FCC Web Documents citing 1.1407

as compiled by hallikainen.com/FccRules on 2012 07 01

• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1332A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1332A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1332A1.txt
  • Cir. 1985) (per curiam); and Amendment of Rules and Policies Governing the Attachment of Cable Television Hardware to Utility Poles, 2 FCC Rcd 4387 (1987). See also, Implementation of Section 703(e) of the Telecommunications Act of 1996, 13 FCC Rcd 6777 (1998) and Amendment of Rules and Policies Governing Pole Attachments, FCC 00-116, 15 FCC Rcd 6453 (2000). 47 C.F.R. §1.1407(a). Id. 47 C.F.R. §1.1411. 47 C.F.R. §1.1409(a). See Amendment of Commission's Rules and Policies Governing Pole Attachments, CS Docket No. 97-98; Implementation of Section 703(e) of the Telecommunications Act of 1996, CS Docket No. 97-151, FCC 01-170 (released May 25, 2001). Alabama Cable Telecommunications Assoc., et al. v. Alabama Power Company, File No. PA 00-003, FCC 01-181 (released May 25,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1339A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1339A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1339A1.txt
  • being dismissed or not addressed. 6. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to Sections 0.321 and 1.1401-1.1418 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.321 and 1.1401-1.1418, that Respondent's Motion for Extension of Time IS GRANTED TO THE EXTENT INDICATED HEREIN. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION William H. Johnson Deputy Chief Cable Services Bureau 47 U.S.C. §224. 47 C.F.R. §§1.1401-1.1418. 47 C.F.R. § 1.1407(a). 47 U.S.C. § 224(b)(1) and (2). 47 U.S.C. §224 (b) (1). 47 U.S.C. § 224(b)(1). 47 C.F.R. §1.1407(a). Id. 47 C.F.R. §1.1411. 47 C.F.R. §1.1409(a). 47 C.F.R. § 1.46(a). Federal Communications Commission DA 01-1339 Federal Communications Commission DA 01-1339 ¥ ¦ î ï ð ñ ð ñ „0ý „0ý „0ý „0ý „0ý „0ý „0ý „`ú „0ý
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-610A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-610A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-610A1.txt
  • 1. In this Order, we consider a motion ("Motion"), filed by the above-captioned Complainant, for an extension of time to file a reply to a Response filed by the above-captioned Respondent. Complainant filed its Complaint on January 17, 2001, pursuant to 47 U.S.C. § 224. Respondent filed its Response on February 16, 2001. Under the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1407 (a), a reply from Complainant is due by March 8, 2001. Complainant requests that the time for filing a reply be extended to March 15, 2001. In support of its Motion, Complainant argues that it did not receive a copy of the Response until February 22, 2001. Complainant states that Respondent does not oppose its Motion. 2. It is the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-647A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-647A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-647A1.txt
  • Bell Atlantic-Maryland. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION William H. Johnson, Deputy Chief Cable Services Bureau 47 U.S.C. §224. 47 C.F.R. §§1.1401-1.1418. In the Matter of Cable Telecommunications Association of Maryland, Delaware and the District of Columbia, et. al, v. Baltimore Gas and Electric Company and Bell Atlantic-Maryland, Inc., File No. PA 00-001, DA 00-482, 15 FCC Rcd 4656 (2000). 47 C.F.R. § 1.1407 (a). Id. 47 C.F.R. § 1.1404 (l) (1999). See, for example, In the Matter of Mile Hi Cable Partners, et al. v. Public Service Company of Colorado, 14 FCC Rcd 3244 (1999) at ¶ 12. BGE filed various complaints for breach of contract or unjust enrichment with courts in the State of Maryland. Most of those actions have been stayed
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-440A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-440A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-440A1.txt
  • affect the rights of the parties, or any legal or factual issue in this proceeding. At any time, either party, upon a showing of good cause, may move to re-convert the inactive complaint back to an active complaint. Upon the grant of such a motion, Southwestern Bell will be required to file a Response to the Complaint pursuant to section 1.1407 of the Commission's rules, within 30 days following the issuance of an order re-converting the Complaint back to active status. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 224 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 154(i), 154(j), and 224, and sections 1.1401-1418 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1401-1.1418, and the authority
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-270A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-270A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-270A1.txt
  • and Bowen v. Georgetown University Hospital, 488 U.S. 204 (1988), Scalia, J., concurring). See, for example, Telecom Order at ¶¶ 10, 16-21; Consolidated Order at ¶ 13. See also, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1404 (k). Teleport also requested the information by letter to GPC at the same time it filed its complaint. See Reply at Exhibit 3. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1407 (". . . no other filings . . . will be considered unless authorized by the Commission."); and 47 C.F.R. § 1.1411 ("The Commission may decide each complaint upon the filings and information before it, may require one or more informal meetings with the parties to clarify the issues or to consider settlement of the dispute, or may, in its
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-173A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-173A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-173A1.txt
  • to any prima facie showing made by a complainant, with full legal and evidentiary support''). See Bureau Order, 12 FCC Rcd at 10366, ¶¶ 11-12; Complaint, Pietri Declaration at 1, ¶ 2; Response to Information Request at 1-3. Bureau Order, 12 FCC Rcd at 10371, ¶ 24; Application at 17. Alabama Power, 311 F.3d at 1371; see 47 C.F.R. § 1.1407 (``. . . no other filings . . . will be considered unless authorized by the Commission''); 47 C.F.R. § 1.1411 (``The Commission may decide each complaint upon the filings and information before it, may require one or more informal meetings with the parties to clarify the issues or to consider settlement of the dispute, or may, in its discretion,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-50A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-50A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-50A1.txt
  • Federal Regulations is amended as follows: The table of contents of Part 1 is revised to read as follows: * * * Subpart J-Pole Attachment Complaint Procedures 1.1401 Purpose. 1.1402 Definitions. 1.1403 Duty to provide access; modifications; notice of removal, increase or modification; petition for temporary stay; and cable operator notice. 1.1404 Complaint. 1.1405 File numbers. 1.1406 Dismissal of complaints. 1.1407 Response and reply. 1.1408 Numbers of copies and form of pleadings. 1.1409 Commission consideration of the complaint. 1.1410 Remedies. 1.1411 Meetings and hearings. 1.1412 Enforcement. 1.1413 Forfeiture. 1.1414 State certification. 1.1415 Other orders. 1.1416 Imputation of rates; modification costs. 1.1417 Allocation of Unusable Space Costs. 1.1418 Use of presumptions in calculating the space factor. 1.1420 Timeline for access to utility
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-96-325A1.pdf
  • 1 -- PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE 2. The table of contents of part 1 is revised to read as follows: * * * * * Subpart J - Pole Attachment Complaint Procedures 1.1401 Purpose. 1.1402 Definitions. 1.1403 Duty to provide access; modifications; notice of removal, increase or modification; petition for temporary stay. 1.1404 Complaint. 1.1405 File numbers. 1.1406 Dismissal of complaints. 1.1407 Response and reply. 1.1408 Number of copies and form of pleadings. 1.1409 Commission consideration of the complaint. 1.1410 Remedies. 1.1411 Meetings and hearings. 1.1412 Enforcement. 1.1413 Forfeiture. 1.1414 State certification. 1.1415 Other orders. 1.1416 Imputation of rates; modification costs. * * * * * 3. The authority citation for part 1 is revised to read as follows: AUTHORITY: 47 U.S.C.
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2002/FCC-02-270A1.html
  • (1994) and Bowen v. Georgetown University Hospital, 488 U.S. 204 (1988), Scalia, J., concurring). 45 See, for example, Telecom Order at 10, 16-21; Consolidated Order at 13. See also, 47 C.F.R. 1.1404 (k). 46 Teleport also requested the information by letter to GPC at the same time it filed its complaint. See Reply at Exhibit 3. 47 See 47 C.F.R. 1.1407 (". . . no other filings . . . will be considered unless authorized by the Commission."); and 47 C.F.R. 1.1411 ("The Commission may decide each complaint upon the filings and information before it, may require one or more informal meetings with the parties to clarify the issues or to consider settlement of the dispute, or may, in its discretion,
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2003/FCC-03-173A1.html
  • fully to any prima facie showing made by a complainant, with full legal and evidentiary support''). 62 See Bureau Order, 12 FCC Rcd at 10366, 11-12; Complaint, Pietri Declaration at 1, 2; Response to Information Request at 1-3. 63 Bureau Order, 12 FCC Rcd at 10371, 24; Application at 17. 64 Alabama Power, 311 F.3d at 1371; see 47 C.F.R. 1.1407 (``. . . no other filings . . . will be considered unless authorized by the Commission''); 47 C.F.R. 1.1411 (``The Commission may decide each complaint upon the filings and information before it, may require one or more informal meetings with the parties to clarify the issues or to consider settlement of the dispute, or may, in its discretion, order
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2005/DA-05-440A1.html
  • the rights of the parties, or any legal or factual issue in this proceeding. 6. At any time, either party, upon a showing of good cause, may move to re-convert the inactive complaint back to an active complaint. Upon the grant of such a motion, Southwestern Bell will be required to file a Response to the Complaint pursuant to section 1.1407 of the Commission's rules,15 within 30 days following the issuance of an order re-converting the Complaint back to active status. 7. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 224 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. 154(i), 154(j), and 224, and sections 1.1401-1418 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 1.1401-1.1418, and the authority delegated
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Cable/Orders/1999/da993011.doc
  • IS DENIED, but an extension of one week is GRANTED to January 6, 2000. This action is taken pursuant to delegated authority under Section 0.321 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. Section 0.321. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION William H. Johnson Deputy Chief, Cable Services Bureau Filed December 17, 1999. PA 99-005, filed November 30, 1999. Motion at 1. 47 C.F.R. § 1.1407(a). 47 C.F.R. § 1.4(b-e), (j). 47 C.F.R. § 1.46. Motion at 2-3. Opposition to Motion at 4. Opposition to Motion at 1-4. Id. at 4. 47 C.F.R. § 1.46(a). 47 C.F.R. § 1.46; see also, Fauch Cablevision of Colorado v. Public Service Company of Colorado, PA 91-003, 12 FCC Rcd 6034 (1997) (death in family of lead counsel warranted granting
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Cable/Orders/2000/da000482.doc
  • within thirty (30) days of the filing of the complaint. Under our rules, a response to the Complaint would be filed on or before March 3, 2000. It is the policy of the Commission that extensions of time shall not be routinely granted. BG&E has not provided us with any compelling reason that would warrant an extension of time. Section 1.1407(a) of our Rules provides for a response to a complaint and a reply by the complainant to the response, and further provides that "[e]xtensions of time to file are not contemplated unless justification is shown pursuant to Section 1.46 [and e]xcept as otherwise provided in Section 1.1403, no other filings, and no motions other than for extensions of time will
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Cable/Orders/2000/da001083.doc
  • Compliance Division, Cable Services Bureau: 1. In this Order, we consider a motion for extension of time to file a response ("Motion"), filed by Energy Northwest, Inc., ("Respondent"), to a complaint ("Complaint") filed by TCI Cablevision of Montana d/b/a AT&T Cable Services ("Complainant") on April 14, 2000 pursuant to 47 U.S.C. § 224. Under the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1407 (a), a response is due by May 15, 2000. The Motion was filed as an emergency motion pursuant to 47 C.F.R. § 1.46 on May 12, 2000. The Respondent requests that the time for responding to the Complaint be extended to May 24, 2000. In support of its Motion, Respondent argues that its counsel discovered a conflict of interest requiring
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Cable/Orders/2000/da001250.doc
  • ¶ 51. Local Competition Order at ¶ 1176. Id. at ¶ 1182. Id. at ¶ 1184. Id. at ¶1209. Local Competition Reconsideration Order at ¶ 16. Id. at ¶ 117. 47 C.F.R. § 1.1404 (n) (1999). See also Implementation of the Local Competition Provisions in the Telecommunications Act of 1996, FCC 96-325, 11 FCC Rcd 15499 (1996). 47 C.F.R. § 1.1407. See, for example, In the Matter of Mile Hi Cable Partners, et al. v. Public Aervice Company of Colorado, 14 FCC Rcd 3244 (1999) at ¶ 12. See Adoption of the Rules for the Regulation of Cable Television Pole Attachments, 68 F.C.C. 2d 1585 at ¶ 36 (1978). 47 C.F.R. § 1.1411. Id. Gulf Power, et al. v. FCC and
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Cable/Orders/2000/da001847.doc
  • 1. In this Order, we consider a motion ("Motion"), filed by the above-captioned Complainant, for an extension of time to file a reply to a Response filed by the above-captioned Respondent. Complainant filed its Complaint on June 23, 2000, pursuant to 47 U.S.C. § 224. Respondent filed its Response on July 14, 2000. Under the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1407 (a), a reply from Complainant is due by August 14, 2000. Complainant requests that the time for filing a reply be extended to September 5, 2000. In support of its Motion, Complainant argues that it has not received a complete copy of the Response because Respondent has redacted certain information that Respondent claims is confidential. Complainant further alleges that Complainant
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1996/fcc96325.pdf
  • 1 -- PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE 2. The table of contents of part 1 is revised to read as follows: * * * * * Subpart J - Pole Attachment Complaint Procedures 1.1401 Purpose. 1.1402 Definitions. 1.1403 Duty to provide access; modifications; notice of removal, increase or modification; petition for temporary stay. 1.1404 Complaint. 1.1405 File numbers. 1.1406 Dismissal of complaints. 1.1407 Response and reply. 1.1408 Number of copies and form of pleadings. 1.1409 Commission consideration of the complaint. 1.1410 Remedies. 1.1411 Meetings and hearings. 1.1412 Enforcement. 1.1413 Forfeiture. 1.1414 State certification. 1.1415 Other orders. 1.1416 Imputation of rates; modification costs. * * * * * 3. The authority citation for part 1 is revised to read as follows: AUTHORITY: 47 U.S.C.
• http://www.fcc.gov/Daily_Releases/Daily_Digest/1997/dd970917.html
  • SERVICES, INC. Granted a Joint Motion for Stay of Filing Deadlines. The filing deadlines are stayed for thirty (30) days, until September 22, 1997. The Cable Services Bureau found that because both parties have agreed and no harm results to the public, the equities jusify granting a stay of the filing deadlines. Pleading cycle rules, as set forth in section 1.1407, will resume in the above-referenced proceeding on September 22, 1997. Action by Bureau Chief. Adopted: September 15, 1997. by Order. (DA No. 97-1988). CSB Internet URL: [6]http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Cable/Orders/1997/da971988.txt JONES INTERCABLE, INC. Pursuant to a request filed by McDuffie County, GA, reviewed cost of service showing filed by Jones Intercable, Inc. Found Operator's basic service tier rate justified effective September 1, 1993.
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2002/FCC-02-270A1.html
  • (1994) and Bowen v. Georgetown University Hospital, 488 U.S. 204 (1988), Scalia, J., concurring). 45 See, for example, Telecom Order at 10, 16-21; Consolidated Order at 13. See also, 47 C.F.R. 1.1404 (k). 46 Teleport also requested the information by letter to GPC at the same time it filed its complaint. See Reply at Exhibit 3. 47 See 47 C.F.R. 1.1407 (". . . no other filings . . . will be considered unless authorized by the Commission."); and 47 C.F.R. 1.1411 ("The Commission may decide each complaint upon the filings and information before it, may require one or more informal meetings with the parties to clarify the issues or to consider settlement of the dispute, or may, in its discretion,
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2003/FCC-03-173A1.html
  • fully to any prima facie showing made by a complainant, with full legal and evidentiary support''). 62 See Bureau Order, 12 FCC Rcd at 10366, 11-12; Complaint, Pietri Declaration at 1, 2; Response to Information Request at 1-3. 63 Bureau Order, 12 FCC Rcd at 10371, 24; Application at 17. 64 Alabama Power, 311 F.3d at 1371; see 47 C.F.R. 1.1407 (``. . . no other filings . . . will be considered unless authorized by the Commission''); 47 C.F.R. 1.1411 (``The Commission may decide each complaint upon the filings and information before it, may require one or more informal meetings with the parties to clarify the issues or to consider settlement of the dispute, or may, in its discretion, order
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2005/DA-05-440A1.html
  • the rights of the parties, or any legal or factual issue in this proceeding. 6. At any time, either party, upon a showing of good cause, may move to re-convert the inactive complaint back to an active complaint. Upon the grant of such a motion, Southwestern Bell will be required to file a Response to the Complaint pursuant to section 1.1407 of the Commission's rules,15 within 30 days following the issuance of an order re-converting the Complaint back to active status. 7. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 224 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. 154(i), 154(j), and 224, and sections 1.1401-1418 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 1.1401-1.1418, and the authority delegated