FCC Web Documents citing 1.251

as compiled by hallikainen.com/FccRules on 2012 07 01

• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-714A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-714A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-714A1.txt
  • increased to $148 million. The revenue threshold between larger Class A carriers and mid-sized carriers is increased to $8.757 billion. The revenue thresholds for 2011 were determined as follows: Class A to Class B Larger Class A to Mid-size Threshold Threshold (1) GDP-CPI Base (2005=100) 77.146 91.144 (2) 2011 GDP-CPI 114.061 114.061 (3) Inflation Factor (line 2 ÷ 1) 1.479 1.251 (4) Original Revenue Threshold $100 million $7 billion (5) 2011 Revenue Threshold (line 3 * 4) $148 million $8.757 billion Action by Acting Chief, Pricing Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 32.11, 43.21, 43.43, 64.903. See 47 C.F.R. § 32.9000. Section 402(c) of the Telecommunications Act of 1996 Act mandates that we adjust this revenue threshold annually
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-414A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-414A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-414A1.txt
  • relevant documents from the Joint Motion in the expectation that there would be no further inquiry. C. Exceptions 35. As a procedural matter, Liberty contends that the ALJ violated the Commission's summary decision procedures by issuing his I.D. immediately following denial of the Joint Motion, instead of holding a hearing on the remaining issues in accordance with 47 C.F.R. § 1.251(e). On the merits, Liberty initially argues that the I.D.'s negative candor findings with regard to Liberty's confidentiality and privilege assertions relating to the IAR, and its judicial appeal of the Commission's ruling, are inconsistent with Liberty's constitutional right to due process in filing its appeal, federal rules of civil procedure, its right to judicial review under 47 U.S.C. § 402,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01D-2A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01D-2A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01D-2A1.txt
  • hurricane storm damage. CONCLUSIONS OF LAW The Commission's rules provide that in considering summary decision: The party filing the motion may not rest upon mere allegations or denials but must show, by affidavit or by other materials subject to consideration by the presiding officer, that there is no genuine issue of material fact for determination at the hearing. 47 C.F.R. §1.251(a)(1). As the moving parties on cross motions, the Bureau and Family each has the burden of establishing that a favorable summary decision would be appropriate based on the pleadings and the papers submitted. Summary Decision Procedures, 34 F.C.C. 2d 485, 487-88 (1972). Considerable weight will be given to the admissions of Family. Family has filed Declarations of Barbara James-Petersen and
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-91A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-91A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-91A1.txt
  • as to any material fact or that it is otherwise entitled to summary decision. We therefore designate for consolidated hearing before the Presiding Judge in EB Docket No. 01-39 the transfer of control applications filed by Family Broadcasting Inc. in connection with Stations WSTX(AM) and WSTX-FM. The legal standard for a Motion for Summary Decision is set forth in section 1.251 of the rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.251. That provision specifies in pertinent part that: ``(d) [t]he presiding officer, giving appropriate weight to the nature of the proceeding, the issue or issues, the proof, and to the need for cross-examination, may grant a motion for summary decision to the extent that the pleadings, affidavits, materials obtained by discovery or otherwise, admissions,
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref98.pdf
  • February 15, 1943 0.200.200.20 0.350.350.35 1.051.051.05 1.201.051.05 2.201.20 1.20 2.801.75 1.75 4.453.303.30 7.80 5.50 5.50 11.00 8.25 8.25 July 1, 1945 0.200.200.20 0.350.350.35 1.051.051.05 1.201.051.05 2.201.20 1.20 2.801.75 1.75 4.453.303.30 6.15 4.95 4.95 6.70 5.50 5.50 February 1, 1946 0.200.200.20 0.350.350.35 1.051.051.05 1.201.051.05 2.201.20 1.20 2.801.75 1.75 4.453.303.30 5.55 4.45 4.45 6.70 5.50 5.50 March 1, 1952 0.250.250.25 0.500.500.50 1.051.051.05 1.251.051.05 2.201.20 1.20 2.801.75 1.75 3.952.852.85 5.55 4.45 4.45 6.70 5.50 5.50 October 1, 1953 0.250.250.25 0.500.500.50 1.051.051.05 1.601.101.10 2.201.65 1.65 3.152.20 2.20 4.303.303.30 5.90 4.80 4.80 7.05 5.85 5.85 September 19, 19590.250.250.25 0.500.500.50 1.051.051.05 1.601.101.10 2.201.65 1.65 3.152.20 2.20 4.253.253.25 4.95 3.85 3.85 6.45 4.90 4.90 April 4, 1963 0.450.450.45 0.550.550.55 1.051.051.05 1.601.101.10 2.201.65 1.65 3.152.20 1.65 4.253.252.10 4.95 3.85
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref99.pdf
  • February 15, 1943 0.200.200.20 0.350.350.35 1.051.051.05 1.201.051.05 2.201.20 1.20 2.801.75 1.75 4.453.303.30 7.80 5.50 5.50 11.00 8.25 8.25 July 1, 1945 0.200.200.20 0.350.350.35 1.051.051.05 1.201.051.05 2.201.20 1.20 2.801.75 1.75 4.453.303.30 6.15 4.95 4.95 6.70 5.50 5.50 February 1, 1946 0.200.200.20 0.350.350.35 1.051.051.05 1.201.051.05 2.201.20 1.20 2.801.75 1.75 4.453.303.30 5.55 4.45 4.45 6.70 5.50 5.50 March 1, 1952 0.250.250.25 0.500.500.50 1.051.051.05 1.251.051.05 2.201.20 1.20 2.801.75 1.75 3.952.852.85 5.55 4.45 4.45 6.70 5.50 5.50 October 1, 1953 0.250.250.25 0.500.500.50 1.051.051.05 1.601.101.10 2.201.65 1.65 3.152.20 2.20 4.303.303.30 5.90 4.80 4.80 7.05 5.85 5.85 September 19, 19590.250.250.25 0.500.500.50 1.051.051.05 1.601.101.10 2.201.65 1.65 3.152.20 2.20 4.253.253.25 4.95 3.85 3.85 6.45 4.90 4.90 April 4, 1963 0.450.450.45 0.550.550.55 1.051.051.05 1.601.101.10 2.201.65 1.65 3.152.20 1.65 4.253.252.10 4.95 3.85
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr98-8.pdf
  • INDUSTRY) PREMIUM NON PREMIUM TOTAL COMMON LINE (TOTAL INDUSTRY) PERIOD ORIGINATING TERMINATING TOTAL ORIGINATING TERMINATING TOTAL ORIGINATING TERMINATING TOTAL JAN 1995 14,086.495 21,096.280 35,182.775 40.732 110.161 150.893 14,127.227 21,206.441 35,333.668 FEB 1995 13,528.586 20,889.212 34,417.798 42.033 101.856 143.889 13,570.619 20,991.068 34,561.687 MAR 1995 14,046.031 21,469.529 35,515.560 44.597 99.070 143.668 14,090.628 21,568.599 35,659.228 APR 1995 13,959.051 21,359.319 35,318.370 42.200 98.668 140.868 14,001.251 21,457.987 35,459.238 MAY 1995 14,028.003 21,584.890 35,612.894 42.202 98.848 141.050 14,070.205 21,683.738 35,753.944 JUN 1995 13,959.575 21,496.752 35,456.328 44.371 96.928 141.299 14,003.946 21,593.680 35,597.627 JUL 1995 13,846.611 21,383.492 35,230.103 30.561 104.002 134.563 13,877.172 21,487.494 35,364.666 AUG 1995 14,402.293 23,075.455 37,477.748 33.389 108.725 142.115 14,435.682 23,184.180 37,619.863 SEP 1995 13,976.751 21,899.348 35,876.099 30.039 97.498 127.537 14,006.790 21,996.846 36,003.636 OCT 1995 14,258.656
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Orders/1999/da992033.doc
  • formal complaint rules are to the rules as they were in effect prior to March 18, 1998. Sections 1.720 through 1.735 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.720 - 1.735. Complainants argue, at paragraph II of their "Opposition To Defendants' Motion To Dismiss and Amended Motion For Summary Decision," that their motion for summary decision is permitted by Section 1.251(a)(1) of the Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.251(a)(1). However, that section is applicable only to hearing proceedings. 47 C.F.R. § 1.732. 47 C.F.R. § 1.729. The following pleadings are accepted as part of the record herein: defendants' "Statement Regarding Corporate Account Plan," filed on April 24, 1998 in response to the Commission's staff's directive in the April 20, 1998 status conference;