FCC Web Documents citing 1.17

as compiled by hallikainen.com/FccRules on 2012 07 01

• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4679A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4679A1.pdf
  • No. EB-06-IH-2019 NAL Account No. 200732080001 FRN No. 0014170831 FORFEITURE ORDER Adopted: November 19, 2007 Released: November 20, 2007 By the Chief, Investigations and Hearings Division, Enforcement Bureau: INTRODUCTION In this Forfeiture Order, we find that C5 Communications, LLC (``C5 Communications'' or the ``Company''), Applicant for Special Temporary Authority (``STA'') to Operate a 1.0 meter Ku-Band Earth Station, violated Section 1.17 of the Federal Communications Commission's (the ``Commission'' or ``FCC'') rules by twice using a false name to certify the accuracy of certain matters to the Commission in the STA applications it filed with the Commission. For the reasons explained below, we conclude that C5 Communications is liable for a forfeiture in the amount of seventeen thousand five hundred dollars ($17,500).
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4876A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4876A1.pdf
  • Radio Services ) ) ) ) ) ) ) File No. EB-07-IH-4914 FRN No. 0003477551 NAL Account No. 200732080027 ORDER Adopted: December 6, 2007 Released: December 7, 2007 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: In this Order, we adopt a Consent Decree terminating an investigation by the Enforcement Bureau (the ``Bureau'') into compliance by BP Exploration (Alaska), Inc. (``BPXA''), with Section 1.17 of the Commission's Rules. The Bureau and BPXA have negotiated the terms of a Consent Decree that would terminate the Bureau's investigation. A copy of the Consent Decree is attached hereto. We have reviewed the terms of the Consent Decree and evaluated the facts before us. We believe that the public interest would be served by approving the Consent Decree
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4992A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4992A1.pdf
  • $6,000 forfeiture for violation of Section 72.1216 in a single contest) (forfeiture paid); AMFM Radio Licenses LLC, et al, Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture, 19 FCC Rcd 5005 (2004) (maximum forfeiture imposed for each of multiple indecency rule violations) (forfeiture paid). See 47 U.S.C. § 503(b). See 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.111, 0.311 and 1.80. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 73.1216, 1.17 and 73.1015. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1914. For purposes of the forfeiture proceeding initiated by this NAL, Multicultural Radio Broadcasting Licensee, LLC shall be the only party to this proceeding. (continued....) Federal Communications Commission DA 07-4992 Federal Communications Commission DA 07-4992 ' ( v w '' - (R) ¯ ° ± µ ¾ à û h¢m h¢m h¢m h¢m �
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1920A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1920A1.pdf
  • CO 80021. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Kris Anne Monteith Chief, Enforcement Bureau 47 C.F.R. § 9.5(b). In a companion decision issued concurrently with this NAL, we propose a forfeiture of $25,000 against Cardinal for willfully providing incorrect material factual information to the Commission without a reasonable basis for believing that the information was correct and accurate in apparent violation of Section 1.17 of the Rules. Cardinal Broadband LLC, Notice of Apparent Liability, DA 08-1921 (Enf. Bur., rel. August 15, 2008). An interconnected VoIP service is a service that: (1) enables real-time, two-way voice communications; (2) requires a broadband connection from the user's location; (3) requires Internet Protocol-compatible customer premises equipment; and (4) permits users generally to receive calls that originate on the
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1921A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1921A1.pdf
  • Adopted: August 15, 2008 Released: August 15, 2008 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: I. introduction In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL''), we find Cardinal Broadband, LLC, aka Sovereign Telecommunications, a wholly owned subsidiary of Cardinal Communications, Inc. (hereinafter, ``Cardinal''), apparently liable for a forfeiture in the amount of twenty-five thousand dollars ($25,000) for willful violation of Section 1.17(a)(2) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''). The noted apparent violation involves Cardinal's provision of incorrect material factual information to the Commission without a reasonable basis for believing that the information was correct and accurate. II. BACKGROUND On July 13, 2007, the Commission received a complaint alleging that Cardinal, an interconnected Voice over Internet Protocol (``VoIP'') service provider, was not providing E911
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-410A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-410A1.pdf
  • Partnership, Memorandum Opinion and Order, 17 FCC Rcd 21861, 21863-64 (2002) (``Eure''); MTD, Inc., Memorandum Opinion and Order, 6 FCC Rcd 34, 35 (1991); Wagenvoord Broadcasting Co., Memorandum Opinion and Order, 35 FCC 2d 361 (1972). See Eure, 17 FCC Rcd at 21863-64; Triad Broadcasting Company, Inc., Memorandum Opinion and Order, 96 FCC 2d 1235, 1244 (1984). See 47 C.F.R. §1.17. See Southern California, 7 FCC Rcd at 3455 (a licensee's ``frank'' response to a letter of inquiry did not warrant a downward adjustment as ``complete candor'' is required). 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.111, 0.311, 1.80(f)(4). (continued....) Federal Communications Commission DA 08-410 Federal Communications Commission DA 08-410 œ Î Ï Ð Ñ � ½ D ]
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-563A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-563A1.pdf
  • for a downward adjustment in a forfeiture. Finally, the Region found that, contrary to CRC's request for a reduction based on CRC's history of compliance with the Rules, the president of CRC, James Kay, had a history of noncompliance. Specifically, in a prior proceeding, the Commission found that Kay deliberately withheld material information from the Commission, in violation of Section 1.17 of the Rules, and issued a forfeiture of $10,000 to Kay. Because of Kay's previous noncompliance, the Region declined to find that CRC has a history of compliance with the Rules. III. DISCUSSION Reconsideration is appropriate only where the petitioner either demonstrates a material error or omission in the underlying order or raises additional facts not known or not existing
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-778A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-778A1.pdf
  • Sprint engaged in unreasonable and discriminatory practices in violation of sections 201(b) and 202 of the Communications Act by refusing to provide service through the toll-free telephone numbers 800-AMERICA and 888-AMERICA; and (2) Sprint engaged in misrepresentation to the Federal Communications Commission in its response to DeMoss's informal complaint, in violation of 18 U.S.C. section 1001 and 47 C.F.R. section 1.17. DeMoss further requested a separate damages proceeding under 47 C.F.R. section 1.722(d). III. DISCUSSION It is well established that the complainant has the burden of proof in a formal complaint proceeding under section 208 of the Act. Thus, to prevail, a complainant must demonstrate by a preponderance of the evidence that the alleged violation of the Act or the Commission's
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1198A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1198A1.pdf
  • did not contain any certification information or other information from the Shenzhen Grant or CIC Grant. 47 C.F.R. § 2.925, 47 C.F.R. § 2.803(a)(1). Any false statement made knowingly and willfully in reply to this inquiry is punishable by fine or imprisonment under Title 18 of the U.S. Code. 18 U.S.C. §§ 1001 et seq; see also 47 C.F.R. § 1.17. 47 U.S.C. §§ 302a(b), 503(b), 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.111, 0.311, 1.80(f)(4), 2.803(a)(1). 47 U.S.C. § 403. 47 U.S.C. § 504(a). Federal Communications Commission DA 09-1198 Federal Communications Commission DA 09-1198 S T V $ � 4 0
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-119A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-119A1.pdf
  • in the Section 503(b) context. See, e.g., Southern California Broadcasting Co., Memorandum Opinion and Order, 6 FCC Rcd 4387, 4387-88 ¶ 5 (1991) (``Southern California Broadcasting''). 47 U.S.C. § 154(i). 47 U.S.C. § 154(j). 47 U.S.C. § 403. 47 C.F.R. § 76.939 (``Cable operators shall comply with ... the Commission's requests for information, orders, and decisions.''). See 47 C.F.R. § 1.17. See, e.g., SBC Communications, Inc., Forfeiture Order, 17 FCC Rcd 7589, 7599-7600 ¶¶ 23-28 (2002) (ordering $100,000 forfeiture for egregious and intentional failure to certify the response to a Bureau inquiry) (``SBC Forfeiture Order''); Digital Antenna, Inc., Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture and Order, 23 FCC Rcd 7600, 7602 (Spectr. Enf. Div., Enf. Bur. 2008) (proposing $11,000 forfeiture for
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-147A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-147A1.pdf
  • Inter Tech's marketing of an unauthorized FM broadcast transmitter. In addition, we propose a forfeiture in the amount of eleven thousand dollars ($11,000) against Inter Tech for providing to the Commission, during the course of this investigation, material factual information that is incorrect without a reasonable basis for believing the material factual information was correct, in willful violation of Section 1.17(a)(2) of the Rules. We accordingly propose a total forfeiture of eighteen thousand dollars ($18,000). background In response to complaints alleging that Inter Tech was marketing unauthorized FM broadcast transmitters in the United States, the Spectrum Enforcement Division of the Enforcement Bureau (``Division'') began an investigation. As part of this investigation, Division Staff reviewed Inter Tech's website on February 7, 2008,
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1513A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1513A1.pdf
  • 6. We note that in a related matter that the Division issued a Notice of Apparent Liability to Inter Tech for its unauthorized marketing of a single, now discontinued transmitter, the Cybermax FF TX 1, in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act and Section 2.803(a) of the Rules, and for providing incorrect material factual information in violation of Section 1.17(a)(2) of the Rules. The Division action was limited to the discontinued transmitter only and did not address the transmitters subject to this proceeding. See Inter Tech FM, Notice of Apparently Liability for Forfeiture, 24 FCC Rcd 1151 (Enf. Bur., Spectrum Enf. Div. 2009), response pending. See First Response at 4. See also 47 C.F.R. § 73.1660(a)(1) (requiring AM, FM or
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1733A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1733A1.pdf
  • its LOI Response, Jones failed to identify Vystar Credit Union as a nonprofit entity at that time. The Licensee's carelessness in its earlier filing resulted in an inaccurate conclusion in the NAL and wasted government resources. Although we will exclude the Vystar Credit Union announcement from our forfeiture calculation, we admonish Jones for its negligent misrepresentation in violation of Section 1.17 of our Rules, and caution the Licensee to exercise greater care in its responses to the Commission in the future. 13. Finally, Jones asserts that ``no penalty should be imposed, and that, should any penalty have been justified, it should have been no more than a nominal amount less than $500.'' We are unconvinced that either cancellation or a minimal
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1958A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1958A1.pdf
  • representative may, in writing, require from any applicant, permittee, or licensee written statements of fact relevant to a determination whether an application should be granted or denied, or to a determination whether a license should be revoked, or to any other matter within the jurisdiction of the Commission'' and that any such statements are subject to the provisions of Section 1.17 of the Rules. Section 1.17 of the Rules requires that any person that receives a letter of inquiry from the Commission or its staff ``shall not intentionally provide material factual information that is incorrect or intentionally omit material information that is necessary to prevent any material factual statement that is made from being incorrect or misleading.'' As noted above, the
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2584A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2584A1.pdf
  • 2009 Released: December 14, 2009 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: In this Order, we adopt the attached Consent Decree entered into between the Enforcement Bureau and BNSF Railway Company (``BNSF''). The Consent Decree terminates an investigation by the Bureau of BNSF's compliance with Section 310(d) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, relating to assignments of licenses, and Section 1.17 of the Commission's Rules, relating to truthful statements to the Commission. The Bureau and BNSF have negotiated the terms of the Consent Decree that resolve this matter. A copy of the Consent Decree is attached hereto and incorporated by reference. After reviewing the terms of the Consent Decree and evaluating the facts before us, we find that the public interest
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2584A2.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2584A2.pdf
  • 201032080013 FRN No. 0004772877 CONSENT DECREE The Enforcement Bureau of the Federal Communications Commission and BNSF Railway Company, by their authorized representatives, hereby enter into this Consent Decree for the purpose of resolving the Enforcement Bureau's investigation of compliance by BNSF Railway Company with Section 310(d) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. § 310(d), and Sections 1.17 and 1.948 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.17, 1.948. I. DEFINITIONS For purposes of this Consent Decree, the following definitions shall apply: ``Act'' means the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. § 151 et seq. ``Adopting Order'' means an order of the Bureau adopting this Consent Decree without any modifications adverse to BNSF Railway Company. ``Any''
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-51A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-51A1.pdf
  • whether or when it was actually utilized. Id. Being uncertain whether the purported revision was ever substituted for the earlier promotional text, we will not consider PRC's broadcast of any of the post-September 2004 Rockin' Tomato Pizza Co. announcements in conjunction with our determination of the forfeiture amount. See generally, November 17th Reply. See id.; see also 47 C.F.R. § 1.17. See September 13th Response at 5-6. See id. See id. See 47 U.S.C. § 503(b); 47 C.F.R § 1.80. The Commission's Forfeiture Policy Statement and Amendment of Section 1.80 of the Rules to Incorporate the Forfeiture Guidelines, 12 FCC Rcd 17087, 17115 (1997) (``Forfeiture Policy Statement''), recon. denied 15 FCC Rcd 303 (1999); 47 C.F.R. § 1.80(b). 47 U.S.C. §
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-79A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-79A1.pdf
  • in the Section 503(b) context. See, e.g., Southern California Broadcasting Co., Memorandum Opinion and Order, 6 FCC Rcd 4387, 4387-88 ¶ 5 (1991) (``Southern California Broadcasting''). 47 U.S.C. § 154(i). 47 U.S.C. § 154(j). 47 U.S.C. § 403. 47 C.F.R. § 76.939 (``Cable operators shall comply with ... the Commission's requests for information, orders, and decisions.''). See 47 C.F.R. § 1.17. See, e.g., SBC Communications, Inc., Forfeiture Order, 17 FCC Rcd 7589, 7599-7600 ¶¶ 23-28 (ordering $100,000 forfeiture for egregious and intentional failure to certify the response to a Bureau inquiry) (``SBC Forfeiture Order''); Globcom, Inc., Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture and Order, 18 FCC Rcd 19893, 19898 n. 36 (2003) (noting delayed response to an LOI is considered dilatory
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-80A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-80A1.pdf
  • in the Section 503(b) context. See, e.g., Southern California Broadcasting Co., Memorandum Opinion and Order, 6 FCC Rcd 4387, 4387-88 ¶ 5 (1991) (``Southern California Broadcasting''). 47 U.S.C. § 154(i). 47 U.S.C. § 154(j). 47 U.S.C. § 403. 47 C.F.R. § 76.939 (``Cable operators shall comply with ... the Commission's requests for information, orders, and decisions.''). See 47 C.F.R. § 1.17. See, e.g., SBC Communications, Inc., Forfeiture Order, 17 FCC Rcd 7589, 7599-7600 ¶¶ 23-28 (2002) (ordering $100,000 forfeiture for egregious and intentional failure to certify the response to a Bureau inquiry) (``SBC Forfeiture Order''); Digital Antenna, Inc., Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture and Order, 23 FCC Rcd 7600, 7602 (Spectr. Enf. Div., Enf. Bur. 2008) (proposing $11,000 forfeiture for
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-81A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-81A1.pdf
  • in the Section 503(b) context. See, e.g., Southern California Broadcasting Co., Memorandum Opinion and Order, 6 FCC Rcd 4387, 4387-88 ¶ 5 (1991) (``Southern California Broadcasting''). 47 U.S.C. § 154(i). 47 U.S.C. § 154(j). 47 U.S.C. § 403. 47 C.F.R. § 76.939 (``Cable operators shall comply with ... the Commission's requests for information, orders, and decisions.''). See 47 C.F.R. § 1.17. See, e.g., SBC Communications, Inc., Forfeiture Order, 17 FCC Rcd 7589, 7599-7600 ¶¶ 23-28 (2002) (ordering $100,000 forfeiture for egregious and intentional failure to certify the response to a Bureau inquiry) (``SBC Forfeiture Order''); Digital Antenna, Inc., Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture and Order, 23 FCC Rcd 7600, 7602 (Spectr. Enf. Div., Enf. Bur. 2008) (proposing $11,000 forfeiture for
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-82A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-82A1.pdf
  • in the Section 503(b) context. See, e.g., Southern California Broadcasting Co., Memorandum Opinion and Order, 6 FCC Rcd 4387, 4387-88 ¶ 5 (1991) (``Southern California Broadcasting''). 47 U.S.C. § 154(i). 47 U.S.C. § 154(j). 47 U.S.C. § 403. 47 C.F.R. § 76.939 (``Cable operators shall comply with ... the Commission's requests for information, orders, and decisions.''). See 47 C.F.R. § 1.17. See, e.g., SBC Communications, Inc., Forfeiture Order, 17 FCC Rcd 7589, 7599-7600 ¶¶ 23-28 (2002) (ordering $100,000 forfeiture for egregious and intentional failure to certify the response to a Bureau inquiry) (``SBC Forfeiture Order''); Digital Antenna, Inc., Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture and Order, 23 FCC Rcd 7600, 7602 (Spectr. Enf. Div., Enf. Bur. 2008) (proposing $11,000 forfeiture for
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-83A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-83A1.pdf
  • in the Section 503(b) context. See, e.g., Southern California Broadcasting Co., Memorandum Opinion and Order, 6 FCC Rcd 4387, 4387-88 ¶ 5 (1991) (``Southern California Broadcasting''). 47 U.S.C. § 154(i). 47 U.S.C. § 154(j). 47 U.S.C. § 403. 47 C.F.R. § 76.939 (``Cable operators shall comply with ... the Commission's requests for information, orders, and decisions.''). See 47 C.F.R. § 1.17. See, e.g., SBC Communications, Inc., Forfeiture Order, 17 FCC Rcd 7589, 7599-7600 ¶¶ 23-28 (ordering $100,000 forfeiture for egregious and intentional failure to certify the response to a Bureau inquiry) (``SBC Forfeiture Order''); Digital Antenna, Inc., Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture and Order, 23 FCC Rcd 7600, 7602 (Spectr. Enf. Div., Enf. Bur. 2008) (proposing $11,000 forfeiture for failure
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-84A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-84A1.pdf
  • in the Section 503(b) context. See, e.g., Southern California Broadcasting Co., Memorandum Opinion and Order, 6 FCC Rcd 4387, 4387-88 ¶ 5 (1991) (``Southern California Broadcasting''). 47 U.S.C. § 154(i). 47 U.S.C. § 154(j). 47 U.S.C. § 403. 47 C.F.R. § 76.939 (``Cable operators shall comply with ... the Commission's requests for information, orders, and decisions.''). See 47 C.F.R. § 1.17. See, e.g., SBC Communications, Inc., Forfeiture Order, 17 FCC Rcd 7589, 7599-7600 ¶¶ 23-28 (ordering $100,000 forfeiture for egregious and intentional failure to certify the response to a Bureau inquiry) (``SBC Forfeiture Order''); Digital Antenna, Inc., Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture and Order, 23 FCC Rcd 7600, 7602 (Spectr. Enf. Div., Enf. Bur. 2008) (proposing $11,000 forfeiture for failure
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-85A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-85A1.pdf
  • in the Section 503(b) context. See, e.g., Southern California Broadcasting Co., Memorandum Opinion and Order, 6 FCC Rcd 4387, 4387-88 ¶ 5 (1991) (``Southern California Broadcasting''). 47 U.S.C. § 154(i). 47 U.S.C. § 154(j). 47 U.S.C. § 403. 47 C.F.R. § 76.939 (``Cable operators shall comply with ... the Commission's requests for information, orders, and decisions.''). See 47 C.F.R. § 1.17. See, e.g., SBC Communications, Inc., Forfeiture Order, 17 FCC Rcd 7589, 7599-7600 ¶¶ 23-28 (2002) (ordering $100,000 forfeiture for egregious and intentional failure to certify the response to a Bureau inquiry) (``SBC Forfeiture Order''); Digital Antenna, Inc., Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture and Order, 23 FCC Rcd 7600, 7602 (Spectr. Enf. Div., Enf. Bur. 2008) (proposing $11,000 forfeiture for
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-95A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-95A1.pdf
  • in the Section 503(b) context. See, e.g., Southern California Broadcasting Co., Memorandum Opinion and Order, 6 FCC Rcd 4387, 4387-88 ¶ 5 (1991) (``Southern California Broadcasting''). 47 U.S.C. § 154(i). 47 U.S.C. § 154(j). 47 U.S.C. § 403. 47 C.F.R. § 76.939 (``Cable operators shall comply with ... the Commission's requests for information, orders, and decisions.''). See 47 C.F.R. § 1.17. See, e.g., SBC Communications, Inc., Forfeiture Order, 17 FCC Rcd 7589, 7599-7600 ¶¶ 23-28 (2002) (ordering $100,000 forfeiture for egregious and intentional failure to certify the response to a Bureau inquiry) (``SBC Forfeiture Order''); Digital Antenna, Inc., Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture and Order, 23 FCC Rcd 7600, 7602 (Spectr. Enf. Div., Enf. Bur. 2008) (proposing $11,000 forfeiture for
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1268A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1268A1.pdf
  • Section II. Adjustment Criteria for Section 503 Forfeitures. See The Commission's Forfeiture Policy Statement and Amendment of Section 1.80 of the Rules to Incorporate the Forfeiture Guidelines, Report and Order, 12 FCC Rcd 17087 (1997), recon. denied, 15 FCC Rcd 303 (1999) (``Forfeiture Policy Statement''). Forfeiture Policy Statement, 12 FCC Rcd at 17099 ¶ 22. See id. Amendment of Section 1.17 of the Commission's Rules Concerning Truthful Statements to the Commission, Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, 17 FCC Rcd 3296, 3297 (2002). See also Amendment of Section 1.17 of the Commission's Rules Concerning Truthful Statements to the Commission Report and Order, 18 FCC Rcd 4016, 4021 (2003), recon. denied, Memorandum Opinion and Order, 19 FCC Rcd 5790, further recon. denied, Memorandum Opinion
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1975A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1975A1.pdf
  • File No. EB-09-SE-242; Provision of Incorrect Material Factual Information in a Commission Investigation Dear Mr. McCormack: This is an official CITATION, issued pursuant to section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Communications Act''), to Phonejammer.com (``Phonejammer'') for providing incorrect, material factual information to the Spectrum Enforcement Division (``Division'') of the Enforcement Bureau (``Bureau'') in violation of section 1.17(a)(2) of the Commission's rules (``Rules''). Specifically, in response to recent Commission inquiries, Phonejammer claimed that it does not market, and has not shipped or distributed, radio frequency devices designed to intentionally interfere with licensed cellular and Personal Communications Services (``PCS'') (``phone jammers'') to consumers in the United States. However, these statements are flatly contradicted by record evidence that, as recently
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2187A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2187A1.pdf
  • corresponding with the Commission. Under the Privacy Act of 1974, any statement or information provided by you may be used by the Commission to determine if further enforcement action is required. Any knowingly or willfully false statement, or concealment of any material fact, made in reply to this Citation is punishable by fine or imprisonment. Please also note that Section 1.17 of the Rules requires that you provide truthful and accurate statements to the Commission. CONTACT INFORMATION The closest FCC Office is the Los Angeles District Office in Cerritos, CA. You may contact this office by telephone, 562-860-7474, to schedule a personal interview, which must take place within thirty (30) days after the release date of this Citation. or call the
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2188A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2188A1.pdf
  • corresponding with the Commission. Under the Privacy Act of 1974, any statement or information provided by you may be used by the Commission to determine if further enforcement action is required. Any knowingly or willfully false statement, or concealment of any material fact, made in reply to this Citation is punishable by fine or imprisonment. Please also note that Section 1.17 of the Rules requires that you provide truthful and accurate statements to the Commission. CONTACT INFORMATION The closest FCC Office is the Los Angeles District Office in Cerritos, CA. You may contact this office by telephone, 562-860-7474, to schedule a personal interview, which must take place within thirty (30) days after the release date of this Citation. or call the
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2189A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2189A1.pdf
  • corresponding with the Commission. Under the Privacy Act of 1974, any statement or information provided by you may be used by the Commission to determine if further enforcement action is required. Any knowingly or willfully false statement, or concealment of any material fact, made in reply to this Citation is punishable by fine or imprisonment. Please also note that Section 1.17 of the Rules requires that you provide truthful and accurate statements to the Commission. CONTACT INFORMATION The closest FCC Office is the Los Angeles District Office in Cerritos, CA. You may contact this office by telephone, 562-860-7474, to schedule a personal interview, which must take place within thirty (30) days after the release date of this Citation. or call the
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2190A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2190A1.pdf
  • corresponding with the Commission. Under the Privacy Act of 1974, any statement or information provided by you may be used by the Commission to determine if further enforcement action is required. Any knowingly or willfully false statement, or concealment of any material fact, made in reply to this Citation is punishable by fine or imprisonment. Please also note that Section 1.17 of the Rules requires that you provide truthful and accurate statements to the Commission. CONTACT INFORMATION The closest FCC Office is the Denver Field Office in Denver, Colorado. You may contact this office by telephone, (303)231-5212, to schedule a personal interview, which must take place within twenty (20) days after the release date of this Citation. or call the Consumer
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2191A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2191A1.pdf
  • corresponding with the Commission. Under the Privacy Act of 1974, any statement or information provided by you may be used by the Commission to determine if further enforcement action is required. Any knowingly or willfully false statement, or concealment of any material fact, made in reply to this Citation is punishable by fine or imprisonment. Please also note that Section 1.17 of the Rules requires that you provide truthful and accurate statements to the Commission. CONTACT INFORMATION The closest FCC Office is the Denver Field Office in Denver, Colorado. You may contact this office by telephone, (303)231-5212, to schedule a personal interview, which must take place within twenty (20) days after the release date of this Citation. or call the Consumer
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2192A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2192A1.pdf
  • corresponding with the Commission. Under the Privacy Act of 1974, any statement or information provided by you may be used by the Commission to determine if further enforcement action is required. Any knowingly or willfully false statement, or concealment of any material fact, made in reply to this Citation is punishable by fine or imprisonment. Please also note that Section 1.17 of the Rules requires that you provide truthful and accurate statements to the Commission. CONTACT INFORMATION The closest FCC Office is the Denver Field Office in Denver, Colorado. You may contact this office by telephone, (303)231-5212, to schedule a personal interview, which must take place within twenty (20) days after the release date of this Citation. or call the Consumer
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2193A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2193A1.pdf
  • corresponding with the Commission. Under the Privacy Act of 1974, any statement or information provided by you may be used by the Commission to determine if further enforcement action is required. Any knowingly or willfully false statement, or concealment of any material fact, made in reply to this Citation is punishable by fine or imprisonment. Please also note that Section 1.17 of the Rules requires that you provide truthful and accurate statements to the Commission. CONTACT INFORMATION The closest FCC Office is the Denver Field Office in Denver, Colorado. You may contact this office by telephone, (303)231-5212, to schedule a personal interview, which must take place within twenty (20) days after the release date of this Citation. or call the Consumer
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2194A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2194A1.pdf
  • corresponding with the Commission. Under the Privacy Act of 1974, any statement or information provided by you may be used by the Commission to determine if further enforcement action is required. Any knowingly or willfully false statement, or concealment of any material fact, made in reply to this Citation is punishable by fine or imprisonment. Please also note that Section 1.17 of the Rules requires that you provide truthful and accurate statements to the Commission. CONTACT INFORMATION The closest FCC Office is the Denver Field Office in Denver, Colorado. You may contact this office by telephone, (303)231-5212, to schedule a personal interview, which must take place within twenty (20) days after the release date of this Citation. or call the Consumer
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2195A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2195A1.pdf
  • corresponding with the Commission. Under the Privacy Act of 1974, any statement or information provided by you may be used by the Commission to determine if further enforcement action is required. Any knowingly or willfully false statement, or concealment of any material fact, made in reply to this Citation is punishable by fine or imprisonment. Please also note that Section 1.17 of the Rules requires that you provide truthful and accurate statements to the Commission. CONTACT INFORMATION The closest FCC Office is the Denver Field Office in Denver, Colorado. You may contact this office by telephone, (303)231-5212, to schedule a personal interview, which must take place within twenty (20) days after the release date of this Citation. or call the Consumer
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2220A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2220A1.pdf
  • corresponding with the Commission. Under the Privacy Act of 1974, any statement or information provided by you may be used by the Commission to determine if further enforcement action is required. Any knowingly or willfully false statement, or concealment of any material fact, made in reply to this Citation is punishable by fine or imprisonment. Please also note that Section 1.17 of the Rules requires that you provide truthful and accurate statements to the Commission. CONTACT INFORMATION The closest FCC Office is the Atlanta Office, in Duluth, Georgia. You may contact Neal McNeil by telephone, 202-418-1160, to schedule a personal interview, which must take place within thirty (30) days after the release date of this Citation. or call the Consumer &
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2240A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2240A1.pdf
  • corresponding with the Commission. Under the Privacy Act of 1974, any statement or information provided by you may be used by the Commission to determine if further enforcement action is required. Any knowingly or willfully false statement, or concealment of any material fact, made in reply to this Citation is punishable by fine or imprisonment. Please also note that Section 1.17 of the Rules requires that you provide truthful and accurate statements to the Commission. CONTACT INFORMATION The closest FCC Office is the Seattle Field Office in Kirkland, Washington. You may contact Salomon Satche by telephone, (301) 725-1996, to schedule a personal interview, which must take place within thirty (30) days after the release date of this Citation. You should send
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2295A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2295A1.pdf
  • corresponding with the Commission. Under the Privacy Act of 1974, any statement or information provided by you may be used by the Commission to determine if further enforcement action is required. Any knowingly or willfully false statement, or concealment of any material fact, made in reply to this Citation is punishable by fine or imprisonment. Please also note that Section 1.17 of the Rules requires that you provide truthful and accurate statements to the Commission. CONTACT INFORMATION The closest FCC Office is the Seattle Field Office in Kirkland, Washington. You may contact Salomon Satche by telephone, (301) 725-1996, to schedule a personal interview, which must take place within thirty (30) days after the release date of this Citation. You should send
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-669A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-669A1.pdf
  • 2. See LOI at 3. 47 U.S.C. § 302a(b). 47 C.F.R. § 2.803(a). , as ``[a] device that intentionally generates and emits radio frequency energy by radiation or induction.'' 47 C.F.R. §§ 2.1031-2.1060. 47 C.F.R. § 15.201(b). 47 C.F.R. § 2.803(g). 47 U.S.C. § 333. We note that although the Citation did not specifically address Phonejammer's behavior as a Section 1.17(a)(2) violation, 47 C.F.R. § 1.17(a)(2), the Citation emphasized that evidence gathered from Phonejammer's website clearly contradicted Phonejammer's claim that it did not market its phone jammers to individuals in the United States. Moreover, the Citation noted that Phonejammer failed to attest to the truth and accuracy of the information in its response. We will issue a separate Citation to Phonejammer
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-91A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-91A1.pdf
  • include number of complaints, broken down by category or complaint, e.g., instances of improper access by employees, instances of improper disclosure to individuals not authorized to receive the information, or instances of improper access to online information by individuals not authorized to view the information.] The company represents and warrants that the above certification is consistent with 47. C.F.R. § 1.17 which requires truthful and accurate statements to the Commission. The company also acknowledges that false statements and misrepresentations to the Commission are punishable under Title 18 of the U.S. Code and may subject it to enforcement action. Signed _____________________________ [Signature of an officer, as agent of the carrier] Attachments: Accompanying Statement explaining CPNI procedures Explanation of actions taken against data
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-995A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-995A1.pdf
  • the Bureau is sending letters of inquiry to all licensees that air Fox Television Network programming. We take this step to advance the investigation. It should not be construed as a concession that our initial inquiry to Fox was misdirected. 47 U.S.C. § 154(i). 47 U.S.C. § 154(j). 47 U.S.C. § 403. 47 C.F.R. § 73.1015. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.17. See, e.g., SBC Communications Order, 17 FCC Rcd at 7599-7600 ¶¶ 23-28 (ordering $100,000 forfeiture for egregious and intentional failure to certify the response to a Bureau inquiry); Digital Antenna, Inc., Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture and Order, 23 FCC Rcd 7600, 7602 (Spectrum Enforcement Div., Enf. Bur. 2008) (proposing $11,000 forfeiture for failure to provide a complete response
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1111A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1111A1.pdf
  • corresponding with the Commission. Under the Privacy Act of 1974, any statement or information provided by you may be used by the Commission to determine if further enforcement action is required. Any knowingly or willfully false statement, or concealment of any material fact, made in reply to this Citation is punishable by fine or imprisonment. Please also note that section 1.17 of the Rules requires that you provide truthful and accurate statements to the Commission. CONTACT INFORMATION The closest FCC Office is the New York Office in New York. You may contact Dan Noel by telephone, (212) 337-1865, to schedule a personal interview, which must take place within thirty (30) days after the release date of this Citation. You should send
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1164A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1164A1.pdf
  • with the Commission. Under the Privacy Act of 1974, any statement or information provided by New Generation may be used by the Commission to determine if further enforcement action is required. Any knowingly or willfully false statement, or concealment of any material fact, made in reply to this Citation is punishable by fine or imprisonment. Please also note that section 1.17 of the Rules requires that New Generation provide truthful and accurate statements to the Commission. CONTACT INFORMATION The closest FCC Office is the Detroit Office in Farmington Hills, Michigan. Please contact Celia Lewis by telephone, 202-418-7456, if New Generation wishes to schedule a personal interview. The interview should take place within thirty (30) days after the release date of this
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1165A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1165A1.pdf
  • corresponding with the Commission. Under the Privacy Act of 1974, we also inform Sound Around that the Commission's staff will use all relevant material information before it, including information disclosed in its interview or written statement, to determine if further enforcement action is required to ensure compliance with the Communications Act and the Commission's Rules. Please also note that section 1.17 of the Rules requires that Sound Around provide truthful and accurate statements to the Commission. In addition, the knowing and willful making of any false statement, or the concealment of any material fact, in reply to this Citation is punishable by fine or imprisonment. contact information The closest FCC office is the New York Field Office in New York, New
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-125A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-125A1.pdf
  • corresponding with the Commission. Under the Privacy Act of 1974, any statement or information provided by you may be used by the Commission to determine if further enforcement action is required. Any knowingly or willfully false statement or concealment of any material fact, made in reply to this Citation is punishable by fine or imprisonment. Please also note that section 1.17 of the Rules requires that you provide truthful and accurate statements to the Commission. CONTACT INFORMATION The closest FCC Office is the Los Angeles Field Office, in Cerritos, California. You may contact Samantha Peoples by telephone, 202-418-1101, to schedule a personal interview, which must take place within thirty (30) days after the release date of this Citation. You should send
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-135A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-135A1.pdf
  • corresponding with the Commission. Under the Privacy Act of 1974, any statement or information provided by you may be used by the Commission to determine if further enforcement action is required. Any knowingly or willfully false statement or concealment of any material fact, made in reply to this Citation is punishable by fine or imprisonment. Please also note that section 1.17 of the Rules requires that you provide truthful and accurate statements to the Commission. V. CONTACT INFORMATION The closest FCC office is the New York District Office, in New York, NY. You may contact Jennifer Burton by telephone, 202-418-1160, to schedule a personal interview, which must take place within thirty (30) days after the release date of this Citation. You
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1536A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1536A1.pdf
  • INC. Participant in Auction No. 86 ) ) ) ) ) File No.: EB-11-IH-0734 NAL/Acct. No.: 201232080004 FRN: 0005209374 NOTICE OF APPARENT LIABILITY FOR FORFEITURE Adopted: October 14, 2011 Released: October 14, 2011 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: I. INTRODUCTION In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL''), we find that Vermont Telephone Company, Inc. (``VTel''), apparently violated sections 1.17 and 1.65 of the Commission's rules (``Rules'') by willfully and repeatedly failing to submit accurate revenue information to the Commission and by failing to maintain the continuing accuracy of its application in connection with its participation in Auction No. 86. Based on our review of the facts and circumstances surrounding this matter, and for the reasons discussed below, we find
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-159A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-159A1.pdf
  • the number of complaints, broken down by category or complaint, e.g., instances of improper access by employees, instances of improper disclosure to individuals not authorized to receive the information, or instances of improper access to online information by individuals not authorized to view the information.] The company represents and warrants that the above certification is consistent with 47. C.F.R. § 1.17 which requires truthful and accurate statements to the Commission. The company also acknowledges that false statements and misrepresentations to the Commission are punishable under Title 18 of the U.S. Code and may subject it to enforcement action. Signed _____________________________ [Signature of an officer, as agent of the carrier] Attachments: Accompanying Statement explaining CPNI procedures Explanation of actions taken against data
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1661A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1661A1.pdf
  • the Commission. Under the Privacy Act of 1974, any statement or information provided by an Online Vendor may be used by the Commission to determine if further enforcement action is required. Any knowingly or willfully false statement or concealment of any material fact made in reply to this Citation is punishable by fine or imprisonment. Please also note that section 1.17 of the Rules requires that truthful and accurate statements be provided to the Commission. V. CONTACT INFORMATION For purposes of scheduling a personal interview, the closest FCC office for each Online Vendor is included in Appendix A to this Citation. An Online Vendor may contact the Spectrum Enforcement Division by telephone, 202-418-1160, to schedule an interview, which must take place
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1720A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1720A1.pdf
  • corresponding with the Commission. Under the Privacy Act of 1974, any statement or information provided by you may be used by the Commission to determine if further enforcement action is required. Any knowingly or willfully false statement, or concealment of any material fact, made in reply to this Citation is punishable by fine or imprisonment. Please also note that section 1.17 of the Rules requires that you provide truthful and accurate statements to the Commission. CONTACT INFORMATION The closest FCC Office is the San Juan Office in San Juan, Puerto Rico. Spy Gallery may contact Reuben Jusino by telephone, 787-306-1193, to schedule a personal interview, which must take place within thirty (30) calendar days after the release date of this Citation.
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1786A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1786A1.pdf
  • limits in the future. Under the Privacy Act of 1974, any statement or information provided by you may be used by the Commission to determine if further enforcement action is required. Any knowingly or willfully false statement, or concealment of any material fact, made in reply to this Citation is punishable by fine or imprisonment. Please also note that Section 1.17 of the Rules requires that you provide truthful and accurate statements to the Commission. CONTACT INFORMATION The closest FCC Office is the Seattle Field Office in Kirkland, Washington. You may contact this office by telephone, (360)696-6707, to schedule a personal interview, which must take place within twenty (20) days after the release date of this Citation. All written correspondence should
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1787A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1787A1.pdf
  • limits in the future. Under the Privacy Act of 1974, any statement or information provided by you may be used by the Commission to determine if further enforcement action is required. Any knowingly or willfully false statement, or concealment of any material fact, made in reply to this Citation is punishable by fine or imprisonment. Please also note that Section 1.17 of the Rules requires that you provide truthful and accurate statements to the Commission. CONTACT INFORMATION The closest FCC Office is the Seattle Field Office in Kirkland, Washington. You may contact this office by telephone, (360)696-6707, to schedule a personal interview, which must take place within twenty (20) days after the release date of this Citation. All written correspondence should
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-184A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-184A1.pdf
  • Acting Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau: INTRODUCTION In this Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL''), we find Cricket Communications, Inc. (``Cricket''), licensee of common carrier fixed point-to-point microwave stations, call signs WQJE535, Midway, Kentucky, and WQJF544, Frankfort, Kentucky, apparently liable for a forfeiture in the amount of twenty thousand dollars ($20,000) for willful violation of section 1.17(a)(2) of the Commission's rules (``Rules''). The noted violation involves Cricket's provision of incorrect material factual information to the Commission regarding the construction of station WQJE535 without a reasonable basis for believing that the information was correct and accurate. We also admonish Cricket for operating stations WQJE535 and WQJF544 for seven months prior to obtaining Commission authority in violation of section
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-247A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-247A1.pdf
  • 1934, as amended (``Communications Act''), to Share Enterprises Unlimited, Inc. (``Share'') for marketing unauthorized radio frequency devices in the United States in violation of section 302(b) of the Communications Act, and section 2.803 of the Commission's rules (``Rules''), and for providing incorrect, material factual information to the Spectrum Enforcement Division (``Division'') of the Enforcement Bureau (``Bureau'') in violation of section 1.17(a)(2) of the Rules. Share should take immediate steps to come into compliance and to avoid any recurrence of this misconduct. As explained below and as provided in the Communications Act, future violations of the Rules in this regard may subject your company to substantial monetary penalties, seizure of equipment, and criminal sanctions. We also direct Share to supplement its response
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-248A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-248A1.pdf
  • corresponding with the Commission. Under the Privacy Act of 1974, any statement or information provided by you may be used by the Commission to determine if further enforcement action is required. Any knowingly or willfully false statement or concealment of any material fact, made in reply to this Citation is punishable by fine or imprisonment. Please also note that section 1.17 of the Rules requires that you provide truthful and accurate statements to the Commission. Contact Information The closest FCC Office is the Seattle District Office, in Kirkland, Washington. Please call Katherine Power at 202-418-0919 if you wish to schedule a personal interview, which must take place within thirty (30) days after the release of this Citation. You should send any
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-408A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-408A1.pdf
  • corresponding with the Commission. Under the Privacy Act of 1974, any statement or information provided by you may be used by the Commission to determine if further enforcement action is required. Any knowingly or willfully false statement, or concealment of any material fact, made in reply to this Citation is punishable by fine or imprisonment. Please also note that section 1.17 of the rules requires that you provide truthful and accurate statements to the Commission. CONTACT INFORMATION The closest FCC Office is the Los Angeles Office in Cerritos, California. You may contact the Los Angeles Office by telephone, (562) 860-7474, to schedule a personal interview, which must take place within thirty (30) days after the release date of this Citation. or
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-47A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-47A1.pdf
  • limits in the future. Under the Privacy Act of 1974, any statement or information provided by you may be used by the Commission to determine if further enforcement action is required. Any knowingly or willfully false statement, or concealment of any material fact, made in reply to this Citation is punishable by fine or imprisonment. Please also note that Section 1.17 of the Rules requires that you provide truthful and accurate statements to the Commission. CONTACT INFORMATION The closest FCC Office is the Seattle Field Office in Kirkland, Washington. You may contact this office by telephone, (360)696-6707, to schedule a personal interview, which must take place within twenty (20) days after the release date of this Citation. All written correspondence should
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-500A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-500A1.pdf
  • for further information about the nondiscrimination certification requirement. Issued by: Chief, Enforcement Bureau -FCC- . See Promoting Diversification of Ownership in the Broadcasting Services, Report and Order and Third Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, 23 FCC Rcd 5922, 5940 ¶ 40 (2008). See id. at 5941 ¶ 49. See id. . See 47 U.S.C. § 309(k). See 47 C.F.R. § 1.17. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.65 (applicants have a continuing obligation to advise the FCC, through amendments, of any substantial and material changes in the information furnished in this application). PUBLIC NOTICE of 2 PUBLIC NOTICE FCC ENFORCEMENT ADVISORY Federal Communications Commission 445 12th St., S.W. Washington, D.C. 20554 News Media Information 202 / 418-0500 Internet: http://www.fcc.gov TTY: 1-888-835-5322 News Media
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-550A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-550A1.pdf
  • corresponding with the Commission. Under the Privacy Act of 1974, any statement or information provided by you may be used by the Commission to determine if further enforcement action is required. Any knowingly or willfully false statement, or concealment of any material fact, made in reply to this Citation is punishable by fine or imprisonment. Please also note that section 1.17 of the Rules requires that you provide truthful and accurate statements to the Commission. CONTACT INFORMATION The closest FCC Office is the Atlanta Field Office in Duluth, GA. You may contact this office by telephone, (770)935-3370, to schedule a personal interview, which must take place within twenty (20) days after the release date of this Citation. or call the Consumer
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-5A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-5A1.pdf
  • corresponding with the Commission. Under the Privacy Act of 1974, any statement or information provided by you may be used by the Commission to determine if further enforcement action is required. Any knowingly or willfully false statement, or concealment of any material fact, made in reply to this Citation is punishable by fine or imprisonment. Please also note that Section 1.17 of the Rules requires that you provide truthful and accurate statements to the Commission. CONTACT INFORMATION The closest FCC Office is the Detroit Office in Farmington Hills, Michigan. You may contact James Bridgewater by telephone, (248) 471-5661, to schedule a personal interview, which must take place within thirty (30) days after the release date of this Citation. You should send
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-623A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-623A1.pdf
  • 2011) (Reply). Petition at iii. 47 C.F.R. § 101.103(d). See Petition at 6-7. Response at 1. Id. Id. At the time Micronet submitted the Health Departments applications, Comsearch had already put Micronet on notice that the Port Authority considered its license to be active. See Petition, Exhibit 2 (Letter, David L. Wiggens to Brad Youngblood (Nov. 29, 2010)). . Section 1.17(a)(2) of the Commission's rules states that no person may provide, in any written statement of fact, ``material factual information that is incorrect or omit material information that is necessary to prevent any material factual statement that is made from being incorrect or misleading without a reasonable basis for believing that any such material factual statement is correct and not misleading.
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-704A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-704A1.pdf
  • corresponding with the Commission. Under the Privacy Act of 1974, any statement or information provided by you may be used by the Commission to determine if further enforcement action is required. Any knowingly or willfully false statement, or concealment of any material fact, made in reply to this Citation is punishable by fine or imprisonment. Please also note that section 1.17 of the Rules requires that you provide truthful and accurate statements to the Commission. CONTACT INFORMATION The closest FCC Office is the Philadelphia Office in Langhorne, Pennsylvania. You may contact Gene Stanbro by telephone, (215) 741-3016, to schedule a personal interview, which must take place within thirty (30) days after the release date of this Citation. You should send any
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-812A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-812A1.pdf
  • corresponding with the Commission. Under the Privacy Act of 1974, any statement or information provided by you may be used by the Commission to determine if further enforcement action is required. Any knowingly or willfully false statement, or concealment of any material fact, made in reply to this Citation is punishable by fine or imprisonment. Please also note that section 1.17 of the Rules requires that you provide truthful and accurate statements to the Commission. CONTACT INFORMATION The closest FCC office is the New York District Office in New York, NY. You may contact Karen Mercer by telephone, (202) 418-1160, to schedule a personal interview, which must take place within thirty (30) calendar days after the release date of this Citation.
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-924A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-924A1.pdf
  • corresponding with the Commission. Under the Privacy Act of 1974, any statement or information provided by you may be used by the Commission to determine if further enforcement action is required. Any knowingly or willfully false statement, or concealment of any material fact, made in reply to this Citation is punishable by fine or imprisonment. Please also note that section 1.17 of the Rules requires that you provide truthful and accurate statements to the Commission. CONTACT INFORMATION The closest FCC Office is the Atlanta District Office in Atlanta, Georgia. Pyong Kon Eun may contact Salomon Satche by telephone, 301-725-1996, to schedule a personal interview, which must take place within Thirty (30) calendar days after the release date of this Citation. You
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-984A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-984A1.pdf
  • corresponding with the Commission. Under the Privacy Act of 1974, any statement or information provided by you may be used by the Commission to determine if further enforcement action is required. Any knowingly or willfully false statement, or concealment of any material fact, made in reply to this Citation is punishable by fine or imprisonment. Please also note that section 1.17 of the Rules requires that you provide truthful and accurate statements to the Commission. CONTACT INFORMATION The closest FCC office is the Chicago District Office in Park Ridge, Illinois. You may contact James M. Roop by telephone, 847-813-4660, to schedule a personal interview, which must take place within thirty (30) days after the release date of this Citation. You should
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-98A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-98A1.pdf
  • corresponding with the Commission. Under the Privacy Act of 1974, any statement or information provided by you may be used by the Commission to determine if further enforcement action is required. Any knowingly or willfully false statement, or concealment of any material fact, made in reply to this Citation is punishable by fine or imprisonment. Please also note that Section 1.17 of the Rules requires that you provide truthful and accurate statements to the Commission. CONTACT INFORMATION The closest FCC Office is the Seattle Field Office in Kirkland, Washington. You may contact Salomon Satche by telephone, (301) 725-1996, to schedule a personal interview, which must take place within thirty (30) days after the release date of this Citation. You should send
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-170A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-170A1.pdf
  • the number of complaints, broken down by category or complaint, e.g., instances of improper access by employees, instances of improper disclosure to individuals not authorized to receive the information, or instances of improper access to online information by individuals not authorized to view the information.] The company represents and warrants that the above certification is consistent with 47. C.F.R. § 1.17 which requires truthful and accurate statements to the Commission. The company also acknowledges that false statements and misrepresentations to the Commission are punishable under Title 18 of the U.S. Code and may subject it to enforcement action. Signed _____________________________ [Signature of an officer, as agent of the carrier] Attachments: Accompanying Statement explaining CPNI procedures Explanation of actions taken against data
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-64A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-64A1.pdf
  • Media Designer, Clear Channel Los Angeles. See LOI Response at Exhibit K and Further LOI Response at Exhibit 2. See LOI Response at 4 and Application of WorldCom, Inc. and MCI Communications Corporation for Transfer of Control of MCI Communications Corporation to Worldcom, Inc., Memorandum Opinion and Order, 13 FCC Rcd 18025, 18134 ¶ 193 (1998) (citing 47 C.F.R. § 1.17 for proposition that, in light of their duty to be truthful and accurate in their representations to the Commission, statements provided by Commission licensees in response to investigatory or adjudicatory matters within the Commission's jurisdiction are awarded substantial weight in the absence of persuasive evidence to the contrary). See The Commission's Forfeiture Policy Statement and Amendment of Section 1.80 of
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-679A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-679A1.pdf
  • corresponding with the Commission. Under the Privacy Act of 1974, any statement or information provided by you may be used by the Commission to determine if further enforcement action is required. Any knowingly or willfully false statement, or concealment of any material fact, made in reply to this Citation is punishable by fine or imprisonment. Please also note that Section 1.17 of the Rules requires that you provide truthful and accurate statements to the Commission. V. CONTACT INFORMATION The closest FCC Office is the Atlanta Office in Atlanta, Georgia. North Chapel may contact Douglas Miller by telephone, (770) 935-3370, to schedule a personal interview, which must take place within thirty (30) calendar days after the release date of this Citation. You
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-931A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-931A1.pdf
  • Released: June 14, 2012 By the Resident Agent, Houston Office, South Central Region, Enforcement Bureau: INTRODUCTION In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (NAL), we find Vision Latina Broadcasting, Inc. (Vision Latina Broadcasting), licensee of Station KBPO, Port Neches, Texas, apparently liable for a forfeiture in the amount of twenty five thousand dollars ($25,000) for willful violation of Section 1.17(a)(2) of the Commission's rules (Rules). The noted violation involves Vision Latina Broadcasting's provision of incorrect factual information of a material nature to the Commission regarding Station KBPO's public inspection file without a reasonable basis for believing that the information was correct and accurate. BACKGROUND On December 9, 2010, during regular business hours, an agent from the Enforcement Bureau's Houston Office
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-313017A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-313017A1.pdf
  • III(B) - page 10) TIME OF DAY VIOLATION (See Attachment A, section IV - page 11) CALLER IDENTIFICATION VIOLATION (See Attachment A, section V - page 12) If, after receipt of this citation, you or your company again violates section 227 of the Act or sections 64.1200, 64.1601(e), or 68.318 of the Commission's rules in any manner or violates section 1.17 of our rules (discussed below) when responding to this citation, the Commission may impose monetary forfeitures not to exceed $16,000 for each such violation or each day of a continuing violation. RESPONDING TO THE CITATION You may respond to this citation within 30 days from the date of this letter either through (1) a written statement, (2) a teleconference interview
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-313019A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-313019A1.pdf
  • III(B) - page 10) TIME OF DAY VIOLATION (See Attachment A, section IV - page 11) CALLER IDENTIFICATION VIOLATION (See Attachment A, section V - page 12) If, after receipt of this citation, you or your company again violates section 227 of the Act or sections 64.1200, 64.1601(e), or 68.318 of the Commission's rules in any manner or violates section 1.17 of our rules (discussed below) when responding to this citation, the Commission may impose monetary forfeitures not to exceed $16,000 for each such violation or each day of a continuing violation. RESPONDING TO THE CITATION You may respond to this citation within 30 days from the date of this letter either through (1) a written statement, (2) a teleconference interview
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-313020A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-313020A1.pdf
  • III(B) - page 10) TIME OF DAY VIOLATION (See Attachment A, section IV - page 11) CALLER IDENTIFICATION VIOLATION (See Attachment A, section V - page 12) If, after receipt of this citation, you or your company again violates section 227 of the Act or sections 64.1200, 64.1601(e), or 68.318 of the Commission's rules in any manner or violates section 1.17 of our rules (discussed below) when responding to this citation, the Commission may impose monetary forfeitures not to exceed $16,000 for each such violation or each day of a continuing violation. RESPONDING TO THE CITATION You may respond to this citation within 30 days from the date of this letter either through (1) a written statement, (2) a teleconference interview
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-313021A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-313021A1.pdf
  • III(B) - page 10) TIME OF DAY VIOLATION (See Attachment A, section IV - page 11) CALLER IDENTIFICATION VIOLATION (See Attachment A, section V - page 12) If, after receipt of this citation, you or your company again violates section 227 of the Act or sections 64.1200, 64.1601(e), or 68.318 of the Commission's rules in any manner or violates section 1.17 of our rules (discussed below) when responding to this citation, the Commission may impose monetary forfeitures not to exceed $16,000 for each such violation or each day of a continuing violation. RESPONDING TO THE CITATION You may respond to this citation within 30 days from the date of this letter either through (1) a written statement, (2) a teleconference interview
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-313022A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-313022A1.pdf
  • III(B) - page 10) TIME OF DAY VIOLATION (See Attachment A, section IV - page 11) CALLER IDENTIFICATION VIOLATION (See Attachment A, section V - page 12) If, after receipt of this citation, you or your company again violates section 227 of the Act or sections 64.1200, 64.1601(e), or 68.318 of the Commission's rules in any manner or violates section 1.17 of our rules (discussed below) when responding to this citation, the Commission may impose monetary forfeitures not to exceed $16,000 for each such violation or each day of a continuing violation. RESPONDING TO THE CITATION You may respond to this citation within 30 days from the date of this letter either through (1) a written statement, (2) a teleconference interview
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-313023A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-313023A1.pdf
  • III(B) - page 10) TIME OF DAY VIOLATION (See Attachment A, section IV - page 11) CALLER IDENTIFICATION VIOLATION (See Attachment A, section V - page 12) If, after receipt of this citation, you or your company again violates section 227 of the Act or sections 64.1200, 64.1601(e), or 68.318 of the Commission's rules in any manner or violates section 1.17 of our rules (discussed below) when responding to this citation, the Commission may impose monetary forfeitures not to exceed $16,000 for each such violation or each day of a continuing violation. RESPONDING TO THE CITATION You may respond to this citation within 30 days from the date of this letter either through (1) a written statement, (2) a teleconference interview
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-313024A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-313024A1.pdf
  • III(B) - page 10) TIME OF DAY VIOLATION (See Attachment A, section IV - page 11) CALLER IDENTIFICATION VIOLATION (See Attachment A, section V - page 12) If, after receipt of this citation, you or your company again violates section 227 of the Act or sections 64.1200, 64.1601(e), or 68.318 of the Commission's rules in any manner or violates section 1.17 of our rules (discussed below) when responding to this citation, the Commission may impose monetary forfeitures not to exceed $16,000 for each such violation or each day of a continuing violation. RESPONDING TO THE CITATION You may respond to this citation within 30 days from the date of this letter either through (1) a written statement, (2) a teleconference interview
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-313025A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-313025A1.pdf
  • III(B) - page 10) TIME OF DAY VIOLATION (See Attachment A, section IV - page 11) CALLER IDENTIFICATION VIOLATION (See Attachment A, section V - page 12) If, after receipt of this citation, you or your company again violates section 227 of the Act or sections 64.1200, 64.1601(e), or 68.318 of the Commission's rules in any manner or violates section 1.17 of our rules (discussed below) when responding to this citation, the Commission may impose monetary forfeitures not to exceed $16,000 for each such violation or each day of a continuing violation. RESPONDING TO THE CITATION You may respond to this citation within 30 days from the date of this letter either through (1) a written statement, (2) a teleconference interview
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-313028A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-313028A1.pdf
  • III(B) - page 10) TIME OF DAY VIOLATION (See Attachment A, section IV - page 11) CALLER IDENTIFICATION VIOLATION (See Attachment A, section V - page 12) If, after receipt of this citation, you or your company again violates section 227 of the Act or sections 64.1200, 64.1601(e), or 68.318 of the Commission's rules in any manner or violates section 1.17 of our rules (discussed below) when responding to this citation, the Commission may impose monetary forfeitures not to exceed $16,000 for each such violation or each day of a continuing violation. RESPONDING TO THE CITATION You may respond to this citation within 30 days from the date of this letter either through (1) a written statement, (2) a teleconference interview
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-313029A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-313029A1.pdf
  • III(B) - page 10) TIME OF DAY VIOLATION (See Attachment A, section IV - page 11) CALLER IDENTIFICATION VIOLATION (See Attachment A, section V - page 12) If, after receipt of this citation, you or your company again violates section 227 of the Act or sections 64.1200, 64.1601(e), or 68.318 of the Commission's rules in any manner or violates section 1.17 of our rules (discussed below) when responding to this citation, the Commission may impose monetary forfeitures not to exceed $16,000 for each such violation or each day of a continuing violation. RESPONDING TO THE CITATION You may respond to this citation within 30 days from the date of this letter either through (1) a written statement, (2) a teleconference interview
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-313030A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-313030A1.pdf
  • III(B) - page 10) TIME OF DAY VIOLATION (See Attachment A, section IV - page 11) CALLER IDENTIFICATION VIOLATION (See Attachment A, section V - page 12) If, after receipt of this citation, you or your company again violates section 227 of the Act or sections 64.1200, 64.1601(e), or 68.318 of the Commission's rules in any manner or violates section 1.17 of our rules (discussed below) when responding to this citation, the Commission may impose monetary forfeitures not to exceed $16,000 for each such violation or each day of a continuing violation. RESPONDING TO THE CITATION You may respond to this citation within 30 days from the date of this letter either through (1) a written statement, (2) a teleconference interview
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-100A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-100A1.pdf
  • for Forfeiture (``NAL'') proposing a $1,000,000 forfeiture against Behringer for its apparent willful and repeated violation of the equipment marketing restrictions and related requirements. Specifically, the NAL found that since January 2000, Behringer has imported and marketed in the United States 66 models of unauthorized digital audio music devices. Between January 2000 and March 2004, Behringer imported and distributed approximately 1.17 million such devices for sale in the United States. The NAL further found that between April 2004 and February 2005 Behringer continued to import and market unauthorized devices, even though it had previously represented to the Enforcement Bureau in response to the first letter of inquiry (``LOI'') that it had initiated compliance measures. In this regard, during the one-year period
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-125A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-125A1.pdf
  • approval would have been required under Section 310(d) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended and Section 1.948 of the Commission's Rules. Questions about the corporate composition of PCSI and whether control of the company was transferred without prior Commission consent require further inquiry at hearing, as specified in the Ordering Clauses below. Misrepresentation and Lack of Candor Section 1.17 of the Commission's Rules prohibits misrepresentations and lack of candor in Commission filings. ``The bedrock requirement for absolute truth and candor from a Commission licensee or from a licensee or applicant is, simply stated, this agency's quintessential regulatory demand.'' Material misrepresentations to the Commission or an intentional lack of candor with respect to matters affecting an applicant's basic eligibility status
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-132A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-132A1.pdf
  • adopted a benchmark approach for Personal Communications Service (PCS), it stated: ``Licensees must file maps and other supporting documents showing compliance with the respective construction requirements within the appropriate five- and ten-year benchmarks of the date of their initial licenses.'' 47 C.F.R. § 24.203(c). See, e.g., Cellular South 700 MHz Further Notice Comments at 5. See, e.g., 47 C.F.R. § 1.17 (Truthful and accurate statements to the Commission); 47 C.F.R. § 1.917 (``Willful false statements made therein, however, are punishable by fine and imprisonment, 18 U.S.C. 1001, and by appropriate administrative sanctions, including revocation of station license pursuant to 312(a)(1) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended.''). We decline to adopt the suggestion from RTG that we define a bright
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-175A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-175A1.pdf
  • apply in such circumstances, and it seeks a declaration that Farmers' tariffed rates are ``void ab initio,'' thereby entitling Qwest to a damages award. We decline to rule as Qwest requests. As an initial matter, Qwest contends that factual statements Farmers made to the Commission in support of its tariff filing were ``incorrect'' and/or ``misleading,'' in violation of Commission rule 1.17(a)(1) and (2), because Farmers failed to disclose its purported plan to increase interstate access volumes. Under the Commission's rules, Farmers was required to report its historical cost and demand figures, which the Commission determined are ``likely to be a close and unbiased substitute for prospective data.'' In fact, the Commission specifically declined to include a requirement that carriers provide any
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-109A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-109A1.pdf
  • reception capability. In addition, we propose a forfeiture in the amount of eleven thousand dollars ($11,000) against Syntax-Brillian for providing to the Commission, during the course of staff's investigation of its violations of the DTV tuner requirement, material factual information that is incorrect without a reasonable basis for believing the material factual information was correct, in willful violation of Section 1.17(a)(2) of the Rules. background The Commission adopted the DTV reception capability requirement in 2002. That requirement, which also is often termed the ``DTV tuner requirement,'' requires that all new television broadcast receivers that are imported into the United States or shipped in interstate commerce be capable of receiving the signals of DTV broadcast stations over-the-air. The DTV tuner requirement was
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-163A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-163A1.pdf
  • Forfeiture (``NAL'') by the Commission against Funai for possible violations of Section 330(c) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, (``Act''), Section 15.120(d)(2) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''), regarding Funai's apparent interstate shipment, after March 15, 2006, of digital television receivers that do not comply with the Commission's rules regarding program blocking technology requirements for televisions receivers, and Section 1.17 of the Rules regarding Funai's apparent inaccurate statements to the Commission. The Commission and Funai have negotiated the terms of the Consent Decree that resolve this matter. A copy of the Consent Decree is attached hereto and incorporated by reference. After reviewing the terms of the Consent Decree and evaluating the facts before us, we find that the public interest
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-187A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-187A1.pdf
  • not comply with the Commission's rules regarding digital television (``DTV'') reception capability. Additionally, we find Invision apparently liable for a forfeiture in the amount of $4,000 for providing to the Commission, during the course of its investigation, material factual information that is incorrect without a reasonable basis for believing the material factual information was correct, in willful violation of Section 1.17(a)(2) of the Rules. In light of evidence that the company has continued to import and ship interstate television receivers in violation of our rules, we further order Invision to submit a report within 10 days of release of this NAL certifying that it has ceased all such unlawful conduct. Background The Commission adopted the DTV reception capability requirement in 2002.
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-230A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-230A1.pdf
  • continue requiring the NSA to include a detailed build-out schedule that is consistent with the performance benchmarks and requirements that we propose above. See, e.g., 47 C.F.R. § 1.946. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.946(d) (``The notification must be filed with Commission within 15 days of the expiration of the applicable construction or coverage period.''). See, e.g., 47 C.F. R. § 1.17 (Truthful and accurate statements to the Commission); 47 C.F.R. § 1.917 (``Willful false statements made therein, however, are punishable by fine and imprisonment, 18 U.S.C. 1001, and by appropriate administrative sanctions, including revocation of station license pursuant to 312(a)(1) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended.''). See, e.g., AASHTO Comments at 11; APCO Comments at 30; Council Tree Comments
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-252A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-252A1.pdf
  • the ``Percent of interest held'' field and that ``an incorrect figure was inadvertently entered in that field.'' Application for Review at 4. We remind Evangelism that it is required to use due diligence in providing correct and non-misleading information to the Commission, including taking steps to determine the truthfulness of what is being submitted. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 73.1015 and 1.17. We caution Evangelism that a failure to submit truthful and accurate statements to the Commission pursuant to Section 73.1015 of the Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 73.1015, could lead to the imposition of a monetary forfeiture pursuant to 47 U.S.C. § 503(b), license revocation pursuant to 47 U.S.C. § 312 and/or criminal sanctions under 18 U.S.C. § 1001. In relying on
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-319A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-319A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-319A1.txt
  • 1993, the date of our Sunshine Notice on the Report and Order [PCP Exclusivity Order], as the cutoff date for slow growth eligibility, and to deny slow growth extensions to grandfathered licensees generally. . . . We believe that the date for dividing `old' from `new' applicants also is the appropriate date for triggering slow growth eligibility.'') 47 C.F.R. § 1.17. Federal Communications Commission DA 00-319 ˆ ‰ ë ì í î í í î é í
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-418A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-418A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-418A1.txt
  • available to the public or transient users of its premises, for interstate telephone calls using a provider of operator services.''). 47 U.S.C. § 226(c). 47 U.S.C. § 226(b). Second Amended Complaint at ¶¶ 18-22. Id. at ¶¶ 22, 25-26. 47 U.S.C. § 201(b). Second Amended Complaint at ¶¶ 27-28. Id. at ¶¶ 29-31. Complainants allege that PetroCom therefore violated section 1.17 of the Commission's rules, which requires truthful statements before the Commission. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.17. See 47 U.S.C. § 208; see also Directel, Inc. v. American Tel. & Tel. Co., Memorandum Opinion and Order, 11 FCC Rcd 7554, 7560 (1996); Amendment of Rules Governing Procedures To Be Followed When Formal Complaints Are Filed Against Common Carriers, Report and Order,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-87A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-87A5.txt
  • 0.70 0.61 1.73 1.71 1.50 2.55 2.52 2.23 Germany 1.00 0.99 1.01 1.71 1.69 1.72 2.61 2.58 2.63 Greece n/a 1.81 n/a n/a 1.81 n/a n/a 2.59 n/a Italy 1.54 1.51 1.00 2.52 2.47 1.60 n/a n/a 2.30 Ireland n/a 2.20 1.00 n/a 4.15 1.60 n/a 5.18 2.26 Luxembourg n/a 2.01 2.25 n/a 2.01 2.25 n/a 2.01 2.25 Netherlands 2.00 1.17 1.00 2.00 1.60 1.41 2.52 2.06 1.70 Portugal n/a 1.20 0.99 n/a 2.37 1.63 n/a 18.00 2.58 Spain 1.51 1.49 0.99 1.51 1.49 1.59 4.22 4.17 3.07 Sweden 1.68 1.14 0.86 2.15 1.77 1.16 2.98 2.41 1.59 U.K. 0.64 0.61 0.62 0.91 0.87 0.90 1.74 1.69 1.27 Attachment 4 EU interconnection rates U.S. Cents per minute at peak rates Local
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1092A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1092A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1092A1.txt
  • 420 kHz (channel 1621) be re-allocated to distress and safety only (i.e., remove the calling function). Removal of the calling function would require vessels to increase their monitoring capabilities (e.g., monitor distress channels and calling channels). (February 6, 2001) U.S. VIEW: Radio Conference Subcommittee (RCS) Preparation for ITU Radiocommunication Conferences DRAFT UNITED STATES PRELIMINARY VIEWS ON WRC-03 WRC-2003 Agenda Item 1.17: to consider upgrading the allocation to the radiolocation service in the frequency range 2 900-3 100 MHz to primary; ISSUE: Obtaining sufficient primary spectrum for radiolocation in the range 2 900-3 400 MHz to support expanding radiolocation operations; sharing between radiolocation and incumbent services - radiolocation and radionavigation. BACKGROUND: WRC-97 (Resolution 722) first considered the possibility of an allocation upgrade
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1187A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1187A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1187A1.txt
  • response may result in the imposition of administrative sanctions. Nextel may provide any additional information that it believes is relevant to this matter, and shall direct its response to: Jennifer Tomchin Federal Communications Commission Policy Division Wireless Telecommunications Bureau 445 12th Street, S.W., Room 3-C122 Washington, D.C. 20554 Nextel is advised that 18 U.S.C. § 1001 and 47 C.F.R. § 1.17 prohibit misrepresentations and/or willful omissions of material facts in response to Commission inquiries. We intend to make the information submitted available to the public, to assist in effective review of the Phase II process. These materials provide information about the degree to which certain location technologies are capable of meeting the Commission's standards for E911 Phase II implementation. Public disclosure
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1188A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1188A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1188A1.txt
  • response may result in the imposition of administrative sanctions. AT&T may provide any additional information that it believes is relevant to this matter, and shall direct its response to: Jennifer Tomchin Federal Communications Commission Policy Division Wireless Telecommunications Bureau 445 12th Street, S.W., Room 3-C122 Washington, D.C. 20554 AT&T is advised that 18 U.S.C. § 1001 and 47 C.F.R. § 1.17 prohibit misrepresentations and/or willful omissions of material facts in response to Commission inquiries. ACCORDINGLY, AT&T's request for confidentiality contained in its April 4, 2001 letter IS DENIED, to the extent indicated herein. Any application for review of this ruling must be filed within five business days of the date of this Order. 47 C.F.R. § 0.459(g). Third party owners of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1188A1_Erratum.doc
  • response may result in the imposition of administrative sanctions. AT&T may provide any additional information that it believes is relevant to this matter, and shall direct its response to: Jennifer Tomchin Federal Communications Commission Policy Division Wireless Telecommunications Bureau 445 12th Street, S.W., Room 3-C122 Washington, D.C. 20554 AT&T is advised that 18 U.S.C. § 1001 and 47 C.F.R. § 1.17 prohibit misrepresentations and/or willful omissions of material facts in response to Commission inquiries. ACCORDINGLY, AT&T's request for confidentiality contained in its April 4, 2001 letter IS DENIED, to the extent indicated herein. Any application for review of this ruling must be filed within five business days of the date of this Order. 47 C.F.R. § 0.459(g). Third party owners of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1415A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1415A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1415A1.txt
  • 5384 (1995). Opposition at 2. Petition for Special Relief at 3. Petition at 4. Comcast points out that this is not the first time KRPV has misrepresented the record or leveled unsubstantiated charges against Comcast in this proceeding. Accordingly, Comcast contends that the Bureau should consider imposing appropriate sanctions against KRPV, including an award of attorney's fees. See 47 C.F.R. §1.17. See e.g., Dynamic Cablevision of Florida, Ltd., 12 FCC Rcd 9952, 9954 & 9957 (1997); Comcast Cable of Santa Maria, Inc., 13 FCC Rcd 24192, 24197 (1998); Adelphia Cable Partners, L.P., 13 FCC Rcd 4047, 4056 (1997); and Rifkin/Narrangansett of South Florida, 11 FCC Rcd 21090, 21105 (1996). See e.g., WWIZ, Inc., 37 FCC 685, 686 (1964), aff'd sub nom.,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1575A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1575A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1575A1.txt
  • www.fcc.gov/wtb/plmrs/audit.html. Action by the Chief, Public Safety and Private Wireless Division, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau. - FCC - In this case, the call signs listed on each letter will be different. Therefore, a licensee must respond to each letter sent by the Commission in order to account for all of its call signs that are part of the audit. See Sections 1.17 and 1.80 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.17, 1.80. See also, 47 U.S.C. Section 503(b). See 47 U.S.C. Section 503(b); 47 C.F.R. Section 1.80. PUBLIC NOTICE Federal Communications Commission 445 12th St., S.W. Washington, D.C. 20554 News Media Information 202 / 418-0500 Fax-On-Demand 202 / 418-2830 TTY 202 / 418-2555 Internet: http://www.fcc.gov ftp.fcc.gov � „Ð ›ëÿ‰PNG RRµ~Rªnð |ƒoð
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2482A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2482A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2482A1.txt
  • transaction under Section 310(b)(4). We strongly caution the Applicants, and all parties seeking relief under Section 310(b)(4), to ensure that their filings include comprehensive and detailed information concerning the above-described types of voting and equity interests held by non-U.S. interest holders. Indeed, we are concerned that the Applicants may have violated one or more of the Commission's rules, including section 1.17. Accordingly, we are referring this matter to the Enforcement Bureau for further investigation. Based on our review of the new information, we amend the Order and Authorization to approve the additional foreign ownership interests that will be held directly by the twelve named institutional investors in SES Global (20.29 percent equity and 16.98 percent voting) as the result of the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-852A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-852A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-852A1.txt
  • instructions clearly state that the person signing the form is subject to sections 502 and 503(b) of Title 47 of the United States Code, which provide penalties for willful violations of the Commission's rules. Form 471; Instructions for Completing the Schools and Libraries Universal Service Services Ordered and Certification Form (FCC Form 471) (December 1998). See also 47 C.F.R. § 1.17 (requiring truthfulness in statements and documents filed before the Commission). See Schwarts Letter. USAC Letter at 2. BTCS Form 471. FCC Form 471 at Item 22. See BTCS Form 471; Form 470 from Bethlehem Temple Christian School to Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company. (continued....) Federal Communications Commission DA 01-852 Federal Communications Commission DA 01-852 Ä Å �
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1722A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1722A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1722A1.txt
  • Announces Commencement of an Audit of the Construction and Operational Status of Private Land Mobile Radio Stations, Public Notice, 16 FCC Rcd 14264 (WTB 2001) (station construction and operation audit of PLMR licensees below 512 MHz). Licensees must provide true and complete responses, and may be subject to sanctions for misrepresentations or willful omissions. See id. n.2; 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.17, 1.80. See also 47 U.S.C. § 503(b). Reply to Response to Information Request filed by Futronics, Inc. (Mar. 1, 2002) (Reply to Response). Futronics argues that the Midport and GRH response letter was incomplete and inconsistent with previous statements. Futronics also alleges that the response letter demonstrates that Midport and GRH's applications were void ab initio, that the stations were
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2152A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2152A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2152A1.txt
  • to quickly seek agency approval to implement simple accounting rate changes. The rule also enables the Commission to monitor the international accounting rates of carriers to ensure consistency with agency policies and the public interest. Legal Basis: 47 USC §§ 154, 201, 211. Section Number and Title: 64.1001 International settlements policy and modification requests. Rule Year Added Bureau or Office 1.17 1990 EB 1.65(c) 1990, 1991 EB 1.80(a)(4), (b)(3) 1990 EB 1.791 1990 CCB 1.824 1991 MMB 1.931(a) 1991 WTB attachments SUBPART I - PROCEDURES IMPLEMENTING THE NATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY ACT OF 1969 Brief Description: These rules implement the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969, including actions that may have a significant impact on the environment and require the preparation of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2512A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2512A2.txt
  • or information as described in (a) through (e) above and comparable State laws. 1.14 "FBI" means the Federal Bureau of Investigation. 1.15 "Foreign" where used in this Agreement, whether capitalized or lower case, means non- U.S. 1.16 "Forstmann Little" means Forstmann Little & Co. Equity Partnership-VII, L.P. and Forstmann Little & Co. Subordinated Debt and Equity Management Buyout Partnership-VIII, L.P. 1.17 "Governmental Authority" or "Governmental Authorities" means any government, or any governmental, administrative, or regulatory entity, authority, commission, board, agency, instrumentality, bureau or political subdivision and any court, tribunal, judicial or arbitral body. VA01 /GRIFJ/20093.12 1.18 "Hosting Services" means Web hosting (whether shared or dedicated, and including design, server management, maintenance and telecommunications services), Web site traffic management, electronic commerce, streamed
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2751A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2751A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2751A1.txt
  • we fail to provide you with this notice. This collection has been assigned an OMB control number of 3060-0893. THE FOREGOING NOTICE IS REQUIRED BY THE PAPERWORK REDUCTION ACT OF 1995, PUBLIC LAW 104-13, OCTOBER 1, 1995, 44 U.S.C. § 3507. By the Chief, Public Safety and Private Wireless Division, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau - FCC - See 47 C.F.R. § 1.17. License status refers to the current state of the authorization, e.g. licensed, cancelled or forfeited. The latest license status date refers to the date of the last construction certification or the date of cancellation or forfeiture. Renewal expiration date refers to the date the license expires absent the filing of a timely renewal application. Applies to Table C and D
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2752A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2752A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2752A1.txt
  • we fail to provide you with this notice. This collection has been assigned an OMB control number of 3060-0893. THE FOREGOING NOTICE IS REQUIRED BY THE PAPERWORK REDUCTION ACT OF 1995, PUBLIC LAW 104-13, OCTOBER 1, 1995, 44 U.S.C. § 3507. By the Chief, Public Safety and Private Wireless Division, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau - FCC - See 47 C.F.R. § 1.17. Filing dates are determined by the first filing date of a legal proceeding. For example, if the following were filed for a legal proceeding: January 2, 2000 (petition to deny), February 1, 2000 (opposition to the petition to deny), February 10, 2000 (reply) and January 4, 2001 (supplement to the reply); January 2, 2000 would be the filing date. See
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2794A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2794A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2794A1.txt
  • at 2-3; Thomas Petition at 2-3. Francis Petition at 2-4; Thomas Petition at 2-4. 47 U.S.C. § 405. 47 C.F.R. § 1.106. See Astroline Communications Company Limited Partnership v. FCC, 857 F. 2d 1556, 1561 & n.4 (D.C. Cir. 1988). Id. Id. Id. High Sierra Broadcasting, Inc., Decision, 96 FCC 2d 423, 427 (Rev. Bd. 1983). See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.17 (misrepresentation or willful omission is prohibited in any written statement to the Commission), 1.923(a) (applications must contain all information requested on the form or by applicable rule). See FCC File No. 0000741018, Schedule H, questions 1 and 2. See FCC File Nos. 0000795756 and 000796262, Schedule H, questions 1 and 2. (continued....) Federal Communications Commission DA 02-2794 Federal Communications Commission
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3228A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3228A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3228A1.txt
  • BellSouth Petition at 4-5. See BellSouth Reply, Attachment 1, Affidavit of Rudine J. Davis (attesting that each collocating entity was sent a copy of BellSouth's petition and an excerpt from attachment 3 to the petition indicating the wire center(s) in which that entity was collocated). See also 47 C.F.R. § 1.774. BellSouth Reply at 4 n.6. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.17, 1.65(a). Joint Commenters at 7. Id. at 7-8 BellSouth Pricing Flexibility Order, 15 FCC Rcd at 24596. BellSouth Pricing Flexibility Order, 15 FCC Rcd at 24596. AT&T contended that BellSouth erroneously listed AT&T as a collocator for two wire centers. In response, BellSouth provided an affidavit in support of its claim that AT&T did in fact collocate in one of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-336A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-336A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-336A1.txt
  • Licensee of Various Land Mobile and Microwave Licenses ) ) ) ) ) ) File Number: EB-01-IH-0262 NAL/Acct. Number: 20023208002 FORFEITURE ORDER Adopted: March 11, 2002 Released: March 12, 2002 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: Introduction In this Forfeiture Order, we issue a monetary forfeiture in the amount of $5,500 against Northeast Utilities for having willfully and repeatedly violated Section 1.17 of the Commission's rules. The violations relate to Northeast Utilities' failure in three applications filed with the Commission to properly disclose that it had been convicted of felonies. Background On September 27, 1999, Northeast Utilities Service Company, a subsidiary of Northeast Utilities, pleaded guilty to six counts of violating the Clean Water Act. On the same day, Northeast Nuclear Energy
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3604A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3604A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3604A1.txt
  • of wireless Internet, advanced data, and 3G services, and global competition within these services, have created a shortage of suitable available spectrum. See Amendment of the Commission's Rules Regarding Installment Payment Financing for Personal Communications Services (PCS) Licensees, WT Docket No. 97-82, Sixth Report and Order and Order on Reconsideration, 15 FCC Rcd 16,266, 16,278-79 ¶ 23 (2000). Under section 1.17 of the Commission's rules, applicants are prohibited from making misrepresentations or willful material omissions in any application, pleading, report, or other written statement submitted to the Commission. 47 C.F.R. § 1.17. Thus, we take notice of these admissions in evaluating Mountain Solutions' long-form applications. However, we also note that Mountain Solutions failed to notify us directly of its changed financial
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-407A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-407A1.txt
  • by real RNSS systems. 12 USA/ /6 SUP RESOLUTION 605 (WRC-2000) Reasons: This resolution is no longer needed because of the changes made to S5.328A, the addition of Section VI to Article S21 and the addition of Resolution RNSS. DRAFT PROPOSAL FOR THE WORK OF THE CONFERENCE Doc. WAC/094(06.02.02)/1.17 (NTIA Draft Proposal coordinated with the WRC-03 Advisory Committee) Agenda Item 1.17: to consider upgrading the allocation to the radiolocation service in the frequency range 2 900-3 100 MHz to primary; Background Information: Due to changes in requirements and missions of the radiolocation service, it is necessary to augment existing primary allocations in bands below 6 GHz where unique propagation properties exist. Changes in technology are driving a need for larger bandwidth
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-706A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-706A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-706A1.txt
  • as the cable space is made available since billing for these elements commences one the space is turned over.'' Verizon March 13 ex parte at 2. Verizon March 13 ex parte at 2. Verizon Reply Comments at 5-6. BellSouth Pricing Flexibility Order, 15 FCC Rcd at 24595-96 ¶ 16. Id. Id. Id. at 24596 ¶ 17. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.17, 1.65(a). See Pricing Flexibility Order, 14 FCC Rcd. at 14221 ¶ 86. See id. at 14266-67 ¶ 81 n.221 (examples of various charges associated with collocation arrangements, both recurring and non-recurring). See 47 C.F.R. § 1.774(e)(1)(ii). See supra note 38 and accompanying text. 47 U.S.C. § 214. In response to inquiries by Bureau staff, Verizon filed an ex parte on
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-802A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-802A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-802A1.txt
  • Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C. 20554 In the Matter of Amendment of Section 1.17 of the Commission's Rules Concerning Truthful Statements to the Commission. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) GC Docket No. 02-37 Adopted: April 10, 2002 Released: April 10, 2002 By the Assistant General Counsel, Administrative Law Division: 1. This order grants the Federal Communications Bar Association's (FCBA) Request for an Extension of Time to File Comments, filed April
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-823A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-823A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-823A1.txt
  • Memorandum Opinion and Order, 16 FCC Rcd 5040, 5052 (2001). Focal/Pac-West Comments at 7. Pricing Flexibility Order, 14 FCC Rcd at 14266, para. 82, para. 93 n.257. Focal/Pac-West Comments at 8. See also AT&T Comments at 3. Id. BellSouth Pricing Flexibility Order, 15 FCC Rcd at 24596. Joint Reply at 6. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.774. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.17, 1.65(a). Pac-West Comments at 8. Pacific Bell Reply at 6. Pricing Flexibility Order, 14 FCC Rcd at 14309. 47 C.F.R. § 1.774(a)(3)(i)-(iv)(A). For price cap LECs, the ``base period'' is the 12-month period (i.e., the calendar year) ending 6 months before the effective date of the LECs' annual access tariffs. 47 C.F.R. § 61.3(g). 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.774(a)(3)(i)-(iii), (iv)(B). Ameritech
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2598A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2598A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2598A1.txt
  • August 11, 2003 Released: August 12, 2003 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: 1. In this Order, we adopt the attached Consent Decree entered into between the Enforcement Bureau and Ralph H. Tyler (``Tyler''). The Consent Decree terminates an investigation by the Enforcement Bureau into whether Tyler misrepresented facts to, or lacked candor with, the Commission regarding Station KTSH(FM), violated Sections 1.17 and/or 73.1015 of the Commission's rules and engaged in related misconduct. 2. The Enforcement Bureau and Tyler have negotiated the terms of a Consent Decree that would resolve this matter and terminate the investigation. A copy of the Consent Decree is attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. 3. Based upon the record before us, and in light of Tyler's
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2598A2.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2598A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2598A2.txt
  • Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit CONSENT DECREE I. Introduction The Enforcement Bureau of the Federal Communications Commission and Ralph H. Tyler hereby enter into a Consent Decree resolving conduct by Tyler regarding Station KTSH(FM), Tishomingo, Oklahoma, in violation of Sections 1.17 and/or 73.1015 of the Commission's rules. For purposes of this Consent Decree, the following definitions shall apply: ``Act'' means the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. § 151 et seq.; ``Adopting Order'' means an Order of the Bureau adopting the terms and conditions of this Consent Decree; ``Bureau'' means the FCC's Enforcement Bureau; ``Commission'' or ``FCC'' means the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2721A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2721A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2721A1.txt
  • 3030 (1996) (``the Federal Communications Commission reminds parties to our proceedings and their attorneys that our rules prohibit the filing of frivolous pleadings or pleadings filed for the purpose of delay in proceedings before the Commission or its staff.''). See In re Mercury PCS II, LLC, 2000, 15 FCC Rcd 14559, 14563 (2000). Response at 4. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.17. Liberty Cable Co., Inc., 15 FCC Rcd 25050, 25071 (2000), recon. denied, 16 FCC Rcd 16105 (2001), citing Swan Creek Communications v. FCC, 39 F.3d 1217, 1222 (D.C. Cir. 1994); Sea Island Broadcasting Corp. v. FCC, 627 F.2d 240, 243 (D.C. Cir. 1980), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 834 (1980). See also Contemporary Media, Inc., et al. v. FCC, 214 F3d
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3121A3.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3121A3.txt
  • of any of the above information pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 6 2703(f); and (0 access to, or acquisition or interception of, or preservation of communications or information as described in (a) through (e) above and comparable State laws. 1.15. `TF' means the Federal Bureau of Investigation. 1.16. means n0rrU.S. `Toreign" where used in this Agreement, whether capitalized or lower case, 1.17. "GCL" - means Global Crossing Ltd., a Bermuda corporation. Page 6 1.18. "Governmental Authoritv` ' or "Governmental Authorities" means any government, or any governmental, administrative, or regulatory entity, authority, commission, board, agency, instrumentality, bureau, or political subdivision, and any court, tribunal, judicial, or arbitral body. 1.19. `9nterceDt" or ``Intercepted" has the meaning defined in 18 U.S.C. 2510(4). 1.20. "LawfUl U.S.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3307A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3307A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3307A1.txt
  • 11 (2002). High Sierra Broadcasting, Inc., Decision, 96 FCC 2d 423, 427 (Rev. Bd. 1983). See Petition at 11. Arizona, California, Florida, Hawaii, Kentucky, Mississippi, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, Nevada, Oklahoma and Texas are listed as locations. Id. at 3-9. The frequencies listed are in the 450-512 MHz, 800 MHz, and 900 MHz bands. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.17 (misrepresentation or willful omission is prohibited in any written statement to the Commission), 1.923(a) (applications must contain all information requested on the form or by applicable rule). See, e.g., William L. Zawila, Order to Show Cause, Notice of Opportunity for Hearing, and Hearing Designation Order, FCC 03-158, ¶¶ 52-53, 62, 99-100 (rel. July 16, 2003). See, e.g., Hicks Broadcasting of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3563A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3563A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3563A1.txt
  • prior proceeding. The Governor asserts that, although the nolo contendere plea and DOL investigation involved companies affiliated with Tan Holdings, it was Pacific Telecom and not Tan Holdings that was before the Commission as an applicant and the misstatements were made to serve Pacific Telecom's interests. The Governor therefore would have us find in this case a violation of section 1.17 based on Pacific Telecom's alleged failure in the prior proceeding to respond fully and accurately to questions raised in that proceeding. We find that the Governor's allegations, which are based on conduct in the prior proceeding, do not provide a sufficient basis to conclude that Pacific Telecom violated section 1.17 of the Commission's rules or otherwise lacks the character qualifications
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3618A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3618A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3618A1.txt
  • Revision of Part 21 of the Commission's Rules, Report and Order, 2 FCC Rcd 5713, 5724 ¶ 82 (1987) (Part 21 R&O)). Id. See id. See Response Letter, supra. 47 C.F.R. § 21.911 See Part 21 R&O. Part 21 R&O, 2 FCC Rcd at 5724 ¶ 83. See id. See Petition For Reconsideration. 47 C.F.R. § 21.303(d). 47 C.F.R. § 1.17. Federal Communications Commission DA 03-3618 Federal Communications Commission DA 03-3618 & " # $ & 1 2 7 : M T Š œ Ÿ ¬ ­ Ì Í Ï H& 1 2 hÒ{ hÒ{ 2 hÒ{ k É * & 4 2 Ò{ ­
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1536A2.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1536A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1536A2.txt
  • or an officer of the station. Send the response to EEO Staff, Policy Division, Media Bureau, Federal Communications Commission, 445 12th Street, S.W., Washington, DC 20554. To knowingly and willfully make any false statement or conceal any material fact in response to this audit is punishable by fine or imprisonment (see 18 U.S.C. § 1001; see also 47 C.F.R. § 1.17), and/or revocation of any station license or construction permit [47 U.S. Code § 312(a)(1)], and/or forfeiture (47 U.S.C. § 503). Should you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact the EEO Staff at (202) 418-1450. 6. In accordance with 47 C.F.R. § 73.3526(e)(10) for commercial stations and 47 C.F.R. § 73.3527(e)(11) for noncommercial stations, copies attached, you are required
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1536A3.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1536A3.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1536A3.txt
  • of the owner of the unit. Send the response to EEO Staff, Policy Division, Media Bureau, Federal Communications Commission, 445 12th Street, S.W., Washington, DC 20554. To knowingly and willfully make any false statement or conceal any material fact in response to this audit is punishable by fine or imprisonment (see 18 U.S.C. § 1001; see also 47 C.F.R. § 1.17), and/or forfeiture (47 U.S.C. § 503). Should you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact the EEO Staff at (202) 418-1450. 6. In accordance with 47 C.F.R. § 76.79 of the Commission's rules, a copy of this letter and your response will be placed in the Commission's public file on your unit. Sincerely, Lewis Pulley Assistant Chief, Policy Division
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1537A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1537A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1537A1.txt
  • notifications of timely construction. As a result, the granted relief does not extend to notifications for construction that was not completed by the applicable deadline. Under the Commission's Rules, failure to construct by the applicable deadline, absent an extension of time to construct, results in automatic termination of the license. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.946(c). We remind licensees that Section 1.17 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.17, requires truthful statements in all filings with the Commission, and that there are severe penalties for filing false notifications. See, e.g., MobileMedia Corporation, Order to Show Cause, Hearing Designation Order, and Notice of Opportunity for Hearing for Forfeiture, 12 FCC Rcd 14896, 14899-14900 ¶¶ 7-9 (1997). See 47 C.F.R. § 21.43 (1995).
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1698A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1698A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1698A1.txt
  • set of findings from this study of the maximum amount of spectrum desired, as well as what can be accomplished with lesser amounts of additional allocated broadcasting spectrum, including the case where no new spectrum for broadcasting is added. (April 30, 2004) Radio Conference Subcommittee (RCS) Preparation for ITU Radiocommunication Conferences UNITED STATES DRAFT PRELIMINARY VIEWS ON WRC-07 Agenda Item 1.17: to consider the results of ITU-R studies on compatibility between the fixed-satellite service and other services around 1.4 GHz, in accordance with Resolution 745 (WRC-03); ISSUE: Resolution 745 (WRC-03), deals with the protection of existing services in all Regions from non-geostationary-satellite feederlinks for mobile-satellite service links below 1 GHz operating in the fixed-satellite service and using the frequency bands around
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1698A1_Erratum.doc
  • set of findings from this study of the maximum amount of spectrum desired, as well as what can be accomplished with lesser amounts of additional allocated broadcasting spectrum, including the case where no new spectrum for broadcasting is added. (April 30, 2004) Radio Conference Subcommittee (RCS) Preparation for ITU Radiocommunication Conferences UNITED STATES DRAFT PRELIMINARY VIEWS ON WRC-07 Agenda Item 1.17: to consider the results of ITU-R studies on compatibility between the fixed-satellite service and other services around 1.4 GHz, in accordance with Resolution 745 (WRC-03); ISSUE: Resolution 745 (WRC-03), deals with the protection of existing services in all Regions from non-geostationary-satellite feederlinks for mobile-satellite service links below 1 GHz operating in the fixed-satellite service and using the frequency bands around
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2437A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2437A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2437A1.txt
  • Bureau: By: David H. Solomon Chief, Enforcement Bureau For Blackstone~NEY Ultrasonics, Inc.: By: Eugene Phaneuf President Blackstone~NEY Ultrasonics, Inc. COMPLIANCE PLAN I. PERSONNEL AND TRAINING 1. Compliance Officer Blackstone~NEY will appoint a Regulatory Compliance Officer (``Compliance Officer''), who will administer the compliance program described below. The Compliance Officer will also supervise Blackstone~NEY's compliance with Parts 2 and 18 and Section 1.17 of the FCC's Rules and the requirements of the Consent Decree. 2. Written Advisory Within 45 days of the Effective Date of the Consent Decree, the Compliance Officer will send a written advisory on Parts 2 and 18 of the FCC's Rules, Section 1.17 of the FCC's Rules, and the requirements of the Consent Decree to each officer and employee
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2668A2.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2668A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2668A2.txt
  • above and comparable State laws. 1.14 ``FBI'' means the Federal Bureau of Investigation. 1.15 ``Foreign'' where used in this Agreement, whether capitalized or lower case, means non-U.S. 1.16 ``Government Authority'' or ``Government Authorities'' means any government, or any governmental, administrative, or regulatory entity, authority, commission, board, agency, instrumentality, bureau or political subdivision and any court, tribunal, judicial or arbitral body. 1.17 ``Intercept'' or ``Intercepted'' has the meaning defined in 18 U.S.C. § 2510(4). 1.18 ``Lawful U.S. Process'' means lawful U.S. federal, state or local Electronic Surveillance or other court orders, processes, or authorizations issued under U.S. federal, state, or local law for physical search or seizure, production of tangible things, or access to or disclosure of Domestic Communications, Call Associated Data,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3569A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3569A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3569A1.txt
  • carrier . . .''). Answer, Exhibit M (Interconnection Agreement) at Part 13.0 (VZ 002153-54). The Interconnection Agreement defines ``Collocation'' as ``an arrangement in which the equipment of [Broadview] is installed and maintained at the premises of Verizon for the purpose of Interconnection with Verizon and access to the unbundled Network Element[s] of Verizon.'' Answer, Exhibit M (Interconnection Agreement) at Part 1.17 (VZ 002101). Answer, Exhibit M (Interconnection Agreement) at Part 13.1 (VZ 002153). The Interconnection Agreement defines ``Tariff'' as ``any applicable federal or state tariff of a Party, as may be amended by the Party from time to time, under which a Party offers a particular service, facility, or arrangement.'' Answer, Exhibit M (Interconnection Agreement) at Part 1.79 (VZ 002108). Answer,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1316A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1316A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1316A1.txt
  • (filed Sept. 4, 2003). 47 C.F.R. § 24.839(a)(4). Reply to Supplement at 3. See Application of Alpine-Fresno C, LLC, Debtor-in-Possession, ULS File No. 0001653450 (amended June 29, 2004) (stating that license WPOJ687 is not constructed); Application of Alpine-Michigan E, LLC, Debtor-in-Possession, ULS File No. 0001653360 (amended June 29, 2004) (stating that license WPSJ964 is not constructed). See 47 C.F.R. § 1.17. Petition at 10. See id. Id. Broz also notes that some of the licenses are still part of the Commission's installment payment program. Id. D.H. Overmyer, 94 F.C.C.2d at 124 ¶ 10. See id. Petition at 10. William B. Calcutt, FCC Form 602 (filed Feb. 9, 2004, Apr. 20, 2005). See also Motion to Strike at 8-9. 47 C.F.R. 24.839(a)(4).
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1633A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1633A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1633A1.txt
  • the prize package was not mentioned in the Station's promotions about the contest. See October Response at Exhibit 1, ¶2. Capstar fails to provide any explanation for these opposing statements and has not provided audio tapes or transcripts of the contest advertisements. See Complaint at 1; Initial Response at 1 (attaching contest rules, which state ``prize value: $30,000 (approx.).'' Section 1.17 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.17, prohibits licensees from submitting to the Commission written and oral statements of fact that are intentionally incorrect or misleading and written statements of fact that are made without a reasonable basis for believing that the statements of fact are correct and not misleading. In this case, the affidavit of Sarah Hannon, submitted
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1633A1_Erratum.doc
  • the prize package was not mentioned in the Station's promotions about the contest. See October Response at Exhibit 1, ¶2. Capstar fails to provide any explanation for these opposing statements and has not provided audio tapes or transcripts of the contest advertisements. See Complaint at 1; Initial Response at 1 (attaching contest rules, which state ``prize value: $30,000 (approx.).'' Section 1.17 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.17, prohibits licensees from submitting to the Commission written and oral statements of fact that are intentionally incorrect or misleading and written statements of fact that are made without a reasonable basis for believing that the statements of fact are correct and not misleading. In this case, the affidavit of Sarah Hannon, submitted
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1641A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1641A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1641A1.txt
  • actually paid for Petitioners' airfare. CBS Opposition at 1. We note that this error was contained in the Declaration of Map Marketing Vice President Pat Ranier and relied on by CBS. Petitioners have provided no evidence suggesting that CBS knew or should have known of the error when it submitted the Declaration with its LOI Response. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.17 (imposing duty on respondents to have a reasonable basis for material factual statements to the Commission). Accordingly, we deny Petitioners' request that we should impose a sanction against CBS for this error. See Dena Pictures, Inc. et al, Memorandum Opinion and Order, 71 FCC 2d 1402, 1409, ¶ 15 (1979) (Commission rejected allegation of a violation of the contest rule
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1983A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1983A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1983A1.txt
  • renewal application for evidentiary hearing. Nevertheless, we will admonish Southern and remind the licensee that its public inspection file should be organized so that the public can access and readily locate items in the file. WKVE(FM)'s staff should also continue to make itself available for questions about the file, pursuant to Section 73.3526(c)(2)(iii) of the Commission's rules. Violation of Section 1.17. Additionally, as stated in Note 4 above, Southern was issued a Notice of Apparent Liability for $19,250 by the full Commission in November of 2003 for violation of Section 1.17 of the Commission's rules, which requires the submission of truthful written material to the Commission. Southern violated that provision when it altered the dates of letters submitted in an October
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2785A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2785A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2785A1.txt
  • All such declarations provided should comply with section 1.16 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.16, and be substantially in the form set forth therein. To knowingly and willfully make any false statement or conceal any material fact in reply to this inquiry is punishable by fine or imprisonment. See 18 U.S.C. § 1001; see also 47 C.F.R. § 1.17. Failure to respond appropriately to a Bureau LOI constitutes a violation of the Communications Act and our rules. See SBC Communications, Inc., Order of Forfeiture, 17 FCC Rcd 7589 (2002); Globcom Inc., Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture and Order, 18 FCC Rcd 19893, n. 36 (2003) ); World Communications Satellite Systems, Inc., Forfeiture Order, 19 FCC Rcd 2718 (Enf.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2908A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2908A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2908A1.txt
  • ``Petitioners'') directed to the July 2, 2004, action of the Chief, Audio Division (the ``Staff Decision''), granting the above-referenced Educational Media Foundation (``EMF'') application for construction permit (the ``Application'') to build new FM translator station K255BE at Tulsa, Oklahoma. For the reasons set forth below, we dismiss the petition for reconsideration. Petitioners state that the subject application violates Sections 74.1232, 1.17 and 1.65 of the Commission's rules. Specifically, Section III-A, Item 14 of the application for authority to construct an FM Translator, FCC Form 349, requests that the applicant certify that it does not have any interest in an application or an authorization for an FM translator station that serves substantially the same area and rebroadcasts the same signal as the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3208A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3208A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3208A1.txt
  • to relocate Station WBTS from Athens to Doraville, Georgia. As a result of the instant proposal which relocates the Station WKLZ away from Atlanta and downgrades the allotment, Station WBTS would be able to relocate the Station WBTS transmitter site closer to Atlanta. In this regard, Infinity Broadcasting suggests that the parties have not complied with the ``spirit'' of Section 1.17 of the rules which requires a rulemaking proponent to provide all material information necessary to insure that factual statements made to the Commission are not incorrect or misleading. 3. We are substituting Channel 239A for Channel 239C3 at Greenville, Georgia, reallotting Channel 239A to Waverly Hall, Georgia, and modifying the Station WKZJ license to specify operation on Channel 239A at
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-476A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-476A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-476A1.txt
  • service may communicate with aircraft earth stations in the secondary aeronautical mobile-satellite service. The provisions of Nos. 5.29, 5.30 and 5.31 apply. Reason: Reflects regional differences in FSS allocations and is consequential to the reasons given above. RECOMMENDED CHANGES TO DRAFT PRELIMINARY VIEWS ORIGINATED BY THE NATIONAL TELECOMMUNICATIONS AND INFORMATION ADMINISTRATION Document WAC/042(23.02.05): PRELIMINARY VIEWS ON WRC-07 WRC-07 Agenda Item: 1.17 to consider the results of ITU-R studies on compatibility between the fixed-satellite service and other services around 1.4 GHz, in accordance with Resolution 745 (WRC-03).; ISSUE: At WRC-03, the Conference decided to make the bands 1 390-1 392 MHz and 1 430-1 432 MHz available for the fixed-satellite service (FSS), on a secondary basis, for feeder links in the (Earth-to
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1427A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1427A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1427A1.txt
  • with the Commission. However, because of the untruthfulness of ICS's certification in the WVXG(FM) assignment application that it had no other broadcast interests at a time when Litton, its sole principal, was still an officer of another Commission broadcast permittee, and subsequently certified an FCC filing on behalf of that permittee, confirming his continued position in it, ICS violated Section 1.17 of the Commission's rules. We will admonish ICS for that violation, and we caution it to be more attentive to its applicant certifications in the future. A false statement, even absent an intent to deceive, constitutes an actionable violation of Section 1.17 of the Commission's rules. Conclusion/Order. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, that the Petition to Deny filed on September 1,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1505A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1505A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1505A1.txt
  • in its renewal application, amendments, and in responses to Commission inquiries, which provided less than complete, factually sound information. The Commission relies on licensees to provide truthful and accurate information in order to carry out its mission. When issuing a license, we must be assured of the accuracy of the licensee's representations. Recently, the Commission expanded the scope of Section 1.17, with respect to investigations and adjudications, to prohibit ``written and oral statements of fact that are intentionally incorrect or misleading and written statements that are made without a reasonable basis for believing the statement is correct and not misleading.'' Misrepresentation involves false statements made with an intent to deceive. Lack of candor involves concealment, evasion, or other failure to be
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1646A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1646A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1646A1.txt
  • had submitted accurate information (particularly with respect to its coordination agreements), which all Commission licensees are expected to do, its application for streamlined treatment would have been dismissed or denied. Instead, the Commission approved Intelsat's request for modification based on Intelsat's certifications, which apparently were untrue. Based on our review of the record, we find that Intelsat apparently violated Section 1.17 of the Commission's rules by making erroneous certifications in the process of relocating its Intelsat 604 spacecraft. This rule provides in pertinent part: (a) . . . no [Applicant for any Commission authorization] shall . . . (2) in any written statement of fact, provide material factual information that is incorrect or omit material information that is necessary to prevent
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2077A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2077A1.txt
  • APPARENT LIABILITY FOR FORFEITURE Adopted: October 19, 2006 Released: October 20, 2006 By the Chief, Investigations and Hearings Division, Enforcement Bureau: I. INTRODUCTION 1. In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture ("NAL"), we find that C5 Communications, LLC, ("C5 Communications" or the "Company"), Applicant for Special Temporary Authority to Operate a 1.0 meter Ku-Band Earth Station, apparently violated Section 1.17 of the Federal Communications Commission's (the "Commission" or "FCC") rules1 by twice using a false name to certify the accuracy of certain matters to the Commission in an application for Special Temporary Authority ("STA").2 For the reasons explained below, we conclude that C5 Communications is apparently liable for a forfeiture in the amount of seventeen thousand five hundred dollars ($17,500).
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2098A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2098A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2098A1.txt
  • Rcd 773 (MMB 1997) (Ed Vrdolyak and Ty Wansley). Entertainment Tonight, 3 FCC Rcd at 245, quoting Henry Geller, 95 FCC 2d 1236 (1983). Id. at 245. Id. Id. at 245-6. Donahue, 56 RR 2d at 147. Id. at 148. We note that broadcast licensees must provide truthful and accurate statements to the Commission or be in violation of Section 1.17 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. §1.17. See, e.g., Politically Incorrect, supra; Howard Stern, supra. Jack Parr, supra. See Complaint and attached decision. See id. Entertainment Tonight, 3 FCC Rcd at 246. (...continued from previous page) (continued....) Federal Communications Commission DA 06-2098 Federal Communications Commission FCC 00-XXX h �@ˆþÿ œ › œ ¦ (c) ª h hÎ h h h
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2344A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2344A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2344A1.txt
  • application that it had placed all required documentation in the station's public file at the appropriate times was untrue. The Commission relies on licensees to provide truthful and accurate information in order to carry out its mission. When issuing a license, we must be assured of the accuracy of the licensee's representations. Recently, the Commission expanded the scope of Section 1.17 of the Rules, with respect to investigations and adjudications, to prohibit ``written and oral statements of fact that are intentionally incorrect or misleading and written statements that are made without a reasonable basis for believing the statement is correct and not misleading.'' Misrepresentation involves false statements made with an intent to deceive. Lack of candor involves concealment, evasion, or other
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2554A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2554A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2554A1.txt
  • adjustment in a forfeiture. 22. Finally, CRC argues that the proposed forfeiture should be reduced because ``CRC has no prior history of noncompliance with applicable FCC regulations.'' The president of CRC, James Kay, however, does have a history of noncompliance. In a prior proceeding, the Commission found that Kay deliberately withheld material information from the Commission, in violation of Section 1.17 of the Rules, and issued a forfeiture of $10,000 to Kay. Because of Kay's previous noncompliance, we are unable to find that CRC has a history of compliance with the Rules. 23. We have examined CRC's response to the NAL pursuant to the statutory factors above, and in conjunction with the Forfeiture Policy Statement. As a result of our review,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-617A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-617A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-617A1.txt
  • Ultimate Parent Company of Licensees of Various Authorizations in the Private Land Mobile Radio Services ) ) ) ) ) ) ) File No. EB-05-IH-0717 NAL/Acct. No. 200632080151 FRN No. 0005865258 ORDER Adopted: March 22, 2006 Released: March 23, 2006 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: 1. The Enforcement Bureau has been investigating compliance by Koch Industries, Inc. (``Koch'') with Section 1.17 of the Commission's rules, relating to truthful and accurate statements to the Commission in license applications filed by entities of which Koch is the ultimate parent company. 2. The Bureau and Koch have negotiated the terms of a Consent Decree, a copy of which is attached hereto and incorporated by reference. After reviewing the terms of the Consent Decree, we
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-617A2.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-617A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-617A2.txt
  • Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit CONSENT DECREE The Enforcement Bureau of the Federal Communications Commission and Koch Industries, Inc. hereby enter into this Consent Decree for the purpose of resolving the Enforcement Bureau's investigation of compliance by Koch Industries, Inc., and entities of which Koch Industries, Inc. is the ultimate parent company, with Section 1.17 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.17. For purposes of this Consent Decree, the following definitions shall apply: ``Act'' means the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. § 151 et seq. ``Adopting Order'' means an order of the Bureau, adopting this Consent Decree, without any modifications adverse to Koch. ``Any'' shall be construed to include the word
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-655A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-655A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-655A1.txt
  • All such declarations provided should comply with section 1.16 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.16, and be substantially in the form set forth therein. To knowingly and willfully make any false statement or conceal any material fact in reply to this inquiry is punishable by fine or imprisonment. See 18 U.S.C. § 1001; see also 47 C.F.R. § 1.17. Failure to respond appropriately to a Bureau LOI constitutes a violation of the Communications Act and our rules. See SBC Communications, Inc., Order of Forfeiture, 17 FCC Rcd 7589 (2002); Globcom Inc., Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture and Order, 18 FCC Rcd 19893, n. 36 (2003) ); World Communications Satellite Systems, Inc., Forfeiture Order, 19 FCC Rcd 2718 (Enf.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-860A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-860A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-860A1.txt
  • vehicles legally domiciled in the British Virgin Islands and the Cayman Islands. Based on the representations of the Petitioner, including its statement that Goldman Sachs is U.S.-controlled, we find that 3.03 percent of Goldman Sach's shares in TelCove are from the United States and that the remaining 12.56 percent are from WTO Member investors. We will also treat Fernwood Associates' 1.17 percent equity and voting interest in TelCove as investment from the United States. We do so because of the small interest that Fernwood Associates holds in TelCove as a result of TelCove's Chapter 11 reorganization and in view of Fernwood Associates' domicile in the United States. We are concerned, however, that Fernwood Associates, and Goldman Sachs, did not respond to
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-960A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-960A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-960A1.txt
  • situations involving services allocated with equal rights) (km) Type of earth station Type of terrestrial station Ground-based Mobile (aircraft) (all bands not included elsewhere in Table 10) 500 Reasons: For No. 9.17, this modification is needed to cover the case of ground-based earth stations and aircraft terrestrial stations. Document WAC/094(27.04.06): DRAFT PROPOSALS FOR THE WORK OF THE CONFERENCE Agenda Item 1.17: to consider the results of ITU-R studies on compatibility between the fixed-satellite service and other services around 1.4 GHz, in accordance with Resolution 745 (WRC-03); Background Information: WRC-03 made a conditional secondary allocation to the fixed- satellite service (FSS) for feeder links for non-geostationary-satellite (NGSO) networks in the mobile-satellite service (MSS) with service links below 1 GHz (NGSO-MSS) through RR
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1094A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1094A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1094A1.txt
  • Rcd 16278 (Sat. Div., Int'l Bur. 2005). ATCONTACT Communications, LLC, File No. SAT-MOD 20061115-00139, Technical Appendix, at 26. See EchoStar Satellite LLC, Order and Authorization, 21 FCC Rcd 4077 (Sat. Div., Int'l Bur. 2006). We remind ATCONTACT of its obligation to ensure and maintain the accuracy and completeness of all materials and information provided to the Commission. 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.17 and 1.65. ATCONTACT Communications, LLC, File No. SAT-MOD 20061115-00139, Technical Appendix, at 26. Federal Communications Commission DA 07-1094 Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C. 20554 h} h h Y Z h h h_ h � „Bž‹kÈ(/YMž¼`鉉ÿ‰PNG ò0ÞÇàeX...•W0f÷"˸ -Ê� ÚD... p-Cœ C\ i8 €] ~'›õ\àœ‚ gÌbF‹JU Ý}pŒô Ó´‚:|Y÷.Ì•É �ƒë`]feâʦÈS ŠÚ8ûõæ¿o€ë(R)Ë Îý -ˆo} õ^ rt2 ; X‡0~BÁe6%ÕÞÉü70oˆB(R)xîoGîÀ Æk¢³"a Án�"W -1ñã$˜7'ûžíé2 o þ ï‹�
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2798A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2798A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2798A1.txt
  • ) ) ) ) Facility ID No. 26676 NAL/Acct. No. 0741420052 FRN: 0013990346 ORDER Adopted: June 25, 2007 Released: June 26, 2007 By the Chief, Media Bureau: In this Order, we adopt the attached Consent Decree entered into between the Media Bureau and CMCG Puerto Rico License LLC (``CMCGPR''). The Consent Decree resolves issues of whether CMCGPR complied with Section 1.17 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules'') with regard to the truth and accuracy of the statements contained in its September 18, 2006, license application for Station WMEI(TV), Arecibo, Puerto Rico. The Media Bureau and CMCGPR have negotiated the terms of a Consent Decree that resolves this matter. A copy of the Consent Decree is attached hereto and incorporated by reference.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3327A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3327A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3327A1.txt
  • Informal Complaint that the named individuals and companies have engaged in the unauthorized transfer of control of private land mobile radio (PLMR) station licenses, in violation of Section 310(d) of the Act; filed fraudulent applications using the name of a deceased person and made willful false statements before the Commission, in violation of the United States Criminal Code and Section 1.17 of the Commission's Rules; engaged in unlicensed radio operations, in violation of Section 301 of the Act; and obtained Commission licenses ``under various alter-egos or `shill' entities'' for the purpose of evading the limits in Sections 90.35(e) and 90.187(e) of the Commission's Rules on how many channels a single applicant may request. The second pleading is a ``Petition to Dismiss
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3419A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3419A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3419A1.txt
  • Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully and repeatedly violated Section 1.17 of the Rules by falsely certifying in the captioned license renewal applications that the Stations' public inspection files were complete throughout the license term and by providing in a written statement material factual information that was incorrect without a reasonable basis for believing that such information was correct and not misleading. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3470A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3470A5.txt
  • Sun-Times); and, d) markets with Joint Operating Agreements (JOA) (e.g. the Detroit News and Free Press entered a 100 year JOA in 1987).16 The market structure indicators show that 7.1% of the newspapers belong to a JOA, 50.8% are in a competitive market, 8% are part of two-edition monopoly markets, and the remaining 34.1% are monopolist newspapers as shows Figure IV.1.17 Table IV.2 presents descriptive statistics for the variables to be used. The size of the page is in terms of column inches in order to match it with the available advertisement data (e.g. a page size of an average broad sheet is 127.4, which is calculated by multiplying the number of columns by the height of the columns, in this
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3470A6.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3470A6.txt
  • Stations Percent of Stations with Cross-Owned Newspaper Percent of Stations with Cross-Owned TV Station Number of Commercial Stations Owned Nationally by In-Market Owners Marg. Effect T-Stat Marg. Effect T-Stat Marg. Effect T-Stat Marg. Effect T-Stat Marg. Effect T-Stat Adj R-Squared N Format 101 Count 2.867 (0.27) 0.296* (5.96) 10.3716 (0.44) 1.871 (0.58) 0.001932* (3.45) 0.726 104 Format 101 HHI -0.098 (1.17) -0.001 (1.45) -0.1761 (-0.95) 0.013 (0.51) -0.000011* (-2.52) 0.072 104 Format 20 Count 1.226 (0.17) 0.116* (3.55) 11.1151 (0.72) 0.578 (0.27) 0.000810* (2.20) 0.426 104 Format 20 HHI -0.203 (1.94) -0.001 (1.79) -0.3479 (-1.52) 0.025 (0.80) -0.000008 (-1.42) 0.074 104 Format 11 Count -0.441 (0.13) 0.040* (2.47) -4.0090 (-0.53) -1.588 (-1.53) 0.000417* (2.31) 0.209 104 Format 11 HHI -0.219* (2.23)
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3515A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3515A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3515A1.txt
  • documentation in the WBFH(FM) public inspection file. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary forfeiture in the amount of seventeen thousand dollars ($17,000); we grant in part and deny in part RB's and Superior's pleadings; we admonish the Licensee for its apparent violation of Section 1.17 of the Rules; and we grant the Renewal Application. II. BACKGROUND Section 73.3539(a) of the Rules requires that applications for renewal of license for broadcast stations must be filed ``not later than the first day of the fourth full calendar month prior to the expiration date of the license sought to be renewed.'' An application for renewal of the Station's
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3615A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3615A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3615A1.txt
  • Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL''), issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 1.17 of the Rules by falsely certifying in the WWRL(AM) license renewal application that the Station's public inspection file was complete throughout the license term. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary forfeiture in the amount of ten thousand dollars ($10,000), and we grant the captioned
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4136A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4136A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4136A1.txt
  • after the assignment was completed. See Petition at 23-25, n.8 (citing FCC v. WOKO, Inc., 329 U.S. 223, 227 (1946); Fox Television Stations, Inc., Memorandum Opinion and Order, 10 FCC Rcd 8452, 8478 (1995); Pinelands, Inc., Memorandum Opinion and Order, 7 FCC Rcd 6058, 6065; Fox River Broadcasting, Inc., Order, 93 FCC 2d 127, 129 (1983)). See 47 C.F.R. § 1.17. See Contemporary Media, Inc., Decision, 13 FCC Rcd 14437, 14458-59 (1998), aff'd, Contemporary Media, Inc. v. FCC, 214 F.3d 187 (D.C. Cir. 2000). Intention can be inferred from motive. See, e.g., RKO General, Inc., Decision, 4 FCC Rcd 4679, 4684 (Rev. Bd. 1989). Opposition at 7. See Declaration of Richard Jackson, Executive Director, Research Foundation at 2 (May 15, 2007)
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4517A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4517A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4517A1.txt
  • quarterly issues and programs lists. Based on our review of the facts and circumstances, we conclude that AMFM Broadcasting apparently has willfully and repeatedly violated Section 73.3526 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules'') at KNEW(AM). As such, we propose a forfeiture against AMFM Broadcasting in the total amount of $10,000. We also conclude that Citicasters apparently has willfully violated Section 1.17(a) of the Rules for falsely responding ``Yes'' to Section II, Item 4, of KSJO(FM)'s renewal application, and propose a forfeiture against Citicasters in the total amount of $10,000. As discussed below, we will grant the YMC Petitions to the extent indicated, otherwise deny the petitions to deny and informal objections, and grant the Renewal Applications. II. THE RENEWAL APPLICATIONS In
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4679A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4679A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4679A1.txt
  • No. EB-06-IH-2019 NAL Account No. 200732080001 FRN No. 0014170831 FORFEITURE ORDER Adopted: November 19, 2007 Released: November 20, 2007 By the Chief, Investigations and Hearings Division, Enforcement Bureau: INTRODUCTION In this Forfeiture Order, we find that C5 Communications, LLC (``C5 Communications'' or the ``Company''), Applicant for Special Temporary Authority (``STA'') to Operate a 1.0 meter Ku-Band Earth Station, violated Section 1.17 of the Federal Communications Commission's (the ``Commission'' or ``FCC'') rules by twice using a false name to certify the accuracy of certain matters to the Commission in the STA applications it filed with the Commission. For the reasons explained below, we conclude that C5 Communications is liable for a forfeiture in the amount of seventeen thousand five hundred dollars ($17,500).
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4876A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4876A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4876A1.txt
  • Radio Services ) ) ) ) ) ) ) File No. EB-07-IH-4914 FRN No. 0003477551 NAL Account No. 200732080027 ORDER Adopted: December 6, 2007 Released: December 7, 2007 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: In this Order, we adopt a Consent Decree terminating an investigation by the Enforcement Bureau (the ``Bureau'') into compliance by BP Exploration (Alaska), Inc. (``BPXA''), with Section 1.17 of the Commission's Rules. The Bureau and BPXA have negotiated the terms of a Consent Decree that would terminate the Bureau's investigation. A copy of the Consent Decree is attached hereto. We have reviewed the terms of the Consent Decree and evaluated the facts before us. We believe that the public interest would be served by approving the Consent Decree
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4876A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4876A2.txt
  • Ground, Land Mobile, and Microwave Radio Services )))))))File No. EB-07-IH-4914 FRN No.0003477551 NAL Account No. 200732080027 CONSENT DECREE 1. The Enforcement Bureau of the Federal Communications Commission and BP Exploration (Alaska) Inc., by their authorized representatives, hereby enter into this Consent Decree for the purpose of resolving the Enforcement Bureau's investigation of compliance by BP Exploration (Alaska), Inc. with Section 1.17 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.17. 2. For purposes of this Consent Decree, the following definitions shall apply: (a)"Act"means the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §151 et seq. (b)"AdoptingOrder" means an order of the Bureau adopting this Consent Decree without any modifications adverse to BP Exploration (Alaska), Inc. (c)"Any" shall be construed to include the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4992A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4992A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4992A1.txt
  • $6,000 forfeiture for violation of Section 72.1216 in a single contest) (forfeiture paid); AMFM Radio Licenses LLC, et al, Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture, 19 FCC Rcd 5005 (2004) (maximum forfeiture imposed for each of multiple indecency rule violations) (forfeiture paid). See 47 U.S.C. § 503(b). See 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.111, 0.311 and 1.80. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 73.1216, 1.17 and 73.1015. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1914. For purposes of the forfeiture proceeding initiated by this NAL, Multicultural Radio Broadcasting Licensee, LLC shall be the only party to this proceeding. (continued....) Federal Communications Commission DA 07-4992 Federal Communications Commission DA 07-4992 ' ( v w '' - (R) ¯ ° ± µ ¾ à û h¢m h¢m h¢m h¢m �
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1108A1.pdf
  • contained in the licensee's construction notification must include: 19 Electronic coverage maps and other supporting documentation (47 C.F.R. § 24.203(c)). Theconstruction notification, including the coverage maps and supporting documents, must be truthful and accurate and must not omit material information that is necessary for the Commission to make a determination of compliance with its performance requirements. (See, e.g., 47 C.F.R. §1.17). The Commission delegated to the Wireless Bureau the responsibility for establishing the specifications for filing maps and other documents (e.g., file format and appropriate data) needed to determine a licensee's geographic coverage area. When the licensee files its construction notification, including its coverage maps and supporting documentation, the public will be given an opportunity to review and comment on the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1185A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1185A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1185A1.txt
  • quickly, whereas coordination of channel 45 faces a number of obstacles that could prevent it from completing its post-transition DTV facilities by the end of the DTV transition. KRCA concludes that it needs certainty so it can order equipment and commence construction of its post-transition DTV facilities. In the Notice, we noted that the substitution of channel 35 will cause 1.17 percent interference to KMEX, Los Angeles, CA (analog channel 34, pre-transition digital channel 35, and post-transition digital channel 34), and 0.24 percent interference to KNBC, Los Angeles, CA (analog channel 4, digital channel 36 for both pre- and post-transition). KRCA maintains that it should be allowed additional flexibility in finding a post-transition digital channel for KRCA-DT otherwise there is no
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1355A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1355A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1355A1.txt
  • method of computation. If Comtec did not report its real parties in interest on its short-form application, one reasonable inference is that it failed to do so because the revenues of such parties would have caused it to exceed the revenue limits for designated entity status and would have thereby made it ineligible for installment payments and bidding credits. Section 1.17 of the Commission's rules prohibits misrepresentations and lack of candor in Commission filings. Misrepresentations are false statements of fact made with an intent to deceive, while lack of candor involves concealment, evasion, and other failures to be fully informative accompanied by deceptive intent. The Commission may disqualify a license applicant or revoke the license of a licensee that makes misrepresentations
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1372A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1372A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1372A1.txt
  • 1.1204(a)(8). File No. BNPH-20070423AAS. Coosa Valley News, Inc. and Mr. Howard C. Toole, Letter, 22 FCC Rcd 18600 (MB 2007), petition for recon. pending (``Toole Decision''). Objection at 2. Id. Id. Opposition at 3-4. Memorandum Opinion and Order, 11 FCC Rcd 15464 (1996) (``Greater Muskegon Broadcasters''). Id. at 15472 (emphasis added). See, e.g., 47 U.S.C. § 309(d); 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.17, 1.41 - 1.77, 73.3584, 73.3587, 73.5006, 73.7004. See, e.g., 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.52, 73.3584(b). Coleman Objection, first unnumbered page. Id., second unnumbered page. Id., second-third unnumbered pages. See 47 U.S.C. § 310(d); Dorothy J. Owens, Debtor-in-Possession, Memorandum Opinion and Order, 5 FCC Rcd 6615 (1990). Cf. Policy Regarding Character Qualifications in Broadcast Licensing, Report, Order and Policy Statement, 102 FCC
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1536A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1536A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1536A1.txt
  • required that any lease be subject to an "unacceptable" six-month cancellation provision. Finally, Logos argues that its ability to receive an extension grant was not dependent on site availability since Logos had already substantially constructed the Station when the extension application was filed. As such, it asserts that it had no motive to deceive the Commission regarding site availability. Section 1.17(a) of the Rules provides that no person, in any written or oral statement of fact, may provide material factual information that is incorrect or misleading. It also provides that no person may provide in any written statement of fact, ``material factual information that is incorrect or omit material information that is necessary to prevent any material factual statement that is
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1576A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1576A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1576A1.txt
  • alleging that Riverside made a false certification in an earlier application to modify the WZNP(FM) facilities. For the reasons stated below, we treat the Petition as an Informal Objection and deny it, and we grant the Assignment Application. However, the Bureau finds that Riverside did, in fact, demonstrate a lack of candor on the Modification Application in violation of Section 1.17(a)(1) of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''). In this Memorandum Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL''), issued pursuant to 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Rules, by the Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau, by the authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1920A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1920A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1920A1.txt
  • CO 80021. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Kris Anne Monteith Chief, Enforcement Bureau 47 C.F.R. § 9.5(b). In a companion decision issued concurrently with this NAL, we propose a forfeiture of $25,000 against Cardinal for willfully providing incorrect material factual information to the Commission without a reasonable basis for believing that the information was correct and accurate in apparent violation of Section 1.17 of the Rules. Cardinal Broadband LLC, Notice of Apparent Liability, DA 08-1921 (Enf. Bur., rel. August 15, 2008). An interconnected VoIP service is a service that: (1) enables real-time, two-way voice communications; (2) requires a broadband connection from the user's location; (3) requires Internet Protocol-compatible customer premises equipment; and (4) permits users generally to receive calls that originate on the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1921A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1921A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1921A1.txt
  • Adopted: August 15, 2008 Released: August 15, 2008 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: I. introduction In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL''), we find Cardinal Broadband, LLC, aka Sovereign Telecommunications, a wholly owned subsidiary of Cardinal Communications, Inc. (hereinafter, ``Cardinal''), apparently liable for a forfeiture in the amount of twenty-five thousand dollars ($25,000) for willful violation of Section 1.17(a)(2) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''). The noted apparent violation involves Cardinal's provision of incorrect material factual information to the Commission without a reasonable basis for believing that the information was correct and accurate. II. BACKGROUND On July 13, 2007, the Commission received a complaint alleging that Cardinal, an interconnected Voice over Internet Protocol (``VoIP'') service provider, was not providing E911
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-410A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-410A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-410A1.txt
  • Partnership, Memorandum Opinion and Order, 17 FCC Rcd 21861, 21863-64 (2002) (``Eure''); MTD, Inc., Memorandum Opinion and Order, 6 FCC Rcd 34, 35 (1991); Wagenvoord Broadcasting Co., Memorandum Opinion and Order, 35 FCC 2d 361 (1972). See Eure, 17 FCC Rcd at 21863-64; Triad Broadcasting Company, Inc., Memorandum Opinion and Order, 96 FCC 2d 1235, 1244 (1984). See 47 C.F.R. §1.17. See Southern California, 7 FCC Rcd at 3455 (a licensee's ``frank'' response to a letter of inquiry did not warrant a downward adjustment as ``complete candor'' is required). 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.111, 0.311, 1.80(f)(4). (continued....) Federal Communications Commission DA 08-410 Federal Communications Commission DA 08-410 œ Î Ï Ð Ñ � ½ D ]
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-483A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-483A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-483A1.txt
  • and commonly owned Station KNWA-TV, raising matters regarding the Nexstar/Mission relationship that are additional to those advanced in the Petition to Deny the Station KFTA-TV assignment. After considering all the pleadings in this case, we grant in part and deny in part the Petition to Deny the instant assignment application, admonish Nexstar for a false certification in violation of Section 1.17(a)(2) of the Commission's rules, and deny the Petition to Deny the license renewal applications. Background. The Commission granted applications assigning Stations KFTA-TV (formerly KPOM-TV) and KNWA-TV (formerly KFAA(TV)) to Nexstar on December 21, 2004. In so doing, the Commission also granted a continuing satellite exception to the local television ownership rule to permit Station KNWA-TV to continue operating as a
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-504A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-504A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-504A1.txt
  • concludes that approval by Mexico for KRCA-DT's use of channel 35 should be able to be obtained more quickly, whereas coordination of channel 45 faces a number of obstacles that could prevent it from completing its post-transition DTV facilities by the end of the DTV transition. The Commission's interference analysis shows that the requested substitution of channel 35 would cause 1.17 percent interference to KMEX, Los Angeles, CA (analog channel 34, pre-transition digital channel 35, and post-transition digital channel 34), and 0.24 percent interference to KNBC, Los Angeles, CA (analog channel 4, digital channel 36 for both pre- and post-transition). Despite this, KRCA argues that licensees such as itself, with two out-of-core channels and facing international coordination issues, should be allowed
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-563A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-563A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-563A1.txt
  • for a downward adjustment in a forfeiture. Finally, the Region found that, contrary to CRC's request for a reduction based on CRC's history of compliance with the Rules, the president of CRC, James Kay, had a history of noncompliance. Specifically, in a prior proceeding, the Commission found that Kay deliberately withheld material information from the Commission, in violation of Section 1.17 of the Rules, and issued a forfeiture of $10,000 to Kay. Because of Kay's previous noncompliance, the Region declined to find that CRC has a history of compliance with the Rules. III. DISCUSSION Reconsideration is appropriate only where the petitioner either demonstrates a material error or omission in the underlying order or raises additional facts not known or not existing
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-759A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-759A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-759A1.txt
  • have submitted TRPs where basket indices and service bands have been aggregated even though some study area tariffs have been kept separated. Fields that require data entry are colored black; calculated fields are colored blue. Annual 1987 Access Tariff Filings, Petitions for Waivers of Filing Requirements, Mimeo No. 6945 (rel. Sept. 16, 1986) (1987 Waiver Order). See 47 C.F.R. § 1.17 (establishing requirement for truthful and accurate statements in commission matters, including ``any tariff proceeding''). 44 U.S.C. §§ 3506 et seq. OMB Control No. 3060-0400. (...continued from previous page) (continued....) Federal Communications Commission DA 08-759 Federal Communications Commission DA 08-759 " ¬ ÷ ø d � � F 0 0
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-778A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-778A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-778A1.txt
  • Sprint engaged in unreasonable and discriminatory practices in violation of sections 201(b) and 202 of the Communications Act by refusing to provide service through the toll-free telephone numbers 800-AMERICA and 888-AMERICA; and (2) Sprint engaged in misrepresentation to the Federal Communications Commission in its response to DeMoss's informal complaint, in violation of 18 U.S.C. section 1001 and 47 C.F.R. section 1.17. DeMoss further requested a separate damages proceeding under 47 C.F.R. section 1.722(d). III. DISCUSSION It is well established that the complainant has the burden of proof in a formal complaint proceeding under section 208 of the Act. Thus, to prevail, a complainant must demonstrate by a preponderance of the evidence that the alleged violation of the Act or the Commission's
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1198A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1198A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1198A1.txt
  • did not contain any certification information or other information from the Shenzhen Grant or CIC Grant. 47 C.F.R. § 2.925, 47 C.F.R. § 2.803(a)(1). Any false statement made knowingly and willfully in reply to this inquiry is punishable by fine or imprisonment under Title 18 of the U.S. Code. 18 U.S.C. §§ 1001 et seq; see also 47 C.F.R. § 1.17. 47 U.S.C. §§ 302a(b), 503(b), 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.111, 0.311, 1.80(f)(4), 2.803(a)(1). 47 U.S.C. § 403. 47 U.S.C. § 504(a). Federal Communications Commission DA 09-1198 Federal Communications Commission DA 09-1198 S T V $ � 4 0
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-119A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-119A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-119A1.txt
  • in the Section 503(b) context. See, e.g., Southern California Broadcasting Co., Memorandum Opinion and Order, 6 FCC Rcd 4387, 4387-88 ¶ 5 (1991) (``Southern California Broadcasting''). 47 U.S.C. § 154(i). 47 U.S.C. § 154(j). 47 U.S.C. § 403. 47 C.F.R. § 76.939 (``Cable operators shall comply with ... the Commission's requests for information, orders, and decisions.''). See 47 C.F.R. § 1.17. See, e.g., SBC Communications, Inc., Forfeiture Order, 17 FCC Rcd 7589, 7599-7600 ¶¶ 23-28 (2002) (ordering $100,000 forfeiture for egregious and intentional failure to certify the response to a Bureau inquiry) (``SBC Forfeiture Order''); Digital Antenna, Inc., Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture and Order, 23 FCC Rcd 7600, 7602 (Spectr. Enf. Div., Enf. Bur. 2008) (proposing $11,000 forfeiture for
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1513A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1513A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1513A1.txt
  • 6. We note that in a related matter that the Division issued a Notice of Apparent Liability to Inter Tech for its unauthorized marketing of a single, now discontinued transmitter, the Cybermax FF TX 1, in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act and Section 2.803(a) of the Rules, and for providing incorrect material factual information in violation of Section 1.17(a)(2) of the Rules. The Division action was limited to the discontinued transmitter only and did not address the transmitters subject to this proceeding. See Inter Tech FM, Notice of Apparently Liability for Forfeiture, 24 FCC Rcd 1151 (Enf. Bur., Spectrum Enf. Div. 2009), response pending. See First Response at 4. See also 47 C.F.R. § 73.1660(a)(1) (requiring AM, FM or
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1733A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1733A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1733A1.txt
  • its LOI Response, Jones failed to identify Vystar Credit Union as a nonprofit entity at that time. The Licensee's carelessness in its earlier filing resulted in an inaccurate conclusion in the NAL and wasted government resources. Although we will exclude the Vystar Credit Union announcement from our forfeiture calculation, we admonish Jones for its negligent misrepresentation in violation of Section 1.17 of our Rules, and caution the Licensee to exercise greater care in its responses to the Commission in the future. 13. Finally, Jones asserts that ``no penalty should be imposed, and that, should any penalty have been justified, it should have been no more than a nominal amount less than $500.'' We are unconvinced that either cancellation or a minimal
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1785A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1785A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1785A1.txt
  • that he confirmed that the station's signal was being received by local residents by turning on a television set to Channel 43. Iglesia has also provided letters from area residents confirming that the station was operating as represented. BLTTL-20071206AAM. Iglesia further advises that an application for a new site for modification of K43AG will be filed shortly. See also Section 1.17(a)(2) of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. §1.17(a)(2). Moreover, Section 73.1635 provides that special temporary authority (STA) must be sought to permit the operation of a broadcast facility for a limited period at variance from its authorization, and that authority must be received prior to the commencement of such operation. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1914. Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C. 20554
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1802A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1802A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1802A1.txt
  • Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), under authority delegated to the Chief, Media Bureau, by Section 0.283 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. §0.283. As set forth herein, we find and Tuck admits that it engaged in unauthorized construction and operation of K30IK in violation of Section 73.1745 of the Commission's Rules and made false certifications in violation of Sections 1.17 and 73.1015 of the Commission's Rules. By way of background, on June 1, 2004, Tuck sought a minor modification of the station's facilities (BMPTTL-20040601ADC). On January 18, 2005, Tuck tendered the above-captioned application (BLTTL-20050118AKJ) for a license to cover that construction. That application was granted February 16, 2005. Thereafter, on May 17, 2005, we granted Tuck's application (BPTTL-20050506ACL) for a
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1958A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1958A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1958A1.txt
  • representative may, in writing, require from any applicant, permittee, or licensee written statements of fact relevant to a determination whether an application should be granted or denied, or to a determination whether a license should be revoked, or to any other matter within the jurisdiction of the Commission'' and that any such statements are subject to the provisions of Section 1.17 of the Rules. Section 1.17 of the Rules requires that any person that receives a letter of inquiry from the Commission or its staff ``shall not intentionally provide material factual information that is incorrect or intentionally omit material information that is necessary to prevent any material factual statement that is made from being incorrect or misleading.'' As noted above, the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1994A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1994A2.txt
  • unscheduledandunpredictableeventssuchasbreakingnews,emergenciesand disastersmakesithighlydesirabletofacilitatetherapidandlessrestricted deploymentandoperationofENGsystemsfromonecountrytoanother, recognizing a)thatbroadcastingancillaryservicescanbeutilizedaspartofanadministration's telecommunications/informationandcommunicationtechnologies(ICTs)systems inserviceofmanagementinemergencyanddisastersituationsforearlywarning, prevention,mitigation,andrelief; b)thatRecommendationITU-RM.1824providessystemcharacteristicsof televisionoutsidebroadcast,electronicnewsgathering(ENG)andelectronicfield production(EFP)inthemobileserviceforuseinsharingstudies; 8 c)thatRecommendationITU-RF.1777providessystemcharacteristicsoftelevision outsidebroadcast,electronicnewsgatheringandelectronicfieldproductioninthe fixedserviceforuseinsharingstudies; d)thatalargenumberofbandsinMobileandFixedspectrumarealreadyusedto hostvariouselementsofelectronicnewsgatheringapplications; e)thatReportITU-RBT.2069providesspectrumusageandoperational characteristicsofterrestrialENG,televisionoutsidebroadcast(TVOB)andEFP systems, noting a)thatwhenaninternationalnewsworthyeventhappens,ENGoperationsmustbe deployedinaveryshorttime-frame; b)thatfrequencycoordinationmustbeundertakenwiththeAdministrationwhere aninternationalnews-worthyeventtakesplace; c)thatadvanceinformationonthefrequenciesavailableforENGuseinanygiven Administrationmayeaseinteroperabilityand/orinternetworking,especiallyin internationalnews-worthyeventsthatdrawbroadcastersregionallyorglobally, notingfurther a)thatitisintheinterestofadministrationsandbroadcasterstohaveaccessto updatedinformationonnationalspectrumplanningforENGuse, resolves 1toencourageadministrationstoassistthebroadcastingcommunityindeveloping adatabaseofcurrentlyavailableENGfrequencies,ENGtechnicalandoperational requirements,andspectrumauthorizationpointsofcontactasappropriate, instructstheDirectoroftheRadiocommunicationBureau 1)tomaintainalinkontheITU-Rwebsitetothebroadcastcommunity'sdatabase(s) referencedintheresolvesabove; 2)toreportontheprogressonthisResolutiontosubsequentWorld RadiocommunicationConferences, urgesadministrations 1)toprovidethebroadcastingcommunitywiththerelevantinformationconcerning theirnationalENGfrequencyallocations,ENGspectrummanagementpractices, andappropriatepoints-of-contactforENGusagewithintheiradministration; 2) toassistthebroadcastingcommunityinkeepingtheENGdatabasecurrent. Reason:ItisimportantthatinformationbeprovidedandmaintainedonENGusage aroundtheworld.ResolutionUSA-1.5/1providesamechanismtorationalizeENG spectrumusagebymaintainingadata-baseofcountryspecificENGbandswithrequired technicalandoperationalrequirementsfordeployment.ThiswillprovideENGusersand operatorswiththeneededinformationtoensurethattheydeployequipmentthatwill operatewithinagivencountryandallowthemtoseekspectrumuseapprovalinan expeditiousmanner.Itwillalsoprovidemanufacturerswithaknowledgebaseof 9 requiredfrequencybandsanddeploymentrequirementsneededtobuildcommon-use equipmentfortheworldwideENGmarket. 10 DOCUMENTWAC/OSO(Ol.09.09) UnitedStatesofAmerica DRAFTPROPOSALFORTHEWORKOFTHECONFERENCE Agendaitem1.17: toconsiderresultsofsharingstudiesbetweenthemobileserviceand otherservicesintheband790-862MHzinRegions1and3,inaccordancewithResolution749 (WRC-07),toensuretheadequateprotectionofservicestowhichthisfrequencybandis allocated,andtakeappropriateaction; Background: Thetransitiontodigitaltelevisionisunderwayinmanycountriesworldwide.Theeventual globaltransitiontodigitaltelevisionwillmakespectrumavailableforintroductionofthenew services,includingnextgenerationwirelessservices.TheWRC-lldecisionsundertheAgenda Item1.17aretherefore,importanttooperators,manufacturersand,mostimportantly,consumers worldwide. AtWRC-07,thereweredifficultdiscussionssurroundingthefutureuseofthe790-862MHzband inRegion1andintheend FN5.316Bwasagreedallocating790-862MHztotheMobileservice, exceptaeronautical,onaprimarybasisstartingfrom17June2015,theDTVtransitiondateinthe GE06Agreement.Thefootnotealsostatesthattheuseofstationsofthemobileserviceissubject tothesuccessfulapplicationoftheproceduresoftheGE06Agreementforthosecountriesparty toit. FN5.316wasupdatedandFN5.316Awasdeveloped,allocating790-862MHztothe Mobileservicein65Region1countrieseffectiveimmediatelyandinforceuntil16June2015. FN5.317AidentifiesforIMTthosepartsoftheband790-960MHzinRegion1whichare allocatedtotheMobileserviceonaprimarybasis. DuetotheextensivedebatesinRegion1concerningthisband,Resolution 749(WRC-07): Studiesontheuseoftheband790-862MHzbymobileapplicationsandbyotherservices,was developed. TheGE06AgreementcontainsaplanfordigitalTVcoveringfrequenciesincludingthe790-862 MHzbandinRegionl(partsofRegion1situatedtothewestofmeridian170°eastandnOlthof parallel40°south,excepttheterritoryofMongolia)andonecountryinRegion3TheGE06 Agreementalsocontainsregulatoryprovisionsconcerningsharingbetweentheterrestrial broadcastingserviceandotherterrestrialservices,aswellasthelistofotherprimaryterrestrial services.TheGE06Agreementappearstoprovidesufficientregulatoryframeworktoaddress sharingissuebetweenthemobileserviceandotherservicesintheband790-862MHzbetween countriesthataresignatoriestothisagreement. WithregardtoRegion3,itisimportanttorecognizethatallocationtothemobileserviceinthe band790-862MHzhasbeenineffectsinceWARC-71.Iftherehavebeennoreportedinstances ofinterference,thenthisshouldbetakenintoaccountwhenconsideringanyregulatorychanges. 11 WithregardtoRegion2,WRC-07allocatedtheband698-806MHztothemobileserviceona co-primarybasisandidentifieditforusebyIMTsystems.SomeRegion2administrationshave successfullycompletedtherealignmentofallocationsinthisspectrumwhileothersare progressingtowardsthatgoal. Inaddition,WRC-07determinedthatthereisnoneedtoconducta furtherreviewoftheregulatoryprovisionsconcerningtheuseoftheband790-862MHzin Region2.ThatdecisionisexplicitlyaffirmedintheAgendaItem1.17andtheassociated Resolution749(WRC-07). Proposal: ARTICLE5 Frequencyallocations SectionIV-TableofFrequencyAllocations (SeeNo.2.1) ***** USA/1.17/1 NOC 12 460-890MHz Allocationtoservices Region1 Region2 Region3 460-470
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2548A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2548A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2548A1.txt
  • 5 FCC Rcd 3252 (1990) (1990 Character Policy Statement), Memorandum Opinion and Order, 6 FCC Rcd 3448 (1991), Memorandum Opinion and Order, 7 FCC Rcd 6564 (1992). The Commission applies its broadcast character standards to applicants and licensees in the other radio services. See, e.g., 1990 Character Policy Statement, 5 FCC Rcd at 3253, para. 10 (adopting 47 C.F.R. § 1.17 to apply prohibition against misrepresentations and material omissions to applicants, licensees, and permittees in all radio services). In prior merger orders, the Commission has also used the Commission's character policy in the broadcast area as guidance in resolving similar questions in transfer of licenses proceedings. See, e.g., Applications Filed for the Transfer of Certain Spectrum Licenses and Section 214 Authorizations
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2548A1_Rcd.pdf
  • 5 FCC Rcd 3252 (1990) (1990 Character Policy Statement), Memorandum Opinion and Order, 6 FCC Rcd 3448 (1991), Memorandum Opinion and Order, 7 FCC Rcd 6564 (1992). The Commission applies its broadcast character standards to applicants and licensees in the other radio services. See, e.g., 1990 Character Policy Statement, 5 FCC Rcd at 3253, para. 10 (adopting 47 C.F.R. § 1.17 to apply prohibition against misrepresentations and material omissions to applicants, licensees, and permittees in all radio services). In prior merger orders, the Commission has also used the Commission's character policyin the broadcast area as guidance in resolving similar questions in transfer of licenses proceedings. See, e.g., Applications Filed for the Transfer of Certain Spectrum Licenses and Section 214 Authorizations in
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2584A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2584A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2584A1.txt
  • 2009 Released: December 14, 2009 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: In this Order, we adopt the attached Consent Decree entered into between the Enforcement Bureau and BNSF Railway Company (``BNSF''). The Consent Decree terminates an investigation by the Bureau of BNSF's compliance with Section 310(d) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, relating to assignments of licenses, and Section 1.17 of the Commission's Rules, relating to truthful statements to the Commission. The Bureau and BNSF have negotiated the terms of the Consent Decree that resolve this matter. A copy of the Consent Decree is attached hereto and incorporated by reference. After reviewing the terms of the Consent Decree and evaluating the facts before us, we find that the public interest
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2584A2.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2584A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2584A2.txt
  • 201032080013 FRN No. 0004772877 CONSENT DECREE The Enforcement Bureau of the Federal Communications Commission and BNSF Railway Company, by their authorized representatives, hereby enter into this Consent Decree for the purpose of resolving the Enforcement Bureau's investigation of compliance by BNSF Railway Company with Section 310(d) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. § 310(d), and Sections 1.17 and 1.948 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.17, 1.948. I. DEFINITIONS For purposes of this Consent Decree, the following definitions shall apply: ``Act'' means the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. § 151 et seq. ``Adopting Order'' means an order of the Bureau adopting this Consent Decree without any modifications adverse to BNSF Railway Company. ``Any''
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-51A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-51A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-51A1.txt
  • whether or when it was actually utilized. Id. Being uncertain whether the purported revision was ever substituted for the earlier promotional text, we will not consider PRC's broadcast of any of the post-September 2004 Rockin' Tomato Pizza Co. announcements in conjunction with our determination of the forfeiture amount. See generally, November 17th Reply. See id.; see also 47 C.F.R. § 1.17. See September 13th Response at 5-6. See id. See id. See 47 U.S.C. § 503(b); 47 C.F.R § 1.80. The Commission's Forfeiture Policy Statement and Amendment of Section 1.80 of the Rules to Incorporate the Forfeiture Guidelines, 12 FCC Rcd 17087, 17115 (1997) (``Forfeiture Policy Statement''), recon. denied 15 FCC Rcd 303 (1999); 47 C.F.R. § 1.80(b). 47 U.S.C. §
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-660A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-660A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-660A1.txt
  • June 29, 2008, regarding the effects of the proposals on the quality of the human environment. For the reasons set forth below, we: (1) find that no further environmental processing is warranted; (2) grant the KBEN/KWHO Objection and KROW Objection to the extent indicated herein, and otherwise deny them; (3) admonish White Park for its apparent willful violation of Section 1.17 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), and (4) grant the Applications. II. BACKGROUND White Park was the successful bidder in FM Auction No. 37 for an FM frequency in Lovell, Wyoming, and it was the successful bidder in FM Auction No. 62 for several FM frequencies, including Basin and Cody, Wyoming. White Park's subsequent ``long-form'' applications for those frequencies were
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-667A2.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-667A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-667A2.txt
  • or other principal of the licensee. Send the response to EEO Staff, Policy Division, Media Bureau, Federal Communications Commission, 445 12th Street, S.W., Washington, DC 20554. To knowingly and willfully make any false statement or conceal any material fact in response to this audit is punishable by fine or imprisonment (see 18 U.S.C. § 1001; see also 47 C.F.R. § 1.17), revocation of any station license or construction permit (47 U.S.C. § 312(a)(1)), and/or forfeiture (47 U.S.C. § 503). Failure to respond to this audit letter by the deadline is also punishable by sanctions in accordance with 47 C.F.R. § 73.2080(g). 6. In accordance with 47 C.F.R. § 73.3526(e)(10) (for commercial stations ) and 47 C.F.R. § 73.3527(e)(11) (for noncommercial educational
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-684A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-684A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-684A1.txt
  • have submitted TRPs where basket indices and service bands have been aggregated even though some study area tariffs have been kept separated. Fields that require data entry are colored black; calculated fields are colored blue. Annual 1987 Access Tariff Filings, Petitions for Waivers of Filing Requirements, Mimeo No. 6945 (rel. Sept. 16, 1986) (1987 Waiver Order). See 47 C.F.R. § 1.17 (establishing requirement for truthful and accurate statements in commission matters, including ``any tariff proceeding''). 44 U.S.C. §§ 3506 et seq. OMB Control No. 3060-0400. (...continued from previous page) (continued....) Federal Communications Commission DA 09-684 Federal Communications Commission DA 09-684 9 : é ê ¢ � F 0 0 Â Ï Â Ï
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-763A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-763A2.txt
  • this agenda item. Therefore, the definition and scope of the agenda item is unclear. U.S. VIEW: The United States supports ITU-R studies concerning the fixed service bands between 71 and 238 GHz. The United States supports protection of the existing services allocated within this frequency range. 17 Document WAC/025(31.03.09) UNITED STATES OF AMERICA DRAFT PRELIMINARY VIEWS ON WRC-11 AGENDA ITEM 1.17: to consider the results of sharing studies between the mobile service and other services in the band 790-862 MHz in Regions 1 and 3, in accordance with Resolution 749 (WRC-07), to ensure the adequate protection of services to which the frequency band is allocated, and to take regulatory actions as appropriate ISSUE: The main issue is to avoid impact on
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-79A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-79A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-79A1.txt
  • in the Section 503(b) context. See, e.g., Southern California Broadcasting Co., Memorandum Opinion and Order, 6 FCC Rcd 4387, 4387-88 ¶ 5 (1991) (``Southern California Broadcasting''). 47 U.S.C. § 154(i). 47 U.S.C. § 154(j). 47 U.S.C. § 403. 47 C.F.R. § 76.939 (``Cable operators shall comply with ... the Commission's requests for information, orders, and decisions.''). See 47 C.F.R. § 1.17. See, e.g., SBC Communications, Inc., Forfeiture Order, 17 FCC Rcd 7589, 7599-7600 ¶¶ 23-28 (ordering $100,000 forfeiture for egregious and intentional failure to certify the response to a Bureau inquiry) (``SBC Forfeiture Order''); Globcom, Inc., Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture and Order, 18 FCC Rcd 19893, 19898 n. 36 (2003) (noting delayed response to an LOI is considered dilatory
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-80A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-80A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-80A1.txt
  • in the Section 503(b) context. See, e.g., Southern California Broadcasting Co., Memorandum Opinion and Order, 6 FCC Rcd 4387, 4387-88 ¶ 5 (1991) (``Southern California Broadcasting''). 47 U.S.C. § 154(i). 47 U.S.C. § 154(j). 47 U.S.C. § 403. 47 C.F.R. § 76.939 (``Cable operators shall comply with ... the Commission's requests for information, orders, and decisions.''). See 47 C.F.R. § 1.17. See, e.g., SBC Communications, Inc., Forfeiture Order, 17 FCC Rcd 7589, 7599-7600 ¶¶ 23-28 (2002) (ordering $100,000 forfeiture for egregious and intentional failure to certify the response to a Bureau inquiry) (``SBC Forfeiture Order''); Digital Antenna, Inc., Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture and Order, 23 FCC Rcd 7600, 7602 (Spectr. Enf. Div., Enf. Bur. 2008) (proposing $11,000 forfeiture for
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-81A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-81A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-81A1.txt
  • in the Section 503(b) context. See, e.g., Southern California Broadcasting Co., Memorandum Opinion and Order, 6 FCC Rcd 4387, 4387-88 ¶ 5 (1991) (``Southern California Broadcasting''). 47 U.S.C. § 154(i). 47 U.S.C. § 154(j). 47 U.S.C. § 403. 47 C.F.R. § 76.939 (``Cable operators shall comply with ... the Commission's requests for information, orders, and decisions.''). See 47 C.F.R. § 1.17. See, e.g., SBC Communications, Inc., Forfeiture Order, 17 FCC Rcd 7589, 7599-7600 ¶¶ 23-28 (2002) (ordering $100,000 forfeiture for egregious and intentional failure to certify the response to a Bureau inquiry) (``SBC Forfeiture Order''); Digital Antenna, Inc., Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture and Order, 23 FCC Rcd 7600, 7602 (Spectr. Enf. Div., Enf. Bur. 2008) (proposing $11,000 forfeiture for
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-82A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-82A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-82A1.txt
  • in the Section 503(b) context. See, e.g., Southern California Broadcasting Co., Memorandum Opinion and Order, 6 FCC Rcd 4387, 4387-88 ¶ 5 (1991) (``Southern California Broadcasting''). 47 U.S.C. § 154(i). 47 U.S.C. § 154(j). 47 U.S.C. § 403. 47 C.F.R. § 76.939 (``Cable operators shall comply with ... the Commission's requests for information, orders, and decisions.''). See 47 C.F.R. § 1.17. See, e.g., SBC Communications, Inc., Forfeiture Order, 17 FCC Rcd 7589, 7599-7600 ¶¶ 23-28 (2002) (ordering $100,000 forfeiture for egregious and intentional failure to certify the response to a Bureau inquiry) (``SBC Forfeiture Order''); Digital Antenna, Inc., Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture and Order, 23 FCC Rcd 7600, 7602 (Spectr. Enf. Div., Enf. Bur. 2008) (proposing $11,000 forfeiture for
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-83A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-83A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-83A1.txt
  • in the Section 503(b) context. See, e.g., Southern California Broadcasting Co., Memorandum Opinion and Order, 6 FCC Rcd 4387, 4387-88 ¶ 5 (1991) (``Southern California Broadcasting''). 47 U.S.C. § 154(i). 47 U.S.C. § 154(j). 47 U.S.C. § 403. 47 C.F.R. § 76.939 (``Cable operators shall comply with ... the Commission's requests for information, orders, and decisions.''). See 47 C.F.R. § 1.17. See, e.g., SBC Communications, Inc., Forfeiture Order, 17 FCC Rcd 7589, 7599-7600 ¶¶ 23-28 (ordering $100,000 forfeiture for egregious and intentional failure to certify the response to a Bureau inquiry) (``SBC Forfeiture Order''); Digital Antenna, Inc., Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture and Order, 23 FCC Rcd 7600, 7602 (Spectr. Enf. Div., Enf. Bur. 2008) (proposing $11,000 forfeiture for failure
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-84A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-84A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-84A1.txt
  • in the Section 503(b) context. See, e.g., Southern California Broadcasting Co., Memorandum Opinion and Order, 6 FCC Rcd 4387, 4387-88 ¶ 5 (1991) (``Southern California Broadcasting''). 47 U.S.C. § 154(i). 47 U.S.C. § 154(j). 47 U.S.C. § 403. 47 C.F.R. § 76.939 (``Cable operators shall comply with ... the Commission's requests for information, orders, and decisions.''). See 47 C.F.R. § 1.17. See, e.g., SBC Communications, Inc., Forfeiture Order, 17 FCC Rcd 7589, 7599-7600 ¶¶ 23-28 (ordering $100,000 forfeiture for egregious and intentional failure to certify the response to a Bureau inquiry) (``SBC Forfeiture Order''); Digital Antenna, Inc., Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture and Order, 23 FCC Rcd 7600, 7602 (Spectr. Enf. Div., Enf. Bur. 2008) (proposing $11,000 forfeiture for failure
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-85A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-85A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-85A1.txt
  • in the Section 503(b) context. See, e.g., Southern California Broadcasting Co., Memorandum Opinion and Order, 6 FCC Rcd 4387, 4387-88 ¶ 5 (1991) (``Southern California Broadcasting''). 47 U.S.C. § 154(i). 47 U.S.C. § 154(j). 47 U.S.C. § 403. 47 C.F.R. § 76.939 (``Cable operators shall comply with ... the Commission's requests for information, orders, and decisions.''). See 47 C.F.R. § 1.17. See, e.g., SBC Communications, Inc., Forfeiture Order, 17 FCC Rcd 7589, 7599-7600 ¶¶ 23-28 (2002) (ordering $100,000 forfeiture for egregious and intentional failure to certify the response to a Bureau inquiry) (``SBC Forfeiture Order''); Digital Antenna, Inc., Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture and Order, 23 FCC Rcd 7600, 7602 (Spectr. Enf. Div., Enf. Bur. 2008) (proposing $11,000 forfeiture for
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-95A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-95A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-95A1.txt
  • in the Section 503(b) context. See, e.g., Southern California Broadcasting Co., Memorandum Opinion and Order, 6 FCC Rcd 4387, 4387-88 ¶ 5 (1991) (``Southern California Broadcasting''). 47 U.S.C. § 154(i). 47 U.S.C. § 154(j). 47 U.S.C. § 403. 47 C.F.R. § 76.939 (``Cable operators shall comply with ... the Commission's requests for information, orders, and decisions.''). See 47 C.F.R. § 1.17. See, e.g., SBC Communications, Inc., Forfeiture Order, 17 FCC Rcd 7589, 7599-7600 ¶¶ 23-28 (2002) (ordering $100,000 forfeiture for egregious and intentional failure to certify the response to a Bureau inquiry) (``SBC Forfeiture Order''); Digital Antenna, Inc., Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture and Order, 23 FCC Rcd 7600, 7602 (Spectr. Enf. Div., Enf. Bur. 2008) (proposing $11,000 forfeiture for
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1268A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1268A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1268A1.txt
  • Section II. Adjustment Criteria for Section 503 Forfeitures. See The Commission's Forfeiture Policy Statement and Amendment of Section 1.80 of the Rules to Incorporate the Forfeiture Guidelines, Report and Order, 12 FCC Rcd 17087 (1997), recon. denied, 15 FCC Rcd 303 (1999) (``Forfeiture Policy Statement''). Forfeiture Policy Statement, 12 FCC Rcd at 17099 ¶ 22. See id. Amendment of Section 1.17 of the Commission's Rules Concerning Truthful Statements to the Commission, Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, 17 FCC Rcd 3296, 3297 (2002). See also Amendment of Section 1.17 of the Commission's Rules Concerning Truthful Statements to the Commission Report and Order, 18 FCC Rcd 4016, 4021 (2003), recon. denied, Memorandum Opinion and Order, 19 FCC Rcd 5790, further recon. denied, Memorandum Opinion
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1554A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1554A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1554A1.txt
  • 5 FCC Rcd 3252 (1990) (``1990 Character Policy Statement''), Memorandum Opinion and Order, 6 FCC Rcd 3448 (1991), Memorandum Opinion and Order, 7 FCC Rcd 6564 (1992). The Commission applies its broadcast character standards to applicants and licensees in the other radio services. See, e.g., 1990 Character Policy Statement, 5 FCC Rcd at 3253 ¶ 10 (adopting 47 C.F.R. § 1.17 to apply prohibition against misrepresentations and material omissions to applicants, licensees, and permittees in all radio services). See, e.g., AT&T-Verizon Wireless Order at ¶ 27; AT&T-Centennial Order, 24 FCC Rcd at 13930 ¶ 32; Verizon Wireless-ALLTEL Order, 23 FCC Rcd at 17464 ¶ 32; Sprint Nextel-Clearwire Order, 23 FCC Rcd at 17582-83 ¶ 23; Cingular-AT&T Wireless Order, 19 FCC Rcd
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1554A1_Rcd.pdf
  • found qualified to hold Commission licenses. We therefore find that there is no reason to re-evaluate the basic qualifications of Verizon Wireless. (Continued from previous page) (1992). The Commission applies its broadcast character standards to applicants and licensees in the other radio services. See, e.g., 1990 Character Policy Statement, 5 FCC Rcd at 3253 ¶ 10 (adopting 47 C.F.R. § 1.17 to apply prohibition against misrepresentations and material omissions to applicants, licensees, and permittees in all radio services). 106See, e.g., AT&T-Verizon Wireless Order at ¶ 27;AT&T-Centennial Order, 24 FCC Rcd at 13930 ¶ 32; Verizon Wireless-ALLTEL Order, 23 FCC Rcd at 17464 ¶ 32; Sprint Nextel-Clearwire Order, 23 FCC Rcd at 17582-83 ¶23; Cingular-AT&T Wireless Order, 19 FCC Rcd at 21548
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1921A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1921A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1921A1.txt
  • failure to be fully informative, accompanied by intent to deceive.'' Intent to deceive is established if a licensee knowingly makes a false statement and can also be inferred when the surrounding circumstances clearly show the existence of intent to deceive. The Commission may disqualify an applicant who deliberately makes misrepresentations or lacks candor in dealing with the agency. Moreover, Section 1.17(a)(2) of the Rules provides that no person may provide, in any written statement of fact, ``material factual information that is incorrect or omit material information that is necessary to prevent any material factual statement that is made from being incorrect or misleading without a reasonable basis for believing that any such material factual statement is correct and not misleading.'' Thus,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1975A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1975A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1975A1.txt
  • File No. EB-09-SE-242; Provision of Incorrect Material Factual Information in a Commission Investigation Dear Mr. McCormack: This is an official CITATION, issued pursuant to section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Communications Act''), to Phonejammer.com (``Phonejammer'') for providing incorrect, material factual information to the Spectrum Enforcement Division (``Division'') of the Enforcement Bureau (``Bureau'') in violation of section 1.17(a)(2) of the Commission's rules (``Rules''). Specifically, in response to recent Commission inquiries, Phonejammer claimed that it does not market, and has not shipped or distributed, radio frequency devices designed to intentionally interfere with licensed cellular and Personal Communications Services (``PCS'') (``phone jammers'') to consumers in the United States. However, these statements are flatly contradicted by record evidence that, as recently
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2064A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2064A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2064A1.txt
  • and have violated Section 73.858 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'') because they are not separately incorporated with a local presence and mission. Lawyers Guild also claims that Applicants have violated the LPFM multiple-ownership Rules because EWTN and Starboard own translators in the area. Next, Lawyers Guild avers that Applicants misrepresented their true identity to the Commission, a violation of Section 1.17 of the Rules. Finally, Lawyers Guild maintains that Applicants' proposed retransmission of EWTN's network programming violates Section 73.879 of the Rules. In response, Applicants claim to be wholly independent of EWTN and state that it played no part in the application process, but that Starboard, a nonprofit corporation dedicated to dissemination of the Roman Catholic Church's teachings, recruited the Applicants
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2094A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2094A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2094A1.txt
  • (Tampa Office, May 16, 2006) (finding Rama violated, among other Rules, Section 73.3526(e)(13)); Rama Communications, Inc., NOV No. V20053270002 (Tampa Office, November 1, 2004) (finding Rama violated, among other Rules, Sections 73.3526(e)(8) and 73.3526(e)(12)). We further remind Rama that licensees have a duty to be truthful and candid with the Commission in all written and oral communications. See 47 C.F.R. §1.17. In addition to monetary forfeitures, violations of this duty also may subject licensees to license revocation or non-renewal. See, e.g., 47 U.S.C. §312(a)(1). 47 U.S.C. § 503(b); 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.111, 0.311, 0.314, 1.80, 73.1125(a), 73.3526. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1914. (...continued from previous page) (continued....) Federal Communications Commission DA 10-2094 Federal Communications Commission DA 10-2094 $ Æ � F
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2187A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2187A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2187A1.txt
  • corresponding with the Commission. Under the Privacy Act of 1974, any statement or information provided by you may be used by the Commission to determine if further enforcement action is required. Any knowingly or willfully false statement, or concealment of any material fact, made in reply to this Citation is punishable by fine or imprisonment. Please also note that Section 1.17 of the Rules requires that you provide truthful and accurate statements to the Commission. CONTACT INFORMATION The closest FCC Office is the Los Angeles District Office in Cerritos, CA. You may contact this office by telephone, 562-860-7474, to schedule a personal interview, which must take place within thirty (30) days after the release date of this Citation. or call the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2188A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2188A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2188A1.txt
  • corresponding with the Commission. Under the Privacy Act of 1974, any statement or information provided by you may be used by the Commission to determine if further enforcement action is required. Any knowingly or willfully false statement, or concealment of any material fact, made in reply to this Citation is punishable by fine or imprisonment. Please also note that Section 1.17 of the Rules requires that you provide truthful and accurate statements to the Commission. CONTACT INFORMATION The closest FCC Office is the Los Angeles District Office in Cerritos, CA. You may contact this office by telephone, 562-860-7474, to schedule a personal interview, which must take place within thirty (30) days after the release date of this Citation. or call the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2189A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2189A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2189A1.txt
  • corresponding with the Commission. Under the Privacy Act of 1974, any statement or information provided by you may be used by the Commission to determine if further enforcement action is required. Any knowingly or willfully false statement, or concealment of any material fact, made in reply to this Citation is punishable by fine or imprisonment. Please also note that Section 1.17 of the Rules requires that you provide truthful and accurate statements to the Commission. CONTACT INFORMATION The closest FCC Office is the Los Angeles District Office in Cerritos, CA. You may contact this office by telephone, 562-860-7474, to schedule a personal interview, which must take place within thirty (30) days after the release date of this Citation. or call the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2190A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2190A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2190A1.txt
  • corresponding with the Commission. Under the Privacy Act of 1974, any statement or information provided by you may be used by the Commission to determine if further enforcement action is required. Any knowingly or willfully false statement, or concealment of any material fact, made in reply to this Citation is punishable by fine or imprisonment. Please also note that Section 1.17 of the Rules requires that you provide truthful and accurate statements to the Commission. CONTACT INFORMATION The closest FCC Office is the Denver Field Office in Denver, Colorado. You may contact this office by telephone, (303)231-5212, to schedule a personal interview, which must take place within twenty (20) days after the release date of this Citation. or call the Consumer
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2191A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2191A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2191A1.txt
  • corresponding with the Commission. Under the Privacy Act of 1974, any statement or information provided by you may be used by the Commission to determine if further enforcement action is required. Any knowingly or willfully false statement, or concealment of any material fact, made in reply to this Citation is punishable by fine or imprisonment. Please also note that Section 1.17 of the Rules requires that you provide truthful and accurate statements to the Commission. CONTACT INFORMATION The closest FCC Office is the Denver Field Office in Denver, Colorado. You may contact this office by telephone, (303)231-5212, to schedule a personal interview, which must take place within twenty (20) days after the release date of this Citation. or call the Consumer
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2192A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2192A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2192A1.txt
  • corresponding with the Commission. Under the Privacy Act of 1974, any statement or information provided by you may be used by the Commission to determine if further enforcement action is required. Any knowingly or willfully false statement, or concealment of any material fact, made in reply to this Citation is punishable by fine or imprisonment. Please also note that Section 1.17 of the Rules requires that you provide truthful and accurate statements to the Commission. CONTACT INFORMATION The closest FCC Office is the Denver Field Office in Denver, Colorado. You may contact this office by telephone, (303)231-5212, to schedule a personal interview, which must take place within twenty (20) days after the release date of this Citation. or call the Consumer
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2193A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2193A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2193A1.txt
  • corresponding with the Commission. Under the Privacy Act of 1974, any statement or information provided by you may be used by the Commission to determine if further enforcement action is required. Any knowingly or willfully false statement, or concealment of any material fact, made in reply to this Citation is punishable by fine or imprisonment. Please also note that Section 1.17 of the Rules requires that you provide truthful and accurate statements to the Commission. CONTACT INFORMATION The closest FCC Office is the Denver Field Office in Denver, Colorado. You may contact this office by telephone, (303)231-5212, to schedule a personal interview, which must take place within twenty (20) days after the release date of this Citation. or call the Consumer
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2194A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2194A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2194A1.txt
  • corresponding with the Commission. Under the Privacy Act of 1974, any statement or information provided by you may be used by the Commission to determine if further enforcement action is required. Any knowingly or willfully false statement, or concealment of any material fact, made in reply to this Citation is punishable by fine or imprisonment. Please also note that Section 1.17 of the Rules requires that you provide truthful and accurate statements to the Commission. CONTACT INFORMATION The closest FCC Office is the Denver Field Office in Denver, Colorado. You may contact this office by telephone, (303)231-5212, to schedule a personal interview, which must take place within twenty (20) days after the release date of this Citation. or call the Consumer
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2195A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2195A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2195A1.txt
  • corresponding with the Commission. Under the Privacy Act of 1974, any statement or information provided by you may be used by the Commission to determine if further enforcement action is required. Any knowingly or willfully false statement, or concealment of any material fact, made in reply to this Citation is punishable by fine or imprisonment. Please also note that Section 1.17 of the Rules requires that you provide truthful and accurate statements to the Commission. CONTACT INFORMATION The closest FCC Office is the Denver Field Office in Denver, Colorado. You may contact this office by telephone, (303)231-5212, to schedule a personal interview, which must take place within twenty (20) days after the release date of this Citation. or call the Consumer
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2220A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2220A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2220A1.txt
  • corresponding with the Commission. Under the Privacy Act of 1974, any statement or information provided by you may be used by the Commission to determine if further enforcement action is required. Any knowingly or willfully false statement, or concealment of any material fact, made in reply to this Citation is punishable by fine or imprisonment. Please also note that Section 1.17 of the Rules requires that you provide truthful and accurate statements to the Commission. CONTACT INFORMATION The closest FCC Office is the Atlanta Office, in Duluth, Georgia. You may contact Neal McNeil by telephone, 202-418-1160, to schedule a personal interview, which must take place within thirty (30) days after the release date of this Citation. or call the Consumer &
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2240A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2240A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2240A1.txt
  • corresponding with the Commission. Under the Privacy Act of 1974, any statement or information provided by you may be used by the Commission to determine if further enforcement action is required. Any knowingly or willfully false statement, or concealment of any material fact, made in reply to this Citation is punishable by fine or imprisonment. Please also note that Section 1.17 of the Rules requires that you provide truthful and accurate statements to the Commission. CONTACT INFORMATION The closest FCC Office is the Seattle Field Office in Kirkland, Washington. You may contact Salomon Satche by telephone, (301) 725-1996, to schedule a personal interview, which must take place within thirty (30) days after the release date of this Citation. You should send
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2295A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2295A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2295A1.txt
  • corresponding with the Commission. Under the Privacy Act of 1974, any statement or information provided by you may be used by the Commission to determine if further enforcement action is required. Any knowingly or willfully false statement, or concealment of any material fact, made in reply to this Citation is punishable by fine or imprisonment. Please also note that Section 1.17 of the Rules requires that you provide truthful and accurate statements to the Commission. CONTACT INFORMATION The closest FCC Office is the Seattle Field Office in Kirkland, Washington. You may contact Salomon Satche by telephone, (301) 725-1996, to schedule a personal interview, which must take place within thirty (30) days after the release date of this Citation. You should send
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-506A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-506A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-506A1.txt
  • have submitted TRPs where basket indices and service bands have been aggregated even though some study area tariffs have been kept separated. Fields that require data entry are colored black; calculated fields are colored blue. Annual 1987 Access Tariff Filings, Petitions for Waivers of Filing Requirements, Mimeo No. 6945 (rel. Sept. 16, 1986) (1987 Waiver Order). See 47 C.F.R. § 1.17 (establishing requirement for truthful and accurate statements in commission matters, including ``any tariff proceeding''). 44 U.S.C. §§ 3506 et seq. OMB Control No. 3060-0400. (...continued from previous page) (continued....) Federal Communications Commission DA 10-506 Federal Communications Commission DA 10-506 " ¬ ÷ ø d � F - š€ 0 š€ 0 ' - ¤ ¨ - -
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-637A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-637A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-637A1.txt
  • may officially notice, the petitioner has presented a ``substantial and material question of fact'' to warrant further inquiry. As an initial matter, we note that KLEI-TV is now licensed on digital channel 25 has terminated analog television service on channel 6, and therefore Cedar Cove's Channel 6 argument is now moot. With respect to Cedar Cove's false certification argument, Section 1.17(a)(2) of the Rules provides that no person may provide, in any written statement of fact, ``material factual information that is incorrect or omit material information that is necessary to prevent any material factual statement that is made from being incorrect or misleading without a reasonable basis for believing that any such material factual statement is correct and not misleading.'' In
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-661A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-661A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-661A1.txt
  • 5 FCC Rcd 3252 (1990) (``1990 Character Policy Statement''), Memorandum Opinion and Order, 6 FCC Rcd 3448 (1991), Memorandum Opinion and Order, 7 FCC Rcd 6564 (1992). The Commission applies its broadcast character standards to applicants and licensees in the other radio services. See, e.g., 1990 Character Policy Statement, 5 FCC Rcd at 3253 ¶ 10 (adopting 47 C.F.R. § 1.17 to apply prohibition against misrepresentations and material omissions to applicants, licensees, and permittees in all radio services). See, e.g., AT&T-Centennial Order, 24 FCC Rcd at 13930 ¶ 32; Verizon Wireless-ALLTEL Order, 23 FCC Rcd at 17464 ¶ 32; Sprint Nextel-Clearwire Order, 23 FCC Rcd at 17582-83 ¶ 23; Cingular-AT&T Wireless Order, 19 FCC Rcd at 21548 ¶ 47. See, e.g.,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-661A1_Rcd.pdf
  • Statement and Order,5 FCC Rcd 3252 (1990) ("1990 Character Policy Statement"), Memorandum Opinion and Order, 6 FCC Rcd 3448(1991), Memorandum Opinion and Order,7 FCC Rcd 6564 (1992). The Commission applies its broadcast character standards to applicants and licensees in the other radio services. See, e.g., 1990 Character Policy Statement, 5 FCC Rcd at 3253 ¶ 10 (adopting 47 C.F.R. § 1.17 to apply prohibition against misrepresentations and material omissions to applicants, licensees, and permittees in all radio services). 102See, e.g., AT&T-Centennial Order, 24 FCC Rcd at 13930 ¶ 32; Verizon Wireless-ALLTEL Order, 23 FCC Rcd at 17464 ¶ 32; Sprint Nextel-Clearwire Order, 23 FCC Rcd at 17582-83 ¶23; Cingular-AT&T Wireless Order, 19 FCC Rcd at 21548 ¶ 47. 103See, e.g., AT&T-Centennial
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-669A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-669A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-669A1.txt
  • 2. See LOI at 3. 47 U.S.C. § 302a(b). 47 C.F.R. § 2.803(a). , as ``[a] device that intentionally generates and emits radio frequency energy by radiation or induction.'' 47 C.F.R. §§ 2.1031-2.1060. 47 C.F.R. § 15.201(b). 47 C.F.R. § 2.803(g). 47 U.S.C. § 333. We note that although the Citation did not specifically address Phonejammer's behavior as a Section 1.17(a)(2) violation, 47 C.F.R. § 1.17(a)(2), the Citation emphasized that evidence gathered from Phonejammer's website clearly contradicted Phonejammer's claim that it did not market its phone jammers to individuals in the United States. Moreover, the Citation noted that Phonejammer failed to attest to the truth and accuracy of the information in its response. We will issue a separate Citation to Phonejammer
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-702A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-702A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-702A1.txt
  • for the reasons stated below, we: (1) dismiss the License Objection as moot; (2) grant in part and deny in all other respects the Modification and Supplemental Objections; (3) grant the Modification Application; and (4) conclude that Saga is apparently liable for a monetary forfeiture in the amount of ten thousand dollars ($10,000) for false certification in violation of Section 1.17(a)(2) of the Rules. II. BACKGROUND The Station is currently licensed to operate on Channel 238 with two directional Scala HDCA 10-element antennas located at 105 feet and 50 feet height above ground level (``AGL''), directed at six degrees and 295 degrees true, respectively. On July 27, 2007, the staff granted Finger Lakes' proposal to move WFIZ(FM) from Channel 240 at
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-91A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-91A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-91A1.txt
  • include number of complaints, broken down by category or complaint, e.g., instances of improper access by employees, instances of improper disclosure to individuals not authorized to receive the information, or instances of improper access to online information by individuals not authorized to view the information.] The company represents and warrants that the above certification is consistent with 47. C.F.R. § 1.17 which requires truthful and accurate statements to the Commission. The company also acknowledges that false statements and misrepresentations to the Commission are punishable under Title 18 of the U.S. Code and may subject it to enforcement action. Signed _____________________________ [Signature of an officer, as agent of the carrier] Attachments: Accompanying Statement explaining CPNI procedures Explanation of actions taken against data
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-995A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-995A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-995A1.txt
  • the Bureau is sending letters of inquiry to all licensees that air Fox Television Network programming. We take this step to advance the investigation. It should not be construed as a concession that our initial inquiry to Fox was misdirected. 47 U.S.C. § 154(i). 47 U.S.C. § 154(j). 47 U.S.C. § 403. 47 C.F.R. § 73.1015. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.17. See, e.g., SBC Communications Order, 17 FCC Rcd at 7599-7600 ¶¶ 23-28 (ordering $100,000 forfeiture for egregious and intentional failure to certify the response to a Bureau inquiry); Digital Antenna, Inc., Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture and Order, 23 FCC Rcd 7600, 7602 (Spectrum Enforcement Div., Enf. Bur. 2008) (proposing $11,000 forfeiture for failure to provide a complete response
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1111A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1111A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1111A1.txt
  • corresponding with the Commission. Under the Privacy Act of 1974, any statement or information provided by you may be used by the Commission to determine if further enforcement action is required. Any knowingly or willfully false statement, or concealment of any material fact, made in reply to this Citation is punishable by fine or imprisonment. Please also note that section 1.17 of the Rules requires that you provide truthful and accurate statements to the Commission. CONTACT INFORMATION The closest FCC Office is the New York Office in New York. You may contact Dan Noel by telephone, (212) 337-1865, to schedule a personal interview, which must take place within thirty (30) days after the release date of this Citation. You should send
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1128A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1128A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1128A1.txt
  • the Station. Accordingly, we direct Licensee and CPRN, jointly or separately, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), 308(b) and 403 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), to provide responses to the following inquiries, within thirty (30) calendar days from the date of this letter. The Licensee may supplement its responses with additional relevant information pursuant to Sections 1.17 and 1.88 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''). Background. Under the terms of the PSOA, executed on January 12, 2011, the Licensee agreed to make the Station's facilities available to air programming supplied by CPRN ``for up to 24 hours a day, seven days per week'' for the term of the agreement. Additionally, the PSOA provides that: (1) the Station
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1164A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1164A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1164A1.txt
  • with the Commission. Under the Privacy Act of 1974, any statement or information provided by New Generation may be used by the Commission to determine if further enforcement action is required. Any knowingly or willfully false statement, or concealment of any material fact, made in reply to this Citation is punishable by fine or imprisonment. Please also note that section 1.17 of the Rules requires that New Generation provide truthful and accurate statements to the Commission. CONTACT INFORMATION The closest FCC Office is the Detroit Office in Farmington Hills, Michigan. Please contact Celia Lewis by telephone, 202-418-7456, if New Generation wishes to schedule a personal interview. The interview should take place within thirty (30) days after the release date of this
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1165A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1165A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1165A1.txt
  • corresponding with the Commission. Under the Privacy Act of 1974, we also inform Sound Around that the Commission's staff will use all relevant material information before it, including information disclosed in its interview or written statement, to determine if further enforcement action is required to ensure compliance with the Communications Act and the Commission's Rules. Please also note that section 1.17 of the Rules requires that Sound Around provide truthful and accurate statements to the Commission. In addition, the knowing and willful making of any false statement, or the concealment of any material fact, in reply to this Citation is punishable by fine or imprisonment. contact information The closest FCC office is the New York Field Office in New York, New
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-125A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-125A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-125A1.txt
  • corresponding with the Commission. Under the Privacy Act of 1974, any statement or information provided by you may be used by the Commission to determine if further enforcement action is required. Any knowingly or willfully false statement or concealment of any material fact, made in reply to this Citation is punishable by fine or imprisonment. Please also note that section 1.17 of the Rules requires that you provide truthful and accurate statements to the Commission. CONTACT INFORMATION The closest FCC Office is the Los Angeles Field Office, in Cerritos, California. You may contact Samantha Peoples by telephone, 202-418-1101, to schedule a personal interview, which must take place within thirty (30) days after the release date of this Citation. You should send
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-135A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-135A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-135A1.txt
  • corresponding with the Commission. Under the Privacy Act of 1974, any statement or information provided by you may be used by the Commission to determine if further enforcement action is required. Any knowingly or willfully false statement or concealment of any material fact, made in reply to this Citation is punishable by fine or imprisonment. Please also note that section 1.17 of the Rules requires that you provide truthful and accurate statements to the Commission. V. CONTACT INFORMATION The closest FCC office is the New York District Office, in New York, NY. You may contact Jennifer Burton by telephone, 202-418-1160, to schedule a personal interview, which must take place within thirty (30) days after the release date of this Citation. You
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1536A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1536A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1536A1.txt
  • INC. Participant in Auction No. 86 ) ) ) ) ) File No.: EB-11-IH-0734 NAL/Acct. No.: 201232080004 FRN: 0005209374 NOTICE OF APPARENT LIABILITY FOR FORFEITURE Adopted: October 14, 2011 Released: October 14, 2011 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: I. INTRODUCTION In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL''), we find that Vermont Telephone Company, Inc. (``VTel''), apparently violated sections 1.17 and 1.65 of the Commission's rules (``Rules'') by willfully and repeatedly failing to submit accurate revenue information to the Commission and by failing to maintain the continuing accuracy of its application in connection with its participation in Auction No. 86. Based on our review of the facts and circumstances surrounding this matter, and for the reasons discussed below, we find
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-159A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-159A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-159A1.txt
  • the number of complaints, broken down by category or complaint, e.g., instances of improper access by employees, instances of improper disclosure to individuals not authorized to receive the information, or instances of improper access to online information by individuals not authorized to view the information.] The company represents and warrants that the above certification is consistent with 47. C.F.R. § 1.17 which requires truthful and accurate statements to the Commission. The company also acknowledges that false statements and misrepresentations to the Commission are punishable under Title 18 of the U.S. Code and may subject it to enforcement action. Signed _____________________________ [Signature of an officer, as agent of the carrier] Attachments: Accompanying Statement explaining CPNI procedures Explanation of actions taken against data
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1661A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1661A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1661A1.txt
  • the Commission. Under the Privacy Act of 1974, any statement or information provided by an Online Vendor may be used by the Commission to determine if further enforcement action is required. Any knowingly or willfully false statement or concealment of any material fact made in reply to this Citation is punishable by fine or imprisonment. Please also note that section 1.17 of the Rules requires that truthful and accurate statements be provided to the Commission. V. CONTACT INFORMATION For purposes of scheduling a personal interview, the closest FCC office for each Online Vendor is included in Appendix A to this Citation. An Online Vendor may contact the Spectrum Enforcement Division by telephone, 202-418-1160, to schedule an interview, which must take place
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1720A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1720A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1720A1.txt
  • corresponding with the Commission. Under the Privacy Act of 1974, any statement or information provided by you may be used by the Commission to determine if further enforcement action is required. Any knowingly or willfully false statement, or concealment of any material fact, made in reply to this Citation is punishable by fine or imprisonment. Please also note that section 1.17 of the Rules requires that you provide truthful and accurate statements to the Commission. CONTACT INFORMATION The closest FCC Office is the San Juan Office in San Juan, Puerto Rico. Spy Gallery may contact Reuben Jusino by telephone, 787-306-1193, to schedule a personal interview, which must take place within thirty (30) calendar days after the release date of this Citation.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1786A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1786A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1786A1.txt
  • limits in the future. Under the Privacy Act of 1974, any statement or information provided by you may be used by the Commission to determine if further enforcement action is required. Any knowingly or willfully false statement, or concealment of any material fact, made in reply to this Citation is punishable by fine or imprisonment. Please also note that Section 1.17 of the Rules requires that you provide truthful and accurate statements to the Commission. CONTACT INFORMATION The closest FCC Office is the Seattle Field Office in Kirkland, Washington. You may contact this office by telephone, (360)696-6707, to schedule a personal interview, which must take place within twenty (20) days after the release date of this Citation. All written correspondence should
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1787A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1787A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1787A1.txt
  • limits in the future. Under the Privacy Act of 1974, any statement or information provided by you may be used by the Commission to determine if further enforcement action is required. Any knowingly or willfully false statement, or concealment of any material fact, made in reply to this Citation is punishable by fine or imprisonment. Please also note that Section 1.17 of the Rules requires that you provide truthful and accurate statements to the Commission. CONTACT INFORMATION The closest FCC Office is the Seattle Field Office in Kirkland, Washington. You may contact this office by telephone, (360)696-6707, to schedule a personal interview, which must take place within twenty (20) days after the release date of this Citation. All written correspondence should
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-184A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-184A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-184A1.txt
  • Acting Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau: INTRODUCTION In this Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL''), we find Cricket Communications, Inc. (``Cricket''), licensee of common carrier fixed point-to-point microwave stations, call signs WQJE535, Midway, Kentucky, and WQJF544, Frankfort, Kentucky, apparently liable for a forfeiture in the amount of twenty thousand dollars ($20,000) for willful violation of section 1.17(a)(2) of the Commission's rules (``Rules''). The noted violation involves Cricket's provision of incorrect material factual information to the Commission regarding the construction of station WQJE535 without a reasonable basis for believing that the information was correct and accurate. We also admonish Cricket for operating stations WQJE535 and WQJF544 for seven months prior to obtaining Commission authority in violation of section
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1851A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1851A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1851A1.txt
  • failure to be fully informative, accompanied by intent to deceive.'' Intent to deceive is established if a licensee knowingly makes a false statement and can also be inferred when the surrounding circumstances clearly show the existence of intent to deceive. The Commission may disqualify an applicant who deliberately makes misrepresentations or lacks candor in dealing with the agency. Moreover, Section 1.17(a)(2) of the Rules provides that no person may provide, in any written statement of fact, ``material factual information that is incorrect or omit material information that is necessary to prevent any material factual statement that is made from being incorrect or misleading without a reasonable basis for believing that any such material factual statement is correct and not misleading.'' Thus,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-247A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-247A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-247A1.txt
  • 1934, as amended (``Communications Act''), to Share Enterprises Unlimited, Inc. (``Share'') for marketing unauthorized radio frequency devices in the United States in violation of section 302(b) of the Communications Act, and section 2.803 of the Commission's rules (``Rules''), and for providing incorrect, material factual information to the Spectrum Enforcement Division (``Division'') of the Enforcement Bureau (``Bureau'') in violation of section 1.17(a)(2) of the Rules. Share should take immediate steps to come into compliance and to avoid any recurrence of this misconduct. As explained below and as provided in the Communications Act, future violations of the Rules in this regard may subject your company to substantial monetary penalties, seizure of equipment, and criminal sanctions. We also direct Share to supplement its response
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-248A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-248A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-248A1.txt
  • corresponding with the Commission. Under the Privacy Act of 1974, any statement or information provided by you may be used by the Commission to determine if further enforcement action is required. Any knowingly or willfully false statement or concealment of any material fact, made in reply to this Citation is punishable by fine or imprisonment. Please also note that section 1.17 of the Rules requires that you provide truthful and accurate statements to the Commission. Contact Information The closest FCC Office is the Seattle District Office, in Kirkland, Washington. Please call Katherine Power at 202-418-0919 if you wish to schedule a personal interview, which must take place within thirty (30) days after the release of this Citation. You should send any
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-284A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-284A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-284A1.txt
  • $29.05 0.51 207 $22.86 0.80 $28.78 0.83 Wireless MVPD subgroup 2009 31 $54.25 0.92 $33.87 0.48 $29.16 0.52 31 $35.54 1.59 $40.56 1.31 2008 31 $53.21 0.77 $33.08 0.39 $29.11 0.50 31 $34.92 1.50 $39.82 1.24 Low penetration test subgroup 2009 34 $48.74 2.55 $43.23 2.53 $32.44 1.20 33 $16.24 2.59 $19.02 2.95 2008 34 $46.95 2.31 $39.96 2.54 $31.33 1.17 33 $14.67 1.79 $16.46 2.22 Source: 2009 survey. Attachment 14 System Operating Capacity Sample Group Capacity in Megahertz (MHz) Percent of Subscribers by Capacity of System Serving Their Community, January 1, 2009 Jan. 1, 2008 Jan. 1, 2009 750 MHz or Above Above 330 & Below 750 330 MHz or Below Other* n Mean S.E. n Mean S.E. Mean Mean
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-308A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-308A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-308A1.txt
  • this point, we reject without further consideration this unsupported and repetitious argument. 7. Sudbury also argues that the forfeiture amount, for what it refers to as a ``minor mistake'' and ``inadvertent omission,'' is unreasonable and unjust when compared to the decision in Logos Broadcasting Corp., in which the Commission admonished a licensee for making false certifications in violation of Section 1.17 of the Rules. Sudbury, however, neglects to mention the reason for the Commission's seemingly light treatment for what we agree is a serious Rule violation - that issuance of a forfeiture was barred by the statute of limitations. As such, the decision in Logos carries no persuasive weight. 8. Next, Sudbury argues that the forfeiture amount is inconsistent with several
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-314A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-314A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-314A1.txt
  • MB Docket No. 07-260 Dear Licensee: The Media Bureau is investigating allegations concerning the accuracy, completeness, and truthfulness of representations made by Fox Television Stations, Inc. (``Fox'' or the ``Licensee''), licensee of WWOR-TV, Secaucus, New Jersey (the ``Station''), in certain communications with the staff of the Federal Communications Commission (``Commission''). Specifically, the Commission is investigating whether Fox has violated Sections 1.17 or 1.65 of the Commission's rules in connection with these communications or any other communications with the Commission or its staff in the above-referenced proceeding. In letters dated November 27, 2009 and February 15, 2010 and submitted in the docket for this proceeding, Voice for New Jersey (``VNJ'') alleges that, in communications with Commission staff members on August 26, 2009,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-397A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-397A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-397A1.txt
  • request in the Kentucky NAL, it would have dismissed the request as it has dismissed similar requests from other licensees. Therefore, the staff's failure to address the waiver request in the Kentucky NAL is harmless error. Finally, BBN asserts that the disparity between the sanctions issued for the violation at issue here and the sanctions issued for violations of Section 1.17 of the Rules in Logos Broadcasting provide it with grounds for cancellation of the Forfeiture Order. BBN contends that the Commission cannot justify issuing a forfeiture for failure to timely file a license a renewal application when it ``merely admonished a licensee that made false certifications to the Commission.'' However, BBN mischaracterizes the decision. In Logos Broadcasting, the Bureau admonished
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-398A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-398A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-398A1.txt
  • multiple stations. BBN has failed to justify why departure from this precedent is warranted with respect to its violations. The Act requires that violations be either willful or repeated. Here, we find that BBN's violations were willful and repeated. Finally, BBN asserts that the disparity between the sanctions issued for these violations and the sanctions issued for violations of Section 1.17 of the Rules in another decision provide it with grounds for cancellation of the Forfeiture Order. BBN contends that the Commission cannot justify issuing forfeitures for failure to timely file license renewal applications when it ``merely admonished a licensee that made false certifications to the Commission.'' However BBN mischaracterizes the decision. In Logos Broadcasting, the Bureau admonished a licensee for
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-399A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-399A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-399A1.txt
  • failure to address BBN's waiver request in the NAL made no difference in the substantive decision reached by the Bureau; therefore, the staff's failure to address the waiver request in the NAL amounts to harmless error. Finally, BBN asserts that the disparity between the sanctions issued for the violation at issue here and the sanctions issued for violations of Section 1.17 of the Rules in Logos Broadcasting provide it with grounds for cancellation of the Forfeiture Order. BBN contends that the Commission cannot justify issuing a forfeiture for failure to timely file a license renewal application when it ``merely admonished a licensee that made false certifications to the Commission.'' However BBN mischaracterizes the decision. In Logos Broadcasting, the Bureau admonished a
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-408A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-408A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-408A1.txt
  • corresponding with the Commission. Under the Privacy Act of 1974, any statement or information provided by you may be used by the Commission to determine if further enforcement action is required. Any knowingly or willfully false statement, or concealment of any material fact, made in reply to this Citation is punishable by fine or imprisonment. Please also note that section 1.17 of the rules requires that you provide truthful and accurate statements to the Commission. CONTACT INFORMATION The closest FCC Office is the Los Angeles Office in Cerritos, California. You may contact the Los Angeles Office by telephone, (562) 860-7474, to schedule a personal interview, which must take place within thirty (30) days after the release date of this Citation. or
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-447A3.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-447A3.txt
  • (WRC-07) Compatibility between the aeronautical mobile (R) service and the fixed-satellite service (Earth- to-space) in the band 5 091 ­ 5 150 MHz NOC Referred to in Res. 418 and Res. 419. Res. 748 in turn refers to Res. 114. RES 749 (WRC-07) Studies on the use of the band 790-862 MHz by mobile applications and by other services NOC 1.17 RES 750 (WRC-07) Compatibility between the Earth exploration-satellite service (passive) and relevant active services NOC ATTACHMENT 22 RESOLUTION FCC NTIA Comments WRC-12 Agenda Item RES 751 (WRC-07) Use of the frequency band 10.6-10.68 GHz NOC ANNEX Sharing criteria in the band 10.6-10.68 GHz NOC RES 752 (WRC-07) Use of the frequency band 36-37 GHz NOC ANNEX Sharing criteria in the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-447A3_Rcd.pdf
  • 091 ­ 5 150 M Hz NOC Referre d to in Res. 418 a nd R es. 419. Res. 748 i n tur n re fers to Res. 114. RES 749 (WRC-07 ) St udies on the use of th e ba nd 79 0-8 62 MHz by m obil e applica tions and by othe r se rvices NOC 1.17 RES 750 (WRC-07) Com patibilit y between t he Eart h expl oration-satellite service (passiv e) and relevant active services NOC 3612 ATTACH MENT RESOL UTIO N FCC NTIA Com ments WRC-12Age nda Item RES 751 (WRC-07 ) Use of th e frequen cy b and 10.6-10 .68 GHz NOC ANNE X Sha ring criteria in the band 10.6-10.68 GHz
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-47A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-47A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-47A1.txt
  • limits in the future. Under the Privacy Act of 1974, any statement or information provided by you may be used by the Commission to determine if further enforcement action is required. Any knowingly or willfully false statement, or concealment of any material fact, made in reply to this Citation is punishable by fine or imprisonment. Please also note that Section 1.17 of the Rules requires that you provide truthful and accurate statements to the Commission. CONTACT INFORMATION The closest FCC Office is the Seattle Field Office in Kirkland, Washington. You may contact this office by telephone, (360)696-6707, to schedule a personal interview, which must take place within twenty (20) days after the release date of this Citation. All written correspondence should
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-500A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-500A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-500A1.txt
  • for further information about the nondiscrimination certification requirement. Issued by: Chief, Enforcement Bureau -FCC- . See Promoting Diversification of Ownership in the Broadcasting Services, Report and Order and Third Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, 23 FCC Rcd 5922, 5940 ¶ 40 (2008). See id. at 5941 ¶ 49. See id. . See 47 U.S.C. § 309(k). See 47 C.F.R. § 1.17. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.65 (applicants have a continuing obligation to advise the FCC, through amendments, of any substantial and material changes in the information furnished in this application). PUBLIC NOTICE of 2 PUBLIC NOTICE FCC ENFORCEMENT ADVISORY Federal Communications Commission 445 12th St., S.W. Washington, D.C. 20554 News Media Information 202 / 418-0500 Internet: http://www.fcc.gov TTY: 1-888-835-5322 News Media
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-528A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-528A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-528A1.txt
  • corresponding with the Commission. Under the Privacy Act of 1974, any statement or information provided by you may be used by the Commission to determine if further enforcement action is required. Any knowingly or willfully false statement, or concealment of any material fact, made in reply to this Citation is punishable by fine or imprisonment. Please also note that section 1.17 of the Rules requires that you provide truthful and accurate statements to the Commission. CONTACT INFORMATION The closest FCC Office is the Philadelphia Office in Langhorne, Pennsylvania. You may contact Gene Stanbro by telephone, (215) 741-3016, to schedule a personal interview, which must take place within thirty (30) days after the release date of this Citation. You should send any
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-550A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-550A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-550A1.txt
  • corresponding with the Commission. Under the Privacy Act of 1974, any statement or information provided by you may be used by the Commission to determine if further enforcement action is required. Any knowingly or willfully false statement, or concealment of any material fact, made in reply to this Citation is punishable by fine or imprisonment. Please also note that section 1.17 of the Rules requires that you provide truthful and accurate statements to the Commission. CONTACT INFORMATION The closest FCC Office is the Atlanta Field Office in Duluth, GA. You may contact this office by telephone, (770)935-3370, to schedule a personal interview, which must take place within twenty (20) days after the release date of this Citation. or call the Consumer
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-570A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-570A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-570A1.txt
  • have submitted TRPs where basket indices and service bands have been aggregated even though some study area tariffs have been kept separated. Fields that require data entry are colored black; calculated fields are colored blue. Annual 1987 Access Tariff Filings, Petitions for Waivers of Filing Requirements, Mimeo No. 6945 (rel. Sept. 16, 1986) (1987 Waiver Order). See 47 C.F.R. § 1.17 (establishing requirement for truthful and accurate statements in Commission matters, including ``any tariff proceeding''). 44 U.S.C. §§ 3506 et seq. OMB Control No. 3060-0400. (...continued from previous page) (continued....) Federal Communications Commission DA 11-570 Federal Communications Commission DA 11-570 ) * Ù Ú ' � � F 0 0 è è è è
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-5A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-5A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-5A1.txt
  • corresponding with the Commission. Under the Privacy Act of 1974, any statement or information provided by you may be used by the Commission to determine if further enforcement action is required. Any knowingly or willfully false statement, or concealment of any material fact, made in reply to this Citation is punishable by fine or imprisonment. Please also note that Section 1.17 of the Rules requires that you provide truthful and accurate statements to the Commission. CONTACT INFORMATION The closest FCC Office is the Detroit Office in Farmington Hills, Michigan. You may contact James Bridgewater by telephone, (248) 471-5661, to schedule a personal interview, which must take place within thirty (30) days after the release date of this Citation. You should send
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-623A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-623A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-623A1.txt
  • 2011) (Reply). Petition at iii. 47 C.F.R. § 101.103(d). See Petition at 6-7. Response at 1. Id. Id. At the time Micronet submitted the Health Departments applications, Comsearch had already put Micronet on notice that the Port Authority considered its license to be active. See Petition, Exhibit 2 (Letter, David L. Wiggens to Brad Youngblood (Nov. 29, 2010)). . Section 1.17(a)(2) of the Commission's rules states that no person may provide, in any written statement of fact, ``material factual information that is incorrect or omit material information that is necessary to prevent any material factual statement that is made from being incorrect or misleading without a reasonable basis for believing that any such material factual statement is correct and not misleading.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-691A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-691A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-691A1.txt
  • reject without further consideration this unsupported and repetitious argument. 7. Phoenix also argues that the forfeiture amount, for what it refers to in each case as a ``minor mistake'' and ``inadvertent omission,'' is unreasonable and unjust when compared to the decision in Logos Broadcasting Corp., in which the Commission admonished a licensee for making false certifications in violation of Section 1.17 of the Rules. Phoenix, however, neglects to mention the reason for the Commission's seemingly light treatment for what we agree is a serious Rule violation - that issuance of a forfeiture was barred by the statute of limitations. As such, the decision in Logos carries no persuasive weight. 8. Next, Phoenix again argues that the forfeiture amounts are inconsistent with
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-692A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-692A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-692A1.txt
  • this point, we reject without further consideration this unsupported and repetitious argument. 8. Saga also argues that the forfeiture amount, for what it refers to as a ``minor mistake'' and ``inadvertent omission,'' is unreasonable and unjust when compared to the decision in Logos Broadcasting Corp., in which the Commission admonished a licensee for making false certifications in violation of Section 1.17 of the Rules. Saga, however, neglects to mention the reason for the Commission's seemingly light treatment for what we agree is a serious Rule violation - that issuance of a forfeiture was barred by the statute of limitations. As such, the decision in Logos carries no persuasive weight. 9. Lastly, Saga reiterates arguments made in its Request that the imposition
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-693A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-693A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-693A1.txt
  • this point, we reject without further consideration this unsupported and repetitious argument. 8. Saga also argues that the forfeiture amount, for what it refers to as a ``minor mistake'' and ``inadvertent omission,'' is unreasonable and unjust when compared to the decision in Logos Broadcasting Corp., in which the Commission admonished a licensee for making false certifications in violation of Section 1.17 of the Rules. Saga, however, neglects to mention the reason for the Commission's seemingly light treatment for what we agree is a serious Rule violation - that issuance of a forfeiture was barred by the statute of limitations. As such, the decision in Logos carries no persuasive weight. 9. Lastly, Saga reiterates arguments made in its Request that the imposition
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-704A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-704A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-704A1.txt
  • corresponding with the Commission. Under the Privacy Act of 1974, any statement or information provided by you may be used by the Commission to determine if further enforcement action is required. Any knowingly or willfully false statement, or concealment of any material fact, made in reply to this Citation is punishable by fine or imprisonment. Please also note that section 1.17 of the Rules requires that you provide truthful and accurate statements to the Commission. CONTACT INFORMATION The closest FCC Office is the Philadelphia Office in Langhorne, Pennsylvania. You may contact Gene Stanbro by telephone, (215) 741-3016, to schedule a personal interview, which must take place within thirty (30) days after the release date of this Citation. You should send any
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-732A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-732A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-732A1.txt
  • larger than the size of Texas. It has a high central plateau with narrow coastal plains and several mountain ranges. Fixed Total Fiber Cable DSL Other Fixed broadband subs per 100 inhabitants 9.4 0.1 0.3 9.0 0.0 Fixed broadband subs (June 2010) 6,790,103 % of households with fixed broadband access (2007) 16.5 Mobile Mobile wireless broadband subs per 100 inhabitants 1.17 Mobile wireless broadband subs (June 2010) 841,945 40. United Kingdom Regulation: Ofcom was established as a corporate body by the Office of Communications Act 2002. Ofcom is the regulator for the UK communications industries, with responsibilities across television, radio, telecommunications and wireless communications services. Ofcom manages spectrum and ensures that a ``wide range of electronic communications services - including high
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-732A1_Rcd.pdf
  • larger than the size of Texas. It has a high central plateau with narrow coastal plains and several mountain ranges. Fixed Total Fiber Cable DSL Other Fixed broadband subs per 100 inhabitants454 9.4 0.1 0.3 9.0 0.0 Fixed broadband subs (June 2010)455 6,790,103 % of households with fixed broadband access (2007)456 16.5 Mobile Mobile wireless broadband subs per 100 inhabitants457 1.17 Mobile wireless broadband subs (June 2010)458 841,945 454OECD Broadband Portal, Table 1d (3) (June 2010) (accessed Feb. 11, 2011). 455Id. 456OECD Broadband Portal, Table 2a (July 2010) (accessed Feb. 11, 2011). 457OECD Broadband Portal, Table 1d (2) (June 2010) (accessed Feb. 11, 2011). 458Id. 7493 Federal Communications Commission DA 11-732 40. United Kingdom Regulation: Ofcom was established as a corporate
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-812A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-812A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-812A1.txt
  • corresponding with the Commission. Under the Privacy Act of 1974, any statement or information provided by you may be used by the Commission to determine if further enforcement action is required. Any knowingly or willfully false statement, or concealment of any material fact, made in reply to this Citation is punishable by fine or imprisonment. Please also note that section 1.17 of the Rules requires that you provide truthful and accurate statements to the Commission. CONTACT INFORMATION The closest FCC office is the New York District Office in New York, NY. You may contact Karen Mercer by telephone, (202) 418-1160, to schedule a personal interview, which must take place within thirty (30) calendar days after the release date of this Citation.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-924A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-924A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-924A1.txt
  • corresponding with the Commission. Under the Privacy Act of 1974, any statement or information provided by you may be used by the Commission to determine if further enforcement action is required. Any knowingly or willfully false statement, or concealment of any material fact, made in reply to this Citation is punishable by fine or imprisonment. Please also note that section 1.17 of the Rules requires that you provide truthful and accurate statements to the Commission. CONTACT INFORMATION The closest FCC Office is the Atlanta District Office in Atlanta, Georgia. Pyong Kon Eun may contact Salomon Satche by telephone, 301-725-1996, to schedule a personal interview, which must take place within Thirty (30) calendar days after the release date of this Citation. You
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-984A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-984A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-984A1.txt
  • corresponding with the Commission. Under the Privacy Act of 1974, any statement or information provided by you may be used by the Commission to determine if further enforcement action is required. Any knowingly or willfully false statement, or concealment of any material fact, made in reply to this Citation is punishable by fine or imprisonment. Please also note that section 1.17 of the Rules requires that you provide truthful and accurate statements to the Commission. CONTACT INFORMATION The closest FCC office is the Chicago District Office in Park Ridge, Illinois. You may contact James M. Roop by telephone, 847-813-4660, to schedule a personal interview, which must take place within thirty (30) days after the release date of this Citation. You should
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-98A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-98A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-98A1.txt
  • corresponding with the Commission. Under the Privacy Act of 1974, any statement or information provided by you may be used by the Commission to determine if further enforcement action is required. Any knowingly or willfully false statement, or concealment of any material fact, made in reply to this Citation is punishable by fine or imprisonment. Please also note that Section 1.17 of the Rules requires that you provide truthful and accurate statements to the Commission. CONTACT INFORMATION The closest FCC Office is the Seattle Field Office in Kirkland, Washington. You may contact Salomon Satche by telephone, (301) 725-1996, to schedule a personal interview, which must take place within thirty (30) days after the release date of this Citation. You should send
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-121A2_Rcd.pdf
  • 0.32 1,533.47 28.48 CA 21,025 414 246 52 30 45,234 32,742 30.33 1,323.64 31,340.15 3,329.01 6.59 26.20 0.98 981.29 4.93 CO 11,313 218 151 58 14 17,398 20,072 0.00 892.85 16,336.71 1,581.69 0.00 135.68 1.93 837.63 83.70 CT 206 25 16 4 4 1,298 19 0.00 15.39 62.37 10.77 0.00 0.00 0.00 6.98 0.00 DE 22211 52 1 0.00 0.00 1.17 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.07 0.00 FL 2,177 98 75 41 24 9,952 2,194 15.43 146.31 2,234.18 222.39 1.96 11.51 0.00 52.36 6.37 GA 5,270 384 261 118 21 40,894 3,295 1.67 453.39 5,506.28 130.86 0.08 28.08 0.10 346.41 8.00 HI 444 29 24 5 4 3,379 1,362 0.00 55.63 370.31 339.73 0.00 0.21 0.14 38.94 2.52 IA 697 65
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-170A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-170A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-170A1.txt
  • the number of complaints, broken down by category or complaint, e.g., instances of improper access by employees, instances of improper disclosure to individuals not authorized to receive the information, or instances of improper access to online information by individuals not authorized to view the information.] The company represents and warrants that the above certification is consistent with 47. C.F.R. § 1.17 which requires truthful and accurate statements to the Commission. The company also acknowledges that false statements and misrepresentations to the Commission are punishable under Title 18 of the U.S. Code and may subject it to enforcement action. Signed _____________________________ [Signature of an officer, as agent of the carrier] Attachments: Accompanying Statement explaining CPNI procedures Explanation of actions taken against data
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-185A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-185A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-185A1.txt
  • Wisconsin, by a succession of serial minor change applications. We direct the Licensee, pursuant to Sections 4(i), 4(j), 308(b) and 403 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, to provide responses to the following inquiries, within thirty (30) calendar days from the date of this letter. The Licensee may supplement its responses with additional relevant information pursuant to Sections 1.17 and 1.88 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''). Instructions If the Licensee requests that any information or Documents, as defined herein, responsive to this letter be treated in a confidential manner, the Licensee shall submit, along with all responsive information and Documents, a statement in accordance with Section 0.459 of the Rules. Requests for confidential treatment must comply with the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-185A1_Rcd.pdf
  • Allis, Wisconsin, by a succession of serial minor change applications. We direct the Licensee, pursuant to Sections 4(i), 4(j), 308(b) and 403 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended,1to provide responses to the following inquiries, within thirty (30) calendar days from the date of this letter. The Licensee may supplement its responses with additional relevant information pursuant to Sections 1.17 and 1.88 of the Commission's Rules (the "Rules").2 147 U.S.C. §§ 154(i), 154(j), 308(b), and 403. 247 C.F.R. §§ 1.17, 1.88. 1465 Radio Power, Inc. February10, 2012 Instructions If the Licensee requests that any information or Documents, as defined herein, responsive to this letter be treated in a confidential manner, the Licensee shall submit, along with all responsive information and
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-187A2_Rcd.pdf
  • 0.32 1,584.27 29.37 CA 19,650 407 249 51 30 34,947 32,135 36.68 1,265.05 29,222.59 3,371.59 8.51 24.00 1.16 934.09 5.39 CO 11,271 219 150 58 14 16,938 20,200 0.00 923.89 16,502.92 1,564.00 0.00 142.42 1.86 838.56 83.22 CT 81 15 9 3 3 624 9 0.00 6.90 25.03 1.96 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.35 0.00 DE 22211 52 1 0.00 0.00 1.17 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 FL 1,665 87 69 36 21 7,749 1,920 15.43 126.32 1,749.27 228.00 1.96 9.73 0.00 33.71 6.03 GA 5,280 375 261 118 21 40,474 3,353 1.48 460.75 5,620.21 131.86 0.00 36.62 0.10 352.40 7.20 HI 412 32 27 5 4 3,147 1,327 0.00 55.06 330.52 342.09 0.00 0.21 0.14 36.58 2.16 IA 591 66
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-575A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-575A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-575A1.txt
  • Verizon and Embarq LTC, which have submitted TRPs where basket indices and service bands have been aggregated even though some study area tariffs have been kept separated. 47 C.F.R. § 51.909(b)-(g). Id. §§ 51.705, 51.917(d). Annual 1987 Access Tariff Filings, Petitions for Waivers of Filing Requirements, Mimeo No. 6945 (rel. Sept. 16, 1986) (1987 Waiver Order). See 47 C.F.R. § 1.17 (establishing requirement for truthful and accurate statements in Commission matters, including ``any tariff proceeding''). (...continued from previous page) (continued....) Federal Communications Commission DA 12-575 Federal Communications Commission DA 12-575 Ã Ä � � � ^ ¸ Œ " à 0 0 e n
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-64A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-64A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-64A1.txt
  • Media Designer, Clear Channel Los Angeles. See LOI Response at Exhibit K and Further LOI Response at Exhibit 2. See LOI Response at 4 and Application of WorldCom, Inc. and MCI Communications Corporation for Transfer of Control of MCI Communications Corporation to Worldcom, Inc., Memorandum Opinion and Order, 13 FCC Rcd 18025, 18134 ¶ 193 (1998) (citing 47 C.F.R. § 1.17 for proposition that, in light of their duty to be truthful and accurate in their representations to the Commission, statements provided by Commission licensees in response to investigatory or adjudicatory matters within the Commission's jurisdiction are awarded substantial weight in the absence of persuasive evidence to the contrary). See The Commission's Forfeiture Policy Statement and Amendment of Section 1.80 of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-679A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-679A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-679A1.txt
  • corresponding with the Commission. Under the Privacy Act of 1974, any statement or information provided by you may be used by the Commission to determine if further enforcement action is required. Any knowingly or willfully false statement, or concealment of any material fact, made in reply to this Citation is punishable by fine or imprisonment. Please also note that Section 1.17 of the Rules requires that you provide truthful and accurate statements to the Commission. V. CONTACT INFORMATION The closest FCC Office is the Atlanta Office in Atlanta, Georgia. North Chapel may contact Douglas Miller by telephone, (770) 935-3370, to schedule a personal interview, which must take place within thirty (30) calendar days after the release date of this Citation. You
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-725A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-725A1.txt
  • of San Francisco ("USF"), and Classical Public Radio Network LLC ("CPRN"). The Consent Decree resolves issues arising from the Bureau's review of the captioned application for consent to the proposed assignment of license for Station KUSF(FM), San Francisco, CA (the "Station") from USF to CPRN. In particular, the Consent Decree resolves the Bureau's investigation of the applicants' compliance with Sections 1.17 and73.503(c)of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. § § 1.17,73.503(c)(the "Rules").1 2. The Consent Decree stipulates that both USF and CPRN violated Section 1.17 of the Rules and that USF violated Section73.503(c)of the Rules, and provides, among other things, that USF and CPRN will collectively make a $50,000 voluntary contribution to the United States Treasury. A copy of the Consent Decree
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-816A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-816A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-816A1.txt
  • 5 FCC Rcd 3252 (1990) (``1990 Character Policy Statement''), Memorandum Opinion and Order, 6 FCC Rcd 3448 (1991), Memorandum Opinion and Order, 7 FCC Rcd 6564 (1992). The Commission applies its broadcast character standards to applicants and licensees in the other radio services. See, e.g., 1990 Character Policy Statement, 5 FCC Rcd at 3253 ¶ 10 (adopting 47 C.F.R. § 1.17 to apply prohibition against misrepresentations and material omissions to applicants, licensees, and permittees in all radio services). See, e.g., Applications of Atlantic Tele-Network, Inc. and Cellco Partnership d/b/a Verizon Wireless For Consent to Assign or Transfer Control of Licenses and Authorizations, WT Docket No. 09-119, Memorandum Opinion and Order, 25 FCC Rcd 3763, 3776 ¶ 25 (WTB & IB 2010)
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-931A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-931A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-931A1.txt
  • Released: June 14, 2012 By the Resident Agent, Houston Office, South Central Region, Enforcement Bureau: INTRODUCTION In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (NAL), we find Vision Latina Broadcasting, Inc. (Vision Latina Broadcasting), licensee of Station KBPO, Port Neches, Texas, apparently liable for a forfeiture in the amount of twenty five thousand dollars ($25,000) for willful violation of Section 1.17(a)(2) of the Commission's rules (Rules). The noted violation involves Vision Latina Broadcasting's provision of incorrect factual information of a material nature to the Commission regarding Station KBPO's public inspection file without a reasonable basis for believing that the information was correct and accurate. BACKGROUND On December 9, 2010, during regular business hours, an agent from the Enforcement Bureau's Houston Office
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-215526A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-215526A1.txt
  • Federal State or Jurisdiction Federal State Federal Federal and State Support Support Match Support Support Alabama $6.10 $3.50 $1.75 $7.85 $11.35 Alaska 6.10 3.50 1.75 7.85 11.35 American Samoa 6.10 0.00 0.00 6.10 6.10 Arizona 6.10 3.50 1.14 7.24 10.74 Arkansas 6.10 0.00 0.00 6.10 6.10 California 6.10 3.50 1.75 7.85 11.35 Colorado 6.10 3.50 1.75 7.85 11.35 Connecticut 6.10 1.17 0.58 6.68 7.85 Delaware 6.10 0.00 0.00 6.10 6.10 District of Columbia 6.10 3.50 1.75 7.85 11.35 Florida 6.10 3.50 1.75 7.85 11.35 Georgia 6.10 3.50 1.75 7.85 11.35 Guam 6.10 3.50 1.75 7.85 11.35 Hawaii 6.10 0.00 0.00 6.10 6.10 Idaho 6.10 3.50 1.75 7.85 11.35 Illinois 6.10 1.50 0.75 6.85 8.35 Indiana 6.10 0.00 0.00 6.10 6.10 Iowa
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-216913A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-216913A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-216913A1.txt
  • the Commission. The Commission also found that SBC's loop qualification system, as it operated when the Commission approved the Kansas/Oklahoma application, did not violate section 271 of the Communications Act. Based on its investigation, however, the Commission did find that SBC appears to be liable for other apparent violations. Specifically, the Commission found that: SBC appears to have violated section 1.17 of the Commission's Rules by intentionally misrepresenting information to the Enforcement Bureau during the investigation. The Commission proposed a fine of $120,000 for this apparent violation. (over SBC appears to have violated section 1.65 of the Commission's Rules when it failed to notify the Commission in a timely manner that the information in the affidavits was inaccurate. For this, the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-220426A1.doc
  • its rules to implement domestically various allocation decisions from International Telecommunication Union (ITU) World Radio Communication Conferences concerning the frequency bands below 28000 kilohertz ("kHz"). Comments due 30 days from publication in the Federal Register; replies due 60 days from publication in the Federal Register. OFFICE OF GENERAL COUNSEL GC 02-37; NPRM 02/22/02 (adopted 02/14/02); FCC 02-54 Amendment of Section 1.17 of the Commission's Rules Concerning Truthful Statements to the Commission. The Commission seeks comment on whether certain classes of proceedings should be subject to the rule only when deceptive intent is involved and whether persons or entities that are not regulated by the Commission should be subject to the rule only when deceptive intent is involved. Comments due 30 days
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-220638A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-220638A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-220638A1.txt
  • its rules to implement domestically various allocation decisions from International Telecommunication Union (ITU) World Radio Communication Conferences concerning the frequency bands below 28000 kilohertz ("kHz"). Comments due 30 days from publication in the Federal Register; replies due 60 days from publication in the Federal Register. OFFICE OF GENERAL COUNSEL GC 02-37; NPRM 02/22/02 (adopted 02/14/02); FCC 02-54 Amendment of Section 1.17 of the Commission's Rules Concerning Truthful Statements to the Commission. The Commission seeks comment on whether certain classes of proceedings should be subject to the rule only when deceptive intent is involved and whether persons or entities that are not regulated by the Commission should be subject to the rule only when deceptive intent is involved. Comments due 30 days
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-220889A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-220889A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-220889A1.txt
  • its rules to implement domestically various allocation decisions from International Telecommunication Union (ITU) World Radio Communication Conferences concerning the frequency bands below 28000 kilohertz ("kHz"). Comments due 30 days from publication in the Federal Register; replies due 60 days from publication in the Federal Register. OFFICE OF GENERAL COUNSEL GC 02-37; NPRM 02/22/02 (adopted 02/14/02); FCC 02-54 Amendment of Section 1.17 of the Commission's Rules Concerning Truthful Statements to the Commission. The Commission seeks comment on whether certain classes of proceedings should be subject to the rule only when deceptive intent is involved and whether persons or entities that are not regulated by the Commission should be subject to the rule only when deceptive intent is involved. Comments due 30 days
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-221523A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-221523A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-221523A1.txt
  • Regarding Petition to Intervene. In the Matter of Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service Petition of Smith Bagley, Inc. for Definition of Service Area within the study area of Century Tel of the Southwest, Inc. in the State of New Mexico (CC Docket No. 96-45). Comments - The New Mexico Exchange Carrier Group, In the Matter of Amendment of Section 1.17 of the Commission's Rules Concerning Truthful Statements to the Commission (GC Docket No. 02-37). Request an Extension of Time to File Comments - FCBA. In the Matter of Revision of the Commission's Rules to Ensure Compatibility with Enhanced 911 Emergency Calling Systems/Wireless E911 Phase II Implementation Plan of Nextel Communications, Inc. (CC Docket No. 94-102). Nextel Partners, Inc. Phase II
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-231908A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-231908A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-231908A1.txt
  • Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE News Media contact: March 10, 2003 Audrey Spivack 202-418-0512 FCC STRENGTHENS RULES CONCERING TRUTHFUL WRITTEN STATEMENTS SUBMITTED TO THE COMMISSION Washington, D.C. - Today, the FCC announced that it has revised its rules to strengthen the requirements for the submission of truthful statements to the Commission. As amended, section 1.17 of the Commission's Rules prohibits written and oral statements of fact that are intentionally incorrect or misleading and written statements of fact that are made without a reasonable basis for believing that the statement is correct and not misleading. In requiring that submitters of written statements in fact-based adjudications and investigations have a reasonable basis to believe that what they
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-234048A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-234048A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-234048A1.txt
  • Regarding DIRECTV's DBS (MB Docket No. 03-82)/Service to the States of Alaska and Hawaii (IB Docket No. 98-21). Opposition - DIRECTV, Inc. April 25 In re: Pine Belt Cellular, Inc. & Pine Belt PCS, Inc. Update of First Quarter 2003 TTY Status Report - CC Docket No. 94-102. John Kuykendall, Esq. April 28 In the Matter of Amendment of Section 1.17 of the Commission's Rules Concerning Truthful Statements to the Commission/Amendment of the Commission's Rules Regulations to Adopt Protection of the Due Process Rights and Other Protections of Title III Licensees in Connection With the Exercise by the Commission and its Staff of the Commission's Enforcement Powers and Certain Licensing and Regulatory Functions (GC Docket No. 02-37). Petition for Reconsideration -
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-234231A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-234231A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-234231A1.txt
  • BROADCASTING OF JOPLIN, L.L.C. Requested Facility: Ch No:46 N Latitude: 37-4-33; W Longitude: 94-33-16 ERP (Average): 1.65 kW; HAAT: 191.3 meters; Antenna: ND Facility ID: 65370 Call Sign: KFDX-DT File No: BDSTA-20030121ADS City: WICHITA FALLS State: TX Grant Date: 02/13/2003 Licensee Name: NEXSTAR BROADCASTING OF WICHITA FALLS, L.L.C. Requested Facility: Ch No:28 N Latitude: 33-53-23; W Longitude: 98-33-30 ERP (Average): 1.17 kW; HAAT: 277.6 meters; Antenna: ND Facility ID: 37101 Call Sign: KWHD-DT File No: BDSTA-20030122AEZ City: CASTLE ROCK State: CO Grant Date: 02/27/2003 Licensee Name: LESEA BROADCASTING CORPORATION Requested Facility: Ch No:46 N Latitude: 39-25-57; W Longitude: 104-39-18 ERP (Average): 7 kW; HAAT: 179 meters; Antenna: ND Facility ID: 59494 Call Sign: KCSG-DT File No: BDSTA-20030123ACU City: CEDAR CITY State:
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-235636A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-235636A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-235636A1.txt
  • Reconsideration - The Curators of the University of Missouri. In re Applications of General Motors Corporation and Hughes Electronics Corporation and The News Corporation Limited For Authority to Transfer Control (MB Docket No. 03-124). Petition to Deny - National Hispanic Media Coalition; Comments - Advance/Newhouse Communications, Cable One, Cox Communications and Insight Communications. In the Matter of Amendment of Section 1.17 of the Commission's Rules Concerning Truthful Statements to the Commission/Amendment of the Commission's Rules Pursuant to a Petition for Rulemaking Filed by James A. Kay, Jr. (GC Docket No. 02-37). Opposition to Petition for Reconsideration - Mobile Relay Associates. -2- In the Matter of Telephone Number Portability Repeal of Section 52.31 of the Commission's Rules Regarding Commercial Mobile Radio Service
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-243416A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-243416A1.txt
  • 25.84 25.84 C/I Other DBS 30 cm dB 20.7 20 25.84 25.84 Feeder Link C/(N+I) dB 24.2 26.2 24.2 26.2 Overall C/(N+I) 45 cm Margin 45 cm 45 cm Overall C/(N+I) 30 cm Margin 30 cm 30 cm dB 12.36 12.35 12.82 12.94 dB 7.36 6.25 7.82 6.84 dB 7.1 1 7.1 1 dB 2.1 1 1.01 7.24 2.24 7.27 1.17 4 n . & CERTIFICATION OF PERSON RESPONSIBLE FOR PREPARING ENGINEERING INFORMATION SUBMITTED WITH THESE COMMENTS I hereby certify that I am the technically qualified person responsible for preparation of the engineering information submitted with these Comments, that I am familiar with Part 25 of the Commission's Rules, that I have either prepared or reviewed the engineering information submitted with
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-247983A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-247983A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-247983A1.txt
  • to these petitions must be filed within 15 days of the date of public notice of the petitions in the Federal Register. See Section 1.4(b)(1) of the Commission's rules (47 CFR 1.4(b)(1)). Replies to an opposition must be filed within 10 days after the time for filing oppositions has expired. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ ------------------------------------------------------- Subject: In the Matter of Amendment of Section 1.17 of the Commission's Rules Concerning Truthful Statements to the Commission (GC Docket No. 02-37) Amendment of the Commission's Rules Regulations to Adopt Protection of the Due Process Rights and Other Protections of Title III Licensees in Connection With the Exercise by the Commission and its Staff of the Commission's Enforcement Powers and Certain Licensing and Regulatory Functions Filed By: -Robert
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-249262A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-249262A1.txt
  • 1.60 1.61 1966 32.3 100.1 47.6 52.5 18.9 30.1 3.10 1.47 1.63 1.59 1.61 1967 39.7 114.2 54.6 59.6 23.4 31.8 2.88 1.38 1.50 1.36 1.45 1968 46.4 126.9 61.5 65.4 28.2 40.0 2.73 1.33 1.41 1.42 1.41 1969 64.6 172.0 82.7 89.4 38.3 51.6 2.66 1.28 1.38 1.35 1.37 1970 81.1 196.6 98.9 97.7 51.0 59.8 2.43 1.22 1.21 1.17 1.19 1971 100.9 237.4 120.7 116.6 68.4 75.1 2.35 1.20 1.16 1.10 1.13 1972 126.5 291.8 148.2 143.6 91.7 98.6 2.31 1.17 1.14 1.08 1.11 1973 159.3 364.9 184.4 180.5 111.5 120.2 2.29 1.16 1.13 1.08 1.11 1974 190.7 428.7 216.6 212.1 142.0 152.2 2.25 1.14 1.11 1.07 1.09 1975 219.4 490.2 247.4 242.9 167.0 176.9 2.23 1.13 1.11 1.06
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-253702A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-253702A1.pdf
  • should be revoked, or to any other matter within the jurisdiction of the Commission, or, in the case of a proceeding to amend the FM or Television Table of Allotments, require from any person filing an expression of interest, written statements of fact relevant to that allotment proceeding. Any such statements of fact are subject to the provisions of § 1.17 of this chapter. Paulino Bernal failed to provide a written response to the Letter of Inquiry as required pursuant to this section. 47 U.S.C. § 308(b): ``The Commission, at any time after the filing of such original application and during the term of any such licenses, may require from an applicant or licensee further written statements of fact to enable
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-255044A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-255044A1.pdf
  • should be revoked, or to any other matter within the jurisdiction of the Commission, or, in the case of a proceeding to amend the FM or Television Table of Allotments, require from any person filing an expression of interest, written statements of fact relevant to that allotment proceeding. Any such statements of fact are subject to the provisions of § 1.17 of this chapter. Paulino Bernal Evangelism failed to provide a written response to the Letter of Inquiry as required pursuant to this section. 47 U.S.C. § 308(b): ``The Commission, at any time after the filing of such original application and during the term of any such licenses, may require from an applicant or licensee further written statements of fact to
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-255045A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-255045A1.pdf
  • should be revoked, or to any other matter within the jurisdiction of the Commission, or, in the case of a proceeding to amend the FM or Television Table of Allotments, require from any person filing an expression of interest, written statements of fact relevant to that allotment proceeding. Any such statements of fact are subject to the provisions of § 1.17 of this chapter.'' La Radio Cristiana Network, Inc. failed to provide a written response to the Letter of Inquiry as required pursuant to this section. 47 U.S.C. § 308(b): ``. . . The Commission, at any time after the filing of such original application and during the term of any such licenses, may require from an applicant or licensee further
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-255046A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-255046A1.pdf
  • should be revoked, or to any other matter within the jurisdiction of the Commission, or, in the case of a proceeding to amend the FM or Television Table of Allotments, require from any person filing an expression of interest, written statements of fact relevant to that allotment proceeding. Any such statements of fact are subject to the provisions of § 1.17 of this chapter.'' Paulino Bernal Evangelism failed to provide a written response to the Letter of Inquiry as required pursuant to this section. 47 U.S.C. § 308(b): ``. . . The Commission, at any time after the filing of such original application and during the term of any such licenses, may require from an applicant or licensee further written statements
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-255047A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-255047A1.pdf
  • should be revoked, or to any other matter within the jurisdiction of the Commission, or, in the case of a proceeding to amend the FM or Television Table of Allotments, require from any person filing an expression of interest, written statements of fact relevant to that allotment proceeding. Any such statements of fact are subject to the provisions of § 1.17 of this chapter.'' Unique Broadcasting, L.L.C. failed to provide a written response to the Letter of Inquiry as required pursuant to this section. 47 U.S.C. § 308(b): ``. . . The Commission, at any time after the filing of such original application and during the term of any such licenses, may require from an applicant or licensee further written statements
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-255240A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-255240A1.pdf
  • should be revoked, or to any other matter within the jurisdiction of the Commission, or, in the case of a proceeding to amend the FM or Television Table of Allotments, require from any person filing an expression of interest, written statements of fact relevant to that allotment proceeding. Any such statements of fact are subject to the provisions of § 1.17 of this chapter.'' Paulino Bernal failed to provide a written response to the Letter of Inquiry as required pursuant to this section. 47 U.S.C. § 308(b): ``. . . The Commission, at any time after the filing of such original application and during the term of any such licenses, may require from an applicant or licensee further written statements of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-260415A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-260415A1.pdf
  • officer of Cingular. All replies and documentation sent in response to this Notice should be marked with the File No. and NOV No. specified above, and mailed to the following address: Federal Communications Commission Seattle Office 11410 NE 122nd Way, Suite 312 Kirkland, WA 98034 Additionally, pursuant to Section 403 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, and Section 1.17 of the Commission's Rules, provide a complete explanation to the following questions along with the requested information and any relevant documents: What is the make, model and manufacturer of the equipment located at 725 SE Everett Mall Way, Everett, Washington and what caused the equipment at this location to produce the interference? Pursuant to what authority does Cingular operate this
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-261024A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-261024A2.txt
  • 1.60 1.61 1966 32.3 100.1 47.6 52.5 18.9 30.1 3.10 1.47 1.63 1.59 1.61 1967 39.7 114.2 54.6 59.6 23.4 31.8 2.88 1.38 1.50 1.36 1.45 1968 46.4 126.9 61.5 65.4 28.2 40.0 2.73 1.33 1.41 1.42 1.41 1969 64.6 172.0 82.7 89.4 38.3 51.6 2.66 1.28 1.38 1.35 1.37 1970 81.1 196.6 98.9 97.7 51.0 59.8 2.43 1.22 1.21 1.17 1.19 1971 100.9 237.4 120.7 116.6 68.4 75.1 2.35 1.20 1.16 1.10 1.13 1972 126.5 291.8 148.2 143.6 91.7 98.6 2.31 1.17 1.14 1.08 1.11 1973 159.3 364.9 184.4 180.5 111.5 120.2 2.29 1.16 1.13 1.08 1.11 1974 190.7 428.7 216.6 212.1 142.0 152.2 2.25 1.14 1.11 1.07 1.09 1975 219.4 490.2 247.4 242.9 167.0 176.9 2.23 1.13 1.11 1.06
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262766A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262766A1.pdf
  • severe penalties, including, but not limited to, substantial monetary fines, in rem arrest action against the offending radio equipment, and criminal sanctions including imprisonment. (see 47 U.S.C. §§ 401, 501, 503 and 510). UNLICENSED OPERATION OF THESE RADIO STATIONS MUST BE DISCONTINUED IMMEDIATELY. Inquiry Pursuant to Sections 308(b) and 403 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, and Sections 1.17 the FCC's Rules, Broadband is directed to provide a complete explanation to the following questions along with the requested information and any relevant documents: When did Broadband begin operating the wireless cable system in Mamora, New Jersey? What is the current status of operations of the wireless cable system in Mamora, New Jersey? Does Broadband have authorization to operate the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A1.txt
  • and Investment........................................................... 11-1 to 11-28 2 Index of Tables and Charts Access Charges - Interstate - Per Line .................................................................... Table 7.11 Access Charges - Interstate - Per Line - by Carrier ................................................ Table 7.13 Access Charges - Interstate - Per Minute ................................................................Table 7.12 Access Charges - Interstate - Per Minute - by Carrier .............................................. Table 7.14 Adjustment Formula ......................................................................... Table 1.17 Carrier Telecommunications Revenues Reported on FCC Form 499-Q .............. Table 1.9 Changes in Local Exchange Carriers ..................................................... Table 3.36 Consumer Price Indices - Levels ......................................................................... Chart 7.1 Consumer Price Indices - Annual Percentage Changes ...................................... Chart 7.2 Consumer Price Indices - Annual Percentage Changes - Telephone Components .. Chart 7.3 Consumer Price Indices - Average Annual Rates of Change .................................
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A2.txt
  • and Investment........................................................... 11-1 to 11-28 2 Index of Tables and Charts Access Charges - Interstate - Per Line .................................................................... Table 7.11 Access Charges - Interstate - Per Line - by Carrier ................................................ Table 7.13 Access Charges - Interstate - Per Minute ................................................................Table 7.12 Access Charges - Interstate - Per Minute - by Carrier .............................................. Table 7.14 Adjustment Formula ......................................................................... Table 1.17 Carrier Telecommunications Revenues Reported on FCC Form 499-Q .............. Table 1.9 Changes in Local Exchange Carriers ..................................................... Table 3.36 Consumer Price Indices - Levels ......................................................................... Chart 7.1 Consumer Price Indices - Annual Percentage Changes ...................................... Chart 7.2 Consumer Price Indices - Annual Percentage Changes - Telephone Components .. Chart 7.3 Consumer Price Indices - Average Annual Rates of Change .................................
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A3.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A3.txt
  • operating revenues over $121 million for 2002 and revenues over $123 million in 2003. The Statistics of Communications Common Carriers revenue data represent approximately 92 percent of the local telephone industry based on USF loops. Here, data from the Statistics of Communications Common Carriers are expanded to include the entire ILEC industry based on USF loops. Column 1 of Table 1.17 shows USF loops at year-end 2003. Column 2 shows the percent of the ILEC industry that is included in the tables in the Statistics of Communications Common Carriers. It is the average for year-end 2002 and 2003 data.24 The adjustment formula in Column 3 is (100/Column 2). In Table 1.18, ILECs' state local exchange revenues are allocated based on local
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A5.txt
  • MICHIGAN Total -2.88 -5.05 2.28 6.07 310669 A ALLENDALE TEL. CO. -12.13 -16.10 4.73 0.00 310671 C CENTURY TEL. MIDWEST, INC. -1.13 -1.50 0.38 -8.16 310672 C COMM. CORP. OF MICHIGAN 0.63 -7.95 9.32 19.31 310675 A BARAGA TEL. CO. 12.14 -1.36 13.69 129.42 310676 A BARRY COUNTY TEL. CO. 10.06 -1.97 12.27 INFINITE 310677 C ISLAND TEL. CO. -2.32 1.17 -3.44 -25.33 310678 A BLANCHARD TEL. ASSOC., INC. 11.94 -1.26 13.37 277.37 310679 C BLOOMINGDALE TEL. CO. 2.52 -1.14 3.70 1.97 310680 C CHIPPEWA COUNTY TEL. CO. -1.58 -3.10 1.56 -6.50 310682 C FRONTIER COMM. OF MICHIGAN, INC. -19.80 -0.96 -19.02 0.00 310683 C CARR TEL. CO. -1.65 -0.78 -0.88 0.00 310685 C CHATHAM TEL. CO.-MI 5.08 -0.09 5.18 7.21
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A6.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A6.txt
  • 28.56 13,420,333 13.65 14,657,378 14.91 Michigan 1,785,160 44,687,451 25.03 23,787,269 13.33 20,900,183 11.71 Minnesota 846,891 26,504,960 31.30 16,540,378 19.53 9,964,582 11.77 Mississippi 492,645 38,852,160 78.86 24,419,729 49.57 14,432,431 29.30 Missouri 924,445 43,548,617 47.11 18,099,051 19.58 25,449,566 27.53 Montana 149,995 3,959,885 26.40 2,936,427 19.58 1,023,458 6.82 Nebraska 285,402 7,714,469 27.03 6,360,630 22.29 1,353,839 4.74 Nevada 369,498 4,863,132 13.16 4,429,735 11.99 433,397 1.17 New Hampshire 207,671 2,337,760 11.26 1,667,377 8.03 670,383 3.23 New Jersey 1,367,438 55,698,865 40.73 30,051,243 21.98 25,647,623 18.76 New Mexico 320,234 64,232,969 200.58 22,540,649 70.39 41,692,320 130.19 New York 2,888,233 437,315,692 151.41 181,369,130 62.80 255,946,562 88.62 North Carolina 1,335,954 51,680,388 38.68 35,457,926 26.54 16,222,462 12.14 North Dakota 104,225 3,986,252 38.25 3,164,855 30.37 821,397 7.88 Northern Mariana Is. 11,251 1,242,365 110.42
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A9.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A9.txt
  • Number of Sample Cities with Measured/Message Service 83 83 84 84 84 87 87 86 85 85 85 85 85 86 85 85 Cost of a Five-Minute Business-Day Same-Zone Call $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.10 $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.10 Basic Connection Charge $71.05$71.36$72.75$72.55$71.41$69.88$67.87$68.47$68.67$65.83$67.87$67.77$67.04$67.29$67.23$67.24 Additional Connection Charge for Touch-Tone Service**** 1.70 1.89 1.13 1.19 1.17 0.92 0.27 0.17 0.17 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12 **** **** **** Taxes 4.06 4.15 4.32 4.33 4.25 4.13 4.17 4.20 4.45 4.13 4.53 4.40 4.69 5.09 6.95 6.93 Total Connection Charge 76.81 77.40 78.20 78.07 76.83 74.93 72.31 72.85 73.29 70.09 72.55 72.29 71.86 72.39 74.18 74.17 Additional Charge If Drop Line and Connection Block Needed $5.92 $7.87 $6.90 $6.83
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-266857A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-266857A1.txt
  • 85 86 85 86 86 Cost of a Five-Minute, Business-Day, Same-Zone Call $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.10 $0.10 Basic Connection Charge $71.05 $71.36 $72.75 $72.55 $71.41 $69.88 $67.87 $68.47 $68.67 $65.83 $67.87 $67.77 $67.04 $67.29 $67.23 $67.24 $67.35 Additional Connection Charge for Touch-Tone Service 4 1.70 1.89 1.13 1.19 1.17 0.92 0.27 0.17 0.17 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12 a4 a4 a4 a4 Tax, Including 911 Charges 4.06 4.15 4.32 4.33 4.25 4.13 4.17 4.20 4.45 4.13 4.53 4.40 4.69 5.09 6.95 6.42 6.35 Total Connection Charge $76.81 $77.40 $78.20 $78.07 $76.83 $74.93 $72.31 $72.85 $73.29 $70.09 $72.55 $72.29 $71.86 $72.39 $74.18 $74.18 $73.70 Additional Charge if Drop Line and Connection
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A1.txt
  • and Investment........................................................... 11-1 to 11-28 2 Index of Tables and Charts Access Charges - Interstate - Per Line .................................................................... Table 7.11 Access Charges - Interstate - Per Line - by Carrier ................................................ Table 7.13 Access Charges - Interstate - Per Minute ................................................................Table 7.12 Access Charges - Interstate - Per Minute - by Carrier .............................................. Table 7.14 Adjustment Formula ......................................................................... Table 1.17 Carrier Telecommunications Revenues Reported on FCC Form 499-Q .............. Table 1.9 Changes in Local Exchange Carriers ..................................................... Table 3.36 Consumer Price Indices - Levels ......................................................................... Chart 7.1 Consumer Price Indices - Annual Percentage Changes ...................................... Chart 7.2 Consumer Price Indices - Annual Percentage Changes - Telephone Components .. Chart 7.3 Consumer Price Indices - Average Annual Rates of Change .................................
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A2.txt
  • and Investment........................................................... 11-1 to 11-28 2 Index of Tables and Charts Access Charges - Interstate - Per Line .................................................................... Table 7.11 Access Charges - Interstate - Per Line - by Carrier ................................................ Table 7.13 Access Charges - Interstate - Per Minute ................................................................Table 7.12 Access Charges - Interstate - Per Minute - by Carrier .............................................. Table 7.14 Adjustment Formula ......................................................................... Table 1.17 Carrier Telecommunications Revenues Reported on FCC Form 499-Q .............. Table 1.9 Changes in Local Exchange Carriers ..................................................... Table 3.36 Consumer Price Indices - Levels ......................................................................... Chart 7.1 Consumer Price Indices - Annual Percentage Changes ...................................... Chart 7.2 Consumer Price Indices - Annual Percentage Changes - Telephone Components .. Chart 7.3 Consumer Price Indices - Average Annual Rates of Change .................................
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A3.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A3.txt
  • operating revenues over $123 million for 2003 and revenues over $125 million in 2004. The Statistics of Communications Common Carriers revenue data represent approximately 92 percent of the local telephone industry based on USF loops. Here, data from the Statistics of Communications Common Carriers are expanded to include the entire ILEC industry based on USF loops. Column 1 of Table 1.17 shows USF loops at year-end 2004. Column 2 shows the percent of the ILEC industry that is included in the tables in the Statistics of Communications Common Carriers. It is the average for year-end 2003 and 2004 data.26 The adjustment formula in Column 3 is (100/Column 2). In Table 1.18, ILECs' state local exchange revenues are allocated based on local
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A4.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A4.txt
  • 6.24 8.25 6.65 Indiana 6.75 8.25 7.51 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 6.75 8.25 7.51 6.75 8.25 7.51 Iowa 5.25 8.25 7.25 0.00 3.50 0.01 0.00 1.75 0.00 5.25 10.00 7.25 5.25 13.50 7.26 Kansas 6.96 8.25 7.31 3.38 3.50 3.50 1.69 1.75 1.75 8.65 10.00 9.06 12.03 13.50 12.56 Kentucky 7.12 8.25 8.12 0.00 3.50 2.34 0.00 1.75 1.17 7.12 10.00 9.29 7.12 13.50 11.63 Louisiana 8.25 8.25 8.25 0.00 3.50 0.00 0.00 1.75 0.00 8.25 10.00 8.25 8.25 13.50 8.25 Maine 6.50 8.25 8.15 0.00 3.50 3.50 0.00 1.75 1.75 6.50 10.00 9.90 6.50 13.50 13.40 Maryland 7.42 8.25 7.42 0.84 3.50 3.50 0.42 1.75 1.75 7.84 10.00 9.17 8.68 13.50 12.67 Massachusetts 8.13 8.25 8.13 3.50 3.50
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A5.txt
  • -10.11 401144 C CENTURYTEL OF CENTRAL ARKANSAS, LLC -4.61 -3.79 -0.86 -11.48 401144A C CENTURYTEL OF CENTRAL ARKANSAS, LLC -8.13 -7.90 -0.25 0.00 401691 C ALLTEL ARKANSAS, INC. -2.57 -2.06 -0.52 -45.80 401692 C ARKANSAS TELEPHONE COMPANY -9.42 -0.71 -8.76 0.00 401697 C CENTRAL ARKANSAS TEL. COOP INC. -4.48 -1.71 -2.82 -11.14 401698 C CLEVELAND CTY TEL. CO. -0.31 -1.46 1.17 -7.36 401699 C DECATUR TELEPHONE CO INC- ARKANSAS -0.65 -3.72 3.19 -18.00 401702 C SOUTH ARKANSAS TEL. CO.,INC. 17.55 -3.43 21.73 37.38 401704 C LAVACA TELEPHONE-AR 5.60 -6.38 12.80 259.91 401705 C CENTURYTEL OF ARKANSAS, INC. 0.82 -2.55 3.46 0.16 401709 C MADISON COUNTY TEL. CO. INC. 9.27 1.46 7.70 22.98 401710 A MAGAZINE TELEPHONE COMPANY 6.16 -1.47 7.74 18.97
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A9.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A9.txt
  • Sample Cities with Measured/Message Service 83 83 84 84 84 87 87 86 85 85 85 85 85 86 85 86 86 Cost of a Five-Minute Business-Day Same-Zone Call $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.10 $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.10 $0.10 Basic Connection Charge $71.05$71.36$72.75$72.55$71.41$69.88$67.87$68.47$68.67$65.83$67.87$67.77$67.04$67.29$67.23$67.24$67.35 Additional Connection Charge for Touch-Tone Service**** 1.70 1.89 1.13 1.19 1.17 0.92 0.27 0.17 0.17 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12 **** **** **** **** Taxes 4.06 4.15 4.32 4.33 4.25 4.13 4.17 4.20 4.45 4.13 4.53 4.40 4.69 5.09 6.95 6.42 6.35 Total Connection Charge 76.81 77.40 78.20 78.07 76.83 74.93 72.31 72.85 73.29 70.09 72.55 72.29 71.86 72.39 74.18 74.18 73.70 Additional Charge If Drop Line and Connection Block Needed $5.92
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-270407A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-270407A1.txt
  • 85 86 85 86 86 Cost of a Five-Minute Same-Zone Business-Day Call $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.10 $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.10 $0.10 Basic Connection Charge $71.05 $71.36 $72.75 $72.55 $71.41 $69.88 $67.87 $68.47 $68.67 $65.83 $67.87 $67.77 $67.04 $67.29 $67.23 $67.24 $67.35 Additional Connection Charge for Touch-Tone Service 4 1.70 1.89 1.13 1.19 1.17 0.92 0.27 0.17 0.17 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12 4 4 4 4 Taxes, Including 911 Charges 4.06 4.15 4.32 4.33 4.25 4.13 4.17 4.20 4.45 4.13 4.53 4.40 4.69 5.09 6.95 6.42 6.35 Total Connection Charge $76.81 $77.40 $78.20 $78.07 $76.83 $74.93 $72.31 $72.85 $73.29 $70.09 $72.55 $72.29 $71.86 $72.39 $74.18 $74.18 $73.70 Additional Charge if Drop Line and Connection
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-277103A4.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-277103A4.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-277103A4.txt
  • FCC released the Lifeline and Link Up Order further modifying the LI Program. The order expanded the eligibility criteria for qualifying consumers to include an income-based criterion and participation in National School Lunch free lunch program and Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF) as additional criteria. By expanding the eligibility criteria to include an income-based criterion, the Commission estimated that 1.17 million to 1.29 million additional households that do not participate in the program-based criteria would enroll in Lifeline based on the new criteria. In addition, the Lifeline and Link Up Order adopted certification and validation procedures that are designed to minimize potential abuse of the Low Income Program. The FCC required carriers that serve in federal default states to complete
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A1.txt
  • and Investment........................................................... 11-1 to 11-28 2 Index of Tables and Charts Access Charges - Interstate - Per Line .................................................................... Table 7.11 Access Charges - Interstate - Per Line - by Carrier ................................................ Table 7.13 Access Charges - Interstate - Per Minute ................................................................Table 7.12 Access Charges - Interstate - Per Minute - by Carrier .............................................. Table 7.14 Adjustment Formula ......................................................................... Table 1.17 Carrier Telecommunications Revenues Reported on FCC Form 499-Q .............. Table 1.9 Changes in Local Exchange Carriers ..................................................... Table 3.36 Consumer Price Indices - Levels ......................................................................... Chart 7.1 Consumer Price Indices - Annual Percentage Changes ...................................... Chart 7.2 Consumer Price Indices - Annual Percentage Changes - Telephone Components .. Chart 7.3 Consumer Price Indices - Average Annual Rates of Change .................................
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A2.txt
  • and Investment........................................................... 11-1 to 11-28 2 Index of Tables and Charts Access Charges - Interstate - Per Line .................................................................... Table 7.11 Access Charges - Interstate - Per Line - by Carrier ................................................ Table 7.13 Access Charges - Interstate - Per Minute ................................................................Table 7.12 Access Charges - Interstate - Per Minute - by Carrier .............................................. Table 7.14 Adjustment Formula ......................................................................... Table 1.17 Carrier Telecommunications Revenues Reported on FCC Form 499-Q .............. Table 1.9 Changes in Local Exchange Carriers ..................................................... Table 3.36 Consumer Price Indices - Levels ......................................................................... Chart 7.1 Consumer Price Indices - Annual Percentage Changes ...................................... Chart 7.2 Consumer Price Indices - Annual Percentage Changes - Telephone Components .. Chart 7.3 Consumer Price Indices - Average Annual Rates of Change .................................
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A3.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A3.txt
  • the states. ARMIS data include those ILECs with annual operating revenues over $125 million for 2004 and revenues over $129 million in 2005. The ARMIS revenue data represent approximately 92 percent of the local telephone industry based on USF loops. Here, data from ARMIS are expanded to include the entire ILEC industry based on USF loops. Column 1 of Table 1.17 shows USF loops at year-end 2005. Column 2 shows the percent of the ILEC industry that reported in the ARMIS filings. It is the average for year-end 2004 and 2005 data.29 The adjustment formula in Column 3 is (100/Column 2). In Table 1.18, ILECs' state local exchange revenues are allocated based on local exchange service and state miscellaneous revenues from
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A5.txt
  • 0.01 0.06 Michigan 0.37 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.30 0.01 0.14 0.82 Minnesota 1.14 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.27 0.10 0.59 3.13 Mississippi 0.90 0.01 0.00 5.88 0.00 0.49 0.73 0.17 8.18 Missouri 0.99 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.76 0.27 0.17 2.21 Montana 3.28 0.03 0.00 3.18 0.00 2.52 0.11 1.02 10.14 Nebraska 1.79 0.09 0.00 1.02 0.00 1.71 0.53 1.17 6.30 Nevada 0.46 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.40 0.69 0.43 2.00 New Hampshire 0.03 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.23 0.21 0.38 0.86 New Jersey 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.02 New Mexico 2.08 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.08 0.84 0.81 4.81 New York 0.05 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.06 0.10 0.08 0.30 North Carolina 0.19 0.00 0.00
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A9.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A9.txt
  • with Measured/Message Service 83 83 84 84 84 87 87 86 85 85 85 85 85 86 85 86 85 78 Cost of a Five-Minute Business-Day Same-Zone Call $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.10 $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.10 $0.10 $0.09 Basic Connection Charge $71.05$71.36$72.75$72.55$71.41$69.88$67.87$68.47$68.67$65.83$67.87$67.77$67.04$67.29$67.23$67.24$67.35$65.84 Additional Connection Charge for Touch-Tone Service**** 1.70 1.89 1.13 1.19 1.17 0.92 0.27 0.17 0.17 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12 **** **** **** a4 a4 Taxes 4.06 4.15 4.32 4.33 4.25 4.13 4.17 4.20 4.45 4.13 4.53 4.40 4.69 5.09 6.95 6.42 6.15 6.41 Total Connection Charge 76.81 77.40 78.20 78.07 76.83 74.93 72.31 72.85 73.29 70.09 72.55 72.29 71.86 72.39 74.18 74.18 74.18 72.26 Additional Charge If Drop Line and Connection
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279991A1.pdf
  • 50 recommendations for the Commission. The various conference agenda items were assigned to the informal working groups as follows: Informal Working Groups (IWG) Agenda Items (Major WRC-07 Issues) IWG-1 ­ Terrestrial and Space Science Services 1.2, 1.3, 1.5, 1.14, 1.16, & 1.20 IWG-2 ­ Satellite Services including those related to High Altitude Platform Stations (HAPS) 1.6 (Resolution 415), 1.7, 1.8, 1.17, 1.18, 1.19, & 1.21 IWG-3 ­ International Mobile Telephone (IMT-2000) & 2.5 GHz 1.4 & 1.9 IWG-4 ­ Broadcasting and Amateur Services 1.6 (Resolution 414), 1.11, 1.13, 1.15, & 7.1 (Recommendation 952) IWG-5 ­ Regulatory Issues 1.1, 1.0, 1.12, 2, 3, 5, 6, & 7.1 Satellite Digital Audio Radio Service Subscribers 0.69 2.10 4.42 6.90 8.25 0.48 1.81 4.68 7.14
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-282148A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-282148A1.pdf
  • determine what, if any, enforcement action is required to ensure compliance. Any false statement made knowingly and willfully in reply to this Notice is punishable by fine or imprisonment under Title 18 of the U.S. Code. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Thomas N. Van Stavern District Director San Francisco District Office Western Region Enforcement Bureau 47 C.F.R. § 1.89. 47 C.F.R. § 1.17. 47 U.S.C. § 403. P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. § 552a(e)(3). 18 U.S.C. § 1001 et seq. Federal Communications Commission Federal Communications Commission $ ' ' ' ' " Œ `` `` - ! " F H I J K T U V a b c d † ˆ ‰ Š ‹ Œ � Ž � `` ‹ `` - !
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-282596A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-282596A1.pdf
  • commission or omission is continuous, for more than one day.'' 47 U.S.C. § 302a(b). 47 C.F.R. § 2.803(a)(1). 47 C.F.R. § 15.3. 47 C.F.R. § 15.201(b). 47 C.F.R. § 2.907(a). 12 FCC Rcd 17087 (1997), recon. denied, 15 FCC Rcd 303 (1999); 47 C.F.R. §1.80. 47 U.S.C. § 503(b)(2)(E). 18 U.S.C. §§ 1001 et seq; see also 47 C.F.R. § 1.17. 47 U.S.C. §§ 302a(b), 503(b), 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.111, 0.311, 0.314, 1.80, 2.803(a)(1). 47 U.S.C. § 403. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1914. (...continued from previous page) (continued....) Federal Communications Commission Federal Communications Commission } (c) ª " $ $ Æ � F 0 ` e ° ²
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-283331A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-283331A1.pdf
  • determine what, if any, enforcement action is required to ensure compliance. Any false statement made knowingly and willfully in reply to this Notice is punishable by fine or imprisonment under Title 18 of the U.S. Code. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Thomas N. Van Stavern District Director San Francisco District Office Western Region Enforcement Bureau 47 C.F.R. § 1.89. 47 C.F.R. § 1.17. 47 U.S.C. § 403. P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. § 552a(e)(3). 18 U.S.C. § 1001 et seq. Federal Communications Commission Federal Communications Commission $ ¨ ª " ¬ Î Ï Ð Ñ ç ù ª " ¬ Î Ï Ð Ñ ç ù ß æ Ñ ç Ñ Ñ × Ø Ù Û Þ à æ ç #yJ #yJ
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-283332A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-283332A1.pdf
  • reply, to determine what, if any, enforcement action is required to ensure compliance. Any false statement made knowingly and willfully in reply to this Notice is punishable by fine or imprisonment under Title 18 of the U.S. Code. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Thomas N. VanStavern District Director San Francisco Office Western Region Enforcement Bureau 47 C.F.R. § 1.89. 47 C.F.R. § 1.17. 47 U.S.C. § 403. P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. § 552a(e)(3). 18 U.S.C. § 1001 et seq. Federal Communications Commission Federal Communications Commission „Ð]„Ð^„Ð`„Ð $ ¿ Ú #yJ #yJ
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-283656A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-283656A1.pdf
  • to determine what, if any, enforcement action is required to ensure compliance. Any false statement made knowingly and willfully in reply to this Notice is punishable by fine or imprisonment under Title 18 of the U.S. Code. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION James D. Wells District Director Dallas District Office South Central Region Enforcement Bureau 47 C.F.R. § 1.89. 47 C.F.R. § 1.17. 47 U.S.C. § 308(b). P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. § 552a(e)(3). 18 U.S.C. § 1001 et seq. Federal Communications Commission Federal Communications Commission � Ž ý þ $ š š š 6 › ) * , - / 0 2 3 5 6 X Y Z c d e p s t - - ˜ › › * * , ,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-284932A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-284932A1.txt
  • 78 Cost of a Five-Minute Same-Zone Business-Day Call $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.10 $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.10 $0.10 $0.09 $0.10 Basic Connection Charge $71.05 $71.36 $72.75 $72.55 $71.41 $69.88 $67.87 $68.47 $68.67 $65.83 $67.87 $67.77 $67.04 $67.29 $67.23 $67.24 $67.35 $62.95 $63.07 Additional Connection Charge for Touch-Tone Service 4 1.70 1.89 1.13 1.19 1.17 0.92 0.27 0.17 0.17 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12 4 4 4 4 4 4 Taxes, Including 911 Charges 4.06 4.15 4.32 4.33 4.25 4.13 4.17 4.20 4.45 4.13 4.53 4.40 4.69 5.09 6.95 6.42 6.35 6.50 6.11 Total Connection Charge $76.81 $77.40 $78.20 $78.07 $76.83 $74.93 $72.31 $72.85 $73.29 $70.09 $72.55 $72.29 $71.86 $72.39 $74.18 $74.18 $73.70 $74.18 $69.18 Additional
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-284934A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-284934A1.txt
  • 78 Cost of a Five-Minute, Business-Day, Same-Zone Call $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.10 $0.10 $0.09 $0.11 Basic Connection Charge $71.05 $71.36 $72.75 $72.55 $71.41 $69.88 $67.87 $68.47 $68.67 $65.83 $67.87 $67.77 $67.04 $67.29 $67.23 $67.24 $67.35 $62.55 $62.67 Additional Connection Charge for Touch-Tone Service 4 1.70 1.89 1.13 1.19 1.17 0.92 0.27 0.17 0.17 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12 a4 a4 a4 a4 a4 a4 Tax, Including 911 Charges 4.06 4.15 4.32 4.33 4.25 4.13 4.17 4.20 4.45 4.13 4.53 4.40 4.69 5.09 6.95 6.42 6.15 6.41 6.06 Total Connection Charge $76.81 $77.40 $78.20 $78.07 $76.83 $74.93 $72.31 $72.85 $73.29 $70.09 $72.55 $72.29 $71.86 $72.39 $74.18 $73.66 $73.50 $68.96 $68.74 Additional
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-286436A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-286436A1.pdf
  • determine what, if any, enforcement action is required to ensure compliance. Any false statement made knowingly and willfully in reply to this Notice is punishable by fine or imprisonment under Title 18 of the U.S. Code. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Thomas N. Van Stavern District Director San Francisco District Office Western Region Enforcement Bureau 47 C.F.R. § 1.89. 47 C.F.R. § 1.17. 47 U.S.C. § 403. P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. § 552a(e)(3). 18 U.S.C. § 1001 et seq. Federal Communications Commission Federal Communications Commission $ 0 š ¡ # $ & ' ) * , - / 0 T V W X Y b c d o p q r '' - - ˜ tm š › œ � ¡ # $
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-286437A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-286437A1.pdf
  • determine what, if any, enforcement action is required to ensure compliance. Any false statement made knowingly and willfully in reply to this Notice is punishable by fine or imprisonment under Title 18 of the U.S. Code. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Thomas N. Van Stavern District Director San Francisco District Office Western Region Enforcement Bureau 47 C.F.R. § 1.89. 47 C.F.R. § 1.17. 47 U.S.C. § 403. P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. § 552a(e)(3). 18 U.S.C. § 1001 et seq. Federal Communications Commission Federal Communications Commission á å æ æ ç $ æ #yJ #yJ
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-286913A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-286913A1.pdf
  • determine what, if any, enforcement action is required to ensure compliance. Any false statement made knowingly and willfully in reply to this Notice is punishable by fine or imprisonment under Title 18 of the U.S. Code. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Margaret Egler Acting Interim District Director Los Angeles District Office Western Region Enforcement Bureau 47 C.F.R. § 1.89. 47 C.F.R. § 1.17. 47 U.S.C. § 403. P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. § 552a(e)(3). 18 U.S.C. § 1001 et seq. Federal Communications Commission Federal Communications Commission ÿ $ # # # # $ - $ $ $ ! $ $ ! $ #yJ #yJ $ #
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287688A1.pdf
  • and Investment........................................................... 11-1 to 11-28 2 Index of Tables and Charts Access Charges - Interstate - Per Line .................................................................... Table 7.11 Access Charges - Interstate - Per Line - by Carrier ................................................ Table 7.13 Access Charges - Interstate - Per Minute ................................................................Table 7.12 Access Charges - Interstate - Per Minute - by Carrier .............................................. Table 7.14 Adjustment Formula ......................................................................... Table 1.17 Carrier Telecommunications Revenues Reported on FCC Form 499-Q .............. Table 1.9 Changes in Local Exchange Carriers ..................................................... Table 3.36 Consumer Price Indices - Levels ......................................................................... Chart 7.1 Consumer Price Indices - Annual Percentage Changes ...................................... Chart 7.2 Consumer Price Indices - Annual Percentage Changes - Telephone Components .. Chart 7.3 Consumer Price Indices - Average Annual Rates of Change .................................
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287688A2.pdf
  • and Investment........................................................... 11-1 to 11-28 2 Index of Tables and Charts Access Charges - Interstate - Per Line .................................................................... Table 7.11 Access Charges - Interstate - Per Line - by Carrier ................................................ Table 7.13 Access Charges - Interstate - Per Minute ................................................................Table 7.12 Access Charges - Interstate - Per Minute - by Carrier .............................................. Table 7.14 Adjustment Formula ......................................................................... Table 1.17 Carrier Telecommunications Revenues Reported on FCC Form 499-Q .............. Table 1.9 Changes in Local Exchange Carriers ..................................................... Table 3.36 Consumer Price Indices - Levels ......................................................................... Chart 7.1 Consumer Price Indices - Annual Percentage Changes ...................................... Chart 7.2 Consumer Price Indices - Annual Percentage Changes - Telephone Components .. Chart 7.3 Consumer Price Indices - Average Annual Rates of Change .................................
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287688A3.pdf
  • the states. ARMIS data include those ILECs with annual operating revenues over $129 million for 2005 and revenues over $134 million in 2006. The ARMIS revenue data represent approximately 92 percent of the local telephone industry based on USF loops. Here, data from ARMIS are expanded to include the entire ILEC industry based on USF loops. Column 1 of Table 1.17 shows USF loops at year-end 2006. Column 2 shows the percent of the ILEC industry that reported in the ARMIS filings. It is the average for year-end 2005 and 2006 data.30 The adjustment formula in Column 3 is (100/Column 2). In Table 1.18, ILECs' state local exchange revenues are allocated based on local exchange service and state miscellaneous revenues from
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287688A5.pdf
  • 19.15 -3.58 23.57 31.22 613008 C ACS OF FAIRBANKS, INC. -2.44 -1.23 -1.23 -69.99 613010 C ACS - NORTHLAND GLACIER STATE -4.85 -0.63 -4.25 -15.81 613011 C INTERIOR TELEPHONE COMPANY INC. -4.42 -1.23 -3.22 -8.52 613011A C INTERIOR TELEPHONE COMPANY INC. -0.73 -3.25 2.60 -1.62 613012 C ACS - ALASKA JUNEAU -8.83 -2.41 -6.57 0.00 613013 C KETCHIKAN PUBLIC UTILITIES -1.17 -3.27 2.17 -2.94 613015 C MATANUSKA TELEPHONE ASSOC., INC. 3.48 0.12 3.36 4.09 613016 C MUKLUK TEL. COMPANY, INC. -0.40 1.65 -2.01 -3.69 613016A C MUKLUK TEL. COMPANY, INC. 5.07 -3.36 8.72 0.00 613017 C ALASKA TELEPHONE COMPANY 6.58 -3.87 10.88 17.48 613017A C ALASKA TELEPHONE COMPANY 6.40 -0.61 7.06 0.00 613018 C NUSHAGAK ELECTRIC & TELEPHONE COOP., INC. 7.57
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287688A9.pdf
  • 78 Cost of a Five-Minute, Business-Day, Same-Zone Call $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.10 $0.10 $0.09 $0.11 Basic Connection Charge $71.05 $71.36 $72.75 $72.55 $71.41 $69.88 $67.87 $68.47 $68.67 $65.83 $67.87 $67.77 $67.04 $67.29 $67.23 $67.24 $67.35 $62.55 $62.67 Additional Connection Charge for Touch-Tone Service 4 1.70 1.89 1.13 1.19 1.17 0.92 0.27 0.17 0.17 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12 a4 a4 a4 a4 a4 a4 Tax, Including 911 Charges 4.06 4.15 4.32 4.33 4.25 4.13 4.17 4.20 4.45 4.13 4.53 4.40 4.69 5.09 6.95 6.42 6.15 6.41 6.06 Total Connection Charge $76.81 $77.40 $78.20 $78.07 $76.83 $74.93 $72.31 $72.85 $73.29 $70.09 $72.55 $72.29 $71.86 $72.39 $74.18 $73.66 $73.50 $68.96 $68.74 Additional
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A1.txt
  • Service ........................................................................................ 9-1 to 9-13 2 Index of Tables and Charts Access Charges - Interstate - Per Line .................................................................... Table 7.7 Access Charges - Interstate - Per Line - by Carrier ................................................ Table 7.9 Access Charges - Interstate - Per Minute ................................................................Table 7.8 Access Charges - Interstate - Per Minute - by Carrier .............................................. Table 7.10 Adjustment Formula ......................................................................... Table 1.17 Carrier Telecommunications Revenues Reported on FCC Form 499-Q .............. Table 1.9 Changes in Local Exchange Carriers ..................................................... Table 3.36 Consumer Price Indices - Levels ......................................................................... Chart 7.1 Consumer Price Indices - Annual Percentage Changes ...................................... Chart 7.2 Consumer Price Indices - Annual Percentage Changes - Telephone Components .. Chart 7.3 Consumer Price Indices - Average Annual Rates of Change .................................
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A2.txt
  • Service ........................................................................................ 9-1 to 9-13 2 Index of Tables and Charts Access Charges - Interstate - Per Line .................................................................... Table 7.7 Access Charges - Interstate - Per Line - by Carrier ................................................ Table 7.9 Access Charges - Interstate - Per Minute ................................................................Table 7.8 Access Charges - Interstate - Per Minute - by Carrier .............................................. Table 7.10 Adjustment Formula ......................................................................... Table 1.17 Carrier Telecommunications Revenues Reported on FCC Form 499-Q .............. Table 1.9 Changes in Local Exchange Carriers ..................................................... Table 3.36 Consumer Price Indices - Levels ......................................................................... Chart 7.1 Consumer Price Indices - Annual Percentage Changes ...................................... Chart 7.2 Consumer Price Indices - Annual Percentage Changes - Telephone Components .. Chart 7.3 Consumer Price Indices - Average Annual Rates of Change .................................
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A3.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A3.txt
  • the states. ARMIS data include those ILECs with annual operating revenues over $134 million for 2006 and revenues over $138 million in 2007. The ARMIS revenue data represent approximately 93 percent of the local telephone industry based on USF loops. Here, data from ARMIS are expanded to include the entire ILEC industry based on USF loops. Column 1 of Table 1.17 shows USF loops at year-end 2007. Column 2 shows the percent of the ILEC industry that reported in the ARMIS filings. It is the average for year-end 2006 and 2007 data.31 The adjustment formula in Column 3 is (100/Column 2). In Table 1.18, ILECs' state local exchange revenues are allocated based on local exchange service and state miscellaneous revenues from
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A5.txt
  • SWAYZEE TEL. CO., INC. -4.79 -8.31 3.84 -20.42 320827 A SWEETSER RURAL TEL. CO., INC. 4.39 -2.46 7.02 53.40 320828 C FRONTIER COMM. OF THORNTOWN, INC. 12.24 -4.17 17.12 0.00 320829 A TIPTON TEL. CO., INC. 6.35 -6.66 13.94 0.00 320830 A TRI-COUNTY TEL. CO., INC.-IN -4.66 -7.14 2.67 -27.06 320832 C UNITED TEL. CO. OF INDIANA, INC. -4.00 -5.11 1.17 0.00 320834 C WASH. CTY. RURAL TEL. COOP., INC. -7.83 -3.50 -4.49 -26.62 320837 A WEST POINT TEL. CO., INC. -0.34 -2.58 2.30 -25.99 320839 A YEOMAN TEL. CO., INC. -0.29 -3.34 3.15 -21.72 323034 C VERIZON NORTH INC.-IN (ALLTEL) -2.98 -3.82 0.88 0.00 325080 C INDIANA BELL TEL. CO. 7.43 -7.55 16.20 0.00 IOWA TOTAL 5.63 -6.51 12.98 -15.21
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295454A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295454A1.pdf
  • shall be subscribed by the declarant as true under penalty of perjury, and dated, in substantially the following form . . . : `I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on (date). (Signature)'.'' 47 C.F.R. § 1.16. 18 U.S.C. § 1001 et seq. See also 47 C.F.R. § 1.17. P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. § 552a(e)(3). Federal Communications Commission Federal Communications Commission € $ _ #yJ #yJ
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295455A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295455A1.pdf
  • shall be subscribed by the declarant as true under penalty of perjury, and dated, in substantially the following form . . . : `I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on (date). (Signature)'.'' 47 C.F.R. § 1.16. 18 U.S.C. § 1001 et seq. See also 47 C.F.R. § 1.17. P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. § 552a(e)(3). Federal Communications Commission Federal Communications Commission € $ #yJ #yJ
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295456A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295456A1.pdf
  • shall be subscribed by the declarant as true under penalty of perjury, and dated, in substantially the following form . . . : `I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on (date). (Signature)'.'' 47 C.F.R. § 1.16. 18 U.S.C. § 1001 et seq. See also 47 C.F.R. § 1.17. P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. § 552a(e)(3). Federal Communications Commission Federal Communications Commission $ - #yJ #yJ
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295457A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295457A1.pdf
  • shall be subscribed by the declarant as true under penalty of perjury, and dated, in substantially the following form . . . : `I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on (date). (Signature)'.'' 47 C.F.R. § 1.16. 18 U.S.C. § 1001 et seq. See also 47 C.F.R. § 1.17. P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. § 552a(e)(3). Federal Communications Commission Federal Communications Commission € $ Ž #yJ #yJ
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295458A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295458A1.pdf
  • shall be subscribed by the declarant as true under penalty of perjury, and dated, in substantially the following form . . . : `I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on (date). (Signature)'.'' 47 C.F.R. § 1.16. 18 U.S.C. § 1001 et seq. See also 47 C.F.R. § 1.17. P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. § 552a(e)(3). Federal Communications Commission Federal Communications Commission ] _ ^ € ^ _ $ e f ˆ œ Â Ü ú û e f ˆ œ Â Ü ú û e f ˆ œ Â Ü ú û ^ #yJ #yJ d d d
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295596A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295596A1.pdf
  • shall be subscribed by the declarant as true under penalty of perjury, and dated, in substantially the following form . . . : `I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on (date). (Signature)'.'' 47 C.F.R. § 1.16. 18 U.S.C. § 1001 et seq. See also 47 C.F.R. § 1.17. P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. § 552a(e)(3). Federal Communications Commission Federal Communications Commission ‡ ˆ ¹ $ #yJ #yJ
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295627A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295627A1.pdf
  • shall be subscribed by the declarant as true under penalty of perjury, and dated, in substantially the following form . . . : `I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on (date). (Signature)'.'' 47 C.F.R. § 1.16. 18 U.S.C. § 1001 et seq. See also 47 C.F.R. § 1.17. P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. § 552a(e)(3). Federal Communications Commission Federal Communications Commission € $ Ã % 5 P Q § ¨ (c) ª " ¬ 5 Q (c) ¬ #yJ #yJ
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295629A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295629A1.pdf
  • shall be subscribed by the declarant as true under penalty of perjury, and dated, in substantially the following form . . . : `I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on (date). (Signature)'.'' 47 C.F.R. § 1.16. 18 U.S.C. § 1001 et seq. See also 47 C.F.R. § 1.17. P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. § 552a(e)(3). Federal Communications Commission Federal Communications Commission € $ � 2 3 t u v w x 3 s x #yJ #yJ
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295634A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295634A1.pdf
  • shall be subscribed by the declarant as true under penalty of perjury, and dated, in substantially the following form . . . : `I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on (date). (Signature)'.'' 47 C.F.R. § 1.16. 18 U.S.C. § 1001 et seq. See also 47 C.F.R. § 1.17. P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. § 552a(e)(3). Federal Communications Commission Federal Communications Commission € $ ] ^ _ � � ¾ Ø Ù Ú ] ^ _ � � ¾ Ø Ù Ú ] ^ #yJ #yJ ^ ^ ^
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295635A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295635A1.pdf
  • shall be subscribed by the declarant as true under penalty of perjury, and dated, in substantially the following form . . . : `I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on (date). (Signature)'.'' 47 C.F.R. § 1.16. 18 U.S.C. § 1001 et seq. See also 47 C.F.R. § 1.17. P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. § 552a(e)(3). Federal Communications Commission Federal Communications Commission $ q #yJ #yJ
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295637A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295637A1.pdf
  • shall be subscribed by the declarant as true under penalty of perjury, and dated, in substantially the following form . . . : `I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on (date). (Signature)'.'' 47 C.F.R. § 1.16. 18 U.S.C. § 1001 et seq. See also 47 C.F.R. § 1.17. P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. § 552a(e)(3). Federal Communications Commission Federal Communications Commission p „Ð]„Ð € p q $ } p 1 6 #yJ #yJ
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295639A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295639A1.pdf
  • shall be subscribed by the declarant as true under penalty of perjury, and dated, in substantially the following form . . . : `I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on (date). (Signature)'.'' 47 C.F.R. § 1.16. 18 U.S.C. § 1001 et seq. See also 47 C.F.R. § 1.17. P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. § 552a(e)(3). Federal Communications Commission Federal Communications Commission € (R) ¯ $ 7 7 #yJ #yJ
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295640A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295640A1.pdf
  • shall be subscribed by the declarant as true under penalty of perjury, and dated, in substantially the following form . . . : `I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on (date). (Signature)'.'' 47 C.F.R. § 1.16. 18 U.S.C. § 1001 et seq. See also 47 C.F.R. § 1.17. P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. § 552a(e)(3). Federal Communications Commission Federal Communications Commission € 2 3 $ ` ` ` ` #yJ #yJ
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295651A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295651A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295651A1.txt
  • properly filed the instant request in ULS on January 8, 2010. Motion at 1. Motion at 1. AST Telecom notes that it ``will file the corresponding change of address to ensure that future facsimiles be directed to 787-620-6777.'' Id. Motion at 2. 47 C.F.R. § 1.46. 47 C.F.R. § 1.46(a). See Division Letter at 5-6 (citing 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.65(a); 1.17; 1.934(c)). We also note that the Commission recently emphasized the importance of an applicant promptly furnishing additional or corrected information in amending 47 C.F.R. § 1.65(a) to require that such modifications shall be made within five business days. See Procedural Amendments to Commission Part 1 Competitive Bidding Rules, Memorandum Opinion and Order, WT Docket 10-14 (rel. Jan. 7, 2010). See
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295830A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295830A1.pdf
  • shall be subscribed by the declarant as true under penalty of perjury, and dated, in substantially the following form . . . : `I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on (date). (Signature)'.'' 47 C.F.R. § 1.16. 18 U.S.C. § 1001 et seq. See also 47 C.F.R. § 1.17. P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. § 552a(e)(3). Federal Communications Commission Federal Communications Commission € $ #yJ #yJ
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295831A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295831A1.pdf
  • shall be subscribed by the declarant as true under penalty of perjury, and dated, in substantially the following form . . . : 'I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on (date). (Signature)'." 47 C.F.R. § 1.16. 18 U.S.C. § 1001 et seq. See also 47 C.F.R. § 1.17. P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. § 552a(e)(3). Federal Communications Commission Federal Communications Commission $ þ #yJ #yJ
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295833A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295833A1.pdf
  • shall be subscribed by the declarant as true under penalty of perjury, and dated, in substantially the following form . . . : `I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on (date). (Signature)'.'' 47 C.F.R. § 1.16. 18 U.S.C. § 1001 et seq. See also 47 C.F.R. § 1.17. P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. § 552a(e)(3). Federal Communications Commission Federal Communications Commission `` € `` '' $ f j k j k j k `` ¸ ¹ Å Æ É Ê Ì Í #yJ #yJ
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295906A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295906A1.pdf
  • shall be subscribed by the declarant as true under penalty of perjury, and dated, in substantially the following form . . . : `I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on (date). (Signature)'.'' 47 C.F.R. § 1.16. 18 U.S.C. § 1001 et seq. See also 47 C.F.R. § 1.17. P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. § 552a(e)(3). Federal Communications Commission Federal Communications Commission Ò Ó $ #yJ #yJ
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295908A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295908A1.pdf
  • shall be subscribed by the declarant as true under penalty of perjury, and dated, in substantially the following form . . . : `I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on (date). (Signature)'.'' 47 C.F.R. § 1.16. 18 U.S.C. § 1001 et seq. See also 47 C.F.R. § 1.17. P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. § 552a(e)(3). Federal Communications Commission Federal Communications Commission V W \ s € Z \ $ #yJ #yJ
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295909A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295909A1.pdf
  • shall be subscribed by the declarant as true under penalty of perjury, and dated, in substantially the following form . . . : `I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on (date). (Signature)'.'' 47 C.F.R. § 1.16. 18 U.S.C. § 1001 et seq. See also 47 C.F.R. § 1.17. P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. § 552a(e)(3). Federal Communications Commission Federal Communications Commission $ g O P O P O P #yJ #yJ
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295911A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295911A1.pdf
  • shall be subscribed by the declarant as true under penalty of perjury, and dated, in substantially the following form . . . : `I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on (date). (Signature)'.'' 47 C.F.R. § 1.16. 18 U.S.C. § 1001 et seq. See also 47 C.F.R. § 1.17. P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. § 552a(e)(3). Federal Communications Commission Federal Communications Commission $ #yJ #yJ
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295912A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295912A1.pdf
  • in your reply, to determine what, if any, enforcement action is required to ensure compliance. Any false statement made knowingly and willfully in reply to this Notice is punishable by fine or imprisonment under Title 18 of the U.S. Code. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Ryan Hagihara Resident Agent Honolulu Office Western Region Enforcement Bureau 47 C.F.R. § 1.89. 47 C.F.R. § 1.17. 47 U.S.C. § 403. P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. § 552a(e)(3). 18 U.S.C. § 1001 et seq. Federal Communications Commission Federal Communications Commission $ º º º º Œ ¶ " " ! " = > @ A C D F G I J n p q r s | } ~ ‰ Š ‹ Œ (R) ° ± ² ³
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-296413A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-296413A1.pdf
  • shall be subscribed by the declarant as true under penalty of perjury, and dated, in substantially the following form . . . : `I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on (date). (Signature)'.'' 47 C.F.R. § 1.16. 18 U.S.C. § 1001 et seq. See also 47 C.F.R. § 1.17. P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. § 552a(e)(3). Federal Communications Commission Federal Communications Commission € $ ! #yJ #yJ
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-296418A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-296418A1.pdf
  • shall be subscribed by the declarant as true under penalty of perjury, and dated, in substantially the following form . . . : `I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on (date). (Signature)'.'' 47 C.F.R. § 1.16. 18 U.S.C. § 1001 et seq. See also 47 C.F.R. § 1.17. P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. § 552a(e)(3). Federal Communications Commission Federal Communications Commission € $ e i j i j i j #yJ #yJ Ò Ò Ò
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-296419A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-296419A1.pdf
  • shall be subscribed by the declarant as true under penalty of perjury, and dated, in substantially the following form . . . : `I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on (date). (Signature)'.'' 47 C.F.R. § 1.16. 18 U.S.C. § 1001 et seq. See also 47 C.F.R. § 1.17. P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. § 552a(e)(3). Federal Communications Commission Federal Communications Commission € $ ‹ � � � � � � #yJ #yJ ò ò ò
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-296581A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-296581A1.pdf
  • shall be subscribed by the declarant as true under penalty of perjury, and dated, in substantially the following form . . . : `I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on (date). (Signature)'.'' 47 C.F.R. § 1.16. 18 U.S.C. § 1001 et seq. See also 47 C.F.R. § 1.17. P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. § 552a(e)(3). 18 U.S.C. § 1001 et seq. Federal Communications Commission Federal Communications Commission €€ ¨ (c) $ #yJ #yJ
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-296712A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-296712A1.pdf
  • shall be subscribed by the declarant as true under penalty of perjury, and dated, in substantially the following form . . . : `I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on (date). (Signature)'.'' 47 C.F.R. § 1.16. 18 U.S.C. § 1001 et seq. See also 47 C.F.R. § 1.17. P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. § 552a(e)(3). Federal Communications Commission Federal Communications Commission C † Ã € $ Ù Ý Þ Ý Þ Ý Þ #yJ #yJ
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-296842A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-296842A1.pdf
  • shall be subscribed by the declarant as true under penalty of perjury, and dated, in substantially the following form . . . : `I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on (date). (Signature)'.'' 47 C.F.R. § 1.16. 18 U.S.C. § 1001 et seq. See also 47 C.F.R. § 1.17. P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. § 552a(e)(3). Federal Communications Commission Federal Communications Commission € Š ‹ $ ² ¸ #yJ #yJ
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-296847A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-296847A1.pdf
  • shall be subscribed by the declarant as true under penalty of perjury, and dated, in substantially the following form . . . : `I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on (date). (Signature)'.'' 47 C.F.R. § 1.16. 18 U.S.C. § 1001 et seq. See also 47 C.F.R. § 1.17. P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. § 552a(e)(3). Federal Communications Commission Federal Communications Commission € $ #yJ „l l ^„l #yJ r
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-297322A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-297322A1.pdf
  • shall be subscribed by the declarant as true under penalty of perjury, and dated, in substantially the following form . . . : `I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on (date). (Signature)'.'' 47 C.F.R. § 1.16. 18 U.S.C. § 1001 et seq. See also 47 C.F.R. § 1.17. P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. § 552a(e)(3). Federal Communications Commission Federal Communications Commission $ ð5ó ó „¸ #yJ #yJ
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-298186A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-298186A1.pdf
  • shall be subscribed by the declarant as true under penalty of perjury, and dated, in substantially the following form . . . : `I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on (date). (Signature)'.'' 47 C.F.R. § 1.16. 18 U.S.C. § 1001 et seq. See also 47 C.F.R. § 1.17. P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. § 552a(e)(3). Federal Communications Commission Federal Communications Commission € $ é ; K [ v w Í Î Ï Ð Ñ Ò [ w - ˜ � ž ª " ¯ ² Ï Ò #yJ #yJ
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-298343A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-298343A1.pdf
  • shall be subscribed by the declarant as true under penalty of perjury, and dated, in substantially the following form . . . : `I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on (date). (Signature)'.'' 47 C.F.R. § 1.16. 18 U.S.C. § 1001 et seq. See also 47 C.F.R. § 1.17. 47 U.S.C. § 308(b). P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. § 552a(e)(3). 18 U.S.C. § 1001 et seq. Federal Communications Commission Federal Communications Commission $ 0 0 È È #yJ #yJ
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-298527A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-298527A1.pdf
  • shall be subscribed by the declarant as true under penalty of perjury, and dated, in substantially the following form . . . : `I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on (date). (Signature)'.'' 47 C.F.R. § 1.16. 18 U.S.C. § 1001 et seq. See also 47 C.F.R. § 1.17. P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. § 552a(e)(3). Federal Communications Commission Federal Communications Commission t u € t u $ p q `` £ Á Ô Õ p q `` £ Á Ô Õ #yJ #yJ 6 6 6
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-298637A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-298637A1.pdf
  • shall be subscribed by the declarant as true under penalty of perjury, and dated, in substantially the following form . . . : `I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on (date). (Signature)'.'' 47 C.F.R. § 1.16. 18 U.S.C. § 1001 et seq. See also 47 C.F.R. § 1.17. P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. § 552a(e)(3). Federal Communications Commission Federal Communications Commission € $ A * % & ' ( ) * % & ' ( ) * ' * #yJ #yJ
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-298638A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-298638A1.pdf
  • shall be subscribed by the declarant as true under penalty of perjury, and dated, in substantially the following form . . . : `I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on (date). (Signature)'.'' 47 C.F.R. § 1.16. 18 U.S.C. § 1001 et seq. See also 47 C.F.R. § 1.17. P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. § 552a(e)(3). Federal Communications Commission Federal Communications Commission € $ Ù $ 4 D _ ` ½ ¾ ¿ À Á Â D ` ‰ Š • - ˜ tm ¢ ¿ Â #yJ #yJ
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-299106A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-299106A1.pdf
  • shall be subscribed by the declarant as true under penalty of perjury, and dated, in substantially the following form . . . : `I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on (date). (Signature)'.'' 47 C.F.R. § 1.16. 18 U.S.C. § 1001 et seq. See also 47 C.F.R. § 1.17. P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. § 552a(e)(3). Federal Communications Commission Federal Communications Commission ß € Ý ß $ · ¸ Ú ô · ¸ Ú ô · #yJ #yJ € € €
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-299107A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-299107A1.pdf
  • shall be subscribed by the declarant as true under penalty of perjury, and dated, in substantially the following form . . . : `I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on (date). (Signature)'.'' 47 C.F.R. § 1.16. 18 U.S.C. § 1001 et seq. See also 47 C.F.R. § 1.17. P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. § 552a(e)(3). Federal Communications Commission Federal Communications Commission € Å Ç È $ È #yJ #yJ v�Y\
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-299108A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-299108A1.pdf
  • shall be subscribed by the declarant as true under penalty of perjury, and dated, in substantially the following form . . . : `I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on (date). (Signature)'.'' 47 C.F.R. § 1.16. 18 U.S.C. § 1001 et seq. See also 47 C.F.R. § 1.17. P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. § 552a(e)(3). Federal Communications Commission Federal Communications Commission þ € ù û $ #yJ #yJ
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-299110A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-299110A1.pdf
  • shall be subscribed by the declarant as true under penalty of perjury, and dated, in substantially the following form . . . : `I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on (date). (Signature)'.'' 47 C.F.R. § 1.16. 18 U.S.C. § 1001 et seq. See also 47 C.F.R. § 1.17. P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. § 552a(e)(3). Federal Communications Commission Federal Communications Commission $ #yJ #yJ
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-299114A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-299114A1.pdf
  • shall be subscribed by the declarant as true under penalty of perjury, and dated, in substantially the following form . . . : `I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on (date). (Signature)'.'' 47 C.F.R. § 1.16. 18 U.S.C. § 1001 et seq. See also 47 C.F.R. § 1.17. P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. § 552a(e)(3). Federal Communications Commission Federal Communications Commission € $ h m n m n m n #yJ #yJ ¼ ¼ ¼
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-299115A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-299115A1.pdf
  • shall be subscribed by the declarant as true under penalty of perjury, and dated, in substantially the following form . . . : `I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on (date). (Signature)'.'' 47 C.F.R. § 1.16. 18 U.S.C. § 1001 et seq. See also 47 C.F.R. § 1.17. P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. § 552a(e)(3). Federal Communications Commission Federal Communications Commission € $ Ž #yJ #yJ
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-299874A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-299874A1.pdf
  • shall be subscribed by the declarant as true under penalty of perjury, and dated, in substantially the following form . . . : `I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on (date). (Signature)'.'' 47 C.F.R. § 1.16. 18 U.S.C. § 1001 et seq. See also 47 C.F.R. § 1.17. P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. § 552a(e)(3). Federal Communications Commission Federal Communications Commission € $ #yJ #yJ
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-300854A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-300854A1.pdf
  • shall be subscribed by the declarant as true under penalty of perjury, and dated, in substantially the following form . . . : `I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on (date). (Signature)'.'' 47 C.F.R. § 1.16. 18 U.S.C. § 1001 et seq. See also 47 C.F.R. § 1.17. Federal Communications Commission Federal Communications Commission + $ R % 5 P ¢ £ ¤ ¥ Ç È É Ê Ë Ù è ø % 5 P Q ¢ £ ¤ ¥ Ç È É Ê Ë Ù è ø R V 5 Q R V #yJ #yJ ó ó ó
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-300922A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-300922A1.pdf
  • be subscribed by the declarant as true under penalty of perjury and dated, in substantially the following form . . . :'' I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on (date). (Signature)'.'' 47 C.F. R. § 1.16. 18 U.S.C. § 1001 et seq. See also 47 C.F.R. § 1.17. P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. § 552a(e)(3). Federal Communications Commission Federal Communications Commission „Ð`„Ð € û ü ü $ ü Þ ß #yJ #yJ
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-301056A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-301056A1.pdf
  • disclosed in your reply, to determine what, if any, enforcement action is required to ensure compliance. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Douglas G. Miller District Director Atlanta District Office South Central Region Enforcement Bureau cc: WFLI-TV 47 C.F.R. § 1.89. 3 47 U.S.C. § 403 4 47 C.F.R. § 1.89(c) 5 18 U.S.C. § 1001 et seq. See also 47 C.F.R. § 1.17. 6 P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. § 552a(e)(3) Federal Communications Commission Federal Communications Commission `` û ü $ #yJ #yJ
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-301057A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-301057A1.pdf
  • shall be subscribed by the declarant as true under penalty of perjury, and dated, in substantially the following form . . . : `I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on (date). (Signature)'.'' 47 C.F.R. § 1.16. 18 U.S.C. § 1001 et seq. See also 47 C.F.R. § 1.17. P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. § 552a(e)(3). Federal Communications Commission Federal Communications Commission $ : < = < = = #yJ #yJ
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-301059A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-301059A1.pdf
  • shall be subscribed by the declarant as true under penalty of perjury, and dated, in substantially the following form . . . : `I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on (date). (Signature)'.'' 47 C.F.R. § 1.16. 18 U.S.C. § 1001 et seq. See also 47 C.F.R. § 1.17. P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. § 552a(e)(3). Federal Communications Commission Federal Communications Commission % € " # % $ 6 7 Y u • (R) ¯ 6 7 Y u • (R) ¯ 7 Y u • (R) ¯ #yJ #yJ 8 8 8
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-301925A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-301925A1.pdf
  • shall be subscribed by the declarant as true under penalty of perjury, and dated, in substantially the following form . . . : `I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on (date). (Signature)'.'' 47 C.F.R. § 1.16. 18 U.S.C. § 1001 et seq. See also 47 C.F.R. § 1.17. P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. § 552a(e)(3). Federal Communications Commission Federal Communications Commission b Þ Ü Ý Þ $ ½ ¾ à ú ½ ¾ à ú ½ ¾ à ú #yJ #yJ (R) (R) (R)
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-301926A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-301926A1.pdf
  • shall be subscribed by the declarant as true under penalty of perjury, and dated, in substantially the following form . . . : `I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on (date). (Signature)'.'' 47 C.F.R. § 1.16. 18 U.S.C. § 1001 et seq. See also 47 C.F.R. § 1.17. P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. § 552a(e)(3). Federal Communications Commission Federal Communications Commission € [ \ $ ‰ #yJ #yJ
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-301927A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-301927A1.pdf
  • shall be subscribed by the declarant as true under penalty of perjury, and dated, in substantially the following form . . . : `I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on (date). (Signature)'.'' 47 C.F.R. § 1.16. 18 U.S.C. § 1001 et seq. See also 47 C.F.R. § 1.17. P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. § 552a(e)(3). Federal Communications Commission Federal Communications Commission € $ ˜ œ � œ � œ � #yJ #yJ
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-302028A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-302028A1.pdf
  • shall be subscribed by the declarant as true under penalty of perjury, and dated, in substantially the following form . . . : `I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on (date). (Signature)'.'' 47 C.F.R. § 1.16. 18 U.S.C. § 1001 et seq. See also 47 C.F.R. § 1.17. P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. § 552a(e)(3). Federal Communications Commission Federal Communications Commission $ Ç ° # 3 N O § ¨ (c) ª " ¬ ­ (R) ¯ ° # 3 N O § ¨ (c) ª " ¬ ­ (R) ¯ ° l w 3 O #yJ #yJ
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-302030A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-302030A1.pdf
  • shall be subscribed by the declarant as true under penalty of perjury, and dated, in substantially the following form . . . : `I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on (date). (Signature)'.'' 47 C.F.R. § 1.16. 18 U.S.C. § 1001 et seq. See also 47 C.F.R. § 1.17. P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. § 552a(e)(3). Federal Communications Commission Federal Communications Commission € $ #yJ #yJ
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-302451A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-302451A1.pdf
  • reply, to determine what, if any, enforcement action is required to ensure compliance. Any false statement made knowingly and willfully in reply to this Notice is punishable by fine or imprisonment under Title 18 of the U.S. Code. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION James M. Roop District Director Chicago District Office Northeast Region Enforcement Bureau 47 C.F.R. § 1.89. 47 C.F.R. § 1.17. 47 U.S.C. § 308(b). P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. § 552a(e)(3). 18 U.S.C. § 1001 et seq. Federal Communications Commission Federal Communications Commission . / t Á Â € w x $ #yJ #yJ
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-302530A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-302530A1.pdf
  • shall be subscribed by the declarant as true under penalty of perjury, and dated, in substantially the following form . . . : `I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on (date). (Signature)'.'' 47 C.F.R. § 1.16. 18 U.S.C. § 1001 et seq. See also 47 C.F.R. § 1.17. P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. § 552a(e)(3). Federal Communications Commission Federal Communications Commission € $ #yJ #yJ
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-302531A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-302531A1.pdf
  • shall be subscribed by the declarant as true under penalty of perjury, and dated, in substantially the following form . . . : `I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on (date). (Signature)'.'' 47 C.F.R. § 1.16. 18 U.S.C. § 1001 et seq. See also 47 C.F.R. § 1.17. P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. § 552a(e)(3). Federal Communications Commission Federal Communications Commission € $ k o p o p o p #yJ #yJ µ µ µ
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-302781A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-302781A1.pdf
  • cited above and could subject the operator to severe penalties, including, but not limited to, substantial monetary fines, in rem arrest action against the offending radio equipment, and criminal sanctions including imprisonment. (see 47 U.S.C. §§ 401, 501, 503 and 510). UNLICENSED OPERATION OF THIS RADIO STATION MUST CEASE IMMEDIATELY. Pursuant to 47 U.S.C. § 403 and 47 C.F.R. § 1.17, you are directed to respond to the following questions and to provide any requested documentation: If you are the operator of the station, provide evidence that you have authority to operate granted by the FCC. If you are not the operators of the radio station or if there are others involved in the station's operation, provide the name(s) of the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-302946A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-302946A1.pdf
  • shall be subscribed by the declarant as true under penalty of perjury, and dated, in substantially the following form . . . : `I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on (date). (Signature)'.'' 47 C.F.R. § 1.16. 18 U.S.C. § 1001 et seq. See also 47 C.F.R. § 1.17. P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. § 552a(e)(3). Federal Communications Commission Federal Communications Commission € $ #yJ #yJ
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303042A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303042A1.pdf
  • shall be subscribed by the declarant as true under penalty of perjury, and dated, in substantially the following form . . . : `I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on (date). (Signature)'.'' 47 C.F.R. § 1.16. 18 U.S.C. § 1001 et seq. See also 47 C.F.R. § 1.17. P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. § 552a(e)(3). 18 U.S.C. § 1001 et seq. Federal Communications Commission Federal Communications Commission @ A B ‰ Š ‹ Š ‹ ?‹ $ _ ` ‚ ` § È É _ ` ‚ ` § È É ‹ § É #yJ #yJ ¯ ¯ ¯
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303222A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303222A1.pdf
  • shall be subscribed by the declarant as true under penalty of perjury, and dated, in substantially the following form . . . : `I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on (date). (Signature)'.'' 47 C.F.R. § 1.16. 18 U.S.C. § 1001 et seq. See also 47 C.F.R. § 1.17. P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. § 552a(e)(3). Federal Communications Commission Federal Communications Commission ÿ € ÿ $ ÿ # $ #yJ #yJ
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303695A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303695A1.pdf
  • shall be subscribed by the declarant as true under penalty of perjury, and dated, in substantially the following form . . . : `I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on (date). (Signature)'.'' 47 C.F.R. § 1.16. 18 U.S.C. § 1001 et seq. See also 47 C.F.R. § 1.17. P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. § 552a(e)(3). Federal Communications Commission Federal Communications Commission € $ h P Q P Q P #yJ #yJ
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303811A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303811A1.pdf
  • shall be subscribed by the declarant as true under penalty of perjury, and dated, in substantially the following form . . . : `I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on (date). (Signature)'.'' 47 C.F.R. § 1.16. 18 U.S.C. § 1001 et seq. See also 47 C.F.R. § 1.17. P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. § 552a(e)(3). Federal Communications Commission Federal Communications Commission $ × Ù Ú Ù Ú Ù Ú s y #yJ #yJ
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303812A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303812A1.pdf
  • shall be subscribed by the declarant as true under penalty of perjury, and dated, in substantially the following form . . . : `I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on (date). (Signature)'.'' 47 C.F.R. § 1.16. 18 U.S.C. § 1001 et seq. See also 47 C.F.R. § 1.17. P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. § 552a(e)(3). Federal Communications Commission Federal Communications Commission $ 3 B i „ ... 3 B i „ ... 3 B i „ ... ¾ ¿ Õ Ø #yJ #yJ % % %
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303813A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303813A1.pdf
  • shall be subscribed by the declarant as true under penalty of perjury, and dated, in substantially the following form . . . : `I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on (date). (Signature)'.'' 47 C.F.R. § 1.16. 18 U.S.C. § 1001 et seq. See also 47 C.F.R. § 1.17. P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. § 552a(e)(3). 18 U.S.C. § 1001 et seq. Federal Communications Commission Federal Communications Commission $ Ä È É È É É É #yJ #yJ
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303886A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303886A1.txt
  • 7.1 Consumer Price Indices - Levels - Telephone Components ............................ Chart 7.3 Consumer Price Indices - Monthly ......................................................................... Table 7.4 Contribution Base Revenues by Program - 2008........................................ Table 1.4 Customer Perception Surveys - Percentage of Customers Dissatisfied - 2009..........Table 9.4 Customer Perception Surveys - Sample Sizes - 2009 ............................................... Table 9.5 Data Used to Allocate Nationwide Revenue to States................................. Table 1.17 Embedded High-Cost Loop Fund Formulas ......................................................... Table 3.3 High-Cost Loop Support Payments by State or Jurisdiction............................. Table 3.6 High-Cost Loop Support Payments by Study Area ......................................... Table 3.22 High-Cost Model Support Payments by State or Jurisdiction ........................... Table 3.9 High-Cost Model Support Payments by Study Area ...................................... Table 3.25 High-Cost Support Fund Payment History ............................................................ Table 3.1 High-Cost Support Fund
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303886A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303886A2.txt
  • 7.1 Consumer Price Indices - Levels - Telephone Components ............................ Chart 7.3 Consumer Price Indices - Monthly ......................................................................... Table 7.4 Contribution Base Revenues by Program - 2008........................................ Table 1.4 Customer Perception Surveys - Percentage of Customers Dissatisfied - 2009..........Table 9.4 Customer Perception Surveys - Sample Sizes - 2009 ............................................... Table 9.5 Data Used to Allocate Nationwide Revenue to States................................. Table 1.17 Embedded High-Cost Loop Fund Formulas ......................................................... Table 3.3 High-Cost Loop Support Payments by State or Jurisdiction............................. Table 3.6 High-Cost Loop Support Payments by Study Area ......................................... Table 3.22 High-Cost Model Support Payments by State or Jurisdiction ........................... Table 3.9 High-Cost Model Support Payments by Study Area ...................................... Table 3.25 High-Cost Support Fund Payment History ............................................................ Table 3.1 High-Cost Support Fund
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303886A3.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303886A3.txt
  • state-by-state basis interstate ILEC revenues. Interstate toll carrier revenues are estimated using data from the National Exchange Carrier Association (NECA) minutes of use data. Table 1.15 shows intrastate end-user telecommunications revenues by category for ILECs, CLECs and interconnected VoIP providers, payphone providers, wireless carriers, and toll carriers. Similarly, components of interstate end-user telecommunications revenues are presented in Table 1.16. Table 1.17 provides most of the underlying data that are used to allocate nationwide revenues to the individual states. We also report each state's percentage of the nationwide total. We use this percentage to allocate nationwide revenue data in Table 1.14 to individual states in Tables 1.15 and 1.16. These data include ILEC end-user switched access lines, non-ILEC end-user switched access 24
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303886A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303886A5.txt
  • CO, LLC -15.77 -12.69 -3.53 0.00 220338 C QUINCY TEL CO-GA DIV 0.89 -10.56 12.80 36.66 220344 C ALMA TEL CO -18.72 -6.24 -13.31 0.00 220346 C BLUE RIDGE TEL CO -3.02 -6.13 3.32 -14.76 220347 C BRANTLEY TEL CO 30.75 -7.49 41.34 99.87 220348 C BULLOCH COUNTY RURAL -8.07 -4.24 -4.00 -40.41 220351 C CAMDEN TEL & TEL CO -1.17 -7.83 7.22 0.00 220354 C CHICKAMAUGA TEL CORP 14.88 -5.50 21.56 INFINITE 220355 C CITIZENS TEL CO - GA -7.20 -7.96 0.82 -63.67 220356 C COASTAL UTILITIES -7.34 -8.92 1.73 0.00 220357 C WINDSTREAM GA -9.06 -3.18 -6.07 -100.00 220358 C DARIEN TEL CO 9.10 -9.09 20.01 19.46 220360 C ELLIJAY TEL CO 0.11 -7.71 8.46 0.82 220362 C FRONTIER-FAIRMOUNT
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303989A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303989A1.pdf
  • shall be subscribed by the declarant as true under penalty of perjury, and dated, in substantially the following form . . . : `I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on (date). (Signature)'.'' 47 C.F.R. § 1.16. 18 U.S.C. § 1001 et seq. See also 47 C.F.R. § 1.17. P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. § 552a(e)(3). Federal Communications Commission Federal Communications Commission € $ €X €X €X €X €X €X €X €X €X = > #yJ #yJ
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-304202A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-304202A1.pdf
  • shall be subscribed by the declarant as true under penalty of perjury, and dated, in substantially the following form . . . : `I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on (date). (Signature)'.'' 47 C.F.R. § 1.16. 18 U.S.C. § 1001 et seq. See also 47 C.F.R. § 1.17. P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. § 552a(e)(3). 18 U.S.C. § 1001 et seq. Federal Communications Commission Federal Communications Commission €€ Â Ã $ L N O N O #yJ #yJ
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-304628A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-304628A1.pdf
  • shall be subscribed by the declarant as true under penalty of perjury, and dated, in substantially the following form . . . : `I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on (date). (Signature)'.'' 47 C.F.R. § 1.16. 18 U.S.C. § 1001 et seq. See also 47 C.F.R. § 1.17. P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. § 552a(e)(3). Federal Communications Commission Federal Communications Commission $ w ` W X Y Z [ \ ] ^ _ ` W X Y Z [ \ ] ^ _ ` #yJ #yJ
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-305116A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-305116A1.pdf
  • shall be subscribed by the declarant as true under penalty of perjury, and dated, in substantially the following form . . . : `I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on (date). (Signature)'.'' 47 C.F.R. § 1.16. 18 U.S.C. § 1001 et seq. See also 47 C.F.R. § 1.17. P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. § 552a(e)(3). Federal Communications Commission Federal Communications Commission í î $ #yJ #yJ
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-305159A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-305159A1.pdf
  • shall be subscribed by the declarant as true under penalty of perjury, and dated, in substantially the following form . . . : `I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on (date). (Signature)'.'' 47 C.F.R. § 1.16. 18 U.S.C. § 1001 et seq. See also 47 C.F.R. § 1.17. P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. § 552a(e)(3). Federal Communications Commission Federal Communications Commission € N Q $ ß à #yJ #yJ
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-305160A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-305160A1.pdf
  • shall be subscribed by the declarant as true under penalty of perjury, and dated, in substantially the following form . . . : `I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on (date). (Signature)'.'' 47 C.F.R. § 1.16. 18 U.S.C. § 1001 et seq. See also 47 C.F.R. § 1.17. P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. § 552a(e)(3). Federal Communications Commission Federal Communications Commission € O R $ á â #yJ #yJ
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-305410A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-305410A1.pdf
  • shall be subscribed by the declarant as true under penalty of perjury, and dated, in substantially the following form . . . : `I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on (date). (Signature)'.'' 47 C.F.R. § 1.16. 18 U.S.C. § 1001 et seq. See also 47 C.F.R. § 1.17. P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. § 552a(e)(3). 18 U.S.C. § 1001 et seq. Federal Communications Commission Federal Communications Commission > ? K €€ > ? $ #yJ #yJ
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-306449A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-306449A1.pdf
  • shall be subscribed by the declarant as true under penalty of perjury, and dated, in substantially the following form . . . : `I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on (date). (Signature)'.'' 47 C.F.R. § 1.16. 18 U.S.C. § 1001 et seq. See also 47 C.F.R. § 1.17. P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. § 552a(e)(3). 18 U.S.C. § 1001 et seq. Federal Communications Commission Federal Communications Commission ¢ €€ $ 0 #yJ #yJ
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-306474A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-306474A1.pdf
  • shall be subscribed by the declarant as true under penalty of perjury, and dated, in substantially the following form . . . : `I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on (date). (Signature)'.'' 47 C.F.R. § 1.16. 18 U.S.C. § 1001 et seq. See also 47 C.F.R. § 1.17. P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. § 552a(e)(3). Federal Communications Commission Federal Communications Commission € $ Ž w # $ r s t u v w # $ r s t u v w $ #yJ #yJ
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-306901A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-306901A1.pdf
  • shall be subscribed by the declarant as true under penalty of perjury, and dated, in substantially the following form . . . : `I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on (date). (Signature)'.'' 47 C.F.R. § 1.16. 18 U.S.C. § 1001 et seq. See also 47 C.F.R. § 1.17. P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. § 552a(e)(3). Federal Communications Commission Federal Communications Commission ) L - $ - tm š tm š 3 9 #yJ #yJ @
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-307477A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-307477A1.pdf
  • shall be subscribed by the declarant as true under penalty of perjury, and dated, in substantially the following form . . . : `I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on (date). (Signature)'.'' 47 C.F.R. § 1.16. 18 U.S.C. § 1001 et seq. See also 47 C.F.R. § 1.17. P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. § 552a(e)(3). Federal Communications Commission Federal Communications Commission $ c e f e f #yJ #yJ
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-307999A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-307999A1.pdf
  • shall be subscribed by the declarant as true under penalty of perjury, and dated, in substantially the following form . . . : `I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on (date). (Signature)'.'' 47 C.F.R. § 1.16. 18 U.S.C. § 1001 et seq. See also 47 C.F.R. § 1.17. P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. § 552a(e)(3). Federal Communications Commission Federal Communications Commission € £ $ ¶ ¾ #yJ #yJ
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-308322A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-308322A1.pdf
  • shall be subscribed by the declarant as true under penalty of perjury, and dated, in substantially the following form . . . : `I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on (date). (Signature)'.'' 47 C.F.R. § 1.16. 18 U.S.C. § 1001 et seq. See also 47 C.F.R. § 1.17. P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. § 552a(e)(3). Federal Communications Commission Federal Communications Commission $ #yJ #yJ
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-308323A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-308323A1.pdf
  • shall be subscribed by the declarant as true under penalty of perjury, and dated, in substantially the following form . . . : `I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on (date). (Signature)'.'' 47 C.F.R. § 1.16. 18 U.S.C. § 1001 et seq. See also 47 C.F.R. § 1.17. P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. § 552a(e)(3). Federal Communications Commission Federal Communications Commission $ ¼ ¥ & G H I ¡ ¢ £ ¤ ¥ & G H I ¡ ¢ £ ¤ ¥ & I #yJ #yJ
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-308324A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-308324A1.pdf
  • shall be subscribed by the declarant as true under penalty of perjury, and dated, in substantially the following form . . . : `I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on (date). (Signature)'.'' 47 C.F.R. § 1.16. 18 U.S.C. § 1001 et seq. See also 47 C.F.R. § 1.17. P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. § 552a(e)(3). Federal Communications Commission Federal Communications Commission $ " % F G H Ÿ ¡ ¢ £ ¤ % F G H Ÿ ¡ ¢ £ ¤ % H #yJ #yJ
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-308325A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-308325A1.pdf
  • shall be subscribed by the declarant as true under penalty of perjury, and dated, in substantially the following form . . . : `I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on (date). (Signature)'.'' 47 C.F.R. § 1.16. 18 U.S.C. § 1001 et seq. See also 47 C.F.R. § 1.17. P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. § 552a(e)(3). Federal Communications Commission Federal Communications Commission $ Â " , M N O ¦ § ¨ (c) ª " , M N O ¦ § ¨ (c) ª " , O #yJ #yJ
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-308326A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-308326A1.pdf
  • shall be subscribed by the declarant as true under penalty of perjury, and dated, in substantially the following form . . . : `I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on (date). (Signature)'.'' 47 C.F.R. § 1.16. 18 U.S.C. § 1001 et seq. See also 47 C.F.R. § 1.17. P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. § 552a(e)(3). Federal Communications Commission Federal Communications Commission $ " ) J K L £ ¤ ) J K L £ ¤ ) L #yJ #yJ r
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-308421A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-308421A1.pdf
  • shall be subscribed by the declarant as true under penalty of perjury, and dated, in substantially the following form . . . : `I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on (date). (Signature)'.'' 47 C.F.R. § 1.16. 18 U.S.C. § 1001 et seq. See also 47 C.F.R. § 1.17. P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. § 552a(e)(3). Federal Communications Commission Federal Communications Commission Ý ß $ #yJ #yJ
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-308425A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-308425A1.pdf
  • shall be subscribed by the declarant as true under penalty of perjury, and dated, in substantially the following form . . . : `I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on (date). (Signature)'.'' 47 C.F.R. § 1.16. 18 U.S.C. § 1001 et seq. See also 47 C.F.R. § 1.17. P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. § 552a(e)(3). Federal Communications Commission Federal Communications Commission Ý ß $ #yJ #yJ
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-308426A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-308426A1.pdf
  • shall be subscribed by the declarant as true under penalty of perjury, and dated, in substantially the following form . . . : `I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on (date). (Signature)'.'' 47 C.F.R. § 1.16. 18 U.S.C. § 1001 et seq. See also 47 C.F.R. § 1.17. P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. § 552a(e)(3). Federal Communications Commission Federal Communications Commission è ê $ #yJ #yJ
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-308427A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-308427A1.pdf
  • shall be subscribed by the declarant as true under penalty of perjury, and dated, in substantially the following form . . . : `I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on (date). (Signature)'.'' 47 C.F.R. § 1.16. 18 U.S.C. § 1001 et seq. See also 47 C.F.R. § 1.17. P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. § 552a(e)(3). Federal Communications Commission Federal Communications Commission ì î $ #yJ #yJ
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-308940A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-308940A1.pdf
  • shall be subscribed by the declarant as true under penalty of perjury, and dated, in substantially the following form . . . : `I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on (date). (Signature)'.'' 47 C.F.R. § 1.16. 18 U.S.C. § 1001 et seq. See also 47 C.F.R. § 1.17. P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. § 552a(e)(3). 18 U.S.C. § 1001 et seq. Federal Communications Commission Federal Communications Commission €€ $ #yJ #yJ €ì
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-308942A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-308942A1.pdf
  • shall be subscribed by the declarant as true under penalty of perjury, and dated, in substantially the following form . . . : `I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on (date). (Signature)'.'' 47 C.F.R. § 1.16. 18 U.S.C. § 1001 et seq. See also 47 C.F.R. § 1.17. P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. § 552a(e)(3). Federal Communications Commission Federal Communications Commission € $ • 6 7 Y i y ñ ò 6 7 Y i y '' ñ ò · ¸ Ä Å Ç È Î Ð Ó Ö Ø Ù õ ö ý þ y '' #yJ #yJ
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-309208A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-309208A1.pdf
  • shall be subscribed by the declarant as true under penalty of perjury, and dated, in substantially the following form . . . : `I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on (date). (Signature)'.'' 47 C.F.R. § 1.16. 18 U.S.C. § 1001 et seq. See also 47 C.F.R. § 1.17. P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. § 552a(e)(3). Federal Communications Commission Federal Communications Commission € ‚ „ $ Ê #yJ #yJ
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-309310A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-309310A1.pdf
  • shall be subscribed by the declarant as true under penalty of perjury, and dated, in substantially the following form . . . : `I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on (date). (Signature)'.'' 47 C.F.R. § 1.16. 18 U.S.C. § 1001 et seq. See also 47 C.F.R. § 1.17. P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. § 552a(e)(3). Federal Communications Commission Federal Communications Commission ¨ (c) $ g h Œ ¢ Ê æ g h Œ ¢ Ê æ g h Œ ¢ Ê æ #yJ #yJ k k k
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-309449A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-309449A1.pdf
  • shall be subscribed by the declarant as true under penalty of perjury, and dated, in substantially the following form . . . : `I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on (date). (Signature)'.'' 47 C.F.R. § 1.16. 18 U.S.C. § 1001 et seq. See also 47 C.F.R. § 1.17. P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. § 552a(e)(3). Federal Communications Commission Federal Communications Commission $ - #yJ #yJ
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-309786A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-309786A1.pdf
  • shall be subscribed by the declarant as true under penalty of perjury, and dated, in substantially the following form . . . : `I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on (date). (Signature)'.'' 47 C.F.R. § 1.16. 18 U.S.C. § 1001 et seq. See also 47 C.F.R. § 1.17. P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. § 552a(e)(3). Federal Communications Commission Federal Communications Commission $ (R) ´ #yJ #yJ
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-309787A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-309787A1.pdf
  • shall be subscribed by the declarant as true under penalty of perjury, and dated, in substantially the following form . . . : `I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on (date). (Signature)'.'' 47 C.F.R. § 1.16. 18 U.S.C. § 1001 et seq. See also 47 C.F.R. § 1.17. P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. § 552a(e)(3). Federal Communications Commission Federal Communications Commission Y W Y € Y $ Ò s t - ¦ ¶ s t - ¦ ¶ Ñ s t - ¦ ¶ Ñ Y ¶ Ñ #yJ #yJ = = =
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-309788A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-309788A1.pdf
  • shall be subscribed by the declarant as true under penalty of perjury, and dated, in substantially the following form . . . : `I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on (date). (Signature)'.'' 47 C.F.R. § 1.16. 18 U.S.C. § 1001 et seq. See also 47 C.F.R. § 1.17. P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. § 552a(e)(3). Federal Communications Commission Federal Communications Commission ô õ ô õ õ $ X \ ] \ ] \ ] õ #yJ #yJ µ µ µ
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-309789A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-309789A1.pdf
  • shall be subscribed by the declarant as true under penalty of perjury, and dated, in substantially the following form . . . : `I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on (date). (Signature)'.'' 47 C.F.R. § 1.16. 18 U.S.C. § 1001 et seq. See also 47 C.F.R. § 1.17. P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. § 552a(e)(3). Federal Communications Commission Federal Communications Commission ì í ì í í $ P T U ø ù T U ø ù T U ø í #yJ #yJ (R) (R) (R)
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-309790A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-309790A1.pdf
  • shall be subscribed by the declarant as true under penalty of perjury, and dated, in substantially the following form . . . : `I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on (date). (Signature)'.'' 47 C.F.R. § 1.16. 18 U.S.C. § 1001 et seq. See also 47 C.F.R. § 1.17. P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. § 552a(e)(3). Federal Communications Commission Federal Communications Commission û ü ý û ü ü ý $ ` d e d e d e ü #yJ #yJ ¾ ¾ ¾
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-309791A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-309791A1.pdf
  • shall be subscribed by the declarant as true under penalty of perjury, and dated, in substantially the following form . . . : `I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on (date). (Signature)'.'' 47 C.F.R. § 1.16. 18 U.S.C. § 1001 et seq. See also 47 C.F.R. § 1.17. P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. § 552a(e)(3). Federal Communications Commission Federal Communications Commission í î ï í î î ï $ R V W ú û V W ú û V W ú î #yJ #yJ ° ° °
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-309794A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-309794A1.pdf
  • shall be subscribed by the declarant as true under penalty of perjury, and dated, in substantially the following form . . . : `I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on (date). (Signature)'.'' 47 C.F.R. § 1.16. 18 U.S.C. § 1001 et seq. See also 47 C.F.R. § 1.17. P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. § 552a(e)(3). Federal Communications Commission Federal Communications Commission € Ö Ù $ ÷ " ° #yJ #yJ
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-309795A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-309795A1.pdf
  • shall be subscribed by the declarant as true under penalty of perjury, and dated, in substantially the following form . . . : `I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on (date). (Signature)'.'' 47 C.F.R. § 1.16. 18 U.S.C. § 1001 et seq. See also 47 C.F.R. § 1.17. P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. § 552a(e)(3). Federal Communications Commission Federal Communications Commission € › ž $ Š #yJ #yJ
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-309796A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-309796A1.pdf
  • shall be subscribed by the declarant as true under penalty of perjury, and dated, in substantially the following form . . . : `I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on (date). (Signature)'.'' 47 C.F.R. § 1.16. 18 U.S.C. § 1001 et seq. See also 47 C.F.R. § 1.17. P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. § 552a(e)(3). Federal Communications Commission Federal Communications Commission € · º $ ì #yJ #yJ
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-309797A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-309797A1.pdf
  • shall be subscribed by the declarant as true under penalty of perjury, and dated, in substantially the following form . . . : `I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on (date). (Signature)'.'' 47 C.F.R. § 1.16. 18 U.S.C. § 1001 et seq. See also 47 C.F.R. § 1.17. P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. § 552a(e)(3). Federal Communications Commission Federal Communications Commission € Ã Æ $ ü #yJ #yJ
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-309798A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-309798A1.pdf
  • shall be subscribed by the declarant as true under penalty of perjury, and dated, in substantially the following form . . . : `I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on (date). (Signature)'.'' 47 C.F.R. § 1.16. 18 U.S.C. § 1001 et seq. See also 47 C.F.R. § 1.17. P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. § 552a(e)(3). Federal Communications Commission Federal Communications Commission € µ ¸ $ ½ p v #yJ #yJ
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-309799A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-309799A1.pdf
  • shall be subscribed by the declarant as true under penalty of perjury, and dated, in substantially the following form . . . : `I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on (date). (Signature)'.'' 47 C.F.R. § 1.16. 18 U.S.C. § 1001 et seq. See also 47 C.F.R. § 1.17. P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. § 552a(e)(3). Federal Communications Commission Federal Communications Commission € ¼ ¿ $ ê [ ^ ž £ #yJ #yJ
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-309803A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-309803A1.pdf
  • shall be subscribed by the declarant as true under penalty of perjury, and dated, in substantially the following form . . . : `I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on (date). (Signature)'.'' 47 C.F.R. § 1.16. 18 U.S.C. § 1001 et seq. See also 47 C.F.R. § 1.17. P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. § 552a(e)(3). Federal Communications Commission Federal Communications Commission € $ ­ C ' • - ' B • - ' B #yJ #yJ
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-309811A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-309811A1.pdf
  • shall be subscribed by the declarant as true under penalty of perjury, and dated, in substantially the following form . . . : `I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on (date). (Signature)'.'' 47 C.F.R. § 1.16. 18 U.S.C. § 1001 et seq. See also 47 C.F.R. § 1.17. P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. § 552a(e)(3). Federal Communications Commission Federal Communications Commission € $ ± š ! 5 6 ` ' `` '' • - - ˜ tm š ! 5 6 ` ' `` '' • - - ˜ tm š ! 5 6 ` š #yJ #yJ
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-310098A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-310098A1.pdf
  • shall be subscribed by the declarant as true under penalty of perjury, and dated, in substantially the following form . . . : `I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on (date). (Signature)'.'' 47 C.F.R. § 1.16. 18 U.S.C. § 1001 et seq. See also 47 C.F.R. § 1.17. P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. § 552a(e)(3). Federal Communications Commission Federal Communications Commission Õ Ö € $ Ë Ï Ð Ï Ð Ï Ð #yJ #yJ
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-310099A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-310099A1.pdf
  • shall be subscribed by the declarant as true under penalty of perjury, and dated, in substantially the following form . . . : `I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on (date). (Signature)'.'' 47 C.F.R. § 1.16. 18 U.S.C. § 1001 et seq. See also 47 C.F.R. § 1.17. P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. § 552a(e)(3). Federal Communications Commission Federal Communications Commission Å Æ $ " ¿ À ¿ À #yJ #yJ
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-310100A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-310100A1.pdf
  • shall be subscribed by the declarant as true under penalty of perjury, and dated, in substantially the following form . . . : `I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on (date). (Signature)'.'' 47 C.F.R. § 1.16. 18 U.S.C. § 1001 et seq. See also 47 C.F.R. § 1.17. P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. § 552a(e)(3). Federal Communications Commission Federal Communications Commission $ ! ! ! #yJ #yJ
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-310101A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-310101A1.pdf
  • shall be subscribed by the declarant as true under penalty of perjury, and dated, in substantially the following form . . . : `I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on (date). (Signature)'.'' 47 C.F.R. § 1.16. 18 U.S.C. § 1001 et seq. See also 47 C.F.R. § 1.17. P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. § 552a(e)(3). Federal Communications Commission Federal Communications Commission $ ) - . - . - . #yJ #yJ
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-310311A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-310311A1.pdf
  • shall be subscribed by the declarant as true under penalty of perjury, and dated, in substantially the following form . . . : `I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on (date). (Signature)'.'' 47 C.F.R. § 1.16. 18 U.S.C. § 1001 et seq. See also 47 C.F.R. § 1.17. P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. § 552a(e)(3). Federal Communications Commission Federal Communications Commission 2 0 2 € 2 $ D E g w ‡ D E g w ‡ ¢ ø ù D E g w ‡ ¢ ø 2 À Å ‡ ¢ #yJ #yJ
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-310312A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-310312A1.pdf
  • shall be subscribed by the declarant as true under penalty of perjury, and dated, in substantially the following form . . . : `I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on (date). (Signature)'.'' 47 C.F.R. § 1.16. 18 U.S.C. § 1001 et seq. See also 47 C.F.R. § 1.17. P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. § 552a(e)(3). Federal Communications Commission Federal Communications Commission € $ ~ - f g f g f ; B #yJ #yJ
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-310313A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-310313A1.pdf
  • shall be subscribed by the declarant as true under penalty of perjury, and dated, in substantially the following form . . . : `I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on (date). (Signature)'.'' 47 C.F.R. § 1.16. 18 U.S.C. § 1001 et seq. See also 47 C.F.R. § 1.17. P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. § 552a(e)(3). Federal Communications Commission Federal Communications Commission € $ ¥ 8 � Ž 7 � Ž 7 � Z [ d e l m p r t u 7 #yJ #yJ
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-310620A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-310620A1.pdf
  • shall be subscribed by the declarant as true under penalty of perjury, and dated, in substantially the following form . . . : `I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on (date). (Signature)'.'' 47 C.F.R. § 1.16. 18 U.S.C. § 1001 et seq. See also 47 C.F.R. § 1.17. P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. § 552a(e)(3). Federal Communications Commission Federal Communications Commission $ à #yJ #yJ ¦Ü ðî@Ë
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-310731A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-310731A1.pdf
  • shall be subscribed by the declarant as true under penalty of perjury, and dated, in substantially the following form . . . : `I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on (date). (Signature)'.'' 47 C.F.R. § 1.16. 18 U.S.C. § 1001 et seq. See also 47 C.F.R. § 1.17. P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. § 552a(e)(3). Federal Communications Commission Federal Communications Commission 5 ð ô 5 7 $ i k l k l 0 0 0 #yJ #yJ
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-310868A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-310868A1.pdf
  • shall be subscribed by the declarant as true under penalty of perjury, and dated, in substantially the following form . . . : `I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on (date). (Signature)'.'' 47 C.F.R. § 1.16. 18 U.S.C. § 1001 et seq. See also 47 C.F.R. § 1.17. P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. § 552a(e)(3). Federal Communications Commission Federal Communications Commission € ´ · $ Ô ˆ � #yJ #yJ
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-310869A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-310869A1.pdf
  • shall be subscribed by the declarant as true under penalty of perjury, and dated, in substantially the following form . . . : `I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on (date). (Signature)'.'' 47 C.F.R. § 1.16. 18 U.S.C. § 1001 et seq. See also 47 C.F.R. § 1.17. P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. § 552a(e)(3). Federal Communications Commission Federal Communications Commission € $ #yJ #yJ
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-310870A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-310870A1.pdf
  • shall be subscribed by the declarant as true under penalty of perjury, and dated, in substantially the following form . . . : `I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on (date). (Signature)'.'' 47 C.F.R. § 1.16. 18 U.S.C. § 1001 et seq. See also 47 C.F.R. § 1.17. P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. § 552a(e)(3). Federal Communications Commission Federal Communications Commission € $ æ ç æ ç æ ç T U f #yJ #yJ
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-310970A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-310970A1.pdf
  • shall be subscribed by the declarant as true under penalty of perjury, and dated, in substantially the following form . . . : `I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on (date). (Signature)'.'' 47 C.F.R. § 1.16. 18 U.S.C. § 1001 et seq. See also 47 C.F.R. § 1.17. P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. § 552a(e)(3). Federal Communications Commission Federal Communications Commission ... † € ... † $ ¨ � ! 4 5 ` ! 4 5 � ` ! 4 5 � ` #yJ #yJ
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-311568A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-311568A1.pdf
  • shall be subscribed by the declarant as true under penalty of perjury, and dated, in substantially the following form . . . : `I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on (date). (Signature)'.'' 47 C.F.R. § 1.16. 18 U.S.C. § 1001 et seq. See also 47 C.F.R. § 1.17. P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. § 552a(e)(3). Federal Communications Commission Federal Communications Commission € ç é ê $ ¨ (c) Ë â ¨ (c) Ë â ¨ (c) Ë â #yJ #yJ } } }
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-311569A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-311569A1.pdf
  • shall be subscribed by the declarant as true under penalty of perjury, and dated, in substantially the following form . . . : `I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on (date). (Signature)'.'' 47 C.F.R. § 1.16. 18 U.S.C. § 1001 et seq. See also 47 C.F.R. § 1.17. P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. § 552a(e)(3). Federal Communications Commission Federal Communications Commission € × Ù $ É Ï #yJ #yJ
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-311695A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-311695A1.pdf
  • shall be subscribed by the declarant as true under penalty of perjury, and dated, in substantially the following form . . . : `I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on (date). (Signature)'.'' 47 C.F.R. § 1.16. 18 U.S.C. § 1001 et seq. See also 47 C.F.R. § 1.17. P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. § 552a(e)(3). Federal Communications Commission Federal Communications Commission $ ¨ (c) ¨ (c) #yJ #yJ Ÿ]ú
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-311702A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-311702A1.pdf
  • shall be subscribed by the declarant as true under penalty of perjury, and dated, in substantially the following form . . . : `I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on (date). (Signature)'.'' 47 C.F.R. § 1.16. 18 U.S.C. § 1001 et seq. See also 47 C.F.R. § 1.17. P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. § 552a(e)(3). Federal Communications Commission Federal Communications Commission ¨ (c) € $ L P Q ô õ P Q ô õ P Q ô õ #yJ #yJ š š š
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-311703A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-311703A1.pdf
  • shall be subscribed by the declarant as true under penalty of perjury, and dated, in substantially the following form . . . : `I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on (date). (Signature)'.'' 47 C.F.R. § 1.16. 18 U.S.C. § 1001 et seq. See also 47 C.F.R. § 1.17. P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. § 552a(e)(3). Federal Communications Commission Federal Communications Commission ² ³ € ° $ > B C æ ç B C æ ç B C æ ç #yJ #yJ ... ... ...
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-311710A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-311710A1.pdf
  • shall be subscribed by the declarant as true under penalty of perjury, and dated, in substantially the following form . . . : `I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on (date). (Signature)'.'' 47 C.F.R. § 1.16. 18 U.S.C. § 1001 et seq. See also 47 C.F.R. § 1.17. P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. § 552a(e)(3). Federal Communications Commission Federal Communications Commission € $ 2 4 #yJ #yJ
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-311713A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-311713A1.pdf
  • shall be subscribed by the declarant as true under penalty of perjury, and dated, in substantially the following form . . . : `I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on (date). (Signature)'.'' 47 C.F.R. § 1.16. 18 U.S.C. § 1001 et seq. See also 47 C.F.R. § 1.17. P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. § 552a(e)(3). Federal Communications Commission Federal Communications Commission ‹ õ ÷ ø þ è é $ ) s Ð Ñ ) s Ð Ñ ) s Ð Ñ ( ë î ; < s Ñ #yJ #yJ
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-311714A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-311714A1.pdf
  • shall be subscribed by the declarant as true under penalty of perjury, and dated, in substantially the following form . . . : `I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on (date). (Signature)'.'' 47 C.F.R. § 1.16. 18 U.S.C. § 1001 et seq. See also 47 C.F.R. § 1.17. P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. § 552a(e)(3). Federal Communications Commission Federal Communications Commission $ 2 6 7 6 7 6 7 „ „ #yJ #yJ
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-311715A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-311715A1.pdf
  • shall be subscribed by the declarant as true under penalty of perjury, and dated, in substantially the following form . . . : `I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on (date). (Signature)'.'' 47 C.F.R. § 1.16. 18 U.S.C. § 1001 et seq. See also 47 C.F.R. § 1.17. P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. § 552a(e)(3). Federal Communications Commission Federal Communications Commission € $ 1 2 6 1 2 6 2 0 1 2 2 ¾ Ê #yJ #yJ ¸¤üFÞÚüFº¤üF
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-311775A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-311775A1.txt
  • $3.50 $1.75$10.00$13.50 $8.34 $3.49 $1.74$10.09$13.58 $8.33 $3.49 $1.75$10.07$13.56 Alaska 8.25 3.50 1.75 10.00 13.50 8.25 3.46 1.73 9.98 13.43 8.25 3.46 1.73 9.98 13.45 American Samoa 8.25 0.00 0.00 8.25 8.25 8.25 3.50 1.75 10.00 13.50 8.25 0.04 0.02 8.27 8.31 Arizona 8.01 1.22 0.61 8.62 9.84 8.25 3.50 1.75 10.00 13.50 8.14 2.42 1.21 9.34 11.76 Arkansas 7.42 2.34 1.17 8.59 10.93 7.09 3.49 1.74 8.84 12.33 7.16 3.24 1.62 8.78 12.03 California 6.60 3.42 1.71 8.31 11.74 8.03 3.50 1.75 9.78 13.28 6.61 3.43 1.71 8.32 11.75 Colorado 8.21 3.49 1.75 9.96 13.46 8.25 3.50 1.75 10.00 13.50 8.21 3.49 1.75 9.96 13.46 Connecticut 7.48 1.18 0.59 8.07 9.25 7.48 3.50 1.75 9.23 12.73 7.48 2.55 1.28 8.76 11.31
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-312032A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-312032A1.pdf
  • shall be subscribed by the declarant as true under penalty of perjury, and dated, in substantially the following form . . . : `I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on (date). (Signature)'.'' 47 C.F.R. § 1.16. 18 U.S.C. § 1001 et seq. See also 47 C.F.R. § 1.17. P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. § 552a(e)(3). Federal Communications Commission Federal Communications Commission € `„Ð $ 1 H ] p 1 H ] p ƒ „ - - ­ (R) 1 ' o p è ê 0 o p q ‚ ... • ˜ ¬ - 0 1 H \ ] o p - ' p #yJ #yJ I I I
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-312033A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-312033A1.pdf
  • shall be subscribed by the declarant as true under penalty of perjury, and dated, in substantially the following form . . . : `I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on (date). (Signature)'.'' 47 C.F.R. § 1.16. 18 U.S.C. § 1001 et seq. See also 47 C.F.R. § 1.17. P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. § 552a(e)(3). Federal Communications Commission Federal Communications Commission € `„Ð $ 5 6 7 G Y p ... ˜ 5 6 7 G Y p ... ˜ " ¬ ¾ ¿ Õ Ö 5 6 7 Y 7 < - ˜ 7 @ - ˜ tm ª ­ ½ À Ô 6 7 ? Y p
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-312038A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-312038A1.pdf
  • shall be subscribed by the declarant as true under penalty of perjury, and dated, in substantially the following form . . . : `I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on (date). (Signature)'.'' 47 C.F.R. § 1.16. 18 U.S.C. § 1001 et seq. See also 47 C.F.R. § 1.17. P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. § 552a(e)(3). Federal Communications Commission Federal Communications Commission € $ S W X û ü W X û ü #yJ #yJ À À À
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-312039A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-312039A1.pdf
  • shall be subscribed by the declarant as true under penalty of perjury, and dated, in substantially the following form . . . : `I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on (date). (Signature)'.'' 47 C.F.R. § 1.16. 18 U.S.C. § 1001 et seq. See also 47 C.F.R. § 1.17. P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. § 552a(e)(3). Federal Communications Commission Federal Communications Commission € $ o s t s t s t #yJ #yJ Ü Ü Ü
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-312040A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-312040A1.pdf
  • shall be subscribed by the declarant as true under penalty of perjury, and dated, in substantially the following form . . . : `I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on (date). (Signature)'.'' 47 C.F.R. § 1.16. 18 U.S.C. § 1001 et seq. See also 47 C.F.R. § 1.17. P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. § 552a(e)(3). Federal Communications Commission Federal Communications Commission € æ ç ç è $ X \ ] \ ] \ ] ç #yJ #yJ ¸ ¸ ¸
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-312041A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-312041A1.pdf
  • shall be subscribed by the declarant as true under penalty of perjury, and dated, in substantially the following form . . . : `I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on (date). (Signature)'.'' 47 C.F.R. § 1.16. 18 U.S.C. § 1001 et seq. See also 47 C.F.R. § 1.17. P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. § 552a(e)(3). Federal Communications Commission Federal Communications Commission € ä å å æ $ V Z [ þ ÿ Z [ þ ÿ Z [ þ ÿ å #yJ #yJ ¶ ¶ ¶
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-312042A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-312042A1.pdf
  • shall be subscribed by the declarant as true under penalty of perjury, and dated, in substantially the following form . . . : `I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on (date). (Signature)'.'' 47 C.F.R. § 1.16. 18 U.S.C. § 1001 et seq. See also 47 C.F.R. § 1.17. P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. § 552a(e)(3). Federal Communications Commission Federal Communications Commission € × Ø Ù $ H L M ð ñ L M ð ñ L M ð ñ #yJ #yJ ´ ´ ´
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-312043A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-312043A1.pdf
  • shall be subscribed by the declarant as true under penalty of perjury, and dated, in substantially the following form . . . : `I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on (date). (Signature)'.'' 47 C.F.R. § 1.16. 18 U.S.C. § 1001 et seq. See also 47 C.F.R. § 1.17. P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. § 552a(e)(3). Federal Communications Commission Federal Communications Commission € - ˜ $ X Y { ' ° Ä Å Æ X Y { ' ° Ä Å Æ X { ' ° Ä #yJ #yJ 8 8 b 8
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-312044A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-312044A1.pdf
  • shall be subscribed by the declarant as true under penalty of perjury, and dated, in substantially the following form . . . : `I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on (date). (Signature)'.'' 47 C.F.R. § 1.16. 18 U.S.C. § 1001 et seq. See also 47 C.F.R. § 1.17. P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. § 552a(e)(3). Federal Communications Commission Federal Communications Commission € `` • $ U V x � ­ Á Â Ã U V x � ­ Á Â Ã U V x � ­ Á Â Ã #yJ #yJ ; ; ;
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-312045A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-312045A1.pdf
  • shall be subscribed by the declarant as true under penalty of perjury, and dated, in substantially the following form . . . : `I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on (date). (Signature)'.'' 47 C.F.R. § 1.16. 18 U.S.C. § 1001 et seq. See also 47 C.F.R. § 1.17. P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. § 552a(e)(3). Federal Communications Commission Federal Communications Commission € � ‚ $ J K m „ ¢ ¶ · ¸ J K m „ ¢ ¶ · ¸ J m „ ¢ ¶ Õ Þ #yJ #yJ - - -
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-312046A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-312046A1.pdf
  • shall be subscribed by the declarant as true under penalty of perjury, and dated, in substantially the following form . . . : `I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on (date). (Signature)'.'' 47 C.F.R. § 1.16. 18 U.S.C. § 1001 et seq. See also 47 C.F.R. § 1.17. P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. § 552a(e)(3). Federal Communications Commission Federal Communications Commission ¡ ¢ $ j k � ¤ Â Ö × Ø j k � ¤ Â Ö × Ø j � ¤ Â Ö #yJ #yJ F F F
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-312551A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-312551A1.pdf
  • shall be subscribed by the declarant as true under penalty of perjury, and dated, in substantially the following form . . . : `I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on (date). (Signature)'.'' 47 C.F.R. § 1.16. 18 U.S.C. § 1001 et seq. See also 47 C.F.R. § 1.17. P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. § 552a(e)(3). Federal Communications Commission Federal Communications Commission € { $ † ? @ ? @ #yJ #yJ
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-312554A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-312554A1.pdf
  • shall be subscribed by the declarant as true under penalty of perjury, and dated, in substantially the following form . . . : `I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on (date). (Signature)'.'' 47 C.F.R. § 1.16. 18 U.S.C. § 1001 et seq. See also 47 C.F.R. § 1.17. P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. § 552a(e)(3). 18 U.S.C. § 1001 et seq. Federal Communications Commission Federal Communications Commission €€ $ #yJ #yJ
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-312655A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-312655A1.pdf
  • shall be subscribed by the declarant as true under penalty of perjury, and dated, in substantially the following form . . . : `I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on (date). (Signature)'.'' 47 C.F.R. § 1.16. 18 U.S.C. § 1001 et seq. See also 47 C.F.R. § 1.17. P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. § 552a(e)(3). Federal Communications Commission Federal Communications Commission ` € � ` $ #yJ #yJ
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-312656A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-312656A1.pdf
  • shall be subscribed by the declarant as true under penalty of perjury, and dated, in substantially the following form . . . : `I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on (date). (Signature)'.'' 47 C.F.R. § 1.16. 18 U.S.C. § 1001 et seq. See also 47 C.F.R. § 1.17. P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. § 552a(e)(3). Federal Communications Commission Federal Communications Commission † € ... † $ #yJ #yJ
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-312657A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-312657A1.pdf
  • shall be subscribed by the declarant as true under penalty of perjury, and dated, in substantially the following form . . . : `I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on (date). (Signature)'.'' 47 C.F.R. § 1.16. 18 U.S.C. § 1001 et seq. See also 47 C.F.R. § 1.17. P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. § 552a(e)(3). Federal Communications Commission Federal Communications Commission ` ' € ` ' `` $ _ ` ‚ tm · Ë Ì _ ` ‚ tm · Ë Ì _ ` ‚ tm · Ë Ì #yJ #yJ 3 3 3
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-312908A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-312908A1.pdf
  • shall be subscribed by the declarant as true under penalty of perjury, and dated, in substantially the following form . . . : `I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on (date). (Signature)'.'' 47 C.F.R. § 1.16. 18 U.S.C. § 1001 et seq. See also 47 C.F.R. § 1.17. P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. § 552a(e)(3). Federal Communications Commission Federal Communications Commission (c)¦Ÿ¦˜(c)¦ € ¹ " $ $ % $ % $ % #yJ #yJ
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-313467A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-313467A1.pdf
  • shall be subscribed by the declarant as true under penalty of perjury, and dated, in substantially the following form . . . : `I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on (date). (Signature)'.'' 47 C.F.R. § 1.16. 18 U.S.C. § 1001 et seq. See also 47 C.F.R. § 1.17. P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. § 552a(e)(3). Federal Communications Commission Federal Communications Commission $ G K L ï ð K L ï ð K L ï #yJ #yJ › › ›
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-313468A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-313468A1.pdf
  • shall be subscribed by the declarant as true under penalty of perjury, and dated, in substantially the following form . . . : `I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on (date). (Signature)'.'' 47 C.F.R. § 1.16. 18 U.S.C. § 1001 et seq. See also 47 C.F.R. § 1.17. P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. § 552a(e)(3). Federal Communications Commission Federal Communications Commission $ - š › š › š › #yJ #yJ ÷ ÷ ÷
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-313584A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-313584A1.pdf
  • shall be subscribed by the declarant as true under penalty of perjury, and dated, in substantially the following form . . . : `I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on (date). (Signature)'.'' 47 C.F.R. § 1.16. 18 U.S.C. § 1001 et seq. See also 47 C.F.R. § 1.17. P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. § 552a(e)(3). Federal Communications Commission Federal Communications Commission $ C G H ë ì G H ë ì G H ë #yJ #yJ ¡ ¡ ¡
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-313585A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-313585A1.pdf
  • shall be subscribed by the declarant as true under penalty of perjury, and dated, in substantially the following form . . . : `I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on (date). (Signature)'.'' 47 C.F.R. § 1.16. 18 U.S.C. § 1001 et seq. See also 47 C.F.R. § 1.17. P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. § 552a(e)(3). Federal Communications Commission Federal Communications Commission $ S W X û ü W X û ü W X û #yJ #yJ ¯ ¯ ¯
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-313586A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-313586A1.pdf
  • shall be subscribed by the declarant as true under penalty of perjury, and dated, in substantially the following form . . . : `I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on (date). (Signature)'.'' 47 C.F.R. § 1.16. 18 U.S.C. § 1001 et seq. See also 47 C.F.R. § 1.17. P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. § 552a(e)(3). Federal Communications Commission Federal Communications Commission $ Q U V ù ú U V ù ú U V ù #yJ #yJ ­ ­ ­
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-313587A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-313587A1.pdf
  • shall be subscribed by the declarant as true under penalty of perjury, and dated, in substantially the following form . . . : `I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on (date). (Signature)'.'' 47 C.F.R. § 1.16. 18 U.S.C. § 1001 et seq. See also 47 C.F.R. § 1.17. P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. § 552a(e)(3). Federal Communications Commission Federal Communications Commission $ ¬ ° ± ° ± ° ± #yJ #yJ
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-313588A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-313588A1.pdf
  • shall be subscribed by the declarant as true under penalty of perjury, and dated, in substantially the following form . . . : `I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on (date). (Signature)'.'' 47 C.F.R. § 1.16. 18 U.S.C. § 1001 et seq. See also 47 C.F.R. § 1.17. P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. § 552a(e)(3). Federal Communications Commission Federal Communications Commission $ ­ ± ² ± ² ± ² #yJ #yJ
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-314039A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-314039A1.pdf
  • shall be subscribed by the declarant as true under penalty of perjury, and dated, in substantially the following form . . . : `I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on (date). (Signature)'.'' 47 C.F.R. § 1.16. 18 U.S.C. § 1001 et seq. See also 47 C.F.R. § 1.17. P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. § 552a(e)(3). Federal Communications Commission Federal Communications Commission , * , € , $ µ Y - = � ž - = X � ž - = X � , = X #yJ #yJ
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-314040A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-314040A1.pdf
  • shall be subscribed by the declarant as true under penalty of perjury, and dated, in substantially the following form . . . : `I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on (date). (Signature)'.'' 47 C.F.R. § 1.16. 18 U.S.C. § 1001 et seq. See also 47 C.F.R. § 1.17. P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. § 552a(e)(3). Federal Communications Commission Federal Communications Commission / - / € / $ A B d t „ õ ö A B d t „ Ÿ õ ö A B d t „ Ÿ õ / „ Ÿ #yJ #yJ
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-314041A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-314041A1.pdf
  • shall be subscribed by the declarant as true under penalty of perjury, and dated, in substantially the following form . . . : `I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on (date). (Signature)'.'' 47 C.F.R. § 1.16. 18 U.S.C. § 1001 et seq. See also 47 C.F.R. § 1.17. P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. § 552a(e)(3). Federal Communications Commission Federal Communications Commission 7 5 7 € 7 $ M N p € � M N p € � " M N p € � " 7 � " #yJ #yJ
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-314042A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-314042A1.pdf
  • shall be subscribed by the declarant as true under penalty of perjury, and dated, in substantially the following form . . . : `I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on (date). (Signature)'.'' 47 C.F.R. § 1.16. 18 U.S.C. § 1001 et seq. See also 47 C.F.R. § 1.17. P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. § 552a(e)(3). Federal Communications Commission Federal Communications Commission H F H € H $ Ù z { � ­ ½ z { � ­ ½ Ø z { � ­ ½ Ø H ½ Ø #yJ #yJ E E E
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-314315A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-314315A1.pdf
  • shall be subscribed by the declarant as true under penalty of perjury, and dated, in substantially the following form . . . : `I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on (date). (Signature)'.'' 47 C.F.R. § 1.16. 18 U.S.C. § 1001 et seq. See also 47 C.F.R. § 1.17. P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. § 552a(e)(3). Federal Communications Commission Federal Communications Commission 1 €€ 1 2 $ 0 0 #yJ #yJ
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-314316A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-314316A1.pdf
  • shall be subscribed by the declarant as true under penalty of perjury, and dated, in substantially the following form . . . : `I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on (date). (Signature)'.'' 47 C.F.R. § 1.16. 18 U.S.C. § 1001 et seq. See also 47 C.F.R. § 1.17. P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. § 552a(e)(3). Federal Communications Commission Federal Communications Commission € + , $ #yJ #yJ
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-314320A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-314320A1.pdf
  • shall be subscribed by the declarant as true under penalty of perjury, and dated, in substantially the following form . . . : `I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on (date). (Signature)'.'' 47 C.F.R. § 1.16. 18 U.S.C. § 1001 et seq. See also 47 C.F.R. § 1.17. P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. § 552a(e)(3). Federal Communications Commission Federal Communications Commission € $ #yJ #yJ
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-314686A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-314686A1.pdf
  • shall be subscribed by the declarant as true under penalty of perjury, and dated, in substantially the following form . . . : `I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on (date). (Signature)'.'' 47 C.F.R. § 1.16. 18 U.S.C. § 1001 et seq. See also 47 C.F.R. § 1.17. P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. § 552a(e)(3). Federal Communications Commission Federal Communications Commission $ % ) * Í Î ð ) * Í Î ð #yJ #yJ - - -
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-399A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-399A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-399A1.txt
  • nations' access lines are Bell South, Qwest, Verizon, SBC Communications, and Sprint. We note that in the section 271 context, the issue of whether disparities in performance are due to conduct of the BOC or competitors has been a fact-intensive, highly contested issue. The Telecommunications Act of 1996 (1996 Act), Pub. L. No. 104-104 § 402(b)(2). . Pursuant to section 1.17 of our rules, carriers are obliged to file accurate information with the Commission. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.17. Section 1.80 provides for application of the statutory maximum forfeiture for ``misrepresentation/lack of candor.'' See 47 C.F.R. § 1.80(b)(4). In 1998, for example, interexchange carriers purchased $25.25 billion in interstate access services from incumbent LECs. See FCC, Statistics of Communications Common Carriers
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-414A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-414A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-414A1.txt
  • violated Section 1.65 of the Commission's Rules by failing to notify the Commission of its premature operation of service in either its underlying applications or its STA requests; (3) whether Liberty has misrepresented facts to the Commission, lacked candor in its dealings with the Commission, or attempted to mislead the Commission, and in this regard, whether Liberty has violated Section 1.17 of the Commission's Rules; and (4) whether Liberty possesses the requisite character qualifications to be granted the subject OFS applications. Hearing Designation Order and Notice of Opportunity for Hearing, 11 FCC Rcd 14133 (1996) ("HDO"). The HDO also called for a determination of whether an order of forfeiture should be issued against Liberty pursuant to Section 503(b) of the Act
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-445A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-445A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-445A1.txt
  • KWMU-FM, St. Louis, Missouri. On May 29, 1997, Commission staff sent the licensee a letter of inquiry requesting information about the licensee's EEO efforts over a three-year period -- i.e., from February 1, 1994 to February 1, 1997. Thereafter, the licensee again amended its Form 396 to reflect both the Sullivan case and the Schieszer complaint. This case concerned Section 1.17 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.17. However, the pertinent language of the provision is the same as the pertinent language in Section 73.1015. Federal Communications Commission FCC 00-445 Federal Communications Commission FCC 00-445 ˆ - „0ý „0ý „0ý „0ý „0ý „0ý „0ý „`ú „0ý
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-55A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-55A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-55A1.txt
  • N. Koplin, Hinsdale Management Corporation, to concerned parties (March 13, 1996). Gencom, Inc. v. FCC, 832 F.2d 171, 181 (D.C. Cir. 1987). Application of Wine Country Radio, 11 FCC Rcd 2333, 2334 ¶6 (1996) (citing Johnson v. United States, 628 F.2d 187 (D.C. Cir. 1980)). Application at 7. 47 C.F.R. § 1.16. 47 C.F.R. § 1.52. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.17. Swan Creek Communications v. FCC, 39 F.3d 1217, 1222 (D.C. Cir. 1994). See 18 U.S.C. § 1001. Quatron Opposition at 6-7; O'Hare Opposition at 6-7. 47 C.F.R. § 90.157(a) (emphasis added). 47 C.F.R. 90.157(a). Federal Communications Commission FCC 00-55 Federal Communications Commission FCC 00-55 8 9 èÔèäèÛè < = ) 9 W Ü ö b d&öÊB¦
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-91A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-91A1.txt
  • raise section 271 issues, including but not limited to the Applicants' post-divestiture use of in-region Internet backbone. See, e.g., MCI Worldcom Comments at 3, 6-7; Allegiance Reply Comments at 5. 9 We expect the Applicants to be both truthful and forthcoming in responding to any Commission request for information deemed necessary to review the divestiture plan. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.17 requiring truthful written statements and responses to Commission inquiries and correspondence ("No applicant, permittee or licensee shall in any response to Commission correspondence or inquiry or in any application, pleading, report or any other written statement submitted to the Commission, make any misrepresentation or willful material omission bearing on any matter within the jurisdiction of the Commission."). Federal Communications Commission
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-208A2.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-208A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-208A2.txt
  • 5.82 13.47 3.14 4b PO-1-06 Facility Available (Loop Qualification) - CORBA 13.17 2.42 11.00 2.36 13.75 2.71 13.47 2.62 PO-1-06 Facility Available (Loop Qualification) - Web GUI 13.17 6.35 11.00 5.65 13.75 2.70 13.47 4.96 PO-1-07 Rejected Query - EDI 0.13 2.85 0.16 2.45 0.10 2.52 0.10 2.26 PO-1-07 Rejected Query - CORBA 0.13 1.05 0.16 4.29 0.10 1.26 0.10 1.17 PO-1-07 Rejected Query - Web GUI 0.13 5.74 0.16 4.80 0.10 3.65 0.10 3.51 PO-1-08 OSS Interface - % Timeouts - EDI 0.10 0.25 1.53 0.64 PO-1-08 OSS Interface - % Timeouts - CORBA 0.12 0.36 0.40 0.12 PO-1-08 OSS Interface - % Timeouts - Web GUI 0.54 0.21 0.37 PO-1-09 Parsed CSR - EDI 2.75 3.17 2.76 4.12 2.69
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-208A3.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-208A3.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-208A3.txt
  • 13.75 NA 13.47 NA PO-1-06 Facility Available (Loop Qualification) - CORBA 13.17 2.42 11.00 2.60 13.75 2.87 13.47 3.44 PO-1-06 Facility Available (Loop Qualification) - Web GUI 13.17 6.35 11.00 6.56 13.75 1.86 13.47 5.30 PO-1-07 Rejected Query - EDI 0.13 2.85 0.16 1.90 0.10 2.52 0.10 2.26 PO-1-07 Rejected Query - CORBA 0.13 1.05 0.16 1.28 0.10 1.26 0.10 1.17 PO-1-07 Rejected Query - Web GUI 0.13 5.74 0.16 4.12 0.10 3.65 0.10 3.51 PO-1-08 OSS Interface - % Timeouts - EDI 0.10 0.00 0.40 0.41 PO-1-08 OSS Interface - % Timeouts - CORBA 0.12 0.00 0.28 0.16 PO-1-08 OSS Interface - % Timeouts - Web GUI 0.82 0.04 0.00 PO-1-09 Parsed CSR - EDI 2.75 3.17 2.76 NA 2.69
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-240A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-240A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-240A1.txt
  • 47 U.S.C. § 301, and Section 94.23 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 94.23, involving unauthorized operations, whether Liberty violated Section 1.65 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.65, by failing to disclose these activations in pending applications and STA requests, and whether Liberty misrepresented facts, lacked candor, or attempted to mislead the Commission, and thus violated Section 1.17 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.17. Hearing Designation Order and Notice of Opportunity for Hearing, 11 FCC Rcd 14133 (1996) ("HDO"). The HDO also called for a determination of whether an order of forfeiture up to the statutory maximum should be issued against Liberty pursuant to Section 503(b) of the Act, 47 U.S.C. § 503(b), for violations of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-29A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-29A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-29A1.txt
  • 271-No. 43a-b and 271-No. 45a-b. See SWBT Aggregated Performance Data, Measurement No. 29-04, Kansas and Oklahoma, (``Percent SWBT Caused Missed Due Dates-No Field Work-Business-POTS - Resale''), at 271-No. 29-a. In Oklahoma, the disparity was 0.01 percent in July, 0.65 percent in August, 0.43 percent in September and 1.20 percent in October. In Kansas, the disparity was 0.09 percent in July, 1.17 percent in August, 0.78 percent in September and 3.32 percent in October. See SWBT Aggregated Performance Data, Measurement Nos. 27-01 to 27-04, 29-01 to 29-04, 43-01 to 43-08, and 45-01 to 45-08, Texas, at 271-No. 27a, 271-No. 29-a, 271-No. 43a-b and 271-No. 45a-b. SWBT's only disparities were in Measurement No. 29-02 (disparity of 0.80 percent in August and 0.42 percent
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-308A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-308A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-308A1.txt
  • section 1.65 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.65; (2) apparently making a misrepresentation or a willful material omission bearing on a matter within the jurisdiction of the Commission in a written statement submitted by SBC in connection with the investigation into the filing of the incorrect affidavits in the Kansas/Oklahoma section 271 proceeding, in apparent violation of section 1.17 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.17; and (3) apparently failing to comply with the terms of a consent decree that resolved an earlier investigation of SBC involving analogous issues and required SBC to train certain employees on Commission rules relating to contacts with the agency. Based on these findings, we find SBC apparently liable for a forfeiture in
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-319A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-319A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-319A1.txt
  • in situations where the rules require an EA and the applicant certifies one is not necessary, enforcement action can be taken. For example, to the extent information comes to the Commission's attention after grant of an application suggesting the applicant intentionally incorrectly certified there would be no significant environmental effect, the Commission could impose a forfeiture for violation of section 1.17 of the rules, or potentially revoke the license for misrepresentation. Similarly, if there is evidence of substantial environmental effect that would have caused the Commission not to grant the license had it known all the relevant facts, it potentially could revoke the license. As to the NHPA, section 106 of the NHPA and the implementing rules of the ACHP require
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-338A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-338A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-338A1.txt
  • ``unilateral assertions that its OSS is adequate'' or on SWBT's ``longstanding auditor,'' Ernst & Young. Id. at 3; WorldCom Missouri I Comments at 12-14. See, e.g., SBC Communications, Inc Apparent Liability for Forfeiture, FCC 01-308 (rel. Oct. 16, 2001) (finding SBC apparently liable for a $2.52 million forfeiture for apparent violations of the SBC/SNET consent decree and 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.17 and 1.65). Notably, Ernst & Young submitted an attestation that confirms SWBT's assertion that it undertook corrections of the problem that results in orders posting out-of-sequence. See SWBT Application Arkansas and Missouri II Affs. A, Vol. 4, Affidavits of Michael Kelly (SWBT Kelly Arkansas Aff., SWBT Kelly Missouri II Aff.), paras. 2, 5. We note, however, that where we are
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-341A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-341A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-341A1.txt
  • that: "[T]here is no date . . . for which the submission of the requested information would be convenient." Id. at 2064 ¶ 8. The Commission thereupon designated this case for hearing. Id. Of the eight issues originally designated, four remain before us: a) To determine whether James A. Kay, Jr. has violated Section 308(b) of the Act and/or Section 1.17 of the Commission's Rules by failing to provide information requested in his responses to Commission inquiries; . . . . c) To determine if Kay has willfully or repeatedly violated any of the Commission's construction and operation requirements in violation of Sections 90.155, 90.157, 90.313, 90.623, 90.627, 90.631, and 90.633 of the Commission's Rules; d) To determine whether [Kay] has
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-342A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-342A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-342A1.txt
  • information. A lengthy exchange ensued, in which Kay and the Bureau wrestled over what information Kay would provide and when he would provide it. Kay's actions during the course of this exchange are the basis for the Commission's determination that Kay improperly failed to respond to the Bureau's inquiries in violation of 47 U.S.C. § 308(b) and 47 C.F.R. § 1.17. The Commission makes this determination in the face of a contrary decision and express findings by the ALJ. That ALJ, Judge Chachkin, found that ``the Bureau was engaged in a fishing expedition with the hope that something would turn up,'' that ``Kay was being asked to provide virtually every detail regarding the operation of his business[,] . . . include[ing]
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-369A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-369A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-369A1.txt
  • orders, legal process, statutory authorizations, and certifications for interception of, access to or disclosure of Domestic Communications, Call Associated Data, Transactional Data or Subscriber Information authorized by U.S. federal, state or local law. 1.16 "MES" means a mobile earth station (i.e., a hand-held, portable or other mobile terminal capable of receiving and/or transmitting Wire Communications or Electronic Communications by satellite). 1.17 "Non U.S.-Licensed MES" means an Inmarsat MES other than a U.S.-Licensed MES. 1.18 "Party" or "Parties" have the meaning given in the Preamble. 1.19 "Pro forma assignments" or "pro forma transfers of control" are transfers or assignments that do not "involve a substantial change in ownership or control" of the licenses as provided in 47 C.F.R. 63.24. 1. 20 "Sensitive
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-391A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-391A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-391A1.txt
  • Andre Cote, Vice President, Operations, SIRSA (Nov. 9, 1992) (FCC File No. 592696 NABER letter). See Waiver Request at 19-21. See Waiver II at 9. See Hauppauge Fire District, Memorandum Opinion and Order, DA 99-2830 (WTB PSPWD rel. Dec. 21, 1999) at ¶ 10-12. FCC File Nos. 592687, 592691, 592693, 592694, 592695, 592696, 592697 and 592698. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.17. If LMR declines to submit additional information, we believe, in light of the factors noted below, that LMR has failed to establish its eligibility to use the frequencies in question. Under those circumstances, we believe the Division would be justified in dismissing LMR's applications. Order, 14 FCC Rcd at 17237 ¶ 20. 47 C.F.R. § 90.179(d). Application for Review at
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-112A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-112A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-112A1.txt
  • for Forfeiture, 7 FCC Rcd 3378, 3379 (Mass Media Bureau 1992) (noting that a forfeiture in the ``full amount . . . allowed by law'' was to be imposed because the company's reply ``included only non-notarized statements . . . although [the Mass Media Bureau] had requested notarized affidavits''). The fact that 18 U.S.C. § 1001 and 47 C.F.R. § 1.17 require SBC to tell the truth does not, as SBC suggests, render an attestation superfluous. See NAL Response at 16, 28. Requiring submission of an attestation may elicit a higher level of care and attention than the level that answers unaccompanied by verification may prompt. Attestations can be necessary to attain the level of reliability that we require to enforce
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-142A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-142A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-142A1.txt
  • employees who were involved in the preparation and review of the August 6, 2001 letter knew on or around July 16, 2001 that E-OTD-capable handsets would not be available before the initial launch of GSM service in Seattle. The Enforcement Bureau continues to investigate this matter to determine whether AT&T Wireless may have engaged in misrepresentation in violation of Section 1.17 of the Rules. The base amount for any forfeiture for a violation of Section 1.17 is $120,000, the statutory maximum. In order to expedite any enforcement action that may be appropriate at the conclusion of the Bureau's investigation of this matter, for the limited purposes of this matter, we delegate authority to the Chief, Enforcement Bureau, to issue a Notice
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-153A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-153A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-153A1.txt
  • EB-01-IH-0339 ) EB-01-IH-0453 ) NAL/Acct. No.200132080059 ) FRN Nos. 0004-3051-24 SBC Communications, Inc. ) 0004-3335-71 ) 0005-1937-01 ORDER Adopted: May 22, 2002 Released: May 28, 2002 By the Commission: The Commission has been conducting two investigations into potential violations by SBC Communications, Inc. (``SBC'') of sections 251 and 271 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``the Act''), sections 1.17 and 1.65 of the Commission's Rules, and the requirements of the SBC/SNET Consent Decree. These investigations focused on competitors' access to SBC's operations support systems (``OSS'') and information SBC provided to the Commission as part of its section 271 applications. The Commission and SBC have negotiated the terms of a Consent Decree that will terminate these investigations. A copy of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-173A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-173A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-173A1.txt
  • violated Section 220(e) of the Act by not filing true and accurate data in FCC Form 499-A; (k) to determine whether the Publix Companies engaged in a pervasive pattern of misrepresentation or lack of candor; (l) to determine whether the Publix Companies misrepresented or willfully omitted facts in written materials submitted to the Commission, in violation of 47 C.F.R. Section 1.17; (m) to determine whether, with respect to the issues (a) through (l) specified above, the Publix Companies knew or should have known that they were committing such violations, whether they acted with the intention of violating a known duty; and whether they acted negligently, or with gross neglect of a known duty; (n) to determine whether the Publix Companies substantially
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-186A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-186A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-186A1.txt
  • (and only if) the Commission grants AT&T's claims that Beehive's access revenue-sharing arrangement was unlawful, then the Commission must also grant Beehive's claims that certain of AT&T's billing arrangements with customers violated sections 201(b), 203, and 228 (the Telephone Disclosure and Dispute Resolution Act (``TDDRA'')) of the Act for precisely the same reasons. Beehive also alleges that AT&T violated sections 1.17 and 1.729(b) of the Commission's rules by failing to disclose certain information in the AT&T Complaint proceeding. Because we deny AT&T's claims that Beehive's access revenue-sharing arrangement was unlawful, the condition precedent pled by Beehive has not been satisfied, and thus we dismiss Beehive's claims under sections 201(b), 203, and 228 of the Act. In addition, we deny Beehive's claims
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-197A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-197A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-197A1.txt
  • licensees and expects all licensees to deal truthfully and accurately with the Commission at all times. While we find no basis at this time to question Comsat's basic qualifications or to grant LRT's request for reconsideration because of this incident, we will refer this matter to the Enforcement Bureau to consider whether there has been a possible violation of Section 1.17 of the Rules and, in light of the fact that the statute of limitations for forfeiture has passed, whether Comsat should be admonished. LRT Petition for Reconsideration, dated August 28, 2000, at 16-20, citing Jefferson Radio Co. v. FCC, 340 F.2d 781, 783 (D.C. Cir. 1964) and RKO General, Inc. 3 FCC Rcd 5057, 5060-6 (1988) appeal dismissed sub nom,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-216A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-216A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-216A1.txt
  • penalties described in 47 U.S.C. § 501-510. Violators of these provisions may be subject to enforcement action by the Commission. For example, to the extent information comes to the Commission's attention that a licensee on the January 2007 PN intentionally, incorrectly certified that it is using 6.25 kHz equipment exclusively, the Commission could impose a forfeiture for violation of section 1.17 of the rules or potentially revoke the license for misrepresentation. (See, e.g., 47 C.F.R. § 1.17 (prohibiting intentional misrepresentation); see also U.S.C. 47 § 503(b)). The Commission views the sending of reminder notifications as a convenience to the licensee and not a requirement of the Commission. Each licensee bears the responsibility of knowing the parameters and requirements of its license.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-283A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-283A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-283A1.txt
  • File No. EB-02-TS-018 ) NAL/Acct. No. 200232100002 ) FRN 0003-7665-32 Adopted: October 8, 2002 Released: October 9, 2002 By the Commission: In this Order, we adopt a Consent Decree terminating the above-captioned proceeding regarding possible violations by AT&T Wireless Services, Inc. (``AT&T Wireless'') of the enhanced 911 (``E911'') Phase II provisions of Section 20.18 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''), Sections 1.17 and 1.65 of the Rules, and the supplemental filing requirement set forth in the Commission order granting AT&T Wireless a waiver of the E911 Phase II rules for its Global System for Mobile Communications/General Packet Radio Service network. The Commission and AT&T Wireless have negotiated the terms of a Consent Decree that would resolve this matter and terminate the above-captioned
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-330A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-330A1.txt
  • UNE Loop 2/4 wire analog 8db and 5.5db loop 0.21 3.01 0.26 3.18 0.17 2.96 0.37 2.61 0.35 2.59 12 UNE Loop 4 wire Digital 1.544 mbpd capable/HDSL 0.76 0.23 0.94 0.60 1.07 0.28 1.58 0.60 0.98 0.72 12 UNE Platform - Basic Port and (8db and 5.5db) Basic Loop - Field Work/No Field Work 0.00 1.22 0.00 1.26 0.00 1.17 0.01 1.05 0.02 1.05 13 - 1394200Resale Res POTS 1-30 Days 3.50 5.23 4.00 5.08 3.82 5.44 2.17 4.98 10.40 5.49 e 13 - 1394300Resale Res POTS 31-90 Days 43.0047.92 46.52 46.31 43.78 44.65abcde 13 - 1394500Resale Bus POTS 1-30 Days 4.67 7.04 2.00 6.42 2.50 7.71 6.00 7.00 7.33 6.56abcde 13 - 1395100Resale CTX 1-30 Days 9.03 2.0010.22 6.78
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-331A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-331A1.txt
  • 7.00 13.72 5.50 0.52 1.00 7.00 0.83 1,2,4 A.2.1.3.1.1Design (Specials)/<10 circuits/Dispatch/FL (days) 21.96 10.11 23.01 6.62 23.84 12.49 26.81 10.74 23.69 2.50 1 A.2.1.3.1.2Design (Specials)/<10 circuits/Non- Dispatch/FL (days) 10.98 4.13 8.45 4.50 8.97 3.58 7.29 4.56 8.04 2.61 1,2,4 A.2.1.4.1.1PBX/<10 circuits/Dispatch/FL (days) 12.69 4.67 12.49 6.00 12.94 12.73 0.67 8.10 0.33 1,2,4,5 A.2.1.4.1.2PBX/<10 circuits/Non-Dispatch/FL (days) 5.49 4.79 6.50 2.87 4.52 1.17 1.90 1.05 3.30 1.17 2,4,5 A.2.1.4.2.1PBX/>=10 circuits/Dispatch/FL (days) 70.50 68.60 4.00 12.42 15.93 A.2.1.4.2.2PBX/>=10 circuits/Non-Dispatch/FL (days) 3.51 5.50 8.97 1.28 9.00 5.89 4.50 6.68 1.56 1,3,4,5 A.2.1.5.1.1Centrex/<10 circuits/Dispatch/FL (days) 6.56 1.00 7.24 8.15 6.51 6.03 1 A.2.1.5.1.2Centrex/<10 circuits/Non- Dispatch/FL (days) 1.43 3.04 2.18 1.55 4.18 0.89 5.83 2.00 3.72 5.00 1,3,4,5 A.2.1.5.2.1Centrex/>=10 circuits/Dispatch/FL (days) 9.70 14.78 13.32 11.32 10.54 A.2.1.5.2.2Centrex/>=10
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-54A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-54A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-54A1.txt
  • Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C. 20554 In the Matter of Amendment of Section 1.17 of the Commission's Rules Concerning Truthful Statements to the Commission. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) GC Docket No. 02-37 Adopted: February 14, 2002 Released: February 22, 2002 Comment Date: 30 days after publication in the Federal Register Reply Comment Date: 45 days after publication in the Federal Register By the Commission: 1. By this notice of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-165A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-165A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-165A1.txt
  • Commission permanently reassign TV channel 16 to the use of land mobile communications for the public safety community in the greater New York metropolitan area. FREQUENCY # OF # OF CO-CHAN DIR. CALL STATE ADJ DIR. CALL STATE (MHz) CSN MOBLS DIST(mi) Deg. SIGN DIST(mi) Deg. SIGN BEST USEABLE FREQUENCIES - VHF BAND 153.5300 3 240 29.72 290 KED793 NJ 1.17 38 WPLX726 NY 151.6700 1 0 27.9 204 WPMK746 NJ 0.59 44 WNUJ744 NY 151.0250 5 340 26.41 7 WNLF882 NJ 11.78 312 WNRM842 NJ 154.6100 1 0 22.17 353 WPOX628 NY 0 156 WPLP823 NY 159.6900 4 620 18.99 47 WPMV662 NJ 4.9 261 WPQK983 NJ 153.5450 7 130 17.21 81 WRY348 NY 13.88 94 WPPT453 NY 151.4000 4
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-268A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-268A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-268A1.txt
  • that was not properly extended, and that Southern lacks the character qualifications needed to assign the authorization. For the reasons discussed below, we affirm prior staff actions, and grant pending applications for license, assignment, and noncommercial status. We also issue a Notice of Apparent Liability to Southern for its submission of two letters with altered dates in violation of Section 1.17 of our rules. I. Discussion A. Extension Application 3. Effect of Rule Change. A central issue in this proceeding is the validity of WKVE(FM)'s construction permit under the rules in effect when construction was completed in February 1996. We have since changed those rules significantly, and the parties dispute whether the changes moot this central question. They do not. In
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-303A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-303A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-303A1.txt
  • 2001). By Order dated April 20, 2001, however, the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit granted the Commission's motion to hold Rainbow's appeal in abeyance until the Commission first considers the licensee's Petition for Reconsideration. Accordingly, we deny Rainbow's request. On March 4, 2003, the Commission amended Section 73.1015 and cross referenced it with Section 1.17 of the Commission's Rules dealing with truthful and accurate statements to the Commission. The Commission also amended Section 73.1015 to cross reference the revised Section 1.17. See Section 1.17 of the Commission's Rules Concerning Truthful Statements to the Commission, 18 FCC Rcd 4016 (2003). On May 29, 1997, Commission staff sent the licensee a letter of inquiry requesting information about
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-3A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-3A2.txt
  • and individual programs and events delivered through the Unidirectional Digital Cable Product on a service by service or individual program or event basis. 1.16 "Referenced Technology" means those standards set forth on Exhibit A hereto; provided however, Referenced Technology does not include any third party proprietary technology referenced in or required by such standards, such as DES, DTCP, or MPEG-2. 1.17 "Robustness Rules" mean the rules described in Exhibit C hereto, as such rules may be amended from time to time in accordance with Section 6.2. 1.18 "Test Tools" means devices that (a) utilize the DFAST Technology and have as their purpose the testing or verification of the performance of, or (b) are specifically designed for the purpose of testing or
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-45A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-45A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-45A1.txt
  • Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit � � � � È ä � - � � Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C. 20554 In the Matter of Amendment of Section 1.17 of the Commission's Rules Concerning Truthful Statements to the Commission ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) GC Docket No. 02-37 Adopted: March 4, 2003 Released: March 10, 2003 By the Commission: 1. By this report and order, we modify section 1.17 of our Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.17, which specifies the requirements for the submission of truthful
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-114A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-114A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-114A1.txt
  • intended to deceive the Commission by making a false certification regarding its compliance with the Commission's then-existing EEO rules. We nevertheless caution SFUSD that it should exercise more care in the future to ensure that the information it submits to the Commission is accurate, because a false statement, even absent an intent to deceive, may constitute a violation of Section 1.17 of the Commission's rules, as revised last year. 24. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, that, pursuant to Section 309(e) and 309(k) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, the captioned application of the San Francisco Unified School District for renewal of license of station KALW(FM), San Francisco, California IS DESIGNATED FOR HEARING, at a time and place to be specified
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-168A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-168A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-168A1.txt
  • Nextel to Michael J. Wilhelm, Esq., WTB at 16. See also Nextel Communications, Inc. Proposed Spectrum Swap: Working Through the Noise, UBS Investment Research Report dated April 15, 2004 at 6 (April 15 UBS Report). Nextel June 4, 2004 Ex Parte at 3. This record statement by Nextel, as with all such statements in the record, is governed by Section 1.17 of the Commission's rules governing accuracy in written statements to the Commission. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.17. We make a small downward adjustment to the two megahertz offset because while Nextel is giving up all of its spectrum holdings at 816-817/861-862 MHz, our records indicate that there are seventeen EA licenses in this band licensed to parties other than Nextel,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-168A1_Erratum.doc
  • Nextel to Michael J. Wilhelm, Esq., WTB at 16. See also Nextel Communications, Inc. Proposed Spectrum Swap: Working Through the Noise, UBS Investment Research Report dated April 15, 2004 at 6 (April 15 UBS Report). Nextel June 4, 2004 Ex Parte at 3. This record statement by Nextel, as with all such statements in the record, is governed by Section 1.17 of the Commission's rules governing accuracy in written statements to the Commission. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.17. We make a small downward adjustment to the two megahertz offset because while Nextel is giving up all of its spectrum holdings at 816-817/861-862 MHz, our records indicate that there are seventeen EA licenses in this band licensed to parties other than Nextel,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-276A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-276A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-276A1.txt
  • Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C. 20554 In the Matter of Amendment of Section 1.17 of the Commission's Rules Concerning Truthful Statements to the Commission ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) GC Docket No. 02-37 Adopted: November 23, 2004 Released: November 30, 2004 By the Commission: 1. By this memorandum opinion and order we deny the ``Petition for Limited Further Reconsideration,'' filed April 6, 2004, by James A. Kay, Jr. (Kay). Kay
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-65A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-65A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-65A1.txt
  • Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C. 20554 In the Matter of Amendment of Section 1.17 of the Commission's Rules Concerning Truthful Statements to the Commission ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) GC Docket No. 02-37 Adopted: March 17, 2004 Released: March 23, 2004 By the Commission: 1. By this memorandum opinion and order we deny a petition for reconsideration, filed April 28, 2003, by James A. Kay, Jr. (Kay) Kay seeks reconsideration
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-74A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-74A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-74A1.txt
  • See http://www.tscm.com/nebbia4.html. 47 C.F.R. § 2.106, footnote G56. 47 C.F.R. § 2.106, footnote US44. 47 C.F.R. § 2.106, footnote US316. Footnote 5.424A reads as follows: ``In the band 2900-3100 MHz, stations in the radiolocation service shall not cause harmful interference to, nor claim protection from, radar systems in the radionavigation service.'' See NTIA WRC-03 Recommendations, Enclosure 1 at Agenda Item 1.17 and Enclosure 2 at p. 20. See U.S. Proposal for WRC-03, Agenda Item 1.17, at pages 60-61. 47 C.F.R. § 2.1. Terms and definitions listed in Section 2.1 are the definitive terms and definitions that prevail throughout the Commission's Rules. 47 C.F.R. § 2.106. The International Table is included in our Rules for informational purposes only. 47 C.F.R. § 2.104(a).
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-87A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-87A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-87A1.txt
  • below $24,840 to qualify for Lifeline/Link-Up support even if they do not participate in one of the current qualifying assistance programs. We have included, in Appendix D, estimated income requirements for various sizes of households at or below 135% of the FPG. Our staff analysis estimates that adding an income-based criterion of 135% of the FPG could result in approximately 1.17 million to 1.29 million new Lifeline/Link-Up subscribers. Of these new Lifeline/Link-Up subscribers, the analysis projects that approximately one in five likely would be new subscribers to telephone service. Therefore, in addition to ensuring that many low-income subscribers may be better able to afford to maintain their existing service, this criterion will enable many low-income subscribers to have service for the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-87A2.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-87A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-87A2.txt
  • Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit STATEMENT OF CHAIRMAN MICHAEL K. POWELL Today's Order will help improve the ability of low-income consumers to make and receive basic telephone calls from their homes. If estimates prove correct, the expanded eligibility criteria we adopt today should make telephone service more affordable for approximately 1.17 to 1.29 million Americans - roughly 234,000 of whom will have never had basic telephone service before in their lives. Since its inception, our Lifeline/Link-Up programs have made basic telephone service affordable to millions of low-income consumers. These support measures - though often extremely modest on an individual level - have improved people's lives by making everything from jobs, to
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-12A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-12A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-12A1.txt
  • Wireline competition Average $9.13 $5.43 $14.56 28.8 $0.641 Observations 95 95 95 95 95 Standard error 0.66 0.22 0.66 1.8 0.050 Wireline incumbent Average $8.17 $5.26 $13.43 29.5 $0.581 Observations 63 63 63 63 63 Standard error 0.56 0.20 0.55 1.7 0.046 Wireline rival Average $13.38 $6.20 $19.59 25.5 $0.906 Observations 32 32 32 32 32 Standard error 1.08 0.34 1.17 2.2 0.068 DBS competition * Average $6.60 $5.72 $12.32 31.8 $0.455 Observations 38 38 38 38 38 Standard error 0.45 0.23 0.46 2.0 0.035 Wireless competition * Average $10.23 $5.50 $15.73 24.5 $0.829 Observations 28 28 28 28 28 Standard error 0.84 0.22 0.66 2.3 0.081 Low penetration test Average $7.44 $6.60 $14.03 25.8 $0.633 Observations 30 33 30 30
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-148A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-148A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-148A1.txt
  • at 1. Id. Sprint and Nextel note that the planned spin-off of Sprint's local telephone operations will be the largest independent local exchange carrier in the nation, with 2004 annual revenues exceeding $6 billion, and serving more than 7.5 million switched access lines in 18 states as of the end of June 2005. Id. at 2 n.2. See 47 CFR §1.17. See infra Section V.B.2(a)-(c). In undertaking this analysis, we considered variables that the general analyses indicate are important for predicting the incentives of the merged entity and potential responses of rivals. These included: the number and identity of rival carriers; the number of firms that can offer competitive nationwide service plans; the coverage of the firms' respective networks; the market's
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-63A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-63A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-63A1.txt
  • PanAmSat Comments at 8; PanAmSat Reply at 2. This argument is substantially similar to PanAmSat's objections to the certification procedures we adopt above. We reject PanAmSat's arguments, for the same reasons that we rejected those arguments above. WorldCom Comments at 4. Spacenet Reply at 15-16. See also 47 C.F.R. §§ 25.203(c)(3), 101.103(d). Telesat Comments at 2-3. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.17 (requiring license applicants to make truthful and accurate statements in Commission submissions). WorldCom Comments at 4. Loral Petition at 8. GE Americom Comments at 7. In cases where the earth station applicant proposes to use a routine antenna, but a higher-than-routine power level, and the applicant does not coordinate the higher power level, the Commission can authorize the applicant to
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-63A1_Erratum.doc
  • PanAmSat Comments at 8; PanAmSat Reply at 2. This argument is substantially similar to PanAmSat's objections to the certification procedures we adopt above. We reject PanAmSat's arguments, for the same reasons that we rejected those arguments above. WorldCom Comments at 4. Spacenet Reply at 15-16. See also 47 C.F.R. §§ 25.203(c)(3), 101.103(d). Telesat Comments at 2-3. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.17 (requiring license applicants to make truthful and accurate statements in Commission submissions). WorldCom Comments at 4. Loral Petition at 8. GE Americom Comments at 7. In cases where the earth station applicant proposes to use a routine antenna, but a higher-than-routine power level, and the applicant does not coordinate the higher power level, the Commission can authorize the applicant to
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-64A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-64A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-64A1.txt
  • proceeding and the reallotment action would not prejudice that inquiry. Chisholm Trail filed an Application for Review directed to that Tyler Reconsideration MO&O. 4. Subsequent to the filing of the Application for Review, the Enforcement Bureau and Tyler have entered into a Consent Decree. Pursuant to this Consent Decree, Tyler surrendered the Station KTSH license, stipulated that he violated Sections 1.17 and 73.1015 of the Commission's Rules and requested dismissal of all his applications, pleadings and proposals currently pending before the Commission. Included among the proposals was his proposed reallotment of Channel 259C3 to Tuttle which remains pending due to the filing of the Application for Review. Discussion 5. In view of the fact that the former licensee of Station KTSH
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-70A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-70A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-70A1.txt
  • We note that since the band 1240-1300 MHz is not allocated to the RNSS in the United States, NTIA has created footnote G132, which is based on footnote 5.329, except that footnote G132 applies only to the band 1215-1240 MHz, whereas footnote 5.329 applies to the band 1215-1300 MHz. See NTIA recommendations on WRC-03 implementation, Enclosure 1 at Agenda Item 1.17 and Enclosure 2 at p. 20. See U.S. Proposal for WRC-03, Agenda Item 1.17, at pages 60-61. See Spectrum Reallocation Final Report - Response to Title VI - Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act to 1993, U.S. Department of Commerce, NTIA Special Publication 95-32, February 1995, at page 5-3. Id. Reallocation of the 216-220 MHz, 1390-1395 MHz, 1427-1429 MHz, 1429-1432 MHz, 1432-1435
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05D-01A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05D-01A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05D-01A1.txt
  • (Tr. 126.) Her explanation for having represented that the stations as the only valuable asset was reasonable if she ``was referring to businesses as opposed to real estate property that [her] parents owned.'' Her explanation is plausible, and she corrected the record. A misrepresentation or lack of candor requires ``an actual intent to deceive the Commission.'' See Amendment of Section 1.17, 18 FCC Rcd 4016, 4020 (2003). ``Material'' is defined as ``important'' or ``having influence or effect;'' and a ``material misrepresentation is defined as ``one relating to matter which is so substantial or important as to influence the party to whom it is made.'' 18 FCC Rcd at 4020 n. 4. What is necessary to find in order to have ``disqualifying
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-124A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-124A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-124A1.txt
  • to Show Cause, Notice of Opportunity for Hearing, and Hearing Designation Order, 18 FCC Rcd 14938, 14964-65, ¶101 (2004); Family Broadcasting, Inc (WSTX(AM)/WSTX-FM), Order to Show Cause and Notice of Opportunity for Hearing, 16 FCC Rcd 4330, 4335 ¶ 13, 4337, ¶ 17 (2001) recon denied, 16 FCC Rcd 12810 (2001). 47 C.F.R. § 73.1015. See also 47 C.F.R. § 1.17. 47 U.S.C. §§312, 309(k)(2); Character Policy Statement, 102 FCC 2d 1179 (1986). See Character Policy Statement, 102 FCC 2d at 1210-11, ¶¶ 58-62. Id. A false certification may also constitute a misrepresentation. See, e.g., San Francisco Unified School District (KALW(FM)), Hearing Designation Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture, 19 FCC Rcd 13326, 13334, ¶ 19 nn. 40-41 (2004),
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-128A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-128A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-128A1.txt
  • provide evidence upon the following issues: to determine the effect of Mr. Doty's felony convictions on his qualifications to be and to remain a Commission licensee; to determine the effect of Mr. Doty's felony convictions on the qualifications of CRS to be and to remain a Commission licensee; to determine whether CRS made misrepresentations and/or lacked candor and/or violated Section 1.17 of the Commission's rules regarding the felony convictions of Mr. Doty in any applications filed with the Commission; to determine whether CRS failed to timely amend Commission applications to disclose Mr. Doty's felony convictions, in violation of Section 1.65 of the Commission's rules; to determine whether CRS made false certifications in any applications filed with the Commission; to determine, in
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-13A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-13A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-13A1.txt
  • that, since January of 2000, it imported, marketed and distributed for sale at least 66 different models of digital devices. A listing of these 66 models is included in Attachment A. Behringer further stated that, from January 2000 through April 2004, it manufactured approximately 1.33 million of its digital devices for sale in the United States, and actually imported approximately 1.17 million of its digital devices, which it distributed to approximately 2,000 retailers for sale in the United States. Behringer acknowledged that its audio products are Class B digital devices subject to the Commission's equipment verification and related requirements, including the applicable technical standards. Behringer also acknowledged that it had not verified compliance of any of the 66 models of its
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-167A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-167A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-167A1.txt
  • seq. and 50 U.S.C. § 1841 et seq.; (d) acquisition of location- related information concerning a service subscriber or facility; (e) preservation of any of the above information pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 2703(f); and (f) access to, or acquisition or interception of, or preservation of communications or information as described in (a) through (e) above and comparable state laws. 1.17. ``FBI'' means the Federal Bureau of Investigation. 1.18. ``Foreign'' where used in this Agreement, whether capitalized or lower case, means non-U.S. 1.19. ``GC'' means Guam Cellular and Paging, Inc. 1.20. ``Governmental Authority'' or ``Governmental Authorities'' means any government, or any governmental, administrative, or regulatory entity, authority, commission, board, agency, instrumentality, bureau, or political subdivision, and any court, tribunal, judicial, or
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-179A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-179A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-179A1.txt
  • $17.06 $13.00 $16.54 Standard error 0.41 0.38 0.72 0.75 0.56 1.29 0.64 0.69 1.61 Expanded basic $28.74 $29.08 $25.35 $22.35 $23.35 $19.53 $26.28 $29.74 $23.93 Standard error 0.52 0.49 0.90 0.97 0.82 1.39 0.86 0.74 1.82 Basic + expanded basic tiers $43.04 $43.33 $40.15 $35.94 $35.78 $36.38 $43.34 $42.74 $40.47 Standard error 0.32 0.30 0.62 0.88 0.89 0.86 0.44 0.36 1.17 Digital tier plus equipment $12.99 $13.10 $11.85 $13.11 $12.68 $14.32 $11.10 $11.41 $6.65 Standard error 0.26 0.23 0.53 0.60 0.53 0.81 0.39 0.54 1.32 January 1, 2004 Basic $13.84 $13.79 $14.41 $13.01 $11.92 $16.05 $15.92 $14.29 $16.07 Standard error 0.40 0.38 0.70 0.74 0.57 1.22 0.59 0.70 1.48 Expanded basic $27.07 $27.39 $23.88 $21.12 $22.08 $18.43 $25.32 $26.90 $22.72 Standard
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-100A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-100A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-100A1.txt
  • for Forfeiture (``NAL'') proposing a $1,000,000 forfeiture against Behringer for its apparent willful and repeated violation of the equipment marketing restrictions and related requirements. Specifically, the NAL found that since January 2000, Behringer has imported and marketed in the United States 66 models of unauthorized digital audio music devices. Between January 2000 and March 2004, Behringer imported and distributed approximately 1.17 million such devices for sale in the United States. The NAL further found that between April 2004 and February 2005 Behringer continued to import and market unauthorized devices, even though it had previously represented to the Enforcement Bureau in response to the first letter of inquiry (``LOI'') that it had initiated compliance measures. In this regard, during the one-year period
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-125A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-125A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-125A1.txt
  • approval would have been required under Section 310(d) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended and Section 1.948 of the Commission's Rules. Questions about the corporate composition of PCSI and whether control of the company was transferred without prior Commission consent require further inquiry at hearing, as specified in the Ordering Clauses below. Misrepresentation and Lack of Candor Section 1.17 of the Commission's Rules prohibits misrepresentations and lack of candor in Commission filings. ``The bedrock requirement for absolute truth and candor from a Commission licensee or from a licensee or applicant is, simply stated, this agency's quintessential regulatory demand.'' Material misrepresentations to the Commission or an intentional lack of candor with respect to matters affecting an applicant's basic eligibility status
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-132A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-132A1.pdf
  • adopted a benchmark approach for Personal Communications Service (PCS), it stated: ``Licensees must file maps and other supporting documents showing compliance with the respective construction requirements within the appropriate five- and ten-year benchmarks of the date of their initial licenses.'' 47 C.F.R. § 24.203(c). See, e.g., Cellular South 700 MHz Further Notice Comments at 5. See, e.g., 47 C.F.R. § 1.17 (Truthful and accurate statements to the Commission); 47 C.F.R. § 1.917 (``Willful false statements made therein, however, are punishable by fine and imprisonment, 18 U.S.C. 1001, and by appropriate administrative sanctions, including revocation of station license pursuant to 312(a)(1) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended.''). We decline to adopt the suggestion from RTG that we define a bright
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-132A1_Erratum.doc
  • adopted a benchmark approach for Personal Communications Service (PCS), it stated: ``Licensees must file maps and other supporting documents showing compliance with the respective construction requirements within the appropriate five- and ten-year benchmarks of the date of their initial licenses.'' 47 C.F.R. § 24.203(c). See, e.g., Cellular South 700 MHz Further Notice Comments at 5. See, e.g., 47 C.F.R. § 1.17 (Truthful and accurate statements to the Commission); 47 C.F.R. § 1.917 (``Willful false statements made therein, however, are punishable by fine and imprisonment, 18 U.S.C. 1001, and by appropriate administrative sanctions, including revocation of station license pursuant to 312(a)(1) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended.''). We decline to adopt the suggestion from RTG that we define a bright
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-138A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-138A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-138A1.txt
  • (``CPT''), licensee of NCE station KBDI-TV, channel *12 and permittee of KBDI-DT, channel *38, Broomfield, CO, received channel *38 for its TCD in the proposed DTV Table. See Seventh Further Notice, 21 FCC Rcd at 12123, App. A. CPT requests the substitution of Channel *13 for Channel *38 for KBDI. The Commission's engineering analysis shows that this substitution would cause 1.17 percent new interference to KTNE, Alliance, NE. However, KTNE has agreed to accept this interference. See Colorado Public Television ex parte (dated June 21, 2007) at 1. Accordingly, we grant the requested substitution. We note that the Commission recently denied KBDI's request for a waiver of the July 1, 2006 ``use or lose'' deadline on the ground that KBDI did
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-140A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-140A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-140A1.txt
  • IVDS) 3 10 1,650 1,599 53 55 1,650 Marine (Ship) 8,000 10 800,000 775,092 10 10 800,000 GMRS 16,000 5 425,000 411,768 5 5 400,000 Aviation (Aircraft) 8,800 10 300,000 290,659 3 5 440,000 Marine (Coast) 360 10 120,000 116,264 32 30 108,000 Aviation (Ground) 1,650 10 150,000 145,330 9 10 165,000 Amateur Vanity Call Signs 14,700 10 177,116 171,601 1.17 1.17 171,990 AM Class A 68 1 217,350 210,428 3,095 3,100 210,800 AM Class B 1,567 1 2,619,500 2,534,141 1,617 1,625 2,546,375 AM Class C 937 1 921,500 890,541 950 950 890,150 AM Class D 1,705 1 3,095,750 2,994,982 1,757 1,750 2,983,750 FM Classes A, B1 & C3 3,027 1 6,519,500 6,311,615 2,085 2,075 6,281,025 FM Classes B, C, C0,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-175A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-175A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-175A1.txt
  • apply in such circumstances, and it seeks a declaration that Farmers' tariffed rates are ``void ab initio,'' thereby entitling Qwest to a damages award. We decline to rule as Qwest requests. As an initial matter, Qwest contends that factual statements Farmers made to the Commission in support of its tariff filing were ``incorrect'' and/or ``misleading,'' in violation of Commission rule 1.17(a)(1) and (2), because Farmers failed to disclose its purported plan to increase interstate access volumes. Under the Commission's rules, Farmers was required to report its historical cost and demand figures, which the Commission determined are ``likely to be a close and unbiased substitute for prospective data.'' In fact, the Commission specifically declined to include a requirement that carriers provide any
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-43A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-43A1.txt
  • the Parties. 1.14. "Electronic Communication" has the meaning given it in 18 U.S.C. § 2510(12). 1.15. "FBI" means the Federal Bureau of Investigation. 4 1.16. "Foreign Entity" means any Foreign Person; any entity established under the laws of a country other than the United States, or any government other than the U.S. Government or a U.S. state or local government. 1.17. "Foreign Person" means any Person who is not a U.S. Person as provided by 31 C.F.R. § 800.222. 1.18. "Hosting Services" means Web hosting (whether shared or dedicated, and including design, server management, maintenance and telecommunications services), Web site traffic management, electronic commerce, streamed media services, server collocation and management, application hosting, and all other similar services offered by the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-55A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-55A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-55A1.txt
  • IVDS) 3 10 1,650 1,599 53 55 1,650 Marine (Ship) 8,000 10 800,000 775,092 10 10 800,000 GMRS 16,000 5 425,000 411,768 5 5 400,000 Aviation (Aircraft) 8,800 10 300,000 290,659 3 5 440,000 Marine (Coast) 360 10 120,000 116,264 32 30 108,000 Aviation (Ground) 1,650 10 150,000 145,330 9 10 165,000 Amateur Vanity Call Signs 14,700 10 177,116 171,601 1.17 1.17 171,990 AM Class A 68 1 217,350 210,428 3,095 3,100 210,800 AM Class B 1,567 1 2,619,500 2,534,141 1,617 1,625 2,546,375 AM Class C 937 1 921,500 890,541 950 950 890,150 AM Class D 1,705 1 3,095,750 2,994,982 1,757 1,750 2,983,750 FM Classes A, B1 & C3 3,027 1 6,519,500 6,311,615 2,085 2,075 6,281,025 FM Classes B, C, C0,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-109A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-109A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-109A1.txt
  • reception capability. In addition, we propose a forfeiture in the amount of eleven thousand dollars ($11,000) against Syntax-Brillian for providing to the Commission, during the course of staff's investigation of its violations of the DTV tuner requirement, material factual information that is incorrect without a reasonable basis for believing the material factual information was correct, in willful violation of Section 1.17(a)(2) of the Rules. background The Commission adopted the DTV reception capability requirement in 2002. That requirement, which also is often termed the ``DTV tuner requirement,'' requires that all new television broadcast receivers that are imported into the United States or shipped in interstate commerce be capable of receiving the signals of DTV broadcast stations over-the-air. The DTV tuner requirement was
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-126A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-126A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-126A1.txt
  • (per license) (47 CFR part 95) 5 Rural Radio (47 CFR part 22) (previously listed under the Land Mobile category) 15 PLMRS (Shared Use) (per license) (47 CFR part 90) 15 Aviation (Aircraft) (per station) (47 CFR part 87) 5 Aviation (Ground) (per license) (47 CFR part 87) 10 Amateur Vanity Call Signs (per call sign) (47 CFR part 97) 1.17 CMRS Mobile/Cellular Services (per unit) (47 CFR parts 20, 22, 24, 27, 80 and 90) .18 CMRS Messaging Services (per unit) (47 CFR parts 20, 22, 24 and 90) .08 Broadband Radio Service (formerly MMDS/ MDS) (per license sign) (47 CFR part 21) Local Multipoint Distribution Service (per call sign) (47 CFR, part 101) 325 325 AM Radio Construction Permits
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-163A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-163A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-163A1.txt
  • Forfeiture (``NAL'') by the Commission against Funai for possible violations of Section 330(c) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, (``Act''), Section 15.120(d)(2) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''), regarding Funai's apparent interstate shipment, after March 15, 2006, of digital television receivers that do not comply with the Commission's rules regarding program blocking technology requirements for televisions receivers, and Section 1.17 of the Rules regarding Funai's apparent inaccurate statements to the Commission. The Commission and Funai have negotiated the terms of the Consent Decree that resolve this matter. A copy of the Consent Decree is attached hereto and incorporated by reference. After reviewing the terms of the Consent Decree and evaluating the facts before us, we find that the public interest
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-182A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-182A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-182A1.txt
  • (per license) (47 CFR part 95) 5 Rural Radio (47 CFR part 22) (previously listed under the Land Mobile category) 15 PLMRS (Shared Use) (per license) (47 CFR part 90) 15 Aviation (Aircraft) (per station) (47 CFR part 87) 5 Aviation (Ground) (per license) (47 CFR part 87) 10 Amateur Vanity Call Signs (per call sign) (47 CFR part 97) 1.17 CMRS Mobile/Cellular Services (per unit) (47 CFR parts 20, 22, 24, 27, 80 and 90) .18 CMRS Messaging Services (per unit) (47 CFR parts 20, 22, 24 and 90) .08 Broadband Radio Service (formerly MMDS/ MDS) (per license sign) (47 CFR part 21) Local Multipoint Distribution Service (per call sign) (47 CFR, part 101) 325 325 AM Radio Construction Permits
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-183A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-183A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-183A1.txt
  • Director of FCC and Regulatory Policy, Comcast Corporation, to Kris A. Monteith, Chief, Enforcement Bureau, File No. EB-08-IH-1518, at 5 (Jan. 25, 2008) (Comcast Response Letter). Topolski Comments at 3-4 (Feb. 25, 2008). Id. at 4. Comcast's statements in its comments and response to Free Press's complaint raise troubling questions about Comcast's candor during this proceeding. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.17. Letter from Kathryn A. Zachem, Vice President of Regulatory Affairs, Comcast Corporation, to Marlene H. Dortch, Secretary, FCC, at 5 (July 10, 2008) (Comcast Technical Ex Parte). Formal Complaint of Free Press and Public Knowledge against Comcast Corporation for Secretly Degrading Peer-to-Peer Applications, File No. EB-08-IH-1518 (Nov. 1, 2007) (Free Press Complaint). Free Press sought, among other remedies, a permanent
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-187A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-187A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-187A1.txt
  • not comply with the Commission's rules regarding digital television (``DTV'') reception capability. Additionally, we find Invision apparently liable for a forfeiture in the amount of $4,000 for providing to the Commission, during the course of its investigation, material factual information that is incorrect without a reasonable basis for believing the material factual information was correct, in willful violation of Section 1.17(a)(2) of the Rules. In light of evidence that the company has continued to import and ship interstate television receivers in violation of our rules, we further order Invision to submit a report within 10 days of release of this NAL certifying that it has ceased all such unlawful conduct. Background The Commission adopted the DTV reception capability requirement in 2002.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-230A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-230A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-230A1.txt
  • continue requiring the NSA to include a detailed build-out schedule that is consistent with the performance benchmarks and requirements that we propose above. See, e.g., 47 C.F.R. § 1.946. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.946(d) (``The notification must be filed with Commission within 15 days of the expiration of the applicable construction or coverage period.''). See, e.g., 47 C.F. R. § 1.17 (Truthful and accurate statements to the Commission); 47 C.F.R. § 1.917 (``Willful false statements made therein, however, are punishable by fine and imprisonment, 18 U.S.C. 1001, and by appropriate administrative sanctions, including revocation of station license pursuant to 312(a)(1) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended.''). See, e.g., AASHTO Comments at 11; APCO Comments at 30; Council Tree Comments
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-252A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-252A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-252A1.txt
  • the ``Percent of interest held'' field and that ``an incorrect figure was inadvertently entered in that field.'' Application for Review at 4. We remind Evangelism that it is required to use due diligence in providing correct and non-misleading information to the Commission, including taking steps to determine the truthfulness of what is being submitted. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 73.1015 and 1.17. We caution Evangelism that a failure to submit truthful and accurate statements to the Commission pursuant to Section 73.1015 of the Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 73.1015, could lead to the imposition of a monetary forfeiture pursuant to 47 U.S.C. § 503(b), license revocation pursuant to 47 U.S.C. § 312 and/or criminal sanctions under 18 U.S.C. § 1001. In relying on
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-258A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-258A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-258A1.txt
  • entered into discussions concerning the sale of ALLTEL only with Verizon Wireless, and failed to seek and consider investment or partnership alternatives with rural operators. Discussion. Applicants' and licensees' truthfulness and candor before the Commission, as well as their compliance with its rules, are paramount concerns in determining whether they should acquire licenses or continue to hold existing authorizations. Section 1.17 of the Commission's Rules prohibits misrepresentations and lack of candor in Commission filings. Misrepresentations are false statements of fact made with an intent to deceive, while lack of candor involves concealment, evasion, and other failures to be fully informative, also accompanied by deceptive intent. Such intent may be found from the false statement of fact, coupled with proof that the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-09-63A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-09-63A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-09-63A1.txt
  • Order, 20 FCC Rcd at 690, ¶ 33. ESV Order, 20 FCC Rcd at 690, ¶ 33. MTN Petition at 4 & Attachment. See MTN Petition at 4-5. See MTN Petition at 4-5. MTN Petition at 4. MTN Petition at 4. See Intelsat Opposition at 23-24. FWCC Opposition at 3. FWCC Opposition at 3 & n.7 (citing 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.17, 1.52). MTN Reply at 3. See MTN Petition at 3-4. See the International Bureau Provides Guidance Concerning the Notice Requirement for C-band Coordination by Earth Stations on Vessels, Public Notice, DA 05-1671, 20 FCC Rcd 10748 (2005). ESV Order, 20 FCC Rcd at 691-692, ¶ 39. Full-band, full-arc is defined as the entire 1000 megahertz of C-band spectrum, 500 MHz
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-09-63A1_Rcd.pdf
  • objected to ESV operations taking place outside of the coordination agreement. These matters, however, would be handled by the frequency coordinator, or the 107See MTN Petition at 4-5. 108See MTN Petition at 4-5. 109MTN Petition at 4. 110MTN Petition at 4. 111See Intelsat Opposition at 23-24. 112FWCC Opposition at 3. 113FWCC Opposition at 3 & n.7 (citing 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.17, 1.52). 114MTN Reply at 3. 10386 Federal Communications Commission FCC 09-63 Commission, through ordinary complaint procedures, not in response to the Public Notice requirement in Section 25.221(a)(11). Accordingly, we decline to require FS operators to make any specific demonstrations. 44.Thus, when the FS operator informs the Commission that it has been omitted from the coordination, along with specifying the relevant
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-09-97A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-09-97A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-09-97A1.txt
  • 5 FCC Rcd 3252 (1990) (``1990 Character Policy Statement''), Memorandum Opinion and Order, 6 FCC Rcd 3448 (1991), Memorandum Opinion and Order, 7 FCC Rcd 6564 (1992). The Commission applies its broadcast character standards to applicants and licensees in the other radio services. See, e.g., 1990 Character Policy Statement, 5 FCC Rcd at 3253 ¶ 10 (adopting 47 C.F.R. § 1.17 to apply prohibition against misrepresentations and material omissions to applicants, licensees, and permittees in all radio services). See, e.g., Verizon Wireless-ALLTEL Order, 23 FCC Rcd at 17464 ¶ 32; Sprint Nextel-Clearwire Order, 23 FCC Rcd at 17582-83 ¶ 23; Cingular-AT&T Wireless Order, 19 FCC Rcd at 21548 ¶ 47. See, e.g., Verizon Wireless-ALLTEL Order, 23 FCC Rcd at 17464 ¶
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-09-97A1_Rcd.pdf
  • and Order,5 FCC Rcd 3252 (1990) ("1990 Character Policy Statement"), Memorandum Opinion and Order, 6 FCC Rcd 3448 (1991), Memorandum Opinion and Order,7 FCC Rcd 6564 (1992). The Commission applies its broadcast character standards to applicants and licensees in the other radio services. See, e.g., 1990 Character Policy Statement, 5 FCC Rcd at 3253 ¶ 10 (adopting 47 C.F.R. § 1.17 to apply prohibition against misrepresentations and material omissions to applicants, licensees, and permittees in all radio services). 138See, e.g., Verizon Wireless-ALLTEL Order, 23 FCC Rcd at 17464 ¶ 32; Sprint Nextel-Clearwire Order, 23 FCC Rcd at 17582-83 ¶23; Cingular-AT&T Wireless Order, 19 FCC Rcd at 21548 ¶ 47. 139See, e.g., Verizon Wireless-ALLTEL Order, 23 FCC Rcd at 17464 ¶ 32;
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-116A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-116A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-116A1.txt
  • 5 FCC Rcd 3252 (1990) (``1990 Character Policy Statement''), Memorandum Opinion and Order, 6 FCC Rcd 3448 (1991), Memorandum Opinion and Order, 7 FCC Rcd 6564 (1992). The Commission applies its broadcast character standards to applicants and licensees in the other radio services. See, e.g., 1990 Character Policy Statement, 5 FCC Rcd at 3253 ¶ 10 (adopting 47 C.F.R. § 1.17 to apply prohibition against misrepresentations and material omissions to applicants, licensees, and permittees in all radio services). See, e.g., AT&T-Centennial Order, 24 FCC Rcd at 13930 ¶ 32; Verizon Wireless-ALLTEL Order, 23 FCC Rcd at 17464 ¶ 32; Sprint Nextel-Clearwire Order, 23 FCC Rcd at 17582-83 ¶ 23; Cingular-AT&T Wireless Order, 19 FCC Rcd at 21548 ¶ 47. See, e.g.,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-116A1_Rcd.pdf
  • unresolved" and "the Commission cannot grant the applications."118The Commission, however, has previously considered and rejected CAPCC's arguments with respect to foreign ownership of Verizon Wireless in the Verizon Wireless-ALLTEL Order.119Based on information Verizon Wireless submitted for the record (Continued from previous page) services. See, e.g., 1990 Character Policy Statement, 5 FCC Rcd at 3253 ¶ 10 (adopting 47 C.F.R. § 1.17 to apply prohibition against misrepresentations and material omissions to applicants, licensees, and permittees in all radio services). 113See, e.g., AT&T-Centennial Order, 24 FCC Rcd at 13930 ¶ 32; Verizon Wireless-ALLTEL Order, 23 FCC Rcd at 17464 ¶ 32; Sprint Nextel-Clearwire Order, 23 FCC Rcd at 17582-83 ¶23; Cingular-AT&TWireless Order, 19 FCC Rcd at 21548 ¶ 47. 114See, e.g., AT&T-Centennial Order,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-118A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-118A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-118A1.txt
  • we note that in response to Section V(2) of FCC Form 340 (``pending applications''), numerous applicants neglected to list applications filed during the October 2007, filing window, as directed. We, however, caution CARE to be attentive to its application certifications in the future because a false statement, even absent an intent to deceive, may constitute an actionable violation of Section 1.17 of the Rules. 47 C.F.R. § 1.17. See GFSC, Samsno, NHU, CFI, and Calvary Modesto Applications, Questions III(1), III(2), and associated exhibits. GFSC claims that it would provide aggregated first and second NCE service to 13,595 of the 49,941 people encompassed within its 60 dBu contour; Samsno to 13,581 of the 41,922 people; NHU to 10,848 of the 40,204 people;
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-147A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-147A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-147A1.txt
  • show the existence of intent to deceive, even if there is no direct evidence of a motive. Floyd's apparent repeated failure to disclose his felony conviction in three filings with the Commission raises very serious questions whether he misrepresented material facts to, and/or was lacking in candor in his dealings with, the Commission, in willful and/or repeated violation of Section 1.17 of the Commission's Rules. The mere existence of an inaccuracy in any application, without any indication that there was intentional deception, is insufficient to justify consideration of a misrepresentation or lack of candor issue in an evidentiary hearing. In this case, however, as set forth above, Floyd failed to disclose his felony conviction in response to a direct question in
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-46A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-46A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-46A1.txt
  • No. 96-86, Declaratory Ruling on Reporting Requirement Under Commission's Part 1 Anti-Collusion Rule, WT Docket No. 07-166, Second Report and Order, 22 FCC Rcd 15289, 15348-55 ¶¶153-175 (2007) (subsequent history omitted). See 47 C.F.R. § 1.946(d) (``notification[s] must be filed with Commission within 15 days of the expiration of the applicable construction or coverage period''). See, e.g., 47 C.F.R. § 1.17 (Truthful and accurate statements to the Commission); 47 C.F.R. § 1.917(c) (``[w]illful false statements . . . are punishable by fine and imprisonment, 18 U.S.C. 1001, and by appropriate administrative sanctions, including revocation of station license pursuant to 312(a)(1) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended''). 47 C.F.R. § 1.1200 et seq. See id. § 1.1206(b)(2). Id. § 1.1206(b).
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-46A1_Rcd.pdf
  • 07-293. In completing the transmittal screen, filers should include their full name, U.S. Postal Service mailing address, and the applicable docket number. Parties may also submit an electronic comment by Internet e-mail. 5See47 C.F.R. § 1.946(d) ("notification[s] must be filed with Commission within 15 days of the expiration of the applicable construction or coverage period"). 6See, e.g., 47 C.F.R. § 1.17 (Truthful and accurate statements to the Commission); 47 C.F.R. § 1.917(c) ("[w]illful false statements . . . are punishable by fine and imprisonment, 18 U.S.C. 1001, and by appropriate administrative sanctions, including revocation of station license pursuant to 312(a)(1) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended"). 3451 Paper Filers: Parties who choose to file by paper must file an
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-54A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-54A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-54A1.txt
  • 1.937 of the Commission's Rules Concerning Repetitious or Conflicting Applications, Report and Order, 18 FCC Rcd 7190, 7190 ¶ 1 (2003). Id. at 7192-93 ¶¶ 4-6. Id. at 7192 ¶ 5. Consortium-Telesaurus Opposition to Application for Review at 21. Id. at 22-25. NUSCO Opposition to Application for Review at 5-10. Id. at 10. See also id. at 7 n.22. Section 1.17 of the Commission's rules prohibits misrepresentations and lack of candor in Commission filings. 47 C.F.R. § 1.17. Misrepresentations are false statements of fact made with an intent to deceive, while lack of candor involves concealment, evasion, and other failures to be fully informative accompanied by deceptive intent. Fox River Broadcasting, Inc., Order, 93 F.C.C. 2d 127, 129 ¶ 6 (1983).
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-54A1_Rcd.pdf
  • its claim that the results of Auction 57 should be set aside or its assertion that in the future we should deny other parties an opportunity to participate in the same auction solely because they are commonly controlled. We therefore deny PSI's Application for Review. 194NUSCO Opposition to Application for Reviewat 5-10. 195Id.at 10. See also id. at 7 n.22.Section 1.17 of the Commission's rules prohibits misrepresentations and lack of candor in Commission filings. 47 C.F.R. § 1.17. Misrepresentations arefalse statements of fact made with an intent to deceive, while lack of candorinvolves concealment, evasion, and other failures to be fully informative accompanied bydeceptive intent. Fox River Broadcasting, Inc., Order, 93 F.C.C. 2d 127, 129 ¶ 6(1983). 196NUSCO Opposition to Motion
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-82A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-82A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-82A1.txt
  • at 3-4 (filed April 21, 2010). See AT&T Inc. and BellSouth Corporation; Application for Transfer of Control, WC Docket No. 06-74, Memorandum Opinion and Order, 22 FCC Rcd 5662, 5816 (2007). See 47 C.F.R. § 1.946(d) (``notification[s] must be filed with Commission within 15 days of the expiration of the applicable construction or coverage period''). See, e.g., 47 C.F.R. § 1.17 (Truthful and accurate statements to the Commission); 47 C.F.R. § 1.917(c) (``[w]illful false statements . . . are punishable by fine and imprisonment, 18 U.S.C. 1001, and by appropriate administrative sanctions, including revocation of station license pursuant to 312(a)(1) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended''). After a review of the record, we are persuaded that it is unnecessary
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-82A1_Rcd.pdf
  • a licensee has not met its requirements 526See AT&T Inc. and BellSouth Corporation; Application for Transfer of Control, WC Docket No. 06-74, Memorandum Opinion and Order, 22 FCC Rcd 5662, 5816 (2007). 527See47 C.F.R. § 1.946(d) ("notification[s] must be filed with Commission within 15 days of the expiration of the applicable construction or coverage period"). 528See, e.g., 47 C.F.R. § 1.17 (Truthful and accurate statements to the Commission); 47 C.F.R. § 1.917(c) ("[w]illful false statements . . . are punishable by fine and imprisonment, 18 U.S.C. 1001, and by appropriate administrative sanctions, including revocation of station license pursuant to 312(a)(1) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended"). 529After a review of the record, we are persuaded that it is unnecessary
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10J-3A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10J-3A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10J-3A1.txt
  • of the Joint Board, an additional eligibility criterion based on income level. This criterion is mandatory for federal default states, but optional for other states. Specifically, the Commission adopted the income-based standard of 135 percent of the FPG. The Commission adopted this standard for two main reasons: (1) Commission staff analysis projected that an income-based criterion would result in approximately 1.17 million to 1.29 million new Lifeline/Link Up subscribers of which roughly one in five would be new subscribers to telephone service; and (2) existing low-income subscribers would more easily be able to maintain their service. In the 2010 Referral Order, the Commission asked the Joint Board ``to undertake a thorough review of the existing consumer eligibility requirements, as well as
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-103A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-103A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-103A1.txt
  • T-Mobile 868 311 92% 719 134 93% Verizon Wireless 877 434 92% 1075 116 76% Source: PCWorld . Table C-8: Laptop-Based Tests: National Network Performance Results PCMag June 2010 Provider Average Download Speed (Mbps) Average Upload Speed (Mbps) Consistency AT&T 1.79 0.28 86.20% Cricket* 0.94 0.34 95.32% Sprint Nextel ``3G'' 0.99 0.30 95.90% Sprint Nextel ``4G''** 2.11 0.40 84.27% T-Mobile 1.17 0.34 92.78% Verizon Wireless 1.01 0.35 88.22% Source: PCMag.com *Cricket available in ten of 18 cities. **Sprint Nextel ``4G'' available in nine of 18 cities. . Table C-9: Download and Upload Rates in kbps for Data Networks Smartphone-Based Tests by RootMetrics August-September 2010 AT&T Sprint T-Mobile Verizon Chicago Down 422 245 430 329 Up 368 182 300 285 Dallas Down
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-103A1_Rcd.pdf
  • testing methodology used by PCWorld and Novarum is available at http://www.pcworld.com/article/189592- 7/atandt_roars_back_in_pcworlds_second_3g_wireless_performance_test.html. 9927 Federal Communications Commission FCC 11-103 Table C-8: Laptop-Based Tests: National Network Performance Results PCMag June 2010 Provider Average Download Speed (Mbps) Average Upload Speed (Mbps) Consistency AT&T 1.79 0.28 86.20% Cricket* 0.94 0.34 95.32% Sprint Nextel "3G" 0.99 0.30 95.90% Sprint Nextel "4G"** 2.11 0.40 84.27% T-Mobile 1.17 0.34 92.78% Verizon Wireless 1.01 0.35 88.22% Source: PCMag.com *Cricket available in ten of 18 cities. **Sprint Nextel "4G" available in nine of 18 cities. Notes: In June 2010, PCMag.com published data from laptop-based network performance tests conducted in 18 cities on the HSPA/EV-DO networks of the four nationwide providers, as well as Cricketand "Sprint 4G" where available. The study
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-118A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-118A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-118A1.txt
  • by OMB. See VRS Practices R&O, 26 FCC Rcd at 5585-87, ¶¶ 88-91; id. at 5610-11 (codifying rule at 47 C.F.R. § 64.604(c)(5)(iii)(C)(5)). See 2010 VRS Declaratory Ruling, Order, and NPRM, 25 FCC Rcd at 6018-20, ¶¶ 11-16; 6038, App. B. VRS Practices R&O, 26 FCC Rcd at 5586, ¶ 90 (citing 47 C.F.R. § 1.16). See 47 C.F.R. § 1.17. See VRS Practices R&O, 26 FCC Rcd at 5586, ¶ 90. We note that the Commission's rules require similar certifications in other application and report contexts. See, e.g., 47 C.F.R. § 1.2105 (requiring applicants for eligibility to bid in Commission auctions to make various certifications under penalty of perjury, including, for instance, identifying all parties with whom the applicant has
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-161A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-161A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-161A1.txt
  • -0.476 (-1.59) (0.51) (1.12) (-0.04) (0.56) (-1.95) (0.38) (0.50) (-0.84) (0.9 7) (-3.12) (-0.79) Percent_Water 0.905** -0.0899 -0.825 -1.349 0.167 -0.260 0.654 1.685* 0.375 -0.762 -0 .166 0.131 (3.00) (-0.21) (-0.73) (-0.94) (0.20) (-0.59) (0.84) (2.08) (0.76) (-1. 19) (-0.21) (0.07) Census_Blocs_nu 0.178** 0.192* 0.301 0.232 0.0850 0.126 -0.107 0.192 0.1 40 0.0200 0.0809 -0.352 (2.95) (1.99) (1.71) (0.98) (0.82) (1.17) (-0.75) (1.02) (1.63) (0.16) (0.85) (-1.06) Census_Blocs_uc -0.215* -0.279* -0.319 -0.406 0.0452 -0.0284 0.00157 -0. 247 -0.162 -0.164 -0.271 -0.241 (-2.23) (-2.29) (-0.83) (-0.80) (0.28) (-0.19) (0.01) (-0.90) (-1.01) ( -0.94) (-1.39) (-0.50) Census_Blocs_ua 0.163 -0.0922 -0.701 -0.0939 -0.173 0.344 0.0371 0.314 - 0.0927 -0.276 0.539** 0.930 (1.45) (-0.34) (-1.24) (-0.10) (-0.47) (1.91) (0.19) (0.57) (-0.58) (-0 .84) (3.22) (1.03)
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-182A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-182A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-182A1.txt
  • See RP § 7.3.2. But see para. 30 and note 140 (stations and MVPDs can comply with the RP by ensuring the loudness of embedded commercials is controlled by real-time processing, rather than through cooperation with program providers, but rarely do so). See infra, para. 30. See DIRECTV and DISH Network Ex Parte (October 27, 2011). See 47 C.F.R. § 1.17. Appendix A, Final Rules (47 C.F.R. § 73.682(e)(2)(iv), § 76.607(a)(2)(iv); § 73.682(e)(3), § 76.607(a)(3); 47 C.F.R. § 73.682(e)(5)(ii), § 76.607(a)(5)(ii); 47 C.F.R. § 73.682(e)(6), § 76.607(a)(6)). As discussed above, stations and MVPDs not deemed in compliance must also demonstrate actual compliance with the RP. See supra para. 22. NCTA Ex Parte Comment (October 18, 2011). See supra para. 23. 47
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-67A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-67A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-67A1.txt
  • we note that in response to Section V(2) of FCC Form 340 (``pending applications''), other applicants neglected to list applications filed during the February 2010, filing window, as directed. We, however, caution CCAC to be attentive to its application certifications in the future because a false statement, even absent an intent to deceive, may constitute an actionable violation of Section 1.17 of the Rules. 47 C.F.R. § 1.17. See MPLC, RBI, OVN, Crossroads, CCVA, CCT, HFCN, and SHRCP Applications, Questions III(1), III(2), and associated exhibits. MPLC claims that it would provide aggregated first and second NCE service to 26,531 of the 253,969 people encompassed within its proposed 60 dBu contour; RBI to 26,914 of the 267,036 people; OVN to 16,136 of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-99A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-99A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-99A1.txt
  • in response to Question V(2) of FCC Form 340 (``pending applications''), other applicants neglected to list applications filed during the October 2007 and February 2010, filing windows, as directed. We caution Guild, however, to be attentive to its application certifications in the future because a false statement, even absent an intent to deceive, may constitute an actionable violation of Section 1.17 of the Rules. 47 C.F.R. § 1.17. See BRBC, WCU, NOG, Toccoa, and Canary Applications, Questions III(1), III(2), and associated exhibits. BRBC claims that it would provide aggregated first and second NCE service to 59,568 of the 67,412 people encompassed within its proposed 60 dBu contour; WCU to 62,158 of the 73,800 people; NOG to 47,812 of the 49,784 people;
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-12-32A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-12-32A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-12-32A1.txt
  • to compete in the U.S. wireless business. As a result we would need to evaluate the carrying value of these assets.''). ). ). See, e.g., 27 C.F.R. §§ 27.14(a), (j), (o). See 47 C.F.R. § 1.946(d) (``notification[s] must be filed with Commission within 15 days of the expiration of the applicable construction or coverage period''). See, e.g., 47 C.F.R. § 1.17 (Truthful and accurate statements to the Commission); 47 C.F.R. § 1.917(c) (``Willful false statements . . . are punishable by fine and imprisonment, 18 U.S.C. 1001, and by appropriate administrative sanctions, including revocation of station license pursuant to 312(a)(1) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended.''). 47 C.F.R. § 2.106. Part 27 licensees must also comply with other Commission
• http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Cable/Orders/1999/fcc99024.doc http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Cable/Orders/1999/fcc99024.txt http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Cable/Orders/1999/fcc99024.wp
  • the Commission that it intends to provide residential local exchange service in the foreseeable Ä Hearing at 183, ll. 2(c)5 (AT&T ÔSr. Vice President for Government Affairs and Federal Policy stating: "Simply put, this merger represents AT&T's Ä Hearing at 17 Ô(AT&T's Chairman stating: "This merger means most importantly local phone competition for residential customers"); AT&T(c)TCI Reply at 11(c)13. À 1.17. Although AT&T has acknowledged in a recent proxy statement that there is a "risk" that Ôit will not deploy local telephone service, the company did state affirmatively its intention to deploy local telephone Ôservice. Merger Proxy Statement at 21. In light of information directly supplied to the Commission by AT&T, Ôas well as the level of investment the company is
• http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Notices/1999/fcc99120.pdf http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Notices/1999/fcc99120.txt http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Notices/1999/fcc99120.wp
  • defaults include a multiplier to estimate the additional cost of the filling compound used in buried cable to protect the cable from moisture.148 For underground Federal Communications Commission FCC 99-120 149 HAI Inputs Portfolio at 24. 150 See supra note 128. 151 An earlier version of HCPM calculated 24-gauge copper cable by multiplying the values for 26-gauge copper cable by 1.17. See HCPM Dec. 15, 1998 model description at 19. 152 Letter from Chris Frentrup, MCI Worldcom, to Magalie Roman Salas, FCC, dated Feb. 9, 1999 (MCI Feb. 9, 1999 ex parte). 31 cable, HAI adds a per foot material cost for the conduit material.149 68. We tentatively conclude that we should adopt separate input values for the cost of aerial,
• http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1998/fcc98225.pdf http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1998/fcc98225.txt http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1998/fcc98225.wp
  • claim as speculative. Applicants maintain instead that these savings will occur because MCI will have use of WorldCom's existing local facilities and will avoid duplicative capital and operating expenditures. As a result, according to WorldCom and MCI, planned expansion into residential Federal Communications Commission FCC 98-225 540 WorldCom/MCI Jan. 26 Reply Comments at 11, 20-21. 541 See 47 C.F.R. § 1.17. 542 Bell Atlantic/NYNEX Order, 12 FCC Rcd at 20063, para. 157. 543 WorldCom/MCI Jan. 26 Reply Comments at 6-7. 544 Id. at 6. See Letter from Jean L. Kiddoo, Counsel to WorldCom, Swidler & Berlin, to Magalie Roman Salas, Secretary, FCC, Attach. "Presentation on Local Services" at 2, 3, 10, 11 (filed July 1, 1998) (WorldCom July 1 Ex Parte)
• http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/fcc01029.doc http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/fcc01029.pdf http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/fcc01029.txt
  • 271-No. 43a-b and 271-No. 45a-b. See SWBT Aggregated Performance Data, Measurement No. 29-04, Kansas and Oklahoma, (``Percent SWBT Caused Missed Due Dates-No Field Work-Business-POTS - Resale''), at 271-No. 29-a. In Oklahoma, the disparity was 0.01 percent in July, 0.65 percent in August, 0.43 percent in September and 1.20 percent in October. In Kansas, the disparity was 0.09 percent in July, 1.17 percent in August, 0.78 percent in September and 3.32 percent in October. See SWBT Aggregated Performance Data, Measurement Nos. 27-01 to 27-04, 29-01 to 29-04, 43-01 to 43-08, and 45-01 to 45-08, Texas, at 271-No. 27a, 271-No. 29-a, 271-No. 43a-b and 271-No. 45a-b. SWBT's only disparities were in Measurement No. 29-02 (disparity of 0.80 percent in August and 0.42 percent
• http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Enforcement/News_Releases/2001/nren0124.html http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Enforcement/News_Releases/2001/nren0124.pdf http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Enforcement/News_Releases/2001/nren0124.txt
  • Commission. The Commission also found that SBC's loop qualification system, as it operated when the Commission approved the Kansas/Oklahoma application, did not violate section 271 of the Communications Act. Based on its investigation, however, the Commission did find that SBC appears to be liable for other apparent violations. Specifically, the Commission found that: 1. SBC appears to have violated section 1.17 of the Commission's Rules by intentionally misrepresenting information to the Enforcement Bureau during the investigation. The Commission proposed a fine of $120,000 for this apparent violation. 2. SBC appears to have violated section 1.65 of the Commission's Rules when it failed to notify the Commission in a timely manner that the information in the affidavits was inaccurate. For this, the
• http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Enforcement/Orders/2001/fcc01308.pdf http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Enforcement/Orders/2001/fcc01308.txt
  • section 1.65 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.65; (2) apparently making a misrepresentation or a willful material omission bearing on a matter within the jurisdiction of the Commission in a written statement submitted by SBC in connection with the investigation into the filing of the incorrect affidavits in the Kansas/Oklahoma section 271 proceeding, in apparent violation of section 1.17 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.17; and (3) apparently failing to comply with the terms of a consent decree that resolved an earlier investigation of SBC involving analogous issues and required SBC to train certain employees on Commission rules relating to contacts with the agency.2 3. Based on these findings, we find SBC apparently liable for a forfeiture
• http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Orders/1997/fcc97303.pdf http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Orders/1997/fcc97303.txt http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Orders/1997/fcc97303.wp
  • An exhaustive record of all possible exposure locations is not necessary, but, for example, the "worst case" exposure value in an accessible area could be mentioned as showing that no exposures would ever be greater than that level. Reference should be given to the actual FCC exposure limit or limits relevant for the particular transmitting site. 206See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.17 and 1.52. 62 Federal Communications Commission FCC 97-303 (3) An explanation as to what, if any, restrictions on access to certain areas will be maintained to ensure compliance with the public or occupational exposure limits. This includes control procedures that are established for workers who may be exposed as a result of maintenance or other tasks related to their jobs.
• http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Notices/1998/fcc98057.pdf http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Notices/1998/fcc98057.wp
  • any expenses for services rendered by any of its principals and that there are no consulting or future employment agreements between the permittee and the assignee that are part of the consideration for assignment of the permit to the proposed assignee. The Commission would continue to have the authority to Federal Communications Commission FCC 98-57 50 See 47 C.F.R. § 1.17 ("The Commission or its representatives may, in writing, require from any applicant, permittee or licensee written statements of fact relevant to a determination whether an application should be granted or denied, or to a determination of whether a license should be revoked, or to some other matter within the jurisdiction of the Commission."). 51 47 C.F.R. § 73.3613(b). 52 We
• http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Orders/1998/fcc98281.pdf
  • without considering specific antenna information such as make, model, and size. Elimination of the requirement to file this information would provide applicants maximum flexibility in choosing an antenna manufacturer when constructing a facility. Should the absence of definitive information concerning a specific directional antenna preclude grant of a construction permit Federal Communications Commission FCC 98-281 97 See 47 C.F.R. § 1.17 (the Commission or its representatives may require from any applicant, permittee or licensee written statements of fact relevant to a determination whether an application should be granted). 98 See, e.g., Comments of NAB at 13; Cohen, Dippell and Everist, P.C. at 3; CBS at 5; Independent Broadcast Consultants, Inc. at 22. 99 See Comments of NAB at 13. 100 See,
• http://transition.fcc.gov/Reports/fcc2008budget_complete.pdf
  • for the Commission. The various conference agenda items have been initially assigned to the informal working groups as follows: Informal Working Groups (IWG) Agenda Items (Major WRC-07 Issues) IWG-1 ­ Terrestrial and Space Science Services 1.2, 1.3, 1.5, 1.14, 1.16, & 1.20 IWG-2 ­ Satellite Services including those related to High Altitude Platform Stations (HAPS) 1.6 (Resolution 415), 1.7, 1.8, 1.17, 1.18, 1.19, & 1.21) IWG-3 ­ International Mobile Telephone (IMT-2000) & 2.5 GHz 1.4 & 1.9 IWG-4 ­ Broadcasting and Amateur Services 1.6 (Resolution 414), 1.11, 1.13, 1.15, & 7.1 (Recommendation 952) IWG-5 ­ Regulatory Issues 1.1, 1.0, 1.12, 2, 3, 5, 6, & 7.1) MEDIA At the end of FY 2006, a total of 1,586 of 1,687 licensed DTV
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/AmateurActions/files/Diaz-09_10_19_5117.html http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/AmateurActions/files/Diaz-09_10_19_5117.pdf
  • Juan Field Office South Central Regional Director The Commission sent you a second letter on August 17, 2009, notifying you that you had failed to respond to the Commission's initial letter of inquiry and directing you to respond to this office within 14 days of receipt of that second letter. See 18 U.S.C. S: 1001; see also 47 C.F.R. S: 1.17. References 1. http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/AmateurActions/files/Diaz-09_10_19_5117.pdf
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/AmateurActions/files/couns09_08_21_5112.html http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/AmateurActions/files/couns09_08_21_5112.pdf
  • material fact with respect to your original application incorrectly stating that you were a "former holder" of the call sign in question. Please call me at (717) 338-2577 if you have any questions about this matter. Sincerely, Laura L. Smith Special Counsel Cc: Dallas Field Office South Central Regional Director See 18 U.S.C. S: 1001; see also 47 C.F.R. S: 1.17. References 1. http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/AmateurActions/files/couns09_08_21_5112.pdf
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/AmateurActions/files/flowe09_10_19_5134.html http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/AmateurActions/files/flowe09_10_19_5134.pdf
  • material fact with respect to your original application incorrectly stating that you were a "former holder" of the call sign in question. Please call me at (717) 338-2577 if you have any questions about this matter. Sincerely, Laura L. Smith Special Counsel Cc: Norfolk Field Office South Central Regional Director See 18 U.S.C. S: 1001; see also 47 C.F.R. S: 1.17. References 1. http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/AmateurActions/files/flowe09_10_19_5134.pdf
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/AmateurActions/files/lopez09_08_21_5113.html http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/AmateurActions/files/lopez09_08_21_5113.pdf
  • fact with respect to your original application incorrectly stating that you were a "former holder" of the call sign in question. Please call me at (717) 338-2577 if you have any questions about this matter. Sincerely, Laura L. Smith Special Counsel Cc: San Juan Field Office South Central Regional Director See 18 U.S.C. S: 1001; see also 47 C.F.R. S: 1.17. References 1. http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/AmateurActions/files/lopez09_08_21_5113.pdf
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/AmateurActions/files/stock09_08_21_5114.html http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/AmateurActions/files/stock09_08_21_5114.pdf
  • a material fact with respect to your original application incorrectly stating that you were a "former holder" of the call sign in question. Please call me at (717) 338-2577 if you have any questions about this matter. Sincerely, Laura L. Smith Special Counsel Cc: Portland Field Office Western Regional Director See 18 U.S.C. S: 1001; see also 47 C.F.R. S: 1.17. References 1. http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/AmateurActions/files/stock09_08_21_5114.pdf
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-260117A1.html
  • financial status. Any claim of inability to pay must specifically identify the basis for the claim by reference to the financial documentation submitted. 1.16. Requests for payment of the full amount of this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture under an installment plan should be sent to: Chief, Revenue and Receivable Operation Group, 445 12th Street, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20554.14 1.17. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT this NOTICE OF APPARENT LIABILITY shall be sent, by Certified Mail, Return Receipt Requested to Farmworkers Educational Radio Network Inc. at its address of record. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION William R. Zears, Jr. District Director San Diego Office Western Region Enforcement Bureau _________________________ 147 C.F.R. 11.35. 247 U.S.C. 503(b). 3Section 312(f)(1) of the Act, 47 U.S.C.
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-282148A1.html
  • determine what, if any, enforcement action is required to ensure compliance. Any false statement made knowingly and willfully in reply to this Notice is punishable by fine or imprisonment under Title 18 of the U.S. Code. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Thomas N. Van Stavern District Director San Francisco District Office Western Region Enforcement Bureau 47 C.F.R. S: 1.89. 47 C.F.R. S: 1.17. 47 U.S.C. S: 403. P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. S: 552a(e)(3). 18 U.S.C. S: 1001 et seq. Federal Communications Commission 2 Federal Communications Commission References 1. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-282148A1.pdf 2. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-282148A1.doc
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-283331A1.html
  • determine what, if any, enforcement action is required to ensure compliance. Any false statement made knowingly and willfully in reply to this Notice is punishable by fine or imprisonment under Title 18 of the U.S. Code. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Thomas N. Van Stavern District Director San Francisco District Office Western Region Enforcement Bureau 47 C.F.R. S: 1.89. 47 C.F.R. S: 1.17. 47 U.S.C. S: 403. P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. S: 552a(e)(3). 18 U.S.C. S: 1001 et seq. Federal Communications Commission 2 Federal Communications Commission References 1. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-283331A1.pdf 2. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-283331A1.doc
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-283332A1.html
  • reply, to determine what, if any, enforcement action is required to ensure compliance. Any false statement made knowingly and willfully in reply to this Notice is punishable by fine or imprisonment under Title 18 of the U.S. Code. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Thomas N. VanStavern District Director San Francisco Office Western Region Enforcement Bureau 47 C.F.R. S: 1.89. 47 C.F.R. S: 1.17. 47 U.S.C. S: 403. P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. S: 552a(e)(3). 18 U.S.C. S: 1001 et seq. Federal Communications Commission 3 Federal Communications Commission References 1. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-283332A1.pdf 2. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-283332A1.doc
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-283656A1.html
  • to determine what, if any, enforcement action is required to ensure compliance. Any false statement made knowingly and willfully in reply to this Notice is punishable by fine or imprisonment under Title 18 of the U.S. Code. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION James D. Wells District Director Dallas District Office South Central Region Enforcement Bureau 47 C.F.R. S: 1.89. 47 C.F.R. S: 1.17. 47 U.S.C. S: 308(b). P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. S: 552a(e)(3). 18 U.S.C. S: 1001 et seq. Federal Communications Commission 2 Federal Communications Commission References 1. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-283656A1.pdf 2. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-283656A1.doc
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-286436A1.html
  • determine what, if any, enforcement action is required to ensure compliance. Any false statement made knowingly and willfully in reply to this Notice is punishable by fine or imprisonment under Title 18 of the U.S. Code. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Thomas N. Van Stavern District Director San Francisco District Office Western Region Enforcement Bureau 47 C.F.R. S: 1.89. 47 C.F.R. S: 1.17. 47 U.S.C. S: 403. P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. S: 552a(e)(3). 18 U.S.C. S: 1001 et seq. Federal Communications Commission 2 Federal Communications Commission References 1. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-286436A1.pdf 2. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-286436A1.doc
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-286437A1.html
  • determine what, if any, enforcement action is required to ensure compliance. Any false statement made knowingly and willfully in reply to this Notice is punishable by fine or imprisonment under Title 18 of the U.S. Code. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Thomas N. Van Stavern District Director San Francisco District Office Western Region Enforcement Bureau 47 C.F.R. S: 1.89. 47 C.F.R. S: 1.17. 47 U.S.C. S: 403. P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. S: 552a(e)(3). 18 U.S.C. S: 1001 et seq. Federal Communications Commission 2 Federal Communications Commission References 1. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-286437A1.pdf 2. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-286437A1.doc
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-286913A1.html
  • determine what, if any, enforcement action is required to ensure compliance. Any false statement made knowingly and willfully in reply to this Notice is punishable by fine or imprisonment under Title 18 of the U.S. Code. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Margaret Egler Acting Interim District Director Los Angeles District Office Western Region Enforcement Bureau 47 C.F.R. S: 1.89. 47 C.F.R. S: 1.17. 47 U.S.C. S: 403. P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. S: 552a(e)(3). 18 U.S.C. S: 1001 et seq. Federal Communications Commission 2 Federal Communications Commission References 1. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-286913A1.pdf 2. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-286913A1.doc
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-295454A1.html
  • shall be subscribed by the declarant as true under penalty of perjury, and dated, in substantially the following form . . . : `I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on (date). (Signature)'." 47 C.F.R. S: 1.16. 18 U.S.C. S: 1001 et seq. See also 47 C.F.R. S: 1.17. P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. S: 552a(e)(3). Federal Communications Commission 3 Federal Communications Commission References 1. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295454A1.pdf 2. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295454A1.doc
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-295455A1.html
  • shall be subscribed by the declarant as true under penalty of perjury, and dated, in substantially the following form . . . : `I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on (date). (Signature)'." 47 C.F.R. S: 1.16. 18 U.S.C. S: 1001 et seq. See also 47 C.F.R. S: 1.17. P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. S: 552a(e)(3). Federal Communications Commission 3 Federal Communications Commission References 1. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295455A1.pdf 2. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295455A1.doc
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-295456A1.html
  • shall be subscribed by the declarant as true under penalty of perjury, and dated, in substantially the following form . . . : `I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on (date). (Signature)'." 47 C.F.R. S: 1.16. 18 U.S.C. S: 1001 et seq. See also 47 C.F.R. S: 1.17. P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. S: 552a(e)(3). Federal Communications Commission 3 Federal Communications Commission References 1. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295456A1.pdf 2. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295456A1.doc
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-295457A1.html
  • shall be subscribed by the declarant as true under penalty of perjury, and dated, in substantially the following form . . . : `I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on (date). (Signature)'." 47 C.F.R. S: 1.16. 18 U.S.C. S: 1001 et seq. See also 47 C.F.R. S: 1.17. P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. S: 552a(e)(3). Federal Communications Commission 3 Federal Communications Commission References 1. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295457A1.pdf 2. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295457A1.doc
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-295458A1.html
  • shall be subscribed by the declarant as true under penalty of perjury, and dated, in substantially the following form . . . : `I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on (date). (Signature)'." 47 C.F.R. S: 1.16. 18 U.S.C. S: 1001 et seq. See also 47 C.F.R. S: 1.17. P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. S: 552a(e)(3). Federal Communications Commission 3 Federal Communications Commission References 1. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295458A1.pdf 2. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295458A1.doc
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-295595A1.html
  • shall be subscribed by the declarant as true under penalty of perjury, and dated, in substantially the following form . . . : `I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on (date). (Signature)'." 47 C.F.R. S: 1.16. 18 U.S.C. S: 1001 et seq. See also 47 C.F.R. S: 1.17. P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. S: 552a(e)(3). Federal Communications Commission 4 Federal Communications Commission References 1. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295595A1.pdf 2. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295595A1.doc
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-295629A1.html
  • shall be subscribed by the declarant as true under penalty of perjury, and dated, in substantially the following form . . . : `I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on (date). (Signature)'." 47 C.F.R. S: 1.16. 18 U.S.C. S: 1001 et seq. See also 47 C.F.R. S: 1.17. P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. S: 552a(e)(3). Federal Communications Commission 3 Federal Communications Commission References 1. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295629A1.pdf 2. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295629A1.doc
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-295634A1.html
  • shall be subscribed by the declarant as true under penalty of perjury, and dated, in substantially the following form . . . : `I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on (date). (Signature)'." 47 C.F.R. S: 1.16. 18 U.S.C. S: 1001 et seq. See also 47 C.F.R. S: 1.17. P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. S: 552a(e)(3). Federal Communications Commission 3 Federal Communications Commission References 1. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295634A1.pdf 2. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295634A1.doc
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-295635A1.html
  • shall be subscribed by the declarant as true under penalty of perjury, and dated, in substantially the following form . . . : `I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on (date). (Signature)'." 47 C.F.R. S: 1.16. 18 U.S.C. S: 1001 et seq. See also 47 C.F.R. S: 1.17. P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. S: 552a(e)(3). Federal Communications Commission 2 Federal Communications Commission References 1. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295635A1.pdf 2. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295635A1.doc
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-295637A1.html
  • shall be subscribed by the declarant as true under penalty of perjury, and dated, in substantially the following form . . . : `I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on (date). (Signature)'." 47 C.F.R. S: 1.16. 18 U.S.C. S: 1001 et seq. See also 47 C.F.R. S: 1.17. P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. S: 552a(e)(3). Federal Communications Commission 2 Federal Communications Commission References 1. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295637A1.pdf 2. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295637A1.doc
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-295639A1.html
  • shall be subscribed by the declarant as true under penalty of perjury, and dated, in substantially the following form . . . : `I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on (date). (Signature)'." 47 C.F.R. S: 1.16. 18 U.S.C. S: 1001 et seq. See also 47 C.F.R. S: 1.17. P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. S: 552a(e)(3). Federal Communications Commission 3 Federal Communications Commission References 1. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295639A1.pdf 2. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295639A1.doc
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-295640A1.html
  • shall be subscribed by the declarant as true under penalty of perjury, and dated, in substantially the following form . . . : `I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on (date). (Signature)'." 47 C.F.R. S: 1.16. 18 U.S.C. S: 1001 et seq. See also 47 C.F.R. S: 1.17. P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. S: 552a(e)(3). Federal Communications Commission 3 Federal Communications Commission References 1. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295640A1.pdf 2. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295640A1.doc
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-295830A1.html
  • shall be subscribed by the declarant as true under penalty of perjury, and dated, in substantially the following form . . . : `I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on (date). (Signature)'." 47 C.F.R. S: 1.16. 18 U.S.C. S: 1001 et seq. See also 47 C.F.R. S: 1.17. P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. S: 552a(e)(3). Federal Communications Commission 3 Federal Communications Commission References 1. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295830A1.pdf 2. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295830A1.doc
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-295831A1.html
  • shall be subscribed by the declarant as true under penalty of perjury, and dated, in substantially the following form . . . : 'I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on (date). (Signature)'." 47 C.F.R. S: 1.16. 18 U.S.C. S: 1001 et seq. See also 47 C.F.R. S: 1.17. P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. S: 552a(e)(3). Federal Communications Commission 3 Federal Communications Commission References 1. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295831A1.pdf 2. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295831A1.doc
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-295833A1.html
  • shall be subscribed by the declarant as true under penalty of perjury, and dated, in substantially the following form . . . : `I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on (date). (Signature)'." 47 C.F.R. S: 1.16. 18 U.S.C. S: 1001 et seq. See also 47 C.F.R. S: 1.17. P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. S: 552a(e)(3). Federal Communications Commission 3 Federal Communications Commission References 1. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295833A1.pdf 2. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295833A1.doc
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-295906A1.html
  • shall be subscribed by the declarant as true under penalty of perjury, and dated, in substantially the following form . . . : `I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on (date). (Signature)'." 47 C.F.R. S: 1.16. 18 U.S.C. S: 1001 et seq. See also 47 C.F.R. S: 1.17. P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. S: 552a(e)(3). Federal Communications Commission 3 Federal Communications Commission References 1. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295906A1.pdf 2. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295906A1.doc
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-295908A1.html
  • shall be subscribed by the declarant as true under penalty of perjury, and dated, in substantially the following form . . . : `I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on (date). (Signature)'." 47 C.F.R. S: 1.16. 18 U.S.C. S: 1001 et seq. See also 47 C.F.R. S: 1.17. P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. S: 552a(e)(3). Federal Communications Commission 2 Federal Communications Commission References 1. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295908A1.pdf 2. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295908A1.doc
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-295909A1.html
  • shall be subscribed by the declarant as true under penalty of perjury, and dated, in substantially the following form . . . : `I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on (date). (Signature)'." 47 C.F.R. S: 1.16. 18 U.S.C. S: 1001 et seq. See also 47 C.F.R. S: 1.17. P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. S: 552a(e)(3). Federal Communications Commission 2 Federal Communications Commission References 1. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295909A1.pdf 2. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295909A1.doc
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-295911A1.html
  • shall be subscribed by the declarant as true under penalty of perjury, and dated, in substantially the following form . . . : `I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on (date). (Signature)'." 47 C.F.R. S: 1.16. 18 U.S.C. S: 1001 et seq. See also 47 C.F.R. S: 1.17. P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. S: 552a(e)(3). Federal Communications Commission 2 Federal Communications Commission References 1. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295911A1.pdf 2. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295911A1.doc
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-295912A1.html
  • in your reply, to determine what, if any, enforcement action is required to ensure compliance. Any false statement made knowingly and willfully in reply to this Notice is punishable by fine or imprisonment under Title 18 of the U.S. Code. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Ryan Hagihara Resident Agent Honolulu Office Western Region Enforcement Bureau 47 C.F.R. S: 1.89. 47 C.F.R. S: 1.17. 47 U.S.C. S: 403. P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. S: 552a(e)(3). 18 U.S.C. S: 1001 et seq. Federal Communications Commission 2 Federal Communications Commission References 1. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295912A1.pdf 2. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295912A1.doc
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-296413A1.html
  • shall be subscribed by the declarant as true under penalty of perjury, and dated, in substantially the following form . . . : `I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on (date). (Signature)'." 47 C.F.R. S: 1.16. 18 U.S.C. S: 1001 et seq. See also 47 C.F.R. S: 1.17. P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. S: 552a(e)(3). Federal Communications Commission 3 Federal Communications Commission References 1. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-296413A1.pdf 2. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-296413A1.doc
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-296418A1.html
  • shall be subscribed by the declarant as true under penalty of perjury, and dated, in substantially the following form . . . : `I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on (date). (Signature)'." 47 C.F.R. S: 1.16. 18 U.S.C. S: 1001 et seq. See also 47 C.F.R. S: 1.17. P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. S: 552a(e)(3). Federal Communications Commission 3 Federal Communications Commission References 1. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-296418A1.pdf 2. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-296418A1.doc
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-296419A1.html
  • shall be subscribed by the declarant as true under penalty of perjury, and dated, in substantially the following form . . . : `I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on (date). (Signature)'." 47 C.F.R. S: 1.16. 18 U.S.C. S: 1001 et seq. See also 47 C.F.R. S: 1.17. P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. S: 552a(e)(3). Federal Communications Commission 3 Federal Communications Commission References 1. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-296419A1.pdf 2. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-296419A1.doc
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-296581A1.html
  • shall be subscribed by the declarant as true under penalty of perjury, and dated, in substantially the following form . . . : `I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on (date). (Signature)'." 47 C.F.R. S: 1.16. 18 U.S.C. S: 1001 et seq. See also 47 C.F.R. S: 1.17. P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. S: 552a(e)(3). 18 U.S.C. S: 1001 et seq. Federal Communications Commission 4 Federal Communications Commission References 1. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-296581A1.pdf 2. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-296581A1.doc
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-296712A1.html
  • shall be subscribed by the declarant as true under penalty of perjury, and dated, in substantially the following form . . . : `I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on (date). (Signature)'." 47 C.F.R. S: 1.16. 18 U.S.C. S: 1001 et seq. See also 47 C.F.R. S: 1.17. P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. S: 552a(e)(3). Federal Communications Commission 2 Federal Communications Commission References 1. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-296712A1.pdf 2. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-296712A1.doc
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-296842A1.html
  • shall be subscribed by the declarant as true under penalty of perjury, and dated, in substantially the following form . . . : `I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on (date). (Signature)'." 47 C.F.R. S: 1.16. 18 U.S.C. S: 1001 et seq. See also 47 C.F.R. S: 1.17. P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. S: 552a(e)(3). Federal Communications Commission 2 Federal Communications Commission References 1. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-296842A1.pdf 2. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-296842A1.doc
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-296847A1.html
  • shall be subscribed by the declarant as true under penalty of perjury, and dated, in substantially the following form . . . : `I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on (date). (Signature)'." 47 C.F.R. S: 1.16. 18 U.S.C. S: 1001 et seq. See also 47 C.F.R. S: 1.17. P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. S: 552a(e)(3). Federal Communications Commission 2 Federal Communications Commission References 1. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-296847A1.pdf 2. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-296847A1.doc
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-297322A1.html
  • shall be subscribed by the declarant as true under penalty of perjury, and dated, in substantially the following form . . . : `I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on (date). (Signature)'." 47 C.F.R. S: 1.16. 18 U.S.C. S: 1001 et seq. See also 47 C.F.R. S: 1.17. P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. S: 552a(e)(3). Federal Communications Commission 3 Federal Communications Commission References 1. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-297322A1.pdf 2. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-297322A1.doc
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-298186A1.html
  • shall be subscribed by the declarant as true under penalty of perjury, and dated, in substantially the following form . . . : `I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on (date). (Signature)'." 47 C.F.R. S: 1.16. 18 U.S.C. S: 1001 et seq. See also 47 C.F.R. S: 1.17. P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. S: 552a(e)(3). Federal Communications Commission 2 Federal Communications Commission References 1. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-298186A1.pdf 2. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-298186A1.doc
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-298343A1.html
  • shall be subscribed by the declarant as true under penalty of perjury, and dated, in substantially the following form . . . : `I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on (date). (Signature)'." 47 C.F.R. S: 1.16. 18 U.S.C. S: 1001 et seq. See also 47 C.F.R. S: 1.17. 47 U.S.C. S: 308(b). P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. S: 552a(e)(3). 18 U.S.C. S: 1001 et seq. Federal Communications Commission 3 Federal Communications Commission References 1. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-298343A1.pdf 2. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-298343A1.doc
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-298527A1.html
  • shall be subscribed by the declarant as true under penalty of perjury, and dated, in substantially the following form . . . : `I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on (date). (Signature)'." 47 C.F.R. S: 1.16. 18 U.S.C. S: 1001 et seq. See also 47 C.F.R. S: 1.17. P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. S: 552a(e)(3). Federal Communications Commission 2 Federal Communications Commission References 1. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-298527A1.pdf 2. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-298527A1.doc
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-298637A1.html
  • shall be subscribed by the declarant as true under penalty of perjury, and dated, in substantially the following form . . . : `I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on (date). (Signature)'." 47 C.F.R. S: 1.16. 18 U.S.C. S: 1001 et seq. See also 47 C.F.R. S: 1.17. P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. S: 552a(e)(3). Federal Communications Commission 2 Federal Communications Commission References 1. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-298637A1.pdf 2. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-298637A1.doc
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-298638A1.html
  • shall be subscribed by the declarant as true under penalty of perjury, and dated, in substantially the following form . . . : `I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on (date). (Signature)'." 47 C.F.R. S: 1.16. 18 U.S.C. S: 1001 et seq. See also 47 C.F.R. S: 1.17. P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. S: 552a(e)(3). Federal Communications Commission 3 Federal Communications Commission References 1. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-298638A1.pdf 2. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-298638A1.doc
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-299106A1.html
  • shall be subscribed by the declarant as true under penalty of perjury, and dated, in substantially the following form . . . : `I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on (date). (Signature)'." 47 C.F.R. S: 1.16. 18 U.S.C. S: 1001 et seq. See also 47 C.F.R. S: 1.17. P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. S: 552a(e)(3). Federal Communications Commission 2 Federal Communications Commission References 1. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-299106A1.pdf 2. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-299106A1.doc
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-299107A1.html
  • shall be subscribed by the declarant as true under penalty of perjury, and dated, in substantially the following form . . . : `I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on (date). (Signature)'." 47 C.F.R. S: 1.16. 18 U.S.C. S: 1001 et seq. See also 47 C.F.R. S: 1.17. P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. S: 552a(e)(3). Federal Communications Commission 2 Federal Communications Commission References 1. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-299107A1.pdf 2. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-299107A1.doc
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-299108A1.html
  • shall be subscribed by the declarant as true under penalty of perjury, and dated, in substantially the following form . . . : `I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on (date). (Signature)'." 47 C.F.R. S: 1.16. 18 U.S.C. S: 1001 et seq. See also 47 C.F.R. S: 1.17. P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. S: 552a(e)(3). Federal Communications Commission 2 Federal Communications Commission References 1. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-299108A1.pdf 2. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-299108A1.doc
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-299110A1.html
  • shall be subscribed by the declarant as true under penalty of perjury, and dated, in substantially the following form . . . : `I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on (date). (Signature)'." 47 C.F.R. S: 1.16. 18 U.S.C. S: 1001 et seq. See also 47 C.F.R. S: 1.17. P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. S: 552a(e)(3). Federal Communications Commission 3 Federal Communications Commission References 1. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-299110A1.pdf 2. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-299110A1.doc
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-299114A1.html
  • shall be subscribed by the declarant as true under penalty of perjury, and dated, in substantially the following form . . . : `I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on (date). (Signature)'." 47 C.F.R. S: 1.16. 18 U.S.C. S: 1001 et seq. See also 47 C.F.R. S: 1.17. P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. S: 552a(e)(3). Federal Communications Commission 3 Federal Communications Commission References 1. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-299114A1.pdf 2. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-299114A1.doc
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-299115A1.html
  • shall be subscribed by the declarant as true under penalty of perjury, and dated, in substantially the following form . . . : `I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on (date). (Signature)'." 47 C.F.R. S: 1.16. 18 U.S.C. S: 1001 et seq. See also 47 C.F.R. S: 1.17. P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. S: 552a(e)(3). Federal Communications Commission 3 Federal Communications Commission References 1. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-299115A1.pdf 2. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-299115A1.doc
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-299874A1.html
  • shall be subscribed by the declarant as true under penalty of perjury, and dated, in substantially the following form . . . : `I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on (date). (Signature)'." 47 C.F.R. S: 1.16. 18 U.S.C. S: 1001 et seq. See also 47 C.F.R. S: 1.17. P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. S: 552a(e)(3). Federal Communications Commission 2 Federal Communications Commission References 1. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-299874A1.pdf 2. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-299874A1.doc
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-300854A1.html
  • shall be subscribed by the declarant as true under penalty of perjury, and dated, in substantially the following form . . . : `I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on (date). (Signature)'." 47 C.F.R. S: 1.16. 18 U.S.C. S: 1001 et seq. See also 47 C.F.R. S: 1.17. Federal Communications Commission 3 Federal Communications Commission References 1. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-300854A1.pdf 2. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-300854A1.doc
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-300922A1.html
  • be subscribed by the declarant as true under penalty of perjury and dated, in substantially the following form . . . :" I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on (date). (Signature)'." 47 C.F. R. S: 1.16. 18 U.S.C. S: 1001 et seq. See also 47 C.F.R. S: 1.17. P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. S: 552a(e)(3). Federal Communications Commission 3 Federal Communications Commission References 1. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-300922A1.pdf 2. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-300922A1.doc
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-301056A1.html
  • disclosed in your reply, to determine what, if any, enforcement action is required to ensure compliance. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Douglas G. Miller District Director Atlanta District Office South Central Region Enforcement Bureau cc: WFLI-TV 47 C.F.R. S: 1.89. 3 47 U.S.C. S: 403 4 47 C.F.R. S: 1.89(c) 5 18 U.S.C. S: 1001 et seq. See also 47 C.F.R. S: 1.17. 6 P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. S: 552a(e)(3) Federal Communications Commission 2 Federal Communications Commission References 1. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-301056A1.pdf 2. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-301056A1.doc
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-301057A1.html
  • shall be subscribed by the declarant as true under penalty of perjury, and dated, in substantially the following form . . . : `I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on (date). (Signature)'." 47 C.F.R. S: 1.16. 18 U.S.C. S: 1001 et seq. See also 47 C.F.R. S: 1.17. P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. S: 552a(e)(3). Federal Communications Commission 3 Federal Communications Commission References 1. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-301057A1.pdf 2. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-301057A1.doc
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-301059A1.html
  • shall be subscribed by the declarant as true under penalty of perjury, and dated, in substantially the following form . . . : `I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on (date). (Signature)'." 47 C.F.R. S: 1.16. 18 U.S.C. S: 1001 et seq. See also 47 C.F.R. S: 1.17. P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. S: 552a(e)(3). Federal Communications Commission 3 Federal Communications Commission References 1. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-301059A1.pdf 2. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-301059A1.doc
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-301925A1.html
  • shall be subscribed by the declarant as true under penalty of perjury, and dated, in substantially the following form . . . : `I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on (date). (Signature)'." 47 C.F.R. S: 1.16. 18 U.S.C. S: 1001 et seq. See also 47 C.F.R. S: 1.17. P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. S: 552a(e)(3). Federal Communications Commission 2 Federal Communications Commission References 1. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-301925A1.pdf 2. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-301925A1.doc
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-301926A1.html
  • shall be subscribed by the declarant as true under penalty of perjury, and dated, in substantially the following form . . . : `I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on (date). (Signature)'." 47 C.F.R. S: 1.16. 18 U.S.C. S: 1001 et seq. See also 47 C.F.R. S: 1.17. P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. S: 552a(e)(3). Federal Communications Commission 3 Federal Communications Commission References 1. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-301926A1.pdf 2. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-301926A1.doc
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-301927A1.html
  • shall be subscribed by the declarant as true under penalty of perjury, and dated, in substantially the following form . . . : `I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on (date). (Signature)'." 47 C.F.R. S: 1.16. 18 U.S.C. S: 1001 et seq. See also 47 C.F.R. S: 1.17. P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. S: 552a(e)(3). Federal Communications Commission 2 Federal Communications Commission References 1. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-301927A1.pdf 2. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-301927A1.doc
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-302029A1.html
  • shall be subscribed by the declarant as true under penalty of perjury, and dated, in substantially the following form . . . : `I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on (date). (Signature)'." 47 C.F.R. S: 1.16. 18 U.S.C. S: 1001 et seq. See also 47 C.F.R. S: 1.17. P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. S: 552a(e)(3). Federal Communications Commission 3 Federal Communications Commission References 1. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-302029A1.pdf 2. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-302029A1.doc
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-302030A1.html
  • shall be subscribed by the declarant as true under penalty of perjury, and dated, in substantially the following form . . . : `I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on (date). (Signature)'." 47 C.F.R. S: 1.16. 18 U.S.C. S: 1001 et seq. See also 47 C.F.R. S: 1.17. P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. S: 552a(e)(3). Federal Communications Commission 3 Federal Communications Commission References 1. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-302030A1.pdf 2. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-302030A1.doc
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-302451A1.html
  • reply, to determine what, if any, enforcement action is required to ensure compliance. Any false statement made knowingly and willfully in reply to this Notice is punishable by fine or imprisonment under Title 18 of the U.S. Code. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION James M. Roop District Director Chicago District Office Northeast Region Enforcement Bureau 47 C.F.R. S: 1.89. 47 C.F.R. S: 1.17. 47 U.S.C. S: 308(b). P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. S: 552a(e)(3). 18 U.S.C. S: 1001 et seq. Federal Communications Commission 2 Federal Communications Commission References 1. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-302451A1.pdf 2. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-302451A1.doc
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-302530A1.html
  • shall be subscribed by the declarant as true under penalty of perjury, and dated, in substantially the following form . . . : `I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on (date). (Signature)'." 47 C.F.R. S: 1.16. 18 U.S.C. S: 1001 et seq. See also 47 C.F.R. S: 1.17. P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. S: 552a(e)(3). Federal Communications Commission 3 Federal Communications Commission References 1. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-302530A1.pdf 2. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-302530A1.doc
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-302531A1.html
  • shall be subscribed by the declarant as true under penalty of perjury, and dated, in substantially the following form . . . : `I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on (date). (Signature)'." 47 C.F.R. S: 1.16. 18 U.S.C. S: 1001 et seq. See also 47 C.F.R. S: 1.17. P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. S: 552a(e)(3). Federal Communications Commission 3 Federal Communications Commission References 1. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-302531A1.pdf 2. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-302531A1.doc
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-302946A1.html
  • shall be subscribed by the declarant as true under penalty of perjury, and dated, in substantially the following form . . . : `I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on (date). (Signature)'." 47 C.F.R. S: 1.16. 18 U.S.C. S: 1001 et seq. See also 47 C.F.R. S: 1.17. P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. S: 552a(e)(3). Federal Communications Commission 3 Federal Communications Commission References 1. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-302946A1.pdf 2. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-302946A1.doc
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-303042A1.html
  • shall be subscribed by the declarant as true under penalty of perjury, and dated, in substantially the following form . . . : `I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on (date). (Signature)'." 47 C.F.R. S: 1.16. 18 U.S.C. S: 1001 et seq. See also 47 C.F.R. S: 1.17. P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. S: 552a(e)(3). 18 U.S.C. S: 1001 et seq. Federal Communications Commission 3 Federal Communications Commission References 1. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303042A1.pdf 2. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303042A1.doc
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-303222A1.html
  • shall be subscribed by the declarant as true under penalty of perjury, and dated, in substantially the following form . . . : `I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on (date). (Signature)'." 47 C.F.R. S: 1.16. 18 U.S.C. S: 1001 et seq. See also 47 C.F.R. S: 1.17. P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. S: 552a(e)(3). Federal Communications Commission 3 Federal Communications Commission References 1. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303222A1.pdf 2. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303222A1.doc
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-303695A1.html
  • shall be subscribed by the declarant as true under penalty of perjury, and dated, in substantially the following form . . . : `I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on (date). (Signature)'." 47 C.F.R. S: 1.16. 18 U.S.C. S: 1001 et seq. See also 47 C.F.R. S: 1.17. P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. S: 552a(e)(3). Federal Communications Commission 2 Federal Communications Commission References 1. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303695A1.pdf 2. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303695A1.doc
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-303811A1.html
  • shall be subscribed by the declarant as true under penalty of perjury, and dated, in substantially the following form . . . : `I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on (date). (Signature)'." 47 C.F.R. S: 1.16. 18 U.S.C. S: 1001 et seq. See also 47 C.F.R. S: 1.17. P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. S: 552a(e)(3). Federal Communications Commission 2 Federal Communications Commission References 1. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303811A1.pdf 2. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303811A1.doc
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-303812A1.html
  • shall be subscribed by the declarant as true under penalty of perjury, and dated, in substantially the following form . . . : `I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on (date). (Signature)'." 47 C.F.R. S: 1.16. 18 U.S.C. S: 1001 et seq. See also 47 C.F.R. S: 1.17. P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. S: 552a(e)(3). Federal Communications Commission 2 Federal Communications Commission References 1. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303812A1.pdf 2. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303812A1.doc
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-303813A1.html
  • shall be subscribed by the declarant as true under penalty of perjury, and dated, in substantially the following form . . . : `I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on (date). (Signature)'." 47 C.F.R. S: 1.16. 18 U.S.C. S: 1001 et seq. See also 47 C.F.R. S: 1.17. P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. S: 552a(e)(3). 18 U.S.C. S: 1001 et seq. Federal Communications Commission 3 Federal Communications Commission References 1. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303813A1.pdf 2. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303813A1.doc
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-303989A1.html
  • shall be subscribed by the declarant as true under penalty of perjury, and dated, in substantially the following form . . . : `I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on (date). (Signature)'." 47 C.F.R. S: 1.16. 18 U.S.C. S: 1001 et seq. See also 47 C.F.R. S: 1.17. P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. S: 552a(e)(3). Federal Communications Commission 3 Federal Communications Commission References 1. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303989A1.pdf 2. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303989A1.doc
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-304202A1.html
  • shall be subscribed by the declarant as true under penalty of perjury, and dated, in substantially the following form . . . : `I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on (date). (Signature)'." 47 C.F.R. S: 1.16. 18 U.S.C. S: 1001 et seq. See also 47 C.F.R. S: 1.17. P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. S: 552a(e)(3). 18 U.S.C. S: 1001 et seq. Federal Communications Commission 3 Federal Communications Commission References 1. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-304202A1.pdf 2. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-304202A1.doc
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-304628A1.html
  • shall be subscribed by the declarant as true under penalty of perjury, and dated, in substantially the following form . . . : `I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on (date). (Signature)'." 47 C.F.R. S: 1.16. 18 U.S.C. S: 1001 et seq. See also 47 C.F.R. S: 1.17. P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. S: 552a(e)(3). Federal Communications Commission 2 Federal Communications Commission References 1. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-304628A1.pdf 2. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-304628A1.doc
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-305116A1.html
  • shall be subscribed by the declarant as true under penalty of perjury, and dated, in substantially the following form . . . : `I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on (date). (Signature)'." 47 C.F.R. S: 1.16. 18 U.S.C. S: 1001 et seq. See also 47 C.F.R. S: 1.17. P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. S: 552a(e)(3). Federal Communications Commission 3 Federal Communications Commission References 1. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-305116A1.pdf 2. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-305116A1.doc
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-305159A1.html
  • shall be subscribed by the declarant as true under penalty of perjury, and dated, in substantially the following form . . . : `I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on (date). (Signature)'." 47 C.F.R. S: 1.16. 18 U.S.C. S: 1001 et seq. See also 47 C.F.R. S: 1.17. P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. S: 552a(e)(3). Federal Communications Commission 3 Federal Communications Commission References 1. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-305159A1.pdf 2. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-305159A1.doc
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-305160A1.html
  • shall be subscribed by the declarant as true under penalty of perjury, and dated, in substantially the following form . . . : `I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on (date). (Signature)'." 47 C.F.R. S: 1.16. 18 U.S.C. S: 1001 et seq. See also 47 C.F.R. S: 1.17. P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. S: 552a(e)(3). Federal Communications Commission 2 Federal Communications Commission References 1. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-305160A1.pdf 2. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-305160A1.doc
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-305410A1.html
  • shall be subscribed by the declarant as true under penalty of perjury, and dated, in substantially the following form . . . : `I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on (date). (Signature)'." 47 C.F.R. S: 1.16. 18 U.S.C. S: 1001 et seq. See also 47 C.F.R. S: 1.17. P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. S: 552a(e)(3). 18 U.S.C. S: 1001 et seq. Federal Communications Commission 3 Federal Communications Commission References 1. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-305410A1.pdf 2. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-305410A1.doc
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-306449A1.html
  • shall be subscribed by the declarant as true under penalty of perjury, and dated, in substantially the following form . . . : `I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on (date). (Signature)'." 47 C.F.R. S: 1.16. 18 U.S.C. S: 1001 et seq. See also 47 C.F.R. S: 1.17. P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. S: 552a(e)(3). 18 U.S.C. S: 1001 et seq. Federal Communications Commission 4 Federal Communications Commission References 1. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-306449A1.pdf 2. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-306449A1.doc
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-306474A1.html
  • shall be subscribed by the declarant as true under penalty of perjury, and dated, in substantially the following form . . . : `I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on (date). (Signature)'." 47 C.F.R. S: 1.16. 18 U.S.C. S: 1001 et seq. See also 47 C.F.R. S: 1.17. P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. S: 552a(e)(3). Federal Communications Commission 2 Federal Communications Commission References 1. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-306474A1.pdf 2. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-306474A1.doc
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-306901A1.html
  • shall be subscribed by the declarant as true under penalty of perjury, and dated, in substantially the following form . . . : `I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on (date). (Signature)'." 47 C.F.R. S: 1.16. 18 U.S.C. S: 1001 et seq. See also 47 C.F.R. S: 1.17. P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. S: 552a(e)(3). Federal Communications Commission 3 Federal Communications Commission References 1. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-306901A1.pdf 2. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-306901A1.doc
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-307477A1.html
  • shall be subscribed by the declarant as true under penalty of perjury, and dated, in substantially the following form . . . : `I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on (date). (Signature)'." 47 C.F.R. S: 1.16. 18 U.S.C. S: 1001 et seq. See also 47 C.F.R. S: 1.17. P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. S: 552a(e)(3). Federal Communications Commission 3 Federal Communications Commission References 1. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-307477A1.pdf 2. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-307477A1.doc
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-307999A1.html
  • shall be subscribed by the declarant as true under penalty of perjury, and dated, in substantially the following form . . . : `I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on (date). (Signature)'." 47 C.F.R. S: 1.16. 18 U.S.C. S: 1001 et seq. See also 47 C.F.R. S: 1.17. P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. S: 552a(e)(3). Federal Communications Commission 3 Federal Communications Commission References 1. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-307999A1.pdf 2. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-307999A1.doc
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-308322A1.html
  • shall be subscribed by the declarant as true under penalty of perjury, and dated, in substantially the following form . . . : `I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on (date). (Signature)'." 47 C.F.R. S: 1.16. 18 U.S.C. S: 1001 et seq. See also 47 C.F.R. S: 1.17. P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. S: 552a(e)(3). Federal Communications Commission 2 Federal Communications Commission References 1. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-308322A1.pdf 2. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-308322A1.doc
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-308323A1.html
  • shall be subscribed by the declarant as true under penalty of perjury, and dated, in substantially the following form . . . : `I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on (date). (Signature)'." 47 C.F.R. S: 1.16. 18 U.S.C. S: 1001 et seq. See also 47 C.F.R. S: 1.17. P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. S: 552a(e)(3). Federal Communications Commission 3 Federal Communications Commission References 1. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-308323A1.pdf 2. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-308323A1.doc
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-308324A1.html
  • shall be subscribed by the declarant as true under penalty of perjury, and dated, in substantially the following form . . . : `I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on (date). (Signature)'." 47 C.F.R. S: 1.16. 18 U.S.C. S: 1001 et seq. See also 47 C.F.R. S: 1.17. P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. S: 552a(e)(3). Federal Communications Commission 3 Federal Communications Commission References 1. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-308324A1.pdf 2. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-308324A1.doc
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-308325A1.html
  • shall be subscribed by the declarant as true under penalty of perjury, and dated, in substantially the following form . . . : `I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on (date). (Signature)'." 47 C.F.R. S: 1.16. 18 U.S.C. S: 1001 et seq. See also 47 C.F.R. S: 1.17. P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. S: 552a(e)(3). Federal Communications Commission 3 Federal Communications Commission References 1. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-308325A1.pdf 2. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-308325A1.doc
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-308326A1.html
  • shall be subscribed by the declarant as true under penalty of perjury, and dated, in substantially the following form . . . : `I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on (date). (Signature)'." 47 C.F.R. S: 1.16. 18 U.S.C. S: 1001 et seq. See also 47 C.F.R. S: 1.17. P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. S: 552a(e)(3). Federal Communications Commission 3 Federal Communications Commission References 1. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-308326A1.pdf 2. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-308326A1.doc
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-308421A1.html
  • shall be subscribed by the declarant as true under penalty of perjury, and dated, in substantially the following form . . . : `I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on (date). (Signature)'." 47 C.F.R. S: 1.16. 18 U.S.C. S: 1001 et seq. See also 47 C.F.R. S: 1.17. P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. S: 552a(e)(3). Federal Communications Commission 3 Federal Communications Commission References 1. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-308421A1.pdf 2. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-308421A1.doc
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-308425A1.html
  • shall be subscribed by the declarant as true under penalty of perjury, and dated, in substantially the following form . . . : `I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on (date). (Signature)'." 47 C.F.R. S: 1.16. 18 U.S.C. S: 1001 et seq. See also 47 C.F.R. S: 1.17. P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. S: 552a(e)(3). Federal Communications Commission 2 Federal Communications Commission References 1. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-308425A1.pdf 2. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-308425A1.doc
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-308426A1.html
  • shall be subscribed by the declarant as true under penalty of perjury, and dated, in substantially the following form . . . : `I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on (date). (Signature)'." 47 C.F.R. S: 1.16. 18 U.S.C. S: 1001 et seq. See also 47 C.F.R. S: 1.17. P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. S: 552a(e)(3). Federal Communications Commission 2 Federal Communications Commission References 1. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-308426A1.pdf 2. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-308426A1.doc
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-308427A1.html
  • shall be subscribed by the declarant as true under penalty of perjury, and dated, in substantially the following form . . . : `I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on (date). (Signature)'." 47 C.F.R. S: 1.16. 18 U.S.C. S: 1001 et seq. See also 47 C.F.R. S: 1.17. P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. S: 552a(e)(3). Federal Communications Commission 2 Federal Communications Commission References 1. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-308427A1.pdf 2. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-308427A1.doc
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-308940A1.html
  • shall be subscribed by the declarant as true under penalty of perjury, and dated, in substantially the following form . . . : `I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on (date). (Signature)'." 47 C.F.R. S: 1.16. 18 U.S.C. S: 1001 et seq. See also 47 C.F.R. S: 1.17. P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. S: 552a(e)(3). 18 U.S.C. S: 1001 et seq. Federal Communications Commission 3 Federal Communications Commission References 1. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-308940A1.pdf 2. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-308940A1.doc
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-308942A1.html
  • shall be subscribed by the declarant as true under penalty of perjury, and dated, in substantially the following form . . . : `I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on (date). (Signature)'." 47 C.F.R. S: 1.16. 18 U.S.C. S: 1001 et seq. See also 47 C.F.R. S: 1.17. P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. S: 552a(e)(3). Federal Communications Commission 3 Federal Communications Commission References 1. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-308942A1.pdf 2. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-308942A1.doc
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-309208A1.html
  • shall be subscribed by the declarant as true under penalty of perjury, and dated, in substantially the following form . . . : `I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on (date). (Signature)'." 47 C.F.R. S: 1.16. 18 U.S.C. S: 1001 et seq. See also 47 C.F.R. S: 1.17. P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. S: 552a(e)(3). Federal Communications Commission 1 2 Federal Communications Commission References 1. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-309208A1.pdf 2. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-309208A1.doc
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-309310A1.html
  • shall be subscribed by the declarant as true under penalty of perjury, and dated, in substantially the following form . . . : `I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on (date). (Signature)'." 47 C.F.R. S: 1.16. 18 U.S.C. S: 1001 et seq. See also 47 C.F.R. S: 1.17. P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. S: 552a(e)(3). Federal Communications Commission 3 Federal Communications Commission References 1. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-309310A1.pdf 2. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-309310A1.doc
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-309449A1.html
  • shall be subscribed by the declarant as true under penalty of perjury, and dated, in substantially the following form . . . : `I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on (date). (Signature)'." 47 C.F.R. S: 1.16. 18 U.S.C. S: 1001 et seq. See also 47 C.F.R. S: 1.17. P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. S: 552a(e)(3). Federal Communications Commission 3 Federal Communications Commission References 1. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-309449A1.pdf 2. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-309449A1.doc
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-309786A1.html
  • shall be subscribed by the declarant as true under penalty of perjury, and dated, in substantially the following form . . . : `I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on (date). (Signature)'." 47 C.F.R. S: 1.16. 18 U.S.C. S: 1001 et seq. See also 47 C.F.R. S: 1.17. P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. S: 552a(e)(3). Federal Communications Commission 2 Federal Communications Commission References 1. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-309786A1.pdf 2. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-309786A1.doc
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-309787A1.html
  • shall be subscribed by the declarant as true under penalty of perjury, and dated, in substantially the following form . . . : `I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on (date). (Signature)'." 47 C.F.R. S: 1.16. 18 U.S.C. S: 1001 et seq. See also 47 C.F.R. S: 1.17. P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. S: 552a(e)(3). Federal Communications Commission 2 Federal Communications Commission References 1. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-309787A1.pdf 2. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-309787A1.doc
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-309788A1.html
  • shall be subscribed by the declarant as true under penalty of perjury, and dated, in substantially the following form . . . : `I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on (date). (Signature)'." 47 C.F.R. S: 1.16. 18 U.S.C. S: 1001 et seq. See also 47 C.F.R. S: 1.17. P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. S: 552a(e)(3). Federal Communications Commission 2 Federal Communications Commission References 1. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-309788A1.pdf 2. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-309788A1.doc
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-309789A1.html
  • shall be subscribed by the declarant as true under penalty of perjury, and dated, in substantially the following form . . . : `I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on (date). (Signature)'." 47 C.F.R. S: 1.16. 18 U.S.C. S: 1001 et seq. See also 47 C.F.R. S: 1.17. P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. S: 552a(e)(3). Federal Communications Commission 2 Federal Communications Commission References 1. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-309789A1.pdf 2. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-309789A1.doc
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-309790A1.html
  • shall be subscribed by the declarant as true under penalty of perjury, and dated, in substantially the following form . . . : `I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on (date). (Signature)'." 47 C.F.R. S: 1.16. 18 U.S.C. S: 1001 et seq. See also 47 C.F.R. S: 1.17. P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. S: 552a(e)(3). Federal Communications Commission 3 Federal Communications Commission References 1. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-309790A1.pdf 2. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-309790A1.doc
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-309791A1.html
  • shall be subscribed by the declarant as true under penalty of perjury, and dated, in substantially the following form . . . : `I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on (date). (Signature)'." 47 C.F.R. S: 1.16. 18 U.S.C. S: 1001 et seq. See also 47 C.F.R. S: 1.17. P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. S: 552a(e)(3). Federal Communications Commission 3 Federal Communications Commission References 1. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-309791A1.pdf 2. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-309791A1.doc
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-309794A1.html
  • shall be subscribed by the declarant as true under penalty of perjury, and dated, in substantially the following form . . . : `I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on (date). (Signature)'." 47 C.F.R. S: 1.16. 18 U.S.C. S: 1001 et seq. See also 47 C.F.R. S: 1.17. P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. S: 552a(e)(3). Federal Communications Commission 3 Federal Communications Commission References 1. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-309794A1.pdf 2. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-309794A1.doc
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-309795A1.html
  • shall be subscribed by the declarant as true under penalty of perjury, and dated, in substantially the following form . . . : `I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on (date). (Signature)'." 47 C.F.R. S: 1.16. 18 U.S.C. S: 1001 et seq. See also 47 C.F.R. S: 1.17. P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. S: 552a(e)(3). Federal Communications Commission 3 Federal Communications Commission References 1. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-309795A1.pdf 2. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-309795A1.doc
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-309796A1.html
  • shall be subscribed by the declarant as true under penalty of perjury, and dated, in substantially the following form . . . : `I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on (date). (Signature)'." 47 C.F.R. S: 1.16. 18 U.S.C. S: 1001 et seq. See also 47 C.F.R. S: 1.17. P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. S: 552a(e)(3). Federal Communications Commission 3 Federal Communications Commission References 1. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-309796A1.pdf 2. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-309796A1.doc
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-309797A1.html
  • shall be subscribed by the declarant as true under penalty of perjury, and dated, in substantially the following form . . . : `I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on (date). (Signature)'." 47 C.F.R. S: 1.16. 18 U.S.C. S: 1001 et seq. See also 47 C.F.R. S: 1.17. P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. S: 552a(e)(3). Federal Communications Commission 3 Federal Communications Commission References 1. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-309797A1.pdf 2. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-309797A1.doc
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-309798A1.html
  • shall be subscribed by the declarant as true under penalty of perjury, and dated, in substantially the following form . . . : `I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on (date). (Signature)'." 47 C.F.R. S: 1.16. 18 U.S.C. S: 1001 et seq. See also 47 C.F.R. S: 1.17. P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. S: 552a(e)(3). Federal Communications Commission 3 Federal Communications Commission References 1. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-309798A1.pdf 2. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-309798A1.doc
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-309799A1.html
  • shall be subscribed by the declarant as true under penalty of perjury, and dated, in substantially the following form . . . : `I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on (date). (Signature)'." 47 C.F.R. S: 1.16. 18 U.S.C. S: 1001 et seq. See also 47 C.F.R. S: 1.17. P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. S: 552a(e)(3). Federal Communications Commission 3 Federal Communications Commission References 1. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-309799A1.pdf 2. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-309799A1.doc
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-309803A1.html
  • shall be subscribed by the declarant as true under penalty of perjury, and dated, in substantially the following form . . . : `I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on (date). (Signature)'." 47 C.F.R. S: 1.16. 18 U.S.C. S: 1001 et seq. See also 47 C.F.R. S: 1.17. P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. S: 552a(e)(3). Federal Communications Commission 3 Federal Communications Commission References 1. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-309803A1.pdf 2. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-309803A1.doc
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-309811A1.html
  • shall be subscribed by the declarant as true under penalty of perjury, and dated, in substantially the following form . . . : `I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on (date). (Signature)'." 47 C.F.R. S: 1.16. 18 U.S.C. S: 1001 et seq. See also 47 C.F.R. S: 1.17. P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. S: 552a(e)(3). Federal Communications Commission 3 Federal Communications Commission References 1. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-309811A1.pdf 2. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-309811A1.doc
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-310098A1.html
  • shall be subscribed by the declarant as true under penalty of perjury, and dated, in substantially the following form . . . : `I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on (date). (Signature)'." 47 C.F.R. S: 1.16. 18 U.S.C. S: 1001 et seq. See also 47 C.F.R. S: 1.17. P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. S: 552a(e)(3). Federal Communications Commission 3 Federal Communications Commission References 1. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-310098A1.pdf 2. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-310098A1.doc
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-310099A1.html
  • shall be subscribed by the declarant as true under penalty of perjury, and dated, in substantially the following form . . . : `I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on (date). (Signature)'." 47 C.F.R. S: 1.16. 18 U.S.C. S: 1001 et seq. See also 47 C.F.R. S: 1.17. P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. S: 552a(e)(3). Federal Communications Commission 3 Federal Communications Commission References 1. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-310099A1.pdf 2. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-310099A1.doc
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-310100A1.html
  • shall be subscribed by the declarant as true under penalty of perjury, and dated, in substantially the following form . . . : `I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on (date). (Signature)'." 47 C.F.R. S: 1.16. 18 U.S.C. S: 1001 et seq. See also 47 C.F.R. S: 1.17. P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. S: 552a(e)(3). Federal Communications Commission 2 Federal Communications Commission References 1. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-310100A1.pdf 2. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-310100A1.doc
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-310101A1.html
  • shall be subscribed by the declarant as true under penalty of perjury, and dated, in substantially the following form . . . : `I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on (date). (Signature)'." 47 C.F.R. S: 1.16. 18 U.S.C. S: 1001 et seq. See also 47 C.F.R. S: 1.17. P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. S: 552a(e)(3). Federal Communications Commission 3 Federal Communications Commission References 1. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-310101A1.pdf 2. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-310101A1.doc
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-310311A1.html
  • shall be subscribed by the declarant as true under penalty of perjury, and dated, in substantially the following form . . . : `I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on (date). (Signature)'." 47 C.F.R. S: 1.16. 18 U.S.C. S: 1001 et seq. See also 47 C.F.R. S: 1.17. P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. S: 552a(e)(3). Federal Communications Commission 3 Federal Communications Commission References 1. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-310311A1.pdf 2. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-310311A1.doc
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-310312A1.html
  • shall be subscribed by the declarant as true under penalty of perjury, and dated, in substantially the following form . . . : `I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on (date). (Signature)'." 47 C.F.R. S: 1.16. 18 U.S.C. S: 1001 et seq. See also 47 C.F.R. S: 1.17. P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. S: 552a(e)(3). Federal Communications Commission 2 Federal Communications Commission References 1. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-310312A1.pdf 2. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-310312A1.doc
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-310313A1.html
  • shall be subscribed by the declarant as true under penalty of perjury, and dated, in substantially the following form . . . : `I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on (date). (Signature)'." 47 C.F.R. S: 1.16. 18 U.S.C. S: 1001 et seq. See also 47 C.F.R. S: 1.17. P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. S: 552a(e)(3). Federal Communications Commission 3 Federal Communications Commission References 1. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-310313A1.pdf 2. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-310313A1.doc
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-310620A1.html
  • shall be subscribed by the declarant as true under penalty of perjury, and dated, in substantially the following form . . . : `I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on (date). (Signature)'." 47 C.F.R. S: 1.16. 18 U.S.C. S: 1001 et seq. See also 47 C.F.R. S: 1.17. P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. S: 552a(e)(3). Federal Communications Commission 3 Federal Communications Commission References 1. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-310620A1.pdf 2. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-310620A1.doc
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-310731A1.html
  • shall be subscribed by the declarant as true under penalty of perjury, and dated, in substantially the following form . . . : `I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on (date). (Signature)'." 47 C.F.R. S: 1.16. 18 U.S.C. S: 1001 et seq. See also 47 C.F.R. S: 1.17. P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. S: 552a(e)(3). Federal Communications Commission 3 Federal Communications Commission References 1. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-310731A1.pdf 2. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-310731A1.doc
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-310868A1.html
  • shall be subscribed by the declarant as true under penalty of perjury, and dated, in substantially the following form . . . : `I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on (date). (Signature)'." 47 C.F.R. S: 1.16. 18 U.S.C. S: 1001 et seq. See also 47 C.F.R. S: 1.17. P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. S: 552a(e)(3). Federal Communications Commission 2 Federal Communications Commission References 1. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-310868A1.pdf 2. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-310868A1.doc
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-310869A1.html
  • shall be subscribed by the declarant as true under penalty of perjury, and dated, in substantially the following form . . . : `I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on (date). (Signature)'." 47 C.F.R. S: 1.16. 18 U.S.C. S: 1001 et seq. See also 47 C.F.R. S: 1.17. P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. S: 552a(e)(3). Federal Communications Commission 4 Federal Communications Commission References 1. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-310869A1.pdf 2. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-310869A1.doc
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-310870A1.html
  • shall be subscribed by the declarant as true under penalty of perjury, and dated, in substantially the following form . . . : `I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on (date). (Signature)'." 47 C.F.R. S: 1.16. 18 U.S.C. S: 1001 et seq. See also 47 C.F.R. S: 1.17. P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. S: 552a(e)(3). Federal Communications Commission 3 Federal Communications Commission References 1. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-310870A1.pdf 2. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-310870A1.doc
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-310970A1.html
  • shall be subscribed by the declarant as true under penalty of perjury, and dated, in substantially the following form . . . : `I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on (date). (Signature)'." 47 C.F.R. S: 1.16. 18 U.S.C. S: 1001 et seq. See also 47 C.F.R. S: 1.17. P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. S: 552a(e)(3). Federal Communications Commission 3 Federal Communications Commission References 1. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-310970A1.pdf 2. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-310970A1.doc
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-311568A1.html
  • shall be subscribed by the declarant as true under penalty of perjury, and dated, in substantially the following form . . . : `I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on (date). (Signature)'." 47 C.F.R. S: 1.16. 18 U.S.C. S: 1001 et seq. See also 47 C.F.R. S: 1.17. P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. S: 552a(e)(3). Federal Communications Commission 1 2 Federal Communications Commission References 1. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-311568A1.pdf 2. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-311568A1.doc
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-311569A1.html
  • shall be subscribed by the declarant as true under penalty of perjury, and dated, in substantially the following form . . . : `I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on (date). (Signature)'." 47 C.F.R. S: 1.16. 18 U.S.C. S: 1001 et seq. See also 47 C.F.R. S: 1.17. P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. S: 552a(e)(3). Federal Communications Commission 1 3 Federal Communications Commission References 1. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-311569A1.pdf 2. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-311569A1.doc
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-311695A1.html
  • shall be subscribed by the declarant as true under penalty of perjury, and dated, in substantially the following form . . . : `I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on (date). (Signature)'." 47 C.F.R. S: 1.16. 18 U.S.C. S: 1001 et seq. See also 47 C.F.R. S: 1.17. P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. S: 552a(e)(3). Federal Communications Commission 4 Federal Communications Commission References 1. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-311695A1.pdf 2. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-311695A1.doc
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-311710A1.html
  • shall be subscribed by the declarant as true under penalty of perjury, and dated, in substantially the following form . . . : `I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on (date). (Signature)'." 47 C.F.R. S: 1.16. 18 U.S.C. S: 1001 et seq. See also 47 C.F.R. S: 1.17. P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. S: 552a(e)(3). Federal Communications Commission 3 Federal Communications Commission References 1. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-311710A1.pdf 2. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-311710A1.doc
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-311713A1.html
  • shall be subscribed by the declarant as true under penalty of perjury, and dated, in substantially the following form . . . : `I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on (date). (Signature)'." 47 C.F.R. S: 1.16. 18 U.S.C. S: 1001 et seq. See also 47 C.F.R. S: 1.17. P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. S: 552a(e)(3). Federal Communications Commission 2 Federal Communications Commission References 1. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-311713A1.pdf 2. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-311713A1.doc
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-311714A1.html
  • shall be subscribed by the declarant as true under penalty of perjury, and dated, in substantially the following form . . . : `I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on (date). (Signature)'." 47 C.F.R. S: 1.16. 18 U.S.C. S: 1001 et seq. See also 47 C.F.R. S: 1.17. P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. S: 552a(e)(3). Federal Communications Commission 3 Federal Communications Commission References 1. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-311714A1.pdf 2. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-311714A1.doc
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-311715A1.html
  • shall be subscribed by the declarant as true under penalty of perjury, and dated, in substantially the following form . . . : `I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on (date). (Signature)'." 47 C.F.R. S: 1.16. 18 U.S.C. S: 1001 et seq. See also 47 C.F.R. S: 1.17. P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. S: 552a(e)(3). Federal Communications Commission 3 Federal Communications Commission References 1. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-311715A1.pdf 2. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-311715A1.doc
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-312038A1.html
  • shall be subscribed by the declarant as true under penalty of perjury, and dated, in substantially the following form . . . : `I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on (date). (Signature)'." 47 C.F.R. S: 1.16. 18 U.S.C. S: 1001 et seq. See also 47 C.F.R. S: 1.17. P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. S: 552a(e)(3). Federal Communications Commission 3 3 Federal Communications Commission References 1. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-312038A1.pdf 2. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-312038A1.doc
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-312039A1.html
  • shall be subscribed by the declarant as true under penalty of perjury, and dated, in substantially the following form . . . : `I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on (date). (Signature)'." 47 C.F.R. S: 1.16. 18 U.S.C. S: 1001 et seq. See also 47 C.F.R. S: 1.17. P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. S: 552a(e)(3). Federal Communications Commission 3 3 Federal Communications Commission References 1. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-312039A1.pdf 2. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-312039A1.doc
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-312040A1.html
  • shall be subscribed by the declarant as true under penalty of perjury, and dated, in substantially the following form . . . : `I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on (date). (Signature)'." 47 C.F.R. S: 1.16. 18 U.S.C. S: 1001 et seq. See also 47 C.F.R. S: 1.17. P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. S: 552a(e)(3). Federal Communications Commission 3 Federal Communications Commission References 1. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-312040A1.pdf 2. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-312040A1.doc
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-312041A1.html
  • shall be subscribed by the declarant as true under penalty of perjury, and dated, in substantially the following form . . . : `I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on (date). (Signature)'." 47 C.F.R. S: 1.16. 18 U.S.C. S: 1001 et seq. See also 47 C.F.R. S: 1.17. P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. S: 552a(e)(3). Federal Communications Commission 3 Federal Communications Commission References 1. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-312041A1.pdf 2. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-312041A1.doc
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-312042A1.html
  • shall be subscribed by the declarant as true under penalty of perjury, and dated, in substantially the following form . . . : `I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on (date). (Signature)'." 47 C.F.R. S: 1.16. 18 U.S.C. S: 1001 et seq. See also 47 C.F.R. S: 1.17. P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. S: 552a(e)(3). Federal Communications Commission 3 Federal Communications Commission References 1. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-312042A1.pdf 2. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-312042A1.doc
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-312043A1.html
  • shall be subscribed by the declarant as true under penalty of perjury, and dated, in substantially the following form . . . : `I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on (date). (Signature)'." 47 C.F.R. S: 1.16. 18 U.S.C. S: 1001 et seq. See also 47 C.F.R. S: 1.17. P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. S: 552a(e)(3). Federal Communications Commission 2 Federal Communications Commission References 1. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-312043A1.pdf 2. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-312043A1.doc
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-312044A1.html
  • shall be subscribed by the declarant as true under penalty of perjury, and dated, in substantially the following form . . . : `I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on (date). (Signature)'." 47 C.F.R. S: 1.16. 18 U.S.C. S: 1001 et seq. See also 47 C.F.R. S: 1.17. P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. S: 552a(e)(3). Federal Communications Commission 3 Federal Communications Commission References 1. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-312044A1.pdf 2. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-312044A1.doc
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-312045A1.html
  • shall be subscribed by the declarant as true under penalty of perjury, and dated, in substantially the following form . . . : `I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on (date). (Signature)'." 47 C.F.R. S: 1.16. 18 U.S.C. S: 1001 et seq. See also 47 C.F.R. S: 1.17. P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. S: 552a(e)(3). Federal Communications Commission 3 Federal Communications Commission References 1. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-312045A1.pdf 2. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-312045A1.doc
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-312046A1.html
  • shall be subscribed by the declarant as true under penalty of perjury, and dated, in substantially the following form . . . : `I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on (date). (Signature)'." 47 C.F.R. S: 1.16. 18 U.S.C. S: 1001 et seq. See also 47 C.F.R. S: 1.17. P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. S: 552a(e)(3). Federal Communications Commission 3 Federal Communications Commission References 1. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-312046A1.pdf 2. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-312046A1.doc
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-312556A1.html
  • shall be subscribed by the declarant as true under penalty of perjury, and dated, in substantially the following form . . . : `I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on (date). (Signature)'." 47 C.F.R. S: 1.16. 18 U.S.C. S: 1001 et seq. See also 47 C.F.R. S: 1.17. P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. S: 552a(e)(3). Federal Communications Commission 3 Federal Communications Commission References 1. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-312556A1.pdf 2. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-312556A1.doc
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-312655A1.html
  • shall be subscribed by the declarant as true under penalty of perjury, and dated, in substantially the following form . . . : `I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on (date). (Signature)'." 47 C.F.R. S: 1.16. 18 U.S.C. S: 1001 et seq. See also 47 C.F.R. S: 1.17. P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. S: 552a(e)(3). Federal Communications Commission 3 Federal Communications Commission References 1. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-312655A1.pdf 2. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-312655A1.doc
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-312656A1.html
  • shall be subscribed by the declarant as true under penalty of perjury, and dated, in substantially the following form . . . : `I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on (date). (Signature)'." 47 C.F.R. S: 1.16. 18 U.S.C. S: 1001 et seq. See also 47 C.F.R. S: 1.17. P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. S: 552a(e)(3). Federal Communications Commission 3 Federal Communications Commission References 1. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-312656A1.pdf 2. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-312656A1.doc
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-312657A1.html
  • shall be subscribed by the declarant as true under penalty of perjury, and dated, in substantially the following form . . . : `I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on (date). (Signature)'." 47 C.F.R. S: 1.16. 18 U.S.C. S: 1001 et seq. See also 47 C.F.R. S: 1.17. P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. S: 552a(e)(3). Federal Communications Commission 3 Federal Communications Commission References 1. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-312657A1.pdf 2. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-312657A1.doc
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-312908A1.html
  • shall be subscribed by the declarant as true under penalty of perjury, and dated, in substantially the following form . . . : `I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on (date). (Signature)'." 47 C.F.R. S: 1.16. 18 U.S.C. S: 1001 et seq. See also 47 C.F.R. S: 1.17. P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. S: 552a(e)(3). Federal Communications Commission 3 Federal Communications Commission References 1. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-312908A1.pdf 2. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-312908A1.doc
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-313467A1.html
  • shall be subscribed by the declarant as true under penalty of perjury, and dated, in substantially the following form . . . : `I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on (date). (Signature)'." 47 C.F.R. S: 1.16. 18 U.S.C. S: 1001 et seq. See also 47 C.F.R. S: 1.17. P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. S: 552a(e)(3). Federal Communications Commission 3 Federal Communications Commission References 1. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-313467A1.pdf 2. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-313467A1.doc
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-313468A1.html
  • shall be subscribed by the declarant as true under penalty of perjury, and dated, in substantially the following form . . . : `I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on (date). (Signature)'." 47 C.F.R. S: 1.16. 18 U.S.C. S: 1001 et seq. See also 47 C.F.R. S: 1.17. P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. S: 552a(e)(3). Federal Communications Commission 3 Federal Communications Commission References 1. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-313468A1.pdf 2. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-313468A1.doc
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-313584A1.html
  • shall be subscribed by the declarant as true under penalty of perjury, and dated, in substantially the following form . . . : `I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on (date). (Signature)'." 47 C.F.R. S: 1.16. 18 U.S.C. S: 1001 et seq. See also 47 C.F.R. S: 1.17. P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. S: 552a(e)(3). Federal Communications Commission 3 Federal Communications Commission References 1. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-313584A1.pdf 2. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-313584A1.doc
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-313585A1.html
  • shall be subscribed by the declarant as true under penalty of perjury, and dated, in substantially the following form . . . : `I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on (date). (Signature)'." 47 C.F.R. S: 1.16. 18 U.S.C. S: 1001 et seq. See also 47 C.F.R. S: 1.17. P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. S: 552a(e)(3). Federal Communications Commission 3 Federal Communications Commission References 1. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-313585A1.pdf 2. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-313585A1.doc
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-313586A1.html
  • shall be subscribed by the declarant as true under penalty of perjury, and dated, in substantially the following form . . . : `I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on (date). (Signature)'." 47 C.F.R. S: 1.16. 18 U.S.C. S: 1001 et seq. See also 47 C.F.R. S: 1.17. P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. S: 552a(e)(3). Federal Communications Commission 3 Federal Communications Commission References 1. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-313586A1.pdf 2. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-313586A1.doc
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-313587A1.html
  • shall be subscribed by the declarant as true under penalty of perjury, and dated, in substantially the following form . . . : `I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on (date). (Signature)'." 47 C.F.R. S: 1.16. 18 U.S.C. S: 1001 et seq. See also 47 C.F.R. S: 1.17. P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. S: 552a(e)(3). Federal Communications Commission 3 Federal Communications Commission References 1. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-313587A1.pdf 2. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-313587A1.doc
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-313588A1.html
  • shall be subscribed by the declarant as true under penalty of perjury, and dated, in substantially the following form . . . : `I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on (date). (Signature)'." 47 C.F.R. S: 1.16. 18 U.S.C. S: 1001 et seq. See also 47 C.F.R. S: 1.17. P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. S: 552a(e)(3). Federal Communications Commission 3 Federal Communications Commission References 1. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-313588A1.pdf 2. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-313588A1.doc
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-314039A1.html
  • shall be subscribed by the declarant as true under penalty of perjury, and dated, in substantially the following form . . . : `I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on (date). (Signature)'." 47 C.F.R. S: 1.16. 18 U.S.C. S: 1001 et seq. See also 47 C.F.R. S: 1.17. P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. S: 552a(e)(3). Federal Communications Commission 3 Federal Communications Commission References 1. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-314039A1.pdf 2. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-314039A1.doc
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-314040A1.html
  • shall be subscribed by the declarant as true under penalty of perjury, and dated, in substantially the following form . . . : `I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on (date). (Signature)'." 47 C.F.R. S: 1.16. 18 U.S.C. S: 1001 et seq. See also 47 C.F.R. S: 1.17. P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. S: 552a(e)(3). Federal Communications Commission 2 Federal Communications Commission References 1. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-314040A1.pdf 2. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-314040A1.doc
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-314041A1.html
  • shall be subscribed by the declarant as true under penalty of perjury, and dated, in substantially the following form . . . : `I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on (date). (Signature)'." 47 C.F.R. S: 1.16. 18 U.S.C. S: 1001 et seq. See also 47 C.F.R. S: 1.17. P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. S: 552a(e)(3). Federal Communications Commission 3 Federal Communications Commission References 1. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-314041A1.pdf 2. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-314041A1.doc
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-314042A1.html
  • shall be subscribed by the declarant as true under penalty of perjury, and dated, in substantially the following form . . . : `I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on (date). (Signature)'." 47 C.F.R. S: 1.16. 18 U.S.C. S: 1001 et seq. See also 47 C.F.R. S: 1.17. P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. S: 552a(e)(3). Federal Communications Commission 3 Federal Communications Commission References 1. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-314042A1.pdf 2. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-314042A1.doc
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/News_Releases/nrsbc1016.html http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/News_Releases/nrsbc1016.pdf
  • Commission. The Commission also found that SBC's loop qualification system, as it operated when the Commission approved the Kansas/Oklahoma application, did not violate section 271 of the Communications Act. Based on its investigation, however, the Commission did find that SBC appears to be liable for other apparent violations. Specifically, the Commission found that: 1. SBC appears to have violated section 1.17 of the Commission's Rules by intentionally misrepresenting information to the Enforcement Bureau during the investigation. The Commission proposed a fine of $120,000 for this apparent violation. 2. SBC appears to have violated section 1.65 of the Commission's Rules when it failed to notify the Commission in a timely manner that the information in the affidavits was inaccurate. For this, the
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2001/da012591.html http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2001/da012591.pdf
  • FOR FORFEITURE Adopted: November 6, 2001 Released: November 7, 2001 By the Chief, Investigations and Hearings Division, Enforcement Bureau: I. Introduction 1. In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture we find that Northeast Utilities failed to disclose in multiple applications filed with the Commission that it had been convicted of felonies, in apparent willful and repeated violation of Section 1.17 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 1.17. We conclude that that Northeast Utilities is apparently liable for a forfeiture in the amount of $20,000. II. Background 2. On September 27, 1999, Northeast Utilities Service Company, a subsidiary of Northeast Utilities, pleaded guilty to six counts of violating the Clean Water Act. On the same day, Northeast Nuclear Energy Company, another
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2001/fcc01308.html http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2001/fcc01308.pdf
  • of section 1.65 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 1.65; (2) apparently making a misrepresentation or a willful material omission bearing on a matter within the jurisdiction of the Commission in a written statement submitted by SBC in connection with the investigation into the filing of the incorrect affidavits in the Kansas/Oklahoma section 271 proceeding, in apparent violation of section 1.17 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. 1.17; and (3) apparently failing to comply with the terms of a consent decree that resolved an earlier investigation of SBC involving analogous issues and required SBC to train certain employees on Commission rules relating to contacts with the agency.2 3. Based on these findings, we find SBC apparently liable for a forfeiture in
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2002/DA-02-336A1.html
  • ) NAL/Acct. Number: Licensee of Various Land Mobile ) 20023208002 and Microwave Licenses ) FCC Registration Number: 0003-7750-53 FORFEITURE ORDER Adopted: March 11, 2002 Released: March 12, 2002 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: I. INTRODUCTION 1. In this Forfeiture Order, we issue a monetary forfeiture in the amount of $5,500 against Northeast Utilities for having willfully and repeatedly violated Section 1.17 of the Commission's rules.1 The violations relate to Northeast Utilities' failure in three applications filed with the Commission to properly disclose that it had been convicted of felonies. II. BACKGROUND 2. On September 27, 1999, Northeast Utilities Service Company, a subsidiary of Northeast Utilities, pleaded guilty to six counts of violating the Clean Water Act. On the same day, Northeast
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2002/FCC-02-112A1.html
  • Liability for Forfeiture, 7 FCC Rcd 3378, 3379 (Mass Media Bureau 1992) (noting that a forfeiture in the ``full amount . . . allowed by law'' was to be imposed because the company's reply ``included only non-notarized statements . . . although [the Mass Media Bureau] had requested notarized affidavits''). 29 The fact that 18 U.S.C. 1001 and 47 C.F.R. 1.17 require SBC to tell the truth does not, as SBC suggests, render an attestation superfluous. See NAL Response at 16, 28. Requiring submission of an attestation may elicit a higher level of care and attention than the level that answers unaccompanied by verification may prompt. Attestations can be necessary to attain the level of reliability that we require to enforce
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2002/FCC-02-142A1.html
  • who were involved in the preparation and review of the August 6, 2001 letter knew on or around July 16, 2001 that E-OTD-capable handsets would not be available before the initial launch of GSM service in Seattle. 16. The Enforcement Bureau continues to investigate this matter to determine whether AT&T Wireless may have engaged in misrepresentation in violation of Section 1.17 of the Rules.47 The base amount for any forfeiture for a violation of Section 1.17 is $120,000, the statutory maximum.48 In order to expedite any enforcement action that may be appropriate at the conclusion of the Bureau's investigation of this matter, for the limited purposes of this matter, we delegate authority to the Chief, Enforcement Bureau, to issue a Notice
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2002/FCC-02-153A1.html
  • NAL/Acct. No.200132080059 ) FRN Nos. 0004-3051- 24 SBC Communications, Inc. ) 0004- 3335-71 ) 0005-1937- 01 ORDER Adopted: May 22, 2002 Released: May 28, 2002 By the Commission: 1. The Commission has been conducting two investigations into potential violations by SBC Communications, Inc. (``SBC'') of sections 251 and 271 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``the Act''),1 sections 1.17 and 1.65 of the Commission's Rules,2 and the requirements of the SBC/SNET Consent Decree.3 These investigations focused on competitors' access to SBC's operations support systems (``OSS'') and information SBC provided to the Commission as part of its section 271 applications.4 The Commission and SBC have negotiated the terms of a Consent Decree that will terminate these investigations. A copy of
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2002/FCC-02-173A1.html
  • violated Section 220(e) of the Act by not filing true and accurate data in FCC Form 499-A; (k) to determine whether the Publix Companies engaged in a pervasive pattern of misrepresentation or lack of candor; (l) to determine whether the Publix Companies misrepresented or willfully omitted facts in written materials submitted to the Commission, in violation of 47 C.F.R. Section 1.17; (m) to determine whether, with respect to the issues (a) through (l) specified above, the Publix Companies knew or should have known that they were committing such violations, whether they acted with the intention of violating a known duty; and whether they acted negligently, or with gross neglect of a known duty; (n) to determine whether the Publix Companies substantially
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2002/FCC-02-186A1.html
  • of the Commission's rules by failing to disclose certain information in the AT&T Complaint proceeding.13 Because we deny AT&T's claims that Beehive's access revenue-sharing arrangement was unlawful, the condition precedent pled by Beehive has not been satisfied, and thus we dismiss Beehive's claims under sections 201(b), 203, and 228 of the Act. In addition, we deny Beehive's claims under sections 1.17 and 1.729(b) of the Commission's rules, because Beehive has failed to meet its burden of demonstrating that AT&T deliberately failed to disclose material information in the AT&T Complaint proceeding. II. BACKGROUND 4. At all relevant times, Beehive was an incumbent local exchange carrier (``LEC'') located in rural Utah and Nevada that served approximately 700 access lines.14 Beehive provided local exchange
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2002/FCC-02-283A1.html
  • EB-02-TS-018 ) NAL/Acct. No. 200232100002 ) FRN 0003-7665-32 ORDER Adopted: October 8, 2002 Released: October 9, 2002 By the Commission: 1. In this Order, we adopt a Consent Decree terminating the above-captioned proceeding1 regarding possible violations by AT&T Wireless Services, Inc. (``AT&T Wireless'') of the enhanced 911 (``E911'') Phase II provisions of Section 20.18 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''),2 Sections 1.17 and 1.65 of the Rules,3 and the supplemental filing requirement set forth in the Commission order granting AT&T Wireless a waiver of the E911 Phase II rules for its Global System for Mobile Communications/General Packet Radio Service network.4 2. The Commission and AT&T Wireless have negotiated the terms of a Consent Decree that would resolve this matter and terminate the
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2003/DA-03-2598A1.html
  • August 11, 2003 Released: August 12, 2003 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: 1. In this Order, we adopt the attached Consent Decree entered into between the Enforcement Bureau and Ralph H. Tyler (``Tyler''). The Consent Decree terminates an investigation by the Enforcement Bureau into whether Tyler misrepresented facts to, or lacked candor with, the Commission regarding Station KTSH(FM), violated Sections 1.17 and/or 73.1015 of the Commission's rules1 and engaged in related misconduct. 2. The Enforcement Bureau and Tyler have negotiated the terms of a Consent Decree that would resolve this matter and terminate the investigation. A copy of the Consent Decree is attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. 3. Based upon the record before us, and in light of Tyler's
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2003/DA-03-2598A2.html
  • margins will not be preserved in the text version. If you need the complete document, download the Microsoft Word or Adobe Acrobat version. ***************************************************************** CONSENT DECREE I. Introduction 1. The Enforcement Bureau of the Federal Communications Commission and Ralph H. Tyler hereby enter into a Consent Decree resolving conduct by Tyler regarding Station KTSH(FM), Tishomingo, Oklahoma, in violation of Sections 1.17 and/or 73.1015 of the Commission's rules.1 2. For purposes of this Consent Decree, the following definitions shall apply: (a) ``Act'' means the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. 151 et seq.; (b) ``Adopting Order'' means an Order of the Bureau adopting the terms and conditions of this Consent Decree; (c) ``Bureau'' means the FCC's Enforcement Bureau; (d) ``Commission''
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2003/DA-03-2721A1.html
  • (``the Federal Communications Commission reminds parties to our proceedings and their attorneys that our rules prohibit the filing of frivolous pleadings or pleadings filed for the purpose of delay in proceedings before the Commission or its staff.''). 12 See In re Mercury PCS II, LLC, 2000, 15 FCC Rcd 14559, 14563 (2000). 13 Response at 4. 14 See 47 C.F.R. 1.17. 15 Liberty Cable Co., Inc., 15 FCC Rcd 25050, 25071 (2000), recon. denied, 16 FCC Rcd 16105 (2001), citing Swan Creek Communications v. FCC, 39 F.3d 1217, 1222 (D.C. Cir. 1994); Sea Island Broadcasting Corp. v. FCC, 627 F.2d 240, 243 (D.C. Cir. 1980), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 834 (1980). See also Contemporary Media, Inc., et al. v. FCC, 214
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2004/DA-04-2437A1.html
  • Bureau: By: David H. Solomon Chief, Enforcement Bureau For Blackstone~NEY Ultrasonics, Inc.: By: Eugene Phaneuf President Blackstone~NEY Ultrasonics, Inc. COMPLIANCE PLAN I. PERSONNEL AND TRAINING 1. Compliance Officer Blackstone~NEY will appoint a Regulatory Compliance Officer (``Compliance Officer''), who will administer the compliance program described below. The Compliance Officer will also supervise Blackstone~NEY's compliance with Parts 2 and 18 and Section 1.17 of the FCC's Rules and the requirements of the Consent Decree. 2. Written Advisory Within 45 days of the Effective Date of the Consent Decree, the Compliance Officer will send a written advisory on Parts 2 and 18 of the FCC's Rules, Section 1.17 of the FCC's Rules, and the requirements of the Consent Decree to each officer and employee
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2004/DA-04-3569A1.html
  • . . .''). 12 Answer, Exhibit M (Interconnection Agreement) at Part 13.0 (VZ 002153-54). The Interconnection Agreement defines ``Collocation'' as ``an arrangement in which the equipment of [Broadview] is installed and maintained at the premises of Verizon for the purpose of Interconnection with Verizon and access to the unbundled Network Element[s] of Verizon.'' Answer, Exhibit M (Interconnection Agreement) at Part 1.17 (VZ 002101). 13 Answer, Exhibit M (Interconnection Agreement) at Part 13.1 (VZ 002153). The Interconnection Agreement defines ``Tariff'' as ``any applicable federal or state tariff of a Party, as may be amended by the Party from time to time, under which a Party offers a particular service, facility, or arrangement.'' Answer, Exhibit M (Interconnection Agreement) at Part 1.79 (VZ 002108).
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2005/DA-05-1633A1.html
  • package was not mentioned in the Station's promotions about the contest. See October Response at Exhibit 1, 2. Capstar fails to provide any explanation for these opposing statements and has not provided audio tapes or transcripts of the contest advertisements. 22 See Complaint at 1; Initial Response at 1 (attaching contest rules, which state ``prize value: $30,000 (approx.).'' 23 Section 1.17 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 1.17, prohibits licensees from submitting to the Commission written and oral statements of fact that are intentionally incorrect or misleading and written statements of fact that are made without a reasonable basis for believing that the statements of fact are correct and not misleading. In this case, the affidavit of Sarah Hannon, submitted with
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2005/DA-05-1641A1.html
  • had actually paid for Petitioners' airfare. CBS Opposition at 1. We note that this error was contained in the Declaration of Map Marketing Vice President Pat Ranier and relied on by CBS. Petitioners have provided no evidence suggesting that CBS knew or should have known of the error when it submitted the Declaration with its LOI Response. See 47 C.F.R. 1.17 (imposing duty on respondents to have a reasonable basis for material factual statements to the Commission). Accordingly, we deny Petitioners' request that we should impose a sanction against CBS for this error. 20 See Dena Pictures, Inc. et al, Memorandum Opinion and Order, 71 FCC 2d 1402, 1409, 15 (1979) (Commission rejected allegation of a violation of the contest rule
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2005/DA-05-2785A1.html
  • declarant is attesting. All such declarations provided should comply with section 1.16 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 1.16, and be substantially in the form set forth therein. To knowingly and willfully make any false statement or conceal any material fact in reply to this inquiry is punishable by fine or imprisonment. See 18 U.S.C. 1001; see also 47 C.F.R. 1.17. Failure to respond appropriately to a Bureau LOI constitutes a violation of the Communications Act and our rules. See SBC Communications, Inc., Order of Forfeiture, 17 FCC Rcd 7589 (2002); Globcom Inc., Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture and Order, 18 FCC Rcd 19893, n. 36 (2003) ); World Communications Satellite Systems, Inc., Forfeiture Order, 19 FCC Rcd 2718 (Enf.
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2005/FCC-05D-01A1.html
  • 126.) Her explanation for having represented that the stations as the only valuable asset was reasonable if she "was referring to businesses as opposed to real estate property that [her] parents owned." Her explanation is plausible, and she corrected the record. 41. A misrepresentation or lack of candor requires "an actual intent to deceive the Commission." See Amendment of Section 1.17, 18 FCC Rcd 4016, 4020 (2003). "Material" is defined as "important" or "having influence or effect;" and a "material misrepresentation is defined as "one relating to matter which is so substantial or important as to influence the party to whom it is made." 18 FCC Rcd at 4020 n. 4. What is necessary to find in order to have "disqualifying
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2006/DA-06-1646A1.html
  • Satellites FRN No. 0013088984 ) ) NOTICE OF APPARENT LIABILITY FOR FORFEITURE Adopted: August 16, 2006 Released: August 16, 2006 By the Chief, Investigations and Hearings Division, Enforcement Bureau: I. INTRODUCTION 1. In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture ("NAL"), we find that Intelsat North America LLC ("Intelsat"), licensee of various C-band and Ku-band Geostationary Satellites, apparently violated Section 1.17 of the Commission's rules (relating to truthful and accurate statements to the Commission) by making incorrect and/or misleading certifications without a reasonable basis for doing so in an application to relocate one of its satellites. Specifically, Intelsat erroneously certified to the Commission that it was relocating a satellite to 178.0'0 E.L. and that the satellite's operation at that location would
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2006/DA-06-2554A1.html
  • adjustment in a forfeiture. 22. Finally, CRC argues that the proposed forfeiture should be reduced because "CRC has no prior history of noncompliance with applicable FCC regulations." The president of CRC, James Kay, however, does have a history of noncompliance. In a prior proceeding, the Commission found that Kay deliberately withheld material information from the Commission, in violation of Section 1.17 of the Rules, and issued a forfeiture of $10,000 to Kay. Because of Kay's previous noncompliance, we are unable to find that CRC has a history of compliance with the Rules. 23. We have examined CRC's response to the NAL pursuant to the statutory factors above, and in conjunction with the Forfeiture Policy Statement. As a result of our review,
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2006/DA-06-617A1.html
  • No. EB-05-IH-0717 ) KOCH INDUSTRIES, INC. NAL/Acct. No. ) 200632080151 Ultimate Parent Company of Licensees of Various Authorizations in the Private ) FRN No. 0005865258 Land Mobile Radio Services ) ) ORDER Adopted: March 22, 2006 Released: March 23, 2006 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: 1. The Enforcement Bureau has been investigating compliance by Koch Industries, Inc. ("Koch") with Section 1.17 of the Commission's rules, relating to truthful and accurate statements to the Commission in license applications filed by entities of which Koch is the ultimate parent company. 2. The Bureau and Koch have negotiated the terms of a Consent Decree, a copy of which is attached hereto and incorporated by reference. After reviewing the terms of the Consent Decree, we
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2006/DA-06-617A2.html
  • document, download the Microsoft Word or Adobe Acrobat version. ***************************************************************** CONSENT DECREE 1. The Enforcement Bureau of the Federal Communications Commission and Koch Industries, Inc. hereby enter into this Consent Decree for the purpose of resolving the Enforcement Bureau's investigation of compliance by Koch Industries, Inc., and entities of which Koch Industries, Inc. is the ultimate parent company, with Section 1.17 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. S 1.17. 2. For purposes of this Consent Decree, the following definitions shall apply: a. "Act" means the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. S 151 et seq. b. "Adopting Order" means an order of the Bureau, adopting this Consent Decree, without any modifications adverse to Koch. c. "Any" shall be construed
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2006/DA-06-655A1.html
  • All such declarations provided should comply with section 1.16 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. S 1.16, and be substantially in the form set forth therein. To knowingly and willfully make any false statement or conceal any material fact in reply to this inquiry is punishable by fine or imprisonment. See 18 U.S.C. S 1001; see also 47 C.F.R. S 1.17. Failure to respond appropriately to a Bureau LOI constitutes a violation of the Communications Act and our rules. See SBC Communications, Inc., Order of Forfeiture, 17 FCC Rcd 7589 (2002); Globcom Inc., Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture and Order, 18 FCC Rcd 19893, n. 36 (2003) ); World Communications Satellite Systems, Inc., Forfeiture Order, 19 FCC Rcd 2718 (Enf.
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2006/FCC-06-124A1.html
  • to Show Cause, Notice of Opportunity for Hearing, and Hearing Designation Order, 18 FCC Rcd 14938, 14964-65, P101 (2004); Family Broadcasting, Inc (WSTX(AM)/WSTX-FM), Order to Show Cause and Notice of Opportunity for Hearing, 16 FCC Rcd 4330, 4335 P 13, 4337, P 17 (2001) recon denied, 16 FCC Rcd 12810 (2001). 47 C.F.R. S 73.1015. See also 47 C.F.R. S 1.17. 47 U.S.C. SS312, 309(k)(2); Character Policy Statement, 102 FCC 2d 1179 (1986). See Character Policy Statement, 102 FCC 2d at 1210-11, PP 58-62. Id. A false certification may also constitute a misrepresentation. See, e.g., San Francisco Unified School District (KALW(FM)), Hearing Designation Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture, 19 FCC Rcd 13326, 13334, P 19 nn. 40-41 (2004),
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2006/FCC-06-128A1.html
  • the following issues: 1. to determine the effect of Mr. Doty's felony convictions on his qualifications to be and to remain a Commission licensee; 2. to determine the effect of Mr. Doty's felony convictions on the qualifications of CRS to be and to remain a Commission licensee; 3. to determine whether CRS made misrepresentations and/or lacked candor and/or violated Section 1.17 of the Commission's rules regarding the felony convictions of Mr. Doty in any applications filed with the Commission; 4. to determine whether CRS failed to timely amend Commission applications to disclose Mr. Doty's felony convictions, in violation of Section 1.65 of the Commission's rules; 5. to determine whether CRS made false certifications in any applications filed with the Commission; 6.
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2006/FCC-06-13A1.html
  • that, since January of 2000, it imported, marketed and distributed for sale at least 66 different models of digital devices. A listing of these 66 models is included in Attachment A. Behringer further stated that, from January 2000 through April 2004, it manufactured approximately 1.33 million of its digital devices for sale in the United States,14 and actually imported approximately 1.17 million of its digital devices, which it distributed to approximately 2,000 retailers for sale in the United States.15 6. Behringer acknowledged that its audio products are Class B digital devices subject to the Commission's equipment verification and related requirements,16 including the applicable technical standards.17 Behringer also acknowledged that it had not verified compliance of any of the 66 models of
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2007/DA-07-4679A1.html
  • Earth FRN No. 0014170831 Station ) ) FORFEITURE ORDER Adopted: November 19, 2007 Released: November 20, 2007 By the Chief, Investigations and Hearings Division, Enforcement Bureau: I. INTRODUCTION 1. In this Forfeiture Order, we find that C5 Communications, LLC ("C5 Communications" or the "Company"), Applicant for Special Temporary Authority ("STA") to Operate a 1.0 meter Ku-Band Earth Station, violated Section 1.17 of the Federal Communications Commission's (the "Commission" or "FCC") rules by twice using a false name to certify the accuracy of certain matters to the Commission in the STA applications it filed with the Commission. For the reasons explained below, we conclude that C5 Communications is liable for a forfeiture in the amount of seventeen thousand five hundred dollars ($17,500).
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2007/DA-07-4876A1.html
  • in the NAL Account No. Coast and Ground, Land Mobile, and ) 200732080027 Microwave Radio Services ) ) ORDER Adopted: December 6, 2007 Released: December 7, 2007 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: 1. In this Order, we adopt a Consent Decree terminating an investigation by the Enforcement Bureau (the "Bureau") into compliance by BP Exploration (Alaska), Inc. ("BPXA"), with Section 1.17 of the Commission's Rules. 2. The Bureau and BPXA have negotiated the terms of a Consent Decree that would terminate the Bureau's investigation. A copy of the Consent Decree is attached hereto. 3. We have reviewed the terms of the Consent Decree and evaluated the facts before us. We believe that the public interest would be served by approving the
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2007/DA-07-4992A1.html
  • $6,000 forfeiture for violation of Section 72.1216 in a single contest) (forfeiture paid); AMFM Radio Licenses LLC, et al, Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture, 19 FCC Rcd 5005 (2004) (maximum forfeiture imposed for each of multiple indecency rule violations) (forfeiture paid). See 47 U.S.C. S: 503(b). See 47 C.F.R. S:S: 0.111, 0.311 and 1.80. See 47 C.F.R. S:S: 73.1216, 1.17 and 73.1015. See 47 C.F.R. S: 1.1914. For purposes of the forfeiture proceeding initiated by this NAL, Multicultural Radio Broadcasting Licensee, LLC shall be the only party to this proceeding. (Continued from previous page) (continued....) Federal Communications Commission DA 07-4992 1 2 Federal Communications Commission DA 07-4992 References 1. http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4992A1.pdf 2. http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4992A1.doc
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2007/FCC-07-100A1.html
  • Forfeiture ("NAL") proposing a $1,000,000 forfeiture against Behringer for its apparent willful and repeated violation of the equipment marketing restrictions and related requirements. 5. Specifically, the NAL found that since January 2000, Behringer has imported and marketed in the United States 66 models of unauthorized digital audio music devices. Between January 2000 and March 2004, Behringer imported and distributed approximately 1.17 million such devices for sale in the United States. The NAL further found that between April 2004 and February 2005 Behringer continued to import and market unauthorized devices, even though it had previously represented to the Enforcement Bureau in response to the first letter of inquiry ("LOI") that it had initiated compliance measures. In this regard, during the one-year period
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2007/FCC-07-125A1.html
  • have been required under Section 310(d) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended and Section 1.948 of the Commission's Rules. Questions about the corporate composition of PCSI and whether control of the company was transferred without prior Commission consent require further inquiry at hearing, as specified in the Ordering Clauses below. A. Misrepresentation and Lack of Candor 34. Section 1.17 of the Commission's Rules prohibits misrepresentations and lack of candor in Commission filings. "The bedrock requirement for absolute truth and candor from a Commission licensee or from a licensee or applicant is, simply stated, this agency's quintessential regulatory demand." Material misrepresentations to the Commission or an intentional lack of candor with respect to matters affecting an applicant's basic eligibility status
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2007/FCC-07-175A1.html
  • in such circumstances, and it seeks a declaration that Farmers' tariffed rates are "void ab initio," thereby entitling Qwest to a damages award. 27. We decline to rule as Qwest requests. As an initial matter, Qwest contends that factual statements Farmers made to the Commission in support of its tariff filing were "incorrect" and/or "misleading," in violation of Commission rule 1.17(a)(1) and (2), because Farmers failed to disclose its purported plan to increase interstate access volumes. Under the Commission's rules, Farmers was required to report its historical cost and demand figures, which the Commission determined are "likely to be a close and unbiased substitute for prospective data." In fact, the Commission specifically declined to include a requirement that carriers provide any
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2008/DA-08-1920A1.html
  • CO 80021. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Kris Anne Monteith Chief, Enforcement Bureau 47 C.F.R. S: 9.5(b). In a companion decision issued concurrently with this NAL, we propose a forfeiture of $25,000 against Cardinal for willfully providing incorrect material factual information to the Commission without a reasonable basis for believing that the information was correct and accurate in apparent violation of Section 1.17 of the Rules. Cardinal Broadband LLC, Notice of Apparent Liability, DA 08-1921 (Enf. Bur., rel. August 15, 2008). An interconnected VoIP service is a service that: (1) enables real-time, two-way voice communications; (2) requires a broadband connection from the user's location; (3) requires Internet Protocol-compatible customer premises equipment; and (4) permits users generally to receive calls that originate on the
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2008/DA-08-1921A1.html
  • August 15, 2008 Released: August 15, 2008 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: I. introduction 1. In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture ("NAL"), we find Cardinal Broadband, LLC, aka Sovereign Telecommunications, a wholly owned subsidiary of Cardinal Communications, Inc. (hereinafter, "Cardinal"), apparently liable for a forfeiture in the amount of twenty-five thousand dollars ($25,000) for willful violation of Section 1.17(a)(2) of the Commission's Rules ("Rules"). The noted apparent violation involves Cardinal's provision of incorrect material factual information to the Commission without a reasonable basis for believing that the information was correct and accurate. II. BACKGROUND 2. On July 13, 2007, the Commission received a complaint alleging that Cardinal, an interconnected Voice over Internet Protocol ("VoIP") service provider, was not providing
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2008/DA-08-410A1.html
  • Partnership, Memorandum Opinion and Order, 17 FCC Rcd 21861, 21863-64 (2002) ("Eure"); MTD, Inc., Memorandum Opinion and Order, 6 FCC Rcd 34, 35 (1991); Wagenvoord Broadcasting Co., Memorandum Opinion and Order, 35 FCC 2d 361 (1972). See Eure, 17 FCC Rcd at 21863-64; Triad Broadcasting Company, Inc., Memorandum Opinion and Order, 96 FCC 2d 1235, 1244 (1984). See 47 C.F.R. S:1.17. See Southern California, 7 FCC Rcd at 3455 (a licensee's "frank" response to a letter of inquiry did not warrant a downward adjustment as "complete candor" is required). 47 C.F.R. S:S: 0.111, 0.311, 1.80(f)(4). (Continued from previous page) (continued....) Federal Communications Commission DA 08-410 4 Federal Communications Commission DA 08-410 References 1. http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-410A1.pdf 2. http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-410A1.doc
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2008/DA-08-563A1.html
  • for a downward adjustment in a forfeiture. Finally, the Region found that, contrary to CRC's request for a reduction based on CRC's history of compliance with the Rules, the president of CRC, James Kay, had a history of noncompliance. Specifically, in a prior proceeding, the Commission found that Kay deliberately withheld material information from the Commission, in violation of Section 1.17 of the Rules, and issued a forfeiture of $10,000 to Kay. Because of Kay's previous noncompliance, the Region declined to find that CRC has a history of compliance with the Rules. III. DISCUSSION 14. Reconsideration is appropriate only where the petitioner either demonstrates a material error or omission in the underlying order or raises additional facts not known or not
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2008/DA-08-778A1.html
  • Sprint engaged in unreasonable and discriminatory practices in violation of sections 201(b) and 202 of the Communications Act by refusing to provide service through the toll-free telephone numbers 800-AMERICA and 888-AMERICA; and (2) Sprint engaged in misrepresentation to the Federal Communications Commission in its response to DeMoss's informal complaint, in violation of 18 U.S.C. section 1001 and 47 C.F.R. section 1.17. DeMoss further requested a separate damages proceeding under 47 C.F.R. section 1.722(d). III. DISCUSSION 1. It is well established that the complainant has the burden of proof in a formal complaint proceeding under section 208 of the Act. Thus, to prevail, a complainant must demonstrate by a preponderance of the evidence that the alleged violation of the Act or the
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2008/FCC-08-109A1.html
  • reception capability. In addition, we propose a forfeiture in the amount of eleven thousand dollars ($11,000) against Syntax-Brillian for providing to the Commission, during the course of staff's investigation of its violations of the DTV tuner requirement, material factual information that is incorrect without a reasonable basis for believing the material factual information was correct, in willful violation of Section 1.17(a)(2) of the Rules. II. background 2. The Commission adopted the DTV reception capability requirement in 2002. That requirement, which also is often termed the "DTV tuner requirement," requires that all new television broadcast receivers that are imported into the United States or shipped in interstate commerce be capable of receiving the signals of DTV broadcast stations over-the-air. The DTV tuner
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2008/FCC-08-163A1.html
  • Forfeiture ("NAL") by the Commission against Funai for possible violations of Section 330(c) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, ("Act"), Section 15.120(d)(2) of the Commission's Rules ("Rules"), regarding Funai's apparent interstate shipment, after March 15, 2006, of digital television receivers that do not comply with the Commission's rules regarding program blocking technology requirements for televisions receivers, and Section 1.17 of the Rules regarding Funai's apparent inaccurate statements to the Commission. 2. The Commission and Funai have negotiated the terms of the Consent Decree that resolve this matter. A copy of the Consent Decree is attached hereto and incorporated by reference. 3. After reviewing the terms of the Consent Decree and evaluating the facts before us, we find that the
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2008/FCC-08-187A1.html
  • not comply with the Commission's rules regarding digital television ("DTV") reception capability. Additionally, we find Invision apparently liable for a forfeiture in the amount of $4,000 for providing to the Commission, during the course of its investigation, material factual information that is incorrect without a reasonable basis for believing the material factual information was correct, in willful violation of Section 1.17(a)(2) of the Rules. In light of evidence that the company has continued to import and ship interstate television receivers in violation of our rules, we further order Invision to submit a report within 10 days of release of this NAL certifying that it has ceased all such unlawful conduct. II. Background 2. The Commission adopted the DTV reception capability requirement
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2008/FCC-08-252A1.html
  • the "Percent of interest held" field and that "an incorrect figure was inadvertently entered in that field." Application for Review at 4. We remind Evangelism that it is required to use due diligence in providing correct and non-misleading information to the Commission, including taking steps to determine the truthfulness of what is being submitted. See 47 C.F.R. S:S: 73.1015 and 1.17. We caution Evangelism that a failure to submit truthful and accurate statements to the Commission pursuant to Section 73.1015 of the Rules, 47 C.F.R. S: 73.1015, could lead to the imposition of a monetary forfeiture pursuant to 47 U.S.C. S: 503(b), license revocation pursuant to 47 U.S.C. S: 312 and/or criminal sanctions under 18 U.S.C. S: 1001. In relying on
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2009/DA-09-1198A1.html
  • did not contain any certification information or other information from the Shenzhen Grant or CIC Grant. 47 C.F.R. S: 2.925, 47 C.F.R. S: 2.803(a)(1). Any false statement made knowingly and willfully in reply to this inquiry is punishable by fine or imprisonment under Title 18 of the U.S. Code. 18 U.S.C. S:S: 1001 et seq; see also 47 C.F.R. S: 1.17. 47 U.S.C. S:S: 302a(b), 503(b), 47 C.F.R. S:S: 0.111, 0.311, 1.80(f)(4), 2.803(a)(1). 47 U.S.C. S: 403. 47 U.S.C. S: 504(a). Federal Communications Commission DA 09-1198 1 1 Federal Communications Commission DA 09-1198 References 1. http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1198A1.pdf 2. http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1198A1.doc
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2009/DA-09-119A1.html
  • in the Section 503(b) context. See, e.g., Southern California Broadcasting Co., Memorandum Opinion and Order, 6 FCC Rcd 4387, 4387-88 P: 5 (1991) ("Southern California Broadcasting"). 47 U.S.C. S: 154(i). 47 U.S.C. S: 154(j). 47 U.S.C. S: 403. 47 C.F.R. S: 76.939 ("Cable operators shall comply with ... the Commission's requests for information, orders, and decisions."). See 47 C.F.R. S: 1.17. See, e.g., SBC Communications, Inc., Forfeiture Order, 17 FCC Rcd 7589, 7599-7600 P:P: 23-28 (2002) (ordering $100,000 forfeiture for egregious and intentional failure to certify the response to a Bureau inquiry) ("SBC Forfeiture Order"); Digital Antenna, Inc., Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture and Order, 23 FCC Rcd 7600, 7602 (Spectr. Enf. Div., Enf. Bur. 2008) (proposing $11,000 forfeiture for
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2009/DA-09-147A1.html
  • Inter Tech's marketing of an unauthorized FM broadcast transmitter. In addition, we propose a forfeiture in the amount of eleven thousand dollars ($11,000) against Inter Tech for providing to the Commission, during the course of this investigation, material factual information that is incorrect without a reasonable basis for believing the material factual information was correct, in willful violation of Section 1.17(a)(2) of the Rules. We accordingly propose a total forfeiture of eighteen thousand dollars ($18,000). II. background 2. In response to complaints alleging that Inter Tech was marketing unauthorized FM broadcast transmitters in the United States, the Spectrum Enforcement Division of the Enforcement Bureau ("Division") began an investigation. As part of this investigation, Division Staff reviewed Inter Tech's website on February
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2009/DA-09-1513A1.html
  • 6. We note that in a related matter that the Division issued a Notice of Apparent Liability to Inter Tech for its unauthorized marketing of a single, now discontinued transmitter, the Cybermax FF TX 1, in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act and Section 2.803(a) of the Rules, and for providing incorrect material factual information in violation of Section 1.17(a)(2) of the Rules. The Division action was limited to the discontinued transmitter only and did not address the transmitters subject to this proceeding. See Inter Tech FM, Notice of Apparently Liability for Forfeiture, 24 FCC Rcd 1151 (Enf. Bur., Spectrum Enf. Div. 2009), response pending. See First Response at 4. See also 47 C.F.R. S: 73.1660(a)(1) (requiring AM, FM or
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2009/DA-09-1733A1.html
  • its LOI Response, Jones failed to identify Vystar Credit Union as a nonprofit entity at that time. The Licensee's carelessness in its earlier filing resulted in an inaccurate conclusion in the NAL and wasted government resources. Although we will exclude the Vystar Credit Union announcement from our forfeiture calculation, we admonish Jones for its negligent misrepresentation in violation of Section 1.17 of our Rules, and caution the Licensee to exercise greater care in its responses to the Commission in the future. 13. Finally, Jones asserts that "no penalty should be imposed, and that, should any penalty have been justified, it should have been no more than a nominal amount less than $500." We are unconvinced that either cancellation or a minimal
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2009/DA-09-1958A1.html
  • representative may, in writing, require from any applicant, permittee, or licensee written statements of fact relevant to a determination whether an application should be granted or denied, or to a determination whether a license should be revoked, or to any other matter within the jurisdiction of the Commission" and that any such statements are subject to the provisions of Section 1.17 of the Rules. Section 1.17 of the Rules requires that any person that receives a letter of inquiry from the Commission or its staff "shall not intentionally provide material factual information that is incorrect or intentionally omit material information that is necessary to prevent any material factual statement that is made from being incorrect or misleading." 9. As noted above,
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2009/DA-09-2584A1.html
  • Released: December 14, 2009 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: 1. In this Order, we adopt the attached Consent Decree entered into between the Enforcement Bureau and BNSF Railway Company ("BNSF"). The Consent Decree terminates an investigation by the Bureau of BNSF's compliance with Section 310(d) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, relating to assignments of licenses, and Section 1.17 of the Commission's Rules, relating to truthful statements to the Commission. 2. The Bureau and BNSF have negotiated the terms of the Consent Decree that resolve this matter. A copy of the Consent Decree is attached hereto and incorporated by reference. 3. After reviewing the terms of the Consent Decree and evaluating the facts before us, we find that the
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2009/DA-09-2584A2.html
  • No. 0004772877 ) CONSENT DECREE 1. The Enforcement Bureau of the Federal Communications Commission and BNSF Railway Company, by their authorized representatives, hereby enter into this Consent Decree for the purpose of resolving the Enforcement Bureau's investigation of compliance by BNSF Railway Company with Section 310(d) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. S: 310(d), and Sections 1.17 and 1.948 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. S:S: 1.17, 1.948. I. DEFINITIONS 2. For purposes of this Consent Decree, the following definitions shall apply: a. "Act" means the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. S: 151 et seq. b. "Adopting Order" means an order of the Bureau adopting this Consent Decree without any modifications adverse to BNSF
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2009/DA-09-51A1.html
  • whether or when it was actually utilized. Id. Being uncertain whether the purported revision was ever substituted for the earlier promotional text, we will not consider PRC's broadcast of any of the post-September 2004 Rockin' Tomato Pizza Co. announcements in conjunction with our determination of the forfeiture amount. See generally, November 17th Reply. See id.; see also 47 C.F.R. S: 1.17. See September 13th Response at 5-6. See id. See id. See 47 U.S.C. S: 503(b); 47 C.F.R S: 1.80. The Commission's Forfeiture Policy Statement and Amendment of Section 1.80 of the Rules to Incorporate the Forfeiture Guidelines, 12 FCC Rcd 17087, 17115 (1997) ("Forfeiture Policy Statement"), recon. denied 15 FCC Rcd 303 (1999); 47 C.F.R. S: 1.80(b). 47 U.S.C. S:
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2009/DA-09-79A1.html
  • in the Section 503(b) context. See, e.g., Southern California Broadcasting Co., Memorandum Opinion and Order, 6 FCC Rcd 4387, 4387-88 P: 5 (1991) ("Southern California Broadcasting"). 47 U.S.C. S: 154(i). 47 U.S.C. S: 154(j). 47 U.S.C. S: 403. 47 C.F.R. S: 76.939 ("Cable operators shall comply with ... the Commission's requests for information, orders, and decisions."). See 47 C.F.R. S: 1.17. See, e.g., SBC Communications, Inc., Forfeiture Order, 17 FCC Rcd 7589, 7599-7600 P:P: 23-28 (ordering $100,000 forfeiture for egregious and intentional failure to certify the response to a Bureau inquiry) ("SBC Forfeiture Order"); Globcom, Inc., Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture and Order, 18 FCC Rcd 19893, 19898 n. 36 (2003) (noting delayed response to an LOI is considered dilatory
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2009/DA-09-80A1.html
  • in the Section 503(b) context. See, e.g., Southern California Broadcasting Co., Memorandum Opinion and Order, 6 FCC Rcd 4387, 4387-88 P: 5 (1991) ("Southern California Broadcasting"). 47 U.S.C. S: 154(i). 47 U.S.C. S: 154(j). 47 U.S.C. S: 403. 47 C.F.R. S: 76.939 ("Cable operators shall comply with ... the Commission's requests for information, orders, and decisions."). See 47 C.F.R. S: 1.17. See, e.g., SBC Communications, Inc., Forfeiture Order, 17 FCC Rcd 7589, 7599-7600 P:P: 23-28 (2002) (ordering $100,000 forfeiture for egregious and intentional failure to certify the response to a Bureau inquiry) ("SBC Forfeiture Order"); Digital Antenna, Inc., Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture and Order, 23 FCC Rcd 7600, 7602 (Spectr. Enf. Div., Enf. Bur. 2008) (proposing $11,000 forfeiture for
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2009/DA-09-81A1.html
  • in the Section 503(b) context. See, e.g., Southern California Broadcasting Co., Memorandum Opinion and Order, 6 FCC Rcd 4387, 4387-88 P: 5 (1991) ("Southern California Broadcasting"). 47 U.S.C. S: 154(i). 47 U.S.C. S: 154(j). 47 U.S.C. S: 403. 47 C.F.R. S: 76.939 ("Cable operators shall comply with ... the Commission's requests for information, orders, and decisions."). See 47 C.F.R. S: 1.17. See, e.g., SBC Communications, Inc., Forfeiture Order, 17 FCC Rcd 7589, 7599-7600 P:P: 23-28 (2002) (ordering $100,000 forfeiture for egregious and intentional failure to certify the response to a Bureau inquiry) ("SBC Forfeiture Order"); Digital Antenna, Inc., Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture and Order, 23 FCC Rcd 7600, 7602 (Spectr. Enf. Div., Enf. Bur. 2008) (proposing $11,000 forfeiture for
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2009/DA-09-82A1.html
  • in the Section 503(b) context. See, e.g., Southern California Broadcasting Co., Memorandum Opinion and Order, 6 FCC Rcd 4387, 4387-88 P: 5 (1991) ("Southern California Broadcasting"). 47 U.S.C. S: 154(i). 47 U.S.C. S: 154(j). 47 U.S.C. S: 403. 47 C.F.R. S: 76.939 ("Cable operators shall comply with ... the Commission's requests for information, orders, and decisions."). See 47 C.F.R. S: 1.17. See, e.g., SBC Communications, Inc., Forfeiture Order, 17 FCC Rcd 7589, 7599-7600 P:P: 23-28 (2002) (ordering $100,000 forfeiture for egregious and intentional failure to certify the response to a Bureau inquiry) ("SBC Forfeiture Order"); Digital Antenna, Inc., Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture and Order, 23 FCC Rcd 7600, 7602 (Spectr. Enf. Div., Enf. Bur. 2008) (proposing $11,000 forfeiture for
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2009/DA-09-83A1.html
  • in the Section 503(b) context. See, e.g., Southern California Broadcasting Co., Memorandum Opinion and Order, 6 FCC Rcd 4387, 4387-88 P: 5 (1991) ("Southern California Broadcasting"). 47 U.S.C. S: 154(i). 47 U.S.C. S: 154(j). 47 U.S.C. S: 403. 47 C.F.R. S: 76.939 ("Cable operators shall comply with ... the Commission's requests for information, orders, and decisions."). See 47 C.F.R. S: 1.17. See, e.g., SBC Communications, Inc., Forfeiture Order, 17 FCC Rcd 7589, 7599-7600 P:P: 23-28 (ordering $100,000 forfeiture for egregious and intentional failure to certify the response to a Bureau inquiry) ("SBC Forfeiture Order"); Digital Antenna, Inc., Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture and Order, 23 FCC Rcd 7600, 7602 (Spectr. Enf. Div., Enf. Bur. 2008) (proposing $11,000 forfeiture for failure
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2009/DA-09-84A1.html
  • in the Section 503(b) context. See, e.g., Southern California Broadcasting Co., Memorandum Opinion and Order, 6 FCC Rcd 4387, 4387-88 P: 5 (1991) ("Southern California Broadcasting"). 47 U.S.C. S: 154(i). 47 U.S.C. S: 154(j). 47 U.S.C. S: 403. 47 C.F.R. S: 76.939 ("Cable operators shall comply with ... the Commission's requests for information, orders, and decisions."). See 47 C.F.R. S: 1.17. See, e.g., SBC Communications, Inc., Forfeiture Order, 17 FCC Rcd 7589, 7599-7600 P:P: 23-28 (ordering $100,000 forfeiture for egregious and intentional failure to certify the response to a Bureau inquiry) ("SBC Forfeiture Order"); Digital Antenna, Inc., Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture and Order, 23 FCC Rcd 7600, 7602 (Spectr. Enf. Div., Enf. Bur. 2008) (proposing $11,000 forfeiture for failure
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2009/DA-09-85A1.html
  • in the Section 503(b) context. See, e.g., Southern California Broadcasting Co., Memorandum Opinion and Order, 6 FCC Rcd 4387, 4387-88 P: 5 (1991) ("Southern California Broadcasting"). 47 U.S.C. S: 154(i). 47 U.S.C. S: 154(j). 47 U.S.C. S: 403. 47 C.F.R. S: 76.939 ("Cable operators shall comply with ... the Commission's requests for information, orders, and decisions."). See 47 C.F.R. S: 1.17. See, e.g., SBC Communications, Inc., Forfeiture Order, 17 FCC Rcd 7589, 7599-7600 P:P: 23-28 (2002) (ordering $100,000 forfeiture for egregious and intentional failure to certify the response to a Bureau inquiry) ("SBC Forfeiture Order"); Digital Antenna, Inc., Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture and Order, 23 FCC Rcd 7600, 7602 (Spectr. Enf. Div., Enf. Bur. 2008) (proposing $11,000 forfeiture for
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2009/DA-09-95A1.html
  • in the Section 503(b) context. See, e.g., Southern California Broadcasting Co., Memorandum Opinion and Order, 6 FCC Rcd 4387, 4387-88 P: 5 (1991) ("Southern California Broadcasting"). 47 U.S.C. S: 154(i). 47 U.S.C. S: 154(j). 47 U.S.C. S: 403. 47 C.F.R. S: 76.939 ("Cable operators shall comply with ... the Commission's requests for information, orders, and decisions."). See 47 C.F.R. S: 1.17. See, e.g., SBC Communications, Inc., Forfeiture Order, 17 FCC Rcd 7589, 7599-7600 P:P: 23-28 (2002) (ordering $100,000 forfeiture for egregious and intentional failure to certify the response to a Bureau inquiry) ("SBC Forfeiture Order"); Digital Antenna, Inc., Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture and Order, 23 FCC Rcd 7600, 7602 (Spectr. Enf. Div., Enf. Bur. 2008) (proposing $11,000 forfeiture for
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2010/DA-10-1268A1.html
  • Section II. Adjustment Criteria for Section 503 Forfeitures. See The Commission's Forfeiture Policy Statement and Amendment of Section 1.80 of the Rules to Incorporate the Forfeiture Guidelines, Report and Order, 12 FCC Rcd 17087 (1997), recon. denied, 15 FCC Rcd 303 (1999) ("Forfeiture Policy Statement"). Forfeiture Policy Statement, 12 FCC Rcd at 17099 P: 22. See id. Amendment of Section 1.17 of the Commission's Rules Concerning Truthful Statements to the Commission, Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, 17 FCC Rcd 3296, 3297 (2002). See also Amendment of Section 1.17 of the Commission's Rules Concerning Truthful Statements to the Commission Report and Order, 18 FCC Rcd 4016, 4021 (2003), recon. denied, Memorandum Opinion and Order, 19 FCC Rcd 5790, further recon. denied, Memorandum Opinion
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2010/DA-10-1975A1.html
  • File No. EB-09-SE-242; Provision of Incorrect Material Factual Information in a Commission Investigation Dear Mr. McCormack: This is an official CITATION, issued pursuant to section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Communications Act"), to Phonejammer.com ("Phonejammer") for providing incorrect, material factual information to the Spectrum Enforcement Division ("Division") of the Enforcement Bureau ("Bureau") in violation of section 1.17(a)(2) of the Commission's rules ("Rules"). Specifically, in response to recent Commission inquiries, Phonejammer claimed that it does not market, and has not shipped or distributed, radio frequency devices designed to intentionally interfere with licensed cellular and Personal Communications Services ("PCS") ("phone jammers") to consumers in the United States. However, these statements are flatly contradicted by record evidence that, as recently
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2010/DA-10-2187A1.html
  • with the Commission. 9. Under the Privacy Act of 1974, any statement or information provided by you may be used by the Commission to determine if further enforcement action is required. Any knowingly or willfully false statement, or concealment of any material fact, made in reply to this Citation is punishable by fine or imprisonment. Please also note that Section 1.17 of the Rules requires that you provide truthful and accurate statements to the Commission. VI. CONTACT INFORMATION 10. The closest FCC Office is the Los Angeles District Office in Cerritos, CA. You may contact this office by telephone, 562-860-7474, to schedule a personal interview, which must take place within thirty (30) days after the release date of this Citation. 11.
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2010/DA-10-2188A1.html
  • with the Commission. 9. Under the Privacy Act of 1974, any statement or information provided by you may be used by the Commission to determine if further enforcement action is required. Any knowingly or willfully false statement, or concealment of any material fact, made in reply to this Citation is punishable by fine or imprisonment. Please also note that Section 1.17 of the Rules requires that you provide truthful and accurate statements to the Commission. VI. CONTACT INFORMATION 10. The closest FCC Office is the Los Angeles District Office in Cerritos, CA. You may contact this office by telephone, 562-860-7474, to schedule a personal interview, which must take place within thirty (30) days after the release date of this Citation. 11.
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2010/DA-10-2189A1.html
  • with the Commission. 9. Under the Privacy Act of 1974, any statement or information provided by you may be used by the Commission to determine if further enforcement action is required. Any knowingly or willfully false statement, or concealment of any material fact, made in reply to this Citation is punishable by fine or imprisonment. Please also note that Section 1.17 of the Rules requires that you provide truthful and accurate statements to the Commission. VI. CONTACT INFORMATION 10. The closest FCC Office is the Los Angeles District Office in Cerritos, CA. You may contact this office by telephone, 562-860-7474, to schedule a personal interview, which must take place within thirty (30) days after the release date of this Citation. 11.
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2010/DA-10-2190A1.html
  • with the Commission. 9. Under the Privacy Act of 1974, any statement or information provided by you may be used by the Commission to determine if further enforcement action is required. Any knowingly or willfully false statement, or concealment of any material fact, made in reply to this Citation is punishable by fine or imprisonment. Please also note that Section 1.17 of the Rules requires that you provide truthful and accurate statements to the Commission. VI. CONTACT INFORMATION 10. The closest FCC Office is the Denver Field Office in Denver, Colorado. You may contact this office by telephone, (303)231-5212, to schedule a personal interview, which must take place within twenty (20) days after the release date of this Citation. 11. Reasonable
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2010/DA-10-2191A1.html
  • with the Commission. 9. Under the Privacy Act of 1974, any statement or information provided by you may be used by the Commission to determine if further enforcement action is required. Any knowingly or willfully false statement, or concealment of any material fact, made in reply to this Citation is punishable by fine or imprisonment. Please also note that Section 1.17 of the Rules requires that you provide truthful and accurate statements to the Commission. VI. CONTACT INFORMATION 10. The closest FCC Office is the Denver Field Office in Denver, Colorado. You may contact this office by telephone, (303)231-5212, to schedule a personal interview, which must take place within twenty (20) days after the release date of this Citation. 11. Reasonable
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2010/DA-10-2192A1.html
  • with the Commission. 9. Under the Privacy Act of 1974, any statement or information provided by you may be used by the Commission to determine if further enforcement action is required. Any knowingly or willfully false statement, or concealment of any material fact, made in reply to this Citation is punishable by fine or imprisonment. Please also note that Section 1.17 of the Rules requires that you provide truthful and accurate statements to the Commission. VI. CONTACT INFORMATION 10. The closest FCC Office is the Denver Field Office in Denver, Colorado. You may contact this office by telephone, (303)231-5212, to schedule a personal interview, which must take place within twenty (20) days after the release date of this Citation. 11. Reasonable
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2010/DA-10-2193A1.html
  • with the Commission. 9. Under the Privacy Act of 1974, any statement or information provided by you may be used by the Commission to determine if further enforcement action is required. Any knowingly or willfully false statement, or concealment of any material fact, made in reply to this Citation is punishable by fine or imprisonment. Please also note that Section 1.17 of the Rules requires that you provide truthful and accurate statements to the Commission. VI. CONTACT INFORMATION 10. The closest FCC Office is the Denver Field Office in Denver, Colorado. You may contact this office by telephone, (303)231-5212, to schedule a personal interview, which must take place within twenty (20) days after the release date of this Citation. 11. Reasonable
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2010/DA-10-2194A1.html
  • with the Commission. 9. Under the Privacy Act of 1974, any statement or information provided by you may be used by the Commission to determine if further enforcement action is required. Any knowingly or willfully false statement, or concealment of any material fact, made in reply to this Citation is punishable by fine or imprisonment. Please also note that Section 1.17 of the Rules requires that you provide truthful and accurate statements to the Commission. VI. CONTACT INFORMATION 10. The closest FCC Office is the Denver Field Office in Denver, Colorado. You may contact this office by telephone, (303)231-5212, to schedule a personal interview, which must take place within twenty (20) days after the release date of this Citation. 11. Reasonable
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2010/DA-10-2195A1.html
  • with the Commission. 9. Under the Privacy Act of 1974, any statement or information provided by you may be used by the Commission to determine if further enforcement action is required. Any knowingly or willfully false statement, or concealment of any material fact, made in reply to this Citation is punishable by fine or imprisonment. Please also note that Section 1.17 of the Rules requires that you provide truthful and accurate statements to the Commission. VI. CONTACT INFORMATION 10. The closest FCC Office is the Denver Field Office in Denver, Colorado. You may contact this office by telephone, (303)231-5212, to schedule a personal interview, which must take place within twenty (20) days after the release date of this Citation. 11. Reasonable
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2010/DA-10-2220A1.html
  • with the Commission. 10. Under the Privacy Act of 1974, any statement or information provided by you may be used by the Commission to determine if further enforcement action is required. Any knowingly or willfully false statement, or concealment of any material fact, made in reply to this Citation is punishable by fine or imprisonment. Please also note that Section 1.17 of the Rules requires that you provide truthful and accurate statements to the Commission. V. CONTACT INFORMATION 11. The closest FCC Office is the Atlanta Office, in Duluth, Georgia. You may contact Neal McNeil by telephone, 202-418-1160, to schedule a personal interview, which must take place within thirty (30) days after the release date of this Citation. 12. Reasonable accommodations
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2010/DA-10-2240A1.html
  • with the Commission. 11. Under the Privacy Act of 1974, any statement or information provided by you may be used by the Commission to determine if further enforcement action is required. Any knowingly or willfully false statement, or concealment of any material fact, made in reply to this Citation is punishable by fine or imprisonment. Please also note that Section 1.17 of the Rules requires that you provide truthful and accurate statements to the Commission. V. CONTACT INFORMATION 12. The closest FCC Office is the Seattle Field Office in Kirkland, Washington. You may contact Salomon Satche by telephone, (301) 725-1996, to schedule a personal interview, which must take place within thirty (30) days after the release date of this Citation. You
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2010/DA-10-2295A1.html
  • with the Commission. 11. Under the Privacy Act of 1974, any statement or information provided by you may be used by the Commission to determine if further enforcement action is required. Any knowingly or willfully false statement, or concealment of any material fact, made in reply to this Citation is punishable by fine or imprisonment. Please also note that Section 1.17 of the Rules requires that you provide truthful and accurate statements to the Commission. V. CONTACT INFORMATION 12. The closest FCC Office is the Seattle Field Office in Kirkland, Washington. You may contact Salomon Satche by telephone, (301) 725-1996, to schedule a personal interview, which must take place within thirty (30) days after the release date of this Citation. You
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2010/DA-10-669A1.html
  • intentional radiator is defined by Section 15.3(o) of the Rules, 47 C.F.R. S: 15.3(o), as "[a] device that intentionally generates and emits radio frequency energy by radiation or induction." 47 C.F.R. S:S: 2.1031-2.1060. 47 C.F.R. S: 15.201(b). 47 C.F.R. S: 2.803(g). 47 U.S.C. S: 333. We note that although the Citation did not specifically address Phonejammer's behavior as a Section 1.17(a)(2) violation, 47 C.F.R. S: 1.17(a)(2), the Citation emphasized that evidence gathered from Phonejammer's website clearly contradicted Phonejammer's claim that it did not market its phone jammers to individuals in the United States. Moreover, the Citation noted that Phonejammer failed to attest to the truth and accuracy of the information in its response. We will issue a separate Citation to Phonejammer
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2010/DA-10-995A1.html
  • the Bureau is sending letters of inquiry to all licensees that air Fox Television Network programming. We take this step to advance the investigation. It should not be construed as a concession that our initial inquiry to Fox was misdirected. 47 U.S.C. S: 154(i). 47 U.S.C. S: 154(j). 47 U.S.C. S: 403. 47 C.F.R. S: 73.1015. See 47 C.F.R. S: 1.17. See, e.g., SBC Communications Order, 17 FCC Rcd at 7599-7600 P:P: 23-28 (ordering $100,000 forfeiture for egregious and intentional failure to certify the response to a Bureau inquiry); Digital Antenna, Inc., Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture and Order, 23 FCC Rcd 7600, 7602 (Spectrum Enforcement Div., Enf. Bur. 2008) (proposing $11,000 forfeiture for failure to provide a complete response
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2011/DA-11-1111A1.html
  • with the Commission. 7. Under the Privacy Act of 1974, any statement or information provided by you may be used by the Commission to determine if further enforcement action is required. Any knowingly or willfully false statement, or concealment of any material fact, made in reply to this Citation is punishable by fine or imprisonment. Please also note that section 1.17 of the Rules requires that you provide truthful and accurate statements to the Commission. V. CONTACT INFORMATION 8. The closest FCC Office is the New York Office in New York. You may contact Dan Noel by telephone, (212) 337-1865, to schedule a personal interview, which must take place within thirty (30) days after the release date of this Citation. You
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2011/DA-11-1164A1.html
  • the Commission. 13. Under the Privacy Act of 1974, any statement or information provided by New Generation may be used by the Commission to determine if further enforcement action is required. Any knowingly or willfully false statement, or concealment of any material fact, made in reply to this Citation is punishable by fine or imprisonment. Please also note that section 1.17 of the Rules requires that New Generation provide truthful and accurate statements to the Commission. V. CONTACT INFORMATION 14. The closest FCC Office is the Detroit Office in Farmington Hills, Michigan. Please contact Celia Lewis by telephone, 202-418-7456, if New Generation wishes to schedule a personal interview. The interview should take place within thirty (30) days after the release date
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2011/DA-11-1165A1.html
  • with the Commission. 13. Under the Privacy Act of 1974, we also inform Sound Around that the Commission's staff will use all relevant material information before it, including information disclosed in its interview or written statement, to determine if further enforcement action is required to ensure compliance with the Communications Act and the Commission's Rules. Please also note that section 1.17 of the Rules requires that Sound Around provide truthful and accurate statements to the Commission. In addition, the knowing and willful making of any false statement, or the concealment of any material fact, in reply to this Citation is punishable by fine or imprisonment. IV. contact information 14. The closest FCC office is the New York Field Office in New
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2011/DA-11-125A1.html
  • with the Commission. 12. Under the Privacy Act of 1974, any statement or information provided by you may be used by the Commission to determine if further enforcement action is required. Any knowingly or willfully false statement or concealment of any material fact, made in reply to this Citation is punishable by fine or imprisonment. Please also note that section 1.17 of the Rules requires that you provide truthful and accurate statements to the Commission. V. CONTACT INFORMATION 13. The closest FCC Office is the Los Angeles Field Office, in Cerritos, California. You may contact Samantha Peoples by telephone, 202-418-1101, to schedule a personal interview, which must take place within thirty (30) days after the release date of this Citation. You
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2011/DA-11-135A1.html
  • with the Commission. 12. Under the Privacy Act of 1974, any statement or information provided by you may be used by the Commission to determine if further enforcement action is required. Any knowingly or willfully false statement or concealment of any material fact, made in reply to this Citation is punishable by fine or imprisonment. Please also note that section 1.17 of the Rules requires that you provide truthful and accurate statements to the Commission. V. CONTACT INFORMATION 13. The closest FCC office is the New York District Office, in New York, NY. You may contact Jennifer Burton by telephone, 202-418-1160, to schedule a personal interview, which must take place within thirty (30) days after the release date of this Citation.
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2011/DA-11-1536A1.html
  • EB-11-IH-0734 VERMONT TELEPHONE COMPANY, INC. ) NAL/Acct. No.: 201232080004 Participant in Auction No. 86 ) FRN: 0005209374 ) NOTICE OF APPARENT LIABILITY FOR FORFEITURE Adopted: October 14, 2011 Released: October 14, 2011 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: I. INTRODUCTION 1. In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture ("NAL"), we find that Vermont Telephone Company, Inc. ("VTel"), apparently violated sections 1.17 and 1.65 of the Commission's rules ("Rules") by willfully and repeatedly failing to submit accurate revenue information to the Commission and by failing to maintain the continuing accuracy of its application in connection with its participation in Auction No. 86. Based on our review of the facts and circumstances surrounding this matter, and for the reasons discussed below, we find
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2011/DA-11-1661A1.html
  • Commission. 16. Under the Privacy Act of 1974, any statement or information provided by an Online Vendor may be used by the Commission to determine if further enforcement action is required. Any knowingly or willfully false statement or concealment of any material fact made in reply to this Citation is punishable by fine or imprisonment. Please also note that section 1.17 of the Rules requires that truthful and accurate statements be provided to the Commission. V. CONTACT INFORMATION 17. For purposes of scheduling a personal interview, the closest FCC office for each Online Vendor is included in Appendix A to this Citation. An Online Vendor may contact the Spectrum Enforcement Division by telephone, 202-418-1160, to schedule an interview, which must take
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2011/DA-11-1720A1.html
  • with the Commission. 12. Under the Privacy Act of 1974, any statement or information provided by you may be used by the Commission to determine if further enforcement action is required. Any knowingly or willfully false statement, or concealment of any material fact, made in reply to this Citation is punishable by fine or imprisonment. Please also note that section 1.17 of the Rules requires that you provide truthful and accurate statements to the Commission. VI. CONTACT INFORMATION 13. The closest FCC Office is the San Juan Office in San Juan, Puerto Rico. Spy Gallery may contact Reuben Jusino by telephone, 787-306-1193, to schedule a personal interview, which must take place within thirty (30) calendar days after the release date of
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2011/DA-11-1786A1.html
  • in the future. 9. Under the Privacy Act of 1974, any statement or information provided by you may be used by the Commission to determine if further enforcement action is required. Any knowingly or willfully false statement, or concealment of any material fact, made in reply to this Citation is punishable by fine or imprisonment. Please also note that Section 1.17 of the Rules requires that you provide truthful and accurate statements to the Commission. VI. CONTACT INFORMATION 10. The closest FCC Office is the Seattle Field Office in Kirkland, Washington. You may contact this office by telephone, (360)696-6707, to schedule a personal interview, which must take place within twenty (20) days after the release date of this Citation. All written
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2011/DA-11-1787A1.html
  • in the future. 9. Under the Privacy Act of 1974, any statement or information provided by you may be used by the Commission to determine if further enforcement action is required. Any knowingly or willfully false statement, or concealment of any material fact, made in reply to this Citation is punishable by fine or imprisonment. Please also note that Section 1.17 of the Rules requires that you provide truthful and accurate statements to the Commission. VI. CONTACT INFORMATION 10. The closest FCC Office is the Seattle Field Office in Kirkland, Washington. You may contact this office by telephone, (360)696-6707, to schedule a personal interview, which must take place within twenty (20) days after the release date of this Citation. All written
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2011/DA-11-184A1.html
  • Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau: I. INTRODUCTION 1. In this Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture ("NAL"), we find Cricket Communications, Inc. ("Cricket"), licensee of common carrier fixed point-to-point microwave stations, call signs WQJE535, Midway, Kentucky, and WQJF544, Frankfort, Kentucky, apparently liable for a forfeiture in the amount of twenty thousand dollars ($20,000) for willful violation of section 1.17(a)(2) of the Commission's rules ("Rules"). The noted violation involves Cricket's provision of incorrect material factual information to the Commission regarding the construction of station WQJE535 without a reasonable basis for believing that the information was correct and accurate. We also admonish Cricket for operating stations WQJE535 and WQJF544 for seven months prior to obtaining Commission authority in violation of section
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2011/DA-11-246A1.html
  • is assigned by the grantee or applicant. 47 U.S.C. S:S: 302a(b), 333. 47 C.F.R. S: 2.931. 47 U.S.C. S:S: 302a(b), 333; 47 C.F.R. S:S: 2.803, 2.907(b), 2.931, 2.932, 2.936, 2.946. We are simultaneously issuing a citation to Share Enterprises, the company that marketed the TxTStopper(TM) device in the United States, for violations of sections 302(b) of the Act and sections 1.17 and 2.803 of the Rules. See Share Enterprises Unlimited, Inc., Citation, DA 11-247, February 9, 2011. TxTStopper(TM) website, at http://www.txtstopper.com/cms (visited June 29, 2010 and October 18, 2010); see also TxTStopper on CNN at http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=io8AtlGRjpQ. See id. at http://www.txtstopper.com/cms/content/faqs (visited June 29, 2010 and October 18, 2010). See id. at http://www.txtstopper.com/cms/ (Testimonials from Tina S., Atlanta, GA ("With TxTStopper(TM) I
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2011/DA-11-247A1.html
  • 1934, as amended ("Communications Act"), to Share Enterprises Unlimited, Inc. ("Share") for marketing unauthorized radio frequency devices in the United States in violation of section 302(b) of the Communications Act, and section 2.803 of the Commission's rules ("Rules"), and for providing incorrect, material factual information to the Spectrum Enforcement Division ("Division") of the Enforcement Bureau ("Bureau") in violation of section 1.17(a)(2) of the Rules. 2. Share should take immediate steps to come into compliance and to avoid any recurrence of this misconduct. As explained below and as provided in the Communications Act, future violations of the Rules in this regard may subject your company to substantial monetary penalties, seizure of equipment, and criminal sanctions. We also direct Share to supplement its
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2011/DA-11-248A1.html
  • with the Commission. 15. Under the Privacy Act of 1974, any statement or information provided by you may be used by the Commission to determine if further enforcement action is required. Any knowingly or willfully false statement or concealment of any material fact, made in reply to this Citation is punishable by fine or imprisonment. Please also note that section 1.17 of the Rules requires that you provide truthful and accurate statements to the Commission. V. Contact Information 16. The closest FCC Office is the Seattle District Office, in Kirkland, Washington. Please call Katherine Power at 202-418-0919 if you wish to schedule a personal interview, which must take place within thirty (30) days after the release of this Citation. You should
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2011/DA-11-408A1.html
  • with the Commission. 10. Under the Privacy Act of 1974, any statement or information provided by you may be used by the Commission to determine if further enforcement action is required. Any knowingly or willfully false statement, or concealment of any material fact, made in reply to this Citation is punishable by fine or imprisonment. Please also note that section 1.17 of the rules requires that you provide truthful and accurate statements to the Commission. V. CONTACT INFORMATION 11. The closest FCC Office is the Los Angeles Office in Cerritos, California. You may contact the Los Angeles Office by telephone, (562) 860-7474, to schedule a personal interview, which must take place within thirty (30) days after the release date of this
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2011/DA-11-47A1.html
  • in the future. 9. Under the Privacy Act of 1974, any statement or information provided by you may be used by the Commission to determine if further enforcement action is required. Any knowingly or willfully false statement, or concealment of any material fact, made in reply to this Citation is punishable by fine or imprisonment. Please also note that Section 1.17 of the Rules requires that you provide truthful and accurate statements to the Commission. VI. CONTACT INFORMATION 10. The closest FCC Office is the Seattle Field Office in Kirkland, Washington. You may contact this office by telephone, (360)696-6707, to schedule a personal interview, which must take place within twenty (20) days after the release date of this Citation. All written
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2011/DA-11-550A1.html
  • with the Commission. 9. Under the Privacy Act of 1974, any statement or information provided by you may be used by the Commission to determine if further enforcement action is required. Any knowingly or willfully false statement, or concealment of any material fact, made in reply to this Citation is punishable by fine or imprisonment. Please also note that section 1.17 of the Rules requires that you provide truthful and accurate statements to the Commission. VI. CONTACT INFORMATION 10. The closest FCC Office is the Atlanta Field Office in Duluth, GA. You may contact this office by telephone, (770)935-3370, to schedule a personal interview, which must take place within twenty (20) days after the release date of this Citation. 11. Reasonable
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2011/DA-11-5A1.html
  • with the Commission. 10. Under the Privacy Act of 1974, any statement or information provided by you may be used by the Commission to determine if further enforcement action is required. Any knowingly or willfully false statement, or concealment of any material fact, made in reply to this Citation is punishable by fine or imprisonment. Please also note that Section 1.17 of the Rules requires that you provide truthful and accurate statements to the Commission. V. CONTACT INFORMATION 11. The closest FCC Office is the Detroit Office in Farmington Hills, Michigan. You may contact James Bridgewater by telephone, (248) 471-5661, to schedule a personal interview, which must take place within thirty (30) days after the release date of this Citation. You
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2011/DA-11-704A1.html
  • with the Commission. 9. Under the Privacy Act of 1974, any statement or information provided by you may be used by the Commission to determine if further enforcement action is required. Any knowingly or willfully false statement, or concealment of any material fact, made in reply to this Citation is punishable by fine or imprisonment. Please also note that section 1.17 of the Rules requires that you provide truthful and accurate statements to the Commission. V. CONTACT INFORMATION 10. The closest FCC Office is the Philadelphia Office in Langhorne, Pennsylvania. You may contact Gene Stanbro by telephone, (215) 741-3016, to schedule a personal interview, which must take place within thirty (30) days after the release date of this Citation. You should
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2011/DA-11-812A1.html
  • with the Commission. 12. Under the Privacy Act of 1974, any statement or information provided by you may be used by the Commission to determine if further enforcement action is required. Any knowingly or willfully false statement, or concealment of any material fact, made in reply to this Citation is punishable by fine or imprisonment. Please also note that section 1.17 of the Rules requires that you provide truthful and accurate statements to the Commission. V. CONTACT INFORMATION 13. The closest FCC office is the New York District Office in New York, NY. You may contact Karen Mercer by telephone, (202) 418-1160, to schedule a personal interview, which must take place within thirty (30) calendar days after the release date of
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2011/DA-11-924A1.html
  • with the Commission. 12. Under the Privacy Act of 1974, any statement or information provided by you may be used by the Commission to determine if further enforcement action is required. Any knowingly or willfully false statement, or concealment of any material fact, made in reply to this Citation is punishable by fine or imprisonment. Please also note that section 1.17 of the Rules requires that you provide truthful and accurate statements to the Commission. VI. CONTACT INFORMATION 13. The closest FCC Office is the Atlanta District Office in Atlanta, Georgia. Pyong Kon Eun may contact Salomon Satche by telephone, 301-725-1996, to schedule a personal interview, which must take place within Thirty (30) calendar days after the release date of this
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2011/DA-11-984A1.html
  • with the Commission. 11. Under the Privacy Act of 1974, any statement or information provided by you may be used by the Commission to determine if further enforcement action is required. Any knowingly or willfully false statement, or concealment of any material fact, made in reply to this Citation is punishable by fine or imprisonment. Please also note that section 1.17 of the Rules requires that you provide truthful and accurate statements to the Commission. V. CONTACT INFORMATION 12. The closest FCC office is the Chicago District Office in Park Ridge, Illinois. You may contact James M. Roop by telephone, 847-813-4660, to schedule a personal interview, which must take place within thirty (30) days after the release date of this Citation.
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2011/DA-11-98A1.html
  • with the Commission. 11. Under the Privacy Act of 1974, any statement or information provided by you may be used by the Commission to determine if further enforcement action is required. Any knowingly or willfully false statement, or concealment of any material fact, made in reply to this Citation is punishable by fine or imprisonment. Please also note that Section 1.17 of the Rules requires that you provide truthful and accurate statements to the Commission. IV. CONTACT INFORMATION 12. The closest FCC Office is the Seattle Field Office in Kirkland, Washington. You may contact Salomon Satche by telephone, (301) 725-1996, to schedule a personal interview, which must take place within thirty (30) days after the release date of this Citation. You
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2011/DOC-313017A1.html
  • III(B) - page 10) TIME OF DAY VIOLATION (See Attachment A, section IV - page 11) CALLER IDENTIFICATION VIOLATION (See Attachment A, section V - page 12) If, after receipt of this citation, you or your company again violates section 227 of the Act or sections 64.1200, 64.1601(e), or 68.318 of the Commission's rules in any manner or violates section 1.17 of our rules (discussed below) when responding to this citation, the Commission may impose monetary forfeitures not to exceed $16,000 for each such violation or each day of a continuing violation. RESPONDING TO THE CITATION You may respond to this citation within 30 days from the date of this letter either through (1) a written statement, (2) a teleconference interview
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2011/DOC-313019A1.html
  • III(B) - page 10) TIME OF DAY VIOLATION (See Attachment A, section IV - page 11) CALLER IDENTIFICATION VIOLATION (See Attachment A, section V - page 12) If, after receipt of this citation, you or your company again violates section 227 of the Act or sections 64.1200, 64.1601(e), or 68.318 of the Commission's rules in any manner or violates section 1.17 of our rules (discussed below) when responding to this citation, the Commission may impose monetary forfeitures not to exceed $16,000 for each such violation or each day of a continuing violation. RESPONDING TO THE CITATION You may respond to this citation within 30 days from the date of this letter either through (1) a written statement, (2) a teleconference interview
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2011/DOC-313020A1.html
  • III(B) - page 10) TIME OF DAY VIOLATION (See Attachment A, section IV - page 11) CALLER IDENTIFICATION VIOLATION (See Attachment A, section V - page 12) If, after receipt of this citation, you or your company again violates section 227 of the Act or sections 64.1200, 64.1601(e), or 68.318 of the Commission's rules in any manner or violates section 1.17 of our rules (discussed below) when responding to this citation, the Commission may impose monetary forfeitures not to exceed $16,000 for each such violation or each day of a continuing violation. RESPONDING TO THE CITATION You may respond to this citation within 30 days from the date of this letter either through (1) a written statement, (2) a teleconference interview
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2011/DOC-313021A1.html
  • III(B) - page 10) TIME OF DAY VIOLATION (See Attachment A, section IV - page 11) CALLER IDENTIFICATION VIOLATION (See Attachment A, section V - page 12) If, after receipt of this citation, you or your company again violates section 227 of the Act or sections 64.1200, 64.1601(e), or 68.318 of the Commission's rules in any manner or violates section 1.17 of our rules (discussed below) when responding to this citation, the Commission may impose monetary forfeitures not to exceed $16,000 for each such violation or each day of a continuing violation. RESPONDING TO THE CITATION You may respond to this citation within 30 days from the date of this letter either through (1) a written statement, (2) a teleconference interview
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2011/DOC-313022A1.html
  • III(B) - page 10) TIME OF DAY VIOLATION (See Attachment A, section IV - page 11) CALLER IDENTIFICATION VIOLATION (See Attachment A, section V - page 12) If, after receipt of this citation, you or your company again violates section 227 of the Act or sections 64.1200, 64.1601(e), or 68.318 of the Commission's rules in any manner or violates section 1.17 of our rules (discussed below) when responding to this citation, the Commission may impose monetary forfeitures not to exceed $16,000 for each such violation or each day of a continuing violation. RESPONDING TO THE CITATION You may respond to this citation within 30 days from the date of this letter either through (1) a written statement, (2) a teleconference interview
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2011/DOC-313023A1.html
  • III(B) - page 10) TIME OF DAY VIOLATION (See Attachment A, section IV - page 11) CALLER IDENTIFICATION VIOLATION (See Attachment A, section V - page 12) If, after receipt of this citation, you or your company again violates section 227 of the Act or sections 64.1200, 64.1601(e), or 68.318 of the Commission's rules in any manner or violates section 1.17 of our rules (discussed below) when responding to this citation, the Commission may impose monetary forfeitures not to exceed $16,000 for each such violation or each day of a continuing violation. RESPONDING TO THE CITATION You may respond to this citation within 30 days from the date of this letter either through (1) a written statement, (2) a teleconference interview
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2011/DOC-313024A1.html
  • III(B) - page 10) TIME OF DAY VIOLATION (See Attachment A, section IV - page 11) CALLER IDENTIFICATION VIOLATION (See Attachment A, section V - page 12) If, after receipt of this citation, you or your company again violates section 227 of the Act or sections 64.1200, 64.1601(e), or 68.318 of the Commission's rules in any manner or violates section 1.17 of our rules (discussed below) when responding to this citation, the Commission may impose monetary forfeitures not to exceed $16,000 for each such violation or each day of a continuing violation. RESPONDING TO THE CITATION You may respond to this citation within 30 days from the date of this letter either through (1) a written statement, (2) a teleconference interview
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2011/DOC-313025A1.html
  • III(B) - page 10) TIME OF DAY VIOLATION (See Attachment A, section IV - page 11) CALLER IDENTIFICATION VIOLATION (See Attachment A, section V - page 12) If, after receipt of this citation, you or your company again violates section 227 of the Act or sections 64.1200, 64.1601(e), or 68.318 of the Commission's rules in any manner or violates section 1.17 of our rules (discussed below) when responding to this citation, the Commission may impose monetary forfeitures not to exceed $16,000 for each such violation or each day of a continuing violation. RESPONDING TO THE CITATION You may respond to this citation within 30 days from the date of this letter either through (1) a written statement, (2) a teleconference interview
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2011/DOC-313028A1.html
  • III(B) - page 10) TIME OF DAY VIOLATION (See Attachment A, section IV - page 11) CALLER IDENTIFICATION VIOLATION (See Attachment A, section V - page 12) If, after receipt of this citation, you or your company again violates section 227 of the Act or sections 64.1200, 64.1601(e), or 68.318 of the Commission's rules in any manner or violates section 1.17 of our rules (discussed below) when responding to this citation, the Commission may impose monetary forfeitures not to exceed $16,000 for each such violation or each day of a continuing violation. RESPONDING TO THE CITATION You may respond to this citation within 30 days from the date of this letter either through (1) a written statement, (2) a teleconference interview
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2012/DA-12-64A1.html
  • Media Designer, Clear Channel Los Angeles. See LOI Response at Exhibit K and Further LOI Response at Exhibit 2. See LOI Response at 4 and Application of WorldCom, Inc. and MCI Communications Corporation for Transfer of Control of MCI Communications Corporation to Worldcom, Inc., Memorandum Opinion and Order, 13 FCC Rcd 18025, 18134 P: 193 (1998) (citing 47 C.F.R. S: 1.17 for proposition that, in light of their duty to be truthful and accurate in their representations to the Commission, statements provided by Commission licensees in response to investigatory or adjudicatory matters within the Commission's jurisdiction are awarded substantial weight in the absence of persuasive evidence to the contrary). See The Commission's Forfeiture Policy Statement and Amendment of Section 1.80 of
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2012/DA-12-679A1.html
  • with the Commission. 9. Under the Privacy Act of 1974, any statement or information provided by you may be used by the Commission to determine if further enforcement action is required. Any knowingly or willfully false statement, or concealment of any material fact, made in reply to this Citation is punishable by fine or imprisonment. Please also note that Section 1.17 of the Rules requires that you provide truthful and accurate statements to the Commission. V. CONTACT INFORMATION 10. The closest FCC Office is the Atlanta Office in Atlanta, Georgia. North Chapel may contact Douglas Miller by telephone, (770) 935-3370, to schedule a personal interview, which must take place within thirty (30) calendar days after the release date of this Citation.
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2012/DA-12-931A1.html
  • 14, 2012 By the Resident Agent, Houston Office, South Central Region, Enforcement Bureau: I. INTRODUCTION 1. In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (NAL), we find Vision Latina Broadcasting, Inc. (Vision Latina Broadcasting), licensee of Station KBPO, Port Neches, Texas, apparently liable for a forfeiture in the amount of twenty five thousand dollars ($25,000) for willful violation of Section 1.17(a)(2) of the Commission's rules (Rules). The noted violation involves Vision Latina Broadcasting's provision of incorrect factual information of a material nature to the Commission regarding Station KBPO's public inspection file without a reasonable basis for believing that the information was correct and accurate. II. BACKGROUND 2. On December 9, 2010, during regular business hours, an agent from the Enforcement Bureau's
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2012/DOC-313029A1.html
  • III(B) - page 10) TIME OF DAY VIOLATION (See Attachment A, section IV - page 11) CALLER IDENTIFICATION VIOLATION (See Attachment A, section V - page 12) If, after receipt of this citation, you or your company again violates section 227 of the Act or sections 64.1200, 64.1601(e), or 68.318 of the Commission's rules in any manner or violates section 1.17 of our rules (discussed below) when responding to this citation, the Commission may impose monetary forfeitures not to exceed $16,000 for each such violation or each day of a continuing violation. RESPONDING TO THE CITATION You may respond to this citation within 30 days from the date of this letter either through (1) a written statement, (2) a teleconference interview
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2012/DOC-313030A1.html
  • III(B) - page 10) TIME OF DAY VIOLATION (See Attachment A, section IV - page 11) CALLER IDENTIFICATION VIOLATION (See Attachment A, section V - page 12) If, after receipt of this citation, you or your company again violates section 227 of the Act or sections 64.1200, 64.1601(e), or 68.318 of the Commission's rules in any manner or violates section 1.17 of our rules (discussed below) when responding to this citation, the Commission may impose monetary forfeitures not to exceed $16,000 for each such violation or each day of a continuing violation. RESPONDING TO THE CITATION You may respond to this citation within 30 days from the date of this letter either through (1) a written statement, (2) a teleconference interview
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Public_Notices/DA-10-91A1.html
  • include number of complaints, broken down by category or complaint, e.g., instances of improper access by employees, instances of improper disclosure to individuals not authorized to receive the information, or instances of improper access to online information by individuals not authorized to view the information.] The company represents and warrants that the above certification is consistent with 47. C.F.R. S: 1.17 which requires truthful and accurate statements to the Commission. The company also acknowledges that false statements and misrepresentations to the Commission are punishable under Title 18 of the U.S. Code and may subject it to enforcement action. Signed _____________________________ [Signature of an officer, as agent of the carrier] Attachments: Accompanying Statement explaining CPNI procedures Explanation of actions taken against data
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Public_Notices/DA-11-159A1.html
  • the number of complaints, broken down by category or complaint, e.g., instances of improper access by employees, instances of improper disclosure to individuals not authorized to receive the information, or instances of improper access to online information by individuals not authorized to view the information.] The company represents and warrants that the above certification is consistent with 47. C.F.R. S: 1.17 which requires truthful and accurate statements to the Commission. The company also acknowledges that false statements and misrepresentations to the Commission are punishable under Title 18 of the U.S. Code and may subject it to enforcement action. Signed _____________________________ [Signature of an officer, as agent of the carrier] Attachments: Accompanying Statement explaining CPNI procedures Explanation of actions taken against data
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Public_Notices/DA-11-500A1.html
  • Ownership in the Broadcasting Services, Report and Order and Third Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, 23 FCC Rcd 5922, 5940 P: 40 (2008). See id. at 5941 P: 49. See id. See FCC Form 303-S (eff. March 2011) (a copy of which is available from the FCC's website), available at http://www.fcc.gov/Forms/Form303-S/303s.pdf. See 47 U.S.C. S: 309(k). See 47 C.F.R. S: 1.17. See 47 C.F.R. S: 1.65 (applicants have a continuing obligation to advise the FCC, through amendments, of any substantial and material changes in the information furnished in this application). Page 2 of 2 PUBLIC NOTICE Page 1of 2 PUBLIC NOTICE FCC ENFORCEMENT ADVISORY Federal Communications Commission 445 12th St., S.W. Washington, D.C. 20554 News Media Information 202 / 418-0500 Internet:
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Public_Notices/DA-12-170A1.html
  • the number of complaints, broken down by category or complaint, e.g., instances of improper access by employees, instances of improper disclosure to individuals not authorized to receive the information, or instances of improper access to online information by individuals not authorized to view the information.] The company represents and warrants that the above certification is consistent with 47. C.F.R. S: 1.17 which requires truthful and accurate statements to the Commission. The company also acknowledges that false statements and misrepresentations to the Commission are punishable under Title 18 of the U.S. Code and may subject it to enforcement action. Signed _____________________________ [Signature of an officer, as agent of the carrier] Attachments: Accompanying Statement explaining CPNI procedures Explanation of actions taken against data
• http://transition.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/FCC-99-55A1.doc http://transition.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/FCC-99-55A1.pdf
  • we wish to correct Reynolds' erroneous assumption in its comments that applicants would be prohibited from filing curative amendments. Our current commercial and NCE FM amendment procedures will apply to contingent applications. The one processing policy change is that the staff will dismiss all related applications if one application remains unacceptable after the opportunity for filing curative amendments has closed. 1.17 We find unpersuasive Self's Section 307(b) arguments against this proposal. The Commission has faced similar policy concerns previously. Then, as now, we recognized the potential benefits of permitting the filing of competing proposals and that a processing rule which limits the opportunity to file mutually exclusive applications is prima facie inconsistent with this statutory mandate. Nevertheless, we concluded that the
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/02/releases/fc990211.doc http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/02/releases/fc990211.pdf http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/02/releases/fc990211.txt
  • payment on its successful bids no later than August 8, 1994. CRSPI failed to do so, and therefore, was in default. After the conclusion of the IVDS auction, it came to the Commission's attention that CRSPI may have violated the Commission's rules, including Sections 1.2105(a)(2)(viii), 1.2105(a)(2)(ix), 1.2105(c)(prohibition of collusion); Sections 1.2110(b) and 95.816(d) (claiming a false bidding credit); and Section 1.17 (written submission of false financial information). In addition, CRSPI may have abused Commission processes. Consequently, the Commission ordered an investigation into CRSPI's conduct in the IVDS auction. As a result of this investigation, the Commission, inter alia, released an Order to Show Cause on February 16, 1995 ("OSC") to inquire into CRSPI's auction-related activities. 3. In the OSC, the Commission
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/23/charts/23press2.pdf
  • 26 28 27 $58,697,000.00 $41,353,000.00 47 1.41 1 13.20 27 15 15 $59,604,000.00 $41,253,050.00 45 1.40 1 7.44 28 8 8 $59,982,000.00 $41,588,550.00 45 1.39 1 3.44 29 19 19 $60,146,000.00 $40,974,100.00 43 1.35 1 14.11 30 17 17 $60,624,000.00 $42,081,250.00 43 1.23 2 7.10 31 18 18 $61,782,000.00 $42,504,850.00 41 1.19 2 8.40 32 13 13 $62,489,000.00 $43,727,700.00 41 1.17 2 5.41 33 9 9 $62,960,000.00 $43,719,000.00 40 1.16 2 5.04 34 7 7 $63,386,000.00 $44,065,500.00 40 1.15 2 4.08 35 13 12 $63,847,000.00 $44,296,100.00 40 1.08 3 5.04 36 6 6 $64,203,000.00 $44,491,900.00 40 1.06 3 2.72 37 3 3 $64,447,000.00 $44,626,100.00 40 1.04 3 1.44 38 4 4 $64,782,000.00 $44,810,350.00 40 1.04 3 1.66 39 1 1 $64,801,000.00
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/conferences/combin2000/releases/98540193.pdf
  • no statistically significant relationships, but we may simply observe from the tables above that: Result 10: Bankruptcy never occurred in the additive environment and had the highest aggregate frequency in the high synergy environment. 32 Table 4.7b: ANOVA-Bankruptcies per Bidder: Superadditive Environment Variable F-statistic p-value Flexible 1.1547 0.28 Unequal 1.25 0.26 Environment (H,M,L) 1.43 0.24 CE exists 0.05 0.813 Overlap 1.17 0.32 4.8 Withdrawals and Combined Withdrawal and Bidding One bidding option available to bidders in the SMR auctions is the ability to withdraw a standing bid. This withdrawal does not come without a cost. The tables below show the average number of withdrawals per auction. Across all treatments and environments the average number of withdrawals was less than 1. Table
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/default.htm?job=conference_agenda&y=2001
  • Levin, Daniel Vincent 12:00 - 1:30 Lunch - Keynote speech David Sappington, Chief Economist FCC 1:30 - 2:00 FCC 700 MHz Auction Design and Software Craig Bomberger, FCC [50]Package Bidding System Screenshots (pdf) (1.92 MB) 2:00 - 3:00 Issues in Scaling Up the 700 MHz Auction Design Karla Hoffman, FCC [51]Issues in Scaling Up the 700 MHz Auction Design (pdf) (1.17 MB) 3:00 - 3:30 Discussion Discussant(s): Craig Bomberger, Karla Hoffman, Evan Kwerel, Walter Strack, Karen Wrege 3:30 - 4:00 Break 4:00 - 5:00 Market Clearing Technology for Markets with Expressive Bidding Tuomas Sandholm Discussant(s): Martin Durbin, Kevin Leyton-Brown 6:00 - 7:00 Reception 7:00 - 9:00 Dinner Sunday October 28 Time Event 7:30 - 8:30 Breakfast 8:30 - 10:00 Balanced Budget
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/default.htm?job=conference_presentations&y=2001
  • Combinatorial Bidding Conference Presentations 10/27/2001 Ascending Auctions with Package Bidding Lawrence Ausubel and Paul Milgrom [48]pdf (140 KB) - Presentation Slides ([49]pdf) (155 KB) Tradeoffs in Combinatorial Auction Design Aleksandar Pekec and Michael Rothkopf [50]pdf (130 KB) Package Bidding System Screenshots Craig Bomberger, FCC [51]pdf (1.92 MB) Issues in Scaling Up the 700 MHz Auction Design Karla Hoffman, FCC [52]pdf (1.17 MB) 10/28/2001 Balanced Budget Mechanism Design for Combinatorial Exchanges David Parkes, Jayant Kalagnanam and Marta Eso Balanced Budget Mechanism Design for Combinatorial Exchanges ([53]pdf) (217 KB) - Complete Paper ([54]pdf) (425 KB) [55]Return to Top Arrow Return To Top Last reviewed/updated on 7/23/2004 [56]FCC Home [57]Search [58]RSS [59]Updates [60]E-Filing [61]Initiatives [62]Consumers [63]Find People General Auctions Information [64]Licensing, Technical Support and
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/rss/index.htm?job=ainf&id=66
  • Winning Bidders http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/default.htm?job=auction_summary&id=66T ue, 22 Aug 2006 21:20:01 GMT Summary Licenses: Auction No. 66 will offer 1,122 licenses: 36 Regional Economic Area Grouping (REAG) licenses, 352 Economic Area (EA) licenses, and 734 Cellular Market Area (CMA) licenses. Qualified Bidders: 168 Rounds Completed: 29 Bidding Days: 9 Results for Round 29 Gross Revenue: $11,695,083,900.00 - Dollar Change: 135135000.00 - % Change: 1.17 Net Revenue: $11,504,367,500.00 - Dollar Change: 136608000.00 - % Change: 1.20 New Bids: 290 Withdrawn Bids: 0 Proactive Waivers: 0 Bidders that Reduced Eligibility: 14 Licenses with PWBs*: 882 FCC Held Licenses: 240 Eligible Bidders: 137 (of 168 qualified bidders) * PWBs = Provisionally Winning Bidders http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/default.htm?job=auction_summary&id=66M on, 21 Aug 2006 14:35:01 GMT Summary Licenses: Auction No. 66 will offer
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/rss/index.htm?job=ainf&id=79
  • 53 (of 77 qualified bidders) * PWBs = Provisionally Winning Bidders http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/default.htm?job=auction_summary&id=79M on, 14 Sep 2009 21:05:02 GMT Summary Permits: 122 construction permits for FM Broadcast Qualified Bidders: 77 Rounds Completed: 36 Bidding Days: 8 Results for Round 36 Gross Revenue: $6,065,800.00 - Dollar Change: $42,000.00 - % Change: 0.70 Net Revenue: $5,112,300.00 - Dollar Change: $59,250.00 - % Change: 1.17 New Bids: 6 Withdrawn Bids: 0 Proactive Waivers: 2 Bidders that Reduced Eligibility: 1 Permits with PWBs*: 85 FCC Held Permits: 37 Eligible Bidders: 54 (of 77 qualified bidders) * PWBs = Provisionally Winning Bidders http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/default.htm?job=auction_summary&id=79S at, 12 Sep 2009 12:00:11 GMT Summary Permits: 122 construction permits for FM Broadcast Qualified Bidders: 77 Rounds Completed: 31 Bidding Days: 8 Results
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Cable/Orders/1999/fcc99024.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Cable/Orders/1999/fcc99024.txt http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Cable/Orders/1999/fcc99024.wp
  • the Commission that it intends to provide residential local exchange service in the foreseeable Ä Hearing at 183, ll. 2(c)5 (AT&T ÔSr. Vice President for Government Affairs and Federal Policy stating: "Simply put, this merger represents AT&T's Ä Hearing at 17 Ô(AT&T's Chairman stating: "This merger means most importantly local phone competition for residential customers"); AT&T(c)TCI Reply at 11(c)13. À 1.17. Although AT&T has acknowledged in a recent proxy statement that there is a "risk" that Ôit will not deploy local telephone service, the company did state affirmatively its intention to deploy local telephone Ôservice. Merger Proxy Statement at 21. In light of information directly supplied to the Commission by AT&T, Ôas well as the level of investment the company is
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Notices/1999/fcc99120.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Notices/1999/fcc99120.txt http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Notices/1999/fcc99120.wp
  • defaults include a multiplier to estimate the additional cost of the filling compound used in buried cable to protect the cable from moisture.148 For underground Federal Communications Commission FCC 99-120 149 HAI Inputs Portfolio at 24. 150 See supra note 128. 151 An earlier version of HCPM calculated 24-gauge copper cable by multiplying the values for 26-gauge copper cable by 1.17. See HCPM Dec. 15, 1998 model description at 19. 152 Letter from Chris Frentrup, MCI Worldcom, to Magalie Roman Salas, FCC, dated Feb. 9, 1999 (MCI Feb. 9, 1999 ex parte). 31 cable, HAI adds a per foot material cost for the conduit material.149 68. We tentatively conclude that we should adopt separate input values for the cost of aerial,
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1998/fcc98225.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1998/fcc98225.txt http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1998/fcc98225.wp
  • claim as speculative. Applicants maintain instead that these savings will occur because MCI will have use of WorldCom's existing local facilities and will avoid duplicative capital and operating expenditures. As a result, according to WorldCom and MCI, planned expansion into residential Federal Communications Commission FCC 98-225 540 WorldCom/MCI Jan. 26 Reply Comments at 11, 20-21. 541 See 47 C.F.R. § 1.17. 542 Bell Atlantic/NYNEX Order, 12 FCC Rcd at 20063, para. 157. 543 WorldCom/MCI Jan. 26 Reply Comments at 6-7. 544 Id. at 6. See Letter from Jean L. Kiddoo, Counsel to WorldCom, Swidler & Berlin, to Magalie Roman Salas, Secretary, FCC, Attach. "Presentation on Local Services" at 2, 3, 10, 11 (filed July 1, 1998) (WorldCom July 1 Ex Parte)
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/fcc00091.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/fcc00091.txt
  • may raise section 271 issues, including but not limited to the Applicants' post-divestiture use of in-region Internet backbone. See, e.g., MCI Worldcom Comments at 3, 6-7; Allegiance Reply Comments at 5. We expect the Applicants to be both truthful and forthcoming in responding to any Commission request for information deemed necessary to review the divestiture plan. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.17 requiring truthful written statements and responses to Commission inquiries and correspondence (``No applicant, permittee or licensee shall in any response to Commission correspondence or inquiry or in any application, pleading, report or any other written statement submitted to the Commission, make any misrepresentation or willful material omission bearing on any matter within the jurisdiction of the Commission.''). If we find
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da010852.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da010852.txt
  • instructions clearly state that the person signing the form is subject to sections 502 and 503(b) of Title 47 of the United States Code, which provide penalties for willful violations of the Commission's rules. Form 471; Instructions for Completing the Schools and Libraries Universal Service Services Ordered and Certification Form (FCC Form 471) (December 1998). See also 47 C.F.R. § 1.17 (requiring truthfulness in statements and documents filed before the Commission). See Schwarts Letter. USAC Letter at 2. BTCS Form 471. FCC Form 471 at Item 22. See BTCS Form 471; Form 470 from Bethlehem Temple Christian School to Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company. (continued....) Federal Communications Commission DA 01-852 Federal Communications Commission DA 01-852 Ä Å �
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/fcc01029.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/fcc01029.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/fcc01029.txt
  • 271-No. 43a-b and 271-No. 45a-b. See SWBT Aggregated Performance Data, Measurement No. 29-04, Kansas and Oklahoma, (``Percent SWBT Caused Missed Due Dates-No Field Work-Business-POTS - Resale''), at 271-No. 29-a. In Oklahoma, the disparity was 0.01 percent in July, 0.65 percent in August, 0.43 percent in September and 1.20 percent in October. In Kansas, the disparity was 0.09 percent in July, 1.17 percent in August, 0.78 percent in September and 3.32 percent in October. See SWBT Aggregated Performance Data, Measurement Nos. 27-01 to 27-04, 29-01 to 29-04, 43-01 to 43-08, and 45-01 to 45-08, Texas, at 271-No. 27a, 271-No. 29-a, 271-No. 43a-b and 271-No. 45a-b. SWBT's only disparities were in Measurement No. 29-02 (disparity of 0.80 percent in August and 0.42 percent
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2002/fcc02331.pdf
  • 7.00 13.72 5.50 0.52 1.00 7.00 0.83 1,2,4 A.2.1.3.1.1Design (Specials)/<10 circuits/Dispatch/FL (days) 21.96 10.11 23.01 6.62 23.84 12.49 26.81 10.74 23.69 2.50 1 A.2.1.3.1.2Design (Specials)/<10 circuits/Non- Dispatch/FL (days) 10.98 4.13 8.45 4.50 8.97 3.58 7.29 4.56 8.04 2.61 1,2,4 A.2.1.4.1.1PBX/<10 circuits/Dispatch/FL (days) 12.69 4.67 12.49 6.00 12.94 12.73 0.67 8.10 0.33 1,2,4,5 A.2.1.4.1.2PBX/<10 circuits/Non-Dispatch/FL (days) 5.49 4.79 6.50 2.87 4.52 1.17 1.90 1.05 3.30 1.17 2,4,5 A.2.1.4.2.1PBX/>=10 circuits/Dispatch/FL (days) 70.50 68.60 4.00 12.42 15.93 A.2.1.4.2.2PBX/>=10 circuits/Non-Dispatch/FL (days) 3.51 5.50 8.97 1.28 9.00 5.89 4.50 6.68 1.56 1,3,4,5 A.2.1.5.1.1Centrex/<10 circuits/Dispatch/FL (days) 6.56 1.00 7.24 8.15 6.51 6.03 1 A.2.1.5.1.2Centrex/<10 circuits/Non- Dispatch/FL (days) 1.43 3.04 2.18 1.55 4.18 0.89 5.83 2.00 3.72 5.00 1,3,4,5 A.2.1.5.2.1Centrex/>=10 circuits/Dispatch/FL (days) 9.70 14.78 13.32 11.32 10.54 A.2.1.5.2.2Centrex/>=10
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/Tariffs/Dominant/d102297.pdf
  • Y S.P. # S Y N O P S I S 97-317 PUBLIC REFERENCE LOG: 10/22/97 Proposes to enhance its Exchange Access Frame Relay Service (XA-FRS) with new higher speed connections; clarifies the Exchange Access Switched Multi-megabit Data Service (XASMDS) tariff material to show that the Subscriber Network Interface (SNI) associated with a 1.5 Mbps facility will accommodate either a 1.17 or a 1.54 Mbps rate, and includes other corrections. ENG 20 15 10/21/97BELL ATLANTIC 1007 1 PETN-DUE PUS PGS NTC #CDs #DISK TRANS# CARRIER ISSUED FCC# --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- EFFDATE 11/5/97 FILING# 1 61.3861.49 Y S.P. # S Y N O P S I S 10/28/97 Proposes to modify rates for certain services provided under Service Provision Option 1. SCF 3 14
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref02.pdf
  • 1.14 Average Local Rates for a Business with a Key-System Line in Urban Areas (As of October 15), 1989-2001...........25 Table 1.15 Monthly Telephone Rates in the Sample Cities for a Business with a Key-System Line (As of October 15), 1990-2001...........................................26 Table 1.16 Connection Charges for Three Key-System Business Lines in the Sample Cities (As of October 15), 1990-2001...........................................28 iii Table 1.17 Average Local Rates for Businesses with a PBX Trunk in Urban Areas (As of October 15, 2001)..........30 Table 1.18 Average Local Rates for a Business with a PBX Trunk in Urban Areas (As of October 15), 1989-2001.........31 Table 1.19 Monthly Telephone Rates in the Sample Cities for a Business with a PBX Trunk (As of October 15), 1990-2001...........................................32 Table 1.20
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref03.pdf
  • Average Local Rates for a Business with a Key-System Line in Urban Areas (As of October 15), 1989-2002 Table 1.15 Monthly Telephone Rates in the Sample Cities for a Business with a Key- System Line (As of October 15), 1990-2002 ii Table 1.16 Connection Charges for Three Key-System Business Lines in the Sample Cities (As of October 15), 1990-2002 Table 1.17 Average Local Rates for Businesses with a PBX Trunk in Urban Areas (As of October 15, 2002) Table 1.18 Average Local Rates for a Business with a PBX Trunk in Urban Areas (As of October 15), 1989-2002 Table 1.19 Monthly Telephone Rates in the Sample Cities for a Business with a PBX Trunk (As of October 15), 1990-2002 Table 1.20
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref04.pdf
  • of Sample Cities with Measured/Message Service 83 83 84 84 84 87 87 86 85 85 85 85 85 86 85 Cost of a Five-Minute, Business-Day, Same-Zone Call $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 Basic Connection Charge $71.05$71.36$72.75$72.55$71.41$69.88$67.87$68.47$68.67 $65.83$67.87$67.77$67.04$67.29 $67.26 Additional Connection Charge for Touch-Tone Service 4 1.70 1.89 1.13 1.19 1.17 0.92 0.27 0.17 0.17 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12 a4 a4 Tax, Including 911 Charges 4.06 4.15 4.32 4.33 4.25 4.13 4.17 4.20 4.45 4.13 4.53 4.40 4.69 5.09 5.36 Total Connection Charge $76.81$77.40$78.20$78.07$76.83$74.93$72.31$72.85$73.29 $70.09$72.55$72.29$71.86$72.39 $72.62 Additional Charge if Drop Line and Connection Block Needed $5.92 $7.87 $6.90 $6.83 $6.64 $6.49 $7.28 $6.98 $6.54 $6.54 $6.65 $6.62 $6.62 $6.52 $6.52 Lowest-Cost
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref05.pdf
  • Service 83 83 84 84 84 87 87 86 85 85 85 85 85 86 85 85 Cost of a Five-Minute, Business-Day, Same-Zone Cal $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.10 Basic Connection Charge $71.05$71.36$72.75$72.55$71.41$69.88$67.87$68.47$68.67 $65.83$67.87 $67.77 $67.04 $67.29$67.23 $67.24 Additional Connection Charge for Touch-Tone Service 4 1.70 1.89 1.13 1.19 1.17 0.92 0.27 0.17 0.17 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12 a4 a4 a4 Tax, Including 911 Charges 4.06 4.15 4.32 4.33 4.25 4.13 4.17 4.20 4.45 4.13 4.53 4.40 4.69 5.09 6.95 6.93 Total Connection Charge $76.81$77.40$78.20$78.07$76.83$74.93$72.31$72.85$73.29 $70.09$72.55 $72.29 $71.86 $72.39$74.18 $74.17 Additional Charge if Drop Line and Connection Block Needed $5.92 $7.87 $6.90 $6.83 $6.64 $6.49 $7.28 $6.98 $6.54 $6.54 $6.65
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref97.pdf
  • 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 Unlimited local calling 12.5812.4412.3212.3012.39 13.1013.1213.2213.2813.62 Federal and state SLCs 2.04 2.66 2.67 3.53 3.55 3.56 3.55 3.55 3.55 3.54 Taxes and 911 charges 1.51 1.56 1.58 1.70 1.85 2.00 2.03 2.17 2.24 2.34 Total for rotary service 16.1316.6616.5717.5317.79 18.6618.7018.9419.0719.49 Additional monthly charge for touch-tone service 1.57 1.52 1.54 1.52 1.47 1.17 1.08 1.04 0.74 0.49 (including tax) Total for touch-tone service 17.7018.1818.1119.0519.26 19.8319.7819.9819.8119.98 Lowest generally available monthly rate 5.96 5.81 5.67 5.67 5.68 6.18 6.22 6.43 6.47 6.68 Federal and state SLCs 2.04 2.66 2.67 3.53 3.55 3.56 3.55 3.55 3.55 3.54 Taxes and 911 charges 0.84 0.94 0.91 1.03 1.15 1.28 1.31 1.45 1.50 1.56 Total for rotary service 8.84
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref98.pdf
  • for a Business with a Key System Line as of October 15, 1997......24 Table 1.14 Average Local Rates for a Business with a Key System Line, 1989-1997...............25 Table 1.15 Monthly Rates in the Sample Cities for a Business with a Key System Line, 1990-1997...26 Table 1.16 Connection Charges in the Sample Cities for Three Key System Business Lines, 1990-1997..28 Table 1.17 Average Local Rates for a Business with a PBX Trunk as of October 15, 1997............30 Table 1.18 Average Local Rates for a Business with a PBX Trunk, 1989-1997...................31 iii Table 1.19 Monthly Rates in the Sample Cities for a Business with a PBX Trunk, 1990-1997........32 Table 1.20 Connection Charges in the Sample Cities for Three PBX Trunks, 1990-1997...............34 B. Rates
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref99.pdf
  • for a Business with a Key System Line as of October 15, 1998.....24 Table 1.14 Average Local Rates for a Business with a Key System Line, 1989-1998.............25 Table 1.15 Monthly Rates in the Sample Cities for a Business with a Key System Line, 1990-1998...26 Table 1.16 Connection Charges in the Sample Cities for Three Key System Business Lines, 1990-1998..28 Table 1.17 Average Local Rates for a Business with a PBX Trunk as of October 15, 1998..........30 Table 1.18 Average Local Rates for a Business with a PBX Trunk, 1989-1998..................31 ii Table 1.19 Monthly Rates in the Sample Cities for a Business with a PBX Trunk, 1990-1998.......32 Table 1.20 Connection Charges in the Sample Cities for Three PBX Trunks, 1990-1998..............34 B. Rates
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ror03.pdf
  • 6.79 14.14 40Surewest Telephone 1 15.59 12.19 16.98 13.74 0.00 27.84 23.43 41Telephone Utilities Exchange Carrier Assoc. 17.91 11.25 53.69 42TXU Communications Telephone Company, Inc. 15.11 8.97 31.78 28.27 0.00 24.45 24.70 43Utelco, Inc. 44Virgin Islands Telephone Corporation 15.88 10.96 43.04 5.71 (271.38) 55.66 23.46 45Warwick Valley Telephone Company 13.05 11.34 11.66 14.60 0.00 14.13 14.58 46Yates City Telephone Company 1.17 12.35 163.11 (41.25) 137.30 (29.08) 1 Formerly known as Roseville Telephone Company. Maximum Rate of Return 29.48%12.95%168.35%302.78% 9,587.82%137.30%37.92% Minimum Rate of Return 1.17 1.44 (8.85) (41.25) (2,646.38) 1.11 (29.08) Weighted Arithmetic Mean 13.20 11.84 16.96 11.04 (32.20) 12.17 11.53 Standard Deviation 3.60 1.27 16.24 8.54 672.56 10.74 7.37
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ror96.pdf
  • 18.65 13.32 4.72 27.72 19.47 25.31 28MOULTRIE INDEPENDENT TELEPHONE COMPANY 9.71 12.16 6.93 7.00 18.02 8.44 29ROSEVILLE TELEPHONE COMPANY 12.11 12.03 11.47 12.72 (44.27) 11.90 12.24 30TELEPHONE UTILITIES EXCHANGE CARRIER ASSOC 12.51 11.25 12.48 12.15 19.14 14.39 31UTELCO, INC. 11.74 32VIRGIN ISLANDS TELEPHONE CORPORATION 11.86 12.09 27.32 12.08 (107.69) 6.05 7.22 33WARWICK VALLEY TELEPHONE COMPANY 8.98 12.24 8.24 8.70 0.00 1.17 34WEST RIVER MUTUAL AID TELEPHONE CORP. 13.12 13.22 25.17 13.90 9.09 12.12 35WOODHULL TELEPHONE COMPANY 19.08 11.63 (190.63) 20.76 28.96 21.58 1/ Report is filed for the period of 11/1/93 - 12/31/94. 2/ Report is for the cumulative period 1/1/93 - 10/31/93. 3/ On November 1, 1993, ALLTEL And GTE closed an agreement to exchange certain telephone subsidiary assets with
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/strev-97.pdf
  • 0.55 (4,713) (0.33) NEW HAMPSHIRE 2,474 0.25 5,589 0.57 (3,115) (0.32) NEW JERSEY 2,012 0.03 36,363 0.49 (34,351) (0.46) NEW MEXICO 19,261 1.78 5,717 0.53 13,544 1.25 NEW YORK 10,665 0.07 60,270 0.40 (49,605) (0.33) NORTH CAROLINA 21,837 0.39 23,299 0.41 (1,462) (0.03) NORTH DAKOTA 5,075 1.05 2,312 0.48 2,763 0.57 OHIO 4,477 0.06 27,938 0.35 (23,461) (0.29) OKLAHOMA 27,353 1.17 9,241 0.39 18,113 0.77 OREGON 18,563 0.76 10,774 0.44 7,789 0.32 PENNSYLVANIA 1,384 0.01 35,424 0.37 (34,040) (0.36) RHODE ISLAND 0 0.00 3,774 0.48 (3,774) (0.48) SOUTH CAROLINA 23,681 0.92 11,794 0.46 11,887 0.46 SOUTH DAKOTA 3,160 0.65 2,497 0.51 663 0.14 TENNESSEE 8,152 0.21 16,486 0.42 (8,334) (0.21) TEXAS 75,838 0.53 50,820 0.35 25,018 0.17 UTAH 2,982 0.23 6,281
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/strev-99.pdf
  • 95.29 Oklahoma 28.14 4.53 9.44 27.73 0.88 0.70 71.42 18.10 89.52 Oregon 27.25 5.37 10.32 32.14 0.95 0.95 76.97 19.63 96.59 Pennsylvania 22.18 4.39 14.81 25.41 2.08 0.61 69.47 14.93 84.39 Rhode Island 24.60 4.68 9.44 35.80 1.02 0.80 76.34 18.81 95.15 South Carolina 36.57 4.87 11.40 32.96 0.91 0.81 87.52 22.30 109.82 South Dakota 26.22 5.05 13.46 38.75 0.99 1.17 85.64 23.51 109.14 Tennessee 33.27 4.77 7.93 29.19 1.61 0.72 77.49 20.26 97.75 Texas 29.01 4.64 14.36 23.76 1.90 0.74 74.40 20.08 94.48 Utah 26.92 5.58 8.16 34.05 1.87 0.91 77.48 25.00 102.48 Vermont 30.46 4.51 13.59 37.19 0.90 1.05 87.69 21.27 108.96 Virginia 27.69 4.86 11.36 34.24 0.79 0.80 79.74 17.84 97.59 Washington 25.83 5.20 12.56 30.90 1.57 0.92
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend100.pdf
  • Federal State or Federal State Federal Federal and State Jurisdiction Support Support Match Support Support Alabama $5.25 $3.50 $1.75 $7.00 $10.50 Alaska 5.25 3.50 1.75 7.00 10.50 American Samoa 5.25 0 0 5.25 5.25 Arizona 5.25 2.28 1.14 6.39 8.67 Arkansas 5.25 0 0 5.25 5.25 California 5.25 3.50 1.75 7.00 10.50 Colorado 5.25 3.50 1.75 7.00 10.50 Connecticut 5.25 1.17 0.58 5.83 7.00 Delaware 5.25 0 0 5.25 5.25 District of Columbia 5.25 3.50 1.75 7.00 10.50 Florida 5.25 3.50 1.75 7.00 10.50 Georgia 5.25 3.50 1.75 7.00 10.50 Guam 5.25 3.50 1.75 7.00 10.50 Hawaii 5.25 0 0 5.25 5.25 Idaho 5.25 3.50 1.75 7.00 10.50 Illinois 5.25 1.50 0.75 6.00 7.50 Indiana 5.25 0 0 5.25 5.25 Iowa
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend199.pdf
  • FEDERAL STATE OR FEDERAL STATE FEDERAL FEDERAL AND STATE JURISDICTION SUPPORT SUPPORT* MATCH SUPPORT SUPPORT ALABAMA $5.25 $3.50 $1.75 $7.00 $10.50 ALASKA 5.25 3.50 1.75 7.00 10.50 AMERICAN SAMOA 5.25 0 0 5.25 5.25 ARIZONA** 5.25 2.28 1.14 6.39 8.67 ARKANSAS 5.25 0 0 5.25 5.25 CALIFORNIA 5.25 3.50 1.75 7.00 10.50 COLORADO 5.25 3.50 1.75 7.00 10.50 CONNECTICUT 5.25 1.17 0.58 5.83 7.00 DELAWARE 5.25 0 0 5.25 5.25 DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA 5.25 3.50 1.75 7.00 10.50 FLORIDA 5.25 3.50 1.75 7.00 10.50 GEORGIA 5.25 3.50 1.75 7.00 10.50 GUAM 5.25 0 0 5.25 5.25 HAWAII** 5.25 0 0 5.25 5.25 IDAHO 5.25 3.50 1.75 7.00 10.50 ILLINOIS 5.25 0 0 5.25 5.25 INDIANA 5.25 0 0 5.25 5.25 IOWA
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend200.pdf
  • 50,003,799 7,752,479 0.18 United States Cellular Corporation 20,693,200 37,522,689 17,024,260 0.40 URSUS Telecom Corporation 5,201,718 19,096,929 12,547,739 0.29 US West Communications, Inc. 6,239,560 124,791,200 38,997,250 0.92 USA Global Link, Inc. 6,369,622 32,541,627 10,526,082 0.25 USC Telecom, Inc. 2,042,191 40,843,814 12,763,692 0.30 VarTec Telecom, Inc. 17,583,515 67,676,456 62,434,785 1.47 VDC Telecommunications, Inc. 5,919,242 17,089,568 4,671,864 0.11 Verizon Wireless 56,536,041 211,282,250 49,806,763 1.17 VoiceStream Wireless Corporation 2,899,603 7,793,712 5,624,342 0.13 Winstar Communications, Inc. 3,053,257 10,767,053 5,378,260 0.13 World Access Telecommunications Group, Inc. 211,462,004 1,238,406,098 329,380,477 7.74 Total for 366 Carriers Not Shown Above 62,559,645 274,095,569 104,701,782 2.46 Grand Total 2,359,499,611 14,234,575,941 $4,254,099,679 100.00% Source: Industry Analysis Division, Section 43.61 International Telecommunications Data. Data are preliminary. 6 - 7 7-1 7 Lifeline In 1984,
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend298.pdf
  • Touch-tone 2.48 2.39 1.87 1.73 1.68 1.22 0.98 0.83 0.45 Tax including 911 Charges 4.41 4.53 4.56 4.77 4.86 4.83 5.01 5.13 5.20 Total Monthly Charge for Measured/Message Service 42.72 42.83 43.44 43.82 44.26 43.72 43.75 43.84 43.58 Cost of a Five-minute Business-day Same-zone Call $0.0929$0.0933$0.0912$0.0931$0.0942$0.0923$0.0925$0.0923$0.0921 Basic Connection Charge $71.05$71.36$72.75$72.55$71.41$69.88$67.87$68.47$68.58 Additional Connection Charge for Touch-tone Service 1.70 1.89 1.13 1.19 1.17 0.92 0.27 0.17 0.17 Tax 4.06 4.15 4.32 4.33 4.25 4.13 4.17 4.2 4.42 Total Connection Charge 76.81 77.40 78.20 78.07 76.83 74.93 72.31 72.85 73.18 Additional Charge if Drop Line and Connection Block Needed 5.92 7.87 6.90 6.83 6.64 6.49 7.28 6.98 6.86 Lowest-cost Inside Wiring Maintenance Plan $1.78 $1.91 $2.05 $2.03 $2.08 $2.26 $2.39 $2.63 $2.76 *Rate is
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend299.pdf
  • 38,380 59,227 RBOCs 0.08 0.00 0.73 0.29 2.16 141,261 266,608 410,916 Aliant 0.00 0.00 1.34 0.32 3.41 248 512 764 Cincinnati Bell 0.00 0.00 0.70 0.17 1.79 1,077 2,031 3,110 Citizens 2.43 0.74 1.67 0.86 8.52 1,252 1,318 2,572 Frontier 1.04 0.01 1.11 0.46 4.34 757 1,723 2,483 GTE 1.86 0.34 0.91 0.24 4.70 18,636 31,256 51,990 SNET 0.00 0.00 1.17 0.29 3.00 3,323 5,259 8,624 Sprint Local 0.83 0.08 1.01 0.21 3.48 8,444 13,871 22,420 Independent Price Caps 1.35 0.23 0.98 0.26 4.22 33,737 55,970 91,963 All Price Caps 0.32 0.04 0.77 0.28 2.55 174,998 322,578 502,879 NECA 1.00 1.33 3.66 0.17 10.31 12,885 14,715 14,782 All Price Caps And NECA 0.37 0.10 0.86 0.28 2.82 187,883 337,293 517,661 Source:
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend502.pdf
  • Total Federal State or Jurisdiction Federal State Match Federal and State Support Support Support Support Alabama $6.75 $3.50 $1.75 $8.50 $12.00 Alaska 6.75 3.50 1.75 8.50 12.00 American Samoa 6.75 0.00 0.00 6.75 6.75 Arizona 6.75 3.50 1.75 8.50 12.00 Arkansas 6.75 0.00 0.00 6.75 6.75 California 6.15/6.751 3.50 1.75 7.90/8.50 11.40/12.00 Colorado 6.75 3.50 1.75 8.50 12.00 Connecticut 6.75 1.17 0.58 7.33 8.50 Delaware 6.75 0.00 0.00 6.75 6.75 District of Columbia 5.56 3.50 1.75 7.31 10.81 Florida 6.75 3.50 1.75 8.50 12.00 Georgia 6.75 3.50 1.75 8.50 12.00 Guam 6.75 3.50 1.75 8.50 12.00 Hawaii 6.75 0.00 0.00 6.75 6.75 Idaho 6.75 3.50 1.75 8.50 12.00 Illinois 6.75 1.50 0.75 7.50 9.00 Indiana 6.75 0.00 0.00 6.75 6.75 Iowa
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend504.pdf
  • 84 84 84 87 87 86 85 85 85 85 85 86 Cost of a Five-Minute Same-Zone Business-Day Call $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.10 $0.09 $0.09 Basic Connection Charge $71.05 $71.36 $72.75 $72.55 $71.41 $69.88 $67.87 $68.47 $68.67 $65.83 $67.87 $67.77 $67.04 $67.25 Additional Connection Charge for Touch-Tone Service 1.70 1.89 1.13 1.19 1.17 0.92 0.27 0.17 0.17 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12 Taxes, Including 911 Charges 4.06 4.15 4.32 4.33 4.25 4.13 4.17 4.20 4.45 4.13 4.53 4.40 4.69 4.97 Total Connection Charge $76.81 $77.40 $78.20 $78.07 $76.83 $74.93 $72.31 $72.85 $73.29 $70.09 $72.55 $72.29 $71.86 $72.35 Additional Charge if Drop Line and Connection Block Needed $5.92 $7.87 $6.90 $6.83 $6.64 $6.49 $7.28
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend605.pdf
  • 85 85 85 85 86 85 85 Cost of a Five-Minute Same-Zone Business-Day Call $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.10 $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.10 Basic Connection Charge $71.05 $71.36 $72.75 $72.55 $71.41 $69.88 $67.87 $68.47 $68.67 $65.83 $67.87 $67.77 $67.04 $67.29 $67.23 $67.24 Additional Connection Charge for Touch-Tone Service 4 1.70 1.89 1.13 1.19 1.17 0.92 0.27 0.17 0.17 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12 4 4 4 Taxes, Including 911 Charges 4.06 4.15 4.32 4.33 4.25 4.13 4.17 4.20 4.45 4.13 4.53 4.40 4.69 5.09 6.95 6.93 Total Connection Charge $76.81 $77.40 $78.20 $78.07 $76.83 $74.93 $72.31 $72.85 $73.29 $70.09 $72.55 $72.29 $71.86 $72.39 $74.18 $74.17 Additional Charge if Drop Line and Connection Block Needed $5.92
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend801.pdf
  • Federal State or Jurisdiction Federal State Federal Federal and State Support Support Match Support Support Alabama $6.10 $3.50 $1.75 $7.85 $11.35 Alaska 6.10 3.50 1.75 7.85 11.35 American Samoa 6.10 0.00 0.00 6.10 6.10 Arizona 6.10 3.50 1.14 7.24 10.74 Arkansas 6.10 0.00 0.00 6.10 6.10 California 6.10 3.50 1.75 7.85 11.35 Colorado 6.10 3.50 1.75 7.85 11.35 Connecticut 6.10 1.17 0.58 6.68 7.85 Delaware 6.10 0.00 0.00 6.10 6.10 District of Columbia 6.10 3.50 1.75 7.85 11.35 Florida 6.10 3.50 1.75 7.85 11.35 Georgia 6.10 3.50 1.75 7.85 11.35 Guam 6.10 3.50 1.75 7.85 11.35 Hawaii 6.10 0.00 0.00 6.10 6.10 Idaho 6.10 3.50 1.75 7.85 11.35 Illinois 6.10 1.50 0.75 6.85 8.35 Indiana 6.10 0.00 0.00 6.10 6.10 Iowa
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend803.pdf
  • 722,034,414 88,524,359 1.59 SBC Communications, Inc. 16,915,381 129,768,660 57,472,407 1.03 Sprint Corporation 110,098,596 567,570,336 146,381,204 2.63 Sprint PCS 9,453,853 50,419,403 28,787,634 0.52 Startec Global Communications Corp. 56,161,433 378,562,427 72,000,682 1.29 Talk America Inc. 64,152,315 453,142,969 26,863,417 0.48 TeleDirect Telecommunications Group, LLC 19,933,965 108,294,945 26,107,000 0.47 Telenational Communication, Inc. d/b/a Worldport 4,218,807 42,188,072 5,273,509 0.09 Telstar International, Inc. 31,963,374 318,669,847 64,950,978 1.17 UniPlex Telecom Technologies, Inc. 7,260,180 49,732,233 9,967,121 0.18 VarTec Telecom, Inc. 23,870,955 265,964,939 71,742,296 1.29 Verizon Wireless 39,944,292 187,738,171 42,112,041 0.76 Verizon (incl. Verizon LD, PRTC, Pacifica & Enterprise) 57,750,642 439,114,099 253,635,128 4.56 Williams Communications, Inc. 56,818,838 407,369,824 54,565,336 0.98 Working Assets Funding Services, Inc. 3,369,836 29,208,702 15,214,721 0.27 WorldCom, Inc. now d/b/a MCI 191,013,658 933,491,068 225,438,093 4.05 XO Communications,
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Intl/itltrd98.pdf
  • 1966 2/ 32 100 48 53 19 30 3.10 1.47 1.63 1.59 1.61 1967 2/ 40 114 55 60 23 32 2.88 1.38 1.50 1.36 1.45 1968 46 127 62 65 28 40 2.73 1.33 1.41 1.42 1.41 1969 65 172 83 89 38 52 2.66 1.28 1.38 1.35 1.37 1970 81 197 99 98 51 60 2.43 1.22 1.21 1.17 1.19 1971 101 237 121 117 68 75 2.35 1.20 1.16 1.10 1.13 1972 127 292 148 144 92 99 2.31 1.17 1.14 1.08 1.11 1973 159 365 184 180 112 120 2.29 1.16 1.13 1.08 1.11 1974 191 429 217 212 142 152 2.25 1.14 1.11 1.07 1.09 1975 219 490 247 243 167 177 2.23 1.13 1.11 1.06
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Intl/itltrd99.pdf
  • 1966 2/ 32 100 48 53 19 30 3.10 1.47 1.63 1.59 1.61 1967 2/ 40 114 55 60 23 32 2.88 1.38 1.50 1.36 1.45 1968 46 127 62 65 28 40 2.73 1.33 1.41 1.42 1.41 1969 65 172 83 89 38 52 2.66 1.28 1.38 1.35 1.37 1970 81 197 99 98 51 60 2.43 1.22 1.21 1.17 1.19 1971 101 237 121 117 68 75 2.35 1.20 1.16 1.10 1.13 1972 127 292 148 144 92 99 2.31 1.17 1.14 1.08 1.11 1973 159 365 184 180 112 120 2.29 1.16 1.13 1.08 1.11 1974 191 429 217 212 142 152 2.25 1.14 1.11 1.07 1.09 1975 219 490 247 243 167 177 2.23 1.13 1.11 1.06
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Intl/itrnd00.pdf
  • 1.60 1.61 1966 32.3 100.1 47.6 52.5 18.9 30.1 3.10 1.47 1.63 1.59 1.61 1967 39.7 114.2 54.6 59.6 23.4 31.8 2.88 1.38 1.50 1.36 1.45 1968 46.4 126.9 61.5 65.4 28.2 40.0 2.73 1.33 1.41 1.42 1.41 1969 64.6 172.0 82.7 89.4 38.3 51.6 2.66 1.28 1.38 1.35 1.37 1970 81.1 196.6 98.9 97.7 51.0 59.8 2.43 1.22 1.21 1.17 1.19 1971 100.9 237.4 120.7 116.6 68.4 75.1 2.35 1.20 1.16 1.10 1.13 1972 126.5 291.8 148.2 143.6 91.7 98.6 2.31 1.17 1.14 1.08 1.11 1973 159.3 364.9 184.4 180.5 111.5 120.2 2.29 1.16 1.13 1.08 1.11 1974 190.7 428.7 216.6 212.1 142.0 152.2 2.25 1.14 1.11 1.07 1.09 1975 219.4 490.2 247.4 242.9 167.0 176.9 2.23 1.13 1.11 1.06
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Intl/itrnd01.pdf
  • 1.60 1.61 1966 32.3 100.1 47.6 52.5 18.9 30.1 3.10 1.47 1.63 1.59 1.61 1967 39.7 114.2 54.6 59.6 23.4 31.8 2.88 1.38 1.50 1.36 1.45 1968 46.4 126.9 61.5 65.4 28.2 40.0 2.73 1.33 1.41 1.42 1.41 1969 64.6 172.0 82.7 89.4 38.3 51.6 2.66 1.28 1.38 1.35 1.37 1970 81.1 196.6 98.9 97.7 51.0 59.8 2.43 1.22 1.21 1.17 1.19 1971 100.9 237.4 120.7 116.6 68.4 75.1 2.35 1.20 1.16 1.10 1.13 1972 126.5 291.8 148.2 143.6 91.7 98.6 2.31 1.17 1.14 1.08 1.11 1973 159.3 364.9 184.4 180.5 111.5 120.2 2.29 1.16 1.13 1.08 1.11 1974 190.7 428.7 216.6 212.1 142.0 152.2 2.25 1.14 1.11 1.07 1.09 1975 219.4 490.2 247.4 242.9 167.0 176.9 2.23 1.13 1.11 1.06
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr03-1.pdf
  • incumbent local exchange carriers (ILECs) with annual operating revenues over $117 million for 2000. The Statistics of Communications Common Carriers revenue data represent approximately 93 percent of the local telephone industry based on USF loops. Here, data from the Statistics of Communications Common Carriers are expanded to include the entire ILEC industry based on USF loops. Column 1 of Table 1.17 shows USF loops at year-end 2001. Column 2 shows the percent of the ILEC industry that is included in the tables in the Statistics of Communications Common Carriers. It is the average for year-end 2000 and 2001 data.24 The adjustment formula in Column 3 is (100/Column 2). In Table 1.18, ILECs' local exchange revenues are allocated based on local exchange
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr03-3.pdf
  • 12.33 57.67 401724 C SOUTHWEST ARKANSAS TEL. COOP. INC. 4.53 1.02 3.47 3.98 401726 C TRI-COUNTY TEL. CO. INC.-AR 26.01 -5.95 33.98 59.64 401727 C CENTURYTEL OF SOUTH ARKANSAS, INC. 0.98 3.75 -2.67 -2.67 401729 C WALNUT HILL TELEPHONE COMPANY 1.30 1.56 -0.26 -0.53 401733 C YELCOT TEL. CO.,INC. 13.47 3.18 9.98 25.19 401734 C YELL COUNTY TELEPHONE COMPANY 8.75 1.17 7.50 15.09 403031 C SCOTT COUNTY TELEPHONE COMPANY 3.87 -12.00 18.03 7.03 405211 C SOUTHWESTERN BELL-ARKANSAS 3.14 -2.99 6.32 0.00 TOTAL: CALIFORNIA 7.83 -1.65 9.64 2.63 542301 C CALAVERAS TELEPHONE COMPANY 15.17 3.42 11.37 23.27 542302 C VERIZON CALIFORNIA INC.-CA (CONTEL) 4.25 2.25 1.96 0.00 542308 C CITIZENS UTILITIES CO. OF CALIF. 5.50 4.81 0.66 -3.50 542311 C CAL-ORE TELEPHONE
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr03-7.pdf
  • 43.35 44.45 45.57 46.40 Number of Sample Cities with Measured/Message Service 83 83 84 84 84 87 87 86 85 85 85 85 85 86 Cost of a Five-Minute Business-Day Same-Zone Call $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.10 $0.09 $0.09 Basic Connection Charge $71.05$71.36$72.75$72.55$71.41$69.88$67.87$68.47$68.67$65.83$67.87$67.77$67.04$67.25 Additional Connection Charge for Touch-Tone Service 1.70 1.89 1.13 1.19 1.17 0.92 0.27 0.17 0.17 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12 Taxes 4.06 4.15 4.32 4.33 4.25 4.13 4.17 4.20 4.45 4.13 4.53 4.40 4.69 4.97 Total Connection Charge 76.81 77.40 78.20 78.07 76.83 74.93 72.31 72.85 73.29 70.09 72.55 72.29 71.86 72.35 Additional Charge If Drop Line and Connection Block Needed $5.92 $7.87 $6.90 $6.83 $6.64 $6.49 $7.28 $6.98 $6.54 $6.54
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr03-intro.pdf
  • by Program ................................................. Table 1.4 Customer Perception Surveys - Percentage of Customers Dissatisfied .................. Table 9.4 Customer Perception Surveys - Sample Sizes ........................................................ Table 9.5 Expenses and Taxes ................................................................................................ Table 11.2 Expenses - Total Operating ..................................................................................... Table 11.9 Factors - Interstate DEM - Unweighted ................................................... Table 8.11 Factors - Interstate DEM - Weighted ...................................................... Table 8.12 General Information .......................................................................... Table 1.17 High-Cost Loop Fund Formulas ....................................................................... Table 3.2 High-Cost Loop Support - 2001 Data - by Jurisdiction...................................... Table 3.17 High-Cost Loop Support - 2001 Data - by Study Area .......................................Table 3.31 High-Cost Loop Support Payment History ............................................................ Table 3.3 High-Cost Loop Support Payment Projections by Jurisdiction............................ Table 3.8 High-Cost Loop Support Payment Projections by Study Area ............................ Table 3.23 High-Cost Loop
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr04-1.pdf
  • operating revenues over $119 million for 2001 and revenues over $121 million in 2002. The Statistics of Communications Common Carriers revenue data represent approximately 92 percent of the local telephone industry based on USF loops. Here, data from the Statistics of Communications Common Carriers are expanded to include the entire ILEC industry based on USF loops. Column 1 of Table 1.17 shows USF loops at year-end 2002. Column 2 shows the percent of the ILEC industry that is included in the tables in the Statistics of Communications Common Carriers. It is the average for year-end 2001 and 2002 data.25 The adjustment formula in Column 3 is (100/Column 2). 21 Industry Analysis and Technology Division, Wireline Competition Bureau, Statistics of Communications Common
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr04-2.pdf
  • 8.22 10.00 9.59 8.22 13.50 12.30 Arkansas 7.04 8.25 7.47 0.00 3.50 0.92 0.00 1.75 0.46 7.04 10.00 7.93 7.04 13.50 8.85 California 5.25 8.25 6.66 2.18 3.50 2.46 1.09 1.75 1.23 6.34 10.00 7.89 8.52 13.50 10.35 Colorado 8.25 8.25 8.25 0.00 3.50 3.49 0.00 1.75 1.75 8.25 10.00 10.00 8.25 13.50 13.49 Connecticut 6.10 7.53 7.53 1.18 1.18 1.17 0.59 0.59 0.59 6.69 8.12 8.11 7.87 9.30 9.28 Delaware 8.23 8.23 8.23 2.30 2.30 2.30 1.15 1.15 1.15 9.38 9.38 9.38 11.68 11.68 11.68 District of Columbia 5.62 5.62 5.62 3.50 3.50 3.50 1.75 1.75 1.75 7.37 7.37 7.37 10.87 10.87 10.87 Florida 8.25 8.25 8.25 3.04 3.50 3.50 1.52 1.75 1.75 9.77 10.00 10.00 12.81 13.50 13.49 Georgia
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr04-3.pdf
  • 11.80 13.54 401721 C RICE BELT TEL. CO.,INC. -11.72 -1.50 -10.38 -32.66 401722 A E. RITTER TELEPHONE COMPANY 4.90 -4.53 9.88 30.23 401724 C SOUTHWEST ARKANSAS TEL. COOP. INC. -0.43 1.18 -1.59 -6.00 401726 C TRI-COUNTY TEL. CO. INC.-AR -10.48 -2.97 -7.74 -18.69 401727 C CENTURYTEL OF SOUTH ARKANSAS, INC. 1.43 2.20 -0.75 -1.50 401729 C WALNUT HILL TELEPHONE COMPANY -1.17 0.82 -1.97 -3.94 401733 C YELCOT TEL. CO.,INC. -3.46 0.07 -3.53 -16.69 401734 C YELL COUNTY TELEPHONE COMPANY 3.50 -0.50 4.02 3.21 403031 C SCOTT COUNTY TELEPHONE COMPANY -5.37 9.09 -13.26 -9.58 405211 C SOUTHWESTERN BELL-ARKANSAS -17.32 -4.90 -13.06 0.00 CALIFORNIA Total -4.13 -3.00 -1.16 7.62 542301 C CALAVERAS TELEPHONE COMPANY 5.69 3.00 2.61 4.17 542302 C VERIZON CALIFORNIA INC.-CA
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr04-7.pdf
  • 44.61 44.60 Number of Sample Cities with Measured/Message Service 83 83 84 84 84 87 87 86 85 85 85 85 85 86 85 Cost of a Five-Minute Business-Day Same-Zone Call $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.10 $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 Basic Connection Charge $71.05$71.36$72.75$72.55$71.41$69.88$67.87$68.47$68.67$65.83$67.87$67.77$67.04$67.29$67.26 Additional Connection Charge for Touch-Tone Service**** 1.70 1.89 1.13 1.19 1.17 0.92 0.27 0.17 0.17 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12 **** **** Taxes 4.06 4.15 4.32 4.33 4.25 4.13 4.17 4.20 4.45 4.13 4.53 4.40 4.69 5.09 5.36 Total Connection Charge 76.81 77.40 78.20 78.07 76.83 74.93 72.31 72.85 73.29 70.09 72.55 72.29 71.86 72.39 72.62 Additional Charge If Drop Line and Connection Block Needed $5.92 $7.87 $6.90 $6.83 $6.64 $6.49 $7.28
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr04-intro.pdf
  • and Investment........................................................... 11-1 to 11-55 2 Index of Tables and Charts Access Charges - Interstate - Per Line .................................................................... Table 7.11 Access Charges - Interstate - Per Line - by Carrier ................................................ Table 7.13 Access Charges - Interstate - Per Minute ................................................................Table 7.12 Access Charges - Interstate - Per Minute - by Carrier .............................................. Table 7.14 Adjustment Formula ......................................................................... Table 1.17 Carrier Telecommunications Revenues Reported on FCC Form 499-Q .............. Table 1.9 Changes in Local Exchange Carriers ..................................................... Table 3.36 Consumer Price Indices - Levels ......................................................................... Chart 7.1 Consumer Price Indices - Annual Percentage Changes ...................................... Chart 7.2 Consumer Price Indices - Annual Percentage Changes - Telephone Components .. Chart 7.3 Consumer Price Indices - Average Annual Rates of Change .................................
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr98-7.pdf
  • Touch-tone 2.48 2.39 1.87 1.73 1.68 1.22 0.98 0.83 0.45 Tax including 911 Charges 4.41 4.53 4.56 4.77 4.86 4.83 5.01 5.13 5.20 Total Monthly Charge for Measured/Message Service 42.72 42.83 43.44 43.82 44.26 43.72 43.75 43.84 43.58 Cost of a Five-minute Business-day Same-zone Call $0.0929$0.0933$0.0912$0.0931$0.0942$0.0923$0.0925$0.0923$0.0921 Basic Connection Charge $71.05$71.36$72.75$72.55$71.41$69.88$67.87$68.47$68.58 Additional Connection Charge for Touch-tone Service 1.70 1.89 1.13 1.19 1.17 0.92 0.27 0.17 0.17 Tax 4.06 4.15 4.32 4.33 4.25 4.13 4.17 4.2 4.42 Total Connection Charge 76.81 77.40 78.20 78.07 76.83 74.93 72.31 72.85 73.18 Additional Charge if Drop Line and Connection Block Needed 5.92 7.87 6.90 6.83 6.64 6.49 7.28 6.98 6.86 Lowest-cost Inside Wiring Maintenance Plan $1.78 $1.91 $2.05 $2.03 $2.08 $2.26 $2.39 $2.63 $2.76 *Rate is
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrd99-2.pdf
  • FEDERAL STATE OR FEDERAL STATE FEDERAL FEDERAL AND STATE JURISDICTION SUPPORT SUPPORT MATCH SUPPORT SUPPORT ALABAMA $5.25 $3.50 $1.75 $7.00 $10.50 ALASKA 5.25 3.50 1.75 7.00 10.50 AMERICAN SAMOA 5.25 0.00 0.00 5.25 5.25 ARIZONA 5.25 2.28 1.14 6.39 8.67 ARKANSAS 5.25 0.00 0.00 5.25 5.25 CALIFORNIA 5.25 3.50 1.75 7.00 10.50 COLORADO 5.25 3.50 1.75 7.00 10.50 CONNECTICUT 5.25 1.17 0.58 5.83 7.00 DELAWARE 5.25 0.00 0.00 5.25 5.25 DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA 5.25 3.50 1.75 7.00 10.50 FLORIDA 5.25 3.50 1.75 7.00 10.50 GEORGIA 5.25 3.50 1.75 7.00 10.50 GUAM 5.25 3.50 1.75 7.00 5.25 HAWAII 5.25 0.00 0.00 5.25 5.25 IDAHO 5.25 3.50 1.75 7.00 10.50 ILLINOIS 5.25 1.50 0.75 6.00 7.50 INDIANA 5.25 0.00 0.00 5.25 5.25 IOWA
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrd99-7.pdf
  • 1.34 1954 22 22 26.9 1.35 1.33 1955 23 22 26.8 1.40 1.34 1956 23 22 27.2 1.40 1.32 1957 24 22 28.1 1.38 1.28 1958 24 22 28.9 1.35 1.24 1959 24 22 29.1 1.35 1.23 1960 24 22 29.6 1.33 1.21 1961 25 22 29.9 1.36 1.20 1962 25 22 30.2 1.36 1.19 1963 25 22 30.6 1.32 1.17 1964 25 22 31.0 1.31 1.16 1965 24 22 31.5 1.24 1.14 1966 24 22 32.4 1.22 1.11 1967 24 22 33.4 1.18 1.07 1968 24 22 34.8 1.11 1.03 1969 24 22 36.7 1.07 0.98 * Estimates for 1930 through 1981 are based on information in AT&T Long Lines Statistics, 1930-1963; 1946-1970, and 1960-1981 and appear to represent data
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrj99-2.pdf
  • FEDERAL STATE OR FEDERAL STATE FEDERAL FEDERAL AND STATE JURISDICTION SUPPORT SUPPORT MATCH SUPPORT SUPPORT ALABAMA $5.25 $3.50 $1.75 $7.00 $10.50 ALASKA 5.25 3.50 1.75 7.00 10.50 AMERICAN SAMOA 5.25 0 0 5.25 5.25 ARIZONA 5.25 2.28 1.14 6.39 8.67 ARKANSAS 5.25 0 0 5.25 5.25 CALIFORNIA 5.25 3.50 1.75 7.00 10.50 COLORADO 5.25 3.50 1.75 7.00 10.50 CONNECTICUT 5.25 1.17 0.58 5.83 7.00 DELAWARE 5.25 0 0 5.25 5.25 DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA 5.25 3.50 1.75 7.00 10.50 FLORIDA 5.25 3.50 1.75 7.00 10.50 GEORGIA 5.25 3.50 1.75 7.00 10.50 GUAM 5.25 0 0 5.25 5.25 HAWAII 5.25 0 0 5.25 5.25 IDAHO 5.25 3.50 1.75 7.00 10.50 ILLINOIS 5.25 1.50 0.75 6.00 7.50 INDIANA 5.25 0 0 5.25 5.25 IOWA
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrj99-7.pdf
  • 43.84 43.57 43.35 Number of Sample Cities with Measured/Message Service 83 83 84 84 84 87 87 86 85 85 Cost of a Five-minute Business-day Same-zone Call 9.29¢ 9.33¢ 9.12¢ 9.31¢ 9.42¢ 9.23¢ 9.25¢ 9.23¢ 9.21¢ 9.18¢ Basic Connection Charge $71.05 $71.36 $72.75 $72.55 $71.41 $69.88 $67.87 $68.47 $68.67 $65.83 Additional Connection Charge for Touch-tone Service 1.70 1.89 1.13 1.19 1.17 0.92 0.27 0.17 0.17 0.12 Other Mandatory Payments 4.06 4.15 4.32 4.33 4.25 4.13 4.17 4.20 4.45 4.13 Total Connection Charge 76.81 77.40 78.20 78.07 76.83 74.93 72.31 72.85 73.29 70.09 Additional Charge if Drop Line and Connection Block Needed 5.92 7.87 6.90 6.83 6.64 6.49 7.28 6.98 6.54 6.54 Lowest-cost Inside Wiring Maintenance Plan $1.78 $1.91 $2.05 $2.03 $2.08
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrs00-0.pdf
  • FEDERAL STATE OR FEDERAL STATE FEDERAL FEDERAL AND STATE JURISDICTION SUPPORT SUPPORT MATCH SUPPORT SUPPORT ALABAMA $6.10 $3.50 $1.75 $7.85 $11.35 ALASKA 6.10 3.50 1.75 7.85 11.35 AMERICAN SAMOA 6.10 0.00 0.00 6.10 6.10 ARIZONA 6.10 3.50 1.14 7.24 10.74 ARKANSAS 6.10 0.00 0.00 6.10 6.10 CALIFORNIA 6.10 3.50 1.75 7.85 11.35 COLORADO 6.10 3.50 1.75 7.85 11.35 CONNECTICUT 6.10 1.17 0.58 6.68 7.85 DELAWARE 6.10 0.00 0.00 6.10 6.10 DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA 6.10 3.50 1.75 7.85 11.35 FLORIDA 6.10 3.50 1.75 7.85 11.35 GEORGIA 6.10 3.50 1.75 7.85 11.35 GUAM 6.10 3.50 1.75 7.85 11.35 HAWAII 6.10 0.00 0.00 6.10 6.10 IDAHO 6.10 3.50 1.75 7.85 11.35 ILLINOIS 6.10 1.50 0.75 6.85 8.35 INDIANA 6.10 0.00 0.00 6.10 6.10 IOWA
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrs01-0.pdf
  • Federal State or Federal State Federal Federal and State Jurisdiction Support Support Match Support Support Alabama $6.10 $3.50 $1.75 $7.85 $11.35 Alaska 6.10 3.50 1.75 7.85 11.35 American Samoa 6.10 0.00 0.00 6.10 6.10 Arizona 6.10 3.50 1.14 7.24 10.74 Arkansas 6.10 0.00 0.00 6.10 6.10 California 6.10 3.50 1.75 7.85 11.35 Colorado 6.10 3.50 1.75 7.85 11.35 Connecticut 6.10 1.17 0.58 6.68 7.85 Delaware 6.10 0.00 0.00 6.10 6.10 District of Columbia 6.10 3.50 1.75 7.85 11.35 Florida 6.10 3.50 1.75 7.85 11.35 Georgia 6.10 3.50 1.75 7.85 11.35 Guam 6.10 3.50 1.75 7.85 11.35 Hawaii 6.10 0.00 0.00 6.10 6.10 Idaho 6.10 3.50 1.75 7.85 11.35 Illinois 6.10 1.50 0.75 6.85 8.35 Indiana 6.10 0.00 0.00 6.10 6.10 Iowa
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrs02-0.pdf
  • by Program ................................................. Table 1.4 Customer Perception Surveys - Percentage of Customers Dissatisfied .................. Table 9.4 Customer Perception Surveys - Sample Sizes ........................................................ Table 9.5 Expenses and Taxes ................................................................................................ Table 11.2 Expenses - Total Operating ..................................................................................... Table 11.9 Factors - Interstate DEM - Unweighted ................................................... Table 8.11 Factors - Interstate DEM - Weighted ...................................................... Table 8.12 General Information .......................................................................... Table 1.17 High-Cost Loop Support - 1999 Data - by Jurisdiction...................................... Table 3.20 High-Cost Loop Support - 1999 Data - by Study Area .......................................Table 3.32 High-Cost Loop Support - Percentage Changes - by Jurisdiction....................... Table 3.21 High-Cost Loop Support - Percentage Changes - by Study Area ........................ Table 3.33 High-Cost Loop Payment Formulas .................................................................. Table 3.2 High-Cost Loop Payment History ......................................................................... Table
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/SOCC/00socc.pdf
  • 0.84 1.62 1.72 3.35 1.04 2.03 0.76 1.48 1.46 2.85 0.86 1.70 0.62 1.23 Sprint 1.88 3.67 1.15 2.23 0.83 1.61 1.71 3.34 1.03 2.02 0.75 1.47 1.45 2.84 0.85 1.68 0.61 1.22 1987AT&T 1.583.080.981.910.741.45 1.50 2.95 0.93 1.83 0.71 1.39 1.23 2.38 0.76 1.48 0.58 1.12 MCI 1.53 3.02 0.96 1.89 0.71 1.42 1.46 2.90 0.90 1.80 0.69 1.37 1.17 2.32 0.71 1.43 0.55 1.09 Sprint 1.54 3.04 0.96 1.89 0.73 1.43 1.37 2.92 0.92 1.81 0.69 1.37 1.19 2.34 0.74 1.45 0.52 1.04 1988AT&T 1.402.750.911.790.701.38 1.34 2.64 0.87 1.72 0.67 1.32 1.11 2.16 0.72 1.40 0.56 1.08 MCI 1.41 2.80 0.94 1.85 0.71 1.41 1.35 2.69 0.88 1.75 0.68 1.35 1.07 2.12 0.69 1.37 0.53 1.06 Sprint 1.44 2.84
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/SOCC/01socc.pdf
  • 5.28 5.32 5.32 Total Monthly Charge for Measured/Message Service $43.44 $43.82 $44.26 $43.72 $43.75 $43.84 $43.57 $43.35 $43.35 $44.45 $44.93 Cost of a Five-Minute Business-Day Same-Zone Call $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.10 $0.09 Basic Connection Charge $72.75 $72.55 $71.41 $69.88 $67.87 $68.47 $68.67 $65.83 $67.87 $67.77 $67.84 Additional Connection Charge for Touch-Tone Service 1.13 1.19 1.17 0.92 0.27 0.17 0.17 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12 Tax 4.32 4.33 4.25 4.13 4.17 4.2 4.45 4.13 4.53 4.4 4.42 Total Connection Charge $78.20 $78.07 $76.83 $74.93 $72.31 $72.85 $73.29 $70.09 $72.55 $72.29 $72.38 Additional Charge if Drop Line and Connection Block Needed $6.90 $6.83 $6.64 $6.49 $7.28 $6.98 $6.54 $6.54 $6.65 $6.62 $6.62 Lowest-Cost Inside Wiring Maintenance Plan $2.05
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/SOCC/02socc.pdf
  • $44.45 $45.57 $46.40 Number of Sample Cities with Measured/Message Service 84 84 87 87 86 85 85 85 85 85 86 Cost of a Five-Minute Same-Zone Business-Day Call $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.10 $0.09 $0.09 Basic Connection Charge $72.55 $71.41 $69.88 $67.87 $68.47 $68.67 $65.83 $67.87 $67.77 $67.04 $67.25 Additional Connection Charge for Touch-Tone Service 1.19 1.17 0.92 0.27 0.17 0.17 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12 Taxes, Including 911 Charges 4.33 4.25 4.13 4.17 4.20 4.45 4.13 4.53 4.40 4.69 4.97 Total Connection Charge $78.07 $76.83 $74.93 $72.31 $72.85 $73.29 $70.09 $72.55 $72.29 $71.86 $72.35 Additional Charge if Drop Line and Connection Block Needed $6.83 $6.64 $6.49 $7.28 $6.98 $6.54 $6.54 $6.65 $6.62 $6.62 $6.63 Lowest-Cost Inside
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/SOCC/03socc.pdf
  • $45.57 $44.61 $44.60 Number of Sample Cities with Measured/Message Service 84 87 87 86 85 85 85 85 85 86 85 Cost of a Five-Minute, Business-Day, Same-Zone Call $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 Basic Connection Charge $71.41 $69.88 $67.87 $68.47 $68.67 $65.83 $67.87 $67.77 $67.04 $67.29 $67.26 Additional Connection Charge for Touch-Tone Service 4 1.17 0.92 0.27 0.17 0.17 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12 4 4 Tax, Including 911 Charges 4.25 4.13 4.17 4.20 4.45 4.13 4.53 4.40 4.69 5.09 5.36 Total Connection Charge $76.83 $74.93 $72.31 $72.85 $73.29 $70.09 $72.55 $72.29 $71.86 $72.39 $72.62 Additional Charge if Drop Line and Connection Block Needed $6.64 $6.49 $7.28 $6.98 $6.54 $6.54 $6.65 $6.62 $6.62 $6.52 $6.52 Lowest-Cost
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/SOCC/95socc.pdf
  • NH NEW JERSEY 539.0 421.0 118.0 73.2 44.8 6.45 4.18 4.57 15.19 29.6 NJ NEW MEXICO 34.3 15.9 18.3 12.7 5.7 0.22 0.43 0.25 0.90 4.8 NM NEW YORK 535.6 197.7 337.9 258.4 79.5 11.09 10.39 3.11 24.59 54.9 NY NORTH CAROLINA 368.9 208.8 160.1 139.6 20.5 2.15 0.72 0.25 3.12 17.4 NC NORTH DAKOTA (1.7) 3.2 (4.9) (4.3) (0.6) (1.17) (0.65) (0.58) (2.40) 1.8 ND OHIO 447.8 203.0 244.9 209.2 35.7 1.11 0.89 0.57 2.58 33.1 OH OKLAHOMA 78.2 55.9 22.3 15.4 6.9 (0.18) (0.05) 0.02 (0.21) 7.1 OK OREGON 55.6 39.0 16.6 14.6 2.0 (3.75) (1.66) (0.90) (6.30) 8.3 OR PENNSYLVANIA 624.4 432.3 192.1 139.8 37.7 6.96 0.65 3.23 10.84 26.9 PA RHODE ISLAND 27.3 7.5 19.8 15.2 4.6
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/SOCC/96socc.pdf
  • 2.05 1.15 2.15 0.85 1.60 0.85 1.60 2.35 4.35 1.70 3.20 1.35 2.60 1969 1.80 3.30 1.35 2.60 1.05 2.05 1.15 2.15 0.85 1.60 0.85 1.60 2.35 4.35 1.70 3.20 1.35 2.60 1970 9/ 1.55 3.05 1.00 2.00 0.80 1.55 1.10 2.10 0.85 1.60 0.80 1.55 2.05 4.05 1.25 2.50 1.05 2.05 1971 10/ 1.60 3.10 1.00 2.00 0.80 1.55 1.17 2.22 0.85 1.60 0.76 1.46 2.05 4.05 1.25 2.50 1.05 2.05 1972 1.60 3.10 1.00 2.00 0.80 1.55 1.17 2.22 0.85 1.60 0.76 1.46 2.05 4.05 1.25 2.50 1.05 2.05 1973 11/ 1.69 3.29 1.00 2.00 0.80 1.55 1.26 2.41 0.85 1.60 0.76 1.46 2.19 4.29 1.25 2.50 1.05 2.05 1974 1.69 3.29 1.00 2.00 0.80 1.55 1.26 2.41 0.85
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/SOCC/97socc.pdf
  • INCLUDE CALLS BETWEEN MEXICO AND THE U.S. MAINLAND, GUAM OR COMMONWEALTH OF NORTHERN MARIANA ISLANDS (CNMI). ** INCLUDING REAL TIME RATED CALLS AND ALL COLLECT CALLS. 235 STATISTICS OF COMMUNICATIONS COMMON CARRIERS TABLE 5.6-AT&T RATES FOR LONG DISTANCE MESSAGE TELECOMMUNICATIONS SERVICE UNITED STATES-OVERSEAS DIAL STATION DIAL STATION COUNTRY STANDARD ECONOMY COUNTRY STANDARD ECONOMY ARGENTINA $2.17 $1.49ITALY $1.69 $1.20 AUSTRALIA 1.70 1.17JAMAICA 1.79 1.47 AUSTRIA 1.62 1.16JAPAN (INCLUDING OKINAWA) 1.63 1.18 BAHAMAS 1.29 1.04KOREA, REPUBLIC OF 2.04 1.43 BELGIUM 1.74 1.11NETHERLANDS 1.48 0.96 BERMUDA 1.40 1.16PAKISTAN 4.64 3.05 BRAZIL 2.07 1.51PANAMA, REPUBLIC OF 1.97 1.51 CHILE 1.96 1.54PERU 2.24 1.57 CHINA, PEOPLE'S REPUBLIC OF 2.92 2.26PHILIPPINES 2.44 1.64 COLOMBIA 2.09 1.53POLAND, REPUBLIC OF 1.77 1.42 COSTA RICA 1.85 1.38PORTUGAL (INCLUDING AZORES 1.85
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/SOCC/98SOCC.PDF
  • SUBJECT TO STATE INTERSTATE COLLECTIONS ADJUSTMENTS SEPARATIONS COMMON TRAFFIC SPECIAL T O T A L AND LINE SENSITIVE INTEREXCHANGE ALL REPORTING COS. $8,316.4 $30.0 $8,264.2$8,000.0 $264.2 $9.7 $18.4 $0.0 $28.1 $236.1 BELL OPERATING COS. 6,729.3 24.4 6,704.9 6,478.5 226.4 9.5 18.0 27.5 199.0 ALL OTHER COS. 1,587.2 5.6 1,559.3 1,521.5 37.8 0.2 0.4 0.0 0.6 37.2 ALABAMA 73.7 73.7 72.5 1.17 1.17 AL ARIZONA 36.4 0.043 36.4 36.1 0.29 0.29 AZ ARKANSAS 100.8 100.8 100.1 0.65 0.65 AR CALIFORNIA 1,502.4 0.027 1,502.4 1,500.7 1.66 1.66 CA COLORADO 116.8 0.004 116.8 116.8 (0.01) (0.01)CO CONNECTICUT 201.1 201.1 191.4 9.67 9.67 CT DELAWARE 25.2 25.2 11.5 13.70 1.7 3.1 4.8 8.90 DE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA 4.0 4.0 0.0 4.02 0.4 0.7 1.1 2.88
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/SOCC/99socc.pdf
  • Delaware 81.3 1.08 80.2 5.1 75.1 28.6 16.0 30.2 74.9 0.239DE District of Columbia 172.1 2.49 169.6 0.6 169.1 60.0 25.9 82.9 168.8 0.328DC Florida 2,420.9 40.33 2,380.5 619.8 1,760.7 1,024.2 360.5 374.2 1,758.9 1.786 FL Georgia 971.5 6.57 964.9 139.3 825.6 420.4 180.3 224.1 824.8 0.815GA Hawaii 166.9 3.64 163.2 31.1 132.1 65.3 37.0 29.7 132.1 HI Idaho 179.4 1.17 178.2 26.7 151.5 79.7 37.6 34.2 151.5 ID Illinois 1,252.0 (15.72) 1,267.7 207.9 1,059.8 506.6 241.7 310.5 1,058.9 0.979 IL Indiana 764.6 (1.15) 765.8 237.8 528.0 273.7 113.5 140.5 527.8 0.191 IN Iowa 326.7 3.20 323.4 86.7 236.7 118.8 51.7 66.2 236.7 IA Kansas 277.3 3.88 273.4 54.0 219.4 98.9 51.9 68.7 219.4 KS Kentucky 465.2 4.71 460.5 127.1 333.5
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/SOCC/prelim02socc.pdf
  • $44.45 $45.57 $46.40 Number of Sample Cities with Measured/Message Service 84 84 87 87 86 85 85 85 85 85 86 Cost of a Five-Minute Same-Zone Business-Day Call $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.10 $0.09 $0.09 Basic Connection Charge $72.55 $71.41 $69.88 $67.87 $68.47 $68.67 $65.83 $67.87 $67.77 $67.04 $67.25 Additional Connection Charge for Touch-Tone Service 1.19 1.17 0.92 0.27 0.17 0.17 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12 Taxes, Including 911 Charges 4.33 4.25 4.13 4.17 4.20 4.45 4.13 4.53 4.40 4.69 4.97 Total Connection Charge $78.07 $76.83 $74.93 $72.31 $72.85 $73.29 $70.09 $72.55 $72.29 $71.86 $72.35 Additional Charge if Drop Line and Connection Block Needed $6.83 $6.64 $6.49 $7.28 $6.98 $6.54 $6.54 $6.65 $6.62 $6.62 $6.63 Lowest-Cost Inside
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Enforcement/News_Releases/2001/nren0124.html http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Enforcement/News_Releases/2001/nren0124.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Enforcement/News_Releases/2001/nren0124.txt
  • Commission. The Commission also found that SBC's loop qualification system, as it operated when the Commission approved the Kansas/Oklahoma application, did not violate section 271 of the Communications Act. Based on its investigation, however, the Commission did find that SBC appears to be liable for other apparent violations. Specifically, the Commission found that: 1. SBC appears to have violated section 1.17 of the Commission's Rules by intentionally misrepresenting information to the Enforcement Bureau during the investigation. The Commission proposed a fine of $120,000 for this apparent violation. 2. SBC appears to have violated section 1.65 of the Commission's Rules when it failed to notify the Commission in a timely manner that the information in the affidavits was inaccurate. For this, the
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Enforcement/Orders/2000/da000418.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Enforcement/Orders/2000/da000418.txt
  • available to the public or transient users of its premises, for interstate telephone calls using a provider of operator services.''). 47 U.S.C. § 226(c). 47 U.S.C. § 226(b). Second Amended Complaint at ¶¶ 18-22. Id. at ¶¶ 22, 25-26. 47 U.S.C. § 201(b). Second Amended Complaint at ¶¶ 27-28. Id. at ¶¶ 29-31. Complainants allege that PetroCom therefore violated section 1.17 of the Commission's rules, which requires truthful statements before the Commission. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.17. See 47 U.S.C. § 208; see also Directel, Inc. v. American Tel. & Tel. Co., Memorandum Opinion and Order, 11 FCC Rcd 7554, 7560 (1996); Amendment of Rules Governing Procedures To Be Followed When Formal Complaints Are Filed Against Common Carriers, Report and Order,
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Enforcement/Orders/2001/fcc01308.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Enforcement/Orders/2001/fcc01308.txt
  • section 1.65 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.65; (2) apparently making a misrepresentation or a willful material omission bearing on a matter within the jurisdiction of the Commission in a written statement submitted by SBC in connection with the investigation into the filing of the incorrect affidavits in the Kansas/Oklahoma section 271 proceeding, in apparent violation of section 1.17 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.17; and (3) apparently failing to comply with the terms of a consent decree that resolved an earlier investigation of SBC involving analogous issues and required SBC to train certain employees on Commission rules relating to contacts with the agency.2 3. Based on these findings, we find SBC apparently liable for a forfeiture
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Orders/1997/fcc97303.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Orders/1997/fcc97303.txt http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Orders/1997/fcc97303.wp
  • An exhaustive record of all possible exposure locations is not necessary, but, for example, the "worst case" exposure value in an accessible area could be mentioned as showing that no exposures would ever be greater than that level. Reference should be given to the actual FCC exposure limit or limits relevant for the particular transmitting site. 206See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.17 and 1.52. 62 Federal Communications Commission FCC 97-303 (3) An explanation as to what, if any, restrictions on access to certain areas will be maintained to ensure compliance with the public or occupational exposure limits. This includes control procedures that are established for workers who may be exposed as a result of maintenance or other tasks related to their jobs.
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Orders/2000/fcc00233.doc
  • to begin operations as it expects. IUSG provides an analysis of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, and the Commission's Rules to support its assertion that we have the authority to implement IUSG's request. According to IUSG, sections 4(i), 303(n), 308(b), and 403 of the Communications Act empower us to conduct investigations in areas under our jurisdiction. Under Section 1.17 of our rules, we may require in writing from any applicant, permittee or licensee "written statements of fact relevant to . . . matter[s] within the jurisdiction of the Commission." Finally, IUSG contends that we have full power and authority "to obtain the information necessary to discharge [the Commission's] proper functions. . . ." 117. We deny the petition because
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/International/Orders/1999/fcc99167.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/International/Orders/1999/fcc99167.txt http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/International/Orders/1999/fcc99167.wp
  • that collocation rights will be granted to individual parties only for the purpose of servicing their own capacity. This could prevent non-landing parties from achieving economies of scale as backhaul providers.16 JUS responds that these claims are inconsistent with Global Crossing's own experience in successfully constructing a terrestrial fiber optic network in Japan to provide backhaul for its transpacific cable, PC-1.17 JUS also asserts that any owner can choose to terminate its capacity at any of the three independently owned landing stations in Japan; any owner has the right to collocate equipment in those landing stations "at rates that reflect a cost- recovery basis"; and any owner can self-provide backhaul or obtain backhaul from a third party.18 13 See Global Crossing
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Notices/1998/fcc98057.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Notices/1998/fcc98057.wp
  • any expenses for services rendered by any of its principals and that there are no consulting or future employment agreements between the permittee and the assignee that are part of the consideration for assignment of the permit to the proposed assignee. The Commission would continue to have the authority to Federal Communications Commission FCC 98-57 50 See 47 C.F.R. § 1.17 ("The Commission or its representatives may, in writing, require from any applicant, permittee or licensee written statements of fact relevant to a determination whether an application should be granted or denied, or to a determination of whether a license should be revoked, or to some other matter within the jurisdiction of the Commission."). 51 47 C.F.R. § 73.3613(b). 52 We
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Orders/1998/fcc98281.pdf
  • without considering specific antenna information such as make, model, and size. Elimination of the requirement to file this information would provide applicants maximum flexibility in choosing an antenna manufacturer when constructing a facility. Should the absence of definitive information concerning a specific directional antenna preclude grant of a construction permit Federal Communications Commission FCC 98-281 97 See 47 C.F.R. § 1.17 (the Commission or its representatives may require from any applicant, permittee or licensee written statements of fact relevant to a determination whether an application should be granted). 98 See, e.g., Comments of NAB at 13; Cohen, Dippell and Everist, P.C. at 3; CBS at 5; Independent Broadcast Consultants, Inc. at 22. 99 See Comments of NAB at 13. 100 See,
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Orders/2000/da001174.doc
  • segment, the amount of commercial matter contained therein, and an explanation of why the limits were exceeded." We note, moreover, that Section 73.3514 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 73.3514, provides that "[e]ach application shall include all information called for by the particular form on which the application is required to be filed . . . .[,]" and Section 1.17 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.17, provides that "[n]o licensee, permittee or applicant shall . . . in any application . . . submitted to the Commission, make any material misrepresentation or willful material omission bearing on any matter within the jurisdiction of the Commission." Therefore, failure to provide the information called for in the renewal application, or
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/OPP/working_papers/oppwp34.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/OPP/working_papers/oppwp34.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/OPP/working_papers/oppwp34.txt
  • four incremental links be assigned? Suppose each network were assigned a share proportional to its number of subscribers. The X network would pay for two-thirds of the four incremental links (2.67 links), and would have a new average of (6.67)/4= 1.67 links per subscriber. The O network would be responsible for 1.33 additional links, raising its average to 2.33/2 = 1.17 links per subscriber. However, a subscriber to either network receives precisely the same benefits: non-blocking access to the same subscriber list. Therefore, subscribers to the X network would be better off if they switched to the O network. As the O network grew, its links per subscriber would increase (and losing subscribers would reduce links per subscriber on the X
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Orders/1999/da992812.doc
  • be set aside by the Commission entity that took the action, on its own motion, and within 30 days). Thus, the request for set aside may not be considered at this time. 47 U.S.C. § 312(a)(2). See Reply to Opposition at 4 n.14. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.106(f). See KR&G Request at 2-4. See Opposition at 2. 47 C.F.R. § 1.17. See New Ulm Telecom, Inc., Memorandum Opinion and Order, 10 FCC Rcd. 2705, 2706 ¶ 9 (CCB 1995). 47 C.F.R. § 1.917(a) (formerly 47 C.F.R. § 1.913(a)). See Opposition, Ex. B (Partnership Agreement of CJW Transportation Specialist) See KR&G request at 5. 47 C.F.R. § 90.617(c) (Business Category) (citing 47 C.F.R. § 90.35(a)(1) (Industrial/Business Radio Pool)). See 47 C.F.R. §
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Orders/2000/da000319.doc
  • 1993, the date of our Sunshine Notice on the Report and Order [PCP Exclusivity Order], as the cutoff date for slow growth eligibility, and to deny slow growth extensions to grandfathered licensees generally. . . . We believe that the date for dividing `old' from `new' applicants also is the appropriate date for triggering slow growth eligibility.'') 47 C.F.R. § 1.17. Federal Communications Commission DA 00-319 " ¬ öîßöÐŶÐö²öî"¥îöî¥î²î²Ÿ²¥-‹¥-¥‹¥‹¥‹¥‹¥‹¥‹¥„¥‹¥‹¥‹¥‹¥ é 0 0
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Orders/2000/fcc00055.doc
  • N. Koplin, Hinsdale Management Corporation, to concerned parties (March 13, 1996). Gencom, Inc. v. FCC, 832 F.2d 171, 181 (D.C. Cir. 1987). Application of Wine Country Radio, 11 FCC Rcd 2333, 2334 ¶6 (1996) (citing Johnson v. United States, 628 F.2d 187 (D.C. Cir. 1980)). Application at 7. 47 C.F.R. § 1.16. 47 C.F.R. § 1.52. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.17. Swan Creek Communications v. FCC, 39 F.3d 1217, 1222 (D.C. Cir. 1994). See 18 U.S.C. § 1001. Quatron Opposition at 6-7; O'Hare Opposition at 6-7. 47 C.F.R. § 90.157(a) (emphasis added). 47 C.F.R. 90.157(a). Federal Communications Commission FCC 00-55 Federal Communications Commission FCC 00-55 ß à ) 9 W Ü ö b a b c
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Orders/2001/da012482.pdf
  • transaction under Section 310(b)(4). We strongly caution the Applicants, and all parties seeking relief under Section 310(b)(4), to ensure that their filings include comprehensive and detailed information concerning the above-described types of voting and equity interests held by non-U.S. interest holders. Indeed, we are concerned that the Applicants may have violated one or more of the Commission's rules, including section 1.17. Accordingly, we are referring this matter to the Enforcement nature of such requests, we urge applicants not to rely on questions contained in information requests from other proceedings. Applicants who may wish further guidance should seek clarification of the requirements of Section 310(b)(4) as applied to the particular facts of their proposed transaction. 25 See Rules and Policies on Foreign
• http://www.fcc.gov/Daily_Releases/Daily_Digest/2002/dd020222.html
  • [56]DA-02-368A1.doc [57]DA-02-368A1.pdf [58]DA-02-368A1.txt REVIEW OF THE COMMISSION'S BROADCAST AND CABLE EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY RULES AND POLICIES. Granted, in part, motion for procedural Relief and extended comment and reply comment deadlines. (Dkt No. 98-204). Action by: Chief, Mass Media Bureau. Comments Due: 04/15/2002. Reply Comments Due: 05/15/2002. Adopted: 02/20/2002 by ORDER. (DA No. 02-400). MMB [59]DA-02-400A1.doc [60]DA-02-400A1.pdf [61]DA-02-400A1.txt AMENDMENT OF SECTION 1.17 OF THE COMMISSION'S RULES CONCERNING TRUTHFUL STATEMENTS TO THE COMMISSION.. Comments and Reply Comment dates 30 and 45 days respectively after publication in the Federal Register. (Dkt No. 02-37). Action by: The Commission. Comments Due: 04/08/2002. Reply Comments Due: 04/22/2002. Adopted: 02/14/2002 by NPRM. (FCC No. 02-54). OGC [62]FCC-02-54A1.doc [63]FCC-02-54A1.pdf [64]FCC-02-54A1.txt ALEE CELLULAR COMMUNICATIONS (MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER, HEARING DESIGNATION
• http://www.fcc.gov/Daily_Releases/Daily_Digest/2002/dd020312.html
  • for willfully violating Section 1.89(b) of the Commission's Rules for failure to respond to Commission Correspondence.. Action by: Chief, Enforcement. Adopted: 03/08/2002 by Forfeiture Order. (DA No. 02-574). EB [25]DA-02-574A1.doc [26]DA-02-574A1.pdf [27]DA-02-574A1.txt NORTHEAST UTILITIES/LICENSEE OF VARIOUS LAND MOBILE AND MICROWAVE LICENSES. Issued a monetary forfeiture in the amount of $5,500 against Northeast Utilities for having willfully and repeatedly violation Section 1.17 of the Commission's rules for failure to properly disclose that it had been convicted of felonies in three applicat. Action by: Chief, Enforcement Bureau. Adopted: 03/11/2002 by Forfeiture Order. (DA No. 02-336). EB [28]DA-02-336A1.doc [29]DA-02-336A1.pdf [30]DA-02-336A1.txt ADDENDA: THE FOLLOWING ITEMS, RELEASED MARCH 11, 2002, DID NOT APPEAR IN DIGEST NO. 47: ----------------------------------------------------------------------- --- PUBLIC NOTICES ----------------------------------------------------------------------- --- Released: 03/11/2002. COMMISSION
• http://www.fcc.gov/Daily_Releases/Daily_Digest/2002/dd020410.html
  • TELEVISION STATIONS KVEA(TV), CORONA, CALIFORNIA K47GD, SAN LUIS OBISPO, CALIFORNIA. Denied Hispanic Groups' and Paxson's petitions, granted in part and denied in part Paxson's request for declaratory ruling, admonished NBC and Paxson for their actions, granted NBC's request. Action by: The Commission. Adopted: 04/09/2002 by MO&O. (FCC No. 02-113). MB [71]FCC-02-113A1.doc [72]FCC-02-113A1.pdf [73]FCC-02-113A1.txt IN THE MATTER OF AMENDMENT OF SECTION 1.17 OF THE COMMISSION'S RULES CONCERNING TRUTHFUL STATEMENTS TO THE COMMISSION.. Granted the Federal Communications Bar Associations extension of time. (Dkt No. 02-37). Action by: Administrative Law Division. Comments Due: 04/22/2002. Reply Comments Due: 05/07/2002. Adopted: 04/10/2002 by ORDER. (DA No. 02-802). OGC [74]DA-02-802A1.doc [75]DA-02-802A1.pdf [76]DA-02-802A1.txt AMENDMENT OF PARTS 0 AND 68 OF THE COMMISSION'S RULES TO REFLECT THE COMMISSION'S RECENT
• http://www.fcc.gov/Daily_Releases/Daily_Digest/2003/dd030310.html
  • RULES TO IMPLEMENT DECISIONS FROM WORLD RADIOCOMMUNICATION CONFERENCES CONCERNING FREQUENCY BANDS BELOW 28000 KHZ. Issued erratum correcting Report and Order, FCC 03-39, released March 3, 2003, in the text of the document, and also Appendix B. (Dkt No. 02-16). Action by: Chief, Office of Engineering and Technology by ERRATUM. OET [102]DOC-231902A1.doc [103]DOC-231902A1.pdf [104]DOC-231902A1.txt IN THE MATTER OF AMENDMENT OF SECTION 1.17 OF THE COMMISSION'S RULES CONCERNING TRUTHFUL STATEMENTS TO THE COMMISSION. Amended rules to specify the requirements for the submission of truthful statements of the Commission. (Dkt No. 02-37). Action by: the Commission. Adopted: 03/04/2003 by R&O. (FCC No. 03-45). OGC [105]FCC-03-45A1.doc [106]FCC-03-45A1.pdf [107]FCC-03-45A1.txt CASTILLO COMMUNICATIONS FOR PRIVATE LAND MOBILE RADIO STATIONS. Denied the Petitions to Deny (Informal Requests) filed by
• http://www.fcc.gov/Daily_Releases/Daily_Digest/2003/dd031110.html
  • studio. Action by: Chief, Enforcement Bureau. Adopted: 11/06/2003 by Forfeiture Order. (DA No. 03-3564). EB [73]DA-03-3564A1.doc [74]DA-03-3564A1.pdf [75]DA-03-3564A1.txt APPLICATIONS FOR STATION WKVE(FM), SEMORA, NORTH CAROLINA. Affirmed prior staff actions, and granted pending application for license, assignment, and noncommercial status. Issued a Notice of Apparent Liability to Southern for its submission of two letters with altered dates in violation of Section 1.17 of the Rul. Action by: the Commission. Adopted: 10/30/2003 by MO&O. (FCC No. 03-268). MB [76]FCC-03-268A1.doc [77]FCC-03-268A1.pdf [78]FCC-03-268A1.txt AMENDMENT OF SECTION 2.106 OF THE COMMISSION'S RULES TO ALLOCATE SPECTRUM AT 2 GHZ FOR USE BY THE MOBILE-SATELLITE SERVICE. Modified the rules that new 2 GHz Mobile-Satellite Service (MSS) licensees are to follow when relocating incumbent Broadcast Auxiliary Service (BAS) licensees
• http://www.fcc.gov/Daily_Releases/Daily_Digest/2004/dd040323.html
  • J. TOLCHIN ON REQUEST FOR INSPECTION OF RECORDS. Denied the Application for Review. Action by: the Commission. Adopted: 03/17/2004 by MO&O. (FCC No. 04-63). OGC [33]FCC-04-63A1.doc [34]FCC-04-63A1.pdf [35]FCC-04-63A1.txt GEORGE J. ZARDECKI ON REQUEST FOR INSPECTION OF RECORDS. Denied the Application for Review. Action by: the Commission. Adopted: 03/17/2004 by MO&O. (FCC No. 04-64). OGC [36]FCC-04-64A1.doc [37]FCC-04-64A1.pdf [38]FCC-04-64A1.txt AMENDMENT OF SECTION 1.17 OF THE COMMISSION'S RULES CONCERNING TRUTHFUL STATEMENTS TO THE COMMISSION. Denied the Petition for Reconsideration. (Dkt No. 02-37). Action by: the Commission. Adopted: 03/17/2004 by MO&O. (FCC No. 04-65). OGC [39]FCC-04-65A1.doc [40]FCC-04-65A1.pdf [41]FCC-04-65A1.txt ADDENDA: THE FOLLOWING ITEMS, RELEASED MARCH 22, 2004, DID NOT APPEAR IN DIGEST NO. 55: ----------------------------------------------------------------------- --- PUBLIC NOTICES ----------------------------------------------------------------------- --- Released: 03/22/2004. DOMESTIC 214 APPLICATION FILED
• http://www.fcc.gov/Daily_Releases/Daily_Digest/2004/dd041130.html
  • by: Chief, Video Division, Media Bureau. Adopted: 11/16/2004 by R&O. (DA No. 04-3622). MB [260]DA-04-3622A1.doc [261]DA-04-3622A1.pdf [262]DA-04-3622A1.txt SMALL ENTITY COMPLIANCE GUIDE: EXTENDING WIRELESS TELECOMMUNICATIONS SERVICES TO TRIBAL LANDS. Prepared Small Entity Compliance Guide detailing Tribal Lands bidding procedures. (Dkt No. 99-266) by Compliance guide. (DA No. 04-3713). OCBO. Contact Allan Manuel at (202) 418-1164 [263]DA-04-3713A1.doc [264]DA-04-3713A1.pdf [265]DA-04-3713A1.txt AMENDMENT OF SECTION 1.17 OF THE COMMSSION'S RULES CONCERNING TRUTHFUL STATEMENTS TO THE COMMISSION. Denied the petition for Limited Further Reconsideration. (Dkt No. 02-37). Action by: The Commission. Adopted: 11/23/2004 by MO&O. (FCC No. 04-276). OGC [266]FCC-04-276A1.doc [267]FCC-04-276A1.pdf [268]FCC-04-276A1.txt ADDENDA: THE FOLLOWING ITEMS, RELEASED NOVEMBER 29, 2004, DID NOT APPEAR IN DIGEST NO. 225: ----------------------------------------------------------------------- --- SPEECHES ----------------------------------------------------------------------- --- REMARKS OF FCC COMMISSIONER JONATHAN
• http://www.fcc.gov/Daily_Releases/Daily_Digest/2006/dd061020.html
  • ACT. (DA No. 06-2083). (Dkt No 06-194). Comments Due: 11/20/2006. Reply Comments Due: 12/05/2006. WCB [57]DA-06-2083A1.doc [58]DA-06-2083A1.pdf [59]DA-06-2083A1.txt Report No: CWS-07-05 Released: 10/20/2006. ANTENNA STRUCTURE REGISTRATION SERVICE INFORMATION. WTB [60]DOC-267991A1.pdf [61]DOC-267991A1.txt Report No: CWS-07-06 Released: 10/20/2006. ANTENNA STRUCTURE REGISTRATION SERVICE INFORMATION. WTB [62]DOC-267992A1.pdf [63]DOC-267992A1.txt ----------------------------------------------------------------------- --- TEXTS ----------------------------------------------------------------------- --- C5 COMMUNICATIONS, LLC. Found C5 Communications LLC, in violation of Section 1.17 of the FCC rules by twice using a false name to certify the accuracy of certain matters to the Commission in an application for Special Temporary Authority (STA). Action by: Chief, Investigations and Hearing Division, Enforcement Bureau. Adopted: 10/19/2006 by NALF. (DA No. 06-2077). EB [64]DA-06-2077A1.pdf [65]DA-06-2077A1.txt TIDEWATER COMMUNICATIONS LLC. Issued a monetary forfeiture in the amount of $10,000 to
• http://www.fcc.gov/Daily_Releases/Daily_Digest/2007/dd071120.html
  • Stations and operating those Stations. Action by: Chief, Investigations and Hearings Division, Enforcement Bureau. Adopted: 11/19/2007 by Forfeiture Order. (DA No. 07-4678). EB [27]DA-07-4678A1.doc [28]DA-07-4678A1.pdf [29]DA-07-4678A1.txt C5 COMMUNICATIONS, LLC. Imposed a forfeiture of $17,500 for C5 Communications, LLC, ("C5 Communications" or the "Company"), Applicant for Special Temporary Authority to Operate a 1.0 meter Ku-Band Earth Station, for violations of Section 1.17 of the Commission's rules. Action by: Chief, Investigations and Hearings Division, Enforcement Bureau. Adopted: 11/19/2007 by Forfeiture Order. (DA No. 07-4679). EB [30]DA-07-4679A1.doc [31]DA-07-4679A1.pdf [32]DA-07-4679A1.txt BLUE CHIP BROADCASTING LICENSES, LTD.. Granted the application for renewal of license for Station WJMO(AM), Cleveland, Ohio. Action by: Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau by LETTER. (DA No. 07-4683). MB [33]DA-07-4683A1.doc [34]DA-07-4683A1.pdf [35]DA-07-4683A1.txt CITY OF
• http://www.fcc.gov/Daily_Releases/Daily_Digest/2007/dd071207.html
  • am. PSHSB [14]DA-07-4919A1.doc [15]DA-07-4919A1.pdf [16]DA-07-4919A1.txt Released: 12/07/2007. TARIFF TRANSMITTAL PUBLIC REFERENCE LOG. WCB. Contact: (202) 418-0270 [17]DOC-278768A1.pdf [18]DOC-278768A1.txt Report No: CWS-08-16 Released: 12/07/2007. ANTENNA STRUCTURE REGISTRATION SERVICE INFORMATION. WTB [19]DOC-278764A1.pdf [20]DOC-278764A1.txt ----------------------------------------------------------------------- --- TEXTS ----------------------------------------------------------------------- --- BP EXPLORATION (ALASKA), INC. Adopted a Consent Decree terminating an investigation by the Enforcement Bureau into compliance by BP Exploration (Alaska), Inc. with Section 1.17 of the Commission's Rules. Action by: Chief, Enforcement Bureau. Adopted: 12/06/2007 by ORDER. (DA No. 07-4876). EB [21]DA-07-4876A1.doc [22]DA-07-4876A1.pdf [23]DA-07-4876A2.pdf [24]DA-07-4876A1.txt [25]DA-07-4876A2.txt MOUNTAIN CHRISTIAN FELLOWSHIP. Issued a $250 Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture for Low Power FM Station KMSJ-LP, Mt. Shasta, California for failure to timely file renewal application. Granted the application for renewal. by MO&O. Action by: Chief,
• http://www.fcc.gov/Daily_Releases/Daily_Digest/2010/dd101015.html
  • Shock". (Dkt No. 09-158 10-207 ). Action by: The Commission. Adopted: 10/14/2010 by NPRM. (FCC No. 10-180). CGB [96]FCC-10-180A1.doc [97]FCC-10-180A2.doc [98]FCC-10-180A3.doc [99]FCC-10-180A4.doc [100]FCC-10-180A5.doc [101]FCC-10-180A6.doc [102]FCC-10-180A1.pdf [103]FCC-10-180A2.pdf [104]FCC-10-180A3.pdf [105]FCC-10-180A4.pdf [106]FCC-10-180A5.pdf [107]FCC-10-180A6.pdf [108]FCC-10-180A1.txt [109]FCC-10-180A2.txt [110]FCC-10-180A3.txt [111]FCC-10-180A4.txt [112]FCC-10-180A5.txt [113]FCC-10-180A6.txt PHONEJAMMER.COM. Issued Citation to Phonejammer.com for providing incorrect, material factual information to the Spectrum Enforcement Division of the Enforcement Bureau in violation of section 1.17(a)(2) of the Commission's rules. Action by: Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau. Adopted: 10/14/2010 by LETTER. (DA No. 10-1975). EB [114]DA-10-1975A1.doc [115]DA-10-1975A1.pdf [116]DA-10-1975A1.txt VISIONTEK PRODUCTS, LLC. Adopted a Consent Decree in this proceeding. Action by: Chief, Enforcement Bureau. Adopted: 10/14/2010 by Order/Consent Decree. (DA No. 10-1961). EB [117]DA-10-1961A1.doc [118]DA-10-1961A1.pdf [119]DA-10-1961A1.txt PUERTO RICO TELEPHONE COMPANY, INC. AND AMERICA MOVIL., S.A.B. DE
• http://www.fcc.gov/DiversityFAC/092209/constitutional-sub-rec-fullfile.pdf
  • program periodically to ensure its continued integrity and effectiveness. 11 This process is similar to the audit program currently used to monitor EEO compliance. See Review of the Commission's Broadcast and Cable Equal Employment Opportunity Rules and Policies, Second Report & Order and Third Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, 17 FCC Rcd 24018, 24066-67 ¶¶155-156 (2002). 12 See 47 C.F.R. § 1.17 (requiring truthful and accurate statements to the Commission).
• http://www.fcc.gov/DiversityFAC/adopted-recommendations/constitutional-sub-rec-fullfile.pdf
  • program periodically to ensure its continued integrity and effectiveness. 11 This process is similar to the audit program currently used to monitor EEO compliance. See Review of the Commission's Broadcast and Cable Equal Employment Opportunity Rules and Policies, Second Report & Order and Third Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, 17 FCC Rcd 24018, 24066-67 ¶¶155-156 (2002). 12 See 47 C.F.R. § 1.17 (requiring truthful and accurate statements to the Commission).
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/fcc2003budget.html?page=10
  • to Congress as required by the Orbit Act [_] Satellite Competition Reports [_] Section 257 Triennial Reports [_] Section 43.61 International Traffic Data Reports [_] Statistics of Communications Common Carrier Reports [_] Telephone Penetration Reports [_] Telephone Subscribership Reports [_] Trends in Telephony Service [_] Video Competition Reports Apply Filter * [79]Numbering Resource Utilization in the U.S. (As of 12/31/05) 01.17.2007 This is the Federal Communications Commissions report on numbering resource utilization in... * [80]Local Telephone Competition (As of 06/30/06) 01.07.2007 We present here summary statistics of the latest data on local telephone service competition in... * [81]Report on Cable Industry Prices (2005) 12.27.2006 Section 623(k) of the Communications Act, as amended by the Cable Television Consumer ... * [82]Commercial Mobile
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/fcc2003budget.html?page=10&contrast=
  • to Congress as required by the Orbit Act [_] Satellite Competition Reports [_] Section 257 Triennial Reports [_] Section 43.61 International Traffic Data Reports [_] Statistics of Communications Common Carrier Reports [_] Telephone Penetration Reports [_] Telephone Subscribership Reports [_] Trends in Telephony Service [_] Video Competition Reports Apply Filter * [79]Numbering Resource Utilization in the U.S. (As of 12/31/05) 01.17.2007 This is the Federal Communications Commissions report on numbering resource utilization in... * [80]Local Telephone Competition (As of 06/30/06) 01.07.2007 We present here summary statistics of the latest data on local telephone service competition in... * [81]Report on Cable Industry Prices (2005) 12.27.2006 Section 623(k) of the Communications Act, as amended by the Cable Television Consumer ... * [82]Commercial Mobile
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/fcc2003budget.html?page=10&contrast=highContrast
  • to Congress as required by the Orbit Act [_] Satellite Competition Reports [_] Section 257 Triennial Reports [_] Section 43.61 International Traffic Data Reports [_] Statistics of Communications Common Carrier Reports [_] Telephone Penetration Reports [_] Telephone Subscribership Reports [_] Trends in Telephony Service [_] Video Competition Reports Apply Filter * [79]Numbering Resource Utilization in the U.S. (As of 12/31/05) 01.17.2007 This is the Federal Communications Commissions report on numbering resource utilization in... * [80]Local Telephone Competition (As of 06/30/06) 01.07.2007 We present here summary statistics of the latest data on local telephone service competition in... * [81]Report on Cable Industry Prices (2005) 12.27.2006 Section 623(k) of the Communications Act, as amended by the Cable Television Consumer ... * [82]Commercial Mobile
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/fcc2003budget.html?page=10&fontsize=
  • to Congress as required by the Orbit Act [_] Satellite Competition Reports [_] Section 257 Triennial Reports [_] Section 43.61 International Traffic Data Reports [_] Statistics of Communications Common Carrier Reports [_] Telephone Penetration Reports [_] Telephone Subscribership Reports [_] Trends in Telephony Service [_] Video Competition Reports Apply Filter * [79]Numbering Resource Utilization in the U.S. (As of 12/31/05) 01.17.2007 This is the Federal Communications Commissions report on numbering resource utilization in... * [80]Local Telephone Competition (As of 06/30/06) 01.07.2007 We present here summary statistics of the latest data on local telephone service competition in... * [81]Report on Cable Industry Prices (2005) 12.27.2006 Section 623(k) of the Communications Act, as amended by the Cable Television Consumer ... * [82]Commercial Mobile
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/fcc2003budget.html?page=10&fontsize=largeFont
  • to Congress as required by the Orbit Act [_] Satellite Competition Reports [_] Section 257 Triennial Reports [_] Section 43.61 International Traffic Data Reports [_] Statistics of Communications Common Carrier Reports [_] Telephone Penetration Reports [_] Telephone Subscribership Reports [_] Trends in Telephony Service [_] Video Competition Reports Apply Filter * [79]Numbering Resource Utilization in the U.S. (As of 12/31/05) 01.17.2007 This is the Federal Communications Commissions report on numbering resource utilization in... * [80]Local Telephone Competition (As of 06/30/06) 01.07.2007 We present here summary statistics of the latest data on local telephone service competition in... * [81]Report on Cable Industry Prices (2005) 12.27.2006 Section 623(k) of the Communications Act, as amended by the Cable Television Consumer ... * [82]Commercial Mobile
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/fcc2003budget.html?page=10&fontsize=mediumFont
  • to Congress as required by the Orbit Act [_] Satellite Competition Reports [_] Section 257 Triennial Reports [_] Section 43.61 International Traffic Data Reports [_] Statistics of Communications Common Carrier Reports [_] Telephone Penetration Reports [_] Telephone Subscribership Reports [_] Trends in Telephony Service [_] Video Competition Reports Apply Filter * [79]Numbering Resource Utilization in the U.S. (As of 12/31/05) 01.17.2007 This is the Federal Communications Commissions report on numbering resource utilization in... * [80]Local Telephone Competition (As of 06/30/06) 01.07.2007 We present here summary statistics of the latest data on local telephone service competition in... * [81]Report on Cable Industry Prices (2005) 12.27.2006 Section 623(k) of the Communications Act, as amended by the Cable Television Consumer ... * [82]Commercial Mobile
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/fcc2003budget.html?page=18
  • 43.61 International Traffic Data Reports [_] Statistics of Communications Common Carrier Reports [_] Telephone Penetration Reports [_] Telephone Subscribership Reports [_] Trends in Telephony Service [_] Video Competition Reports Apply Filter * [79]Telephone Subscribership Report (through July 2002) 02.12.2003 This is the Federal Communications Commissions (FCCs) report on telephone subscribership in... * [80]Quarterly Inquiries and Complaints Report (1st Qtr, 2003) 01.17.2003 This report tracks the top subject areas for consumer inquiries and complaints received during the... * [81]Quality of Service Report of the Local Operating Companies (2000-2001) 01.03.2003 This report summarizes various kinds of service quality data filed by certain incumbent local... * [82]9th Annual Video Competition Report 12.31.2002 This is the Commissions ninth annual report (2002 Report) to Congress on
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/fcc2003budget.html?page=18&contrast=
  • 43.61 International Traffic Data Reports [_] Statistics of Communications Common Carrier Reports [_] Telephone Penetration Reports [_] Telephone Subscribership Reports [_] Trends in Telephony Service [_] Video Competition Reports Apply Filter * [79]Telephone Subscribership Report (through July 2002) 02.12.2003 This is the Federal Communications Commissions (FCCs) report on telephone subscribership in... * [80]Quarterly Inquiries and Complaints Report (1st Qtr, 2003) 01.17.2003 This report tracks the top subject areas for consumer inquiries and complaints received during the... * [81]Quality of Service Report of the Local Operating Companies (2000-2001) 01.03.2003 This report summarizes various kinds of service quality data filed by certain incumbent local... * [82]9th Annual Video Competition Report 12.31.2002 This is the Commissions ninth annual report (2002 Report) to Congress on
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/fcc2003budget.html?page=18&contrast=highContrast
  • 43.61 International Traffic Data Reports [_] Statistics of Communications Common Carrier Reports [_] Telephone Penetration Reports [_] Telephone Subscribership Reports [_] Trends in Telephony Service [_] Video Competition Reports Apply Filter * [79]Telephone Subscribership Report (through July 2002) 02.12.2003 This is the Federal Communications Commissions (FCCs) report on telephone subscribership in... * [80]Quarterly Inquiries and Complaints Report (1st Qtr, 2003) 01.17.2003 This report tracks the top subject areas for consumer inquiries and complaints received during the... * [81]Quality of Service Report of the Local Operating Companies (2000-2001) 01.03.2003 This report summarizes various kinds of service quality data filed by certain incumbent local... * [82]9th Annual Video Competition Report 12.31.2002 This is the Commissions ninth annual report (2002 Report) to Congress on
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/fcc2003budget.html?page=18&fontsize=
  • 43.61 International Traffic Data Reports [_] Statistics of Communications Common Carrier Reports [_] Telephone Penetration Reports [_] Telephone Subscribership Reports [_] Trends in Telephony Service [_] Video Competition Reports Apply Filter * [79]Telephone Subscribership Report (through July 2002) 02.12.2003 This is the Federal Communications Commissions (FCCs) report on telephone subscribership in... * [80]Quarterly Inquiries and Complaints Report (1st Qtr, 2003) 01.17.2003 This report tracks the top subject areas for consumer inquiries and complaints received during the... * [81]Quality of Service Report of the Local Operating Companies (2000-2001) 01.03.2003 This report summarizes various kinds of service quality data filed by certain incumbent local... * [82]9th Annual Video Competition Report 12.31.2002 This is the Commissions ninth annual report (2002 Report) to Congress on
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/fcc2003budget.html?page=18&fontsize=largeFont
  • 43.61 International Traffic Data Reports [_] Statistics of Communications Common Carrier Reports [_] Telephone Penetration Reports [_] Telephone Subscribership Reports [_] Trends in Telephony Service [_] Video Competition Reports Apply Filter * [79]Telephone Subscribership Report (through July 2002) 02.12.2003 This is the Federal Communications Commissions (FCCs) report on telephone subscribership in... * [80]Quarterly Inquiries and Complaints Report (1st Qtr, 2003) 01.17.2003 This report tracks the top subject areas for consumer inquiries and complaints received during the... * [81]Quality of Service Report of the Local Operating Companies (2000-2001) 01.03.2003 This report summarizes various kinds of service quality data filed by certain incumbent local... * [82]9th Annual Video Competition Report 12.31.2002 This is the Commissions ninth annual report (2002 Report) to Congress on
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/fcc2003budget.html?page=18&fontsize=mediumFont
  • 43.61 International Traffic Data Reports [_] Statistics of Communications Common Carrier Reports [_] Telephone Penetration Reports [_] Telephone Subscribership Reports [_] Trends in Telephony Service [_] Video Competition Reports Apply Filter * [79]Telephone Subscribership Report (through July 2002) 02.12.2003 This is the Federal Communications Commissions (FCCs) report on telephone subscribership in... * [80]Quarterly Inquiries and Complaints Report (1st Qtr, 2003) 01.17.2003 This report tracks the top subject areas for consumer inquiries and complaints received during the... * [81]Quality of Service Report of the Local Operating Companies (2000-2001) 01.03.2003 This report summarizes various kinds of service quality data filed by certain incumbent local... * [82]9th Annual Video Competition Report 12.31.2002 This is the Commissions ninth annual report (2002 Report) to Congress on
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/fcc2003budget.html?page=20
  • (FCCs) report on telephone subscribership in the... * [81]Third Broadband Progress Report 02.07.2002 The FCC released its third report on the availability of advanced telecommunications capability... * [82]High Speed Services for Internet Access (As of 06/30/01) 02.01.2002 We summarize here information from the fourth data collection, thereby presenting a snapshot of... * [83]Quarterly Inquiries and Complaints Report (1st Qtr, 2002) 01.17.2002 This report tracks the top subject areas for consumer inquiries and complaints received during the... * [84]8th Annual Video Competition Report 01.14.2002 This is the Commissions eighth annual report (2001 Report) to Congress on the status of ... * [85]Quality of Service Report of the Local Operating Companies (1999-2000) 12.05.2001 This report summarizes various kinds of service quality data filed
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/fcc2003budget.html?page=20&contrast=
  • (FCCs) report on telephone subscribership in the... * [81]Third Broadband Progress Report 02.07.2002 The FCC released its third report on the availability of advanced telecommunications capability... * [82]High Speed Services for Internet Access (As of 06/30/01) 02.01.2002 We summarize here information from the fourth data collection, thereby presenting a snapshot of... * [83]Quarterly Inquiries and Complaints Report (1st Qtr, 2002) 01.17.2002 This report tracks the top subject areas for consumer inquiries and complaints received during the... * [84]8th Annual Video Competition Report 01.14.2002 This is the Commissions eighth annual report (2001 Report) to Congress on the status of ... * [85]Quality of Service Report of the Local Operating Companies (1999-2000) 12.05.2001 This report summarizes various kinds of service quality data filed
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/fcc2003budget.html?page=20&contrast=highContrast
  • (FCCs) report on telephone subscribership in the... * [81]Third Broadband Progress Report 02.07.2002 The FCC released its third report on the availability of advanced telecommunications capability... * [82]High Speed Services for Internet Access (As of 06/30/01) 02.01.2002 We summarize here information from the fourth data collection, thereby presenting a snapshot of... * [83]Quarterly Inquiries and Complaints Report (1st Qtr, 2002) 01.17.2002 This report tracks the top subject areas for consumer inquiries and complaints received during the... * [84]8th Annual Video Competition Report 01.14.2002 This is the Commissions eighth annual report (2001 Report) to Congress on the status of ... * [85]Quality of Service Report of the Local Operating Companies (1999-2000) 12.05.2001 This report summarizes various kinds of service quality data filed
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/fcc2003budget.html?page=20&fontsize=
  • (FCCs) report on telephone subscribership in the... * [81]Third Broadband Progress Report 02.07.2002 The FCC released its third report on the availability of advanced telecommunications capability... * [82]High Speed Services for Internet Access (As of 06/30/01) 02.01.2002 We summarize here information from the fourth data collection, thereby presenting a snapshot of... * [83]Quarterly Inquiries and Complaints Report (1st Qtr, 2002) 01.17.2002 This report tracks the top subject areas for consumer inquiries and complaints received during the... * [84]8th Annual Video Competition Report 01.14.2002 This is the Commissions eighth annual report (2001 Report) to Congress on the status of ... * [85]Quality of Service Report of the Local Operating Companies (1999-2000) 12.05.2001 This report summarizes various kinds of service quality data filed
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/fcc2003budget.html?page=20&fontsize=largeFont
  • (FCCs) report on telephone subscribership in the... * [81]Third Broadband Progress Report 02.07.2002 The FCC released its third report on the availability of advanced telecommunications capability... * [82]High Speed Services for Internet Access (As of 06/30/01) 02.01.2002 We summarize here information from the fourth data collection, thereby presenting a snapshot of... * [83]Quarterly Inquiries and Complaints Report (1st Qtr, 2002) 01.17.2002 This report tracks the top subject areas for consumer inquiries and complaints received during the... * [84]8th Annual Video Competition Report 01.14.2002 This is the Commissions eighth annual report (2001 Report) to Congress on the status of ... * [85]Quality of Service Report of the Local Operating Companies (1999-2000) 12.05.2001 This report summarizes various kinds of service quality data filed
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/fcc2003budget.html?page=20&fontsize=mediumFont
  • (FCCs) report on telephone subscribership in the... * [81]Third Broadband Progress Report 02.07.2002 The FCC released its third report on the availability of advanced telecommunications capability... * [82]High Speed Services for Internet Access (As of 06/30/01) 02.01.2002 We summarize here information from the fourth data collection, thereby presenting a snapshot of... * [83]Quarterly Inquiries and Complaints Report (1st Qtr, 2002) 01.17.2002 This report tracks the top subject areas for consumer inquiries and complaints received during the... * [84]8th Annual Video Competition Report 01.14.2002 This is the Commissions eighth annual report (2001 Report) to Congress on the status of ... * [85]Quality of Service Report of the Local Operating Companies (1999-2000) 12.05.2001 This report summarizes various kinds of service quality data filed
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/fcc2003budget.html?page=4
  • 43.61 International Traffic Data Reports [_] Statistics of Communications Common Carrier Reports [_] Telephone Penetration Reports [_] Telephone Subscribership Reports [_] Trends in Telephony Service [_] Video Competition Reports Apply Filter * [79]Telephone Subscribership Report (through November 2009) 02.02.2010 This is the Federal Communications Commissions (FCCs) report on telephone subscribership in... * [80]Quarterly Inquiries and Complaints Report (1st Qtr, 2010) 01.17.2010 This report tracks the top subject areas for consumer inquiries and complaints received during the... * [81]Quality of Service Report of the Local Operating Companies (2007-2008) 12.24.2009 This report summarizes the Automated Reporting Management Information System (ARMIS) service... * [82]Telephone Subscribership Report (through July 2009) 12.15.2009 This is the Federal Communications Commissions (FCCs) report on telephone subscribership in... * [83]Quarterly
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/fcc2003budget.html?page=4&contrast=
  • 43.61 International Traffic Data Reports [_] Statistics of Communications Common Carrier Reports [_] Telephone Penetration Reports [_] Telephone Subscribership Reports [_] Trends in Telephony Service [_] Video Competition Reports Apply Filter * [79]Telephone Subscribership Report (through November 2009) 02.02.2010 This is the Federal Communications Commissions (FCCs) report on telephone subscribership in... * [80]Quarterly Inquiries and Complaints Report (1st Qtr, 2010) 01.17.2010 This report tracks the top subject areas for consumer inquiries and complaints received during the... * [81]Quality of Service Report of the Local Operating Companies (2007-2008) 12.24.2009 This report summarizes the Automated Reporting Management Information System (ARMIS) service... * [82]Telephone Subscribership Report (through July 2009) 12.15.2009 This is the Federal Communications Commissions (FCCs) report on telephone subscribership in... * [83]Quarterly
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/fcc2003budget.html?page=4&contrast=highContrast
  • 43.61 International Traffic Data Reports [_] Statistics of Communications Common Carrier Reports [_] Telephone Penetration Reports [_] Telephone Subscribership Reports [_] Trends in Telephony Service [_] Video Competition Reports Apply Filter * [79]Telephone Subscribership Report (through November 2009) 02.02.2010 This is the Federal Communications Commissions (FCCs) report on telephone subscribership in... * [80]Quarterly Inquiries and Complaints Report (1st Qtr, 2010) 01.17.2010 This report tracks the top subject areas for consumer inquiries and complaints received during the... * [81]Quality of Service Report of the Local Operating Companies (2007-2008) 12.24.2009 This report summarizes the Automated Reporting Management Information System (ARMIS) service... * [82]Telephone Subscribership Report (through July 2009) 12.15.2009 This is the Federal Communications Commissions (FCCs) report on telephone subscribership in... * [83]Quarterly
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/fcc2003budget.html?page=4&fontsize=
  • 43.61 International Traffic Data Reports [_] Statistics of Communications Common Carrier Reports [_] Telephone Penetration Reports [_] Telephone Subscribership Reports [_] Trends in Telephony Service [_] Video Competition Reports Apply Filter * [79]Telephone Subscribership Report (through November 2009) 02.02.2010 This is the Federal Communications Commissions (FCCs) report on telephone subscribership in... * [80]Quarterly Inquiries and Complaints Report (1st Qtr, 2010) 01.17.2010 This report tracks the top subject areas for consumer inquiries and complaints received during the... * [81]Quality of Service Report of the Local Operating Companies (2007-2008) 12.24.2009 This report summarizes the Automated Reporting Management Information System (ARMIS) service... * [82]Telephone Subscribership Report (through July 2009) 12.15.2009 This is the Federal Communications Commissions (FCCs) report on telephone subscribership in... * [83]Quarterly
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/fcc2003budget.html?page=4&fontsize=largeFont
  • 43.61 International Traffic Data Reports [_] Statistics of Communications Common Carrier Reports [_] Telephone Penetration Reports [_] Telephone Subscribership Reports [_] Trends in Telephony Service [_] Video Competition Reports Apply Filter * [79]Telephone Subscribership Report (through November 2009) 02.02.2010 This is the Federal Communications Commissions (FCCs) report on telephone subscribership in... * [80]Quarterly Inquiries and Complaints Report (1st Qtr, 2010) 01.17.2010 This report tracks the top subject areas for consumer inquiries and complaints received during the... * [81]Quality of Service Report of the Local Operating Companies (2007-2008) 12.24.2009 This report summarizes the Automated Reporting Management Information System (ARMIS) service... * [82]Telephone Subscribership Report (through July 2009) 12.15.2009 This is the Federal Communications Commissions (FCCs) report on telephone subscribership in... * [83]Quarterly
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/fcc2003budget.html?page=4&fontsize=mediumFont
  • 43.61 International Traffic Data Reports [_] Statistics of Communications Common Carrier Reports [_] Telephone Penetration Reports [_] Telephone Subscribership Reports [_] Trends in Telephony Service [_] Video Competition Reports Apply Filter * [79]Telephone Subscribership Report (through November 2009) 02.02.2010 This is the Federal Communications Commissions (FCCs) report on telephone subscribership in... * [80]Quarterly Inquiries and Complaints Report (1st Qtr, 2010) 01.17.2010 This report tracks the top subject areas for consumer inquiries and complaints received during the... * [81]Quality of Service Report of the Local Operating Companies (2007-2008) 12.24.2009 This report summarizes the Automated Reporting Management Information System (ARMIS) service... * [82]Telephone Subscribership Report (through July 2009) 12.15.2009 This is the Federal Communications Commissions (FCCs) report on telephone subscribership in... * [83]Quarterly
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/fcc2003budget.html?page=9
  • its annual year-end circuit status report for U.... * [86]Trends in Telephony Service (2007) 02.01.2007 Trends in Telephone Service is published by the Industry Analysis and Technology Division of... * [87]High Speed Services for Internet Access (As of 06/30/06) 01.31.2007 We summarize here information from the fourteenth semi-annual data collection, thereby presenting a... * [88]Telephone Subscribership Report (through July 2006) 01.17.2007 This is the Federal Communications Commissions (FCCs) report on telephone subscribership in... * [89] * [90] * * [91]6 * [92]7 * [93]8 * [94]9 * 10 * [95]11 * [96]12 * [97]13 * [98]14 * * [99] * [100] Connect * [101]Facebook * [102]Twitter * [103]YouTube * [104]Flickr Share this page * Reddit * Digg * Facebook * Twitter
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/fcc2003budget.html?page=9&contrast=
  • its annual year-end circuit status report for U.... * [86]Trends in Telephony Service (2007) 02.01.2007 Trends in Telephone Service is published by the Industry Analysis and Technology Division of... * [87]High Speed Services for Internet Access (As of 06/30/06) 01.31.2007 We summarize here information from the fourteenth semi-annual data collection, thereby presenting a... * [88]Telephone Subscribership Report (through July 2006) 01.17.2007 This is the Federal Communications Commissions (FCCs) report on telephone subscribership in... * [89] * [90] * * [91]6 * [92]7 * [93]8 * [94]9 * 10 * [95]11 * [96]12 * [97]13 * [98]14 * * [99] * [100] Connect * [101]Facebook * [102]Twitter * [103]YouTube * [104]Flickr Share this page * Reddit * Digg * Facebook * Twitter
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/fcc2003budget.html?page=9&contrast=highContrast
  • its annual year-end circuit status report for U.... * [86]Trends in Telephony Service (2007) 02.01.2007 Trends in Telephone Service is published by the Industry Analysis and Technology Division of... * [87]High Speed Services for Internet Access (As of 06/30/06) 01.31.2007 We summarize here information from the fourteenth semi-annual data collection, thereby presenting a... * [88]Telephone Subscribership Report (through July 2006) 01.17.2007 This is the Federal Communications Commissions (FCCs) report on telephone subscribership in... * [89] * [90] * * [91]6 * [92]7 * [93]8 * [94]9 * 10 * [95]11 * [96]12 * [97]13 * [98]14 * * [99] * [100] Connect * [101]Facebook * [102]Twitter * [103]YouTube * [104]Flickr Share this page * Reddit * Digg * Facebook * Twitter
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/fcc2003budget.html?page=9&fontsize=
  • its annual year-end circuit status report for U.... * [86]Trends in Telephony Service (2007) 02.01.2007 Trends in Telephone Service is published by the Industry Analysis and Technology Division of... * [87]High Speed Services for Internet Access (As of 06/30/06) 01.31.2007 We summarize here information from the fourteenth semi-annual data collection, thereby presenting a... * [88]Telephone Subscribership Report (through July 2006) 01.17.2007 This is the Federal Communications Commissions (FCCs) report on telephone subscribership in... * [89] * [90] * * [91]6 * [92]7 * [93]8 * [94]9 * 10 * [95]11 * [96]12 * [97]13 * [98]14 * * [99] * [100] Connect * [101]Facebook * [102]Twitter * [103]YouTube * [104]Flickr Share this page * Reddit * Digg * Facebook * Twitter
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/fcc2003budget.html?page=9&fontsize=largeFont
  • its annual year-end circuit status report for U.... * [86]Trends in Telephony Service (2007) 02.01.2007 Trends in Telephone Service is published by the Industry Analysis and Technology Division of... * [87]High Speed Services for Internet Access (As of 06/30/06) 01.31.2007 We summarize here information from the fourteenth semi-annual data collection, thereby presenting a... * [88]Telephone Subscribership Report (through July 2006) 01.17.2007 This is the Federal Communications Commissions (FCCs) report on telephone subscribership in... * [89] * [90] * * [91]6 * [92]7 * [93]8 * [94]9 * 10 * [95]11 * [96]12 * [97]13 * [98]14 * * [99] * [100] Connect * [101]Facebook * [102]Twitter * [103]YouTube * [104]Flickr Share this page * Reddit * Digg * Facebook * Twitter
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/fcc2003budget.html?page=9&fontsize=mediumFont
  • its annual year-end circuit status report for U.... * [86]Trends in Telephony Service (2007) 02.01.2007 Trends in Telephone Service is published by the Industry Analysis and Technology Division of... * [87]High Speed Services for Internet Access (As of 06/30/06) 01.31.2007 We summarize here information from the fourteenth semi-annual data collection, thereby presenting a... * [88]Telephone Subscribership Report (through July 2006) 01.17.2007 This is the Federal Communications Commissions (FCCs) report on telephone subscribership in... * [89] * [90] * * [91]6 * [92]7 * [93]8 * [94]9 * 10 * [95]11 * [96]12 * [97]13 * [98]14 * * [99] * [100] Connect * [101]Facebook * [102]Twitter * [103]YouTube * [104]Flickr Share this page * Reddit * Digg * Facebook * Twitter
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/fcc2004budget.html?page=10
  • to Congress as required by the Orbit Act [_] Satellite Competition Reports [_] Section 257 Triennial Reports [_] Section 43.61 International Traffic Data Reports [_] Statistics of Communications Common Carrier Reports [_] Telephone Penetration Reports [_] Telephone Subscribership Reports [_] Trends in Telephony Service [_] Video Competition Reports Apply Filter * [79]Numbering Resource Utilization in the U.S. (As of 12/31/05) 01.17.2007 This is the Federal Communications Commissions report on numbering resource utilization in... * [80]Local Telephone Competition (As of 06/30/06) 01.07.2007 We present here summary statistics of the latest data on local telephone service competition in... * [81]Report on Cable Industry Prices (2005) 12.27.2006 Section 623(k) of the Communications Act, as amended by the Cable Television Consumer ... * [82]Commercial Mobile
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/fcc2004budget.html?page=10&contrast=
  • to Congress as required by the Orbit Act [_] Satellite Competition Reports [_] Section 257 Triennial Reports [_] Section 43.61 International Traffic Data Reports [_] Statistics of Communications Common Carrier Reports [_] Telephone Penetration Reports [_] Telephone Subscribership Reports [_] Trends in Telephony Service [_] Video Competition Reports Apply Filter * [79]Numbering Resource Utilization in the U.S. (As of 12/31/05) 01.17.2007 This is the Federal Communications Commissions report on numbering resource utilization in... * [80]Local Telephone Competition (As of 06/30/06) 01.07.2007 We present here summary statistics of the latest data on local telephone service competition in... * [81]Report on Cable Industry Prices (2005) 12.27.2006 Section 623(k) of the Communications Act, as amended by the Cable Television Consumer ... * [82]Commercial Mobile
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/fcc2004budget.html?page=10&contrast=highContrast
  • to Congress as required by the Orbit Act [_] Satellite Competition Reports [_] Section 257 Triennial Reports [_] Section 43.61 International Traffic Data Reports [_] Statistics of Communications Common Carrier Reports [_] Telephone Penetration Reports [_] Telephone Subscribership Reports [_] Trends in Telephony Service [_] Video Competition Reports Apply Filter * [79]Numbering Resource Utilization in the U.S. (As of 12/31/05) 01.17.2007 This is the Federal Communications Commissions report on numbering resource utilization in... * [80]Local Telephone Competition (As of 06/30/06) 01.07.2007 We present here summary statistics of the latest data on local telephone service competition in... * [81]Report on Cable Industry Prices (2005) 12.27.2006 Section 623(k) of the Communications Act, as amended by the Cable Television Consumer ... * [82]Commercial Mobile
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/fcc2004budget.html?page=10&fontsize=
  • to Congress as required by the Orbit Act [_] Satellite Competition Reports [_] Section 257 Triennial Reports [_] Section 43.61 International Traffic Data Reports [_] Statistics of Communications Common Carrier Reports [_] Telephone Penetration Reports [_] Telephone Subscribership Reports [_] Trends in Telephony Service [_] Video Competition Reports Apply Filter * [79]Numbering Resource Utilization in the U.S. (As of 12/31/05) 01.17.2007 This is the Federal Communications Commissions report on numbering resource utilization in... * [80]Local Telephone Competition (As of 06/30/06) 01.07.2007 We present here summary statistics of the latest data on local telephone service competition in... * [81]Report on Cable Industry Prices (2005) 12.27.2006 Section 623(k) of the Communications Act, as amended by the Cable Television Consumer ... * [82]Commercial Mobile
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/fcc2004budget.html?page=10&fontsize=largeFont
  • to Congress as required by the Orbit Act [_] Satellite Competition Reports [_] Section 257 Triennial Reports [_] Section 43.61 International Traffic Data Reports [_] Statistics of Communications Common Carrier Reports [_] Telephone Penetration Reports [_] Telephone Subscribership Reports [_] Trends in Telephony Service [_] Video Competition Reports Apply Filter * [79]Numbering Resource Utilization in the U.S. (As of 12/31/05) 01.17.2007 This is the Federal Communications Commissions report on numbering resource utilization in... * [80]Local Telephone Competition (As of 06/30/06) 01.07.2007 We present here summary statistics of the latest data on local telephone service competition in... * [81]Report on Cable Industry Prices (2005) 12.27.2006 Section 623(k) of the Communications Act, as amended by the Cable Television Consumer ... * [82]Commercial Mobile
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/fcc2004budget.html?page=10&fontsize=mediumFont
  • to Congress as required by the Orbit Act [_] Satellite Competition Reports [_] Section 257 Triennial Reports [_] Section 43.61 International Traffic Data Reports [_] Statistics of Communications Common Carrier Reports [_] Telephone Penetration Reports [_] Telephone Subscribership Reports [_] Trends in Telephony Service [_] Video Competition Reports Apply Filter * [79]Numbering Resource Utilization in the U.S. (As of 12/31/05) 01.17.2007 This is the Federal Communications Commissions report on numbering resource utilization in... * [80]Local Telephone Competition (As of 06/30/06) 01.07.2007 We present here summary statistics of the latest data on local telephone service competition in... * [81]Report on Cable Industry Prices (2005) 12.27.2006 Section 623(k) of the Communications Act, as amended by the Cable Television Consumer ... * [82]Commercial Mobile
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/fcc2004budget.html?page=18
  • 43.61 International Traffic Data Reports [_] Statistics of Communications Common Carrier Reports [_] Telephone Penetration Reports [_] Telephone Subscribership Reports [_] Trends in Telephony Service [_] Video Competition Reports Apply Filter * [79]Telephone Subscribership Report (through July 2002) 02.12.2003 This is the Federal Communications Commissions (FCCs) report on telephone subscribership in... * [80]Quarterly Inquiries and Complaints Report (1st Qtr, 2003) 01.17.2003 This report tracks the top subject areas for consumer inquiries and complaints received during the... * [81]Quality of Service Report of the Local Operating Companies (2000-2001) 01.03.2003 This report summarizes various kinds of service quality data filed by certain incumbent local... * [82]9th Annual Video Competition Report 12.31.2002 This is the Commissions ninth annual report (2002 Report) to Congress on
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/fcc2004budget.html?page=18&contrast=
  • 43.61 International Traffic Data Reports [_] Statistics of Communications Common Carrier Reports [_] Telephone Penetration Reports [_] Telephone Subscribership Reports [_] Trends in Telephony Service [_] Video Competition Reports Apply Filter * [79]Telephone Subscribership Report (through July 2002) 02.12.2003 This is the Federal Communications Commissions (FCCs) report on telephone subscribership in... * [80]Quarterly Inquiries and Complaints Report (1st Qtr, 2003) 01.17.2003 This report tracks the top subject areas for consumer inquiries and complaints received during the... * [81]Quality of Service Report of the Local Operating Companies (2000-2001) 01.03.2003 This report summarizes various kinds of service quality data filed by certain incumbent local... * [82]9th Annual Video Competition Report 12.31.2002 This is the Commissions ninth annual report (2002 Report) to Congress on
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/fcc2004budget.html?page=18&contrast=highContrast
  • 43.61 International Traffic Data Reports [_] Statistics of Communications Common Carrier Reports [_] Telephone Penetration Reports [_] Telephone Subscribership Reports [_] Trends in Telephony Service [_] Video Competition Reports Apply Filter * [79]Telephone Subscribership Report (through July 2002) 02.12.2003 This is the Federal Communications Commissions (FCCs) report on telephone subscribership in... * [80]Quarterly Inquiries and Complaints Report (1st Qtr, 2003) 01.17.2003 This report tracks the top subject areas for consumer inquiries and complaints received during the... * [81]Quality of Service Report of the Local Operating Companies (2000-2001) 01.03.2003 This report summarizes various kinds of service quality data filed by certain incumbent local... * [82]9th Annual Video Competition Report 12.31.2002 This is the Commissions ninth annual report (2002 Report) to Congress on
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/fcc2004budget.html?page=18&fontsize=
  • 43.61 International Traffic Data Reports [_] Statistics of Communications Common Carrier Reports [_] Telephone Penetration Reports [_] Telephone Subscribership Reports [_] Trends in Telephony Service [_] Video Competition Reports Apply Filter * [79]Telephone Subscribership Report (through July 2002) 02.12.2003 This is the Federal Communications Commissions (FCCs) report on telephone subscribership in... * [80]Quarterly Inquiries and Complaints Report (1st Qtr, 2003) 01.17.2003 This report tracks the top subject areas for consumer inquiries and complaints received during the... * [81]Quality of Service Report of the Local Operating Companies (2000-2001) 01.03.2003 This report summarizes various kinds of service quality data filed by certain incumbent local... * [82]9th Annual Video Competition Report 12.31.2002 This is the Commissions ninth annual report (2002 Report) to Congress on
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/fcc2004budget.html?page=18&fontsize=largeFont
  • 43.61 International Traffic Data Reports [_] Statistics of Communications Common Carrier Reports [_] Telephone Penetration Reports [_] Telephone Subscribership Reports [_] Trends in Telephony Service [_] Video Competition Reports Apply Filter * [79]Telephone Subscribership Report (through July 2002) 02.12.2003 This is the Federal Communications Commissions (FCCs) report on telephone subscribership in... * [80]Quarterly Inquiries and Complaints Report (1st Qtr, 2003) 01.17.2003 This report tracks the top subject areas for consumer inquiries and complaints received during the... * [81]Quality of Service Report of the Local Operating Companies (2000-2001) 01.03.2003 This report summarizes various kinds of service quality data filed by certain incumbent local... * [82]9th Annual Video Competition Report 12.31.2002 This is the Commissions ninth annual report (2002 Report) to Congress on
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/fcc2004budget.html?page=18&fontsize=mediumFont
  • 43.61 International Traffic Data Reports [_] Statistics of Communications Common Carrier Reports [_] Telephone Penetration Reports [_] Telephone Subscribership Reports [_] Trends in Telephony Service [_] Video Competition Reports Apply Filter * [79]Telephone Subscribership Report (through July 2002) 02.12.2003 This is the Federal Communications Commissions (FCCs) report on telephone subscribership in... * [80]Quarterly Inquiries and Complaints Report (1st Qtr, 2003) 01.17.2003 This report tracks the top subject areas for consumer inquiries and complaints received during the... * [81]Quality of Service Report of the Local Operating Companies (2000-2001) 01.03.2003 This report summarizes various kinds of service quality data filed by certain incumbent local... * [82]9th Annual Video Competition Report 12.31.2002 This is the Commissions ninth annual report (2002 Report) to Congress on
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/fcc2004budget.html?page=20
  • (FCCs) report on telephone subscribership in the... * [81]Third Broadband Progress Report 02.07.2002 The FCC released its third report on the availability of advanced telecommunications capability... * [82]High Speed Services for Internet Access (As of 06/30/01) 02.01.2002 We summarize here information from the fourth data collection, thereby presenting a snapshot of... * [83]Quarterly Inquiries and Complaints Report (1st Qtr, 2002) 01.17.2002 This report tracks the top subject areas for consumer inquiries and complaints received during the... * [84]8th Annual Video Competition Report 01.14.2002 This is the Commissions eighth annual report (2001 Report) to Congress on the status of ... * [85]Quality of Service Report of the Local Operating Companies (1999-2000) 12.05.2001 This report summarizes various kinds of service quality data filed
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/fcc2004budget.html?page=20&contrast=
  • (FCCs) report on telephone subscribership in the... * [81]Third Broadband Progress Report 02.07.2002 The FCC released its third report on the availability of advanced telecommunications capability... * [82]High Speed Services for Internet Access (As of 06/30/01) 02.01.2002 We summarize here information from the fourth data collection, thereby presenting a snapshot of... * [83]Quarterly Inquiries and Complaints Report (1st Qtr, 2002) 01.17.2002 This report tracks the top subject areas for consumer inquiries and complaints received during the... * [84]8th Annual Video Competition Report 01.14.2002 This is the Commissions eighth annual report (2001 Report) to Congress on the status of ... * [85]Quality of Service Report of the Local Operating Companies (1999-2000) 12.05.2001 This report summarizes various kinds of service quality data filed
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/fcc2004budget.html?page=20&contrast=highContrast
  • (FCCs) report on telephone subscribership in the... * [81]Third Broadband Progress Report 02.07.2002 The FCC released its third report on the availability of advanced telecommunications capability... * [82]High Speed Services for Internet Access (As of 06/30/01) 02.01.2002 We summarize here information from the fourth data collection, thereby presenting a snapshot of... * [83]Quarterly Inquiries and Complaints Report (1st Qtr, 2002) 01.17.2002 This report tracks the top subject areas for consumer inquiries and complaints received during the... * [84]8th Annual Video Competition Report 01.14.2002 This is the Commissions eighth annual report (2001 Report) to Congress on the status of ... * [85]Quality of Service Report of the Local Operating Companies (1999-2000) 12.05.2001 This report summarizes various kinds of service quality data filed
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/fcc2004budget.html?page=20&fontsize=
  • (FCCs) report on telephone subscribership in the... * [81]Third Broadband Progress Report 02.07.2002 The FCC released its third report on the availability of advanced telecommunications capability... * [82]High Speed Services for Internet Access (As of 06/30/01) 02.01.2002 We summarize here information from the fourth data collection, thereby presenting a snapshot of... * [83]Quarterly Inquiries and Complaints Report (1st Qtr, 2002) 01.17.2002 This report tracks the top subject areas for consumer inquiries and complaints received during the... * [84]8th Annual Video Competition Report 01.14.2002 This is the Commissions eighth annual report (2001 Report) to Congress on the status of ... * [85]Quality of Service Report of the Local Operating Companies (1999-2000) 12.05.2001 This report summarizes various kinds of service quality data filed
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/fcc2004budget.html?page=20&fontsize=largeFont
  • (FCCs) report on telephone subscribership in the... * [81]Third Broadband Progress Report 02.07.2002 The FCC released its third report on the availability of advanced telecommunications capability... * [82]High Speed Services for Internet Access (As of 06/30/01) 02.01.2002 We summarize here information from the fourth data collection, thereby presenting a snapshot of... * [83]Quarterly Inquiries and Complaints Report (1st Qtr, 2002) 01.17.2002 This report tracks the top subject areas for consumer inquiries and complaints received during the... * [84]8th Annual Video Competition Report 01.14.2002 This is the Commissions eighth annual report (2001 Report) to Congress on the status of ... * [85]Quality of Service Report of the Local Operating Companies (1999-2000) 12.05.2001 This report summarizes various kinds of service quality data filed
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/fcc2004budget.html?page=20&fontsize=mediumFont
  • (FCCs) report on telephone subscribership in the... * [81]Third Broadband Progress Report 02.07.2002 The FCC released its third report on the availability of advanced telecommunications capability... * [82]High Speed Services for Internet Access (As of 06/30/01) 02.01.2002 We summarize here information from the fourth data collection, thereby presenting a snapshot of... * [83]Quarterly Inquiries and Complaints Report (1st Qtr, 2002) 01.17.2002 This report tracks the top subject areas for consumer inquiries and complaints received during the... * [84]8th Annual Video Competition Report 01.14.2002 This is the Commissions eighth annual report (2001 Report) to Congress on the status of ... * [85]Quality of Service Report of the Local Operating Companies (1999-2000) 12.05.2001 This report summarizes various kinds of service quality data filed
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/fcc2004budget.html?page=4
  • 43.61 International Traffic Data Reports [_] Statistics of Communications Common Carrier Reports [_] Telephone Penetration Reports [_] Telephone Subscribership Reports [_] Trends in Telephony Service [_] Video Competition Reports Apply Filter * [79]Telephone Subscribership Report (through November 2009) 02.02.2010 This is the Federal Communications Commissions (FCCs) report on telephone subscribership in... * [80]Quarterly Inquiries and Complaints Report (1st Qtr, 2010) 01.17.2010 This report tracks the top subject areas for consumer inquiries and complaints received during the... * [81]Quality of Service Report of the Local Operating Companies (2007-2008) 12.24.2009 This report summarizes the Automated Reporting Management Information System (ARMIS) service... * [82]Telephone Subscribership Report (through July 2009) 12.15.2009 This is the Federal Communications Commissions (FCCs) report on telephone subscribership in... * [83]Quarterly
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/fcc2004budget.html?page=4&contrast=
  • 43.61 International Traffic Data Reports [_] Statistics of Communications Common Carrier Reports [_] Telephone Penetration Reports [_] Telephone Subscribership Reports [_] Trends in Telephony Service [_] Video Competition Reports Apply Filter * [79]Telephone Subscribership Report (through November 2009) 02.02.2010 This is the Federal Communications Commissions (FCCs) report on telephone subscribership in... * [80]Quarterly Inquiries and Complaints Report (1st Qtr, 2010) 01.17.2010 This report tracks the top subject areas for consumer inquiries and complaints received during the... * [81]Quality of Service Report of the Local Operating Companies (2007-2008) 12.24.2009 This report summarizes the Automated Reporting Management Information System (ARMIS) service... * [82]Telephone Subscribership Report (through July 2009) 12.15.2009 This is the Federal Communications Commissions (FCCs) report on telephone subscribership in... * [83]Quarterly
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/fcc2004budget.html?page=4&contrast=highContrast
  • 43.61 International Traffic Data Reports [_] Statistics of Communications Common Carrier Reports [_] Telephone Penetration Reports [_] Telephone Subscribership Reports [_] Trends in Telephony Service [_] Video Competition Reports Apply Filter * [79]Telephone Subscribership Report (through November 2009) 02.02.2010 This is the Federal Communications Commissions (FCCs) report on telephone subscribership in... * [80]Quarterly Inquiries and Complaints Report (1st Qtr, 2010) 01.17.2010 This report tracks the top subject areas for consumer inquiries and complaints received during the... * [81]Quality of Service Report of the Local Operating Companies (2007-2008) 12.24.2009 This report summarizes the Automated Reporting Management Information System (ARMIS) service... * [82]Telephone Subscribership Report (through July 2009) 12.15.2009 This is the Federal Communications Commissions (FCCs) report on telephone subscribership in... * [83]Quarterly
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/fcc2004budget.html?page=4&fontsize=
  • 43.61 International Traffic Data Reports [_] Statistics of Communications Common Carrier Reports [_] Telephone Penetration Reports [_] Telephone Subscribership Reports [_] Trends in Telephony Service [_] Video Competition Reports Apply Filter * [79]Telephone Subscribership Report (through November 2009) 02.02.2010 This is the Federal Communications Commissions (FCCs) report on telephone subscribership in... * [80]Quarterly Inquiries and Complaints Report (1st Qtr, 2010) 01.17.2010 This report tracks the top subject areas for consumer inquiries and complaints received during the... * [81]Quality of Service Report of the Local Operating Companies (2007-2008) 12.24.2009 This report summarizes the Automated Reporting Management Information System (ARMIS) service... * [82]Telephone Subscribership Report (through July 2009) 12.15.2009 This is the Federal Communications Commissions (FCCs) report on telephone subscribership in... * [83]Quarterly
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/fcc2004budget.html?page=4&fontsize=largeFont
  • 43.61 International Traffic Data Reports [_] Statistics of Communications Common Carrier Reports [_] Telephone Penetration Reports [_] Telephone Subscribership Reports [_] Trends in Telephony Service [_] Video Competition Reports Apply Filter * [79]Telephone Subscribership Report (through November 2009) 02.02.2010 This is the Federal Communications Commissions (FCCs) report on telephone subscribership in... * [80]Quarterly Inquiries and Complaints Report (1st Qtr, 2010) 01.17.2010 This report tracks the top subject areas for consumer inquiries and complaints received during the... * [81]Quality of Service Report of the Local Operating Companies (2007-2008) 12.24.2009 This report summarizes the Automated Reporting Management Information System (ARMIS) service... * [82]Telephone Subscribership Report (through July 2009) 12.15.2009 This is the Federal Communications Commissions (FCCs) report on telephone subscribership in... * [83]Quarterly
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/fcc2004budget.html?page=4&fontsize=mediumFont
  • 43.61 International Traffic Data Reports [_] Statistics of Communications Common Carrier Reports [_] Telephone Penetration Reports [_] Telephone Subscribership Reports [_] Trends in Telephony Service [_] Video Competition Reports Apply Filter * [79]Telephone Subscribership Report (through November 2009) 02.02.2010 This is the Federal Communications Commissions (FCCs) report on telephone subscribership in... * [80]Quarterly Inquiries and Complaints Report (1st Qtr, 2010) 01.17.2010 This report tracks the top subject areas for consumer inquiries and complaints received during the... * [81]Quality of Service Report of the Local Operating Companies (2007-2008) 12.24.2009 This report summarizes the Automated Reporting Management Information System (ARMIS) service... * [82]Telephone Subscribership Report (through July 2009) 12.15.2009 This is the Federal Communications Commissions (FCCs) report on telephone subscribership in... * [83]Quarterly
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/fcc2004budget.html?page=9
  • its annual year-end circuit status report for U.... * [86]Trends in Telephony Service (2007) 02.01.2007 Trends in Telephone Service is published by the Industry Analysis and Technology Division of... * [87]High Speed Services for Internet Access (As of 06/30/06) 01.31.2007 We summarize here information from the fourteenth semi-annual data collection, thereby presenting a... * [88]Telephone Subscribership Report (through July 2006) 01.17.2007 This is the Federal Communications Commissions (FCCs) report on telephone subscribership in... * [89] * [90] * * [91]6 * [92]7 * [93]8 * [94]9 * 10 * [95]11 * [96]12 * [97]13 * [98]14 * * [99] * [100] Connect * [101]Facebook * [102]Twitter * [103]YouTube * [104]Flickr Share this page * Reddit * Digg * Facebook * Twitter
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/fcc2004budget.html?page=9&contrast=
  • its annual year-end circuit status report for U.... * [86]Trends in Telephony Service (2007) 02.01.2007 Trends in Telephone Service is published by the Industry Analysis and Technology Division of... * [87]High Speed Services for Internet Access (As of 06/30/06) 01.31.2007 We summarize here information from the fourteenth semi-annual data collection, thereby presenting a... * [88]Telephone Subscribership Report (through July 2006) 01.17.2007 This is the Federal Communications Commissions (FCCs) report on telephone subscribership in... * [89] * [90] * * [91]6 * [92]7 * [93]8 * [94]9 * 10 * [95]11 * [96]12 * [97]13 * [98]14 * * [99] * [100] Connect * [101]Facebook * [102]Twitter * [103]YouTube * [104]Flickr Share this page * Reddit * Digg * Facebook * Twitter
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/fcc2004budget.html?page=9&contrast=highContrast
  • its annual year-end circuit status report for U.... * [86]Trends in Telephony Service (2007) 02.01.2007 Trends in Telephone Service is published by the Industry Analysis and Technology Division of... * [87]High Speed Services for Internet Access (As of 06/30/06) 01.31.2007 We summarize here information from the fourteenth semi-annual data collection, thereby presenting a... * [88]Telephone Subscribership Report (through July 2006) 01.17.2007 This is the Federal Communications Commissions (FCCs) report on telephone subscribership in... * [89] * [90] * * [91]6 * [92]7 * [93]8 * [94]9 * 10 * [95]11 * [96]12 * [97]13 * [98]14 * * [99] * [100] Connect * [101]Facebook * [102]Twitter * [103]YouTube * [104]Flickr Share this page * Reddit * Digg * Facebook * Twitter
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/fcc2004budget.html?page=9&fontsize=
  • its annual year-end circuit status report for U.... * [86]Trends in Telephony Service (2007) 02.01.2007 Trends in Telephone Service is published by the Industry Analysis and Technology Division of... * [87]High Speed Services for Internet Access (As of 06/30/06) 01.31.2007 We summarize here information from the fourteenth semi-annual data collection, thereby presenting a... * [88]Telephone Subscribership Report (through July 2006) 01.17.2007 This is the Federal Communications Commissions (FCCs) report on telephone subscribership in... * [89] * [90] * * [91]6 * [92]7 * [93]8 * [94]9 * 10 * [95]11 * [96]12 * [97]13 * [98]14 * * [99] * [100] Connect * [101]Facebook * [102]Twitter * [103]YouTube * [104]Flickr Share this page * Reddit * Digg * Facebook * Twitter
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/fcc2004budget.html?page=9&fontsize=largeFont
  • its annual year-end circuit status report for U.... * [86]Trends in Telephony Service (2007) 02.01.2007 Trends in Telephone Service is published by the Industry Analysis and Technology Division of... * [87]High Speed Services for Internet Access (As of 06/30/06) 01.31.2007 We summarize here information from the fourteenth semi-annual data collection, thereby presenting a... * [88]Telephone Subscribership Report (through July 2006) 01.17.2007 This is the Federal Communications Commissions (FCCs) report on telephone subscribership in... * [89] * [90] * * [91]6 * [92]7 * [93]8 * [94]9 * 10 * [95]11 * [96]12 * [97]13 * [98]14 * * [99] * [100] Connect * [101]Facebook * [102]Twitter * [103]YouTube * [104]Flickr Share this page * Reddit * Digg * Facebook * Twitter
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/fcc2004budget.html?page=9&fontsize=mediumFont
  • its annual year-end circuit status report for U.... * [86]Trends in Telephony Service (2007) 02.01.2007 Trends in Telephone Service is published by the Industry Analysis and Technology Division of... * [87]High Speed Services for Internet Access (As of 06/30/06) 01.31.2007 We summarize here information from the fourteenth semi-annual data collection, thereby presenting a... * [88]Telephone Subscribership Report (through July 2006) 01.17.2007 This is the Federal Communications Commissions (FCCs) report on telephone subscribership in... * [89] * [90] * * [91]6 * [92]7 * [93]8 * [94]9 * 10 * [95]11 * [96]12 * [97]13 * [98]14 * * [99] * [100] Connect * [101]Facebook * [102]Twitter * [103]YouTube * [104]Flickr Share this page * Reddit * Digg * Facebook * Twitter
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/fcc2005budget.html?page=10
  • to Congress as required by the Orbit Act [_] Satellite Competition Reports [_] Section 257 Triennial Reports [_] Section 43.61 International Traffic Data Reports [_] Statistics of Communications Common Carrier Reports [_] Telephone Penetration Reports [_] Telephone Subscribership Reports [_] Trends in Telephony Service [_] Video Competition Reports Apply Filter * [79]Numbering Resource Utilization in the U.S. (As of 12/31/05) 01.17.2007 This is the Federal Communications Commissions report on numbering resource utilization in... * [80]Local Telephone Competition (As of 06/30/06) 01.07.2007 We present here summary statistics of the latest data on local telephone service competition in... * [81]Report on Cable Industry Prices (2005) 12.27.2006 Section 623(k) of the Communications Act, as amended by the Cable Television Consumer ... * [82]Commercial Mobile
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/fcc2005budget.html?page=10&contrast=
  • to Congress as required by the Orbit Act [_] Satellite Competition Reports [_] Section 257 Triennial Reports [_] Section 43.61 International Traffic Data Reports [_] Statistics of Communications Common Carrier Reports [_] Telephone Penetration Reports [_] Telephone Subscribership Reports [_] Trends in Telephony Service [_] Video Competition Reports Apply Filter * [79]Numbering Resource Utilization in the U.S. (As of 12/31/05) 01.17.2007 This is the Federal Communications Commissions report on numbering resource utilization in... * [80]Local Telephone Competition (As of 06/30/06) 01.07.2007 We present here summary statistics of the latest data on local telephone service competition in... * [81]Report on Cable Industry Prices (2005) 12.27.2006 Section 623(k) of the Communications Act, as amended by the Cable Television Consumer ... * [82]Commercial Mobile
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/fcc2005budget.html?page=10&contrast=highContrast
  • to Congress as required by the Orbit Act [_] Satellite Competition Reports [_] Section 257 Triennial Reports [_] Section 43.61 International Traffic Data Reports [_] Statistics of Communications Common Carrier Reports [_] Telephone Penetration Reports [_] Telephone Subscribership Reports [_] Trends in Telephony Service [_] Video Competition Reports Apply Filter * [79]Numbering Resource Utilization in the U.S. (As of 12/31/05) 01.17.2007 This is the Federal Communications Commissions report on numbering resource utilization in... * [80]Local Telephone Competition (As of 06/30/06) 01.07.2007 We present here summary statistics of the latest data on local telephone service competition in... * [81]Report on Cable Industry Prices (2005) 12.27.2006 Section 623(k) of the Communications Act, as amended by the Cable Television Consumer ... * [82]Commercial Mobile
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/fcc2005budget.html?page=10&fontsize=
  • to Congress as required by the Orbit Act [_] Satellite Competition Reports [_] Section 257 Triennial Reports [_] Section 43.61 International Traffic Data Reports [_] Statistics of Communications Common Carrier Reports [_] Telephone Penetration Reports [_] Telephone Subscribership Reports [_] Trends in Telephony Service [_] Video Competition Reports Apply Filter * [79]Numbering Resource Utilization in the U.S. (As of 12/31/05) 01.17.2007 This is the Federal Communications Commissions report on numbering resource utilization in... * [80]Local Telephone Competition (As of 06/30/06) 01.07.2007 We present here summary statistics of the latest data on local telephone service competition in... * [81]Report on Cable Industry Prices (2005) 12.27.2006 Section 623(k) of the Communications Act, as amended by the Cable Television Consumer ... * [82]Commercial Mobile
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/fcc2005budget.html?page=10&fontsize=largeFont
  • to Congress as required by the Orbit Act [_] Satellite Competition Reports [_] Section 257 Triennial Reports [_] Section 43.61 International Traffic Data Reports [_] Statistics of Communications Common Carrier Reports [_] Telephone Penetration Reports [_] Telephone Subscribership Reports [_] Trends in Telephony Service [_] Video Competition Reports Apply Filter * [79]Numbering Resource Utilization in the U.S. (As of 12/31/05) 01.17.2007 This is the Federal Communications Commissions report on numbering resource utilization in... * [80]Local Telephone Competition (As of 06/30/06) 01.07.2007 We present here summary statistics of the latest data on local telephone service competition in... * [81]Report on Cable Industry Prices (2005) 12.27.2006 Section 623(k) of the Communications Act, as amended by the Cable Television Consumer ... * [82]Commercial Mobile
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/fcc2005budget.html?page=10&fontsize=mediumFont
  • to Congress as required by the Orbit Act [_] Satellite Competition Reports [_] Section 257 Triennial Reports [_] Section 43.61 International Traffic Data Reports [_] Statistics of Communications Common Carrier Reports [_] Telephone Penetration Reports [_] Telephone Subscribership Reports [_] Trends in Telephony Service [_] Video Competition Reports Apply Filter * [79]Numbering Resource Utilization in the U.S. (As of 12/31/05) 01.17.2007 This is the Federal Communications Commissions report on numbering resource utilization in... * [80]Local Telephone Competition (As of 06/30/06) 01.07.2007 We present here summary statistics of the latest data on local telephone service competition in... * [81]Report on Cable Industry Prices (2005) 12.27.2006 Section 623(k) of the Communications Act, as amended by the Cable Television Consumer ... * [82]Commercial Mobile
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/fcc2005budget.html?page=18
  • 43.61 International Traffic Data Reports [_] Statistics of Communications Common Carrier Reports [_] Telephone Penetration Reports [_] Telephone Subscribership Reports [_] Trends in Telephony Service [_] Video Competition Reports Apply Filter * [79]Telephone Subscribership Report (through July 2002) 02.12.2003 This is the Federal Communications Commissions (FCCs) report on telephone subscribership in... * [80]Quarterly Inquiries and Complaints Report (1st Qtr, 2003) 01.17.2003 This report tracks the top subject areas for consumer inquiries and complaints received during the... * [81]Quality of Service Report of the Local Operating Companies (2000-2001) 01.03.2003 This report summarizes various kinds of service quality data filed by certain incumbent local... * [82]9th Annual Video Competition Report 12.31.2002 This is the Commissions ninth annual report (2002 Report) to Congress on
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/fcc2005budget.html?page=18&contrast=
  • 43.61 International Traffic Data Reports [_] Statistics of Communications Common Carrier Reports [_] Telephone Penetration Reports [_] Telephone Subscribership Reports [_] Trends in Telephony Service [_] Video Competition Reports Apply Filter * [79]Telephone Subscribership Report (through July 2002) 02.12.2003 This is the Federal Communications Commissions (FCCs) report on telephone subscribership in... * [80]Quarterly Inquiries and Complaints Report (1st Qtr, 2003) 01.17.2003 This report tracks the top subject areas for consumer inquiries and complaints received during the... * [81]Quality of Service Report of the Local Operating Companies (2000-2001) 01.03.2003 This report summarizes various kinds of service quality data filed by certain incumbent local... * [82]9th Annual Video Competition Report 12.31.2002 This is the Commissions ninth annual report (2002 Report) to Congress on
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/fcc2005budget.html?page=18&contrast=highContrast
  • 43.61 International Traffic Data Reports [_] Statistics of Communications Common Carrier Reports [_] Telephone Penetration Reports [_] Telephone Subscribership Reports [_] Trends in Telephony Service [_] Video Competition Reports Apply Filter * [79]Telephone Subscribership Report (through July 2002) 02.12.2003 This is the Federal Communications Commissions (FCCs) report on telephone subscribership in... * [80]Quarterly Inquiries and Complaints Report (1st Qtr, 2003) 01.17.2003 This report tracks the top subject areas for consumer inquiries and complaints received during the... * [81]Quality of Service Report of the Local Operating Companies (2000-2001) 01.03.2003 This report summarizes various kinds of service quality data filed by certain incumbent local... * [82]9th Annual Video Competition Report 12.31.2002 This is the Commissions ninth annual report (2002 Report) to Congress on
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/fcc2005budget.html?page=18&fontsize=
  • 43.61 International Traffic Data Reports [_] Statistics of Communications Common Carrier Reports [_] Telephone Penetration Reports [_] Telephone Subscribership Reports [_] Trends in Telephony Service [_] Video Competition Reports Apply Filter * [79]Telephone Subscribership Report (through July 2002) 02.12.2003 This is the Federal Communications Commissions (FCCs) report on telephone subscribership in... * [80]Quarterly Inquiries and Complaints Report (1st Qtr, 2003) 01.17.2003 This report tracks the top subject areas for consumer inquiries and complaints received during the... * [81]Quality of Service Report of the Local Operating Companies (2000-2001) 01.03.2003 This report summarizes various kinds of service quality data filed by certain incumbent local... * [82]9th Annual Video Competition Report 12.31.2002 This is the Commissions ninth annual report (2002 Report) to Congress on
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/fcc2005budget.html?page=18&fontsize=largeFont
  • 43.61 International Traffic Data Reports [_] Statistics of Communications Common Carrier Reports [_] Telephone Penetration Reports [_] Telephone Subscribership Reports [_] Trends in Telephony Service [_] Video Competition Reports Apply Filter * [79]Telephone Subscribership Report (through July 2002) 02.12.2003 This is the Federal Communications Commissions (FCCs) report on telephone subscribership in... * [80]Quarterly Inquiries and Complaints Report (1st Qtr, 2003) 01.17.2003 This report tracks the top subject areas for consumer inquiries and complaints received during the... * [81]Quality of Service Report of the Local Operating Companies (2000-2001) 01.03.2003 This report summarizes various kinds of service quality data filed by certain incumbent local... * [82]9th Annual Video Competition Report 12.31.2002 This is the Commissions ninth annual report (2002 Report) to Congress on
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/fcc2005budget.html?page=18&fontsize=mediumFont
  • 43.61 International Traffic Data Reports [_] Statistics of Communications Common Carrier Reports [_] Telephone Penetration Reports [_] Telephone Subscribership Reports [_] Trends in Telephony Service [_] Video Competition Reports Apply Filter * [79]Telephone Subscribership Report (through July 2002) 02.12.2003 This is the Federal Communications Commissions (FCCs) report on telephone subscribership in... * [80]Quarterly Inquiries and Complaints Report (1st Qtr, 2003) 01.17.2003 This report tracks the top subject areas for consumer inquiries and complaints received during the... * [81]Quality of Service Report of the Local Operating Companies (2000-2001) 01.03.2003 This report summarizes various kinds of service quality data filed by certain incumbent local... * [82]9th Annual Video Competition Report 12.31.2002 This is the Commissions ninth annual report (2002 Report) to Congress on
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/fcc2005budget.html?page=20
  • (FCCs) report on telephone subscribership in the... * [81]Third Broadband Progress Report 02.07.2002 The FCC released its third report on the availability of advanced telecommunications capability... * [82]High Speed Services for Internet Access (As of 06/30/01) 02.01.2002 We summarize here information from the fourth data collection, thereby presenting a snapshot of... * [83]Quarterly Inquiries and Complaints Report (1st Qtr, 2002) 01.17.2002 This report tracks the top subject areas for consumer inquiries and complaints received during the... * [84]8th Annual Video Competition Report 01.14.2002 This is the Commissions eighth annual report (2001 Report) to Congress on the status of ... * [85]Quality of Service Report of the Local Operating Companies (1999-2000) 12.05.2001 This report summarizes various kinds of service quality data filed
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/fcc2005budget.html?page=20&contrast=
  • (FCCs) report on telephone subscribership in the... * [81]Third Broadband Progress Report 02.07.2002 The FCC released its third report on the availability of advanced telecommunications capability... * [82]High Speed Services for Internet Access (As of 06/30/01) 02.01.2002 We summarize here information from the fourth data collection, thereby presenting a snapshot of... * [83]Quarterly Inquiries and Complaints Report (1st Qtr, 2002) 01.17.2002 This report tracks the top subject areas for consumer inquiries and complaints received during the... * [84]8th Annual Video Competition Report 01.14.2002 This is the Commissions eighth annual report (2001 Report) to Congress on the status of ... * [85]Quality of Service Report of the Local Operating Companies (1999-2000) 12.05.2001 This report summarizes various kinds of service quality data filed
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/fcc2005budget.html?page=20&contrast=highContrast
  • (FCCs) report on telephone subscribership in the... * [81]Third Broadband Progress Report 02.07.2002 The FCC released its third report on the availability of advanced telecommunications capability... * [82]High Speed Services for Internet Access (As of 06/30/01) 02.01.2002 We summarize here information from the fourth data collection, thereby presenting a snapshot of... * [83]Quarterly Inquiries and Complaints Report (1st Qtr, 2002) 01.17.2002 This report tracks the top subject areas for consumer inquiries and complaints received during the... * [84]8th Annual Video Competition Report 01.14.2002 This is the Commissions eighth annual report (2001 Report) to Congress on the status of ... * [85]Quality of Service Report of the Local Operating Companies (1999-2000) 12.05.2001 This report summarizes various kinds of service quality data filed
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/fcc2005budget.html?page=20&fontsize=
  • (FCCs) report on telephone subscribership in the... * [81]Third Broadband Progress Report 02.07.2002 The FCC released its third report on the availability of advanced telecommunications capability... * [82]High Speed Services for Internet Access (As of 06/30/01) 02.01.2002 We summarize here information from the fourth data collection, thereby presenting a snapshot of... * [83]Quarterly Inquiries and Complaints Report (1st Qtr, 2002) 01.17.2002 This report tracks the top subject areas for consumer inquiries and complaints received during the... * [84]8th Annual Video Competition Report 01.14.2002 This is the Commissions eighth annual report (2001 Report) to Congress on the status of ... * [85]Quality of Service Report of the Local Operating Companies (1999-2000) 12.05.2001 This report summarizes various kinds of service quality data filed
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/fcc2005budget.html?page=20&fontsize=largeFont
  • (FCCs) report on telephone subscribership in the... * [81]Third Broadband Progress Report 02.07.2002 The FCC released its third report on the availability of advanced telecommunications capability... * [82]High Speed Services for Internet Access (As of 06/30/01) 02.01.2002 We summarize here information from the fourth data collection, thereby presenting a snapshot of... * [83]Quarterly Inquiries and Complaints Report (1st Qtr, 2002) 01.17.2002 This report tracks the top subject areas for consumer inquiries and complaints received during the... * [84]8th Annual Video Competition Report 01.14.2002 This is the Commissions eighth annual report (2001 Report) to Congress on the status of ... * [85]Quality of Service Report of the Local Operating Companies (1999-2000) 12.05.2001 This report summarizes various kinds of service quality data filed
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/fcc2005budget.html?page=20&fontsize=mediumFont
  • (FCCs) report on telephone subscribership in the... * [81]Third Broadband Progress Report 02.07.2002 The FCC released its third report on the availability of advanced telecommunications capability... * [82]High Speed Services for Internet Access (As of 06/30/01) 02.01.2002 We summarize here information from the fourth data collection, thereby presenting a snapshot of... * [83]Quarterly Inquiries and Complaints Report (1st Qtr, 2002) 01.17.2002 This report tracks the top subject areas for consumer inquiries and complaints received during the... * [84]8th Annual Video Competition Report 01.14.2002 This is the Commissions eighth annual report (2001 Report) to Congress on the status of ... * [85]Quality of Service Report of the Local Operating Companies (1999-2000) 12.05.2001 This report summarizes various kinds of service quality data filed
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/fcc2005budget.html?page=4
  • 43.61 International Traffic Data Reports [_] Statistics of Communications Common Carrier Reports [_] Telephone Penetration Reports [_] Telephone Subscribership Reports [_] Trends in Telephony Service [_] Video Competition Reports Apply Filter * [79]Telephone Subscribership Report (through November 2009) 02.02.2010 This is the Federal Communications Commissions (FCCs) report on telephone subscribership in... * [80]Quarterly Inquiries and Complaints Report (1st Qtr, 2010) 01.17.2010 This report tracks the top subject areas for consumer inquiries and complaints received during the... * [81]Quality of Service Report of the Local Operating Companies (2007-2008) 12.24.2009 This report summarizes the Automated Reporting Management Information System (ARMIS) service... * [82]Telephone Subscribership Report (through July 2009) 12.15.2009 This is the Federal Communications Commissions (FCCs) report on telephone subscribership in... * [83]Quarterly
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/fcc2005budget.html?page=4&contrast=
  • 43.61 International Traffic Data Reports [_] Statistics of Communications Common Carrier Reports [_] Telephone Penetration Reports [_] Telephone Subscribership Reports [_] Trends in Telephony Service [_] Video Competition Reports Apply Filter * [79]Telephone Subscribership Report (through November 2009) 02.02.2010 This is the Federal Communications Commissions (FCCs) report on telephone subscribership in... * [80]Quarterly Inquiries and Complaints Report (1st Qtr, 2010) 01.17.2010 This report tracks the top subject areas for consumer inquiries and complaints received during the... * [81]Quality of Service Report of the Local Operating Companies (2007-2008) 12.24.2009 This report summarizes the Automated Reporting Management Information System (ARMIS) service... * [82]Telephone Subscribership Report (through July 2009) 12.15.2009 This is the Federal Communications Commissions (FCCs) report on telephone subscribership in... * [83]Quarterly
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/fcc2005budget.html?page=4&contrast=highContrast
  • 43.61 International Traffic Data Reports [_] Statistics of Communications Common Carrier Reports [_] Telephone Penetration Reports [_] Telephone Subscribership Reports [_] Trends in Telephony Service [_] Video Competition Reports Apply Filter * [79]Telephone Subscribership Report (through November 2009) 02.02.2010 This is the Federal Communications Commissions (FCCs) report on telephone subscribership in... * [80]Quarterly Inquiries and Complaints Report (1st Qtr, 2010) 01.17.2010 This report tracks the top subject areas for consumer inquiries and complaints received during the... * [81]Quality of Service Report of the Local Operating Companies (2007-2008) 12.24.2009 This report summarizes the Automated Reporting Management Information System (ARMIS) service... * [82]Telephone Subscribership Report (through July 2009) 12.15.2009 This is the Federal Communications Commissions (FCCs) report on telephone subscribership in... * [83]Quarterly
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/fcc2005budget.html?page=4&fontsize=
  • 43.61 International Traffic Data Reports [_] Statistics of Communications Common Carrier Reports [_] Telephone Penetration Reports [_] Telephone Subscribership Reports [_] Trends in Telephony Service [_] Video Competition Reports Apply Filter * [79]Telephone Subscribership Report (through November 2009) 02.02.2010 This is the Federal Communications Commissions (FCCs) report on telephone subscribership in... * [80]Quarterly Inquiries and Complaints Report (1st Qtr, 2010) 01.17.2010 This report tracks the top subject areas for consumer inquiries and complaints received during the... * [81]Quality of Service Report of the Local Operating Companies (2007-2008) 12.24.2009 This report summarizes the Automated Reporting Management Information System (ARMIS) service... * [82]Telephone Subscribership Report (through July 2009) 12.15.2009 This is the Federal Communications Commissions (FCCs) report on telephone subscribership in... * [83]Quarterly
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/fcc2005budget.html?page=4&fontsize=largeFont
  • 43.61 International Traffic Data Reports [_] Statistics of Communications Common Carrier Reports [_] Telephone Penetration Reports [_] Telephone Subscribership Reports [_] Trends in Telephony Service [_] Video Competition Reports Apply Filter * [79]Telephone Subscribership Report (through November 2009) 02.02.2010 This is the Federal Communications Commissions (FCCs) report on telephone subscribership in... * [80]Quarterly Inquiries and Complaints Report (1st Qtr, 2010) 01.17.2010 This report tracks the top subject areas for consumer inquiries and complaints received during the... * [81]Quality of Service Report of the Local Operating Companies (2007-2008) 12.24.2009 This report summarizes the Automated Reporting Management Information System (ARMIS) service... * [82]Telephone Subscribership Report (through July 2009) 12.15.2009 This is the Federal Communications Commissions (FCCs) report on telephone subscribership in... * [83]Quarterly
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/fcc2005budget.html?page=4&fontsize=mediumFont
  • 43.61 International Traffic Data Reports [_] Statistics of Communications Common Carrier Reports [_] Telephone Penetration Reports [_] Telephone Subscribership Reports [_] Trends in Telephony Service [_] Video Competition Reports Apply Filter * [79]Telephone Subscribership Report (through November 2009) 02.02.2010 This is the Federal Communications Commissions (FCCs) report on telephone subscribership in... * [80]Quarterly Inquiries and Complaints Report (1st Qtr, 2010) 01.17.2010 This report tracks the top subject areas for consumer inquiries and complaints received during the... * [81]Quality of Service Report of the Local Operating Companies (2007-2008) 12.24.2009 This report summarizes the Automated Reporting Management Information System (ARMIS) service... * [82]Telephone Subscribership Report (through July 2009) 12.15.2009 This is the Federal Communications Commissions (FCCs) report on telephone subscribership in... * [83]Quarterly
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/fcc2005budget.html?page=9
  • its annual year-end circuit status report for U.... * [86]Trends in Telephony Service (2007) 02.01.2007 Trends in Telephone Service is published by the Industry Analysis and Technology Division of... * [87]High Speed Services for Internet Access (As of 06/30/06) 01.31.2007 We summarize here information from the fourteenth semi-annual data collection, thereby presenting a... * [88]Telephone Subscribership Report (through July 2006) 01.17.2007 This is the Federal Communications Commissions (FCCs) report on telephone subscribership in... * [89] * [90] * * [91]6 * [92]7 * [93]8 * [94]9 * 10 * [95]11 * [96]12 * [97]13 * [98]14 * * [99] * [100] Connect * [101]Facebook * [102]Twitter * [103]YouTube * [104]Flickr Share this page * Reddit * Digg * Facebook * Twitter
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/fcc2005budget.html?page=9&contrast=
  • its annual year-end circuit status report for U.... * [86]Trends in Telephony Service (2007) 02.01.2007 Trends in Telephone Service is published by the Industry Analysis and Technology Division of... * [87]High Speed Services for Internet Access (As of 06/30/06) 01.31.2007 We summarize here information from the fourteenth semi-annual data collection, thereby presenting a... * [88]Telephone Subscribership Report (through July 2006) 01.17.2007 This is the Federal Communications Commissions (FCCs) report on telephone subscribership in... * [89] * [90] * * [91]6 * [92]7 * [93]8 * [94]9 * 10 * [95]11 * [96]12 * [97]13 * [98]14 * * [99] * [100] Connect * [101]Facebook * [102]Twitter * [103]YouTube * [104]Flickr Share this page * Reddit * Digg * Facebook * Twitter
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/fcc2005budget.html?page=9&contrast=highContrast
  • its annual year-end circuit status report for U.... * [86]Trends in Telephony Service (2007) 02.01.2007 Trends in Telephone Service is published by the Industry Analysis and Technology Division of... * [87]High Speed Services for Internet Access (As of 06/30/06) 01.31.2007 We summarize here information from the fourteenth semi-annual data collection, thereby presenting a... * [88]Telephone Subscribership Report (through July 2006) 01.17.2007 This is the Federal Communications Commissions (FCCs) report on telephone subscribership in... * [89] * [90] * * [91]6 * [92]7 * [93]8 * [94]9 * 10 * [95]11 * [96]12 * [97]13 * [98]14 * * [99] * [100] Connect * [101]Facebook * [102]Twitter * [103]YouTube * [104]Flickr Share this page * Reddit * Digg * Facebook * Twitter
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/fcc2005budget.html?page=9&fontsize=
  • its annual year-end circuit status report for U.... * [86]Trends in Telephony Service (2007) 02.01.2007 Trends in Telephone Service is published by the Industry Analysis and Technology Division of... * [87]High Speed Services for Internet Access (As of 06/30/06) 01.31.2007 We summarize here information from the fourteenth semi-annual data collection, thereby presenting a... * [88]Telephone Subscribership Report (through July 2006) 01.17.2007 This is the Federal Communications Commissions (FCCs) report on telephone subscribership in... * [89] * [90] * * [91]6 * [92]7 * [93]8 * [94]9 * 10 * [95]11 * [96]12 * [97]13 * [98]14 * * [99] * [100] Connect * [101]Facebook * [102]Twitter * [103]YouTube * [104]Flickr Share this page * Reddit * Digg * Facebook * Twitter
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/fcc2005budget.html?page=9&fontsize=largeFont
  • its annual year-end circuit status report for U.... * [86]Trends in Telephony Service (2007) 02.01.2007 Trends in Telephone Service is published by the Industry Analysis and Technology Division of... * [87]High Speed Services for Internet Access (As of 06/30/06) 01.31.2007 We summarize here information from the fourteenth semi-annual data collection, thereby presenting a... * [88]Telephone Subscribership Report (through July 2006) 01.17.2007 This is the Federal Communications Commissions (FCCs) report on telephone subscribership in... * [89] * [90] * * [91]6 * [92]7 * [93]8 * [94]9 * 10 * [95]11 * [96]12 * [97]13 * [98]14 * * [99] * [100] Connect * [101]Facebook * [102]Twitter * [103]YouTube * [104]Flickr Share this page * Reddit * Digg * Facebook * Twitter
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/fcc2005budget.html?page=9&fontsize=mediumFont
  • its annual year-end circuit status report for U.... * [86]Trends in Telephony Service (2007) 02.01.2007 Trends in Telephone Service is published by the Industry Analysis and Technology Division of... * [87]High Speed Services for Internet Access (As of 06/30/06) 01.31.2007 We summarize here information from the fourteenth semi-annual data collection, thereby presenting a... * [88]Telephone Subscribership Report (through July 2006) 01.17.2007 This is the Federal Communications Commissions (FCCs) report on telephone subscribership in... * [89] * [90] * * [91]6 * [92]7 * [93]8 * [94]9 * 10 * [95]11 * [96]12 * [97]13 * [98]14 * * [99] * [100] Connect * [101]Facebook * [102]Twitter * [103]YouTube * [104]Flickr Share this page * Reddit * Digg * Facebook * Twitter
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/fcc2006budget.html?page=10
  • to Congress as required by the Orbit Act [_] Satellite Competition Reports [_] Section 257 Triennial Reports [_] Section 43.61 International Traffic Data Reports [_] Statistics of Communications Common Carrier Reports [_] Telephone Penetration Reports [_] Telephone Subscribership Reports [_] Trends in Telephony Service [_] Video Competition Reports Apply Filter * [79]Numbering Resource Utilization in the U.S. (As of 12/31/05) 01.17.2007 This is the Federal Communications Commissions report on numbering resource utilization in... * [80]Local Telephone Competition (As of 06/30/06) 01.07.2007 We present here summary statistics of the latest data on local telephone service competition in... * [81]Report on Cable Industry Prices (2005) 12.27.2006 Section 623(k) of the Communications Act, as amended by the Cable Television Consumer ... * [82]Commercial Mobile
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/fcc2006budget.html?page=10&contrast=
  • to Congress as required by the Orbit Act [_] Satellite Competition Reports [_] Section 257 Triennial Reports [_] Section 43.61 International Traffic Data Reports [_] Statistics of Communications Common Carrier Reports [_] Telephone Penetration Reports [_] Telephone Subscribership Reports [_] Trends in Telephony Service [_] Video Competition Reports Apply Filter * [79]Numbering Resource Utilization in the U.S. (As of 12/31/05) 01.17.2007 This is the Federal Communications Commissions report on numbering resource utilization in... * [80]Local Telephone Competition (As of 06/30/06) 01.07.2007 We present here summary statistics of the latest data on local telephone service competition in... * [81]Report on Cable Industry Prices (2005) 12.27.2006 Section 623(k) of the Communications Act, as amended by the Cable Television Consumer ... * [82]Commercial Mobile
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/fcc2006budget.html?page=10&contrast=highContrast
  • to Congress as required by the Orbit Act [_] Satellite Competition Reports [_] Section 257 Triennial Reports [_] Section 43.61 International Traffic Data Reports [_] Statistics of Communications Common Carrier Reports [_] Telephone Penetration Reports [_] Telephone Subscribership Reports [_] Trends in Telephony Service [_] Video Competition Reports Apply Filter * [79]Numbering Resource Utilization in the U.S. (As of 12/31/05) 01.17.2007 This is the Federal Communications Commissions report on numbering resource utilization in... * [80]Local Telephone Competition (As of 06/30/06) 01.07.2007 We present here summary statistics of the latest data on local telephone service competition in... * [81]Report on Cable Industry Prices (2005) 12.27.2006 Section 623(k) of the Communications Act, as amended by the Cable Television Consumer ... * [82]Commercial Mobile
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/fcc2006budget.html?page=10&fontsize=
  • to Congress as required by the Orbit Act [_] Satellite Competition Reports [_] Section 257 Triennial Reports [_] Section 43.61 International Traffic Data Reports [_] Statistics of Communications Common Carrier Reports [_] Telephone Penetration Reports [_] Telephone Subscribership Reports [_] Trends in Telephony Service [_] Video Competition Reports Apply Filter * [79]Numbering Resource Utilization in the U.S. (As of 12/31/05) 01.17.2007 This is the Federal Communications Commissions report on numbering resource utilization in... * [80]Local Telephone Competition (As of 06/30/06) 01.07.2007 We present here summary statistics of the latest data on local telephone service competition in... * [81]Report on Cable Industry Prices (2005) 12.27.2006 Section 623(k) of the Communications Act, as amended by the Cable Television Consumer ... * [82]Commercial Mobile
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/fcc2006budget.html?page=10&fontsize=largeFont
  • to Congress as required by the Orbit Act [_] Satellite Competition Reports [_] Section 257 Triennial Reports [_] Section 43.61 International Traffic Data Reports [_] Statistics of Communications Common Carrier Reports [_] Telephone Penetration Reports [_] Telephone Subscribership Reports [_] Trends in Telephony Service [_] Video Competition Reports Apply Filter * [79]Numbering Resource Utilization in the U.S. (As of 12/31/05) 01.17.2007 This is the Federal Communications Commissions report on numbering resource utilization in... * [80]Local Telephone Competition (As of 06/30/06) 01.07.2007 We present here summary statistics of the latest data on local telephone service competition in... * [81]Report on Cable Industry Prices (2005) 12.27.2006 Section 623(k) of the Communications Act, as amended by the Cable Television Consumer ... * [82]Commercial Mobile
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/fcc2006budget.html?page=10&fontsize=mediumFont
  • to Congress as required by the Orbit Act [_] Satellite Competition Reports [_] Section 257 Triennial Reports [_] Section 43.61 International Traffic Data Reports [_] Statistics of Communications Common Carrier Reports [_] Telephone Penetration Reports [_] Telephone Subscribership Reports [_] Trends in Telephony Service [_] Video Competition Reports Apply Filter * [79]Numbering Resource Utilization in the U.S. (As of 12/31/05) 01.17.2007 This is the Federal Communications Commissions report on numbering resource utilization in... * [80]Local Telephone Competition (As of 06/30/06) 01.07.2007 We present here summary statistics of the latest data on local telephone service competition in... * [81]Report on Cable Industry Prices (2005) 12.27.2006 Section 623(k) of the Communications Act, as amended by the Cable Television Consumer ... * [82]Commercial Mobile
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/fcc2006budget.html?page=18
  • 43.61 International Traffic Data Reports [_] Statistics of Communications Common Carrier Reports [_] Telephone Penetration Reports [_] Telephone Subscribership Reports [_] Trends in Telephony Service [_] Video Competition Reports Apply Filter * [79]Telephone Subscribership Report (through July 2002) 02.12.2003 This is the Federal Communications Commissions (FCCs) report on telephone subscribership in... * [80]Quarterly Inquiries and Complaints Report (1st Qtr, 2003) 01.17.2003 This report tracks the top subject areas for consumer inquiries and complaints received during the... * [81]Quality of Service Report of the Local Operating Companies (2000-2001) 01.03.2003 This report summarizes various kinds of service quality data filed by certain incumbent local... * [82]9th Annual Video Competition Report 12.31.2002 This is the Commissions ninth annual report (2002 Report) to Congress on
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/fcc2006budget.html?page=18&contrast=
  • 43.61 International Traffic Data Reports [_] Statistics of Communications Common Carrier Reports [_] Telephone Penetration Reports [_] Telephone Subscribership Reports [_] Trends in Telephony Service [_] Video Competition Reports Apply Filter * [79]Telephone Subscribership Report (through July 2002) 02.12.2003 This is the Federal Communications Commissions (FCCs) report on telephone subscribership in... * [80]Quarterly Inquiries and Complaints Report (1st Qtr, 2003) 01.17.2003 This report tracks the top subject areas for consumer inquiries and complaints received during the... * [81]Quality of Service Report of the Local Operating Companies (2000-2001) 01.03.2003 This report summarizes various kinds of service quality data filed by certain incumbent local... * [82]9th Annual Video Competition Report 12.31.2002 This is the Commissions ninth annual report (2002 Report) to Congress on
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/fcc2006budget.html?page=18&contrast=highContrast
  • 43.61 International Traffic Data Reports [_] Statistics of Communications Common Carrier Reports [_] Telephone Penetration Reports [_] Telephone Subscribership Reports [_] Trends in Telephony Service [_] Video Competition Reports Apply Filter * [79]Telephone Subscribership Report (through July 2002) 02.12.2003 This is the Federal Communications Commissions (FCCs) report on telephone subscribership in... * [80]Quarterly Inquiries and Complaints Report (1st Qtr, 2003) 01.17.2003 This report tracks the top subject areas for consumer inquiries and complaints received during the... * [81]Quality of Service Report of the Local Operating Companies (2000-2001) 01.03.2003 This report summarizes various kinds of service quality data filed by certain incumbent local... * [82]9th Annual Video Competition Report 12.31.2002 This is the Commissions ninth annual report (2002 Report) to Congress on
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/fcc2006budget.html?page=18&fontsize=
  • 43.61 International Traffic Data Reports [_] Statistics of Communications Common Carrier Reports [_] Telephone Penetration Reports [_] Telephone Subscribership Reports [_] Trends in Telephony Service [_] Video Competition Reports Apply Filter * [79]Telephone Subscribership Report (through July 2002) 02.12.2003 This is the Federal Communications Commissions (FCCs) report on telephone subscribership in... * [80]Quarterly Inquiries and Complaints Report (1st Qtr, 2003) 01.17.2003 This report tracks the top subject areas for consumer inquiries and complaints received during the... * [81]Quality of Service Report of the Local Operating Companies (2000-2001) 01.03.2003 This report summarizes various kinds of service quality data filed by certain incumbent local... * [82]9th Annual Video Competition Report 12.31.2002 This is the Commissions ninth annual report (2002 Report) to Congress on
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/fcc2006budget.html?page=18&fontsize=largeFont
  • 43.61 International Traffic Data Reports [_] Statistics of Communications Common Carrier Reports [_] Telephone Penetration Reports [_] Telephone Subscribership Reports [_] Trends in Telephony Service [_] Video Competition Reports Apply Filter * [79]Telephone Subscribership Report (through July 2002) 02.12.2003 This is the Federal Communications Commissions (FCCs) report on telephone subscribership in... * [80]Quarterly Inquiries and Complaints Report (1st Qtr, 2003) 01.17.2003 This report tracks the top subject areas for consumer inquiries and complaints received during the... * [81]Quality of Service Report of the Local Operating Companies (2000-2001) 01.03.2003 This report summarizes various kinds of service quality data filed by certain incumbent local... * [82]9th Annual Video Competition Report 12.31.2002 This is the Commissions ninth annual report (2002 Report) to Congress on
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/fcc2006budget.html?page=18&fontsize=mediumFont
  • 43.61 International Traffic Data Reports [_] Statistics of Communications Common Carrier Reports [_] Telephone Penetration Reports [_] Telephone Subscribership Reports [_] Trends in Telephony Service [_] Video Competition Reports Apply Filter * [79]Telephone Subscribership Report (through July 2002) 02.12.2003 This is the Federal Communications Commissions (FCCs) report on telephone subscribership in... * [80]Quarterly Inquiries and Complaints Report (1st Qtr, 2003) 01.17.2003 This report tracks the top subject areas for consumer inquiries and complaints received during the... * [81]Quality of Service Report of the Local Operating Companies (2000-2001) 01.03.2003 This report summarizes various kinds of service quality data filed by certain incumbent local... * [82]9th Annual Video Competition Report 12.31.2002 This is the Commissions ninth annual report (2002 Report) to Congress on
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/fcc2006budget.html?page=20
  • (FCCs) report on telephone subscribership in the... * [81]Third Broadband Progress Report 02.07.2002 The FCC released its third report on the availability of advanced telecommunications capability... * [82]High Speed Services for Internet Access (As of 06/30/01) 02.01.2002 We summarize here information from the fourth data collection, thereby presenting a snapshot of... * [83]Quarterly Inquiries and Complaints Report (1st Qtr, 2002) 01.17.2002 This report tracks the top subject areas for consumer inquiries and complaints received during the... * [84]8th Annual Video Competition Report 01.14.2002 This is the Commissions eighth annual report (2001 Report) to Congress on the status of ... * [85]Quality of Service Report of the Local Operating Companies (1999-2000) 12.05.2001 This report summarizes various kinds of service quality data filed
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/fcc2006budget.html?page=20&contrast=
  • (FCCs) report on telephone subscribership in the... * [81]Third Broadband Progress Report 02.07.2002 The FCC released its third report on the availability of advanced telecommunications capability... * [82]High Speed Services for Internet Access (As of 06/30/01) 02.01.2002 We summarize here information from the fourth data collection, thereby presenting a snapshot of... * [83]Quarterly Inquiries and Complaints Report (1st Qtr, 2002) 01.17.2002 This report tracks the top subject areas for consumer inquiries and complaints received during the... * [84]8th Annual Video Competition Report 01.14.2002 This is the Commissions eighth annual report (2001 Report) to Congress on the status of ... * [85]Quality of Service Report of the Local Operating Companies (1999-2000) 12.05.2001 This report summarizes various kinds of service quality data filed
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/fcc2006budget.html?page=20&contrast=highContrast
  • (FCCs) report on telephone subscribership in the... * [81]Third Broadband Progress Report 02.07.2002 The FCC released its third report on the availability of advanced telecommunications capability... * [82]High Speed Services for Internet Access (As of 06/30/01) 02.01.2002 We summarize here information from the fourth data collection, thereby presenting a snapshot of... * [83]Quarterly Inquiries and Complaints Report (1st Qtr, 2002) 01.17.2002 This report tracks the top subject areas for consumer inquiries and complaints received during the... * [84]8th Annual Video Competition Report 01.14.2002 This is the Commissions eighth annual report (2001 Report) to Congress on the status of ... * [85]Quality of Service Report of the Local Operating Companies (1999-2000) 12.05.2001 This report summarizes various kinds of service quality data filed
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/fcc2006budget.html?page=20&fontsize=
  • (FCCs) report on telephone subscribership in the... * [81]Third Broadband Progress Report 02.07.2002 The FCC released its third report on the availability of advanced telecommunications capability... * [82]High Speed Services for Internet Access (As of 06/30/01) 02.01.2002 We summarize here information from the fourth data collection, thereby presenting a snapshot of... * [83]Quarterly Inquiries and Complaints Report (1st Qtr, 2002) 01.17.2002 This report tracks the top subject areas for consumer inquiries and complaints received during the... * [84]8th Annual Video Competition Report 01.14.2002 This is the Commissions eighth annual report (2001 Report) to Congress on the status of ... * [85]Quality of Service Report of the Local Operating Companies (1999-2000) 12.05.2001 This report summarizes various kinds of service quality data filed
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/fcc2006budget.html?page=20&fontsize=largeFont
  • (FCCs) report on telephone subscribership in the... * [81]Third Broadband Progress Report 02.07.2002 The FCC released its third report on the availability of advanced telecommunications capability... * [82]High Speed Services for Internet Access (As of 06/30/01) 02.01.2002 We summarize here information from the fourth data collection, thereby presenting a snapshot of... * [83]Quarterly Inquiries and Complaints Report (1st Qtr, 2002) 01.17.2002 This report tracks the top subject areas for consumer inquiries and complaints received during the... * [84]8th Annual Video Competition Report 01.14.2002 This is the Commissions eighth annual report (2001 Report) to Congress on the status of ... * [85]Quality of Service Report of the Local Operating Companies (1999-2000) 12.05.2001 This report summarizes various kinds of service quality data filed
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/fcc2006budget.html?page=20&fontsize=mediumFont
  • (FCCs) report on telephone subscribership in the... * [81]Third Broadband Progress Report 02.07.2002 The FCC released its third report on the availability of advanced telecommunications capability... * [82]High Speed Services for Internet Access (As of 06/30/01) 02.01.2002 We summarize here information from the fourth data collection, thereby presenting a snapshot of... * [83]Quarterly Inquiries and Complaints Report (1st Qtr, 2002) 01.17.2002 This report tracks the top subject areas for consumer inquiries and complaints received during the... * [84]8th Annual Video Competition Report 01.14.2002 This is the Commissions eighth annual report (2001 Report) to Congress on the status of ... * [85]Quality of Service Report of the Local Operating Companies (1999-2000) 12.05.2001 This report summarizes various kinds of service quality data filed
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/fcc2006budget.html?page=4
  • 43.61 International Traffic Data Reports [_] Statistics of Communications Common Carrier Reports [_] Telephone Penetration Reports [_] Telephone Subscribership Reports [_] Trends in Telephony Service [_] Video Competition Reports Apply Filter * [79]Telephone Subscribership Report (through November 2009) 02.02.2010 This is the Federal Communications Commissions (FCCs) report on telephone subscribership in... * [80]Quarterly Inquiries and Complaints Report (1st Qtr, 2010) 01.17.2010 This report tracks the top subject areas for consumer inquiries and complaints received during the... * [81]Quality of Service Report of the Local Operating Companies (2007-2008) 12.24.2009 This report summarizes the Automated Reporting Management Information System (ARMIS) service... * [82]Telephone Subscribership Report (through July 2009) 12.15.2009 This is the Federal Communications Commissions (FCCs) report on telephone subscribership in... * [83]Quarterly
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/fcc2006budget.html?page=4&contrast=
  • 43.61 International Traffic Data Reports [_] Statistics of Communications Common Carrier Reports [_] Telephone Penetration Reports [_] Telephone Subscribership Reports [_] Trends in Telephony Service [_] Video Competition Reports Apply Filter * [79]Telephone Subscribership Report (through November 2009) 02.02.2010 This is the Federal Communications Commissions (FCCs) report on telephone subscribership in... * [80]Quarterly Inquiries and Complaints Report (1st Qtr, 2010) 01.17.2010 This report tracks the top subject areas for consumer inquiries and complaints received during the... * [81]Quality of Service Report of the Local Operating Companies (2007-2008) 12.24.2009 This report summarizes the Automated Reporting Management Information System (ARMIS) service... * [82]Telephone Subscribership Report (through July 2009) 12.15.2009 This is the Federal Communications Commissions (FCCs) report on telephone subscribership in... * [83]Quarterly
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/fcc2006budget.html?page=4&contrast=highContrast
  • 43.61 International Traffic Data Reports [_] Statistics of Communications Common Carrier Reports [_] Telephone Penetration Reports [_] Telephone Subscribership Reports [_] Trends in Telephony Service [_] Video Competition Reports Apply Filter * [79]Telephone Subscribership Report (through November 2009) 02.02.2010 This is the Federal Communications Commissions (FCCs) report on telephone subscribership in... * [80]Quarterly Inquiries and Complaints Report (1st Qtr, 2010) 01.17.2010 This report tracks the top subject areas for consumer inquiries and complaints received during the... * [81]Quality of Service Report of the Local Operating Companies (2007-2008) 12.24.2009 This report summarizes the Automated Reporting Management Information System (ARMIS) service... * [82]Telephone Subscribership Report (through July 2009) 12.15.2009 This is the Federal Communications Commissions (FCCs) report on telephone subscribership in... * [83]Quarterly
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/fcc2006budget.html?page=4&fontsize=
  • 43.61 International Traffic Data Reports [_] Statistics of Communications Common Carrier Reports [_] Telephone Penetration Reports [_] Telephone Subscribership Reports [_] Trends in Telephony Service [_] Video Competition Reports Apply Filter * [79]Telephone Subscribership Report (through November 2009) 02.02.2010 This is the Federal Communications Commissions (FCCs) report on telephone subscribership in... * [80]Quarterly Inquiries and Complaints Report (1st Qtr, 2010) 01.17.2010 This report tracks the top subject areas for consumer inquiries and complaints received during the... * [81]Quality of Service Report of the Local Operating Companies (2007-2008) 12.24.2009 This report summarizes the Automated Reporting Management Information System (ARMIS) service... * [82]Telephone Subscribership Report (through July 2009) 12.15.2009 This is the Federal Communications Commissions (FCCs) report on telephone subscribership in... * [83]Quarterly
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/fcc2006budget.html?page=4&fontsize=largeFont
  • 43.61 International Traffic Data Reports [_] Statistics of Communications Common Carrier Reports [_] Telephone Penetration Reports [_] Telephone Subscribership Reports [_] Trends in Telephony Service [_] Video Competition Reports Apply Filter * [79]Telephone Subscribership Report (through November 2009) 02.02.2010 This is the Federal Communications Commissions (FCCs) report on telephone subscribership in... * [80]Quarterly Inquiries and Complaints Report (1st Qtr, 2010) 01.17.2010 This report tracks the top subject areas for consumer inquiries and complaints received during the... * [81]Quality of Service Report of the Local Operating Companies (2007-2008) 12.24.2009 This report summarizes the Automated Reporting Management Information System (ARMIS) service... * [82]Telephone Subscribership Report (through July 2009) 12.15.2009 This is the Federal Communications Commissions (FCCs) report on telephone subscribership in... * [83]Quarterly
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/fcc2006budget.html?page=4&fontsize=mediumFont
  • 43.61 International Traffic Data Reports [_] Statistics of Communications Common Carrier Reports [_] Telephone Penetration Reports [_] Telephone Subscribership Reports [_] Trends in Telephony Service [_] Video Competition Reports Apply Filter * [79]Telephone Subscribership Report (through November 2009) 02.02.2010 This is the Federal Communications Commissions (FCCs) report on telephone subscribership in... * [80]Quarterly Inquiries and Complaints Report (1st Qtr, 2010) 01.17.2010 This report tracks the top subject areas for consumer inquiries and complaints received during the... * [81]Quality of Service Report of the Local Operating Companies (2007-2008) 12.24.2009 This report summarizes the Automated Reporting Management Information System (ARMIS) service... * [82]Telephone Subscribership Report (through July 2009) 12.15.2009 This is the Federal Communications Commissions (FCCs) report on telephone subscribership in... * [83]Quarterly
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/fcc2006budget.html?page=9
  • its annual year-end circuit status report for U.... * [86]Trends in Telephony Service (2007) 02.01.2007 Trends in Telephone Service is published by the Industry Analysis and Technology Division of... * [87]High Speed Services for Internet Access (As of 06/30/06) 01.31.2007 We summarize here information from the fourteenth semi-annual data collection, thereby presenting a... * [88]Telephone Subscribership Report (through July 2006) 01.17.2007 This is the Federal Communications Commissions (FCCs) report on telephone subscribership in... * [89] * [90] * * [91]6 * [92]7 * [93]8 * [94]9 * 10 * [95]11 * [96]12 * [97]13 * [98]14 * * [99] * [100] Connect * [101]Facebook * [102]Twitter * [103]YouTube * [104]Flickr Share this page * Reddit * Digg * Facebook * Twitter
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/fcc2006budget.html?page=9&contrast=
  • its annual year-end circuit status report for U.... * [86]Trends in Telephony Service (2007) 02.01.2007 Trends in Telephone Service is published by the Industry Analysis and Technology Division of... * [87]High Speed Services for Internet Access (As of 06/30/06) 01.31.2007 We summarize here information from the fourteenth semi-annual data collection, thereby presenting a... * [88]Telephone Subscribership Report (through July 2006) 01.17.2007 This is the Federal Communications Commissions (FCCs) report on telephone subscribership in... * [89] * [90] * * [91]6 * [92]7 * [93]8 * [94]9 * 10 * [95]11 * [96]12 * [97]13 * [98]14 * * [99] * [100] Connect * [101]Facebook * [102]Twitter * [103]YouTube * [104]Flickr Share this page * Reddit * Digg * Facebook * Twitter
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/fcc2006budget.html?page=9&contrast=highContrast
  • its annual year-end circuit status report for U.... * [86]Trends in Telephony Service (2007) 02.01.2007 Trends in Telephone Service is published by the Industry Analysis and Technology Division of... * [87]High Speed Services for Internet Access (As of 06/30/06) 01.31.2007 We summarize here information from the fourteenth semi-annual data collection, thereby presenting a... * [88]Telephone Subscribership Report (through July 2006) 01.17.2007 This is the Federal Communications Commissions (FCCs) report on telephone subscribership in... * [89] * [90] * * [91]6 * [92]7 * [93]8 * [94]9 * 10 * [95]11 * [96]12 * [97]13 * [98]14 * * [99] * [100] Connect * [101]Facebook * [102]Twitter * [103]YouTube * [104]Flickr Share this page * Reddit * Digg * Facebook * Twitter
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/fcc2006budget.html?page=9&fontsize=
  • its annual year-end circuit status report for U.... * [86]Trends in Telephony Service (2007) 02.01.2007 Trends in Telephone Service is published by the Industry Analysis and Technology Division of... * [87]High Speed Services for Internet Access (As of 06/30/06) 01.31.2007 We summarize here information from the fourteenth semi-annual data collection, thereby presenting a... * [88]Telephone Subscribership Report (through July 2006) 01.17.2007 This is the Federal Communications Commissions (FCCs) report on telephone subscribership in... * [89] * [90] * * [91]6 * [92]7 * [93]8 * [94]9 * 10 * [95]11 * [96]12 * [97]13 * [98]14 * * [99] * [100] Connect * [101]Facebook * [102]Twitter * [103]YouTube * [104]Flickr Share this page * Reddit * Digg * Facebook * Twitter
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/fcc2006budget.html?page=9&fontsize=largeFont
  • its annual year-end circuit status report for U.... * [86]Trends in Telephony Service (2007) 02.01.2007 Trends in Telephone Service is published by the Industry Analysis and Technology Division of... * [87]High Speed Services for Internet Access (As of 06/30/06) 01.31.2007 We summarize here information from the fourteenth semi-annual data collection, thereby presenting a... * [88]Telephone Subscribership Report (through July 2006) 01.17.2007 This is the Federal Communications Commissions (FCCs) report on telephone subscribership in... * [89] * [90] * * [91]6 * [92]7 * [93]8 * [94]9 * 10 * [95]11 * [96]12 * [97]13 * [98]14 * * [99] * [100] Connect * [101]Facebook * [102]Twitter * [103]YouTube * [104]Flickr Share this page * Reddit * Digg * Facebook * Twitter
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/fcc2006budget.html?page=9&fontsize=mediumFont
  • its annual year-end circuit status report for U.... * [86]Trends in Telephony Service (2007) 02.01.2007 Trends in Telephone Service is published by the Industry Analysis and Technology Division of... * [87]High Speed Services for Internet Access (As of 06/30/06) 01.31.2007 We summarize here information from the fourteenth semi-annual data collection, thereby presenting a... * [88]Telephone Subscribership Report (through July 2006) 01.17.2007 This is the Federal Communications Commissions (FCCs) report on telephone subscribership in... * [89] * [90] * * [91]6 * [92]7 * [93]8 * [94]9 * 10 * [95]11 * [96]12 * [97]13 * [98]14 * * [99] * [100] Connect * [101]Facebook * [102]Twitter * [103]YouTube * [104]Flickr Share this page * Reddit * Digg * Facebook * Twitter
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/fcc2007budget.html?page=10
  • to Congress as required by the Orbit Act [_] Satellite Competition Reports [_] Section 257 Triennial Reports [_] Section 43.61 International Traffic Data Reports [_] Statistics of Communications Common Carrier Reports [_] Telephone Penetration Reports [_] Telephone Subscribership Reports [_] Trends in Telephony Service [_] Video Competition Reports Apply Filter * [79]Numbering Resource Utilization in the U.S. (As of 12/31/05) 01.17.2007 This is the Federal Communications Commissions report on numbering resource utilization in... * [80]Local Telephone Competition (As of 06/30/06) 01.07.2007 We present here summary statistics of the latest data on local telephone service competition in... * [81]Report on Cable Industry Prices (2005) 12.27.2006 Section 623(k) of the Communications Act, as amended by the Cable Television Consumer ... * [82]Commercial Mobile
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/fcc2007budget.html?page=10&contrast=
  • to Congress as required by the Orbit Act [_] Satellite Competition Reports [_] Section 257 Triennial Reports [_] Section 43.61 International Traffic Data Reports [_] Statistics of Communications Common Carrier Reports [_] Telephone Penetration Reports [_] Telephone Subscribership Reports [_] Trends in Telephony Service [_] Video Competition Reports Apply Filter * [79]Numbering Resource Utilization in the U.S. (As of 12/31/05) 01.17.2007 This is the Federal Communications Commissions report on numbering resource utilization in... * [80]Local Telephone Competition (As of 06/30/06) 01.07.2007 We present here summary statistics of the latest data on local telephone service competition in... * [81]Report on Cable Industry Prices (2005) 12.27.2006 Section 623(k) of the Communications Act, as amended by the Cable Television Consumer ... * [82]Commercial Mobile
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/fcc2007budget.html?page=10&contrast=highContrast
  • to Congress as required by the Orbit Act [_] Satellite Competition Reports [_] Section 257 Triennial Reports [_] Section 43.61 International Traffic Data Reports [_] Statistics of Communications Common Carrier Reports [_] Telephone Penetration Reports [_] Telephone Subscribership Reports [_] Trends in Telephony Service [_] Video Competition Reports Apply Filter * [79]Numbering Resource Utilization in the U.S. (As of 12/31/05) 01.17.2007 This is the Federal Communications Commissions report on numbering resource utilization in... * [80]Local Telephone Competition (As of 06/30/06) 01.07.2007 We present here summary statistics of the latest data on local telephone service competition in... * [81]Report on Cable Industry Prices (2005) 12.27.2006 Section 623(k) of the Communications Act, as amended by the Cable Television Consumer ... * [82]Commercial Mobile
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/fcc2007budget.html?page=10&fontsize=
  • to Congress as required by the Orbit Act [_] Satellite Competition Reports [_] Section 257 Triennial Reports [_] Section 43.61 International Traffic Data Reports [_] Statistics of Communications Common Carrier Reports [_] Telephone Penetration Reports [_] Telephone Subscribership Reports [_] Trends in Telephony Service [_] Video Competition Reports Apply Filter * [79]Numbering Resource Utilization in the U.S. (As of 12/31/05) 01.17.2007 This is the Federal Communications Commissions report on numbering resource utilization in... * [80]Local Telephone Competition (As of 06/30/06) 01.07.2007 We present here summary statistics of the latest data on local telephone service competition in... * [81]Report on Cable Industry Prices (2005) 12.27.2006 Section 623(k) of the Communications Act, as amended by the Cable Television Consumer ... * [82]Commercial Mobile
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/fcc2007budget.html?page=10&fontsize=largeFont
  • to Congress as required by the Orbit Act [_] Satellite Competition Reports [_] Section 257 Triennial Reports [_] Section 43.61 International Traffic Data Reports [_] Statistics of Communications Common Carrier Reports [_] Telephone Penetration Reports [_] Telephone Subscribership Reports [_] Trends in Telephony Service [_] Video Competition Reports Apply Filter * [79]Numbering Resource Utilization in the U.S. (As of 12/31/05) 01.17.2007 This is the Federal Communications Commissions report on numbering resource utilization in... * [80]Local Telephone Competition (As of 06/30/06) 01.07.2007 We present here summary statistics of the latest data on local telephone service competition in... * [81]Report on Cable Industry Prices (2005) 12.27.2006 Section 623(k) of the Communications Act, as amended by the Cable Television Consumer ... * [82]Commercial Mobile
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/fcc2007budget.html?page=10&fontsize=mediumFont
  • to Congress as required by the Orbit Act [_] Satellite Competition Reports [_] Section 257 Triennial Reports [_] Section 43.61 International Traffic Data Reports [_] Statistics of Communications Common Carrier Reports [_] Telephone Penetration Reports [_] Telephone Subscribership Reports [_] Trends in Telephony Service [_] Video Competition Reports Apply Filter * [79]Numbering Resource Utilization in the U.S. (As of 12/31/05) 01.17.2007 This is the Federal Communications Commissions report on numbering resource utilization in... * [80]Local Telephone Competition (As of 06/30/06) 01.07.2007 We present here summary statistics of the latest data on local telephone service competition in... * [81]Report on Cable Industry Prices (2005) 12.27.2006 Section 623(k) of the Communications Act, as amended by the Cable Television Consumer ... * [82]Commercial Mobile
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/fcc2007budget.html?page=18
  • 43.61 International Traffic Data Reports [_] Statistics of Communications Common Carrier Reports [_] Telephone Penetration Reports [_] Telephone Subscribership Reports [_] Trends in Telephony Service [_] Video Competition Reports Apply Filter * [79]Telephone Subscribership Report (through July 2002) 02.12.2003 This is the Federal Communications Commissions (FCCs) report on telephone subscribership in... * [80]Quarterly Inquiries and Complaints Report (1st Qtr, 2003) 01.17.2003 This report tracks the top subject areas for consumer inquiries and complaints received during the... * [81]Quality of Service Report of the Local Operating Companies (2000-2001) 01.03.2003 This report summarizes various kinds of service quality data filed by certain incumbent local... * [82]9th Annual Video Competition Report 12.31.2002 This is the Commissions ninth annual report (2002 Report) to Congress on
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/fcc2007budget.html?page=18&contrast=
  • 43.61 International Traffic Data Reports [_] Statistics of Communications Common Carrier Reports [_] Telephone Penetration Reports [_] Telephone Subscribership Reports [_] Trends in Telephony Service [_] Video Competition Reports Apply Filter * [79]Telephone Subscribership Report (through July 2002) 02.12.2003 This is the Federal Communications Commissions (FCCs) report on telephone subscribership in... * [80]Quarterly Inquiries and Complaints Report (1st Qtr, 2003) 01.17.2003 This report tracks the top subject areas for consumer inquiries and complaints received during the... * [81]Quality of Service Report of the Local Operating Companies (2000-2001) 01.03.2003 This report summarizes various kinds of service quality data filed by certain incumbent local... * [82]9th Annual Video Competition Report 12.31.2002 This is the Commissions ninth annual report (2002 Report) to Congress on
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/fcc2007budget.html?page=18&contrast=highContrast
  • 43.61 International Traffic Data Reports [_] Statistics of Communications Common Carrier Reports [_] Telephone Penetration Reports [_] Telephone Subscribership Reports [_] Trends in Telephony Service [_] Video Competition Reports Apply Filter * [79]Telephone Subscribership Report (through July 2002) 02.12.2003 This is the Federal Communications Commissions (FCCs) report on telephone subscribership in... * [80]Quarterly Inquiries and Complaints Report (1st Qtr, 2003) 01.17.2003 This report tracks the top subject areas for consumer inquiries and complaints received during the... * [81]Quality of Service Report of the Local Operating Companies (2000-2001) 01.03.2003 This report summarizes various kinds of service quality data filed by certain incumbent local... * [82]9th Annual Video Competition Report 12.31.2002 This is the Commissions ninth annual report (2002 Report) to Congress on
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/fcc2007budget.html?page=18&fontsize=
  • 43.61 International Traffic Data Reports [_] Statistics of Communications Common Carrier Reports [_] Telephone Penetration Reports [_] Telephone Subscribership Reports [_] Trends in Telephony Service [_] Video Competition Reports Apply Filter * [79]Telephone Subscribership Report (through July 2002) 02.12.2003 This is the Federal Communications Commissions (FCCs) report on telephone subscribership in... * [80]Quarterly Inquiries and Complaints Report (1st Qtr, 2003) 01.17.2003 This report tracks the top subject areas for consumer inquiries and complaints received during the... * [81]Quality of Service Report of the Local Operating Companies (2000-2001) 01.03.2003 This report summarizes various kinds of service quality data filed by certain incumbent local... * [82]9th Annual Video Competition Report 12.31.2002 This is the Commissions ninth annual report (2002 Report) to Congress on
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/fcc2007budget.html?page=18&fontsize=largeFont
  • 43.61 International Traffic Data Reports [_] Statistics of Communications Common Carrier Reports [_] Telephone Penetration Reports [_] Telephone Subscribership Reports [_] Trends in Telephony Service [_] Video Competition Reports Apply Filter * [79]Telephone Subscribership Report (through July 2002) 02.12.2003 This is the Federal Communications Commissions (FCCs) report on telephone subscribership in... * [80]Quarterly Inquiries and Complaints Report (1st Qtr, 2003) 01.17.2003 This report tracks the top subject areas for consumer inquiries and complaints received during the... * [81]Quality of Service Report of the Local Operating Companies (2000-2001) 01.03.2003 This report summarizes various kinds of service quality data filed by certain incumbent local... * [82]9th Annual Video Competition Report 12.31.2002 This is the Commissions ninth annual report (2002 Report) to Congress on
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/fcc2007budget.html?page=18&fontsize=mediumFont
  • 43.61 International Traffic Data Reports [_] Statistics of Communications Common Carrier Reports [_] Telephone Penetration Reports [_] Telephone Subscribership Reports [_] Trends in Telephony Service [_] Video Competition Reports Apply Filter * [79]Telephone Subscribership Report (through July 2002) 02.12.2003 This is the Federal Communications Commissions (FCCs) report on telephone subscribership in... * [80]Quarterly Inquiries and Complaints Report (1st Qtr, 2003) 01.17.2003 This report tracks the top subject areas for consumer inquiries and complaints received during the... * [81]Quality of Service Report of the Local Operating Companies (2000-2001) 01.03.2003 This report summarizes various kinds of service quality data filed by certain incumbent local... * [82]9th Annual Video Competition Report 12.31.2002 This is the Commissions ninth annual report (2002 Report) to Congress on
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/fcc2007budget.html?page=20
  • (FCCs) report on telephone subscribership in the... * [81]Third Broadband Progress Report 02.07.2002 The FCC released its third report on the availability of advanced telecommunications capability... * [82]High Speed Services for Internet Access (As of 06/30/01) 02.01.2002 We summarize here information from the fourth data collection, thereby presenting a snapshot of... * [83]Quarterly Inquiries and Complaints Report (1st Qtr, 2002) 01.17.2002 This report tracks the top subject areas for consumer inquiries and complaints received during the... * [84]8th Annual Video Competition Report 01.14.2002 This is the Commissions eighth annual report (2001 Report) to Congress on the status of ... * [85]Quality of Service Report of the Local Operating Companies (1999-2000) 12.05.2001 This report summarizes various kinds of service quality data filed
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/fcc2007budget.html?page=20&contrast=
  • (FCCs) report on telephone subscribership in the... * [81]Third Broadband Progress Report 02.07.2002 The FCC released its third report on the availability of advanced telecommunications capability... * [82]High Speed Services for Internet Access (As of 06/30/01) 02.01.2002 We summarize here information from the fourth data collection, thereby presenting a snapshot of... * [83]Quarterly Inquiries and Complaints Report (1st Qtr, 2002) 01.17.2002 This report tracks the top subject areas for consumer inquiries and complaints received during the... * [84]8th Annual Video Competition Report 01.14.2002 This is the Commissions eighth annual report (2001 Report) to Congress on the status of ... * [85]Quality of Service Report of the Local Operating Companies (1999-2000) 12.05.2001 This report summarizes various kinds of service quality data filed
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/fcc2007budget.html?page=20&contrast=highContrast
  • (FCCs) report on telephone subscribership in the... * [81]Third Broadband Progress Report 02.07.2002 The FCC released its third report on the availability of advanced telecommunications capability... * [82]High Speed Services for Internet Access (As of 06/30/01) 02.01.2002 We summarize here information from the fourth data collection, thereby presenting a snapshot of... * [83]Quarterly Inquiries and Complaints Report (1st Qtr, 2002) 01.17.2002 This report tracks the top subject areas for consumer inquiries and complaints received during the... * [84]8th Annual Video Competition Report 01.14.2002 This is the Commissions eighth annual report (2001 Report) to Congress on the status of ... * [85]Quality of Service Report of the Local Operating Companies (1999-2000) 12.05.2001 This report summarizes various kinds of service quality data filed
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/fcc2007budget.html?page=20&fontsize=
  • (FCCs) report on telephone subscribership in the... * [81]Third Broadband Progress Report 02.07.2002 The FCC released its third report on the availability of advanced telecommunications capability... * [82]High Speed Services for Internet Access (As of 06/30/01) 02.01.2002 We summarize here information from the fourth data collection, thereby presenting a snapshot of... * [83]Quarterly Inquiries and Complaints Report (1st Qtr, 2002) 01.17.2002 This report tracks the top subject areas for consumer inquiries and complaints received during the... * [84]8th Annual Video Competition Report 01.14.2002 This is the Commissions eighth annual report (2001 Report) to Congress on the status of ... * [85]Quality of Service Report of the Local Operating Companies (1999-2000) 12.05.2001 This report summarizes various kinds of service quality data filed
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/fcc2007budget.html?page=20&fontsize=largeFont
  • (FCCs) report on telephone subscribership in the... * [81]Third Broadband Progress Report 02.07.2002 The FCC released its third report on the availability of advanced telecommunications capability... * [82]High Speed Services for Internet Access (As of 06/30/01) 02.01.2002 We summarize here information from the fourth data collection, thereby presenting a snapshot of... * [83]Quarterly Inquiries and Complaints Report (1st Qtr, 2002) 01.17.2002 This report tracks the top subject areas for consumer inquiries and complaints received during the... * [84]8th Annual Video Competition Report 01.14.2002 This is the Commissions eighth annual report (2001 Report) to Congress on the status of ... * [85]Quality of Service Report of the Local Operating Companies (1999-2000) 12.05.2001 This report summarizes various kinds of service quality data filed
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/fcc2007budget.html?page=20&fontsize=mediumFont
  • (FCCs) report on telephone subscribership in the... * [81]Third Broadband Progress Report 02.07.2002 The FCC released its third report on the availability of advanced telecommunications capability... * [82]High Speed Services for Internet Access (As of 06/30/01) 02.01.2002 We summarize here information from the fourth data collection, thereby presenting a snapshot of... * [83]Quarterly Inquiries and Complaints Report (1st Qtr, 2002) 01.17.2002 This report tracks the top subject areas for consumer inquiries and complaints received during the... * [84]8th Annual Video Competition Report 01.14.2002 This is the Commissions eighth annual report (2001 Report) to Congress on the status of ... * [85]Quality of Service Report of the Local Operating Companies (1999-2000) 12.05.2001 This report summarizes various kinds of service quality data filed
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/fcc2007budget.html?page=4
  • 43.61 International Traffic Data Reports [_] Statistics of Communications Common Carrier Reports [_] Telephone Penetration Reports [_] Telephone Subscribership Reports [_] Trends in Telephony Service [_] Video Competition Reports Apply Filter * [79]Telephone Subscribership Report (through November 2009) 02.02.2010 This is the Federal Communications Commissions (FCCs) report on telephone subscribership in... * [80]Quarterly Inquiries and Complaints Report (1st Qtr, 2010) 01.17.2010 This report tracks the top subject areas for consumer inquiries and complaints received during the... * [81]Quality of Service Report of the Local Operating Companies (2007-2008) 12.24.2009 This report summarizes the Automated Reporting Management Information System (ARMIS) service... * [82]Telephone Subscribership Report (through July 2009) 12.15.2009 This is the Federal Communications Commissions (FCCs) report on telephone subscribership in... * [83]Quarterly
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/fcc2007budget.html?page=4&contrast=
  • 43.61 International Traffic Data Reports [_] Statistics of Communications Common Carrier Reports [_] Telephone Penetration Reports [_] Telephone Subscribership Reports [_] Trends in Telephony Service [_] Video Competition Reports Apply Filter * [79]Telephone Subscribership Report (through November 2009) 02.02.2010 This is the Federal Communications Commissions (FCCs) report on telephone subscribership in... * [80]Quarterly Inquiries and Complaints Report (1st Qtr, 2010) 01.17.2010 This report tracks the top subject areas for consumer inquiries and complaints received during the... * [81]Quality of Service Report of the Local Operating Companies (2007-2008) 12.24.2009 This report summarizes the Automated Reporting Management Information System (ARMIS) service... * [82]Telephone Subscribership Report (through July 2009) 12.15.2009 This is the Federal Communications Commissions (FCCs) report on telephone subscribership in... * [83]Quarterly
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/fcc2007budget.html?page=4&contrast=highContrast
  • 43.61 International Traffic Data Reports [_] Statistics of Communications Common Carrier Reports [_] Telephone Penetration Reports [_] Telephone Subscribership Reports [_] Trends in Telephony Service [_] Video Competition Reports Apply Filter * [79]Telephone Subscribership Report (through November 2009) 02.02.2010 This is the Federal Communications Commissions (FCCs) report on telephone subscribership in... * [80]Quarterly Inquiries and Complaints Report (1st Qtr, 2010) 01.17.2010 This report tracks the top subject areas for consumer inquiries and complaints received during the... * [81]Quality of Service Report of the Local Operating Companies (2007-2008) 12.24.2009 This report summarizes the Automated Reporting Management Information System (ARMIS) service... * [82]Telephone Subscribership Report (through July 2009) 12.15.2009 This is the Federal Communications Commissions (FCCs) report on telephone subscribership in... * [83]Quarterly
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/fcc2007budget.html?page=4&fontsize=
  • 43.61 International Traffic Data Reports [_] Statistics of Communications Common Carrier Reports [_] Telephone Penetration Reports [_] Telephone Subscribership Reports [_] Trends in Telephony Service [_] Video Competition Reports Apply Filter * [79]Telephone Subscribership Report (through November 2009) 02.02.2010 This is the Federal Communications Commissions (FCCs) report on telephone subscribership in... * [80]Quarterly Inquiries and Complaints Report (1st Qtr, 2010) 01.17.2010 This report tracks the top subject areas for consumer inquiries and complaints received during the... * [81]Quality of Service Report of the Local Operating Companies (2007-2008) 12.24.2009 This report summarizes the Automated Reporting Management Information System (ARMIS) service... * [82]Telephone Subscribership Report (through July 2009) 12.15.2009 This is the Federal Communications Commissions (FCCs) report on telephone subscribership in... * [83]Quarterly
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/fcc2007budget.html?page=4&fontsize=largeFont
  • 43.61 International Traffic Data Reports [_] Statistics of Communications Common Carrier Reports [_] Telephone Penetration Reports [_] Telephone Subscribership Reports [_] Trends in Telephony Service [_] Video Competition Reports Apply Filter * [79]Telephone Subscribership Report (through November 2009) 02.02.2010 This is the Federal Communications Commissions (FCCs) report on telephone subscribership in... * [80]Quarterly Inquiries and Complaints Report (1st Qtr, 2010) 01.17.2010 This report tracks the top subject areas for consumer inquiries and complaints received during the... * [81]Quality of Service Report of the Local Operating Companies (2007-2008) 12.24.2009 This report summarizes the Automated Reporting Management Information System (ARMIS) service... * [82]Telephone Subscribership Report (through July 2009) 12.15.2009 This is the Federal Communications Commissions (FCCs) report on telephone subscribership in... * [83]Quarterly
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/fcc2007budget.html?page=4&fontsize=mediumFont
  • 43.61 International Traffic Data Reports [_] Statistics of Communications Common Carrier Reports [_] Telephone Penetration Reports [_] Telephone Subscribership Reports [_] Trends in Telephony Service [_] Video Competition Reports Apply Filter * [79]Telephone Subscribership Report (through November 2009) 02.02.2010 This is the Federal Communications Commissions (FCCs) report on telephone subscribership in... * [80]Quarterly Inquiries and Complaints Report (1st Qtr, 2010) 01.17.2010 This report tracks the top subject areas for consumer inquiries and complaints received during the... * [81]Quality of Service Report of the Local Operating Companies (2007-2008) 12.24.2009 This report summarizes the Automated Reporting Management Information System (ARMIS) service... * [82]Telephone Subscribership Report (through July 2009) 12.15.2009 This is the Federal Communications Commissions (FCCs) report on telephone subscribership in... * [83]Quarterly
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/fcc2007budget.html?page=9
  • its annual year-end circuit status report for U.... * [86]Trends in Telephony Service (2007) 02.01.2007 Trends in Telephone Service is published by the Industry Analysis and Technology Division of... * [87]High Speed Services for Internet Access (As of 06/30/06) 01.31.2007 We summarize here information from the fourteenth semi-annual data collection, thereby presenting a... * [88]Telephone Subscribership Report (through July 2006) 01.17.2007 This is the Federal Communications Commissions (FCCs) report on telephone subscribership in... * [89] * [90] * * [91]6 * [92]7 * [93]8 * [94]9 * 10 * [95]11 * [96]12 * [97]13 * [98]14 * * [99] * [100] Connect * [101]Facebook * [102]Twitter * [103]YouTube * [104]Flickr Share this page * Reddit * Digg * Facebook * Twitter
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/fcc2007budget.html?page=9&contrast=
  • its annual year-end circuit status report for U.... * [86]Trends in Telephony Service (2007) 02.01.2007 Trends in Telephone Service is published by the Industry Analysis and Technology Division of... * [87]High Speed Services for Internet Access (As of 06/30/06) 01.31.2007 We summarize here information from the fourteenth semi-annual data collection, thereby presenting a... * [88]Telephone Subscribership Report (through July 2006) 01.17.2007 This is the Federal Communications Commissions (FCCs) report on telephone subscribership in... * [89] * [90] * * [91]6 * [92]7 * [93]8 * [94]9 * 10 * [95]11 * [96]12 * [97]13 * [98]14 * * [99] * [100] Connect * [101]Facebook * [102]Twitter * [103]YouTube * [104]Flickr Share this page * Reddit * Digg * Facebook * Twitter
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/fcc2007budget.html?page=9&contrast=highContrast
  • its annual year-end circuit status report for U.... * [86]Trends in Telephony Service (2007) 02.01.2007 Trends in Telephone Service is published by the Industry Analysis and Technology Division of... * [87]High Speed Services for Internet Access (As of 06/30/06) 01.31.2007 We summarize here information from the fourteenth semi-annual data collection, thereby presenting a... * [88]Telephone Subscribership Report (through July 2006) 01.17.2007 This is the Federal Communications Commissions (FCCs) report on telephone subscribership in... * [89] * [90] * * [91]6 * [92]7 * [93]8 * [94]9 * 10 * [95]11 * [96]12 * [97]13 * [98]14 * * [99] * [100] Connect * [101]Facebook * [102]Twitter * [103]YouTube * [104]Flickr Share this page * Reddit * Digg * Facebook * Twitter
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/fcc2007budget.html?page=9&fontsize=
  • its annual year-end circuit status report for U.... * [86]Trends in Telephony Service (2007) 02.01.2007 Trends in Telephone Service is published by the Industry Analysis and Technology Division of... * [87]High Speed Services for Internet Access (As of 06/30/06) 01.31.2007 We summarize here information from the fourteenth semi-annual data collection, thereby presenting a... * [88]Telephone Subscribership Report (through July 2006) 01.17.2007 This is the Federal Communications Commissions (FCCs) report on telephone subscribership in... * [89] * [90] * * [91]6 * [92]7 * [93]8 * [94]9 * 10 * [95]11 * [96]12 * [97]13 * [98]14 * * [99] * [100] Connect * [101]Facebook * [102]Twitter * [103]YouTube * [104]Flickr Share this page * Reddit * Digg * Facebook * Twitter
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/fcc2007budget.html?page=9&fontsize=largeFont
  • its annual year-end circuit status report for U.... * [86]Trends in Telephony Service (2007) 02.01.2007 Trends in Telephone Service is published by the Industry Analysis and Technology Division of... * [87]High Speed Services for Internet Access (As of 06/30/06) 01.31.2007 We summarize here information from the fourteenth semi-annual data collection, thereby presenting a... * [88]Telephone Subscribership Report (through July 2006) 01.17.2007 This is the Federal Communications Commissions (FCCs) report on telephone subscribership in... * [89] * [90] * * [91]6 * [92]7 * [93]8 * [94]9 * 10 * [95]11 * [96]12 * [97]13 * [98]14 * * [99] * [100] Connect * [101]Facebook * [102]Twitter * [103]YouTube * [104]Flickr Share this page * Reddit * Digg * Facebook * Twitter
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/fcc2007budget.html?page=9&fontsize=mediumFont
  • its annual year-end circuit status report for U.... * [86]Trends in Telephony Service (2007) 02.01.2007 Trends in Telephone Service is published by the Industry Analysis and Technology Division of... * [87]High Speed Services for Internet Access (As of 06/30/06) 01.31.2007 We summarize here information from the fourteenth semi-annual data collection, thereby presenting a... * [88]Telephone Subscribership Report (through July 2006) 01.17.2007 This is the Federal Communications Commissions (FCCs) report on telephone subscribership in... * [89] * [90] * * [91]6 * [92]7 * [93]8 * [94]9 * 10 * [95]11 * [96]12 * [97]13 * [98]14 * * [99] * [100] Connect * [101]Facebook * [102]Twitter * [103]YouTube * [104]Flickr Share this page * Reddit * Digg * Facebook * Twitter
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/fcc2008budget.html?page=10
  • to Congress as required by the Orbit Act [_] Satellite Competition Reports [_] Section 257 Triennial Reports [_] Section 43.61 International Traffic Data Reports [_] Statistics of Communications Common Carrier Reports [_] Telephone Penetration Reports [_] Telephone Subscribership Reports [_] Trends in Telephony Service [_] Video Competition Reports Apply Filter * [79]Numbering Resource Utilization in the U.S. (As of 12/31/05) 01.17.2007 This is the Federal Communications Commissions report on numbering resource utilization in... * [80]Local Telephone Competition (As of 06/30/06) 01.07.2007 We present here summary statistics of the latest data on local telephone service competition in... * [81]Report on Cable Industry Prices (2005) 12.27.2006 Section 623(k) of the Communications Act, as amended by the Cable Television Consumer ... * [82]Commercial Mobile
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/fcc2008budget.html?page=10&contrast=
  • to Congress as required by the Orbit Act [_] Satellite Competition Reports [_] Section 257 Triennial Reports [_] Section 43.61 International Traffic Data Reports [_] Statistics of Communications Common Carrier Reports [_] Telephone Penetration Reports [_] Telephone Subscribership Reports [_] Trends in Telephony Service [_] Video Competition Reports Apply Filter * [79]Numbering Resource Utilization in the U.S. (As of 12/31/05) 01.17.2007 This is the Federal Communications Commissions report on numbering resource utilization in... * [80]Local Telephone Competition (As of 06/30/06) 01.07.2007 We present here summary statistics of the latest data on local telephone service competition in... * [81]Report on Cable Industry Prices (2005) 12.27.2006 Section 623(k) of the Communications Act, as amended by the Cable Television Consumer ... * [82]Commercial Mobile
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/fcc2008budget.html?page=10&contrast=highContrast
  • to Congress as required by the Orbit Act [_] Satellite Competition Reports [_] Section 257 Triennial Reports [_] Section 43.61 International Traffic Data Reports [_] Statistics of Communications Common Carrier Reports [_] Telephone Penetration Reports [_] Telephone Subscribership Reports [_] Trends in Telephony Service [_] Video Competition Reports Apply Filter * [79]Numbering Resource Utilization in the U.S. (As of 12/31/05) 01.17.2007 This is the Federal Communications Commissions report on numbering resource utilization in... * [80]Local Telephone Competition (As of 06/30/06) 01.07.2007 We present here summary statistics of the latest data on local telephone service competition in... * [81]Report on Cable Industry Prices (2005) 12.27.2006 Section 623(k) of the Communications Act, as amended by the Cable Television Consumer ... * [82]Commercial Mobile
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/fcc2008budget.html?page=10&fontsize=
  • to Congress as required by the Orbit Act [_] Satellite Competition Reports [_] Section 257 Triennial Reports [_] Section 43.61 International Traffic Data Reports [_] Statistics of Communications Common Carrier Reports [_] Telephone Penetration Reports [_] Telephone Subscribership Reports [_] Trends in Telephony Service [_] Video Competition Reports Apply Filter * [79]Numbering Resource Utilization in the U.S. (As of 12/31/05) 01.17.2007 This is the Federal Communications Commissions report on numbering resource utilization in... * [80]Local Telephone Competition (As of 06/30/06) 01.07.2007 We present here summary statistics of the latest data on local telephone service competition in... * [81]Report on Cable Industry Prices (2005) 12.27.2006 Section 623(k) of the Communications Act, as amended by the Cable Television Consumer ... * [82]Commercial Mobile
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/fcc2008budget.html?page=10&fontsize=largeFont
  • to Congress as required by the Orbit Act [_] Satellite Competition Reports [_] Section 257 Triennial Reports [_] Section 43.61 International Traffic Data Reports [_] Statistics of Communications Common Carrier Reports [_] Telephone Penetration Reports [_] Telephone Subscribership Reports [_] Trends in Telephony Service [_] Video Competition Reports Apply Filter * [79]Numbering Resource Utilization in the U.S. (As of 12/31/05) 01.17.2007 This is the Federal Communications Commissions report on numbering resource utilization in... * [80]Local Telephone Competition (As of 06/30/06) 01.07.2007 We present here summary statistics of the latest data on local telephone service competition in... * [81]Report on Cable Industry Prices (2005) 12.27.2006 Section 623(k) of the Communications Act, as amended by the Cable Television Consumer ... * [82]Commercial Mobile
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/fcc2008budget.html?page=10&fontsize=mediumFont
  • to Congress as required by the Orbit Act [_] Satellite Competition Reports [_] Section 257 Triennial Reports [_] Section 43.61 International Traffic Data Reports [_] Statistics of Communications Common Carrier Reports [_] Telephone Penetration Reports [_] Telephone Subscribership Reports [_] Trends in Telephony Service [_] Video Competition Reports Apply Filter * [79]Numbering Resource Utilization in the U.S. (As of 12/31/05) 01.17.2007 This is the Federal Communications Commissions report on numbering resource utilization in... * [80]Local Telephone Competition (As of 06/30/06) 01.07.2007 We present here summary statistics of the latest data on local telephone service competition in... * [81]Report on Cable Industry Prices (2005) 12.27.2006 Section 623(k) of the Communications Act, as amended by the Cable Television Consumer ... * [82]Commercial Mobile
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/fcc2008budget.html?page=18
  • 43.61 International Traffic Data Reports [_] Statistics of Communications Common Carrier Reports [_] Telephone Penetration Reports [_] Telephone Subscribership Reports [_] Trends in Telephony Service [_] Video Competition Reports Apply Filter * [79]Telephone Subscribership Report (through July 2002) 02.12.2003 This is the Federal Communications Commissions (FCCs) report on telephone subscribership in... * [80]Quarterly Inquiries and Complaints Report (1st Qtr, 2003) 01.17.2003 This report tracks the top subject areas for consumer inquiries and complaints received during the... * [81]Quality of Service Report of the Local Operating Companies (2000-2001) 01.03.2003 This report summarizes various kinds of service quality data filed by certain incumbent local... * [82]9th Annual Video Competition Report 12.31.2002 This is the Commissions ninth annual report (2002 Report) to Congress on
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/fcc2008budget.html?page=18&contrast=
  • 43.61 International Traffic Data Reports [_] Statistics of Communications Common Carrier Reports [_] Telephone Penetration Reports [_] Telephone Subscribership Reports [_] Trends in Telephony Service [_] Video Competition Reports Apply Filter * [79]Telephone Subscribership Report (through July 2002) 02.12.2003 This is the Federal Communications Commissions (FCCs) report on telephone subscribership in... * [80]Quarterly Inquiries and Complaints Report (1st Qtr, 2003) 01.17.2003 This report tracks the top subject areas for consumer inquiries and complaints received during the... * [81]Quality of Service Report of the Local Operating Companies (2000-2001) 01.03.2003 This report summarizes various kinds of service quality data filed by certain incumbent local... * [82]9th Annual Video Competition Report 12.31.2002 This is the Commissions ninth annual report (2002 Report) to Congress on
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/fcc2008budget.html?page=18&contrast=highContrast
  • 43.61 International Traffic Data Reports [_] Statistics of Communications Common Carrier Reports [_] Telephone Penetration Reports [_] Telephone Subscribership Reports [_] Trends in Telephony Service [_] Video Competition Reports Apply Filter * [79]Telephone Subscribership Report (through July 2002) 02.12.2003 This is the Federal Communications Commissions (FCCs) report on telephone subscribership in... * [80]Quarterly Inquiries and Complaints Report (1st Qtr, 2003) 01.17.2003 This report tracks the top subject areas for consumer inquiries and complaints received during the... * [81]Quality of Service Report of the Local Operating Companies (2000-2001) 01.03.2003 This report summarizes various kinds of service quality data filed by certain incumbent local... * [82]9th Annual Video Competition Report 12.31.2002 This is the Commissions ninth annual report (2002 Report) to Congress on
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/fcc2008budget.html?page=18&fontsize=
  • 43.61 International Traffic Data Reports [_] Statistics of Communications Common Carrier Reports [_] Telephone Penetration Reports [_] Telephone Subscribership Reports [_] Trends in Telephony Service [_] Video Competition Reports Apply Filter * [79]Telephone Subscribership Report (through July 2002) 02.12.2003 This is the Federal Communications Commissions (FCCs) report on telephone subscribership in... * [80]Quarterly Inquiries and Complaints Report (1st Qtr, 2003) 01.17.2003 This report tracks the top subject areas for consumer inquiries and complaints received during the... * [81]Quality of Service Report of the Local Operating Companies (2000-2001) 01.03.2003 This report summarizes various kinds of service quality data filed by certain incumbent local... * [82]9th Annual Video Competition Report 12.31.2002 This is the Commissions ninth annual report (2002 Report) to Congress on
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/fcc2008budget.html?page=18&fontsize=largeFont
  • 43.61 International Traffic Data Reports [_] Statistics of Communications Common Carrier Reports [_] Telephone Penetration Reports [_] Telephone Subscribership Reports [_] Trends in Telephony Service [_] Video Competition Reports Apply Filter * [79]Telephone Subscribership Report (through July 2002) 02.12.2003 This is the Federal Communications Commissions (FCCs) report on telephone subscribership in... * [80]Quarterly Inquiries and Complaints Report (1st Qtr, 2003) 01.17.2003 This report tracks the top subject areas for consumer inquiries and complaints received during the... * [81]Quality of Service Report of the Local Operating Companies (2000-2001) 01.03.2003 This report summarizes various kinds of service quality data filed by certain incumbent local... * [82]9th Annual Video Competition Report 12.31.2002 This is the Commissions ninth annual report (2002 Report) to Congress on
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/fcc2008budget.html?page=18&fontsize=mediumFont
  • 43.61 International Traffic Data Reports [_] Statistics of Communications Common Carrier Reports [_] Telephone Penetration Reports [_] Telephone Subscribership Reports [_] Trends in Telephony Service [_] Video Competition Reports Apply Filter * [79]Telephone Subscribership Report (through July 2002) 02.12.2003 This is the Federal Communications Commissions (FCCs) report on telephone subscribership in... * [80]Quarterly Inquiries and Complaints Report (1st Qtr, 2003) 01.17.2003 This report tracks the top subject areas for consumer inquiries and complaints received during the... * [81]Quality of Service Report of the Local Operating Companies (2000-2001) 01.03.2003 This report summarizes various kinds of service quality data filed by certain incumbent local... * [82]9th Annual Video Competition Report 12.31.2002 This is the Commissions ninth annual report (2002 Report) to Congress on
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/fcc2008budget.html?page=20
  • (FCCs) report on telephone subscribership in the... * [81]Third Broadband Progress Report 02.07.2002 The FCC released its third report on the availability of advanced telecommunications capability... * [82]High Speed Services for Internet Access (As of 06/30/01) 02.01.2002 We summarize here information from the fourth data collection, thereby presenting a snapshot of... * [83]Quarterly Inquiries and Complaints Report (1st Qtr, 2002) 01.17.2002 This report tracks the top subject areas for consumer inquiries and complaints received during the... * [84]8th Annual Video Competition Report 01.14.2002 This is the Commissions eighth annual report (2001 Report) to Congress on the status of ... * [85]Quality of Service Report of the Local Operating Companies (1999-2000) 12.05.2001 This report summarizes various kinds of service quality data filed
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/fcc2008budget.html?page=20&contrast=
  • (FCCs) report on telephone subscribership in the... * [81]Third Broadband Progress Report 02.07.2002 The FCC released its third report on the availability of advanced telecommunications capability... * [82]High Speed Services for Internet Access (As of 06/30/01) 02.01.2002 We summarize here information from the fourth data collection, thereby presenting a snapshot of... * [83]Quarterly Inquiries and Complaints Report (1st Qtr, 2002) 01.17.2002 This report tracks the top subject areas for consumer inquiries and complaints received during the... * [84]8th Annual Video Competition Report 01.14.2002 This is the Commissions eighth annual report (2001 Report) to Congress on the status of ... * [85]Quality of Service Report of the Local Operating Companies (1999-2000) 12.05.2001 This report summarizes various kinds of service quality data filed
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/fcc2008budget.html?page=20&contrast=highContrast
  • (FCCs) report on telephone subscribership in the... * [81]Third Broadband Progress Report 02.07.2002 The FCC released its third report on the availability of advanced telecommunications capability... * [82]High Speed Services for Internet Access (As of 06/30/01) 02.01.2002 We summarize here information from the fourth data collection, thereby presenting a snapshot of... * [83]Quarterly Inquiries and Complaints Report (1st Qtr, 2002) 01.17.2002 This report tracks the top subject areas for consumer inquiries and complaints received during the... * [84]8th Annual Video Competition Report 01.14.2002 This is the Commissions eighth annual report (2001 Report) to Congress on the status of ... * [85]Quality of Service Report of the Local Operating Companies (1999-2000) 12.05.2001 This report summarizes various kinds of service quality data filed
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/fcc2008budget.html?page=20&fontsize=
  • (FCCs) report on telephone subscribership in the... * [81]Third Broadband Progress Report 02.07.2002 The FCC released its third report on the availability of advanced telecommunications capability... * [82]High Speed Services for Internet Access (As of 06/30/01) 02.01.2002 We summarize here information from the fourth data collection, thereby presenting a snapshot of... * [83]Quarterly Inquiries and Complaints Report (1st Qtr, 2002) 01.17.2002 This report tracks the top subject areas for consumer inquiries and complaints received during the... * [84]8th Annual Video Competition Report 01.14.2002 This is the Commissions eighth annual report (2001 Report) to Congress on the status of ... * [85]Quality of Service Report of the Local Operating Companies (1999-2000) 12.05.2001 This report summarizes various kinds of service quality data filed
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/fcc2008budget.html?page=20&fontsize=largeFont
  • (FCCs) report on telephone subscribership in the... * [81]Third Broadband Progress Report 02.07.2002 The FCC released its third report on the availability of advanced telecommunications capability... * [82]High Speed Services for Internet Access (As of 06/30/01) 02.01.2002 We summarize here information from the fourth data collection, thereby presenting a snapshot of... * [83]Quarterly Inquiries and Complaints Report (1st Qtr, 2002) 01.17.2002 This report tracks the top subject areas for consumer inquiries and complaints received during the... * [84]8th Annual Video Competition Report 01.14.2002 This is the Commissions eighth annual report (2001 Report) to Congress on the status of ... * [85]Quality of Service Report of the Local Operating Companies (1999-2000) 12.05.2001 This report summarizes various kinds of service quality data filed
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/fcc2008budget.html?page=20&fontsize=mediumFont
  • (FCCs) report on telephone subscribership in the... * [81]Third Broadband Progress Report 02.07.2002 The FCC released its third report on the availability of advanced telecommunications capability... * [82]High Speed Services for Internet Access (As of 06/30/01) 02.01.2002 We summarize here information from the fourth data collection, thereby presenting a snapshot of... * [83]Quarterly Inquiries and Complaints Report (1st Qtr, 2002) 01.17.2002 This report tracks the top subject areas for consumer inquiries and complaints received during the... * [84]8th Annual Video Competition Report 01.14.2002 This is the Commissions eighth annual report (2001 Report) to Congress on the status of ... * [85]Quality of Service Report of the Local Operating Companies (1999-2000) 12.05.2001 This report summarizes various kinds of service quality data filed
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/fcc2008budget.html?page=4
  • 43.61 International Traffic Data Reports [_] Statistics of Communications Common Carrier Reports [_] Telephone Penetration Reports [_] Telephone Subscribership Reports [_] Trends in Telephony Service [_] Video Competition Reports Apply Filter * [79]Telephone Subscribership Report (through November 2009) 02.02.2010 This is the Federal Communications Commissions (FCCs) report on telephone subscribership in... * [80]Quarterly Inquiries and Complaints Report (1st Qtr, 2010) 01.17.2010 This report tracks the top subject areas for consumer inquiries and complaints received during the... * [81]Quality of Service Report of the Local Operating Companies (2007-2008) 12.24.2009 This report summarizes the Automated Reporting Management Information System (ARMIS) service... * [82]Telephone Subscribership Report (through July 2009) 12.15.2009 This is the Federal Communications Commissions (FCCs) report on telephone subscribership in... * [83]Quarterly
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/fcc2008budget.html?page=4&contrast=
  • 43.61 International Traffic Data Reports [_] Statistics of Communications Common Carrier Reports [_] Telephone Penetration Reports [_] Telephone Subscribership Reports [_] Trends in Telephony Service [_] Video Competition Reports Apply Filter * [79]Telephone Subscribership Report (through November 2009) 02.02.2010 This is the Federal Communications Commissions (FCCs) report on telephone subscribership in... * [80]Quarterly Inquiries and Complaints Report (1st Qtr, 2010) 01.17.2010 This report tracks the top subject areas for consumer inquiries and complaints received during the... * [81]Quality of Service Report of the Local Operating Companies (2007-2008) 12.24.2009 This report summarizes the Automated Reporting Management Information System (ARMIS) service... * [82]Telephone Subscribership Report (through July 2009) 12.15.2009 This is the Federal Communications Commissions (FCCs) report on telephone subscribership in... * [83]Quarterly
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/fcc2008budget.html?page=4&contrast=highContrast
  • 43.61 International Traffic Data Reports [_] Statistics of Communications Common Carrier Reports [_] Telephone Penetration Reports [_] Telephone Subscribership Reports [_] Trends in Telephony Service [_] Video Competition Reports Apply Filter * [79]Telephone Subscribership Report (through November 2009) 02.02.2010 This is the Federal Communications Commissions (FCCs) report on telephone subscribership in... * [80]Quarterly Inquiries and Complaints Report (1st Qtr, 2010) 01.17.2010 This report tracks the top subject areas for consumer inquiries and complaints received during the... * [81]Quality of Service Report of the Local Operating Companies (2007-2008) 12.24.2009 This report summarizes the Automated Reporting Management Information System (ARMIS) service... * [82]Telephone Subscribership Report (through July 2009) 12.15.2009 This is the Federal Communications Commissions (FCCs) report on telephone subscribership in... * [83]Quarterly
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/fcc2008budget.html?page=4&fontsize=
  • 43.61 International Traffic Data Reports [_] Statistics of Communications Common Carrier Reports [_] Telephone Penetration Reports [_] Telephone Subscribership Reports [_] Trends in Telephony Service [_] Video Competition Reports Apply Filter * [79]Telephone Subscribership Report (through November 2009) 02.02.2010 This is the Federal Communications Commissions (FCCs) report on telephone subscribership in... * [80]Quarterly Inquiries and Complaints Report (1st Qtr, 2010) 01.17.2010 This report tracks the top subject areas for consumer inquiries and complaints received during the... * [81]Quality of Service Report of the Local Operating Companies (2007-2008) 12.24.2009 This report summarizes the Automated Reporting Management Information System (ARMIS) service... * [82]Telephone Subscribership Report (through July 2009) 12.15.2009 This is the Federal Communications Commissions (FCCs) report on telephone subscribership in... * [83]Quarterly
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/fcc2008budget.html?page=4&fontsize=largeFont
  • 43.61 International Traffic Data Reports [_] Statistics of Communications Common Carrier Reports [_] Telephone Penetration Reports [_] Telephone Subscribership Reports [_] Trends in Telephony Service [_] Video Competition Reports Apply Filter * [79]Telephone Subscribership Report (through November 2009) 02.02.2010 This is the Federal Communications Commissions (FCCs) report on telephone subscribership in... * [80]Quarterly Inquiries and Complaints Report (1st Qtr, 2010) 01.17.2010 This report tracks the top subject areas for consumer inquiries and complaints received during the... * [81]Quality of Service Report of the Local Operating Companies (2007-2008) 12.24.2009 This report summarizes the Automated Reporting Management Information System (ARMIS) service... * [82]Telephone Subscribership Report (through July 2009) 12.15.2009 This is the Federal Communications Commissions (FCCs) report on telephone subscribership in... * [83]Quarterly
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/fcc2008budget.html?page=4&fontsize=mediumFont
  • 43.61 International Traffic Data Reports [_] Statistics of Communications Common Carrier Reports [_] Telephone Penetration Reports [_] Telephone Subscribership Reports [_] Trends in Telephony Service [_] Video Competition Reports Apply Filter * [79]Telephone Subscribership Report (through November 2009) 02.02.2010 This is the Federal Communications Commissions (FCCs) report on telephone subscribership in... * [80]Quarterly Inquiries and Complaints Report (1st Qtr, 2010) 01.17.2010 This report tracks the top subject areas for consumer inquiries and complaints received during the... * [81]Quality of Service Report of the Local Operating Companies (2007-2008) 12.24.2009 This report summarizes the Automated Reporting Management Information System (ARMIS) service... * [82]Telephone Subscribership Report (through July 2009) 12.15.2009 This is the Federal Communications Commissions (FCCs) report on telephone subscribership in... * [83]Quarterly
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/fcc2008budget.html?page=9
  • its annual year-end circuit status report for U.... * [86]Trends in Telephony Service (2007) 02.01.2007 Trends in Telephone Service is published by the Industry Analysis and Technology Division of... * [87]High Speed Services for Internet Access (As of 06/30/06) 01.31.2007 We summarize here information from the fourteenth semi-annual data collection, thereby presenting a... * [88]Telephone Subscribership Report (through July 2006) 01.17.2007 This is the Federal Communications Commissions (FCCs) report on telephone subscribership in... * [89] * [90] * * [91]6 * [92]7 * [93]8 * [94]9 * 10 * [95]11 * [96]12 * [97]13 * [98]14 * * [99] * [100] Connect * [101]Facebook * [102]Twitter * [103]YouTube * [104]Flickr Share this page * Reddit * Digg * Facebook * Twitter
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/fcc2008budget.html?page=9&contrast=
  • its annual year-end circuit status report for U.... * [86]Trends in Telephony Service (2007) 02.01.2007 Trends in Telephone Service is published by the Industry Analysis and Technology Division of... * [87]High Speed Services for Internet Access (As of 06/30/06) 01.31.2007 We summarize here information from the fourteenth semi-annual data collection, thereby presenting a... * [88]Telephone Subscribership Report (through July 2006) 01.17.2007 This is the Federal Communications Commissions (FCCs) report on telephone subscribership in... * [89] * [90] * * [91]6 * [92]7 * [93]8 * [94]9 * 10 * [95]11 * [96]12 * [97]13 * [98]14 * * [99] * [100] Connect * [101]Facebook * [102]Twitter * [103]YouTube * [104]Flickr Share this page * Reddit * Digg * Facebook * Twitter
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/fcc2008budget.html?page=9&contrast=highContrast
  • its annual year-end circuit status report for U.... * [86]Trends in Telephony Service (2007) 02.01.2007 Trends in Telephone Service is published by the Industry Analysis and Technology Division of... * [87]High Speed Services for Internet Access (As of 06/30/06) 01.31.2007 We summarize here information from the fourteenth semi-annual data collection, thereby presenting a... * [88]Telephone Subscribership Report (through July 2006) 01.17.2007 This is the Federal Communications Commissions (FCCs) report on telephone subscribership in... * [89] * [90] * * [91]6 * [92]7 * [93]8 * [94]9 * 10 * [95]11 * [96]12 * [97]13 * [98]14 * * [99] * [100] Connect * [101]Facebook * [102]Twitter * [103]YouTube * [104]Flickr Share this page * Reddit * Digg * Facebook * Twitter
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/fcc2008budget.html?page=9&fontsize=
  • its annual year-end circuit status report for U.... * [86]Trends in Telephony Service (2007) 02.01.2007 Trends in Telephone Service is published by the Industry Analysis and Technology Division of... * [87]High Speed Services for Internet Access (As of 06/30/06) 01.31.2007 We summarize here information from the fourteenth semi-annual data collection, thereby presenting a... * [88]Telephone Subscribership Report (through July 2006) 01.17.2007 This is the Federal Communications Commissions (FCCs) report on telephone subscribership in... * [89] * [90] * * [91]6 * [92]7 * [93]8 * [94]9 * 10 * [95]11 * [96]12 * [97]13 * [98]14 * * [99] * [100] Connect * [101]Facebook * [102]Twitter * [103]YouTube * [104]Flickr Share this page * Reddit * Digg * Facebook * Twitter
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/fcc2008budget.html?page=9&fontsize=largeFont
  • its annual year-end circuit status report for U.... * [86]Trends in Telephony Service (2007) 02.01.2007 Trends in Telephone Service is published by the Industry Analysis and Technology Division of... * [87]High Speed Services for Internet Access (As of 06/30/06) 01.31.2007 We summarize here information from the fourteenth semi-annual data collection, thereby presenting a... * [88]Telephone Subscribership Report (through July 2006) 01.17.2007 This is the Federal Communications Commissions (FCCs) report on telephone subscribership in... * [89] * [90] * * [91]6 * [92]7 * [93]8 * [94]9 * 10 * [95]11 * [96]12 * [97]13 * [98]14 * * [99] * [100] Connect * [101]Facebook * [102]Twitter * [103]YouTube * [104]Flickr Share this page * Reddit * Digg * Facebook * Twitter
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/fcc2008budget.html?page=9&fontsize=mediumFont
  • its annual year-end circuit status report for U.... * [86]Trends in Telephony Service (2007) 02.01.2007 Trends in Telephone Service is published by the Industry Analysis and Technology Division of... * [87]High Speed Services for Internet Access (As of 06/30/06) 01.31.2007 We summarize here information from the fourteenth semi-annual data collection, thereby presenting a... * [88]Telephone Subscribership Report (through July 2006) 01.17.2007 This is the Federal Communications Commissions (FCCs) report on telephone subscribership in... * [89] * [90] * * [91]6 * [92]7 * [93]8 * [94]9 * 10 * [95]11 * [96]12 * [97]13 * [98]14 * * [99] * [100] Connect * [101]Facebook * [102]Twitter * [103]YouTube * [104]Flickr Share this page * Reddit * Digg * Facebook * Twitter
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/fcc2009budget.html?page=10
  • to Congress as required by the Orbit Act [_] Satellite Competition Reports [_] Section 257 Triennial Reports [_] Section 43.61 International Traffic Data Reports [_] Statistics of Communications Common Carrier Reports [_] Telephone Penetration Reports [_] Telephone Subscribership Reports [_] Trends in Telephony Service [_] Video Competition Reports Apply Filter * [79]Numbering Resource Utilization in the U.S. (As of 12/31/05) 01.17.2007 This is the Federal Communications Commissions report on numbering resource utilization in... * [80]Local Telephone Competition (As of 06/30/06) 01.07.2007 We present here summary statistics of the latest data on local telephone service competition in... * [81]Report on Cable Industry Prices (2005) 12.27.2006 Section 623(k) of the Communications Act, as amended by the Cable Television Consumer ... * [82]Commercial Mobile
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/fcc2009budget.html?page=10&contrast=
  • to Congress as required by the Orbit Act [_] Satellite Competition Reports [_] Section 257 Triennial Reports [_] Section 43.61 International Traffic Data Reports [_] Statistics of Communications Common Carrier Reports [_] Telephone Penetration Reports [_] Telephone Subscribership Reports [_] Trends in Telephony Service [_] Video Competition Reports Apply Filter * [79]Numbering Resource Utilization in the U.S. (As of 12/31/05) 01.17.2007 This is the Federal Communications Commissions report on numbering resource utilization in... * [80]Local Telephone Competition (As of 06/30/06) 01.07.2007 We present here summary statistics of the latest data on local telephone service competition in... * [81]Report on Cable Industry Prices (2005) 12.27.2006 Section 623(k) of the Communications Act, as amended by the Cable Television Consumer ... * [82]Commercial Mobile
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/fcc2009budget.html?page=10&contrast=highContrast
  • to Congress as required by the Orbit Act [_] Satellite Competition Reports [_] Section 257 Triennial Reports [_] Section 43.61 International Traffic Data Reports [_] Statistics of Communications Common Carrier Reports [_] Telephone Penetration Reports [_] Telephone Subscribership Reports [_] Trends in Telephony Service [_] Video Competition Reports Apply Filter * [79]Numbering Resource Utilization in the U.S. (As of 12/31/05) 01.17.2007 This is the Federal Communications Commissions report on numbering resource utilization in... * [80]Local Telephone Competition (As of 06/30/06) 01.07.2007 We present here summary statistics of the latest data on local telephone service competition in... * [81]Report on Cable Industry Prices (2005) 12.27.2006 Section 623(k) of the Communications Act, as amended by the Cable Television Consumer ... * [82]Commercial Mobile
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/fcc2009budget.html?page=10&fontsize=
  • to Congress as required by the Orbit Act [_] Satellite Competition Reports [_] Section 257 Triennial Reports [_] Section 43.61 International Traffic Data Reports [_] Statistics of Communications Common Carrier Reports [_] Telephone Penetration Reports [_] Telephone Subscribership Reports [_] Trends in Telephony Service [_] Video Competition Reports Apply Filter * [79]Numbering Resource Utilization in the U.S. (As of 12/31/05) 01.17.2007 This is the Federal Communications Commissions report on numbering resource utilization in... * [80]Local Telephone Competition (As of 06/30/06) 01.07.2007 We present here summary statistics of the latest data on local telephone service competition in... * [81]Report on Cable Industry Prices (2005) 12.27.2006 Section 623(k) of the Communications Act, as amended by the Cable Television Consumer ... * [82]Commercial Mobile
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/fcc2009budget.html?page=10&fontsize=largeFont
  • to Congress as required by the Orbit Act [_] Satellite Competition Reports [_] Section 257 Triennial Reports [_] Section 43.61 International Traffic Data Reports [_] Statistics of Communications Common Carrier Reports [_] Telephone Penetration Reports [_] Telephone Subscribership Reports [_] Trends in Telephony Service [_] Video Competition Reports Apply Filter * [79]Numbering Resource Utilization in the U.S. (As of 12/31/05) 01.17.2007 This is the Federal Communications Commissions report on numbering resource utilization in... * [80]Local Telephone Competition (As of 06/30/06) 01.07.2007 We present here summary statistics of the latest data on local telephone service competition in... * [81]Report on Cable Industry Prices (2005) 12.27.2006 Section 623(k) of the Communications Act, as amended by the Cable Television Consumer ... * [82]Commercial Mobile
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/fcc2009budget.html?page=10&fontsize=mediumFont
  • to Congress as required by the Orbit Act [_] Satellite Competition Reports [_] Section 257 Triennial Reports [_] Section 43.61 International Traffic Data Reports [_] Statistics of Communications Common Carrier Reports [_] Telephone Penetration Reports [_] Telephone Subscribership Reports [_] Trends in Telephony Service [_] Video Competition Reports Apply Filter * [79]Numbering Resource Utilization in the U.S. (As of 12/31/05) 01.17.2007 This is the Federal Communications Commissions report on numbering resource utilization in... * [80]Local Telephone Competition (As of 06/30/06) 01.07.2007 We present here summary statistics of the latest data on local telephone service competition in... * [81]Report on Cable Industry Prices (2005) 12.27.2006 Section 623(k) of the Communications Act, as amended by the Cable Television Consumer ... * [82]Commercial Mobile
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/fcc2009budget.html?page=18
  • 43.61 International Traffic Data Reports [_] Statistics of Communications Common Carrier Reports [_] Telephone Penetration Reports [_] Telephone Subscribership Reports [_] Trends in Telephony Service [_] Video Competition Reports Apply Filter * [79]Telephone Subscribership Report (through July 2002) 02.12.2003 This is the Federal Communications Commissions (FCCs) report on telephone subscribership in... * [80]Quarterly Inquiries and Complaints Report (1st Qtr, 2003) 01.17.2003 This report tracks the top subject areas for consumer inquiries and complaints received during the... * [81]Quality of Service Report of the Local Operating Companies (2000-2001) 01.03.2003 This report summarizes various kinds of service quality data filed by certain incumbent local... * [82]9th Annual Video Competition Report 12.31.2002 This is the Commissions ninth annual report (2002 Report) to Congress on
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/fcc2009budget.html?page=18&contrast=
  • 43.61 International Traffic Data Reports [_] Statistics of Communications Common Carrier Reports [_] Telephone Penetration Reports [_] Telephone Subscribership Reports [_] Trends in Telephony Service [_] Video Competition Reports Apply Filter * [79]Telephone Subscribership Report (through July 2002) 02.12.2003 This is the Federal Communications Commissions (FCCs) report on telephone subscribership in... * [80]Quarterly Inquiries and Complaints Report (1st Qtr, 2003) 01.17.2003 This report tracks the top subject areas for consumer inquiries and complaints received during the... * [81]Quality of Service Report of the Local Operating Companies (2000-2001) 01.03.2003 This report summarizes various kinds of service quality data filed by certain incumbent local... * [82]9th Annual Video Competition Report 12.31.2002 This is the Commissions ninth annual report (2002 Report) to Congress on
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/fcc2009budget.html?page=18&contrast=highContrast
  • 43.61 International Traffic Data Reports [_] Statistics of Communications Common Carrier Reports [_] Telephone Penetration Reports [_] Telephone Subscribership Reports [_] Trends in Telephony Service [_] Video Competition Reports Apply Filter * [79]Telephone Subscribership Report (through July 2002) 02.12.2003 This is the Federal Communications Commissions (FCCs) report on telephone subscribership in... * [80]Quarterly Inquiries and Complaints Report (1st Qtr, 2003) 01.17.2003 This report tracks the top subject areas for consumer inquiries and complaints received during the... * [81]Quality of Service Report of the Local Operating Companies (2000-2001) 01.03.2003 This report summarizes various kinds of service quality data filed by certain incumbent local... * [82]9th Annual Video Competition Report 12.31.2002 This is the Commissions ninth annual report (2002 Report) to Congress on
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/fcc2009budget.html?page=18&fontsize=
  • 43.61 International Traffic Data Reports [_] Statistics of Communications Common Carrier Reports [_] Telephone Penetration Reports [_] Telephone Subscribership Reports [_] Trends in Telephony Service [_] Video Competition Reports Apply Filter * [79]Telephone Subscribership Report (through July 2002) 02.12.2003 This is the Federal Communications Commissions (FCCs) report on telephone subscribership in... * [80]Quarterly Inquiries and Complaints Report (1st Qtr, 2003) 01.17.2003 This report tracks the top subject areas for consumer inquiries and complaints received during the... * [81]Quality of Service Report of the Local Operating Companies (2000-2001) 01.03.2003 This report summarizes various kinds of service quality data filed by certain incumbent local... * [82]9th Annual Video Competition Report 12.31.2002 This is the Commissions ninth annual report (2002 Report) to Congress on
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/fcc2009budget.html?page=18&fontsize=largeFont
  • 43.61 International Traffic Data Reports [_] Statistics of Communications Common Carrier Reports [_] Telephone Penetration Reports [_] Telephone Subscribership Reports [_] Trends in Telephony Service [_] Video Competition Reports Apply Filter * [79]Telephone Subscribership Report (through July 2002) 02.12.2003 This is the Federal Communications Commissions (FCCs) report on telephone subscribership in... * [80]Quarterly Inquiries and Complaints Report (1st Qtr, 2003) 01.17.2003 This report tracks the top subject areas for consumer inquiries and complaints received during the... * [81]Quality of Service Report of the Local Operating Companies (2000-2001) 01.03.2003 This report summarizes various kinds of service quality data filed by certain incumbent local... * [82]9th Annual Video Competition Report 12.31.2002 This is the Commissions ninth annual report (2002 Report) to Congress on
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/fcc2009budget.html?page=18&fontsize=mediumFont
  • 43.61 International Traffic Data Reports [_] Statistics of Communications Common Carrier Reports [_] Telephone Penetration Reports [_] Telephone Subscribership Reports [_] Trends in Telephony Service [_] Video Competition Reports Apply Filter * [79]Telephone Subscribership Report (through July 2002) 02.12.2003 This is the Federal Communications Commissions (FCCs) report on telephone subscribership in... * [80]Quarterly Inquiries and Complaints Report (1st Qtr, 2003) 01.17.2003 This report tracks the top subject areas for consumer inquiries and complaints received during the... * [81]Quality of Service Report of the Local Operating Companies (2000-2001) 01.03.2003 This report summarizes various kinds of service quality data filed by certain incumbent local... * [82]9th Annual Video Competition Report 12.31.2002 This is the Commissions ninth annual report (2002 Report) to Congress on
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/fcc2009budget.html?page=20
  • (FCCs) report on telephone subscribership in the... * [81]Third Broadband Progress Report 02.07.2002 The FCC released its third report on the availability of advanced telecommunications capability... * [82]High Speed Services for Internet Access (As of 06/30/01) 02.01.2002 We summarize here information from the fourth data collection, thereby presenting a snapshot of... * [83]Quarterly Inquiries and Complaints Report (1st Qtr, 2002) 01.17.2002 This report tracks the top subject areas for consumer inquiries and complaints received during the... * [84]8th Annual Video Competition Report 01.14.2002 This is the Commissions eighth annual report (2001 Report) to Congress on the status of ... * [85]Quality of Service Report of the Local Operating Companies (1999-2000) 12.05.2001 This report summarizes various kinds of service quality data filed
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/fcc2009budget.html?page=20&contrast=
  • (FCCs) report on telephone subscribership in the... * [81]Third Broadband Progress Report 02.07.2002 The FCC released its third report on the availability of advanced telecommunications capability... * [82]High Speed Services for Internet Access (As of 06/30/01) 02.01.2002 We summarize here information from the fourth data collection, thereby presenting a snapshot of... * [83]Quarterly Inquiries and Complaints Report (1st Qtr, 2002) 01.17.2002 This report tracks the top subject areas for consumer inquiries and complaints received during the... * [84]8th Annual Video Competition Report 01.14.2002 This is the Commissions eighth annual report (2001 Report) to Congress on the status of ... * [85]Quality of Service Report of the Local Operating Companies (1999-2000) 12.05.2001 This report summarizes various kinds of service quality data filed
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/fcc2009budget.html?page=20&contrast=highContrast
  • (FCCs) report on telephone subscribership in the... * [81]Third Broadband Progress Report 02.07.2002 The FCC released its third report on the availability of advanced telecommunications capability... * [82]High Speed Services for Internet Access (As of 06/30/01) 02.01.2002 We summarize here information from the fourth data collection, thereby presenting a snapshot of... * [83]Quarterly Inquiries and Complaints Report (1st Qtr, 2002) 01.17.2002 This report tracks the top subject areas for consumer inquiries and complaints received during the... * [84]8th Annual Video Competition Report 01.14.2002 This is the Commissions eighth annual report (2001 Report) to Congress on the status of ... * [85]Quality of Service Report of the Local Operating Companies (1999-2000) 12.05.2001 This report summarizes various kinds of service quality data filed
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/fcc2009budget.html?page=20&fontsize=
  • (FCCs) report on telephone subscribership in the... * [81]Third Broadband Progress Report 02.07.2002 The FCC released its third report on the availability of advanced telecommunications capability... * [82]High Speed Services for Internet Access (As of 06/30/01) 02.01.2002 We summarize here information from the fourth data collection, thereby presenting a snapshot of... * [83]Quarterly Inquiries and Complaints Report (1st Qtr, 2002) 01.17.2002 This report tracks the top subject areas for consumer inquiries and complaints received during the... * [84]8th Annual Video Competition Report 01.14.2002 This is the Commissions eighth annual report (2001 Report) to Congress on the status of ... * [85]Quality of Service Report of the Local Operating Companies (1999-2000) 12.05.2001 This report summarizes various kinds of service quality data filed
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/fcc2009budget.html?page=20&fontsize=largeFont
  • (FCCs) report on telephone subscribership in the... * [81]Third Broadband Progress Report 02.07.2002 The FCC released its third report on the availability of advanced telecommunications capability... * [82]High Speed Services for Internet Access (As of 06/30/01) 02.01.2002 We summarize here information from the fourth data collection, thereby presenting a snapshot of... * [83]Quarterly Inquiries and Complaints Report (1st Qtr, 2002) 01.17.2002 This report tracks the top subject areas for consumer inquiries and complaints received during the... * [84]8th Annual Video Competition Report 01.14.2002 This is the Commissions eighth annual report (2001 Report) to Congress on the status of ... * [85]Quality of Service Report of the Local Operating Companies (1999-2000) 12.05.2001 This report summarizes various kinds of service quality data filed
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/fcc2009budget.html?page=20&fontsize=mediumFont
  • (FCCs) report on telephone subscribership in the... * [81]Third Broadband Progress Report 02.07.2002 The FCC released its third report on the availability of advanced telecommunications capability... * [82]High Speed Services for Internet Access (As of 06/30/01) 02.01.2002 We summarize here information from the fourth data collection, thereby presenting a snapshot of... * [83]Quarterly Inquiries and Complaints Report (1st Qtr, 2002) 01.17.2002 This report tracks the top subject areas for consumer inquiries and complaints received during the... * [84]8th Annual Video Competition Report 01.14.2002 This is the Commissions eighth annual report (2001 Report) to Congress on the status of ... * [85]Quality of Service Report of the Local Operating Companies (1999-2000) 12.05.2001 This report summarizes various kinds of service quality data filed
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/fcc2009budget.html?page=4
  • 43.61 International Traffic Data Reports [_] Statistics of Communications Common Carrier Reports [_] Telephone Penetration Reports [_] Telephone Subscribership Reports [_] Trends in Telephony Service [_] Video Competition Reports Apply Filter * [79]Telephone Subscribership Report (through November 2009) 02.02.2010 This is the Federal Communications Commissions (FCCs) report on telephone subscribership in... * [80]Quarterly Inquiries and Complaints Report (1st Qtr, 2010) 01.17.2010 This report tracks the top subject areas for consumer inquiries and complaints received during the... * [81]Quality of Service Report of the Local Operating Companies (2007-2008) 12.24.2009 This report summarizes the Automated Reporting Management Information System (ARMIS) service... * [82]Telephone Subscribership Report (through July 2009) 12.15.2009 This is the Federal Communications Commissions (FCCs) report on telephone subscribership in... * [83]Quarterly
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/fcc2009budget.html?page=4&contrast=
  • 43.61 International Traffic Data Reports [_] Statistics of Communications Common Carrier Reports [_] Telephone Penetration Reports [_] Telephone Subscribership Reports [_] Trends in Telephony Service [_] Video Competition Reports Apply Filter * [79]Telephone Subscribership Report (through November 2009) 02.02.2010 This is the Federal Communications Commissions (FCCs) report on telephone subscribership in... * [80]Quarterly Inquiries and Complaints Report (1st Qtr, 2010) 01.17.2010 This report tracks the top subject areas for consumer inquiries and complaints received during the... * [81]Quality of Service Report of the Local Operating Companies (2007-2008) 12.24.2009 This report summarizes the Automated Reporting Management Information System (ARMIS) service... * [82]Telephone Subscribership Report (through July 2009) 12.15.2009 This is the Federal Communications Commissions (FCCs) report on telephone subscribership in... * [83]Quarterly
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/fcc2009budget.html?page=4&contrast=highContrast
  • 43.61 International Traffic Data Reports [_] Statistics of Communications Common Carrier Reports [_] Telephone Penetration Reports [_] Telephone Subscribership Reports [_] Trends in Telephony Service [_] Video Competition Reports Apply Filter * [79]Telephone Subscribership Report (through November 2009) 02.02.2010 This is the Federal Communications Commissions (FCCs) report on telephone subscribership in... * [80]Quarterly Inquiries and Complaints Report (1st Qtr, 2010) 01.17.2010 This report tracks the top subject areas for consumer inquiries and complaints received during the... * [81]Quality of Service Report of the Local Operating Companies (2007-2008) 12.24.2009 This report summarizes the Automated Reporting Management Information System (ARMIS) service... * [82]Telephone Subscribership Report (through July 2009) 12.15.2009 This is the Federal Communications Commissions (FCCs) report on telephone subscribership in... * [83]Quarterly
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/fcc2009budget.html?page=4&fontsize=
  • 43.61 International Traffic Data Reports [_] Statistics of Communications Common Carrier Reports [_] Telephone Penetration Reports [_] Telephone Subscribership Reports [_] Trends in Telephony Service [_] Video Competition Reports Apply Filter * [79]Telephone Subscribership Report (through November 2009) 02.02.2010 This is the Federal Communications Commissions (FCCs) report on telephone subscribership in... * [80]Quarterly Inquiries and Complaints Report (1st Qtr, 2010) 01.17.2010 This report tracks the top subject areas for consumer inquiries and complaints received during the... * [81]Quality of Service Report of the Local Operating Companies (2007-2008) 12.24.2009 This report summarizes the Automated Reporting Management Information System (ARMIS) service... * [82]Telephone Subscribership Report (through July 2009) 12.15.2009 This is the Federal Communications Commissions (FCCs) report on telephone subscribership in... * [83]Quarterly
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/fcc2009budget.html?page=4&fontsize=largeFont
  • 43.61 International Traffic Data Reports [_] Statistics of Communications Common Carrier Reports [_] Telephone Penetration Reports [_] Telephone Subscribership Reports [_] Trends in Telephony Service [_] Video Competition Reports Apply Filter * [79]Telephone Subscribership Report (through November 2009) 02.02.2010 This is the Federal Communications Commissions (FCCs) report on telephone subscribership in... * [80]Quarterly Inquiries and Complaints Report (1st Qtr, 2010) 01.17.2010 This report tracks the top subject areas for consumer inquiries and complaints received during the... * [81]Quality of Service Report of the Local Operating Companies (2007-2008) 12.24.2009 This report summarizes the Automated Reporting Management Information System (ARMIS) service... * [82]Telephone Subscribership Report (through July 2009) 12.15.2009 This is the Federal Communications Commissions (FCCs) report on telephone subscribership in... * [83]Quarterly
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/fcc2009budget.html?page=4&fontsize=mediumFont
  • 43.61 International Traffic Data Reports [_] Statistics of Communications Common Carrier Reports [_] Telephone Penetration Reports [_] Telephone Subscribership Reports [_] Trends in Telephony Service [_] Video Competition Reports Apply Filter * [79]Telephone Subscribership Report (through November 2009) 02.02.2010 This is the Federal Communications Commissions (FCCs) report on telephone subscribership in... * [80]Quarterly Inquiries and Complaints Report (1st Qtr, 2010) 01.17.2010 This report tracks the top subject areas for consumer inquiries and complaints received during the... * [81]Quality of Service Report of the Local Operating Companies (2007-2008) 12.24.2009 This report summarizes the Automated Reporting Management Information System (ARMIS) service... * [82]Telephone Subscribership Report (through July 2009) 12.15.2009 This is the Federal Communications Commissions (FCCs) report on telephone subscribership in... * [83]Quarterly
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/fcc2009budget.html?page=9
  • its annual year-end circuit status report for U.... * [86]Trends in Telephony Service (2007) 02.01.2007 Trends in Telephone Service is published by the Industry Analysis and Technology Division of... * [87]High Speed Services for Internet Access (As of 06/30/06) 01.31.2007 We summarize here information from the fourteenth semi-annual data collection, thereby presenting a... * [88]Telephone Subscribership Report (through July 2006) 01.17.2007 This is the Federal Communications Commissions (FCCs) report on telephone subscribership in... * [89] * [90] * * [91]6 * [92]7 * [93]8 * [94]9 * 10 * [95]11 * [96]12 * [97]13 * [98]14 * * [99] * [100] Connect * [101]Facebook * [102]Twitter * [103]YouTube * [104]Flickr Share this page * Reddit * Digg * Facebook * Twitter
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/fcc2009budget.html?page=9&contrast=
  • its annual year-end circuit status report for U.... * [86]Trends in Telephony Service (2007) 02.01.2007 Trends in Telephone Service is published by the Industry Analysis and Technology Division of... * [87]High Speed Services for Internet Access (As of 06/30/06) 01.31.2007 We summarize here information from the fourteenth semi-annual data collection, thereby presenting a... * [88]Telephone Subscribership Report (through July 2006) 01.17.2007 This is the Federal Communications Commissions (FCCs) report on telephone subscribership in... * [89] * [90] * * [91]6 * [92]7 * [93]8 * [94]9 * 10 * [95]11 * [96]12 * [97]13 * [98]14 * * [99] * [100] Connect * [101]Facebook * [102]Twitter * [103]YouTube * [104]Flickr Share this page * Reddit * Digg * Facebook * Twitter
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/fcc2009budget.html?page=9&contrast=highContrast
  • its annual year-end circuit status report for U.... * [86]Trends in Telephony Service (2007) 02.01.2007 Trends in Telephone Service is published by the Industry Analysis and Technology Division of... * [87]High Speed Services for Internet Access (As of 06/30/06) 01.31.2007 We summarize here information from the fourteenth semi-annual data collection, thereby presenting a... * [88]Telephone Subscribership Report (through July 2006) 01.17.2007 This is the Federal Communications Commissions (FCCs) report on telephone subscribership in... * [89] * [90] * * [91]6 * [92]7 * [93]8 * [94]9 * 10 * [95]11 * [96]12 * [97]13 * [98]14 * * [99] * [100] Connect * [101]Facebook * [102]Twitter * [103]YouTube * [104]Flickr Share this page * Reddit * Digg * Facebook * Twitter
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/fcc2009budget.html?page=9&fontsize=
  • its annual year-end circuit status report for U.... * [86]Trends in Telephony Service (2007) 02.01.2007 Trends in Telephone Service is published by the Industry Analysis and Technology Division of... * [87]High Speed Services for Internet Access (As of 06/30/06) 01.31.2007 We summarize here information from the fourteenth semi-annual data collection, thereby presenting a... * [88]Telephone Subscribership Report (through July 2006) 01.17.2007 This is the Federal Communications Commissions (FCCs) report on telephone subscribership in... * [89] * [90] * * [91]6 * [92]7 * [93]8 * [94]9 * 10 * [95]11 * [96]12 * [97]13 * [98]14 * * [99] * [100] Connect * [101]Facebook * [102]Twitter * [103]YouTube * [104]Flickr Share this page * Reddit * Digg * Facebook * Twitter
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/fcc2009budget.html?page=9&fontsize=largeFont
  • its annual year-end circuit status report for U.... * [86]Trends in Telephony Service (2007) 02.01.2007 Trends in Telephone Service is published by the Industry Analysis and Technology Division of... * [87]High Speed Services for Internet Access (As of 06/30/06) 01.31.2007 We summarize here information from the fourteenth semi-annual data collection, thereby presenting a... * [88]Telephone Subscribership Report (through July 2006) 01.17.2007 This is the Federal Communications Commissions (FCCs) report on telephone subscribership in... * [89] * [90] * * [91]6 * [92]7 * [93]8 * [94]9 * 10 * [95]11 * [96]12 * [97]13 * [98]14 * * [99] * [100] Connect * [101]Facebook * [102]Twitter * [103]YouTube * [104]Flickr Share this page * Reddit * Digg * Facebook * Twitter
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/fcc2009budget.html?page=9&fontsize=mediumFont
  • its annual year-end circuit status report for U.... * [86]Trends in Telephony Service (2007) 02.01.2007 Trends in Telephone Service is published by the Industry Analysis and Technology Division of... * [87]High Speed Services for Internet Access (As of 06/30/06) 01.31.2007 We summarize here information from the fourteenth semi-annual data collection, thereby presenting a... * [88]Telephone Subscribership Report (through July 2006) 01.17.2007 This is the Federal Communications Commissions (FCCs) report on telephone subscribership in... * [89] * [90] * * [91]6 * [92]7 * [93]8 * [94]9 * 10 * [95]11 * [96]12 * [97]13 * [98]14 * * [99] * [100] Connect * [101]Facebook * [102]Twitter * [103]YouTube * [104]Flickr Share this page * Reddit * Digg * Facebook * Twitter
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/fcc21.html?page=10
  • to Congress as required by the Orbit Act [_] Satellite Competition Reports [_] Section 257 Triennial Reports [_] Section 43.61 International Traffic Data Reports [_] Statistics of Communications Common Carrier Reports [_] Telephone Penetration Reports [_] Telephone Subscribership Reports [_] Trends in Telephony Service [_] Video Competition Reports Apply Filter * [79]Numbering Resource Utilization in the U.S. (As of 12/31/05) 01.17.2007 This is the Federal Communications Commissions report on numbering resource utilization in... * [80]Local Telephone Competition (As of 06/30/06) 01.07.2007 We present here summary statistics of the latest data on local telephone service competition in... * [81]Report on Cable Industry Prices (2005) 12.27.2006 Section 623(k) of the Communications Act, as amended by the Cable Television Consumer ... * [82]Commercial Mobile
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/fcc21.html?page=10&contrast=
  • to Congress as required by the Orbit Act [_] Satellite Competition Reports [_] Section 257 Triennial Reports [_] Section 43.61 International Traffic Data Reports [_] Statistics of Communications Common Carrier Reports [_] Telephone Penetration Reports [_] Telephone Subscribership Reports [_] Trends in Telephony Service [_] Video Competition Reports Apply Filter * [79]Numbering Resource Utilization in the U.S. (As of 12/31/05) 01.17.2007 This is the Federal Communications Commissions report on numbering resource utilization in... * [80]Local Telephone Competition (As of 06/30/06) 01.07.2007 We present here summary statistics of the latest data on local telephone service competition in... * [81]Report on Cable Industry Prices (2005) 12.27.2006 Section 623(k) of the Communications Act, as amended by the Cable Television Consumer ... * [82]Commercial Mobile
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/fcc21.html?page=10&contrast=highContrast
  • to Congress as required by the Orbit Act [_] Satellite Competition Reports [_] Section 257 Triennial Reports [_] Section 43.61 International Traffic Data Reports [_] Statistics of Communications Common Carrier Reports [_] Telephone Penetration Reports [_] Telephone Subscribership Reports [_] Trends in Telephony Service [_] Video Competition Reports Apply Filter * [79]Numbering Resource Utilization in the U.S. (As of 12/31/05) 01.17.2007 This is the Federal Communications Commissions report on numbering resource utilization in... * [80]Local Telephone Competition (As of 06/30/06) 01.07.2007 We present here summary statistics of the latest data on local telephone service competition in... * [81]Report on Cable Industry Prices (2005) 12.27.2006 Section 623(k) of the Communications Act, as amended by the Cable Television Consumer ... * [82]Commercial Mobile
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/fcc21.html?page=10&fontsize=
  • to Congress as required by the Orbit Act [_] Satellite Competition Reports [_] Section 257 Triennial Reports [_] Section 43.61 International Traffic Data Reports [_] Statistics of Communications Common Carrier Reports [_] Telephone Penetration Reports [_] Telephone Subscribership Reports [_] Trends in Telephony Service [_] Video Competition Reports Apply Filter * [79]Numbering Resource Utilization in the U.S. (As of 12/31/05) 01.17.2007 This is the Federal Communications Commissions report on numbering resource utilization in... * [80]Local Telephone Competition (As of 06/30/06) 01.07.2007 We present here summary statistics of the latest data on local telephone service competition in... * [81]Report on Cable Industry Prices (2005) 12.27.2006 Section 623(k) of the Communications Act, as amended by the Cable Television Consumer ... * [82]Commercial Mobile
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/fcc21.html?page=10&fontsize=largeFont
  • to Congress as required by the Orbit Act [_] Satellite Competition Reports [_] Section 257 Triennial Reports [_] Section 43.61 International Traffic Data Reports [_] Statistics of Communications Common Carrier Reports [_] Telephone Penetration Reports [_] Telephone Subscribership Reports [_] Trends in Telephony Service [_] Video Competition Reports Apply Filter * [79]Numbering Resource Utilization in the U.S. (As of 12/31/05) 01.17.2007 This is the Federal Communications Commissions report on numbering resource utilization in... * [80]Local Telephone Competition (As of 06/30/06) 01.07.2007 We present here summary statistics of the latest data on local telephone service competition in... * [81]Report on Cable Industry Prices (2005) 12.27.2006 Section 623(k) of the Communications Act, as amended by the Cable Television Consumer ... * [82]Commercial Mobile
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/fcc21.html?page=10&fontsize=mediumFont
  • to Congress as required by the Orbit Act [_] Satellite Competition Reports [_] Section 257 Triennial Reports [_] Section 43.61 International Traffic Data Reports [_] Statistics of Communications Common Carrier Reports [_] Telephone Penetration Reports [_] Telephone Subscribership Reports [_] Trends in Telephony Service [_] Video Competition Reports Apply Filter * [79]Numbering Resource Utilization in the U.S. (As of 12/31/05) 01.17.2007 This is the Federal Communications Commissions report on numbering resource utilization in... * [80]Local Telephone Competition (As of 06/30/06) 01.07.2007 We present here summary statistics of the latest data on local telephone service competition in... * [81]Report on Cable Industry Prices (2005) 12.27.2006 Section 623(k) of the Communications Act, as amended by the Cable Television Consumer ... * [82]Commercial Mobile
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/fcc21.html?page=18
  • 43.61 International Traffic Data Reports [_] Statistics of Communications Common Carrier Reports [_] Telephone Penetration Reports [_] Telephone Subscribership Reports [_] Trends in Telephony Service [_] Video Competition Reports Apply Filter * [79]Telephone Subscribership Report (through July 2002) 02.12.2003 This is the Federal Communications Commissions (FCCs) report on telephone subscribership in... * [80]Quarterly Inquiries and Complaints Report (1st Qtr, 2003) 01.17.2003 This report tracks the top subject areas for consumer inquiries and complaints received during the... * [81]Quality of Service Report of the Local Operating Companies (2000-2001) 01.03.2003 This report summarizes various kinds of service quality data filed by certain incumbent local... * [82]9th Annual Video Competition Report 12.31.2002 This is the Commissions ninth annual report (2002 Report) to Congress on
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/fcc21.html?page=18&contrast=
  • 43.61 International Traffic Data Reports [_] Statistics of Communications Common Carrier Reports [_] Telephone Penetration Reports [_] Telephone Subscribership Reports [_] Trends in Telephony Service [_] Video Competition Reports Apply Filter * [79]Telephone Subscribership Report (through July 2002) 02.12.2003 This is the Federal Communications Commissions (FCCs) report on telephone subscribership in... * [80]Quarterly Inquiries and Complaints Report (1st Qtr, 2003) 01.17.2003 This report tracks the top subject areas for consumer inquiries and complaints received during the... * [81]Quality of Service Report of the Local Operating Companies (2000-2001) 01.03.2003 This report summarizes various kinds of service quality data filed by certain incumbent local... * [82]9th Annual Video Competition Report 12.31.2002 This is the Commissions ninth annual report (2002 Report) to Congress on
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/fcc21.html?page=18&contrast=highContrast
  • 43.61 International Traffic Data Reports [_] Statistics of Communications Common Carrier Reports [_] Telephone Penetration Reports [_] Telephone Subscribership Reports [_] Trends in Telephony Service [_] Video Competition Reports Apply Filter * [79]Telephone Subscribership Report (through July 2002) 02.12.2003 This is the Federal Communications Commissions (FCCs) report on telephone subscribership in... * [80]Quarterly Inquiries and Complaints Report (1st Qtr, 2003) 01.17.2003 This report tracks the top subject areas for consumer inquiries and complaints received during the... * [81]Quality of Service Report of the Local Operating Companies (2000-2001) 01.03.2003 This report summarizes various kinds of service quality data filed by certain incumbent local... * [82]9th Annual Video Competition Report 12.31.2002 This is the Commissions ninth annual report (2002 Report) to Congress on
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/fcc21.html?page=18&fontsize=
  • 43.61 International Traffic Data Reports [_] Statistics of Communications Common Carrier Reports [_] Telephone Penetration Reports [_] Telephone Subscribership Reports [_] Trends in Telephony Service [_] Video Competition Reports Apply Filter * [79]Telephone Subscribership Report (through July 2002) 02.12.2003 This is the Federal Communications Commissions (FCCs) report on telephone subscribership in... * [80]Quarterly Inquiries and Complaints Report (1st Qtr, 2003) 01.17.2003 This report tracks the top subject areas for consumer inquiries and complaints received during the... * [81]Quality of Service Report of the Local Operating Companies (2000-2001) 01.03.2003 This report summarizes various kinds of service quality data filed by certain incumbent local... * [82]9th Annual Video Competition Report 12.31.2002 This is the Commissions ninth annual report (2002 Report) to Congress on
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/fcc21.html?page=18&fontsize=largeFont
  • 43.61 International Traffic Data Reports [_] Statistics of Communications Common Carrier Reports [_] Telephone Penetration Reports [_] Telephone Subscribership Reports [_] Trends in Telephony Service [_] Video Competition Reports Apply Filter * [79]Telephone Subscribership Report (through July 2002) 02.12.2003 This is the Federal Communications Commissions (FCCs) report on telephone subscribership in... * [80]Quarterly Inquiries and Complaints Report (1st Qtr, 2003) 01.17.2003 This report tracks the top subject areas for consumer inquiries and complaints received during the... * [81]Quality of Service Report of the Local Operating Companies (2000-2001) 01.03.2003 This report summarizes various kinds of service quality data filed by certain incumbent local... * [82]9th Annual Video Competition Report 12.31.2002 This is the Commissions ninth annual report (2002 Report) to Congress on
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/fcc21.html?page=18&fontsize=mediumFont
  • 43.61 International Traffic Data Reports [_] Statistics of Communications Common Carrier Reports [_] Telephone Penetration Reports [_] Telephone Subscribership Reports [_] Trends in Telephony Service [_] Video Competition Reports Apply Filter * [79]Telephone Subscribership Report (through July 2002) 02.12.2003 This is the Federal Communications Commissions (FCCs) report on telephone subscribership in... * [80]Quarterly Inquiries and Complaints Report (1st Qtr, 2003) 01.17.2003 This report tracks the top subject areas for consumer inquiries and complaints received during the... * [81]Quality of Service Report of the Local Operating Companies (2000-2001) 01.03.2003 This report summarizes various kinds of service quality data filed by certain incumbent local... * [82]9th Annual Video Competition Report 12.31.2002 This is the Commissions ninth annual report (2002 Report) to Congress on
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/fcc21.html?page=20
  • (FCCs) report on telephone subscribership in the... * [81]Third Broadband Progress Report 02.07.2002 The FCC released its third report on the availability of advanced telecommunications capability... * [82]High Speed Services for Internet Access (As of 06/30/01) 02.01.2002 We summarize here information from the fourth data collection, thereby presenting a snapshot of... * [83]Quarterly Inquiries and Complaints Report (1st Qtr, 2002) 01.17.2002 This report tracks the top subject areas for consumer inquiries and complaints received during the... * [84]8th Annual Video Competition Report 01.14.2002 This is the Commissions eighth annual report (2001 Report) to Congress on the status of ... * [85]Quality of Service Report of the Local Operating Companies (1999-2000) 12.05.2001 This report summarizes various kinds of service quality data filed
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/fcc21.html?page=20&contrast=
  • (FCCs) report on telephone subscribership in the... * [81]Third Broadband Progress Report 02.07.2002 The FCC released its third report on the availability of advanced telecommunications capability... * [82]High Speed Services for Internet Access (As of 06/30/01) 02.01.2002 We summarize here information from the fourth data collection, thereby presenting a snapshot of... * [83]Quarterly Inquiries and Complaints Report (1st Qtr, 2002) 01.17.2002 This report tracks the top subject areas for consumer inquiries and complaints received during the... * [84]8th Annual Video Competition Report 01.14.2002 This is the Commissions eighth annual report (2001 Report) to Congress on the status of ... * [85]Quality of Service Report of the Local Operating Companies (1999-2000) 12.05.2001 This report summarizes various kinds of service quality data filed
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/fcc21.html?page=20&contrast=highContrast
  • (FCCs) report on telephone subscribership in the... * [81]Third Broadband Progress Report 02.07.2002 The FCC released its third report on the availability of advanced telecommunications capability... * [82]High Speed Services for Internet Access (As of 06/30/01) 02.01.2002 We summarize here information from the fourth data collection, thereby presenting a snapshot of... * [83]Quarterly Inquiries and Complaints Report (1st Qtr, 2002) 01.17.2002 This report tracks the top subject areas for consumer inquiries and complaints received during the... * [84]8th Annual Video Competition Report 01.14.2002 This is the Commissions eighth annual report (2001 Report) to Congress on the status of ... * [85]Quality of Service Report of the Local Operating Companies (1999-2000) 12.05.2001 This report summarizes various kinds of service quality data filed
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/fcc21.html?page=20&fontsize=
  • (FCCs) report on telephone subscribership in the... * [81]Third Broadband Progress Report 02.07.2002 The FCC released its third report on the availability of advanced telecommunications capability... * [82]High Speed Services for Internet Access (As of 06/30/01) 02.01.2002 We summarize here information from the fourth data collection, thereby presenting a snapshot of... * [83]Quarterly Inquiries and Complaints Report (1st Qtr, 2002) 01.17.2002 This report tracks the top subject areas for consumer inquiries and complaints received during the... * [84]8th Annual Video Competition Report 01.14.2002 This is the Commissions eighth annual report (2001 Report) to Congress on the status of ... * [85]Quality of Service Report of the Local Operating Companies (1999-2000) 12.05.2001 This report summarizes various kinds of service quality data filed
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/fcc21.html?page=20&fontsize=largeFont
  • (FCCs) report on telephone subscribership in the... * [81]Third Broadband Progress Report 02.07.2002 The FCC released its third report on the availability of advanced telecommunications capability... * [82]High Speed Services for Internet Access (As of 06/30/01) 02.01.2002 We summarize here information from the fourth data collection, thereby presenting a snapshot of... * [83]Quarterly Inquiries and Complaints Report (1st Qtr, 2002) 01.17.2002 This report tracks the top subject areas for consumer inquiries and complaints received during the... * [84]8th Annual Video Competition Report 01.14.2002 This is the Commissions eighth annual report (2001 Report) to Congress on the status of ... * [85]Quality of Service Report of the Local Operating Companies (1999-2000) 12.05.2001 This report summarizes various kinds of service quality data filed
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/fcc21.html?page=20&fontsize=mediumFont
  • (FCCs) report on telephone subscribership in the... * [81]Third Broadband Progress Report 02.07.2002 The FCC released its third report on the availability of advanced telecommunications capability... * [82]High Speed Services for Internet Access (As of 06/30/01) 02.01.2002 We summarize here information from the fourth data collection, thereby presenting a snapshot of... * [83]Quarterly Inquiries and Complaints Report (1st Qtr, 2002) 01.17.2002 This report tracks the top subject areas for consumer inquiries and complaints received during the... * [84]8th Annual Video Competition Report 01.14.2002 This is the Commissions eighth annual report (2001 Report) to Congress on the status of ... * [85]Quality of Service Report of the Local Operating Companies (1999-2000) 12.05.2001 This report summarizes various kinds of service quality data filed
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/fcc21.html?page=4
  • 43.61 International Traffic Data Reports [_] Statistics of Communications Common Carrier Reports [_] Telephone Penetration Reports [_] Telephone Subscribership Reports [_] Trends in Telephony Service [_] Video Competition Reports Apply Filter * [79]Telephone Subscribership Report (through November 2009) 02.02.2010 This is the Federal Communications Commissions (FCCs) report on telephone subscribership in... * [80]Quarterly Inquiries and Complaints Report (1st Qtr, 2010) 01.17.2010 This report tracks the top subject areas for consumer inquiries and complaints received during the... * [81]Quality of Service Report of the Local Operating Companies (2007-2008) 12.24.2009 This report summarizes the Automated Reporting Management Information System (ARMIS) service... * [82]Telephone Subscribership Report (through July 2009) 12.15.2009 This is the Federal Communications Commissions (FCCs) report on telephone subscribership in... * [83]Quarterly
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/fcc21.html?page=4&contrast=
  • 43.61 International Traffic Data Reports [_] Statistics of Communications Common Carrier Reports [_] Telephone Penetration Reports [_] Telephone Subscribership Reports [_] Trends in Telephony Service [_] Video Competition Reports Apply Filter * [79]Telephone Subscribership Report (through November 2009) 02.02.2010 This is the Federal Communications Commissions (FCCs) report on telephone subscribership in... * [80]Quarterly Inquiries and Complaints Report (1st Qtr, 2010) 01.17.2010 This report tracks the top subject areas for consumer inquiries and complaints received during the... * [81]Quality of Service Report of the Local Operating Companies (2007-2008) 12.24.2009 This report summarizes the Automated Reporting Management Information System (ARMIS) service... * [82]Telephone Subscribership Report (through July 2009) 12.15.2009 This is the Federal Communications Commissions (FCCs) report on telephone subscribership in... * [83]Quarterly
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/fcc21.html?page=4&contrast=highContrast
  • 43.61 International Traffic Data Reports [_] Statistics of Communications Common Carrier Reports [_] Telephone Penetration Reports [_] Telephone Subscribership Reports [_] Trends in Telephony Service [_] Video Competition Reports Apply Filter * [79]Telephone Subscribership Report (through November 2009) 02.02.2010 This is the Federal Communications Commissions (FCCs) report on telephone subscribership in... * [80]Quarterly Inquiries and Complaints Report (1st Qtr, 2010) 01.17.2010 This report tracks the top subject areas for consumer inquiries and complaints received during the... * [81]Quality of Service Report of the Local Operating Companies (2007-2008) 12.24.2009 This report summarizes the Automated Reporting Management Information System (ARMIS) service... * [82]Telephone Subscribership Report (through July 2009) 12.15.2009 This is the Federal Communications Commissions (FCCs) report on telephone subscribership in... * [83]Quarterly
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/fcc21.html?page=4&fontsize=
  • 43.61 International Traffic Data Reports [_] Statistics of Communications Common Carrier Reports [_] Telephone Penetration Reports [_] Telephone Subscribership Reports [_] Trends in Telephony Service [_] Video Competition Reports Apply Filter * [79]Telephone Subscribership Report (through November 2009) 02.02.2010 This is the Federal Communications Commissions (FCCs) report on telephone subscribership in... * [80]Quarterly Inquiries and Complaints Report (1st Qtr, 2010) 01.17.2010 This report tracks the top subject areas for consumer inquiries and complaints received during the... * [81]Quality of Service Report of the Local Operating Companies (2007-2008) 12.24.2009 This report summarizes the Automated Reporting Management Information System (ARMIS) service... * [82]Telephone Subscribership Report (through July 2009) 12.15.2009 This is the Federal Communications Commissions (FCCs) report on telephone subscribership in... * [83]Quarterly
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/fcc21.html?page=4&fontsize=largeFont
  • 43.61 International Traffic Data Reports [_] Statistics of Communications Common Carrier Reports [_] Telephone Penetration Reports [_] Telephone Subscribership Reports [_] Trends in Telephony Service [_] Video Competition Reports Apply Filter * [79]Telephone Subscribership Report (through November 2009) 02.02.2010 This is the Federal Communications Commissions (FCCs) report on telephone subscribership in... * [80]Quarterly Inquiries and Complaints Report (1st Qtr, 2010) 01.17.2010 This report tracks the top subject areas for consumer inquiries and complaints received during the... * [81]Quality of Service Report of the Local Operating Companies (2007-2008) 12.24.2009 This report summarizes the Automated Reporting Management Information System (ARMIS) service... * [82]Telephone Subscribership Report (through July 2009) 12.15.2009 This is the Federal Communications Commissions (FCCs) report on telephone subscribership in... * [83]Quarterly
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/fcc21.html?page=4&fontsize=mediumFont
  • 43.61 International Traffic Data Reports [_] Statistics of Communications Common Carrier Reports [_] Telephone Penetration Reports [_] Telephone Subscribership Reports [_] Trends in Telephony Service [_] Video Competition Reports Apply Filter * [79]Telephone Subscribership Report (through November 2009) 02.02.2010 This is the Federal Communications Commissions (FCCs) report on telephone subscribership in... * [80]Quarterly Inquiries and Complaints Report (1st Qtr, 2010) 01.17.2010 This report tracks the top subject areas for consumer inquiries and complaints received during the... * [81]Quality of Service Report of the Local Operating Companies (2007-2008) 12.24.2009 This report summarizes the Automated Reporting Management Information System (ARMIS) service... * [82]Telephone Subscribership Report (through July 2009) 12.15.2009 This is the Federal Communications Commissions (FCCs) report on telephone subscribership in... * [83]Quarterly
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/fcc21.html?page=9
  • its annual year-end circuit status report for U.... * [86]Trends in Telephony Service (2007) 02.01.2007 Trends in Telephone Service is published by the Industry Analysis and Technology Division of... * [87]High Speed Services for Internet Access (As of 06/30/06) 01.31.2007 We summarize here information from the fourteenth semi-annual data collection, thereby presenting a... * [88]Telephone Subscribership Report (through July 2006) 01.17.2007 This is the Federal Communications Commissions (FCCs) report on telephone subscribership in... * [89] * [90] * * [91]6 * [92]7 * [93]8 * [94]9 * 10 * [95]11 * [96]12 * [97]13 * [98]14 * * [99] * [100] Connect * [101]Facebook * [102]Twitter * [103]YouTube * [104]Flickr Share this page * Reddit * Digg * Facebook * Twitter
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/fcc21.html?page=9&contrast=
  • its annual year-end circuit status report for U.... * [86]Trends in Telephony Service (2007) 02.01.2007 Trends in Telephone Service is published by the Industry Analysis and Technology Division of... * [87]High Speed Services for Internet Access (As of 06/30/06) 01.31.2007 We summarize here information from the fourteenth semi-annual data collection, thereby presenting a... * [88]Telephone Subscribership Report (through July 2006) 01.17.2007 This is the Federal Communications Commissions (FCCs) report on telephone subscribership in... * [89] * [90] * * [91]6 * [92]7 * [93]8 * [94]9 * 10 * [95]11 * [96]12 * [97]13 * [98]14 * * [99] * [100] Connect * [101]Facebook * [102]Twitter * [103]YouTube * [104]Flickr Share this page * Reddit * Digg * Facebook * Twitter
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/fcc21.html?page=9&contrast=highContrast
  • its annual year-end circuit status report for U.... * [86]Trends in Telephony Service (2007) 02.01.2007 Trends in Telephone Service is published by the Industry Analysis and Technology Division of... * [87]High Speed Services for Internet Access (As of 06/30/06) 01.31.2007 We summarize here information from the fourteenth semi-annual data collection, thereby presenting a... * [88]Telephone Subscribership Report (through July 2006) 01.17.2007 This is the Federal Communications Commissions (FCCs) report on telephone subscribership in... * [89] * [90] * * [91]6 * [92]7 * [93]8 * [94]9 * 10 * [95]11 * [96]12 * [97]13 * [98]14 * * [99] * [100] Connect * [101]Facebook * [102]Twitter * [103]YouTube * [104]Flickr Share this page * Reddit * Digg * Facebook * Twitter
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/fcc21.html?page=9&fontsize=
  • its annual year-end circuit status report for U.... * [86]Trends in Telephony Service (2007) 02.01.2007 Trends in Telephone Service is published by the Industry Analysis and Technology Division of... * [87]High Speed Services for Internet Access (As of 06/30/06) 01.31.2007 We summarize here information from the fourteenth semi-annual data collection, thereby presenting a... * [88]Telephone Subscribership Report (through July 2006) 01.17.2007 This is the Federal Communications Commissions (FCCs) report on telephone subscribership in... * [89] * [90] * * [91]6 * [92]7 * [93]8 * [94]9 * 10 * [95]11 * [96]12 * [97]13 * [98]14 * * [99] * [100] Connect * [101]Facebook * [102]Twitter * [103]YouTube * [104]Flickr Share this page * Reddit * Digg * Facebook * Twitter
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/fcc21.html?page=9&fontsize=largeFont
  • its annual year-end circuit status report for U.... * [86]Trends in Telephony Service (2007) 02.01.2007 Trends in Telephone Service is published by the Industry Analysis and Technology Division of... * [87]High Speed Services for Internet Access (As of 06/30/06) 01.31.2007 We summarize here information from the fourteenth semi-annual data collection, thereby presenting a... * [88]Telephone Subscribership Report (through July 2006) 01.17.2007 This is the Federal Communications Commissions (FCCs) report on telephone subscribership in... * [89] * [90] * * [91]6 * [92]7 * [93]8 * [94]9 * 10 * [95]11 * [96]12 * [97]13 * [98]14 * * [99] * [100] Connect * [101]Facebook * [102]Twitter * [103]YouTube * [104]Flickr Share this page * Reddit * Digg * Facebook * Twitter
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/fcc21.html?page=9&fontsize=mediumFont
  • its annual year-end circuit status report for U.... * [86]Trends in Telephony Service (2007) 02.01.2007 Trends in Telephone Service is published by the Industry Analysis and Technology Division of... * [87]High Speed Services for Internet Access (As of 06/30/06) 01.31.2007 We summarize here information from the fourteenth semi-annual data collection, thereby presenting a... * [88]Telephone Subscribership Report (through July 2006) 01.17.2007 This is the Federal Communications Commissions (FCCs) report on telephone subscribership in... * [89] * [90] * * [91]6 * [92]7 * [93]8 * [94]9 * 10 * [95]11 * [96]12 * [97]13 * [98]14 * * [99] * [100] Connect * [101]Facebook * [102]Twitter * [103]YouTube * [104]Flickr Share this page * Reddit * Digg * Facebook * Twitter
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/fcc_reform_091301.html?page=10
  • to Congress as required by the Orbit Act [_] Satellite Competition Reports [_] Section 257 Triennial Reports [_] Section 43.61 International Traffic Data Reports [_] Statistics of Communications Common Carrier Reports [_] Telephone Penetration Reports [_] Telephone Subscribership Reports [_] Trends in Telephony Service [_] Video Competition Reports Apply Filter * [79]Numbering Resource Utilization in the U.S. (As of 12/31/05) 01.17.2007 This is the Federal Communications Commissions report on numbering resource utilization in... * [80]Local Telephone Competition (As of 06/30/06) 01.07.2007 We present here summary statistics of the latest data on local telephone service competition in... * [81]Report on Cable Industry Prices (2005) 12.27.2006 Section 623(k) of the Communications Act, as amended by the Cable Television Consumer ... * [82]Commercial Mobile
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/fcc_reform_091301.html?page=10&contrast=
  • to Congress as required by the Orbit Act [_] Satellite Competition Reports [_] Section 257 Triennial Reports [_] Section 43.61 International Traffic Data Reports [_] Statistics of Communications Common Carrier Reports [_] Telephone Penetration Reports [_] Telephone Subscribership Reports [_] Trends in Telephony Service [_] Video Competition Reports Apply Filter * [79]Numbering Resource Utilization in the U.S. (As of 12/31/05) 01.17.2007 This is the Federal Communications Commissions report on numbering resource utilization in... * [80]Local Telephone Competition (As of 06/30/06) 01.07.2007 We present here summary statistics of the latest data on local telephone service competition in... * [81]Report on Cable Industry Prices (2005) 12.27.2006 Section 623(k) of the Communications Act, as amended by the Cable Television Consumer ... * [82]Commercial Mobile
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/fcc_reform_091301.html?page=10&contrast=highContrast
  • to Congress as required by the Orbit Act [_] Satellite Competition Reports [_] Section 257 Triennial Reports [_] Section 43.61 International Traffic Data Reports [_] Statistics of Communications Common Carrier Reports [_] Telephone Penetration Reports [_] Telephone Subscribership Reports [_] Trends in Telephony Service [_] Video Competition Reports Apply Filter * [79]Numbering Resource Utilization in the U.S. (As of 12/31/05) 01.17.2007 This is the Federal Communications Commissions report on numbering resource utilization in... * [80]Local Telephone Competition (As of 06/30/06) 01.07.2007 We present here summary statistics of the latest data on local telephone service competition in... * [81]Report on Cable Industry Prices (2005) 12.27.2006 Section 623(k) of the Communications Act, as amended by the Cable Television Consumer ... * [82]Commercial Mobile
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/fcc_reform_091301.html?page=10&fontsize=
  • to Congress as required by the Orbit Act [_] Satellite Competition Reports [_] Section 257 Triennial Reports [_] Section 43.61 International Traffic Data Reports [_] Statistics of Communications Common Carrier Reports [_] Telephone Penetration Reports [_] Telephone Subscribership Reports [_] Trends in Telephony Service [_] Video Competition Reports Apply Filter * [79]Numbering Resource Utilization in the U.S. (As of 12/31/05) 01.17.2007 This is the Federal Communications Commissions report on numbering resource utilization in... * [80]Local Telephone Competition (As of 06/30/06) 01.07.2007 We present here summary statistics of the latest data on local telephone service competition in... * [81]Report on Cable Industry Prices (2005) 12.27.2006 Section 623(k) of the Communications Act, as amended by the Cable Television Consumer ... * [82]Commercial Mobile
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/fcc_reform_091301.html?page=10&fontsize=largeFont
  • to Congress as required by the Orbit Act [_] Satellite Competition Reports [_] Section 257 Triennial Reports [_] Section 43.61 International Traffic Data Reports [_] Statistics of Communications Common Carrier Reports [_] Telephone Penetration Reports [_] Telephone Subscribership Reports [_] Trends in Telephony Service [_] Video Competition Reports Apply Filter * [79]Numbering Resource Utilization in the U.S. (As of 12/31/05) 01.17.2007 This is the Federal Communications Commissions report on numbering resource utilization in... * [80]Local Telephone Competition (As of 06/30/06) 01.07.2007 We present here summary statistics of the latest data on local telephone service competition in... * [81]Report on Cable Industry Prices (2005) 12.27.2006 Section 623(k) of the Communications Act, as amended by the Cable Television Consumer ... * [82]Commercial Mobile
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/fcc_reform_091301.html?page=10&fontsize=mediumFont
  • to Congress as required by the Orbit Act [_] Satellite Competition Reports [_] Section 257 Triennial Reports [_] Section 43.61 International Traffic Data Reports [_] Statistics of Communications Common Carrier Reports [_] Telephone Penetration Reports [_] Telephone Subscribership Reports [_] Trends in Telephony Service [_] Video Competition Reports Apply Filter * [79]Numbering Resource Utilization in the U.S. (As of 12/31/05) 01.17.2007 This is the Federal Communications Commissions report on numbering resource utilization in... * [80]Local Telephone Competition (As of 06/30/06) 01.07.2007 We present here summary statistics of the latest data on local telephone service competition in... * [81]Report on Cable Industry Prices (2005) 12.27.2006 Section 623(k) of the Communications Act, as amended by the Cable Television Consumer ... * [82]Commercial Mobile
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/fcc_reform_091301.html?page=18
  • 43.61 International Traffic Data Reports [_] Statistics of Communications Common Carrier Reports [_] Telephone Penetration Reports [_] Telephone Subscribership Reports [_] Trends in Telephony Service [_] Video Competition Reports Apply Filter * [79]Telephone Subscribership Report (through July 2002) 02.12.2003 This is the Federal Communications Commissions (FCCs) report on telephone subscribership in... * [80]Quarterly Inquiries and Complaints Report (1st Qtr, 2003) 01.17.2003 This report tracks the top subject areas for consumer inquiries and complaints received during the... * [81]Quality of Service Report of the Local Operating Companies (2000-2001) 01.03.2003 This report summarizes various kinds of service quality data filed by certain incumbent local... * [82]9th Annual Video Competition Report 12.31.2002 This is the Commissions ninth annual report (2002 Report) to Congress on
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/fcc_reform_091301.html?page=18&contrast=
  • 43.61 International Traffic Data Reports [_] Statistics of Communications Common Carrier Reports [_] Telephone Penetration Reports [_] Telephone Subscribership Reports [_] Trends in Telephony Service [_] Video Competition Reports Apply Filter * [79]Telephone Subscribership Report (through July 2002) 02.12.2003 This is the Federal Communications Commissions (FCCs) report on telephone subscribership in... * [80]Quarterly Inquiries and Complaints Report (1st Qtr, 2003) 01.17.2003 This report tracks the top subject areas for consumer inquiries and complaints received during the... * [81]Quality of Service Report of the Local Operating Companies (2000-2001) 01.03.2003 This report summarizes various kinds of service quality data filed by certain incumbent local... * [82]9th Annual Video Competition Report 12.31.2002 This is the Commissions ninth annual report (2002 Report) to Congress on
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/fcc_reform_091301.html?page=18&contrast=highContrast
  • 43.61 International Traffic Data Reports [_] Statistics of Communications Common Carrier Reports [_] Telephone Penetration Reports [_] Telephone Subscribership Reports [_] Trends in Telephony Service [_] Video Competition Reports Apply Filter * [79]Telephone Subscribership Report (through July 2002) 02.12.2003 This is the Federal Communications Commissions (FCCs) report on telephone subscribership in... * [80]Quarterly Inquiries and Complaints Report (1st Qtr, 2003) 01.17.2003 This report tracks the top subject areas for consumer inquiries and complaints received during the... * [81]Quality of Service Report of the Local Operating Companies (2000-2001) 01.03.2003 This report summarizes various kinds of service quality data filed by certain incumbent local... * [82]9th Annual Video Competition Report 12.31.2002 This is the Commissions ninth annual report (2002 Report) to Congress on
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/fcc_reform_091301.html?page=18&fontsize=
  • 43.61 International Traffic Data Reports [_] Statistics of Communications Common Carrier Reports [_] Telephone Penetration Reports [_] Telephone Subscribership Reports [_] Trends in Telephony Service [_] Video Competition Reports Apply Filter * [79]Telephone Subscribership Report (through July 2002) 02.12.2003 This is the Federal Communications Commissions (FCCs) report on telephone subscribership in... * [80]Quarterly Inquiries and Complaints Report (1st Qtr, 2003) 01.17.2003 This report tracks the top subject areas for consumer inquiries and complaints received during the... * [81]Quality of Service Report of the Local Operating Companies (2000-2001) 01.03.2003 This report summarizes various kinds of service quality data filed by certain incumbent local... * [82]9th Annual Video Competition Report 12.31.2002 This is the Commissions ninth annual report (2002 Report) to Congress on
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/fcc_reform_091301.html?page=18&fontsize=largeFont
  • 43.61 International Traffic Data Reports [_] Statistics of Communications Common Carrier Reports [_] Telephone Penetration Reports [_] Telephone Subscribership Reports [_] Trends in Telephony Service [_] Video Competition Reports Apply Filter * [79]Telephone Subscribership Report (through July 2002) 02.12.2003 This is the Federal Communications Commissions (FCCs) report on telephone subscribership in... * [80]Quarterly Inquiries and Complaints Report (1st Qtr, 2003) 01.17.2003 This report tracks the top subject areas for consumer inquiries and complaints received during the... * [81]Quality of Service Report of the Local Operating Companies (2000-2001) 01.03.2003 This report summarizes various kinds of service quality data filed by certain incumbent local... * [82]9th Annual Video Competition Report 12.31.2002 This is the Commissions ninth annual report (2002 Report) to Congress on
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/fcc_reform_091301.html?page=18&fontsize=mediumFont
  • 43.61 International Traffic Data Reports [_] Statistics of Communications Common Carrier Reports [_] Telephone Penetration Reports [_] Telephone Subscribership Reports [_] Trends in Telephony Service [_] Video Competition Reports Apply Filter * [79]Telephone Subscribership Report (through July 2002) 02.12.2003 This is the Federal Communications Commissions (FCCs) report on telephone subscribership in... * [80]Quarterly Inquiries and Complaints Report (1st Qtr, 2003) 01.17.2003 This report tracks the top subject areas for consumer inquiries and complaints received during the... * [81]Quality of Service Report of the Local Operating Companies (2000-2001) 01.03.2003 This report summarizes various kinds of service quality data filed by certain incumbent local... * [82]9th Annual Video Competition Report 12.31.2002 This is the Commissions ninth annual report (2002 Report) to Congress on
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/fcc_reform_091301.html?page=20
  • (FCCs) report on telephone subscribership in the... * [81]Third Broadband Progress Report 02.07.2002 The FCC released its third report on the availability of advanced telecommunications capability... * [82]High Speed Services for Internet Access (As of 06/30/01) 02.01.2002 We summarize here information from the fourth data collection, thereby presenting a snapshot of... * [83]Quarterly Inquiries and Complaints Report (1st Qtr, 2002) 01.17.2002 This report tracks the top subject areas for consumer inquiries and complaints received during the... * [84]8th Annual Video Competition Report 01.14.2002 This is the Commissions eighth annual report (2001 Report) to Congress on the status of ... * [85]Quality of Service Report of the Local Operating Companies (1999-2000) 12.05.2001 This report summarizes various kinds of service quality data filed
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/fcc_reform_091301.html?page=20&contrast=
  • (FCCs) report on telephone subscribership in the... * [81]Third Broadband Progress Report 02.07.2002 The FCC released its third report on the availability of advanced telecommunications capability... * [82]High Speed Services for Internet Access (As of 06/30/01) 02.01.2002 We summarize here information from the fourth data collection, thereby presenting a snapshot of... * [83]Quarterly Inquiries and Complaints Report (1st Qtr, 2002) 01.17.2002 This report tracks the top subject areas for consumer inquiries and complaints received during the... * [84]8th Annual Video Competition Report 01.14.2002 This is the Commissions eighth annual report (2001 Report) to Congress on the status of ... * [85]Quality of Service Report of the Local Operating Companies (1999-2000) 12.05.2001 This report summarizes various kinds of service quality data filed
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/fcc_reform_091301.html?page=20&contrast=highContrast
  • (FCCs) report on telephone subscribership in the... * [81]Third Broadband Progress Report 02.07.2002 The FCC released its third report on the availability of advanced telecommunications capability... * [82]High Speed Services for Internet Access (As of 06/30/01) 02.01.2002 We summarize here information from the fourth data collection, thereby presenting a snapshot of... * [83]Quarterly Inquiries and Complaints Report (1st Qtr, 2002) 01.17.2002 This report tracks the top subject areas for consumer inquiries and complaints received during the... * [84]8th Annual Video Competition Report 01.14.2002 This is the Commissions eighth annual report (2001 Report) to Congress on the status of ... * [85]Quality of Service Report of the Local Operating Companies (1999-2000) 12.05.2001 This report summarizes various kinds of service quality data filed
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/fcc_reform_091301.html?page=20&fontsize=
  • (FCCs) report on telephone subscribership in the... * [81]Third Broadband Progress Report 02.07.2002 The FCC released its third report on the availability of advanced telecommunications capability... * [82]High Speed Services for Internet Access (As of 06/30/01) 02.01.2002 We summarize here information from the fourth data collection, thereby presenting a snapshot of... * [83]Quarterly Inquiries and Complaints Report (1st Qtr, 2002) 01.17.2002 This report tracks the top subject areas for consumer inquiries and complaints received during the... * [84]8th Annual Video Competition Report 01.14.2002 This is the Commissions eighth annual report (2001 Report) to Congress on the status of ... * [85]Quality of Service Report of the Local Operating Companies (1999-2000) 12.05.2001 This report summarizes various kinds of service quality data filed
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/fcc_reform_091301.html?page=20&fontsize=largeFont
  • (FCCs) report on telephone subscribership in the... * [81]Third Broadband Progress Report 02.07.2002 The FCC released its third report on the availability of advanced telecommunications capability... * [82]High Speed Services for Internet Access (As of 06/30/01) 02.01.2002 We summarize here information from the fourth data collection, thereby presenting a snapshot of... * [83]Quarterly Inquiries and Complaints Report (1st Qtr, 2002) 01.17.2002 This report tracks the top subject areas for consumer inquiries and complaints received during the... * [84]8th Annual Video Competition Report 01.14.2002 This is the Commissions eighth annual report (2001 Report) to Congress on the status of ... * [85]Quality of Service Report of the Local Operating Companies (1999-2000) 12.05.2001 This report summarizes various kinds of service quality data filed
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/fcc_reform_091301.html?page=20&fontsize=mediumFont
  • (FCCs) report on telephone subscribership in the... * [81]Third Broadband Progress Report 02.07.2002 The FCC released its third report on the availability of advanced telecommunications capability... * [82]High Speed Services for Internet Access (As of 06/30/01) 02.01.2002 We summarize here information from the fourth data collection, thereby presenting a snapshot of... * [83]Quarterly Inquiries and Complaints Report (1st Qtr, 2002) 01.17.2002 This report tracks the top subject areas for consumer inquiries and complaints received during the... * [84]8th Annual Video Competition Report 01.14.2002 This is the Commissions eighth annual report (2001 Report) to Congress on the status of ... * [85]Quality of Service Report of the Local Operating Companies (1999-2000) 12.05.2001 This report summarizes various kinds of service quality data filed
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/fcc_reform_091301.html?page=4
  • 43.61 International Traffic Data Reports [_] Statistics of Communications Common Carrier Reports [_] Telephone Penetration Reports [_] Telephone Subscribership Reports [_] Trends in Telephony Service [_] Video Competition Reports Apply Filter * [79]Telephone Subscribership Report (through November 2009) 02.02.2010 This is the Federal Communications Commissions (FCCs) report on telephone subscribership in... * [80]Quarterly Inquiries and Complaints Report (1st Qtr, 2010) 01.17.2010 This report tracks the top subject areas for consumer inquiries and complaints received during the... * [81]Quality of Service Report of the Local Operating Companies (2007-2008) 12.24.2009 This report summarizes the Automated Reporting Management Information System (ARMIS) service... * [82]Telephone Subscribership Report (through July 2009) 12.15.2009 This is the Federal Communications Commissions (FCCs) report on telephone subscribership in... * [83]Quarterly
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/fcc_reform_091301.html?page=4&contrast=
  • 43.61 International Traffic Data Reports [_] Statistics of Communications Common Carrier Reports [_] Telephone Penetration Reports [_] Telephone Subscribership Reports [_] Trends in Telephony Service [_] Video Competition Reports Apply Filter * [79]Telephone Subscribership Report (through November 2009) 02.02.2010 This is the Federal Communications Commissions (FCCs) report on telephone subscribership in... * [80]Quarterly Inquiries and Complaints Report (1st Qtr, 2010) 01.17.2010 This report tracks the top subject areas for consumer inquiries and complaints received during the... * [81]Quality of Service Report of the Local Operating Companies (2007-2008) 12.24.2009 This report summarizes the Automated Reporting Management Information System (ARMIS) service... * [82]Telephone Subscribership Report (through July 2009) 12.15.2009 This is the Federal Communications Commissions (FCCs) report on telephone subscribership in... * [83]Quarterly
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/fcc_reform_091301.html?page=4&contrast=highContrast
  • 43.61 International Traffic Data Reports [_] Statistics of Communications Common Carrier Reports [_] Telephone Penetration Reports [_] Telephone Subscribership Reports [_] Trends in Telephony Service [_] Video Competition Reports Apply Filter * [79]Telephone Subscribership Report (through November 2009) 02.02.2010 This is the Federal Communications Commissions (FCCs) report on telephone subscribership in... * [80]Quarterly Inquiries and Complaints Report (1st Qtr, 2010) 01.17.2010 This report tracks the top subject areas for consumer inquiries and complaints received during the... * [81]Quality of Service Report of the Local Operating Companies (2007-2008) 12.24.2009 This report summarizes the Automated Reporting Management Information System (ARMIS) service... * [82]Telephone Subscribership Report (through July 2009) 12.15.2009 This is the Federal Communications Commissions (FCCs) report on telephone subscribership in... * [83]Quarterly
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/fcc_reform_091301.html?page=4&fontsize=
  • 43.61 International Traffic Data Reports [_] Statistics of Communications Common Carrier Reports [_] Telephone Penetration Reports [_] Telephone Subscribership Reports [_] Trends in Telephony Service [_] Video Competition Reports Apply Filter * [79]Telephone Subscribership Report (through November 2009) 02.02.2010 This is the Federal Communications Commissions (FCCs) report on telephone subscribership in... * [80]Quarterly Inquiries and Complaints Report (1st Qtr, 2010) 01.17.2010 This report tracks the top subject areas for consumer inquiries and complaints received during the... * [81]Quality of Service Report of the Local Operating Companies (2007-2008) 12.24.2009 This report summarizes the Automated Reporting Management Information System (ARMIS) service... * [82]Telephone Subscribership Report (through July 2009) 12.15.2009 This is the Federal Communications Commissions (FCCs) report on telephone subscribership in... * [83]Quarterly
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/fcc_reform_091301.html?page=4&fontsize=largeFont
  • 43.61 International Traffic Data Reports [_] Statistics of Communications Common Carrier Reports [_] Telephone Penetration Reports [_] Telephone Subscribership Reports [_] Trends in Telephony Service [_] Video Competition Reports Apply Filter * [79]Telephone Subscribership Report (through November 2009) 02.02.2010 This is the Federal Communications Commissions (FCCs) report on telephone subscribership in... * [80]Quarterly Inquiries and Complaints Report (1st Qtr, 2010) 01.17.2010 This report tracks the top subject areas for consumer inquiries and complaints received during the... * [81]Quality of Service Report of the Local Operating Companies (2007-2008) 12.24.2009 This report summarizes the Automated Reporting Management Information System (ARMIS) service... * [82]Telephone Subscribership Report (through July 2009) 12.15.2009 This is the Federal Communications Commissions (FCCs) report on telephone subscribership in... * [83]Quarterly
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/fcc_reform_091301.html?page=4&fontsize=mediumFont
  • 43.61 International Traffic Data Reports [_] Statistics of Communications Common Carrier Reports [_] Telephone Penetration Reports [_] Telephone Subscribership Reports [_] Trends in Telephony Service [_] Video Competition Reports Apply Filter * [79]Telephone Subscribership Report (through November 2009) 02.02.2010 This is the Federal Communications Commissions (FCCs) report on telephone subscribership in... * [80]Quarterly Inquiries and Complaints Report (1st Qtr, 2010) 01.17.2010 This report tracks the top subject areas for consumer inquiries and complaints received during the... * [81]Quality of Service Report of the Local Operating Companies (2007-2008) 12.24.2009 This report summarizes the Automated Reporting Management Information System (ARMIS) service... * [82]Telephone Subscribership Report (through July 2009) 12.15.2009 This is the Federal Communications Commissions (FCCs) report on telephone subscribership in... * [83]Quarterly
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/fcc_reform_091301.html?page=9
  • its annual year-end circuit status report for U.... * [86]Trends in Telephony Service (2007) 02.01.2007 Trends in Telephone Service is published by the Industry Analysis and Technology Division of... * [87]High Speed Services for Internet Access (As of 06/30/06) 01.31.2007 We summarize here information from the fourteenth semi-annual data collection, thereby presenting a... * [88]Telephone Subscribership Report (through July 2006) 01.17.2007 This is the Federal Communications Commissions (FCCs) report on telephone subscribership in... * [89] * [90] * * [91]6 * [92]7 * [93]8 * [94]9 * 10 * [95]11 * [96]12 * [97]13 * [98]14 * * [99] * [100] Connect * [101]Facebook * [102]Twitter * [103]YouTube * [104]Flickr Share this page * Reddit * Digg * Facebook * Twitter
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/fcc_reform_091301.html?page=9&contrast=
  • its annual year-end circuit status report for U.... * [86]Trends in Telephony Service (2007) 02.01.2007 Trends in Telephone Service is published by the Industry Analysis and Technology Division of... * [87]High Speed Services for Internet Access (As of 06/30/06) 01.31.2007 We summarize here information from the fourteenth semi-annual data collection, thereby presenting a... * [88]Telephone Subscribership Report (through July 2006) 01.17.2007 This is the Federal Communications Commissions (FCCs) report on telephone subscribership in... * [89] * [90] * * [91]6 * [92]7 * [93]8 * [94]9 * 10 * [95]11 * [96]12 * [97]13 * [98]14 * * [99] * [100] Connect * [101]Facebook * [102]Twitter * [103]YouTube * [104]Flickr Share this page * Reddit * Digg * Facebook * Twitter
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/fcc_reform_091301.html?page=9&contrast=highContrast
  • its annual year-end circuit status report for U.... * [86]Trends in Telephony Service (2007) 02.01.2007 Trends in Telephone Service is published by the Industry Analysis and Technology Division of... * [87]High Speed Services for Internet Access (As of 06/30/06) 01.31.2007 We summarize here information from the fourteenth semi-annual data collection, thereby presenting a... * [88]Telephone Subscribership Report (through July 2006) 01.17.2007 This is the Federal Communications Commissions (FCCs) report on telephone subscribership in... * [89] * [90] * * [91]6 * [92]7 * [93]8 * [94]9 * 10 * [95]11 * [96]12 * [97]13 * [98]14 * * [99] * [100] Connect * [101]Facebook * [102]Twitter * [103]YouTube * [104]Flickr Share this page * Reddit * Digg * Facebook * Twitter
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/fcc_reform_091301.html?page=9&fontsize=
  • its annual year-end circuit status report for U.... * [86]Trends in Telephony Service (2007) 02.01.2007 Trends in Telephone Service is published by the Industry Analysis and Technology Division of... * [87]High Speed Services for Internet Access (As of 06/30/06) 01.31.2007 We summarize here information from the fourteenth semi-annual data collection, thereby presenting a... * [88]Telephone Subscribership Report (through July 2006) 01.17.2007 This is the Federal Communications Commissions (FCCs) report on telephone subscribership in... * [89] * [90] * * [91]6 * [92]7 * [93]8 * [94]9 * 10 * [95]11 * [96]12 * [97]13 * [98]14 * * [99] * [100] Connect * [101]Facebook * [102]Twitter * [103]YouTube * [104]Flickr Share this page * Reddit * Digg * Facebook * Twitter
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/fcc_reform_091301.html?page=9&fontsize=largeFont
  • its annual year-end circuit status report for U.... * [86]Trends in Telephony Service (2007) 02.01.2007 Trends in Telephone Service is published by the Industry Analysis and Technology Division of... * [87]High Speed Services for Internet Access (As of 06/30/06) 01.31.2007 We summarize here information from the fourteenth semi-annual data collection, thereby presenting a... * [88]Telephone Subscribership Report (through July 2006) 01.17.2007 This is the Federal Communications Commissions (FCCs) report on telephone subscribership in... * [89] * [90] * * [91]6 * [92]7 * [93]8 * [94]9 * 10 * [95]11 * [96]12 * [97]13 * [98]14 * * [99] * [100] Connect * [101]Facebook * [102]Twitter * [103]YouTube * [104]Flickr Share this page * Reddit * Digg * Facebook * Twitter
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/fcc_reform_091301.html?page=9&fontsize=mediumFont
  • its annual year-end circuit status report for U.... * [86]Trends in Telephony Service (2007) 02.01.2007 Trends in Telephone Service is published by the Industry Analysis and Technology Division of... * [87]High Speed Services for Internet Access (As of 06/30/06) 01.31.2007 We summarize here information from the fourteenth semi-annual data collection, thereby presenting a... * [88]Telephone Subscribership Report (through July 2006) 01.17.2007 This is the Federal Communications Commissions (FCCs) report on telephone subscribership in... * [89] * [90] * * [91]6 * [92]7 * [93]8 * [94]9 * 10 * [95]11 * [96]12 * [97]13 * [98]14 * * [99] * [100] Connect * [101]Facebook * [102]Twitter * [103]YouTube * [104]Flickr Share this page * Reddit * Digg * Facebook * Twitter
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/fccbudget.html?page=10
  • to Congress as required by the Orbit Act [_] Satellite Competition Reports [_] Section 257 Triennial Reports [_] Section 43.61 International Traffic Data Reports [_] Statistics of Communications Common Carrier Reports [_] Telephone Penetration Reports [_] Telephone Subscribership Reports [_] Trends in Telephony Service [_] Video Competition Reports Apply Filter * [79]Numbering Resource Utilization in the U.S. (As of 12/31/05) 01.17.2007 This is the Federal Communications Commissions report on numbering resource utilization in... * [80]Local Telephone Competition (As of 06/30/06) 01.07.2007 We present here summary statistics of the latest data on local telephone service competition in... * [81]Report on Cable Industry Prices (2005) 12.27.2006 Section 623(k) of the Communications Act, as amended by the Cable Television Consumer ... * [82]Commercial Mobile
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/fccbudget.html?page=10&contrast=
  • to Congress as required by the Orbit Act [_] Satellite Competition Reports [_] Section 257 Triennial Reports [_] Section 43.61 International Traffic Data Reports [_] Statistics of Communications Common Carrier Reports [_] Telephone Penetration Reports [_] Telephone Subscribership Reports [_] Trends in Telephony Service [_] Video Competition Reports Apply Filter * [79]Numbering Resource Utilization in the U.S. (As of 12/31/05) 01.17.2007 This is the Federal Communications Commissions report on numbering resource utilization in... * [80]Local Telephone Competition (As of 06/30/06) 01.07.2007 We present here summary statistics of the latest data on local telephone service competition in... * [81]Report on Cable Industry Prices (2005) 12.27.2006 Section 623(k) of the Communications Act, as amended by the Cable Television Consumer ... * [82]Commercial Mobile
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/fccbudget.html?page=10&contrast=highContrast
  • to Congress as required by the Orbit Act [_] Satellite Competition Reports [_] Section 257 Triennial Reports [_] Section 43.61 International Traffic Data Reports [_] Statistics of Communications Common Carrier Reports [_] Telephone Penetration Reports [_] Telephone Subscribership Reports [_] Trends in Telephony Service [_] Video Competition Reports Apply Filter * [79]Numbering Resource Utilization in the U.S. (As of 12/31/05) 01.17.2007 This is the Federal Communications Commissions report on numbering resource utilization in... * [80]Local Telephone Competition (As of 06/30/06) 01.07.2007 We present here summary statistics of the latest data on local telephone service competition in... * [81]Report on Cable Industry Prices (2005) 12.27.2006 Section 623(k) of the Communications Act, as amended by the Cable Television Consumer ... * [82]Commercial Mobile
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/fccbudget.html?page=10&fontsize=
  • to Congress as required by the Orbit Act [_] Satellite Competition Reports [_] Section 257 Triennial Reports [_] Section 43.61 International Traffic Data Reports [_] Statistics of Communications Common Carrier Reports [_] Telephone Penetration Reports [_] Telephone Subscribership Reports [_] Trends in Telephony Service [_] Video Competition Reports Apply Filter * [79]Numbering Resource Utilization in the U.S. (As of 12/31/05) 01.17.2007 This is the Federal Communications Commissions report on numbering resource utilization in... * [80]Local Telephone Competition (As of 06/30/06) 01.07.2007 We present here summary statistics of the latest data on local telephone service competition in... * [81]Report on Cable Industry Prices (2005) 12.27.2006 Section 623(k) of the Communications Act, as amended by the Cable Television Consumer ... * [82]Commercial Mobile
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/fccbudget.html?page=10&fontsize=largeFont
  • to Congress as required by the Orbit Act [_] Satellite Competition Reports [_] Section 257 Triennial Reports [_] Section 43.61 International Traffic Data Reports [_] Statistics of Communications Common Carrier Reports [_] Telephone Penetration Reports [_] Telephone Subscribership Reports [_] Trends in Telephony Service [_] Video Competition Reports Apply Filter * [79]Numbering Resource Utilization in the U.S. (As of 12/31/05) 01.17.2007 This is the Federal Communications Commissions report on numbering resource utilization in... * [80]Local Telephone Competition (As of 06/30/06) 01.07.2007 We present here summary statistics of the latest data on local telephone service competition in... * [81]Report on Cable Industry Prices (2005) 12.27.2006 Section 623(k) of the Communications Act, as amended by the Cable Television Consumer ... * [82]Commercial Mobile
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/fccbudget.html?page=10&fontsize=mediumFont
  • to Congress as required by the Orbit Act [_] Satellite Competition Reports [_] Section 257 Triennial Reports [_] Section 43.61 International Traffic Data Reports [_] Statistics of Communications Common Carrier Reports [_] Telephone Penetration Reports [_] Telephone Subscribership Reports [_] Trends in Telephony Service [_] Video Competition Reports Apply Filter * [79]Numbering Resource Utilization in the U.S. (As of 12/31/05) 01.17.2007 This is the Federal Communications Commissions report on numbering resource utilization in... * [80]Local Telephone Competition (As of 06/30/06) 01.07.2007 We present here summary statistics of the latest data on local telephone service competition in... * [81]Report on Cable Industry Prices (2005) 12.27.2006 Section 623(k) of the Communications Act, as amended by the Cable Television Consumer ... * [82]Commercial Mobile
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/fccbudget.html?page=18
  • 43.61 International Traffic Data Reports [_] Statistics of Communications Common Carrier Reports [_] Telephone Penetration Reports [_] Telephone Subscribership Reports [_] Trends in Telephony Service [_] Video Competition Reports Apply Filter * [79]Telephone Subscribership Report (through July 2002) 02.12.2003 This is the Federal Communications Commissions (FCCs) report on telephone subscribership in... * [80]Quarterly Inquiries and Complaints Report (1st Qtr, 2003) 01.17.2003 This report tracks the top subject areas for consumer inquiries and complaints received during the... * [81]Quality of Service Report of the Local Operating Companies (2000-2001) 01.03.2003 This report summarizes various kinds of service quality data filed by certain incumbent local... * [82]9th Annual Video Competition Report 12.31.2002 This is the Commissions ninth annual report (2002 Report) to Congress on
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/fccbudget.html?page=18&contrast=
  • 43.61 International Traffic Data Reports [_] Statistics of Communications Common Carrier Reports [_] Telephone Penetration Reports [_] Telephone Subscribership Reports [_] Trends in Telephony Service [_] Video Competition Reports Apply Filter * [79]Telephone Subscribership Report (through July 2002) 02.12.2003 This is the Federal Communications Commissions (FCCs) report on telephone subscribership in... * [80]Quarterly Inquiries and Complaints Report (1st Qtr, 2003) 01.17.2003 This report tracks the top subject areas for consumer inquiries and complaints received during the... * [81]Quality of Service Report of the Local Operating Companies (2000-2001) 01.03.2003 This report summarizes various kinds of service quality data filed by certain incumbent local... * [82]9th Annual Video Competition Report 12.31.2002 This is the Commissions ninth annual report (2002 Report) to Congress on
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/fccbudget.html?page=18&contrast=highContrast
  • 43.61 International Traffic Data Reports [_] Statistics of Communications Common Carrier Reports [_] Telephone Penetration Reports [_] Telephone Subscribership Reports [_] Trends in Telephony Service [_] Video Competition Reports Apply Filter * [79]Telephone Subscribership Report (through July 2002) 02.12.2003 This is the Federal Communications Commissions (FCCs) report on telephone subscribership in... * [80]Quarterly Inquiries and Complaints Report (1st Qtr, 2003) 01.17.2003 This report tracks the top subject areas for consumer inquiries and complaints received during the... * [81]Quality of Service Report of the Local Operating Companies (2000-2001) 01.03.2003 This report summarizes various kinds of service quality data filed by certain incumbent local... * [82]9th Annual Video Competition Report 12.31.2002 This is the Commissions ninth annual report (2002 Report) to Congress on
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/fccbudget.html?page=18&fontsize=
  • 43.61 International Traffic Data Reports [_] Statistics of Communications Common Carrier Reports [_] Telephone Penetration Reports [_] Telephone Subscribership Reports [_] Trends in Telephony Service [_] Video Competition Reports Apply Filter * [79]Telephone Subscribership Report (through July 2002) 02.12.2003 This is the Federal Communications Commissions (FCCs) report on telephone subscribership in... * [80]Quarterly Inquiries and Complaints Report (1st Qtr, 2003) 01.17.2003 This report tracks the top subject areas for consumer inquiries and complaints received during the... * [81]Quality of Service Report of the Local Operating Companies (2000-2001) 01.03.2003 This report summarizes various kinds of service quality data filed by certain incumbent local... * [82]9th Annual Video Competition Report 12.31.2002 This is the Commissions ninth annual report (2002 Report) to Congress on
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/fccbudget.html?page=18&fontsize=largeFont
  • 43.61 International Traffic Data Reports [_] Statistics of Communications Common Carrier Reports [_] Telephone Penetration Reports [_] Telephone Subscribership Reports [_] Trends in Telephony Service [_] Video Competition Reports Apply Filter * [79]Telephone Subscribership Report (through July 2002) 02.12.2003 This is the Federal Communications Commissions (FCCs) report on telephone subscribership in... * [80]Quarterly Inquiries and Complaints Report (1st Qtr, 2003) 01.17.2003 This report tracks the top subject areas for consumer inquiries and complaints received during the... * [81]Quality of Service Report of the Local Operating Companies (2000-2001) 01.03.2003 This report summarizes various kinds of service quality data filed by certain incumbent local... * [82]9th Annual Video Competition Report 12.31.2002 This is the Commissions ninth annual report (2002 Report) to Congress on
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/fccbudget.html?page=18&fontsize=mediumFont
  • 43.61 International Traffic Data Reports [_] Statistics of Communications Common Carrier Reports [_] Telephone Penetration Reports [_] Telephone Subscribership Reports [_] Trends in Telephony Service [_] Video Competition Reports Apply Filter * [79]Telephone Subscribership Report (through July 2002) 02.12.2003 This is the Federal Communications Commissions (FCCs) report on telephone subscribership in... * [80]Quarterly Inquiries and Complaints Report (1st Qtr, 2003) 01.17.2003 This report tracks the top subject areas for consumer inquiries and complaints received during the... * [81]Quality of Service Report of the Local Operating Companies (2000-2001) 01.03.2003 This report summarizes various kinds of service quality data filed by certain incumbent local... * [82]9th Annual Video Competition Report 12.31.2002 This is the Commissions ninth annual report (2002 Report) to Congress on
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/fccbudget.html?page=20
  • (FCCs) report on telephone subscribership in the... * [81]Third Broadband Progress Report 02.07.2002 The FCC released its third report on the availability of advanced telecommunications capability... * [82]High Speed Services for Internet Access (As of 06/30/01) 02.01.2002 We summarize here information from the fourth data collection, thereby presenting a snapshot of... * [83]Quarterly Inquiries and Complaints Report (1st Qtr, 2002) 01.17.2002 This report tracks the top subject areas for consumer inquiries and complaints received during the... * [84]8th Annual Video Competition Report 01.14.2002 This is the Commissions eighth annual report (2001 Report) to Congress on the status of ... * [85]Quality of Service Report of the Local Operating Companies (1999-2000) 12.05.2001 This report summarizes various kinds of service quality data filed
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/fccbudget.html?page=20&contrast=
  • (FCCs) report on telephone subscribership in the... * [81]Third Broadband Progress Report 02.07.2002 The FCC released its third report on the availability of advanced telecommunications capability... * [82]High Speed Services for Internet Access (As of 06/30/01) 02.01.2002 We summarize here information from the fourth data collection, thereby presenting a snapshot of... * [83]Quarterly Inquiries and Complaints Report (1st Qtr, 2002) 01.17.2002 This report tracks the top subject areas for consumer inquiries and complaints received during the... * [84]8th Annual Video Competition Report 01.14.2002 This is the Commissions eighth annual report (2001 Report) to Congress on the status of ... * [85]Quality of Service Report of the Local Operating Companies (1999-2000) 12.05.2001 This report summarizes various kinds of service quality data filed
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/fccbudget.html?page=20&contrast=highContrast
  • (FCCs) report on telephone subscribership in the... * [81]Third Broadband Progress Report 02.07.2002 The FCC released its third report on the availability of advanced telecommunications capability... * [82]High Speed Services for Internet Access (As of 06/30/01) 02.01.2002 We summarize here information from the fourth data collection, thereby presenting a snapshot of... * [83]Quarterly Inquiries and Complaints Report (1st Qtr, 2002) 01.17.2002 This report tracks the top subject areas for consumer inquiries and complaints received during the... * [84]8th Annual Video Competition Report 01.14.2002 This is the Commissions eighth annual report (2001 Report) to Congress on the status of ... * [85]Quality of Service Report of the Local Operating Companies (1999-2000) 12.05.2001 This report summarizes various kinds of service quality data filed
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/fccbudget.html?page=20&fontsize=
  • (FCCs) report on telephone subscribership in the... * [81]Third Broadband Progress Report 02.07.2002 The FCC released its third report on the availability of advanced telecommunications capability... * [82]High Speed Services for Internet Access (As of 06/30/01) 02.01.2002 We summarize here information from the fourth data collection, thereby presenting a snapshot of... * [83]Quarterly Inquiries and Complaints Report (1st Qtr, 2002) 01.17.2002 This report tracks the top subject areas for consumer inquiries and complaints received during the... * [84]8th Annual Video Competition Report 01.14.2002 This is the Commissions eighth annual report (2001 Report) to Congress on the status of ... * [85]Quality of Service Report of the Local Operating Companies (1999-2000) 12.05.2001 This report summarizes various kinds of service quality data filed
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/fccbudget.html?page=20&fontsize=largeFont
  • (FCCs) report on telephone subscribership in the... * [81]Third Broadband Progress Report 02.07.2002 The FCC released its third report on the availability of advanced telecommunications capability... * [82]High Speed Services for Internet Access (As of 06/30/01) 02.01.2002 We summarize here information from the fourth data collection, thereby presenting a snapshot of... * [83]Quarterly Inquiries and Complaints Report (1st Qtr, 2002) 01.17.2002 This report tracks the top subject areas for consumer inquiries and complaints received during the... * [84]8th Annual Video Competition Report 01.14.2002 This is the Commissions eighth annual report (2001 Report) to Congress on the status of ... * [85]Quality of Service Report of the Local Operating Companies (1999-2000) 12.05.2001 This report summarizes various kinds of service quality data filed
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/fccbudget.html?page=20&fontsize=mediumFont
  • (FCCs) report on telephone subscribership in the... * [81]Third Broadband Progress Report 02.07.2002 The FCC released its third report on the availability of advanced telecommunications capability... * [82]High Speed Services for Internet Access (As of 06/30/01) 02.01.2002 We summarize here information from the fourth data collection, thereby presenting a snapshot of... * [83]Quarterly Inquiries and Complaints Report (1st Qtr, 2002) 01.17.2002 This report tracks the top subject areas for consumer inquiries and complaints received during the... * [84]8th Annual Video Competition Report 01.14.2002 This is the Commissions eighth annual report (2001 Report) to Congress on the status of ... * [85]Quality of Service Report of the Local Operating Companies (1999-2000) 12.05.2001 This report summarizes various kinds of service quality data filed
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/fccbudget.html?page=4
  • 43.61 International Traffic Data Reports [_] Statistics of Communications Common Carrier Reports [_] Telephone Penetration Reports [_] Telephone Subscribership Reports [_] Trends in Telephony Service [_] Video Competition Reports Apply Filter * [79]Telephone Subscribership Report (through November 2009) 02.02.2010 This is the Federal Communications Commissions (FCCs) report on telephone subscribership in... * [80]Quarterly Inquiries and Complaints Report (1st Qtr, 2010) 01.17.2010 This report tracks the top subject areas for consumer inquiries and complaints received during the... * [81]Quality of Service Report of the Local Operating Companies (2007-2008) 12.24.2009 This report summarizes the Automated Reporting Management Information System (ARMIS) service... * [82]Telephone Subscribership Report (through July 2009) 12.15.2009 This is the Federal Communications Commissions (FCCs) report on telephone subscribership in... * [83]Quarterly
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/fccbudget.html?page=4&contrast=
  • 43.61 International Traffic Data Reports [_] Statistics of Communications Common Carrier Reports [_] Telephone Penetration Reports [_] Telephone Subscribership Reports [_] Trends in Telephony Service [_] Video Competition Reports Apply Filter * [79]Telephone Subscribership Report (through November 2009) 02.02.2010 This is the Federal Communications Commissions (FCCs) report on telephone subscribership in... * [80]Quarterly Inquiries and Complaints Report (1st Qtr, 2010) 01.17.2010 This report tracks the top subject areas for consumer inquiries and complaints received during the... * [81]Quality of Service Report of the Local Operating Companies (2007-2008) 12.24.2009 This report summarizes the Automated Reporting Management Information System (ARMIS) service... * [82]Telephone Subscribership Report (through July 2009) 12.15.2009 This is the Federal Communications Commissions (FCCs) report on telephone subscribership in... * [83]Quarterly
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/fccbudget.html?page=4&contrast=highContrast
  • 43.61 International Traffic Data Reports [_] Statistics of Communications Common Carrier Reports [_] Telephone Penetration Reports [_] Telephone Subscribership Reports [_] Trends in Telephony Service [_] Video Competition Reports Apply Filter * [79]Telephone Subscribership Report (through November 2009) 02.02.2010 This is the Federal Communications Commissions (FCCs) report on telephone subscribership in... * [80]Quarterly Inquiries and Complaints Report (1st Qtr, 2010) 01.17.2010 This report tracks the top subject areas for consumer inquiries and complaints received during the... * [81]Quality of Service Report of the Local Operating Companies (2007-2008) 12.24.2009 This report summarizes the Automated Reporting Management Information System (ARMIS) service... * [82]Telephone Subscribership Report (through July 2009) 12.15.2009 This is the Federal Communications Commissions (FCCs) report on telephone subscribership in... * [83]Quarterly
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/fccbudget.html?page=4&fontsize=
  • 43.61 International Traffic Data Reports [_] Statistics of Communications Common Carrier Reports [_] Telephone Penetration Reports [_] Telephone Subscribership Reports [_] Trends in Telephony Service [_] Video Competition Reports Apply Filter * [79]Telephone Subscribership Report (through November 2009) 02.02.2010 This is the Federal Communications Commissions (FCCs) report on telephone subscribership in... * [80]Quarterly Inquiries and Complaints Report (1st Qtr, 2010) 01.17.2010 This report tracks the top subject areas for consumer inquiries and complaints received during the... * [81]Quality of Service Report of the Local Operating Companies (2007-2008) 12.24.2009 This report summarizes the Automated Reporting Management Information System (ARMIS) service... * [82]Telephone Subscribership Report (through July 2009) 12.15.2009 This is the Federal Communications Commissions (FCCs) report on telephone subscribership in... * [83]Quarterly
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/fccbudget.html?page=4&fontsize=largeFont
  • 43.61 International Traffic Data Reports [_] Statistics of Communications Common Carrier Reports [_] Telephone Penetration Reports [_] Telephone Subscribership Reports [_] Trends in Telephony Service [_] Video Competition Reports Apply Filter * [79]Telephone Subscribership Report (through November 2009) 02.02.2010 This is the Federal Communications Commissions (FCCs) report on telephone subscribership in... * [80]Quarterly Inquiries and Complaints Report (1st Qtr, 2010) 01.17.2010 This report tracks the top subject areas for consumer inquiries and complaints received during the... * [81]Quality of Service Report of the Local Operating Companies (2007-2008) 12.24.2009 This report summarizes the Automated Reporting Management Information System (ARMIS) service... * [82]Telephone Subscribership Report (through July 2009) 12.15.2009 This is the Federal Communications Commissions (FCCs) report on telephone subscribership in... * [83]Quarterly
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/fccbudget.html?page=4&fontsize=mediumFont
  • 43.61 International Traffic Data Reports [_] Statistics of Communications Common Carrier Reports [_] Telephone Penetration Reports [_] Telephone Subscribership Reports [_] Trends in Telephony Service [_] Video Competition Reports Apply Filter * [79]Telephone Subscribership Report (through November 2009) 02.02.2010 This is the Federal Communications Commissions (FCCs) report on telephone subscribership in... * [80]Quarterly Inquiries and Complaints Report (1st Qtr, 2010) 01.17.2010 This report tracks the top subject areas for consumer inquiries and complaints received during the... * [81]Quality of Service Report of the Local Operating Companies (2007-2008) 12.24.2009 This report summarizes the Automated Reporting Management Information System (ARMIS) service... * [82]Telephone Subscribership Report (through July 2009) 12.15.2009 This is the Federal Communications Commissions (FCCs) report on telephone subscribership in... * [83]Quarterly
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/fccbudget.html?page=9
  • its annual year-end circuit status report for U.... * [86]Trends in Telephony Service (2007) 02.01.2007 Trends in Telephone Service is published by the Industry Analysis and Technology Division of... * [87]High Speed Services for Internet Access (As of 06/30/06) 01.31.2007 We summarize here information from the fourteenth semi-annual data collection, thereby presenting a... * [88]Telephone Subscribership Report (through July 2006) 01.17.2007 This is the Federal Communications Commissions (FCCs) report on telephone subscribership in... * [89] * [90] * * [91]6 * [92]7 * [93]8 * [94]9 * 10 * [95]11 * [96]12 * [97]13 * [98]14 * * [99] * [100] Connect * [101]Facebook * [102]Twitter * [103]YouTube * [104]Flickr Share this page * Reddit * Digg * Facebook * Twitter
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/fccbudget.html?page=9&contrast=
  • its annual year-end circuit status report for U.... * [86]Trends in Telephony Service (2007) 02.01.2007 Trends in Telephone Service is published by the Industry Analysis and Technology Division of... * [87]High Speed Services for Internet Access (As of 06/30/06) 01.31.2007 We summarize here information from the fourteenth semi-annual data collection, thereby presenting a... * [88]Telephone Subscribership Report (through July 2006) 01.17.2007 This is the Federal Communications Commissions (FCCs) report on telephone subscribership in... * [89] * [90] * * [91]6 * [92]7 * [93]8 * [94]9 * 10 * [95]11 * [96]12 * [97]13 * [98]14 * * [99] * [100] Connect * [101]Facebook * [102]Twitter * [103]YouTube * [104]Flickr Share this page * Reddit * Digg * Facebook * Twitter
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/fccbudget.html?page=9&contrast=highContrast
  • its annual year-end circuit status report for U.... * [86]Trends in Telephony Service (2007) 02.01.2007 Trends in Telephone Service is published by the Industry Analysis and Technology Division of... * [87]High Speed Services for Internet Access (As of 06/30/06) 01.31.2007 We summarize here information from the fourteenth semi-annual data collection, thereby presenting a... * [88]Telephone Subscribership Report (through July 2006) 01.17.2007 This is the Federal Communications Commissions (FCCs) report on telephone subscribership in... * [89] * [90] * * [91]6 * [92]7 * [93]8 * [94]9 * 10 * [95]11 * [96]12 * [97]13 * [98]14 * * [99] * [100] Connect * [101]Facebook * [102]Twitter * [103]YouTube * [104]Flickr Share this page * Reddit * Digg * Facebook * Twitter
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/fccbudget.html?page=9&fontsize=
  • its annual year-end circuit status report for U.... * [86]Trends in Telephony Service (2007) 02.01.2007 Trends in Telephone Service is published by the Industry Analysis and Technology Division of... * [87]High Speed Services for Internet Access (As of 06/30/06) 01.31.2007 We summarize here information from the fourteenth semi-annual data collection, thereby presenting a... * [88]Telephone Subscribership Report (through July 2006) 01.17.2007 This is the Federal Communications Commissions (FCCs) report on telephone subscribership in... * [89] * [90] * * [91]6 * [92]7 * [93]8 * [94]9 * 10 * [95]11 * [96]12 * [97]13 * [98]14 * * [99] * [100] Connect * [101]Facebook * [102]Twitter * [103]YouTube * [104]Flickr Share this page * Reddit * Digg * Facebook * Twitter
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/fccbudget.html?page=9&fontsize=largeFont
  • its annual year-end circuit status report for U.... * [86]Trends in Telephony Service (2007) 02.01.2007 Trends in Telephone Service is published by the Industry Analysis and Technology Division of... * [87]High Speed Services for Internet Access (As of 06/30/06) 01.31.2007 We summarize here information from the fourteenth semi-annual data collection, thereby presenting a... * [88]Telephone Subscribership Report (through July 2006) 01.17.2007 This is the Federal Communications Commissions (FCCs) report on telephone subscribership in... * [89] * [90] * * [91]6 * [92]7 * [93]8 * [94]9 * 10 * [95]11 * [96]12 * [97]13 * [98]14 * * [99] * [100] Connect * [101]Facebook * [102]Twitter * [103]YouTube * [104]Flickr Share this page * Reddit * Digg * Facebook * Twitter
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/fccbudget.html?page=9&fontsize=mediumFont
  • its annual year-end circuit status report for U.... * [86]Trends in Telephony Service (2007) 02.01.2007 Trends in Telephone Service is published by the Industry Analysis and Technology Division of... * [87]High Speed Services for Internet Access (As of 06/30/06) 01.31.2007 We summarize here information from the fourteenth semi-annual data collection, thereby presenting a... * [88]Telephone Subscribership Report (through July 2006) 01.17.2007 This is the Federal Communications Commissions (FCCs) report on telephone subscribership in... * [89] * [90] * * [91]6 * [92]7 * [93]8 * [94]9 * 10 * [95]11 * [96]12 * [97]13 * [98]14 * * [99] * [100] Connect * [101]Facebook * [102]Twitter * [103]YouTube * [104]Flickr Share this page * Reddit * Digg * Facebook * Twitter
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/imp_rpt.html?page=10
  • to Congress as required by the Orbit Act [_] Satellite Competition Reports [_] Section 257 Triennial Reports [_] Section 43.61 International Traffic Data Reports [_] Statistics of Communications Common Carrier Reports [_] Telephone Penetration Reports [_] Telephone Subscribership Reports [_] Trends in Telephony Service [_] Video Competition Reports Apply Filter * [79]Numbering Resource Utilization in the U.S. (As of 12/31/05) 01.17.2007 This is the Federal Communications Commissions report on numbering resource utilization in... * [80]Local Telephone Competition (As of 06/30/06) 01.07.2007 We present here summary statistics of the latest data on local telephone service competition in... * [81]Report on Cable Industry Prices (2005) 12.27.2006 Section 623(k) of the Communications Act, as amended by the Cable Television Consumer ... * [82]Commercial Mobile
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/imp_rpt.html?page=10&contrast=
  • to Congress as required by the Orbit Act [_] Satellite Competition Reports [_] Section 257 Triennial Reports [_] Section 43.61 International Traffic Data Reports [_] Statistics of Communications Common Carrier Reports [_] Telephone Penetration Reports [_] Telephone Subscribership Reports [_] Trends in Telephony Service [_] Video Competition Reports Apply Filter * [79]Numbering Resource Utilization in the U.S. (As of 12/31/05) 01.17.2007 This is the Federal Communications Commissions report on numbering resource utilization in... * [80]Local Telephone Competition (As of 06/30/06) 01.07.2007 We present here summary statistics of the latest data on local telephone service competition in... * [81]Report on Cable Industry Prices (2005) 12.27.2006 Section 623(k) of the Communications Act, as amended by the Cable Television Consumer ... * [82]Commercial Mobile
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/imp_rpt.html?page=10&contrast=highContrast
  • to Congress as required by the Orbit Act [_] Satellite Competition Reports [_] Section 257 Triennial Reports [_] Section 43.61 International Traffic Data Reports [_] Statistics of Communications Common Carrier Reports [_] Telephone Penetration Reports [_] Telephone Subscribership Reports [_] Trends in Telephony Service [_] Video Competition Reports Apply Filter * [79]Numbering Resource Utilization in the U.S. (As of 12/31/05) 01.17.2007 This is the Federal Communications Commissions report on numbering resource utilization in... * [80]Local Telephone Competition (As of 06/30/06) 01.07.2007 We present here summary statistics of the latest data on local telephone service competition in... * [81]Report on Cable Industry Prices (2005) 12.27.2006 Section 623(k) of the Communications Act, as amended by the Cable Television Consumer ... * [82]Commercial Mobile
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/imp_rpt.html?page=10&fontsize=
  • to Congress as required by the Orbit Act [_] Satellite Competition Reports [_] Section 257 Triennial Reports [_] Section 43.61 International Traffic Data Reports [_] Statistics of Communications Common Carrier Reports [_] Telephone Penetration Reports [_] Telephone Subscribership Reports [_] Trends in Telephony Service [_] Video Competition Reports Apply Filter * [79]Numbering Resource Utilization in the U.S. (As of 12/31/05) 01.17.2007 This is the Federal Communications Commissions report on numbering resource utilization in... * [80]Local Telephone Competition (As of 06/30/06) 01.07.2007 We present here summary statistics of the latest data on local telephone service competition in... * [81]Report on Cable Industry Prices (2005) 12.27.2006 Section 623(k) of the Communications Act, as amended by the Cable Television Consumer ... * [82]Commercial Mobile
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/imp_rpt.html?page=10&fontsize=largeFont
  • to Congress as required by the Orbit Act [_] Satellite Competition Reports [_] Section 257 Triennial Reports [_] Section 43.61 International Traffic Data Reports [_] Statistics of Communications Common Carrier Reports [_] Telephone Penetration Reports [_] Telephone Subscribership Reports [_] Trends in Telephony Service [_] Video Competition Reports Apply Filter * [79]Numbering Resource Utilization in the U.S. (As of 12/31/05) 01.17.2007 This is the Federal Communications Commissions report on numbering resource utilization in... * [80]Local Telephone Competition (As of 06/30/06) 01.07.2007 We present here summary statistics of the latest data on local telephone service competition in... * [81]Report on Cable Industry Prices (2005) 12.27.2006 Section 623(k) of the Communications Act, as amended by the Cable Television Consumer ... * [82]Commercial Mobile
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/imp_rpt.html?page=10&fontsize=mediumFont
  • to Congress as required by the Orbit Act [_] Satellite Competition Reports [_] Section 257 Triennial Reports [_] Section 43.61 International Traffic Data Reports [_] Statistics of Communications Common Carrier Reports [_] Telephone Penetration Reports [_] Telephone Subscribership Reports [_] Trends in Telephony Service [_] Video Competition Reports Apply Filter * [79]Numbering Resource Utilization in the U.S. (As of 12/31/05) 01.17.2007 This is the Federal Communications Commissions report on numbering resource utilization in... * [80]Local Telephone Competition (As of 06/30/06) 01.07.2007 We present here summary statistics of the latest data on local telephone service competition in... * [81]Report on Cable Industry Prices (2005) 12.27.2006 Section 623(k) of the Communications Act, as amended by the Cable Television Consumer ... * [82]Commercial Mobile
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/imp_rpt.html?page=18
  • 43.61 International Traffic Data Reports [_] Statistics of Communications Common Carrier Reports [_] Telephone Penetration Reports [_] Telephone Subscribership Reports [_] Trends in Telephony Service [_] Video Competition Reports Apply Filter * [79]Telephone Subscribership Report (through July 2002) 02.12.2003 This is the Federal Communications Commissions (FCCs) report on telephone subscribership in... * [80]Quarterly Inquiries and Complaints Report (1st Qtr, 2003) 01.17.2003 This report tracks the top subject areas for consumer inquiries and complaints received during the... * [81]Quality of Service Report of the Local Operating Companies (2000-2001) 01.03.2003 This report summarizes various kinds of service quality data filed by certain incumbent local... * [82]9th Annual Video Competition Report 12.31.2002 This is the Commissions ninth annual report (2002 Report) to Congress on
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/imp_rpt.html?page=18&contrast=
  • 43.61 International Traffic Data Reports [_] Statistics of Communications Common Carrier Reports [_] Telephone Penetration Reports [_] Telephone Subscribership Reports [_] Trends in Telephony Service [_] Video Competition Reports Apply Filter * [79]Telephone Subscribership Report (through July 2002) 02.12.2003 This is the Federal Communications Commissions (FCCs) report on telephone subscribership in... * [80]Quarterly Inquiries and Complaints Report (1st Qtr, 2003) 01.17.2003 This report tracks the top subject areas for consumer inquiries and complaints received during the... * [81]Quality of Service Report of the Local Operating Companies (2000-2001) 01.03.2003 This report summarizes various kinds of service quality data filed by certain incumbent local... * [82]9th Annual Video Competition Report 12.31.2002 This is the Commissions ninth annual report (2002 Report) to Congress on
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/imp_rpt.html?page=18&contrast=highContrast
  • 43.61 International Traffic Data Reports [_] Statistics of Communications Common Carrier Reports [_] Telephone Penetration Reports [_] Telephone Subscribership Reports [_] Trends in Telephony Service [_] Video Competition Reports Apply Filter * [79]Telephone Subscribership Report (through July 2002) 02.12.2003 This is the Federal Communications Commissions (FCCs) report on telephone subscribership in... * [80]Quarterly Inquiries and Complaints Report (1st Qtr, 2003) 01.17.2003 This report tracks the top subject areas for consumer inquiries and complaints received during the... * [81]Quality of Service Report of the Local Operating Companies (2000-2001) 01.03.2003 This report summarizes various kinds of service quality data filed by certain incumbent local... * [82]9th Annual Video Competition Report 12.31.2002 This is the Commissions ninth annual report (2002 Report) to Congress on
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/imp_rpt.html?page=18&fontsize=
  • 43.61 International Traffic Data Reports [_] Statistics of Communications Common Carrier Reports [_] Telephone Penetration Reports [_] Telephone Subscribership Reports [_] Trends in Telephony Service [_] Video Competition Reports Apply Filter * [79]Telephone Subscribership Report (through July 2002) 02.12.2003 This is the Federal Communications Commissions (FCCs) report on telephone subscribership in... * [80]Quarterly Inquiries and Complaints Report (1st Qtr, 2003) 01.17.2003 This report tracks the top subject areas for consumer inquiries and complaints received during the... * [81]Quality of Service Report of the Local Operating Companies (2000-2001) 01.03.2003 This report summarizes various kinds of service quality data filed by certain incumbent local... * [82]9th Annual Video Competition Report 12.31.2002 This is the Commissions ninth annual report (2002 Report) to Congress on
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/imp_rpt.html?page=18&fontsize=largeFont
  • 43.61 International Traffic Data Reports [_] Statistics of Communications Common Carrier Reports [_] Telephone Penetration Reports [_] Telephone Subscribership Reports [_] Trends in Telephony Service [_] Video Competition Reports Apply Filter * [79]Telephone Subscribership Report (through July 2002) 02.12.2003 This is the Federal Communications Commissions (FCCs) report on telephone subscribership in... * [80]Quarterly Inquiries and Complaints Report (1st Qtr, 2003) 01.17.2003 This report tracks the top subject areas for consumer inquiries and complaints received during the... * [81]Quality of Service Report of the Local Operating Companies (2000-2001) 01.03.2003 This report summarizes various kinds of service quality data filed by certain incumbent local... * [82]9th Annual Video Competition Report 12.31.2002 This is the Commissions ninth annual report (2002 Report) to Congress on
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/imp_rpt.html?page=18&fontsize=mediumFont
  • 43.61 International Traffic Data Reports [_] Statistics of Communications Common Carrier Reports [_] Telephone Penetration Reports [_] Telephone Subscribership Reports [_] Trends in Telephony Service [_] Video Competition Reports Apply Filter * [79]Telephone Subscribership Report (through July 2002) 02.12.2003 This is the Federal Communications Commissions (FCCs) report on telephone subscribership in... * [80]Quarterly Inquiries and Complaints Report (1st Qtr, 2003) 01.17.2003 This report tracks the top subject areas for consumer inquiries and complaints received during the... * [81]Quality of Service Report of the Local Operating Companies (2000-2001) 01.03.2003 This report summarizes various kinds of service quality data filed by certain incumbent local... * [82]9th Annual Video Competition Report 12.31.2002 This is the Commissions ninth annual report (2002 Report) to Congress on
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/imp_rpt.html?page=20
  • (FCCs) report on telephone subscribership in the... * [81]Third Broadband Progress Report 02.07.2002 The FCC released its third report on the availability of advanced telecommunications capability... * [82]High Speed Services for Internet Access (As of 06/30/01) 02.01.2002 We summarize here information from the fourth data collection, thereby presenting a snapshot of... * [83]Quarterly Inquiries and Complaints Report (1st Qtr, 2002) 01.17.2002 This report tracks the top subject areas for consumer inquiries and complaints received during the... * [84]8th Annual Video Competition Report 01.14.2002 This is the Commissions eighth annual report (2001 Report) to Congress on the status of ... * [85]Quality of Service Report of the Local Operating Companies (1999-2000) 12.05.2001 This report summarizes various kinds of service quality data filed
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/imp_rpt.html?page=20&contrast=
  • (FCCs) report on telephone subscribership in the... * [81]Third Broadband Progress Report 02.07.2002 The FCC released its third report on the availability of advanced telecommunications capability... * [82]High Speed Services for Internet Access (As of 06/30/01) 02.01.2002 We summarize here information from the fourth data collection, thereby presenting a snapshot of... * [83]Quarterly Inquiries and Complaints Report (1st Qtr, 2002) 01.17.2002 This report tracks the top subject areas for consumer inquiries and complaints received during the... * [84]8th Annual Video Competition Report 01.14.2002 This is the Commissions eighth annual report (2001 Report) to Congress on the status of ... * [85]Quality of Service Report of the Local Operating Companies (1999-2000) 12.05.2001 This report summarizes various kinds of service quality data filed
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/imp_rpt.html?page=20&contrast=highContrast
  • (FCCs) report on telephone subscribership in the... * [81]Third Broadband Progress Report 02.07.2002 The FCC released its third report on the availability of advanced telecommunications capability... * [82]High Speed Services for Internet Access (As of 06/30/01) 02.01.2002 We summarize here information from the fourth data collection, thereby presenting a snapshot of... * [83]Quarterly Inquiries and Complaints Report (1st Qtr, 2002) 01.17.2002 This report tracks the top subject areas for consumer inquiries and complaints received during the... * [84]8th Annual Video Competition Report 01.14.2002 This is the Commissions eighth annual report (2001 Report) to Congress on the status of ... * [85]Quality of Service Report of the Local Operating Companies (1999-2000) 12.05.2001 This report summarizes various kinds of service quality data filed
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/imp_rpt.html?page=20&fontsize=
  • (FCCs) report on telephone subscribership in the... * [81]Third Broadband Progress Report 02.07.2002 The FCC released its third report on the availability of advanced telecommunications capability... * [82]High Speed Services for Internet Access (As of 06/30/01) 02.01.2002 We summarize here information from the fourth data collection, thereby presenting a snapshot of... * [83]Quarterly Inquiries and Complaints Report (1st Qtr, 2002) 01.17.2002 This report tracks the top subject areas for consumer inquiries and complaints received during the... * [84]8th Annual Video Competition Report 01.14.2002 This is the Commissions eighth annual report (2001 Report) to Congress on the status of ... * [85]Quality of Service Report of the Local Operating Companies (1999-2000) 12.05.2001 This report summarizes various kinds of service quality data filed
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/imp_rpt.html?page=20&fontsize=largeFont
  • (FCCs) report on telephone subscribership in the... * [81]Third Broadband Progress Report 02.07.2002 The FCC released its third report on the availability of advanced telecommunications capability... * [82]High Speed Services for Internet Access (As of 06/30/01) 02.01.2002 We summarize here information from the fourth data collection, thereby presenting a snapshot of... * [83]Quarterly Inquiries and Complaints Report (1st Qtr, 2002) 01.17.2002 This report tracks the top subject areas for consumer inquiries and complaints received during the... * [84]8th Annual Video Competition Report 01.14.2002 This is the Commissions eighth annual report (2001 Report) to Congress on the status of ... * [85]Quality of Service Report of the Local Operating Companies (1999-2000) 12.05.2001 This report summarizes various kinds of service quality data filed
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/imp_rpt.html?page=20&fontsize=mediumFont
  • (FCCs) report on telephone subscribership in the... * [81]Third Broadband Progress Report 02.07.2002 The FCC released its third report on the availability of advanced telecommunications capability... * [82]High Speed Services for Internet Access (As of 06/30/01) 02.01.2002 We summarize here information from the fourth data collection, thereby presenting a snapshot of... * [83]Quarterly Inquiries and Complaints Report (1st Qtr, 2002) 01.17.2002 This report tracks the top subject areas for consumer inquiries and complaints received during the... * [84]8th Annual Video Competition Report 01.14.2002 This is the Commissions eighth annual report (2001 Report) to Congress on the status of ... * [85]Quality of Service Report of the Local Operating Companies (1999-2000) 12.05.2001 This report summarizes various kinds of service quality data filed
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/imp_rpt.html?page=4
  • 43.61 International Traffic Data Reports [_] Statistics of Communications Common Carrier Reports [_] Telephone Penetration Reports [_] Telephone Subscribership Reports [_] Trends in Telephony Service [_] Video Competition Reports Apply Filter * [79]Telephone Subscribership Report (through November 2009) 02.02.2010 This is the Federal Communications Commissions (FCCs) report on telephone subscribership in... * [80]Quarterly Inquiries and Complaints Report (1st Qtr, 2010) 01.17.2010 This report tracks the top subject areas for consumer inquiries and complaints received during the... * [81]Quality of Service Report of the Local Operating Companies (2007-2008) 12.24.2009 This report summarizes the Automated Reporting Management Information System (ARMIS) service... * [82]Telephone Subscribership Report (through July 2009) 12.15.2009 This is the Federal Communications Commissions (FCCs) report on telephone subscribership in... * [83]Quarterly
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/imp_rpt.html?page=4&contrast=
  • 43.61 International Traffic Data Reports [_] Statistics of Communications Common Carrier Reports [_] Telephone Penetration Reports [_] Telephone Subscribership Reports [_] Trends in Telephony Service [_] Video Competition Reports Apply Filter * [79]Telephone Subscribership Report (through November 2009) 02.02.2010 This is the Federal Communications Commissions (FCCs) report on telephone subscribership in... * [80]Quarterly Inquiries and Complaints Report (1st Qtr, 2010) 01.17.2010 This report tracks the top subject areas for consumer inquiries and complaints received during the... * [81]Quality of Service Report of the Local Operating Companies (2007-2008) 12.24.2009 This report summarizes the Automated Reporting Management Information System (ARMIS) service... * [82]Telephone Subscribership Report (through July 2009) 12.15.2009 This is the Federal Communications Commissions (FCCs) report on telephone subscribership in... * [83]Quarterly
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/imp_rpt.html?page=4&contrast=highContrast
  • 43.61 International Traffic Data Reports [_] Statistics of Communications Common Carrier Reports [_] Telephone Penetration Reports [_] Telephone Subscribership Reports [_] Trends in Telephony Service [_] Video Competition Reports Apply Filter * [79]Telephone Subscribership Report (through November 2009) 02.02.2010 This is the Federal Communications Commissions (FCCs) report on telephone subscribership in... * [80]Quarterly Inquiries and Complaints Report (1st Qtr, 2010) 01.17.2010 This report tracks the top subject areas for consumer inquiries and complaints received during the... * [81]Quality of Service Report of the Local Operating Companies (2007-2008) 12.24.2009 This report summarizes the Automated Reporting Management Information System (ARMIS) service... * [82]Telephone Subscribership Report (through July 2009) 12.15.2009 This is the Federal Communications Commissions (FCCs) report on telephone subscribership in... * [83]Quarterly
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/imp_rpt.html?page=4&fontsize=
  • 43.61 International Traffic Data Reports [_] Statistics of Communications Common Carrier Reports [_] Telephone Penetration Reports [_] Telephone Subscribership Reports [_] Trends in Telephony Service [_] Video Competition Reports Apply Filter * [79]Telephone Subscribership Report (through November 2009) 02.02.2010 This is the Federal Communications Commissions (FCCs) report on telephone subscribership in... * [80]Quarterly Inquiries and Complaints Report (1st Qtr, 2010) 01.17.2010 This report tracks the top subject areas for consumer inquiries and complaints received during the... * [81]Quality of Service Report of the Local Operating Companies (2007-2008) 12.24.2009 This report summarizes the Automated Reporting Management Information System (ARMIS) service... * [82]Telephone Subscribership Report (through July 2009) 12.15.2009 This is the Federal Communications Commissions (FCCs) report on telephone subscribership in... * [83]Quarterly
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/imp_rpt.html?page=4&fontsize=largeFont
  • 43.61 International Traffic Data Reports [_] Statistics of Communications Common Carrier Reports [_] Telephone Penetration Reports [_] Telephone Subscribership Reports [_] Trends in Telephony Service [_] Video Competition Reports Apply Filter * [79]Telephone Subscribership Report (through November 2009) 02.02.2010 This is the Federal Communications Commissions (FCCs) report on telephone subscribership in... * [80]Quarterly Inquiries and Complaints Report (1st Qtr, 2010) 01.17.2010 This report tracks the top subject areas for consumer inquiries and complaints received during the... * [81]Quality of Service Report of the Local Operating Companies (2007-2008) 12.24.2009 This report summarizes the Automated Reporting Management Information System (ARMIS) service... * [82]Telephone Subscribership Report (through July 2009) 12.15.2009 This is the Federal Communications Commissions (FCCs) report on telephone subscribership in... * [83]Quarterly
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/imp_rpt.html?page=4&fontsize=mediumFont
  • 43.61 International Traffic Data Reports [_] Statistics of Communications Common Carrier Reports [_] Telephone Penetration Reports [_] Telephone Subscribership Reports [_] Trends in Telephony Service [_] Video Competition Reports Apply Filter * [79]Telephone Subscribership Report (through November 2009) 02.02.2010 This is the Federal Communications Commissions (FCCs) report on telephone subscribership in... * [80]Quarterly Inquiries and Complaints Report (1st Qtr, 2010) 01.17.2010 This report tracks the top subject areas for consumer inquiries and complaints received during the... * [81]Quality of Service Report of the Local Operating Companies (2007-2008) 12.24.2009 This report summarizes the Automated Reporting Management Information System (ARMIS) service... * [82]Telephone Subscribership Report (through July 2009) 12.15.2009 This is the Federal Communications Commissions (FCCs) report on telephone subscribership in... * [83]Quarterly
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/imp_rpt.html?page=9
  • its annual year-end circuit status report for U.... * [86]Trends in Telephony Service (2007) 02.01.2007 Trends in Telephone Service is published by the Industry Analysis and Technology Division of... * [87]High Speed Services for Internet Access (As of 06/30/06) 01.31.2007 We summarize here information from the fourteenth semi-annual data collection, thereby presenting a... * [88]Telephone Subscribership Report (through July 2006) 01.17.2007 This is the Federal Communications Commissions (FCCs) report on telephone subscribership in... * [89] * [90] * * [91]6 * [92]7 * [93]8 * [94]9 * 10 * [95]11 * [96]12 * [97]13 * [98]14 * * [99] * [100] Connect * [101]Facebook * [102]Twitter * [103]YouTube * [104]Flickr Share this page * Reddit * Digg * Facebook * Twitter
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/imp_rpt.html?page=9&contrast=
  • its annual year-end circuit status report for U.... * [86]Trends in Telephony Service (2007) 02.01.2007 Trends in Telephone Service is published by the Industry Analysis and Technology Division of... * [87]High Speed Services for Internet Access (As of 06/30/06) 01.31.2007 We summarize here information from the fourteenth semi-annual data collection, thereby presenting a... * [88]Telephone Subscribership Report (through July 2006) 01.17.2007 This is the Federal Communications Commissions (FCCs) report on telephone subscribership in... * [89] * [90] * * [91]6 * [92]7 * [93]8 * [94]9 * 10 * [95]11 * [96]12 * [97]13 * [98]14 * * [99] * [100] Connect * [101]Facebook * [102]Twitter * [103]YouTube * [104]Flickr Share this page * Reddit * Digg * Facebook * Twitter
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/imp_rpt.html?page=9&contrast=highContrast
  • its annual year-end circuit status report for U.... * [86]Trends in Telephony Service (2007) 02.01.2007 Trends in Telephone Service is published by the Industry Analysis and Technology Division of... * [87]High Speed Services for Internet Access (As of 06/30/06) 01.31.2007 We summarize here information from the fourteenth semi-annual data collection, thereby presenting a... * [88]Telephone Subscribership Report (through July 2006) 01.17.2007 This is the Federal Communications Commissions (FCCs) report on telephone subscribership in... * [89] * [90] * * [91]6 * [92]7 * [93]8 * [94]9 * 10 * [95]11 * [96]12 * [97]13 * [98]14 * * [99] * [100] Connect * [101]Facebook * [102]Twitter * [103]YouTube * [104]Flickr Share this page * Reddit * Digg * Facebook * Twitter
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/imp_rpt.html?page=9&fontsize=
  • its annual year-end circuit status report for U.... * [86]Trends in Telephony Service (2007) 02.01.2007 Trends in Telephone Service is published by the Industry Analysis and Technology Division of... * [87]High Speed Services for Internet Access (As of 06/30/06) 01.31.2007 We summarize here information from the fourteenth semi-annual data collection, thereby presenting a... * [88]Telephone Subscribership Report (through July 2006) 01.17.2007 This is the Federal Communications Commissions (FCCs) report on telephone subscribership in... * [89] * [90] * * [91]6 * [92]7 * [93]8 * [94]9 * 10 * [95]11 * [96]12 * [97]13 * [98]14 * * [99] * [100] Connect * [101]Facebook * [102]Twitter * [103]YouTube * [104]Flickr Share this page * Reddit * Digg * Facebook * Twitter
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/imp_rpt.html?page=9&fontsize=largeFont
  • its annual year-end circuit status report for U.... * [86]Trends in Telephony Service (2007) 02.01.2007 Trends in Telephone Service is published by the Industry Analysis and Technology Division of... * [87]High Speed Services for Internet Access (As of 06/30/06) 01.31.2007 We summarize here information from the fourteenth semi-annual data collection, thereby presenting a... * [88]Telephone Subscribership Report (through July 2006) 01.17.2007 This is the Federal Communications Commissions (FCCs) report on telephone subscribership in... * [89] * [90] * * [91]6 * [92]7 * [93]8 * [94]9 * 10 * [95]11 * [96]12 * [97]13 * [98]14 * * [99] * [100] Connect * [101]Facebook * [102]Twitter * [103]YouTube * [104]Flickr Share this page * Reddit * Digg * Facebook * Twitter
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/imp_rpt.html?page=9&fontsize=mediumFont
  • its annual year-end circuit status report for U.... * [86]Trends in Telephony Service (2007) 02.01.2007 Trends in Telephone Service is published by the Industry Analysis and Technology Division of... * [87]High Speed Services for Internet Access (As of 06/30/06) 01.31.2007 We summarize here information from the fourteenth semi-annual data collection, thereby presenting a... * [88]Telephone Subscribership Report (through July 2006) 01.17.2007 This is the Federal Communications Commissions (FCCs) report on telephone subscribership in... * [89] * [90] * * [91]6 * [92]7 * [93]8 * [94]9 * 10 * [95]11 * [96]12 * [97]13 * [98]14 * * [99] * [100] Connect * [101]Facebook * [102]Twitter * [103]YouTube * [104]Flickr Share this page * Reddit * Digg * Facebook * Twitter
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/performance1999.html?page=10
  • to Congress as required by the Orbit Act [_] Satellite Competition Reports [_] Section 257 Triennial Reports [_] Section 43.61 International Traffic Data Reports [_] Statistics of Communications Common Carrier Reports [_] Telephone Penetration Reports [_] Telephone Subscribership Reports [_] Trends in Telephony Service [_] Video Competition Reports Apply Filter * [79]Numbering Resource Utilization in the U.S. (As of 12/31/05) 01.17.2007 This is the Federal Communications Commissions report on numbering resource utilization in... * [80]Local Telephone Competition (As of 06/30/06) 01.07.2007 We present here summary statistics of the latest data on local telephone service competition in... * [81]Report on Cable Industry Prices (2005) 12.27.2006 Section 623(k) of the Communications Act, as amended by the Cable Television Consumer ... * [82]Commercial Mobile
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/performance1999.html?page=10&contrast=
  • to Congress as required by the Orbit Act [_] Satellite Competition Reports [_] Section 257 Triennial Reports [_] Section 43.61 International Traffic Data Reports [_] Statistics of Communications Common Carrier Reports [_] Telephone Penetration Reports [_] Telephone Subscribership Reports [_] Trends in Telephony Service [_] Video Competition Reports Apply Filter * [79]Numbering Resource Utilization in the U.S. (As of 12/31/05) 01.17.2007 This is the Federal Communications Commissions report on numbering resource utilization in... * [80]Local Telephone Competition (As of 06/30/06) 01.07.2007 We present here summary statistics of the latest data on local telephone service competition in... * [81]Report on Cable Industry Prices (2005) 12.27.2006 Section 623(k) of the Communications Act, as amended by the Cable Television Consumer ... * [82]Commercial Mobile
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/performance1999.html?page=10&contrast=highContrast
  • to Congress as required by the Orbit Act [_] Satellite Competition Reports [_] Section 257 Triennial Reports [_] Section 43.61 International Traffic Data Reports [_] Statistics of Communications Common Carrier Reports [_] Telephone Penetration Reports [_] Telephone Subscribership Reports [_] Trends in Telephony Service [_] Video Competition Reports Apply Filter * [79]Numbering Resource Utilization in the U.S. (As of 12/31/05) 01.17.2007 This is the Federal Communications Commissions report on numbering resource utilization in... * [80]Local Telephone Competition (As of 06/30/06) 01.07.2007 We present here summary statistics of the latest data on local telephone service competition in... * [81]Report on Cable Industry Prices (2005) 12.27.2006 Section 623(k) of the Communications Act, as amended by the Cable Television Consumer ... * [82]Commercial Mobile
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/performance1999.html?page=10&fontsize=
  • to Congress as required by the Orbit Act [_] Satellite Competition Reports [_] Section 257 Triennial Reports [_] Section 43.61 International Traffic Data Reports [_] Statistics of Communications Common Carrier Reports [_] Telephone Penetration Reports [_] Telephone Subscribership Reports [_] Trends in Telephony Service [_] Video Competition Reports Apply Filter * [79]Numbering Resource Utilization in the U.S. (As of 12/31/05) 01.17.2007 This is the Federal Communications Commissions report on numbering resource utilization in... * [80]Local Telephone Competition (As of 06/30/06) 01.07.2007 We present here summary statistics of the latest data on local telephone service competition in... * [81]Report on Cable Industry Prices (2005) 12.27.2006 Section 623(k) of the Communications Act, as amended by the Cable Television Consumer ... * [82]Commercial Mobile
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/performance1999.html?page=10&fontsize=largeFont
  • to Congress as required by the Orbit Act [_] Satellite Competition Reports [_] Section 257 Triennial Reports [_] Section 43.61 International Traffic Data Reports [_] Statistics of Communications Common Carrier Reports [_] Telephone Penetration Reports [_] Telephone Subscribership Reports [_] Trends in Telephony Service [_] Video Competition Reports Apply Filter * [79]Numbering Resource Utilization in the U.S. (As of 12/31/05) 01.17.2007 This is the Federal Communications Commissions report on numbering resource utilization in... * [80]Local Telephone Competition (As of 06/30/06) 01.07.2007 We present here summary statistics of the latest data on local telephone service competition in... * [81]Report on Cable Industry Prices (2005) 12.27.2006 Section 623(k) of the Communications Act, as amended by the Cable Television Consumer ... * [82]Commercial Mobile
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/performance1999.html?page=10&fontsize=mediumFont
  • to Congress as required by the Orbit Act [_] Satellite Competition Reports [_] Section 257 Triennial Reports [_] Section 43.61 International Traffic Data Reports [_] Statistics of Communications Common Carrier Reports [_] Telephone Penetration Reports [_] Telephone Subscribership Reports [_] Trends in Telephony Service [_] Video Competition Reports Apply Filter * [79]Numbering Resource Utilization in the U.S. (As of 12/31/05) 01.17.2007 This is the Federal Communications Commissions report on numbering resource utilization in... * [80]Local Telephone Competition (As of 06/30/06) 01.07.2007 We present here summary statistics of the latest data on local telephone service competition in... * [81]Report on Cable Industry Prices (2005) 12.27.2006 Section 623(k) of the Communications Act, as amended by the Cable Television Consumer ... * [82]Commercial Mobile
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/performance1999.html?page=18
  • 43.61 International Traffic Data Reports [_] Statistics of Communications Common Carrier Reports [_] Telephone Penetration Reports [_] Telephone Subscribership Reports [_] Trends in Telephony Service [_] Video Competition Reports Apply Filter * [79]Telephone Subscribership Report (through July 2002) 02.12.2003 This is the Federal Communications Commissions (FCCs) report on telephone subscribership in... * [80]Quarterly Inquiries and Complaints Report (1st Qtr, 2003) 01.17.2003 This report tracks the top subject areas for consumer inquiries and complaints received during the... * [81]Quality of Service Report of the Local Operating Companies (2000-2001) 01.03.2003 This report summarizes various kinds of service quality data filed by certain incumbent local... * [82]9th Annual Video Competition Report 12.31.2002 This is the Commissions ninth annual report (2002 Report) to Congress on
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/performance1999.html?page=18&contrast=
  • 43.61 International Traffic Data Reports [_] Statistics of Communications Common Carrier Reports [_] Telephone Penetration Reports [_] Telephone Subscribership Reports [_] Trends in Telephony Service [_] Video Competition Reports Apply Filter * [79]Telephone Subscribership Report (through July 2002) 02.12.2003 This is the Federal Communications Commissions (FCCs) report on telephone subscribership in... * [80]Quarterly Inquiries and Complaints Report (1st Qtr, 2003) 01.17.2003 This report tracks the top subject areas for consumer inquiries and complaints received during the... * [81]Quality of Service Report of the Local Operating Companies (2000-2001) 01.03.2003 This report summarizes various kinds of service quality data filed by certain incumbent local... * [82]9th Annual Video Competition Report 12.31.2002 This is the Commissions ninth annual report (2002 Report) to Congress on
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/performance1999.html?page=18&contrast=highContrast
  • 43.61 International Traffic Data Reports [_] Statistics of Communications Common Carrier Reports [_] Telephone Penetration Reports [_] Telephone Subscribership Reports [_] Trends in Telephony Service [_] Video Competition Reports Apply Filter * [79]Telephone Subscribership Report (through July 2002) 02.12.2003 This is the Federal Communications Commissions (FCCs) report on telephone subscribership in... * [80]Quarterly Inquiries and Complaints Report (1st Qtr, 2003) 01.17.2003 This report tracks the top subject areas for consumer inquiries and complaints received during the... * [81]Quality of Service Report of the Local Operating Companies (2000-2001) 01.03.2003 This report summarizes various kinds of service quality data filed by certain incumbent local... * [82]9th Annual Video Competition Report 12.31.2002 This is the Commissions ninth annual report (2002 Report) to Congress on
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/performance1999.html?page=18&fontsize=
  • 43.61 International Traffic Data Reports [_] Statistics of Communications Common Carrier Reports [_] Telephone Penetration Reports [_] Telephone Subscribership Reports [_] Trends in Telephony Service [_] Video Competition Reports Apply Filter * [79]Telephone Subscribership Report (through July 2002) 02.12.2003 This is the Federal Communications Commissions (FCCs) report on telephone subscribership in... * [80]Quarterly Inquiries and Complaints Report (1st Qtr, 2003) 01.17.2003 This report tracks the top subject areas for consumer inquiries and complaints received during the... * [81]Quality of Service Report of the Local Operating Companies (2000-2001) 01.03.2003 This report summarizes various kinds of service quality data filed by certain incumbent local... * [82]9th Annual Video Competition Report 12.31.2002 This is the Commissions ninth annual report (2002 Report) to Congress on
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/performance1999.html?page=18&fontsize=largeFont
  • 43.61 International Traffic Data Reports [_] Statistics of Communications Common Carrier Reports [_] Telephone Penetration Reports [_] Telephone Subscribership Reports [_] Trends in Telephony Service [_] Video Competition Reports Apply Filter * [79]Telephone Subscribership Report (through July 2002) 02.12.2003 This is the Federal Communications Commissions (FCCs) report on telephone subscribership in... * [80]Quarterly Inquiries and Complaints Report (1st Qtr, 2003) 01.17.2003 This report tracks the top subject areas for consumer inquiries and complaints received during the... * [81]Quality of Service Report of the Local Operating Companies (2000-2001) 01.03.2003 This report summarizes various kinds of service quality data filed by certain incumbent local... * [82]9th Annual Video Competition Report 12.31.2002 This is the Commissions ninth annual report (2002 Report) to Congress on
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/performance1999.html?page=18&fontsize=mediumFont
  • 43.61 International Traffic Data Reports [_] Statistics of Communications Common Carrier Reports [_] Telephone Penetration Reports [_] Telephone Subscribership Reports [_] Trends in Telephony Service [_] Video Competition Reports Apply Filter * [79]Telephone Subscribership Report (through July 2002) 02.12.2003 This is the Federal Communications Commissions (FCCs) report on telephone subscribership in... * [80]Quarterly Inquiries and Complaints Report (1st Qtr, 2003) 01.17.2003 This report tracks the top subject areas for consumer inquiries and complaints received during the... * [81]Quality of Service Report of the Local Operating Companies (2000-2001) 01.03.2003 This report summarizes various kinds of service quality data filed by certain incumbent local... * [82]9th Annual Video Competition Report 12.31.2002 This is the Commissions ninth annual report (2002 Report) to Congress on
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/performance1999.html?page=20
  • (FCCs) report on telephone subscribership in the... * [81]Third Broadband Progress Report 02.07.2002 The FCC released its third report on the availability of advanced telecommunications capability... * [82]High Speed Services for Internet Access (As of 06/30/01) 02.01.2002 We summarize here information from the fourth data collection, thereby presenting a snapshot of... * [83]Quarterly Inquiries and Complaints Report (1st Qtr, 2002) 01.17.2002 This report tracks the top subject areas for consumer inquiries and complaints received during the... * [84]8th Annual Video Competition Report 01.14.2002 This is the Commissions eighth annual report (2001 Report) to Congress on the status of ... * [85]Quality of Service Report of the Local Operating Companies (1999-2000) 12.05.2001 This report summarizes various kinds of service quality data filed
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/performance1999.html?page=20&contrast=
  • (FCCs) report on telephone subscribership in the... * [81]Third Broadband Progress Report 02.07.2002 The FCC released its third report on the availability of advanced telecommunications capability... * [82]High Speed Services for Internet Access (As of 06/30/01) 02.01.2002 We summarize here information from the fourth data collection, thereby presenting a snapshot of... * [83]Quarterly Inquiries and Complaints Report (1st Qtr, 2002) 01.17.2002 This report tracks the top subject areas for consumer inquiries and complaints received during the... * [84]8th Annual Video Competition Report 01.14.2002 This is the Commissions eighth annual report (2001 Report) to Congress on the status of ... * [85]Quality of Service Report of the Local Operating Companies (1999-2000) 12.05.2001 This report summarizes various kinds of service quality data filed
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/performance1999.html?page=20&contrast=highContrast
  • (FCCs) report on telephone subscribership in the... * [81]Third Broadband Progress Report 02.07.2002 The FCC released its third report on the availability of advanced telecommunications capability... * [82]High Speed Services for Internet Access (As of 06/30/01) 02.01.2002 We summarize here information from the fourth data collection, thereby presenting a snapshot of... * [83]Quarterly Inquiries and Complaints Report (1st Qtr, 2002) 01.17.2002 This report tracks the top subject areas for consumer inquiries and complaints received during the... * [84]8th Annual Video Competition Report 01.14.2002 This is the Commissions eighth annual report (2001 Report) to Congress on the status of ... * [85]Quality of Service Report of the Local Operating Companies (1999-2000) 12.05.2001 This report summarizes various kinds of service quality data filed
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/performance1999.html?page=20&fontsize=
  • (FCCs) report on telephone subscribership in the... * [81]Third Broadband Progress Report 02.07.2002 The FCC released its third report on the availability of advanced telecommunications capability... * [82]High Speed Services for Internet Access (As of 06/30/01) 02.01.2002 We summarize here information from the fourth data collection, thereby presenting a snapshot of... * [83]Quarterly Inquiries and Complaints Report (1st Qtr, 2002) 01.17.2002 This report tracks the top subject areas for consumer inquiries and complaints received during the... * [84]8th Annual Video Competition Report 01.14.2002 This is the Commissions eighth annual report (2001 Report) to Congress on the status of ... * [85]Quality of Service Report of the Local Operating Companies (1999-2000) 12.05.2001 This report summarizes various kinds of service quality data filed
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/performance1999.html?page=20&fontsize=largeFont
  • (FCCs) report on telephone subscribership in the... * [81]Third Broadband Progress Report 02.07.2002 The FCC released its third report on the availability of advanced telecommunications capability... * [82]High Speed Services for Internet Access (As of 06/30/01) 02.01.2002 We summarize here information from the fourth data collection, thereby presenting a snapshot of... * [83]Quarterly Inquiries and Complaints Report (1st Qtr, 2002) 01.17.2002 This report tracks the top subject areas for consumer inquiries and complaints received during the... * [84]8th Annual Video Competition Report 01.14.2002 This is the Commissions eighth annual report (2001 Report) to Congress on the status of ... * [85]Quality of Service Report of the Local Operating Companies (1999-2000) 12.05.2001 This report summarizes various kinds of service quality data filed
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/performance1999.html?page=20&fontsize=mediumFont
  • (FCCs) report on telephone subscribership in the... * [81]Third Broadband Progress Report 02.07.2002 The FCC released its third report on the availability of advanced telecommunications capability... * [82]High Speed Services for Internet Access (As of 06/30/01) 02.01.2002 We summarize here information from the fourth data collection, thereby presenting a snapshot of... * [83]Quarterly Inquiries and Complaints Report (1st Qtr, 2002) 01.17.2002 This report tracks the top subject areas for consumer inquiries and complaints received during the... * [84]8th Annual Video Competition Report 01.14.2002 This is the Commissions eighth annual report (2001 Report) to Congress on the status of ... * [85]Quality of Service Report of the Local Operating Companies (1999-2000) 12.05.2001 This report summarizes various kinds of service quality data filed
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/performance1999.html?page=4
  • 43.61 International Traffic Data Reports [_] Statistics of Communications Common Carrier Reports [_] Telephone Penetration Reports [_] Telephone Subscribership Reports [_] Trends in Telephony Service [_] Video Competition Reports Apply Filter * [79]Telephone Subscribership Report (through November 2009) 02.02.2010 This is the Federal Communications Commissions (FCCs) report on telephone subscribership in... * [80]Quarterly Inquiries and Complaints Report (1st Qtr, 2010) 01.17.2010 This report tracks the top subject areas for consumer inquiries and complaints received during the... * [81]Quality of Service Report of the Local Operating Companies (2007-2008) 12.24.2009 This report summarizes the Automated Reporting Management Information System (ARMIS) service... * [82]Telephone Subscribership Report (through July 2009) 12.15.2009 This is the Federal Communications Commissions (FCCs) report on telephone subscribership in... * [83]Quarterly
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/performance1999.html?page=4&contrast=
  • 43.61 International Traffic Data Reports [_] Statistics of Communications Common Carrier Reports [_] Telephone Penetration Reports [_] Telephone Subscribership Reports [_] Trends in Telephony Service [_] Video Competition Reports Apply Filter * [79]Telephone Subscribership Report (through November 2009) 02.02.2010 This is the Federal Communications Commissions (FCCs) report on telephone subscribership in... * [80]Quarterly Inquiries and Complaints Report (1st Qtr, 2010) 01.17.2010 This report tracks the top subject areas for consumer inquiries and complaints received during the... * [81]Quality of Service Report of the Local Operating Companies (2007-2008) 12.24.2009 This report summarizes the Automated Reporting Management Information System (ARMIS) service... * [82]Telephone Subscribership Report (through July 2009) 12.15.2009 This is the Federal Communications Commissions (FCCs) report on telephone subscribership in... * [83]Quarterly
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/performance1999.html?page=4&contrast=highContrast
  • 43.61 International Traffic Data Reports [_] Statistics of Communications Common Carrier Reports [_] Telephone Penetration Reports [_] Telephone Subscribership Reports [_] Trends in Telephony Service [_] Video Competition Reports Apply Filter * [79]Telephone Subscribership Report (through November 2009) 02.02.2010 This is the Federal Communications Commissions (FCCs) report on telephone subscribership in... * [80]Quarterly Inquiries and Complaints Report (1st Qtr, 2010) 01.17.2010 This report tracks the top subject areas for consumer inquiries and complaints received during the... * [81]Quality of Service Report of the Local Operating Companies (2007-2008) 12.24.2009 This report summarizes the Automated Reporting Management Information System (ARMIS) service... * [82]Telephone Subscribership Report (through July 2009) 12.15.2009 This is the Federal Communications Commissions (FCCs) report on telephone subscribership in... * [83]Quarterly
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/performance1999.html?page=4&fontsize=
  • 43.61 International Traffic Data Reports [_] Statistics of Communications Common Carrier Reports [_] Telephone Penetration Reports [_] Telephone Subscribership Reports [_] Trends in Telephony Service [_] Video Competition Reports Apply Filter * [79]Telephone Subscribership Report (through November 2009) 02.02.2010 This is the Federal Communications Commissions (FCCs) report on telephone subscribership in... * [80]Quarterly Inquiries and Complaints Report (1st Qtr, 2010) 01.17.2010 This report tracks the top subject areas for consumer inquiries and complaints received during the... * [81]Quality of Service Report of the Local Operating Companies (2007-2008) 12.24.2009 This report summarizes the Automated Reporting Management Information System (ARMIS) service... * [82]Telephone Subscribership Report (through July 2009) 12.15.2009 This is the Federal Communications Commissions (FCCs) report on telephone subscribership in... * [83]Quarterly
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/performance1999.html?page=4&fontsize=largeFont
  • 43.61 International Traffic Data Reports [_] Statistics of Communications Common Carrier Reports [_] Telephone Penetration Reports [_] Telephone Subscribership Reports [_] Trends in Telephony Service [_] Video Competition Reports Apply Filter * [79]Telephone Subscribership Report (through November 2009) 02.02.2010 This is the Federal Communications Commissions (FCCs) report on telephone subscribership in... * [80]Quarterly Inquiries and Complaints Report (1st Qtr, 2010) 01.17.2010 This report tracks the top subject areas for consumer inquiries and complaints received during the... * [81]Quality of Service Report of the Local Operating Companies (2007-2008) 12.24.2009 This report summarizes the Automated Reporting Management Information System (ARMIS) service... * [82]Telephone Subscribership Report (through July 2009) 12.15.2009 This is the Federal Communications Commissions (FCCs) report on telephone subscribership in... * [83]Quarterly
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/performance1999.html?page=4&fontsize=mediumFont
  • 43.61 International Traffic Data Reports [_] Statistics of Communications Common Carrier Reports [_] Telephone Penetration Reports [_] Telephone Subscribership Reports [_] Trends in Telephony Service [_] Video Competition Reports Apply Filter * [79]Telephone Subscribership Report (through November 2009) 02.02.2010 This is the Federal Communications Commissions (FCCs) report on telephone subscribership in... * [80]Quarterly Inquiries and Complaints Report (1st Qtr, 2010) 01.17.2010 This report tracks the top subject areas for consumer inquiries and complaints received during the... * [81]Quality of Service Report of the Local Operating Companies (2007-2008) 12.24.2009 This report summarizes the Automated Reporting Management Information System (ARMIS) service... * [82]Telephone Subscribership Report (through July 2009) 12.15.2009 This is the Federal Communications Commissions (FCCs) report on telephone subscribership in... * [83]Quarterly
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/performance1999.html?page=9
  • its annual year-end circuit status report for U.... * [86]Trends in Telephony Service (2007) 02.01.2007 Trends in Telephone Service is published by the Industry Analysis and Technology Division of... * [87]High Speed Services for Internet Access (As of 06/30/06) 01.31.2007 We summarize here information from the fourteenth semi-annual data collection, thereby presenting a... * [88]Telephone Subscribership Report (through July 2006) 01.17.2007 This is the Federal Communications Commissions (FCCs) report on telephone subscribership in... * [89] * [90] * * [91]6 * [92]7 * [93]8 * [94]9 * 10 * [95]11 * [96]12 * [97]13 * [98]14 * * [99] * [100] Connect * [101]Facebook * [102]Twitter * [103]YouTube * [104]Flickr Share this page * Reddit * Digg * Facebook * Twitter
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/performance1999.html?page=9&contrast=
  • its annual year-end circuit status report for U.... * [86]Trends in Telephony Service (2007) 02.01.2007 Trends in Telephone Service is published by the Industry Analysis and Technology Division of... * [87]High Speed Services for Internet Access (As of 06/30/06) 01.31.2007 We summarize here information from the fourteenth semi-annual data collection, thereby presenting a... * [88]Telephone Subscribership Report (through July 2006) 01.17.2007 This is the Federal Communications Commissions (FCCs) report on telephone subscribership in... * [89] * [90] * * [91]6 * [92]7 * [93]8 * [94]9 * 10 * [95]11 * [96]12 * [97]13 * [98]14 * * [99] * [100] Connect * [101]Facebook * [102]Twitter * [103]YouTube * [104]Flickr Share this page * Reddit * Digg * Facebook * Twitter
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/performance1999.html?page=9&contrast=highContrast
  • its annual year-end circuit status report for U.... * [86]Trends in Telephony Service (2007) 02.01.2007 Trends in Telephone Service is published by the Industry Analysis and Technology Division of... * [87]High Speed Services for Internet Access (As of 06/30/06) 01.31.2007 We summarize here information from the fourteenth semi-annual data collection, thereby presenting a... * [88]Telephone Subscribership Report (through July 2006) 01.17.2007 This is the Federal Communications Commissions (FCCs) report on telephone subscribership in... * [89] * [90] * * [91]6 * [92]7 * [93]8 * [94]9 * 10 * [95]11 * [96]12 * [97]13 * [98]14 * * [99] * [100] Connect * [101]Facebook * [102]Twitter * [103]YouTube * [104]Flickr Share this page * Reddit * Digg * Facebook * Twitter
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/performance1999.html?page=9&fontsize=
  • its annual year-end circuit status report for U.... * [86]Trends in Telephony Service (2007) 02.01.2007 Trends in Telephone Service is published by the Industry Analysis and Technology Division of... * [87]High Speed Services for Internet Access (As of 06/30/06) 01.31.2007 We summarize here information from the fourteenth semi-annual data collection, thereby presenting a... * [88]Telephone Subscribership Report (through July 2006) 01.17.2007 This is the Federal Communications Commissions (FCCs) report on telephone subscribership in... * [89] * [90] * * [91]6 * [92]7 * [93]8 * [94]9 * 10 * [95]11 * [96]12 * [97]13 * [98]14 * * [99] * [100] Connect * [101]Facebook * [102]Twitter * [103]YouTube * [104]Flickr Share this page * Reddit * Digg * Facebook * Twitter
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/performance1999.html?page=9&fontsize=largeFont
  • its annual year-end circuit status report for U.... * [86]Trends in Telephony Service (2007) 02.01.2007 Trends in Telephone Service is published by the Industry Analysis and Technology Division of... * [87]High Speed Services for Internet Access (As of 06/30/06) 01.31.2007 We summarize here information from the fourteenth semi-annual data collection, thereby presenting a... * [88]Telephone Subscribership Report (through July 2006) 01.17.2007 This is the Federal Communications Commissions (FCCs) report on telephone subscribership in... * [89] * [90] * * [91]6 * [92]7 * [93]8 * [94]9 * 10 * [95]11 * [96]12 * [97]13 * [98]14 * * [99] * [100] Connect * [101]Facebook * [102]Twitter * [103]YouTube * [104]Flickr Share this page * Reddit * Digg * Facebook * Twitter
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/performance1999.html?page=9&fontsize=mediumFont
  • its annual year-end circuit status report for U.... * [86]Trends in Telephony Service (2007) 02.01.2007 Trends in Telephone Service is published by the Industry Analysis and Technology Division of... * [87]High Speed Services for Internet Access (As of 06/30/06) 01.31.2007 We summarize here information from the fourteenth semi-annual data collection, thereby presenting a... * [88]Telephone Subscribership Report (through July 2006) 01.17.2007 This is the Federal Communications Commissions (FCCs) report on telephone subscribership in... * [89] * [90] * * [91]6 * [92]7 * [93]8 * [94]9 * 10 * [95]11 * [96]12 * [97]13 * [98]14 * * [99] * [100] Connect * [101]Facebook * [102]Twitter * [103]YouTube * [104]Flickr Share this page * Reddit * Digg * Facebook * Twitter
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/reh71896.html?page=10
  • to Congress as required by the Orbit Act [_] Satellite Competition Reports [_] Section 257 Triennial Reports [_] Section 43.61 International Traffic Data Reports [_] Statistics of Communications Common Carrier Reports [_] Telephone Penetration Reports [_] Telephone Subscribership Reports [_] Trends in Telephony Service [_] Video Competition Reports Apply Filter * [79]Numbering Resource Utilization in the U.S. (As of 12/31/05) 01.17.2007 This is the Federal Communications Commissions report on numbering resource utilization in... * [80]Local Telephone Competition (As of 06/30/06) 01.07.2007 We present here summary statistics of the latest data on local telephone service competition in... * [81]Report on Cable Industry Prices (2005) 12.27.2006 Section 623(k) of the Communications Act, as amended by the Cable Television Consumer ... * [82]Commercial Mobile
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/reh71896.html?page=10&contrast=
  • to Congress as required by the Orbit Act [_] Satellite Competition Reports [_] Section 257 Triennial Reports [_] Section 43.61 International Traffic Data Reports [_] Statistics of Communications Common Carrier Reports [_] Telephone Penetration Reports [_] Telephone Subscribership Reports [_] Trends in Telephony Service [_] Video Competition Reports Apply Filter * [79]Numbering Resource Utilization in the U.S. (As of 12/31/05) 01.17.2007 This is the Federal Communications Commissions report on numbering resource utilization in... * [80]Local Telephone Competition (As of 06/30/06) 01.07.2007 We present here summary statistics of the latest data on local telephone service competition in... * [81]Report on Cable Industry Prices (2005) 12.27.2006 Section 623(k) of the Communications Act, as amended by the Cable Television Consumer ... * [82]Commercial Mobile
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/reh71896.html?page=10&contrast=highContrast
  • to Congress as required by the Orbit Act [_] Satellite Competition Reports [_] Section 257 Triennial Reports [_] Section 43.61 International Traffic Data Reports [_] Statistics of Communications Common Carrier Reports [_] Telephone Penetration Reports [_] Telephone Subscribership Reports [_] Trends in Telephony Service [_] Video Competition Reports Apply Filter * [79]Numbering Resource Utilization in the U.S. (As of 12/31/05) 01.17.2007 This is the Federal Communications Commissions report on numbering resource utilization in... * [80]Local Telephone Competition (As of 06/30/06) 01.07.2007 We present here summary statistics of the latest data on local telephone service competition in... * [81]Report on Cable Industry Prices (2005) 12.27.2006 Section 623(k) of the Communications Act, as amended by the Cable Television Consumer ... * [82]Commercial Mobile
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/reh71896.html?page=10&fontsize=
  • to Congress as required by the Orbit Act [_] Satellite Competition Reports [_] Section 257 Triennial Reports [_] Section 43.61 International Traffic Data Reports [_] Statistics of Communications Common Carrier Reports [_] Telephone Penetration Reports [_] Telephone Subscribership Reports [_] Trends in Telephony Service [_] Video Competition Reports Apply Filter * [79]Numbering Resource Utilization in the U.S. (As of 12/31/05) 01.17.2007 This is the Federal Communications Commissions report on numbering resource utilization in... * [80]Local Telephone Competition (As of 06/30/06) 01.07.2007 We present here summary statistics of the latest data on local telephone service competition in... * [81]Report on Cable Industry Prices (2005) 12.27.2006 Section 623(k) of the Communications Act, as amended by the Cable Television Consumer ... * [82]Commercial Mobile
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/reh71896.html?page=10&fontsize=largeFont
  • to Congress as required by the Orbit Act [_] Satellite Competition Reports [_] Section 257 Triennial Reports [_] Section 43.61 International Traffic Data Reports [_] Statistics of Communications Common Carrier Reports [_] Telephone Penetration Reports [_] Telephone Subscribership Reports [_] Trends in Telephony Service [_] Video Competition Reports Apply Filter * [79]Numbering Resource Utilization in the U.S. (As of 12/31/05) 01.17.2007 This is the Federal Communications Commissions report on numbering resource utilization in... * [80]Local Telephone Competition (As of 06/30/06) 01.07.2007 We present here summary statistics of the latest data on local telephone service competition in... * [81]Report on Cable Industry Prices (2005) 12.27.2006 Section 623(k) of the Communications Act, as amended by the Cable Television Consumer ... * [82]Commercial Mobile
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/reh71896.html?page=10&fontsize=mediumFont
  • to Congress as required by the Orbit Act [_] Satellite Competition Reports [_] Section 257 Triennial Reports [_] Section 43.61 International Traffic Data Reports [_] Statistics of Communications Common Carrier Reports [_] Telephone Penetration Reports [_] Telephone Subscribership Reports [_] Trends in Telephony Service [_] Video Competition Reports Apply Filter * [79]Numbering Resource Utilization in the U.S. (As of 12/31/05) 01.17.2007 This is the Federal Communications Commissions report on numbering resource utilization in... * [80]Local Telephone Competition (As of 06/30/06) 01.07.2007 We present here summary statistics of the latest data on local telephone service competition in... * [81]Report on Cable Industry Prices (2005) 12.27.2006 Section 623(k) of the Communications Act, as amended by the Cable Television Consumer ... * [82]Commercial Mobile
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/reh71896.html?page=18
  • 43.61 International Traffic Data Reports [_] Statistics of Communications Common Carrier Reports [_] Telephone Penetration Reports [_] Telephone Subscribership Reports [_] Trends in Telephony Service [_] Video Competition Reports Apply Filter * [79]Telephone Subscribership Report (through July 2002) 02.12.2003 This is the Federal Communications Commissions (FCCs) report on telephone subscribership in... * [80]Quarterly Inquiries and Complaints Report (1st Qtr, 2003) 01.17.2003 This report tracks the top subject areas for consumer inquiries and complaints received during the... * [81]Quality of Service Report of the Local Operating Companies (2000-2001) 01.03.2003 This report summarizes various kinds of service quality data filed by certain incumbent local... * [82]9th Annual Video Competition Report 12.31.2002 This is the Commissions ninth annual report (2002 Report) to Congress on
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/reh71896.html?page=18&contrast=
  • 43.61 International Traffic Data Reports [_] Statistics of Communications Common Carrier Reports [_] Telephone Penetration Reports [_] Telephone Subscribership Reports [_] Trends in Telephony Service [_] Video Competition Reports Apply Filter * [79]Telephone Subscribership Report (through July 2002) 02.12.2003 This is the Federal Communications Commissions (FCCs) report on telephone subscribership in... * [80]Quarterly Inquiries and Complaints Report (1st Qtr, 2003) 01.17.2003 This report tracks the top subject areas for consumer inquiries and complaints received during the... * [81]Quality of Service Report of the Local Operating Companies (2000-2001) 01.03.2003 This report summarizes various kinds of service quality data filed by certain incumbent local... * [82]9th Annual Video Competition Report 12.31.2002 This is the Commissions ninth annual report (2002 Report) to Congress on
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/reh71896.html?page=18&contrast=highContrast
  • 43.61 International Traffic Data Reports [_] Statistics of Communications Common Carrier Reports [_] Telephone Penetration Reports [_] Telephone Subscribership Reports [_] Trends in Telephony Service [_] Video Competition Reports Apply Filter * [79]Telephone Subscribership Report (through July 2002) 02.12.2003 This is the Federal Communications Commissions (FCCs) report on telephone subscribership in... * [80]Quarterly Inquiries and Complaints Report (1st Qtr, 2003) 01.17.2003 This report tracks the top subject areas for consumer inquiries and complaints received during the... * [81]Quality of Service Report of the Local Operating Companies (2000-2001) 01.03.2003 This report summarizes various kinds of service quality data filed by certain incumbent local... * [82]9th Annual Video Competition Report 12.31.2002 This is the Commissions ninth annual report (2002 Report) to Congress on
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/reh71896.html?page=18&fontsize=
  • 43.61 International Traffic Data Reports [_] Statistics of Communications Common Carrier Reports [_] Telephone Penetration Reports [_] Telephone Subscribership Reports [_] Trends in Telephony Service [_] Video Competition Reports Apply Filter * [79]Telephone Subscribership Report (through July 2002) 02.12.2003 This is the Federal Communications Commissions (FCCs) report on telephone subscribership in... * [80]Quarterly Inquiries and Complaints Report (1st Qtr, 2003) 01.17.2003 This report tracks the top subject areas for consumer inquiries and complaints received during the... * [81]Quality of Service Report of the Local Operating Companies (2000-2001) 01.03.2003 This report summarizes various kinds of service quality data filed by certain incumbent local... * [82]9th Annual Video Competition Report 12.31.2002 This is the Commissions ninth annual report (2002 Report) to Congress on
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/reh71896.html?page=18&fontsize=largeFont
  • 43.61 International Traffic Data Reports [_] Statistics of Communications Common Carrier Reports [_] Telephone Penetration Reports [_] Telephone Subscribership Reports [_] Trends in Telephony Service [_] Video Competition Reports Apply Filter * [79]Telephone Subscribership Report (through July 2002) 02.12.2003 This is the Federal Communications Commissions (FCCs) report on telephone subscribership in... * [80]Quarterly Inquiries and Complaints Report (1st Qtr, 2003) 01.17.2003 This report tracks the top subject areas for consumer inquiries and complaints received during the... * [81]Quality of Service Report of the Local Operating Companies (2000-2001) 01.03.2003 This report summarizes various kinds of service quality data filed by certain incumbent local... * [82]9th Annual Video Competition Report 12.31.2002 This is the Commissions ninth annual report (2002 Report) to Congress on
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/reh71896.html?page=18&fontsize=mediumFont
  • 43.61 International Traffic Data Reports [_] Statistics of Communications Common Carrier Reports [_] Telephone Penetration Reports [_] Telephone Subscribership Reports [_] Trends in Telephony Service [_] Video Competition Reports Apply Filter * [79]Telephone Subscribership Report (through July 2002) 02.12.2003 This is the Federal Communications Commissions (FCCs) report on telephone subscribership in... * [80]Quarterly Inquiries and Complaints Report (1st Qtr, 2003) 01.17.2003 This report tracks the top subject areas for consumer inquiries and complaints received during the... * [81]Quality of Service Report of the Local Operating Companies (2000-2001) 01.03.2003 This report summarizes various kinds of service quality data filed by certain incumbent local... * [82]9th Annual Video Competition Report 12.31.2002 This is the Commissions ninth annual report (2002 Report) to Congress on
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/reh71896.html?page=20
  • (FCCs) report on telephone subscribership in the... * [81]Third Broadband Progress Report 02.07.2002 The FCC released its third report on the availability of advanced telecommunications capability... * [82]High Speed Services for Internet Access (As of 06/30/01) 02.01.2002 We summarize here information from the fourth data collection, thereby presenting a snapshot of... * [83]Quarterly Inquiries and Complaints Report (1st Qtr, 2002) 01.17.2002 This report tracks the top subject areas for consumer inquiries and complaints received during the... * [84]8th Annual Video Competition Report 01.14.2002 This is the Commissions eighth annual report (2001 Report) to Congress on the status of ... * [85]Quality of Service Report of the Local Operating Companies (1999-2000) 12.05.2001 This report summarizes various kinds of service quality data filed
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/reh71896.html?page=20&contrast=
  • (FCCs) report on telephone subscribership in the... * [81]Third Broadband Progress Report 02.07.2002 The FCC released its third report on the availability of advanced telecommunications capability... * [82]High Speed Services for Internet Access (As of 06/30/01) 02.01.2002 We summarize here information from the fourth data collection, thereby presenting a snapshot of... * [83]Quarterly Inquiries and Complaints Report (1st Qtr, 2002) 01.17.2002 This report tracks the top subject areas for consumer inquiries and complaints received during the... * [84]8th Annual Video Competition Report 01.14.2002 This is the Commissions eighth annual report (2001 Report) to Congress on the status of ... * [85]Quality of Service Report of the Local Operating Companies (1999-2000) 12.05.2001 This report summarizes various kinds of service quality data filed
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/reh71896.html?page=20&contrast=highContrast
  • (FCCs) report on telephone subscribership in the... * [81]Third Broadband Progress Report 02.07.2002 The FCC released its third report on the availability of advanced telecommunications capability... * [82]High Speed Services for Internet Access (As of 06/30/01) 02.01.2002 We summarize here information from the fourth data collection, thereby presenting a snapshot of... * [83]Quarterly Inquiries and Complaints Report (1st Qtr, 2002) 01.17.2002 This report tracks the top subject areas for consumer inquiries and complaints received during the... * [84]8th Annual Video Competition Report 01.14.2002 This is the Commissions eighth annual report (2001 Report) to Congress on the status of ... * [85]Quality of Service Report of the Local Operating Companies (1999-2000) 12.05.2001 This report summarizes various kinds of service quality data filed
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/reh71896.html?page=20&fontsize=
  • (FCCs) report on telephone subscribership in the... * [81]Third Broadband Progress Report 02.07.2002 The FCC released its third report on the availability of advanced telecommunications capability... * [82]High Speed Services for Internet Access (As of 06/30/01) 02.01.2002 We summarize here information from the fourth data collection, thereby presenting a snapshot of... * [83]Quarterly Inquiries and Complaints Report (1st Qtr, 2002) 01.17.2002 This report tracks the top subject areas for consumer inquiries and complaints received during the... * [84]8th Annual Video Competition Report 01.14.2002 This is the Commissions eighth annual report (2001 Report) to Congress on the status of ... * [85]Quality of Service Report of the Local Operating Companies (1999-2000) 12.05.2001 This report summarizes various kinds of service quality data filed
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/reh71896.html?page=20&fontsize=largeFont
  • (FCCs) report on telephone subscribership in the... * [81]Third Broadband Progress Report 02.07.2002 The FCC released its third report on the availability of advanced telecommunications capability... * [82]High Speed Services for Internet Access (As of 06/30/01) 02.01.2002 We summarize here information from the fourth data collection, thereby presenting a snapshot of... * [83]Quarterly Inquiries and Complaints Report (1st Qtr, 2002) 01.17.2002 This report tracks the top subject areas for consumer inquiries and complaints received during the... * [84]8th Annual Video Competition Report 01.14.2002 This is the Commissions eighth annual report (2001 Report) to Congress on the status of ... * [85]Quality of Service Report of the Local Operating Companies (1999-2000) 12.05.2001 This report summarizes various kinds of service quality data filed
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/reh71896.html?page=20&fontsize=mediumFont
  • (FCCs) report on telephone subscribership in the... * [81]Third Broadband Progress Report 02.07.2002 The FCC released its third report on the availability of advanced telecommunications capability... * [82]High Speed Services for Internet Access (As of 06/30/01) 02.01.2002 We summarize here information from the fourth data collection, thereby presenting a snapshot of... * [83]Quarterly Inquiries and Complaints Report (1st Qtr, 2002) 01.17.2002 This report tracks the top subject areas for consumer inquiries and complaints received during the... * [84]8th Annual Video Competition Report 01.14.2002 This is the Commissions eighth annual report (2001 Report) to Congress on the status of ... * [85]Quality of Service Report of the Local Operating Companies (1999-2000) 12.05.2001 This report summarizes various kinds of service quality data filed
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/reh71896.html?page=4
  • 43.61 International Traffic Data Reports [_] Statistics of Communications Common Carrier Reports [_] Telephone Penetration Reports [_] Telephone Subscribership Reports [_] Trends in Telephony Service [_] Video Competition Reports Apply Filter * [79]Telephone Subscribership Report (through November 2009) 02.02.2010 This is the Federal Communications Commissions (FCCs) report on telephone subscribership in... * [80]Quarterly Inquiries and Complaints Report (1st Qtr, 2010) 01.17.2010 This report tracks the top subject areas for consumer inquiries and complaints received during the... * [81]Quality of Service Report of the Local Operating Companies (2007-2008) 12.24.2009 This report summarizes the Automated Reporting Management Information System (ARMIS) service... * [82]Telephone Subscribership Report (through July 2009) 12.15.2009 This is the Federal Communications Commissions (FCCs) report on telephone subscribership in... * [83]Quarterly
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/reh71896.html?page=4&contrast=
  • 43.61 International Traffic Data Reports [_] Statistics of Communications Common Carrier Reports [_] Telephone Penetration Reports [_] Telephone Subscribership Reports [_] Trends in Telephony Service [_] Video Competition Reports Apply Filter * [79]Telephone Subscribership Report (through November 2009) 02.02.2010 This is the Federal Communications Commissions (FCCs) report on telephone subscribership in... * [80]Quarterly Inquiries and Complaints Report (1st Qtr, 2010) 01.17.2010 This report tracks the top subject areas for consumer inquiries and complaints received during the... * [81]Quality of Service Report of the Local Operating Companies (2007-2008) 12.24.2009 This report summarizes the Automated Reporting Management Information System (ARMIS) service... * [82]Telephone Subscribership Report (through July 2009) 12.15.2009 This is the Federal Communications Commissions (FCCs) report on telephone subscribership in... * [83]Quarterly
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/reh71896.html?page=4&contrast=highContrast
  • 43.61 International Traffic Data Reports [_] Statistics of Communications Common Carrier Reports [_] Telephone Penetration Reports [_] Telephone Subscribership Reports [_] Trends in Telephony Service [_] Video Competition Reports Apply Filter * [79]Telephone Subscribership Report (through November 2009) 02.02.2010 This is the Federal Communications Commissions (FCCs) report on telephone subscribership in... * [80]Quarterly Inquiries and Complaints Report (1st Qtr, 2010) 01.17.2010 This report tracks the top subject areas for consumer inquiries and complaints received during the... * [81]Quality of Service Report of the Local Operating Companies (2007-2008) 12.24.2009 This report summarizes the Automated Reporting Management Information System (ARMIS) service... * [82]Telephone Subscribership Report (through July 2009) 12.15.2009 This is the Federal Communications Commissions (FCCs) report on telephone subscribership in... * [83]Quarterly
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/reh71896.html?page=4&fontsize=
  • 43.61 International Traffic Data Reports [_] Statistics of Communications Common Carrier Reports [_] Telephone Penetration Reports [_] Telephone Subscribership Reports [_] Trends in Telephony Service [_] Video Competition Reports Apply Filter * [79]Telephone Subscribership Report (through November 2009) 02.02.2010 This is the Federal Communications Commissions (FCCs) report on telephone subscribership in... * [80]Quarterly Inquiries and Complaints Report (1st Qtr, 2010) 01.17.2010 This report tracks the top subject areas for consumer inquiries and complaints received during the... * [81]Quality of Service Report of the Local Operating Companies (2007-2008) 12.24.2009 This report summarizes the Automated Reporting Management Information System (ARMIS) service... * [82]Telephone Subscribership Report (through July 2009) 12.15.2009 This is the Federal Communications Commissions (FCCs) report on telephone subscribership in... * [83]Quarterly
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/reh71896.html?page=4&fontsize=largeFont
  • 43.61 International Traffic Data Reports [_] Statistics of Communications Common Carrier Reports [_] Telephone Penetration Reports [_] Telephone Subscribership Reports [_] Trends in Telephony Service [_] Video Competition Reports Apply Filter * [79]Telephone Subscribership Report (through November 2009) 02.02.2010 This is the Federal Communications Commissions (FCCs) report on telephone subscribership in... * [80]Quarterly Inquiries and Complaints Report (1st Qtr, 2010) 01.17.2010 This report tracks the top subject areas for consumer inquiries and complaints received during the... * [81]Quality of Service Report of the Local Operating Companies (2007-2008) 12.24.2009 This report summarizes the Automated Reporting Management Information System (ARMIS) service... * [82]Telephone Subscribership Report (through July 2009) 12.15.2009 This is the Federal Communications Commissions (FCCs) report on telephone subscribership in... * [83]Quarterly
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/reh71896.html?page=4&fontsize=mediumFont
  • 43.61 International Traffic Data Reports [_] Statistics of Communications Common Carrier Reports [_] Telephone Penetration Reports [_] Telephone Subscribership Reports [_] Trends in Telephony Service [_] Video Competition Reports Apply Filter * [79]Telephone Subscribership Report (through November 2009) 02.02.2010 This is the Federal Communications Commissions (FCCs) report on telephone subscribership in... * [80]Quarterly Inquiries and Complaints Report (1st Qtr, 2010) 01.17.2010 This report tracks the top subject areas for consumer inquiries and complaints received during the... * [81]Quality of Service Report of the Local Operating Companies (2007-2008) 12.24.2009 This report summarizes the Automated Reporting Management Information System (ARMIS) service... * [82]Telephone Subscribership Report (through July 2009) 12.15.2009 This is the Federal Communications Commissions (FCCs) report on telephone subscribership in... * [83]Quarterly
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/reh71896.html?page=9
  • its annual year-end circuit status report for U.... * [86]Trends in Telephony Service (2007) 02.01.2007 Trends in Telephone Service is published by the Industry Analysis and Technology Division of... * [87]High Speed Services for Internet Access (As of 06/30/06) 01.31.2007 We summarize here information from the fourteenth semi-annual data collection, thereby presenting a... * [88]Telephone Subscribership Report (through July 2006) 01.17.2007 This is the Federal Communications Commissions (FCCs) report on telephone subscribership in... * [89] * [90] * * [91]6 * [92]7 * [93]8 * [94]9 * 10 * [95]11 * [96]12 * [97]13 * [98]14 * * [99] * [100] Connect * [101]Facebook * [102]Twitter * [103]YouTube * [104]Flickr Share this page * Reddit * Digg * Facebook * Twitter
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/reh71896.html?page=9&contrast=
  • its annual year-end circuit status report for U.... * [86]Trends in Telephony Service (2007) 02.01.2007 Trends in Telephone Service is published by the Industry Analysis and Technology Division of... * [87]High Speed Services for Internet Access (As of 06/30/06) 01.31.2007 We summarize here information from the fourteenth semi-annual data collection, thereby presenting a... * [88]Telephone Subscribership Report (through July 2006) 01.17.2007 This is the Federal Communications Commissions (FCCs) report on telephone subscribership in... * [89] * [90] * * [91]6 * [92]7 * [93]8 * [94]9 * 10 * [95]11 * [96]12 * [97]13 * [98]14 * * [99] * [100] Connect * [101]Facebook * [102]Twitter * [103]YouTube * [104]Flickr Share this page * Reddit * Digg * Facebook * Twitter
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/reh71896.html?page=9&contrast=highContrast
  • its annual year-end circuit status report for U.... * [86]Trends in Telephony Service (2007) 02.01.2007 Trends in Telephone Service is published by the Industry Analysis and Technology Division of... * [87]High Speed Services for Internet Access (As of 06/30/06) 01.31.2007 We summarize here information from the fourteenth semi-annual data collection, thereby presenting a... * [88]Telephone Subscribership Report (through July 2006) 01.17.2007 This is the Federal Communications Commissions (FCCs) report on telephone subscribership in... * [89] * [90] * * [91]6 * [92]7 * [93]8 * [94]9 * 10 * [95]11 * [96]12 * [97]13 * [98]14 * * [99] * [100] Connect * [101]Facebook * [102]Twitter * [103]YouTube * [104]Flickr Share this page * Reddit * Digg * Facebook * Twitter
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/reh71896.html?page=9&fontsize=
  • its annual year-end circuit status report for U.... * [86]Trends in Telephony Service (2007) 02.01.2007 Trends in Telephone Service is published by the Industry Analysis and Technology Division of... * [87]High Speed Services for Internet Access (As of 06/30/06) 01.31.2007 We summarize here information from the fourteenth semi-annual data collection, thereby presenting a... * [88]Telephone Subscribership Report (through July 2006) 01.17.2007 This is the Federal Communications Commissions (FCCs) report on telephone subscribership in... * [89] * [90] * * [91]6 * [92]7 * [93]8 * [94]9 * 10 * [95]11 * [96]12 * [97]13 * [98]14 * * [99] * [100] Connect * [101]Facebook * [102]Twitter * [103]YouTube * [104]Flickr Share this page * Reddit * Digg * Facebook * Twitter
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/reh71896.html?page=9&fontsize=largeFont
  • its annual year-end circuit status report for U.... * [86]Trends in Telephony Service (2007) 02.01.2007 Trends in Telephone Service is published by the Industry Analysis and Technology Division of... * [87]High Speed Services for Internet Access (As of 06/30/06) 01.31.2007 We summarize here information from the fourteenth semi-annual data collection, thereby presenting a... * [88]Telephone Subscribership Report (through July 2006) 01.17.2007 This is the Federal Communications Commissions (FCCs) report on telephone subscribership in... * [89] * [90] * * [91]6 * [92]7 * [93]8 * [94]9 * 10 * [95]11 * [96]12 * [97]13 * [98]14 * * [99] * [100] Connect * [101]Facebook * [102]Twitter * [103]YouTube * [104]Flickr Share this page * Reddit * Digg * Facebook * Twitter
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/reh71896.html?page=9&fontsize=mediumFont
  • its annual year-end circuit status report for U.... * [86]Trends in Telephony Service (2007) 02.01.2007 Trends in Telephone Service is published by the Industry Analysis and Technology Division of... * [87]High Speed Services for Internet Access (As of 06/30/06) 01.31.2007 We summarize here information from the fourteenth semi-annual data collection, thereby presenting a... * [88]Telephone Subscribership Report (through July 2006) 01.17.2007 This is the Federal Communications Commissions (FCCs) report on telephone subscribership in... * [89] * [90] * * [91]6 * [92]7 * [93]8 * [94]9 * 10 * [95]11 * [96]12 * [97]13 * [98]14 * * [99] * [100] Connect * [101]Facebook * [102]Twitter * [103]YouTube * [104]Flickr Share this page * Reddit * Digg * Facebook * Twitter
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/stplan97.html?page=10
  • to Congress as required by the Orbit Act [_] Satellite Competition Reports [_] Section 257 Triennial Reports [_] Section 43.61 International Traffic Data Reports [_] Statistics of Communications Common Carrier Reports [_] Telephone Penetration Reports [_] Telephone Subscribership Reports [_] Trends in Telephony Service [_] Video Competition Reports Apply Filter * [79]Numbering Resource Utilization in the U.S. (As of 12/31/05) 01.17.2007 This is the Federal Communications Commissions report on numbering resource utilization in... * [80]Local Telephone Competition (As of 06/30/06) 01.07.2007 We present here summary statistics of the latest data on local telephone service competition in... * [81]Report on Cable Industry Prices (2005) 12.27.2006 Section 623(k) of the Communications Act, as amended by the Cable Television Consumer ... * [82]Commercial Mobile
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/stplan97.html?page=10&contrast=
  • to Congress as required by the Orbit Act [_] Satellite Competition Reports [_] Section 257 Triennial Reports [_] Section 43.61 International Traffic Data Reports [_] Statistics of Communications Common Carrier Reports [_] Telephone Penetration Reports [_] Telephone Subscribership Reports [_] Trends in Telephony Service [_] Video Competition Reports Apply Filter * [79]Numbering Resource Utilization in the U.S. (As of 12/31/05) 01.17.2007 This is the Federal Communications Commissions report on numbering resource utilization in... * [80]Local Telephone Competition (As of 06/30/06) 01.07.2007 We present here summary statistics of the latest data on local telephone service competition in... * [81]Report on Cable Industry Prices (2005) 12.27.2006 Section 623(k) of the Communications Act, as amended by the Cable Television Consumer ... * [82]Commercial Mobile
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/stplan97.html?page=10&contrast=highContrast
  • to Congress as required by the Orbit Act [_] Satellite Competition Reports [_] Section 257 Triennial Reports [_] Section 43.61 International Traffic Data Reports [_] Statistics of Communications Common Carrier Reports [_] Telephone Penetration Reports [_] Telephone Subscribership Reports [_] Trends in Telephony Service [_] Video Competition Reports Apply Filter * [79]Numbering Resource Utilization in the U.S. (As of 12/31/05) 01.17.2007 This is the Federal Communications Commissions report on numbering resource utilization in... * [80]Local Telephone Competition (As of 06/30/06) 01.07.2007 We present here summary statistics of the latest data on local telephone service competition in... * [81]Report on Cable Industry Prices (2005) 12.27.2006 Section 623(k) of the Communications Act, as amended by the Cable Television Consumer ... * [82]Commercial Mobile
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/stplan97.html?page=10&fontsize=
  • to Congress as required by the Orbit Act [_] Satellite Competition Reports [_] Section 257 Triennial Reports [_] Section 43.61 International Traffic Data Reports [_] Statistics of Communications Common Carrier Reports [_] Telephone Penetration Reports [_] Telephone Subscribership Reports [_] Trends in Telephony Service [_] Video Competition Reports Apply Filter * [79]Numbering Resource Utilization in the U.S. (As of 12/31/05) 01.17.2007 This is the Federal Communications Commissions report on numbering resource utilization in... * [80]Local Telephone Competition (As of 06/30/06) 01.07.2007 We present here summary statistics of the latest data on local telephone service competition in... * [81]Report on Cable Industry Prices (2005) 12.27.2006 Section 623(k) of the Communications Act, as amended by the Cable Television Consumer ... * [82]Commercial Mobile
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/stplan97.html?page=10&fontsize=largeFont
  • to Congress as required by the Orbit Act [_] Satellite Competition Reports [_] Section 257 Triennial Reports [_] Section 43.61 International Traffic Data Reports [_] Statistics of Communications Common Carrier Reports [_] Telephone Penetration Reports [_] Telephone Subscribership Reports [_] Trends in Telephony Service [_] Video Competition Reports Apply Filter * [79]Numbering Resource Utilization in the U.S. (As of 12/31/05) 01.17.2007 This is the Federal Communications Commissions report on numbering resource utilization in... * [80]Local Telephone Competition (As of 06/30/06) 01.07.2007 We present here summary statistics of the latest data on local telephone service competition in... * [81]Report on Cable Industry Prices (2005) 12.27.2006 Section 623(k) of the Communications Act, as amended by the Cable Television Consumer ... * [82]Commercial Mobile
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/stplan97.html?page=10&fontsize=mediumFont
  • to Congress as required by the Orbit Act [_] Satellite Competition Reports [_] Section 257 Triennial Reports [_] Section 43.61 International Traffic Data Reports [_] Statistics of Communications Common Carrier Reports [_] Telephone Penetration Reports [_] Telephone Subscribership Reports [_] Trends in Telephony Service [_] Video Competition Reports Apply Filter * [79]Numbering Resource Utilization in the U.S. (As of 12/31/05) 01.17.2007 This is the Federal Communications Commissions report on numbering resource utilization in... * [80]Local Telephone Competition (As of 06/30/06) 01.07.2007 We present here summary statistics of the latest data on local telephone service competition in... * [81]Report on Cable Industry Prices (2005) 12.27.2006 Section 623(k) of the Communications Act, as amended by the Cable Television Consumer ... * [82]Commercial Mobile
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/stplan97.html?page=18
  • 43.61 International Traffic Data Reports [_] Statistics of Communications Common Carrier Reports [_] Telephone Penetration Reports [_] Telephone Subscribership Reports [_] Trends in Telephony Service [_] Video Competition Reports Apply Filter * [79]Telephone Subscribership Report (through July 2002) 02.12.2003 This is the Federal Communications Commissions (FCCs) report on telephone subscribership in... * [80]Quarterly Inquiries and Complaints Report (1st Qtr, 2003) 01.17.2003 This report tracks the top subject areas for consumer inquiries and complaints received during the... * [81]Quality of Service Report of the Local Operating Companies (2000-2001) 01.03.2003 This report summarizes various kinds of service quality data filed by certain incumbent local... * [82]9th Annual Video Competition Report 12.31.2002 This is the Commissions ninth annual report (2002 Report) to Congress on
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/stplan97.html?page=18&contrast=
  • 43.61 International Traffic Data Reports [_] Statistics of Communications Common Carrier Reports [_] Telephone Penetration Reports [_] Telephone Subscribership Reports [_] Trends in Telephony Service [_] Video Competition Reports Apply Filter * [79]Telephone Subscribership Report (through July 2002) 02.12.2003 This is the Federal Communications Commissions (FCCs) report on telephone subscribership in... * [80]Quarterly Inquiries and Complaints Report (1st Qtr, 2003) 01.17.2003 This report tracks the top subject areas for consumer inquiries and complaints received during the... * [81]Quality of Service Report of the Local Operating Companies (2000-2001) 01.03.2003 This report summarizes various kinds of service quality data filed by certain incumbent local... * [82]9th Annual Video Competition Report 12.31.2002 This is the Commissions ninth annual report (2002 Report) to Congress on
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/stplan97.html?page=18&contrast=highContrast
  • 43.61 International Traffic Data Reports [_] Statistics of Communications Common Carrier Reports [_] Telephone Penetration Reports [_] Telephone Subscribership Reports [_] Trends in Telephony Service [_] Video Competition Reports Apply Filter * [79]Telephone Subscribership Report (through July 2002) 02.12.2003 This is the Federal Communications Commissions (FCCs) report on telephone subscribership in... * [80]Quarterly Inquiries and Complaints Report (1st Qtr, 2003) 01.17.2003 This report tracks the top subject areas for consumer inquiries and complaints received during the... * [81]Quality of Service Report of the Local Operating Companies (2000-2001) 01.03.2003 This report summarizes various kinds of service quality data filed by certain incumbent local... * [82]9th Annual Video Competition Report 12.31.2002 This is the Commissions ninth annual report (2002 Report) to Congress on
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/stplan97.html?page=18&fontsize=
  • 43.61 International Traffic Data Reports [_] Statistics of Communications Common Carrier Reports [_] Telephone Penetration Reports [_] Telephone Subscribership Reports [_] Trends in Telephony Service [_] Video Competition Reports Apply Filter * [79]Telephone Subscribership Report (through July 2002) 02.12.2003 This is the Federal Communications Commissions (FCCs) report on telephone subscribership in... * [80]Quarterly Inquiries and Complaints Report (1st Qtr, 2003) 01.17.2003 This report tracks the top subject areas for consumer inquiries and complaints received during the... * [81]Quality of Service Report of the Local Operating Companies (2000-2001) 01.03.2003 This report summarizes various kinds of service quality data filed by certain incumbent local... * [82]9th Annual Video Competition Report 12.31.2002 This is the Commissions ninth annual report (2002 Report) to Congress on
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/stplan97.html?page=18&fontsize=largeFont
  • 43.61 International Traffic Data Reports [_] Statistics of Communications Common Carrier Reports [_] Telephone Penetration Reports [_] Telephone Subscribership Reports [_] Trends in Telephony Service [_] Video Competition Reports Apply Filter * [79]Telephone Subscribership Report (through July 2002) 02.12.2003 This is the Federal Communications Commissions (FCCs) report on telephone subscribership in... * [80]Quarterly Inquiries and Complaints Report (1st Qtr, 2003) 01.17.2003 This report tracks the top subject areas for consumer inquiries and complaints received during the... * [81]Quality of Service Report of the Local Operating Companies (2000-2001) 01.03.2003 This report summarizes various kinds of service quality data filed by certain incumbent local... * [82]9th Annual Video Competition Report 12.31.2002 This is the Commissions ninth annual report (2002 Report) to Congress on
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/stplan97.html?page=18&fontsize=mediumFont
  • 43.61 International Traffic Data Reports [_] Statistics of Communications Common Carrier Reports [_] Telephone Penetration Reports [_] Telephone Subscribership Reports [_] Trends in Telephony Service [_] Video Competition Reports Apply Filter * [79]Telephone Subscribership Report (through July 2002) 02.12.2003 This is the Federal Communications Commissions (FCCs) report on telephone subscribership in... * [80]Quarterly Inquiries and Complaints Report (1st Qtr, 2003) 01.17.2003 This report tracks the top subject areas for consumer inquiries and complaints received during the... * [81]Quality of Service Report of the Local Operating Companies (2000-2001) 01.03.2003 This report summarizes various kinds of service quality data filed by certain incumbent local... * [82]9th Annual Video Competition Report 12.31.2002 This is the Commissions ninth annual report (2002 Report) to Congress on
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/stplan97.html?page=20
  • (FCCs) report on telephone subscribership in the... * [81]Third Broadband Progress Report 02.07.2002 The FCC released its third report on the availability of advanced telecommunications capability... * [82]High Speed Services for Internet Access (As of 06/30/01) 02.01.2002 We summarize here information from the fourth data collection, thereby presenting a snapshot of... * [83]Quarterly Inquiries and Complaints Report (1st Qtr, 2002) 01.17.2002 This report tracks the top subject areas for consumer inquiries and complaints received during the... * [84]8th Annual Video Competition Report 01.14.2002 This is the Commissions eighth annual report (2001 Report) to Congress on the status of ... * [85]Quality of Service Report of the Local Operating Companies (1999-2000) 12.05.2001 This report summarizes various kinds of service quality data filed
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/stplan97.html?page=20&contrast=
  • (FCCs) report on telephone subscribership in the... * [81]Third Broadband Progress Report 02.07.2002 The FCC released its third report on the availability of advanced telecommunications capability... * [82]High Speed Services for Internet Access (As of 06/30/01) 02.01.2002 We summarize here information from the fourth data collection, thereby presenting a snapshot of... * [83]Quarterly Inquiries and Complaints Report (1st Qtr, 2002) 01.17.2002 This report tracks the top subject areas for consumer inquiries and complaints received during the... * [84]8th Annual Video Competition Report 01.14.2002 This is the Commissions eighth annual report (2001 Report) to Congress on the status of ... * [85]Quality of Service Report of the Local Operating Companies (1999-2000) 12.05.2001 This report summarizes various kinds of service quality data filed
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/stplan97.html?page=20&contrast=highContrast
  • (FCCs) report on telephone subscribership in the... * [81]Third Broadband Progress Report 02.07.2002 The FCC released its third report on the availability of advanced telecommunications capability... * [82]High Speed Services for Internet Access (As of 06/30/01) 02.01.2002 We summarize here information from the fourth data collection, thereby presenting a snapshot of... * [83]Quarterly Inquiries and Complaints Report (1st Qtr, 2002) 01.17.2002 This report tracks the top subject areas for consumer inquiries and complaints received during the... * [84]8th Annual Video Competition Report 01.14.2002 This is the Commissions eighth annual report (2001 Report) to Congress on the status of ... * [85]Quality of Service Report of the Local Operating Companies (1999-2000) 12.05.2001 This report summarizes various kinds of service quality data filed
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/stplan97.html?page=20&fontsize=
  • (FCCs) report on telephone subscribership in the... * [81]Third Broadband Progress Report 02.07.2002 The FCC released its third report on the availability of advanced telecommunications capability... * [82]High Speed Services for Internet Access (As of 06/30/01) 02.01.2002 We summarize here information from the fourth data collection, thereby presenting a snapshot of... * [83]Quarterly Inquiries and Complaints Report (1st Qtr, 2002) 01.17.2002 This report tracks the top subject areas for consumer inquiries and complaints received during the... * [84]8th Annual Video Competition Report 01.14.2002 This is the Commissions eighth annual report (2001 Report) to Congress on the status of ... * [85]Quality of Service Report of the Local Operating Companies (1999-2000) 12.05.2001 This report summarizes various kinds of service quality data filed
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/stplan97.html?page=20&fontsize=largeFont
  • (FCCs) report on telephone subscribership in the... * [81]Third Broadband Progress Report 02.07.2002 The FCC released its third report on the availability of advanced telecommunications capability... * [82]High Speed Services for Internet Access (As of 06/30/01) 02.01.2002 We summarize here information from the fourth data collection, thereby presenting a snapshot of... * [83]Quarterly Inquiries and Complaints Report (1st Qtr, 2002) 01.17.2002 This report tracks the top subject areas for consumer inquiries and complaints received during the... * [84]8th Annual Video Competition Report 01.14.2002 This is the Commissions eighth annual report (2001 Report) to Congress on the status of ... * [85]Quality of Service Report of the Local Operating Companies (1999-2000) 12.05.2001 This report summarizes various kinds of service quality data filed
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/stplan97.html?page=20&fontsize=mediumFont
  • (FCCs) report on telephone subscribership in the... * [81]Third Broadband Progress Report 02.07.2002 The FCC released its third report on the availability of advanced telecommunications capability... * [82]High Speed Services for Internet Access (As of 06/30/01) 02.01.2002 We summarize here information from the fourth data collection, thereby presenting a snapshot of... * [83]Quarterly Inquiries and Complaints Report (1st Qtr, 2002) 01.17.2002 This report tracks the top subject areas for consumer inquiries and complaints received during the... * [84]8th Annual Video Competition Report 01.14.2002 This is the Commissions eighth annual report (2001 Report) to Congress on the status of ... * [85]Quality of Service Report of the Local Operating Companies (1999-2000) 12.05.2001 This report summarizes various kinds of service quality data filed
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/stplan97.html?page=4
  • 43.61 International Traffic Data Reports [_] Statistics of Communications Common Carrier Reports [_] Telephone Penetration Reports [_] Telephone Subscribership Reports [_] Trends in Telephony Service [_] Video Competition Reports Apply Filter * [79]Telephone Subscribership Report (through November 2009) 02.02.2010 This is the Federal Communications Commissions (FCCs) report on telephone subscribership in... * [80]Quarterly Inquiries and Complaints Report (1st Qtr, 2010) 01.17.2010 This report tracks the top subject areas for consumer inquiries and complaints received during the... * [81]Quality of Service Report of the Local Operating Companies (2007-2008) 12.24.2009 This report summarizes the Automated Reporting Management Information System (ARMIS) service... * [82]Telephone Subscribership Report (through July 2009) 12.15.2009 This is the Federal Communications Commissions (FCCs) report on telephone subscribership in... * [83]Quarterly
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/stplan97.html?page=4&contrast=
  • 43.61 International Traffic Data Reports [_] Statistics of Communications Common Carrier Reports [_] Telephone Penetration Reports [_] Telephone Subscribership Reports [_] Trends in Telephony Service [_] Video Competition Reports Apply Filter * [79]Telephone Subscribership Report (through November 2009) 02.02.2010 This is the Federal Communications Commissions (FCCs) report on telephone subscribership in... * [80]Quarterly Inquiries and Complaints Report (1st Qtr, 2010) 01.17.2010 This report tracks the top subject areas for consumer inquiries and complaints received during the... * [81]Quality of Service Report of the Local Operating Companies (2007-2008) 12.24.2009 This report summarizes the Automated Reporting Management Information System (ARMIS) service... * [82]Telephone Subscribership Report (through July 2009) 12.15.2009 This is the Federal Communications Commissions (FCCs) report on telephone subscribership in... * [83]Quarterly
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/stplan97.html?page=4&contrast=highContrast
  • 43.61 International Traffic Data Reports [_] Statistics of Communications Common Carrier Reports [_] Telephone Penetration Reports [_] Telephone Subscribership Reports [_] Trends in Telephony Service [_] Video Competition Reports Apply Filter * [79]Telephone Subscribership Report (through November 2009) 02.02.2010 This is the Federal Communications Commissions (FCCs) report on telephone subscribership in... * [80]Quarterly Inquiries and Complaints Report (1st Qtr, 2010) 01.17.2010 This report tracks the top subject areas for consumer inquiries and complaints received during the... * [81]Quality of Service Report of the Local Operating Companies (2007-2008) 12.24.2009 This report summarizes the Automated Reporting Management Information System (ARMIS) service... * [82]Telephone Subscribership Report (through July 2009) 12.15.2009 This is the Federal Communications Commissions (FCCs) report on telephone subscribership in... * [83]Quarterly
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/stplan97.html?page=4&fontsize=
  • 43.61 International Traffic Data Reports [_] Statistics of Communications Common Carrier Reports [_] Telephone Penetration Reports [_] Telephone Subscribership Reports [_] Trends in Telephony Service [_] Video Competition Reports Apply Filter * [79]Telephone Subscribership Report (through November 2009) 02.02.2010 This is the Federal Communications Commissions (FCCs) report on telephone subscribership in... * [80]Quarterly Inquiries and Complaints Report (1st Qtr, 2010) 01.17.2010 This report tracks the top subject areas for consumer inquiries and complaints received during the... * [81]Quality of Service Report of the Local Operating Companies (2007-2008) 12.24.2009 This report summarizes the Automated Reporting Management Information System (ARMIS) service... * [82]Telephone Subscribership Report (through July 2009) 12.15.2009 This is the Federal Communications Commissions (FCCs) report on telephone subscribership in... * [83]Quarterly
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/stplan97.html?page=4&fontsize=largeFont
  • 43.61 International Traffic Data Reports [_] Statistics of Communications Common Carrier Reports [_] Telephone Penetration Reports [_] Telephone Subscribership Reports [_] Trends in Telephony Service [_] Video Competition Reports Apply Filter * [79]Telephone Subscribership Report (through November 2009) 02.02.2010 This is the Federal Communications Commissions (FCCs) report on telephone subscribership in... * [80]Quarterly Inquiries and Complaints Report (1st Qtr, 2010) 01.17.2010 This report tracks the top subject areas for consumer inquiries and complaints received during the... * [81]Quality of Service Report of the Local Operating Companies (2007-2008) 12.24.2009 This report summarizes the Automated Reporting Management Information System (ARMIS) service... * [82]Telephone Subscribership Report (through July 2009) 12.15.2009 This is the Federal Communications Commissions (FCCs) report on telephone subscribership in... * [83]Quarterly
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/stplan97.html?page=4&fontsize=mediumFont
  • 43.61 International Traffic Data Reports [_] Statistics of Communications Common Carrier Reports [_] Telephone Penetration Reports [_] Telephone Subscribership Reports [_] Trends in Telephony Service [_] Video Competition Reports Apply Filter * [79]Telephone Subscribership Report (through November 2009) 02.02.2010 This is the Federal Communications Commissions (FCCs) report on telephone subscribership in... * [80]Quarterly Inquiries and Complaints Report (1st Qtr, 2010) 01.17.2010 This report tracks the top subject areas for consumer inquiries and complaints received during the... * [81]Quality of Service Report of the Local Operating Companies (2007-2008) 12.24.2009 This report summarizes the Automated Reporting Management Information System (ARMIS) service... * [82]Telephone Subscribership Report (through July 2009) 12.15.2009 This is the Federal Communications Commissions (FCCs) report on telephone subscribership in... * [83]Quarterly
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/stplan97.html?page=9
  • its annual year-end circuit status report for U.... * [86]Trends in Telephony Service (2007) 02.01.2007 Trends in Telephone Service is published by the Industry Analysis and Technology Division of... * [87]High Speed Services for Internet Access (As of 06/30/06) 01.31.2007 We summarize here information from the fourteenth semi-annual data collection, thereby presenting a... * [88]Telephone Subscribership Report (through July 2006) 01.17.2007 This is the Federal Communications Commissions (FCCs) report on telephone subscribership in... * [89] * [90] * * [91]6 * [92]7 * [93]8 * [94]9 * 10 * [95]11 * [96]12 * [97]13 * [98]14 * * [99] * [100] Connect * [101]Facebook * [102]Twitter * [103]YouTube * [104]Flickr Share this page * Reddit * Digg * Facebook * Twitter
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/stplan97.html?page=9&contrast=
  • its annual year-end circuit status report for U.... * [86]Trends in Telephony Service (2007) 02.01.2007 Trends in Telephone Service is published by the Industry Analysis and Technology Division of... * [87]High Speed Services for Internet Access (As of 06/30/06) 01.31.2007 We summarize here information from the fourteenth semi-annual data collection, thereby presenting a... * [88]Telephone Subscribership Report (through July 2006) 01.17.2007 This is the Federal Communications Commissions (FCCs) report on telephone subscribership in... * [89] * [90] * * [91]6 * [92]7 * [93]8 * [94]9 * 10 * [95]11 * [96]12 * [97]13 * [98]14 * * [99] * [100] Connect * [101]Facebook * [102]Twitter * [103]YouTube * [104]Flickr Share this page * Reddit * Digg * Facebook * Twitter
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/stplan97.html?page=9&contrast=highContrast
  • its annual year-end circuit status report for U.... * [86]Trends in Telephony Service (2007) 02.01.2007 Trends in Telephone Service is published by the Industry Analysis and Technology Division of... * [87]High Speed Services for Internet Access (As of 06/30/06) 01.31.2007 We summarize here information from the fourteenth semi-annual data collection, thereby presenting a... * [88]Telephone Subscribership Report (through July 2006) 01.17.2007 This is the Federal Communications Commissions (FCCs) report on telephone subscribership in... * [89] * [90] * * [91]6 * [92]7 * [93]8 * [94]9 * 10 * [95]11 * [96]12 * [97]13 * [98]14 * * [99] * [100] Connect * [101]Facebook * [102]Twitter * [103]YouTube * [104]Flickr Share this page * Reddit * Digg * Facebook * Twitter
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/stplan97.html?page=9&fontsize=
  • its annual year-end circuit status report for U.... * [86]Trends in Telephony Service (2007) 02.01.2007 Trends in Telephone Service is published by the Industry Analysis and Technology Division of... * [87]High Speed Services for Internet Access (As of 06/30/06) 01.31.2007 We summarize here information from the fourteenth semi-annual data collection, thereby presenting a... * [88]Telephone Subscribership Report (through July 2006) 01.17.2007 This is the Federal Communications Commissions (FCCs) report on telephone subscribership in... * [89] * [90] * * [91]6 * [92]7 * [93]8 * [94]9 * 10 * [95]11 * [96]12 * [97]13 * [98]14 * * [99] * [100] Connect * [101]Facebook * [102]Twitter * [103]YouTube * [104]Flickr Share this page * Reddit * Digg * Facebook * Twitter
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/stplan97.html?page=9&fontsize=largeFont
  • its annual year-end circuit status report for U.... * [86]Trends in Telephony Service (2007) 02.01.2007 Trends in Telephone Service is published by the Industry Analysis and Technology Division of... * [87]High Speed Services for Internet Access (As of 06/30/06) 01.31.2007 We summarize here information from the fourteenth semi-annual data collection, thereby presenting a... * [88]Telephone Subscribership Report (through July 2006) 01.17.2007 This is the Federal Communications Commissions (FCCs) report on telephone subscribership in... * [89] * [90] * * [91]6 * [92]7 * [93]8 * [94]9 * 10 * [95]11 * [96]12 * [97]13 * [98]14 * * [99] * [100] Connect * [101]Facebook * [102]Twitter * [103]YouTube * [104]Flickr Share this page * Reddit * Digg * Facebook * Twitter
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/stplan97.html?page=9&fontsize=mediumFont
  • its annual year-end circuit status report for U.... * [86]Trends in Telephony Service (2007) 02.01.2007 Trends in Telephone Service is published by the Industry Analysis and Technology Division of... * [87]High Speed Services for Internet Access (As of 06/30/06) 01.31.2007 We summarize here information from the fourteenth semi-annual data collection, thereby presenting a... * [88]Telephone Subscribership Report (through July 2006) 01.17.2007 This is the Federal Communications Commissions (FCCs) report on telephone subscribership in... * [89] * [90] * * [91]6 * [92]7 * [93]8 * [94]9 * 10 * [95]11 * [96]12 * [97]13 * [98]14 * * [99] * [100] Connect * [101]Facebook * [102]Twitter * [103]YouTube * [104]Flickr Share this page * Reddit * Digg * Facebook * Twitter
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/tfr_rel.html?page=10
  • to Congress as required by the Orbit Act [_] Satellite Competition Reports [_] Section 257 Triennial Reports [_] Section 43.61 International Traffic Data Reports [_] Statistics of Communications Common Carrier Reports [_] Telephone Penetration Reports [_] Telephone Subscribership Reports [_] Trends in Telephony Service [_] Video Competition Reports Apply Filter * [79]Numbering Resource Utilization in the U.S. (As of 12/31/05) 01.17.2007 This is the Federal Communications Commissions report on numbering resource utilization in... * [80]Local Telephone Competition (As of 06/30/06) 01.07.2007 We present here summary statistics of the latest data on local telephone service competition in... * [81]Report on Cable Industry Prices (2005) 12.27.2006 Section 623(k) of the Communications Act, as amended by the Cable Television Consumer ... * [82]Commercial Mobile
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/tfr_rel.html?page=10&contrast=
  • to Congress as required by the Orbit Act [_] Satellite Competition Reports [_] Section 257 Triennial Reports [_] Section 43.61 International Traffic Data Reports [_] Statistics of Communications Common Carrier Reports [_] Telephone Penetration Reports [_] Telephone Subscribership Reports [_] Trends in Telephony Service [_] Video Competition Reports Apply Filter * [79]Numbering Resource Utilization in the U.S. (As of 12/31/05) 01.17.2007 This is the Federal Communications Commissions report on numbering resource utilization in... * [80]Local Telephone Competition (As of 06/30/06) 01.07.2007 We present here summary statistics of the latest data on local telephone service competition in... * [81]Report on Cable Industry Prices (2005) 12.27.2006 Section 623(k) of the Communications Act, as amended by the Cable Television Consumer ... * [82]Commercial Mobile
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/tfr_rel.html?page=10&contrast=highContrast
  • to Congress as required by the Orbit Act [_] Satellite Competition Reports [_] Section 257 Triennial Reports [_] Section 43.61 International Traffic Data Reports [_] Statistics of Communications Common Carrier Reports [_] Telephone Penetration Reports [_] Telephone Subscribership Reports [_] Trends in Telephony Service [_] Video Competition Reports Apply Filter * [79]Numbering Resource Utilization in the U.S. (As of 12/31/05) 01.17.2007 This is the Federal Communications Commissions report on numbering resource utilization in... * [80]Local Telephone Competition (As of 06/30/06) 01.07.2007 We present here summary statistics of the latest data on local telephone service competition in... * [81]Report on Cable Industry Prices (2005) 12.27.2006 Section 623(k) of the Communications Act, as amended by the Cable Television Consumer ... * [82]Commercial Mobile
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/tfr_rel.html?page=10&fontsize=
  • to Congress as required by the Orbit Act [_] Satellite Competition Reports [_] Section 257 Triennial Reports [_] Section 43.61 International Traffic Data Reports [_] Statistics of Communications Common Carrier Reports [_] Telephone Penetration Reports [_] Telephone Subscribership Reports [_] Trends in Telephony Service [_] Video Competition Reports Apply Filter * [79]Numbering Resource Utilization in the U.S. (As of 12/31/05) 01.17.2007 This is the Federal Communications Commissions report on numbering resource utilization in... * [80]Local Telephone Competition (As of 06/30/06) 01.07.2007 We present here summary statistics of the latest data on local telephone service competition in... * [81]Report on Cable Industry Prices (2005) 12.27.2006 Section 623(k) of the Communications Act, as amended by the Cable Television Consumer ... * [82]Commercial Mobile
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/tfr_rel.html?page=10&fontsize=largeFont
  • to Congress as required by the Orbit Act [_] Satellite Competition Reports [_] Section 257 Triennial Reports [_] Section 43.61 International Traffic Data Reports [_] Statistics of Communications Common Carrier Reports [_] Telephone Penetration Reports [_] Telephone Subscribership Reports [_] Trends in Telephony Service [_] Video Competition Reports Apply Filter * [79]Numbering Resource Utilization in the U.S. (As of 12/31/05) 01.17.2007 This is the Federal Communications Commissions report on numbering resource utilization in... * [80]Local Telephone Competition (As of 06/30/06) 01.07.2007 We present here summary statistics of the latest data on local telephone service competition in... * [81]Report on Cable Industry Prices (2005) 12.27.2006 Section 623(k) of the Communications Act, as amended by the Cable Television Consumer ... * [82]Commercial Mobile
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/tfr_rel.html?page=10&fontsize=mediumFont
  • to Congress as required by the Orbit Act [_] Satellite Competition Reports [_] Section 257 Triennial Reports [_] Section 43.61 International Traffic Data Reports [_] Statistics of Communications Common Carrier Reports [_] Telephone Penetration Reports [_] Telephone Subscribership Reports [_] Trends in Telephony Service [_] Video Competition Reports Apply Filter * [79]Numbering Resource Utilization in the U.S. (As of 12/31/05) 01.17.2007 This is the Federal Communications Commissions report on numbering resource utilization in... * [80]Local Telephone Competition (As of 06/30/06) 01.07.2007 We present here summary statistics of the latest data on local telephone service competition in... * [81]Report on Cable Industry Prices (2005) 12.27.2006 Section 623(k) of the Communications Act, as amended by the Cable Television Consumer ... * [82]Commercial Mobile
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/tfr_rel.html?page=18
  • 43.61 International Traffic Data Reports [_] Statistics of Communications Common Carrier Reports [_] Telephone Penetration Reports [_] Telephone Subscribership Reports [_] Trends in Telephony Service [_] Video Competition Reports Apply Filter * [79]Telephone Subscribership Report (through July 2002) 02.12.2003 This is the Federal Communications Commissions (FCCs) report on telephone subscribership in... * [80]Quarterly Inquiries and Complaints Report (1st Qtr, 2003) 01.17.2003 This report tracks the top subject areas for consumer inquiries and complaints received during the... * [81]Quality of Service Report of the Local Operating Companies (2000-2001) 01.03.2003 This report summarizes various kinds of service quality data filed by certain incumbent local... * [82]9th Annual Video Competition Report 12.31.2002 This is the Commissions ninth annual report (2002 Report) to Congress on
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/tfr_rel.html?page=18&contrast=
  • 43.61 International Traffic Data Reports [_] Statistics of Communications Common Carrier Reports [_] Telephone Penetration Reports [_] Telephone Subscribership Reports [_] Trends in Telephony Service [_] Video Competition Reports Apply Filter * [79]Telephone Subscribership Report (through July 2002) 02.12.2003 This is the Federal Communications Commissions (FCCs) report on telephone subscribership in... * [80]Quarterly Inquiries and Complaints Report (1st Qtr, 2003) 01.17.2003 This report tracks the top subject areas for consumer inquiries and complaints received during the... * [81]Quality of Service Report of the Local Operating Companies (2000-2001) 01.03.2003 This report summarizes various kinds of service quality data filed by certain incumbent local... * [82]9th Annual Video Competition Report 12.31.2002 This is the Commissions ninth annual report (2002 Report) to Congress on
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/tfr_rel.html?page=18&contrast=highContrast
  • 43.61 International Traffic Data Reports [_] Statistics of Communications Common Carrier Reports [_] Telephone Penetration Reports [_] Telephone Subscribership Reports [_] Trends in Telephony Service [_] Video Competition Reports Apply Filter * [79]Telephone Subscribership Report (through July 2002) 02.12.2003 This is the Federal Communications Commissions (FCCs) report on telephone subscribership in... * [80]Quarterly Inquiries and Complaints Report (1st Qtr, 2003) 01.17.2003 This report tracks the top subject areas for consumer inquiries and complaints received during the... * [81]Quality of Service Report of the Local Operating Companies (2000-2001) 01.03.2003 This report summarizes various kinds of service quality data filed by certain incumbent local... * [82]9th Annual Video Competition Report 12.31.2002 This is the Commissions ninth annual report (2002 Report) to Congress on
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/tfr_rel.html?page=18&fontsize=
  • 43.61 International Traffic Data Reports [_] Statistics of Communications Common Carrier Reports [_] Telephone Penetration Reports [_] Telephone Subscribership Reports [_] Trends in Telephony Service [_] Video Competition Reports Apply Filter * [79]Telephone Subscribership Report (through July 2002) 02.12.2003 This is the Federal Communications Commissions (FCCs) report on telephone subscribership in... * [80]Quarterly Inquiries and Complaints Report (1st Qtr, 2003) 01.17.2003 This report tracks the top subject areas for consumer inquiries and complaints received during the... * [81]Quality of Service Report of the Local Operating Companies (2000-2001) 01.03.2003 This report summarizes various kinds of service quality data filed by certain incumbent local... * [82]9th Annual Video Competition Report 12.31.2002 This is the Commissions ninth annual report (2002 Report) to Congress on
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/tfr_rel.html?page=18&fontsize=largeFont
  • 43.61 International Traffic Data Reports [_] Statistics of Communications Common Carrier Reports [_] Telephone Penetration Reports [_] Telephone Subscribership Reports [_] Trends in Telephony Service [_] Video Competition Reports Apply Filter * [79]Telephone Subscribership Report (through July 2002) 02.12.2003 This is the Federal Communications Commissions (FCCs) report on telephone subscribership in... * [80]Quarterly Inquiries and Complaints Report (1st Qtr, 2003) 01.17.2003 This report tracks the top subject areas for consumer inquiries and complaints received during the... * [81]Quality of Service Report of the Local Operating Companies (2000-2001) 01.03.2003 This report summarizes various kinds of service quality data filed by certain incumbent local... * [82]9th Annual Video Competition Report 12.31.2002 This is the Commissions ninth annual report (2002 Report) to Congress on
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/tfr_rel.html?page=18&fontsize=mediumFont
  • 43.61 International Traffic Data Reports [_] Statistics of Communications Common Carrier Reports [_] Telephone Penetration Reports [_] Telephone Subscribership Reports [_] Trends in Telephony Service [_] Video Competition Reports Apply Filter * [79]Telephone Subscribership Report (through July 2002) 02.12.2003 This is the Federal Communications Commissions (FCCs) report on telephone subscribership in... * [80]Quarterly Inquiries and Complaints Report (1st Qtr, 2003) 01.17.2003 This report tracks the top subject areas for consumer inquiries and complaints received during the... * [81]Quality of Service Report of the Local Operating Companies (2000-2001) 01.03.2003 This report summarizes various kinds of service quality data filed by certain incumbent local... * [82]9th Annual Video Competition Report 12.31.2002 This is the Commissions ninth annual report (2002 Report) to Congress on
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/tfr_rel.html?page=20
  • (FCCs) report on telephone subscribership in the... * [81]Third Broadband Progress Report 02.07.2002 The FCC released its third report on the availability of advanced telecommunications capability... * [82]High Speed Services for Internet Access (As of 06/30/01) 02.01.2002 We summarize here information from the fourth data collection, thereby presenting a snapshot of... * [83]Quarterly Inquiries and Complaints Report (1st Qtr, 2002) 01.17.2002 This report tracks the top subject areas for consumer inquiries and complaints received during the... * [84]8th Annual Video Competition Report 01.14.2002 This is the Commissions eighth annual report (2001 Report) to Congress on the status of ... * [85]Quality of Service Report of the Local Operating Companies (1999-2000) 12.05.2001 This report summarizes various kinds of service quality data filed
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/tfr_rel.html?page=20&contrast=
  • (FCCs) report on telephone subscribership in the... * [81]Third Broadband Progress Report 02.07.2002 The FCC released its third report on the availability of advanced telecommunications capability... * [82]High Speed Services for Internet Access (As of 06/30/01) 02.01.2002 We summarize here information from the fourth data collection, thereby presenting a snapshot of... * [83]Quarterly Inquiries and Complaints Report (1st Qtr, 2002) 01.17.2002 This report tracks the top subject areas for consumer inquiries and complaints received during the... * [84]8th Annual Video Competition Report 01.14.2002 This is the Commissions eighth annual report (2001 Report) to Congress on the status of ... * [85]Quality of Service Report of the Local Operating Companies (1999-2000) 12.05.2001 This report summarizes various kinds of service quality data filed
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/tfr_rel.html?page=20&contrast=highContrast
  • (FCCs) report on telephone subscribership in the... * [81]Third Broadband Progress Report 02.07.2002 The FCC released its third report on the availability of advanced telecommunications capability... * [82]High Speed Services for Internet Access (As of 06/30/01) 02.01.2002 We summarize here information from the fourth data collection, thereby presenting a snapshot of... * [83]Quarterly Inquiries and Complaints Report (1st Qtr, 2002) 01.17.2002 This report tracks the top subject areas for consumer inquiries and complaints received during the... * [84]8th Annual Video Competition Report 01.14.2002 This is the Commissions eighth annual report (2001 Report) to Congress on the status of ... * [85]Quality of Service Report of the Local Operating Companies (1999-2000) 12.05.2001 This report summarizes various kinds of service quality data filed
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/tfr_rel.html?page=20&fontsize=
  • (FCCs) report on telephone subscribership in the... * [81]Third Broadband Progress Report 02.07.2002 The FCC released its third report on the availability of advanced telecommunications capability... * [82]High Speed Services for Internet Access (As of 06/30/01) 02.01.2002 We summarize here information from the fourth data collection, thereby presenting a snapshot of... * [83]Quarterly Inquiries and Complaints Report (1st Qtr, 2002) 01.17.2002 This report tracks the top subject areas for consumer inquiries and complaints received during the... * [84]8th Annual Video Competition Report 01.14.2002 This is the Commissions eighth annual report (2001 Report) to Congress on the status of ... * [85]Quality of Service Report of the Local Operating Companies (1999-2000) 12.05.2001 This report summarizes various kinds of service quality data filed
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/tfr_rel.html?page=20&fontsize=largeFont
  • (FCCs) report on telephone subscribership in the... * [81]Third Broadband Progress Report 02.07.2002 The FCC released its third report on the availability of advanced telecommunications capability... * [82]High Speed Services for Internet Access (As of 06/30/01) 02.01.2002 We summarize here information from the fourth data collection, thereby presenting a snapshot of... * [83]Quarterly Inquiries and Complaints Report (1st Qtr, 2002) 01.17.2002 This report tracks the top subject areas for consumer inquiries and complaints received during the... * [84]8th Annual Video Competition Report 01.14.2002 This is the Commissions eighth annual report (2001 Report) to Congress on the status of ... * [85]Quality of Service Report of the Local Operating Companies (1999-2000) 12.05.2001 This report summarizes various kinds of service quality data filed
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/tfr_rel.html?page=20&fontsize=mediumFont
  • (FCCs) report on telephone subscribership in the... * [81]Third Broadband Progress Report 02.07.2002 The FCC released its third report on the availability of advanced telecommunications capability... * [82]High Speed Services for Internet Access (As of 06/30/01) 02.01.2002 We summarize here information from the fourth data collection, thereby presenting a snapshot of... * [83]Quarterly Inquiries and Complaints Report (1st Qtr, 2002) 01.17.2002 This report tracks the top subject areas for consumer inquiries and complaints received during the... * [84]8th Annual Video Competition Report 01.14.2002 This is the Commissions eighth annual report (2001 Report) to Congress on the status of ... * [85]Quality of Service Report of the Local Operating Companies (1999-2000) 12.05.2001 This report summarizes various kinds of service quality data filed
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/tfr_rel.html?page=4
  • 43.61 International Traffic Data Reports [_] Statistics of Communications Common Carrier Reports [_] Telephone Penetration Reports [_] Telephone Subscribership Reports [_] Trends in Telephony Service [_] Video Competition Reports Apply Filter * [79]Telephone Subscribership Report (through November 2009) 02.02.2010 This is the Federal Communications Commissions (FCCs) report on telephone subscribership in... * [80]Quarterly Inquiries and Complaints Report (1st Qtr, 2010) 01.17.2010 This report tracks the top subject areas for consumer inquiries and complaints received during the... * [81]Quality of Service Report of the Local Operating Companies (2007-2008) 12.24.2009 This report summarizes the Automated Reporting Management Information System (ARMIS) service... * [82]Telephone Subscribership Report (through July 2009) 12.15.2009 This is the Federal Communications Commissions (FCCs) report on telephone subscribership in... * [83]Quarterly
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/tfr_rel.html?page=4&contrast=
  • 43.61 International Traffic Data Reports [_] Statistics of Communications Common Carrier Reports [_] Telephone Penetration Reports [_] Telephone Subscribership Reports [_] Trends in Telephony Service [_] Video Competition Reports Apply Filter * [79]Telephone Subscribership Report (through November 2009) 02.02.2010 This is the Federal Communications Commissions (FCCs) report on telephone subscribership in... * [80]Quarterly Inquiries and Complaints Report (1st Qtr, 2010) 01.17.2010 This report tracks the top subject areas for consumer inquiries and complaints received during the... * [81]Quality of Service Report of the Local Operating Companies (2007-2008) 12.24.2009 This report summarizes the Automated Reporting Management Information System (ARMIS) service... * [82]Telephone Subscribership Report (through July 2009) 12.15.2009 This is the Federal Communications Commissions (FCCs) report on telephone subscribership in... * [83]Quarterly
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/tfr_rel.html?page=4&contrast=highContrast
  • 43.61 International Traffic Data Reports [_] Statistics of Communications Common Carrier Reports [_] Telephone Penetration Reports [_] Telephone Subscribership Reports [_] Trends in Telephony Service [_] Video Competition Reports Apply Filter * [79]Telephone Subscribership Report (through November 2009) 02.02.2010 This is the Federal Communications Commissions (FCCs) report on telephone subscribership in... * [80]Quarterly Inquiries and Complaints Report (1st Qtr, 2010) 01.17.2010 This report tracks the top subject areas for consumer inquiries and complaints received during the... * [81]Quality of Service Report of the Local Operating Companies (2007-2008) 12.24.2009 This report summarizes the Automated Reporting Management Information System (ARMIS) service... * [82]Telephone Subscribership Report (through July 2009) 12.15.2009 This is the Federal Communications Commissions (FCCs) report on telephone subscribership in... * [83]Quarterly
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/tfr_rel.html?page=4&fontsize=
  • 43.61 International Traffic Data Reports [_] Statistics of Communications Common Carrier Reports [_] Telephone Penetration Reports [_] Telephone Subscribership Reports [_] Trends in Telephony Service [_] Video Competition Reports Apply Filter * [79]Telephone Subscribership Report (through November 2009) 02.02.2010 This is the Federal Communications Commissions (FCCs) report on telephone subscribership in... * [80]Quarterly Inquiries and Complaints Report (1st Qtr, 2010) 01.17.2010 This report tracks the top subject areas for consumer inquiries and complaints received during the... * [81]Quality of Service Report of the Local Operating Companies (2007-2008) 12.24.2009 This report summarizes the Automated Reporting Management Information System (ARMIS) service... * [82]Telephone Subscribership Report (through July 2009) 12.15.2009 This is the Federal Communications Commissions (FCCs) report on telephone subscribership in... * [83]Quarterly
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/tfr_rel.html?page=4&fontsize=largeFont
  • 43.61 International Traffic Data Reports [_] Statistics of Communications Common Carrier Reports [_] Telephone Penetration Reports [_] Telephone Subscribership Reports [_] Trends in Telephony Service [_] Video Competition Reports Apply Filter * [79]Telephone Subscribership Report (through November 2009) 02.02.2010 This is the Federal Communications Commissions (FCCs) report on telephone subscribership in... * [80]Quarterly Inquiries and Complaints Report (1st Qtr, 2010) 01.17.2010 This report tracks the top subject areas for consumer inquiries and complaints received during the... * [81]Quality of Service Report of the Local Operating Companies (2007-2008) 12.24.2009 This report summarizes the Automated Reporting Management Information System (ARMIS) service... * [82]Telephone Subscribership Report (through July 2009) 12.15.2009 This is the Federal Communications Commissions (FCCs) report on telephone subscribership in... * [83]Quarterly
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/tfr_rel.html?page=4&fontsize=mediumFont
  • 43.61 International Traffic Data Reports [_] Statistics of Communications Common Carrier Reports [_] Telephone Penetration Reports [_] Telephone Subscribership Reports [_] Trends in Telephony Service [_] Video Competition Reports Apply Filter * [79]Telephone Subscribership Report (through November 2009) 02.02.2010 This is the Federal Communications Commissions (FCCs) report on telephone subscribership in... * [80]Quarterly Inquiries and Complaints Report (1st Qtr, 2010) 01.17.2010 This report tracks the top subject areas for consumer inquiries and complaints received during the... * [81]Quality of Service Report of the Local Operating Companies (2007-2008) 12.24.2009 This report summarizes the Automated Reporting Management Information System (ARMIS) service... * [82]Telephone Subscribership Report (through July 2009) 12.15.2009 This is the Federal Communications Commissions (FCCs) report on telephone subscribership in... * [83]Quarterly
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/tfr_rel.html?page=9
  • its annual year-end circuit status report for U.... * [86]Trends in Telephony Service (2007) 02.01.2007 Trends in Telephone Service is published by the Industry Analysis and Technology Division of... * [87]High Speed Services for Internet Access (As of 06/30/06) 01.31.2007 We summarize here information from the fourteenth semi-annual data collection, thereby presenting a... * [88]Telephone Subscribership Report (through July 2006) 01.17.2007 This is the Federal Communications Commissions (FCCs) report on telephone subscribership in... * [89] * [90] * * [91]6 * [92]7 * [93]8 * [94]9 * 10 * [95]11 * [96]12 * [97]13 * [98]14 * * [99] * [100] Connect * [101]Facebook * [102]Twitter * [103]YouTube * [104]Flickr Share this page * Reddit * Digg * Facebook * Twitter
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/tfr_rel.html?page=9&contrast=
  • its annual year-end circuit status report for U.... * [86]Trends in Telephony Service (2007) 02.01.2007 Trends in Telephone Service is published by the Industry Analysis and Technology Division of... * [87]High Speed Services for Internet Access (As of 06/30/06) 01.31.2007 We summarize here information from the fourteenth semi-annual data collection, thereby presenting a... * [88]Telephone Subscribership Report (through July 2006) 01.17.2007 This is the Federal Communications Commissions (FCCs) report on telephone subscribership in... * [89] * [90] * * [91]6 * [92]7 * [93]8 * [94]9 * 10 * [95]11 * [96]12 * [97]13 * [98]14 * * [99] * [100] Connect * [101]Facebook * [102]Twitter * [103]YouTube * [104]Flickr Share this page * Reddit * Digg * Facebook * Twitter
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/tfr_rel.html?page=9&contrast=highContrast
  • its annual year-end circuit status report for U.... * [86]Trends in Telephony Service (2007) 02.01.2007 Trends in Telephone Service is published by the Industry Analysis and Technology Division of... * [87]High Speed Services for Internet Access (As of 06/30/06) 01.31.2007 We summarize here information from the fourteenth semi-annual data collection, thereby presenting a... * [88]Telephone Subscribership Report (through July 2006) 01.17.2007 This is the Federal Communications Commissions (FCCs) report on telephone subscribership in... * [89] * [90] * * [91]6 * [92]7 * [93]8 * [94]9 * 10 * [95]11 * [96]12 * [97]13 * [98]14 * * [99] * [100] Connect * [101]Facebook * [102]Twitter * [103]YouTube * [104]Flickr Share this page * Reddit * Digg * Facebook * Twitter
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/tfr_rel.html?page=9&fontsize=
  • its annual year-end circuit status report for U.... * [86]Trends in Telephony Service (2007) 02.01.2007 Trends in Telephone Service is published by the Industry Analysis and Technology Division of... * [87]High Speed Services for Internet Access (As of 06/30/06) 01.31.2007 We summarize here information from the fourteenth semi-annual data collection, thereby presenting a... * [88]Telephone Subscribership Report (through July 2006) 01.17.2007 This is the Federal Communications Commissions (FCCs) report on telephone subscribership in... * [89] * [90] * * [91]6 * [92]7 * [93]8 * [94]9 * 10 * [95]11 * [96]12 * [97]13 * [98]14 * * [99] * [100] Connect * [101]Facebook * [102]Twitter * [103]YouTube * [104]Flickr Share this page * Reddit * Digg * Facebook * Twitter
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/tfr_rel.html?page=9&fontsize=largeFont
  • its annual year-end circuit status report for U.... * [86]Trends in Telephony Service (2007) 02.01.2007 Trends in Telephone Service is published by the Industry Analysis and Technology Division of... * [87]High Speed Services for Internet Access (As of 06/30/06) 01.31.2007 We summarize here information from the fourteenth semi-annual data collection, thereby presenting a... * [88]Telephone Subscribership Report (through July 2006) 01.17.2007 This is the Federal Communications Commissions (FCCs) report on telephone subscribership in... * [89] * [90] * * [91]6 * [92]7 * [93]8 * [94]9 * 10 * [95]11 * [96]12 * [97]13 * [98]14 * * [99] * [100] Connect * [101]Facebook * [102]Twitter * [103]YouTube * [104]Flickr Share this page * Reddit * Digg * Facebook * Twitter
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/tfr_rel.html?page=9&fontsize=mediumFont
  • its annual year-end circuit status report for U.... * [86]Trends in Telephony Service (2007) 02.01.2007 Trends in Telephone Service is published by the Industry Analysis and Technology Division of... * [87]High Speed Services for Internet Access (As of 06/30/06) 01.31.2007 We summarize here information from the fourteenth semi-annual data collection, thereby presenting a... * [88]Telephone Subscribership Report (through July 2006) 01.17.2007 This is the Federal Communications Commissions (FCCs) report on telephone subscribership in... * [89] * [90] * * [91]6 * [92]7 * [93]8 * [94]9 * 10 * [95]11 * [96]12 * [97]13 * [98]14 * * [99] * [100] Connect * [101]Facebook * [102]Twitter * [103]YouTube * [104]Flickr Share this page * Reddit * Digg * Facebook * Twitter
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/AmateurActions/files/Diaz-09_10_19_5117.html http://www.fcc.gov/eb/AmateurActions/files/Diaz-09_10_19_5117.pdf
  • Juan Field Office South Central Regional Director The Commission sent you a second letter on August 17, 2009, notifying you that you had failed to respond to the Commission's initial letter of inquiry and directing you to respond to this office within 14 days of receipt of that second letter. See 18 U.S.C. S: 1001; see also 47 C.F.R. S: 1.17. References 1. http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/AmateurActions/files/Diaz-09_10_19_5117.pdf
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/AmateurActions/files/couns09_08_21_5112.html http://www.fcc.gov/eb/AmateurActions/files/couns09_08_21_5112.pdf
  • material fact with respect to your original application incorrectly stating that you were a "former holder" of the call sign in question. Please call me at (717) 338-2577 if you have any questions about this matter. Sincerely, Laura L. Smith Special Counsel Cc: Dallas Field Office South Central Regional Director See 18 U.S.C. S: 1001; see also 47 C.F.R. S: 1.17. References 1. http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/AmateurActions/files/couns09_08_21_5112.pdf
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/AmateurActions/files/flowe09_10_19_5134.html http://www.fcc.gov/eb/AmateurActions/files/flowe09_10_19_5134.pdf
  • material fact with respect to your original application incorrectly stating that you were a "former holder" of the call sign in question. Please call me at (717) 338-2577 if you have any questions about this matter. Sincerely, Laura L. Smith Special Counsel Cc: Norfolk Field Office South Central Regional Director See 18 U.S.C. S: 1001; see also 47 C.F.R. S: 1.17. References 1. http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/AmateurActions/files/flowe09_10_19_5134.pdf
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/AmateurActions/files/lopez09_08_21_5113.html http://www.fcc.gov/eb/AmateurActions/files/lopez09_08_21_5113.pdf
  • fact with respect to your original application incorrectly stating that you were a "former holder" of the call sign in question. Please call me at (717) 338-2577 if you have any questions about this matter. Sincerely, Laura L. Smith Special Counsel Cc: San Juan Field Office South Central Regional Director See 18 U.S.C. S: 1001; see also 47 C.F.R. S: 1.17. References 1. http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/AmateurActions/files/lopez09_08_21_5113.pdf
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/AmateurActions/files/stock09_08_21_5114.html http://www.fcc.gov/eb/AmateurActions/files/stock09_08_21_5114.pdf
  • a material fact with respect to your original application incorrectly stating that you were a "former holder" of the call sign in question. Please call me at (717) 338-2577 if you have any questions about this matter. Sincerely, Laura L. Smith Special Counsel Cc: Portland Field Office Western Regional Director See 18 U.S.C. S: 1001; see also 47 C.F.R. S: 1.17. References 1. http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/AmateurActions/files/stock09_08_21_5114.pdf
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-253702A1.html
  • license should be revoked, or to any other matter within the jurisdiction of the Commission, or, in the case of a proceeding to amend the FM or Television Table of Allotments, require from any person filing an expression of interest, written statements of fact relevant to that allotment proceeding. Any such statements of fact are subject to the provisions of 1.17 of this chapter. Paulino Bernal failed to provide a written response to the Letter of Inquiry as required pursuant to this section. 2)b. 47 U.S.C. 308(b): ``The Commission, at any time after the filing of such original application and during the term of any such licenses, may require from an applicant or licensee further written statements of fact to enable
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-255044A1.html
  • license should be revoked, or to any other matter within the jurisdiction of the Commission, or, in the case of a proceeding to amend the FM or Television Table of Allotments, require from any person filing an expression of interest, written statements of fact relevant to that allotment proceeding. Any such statements of fact are subject to the provisions of 1.17 of this chapter. Paulino Bernal Evangelism failed to provide a written response to the Letter of Inquiry as required pursuant to this section. 2)b. 47 U.S.C. 308(b): ``The Commission, at any time after the filing of such original application and during the term of any such licenses, may require from an applicant or licensee further written statements of fact to
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-255045A1.html
  • license should be revoked, or to any other matter within the jurisdiction of the Commission, or, in the case of a proceeding to amend the FM or Television Table of Allotments, require from any person filing an expression of interest, written statements of fact relevant to that allotment proceeding. Any such statements of fact are subject to the provisions of 1.17 of this chapter.'' La Radio Cristiana Network, Inc. failed to provide a written response to the Letter of Inquiry as required pursuant to this section. 2)b. 47 U.S.C. 308(b): ``. . . The Commission, at any time after the filing of such original application and during the term of any such licenses, may require from an applicant or licensee further
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-255046A1.html
  • license should be revoked, or to any other matter within the jurisdiction of the Commission, or, in the case of a proceeding to amend the FM or Television Table of Allotments, require from any person filing an expression of interest, written statements of fact relevant to that allotment proceeding. Any such statements of fact are subject to the provisions of 1.17 of this chapter.'' Paulino Bernal Evangelism failed to provide a written response to the Letter of Inquiry as required pursuant to this section. 2)b. 47 U.S.C. 308(b): ``. . . The Commission, at any time after the filing of such original application and during the term of any such licenses, may require from an applicant or licensee further written statements
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-255047A1.html
  • license should be revoked, or to any other matter within the jurisdiction of the Commission, or, in the case of a proceeding to amend the FM or Television Table of Allotments, require from any person filing an expression of interest, written statements of fact relevant to that allotment proceeding. Any such statements of fact are subject to the provisions of 1.17 of this chapter.'' Unique Broadcasting, L.L.C. failed to provide a written response to the Letter of Inquiry as required pursuant to this section. 2)b. 47 U.S.C. 308(b): ``. . . The Commission, at any time after the filing of such original application and during the term of any such licenses, may require from an applicant or licensee further written statements
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-255240A1.html
  • license should be revoked, or to any other matter within the jurisdiction of the Commission, or, in the case of a proceeding to amend the FM or Television Table of Allotments, require from any person filing an expression of interest, written statements of fact relevant to that allotment proceeding. Any such statements of fact are subject to the provisions of 1.17 of this chapter.'' Paulino Bernal failed to provide a written response to the Letter of Inquiry as required pursuant to this section. 2)b. 47 U.S.C. 308(b): ``. . . The Commission, at any time after the filing of such original application and during the term of any such licenses, may require from an applicant or licensee further written statements of
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-260117A1.html
  • financial status. Any claim of inability to pay must specifically identify the basis for the claim by reference to the financial documentation submitted. 1.16. Requests for payment of the full amount of this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture under an installment plan should be sent to: Chief, Revenue and Receivable Operation Group, 445 12th Street, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20554.14 1.17. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT this NOTICE OF APPARENT LIABILITY shall be sent, by Certified Mail, Return Receipt Requested to Farmworkers Educational Radio Network Inc. at its address of record. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION William R. Zears, Jr. District Director San Diego Office Western Region Enforcement Bureau _________________________ 147 C.F.R. 11.35. 247 U.S.C. 503(b). 3Section 312(f)(1) of the Act, 47 U.S.C.
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-260415A1.html
  • of Cingular. All replies and documentation sent in response to this Notice should be marked with the File No. and NOV No. specified above, and mailed to the following address: Federal Communications Commission Seattle Office 11410 NE 122nd Way, Suite 312 Kirkland, WA 98034 4. Additionally, pursuant to Section 403 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended,3 and Section 1.17 of the Commission's Rules,4 provide a complete explanation to the following questions along with the requested information and any relevant documents: 4.a. What is the make, model and manufacturer of the equipment located at 725 SE Everett Mall Way, Everett, Washington and what caused the equipment at this location to produce the interference? 4.b. Pursuant to what authority does Cingular
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-262766A1.html
  • to severe penalties, including, but not limited to, substantial monetary fines, in rem arrest action against the offending radio equipment, and criminal sanctions including imprisonment. (see 47 U.S.C. 401, 501, 503 and 510). UNLICENSED OPERATION OF THESE RADIO STATIONS MUST BE DISCONTINUED IMMEDIATELY. Inquiry Pursuant to Sections 308(b) and 403 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended,2 and Sections 1.17 the FCC's Rules,3 Broadband is directed to provide a complete explanation to the following questions along with the requested information and any relevant documents: 1. When did Broadband begin operating the wireless cable system in Mamora, New Jersey? What is the current status of operations of the wireless cable system in Mamora, New Jersey? 2. Does Broadband have authorization to
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-282148A1.html
  • determine what, if any, enforcement action is required to ensure compliance. Any false statement made knowingly and willfully in reply to this Notice is punishable by fine or imprisonment under Title 18 of the U.S. Code. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Thomas N. Van Stavern District Director San Francisco District Office Western Region Enforcement Bureau 47 C.F.R. S: 1.89. 47 C.F.R. S: 1.17. 47 U.S.C. S: 403. P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. S: 552a(e)(3). 18 U.S.C. S: 1001 et seq. Federal Communications Commission 2 Federal Communications Commission References 1. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-282148A1.pdf 2. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-282148A1.doc
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-282596A1.html
  • commission or omission is continuous, for more than one day." 47 U.S.C. S: 302a(b). 47 C.F.R. S: 2.803(a)(1). 47 C.F.R. S: 15.3. 47 C.F.R. S: 15.201(b). 47 C.F.R. S: 2.907(a). 12 FCC Rcd 17087 (1997), recon. denied, 15 FCC Rcd 303 (1999); 47 C.F.R. S:1.80. 47 U.S.C. S: 503(b)(2)(E). 18 U.S.C. S:S: 1001 et seq; see also 47 C.F.R. S: 1.17. 47 U.S.C. S:S: 302a(b), 503(b), 47 C.F.R. S:S: 0.111, 0.311, 0.314, 1.80, 2.803(a)(1). 47 U.S.C. S: 403. See 47 C.F.R. S: 1.1914. (...continued from previous page) (continued....) Federal Communications Commission 2 Federal Communications Commission References 1. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-282596A1.pdf 2. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-282596A1.doc
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-283331A1.html
  • determine what, if any, enforcement action is required to ensure compliance. Any false statement made knowingly and willfully in reply to this Notice is punishable by fine or imprisonment under Title 18 of the U.S. Code. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Thomas N. Van Stavern District Director San Francisco District Office Western Region Enforcement Bureau 47 C.F.R. S: 1.89. 47 C.F.R. S: 1.17. 47 U.S.C. S: 403. P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. S: 552a(e)(3). 18 U.S.C. S: 1001 et seq. Federal Communications Commission 2 Federal Communications Commission References 1. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-283331A1.pdf 2. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-283331A1.doc
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-283332A1.html
  • reply, to determine what, if any, enforcement action is required to ensure compliance. Any false statement made knowingly and willfully in reply to this Notice is punishable by fine or imprisonment under Title 18 of the U.S. Code. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Thomas N. VanStavern District Director San Francisco Office Western Region Enforcement Bureau 47 C.F.R. S: 1.89. 47 C.F.R. S: 1.17. 47 U.S.C. S: 403. P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. S: 552a(e)(3). 18 U.S.C. S: 1001 et seq. Federal Communications Commission 3 Federal Communications Commission References 1. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-283332A1.pdf 2. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-283332A1.doc
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-283656A1.html
  • to determine what, if any, enforcement action is required to ensure compliance. Any false statement made knowingly and willfully in reply to this Notice is punishable by fine or imprisonment under Title 18 of the U.S. Code. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION James D. Wells District Director Dallas District Office South Central Region Enforcement Bureau 47 C.F.R. S: 1.89. 47 C.F.R. S: 1.17. 47 U.S.C. S: 308(b). P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. S: 552a(e)(3). 18 U.S.C. S: 1001 et seq. Federal Communications Commission 2 Federal Communications Commission References 1. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-283656A1.pdf 2. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-283656A1.doc
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-286436A1.html
  • determine what, if any, enforcement action is required to ensure compliance. Any false statement made knowingly and willfully in reply to this Notice is punishable by fine or imprisonment under Title 18 of the U.S. Code. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Thomas N. Van Stavern District Director San Francisco District Office Western Region Enforcement Bureau 47 C.F.R. S: 1.89. 47 C.F.R. S: 1.17. 47 U.S.C. S: 403. P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. S: 552a(e)(3). 18 U.S.C. S: 1001 et seq. Federal Communications Commission 2 Federal Communications Commission References 1. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-286436A1.pdf 2. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-286436A1.doc
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-286437A1.html
  • determine what, if any, enforcement action is required to ensure compliance. Any false statement made knowingly and willfully in reply to this Notice is punishable by fine or imprisonment under Title 18 of the U.S. Code. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Thomas N. Van Stavern District Director San Francisco District Office Western Region Enforcement Bureau 47 C.F.R. S: 1.89. 47 C.F.R. S: 1.17. 47 U.S.C. S: 403. P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. S: 552a(e)(3). 18 U.S.C. S: 1001 et seq. Federal Communications Commission 2 Federal Communications Commission References 1. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-286437A1.pdf 2. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-286437A1.doc
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-286913A1.html
  • determine what, if any, enforcement action is required to ensure compliance. Any false statement made knowingly and willfully in reply to this Notice is punishable by fine or imprisonment under Title 18 of the U.S. Code. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Margaret Egler Acting Interim District Director Los Angeles District Office Western Region Enforcement Bureau 47 C.F.R. S: 1.89. 47 C.F.R. S: 1.17. 47 U.S.C. S: 403. P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. S: 552a(e)(3). 18 U.S.C. S: 1001 et seq. Federal Communications Commission 2 Federal Communications Commission References 1. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-286913A1.pdf 2. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-286913A1.doc
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-289670A1.html
  • the operator to severe penalties, including, but not limited to, substantial monetary fines, in rem arrest action against the offending radio equipment, and criminal sanctions including imprisonment. (see 47 U.S.C. S:S: 401, 501, 503 and 510). UNLICENSED OPERATION OF THIS RADIO STATION MUST BE DISCONTINUED IMMEDIATELY. Pursuant to Section 403 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, and Sections 1.17 the FCC's Rules, Distrigas is directed to provide the following information and any relevant documents: 1. Any evidence that you have authority granted by the FCC to operate a telemetry base station on 465.075 MHz in Everett, MA. 2. During the inspection of your radio system, agents observed that the transmitter was not identified with an assigned FCC ID number,
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-295454A1.html
  • shall be subscribed by the declarant as true under penalty of perjury, and dated, in substantially the following form . . . : `I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on (date). (Signature)'." 47 C.F.R. S: 1.16. 18 U.S.C. S: 1001 et seq. See also 47 C.F.R. S: 1.17. P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. S: 552a(e)(3). Federal Communications Commission 3 Federal Communications Commission References 1. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295454A1.pdf 2. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295454A1.doc
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-295455A1.html
  • shall be subscribed by the declarant as true under penalty of perjury, and dated, in substantially the following form . . . : `I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on (date). (Signature)'." 47 C.F.R. S: 1.16. 18 U.S.C. S: 1001 et seq. See also 47 C.F.R. S: 1.17. P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. S: 552a(e)(3). Federal Communications Commission 3 Federal Communications Commission References 1. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295455A1.pdf 2. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295455A1.doc
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-295456A1.html
  • shall be subscribed by the declarant as true under penalty of perjury, and dated, in substantially the following form . . . : `I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on (date). (Signature)'." 47 C.F.R. S: 1.16. 18 U.S.C. S: 1001 et seq. See also 47 C.F.R. S: 1.17. P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. S: 552a(e)(3). Federal Communications Commission 3 Federal Communications Commission References 1. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295456A1.pdf 2. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295456A1.doc
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-295457A1.html
  • shall be subscribed by the declarant as true under penalty of perjury, and dated, in substantially the following form . . . : `I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on (date). (Signature)'." 47 C.F.R. S: 1.16. 18 U.S.C. S: 1001 et seq. See also 47 C.F.R. S: 1.17. P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. S: 552a(e)(3). Federal Communications Commission 3 Federal Communications Commission References 1. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295457A1.pdf 2. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295457A1.doc
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-295458A1.html
  • shall be subscribed by the declarant as true under penalty of perjury, and dated, in substantially the following form . . . : `I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on (date). (Signature)'." 47 C.F.R. S: 1.16. 18 U.S.C. S: 1001 et seq. See also 47 C.F.R. S: 1.17. P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. S: 552a(e)(3). Federal Communications Commission 3 Federal Communications Commission References 1. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295458A1.pdf 2. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295458A1.doc
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-295595A1.html
  • shall be subscribed by the declarant as true under penalty of perjury, and dated, in substantially the following form . . . : `I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on (date). (Signature)'." 47 C.F.R. S: 1.16. 18 U.S.C. S: 1001 et seq. See also 47 C.F.R. S: 1.17. P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. S: 552a(e)(3). Federal Communications Commission 4 Federal Communications Commission References 1. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295595A1.pdf 2. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295595A1.doc
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-295627A1.html
  • shall be subscribed by the declarant as true under penalty of perjury, and dated, in substantially the following form . . . : `I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on (date). (Signature)'." 47 C.F.R. S: 1.16. 18 U.S.C. S: 1001 et seq. See also 47 C.F.R. S: 1.17. P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. S: 552a(e)(3). Federal Communications Commission 3 Federal Communications Commission References 1. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295627A1.pdf 2. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295627A1.doc
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-295629A1.html
  • shall be subscribed by the declarant as true under penalty of perjury, and dated, in substantially the following form . . . : `I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on (date). (Signature)'." 47 C.F.R. S: 1.16. 18 U.S.C. S: 1001 et seq. See also 47 C.F.R. S: 1.17. P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. S: 552a(e)(3). Federal Communications Commission 3 Federal Communications Commission References 1. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295629A1.pdf 2. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295629A1.doc
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-295634A1.html
  • shall be subscribed by the declarant as true under penalty of perjury, and dated, in substantially the following form . . . : `I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on (date). (Signature)'." 47 C.F.R. S: 1.16. 18 U.S.C. S: 1001 et seq. See also 47 C.F.R. S: 1.17. P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. S: 552a(e)(3). Federal Communications Commission 3 Federal Communications Commission References 1. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295634A1.pdf 2. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295634A1.doc
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-295635A1.html
  • shall be subscribed by the declarant as true under penalty of perjury, and dated, in substantially the following form . . . : `I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on (date). (Signature)'." 47 C.F.R. S: 1.16. 18 U.S.C. S: 1001 et seq. See also 47 C.F.R. S: 1.17. P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. S: 552a(e)(3). Federal Communications Commission 2 Federal Communications Commission References 1. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295635A1.pdf 2. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295635A1.doc
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-295637A1.html
  • shall be subscribed by the declarant as true under penalty of perjury, and dated, in substantially the following form . . . : `I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on (date). (Signature)'." 47 C.F.R. S: 1.16. 18 U.S.C. S: 1001 et seq. See also 47 C.F.R. S: 1.17. P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. S: 552a(e)(3). Federal Communications Commission 2 Federal Communications Commission References 1. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295637A1.pdf 2. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295637A1.doc
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-295639A1.html
  • shall be subscribed by the declarant as true under penalty of perjury, and dated, in substantially the following form . . . : `I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on (date). (Signature)'." 47 C.F.R. S: 1.16. 18 U.S.C. S: 1001 et seq. See also 47 C.F.R. S: 1.17. P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. S: 552a(e)(3). Federal Communications Commission 3 Federal Communications Commission References 1. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295639A1.pdf 2. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295639A1.doc
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-295640A1.html
  • shall be subscribed by the declarant as true under penalty of perjury, and dated, in substantially the following form . . . : `I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on (date). (Signature)'." 47 C.F.R. S: 1.16. 18 U.S.C. S: 1001 et seq. See also 47 C.F.R. S: 1.17. P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. S: 552a(e)(3). Federal Communications Commission 3 Federal Communications Commission References 1. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295640A1.pdf 2. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295640A1.doc
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-295830A1.html
  • shall be subscribed by the declarant as true under penalty of perjury, and dated, in substantially the following form . . . : `I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on (date). (Signature)'." 47 C.F.R. S: 1.16. 18 U.S.C. S: 1001 et seq. See also 47 C.F.R. S: 1.17. P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. S: 552a(e)(3). Federal Communications Commission 3 Federal Communications Commission References 1. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295830A1.pdf 2. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295830A1.doc
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-295831A1.html
  • shall be subscribed by the declarant as true under penalty of perjury, and dated, in substantially the following form . . . : 'I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on (date). (Signature)'." 47 C.F.R. S: 1.16. 18 U.S.C. S: 1001 et seq. See also 47 C.F.R. S: 1.17. P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. S: 552a(e)(3). Federal Communications Commission 3 Federal Communications Commission References 1. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295831A1.pdf 2. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295831A1.doc
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-295833A1.html
  • shall be subscribed by the declarant as true under penalty of perjury, and dated, in substantially the following form . . . : `I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on (date). (Signature)'." 47 C.F.R. S: 1.16. 18 U.S.C. S: 1001 et seq. See also 47 C.F.R. S: 1.17. P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. S: 552a(e)(3). Federal Communications Commission 3 Federal Communications Commission References 1. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295833A1.pdf 2. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295833A1.doc
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-295906A1.html
  • shall be subscribed by the declarant as true under penalty of perjury, and dated, in substantially the following form . . . : `I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on (date). (Signature)'." 47 C.F.R. S: 1.16. 18 U.S.C. S: 1001 et seq. See also 47 C.F.R. S: 1.17. P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. S: 552a(e)(3). Federal Communications Commission 3 Federal Communications Commission References 1. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295906A1.pdf 2. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295906A1.doc
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-295908A1.html
  • shall be subscribed by the declarant as true under penalty of perjury, and dated, in substantially the following form . . . : `I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on (date). (Signature)'." 47 C.F.R. S: 1.16. 18 U.S.C. S: 1001 et seq. See also 47 C.F.R. S: 1.17. P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. S: 552a(e)(3). Federal Communications Commission 2 Federal Communications Commission References 1. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295908A1.pdf 2. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295908A1.doc
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-295909A1.html
  • shall be subscribed by the declarant as true under penalty of perjury, and dated, in substantially the following form . . . : `I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on (date). (Signature)'." 47 C.F.R. S: 1.16. 18 U.S.C. S: 1001 et seq. See also 47 C.F.R. S: 1.17. P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. S: 552a(e)(3). Federal Communications Commission 2 Federal Communications Commission References 1. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295909A1.pdf 2. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295909A1.doc
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-295911A1.html
  • shall be subscribed by the declarant as true under penalty of perjury, and dated, in substantially the following form . . . : `I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on (date). (Signature)'." 47 C.F.R. S: 1.16. 18 U.S.C. S: 1001 et seq. See also 47 C.F.R. S: 1.17. P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. S: 552a(e)(3). Federal Communications Commission 2 Federal Communications Commission References 1. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295911A1.pdf 2. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295911A1.doc
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-295912A1.html
  • in your reply, to determine what, if any, enforcement action is required to ensure compliance. Any false statement made knowingly and willfully in reply to this Notice is punishable by fine or imprisonment under Title 18 of the U.S. Code. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Ryan Hagihara Resident Agent Honolulu Office Western Region Enforcement Bureau 47 C.F.R. S: 1.89. 47 C.F.R. S: 1.17. 47 U.S.C. S: 403. P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. S: 552a(e)(3). 18 U.S.C. S: 1001 et seq. Federal Communications Commission 2 Federal Communications Commission References 1. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295912A1.pdf 2. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295912A1.doc
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-296413A1.html
  • shall be subscribed by the declarant as true under penalty of perjury, and dated, in substantially the following form . . . : `I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on (date). (Signature)'." 47 C.F.R. S: 1.16. 18 U.S.C. S: 1001 et seq. See also 47 C.F.R. S: 1.17. P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. S: 552a(e)(3). Federal Communications Commission 3 Federal Communications Commission References 1. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-296413A1.pdf 2. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-296413A1.doc
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-296418A1.html
  • shall be subscribed by the declarant as true under penalty of perjury, and dated, in substantially the following form . . . : `I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on (date). (Signature)'." 47 C.F.R. S: 1.16. 18 U.S.C. S: 1001 et seq. See also 47 C.F.R. S: 1.17. P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. S: 552a(e)(3). Federal Communications Commission 3 Federal Communications Commission References 1. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-296418A1.pdf 2. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-296418A1.doc
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-296419A1.html
  • shall be subscribed by the declarant as true under penalty of perjury, and dated, in substantially the following form . . . : `I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on (date). (Signature)'." 47 C.F.R. S: 1.16. 18 U.S.C. S: 1001 et seq. See also 47 C.F.R. S: 1.17. P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. S: 552a(e)(3). Federal Communications Commission 3 Federal Communications Commission References 1. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-296419A1.pdf 2. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-296419A1.doc
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-296581A1.html
  • shall be subscribed by the declarant as true under penalty of perjury, and dated, in substantially the following form . . . : `I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on (date). (Signature)'." 47 C.F.R. S: 1.16. 18 U.S.C. S: 1001 et seq. See also 47 C.F.R. S: 1.17. P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. S: 552a(e)(3). 18 U.S.C. S: 1001 et seq. Federal Communications Commission 4 Federal Communications Commission References 1. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-296581A1.pdf 2. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-296581A1.doc
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-296712A1.html
  • shall be subscribed by the declarant as true under penalty of perjury, and dated, in substantially the following form . . . : `I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on (date). (Signature)'." 47 C.F.R. S: 1.16. 18 U.S.C. S: 1001 et seq. See also 47 C.F.R. S: 1.17. P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. S: 552a(e)(3). Federal Communications Commission 2 Federal Communications Commission References 1. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-296712A1.pdf 2. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-296712A1.doc
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-296842A1.html
  • shall be subscribed by the declarant as true under penalty of perjury, and dated, in substantially the following form . . . : `I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on (date). (Signature)'." 47 C.F.R. S: 1.16. 18 U.S.C. S: 1001 et seq. See also 47 C.F.R. S: 1.17. P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. S: 552a(e)(3). Federal Communications Commission 2 Federal Communications Commission References 1. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-296842A1.pdf 2. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-296842A1.doc
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-296847A1.html
  • shall be subscribed by the declarant as true under penalty of perjury, and dated, in substantially the following form . . . : `I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on (date). (Signature)'." 47 C.F.R. S: 1.16. 18 U.S.C. S: 1001 et seq. See also 47 C.F.R. S: 1.17. P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. S: 552a(e)(3). Federal Communications Commission 2 Federal Communications Commission References 1. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-296847A1.pdf 2. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-296847A1.doc
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-297322A1.html
  • shall be subscribed by the declarant as true under penalty of perjury, and dated, in substantially the following form . . . : `I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on (date). (Signature)'." 47 C.F.R. S: 1.16. 18 U.S.C. S: 1001 et seq. See also 47 C.F.R. S: 1.17. P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. S: 552a(e)(3). Federal Communications Commission 3 Federal Communications Commission References 1. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-297322A1.pdf 2. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-297322A1.doc
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-298186A1.html
  • shall be subscribed by the declarant as true under penalty of perjury, and dated, in substantially the following form . . . : `I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on (date). (Signature)'." 47 C.F.R. S: 1.16. 18 U.S.C. S: 1001 et seq. See also 47 C.F.R. S: 1.17. P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. S: 552a(e)(3). Federal Communications Commission 2 Federal Communications Commission References 1. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-298186A1.pdf 2. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-298186A1.doc
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-298343A1.html
  • shall be subscribed by the declarant as true under penalty of perjury, and dated, in substantially the following form . . . : `I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on (date). (Signature)'." 47 C.F.R. S: 1.16. 18 U.S.C. S: 1001 et seq. See also 47 C.F.R. S: 1.17. 47 U.S.C. S: 308(b). P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. S: 552a(e)(3). 18 U.S.C. S: 1001 et seq. Federal Communications Commission 3 Federal Communications Commission References 1. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-298343A1.pdf 2. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-298343A1.doc
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-298527A1.html
  • shall be subscribed by the declarant as true under penalty of perjury, and dated, in substantially the following form . . . : `I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on (date). (Signature)'." 47 C.F.R. S: 1.16. 18 U.S.C. S: 1001 et seq. See also 47 C.F.R. S: 1.17. P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. S: 552a(e)(3). Federal Communications Commission 2 Federal Communications Commission References 1. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-298527A1.pdf 2. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-298527A1.doc
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-298637A1.html
  • shall be subscribed by the declarant as true under penalty of perjury, and dated, in substantially the following form . . . : `I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on (date). (Signature)'." 47 C.F.R. S: 1.16. 18 U.S.C. S: 1001 et seq. See also 47 C.F.R. S: 1.17. P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. S: 552a(e)(3). Federal Communications Commission 2 Federal Communications Commission References 1. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-298637A1.pdf 2. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-298637A1.doc
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-298638A1.html
  • shall be subscribed by the declarant as true under penalty of perjury, and dated, in substantially the following form . . . : `I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on (date). (Signature)'." 47 C.F.R. S: 1.16. 18 U.S.C. S: 1001 et seq. See also 47 C.F.R. S: 1.17. P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. S: 552a(e)(3). Federal Communications Commission 3 Federal Communications Commission References 1. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-298638A1.pdf 2. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-298638A1.doc
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-299106A1.html
  • shall be subscribed by the declarant as true under penalty of perjury, and dated, in substantially the following form . . . : `I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on (date). (Signature)'." 47 C.F.R. S: 1.16. 18 U.S.C. S: 1001 et seq. See also 47 C.F.R. S: 1.17. P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. S: 552a(e)(3). Federal Communications Commission 2 Federal Communications Commission References 1. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-299106A1.pdf 2. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-299106A1.doc
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-299107A1.html
  • shall be subscribed by the declarant as true under penalty of perjury, and dated, in substantially the following form . . . : `I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on (date). (Signature)'." 47 C.F.R. S: 1.16. 18 U.S.C. S: 1001 et seq. See also 47 C.F.R. S: 1.17. P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. S: 552a(e)(3). Federal Communications Commission 2 Federal Communications Commission References 1. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-299107A1.pdf 2. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-299107A1.doc
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-299108A1.html
  • shall be subscribed by the declarant as true under penalty of perjury, and dated, in substantially the following form . . . : `I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on (date). (Signature)'." 47 C.F.R. S: 1.16. 18 U.S.C. S: 1001 et seq. See also 47 C.F.R. S: 1.17. P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. S: 552a(e)(3). Federal Communications Commission 2 Federal Communications Commission References 1. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-299108A1.pdf 2. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-299108A1.doc
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-299110A1.html
  • shall be subscribed by the declarant as true under penalty of perjury, and dated, in substantially the following form . . . : `I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on (date). (Signature)'." 47 C.F.R. S: 1.16. 18 U.S.C. S: 1001 et seq. See also 47 C.F.R. S: 1.17. P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. S: 552a(e)(3). Federal Communications Commission 3 Federal Communications Commission References 1. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-299110A1.pdf 2. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-299110A1.doc
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-299114A1.html
  • shall be subscribed by the declarant as true under penalty of perjury, and dated, in substantially the following form . . . : `I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on (date). (Signature)'." 47 C.F.R. S: 1.16. 18 U.S.C. S: 1001 et seq. See also 47 C.F.R. S: 1.17. P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. S: 552a(e)(3). Federal Communications Commission 3 Federal Communications Commission References 1. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-299114A1.pdf 2. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-299114A1.doc
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-299115A1.html
  • shall be subscribed by the declarant as true under penalty of perjury, and dated, in substantially the following form . . . : `I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on (date). (Signature)'." 47 C.F.R. S: 1.16. 18 U.S.C. S: 1001 et seq. See also 47 C.F.R. S: 1.17. P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. S: 552a(e)(3). Federal Communications Commission 3 Federal Communications Commission References 1. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-299115A1.pdf 2. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-299115A1.doc
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-299874A1.html
  • shall be subscribed by the declarant as true under penalty of perjury, and dated, in substantially the following form . . . : `I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on (date). (Signature)'." 47 C.F.R. S: 1.16. 18 U.S.C. S: 1001 et seq. See also 47 C.F.R. S: 1.17. P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. S: 552a(e)(3). Federal Communications Commission 2 Federal Communications Commission References 1. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-299874A1.pdf 2. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-299874A1.doc
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-300854A1.html
  • shall be subscribed by the declarant as true under penalty of perjury, and dated, in substantially the following form . . . : `I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on (date). (Signature)'." 47 C.F.R. S: 1.16. 18 U.S.C. S: 1001 et seq. See also 47 C.F.R. S: 1.17. Federal Communications Commission 3 Federal Communications Commission References 1. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-300854A1.pdf 2. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-300854A1.doc
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-300922A1.html
  • be subscribed by the declarant as true under penalty of perjury and dated, in substantially the following form . . . :" I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on (date). (Signature)'." 47 C.F. R. S: 1.16. 18 U.S.C. S: 1001 et seq. See also 47 C.F.R. S: 1.17. P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. S: 552a(e)(3). Federal Communications Commission 3 Federal Communications Commission References 1. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-300922A1.pdf 2. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-300922A1.doc
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-301056A1.html
  • disclosed in your reply, to determine what, if any, enforcement action is required to ensure compliance. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Douglas G. Miller District Director Atlanta District Office South Central Region Enforcement Bureau cc: WFLI-TV 47 C.F.R. S: 1.89. 3 47 U.S.C. S: 403 4 47 C.F.R. S: 1.89(c) 5 18 U.S.C. S: 1001 et seq. See also 47 C.F.R. S: 1.17. 6 P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. S: 552a(e)(3) Federal Communications Commission 2 Federal Communications Commission References 1. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-301056A1.pdf 2. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-301056A1.doc
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-301057A1.html
  • shall be subscribed by the declarant as true under penalty of perjury, and dated, in substantially the following form . . . : `I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on (date). (Signature)'." 47 C.F.R. S: 1.16. 18 U.S.C. S: 1001 et seq. See also 47 C.F.R. S: 1.17. P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. S: 552a(e)(3). Federal Communications Commission 3 Federal Communications Commission References 1. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-301057A1.pdf 2. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-301057A1.doc
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-301059A1.html
  • shall be subscribed by the declarant as true under penalty of perjury, and dated, in substantially the following form . . . : `I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on (date). (Signature)'." 47 C.F.R. S: 1.16. 18 U.S.C. S: 1001 et seq. See also 47 C.F.R. S: 1.17. P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. S: 552a(e)(3). Federal Communications Commission 3 Federal Communications Commission References 1. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-301059A1.pdf 2. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-301059A1.doc
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-301925A1.html
  • shall be subscribed by the declarant as true under penalty of perjury, and dated, in substantially the following form . . . : `I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on (date). (Signature)'." 47 C.F.R. S: 1.16. 18 U.S.C. S: 1001 et seq. See also 47 C.F.R. S: 1.17. P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. S: 552a(e)(3). Federal Communications Commission 2 Federal Communications Commission References 1. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-301925A1.pdf 2. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-301925A1.doc
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-301926A1.html
  • shall be subscribed by the declarant as true under penalty of perjury, and dated, in substantially the following form . . . : `I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on (date). (Signature)'." 47 C.F.R. S: 1.16. 18 U.S.C. S: 1001 et seq. See also 47 C.F.R. S: 1.17. P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. S: 552a(e)(3). Federal Communications Commission 3 Federal Communications Commission References 1. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-301926A1.pdf 2. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-301926A1.doc
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-301927A1.html
  • shall be subscribed by the declarant as true under penalty of perjury, and dated, in substantially the following form . . . : `I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on (date). (Signature)'." 47 C.F.R. S: 1.16. 18 U.S.C. S: 1001 et seq. See also 47 C.F.R. S: 1.17. P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. S: 552a(e)(3). Federal Communications Commission 2 Federal Communications Commission References 1. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-301927A1.pdf 2. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-301927A1.doc
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-302029A1.html
  • shall be subscribed by the declarant as true under penalty of perjury, and dated, in substantially the following form . . . : `I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on (date). (Signature)'." 47 C.F.R. S: 1.16. 18 U.S.C. S: 1001 et seq. See also 47 C.F.R. S: 1.17. P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. S: 552a(e)(3). Federal Communications Commission 3 Federal Communications Commission References 1. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-302029A1.pdf 2. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-302029A1.doc
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-302030A1.html
  • shall be subscribed by the declarant as true under penalty of perjury, and dated, in substantially the following form . . . : `I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on (date). (Signature)'." 47 C.F.R. S: 1.16. 18 U.S.C. S: 1001 et seq. See also 47 C.F.R. S: 1.17. P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. S: 552a(e)(3). Federal Communications Commission 3 Federal Communications Commission References 1. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-302030A1.pdf 2. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-302030A1.doc
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-302451A1.html
  • reply, to determine what, if any, enforcement action is required to ensure compliance. Any false statement made knowingly and willfully in reply to this Notice is punishable by fine or imprisonment under Title 18 of the U.S. Code. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION James M. Roop District Director Chicago District Office Northeast Region Enforcement Bureau 47 C.F.R. S: 1.89. 47 C.F.R. S: 1.17. 47 U.S.C. S: 308(b). P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. S: 552a(e)(3). 18 U.S.C. S: 1001 et seq. Federal Communications Commission 2 Federal Communications Commission References 1. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-302451A1.pdf 2. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-302451A1.doc
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-302530A1.html
  • shall be subscribed by the declarant as true under penalty of perjury, and dated, in substantially the following form . . . : `I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on (date). (Signature)'." 47 C.F.R. S: 1.16. 18 U.S.C. S: 1001 et seq. See also 47 C.F.R. S: 1.17. P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. S: 552a(e)(3). Federal Communications Commission 3 Federal Communications Commission References 1. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-302530A1.pdf 2. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-302530A1.doc
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-302531A1.html
  • shall be subscribed by the declarant as true under penalty of perjury, and dated, in substantially the following form . . . : `I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on (date). (Signature)'." 47 C.F.R. S: 1.16. 18 U.S.C. S: 1001 et seq. See also 47 C.F.R. S: 1.17. P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. S: 552a(e)(3). Federal Communications Commission 3 Federal Communications Commission References 1. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-302531A1.pdf 2. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-302531A1.doc
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-302781A1.html
  • cited above and could subject the operator to severe penalties, including, but not limited to, substantial monetary fines, in rem arrest action against the offending radio equipment, and criminal sanctions including imprisonment. (see 47 U.S.C. S:S: 401, 501, 503 and 510). UNLICENSED OPERATION OF THIS RADIO STATION MUST CEASE IMMEDIATELY. Pursuant to 47 U.S.C. S: 403 and 47 C.F.R. S: 1.17, you are directed to respond to the following questions and to provide any requested documentation: 1. If you are the operator of the station, provide evidence that you have authority to operate granted by the FCC. 2. If you are not the operators of the radio station or if there are others involved in the station's operation, provide the name(s)
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-302946A1.html
  • shall be subscribed by the declarant as true under penalty of perjury, and dated, in substantially the following form . . . : `I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on (date). (Signature)'." 47 C.F.R. S: 1.16. 18 U.S.C. S: 1001 et seq. See also 47 C.F.R. S: 1.17. P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. S: 552a(e)(3). Federal Communications Commission 3 Federal Communications Commission References 1. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-302946A1.pdf 2. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-302946A1.doc
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-303042A1.html
  • shall be subscribed by the declarant as true under penalty of perjury, and dated, in substantially the following form . . . : `I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on (date). (Signature)'." 47 C.F.R. S: 1.16. 18 U.S.C. S: 1001 et seq. See also 47 C.F.R. S: 1.17. P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. S: 552a(e)(3). 18 U.S.C. S: 1001 et seq. Federal Communications Commission 3 Federal Communications Commission References 1. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303042A1.pdf 2. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303042A1.doc
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-303222A1.html
  • shall be subscribed by the declarant as true under penalty of perjury, and dated, in substantially the following form . . . : `I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on (date). (Signature)'." 47 C.F.R. S: 1.16. 18 U.S.C. S: 1001 et seq. See also 47 C.F.R. S: 1.17. P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. S: 552a(e)(3). Federal Communications Commission 3 Federal Communications Commission References 1. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303222A1.pdf 2. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303222A1.doc
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-303695A1.html
  • shall be subscribed by the declarant as true under penalty of perjury, and dated, in substantially the following form . . . : `I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on (date). (Signature)'." 47 C.F.R. S: 1.16. 18 U.S.C. S: 1001 et seq. See also 47 C.F.R. S: 1.17. P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. S: 552a(e)(3). Federal Communications Commission 2 Federal Communications Commission References 1. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303695A1.pdf 2. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303695A1.doc
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-303811A1.html
  • shall be subscribed by the declarant as true under penalty of perjury, and dated, in substantially the following form . . . : `I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on (date). (Signature)'." 47 C.F.R. S: 1.16. 18 U.S.C. S: 1001 et seq. See also 47 C.F.R. S: 1.17. P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. S: 552a(e)(3). Federal Communications Commission 2 Federal Communications Commission References 1. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303811A1.pdf 2. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303811A1.doc
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-303812A1.html
  • shall be subscribed by the declarant as true under penalty of perjury, and dated, in substantially the following form . . . : `I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on (date). (Signature)'." 47 C.F.R. S: 1.16. 18 U.S.C. S: 1001 et seq. See also 47 C.F.R. S: 1.17. P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. S: 552a(e)(3). Federal Communications Commission 2 Federal Communications Commission References 1. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303812A1.pdf 2. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303812A1.doc
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-303813A1.html
  • shall be subscribed by the declarant as true under penalty of perjury, and dated, in substantially the following form . . . : `I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on (date). (Signature)'." 47 C.F.R. S: 1.16. 18 U.S.C. S: 1001 et seq. See also 47 C.F.R. S: 1.17. P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. S: 552a(e)(3). 18 U.S.C. S: 1001 et seq. Federal Communications Commission 3 Federal Communications Commission References 1. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303813A1.pdf 2. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303813A1.doc
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-303989A1.html
  • shall be subscribed by the declarant as true under penalty of perjury, and dated, in substantially the following form . . . : `I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on (date). (Signature)'." 47 C.F.R. S: 1.16. 18 U.S.C. S: 1001 et seq. See also 47 C.F.R. S: 1.17. P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. S: 552a(e)(3). Federal Communications Commission 3 Federal Communications Commission References 1. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303989A1.pdf 2. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303989A1.doc
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-304202A1.html
  • shall be subscribed by the declarant as true under penalty of perjury, and dated, in substantially the following form . . . : `I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on (date). (Signature)'." 47 C.F.R. S: 1.16. 18 U.S.C. S: 1001 et seq. See also 47 C.F.R. S: 1.17. P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. S: 552a(e)(3). 18 U.S.C. S: 1001 et seq. Federal Communications Commission 3 Federal Communications Commission References 1. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-304202A1.pdf 2. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-304202A1.doc
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-304628A1.html
  • shall be subscribed by the declarant as true under penalty of perjury, and dated, in substantially the following form . . . : `I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on (date). (Signature)'." 47 C.F.R. S: 1.16. 18 U.S.C. S: 1001 et seq. See also 47 C.F.R. S: 1.17. P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. S: 552a(e)(3). Federal Communications Commission 2 Federal Communications Commission References 1. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-304628A1.pdf 2. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-304628A1.doc
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-305116A1.html
  • shall be subscribed by the declarant as true under penalty of perjury, and dated, in substantially the following form . . . : `I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on (date). (Signature)'." 47 C.F.R. S: 1.16. 18 U.S.C. S: 1001 et seq. See also 47 C.F.R. S: 1.17. P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. S: 552a(e)(3). Federal Communications Commission 3 Federal Communications Commission References 1. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-305116A1.pdf 2. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-305116A1.doc
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-305159A1.html
  • shall be subscribed by the declarant as true under penalty of perjury, and dated, in substantially the following form . . . : `I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on (date). (Signature)'." 47 C.F.R. S: 1.16. 18 U.S.C. S: 1001 et seq. See also 47 C.F.R. S: 1.17. P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. S: 552a(e)(3). Federal Communications Commission 3 Federal Communications Commission References 1. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-305159A1.pdf 2. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-305159A1.doc
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-305160A1.html
  • shall be subscribed by the declarant as true under penalty of perjury, and dated, in substantially the following form . . . : `I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on (date). (Signature)'." 47 C.F.R. S: 1.16. 18 U.S.C. S: 1001 et seq. See also 47 C.F.R. S: 1.17. P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. S: 552a(e)(3). Federal Communications Commission 2 Federal Communications Commission References 1. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-305160A1.pdf 2. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-305160A1.doc
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-305410A1.html
  • shall be subscribed by the declarant as true under penalty of perjury, and dated, in substantially the following form . . . : `I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on (date). (Signature)'." 47 C.F.R. S: 1.16. 18 U.S.C. S: 1001 et seq. See also 47 C.F.R. S: 1.17. P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. S: 552a(e)(3). 18 U.S.C. S: 1001 et seq. Federal Communications Commission 3 Federal Communications Commission References 1. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-305410A1.pdf 2. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-305410A1.doc
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-306449A1.html
  • shall be subscribed by the declarant as true under penalty of perjury, and dated, in substantially the following form . . . : `I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on (date). (Signature)'." 47 C.F.R. S: 1.16. 18 U.S.C. S: 1001 et seq. See also 47 C.F.R. S: 1.17. P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. S: 552a(e)(3). 18 U.S.C. S: 1001 et seq. Federal Communications Commission 4 Federal Communications Commission References 1. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-306449A1.pdf 2. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-306449A1.doc
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-306474A1.html
  • shall be subscribed by the declarant as true under penalty of perjury, and dated, in substantially the following form . . . : `I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on (date). (Signature)'." 47 C.F.R. S: 1.16. 18 U.S.C. S: 1001 et seq. See also 47 C.F.R. S: 1.17. P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. S: 552a(e)(3). Federal Communications Commission 2 Federal Communications Commission References 1. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-306474A1.pdf 2. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-306474A1.doc
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-306901A1.html
  • shall be subscribed by the declarant as true under penalty of perjury, and dated, in substantially the following form . . . : `I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on (date). (Signature)'." 47 C.F.R. S: 1.16. 18 U.S.C. S: 1001 et seq. See also 47 C.F.R. S: 1.17. P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. S: 552a(e)(3). Federal Communications Commission 3 Federal Communications Commission References 1. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-306901A1.pdf 2. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-306901A1.doc
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-307477A1.html
  • shall be subscribed by the declarant as true under penalty of perjury, and dated, in substantially the following form . . . : `I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on (date). (Signature)'." 47 C.F.R. S: 1.16. 18 U.S.C. S: 1001 et seq. See also 47 C.F.R. S: 1.17. P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. S: 552a(e)(3). Federal Communications Commission 3 Federal Communications Commission References 1. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-307477A1.pdf 2. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-307477A1.doc
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-307999A1.html
  • shall be subscribed by the declarant as true under penalty of perjury, and dated, in substantially the following form . . . : `I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on (date). (Signature)'." 47 C.F.R. S: 1.16. 18 U.S.C. S: 1001 et seq. See also 47 C.F.R. S: 1.17. P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. S: 552a(e)(3). Federal Communications Commission 3 Federal Communications Commission References 1. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-307999A1.pdf 2. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-307999A1.doc
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-308322A1.html
  • shall be subscribed by the declarant as true under penalty of perjury, and dated, in substantially the following form . . . : `I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on (date). (Signature)'." 47 C.F.R. S: 1.16. 18 U.S.C. S: 1001 et seq. See also 47 C.F.R. S: 1.17. P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. S: 552a(e)(3). Federal Communications Commission 2 Federal Communications Commission References 1. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-308322A1.pdf 2. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-308322A1.doc
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-308323A1.html
  • shall be subscribed by the declarant as true under penalty of perjury, and dated, in substantially the following form . . . : `I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on (date). (Signature)'." 47 C.F.R. S: 1.16. 18 U.S.C. S: 1001 et seq. See also 47 C.F.R. S: 1.17. P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. S: 552a(e)(3). Federal Communications Commission 3 Federal Communications Commission References 1. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-308323A1.pdf 2. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-308323A1.doc
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-308324A1.html
  • shall be subscribed by the declarant as true under penalty of perjury, and dated, in substantially the following form . . . : `I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on (date). (Signature)'." 47 C.F.R. S: 1.16. 18 U.S.C. S: 1001 et seq. See also 47 C.F.R. S: 1.17. P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. S: 552a(e)(3). Federal Communications Commission 3 Federal Communications Commission References 1. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-308324A1.pdf 2. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-308324A1.doc
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-308325A1.html
  • shall be subscribed by the declarant as true under penalty of perjury, and dated, in substantially the following form . . . : `I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on (date). (Signature)'." 47 C.F.R. S: 1.16. 18 U.S.C. S: 1001 et seq. See also 47 C.F.R. S: 1.17. P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. S: 552a(e)(3). Federal Communications Commission 3 Federal Communications Commission References 1. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-308325A1.pdf 2. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-308325A1.doc
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-308326A1.html
  • shall be subscribed by the declarant as true under penalty of perjury, and dated, in substantially the following form . . . : `I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on (date). (Signature)'." 47 C.F.R. S: 1.16. 18 U.S.C. S: 1001 et seq. See also 47 C.F.R. S: 1.17. P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. S: 552a(e)(3). Federal Communications Commission 3 Federal Communications Commission References 1. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-308326A1.pdf 2. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-308326A1.doc
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-308421A1.html
  • shall be subscribed by the declarant as true under penalty of perjury, and dated, in substantially the following form . . . : `I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on (date). (Signature)'." 47 C.F.R. S: 1.16. 18 U.S.C. S: 1001 et seq. See also 47 C.F.R. S: 1.17. P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. S: 552a(e)(3). Federal Communications Commission 3 Federal Communications Commission References 1. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-308421A1.pdf 2. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-308421A1.doc
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-308425A1.html
  • shall be subscribed by the declarant as true under penalty of perjury, and dated, in substantially the following form . . . : `I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on (date). (Signature)'." 47 C.F.R. S: 1.16. 18 U.S.C. S: 1001 et seq. See also 47 C.F.R. S: 1.17. P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. S: 552a(e)(3). Federal Communications Commission 2 Federal Communications Commission References 1. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-308425A1.pdf 2. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-308425A1.doc
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-308426A1.html
  • shall be subscribed by the declarant as true under penalty of perjury, and dated, in substantially the following form . . . : `I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on (date). (Signature)'." 47 C.F.R. S: 1.16. 18 U.S.C. S: 1001 et seq. See also 47 C.F.R. S: 1.17. P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. S: 552a(e)(3). Federal Communications Commission 2 Federal Communications Commission References 1. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-308426A1.pdf 2. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-308426A1.doc
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-308427A1.html
  • shall be subscribed by the declarant as true under penalty of perjury, and dated, in substantially the following form . . . : `I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on (date). (Signature)'." 47 C.F.R. S: 1.16. 18 U.S.C. S: 1001 et seq. See also 47 C.F.R. S: 1.17. P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. S: 552a(e)(3). Federal Communications Commission 2 Federal Communications Commission References 1. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-308427A1.pdf 2. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-308427A1.doc
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-308940A1.html
  • shall be subscribed by the declarant as true under penalty of perjury, and dated, in substantially the following form . . . : `I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on (date). (Signature)'." 47 C.F.R. S: 1.16. 18 U.S.C. S: 1001 et seq. See also 47 C.F.R. S: 1.17. P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. S: 552a(e)(3). 18 U.S.C. S: 1001 et seq. Federal Communications Commission 3 Federal Communications Commission References 1. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-308940A1.pdf 2. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-308940A1.doc
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-308942A1.html
  • shall be subscribed by the declarant as true under penalty of perjury, and dated, in substantially the following form . . . : `I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on (date). (Signature)'." 47 C.F.R. S: 1.16. 18 U.S.C. S: 1001 et seq. See also 47 C.F.R. S: 1.17. P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. S: 552a(e)(3). Federal Communications Commission 3 Federal Communications Commission References 1. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-308942A1.pdf 2. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-308942A1.doc
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-309208A1.html
  • shall be subscribed by the declarant as true under penalty of perjury, and dated, in substantially the following form . . . : `I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on (date). (Signature)'." 47 C.F.R. S: 1.16. 18 U.S.C. S: 1001 et seq. See also 47 C.F.R. S: 1.17. P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. S: 552a(e)(3). Federal Communications Commission 1 2 Federal Communications Commission References 1. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-309208A1.pdf 2. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-309208A1.doc
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-309310A1.html
  • shall be subscribed by the declarant as true under penalty of perjury, and dated, in substantially the following form . . . : `I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on (date). (Signature)'." 47 C.F.R. S: 1.16. 18 U.S.C. S: 1001 et seq. See also 47 C.F.R. S: 1.17. P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. S: 552a(e)(3). Federal Communications Commission 3 Federal Communications Commission References 1. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-309310A1.pdf 2. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-309310A1.doc
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-309449A1.html
  • shall be subscribed by the declarant as true under penalty of perjury, and dated, in substantially the following form . . . : `I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on (date). (Signature)'." 47 C.F.R. S: 1.16. 18 U.S.C. S: 1001 et seq. See also 47 C.F.R. S: 1.17. P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. S: 552a(e)(3). Federal Communications Commission 3 Federal Communications Commission References 1. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-309449A1.pdf 2. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-309449A1.doc
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-309786A1.html
  • shall be subscribed by the declarant as true under penalty of perjury, and dated, in substantially the following form . . . : `I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on (date). (Signature)'." 47 C.F.R. S: 1.16. 18 U.S.C. S: 1001 et seq. See also 47 C.F.R. S: 1.17. P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. S: 552a(e)(3). Federal Communications Commission 2 Federal Communications Commission References 1. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-309786A1.pdf 2. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-309786A1.doc
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-309787A1.html
  • shall be subscribed by the declarant as true under penalty of perjury, and dated, in substantially the following form . . . : `I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on (date). (Signature)'." 47 C.F.R. S: 1.16. 18 U.S.C. S: 1001 et seq. See also 47 C.F.R. S: 1.17. P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. S: 552a(e)(3). Federal Communications Commission 2 Federal Communications Commission References 1. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-309787A1.pdf 2. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-309787A1.doc
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-309788A1.html
  • shall be subscribed by the declarant as true under penalty of perjury, and dated, in substantially the following form . . . : `I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on (date). (Signature)'." 47 C.F.R. S: 1.16. 18 U.S.C. S: 1001 et seq. See also 47 C.F.R. S: 1.17. P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. S: 552a(e)(3). Federal Communications Commission 2 Federal Communications Commission References 1. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-309788A1.pdf 2. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-309788A1.doc
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-309789A1.html
  • shall be subscribed by the declarant as true under penalty of perjury, and dated, in substantially the following form . . . : `I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on (date). (Signature)'." 47 C.F.R. S: 1.16. 18 U.S.C. S: 1001 et seq. See also 47 C.F.R. S: 1.17. P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. S: 552a(e)(3). Federal Communications Commission 2 Federal Communications Commission References 1. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-309789A1.pdf 2. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-309789A1.doc
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-309790A1.html
  • shall be subscribed by the declarant as true under penalty of perjury, and dated, in substantially the following form . . . : `I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on (date). (Signature)'." 47 C.F.R. S: 1.16. 18 U.S.C. S: 1001 et seq. See also 47 C.F.R. S: 1.17. P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. S: 552a(e)(3). Federal Communications Commission 3 Federal Communications Commission References 1. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-309790A1.pdf 2. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-309790A1.doc
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-309791A1.html
  • shall be subscribed by the declarant as true under penalty of perjury, and dated, in substantially the following form . . . : `I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on (date). (Signature)'." 47 C.F.R. S: 1.16. 18 U.S.C. S: 1001 et seq. See also 47 C.F.R. S: 1.17. P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. S: 552a(e)(3). Federal Communications Commission 3 Federal Communications Commission References 1. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-309791A1.pdf 2. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-309791A1.doc
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-309794A1.html
  • shall be subscribed by the declarant as true under penalty of perjury, and dated, in substantially the following form . . . : `I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on (date). (Signature)'." 47 C.F.R. S: 1.16. 18 U.S.C. S: 1001 et seq. See also 47 C.F.R. S: 1.17. P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. S: 552a(e)(3). Federal Communications Commission 3 Federal Communications Commission References 1. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-309794A1.pdf 2. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-309794A1.doc
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-309795A1.html
  • shall be subscribed by the declarant as true under penalty of perjury, and dated, in substantially the following form . . . : `I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on (date). (Signature)'." 47 C.F.R. S: 1.16. 18 U.S.C. S: 1001 et seq. See also 47 C.F.R. S: 1.17. P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. S: 552a(e)(3). Federal Communications Commission 3 Federal Communications Commission References 1. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-309795A1.pdf 2. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-309795A1.doc
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-309796A1.html
  • shall be subscribed by the declarant as true under penalty of perjury, and dated, in substantially the following form . . . : `I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on (date). (Signature)'." 47 C.F.R. S: 1.16. 18 U.S.C. S: 1001 et seq. See also 47 C.F.R. S: 1.17. P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. S: 552a(e)(3). Federal Communications Commission 3 Federal Communications Commission References 1. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-309796A1.pdf 2. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-309796A1.doc
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-309797A1.html
  • shall be subscribed by the declarant as true under penalty of perjury, and dated, in substantially the following form . . . : `I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on (date). (Signature)'." 47 C.F.R. S: 1.16. 18 U.S.C. S: 1001 et seq. See also 47 C.F.R. S: 1.17. P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. S: 552a(e)(3). Federal Communications Commission 3 Federal Communications Commission References 1. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-309797A1.pdf 2. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-309797A1.doc
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-309798A1.html
  • shall be subscribed by the declarant as true under penalty of perjury, and dated, in substantially the following form . . . : `I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on (date). (Signature)'." 47 C.F.R. S: 1.16. 18 U.S.C. S: 1001 et seq. See also 47 C.F.R. S: 1.17. P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. S: 552a(e)(3). Federal Communications Commission 3 Federal Communications Commission References 1. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-309798A1.pdf 2. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-309798A1.doc
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-309799A1.html
  • shall be subscribed by the declarant as true under penalty of perjury, and dated, in substantially the following form . . . : `I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on (date). (Signature)'." 47 C.F.R. S: 1.16. 18 U.S.C. S: 1001 et seq. See also 47 C.F.R. S: 1.17. P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. S: 552a(e)(3). Federal Communications Commission 3 Federal Communications Commission References 1. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-309799A1.pdf 2. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-309799A1.doc
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-309803A1.html
  • shall be subscribed by the declarant as true under penalty of perjury, and dated, in substantially the following form . . . : `I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on (date). (Signature)'." 47 C.F.R. S: 1.16. 18 U.S.C. S: 1001 et seq. See also 47 C.F.R. S: 1.17. P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. S: 552a(e)(3). Federal Communications Commission 3 Federal Communications Commission References 1. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-309803A1.pdf 2. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-309803A1.doc
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-309811A1.html
  • shall be subscribed by the declarant as true under penalty of perjury, and dated, in substantially the following form . . . : `I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on (date). (Signature)'." 47 C.F.R. S: 1.16. 18 U.S.C. S: 1001 et seq. See also 47 C.F.R. S: 1.17. P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. S: 552a(e)(3). Federal Communications Commission 3 Federal Communications Commission References 1. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-309811A1.pdf 2. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-309811A1.doc
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-310098A1.html
  • shall be subscribed by the declarant as true under penalty of perjury, and dated, in substantially the following form . . . : `I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on (date). (Signature)'." 47 C.F.R. S: 1.16. 18 U.S.C. S: 1001 et seq. See also 47 C.F.R. S: 1.17. P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. S: 552a(e)(3). Federal Communications Commission 3 Federal Communications Commission References 1. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-310098A1.pdf 2. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-310098A1.doc
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-310099A1.html
  • shall be subscribed by the declarant as true under penalty of perjury, and dated, in substantially the following form . . . : `I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on (date). (Signature)'." 47 C.F.R. S: 1.16. 18 U.S.C. S: 1001 et seq. See also 47 C.F.R. S: 1.17. P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. S: 552a(e)(3). Federal Communications Commission 3 Federal Communications Commission References 1. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-310099A1.pdf 2. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-310099A1.doc
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-310100A1.html
  • shall be subscribed by the declarant as true under penalty of perjury, and dated, in substantially the following form . . . : `I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on (date). (Signature)'." 47 C.F.R. S: 1.16. 18 U.S.C. S: 1001 et seq. See also 47 C.F.R. S: 1.17. P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. S: 552a(e)(3). Federal Communications Commission 2 Federal Communications Commission References 1. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-310100A1.pdf 2. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-310100A1.doc
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-310101A1.html
  • shall be subscribed by the declarant as true under penalty of perjury, and dated, in substantially the following form . . . : `I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on (date). (Signature)'." 47 C.F.R. S: 1.16. 18 U.S.C. S: 1001 et seq. See also 47 C.F.R. S: 1.17. P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. S: 552a(e)(3). Federal Communications Commission 3 Federal Communications Commission References 1. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-310101A1.pdf 2. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-310101A1.doc
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-310311A1.html
  • shall be subscribed by the declarant as true under penalty of perjury, and dated, in substantially the following form . . . : `I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on (date). (Signature)'." 47 C.F.R. S: 1.16. 18 U.S.C. S: 1001 et seq. See also 47 C.F.R. S: 1.17. P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. S: 552a(e)(3). Federal Communications Commission 3 Federal Communications Commission References 1. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-310311A1.pdf 2. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-310311A1.doc
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-310312A1.html
  • shall be subscribed by the declarant as true under penalty of perjury, and dated, in substantially the following form . . . : `I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on (date). (Signature)'." 47 C.F.R. S: 1.16. 18 U.S.C. S: 1001 et seq. See also 47 C.F.R. S: 1.17. P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. S: 552a(e)(3). Federal Communications Commission 2 Federal Communications Commission References 1. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-310312A1.pdf 2. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-310312A1.doc
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-310313A1.html
  • shall be subscribed by the declarant as true under penalty of perjury, and dated, in substantially the following form . . . : `I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on (date). (Signature)'." 47 C.F.R. S: 1.16. 18 U.S.C. S: 1001 et seq. See also 47 C.F.R. S: 1.17. P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. S: 552a(e)(3). Federal Communications Commission 3 Federal Communications Commission References 1. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-310313A1.pdf 2. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-310313A1.doc
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-310620A1.html
  • shall be subscribed by the declarant as true under penalty of perjury, and dated, in substantially the following form . . . : `I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on (date). (Signature)'." 47 C.F.R. S: 1.16. 18 U.S.C. S: 1001 et seq. See also 47 C.F.R. S: 1.17. P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. S: 552a(e)(3). Federal Communications Commission 3 Federal Communications Commission References 1. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-310620A1.pdf 2. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-310620A1.doc
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-310731A1.html
  • shall be subscribed by the declarant as true under penalty of perjury, and dated, in substantially the following form . . . : `I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on (date). (Signature)'." 47 C.F.R. S: 1.16. 18 U.S.C. S: 1001 et seq. See also 47 C.F.R. S: 1.17. P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. S: 552a(e)(3). Federal Communications Commission 3 Federal Communications Commission References 1. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-310731A1.pdf 2. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-310731A1.doc
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-310868A1.html
  • shall be subscribed by the declarant as true under penalty of perjury, and dated, in substantially the following form . . . : `I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on (date). (Signature)'." 47 C.F.R. S: 1.16. 18 U.S.C. S: 1001 et seq. See also 47 C.F.R. S: 1.17. P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. S: 552a(e)(3). Federal Communications Commission 2 Federal Communications Commission References 1. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-310868A1.pdf 2. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-310868A1.doc
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-310869A1.html
  • shall be subscribed by the declarant as true under penalty of perjury, and dated, in substantially the following form . . . : `I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on (date). (Signature)'." 47 C.F.R. S: 1.16. 18 U.S.C. S: 1001 et seq. See also 47 C.F.R. S: 1.17. P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. S: 552a(e)(3). Federal Communications Commission 4 Federal Communications Commission References 1. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-310869A1.pdf 2. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-310869A1.doc
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-310870A1.html
  • shall be subscribed by the declarant as true under penalty of perjury, and dated, in substantially the following form . . . : `I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on (date). (Signature)'." 47 C.F.R. S: 1.16. 18 U.S.C. S: 1001 et seq. See also 47 C.F.R. S: 1.17. P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. S: 552a(e)(3). Federal Communications Commission 3 Federal Communications Commission References 1. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-310870A1.pdf 2. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-310870A1.doc
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-310970A1.html
  • shall be subscribed by the declarant as true under penalty of perjury, and dated, in substantially the following form . . . : `I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on (date). (Signature)'." 47 C.F.R. S: 1.16. 18 U.S.C. S: 1001 et seq. See also 47 C.F.R. S: 1.17. P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. S: 552a(e)(3). Federal Communications Commission 3 Federal Communications Commission References 1. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-310970A1.pdf 2. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-310970A1.doc
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-311568A1.html
  • shall be subscribed by the declarant as true under penalty of perjury, and dated, in substantially the following form . . . : `I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on (date). (Signature)'." 47 C.F.R. S: 1.16. 18 U.S.C. S: 1001 et seq. See also 47 C.F.R. S: 1.17. P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. S: 552a(e)(3). Federal Communications Commission 1 2 Federal Communications Commission References 1. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-311568A1.pdf 2. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-311568A1.doc
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-311569A1.html
  • shall be subscribed by the declarant as true under penalty of perjury, and dated, in substantially the following form . . . : `I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on (date). (Signature)'." 47 C.F.R. S: 1.16. 18 U.S.C. S: 1001 et seq. See also 47 C.F.R. S: 1.17. P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. S: 552a(e)(3). Federal Communications Commission 1 3 Federal Communications Commission References 1. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-311569A1.pdf 2. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-311569A1.doc
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-311695A1.html
  • shall be subscribed by the declarant as true under penalty of perjury, and dated, in substantially the following form . . . : `I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on (date). (Signature)'." 47 C.F.R. S: 1.16. 18 U.S.C. S: 1001 et seq. See also 47 C.F.R. S: 1.17. P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. S: 552a(e)(3). Federal Communications Commission 4 Federal Communications Commission References 1. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-311695A1.pdf 2. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-311695A1.doc
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-311702A1.html
  • shall be subscribed by the declarant as true under penalty of perjury, and dated, in substantially the following form . . . : `I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on (date). (Signature)'." 47 C.F.R. S: 1.16. 18 U.S.C. S: 1001 et seq. See also 47 C.F.R. S: 1.17. P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. S: 552a(e)(3). Federal Communications Commission 2 Federal Communications Commission References 1. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-311702A1.pdf 2. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-311702A1.doc
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-311703A1.html
  • shall be subscribed by the declarant as true under penalty of perjury, and dated, in substantially the following form . . . : `I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on (date). (Signature)'." 47 C.F.R. S: 1.16. 18 U.S.C. S: 1001 et seq. See also 47 C.F.R. S: 1.17. P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. S: 552a(e)(3). Federal Communications Commission 2 Federal Communications Commission References 1. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-311703A1.pdf 2. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-311703A1.doc
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-311710A1.html
  • shall be subscribed by the declarant as true under penalty of perjury, and dated, in substantially the following form . . . : `I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on (date). (Signature)'." 47 C.F.R. S: 1.16. 18 U.S.C. S: 1001 et seq. See also 47 C.F.R. S: 1.17. P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. S: 552a(e)(3). Federal Communications Commission 3 Federal Communications Commission References 1. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-311710A1.pdf 2. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-311710A1.doc
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-311713A1.html
  • shall be subscribed by the declarant as true under penalty of perjury, and dated, in substantially the following form . . . : `I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on (date). (Signature)'." 47 C.F.R. S: 1.16. 18 U.S.C. S: 1001 et seq. See also 47 C.F.R. S: 1.17. P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. S: 552a(e)(3). Federal Communications Commission 2 Federal Communications Commission References 1. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-311713A1.pdf 2. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-311713A1.doc
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-311714A1.html
  • shall be subscribed by the declarant as true under penalty of perjury, and dated, in substantially the following form . . . : `I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on (date). (Signature)'." 47 C.F.R. S: 1.16. 18 U.S.C. S: 1001 et seq. See also 47 C.F.R. S: 1.17. P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. S: 552a(e)(3). Federal Communications Commission 3 Federal Communications Commission References 1. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-311714A1.pdf 2. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-311714A1.doc
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-311715A1.html
  • shall be subscribed by the declarant as true under penalty of perjury, and dated, in substantially the following form . . . : `I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on (date). (Signature)'." 47 C.F.R. S: 1.16. 18 U.S.C. S: 1001 et seq. See also 47 C.F.R. S: 1.17. P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. S: 552a(e)(3). Federal Communications Commission 3 Federal Communications Commission References 1. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-311715A1.pdf 2. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-311715A1.doc
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-312032A1.html
  • shall be subscribed by the declarant as true under penalty of perjury, and dated, in substantially the following form . . . : `I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on (date). (Signature)'." 47 C.F.R. S: 1.16. 18 U.S.C. S: 1001 et seq. See also 47 C.F.R. S: 1.17. P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. S: 552a(e)(3). Federal Communications Commission 2 Federal Communications Commission References 1. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-312032A1.pdf 2. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-312032A1.doc
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-312033A1.html
  • shall be subscribed by the declarant as true under penalty of perjury, and dated, in substantially the following form . . . : `I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on (date). (Signature)'." 47 C.F.R. S: 1.16. 18 U.S.C. S: 1001 et seq. See also 47 C.F.R. S: 1.17. P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. S: 552a(e)(3). Federal Communications Commission 2 Federal Communications Commission References 1. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-312033A1.pdf 2. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-312033A1.doc
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-312038A1.html
  • shall be subscribed by the declarant as true under penalty of perjury, and dated, in substantially the following form . . . : `I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on (date). (Signature)'." 47 C.F.R. S: 1.16. 18 U.S.C. S: 1001 et seq. See also 47 C.F.R. S: 1.17. P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. S: 552a(e)(3). Federal Communications Commission 3 3 Federal Communications Commission References 1. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-312038A1.pdf 2. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-312038A1.doc
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-312039A1.html
  • shall be subscribed by the declarant as true under penalty of perjury, and dated, in substantially the following form . . . : `I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on (date). (Signature)'." 47 C.F.R. S: 1.16. 18 U.S.C. S: 1001 et seq. See also 47 C.F.R. S: 1.17. P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. S: 552a(e)(3). Federal Communications Commission 3 3 Federal Communications Commission References 1. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-312039A1.pdf 2. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-312039A1.doc
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-312040A1.html
  • shall be subscribed by the declarant as true under penalty of perjury, and dated, in substantially the following form . . . : `I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on (date). (Signature)'." 47 C.F.R. S: 1.16. 18 U.S.C. S: 1001 et seq. See also 47 C.F.R. S: 1.17. P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. S: 552a(e)(3). Federal Communications Commission 3 Federal Communications Commission References 1. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-312040A1.pdf 2. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-312040A1.doc
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-312041A1.html
  • shall be subscribed by the declarant as true under penalty of perjury, and dated, in substantially the following form . . . : `I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on (date). (Signature)'." 47 C.F.R. S: 1.16. 18 U.S.C. S: 1001 et seq. See also 47 C.F.R. S: 1.17. P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. S: 552a(e)(3). Federal Communications Commission 3 Federal Communications Commission References 1. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-312041A1.pdf 2. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-312041A1.doc
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-312042A1.html
  • shall be subscribed by the declarant as true under penalty of perjury, and dated, in substantially the following form . . . : `I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on (date). (Signature)'." 47 C.F.R. S: 1.16. 18 U.S.C. S: 1001 et seq. See also 47 C.F.R. S: 1.17. P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. S: 552a(e)(3). Federal Communications Commission 3 Federal Communications Commission References 1. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-312042A1.pdf 2. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-312042A1.doc
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-312043A1.html
  • shall be subscribed by the declarant as true under penalty of perjury, and dated, in substantially the following form . . . : `I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on (date). (Signature)'." 47 C.F.R. S: 1.16. 18 U.S.C. S: 1001 et seq. See also 47 C.F.R. S: 1.17. P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. S: 552a(e)(3). Federal Communications Commission 2 Federal Communications Commission References 1. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-312043A1.pdf 2. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-312043A1.doc
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-312044A1.html
  • shall be subscribed by the declarant as true under penalty of perjury, and dated, in substantially the following form . . . : `I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on (date). (Signature)'." 47 C.F.R. S: 1.16. 18 U.S.C. S: 1001 et seq. See also 47 C.F.R. S: 1.17. P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. S: 552a(e)(3). Federal Communications Commission 3 Federal Communications Commission References 1. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-312044A1.pdf 2. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-312044A1.doc
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-312045A1.html
  • shall be subscribed by the declarant as true under penalty of perjury, and dated, in substantially the following form . . . : `I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on (date). (Signature)'." 47 C.F.R. S: 1.16. 18 U.S.C. S: 1001 et seq. See also 47 C.F.R. S: 1.17. P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. S: 552a(e)(3). Federal Communications Commission 3 Federal Communications Commission References 1. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-312045A1.pdf 2. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-312045A1.doc
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-312046A1.html
  • shall be subscribed by the declarant as true under penalty of perjury, and dated, in substantially the following form . . . : `I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on (date). (Signature)'." 47 C.F.R. S: 1.16. 18 U.S.C. S: 1001 et seq. See also 47 C.F.R. S: 1.17. P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. S: 552a(e)(3). Federal Communications Commission 3 Federal Communications Commission References 1. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-312046A1.pdf 2. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-312046A1.doc
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-312553A1.html
  • shall be subscribed by the declarant as true under penalty of perjury, and dated, in substantially the following form . . . : `I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on (date). (Signature)'." 47 C.F.R. S: 1.16. 18 U.S.C. S: 1001 et seq. See also 47 C.F.R. S: 1.17. P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. S: 552a(e)(3). 18 U.S.C. S: 1001 et seq. Federal Communications Commission 4 Federal Communications Commission References 1. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-312553A1.pdf 2. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-312553A1.doc
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-312556A1.html
  • shall be subscribed by the declarant as true under penalty of perjury, and dated, in substantially the following form . . . : `I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on (date). (Signature)'." 47 C.F.R. S: 1.16. 18 U.S.C. S: 1001 et seq. See also 47 C.F.R. S: 1.17. P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. S: 552a(e)(3). Federal Communications Commission 3 Federal Communications Commission References 1. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-312556A1.pdf 2. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-312556A1.doc
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-312655A1.html
  • shall be subscribed by the declarant as true under penalty of perjury, and dated, in substantially the following form . . . : `I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on (date). (Signature)'." 47 C.F.R. S: 1.16. 18 U.S.C. S: 1001 et seq. See also 47 C.F.R. S: 1.17. P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. S: 552a(e)(3). Federal Communications Commission 3 Federal Communications Commission References 1. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-312655A1.pdf 2. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-312655A1.doc
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-312656A1.html
  • shall be subscribed by the declarant as true under penalty of perjury, and dated, in substantially the following form . . . : `I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on (date). (Signature)'." 47 C.F.R. S: 1.16. 18 U.S.C. S: 1001 et seq. See also 47 C.F.R. S: 1.17. P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. S: 552a(e)(3). Federal Communications Commission 3 Federal Communications Commission References 1. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-312656A1.pdf 2. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-312656A1.doc
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-312657A1.html
  • shall be subscribed by the declarant as true under penalty of perjury, and dated, in substantially the following form . . . : `I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on (date). (Signature)'." 47 C.F.R. S: 1.16. 18 U.S.C. S: 1001 et seq. See also 47 C.F.R. S: 1.17. P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. S: 552a(e)(3). Federal Communications Commission 3 Federal Communications Commission References 1. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-312657A1.pdf 2. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-312657A1.doc
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-312908A1.html
  • shall be subscribed by the declarant as true under penalty of perjury, and dated, in substantially the following form . . . : `I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on (date). (Signature)'." 47 C.F.R. S: 1.16. 18 U.S.C. S: 1001 et seq. See also 47 C.F.R. S: 1.17. P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. S: 552a(e)(3). Federal Communications Commission 3 Federal Communications Commission References 1. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-312908A1.pdf 2. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-312908A1.doc
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-313467A1.html
  • shall be subscribed by the declarant as true under penalty of perjury, and dated, in substantially the following form . . . : `I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on (date). (Signature)'." 47 C.F.R. S: 1.16. 18 U.S.C. S: 1001 et seq. See also 47 C.F.R. S: 1.17. P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. S: 552a(e)(3). Federal Communications Commission 3 Federal Communications Commission References 1. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-313467A1.pdf 2. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-313467A1.doc
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-313468A1.html
  • shall be subscribed by the declarant as true under penalty of perjury, and dated, in substantially the following form . . . : `I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on (date). (Signature)'." 47 C.F.R. S: 1.16. 18 U.S.C. S: 1001 et seq. See also 47 C.F.R. S: 1.17. P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. S: 552a(e)(3). Federal Communications Commission 3 Federal Communications Commission References 1. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-313468A1.pdf 2. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-313468A1.doc
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-313584A1.html
  • shall be subscribed by the declarant as true under penalty of perjury, and dated, in substantially the following form . . . : `I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on (date). (Signature)'." 47 C.F.R. S: 1.16. 18 U.S.C. S: 1001 et seq. See also 47 C.F.R. S: 1.17. P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. S: 552a(e)(3). Federal Communications Commission 3 Federal Communications Commission References 1. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-313584A1.pdf 2. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-313584A1.doc
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-313585A1.html
  • shall be subscribed by the declarant as true under penalty of perjury, and dated, in substantially the following form . . . : `I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on (date). (Signature)'." 47 C.F.R. S: 1.16. 18 U.S.C. S: 1001 et seq. See also 47 C.F.R. S: 1.17. P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. S: 552a(e)(3). Federal Communications Commission 3 Federal Communications Commission References 1. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-313585A1.pdf 2. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-313585A1.doc
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-313586A1.html
  • shall be subscribed by the declarant as true under penalty of perjury, and dated, in substantially the following form . . . : `I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on (date). (Signature)'." 47 C.F.R. S: 1.16. 18 U.S.C. S: 1001 et seq. See also 47 C.F.R. S: 1.17. P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. S: 552a(e)(3). Federal Communications Commission 3 Federal Communications Commission References 1. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-313586A1.pdf 2. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-313586A1.doc
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-313587A1.html
  • shall be subscribed by the declarant as true under penalty of perjury, and dated, in substantially the following form . . . : `I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on (date). (Signature)'." 47 C.F.R. S: 1.16. 18 U.S.C. S: 1001 et seq. See also 47 C.F.R. S: 1.17. P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. S: 552a(e)(3). Federal Communications Commission 3 Federal Communications Commission References 1. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-313587A1.pdf 2. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-313587A1.doc
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-313588A1.html
  • shall be subscribed by the declarant as true under penalty of perjury, and dated, in substantially the following form . . . : `I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on (date). (Signature)'." 47 C.F.R. S: 1.16. 18 U.S.C. S: 1001 et seq. See also 47 C.F.R. S: 1.17. P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. S: 552a(e)(3). Federal Communications Commission 3 Federal Communications Commission References 1. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-313588A1.pdf 2. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-313588A1.doc
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-314039A1.html
  • shall be subscribed by the declarant as true under penalty of perjury, and dated, in substantially the following form . . . : `I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on (date). (Signature)'." 47 C.F.R. S: 1.16. 18 U.S.C. S: 1001 et seq. See also 47 C.F.R. S: 1.17. P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. S: 552a(e)(3). Federal Communications Commission 3 Federal Communications Commission References 1. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-314039A1.pdf 2. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-314039A1.doc
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-314040A1.html
  • shall be subscribed by the declarant as true under penalty of perjury, and dated, in substantially the following form . . . : `I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on (date). (Signature)'." 47 C.F.R. S: 1.16. 18 U.S.C. S: 1001 et seq. See also 47 C.F.R. S: 1.17. P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. S: 552a(e)(3). Federal Communications Commission 2 Federal Communications Commission References 1. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-314040A1.pdf 2. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-314040A1.doc
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-314041A1.html
  • shall be subscribed by the declarant as true under penalty of perjury, and dated, in substantially the following form . . . : `I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on (date). (Signature)'." 47 C.F.R. S: 1.16. 18 U.S.C. S: 1001 et seq. See also 47 C.F.R. S: 1.17. P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. S: 552a(e)(3). Federal Communications Commission 3 Federal Communications Commission References 1. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-314041A1.pdf 2. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-314041A1.doc
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-314042A1.html
  • shall be subscribed by the declarant as true under penalty of perjury, and dated, in substantially the following form . . . : `I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on (date). (Signature)'." 47 C.F.R. S: 1.16. 18 U.S.C. S: 1001 et seq. See also 47 C.F.R. S: 1.17. P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. S: 552a(e)(3). Federal Communications Commission 3 Federal Communications Commission References 1. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-314042A1.pdf 2. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-314042A1.doc
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-314315A1.html
  • shall be subscribed by the declarant as true under penalty of perjury, and dated, in substantially the following form . . . : `I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on (date). (Signature)'." 47 C.F.R. S: 1.16. 18 U.S.C. S: 1001 et seq. See also 47 C.F.R. S: 1.17. P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. S: 552a(e)(3). Federal Communications Commission 4 Federal Communications Commission References 1. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-314315A1.pdf 2. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-314315A1.doc
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-314316A1.html
  • shall be subscribed by the declarant as true under penalty of perjury, and dated, in substantially the following form . . . : `I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on (date). (Signature)'." 47 C.F.R. S: 1.16. 18 U.S.C. S: 1001 et seq. See also 47 C.F.R. S: 1.17. P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. S: 552a(e)(3). Federal Communications Commission 3 Federal Communications Commission References 1. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-314316A1.pdf 2. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-314316A1.doc
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-314320A1.html
  • shall be subscribed by the declarant as true under penalty of perjury, and dated, in substantially the following form . . . : `I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on (date). (Signature)'." 47 C.F.R. S: 1.16. 18 U.S.C. S: 1001 et seq. See also 47 C.F.R. S: 1.17. P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. S: 552a(e)(3). Federal Communications Commission 2 Federal Communications Commission References 1. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-314320A1.pdf 2. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-314320A1.doc
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-314686A1.html
  • shall be subscribed by the declarant as true under penalty of perjury, and dated, in substantially the following form . . . : `I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on (date). (Signature)'." 47 C.F.R. S: 1.16. 18 U.S.C. S: 1001 et seq. See also 47 C.F.R. S: 1.17. P.L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. S: 552a(e)(3). Federal Communications Commission 2 Federal Communications Commission References 1. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-314686A1.pdf 2. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-314686A1.doc
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/News_Releases/nrsbc1016.html http://www.fcc.gov/eb/News_Releases/nrsbc1016.pdf
  • Commission. The Commission also found that SBC's loop qualification system, as it operated when the Commission approved the Kansas/Oklahoma application, did not violate section 271 of the Communications Act. Based on its investigation, however, the Commission did find that SBC appears to be liable for other apparent violations. Specifically, the Commission found that: 1. SBC appears to have violated section 1.17 of the Commission's Rules by intentionally misrepresenting information to the Enforcement Bureau during the investigation. The Commission proposed a fine of $120,000 for this apparent violation. 2. SBC appears to have violated section 1.65 of the Commission's Rules when it failed to notify the Commission in a timely manner that the information in the affidavits was inaccurate. For this, the
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2001/da012591.html http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2001/da012591.pdf
  • FOR FORFEITURE Adopted: November 6, 2001 Released: November 7, 2001 By the Chief, Investigations and Hearings Division, Enforcement Bureau: I. Introduction 1. In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture we find that Northeast Utilities failed to disclose in multiple applications filed with the Commission that it had been convicted of felonies, in apparent willful and repeated violation of Section 1.17 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 1.17. We conclude that that Northeast Utilities is apparently liable for a forfeiture in the amount of $20,000. II. Background 2. On September 27, 1999, Northeast Utilities Service Company, a subsidiary of Northeast Utilities, pleaded guilty to six counts of violating the Clean Water Act. On the same day, Northeast Nuclear Energy Company, another
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2001/fcc01308.html http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2001/fcc01308.pdf
  • of section 1.65 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 1.65; (2) apparently making a misrepresentation or a willful material omission bearing on a matter within the jurisdiction of the Commission in a written statement submitted by SBC in connection with the investigation into the filing of the incorrect affidavits in the Kansas/Oklahoma section 271 proceeding, in apparent violation of section 1.17 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. 1.17; and (3) apparently failing to comply with the terms of a consent decree that resolved an earlier investigation of SBC involving analogous issues and required SBC to train certain employees on Commission rules relating to contacts with the agency.2 3. Based on these findings, we find SBC apparently liable for a forfeiture in
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2002/DA-02-336A1.html
  • ) NAL/Acct. Number: Licensee of Various Land Mobile ) 20023208002 and Microwave Licenses ) FCC Registration Number: 0003-7750-53 FORFEITURE ORDER Adopted: March 11, 2002 Released: March 12, 2002 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: I. INTRODUCTION 1. In this Forfeiture Order, we issue a monetary forfeiture in the amount of $5,500 against Northeast Utilities for having willfully and repeatedly violated Section 1.17 of the Commission's rules.1 The violations relate to Northeast Utilities' failure in three applications filed with the Commission to properly disclose that it had been convicted of felonies. II. BACKGROUND 2. On September 27, 1999, Northeast Utilities Service Company, a subsidiary of Northeast Utilities, pleaded guilty to six counts of violating the Clean Water Act. On the same day, Northeast
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2002/FCC-02-112A1.html
  • Liability for Forfeiture, 7 FCC Rcd 3378, 3379 (Mass Media Bureau 1992) (noting that a forfeiture in the ``full amount . . . allowed by law'' was to be imposed because the company's reply ``included only non-notarized statements . . . although [the Mass Media Bureau] had requested notarized affidavits''). 29 The fact that 18 U.S.C. 1001 and 47 C.F.R. 1.17 require SBC to tell the truth does not, as SBC suggests, render an attestation superfluous. See NAL Response at 16, 28. Requiring submission of an attestation may elicit a higher level of care and attention than the level that answers unaccompanied by verification may prompt. Attestations can be necessary to attain the level of reliability that we require to enforce
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2002/FCC-02-142A1.html
  • who were involved in the preparation and review of the August 6, 2001 letter knew on or around July 16, 2001 that E-OTD-capable handsets would not be available before the initial launch of GSM service in Seattle. 16. The Enforcement Bureau continues to investigate this matter to determine whether AT&T Wireless may have engaged in misrepresentation in violation of Section 1.17 of the Rules.47 The base amount for any forfeiture for a violation of Section 1.17 is $120,000, the statutory maximum.48 In order to expedite any enforcement action that may be appropriate at the conclusion of the Bureau's investigation of this matter, for the limited purposes of this matter, we delegate authority to the Chief, Enforcement Bureau, to issue a Notice
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2002/FCC-02-153A1.html
  • NAL/Acct. No.200132080059 ) FRN Nos. 0004-3051- 24 SBC Communications, Inc. ) 0004- 3335-71 ) 0005-1937- 01 ORDER Adopted: May 22, 2002 Released: May 28, 2002 By the Commission: 1. The Commission has been conducting two investigations into potential violations by SBC Communications, Inc. (``SBC'') of sections 251 and 271 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``the Act''),1 sections 1.17 and 1.65 of the Commission's Rules,2 and the requirements of the SBC/SNET Consent Decree.3 These investigations focused on competitors' access to SBC's operations support systems (``OSS'') and information SBC provided to the Commission as part of its section 271 applications.4 The Commission and SBC have negotiated the terms of a Consent Decree that will terminate these investigations. A copy of
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2002/FCC-02-173A1.html
  • violated Section 220(e) of the Act by not filing true and accurate data in FCC Form 499-A; (k) to determine whether the Publix Companies engaged in a pervasive pattern of misrepresentation or lack of candor; (l) to determine whether the Publix Companies misrepresented or willfully omitted facts in written materials submitted to the Commission, in violation of 47 C.F.R. Section 1.17; (m) to determine whether, with respect to the issues (a) through (l) specified above, the Publix Companies knew or should have known that they were committing such violations, whether they acted with the intention of violating a known duty; and whether they acted negligently, or with gross neglect of a known duty; (n) to determine whether the Publix Companies substantially
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2002/FCC-02-186A1.html
  • of the Commission's rules by failing to disclose certain information in the AT&T Complaint proceeding.13 Because we deny AT&T's claims that Beehive's access revenue-sharing arrangement was unlawful, the condition precedent pled by Beehive has not been satisfied, and thus we dismiss Beehive's claims under sections 201(b), 203, and 228 of the Act. In addition, we deny Beehive's claims under sections 1.17 and 1.729(b) of the Commission's rules, because Beehive has failed to meet its burden of demonstrating that AT&T deliberately failed to disclose material information in the AT&T Complaint proceeding. II. BACKGROUND 4. At all relevant times, Beehive was an incumbent local exchange carrier (``LEC'') located in rural Utah and Nevada that served approximately 700 access lines.14 Beehive provided local exchange
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2002/FCC-02-283A1.html
  • EB-02-TS-018 ) NAL/Acct. No. 200232100002 ) FRN 0003-7665-32 ORDER Adopted: October 8, 2002 Released: October 9, 2002 By the Commission: 1. In this Order, we adopt a Consent Decree terminating the above-captioned proceeding1 regarding possible violations by AT&T Wireless Services, Inc. (``AT&T Wireless'') of the enhanced 911 (``E911'') Phase II provisions of Section 20.18 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''),2 Sections 1.17 and 1.65 of the Rules,3 and the supplemental filing requirement set forth in the Commission order granting AT&T Wireless a waiver of the E911 Phase II rules for its Global System for Mobile Communications/General Packet Radio Service network.4 2. The Commission and AT&T Wireless have negotiated the terms of a Consent Decree that would resolve this matter and terminate the
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2003/DA-03-2598A1.html
  • August 11, 2003 Released: August 12, 2003 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: 1. In this Order, we adopt the attached Consent Decree entered into between the Enforcement Bureau and Ralph H. Tyler (``Tyler''). The Consent Decree terminates an investigation by the Enforcement Bureau into whether Tyler misrepresented facts to, or lacked candor with, the Commission regarding Station KTSH(FM), violated Sections 1.17 and/or 73.1015 of the Commission's rules1 and engaged in related misconduct. 2. The Enforcement Bureau and Tyler have negotiated the terms of a Consent Decree that would resolve this matter and terminate the investigation. A copy of the Consent Decree is attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. 3. Based upon the record before us, and in light of Tyler's
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2003/DA-03-2598A2.html
  • margins will not be preserved in the text version. If you need the complete document, download the Microsoft Word or Adobe Acrobat version. ***************************************************************** CONSENT DECREE I. Introduction 1. The Enforcement Bureau of the Federal Communications Commission and Ralph H. Tyler hereby enter into a Consent Decree resolving conduct by Tyler regarding Station KTSH(FM), Tishomingo, Oklahoma, in violation of Sections 1.17 and/or 73.1015 of the Commission's rules.1 2. For purposes of this Consent Decree, the following definitions shall apply: (a) ``Act'' means the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. 151 et seq.; (b) ``Adopting Order'' means an Order of the Bureau adopting the terms and conditions of this Consent Decree; (c) ``Bureau'' means the FCC's Enforcement Bureau; (d) ``Commission''
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2003/DA-03-2721A1.html
  • (``the Federal Communications Commission reminds parties to our proceedings and their attorneys that our rules prohibit the filing of frivolous pleadings or pleadings filed for the purpose of delay in proceedings before the Commission or its staff.''). 12 See In re Mercury PCS II, LLC, 2000, 15 FCC Rcd 14559, 14563 (2000). 13 Response at 4. 14 See 47 C.F.R. 1.17. 15 Liberty Cable Co., Inc., 15 FCC Rcd 25050, 25071 (2000), recon. denied, 16 FCC Rcd 16105 (2001), citing Swan Creek Communications v. FCC, 39 F.3d 1217, 1222 (D.C. Cir. 1994); Sea Island Broadcasting Corp. v. FCC, 627 F.2d 240, 243 (D.C. Cir. 1980), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 834 (1980). See also Contemporary Media, Inc., et al. v. FCC, 214
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2004/DA-04-2437A1.html
  • Bureau: By: David H. Solomon Chief, Enforcement Bureau For Blackstone~NEY Ultrasonics, Inc.: By: Eugene Phaneuf President Blackstone~NEY Ultrasonics, Inc. COMPLIANCE PLAN I. PERSONNEL AND TRAINING 1. Compliance Officer Blackstone~NEY will appoint a Regulatory Compliance Officer (``Compliance Officer''), who will administer the compliance program described below. The Compliance Officer will also supervise Blackstone~NEY's compliance with Parts 2 and 18 and Section 1.17 of the FCC's Rules and the requirements of the Consent Decree. 2. Written Advisory Within 45 days of the Effective Date of the Consent Decree, the Compliance Officer will send a written advisory on Parts 2 and 18 of the FCC's Rules, Section 1.17 of the FCC's Rules, and the requirements of the Consent Decree to each officer and employee
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2004/DA-04-3569A1.html
  • . . .''). 12 Answer, Exhibit M (Interconnection Agreement) at Part 13.0 (VZ 002153-54). The Interconnection Agreement defines ``Collocation'' as ``an arrangement in which the equipment of [Broadview] is installed and maintained at the premises of Verizon for the purpose of Interconnection with Verizon and access to the unbundled Network Element[s] of Verizon.'' Answer, Exhibit M (Interconnection Agreement) at Part 1.17 (VZ 002101). 13 Answer, Exhibit M (Interconnection Agreement) at Part 13.1 (VZ 002153). The Interconnection Agreement defines ``Tariff'' as ``any applicable federal or state tariff of a Party, as may be amended by the Party from time to time, under which a Party offers a particular service, facility, or arrangement.'' Answer, Exhibit M (Interconnection Agreement) at Part 1.79 (VZ 002108).
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2005/DA-05-1633A1.html
  • package was not mentioned in the Station's promotions about the contest. See October Response at Exhibit 1, 2. Capstar fails to provide any explanation for these opposing statements and has not provided audio tapes or transcripts of the contest advertisements. 22 See Complaint at 1; Initial Response at 1 (attaching contest rules, which state ``prize value: $30,000 (approx.).'' 23 Section 1.17 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 1.17, prohibits licensees from submitting to the Commission written and oral statements of fact that are intentionally incorrect or misleading and written statements of fact that are made without a reasonable basis for believing that the statements of fact are correct and not misleading. In this case, the affidavit of Sarah Hannon, submitted with
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2005/DA-05-1641A1.html
  • had actually paid for Petitioners' airfare. CBS Opposition at 1. We note that this error was contained in the Declaration of Map Marketing Vice President Pat Ranier and relied on by CBS. Petitioners have provided no evidence suggesting that CBS knew or should have known of the error when it submitted the Declaration with its LOI Response. See 47 C.F.R. 1.17 (imposing duty on respondents to have a reasonable basis for material factual statements to the Commission). Accordingly, we deny Petitioners' request that we should impose a sanction against CBS for this error. 20 See Dena Pictures, Inc. et al, Memorandum Opinion and Order, 71 FCC 2d 1402, 1409, 15 (1979) (Commission rejected allegation of a violation of the contest rule
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2005/DA-05-2785A1.html
  • declarant is attesting. All such declarations provided should comply with section 1.16 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 1.16, and be substantially in the form set forth therein. To knowingly and willfully make any false statement or conceal any material fact in reply to this inquiry is punishable by fine or imprisonment. See 18 U.S.C. 1001; see also 47 C.F.R. 1.17. Failure to respond appropriately to a Bureau LOI constitutes a violation of the Communications Act and our rules. See SBC Communications, Inc., Order of Forfeiture, 17 FCC Rcd 7589 (2002); Globcom Inc., Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture and Order, 18 FCC Rcd 19893, n. 36 (2003) ); World Communications Satellite Systems, Inc., Forfeiture Order, 19 FCC Rcd 2718 (Enf.
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2005/FCC-05D-01A1.html
  • 126.) Her explanation for having represented that the stations as the only valuable asset was reasonable if she "was referring to businesses as opposed to real estate property that [her] parents owned." Her explanation is plausible, and she corrected the record. 41. A misrepresentation or lack of candor requires "an actual intent to deceive the Commission." See Amendment of Section 1.17, 18 FCC Rcd 4016, 4020 (2003). "Material" is defined as "important" or "having influence or effect;" and a "material misrepresentation is defined as "one relating to matter which is so substantial or important as to influence the party to whom it is made." 18 FCC Rcd at 4020 n. 4. What is necessary to find in order to have "disqualifying
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2006/DA-06-1646A1.html
  • Satellites FRN No. 0013088984 ) ) NOTICE OF APPARENT LIABILITY FOR FORFEITURE Adopted: August 16, 2006 Released: August 16, 2006 By the Chief, Investigations and Hearings Division, Enforcement Bureau: I. INTRODUCTION 1. In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture ("NAL"), we find that Intelsat North America LLC ("Intelsat"), licensee of various C-band and Ku-band Geostationary Satellites, apparently violated Section 1.17 of the Commission's rules (relating to truthful and accurate statements to the Commission) by making incorrect and/or misleading certifications without a reasonable basis for doing so in an application to relocate one of its satellites. Specifically, Intelsat erroneously certified to the Commission that it was relocating a satellite to 178.0'0 E.L. and that the satellite's operation at that location would
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2006/DA-06-2554A1.html
  • adjustment in a forfeiture. 22. Finally, CRC argues that the proposed forfeiture should be reduced because "CRC has no prior history of noncompliance with applicable FCC regulations." The president of CRC, James Kay, however, does have a history of noncompliance. In a prior proceeding, the Commission found that Kay deliberately withheld material information from the Commission, in violation of Section 1.17 of the Rules, and issued a forfeiture of $10,000 to Kay. Because of Kay's previous noncompliance, we are unable to find that CRC has a history of compliance with the Rules. 23. We have examined CRC's response to the NAL pursuant to the statutory factors above, and in conjunction with the Forfeiture Policy Statement. As a result of our review,
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2006/DA-06-617A1.html
  • No. EB-05-IH-0717 ) KOCH INDUSTRIES, INC. NAL/Acct. No. ) 200632080151 Ultimate Parent Company of Licensees of Various Authorizations in the Private ) FRN No. 0005865258 Land Mobile Radio Services ) ) ORDER Adopted: March 22, 2006 Released: March 23, 2006 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: 1. The Enforcement Bureau has been investigating compliance by Koch Industries, Inc. ("Koch") with Section 1.17 of the Commission's rules, relating to truthful and accurate statements to the Commission in license applications filed by entities of which Koch is the ultimate parent company. 2. The Bureau and Koch have negotiated the terms of a Consent Decree, a copy of which is attached hereto and incorporated by reference. After reviewing the terms of the Consent Decree, we
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2006/DA-06-617A2.html
  • document, download the Microsoft Word or Adobe Acrobat version. ***************************************************************** CONSENT DECREE 1. The Enforcement Bureau of the Federal Communications Commission and Koch Industries, Inc. hereby enter into this Consent Decree for the purpose of resolving the Enforcement Bureau's investigation of compliance by Koch Industries, Inc., and entities of which Koch Industries, Inc. is the ultimate parent company, with Section 1.17 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. S 1.17. 2. For purposes of this Consent Decree, the following definitions shall apply: a. "Act" means the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. S 151 et seq. b. "Adopting Order" means an order of the Bureau, adopting this Consent Decree, without any modifications adverse to Koch. c. "Any" shall be construed
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2006/DA-06-655A1.html
  • All such declarations provided should comply with section 1.16 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. S 1.16, and be substantially in the form set forth therein. To knowingly and willfully make any false statement or conceal any material fact in reply to this inquiry is punishable by fine or imprisonment. See 18 U.S.C. S 1001; see also 47 C.F.R. S 1.17. Failure to respond appropriately to a Bureau LOI constitutes a violation of the Communications Act and our rules. See SBC Communications, Inc., Order of Forfeiture, 17 FCC Rcd 7589 (2002); Globcom Inc., Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture and Order, 18 FCC Rcd 19893, n. 36 (2003) ); World Communications Satellite Systems, Inc., Forfeiture Order, 19 FCC Rcd 2718 (Enf.
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2006/FCC-06-124A1.html
  • to Show Cause, Notice of Opportunity for Hearing, and Hearing Designation Order, 18 FCC Rcd 14938, 14964-65, P101 (2004); Family Broadcasting, Inc (WSTX(AM)/WSTX-FM), Order to Show Cause and Notice of Opportunity for Hearing, 16 FCC Rcd 4330, 4335 P 13, 4337, P 17 (2001) recon denied, 16 FCC Rcd 12810 (2001). 47 C.F.R. S 73.1015. See also 47 C.F.R. S 1.17. 47 U.S.C. SS312, 309(k)(2); Character Policy Statement, 102 FCC 2d 1179 (1986). See Character Policy Statement, 102 FCC 2d at 1210-11, PP 58-62. Id. A false certification may also constitute a misrepresentation. See, e.g., San Francisco Unified School District (KALW(FM)), Hearing Designation Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture, 19 FCC Rcd 13326, 13334, P 19 nn. 40-41 (2004),
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2006/FCC-06-128A1.html
  • the following issues: 1. to determine the effect of Mr. Doty's felony convictions on his qualifications to be and to remain a Commission licensee; 2. to determine the effect of Mr. Doty's felony convictions on the qualifications of CRS to be and to remain a Commission licensee; 3. to determine whether CRS made misrepresentations and/or lacked candor and/or violated Section 1.17 of the Commission's rules regarding the felony convictions of Mr. Doty in any applications filed with the Commission; 4. to determine whether CRS failed to timely amend Commission applications to disclose Mr. Doty's felony convictions, in violation of Section 1.65 of the Commission's rules; 5. to determine whether CRS made false certifications in any applications filed with the Commission; 6.
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2006/FCC-06-13A1.html
  • that, since January of 2000, it imported, marketed and distributed for sale at least 66 different models of digital devices. A listing of these 66 models is included in Attachment A. Behringer further stated that, from January 2000 through April 2004, it manufactured approximately 1.33 million of its digital devices for sale in the United States,14 and actually imported approximately 1.17 million of its digital devices, which it distributed to approximately 2,000 retailers for sale in the United States.15 6. Behringer acknowledged that its audio products are Class B digital devices subject to the Commission's equipment verification and related requirements,16 including the applicable technical standards.17 Behringer also acknowledged that it had not verified compliance of any of the 66 models of
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2007/DA-07-4679A1.html
  • Earth FRN No. 0014170831 Station ) ) FORFEITURE ORDER Adopted: November 19, 2007 Released: November 20, 2007 By the Chief, Investigations and Hearings Division, Enforcement Bureau: I. INTRODUCTION 1. In this Forfeiture Order, we find that C5 Communications, LLC ("C5 Communications" or the "Company"), Applicant for Special Temporary Authority ("STA") to Operate a 1.0 meter Ku-Band Earth Station, violated Section 1.17 of the Federal Communications Commission's (the "Commission" or "FCC") rules by twice using a false name to certify the accuracy of certain matters to the Commission in the STA applications it filed with the Commission. For the reasons explained below, we conclude that C5 Communications is liable for a forfeiture in the amount of seventeen thousand five hundred dollars ($17,500).
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2007/DA-07-4876A1.html
  • in the NAL Account No. Coast and Ground, Land Mobile, and ) 200732080027 Microwave Radio Services ) ) ORDER Adopted: December 6, 2007 Released: December 7, 2007 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: 1. In this Order, we adopt a Consent Decree terminating an investigation by the Enforcement Bureau (the "Bureau") into compliance by BP Exploration (Alaska), Inc. ("BPXA"), with Section 1.17 of the Commission's Rules. 2. The Bureau and BPXA have negotiated the terms of a Consent Decree that would terminate the Bureau's investigation. A copy of the Consent Decree is attached hereto. 3. We have reviewed the terms of the Consent Decree and evaluated the facts before us. We believe that the public interest would be served by approving the
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2007/DA-07-4992A1.html
  • $6,000 forfeiture for violation of Section 72.1216 in a single contest) (forfeiture paid); AMFM Radio Licenses LLC, et al, Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture, 19 FCC Rcd 5005 (2004) (maximum forfeiture imposed for each of multiple indecency rule violations) (forfeiture paid). See 47 U.S.C. S: 503(b). See 47 C.F.R. S:S: 0.111, 0.311 and 1.80. See 47 C.F.R. S:S: 73.1216, 1.17 and 73.1015. See 47 C.F.R. S: 1.1914. For purposes of the forfeiture proceeding initiated by this NAL, Multicultural Radio Broadcasting Licensee, LLC shall be the only party to this proceeding. (Continued from previous page) (continued....) Federal Communications Commission DA 07-4992 1 2 Federal Communications Commission DA 07-4992 References 1. http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4992A1.pdf 2. http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4992A1.doc
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2007/FCC-07-100A1.html
  • Forfeiture ("NAL") proposing a $1,000,000 forfeiture against Behringer for its apparent willful and repeated violation of the equipment marketing restrictions and related requirements. 5. Specifically, the NAL found that since January 2000, Behringer has imported and marketed in the United States 66 models of unauthorized digital audio music devices. Between January 2000 and March 2004, Behringer imported and distributed approximately 1.17 million such devices for sale in the United States. The NAL further found that between April 2004 and February 2005 Behringer continued to import and market unauthorized devices, even though it had previously represented to the Enforcement Bureau in response to the first letter of inquiry ("LOI") that it had initiated compliance measures. In this regard, during the one-year period
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2007/FCC-07-125A1.html
  • have been required under Section 310(d) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended and Section 1.948 of the Commission's Rules. Questions about the corporate composition of PCSI and whether control of the company was transferred without prior Commission consent require further inquiry at hearing, as specified in the Ordering Clauses below. A. Misrepresentation and Lack of Candor 34. Section 1.17 of the Commission's Rules prohibits misrepresentations and lack of candor in Commission filings. "The bedrock requirement for absolute truth and candor from a Commission licensee or from a licensee or applicant is, simply stated, this agency's quintessential regulatory demand." Material misrepresentations to the Commission or an intentional lack of candor with respect to matters affecting an applicant's basic eligibility status
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2007/FCC-07-175A1.html
  • in such circumstances, and it seeks a declaration that Farmers' tariffed rates are "void ab initio," thereby entitling Qwest to a damages award. 27. We decline to rule as Qwest requests. As an initial matter, Qwest contends that factual statements Farmers made to the Commission in support of its tariff filing were "incorrect" and/or "misleading," in violation of Commission rule 1.17(a)(1) and (2), because Farmers failed to disclose its purported plan to increase interstate access volumes. Under the Commission's rules, Farmers was required to report its historical cost and demand figures, which the Commission determined are "likely to be a close and unbiased substitute for prospective data." In fact, the Commission specifically declined to include a requirement that carriers provide any
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2008/DA-08-1920A1.html
  • CO 80021. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Kris Anne Monteith Chief, Enforcement Bureau 47 C.F.R. S: 9.5(b). In a companion decision issued concurrently with this NAL, we propose a forfeiture of $25,000 against Cardinal for willfully providing incorrect material factual information to the Commission without a reasonable basis for believing that the information was correct and accurate in apparent violation of Section 1.17 of the Rules. Cardinal Broadband LLC, Notice of Apparent Liability, DA 08-1921 (Enf. Bur., rel. August 15, 2008). An interconnected VoIP service is a service that: (1) enables real-time, two-way voice communications; (2) requires a broadband connection from the user's location; (3) requires Internet Protocol-compatible customer premises equipment; and (4) permits users generally to receive calls that originate on the
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2008/DA-08-1921A1.html
  • August 15, 2008 Released: August 15, 2008 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: I. introduction 1. In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture ("NAL"), we find Cardinal Broadband, LLC, aka Sovereign Telecommunications, a wholly owned subsidiary of Cardinal Communications, Inc. (hereinafter, "Cardinal"), apparently liable for a forfeiture in the amount of twenty-five thousand dollars ($25,000) for willful violation of Section 1.17(a)(2) of the Commission's Rules ("Rules"). The noted apparent violation involves Cardinal's provision of incorrect material factual information to the Commission without a reasonable basis for believing that the information was correct and accurate. II. BACKGROUND 2. On July 13, 2007, the Commission received a complaint alleging that Cardinal, an interconnected Voice over Internet Protocol ("VoIP") service provider, was not providing
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2008/DA-08-410A1.html
  • Partnership, Memorandum Opinion and Order, 17 FCC Rcd 21861, 21863-64 (2002) ("Eure"); MTD, Inc., Memorandum Opinion and Order, 6 FCC Rcd 34, 35 (1991); Wagenvoord Broadcasting Co., Memorandum Opinion and Order, 35 FCC 2d 361 (1972). See Eure, 17 FCC Rcd at 21863-64; Triad Broadcasting Company, Inc., Memorandum Opinion and Order, 96 FCC 2d 1235, 1244 (1984). See 47 C.F.R. S:1.17. See Southern California, 7 FCC Rcd at 3455 (a licensee's "frank" response to a letter of inquiry did not warrant a downward adjustment as "complete candor" is required). 47 C.F.R. S:S: 0.111, 0.311, 1.80(f)(4). (Continued from previous page) (continued....) Federal Communications Commission DA 08-410 4 Federal Communications Commission DA 08-410 References 1. http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-410A1.pdf 2. http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-410A1.doc
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2008/DA-08-563A1.html
  • for a downward adjustment in a forfeiture. Finally, the Region found that, contrary to CRC's request for a reduction based on CRC's history of compliance with the Rules, the president of CRC, James Kay, had a history of noncompliance. Specifically, in a prior proceeding, the Commission found that Kay deliberately withheld material information from the Commission, in violation of Section 1.17 of the Rules, and issued a forfeiture of $10,000 to Kay. Because of Kay's previous noncompliance, the Region declined to find that CRC has a history of compliance with the Rules. III. DISCUSSION 14. Reconsideration is appropriate only where the petitioner either demonstrates a material error or omission in the underlying order or raises additional facts not known or not
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2008/DA-08-778A1.html
  • Sprint engaged in unreasonable and discriminatory practices in violation of sections 201(b) and 202 of the Communications Act by refusing to provide service through the toll-free telephone numbers 800-AMERICA and 888-AMERICA; and (2) Sprint engaged in misrepresentation to the Federal Communications Commission in its response to DeMoss's informal complaint, in violation of 18 U.S.C. section 1001 and 47 C.F.R. section 1.17. DeMoss further requested a separate damages proceeding under 47 C.F.R. section 1.722(d). III. DISCUSSION 1. It is well established that the complainant has the burden of proof in a formal complaint proceeding under section 208 of the Act. Thus, to prevail, a complainant must demonstrate by a preponderance of the evidence that the alleged violation of the Act or the
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2009/DA-09-2584A1.html
  • Released: December 14, 2009 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: 1. In this Order, we adopt the attached Consent Decree entered into between the Enforcement Bureau and BNSF Railway Company ("BNSF"). The Consent Decree terminates an investigation by the Bureau of BNSF's compliance with Section 310(d) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, relating to assignments of licenses, and Section 1.17 of the Commission's Rules, relating to truthful statements to the Commission. 2. The Bureau and BNSF have negotiated the terms of the Consent Decree that resolve this matter. A copy of the Consent Decree is attached hereto and incorporated by reference. 3. After reviewing the terms of the Consent Decree and evaluating the facts before us, we find that the
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2009/DA-09-2584A2.html
  • No. 0004772877 ) CONSENT DECREE 1. The Enforcement Bureau of the Federal Communications Commission and BNSF Railway Company, by their authorized representatives, hereby enter into this Consent Decree for the purpose of resolving the Enforcement Bureau's investigation of compliance by BNSF Railway Company with Section 310(d) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. S: 310(d), and Sections 1.17 and 1.948 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. S:S: 1.17, 1.948. I. DEFINITIONS 2. For purposes of this Consent Decree, the following definitions shall apply: a. "Act" means the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. S: 151 et seq. b. "Adopting Order" means an order of the Bureau adopting this Consent Decree without any modifications adverse to BNSF
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2009/DA-09-51A1.html
  • whether or when it was actually utilized. Id. Being uncertain whether the purported revision was ever substituted for the earlier promotional text, we will not consider PRC's broadcast of any of the post-September 2004 Rockin' Tomato Pizza Co. announcements in conjunction with our determination of the forfeiture amount. See generally, November 17th Reply. See id.; see also 47 C.F.R. S: 1.17. See September 13th Response at 5-6. See id. See id. See 47 U.S.C. S: 503(b); 47 C.F.R S: 1.80. The Commission's Forfeiture Policy Statement and Amendment of Section 1.80 of the Rules to Incorporate the Forfeiture Guidelines, 12 FCC Rcd 17087, 17115 (1997) ("Forfeiture Policy Statement"), recon. denied 15 FCC Rcd 303 (1999); 47 C.F.R. S: 1.80(b). 47 U.S.C. S:
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2009/DA-09-79A1.html
  • in the Section 503(b) context. See, e.g., Southern California Broadcasting Co., Memorandum Opinion and Order, 6 FCC Rcd 4387, 4387-88 P: 5 (1991) ("Southern California Broadcasting"). 47 U.S.C. S: 154(i). 47 U.S.C. S: 154(j). 47 U.S.C. S: 403. 47 C.F.R. S: 76.939 ("Cable operators shall comply with ... the Commission's requests for information, orders, and decisions."). See 47 C.F.R. S: 1.17. See, e.g., SBC Communications, Inc., Forfeiture Order, 17 FCC Rcd 7589, 7599-7600 P:P: 23-28 (ordering $100,000 forfeiture for egregious and intentional failure to certify the response to a Bureau inquiry) ("SBC Forfeiture Order"); Globcom, Inc., Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture and Order, 18 FCC Rcd 19893, 19898 n. 36 (2003) (noting delayed response to an LOI is considered dilatory
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2009/DA-09-80A1.html
  • in the Section 503(b) context. See, e.g., Southern California Broadcasting Co., Memorandum Opinion and Order, 6 FCC Rcd 4387, 4387-88 P: 5 (1991) ("Southern California Broadcasting"). 47 U.S.C. S: 154(i). 47 U.S.C. S: 154(j). 47 U.S.C. S: 403. 47 C.F.R. S: 76.939 ("Cable operators shall comply with ... the Commission's requests for information, orders, and decisions."). See 47 C.F.R. S: 1.17. See, e.g., SBC Communications, Inc., Forfeiture Order, 17 FCC Rcd 7589, 7599-7600 P:P: 23-28 (2002) (ordering $100,000 forfeiture for egregious and intentional failure to certify the response to a Bureau inquiry) ("SBC Forfeiture Order"); Digital Antenna, Inc., Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture and Order, 23 FCC Rcd 7600, 7602 (Spectr. Enf. Div., Enf. Bur. 2008) (proposing $11,000 forfeiture for
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2009/DA-09-81A1.html
  • in the Section 503(b) context. See, e.g., Southern California Broadcasting Co., Memorandum Opinion and Order, 6 FCC Rcd 4387, 4387-88 P: 5 (1991) ("Southern California Broadcasting"). 47 U.S.C. S: 154(i). 47 U.S.C. S: 154(j). 47 U.S.C. S: 403. 47 C.F.R. S: 76.939 ("Cable operators shall comply with ... the Commission's requests for information, orders, and decisions."). See 47 C.F.R. S: 1.17. See, e.g., SBC Communications, Inc., Forfeiture Order, 17 FCC Rcd 7589, 7599-7600 P:P: 23-28 (2002) (ordering $100,000 forfeiture for egregious and intentional failure to certify the response to a Bureau inquiry) ("SBC Forfeiture Order"); Digital Antenna, Inc., Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture and Order, 23 FCC Rcd 7600, 7602 (Spectr. Enf. Div., Enf. Bur. 2008) (proposing $11,000 forfeiture for
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2009/DA-09-82A1.html
  • in the Section 503(b) context. See, e.g., Southern California Broadcasting Co., Memorandum Opinion and Order, 6 FCC Rcd 4387, 4387-88 P: 5 (1991) ("Southern California Broadcasting"). 47 U.S.C. S: 154(i). 47 U.S.C. S: 154(j). 47 U.S.C. S: 403. 47 C.F.R. S: 76.939 ("Cable operators shall comply with ... the Commission's requests for information, orders, and decisions."). See 47 C.F.R. S: 1.17. See, e.g., SBC Communications, Inc., Forfeiture Order, 17 FCC Rcd 7589, 7599-7600 P:P: 23-28 (2002) (ordering $100,000 forfeiture for egregious and intentional failure to certify the response to a Bureau inquiry) ("SBC Forfeiture Order"); Digital Antenna, Inc., Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture and Order, 23 FCC Rcd 7600, 7602 (Spectr. Enf. Div., Enf. Bur. 2008) (proposing $11,000 forfeiture for
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2009/DA-09-83A1.html
  • in the Section 503(b) context. See, e.g., Southern California Broadcasting Co., Memorandum Opinion and Order, 6 FCC Rcd 4387, 4387-88 P: 5 (1991) ("Southern California Broadcasting"). 47 U.S.C. S: 154(i). 47 U.S.C. S: 154(j). 47 U.S.C. S: 403. 47 C.F.R. S: 76.939 ("Cable operators shall comply with ... the Commission's requests for information, orders, and decisions."). See 47 C.F.R. S: 1.17. See, e.g., SBC Communications, Inc., Forfeiture Order, 17 FCC Rcd 7589, 7599-7600 P:P: 23-28 (ordering $100,000 forfeiture for egregious and intentional failure to certify the response to a Bureau inquiry) ("SBC Forfeiture Order"); Digital Antenna, Inc., Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture and Order, 23 FCC Rcd 7600, 7602 (Spectr. Enf. Div., Enf. Bur. 2008) (proposing $11,000 forfeiture for failure
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2009/DA-09-84A1.html
  • in the Section 503(b) context. See, e.g., Southern California Broadcasting Co., Memorandum Opinion and Order, 6 FCC Rcd 4387, 4387-88 P: 5 (1991) ("Southern California Broadcasting"). 47 U.S.C. S: 154(i). 47 U.S.C. S: 154(j). 47 U.S.C. S: 403. 47 C.F.R. S: 76.939 ("Cable operators shall comply with ... the Commission's requests for information, orders, and decisions."). See 47 C.F.R. S: 1.17. See, e.g., SBC Communications, Inc., Forfeiture Order, 17 FCC Rcd 7589, 7599-7600 P:P: 23-28 (ordering $100,000 forfeiture for egregious and intentional failure to certify the response to a Bureau inquiry) ("SBC Forfeiture Order"); Digital Antenna, Inc., Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture and Order, 23 FCC Rcd 7600, 7602 (Spectr. Enf. Div., Enf. Bur. 2008) (proposing $11,000 forfeiture for failure
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2009/DA-09-85A1.html
  • in the Section 503(b) context. See, e.g., Southern California Broadcasting Co., Memorandum Opinion and Order, 6 FCC Rcd 4387, 4387-88 P: 5 (1991) ("Southern California Broadcasting"). 47 U.S.C. S: 154(i). 47 U.S.C. S: 154(j). 47 U.S.C. S: 403. 47 C.F.R. S: 76.939 ("Cable operators shall comply with ... the Commission's requests for information, orders, and decisions."). See 47 C.F.R. S: 1.17. See, e.g., SBC Communications, Inc., Forfeiture Order, 17 FCC Rcd 7589, 7599-7600 P:P: 23-28 (2002) (ordering $100,000 forfeiture for egregious and intentional failure to certify the response to a Bureau inquiry) ("SBC Forfeiture Order"); Digital Antenna, Inc., Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture and Order, 23 FCC Rcd 7600, 7602 (Spectr. Enf. Div., Enf. Bur. 2008) (proposing $11,000 forfeiture for
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2009/DA-09-95A1.html
  • in the Section 503(b) context. See, e.g., Southern California Broadcasting Co., Memorandum Opinion and Order, 6 FCC Rcd 4387, 4387-88 P: 5 (1991) ("Southern California Broadcasting"). 47 U.S.C. S: 154(i). 47 U.S.C. S: 154(j). 47 U.S.C. S: 403. 47 C.F.R. S: 76.939 ("Cable operators shall comply with ... the Commission's requests for information, orders, and decisions."). See 47 C.F.R. S: 1.17. See, e.g., SBC Communications, Inc., Forfeiture Order, 17 FCC Rcd 7589, 7599-7600 P:P: 23-28 (2002) (ordering $100,000 forfeiture for egregious and intentional failure to certify the response to a Bureau inquiry) ("SBC Forfeiture Order"); Digital Antenna, Inc., Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture and Order, 23 FCC Rcd 7600, 7602 (Spectr. Enf. Div., Enf. Bur. 2008) (proposing $11,000 forfeiture for
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2010/DA-10-1268A1.html
  • Section II. Adjustment Criteria for Section 503 Forfeitures. See The Commission's Forfeiture Policy Statement and Amendment of Section 1.80 of the Rules to Incorporate the Forfeiture Guidelines, Report and Order, 12 FCC Rcd 17087 (1997), recon. denied, 15 FCC Rcd 303 (1999) ("Forfeiture Policy Statement"). Forfeiture Policy Statement, 12 FCC Rcd at 17099 P: 22. See id. Amendment of Section 1.17 of the Commission's Rules Concerning Truthful Statements to the Commission, Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, 17 FCC Rcd 3296, 3297 (2002). See also Amendment of Section 1.17 of the Commission's Rules Concerning Truthful Statements to the Commission Report and Order, 18 FCC Rcd 4016, 4021 (2003), recon. denied, Memorandum Opinion and Order, 19 FCC Rcd 5790, further recon. denied, Memorandum Opinion
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2010/DA-10-1975A1.html
  • File No. EB-09-SE-242; Provision of Incorrect Material Factual Information in a Commission Investigation Dear Mr. McCormack: This is an official CITATION, issued pursuant to section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Communications Act"), to Phonejammer.com ("Phonejammer") for providing incorrect, material factual information to the Spectrum Enforcement Division ("Division") of the Enforcement Bureau ("Bureau") in violation of section 1.17(a)(2) of the Commission's rules ("Rules"). Specifically, in response to recent Commission inquiries, Phonejammer claimed that it does not market, and has not shipped or distributed, radio frequency devices designed to intentionally interfere with licensed cellular and Personal Communications Services ("PCS") ("phone jammers") to consumers in the United States. However, these statements are flatly contradicted by record evidence that, as recently
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2010/DA-10-2187A1.html
  • with the Commission. 9. Under the Privacy Act of 1974, any statement or information provided by you may be used by the Commission to determine if further enforcement action is required. Any knowingly or willfully false statement, or concealment of any material fact, made in reply to this Citation is punishable by fine or imprisonment. Please also note that Section 1.17 of the Rules requires that you provide truthful and accurate statements to the Commission. VI. CONTACT INFORMATION 10. The closest FCC Office is the Los Angeles District Office in Cerritos, CA. You may contact this office by telephone, 562-860-7474, to schedule a personal interview, which must take place within thirty (30) days after the release date of this Citation. 11.
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2010/DA-10-2188A1.html
  • with the Commission. 9. Under the Privacy Act of 1974, any statement or information provided by you may be used by the Commission to determine if further enforcement action is required. Any knowingly or willfully false statement, or concealment of any material fact, made in reply to this Citation is punishable by fine or imprisonment. Please also note that Section 1.17 of the Rules requires that you provide truthful and accurate statements to the Commission. VI. CONTACT INFORMATION 10. The closest FCC Office is the Los Angeles District Office in Cerritos, CA. You may contact this office by telephone, 562-860-7474, to schedule a personal interview, which must take place within thirty (30) days after the release date of this Citation. 11.
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2010/DA-10-2189A1.html
  • with the Commission. 9. Under the Privacy Act of 1974, any statement or information provided by you may be used by the Commission to determine if further enforcement action is required. Any knowingly or willfully false statement, or concealment of any material fact, made in reply to this Citation is punishable by fine or imprisonment. Please also note that Section 1.17 of the Rules requires that you provide truthful and accurate statements to the Commission. VI. CONTACT INFORMATION 10. The closest FCC Office is the Los Angeles District Office in Cerritos, CA. You may contact this office by telephone, 562-860-7474, to schedule a personal interview, which must take place within thirty (30) days after the release date of this Citation. 11.
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2010/DA-10-2190A1.html
  • with the Commission. 9. Under the Privacy Act of 1974, any statement or information provided by you may be used by the Commission to determine if further enforcement action is required. Any knowingly or willfully false statement, or concealment of any material fact, made in reply to this Citation is punishable by fine or imprisonment. Please also note that Section 1.17 of the Rules requires that you provide truthful and accurate statements to the Commission. VI. CONTACT INFORMATION 10. The closest FCC Office is the Denver Field Office in Denver, Colorado. You may contact this office by telephone, (303)231-5212, to schedule a personal interview, which must take place within twenty (20) days after the release date of this Citation. 11. Reasonable
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2010/DA-10-2191A1.html
  • with the Commission. 9. Under the Privacy Act of 1974, any statement or information provided by you may be used by the Commission to determine if further enforcement action is required. Any knowingly or willfully false statement, or concealment of any material fact, made in reply to this Citation is punishable by fine or imprisonment. Please also note that Section 1.17 of the Rules requires that you provide truthful and accurate statements to the Commission. VI. CONTACT INFORMATION 10. The closest FCC Office is the Denver Field Office in Denver, Colorado. You may contact this office by telephone, (303)231-5212, to schedule a personal interview, which must take place within twenty (20) days after the release date of this Citation. 11. Reasonable
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2010/DA-10-2192A1.html
  • with the Commission. 9. Under the Privacy Act of 1974, any statement or information provided by you may be used by the Commission to determine if further enforcement action is required. Any knowingly or willfully false statement, or concealment of any material fact, made in reply to this Citation is punishable by fine or imprisonment. Please also note that Section 1.17 of the Rules requires that you provide truthful and accurate statements to the Commission. VI. CONTACT INFORMATION 10. The closest FCC Office is the Denver Field Office in Denver, Colorado. You may contact this office by telephone, (303)231-5212, to schedule a personal interview, which must take place within twenty (20) days after the release date of this Citation. 11. Reasonable
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2010/DA-10-2193A1.html
  • with the Commission. 9. Under the Privacy Act of 1974, any statement or information provided by you may be used by the Commission to determine if further enforcement action is required. Any knowingly or willfully false statement, or concealment of any material fact, made in reply to this Citation is punishable by fine or imprisonment. Please also note that Section 1.17 of the Rules requires that you provide truthful and accurate statements to the Commission. VI. CONTACT INFORMATION 10. The closest FCC Office is the Denver Field Office in Denver, Colorado. You may contact this office by telephone, (303)231-5212, to schedule a personal interview, which must take place within twenty (20) days after the release date of this Citation. 11. Reasonable
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2010/DA-10-2194A1.html
  • with the Commission. 9. Under the Privacy Act of 1974, any statement or information provided by you may be used by the Commission to determine if further enforcement action is required. Any knowingly or willfully false statement, or concealment of any material fact, made in reply to this Citation is punishable by fine or imprisonment. Please also note that Section 1.17 of the Rules requires that you provide truthful and accurate statements to the Commission. VI. CONTACT INFORMATION 10. The closest FCC Office is the Denver Field Office in Denver, Colorado. You may contact this office by telephone, (303)231-5212, to schedule a personal interview, which must take place within twenty (20) days after the release date of this Citation. 11. Reasonable
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2010/DA-10-2195A1.html
  • with the Commission. 9. Under the Privacy Act of 1974, any statement or information provided by you may be used by the Commission to determine if further enforcement action is required. Any knowingly or willfully false statement, or concealment of any material fact, made in reply to this Citation is punishable by fine or imprisonment. Please also note that Section 1.17 of the Rules requires that you provide truthful and accurate statements to the Commission. VI. CONTACT INFORMATION 10. The closest FCC Office is the Denver Field Office in Denver, Colorado. You may contact this office by telephone, (303)231-5212, to schedule a personal interview, which must take place within twenty (20) days after the release date of this Citation. 11. Reasonable
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2010/DA-10-2220A1.html
  • with the Commission. 10. Under the Privacy Act of 1974, any statement or information provided by you may be used by the Commission to determine if further enforcement action is required. Any knowingly or willfully false statement, or concealment of any material fact, made in reply to this Citation is punishable by fine or imprisonment. Please also note that Section 1.17 of the Rules requires that you provide truthful and accurate statements to the Commission. V. CONTACT INFORMATION 11. The closest FCC Office is the Atlanta Office, in Duluth, Georgia. You may contact Neal McNeil by telephone, 202-418-1160, to schedule a personal interview, which must take place within thirty (30) days after the release date of this Citation. 12. Reasonable accommodations
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2010/DA-10-2240A1.html
  • with the Commission. 11. Under the Privacy Act of 1974, any statement or information provided by you may be used by the Commission to determine if further enforcement action is required. Any knowingly or willfully false statement, or concealment of any material fact, made in reply to this Citation is punishable by fine or imprisonment. Please also note that Section 1.17 of the Rules requires that you provide truthful and accurate statements to the Commission. V. CONTACT INFORMATION 12. The closest FCC Office is the Seattle Field Office in Kirkland, Washington. You may contact Salomon Satche by telephone, (301) 725-1996, to schedule a personal interview, which must take place within thirty (30) days after the release date of this Citation. You
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2010/DA-10-2295A1.html
  • with the Commission. 11. Under the Privacy Act of 1974, any statement or information provided by you may be used by the Commission to determine if further enforcement action is required. Any knowingly or willfully false statement, or concealment of any material fact, made in reply to this Citation is punishable by fine or imprisonment. Please also note that Section 1.17 of the Rules requires that you provide truthful and accurate statements to the Commission. V. CONTACT INFORMATION 12. The closest FCC Office is the Seattle Field Office in Kirkland, Washington. You may contact Salomon Satche by telephone, (301) 725-1996, to schedule a personal interview, which must take place within thirty (30) days after the release date of this Citation. You
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2010/DA-10-669A1.html
  • intentional radiator is defined by Section 15.3(o) of the Rules, 47 C.F.R. S: 15.3(o), as "[a] device that intentionally generates and emits radio frequency energy by radiation or induction." 47 C.F.R. S:S: 2.1031-2.1060. 47 C.F.R. S: 15.201(b). 47 C.F.R. S: 2.803(g). 47 U.S.C. S: 333. We note that although the Citation did not specifically address Phonejammer's behavior as a Section 1.17(a)(2) violation, 47 C.F.R. S: 1.17(a)(2), the Citation emphasized that evidence gathered from Phonejammer's website clearly contradicted Phonejammer's claim that it did not market its phone jammers to individuals in the United States. Moreover, the Citation noted that Phonejammer failed to attest to the truth and accuracy of the information in its response. We will issue a separate Citation to Phonejammer
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2010/DA-10-995A1.html
  • the Bureau is sending letters of inquiry to all licensees that air Fox Television Network programming. We take this step to advance the investigation. It should not be construed as a concession that our initial inquiry to Fox was misdirected. 47 U.S.C. S: 154(i). 47 U.S.C. S: 154(j). 47 U.S.C. S: 403. 47 C.F.R. S: 73.1015. See 47 C.F.R. S: 1.17. See, e.g., SBC Communications Order, 17 FCC Rcd at 7599-7600 P:P: 23-28 (ordering $100,000 forfeiture for egregious and intentional failure to certify the response to a Bureau inquiry); Digital Antenna, Inc., Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture and Order, 23 FCC Rcd 7600, 7602 (Spectrum Enforcement Div., Enf. Bur. 2008) (proposing $11,000 forfeiture for failure to provide a complete response
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2011/DA-11-1111A1.html
  • with the Commission. 7. Under the Privacy Act of 1974, any statement or information provided by you may be used by the Commission to determine if further enforcement action is required. Any knowingly or willfully false statement, or concealment of any material fact, made in reply to this Citation is punishable by fine or imprisonment. Please also note that section 1.17 of the Rules requires that you provide truthful and accurate statements to the Commission. V. CONTACT INFORMATION 8. The closest FCC Office is the New York Office in New York. You may contact Dan Noel by telephone, (212) 337-1865, to schedule a personal interview, which must take place within thirty (30) days after the release date of this Citation. You
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2011/DA-11-1164A1.html
  • the Commission. 13. Under the Privacy Act of 1974, any statement or information provided by New Generation may be used by the Commission to determine if further enforcement action is required. Any knowingly or willfully false statement, or concealment of any material fact, made in reply to this Citation is punishable by fine or imprisonment. Please also note that section 1.17 of the Rules requires that New Generation provide truthful and accurate statements to the Commission. V. CONTACT INFORMATION 14. The closest FCC Office is the Detroit Office in Farmington Hills, Michigan. Please contact Celia Lewis by telephone, 202-418-7456, if New Generation wishes to schedule a personal interview. The interview should take place within thirty (30) days after the release date
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2011/DA-11-1165A1.html
  • with the Commission. 13. Under the Privacy Act of 1974, we also inform Sound Around that the Commission's staff will use all relevant material information before it, including information disclosed in its interview or written statement, to determine if further enforcement action is required to ensure compliance with the Communications Act and the Commission's Rules. Please also note that section 1.17 of the Rules requires that Sound Around provide truthful and accurate statements to the Commission. In addition, the knowing and willful making of any false statement, or the concealment of any material fact, in reply to this Citation is punishable by fine or imprisonment. IV. contact information 14. The closest FCC office is the New York Field Office in New
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2011/DA-11-125A1.html
  • with the Commission. 12. Under the Privacy Act of 1974, any statement or information provided by you may be used by the Commission to determine if further enforcement action is required. Any knowingly or willfully false statement or concealment of any material fact, made in reply to this Citation is punishable by fine or imprisonment. Please also note that section 1.17 of the Rules requires that you provide truthful and accurate statements to the Commission. V. CONTACT INFORMATION 13. The closest FCC Office is the Los Angeles Field Office, in Cerritos, California. You may contact Samantha Peoples by telephone, 202-418-1101, to schedule a personal interview, which must take place within thirty (30) days after the release date of this Citation. You
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2011/DA-11-135A1.html
  • with the Commission. 12. Under the Privacy Act of 1974, any statement or information provided by you may be used by the Commission to determine if further enforcement action is required. Any knowingly or willfully false statement or concealment of any material fact, made in reply to this Citation is punishable by fine or imprisonment. Please also note that section 1.17 of the Rules requires that you provide truthful and accurate statements to the Commission. V. CONTACT INFORMATION 13. The closest FCC office is the New York District Office, in New York, NY. You may contact Jennifer Burton by telephone, 202-418-1160, to schedule a personal interview, which must take place within thirty (30) days after the release date of this Citation.
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2011/DA-11-1536A1.html
  • EB-11-IH-0734 VERMONT TELEPHONE COMPANY, INC. ) NAL/Acct. No.: 201232080004 Participant in Auction No. 86 ) FRN: 0005209374 ) NOTICE OF APPARENT LIABILITY FOR FORFEITURE Adopted: October 14, 2011 Released: October 14, 2011 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: I. INTRODUCTION 1. In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture ("NAL"), we find that Vermont Telephone Company, Inc. ("VTel"), apparently violated sections 1.17 and 1.65 of the Commission's rules ("Rules") by willfully and repeatedly failing to submit accurate revenue information to the Commission and by failing to maintain the continuing accuracy of its application in connection with its participation in Auction No. 86. Based on our review of the facts and circumstances surrounding this matter, and for the reasons discussed below, we find
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2011/DA-11-1661A1.html
  • Commission. 16. Under the Privacy Act of 1974, any statement or information provided by an Online Vendor may be used by the Commission to determine if further enforcement action is required. Any knowingly or willfully false statement or concealment of any material fact made in reply to this Citation is punishable by fine or imprisonment. Please also note that section 1.17 of the Rules requires that truthful and accurate statements be provided to the Commission. V. CONTACT INFORMATION 17. For purposes of scheduling a personal interview, the closest FCC office for each Online Vendor is included in Appendix A to this Citation. An Online Vendor may contact the Spectrum Enforcement Division by telephone, 202-418-1160, to schedule an interview, which must take
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2011/DA-11-1720A1.html
  • with the Commission. 12. Under the Privacy Act of 1974, any statement or information provided by you may be used by the Commission to determine if further enforcement action is required. Any knowingly or willfully false statement, or concealment of any material fact, made in reply to this Citation is punishable by fine or imprisonment. Please also note that section 1.17 of the Rules requires that you provide truthful and accurate statements to the Commission. VI. CONTACT INFORMATION 13. The closest FCC Office is the San Juan Office in San Juan, Puerto Rico. Spy Gallery may contact Reuben Jusino by telephone, 787-306-1193, to schedule a personal interview, which must take place within thirty (30) calendar days after the release date of
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2011/DA-11-1786A1.html
  • in the future. 9. Under the Privacy Act of 1974, any statement or information provided by you may be used by the Commission to determine if further enforcement action is required. Any knowingly or willfully false statement, or concealment of any material fact, made in reply to this Citation is punishable by fine or imprisonment. Please also note that Section 1.17 of the Rules requires that you provide truthful and accurate statements to the Commission. VI. CONTACT INFORMATION 10. The closest FCC Office is the Seattle Field Office in Kirkland, Washington. You may contact this office by telephone, (360)696-6707, to schedule a personal interview, which must take place within twenty (20) days after the release date of this Citation. All written
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2011/DA-11-1787A1.html
  • in the future. 9. Under the Privacy Act of 1974, any statement or information provided by you may be used by the Commission to determine if further enforcement action is required. Any knowingly or willfully false statement, or concealment of any material fact, made in reply to this Citation is punishable by fine or imprisonment. Please also note that Section 1.17 of the Rules requires that you provide truthful and accurate statements to the Commission. VI. CONTACT INFORMATION 10. The closest FCC Office is the Seattle Field Office in Kirkland, Washington. You may contact this office by telephone, (360)696-6707, to schedule a personal interview, which must take place within twenty (20) days after the release date of this Citation. All written
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2011/DA-11-184A1.html
  • Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau: I. INTRODUCTION 1. In this Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture ("NAL"), we find Cricket Communications, Inc. ("Cricket"), licensee of common carrier fixed point-to-point microwave stations, call signs WQJE535, Midway, Kentucky, and WQJF544, Frankfort, Kentucky, apparently liable for a forfeiture in the amount of twenty thousand dollars ($20,000) for willful violation of section 1.17(a)(2) of the Commission's rules ("Rules"). The noted violation involves Cricket's provision of incorrect material factual information to the Commission regarding the construction of station WQJE535 without a reasonable basis for believing that the information was correct and accurate. We also admonish Cricket for operating stations WQJE535 and WQJF544 for seven months prior to obtaining Commission authority in violation of section
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2011/DA-11-246A1.html
  • is assigned by the grantee or applicant. 47 U.S.C. S:S: 302a(b), 333. 47 C.F.R. S: 2.931. 47 U.S.C. S:S: 302a(b), 333; 47 C.F.R. S:S: 2.803, 2.907(b), 2.931, 2.932, 2.936, 2.946. We are simultaneously issuing a citation to Share Enterprises, the company that marketed the TxTStopper(TM) device in the United States, for violations of sections 302(b) of the Act and sections 1.17 and 2.803 of the Rules. See Share Enterprises Unlimited, Inc., Citation, DA 11-247, February 9, 2011. TxTStopper(TM) website, at http://www.txtstopper.com/cms (visited June 29, 2010 and October 18, 2010); see also TxTStopper on CNN at http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=io8AtlGRjpQ. See id. at http://www.txtstopper.com/cms/content/faqs (visited June 29, 2010 and October 18, 2010). See id. at http://www.txtstopper.com/cms/ (Testimonials from Tina S., Atlanta, GA ("With TxTStopper(TM) I
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2011/DA-11-247A1.html
  • 1934, as amended ("Communications Act"), to Share Enterprises Unlimited, Inc. ("Share") for marketing unauthorized radio frequency devices in the United States in violation of section 302(b) of the Communications Act, and section 2.803 of the Commission's rules ("Rules"), and for providing incorrect, material factual information to the Spectrum Enforcement Division ("Division") of the Enforcement Bureau ("Bureau") in violation of section 1.17(a)(2) of the Rules. 2. Share should take immediate steps to come into compliance and to avoid any recurrence of this misconduct. As explained below and as provided in the Communications Act, future violations of the Rules in this regard may subject your company to substantial monetary penalties, seizure of equipment, and criminal sanctions. We also direct Share to supplement its
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2011/DA-11-248A1.html
  • with the Commission. 15. Under the Privacy Act of 1974, any statement or information provided by you may be used by the Commission to determine if further enforcement action is required. Any knowingly or willfully false statement or concealment of any material fact, made in reply to this Citation is punishable by fine or imprisonment. Please also note that section 1.17 of the Rules requires that you provide truthful and accurate statements to the Commission. V. Contact Information 16. The closest FCC Office is the Seattle District Office, in Kirkland, Washington. Please call Katherine Power at 202-418-0919 if you wish to schedule a personal interview, which must take place within thirty (30) days after the release of this Citation. You should
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2011/DA-11-408A1.html
  • with the Commission. 10. Under the Privacy Act of 1974, any statement or information provided by you may be used by the Commission to determine if further enforcement action is required. Any knowingly or willfully false statement, or concealment of any material fact, made in reply to this Citation is punishable by fine or imprisonment. Please also note that section 1.17 of the rules requires that you provide truthful and accurate statements to the Commission. V. CONTACT INFORMATION 11. The closest FCC Office is the Los Angeles Office in Cerritos, California. You may contact the Los Angeles Office by telephone, (562) 860-7474, to schedule a personal interview, which must take place within thirty (30) days after the release date of this
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2011/DA-11-47A1.html
  • in the future. 9. Under the Privacy Act of 1974, any statement or information provided by you may be used by the Commission to determine if further enforcement action is required. Any knowingly or willfully false statement, or concealment of any material fact, made in reply to this Citation is punishable by fine or imprisonment. Please also note that Section 1.17 of the Rules requires that you provide truthful and accurate statements to the Commission. VI. CONTACT INFORMATION 10. The closest FCC Office is the Seattle Field Office in Kirkland, Washington. You may contact this office by telephone, (360)696-6707, to schedule a personal interview, which must take place within twenty (20) days after the release date of this Citation. All written
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2011/DA-11-550A1.html
  • with the Commission. 9. Under the Privacy Act of 1974, any statement or information provided by you may be used by the Commission to determine if further enforcement action is required. Any knowingly or willfully false statement, or concealment of any material fact, made in reply to this Citation is punishable by fine or imprisonment. Please also note that section 1.17 of the Rules requires that you provide truthful and accurate statements to the Commission. VI. CONTACT INFORMATION 10. The closest FCC Office is the Atlanta Field Office in Duluth, GA. You may contact this office by telephone, (770)935-3370, to schedule a personal interview, which must take place within twenty (20) days after the release date of this Citation. 11. Reasonable
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2011/DA-11-5A1.html
  • with the Commission. 10. Under the Privacy Act of 1974, any statement or information provided by you may be used by the Commission to determine if further enforcement action is required. Any knowingly or willfully false statement, or concealment of any material fact, made in reply to this Citation is punishable by fine or imprisonment. Please also note that Section 1.17 of the Rules requires that you provide truthful and accurate statements to the Commission. V. CONTACT INFORMATION 11. The closest FCC Office is the Detroit Office in Farmington Hills, Michigan. You may contact James Bridgewater by telephone, (248) 471-5661, to schedule a personal interview, which must take place within thirty (30) days after the release date of this Citation. You
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2011/DA-11-704A1.html
  • with the Commission. 9. Under the Privacy Act of 1974, any statement or information provided by you may be used by the Commission to determine if further enforcement action is required. Any knowingly or willfully false statement, or concealment of any material fact, made in reply to this Citation is punishable by fine or imprisonment. Please also note that section 1.17 of the Rules requires that you provide truthful and accurate statements to the Commission. V. CONTACT INFORMATION 10. The closest FCC Office is the Philadelphia Office in Langhorne, Pennsylvania. You may contact Gene Stanbro by telephone, (215) 741-3016, to schedule a personal interview, which must take place within thirty (30) days after the release date of this Citation. You should
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2011/DA-11-812A1.html
  • with the Commission. 12. Under the Privacy Act of 1974, any statement or information provided by you may be used by the Commission to determine if further enforcement action is required. Any knowingly or willfully false statement, or concealment of any material fact, made in reply to this Citation is punishable by fine or imprisonment. Please also note that section 1.17 of the Rules requires that you provide truthful and accurate statements to the Commission. V. CONTACT INFORMATION 13. The closest FCC office is the New York District Office in New York, NY. You may contact Karen Mercer by telephone, (202) 418-1160, to schedule a personal interview, which must take place within thirty (30) calendar days after the release date of
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2011/DA-11-924A1.html
  • with the Commission. 12. Under the Privacy Act of 1974, any statement or information provided by you may be used by the Commission to determine if further enforcement action is required. Any knowingly or willfully false statement, or concealment of any material fact, made in reply to this Citation is punishable by fine or imprisonment. Please also note that section 1.17 of the Rules requires that you provide truthful and accurate statements to the Commission. VI. CONTACT INFORMATION 13. The closest FCC Office is the Atlanta District Office in Atlanta, Georgia. Pyong Kon Eun may contact Salomon Satche by telephone, 301-725-1996, to schedule a personal interview, which must take place within Thirty (30) calendar days after the release date of this
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2011/DA-11-984A1.html
  • with the Commission. 11. Under the Privacy Act of 1974, any statement or information provided by you may be used by the Commission to determine if further enforcement action is required. Any knowingly or willfully false statement, or concealment of any material fact, made in reply to this Citation is punishable by fine or imprisonment. Please also note that section 1.17 of the Rules requires that you provide truthful and accurate statements to the Commission. V. CONTACT INFORMATION 12. The closest FCC office is the Chicago District Office in Park Ridge, Illinois. You may contact James M. Roop by telephone, 847-813-4660, to schedule a personal interview, which must take place within thirty (30) days after the release date of this Citation.
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2011/DA-11-98A1.html
  • with the Commission. 11. Under the Privacy Act of 1974, any statement or information provided by you may be used by the Commission to determine if further enforcement action is required. Any knowingly or willfully false statement, or concealment of any material fact, made in reply to this Citation is punishable by fine or imprisonment. Please also note that Section 1.17 of the Rules requires that you provide truthful and accurate statements to the Commission. IV. CONTACT INFORMATION 12. The closest FCC Office is the Seattle Field Office in Kirkland, Washington. You may contact Salomon Satche by telephone, (301) 725-1996, to schedule a personal interview, which must take place within thirty (30) days after the release date of this Citation. You
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2011/DOC-313017A1.html
  • III(B) - page 10) TIME OF DAY VIOLATION (See Attachment A, section IV - page 11) CALLER IDENTIFICATION VIOLATION (See Attachment A, section V - page 12) If, after receipt of this citation, you or your company again violates section 227 of the Act or sections 64.1200, 64.1601(e), or 68.318 of the Commission's rules in any manner or violates section 1.17 of our rules (discussed below) when responding to this citation, the Commission may impose monetary forfeitures not to exceed $16,000 for each such violation or each day of a continuing violation. RESPONDING TO THE CITATION You may respond to this citation within 30 days from the date of this letter either through (1) a written statement, (2) a teleconference interview
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2011/DOC-313019A1.html
  • III(B) - page 10) TIME OF DAY VIOLATION (See Attachment A, section IV - page 11) CALLER IDENTIFICATION VIOLATION (See Attachment A, section V - page 12) If, after receipt of this citation, you or your company again violates section 227 of the Act or sections 64.1200, 64.1601(e), or 68.318 of the Commission's rules in any manner or violates section 1.17 of our rules (discussed below) when responding to this citation, the Commission may impose monetary forfeitures not to exceed $16,000 for each such violation or each day of a continuing violation. RESPONDING TO THE CITATION You may respond to this citation within 30 days from the date of this letter either through (1) a written statement, (2) a teleconference interview
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2011/DOC-313020A1.html
  • III(B) - page 10) TIME OF DAY VIOLATION (See Attachment A, section IV - page 11) CALLER IDENTIFICATION VIOLATION (See Attachment A, section V - page 12) If, after receipt of this citation, you or your company again violates section 227 of the Act or sections 64.1200, 64.1601(e), or 68.318 of the Commission's rules in any manner or violates section 1.17 of our rules (discussed below) when responding to this citation, the Commission may impose monetary forfeitures not to exceed $16,000 for each such violation or each day of a continuing violation. RESPONDING TO THE CITATION You may respond to this citation within 30 days from the date of this letter either through (1) a written statement, (2) a teleconference interview
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2011/DOC-313021A1.html
  • III(B) - page 10) TIME OF DAY VIOLATION (See Attachment A, section IV - page 11) CALLER IDENTIFICATION VIOLATION (See Attachment A, section V - page 12) If, after receipt of this citation, you or your company again violates section 227 of the Act or sections 64.1200, 64.1601(e), or 68.318 of the Commission's rules in any manner or violates section 1.17 of our rules (discussed below) when responding to this citation, the Commission may impose monetary forfeitures not to exceed $16,000 for each such violation or each day of a continuing violation. RESPONDING TO THE CITATION You may respond to this citation within 30 days from the date of this letter either through (1) a written statement, (2) a teleconference interview
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2011/DOC-313022A1.html
  • III(B) - page 10) TIME OF DAY VIOLATION (See Attachment A, section IV - page 11) CALLER IDENTIFICATION VIOLATION (See Attachment A, section V - page 12) If, after receipt of this citation, you or your company again violates section 227 of the Act or sections 64.1200, 64.1601(e), or 68.318 of the Commission's rules in any manner or violates section 1.17 of our rules (discussed below) when responding to this citation, the Commission may impose monetary forfeitures not to exceed $16,000 for each such violation or each day of a continuing violation. RESPONDING TO THE CITATION You may respond to this citation within 30 days from the date of this letter either through (1) a written statement, (2) a teleconference interview
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2011/DOC-313023A1.html
  • III(B) - page 10) TIME OF DAY VIOLATION (See Attachment A, section IV - page 11) CALLER IDENTIFICATION VIOLATION (See Attachment A, section V - page 12) If, after receipt of this citation, you or your company again violates section 227 of the Act or sections 64.1200, 64.1601(e), or 68.318 of the Commission's rules in any manner or violates section 1.17 of our rules (discussed below) when responding to this citation, the Commission may impose monetary forfeitures not to exceed $16,000 for each such violation or each day of a continuing violation. RESPONDING TO THE CITATION You may respond to this citation within 30 days from the date of this letter either through (1) a written statement, (2) a teleconference interview
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2011/DOC-313024A1.html
  • III(B) - page 10) TIME OF DAY VIOLATION (See Attachment A, section IV - page 11) CALLER IDENTIFICATION VIOLATION (See Attachment A, section V - page 12) If, after receipt of this citation, you or your company again violates section 227 of the Act or sections 64.1200, 64.1601(e), or 68.318 of the Commission's rules in any manner or violates section 1.17 of our rules (discussed below) when responding to this citation, the Commission may impose monetary forfeitures not to exceed $16,000 for each such violation or each day of a continuing violation. RESPONDING TO THE CITATION You may respond to this citation within 30 days from the date of this letter either through (1) a written statement, (2) a teleconference interview
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2011/DOC-313025A1.html
  • III(B) - page 10) TIME OF DAY VIOLATION (See Attachment A, section IV - page 11) CALLER IDENTIFICATION VIOLATION (See Attachment A, section V - page 12) If, after receipt of this citation, you or your company again violates section 227 of the Act or sections 64.1200, 64.1601(e), or 68.318 of the Commission's rules in any manner or violates section 1.17 of our rules (discussed below) when responding to this citation, the Commission may impose monetary forfeitures not to exceed $16,000 for each such violation or each day of a continuing violation. RESPONDING TO THE CITATION You may respond to this citation within 30 days from the date of this letter either through (1) a written statement, (2) a teleconference interview
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2011/DOC-313028A1.html
  • III(B) - page 10) TIME OF DAY VIOLATION (See Attachment A, section IV - page 11) CALLER IDENTIFICATION VIOLATION (See Attachment A, section V - page 12) If, after receipt of this citation, you or your company again violates section 227 of the Act or sections 64.1200, 64.1601(e), or 68.318 of the Commission's rules in any manner or violates section 1.17 of our rules (discussed below) when responding to this citation, the Commission may impose monetary forfeitures not to exceed $16,000 for each such violation or each day of a continuing violation. RESPONDING TO THE CITATION You may respond to this citation within 30 days from the date of this letter either through (1) a written statement, (2) a teleconference interview
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2012/DA-12-64A1.html
  • Media Designer, Clear Channel Los Angeles. See LOI Response at Exhibit K and Further LOI Response at Exhibit 2. See LOI Response at 4 and Application of WorldCom, Inc. and MCI Communications Corporation for Transfer of Control of MCI Communications Corporation to Worldcom, Inc., Memorandum Opinion and Order, 13 FCC Rcd 18025, 18134 P: 193 (1998) (citing 47 C.F.R. S: 1.17 for proposition that, in light of their duty to be truthful and accurate in their representations to the Commission, statements provided by Commission licensees in response to investigatory or adjudicatory matters within the Commission's jurisdiction are awarded substantial weight in the absence of persuasive evidence to the contrary). See The Commission's Forfeiture Policy Statement and Amendment of Section 1.80 of
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2012/DA-12-679A1.html
  • with the Commission. 9. Under the Privacy Act of 1974, any statement or information provided by you may be used by the Commission to determine if further enforcement action is required. Any knowingly or willfully false statement, or concealment of any material fact, made in reply to this Citation is punishable by fine or imprisonment. Please also note that Section 1.17 of the Rules requires that you provide truthful and accurate statements to the Commission. V. CONTACT INFORMATION 10. The closest FCC Office is the Atlanta Office in Atlanta, Georgia. North Chapel may contact Douglas Miller by telephone, (770) 935-3370, to schedule a personal interview, which must take place within thirty (30) calendar days after the release date of this Citation.
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2012/DA-12-931A1.html
  • 14, 2012 By the Resident Agent, Houston Office, South Central Region, Enforcement Bureau: I. INTRODUCTION 1. In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (NAL), we find Vision Latina Broadcasting, Inc. (Vision Latina Broadcasting), licensee of Station KBPO, Port Neches, Texas, apparently liable for a forfeiture in the amount of twenty five thousand dollars ($25,000) for willful violation of Section 1.17(a)(2) of the Commission's rules (Rules). The noted violation involves Vision Latina Broadcasting's provision of incorrect factual information of a material nature to the Commission regarding Station KBPO's public inspection file without a reasonable basis for believing that the information was correct and accurate. II. BACKGROUND 2. On December 9, 2010, during regular business hours, an agent from the Enforcement Bureau's
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2012/DOC-313029A1.html
  • III(B) - page 10) TIME OF DAY VIOLATION (See Attachment A, section IV - page 11) CALLER IDENTIFICATION VIOLATION (See Attachment A, section V - page 12) If, after receipt of this citation, you or your company again violates section 227 of the Act or sections 64.1200, 64.1601(e), or 68.318 of the Commission's rules in any manner or violates section 1.17 of our rules (discussed below) when responding to this citation, the Commission may impose monetary forfeitures not to exceed $16,000 for each such violation or each day of a continuing violation. RESPONDING TO THE CITATION You may respond to this citation within 30 days from the date of this letter either through (1) a written statement, (2) a teleconference interview
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2012/DOC-313030A1.html
  • III(B) - page 10) TIME OF DAY VIOLATION (See Attachment A, section IV - page 11) CALLER IDENTIFICATION VIOLATION (See Attachment A, section V - page 12) If, after receipt of this citation, you or your company again violates section 227 of the Act or sections 64.1200, 64.1601(e), or 68.318 of the Commission's rules in any manner or violates section 1.17 of our rules (discussed below) when responding to this citation, the Commission may impose monetary forfeitures not to exceed $16,000 for each such violation or each day of a continuing violation. RESPONDING TO THE CITATION You may respond to this citation within 30 days from the date of this letter either through (1) a written statement, (2) a teleconference interview
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Public_Notices/DA-10-91A1.html
  • include number of complaints, broken down by category or complaint, e.g., instances of improper access by employees, instances of improper disclosure to individuals not authorized to receive the information, or instances of improper access to online information by individuals not authorized to view the information.] The company represents and warrants that the above certification is consistent with 47. C.F.R. S: 1.17 which requires truthful and accurate statements to the Commission. The company also acknowledges that false statements and misrepresentations to the Commission are punishable under Title 18 of the U.S. Code and may subject it to enforcement action. Signed _____________________________ [Signature of an officer, as agent of the carrier] Attachments: Accompanying Statement explaining CPNI procedures Explanation of actions taken against data
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Public_Notices/DA-11-159A1.html
  • the number of complaints, broken down by category or complaint, e.g., instances of improper access by employees, instances of improper disclosure to individuals not authorized to receive the information, or instances of improper access to online information by individuals not authorized to view the information.] The company represents and warrants that the above certification is consistent with 47. C.F.R. S: 1.17 which requires truthful and accurate statements to the Commission. The company also acknowledges that false statements and misrepresentations to the Commission are punishable under Title 18 of the U.S. Code and may subject it to enforcement action. Signed _____________________________ [Signature of an officer, as agent of the carrier] Attachments: Accompanying Statement explaining CPNI procedures Explanation of actions taken against data
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Public_Notices/DA-11-500A1.html
  • Ownership in the Broadcasting Services, Report and Order and Third Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, 23 FCC Rcd 5922, 5940 P: 40 (2008). See id. at 5941 P: 49. See id. See FCC Form 303-S (eff. March 2011) (a copy of which is available from the FCC's website), available at http://www.fcc.gov/Forms/Form303-S/303s.pdf. See 47 U.S.C. S: 309(k). See 47 C.F.R. S: 1.17. See 47 C.F.R. S: 1.65 (applicants have a continuing obligation to advise the FCC, through amendments, of any substantial and material changes in the information furnished in this application). Page 2 of 2 PUBLIC NOTICE Page 1of 2 PUBLIC NOTICE FCC ENFORCEMENT ADVISORY Federal Communications Commission 445 12th St., S.W. Washington, D.C. 20554 News Media Information 202 / 418-0500 Internet:
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Public_Notices/DA-12-170A1.html
  • the number of complaints, broken down by category or complaint, e.g., instances of improper access by employees, instances of improper disclosure to individuals not authorized to receive the information, or instances of improper access to online information by individuals not authorized to view the information.] The company represents and warrants that the above certification is consistent with 47. C.F.R. S: 1.17 which requires truthful and accurate statements to the Commission. The company also acknowledges that false statements and misrepresentations to the Commission are punishable under Title 18 of the U.S. Code and may subject it to enforcement action. Signed _____________________________ [Signature of an officer, as agent of the carrier] Attachments: Accompanying Statement explaining CPNI procedures Explanation of actions taken against data
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-06-1427A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-06-1427A1.pdf
  • with the Commission. However, because of the untruthfulness of ICS's certification in the WVXG(FM) assignment application that it had no other broadcast interests at a time when Litton, its sole principal, was still an officer of another Commission broadcast permittee, and subsequently certified an FCC filing on behalf of that permittee, confirming his continued position in it, ICS violated Section 1.17 of the Commission's rules. We will admonish ICS for that violation, and we caution it to be more attentive to its applicant certifications in the future. A false statement, even absent an intent to deceive, constitutes an actionable violation of Section 1.17 of the Commission's rules. Conclusion/Order. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, that the Petition to Deny filed on September 1,
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-06-1505A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-06-1505A1.pdf
  • in its renewal application, amendments, and in responses to Commission inquiries, which provided less than complete, factually sound information. The Commission relies on licensees to provide truthful and accurate information in order to carry out its mission. When issuing a license, we must be assured of the accuracy of the licensee's representations. Recently, the Commission expanded the scope of Section 1.17, with respect to investigations and adjudications, to prohibit ``written and oral statements of fact that are intentionally incorrect or misleading and written statements that are made without a reasonable basis for believing the statement is correct and not misleading.'' Misrepresentation involves false statements made with an intent to deceive. Lack of candor involves concealment, evasion, or other failure to be
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-06-2344A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-06-2344A1.pdf
  • application that it had placed all required documentation in the station's public file at the appropriate times was untrue. The Commission relies on licensees to provide truthful and accurate information in order to carry out its mission. When issuing a license, we must be assured of the accuracy of the licensee's representations. Recently, the Commission expanded the scope of Section 1.17 of the Rules, with respect to investigations and adjudications, to prohibit ``written and oral statements of fact that are intentionally incorrect or misleading and written statements that are made without a reasonable basis for believing the statement is correct and not misleading.'' Misrepresentation involves false statements made with an intent to deceive. Lack of candor involves concealment, evasion, or other
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-3419A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-3419A1.pdf
  • Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully and repeatedly violated Section 1.17 of the Rules by falsely certifying in the captioned license renewal applications that the Stations' public inspection files were complete throughout the license term and by providing in a written statement material factual information that was incorrect without a reasonable basis for believing that such information was correct and not misleading. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-3515A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-3515A1.pdf
  • documentation in the WBFH(FM) public inspection file. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary forfeiture in the amount of seventeen thousand dollars ($17,000); we grant in part and deny in part RB's and Superior's pleadings; we admonish the Licensee for its apparent violation of Section 1.17 of the Rules; and we grant the Renewal Application. II. BACKGROUND Section 73.3539(a) of the Rules requires that applications for renewal of license for broadcast stations must be filed ``not later than the first day of the fourth full calendar month prior to the expiration date of the license sought to be renewed.'' An application for renewal of the Station's
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-3615A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-3615A1.pdf
  • Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL''), issued pursuant to Sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by the Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau by authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated Section 1.17 of the Rules by falsely certifying in the WWRL(AM) license renewal application that the Station's public inspection file was complete throughout the license term. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary forfeiture in the amount of ten thousand dollars ($10,000), and we grant the captioned
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-4136A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-4136A1.pdf
  • after the assignment was completed. See Petition at 23-25, n.8 (citing FCC v. WOKO, Inc., 329 U.S. 223, 227 (1946); Fox Television Stations, Inc., Memorandum Opinion and Order, 10 FCC Rcd 8452, 8478 (1995); Pinelands, Inc., Memorandum Opinion and Order, 7 FCC Rcd 6058, 6065; Fox River Broadcasting, Inc., Order, 93 FCC 2d 127, 129 (1983)). See 47 C.F.R. § 1.17. See Contemporary Media, Inc., Decision, 13 FCC Rcd 14437, 14458-59 (1998), aff'd, Contemporary Media, Inc. v. FCC, 214 F.3d 187 (D.C. Cir. 2000). Intention can be inferred from motive. See, e.g., RKO General, Inc., Decision, 4 FCC Rcd 4679, 4684 (Rev. Bd. 1989). Opposition at 7. See Declaration of Richard Jackson, Executive Director, Research Foundation at 2 (May 15, 2007)
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-4517A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-4517A1.pdf
  • quarterly issues and programs lists. Based on our review of the facts and circumstances, we conclude that AMFM Broadcasting apparently has willfully and repeatedly violated Section 73.3526 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules'') at KNEW(AM). As such, we propose a forfeiture against AMFM Broadcasting in the total amount of $10,000. We also conclude that Citicasters apparently has willfully violated Section 1.17(a) of the Rules for falsely responding ``Yes'' to Section II, Item 4, of KSJO(FM)'s renewal application, and propose a forfeiture against Citicasters in the total amount of $10,000. As discussed below, we will grant the YMC Petitions to the extent indicated, otherwise deny the petitions to deny and informal objections, and grant the Renewal Applications. II. THE RENEWAL APPLICATIONS In
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-08-1372A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-08-1372A1.pdf
  • 1.1204(a)(8). File No. BNPH-20070423AAS. Coosa Valley News, Inc. and Mr. Howard C. Toole, Letter, 22 FCC Rcd 18600 (MB 2007), petition for recon. pending (``Toole Decision''). Objection at 2. Id. Id. Opposition at 3-4. Memorandum Opinion and Order, 11 FCC Rcd 15464 (1996) (``Greater Muskegon Broadcasters''). Id. at 15472 (emphasis added). See, e.g., 47 U.S.C. § 309(d); 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.17, 1.41 - 1.77, 73.3584, 73.3587, 73.5006, 73.7004. See, e.g., 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.52, 73.3584(b). Coleman Objection, first unnumbered page. Id., second unnumbered page. Id., second-third unnumbered pages. See 47 U.S.C. § 310(d); Dorothy J. Owens, Debtor-in-Possession, Memorandum Opinion and Order, 5 FCC Rcd 6615 (1990). Cf. Policy Regarding Character Qualifications in Broadcast Licensing, Report, Order and Policy Statement, 102 FCC
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-08-1536A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-08-1536A1.pdf
  • required that any lease be subject to an "unacceptable" six-month cancellation provision. Finally, Logos argues that its ability to receive an extension grant was not dependent on site availability since Logos had already substantially constructed the Station when the extension application was filed. As such, it asserts that it had no motive to deceive the Commission regarding site availability. Section 1.17(a) of the Rules provides that no person, in any written or oral statement of fact, may provide material factual information that is incorrect or misleading. It also provides that no person may provide in any written statement of fact, ``material factual information that is incorrect or omit material information that is necessary to prevent any material factual statement that is
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-08-1576A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-08-1576A1.pdf
  • alleging that Riverside made a false certification in an earlier application to modify the WZNP(FM) facilities. For the reasons stated below, we treat the Petition as an Informal Objection and deny it, and we grant the Assignment Application. However, the Bureau finds that Riverside did, in fact, demonstrate a lack of candor on the Modification Application in violation of Section 1.17(a)(1) of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''). In this Memorandum Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL''), issued pursuant to 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 1.80 of the Rules, by the Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau, by the authority delegated under Section 0.283 of the Rules, we find that
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-09-660A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-09-660A1.pdf
  • June 29, 2008, regarding the effects of the proposals on the quality of the human environment. For the reasons set forth below, we: (1) find that no further environmental processing is warranted; (2) grant the KBEN/KWHO Objection and KROW Objection to the extent indicated herein, and otherwise deny them; (3) admonish White Park for its apparent willful violation of Section 1.17 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), and (4) grant the Applications. II. BACKGROUND White Park was the successful bidder in FM Auction No. 37 for an FM frequency in Lovell, Wyoming, and it was the successful bidder in FM Auction No. 62 for several FM frequencies, including Basin and Cody, Wyoming. White Park's subsequent ``long-form'' applications for those frequencies were
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-10-1921A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-10-1921A1.pdf
  • failure to be fully informative, accompanied by intent to deceive.'' Intent to deceive is established if a licensee knowingly makes a false statement and can also be inferred when the surrounding circumstances clearly show the existence of intent to deceive. The Commission may disqualify an applicant who deliberately makes misrepresentations or lacks candor in dealing with the agency. Moreover, Section 1.17(a)(2) of the Rules provides that no person may provide, in any written statement of fact, ``material factual information that is incorrect or omit material information that is necessary to prevent any material factual statement that is made from being incorrect or misleading without a reasonable basis for believing that any such material factual statement is correct and not misleading.'' Thus,
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-10-2064A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-10-2064A1.pdf
  • and have violated Section 73.858 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'') because they are not separately incorporated with a local presence and mission. Lawyers Guild also claims that Applicants have violated the LPFM multiple-ownership Rules because EWTN and Starboard own translators in the area. Next, Lawyers Guild avers that Applicants misrepresented their true identity to the Commission, a violation of Section 1.17 of the Rules. Finally, Lawyers Guild maintains that Applicants' proposed retransmission of EWTN's network programming violates Section 73.879 of the Rules. In response, Applicants claim to be wholly independent of EWTN and state that it played no part in the application process, but that Starboard, a nonprofit corporation dedicated to dissemination of the Roman Catholic Church's teachings, recruited the Applicants
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-10-637A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-10-637A1.pdf
  • may officially notice, the petitioner has presented a ``substantial and material question of fact'' to warrant further inquiry. As an initial matter, we note that KLEI-TV is now licensed on digital channel 25 has terminated analog television service on channel 6, and therefore Cedar Cove's Channel 6 argument is now moot. With respect to Cedar Cove's false certification argument, Section 1.17(a)(2) of the Rules provides that no person may provide, in any written statement of fact, ``material factual information that is incorrect or omit material information that is necessary to prevent any material factual statement that is made from being incorrect or misleading without a reasonable basis for believing that any such material factual statement is correct and not misleading.'' In
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-10-702A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-10-702A1.pdf
  • for the reasons stated below, we: (1) dismiss the License Objection as moot; (2) grant in part and deny in all other respects the Modification and Supplemental Objections; (3) grant the Modification Application; and (4) conclude that Saga is apparently liable for a monetary forfeiture in the amount of ten thousand dollars ($10,000) for false certification in violation of Section 1.17(a)(2) of the Rules. II. BACKGROUND The Station is currently licensed to operate on Channel 238 with two directional Scala HDCA 10-element antennas located at 105 feet and 50 feet height above ground level (``AGL''), directed at six degrees and 295 degrees true, respectively. On July 27, 2007, the staff granted Finger Lakes' proposal to move WFIZ(FM) from Channel 240 at
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-11-1128A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-11-1128A1.pdf
  • the Station. Accordingly, we direct Licensee and CPRN, jointly or separately, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), 308(b) and 403 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), to provide responses to the following inquiries, within thirty (30) calendar days from the date of this letter. The Licensee may supplement its responses with additional relevant information pursuant to Sections 1.17 and 1.88 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''). Background. Under the terms of the PSOA, executed on January 12, 2011, the Licensee agreed to make the Station's facilities available to air programming supplied by CPRN ``for up to 24 hours a day, seven days per week'' for the term of the agreement. Additionally, the PSOA provides that: (1) the Station
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-11-1851A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-11-1851A1.pdf
  • failure to be fully informative, accompanied by intent to deceive.'' Intent to deceive is established if a licensee knowingly makes a false statement and can also be inferred when the surrounding circumstances clearly show the existence of intent to deceive. The Commission may disqualify an applicant who deliberately makes misrepresentations or lacks candor in dealing with the agency. Moreover, Section 1.17(a)(2) of the Rules provides that no person may provide, in any written statement of fact, ``material factual information that is incorrect or omit material information that is necessary to prevent any material factual statement that is made from being incorrect or misleading without a reasonable basis for believing that any such material factual statement is correct and not misleading.'' Thus,
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-11-308A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-11-308A1.pdf
  • this point, we reject without further consideration this unsupported and repetitious argument. 7. Sudbury also argues that the forfeiture amount, for what it refers to as a ``minor mistake'' and ``inadvertent omission,'' is unreasonable and unjust when compared to the decision in Logos Broadcasting Corp., in which the Commission admonished a licensee for making false certifications in violation of Section 1.17 of the Rules. Sudbury, however, neglects to mention the reason for the Commission's seemingly light treatment for what we agree is a serious Rule violation - that issuance of a forfeiture was barred by the statute of limitations. As such, the decision in Logos carries no persuasive weight. 8. Next, Sudbury argues that the forfeiture amount is inconsistent with several
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-11-397A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-11-397A1.pdf
  • request in the Kentucky NAL, it would have dismissed the request as it has dismissed similar requests from other licensees. Therefore, the staff's failure to address the waiver request in the Kentucky NAL is harmless error. Finally, BBN asserts that the disparity between the sanctions issued for the violation at issue here and the sanctions issued for violations of Section 1.17 of the Rules in Logos Broadcasting provide it with grounds for cancellation of the Forfeiture Order. BBN contends that the Commission cannot justify issuing a forfeiture for failure to timely file a license a renewal application when it ``merely admonished a licensee that made false certifications to the Commission.'' However, BBN mischaracterizes the decision. In Logos Broadcasting, the Bureau admonished
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-11-398A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-11-398A1.pdf
  • multiple stations. BBN has failed to justify why departure from this precedent is warranted with respect to its violations. The Act requires that violations be either willful or repeated. Here, we find that BBN's violations were willful and repeated. Finally, BBN asserts that the disparity between the sanctions issued for these violations and the sanctions issued for violations of Section 1.17 of the Rules in another decision provide it with grounds for cancellation of the Forfeiture Order. BBN contends that the Commission cannot justify issuing forfeitures for failure to timely file license renewal applications when it ``merely admonished a licensee that made false certifications to the Commission.'' However BBN mischaracterizes the decision. In Logos Broadcasting, the Bureau admonished a licensee for
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-11-399A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-11-399A1.pdf
  • failure to address BBN's waiver request in the NAL made no difference in the substantive decision reached by the Bureau; therefore, the staff's failure to address the waiver request in the NAL amounts to harmless error. Finally, BBN asserts that the disparity between the sanctions issued for the violation at issue here and the sanctions issued for violations of Section 1.17 of the Rules in Logos Broadcasting provide it with grounds for cancellation of the Forfeiture Order. BBN contends that the Commission cannot justify issuing a forfeiture for failure to timely file a license renewal application when it ``merely admonished a licensee that made false certifications to the Commission.'' However BBN mischaracterizes the decision. In Logos Broadcasting, the Bureau admonished a
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-11-691A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-11-691A1.pdf
  • reject without further consideration this unsupported and repetitious argument. 7. Phoenix also argues that the forfeiture amount, for what it refers to in each case as a ``minor mistake'' and ``inadvertent omission,'' is unreasonable and unjust when compared to the decision in Logos Broadcasting Corp., in which the Commission admonished a licensee for making false certifications in violation of Section 1.17 of the Rules. Phoenix, however, neglects to mention the reason for the Commission's seemingly light treatment for what we agree is a serious Rule violation - that issuance of a forfeiture was barred by the statute of limitations. As such, the decision in Logos carries no persuasive weight. 8. Next, Phoenix again argues that the forfeiture amounts are inconsistent with
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-11-692A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-11-692A1.pdf
  • this point, we reject without further consideration this unsupported and repetitious argument. 8. Saga also argues that the forfeiture amount, for what it refers to as a ``minor mistake'' and ``inadvertent omission,'' is unreasonable and unjust when compared to the decision in Logos Broadcasting Corp., in which the Commission admonished a licensee for making false certifications in violation of Section 1.17 of the Rules. Saga, however, neglects to mention the reason for the Commission's seemingly light treatment for what we agree is a serious Rule violation - that issuance of a forfeiture was barred by the statute of limitations. As such, the decision in Logos carries no persuasive weight. 9. Lastly, Saga reiterates arguments made in its Request that the imposition
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-11-693A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-11-693A1.pdf
  • this point, we reject without further consideration this unsupported and repetitious argument. 8. Saga also argues that the forfeiture amount, for what it refers to as a ``minor mistake'' and ``inadvertent omission,'' is unreasonable and unjust when compared to the decision in Logos Broadcasting Corp., in which the Commission admonished a licensee for making false certifications in violation of Section 1.17 of the Rules. Saga, however, neglects to mention the reason for the Commission's seemingly light treatment for what we agree is a serious Rule violation - that issuance of a forfeiture was barred by the statute of limitations. As such, the decision in Logos carries no persuasive weight. 9. Lastly, Saga reiterates arguments made in its Request that the imposition
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-12-185A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-12-185A1.pdf
  • Wisconsin, by a succession of serial minor change applications. We direct the Licensee, pursuant to Sections 4(i), 4(j), 308(b) and 403 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, to provide responses to the following inquiries, within thirty (30) calendar days from the date of this letter. The Licensee may supplement its responses with additional relevant information pursuant to Sections 1.17 and 1.88 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''). Instructions If the Licensee requests that any information or Documents, as defined herein, responsive to this letter be treated in a confidential manner, the Licensee shall submit, along with all responsive information and Documents, a statement in accordance with Section 0.459 of the Rules. Requests for confidential treatment must comply with the
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-12-725A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-12-725A1.pdf
  • 1 71.75 344.899 Tm 99 Tz (application for consent to the proposed assignment of license for Station KUSF\(FM\), San Francisco, CA) Tj 1 0 0 1 71.75 331.949 Tm 100 Tz (\(the "Station"\) from USF to CPRN. In particular, the Consent Decree resolves the Bureau's investigation) Tj 1 0 0 1 71.75 319.699 Tm (of the applicants' compliance with Sections 1.17 and) Tj 1 0 0 1 307.9 319.25 Tm 97 Tz /OPBaseFont3 11 Tf (73.503\(c\)) Tj 1 0 0 1 353.25 319.25 Tm 100 Tz /OPBaseFont1 11 Tf (of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R.) Tj 1 0 0 1 72.2 307.199 Tm 82 Tz (§ § 1.17,) Tj 1 0 0 1 107.5 307 Tm 97 Tz /OPBaseFont3 11 Tf
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/FCC-10-147A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/FCC-10-147A1.pdf
  • show the existence of intent to deceive, even if there is no direct evidence of a motive. Floyd's apparent repeated failure to disclose his felony conviction in three filings with the Commission raises very serious questions whether he misrepresented material facts to, and/or was lacking in candor in his dealings with, the Commission, in willful and/or repeated violation of Section 1.17 of the Commission's Rules. The mere existence of an inaccuracy in any application, without any indication that there was intentional deception, is insufficient to justify consideration of a misrepresentation or lack of candor issue in an evidentiary hearing. In this case, however, as set forth above, Floyd failed to disclose his felony conviction in response to a direct question in
• http://www.fcc.gov/ftp/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Databases/documents_collection/98-57.doc http://www.fcc.gov/ftp/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Databases/documents_collection/98-57.pdf
  • select among mutually exclusive noncommercial station applicants. See Reexamination of the Comparative Standards for New Noncommercial Educational Applicants, Notice of Proposed Rule Making, 10 FCC Rcd 2877 (1995). Such applicants are now subject to a processing freeze. Id. Pub. L. No. 105-33, 111 Stat. 251 (1997). See Gonzales Broadcasting, Inc., 12 FCC Rcd 1253, 1255-56 (1997). See 47 C.F.R. ( 1.17 ("The Commission or its representatives may, in writing, require from any applicant, permittee or licensee written statements of fact relevant to a determination whether an application should be granted or denied, or to a determination of whether a license should be revoked, or to some other matter within the jurisdiction of the Commission."). 47 C.F.R. ( 73.3613(b). We note that
• http://www.fcc.gov/ib/pd/pf/214guide.html
  • guidelines that applicants may follow. Insufficiency of an application may result in denial or removal from streamlining procedures. Applicants are also under an obligation to maintain the continuing accuracy and completeness of information furnished in a pending application pursuant to Section 1.65 of the Commissions rules, 47 C.F.R. 1.65. The Commission may request further information as necessary pursuant to Section 1.17 of the Commissions rules, 47 C.F.R. 1.17, and Sections 4(i) and 403 of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. 154(i), 403. The information required to be included in initial Section 214 applications also is required to be included in applications to assign or transfer control of international Section 214 authorizations. See Part III.B.3 below. In most cases, information is required of
• http://www.fcc.gov/ib/sand/mniab/traffic/files/ITRND01.pdf
  • 1.60 1.61 1966 32.3 100.1 47.6 52.5 18.9 30.1 3.10 1.47 1.63 1.59 1.61 1967 39.7 114.2 54.6 59.6 23.4 31.8 2.88 1.38 1.50 1.36 1.45 1968 46.4 126.9 61.5 65.4 28.2 40.0 2.73 1.33 1.41 1.42 1.41 1969 64.6 172.0 82.7 89.4 38.3 51.6 2.66 1.28 1.38 1.35 1.37 1970 81.1 196.6 98.9 97.7 51.0 59.8 2.43 1.22 1.21 1.17 1.19 1971 100.9 237.4 120.7 116.6 68.4 75.1 2.35 1.20 1.16 1.10 1.13 1972 126.5 291.8 148.2 143.6 91.7 98.6 2.31 1.17 1.14 1.08 1.11 1973 159.3 364.9 184.4 180.5 111.5 120.2 2.29 1.16 1.13 1.08 1.11 1974 190.7 428.7 216.6 212.1 142.0 152.2 2.25 1.14 1.11 1.07 1.09 1975 219.4 490.2 247.4 242.9 167.0 176.9 2.23 1.13 1.11 1.06
• http://www.fcc.gov/ib/wrc-03/files/docs/meeting/iwg/iwg_5/minutes01.pdf
  • or not Agenda item 1.8 belonged in IWG 5 or IWG 3. The meeting decided to treat the item, assigning drafting of the preliminary view to Boeing or Teledesic. Neither company was present. Agenda items 1.9, 1.10, and 1.14 were discussed and it was decided that the Coast Guard had the most interest in them. Since these items and item 1.17 address bands that are only occupied by the government, the meeting decided to wait for a view from RCS. PanAmSat was assigned the drafting of Agenda item 1.24 dealing with 13.75 ­ 14.0 GHz and Resolution 733. It was noted that the U.S. government agencies in the RCS are dealing with the items in parallel. It was noted that the
• http://www.fcc.gov/ib/wrc-03/files/docs/meeting/iwg/iwg_5/minutes02.pdf
  • FCC adopted, as there was apparently little private sector interest in these two agenda items. Richard Swanson discussed Agenda Item 1.14, dealing with Resolution 207 and 347 (WRC-97). There was no private sector interest indicated on Resolution 207 and it was noted that there were no aviation interests in attendance to address AMS(R)S issues. The Chair next introduced Agenda Item 1.17 and Darlene Drazenovich indicated that the RCS preliminary view was to upgrade the allocation status of radiolocation radars in the 2900-3100 MHz band. There was no objection raised by IWG-5 members, who endorsed the RCS PV on this issue. Discussion then turned to WRC-03 Agenda Item 1.24. A draft Preliminary View of IWG-5 on this issue, which had been distributed
• http://www.fcc.gov/ib/wrc-03/files/docs/meeting/iwg/iwg_5/minutes03.pdf
  • work of WP8B and JTG 4-7-8-9. The JTG has received inputs regarding the FS detecting interference from radars. Currently there are a lot of square brackets in the draft CPM text and they are trying to define Hyperlan 2 or UAII devices. Richard Swanson mentioned that the work of WP8B is consistent with the US Preliminary View regarding Agenda Item 1.17. The Chair then posed the question of where do we go from here regarding Agenda Item 1.24? He proposed coordinated meetings of IWG-5 and USJTG 4-7-8 as a constructive vehicle to bring the two U.S. parties together. The group agreed to this and he said he would bring it up to the Chair/Vice-Chair afternoon meeting. The Chair noted that in
• http://www.fcc.gov/ib/wrc-03/files/docs/meeting/iwg/iwg_5/minutes06.pdf
  • 5th meeting of IWG-5 (Doc. IWG-5/011 and 014) Minutes of both meetings were approved. 4. Reportsa. TG 4-7-8 ­ C. Glass reported that this group is currently considering 5 contributions, deadline for comments is Friday Dec. 21. Final approval by this group before sending to national committee is Jan. 4. b. WP 8B ­ D. Drazenovich reported: i. Agenda Item 1.17 ­ CPM text is 90% complete, two approaches considered 1) Primary allocation or 2) Primary allocation plus a footnote to protect aeronautical navigation ii. Agenda Item 1.28 ­ Still under consideration on the most appropriate approach for resolution via CPM text. Further work is required between ICAO and Administrations to reach agreement on how to best satisfy the agenda item.
• http://www.fcc.gov/ib/wrc-03/files/docs/meeting/iwg/iwg_5/minutes07.pdf
  • noted that it supported the Draft PV that was approved by the WAC and suggested that maybe the IWG should move forward to develop a draft position based on the PV. d.The Group decided to provide language for a draft US proposal on agenda item 1.5 based on the WAC approved IWG-5 PV. e. D. Drazenovich reported: i. Agenda Item 1.17 ­ The RCS (not IRAC) has approved a Draft proposal ( see IWG5/16) which would upgrade to Primary the allocation for the radiolocation service plus a footnote to protect aeronautical navigation ii. Agenda Item 1.28 ­The RCS (not IRAC) approved a Draft proposal ( see IWG 5/17) that adds a footnote to the Aeronautical Radionavigation allocation (108 ­ 117.975 MHz)
• http://www.fcc.gov/ib/wrc-03/files/docs/meeting/iwg/iwg_5/minutes08.pdf
  • will address agenda item 1.24. Those participating in the first part introduced themselves. Approval of Agenda: The same agenda from the previous meeting was approved. Minutes: The minutes of the seventh meeting were agreed (Doc. IWG-5/23). Administrative matters: The Chair went through the IWG-5 document numbers for recent papers. Document 19 is the RCS draft US proposals on agenda items 1.17 and 1.28. He reported that IWG-5 had previously concurred with the agenda item 1.17 proposal, and through correspondence, new language for a footnote in the agenda item 1.28 proposal had been agreed (the agreed text is contained in Document 20). Document 21 is the RCS draft US proposal on agenda item 1.5. Document 22, provided by Alex Roytblat, gives the
• http://www.fcc.gov/ib/wrc-03/files/docs/meeting/iwg/iwg_5/wrc03_iwg_5_tor.pdf
  • (Resolution 348 (WRC-97)); 1.14 to consider measures to address harmful interference in the bands allocated ot the maritime mobile and aeronautical mobile (R) services, taking into account Resolutions 207 (Rev. WRC-2000) and to review the frequency and channel arrangements in the maritime MF and HF bands concerning the use of new digital technology, also taking into account Resolution 347 (WRC-97); 1.17 to consider upgrading the allocation to the radiolocation service in the frequency range 2900 ­ 3100 MLHz to primary; 1.24 to review the usage of the 13.75-14 GHz, in accordance with Resolution 733 (WRC- 2000), with a view to addressing sharing conditions; 1.28 to permit the use of the band 108-117.875 MHz for the transmission of radionavigation satellite differential correction
• http://www.fcc.gov/mb/Octoberauditletter.pdf
  • of the owner of the unit. Send the response to EEO Staff, Policy Division, Media Bureau, Federal Communications Commission, 445 12th Street, S.W., Washington, DC 20554. To knowingly and willfully make any false statement or conceal any material fact in response to this audit is punishable by fine or imprisonment (see 18 U.S.C. § 1001; see also 47 C.F.R. § 1.17), and/or forfeiture (47 U.S.C. § 503). Failure to respond to this audit letter by the deadline noted above is also punishable by sanctions in accordance with 47 C.F.R. § 76.77(f). A failure to respond may also result in a certification that the unit is not in compliance with the Commission's EEO rules for 2008. 5. In accordance with 47 C.F.R.
• http://www.fcc.gov/mb/engineering/part76.pdf
  • and responses to requests of franchising authority. top Cable operators shall comply with franchising authorities' and the Commission's requests for information, orders, and decisions. Any information submitted to a franchising authority or the Commission in making a rate determination pursuant to an FCC Form 393 (and/or FCC Forms 1200/1205) filing or a cost-of-service showing is subject to the provisions of §1.17 of this chapter. [68 FR 15098, Mar. 28, 2003] § 76.940 Prospective rate reduction. top A franchising authority may order a cable operator to implement a reduction in basic service tier or associated equipment rates where necessary to bring rates into compliance with the standards set forth in §§76.922 and 76.923 § 76.941 Rate prescription. top A franchising authority may
• http://www.fcc.gov/mb/peer_review/prrespstudy4a.pdf
  • Sun-Times); and, d) markets with Joint Operating Agreements (JOA) (e.g. the Detroit News and Free Press entered a 100 year JOA in 1987).16 The market structure indicators show that 7.1% of the newspapers belong to a JOA, 50.8% are in a competitive market, 8% are part of two-edition monopoly markets, and the remaining 34.1% are monopolist newspapers as shows Figure IV.1.17 Table IV.2 presents descriptive statistics for the variables to be used. The size of the page is in terms of column inches in order to match it with the available advertisement data (e.g. a page size of an average broad sheet is 127.4, which is calculated by multiplying the number of columns by the height of the columns, in this
• http://www.fcc.gov/mb/policy/eeo/auditFeb2007.doc
  • or other principal of the licensee. Send the response to EEO Staff, Policy Division, Media Bureau, Federal Communications Commission, 445 12th Street, S.W., Washington, DC 20554. To knowingly and willfully make any false statement or conceal any material fact in response to this audit is punishable by fine or imprisonment (see 18 U.S.C. § 1001; see also 47 C.F.R. § 1.17), and/or revocation of any station license or construction permit [47 U.S. Code § 312(a)(1)], and/or forfeiture (47 U.S.C. § 503). Failure to respond to this audit letter by the deadline is also punishable by sanctions against the licensee, in accordance with 47 C.F.R. § 73.2080(g). Should you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact the EEO Staff at (202)
• http://www.fcc.gov/mb/policy/eeo/auditJune72006.doc
  • or an officer of the station. Send the response to EEO Staff, Policy Division, Media Bureau, Federal Communications Commission, 445 12th Street, S.W., Washington, DC 20554. To knowingly and willfully make any false statement or conceal any material fact in response to this audit is punishable by fine or imprisonment (see 18 U.S.C. § 1001; see also 47 C.F.R. § 1.17), and/or revocation of any station license or construction permit [47 U.S. Code § 312(a)(1)], and/or forfeiture (47 U.S.C. § 503). Failure to respond to this audit letter by the deadline is also punishable by sanctions against the licensee, in accordance with 47 C.F.R. § 73.2080(g). Should you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact the EEO Staff at (202)
• http://www.fcc.gov/mb/policy/eeo/auditOct2006.doc
  • of the owner of the unit. Send the response to EEO Staff, Policy Division, Media Bureau, Federal Communications Commission, 445 12th Street, S.W., Washington, DC 20554. To knowingly and willfully make any false statement or conceal any material fact in response to this audit is punishable by fine or imprisonment (see 18 U.S.C. § 1001; see also 47 C.F.R. § 1.17), and/or forfeiture (47 U.S.C. § 503). Failure to respond to this audit letter by the deadline noted above is punishable by sanctions against the unit, in accordance with 47 C.F.R. § 76.77(f). A failure to respond may also result in a certification that the unit is not in compliance with the Commission's EEO rules for 2006. Should you have any
• http://www.fcc.gov/mb/policy/eeo/auditcableletterjune10.doc
  • of the owner of the unit. Send the response to EEO Staff, Policy Division, Media Bureau, Federal Communications Commission, 445 12th Street, S.W., Washington, DC 20554. To knowingly and willfully make any false statement or conceal any material fact in response to this audit is punishable by fine or imprisonment (see 18 U.S.C. § 1001; see also 47 C.F.R. § 1.17), and/or forfeiture (47 U.S.C. § 503). Failure to respond to this audit letter by the deadline is punishable by sanctions against the unit, in accordance with 47 C.F.R. § 76.77(f). Should you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact the EEO Staff at (202) 418-1450. 6. In accordance with 47 C.F.R. § 76.79 of the Commission's rules, a copy
• http://www.fcc.gov/mb/policy/eeo/auditletterjan30.doc
  • or an officer of the station. Send the response to EEO Staff, Policy Division, Media Bureau, Federal Communications Commission, 445 12th Street, S.W., Washington, DC 20554. To knowingly and willfully make any false statement or conceal any material fact in response to this audit is punishable by fine or imprisonment (see 18 U.S.C. § 1001; see also 47 C.F.R. § 1.17), and/or revocation of any station license or construction permit [47 U.S. Code § 312(a)(1)], and/or forfeiture (47 U.S.C. § 503). Failure to respond to this audit letter by the deadline is also punishable by sanctions against the licensee, in accordance with 47 C.F.R. § 73.2080(g). Should you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact the EEO Staff at (202)
• http://www.fcc.gov/mb/policy/eeo/auditletterjune10.doc
  • or an officer of the station. Send the response to EEO Staff, Policy Division, Media Bureau, Federal Communications Commission, 445 12th Street, S.W., Washington, DC 20554. To knowingly and willfully make any false statement or conceal any material fact in response to this audit is punishable by fine or imprisonment (see 18 U.S.C. § 1001; see also 47 C.F.R. § 1.17), and/or revocation of any station license or construction permit [47 U.S. Code § 312(a)(1)], and/or forfeiture (47 U.S.C. § 503). Failure to respond to this audit letter by the deadline is punishable by sanctions against the licensee, in accordance with 47 C.F.R. § 73.2080(g). Should you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact the EEO Staff at (202) 418-1450.
• http://www.fcc.gov/mb/policy/eeo/auditletterjune12.doc
  • or other principal of the licensee. Send the response to EEO Staff, Policy Division, Media Bureau, Federal Communications Commission, 445 12th Street, S.W., Washington, DC 20554. To knowingly and willfully make any false statement or conceal any material fact in response to this audit is punishable by fine or imprisonment (see 18 U.S.C. § 1001; see also 47 C.F.R. § 1.17), and/or revocation of any station license or construction permit [47 U.S. Code § 312(a)(1)], and/or forfeiture (47 U.S.C. § 503). Failure to respond to this audit letter by the deadline is also punishable by sanctions against the licensee, in accordance with 47 C.F.R. § 73.2080(g). Should you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact the EEO Staff at (202)
• http://www.fcc.gov/mb/policy/eeo/auditletteroct4.doc
  • of the owner of the unit. Send the response to EEO Staff, Policy Division, Media Bureau, Federal Communications Commission, 445 12th Street, S.W., Washington, DC 20554. To knowingly and willfully make any false statement or conceal any material fact in response to this audit is punishable by fine or imprisonment (see 18 U.S.C. § 1001; see also 47 C.F.R. § 1.17), and/or forfeiture (47 U.S.C. § 503). Failure to respond to this audit letter by the deadline noted above is punishable by sanctions against the unit, in accordance with 47 C.F.R. § 76.77(f). A failure to respond may also result in a certification that the unit is not in compliance with the Commission's EEO rules for 2007. Should you have any
• http://www.fcc.gov/mb/policy/eeo/auditlettersept29.doc
  • or an officer of the station. Send the response to EEO Staff, Policy Division, Media Bureau, Federal Communications Commission, 445 12th Street, S.W., Washington, DC 20554. To knowingly and willfully make any false statement or conceal any material fact in response to this audit is punishable by fine or imprisonment (see 18 U.S.C. § 1001; see also 47 C.F.R. § 1.17), and/or revocation of any station license or construction permit [47 U.S. Code § 312(a)(1)], and/or forfeiture (47 U.S.C. § 503). Failure to respond to this audit letter by the deadline is also punishable by sanctions against the licensee, in accordance with 47 C.F.R. § 73.2080(g). Should you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact the EEO Staff at (202)
• http://www.fcc.gov/ogc/documents/opinions/2000/98-1516.doc http://www.fcc.gov/ogc/documents/opinions/2000/98-1516.html
  • during the renewal proceedings. }{\i\fs22\insrsid744098 See Decision}{\fs22\insrsid744098 , 13 F.C.C.R. at 15,038. Moreover, because these occurred in the course of the agency's own proceedings, they were a rationale for nonrenewal that went beyond the felony conviction alone. }{\i\fs22\insrsid744098 See id. }{\fs22\insrsid744098 Commission regulations forbid applicants from "mak[ing] any misrepresentation or willful material omission bearing on any matter...." 47 C.F.R. \'a7 1.17; }{\i\fs22\insrsid744098 see also}{\fs22\insrsid744098 47 U.S.C. \'a7 312(a)(1). A licensee's complete candor is important to the FCC because "effective regulation is premised upon the agency's ability to depend upon the representations made to it by its licensees." }{\i\fs22\insrsid744098 Leflore Broad. Co. v. FCC}{ \fs22\insrsid744098 , 636 F.2d 454, 461 (D.C. Cir. 1980); }{\i\fs22\insrsid744098 see also Character Policy}{\fs22\insrsid744098 , 5 F.C.C.R. at
• http://www.fcc.gov/ogc/documents/opinions/2005/01-1072-020405.pdf
  • [47 C.F.R. § 73.1015]." 16 F.C.C.R. at 6 4 Section 73.1015 provides that "[t]he Commission or its representatives may, in writing, require from any applicant, permittee, or licensee written statements of fact relevant to a determination whether an application should be granted or denied" and that "[a]ny such statements of fact are subject to the provisions of [47 C.F.R.] § 1.17." Section 1.17, in turn, directs that "no person . . . shall . . . [i]n any written or oral statement of fact, intentionally provide material factual information that is incorrect or intentionally omit material information that is necessary to prevent any material factual statement that is made from being incorrect or misleading" or "[i]n any written statement of fact,
• http://www.fcc.gov/omd/privacyact/System_of_records/pia-broadband-dead-zone-report.pdf
  • another SORN? Yes No If yes, please explain what has occurred: If this information system has been a component or a subset of another System of Records Notice (SORN), what is the SORN of which it is now or was previously a component or subset: Please also provide the citation that was published in the Federal Register for the SORN: 1.17 What are the purposes or functions that make it necessary to create a new a system of records notice (SORN) for this information system, e.g., why is the information being collected? 1.18 Where is this information for the system of records notice (SORN) located? 1.19 Is the use of the information both relevant and necessary to the purposes for which
• http://www.fcc.gov/omd/privacyact/System_of_records/pia-ccd.pdf
  • Comment Cards and/or the comment paper sheet will be coverd by a new system of records notice, FCC/PSHSB-1, "Comment Card Database." What is the System of Records Notice (SORN) of which it is currently or previously a component or subset: This is a new SORN. Please also provide the citation that was published in the Federal Register for the SORN: 1.17 What are the purposes or functions that make it necessary to create a new a system of records notice (SORN) for this information system, e.g., why is the information being collected? A new SORN needs to be created to cover the personally identifiable information that individuals may submit voluntarily via the PSHSB Comment Card Database information system. PSHSB may use
• http://www.fcc.gov/omd/privacyact/System_of_records/pia-core-financial.pdf
  • exist as a component or subset of another SORN? Yes No If yes, please explain what has occurred: The CFSR will be a new information system. What is the System of Records Notice (SORN) of which it is currently or previously a component or subset: Please also provide the citation that was published in the Federal Register for the SORN: 1.17 What are the purposes or functions that make it necessary to create a new a system of records notice (SORN) for this information system, e.g., why is the information being collected? A new SORN needs to be created based on developing a new financial system and new business processes for payment activities. 1.18 Where is this information for the system
• http://www.fcc.gov/omd/privacyact/System_of_records/pia-criminal-investigative-files.pdf
  • or does it now, or did it previously exist as a component or subset of another SORN? Yes No If yes, please explain what has occurred: What is the System of Records Notice (SORN) of which it is currently or previously a component or subset: Please also provide the citation that was published in the Federal Register for the SORN: 1.17 What are the purposes or functions that make it necessary to create a new a system of records notice (SORN) for this information system, e.g., why is the information being collected? 1.18 Where is this information for the system of records notice (SORN) located? 1.19 Is the use of the information both relevant and necessary to the purposes for which
• http://www.fcc.gov/omd/privacyact/System_of_records/pia-crisis.pdf
  • or does it now, or did it previously exist as a component or subset of another SORN? Yes No If yes, please explain what has occurred: What is the System of Records Notice (SORN) of which it is currently or previously a component or subset: Please also provide the citation that was published in the Federal Register for the SORN: 1.17 What are the purposes or functions that make it necessary to create a new a system of records notice (SORN) for this information system, e.g., why is the information being collected? 1.18 Where is this information for the system of records notice (SORN) located? 1.19 Is the use of the information both relevant and necessary to the purposes for which
• http://www.fcc.gov/omd/privacyact/System_of_records/pia-dqc.pdf
  • or does it now, or did it previously exist as a component or subset of another SORN? Yes No If yes, please explain what has occurred: What is the System of Records Notice (SORN) of which it is currently or previously a component or subset: Please also provide the citation that was published in the Federal Register for the SORN: 1.17 What are the purposes or functions that make it necessary to create a new a system of records notice (SORN) for this information system, e.g., why is the information being collected? 1.18 Where is this information for the system of records notice (SORN) located? 11 1.19 Is the use of the information both relevant and necessary to the purposes for
• http://www.fcc.gov/omd/privacyact/System_of_records/pia-ecfs.pdf
  • does it now, or did it previously exist as a component or subset of another SORN? Yes No If yes, please explain what has occurred: What is the System of Records Notice (SORN) of which it is currently or previously a component or subset: Please also provide the citation that was published in the Federal Register for the SORN: 11 1.17 What are the purposes or functions that make it necessary to create a new a system of records notice (SORN) for this information system, e.g., why is the information being collected? 1.18 Where is this information for the system of records notice (SORN) located? 1.19 Is the use of the information both relevant and necessary to the purposes for which
• http://www.fcc.gov/omd/privacyact/System_of_records/pia-email.pdf
  • or does it now, or did it previously exist as a component or subset of another SORN? Yes No If yes, please explain what has occurred: What is the System of Records Notice (SORN) of which it is currently or previously a component or subset: Please also provide the citation that was published in the Federal Register for the SORN: 1.17 What are the purposes or functions that make it necessary to create a new a system of records notice (SORN) for this information system, e.g., why is the information being collected? 1.18 Where is this information for the system of records notice (SORN) located? 1.19 Is the use of the information both relevant and necessary to the purposes for which
• http://www.fcc.gov/omd/privacyact/System_of_records/pia-experimental-radio.pdf
  • or does it now, or did it previously exist as a component or subset of another SORN? Yes No If yes, please explain what has occurred: What is the System of Records Notice (SORN) of which it is currently or previously a component or subset: Please also provide the citation that was published in the Federal Register for the SORN: 1.17 What are the purposes or functions that make it necessary to create a new a system of records notice (SORN) for this information system, e.g., why is the information being collected? 1.18 Where is this information for the system of records notice (SORN) located? 1.19 Is the use of the information both relevant and necessary to the purposes for which
• http://www.fcc.gov/omd/privacyact/System_of_records/pia-faca.pdf
  • or does it now, or did it previously exist as a component or subset of another SORN? Yes No If yes, please explain what has occurred: What is the System of Records Notice (SORN) of which it is currently or previously a component or subset: Please also provide the citation that was published in the Federal Register for the SORN: 1.17 What are the purposes or functions that make it necessary to create a new a system of records notice (SORN) for this information system, e.g., why is the information being collected? 1.18 Where is this information for the system of records notice (SORN) located? 11 1.19 Is the use of the information both relevant and necessary to the purposes for
• http://www.fcc.gov/omd/privacyact/System_of_records/pia-financial.pdf
  • occurred: It existed as a component of another SORN. A new SORN will be created. What is the System of Records Notice (SORN) of which it is currently or previously a component or subset: The information previously covered by FCC/OMD-30, "Financial Accounting Information Systems (FAIS)." Please also provide the citation that was published in the Federal Register for the SORN: 1.17 What are the purposes or functions that make it necessary to create a new a system of records notice (SORN) for this information system, e.g., why is the information being collected? The new SORN is needed to be created to separate the business processes. 1.18 Where is this information for the system of records notice (SORN) located? Office of the
• http://www.fcc.gov/omd/privacyact/System_of_records/pia-foia.pdf
  • or does it now, or did it previously exist as a component or subset of another SORN? Yes No If yes, please explain what has occurred: What is the System of Records Notice (SORN) of which it is currently or previously a component or subset: Please also provide the citation that was published in the Federal Register for the SORN: 1.17 What are the purposes or functions that make it necessary to create a new a system of records notice (SORN) for this information system, e.g., why is the information being collected? 1.18 Where is this information for the system of records notice (SORN) located? 1.19 Is the use of the information both relevant and necessary to the purposes for which
• http://www.fcc.gov/omd/privacyact/System_of_records/pia-general-investigative-files.pdf
  • or does it now, or did it previously exist as a component or subset of another SORN? Yes No If yes, please explain what has occurred: What is the System of Records Notice (SORN) of which it is currently or previously a component or subset: Please also provide the citation that was published in the Federal Register for the SORN: 1.17 What are the purposes or functions that make it necessary to create a new a system of records notice (SORN) for this information system, e.g., why is the information being collected? 1.18 Where is this information for the system of records notice (SORN) located? 1.19 Is the use of the information both relevant and necessary to the purposes for which
• http://www.fcc.gov/omd/privacyact/System_of_records/pia-ils.pdf
  • or does it now, or did it previously exist as a component or subset of another SORN? Yes No If yes, please explain what has occurred: What is the System of Records Notice (SORN) of which it is currently or previously a component or subset: Please also provide the citation that was published in the Federal Register for the SORN: 1.17 What are the purposes or functions that make it necessary to create a new a system of records notice (SORN) for this information system, e.g., why is the information being collected? 1.18 Where is this information for the system of records notice (SORN) located? 1.19 Is the use of the information both relevant and necessary to the purposes for which
• http://www.fcc.gov/omd/privacyact/System_of_records/pia-investigations-hearings.pdf
  • does it now, or did it previously exist as a component or subset of another SORN? Yes No If yes, please explain what has occurred: What is the System of Records Notice (SORN) of which it is currently or previously a component or subset: Please also provide the citation that was published in the Federal Register for the SORN: 11 1.17 What are the purposes or functions that make it necessary to create a new a system of records notice (SORN) for this information system, e.g., why is the information being collected? 1.18 Where is this information for the system of records notice (SORN) located? 1.19 Is the use of the information both relevant and necessary to the purposes for which
• http://www.fcc.gov/omd/privacyact/System_of_records/pia-labor-employee-relations.pdf
  • or does it now, or did it previously exist as a component or subset of another SORN? Yes No If yes, please explain what has occurred: What is the System of Records Notice (SORN) of which it is currently or previously a component or subset: Please also provide the citation that was published in the Federal Register for the SORN: 1.17 What are the purposes or functions that make it necessary to create a new a system of records notice (SORN) for this information system, e.g., why is the information being collected? 1.18 Where is this information for the system of records notice (SORN) located? 11 1.19 Is the use of the information both relevant and necessary to the purposes for
• http://www.fcc.gov/omd/privacyact/System_of_records/pia-lmts.pdf
  • of which it is currently or previously a component or subset: The FCC is going to create a new system of records notice, FCC/OLA-1, "Legislative Management Tracking System (LMTS), to cover the personnally identifiable information that the LMTS information system collects, uses, maintains, and stores. Please also provide the citation that was published in the Federal Register for the SORN: 1.17 What are the purposes or functions that make it necessary to create a new a system of records notice (SORN) for this information system? The Office of Legislative Affairs (OLA) uses the Legislative Management Tracking System (LMTS) to track the correspondence that OLA receives from Congress. This correspondence may include attachments from parties outside the FCC that contain personally identifiable
• http://www.fcc.gov/omd/privacyact/System_of_records/pia-pams.pdf
  • has no links to other FCC or non-FCC information systems. What is the System of Records Notice (SORN) of which it is currently or previously a component or subset: This will be a new system of records notice (SORN), FCC/OMD-26, "Personnel Availability Management System (PAMS)." Please also provide the citation that was published in the Federal Register for the SORN: 1.17 What are the purposes or functions that make it necessary to create a new a system of records notice (SORN) for this information system, e.g., why is the information being collected? The PAMS information system was created in 2005 as an emergency system that is only used during a building or regional incident. The PAMS information system supports a Continuity
• http://www.fcc.gov/omd/privacyact/System_of_records/pia-pay-leave-garnish.pdf
  • or does it now, or did it previously exist as a component or subset of another SORN? Yes No If yes, please explain what has occurred: What is the System of Records Notice (SORN) of which it is currently or previously a component or subset: Please also provide the citation that was published in the Federal Register for the SORN: 1.17 What are the purposes or functions that make it necessary to create a new a system of records notice (SORN) for this information system, e.g., why is the information being collected? 1.18 Where is this information for the system of records notice (SORN) located? 1.19 Is the use of the information both relevant and necessary to the purposes for which
• http://www.fcc.gov/omd/privacyact/System_of_records/pia-personal-security-files.pdf
  • or does it now, or did it previously exist as a component or subset of another SORN? Yes No If yes, please explain what has occurred: What is the System of Records Notice (SORN) of which it is currently or previously a component or subset: Please also provide the citation that was published in the Federal Register for the SORN: 1.17 What are the purposes or functions that make it necessary to create a new a system of records notice (SORN) for this information system, e.g., why is the information being collected? 1.18 Where is this information for the system of records notice (SORN) located? 1.19 Is the use of the information both relevant and necessary to the purposes for which
• http://www.fcc.gov/omd/privacyact/System_of_records/pia-physical-access.pdf
  • or does it now, or did it previously exist as a component or subset of another SORN? Yes No If yes, please explain what has occurred: What is the System of Records Notice (SORN) of which it is currently or previously a component or subset: Please also provide the citation that was published in the Federal Register for the SORN: 1.17 What are the purposes or functions that make it necessary to create a new a system of records notice (SORN) for this information system, e.g., why is the information being collected? 1.18 Where is this information for the system of records notice (SORN) located? 11 1.19 Is the use of the information both relevant and necessary to the purposes for
• http://www.fcc.gov/omd/privacyact/System_of_records/pia-reasonable-accommodation-requests.pdf
  • or does it now, or did it previously exist as a component or subset of another SORN? Yes No If yes, please explain what has occurred: What is the System of Records Notice (SORN) of which it is currently or previously a component or subset: Please also provide the citation that was published in the Federal Register for the SORN: 1.17 What are the purposes or functions that make it necessary to create a new a system of records notice (SORN) for this information system, e.g., why is the information being collected? 1.18 Where is this information for the system of records notice (SORN) located? 11 1.19 Is the use of the information both relevant and necessary to the purposes for
• http://www.fcc.gov/omd/privacyact/System_of_records/pia-remedy.pdf
  • does it now, or did it previously exist as a component or subset of another SORN? Yes No If yes, please explain what has occurred: 10 What is the System of Records Notice (SORN) of which it is currently or previously a component or subset: Please also provide the citation that was published in the Federal Register for the SORN: 1.17 What are the purposes or functions that make it necessary to create a new a system of records notice (SORN) for this information system, e.g., why is the information being collected? 1.18 Where is this information for the system of records notice (SORN) located? 1.19 Is the use of the information both relevant and necessary to the purposes for which
• http://www.fcc.gov/omd/privacyact/System_of_records/pia-rmis.pdf
  • exist as a component or subset of another SORN? Yes No If yes, please explain what has occurred: This is a new system of records notice. What is the System of Records Notice (SORN) of which it is currently or previously a component or subset: Please also provide the citation that was published in the Federal Register for the SORN: 1.17 What are the purposes or functions that make it necessary to create a new a system of records notice (SORN) for this information system, e.g., why is the information being collected? The staff in the Financial Division of the Office of the Managing Director (OMD-FO) have created a new SORN to cover the new RMIS information system, FCC/OMD-25, "Revenue Management
• http://www.fcc.gov/omd/privacyact/System_of_records/pia-small-business-contacts.pdf
  • does it now, or did it previously exist as a component or subset of another SORN? Yes No If yes, please explain what has occurred: What is the System of Records Notice (SORN) of which it is currently or previously a component or subset: Please also provide the citation that was published in the Federal Register for the SORN: 11 1.17 What are the purposes or functions that make it necessary to create a new a system of records notice (SORN) for this information system, e.g., why is the information being collected? 1.18 Where is this information for the system of records notice (SORN) located? 1.19 Is the use of the information both relevant and necessary to the purposes for which
• http://www.fcc.gov/omd/privacyact/System_of_records/pia-telephone-call-details.pdf
  • or does it now, or did it previously exist as a component or subset of another SORN? Yes No If yes, please explain what has occurred: What is the System of Records Notice (SORN) of which it is currently or previously a component or subset: Please also provide the citation that was published in the Federal Register for the SORN: 1.17 What are the purposes or functions that make it necessary to create a new a system of records notice (SORN) for this information system, e.g., why is the information being collected? 1.18 Where is this information for the system of records notice (SORN) located? 12 1.19 Is the use of the information both relevant and necessary to the purposes for
• http://www.fcc.gov/omd/privacyact/System_of_records/pia-transit.pdf
  • does it now, or did it previously exist as a component or subset of another SORN? Yes No If yes, please explain what has occurred: 11 What is the System of Records Notice (SORN) of which it is currently or previously a component or subset: Please also provide the citation that was published in the Federal Register for the SORN: 1.17 What are the purposes or functions that make it necessary to create a new a system of records notice (SORN) for this information system, e.g., why is the information being collected? 1.18 Where is this information for the system of records notice (SORN) located? 1.19 Is the use of the information both relevant and necessary to the purposes for which
• http://www.fcc.gov/omd/privacyact/System_of_records/pia-uls.pdf
  • or does it now, or did it previously exist as a component or subset of another SORN? Yes No If yes, please explain what has occurred: What is the System of Records Notice (SORN) of which it is currently or previously a component or subset: Please also provide the citation that was published in the Federal Register for the SORN: 1.17 What are the purposes or functions that make it necessary to create a new a system of records notice (SORN) for this information system, e.g., why is the information being collected? 1.18 Where is this information for the system of records notice (SORN) located? 1.19 Is the use of the information both relevant and necessary to the purposes for which
• http://www.fcc.gov/omd/privacyact/System_of_records/pia-violators.pdf
  • does it now, or did it previously exist as a component or subset of another SORN? Yes No 11 If yes, please explain what has occurred: What is the System of Records Notice (SORN) of which it is currently or previously a component or subset: Please also provide the citation that was published in the Federal Register for the SORN: 1.17 What are the purposes or functions that make it necessary to create a new a system of records notice (SORN) for this information system, e.g., why is the information being collected? 1.18 Where is this information for the system of records notice (SORN) located? 1.19 Is the use of the information both relevant and necessary to the purposes for which
• http://www.fcc.gov/omd/privacyact/System_of_records/pshsb-coop-plan.pdf
  • does it now, or did it previously exist as a component or subset of another SORN? Yes No If yes, please explain what has occurred: What is the System of Records Notice (SORN) of which it is currently or previously a component or subset: Please also provide the citation that was published in the Federal Register for the SORN: 10 1.17 What are the purposes or functions that make it necessary to create a new a system of records notice (SORN) for this information system, e.g., why is the information being collected? 1.18 Where is this information for the system of records notice (SORN) located? 1.19 Is the use of the information both relevant and necessary to the purposes for which
• http://www.fcc.gov/omd/privacyact/System_of_records/pta-broadband-dead-zone-report.pdf
  • 1.16. What is the potential impact or "security risk" for the information that is maintained in the information system if an unauthorized disclosure or misuse of information occurs? (check one) Results in little or no harm, embarrassment, inconvenience, or unfairness. Results in moderate harm, embarrassment, inconvenience, or unfairness. Results in significant harm, embarrassment, inconvenient, or unfairness. Please explain your response: 1.17 Is this impact level consistent with the guidelines as determined by the FIPS 199 assessment? Yes No Please explain your response: The Broadband Dead Zone Report and Consumer Broadband Test information system is a "non major" information system, and as such, it is exempt from the FIPS assessment guidelines. 1.18 When was "Certification and Accreditation" (C&A) last completed? The Broadband
• http://www.fcc.gov/omd/privacyact/System_of_records/pta-ccd.pdf
  • one) Results in little or no harm, embarrassment, inconvenience, or unfairness. Results in moderate harm, embarrassment, inconvenience, or unfairness. Results in significant harm, embarrassment, inconvenient, or unfairness. Please explain your response: The information that each submitter may provide and that is done voluntarily will only consists of the business contact information, i.e., name, company telephone number, company e-mail address, etc. 1.17 Is this impact level consistent with the guidelines as determined by the FIPS 199 assessment? Yes No Please explain your response: The PSHSB Comment Card Database information system has not been given a FIPS 199 assessment. 1.18 When was "Certification and Accreditation" (C&A) last completed? The C&A for PSHSB Comment Card Database information system has not been done yet. 1.19
• http://www.fcc.gov/omd/privacyact/System_of_records/pta-clarity.pdf
  • harm, embarrassment, inconvenience, or unfairness. Results in moderate harm, embarrassment, inconvenience, or unfairness. Results in significant harm, embarrassment, inconvenient, or unfairness. Please explain your response: As noted above, Clarity is designed to measure aggregate IT funding/performance metrics. It does not involve any PII data. Therefore, an inadvertent breach of information is likely to pose only minimal impacts or security risks. 1.17 Is this impact level consistent with the guidelines as determined by the FIPS 199 assessment? Yes No Please explain your response: The security review is underway and will be completed in FY2010. 1.18 When was "Certification and Accreditation" (C&A) last completed? Clarity is a new application in the FCC inventory. IT Infrastructure Security group is performing a security review on
• http://www.fcc.gov/omd/privacyact/System_of_records/pta-core-financial.pdf
  • Results in little or no harm, embarrassment, inconvenience, or unfairness. Results in moderate harm, embarrassment, inconvenience, or unfairness. Results in significant harm, embarrassment, inconvenient, or unfairness. Please explain your response: The CFSR will include not only PII such as SSNs in the data it collects, maintains, and uses, CFSR will also collect, maintain, and use confidential or sensitive financial data. 1.17 Is this impact level consistent with the guidelines as determined by the FIPS 199 assessment? Yes No Please explain your response: At this stage in its development, the CFSR has not received its FIPS 199 assessment. 1.18 When was "Certification and Accreditation" (C&A) last completed? At this stage in its development, the CFSR has not received its C&A. 1.19 Has
• http://www.fcc.gov/omd/privacyact/System_of_records/pta-lmts.pdf
  • occurs? (check one) [maybe I confused you, but 1.15 and 1.16 were supposed to be an "either/or" response-if the information system has PII, complete 1.15, if non, complete 1.16] 12 Results in little or no harm, embarrassment, inconvenience, or unfairness. Results in moderate harm, embarrassment, inconvenience, or unfairness. Results in significant harm, embarrassment, inconvenient, or unfairness. Please explain your response: 1.17 Is this impact level consistent with the guidelines as determined by the FIPS 199 assessment? Yes No Please explain your response: The LMTS information system is a "non major" information system, and as such, it is exempt for the FIPS 199 assessment guidelines. 1.18 When was "Certification and Accreditation" (C&A) last completed? The latest C&A package was signed off in
• http://www.fcc.gov/omd/privacyact/System_of_records/pta-pams.pdf
  • for the information that is maintained in the information system if an unauthorized disclosure or misuse of information occurs? (check one) Results in little or no harm, embarrassment, inconvenience, or unfairness. Results in moderate harm, embarrassment, inconvenience, or unfairness. Results in significant harm, embarrassment, inconvenient, or unfairness. Please explain your response: [you don't need to answer both 1.15 and 1.16] 1.17 Is this impact level consistent with the guidelines as determined by the FIPS 199 assessment? Yes No Please explain your response: The PAMS information system is a "non major" information system, and as such, it is exempt from the FIPS assessment guidelines. 1.18 When was "Certification and Accreditation" (C&A) last completed? PAMS is a minor information system, and no C&A
• http://www.fcc.gov/omd/privacyact/System_of_records/pta-rmis.pdf
  • harm, embarrassment, inconvenience, or unfairness. Results in significant harm, embarrassment, inconvenient, or unfairness. Please explain your response: The RMIS also contains non-PII that individuals, businesses, institutions, etc., provide to the FCC when these entities register to pay regulatory fees, apply for or renew a license, etc., including business information that business registrants provide, i.e., credit card data, bank accounts, etc. 1.17 Is this impact level consistent with the guidelines as determined by the FIPS 199 assessment? Yes No Please explain your response: 1.18 When was "Certification and Accreditation" (C&A) last completed? The C&A was completed in 2007. 1.19 Has the Chief Information Officer (CIO) and/or the Chief Security Officer designated this information system as requiring an Independent risk assessment Independent security
• http://www.fcc.gov/transaction/att-comcast/jtconsumer_reply060502.pdf
  • of the Status of Competition in the Market for the Delivery of Video Programming, Eighth Report, January 14, Tables D-1, D-2, D-3, Cahiers, TVInsite, Network Subscriber Counts, September 17, 2001.This is computed as Cable networks = Millions of Subscribers, total is 4.9 billion Each broadcast network (in bold) is set at all TV households 105. Total broadcast networks "subscribers" is 1.17 billion. I got this from database (# of independent owners in each DMA times TV households per DMA. Subscribers in joint ventures are attributed to the larger partner. Arrows point in the direction in which subscribers are attributed to owners. Cable subscribers are in italics. 55 In essence, with Retransmission/Must Carry, broadcast has bargaining power equal to or greater than
• http://www.fcc.gov/transaction/comsat-telenor/fcc01-369.pdf
  • orders, legal process, statutory authorizations, and certifications for interception of, access to or disclosure of Domestic Communications, Call Associated Data, Transactional Data or Subscriber Information authorized by U.S. federal, state or local law. 1.16 "MES" means a mobile earth station (i.e., a hand-held, portable or other mobile terminal capable of receiving and/or transmitting Wire Communications or Electronic Communications by satellite). 1.17 "Non U.S.-Licensed MES" means an Inmarsat MES other than a U.S.-Licensed MES. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION FCC 01-369 31 1.18 "Party" or "Parties" have the meaning given in the Preamble. 1.19 "Pro forma assignments" or "pro forma transfers of control" are transfers or assignments that do not "involve a substantial change in ownership or control" of the licenses as provided in
• http://www.fcc.gov/transaction/documents/fcc00091.pdf
  • raise section 271 issues, including but not limited to the Applicants' post-divestiture use of in-region Internet backbone. See, e.g., MCI Worldcom Comments at 3, 6-7; Allegiance Reply Comments at 5. 9 We expect the Applicants to be both truthful and forthcoming in responding to any Commission request for information deemed necessary to review the divestiture plan. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.17 requiring truthful written statements and responses to Commission inquiries and correspondence ("No applicant, permittee or licensee shall in any response to Commission correspondence or inquiry or in any application, pleading, report or any other 3 Federal Communications Commission FCC 00-91 the report on public notice and invite all interested parties to comment. The divestiture report must be complete and all
• http://www.fcc.gov/transaction/intelsat-comsat/lrt_mot072202.pdf
  • deal truthfully and accurately with the Commission at all times. Order, fn. 29 [second], emphasis added. The Commission stated that it found no basis ìat this timeî to question Comsatís basic qualifications or to grant LRTís request for reconsideration because of this ìincident.î Id. The Commission did refer the matter to the Enforcement Bureau to determine its non-compliance with Section 1.17 of the Rules. However, the Commission observed that ì in light of the fact that the statute of limitations for forfeiture has passed,î such further action would necessarily be of a limited nature. Id. LRT filed its Petition in August 2000, and its Supplement related to Comsatís false license false declaration in March 2001. No reason is offered in the
• http://www.fcc.gov/transaction/intelsat-comsat/lrt_petdeny052402.pdf
  • transfer its licenses to a third party such as Intelsat. The Commission has observed that fraud "is a subject area the Commission has traditionally considered to be pertinent to its evaluation of a licensee's character." Decision, 13 F.C.C.R. at 15,038. Commission regulations specifically forbid applicants from "mak[ing] any misrepresentation or willful material omission bearing on any matter...." 47 C.F.R. ß 1.17; see also 47 U.S.C. ß 312(a)(1). The Commission has found that a licensee's complete candor is important because "effective regulation is premised upon the agency's ability to depend upon the representations made to it by its licensees." Leflore Broad. Co. v. Commission, 636 F.2d 454, 461 (D.C. Cir. 1980); see also Character Policy, 5 F.C.C.R. at 3253. It is well
• http://www.fcc.gov/transaction/intelsat-comsat/lrt_suppl062302.pdf
  • and its members, based upon fraud, deception and misrepresentation. 12 The Commission has observed that fraud "is a subject area the Commission has traditionally considered to be pertinent to its evaluation of a licensee's character." Decision, 13 F.C.C.R. at 15,038. Commission regulations specifically forbid applicants from "mak[ing] any misrepresentation or willful material omission bearing on any matter...." 47 C.F.R. ß 1.17; see also 47 U.S.C. ß 312(a)(1). The Commission has found that a licensee's complete candor is important because "effective regulation is premised upon the agency's ability to depend upon the representations made to it by its licensees." Leflore Broad. Co. v. Commission, 636 F.2d 454, 461 (D.C. Cir. 1980); see also Character Policy, 5 F.C.C.R. at 3253. It is well
• http://www.fcc.gov/transaction/univision/ricon091106b.pdf
  • faith. Accordingly, the Commission should hold a hearing to further investigate Univision's actions, especially in light of its market dominance. B. Univision continually utilizes foreign programming and syndicated content that do no meet the needs of its American communities of license. 19 Univision acquired KTFQ(TV) in 2003. See File Nos. BALCT-20030313BCD. 20 Arguably, Univision was also in violation of Section 1.17(a), which directs that "no person . . . shall . . . in any written or oral statement of fact, intentionally provide material factual information that is incorrect or intentionally omit material information that is necessary to prevent any material factual statement that is made from being incorrect or misleading" or "in any written statement of fact, provide material factual