FCC Web Documents citing 1.279

as compiled by hallikainen.com/FccRules on 2012 07 01

• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1658A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1658A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1658A1.txt
  • this chapter. Procedures pertaining to appeals from rulings of the presiding officer are set forth in §§ 1.301 and 1.302. Procedures pertaining to reconsideration and review of actions taken pursuant to delegated authority are set forth in §§ 1.101, 1.102, 1.104, 1.106, 1.113, 1.115, and 1.117. Procedures pertaining to exceptions to initial decisions are set forth in §§ 1.276 through 1.279. * * * * * Amend § 0.211 by revising paragraph (e) to read as follows: § 0.211 Chairman. * * * * * (e) Authority to act as ``Head of the Agency'' or ``Agency Head'' for administrative determinations required by the Federal Acquisition Regulation and Federal Management Circulars. * * * * * Amend § 0.231 by revising paragraph
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/SOCC/95socc.pdf
  • OR PENNSYLVANIA 1,288.8 (2.42) 1,291.2 310.6 907.2 466.4 309.6 129.0 904.9 2.271 PA RHODE ISLAND 114.0 0.03 114.0 1.2 112.8 43.2 62.0 7.6 112.8 RI SOUTH CAROLINA 340.3 11.03 329.2 78.0 251.2 137.7 81.9 30.9 250.5 0.741 SC SOUTH DAKOTA 66.9 (0.45) 67.4 12.5 54.9 20.5 24.8 9.6 54.9 SD TENNESSEE 487.2 (3.39) 490.6 87.1 403.5 214.1 131.6 56.5 402.2 1.279 TN TEXAS 2,536.2 16.36 2,519.8 1,055.6 1,464.3 743.8 445.2 275.2 1,464.3 TX UTAH 179.6 (0.36) 179.9 28.2 151.7 62.9 65.8 23.0 151.7 UT VERMONT 78.3 2.44 75.9 5.3 70.6 23.7 40.7 6.2 70.6 VT VIRGINIA 828.0 (2.43) 830.4 233.3 597.1 291.7 205.4 99.2 596.3 0.741 VA WASHINGTON 686.2 (13.43) 699.6 203.9 495.7 228.3 209.2 58.2 495.7 WA WEST VIRGINIA 170.9
• http://www.fcc.gov/ogc/documents/opinions/1997/mission.html http://www.fcc.gov/ogc/documents/opinions/1997/mission.wp
  • excepted to the ALJ's determination in 1985 that Mission was financially qualified. Mission relies upon an agency rule that "[a]ny objection not saved by exception filed pursuant to this section is waived." 47 C.F.R. 1.277(a). As the Commission points out, however, that rule is a limitation upon parties, not upon the agency itself, which is authorized but not required (in 1.279) "to limit its review of those issues raised in exceptions." See Marlin Broadcasting of Central Florida, Inc. v. FCC, 952 F.2d 507, 514 (D.C. Cir. 1992) (although party waives objection not raised in exceptions, Commission may raise any objection sua sponte). Nor is it the case, as Mission alleges, that by raising the issue of Mission's financial qualifications the Commission