FCC Web Documents citing 1.363

as compiled by hallikainen.com/FccRules on 2012 07 01

• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-292A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-292A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-292A1.txt
  • the exhibits' preparation. Moreover, to the extent Georgia Power validly objected to the Complaint's discussion of the Singleton Audit without proper verification from Patrick Casey, the individual who conducted the inspections relating to pole change-outs, Knology remedied that problem by submitting a supplemental affidavit from Mr. Casey. Georgia Power also claims that the Complaint fails to comply with Commission rule 1.363, which governs the ``Introduction of Statistical Data.'' We decline to hold Knology to the standard of that rule in this case. Mr. Singleton, who conducted Knology's ``independent audit,'' states that he had ``very limited information at hand,'' because of Georgia Power's unwillingness to produce field notes. According to Mr. Singleton, Georgia Power's refusal to provide the requested information prevented him
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-127A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-127A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-127A1.txt
  • change or tariff filing for a service not previously offered, the issuing carrier must file the working papers containing the information underlying the data supplied in response to paragraph (b) of this section, and a clear explanation of how the working papers relate to that information. (2) All statistical studies must be submitted and supported in the form prescribed in §1.363 of this chapter. (d) Form and content of additional material to be submitted with certain rate increases. In the circumstances set out in paragraphs (d)(1) and (2) of this section, the issuing carrier must submit all additional cost, marketing and other data underlying the working papers to justify a proposed rate increase. The issuing carrier must submit this information in
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-92A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-92A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-92A1.txt
  • change or tariff filing for a service not previously offered, the issuing carrier must file the working papers containing the information underlying the data supplied in response to paragraph (b) of this section, and a clear explanation of how the working papers relate to that information. (2) All statistical studies must be submitted and supported in the form prescribed in §1.363 of this chapter. (d) Form and content of additional material to be submitted with certain rate increases. In the circumstances set out in paragraphs (d)(1) and (2) of this section, the issuing carrier must submit all additional cost, marketing and other data underlying the working papers to justify a proposed rate increase. The issuing carrier must submit this information in
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2003/FCC-03-292A1.html
  • exhibits' preparation. Moreover, to the extent Georgia Power validly objected to the Complaint's discussion of the Singleton Audit without proper verification from Patrick Casey, the individual who conducted the inspections relating to pole change-outs, Knology remedied that problem by submitting a supplemental affidavit from Mr. Casey.65 21. Georgia Power also claims that the Complaint fails to comply with Commission rule 1.363, which governs the ``Introduction of Statistical Data.''66 We decline to hold Knology to the standard of that rule in this case. Mr. Singleton, who conducted Knology's ``independent audit,'' states that he had ``very limited information at hand,'' because of Georgia Power's unwillingness to produce field notes.67 According to Mr. Singleton, Georgia Power's refusal to provide the requested information prevented him
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Cable/Orders/2000/fcc00116.doc
  • states that 13.5 feet may be used in lieu of actual measurement as the amount of usable space, but that it may be rebutted. 47 C.F.R. § 1.1404(g)(11). We have stated that a survey that yields a statistically reliable result would be acceptable. See Second Report and Order at ¶ 21. Such a survey must meet the requirements of Section 1.363 of the Commission's Rules. 47 C.F.R. § 1.363. See NESC (1997 edition), Forward at vi.; see also Ohio Edison Comments at 21-22 (arguing that the Commission's rules should expressly allow a utility to use a different average of usable space for its rate calculations than the Commission's rebuttable presumption if state law requires a minimum ground clearance at the pole
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr04-3.pdf
  • 3.721 Montana 198,295,670 542,127 365.77 27,948,400 2.616 Nebraska 276,988,107 911,103 304.01 14,644,316 1.371 Nevada 278,106,292 1,347,190 206.43 6,361,821 0.595 New Hampshire 202,198,914 812,911 248.73 877,478 0.082 New Jersey 1,361,912,851 6,628,315 205.47 0 0.000 New Mexico 326,299,860 990,104 329.56 19,215,068 1.798 New York 2,921,972,068 12,581,000 232.25 10,135,120 0.949 North Carolina 1,474,152,929 4,999,581 294.86 14,196,100 1.329 North Dakota 125,821,750 389,363 323.15 14,567,747 1.363 Northern Mariana Islands 7,094,854 22,206 319.50 0 0.000 Ohio 1,480,547,050 6,891,138 214.85 9,358,457 0.876 Oklahoma 602,267,820 1,933,297 311.52 48,497,422 4.539 Oregon 624,966,072 2,082,960 300.04 25,403,988 2.378 Pennsylvania 1,786,180,983 8,001,521 223.23 2,036,854 0.191 Puerto Rico 532,612,088 1,289,665 412.98 0 0.000 Rhode Island 125,770,240 595,651 211.15 0 0.000 South Carolina 795,779,159 2,312,026 344.19 27,706,346 2.593 South Dakota 140,895,329 393,174 358.35 16,920,110 1.584
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2003/FCC-03-292A1.html
  • exhibits' preparation. Moreover, to the extent Georgia Power validly objected to the Complaint's discussion of the Singleton Audit without proper verification from Patrick Casey, the individual who conducted the inspections relating to pole change-outs, Knology remedied that problem by submitting a supplemental affidavit from Mr. Casey.65 21. Georgia Power also claims that the Complaint fails to comply with Commission rule 1.363, which governs the ``Introduction of Statistical Data.''66 We decline to hold Knology to the standard of that rule in this case. Mr. Singleton, who conducted Knology's ``independent audit,'' states that he had ``very limited information at hand,'' because of Georgia Power's unwillingness to produce field notes.67 According to Mr. Singleton, Georgia Power's refusal to provide the requested information prevented him