FCC Web Documents citing 1.19

as compiled by hallikainen.com/FccRules on 2012 07 01

• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-90A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-90A1.pdf
  • Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture, 15 Rcd 16999 (2000); US Notary, Inc., Forfeiture Order, 16 FCC Rcd 18398 (2001); Tri-Star Marketing, Inc., Notice of Apparent Liability For Forfeiture, 15 FCC Rcd 11295 (2000); Tri-Star Marketing, Inc., Forfeiture Order, 15 FCC Rcd 23198 (2000). See 47 U.S.C. § 503(b)(4)(C); 47 C.F.R. § 1.80(f)(3). 47 C.F.R. § 1.80. 47 C.F.R. § 1.19. (...continued from previous page) (continued....) Federal Communications Commission FCC 08-90 Federal Communications Commission FCC 08-90 F F F F F  ' Ç Ç *0 Ç *0 „¶ ¶ ^„¶ „ ^„
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-87A7.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-87A7.txt
  • Not Available 0.30 Barbados 34.53 36.99 40.43 42.40 Belgium 45.75 46.52 46.81 50.02 Belize 13.40 13.33 13.69 13.75 Bolivia 4.68 4.32 6.88 6.88 Brazil 8.51 9.57 10.66 12.05 Brunei Darussalam 23.99 26.26 Not Available 24.68 Bulgaria 30.57 31.26 32.26 32.89 Canada 59.98 60.24 60.95 63.39 Chile 13.20 15.59 17.98 20.55 Colombia 9.98 11.76 14.75 15.35 Cote d'Ivoire 0.81 0.88 0.93 1.19 Cyprus 53.83 55.48 56.97 58.51 Czech Republic 23.65 27.31 31.84 36.39 Denmark 60.82 61.79 63.33 65.97 Dominica 24.13 26.39 Not Available 25.23 Dominican Republic 7.37 8.26 Not Available 9.28 Ecuador 6.52 7.33 7.53 7.83 El Salvador 5.28 5.61 Not Available 8.00 Estonia 27.74 29.87 32.10 34.29 Finland 55.01 54.90 55.59 55.39 France 55.80 56.36 57.50 56.97 Germany 49.35 53.84 54.98
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1092A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1092A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1092A1.txt
  • 7D. The U.S. supports the broadening of the secondary MSS allocation at 14-14.5 GHz to include AMSS, provided that the ITU-R studies indicate that this service can operate without causing harmful interference to the primary services in the band and that the service will be compatible with existing secondary uses. (04.11.01) IWG-3 DRAFT PRELIMINARY VIEWS ON WRC-03 WRC-2003 Agenda Item 1.19: to consider regulatory provisions to avoid misapplication of the non-GSO FSS single-entry limits in Article S22 based on the results of ITU-R studies carried out in accordance with Resolution 135 (WRC-2000); ISSUE: Avoiding misapplication of non-GSO FSS single-entry limits (e.g., through artificially splitting or combining of non-GSO FSS systems). BACKGROUND: WRC-2000 established single-entry equivalent power flux density (epfd) limits for
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2764A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2764A1.txt
  • of WRC-01a future competent WRC, Reasons: The dates in the resolution are obsolete. By changing the date to a future competent WRC leaves the option for instructing the ITU-R to study the sharing of the band between MSS feeder links and ARNS at an appropriate time. United States of America PROPOSALS FOR THE WORK OF THE CONFERENCE 1 Agenda Item 1.19: to consider regulatory provisions to avoid misapplication of the non-GSO FSS single-entry limits in Article S22 based on the results of ITU-R studies carried out in accordance with Resolution 135 (WRC-2000); Background Information: WRC-2000 adopted, in Article S22, a combination of single-entry validation, operational and, for 3 and 10 meter antennas in the 10.7-12.75 GHz band, single- entry additional operational
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2512A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2512A2.txt
  • judicial or arbitral body. VA01 /GRIFJ/20093.12 1.18 "Hosting Services" means Web hosting (whether shared or dedicated, and including design, server management, maintenance and telecommunications services), Web site traffic management, electronic commerce, streamed media services, server collocation and management, application hosting, and all other similar services offered by X0 or any of its subsidiaries, affiliates, divisions, departments, branches or other components. 1.19 "Intercept" or "Intercepted" has the meaning defined in 18 U.S.C. 9 25 lO(4). 1.20 "Lawful U.S. Process" means lawful U.S. federal, state or local Electronic Surveillance or other court orders, processes, or authorizations issued under U.S. federal, state, or local law for physical search or seizure, production of tangible things, or access to or disclosure of Domestic Communications, Call Associated
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3121A3.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3121A3.txt
  • 1.16. means n0rrU.S. `Toreign" where used in this Agreement, whether capitalized or lower case, 1.17. "GCL" - means Global Crossing Ltd., a Bermuda corporation. Page 6 1.18. "Governmental Authoritv` ' or "Governmental Authorities" means any government, or any governmental, administrative, or regulatory entity, authority, commission, board, agency, instrumentality, bureau, or political subdivision, and any court, tribunal, judicial, or arbitral body. 1.19. `9nterceDt" or ``Intercepted" has the meaning defined in 18 U.S.C. 2510(4). 1.20. "LawfUl U.S. Process" means lawful U.S. Federal, state, or local Electronic Surveillance or other court orders, processes, or authorizations issued under U.S. Federal, state, or local law for physical search or seizure, production of tangible things, or access to or disclosure of Domestic Communications or Call Associated Data,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1698A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1698A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1698A1.txt
  • than 18,000 km and orbital perigee altitudes that are less than the orbital apogee altitudes. Consequently, there is no need to review the limits that apply to those non-GSO satellite systems using circular orbits, such as medium earth orbits (MEO), that satisfy both the apogee altitude criterion and the inclination criterion. UNITED STATES DRAFT PRELIMINARY VIEWS ON WRC-07 Agenda Item 1.19: to consider the results of the ITU-R studies regarding spectrum requirement for global broadband satellite systems in order to identify possible global harmonized FSS frequency bands for the use of Internet applications, and consider the appropriate regulatory/technical provisions, taking also into account No. 5.516B of the Radio Regulations; ISSUE: The purpose of this agenda item is to investigate fixed-satellite service
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1698A1_Erratum.doc
  • than 18,000 km and orbital perigee altitudes that are less than the orbital apogee altitudes. Consequently, there is no need to review the limits that apply to those non-GSO satellite systems using circular orbits, such as medium earth orbits (MEO), that satisfy both the apogee altitude criterion and the inclination criterion. UNITED STATES DRAFT PRELIMINARY VIEWS ON WRC-07 Agenda Item 1.19: to consider the results of the ITU-R studies regarding spectrum requirement for global broadband satellite systems in order to identify possible global harmonized FSS frequency bands for the use of Internet applications, and consider the appropriate regulatory/technical provisions, taking also into account No. 5.516B of the Radio Regulations; ISSUE: The purpose of this agenda item is to investigate fixed-satellite service
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2668A2.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2668A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2668A2.txt
  • meaning defined in 18 U.S.C. § 2510(4). 1.18 ``Lawful U.S. Process'' means lawful U.S. federal, state or local Electronic Surveillance or other court orders, processes, or authorizations issued under U.S. federal, state, or local law for physical search or seizure, production of tangible things, or access to or disclosure of Domestic Communications, Call Associated Data, Transactional Data or Subscriber Information. 1.19 ``Network Management Information'' means network management operations plans, processes and procedures; descriptions of the placement of Network Operating Center(s) and linkages (for service offload or administrative activities) to other domestic and international carriers, ISPs and other critical infrastructures; descriptions of networks and operations processes and procedures for management control and relation to the backbone infrastructure(s) including other service providers; description
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2481A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2481A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2481A1.txt
  • 9.22, in respect of a space station. Frequency bands for which a footnote refers to No. 9.22 Bandwidth overlap Check using assigned frequencies and bandwidths Reasons: Consequential to the addition of No. 9.22 (see USA/1.8/3 above), Table 5-1 needs to be updated to take No. 9.22 into account. Document WAC/066(14.09.05): DRAFT PROPOSAL FOR THE WORK OF THE CONFERENCE Agenda Item 1.19: to consider the results of ITU-R studies regarding spectrum requirements for global broadband satellite systems in order to identify possible global harmonized FSS frequency bands for the use of internet applications, and consider the appropriate regulatory provisions, taking also into account No. 5.516B of the Radio Regulations. Background Information: WRC-03 adopted this agenda item which relates to the identification of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-115A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-115A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-115A1.txt
  • On April 23, 2004, Francis requested reconsideration of the dismissal. Francis notes that while the location of his proposed base station is more than 80 kilometers from the geographic center of San Francisco, it is less than 50 miles (specifically, 49.875 miles). He argues that the application therefore complied with Section 90.305. We disagree. This matter is governed by Section 1.19 of the Commission's Rules, which states, ``where parenthesized English units accompany metric units throughout this chapter, and the two figures are not precisely equivalent, the metric unit shall be considered the sole requirement.'' Because the application did not meet the 80-kilometer requirement, the Division properly dismissed it. We therefore deny Francis's petition for reconsideration. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1564A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1564A2.txt
  • use of locally-unused spectrum within the TV broadcast spectrum, which is also often termed "white-space" use; non-TV use of spectrum adjacent to or near TV broadcast spectrum (e.g., the TV channel 52 to 67 spectrum that will be auctioned for other uses); and, other DTV stations. * Charles W. Rhodes, "The Challenge of Channel Election, TV Technology.com, January 19, 2005. (http://www.tvtechnology.com/features/digital_tv/Features_Rhodes-01.19.05.shtml) Oded Bendov and others, "Planning Factors for Fixed and Portable DTTV Reception", IEEE Transactions On Broadcasting, Vol. 50, No. 3, September 2004. Martin, , 2005, chapter 3. § Federal Communications Commission Advisory Committee on Advanced Television Service, "Final Technical Report", Oct 31, 1995, p.19. 1- 3 The results also enable evaluation of the degree to which consumer DTV receivers
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1564A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1564A2.txt
  • 7-4. D/U Ratio With 8-VSB as Undesired Signal Relative to That with Bandlimited Gaussian Noise D/U Ratio Relative to Baseline (dB) Channel Offset A3 D3 I1 J1 M1 N1 O1 G4 Mean (dB) (Excluding G4) Standard Deviation (dB) (Excluding G4) N-6 -1.32 -1.25 -1.61 -0.73 -1.85 -0.87 -1.76 -3.72 -1.34 0.43 N-4 -1.31 -1.43 -0.92 -1.07 -1.66 -1.07 -0.87 -1.94 -1.19 0.29 N-3 -0.79 -1.85 -2.23 -1.73 -1.50 -2.38 -1.47 -0.26 -1.71 0.53 N-2 -0.76 -1.94 -2.31 -0.53 -1.31 -0.91 -0.71 -0.89 -1.21 0.68 N+2 0.02 -2.99 -1.94 -0.48 -0.04 -0.67 -0.40 0.50 -0.93 1.12 Mean -0.83 -1.89 -1.80 -0.91 -1.27 -1.18 -1.04 -1.26 -1.28 Std Dev 0.55 0.68 0.56 0.51 0.72 0.69 0.56 1.64 0.68 Note: The overall means and
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3470A4.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3470A4.txt
  • 0.47 0.47 0.47 0.47 Notes:Reportedaretheresultsof9regressionsoftheaverageminutesoftelevisionadvertisingonvarious measuresoftelevisionstationownershipstructureandcontrolvariables.Section6.2describesthevarious specificationsinmoredetail.Standarderrorsinparentheses.Boldfaceindicatesstatisticalsignificanceat the5%level. 53 Table25: TheImpactofOwnershipStructureonAdvertisingPrices Priceisfor30-secondadvertisement. Specification (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) EstimateEstimateEstimateEstimateEstimateEstimateEstimateEstimateEstimate Variable Std.Err.Std.Err.Std.Err.Std.Err.Std.Err.Std.Err.Std.Err.Std.Err.Std.Err. DMAInformation DMAHouseholds 1.040 - - - - - - - - -(0.04) DMAHHSquared -0.039 - - - - - - - - -(0.01) CommercialStation - - - - - - - - - AffiliateInformation ABC 1.19 1.27 1.26 1.28 1.27 1.28 1.20 1.28 1.22 -(0.07) -(0.07) -(0.07) -(0.07) -(0.07) -(0.07) -(0.07) -(0.07) -(0.07) CBS 1.18 1.27 1.26 1.27 1.27 1.27 1.16 1.27 1.18 -(0.07) -(0.07) -(0.07) -(0.07) -(0.07) -(0.07) -(0.07) -(0.07) -(0.07) NBC 1.14 1.22 1.21 1.22 1.22 1.23 1.19 1.22 1.22 -(0.07) -(0.07) -(0.07) -(0.07) -(0.07) -(0.07) -(0.07) -(0.07) -(0.07) FOX 0.82 0.88 0.88 0.88
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3470A6.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3470A6.txt
  • (-1.29) -0.000015* (-2.73) 0.706 251 Format 20 Count -0.133 (0.08) 0.281* (10.74) 1.9880 (0.36) 0.355 (0.40) 0.000307 (1.53) 0.687 251 Format 20 HHI -0.110* (2.00) -0.007* (8.09) -0.1562 (-0.81) -0.008 (-0.28) -0.000005 (-0.64) 0.592 251 Format 11 Count -0.926 (0.68) 0.202* (8.99) -1.6748 (-0.35) 0.742 (0.99) 0.000269 (1.56) 0.629 251 Format 11 HHI -0.028 (0.49) -0.006* (6.32) 0.0083 (0.04) -0.039 (-1.19) -0.000006 (-0.82) 0.537 251 With Demographics: Format 101 Count 1.603 (0.81) 0.512* (15.16) -3.8074 (-0.55) 0.751 (0.68) 0.000276 (1.02) 0.865 244 Format 101 HHI -0.105* (2.43) -0.006* (8.14) 0.1564 (1.03) -0.034 (-1.40) -0.000003 (-0.57) 0.742 244 Format 20 Count 0.038 (0.02) 0.237* (8.95) -1.0067 (-0.19) 0.181 (0.21) -0.000123 (-0.58) 0.725 244 Format 20 HHI -0.117* (2.14) -0.006* (6.56) -0.0650 (-0.34)
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3470A7.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3470A7.txt
  • (3) (4) (5) Local station ownership Cross-owned newspaper -3.0 (1.14) -4.4 (1.16) -5.8 (1.28) -5.2 (1.24) -5.4 (1.29) Cross-owned radio station 1.2 (0.32) 1.8 (0.49) 4.1 (1.13) 2.4 (0.59) Cross-owned radio and newspaper 2.9 (0.55) 3.5 (0.61) 2.3 (0.40) 5.1 (0.80) Parent company coverage of all television households (%) 0.2 (0.84) 0.1 (0.38) 0.3 (1.23) Network owned and operated -6.2 (1.19) -6.9 (1.25) -10.5* (1.77) Network affiliation (omitted category is CW\MyNetwork) ABC -2.1 (0.61) -4.5 (0.83) CBS -0.7 (0.21) -4.2 (0.68) FOX 5.8 (1.63) 9.2** (2.33) NBC -1.0 (0.30) -4.3 (0.70) Other control variables Time and length of broadcast fixed effects No No No No Yes DMA and date fixed effects Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Adjusted R-squared .02 .01 .01
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1994A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1994A2.txt
  • 585-610 5.297 FIXED 608-614 MOBILE RADIOASTRONOMY BROADCASTING Mobile-satelliteexcept RADIONAVIGATION aeronauticalmobile-satellite 5.1495.3055.3065.307 (Earth-to-space) 610-890 614-698 FIXED BROADCASTING MOBILE5.313A5.317A Fixed BROADCASTING Mobile 5.2935.3095.311A 698-806 BROADCASTING Fixed 5.1495.291A5.2945.2965.300 MOBILE5.313B5.317A 5.3025.3045.3065.311A5.312 790-862 5.2935.3095.311A FIXED 806-890 BROADCASTING FIXED MOBILEexceptaeronautical MOBILE5.317A mobile5.316B5.317A BROADCASTING 5.3125.3145.3155.316 5.316A5.319 862-890 FIXED MOBILEexceptaeronautical mobile5.317A BROADCASTING5.322 5.1495.3055.3065.307 5.3195.323 5.3175.318 5.311A5.320 Reasons:WRC-12AgendaItem1.17islimitedtoterrestrialservicesonlyinRegionsIand3 andonlyintheband790-862MHz.TherearenobasesforanychangesintheRadioRegulations thatwouldimpacttheterrestrialservicesintheband790-862MHzinRegion2.Therefore,the 13 UnitedStatesproposesNOCwithrespecttoanychangetoArticle5thatcouldimpactRegion2 servicesintheband790-862MHz.Theworldwideintroductionofnewtelecommunications servicesinthemobileandfixedserviceallocationsinthisbandrequiresstableallocationsthatare harmonizedtothegreatestdegreepossible. 14 DOCUMENTWAC/051(Ol.09.09) UnitedStatesofAmerica DRAFTPROPOSALSFORTHEWORKOFTHECONFERENCE WRC·12AgendaItem1.19:toconsiderregulatorymeasuresandtheirrelevance,in ordertoenabletheintroductionofsoftware-definedradioandcognitiveradiosystems, basedontheresultsofITU-Rstudies,inaccordancewithResolution956(WRC·07). BACKGROUND:Resolution956(WRC-07)resolvestoinviteITU-Rtostudywhetherthereis aneedforregulatorymeasurestoenabletheintroductionofsoftware-definedradioandcognitive radiosystems. Softwaredefinedradios(SDR)andcognitiveradiosystems(CRS)aretechnologieswhichmay offerimprovedefficiencytotheoverallspectrumuseandprovideadditionalflexibilitiesto radiocommunicationservices.Theyarenotradiocommunicationservicesthemselves,butrather aretechnologiesthatmaybedeployedinradiocommunicationsystems. AnysystemthatincorporatesSDR,CRSorcombined SDRICRStechnologiesshalloperatein accordancewiththeprovisionsoftheRadioRegulationsandadministrationrulesgoverningthe useofthefrequencybandinwhichthesystemsareintendedtooperate.Todate,some administrationshaveallowedsuchsystemstooperateonalicence-exempt,non-harmful interferencebasis.IntheU.S.,theregulatorybodyhasprovidedthroughequipmentauthorization requirementsoperatingparametersfor SDRICRSdevicestoensurethatsuchdeviceswillnot causeharmfulinterferencetoallocatedradiocommunicationservices. RelevantITU-Rworkingpartiesareconductingtechnicalstudies,asnotedinResolution956 (WRC-07).TheUnitedStateswillparticipateasappropriateinthesestudies.TheUnitedStates doesnotbelievethatchangestotheRadioRegulationsareneededtoaddressthesetechnologies. Inparticular,theUnitedStatesdoesnotsupportregulatorymeasuresleadingtoallocations, includingidentificationfootnotes,forsoftware-definedradioandcognitiveradiosystems,as thesearetechnologies,eachwithitsownattributes,andnotradiocommunicationservices.With respecttothedefinitions,description,orcharacterizationofSDRorCRS,thereisnoneedto includeadefinitionofSDRorCRSintheRadioRegulations. PROPOSALS: NOC USA/AI1.19/1 ARTICLE1 Termsanddefinitions Reason:NochangestotheRadioRegulationsarenecessarytoenabletheintroductionofSDR andCRStechnologies.SDRandCRStechniquescanbeusedwitharangeoftechnologies,and inarangeoffrequencybandssubjecttoappropriateequipmentauthorizationproceduresto ensurethatauthorizeddevicesoperatewithinthelimitationsanadministrationappliestothe frequencybandsinwhichthesesystemsare permittedtooperate.Anydefinitionsdevelopedfor SDRandCRScouldbecapturedinanITU-RRecommendation. NOC USA/AI1.19/2 15 ARTICLE5 Frequencyallocations Reason:NochangestotheRadioRegulationsarenecessarytoenabletheintroductionofSDR andCRStechnologies.-SDRandCRStechniquescanbeusedwitharangeoftechnologies,and inarangeoffrequencybandssubjecttoappropriateequipmentauthorizationproceduresto ensurethatauthorizeddevicesoperatewithinthelimitationsanadministrationappliestothe frequencybandsinwhichthesesystemsarepermittedtooperate. 16 DOCUMENTWAC/052(Ol.09.09) UnitedStatesofAmerica DRAFTPROPOSALSFORTHEWORKOFTHECONFERENCE WRC-12AgendaItem1.22:toexaminetheeffectofemissionsfromshort-range devicesonradiocommunicationservices,inaccordancewithResolution 953(WRC-07). BACKGROUND:Resolution953(WRC-07)requeststheITU-RtostudyemissionsfromSRDs, inparticularRFIDs,insideandoutsidethefrequencybandsdesignatedintheRadioRegulations forISMapplicationstoensureadequateprotectionofradiocommunicationservices. TheUnitedStates,likemanyotheradministrations,hasadoptedaflexibleregulatoryregime, primarilyintheISMbands,thatsetsbasictechnicalrequirementsthatfacilitatespectrumsharing
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1994A3.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1994A3.txt
  • d) thatReportlTU-RBT.2069providesspectrumusageandoperationalcharacteristicsof terrestrialENG,televisionoutsidebroadcat(TYOB)andEFPsystems, noting a) thatwhenaninternationalnews-worthyeventhappens,broadcastersoftenhavelittleto noleadtimeinwhichtopreparefordeployment; b) thatthereisacriticalrequirementtoperformimmediatespectrummanagementactions, includingfrequencycoordination,haringandspectrumreuse,withinanadministrationwherean internationalnews-worthyeventtakesplace; c) thattheidentificationoffrequencyavailabilitywithinindividllaladministrationswith.in whichequipmentcouldoperate,ortheuseofspectrum-flexibleequipmentthatallowsfor operationinvariouspectrumaccesscenarios,mayeasetheinteroperabiLilyand/ornetworking, withmutualcooperationandconsultation,especiallyininternationalnews-worthyeventsthat drawbroadcastersregionallyorglobally, n.otingfurther thatitisintheinterestofadminitrationsandtheirbroadcasterstohaveacce.stoupdated informationonnationalspectrumplann.ingforENGuse, resolves I toencourageadministrationstoconsiderglobaland/orregionalfrequencybands/ranges forENGwhenundertakingtheirnationalplanningandtocommunicatethisinformationtothe broadcastingcommunity; 2 toencourageandassistthebroadcastingcommunityindevelopingadatabaseofavailable frequencies,technicalandoperationalrequirements,andspectrumauthorizationpointsofcontact asappropriateforglobalusageofENGsystems, 4 instructstheDirectoroftheRadiocommunicationBureau I toassistthebroadcastingcommunityincoordinatingtheirENGusageforregional/global internationalnews-worthyeventsbymaintainingalinkontheITU-Rwebsitetoacommunity databaseofcurrentlyavailableENGfrequencies,ENGtechnicalandoperationalrequirements, andspectrumauthorizationpointofcontactasappropriate; 2 toreportontheprogressonthisResolutiontosubsequentWorldRadiocommunication Conferences, urgesadministrations I toprovidethebroadcastingcommunitywiththerelevantinformationconcerningtheir nationalENGfrequencyallocations,ENGspectrummanagementpractices,andappropriate governmentalpoints-of-contactforENGusagewithintheiradminitration; 2 toassistthebroadcatingcommunityinkeepingthedatabaseuptodateonanongoing basisbynotifyingthebroadcastingcommunityofanymodificationstotheinformationrequested above. Reasons:InformationonENGusagearoundtheworld,whichthebroadcasterscanmaintainina database,wouldenablebroadcasterstoobtainaccessasnecessary.Resolution[USA-l.S-ENG] providesamechanismtorationalizeENGspectrumusagebymaintainingadatabaseofcountry specificENGbandswithrequiredtechnicalandoperationalrequirementsfordeployment.This willprovideforeignnewscasterswiththeneededinformationtoensurethattheydeploywith equipmentthatwilloperatewithinagivencountryandallowbroadcasterstoseekapprovalfor spectrumuse.Itwillalsoprovidemanufactlll'erswithaknowledgebaseofrequiredspectrum parametersthatwillenablethemtobuildcommon-useequipmentthatwillleverageeconomies- of-scalefortheworldwideENGmarket. 5 UNITEDSTATESOFAMERICA DRAFTPROPOSALSFORTHEWORKOFTHECONFERENCE AgendaItem1.19: toconsiderregulatDlymeasuresandtheirrelevance,inordertoenablethe introductionofsoftware-definedradioandcognitiveradiosystems,basedon.theresultsofIlU-R studies,in.accordancewithResolution 956(WRC-07) BackgroundInformation:Resolution956(WRC·07),complementarytoWRCagendaitem1.19, considersanumberofmeansforimplementingoftware-definedradioandcognitiveradiosystem technologies.Theseincludetheposibleuseofaworldwideharmonizedcognitivesupportingpilot channelandtheusefulnessofhavingmeanstoassistinthedeterminationoflocalspectrumusage, uchaswirelessorwiredaccesstoadatabaseortoothernetworkstosupportaccessand connectivity,andthereforesupporttheuseofthesesystems.Resolution956(WRC-07)alsonotes thatwithoutadditionalmeans,itmaynotbepossibleforaradiosystemtodiscoverreceive-only usage.Receive-onlysystemswouldincludethoseoperatinginEarthexploration-satellite(passive) andradioastronomyallocations. VariousITU-RgroupshavegenerallyagreedthattheSDR/CRStechnologiescouldpotentiallybe implementedinstationsaspartofanyradiocommunicationservice,exceptperhapsinsomepassive remotesensingservice.Thisfindingpointtothelackofpracticalityinaddinggenericprovisions forSDRandCRStechnologiesintheRadioRegulations. TheConstitution(CS)ofI'helTU,No.197,stipulatethat"allstations,whatevertheirpurpose,must beestablishedandoperatedinsuchamannerasnottocauseharmfulinterferencetotheradio servicesorcommunicationsofotherMemberStaresorofrecognizedoperatingagencies,orofother dulyauthorizedoperatingagencieswhichcarryonaradioservice,andwhichoperateinaccordance withtheprovisionsoftheRadioRegulations."NoneedforanyadditionalprovisionsintheRadio RegulationstoenabletheintroductionofCRSandSDRtechnologiesinstationsofany radiocommunicationservicehasbeenidentified.Furthermore,thereisnoneedforsimilaror redundantprovisionsintheRadioRegulationstoguaranteethatthesetechnologieswillnotdeprive stationsinanyradiocommunicationservice,usinganyothertechnology,fromoperatingintheir alloc,tedandassignedbandsinaccordancewiththeexistingRadioRegulations. P.-oposa(: ARTICLEI Termsanddefinitions NOC USA/AI1.19/1 Reasons:NochangestoArticleI(Termsanddefinitions)oftheRadioRegulationsarenecessaryto enabletheintroductionofSDRandCRStechnologies.ThisiconsistentwithCPMMethodA(no regulatorychangesrequiredforSDR). 6 ARTICLE5 Frequencyallocations NOC USNAI1.19/2 Reasons:NochangestoArticle5(Frequencyallocations)oftheRadioRegulationsarenecessaryto enabletheintroductionofSDRandCRStechnologies.ThisisconsistentwithCPMMethodA(no regulatorychangesrequiredforSDR). 7 UNITEDSTATESOFAMERICA DRAFTPROPOSALSFORTHEWORKOFTHECONFERENCE AgendaItem1.22: ExaminetheejfecIofemissionsjromshort-rangedeviceson radiocommunicationservices,inaccordancewithResolution953(WRC-07) BackgroundInformation:TheUnitedStatesimplementsatlexibleregulatoryregimeintheISM andcertainotherbands,settingbasictechnicalrequirementsthatfacilitatespectrumharingamong license-exemptandshort-rangedeviceswhileminimizingconstraintsonproductdeigns.This regimehasledtotheimplementationofavarietyoflicense-exemptandshort-rangedevices. TheUnitedStatesbelievesthattheregulationofshort-rangedevicesisprimarilyanationalmatter. Basedonexperiencewithimplementationofshort-rangedevices,thereisnoneedforany modificationtotheinternationalRadioRegulationstoaccommodatethem. PI'oposal: ARTICLE1 Termsanddefinitions NOC
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-763A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-763A2.txt
  • the United States is opposed to any proposals to modify Radio Regulations for Region 2 services in the band 790-862 MHz. The U.S. also seeks to avoid undue constraints that may impede worldwide introduction of new telecommunications services in the band 790-862 MHz. 19 Document WAC/026(31.03.09) WAC Informal Working Group (IWG)-2 Draft Modifications to NTIA's Preliminary View on Agenda Item 1.19 (see WAC/005(13.01.09)) UNITED STATES OF AMERICA DRAFT PRELIMINARY VIEWS ON WRC-11 AGENDA ITEM 1.19: to consider regulatory measures and their relevance, in order to enable the introduction of software-defined radio and cognitive radio systems, based on the results of ITU-R studies, in accordance with Resolution 956 (WRC-07) ISSUE: Resolution 956 (WRC-07) calls for studies into the potential need for regulatory
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-763A3.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-763A3.txt
  • 1.12 (Resolution 754 (WRC-07) ­ Consideration of modification of the aeronautical component of the mobile service allocation in the 37-38 GHz band for protection of other primary services in the band); f) Agenda Item 1.13 (Resolution 551 (WRC-07) ­ Use of the band 21.4-22 GHz for broadcasting-satellite service and associated feeder-link bands in Regions 1 and 3); g) Agenda Item 1.19 (Resolution 956 (WRC-07) ­ Regulatory measures and their relevance to enable the introduction of software-defined radio and cognitive radio systems); h) Agenda Item 1.20 (Resolution 734 (WRC-07) ­ Studies for spectrum identification for gateway links for high-altitude platform stations in the range from 5 850 to 7 075 MHz); and i) Agenda Item 1.22 (Resolution 953 (WRC-07) ­ Protection of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1348A1_Rcd.pdf
  • No Telefonica 02 Incumbent O2 Internet Pro DSL 16 Mbps / 786 kbps National CZK 1050 $70.23 n/a Activation: 1.00 purchase for 990.02 No 24 month No Czech Republic GTS Novera Entrant DSL Fun (aggregation - 1:50) DSL 8 Mbps / 512 kbps National CZK 470.05 $31.44 Self: 178.50; "small" installation: 1547.00; "large" installation: 2380.00 none Various modems available. Basic: 1.19 w/ 18 mo. Contact; 708.05 w/ 12 mo. Contract; 946.05 w/ no contract No month-month Yes (reg. price unknown) http://www.gtsnovera.cz/en/products/d ata/novera_dsl.shtml/ GTS Novera Entrant DSL Fun (aggregation - 1:50) DSL 16 Mbps / 768 kbps National CZK 708.05 $47.36 Self: 178.50; "small" installation: 1547.00; "large" installation: 2380.00 none Various modems available. Basic: 1.19 w/ 18 mo. Contact; 708.05 w/ 12
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1348A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1348A2.txt
  • month No Telefonica 02 Incumbent O2 Internet Pro DSL 16 Mbps / 786 kbps National CZK 1050 $70.23 n/a Activation: 1.00 purchase for 990.02 No 24 month No Czech Republic GTS Novera Entrant DSL Fun (aggregation - 1:50) DSL 8 Mbps / 512 kbps National CZK 470.05 $31.44 Self: 178.50; "small" installation: 1547.00; "large" installation: 2380.00none Various modems available. Basic: 1.19 w/ 18 mo. Contact; 708.05 w/ 12 mo. Contract; 946.05 w/ no contract No month-month Yes (reg. price unknown) http://www.gtsnovera.cz/en/products/data/novera_dsl.shtml/ GTS Novera Entrant DSL Fun (aggregation - 1:50) DSL 16 Mbps / 768 kbps National CZK 708.05 $47.36 Self: 178.50; "small" installation: 1547.00; "large" installation: 2380.00none Various modems available. Basic: 1.19 w/ 18 mo. Contact; 708.05 w/ 12 mo. Contract;
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1454A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1454A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1454A1.txt
  • translators, low-power stations, and Class A stations. Columbia County has no significantly viewed in-state stations. On average, households in Hempstead County receive 2.56 in-state, full-power Arkansas stations over the air and 3.59 in-state stations including full-power stations, translators, low-power stations, and Class A stations. There are no significantly viewed stations in Hempstead County. On average, households in Howard County receive 1.19 in-state, full-power stations over the air and 1.91 in-state stations including full-power stations, translators, low-power stations, and Class A stations. Howard County has no significantly viewed in-state stations. On average, households in Lafayette County receive 2.75 in-state, full-power stations over -the air and 2.76 in-state stations including full-power stations, translators, low-power stations, and Class A stations. There are no significantly
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-447A3.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-447A3.txt
  • Protection of radiocommunication services from emissions by short-range radio devices SUP 1.22 RES 954 (WRC-07) Harmonisation of spectrum for use by terrestrial electronic news gathering systems SUP 1.5 RES 955 (WRC-07) Consideration of procedures for free-space optical links SUP 1.6 RES 956 (WRC-07) Regulatory measures and their relevance to enable the introduction of software-defined radio and cognitive radio systems SUP 1.19 ATTACHMENT 25 RECOMMENDATION FCC NTIA Comments WRC-12 Agenda Item REC 7 (Rev.WRC-97) Adoption of standard forms for ship station and ship earth station licences and aircraft station and aircraft earth station licences NOC ANNEX 1 Principles for the formulation of standard ship and aircraft station licences NOC ANNEX 2 NOC ANNEX 3 NOC REC 8 Relating to automatic identification of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-447A3_Rcd.pdf
  • um for use by terrestrial electronic news gat heri ng system s SUP 1.5 RES 955 (WRC-07) Consi deration of proce dures for free -space optical links SUP 1.6 RES 956 (WRC-07) Regulatory m easures and t heir relevance to enable t he i ntroduction of sof tware- define d ra dio a nd cognitive radi o syste ms SUP 1.19 3615 ATTACH MENT RECO MME NDATIO N FCC NTIA Com ments WRC-12Age nda Item REC 7 (Rev.W RC- 97) Adoption of standard forms for ship station an d ship earth station licen ces an d aircraft station and aircraft earth station licen ces NOC AN NE X 1 Pr inciples for t he f orm ulation of standa rd s
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-2A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-2A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-2A1.txt
  • (116) Contour Measure 2005 2.04 2.17 2.40 (108) (64) (42) 2007 2.31 2.46 2.51 (98) (73) (59) 2009 1.70 1.76 1.77 (103) (68) (75) Religion Format Market Measure 2005 2.14 1.65 1.30 * (55) (41) (52) 2007 1.53 1.85 1.33 (39) (32) (62) 2009 1.18 1.59 0.88 (34) (36) (57) Contour Measure 2005 1.70 1.55 1.93 (73) (42) (33) 2007 1.19 1.51 1.95 * (53) (40) (40) 2009 0.88 1.22 1.46 * (53) (31) (43) Table 11 (continued) Average Full-Service Commercial FM Stations' Revenue per Adult by Format Year No LPFM One LPFM Two or More LPFM News/Talk/Sports Format Market Measure 2005 3.02 2.35 2.46 (35) (20) (44) 2007 2.83 2.87 2.19 (25) (33) (71) 2009 1.94 1.94 1.66 (38) (46)
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-215526A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-215526A1.txt
  • Sample Cities with Measured/Message Service 83 83 84 84 84 87 87 86 85 85 85 85 Cost of a Five-Minute Business-Day Same-Zone Call $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.10 Basic Connection Charge $71.05 $71.36 $72.75 $72.55 $71.41 $69.88 $67.87 $68.47 $68.67 $65.83 $67.87 $67.77 Additional Connection Charge for Touch-Tone Service 1.70 1.89 1.13 1.19 1.17 0.92 0.27 0.17 0.17 0.12 0.12 0.12 Tax 4.06 4.15 4.32 4.33 4.25 4.13 4.17 4.20 4.45 4.13 4.53 4.40 Total Connection Charge $76.81 $77.40 $78.20 $78.07 $76.83 $74.93 $72.31 $72.85 $73.29 $70.09 $72.55 $72.29 Additional Charge if Drop Line and Connection Block Needed $5.92 $7.87 $6.90 $6.83 $6.64 $6.49 $7.28 $6.98 $6.54 $6.54 $6.65 $6.62 Lowest-Cost Inside Wiring
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-226838A8.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-226838A8.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-226838A8.txt
  • CL HITS 83 1.31 EZ/SAC 3 0.05 E 14 0.22 FS 202 3.69 EZ 13 0.21 FS/T 41 0.75 EZ/SAC 1 0.02 G 55 1 FS 96 1.52 G/B 1 0.02 FS/T 81 1.28 Jazz (J) 59 1.08 G 62 0.98 News (N) 37 0.68 J 118 1.87 News/Talk (N/T) 161 2.94 KIDS 1 0.02 NAC/AOR 2 0.04 N 75 1.19 O 352 6.43 N/T 170 2.69 Religious (REL) 200 3.65 O 394 6.24 Soft Adult Contemp. (SAC) 379 6.92 REL 276 4.37 SP 172 3.14 SAC 253 4.01 Sports (SPRTS) 70 1.28 SP 296 4.69 Talk 247 4.51 SPRTS 172 2.72 T/O 4 0.07 T 408 6.46 Unknown 360 6.57 T/CL AOR 7 0.11 T/J 5 0.08 UNK 6 0.1
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-248493A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-248493A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-248493A1.txt
  • text given in the public notice. IWG WRC-07 Agenda Item Type of Document Document No. 1 1.2 Draft Preliminary View on WRC-07 WAC/025(08.06.04) 1 1.5 Draft Preliminary View on WRC-07 WAC/026(08.06.04) 2 1.6 (Resolution 415) Draft Preliminary View on WRC-07 WAC/018(08.06.04) 2 1.8 (Resolution 122) Draft Preliminary View on WRC-07 WAC/019(08.06.04) 2 1.18 Draft Preliminary View on WRC-07 WAC/021(08.06.04) 2 1.19 Draft Preliminary View on WRC-07 WAC/023(08.06.04) 2 1.21 Draft Preliminary View on WRC-07 WAC/024(08.06.04) 2 1.8 (Resolution 145) Comments on NTIA Draft Preliminary View WAC/020(08.06.04) 2 1.18 Comments on NTIA Draft Preliminary View WAC/022(08.06.04) 3 1.4 Draft Preliminary View on WRC-07 WAC/016(08.06.04) 4 1.15 Draft Preliminary View on WRC-07 WAC/015(08.06.04) 5 1.10 Draft Preliminary View on WRC-07 WAC/012(08.06.04) 5 1.12
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-249262A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-249262A1.txt
  • 1.61 1966 32.3 100.1 47.6 52.5 18.9 30.1 3.10 1.47 1.63 1.59 1.61 1967 39.7 114.2 54.6 59.6 23.4 31.8 2.88 1.38 1.50 1.36 1.45 1968 46.4 126.9 61.5 65.4 28.2 40.0 2.73 1.33 1.41 1.42 1.41 1969 64.6 172.0 82.7 89.4 38.3 51.6 2.66 1.28 1.38 1.35 1.37 1970 81.1 196.6 98.9 97.7 51.0 59.8 2.43 1.22 1.21 1.17 1.19 1971 100.9 237.4 120.7 116.6 68.4 75.1 2.35 1.20 1.16 1.10 1.13 1972 126.5 291.8 148.2 143.6 91.7 98.6 2.31 1.17 1.14 1.08 1.11 1973 159.3 364.9 184.4 180.5 111.5 120.2 2.29 1.16 1.13 1.08 1.11 1974 190.7 428.7 216.6 212.1 142.0 152.2 2.25 1.14 1.11 1.07 1.09 1975 219.4 490.2 247.4 242.9 167.0 176.9 2.23 1.13 1.11 1.06 1.09
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-256563A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-256563A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-256563A1.txt
  • systems, but do not use public rights-of-way. PCOs focus principally on serving small numbers of subscribers living in multiple dwelling units (MDUs) and other private communities. As of June 2003, there were about 1.2 million subscribers to PCO services, representing 1.34 percent of all MVPD subscribers. As of June 2004, there were about 1.1 million subscribers to PCO services, representing 1.19 percent of the total number of MVPD households, a decline since our last Report. Internet Video: Over the past year, video provided over the Internet has grown and promises to become an increasingly strong product in the market for the delivery of video programming. Most instances of video streamed over the web, however, are still not of broadcast quality, and
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-261024A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-261024A2.txt
  • 1.61 1966 32.3 100.1 47.6 52.5 18.9 30.1 3.10 1.47 1.63 1.59 1.61 1967 39.7 114.2 54.6 59.6 23.4 31.8 2.88 1.38 1.50 1.36 1.45 1968 46.4 126.9 61.5 65.4 28.2 40.0 2.73 1.33 1.41 1.42 1.41 1969 64.6 172.0 82.7 89.4 38.3 51.6 2.66 1.28 1.38 1.35 1.37 1970 81.1 196.6 98.9 97.7 51.0 59.8 2.43 1.22 1.21 1.17 1.19 1971 100.9 237.4 120.7 116.6 68.4 75.1 2.35 1.20 1.16 1.10 1.13 1972 126.5 291.8 148.2 143.6 91.7 98.6 2.31 1.17 1.14 1.08 1.11 1973 159.3 364.9 184.4 180.5 111.5 120.2 2.29 1.16 1.13 1.08 1.11 1974 190.7 428.7 216.6 212.1 142.0 152.2 2.25 1.14 1.11 1.07 1.09 1975 219.4 490.2 247.4 242.9 167.0 176.9 2.23 1.13 1.11 1.06 1.09
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A1.txt
  • Payments - Total by State or Jurisdiction ........................... Table 3.14 High-Cost Support Payments - Total by State - ILECs and CETCs ...................Table 3.15 High-Cost Support Payments - Total by Study Area ..................................... Table 3.30 High-Cost Support Mechanisms ­ Monthly Support per Loop by State .............. Table 3.16 Income - Net ........................................................................................................... Table 11.5 Information for Allocating CLEC Revenues .............................................. Table 1.19 Information for Allocating Incumbent Local Exchange Revenues .....................Table 1.18 Information for Allocating Interstate Access Revenues .................................. Table 1.22 Information for Allocating Interstate Toll ...................................................Table 1.26 Information for Allocating Intrastate Access Revenues .................................. Table 1.23 Information for Allocating LEC Intrastate Toll ............................................ Table 1.24 Information for Allocating Mobile Wireless Revenues .................................. Table 1.20 Information for Allocating Non-LEC Intrastate Toll ......................................Table 1.25
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A2.txt
  • Payments - Total by State or Jurisdiction ........................... Table 3.14 High-Cost Support Payments - Total by State - ILECs and CETCs ...................Table 3.15 High-Cost Support Payments - Total by Study Area ..................................... Table 3.30 High-Cost Support Mechanisms ­ Monthly Support per Loop by State .............. Table 3.16 Income - Net ........................................................................................................... Table 11.5 Information for Allocating CLEC Revenues .............................................. Table 1.19 Information for Allocating Incumbent Local Exchange Revenues .....................Table 1.18 Information for Allocating Interstate Access Revenues .................................. Table 1.22 Information for Allocating Interstate Toll ...................................................Table 1.26 Information for Allocating Intrastate Access Revenues .................................. Table 1.23 Information for Allocating LEC Intrastate Toll ............................................ Table 1.24 Information for Allocating Mobile Wireless Revenues .................................. Table 1.20 Information for Allocating Non-LEC Intrastate Toll ......................................Table 1.25
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A3.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A3.txt
  • revenues for allocation are the product of reported ILECs' local exchange service and miscellaneous revenues and the adjustment formula in Table 1.17. Allocation percentages in each state are the ratio of the state's allocation revenues to nationwide revenues. Local exchange revenues by type are determined by multiplying the allocation factor by the type of revenues (see Table 1.14). In Table 1.19, we allocate interstate and intrastate CLEC revenues on a state-by-state basis by multiplying national revenues (see Table 1.14) by an allocation percentage. For those states with 22 Estimated intrastate telephone revenues for Alaska, American Samoa, Guam, the Northern Mariana Islands, and the Virgin Islands are determined by multiplying the nationwide average intrastate telephone revenues per loop by number of loops
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A5.txt
  • in Unseparated High-Cost Loop Unseparated Number NTS Revenue Support Payment KANSAS Cont. 411841 C UNITED TELEPHONE ASSN. INC. 18.99 -4.95 25.19 30.85 411842 C UNITED TELEPHONE CO OF KS -1.87 -6.41 4.85 -0.06 411845 C WAMEGO TELEPHONE COMPANY INC. 10.59 -3.07 14.10 54.16 411847 C WHEAT STATE TELEPHONE, INC. 3.05 -0.78 3.86 2.82 411849 C WILSON TELEPHONE COMPANY INC. 7.92 -1.19 9.22 13.66 411852 C ZENDA TELEPHONE COMPANY INC. 2.00 -4.26 6.53 3.54 411957 C THE UTC OF MO DBA UTC OF SE. KS -2.90 -2.64 -0.27 0.00 412030 C TOTAH TELEPHONE CO. INC. 23.67 -1.65 25.75 53.05 415214 C SOUTHWESTERN BELL-KANSAS -7.97 -6.19 -1.90 0.00 KENTUCKY Total 0.74 -3.51 4.40 4.80 260396 A BALLARD RURAL TEL. COOP. CORP., INC. 12.72
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A9.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A9.txt
  • 47.51 Number of Sample Cities with Measured/Message Service 83 83 84 84 84 87 87 86 85 85 85 85 85 86 85 85 Cost of a Five-Minute Business-Day Same-Zone Call $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.10 $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.10 Basic Connection Charge $71.05$71.36$72.75$72.55$71.41$69.88$67.87$68.47$68.67$65.83$67.87$67.77$67.04$67.29$67.23$67.24 Additional Connection Charge for Touch-Tone Service**** 1.70 1.89 1.13 1.19 1.17 0.92 0.27 0.17 0.17 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12 **** **** **** Taxes 4.06 4.15 4.32 4.33 4.25 4.13 4.17 4.20 4.45 4.13 4.53 4.40 4.69 5.09 6.95 6.93 Total Connection Charge 76.81 77.40 78.20 78.07 76.83 74.93 72.31 72.85 73.29 70.09 72.55 72.29 71.86 72.39 74.18 74.17 Additional Charge If Drop Line and Connection Block Needed $5.92 $7.87 $6.90
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-266857A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-266857A1.txt
  • 85 85 86 85 86 86 Cost of a Five-Minute, Business-Day, Same-Zone Call $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.10 $0.10 Basic Connection Charge $71.05 $71.36 $72.75 $72.55 $71.41 $69.88 $67.87 $68.47 $68.67 $65.83 $67.87 $67.77 $67.04 $67.29 $67.23 $67.24 $67.35 Additional Connection Charge for Touch-Tone Service 4 1.70 1.89 1.13 1.19 1.17 0.92 0.27 0.17 0.17 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12 a4 a4 a4 a4 Tax, Including 911 Charges 4.06 4.15 4.32 4.33 4.25 4.13 4.17 4.20 4.45 4.13 4.53 4.40 4.69 5.09 6.95 6.42 6.35 Total Connection Charge $76.81 $77.40 $78.20 $78.07 $76.83 $74.93 $72.31 $72.85 $73.29 $70.09 $72.55 $72.29 $71.86 $72.39 $74.18 $74.18 $73.70 Additional Charge if Drop Line and
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A1.txt
  • 3.31 ILEC High-Cost Loop Support Data - Percentage Changes by State or Jurisdiction Table 3.18 ILEC High-Cost Loop Support Data - Percentage Changes by Study Area ...........Table 3.32 ILEC Loops - by State or Jurisdiction ..................................................... Table 3.20 ILEC Loops - by Study Area ............................................................... Table 3.34 Income - Net ........................................................................................................... Table 11.5 Information for Allocating CLEC Revenues .............................................. Table 1.19 Information for Allocating Incumbent Local Exchange Revenues .....................Table 1.18 Information for Allocating Interstate Access Revenues .................................. Table 1.22 Information for Allocating Interstate Toll ...................................................Table 1.26 Information for Allocating Intrastate Access Revenues .................................. Table 1.23 Information for Allocating LEC Intrastate Toll ............................................ Table 1.24 Information for Allocating Mobile Wireless Revenues .................................. Table 1.20 Information for Allocating Non-LEC Intrastate Toll ......................................Table 1.25
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A2.txt
  • 3.31 ILEC High-Cost Loop Support Data - Percentage Changes by State or Jurisdiction Table 3.18 ILEC High-Cost Loop Support Data - Percentage Changes by Study Area ...........Table 3.32 ILEC Loops - by State or Jurisdiction ..................................................... Table 3.20 ILEC Loops - by Study Area ............................................................... Table 3.34 Income - Net ........................................................................................................... Table 11.5 Information for Allocating CLEC Revenues .............................................. Table 1.19 Information for Allocating Incumbent Local Exchange Revenues .....................Table 1.18 Information for Allocating Interstate Access Revenues .................................. Table 1.22 Information for Allocating Interstate Toll ...................................................Table 1.26 Information for Allocating Intrastate Access Revenues .................................. Table 1.23 Information for Allocating LEC Intrastate Toll ............................................ Table 1.24 Information for Allocating Mobile Wireless Revenues .................................. Table 1.20 Information for Allocating Non-LEC Intrastate Toll ......................................Table 1.25
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A3.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A3.txt
  • revenues for allocation are the product of reported ILECs' local exchange service and miscellaneous revenues and the adjustment formula in Table 1.17. Allocation percentages in each state are the ratio of the state's allocation revenues to nationwide revenues. Local exchange revenues by type are determined by multiplying the allocation factor by the type of revenues (see Table 1.14). In Table 1.19, we allocate interstate and intrastate CLEC revenues on a state-by-state basis by multiplying national revenues (see Table 1.14) by an allocation percentage. For those states with publicly available data on CLEC lines that exceed 100,000, the allocation percentage is determined by dividing the number of CLEC lines as reported in FCC Form 477 by nationwide CLEC lines.27 It is more
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A5.txt
  • 6.93 19.13 401713 C NORTHERN ARKANSAS TEL. CO.,INC. -4.95 -1.03 -3.96 -11.51 401718 C PRAIRIE GROVE TELEPHONE COMPANY 4.12 -0.78 4.94 5.21 401720 C CENTURYTEL OF REDFIELD, INC. 2.19 0.10 2.09 -0.27 401721 C RICE BELT TEL. CO.,INC. 2.00 -1.63 3.69 1.13 401722 A E. RITTER TELEPHONE COMPANY 1.30 -7.01 8.94 18.41 401724 C SOUTHWEST ARKANSAS TEL. COOP. INC. 5.67 1.19 4.43 5.82 401726 C TRI-COUNTY TEL. CO. INC.-AR 5.25 2.70 2.49 3.59 401727 C CENTURYTEL OF SOUTH ARKANSAS, INC. 1.44 -1.57 3.06 0.58 401729 C WALNUT HILL TELEPHONE COMPANY 15.69 -0.28 16.00 22.37 401733 C YELCOT TEL. CO.,INC. 3.34 -6.58 10.62 20.93 401734 C ARKWEST COMMUNICATIONS, INC. (YELL COUNTY) 10.65 2.28 8.19 17.31 403031 C SCOTT COUNTY TELEPHONE COMPANY -9.60
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A9.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A9.txt
  • of Sample Cities with Measured/Message Service 83 83 84 84 84 87 87 86 85 85 85 85 85 86 85 86 86 Cost of a Five-Minute Business-Day Same-Zone Call $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.10 $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.10 $0.10 Basic Connection Charge $71.05$71.36$72.75$72.55$71.41$69.88$67.87$68.47$68.67$65.83$67.87$67.77$67.04$67.29$67.23$67.24$67.35 Additional Connection Charge for Touch-Tone Service**** 1.70 1.89 1.13 1.19 1.17 0.92 0.27 0.17 0.17 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12 **** **** **** **** Taxes 4.06 4.15 4.32 4.33 4.25 4.13 4.17 4.20 4.45 4.13 4.53 4.40 4.69 5.09 6.95 6.42 6.35 Total Connection Charge 76.81 77.40 78.20 78.07 76.83 74.93 72.31 72.85 73.29 70.09 72.55 72.29 71.86 72.39 74.18 74.18 73.70 Additional Charge If Drop Line and Connection Block Needed
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-270407A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-270407A1.txt
  • 85 85 86 85 86 86 Cost of a Five-Minute Same-Zone Business-Day Call $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.10 $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.10 $0.10 Basic Connection Charge $71.05 $71.36 $72.75 $72.55 $71.41 $69.88 $67.87 $68.47 $68.67 $65.83 $67.87 $67.77 $67.04 $67.29 $67.23 $67.24 $67.35 Additional Connection Charge for Touch-Tone Service 4 1.70 1.89 1.13 1.19 1.17 0.92 0.27 0.17 0.17 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12 4 4 4 4 Taxes, Including 911 Charges 4.06 4.15 4.32 4.33 4.25 4.13 4.17 4.20 4.45 4.13 4.53 4.40 4.69 5.09 6.95 6.42 6.35 Total Connection Charge $76.81 $77.40 $78.20 $78.07 $76.83 $74.93 $72.31 $72.85 $73.29 $70.09 $72.55 $72.29 $71.86 $72.39 $74.18 $74.18 $73.70 Additional Charge if Drop Line and
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A1.txt
  • 3.31 ILEC High-Cost Loop Support Data - Percentage Changes by State or Jurisdiction Table 3.18 ILEC High-Cost Loop Support Data - Percentage Changes by Study Area ...........Table 3.32 ILEC Loops - by State or Jurisdiction ..................................................... Table 3.20 ILEC Loops - by Study Area ............................................................... Table 3.34 Income - Net ........................................................................................................... Table 11.5 Information for Allocating CLEC Revenues .............................................. Table 1.19 Information for Allocating Incumbent Local Exchange Revenues .....................Table 1.18 Information for Allocating Interstate Access Revenues .................................. Table 1.22 Information for Allocating Interstate Toll ...................................................Table 1.26 Information for Allocating Intrastate Access Revenues .................................. Table 1.23 Information for Allocating LEC Intrastate Toll ............................................ Table 1.24 Information for Allocating Mobile Wireless Revenues .................................. Table 1.20 3 Index of Tables and Charts Information for
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A2.txt
  • 3.31 ILEC High-Cost Loop Support Data - Percentage Changes by State or Jurisdiction Table 3.18 ILEC High-Cost Loop Support Data - Percentage Changes by Study Area ...........Table 3.32 ILEC Loops - by State or Jurisdiction ..................................................... Table 3.20 ILEC Loops - by Study Area ............................................................... Table 3.34 Income - Net ........................................................................................................... Table 11.5 Information for Allocating CLEC Revenues .............................................. Table 1.19 Information for Allocating Incumbent Local Exchange Revenues .....................Table 1.18 Information for Allocating Interstate Access Revenues .................................. Table 1.22 Information for Allocating Interstate Toll ...................................................Table 1.26 Information for Allocating Intrastate Access Revenues .................................. Table 1.23 Information for Allocating LEC Intrastate Toll ............................................ Table 1.24 Information for Allocating Mobile Wireless Revenues .................................. Table 1.20 3 Index of Tables and Charts Information for
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A3.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A3.txt
  • revenues for allocation are the product of reported ILECs' local exchange service and miscellaneous revenues and the adjustment formula in Table 1.17. Allocation percentages in each state are the ratio of the state's allocation revenues to nationwide revenues. Local exchange revenues by type are determined by multiplying the allocation factor by the type of revenues (see Table 1.14). In Table 1.19, we allocate interstate and intrastate CLEC revenues on a state-by-state basis by multiplying national revenues (see Table 1.14) by an allocation percentage. The allocation percentage is determined by dividing the number of CLEC lines in a state, as reported in FCC Form 477, by nationwide CLEC lines.30 In Table 1.20, we allocate interstate and intrastate mobile wireless revenues on a
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A4.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A4.txt
  • 6.25 8.25 6.65 Indiana 7.27 8.25 7.53 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 7.27 8.25 7.53 7.27 8.25 7.53 Iowa 5.25 8.25 7.13 0.00 3.50 0.49 0.00 1.75 0.25 5.25 10.00 7.38 5.25 13.50 7.87 Kansas 6.75 8.25 7.30 0.00 3.50 3.50 0.00 1.75 1.75 6.75 10.00 9.05 6.75 13.50 12.55 Kentucky 6.99 8.25 8.12 0.00 3.50 2.38 0.00 1.75 1.19 6.99 10.00 9.31 6.99 13.50 11.69 Louisiana 8.25 8.25 8.25 0.00 3.50 0.00 0.00 1.75 0.00 8.25 10.00 8.25 8.25 13.50 8.25 Maine 8.15 8.25 8.17 0.00 3.50 3.50 0.00 1.75 1.75 8.15 10.00 9.92 8.15 13.50 13.42 Maryland 7.43 8.25 7.43 0.84 3.50 3.50 0.42 1.75 1.75 7.85 10.00 9.18 8.69 13.50 12.68 Massachusetts 8.15 8.25 8.15 3.50 3.50
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A5.txt
  • C VOLCANO TELEPHONE COMPANY -2.51 0.24 -2.75 -9.12 542344 C VERIZON WEST COAST INC.-CA -36.21 -3.43 -33.94 0.00 542346 C PINNACLES TELEPHONE COMPANY 6.96 -3.82 11.21 8.54 543402 C CITIZENS TEL CO OF GOLDEN ST DBA FRONTIER COM -10.79 -1.32 -9.60 -48.86 544342 C CITIZENS TEL CO OF TUOLUMNE DBA FRONTIER COMM -8.36 -0.90 -7.53 -35.04 545170 C PACIFIC BELL 1.19 -3.11 4.43 0.00 TOTAL COLORADO -1.60 -5.08 3.66 5.80 461835 C SUNFLOWER TELEPHONE CO.,INC. - CO -16.22 3.57 -19.11 -29.59 462178 C AGATE MUTUAL TELEPHONE COOPERATIVE ASSOC. -10.87 0.67 -11.46 -14.30 462181 C BIJOU TEL COOPERATIVE ASSOC. INC 0.03 -2.58 2.67 -0.62 462182 C BLANCA TELEPHONE CO. -0.15 3.63 -3.64 -3.94 462184 C DELTA COUNTY TELE-COMM INC. 1.14 -1.27 2.44
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A9.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A9.txt
  • Cities with Measured/Message Service 83 83 84 84 84 87 87 86 85 85 85 85 85 86 85 86 85 78 Cost of a Five-Minute Business-Day Same-Zone Call $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.10 $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.10 $0.10 $0.09 Basic Connection Charge $71.05$71.36$72.75$72.55$71.41$69.88$67.87$68.47$68.67$65.83$67.87$67.77$67.04$67.29$67.23$67.24$67.35$65.84 Additional Connection Charge for Touch-Tone Service**** 1.70 1.89 1.13 1.19 1.17 0.92 0.27 0.17 0.17 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12 **** **** **** a4 a4 Taxes 4.06 4.15 4.32 4.33 4.25 4.13 4.17 4.20 4.45 4.13 4.53 4.40 4.69 5.09 6.95 6.42 6.15 6.41 Total Connection Charge 76.81 77.40 78.20 78.07 76.83 74.93 72.31 72.85 73.29 70.09 72.55 72.29 71.86 72.39 74.18 74.18 74.18 72.26 Additional Charge If Drop Line and
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279991A1.pdf
  • for the Commission. The various conference agenda items were assigned to the informal working groups as follows: Informal Working Groups (IWG) Agenda Items (Major WRC-07 Issues) IWG-1 ­ Terrestrial and Space Science Services 1.2, 1.3, 1.5, 1.14, 1.16, & 1.20 IWG-2 ­ Satellite Services including those related to High Altitude Platform Stations (HAPS) 1.6 (Resolution 415), 1.7, 1.8, 1.17, 1.18, 1.19, & 1.21 IWG-3 ­ International Mobile Telephone (IMT-2000) & 2.5 GHz 1.4 & 1.9 IWG-4 ­ Broadcasting and Amateur Services 1.6 (Resolution 414), 1.11, 1.13, 1.15, & 7.1 (Recommendation 952) IWG-5 ­ Regulatory Issues 1.1, 1.0, 1.12, 2, 3, 5, 6, & 7.1 Satellite Digital Audio Radio Service Subscribers 0.69 2.10 4.42 6.90 8.25 0.48 1.81 4.68 7.14 0.11 0
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-284932A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-284932A1.txt
  • 89 78 Cost of a Five-Minute Same-Zone Business-Day Call $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.10 $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.10 $0.10 $0.09 $0.10 Basic Connection Charge $71.05 $71.36 $72.75 $72.55 $71.41 $69.88 $67.87 $68.47 $68.67 $65.83 $67.87 $67.77 $67.04 $67.29 $67.23 $67.24 $67.35 $62.95 $63.07 Additional Connection Charge for Touch-Tone Service 4 1.70 1.89 1.13 1.19 1.17 0.92 0.27 0.17 0.17 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12 4 4 4 4 4 4 Taxes, Including 911 Charges 4.06 4.15 4.32 4.33 4.25 4.13 4.17 4.20 4.45 4.13 4.53 4.40 4.69 5.09 6.95 6.42 6.35 6.50 6.11 Total Connection Charge $76.81 $77.40 $78.20 $78.07 $76.83 $74.93 $72.31 $72.85 $73.29 $70.09 $72.55 $72.29 $71.86 $72.39 $74.18 $74.18 $73.70 $74.18 $69.18
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-284934A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-284934A1.txt
  • 78 78 Cost of a Five-Minute, Business-Day, Same-Zone Call $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.10 $0.10 $0.09 $0.11 Basic Connection Charge $71.05 $71.36 $72.75 $72.55 $71.41 $69.88 $67.87 $68.47 $68.67 $65.83 $67.87 $67.77 $67.04 $67.29 $67.23 $67.24 $67.35 $62.55 $62.67 Additional Connection Charge for Touch-Tone Service 4 1.70 1.89 1.13 1.19 1.17 0.92 0.27 0.17 0.17 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12 a4 a4 a4 a4 a4 a4 Tax, Including 911 Charges 4.06 4.15 4.32 4.33 4.25 4.13 4.17 4.20 4.45 4.13 4.53 4.40 4.69 5.09 6.95 6.42 6.15 6.41 6.06 Total Connection Charge $76.81 $77.40 $78.20 $78.07 $76.83 $74.93 $72.31 $72.85 $73.29 $70.09 $72.55 $72.29 $71.86 $72.39 $74.18 $73.66 $73.50 $68.96 $68.74
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287688A1.pdf
  • 3.31 ILEC High-Cost Loop Support Data - Percentage Changes by State or Jurisdiction Table 3.18 ILEC High-Cost Loop Support Data - Percentage Changes by Study Area ...........Table 3.32 ILEC Loops - by State or Jurisdiction ..................................................... Table 3.20 ILEC Loops - by Study Area ............................................................... Table 3.34 Income - Net ........................................................................................................... Table 11.5 Information for Allocating CLEC Revenues .............................................. Table 1.19 Information for Allocating Incumbent Local Exchange Revenues .....................Table 1.18 Information for Allocating Interstate Access Revenues .................................. Table 1.22 Information for Allocating Interstate Toll ...................................................Table 1.26 Information for Allocating Intrastate Access Revenues .................................. Table 1.23 Information for Allocating LEC Intrastate Toll ............................................ Table 1.24 Information for Allocating Mobile Wireless Revenues .................................. Table 1.20 Information for Allocating Non-LEC Intrastate Toll ......................................Table 1.25
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287688A2.pdf
  • 3.31 ILEC High-Cost Loop Support Data - Percentage Changes by State or Jurisdiction Table 3.18 ILEC High-Cost Loop Support Data - Percentage Changes by Study Area ...........Table 3.32 ILEC Loops - by State or Jurisdiction ..................................................... Table 3.20 ILEC Loops - by Study Area ............................................................... Table 3.34 Income - Net ........................................................................................................... Table 11.5 Information for Allocating CLEC Revenues .............................................. Table 1.19 Information for Allocating Incumbent Local Exchange Revenues .....................Table 1.18 Information for Allocating Interstate Access Revenues .................................. Table 1.22 Information for Allocating Interstate Toll ...................................................Table 1.26 Information for Allocating Intrastate Access Revenues .................................. Table 1.23 Information for Allocating LEC Intrastate Toll ............................................ Table 1.24 Information for Allocating Mobile Wireless Revenues .................................. Table 1.20 Information for Allocating Non-LEC Intrastate Toll ......................................Table 1.25
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287688A3.pdf
  • revenues for allocation are the product of reported ILECs' local exchange service and miscellaneous revenues and the adjustment formula in Table 1.17. Allocation percentages in each state are the ratio of the state's allocation revenues to nationwide revenues. Local exchange revenues by type are determined by multiplying the allocation factor by the type of revenues (see Table 1.14). In Table 1.19, we allocate interstate and intrastate CLEC revenues on a state-by-state basis by multiplying national revenues (see Table 1.14) by an allocation percentage. The allocation percentage is determined by dividing the number of CLEC lines in a state, as reported in FCC Form 477, by nationwide CLEC lines.31 In Table 1.20, we allocate interstate and intrastate mobile wireless revenues on a
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287688A5.pdf
  • -3.16 -3.26 0.11 -18.69 300594 A THE CHAMPAIGN TEL. CO. 2.52 -3.91 6.70 0.00 300597 C CHILLICOTHE TEL. CO. -3.51 -2.73 -0.80 -9.93 300598 C MCCLURE TEL. CO. 1.74 -6.32 8.60 4.68 300604 A COLUMBUS GROVE TEL. CO. 0.30 -3.41 3.84 17.85 300606 C CONNEAUT TEL. CO. -3.08 -4.06 1.02 -6.25 300607 C CONTINENTAL TEL. CO. OF OHIO -0.23 -1.41 1.19 -9.70 300609 A DOYLESTOWN TEL. CO. 0.67 -7.49 8.81 0.00 300612 C THE FARMERS MUTUAL TEL. CO.-OKOLONA, OH 5.78 -2.31 8.28 0.00 300613 C LITTLE MIAMI COMM. CORP. -7.22 -5.19 -2.14 -22.75 300614 A FORT JENNINGS TEL. CO. -0.87 -0.94 0.07 -17.45 300615 C VERIZON NORTH INC.-OH -3.42 -8.12 5.11 0.00 300618 A>CGERMANTOWN INDEPENDENT TEL. CO. 50.58 1.48 48.39 3,473.08
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287688A9.pdf
  • 78 78 Cost of a Five-Minute, Business-Day, Same-Zone Call $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.10 $0.10 $0.09 $0.11 Basic Connection Charge $71.05 $71.36 $72.75 $72.55 $71.41 $69.88 $67.87 $68.47 $68.67 $65.83 $67.87 $67.77 $67.04 $67.29 $67.23 $67.24 $67.35 $62.55 $62.67 Additional Connection Charge for Touch-Tone Service 4 1.70 1.89 1.13 1.19 1.17 0.92 0.27 0.17 0.17 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12 a4 a4 a4 a4 a4 a4 Tax, Including 911 Charges 4.06 4.15 4.32 4.33 4.25 4.13 4.17 4.20 4.45 4.13 4.53 4.40 4.69 5.09 6.95 6.42 6.15 6.41 6.06 Total Connection Charge $76.81 $77.40 $78.20 $78.07 $76.83 $74.93 $72.31 $72.85 $73.29 $70.09 $72.55 $72.29 $71.86 $72.39 $74.18 $73.66 $73.50 $68.96 $68.74
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A1.txt
  • - by Study Area ............................. Table 3.31 ILEC High-Cost Loop Support Data - Percentage Changes by State or Jurisdiction Table 3.18 ILEC High-Cost Loop Support Data - Percentage Changes by Study Area ...........Table 3.32 ILEC Loops - by State or Jurisdiction ..................................................... Table 3.20 ILEC Loops - by Study Area ............................................................... Table 3.34 Information for Allocating CLEC Revenues .............................................. Table 1.19 Information for Allocating Incumbent Local Exchange Revenues .....................Table 1.18 Information for Allocating Interstate Access Revenues .................................. Table 1.22 Information for Allocating Interstate Toll ...................................................Table 1.26 Information for Allocating Intrastate Access Revenues .................................. Table 1.23 Information for Allocating LEC Intrastate Toll ............................................ Table 1.24 Information for Allocating Mobile Wireless Revenues .................................. Table 1.20 Information for Allocating Non-LEC Intrastate Toll ......................................Table 1.25
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A2.txt
  • - by Study Area ............................. Table 3.31 ILEC High-Cost Loop Support Data - Percentage Changes by State or Jurisdiction Table 3.18 ILEC High-Cost Loop Support Data - Percentage Changes by Study Area ...........Table 3.32 ILEC Loops - by State or Jurisdiction ..................................................... Table 3.20 ILEC Loops - by Study Area ............................................................... Table 3.34 Information for Allocating CLEC Revenues .............................................. Table 1.19 Information for Allocating Incumbent Local Exchange Revenues .....................Table 1.18 Information for Allocating Interstate Access Revenues .................................. Table 1.22 Information for Allocating Interstate Toll ...................................................Table 1.26 Information for Allocating Intrastate Access Revenues .................................. Table 1.23 Information for Allocating LEC Intrastate Toll ............................................ Table 1.24 Information for Allocating Mobile Wireless Revenues .................................. Table 1.20 Information for Allocating Non-LEC Intrastate Toll ......................................Table 1.25
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A3.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A3.txt
  • revenues for allocation are the product of reported ILECs' local exchange service and miscellaneous revenues and the adjustment formula in Table 1.17. Allocation percentages in each state are the ratio of the state's allocation revenues to nationwide revenues. Local exchange revenues by type are determined by multiplying the allocation factor by the type of revenues (see Table 1.14). In Table 1.19, we allocate interstate and intrastate CLEC revenues on a state-by-state basis by multiplying national revenues (see Table 1.14) by an allocation percentage. The allocation percentage is determined by dividing the number of CLEC lines in a state, as reported in FCC Form 477, by nationwide CLEC lines.32 In Table 1.20, we allocate interstate and intrastate mobile wireless revenues on a
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A5.txt
  • 0.34 0.14 0.14 0.87 Indiana 0.43 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.57 0.44 0.21 1.66 Iowa 1.29 0.11 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.86 0.39 0.82 4.49 Kansas 5.65 0.12 0.02 0.00 0.00 2.99 0.28 0.64 9.71 Kentucky 1.24 0.05 0.00 0.55 0.00 0.98 0.54 0.20 3.57 Louisiana 2.51 0.05 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.15 0.36 0.16 4.23 Maine 0.53 0.04 0.00 0.17 0.00 1.19 0.00 0.58 2.50 Maryland 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.06 0.02 0.10 Massachusetts 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.04 0.02 0.06 Michigan 0.42 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.40 0.01 0.17 1.00 Minnesota 1.37 0.08 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.73 0.11 0.54 3.83 Mississippi 0.98 0.03 0.00 5.73 0.00 0.59 0.66 0.14 8.12 Missouri 1.39 0.04 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.02
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A9.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A9.txt
  • Line Charges PICC 2 2007 Average Monthly Access Lines 3 (Thousands) Company Residential Non-Primary Multiline Multiline Centrex Residential Non-Primary Multiline and Residential Business Business and Residential Business Single-Line and Single-Line and Business Centrex Business Centrex América Móvil $6.50 $6.50 $9.20 $0.00 $0.00 777 2 193 AT&T 5.48 5.30 5.45 0.00 0.00 34,451 4,099 18,699 CenturyTel 4 6.37 6.58 7.55 0.82 1.19 407 17 116 Cincinnati Bell 5.27 5.27 5.27 0.00 0.00 522 36 260 Consolidated 6.50 6.50 9.20 0.00 0.00 148 8 57 Embarq 5.66 5.55 6.95 0.00 0.00 4,349 375 1,502 FairPoint 6.25 6.25 6.25 0.00 0.00 930 72 333 Frontier 6.47 6.95 9.20 4.27 0.79 1,171 57 365 Hawaiian Telecom 6.50 7.00 8.15 0.00 0.00 405 39 94 Iowa
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-301823A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-301823A1.txt
  • Line Charges PICC 2 2007 Average Monthly Access Lines 3 (Thousands) Company Residential Non-Primary Multiline Multiline Centrex Residential Non-Primary Multiline and Residential Business Business and Residential Business Single-Line and Single-Line and Business Centrex Business Centrex América Móvil $6.50 $6.50 $9.20 $0.00 $0.00 777 2 193 AT&T 5.48 5.30 5.45 0.00 0.00 34,451 4,099 18,699 CenturyTel 4 6.37 6.58 7.55 0.82 1.19 407 17 116 Cincinnati Bell 5.27 5.27 5.27 0.00 0.00 522 36 260 Consolidated 6.50 6.50 9.20 0.00 0.00 148 8 57 Embarq 5.66 5.55 6.95 0.00 0.00 4,349 375 1,502 FairPoint 6.25 6.25 6.25 0.00 0.00 930 72 333 Frontier 6.47 6.95 9.20 4.27 0.79 1,171 57 365 Hawaiian Telecom 6.50 7.00 8.15 0.00 0.00 405 39 94 Iowa
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303886A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303886A1.txt
  • 0.44 Maryland 2,792 2.24 854 1.95 4 1.04 5,124 2.00 7,729,202 2.45 Massachusetts 2,609 2.09 1,590 3.63 6 1.55 5,624 2.20 6,513,904 2.06 Michigan 3,719 2.98 1,442 3.29 10 2.39 7,821 3.06 7,930,336 2.51 Minnesota 2,006 1.61 873 1.99 7 1.68 4,164 1.63 4,623,973 1.46 Mississippi 1,018 0.82 182 0.42 4 0.99 2,252 0.88 3,229,711 1.02 Missouri 2,568 2.06 519 1.19 6 1.42 4,835 1.89 6,674,043 2.11 Montana 406 0.33 101 0.23 2 0.40 723 0.28 1,244,348 0.39 Nebraska 606 0.49 298 0.68 2 0.58 1,451 0.57 1,795,825 0.57 Nevada 1,042 0.84 414 0.95 6 1.58 2,249 0.88 3,474,657 1.10 New Hampshire 507 0.41 343 0.78 1 0.26 1,045 0.41 1,648,777 0.52 New Jersey 3,936 3.16 1,925 4.40 9 2.16 7,834
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303886A3.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303886A3.txt
  • 0.44 Maryland 2,792 2.24 854 1.95 4 1.04 5,124 2.00 7,729,202 2.45 Massachusetts 2,609 2.09 1,590 3.63 6 1.55 5,624 2.20 6,513,904 2.06 Michigan 3,719 2.98 1,442 3.29 10 2.39 7,821 3.06 7,930,336 2.51 Minnesota 2,006 1.61 873 1.99 7 1.68 4,164 1.63 4,623,973 1.46 Mississippi 1,018 0.82 182 0.42 4 0.99 2,252 0.88 3,229,711 1.02 Missouri 2,568 2.06 519 1.19 6 1.42 4,835 1.89 6,674,043 2.11 Montana 406 0.33 101 0.23 2 0.40 723 0.28 1,244,348 0.39 Nebraska 606 0.49 298 0.68 2 0.58 1,451 0.57 1,795,825 0.57 Nevada 1,042 0.84 414 0.95 6 1.58 2,249 0.88 3,474,657 1.10 New Hampshire 507 0.41 343 0.78 1 0.26 1,045 0.41 1,648,777 0.52 New Jersey 3,936 3.16 1,925 4.40 9 2.16 7,834
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303886A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303886A5.txt
  • SUMMIT TEL & TEL -AK 4.62 -2.59 7.40 4.47 TOTAL AMERICAN SAMOA -8.03 -1.16 -6.95 0.00 673900 C AMERICAN SAMOA -8.03 -1.16 -6.95 0.00 TOTAL ARIZONA -1.63 -11.12 10.67 1.67 450815 C HOPI TELECOMM, INC. 27.41 2.19 24.68 61.98 452169 C SAN CARLOS APACHE 9.84 -3.85 14.24 13.09 452171 C ARIZONA TELEPHONE CO 6.60 -10.73 19.41 2464.28 452172 C CITZENS-FRNTR-RURAL -1.19 -6.28 5.43 0.00 452173 C TOHONO O'ODHAM UTIL. 3.13 -3.70 7.10 1.90 452174 C SOUTHWESTERN TEL CO -2.52 -8.59 6.64 -11.05 452176 C VALLEY TEL COOP-AZ -5.41 -11.23 6.56 -6.11 452179 C GILA RIVER TELECOM. 7.38 -1.95 9.51 7.96 452191 C ACCIPITER DBA ZONA 8.61 15.36 -5.85 7.59 452200 C FORT MOJAVE TEL, INC -1.42 -4.04 2.73 -5.48 452226 C
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-311775A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-311775A1.txt
  • 0.26 0.13 7.68 7.94 Iowa 7.08 0.00 0.00 7.08 7.08 7.17 0.00 0.00 7.17 7.17 7.09 0.00 0.00 7.09 7.09 Kansas 7.25 3.50 1.75 9.00 12.50 7.05 2.24 1.12 8.17 10.41 7.16 2.93 1.46 8.62 11.55 Kentucky 8.19 3.47 1.74 9.92 13.39 8.55 3.49 1.75 10.30 13.79 8.31 3.48 1.74 10.05 13.53 Louisiana 8.25 0.00 0.00 8.25 8.25 8.30 2.37 1.19 9.49 11.86 8.29 2.16 1.08 9.38 11.54 Maine 7.99 3.50 1.75 9.74 13.24 8.02 3.50 1.75 9.77 13.28 8.00 3.50 1.75 9.75 13.25 Maryland 7.36 3.41 1.71 9.07 12.48 7.40 3.50 1.75 9.15 12.65 7.40 3.49 1.75 9.15 12.64 Massachusetts 8.10 3.50 1.75 9.85 13.35 8.10 3.50 1.75 9.85 13.35 8.10 3.50 1.75 9.85 13.35 Michigan 7.26 2.22 1.11 8.38
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-221A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-221A1.txt
  • Standards Board, Accounting Standard, Accounting Principles Board, Opinion No. 15)). But see Bell Atlantic/GTE May 9, 2000 Reply at 22-23 (contending that the FASB opinion cited by AT&T has been superseded by FASB Statement No. 128, under which options are not regarded as common stock equivalents if contingent upon some future event). 131American Law Institute, Principles of Corporate Governance § 1.19 (1994). 132American Law Institute, Principles of Corporate Governance § 1.20 (1994). 133Bell Atlantic/GTE May 9, 2000 Reply at 28-29 (explaining that equity "equivalents" would include devices that conferred the three participation rights through contract or other instruments that carry the distribution and liquidation rights of equity ownership absent voting, such as partnership interests, debt interests that confer the right to
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-208A2.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-208A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-208A2.txt
  • applied, making it difficult to compare the data over time. AGGREGATE METRICS DISAGGREGATED METRICS Metric January February March April Number Metric Name VZ CLEC VZ CLEC VZ CLEC VZ CLEC Notes Preorder and OSS Interface Availability OSS Response Times PO-1-01 Customer Service Record - EDI 2.75 2.42 2.76 2.37 2.69 2.38 2.70 2.85 PO-1-01 Customer Service Record - CORBA 2.75 1.19 2.76 1.03 2.69 1.08 2.70 1.23 PO-1-01 Customer Service Record - Web GUI 2.75 5.59 2.76 3.50 2.69 1.62 2.70 3.20 PO-1-02 Due Date Availability - EDI 0.12 3.67 0.14 2.62 0.12 2.48 0.13 2.77 PO-1-02 Due Date Availability - CORBA 0.12 1.97 0.14 0.71 0.12 NA 0.13 NA PO-1-02 Due Date Availability - Web GUI 0.12 5.39 0.14 2.47
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-208A3.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-208A3.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-208A3.txt
  • applied, making it difficult to compare the data over time. AGGREGATE METRICS DISAGGREGATED METRICS Metric January February March April Number Metric Name VZ CLEC VZ CLEC VZ CLEC VZ CLEC Notes Preorder and OSS Interface Availability OSS Response Times PO-1-01 Customer Service Record - EDI 2.75 2.42 2.76 2.26 2.69 2.71 2.70 NA PO-1-01 Customer Service Record - CORBA 2.75 1.19 2.76 0.89 2.69 0.97 2.70 1.45 PO-1-01 Customer Service Record - Web GUI 2.75 5.59 2.76 3.29 2.69 NA 2.70 3.21 PO-1-02 Due Date Availability - EDI 0.12 3.67 0.14 NA 0.12 NA 0.13 NA PO-1-02 Due Date Availability - CORBA 0.12 1.97 0.14 NA 0.12 NA 0.13 NA PO-1-02 Due Date Availability - Web GUI 0.12 5.39 0.14 2.17
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-369A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-369A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-369A1.txt
  • Information authorized by U.S. federal, state or local law. 1.16 "MES" means a mobile earth station (i.e., a hand-held, portable or other mobile terminal capable of receiving and/or transmitting Wire Communications or Electronic Communications by satellite). 1.17 "Non U.S.-Licensed MES" means an Inmarsat MES other than a U.S.-Licensed MES. 1.18 "Party" or "Parties" have the meaning given in the Preamble. 1.19 "Pro forma assignments" or "pro forma transfers of control" are transfers or assignments that do not "involve a substantial change in ownership or control" of the licenses as provided in 47 C.F.R. 63.24. 1. 20 "Sensitive Information" means unclassified information regarding (i) the persons or facilities that are the subjects of Lawful U.S. Process, (ii) the identity of the government
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-49A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-49A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-49A1.txt
  • Error ----- 0.77 ----- 0.01 Overall Large 62.3 57.0 $0.50 $0.57 Standard Error 0.81 0.82 0.01 0.01 Medium 57.5 47.8 $0.55 $0.67 Standard Error 1.27 0.89 0.02 0.01 Small ----- 39.6 ----- $0.77 Standard Error ----- 1.08 ----- 0.02 Very Small ----- 24.9 ----- $1.09 Standard Error ----- 1.69 ----- 0.08 Overall Small 40.7 37.1 $0.72 $0.83 Standard Error 1.37 1.19 0.03 0.03 ATTACHMENT B-4 REGRESSION RESULTS SHOWING THE EFFECTS OF COMPETITIVE STATUS, MSO AFFILIATION, SYSTEM SIZE, NUMBER OF CHANNELS, AND HOUSEHOLD INCOME ON AVERAGE MONTHLY RATES VARIABLE COEFFICIENT Low Penetration Dummy -0.0203 (0.0157) LEC Dummy -0.0984 (0.0112) Municipal Dummy -0.3282 (0.0601) Overbuild Dummy -0.0177 (0.0227) DBS Dummy 0.0788 (0.0158) MSO Dummy 0.1498 (0.0355) Reciprocal of Avg. Total Channels -9.7460 (0.8760)
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-156A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-156A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-156A1.txt
  • the market competition capacity of [AACR]''). See Answer, Exhibit 7 (INDOTEL Petition) at 4, § 1.11 (alleging that Tricom S.A. had ``refus[ed] to expand the traffic originating and terminating capacity between both networks, which prevented [AACR] from fulfilling its international correspondent undertakings, and offering its services to customers owning a TRICOM line''). Answer, Exhibit 7 (INDOTEL Petition) at 7, § 1.19 (``calls originating in our network and intended for TRICOM were being blocked by limitations on the capacity attributable solely to TRICOM''). See Answer, Exhibit 7 (INDOTEL Petition) at 8, § 2.1 (AACR was forced to ``request from international companies with whom [it] hold[s] correspondent relations to abstain from sending [AACR] calls intended for TRICOM network [sic], due to the inability
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-330A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-330A1.txt
  • 0.49 0.00 0.72 0.00 0.51 0.00 0.43 0.00 0.28abcde 17 - Percent Troubles in 7 (10) days for New Orders (Non-Specials) 17 - 1790700Resale Res POTS 0.76 0.99 1.35 1.45 1.28 1.87 1.40 1.94 1.42 2.03 17 - 1790800Resale Bus POTS 0.80 1.01 0.86 1.50 0.52 1.96 2.04 1.93 0.86 2.22 17 - 1791100UNE Lp 2/4w 8db and 5.5db 1.54 1.19 2.29 2.92 2.71 2.51 2.40 2.40 2.95 4.63 17 - 1791300UNE Lp 2/4w 8db and 5.5db FDT 0.59 tbd 0.81 tbd 0.88 tbd 1.09 tbd 1.00 tbd 17 - 1791400UNE Lp 2/4w 8db and 5.5db TBCC 0.82 tbd 1.79 tbd 2.55 tbd 2.20 tbd 2.64 tbd 17 - 1791600UNE Plat Basic Port and Loop 0.17 1.01 0.40 1.50 0.41 1.96
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-3A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-3A2.txt
  • such rules may be amended from time to time in accordance with Section 6.2. 1.18 "Test Tools" means devices that (a) utilize the DFAST Technology and have as their purpose the testing or verification of the performance of, or (b) are specifically designed for the purpose of testing or verification of the performance of, Unidirectional Digital Cable Products and Prototypes. 1.19 "Unidirectional Digital Cable Products" means unidirectional ("one-way") digital television products (including without limitation, televisions, set-top-boxes and recording devices) that use the DFAST Technology. Unidirectional Digital Cable Products shall not include interactive ("two-way") digital television products, including, without limitation, products that are capable of obtaining access to video-on-demand or impulse pay-per-view services, of using the return path of the cable system,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-12A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-12A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-12A1.txt
  • Statistic Service Installation: Unwired Residence Service Installation: Pre-Wired Residence Reconnection of Cable Service January 1, 2004 * Sample groups combined Average $45.03 $31.25 $28.60 Observations 641 641 641 Standard error 0.49 0.43 0.40 Noncompetitive group Average $45.19 $31.24 $28.71 Observations 406 406 406 Standard error 0.43 0.36 0.36 Competitive group Average $43.25 $31.47 $27.43 Observations 235 235 235 Standard error 1.19 1.30 0.88 Wireline competition Average $43.00 $31.57 $26.76 Observations 115 115 115 Standard error 1.22 1.31 0.88 Wireline incumbent Average $44.40 $31.16 $26.66 Observations 65 65 65 Standard error 0.71 0.87 0.66 Wireline rival Average $36.79 $33.36 $27.17 Observations 50 50 50 Standard error 3.46 3.28 1.84 DBS competition *** Average $41.20 $32.41 $29.36 Observations 52 52 52 Standard error
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-13A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-13A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-13A1.txt
  • systems, but do not use public rights-of-way. PCOs focus principally on serving small numbers of subscribers living in multiple dwelling units (MDUs) and other private communities. As of June 2003, there were about 1.2 million subscribers to PCO services, representing 1.34 percent of all MVPD subscribers. As of June 2004, there were about 1.1 million subscribers to PCO services, representing 1.19 percent of the total number of MVPD households, a decline since our last Report. Internet Video: Over the past year, video provided over the Internet has grown and promises to become an increasingly strong product in the market for the delivery of video programming. Most instances of video streamed over the web, however, are still not of broadcast quality, and
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-167A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-167A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-167A1.txt
  • of any of the above information pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 2703(f); and (f) access to, or acquisition or interception of, or preservation of communications or information as described in (a) through (e) above and comparable state laws. 1.17. ``FBI'' means the Federal Bureau of Investigation. 1.18. ``Foreign'' where used in this Agreement, whether capitalized or lower case, means non-U.S. 1.19. ``GC'' means Guam Cellular and Paging, Inc. 1.20. ``Governmental Authority'' or ``Governmental Authorities'' means any government, or any governmental, administrative, or regulatory entity, authority, commission, board, agency, instrumentality, bureau, or political subdivision, and any court, tribunal, judicial, or arbitral body. 1.21. ``Intercept'' or ``Intercepted'' has the meaning defined in 18 U.S.C. § 2510(4). 1.22. ``Lawful U.S. Process'' means lawful U.S.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-43A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-43A1.txt
  • means any Person who is not a U.S. Person as provided by 31 C.F.R. § 800.222. 1.18. "Hosting Services" means Web hosting (whether shared or dedicated, and including design, server management, maintenance and telecommunications services), Web site traffic management, electronic commerce, streamed media services, server collocation and management, application hosting, and all other similar services offered by the Domestic Companies. 1.19. "Identifying Information" means the name, address, telephone number, e-mail address, I.P. address, or any other information that is customarily used to identify a particular end user. 1.20. "Intercept" or "Intercepted" has the meaning defined in 18 U.S.C. § 2510(4). 1.21. "Lawful U.S. Process" means lawful U.S. federal, state, or local court orders, subpoenas, warrants, processes, or authorizations issued under U.S.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-90A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-90A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-90A1.txt
  • Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture, 15 Rcd 16999 (2000); US Notary, Inc., Forfeiture Order, 16 FCC Rcd 18398 (2001); Tri-Star Marketing, Inc., Notice of Apparent Liability For Forfeiture, 15 FCC Rcd 11295 (2000); Tri-Star Marketing, Inc., Forfeiture Order, 15 FCC Rcd 23198 (2000). See 47 U.S.C. § 503(b)(4)(C); 47 C.F.R. § 1.80(f)(3). 47 C.F.R. § 1.80. 47 C.F.R. § 1.19. (...continued from previous page) (continued....) Federal Communications Commission FCC 08-90 Federal Communications Commission FCC 08-90 F F F F F  ' Ç Ç *0 Ç *0 „¶ ¶ ^„¶ „ ^„
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-198A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-198A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-198A1.txt
  • radiated or conducted), or the circumstances under which the transmitter operates in accordance with Commission rules, can be altered by making a change in software without making any changes to hardware components that affect the radio frequency emissions.'' See 47 C.F.R. § 2.1. Draft Conference Preparatory Meeting Report from the Director, Radiocommunication Bureau, ITU, CPM11-2/1-E, dated August 13, 2010, Section 6/1.19/3, p. 410. . . The Forum has worked in collaboration with the Institute of Electrical and Electronic Engineers P1900.1 group to establish a definition of software-defined radio that provides consistency and a clear overview of that technology and its associated benefits. Capabilities include exploiting locally vacant or unused radio channels, or ranges of radio spectrum, to provide new paths to
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-161A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-161A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-161A1.txt
  • 0.0 544 0.117* 0.171** 0.186*** 0.222 (6.11) (3.57) (2.60) (2.42) (1.74) (2.86) (2.91) (0.68) (2.30) (3.05) ( 4.33) (1.69) Land_Area_uc 0.00647 0.0223 -0.0051 -0.0614 -0.216 -0.0178 0.0292 0.145 -0.0146 -0.109 -0.104 -0.297 (0.10) (0.21) (-0.02) (-0.22) (-1.41) (-0.12) (0.15) (0.72) (-0.13) (-0 .86) (-0.71) (-0.98) Land_Area_ua -0.101 0.137 0.596 0.265 -0.0041 -0.289* 0.0983 0.219 0.169 0.482 -0.384** -0.467 (-1.49) (0.72) (1.19) (0.48) (-0.02) (-2.33) (0.24) (0.68) (1.36) (1.86 ) (-2.59) (-0.95) Percent_Water 0.866*** -0.0712 -0.434 -1.103 0.299 -0.244 0.808 1.731* 0.577 -0.821 - 0.246 -0.0843 (3.31) (-0.19) (-0.36) (-0.91) (0.38) (-0.54) (0.86) (2.53) (1.03) (-1. 37) (-0.31) (-0.05) Census_Blocs_nu 0.134* 0.200* 0.228 0.297 0.0559 0.113 -0.129 0.135 0.17 6 0.0630 0.0840 -0.259 (2.44) (2.37) (1.27) (1.53) (0.58) (1.05) (-0.77) (0.87) (1.69)
• http://http.fcc.gov/ftp/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Databases/documents_collection/annual_reports/images/1928_spectrum_chart/1928_spectrum_chart.html
  • Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit 404 Not Found File not found. __________________________________________________________________ [1]mini_httpd/1.19 19dec2003 References 1. http://www.acme.com/software/mini_httpd/
• http://konan.fcc.gov/eb/News_Releases/nrosi.html
  • Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit 404 Not Found File not found. __________________________________________________________________ [1]mini_httpd/1.19 19dec2003 References 1. http://www.acme.com/software/mini_httpd/
• http://konan.fcc.gov/eb/News_Releases/nrverizon.html
  • Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit 404 Not Found File not found. __________________________________________________________________ [1]mini_httpd/1.19 19dec2003 References 1. http://www.acme.com/software/mini_httpd/
• http://test.fcc.gov/broadband/Welcome.html
  • Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit 404 Not Found File not found. __________________________________________________________________ [1]mini_httpd/1.19 19dec2003 References 1. http://www.acme.com/software/mini_httpd/
• http://test.fcc.gov/bureaus/wcb/tapd/universal_service/Archives/ruralhealthcareappeals.html
  • Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit 404 Not Found File not found. __________________________________________________________________ [1]mini_httpd/1.19 19dec2003 References 1. http://www.acme.com/software/mini_httpd/
• http://test.fcc.gov/form477/broadband-reporting.html
  • Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit 404 Not Found File not found. __________________________________________________________________ [1]mini_httpd/1.19 19dec2003 References 1. http://www.acme.com/software/mini_httpd/
• http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireline_Competition/Orders/2002/fcc02118.pdf
  • Days ­ FOK/TOK/CPE ­ Loop 3.13 1.92 2.73 2.29 2.53 2.16 2.14 2.15 Federal Communications Commission FCC 02-118 C-26 Metric Metric September October November December January Notes Number Full Name VZ CLE C VZ CLE C VZ CLE C VZ CLE C VZ CLE C PR-6-03-3121 % Installation Troubles reported within 30 Days ­ FOK/TOK/CPE ­ Platform 3.13 0.87 2.73 1.19 2.53 0.82 1.16 0.88 PR-8 ­ Open Orders in a Hold Status PR-8-01-3100 Open Orders in a Hold Status > 30 Days 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PR-8-02-3100 Open Orders in a Hold Status > 90 Days 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PR-9- Hot Cuts PR-9-01-3520 % On Time Performance
• http://transition.fcc.gov/Reports/fcc2008budget_complete.pdf
  • Commission. The various conference agenda items have been initially assigned to the informal working groups as follows: Informal Working Groups (IWG) Agenda Items (Major WRC-07 Issues) IWG-1 ­ Terrestrial and Space Science Services 1.2, 1.3, 1.5, 1.14, 1.16, & 1.20 IWG-2 ­ Satellite Services including those related to High Altitude Platform Stations (HAPS) 1.6 (Resolution 415), 1.7, 1.8, 1.17, 1.18, 1.19, & 1.21) IWG-3 ­ International Mobile Telephone (IMT-2000) & 2.5 GHz 1.4 & 1.9 IWG-4 ­ Broadcasting and Amateur Services 1.6 (Resolution 414), 1.11, 1.13, 1.15, & 7.1 (Recommendation 952) IWG-5 ­ Regulatory Issues 1.1, 1.0, 1.12, 2, 3, 5, 6, & 7.1) MEDIA At the end of FY 2006, a total of 1,586 of 1,687 licensed DTV stations (94%)
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2002/FCC-02-156A1.html
  • ``increasing the market competition capacity of [AACR]''). See Answer, Exhibit 7 (INDOTEL Petition) at 4, 1.11 (alleging that Tricom S.A. had ``refus[ed] to expand the traffic originating and terminating capacity between both networks, which prevented [AACR] from fulfilling its international correspondent undertakings, and offering its services to customers owning a TRICOM line''). 50 Answer, Exhibit 7 (INDOTEL Petition) at 7, 1.19 (``calls originating in our network and intended for TRICOM were being blocked by limitations on the capacity attributable solely to TRICOM''). See Answer, Exhibit 7 (INDOTEL Petition) at 8, 2.1 (AACR was forced to ``request from international companies with whom [it] hold[s] correspondent relations to abstain from sending [AACR] calls intended for TRICOM network [sic], due to the inability to
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2008/FCC-08-90A1.html
  • Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture, 15 Rcd 16999 (2000); US Notary, Inc., Forfeiture Order, 16 FCC Rcd 18398 (2001); Tri-Star Marketing, Inc., Notice of Apparent Liability For Forfeiture, 15 FCC Rcd 11295 (2000); Tri-Star Marketing, Inc., Forfeiture Order, 15 FCC Rcd 23198 (2000). See 47 U.S.C. S: 503(b)(4)(C); 47 C.F.R. S: 1.80(f)(3). 47 C.F.R. S: 1.80. 47 C.F.R. S: 1.19. (...continued from previous page) (continued....) Federal Communications Commission FCC 08-90 1 2 Federal Communications Commission FCC 08-90 References 1. http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-90A1.pdf 2. http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-90A1.doc
• http://transition.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/FCC-99-55A1.doc http://transition.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/FCC-99-55A1.pdf
  • be treated as prima facie inconsistent with the public interest and must include a public interest justification. We will consider Reynolds' proposal to permit alternative signal propagation methodologies to measure NCE FM service levels in a subsequent order in this proceeding in connection with our evaluation of the supplemental point-to-point ("PTP") signal propagation model. III. PROCEDURAL MATTERS AND ORDERING CLAUSES 1.19 Effective Date. The new procedures we are adopting will become effective 30 days after the date of publication of this Order in the Federal Register. We believe that this 30-day period will provide adequate notice and opportunity to potential applicants, while expediting the benefits to the public of the new procedures. 1.20 In order to ensure a smooth transition to
• http://transition.fcc.gov/ownership/materials/already-released/consumer090002.pdf
  • CL HITS 83 1.31 EZ/SAC 3 0.05 E 14 0.22 FS 202 3.69 EZ 13 0.21 FS/T 41 0.75 EZ/SAC 1 0.02 G 55 1 FS 96 1.52 G/B 1 0.02 FS/T 81 1.28 Jazz (J) 59 1.08 G 62 0.98 News (N) 37 0.68 J 118 1.87 News/Talk (N/T) 161 2.94 KIDS 1 0.02 NAC/AOR 2 0.04 N 75 1.19 O 352 6.43 N/T 170 2.69 Religious (REL) 200 3.65 O 394 6.24 Soft Adult Contemp. (SAC) 379 6.92 REL 276 4.37 SP 172 3.14 SAC 253 4.01 Sports (SPRTS) 70 1.28 SP 296 4.69 Talk 247 4.51 SPRTS 172 2.72 T/O 4 0.07 T 408 6.46 Unknown 360 6.57 T/CL AOR 7 0.11 T/J 5 0.08 UNK 6 0.1
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/23/charts/23press2.pdf
  • 25 33 31 $57,642,000.00 $40,739,500.00 50 1.48 1 17.52 26 28 27 $58,697,000.00 $41,353,000.00 47 1.41 1 13.20 27 15 15 $59,604,000.00 $41,253,050.00 45 1.40 1 7.44 28 8 8 $59,982,000.00 $41,588,550.00 45 1.39 1 3.44 29 19 19 $60,146,000.00 $40,974,100.00 43 1.35 1 14.11 30 17 17 $60,624,000.00 $42,081,250.00 43 1.23 2 7.10 31 18 18 $61,782,000.00 $42,504,850.00 41 1.19 2 8.40 32 13 13 $62,489,000.00 $43,727,700.00 41 1.17 2 5.41 33 9 9 $62,960,000.00 $43,719,000.00 40 1.16 2 5.04 34 7 7 $63,386,000.00 $44,065,500.00 40 1.15 2 4.08 35 13 12 $63,847,000.00 $44,296,100.00 40 1.08 3 5.04 36 6 6 $64,203,000.00 $44,491,900.00 40 1.06 3 2.72 37 3 3 $64,447,000.00 $44,626,100.00 40 1.04 3 1.44 38 4 4 $64,782,000.00
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/default.htm?job=conference_papers&y=2001
  • Response to Prof. Milgrom and Prof. Ausubel's Comments on the Second Wye River Package Bidding Conference Kevin Leyton-Brown 1/25/2002 [51]pdf (136 KB) Comments on the Second Wye River Package Bidding Conference Paul Milgrom and Larry Ausubel 12/14/2001 [52]pdf (92 KB) Theory, Experiment, and Federal Communication Commission Spectrum Auctions Jeffrey Banks, Mark Olson, David Porter, Stephen Rassenti and Vernon Smith [53]pdf (1.19 MB) CABOB: A Fast Optimal Algorithm for Combinatorial Auctions, International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI), Seattle, WA (pages 1102-1108) Sandholm, T., Suri, S., Gilpin, A., and Levine, D. [54]pdf (208 KB) Side Constraints and Non-Price Attributes in Markets, International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI), Workshop on Distributed Constraint Reasoning, Seattle, WA, August 4th (pages 55-61) Sandholm, T. and
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/rss/index.htm?job=ainf&id=70
  • with PWBs*: 104 FCC Held Permits: 16 Eligible Bidders: 70 (of 114 qualified bidders) * PWBs = Provisionally Winning Bidders http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/default.htm?job=auction_summary&id=70W ed, 14 Mar 2007 18:35:02 GMT Summary Permits: 120 construction permits in the FM broadcast service Qualified Bidders: 114 Rounds Completed: 24 Bidding Days: 6 Results for Round 24 Gross Revenue: $20,439,500.00 - Dollar Change: $239,800.00 - % Change: 1.19 Net Revenue: $17,438,110.00 - Dollar Change: ($30,590.00) - % Change: - 0.18 New Bids: 34 Withdrawn Bids: 0 Proactive Waivers: 1 Bidders that Reduced Eligibility: 2 Permits with PWBs*: 105 FCC Held Permits: 15 Eligible Bidders: 68 (of 114 qualified bidders) * PWBs = Provisionally Winning Bidders http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/default.htm?job=auction_summary&id=70W ed, 14 Mar 2007 19:50:01 GMT Summary Permits: 120 construction permits in
• http://www.fcc.gov.e-file/ecfs.html
  • Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit 404 Not Found File not found. __________________________________________________________________ [1]mini_httpd/1.19 19dec2003 References 1. http://www.acme.com/software/mini_httpd/
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Fiber/fiber98.pdf
  • 28,406 58% NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA Pacific Telesis 23,843 75% 145,753 264 193,583 6,608 6,113 11.1 8.1 0.28 3.3% SBC 20,343 68% NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA U S WEST 23,356 58% NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA GTE 21,252 74% 172,232 752 736,617 25,216 8,104 35.4 34.7 1.19 3.3% Total reported: 191,626 68% * See accompanying notes to the tables and discussion in text. See accompanying notes to the tables and discussion in text. ** Total Switched and Special Access Lines from ARMIS 43-08 data. Total switched and special access lines from ARMIS 43-08 data. Notes to Tables 5-13: Blank entries are used to denote years in which
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref02.pdf
  • 1990-2001...........................................26 Table 1.16 Connection Charges for Three Key-System Business Lines in the Sample Cities (As of October 15), 1990-2001...........................................28 iii Table 1.17 Average Local Rates for Businesses with a PBX Trunk in Urban Areas (As of October 15, 2001)..........30 Table 1.18 Average Local Rates for a Business with a PBX Trunk in Urban Areas (As of October 15), 1989-2001.........31 Table 1.19 Monthly Telephone Rates in the Sample Cities for a Business with a PBX Trunk (As of October 15), 1990-2001...........................................32 Table 1.20 Connection Charges for Three PBX Trunks in the Sample Cities (As of October 15), 1990-2001.....................34 B. Toll Service Rates...........................................................................................................36 Table 1.21 Basic Schedule Rates of AT&T, WorldCom, and Sprint for Residential Customers for a 10-Minute Day Call...........................37 Table 1.22
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref03.pdf
  • 1990-2002 ii Table 1.16 Connection Charges for Three Key-System Business Lines in the Sample Cities (As of October 15), 1990-2002 Table 1.17 Average Local Rates for Businesses with a PBX Trunk in Urban Areas (As of October 15, 2002) Table 1.18 Average Local Rates for a Business with a PBX Trunk in Urban Areas (As of October 15), 1989-2002 Table 1.19 Monthly Telephone Rates in the Sample Cities for a Business with a PBX Trunk (As of October 15), 1990-2002 Table 1.20 Connection Charges for Three PBX Trunks in the Sample Cities (As of October 15), 1999 -2002 Table 1.21 Basic Schedule Rates of AT&T, WorldCom, and Sprint for Residential Customers for a 10-Minute Day, Evening, and Night Call Table 1.22
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref04.pdf
  • Number of Sample Cities with Measured/Message Service 83 83 84 84 84 87 87 86 85 85 85 85 85 86 85 Cost of a Five-Minute, Business-Day, Same-Zone Call $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 Basic Connection Charge $71.05$71.36$72.75$72.55$71.41$69.88$67.87$68.47$68.67 $65.83$67.87$67.77$67.04$67.29 $67.26 Additional Connection Charge for Touch-Tone Service 4 1.70 1.89 1.13 1.19 1.17 0.92 0.27 0.17 0.17 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12 a4 a4 Tax, Including 911 Charges 4.06 4.15 4.32 4.33 4.25 4.13 4.17 4.20 4.45 4.13 4.53 4.40 4.69 5.09 5.36 Total Connection Charge $76.81$77.40$78.20$78.07$76.83$74.93$72.31$72.85$73.29 $70.09$72.55$72.29$71.86$72.39 $72.62 Additional Charge if Drop Line and Connection Block Needed $5.92 $7.87 $6.90 $6.83 $6.64 $6.49 $7.28 $6.98 $6.54 $6.54 $6.65 $6.62 $6.62 $6.52 $6.52
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref05.pdf
  • Measured/Message Service 83 83 84 84 84 87 87 86 85 85 85 85 85 86 85 85 Cost of a Five-Minute, Business-Day, Same-Zone Cal $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.10 Basic Connection Charge $71.05$71.36$72.75$72.55$71.41$69.88$67.87$68.47$68.67 $65.83$67.87 $67.77 $67.04 $67.29$67.23 $67.24 Additional Connection Charge for Touch-Tone Service 4 1.70 1.89 1.13 1.19 1.17 0.92 0.27 0.17 0.17 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12 a4 a4 a4 Tax, Including 911 Charges 4.06 4.15 4.32 4.33 4.25 4.13 4.17 4.20 4.45 4.13 4.53 4.40 4.69 5.09 6.95 6.93 Total Connection Charge $76.81$77.40$78.20$78.07$76.83$74.93$72.31$72.85$73.29 $70.09$72.55 $72.29 $71.86 $72.39$74.18 $74.17 Additional Charge if Drop Line and Connection Block Needed $5.92 $7.87 $6.90 $6.83 $6.64 $6.49 $7.28 $6.98 $6.54 $6.54
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref97.pdf
  • 1.22 0.98 Tax including 911 charges 4.41 4.53 4.56 4.77 4.86 4.83 5.00 Total monthly charge 42.72 42.83 43.44 43.82 44.26 43.72 43.71 Additional local five-minute call 0.093 0.093 0.091 0.093 0.094 0.092 0.091 Inside wiring maintenance 1.78 1.91 2.05 2.03 2.08 2.26 2.39 Rotary connection charge 71.05 71.36 72.75 72.55 71.41 69.88 67.87 Extra for Touch-tone 1.70 1.89 1.13 1.19 1.17 0.92 0.27 Tax 4.06 4.15 4.32 4.33 4.25 4.13 4.18 Total charge 76.81 77.40 78.20 78.07 76.83 74.93 72.32 Additional charge if drop line and connection block are needed 5.92 7.87 6.90 6.83 6.64 6.49 7.28 Some previous estimates have been revised. 5 Rate based on unlimited service where available, and measured service with 200 same-zone 6 local calls
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref98.pdf
  • in the Sample Cities for a Business with a Key System Line, 1990-1997...26 Table 1.16 Connection Charges in the Sample Cities for Three Key System Business Lines, 1990-1997..28 Table 1.17 Average Local Rates for a Business with a PBX Trunk as of October 15, 1997............30 Table 1.18 Average Local Rates for a Business with a PBX Trunk, 1989-1997...................31 iii Table 1.19 Monthly Rates in the Sample Cities for a Business with a PBX Trunk, 1990-1997........32 Table 1.20 Connection Charges in the Sample Cities for Three PBX Trunks, 1990-1997...............34 B. Rates in Rural Areas.........................................36 Table 1.21 Average Monthly Rates of RUS Borrowers by State, 1996...................37 Table 1.22 Average Monthly Rates of RUS Borrowers, 1994-1996.....................38 Table 1.23 Average Monthly Rates of RUS Borrowers
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref99.pdf
  • in the Sample Cities for a Business with a Key System Line, 1990-1998...26 Table 1.16 Connection Charges in the Sample Cities for Three Key System Business Lines, 1990-1998..28 Table 1.17 Average Local Rates for a Business with a PBX Trunk as of October 15, 1998..........30 Table 1.18 Average Local Rates for a Business with a PBX Trunk, 1989-1998..................31 ii Table 1.19 Monthly Rates in the Sample Cities for a Business with a PBX Trunk, 1990-1998.......32 Table 1.20 Connection Charges in the Sample Cities for Three PBX Trunks, 1990-1998..............34 B. Rates in Rural Areas.....................................36 Table 1.21 Average Monthly Rates of RUS Borrowers by State, 1997.................37 Table 1.22 Average Monthly Rates of RUS Borrowers, 1994-1997....................38 Table 1.23 Average Monthly Rates of RUS Borrowers
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ror96.pdf
  • 11.94 17.07 18.15 (119.15) 5.01 14.04 64ELKHART TELEPHONE COMPANY 25.08 12.00 (4.71) 35.87 - 31.66 34.97 65FIDELITY TELEPHONE COMPANY 11.16 9.59 45.71 (4.90) - 44.53 66BOURBEUSE TELEPHONE COMPANY 17.57 12.05 96.71 28.57 - - 28.57 67GREAT PLAINS COMMUNICATIONS, INC. 13.82 13.34 7.08 - - - - 68GTE ALASKA 12.53 11.94 3.14 14.70 - 18.37 14.85 69GTE CALIFORNIA INCORPORATED 8.75 11.97 (1.19) 10.68 (48.76) 0.43 6.58 RATE OF RETURN DATA JANUARY 1, 1987 - DECEMBER 31, 1987 REPORTS FILED MARCH 31, 1988 SWITCHED TRAFFIC SENSITIVE COMMONSPECIAL END LOCAL NO. NAME OF COMPANY INTERSTATE LINE ACCESS OFFICE INFORMATIONTRANSPORT TOTAL 70GTE FLORIDA INCORPORATED 12.07 11.97 14.98 12.37 (10.84) 9.80 11.54 71GTE NORTH INCORPORATED - ILLINOIS 11.06 11.95 3.47 11.65 (78.36) 10.71 11.14 72GTE NORTH
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/strev-95.pdf
  • Access LInes Adustment Formula as a % of Total Access Lines in Industry 100/%Reporting SOCC, 2.3 ALABAMA 91.52 1.09 ARIZONA 93.77 1.07 ARKANSAS 76.63 1.30 CALIFORNIA 98.48 1.02 COLORADO 95.70 1.04 CONNECTICUT 99.02 1.01 DELAWARE 100.00 1.00 DC 100.00 1.00 FLORIDA 98.47 1.02 GEORGIA 84.96 1.18 HAWAII 100.00 1.00 IDAHO 92.55 1.08 ILLINOIS 97.43 1.03 INDIANA 95.62 1.05 IOWA 83.83 1.19 KANSAS 84.00 1.19 KENTUCKY 76.44 1.31 LOUISIANA 92.83 1.08 MAINE 83.80 1.19 MARYLAND 99.81 1.00 MASSACHUSETTS 99.91 1.00 MICHIGAN 96.70 1.03 MINNESOTA 75.47 1.33 MISSISSIPPI 93.75 1.07 MISSOURI 93.36 1.07 MONTANA 69.54 1.44 NEBRASKA 87.24 1.15 NEVADA 31.46 3.18 NEW HAMPSHIRE 93.98 1.06 NEW JERSEY 99.85 1.00 NEW MEXICO 90.92 1.10 NEW YORK 96.82 1.03 NORTH CAROLINA 83.60 1.20 NORTH
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/strev-96.pdf
  • 0.41 (2,381) (0.18) NEW HAMPSHIRE 2,494 0.27 3,917 0.42 (1,423) (0.15) NEW JERSEY 2,048 0.03 30,058 0.42 (28,010) (0.40) NEW MEXICO 19,107 1.85 4,236 0.41 14,870 1.44 NEW YORK 9,633 0.07 60,164 0.41 (50,532) (0.34) NORTH CAROLINA 21,475 0.40 21,681 0.41 (206) (0.00) NORTH DAKOTA 6,458 1.37 1,843 0.39 4,615 0.98 OHIO 4,625 0.06 32,405 0.42 (27,781) (0.36) OKLAHOMA 26,637 1.19 9,485 0.42 17,152 0.76 OREGON 18,151 0.79 9,612 0.42 8,538 0.37 PENNSYLVANIA 1,426 0.02 37,047 0.40 (35,621) (0.39) RHODE ISLAND 0 0.00 3,134 0.42 (3,134) (0.42) SOUTH CAROLINA 22,924 0.94 10,209 0.42 12,714 0.52 SOUTH DAKOTA 3,991 0.84 2,004 0.42 1,987 0.42 TENNESSEE 7,573 0.20 15,984 0.42 (8,411) (0.22) TEXAS 73,166 0.54 55,565 0.41 17,601 0.13 UTAH 2,875 0.23 5,123
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/strev-97.pdf
  • 1998 ARE ANNUALIZED BASED ON THE FIRST EIGHT MONTHS OF 1998. 19 Table 7 All High Cost and Low Income Support Mechanisms: 1998 Annual Annual Annual Payments Monthly Monthly Monthly Payments Payments Contributions Less Payments Contributions Less (Thousands) (Thousands) Contributions Per Loop Per Loop Contributions (Thousands) Per Loop ALABAMA $40,351 $29,436 $10,915 $1.40 $1.02 $0.38 ALASKA 63,427 5,663 57,764 13.30 1.19 12.11 ARIZONA 32,273 43,017 (10,743) 0.98 1.31 (0.33) ARKANSAS 71,422 17,794 53,627 4.35 1.08 3.27 CALIFORNIA 321,535 206,432 115,103 1.25 0.80 0.45 COLORADO 47,709 43,307 4,402 1.50 1.37 0.14 CONNECTICUT 5,029 35,604 (30,575) 0.19 1.38 (1.18) DELAWARE 20 8,398 (8,379) 0.00 1.32 (1.31) DIST. OF COLUMBIA 0 11,656 (11,656) 0.00 1.06 (1.06) FLORIDA 31,833 142,655 (110,822) 0.25 1.13 (0.88) GEORGIA
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/strev-99.pdf
  • 0.28 8,216 1.27 Nebraska 3,861 0.32 2,990 0.25 871 0.07 Nevada 916 0.06 4,287 0.27 -3,371 -0.21 New Hampshire 1,512 0.14 3,059 0.29 -1,547 -0.15 New Jersey 0 0.00 19,696 0.24 -19,696 -0.24 New Mexico 6,160 0.54 3,203 0.28 2,957 0.26 New York 6,806 0.04 34,079 0.22 -27,273 -0.18 North Carolina 12,053 0.20 13,960 0.23 -1,907 -0.03 North Dakota 5,982 1.19 1,317 0.26 4,665 0.93 Ohio 5,213 0.06 16,325 0.19 -11,111 -0.13 Oklahoma 16,412 0.66 5,229 0.21 11,184 0.45 Oregon 9,254 0.36 6,197 0.24 3,057 0.12 Pennsylvania 14,137 0.14 19,727 0.19 -5,590 -0.06 Rhode Island 0 0.00 2,107 0.26 -2,107 -0.26 South Carolina 11,098 0.40 6,861 0.25 4,238 0.15 South Dakota 5,040 0.98 1,462 0.28 3,578 0.69 Tennessee 10,393 0.25 9,185
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend100.pdf
  • 3.52 2.48 2.39 1.87 1.73 1.68 1.22 0.98 0.83 0.39 0.33 0.25 4.41 4.53 4.56 4.77 4.86 4.83 5.01 5.13 5.22 5.19 5.27 42.72 42.83 43.44 43.82 44.26 43.72 43.75 43.84 43.57 43.35 43.22 83 83 84 84 84 87 87 86 85 85 85 $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $71.05$71.36$72.75$72.55$71.41$69.88$67.87$68.47$68.67$65.83$67.87 1.70 1.89 1.13 1.19 1.17 0.92 0.27 0.17 0.17 0.12 0.12 4.06 4.15 4.32 4.33 4.25 4.13 4.17 4.20 4.45 4.13 4.49 76.81 77.40 78.20 78.07 76.83 74.93 72.31 72.85 73.29 70.09 72.48 5.92 7.87 6.90 6.83 6.64 6.49 7.28 6.98 6.54 6.54 6.65 $1.78 $1.91 $2.05 $2.03 $2.08 $2.26 $2.39 $2.63 $2.84 $3.04 $3.51 TABLE 14.3 AVERAGE MONTHLY LOCAL RATES OF RUS BORROWERS
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend199.pdf
  • 43.75 43.84 43.57 43.354 Number of Sample Cities with Measured/Message Service 83 83 84 84 84 87 87 86 85 85 Cost of a Five-minute Business-day Same-zone Call $0.0929 $0.0933 $0.0912 $0.0931 $0.0942 $0.0923 $0.0925 $0.0923 $0.0921 $0.0918 Basic Connection Charge $71.05 $71.36 $72.75 $72.55 $71.41 $69.88 $67.87 $68.47 $68.67 $65.83 Additional Connection Charge for Touch-tone Service 1.70 1.89 1.13 1.19 1.17 0.92 0.27 0.17 0.17 0.12 Tax 4.06 4.15 4.32 4.33 4.25 4.13 4.17 4.20 4.45 4.13 Total Connection Charge 76.81 77.40 78.20 78.07 76.83 74.93 72.31 72.85 73.29 70.09 Additional Charge if Drop Line and Connection Block Needed 5.92 7.87 6.90 6.83 6.64 6.49 7.28 6.98 6.54 6.54 Lowest-cost Inside Wiring Maintenance Plan $1.78 $1.91 $2.05 $2.03 $2.08 $2.26
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend200.pdf
  • 0.33 0.25 4.41 4.53 4.56 4.77 4.86 4.83 5.01 5.13 5.22 5.19 5.27 42.72 42.83 43.44 43.82 44.26 43.72 43.75 43.84 43.57 43.35 43.22 83 83 84 84 84 87 87 86 85 85 85 $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $71.05 $71.36 $72.75 $72.55 $71.41 $69.88 $67.87 $68.47 $68.67 $65.83 $67.87 1.70 1.89 1.13 1.19 1.17 0.92 0.27 0.17 0.17 0.12 0.12 4.06 4.15 4.32 4.33 4.25 4.13 4.17 4.20 4.45 4.13 4.49 76.81 77.40 78.20 78.07 76.83 74.93 72.31 72.85 73.29 70.09 72.48 5.92 7.87 6.90 6.83 6.64 6.49 7.28 6.98 6.54 6.54 6.65 $1.78 $1.91 $2.05 $2.03 $2.08 $2.26 $2.39 $2.63 $2.84 $3.04 $3.51 Table 14.3 Average Monthly Local Rates of RUS Borrowers
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend298.pdf
  • 45,484 73,846 NYNEX 1.26 0.00 1.44 0.26 4.85 18,536 36,892 56,308 Pacific Telesis 0.03 0.00 0.72 0.36 2.24 12,977 26,034 39,054 SBC 0.00 0.00 0.96 0.29 2.57 15,773 25,814 42,030 U S WEST 0.56 0.00 1.02 0.65 4.01 21,351 34,436 55,908 GTE 2.00 1.15 0.92 0.19 5.57 18,388 29,819 48,834 Aliant 0.06 0.00 1.52 0.32 3.85 258 426 688 Frontier 1.19 0.26 1.29 0.36 4.93 735 1,659 2,396 SNET 0.34 0.00 1.29 0.28 3.60 3,178 5,095 8,276 Sprint Local 1.29 0.61 1.06 0.22 4.62 8,213 12,767 21,110 Citizens 2.64 1.57 1.85 0.42 9.06 1,077 1,431 2,520 Cincinnati Bell 0.55 0.00 0.85 0.17 2.69 1,111 1,799 2,912 All Price Caps 0.91 0.15 0.92 0.30 3.64 171,209 300,879 474,868 NECA 1.00 1.18 3.57
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend299.pdf
  • 4.83 5.01 5.13 5.22 5.19 Total Monthly Charge for Measured/Message Service 42.72 42.83 43.44 43.82 44.26 43.72 43.75 43.84 43.57 43.35 Number of Sample Cities with Measured/Message Service 83 83 84 84 84 87 87 86 85 85 Cost of a Five-minute Business-day Same-zone Call $0.0929$0.0933$0.0912$0.0931$0.0942$0.0923$0.0925$0.0923$0.0921$0.0918 Basic Connection Charge $71.05$71.36$72.75$72.55 $71.41$69.88$67.87$68.47$68.67$65.83 Additional Connection Charge for Touch-tone Service 1.70 1.89 1.13 1.19 1.17 0.92 0.27 0.17 0.17 0.12 Tax 4.06 4.15 4.32 4.33 4.25 4.13 4.17 4.20 4.45 4.13 Total Connection Charge 76.81 77.40 78.20 78.07 76.83 74.93 72.31 72.85 73.29 70.09 Additional Charge if Drop Line and Connection Block Needed 5.92 7.87 6.90 6.83 6.64 6.49 7.28 6.98 6.54 6.54 Lowest-cost Inside Wiring Maintenance Plan $1.78 $1.91 $2.05 $2.03 $2.08 $2.26
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend502.pdf
  • Measured/Message Service 83 83 84 84 84 87 87 86 85 85 85 85 85 Cost of a Five-Minute Same-Zone Business-Day Call $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.10 $0.09 Basic Connection Charge $71.05 $71.36 $72.75 $72.55 $71.41 $69.88 $67.87 $68.47 $68.67 $65.83 $67.87 $67.77 $67.84 Additional Connection Charge for Touch-Tone Service 1.70 1.89 1.13 1.19 1.17 0.92 0.27 0.17 0.17 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12 Taxes, Including 911 Charges 4.06 4.15 4.32 4.33 4.25 4.13 4.17 4.20 4.45 4.13 4.53 4.40 4.42 Total Connection Charge $76.81 $77.40 $78.20 $78.07 $76.83 $74.93 $72.31 $72.85 $73.29 $70.09 $72.55 $72.29 $72.38 Additional Charge if Drop Line and Connection Block Needed $5.92 $7.87 $6.90 $6.83 $6.64 $6.49 $7.28 $6.98 $6.54
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend504.pdf
  • 83 84 84 84 87 87 86 85 85 85 85 85 86 Cost of a Five-Minute Same-Zone Business-Day Call $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.10 $0.09 $0.09 Basic Connection Charge $71.05 $71.36 $72.75 $72.55 $71.41 $69.88 $67.87 $68.47 $68.67 $65.83 $67.87 $67.77 $67.04 $67.25 Additional Connection Charge for Touch-Tone Service 1.70 1.89 1.13 1.19 1.17 0.92 0.27 0.17 0.17 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12 Taxes, Including 911 Charges 4.06 4.15 4.32 4.33 4.25 4.13 4.17 4.20 4.45 4.13 4.53 4.40 4.69 4.97 Total Connection Charge $76.81 $77.40 $78.20 $78.07 $76.83 $74.93 $72.31 $72.85 $73.29 $70.09 $72.55 $72.29 $71.86 $72.35 Additional Charge if Drop Line and Connection Block Needed $5.92 $7.87 $6.90 $6.83 $6.64 $6.49
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend605.pdf
  • 85 85 85 85 85 86 85 85 Cost of a Five-Minute Same-Zone Business-Day Call $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.10 $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.10 Basic Connection Charge $71.05 $71.36 $72.75 $72.55 $71.41 $69.88 $67.87 $68.47 $68.67 $65.83 $67.87 $67.77 $67.04 $67.29 $67.23 $67.24 Additional Connection Charge for Touch-Tone Service 4 1.70 1.89 1.13 1.19 1.17 0.92 0.27 0.17 0.17 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12 4 4 4 Taxes, Including 911 Charges 4.06 4.15 4.32 4.33 4.25 4.13 4.17 4.20 4.45 4.13 4.53 4.40 4.69 5.09 6.95 6.93 Total Connection Charge $76.81 $77.40 $78.20 $78.07 $76.83 $74.93 $72.31 $72.85 $73.29 $70.09 $72.55 $72.29 $71.86 $72.39 $74.18 $74.17 Additional Charge if Drop Line and Connection Block Needed
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend801.pdf
  • Sample Cities with Measured/Message Service 83 83 84 84 84 87 87 86 85 85 85 85 Cost of a Five-Minute Business-Day Same-Zone Call $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.10 Basic Connection Charge $71.05 $71.36 $72.75 $72.55 $71.41 $69.88 $67.87 $68.47 $68.67 $65.83 $67.87 $67.77 Additional Connection Charge for Touch-Tone Service 1.70 1.89 1.13 1.19 1.17 0.92 0.27 0.17 0.17 0.12 0.12 0.12 Tax 4.06 4.15 4.32 4.33 4.25 4.13 4.17 4.20 4.45 4.13 4.53 4.40 Total Connection Charge $76.81 $77.40 $78.20 $78.07 $76.83 $74.93 $72.31 $72.85 $73.29 $70.09 $72.55 $72.29 Additional Charge if Drop Line and Connection Block Needed $5.92 $7.87 $6.90 $6.83 $6.64 $6.49 $7.28 $6.98 $6.54 $6.54 $6.65 $6.62 Lowest-Cost Inside Wiring
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend803.pdf
  • 83 84 84 84 87 87 86 85 85 85 85 85 86 Cost of a Five-Minute Same-Zone Business-Day Call $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.10 $0.09 $0.09 Basic Connection Charge $71.05 $71.36 $72.75 $72.55 $71.41 $69.88 $67.87 $68.47 $68.67 $65.83 $67.87 $67.77 $67.04 $67.25 Additional Connection Charge for Touch-Tone Service 1.70 1.89 1.13 1.19 1.17 0.92 0.27 0.17 0.17 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12 Taxes, Including 911 Charges 4.06 4.15 4.32 4.33 4.25 4.13 4.17 4.20 4.45 4.13 4.53 4.40 4.69 4.97 Total Connection Charge $76.81 $77.40 $78.20 $78.07 $76.83 $74.93 $72.31 $72.85 $73.29 $70.09 $72.55 $72.29 $71.86 $72.35 Additional Charge if Drop Line and Connection Block Needed $5.92 $7.87 $6.90 $6.83 $6.64 $6.49
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Intl/itltrd98.pdf
  • 2/ 32 100 48 53 19 30 3.10 1.47 1.63 1.59 1.61 1967 2/ 40 114 55 60 23 32 2.88 1.38 1.50 1.36 1.45 1968 46 127 62 65 28 40 2.73 1.33 1.41 1.42 1.41 1969 65 172 83 89 38 52 2.66 1.28 1.38 1.35 1.37 1970 81 197 99 98 51 60 2.43 1.22 1.21 1.17 1.19 1971 101 237 121 117 68 75 2.35 1.20 1.16 1.10 1.13 1972 127 292 148 144 92 99 2.31 1.17 1.14 1.08 1.11 1973 159 365 184 180 112 120 2.29 1.16 1.13 1.08 1.11 1974 191 429 217 212 142 152 2.25 1.14 1.11 1.07 1.09 1975 219 490 247 243 167 177 2.23 1.13 1.11 1.06 1.09
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Intl/itltrd99.pdf
  • 2/ 32 100 48 53 19 30 3.10 1.47 1.63 1.59 1.61 1967 2/ 40 114 55 60 23 32 2.88 1.38 1.50 1.36 1.45 1968 46 127 62 65 28 40 2.73 1.33 1.41 1.42 1.41 1969 65 172 83 89 38 52 2.66 1.28 1.38 1.35 1.37 1970 81 197 99 98 51 60 2.43 1.22 1.21 1.17 1.19 1971 101 237 121 117 68 75 2.35 1.20 1.16 1.10 1.13 1972 127 292 148 144 92 99 2.31 1.17 1.14 1.08 1.11 1973 159 365 184 180 112 120 2.29 1.16 1.13 1.08 1.11 1974 191 429 217 212 142 152 2.25 1.14 1.11 1.07 1.09 1975 219 490 247 243 167 177 2.23 1.13 1.11 1.06 1.09
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Intl/itrnd00.pdf
  • 1.61 1966 32.3 100.1 47.6 52.5 18.9 30.1 3.10 1.47 1.63 1.59 1.61 1967 39.7 114.2 54.6 59.6 23.4 31.8 2.88 1.38 1.50 1.36 1.45 1968 46.4 126.9 61.5 65.4 28.2 40.0 2.73 1.33 1.41 1.42 1.41 1969 64.6 172.0 82.7 89.4 38.3 51.6 2.66 1.28 1.38 1.35 1.37 1970 81.1 196.6 98.9 97.7 51.0 59.8 2.43 1.22 1.21 1.17 1.19 1971 100.9 237.4 120.7 116.6 68.4 75.1 2.35 1.20 1.16 1.10 1.13 1972 126.5 291.8 148.2 143.6 91.7 98.6 2.31 1.17 1.14 1.08 1.11 1973 159.3 364.9 184.4 180.5 111.5 120.2 2.29 1.16 1.13 1.08 1.11 1974 190.7 428.7 216.6 212.1 142.0 152.2 2.25 1.14 1.11 1.07 1.09 1975 219.4 490.2 247.4 242.9 167.0 176.9 2.23 1.13 1.11 1.06 1.09
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Intl/itrnd01.pdf
  • 1.61 1966 32.3 100.1 47.6 52.5 18.9 30.1 3.10 1.47 1.63 1.59 1.61 1967 39.7 114.2 54.6 59.6 23.4 31.8 2.88 1.38 1.50 1.36 1.45 1968 46.4 126.9 61.5 65.4 28.2 40.0 2.73 1.33 1.41 1.42 1.41 1969 64.6 172.0 82.7 89.4 38.3 51.6 2.66 1.28 1.38 1.35 1.37 1970 81.1 196.6 98.9 97.7 51.0 59.8 2.43 1.22 1.21 1.17 1.19 1971 100.9 237.4 120.7 116.6 68.4 75.1 2.35 1.20 1.16 1.10 1.13 1972 126.5 291.8 148.2 143.6 91.7 98.6 2.31 1.17 1.14 1.08 1.11 1973 159.3 364.9 184.4 180.5 111.5 120.2 2.29 1.16 1.13 1.08 1.11 1974 190.7 428.7 216.6 212.1 142.0 152.2 2.25 1.14 1.11 1.07 1.09 1975 219.4 490.2 247.4 242.9 167.0 176.9 2.23 1.13 1.11 1.06 1.09
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr03-1.pdf
  • revenues for allocation are the product of reported ILECs' local exchange service and miscellaneous revenues and the adjustment formula in Table 1.17. Allocation percentages in each state are the ratio of the state's allocation revenues to nationwide revenues. Local exchange revenues by type are determined by multiplying the allocation factor by the type of revenues. (See Table 1.14). In Table 1.19, we allocate interstate and intrastate CLEC revenues on a state-by-state basis by multiplying national revenues (See Table 1.14) by an allocation percentage. For those states with publicly available data on CLEC lines that exceed 100,000, the allocation percentage is determined by dividing the number of CLEC lines as reported in FCC Form 477 by nationwide CLEC lines.25 It is more
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr03-3.pdf
  • 12.37 22.44 472233 C RURAL TELEPHONE COMPANY - ID 21.79 1.24 20.30 30.59 472234 C TROY TELEPHONE COMPANY 0.60 2.65 -2.00 -19.26 472295 C SILVER STAR TEL. CO. INC.-ID 37.11 6.68 28.53 52.61 472416 C VERIZON NORTHWEST INC.-ID 1.64 -0.92 2.58 -6.03 472423 C INLAND TELEPHONE COMPANY - ID 5.11 1.98 3.07 4.75 474427 C CITIZENS TELECOMMUNICATIONS COMPANY OF IDAHO -1.19 -0.81 -0.39 -5.96 475103 C QWEST CORPORATION - ID 3.75 -0.72 4.50 0.00 475162 C QWEST CORPORATION - IDAHO -10.60 -5.05 -5.85 -100.00 TOTAL: ILLINOIS -1.64 -2.42 0.80 24.24 340976 A ADAMS TEL. COOP. 5.49 -0.34 5.85 10.60 340978 C ALHAMBRA-GRANTFORK TEL. CO. 2.88 2.32 0.55 -10.37 340983 A CAMBRIDGE TEL. CO.-IL 11.29 -1.62 13.12 91.32 340984 C CASS TELEPHONE
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr03-7.pdf
  • 43.35 43.35 44.45 45.57 46.40 Number of Sample Cities with Measured/Message Service 83 83 84 84 84 87 87 86 85 85 85 85 85 86 Cost of a Five-Minute Business-Day Same-Zone Call $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.10 $0.09 $0.09 Basic Connection Charge $71.05$71.36$72.75$72.55$71.41$69.88$67.87$68.47$68.67$65.83$67.87$67.77$67.04$67.25 Additional Connection Charge for Touch-Tone Service 1.70 1.89 1.13 1.19 1.17 0.92 0.27 0.17 0.17 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12 Taxes 4.06 4.15 4.32 4.33 4.25 4.13 4.17 4.20 4.45 4.13 4.53 4.40 4.69 4.97 Total Connection Charge 76.81 77.40 78.20 78.07 76.83 74.93 72.31 72.85 73.29 70.09 72.55 72.29 71.86 72.35 Additional Charge If Drop Line and Connection Block Needed $5.92 $7.87 $6.90 $6.83 $6.64 $6.49 $7.28 $6.98 $6.54
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr03-intro.pdf
  • ................................. Table 3.1 High-Cost Support - Non-Rural by Study Area ........................................... Table 3.25 High-Cost Support Payment Projections - Total by Jurisdiction ...................... Table 3.15 High-Cost Support Payment Projections - Total by Study Area ........................Table 3.30 High-Cost Support Mechanisms ­ Payments per Loop by State ....................... Table 3.16 Income - Net ........................................................................................................... Table 11.5 Information for Allocating CLEC Revenues .............................................. Table 1.19 Information for Allocating Incumbent Local Exchange Revenues .....................Table 1.18 Information for Allocating Interstate Access Revenues .................................. Table 1.22 Information for Allocating Interstate Toll Revenues ...................................... Table 1.26 Information for Allocating Intrastate Access Revenues .................................. Table 1.23 Information for Allocating LEC Intrastate Toll Revenues ............................... Table 1.24 Information for Allocating Mobile Wireless Revenues .................................. Table 1.20 Information for Allocating Non-LEC Intrastate
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr04-1.pdf
  • revenues for allocation are the product of reported ILECs' local exchange service and miscellaneous revenues and the adjustment formula in Table 1.17. Allocation percentages in each state are the ratio of the state's allocation revenues to nationwide revenues. Local exchange revenues by type are determined by multiplying the allocation factor by the type of revenues (see Table 1.14). In Table 1.19, we allocate interstate and intrastate CLEC revenues on a state-by-state basis by multiplying national revenues (see Table 1.14) by an allocation percentage. For those states with publicly available data on CLEC lines that exceed 100,000, the allocation percentage is determined by dividing the number of CLEC lines as reported in FCC Form 477 by nationwide CLEC lines.26 It is more
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr04-3.pdf
  • Loop Later Year* ILLINOIS Cont. 341021 A THE GRANDVIEW MUTUAL TEL. CO. -22.37 -22.56 0.24 -27.04 341023 C GRIDLEY TEL. CO. -16.86 -0.07 -16.81 0.00 341024 A HAMILTON COUNTY TELEPHONE CO-OP 2.42 -1.64 4.13 2.28 341025 C SHAWNEE TEL. CO. -2.66 -0.92 -1.75 -17.27 341026 C HARRISONVILLE TEL. CO. -6.68 -0.06 -6.62 -30.19 341029 A HENRY COUNTY TEL. CO. 8.56 -1.19 9.86 39.05 341032 C HOME TEL. CO.-ST. JACOB 7.79 -3.39 11.57 9.94 341036 C VERIZON NORTH INC.-IL (CONTEL) 1.21 -2.60 3.90 0.00 341037 C ILLINOIS CONSOLIDATED TEL. CO. 14.58 -3.50 18.73 799.23 341038 C FRONTIER COMM. OF ILLINOIS, INC. -16.37 3.74 -19.38 -100.00 341041 A KINSMAN MUTUAL TEL. CO. 0.22 1.87 -1.62 -8.45 341043 C LA HARPE TEL. CO. -2.29
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr04-7.pdf
  • 45.57 44.61 44.60 Number of Sample Cities with Measured/Message Service 83 83 84 84 84 87 87 86 85 85 85 85 85 86 85 Cost of a Five-Minute Business-Day Same-Zone Call $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.10 $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 Basic Connection Charge $71.05$71.36$72.75$72.55$71.41$69.88$67.87$68.47$68.67$65.83$67.87$67.77$67.04$67.29$67.26 Additional Connection Charge for Touch-Tone Service**** 1.70 1.89 1.13 1.19 1.17 0.92 0.27 0.17 0.17 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12 **** **** Taxes 4.06 4.15 4.32 4.33 4.25 4.13 4.17 4.20 4.45 4.13 4.53 4.40 4.69 5.09 5.36 Total Connection Charge 76.81 77.40 78.20 78.07 76.83 74.93 72.31 72.85 73.29 70.09 72.55 72.29 71.86 72.39 72.62 Additional Charge If Drop Line and Connection Block Needed $5.92 $7.87 $6.90 $6.83 $6.64 $6.49
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr04-intro.pdf
  • Total by State or Jurisdiction ............. Table 3.13 High-Cost Support Payment Projections - Total by State - ILECs and CLECs ..... Table 3.14 High-Cost Support Payment Projections - Total by Study Area ........................Table 3.29 High-Cost Support Mechanisms ­ Monthly Support per Loop by State .............. Table 3.15 Income - Net ........................................................................................................... Table 11.5 Information for Allocating CLEC Revenues .............................................. Table 1.19 Information for Allocating Incumbent Local Exchange Revenues .....................Table 1.18 Information for Allocating Interstate Access Revenues .................................. Table 1.22 Information for Allocating Interstate Toll ...................................................Table 1.26 Information for Allocating Intrastate Access Revenues .................................. Table 1.23 Information for Allocating LEC Intrastate Toll ............................................ Table 1.24 Information for Allocating Mobile Wireless Revenues .................................. Table 1.20 Information for Allocating Non-LEC Intrastate Toll ......................................Table 1.25
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr98-7.pdf
  • for Touch-tone 2.48 2.39 1.87 1.73 1.68 1.22 0.98 0.83 0.45 Tax including 911 Charges 4.41 4.53 4.56 4.77 4.86 4.83 5.01 5.13 5.20 Total Monthly Charge for Measured/Message Service 42.72 42.83 43.44 43.82 44.26 43.72 43.75 43.84 43.58 Cost of a Five-minute Business-day Same-zone Call $0.0929$0.0933$0.0912$0.0931$0.0942$0.0923$0.0925$0.0923$0.0921 Basic Connection Charge $71.05$71.36$72.75$72.55$71.41$69.88$67.87$68.47$68.58 Additional Connection Charge for Touch-tone Service 1.70 1.89 1.13 1.19 1.17 0.92 0.27 0.17 0.17 Tax 4.06 4.15 4.32 4.33 4.25 4.13 4.17 4.2 4.42 Total Connection Charge 76.81 77.40 78.20 78.07 76.83 74.93 72.31 72.85 73.18 Additional Charge if Drop Line and Connection Block Needed 5.92 7.87 6.90 6.83 6.64 6.49 7.28 6.98 6.86 Lowest-cost Inside Wiring Maintenance Plan $1.78 $1.91 $2.05 $2.03 $2.08 $2.26 $2.39 $2.63 $2.76 *Rate
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrd99-7.pdf
  • 1.35 1953 21 22 26.7 1.27 1.34 1954 22 22 26.9 1.35 1.33 1955 23 22 26.8 1.40 1.34 1956 23 22 27.2 1.40 1.32 1957 24 22 28.1 1.38 1.28 1958 24 22 28.9 1.35 1.24 1959 24 22 29.1 1.35 1.23 1960 24 22 29.6 1.33 1.21 1961 25 22 29.9 1.36 1.20 1962 25 22 30.2 1.36 1.19 1963 25 22 30.6 1.32 1.17 1964 25 22 31.0 1.31 1.16 1965 24 22 31.5 1.24 1.14 1966 24 22 32.4 1.22 1.11 1967 24 22 33.4 1.18 1.07 1968 24 22 34.8 1.11 1.03 1969 24 22 36.7 1.07 0.98 * Estimates for 1930 through 1981 are based on information in AT&T Long Lines Statistics, 1930-1963; 1946-1970, and
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrj99-7.pdf
  • 43.75 43.84 43.57 43.35 Number of Sample Cities with Measured/Message Service 83 83 84 84 84 87 87 86 85 85 Cost of a Five-minute Business-day Same-zone Call 9.29¢ 9.33¢ 9.12¢ 9.31¢ 9.42¢ 9.23¢ 9.25¢ 9.23¢ 9.21¢ 9.18¢ Basic Connection Charge $71.05 $71.36 $72.75 $72.55 $71.41 $69.88 $67.87 $68.47 $68.67 $65.83 Additional Connection Charge for Touch-tone Service 1.70 1.89 1.13 1.19 1.17 0.92 0.27 0.17 0.17 0.12 Other Mandatory Payments 4.06 4.15 4.32 4.33 4.25 4.13 4.17 4.20 4.45 4.13 Total Connection Charge 76.81 77.40 78.20 78.07 76.83 74.93 72.31 72.85 73.29 70.09 Additional Charge if Drop Line and Connection Block Needed 5.92 7.87 6.90 6.83 6.64 6.49 7.28 6.98 6.54 6.54 Lowest-cost Inside Wiring Maintenance Plan $1.78 $1.91 $2.05 $2.03
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrs00-0.pdf
  • 42.72 42.83 43.44 43.82 44.26 43.72 43.75 43.84 43.57 43.35 43.22 Number of Sample Cities with Measured/Message Service 83 83 84 84 84 87 87 86 85 85 85 Cost of a Five-minute Business-day Same-zone Call $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 Basic Connection Charge $71.05$71.36$72.75$72.55$71.41$69.88$67.87$68.47$68.67$65.83$67.87 Additional Connection Charge for Touch-tone Service 1.70 1.89 1.13 1.19 1.17 0.92 0.27 0.17 0.17 0.12 0.12 Tax 4.06 4.15 4.32 4.33 4.25 4.13 4.17 4.20 4.45 4.13 4.49 Total Connection Charge 76.81 77.40 78.20 78.07 76.83 74.93 72.31 72.85 73.29 70.09 72.48 Additional Charge if Drop Line and Connection Block Needed $5.92 $7.87 $6.90 $6.83 $6.64 $6.49 $7.28 $6.98 $6.54 $6.54 $6.65 Lowest-cost Inside Wiring Maintenance Plan $1.78 $1.91
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrs01-0.pdf
  • A HENRY COUNTY TEL. CO. 8.22 3.35 4.71 41.17 341032 C HOME TEL. CO.-ST. JACOB 11.36 1.38 9.85 14.95 341036 C GTE NORTH, INC. - IL (CONTEL) -4.71 3.10 -7.58 0.00 341037 C ILLINOIS CONS. TEL. CO. 2.39 2.00 0.39 0.00 341038 C FRONTIER COMM. OF ILLINOIS, INC. 8.21 0.38 7.80 260.21 341041 A KINSMAN MUTUAL TEL. CO. -0.26 0.94 -1.19 -4.99 341043 C LA HARPE TEL. CO. 16.24 0.99 15.10 26.57 341045 C LEAF RIVER TEL. CO. -8.99 -0.48 -8.55 -19.50 341046 A LEONORE MUTUAL TEL. CO. 0.57 3.25 -2.60 -9.50 341047 A MCDONOUGH TEL. COOP., INC. 13.40 0.98 12.30 76.47 341048 C MCNABB TEL. CO. 6.65 0.84 5.76 16.03 341049 C MADISON TEL. CO. 15.61 1.69 13.69 21.78 341050
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrs02-0.pdf
  • High-Cost Support Payment Projections - Non-Rural by Study Area .............. Table 3.30 High-Cost Support Payment Projections - Total by Jurisdiction ...................... Table 3.13 High-Cost Support Payment Projections - Total by Study Area ....................... Table 3.31 High-Cost Support Mechanisms ­ Net Dollar Flow by State ......................... Table 3.19 Income - Net ........................................................................................................... Table 11.5 Information for Allocating CLEC Revenues .............................................. Table 1.19 Information for Allocating Incumbent Local Exchange Revenues .....................Table 1.18 Information for Allocating Interstate Access Revenues .................................. Table 1.22 Information for Allocating Interstate Toll Revenues ...................................... Table 1.26 Information for Allocating Intrastate Access Revenues .................................. Table 1.23 Information for Allocating LEC Intrastate Toll Revenues ............................... Table 1.24 Information for Allocating Mobile Wireless Revenues .................................. Table 1.20 Information for Allocating Non-LEC Intrastate
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/SOCC/00socc.pdf
  • 13.1 4.45 1.26 1.79 7.51 5.6UT Vermont 14.5 9.2 5.3 1.2 4.1 0.58 0.03 0.05 0.66 3.4VT Virginia 384.7 224.3 160.5 98.3 62.2 10.56 18.68 5.01 34.25 28.0VA Washington 277.4 181.5 95.9 76.1 19.8 2.78 0.31 (0.04) 3.06 16.7WA West Virginia 44.9 20.3 24.6 14.6 10.0 2.16 1.78 0.62 4.56 5.4WV Wisconsin 123.2 88.5 34.7 23.7 11.0 0.66 0.26 0.27 1.19 9.8WI Wyoming 12.1 6.7 5.4 3.6 1.8 0.72 (0.16) (0.19) 0.37 1.5WY Puerto Rico 108.7 104.0 4.6 (7.5) 12.1 (8.17) (3.12) (0.35) (11.64) 23.8PR Unclassified See notes following Table 2.19. 134 Statistics of Communications Common Carriers Table 2.14 - Total Operating Expenses of Reporting Incumbent Local Exchange Carriers for the Year Ended December 31, 2000 (Dollar Amounts Shown in Millions)
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/SOCC/01socc.pdf
  • 5.19 5.28 5.32 5.32 Total Monthly Charge for Measured/Message Service $43.44 $43.82 $44.26 $43.72 $43.75 $43.84 $43.57 $43.35 $43.35 $44.45 $44.93 Cost of a Five-Minute Business-Day Same-Zone Call $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.10 $0.09 Basic Connection Charge $72.75 $72.55 $71.41 $69.88 $67.87 $68.47 $68.67 $65.83 $67.87 $67.77 $67.84 Additional Connection Charge for Touch-Tone Service 1.13 1.19 1.17 0.92 0.27 0.17 0.17 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12 Tax 4.32 4.33 4.25 4.13 4.17 4.2 4.45 4.13 4.53 4.4 4.42 Total Connection Charge $78.20 $78.07 $76.83 $74.93 $72.31 $72.85 $73.29 $70.09 $72.55 $72.29 $72.38 Additional Charge if Drop Line and Connection Block Needed $6.90 $6.83 $6.64 $6.49 $7.28 $6.98 $6.54 $6.54 $6.65 $6.62 $6.62 Lowest-Cost Inside Wiring Maintenance Plan
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/SOCC/02socc.pdf
  • $43.35 $44.45 $45.57 $46.40 Number of Sample Cities with Measured/Message Service 84 84 87 87 86 85 85 85 85 85 86 Cost of a Five-Minute Same-Zone Business-Day Call $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.10 $0.09 $0.09 Basic Connection Charge $72.55 $71.41 $69.88 $67.87 $68.47 $68.67 $65.83 $67.87 $67.77 $67.04 $67.25 Additional Connection Charge for Touch-Tone Service 1.19 1.17 0.92 0.27 0.17 0.17 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12 Taxes, Including 911 Charges 4.33 4.25 4.13 4.17 4.20 4.45 4.13 4.53 4.40 4.69 4.97 Total Connection Charge $78.07 $76.83 $74.93 $72.31 $72.85 $73.29 $70.09 $72.55 $72.29 $71.86 $72.35 Additional Charge if Drop Line and Connection Block Needed $6.83 $6.64 $6.49 $7.28 $6.98 $6.54 $6.54 $6.65 $6.62 $6.62 $6.63 Lowest-Cost
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/SOCC/95socc.pdf
  • INITIAL MINUTE EACH ADDITIONAL MINUTE ALL DAYS STANDARD DISCOUNT ECONOMY STANDARD DISCOUNT ECONOMY 8AM-6PM 6PM-MIDN MIDN-8AM 8AM-6PM 6PM-MIDN MIDN-8AM ARGENTINA INTERNATIONAL DIAL $2.22 $1.47 $1.22 $1.97 $1.30 $1.09 ALL OTHER* 3.60 2.75 2.24 1.97 1.30 1.14 2PM-8PM 8PM-3AM 3AM-2PM 2PM-8PM 8PM-3AM 3AM-2PM AUSTRALIA (INCLUDING TASMANIA) INTERNATIONAL DIAL 1.93 1.26 1.10 1.71 1.12 0.99 ALL OTHER* 3.19 2.57 1.79 1.48 1.29 1.19 7AM-1PM 1PM-6PM 6PM-7AM 7AM-1PM 1PM-6PM 6PM-7AM AUSTRIA INTERNATIONAL DIAL 1.59 1.18 1.07 1.44 1.07 0.98 ALL OTHER* 2.08 1.54 1.32 1.46 1.09 0.99 8AM-5PM 5PM-11PM 11PM-8AM 8AM-5PM 5PM-11PM 11PM-8AM BAHAMAS INTERNATIONAL DIAL 1.28 0.92 0.84 1.14 0.84 0.76 ALL OTHER* 1.30 1.09 0.99 1.19 1.05 0.99 7AM-1PM 1PM-6PM 6PM-7AM 7AM-1PM 1PM-6PM 6PM-7AM BELGIUM INTERNATIONAL DIAL 1.84 1.17 1.03 1.65 1.04
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/SOCC/96socc.pdf
  • (0.53) 2.6 DE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA 158.5 72.3 86.2 57.1 29.1 4.56 7.38 14.06 26.00 3.1 DC FLORIDA 744.1 317.5 426.6 375.7 50.9 2.03 (1.00) 1.01 2.04 48.9 FL GEORGIA 200.2 100.8 99.4 91.4 8.0 (2.81) (0.44) (0.53) (3.78) 11.8 GA HAWAII 126.3 74.1 52.2 46.3 5.9 0.93 (0.01) 0.35 1.27 4.6 HI IDAHO 11.9 17.8 (5.8) (5.5) (0.3) (2.23) (1.19) (0.72) (4.15) 3.8 ID ILLINOIS 412.5 289.4 123.1 99.9 23.2 (3.40) 0.64 0.58 (2.18) 25.4 IL INDIANA 224.9 161.9 63.1 47.1 16.0 1.59 0.79 0.82 3.21 12.8 IN IOWA 19.3 28.8 (9.6) (8.2) (1.4) (2.92) (1.99) (1.87) (6.78) 5.4 IA KANSAS 68.5 57.4 11.1 5.7 5.4 0.01 0.09 0.14 0.24 5.2 KS KENTUCKY 98.3 42.1 56.2 49.2 7.0 1.04 0.17
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/SOCC/97socc.pdf
  • 1.62 3.09 1.08 2.06 2.34 4.49 1.40 2.69 0.94 1.80 2.05 3.90 1.23 2.34 0.82 1.56 1984 18/ 2.53 4.83 1.52 2.90 1.01 1.93 2.18 4.18 1.31 2.51 0.87 1.67 1.94 3.69 1.16 2.21 0.78 1.48 1985 19/ 2.33 4.43 1.40 2.66 0.93 1.77 2.07 3.97 1.24 2.38 0.83 1.59 1.83 3.48 1.10 2.09 0.73 1.39 1986 20/ 1.99 3.79 1.19 2.27 0.88 1.67 1.79 3.44 1.07 2.06 0.79 1.51 1.55 2.95 0.93 1.77 0.68 1.30 1987 21/ 1.58 3.08 0.98 1.91 0.74 1.45 1.50 2.95 0.93 1.83 0.71 1.39 1.23 2.38 0.76 1.48 0.58 1.12 1988 22/ 1.40 2.75 0.91 1.79 0.70 1.38 1.34 2.64 0.87 1.72 0.67 1.32 1.11 2.16 0.72 1.40 0.56 1.08 1989 23/ 1.25 2.50 0.84
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/SOCC/98SOCC.PDF
  • 62.4 0.09 1.20 2.02 3.32 59.1 UT VERMONT 64.0 38.2 25.8 18.4 7.4 0.83 0.30 0.54 1.67 5.7 VT VIRGINIA 20.9 6.6 14.3 10.0 4.3 0.43 0.13 0.15 0.71 3.6 VA WASHINGTON 374.5 229.1 145.4 97.6 47.8 5.82 0.88 2.73 9.43 38.4WA WEST VIRGINIA 247.0 166.6 80.4 69.5 10.8 (2.09) (1.58) (0.61) (4.28) 15.1WV WISCONSIN 40.8 18.7 22.2 12.2 10.0 1.19 0.36 0.40 1.95 8.0 WI WYOMING 120.3 87.6 32.7 21.5 11.2 0.28 0.13 0.18 0.60 10.6WY PUERTO RICO 4.3 5.2 (0.9) (0.9) (0.1) (1.00) (0.34) (0.21) (1.56) 1.5 PR UNCLASSIFIED SEE NOTES FOLLOWING TABLE 2.20 170 STATISTICS OF COMMUNICATIONS COMMON CARRIERS TABLE 2.14 - TOTAL OPERATING EXPENSES OF REPORTING LOCAL EXCHANGE CARRIERS FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1998 (
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/SOCC/99socc.pdf
  • 2.02 (0.37) 0.81 2.45 16.2 IN Iowa 48.7 41.0 7.7 5.1 2.6 (1.59) (0.75) (0.95) (3.29) 5.9 IA Kansas 174.9 75.3 99.6 94.9 4.8 (0.74) (0.03) (0.00) (0.78) 5.5KS Kentucky 135.1 73.8 61.3 49.3 12.0 1.17 0.39 1.55 10.4KY Louisiana 145.4 68.5 76.9 68.5 8.4 (0.21) (0.07) 0.19 (0.10) 8.5 LA Maine 40.7 11.0 29.8 22.0 7.8 0.86 0.06 0.27 1.19 6.6ME Maryland 233.4 113.5 119.9 70.4 49.5 7.24 6.60 5.98 19.82 29.7MD Massachusetts 182.8 104.3 78.5 27.1 51.4 6.32 2.87 5.97 15.16 36.3MA Michigan 272.4 217.0 55.4 37.1 18.3 (0.55) (0.16) 0.21 (0.49) 18.8 MI Minnesota 106.8 67.4 39.4 27.9 11.4 1.14 0.29 0.52 1.95 9.5MN Mississippi 60.2 29.8 30.3 22.7 7.7 0.27 0.11 0.13 0.51 7.2MS Missouri 364.3 273.2
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/SOCC/prelim02socc.pdf
  • $43.35 $44.45 $45.57 $46.40 Number of Sample Cities with Measured/Message Service 84 84 87 87 86 85 85 85 85 85 86 Cost of a Five-Minute Same-Zone Business-Day Call $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.10 $0.09 $0.09 Basic Connection Charge $72.55 $71.41 $69.88 $67.87 $68.47 $68.67 $65.83 $67.87 $67.77 $67.04 $67.25 Additional Connection Charge for Touch-Tone Service 1.19 1.17 0.92 0.27 0.17 0.17 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12 Taxes, Including 911 Charges 4.33 4.25 4.13 4.17 4.20 4.45 4.13 4.53 4.40 4.69 4.97 Total Connection Charge $78.07 $76.83 $74.93 $72.31 $72.85 $73.29 $70.09 $72.55 $72.29 $71.86 $72.35 Additional Charge if Drop Line and Connection Block Needed $6.83 $6.64 $6.49 $7.28 $6.98 $6.54 $6.54 $6.65 $6.62 $6.62 $6.63 Lowest-Cost
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/scard97.pdf
  • 109 (3) American Telecommunications, Inc. 69 American Telesource International, Inc. 4.83 70 15 (4) American Telnet, Inc. 79 AMNEX, Inc. 6.70 785 117 (5) AT&T Corp. 0.10 3,999 39,264 (6) Atlas Communications 1.69 184 109 (3) Billing Information Concepts, Inc. 3.80 4,935 1,300 (4) (10) Brittan Communications Inc. 2.29 250 109 (3) Cherry Communications 0.32 112 354 (6) Cleartel Communications 1.19 130 109 (3) Coastal Telephone Company 77 Colorado River Communications 86 Combined Companies, Inc. 59 Communication TeleSystems 2.32 454 196 (6) ConQuest Operator Service 63 Corporate Services 0.93 101 109 (3) Crown Communications 1.35 147 109 (3) Local Telephone Companies of the following holding companies 30 COMMON CARRIER SCORECARD REPORT E-Tel 1.09 119 109 (3) Eastern Telecommunications, Inc. 1.56 170
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Miscellaneous/News_Releases/2001/nrmc0124.html http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Miscellaneous/News_Releases/2001/nrmc0124.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Miscellaneous/News_Releases/2001/nrmc0124.txt
  • Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit 404 Not Found File not found. __________________________________________________________________ [1]mini_httpd/1.19 19dec2003 References 1. http://www.acme.com/software/mini_httpd/
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireline_Competition/Orders/2002/fcc02118.pdf
  • Days ­ FOK/TOK/CPE ­ Loop 3.13 1.92 2.73 2.29 2.53 2.16 2.14 2.15 Federal Communications Commission FCC 02-118 C-26 Metric Metric September October November December January Notes Number Full Name VZ CLE C VZ CLE C VZ CLE C VZ CLE C VZ CLE C PR-6-03-3121 % Installation Troubles reported within 30 Days ­ FOK/TOK/CPE ­ Platform 3.13 0.87 2.73 1.19 2.53 0.82 1.16 0.88 PR-8 ­ Open Orders in a Hold Status PR-8-01-3100 Open Orders in a Hold Status > 30 Days 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PR-8-02-3100 Open Orders in a Hold Status > 90 Days 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PR-9- Hot Cuts PR-9-01-3520 % On Time Performance
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2002/FCC-02-156A1.html
  • ``increasing the market competition capacity of [AACR]''). See Answer, Exhibit 7 (INDOTEL Petition) at 4, 1.11 (alleging that Tricom S.A. had ``refus[ed] to expand the traffic originating and terminating capacity between both networks, which prevented [AACR] from fulfilling its international correspondent undertakings, and offering its services to customers owning a TRICOM line''). 50 Answer, Exhibit 7 (INDOTEL Petition) at 7, 1.19 (``calls originating in our network and intended for TRICOM were being blocked by limitations on the capacity attributable solely to TRICOM''). See Answer, Exhibit 7 (INDOTEL Petition) at 8, 2.1 (AACR was forced to ``request from international companies with whom [it] hold[s] correspondent relations to abstain from sending [AACR] calls intended for TRICOM network [sic], due to the inability to
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-12-2A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-12-2A1.pdf
  • (116) Contour Measure 2005 2.04 2.17 2.40 (108) (64) (42) 2007 2.31 2.46 2.51 (98) (73) (59) 2009 1.70 1.76 1.77 (103) (68) (75) Religion Format Market Measure 2005 2.14 1.65 1.30 * (55) (41) (52) 2007 1.53 1.85 1.33 (39) (32) (62) 2009 1.18 1.59 0.88 (34) (36) (57) Contour Measure 2005 1.70 1.55 1.93 (73) (42) (33) 2007 1.19 1.51 1.95 * (53) (40) (40) 2009 0.88 1.22 1.46 * (53) (31) (43) Table 11 (continued) Average Full-Service Commercial FM Stations' Revenue per Adult by Format Year No LPFM One LPFM Two or More LPFM News/Talk/Sports Format Market Measure 2005 3.02 2.35 2.46 (35) (20) (44) 2007 2.83 2.87 2.19 (25) (33) (71) 2009 1.94 1.94 1.66 (38) (46)
• http://www.fcc.gov/ib/sand/agree/files/mex-bc/am.pdf
  • shall aot exceed 0.1 Hz. The sodulation delay between any two transmitters in the network shall not exceed LO@ ukroseconds,when measured at either transmftter site. StatiOU wwer L.16 I.17 Unmodulated carr-fer power supplied to the antenna. Groundwave Electromagnetic wave vhfch is propagated aloag the surface of the Earth or near it and which hasnot been rEElected by the ionosphere, 1.18 1.19 10% of the 1.20 SO% of the 1.21 horizontal conducting antenna. 1.22 Skywave Electromagnetic wave which has been reflected by the ionosphere= Skywave field strength, 10% of the time The value of a skywave stgnal vhlch is not exceeded for nmre than period of observation. Skyvave field strength, SO% of the time The value of a skyvave signal which Fs
• http://www.fcc.gov/ib/sand/mniab/traffic/files/ITRND01.pdf
  • 1.61 1966 32.3 100.1 47.6 52.5 18.9 30.1 3.10 1.47 1.63 1.59 1.61 1967 39.7 114.2 54.6 59.6 23.4 31.8 2.88 1.38 1.50 1.36 1.45 1968 46.4 126.9 61.5 65.4 28.2 40.0 2.73 1.33 1.41 1.42 1.41 1969 64.6 172.0 82.7 89.4 38.3 51.6 2.66 1.28 1.38 1.35 1.37 1970 81.1 196.6 98.9 97.7 51.0 59.8 2.43 1.22 1.21 1.17 1.19 1971 100.9 237.4 120.7 116.6 68.4 75.1 2.35 1.20 1.16 1.10 1.13 1972 126.5 291.8 148.2 143.6 91.7 98.6 2.31 1.17 1.14 1.08 1.11 1973 159.3 364.9 184.4 180.5 111.5 120.2 2.29 1.16 1.13 1.08 1.11 1974 190.7 428.7 216.6 212.1 142.0 152.2 2.25 1.14 1.11 1.07 1.09 1975 219.4 490.2 247.4 242.9 167.0 176.9 2.23 1.13 1.11 1.06 1.09
• http://www.fcc.gov/mb/peer_review/prlpfm_rpt_economic_study.pdf
  • a full-service commercial FM station with a median power level and height above average terrain ("HAAT") has a range of approximately 26 miles, in comparison to 3.5 miles for the median LPFM station. Therefore, the areas covered are 2,104 square miles for the full-service commercial FM station versus 38 square miles for the LPFM station, a ratio of 55 to 1.19 10. Full-service stations are more heavily concentrated in urban areas than LPFM stations. For example, 5.7 percent of all full-service stations and 4.4 percent of full-service commercial FM stations are located in the top 10 Arbitron Metros. The top 50 markets have 18.8 percent of all full- service stations and 15.8 percent of full-service commercial FM stations. In addition, 40.9
• http://www.fcc.gov/ogc/documents/opinions/2004/02-1175-091704.pdf
  • Sobel Order, 17 FCC Rd at 1893-94 (JA 335-36); Kay Order, 17 FCC Rcd at 1865 (JA 866). In addition, the Commission imposed a $10,000 forfeiture on Kay for his violation of Section 308(b). Kay Order, 17 FCC Rcd at 1864-65 (JA 865-66). Kay does not challenge the forfeiture sanction in his appeal of the Kay Order. See Brief, p. 1.19 After unsuccessful attempts by Appellants to secure reconsideration,20 see Sobel Recon- sideration Order, 17 FCC 8562 (JA 398); Sobel Further Reconsideration Order, 19 FCC Rcd 801 (JA 419); Kay Reconsideration Order, 17 FCC Rcd at 8554 (JA 893), Appellants timely filed the 19 Appellants request (Brief, p. 58) the Court to reverse and remand these cases to the FCC for
• http://www.fcc.gov/omd/privacyact/System_of_records/pia-broadband-dead-zone-report.pdf
  • Please also provide the citation that was published in the Federal Register for the SORN: 1.17 What are the purposes or functions that make it necessary to create a new a system of records notice (SORN) for this information system, e.g., why is the information being collected? 1.18 Where is this information for the system of records notice (SORN) located? 1.19 Is the use of the information both relevant and necessary to the purposes for which the information system is designed, e.g., is the SORN only collecting and using information for the specific purposes for which the SORN was designed so that there is no "extraneous" information included in the database(s) or paper files? Yes No 2 The initial system of
• http://www.fcc.gov/omd/privacyact/System_of_records/pia-ccd.pdf
  • Comment Card Database information system. PSHSB may use either and/or both the electronic and paper (hardcopy) comment cards in other PSHSB public events, such as summits, conferences, forums, expos, lectures, etc. 1.18 Where is this information for the system of records notice (SORN) located? This information system will be located in the FCC's Public Safety and Homeland Security Bureau (PSHSB). 1.19 Is the use of the information both relevant and necessary to the purposes for which the information system is designed, e.g., is the SORN only collecting and using information for the specific purposes for which the SORN was designed so that there is no "extraneous" information included in the database(s) or paper files? Yes No Please explain your response: The
• http://www.fcc.gov/omd/privacyact/System_of_records/pia-core-financial.pdf
  • information for the system of records notice (SORN) located? The location of the CFSR information system that will be covered by this SORN will be determined when the award of the contract takes place, and who will host the CFSR information system. OMD-FO is also responsible for the uses of this PII in the information system's development, processes, and activities. 1.19 Is the use of the information both relevant and necessary to the purposes for which the information system is designed, e.g., is the SORN only collecting and using information for the specific purposes for which the SORN was designed so that there is no "extraneous" information included in the database(s) or paper files? Yes No Please explain your response: The
• http://www.fcc.gov/omd/privacyact/System_of_records/pia-criminal-investigative-files.pdf
  • Please also provide the citation that was published in the Federal Register for the SORN: 1.17 What are the purposes or functions that make it necessary to create a new a system of records notice (SORN) for this information system, e.g., why is the information being collected? 1.18 Where is this information for the system of records notice (SORN) located? 1.19 Is the use of the information both relevant and necessary to the purposes for which the information system is designed, e.g., is the SORN only collecting and using information for the specific purposes for which the SORN was designed so that there is no "extraneous" information included in the database(s) or paper files? Yes No Please explain your response: If
• http://www.fcc.gov/omd/privacyact/System_of_records/pia-crisis.pdf
  • Please also provide the citation that was published in the Federal Register for the SORN: 1.17 What are the purposes or functions that make it necessary to create a new a system of records notice (SORN) for this information system, e.g., why is the information being collected? 1.18 Where is this information for the system of records notice (SORN) located? 1.19 Is the use of the information both relevant and necessary to the purposes for which the information system is designed, e.g., is the SORN only collecting and using information for the specific purposes for which the SORN was designed so that there is no "extraneous" information included in the database(s) or paper files? Yes No Please explain your response: 11
• http://www.fcc.gov/omd/privacyact/System_of_records/pia-dqc.pdf
  • also provide the citation that was published in the Federal Register for the SORN: 1.17 What are the purposes or functions that make it necessary to create a new a system of records notice (SORN) for this information system, e.g., why is the information being collected? 1.18 Where is this information for the system of records notice (SORN) located? 11 1.19 Is the use of the information both relevant and necessary to the purposes for which the information system is designed, e.g., is the SORN only collecting and using information for the specific purposes for which the SORN was designed so that there is no "extraneous" information included in the database(s) or paper files? Yes No Please explain your response: If
• http://www.fcc.gov/omd/privacyact/System_of_records/pia-ecfs.pdf
  • also provide the citation that was published in the Federal Register for the SORN: 11 1.17 What are the purposes or functions that make it necessary to create a new a system of records notice (SORN) for this information system, e.g., why is the information being collected? 1.18 Where is this information for the system of records notice (SORN) located? 1.19 Is the use of the information both relevant and necessary to the purposes for which the information system is designed, e.g., is the SORN only collecting and using information for the specific purposes for which the SORN was designed so that there is no "extraneous" information included in the database(s) or paper files? Yes No Please explain your response: If
• http://www.fcc.gov/omd/privacyact/System_of_records/pia-email.pdf
  • Please also provide the citation that was published in the Federal Register for the SORN: 1.17 What are the purposes or functions that make it necessary to create a new a system of records notice (SORN) for this information system, e.g., why is the information being collected? 1.18 Where is this information for the system of records notice (SORN) located? 1.19 Is the use of the information both relevant and necessary to the purposes for which the information system is designed, e.g., is the SORN only collecting and using information for the specific purposes for which the SORN was designed so that there is no "extraneous" information included in the database(s) or paper files? Yes No Please explain your response: If
• http://www.fcc.gov/omd/privacyact/System_of_records/pia-experimental-radio.pdf
  • Please also provide the citation that was published in the Federal Register for the SORN: 1.17 What are the purposes or functions that make it necessary to create a new a system of records notice (SORN) for this information system, e.g., why is the information being collected? 1.18 Where is this information for the system of records notice (SORN) located? 1.19 Is the use of the information both relevant and necessary to the purposes for which the information system is designed, e.g., is the SORN only collecting and using information for the specific purposes for which the SORN was designed so that there is no "extraneous" information included in the database(s) or paper files? Yes No Please explain your response: If
• http://www.fcc.gov/omd/privacyact/System_of_records/pia-faca.pdf
  • also provide the citation that was published in the Federal Register for the SORN: 1.17 What are the purposes or functions that make it necessary to create a new a system of records notice (SORN) for this information system, e.g., why is the information being collected? 1.18 Where is this information for the system of records notice (SORN) located? 11 1.19 Is the use of the information both relevant and necessary to the purposes for which the information system is designed, e.g., is the SORN only collecting and using information for the specific purposes for which the SORN was designed so that there is no "extraneous" information included in the database(s) or paper files? Yes No Please explain your response: If
• http://www.fcc.gov/omd/privacyact/System_of_records/pia-financial.pdf
  • or functions that make it necessary to create a new a system of records notice (SORN) for this information system, e.g., why is the information being collected? The new SORN is needed to be created to separate the business processes. 1.18 Where is this information for the system of records notice (SORN) located? Office of the Managing Director-Financial Operations (OMD-FO). 1.19 Is the use of the information both relevant and necessary to the purposes for which the information system is designed, e.g., is the SORN only collecting and using information for the specific purposes for which the SORN was designed so that there is no "extraneous" information included in the database(s) or paper files? Yes No Please explain your response: This
• http://www.fcc.gov/omd/privacyact/System_of_records/pia-foia.pdf
  • Please also provide the citation that was published in the Federal Register for the SORN: 1.17 What are the purposes or functions that make it necessary to create a new a system of records notice (SORN) for this information system, e.g., why is the information being collected? 1.18 Where is this information for the system of records notice (SORN) located? 1.19 Is the use of the information both relevant and necessary to the purposes for which the information system is designed, e.g., is the SORN only collecting and using information for the specific purposes for which the SORN was designed so that there is no "extraneous" information included in the database(s) or paper files? Yes No Please explain your response: If
• http://www.fcc.gov/omd/privacyact/System_of_records/pia-general-investigative-files.pdf
  • Please also provide the citation that was published in the Federal Register for the SORN: 1.17 What are the purposes or functions that make it necessary to create a new a system of records notice (SORN) for this information system, e.g., why is the information being collected? 1.18 Where is this information for the system of records notice (SORN) located? 1.19 Is the use of the information both relevant and necessary to the purposes for which the information system is designed, e.g., is the SORN only collecting and using information for the specific purposes for which the SORN was designed so that there is no "extraneous" information included in the database(s) or paper files? Yes No Please explain your response: If
• http://www.fcc.gov/omd/privacyact/System_of_records/pia-ils.pdf
  • Please also provide the citation that was published in the Federal Register for the SORN: 1.17 What are the purposes or functions that make it necessary to create a new a system of records notice (SORN) for this information system, e.g., why is the information being collected? 1.18 Where is this information for the system of records notice (SORN) located? 1.19 Is the use of the information both relevant and necessary to the purposes for which the information system is designed, e.g., is the SORN only collecting and using information for the specific purposes for which the SORN was designed so that there is no "extraneous" information included in the database(s) or paper files? 10 Yes No Please explain your response:
• http://www.fcc.gov/omd/privacyact/System_of_records/pia-investigations-hearings.pdf
  • also provide the citation that was published in the Federal Register for the SORN: 11 1.17 What are the purposes or functions that make it necessary to create a new a system of records notice (SORN) for this information system, e.g., why is the information being collected? 1.18 Where is this information for the system of records notice (SORN) located? 1.19 Is the use of the information both relevant and necessary to the purposes for which the information system is designed, e.g., is the SORN only collecting and using information for the specific purposes for which the SORN was designed so that there is no "extraneous" information included in the database(s) or paper files? Yes No Please explain your response: If
• http://www.fcc.gov/omd/privacyact/System_of_records/pia-labor-employee-relations.pdf
  • also provide the citation that was published in the Federal Register for the SORN: 1.17 What are the purposes or functions that make it necessary to create a new a system of records notice (SORN) for this information system, e.g., why is the information being collected? 1.18 Where is this information for the system of records notice (SORN) located? 11 1.19 Is the use of the information both relevant and necessary to the purposes for which the information system is designed, e.g., is the SORN only collecting and using information for the specific purposes for which the SORN was designed so that there is no "extraneous" information included in the database(s) or paper files? Yes No Please explain your response: If
• http://www.fcc.gov/omd/privacyact/System_of_records/pia-lmts.pdf
  • This correspondence may include attachments from parties outside the FCC that contain personally identifiable information (PII), which are included as the basis or justification for sending the correspondence to the FCC. 1.18 Where is this information for the system of records notice (SORN) located? Office of Legislative Affairs (OLA), Federal Communications Commission (FCC), 445 12th Street, S.W., Washington, DC 20554. 1.19 Is the use of the information both relevant and necessary to the purposes for which the information system is designed, e.g., is the SORN only collecting and using information for the specific purposes for which the SORN was designed so that there is no "extraneous" information included in the database(s) or paper files? Yes No Please explain your response: The
• http://www.fcc.gov/omd/privacyact/System_of_records/pia-pams.pdf
  • and contractors do not have to supply this information. The FCC requests this information along with periodic updates to keep any contact information current. 1.18 Where is this information for the system of records notice (SORN) located? Associate Managing Director-Administrative Operations (AMD-AO), Office of Managing Director (OMD), Federal Communications Commission (FCC), 445 12th Street, S.W., Room TW-C201, Washington, DC 20554. 1.19 Is the use of the information both relevant and necessary to the purposes for which the information system is designed, e.g., is the SORN only collecting and using information for the specific purposes for which the SORN was designed so that there is no "extraneous" information included in the database(s) or paper files? 11 Yes No Please explain your response:
• http://www.fcc.gov/omd/privacyact/System_of_records/pia-pay-leave-garnish.pdf
  • Please also provide the citation that was published in the Federal Register for the SORN: 1.17 What are the purposes or functions that make it necessary to create a new a system of records notice (SORN) for this information system, e.g., why is the information being collected? 1.18 Where is this information for the system of records notice (SORN) located? 1.19 Is the use of the information both relevant and necessary to the purposes for which the information system is designed, e.g., is the SORN only collecting and using information for the specific purposes for which the SORN was designed so that there is no "extraneous" information included in the database(s) or paper files? Yes No Please explain your response: If
• http://www.fcc.gov/omd/privacyact/System_of_records/pia-personal-security-files.pdf
  • Please also provide the citation that was published in the Federal Register for the SORN: 1.17 What are the purposes or functions that make it necessary to create a new a system of records notice (SORN) for this information system, e.g., why is the information being collected? 1.18 Where is this information for the system of records notice (SORN) located? 1.19 Is the use of the information both relevant and necessary to the purposes for which the information system is designed, e.g., is the SORN only collecting and using information for the specific purposes for which the SORN was designed so that there is no "extraneous" information included in the database(s) or paper files? Yes No Please explain your response: If
• http://www.fcc.gov/omd/privacyact/System_of_records/pia-physical-access.pdf
  • also provide the citation that was published in the Federal Register for the SORN: 1.17 What are the purposes or functions that make it necessary to create a new a system of records notice (SORN) for this information system, e.g., why is the information being collected? 1.18 Where is this information for the system of records notice (SORN) located? 11 1.19 Is the use of the information both relevant and necessary to the purposes for which the information system is designed, e.g., is the SORN only collecting and using information for the specific purposes for which the SORN was designed so that there is no "extraneous" information included in the database(s) or paper files? Yes No Please explain your response: If
• http://www.fcc.gov/omd/privacyact/System_of_records/pia-reasonable-accommodation-requests.pdf
  • also provide the citation that was published in the Federal Register for the SORN: 1.17 What are the purposes or functions that make it necessary to create a new a system of records notice (SORN) for this information system, e.g., why is the information being collected? 1.18 Where is this information for the system of records notice (SORN) located? 11 1.19 Is the use of the information both relevant and necessary to the purposes for which the information system is designed, e.g., is the SORN only collecting and using information for the specific purposes for which the SORN was designed so that there is no "extraneous" information included in the database(s) or paper files? Yes No Please explain your response: If
• http://www.fcc.gov/omd/privacyact/System_of_records/pia-remedy.pdf
  • Please also provide the citation that was published in the Federal Register for the SORN: 1.17 What are the purposes or functions that make it necessary to create a new a system of records notice (SORN) for this information system, e.g., why is the information being collected? 1.18 Where is this information for the system of records notice (SORN) located? 1.19 Is the use of the information both relevant and necessary to the purposes for which the information system is designed, e.g., is the SORN only collecting and using information for the specific purposes for which the SORN was designed so that there is no "extraneous" information included in the database(s) or paper files? Yes No Please explain your response: If
• http://www.fcc.gov/omd/privacyact/System_of_records/pia-rmis.pdf
  • register to pay regulatory fees, apply for or renew licenses, and conduct other financial and telecommunications activities with the FCC. 1.18 Where is this information for the system of records notice (SORN) located? The RMIS is located in the Financial Operations Division of the Office of the Managing Director (OMD-FO) at FCC Headquarters, 445 12th Street, S.W., Washington, DC 20554. 1.19 Is the use of the information both relevant and necessary to the purposes for which the information system is designed, e.g., is the SORN only collecting and using information for the specific purposes for which the SORN was designed so that there is no "extraneous" information included in the database(s) or paper files? Yes No Please explain your response: The
• http://www.fcc.gov/omd/privacyact/System_of_records/pia-small-business-contacts.pdf
  • also provide the citation that was published in the Federal Register for the SORN: 11 1.17 What are the purposes or functions that make it necessary to create a new a system of records notice (SORN) for this information system, e.g., why is the information being collected? 1.18 Where is this information for the system of records notice (SORN) located? 1.19 Is the use of the information both relevant and necessary to the purposes for which the information system is designed, e.g., is the SORN only collecting and using information for the specific purposes for which the SORN was designed so that there is no "extraneous" information included in the List (s) or paper files? Yes No Please explain your response:
• http://www.fcc.gov/omd/privacyact/System_of_records/pia-telephone-call-details.pdf
  • also provide the citation that was published in the Federal Register for the SORN: 1.17 What are the purposes or functions that make it necessary to create a new a system of records notice (SORN) for this information system, e.g., why is the information being collected? 1.18 Where is this information for the system of records notice (SORN) located? 12 1.19 Is the use of the information both relevant and necessary to the purposes for which the information system is designed, e.g., is the SORN only collecting and using information for the specific purposes for which the SORN was designed so that there is no "extraneous" information included in the database(s) or paper files? Yes No Please explain your response: If
• http://www.fcc.gov/omd/privacyact/System_of_records/pia-transit.pdf
  • Please also provide the citation that was published in the Federal Register for the SORN: 1.17 What are the purposes or functions that make it necessary to create a new a system of records notice (SORN) for this information system, e.g., why is the information being collected? 1.18 Where is this information for the system of records notice (SORN) located? 1.19 Is the use of the information both relevant and necessary to the purposes for which the information system is designed, e.g., is the SORN only collecting and using information for the specific purposes for which the SORN was designed so that there is no "extraneous" information included in the database(s) or paper files? Yes No Please explain your response: If
• http://www.fcc.gov/omd/privacyact/System_of_records/pia-uls.pdf
  • Please also provide the citation that was published in the Federal Register for the SORN: 1.17 What are the purposes or functions that make it necessary to create a new a system of records notice (SORN) for this information system, e.g., why is the information being collected? 1.18 Where is this information for the system of records notice (SORN) located? 1.19 Is the use of the information both relevant and necessary to the purposes for which the information system is designed, e.g., is the SORN only collecting and using information for the specific purposes for which the SORN was designed so that there is no "extraneous" information included in the database(s) or paper files? Yes No Please explain your response: If
• http://www.fcc.gov/omd/privacyact/System_of_records/pia-violators.pdf
  • Please also provide the citation that was published in the Federal Register for the SORN: 1.17 What are the purposes or functions that make it necessary to create a new a system of records notice (SORN) for this information system, e.g., why is the information being collected? 1.18 Where is this information for the system of records notice (SORN) located? 1.19 Is the use of the information both relevant and necessary to the purposes for which the information system is designed, e.g., is the SORN only collecting and using information for the specific purposes for which the SORN was designed so that there is no "extraneous" information included in the database(s) or paper files? Yes No Please explain your response: If
• http://www.fcc.gov/omd/privacyact/System_of_records/pshsb-coop-plan.pdf
  • also provide the citation that was published in the Federal Register for the SORN: 10 1.17 What are the purposes or functions that make it necessary to create a new a system of records notice (SORN) for this information system, e.g., why is the information being collected? 1.18 Where is this information for the system of records notice (SORN) located? 1.19 Is the use of the information both relevant and necessary to the purposes for which the information system is designed, e.g., is the SORN only collecting and using information for the specific purposes for which the SORN was designed so that there is no "extraneous" information included in the database(s) or paper files? Yes No Please explain your response: If
• http://www.fcc.gov/omd/privacyact/System_of_records/pta-broadband-dead-zone-report.pdf
  • explain your response: The Broadband Dead Zone Report and Consumer Broadband Test information system is a "non major" information system, and as such, it is exempt from the FIPS assessment guidelines. 1.18 When was "Certification and Accreditation" (C&A) last completed? The Broadband Dead Zone Report and Consumer Broadband Test information system is covered under the General Support Systems (GSS) C&A. 1.19 Has the Chief Information Officer (CIO) and/or the Chief Security Officer designated this information system as requiring an Independent risk assessment Independent security test and evaluation Other risk assessment and/or security testing procedure, etc. Not applicable. Please explain your response: The Broadband Dead Zone Report and Consumer Broadband Test information system is a "non major" information system, and as such,
• http://www.fcc.gov/omd/privacyact/System_of_records/pta-ccd.pdf
  • 1.17 Is this impact level consistent with the guidelines as determined by the FIPS 199 assessment? Yes No Please explain your response: The PSHSB Comment Card Database information system has not been given a FIPS 199 assessment. 1.18 When was "Certification and Accreditation" (C&A) last completed? The C&A for PSHSB Comment Card Database information system has not been done yet. 1.19 Has the Chief Information Officer (CIO) and/or the Chief Security Officer designated this information system as requiring an Independent risk assessment Independent security test and evaluation Other risk assessment and/or security testing procedure, etc. Not applicable. Please explain your response: The PSHSB Comment Card Database information system has not been evaluated to determine if it meets the threshold for these
• http://www.fcc.gov/omd/privacyact/System_of_records/pta-clarity.pdf
  • Yes No Please explain your response: The security review is underway and will be completed in FY2010. 1.18 When was "Certification and Accreditation" (C&A) last completed? Clarity is a new application in the FCC inventory. IT Infrastructure Security group is performing a security review on the application. Clarity will have an approved security review before it is placed in service. 1.19 Has the Chief Information Officer (CIO) and/or the Chief Security Officer (CSO) designated this information system as requiring an Independent risk assessment Independent security test and evaluation Other risk assessment and/or security testing procedure, etc. Clarity is included in the general security services (GSS) "enclave" (group). Not applicable. Please explain your response: 1.20 Based on the information that you have
• http://www.fcc.gov/omd/privacyact/System_of_records/pta-core-financial.pdf
  • data. 1.17 Is this impact level consistent with the guidelines as determined by the FIPS 199 assessment? Yes No Please explain your response: At this stage in its development, the CFSR has not received its FIPS 199 assessment. 1.18 When was "Certification and Accreditation" (C&A) last completed? At this stage in its development, the CFSR has not received its C&A. 1.19 Has the Chief Information Officer (CIO) and/or the Chief Security Officer designated this information system as requiring an Independent risk assessment Independent security test and evaluation Other risk assessment and/or security testing procedure, etc. Not applicable. Please explain your response: At this stage in its development, with the CFSR information system still in the planning stages, neither the CIO nor
• http://www.fcc.gov/omd/privacyact/System_of_records/pta-lmts.pdf
  • impact level consistent with the guidelines as determined by the FIPS 199 assessment? Yes No Please explain your response: The LMTS information system is a "non major" information system, and as such, it is exempt for the FIPS 199 assessment guidelines. 1.18 When was "Certification and Accreditation" (C&A) last completed? The latest C&A package was signed off in December, 2008. 1.19 Has the Chief Information Officer (CIO) and/or the Chief Security Officer designated this information system as requiring an Independent risk assessment Independent security test and evaluation Other risk assessment and/or security testing procedure, etc. Not applicable. Please explain your response: LMTS is not classified as a major information system; and therefore, LMTS requires no consideration other than a C&A. 1.20
• http://www.fcc.gov/omd/privacyact/System_of_records/pta-pams.pdf
  • with the guidelines as determined by the FIPS 199 assessment? Yes No Please explain your response: The PAMS information system is a "non major" information system, and as such, it is exempt from the FIPS assessment guidelines. 1.18 When was "Certification and Accreditation" (C&A) last completed? PAMS is a minor information system, and no C&A has been completed for it. 1.19 Has the Chief Information Officer (CIO) and/or the Chief Security Officer designated this information system as requiring an 11 Independent risk assessment Independent security test and evaluation Other risk assessment and/or security testing procedure, etc. Not applicable. Please explain your response: The PAMS information system is a "non major" information system, and as such, these designations have been deemed unnecessary.
• http://www.fcc.gov/omd/privacyact/System_of_records/pta-rmis.pdf
  • regulatory fees, apply for or renew a license, etc., including business information that business registrants provide, i.e., credit card data, bank accounts, etc. 1.17 Is this impact level consistent with the guidelines as determined by the FIPS 199 assessment? Yes No Please explain your response: 1.18 When was "Certification and Accreditation" (C&A) last completed? The C&A was completed in 2007. 1.19 Has the Chief Information Officer (CIO) and/or the Chief Security Officer designated this information system as requiring an Independent risk assessment Independent security test and evaluation Other risk assessment and/or security testing procedure, etc. Not applicable. Please explain your response: The staff in the Financial Operations Division of the Office of the Managing Director (OMD-FO) have not made a determination
• http://www.fcc.gov/ownership/materials/already-released/consumer090002.pdf
  • CL HITS 83 1.31 EZ/SAC 3 0.05 E 14 0.22 FS 202 3.69 EZ 13 0.21 FS/T 41 0.75 EZ/SAC 1 0.02 G 55 1 FS 96 1.52 G/B 1 0.02 FS/T 81 1.28 Jazz (J) 59 1.08 G 62 0.98 News (N) 37 0.68 J 118 1.87 News/Talk (N/T) 161 2.94 KIDS 1 0.02 NAC/AOR 2 0.04 N 75 1.19 O 352 6.43 N/T 170 2.69 Religious (REL) 200 3.65 O 394 6.24 Soft Adult Contemp. (SAC) 379 6.92 REL 276 4.37 SP 172 3.14 SAC 253 4.01 Sports (SPRTS) 70 1.28 SP 296 4.69 Talk 247 4.51 SPRTS 172 2.72 T/O 4 0.07 T 408 6.46 Unknown 360 6.57 T/CL AOR 7 0.11 T/J 5 0.08 UNK 6 0.1
• http://www.fcc.gov/transaction/att-comcast/comcast_separationagreement.pdf
  • Broadband Real Property" means all right, title and interest in real property, wherever located, held in the name of AT&T Broadband or any AT&T Broadband Entity; provided that AT&T Broadband Real Property does not include rights, title or interests (whether fee, leasehold or otherwise) in any AT&T Communications Real Property. "AT&T Broadband Subsidiaries" means those entities set forth on Schedule 1.19 and their respective Subsidiaries but excluding AT&T Broadband T-Holdings, Inc. (formerly TCI Telephony Holdings, Inc.) and its Subsidiaries. "AT&T Broadband's Share" has the meaning set forth in Section 6.04(b). "AT&T Common Stock" means the common stock, par value $1.00 per share, of AT&T. "AT&T Communications Action" has the meaning set forth in Section 6.02(d). "AT&T Communications Assets" means: (a) any
• http://www.fcc.gov/transaction/comsat-telenor/fcc01-369.pdf
  • or local law. 1.16 "MES" means a mobile earth station (i.e., a hand-held, portable or other mobile terminal capable of receiving and/or transmitting Wire Communications or Electronic Communications by satellite). 1.17 "Non U.S.-Licensed MES" means an Inmarsat MES other than a U.S.-Licensed MES. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION FCC 01-369 31 1.18 "Party" or "Parties" have the meaning given in the Preamble. 1.19 "Pro forma assignments" or "pro forma transfers of control" are transfers or assignments that do not "involve a substantial change in ownership or control" of the licenses as provided in 47 C.F.R. 63.24. 1. 20"Sensitive Information" means unclassified information regarding (i) the persons or facilities that are the subjects of Lawful U.S. Process, (ii) the identity of the government agency
• http://wwww.fcc.gov/e-file/ecfs.html
  • Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit 404 Not Found File not found. __________________________________________________________________ [1]mini_httpd/1.19 19dec2003 References 1. http://www.acme.com/software/mini_httpd/