FCC Web Documents citing 1.1622

as compiled by hallikainen.com/FccRules on 2012 07 01

• http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/25/releases/fc980194.pdf http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/25/releases/fc980194.txt http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/25/releases/fc980194.wp
  • aggregate hold more than 50% of the ownership interests in no other media of mass communications receive a two-to-one lottery preference, and applicants whose owners in the aggregate hold more than 50% of the ownership interests in one, two or three other media of mass communications receive a one and a half to one lottery preference. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1622(b). These 230 preferences are not available to entities holding more than 50% of the ownership interests in certain local media services. We will use these rules with two adjustments: (1) we will add an explicit requirement that the rules 231 cover de facto controlling interests, as well as interests of more than 50% of the ownership interests; and (2) to
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/25/releases/fc990074.pdf http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/25/releases/fc990074.txt http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/25/releases/fc990074.wp
  • aggregate held more than 50% of the ownership interests in no other media of mass communications received a two-to-one lottery preference, and applicants whose owners in the aggregate held more than 50% of the ownership interests in one, two or three other media of mass communications received a one and a half to one lottery preference. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1622(b). No lottery preference was available to applicants holding more than 50% of the ownership interests in mass media facilities serving the same area as the applicant's proposed LPTV, television translator or MDS station. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1622(e). This "recognizable" interest standard utilized in LPTV lotteries differed from the standards developed under the 109 Commission's general broadcast rules and policies
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/28/releases/fc980194.pdf http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/28/releases/fc980194.txt http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/28/releases/fc980194.wp
  • aggregate hold more than 50% of the ownership interests in no other media of mass communications receive a two-to-one lottery preference, and applicants whose owners in the aggregate hold more than 50% of the ownership interests in one, two or three other media of mass communications receive a one and a half to one lottery preference. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1622(b). These 230 preferences are not available to entities holding more than 50% of the ownership interests in certain local media services. We will use these rules with two adjustments: (1) we will add an explicit requirement that the rules 231 cover de facto controlling interests, as well as interests of more than 50% of the ownership interests; and (2) to
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/28/releases/fc990074.pdf http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/28/releases/fc990074.txt http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/28/releases/fc990074.wp
  • aggregate held more than 50% of the ownership interests in no other media of mass communications received a two-to-one lottery preference, and applicants whose owners in the aggregate held more than 50% of the ownership interests in one, two or three other media of mass communications received a one and a half to one lottery preference. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1622(b). No lottery preference was available to applicants holding more than 50% of the ownership interests in mass media facilities serving the same area as the applicant's proposed LPTV, television translator or MDS station. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1622(e). This "recognizable" interest standard utilized in LPTV lotteries differed from the standards developed under the 109 Commission's general broadcast rules and policies
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/32/releases/fc990074.pdf http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/32/releases/fc990074.txt http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/32/releases/fc990074.wp
  • aggregate held more than 50% of the ownership interests in no other media of mass communications received a two-to-one lottery preference, and applicants whose owners in the aggregate held more than 50% of the ownership interests in one, two or three other media of mass communications received a one and a half to one lottery preference. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1622(b). No lottery preference was available to applicants holding more than 50% of the ownership interests in mass media facilities serving the same area as the applicant's proposed LPTV, television translator or MDS station. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1622(e). This "recognizable" interest standard utilized in LPTV lotteries differed from the standards developed under the 109 Commission's general broadcast rules and policies
• http://www.fcc.gov/ogc/documents/opinions/2000/99-1183.doc http://www.fcc.gov/ogc/documents/opinions/2000/99-1183.html
  • a member or members of a \par minority group. \par \par }\pard \ql \li0\ri0\widctlpar\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0 {\fs24\insrsid3628136 Pub. L. No. 97-259, \'a7 115(c)(1), 96 Stat. 1087 (1982), (codified at 47 U.S.C. \'a7 309(i)(3)(A)). \par \par \tab Responding to this directive, the Commission issued a regulation granting preferences to minority applicants in lotteries for low\_power and translator television station licenses. 47 C.F.R. \'a7 1.1622(b). Low\_ power and translator television stations operate "on UHF channels at much lower power than full service (conventional) television stations." }{\i\fs24\insrsid3628136 Neighborhood TV Co., Inc. v. FCC}{\fs24\insrsid3628136 , 742 F.2d 629, 631 (D.C. Cir. 1984). Section 1.1622(b) of the Commission's regulations granted lottery preferences to "[a]pplicants, more than 50% of whose ownership interests are held by members of minority groups."