50 10.00 8.93 3.50 13.50 10.79 N. Marianna Islands 8.25 8.25 8.25 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 8.25 8.25 8.25 8.25 8.25 8.25 Ohio 7.09 8.25 7.40 0.00 3.50 2.87 0.00 1.75 1.43 7.09 10.00 8.83 7.09 13.50 11.70 Oklahoma 7.02 8.25 7.21 0.00 1.22 0.45 0.00 0.61 0.23 7.02 8.86 7.44 7.02 10.08 7.89 Oregon 7.75 8.25 8.25 3.50 3.50 3.50 1.75 1.75 1.75 9.50 10.00 10.00 13.00 13.50 13.50 Pennsylvania 5.94 8.25 7.85 0.00 2.50 1.03 0.00 1.25 0.51 5.94 9.50 8.37 5.94 12.00 9.39 Puerto Rico 8.25 8.25 8.25 3.34
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A5.txt
  • 8.29 -23.31 0.00 Ohio -0.32 -3.37 3.16 6.17 Oklahoma -5.30 -5.50 0.21 12.10 Oregon 0.96 -3.80 4.95 -7.72 Pennsylvania 2.82 -4.11 7.23 38.82 Puerto Rico -8.77 -3.65 -5.31 -28.31 Rhode Island -1.04 -7.74 7.26 0.00 South Carolina 1.54 -2.54 4.18 -4.90 South Dakota 4.90 -6.06 11.66 28.10 Tennessee 0.36 -2.60 3.04 -9.42 Texas -6.69 -5.60 -1.16 4.67 Utah -3.62 -2.22 -1.43 -4.52 Vermont 6.73 -1.77 8.66 17.01 Virgin Islands -0.83 0.46 -1.28 -7.72 Virginia 6.21 -3.66 10.24 32.56 Washington 1.93 -2.54 4.58 -2.44 West Virginia 0.34 -2.54 2.95 -28.04 Wisconsin -2.33 -4.06 1.81 20.78 Wyoming 1.67 -2.85 4.65 -6.87 Industry -0.33 -3.87 3.68 3.28 * Percentage changes from 2004 to 2005. Source: Calculated from National Exchange Carrier Association data. Unseparated High-Cost
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A5.txt
  • 487.61 331159CENTURYTEL-CENTRL WI 0.00 124.18 314.67 349.46 414.70 335220WISCONSIN BELL 175.95 180.33 181.39 213.16 201.97 WYOMING Total 457.61 442.34 433.16 445.29 466.01 511595UTC OF THE WEST-WY 501.18 487.92 491.87 527.82 561.98 512251RANGE TEL COOP - WY 654.20 667.69 655.11 637.89 594.49 512289CHUGWATER TEL CO 457.53 520.63 514.83 533.25 530.87 512290ALL WEST COMM.-WY 371.10 463.19 490.57 434.05 581.47 512291DUBOIS TEL EXCHANGE 1,001.43 966.09 904.44 893.72 936.62 512295SILVER STAR TEL-WY 724.30 652.54 719.95 786.88 809.06 512296TRI COUNTY TEL ASSN 1,035.03 1,050.05 1,164.21 1,228.96 1,209.06 512297UNION TELEPHONE CO 503.03 534.05 604.32 568.82 506.55 512299CENTURYTEL OF WY. 391.50 407.09 384.56 429.45 438.22 515108QWEST CORP-WY 418.52 399.46 385.21 396.08 423.15 Grand Total 239.85 242.45 252.85 261.19 270.79 Source: National Exchange Carrier Association, Universal Service Fund 2004
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-266857A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-266857A1.txt
  • 1,343 2002 584 741 928 1,150 1,433 2003 564 768 932 1,142 1,441 2004 562 787 956 1,185 1,460 1980 2.61% 2.32% 2.18% 1.81% 1.51% 1981 2.96 2.52 2.24 1.95 1.55 1982 3.18 2.66 2.19 1.97 1.52 1983 3.13 2.82 2.24 2.02 1.55 1984 2.71 2.44 2.21 1.82 1.51 1985 2.72 2.41 2.20 1.81 1.39 1986 2.94 2.62 2.15 1.83 1.43 1987 3.24 2.57 2.31 1.85 1.44 1988 3.23 2.61 2.31 1.82 1.49 1989 3.05 2.61 2.30 1.88 1.43 1990 3.11 2.77 2.37 1.89 1.48 1991 3.08 2.80 2.28 1.84 1.45 1992 3.35 2.77 2.34 1.88 1.46 1993 3.27 2.70 2.45 1.96 1.53 1994 3.17 2.83 2.36 1.95 1.58 1995 3.38 2.71 2.41 1.99 1.55 1996 3.20 2.94 2.46 2.05 1.57
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A1.txt
  • 1.02 Georgia 4,611,880 88.0 1.14 Guam 67,059 0.0 NA Hawaii 665,486 99.8 1.00 Idaho 714,999 90.5 1.11 Illinois 7,323,440 95.0 1.05 Indiana 3,492,042 95.4 1.05 Iowa 1,540,622 81.0 1.23 Kansas 1,380,168 82.7 1.21 Kentucky 2,003,264 91.5 1.09 Louisiana 2,268,720 91.9 1.09 Maine 808,894 82.1 1.22 Maryland 3,606,266 99.8 1.00 Massachusetts 3,779,199 99.9 1.00 Michigan 5,688,091 96.2 1.04 Minnesota 2,703,043 70.1 1.43 Mississippi 1,328,966 92.8 1.08 Missouri 3,247,315 80.0 1.25 Montana 506,462 66.0 1.52 Nebraska 815,003 77.7 1.29 Nevada 1,267,684 95.4 1.05 New Hampshire 754,305 92.6 1.08 New Jersey 5,983,090 99.8 1.00 New Mexico 940,723 84.6 1.18 New York 11,284,257 96.5 1.04 North Carolina 4,596,547 89.6 1.12 North Dakota 347,899 51.7 1.93 N. Mariana Islands 24,480 0.0 NA Ohio 6,372,077 94.9 1.05
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A3.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A3.txt
  • 1.02 Georgia 4,611,880 88.0 1.14 Guam 67,059 0.0 NA Hawaii 665,486 99.8 1.00 Idaho 714,999 90.5 1.11 Illinois 7,323,440 95.0 1.05 Indiana 3,492,042 95.4 1.05 Iowa 1,540,622 81.0 1.23 Kansas 1,380,168 82.7 1.21 Kentucky 2,003,264 91.5 1.09 Louisiana 2,268,720 91.9 1.09 Maine 808,894 82.1 1.22 Maryland 3,606,266 99.8 1.00 Massachusetts 3,779,199 99.9 1.00 Michigan 5,688,091 96.2 1.04 Minnesota 2,703,043 70.1 1.43 Mississippi 1,328,966 92.8 1.08 Missouri 3,247,315 80.0 1.25 Montana 506,462 66.0 1.52 Nebraska 815,003 77.7 1.29 Nevada 1,267,684 95.4 1.05 New Hampshire 754,305 92.6 1.08 New Jersey 5,983,090 99.8 1.00 New Mexico 940,723 84.6 1.18 New York 11,284,257 96.5 1.04 North Carolina 4,596,547 89.6 1.12 North Dakota 347,899 51.7 1.93 N. Mariana Islands 24,480 0.0 NA Ohio 6,372,077 94.9 1.05
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A5.txt
  • 29,210,855 2.600 WYOMING 130,511,585 289,052 451.52 11,886,977 1.058 GRAND TOTAL 45,755,745,534 165,977,717 275.67 1,123,536,366 100.000 Source: National Exchange Carrier Association, Universal Service Fund 2005 Submission of 2004 Study Results(October 1, 2005) 3 - 29 Table 3.18 ILEC High-Cost Loop Support Data Percentage Changes from 2003 to 2004 by State or Jurisdiction State or Jurisdiction ALABAMA 1.74 -3.03 4.91 4.30 ALASKA -1.43 -6.56 5.49 -2.18 AMERICAN SAMOA -6.46 1.06 -7.44 -51.22 ARIZONA -3.62 -6.12 2.66 14.29 ARKANSAS -0.49 -3.05 2.64 -6.46 CALIFORNIA -1.16 -2.79 1.67 13.02 COLORADO -4.88 -3.70 -1.23 -7.81 CONNECTICUT -5.71 -4.25 -1.52 0.00 DELAWARE -0.28 -3.20 3.02 0.00 DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA -8.46 -4.93 -3.71 0.00 FLORIDA 3.72 -3.75 7.76 17.84 GEORGIA 3.74 -3.96 8.02 10.72 GUAM 0.81 -0.32 1.13
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A9.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A9.txt
  • carrier. No information is available for those carriers that are not in the NECA pool, but are subject to rate-of-return regulation. 7 - 28 2004 Minutes of Use Carrier (Millions) Common Line per Company Originating Access CCL CCL Local Minute** Originating Terminating Switching ALLTEL (KY & NE) 0.00 0.00 0.46 0.34 1.65 653 983 2,207 BellSouth 0.00 0.00 0.42 0.28 1.43 20,239 62,872 57,931 CenturyTel # 0.15 0.00 0.50 0.32 1.83 436 1,470 1,906 Cincinnati Bell 0.00 0.00 0.55 0.35 1.83 718 2,147 2,919 Citizens 0.09 0.00 0.50 0.44 2.01 1,715 4,650 6,362 Iowa Telecom 0.00 0.00 1.44 0.61 4.18 264 413 677 Qwest 0.00 0.00 0.64 0.16 1.65 15,005 27,878 43,048 SBC 0.00 0.00 0.42 0.24 1.37 57,163 52,400 114,303
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A1.txt
  • 0.51 0.39 0.20 1.69 Guam 5.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 6.14 0.00 0.00 11.15 Hawaii 2.65 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.86 0.31 0.27 5.10 Idaho 2.30 0.07 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.06 1.82 0.76 6.02 Illinois 0.19 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.32 0.13 0.12 0.77 Indiana 0.30 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.36 0.59 0.25 1.51 Iowa 0.95 0.12 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.43 0.22 1.01 3.73 Kansas 4.37 0.13 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.35 0.27 0.80 7.93 Kentucky 1.03 0.02 0.00 0.65 0.00 0.95 0.68 0.24 3.55 Louisiana 2.00 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.91 0.35 0.18 3.45 Maine 0.80 0.01 0.00 0.19 0.00 1.44 0.01 0.81 3.26 Maryland 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.06 0.02 0.11 Massachusetts 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.01
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A5.txt
  • 0.51 0.39 0.20 1.69 Guam 5.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 6.14 0.00 0.00 11.15 Hawaii 2.65 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.86 0.31 0.27 5.10 Idaho 2.30 0.07 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.06 1.82 0.76 6.02 Illinois 0.19 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.32 0.13 0.12 0.77 Indiana 0.30 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.36 0.59 0.25 1.51 Iowa 0.95 0.12 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.43 0.22 1.01 3.73 Kansas 4.37 0.13 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.35 0.27 0.80 7.93 Kentucky 1.03 0.02 0.00 0.65 0.00 0.95 0.68 0.24 3.55 Louisiana 2.00 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.91 0.35 0.18 3.45 Maine 0.80 0.01 0.00 0.19 0.00 1.44 0.01 0.81 3.26 Maryland 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.06 0.02 0.11 Massachusetts 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.01
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-284934A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-284934A1.txt
  • 1,441 2004 562 787 956 1,185 1,460 2005 596 847 1,035 1,227 1,532 2006 634 862 1,089 1,297 1,551 1980 2.61% 2.32% 2.18% 1.81% 1.51% 1981 2.96 2.52 2.24 1.95 1.55 1982 3.18 2.66 2.19 1.97 1.52 1983 3.13 2.82 2.24 2.02 1.55 1984 2.71 2.44 2.21 1.82 1.51 1985 2.72 2.41 2.20 1.81 1.39 1986 2.94 2.62 2.15 1.83 1.43 1987 3.24 2.57 2.31 1.85 1.44 1988 3.23 2.61 2.31 1.82 1.49 1989 3.05 2.61 2.30 1.88 1.43 1990 3.11 2.77 2.37 1.89 1.48 1991 3.08 2.80 2.28 1.84 1.45 1992 3.35 2.77 2.34 1.88 1.46 1993 3.27 2.70 2.45 1.96 1.53 1994 3.17 2.83 2.36 1.95 1.58 1995 3.38 2.71 2.41 1.99 1.55 1996 3.20 2.94 2.46 2.05 1.57
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287688A1.pdf
  • 112 142 Kentucky 337,467 1.13 58 82 109 138 Louisiana 394,199 1.32 68 95 128 161 Maine 134,610 0.45 23 33 44 55 Maryland 590,557 1.98 102 143 191 241 Massachusetts 978,953 3.28 168 237 317 400 Michigan 992,598 3.33 171 240 321 405 Minnesota 675,623 2.27 116 163 219 276 Mississippi 161,058 0.54 28 39 52 66 Missouri 425,768 1.43 73 103 138 174 Montana 61,726 0.21 11 15 20 25 Nebraska 244,058 0.82 42 59 79 100 Nevada 245,553 0.82 42 59 79 100 New Hampshire 195,539 0.66 34 47 63 80 New Jersey 993,630 3.33 171 240 322 406 New Mexico 76,512 0.26 13 18 25 31 New York 3,043,468 10.21 523 736 985 1,243 North Carolina 797,793
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287688A3.pdf
  • 112 142 Kentucky 337,467 1.13 58 82 109 138 Louisiana 394,199 1.32 68 95 128 161 Maine 134,610 0.45 23 33 44 55 Maryland 590,557 1.98 102 143 191 241 Massachusetts 978,953 3.28 168 237 317 400 Michigan 992,598 3.33 171 240 321 405 Minnesota 675,623 2.27 116 163 219 276 Mississippi 161,058 0.54 28 39 52 66 Missouri 425,768 1.43 73 103 138 174 Montana 61,726 0.21 11 15 20 25 Nebraska 244,058 0.82 42 59 79 100 Nevada 245,553 0.82 42 59 79 100 New Hampshire 195,539 0.66 34 47 63 80 New Jersey 993,630 3.33 171 240 322 406 New Mexico 76,512 0.26 13 18 25 31 New York 3,043,468 10.21 523 736 985 1,243 North Carolina 797,793
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287688A5.pdf
  • 0.89 0.62 0.25 3.44 Louisiana 2.60 0.03 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.16 0.36 0.18 4.34 Maine 0.61 0.01 0.00 0.16 0.00 1.21 0.01 0.72 2.71 Maryland 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.06 0.01 0.10 Massachusetts (0.00) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.04 0.01 0.05 Michigan 0.44 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.39 0.01 0.18 1.03 Minnesota 1.34 0.09 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.43 0.11 0.62 3.59 Mississippi 0.99 0.02 0.00 5.63 0.00 0.59 0.69 0.17 8.09 Missouri 1.25 0.04 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.89 0.25 0.21 2.64 Montana 3.53 0.03 0.00 2.77 0.00 2.93 0.12 1.03 10.41 Nebraska 2.15 0.07 0.00 0.72 0.00 2.11 0.60 1.25 6.91 Nevada 0.41 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.38 0.67 0.44 1.92 New Hampshire 0.03 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A1.txt
  • 1.02 Georgia 3,875,280 87.9 1.14 Guam 62,004 0.0 NA Hawaii 543,734 99.8 1.00 Idaho 632,849 90.4 1.11 Illinois 6,000,648 95.0 1.05 Indiana 2,854,564 95.3 1.05 Iowa 1,291,940 81.0 1.23 Kansas 1,104,052 82.5 1.21 Kentucky 1,667,945 91.5 1.09 Louisiana 1,802,351 91.7 1.09 Maine 675,014 81.9 1.22 Maryland 3,040,460 99.8 1.00 Massachusetts 2,969,742 99.9 1.00 Michigan 4,154,613 96.1 1.04 Minnesota 2,258,483 69.8 1.43 Mississippi 1,117,195 92.8 1.08 Missouri 2,759,571 90.1 1.11 Montana 417,198 65.8 1.52 Nebraska 679,178 77.7 1.29 Nevada 1,077,677 95.4 1.05 New Hampshire 617,676 92.5 1.08 New Jersey 4,516,948 99.8 1.00 New Mexico 822,959 84.3 1.19 New York 8,304,253 96.4 1.04 North Carolina 3,860,991 89.4 1.12 North Dakota 284,695 51.5 1.94 N. Mariana Islands 18,719 0.0 NA Ohio 4,924,217 94.9 1.05
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A3.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A3.txt
  • 1.02 Georgia 3,875,280 87.9 1.14 Guam 62,004 0.0 NA Hawaii 543,734 99.8 1.00 Idaho 632,849 90.4 1.11 Illinois 6,000,648 95.0 1.05 Indiana 2,854,564 95.3 1.05 Iowa 1,291,940 81.0 1.23 Kansas 1,104,052 82.5 1.21 Kentucky 1,667,945 91.5 1.09 Louisiana 1,802,351 91.7 1.09 Maine 675,014 81.9 1.22 Maryland 3,040,460 99.8 1.00 Massachusetts 2,969,742 99.9 1.00 Michigan 4,154,613 96.1 1.04 Minnesota 2,258,483 69.8 1.43 Mississippi 1,117,195 92.8 1.08 Missouri 2,759,571 90.1 1.11 Montana 417,198 65.8 1.52 Nebraska 679,178 77.7 1.29 Nevada 1,077,677 95.4 1.05 New Hampshire 617,676 92.5 1.08 New Jersey 4,516,948 99.8 1.00 New Mexico 822,959 84.3 1.19 New York 8,304,253 96.4 1.04 North Carolina 3,860,991 89.4 1.12 North Dakota 284,695 51.5 1.94 N. Mariana Islands 18,719 0.0 NA Ohio 4,924,217 94.9 1.05
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A4.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A4.txt
  • 7.88 13.50 10.58 Minnesota 6.50 8.25 7.16 0.00 3.50 1.84 0.00 1.75 0.92 6.50 10.00 8.08 6.50 13.50 9.92 Mississippi 8.25 8.25 8.25 0.00 3.50 3.36 0.00 1.75 1.68 8.25 10.00 9.93 8.25 13.50 13.29 Missouri 6.50 8.25 7.34 0.00 3.50 3.45 0.00 1.75 1.72 6.50 10.00 9.06 6.50 13.50 12.51 Montana 8.25 8.25 8.25 0.00 3.50 2.85 0.00 1.75 1.43 8.25 10.00 9.68 8.25 13.50 12.53 Nebraska 6.06 8.25 7.03 0.00 3.50 3.39 0.00 1.75 1.70 6.06 10.00 8.72 6.06 13.50 12.12 Nevada 5.53 8.25 6.30 0.00 3.50 1.86 0.00 1.75 0.93 5.53 10.00 7.23 5.53 13.50 9.09 New Hampshire 8.14 8.25 8.16 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 8.14 8.25 8.16 8.14 8.25 8.16 New Jersey 7.07 8.25 8.03
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A5.txt
  • CO. -16.31 -5.23 -11.69 -48.94 351141 A CORN BELT TEL. CO. -0.39 -2.67 2.34 -25.81 351146 A CUMBERLAND TEL. CO. -15.08 -2.25 -13.12 -49.05 351147 A DANVILLE MUT. TEL. CO. 0.09 -2.88 3.05 -22.07 351149 A FARMERS MUTUAL COOPERATIVE TEL CO (DEFIANCE) -19.11 -4.40 -15.39 -50.15 351150 A DIXON TEL. CO. -5.56 -2.20 -3.44 -37.34 351152 A DUMONT TEL. CO. -1.43 -3.55 2.20 -27.06 351153 A DUNKERTON TEL. COOP., INC. -1.63 -3.81 2.26 -26.92 351156 C EAST BUCHANAN TEL. COOP. -4.28 -4.03 -0.26 -9.72 351157 A ELLSWORTH COOP. TEL. ASSN. -14.07 -0.85 -13.34 -48.92 351158 C MINBURN TELECOMMUNICATIONS, INC. 14.78 -4.66 20.39 56.72 351160 A F&B COMMUNICATIONS, INC. -9.60 -5.33 -4.50 -39.04 351162 A FARMERS COOP. TEL. CO.-DYSART -2.41 -3.24 0.86
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-301823A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-301823A1.txt
  • 7.88 13.50 10.58 Minnesota 6.50 8.25 7.16 0.00 3.50 1.84 0.00 1.75 0.92 6.50 10.00 8.08 6.50 13.50 9.92 Mississippi 8.25 8.25 8.25 0.00 3.50 3.36 0.00 1.75 1.68 8.25 10.00 9.93 8.25 13.50 13.29 Missouri 6.50 8.25 7.34 0.00 3.50 3.45 0.00 1.75 1.72 6.50 10.00 9.06 6.50 13.50 12.51 Montana 8.25 8.25 8.25 0.00 3.50 2.85 0.00 1.75 1.43 8.25 10.00 9.68 8.25 13.50 12.53 Nebraska 6.06 8.25 7.03 0.00 3.50 3.39 0.00 1.75 1.70 6.06 10.00 8.72 6.06 13.50 12.12 Nevada 5.53 8.25 6.30 0.00 3.50 1.86 0.00 1.75 0.93 5.53 10.00 7.23 5.53 13.50 9.09 New Hampshire 8.14 8.25 8.16 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 8.14 8.25 8.16 8.14 8.25 8.16 New Jersey 7.07 8.25 8.03
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303886A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303886A1.txt
  • of Columbia 769 374 1,143 0.48 Florida 9,849 5,407 15,256 6.39 Georgia 4,821 2,658 7,480 3.13 Guam 62 43 104 0.04 Hawaii 652 403 1,055 0.44 Idaho 700 404 1,103 0.46 Illinois 6,675 3,356 10,032 4.20 Indiana 3,035 1,587 4,621 1.93 Iowa 1,392 735 2,127 0.89 Kansas 1,371 718 2,089 0.87 Kentucky 2,000 1,058 3,058 1.28 Louisiana 2,265 1,160 3,426 1.43 Maine 659 344 1,004 0.42 Maryland 3,284 1,779 5,063 2.12 Massachusetts 3,598 1,849 5,447 2.28 Michigan 4,813 2,316 7,129 2.98 Minnesota 2,607 1,288 3,895 1.63 Mississippi 1,293 728 2,021 0.85 Missouri 2,984 1,569 4,552 1.91 Montana 463 275 738 0.31 Nebraska 865 455 1,320 0.55 Nevada 1,373 756 2,129 0.89 New Hampshire 693 395 1,088 0.46 New Jersey 5,059 2,714
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303886A3.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303886A3.txt
  • of Columbia 769 374 1,143 0.48 Florida 9,849 5,407 15,256 6.39 Georgia 4,821 2,658 7,480 3.13 Guam 62 43 104 0.04 Hawaii 652 403 1,055 0.44 Idaho 700 404 1,103 0.46 Illinois 6,675 3,356 10,032 4.20 Indiana 3,035 1,587 4,621 1.93 Iowa 1,392 735 2,127 0.89 Kansas 1,371 718 2,089 0.87 Kentucky 2,000 1,058 3,058 1.28 Louisiana 2,265 1,160 3,426 1.43 Maine 659 344 1,004 0.42 Maryland 3,284 1,779 5,063 2.12 Massachusetts 3,598 1,849 5,447 2.28 Michigan 4,813 2,316 7,129 2.98 Minnesota 2,607 1,288 3,895 1.63 Mississippi 1,293 728 2,021 0.85 Missouri 2,984 1,569 4,552 1.91 Montana 463 275 738 0.31 Nebraska 865 455 1,320 0.55 Nevada 1,373 756 2,129 0.89 New Hampshire 693 395 1,088 0.46 New Jersey 5,059 2,714
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303886A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303886A5.txt
  • 391685 C VALLEY TELECOMM. 3.51 -6.17 10.32 4.82 391686 C GOLDEN WEST-VIVIAN -3.44 -3.44 0.00 -14.42 391688 A WESTERN TEL CO. 14.47 -4.62 20.01 63.47 391689 C WEST RIVER COOP 7.41 -3.11 10.86 8.63 395145 C QWEST CORP-SD -7.23 -9.54 2.55 0.00 TOTAL TENNESSEE -0.69 -7.24 7.06 -9.91 290280 C ARDMORE TEL CO -8.49 -7.03 -1.57 -100.00 290552 C CENTURYTEL-ADAMSVILL -1.43 -4.64 3.36 -12.86 290553 A BEN LOMAND RURAL -2.97 -3.90 0.97 0.00 290554 A BLEDSOE TEL COOP -5.36 -4.42 -0.98 0.00 290557 C CENTURY-CLAIBORNE -3.14 -4.06 0.96 -23.72 290559 C CONCORD TEL EXCHANGE 13.80 -6.79 22.10 65.55 290561 C CROCKETT TEL CO -10.45 -5.14 -5.60 -100.00 290562 C DEKALB TEL COOP -4.73 -5.26 0.55 -59.86 290565 A HIGHLAND TEL COOP-TN
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303886A7.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303886A7.txt
  • 129 335 0.39 Michigan 969 1,769 0.55 Minnesota 2,215 1,594 1.39 Mississippi 166 1,821 0.09 Missouri 338 1,799 0.19 Montana 656 705 0.93 Nebraska 1,479 811 1.82 Nevada 69 305 0.23 New Hampshire 0 380 0.00 New Jersey 0 0 NA New Mexico 410 856 0.48 New York 50 1,537 0.03 North Carolina 230 2,612 0.09 North Dakota 527 367 1.43 Northern Mariana Islands 0 69 0.00 Ohio 222 2,139 0.10 Oklahoma 325 1,378 0.24 Oregon 198 977 0.20 Pennsylvania 97 1,893 0.05 Puerto Rico 0 3,859 0.00 Rhode Island 0 55 0.00 South Carolina 30 1,205 0.02 South Dakota 1,183 503 2.35 Tennessee 363 1,827 0.20 Texas 267 3,280 0.08 Utah 459 531 0.87 Vermont 141 448 0.31 Virgin Islands
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-311775A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-311775A1.txt
  • 4.84 5.25 69.6 87.8 18.2 * 86.0 92.2 6.2 New York 1985 5.16 4.95 5.24 87.5 86.9 -0.6 94.5 94.2 -0.4 North Carolina 1986 5.25 5.25 5.25 83.6 92.5 8.8 93.5 95.8 2.3 North Dakota 1990 2.98 2.91 4.33 93.6 92.8 -0.8 96.2 97.9 1.7 Ohio 1987 5.25 5.24 5.25 88.5 93.4 4.9 95.0 3.8 5.5 Oklahoma 1996 1.22 0.59 1.43 78.9 94.3 15.4 * 91.8 3.3 11.0 Oregon 1986 5.23 5.22 5.25 90.5 93.6 3.0 95.3 6.6 12.9 Pennsylvania 1996 3.60 1.13 5.25 93.6 95.6 2.0 97.3 5.8 5.9 Rhode Island 1987 5.25 5.25 5.25 87.6 93.4 5.8 94.6 5.7 12.4 South Carolina 1995 5.25 5.25 5.24 76.2 89.6 13.4 * 92.0 2.8 11.4 South Dakota 1988 0.12 0.14 0.00
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-76A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-76A1.pdf
  • was carrying out its registration responsibilities, and, thus, was obligated to have contacted both the owner and the Commission pursuant to Section 17.6(a) of our Rules, 47 C.F.R. §17.6(a). We further note that WCA did not ask that we stay our rules pending evaluation of its petition. A stay of our Rules is permitted in accordance with 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.43, 1.44 (e). See, e.g., Ex Parte Comments of National Spectrum Managers Association at 2 (filed Nov. 6, 1998). Report and Order, 11 FCC Rcd at 4303-5. The Universal Licensing System is the integrated database and automated processing system developed by the WTB to facilitate electronic filing of wireless applications, licensing information, and public access to such information for all wireless
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-130A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-130A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-130A1.txt
  • under the revised measure recently approved by the New York Commission, and then excluding those I-codes that could have been discovered by a properly conducted acceptance test, Verizon shows that the gap between competitive LECs and retail I-code rate in September and November 2000 is eliminated and reduced to less than one percent in October 2000. The adjusted rate is 1.43 percent for September 2000, 4.04 percent for October 2000 and 1.94 percent for November 2000 compared to the weighted average during this period of 2.36 percent for competitive LECs and 3.30 percent for Verizon. See Verizon Massachusetts II Lacouture/Ruesterholz Decl. at para. 96 and Attach. AA. See Rhythms Massachusetts II Williams Decl. para. 26; Covad Clancy Decl. para. 10-23; see
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-112A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-112A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-112A1.txt
  • e.g., Oklahoma Press Publ'g Co v. Walling, 327 U.S. 186, 217 (1946) (rejecting petitioners' argument that agency subpoena power would subject them to impermissible inconvenience, expense, and harrassment precisely because ``they may make appropriate defense surrounded by every safeguard of judicial restraint.'') (internal quotation omitted). See NAL Response at 22-26. See supra n.7. See supra ¶ 3. 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.43, 1.44. Moreover, as we discuss above, see supra ¶ 17, even after the issuance of this Forfeiture Order, SBC may choose not to pay the forfeiture and to raise a challenge to our findings in a trial de novo should the Department of Justice prosecute any collection action we may refer. 47 U.S.C. § 408. 47 U.S.C. § 416(c). See
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-168A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-168A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-168A1.txt
  • use of the Commission's enforcement and prosecutorial discretion. We note in this regard that the Bureau resolved numerous similar situations through similar consent decrees or through admonishments. ORDERING CLAUSE Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to Sections 4(i), 4(j), 5(c)(4), and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 154(i), 154(j), 155(c)(4) and 503(b), and Sections 1.41, 1.43 and 1.115 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.41, 1.43, 1.115, that the ``Petition for Special Relief, or in the Alternative, Application for Review'' filed by the Office of Communications of the United Church of Christ, Inc. on February 15, 2002, IS DENIED, and that the ``Request for Stay'' filed by the Office of Communications of the United Church
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-331A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-331A1.txt
  • (days) 12.69 4.67 12.49 6.00 12.94 12.73 0.67 8.10 0.33 1,2,4,5 A.2.1.4.1.2PBX/<10 circuits/Non-Dispatch/FL (days) 5.49 4.79 6.50 2.87 4.52 1.17 1.90 1.05 3.30 1.17 2,4,5 A.2.1.4.2.1PBX/>=10 circuits/Dispatch/FL (days) 70.50 68.60 4.00 12.42 15.93 A.2.1.4.2.2PBX/>=10 circuits/Non-Dispatch/FL (days) 3.51 5.50 8.97 1.28 9.00 5.89 4.50 6.68 1.56 1,3,4,5 A.2.1.5.1.1Centrex/<10 circuits/Dispatch/FL (days) 6.56 1.00 7.24 8.15 6.51 6.03 1 A.2.1.5.1.2Centrex/<10 circuits/Non- Dispatch/FL (days) 1.43 3.04 2.18 1.55 4.18 0.89 5.83 2.00 3.72 5.00 1,3,4,5 A.2.1.5.2.1Centrex/>=10 circuits/Dispatch/FL (days) 9.70 14.78 13.32 11.32 10.54 A.2.1.5.2.2Centrex/>=10 circuits/Non- Dispatch/FL (days) 3.94 1.17 4.08 0.94 2.71 2.30 3.57 1.42 1,5 A.2.1.6.1.1ISDN/<10 circuits/Dispatch/FL (days)22.03 11.80 17.78 8.33 21.29 10.00 5.68 11.51 12.00 1,2,3,5 B - 7 Metric Metric Name [SQM Number] May June July August September Number and Disaggregation BST
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-241A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-241A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-241A1.txt
  • in Appendix A 2. See section 1.44(e) of the rules, which gives the Commission the discretion to grant temporary relief. See also generally section 4(i) of the Communications Act of 1936, 47 U.S.C. § 4(i), which authorizes the Commission to issue orders necessary to execute its functions. We note that petitions specifically requesting a stay, pursuant to sections 1.41 and 1.43 of the rules, as well as other relief, were filed on behalf of rural carriers by a rural association in its representational capacity and by individual counsel. To the extent that the Stay provided by this Order grants the relief provided in the Non-Nationwide Carriers Order, requests for relief made pursuant to any other pending petitions are also granted to
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-241A1_Erratum.doc
  • in Appendix A 2. See section 1.44(e) of the rules, which gives the Commission the discretion to grant temporary relief. See also generally section 4(i) of the Communications Act of 1936, 47 U.S.C. § 4(i), which authorizes the Commission to issue orders necessary to execute its functions. We note that petitions specifically requesting a stay, pursuant to sections 1.41 and 1.43 of the rules, as well as other relief, were filed on behalf of rural carriers by a rural association in its representational capacity and by individual counsel. To the extent that the Stay provided by this Order grants the relief provided in the Non-Nationwide Carriers Order, requests for relief made pursuant to any other pending petitions are also granted to
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-214A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-214A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-214A1.txt
  • 206-208, and 258, and sections 1.421 and 1.429 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.421 and 1.429, that this Fifth Order on Reconsideration in CC Docket No. 94-129 IS ADOPTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i), and 4(j) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151, 154(i), and 154(j), and sections 1.3, 1.43, and 1.429 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.3, 1.43, and 1.429, that the petitions for waiver, emergency partial stay, and reconsideration filed by the LEC Petitioners, LEC Commenters, TDS Telecom and the Nebraska LECs ARE DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i), and 4(j) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-12A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-12A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-12A1.txt
  • Standard error 1.15 0.84 0.20 0.06 0.03 5% Trimmed $8.07 $5.59 $1.58 $0.61 $0.13 Wireless competition ** Average $2.12 $2.58 $0.81 $0.23 $0.02 Observations 29 29 29 29 29 Standard error 1.16 0.61 0.17 0.05 0.01 5% Trimmed $2.07 $2.49 $0.79 $0.22 $0.02 Low penetration test Average $7.96 -$0.14 $1.25 $0.55 $0.09 Observations 36 36 36 36 36 Standard error 1.43 2.19 0.15 0.08 0.03 5% Trimmed $7.10 $1.52 $1.26 $0.53 $0.06 * Operating Expense does not include the following expenses: Corporate overhead, depreciation and amortization, interest expense, losses from sale or disposition of property, and extraordinary expenses. ** These averages include cable system prices in communities with an Effective Competition finding based on DBS or wireless competition, but not the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-169A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-169A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-169A1.txt
  • method of moments. The first regression differs from the Adelphia Order only in adding TEAM COUNT. Table 1 DBS Penetration and RSN Access Independent Variables Dependent Variable: LN DBS PENETRATION Coefficient z-statistic LN CABLE PRICE 2.11* 2.15 LN CABLE CHANNELS -1.11* -2.61 PHILLY -0.53* -6.59 SANDIEGO -0.47* -5.52 CHARLOTTE -0.21 -1.45 KEYDMA 0.21* 3.29 TEAM COUNT -0.03 -1.94 DBSOVERAIR -0.09 -1.43 CABLECOMP 0.27 1.18 HDTV -0.12 -1.53 INTERNET -0.06 -0.52 LN INCOME -0.29* -2.44 LN MULTIDWELL -0.37* -10.45 LN LATITUDE -0.01 -0.03 CONSTANT -0.73 -0.26 Observations 676 Centered R-Squared 0.26 F-Statistic (14, 661) 40.57 Hansen J Statistic 27.22 * - significant at 95% confidence level Most coefficients change only slightly in terms of statistical significance or magnitude as compared to the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-236A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-236A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-236A1.txt
  • filing deadline, for seeking judicial review). 47 C.F.R. § 1.4(b)(2). See Council Tree Communications v. FCC, 503 F.3d at 284, 287-91 (3rd Cir. 2007) (finding ``incurably premature'' a petition for review of a Commission order that had been filed prior to the order's public notice date). See infra part III.B. See Lovern Petition at 4, 6-7. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.43 (stating that section 1.44(e), among other provisions, sets forth ``[g]eneral rules relating to requests for stay''); 47 C.F.R. § 1.44(e) (requiring that ``[a]ny request to stay the effectiveness of any decision or order of the Commission shall be filed as a separate pleading'' and that ``[a]ny such request which is not filed as a separate pleading will not be considered
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-43A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-43A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-43A1.txt
  • and 405, and section 1.106 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.106, that Farmers' Petition for Reconsideration IS DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), 201, 203, 206, 207, 208, 209, and 405 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 154(i), 154(j), 201, 203, 206, 207, 208, 209, and 405, and sections 1.43, 1.44(e) and 1.106 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.43, 1.44(e), and 1.106, that Farmers' Petition for Stay IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Marlene H. Dortch Secretary Petition for Reconsideration, File No. EB-07-MD-001 (filed Dec. 18, 2009) (``Petition for Reconsideration''). Qwest Commc'ns Corp. v. Farmers and Merchants Mut. Tel. Co., Second Order on Reconsideration, 24 FCC Rcd 14801 (2009)
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-167A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-167A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-167A1.txt
  • §§ 154(i), 154(j), 155(c), 548, and Section 1.115 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.115, the Application for Review filed by MSG Holdings, L.P. and Cablevision Systems Corporation IS DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to Sections 4(i), 4(j), and 628 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 154(i), 154(j), and 548, and Section 1.43 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.43, the Petition for Stay filed by MSG Holdings, L.P. and Cablevision Systems Corporation IS DISMISSED AS MOOT. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Marlene H. Dortch Secretary See MSG Holdings, L.P. and Cablevision Systems Corporation, Application for Review, File No. CSR-8185-P (filed Sept. 28, 2011) (``Application for Review''). See Verizon Tel. Cos. et al., Order,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-168A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-168A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-168A1.txt
  • §§ 154(i), 154(j), 155(c), 548, and Section 1.115 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.115, the Application for Review filed by MSG Holdings, L.P. and Cablevision Systems Corporation IS DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to Sections 4(i), 4(j), and 628 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 154(i), 154(j), and 548, and Section 1.43 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.43, the Petition for Stay filed by MSG Holdings, L.P. and Cablevision Systems Corporation IS DISMISSED AS MOOT. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Marlene H. Dortch Secretary See MSG Holdings, L.P. and Cablevision Systems Corporation, Application for Review, File No. CSR-8196-P (filed Sept. 28, 2011) (``Application for Review''). See AT&T Servs. Inc. et al., Order,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-99-88A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-99-88A1.txt
  • Act. 12. Telintar further argues that even if Section 201 authorizes Commission oversight of international settlements, it does not authorize the particular action taken by the Bureau in this case. Telintar argues that Section 201 does not confer the authority to bar a carrier from making payments for services at a rate already approved by the Commission. Because the $ 1.43 accounting rate embodied in the operating agreements of MCI, Sprint, and WorldCom had already been approved by the Commission, Telintar claims that the $1.43 rate cannot be considered unjust and unreasonable under Section 201, and the Bureau therefore did not have authority under Section 201 to order carriers to cease making payments at that rate.28 13. The Bureau Order did
• http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireline_Competition/Orders/2002/fcc02118.pdf
  • Status PR-8-01-2100 Open Orders in a Hold Status > 30 Days 0.02 0 0.01 0 0.01 0 0.01 0 0 0 PR-8-02-2100 Open Orders in a Hold Status > 90 Days 0 0 0.01 0 0.01 0 0.01 0 0 0 POTS ­ Business PR-2 - Average Completed Interval PR-2-01-2110 Average Interval Completed ­ Total No Dispatch 0.78 1.4 0.65 1.43 PR-2-03-2110 Average Interval Completed ­ Dispatch (1-5 Lines) 2.9 4.53 2.82 3.71 Federal Communications Commission FCC 02-118 B-9 Metric Metric September October November December January Notes Number Name VZ CLEC VZ CLEC VZ CLEC VZ CLEC VZ CLEC POTS ­ Residence PR-2 - Average Completed Interval PR-2-01-2120 Average Interval Completed ­ Total No Dispatch 0.71 0 0.57 0.43 a,b PR-2-03-2120
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2002/FCC-02-112A1.html
  • Press Publ'g Co v. Walling, 327 U.S. 186, 217 (1946) (rejecting petitioners' argument that agency subpoena power would subject them to impermissible inconvenience, expense, and harrassment precisely because ``they may make appropriate defense surrounded by every safeguard of judicial restraint.'') (internal quotation omitted). 51 See NAL Response at 22-26. 52 See supra n.7. 53 See supra 3. 54 47 C.F.R. 1.43, 1.44. 55 Moreover, as we discuss above, see supra 17, even after the issuance of this Forfeiture Order, SBC may choose not to pay the forfeiture and to raise a challenge to our findings in a trial de novo should the Department of Justice prosecute any collection action we may refer. 56 47 U.S.C. 408. 57 47 U.S.C. 416(c). 58
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2002/FCC-02-168A1.html
  • use of the Commission's enforcement and prosecutorial discretion. We note in this regard that the Bureau resolved numerous similar situations through similar consent decrees or through admonishments.3 ORDERING CLAUSE 3. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to Sections 4(i), 4(j), 5(c)(4), and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. 154(i), 154(j), 155(c)(4) and 503(b), and Sections 1.41, 1.43 and 1.115 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. 1.41, 1.43, 1.115, that the ``Petition for Special Relief, or in the Alternative, Application for Review'' filed by the Office of Communications of the United Church of Christ, Inc. on February 15, 2002, IS DENIED, and that the ``Request for Stay'' filed by the Office of Communications of the United Church of
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2010/FCC-10-43A1.html
  • 405, and section 1.106 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. S: 1.106, that Farmers' Petition for Reconsideration IS DENIED. 19. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), 201, 203, 206, 207, 208, 209, and 405 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. S:S: 154(i), 154(j), 201, 203, 206, 207, 208, 209, and 405, and sections 1.43, 1.44(e) and 1.106 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. S:S: 1.43, 1.44(e), and 1.106, that Farmers' Petition for Stay IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Marlene H. Dortch Secretary Petition for Reconsideration, File No. EB-07-MD-001 (filed Dec. 18, 2009) ("Petition for Reconsideration"). Qwest Commc'ns Corp. v. Farmers and Merchants Mut. Tel. Co., Second Order on Reconsideration, 24 FCC Rcd 14801 (2009)
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/conferences/combin2000/releases/98540193.pdf
  • .111 .25 The ANOVA table below provides no statistically significant relationships, but we may simply observe from the tables above that: Result 10: Bankruptcy never occurred in the additive environment and had the highest aggregate frequency in the high synergy environment. 32 Table 4.7b: ANOVA-Bankruptcies per Bidder: Superadditive Environment Variable F-statistic p-value Flexible 1.1547 0.28 Unequal 1.25 0.26 Environment (H,M,L) 1.43 0.24 CE exists 0.05 0.813 Overlap 1.17 0.32 4.8 Withdrawals and Combined Withdrawal and Bidding One bidding option available to bidders in the SMR auctions is the ability to withdraw a standing bid. This withdrawal does not come without a cost. The tables below show the average number of withdrawals per auction. Across all treatments and environments the average number
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/conferences/combin2001/papers/vsmith.pdf
  • boundary environments we tested using ten licenses (A through J). Actual parameters for these experiments also can be found at the site, http://linus.econlab.arizona.edu/FCC_Parameters In Figure 6 we see that bidder 6 had the large package and was either in the winning set or not with package F,G (own effect). The Gain was either lowest at 1.23 (430/350) or highest at 1.43 (430/301). In Figure 7 we divided the licenses into two groups with various own and gain effects. For licenses A-E we had several bidders with values for the entire license group from A to E, while some of them had values for packages that were part of the optimal allocation set. In the second group of licenses F-J, each bidder
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/rss/index.htm?job=ainf&id=62
  • Auction No. 62 will offer 171 construction permits in the FM Broadcast service for stations throughout the United States and the U.S. Virgin Islands. Qualified Bidders: 214 Rounds Completed: 55 Bidding Days: 12 Results for Round 55 Gross Revenue: $70,119,000.00 - Dollar Change: -687000.00 - % Change: - 0.97 Net Revenue: $54,211,400.00 - Dollar Change: -788200.00 - % Change: - 1.43 New Bids: 6 Withdrawn Bids: 1 Proactive Waivers: 0 Bidders that Reduced Eligibility: 3 Permits with PWBs*: 165 FCC Held Permits: 6 Eligible Bidders: 98 (of 214 qualified bidders) * PWBs = Provisionally Winning Bidders http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/default.htm?job=auction_summary&id=62M on, 30 Jan 2006 03:05:06 EST Summary Permits: Auction No. 62 will offer 171 construction permits in the FM Broadcast service for stations throughout
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/rss/index.htm?job=ainf&id=65
  • commercial licenses in the 800 MHz band in the three alternative band configurations. Licenses in only one of these mutually incompatible band configurations will be awarded. Qualified Bidders: 9 Rounds Completed: 59 Bidding Days: 9 Results for Round 59 Gross Revenue: $32,945,000.00 - Dollar Change: 77000.00 - % Change: 0.23 Net Revenue: $32,945,000.00 - Dollar Change: 464250.00 - % Change: 1.43 New Bids: 1 Withdrawn Bids: 0 Proactive Waivers: 0 Bidders that Reduced Eligibility: 0 Licenses with PWBs*: 2 FCC Held Licenses: 0 Eligible Bidders: 3 (of 9 qualified bidders) * PWBs = Provisionally Winning Bidders http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/default.htm?job=auction_summary&id=65W ed, 24 May 2006 14:15:01 GMT Summary Licenses: Auction No. 65 will offer nationwide commercial licenses in the 800 MHz band in the three
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/fcc01130.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/fcc01130.txt
  • under the revised measure recently approved by the New York Commission, and then excluding those I-codes that could have been discovered by a properly conducted acceptance test, Verizon shows that the gap between competitive LECs and retail I-code rate in September and November 2000 is eliminated and reduced to less than one percent in October 2000. The adjusted rate is 1.43 percent for September 2000, 4.04 percent for October 2000 and 1.94 percent for November 2000 compared to the weighted average during this period of 2.36 percent for competitive LECs and 3.30 percent for Verizon. See Verizon Massachusetts II Lacouture/Ruesterholz Decl. at para. 96 and Attach. AA. See Rhythms Massachusetts II Williams Decl. para. 26; Covad Clancy Decl. para. 10-23; see
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2002/fcc02331.pdf
  • (days) 12.69 4.67 12.49 6.00 12.94 12.73 0.67 8.10 0.33 1,2,4,5 A.2.1.4.1.2PBX/<10 circuits/Non-Dispatch/FL (days) 5.49 4.79 6.50 2.87 4.52 1.17 1.90 1.05 3.30 1.17 2,4,5 A.2.1.4.2.1PBX/>=10 circuits/Dispatch/FL (days) 70.50 68.60 4.00 12.42 15.93 A.2.1.4.2.2PBX/>=10 circuits/Non-Dispatch/FL (days) 3.51 5.50 8.97 1.28 9.00 5.89 4.50 6.68 1.56 1,3,4,5 A.2.1.5.1.1Centrex/<10 circuits/Dispatch/FL (days) 6.56 1.00 7.24 8.15 6.51 6.03 1 A.2.1.5.1.2Centrex/<10 circuits/Non- Dispatch/FL (days) 1.43 3.04 2.18 1.55 4.18 0.89 5.83 2.00 3.72 5.00 1,3,4,5 A.2.1.5.2.1Centrex/>=10 circuits/Dispatch/FL (days) 9.70 14.78 13.32 11.32 10.54 A.2.1.5.2.2Centrex/>=10 circuits/Non- Dispatch/FL (days) 3.94 1.17 4.08 0.94 2.71 2.30 3.57 1.42 1,5 A.2.1.6.1.1ISDN/<10 circuits/Dispatch/FL (days)22.03 11.80 17.78 8.33 21.29 10.00 5.68 11.51 12.00 1,2,3,5 B - 7 Metric Metric Name [SQM Number] May June July August September Number and Disaggregation BST
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ldrpt101.pdf
  • 2.51 1972 0.24 0.97 1938 0.21 2.53 1973 0.25 0.95 1939 0.22 2.59 1974 0.26 0.87 1940 0.21 2.50 1975 0.27 0.85 1941 0.21 2.35 1976 0.29 0.83 1942 0.22 2.21 1977 0.28 0.78 1943 0.21 2.03 1978 0.29 0.73 1944 0.22 2.04 1979 0.29 0.67 1945 0.21 1.96 1980 0.30 0.61 1946 0.20 1.69 1981 0.33 0.60 1947 0.19 1.43 1982 0.34 0.59 1948 0.19 1.29 1983 0.35 0.58 1949 0.19 1.32 1984 0.32 0.52 1950 0.19 1.33 1985 0.31 0.48 1951 0.20 1.29 1986 0.28 0.43 1952 0.20 1.27 1987 0.25 0.36 1953 0.21 1.30 1988 0.23 0.33 1954 0.22 1.38 1989 0.22 0.29 1955 0.23 1.43 1990 0.20 0.26 1956 0.23 1.43 1991 0.20 0.24 1957 0.24 1.41
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref02.pdf
  • 1.80 1.71 1.45 2.08 1.98 2.05 2.19 2.09 2.13 2.31 2.14 2.25 2.38 2.32 2.30 2.44 2.40 2.36 2.65 2.59 2.56 1986 1.05 0.99 0.98 1.35 1.29 1.28 1.54 1.48 1.46 1.77 1.70 1.68 1.88 1.80 1.79 1.99 1.91 1.90 2.06 2.03 2.02 2.12 2.09 2.08 2.27 2.24 2.23 1987 0.91 0.86 0.90 1.17 1.10 1.16 1.29 1.25 1.28 1.47 1.43 1.45 1.58 1.44 1.56 1.70 1.45 1.68 1.82 1.80 1.81 1.83 1.81 1.82 1.90 1.89 1.89 1988 0.98 0.86 0.90 1.19 1.08 1.15 1.32 1.24 1.28 1.44 1.37 1.40 1.56 1.44 1.56 1.62 1.44 1.63 1.76 1.75 1.77 1.76 1.77 1.78 1.84 1.85 1.86 1989 1.14 1.12 1.12 1.34 1.31 1.32 1.48 0.92 1.45 1.48 1.45 1.45 1.54 1.45 1.45
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref03.pdf
  • 1.44 1.32 1.80 1.71 1.45 2.08 1.98 2.05 2.19 2.09 2.13 2.31 2.14 2.25 2.38 2.32 2.30 2.44 2.40 2.36 2.65 2.59 2.56 19861.05 0.99 0.98 1.35 1.29 1.28 1.54 1.48 1.46 1.77 1.70 1.68 1.88 1.80 1.79 1.99 1.91 1.90 2.06 2.03 2.02 2.12 2.09 2.08 2.27 2.24 2.23 19870.91 0.86 0.90 1.17 1.10 1.16 1.29 1.25 1.28 1.47 1.43 1.45 1.58 1.44 1.56 1.70 1.45 1.68 1.82 1.80 1.81 1.83 1.81 1.82 1.90 1.89 1.89 19880.98 0.86 0.90 1.19 1.08 1.15 1.32 1.24 1.28 1.44 1.37 1.40 1.56 1.44 1.56 1.62 1.44 1.63 1.76 1.75 1.77 1.76 1.77 1.78 1.84 1.85 1.86 19891.14 1.12 1.12 1.34 1.31 1.32 1.48 0.92 1.45 1.48 1.45 1.45 1.54 1.45 1.45 1.54 1.52
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref04.pdf
  • 1,227 2000 575 705 860 1,004 1,305 2001 558 727 906 1,054 1,343 2002 584 741 928 1,150 1,433 1980 2.61% 2.32% 2.18% 1.81% 1.51% 1981 2.96 2.52 2.24 1.95 1.55 1982 3.18 2.66 2.19 1.97 1.52 1983 3.13 2.82 2.24 2.02 1.55 1984 2.71 2.44 2.21 1.82 1.51 1985 2.72 2.41 2.20 1.81 1.39 1986 2.94 2.62 2.15 1.83 1.43 1987 3.24 2.57 2.31 1.85 1.44 1988 3.23 2.61 2.31 1.82 1.49 1989 3.05 2.61 2.30 1.88 1.43 1990 3.11 2.77 2.37 1.89 1.48 1991 3.08 2.80 2.28 1.84 1.45 1992 3.35 2.77 2.34 1.88 1.46 1993 3.27 2.70 2.45 1.96 1.53 1994 3.17 2.83 2.36 1.95 1.58 1995 3.38 2.71 2.41 1.99 1.55 1996 3.20 2.94 2.46 2.05 1.57
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref05.pdf
  • 1,305 2001 558 727 906 1,054 1,343 2002 584 741 928 1,150 1,433 2003 564 768 932 1,142 1,441 1980 2.61% 2.32% 2.18% 1.81% 1.51% 1981 2.96 2.52 2.24 1.95 1.55 1982 3.18 2.66 2.19 1.97 1.52 1983 3.13 2.82 2.24 2.02 1.55 1984 2.71 2.44 2.21 1.82 1.51 1985 2.72 2.41 2.20 1.81 1.39 1986 2.94 2.62 2.15 1.83 1.43 1987 3.24 2.57 2.31 1.85 1.44 1988 3.23 2.61 2.31 1.82 1.49 1989 3.05 2.61 2.30 1.88 1.43 1990 3.11 2.77 2.37 1.89 1.48 1991 3.08 2.80 2.28 1.84 1.45 1992 3.35 2.77 2.34 1.88 1.46 1993 3.27 2.70 2.45 1.96 1.53 1994 3.17 2.83 2.36 1.95 1.58 1995 3.38 2.71 2.41 1.99 1.55 1996 3.20 2.94 2.46 2.05 1.57
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/strev-95.pdf
  • is to take into account that revenue is not allocated to Alaska, Micronesia, and Puerto Rico -7 Table 1 Total Billed Revenue Interstate Instrastate Intrastate+Interstate Percent of Total (millions) (millions) (millions) ALABAMA $1,161 $1,606 $2,767 1.39 ARIZONA 1,566 1,343 2,909 1.46 ARKANSAS 694 854 1,548 0.78 CALIFORNIA 8,040 14,810 22,850 11.48 COLORADO 1,621 1,594 3,214 1.62 CONNECTICUT 1,414 1,429 2,843 1.43 DELAWARE 301 200 501 0.25 DC 513 409 922 0.46 FLORIDA 5,214 6,635 11,849 5.95 GEORGIA 2,709 3,087 5,796 2.91 HAWAII 373 432 805 0.40 IDAHO 437 363 800 0.40 ILLINOIS 3,507 4,668 8,175 4.11 INDIANA 1,550 2,353 3,903 1.96 IOWA 827 1,089 1,917 0.96 KANSAS 821 1,036 1,857 0.93 KENTUCKY 1,188 1,540 2,729 1.37 LOUISIANA 1,129 1,680 2,809 1.41
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/strev-96.pdf
  • 1.39 0.97 0.42 1.14 0.25 (0.17) HAWAII 0.14 0.92 (0.79) 0.93 (0.80) (0.01) IDAHO 3.72 1.01 2.71 1.24 2.48 (0.23) ILLINOIS 0.25 0.95 (0.70) 0.86 (0.61) 0.09 INDIANA 0.42 0.93 (0.51) 0.86 (0.44) 0.07 IOWA 1.74 0.96 0.79 0.99 0.75 (0.04) KANSAS 3.15 0.96 2.18 1.00 2.15 (0.04) KENTUCKY 1.08 0.94 0.14 1.09 (0.01) (0.15) LOUISIANA 2.34 0.94 1.40 0.91 1.43 0.03 MAINE 2.09 0.95 1.14 0.98 1.11 (0.03) MARYLAND 0.02 0.97 (0.95) 1.05 (1.03) (0.08) MASSACHUSETTS 0.15 0.99 (0.85) 0.97 (0.82) 0.02 MICHIGAN 0.49 0.90 (0.41) 0.71 (0.22) 0.18 MINNESOTA 1.25 0.94 0.31 0.94 0.30 (0.01) MISSISSIPPI 1.83 0.98 0.85 1.02 0.82 (0.04) MISSOURI 1.32 0.95 0.37 0.92 0.41 0.03 MONTANA 7.53 0.96 6.56 1.19 6.34 (0.22) NEBRASKA 1.77 0.97
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/strev-97.pdf
  • 910 47,296 (46,386) 0.02 1.13 (1.11) MASSACHUSETTS 12,015 59,637 (47,621) 0.22 1.11 (0.89) MICHIGAN 41,458 59,843 (18,385) 0.55 0.80 (0.24) MINNESOTA 41,770 37,072 4,698 1.21 1.07 0.14 MISSISSIPPI 28,343 17,587 10,756 1.79 1.11 0.68 MISSOURI 50,202 40,337 9,864 1.26 1.01 0.25 MONTANA 43,780 7,994 35,786 7.18 1.31 5.87 NEBRASKA 20,831 13,319 7,513 1.74 1.11 0.63 NEVADA 9,134 20,711 (11,577) 0.63 1.43 (0.80) NEW HAMPSHIRE 9,067 14,531 (5,463) 0.92 1.48 (0.56) NEW JERSEY 3,408 94,549 (91,141) 0.05 1.27 (1.22) NEW MEXICO 37,035 14,865 22,170 3.42 1.37 2.05 NEW YORK 96,991 156,709 (59,718) 0.64 1.03 (0.39) NORTH CAROLINA 42,608 60,579 (17,971) 0.76 1.08 (0.32) NORTH DAKOTA 22,292 6,012 16,281 4.62 1.25 3.38 OHIO 19,641 72,641 (53,000) 0.24 0.90 (0.66) OKLAHOMA 59,151 24,027 35,124
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/strev-99.pdf
  • Wisconsin 26.63 4.44 14.54 23.43 2.17 0.67 71.88 20.04 91.92 Wyoming 32.00 5.72 10.46 43.26 0.97 1.32 93.73 19.62 113.36 United States 28.59 4.71 13.33 28.19 1.93 0.75 77.51 19.65 97.15 Guam NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 86.85 N. Mariana Islands NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 90.96 Puerto Rico 28.67 3.58 14.76 21.10 0.68 1.43 70.22 33.81 104.02 Virgin Islands NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 118.76 Grand Total $28.59 $4.71 $13.34 $28.14 $1.92 $0.75 $77.45 $19.74 $97.20 NA - Not Applicable. Table 5 Note: Figures may not add due to rounding. Average revenues include both residential and business users. SLCs Other Wireline Programs High-Cost Loop Support (HCL) $872,481 Long-Term Support (LTS) 479,134
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend200.pdf
  • Telecom 1.66 0.00 0.84 0.22 3.96 252 516 770 Qwest 0.00 0.00 0.49 0.19 1.41 21,588 40,107 62,239 SBC 0.00 0.00 0.50 0.21 1.46 63,313 86,767 152,856 Sprint 0.30 0.00 0.70 0.18 2.12 9,467 14,759 24,349 Verizon 0.35 0.00 0.48 0.21 1.79 61,426 127,515 190,453 All Price Caps 0.16 0.00 0.49 0.22 1.63 188,412 328,724 521,451 NECA 1.00 1.39 1.59 1.43 8.62 14,074 16,181 15,903 All Price Caps and NECA 0.23¢ 0.07¢ 0.52¢ 0.26¢ 1.91¢ 202,487 344,905 537,355 Source: Access tariff filings. Switched Traffic Sensitive Per Carrier Common Line per Terminating Switched Non-Traffic Sensitive Per Total Charge per Conversation Minute 3/ 2/ Non-traffic sensitive charges include charges assessed on a per-month, per-unit basis. Prior to 07/01/94 these charges were included in
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend298.pdf
  • 0.47 1,013 0.46 8.3 FLORIDA 11,994 6.02 13,488 6.07 12.5 GEORGIA 5,869 2.95 6,651 2.99 13.3 HAWAII 815 0.41 887 0.40 8.9 IDAHO 811 0.41 932 0.42 14.9 ILLINOIS 8,272 4.15 9,343 4.20 12.9 INDIANA 3,948 1.98 4,359 1.96 10.4 IOWA 1,939 0.97 2,104 0.95 8.5 KANSAS 1,879 0.94 2,083 0.94 10.9 KENTUCKY 2,761 1.39 3,044 1.37 10.3 LOUISIANA 2,842 1.43 3,108 1.40 9.4 MAINE 896 0.45 1,009 0.45 12.7 MARYLAND 3,918 1.97 4,422 1.99 12.9 MASSACHUSETTS 5,190 2.61 5,711 2.57 10.0 MICHIGAN 6,652 3.34 7,511 3.38 12.9 MINNESOTA 3,180 1.60 3,592 1.62 13.0 MISSISSIPPI 1,665 0.84 1,827 0.82 9.7 MISSOURI 3,838 1.93 4,246 1.91 10.6 MONTANA 654 0.33 724 0.33 10.8 NEBRASKA 1,353 0.68 1,495 0.67 10.5 NEVADA 1,157 0.58
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend502.pdf
  • Iowa Telecom 0.81 0.00 0.84 0.15 2.90 134 185 331 Qwest 0.00 0.00 0.54 0.18 1.47 21,018 39,686 61,107 SBC 0.00 0.00 0.43 0.21 1.30 64,610 92,623 158,985 Sprint 0.03 0.00 0.63 0.17 1.68 10,375 15,681 26,235 Verizon 0.20 0.00 0.44 0.21 1.54 58,300 131,143 190,087 Price Caps 0.07 0.00 0.45 0.21 1.42 186,646 342,940 530,987 NECA 1.00 1.50 1.12 1.43 7.75 16,085 17,824 17,354 All Price Caps and NECA 0.15¢ 0.07¢ 0.47¢ 0.24¢ 1.69¢ 202,731 360,764 548,341 Source: Access tariff filings. 1/ This table shows average rates (weighted by minutes of use) for all local exchange carriers (LECs) that file access tariffs subject to price-cap regulation and all LECs in the National Exchange Carrier Association (NECA) pool. Rates are composites
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend504.pdf
  • 1,023 2,316 4,506 7,567 12,073 4.13 Indiana 1,488 2,829 4,318 592 475 1,067 2,080 3,304 5,385 1.84 Iowa 713 1,284 1,996 315 218 533 1,027 1,502 2,529 0.87 Kansas 699 1,262 1,961 329 182 511 1,029 1,443 2,472 0.85 Kentucky 877 1,813 2,689 353 235 588 1,230 2,048 3,278 1.12 Louisiana 1,045 2,388 3,434 428 330 758 1,473 2,719 4,192 1.43 Maine 374 715 1,089 178 99 276 551 813 1,365 0.47 Maryland 1,798 3,029 4,827 729 461 1,190 2,526 3,490 6,016 2.06 Massachusetts 1,942 3,703 5,644 885 536 1,421 2,827 4,239 7,066 2.42 Michigan 2,344 5,486 7,830 942 987 1,929 3,286 6,473 9,759 3.34 Minnesota 1,297 2,463 3,760 590 394 984 1,887 2,857 4,743 1.62 Mississippi 642 1,484 2,125 280
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend605.pdf
  • 1987 113.6 0.25 0.40 0.99 0.22 1948 24.1 0.19 1.42 1988 118.3 0.23 0.36 1.02 0.21 1949 23.8 0.19 1.46 1989 124.0 0.22 0.32 1.02 0.19 1950 24.1 0.19 1.47 1990 130.7 0.20 0.28 1.00 0.17 1951 26.0 0.20 1.42 1991 136.2 0.20 0.27 1.02 0.15 1952 26.5 0.20 1.41 1992 140.3 0.19 0.25 1.01 0.15 $0.09 1953 26.7 0.21 1.43 1993 144.5 0.19 0.25 1.02 0.15 0.09 1954 26.9 0.22 1.52 1994 148.2 0.18 0.22 0.93 0.14 0.08 1955 26.8 0.23 1.58 1995 152.4 0.17 0.20 0.91 0.12 0.07 1956 27.2 0.23 1.58 1996 156.9 0.16 0.19 0.76 0.12 0.08 1957 28.1 0.24 1.56 1997 160.5 0.15 0.17 0.69 0.11 0.06 1958 28.9 0.24 1.52 1998 163.0 0.14 0.16 0.58
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend801.pdf
  • Iowa Telecom 0.81 0.00 0.84 0.15 2.90 134 185 331 Qwest 0.00 0.00 0.54 0.18 1.47 21,018 39,686 61,107 SBC 0.00 0.00 0.43 0.21 1.30 64,610 92,623 158,985 Sprint 0.03 0.00 0.63 0.17 1.68 10,375 15,681 26,235 Verizon 0.20 0.00 0.44 0.21 1.54 58,300 131,143 190,087 Price Caps 0.07 0.00 0.45 0.21 1.42 186,646 342,940 530,987 NECA 1.00 1.40 1.59 1.43 8.62 16,085 17,824 17,354 All Price Caps and NECA 0.15¢ 0.07¢ 0.48¢ 0.24¢ 1.71¢ 202,731 360,764 548,341 Source: Access tariff filings. 2/ Non-traffic sensitive charges include charges assessed on a per-month, per-unit basis. Prior to 07/01/94 these charges were included in the average traffic- sensitive rates. 3/ The total charge per conversation minute consists of charges on the originating end
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Intl/itrnd00.pdf
  • 1.04 0.99 0.91 0.81 0.62 0.63 0.50 0.35 Germany 15/ 1.06 1.08 1.12 1.08 1.05 0.95 0.88 0.65 0.50 0.40 0.37 Greece 1.09 1.12 1.17 1.17 1.14 1.07 1.10 0.99 0.97 0.80 0.61 Guatemala 1.05 1.08 1.11 1.18 1.19 1.15 1.17 1.07 1.00 0.83 0.67 Haiti 1.06 1.13 1.15 1.21 1.22 1.23 1.18 0.99 0.81 0.72 0.57 Hong Kong 1.40 1.43 1.48 1.46 1.37 1.08 0.90 0.59 0.47 0.35 0.54 India 2.37 2.15 2.16 2.13 1.88 1.56 1.38 1.01 0.96 0.81 0.66 Israel 1.36 1.32 1.35 1.34 1.25 1.10 1.16 0.98 1.01 0.79 0.47 Italy 1.07 1.05 1.08 1.08 1.05 1.02 1.00 0.79 0.74 0.70 0.59 Jamaica 1.00 1.08 1.06 1.06 1.05 1.05 1.03 0.91 0.80 0.74 0.64 Japan 1.39 1.34
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr03-1.pdf
  • New York 33,258,503 6.19 3,221 4,185 North Carolina 15,964,159 2.97 1,546 2,009 North Dakota 1,297,853 0.24 126 163 N. Mariana Islands NA NA NA NA Ohio 17,769,415 3.31 1,721 2,236 Oklahoma 6,074,800 1.13 588 764 Oregon 7,310,642 1.36 708 920 Pennsylvania 21,571,110 4.01 2,089 2,714 Puerto Rico 2,316,291 0.43 224 291 Rhode Island 2,242,130 0.42 217 282 South Carolina 7,699,566 1.43 746 969 South Dakota 1,450,334 0.27 140 182 Tennessee 9,849,738 1.83 954 1,239 Texas 31,136,507 5.79 3,015 3,918 Utah 4,056,676 0.75 393 510 Vermont 1,694,761 0.32 164 213 Virginia 17,327,110 3.22 1,678 2,180 Virgin Islands NA NA NA NA Washington 12,036,704 2.24 1,166 1,514 West Virginia 3,483,338 0.65 337 438 Wisconsin 8,692,673 1.62 842 1,094 Wyoming 1,320,180 0.25 128 166
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr03-2.pdf
  • 0.10 0.06 3.73 Arkansas 0.61 0.00 0.07 0.00 0.01 0.69 California 12.51 0.00 0.79 0.00 0.11 13.41 Colorado 1.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.01 1.11 Connecticut 2.23 0.00 0.05 0.00 0.00 2.28 Delaware 0.38 0.00 0.03 0.00 0.00 0.41 District of Columbia 1.32 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.32 Florida 1.34 0.00 0.03 0.00 0.00 1.37 Georgia 1.41 0.00 0.02 0.00 0.01 1.43 Guam 4.32 0.00 0.33 0.00 0.02 4.67 Hawaii 1.70 0.00 0.19 0.00 0.00 1.89 Idaho 3.94 0.02 0.02 0.00 0.04 4.02 Illinois 0.96 0.00 0.12 0.00 0.01 1.09 Indiana 0.94 0.00 0.13 0.00 0.00 1.08 Iowa 0.90 0.00 0.02 0.00 0.01 0.94 Kansas 0.86 0.00 0.04 0.00 0.00 0.90 Kentucky 2.40 0.00 0.07 0.00 0.02 2.49 Louisiana 0.71 0.00 0.01
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr03-3.pdf
  • 0.00 663800 C GUAM TELEPHONE AUTHORITY -9.34 0.00 -9.34 0.00 TOTAL: HAWAII 10.84 -0.31 11.19 217.38 623021 C SANDWICH ISLES COMMUNICATIONS, INC. 197.57 61.47 84.29 217.38 623100 C VERIZON HAWAII INC.-HI 9.41 -0.36 9.80 0.00 TOTAL: IDAHO 2.95 -0.88 3.87 3.72 472213 C ALBION TEL. CO. D/B/A ATC COMMUNICATIONS 8.92 1.27 7.56 13.04 472215 C CAMBRIDGE TEL. CO.,INC.-ID -2.36 -3.74 1.43 -6.19 472218 C CUSTER TEL. COOPERATIVE INC. 13.62 -0.27 13.93 23.19 472220 C FILER MUTUAL TELEPHONE COMPANY - ID 29.69 -6.74 39.06 INFINITE 472221 A>CFARMERS MUTUAL TEL CO LTD. - ID -34.59 -0.55 -34.22 0.00 472222 C FREMONT TELCOM CO. 4.97 -2.76 7.95 7.81 472223 C CENTURYTEL OF THE GEM STATE - ID -5.64 -2.01 -3.70 -9.78 472225 C CENTURYTEL
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr03-3.pdf
  • 331159CENTURYTEL-CENTRL WI 0.00 0.00 0.00 115.55 312.90 335220WISCONSIN BELL 180.89 188.67 175.95 180.33 180.54 TOTAL:WYOMING 461.27 474.87 457.54 442.24 432.08 511595UTC OF THE WEST-WY 417.02 482.34 501.18 487.92 491.87 512251RANGE TEL COOP - WY 671.52 639.49 653.15 666.11 662.43 512289CHUGWATER TEL CO 490.59 518.57 457.53 520.63 514.83 512290ALL WEST COMM.-WY 354.04 399.12 371.10 463.19 490.57 512291DUBOIS TEL EXCHANGE 1,071.57 1,026.60 1,001.43 966.09 904.43 512295SILVER STAR TEL-WY 781.25 687.05 724.30 652.54 719.95 512296TRI COUNTY TEL ASSN 894.82 952.00 1,035.03 1,050.05 1,163.83 512297UNION TELEPHONE CO 480.00 513.56 503.03 534.05 568.58 512299CENTURYTEL OF WY. 356.79 395.09 391.50 407.09 384.69 515108QWEST CORP-WY 427.92 442.50 418.52 399.46 384.24 TOTAL:INDUSTRY 245.55 239.52 239.85 242.44 252.32 3 - 287 Study Area CodeStudy Area Name 1999 2000 2001 2002
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr04-1.pdf
  • 1,025 2,325 4,520 7,597 12,117 4.14 Indiana 1,488 2,829 4,318 596 475 1,071 2,084 3,305 5,389 1.84 Iowa 718 1,299 2,017 315 219 534 1,033 1,518 2,551 0.87 Kansas 701 1,267 1,968 331 182 513 1,032 1,449 2,481 0.85 Kentucky 885 1,831 2,716 351 236 587 1,236 2,067 3,303 1.13 Louisiana 1,045 2,383 3,427 430 330 760 1,475 2,713 4,187 1.43 Maine 375 715 1,090 178 99 276 553 814 1,366 0.47 Maryland 1,799 3,041 4,841 735 462 1,197 2,534 3,503 6,037 2.07 Massachusetts 1,949 3,746 5,695 894 539 1,433 2,843 4,285 7,128 2.44 Michigan 2,294 5,246 7,540 944 971 1,915 3,238 6,217 9,455 3.23 Minnesota 1,304 2,485 3,789 591 395 986 1,895 2,880 4,776 1.63 Mississippi 641 1,476 2,117 281
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr04-3.pdf
  • 0.56 -2.93 401720 C CENTURYTEL OF REDFIELD, INC. 4.19 -6.81 11.80 13.54 401721 C RICE BELT TEL. CO.,INC. -11.72 -1.50 -10.38 -32.66 401722 A E. RITTER TELEPHONE COMPANY 4.90 -4.53 9.88 30.23 401724 C SOUTHWEST ARKANSAS TEL. COOP. INC. -0.43 1.18 -1.59 -6.00 401726 C TRI-COUNTY TEL. CO. INC.-AR -10.48 -2.97 -7.74 -18.69 401727 C CENTURYTEL OF SOUTH ARKANSAS, INC. 1.43 2.20 -0.75 -1.50 401729 C WALNUT HILL TELEPHONE COMPANY -1.17 0.82 -1.97 -3.94 401733 C YELCOT TEL. CO.,INC. -3.46 0.07 -3.53 -16.69 401734 C YELL COUNTY TELEPHONE COMPANY 3.50 -0.50 4.02 3.21 403031 C SCOTT COUNTY TELEPHONE COMPANY -5.37 9.09 -13.26 -9.58 405211 C SOUTHWESTERN BELL-ARKANSAS -17.32 -4.90 -13.06 0.00 CALIFORNIA Total -4.13 -3.00 -1.16 7.62 542301 C CALAVERAS TELEPHONE
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr04-3.pdf
  • 331159CENTURYTEL-CENTRL WI 0.00 0.00 124.18 314.67 349.44 335220WISCONSIN BELL 188.67 175.95 180.33 181.39 178.22 WYOMING Total 474.87 457.61 442.34 432.35 444.90 511595UTC OF THE WEST-WY 482.34 501.18 487.92 491.87 527.82 512251RANGE TEL COOP - WY 639.49 654.20 667.69 655.11 642.51 512289CHUGWATER TEL CO 518.57 457.53 520.63 514.83 539.28 512290ALL WEST COMM.-WY 399.12 371.10 463.19 490.57 374.12 512291DUBOIS TEL EXCHANGE 1,026.60 1,001.43 966.09 904.44 893.72 512295SILVER STAR TEL-WY 687.05 724.30 652.54 719.95 786.88 512296TRI COUNTY TEL ASSN 952.00 1,035.03 1,050.05 1,164.21 1,213.19 512297UNION TELEPHONE CO 513.56 503.03 534.05 604.32 568.32 512299CENTURYTEL OF WY. 395.09 391.50 407.09 384.56 428.87 515108QWEST CORP-WY 442.50 418.52 399.46 384.24 395.81 INDUSTRY Total 239.52 239.85 242.56 252.75 256.59 Source: National Exchange Carrier Association 3 - 277 Study Area
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrs00-0.pdf
  • Telecom 1.66 0.00 0.84 0.22 3.96 252 516 770 Qwest 0.00 0.00 0.49 0.19 1.41 21,588 40,107 62,239 SBC 0.00 0.00 0.50 0.21 1.46 63,313 86,767 152,856 Sprint 0.30 0.00 0.70 0.18 2.12 9,467 14,759 24,349 Verizon 0.35 0.00 0.48 0.21 1.79 61,426 127,515 190,453 All Price Caps 0.16 0.00 0.49 0.22 1.63 188,412 328,724 521,451 NECA 1.00 1.39 1.59 1.43 8.62 14,074 16,181 15,903 All Price Caps And NECA 0.23¢ 0.07¢ 0.52¢ 0.26¢ 1.91¢ 202,487 344,905 537,355 Source: Access tariff filings. Switched Traffic Sensitive per Carrier Common Line per Terminating Switched Non-Traffic Sensitive per Total Charge per Conversation Minute*** ** Non-traffic sensitive charges include charges assessed on a per-month per-unit basis. Prior to 07/01/94 these charges were included in the
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrs01-0.pdf
  • 0.63 -1.85 -92.81 351148 A DEEP RIVER MUT. TEL. CO. Merged with 351248MONTEZUMA MUTUAL TEL. CO. 351149 A DEFIANCE TEL. CO. 16.81 3.18 13.21 80.95 351150 A DIXON TEL. CO. 12.02 4.53 7.16 60.42 351152 A DUMONT TEL. CO. 8.63 3.42 5.04 44.10 351153 A DUNKERTON TEL. COOP., INC. 9.21 3.47 5.55 48.32 351156 A EAST BUCHANAN TEL. COOP. 11.64 1.43 10.07 71.74 351157 A ELLSWORTH COOP. TEL. ASSN. 18.45 5.76 12.00 81.41 351158 C MINBURN TELECOMM. (351341 FRONTIER-SCHUYLER) -2.67 4.49 -6.85 0.00 351160 A FARMERS & BUSINESSMEN'S TEL. CO. 11.83 2.40 9.21 69.81 351162 A FARMERS COOP. TEL. CO.-DYSART 6.87 -0.42 7.32 58.74 351166 A FARMERS & MERCHANTS MUTUAL TEL. CO. 5.91 1.67 4.18 35.42 351168 A FARMERS MUTUAL COOP
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrs02-0.pdf
  • -2,580 -0.30 Idaho 18,772 0 18,772 2.03 4,973 0.54 13,799 1.49 Illinois 8,157 0 8,157 0.08 42,635 0.43 -34,478 -0.35 Indiana 4,366 0 4,366 0.10 17,843 0.40 -13,477 -0.30 Iowa 5,684 0 5,684 0.27 8,559 0.41 -2,876 -0.14 Kansas 48,929 0 48,929 2.35 9,098 0.44 39,830 1.92 Kentucky 8,032 0 8,032 0.30 11,903 0.45 -3,870 -0.14 Louisiana 44,796 0 44,796 1.43 12,708 0.41 32,089 1.02 Maine 7,748 0 7,748 0.74 4,522 0.43 3,226 0.31 Maryland 0 0 0 0.00 21,781 0.46 -21,781 -0.46 Massachusetts 50 0 50 0.00 26,427 0.49 -26,377 -0.49 Michigan 22,805 0 22,805 0.29 27,361 0.35 -4,556 -0.06 Minnesota 17,720 0 17,720 0.46 16,892 0.44 828 0.02 Mississippi 16,558 0 16,558 0.95 8,025 0.46 8,533 0.49 Missouri 41,249
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrs02-0.pdf
  • WI 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 110.80 335220WISCONSIN BELL 184.03 180.89 188.67 175.95 164.01 TOTAL:WYOMING 431.73 461.27 474.87 457.54 440.04 511595UTC OF THE WEST-WY 421.47 417.02 482.34 501.18 487.92 512251RANGE TEL COOP - WY 572.86 671.52 639.49 653.15 654.56 512289CHUGWATER TEL CO 492.21 490.59 518.57 457.53 520.63 512290ALL WEST COMM.-WY 276.87 354.04 399.12 371.10 463.19 512291DUBOIS TEL EXCHANGE 968.87 1,071.57 1,026.60 1,001.43 966.09 512295SILVER STAR TEL-WY 701.45 781.25 687.05 724.30 655.77 512296TRI COUNTY TEL ASSN 721.52 894.82 952.00 1,035.03 1,009.65 512297UNION TELEPHONE CO 503.52 480.00 513.56 503.03 502.84 512299CENTURYTEL OF WY. 372.78 356.79 395.09 391.50 402.62 515108QWEST CORP-WY 405.42 427.92 442.50 418.52 399.46 TOTAL:INDUSTRY 247.37 245.55 239.48 239.81 240.13 3 - 289 Study Area CodeStudy Area Name 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/SOCC/00socc.pdf
  • 1.60 1.55 1.50 1.40 1.30 1.25 1.00 0.80 0.65 0.55 0.38 Dominican Republic 10/ 1.45 1.42 1.39 1.36 1.29 1.30 1.10 0.90 0.70 0.60 0.38 0.38 0.38 Egypt 1.95 1.90 1.80 1.70 1.60 1.50 1.40 1.40 1.30 1.30 1.10 0.70 0.46 El Salvador 1.50 1.50 1.40 1.30 1.25 1.20 1.20 1.10 0.88 0.77 0.60 0.48 0.38 France 10/ 1.58 1.71 1.43 0.96 0.97 0.62 0.54 0.35 0.26 0.21 0.21 0.19 0.19 Germany 1.58 1.71 1.43 1.10 0.83 0.51 0.39 0.23 0.20 0.21 0.21 0.19 0.19 Greece 2.15 2.32 2.19 1.66 1.55 1.41 1.26 1.01 0.86 0.55 0.30 0.26 0.25 Guatemala 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.40 1.30 1.20 1.18 1.00 0.90 0.77 0.64 0.51 0.38 Haiti 1.45 1.45 1.40 1.35 1.30 1.25 1.20
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/SOCC/01socc.pdf
  • 1.60 1.55 1.50 1.40 1.30 1.25 1.00 0.80 0.65 0.55 0.38 0.38 Dominican Republic 10/ 1.42 1.39 1.36 1.29 1.30 1.10 0.90 0.70 0.60 0.38 0.38 0.38 0.38 Egypt 1.90 1.80 1.70 1.60 1.50 1.40 1.40 1.30 1.30 1.10 0.70 0.46 0.46 El Salvador 1.50 1.40 1.30 1.25 1.20 1.20 1.10 0.88 0.77 0.60 0.48 0.38 0.38 France 10/ 1.71 1.43 0.96 0.97 0.62 0.54 0.35 0.26 0.21 0.21 0.19 0.19 0.19 Germany 1.71 1.43 1.10 0.83 0.51 0.39 0.23 0.20 0.21 0.21 0.19 0.19 0.19 Greece 2.32 2.19 1.66 1.55 1.41 1.26 1.01 0.86 0.55 0.30 0.25 0.26 0.25 Guatemala 1.50 1.50 1.40 1.30 1.20 1.18 1.00 0.90 0.77 0.64 0.51 0.38 0.38 Haiti 1.45 1.40 1.35 1.30 1.25 1.20
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/SOCC/02socc.pdf
  • 1.40 1.30 1.25 1.00 0.80 0.65 0.55 0.38 0.38 0.38 Dominican Republic 8/ 9/ 1.39 1.36 1.29 1.30 1.10 0.90 0.70 0.60 0.38 0.38 0.38 0.38 0.38 Egypt 9/ 1.80 1.70 1.60 1.50 1.40 1.40 1.30 1.30 1.10 0.70 0.46 0.46 0.46 El Salvador 9/ 1.40 1.30 1.25 1.20 1.20 1.10 0.88 0.77 0.60 0.48 0.38 0.38 0.38 France 9/ 1.43 0.96 0.97 0.62 0.54 0.35 0.26 0.21 0.21 0.19 0.19 0.20 0.21 Germany 9/ 1.43 1.10 0.83 0.51 0.39 0.23 0.20 0.21 0.21 0.19 0.19 0.20 0.21 Greece 9/ 2.19 1.66 1.55 1.41 1.26 1.01 0.86 0.55 0.30 0.26 0.25 0.26 0.27 Guatemala 9/ 1.50 1.40 1.30 1.20 1.18 1.00 0.90 0.77 0.64 0.51 0.38 0.38 0.38 Haiti 1.40 1.35
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/SOCC/95socc.pdf
  • UTAH 179.6 (0.36) 179.9 28.2 151.7 62.9 65.8 23.0 151.7 UT VERMONT 78.3 2.44 75.9 5.3 70.6 23.7 40.7 6.2 70.6 VT VIRGINIA 828.0 (2.43) 830.4 233.3 597.1 291.7 205.4 99.2 596.3 0.741 VA WASHINGTON 686.2 (13.43) 699.6 203.9 495.7 228.3 209.2 58.2 495.7 WA WEST VIRGINIA 170.9 (0.22) 171.1 26.0 145.1 90.6 41.4 12.9 144.8 0.255 WV WISCONSIN 417.5 1.43 416.0 99.7 316.3 148.3 121.7 46.2 316.1 0.225 WI WYOMING 56.1 0.63 55.5 9.8 45.7 16.2 24.3 5.2 45.7 WY PUERTO RICO 211.0 211.0 211.0 117.7 65.9 27.5 211.0 PR UNCLASSIFIED STATISTICS OF COMMUNICATIONS COMMON CARRIERS T A B L E 2 . 1 3 - - REVENUES OF TELEPHONE CARRIERS REPORTING QUARTERLY TO THE COMMISSION FOR THE YEAR ENDED
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/SOCC/96socc.pdf
  • 2.05 0.68 1.34 1.97 3.84 1.23 2.40 0.82 1.60 1.75 3.48 1.10 2.19 0.72 1.44 1985 6/ 1.66 3.29 1.00 1.98 0.67 1.32 1.97 3.84 1.19 2.32 0.79 1.55 1.75 3.48 1.05 2.09 0.70 1.39 1986 7/ 1.46 2.85 0.86 1.70 0.62 1.23 1.72 3.35 1.04 2.03 0.76 1.48 1.55 3.04 0.91 1.80 0.66 1.31 1987 8/ 1.17 2.32 0.71 1.43 0.55 1.09 1.46 2.90 0.90 1.80 0.69 1.37 1.27 2.51 0.72 1.44 0.60 1.18 1988 9/ 1.07 2.12 0.69 1.37 0.53 1.06 1.35 2.69 0.88 1.75 0.68 1.35 1.20 2.40 0.72 1.44 0.59 1.18 1989 10/ 1.07 2.15 0.72 1.45 0.57 1.15 1.17 2.35 0.77 1.55 0.61 1.22 1.07 2.15 0.72 1.45 0.57 1.15 1990 11/ 1.05 2.10 0.69 1.38
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/SOCC/97socc.pdf
  • 0.43 2.42 29.1 OH OKLAHOMA 99.6 102.9 (3.2) (10.1) 6.9 (0.36) (0.06) 0.09 (0.33) 7.2 OK OREGON 81.7 61.2 20.5 13.5 6.9 (2.09) (0.70) (0.51) (3.31) 10.2 OR PENNSYLVANIA 398.3 198.3 179.1 135.2 43.9 7.85 1.23 3.06 12.13 31.7 PA RHODE ISLAND 24.3 0.2 18.0 13.2 4.8 0.21 (0.06) 0.06 0.21 4.6 RI SOUTH CAROLINA 43.6 0.7 21.8 18.9 2.9 (1.43) (0.73) (0.28) (2.44) 5.3 SC SOUTH DAKOTA (2.5) (0.0) (3.7) (2.9) (0.7) (0.97) (0.61) (0.62) (2.19) 1.5 SD TENNESSEE 66.2 0.0 50.0 33.8 16.2 (0.63) 0.23 0.16 (0.24) 16.4 TN TEXAS 284.0 65.7 138.6 99.3 39.3 0.34 0.13 1.79 2.26 37.0 TX UTAH 33.4 (0.0) 26.7 17.9 8.8 1.45 1.16 1.05 3.66 5.1 UT VERMONT 13.0 0.1 9.5 6.9 2.6
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/SOCC/98SOCC.PDF
  • BALEARIC 1.93 1.31 FRANCE 1.59 1.02 ISLANDS, CANARY ISLANDS, GERMANY, FEDERAL REPUBLIC OF 1.48 0.98 CEUTA AND MELILLA) (INCLUDING FORMER GERMAN SWEDEN 1.57 1.02 DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC) SWITZERLAND 1.67 1.04 GREECE 2.32 1.56 TAIWAN 2.37 1.44 GUATEMALA 2.10 1.67 THAILAND 2.40 1.51 HAITI 2.09 1.77 TRINIDAD & TOBAGO, REPUBLIC OF 1.93 1.52 HONDURAS 2.28 1.67 TURKEY 2.19 1.57 HONG KONG 2.19 1.43 UNITED KINGDOM (INCLUDING THE 1.29 0.94 INDIA 3.14 2.57 CHANNEL ISLANDS, ENGLAND, IRELAND 1.61 1.06 ISLE OF MAN, NORTHERN IRELAND, ISRAEL 2.34 1.58 SCOTLAND AND WALES) ITALY 1.79 1.27 VENEZUELA 1.61 1.21 CLASSES OF SERVICE AT&T CARD LEC CARD COMMERCIAL CREDIT CARD CUSTOMER DIALED CALLING CARD STATION: CUSTOMER DIALED/AUTOMATED $2.00 $3.00 $3.50 CUSTOMER DIALED AND OPERATOR ASSISTED 2.50 4.00 4.50
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/SOCC/99socc.pdf
  • 2.93 2.91 2.67 2.13 1.69 1.40 1.01 0.98 Colombia 1.75 1.60 1.55 1.50 1.40 1.30 1.25 1.00 0.80 0.65 0.65 Dominican Republic 1.42 1.39 1.36 1.29 1.30 1.10 0.90 0.70 0.60 0.38 0.38 Egypt 1.90 1.80 1.70 1.60 1.50 1.40 1.40 1.30 1.30 1.10 0.90 El Salvador 1.50 1.40 1.30 1.25 1.20 1.20 1.10 0.88 0.77 0.60 0.60 France 1.71 1.43 0.96 0.97 0.62 0.54 0.35 0.26 0.21 0.21 0.20 Germany 1.71 1.43 1.10 0.83 0.51 0.39 0.23 0.20 0.21 0.21 0.20 Greece 2.32 2.19 1.66 1.55 1.41 1.26 1.01 0.86 0.55 0.30 0.29 Guatemala 1.50 1.50 1.40 1.30 1.20 1.18 1.00 0.90 0.77 0.64 0.58 Hong Kong 2.20 1.90 1.60 1.20 1.00 1.00 0.94 0.79 0.72 0.14 0.13 India 2.25
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/SOCC/prelim02socc.pdf
  • 1.40 1.30 1.25 1.00 0.80 0.65 0.55 0.38 0.38 0.38 Dominican Republic 8/ 10/ 1.39 1.36 1.29 1.30 1.10 0.90 0.70 0.60 0.38 0.38 0.38 0.38 0.38 Egypt 10/ 1.80 1.70 1.60 1.50 1.40 1.40 1.30 1.30 1.10 0.70 0.46 0.46 0.46 El Salvador 10/ 1.40 1.30 1.25 1.20 1.20 1.10 0.88 0.77 0.60 0.48 0.38 0.38 0.38 France 10/ 1.43 0.96 0.97 0.62 0.54 0.35 0.26 0.21 0.21 0.19 0.19 0.20 0.21 Germany 10/ 1.43 1.10 0.83 0.51 0.39 0.23 0.20 0.21 0.21 0.19 0.19 0.20 0.21 Greece 10/ 2.19 1.66 1.55 1.41 1.26 1.01 0.86 0.55 0.30 0.26 0.25 0.26 0.27 Guatemala 10/ 1.50 1.40 1.30 1.20 1.18 1.00 0.90 0.77 0.64 0.51 0.38 0.38 0.38 Haiti 1.40 1.35
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Miscellaneous/Orders/1999/fcc99146.pdf
  • assumed) 5 30,780 33,769 13 33,345 Marine (Ship) 7,100 6 10 426,000 467,375 7 497,000 GMRS/Other LM 68,700 6 5 2,061,000 2,261,172 7 2,404,500 Aviation (Aircraft) 4,500 6 10 270,000 296,223 7 315,000 Marine (Coast) 1,400 6 5 42,000 46,079 7 49,000 Aviation (Ground) 1,600 6 5 48,000 52,662 7 56,000 Amateur Vanity Call Signs 6,800 6 10 88,400 96,986 1.43 96,732 AM/FM Radio 8,905 1,370 1 12,195,735 13,380,229 1,500 13,381,900 AM Construction Permits 75 235 1 17,625 19,337 260 19,500 FM Construction Permits 300 1,150 1 345,000 378,508 1,250 375,000 Satellite TV 109 1,175 1 128,075 140,514 1,300 141,700 Satellite TV Construction Permit 6 420 1 2,520 2,765 460 2,760 VHF Markets 1-10 42 37,575 1 1,578,150 1,731,426 41,225 1,731,450
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireline_Competition/Orders/2002/fcc02118.pdf
  • Status PR-8-01-2100 Open Orders in a Hold Status > 30 Days 0.02 0 0.01 0 0.01 0 0.01 0 0 0 PR-8-02-2100 Open Orders in a Hold Status > 90 Days 0 0 0.01 0 0.01 0 0.01 0 0 0 POTS ­ Business PR-2 - Average Completed Interval PR-2-01-2110 Average Interval Completed ­ Total No Dispatch 0.78 1.4 0.65 1.43 PR-2-03-2110 Average Interval Completed ­ Dispatch (1-5 Lines) 2.9 4.53 2.82 3.71 Federal Communications Commission FCC 02-118 B-9 Metric Metric September October November December January Notes Number Name VZ CLEC VZ CLEC VZ CLEC VZ CLEC VZ CLEC POTS ­ Residence PR-2 - Average Completed Interval PR-2-01-2120 Average Interval Completed ­ Total No Dispatch 0.71 0 0.57 0.43 a,b PR-2-03-2120
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2002/FCC-02-112A1.html
  • Press Publ'g Co v. Walling, 327 U.S. 186, 217 (1946) (rejecting petitioners' argument that agency subpoena power would subject them to impermissible inconvenience, expense, and harrassment precisely because ``they may make appropriate defense surrounded by every safeguard of judicial restraint.'') (internal quotation omitted). 51 See NAL Response at 22-26. 52 See supra n.7. 53 See supra 3. 54 47 C.F.R. 1.43, 1.44. 55 Moreover, as we discuss above, see supra 17, even after the issuance of this Forfeiture Order, SBC may choose not to pay the forfeiture and to raise a challenge to our findings in a trial de novo should the Department of Justice prosecute any collection action we may refer. 56 47 U.S.C. 408. 57 47 U.S.C. 416(c). 58
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2002/FCC-02-168A1.html
  • use of the Commission's enforcement and prosecutorial discretion. We note in this regard that the Bureau resolved numerous similar situations through similar consent decrees or through admonishments.3 ORDERING CLAUSE 3. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to Sections 4(i), 4(j), 5(c)(4), and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. 154(i), 154(j), 155(c)(4) and 503(b), and Sections 1.41, 1.43 and 1.115 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. 1.41, 1.43, 1.115, that the ``Petition for Special Relief, or in the Alternative, Application for Review'' filed by the Office of Communications of the United Church of Christ, Inc. on February 15, 2002, IS DENIED, and that the ``Request for Stay'' filed by the Office of Communications of the United Church of
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2010/FCC-10-43A1.html
  • 405, and section 1.106 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. S: 1.106, that Farmers' Petition for Reconsideration IS DENIED. 19. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), 201, 203, 206, 207, 208, 209, and 405 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. S:S: 154(i), 154(j), 201, 203, 206, 207, 208, 209, and 405, and sections 1.43, 1.44(e) and 1.106 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. S:S: 1.43, 1.44(e), and 1.106, that Farmers' Petition for Stay IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Marlene H. Dortch Secretary Petition for Reconsideration, File No. EB-07-MD-001 (filed Dec. 18, 2009) ("Petition for Reconsideration"). Qwest Commc'ns Corp. v. Farmers and Merchants Mut. Tel. Co., Second Order on Reconsideration, 24 FCC Rcd 14801 (2009)
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-12-2A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-12-2A1.pdf
  • in table 17 are positive, though statistically insignificant. Table 17 Effect of LPFM Entry on the Ratings of Full-Service Commercial FM Stations with Particular Program Formats Miscellaneous Format Ethnic and Spanish Formats Religion Format Miscellaneous, Ethnic, and Religion Formats Contour Measure All Market Ratings 0.018 (0.17) 0.002 (0.21) 0.014 (0.17) 0.014 (1.73) Home Market Ratings 0.088 (0.28) 0.001 (0.03) 0.027 (1.43) 0.029 (1.59) Market Measure All Market Ratings 0.018 (0.39) 0.017 (1.39) 0.004 (0.49) 0.007 (0.77) Home Market Ratings 0.088 (0.28) 0.015 (0.53) 0.002 (0.12) 0.008 (0.53) Contour/Market Measure All Market Ratings 0.018 (0.17) 0.006 (0.27) 0.021 (1.44) 0.022 (1.54) Home Market Ratings 0.088 (0.28) 0.004 (0.12) 0.024 (1.02) 0.028 (1.23) * - estimated regression coefficient is different from zero at
• http://www.fcc.gov/ib/pd/pf/csreport.pdf
  • 11,344 4,229 0.13 0.26 0.42 0.52 7 10 10 8 9Korea, South 2,678 7,289 35 10,002 5,178 0.37 0.56 0.59 0.98 1 11 6 9 15Sweden 3,198 6,568 0 9,766 1,806 0.49 0.28 0.30 0.60 6 12 12 11 11Brazil 1,939 7,556 221 9,716 1,505 0.25 0.58 0.64 1.24 1 13 14 19 21Switzerland 1,991 6,570 0 8,561 2,133 0.30 1.43 1.11 1.33 3 14 24 26 28Israel 1,141 5,093 180 6,414 582 0.22 0.82 1.28 1.77 7 15 19 20 20Singapore 867 4,748 152 5,767 2,604 0.18 0.43 0.40 0.56 6 16 29 n.a. n.a.Chile 1,081 4,585 38 5,704 1,308 0.23 0.82 1.09 1.96 7 17 13 12 14Philippines 3,143 1,847 2 4,992 2,574 1.70 2.17 3.43 5.05 6 18
• http://www.fcc.gov/ib/pd/pf/csreport_2000.pdf
  • 1,137 0.27 0.29 0.70 1.64 1 16 24 17 18Italy 2,740 10,294 0 13,034 4,260 0.27 3.29 2.35 1.98 3 17 14 24 26Israel 1,357 9,138 240 10,735 388 0.14 0.21 0.75 1.28 6 18 16 29 n.a .Chile 1,177 7,847 90 9,114 373 0.15 0.22 0.82 1.08 1 19 13 14 19Switzerland 2,799 6,235 0 9,034 1,947 0.45 0.30 1.43 1.11 7 20 23 n.a . 21India 1,839 5,920 0 7,759 280 0.31 0.46 1.40 1.77 6 21 20 23 29Argentina 1,041 6,347 151 7,539 8,467 0.16 0.22 0.46 0.76 7 22 17 13 12Philippines 3,862 3,647 2 7,511 1,567 1.06 1.59 2.17 3.42 6 23 21 28 27Colombia 1,699 5,452 142 7,293 7,526 0.30 0.58 1.26 1.52 8 24
• http://www.fcc.gov/ib/sand/agree/files/mex-bc/am.pdf
  • 2800 1.69 2900 L.55 d (km) 3000 3100 3200 3300 3400 3500 3600 3700 3800 3900 4000 4100 4200 4300 4400 4500 4600 4700. 4800 4900 5000. 5100- 5200 5300 -5400-- 5500 5600 5700 5800 5900 6000 6200 6400 6600 6800 7000 7200 7400 7600 7800 8000 8200 8400 8600 8800 9000 9200 9400 9600 9800 LOOOO Fe (&I 50% 1.43 1.33 1.23 1.15 1.07 1.00 0.94 0.88 0.83 0.79 01.75 0.71 0.67 0.64 0.61 0.58 0.55 0.53 - 0.51 0.48 - 0.46 0.45 0.43. --_ 0.41 - 0.40 .- s. 0.38 -. 0.37. '-. . . ._.. 0.36 0.34 0.33 0.32 0.30 . 0.28 . 0.27 0.25 0.24 0.23 0.22 0.21 0.20 0.19 0.18 0.17 . 0.17 0.16 0.15 0.15
• http://www.fcc.gov/mb/peer_review/prlpfm_rpt_economic_study.pdf
  • statistically insignificant. Federal Communications Commission DA 12-2 97 Table 17 Effect of LPFM Entry on the Ratings of Full-Service Commercial FM Stations with Particular Program Formats Miscellaneous Format Ethnic and Spanish Formats Religion Format Miscellaneous, Ethnic, and Religion Formats Contour Measure All Market Ratings 0.018 (0.17) 0.002 (0.21) 0.014 (0.17) 0.014 (1.73) Home Market Ratings 0.088 (0.28) 0.001 (0.03) 0.027 (1.43) 0.029 (1.59) Market Measure All Market Ratings 0.018 (0.39) 0.017 (1.39) 0.004 (0.49) 0.007 (0.77) Home Market Ratings 0.088 (0.28) 0.015 (0.53) 0.002 (0.12) 0.008 (0.53) Contour/Market Measure All Market Ratings 0.018 (0.17) 0.006 (0.27) 0.021 (1.44) 0.022 (1.54) Home Market Ratings 0.088 (0.28) 0.004 (0.12) 0.024 (1.02) 0.028 (1.23) * -estimated regression coefficient is different from zero at the
• http://www.fcc.gov/mb/peer_review/prrespstudy4.pdf
  • clustering at the market level. *** indicates significance at the 1 percent level. ** indicates significance at the 5 percent level. * indicates significance at the 10 percent level. 9 Table I.7R Analysis of News Minutes Provided ­ Additional Regressions N2: Controlled for Market N3: Full Fixed Effects Variable Coefficient Robust Std. Error Coefficient Robust Std. Error TotPop1000s 3.71 ** 1.43 -0.19 *** 0.03 PopPercentBlack 1,459.09 *** 438.50 191.54 *** 43.48 PopPercentHisp -53.07 229.41 30.64 * 18.43 DMAPerCapitaIncome -0.13 0.14 -0.01 0.01 UnrelatedStationsinDMACount 709.98 *** 215.36 26.20 18.10 UnrelatedStationsinDMANewsMin -0.67 *** 0.04 0.00 0.01 ParentStationsCount -3.09 *** 1.04 -0.09 1.87 ParentRevenueMillions -0.00 0.03 -0.14 0.10 OtherCoOwnedStationsinDMACount 586.30 *** 216.19 -220.37 *** 69.63 OtherCoOwnStationsinDMANewsMin -0.60 *** 0.05 0.12 *** 0.02 Local Marketing
• http://www.fcc.gov/mb/peer_review/prrespstudy4c.pdf
  • I again thank Scott for his time and comments. Table 1 Updated Logistic Fixed Effects Regression Results Without Broadband Lines Per Person With Broadband Lines Per Person Variable Coefficient P-value Odds Ratio Coefficient P-value Odds Ratio News Format Prior Period 6.59*** 0.00 727.49 6.59*** 0.000 725.18 AM Station 1.81*** 0.00 6.10 1.85*** 0.000 6.35 Crossowned With Newspaper 1.46** 0.04 4.29 1.43** 0.041 4.16 Crossowned With TV Station 0.79*** 0.00 2.20 0.79*** 0.000 2.21 Commercial Station -1.45*** 0.00 0.24 -1.50*** 0.000 0.22 Local Marketing Agreement -0.42 0.15 0.66 -0.39 0.182 0.67 Sibling News Station in Market 0.39*** 0.01 1.47 0.41*** 0.007 1.51 Owner in Same State 0.24* 0.06 1.27 0.23* 0.078 1.26 Parent Stations in Market 0.04 0.16 1.04 0.05 0.138 1.05
• http://www.fcc.gov/ogc/documents/opinions/2000/99-1220.doc http://www.fcc.gov/ogc/documents/opinions/2000/99-1220.html
  • affirmatively communicated their lack of continued interest. The tariff revisions immediately remedied Sprint's system capacity problems. The occupancy level of the New York gateway switch declined from 109% on April 12, to 59% on April 19, the day after the program was revised. The total number of calls made to those countries dropped from 3.69 million on April 12 to 1.43 million on April 19, 1996. See Hi-Tech, 14 F.C.C.R. at 8048. On April 18, 1996, the day the tariff revisions became effective, Hi-Tech filed a class action in Missouri state court, alleging that Sprint had breached its contract with its Fridays Free subscribers. Sprint removed the case to the United States District Court for the Western District of Missouri. There,
• http://www.fcc.gov/pshs/docs/clearinghouse/references/minneapolis-bridge-report.pdf
  • 2.30 16-QAM 1/2 UGS 79 124 2.69 QPSK 1/2 ErtPS 79 63 1.37 QPSK 1/2 UGS 79 63 1.37 MIMO Antenna Configuration (G.711 Vocoder) UL Modulation Coding Rate Scheduling Type Requested BW (Kbps) per mobile Channel Capacity Improvement ratio over Minneapolis P25 network 16-QAM 1/2 ErtPS 79 126 2.74 16-QAM 1/2 UGS 79 132 2.86 QPSK 1/2 ErtPS 79 66 1.43 QPSK 1/2 UGS 79 66 1.43 MIMO Antenna Configuration (G.729 Vocoder) UL Modulation Coding Rate Scheduling Type Requested BW (Kbps) per mobile Channel Capacity Improvement ratio over Minneapolis P25 network 16-QAM 1/2 ErtPS 26.8 335 7.27 16-QAM 1/2 UGS 26.8 344 7.48 Table 10 - Detailed Summary Results 7.4. Voice and Video Analysis CSAD analyzed the impact of potential video