FCC Web Documents citing 1.22

as compiled by hallikainen.com/FccRules on 2012 07 01

• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-38A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-38A1.pdf http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-38A1.txt
  • use of microwave spectrum, including the 11 GHz band, while avoiding interference between operators. Although the rule on its face does not mandate a specific size of antenna, it does specify certain technical parameters - maximum beamwidth, minimum antenna gain, and minimum radiation suppression - that, given the current state of technology, limit operators to a minimum antenna size of 1.22 meters. When the Commission adopted the instant antenna specifications, the parameters were based on the technical sophistication of the communications equipment and the needs of the various users of the band at the time. Indeed, the Commission adopted similar technical specifications that effectively limited the size of antennas used in other bands, including those used by satellite. However, the Commission
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-87A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-87A5.txt
  • 1.68 n/a n/a 2.41 Ireland n/a 2.44 1.05 n/a 4.60 1.68 n/a 5.75 2.37 Luxembourg n/a 2.23 2.36 n/a 2.23 2.36 n/a 2.23 2.36 Netherlands 2.20 1.30 1.05 2.20 1.78 1.48 2.77 2.29 1.78 Portugal n/a 1.33 1.04 n/a 2.63 1.71 n/a 19.97 2.71 Spain 1.66 1.65 1.04 1.66 1.65 1.67 4.63 4.63 3.22 Sweden 1.84 1.26 0.90 2.36 1.96 1.22 3.27 2.67 1.67 U.K. 0.70 0.68 0.65 1.00 0.97 0.94 1.91 1.88 1.33 Notes: September 1997, $/ECU = 1.0981 May 1998, $/ECU = 1.1096 September 1999, $/EURO = 1.0497 Source: Interconnection Rates: 1997, 1998 from Porte-Parole, Falling Cost of Fixed Networked Telecommunications in Europe, July 1998, 1999 from The European Commission, Fifth Report on the Implementation of the Telecommunications Regulatory
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1092A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1092A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1092A1.txt
  • order to fashion an appropriate agenda item for WRC-2006 related to spectrum and associated regulatory issues for terrestrial wireless interactive multimedia applications. In light of this ongoing work at the ITU, the U.S. view will be developed when more information is available from the ITU and other entities. (April 18, 2001) IWG-1 DRAFT PRELIMINARY VIEWS ON WRC-03 WRC-2000 Agenda Item 1.22: to consider progress of ITU-R studies concerning future development of IMT-2000 and systems beyond IMT-2000, in accordance with Resolution 228 (WRC-2000). ISSUE: To study spectrum requirements and potential frequency ranges suitable for the future development of IMT-2000 and systems beyond IMT-2000, and in what time frame such spectrum would be needed, as well as ongoing enhancements of IMT-2000 systems and
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1286A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1286A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1286A1.txt
  • 16, 2005 This Order is effective upon release. FEDERAL COMMUNCIATIONS COMMISSION Donald Abelson Chief, International Bureau The term "Ka-band" generally refers to the space-to-earth (downlink) frequencies at 17.7-20.2 GHz and the corresponding earth-to-space (uplink) frequencies at 27.5-30.0 GHz. ISLs are communication links between in-orbit satellites. ISLs operate in spectrum allocated to the inter-satellite service. International Telecommunication Union (``ITU'') Radio Regulation S1.22. See In the Matter of GE Americom Communications Galaxy Inc. Application for Authority to Construct, Launch, and Operate a Ka-band Satellite System in the Fixed Satellite Service, Order and Authorization, 12 FCC Rcd 6475 (1997) (``GE Americom Authorization Order''). See Application for Modification of GE American Communications, Inc., File Nos. 169 through 173-SAT-P/LA-95, 54-SAT-AMEND-97 (dated November 18, 1997) (``GE Modification
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1287A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1287A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1287A1.txt
  • Rcd 1379 (Int'l Bur. 1997) (``CyberStar License''), modified, CyberStar Licensee LLC, Order and Authorization, 16 FCC Rcd 2442 (Int'l Bur. 2001) (``CyberStar Milestone Order''). See Loral Space ISL Order, 16 FCC Rcd at 2482 ¶ 2 & nn.7-8. ISLs are communication links between in-orbit satellites. ISLs operate in spectrum allocated to the inter-satellite service. International Telecommunication Union (``ITU'') Radio Regulation S1.22. CyberStar License, 13 FCC Rcd at 1386-87 ¶¶ 24-26. Id., 13 FCC Rcd at 1387-88 ¶ 27. Orion Network License, 12 FCC Rcd at 23037 ¶ 31; Orion Atlantic License, 13 FCC Rcd at 1426 ¶ 32. See Letter from Thomas S. Tycz, Chief, Satellite and Radiocommunication Division, FCC to Philip L. Verveer, Counsel for Loral Orion Network Systems, Inc.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1683A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1683A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1683A1.txt
  • (NGSO) Ka-Band system. See Teledesic Corporation, Application for Authority to Construct, Launch and Operate a Low Earth Orbit Satellite System in the Domestic and International Fixed Satellite Service, Order and Authorization, 12 FCC Rcd 3154 (Int'l Bur. 1997). ISLs are communication links between in-orbit satellites. ISLs operate in spectrum allocated to the inter-satellite service. See International Telecommunication Union Radio Regulation S1.22. DirectCom recognizes that these two orbital locations were reassigned to first round licensees a few days before it filed its application. See DirectCom application at 1. DirectCom indicates that it had based the engineering portion of its application on these orbital locations and did not have time to redo this portion of the application before the cut-off date, but would
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1687A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1687A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1687A1.txt
  • Secretary, Federal Communications Commission (June 7, 2001). Id. KaStarCom requests authority to conduct transfer orbit command functions in the 5.8565-5.8600 GHz and 6.4205-6.4240 GHz band and its telemetry functions in the 3.7000-3.7035 GHz bands and 4.1960-4.1995 GHz bands. ISLs are communication links between in-orbit satellites. ISLs operate in spectrum allocated to the inter-satellite service. See International Telecommunication Union Radio Regulation S1.22. Consolidated Reply to Oppositions of Pegasus, July 2, 1999, Consolidated Petition to Deny filed by Pegasus Development Corporation, filed May 25, 1999, Motorola's Consolidated Petition To Deny And Comments, filed May 21, 1999 and Consolidated Petitions to Dismiss, Deny or Defer of Hughes Communications Galaxy, Inc. and Hughes Communications Inc., filed May 21, 1999. Hughes contends that KaStarCom's proposed satellites
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1688A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1688A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1688A1.txt
  • of the 18 GHz band was designated for co-primary use by NGSO FSS and terrestrial fixed service operations, and for secondary use by GSO FSS. Id. at 13435 ¶ 10. Reconsideration of Ka-Band FSS Rules Order, FCC 01-172. ISLs are communication links between in-orbit satellites. ISLs operate in spectrum allocated to the inter-satellite service. See International Telecommunication Union Radio Regulation S1.22. LMC Application at p. 40. LMC also proposed using spectrum in the 59-64 GHz band for its long-range ISLs. See LMC Application at p. 40. This band, however, is not available for non-Government ISS use. LMC initially proposed to use 600 megahertz within the 22.55-23.55 GHz band and 600 megahertz within the 32.0-33.0 GHz band for ISL communications, or in
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1691A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1691A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1691A1.txt
  • by emissions from a space station under assumed free-space propagation conditions shall not exceed -95db(W/m2) for all angles of arrival. This limit may be exceeded by up to 3 dB for no more than 5% of the time. ISLs are communication links between in-orbit satellites. ISLs operate in spectrum allocated to the inter-satellite service. See International Telecommunication Union Radio Regulation S1.22. See Letter to Magalie Roman Salas, Secretary FCC, from Joseph Godles, Counsel for PanAmSat, dated July 6, 2001 at p. 3 Id. Id. at p. 4. For a detailed discussion of spectrum available for ISL operations, see Amendment of Part 2 of the Commission's Rules to Allocate Additional Spectrum to the Inter-Satellite, Fixed, and Mobile Services, ET Docket No. 99-261,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1692A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1692A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1692A1.txt
  • by emissions from a space station under assumed free-space propagation conditions shall not exceed -95db(W/m2) for all angles of arrival. This limit may be exceeded by up to 3 dB for no more than 5% of the time. ISLs are communication links between in-orbit satellites. ISLs operate in spectrum allocated to the inter-satellite service. See International Telecommunication Union Radio Regulation S1.22. Pegasus advises the Commission that it may also use optical links. Pegasus Application at p. 9. See Pegasus Application at p. 2. A transponder is a combination of receivers, filters, frequency converters, and transmitters to form a signal repeater. See Pegasus Application at p. 27. See Pegasus Clarification Letter dated June 22, 2001 Id. For a detailed discussion of spectrum
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-221A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-221A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-221A1.txt
  • Authorization (see 47 C.F.R. § 1.4(b)(2)). FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Donald Abelson Chief, International Bureau The Ka-band refers to the Earth-to-space (uplink) frequencies at 27.5-30.0 GHz and the correspondingearth-to-space(uplink) frequencies at 27.5-30.0 GHz. space-to-Earth (downlink) frequencies at 17.7-20.2 GHz. ISLs are communication links between in-orbit satellites. ISLs operate in spectrum allocated to the inter-satellite service. International Telecommunication Union (``ITU'') Radio Regulation S1.22. See In the Matter of Lockheed Martin Corporation Application for Authority to Construct, Launch, and Operate a Ka-band Satellite System in the Fixed Satellite Service and a Ku-band Broadcast Communications Satellite System, 12 FCC Rcd 23014 (Int'l Bur. 1997) (``Astrolink Authorization Order''). On November 18, 1999, Lockheed amended its application to reflect a change in ownership of the licensee. See
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-222A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-222A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-222A1.txt
  • Operate a Ka-band Satellite System in the Fixed-Satellite Service, 12 FCC Rcd 23001 (1997) (``Motorola Authorization Order''). The term "Ka-band" refers to the space-to-earth (downlink) frequencies at 17.7-20.2 GHz and the corresponding earth-to-space (uplink) frequencies at 27.5-30.0 GHz. ISLs are communication links between in-orbit satellites. ISLs operate in spectrum allocated to the inter-satellite service. International Telecommunication Union (``ITU'') Radio Regulation S1.22. Motorola Authorization Order. On July 10, 1998, the Commission granted pro forma assignment of licenses from Comm, Inc. to Motorola, Inc. See Letter to Counsel for Motorola from Thomas S. Tycz, Chief, Satellite and Radiocommunication Division, International Bureau (July 10, 1998). See also Letter from Counsel for Motorola to Chief, Satellite & Radiocommunication Division (dated July 22, 1998) reporting consummation
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-222A1_Erratum.doc
  • Operate a Ka-band Satellite System in the Fixed-Satellite Service, 12 FCC Rcd 23001 (1997) (``Motorola Authorization Order''). The term "Ka-band" refers to the space-to-earth (downlink) frequencies at 17.7-20.2 GHz and the corresponding earth-to-space (uplink) frequencies at 27.5-30.0 GHz. ISLs are communication links between in-orbit satellites. ISLs operate in spectrum allocated to the inter-satellite service. International Telecommunication Union (``ITU'') Radio Regulation S1.22. Motorola Authorization Order. On July 10, 1998, the Commission granted pro forma assignment of licenses from Comm, Inc. to Motorola, Inc. See Letter to Counsel for Motorola from Thomas S. Tycz, Chief, Satellite and Radiocommunication Division, International Bureau (July 10, 1998). See also Letter from Counsel for Motorola to Chief, Satellite & Radiocommunication Division (dated July 22, 1998) reporting consummation
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-223A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-223A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-223A1.txt
  • of this Order and Authorization (see 47 C.F.R. § 1.4(b)(2)). FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Donald Abelson Chief, International Bureau The Ka-band refers to the Earth-to-space (uplink) frequencies at 27.5-30.0 GHz and the corresponding space-to-Earth (downlink) frequencies at 17.7-20.2 GHz. ISLs are communication links between in-orbit satellites. ISLs operate in spectrum allocated to the inter-satellite service. International Telecommunication Union (``ITU'') Radio Regulation S1.22. TT&C communications provide data on a satellite's functions via a two-way telemetry link between the satellite and a controlling earth station, or control center. TT&C communications are used throughout the satellite's life, including the launch and deployment phase, to monitor the health of the spacecraft. The TT&C function allows the earth station to control the satellite's physical orbital position and
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-224A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-224A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-224A1.txt
  • Operate a Ka-band Satellite System in the Fixed-Satellite Service, 13 FCC Rcd 5664 (1997) (``EchoStar Authorization Order''). The term "Ka-band" refers to the space-to-earth (downlink) frequencies at 17.7-20.2 GHz and the corresponding earth-to-space (uplink) frequencies at 27.5-30.0 GHz. ISLs are communication links between in-orbit satellites. ISLs operate in spectrum allocated to the inter-satellite service. International Telecommunication Union (``ITU'') Radio Regulation S1.22. See generally EchoStar Authorization Order. EchoStar Authorization Order, 13 FCC Rcd 5664 at ¶ 3. These are the 121º W.L. and 83º W.L. orbital locations. EchoStar Authorization Order, 13 FCC Rcd 5664 at ¶¶ 15 and 18. EchoStar Authorization Order, 13 FCC Rcd 5664 at ¶ 24. See United States Proposals for the Work of the [WRC-97] Conference, Document USWRC-97.10-E,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-225A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-225A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-225A1.txt
  • of this Order (see 47 C.F.R. § 1.4(b)(2)). FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Donald Abelson Chief, International Bureau The term "Ka-band" generally refers to the space-to-earth (downlink) frequencies at 17.7-20.2 GHz and the corresponding earth-to-space (uplink) frequencies at 27.5-30.0 GHz. ISLs are communication links between in-orbit satellites. ISLs operate in spectrum allocated to the inter-satellite service. International Telecommunication Union (``ITU'') Radio Regulation S1.22. See In the Matter of GE Americom Communications Galaxy Inc. Application for Authority to Construct, Launch, and Operate a Ka-band Satellite System in the Fixed Satellite Service, 12 FCC Rcd 6475 (1997) (``GE Americom Authorization Order''). See GE Americom Authorization Order, 12 FCC Rcd 6475 at ¶ 3. These locations are the 17º W.L., 85º W.L., 105º W.L., 114.5º E.L.,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-226A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-226A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-226A1.txt
  • Service and a Ku-band Broadcast Communications Satellite System, 13 FCC Rcd 1351 (1997) (``Hughes Authorization Order''). The term "Ka-band" generally refers to the space-to-earth (downlink) frequencies at 17.7-20.2 GHz and the corresponding earth-to-space (uplink) frequencies at 27.5-30.0 GHz. ISLs are communication links between in-orbit satellites. ISLs operate in spectrum allocated to the inter-satellite service. International Telecommunication Union (``ITU'') Radio Regulation S1.22. Hughes Authorization Order, 13 FCC Rcd 1351. In the Authorization Order, we granted Hughes licenses for twenty GSO FSS satellites at 15 orbit locations. As the result of a subsequent merger between Hughes and PanAmSat Corporation (``PAS''), Hughes assigned the licenses associated with seven orbit locations to PAS. See letter from John P. Janka to Secretary, FCC (June 9,1997). See
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-227A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-227A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-227A1.txt
  • of this Order and Authorization (see 47 C.F.R. § 1.4(b)(2)). FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Donald Abelson Chief, International Bureau The Ka-band refers to the Earth-to-space (uplink) frequencies at 27.5-30.0 GHz and the corresponding space-to-Earth (downlink) frequencies at 17.7-20.2 GHz. ISLs are communication links between in-orbit satellites. ISLs operate in spectrum allocated to the inter-satellite service. International Telecommunication Union (``ITU'') Radio Regulation S1.22. Orion Network Systems, Inc., Order and Authorization, 12 FCC Rcd 23027 (Int'l Bur. 1997) (``Orion Network License''); Orion Atlantic, L.P., Order and Authorization, 13 FCC Rcd 1416 (Int'l Bur. 1997) (``Orion Atlantic License''). In the Orion Network License, the 78° E.L. orbit location was inadvertently referred to as 78° W.L. Compare Orion Network License, 12 FCC Rcd at 23077 ¶
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-228A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-228A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-228A1.txt
  • of this Order and Authorization (see 47 C.F.R. § 1.4(b)(2)). FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Donald Abelson Chief, International Bureau The Ka-band refers to the Earth-to-space (uplink) frequencies at 27.5-30.0 GHz and the corresponding space-to-Earth (downlink) frequencies at 17.7-20.2 GHz. ISLs are communication links between in-orbit satellites. ISLs operate in spectrum allocated to the inter-satellite service. International Telecommunication Union (``ITU'') Radio Regulation S1.22. See In the Matter of Hughes Communication Galaxy, Inc. Application for Authority to Construct, Launch, and Operate a Ka-band Satellite System in the Fixed Satellite Service and a Ku-band Broadcast Communications Satellite System, 13 FCC Rcd. 1351 (Int'l Bur. 1997) (``Authorization Order''). Authorization Order at 1358-59, ¶¶18,20. In its Ka-band application, Hughes also requested authority to provide service in additional
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-229A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-229A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-229A1.txt
  • Chief, Satellite and Radiocommunication Division, to Mark A. Grannis, Counsel to Teledesic LLC (January 26, 1998). The term "Ka-band" generally refers to the space-to-earth (downlink) frequencies at 17.7-20.2 GHz and the corresponding earth-to-space (uplink) frequencies at 27.5-30.0 GHz. ISLs are communication links between in-orbit satellites. ISLs operate in spectrum allocated to the inter-satellite service. International Telecommunication Union (``ITU'') Radio Regulation S1.22. Teledesic Authorization Order at 3160-3161, ¶16. Teledesic Modification Order at 2262-63, ¶ 3. Teledesic had originally requested and been authorized for a constellation of 840 NGSO satellites in 21 orbit planes. See Teledesic Authorization Order at 3156, ¶4. Teledesic Authorization Order at 3160-61, ¶ 16. Id. at 3161-62, ¶19. Id. at 3163-64, ¶ 21. See United States Proposals for the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-231A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-231A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-231A1.txt
  • a Ka-band Satellite System in the Fixed-Satellite Service, 13 FCC Rcd 1366 (1997) (``WB Authorization Order''). The term "Ka-band" generally refers to the space-to-earth (downlink) frequencies at 17.7-20.2 GHz and the corresponding earth-to-space (uplink) frequencies at 27.5-30.0 GHz. ISLs are communication links between in-orbit satellites. ISLs operate in spectrum allocated to the inter-satellite service. International Telecommunication Union (``ITU'') Radio Regulation S1.22. See generally WB Authorization Order. In a series of name changes and pro forma transfers of control and assignments, Ka-Star became iSky, which in turn, became Wildblue Communications, Inc. Wildblue Communications, Inc. is the parent company of WB Holdings 1 LLC. See letter from William M. Wiltshire, Counsel, WB Holdings, to Magalie Roman Salas, Secretary, Federal Communications Commission (November 3,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2614A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2614A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2614A1.txt
  • Secretary, Federal Communications Commission (June 7, 2001). Id. KaStarCom requests authority to conduct transfer orbit command functions in the 5856.5-5860 MHz and 6420.5-6424 MHz band and its telemetry functions in the 3700-3703.5 MHz bands and 4196-4199.5 MHz bands. ISLs are communication links between in-orbit satellites. ISLs operate in spectrum allocated to the inter-satellite service. See International Telecommunication Union Radio Regulation S1.22. Consolidated Reply to Oppositions of Pegasus, July 2, 1999, Consolidated Petition to Deny filed by Pegasus Development Corporation, filed May 25, 1999, Motorola's Consolidated Petition To Deny And Comments, filed May 21, 1999 and Consolidated Petitions to Dismiss, Deny or Defer of Hughes Communications Galaxy, Inc. and Hughes Communications Inc., filed May 21, 1999. Second Round GSO Assignment Order. See
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2361A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2361A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2361A1.txt
  • Interactive Multimedia Applications Reason: No regulatory impediments have been identified to terrestrial wireless interactive multimedia applications. Study groups within ITU-R may prepare relevant Questions and continue their work under the normal activities in order to examine any issues related to the deployments of terrestrial wireless interactive multimedia applications. DRAFT PROPOSAL FOR THE WORK OF THE CONFERENCE Doc. WAC/140(05.09.02) Agenda Item 1.22: To consider progress of ITU-R studies concerning future development of IMT-2000 and systems beyond IMT-2000, in accordance with Resolution 228 (WRC-2000). Background: WRC-2000 considered issues related to IMT-2000, resulting in the identification of additional spectrum for the terrestrial component of IMT-2000 in the Radio Regulations 5.317A and 5.384A. This spectrum was identified in addition to that initially identified for IMT-2000
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2512A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2512A2.txt
  • local Electronic Surveillance or other court orders, processes, or authorizations issued under U.S. federal, state, or local law for physical search or seizure, production of tangible things, or access to or disclosure of Domestic Communications, Call Associated Data, or U.S. Hosting Data, including Transactional Data or Subscriber Information. 1.21 "Party" and "Parties" have the meanings given them in the Preamble. 1.22 `Pro firma assignments" or "pro firma transfers of control" are transfers that do not involve a substantial change in ownership or control as provided by Section 63.24 of the FCC's Rules (47 C.F.R. 0 63.24). 1.23 "Sensitive Information" means information that is not Classified Information regarding (a) the persons or facilities that are the subjects of Lawful U.S. Process, (b)
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3071A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3071A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3071A1.txt
  • be forwarded to the Commission via the Internet at: wrc03@fcc.gov. Comments should refer to specific proposals by document number. The deadline for comments on the draft proposals and NTIA letters is December 2, 2002. I. Informal Working Group 1: IMT-2000 and Terrestrial Wireless Interactive Media DRAFT PROPOSAL FOR THE WORK OF THE CONFERENCE Doc. WAC/163(31.10.02) Resolution 228 WRC-03 Agenda Item 1.22: To consider progress of ITU-R studies concerning future development of IMT-2000 and systems beyond IMT-2000, in accordance with Resolution 228 (WRC-2000). Background: Resolution 228 (WRC-2000), which is related to Agenda Item 1.22, invites ITU-R to continue studies on overall objectives, applications and technical and operational implementation for the future development of IMT-2000 and systems beyond. ITU-R Working Party 8F has
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-407A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-407A1.txt
  • be forwarded to the Commission via the Internet at: wrc03@fcc.gov. Comments should refer to specific proposals by document number. The deadline for comments on the views and draft proposals included in this public notice is March 15, 2002. 3 I.Informal Working Group 1: IMT-2000 and Terrestrial Wireless Interactive Media REVISED DRAFT PRELIMINARY VIEW ON WRC-03 Doc. WAC/014rev1(06.02.02) WRC-2003 Agenda Item 1.22: to consider progress of ITU-R studies concerning future development of IMT-2000 and systems beyond IMT-2000, in accordance with Resolution 228 (WRC-2000). ISSUE: To study spectrum requirements and potential frequency ranges suitable for the future development of IMT-2000 and systems beyond IMT-2000, and in what time frame such spectrum would be needed, as well as ongoing enhancements of IMT-2000 systems and
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3121A3.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3121A3.txt
  • operations --p~ans;-groeesses-d~roeedures;.-the---~--- linkages (for service off load or administrative activities) to other domestic and international carriers, ISPs and other critical infrastructures; descriptions of IP networks and operations processes and procedures for management control ad relation to the backbone infiastructure(s) including other service providers; description of any unique/proprietary control mechanisms as well as operating and administrative software; and network performance information. 1.22. subsidiaries and affiliates. `New GX" means GC Acquisition Limited, a Bermuda corporation, and its 1.23. `New GX Board" means the board of directors of New GX 1.24. "OPM" means the Office of Personnel Management of the U.S. Government. 1.25. "Party" and "Parties" have the meanings given them in the Preamble. 1.26. not involve a substantial change in ownership or control
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3428A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3428A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3428A1.txt
  • (March 27, 2003). For purposes of this order, the term ``Ka-band'' or ``28 GHz band'' refers to the space-to-Earth communications (downlink) in radio frequencies at 17.7-20.2 GHz and the corresponding Earth-to-space communications (uplink) in frequencies at 27.5-30.0 GHz. ISLs are communication links between in-orbit satellites. ISLs operate in spectrum allocated to the inter-satellite service. International Telecommunication Union (``ITU'') Radio Regulation S1.22. KaStarCom subsequently surrendered this license. See Letter from David M. Drucker, President, Televerde Communications Corp., to Marlene H. Dortch, Secretary, Federal Communications Commission (dated March 7, 2003). KaStarCom. World Satellite, LLC, Application for Authority to Construct, Launch and Operate a Ka-band Satellite in the Fixed Satellite Service, Order and Authorization, DA 01-2614, 16 FCC Rcd 20133 (Int'l Bur. rel. November
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-91A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-91A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-91A1.txt
  • done and with no new allocations needed, the Resolution should be suppressed. ___________ DRAFT PROPOSAL FOR THE WORK OF THE CONFERENCE Doc. WAC/171(08.01.03) (This contains formatting and editorial changes proposed by NTIA to draft proposals from Informal Working Group 1 that appeared in Public Notices DA 02-2361, Released September 24, 2002 and DA 02-3071, Released November 8, 2002.) Agenda Item 1.22: to consider progress of ITU-R studies concerning future development of IMT-2000 and systems beyond IMT-2000, in accordance with Resolution 228 (WRC-2000); Background Information: WRC-2000 considered issues related to IMT-2000, resulting in the identification of additional spectrum for the terrestrial component of IMT-2000 in the Radio Regulations 5.317A and 5.384A. This spectrum was identified in addition to that initially identified for
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2668A2.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2668A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2668A2.txt
  • to the backbone infrastructure(s) including other service providers; description of any unique or proprietary control mechanisms as well as operating and administrative software; and network performance information. 1.20 ``Outsourcing Contract'' means a contract between VSNL America and an individual or entity to perform functions covered by this Agreement. 1.21 ``Party'' and ``Parties'' have the meanings given them in the Preamble. 1.22 ``Pro forma assignments'' or ``pro forma transfers of control'' are transfers that do not involve a substantial change in ownership or control as provided by Section 63.24 of the FCC's Rules (47 C.F.R. § 63.24). 1.23 ``Security Officer'' means the person designated pursuant to Section 3.10 of this Agreement. 1.24 ``Sensitive Information'' means information that is not Classified Information regarding
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-114A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-114A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-114A1.txt
  • GHZ BAND Comment Date: February 3, 2005 Reply Date: February 14, 2005 By this Public Notice, the Wireless Telecommunications Bureau seeks comment on a request by FiberTower, Inc. (FiberTower) for waiver of Sections 101.103 and 101.115 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 101.103, 101.115, to permit the use of 0.61 meter (two-feet) antennas as an optional alternative to the 1.22 meter (four-feet) antennas presently required for use in the Fixed Microwave Service in the 10.7 - 11.7 GHz (11 GHz) band. See 47 C.F.R. 101.115(b). FiberTower filed the waiver request, pursuant to Section 1.3 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.3, on October 22, 2004 seeking immediate relief pending Commission action on a petition for rulemaking that it filed
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2526A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2526A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2526A1.txt
  • an application seeking consent to the assignment of its Ka-band authorizations at 93º W.L. and 115º W.L. to Loral CyberStar LLC. See File No. SAT-ASG-20050628-00138, see also Public Notice, DA 05-2031, IB Docket No. 05-233 (July 18, 2005). ISLs are communication links between in-orbit satellites. ISLs operate in spectrum allocated to the inter-satellite service. International Telecommunications Union (``ITU'') Radio Regulation S1.22. CyberStar Licensee, LLC, Application for Modification of Authorization to Construct, Launch and Operate a Ka-band Satellite System in the Fixed Satellite Service, Order and Authorization, 16 FCC Rcd 2442 (2001) (CyberStar Milestone Order). In the same Order, the Bureau also modified CyberStar's license to allow it to change the 28º W.L. orbital location, which was assigned in CyberStar's initial authorization,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1216A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1216A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1216A1.txt
  • Wireless Telecommunications Bureau: INTRODUCTION On October 22, 2004, FiberTower, Inc. (FiberTower) requested a waiver of the technical parameters in Sections 101.103 and 101.115 of the Commission's Rules that establish interference protection for operators in the 10.7 - 11.7 GHz (11 GHz) band. Specifically, the waiver would permit the use of 0.61 meter (``two-foot'') antennas as an optional alternative to the 1.22 meter (``four-foot'') antennas that meet the existing technical parameters for Fixed Microwave Service in the 11 GHz band. We grant the waiver for the reasons, and subject to the conditions, set forth below. We find that permitting the installation of 0.61 meter antennas in the 11 GHz band will facilitate the efficient and effective use of the spectrum while the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3470A4.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3470A4.txt
  • 3,240 2.18History 170 0.11 Religious 5,704 3.84Hobbies 1,011 0.68 Special 7,308 4.91HomeGarden 12,994 8.74 Sports 11,701 7.87Infomercial 6,042 4.06 Syndicated 31,942 21.48Missing 18,586 12.50 TVMovie 1,456 0.98Movie 158 0.11 TalkShow 3,773 2.54Music 2,960 1.99 News 1,218 0.82 Other 629 0.42 Outdoor 5,877 3.95 PublicAffairs 2,230 1.50 Reality 5,236 3.52 Religious 1,750 1.18 Shopping 1,388 0.93 Sitcom 13,668 9.19 Spanish 1,817 1.22 Sports 8,468 5.69 Violent 1,298 0.87 Weather 132 0.09 Total 148,724100.00Total 148,724100.00 Source:TMSandauthorcalculations.SeeTable3forallocationofTMSProgramTypestoEstimationProgram Types(i.e.theProgramTypesusedinthisstudy).SeeTables29-31forallocationofTMSCategoriestoEstimation Categories(i.e.theCategoriesusedinthisstudy). 33 Table5:BroadcastNetworksintheEstimationDataset ProgramType Number Share MajorBroadcastNetworks ABC 183 11.56 CBS 185 11.69 NBC 187 11.81 FOX 168 10.61 CW 93 5.87 MNT 74 4.67 IndependentandPublic"Networks" IND1 86 5.43 IND2 40 2.53 IND3 20 1.26 IND4 12 0.76 IND5 9 0.57 IND6 5 0.32 IND7 3
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3470A6.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3470A6.txt
  • AM Drive -11.5482 (1.69) -0.0591 (1.25) 36.1875* (3.20) -3.2451 (-1.13) 0.000728 (1.77) 0.0621 165 Average Block, Music, AM Drive -1.0256 (0.26) -0.0159 (0.58) -7.5466 (-1.14) 1.2490 (0.74) 0.000179 (0.74) -0.0204 165 Average Block, News, AM Drive 1.0363 (0.59) 0.0070 (0.58) 3.9749 (1.38) 0.1461 (0.20) -0.000091 (-0.87) -0.0205 165 Average Block, Sports, AM Drive -1.6682 (0.50) 0.0004 (0.02) -3.9202 (-0.71) -1.7066 (-1.22) -0.000275 (-1.36) -0.0171 165 Average Block, Advertisements, Evening 0.3211 (0.13) -0.0002 (0.01) -2.0275 (-0.44) 1.6795 (1.75) -0.000020 (-0.14) -0.0221 169 Average Block, Entertainment/Leisure/DJ Banter, Evening 2.2775 (0.64) 0.0096 (0.38) -8.0704 (-1.23) -0.0114 (-0.01) -0.000050 (-0.23) -0.0090 169 Average Block, Music, Evening -8.9919* (2.08) -0.0594 (1.95) -8.0426 (-1.01) 0.1339 (0.08) -0.000068 (-0.26) -0.0053 169 Average Block, News, Evening 2.0215 (1.35) 0.0087
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3470A7.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3470A7.txt
  • entries are the estimated regression coefficient on newspaper cross-ownership from specifications (4) and (5) in Tables 2-6, after omitting the differential indicator for "cross-owned radio and newspaper." ***p<.01, **p<.05, and *p<.10. 55 Table A4: Pooled Cross-Ownership and Political News Coverage (in seconds) Estimated coefficient on cross-ownership (absolute value of t-statistic) Dependent variable (4) (5) Candidate speaking time 5.7 (1.18) 5.8 (1.22) Candidate coverage 18.3** (2.10) 16.5* (1.85) Partisan issue coverage -1.3 (0.10) -4.9 (0.40) Poll coverage 3.6 (1.41) 3.0 (1.18) Notes: Each cell entry is associated with a different regression estimate. The cell entries are the estimated regression coefficient on newspaper cross-ownership from specifications (4) and (5) in Tables 8-11, after omitting the differential indicator for "cross-owned radio and newspaper." ***p<.01,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3470A8.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3470A8.txt
  • HealthCare&SocialAssistance 23.78 68.57 7.65 71 Arts,Entertainment&Recreation 21.21 62.74 16.05 72 Accommodation&FoodServices 21.10 58.12 20.78 81 OtherServices(exceptpublic) 22.70 61.35 15.95 AllNon-FarmBusinesses 17.74 68.41 13.85 6 Table2:OwnershipbyRaceandEthnicity Percent NAICSName HispanicWhiteBlackAmIndAsian 22 Utilities 0.85 96.79 1.13 0.89 1.44 23 Construction 3.57 97.15 1.24 0.68 1.04 31-33 Manufacturing 3.57 94.57 0.72 0.48 4.09 42 WholesaleTrade 3.84 91.40 0.60 0.25 7.57 44-45 RetailTrade 3.60 89.55 1.22 0.42 8.58 48-49 Transportation&Warehousing 5.60 94.07 2.99 0.54 2.10 51 Information 2.82 93.04 2.07 0.40 4.33 515112 RadioStations 3.71 93.29 4.35 0.17 2.27 515120 TVStations 6.04 89.11 4.89 0.00 6.03 511110 NewspaperPublishers 1.58 93.50 2.44 1.00 3.24 52 FinanceandInsurance 3.03 95.39 1.70 0.38 2.54 53 RealEstate,Rental,Leasing 2.40 94.90 1.04 0.26 3.56 54 Prof.,ScientiÖc,Tech.Svcs. 2.77 93.57 1.57 0.47 4.29 55 Mgmt.ofCompanies
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-402A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-402A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-402A1.txt
  • Circulation Nov. 2004 12 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Feb. 2005 13 0.09 0.10 9.24 11.65 Nov. 2005 18 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Feb. 2006 24 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 TABLE 2 - WTLV VIEWING IN GAINESVILLE Survey Households Share Standard Net Standard Year Studied Viewing Error Weekly Error Hours Circulation Nov. 2004 12 3.43 3.55 5.53 6.49 Feb. 2005 13 1.22 0.99 13.60 12.49 Nov. 2005 18 0.17 0.16 2.12 2.28 Feb. 2006 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 TABLE 3 - WJXT VIEWING IN GAINESVILLE Survey Households Share Standard Net Standard Year Studied Viewing Error Weekly Error Hours Circulation Nov. 2004 12 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Feb. 2005 13 0.92 0.76 13.60 12.49 Nov. 2005 18 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Feb.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1994A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1994A2.txt
  • servicesintheband790-862MHz.Theworldwideintroductionofnewtelecommunications servicesinthemobileandfixedserviceallocationsinthisbandrequiresstableallocationsthatare harmonizedtothegreatestdegreepossible. 14 DOCUMENTWAC/051(Ol.09.09) UnitedStatesofAmerica DRAFTPROPOSALSFORTHEWORKOFTHECONFERENCE WRC·12AgendaItem1.19:toconsiderregulatorymeasuresandtheirrelevance,in ordertoenabletheintroductionofsoftware-definedradioandcognitiveradiosystems, basedontheresultsofITU-Rstudies,inaccordancewithResolution956(WRC·07). BACKGROUND:Resolution956(WRC-07)resolvestoinviteITU-Rtostudywhetherthereis aneedforregulatorymeasurestoenabletheintroductionofsoftware-definedradioandcognitive radiosystems. Softwaredefinedradios(SDR)andcognitiveradiosystems(CRS)aretechnologieswhichmay offerimprovedefficiencytotheoverallspectrumuseandprovideadditionalflexibilitiesto radiocommunicationservices.Theyarenotradiocommunicationservicesthemselves,butrather aretechnologiesthatmaybedeployedinradiocommunicationsystems. AnysystemthatincorporatesSDR,CRSorcombined SDRICRStechnologiesshalloperatein accordancewiththeprovisionsoftheRadioRegulationsandadministrationrulesgoverningthe useofthefrequencybandinwhichthesystemsareintendedtooperate.Todate,some administrationshaveallowedsuchsystemstooperateonalicence-exempt,non-harmful interferencebasis.IntheU.S.,theregulatorybodyhasprovidedthroughequipmentauthorization requirementsoperatingparametersfor SDRICRSdevicestoensurethatsuchdeviceswillnot causeharmfulinterferencetoallocatedradiocommunicationservices. RelevantITU-Rworkingpartiesareconductingtechnicalstudies,asnotedinResolution956 (WRC-07).TheUnitedStateswillparticipateasappropriateinthesestudies.TheUnitedStates doesnotbelievethatchangestotheRadioRegulationsareneededtoaddressthesetechnologies. Inparticular,theUnitedStatesdoesnotsupportregulatorymeasuresleadingtoallocations, includingidentificationfootnotes,forsoftware-definedradioandcognitiveradiosystems,as thesearetechnologies,eachwithitsownattributes,andnotradiocommunicationservices.With respecttothedefinitions,description,orcharacterizationofSDRorCRS,thereisnoneedto includeadefinitionofSDRorCRSintheRadioRegulations. PROPOSALS: NOC USA/AI1.19/1 ARTICLE1 Termsanddefinitions Reason:NochangestotheRadioRegulationsarenecessarytoenabletheintroductionofSDR andCRStechnologies.SDRandCRStechniquescanbeusedwitharangeoftechnologies,and inarangeoffrequencybandssubjecttoappropriateequipmentauthorizationproceduresto ensurethatauthorizeddevicesoperatewithinthelimitationsanadministrationappliestothe frequencybandsinwhichthesesystemsare permittedtooperate.Anydefinitionsdevelopedfor SDRandCRScouldbecapturedinanITU-RRecommendation. NOC USA/AI1.19/2 15 ARTICLE5 Frequencyallocations Reason:NochangestotheRadioRegulationsarenecessarytoenabletheintroductionofSDR andCRStechnologies.-SDRandCRStechniquescanbeusedwitharangeoftechnologies,and inarangeoffrequencybandssubjecttoappropriateequipmentauthorizationproceduresto ensurethatauthorizeddevicesoperatewithinthelimitationsanadministrationappliestothe frequencybandsinwhichthesesystemsarepermittedtooperate. 16 DOCUMENTWAC/052(Ol.09.09) UnitedStatesofAmerica DRAFTPROPOSALSFORTHEWORKOFTHECONFERENCE WRC-12AgendaItem1.22:toexaminetheeffectofemissionsfromshort-range devicesonradiocommunicationservices,inaccordancewithResolution 953(WRC-07). BACKGROUND:Resolution953(WRC-07)requeststheITU-RtostudyemissionsfromSRDs, inparticularRFIDs,insideandoutsidethefrequencybandsdesignatedintheRadioRegulations forISMapplicationstoensureadequateprotectionofradiocommunicationservices. TheUnitedStates,likemanyotheradministrations,hasadoptedaflexibleregulatoryregime, primarilyintheISMbands,thatsetsbasictechnicalrequirementsthatfacilitatespectrumsharing amonglicense-exemptdevices,includingshort-rangedevices,whileminimizingconstraintson productdesigns.Thetechnicalrequirementsplacedonthesedevicesensureadequateprotection ofradiocommunicationservicesoperatinginthesameoradjacentfrequencybands.Thisregime hasledtotheimplementationofavarietyofdevices,includingcordlesstelephones,wireless accesssystems,RFIDs,alarmsystemsandbabymonitors. Short-rangedeviceshavebeenstudiedbytheITU-Randtheresultsarecontainedin RecommendationITU-RSM.1538-2.ThisRecommendationprovidesdescriptionsofshort rangedeviceapplications,commonfrequencyrangesandregulatoryregimesadoptedbyseveral Administrations. TheUnitedStatesbelievesthattheregulationofshort-rangedevicesisprimarilyanationalmatter andthatthereisnoneedforanymodificationstotheinternationalRadioRegulationsto accommodatethesedevices. PROPOSALS: NOC USA! AI1.22/1 ARTICLE5 Frequencyallocations SectionIV-TableofFrequencyAllocations (SeeNo.2.1) Reason:Theregulationofshort-rangedevicesisprimarilyanationalmatteranddoesnotrequireany modificationstotheRadioRegulations.Thereisnoneedforinternationalregulationofsuchdevices. Technicalaspectsofthesedevices,includingfacilitatingharmonizationoffrequencybands,canbe coveredinITU-RRecommendations. 17 DOCUMENTWAC/053(Ol.09.09) UNITEDSTATESOFAMERICA DRAFTPROPOSALSFORTHEWORKOFTHECONFERENCE (Editorialnotes:RedlineinBackgroundsectionisagainsttheNTIAdraftproposal. RedlineintheProposalsectionisagainstthe2008EditionoftheRadioRegulationsandis offeredasasubstitutefortheNTIAProposalsection.) AgendaItem1.23:toconsideranallocationofabout15kHzinpartsoftheband415-526.5kHz totheamateurserviceonasecondarybasis,takingintoaccounttheneedtoprotectexisting services BackgroundInformation:Thespectrumbetween415-526.5kHziscurrentlyallocatedto themaritimemobileandaeronauticalradiolocationservices,withsomevariancesinthe allocationsamongthethreeITURegions.Themaritimemobileserviceisaprimaryuserofthe frequencybandundercOflsiderationforthisagendaitem.FootnoteNo. 5.82Aadvises,"Theuse oftheband495-505kHzislimitedtoradiotelegraphy."FootnoteNo. 5.82Badvises, "Administrationsauthorizingtheuseoffrequenciesintheband495-505kHzbyservicesother thanthemaritimemobileserviceshallensurethatnoharmfulinterferenceiscausedtothe maritimemobileserviceinthisbandortotheserviceshavingallocationsintheadjacentbands, notinginparticulartheconditionsofuseofthefrequencies490kHzand518kHz,asprescribed in Articles 31and52."NAVTEXservicesoperateon490kHzand518kHzperResolution339 (Rev.WRC-07).Thereisacommonprimarymobileserviceallocationacrossallthree Regionsintheband495-505kHz. InRegion2,theprimarymobileserviceallocation extendsto510kHz. Theband495505I(Hzprovidesinternationalharmonizationandnecessarymaritimepropagatiofl
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1994A3.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1994A3.txt
  • Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit ATTACHMENT2 toFCCPublicNoticeDA09·1994 DraftProposalsformulatedandapprovedwithintheNational TelecommunicationsandInformationAdministration: DocumentWAC/037(OI.09.09) Mr.JohnGiusti ActingChiefoftheInternationalBureau FederalCommunicationsCommission 44512'1.StreetSW Washington,DC20554 DearMr.Giusti: TheNationalTelecommunicationsandInformationAdministration(NTIA),onbehalfofthe ExecutiveBranchAgencies,approvethereleaseofthreedraftExecutiveBranchproposalfor WRC-IIagendaitems 1.5,1.19and1.22. TIAdevelopedanewresolutiontosupportagendaitem1.5.Thisresolutionprovidesa mechanismtorationalizeelectronicnewsgathering(ENG)spectrumusagebymaintaininga databaseofcountryspecificENGbandswithrequiredtechnicalandoperationalrequirementsfor deployment.NTlAproposesnochange(NOC)foragendaitemI.L9.Softwaredefinedradio andcognitiveradiosystemtechnologiescanbeintroducedwithoutchangestotheInternational TelecommunicationUnion(ITU)RadioRegulations.NTlAalsoproposesnochange(NOC)for agendaitem 1.22.Short-rangedeviceusagedoesnotrequirechangestotheITURadio Regulations. ThesedraftproposalsconsidertheFederalagencies'inputtowardthedevelopmentofU.S. ProposalsforWRC-Il.Thispackageisforwardedforyourconsiderationandreviewbyyour WRC-IIAdvisoryCommittee.Dr.DarleneDrazenovichitheprimarycontactfrommystaff. Sincerely, (OriginalSignedJuly 22,2009) KarlB.Nebbia AssociateAdministrator OfficeofSpectrumManagement Enclosures 2 UNITEDSTATESOFAMERICA DRAFTPROPOSALSFORTHEWORKOFTHECONFERENCE AgendaItem 1.5:Toconsiderworldwide/regionalharmonizationofspectrum.forelectronic newsgathering(ENG),takingintoaccounttheresultsofITU-Rstudiesinaccordancewith Resolution954(WRC-07) BackgroundInformation:WRC-07establishedResolution954(WRC-07),which"invitesITU-Rto carryoutstudieofENGregardingpossiblesolutionsforglobal/regionalharmonizationinfrequency bandsandtuningranges,takingintoaccount:availabletechnologiestomaximizeefficientandnexible useoffrequency;systemcharacteristicsandoperationalpracticeswhichfacilitatetheimplementationof thesesolutions."Resolution954(WRC·07)callsforstudiestodeterminetowhatextentharmonization ofspectrumcanbeachievedforENGservices. TheCOJ1tentsofReportITU-RBT.2069makeitclearthatfourdistinctcategoriesofENGapplications existinsupportofthebroadcastingservice.ITheharmonizationandrationalizationofspectrumforeach oftheseapplicationsshouldbeconsideredseparately,astheirspectrumrequirementsaredistinctly different,andrhepotentialforspectrumre-useisalsodistinctlyunique. Speclrumharmonizationprovidesmanybenefitsbutmaynotbefeasiblegiventhedisparateuseof spectrumbyIhemanycountriesandthedifferingbroadcastingstandardsinuseinthethreeITURegions. Instead,amechanismforspectrumrationalizationmaybemoreproductiveinallowingforeign broadcaster'sknowledgeofandaccessto,theneededspectruminagivencountry/regiontoensurethat internationalnews-worthyeventcanbecovered. Proposal: ADD USNAI1.5/1 DRAFfRESOLUTION[USA-1.5-ENG](WRC-II) SpectrumManagementGuidelinesforElectronicNewsGathering(ENG)2 TheWorldRadiocommunicationConference(Geneva,2011), considering thatsomeadministrationsmayhavedifferentoperationalneedsandspectrumrequirementsfor electronicnewsgathering,dependingonthecircumstances; IThefourcategoriesofapplications(FieldUsc,FieldTransmission,FleelTransmission,andMobileRepealers)arc ageneralizationofthespeeiJieapplie.tionsfoundinSeclion3.1onpage5ofReportlTU-RBT.2069-1. 2ForthepurposeofthisResolution,ENGrepresentsallapplicalionsancillarytobroadcasting,suchasterrestrial electronicnewsgathering,electronicfieldproduction,TVoutsidebroadcasting,wirelessradiomicrophones,and radiooutsideproductionandbroadcasl. 3 recogllizillB a) thatbroadcastingancillaryservicescanbeutilizedaspartofanadministration's telecommunicationslinformationandcommunicationtechnologies(leT)ystemsinserviceof managementinemergencyanddisastersituationsforearlywarning,prevention,mitigation,and relief; b) thatRecommendationITU-RM.1824providessystemcharacteristicsoftelevision outsidebroadcast,electronicnewsgathering(ENG)andelectronicfieldproduction(EFP)inthe mobileerviceforuseinsharingstudies; c) thatRecommendationITU-RF.1777providessystemcharacteristicsoftelevisionoutside
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-763A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-763A2.txt
  • the key technical characteristics, requirements, performance, and benefits to the various ITU-R services. As these technologies may also be implemented in license exempt devices, which operate on a non-interference, no protection from interference basis, after being authorized by an administrationbe used in conjunction with unlicensed/short range device (SRD) systems, it may be important to follow studies on WRC-11 agenda item 1.22 on short-range device SRD systems. (August 7, 2008) 21 Document WAC/027(31.03.09) IWG-2 Views A and B on the US Preliminary View on Agenda Item 1.20 Agenda Item 1.20: To consider the results of ITU-R studies and spectrum identification for gateway links for high altitude platform stations (HAPS) in the range between 5 850-7 075 MHz in order to support operations
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-763A3.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-763A3.txt
  • 1 and 3); g) Agenda Item 1.19 (Resolution 956 (WRC-07) ­ Regulatory measures and their relevance to enable the introduction of software-defined radio and cognitive radio systems); h) Agenda Item 1.20 (Resolution 734 (WRC-07) ­ Studies for spectrum identification for gateway links for high-altitude platform stations in the range from 5 850 to 7 075 MHz); and i) Agenda Item 1.22 (Resolution 953 (WRC-07) ­ Protection of radiocommunication services from emissions by short-range radio devices). This preliminary view only addresses the first part of the agenda item (passive services between 275 ­ 3 000 GHz), hereafter referred to as Agenda Item 1.6 (Res 950). The second part of the agenda item (free- space optical links), referred to as Agenda Item 1.6
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-447A3.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-447A3.txt
  • 10.7-12.75 GHz, 17.8-18.6 GHz, and 19.7-20.2 GHz where epfd limits apply NOC ANNEX 1 NOC RES 63 (Rev.WRC-07) Protection of radiocommunication services against interference caused by radiation from industrial, scientific and medical (ISM) equipment MOD May require consequential revision. Draft CPM text for this AI has a suggested revision to this Resolution (See page 4 of Doc. 1A/311, Annex 7.) 1.22 RES 72 (Rev.WRC-07) World and Regional preparations for world radiocommunication conferences NOC RES 73 (Rev.WRC-2000) Measures to solve the incompatibility between the broadcasting-satellite service in Region 1 and the fixed-satellite service in Region 3 in the frequency band 12.2-12.5 GHz NOC RES 74 (Rev.WRC-03) Process to keep the technical bases of Appendix 7 current NOC On-going consideration in SGs 1
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-447A3_Rcd.pdf
  • omm unication services agai nst interfe rence cause d by ra diation from industrial, scientific and m edical (ISM ) equi pment M OD May require c onse que ntial re vision. Dra ft CPM text for this AI has a su gge sted revisi on to this Resoluti on (See page 4 of Doc. 1A/ 311, An nex 7.) 1.22 RES 72 (Rev .WRC-07 ) Wo rld an d Reg ional pr epar atio ns fo r world ra dioc omm unication c onfere nces NOC RES 73 (Rev .WRC-200 0) M easu res to solv e th e incom patibility between the broadcasting-sat ellite service i n Region 1 and the fixed-satellite service i n Reg ion 3 in
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-2A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-2A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-2A1.txt
  • 210 1.10 1.10 1.20 211 - 220 0.50 1.10 0.80 221 - 230 1.00 0.90 1.10 231 - 240 0.90 1.00 1.80 241 - 250 1.40 1.40 1.00 251 - 260 0.90 1.70 1.40 261 - 270 0.70 2.10 2.30 271 - 280 0.40 0.50 0.30 281 - 290 1.00 1.20 1.40 > 290 0.50 1.18 0.67 > 200 0.85 1.22 1.20 Table 3 presents additional information on the distribution of LPFM stations within markets. As demonstrated, about one-third of markets do not have any LPFM stations. In 2005, over 88 percent of the Arbitron Metros had less than 3 LPFM stations physically located in the market. In 2007 and 2009, it was still the case that more than 80 percent
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-215526A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-215526A1.txt
  • 1.70 2.00 2.12 2.15 2.29 2.31 2.41 2.40 2.42 2.39 2.48 2.57 Total Monthly Charge $17.70 $18.18 $18.11 $19.05 $19.24 $19.77 $19.72 $19.95 $19.81 $20.01 $19.95 $19.88 $19.76 $19.93 $20.78 Basic Connection Charge $45.63 $44.04 $42.94 $43.06 $43.06 $42.00 $41.50 $41.38 $41.28 $40.91 $41.11 $41.04 $41.24 $41.26 $41.45 Additional Connection Charge for Touch-Tone Service 1.34 1.31 1.55 1.76 1.77 1.27 1.22 1.23 0.85 0.23 0.23 0.17 0.12 0.12 0.12 Taxes, 911, and Other Charges 2.28 2.20 2.11 2.44 2.32 2.30 2.29 2.30 2.33 2.44 2.36 2.46 2.38 2.57 2.53 Total Connection Charge $49.25 $47.55 $46.60 $47.26 $47.15 $45.57 $45.01 $44.92 $44.46 $43.58 $43.70 $43.67 $43.74 $43.95 $44.10 Additional Charge if Drop Line and Connection Block Needed NA NA $6.04 $6.07 $6.89
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-226838A8.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-226838A8.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-226838A8.txt
  • BB/EZ 7 0.13 B/T 6 0.1 BB/FS 5 0.09 BB 315 4.99 BB/O 1 0.02 BB/EZ 3 0.05 Country (C) 772 14.1 BB/REL 1 0.02 C/FS 20 0.37 BB/T 1 0.02 CHR 488 8.91 C 904 14.32 CHR/AC 15 0.27 C/FS 14 0.22 CHR/Spanish (SP) 3 0.05 CHR 410 6.49 CHR/Urban (U) 9 0.16 CHR/AC 51 0.81 Classical (CL) 67 1.22 CHR/NR 9 0.14 Classic AOR(CL AOR) 151 2.76 CHR/U 56 0.89 Ethnic (E) 16 0.29 CL 70 1.11 Easy Listening (EZ) 2 0.04 CL AOR 284 4.5 EZ/New Age Contemp. (NAC) 1 0.02 CL HITS 83 1.31 EZ/SAC 3 0.05 E 14 0.22 FS 202 3.69 EZ 13 0.21 FS/T 41 0.75 EZ/SAC 1 0.02 G 55 1 FS 96
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-228830A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-228830A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-228830A1.txt
  • 09/06/2002 Licensee Name: QUINCY BROADCASTING CO. Requested Facility: Ch No:54 N Latitude: 39-57-3; W Longitude: 91-19-54 ERP (Average): 12 kW; HAAT: 216 meters; Antenna: DA Facility ID: 23337 Call Sign: WBNG-DT File No: BDSTA-20020822ABZ City: BINGHAMTON State: NY Grant Date: 09/06/2002 Licensee Name: SJL NORTHEAST LICENSE SUBSIDIARY, LLC Requested Facility: Ch No:7 N Latitude: 42-3-31; W Longitude: 75-57-6 ERP (Average): 1.22 kW; HAAT: 342 meters; Antenna: ND Facility ID: 23341 Call Sign: WTAJ-DT File No: BDSTA-20020822ACA City: ALTOONA State: PA Grant Date: 09/06/2002 Licensee Name: SJL NORTHEAST LICENSE SUBSIDIARY, LLC Requested Facility: Ch No:32 N Latitude: 40-34-1; W Longitude: 78-26-30 ERP (Average): 3.33 kW; HAAT: 295 meters; Antenna: DA Facility ID: 35862 Call Sign: KVOS-DT File No: BDSTA-20020826ABQ City: BELLINGHAM State:
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-249262A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-249262A1.txt
  • 1.46 1.61 1.60 1.61 1966 32.3 100.1 47.6 52.5 18.9 30.1 3.10 1.47 1.63 1.59 1.61 1967 39.7 114.2 54.6 59.6 23.4 31.8 2.88 1.38 1.50 1.36 1.45 1968 46.4 126.9 61.5 65.4 28.2 40.0 2.73 1.33 1.41 1.42 1.41 1969 64.6 172.0 82.7 89.4 38.3 51.6 2.66 1.28 1.38 1.35 1.37 1970 81.1 196.6 98.9 97.7 51.0 59.8 2.43 1.22 1.21 1.17 1.19 1971 100.9 237.4 120.7 116.6 68.4 75.1 2.35 1.20 1.16 1.10 1.13 1972 126.5 291.8 148.2 143.6 91.7 98.6 2.31 1.17 1.14 1.08 1.11 1973 159.3 364.9 184.4 180.5 111.5 120.2 2.29 1.16 1.13 1.08 1.11 1974 190.7 428.7 216.6 212.1 142.0 152.2 2.25 1.14 1.11 1.07 1.09 1975 219.4 490.2 247.4 242.9 167.0 176.9 2.23 1.13
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-255118A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-255118A1.txt
  • of surviving in any given year. 24 TABLE 7 SEMI-PARAMETRIC SURVIVAL ESTIMATES (Z-statistics in parentheses) Cox Proportional Hazard (With Stratification by Sports and Shopping Genres) Piecewise-Constant Hazard (No Stratification) Millions of Subs -0.06*** (4.96) -0.17*** (6.73) Missing Subs -0.51** (2.21) -2.10** (2.12) Vertical Integration 0.00 (0.07) -0.01 (1.15) Spinoff -1.21** (2.40) -1.50*** (2.95) Missing Vertical or Spinoff 0.26 (1.23) -0.22 (1.22) Born before 1984 -0.74 (1.62) -1.08** (2.01) Duration 2 years -1.03*** (3.91) Duration 3 years -0.93*** (3.36) Duration 4 years -0.49* (1.91) Duration 5 years -0.82** (2.43) Duration 6 years -1.92*** (3.23) Duration 7 years -0.44 (1.25) Duration 8 years -0.60 (1.36) Duration 10 years -0.47 (3.47) Duration 12 years -0.35 (0.55) Duration 13 years -1.03 (0.98) Duration 19 years
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-261024A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-261024A2.txt
  • 1.46 1.61 1.60 1.61 1966 32.3 100.1 47.6 52.5 18.9 30.1 3.10 1.47 1.63 1.59 1.61 1967 39.7 114.2 54.6 59.6 23.4 31.8 2.88 1.38 1.50 1.36 1.45 1968 46.4 126.9 61.5 65.4 28.2 40.0 2.73 1.33 1.41 1.42 1.41 1969 64.6 172.0 82.7 89.4 38.3 51.6 2.66 1.28 1.38 1.35 1.37 1970 81.1 196.6 98.9 97.7 51.0 59.8 2.43 1.22 1.21 1.17 1.19 1971 100.9 237.4 120.7 116.6 68.4 75.1 2.35 1.20 1.16 1.10 1.13 1972 126.5 291.8 148.2 143.6 91.7 98.6 2.31 1.17 1.14 1.08 1.11 1973 159.3 364.9 184.4 180.5 111.5 120.2 2.29 1.16 1.13 1.08 1.11 1974 190.7 428.7 216.6 212.1 142.0 152.2 2.25 1.14 1.11 1.07 1.09 1975 219.4 490.2 247.4 242.9 167.0 176.9 2.23 1.13
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A1.txt
  • ILECs and CETCs ...................Table 3.15 High-Cost Support Payments - Total by Study Area ..................................... Table 3.30 High-Cost Support Mechanisms ­ Monthly Support per Loop by State .............. Table 3.16 Income - Net ........................................................................................................... Table 11.5 Information for Allocating CLEC Revenues .............................................. Table 1.19 Information for Allocating Incumbent Local Exchange Revenues .....................Table 1.18 Information for Allocating Interstate Access Revenues .................................. Table 1.22 Information for Allocating Interstate Toll ...................................................Table 1.26 Information for Allocating Intrastate Access Revenues .................................. Table 1.23 Information for Allocating LEC Intrastate Toll ............................................ Table 1.24 Information for Allocating Mobile Wireless Revenues .................................. Table 1.20 Information for Allocating Non-LEC Intrastate Toll ......................................Table 1.25 Information for Allocating SLC Revenues ................................................. Table 1.21 Installation, Maintenance, and Customer Complaints ............................................ Table 9.1 Interstate Access
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A2.txt
  • ILECs and CETCs ...................Table 3.15 High-Cost Support Payments - Total by Study Area ..................................... Table 3.30 High-Cost Support Mechanisms ­ Monthly Support per Loop by State .............. Table 3.16 Income - Net ........................................................................................................... Table 11.5 Information for Allocating CLEC Revenues .............................................. Table 1.19 Information for Allocating Incumbent Local Exchange Revenues .....................Table 1.18 Information for Allocating Interstate Access Revenues .................................. Table 1.22 Information for Allocating Interstate Toll ...................................................Table 1.26 Information for Allocating Intrastate Access Revenues .................................. Table 1.23 Information for Allocating LEC Intrastate Toll ............................................ Table 1.24 Information for Allocating Mobile Wireless Revenues .................................. Table 1.20 Information for Allocating Non-LEC Intrastate Toll ......................................Table 1.25 Information for Allocating SLC Revenues ................................................. Table 1.21 Installation, Maintenance, and Customer Complaints ............................................ Table 9.1 Interstate Access
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A3.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A3.txt
  • single-line business lines) + multiline business SLC per line per month * (multiline business lines) + non-primary lines * non-primary SLC per line per month]. Allocation percentage in each state is the ratio of the state's allocation revenues to nationwide revenues. SLC revenues are determined by multiplying the allocation factor by the type of revenues (see Table 1.14). In Table 1.22, interstate access revenues and private line revenues are allocated on a state- by-state basis based on net access revenues. Gross access revenues for allocation are the product of interstate access revenues from Table 2.11 of the 2003/2004 Statistics of Communications Common Carriers and the adjustment formula presented in Table 1.17. Revenues for allocation are the difference between gross access revenues
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A4.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A4.txt
  • 6.25 10.05 7.18 Indiana 7.28 8.25 7.52 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 7.28 8.25 7.52 7.28 8.25 7.52 Iowa 5.25 8.25 7.29 0.00 3.50 0.03 0.00 1.75 0.02 5.25 10.00 7.31 5.25 13.50 7.34 Kansas 5.25 8.25 7.25 3.28 3.50 3.50 1.64 1.75 1.75 6.89 10.00 9.00 10.17 13.50 12.50 Kentucky 7.09 8.25 8.11 0.00 3.50 2.44 0.00 1.75 1.22 7.09 10.00 9.33 7.09 13.50 11.77 Louisiana 8.25 8.25 8.25 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 8.25 8.25 8.25 8.25 8.25 8.25 Maine 8.20 8.25 8.21 3.48 3.50 3.50 1.74 1.75 1.75 9.94 10.00 9.96 13.42 13.50 13.46 Maryland 7.52 8.25 7.52 0.84 3.50 3.50 0.42 1.75 1.75 7.94 10.00 9.27 8.78 13.50 12.77 Massachusetts 8.20 8.25 8.20 6.00 8.45
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A5.txt
  • CENTURYTEL OF NW ARKANSAS, LLC - RUSSELLVILLE 1.51 -0.32 1.83 -7.01 401143 C CENTURYTEL OF NW ARKANSAS, LLC-SILOAM SPRINGS 3.59 -3.97 7.88 16.90 401144 C CENTURYTEL OF CENTRAL ARKANSAS, LLC -2.24 -2.00 -0.25 -8.32 401144A C CENTURYTEL OF CENTRAL ARKANSAS, LLC -17.66 2.25 -19.47 0.00 401691 C ALLTEL ARKANSAS, INC. 1.93 -1.41 3.39 -3.68 401692 C ARKANSAS TELEPHONE COMPANY -3.32 -1.22 -2.12 -100.00 401697 C CENTRAL ARKANSAS TEL. COOP INC. -7.93 -1.62 -6.41 -15.79 401698 C CLEVELAND CTY TEL. CO. 4.95 -0.71 5.70 8.07 401699 C DECATUR TELEPHONE CO INC- ARKANSAS 2.84 0.77 2.06 -20.35 401702 C SOUTH ARKANSAS TEL. CO.,INC. 20.61 -0.78 21.57 48.45 401704 A LAVACA TELEPHONE-AR 11.02 -1.33 12.51 INFINITE 401705 C CENTURYTEL OF ARKANSAS, INC. -1.45 -0.21
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A9.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A9.txt
  • 3.03 3.94 4.12 3.97 Total Monthly Charge 17.70 18.18 18.11 19.05 19.24 19.77 19.72 19.95 19.81 20.01 19.95 19.88 19.76 19.93 20.78 22.62 24.07 24.52 24.31 Basic Connection Charge 45.63 44.04 42.94 43.06 43.06 42.00 41.50 41.38 41.28 40.91 41.11 41.04 41.24 41.26 41.45 40.02 39.83 39.22 39.26 Additional Connection Charge for Touch-Tone Service 1.34 1.31 1.55 1.76 1.77 1.27 1.22 1.23 0.85 0.23 0.23 0.17 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12 **** **** **** Taxes, 911, and Other Charges 2.28 2.20 2.11 2.44 2.32 2.30 2.29 2.30 2.33 2.44 2.36 2.46 2.38 2.57 2.53 2.81 1.33 3.32 3.32 Total Connection Charge 49.25 47.55 46.60 47.26 47.15 45.57 45.01 44.92 44.46 43.58 43.70 43.67 43.74 43.95 44.10 42.95 41.16 42.54 42.59 Additional Charge
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-266857A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-266857A1.txt
  • 4.19 Total Monthly Charge $17.70 $18.18 $18.11 $19.05 $19.24 $19.77 $19.72 $19.95 $19.81 $20.01 $19.95 $19.88 $19.76 $19.93 $20.78 $22.62 $24.07 $24.52 $24.52 $24.74 Basic Connection Charge 4 45.63 44.04 42.94 43.06 43.06 42.00 41.50 41.38 41.28 40.91 41.11 41.04 41.24 41.26 41.45 40.02 39.83 39.22 39.26 39.30 Additional Connection Charge for Touch-tone Service 1.34 1.31 1.55 1.76 1.77 1.27 1.22 1.23 0.85 0.23 0.23 0.17 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12 a4 a4 a4 a4 Taxes, 911, and Other Charges 2.28 2.20 2.11 2.44 2.32 2.30 2.29 2.30 2.33 2.44 2.36 2.46 2.38 2.57 2.53 2.81 1.33 3.32 3.44 3.41 Total Connection Charge $49.25 $47.55 $46.60 $47.26 $47.15 $45.57 $45.01 $44.92 $44.46 $43.58 $43.70 $43.67 $43.74 $43.95 $44.10 $42.95 $41.16 $42.54 $42.71
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A1.txt
  • Support Data - Percentage Changes by Study Area ...........Table 3.32 ILEC Loops - by State or Jurisdiction ..................................................... Table 3.20 ILEC Loops - by Study Area ............................................................... Table 3.34 Income - Net ........................................................................................................... Table 11.5 Information for Allocating CLEC Revenues .............................................. Table 1.19 Information for Allocating Incumbent Local Exchange Revenues .....................Table 1.18 Information for Allocating Interstate Access Revenues .................................. Table 1.22 Information for Allocating Interstate Toll ...................................................Table 1.26 Information for Allocating Intrastate Access Revenues .................................. Table 1.23 Information for Allocating LEC Intrastate Toll ............................................ Table 1.24 Information for Allocating Mobile Wireless Revenues .................................. Table 1.20 Information for Allocating Non-LEC Intrastate Toll ......................................Table 1.25 Information for Allocating SLC Revenues ................................................. Table 1.21 Installation, Maintenance, and Customer Complaints ............................................ Table 9.1 3 Index
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A2.txt
  • Support Data - Percentage Changes by Study Area ...........Table 3.32 ILEC Loops - by State or Jurisdiction ..................................................... Table 3.20 ILEC Loops - by Study Area ............................................................... Table 3.34 Income - Net ........................................................................................................... Table 11.5 Information for Allocating CLEC Revenues .............................................. Table 1.19 Information for Allocating Incumbent Local Exchange Revenues .....................Table 1.18 Information for Allocating Interstate Access Revenues .................................. Table 1.22 Information for Allocating Interstate Toll ...................................................Table 1.26 Information for Allocating Intrastate Access Revenues .................................. Table 1.23 Information for Allocating LEC Intrastate Toll ............................................ Table 1.24 Information for Allocating Mobile Wireless Revenues .................................. Table 1.20 Information for Allocating Non-LEC Intrastate Toll ......................................Table 1.25 Information for Allocating SLC Revenues ................................................. Table 1.21 Installation, Maintenance, and Customer Complaints ............................................ Table 9.1 3 Index
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A3.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A3.txt
  • single-line business lines) + multiline business SLC per line per month * (multiline business lines) + non-primary lines * non-primary SLC per line per month]. Allocation percentage in each state is the ratio of the state's allocation revenues to nationwide revenues. SLC revenues are determined by multiplying the allocation factor by the type of revenues (see Table 1.14). In Table 1.22, interstate access revenues and private line revenues are allocated on a state- by-state basis based on net access revenues. Gross access revenues for allocation are the product of interstate access revenues from Table 2.11 of the 2004/2005 Statistics of Communications Common Carriers and the adjustment formula presented in Table 1.17. Revenues for allocation are the difference between gross access revenues
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A5.txt
  • 0.29 1.67 Vermont 1.23 0.00 0.00 1.66 0.00 1.52 0.39 0.87 5.67 Virgin Islands 17.23 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 9.82 0.00 0.00 27.05 Virginia 0.05 (0.00) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.12 1.04 0.09 1.30 Washington 0.48 0.00 0.00 0.00 (0.00) 0.43 0.61 0.15 1.66 West Virginia 1.01 0.01 0.00 1.72 0.00 0.14 1.28 0.16 4.33 Wisconsin 0.67 0.03 0.08 0.00 0.01 1.22 0.01 0.56 2.57 Wyoming 3.25 0.04 0.00 3.07 0.00 2.56 1.55 1.65 12.11 Industry $0.53 $0.01 $0.00 $0.13 ($0.00) $0.51 $0.30 $0.18 $1.66 Based on 2005 support payments and reported ILEC loops and CETC loops or lines from USAC filing for the Fourth Quarter 2005. Support Term Total High Cost Support Support High Cost Support Interstate Interstate Support Notes: Details
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A9.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A9.txt
  • 4.41 4.19 Total Monthly Charge 17.70 18.18 18.11 19.05 19.24 19.77 19.72 19.95 19.81 20.01 19.95 19.88 19.76 19.93 20.78 22.62 24.07 24.52 24.52 24.74 Basic Connection Charge 45.63 44.04 42.94 43.06 43.06 42.00 41.50 41.38 41.28 40.91 41.11 41.04 41.24 41.26 41.45 40.02 39.83 39.22 39.26 39.30 Additional Connection Charge for Touch-Tone Service 1.34 1.31 1.55 1.76 1.77 1.27 1.22 1.23 0.85 0.23 0.23 0.17 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12 **** **** **** **** Taxes, 911, and Other Charges 2.28 2.20 2.11 2.44 2.32 2.30 2.29 2.30 2.33 2.44 2.36 2.46 2.38 2.57 2.53 2.81 1.33 3.32 3.44 3.41 Total Connection Charge 49.25 47.55 46.60 47.26 47.15 45.57 45.01 44.92 44.46 43.58 43.70 43.67 43.74 43.95 44.10 42.95 41.16 42.54 42.71
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-270407A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-270407A1.txt
  • 3.68 110 4 851 28 1998 24,250 4,477 14,726 0.61 3.29 64 2 921 36 1999 28,515 5,305 14,980 0.53 2.82 57 2 1,216 31 2000 30,135 5,742 14,909 0.49 2.60 33 1 1,480 251 2001 33,287 6,265 11,380 0.34 1.82 10 * 1,419 199 2002 35,064 5,926 9,956 0.28 1.64 ** ** 988 113 2003 42,664 7,350 8,944 0.21 1.22 ** ** 620 156 2004 63,553 10,895 9,178 0.14 0.84 ** ** 458 137 * Denotes revenues less than $500,000. ** Data not filed. 1 Billed revenues in Table 6.1 differ from billed revenues in Table 6.3. The amounts shown here represent charges to end-user customers and equal the amounts billed by underlying carriers plus estimated reseller markups. The amounts
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A1.txt
  • Support Data - Percentage Changes by Study Area ...........Table 3.32 ILEC Loops - by State or Jurisdiction ..................................................... Table 3.20 ILEC Loops - by Study Area ............................................................... Table 3.34 Income - Net ........................................................................................................... Table 11.5 Information for Allocating CLEC Revenues .............................................. Table 1.19 Information for Allocating Incumbent Local Exchange Revenues .....................Table 1.18 Information for Allocating Interstate Access Revenues .................................. Table 1.22 Information for Allocating Interstate Toll ...................................................Table 1.26 Information for Allocating Intrastate Access Revenues .................................. Table 1.23 Information for Allocating LEC Intrastate Toll ............................................ Table 1.24 Information for Allocating Mobile Wireless Revenues .................................. Table 1.20 3 Index of Tables and Charts Information for Allocating Non-LEC Intrastate Toll ......................................Table 1.25 Information for Allocating SLC Revenues ................................................. Table 1.21 Installation, Maintenance, and Customer
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A2.txt
  • Support Data - Percentage Changes by Study Area ...........Table 3.32 ILEC Loops - by State or Jurisdiction ..................................................... Table 3.20 ILEC Loops - by Study Area ............................................................... Table 3.34 Income - Net ........................................................................................................... Table 11.5 Information for Allocating CLEC Revenues .............................................. Table 1.19 Information for Allocating Incumbent Local Exchange Revenues .....................Table 1.18 Information for Allocating Interstate Access Revenues .................................. Table 1.22 Information for Allocating Interstate Toll ...................................................Table 1.26 Information for Allocating Intrastate Access Revenues .................................. Table 1.23 Information for Allocating LEC Intrastate Toll ............................................ Table 1.24 Information for Allocating Mobile Wireless Revenues .................................. Table 1.20 3 Index of Tables and Charts Information for Allocating Non-LEC Intrastate Toll ......................................Table 1.25 Information for Allocating SLC Revenues ................................................. Table 1.21 Installation, Maintenance, and Customer
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A3.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A3.txt
  • single-line business lines) + multiline business SLC per line per month * (multiline business lines) + non-primary lines * non-primary SLC per line per month]. Allocation percentage in each state is the ratio of the state's allocation revenues to nationwide revenues. SLC revenues are determined by multiplying the allocation factor by the type of revenues (see Table 1.14). In Table 1.22, interstate access revenues and private line revenues are allocated on a state- by-state basis based on net access revenues. Gross access revenues for allocation are the product of interstate access revenues from ARMIS Report 43-08 and the adjustment formula presented in Table 1.17. Revenues for allocation are the difference between gross access revenues for allocation and 31 See Local Telephone
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A5.txt
  • TEL. COOP. CORP., INC. 27.26 1.24 25.70 96.87 260408 A GEARHEART COMM. DBA COALFIELDS TEL. CO. 0.04 -1.18 1.24 -50.70 260411 C LESLIE COUNTY TEL. CO., INC. -8.72 0.45 -9.13 -39.71 260412 A LEWISPORT TEL. CO., INC. -2.08 -6.17 4.35 5.34 260413 C LOGAN TEL. COOP., INC. -0.63 -3.00 2.44 -1.54 260414 A MOUNTAIN RURAL TEL. COOP. CORP., INC. -0.21 -1.22 1.02 -67.56 260415 C PEOPLES RURAL TEL. COOP. CORP. 0.04 -1.57 1.63 -1.95 260417 A SALEM TEL. CO. 0.07 -1.41 1.50 -38.53 260418 C SOUTH CENTRAL RURAL TEL. COOP. CORP., INC. -0.14 -2.17 2.07 -2.05 260419 A THACKER/GRIGSBY TEL. CO., INC. 1.51 -2.39 4.00 5.83 260421 C WEST KY. RURAL TEL. COOP. CORP., INC. 9.31 -5.13 15.22 25.72 265061 C
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A9.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A9.txt
  • Total Monthly Charge 17.70 18.18 18.11 19.05 19.24 19.77 19.72 19.95 19.81 20.01 19.95 19.88 19.76 19.93 20.78 22.62 24.07 24.52 24.52 24.57 25.27 Basic Connection Charge 45.63 44.04 42.94 43.06 43.06 42.00 41.50 41.38 41.28 40.91 41.11 41.04 41.24 41.26 41.45 40.02 39.83 39.22 39.26 39.62 39.44 Additional Connection Charge for Touch-Tone Service 1.34 1.31 1.55 1.76 1.77 1.27 1.22 1.23 0.85 0.23 0.23 0.17 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12 **** **** **** **** **** Taxes, 911, and Other Charges 2.28 2.20 2.11 2.44 2.32 2.30 2.29 2.30 2.33 2.44 2.36 2.46 2.38 2.57 2.53 2.81 1.33 3.32 3.44 3.17 3.48 Total Connection Charge 49.25 47.55 46.60 47.26 47.15 45.57 45.01 44.92 44.46 43.58 43.70 43.67 43.74 43.95 44.10 42.95 41.16
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-284932A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-284932A1.txt
  • 3.68 110 4 851 28 1998 24,250 4,477 14,726 0.61 3.29 64 2 921 36 1999 28,515 5,305 14,980 0.53 2.82 57 2 1,216 31 2000 30,135 5,742 14,909 0.49 2.60 33 1 1,480 251 2001 33,287 6,265 11,380 0.34 1.82 10 * 1,419 199 2002 35,064 5,926 9,956 0.28 1.64 ** ** 988 113 2003 42,664 7,350 8,944 0.21 1.22 ** ** 743 156 2004 63,553 10,895 9,178 0.14 0.84 ** ** 574 137 2005 70,064 13,134 7,976 0.11 0.61 ** ** 628 110 2006 72,440 13,673 7,299 0.10 0.53 ** ** 678 99 * Denotes revenues less than $500,000. ** Data not filed. 1 Billed revenues in Table 6.1 differ from billed revenues in Table 6.3. The amounts shown
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-284934A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-284934A1.txt
  • 2.15 2.29 2.31 2.41 2.40 2.42 2.39 2.48 2.57 3.03 3.94 4.12 4.14 4.15 4.26 4.26 Total Monthly Charge $17.70$18.18$18.11$19.05$19.24$19.77$19.72$19.95$19.81$20.01$19.95$19.88$19.76$19.93$20.78$22.62$24.07$24.52$24.52$24.64 $25.26 $25.62 Basic Connection Charge 4 45.63 44.04 42.94 43.06 43.06 42.00 41.50 41.38 41.28 40.91 41.11 41.04 41.24 41.26 41.45 40.02 39.83 39.22 39.26 39.62 39.68 39.81 Additional Connection Charge for Touch-tone Service 1.34 1.31 1.55 1.76 1.77 1.27 1.22 1.23 0.85 0.23 0.23 0.17 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12 a4 a4 a4 a4 a4 a4 Taxes, 911, and Other Charges 2.28 2.20 2.11 2.44 2.32 2.30 2.29 2.30 2.33 2.44 2.36 2.46 2.38 2.57 2.53 2.81 1.33 3.32 3.44 3.17 3.45 3.41 Total Connection Charge $49.25$47.55$46.60$47.26$47.15$45.57$45.01$44.92$44.46$43.58$43.70$43.67$43.74$43.95$44.10$42.95$41.16$42.54$42.71$42.80 $43.13 $43.22 Additional Charge if Drop Line and Connection Block Needed a1 a1 6.04
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287688A1.pdf
  • Support Data - Percentage Changes by Study Area ...........Table 3.32 ILEC Loops - by State or Jurisdiction ..................................................... Table 3.20 ILEC Loops - by Study Area ............................................................... Table 3.34 Income - Net ........................................................................................................... Table 11.5 Information for Allocating CLEC Revenues .............................................. Table 1.19 Information for Allocating Incumbent Local Exchange Revenues .....................Table 1.18 Information for Allocating Interstate Access Revenues .................................. Table 1.22 Information for Allocating Interstate Toll ...................................................Table 1.26 Information for Allocating Intrastate Access Revenues .................................. Table 1.23 Information for Allocating LEC Intrastate Toll ............................................ Table 1.24 Information for Allocating Mobile Wireless Revenues .................................. Table 1.20 Information for Allocating Non-LEC Intrastate Toll ......................................Table 1.25 3 Index of Tables and Charts Information for Allocating SLC Revenues ................................................. Table 1.21 Installation, Maintenance, and Customer
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287688A2.pdf
  • Support Data - Percentage Changes by Study Area ...........Table 3.32 ILEC Loops - by State or Jurisdiction ..................................................... Table 3.20 ILEC Loops - by Study Area ............................................................... Table 3.34 Income - Net ........................................................................................................... Table 11.5 Information for Allocating CLEC Revenues .............................................. Table 1.19 Information for Allocating Incumbent Local Exchange Revenues .....................Table 1.18 Information for Allocating Interstate Access Revenues .................................. Table 1.22 Information for Allocating Interstate Toll ...................................................Table 1.26 Information for Allocating Intrastate Access Revenues .................................. Table 1.23 Information for Allocating LEC Intrastate Toll ............................................ Table 1.24 Information for Allocating Mobile Wireless Revenues .................................. Table 1.20 Information for Allocating Non-LEC Intrastate Toll ......................................Table 1.25 3 Index of Tables and Charts Information for Allocating SLC Revenues ................................................. Table 1.21 Installation, Maintenance, and Customer
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287688A3.pdf
  • business lines) + multiline business SLC per line per month * (multiline business lines) + non- primary lines * non-primary SLC per line per month]. Allocation percentage in each state is the ratio of the state's allocation revenues to nationwide revenues. SLC revenues are determined by multiplying the allocation factor by the type of revenues (see Table 1.14). In Table 1.22, interstate access revenues and private line revenues are allocated on a state-by-state basis based on net access revenues. Gross access revenues for allocation are the product of interstate access revenues from ARMIS Report 43-08 and the adjustment formula presented in Table 1.17. Revenues for allocation are the difference between gross access revenues for allocation and subscriber line charge revenues. Allocation
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287688A5.pdf
  • 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.30 0.25 0.07 0.64 Puerto Rico 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3.31 0.00 0.00 3.31 Rhode Island 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.01 South Carolina 0.93 0.07 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.33 0.45 0.21 2.98 South Dakota 5.38 0.33 0.02 0.33 0.00 4.46 0.00 1.98 12.50 Tennessee 0.29 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.54 0.23 0.15 1.22 Texas 0.78 0.01 (0.00) 0.00 0.00 0.46 0.30 0.13 1.68 Utah 0.44 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.75 0.18 0.33 1.72 Vermont 1.14 0.07 0.00 1.63 0.00 1.35 0.40 0.58 5.17 Virgin Islands 13.46 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 17.58 0.00 0.00 31.04 Virginia 0.05 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.12 0.90 0.08 1.16 Washington 0.52 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.58 0.44 0.14
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287688A7.pdf
  • 30, 2008. Because of the appeals process, funding commitments and disbursements may be made after the program year ended. 5 - 11 USAC Disbursements Disbursements State or on Behalf of Rural Population in Per Person in Jurisdiction Health Care Providers Rural Areas1 Rural Areas Alabama $308 1,407 $0.22 Alaska 21,320 367 58.15 American Samoa 0 57 0.00 Arizona 1,166 954 1.22 Arkansas 43 1,435 0.03 California 466 2,521 0.18 Colorado 125 777 0.16 Connecticut 0 334 0.00 Delaware 0 157 0.00 District of Columbia 0 0 NA Florida 112 1,427 0.08 Georgia 524 2,520 0.21 Guam 0 155 0.00 Hawaii 188 335 0.56 Idaho 108 862 0.13 Illinois 463 1,878 0.25 Indiana 102 1,691 0.06 Iowa 275 1,600 0.17 Kansas 437
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287688A9.pdf
  • $17.70 $18.18 $18.11 $19.05 $19.24 $19.77 $19.72 $19.95 $19.81 $20.01 $19.95 $19.88 $19.76 $19.93 $20.78 $22.62 $24.07 $24.52 $24.52 $24.64 $25.26 $25.62 Basic Connection Charge 4 45.63 44.04 42.94 43.06 43.06 42.00 41.50 41.38 41.28 40.91 41.11 41.04 41.24 41.26 41.45 40.02 39.83 39.22 39.26 39.62 39.68 39.81 Additional Connection Charge for Touch-tone Service 1.34 1.31 1.55 1.76 1.77 1.27 1.22 1.23 0.85 0.23 0.23 0.17 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12 a4 a4 a4 a4 a4 a4 Taxes, 911, and Other Charges 2.28 2.20 2.11 2.44 2.32 2.30 2.29 2.30 2.33 2.44 2.36 2.46 2.38 2.57 2.53 2.81 1.33 3.32 3.44 3.17 3.45 3.41 Total Connection Charge $49.25 $47.55 $46.60 $47.26 $47.15 $45.57 $45.01 $44.92 $44.46 $43.58 $43.70 $43.67 $43.74 $43.95 $44.10
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A1.txt
  • Jurisdiction Table 3.18 ILEC High-Cost Loop Support Data - Percentage Changes by Study Area ...........Table 3.32 ILEC Loops - by State or Jurisdiction ..................................................... Table 3.20 ILEC Loops - by Study Area ............................................................... Table 3.34 Information for Allocating CLEC Revenues .............................................. Table 1.19 Information for Allocating Incumbent Local Exchange Revenues .....................Table 1.18 Information for Allocating Interstate Access Revenues .................................. Table 1.22 Information for Allocating Interstate Toll ...................................................Table 1.26 Information for Allocating Intrastate Access Revenues .................................. Table 1.23 Information for Allocating LEC Intrastate Toll ............................................ Table 1.24 Information for Allocating Mobile Wireless Revenues .................................. Table 1.20 Information for Allocating Non-LEC Intrastate Toll ......................................Table 1.25 Information for Allocating SLC Revenues ................................................. Table 1.21 Installation, Maintenance, and Customer Complaints ............................................ Table 9.1 Interstate Access
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A2.txt
  • Jurisdiction Table 3.18 ILEC High-Cost Loop Support Data - Percentage Changes by Study Area ...........Table 3.32 ILEC Loops - by State or Jurisdiction ..................................................... Table 3.20 ILEC Loops - by Study Area ............................................................... Table 3.34 Information for Allocating CLEC Revenues .............................................. Table 1.19 Information for Allocating Incumbent Local Exchange Revenues .....................Table 1.18 Information for Allocating Interstate Access Revenues .................................. Table 1.22 Information for Allocating Interstate Toll ...................................................Table 1.26 Information for Allocating Intrastate Access Revenues .................................. Table 1.23 Information for Allocating LEC Intrastate Toll ............................................ Table 1.24 Information for Allocating Mobile Wireless Revenues .................................. Table 1.20 Information for Allocating Non-LEC Intrastate Toll ......................................Table 1.25 Information for Allocating SLC Revenues ................................................. Table 1.21 Installation, Maintenance, and Customer Complaints ............................................ Table 9.1 Interstate Access
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A3.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A3.txt
  • business lines) + multiline business SLC per line per month * (multiline business lines) + non- primary lines * non-primary SLC per line per month]. Allocation percentage in each state is the ratio of the state's allocation revenues to nationwide revenues. SLC revenues are determined by multiplying the allocation factor by the type of revenues (see Table 1.14). In Table 1.22, interstate access revenues and private line revenues are allocated on a state-by-state basis based on net access revenues. Gross access revenues for allocation are the product of interstate access revenues from ARMIS Report 43-08 and the adjustment formula presented in Table 1.17. Revenues for allocation are the difference between gross access revenues for allocation and subscriber line charge revenues. Allocation
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A5.txt
  • TELEPHONE CO. 14.08 -4.57 19.54 22.76 542343 C VOLCANO TELEPHONE COMPANY 2.70 -2.01 4.81 1.69 542344 C VERIZON WEST COAST INC.-CA 2.54 -2.61 5.29 0.00 542346 C PINNACLES TELEPHONE COMPANY -5.10 2.66 -7.56 -7.64 543402 C CITIZENS TEL CO OF GOLDEN ST DBA FRONTIER COM -5.51 -2.93 -2.66 -100.00 544342 C CITIZENS TEL CO OF TUOLUMNE DBA FRONTIER COMM -6.65 -1.22 -5.49 -70.47 545170 C PACIFIC BELL 7.30 -6.26 14.47 0.00 COLORADO TOTAL 3.20 -7.36 11.40 0.87 461835 C SUNFLOWER TELEPHONE CO.,INC. - CO -0.43 -3.98 3.69 -2.12 462178 C AGATE MUTUAL TELEPHONE COOPERATIVE ASSOC. 16.40 0.72 15.56 18.91 462181 C BIJOU TEL COOPERATIVE ASSOC. INC -1.93 -2.35 0.43 -6.35 462182 C BLANCA TELEPHONE CO. 0.40 -11.07 12.90 4.02 462184 C
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-301823A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-301823A1.txt
  • 3.68 110 4 851 28 1998 24,250 4,477 14,726 0.61 3.29 64 2 921 36 1999 28,515 5,305 14,980 0.53 2.82 57 2 1,216 31 2000 30,135 5,742 14,909 0.49 2.60 33 1 1,480 251 2001 33,287 6,265 11,386 0.34 1.82 10 * 1,419 199 2002 35,064 5,926 9,956 0.28 1.64 ** ** 988 113 2003 42,664 7,350 9,294 0.21 1.22 ** ** 8993 2004 63,553 10,895 9,176 0.14 0.84 ** ** 7113 2005 70,064 13,134 7,975 0.11 0.61 ** ** 7383 2006 72,440 13,673 7,907 0.11 0.58 ** ** 7923 2007 69,975 13,695 7,132 0.10 0.52 ** ** 7173 2008 74,934 15,028 7,305 0.10 0.49 ** ** 8173 * Denotes revenues less than $500,000. ** Data not filed. 1 Billed
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303886A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303886A1.txt
  • 8.05 10.00 9.43 8.05 13.50 11.90 Arkansas 5.25 8.25 7.43 0.00 3.50 2.14 0.00 1.75 1.07 5.25 10.00 8.50 5.25 13.50 10.64 California 3.98 8.25 6.64 3.36 3.50 3.39 1.68 1.75 1.70 5.66 10.00 8.34 9.02 13.50 11.73 Colorado 8.25 8.25 8.25 0.00 3.50 3.46 0.00 1.75 1.73 8.25 10.00 9.98 8.25 13.50 13.44 Connecticut 7.52 7.52 7.52 1.18 3.50 1.22 0.59 1.75 0.61 8.11 9.27 8.13 9.29 12.77 9.35 Delaware 8.20 8.20 8.20 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 8.20 8.20 8.20 8.20 8.20 8.20 District of Columbia 5.61 5.61 5.61 3.50 3.50 3.50 1.75 1.75 1.75 7.36 7.36 7.36 10.86 10.86 10.86 Florida 8.12 8.25 8.23 0.00 3.50 3.48 0.00 1.75 0.00 8.12 10.00 8.23 8.12 13.50 11.71 Georgia
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303886A4.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303886A4.txt
  • 8.05 10.00 9.43 8.05 13.50 11.90 Arkansas 5.25 8.25 7.43 0.00 3.50 2.14 0.00 1.75 1.07 5.25 10.00 8.50 5.25 13.50 10.64 California 3.98 8.25 6.64 3.36 3.50 3.39 1.68 1.75 1.70 5.66 10.00 8.34 9.02 13.50 11.73 Colorado 8.25 8.25 8.25 0.00 3.50 3.46 0.00 1.75 1.73 8.25 10.00 9.98 8.25 13.50 13.44 Connecticut 7.52 7.52 7.52 1.18 3.50 1.22 0.59 1.75 0.61 8.11 9.27 8.13 9.29 12.77 9.35 Delaware 8.20 8.20 8.20 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 8.20 8.20 8.20 8.20 8.20 8.20 District of Columbia 5.61 5.61 5.61 3.50 3.50 3.50 1.75 1.75 1.75 7.36 7.36 7.36 10.86 10.86 10.86 Florida 8.12 8.25 8.23 0.00 3.50 3.48 0.00 1.75 0.00 8.12 10.00 8.23 8.12 13.50 11.71 Georgia
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303886A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303886A5.txt
  • 4.17 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.97 0.23 0.23 6.59 IDAHO 2.41 0.03 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.64 1.68 0.73 6.49 ILLINOIS 0.26 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.43 0.16 0.14 1.00 INDIANA 0.52 0.03 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.64 0.42 0.19 1.80 IOWA 1.25 0.17 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.95 0.57 0.88 4.81 KANSAS 5.91 0.10 0.21 0.00 0.00 3.20 0.32 0.70 10.45 KENTUCKY 1.22 0.08 0.00 0.59 0.00 1.13 0.68 0.19 3.88 LOUISIANA 2.54 0.05 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.20 0.38 0.17 4.34 MAINE 0.42 0.03 0.00 0.18 0.00 1.22 0.00 0.60 2.46 MARYLAND 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.03 0.06 0.01 0.11 MASSACHUSETTS 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.04 0.02 0.07 MICHIGAN 0.45 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.44 0.01 0.18 1.09 MINNESOTA 1.26
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-307314A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-307314A1.pdf
  • the Enforcement Bureau's San Juan Office (``San Juan Office'') conducted an investigation in the San Juan area. On April 28, 2011 and May 5, 2011, agents from the San Juan Office confirmed by direction finding techniques that radio emissions on the frequency 5.585 GHz were emanating from the rooftop of the City View Plaza Building in Guaynabo at 18º 25' 1.22" N 66º 6' 33.09" W, the location of two of your Unlicensed National Information Infrastructure (``U-NII'') devices, Rocket M5s manufactured by Ubiquiti Networks, Inc. with FCC ID SWX-M5. On May 11, 2011 and May 16, 2011, agents from the San Juan Office confirmed by direction finding techniques that radio emissions on the frequencies 5.625 GHz and 5635 GHz were emanating
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-308828A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-308828A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-308828A1.txt
  • experienced by any one consumer in any specific market for these ISPs. Figure 2: Peak period sustained download performance, by provider Actual Sustained Speed (Mbps) Advertised Speed Tier (Mbps) Provider Actual Sustained Speed / Advertised Speed Tier 0.60 0.768 AT&T 78% % 0.69 0.768 Verizon (DSL) 89% 0.73 0.768 TimeWarner 95% 0.97 1 Verizon (DSL) 97% 1.15 1.5 Windstream 77% 1.22 1.5 Qwest 82% 1.24 1.5 AT&T 83% 1.32 1.5 Verizon (DSL) 88% 1.35 1.5 CenturyLink 90% 1.44 1 Comcast 144% 1.90 2 TimeWarner 95% 2.02 3 Frontier 67% 2.34 3 AT&T 78% 2.43 3 Verizon (DSL) 81% 2.60 3 CenturyLink 87% 2.66 3 Windstream 89% 3.20 3 Cox 107% 4.52 5 CenturyLink 90% 4.71 6 AT&T 79% 4.83 7 Qwest
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-311775A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-311775A1.txt
  • State Support2Federal Match Total Federal Support3Total Basic Federal Support1 State Support2Federal Match Total Federal Support3Total Alabama $8.25 $3.50 $1.75$10.00$13.50 $8.34 $3.49 $1.74$10.09$13.58 $8.33 $3.49 $1.75$10.07$13.56 Alaska 8.25 3.50 1.75 10.00 13.50 8.25 3.46 1.73 9.98 13.43 8.25 3.46 1.73 9.98 13.45 American Samoa 8.25 0.00 0.00 8.25 8.25 8.25 3.50 1.75 10.00 13.50 8.25 0.04 0.02 8.27 8.31 Arizona 8.01 1.22 0.61 8.62 9.84 8.25 3.50 1.75 10.00 13.50 8.14 2.42 1.21 9.34 11.76 Arkansas 7.42 2.34 1.17 8.59 10.93 7.09 3.49 1.74 8.84 12.33 7.16 3.24 1.62 8.78 12.03 California 6.60 3.42 1.71 8.31 11.74 8.03 3.50 1.75 9.78 13.28 6.61 3.43 1.71 8.32 11.75 Colorado 8.21 3.49 1.75 9.96 13.46 8.25 3.50 1.75 10.00 13.50 8.21 3.49 1.75 9.96
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-33A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-33A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-33A1.txt
  • need or prefer to employ small antennas because most potential antenna sites, such as rooftops, monopoles, and electrical transmission towers, cannot support large microwave dishes, due to either space limitations or aesthetic objections of homeowner associations or zoning boards. Our rules, however, do not permit antennas smaller than 0.61 meters (2 feet) in diameter in the 23 GHz band, or 1.22 meters (4 feet) in diameter in the 10 GHz band. TIA believes that the existing antenna size restrictions deter fixed microwave service use of these bands. It recommends permitting 0.46-meter (18-inch) or 0.30 meter (1-foot) high performance antennas in the 23 GHz band, and 0.61-meter (2-foot) or 1.22-meter (4-foot) antennas in the 10 GHz band. . To permit 0.46-meter (18-inch)
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-208A2.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-208A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-208A2.txt
  • 1.03 2.69 1.08 2.70 1.23 PO-1-01 Customer Service Record - Web GUI 2.75 5.59 2.76 3.50 2.69 1.62 2.70 3.20 PO-1-02 Due Date Availability - EDI 0.12 3.67 0.14 2.62 0.12 2.48 0.13 2.77 PO-1-02 Due Date Availability - CORBA 0.12 1.97 0.14 0.71 0.12 NA 0.13 NA PO-1-02 Due Date Availability - Web GUI 0.12 5.39 0.14 2.47 0.12 1.22 0.13 2.35 PO-1-03 Address Validation - EDI 4.72 3.65 4.46 3.67 4.48 4.29 4.33 4.93 PO-1-03 Address Validation - CORBA 4.72 2.16 4.46 2.30 4.48 2.68 4.33 2.35 PO-1-03 Address Validation - Web GUI 4.72 6.72 4.46 5.35 4.48 2.45 4.33 5.27 PO-1-04 Product & Service Availability - EDI 0.18 3.66 7.40 9.93 8.97 9.16 8.33 10.81 4a PO-1-04 Product
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-369A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-369A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-369A1.txt
  • law enforcement agency or a U.S. intelligence agency as Sensitive Information. 1.21 "Subscriber Information" means information of the type referred to and accessible subject to procedures specified in 18 U.S.C. § 2703(c) or (d) or 18 U.S.C. § 2709. Such information shall also be considered Subscriber Information when it is sought pursuant to the provisions of other Lawful U.S. Process. 1.22 "Telenor" has the meaning given to it in the Preamble. It includes all successors and assigns of Telenor. 1.23 "Telenor Broadband Services AS" or "TBS" has the meaning given to it in the Preamble, and also encompasses its directly or indirectly wholly-owned Norway-incorporated subsidiaries, Telenor Satellite Mobile Ventures AS and Telenor Satellite Mobile AS, including all of their successors, assigns
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-49A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-49A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-49A1.txt
  • (0.0181) Intercept 3.3672 (0.1954) Adjusted R Square .45 Number of Observations 718 Impact of LEC Systems -0.0937 Impact of DBS Systems 0.0820 ATTACHMENT B-5 COMPARISON OF COMPETITIVE GROUP BY TEST FOR EFFECTIVE COMPETITION WITH NONCOMPETITIVE GROUP WIRELINE OVERBUILD DBS OVERBUILD OVERBUILD† LEC LOW PENETRATION MUNICIPAL NONCOMPETITIVE GROUP 2000 Monthly Charge $33.74 $33.23 $33.65 $32.21 $31.56 $22.56 $34.11 Standard Error 0.83 1.22 .91 0.29 0.60 1.55 0.66 % Difference†† 1.1% 2.6% 1.4% 5.9%* 8.1%* 51.2%* -- Number of Channels 56.5 38.6 53.4 66.3 45.9 50.3 54.8 Standard Error 1.79 3.84 2.14 0.61 1.91 3.03 0.92 % Difference†† -3.0% 42.0%* 2.6% -17.3%* 19.4%* 8.9% -- Charge per Channel 0.62 0.96 0.68 0.49 0.74 0.46 0.66 Standard Error 0.02 0.07 0.03 0.01 0.03 0.03
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-107A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-107A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-107A1.txt
  • 0.01 0.02 0.01 -- --- No. of satellite channels 42.16 43.41 42.09 -1.33 -3.1% Standard error 0.86 1.26 0.83 -- --- Rate per satellite channel $0.797 $0.751 $0.800 $0.049 6.5% Standard error 0.02 0.04 0.02 -- --- July 1, 1999 Programming total $29.71 $27.96 $29.83 $1.87 6.7%* Standard error 0.31 0.54 0.30 -- --- Number of channels 53.66 54.81 53.59 -1.22 -2.2% Standard error 0.99 1.42 0.99 -- --- Rate per channel † $0.587 $0.549 $0.589 $0.040 7.3% Standard error 0.01 0.02 0.01 -- --- * An asterisk denotes a statistically significant difference between the competitive and noncompetitive groups. † Equals the number of channels divided by the monthly rate for programming. This average cannot be computed using the numbers in
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-118A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-118A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-118A1.txt
  • MR-4-08-5000 % Out of Service > 24 Hours 33.33 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 a,b,c,d MR-5 - Repeat Trouble Report Rates MR-5-01-5000 % Repeat Reports within 30 Days 33.33 20 33.33 0 0 0 20 0 10 6.25 a,b,c,d NETWORK PERFORMANCE NP-1 - Percent Final Trunk Group Blockage NP-1-01-5000 % Final Trunk Groups Exceeding Blocking Standard 1.22 0 1.83 0 0.62 0 0.31 0 0.65 0 NP-1-02-5000 % FTG Exceeding Blocking Std. -(No Exceptions) 3.95 5.65 1.83 1.7 0.62 1.69 0.31 1.65 0.65 1.71 NP-1-03-5000 Number FTG Exceeding Blocking Std. - 2 Months 0 0 0 0 0 NP-1-04-5000 Number FTG Exceeding Blocking Std. - 3 Months 0 0 0 0 0 NP-2 - Collocation Performance -
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-145A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-145A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-145A1.txt
  • note that Monmouth County is considered by Arbitron to be in the Monmouth-Ocean metro market as well as the New York metro market. Millennium Feb. 22, 2002 Response at 18 and DataWorld contour study (attached as Exhibit C to Millennium Feb. 22, 2002 Response). Nassau Mar. 5, 2002 Comments at 9. See Horizontal Merger Guidelines § 1.2. See id. § 1.22. We note that the Monmouth-Ocean metro is located near the Philadelphia and New York metros, two of the largest metros in the country. BIA Economic Analysis at 11. Millennium Response at 19; BIA Economic Analysis at 9-11. According to BIA, these stations are: WABC-AM and WPLJ-FM, New York, owned by ABC Radio Inc.; WOR-AM, New York, owned by Buckley Broadcasting;
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-147A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-147A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-147A1.txt
  • Comments at 11-17 (noting that BellSouth's manual loop ordering process is time consuming, error prone and costly); WorldCom GALA I Comments at 15 (asserting that BellSouth's manual processing of orders results in delays and errors). See AT&T GALA II Bursh/Norris Decl. at paras. 75-77, 119 (stating that BellSouth bases its calculations on inaccurate data and citing Varner Aff. Ex. PM-3 (F.1.22; F.1.2.5)); Network Telephone GALA II Comments at 5; Sprint GALA II Comments at 13; WorldCom GALA II Comments at 30-31; WorldCom GALA II Lichtenberg Decl. at paras. 59-70. See e.g. Covad GALA I Comments at 10-11; Covad GALA II Comments at 1-3. See AT&T GALA II Bradbury/Norris Decl. at paras. 104-05. See notes and discussion supra. See also Varner GALA
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-166A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-166A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-166A1.txt
  • April 2, 1992, revised April 8, 1997, § 1.12 (``Horizontal Merger Guidelines''). Staff and DOJ analysis of radio transactions suggests that existing buyers of radio advertising differ significantly in their likelihood of switching to other media in response to a ``small but significant and non-transitory'' price increase for radio advertising. Clear Channel Response at 2. See Horizontal Merger Guidelines § 1.22. Clear Channel Response at 2. Id. Id. Id. at 2-3. Our presumption regarding the Arbitron metro is consistent with the approach taken by the antitrust authorities. The DOJ has, in reviewing radio mergers, generally relied on the Arbitron metro as the appropriate geographic market. The DOJ recognized that stations outside Arbitron metros achieve listening share within the Arbitron metro and
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-172A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-172A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-172A1.txt
  • Channel Response at 2, citing a previous response regarding the Cheyenne, WY metro. See id. at 2. See id. See id. at 2-3. The other three stations identified by Clear Channel are KTXO(FM), Hope, Arkansas, KNRB(FM), Atlanta, Texas, and KOWS(FM) (see infra note 41), Ashdown, Arkansas. U.S. Dep't of Justice & Fed. Trade Comm'n, 1992 Horizontal Merger Guidelines §§ 1.2, 1.22 (as revised in 1997) (``1997 Merger Guidelines''). In markets such as radio advertising, where individually negotiated contracts facilitate price discrimination, determining the relevant geographic market is more complicated. Id. § 1.22. Three of these out-of-market stations are owned by Clear Channel. According to our database, the call signs KEWL-AM and KOWS(FM) have been changed to, respectively, KKTX(AM) and KPGG(FM). See
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-184A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-184A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-184A1.txt
  • 4, attached to PBC Response; Pollack Supp. Decl. at 5, 8. Horizontal Merger Guidelines, issued by the U.S. Department of Justice & Federal Trade Commission, Apr. 2, 1992, revised Apr. 8, 1997 (``Horizontal Merger Guidelines'') § 1.2. In markets such as radio advertising, where individually negotiated contracts facilitate price discrimination, determining the relevant geographic market is more complicated. Id. § 1.22. James Supp. Decl. at ¶ 2. These stations are KHLS(FM) and KLCN(AM), Blytheville, Arkansas; KWYN-FM, Wynne, Arkansas; KOKR(FM), Newport, Arkansas; KZLE(FM), Batesville, Arkansas; KTMO-FM, New Madrid, MO; KRLW-FM and KRLW(AM), Walnut Ridge, Arkansas; KTRQ(FM), Brinkley, Arkansas; KDRS-FM and KDRS(AM), Paragould, Arkansas; KOSE(AM), Osceola, Arkansas; KWOZ(FM), Mountain View, Arkansas; and KPOC(AM) and KPOC-FM, Pocahontas, Arkansas. See Pollack Supp. Decl. at 4-5,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-193A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-193A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-193A1.txt
  • 1.1, 1.12. See id. § 1.12. Staff and DOJ analysis of radio transactions suggests that existing buyers of radio advertising differ significantly in their likelihood of switching to other media in response to a ``small but significant and non-transitory'' price increase for radio advertising. See Horizontal Merger Guidelines § 1.2. See Cumulus Response at 5. See Horizontal Merger Guidelines § 1.22. Our presumption regarding the Arbitron metro is consistent with the approach taken by the antitrust authorities. The DOJ has, in reviewing radio mergers, generally relied on the Arbitron metro as the appropriate geographic market. Use of this definition appears consistent with the three factors that we believe are particularly critical in determining a relevant geographic market, namely, (1) industry recognition,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-218A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-218A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-218A1.txt
  • need or prefer to employ small antennas because most potential antenna sites, such as rooftops, monopoles, and electrical transmission towers, cannot support large microwave dishes, due to either space limitations or aesthetic objections of homeowner associations or zoning boards. Our rules, however, do not permit antennas smaller than 0.61 meters (2 feet) in diameter in the 23 GHz band, or 1.22 meters (4 feet) in diameter in the 10 GHz band. Antenna standards exist for the purpose of warranting the use of the most discriminating equipment to facilitate the introduction of new transmission paths. TIA recommends permitting 0.46-meter (18-inch) or 0.30 meter (1-foot) high performance antennas in the 23 GHz band, and 0.61-meter (2-foot) or 1.22-meter (4-foot) antennas in the 10
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-245A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-245A1.txt
  • to a `small but significant and nontransitory' price increase for the relevant product, ..... then a hypothetical monopolist would profitably impose a discriminatory price increase on sales to targeted buyers. This is true regardless of whether a general increase in price would cause such significant substitution that the price increase would not be profitable." 46 See Horizontal Merger Guidelines at §1.22. 47 Clear Channel Response at 3. Federal Communications Commission FCC 02-245 9 22. Market Participants. In the Parkersburg metro, Clear Channel currently owns five stations and, pursuant to a local marketing agreement ("LMA"), operates the Daugherty station it seeks to acquire in this transaction.48 BIA identifies 11 other commercial stations and four non-commercial stations in the Parkersburg metro.49 Clear Channel
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-251A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-251A1.txt
  • Merger Guidelines"). Staff and the United States Department of Justice ("DOJ") analysis of radio transactions suggests that existing buyers of radio advertising differ significantly in their likelihood of switching to other media in response to a "small but significant and non-transitory" price increase for radio advertising. 37 Clear Channel Response at 2. 38 Id. 39 See Horizontal Merger Guidelines § 1.22. 40 Clear Channel Response at 2. 41 Id. 42 Our presumption regarding the Arbitron metro is consistent with the approach taken by the antitrust authorities. The DOJ has, in reviewing radio mergers, generally relied on the Arbitron metro as the appropriate geographic market. The DOJ recognized that stations outside Arbitron metros achieve listening share within the Arbitron metro and that
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-30A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-30A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-30A1.txt
  • C.F.R. § 25.210. Third Report and Order, 12 FCC Rcd 22322, ¶ 31. Third Report and Order, 12 FCC Rcd 22323, ¶ 34; 47 C.F.R. § 25.145(c)(1). Third Report and Order, 12 FCC Rcd 22323, ¶ 34; 47 C.F.R. § 25.145(c)(2). ISLs are communication links between in-orbit satellites. ISLs operate in spectrum allocated to the inter-satellite service. ITU Radio Regulation S1.22. Third Report and Order, 12 FCC Rcd at 22325, ¶ 38. Third Report and Order, 12 FCC Rcd at 22325, ¶ 38. Third Report and Order, 12 FCC Rcd at 22316, ¶ 15 (waiving the financial qualification requirement because future Ka-band NGSO FSS entry was possible). Third Report and Order, 12 FCC Rcd, at 22318, ¶ 18. Redesignation of the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-330A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-330A1.txt
  • n/a 0.42 5.00 12 UNE Loop 2/4 wire analog 8db and 5.5db loop 0.21 3.01 0.26 3.18 0.17 2.96 0.37 2.61 0.35 2.59 12 UNE Loop 4 wire Digital 1.544 mbpd capable/HDSL 0.76 0.23 0.94 0.60 1.07 0.28 1.58 0.60 0.98 0.72 12 UNE Platform - Basic Port and (8db and 5.5db) Basic Loop - Field Work/No Field Work 0.00 1.22 0.00 1.26 0.00 1.17 0.01 1.05 0.02 1.05 13 - 1394200Resale Res POTS 1-30 Days 3.50 5.23 4.00 5.08 3.82 5.44 2.17 4.98 10.40 5.49 e 13 - 1394300Resale Res POTS 31-90 Days 43.0047.92 46.52 46.31 43.78 44.65abcde 13 - 1394500Resale Bus POTS 1-30 Days 4.67 7.04 2.00 6.42 2.50 7.71 6.00 7.00 7.33 6.56abcde 13 - 1395100Resale CTX 1-30
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-331A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-331A1.txt
  • CLEC BST CLEC Notes Federal Communications Commission FCC 02-331 Florida Performance Metric Data A.2.1.1.1.2Residence/<10 circuits/Non- Dispatch/FL (days) 0.86 0.70 0.84 0.88 0.83 0.83 0.81 0.77 1.00 0.73 A.2.1.1.2.1Residence/>=10 circuits/Dispatch/FL (days) 4.64 4.00 4.68 4.33 4.86 5.00 4.64 4.00 4.25 4.00 1,2,3,4,5 A.2.1.2.1.1Business/<10 circuits/Dispatch/FL (days) 3.54 3.25 6.02 4.10 6.40 4.08 4.92 4.49 5.88 5.56 A.2.1.2.1.2Business/<10 circuits/Non- Dispatch/FL (days) 1.29 0.94 1.22 1.08 1.23 0.96 1.25 0.84 1.28 0.92 A.2.1.2.2.1Business/>=10 circuits/Dispatch/FL (days) 10.28 8.57 11.50 5.25 12.35 9.50 14.71 3.33 13.70 6.60 1,2,3,4,5 A.2.1.2.2.2Business/>=10 circuits/Non- Dispatch/FL (days) 4.07 7.00 13.72 5.50 0.52 1.00 7.00 0.83 1,2,4 A.2.1.3.1.1Design (Specials)/<10 circuits/Dispatch/FL (days) 21.96 10.11 23.01 6.62 23.84 12.49 26.81 10.74 23.69 2.50 1 A.2.1.3.1.2Design (Specials)/<10 circuits/Non- Dispatch/FL (days) 10.98 4.13 8.45 4.50 8.97 3.58
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-52A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-52A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-52A1.txt
  • to advertisers that are more price sensitive. Nassau Dec. 6, 2001 Response at 21-22. Id. at 22. Nassau asserts that over 70 percent of Trenton metro listeners listen to radio stations that are not ``home'' to the Trenton metro. Id. at 23. Id. Id. Stockum Affidavit at 4-6. Id. at 5-6. See 1997 Merger Guidelines § 1.2. See id. § 1.22. We note that the Trenton metro is located near to the Philadelphia and New York metros, two of the largest metros in the country, and that the city of Trenton is situated near the border of the Trenton metro and the Philadelphia metro (more specifically, near the border of Mercer County and Bucks County). See note 13 supra. After the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-136A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-136A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-136A1.txt
  • prior Surveys. See 17 FCC Rcd 6301 (2002); 16 FCC Rcd 4346 (2001); 15 FCC Rcd 10927 (2000); 14 FCC Rcd 8331 (1999); 12 FCC Rcd 22756 (1997); and 12 FCC Rcd 3239 (1997). ATTACHMENT 4 Competitive Group, by Strata Element Wireline Overbuild DBS Overbuild LEC Low Penetration Municipal July 2002 BST $16.37 $17.05 $12.33 $16.59 $14.35 Standard error † 1.22 1.12 0.46 0.79 1.60 CPST $18.00 $17.23 $22.08 $17.89 $10.34 Standard error 1.77 1.91 0.65 1.10 2.33 Programming total $34.37 $34.28 $34.41 $34.48 $24.69 Standard error 1.29 1.32 0.54 0.60 1.35 Equipment $3.24 $2.77 $4.07 $2.08 $0.79 Standard error 0.33 0.35 0.18 0.24 0.42 Programming & equipment $37.61 $37.05 $38.48 $36.56 $25.48 Standard error 1.45 1.59 0.62 0.70 1.52 Channels
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-12A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-12A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-12A1.txt
  • 2004 * Sample groups combined Average $45.03 $31.25 $28.60 Observations 641 641 641 Standard error 0.49 0.43 0.40 Noncompetitive group Average $45.19 $31.24 $28.71 Observations 406 406 406 Standard error 0.43 0.36 0.36 Competitive group Average $43.25 $31.47 $27.43 Observations 235 235 235 Standard error 1.19 1.30 0.88 Wireline competition Average $43.00 $31.57 $26.76 Observations 115 115 115 Standard error 1.22 1.31 0.88 Wireline incumbent Average $44.40 $31.16 $26.66 Observations 65 65 65 Standard error 0.71 0.87 0.66 Wireline rival Average $36.79 $33.36 $27.17 Observations 50 50 50 Standard error 3.46 3.28 1.84 DBS competition *** Average $41.20 $32.41 $29.36 Observations 52 52 52 Standard error 1.28 1.19 0.84 Wireless competition *** Average $45.58 $29.73 $25.80 Observations 29 29 29 Standard
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-167A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-167A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-167A1.txt
  • capitalized or lower case, means non-U.S. 1.19. ``GC'' means Guam Cellular and Paging, Inc. 1.20. ``Governmental Authority'' or ``Governmental Authorities'' means any government, or any governmental, administrative, or regulatory entity, authority, commission, board, agency, instrumentality, bureau, or political subdivision, and any court, tribunal, judicial, or arbitral body. 1.21. ``Intercept'' or ``Intercepted'' has the meaning defined in 18 U.S.C. § 2510(4). 1.22. ``Lawful U.S. Process'' means lawful U.S. Federal, state, or local Electronic Surveillance or other court orders, processes, or authorizations issued under U.S. Federal, state, or local law for physical search or seizure, production of tangible things, or access to or disclosure of Domestic Communications, Call Associated Data, Transactional Data, or Subscriber Information. 1.23. ``Network Management Information'' means network management operations
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-179A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-179A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-179A1.txt
  • $35.78 $36.38 $43.34 $42.74 $40.47 Standard error 0.32 0.30 0.62 0.88 0.89 0.86 0.44 0.36 1.17 Digital tier plus equipment $12.99 $13.10 $11.85 $13.11 $12.68 $14.32 $11.10 $11.41 $6.65 Standard error 0.26 0.23 0.53 0.60 0.53 0.81 0.39 0.54 1.32 January 1, 2004 Basic $13.84 $13.79 $14.41 $13.01 $11.92 $16.05 $15.92 $14.29 $16.07 Standard error 0.40 0.38 0.70 0.74 0.57 1.22 0.59 0.70 1.48 Expanded basic $27.07 $27.39 $23.88 $21.12 $22.08 $18.43 $25.32 $26.90 $22.72 Standard error 0.51 0.47 0.88 0.95 0.81 1.33 0.81 0.74 1.67 Basic + expanded basic tiers $40.91 $41.18 $38.29 $34.13 $34.00 $34.48 $41.24 $41.19 $38.79 Standard error 0.32 0.29 0.61 0.84 0.85 0.80 0.42 0.43 1.05 Digital tier plus equipment $12.83 $12.90 $12.07 $13.30 $13.32 $13.26
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-104A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-104A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-104A1.txt
  • the main beam, the power density can reach a maximum before it begins to decrease with distance. The power density in the transition region between the near and far fields decreases inversely with distance from the antenna and the power density in the far field decreases inversely as the square of the distance. The near field for a 48 inch (1.22 meter) antenna operating at 60 GHz extends to 74 meters, the transition region extends from 74 meters to 178 meters, and the far field starts at 178 meters. For a 12 inch (0.3 meter) antenna, the near field extends to 4.6 meters, the transition region extends from 4.6 to 11 meters and the far field starts at 11 meters. See
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-163A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-163A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-163A1.txt
  • to accurately point the FS antenna towards the receive antenna). Finally, we sought comment on FiberTower's proposed amendments to the coordination requirements in Section 101.103 of the Commission's Rules to protect other users in the 11 GHz band from experiencing any greater interference from the use of a 0.61 meter antenna than would be experienced by the use of a 1.22 meter antenna. We asked whether these amendments strike the appropriate balance between efficient spectrum use and interference protection in the 11 GHz band and whether FiberTower's proposed amendments were sufficient to address potential interference concerns, or were unnecessary limitations on flexibility. Initial comments were due May 25, 2007, and reply comments were due on or before June 11, 2007. The
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-169A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-169A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-169A1.txt
  • COUNT only strengthens the approach taken in the Adelphia Order. The second regression differs from the Adelphia Order by adding TEAM COUNT, LN STANDARD DEVIATION ELEVATION and LN STANDARD DEVIATION ELEVATION*LATITUDE. Thus, it addresses all of the omitted variable claims. Table 2 DBS Penetration and RSN Access Independent Variables Dependent Variable: LN DBS PENETRATION Coefficient z-statistic LN CABLE PRICE 1.06 1.22 LN CABLE CHANNELS -0.72* -1.96 PHILLY -0.51* -6.59 SANDIEGO -0.87* -9.37 CHARLOTTE -0.22 -1.64 KEYDMA 0.23* 4.13 TEAM COUNT -0.04* -3.03 DBSOVERAIR -0.09 -1.59 CABLECOMP 0.04 0.18 HDTV -0.11 -1.57 INTERNET -0.02 -0.21 LN INCOME -0.21 -1.89 LN MULTIDWELL -0.39* -11.53 LN LATITUDE 0.38 0.91 LN STANDARD DEVIATION ELEVATION 1.01* 2.59 LN STANDARD DEVIATION ELEVATION*LATITUDE -0.25* -2.31 CONSTANT -1.08 -0.34
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-38A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-38A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-38A1.txt
  • use of microwave spectrum, including the 11 GHz band, while avoiding interference between operators. Although the rule on its face does not mandate a specific size of antenna, it does specify certain technical parameters - maximum beamwidth, minimum antenna gain, and minimum radiation suppression - that, given the current state of technology, limit operators to a minimum antenna size of 1.22 meters. When the Commission adopted the instant antenna specifications, the parameters were based on the technical sophistication of the communications equipment and the needs of the various users of the band at the time. Indeed, the Commission adopted similar technical specifications that effectively limited the size of antennas used in other bands, including those used by satellite. However, the Commission
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-43A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-43A1.txt
  • § 2510(4). 1.21. "Lawful U.S. Process" means lawful U.S. federal, state, or local court orders, subpoenas, warrants, processes, or authorizations issued under U.S. federal, state, or local law for electronic surveillance, physical search or seizure, production of tangible things, or Access to or disclosure of Domestic Communications, Call Associated Data, or U.S. Hosting Data, including Transactional Data or Subscriber Information. 1.22. "Lawfully Authorized Electronic Surveillance" means: (i) the interception of wire, oral, or electronic communications as defined in 18 U.S.C. §§ 2510(4), (1), (2), and (12), and electronic surveillance as defined in 50 U.S.C. § 1801(f); (ii) access to stored wire or electronic communications, as referred to in 18 U.S.C. § 2701 et seq.; (iii) acquisition of dialing, routing, addressing or
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-233A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-233A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-233A1.txt
  • mail). CTIA Opp., supra; NCTA Opp., supra; and USTelecom Opp., supra. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.461(i)(1) and (2) and 0.461(j). See also 0.461(d)(3) (FOIA requests for records submitted to the Commission with a request for confidentiality are provided ``to the person who originally submitted the materials to the Commission'' for a response). See 47 C.F.R. § 0.461(d)(3). 47 C.F.R. § 1.22; see 47 C.F.R. § 1.23(b). We note, however, that CTIA and USTelecom participated in the Part 4 Rules proceeding. See Part 4 Rules, App. A, 19 FCC Rcd at 16918. See USTelecom Opp. at 1 (USTelecom files its opposition ``on behalf of its members'' which ``include service providers that are subject to the Commission's outage reporting requirements''). See CTIA Opp.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-33A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-33A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-33A1.txt
  • among service providers, as well as the rapid deployment of new technologies. Allowing Smaller Antennas in the 11 GHz Band In September 2007, the Commission adopted amendments to Section 101.115 of its Rules to permit the installation of smaller antennas by Fixed Service (FS) operators in the 10.7-11.7 GHz (11 GHz) band. This decision reduced the minimum antenna diameter from 1.22 meters to 0.61 meters, while protecting other users from experiencing any greater interference than they would otherwise have experienced from systems using larger antennas. The effect was to make 11 GHz transmission equipment significantly more affordable for users who could not otherwise have justified the costs involved: the smaller antennas not only cost less to manufacture and distribute; they are
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-97-145A1.pdf
  • rules to require carriers to file the quarterly and the semi-annual reports only once each year.2° Noting that all but one of the annual ARMIS reports must be filed on or before April 1,21 we amended our rules to specify that carriers must now file the Annual Summary Report (43-01) and the Customer Satisfaction Report (43-06) on or before April 1.22 Furthermore, theOrder and Noticedirected the Common Carrier Bureau (Bureau) to make any changes to the form and content of these reports necessary to accommodate the change from quarterly and semi-annual filings to annual filings.23 In this part of thisOrder,we briefly address whether the 43-0 1 and 43-06 reports are now repetitive with other existing ARMIS reports and no longer necessary
• http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Cable/Reports/fc99418a.doc http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Cable/Reports/fc99418a.txt
  • 41.03 64.2% 5.4% 30 to 53 24.35 39.8% 23.57 37.3% -3.2% 22.00 34.4% -6.7% 20 to 29 0.85 1.4% 0.61 1.0% -28.2% 0.74 1.2% 21.3% 13 to 19 0.09 0.1% 0.06 0.1% -33.3% 0.07 0.1% 16.7% 6 to 12 0.19 0.3% 0.09 0.1% -52.6% 0.08 0.1% -11.1% 5 or less 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.0% Not Avail. 1.22 - 1.20 - -1.6% 2.13 - 77.5% Total 62.43 - 64.44 - 3.2% 66.05 - 2.5% Sys. w/30+ channels 60.08 98.2% 62.48 98.8% 4.0% 63.03 98.6% 0.9% Sys. w/less than 30 1.13 1.8% 0.76 1.2% -32.7% 0.89 1.4% 17.1% Notes: Figures are as of October 1, 1997, October 1, 1998, and October 1, 1999. All "Percent of Subscribers" calculations exclude
• http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Cable/Reports/fcc98335.pdf http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Cable/Reports/fcc98335.txt
  • 8.9% 30 to 53 26.06 42.9% 24.35 39.8% -6.6% 23.57 37.3% -3.2% 20 to 29 0.81 1.3% 0.85 1.4% 4.9% 0.61 1.0% -28.2% 13 to 19 0.10 0.2% 0.09 0.1% -10.0% 0.06 0.1% -33.3% 6 to 12 0.19 0.3% 0.19 0.3% 0.0% 0.09 0.1% -52.6% 5 or less 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.0% Not Avail. 0.09 - 1.22 - 1255.6% 1.20 - -1.6% Total 60.83 - 62.43 - 2.6% 64.44 - 3.2% Sys. w/30+ channels 59.64 98.2% 60.08 98.2% 0.7% 62.5 98.8% 4.0% Sys. w/less than 30 1.10 1.8% 1.13 1.8% 2.7% 0.8 1.2% -32.7% Note: Figures are as of October 1, 1996, October 1, 1997, and October 30, 1998. Note: All "Percentage of Systems" calculation excludes "not
• http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/fcc99404.doc http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/fcc99404.pdf http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/fcc99404.txt
  • at para. 68. AT&T states that it requests five day intervals for UNE platform orders, even if the standard interval is only two days. AT&T Pfau/Kalb Aff. at para. 143. For example, in August the average standard interval for UNE-P orders that were within the standard interval was 1.84 days, while the average standard interval for retail orders was only 1.22 days, a difference of 0.62 days. Bell Atlantic Gertner/Bamberger Reply Decl. at paras. 5-6 & Table 2. Gertner and Bamberger also point out that customer-caused delays in completing orders that missed the due date can also lengthen the Average Completed Interval for wholesale orders. They analyzed the data looking for orders more than three days late, which they considered to
• http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireline_Competition/Orders/2002/fcc02118.pdf
  • PR-8-02-5000 Open Orders in a Hold Status > 90 Days 0 0 0 0 0 0 11.58 0 4.18 0 MAINTENANCE MR-2 ­ Trouble Report Rate MR-2-01-5000 Network Trouble Report Rate 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.02 0 0.03 MR-4 ­ Trouble Duration Intervals MR-4-01-5000 Mean Time To Repair ­ Total NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 1.22 NA 2.06 d,e MR-4-04-5000 % Cleared (all troubles) within 24 Hours NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 100 NA 100 d,e MR-4-05-5000 % Out of Service > 2 Hours NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 0 NA 33.33 d,e MR-4-06-5000 % Out of Service > 4 Hours NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 0 NA 0 d,e
• http://transition.fcc.gov/Speeches/Furchtgott_Roth/Statements/sthfr817.html http://transition.fcc.gov/Speeches/Furchtgott_Roth/Statements/sthfr817.wp
  • say with certainty. Commission orders last year set caps of $2.25 billion annually for schools and libraries. For the second quarter of 1997, we have imposed a 0.71 percent tax on all telecomm services, both interstate and intrastate, to support schools and libraries programs for an amount of $1.3 billion annual rate. The $2.25 billion annual rate would require a 1.22 percent tax on all telecommunications. Moreover, as I explain below, I have substantial doubts about our authority to tax intrastate services directly or even to use them as a basis for taxes. To support fully the promised schools and libraries program with just interstate telecommunications service revenue would require a tax rate of 3.2 percent. The Commission has thus set
• http://transition.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/FCC-99-55A1.doc http://transition.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/FCC-99-55A1.pdf
  • Analysis. The action contained herein has been analyzed with respect to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 and found to impose new or modified reporting and recordkeeping requirements or burdens on the public. Implementation of these new or modified reporting and recordkeeping requirements will be subject to approval by the Office of Management and Budget as prescribed by the Act. 1.22 The Final Regulatory Flexibility Analysis, pursuant to the Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. § 604, is contained in Appendix B. 1.23 Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to the authority contained in Sections 4(i), 4(j), 303, 308 and 309 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 4(i), 4(j), 303, 308 and 309, Sections 73.3517, 73.3571, 73.3573
• http://transition.fcc.gov/ownership/materials/already-released/consumer090002.pdf
  • BB/EZ 7 0.13 B/T 6 0.1 BB/FS 5 0.09 BB 315 4.99 BB/O 1 0.02 BB/EZ 3 0.05 Country (C) 772 14.1 BB/REL 1 0.02 C/FS 20 0.37 BB/T 1 0.02 CHR 488 8.91 C 904 14.32 CHR/AC 15 0.27 C/FS 14 0.22 CHR/Spanish (SP) 3 0.05 CHR 410 6.49 CHR/Urban (U) 9 0.16 CHR/AC 51 0.81 Classical (CL) 67 1.22 CHR/NR 9 0.14 Classic AOR(CL AOR) 151 2.76 CHR/U 56 0.89 Ethnic (E) 16 0.29 CL 70 1.11 Easy Listening (EZ) 2 0.04 CL AOR 284 4.5 EZ/New Age Contemp. (NAC) 1 0.02 CL HITS 83 1.31 EZ/SAC 3 0.05 E 14 0.22 FS 202 3.69 EZ 13 0.21 FS/T 41 0.75 EZ/SAC 1 0.02 G 55 1 FS 96
• http://transition.fcc.gov/ownership/roundtable_docs/waldfogel-a.pdf
  • Who Benefits Whom among Blacks and Whites? Five-Digit Zips Hybrid Zips (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) MSA White Pop ( 1) 0.0086 0.0085 0.0116 0.0085 0.0136 0.0095 0.0059 0.0093 (5.68)** (5.06)** (2.57)* (4.91)** (3.63)** (2.44)* (3.30)** (2.26)* MSA Black Pop ( 2) 0.0025 -0.0004 0.0156 -0.0005 0.0133 0.0264 0.0106 0.0259 (0.32) (0.05) (0.74) (0.06) (0.71) (1.32) (1.18) (1.22) Zip Black Fr. -0.1367 -0.1120 -0.0931 -0.1990 -0.1556 -0.0942 -0.1068 -0.1014 (19.45)** (15.44)** (5.91)** (6.16)** (9.82)** (6.00)** (15.11)** (0.91) Zip Black Fr.* White Pop ( 1- 1) -0.0426 -0.0419 -0.0712 -0.0397 -0.0687 -0.0726 -0.0397 -0.0665 (6.11)** (5.95)** (3.58)** (4.54)** (3.17)** (3.44)** (5.81)** (2.34)* Zip Black Fr.* Black Pop ( 2- 2) 0.1505 0.1221 0.1724 0.1172 0.2258 0.1791 0.1075 0.1755 (4.99)**
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/21/charts/21press2.pdf
  • Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit FCC Location and Monitoring Service Auction Summary Measures by Round RoundNew Bids New High Gross Bids Net Bids Eligible BiddersEligibility Ratio Stage Stage Trans. % 35 3 3 $5,002,904.00 $3,251,893.00 4 0.75 3 1.22 36 3 3 $5,021,004.00 $3,263,658.00 4 0.75 3 1.22 37 3 3 $5,042,004.00 $3,277,308.00 4 0.75 3 1.22 38 3 3 $5,067,004.00 $3,293,558.00 4 0.75 3 1.22 39 1 1 $5,088,004.00 $3,307,208.00 4 0.75 3 1.01 40 4 4 $5,119,854.00 $3,327,911.00 4 0.75 3 1.27 41 3 3 $5,185,771.00 $3,370,757.00 4 0.75 3 0.94 42 1 1 $5,029,088.00 $3,268,910.00 4
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/rss/index.htm?job=ainf&id=65
  • licenses in the 800 MHz band in the three alternative band configurations. Licenses in only one of these mutually incompatible band configurations will be awarded. Qualified Bidders: 9 Rounds Completed: 63 Bidding Days: 9 Results for Round 63 Gross Revenue: $33,315,000.00 - Dollar Change: 95000.00 - % Change: 0.29 Net Revenue: $32,816,000.00 - Dollar Change: -404000.00 - % Change: - 1.22 New Bids: 1 Withdrawn Bids: 0 Proactive Waivers: 0 Bidders that Reduced Eligibility: 0 Licenses with PWBs*: 2 FCC Held Licenses: 0 Eligible Bidders: 3 (of 9 qualified bidders) * PWBs = Provisionally Winning Bidders http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/default.htm?job=auction_summary&id=65W ed, 24 May 2006 17:25:00 GMT Summary Licenses: Auction No. 65 will offer nationwide commercial licenses in the 800 MHz band in the three
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Cable/Reports/fc99418a.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Cable/Reports/fc99418a.txt
  • 41.03 64.2% 5.4% 30 to 53 24.35 39.8% 23.57 37.3% -3.2% 22.00 34.4% -6.7% 20 to 29 0.85 1.4% 0.61 1.0% -28.2% 0.74 1.2% 21.3% 13 to 19 0.09 0.1% 0.06 0.1% -33.3% 0.07 0.1% 16.7% 6 to 12 0.19 0.3% 0.09 0.1% -52.6% 0.08 0.1% -11.1% 5 or less 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.0% Not Avail. 1.22 - 1.20 - -1.6% 2.13 - 77.5% Total 62.43 - 64.44 - 3.2% 66.05 - 2.5% Sys. w/30+ channels 60.08 98.2% 62.48 98.8% 4.0% 63.03 98.6% 0.9% Sys. w/less than 30 1.13 1.8% 0.76 1.2% -32.7% 0.89 1.4% 17.1% Notes: Figures are as of October 1, 1997, October 1, 1998, and October 1, 1999. All "Percent of Subscribers" calculations exclude
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Cable/Reports/fcc98335.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Cable/Reports/fcc98335.txt
  • 8.9% 30 to 53 26.06 42.9% 24.35 39.8% -6.6% 23.57 37.3% -3.2% 20 to 29 0.81 1.3% 0.85 1.4% 4.9% 0.61 1.0% -28.2% 13 to 19 0.10 0.2% 0.09 0.1% -10.0% 0.06 0.1% -33.3% 6 to 12 0.19 0.3% 0.19 0.3% 0.0% 0.09 0.1% -52.6% 5 or less 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.0% Not Avail. 0.09 - 1.22 - 1255.6% 1.20 - -1.6% Total 60.83 - 62.43 - 2.6% 64.44 - 3.2% Sys. w/30+ channels 59.64 98.2% 60.08 98.2% 0.7% 62.5 98.8% 4.0% Sys. w/less than 30 1.10 1.8% 1.13 1.8% 2.7% 0.8 1.2% -32.7% Note: Figures are as of October 1, 1996, October 1, 1997, and October 30, 1998. Note: All "Percentage of Systems" calculation excludes "not
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/fcc99404.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/fcc99404.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/fcc99404.txt
  • at para. 68. AT&T states that it requests five day intervals for UNE platform orders, even if the standard interval is only two days. AT&T Pfau/Kalb Aff. at para. 143. For example, in August the average standard interval for UNE-P orders that were within the standard interval was 1.84 days, while the average standard interval for retail orders was only 1.22 days, a difference of 0.62 days. Bell Atlantic Gertner/Bamberger Reply Decl. at paras. 5-6 & Table 2. Gertner and Bamberger also point out that customer-caused delays in completing orders that missed the due date can also lengthen the Average Completed Interval for wholesale orders. They analyzed the data looking for orders more than three days late, which they considered to
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2002/fcc02331.pdf
  • CLEC BST CLEC Notes Federal Communications Commission FCC 02-331 Florida Performance Metric Data A.2.1.1.1.2Residence/<10 circuits/Non- Dispatch/FL (days) 0.86 0.70 0.84 0.88 0.83 0.83 0.81 0.77 1.00 0.73 A.2.1.1.2.1Residence/>=10 circuits/Dispatch/FL (days) 4.64 4.00 4.68 4.33 4.86 5.00 4.64 4.00 4.25 4.00 1,2,3,4,5 A.2.1.2.1.1Business/<10 circuits/Dispatch/FL (days) 3.54 3.25 6.02 4.10 6.40 4.08 4.92 4.49 5.88 5.56 A.2.1.2.1.2Business/<10 circuits/Non- Dispatch/FL (days) 1.29 0.94 1.22 1.08 1.23 0.96 1.25 0.84 1.28 0.92 A.2.1.2.2.1Business/>=10 circuits/Dispatch/FL (days) 10.28 8.57 11.50 5.25 12.35 9.50 14.71 3.33 13.70 6.60 1,2,3,4,5 A.2.1.2.2.2Business/>=10 circuits/Non- Dispatch/FL (days) 4.07 7.00 13.72 5.50 0.52 1.00 7.00 0.83 1,2,4 A.2.1.3.1.1Design (Specials)/<10 circuits/Dispatch/FL (days) 21.96 10.11 23.01 6.62 23.84 12.49 26.81 10.74 23.69 2.50 1 A.2.1.3.1.2Design (Specials)/<10 circuits/Non- Dispatch/FL (days) 10.98 4.13 8.45 4.50 8.97 3.58
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref02.pdf
  • 1.19 Monthly Telephone Rates in the Sample Cities for a Business with a PBX Trunk (As of October 15), 1990-2001...........................................32 Table 1.20 Connection Charges for Three PBX Trunks in the Sample Cities (As of October 15), 1990-2001.....................34 B. Toll Service Rates...........................................................................................................36 Table 1.21 Basic Schedule Rates of AT&T, WorldCom, and Sprint for Residential Customers for a 10-Minute Day Call...........................37 Table 1.22 Basic Schedule Rates of AT&T, WorldCom, and Sprint for Residential Customers for a 10-Minute Evening Call..........................38 Table 1.23 Basic Schedule Rates of AT&T, WorldCom, and Sprint for Residential Customers for a 10-Minute Night/Weekend Call..............39 Table 1.24 AT&T Basic Schedule Residential Rates for 10-minute Interstate InterLATA Calls, 1927-2001............................................40 Table 1.25 Average Long Distance Bills for Price-Sensitive Residential Callers....................................................41 Table 1.26 Average
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref03.pdf
  • 1.19 Monthly Telephone Rates in the Sample Cities for a Business with a PBX Trunk (As of October 15), 1990-2002 Table 1.20 Connection Charges for Three PBX Trunks in the Sample Cities (As of October 15), 1999 -2002 Table 1.21 Basic Schedule Rates of AT&T, WorldCom, and Sprint for Residential Customers for a 10-Minute Day, Evening, and Night Call Table 1.22 AT&T Basic Schedule Residential Rates for 10-minute Interstate InterLATA Calls, 1927-2002 Table 1.23 Average Revenue per Minute for Interstate Toll Service Calls II. Expenditures on Telephone Service .........................................................II-1 A. Residential Expenditures..................................................................II-1 B. Business Expenditures.....................................................................II-2 C. Additional Sources of Information on Expenditures for Telephone Service......II-2 Table 2.1 Average Annual Household Expenditures by Household Location Table 2.2 Average Annual Household Expenditures by
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref04.pdf
  • 1.51 1.56 1.58 1.70 2.00 2.12 2.15 2.29 2.31 2.41 2.40 2.42 2.39 2.48 2.57 3.03 3.94 4.28 Total Monthly Charge $17.70$18.18$18.11$19.05$19.24$19.77$19.72$19.95$19.81$20.01$19.95$19.88$19.76$19.93 $20.78 $22.62 $24.07 $24.75 Basic Connection Charge 4 45.63 44.04 42.94 43.06 43.06 42.00 41.50 41.38 41.28 40.91 41.11 41.04 41.24 41.26 41.45 40.02 39.83 39.35 Additional Connection Charge for Touch-tone Service 1.34 1.31 1.55 1.76 1.77 1.27 1.22 1.23 0.85 0.23 0.23 0.17 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12 a4 a4 Taxes, 911, and Other Charges 2.28 2.20 2.11 2.44 2.32 2.30 2.29 2.30 2.33 2.44 2.36 2.46 2.38 2.57 2.53 2.81 1.33 1.41 Total Connection Charge $49.25$47.55$46.60$47.26$47.15$45.57$45.01$44.92$44.46$43.58$43.70$43.67$43.74$43.95 $44.10 $42.95 $41.16 $40.76 Additional Charge if Drop Line and Connection Block Needed a1 a1 6.04 6.07 6.89 6.89 6.50 7.29 6.74
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref05.pdf
  • 1.70 2.00 2.12 2.15 2.29 2.31 2.41 2.40 2.42 2.39 2.48 2.57 3.03 3.94 4.12 3.97 Total Monthly Charge $17.70$18.18$18.11$19.05$19.24$19.77$19.72$19.95$19.81$20.01$19.95$19.88$19.76$19.93 $20.78 $22.62 $24.07 $24.52 $24.31 Basic Connection Charge 4 45.63 44.04 42.94 43.06 43.06 42.00 41.50 41.38 41.28 40.91 41.11 41.04 41.24 41.26 41.45 40.02 39.83 39.22 39.26 Additional Connection Charge for Touch-tone Service 1.34 1.31 1.55 1.76 1.77 1.27 1.22 1.23 0.85 0.23 0.23 0.17 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12 a4 a4 a4 Taxes, 911, and Other Charges 2.28 2.20 2.11 2.44 2.32 2.30 2.29 2.30 2.33 2.44 2.36 2.46 2.38 2.57 2.53 2.81 1.33 3.32 3.32 Total Connection Charge $49.25$47.55$46.60$47.26$47.15$45.57$45.01$44.92$44.46$43.58$43.70$43.67$43.74$43.95 $44.10 $42.95 $41.16 $42.54 $42.59 Additional Charge if Drop Line and Connection Block Needed a1 a1 6.04 6.07 6.89 6.89
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref97.pdf
  • 44.57 44.68 Number of cities in the sample offering Measured Service 83 83 84 84 84 87 87 Measured Service base rate 16.18 16.17 16.76 16.55 16.60 16.74 17.11 200 five minute business day calls 16.11 16.19 16.70 17.23 17.57 17.38 17.08 Subscriber Line Charges 3.54 3.55 3.55 3.54 3.55 3.55 3.54 Extra for Touch-tone 2.48 2.39 1.87 1.73 1.68 1.22 0.98 Tax including 911 charges 4.41 4.53 4.56 4.77 4.86 4.83 5.00 Total monthly charge 42.72 42.83 43.44 43.82 44.26 43.72 43.71 Additional local five-minute call 0.093 0.093 0.091 0.093 0.094 0.092 0.091 Inside wiring maintenance 1.78 1.91 2.05 2.03 2.08 2.26 2.39 Rotary connection charge 71.05 71.36 72.75 72.55 71.41 69.88 67.87 Extra for Touch-tone 1.70 1.89 1.13 1.19
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref98.pdf
  • Table 1.18 Average Local Rates for a Business with a PBX Trunk, 1989-1997...................31 iii Table 1.19 Monthly Rates in the Sample Cities for a Business with a PBX Trunk, 1990-1997........32 Table 1.20 Connection Charges in the Sample Cities for Three PBX Trunks, 1990-1997...............34 B. Rates in Rural Areas.........................................36 Table 1.21 Average Monthly Rates of RUS Borrowers by State, 1996...................37 Table 1.22 Average Monthly Rates of RUS Borrowers, 1994-1996.....................38 Table 1.23 Average Monthly Rates of RUS Borrowers by the Number of Lines Served, 1996..........38 Table 1.24 Average Monthly Rates of RUS Borrowers by the Number of Exchanges Served, 1996.....38 C. Additional Sources of Information on Local Rates...................39 II. Toll Rates.....................................................40 A. Residential Rates............................................40 Table 2.1 Residential Basic Schedule Rates of AT&T, MCI,
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref99.pdf
  • Table 1.18 Average Local Rates for a Business with a PBX Trunk, 1989-1998..................31 ii Table 1.19 Monthly Rates in the Sample Cities for a Business with a PBX Trunk, 1990-1998.......32 Table 1.20 Connection Charges in the Sample Cities for Three PBX Trunks, 1990-1998..............34 B. Rates in Rural Areas.....................................36 Table 1.21 Average Monthly Rates of RUS Borrowers by State, 1997.................37 Table 1.22 Average Monthly Rates of RUS Borrowers, 1994-1997....................38 Table 1.23 Average Monthly Rates of RUS Borrowers by the Number of Lines Served, 1997........39 Table 1.24 Average Monthly Rates of RUS Borrowers by the Number of Exchanges Served, 1997....40 C. Additional Sources of Information on Local Rates.................41 II. Toll Rates.................................................42 A. Residential Rates........................................42 Table 2.1 Residential Basic Schedule Rates of AT&T, MCI,
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/strev-96.pdf
  • CONNECTICUT 39,124 39,516 0.02 5 DELAWARE 9,658 9,658 0.01 1 DIST. OF COLUMBIA 0 0 0.00 0 FLORIDA 11,607,125 11,791,191 6.89 1,611 GEORGIA 3,063,614 3,612,564 2.11 494 HAWAII 27,466 27,466 0.02 4 IDAHO 335,902 369,237 0.22 50 ILLINOIS 7,369,246 7,562,347 4.42 1,033 INDIANA 3,977,811 4,162,443 2.43 569 IOWA 1,550,805 1,854,480 1.08 253 KANSAS 1,249,110 1,484,238 0.87 203 KENTUCKY 1,616,388 2,086,652 1.22 285 LOUISIANA 2,250,837 2,425,863 1.42 331 MAINE 0 0 0.00 0 MARYLAND 2,981,271 2,986,976 1.75 408 MASSACHUSETTS 1,980,351 1,982,163 1.16 271 MICHIGAN 7,697,140 7,964,121 4.66 1,088 MINNESOTA 1,866,459 2,475,157 1.45 338 MISSISSIPPI 712,051 759,630 0.44 104 MISSOURI 2,413,758 2,593,582 1.52 354 MONTANA 354,831 510,919 0.30 70 NEBRASKA 845,444 968,443 0.57 132 NEVADA 272,895 285,754 0.17 39 NEW HAMPSHIRE 0 0
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/strev-97.pdf
  • 0.55 0.80 (0.24) MINNESOTA 41,770 37,072 4,698 1.21 1.07 0.14 MISSISSIPPI 28,343 17,587 10,756 1.79 1.11 0.68 MISSOURI 50,202 40,337 9,864 1.26 1.01 0.25 MONTANA 43,780 7,994 35,786 7.18 1.31 5.87 NEBRASKA 20,831 13,319 7,513 1.74 1.11 0.63 NEVADA 9,134 20,711 (11,577) 0.63 1.43 (0.80) NEW HAMPSHIRE 9,067 14,531 (5,463) 0.92 1.48 (0.56) NEW JERSEY 3,408 94,549 (91,141) 0.05 1.27 (1.22) NEW MEXICO 37,035 14,865 22,170 3.42 1.37 2.05 NEW YORK 96,991 156,709 (59,718) 0.64 1.03 (0.39) NORTH CAROLINA 42,608 60,579 (17,971) 0.76 1.08 (0.32) NORTH DAKOTA 22,292 6,012 16,281 4.62 1.25 3.38 OHIO 19,641 72,641 (53,000) 0.24 0.90 (0.66) OKLAHOMA 59,151 24,027 35,124 2.52 1.02 1.50 OREGON 38,862 28,014 10,848 1.60 1.15 0.45 PENNSYLVANIA 26,371 92,107 (65,736) 0.28 0.97 (0.69)
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/strev-99.pdf
  • 0.22 5,388 0.17 1,322 0.04 Maine 7,474 0.72 1,749 0.17 5,724 0.55 Maryland 461 0.01 8,516 0.18 -8,055 -0.17 Massachusetts 470 0.01 10,485 0.19 -10,015 -0.18 Michigan 7,869 0.10 11,094 0.14 -3,225 -0.04 Minnesota 17,305 0.47 7,010 0.19 10,295 0.28 Mississippi 3,802 0.22 3,297 0.19 505 0.03 Missouri 8,185 0.19 7,542 0.17 643 0.01 Montana 9,332 1.44 1,463 0.23 7,869 1.22 Nebraska 11,089 0.92 2,439 0.20 8,650 0.72 Nevada 6,354 0.40 3,497 0.22 2,857 0.18 New Hampshire 4,893 0.47 2,495 0.24 2,398 0.23 New Jersey 970 0.01 16,066 0.20 -15,096 -0.19 New Mexico 9,122 0.80 2,613 0.23 6,510 0.57 New York 18,518 0.12 27,798 0.18 -9,281 -0.06 North Carolina 5,935 0.10 11,387 0.19 -5,452 -0.09 North Dakota 10,478 2.09 1,074 0.21
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend100.pdf
  • 1.51 1.56 1.58 1.70 2.00 2.12 2.15 2.29 2.31 2.41 2.40 2.42 2.39 2.45 Total Monthly Charge 17.70 18.18 18.11 19.05 19.24 19.77 19.72 19.95 19.81 20.01 19.95 19.88 19.76 19.87 Basic Connection Charge 45.63 44.04 42.94 43.06 43.06 42.00 41.50 41.38 41.28 40.91 41.11 41.04 41.24 41.26 Additional Connection Charge for Touch-tone Service 1.34 1.31 1.55 1.76 1.77 1.27 1.22 1.23 0.85 0.23 0.23 0.17 0.12 0.12 Taxes 2.28 2.20 2.11 2.44 2.32 2.30 2.29 2.30 2.33 2.44 2.36 2.46 2.38 2.52 Total Connection Charge 49.25 47.55 46.60 47.26 47.15 45.57 45.01 44.92 44.46 43.58 43.70 43.67 43.74 43.90 Additional Charge if Drop Line and Connection Block Needed n.a. n.a. 6.04 6.07 6.89 6.89 6.50 7.29 6.74 5.90 5.74 5.65
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend199.pdf
  • Taxes and 911 Charges 1.51 1.56 1.58 1.70 2.00 2.12 2.15 2.29 2.31 2.41 2.40 2.42 2.44 Total Monthly Charge 17.70 18.18 18.11 19.05 19.24 19.77 19.72 19.95 19.81 20.01 19.95 19.88 19.85 Basic Connection Charge 45.63 44.04 42.94 43.06 43.06 42.00 41.50 41.38 41.28 40.91 41.11 41.04 41.31 Additional Connection Charge forTouch-tone Service 1.34 1.31 1.55 1.76 1.77 1.27 1.22 1.23 0.85 0.23 0.23 0.17 0.12 Taxes 2.28 2.20 2.11 2.44 2.32 2.30 2.29 2.30 2.33 2.44 2.36 2.46 2.40 Total Connection Charge 49.25 47.55 46.60 47.26 47.15 45.57 45.01 44.92 44.46 43.58 43.70 43.67 43.83 Additional Charge if Drop Line andConnection Block Needed n.a. n.a. 6.04 6.07 6.89 6.89 6.50 7.29 6.74 5.90 5.74 5.65 5.64 Lowest-cost Inside Wiring
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend200.pdf
  • 1.51 1.56 1.58 1.70 2.00 2.12 2.15 2.29 2.31 2.41 2.40 2.42 2.39 2.45 Total Monthly Charge 17.70 18.18 18.11 19.05 19.24 19.77 19.72 19.95 19.81 20.01 19.95 19.88 19.76 19.87 Basic Connection Charge 45.63 44.04 42.94 43.06 43.06 42.00 41.50 41.38 41.28 40.91 41.11 41.04 41.24 41.24 Additional Connection Charge for Touch-Tone Service 1.34 1.31 1.55 1.76 1.77 1.27 1.22 1.23 0.85 0.23 0.23 0.17 0.12 0.12 Taxes 2.28 2.20 2.11 2.44 2.32 2.30 2.29 2.30 2.33 2.44 2.36 2.46 2.38 2.52 Total Connection Charge 49.25 47.55 46.60 47.26 47.15 45.57 45.01 44.92 44.46 43.58 43.70 43.67 43.74 43.88 Additional Charge if Drop Line and Connection Block Needed NA NA 6.04 6.07 6.89 6.89 6.50 7.29 6.74 5.90 5.74 5.65
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend298.pdf
  • Service 1.57 1.52 1.54 1.52 1.33 1.06 0.97 0.94 0.77 0.44 0.30 0.12 Taxes and 911 Charges 1.51 1.56 1.58 1.70 2.00 2.12 2.15 2.29 2.31 2.41 2.40 2.44 Total Monthly Charge 17.70 18.18 18.11 19.05 19.24 19.77 19.72 19.95 19.81 20.01 19.95 19.92 Basic Connection Charge $45.63$44.04$42.94$43.06$43.06$42.00$41.50$41.38$41.28$40.91$41.11$41.06 Additional Connection Charge for Touch-tone Service 1.34 1.31 1.55 1.76 1.77 1.27 1.22 1.23 0.85 0.23 0.23 0.17 Taxes 2.28 2.20 2.11 2.44 2.32 2.30 2.29 2.30 2.33 2.44 2.36 2.46 Total Connection Charge 46.97 45.35 44.49 44.82 44.83 45.57 42.72 44.92 44.46 43.58 43.70 43.68 Additional Charge if Drop Line and Connection Block Needed n.a. n.a. 6.04 6.07 6.89 6.89 6.50 7.29 6.74 5.90 5.74 5.65 Lowest-cost Inside Wiring Maintenance Plan $0.58
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend299.pdf
  • Other Mandatory Payments 1.51 1.56 1.58 1.70 2.00 2.12 2.15 2.29 2.31 2.41 2.40 2.42 2.44 Total Monthly Charge 17.70 18.18 18.11 19.05 19.24 19.77 19.72 19.95 19.81 20.01 19.95 19.88 19.85 Basic Connection Charge 45.63 44.04 42.94 43.06 43.06 42.00 41.50 41.38 41.28 40.91 41.11 41.04 41.31 Additional Connection Charge for Touch-tone Service 1.34 1.31 1.55 1.76 1.77 1.27 1.22 1.23 0.85 0.23 0.23 0.17 0.12 Other Mandatory Payments 2.28 2.20 2.11 2.44 2.32 2.30 2.29 2.30 2.33 2.44 2.36 2.46 2.40 Total Connection Charge 49.25 47.55 46.60 47.26 47.15 45.57 45.01 44.92 44.46 43.58 43.70 43.67 43.83 Additional Charge if Drop Line and Connection Block Needed n.a. n.a. 6.04 6.07 6.89 6.89 6.50 7.29 6.74 5.90 5.74 5.65 5.64
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend502.pdf
  • 2.15 2.29 2.31 2.41 2.40 2.42 2.39 2.48 2.57 2.70 Total Monthly Charge $17.70 $18.18 $18.11 $19.05 $19.24 $19.77 $19.72 $19.95 $19.81 $20.01 $19.95 $19.88 $19.76 $19.93 $20.78 $21.84 Basic Connection Charge $45.63 $44.04 $42.94 $43.06 $43.06 $42.00 $41.50 $41.38 $41.28 $40.91 $41.11 $41.04 $41.24 $41.26 $41.45 $40.16 Additional Connection Charge for Touch-Tone Service 1.34 1.31 1.55 1.76 1.77 1.27 1.22 1.23 0.85 0.23 0.23 0.17 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12 Taxes, 911, and Other Charges 2.28 2.20 2.11 2.44 2.32 2.30 2.29 2.30 2.33 2.44 2.36 2.46 2.38 2.57 2.53 2.44 Total Connection Charge $49.25 $47.55 $46.60 $47.26 $47.15 $45.57 $45.01 $44.92 $44.46 $43.58 $43.70 $43.67 $43.74 $43.95 $44.10 $42.72 Additional Charge if Drop Line and Connection Block Neede d NA
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend504.pdf
  • 2.40 2.42 2.39 2.48 2.57 3.03 3.14 Total Monthly Charge $17.70 $18.18 $18.11 $19.05 $19.24 $19.77 $19.72 $19.95 $19.81 $20.01 $19.95 $19.88 $19.76 $19.93 $20.78 $22.62 $23.38 Basic Connection Charge $45.63 $44.04 $42.94 $43.06 $43.06 $42.00 $41.50 $41.38 $41.28 $40.91 $41.11 $41.04 $41.24 $41.26 $41.45 $40.02 $39.57 Additional Connection Charge for Touch- Tone Service 1.34 1.31 1.55 1.76 1.77 1.27 1.22 1.23 0.85 0.23 0.23 0.17 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12 Taxes, 911, and Other Charges 2.28 2.20 2.11 2.44 2.32 2.30 2.29 2.30 2.33 2.44 2.36 2.46 2.38 2.57 2.53 2.81 2.70 Total Connection Charge $49.25 $47.55 $46.60 $47.26 $47.15 $45.57 $45.01 $44.92 $44.46 $43.58 $43.70 $43.67 $43.74 $43.95 $44.10 $42.95 $42.39 Additional Charge if Drop Line and Connection Block
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend605.pdf
  • 3.68 110 4 851 28 1998 24,250 4,477 14,726 0.61 3.29 64 2 921 36 1999 28,515 5,305 14,980 0.53 2.82 57 2 1,216 31 2000 30,135 5,742 14,909 0.49 2.60 33 1 1,480 251 2001 33,287 6,265 11,380 0.34 1.82 10 * 1,419 199 2002 35,064 5,926 9,956 0.28 1.64 ** ** 988 113 2003 42,664 7,350 8,944 0.21 1.22 ** ** 620 156 * Denotes revenues less than $500,000. ** Data not filed. 1 Billed revenues in Table 6.1 differ from billed revenues in Table 6.3. The amounts shown here represent charges to end-user customers and equal the amounts billed by underlying carriers plus estimated reseller markups. The amounts shown in Table 6.3 are the amounts reported by the
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend801.pdf
  • 1.70 2.00 2.12 2.15 2.29 2.31 2.41 2.40 2.42 2.39 2.48 2.57 Total Monthly Charge $17.70 $18.18 $18.11 $19.05 $19.24 $19.77 $19.72 $19.95 $19.81 $20.01 $19.95 $19.88 $19.76 $19.93 $20.78 Basic Connection Charge $45.63 $44.04 $42.94 $43.06 $43.06 $42.00 $41.50 $41.38 $41.28 $40.91 $41.11 $41.04 $41.24 $41.26 $41.45 Additional Connection Charge for Touch-Tone Service 1.34 1.31 1.55 1.76 1.77 1.27 1.22 1.23 0.85 0.23 0.23 0.17 0.12 0.12 0.12 Taxes, 911, and Other Charges 2.28 2.20 2.11 2.44 2.32 2.30 2.29 2.30 2.33 2.44 2.36 2.46 2.38 2.57 2.53 Total Connection Charge $49.25 $47.55 $46.60 $47.26 $47.15 $45.57 $45.01 $44.92 $44.46 $43.58 $43.70 $43.67 $43.74 $43.95 $44.10 Additional Charge if Drop Line and Connection Block Needed NA NA $6.04 $6.07 $6.89
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend803.pdf
  • 2.40 2.42 2.39 2.48 2.57 3.03 3.14 Total Monthly Charge $17.70 $18.18 $18.11 $19.05 $19.24 $19.77 $19.72 $19.95 $19.81 $20.01 $19.95 $19.88 $19.76 $19.93 $20.78 $22.62 $23.38 Basic Connection Charge $45.63 $44.04 $42.94 $43.06 $43.06 $42.00 $41.50 $41.38 $41.28 $40.91 $41.11 $41.04 $41.24 $41.26 $41.45 $40.02 $39.57 Additional Connection Charge for Touch- Tone Service 1.34 1.31 1.55 1.76 1.77 1.27 1.22 1.23 0.85 0.23 0.23 0.17 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12 Taxes, 911, and Other Charges 2.28 2.20 2.11 2.44 2.32 2.30 2.29 2.30 2.33 2.44 2.36 2.46 2.38 2.57 2.53 2.81 2.70 Total Connection Charge $49.25 $47.55 $46.60 $47.26 $47.15 $45.57 $45.01 $44.92 $44.46 $43.58 $43.70 $43.67 $43.74 $43.95 $44.10 $42.95 $42.39 Additional Charge if Drop Line and Connection Block
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Intl/itltrd98.pdf
  • 1.60 1.61 1966 2/ 32 100 48 53 19 30 3.10 1.47 1.63 1.59 1.61 1967 2/ 40 114 55 60 23 32 2.88 1.38 1.50 1.36 1.45 1968 46 127 62 65 28 40 2.73 1.33 1.41 1.42 1.41 1969 65 172 83 89 38 52 2.66 1.28 1.38 1.35 1.37 1970 81 197 99 98 51 60 2.43 1.22 1.21 1.17 1.19 1971 101 237 121 117 68 75 2.35 1.20 1.16 1.10 1.13 1972 127 292 148 144 92 99 2.31 1.17 1.14 1.08 1.11 1973 159 365 184 180 112 120 2.29 1.16 1.13 1.08 1.11 1974 191 429 217 212 142 152 2.25 1.14 1.11 1.07 1.09 1975 219 490 247 243 167 177 2.23 1.13
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Intl/itltrd99.pdf
  • 1.60 1.61 1966 2/ 32 100 48 53 19 30 3.10 1.47 1.63 1.59 1.61 1967 2/ 40 114 55 60 23 32 2.88 1.38 1.50 1.36 1.45 1968 46 127 62 65 28 40 2.73 1.33 1.41 1.42 1.41 1969 65 172 83 89 38 52 2.66 1.28 1.38 1.35 1.37 1970 81 197 99 98 51 60 2.43 1.22 1.21 1.17 1.19 1971 101 237 121 117 68 75 2.35 1.20 1.16 1.10 1.13 1972 127 292 148 144 92 99 2.31 1.17 1.14 1.08 1.11 1973 159 365 184 180 112 120 2.29 1.16 1.13 1.08 1.11 1974 191 429 217 212 142 152 2.25 1.14 1.11 1.07 1.09 1975 219 490 247 243 167 177 2.23 1.13
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Intl/itrnd00.pdf
  • 1.46 1.61 1.60 1.61 1966 32.3 100.1 47.6 52.5 18.9 30.1 3.10 1.47 1.63 1.59 1.61 1967 39.7 114.2 54.6 59.6 23.4 31.8 2.88 1.38 1.50 1.36 1.45 1968 46.4 126.9 61.5 65.4 28.2 40.0 2.73 1.33 1.41 1.42 1.41 1969 64.6 172.0 82.7 89.4 38.3 51.6 2.66 1.28 1.38 1.35 1.37 1970 81.1 196.6 98.9 97.7 51.0 59.8 2.43 1.22 1.21 1.17 1.19 1971 100.9 237.4 120.7 116.6 68.4 75.1 2.35 1.20 1.16 1.10 1.13 1972 126.5 291.8 148.2 143.6 91.7 98.6 2.31 1.17 1.14 1.08 1.11 1973 159.3 364.9 184.4 180.5 111.5 120.2 2.29 1.16 1.13 1.08 1.11 1974 190.7 428.7 216.6 212.1 142.0 152.2 2.25 1.14 1.11 1.07 1.09 1975 219.4 490.2 247.4 242.9 167.0 176.9 2.23 1.13
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Intl/itrnd01.pdf
  • 1.46 1.61 1.60 1.61 1966 32.3 100.1 47.6 52.5 18.9 30.1 3.10 1.47 1.63 1.59 1.61 1967 39.7 114.2 54.6 59.6 23.4 31.8 2.88 1.38 1.50 1.36 1.45 1968 46.4 126.9 61.5 65.4 28.2 40.0 2.73 1.33 1.41 1.42 1.41 1969 64.6 172.0 82.7 89.4 38.3 51.6 2.66 1.28 1.38 1.35 1.37 1970 81.1 196.6 98.9 97.7 51.0 59.8 2.43 1.22 1.21 1.17 1.19 1971 100.9 237.4 120.7 116.6 68.4 75.1 2.35 1.20 1.16 1.10 1.13 1972 126.5 291.8 148.2 143.6 91.7 98.6 2.31 1.17 1.14 1.08 1.11 1973 159.3 364.9 184.4 180.5 111.5 120.2 2.29 1.16 1.13 1.08 1.11 1974 190.7 428.7 216.6 212.1 142.0 152.2 2.25 1.14 1.11 1.07 1.09 1975 219.4 490.2 247.4 242.9 167.0 176.9 2.23 1.13
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr03-1.pdf
  • single-line business lines) + multiline business SLC per line per month * (multiline business lines) + non-primary lines * non-primary SLC per line per month]. Allocation percentage in each state is the ratio of the state's allocation revenues to nationwide revenues. SLC revenues are determined by multiplying the allocation factor by the type of revenues. (See Table 1.14.) In Table 1.22, interstate access revenues and private line revenues are allocated on a state- by-state basis based on net access revenues. Gross access revenues for allocation are the product of interstate access revenues from Table 2.10 of the 2001/2002 Statistics of Communications Common Carriers and the adjustment formula presented in Table 1.17. Revenues for allocation are the difference between gross access revenues
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr03-2.pdf
  • 13.00 13.00 American Samoa 7.75 7.75 7.75 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 7.75 7.75 7.75 7.75 7.75 7.75 Arizona 7.28 7.75 7.55 0.00 3.50 2.62 0.00 1.75 1.31 7.28 9.50 8.86 7.28 13.00 11.48 Arkansas 7.02 7.75 7.25 0.00 3.50 0.00 0.00 1.75 0.46 7.02 9.50 7.71 7.02 13.00 7.71 California 5.25 7.75 6.55 2.16 3.50 2.43 1.08 1.75 1.22 6.33 9.50 7.76 8.49 13.00 10.20 Colorado 7.75 7.75 7.75 0.00 3.50 3.49 0.00 1.75 1.75 7.75 9.50 9.50 7.75 13.00 12.99 Connecticut 6.10 7.53 7.53 1.16 1.16 1.16 0.58 0.58 0.58 6.68 8.11 8.11 7.84 9.27 9.27 Delaware 7.75 7.75 7.75 2.30 2.30 2.30 1.15 1.15 1.15 8.90 8.90 8.90 11.20 11.20 11.20 District of Columbia 5.61 5.61 5.61
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr03-3.pdf
  • 1.82 5.93 13.62 341025 C SHAWNEE TEL. CO. 14.97 1.56 13.20 42.98 341026 C HARRISONVILLE TEL. CO. 5.02 2.85 2.11 0.94 341029 A HENRY COUNTY TEL. CO. 10.37 -2.08 12.72 70.12 341032 C HOME TEL. CO.-ST. JACOB 2.94 9.08 -5.63 0.13 341036 C VERIZON NORTH INC.-IL (CONTEL) -26.66 1.13 -27.47 0.00 341037 C ILLINOIS CONSOLIDATED TEL. CO. (+341065A) -1.05 0.18 -1.22 -69.23 341038 C FRONTIER COMM. OF ILLINOIS, INC. -2.71 -1.01 -1.72 -39.62 341041 A KINSMAN MUTUAL TEL. CO. -0.44 -2.73 2.35 -3.25 341043 C LA HARPE TEL. CO. 2.66 -2.54 5.34 3.45 341045 C LEAF RIVER TEL. CO. 10.83 -2.95 14.20 16.65 341046 A LEONORE MUTUAL TEL. CO. 4.26 2.52 1.70 -0.18 341047 C MCDONOUGH TEL. COOP., INC. 11.04 -0.84
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr03-7.pdf
  • 2.41 2.40 2.42 2.39 2.48 2.57 3.03 3.14 Total Monthly Charge 17.70 18.18 18.11 19.05 19.24 19.77 19.72 19.95 19.81 20.01 19.95 19.88 19.76 19.93 20.78 22.62 23.38 Basic Connection Charge 45.63 44.04 42.94 43.06 43.06 42.00 41.50 41.38 41.28 40.91 41.11 41.04 41.24 41.26 41.45 40.02 39.57 Additional Connection Charge for Touch-Tone Service 1.34 1.31 1.55 1.76 1.77 1.27 1.22 1.23 0.85 0.23 0.23 0.17 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12 Taxes, 911, and Other Charges 2.28 2.20 2.11 2.44 2.32 2.30 2.29 2.30 2.33 2.44 2.36 2.46 2.38 2.57 2.53 2.81 2.70 Total Connection Charge 49.25 47.55 46.60 47.26 47.15 45.57 45.01 44.92 44.46 43.58 43.70 43.67 43.74 43.95 44.10 42.95 42.39 Additional Charge If Drop Line and Connection Block
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr03-intro.pdf
  • Total by Jurisdiction ...................... Table 3.15 High-Cost Support Payment Projections - Total by Study Area ........................Table 3.30 High-Cost Support Mechanisms ­ Payments per Loop by State ....................... Table 3.16 Income - Net ........................................................................................................... Table 11.5 Information for Allocating CLEC Revenues .............................................. Table 1.19 Information for Allocating Incumbent Local Exchange Revenues .....................Table 1.18 Information for Allocating Interstate Access Revenues .................................. Table 1.22 Information for Allocating Interstate Toll Revenues ...................................... Table 1.26 Information for Allocating Intrastate Access Revenues .................................. Table 1.23 Information for Allocating LEC Intrastate Toll Revenues ............................... Table 1.24 Information for Allocating Mobile Wireless Revenues .................................. Table 1.20 Information for Allocating Non-LEC Intrastate Toll Revenues ......................... Table 1.25 Information for Allocating SLC Revenues ................................................. Table 1.21 Installation, Maintenance, and Customer Complaints
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr04-1.pdf
  • single-line business lines) + multiline business SLC per line per month * (multiline business lines) + non-primary lines * non-primary SLC per line per month]. Allocation percentage in each state is the ratio of the state's allocation revenues to nationwide revenues. SLC revenues are determined by multiplying the allocation factor by the type of revenues (see Table 1.14). In Table 1.22, interstate access revenues and private line revenues are allocated on a state- by-state basis based on net access revenues. Gross access revenues for allocation are the product of interstate access revenues from Table 2.11 of the 2002/2003 Statistics of Communications Common Carriers and the adjustment formula presented in Table 1.17. Revenues for allocation are the difference between gross access revenues
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr04-2.pdf
  • 10.00 9.95 12.25 13.50 13.43 Virginia 7.16 8.25 7.72 0.00 3.50 2.97 0.00 1.75 1.48 7.16 10.00 9.21 7.16 13.50 12.17 Washington 5.85 8.25 7.89 0.00 3.50 1.73 0.00 1.75 0.87 5.85 10.00 8.76 5.85 13.50 10.49 West Virginia 6.50 8.25 8.25 0.00 3.50 2.67 0.00 1.75 1.33 6.50 10.00 9.58 6.50 13.50 12.25 Wisconsin 6.82 8.25 7.23 0.00 3.50 1.22 0.00 1.75 0.61 6.82 10.00 7.84 6.82 13.50 9.06 Wyoming 8.25 8.25 8.25 3.50 3.50 3.50 1.75 1.75 1.75 10.00 10.00 10.00 13.50 13.50 13.50 Nationwide $3.50 $8.25 $7.27 $0.00 $8.45 $2.68 $0.00 $1.75 $1.29 $3.50 $10.00 $8.55 $3.50 $18.45 $11.23 Note: This table reflects only non-tribal support. 1 Basic federal support includes both Tier 1 and Tier 2 support.
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr04-3.pdf
  • 0.00 0.00 0.04 0.04 0.41 0.04 0.63 Georgia 0.93 0.00 0.00 0.31 0.27 0.25 0.25 2.01 Guam 2.15 0.00 0.00 2.91 0.00 0.00 0.00 5.05 Hawaii 0.38 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.54 0.26 0.19 1.37 Idaho 2.41 0.01 0.00 0.41 0.50 1.76 0.87 5.97 Illinois 0.11 0.00 0.00 0.07 0.08 0.13 0.13 0.52 Indiana 0.19 0.00 0.00 0.12 0.13 0.57 0.21 1.22 Iowa 0.64 0.02 0.00 0.42 0.90 0.35 0.93 3.27 Kansas 3.24 0.01 0.00 0.65 0.93 0.39 0.73 5.96 Kentucky 0.77 0.01 0.12 0.19 0.34 0.70 0.20 2.33 Louisiana 1.73 0.00 0.00 0.56 0.21 0.34 0.23 3.08 Maine 0.68 0.00 0.55 0.58 0.42 0.01 0.79 3.04 Maryland 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.04 0.01 0.07 Massachusetts 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.01
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr04-7.pdf
  • 2.39 2.48 2.57 3.03 3.94 4.28 Total Monthly Charge 17.70 18.18 18.11 19.05 19.24 19.77 19.72 19.95 19.81 20.01 19.95 19.88 19.76 19.93 20.78 22.62 24.07 24.75 Basic Connection Charge 45.63 44.04 42.94 43.06 43.06 42.00 41.50 41.38 41.28 40.91 41.11 41.04 41.24 41.26 41.45 40.02 39.83 39.35 Additional Connection Charge for Touch-Tone Service 1.34 1.31 1.55 1.76 1.77 1.27 1.22 1.23 0.85 0.23 0.23 0.17 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12 **** **** Taxes, 911, and Other Charges 2.28 2.20 2.11 2.44 2.32 2.30 2.29 2.30 2.33 2.44 2.36 2.46 2.38 2.57 2.53 2.81 1.33 1.41 Total Connection Charge 49.25 47.55 46.60 47.26 47.15 45.57 45.01 44.92 44.46 43.58 43.70 43.67 43.74 43.95 44.10 42.95 41.16 40.76 Additional Charge If Drop Line
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr04-intro.pdf
  • and CLECs ..... Table 3.14 High-Cost Support Payment Projections - Total by Study Area ........................Table 3.29 High-Cost Support Mechanisms ­ Monthly Support per Loop by State .............. Table 3.15 Income - Net ........................................................................................................... Table 11.5 Information for Allocating CLEC Revenues .............................................. Table 1.19 Information for Allocating Incumbent Local Exchange Revenues .....................Table 1.18 Information for Allocating Interstate Access Revenues .................................. Table 1.22 Information for Allocating Interstate Toll ...................................................Table 1.26 Information for Allocating Intrastate Access Revenues .................................. Table 1.23 Information for Allocating LEC Intrastate Toll ............................................ Table 1.24 Information for Allocating Mobile Wireless Revenues .................................. Table 1.20 Information for Allocating Non-LEC Intrastate Toll ......................................Table 1.25 Information for Allocating SLC Revenues ................................................. Table 1.21 Installation, Maintenance, and Customer Complaints ............................................ Table 9.1 3 Index
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr98-7.pdf
  • Service 1.57 1.52 1.54 1.52 1.33 1.06 0.97 0.94 0.77 0.44 0.30 0.12 Taxes and 911 Charges 1.51 1.56 1.58 1.70 2.00 2.12 2.15 2.29 2.31 2.41 2.40 2.44 Total Monthly Charge 17.70 18.18 18.11 19.05 19.24 19.77 19.72 19.95 19.81 20.01 19.95 19.92 Basic Connection Charge $45.63$44.04$42.94$43.06$43.06$42.00$41.50$41.38$41.28$40.91$41.11$41.06 Additional Connection Charge for Touch-tone Service 1.34 1.31 1.55 1.76 1.77 1.27 1.22 1.23 0.85 0.23 0.23 0.17 Taxes 2.28 2.20 2.11 2.44 2.32 2.30 2.29 2.30 2.33 2.44 2.36 2.46 Total Connection Charge 46.97 45.35 44.49 44.82 44.83 45.57 42.72 44.92 44.46 43.58 43.70 43.68 Additional Charge if Drop Line and Connection Block Needed n.a. n.a. 6.04 6.07 6.89 6.89 6.50 7.29 6.74 5.90 5.74 5.65 Lowest-cost Inside Wiring Maintenance Plan $0.58
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrd99-7.pdf
  • 11 - 22Day 1.28 $1.40 9.4 1.28 1.82 42.0 Evening 0.76 0.80 5.3 0.76 1.82 139.1 Night & Weekend 0.51 0.65 27.5 0.51 1.82 256.4 23 - 55Day 1.60 $1.40 -12.5 1.60 1.82 13.6 Evening 0.96 0.80 -16.7 0.96 1.82 89.3 Night & Weekend 0.64 0.65 1.6 0.64 1.82 184.0 56 - 124Day 2.05 $1.40 -31.7 2.05 1.82 -11.3 Evening 1.22 0.80 -34.4 1.22 1.82 49.0 Night & Weekend 0.82 0.65 -20.7 0.82 1.82 121.6 125 - 292Day 2.14 $1.40 -34.6 2.14 1.82 -15.1 Evening 1.28 0.80 -37.5 1.28 1.82 42.0 Night & Weekend 0.85 0.65 -23.5 0.85 1.82 113.8 293 - 430Day 2.27 $1.40 -38.3 2.27 1.82 -19.9 Evening 1.36 0.80 -41.2 1.36 1.82 33.6 Night & Weekend 0.90 0.65
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrd99-9.pdf
  • 46.2 437.5 301.2 354.8 351.0 For Unscheduled Events Over 2 Minutes 105.9 192.8 221.4 96.3 15.2 511.2 205.9 336.7 344.1 For Unscheduled Downtime More than 2 Minutes Number of Occurrences or Events 82 25 114 41 14 144 128 288 117 Events per Hundred Switches 5.8 1.8 6.9 3.2 1.7 16.5 8.4 6.6 7.1 Events per Million Access Lines 4.19 1.22 5.18 2.31 0.68 10.21 8.31 16.56 16.82 Average Outage Duration in Minutes 30.3 181.2 53.4 49.9 15.0 51.6 40.8 85.7 81.3 Average Lines Affected per Event in Thousands 15.8 23.2 14.4 15.2 29.8 12.3 7.3 5.2 5.5 Outage Line-Minutes per Event in Thousands 218.5 914.5 384.4 316.6 136.7 459.8 218.7 171.4 219.8 Outage Line-Minutes per 1,000 Access Lines 916.4 1,111.7
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrj99-7.pdf
  • Other Mandatory Payments 1.51 1.56 1.58 1.70 2.00 2.12 2.15 2.29 2.31 2.41 2.40 2.42 2.44 Total Monthly Charge 17.70 18.18 18.11 19.05 19.24 19.77 19.72 19.95 19.81 20.01 19.95 19.88 19.85 Basic Connection Charge 45.63 44.04 42.94 43.06 43.06 42.00 41.50 41.38 41.28 40.91 41.11 41.04 41.31 Additional Connection Charge for Touch-tone Service 1.34 1.31 1.55 1.76 1.77 1.27 1.22 1.23 0.85 0.23 0.23 0.17 0.12 Other Mandatory Payments 2.28 2.20 2.11 2.44 2.32 2.30 2.29 2.30 2.33 2.44 2.36 2.46 2.40 Total Connection Charge 49.25 47.55 46.60 47.26 47.15 45.57 45.01 44.92 44.46 43.58 43.70 43.67 43.83 Additional Charge if Drop Line and Connection Block Needed n.a. n.a. 6.04 6.07 6.89 6.89 6.50 7.29 6.74 5.90 5.74 5.65 5.64
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrs00-0.pdf
  • 1.51 1.56 1.58 1.70 2.00 2.12 2.15 2.29 2.31 2.41 2.40 2.42 2.39 2.45 Total Monthly Charge 17.70 18.18 18.11 19.05 19.24 19.77 19.72 19.95 19.81 20.01 19.95 19.88 19.76 19.87 Basic Connection Charge 45.63 44.04 42.94 43.06 43.06 42.00 41.50 41.38 41.28 40.91 41.11 41.04 41.24 41.24 Additional Connection Charge for Touch-tone Service 1.34 1.31 1.55 1.76 1.77 1.27 1.22 1.23 0.85 0.23 0.23 0.17 0.12 0.12 Taxes, 911 and Other Charges 2.28 2.20 2.11 2.44 2.32 2.30 2.29 2.30 2.33 2.44 2.36 2.46 2.38 2.52 Total Connection Charge 49.25 47.55 46.60 47.26 47.15 45.57 45.01 44.92 44.46 43.58 43.70 43.67 43.74 43.88 Additional Charge if Drop Line and Connection Block Needed n.a. n.a. 6.04 6.07 6.89 6.89 6.50 7.29
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrs01-0.pdf
  • 5.74 -4.85 -100.00 250302 C ALLTEL ALABAMA 0.28 4.29 -3.84 -13.41 250304 C MILLRY TEL. CO., INC. -1.27 3.57 -4.67 -10.06 250305 C MON-CRE TEL. COOP. INC. -2.55 2.46 -4.89 -20.31 250306 C FRONTIER COMM. OF AL, INC. 3.81 3.84 -0.03 -18.25 250307 A MOUNDVILLE TEL. CO. 4.87 5.68 -0.77 0.00 250308 A NEW HOPE TEL. COOP., INC.-AL 3.92 2.67 1.22 0.00 250311 A OAKMAN TEL. CO., INC. 9.85 1.75 7.96 63.35 250312 A OTELCO TELEPHONE LLC 20.65 7.73 12.00 0.00 250314 C PEOPLES TEL. CO. 4.46 4.22 0.23 1.75 250315 C PINE BELT TEL. CO. 20.25 5.81 13.65 37.17 250316 C RAGLAND TEL. CO. 7.83 1.82 5.90 11.22 250317 A ROANOKE TEL. CO., INC. 6.80 2.21 4.49 0.00 250318 C
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrs02-0.pdf
  • by Jurisdiction ...................... Table 3.13 High-Cost Support Payment Projections - Total by Study Area ....................... Table 3.31 High-Cost Support Mechanisms ­ Net Dollar Flow by State ......................... Table 3.19 Income - Net ........................................................................................................... Table 11.5 Information for Allocating CLEC Revenues .............................................. Table 1.19 Information for Allocating Incumbent Local Exchange Revenues .....................Table 1.18 Information for Allocating Interstate Access Revenues .................................. Table 1.22 Information for Allocating Interstate Toll Revenues ...................................... Table 1.26 Information for Allocating Intrastate Access Revenues .................................. Table 1.23 Information for Allocating LEC Intrastate Toll Revenues ............................... Table 1.24 Information for Allocating Mobile Wireless Revenues .................................. Table 1.20 Information for Allocating Non-LEC Intrastate Toll Revenues ......................... Table 1.25 3 Index of Tables and Charts Information for Allocating SLC Revenues ................................................. Table
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/QualSvc/qual98.pdf
  • 46.2 437.5 301.2 354.8 351.0 For Unscheduled Events Over 2 Minutes 105.9 192.8 221.4 96.3 15.2 511.2 205.9 336.7 344.1 For Unscheduled Downtime More than 2 Minutes Number of Occurrences or Events 82 25 114 41 14 144 128 288 117 Events per Hundred Switches 5.8 1.8 6.9 3.2 1.7 16.5 8.4 6.6 7.1 Events per Million Access Lines 4.19 1.22 5.18 2.31 0.68 10.21 8.31 16.56 16.82 Average Outage Duration in Minutes 30.3 181.2 53.4 49.9 15.0 51.6 40.8 85.7 81.3 Average Lines Affected per Event in Thousands 15.8 23.2 14.4 15.2 29.8 12.3 7.3 5.2 5.5 Outage Line-Minutes per Event in Thousands 218.5 914.5 384.4 316.6 136.7 459.8 218.7 171.4 219.8 Outage Line-Minutes per 1,000 Access Lines 916.4 1,111.7
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/SOCC/00socc.pdf
  • 1.35 1.30 1.25 1.20 1.20 1.20 1.20 1.00 0.92 0.92 Hong Kong 2.35 2.20 1.90 1.60 1.20 1.00 1.00 0.94 0.79 0.72 0.14 0.13 0.12 India 2.25 2.25 2.25 2.00 1.90 1.80 1.80 1.60 1.42 1.28 1.08 0.85 0.85 Israel 10/ 2.40 2.40 2.40 2.28 2.16 2.16 1.90 1.18 0.70 0.59 0.30 0.30 0.30 Italy 2.15 2.14 2.04 1.65 1.51 1.22 0.71 0.52 0.33 0.22 0.22 0.21 0.20 Jamaica 1.75 1.65 1.60 1.55 1.50 1.40 1.40 1.30 1.25 1.25 1.05 0.60 0.38 Japan 10/ 1.76 1.91 1.62 1.31 1.04 0.94 0.94 0.91 0.86 0.29 0.29 0.27 0.26 Korea, Rep. 2.36 2.10 1.90 1.60 1.44 1.41 1.26 1.23 0.98 0.85 0.71 0.51 0.38 Mexico 11/ 0.89 0.791 0.75 0.715 0.68 0.58 0.53
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/SOCC/01socc.pdf
  • 1.35 1.30 1.25 1.20 1.20 1.20 1.20 1.00 0.92 0.70 0.70 Hong Kong 2.20 1.90 1.60 1.20 1.00 1.00 0.94 0.79 0.72 0.14 0.13 0.13 0.13 India 2.25 2.25 2.00 1.90 1.80 1.80 1.60 1.42 1.28 1.08 0.85 0.85 0.85 Israel 10/ 2.40 2.40 2.28 2.16 2.16 1.90 1.18 0.70 0.59 0.30 0.30 0.30 0.30 Italy 2.14 2.04 1.65 1.51 1.22 0.71 0.52 0.33 0.22 0.22 0.20 0.20 0.20 Jamaica 1.65 1.60 1.55 1.50 1.40 1.40 1.30 1.25 1.25 1.05 0.60 0.38 0.38 Japan 10/ 1.91 1.62 1.31 1.04 0.94 0.94 0.91 0.86 0.29 0.29 0.27 0.27 0.27 Korea, Rep. 2.10 1.90 1.60 1.44 1.41 1.26 1.23 0.98 0.85 0.71 0.51 0.38 0.38 Mexico 11/ 0.79 0.75 0.72 0.68 0.58 0.53
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/SOCC/02socc.pdf
  • 1.20 1.20 1.20 1.20 1.00 0.92 0.70 0.60 0.46 Hong Kong 9/ 1.90 1.60 1.20 1.00 1.00 0.94 0.79 0.72 0.14 0.13 0.13 0.13 0.14 India 2.25 2.00 1.90 1.80 1.80 1.60 1.42 1.28 1.08 0.85 0.68 0.46 0.46 Israel 8/ 9/ 2.40 2.28 2.16 2.16 1.90 1.18 0.70 0.59 0.30 0.30 0.30 0.30 0.30 Italy 9/ 2.04 1.65 1.51 1.22 0.71 0.52 0.33 0.22 0.22 0.21 0.20 0.21 0.22 Jamaica 8/ 9/ 1.60 1.55 1.50 1.40 1.40 1.30 1.25 1.25 1.05 0.60 0.38 0.38 0.38 Japan 8/ 9/ 1.62 1.31 1.04 0.94 0.94 0.91 0.86 0.29 0.29 0.27 0.27 0.28 0.29 Korea, Rep. 8/ 9/ 1.90 1.60 1.44 1.41 1.26 1.23 0.98 0.85 0.71 0.51 0.38 0.38 0.38 Mexico 8/
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/SOCC/03socc.pdf
  • 1.01 0.86 0.55 0.30 Guatemala 1.40 1.30 1.20 1.18 1.00 0.90 0.77 0.64 0.51 Haiti 1.35 1.30 1.25 1.20 1.20 1.20 1.20 1.00 0.92 0.70 0.60 0.46 Hong Kong 1.60 1.20 1.00 1.00 0.94 0.79 0.72 India 2.00 1.90 1.80 1.80 1.60 1.42 1.28 1.08 0.85 0.68 0.46 0.46 Israel 2.28 2.16 2.16 1.90 1.18 0.70 0.59 Italy 1.65 1.51 1.22 0.71 0.52 0.33 Jamaica 1.55 1.50 1.40 1.40 1.30 1.25 1.25 1.05 0.60 Japan 1.31 1.04 0.94 0.94 0.91 0.86 Korea, Rep. 1.60 1.44 1.41 1.26 1.23 0.98 0.85 0.71 0.51 Mexico 7/ 0.72 0.68 0.58 0.53 0.485 0.395 0.37 0.19 0.19 0.19 0.19 0.19 Morocco 3.03 3.04 3.27 1.78 1.45 1.09 0.83 0.82 0.77 0.38 Netherlands 0.69 0.69 0.59
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/SOCC/95socc.pdf
  • 1.09 0.99 8AM-5PM 5PM-11PM 11PM-8AM 8AM-5PM 5PM-11PM 11PM-8AM BAHAMAS INTERNATIONAL DIAL 1.28 0.92 0.84 1.14 0.84 0.76 ALL OTHER* 1.30 1.09 0.99 1.19 1.05 0.99 7AM-1PM 1PM-6PM 6PM-7AM 7AM-1PM 1PM-6PM 6PM-7AM BELGIUM INTERNATIONAL DIAL 1.84 1.17 1.03 1.65 1.04 0.94 ALL OTHER* 2.10 1.58 1.26 1.67 1.06 0.95 8AM-5PM 5PM-11PM 11PM-8AM 8AM-5PM 5PM-11PM 11PM-8AM BERMUDA INTERNATIONAL DIAL 1.34 1.02 0.94 1.22 0.94 0.85 ALL OTHER* 1.44 1.19 1.09 1.29 1.19 1.05 8AM-6PM 6PM-MIDN MIDN-8AM 8AM-6PM 6PM-MIDN MIDN-8AM BRAZIL INTERNATIONAL DIAL 2.00 1.49 1.24 1.78 1.33 1.10 ALL OTHER* 2.84 2.14 1.77 1.79 1.59 1.29 8AM-6PM 6PM-MIDN MIDN-8AM 8AM-6PM 6PM-MIDN MIDN-8AM CHILE INTERNATIONAL DIAL 1.91 1.44 1.27 1.70 1.28 1.13 ALL OTHER* 2.96 2.39 2.03 1.48 1.09 0.94 5PM-2AM 2AM-11AM 11AM-5PM 5PM-2AM
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/SOCC/96socc.pdf
  • 1.05 1975 12/ 2.16 4.16 1.40 2.70 0.86 1.66 1.90 3.65 1.24 2.37 0.76 1.46 1.40 2.65 0.91 1.72 0.56 1.06 1976 13/ 2.06 3.96 1.34 2.57 0.82 1.58 1.86 3.56 1.21 2.31 0.74 1.42 1.55 2.95 1.01 1.92 0.62 1.18 1977 14/ 2.06 3.96 1.34 2.57 0.82 1.58 1.86 3.56 1.21 2.31 0.74 1.42 1.59 3.04 1.03 1.98 0.64 1.22 1978 2.06 3.96 1.34 2.57 0.82 1.58 1.86 3.56 1.21 2.31 0.74 1.42 1.59 3.04 1.03 1.98 0.64 1.22 1979 2.06 3.96 1.34 2.57 0.82 1.58 1.86 3.56 1.21 2.31 0.74 1.42 1.59 3.04 1.03 1.98 0.64 1.22 1980 15/ 2.17 4.17 1.41 2.71 0.87 1.67 1.97 3.77 1.28 2.45 0.79 1.51 1.65 3.15 1.07 2.05 0.66 1.26 1981 16/
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/SOCC/97socc.pdf
  • 0.96 BERMUDA 1.40 1.16PAKISTAN 4.64 3.05 BRAZIL 2.07 1.51PANAMA, REPUBLIC OF 1.97 1.51 CHILE 1.96 1.54PERU 2.24 1.57 CHINA, PEOPLE'S REPUBLIC OF 2.92 2.26PHILIPPINES 2.44 1.64 COLOMBIA 2.09 1.53POLAND, REPUBLIC OF 1.77 1.42 COSTA RICA 1.85 1.38PORTUGAL (INCLUDING AZORES 1.85 1.20 DENMARK 1.64 1.08 AND MADEIRA ISLANDS) DOMINICAN REPUBLIC 1.78 1.49SAUDI ARABIA 2.36 1.85 ECUADOR 2.08 1.71SINGAPORE, REPUBLIC OF 1.85 1.22 EGYPT, ARAB REPUBLIC OF 2.44 1.97SOUTH AFRICA, REPUBLIC OF 1.97 1.48 EL SALVADOR 1.96 1.59SPAIN (INCLUDING BALEARIC 1.82 1.24 FRANCE 1.50 0.96 ISLANDS, CANARY ISLANDS, GERMANY, FEDERAL REPUBLIC OF 1.40 0.92 CEUTA AND MELILLA) (INCLUDING FORMER GERMAN SWEDEN 1.48 0.96 DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC) SWITZERLAND 1.58 0.98 GREECE 2.19 1.47TAIWAN 2.24 1.36 GUAM 2.19 1.07THAILAND 2.26 1.42 GUATEMALA 1.98 1.58TRINIDAD & TOBAGO,
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/SOCC/98SOCC.PDF
  • 23,123 1,542 COSTS & EXPENSES 4,305 12,961 1/ 45,736 24,938 17,219 1,364 INTEREST EXPENSE 264 611 427 1,335 837 112 OTHER INCOME & ADJUSTMENTS 2/ 347 2,055 2,410 (352) 684 13 INCOME TAXES 447 2,031 3,072 2,008 2,224 22 NET INCOME 525 3,606 6,398 2,933 3,527 57 EARNINGS PER SHARE 1.91 3.27 3.59 1.89 1.79 0.22 DIVIDENDS PER SHARE 1.18 1.22 1.32 1.54 0.73 0 AVG. SHARES OUTSTANDING (MIL.) 274 1,102 1,800 1,578 1,970 259 TOTAL ASSETS 9,374 30,299 59,550 55,144 39,410 5,293 PROPERTY, PLANT & EQUIP. (NET) 4,828 14,305 26,903 36,816 23,940 4,049 LONG-TERM DEBT 3,492 5,557 5,556 17,646 8,715 1,900 SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY 3,271 10,897 25,522 13,025 16,110 1,793 OPERATING DATA: CUSTOMER LINES (THOUS.) 1,890 20,968 - 41,600 24,025 952
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/SOCC/99socc.pdf
  • 1.26 1.01 0.86 0.55 0.30 0.29 Guatemala 1.50 1.50 1.40 1.30 1.20 1.18 1.00 0.90 0.77 0.64 0.58 Hong Kong 2.20 1.90 1.60 1.20 1.00 1.00 0.94 0.79 0.72 0.14 0.13 India 2.25 2.25 2.00 1.90 1.80 1.80 1.60 1.42 1.28 1.08 1.08 Israel 2.40 2.40 2.28 2.16 2.16 1.90 1.18 0.70 0.59 0.30 0.30 Italy 2.14 2.04 1.65 1.51 1.22 0.71 0.52 0.33 0.22 0.22 0.21 Jamaica 1.65 1.60 1.55 1.50 1.40 1.40 1.30 1.25 1.25 1.05 0.80 Japan 1.91 1.62 1.31 1.04 0.94 0.94 0.91 0.86 0.29 0.29 0.28 Korea, Rep. 2.10 1.90 1.60 1.44 1.41 1.26 1.23 0.98 0.85 0.71 0.51 Mexico $.791/0.25 $.75/0.25$.715/0.25 $.68/0.25 $.58/0.25 $.53/0.28$.485/0.32$.395/.395 $.37/.37 $.19/.19 $.19/.19 Netherlands 1.56 1.29 0.69 0.69 0.59 0.37 0.36
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/SOCC/prelim02socc.pdf
  • 1.20 1.20 1.20 1.20 1.00 0.92 0.70 0.60 0.46 Hong Kong 10/ 1.90 1.60 1.20 1.00 1.00 0.94 0.79 0.72 0.14 0.13 0.13 0.13 0.14 India 2.25 2.00 1.90 1.80 1.80 1.60 1.42 1.28 1.08 0.85 0.68 0.46 0.46 Israel 8/ 10/ 2.40 2.28 2.16 2.16 1.90 1.18 0.70 0.59 0.30 0.30 0.30 0.30 0.30 Italy 10/ 2.04 1.65 1.51 1.22 0.71 0.52 0.33 0.22 0.22 0.21 0.20 0.21 0.22 Jamaica 8/ 10/ 1.60 1.55 1.50 1.40 1.40 1.30 1.25 1.25 1.05 0.60 0.38 0.38 0.38 Japan 8/ 10/ 1.62 1.31 1.04 0.94 0.94 0.91 0.86 0.29 0.29 0.27 0.27 0.28 0.29 Korea, Rep. 8/ 10/ 1.90 1.60 1.44 1.41 1.26 1.23 0.98 0.85 0.71 0.51 0.38 0.38 0.38 Mexico 8/
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Orders/2000/fcc00353.doc
  • space-to-Earth transmissions from deep space. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 2.1, 2.105(d)(4). The inter-satellite service is a radiocommunication service providing links between artificial satellites. At the 1992 World Administrative Radio Communications Conference, the definition for the inter-satellite service was amended by changing the phrase "artificial earth satellites" to "artificial satellites." See ITU Radio Regulations, Edition of 1998, Volume 1E, Article S1, S1.22. We are updating our definition in 47 C.F.R. § 2.1 to conform to this WARC-92 amendment. See Appendix, footnote S5.548. At WARC-95, former international footnote 893 was re-numbered as S5.548. Previously, at WARC-92, the footnote was amended to include reference to the space research service (deep space) at 31.8-32.3 GHz. In the United States, radio spectrum may be allocated to
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Orders/2000/da000025.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Orders/2000/da000025.txt
  • is demonstrated in the letters between Murray and Media Services, copies of which are attached to Murray's opposition pleading. The letters show that Media Services was indeed acting in a representative capacity for Newport and that Murray dealt with Media Services in that capacity. On this basis, we recognize it as a proper representative of Newport, as permitted by Section 1.22, and will not ask Media Services to show its authority to so act. Moreover, Section 1.21(a), cited by Murray as a basis for dismissing the petition, is not mandatory. It states that ``any party may appear before the Commission in person or by an attorney. [emphasis added]'' Second, we recognize that Section 1.52 requires that a party not represented by
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/OSEC/library/legislative_histories/43.pdf
  • The 30 largest holders in whose names stood 887,505 shares accounted for 13.87 percent of the total voting securities. The largest holder was the Sun Life Assurance Co. of Canada, which held 98,275 shares or 1.54 percent of the voting power. The only directors included among the 30 largest stockholders were Clarence H. Mackay and Edward J. Berwind, who held 1.22 and 0.76 percent, respectively. No general officer of the company was included among the 30 largest holders. The outstanding stock was held in average amounts of 56.14 shares by 98,169 parties. At the stockholders' meeting of May 10, 1933, there were voted 3,653,561 shares, or 57.09 percent of the total voting power. Of this number only 193 shares were voted
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Orders/2000/fcc00033.doc
  • need or prefer to employ small antennas because most potential antenna sites, such as rooftops, monopoles, and electrical transmission towers, cannot support large microwave dishes, due to either space limitations or aesthetic objections of homeowner associations or zoning boards. Our rules, however, do not permit antennas smaller than 0.61 meters (2 feet) in diameter in the 23 GHz band, or 1.22 meters (4 feet) in diameter in the 10 GHz band. TIA believes that the existing antenna size restrictions deter fixed microwave service use of these bands. It recommends permitting 0.46-meter (18-inch) or 0.30 meter (1-foot) high performance antennas in the 23 GHz band, and 0.61-meter (2-foot) or 1.22-meter (4-foot) antennas in the 10 GHz band. . To permit 0.46-meter (18-inch)
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireline_Competition/Orders/2002/fcc02118.pdf
  • PR-8-02-5000 Open Orders in a Hold Status > 90 Days 0 0 0 0 0 0 11.58 0 4.18 0 MAINTENANCE MR-2 ­ Trouble Report Rate MR-2-01-5000 Network Trouble Report Rate 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.02 0 0.03 MR-4 ­ Trouble Duration Intervals MR-4-01-5000 Mean Time To Repair ­ Total NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 1.22 NA 2.06 d,e MR-4-04-5000 % Cleared (all troubles) within 24 Hours NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 100 NA 100 d,e MR-4-05-5000 % Out of Service > 2 Hours NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 0 NA 33.33 d,e MR-4-06-5000 % Out of Service > 4 Hours NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 0 NA 0 d,e
• http://www.fcc.gov/Speeches/Furchtgott_Roth/Statements/sthfr817.html http://www.fcc.gov/Speeches/Furchtgott_Roth/Statements/sthfr817.wp
  • say with certainty. Commission orders last year set caps of $2.25 billion annually for schools and libraries. For the second quarter of 1997, we have imposed a 0.71 percent tax on all telecomm services, both interstate and intrastate, to support schools and libraries programs for an amount of $1.3 billion annual rate. The $2.25 billion annual rate would require a 1.22 percent tax on all telecommunications. Moreover, as I explain below, I have substantial doubts about our authority to tax intrastate services directly or even to use them as a basis for taxes. To support fully the promised schools and libraries program with just interstate telecommunications service revenue would require a tax rate of 3.2 percent. The Commission has thus set
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-307314A1.html
  • the Enforcement Bureau's San Juan Office ("San Juan Office") conducted an investigation in the San Juan area. On April 28, 2011 and May 5, 2011, agents from the San Juan Office confirmed by direction finding techniques that radio emissions on the frequency 5.585 GHz were emanating from the rooftop of the City View Plaza Building in Guaynabo at 18-o 25' 1.22" N 66-o 6' 33.09" W, the location of two of your Unlicensed National Information Infrastructure ("U-NII") devices, Rocket M5s manufactured by Ubiquiti Networks, Inc. with FCC ID SWX-M5. On May 11, 2011 and May 16, 2011, agents from the San Juan Office confirmed by direction finding techniques that radio emissions on the frequencies 5.625 GHz and 5635 GHz were emanating
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-12-2A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-12-2A1.pdf
  • 210 1.10 1.10 1.20 211 - 220 0.50 1.10 0.80 221 - 230 1.00 0.90 1.10 231 - 240 0.90 1.00 1.80 241 - 250 1.40 1.40 1.00 251 - 260 0.90 1.70 1.40 261 - 270 0.70 2.10 2.30 271 - 280 0.40 0.50 0.30 281 - 290 1.00 1.20 1.40 > 290 0.50 1.18 0.67 > 200 0.85 1.22 1.20 Table 3 presents additional information on the distribution of LPFM stations within markets. As demonstrated, about one-third of markets do not have any LPFM stations. In 2005, over 88 percent of the Arbitron Metros had less than 3 LPFM stations physically located in the market. In 2007 and 2009, it was still the case that more than 80 percent
• http://www.fcc.gov/ib/sand/agree/files/mex-bc/am.pdf
  • in the network shall not exceed LO@ ukroseconds,when measured at either transmftter site. StatiOU wwer L.16 I.17 Unmodulated carr-fer power supplied to the antenna. Groundwave Electromagnetic wave vhfch is propagated aloag the surface of the Earth or near it and which hasnot been rEElected by the ionosphere, 1.18 1.19 10% of the 1.20 SO% of the 1.21 horizontal conducting antenna. 1.22 Skywave Electromagnetic wave which has been reflected by the ionosphere= Skywave field strength, 10% of the time The value of a skywave stgnal vhlch is not exceeded for nmre than period of observation. Skyvave field strength, SO% of the time The value of a skyvave signal which Fs not exceeded for more than period of observation. Characteristic field strength (E,)
• http://www.fcc.gov/ib/sand/mniab/traffic/files/ITRND01.pdf
  • 1.46 1.61 1.60 1.61 1966 32.3 100.1 47.6 52.5 18.9 30.1 3.10 1.47 1.63 1.59 1.61 1967 39.7 114.2 54.6 59.6 23.4 31.8 2.88 1.38 1.50 1.36 1.45 1968 46.4 126.9 61.5 65.4 28.2 40.0 2.73 1.33 1.41 1.42 1.41 1969 64.6 172.0 82.7 89.4 38.3 51.6 2.66 1.28 1.38 1.35 1.37 1970 81.1 196.6 98.9 97.7 51.0 59.8 2.43 1.22 1.21 1.17 1.19 1971 100.9 237.4 120.7 116.6 68.4 75.1 2.35 1.20 1.16 1.10 1.13 1972 126.5 291.8 148.2 143.6 91.7 98.6 2.31 1.17 1.14 1.08 1.11 1973 159.3 364.9 184.4 180.5 111.5 120.2 2.29 1.16 1.13 1.08 1.11 1974 190.7 428.7 216.6 212.1 142.0 152.2 2.25 1.14 1.11 1.07 1.09 1975 219.4 490.2 247.4 242.9 167.0 176.9 2.23 1.13
• http://www.fcc.gov/mb/peer_review/prlpfm_rpt_economic_study.pdf
  • 0.80 0.90 101 -200 1.08 1.31 1.39 201 -210 1.10 1.10 1.20 211 -220 0.50 1.10 0.80 221 -230 1.00 0.90 1.10 231 -240 0.90 1.00 1.80 241 -250 1.40 1.40 1.00 251 -260 0.90 1.70 1.40 261 -270 0.70 2.10 2.30 271 -280 0.40 0.50 0.30 281 -290 1.00 1.20 1.40 > 290 0.50 1.18 0.67 > 200 0.85 1.22 1.20 24. Table 3 presents additional information on the distribution of LPFM stations within markets. As demonstrated, about one-third of markets do not have any LPFM stations. In 2005, over 88 percent of the Arbitron Metros had less than 3 LPFM stations physically located in the market. In 2007 and 2009, it was still the case that more than 80
• http://www.fcc.gov/omd/privacyact/System_of_records/pia-broadband-dead-zone-report.pdf
  • If the use of this information is both relevant and necessary to the processes for this information system is designed, please skip to Question 1.21. 1.20 If not, why or for what reasons is the information being collected? 1.21 Is the information covered under a Security Classification as determined by the FCC Security Officer? Yes No Please explain your response: 1.22 What are categories of individuals covered by the system of records notice (SORN)? 1.23 What are the categories of records, e.g., types of information (or records) that the system of records notice (SORN) collects, maintains, and uses? 1.24 What is the legal authority that authorizes the development of the information system and the information/data collection? 1.25 What are the purposes
• http://www.fcc.gov/omd/privacyact/System_of_records/pia-ccd.pdf
  • please skip to Question 1.21. 1.20 If not, why or for what reasons is the information being collected? 1.21 Is the information covered under a Security Classification as determined by the FCC Security Officer? Yes No Please explain your response: There is no government classified information included in the information that is collected by the two PSHSB Customer Comment Cards. 1.22 What is the legal authority that authorizes the development of the information system and the information/data collection? Sections 151, 152, 155, 257, 303 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. 151.152, 155, 257; and 5 U.S.C. 602(c) and 609(a)(3). 1.23 In what instances would the information system's administrator/manager/developer permit disclosure to those groups outside the FCC for
• http://www.fcc.gov/omd/privacyact/System_of_records/pia-core-financial.pdf
  • Security Classification as determined by the FCC Security Officer? Yes No Please explain your response: This information system is still in the development stage and has not been assigned a security classification by the FCC Security Officer. Once the information system is functional and ready to be used, e.g., "goes live," the information system will be assigned a security classification. 1.22 What is the legal authority that authorizes the development of the information system and the information/data collection? 31 U.S.C. 3302(e); 44 U.S.C. 3101, 3102, and 3309; Debt Collection Act as amended by the Debt Collection Improvement Act of 1996; Federal Financial Management Improvement Act of 1996; Chief Financial Officers Act of 1990; and Federal Managers Financial Integrity Act of 1982
• http://www.fcc.gov/omd/privacyact/System_of_records/pia-criminal-investigative-files.pdf
  • the use of this information is both relevant and necessary to the processes for this information system is designed, please skip to Question 1.21. 1.20 If not, why or for what reasons is the information being collected? 12 1.21 Is the information covered under a Security Classification as determined by the FCC Security Officer? Yes No Please explain your response: 1.22 What is the legal authority that authorizes the development of the information system and the information/data collection? 1.23 In what instances would the information system's administrator/manager/developer permit disclosure to those groups outside the FCC for whom the information was not initially intended. Such disclosures, which are referred to as "Routine Uses," are those instances that permit the FCC to disclose
• http://www.fcc.gov/omd/privacyact/System_of_records/pia-crisis.pdf
  • is no "extraneous" information included in the database(s) or paper files? Yes No Please explain your response: 11 If yes, please skip to Question 1.21. 1.20 If not, why or for what reasons is the information being collected? 1.21 Is the information covered under a Security Classification as determined by the FCC Security Officer? Yes No Please explain your response: 1.22 What is the legal authority that authorizes the development of the information system and the information/data collection? 1.23 In what instances would the information system's administrator/manager/developer permit disclosure to those groups outside the FCC for whom the information was not initially intended. Such disclosures, which are referred to as "Routine Uses," are those instances that permit the FCC to disclose
• http://www.fcc.gov/omd/privacyact/System_of_records/pia-dqc.pdf
  • If the use of this information is both relevant and necessary to the processes for this information system is designed, please skip to Question 1.21. 1.20 If not, why or for what reasons is the information being collected? 1.21 Is the information covered under a Security Classification as determined by the FCC Security Officer? Yes No Please explain your response: 1.22 What is the legal authority that authorizes the development of the information system and the information/data collection? 1.23 In what instances would the information system's administrator/manager/developer permit disclosure to those groups outside the FCC for whom the information was not initially intended. Such disclosures, which are referred to as "Routine Uses," 2 are those instances that permit the FCC to
• http://www.fcc.gov/omd/privacyact/System_of_records/pia-ecfs.pdf
  • If the use of this information is both relevant and necessary to the processes for this information system is designed, please skip to Question 1.21. 1.20 If not, why or for what reasons is the information being collected? 1.21 Is the information covered under a Security Classification as determined by the FCC Security Officer? Yes No Please explain your response: 1.22 What is the legal authority that authorizes the development of the information system and the information/data collection? 1.23 In what instances would the information system's administrator/manager/developer permit disclosure to those groups outside the FCC for whom the information was not initially intended. Such disclosures, which are referred to as "Routine Uses," 2 are those instances that permit the FCC to
• http://www.fcc.gov/omd/privacyact/System_of_records/pia-email.pdf
  • the use of this information is both relevant and necessary to the processes for this information system is designed, please skip to Question 1.21. 1.20 If not, why or for what reasons is the information being collected? 1.21 Is the information covered under a Security Classification as determined by the FCC Security Officer? Yes No Please explain your response: 12 1.22 What is the legal authority that authorizes the development of the information system and the information/data collection? 1.23 In what instances would the information system's administrator/manager/developer permit disclosure to those groups outside the FCC for whom the information was not initially intended. Such disclosures, which are referred to as "Routine Uses," 2 are those instances that permit the FCC to
• http://www.fcc.gov/omd/privacyact/System_of_records/pia-experimental-radio.pdf
  • the use of this information is both relevant and necessary to the processes for this information system is designed, please skip to Question 1.21. 1.20 If not, why or for what reasons is the information being collected? 1.21 Is the information covered under a Security Classification as determined by the FCC Security Officer? Yes No Please explain your response: 12 1.22 What is the legal authority that authorizes the development of the information system and the information/data collection? 1.23 In what instances would the information system's administrator/manager/developer permit disclosure to those groups outside the FCC for whom the information was not initially intended. Such disclosures, which are referred to as "Routine Uses," 2 are those instances that permit the FCC to
• http://www.fcc.gov/omd/privacyact/System_of_records/pia-faca.pdf
  • If the use of this information is both relevant and necessary to the processes for this information system is designed, please skip to Question 1.21. 1.20 If not, why or for what reasons is the information being collected? 1.21 Is the information covered under a Security Classification as determined by the FCC Security Officer? Yes No Please explain your response: 1.22 What is the legal authority that authorizes the development of the information system and the information/data collection? 1.23 In what instances would the information system's administrator/manager/developer permit disclosure to those groups outside the FCC for whom the information was not initially intended. Such disclosures, which are referred to as "Routine Uses," 2 are those instances that permit the FCC to
• http://www.fcc.gov/omd/privacyact/System_of_records/pia-financial.pdf
  • your response: This SORN will be used for payments, reimbursement, debts owed, and other miscellaneous debts owed. If yes, please skip to Question 1.21. 1.20 If not, why or for what reasons is the information being collected? 1.21 Is the information covered under a Security Classification as determined by the FCC Security Officer? Yes No Please explain your response: 10 1.22 What is the legal authority that authorizes the development of the information system and the information/data collection? 5 U.S.C. Chapter 57; 31 U.S.C. 3302(e); 44 U.S.C. 3101, 3102, and 3309; the Debt Collection Act as amended by the Debt Collection Improvement Act of 1996; Section 639 of the Consolidated Appropriations Act of 2005 (P.L. 108-447) 31 U.S.C. 3302(e); Federal Financial
• http://www.fcc.gov/omd/privacyact/System_of_records/pia-foia.pdf
  • is no "extraneous" information included in the database(s) or paper files? Yes No Please explain your response: If yes, please skip to Question 1.21. 1.20 If not, why or for what reasons is the information being collected? 1.21 Is the information covered under a Security Classification as determined by the FCC Security Officer? Yes No Please explain your response: 11 1.22 What is the legal authority that authorizes the development of the information system and the information/data collection? 1.23 In what instances would the information system's administrator/manager/developer permit disclosure to those groups outside the FCC for whom the information was not initially intended. Such disclosures, which are referred to as "Routine Uses," are those instances that permit the FCC to disclose
• http://www.fcc.gov/omd/privacyact/System_of_records/pia-general-investigative-files.pdf
  • the use of this information is both relevant and necessary to the processes for this information system is designed, please skip to Question 1.21. 1.20 If not, why or for what reasons is the information being collected? 1.21 Is the information covered under a Security Classification as determined by the FCC Security Officer? Yes No Please explain your response: 12 1.22 What is the legal authority that authorizes the development of the information system and the information/data collection? 1.23 In what instances would the information system's administrator/manager/developer permit disclosure to those groups outside the FCC for whom the information was not initially intended. Such disclosures, which are referred to as "Routine Uses,"2 are those instances that permit the FCC to disclose
• http://www.fcc.gov/omd/privacyact/System_of_records/pia-ils.pdf
  • If the use of this information is both relevant and necessary to the processes for this information system is designed, please skip to Question 1.21. 1.20 If not, why or for what reasons is the information being collected? 1.21 Is the information covered under a Security Classification as determined by the FCC Security Officer? Yes No Please explain your response: 1.22 What is the legal authority that authorizes the development of the information system and the information/data collection? 1.23 In what instances would the information system's administrator/manager/developer permit disclosure to those groups outside the FCC for whom the information was not initially intended. Such disclosures, which are referred to as "Routine Uses," 2 are those instances that permit the FCC to
• http://www.fcc.gov/omd/privacyact/System_of_records/pia-investigations-hearings.pdf
  • If the use of this information is both relevant and necessary to the processes for this information system is designed, please skip to Question 1.21. 1.20 If not, why or for what reasons is the information being collected? 1.21 Is the information covered under a Security Classification as determined by the FCC Security Officer? Yes No Please explain your response: 1.22 What is the legal authority that authorizes the development of the information system and the information/data collection? 1.23 In what instances would the information system's administrator/manager/developer permit disclosure to those groups outside the FCC for whom the information was not initially intended. Such disclosures, which are referred to as "Routine Uses," 2 are those instances that permit the FCC to
• http://www.fcc.gov/omd/privacyact/System_of_records/pia-labor-employee-relations.pdf
  • If the use of this information is both relevant and necessary to the processes for this information system is designed, please skip to Question 1.21. 1.20 If not, why or for what reasons is the information being collected? 1.21 Is the information covered under a Security Classification as determined by the FCC Security Officer? Yes No Please explain your response: 1.22 What is the legal authority that authorizes the development of the information system and the information/data collection? 1.23 In what instances would the information system's administrator/manager/developer permit disclosure to those groups outside the FCC for whom the information was not initially intended. Such disclosures, which are referred to as "Routine Uses," 2 are those instances that permit the FCC to
• http://www.fcc.gov/omd/privacyact/System_of_records/pia-lmts.pdf
  • the information covered under a Security Classification as determined by the FCC Security Officer? Yes No Please explain your response: The FCC's Security Operations Center (SOC) has not assigned a security classification to the Legislative Management Tracking System (LMTS) and to the PII that it collects, uses, and maintains, which is covered by FCC/OLA-1, "Legislative Management Tracking System (LMTS)" SORN. 1.22 What are the categories of individuals covered by the system of records notice (SORN)? The categories of individuals include members of the U.S. House of Representatives and the Senate, members of the public-at-large, and FCC employees. 1.23 What are the categories of records, e.g., types of information (or records) that the system of records notice (SORN) collects, maintains, and uses?
• http://www.fcc.gov/omd/privacyact/System_of_records/pia-pams.pdf
  • Classification as determined by the FCC Security Officer? Yes No Please explain your response: The FCC Security Operations Center (SOC) has not assigned a security classification to the Personnel Availability Management System (PAMS) information system, and to the personally identifiable information (PII) that it collects, uses, and maintains, that is covered by FCC/OMD- 26, "Personnel Availability Management System (PAMS)" SORN. 1.22 What are categories of individuals covered by the system of records notice (SORN)? The categories of individuals that are covered by FCC/OMD-26, "Personnel Availability Management System (PAMS)" SORN include FCC employees and contractors. 1.23 What are the categories of records, e.g., types of information (or records) that the system of records notice (SORN) collects, maintains, and uses? The categories of
• http://www.fcc.gov/omd/privacyact/System_of_records/pia-pay-leave-garnish.pdf
  • the use of this information is both relevant and necessary to the processes for this information system is designed, please skip to Question 1.21. 1.20 If not, why or for what reasons is the information being collected? 1.21 Is the information covered under a Security Classification as determined by the FCC Security Officer? Yes No Please explain your response: 12 1.22 What is the legal authority that authorizes the development of the information system and the information/data collection? 1.23 In what instances would the information system's administrator/manager/developer permit disclosure to those groups outside the FCC for whom the information was not initially intended. Such disclosures, which are referred to as "Routine Uses," 2 are those instances that permit the FCC to
• http://www.fcc.gov/omd/privacyact/System_of_records/pia-personal-security-files.pdf
  • the use of this information is both relevant and necessary to the processes for this information system is designed, please skip to Question 1.21. 1.20 If not, why or for what reasons is the information being collected? 12 1.21 Is the information covered under a Security Classification as determined by the FCC Security Officer? Yes No Please explain your response: 1.22 What is the legal authority that authorizes the development of the information system and the information/data collection? 1.23 In what instances would the information system's administrator/manager/developer permit disclosure to those groups outside the FCC for whom the information was not initially intended. Such disclosures, which are referred to as "Routine Uses,"2 are those instances that permit the FCC to disclose
• http://www.fcc.gov/omd/privacyact/System_of_records/pia-physical-access.pdf
  • the use of this information is both relevant and necessary to the processes for which this information system is designed, please skip to Question 1.21. 1.20 If not, why or for what reasons is the information being collected? 1.21 Is the information covered under a Security Classification as determined by the FCC Security Officer? Yes No Please explain your response: 1.22 What is the legal authority that authorizes the development of the information system and the information/data collection? 1.23 In what instances would the information system's administrator/manager/developer permit disclosure to those groups outside the FCC for whom the information was not initially intended. Such disclosures, which are referred to as "Routine Uses," are those instances that permit the FCC to disclose
• http://www.fcc.gov/omd/privacyact/System_of_records/pia-reasonable-accommodation-requests.pdf
  • If the use of this information is both relevant and necessary to the processes for this information system is designed, please skip to Question 1.21. 1.20 If not, why or for what reasons is the information being collected? 1.21 Is the information covered under a Security Classification as determined by the FCC Security Officer? Yes No Please explain your response: 1.22 What is the legal authority that authorizes the development of the information system and the information/data collection? 1.23 In what instances would the information system's administrator/manager/developer permit disclosure to those groups outside the FCC for whom the information was not initially intended. Such disclosures, which are referred to as "Routine Uses," 2 are those instances that permit the FCC to
• http://www.fcc.gov/omd/privacyact/System_of_records/pia-remedy.pdf
  • If the use of this information is both relevant and necessary to the processes for this information system is designed, please skip to Question 1.21. 1.20 If not, why or for what reasons is the information being collected? 1.21 Is the information covered under a Security Classification as determined by the FCC Security Officer? Yes No Please explain your response: 1.22 What is the legal authority that authorizes the development of the information system and the information/data collection? 1.23 In what instances would the information system's administrator/manager/developer permit disclosure to those groups outside the FCC for whom the information was not initially intended. 11 Such disclosures, which are referred to as "Routine Uses,"2 are those instances that permit the FCC to
• http://www.fcc.gov/omd/privacyact/System_of_records/pia-rmis.pdf
  • designed, please skip to Question 1.21. 1.20 If not, why or for what reasons is the information being collected? 11 1.21 Is the information covered under a Security Classification as determined by the FCC Security Officer? Yes No Please explain your response: The Security Operations Center has determined that the new RMIS information system does not require a security classification. 1.22 What is the legal authority that authorizes the development of the information system and the information/data collection? Budget and Accounting Act of 1921; Budget and Accounting Procedures Act of 1950; Federal Communications Authorization Act of 1989, and 31 U.S.C. 525. 1.23 In what instances would the information system's administrator/manager/developer permit disclosure to those groups outside the FCC for whom the
• http://www.fcc.gov/omd/privacyact/System_of_records/pia-small-business-contacts.pdf
  • If the use of this information is both relevant and necessary to the processes for this information system is designed, please skip to Question 1.21. 1.20 If not, why or for what reasons is the information being collected? 1.21 Is the information covered under a Security Classification as determined by the FCC Security Officer? Yes No Please explain your response: 1.22 What is the legal authority that authorizes the development of the information system and the information/data collection? 1.23 In what instances would the information system's administrator/manager/developer permit disclosure to those groups outside the FCC for whom the information was not initially intended. Such disclosures, which are referred to as "Routine Uses," 2 are those instances that permit the FCC to
• http://www.fcc.gov/omd/privacyact/System_of_records/pia-telephone-call-details.pdf
  • If the use of this information is both relevant and necessary to the processes for this information system is designed, please skip to Question 1.21. 1.20 If not, why or for what reasons is the information being collected? 1.21 Is the information covered under a Security Classification as determined by the FCC Security Officer? Yes No Please explain your response: 1.22 What is the location of the information covered by the system of records notice (SORN)? Yes No Please explain your response: 1.23 What are the categories of individuals covered by the system of records notice (SORN)? Yes No Please explain your response: 1.24 What are the categories of records, e.g., types of information (or records) that the system of records
• http://www.fcc.gov/omd/privacyact/System_of_records/pia-transit.pdf
  • there is no "extraneous" information included in the database(s) or paper files? Yes No Please explain your response: If yes, please skip to Question 1.21. 1.20 If not, why or for what reasons is the information being collected? 1.21 Is the information covered under a Security Classification as determined by the FCC Security Officer? Yes No Please explain your response: 1.22 What is the legal authority that authorizes the development of the information system and the information/data collection? 1.23 In what instances would the information system's administrator/manager/developer permit disclosure to those groups outside the FCC for whom the information was not initially intended. Such disclosures, which are referred to as "Routine Uses," are those instances that permit the FCC to disclose
• http://www.fcc.gov/omd/privacyact/System_of_records/pia-uls.pdf
  • the use of this information is both relevant and necessary to the processes for this information system is designed, please skip to Question 1.21. 1.20 If not, why or for what reasons is the information being collected? 13 1.21 Is the information covered under a Security Classification as determined by the FCC Security Officer? Yes No Please explain your response: 1.22 What is the legal authority that authorizes the development of the information system and the information/data collection? 1.23 In what instances would the information system's administrator/manager/developer permit disclosure to those groups outside the FCC for whom the information was not initially intended. Such disclosures, which are referred to as "Routine Uses," are those instances that permit the FCC to disclose
• http://www.fcc.gov/omd/privacyact/System_of_records/pia-violators.pdf
  • If the use of this information is both relevant and necessary to the processes for this information system is designed, please skip to Question 1.21. 1.20 If not, why or for what reasons is the information being collected? 1.21 Is the information covered under a Security Classification as determined by the FCC Security Officer? Yes No Please explain your response: 1.22 What is the location of the information covered by the system of records notice (SORN)? Yes No Please explain your response: 12 1.23 What are the categories of individuals covered by the system of records notice (SORN)? Yes No Please explain your response: 1.24 What are the categories of records, e.g., types of information (or records) that the system of
• http://www.fcc.gov/omd/privacyact/System_of_records/pshsb-coop-plan.pdf
  • If the use of this information is both relevant and necessary to the processes for this information system is designed, please skip to Question 1.21. 1.20 If not, why or for what reasons is the information being collected? 1.21 Is the information covered under a Security Classification as determined by the FCC Security Officer? Yes No Please explain your response: 1.22 What is the legal authority that authorizes the development of the information system and the information/data collection? 1.23 In what instances would the information system's administrator/manager/developer permit disclosure to those groups outside the FCC for whom the information was not initially intended. Such disclosures, which are referred to as "Routine Uses,"2 are those instances that permit the FCC to disclose
• http://www.fcc.gov/ownership/materials/already-released/consumer090002.pdf
  • BB/EZ 7 0.13 B/T 6 0.1 BB/FS 5 0.09 BB 315 4.99 BB/O 1 0.02 BB/EZ 3 0.05 Country (C) 772 14.1 BB/REL 1 0.02 C/FS 20 0.37 BB/T 1 0.02 CHR 488 8.91 C 904 14.32 CHR/AC 15 0.27 C/FS 14 0.22 CHR/Spanish (SP) 3 0.05 CHR 410 6.49 CHR/Urban (U) 9 0.16 CHR/AC 51 0.81 Classical (CL) 67 1.22 CHR/NR 9 0.14 Classic AOR(CL AOR) 151 2.76 CHR/U 56 0.89 Ethnic (E) 16 0.29 CL 70 1.11 Easy Listening (EZ) 2 0.04 CL AOR 284 4.5 EZ/New Age Contemp. (NAC) 1 0.02 CL HITS 83 1.31 EZ/SAC 3 0.05 E 14 0.22 FS 202 3.69 EZ 13 0.21 FS/T 41 0.75 EZ/SAC 1 0.02 G 55 1 FS 96
• http://www.fcc.gov/ownership/roundtable_docs/waldfogel-a.pdf
  • Who Benefits Whom among Blacks and Whites? Five-Digit Zips Hybrid Zips (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) MSA White Pop ( 1) 0.0086 0.0085 0.0116 0.0085 0.0136 0.0095 0.0059 0.0093 (5.68)** (5.06)** (2.57)* (4.91)** (3.63)** (2.44)* (3.30)** (2.26)* MSA Black Pop ( 2) 0.0025 -0.0004 0.0156 -0.0005 0.0133 0.0264 0.0106 0.0259 (0.32) (0.05) (0.74) (0.06) (0.71) (1.32) (1.18) (1.22) Zip Black Fr. -0.1367 -0.1120 -0.0931 -0.1990 -0.1556 -0.0942 -0.1068 -0.1014 (19.45)** (15.44)** (5.91)** (6.16)** (9.82)** (6.00)** (15.11)** (0.91) Zip Black Fr.* White Pop ( 1- 1) -0.0426 -0.0419 -0.0712 -0.0397 -0.0687 -0.0726 -0.0397 -0.0665 (6.11)** (5.95)** (3.58)** (4.54)** (3.17)** (3.44)** (5.81)** (2.34)* Zip Black Fr.* Black Pop ( 2- 2) 0.1505 0.1221 0.1724 0.1172 0.2258 0.1791 0.1075 0.1755 (4.99)**
• http://www.fcc.gov/ownership/summary_data_female_ownership_2004-2005.pdf
  • = Votes Perc Gender:Ethnicity: Race: Ownership Structure: Name and Address: SHERIDAN BROADCASTING CORPORATION; 960 PENN AVENUE, SUITE 200; PITTSBURGH, PENNSYLVANIA 15222 96.34 Not Hisp. or Latino M Black or Afr. Amer. RONALD R. DAVENPORT, SR.; 5837 SOLWAY STREET; PITTSBURGH, PENNSYLVANIA 15217 96.34 Not Hisp. or Latino F Black or Afr. Amer. JUDITH M. DAVENPORT; 5837 SOLWAY STREET; PITTSBURGH, PENNSYLVANIA 15217 1.22 Not Hisp. or Latino M Black or Afr. Amer. RONALD R. DAVENPORT, JR.; 715 AMBERSON AVENUE; PITTSBURGH, PENNSYLVANIA 15232 1.22 Not Hisp. or Latino F Black or Afr. Amer. JUDITH ALLISON DAVENPORT SIMMONS; 5523 VENTURA CANYON DRIVE; SHERMAN OAKS, CALIFORNIA 91401 1.22 Not Hisp. or Latino F Black or Afr. Amer. SUSAN DAVENPORT AUSTIN; 1165 PARK AVENUE, APARTMENT 8D; NEW
• http://www.fcc.gov/ownership/summary_data_female_ownership_2006-2007.pdf
  • Perc Gender:Ethnicity: Race: Ownership Structure: Name and Address: 0 X SHERIDAN BROADCASTING CORPORATION; 960 PENN AVENUE, SUITE 200; PITTSBURGH, PENNSYLVANIA 15222 96.34 Not Hisp. or Latino M Black or Afr. Amer. RONALD R. DAVENPORT, SR.; 5837 SOLWAY STREET; PITTSBURGH, PENNSYLVANIA 15217 96.34 Not Hisp. or Latino F Black or Afr. Amer. JUDITH M. DAVENPORT; 5837 SOLWAY STREET; PITTSBURGH, PENNSYLVANIA 15217 1.22 Not Hisp. or Latino M Black or Afr. Amer. RONALD R. DAVENPORT, JR.; 715 AMBERSON AVENUE; PITTSBURGH, PENNSYLVANIA 15232 1.22 Not Hisp. or Latino F Black or Afr. Amer. JUDITH ALLISON DAVENPORT SIMMONS; 5523 VENTURA CANYON DRIVE; SHERMAN OAKS, CALIFORNIA 91401 1.22 Not Hisp. or Latino F Black or Afr. Amer. SUSAN DAVENPORT AUSTIN; 1165 PARK AVENUE, APARTMENT 8D; NEW
• http://www.fcc.gov/ownership/summary_data_minority_ownership_2004-2005.pdf
  • Votes Perc Ethnicity: Race: Ownership Structure: Name and Address: Gender: SHERIDAN BROADCASTING CORPORATION; 960 PENN AVENUE, SUITE 200; PITTSBURGH, PENNSYLVANIA 15222 96.34 Not Hisp. or Latino Black or Afr. Amer. RONALD R. DAVENPORT, SR.; 5837 SOLWAY STREET; PITTSBURGH, PENNSYLVANIA 15217 M 96.34 Not Hisp. or Latino Black or Afr. Amer. JUDITH M. DAVENPORT; 5837 SOLWAY STREET; PITTSBURGH, PENNSYLVANIA 15217 F 1.22 Not Hisp. or Latino Black or Afr. Amer. RONALD R. DAVENPORT, JR.; 715 AMBERSON AVENUE; PITTSBURGH, PENNSYLVANIA 15232 M 1.22 Not Hisp. or Latino Black or Afr. Amer. JUDITH ALLISON DAVENPORT SIMMONS; 5523 VENTURA CANYON DRIVE; SHERMAN OAKS, CALIFORNIA 91401 F 1.22 Not Hisp. or Latino Black or Afr. Amer. SUSAN DAVENPORT AUSTIN; 1165 PARK AVENUE, APARTMENT 8D; NEW YORK,
• http://www.fcc.gov/ownership/summary_data_minority_ownership_2006-2007.pdf
  • Ethnicity: Race: Ownership Structure: Name and Address: Gender: 0 SHERIDAN BROADCASTING CORPORATION; 960 PENN AVENUE, SUITE 200; PITTSBURGH, PENNSYLVANIA 15222 X 96.34 Not Hisp. or Latino Black or Afr. Amer. RONALD R. DAVENPORT, SR.; 5837 SOLWAY STREET; PITTSBURGH, PENNSYLVANIA 15217 M 96.34 Not Hisp. or Latino Black or Afr. Amer. JUDITH M. DAVENPORT; 5837 SOLWAY STREET; PITTSBURGH, PENNSYLVANIA 15217 F 1.22 Not Hisp. or Latino Black or Afr. Amer. RONALD R. DAVENPORT, JR.; 715 AMBERSON AVENUE; PITTSBURGH, PENNSYLVANIA 15232 M 1.22 Not Hisp. or Latino Black or Afr. Amer. JUDITH ALLISON DAVENPORT SIMMONS; 5523 VENTURA CANYON DRIVE; SHERMAN OAKS, CALIFORNIA 91401 F 1.22 Not Hisp. or Latino Black or Afr. Amer. SUSAN DAVENPORT AUSTIN; 1165 PARK AVENUE, APARTMENT 8D; NEW YORK,
• http://www.fcc.gov/transaction/comsat-telenor/fcc01-369.pdf
  • law enforcement agency or a U.S. intelligence agency as Sensitive Information. 1.21 "Subscriber Information" means information of the type referred to and accessible subject to procedures specified in 18 U.S.C. § 2703(c) or (d) or 18 U.S.C. § 2709. Such information shall also be considered Subscriber Information when it is sought pursuant to the provisions of other Lawful U.S. Process. 1.22 "Telenor" has the meaning given to it in the Preamble. It includes all successors and assigns of Telenor. 1.23 "Telenor Broadband Services AS" or "TBS" has the meaning given to it in the Preamble, and also encompasses its directly or indirectly wholly-owned Norway-incorporated subsidiaries, Telenor Satellite Mobile Ventures AS and Telenor Satellite Mobile AS, including all of their successors, assigns