FCC Web Documents citing 1.1208

as compiled by hallikainen.com/FccRules on 2012 07 01

• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1973A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1973A1.pdf
  • phone at (202) 488-5300 or (800) 378-3160, or by facsimile at (202) 488-5563. For further information regarding the public reference file for this waiver request, contact Maria Ringold, Chief, Wireless Branch, RIC, (202) 418-1355. Unless otherwise provided, requests for waiver of the Commission's Rules are subject to treatment by the Commission as restricted proceedings for ex parte purposes under Section 1.1208 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.1208. Because of the policy implications and potential impact of this proceeding on persons not parties to the waiver request, we believe it would be in the public interest to treat this case as a permit-but-disclose proceeding under the ex parte rules. See Sections 1.1200(a), 1.1206 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. ��
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-719A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-719A1.pdf
  • action against a regional wireless carrier, MetroPCS, for refusing to pay North County Communications for use of its network as the FCC's rules require.'' Id. at 1 (emphasis added). Id. Formal complaints are made restricted by 47 C.F.R. �� 1.1202(d)(2) (stating that parties to a formal complaint are parties to a proceeding for purposes of the ex parte rules) and 1.1208 (stating that proceedings not otherwise designated are restricted). Ex parte presentations to and from Commission decision-makers are prohibited in restricted proceedings. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.1208. The resolution of this issue was made in consultation with the Commission's Office of General Counsel, in accordance with 47 C.F.R. � 0.251(g). See Letter from David Senzel, Attorney-Advisor, Office of General Counsel, FCC,
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1465A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1465A1.pdf
  • is threatened...'' 47 C.F.R. � 1.1204(a)(3). Section 1.1200(a) of the Commission's rules also provides, in pertinent part, that ``[w]here the public interest so requires in a particular proceeding, the Commission and its staff retain the discretion to modify the applicable ex parte rules by order, letter or public notice.'' 47 C.F.R. � 1.1204(a)(3). As explained in note 1 to Section 1.1208 of the Commission's rules, if an application is uncontested, the party and the Commission may freely make presentations. Once additional ``parties'' as defined by Section 1.1202(d) are involved in the proceeding, however, then pursuant to Section 1.1208 of the Commission's rules the proceeding is treated as restricted and ex parte presentations are prohibited. 47 C.F.R. � 1.1208. PUBLIC NOTICE Federal
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1731A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1731A1.pdf
  • federal court litigation, in light of the All American Order, or Qwest will move the court to dismiss those claims with prejudice.'' Id. at 2. AT&T Corp. v. Business Telecom, Inc., Order on Reconsideration, 16 FCC Rcd 21750 (2001) (``AT&T v. BTI''). Id., 16 FCC Rcd at 21752-53, �� 6-7. Aventure Petition for Reconsideration at 3. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.1208 (Restricted Proceedings). Qwest Petition to Accept Filing at 1. Id. at 3. Commission rule 1.106(b)(1) addresses petitions for reconsideration filed by persons who are not parties to the proceeding. 47 C.F.R. � 1.106(b). It does not speak to non-parties' attempts to file oppositions to petitions for reconsideration. 47 C.F.R. � 1.223(b). See Teleconnect Co. v. The Bell Company of Pennsylvania,
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-148A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-148A1.pdf
  • the Commission has held that ``to grant non-party requests to reconsider Commission adjudicatory orders based upon the [precedential effect of an adjudicatory order] would open the `floodgates' to non-party participation in adjudicatory proceedings, and thus effectively convert every adjudicatory proceeding into a rulemaking proceeding.'' Id. at 21753, � 7 (citations omitted). Aventure Petition at 5. See 47 C.F.R. �� 1.1202(b), 1.1208. See http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/mdrd/c208.html. We note that Aventure does not claim that it lacked awareness of this proceeding. Indeed, counsel for Aventure and counsel for Northern Valley are partners on the twelve-person ``Telecommunications Team'' in the same law firm. See http://www.arentfox.com/practices/telecom/index.cfm?fa=team. (continued...) Federal Communications Commission FCC 11-148 Federal Communications Commission FCC 11-148 o t  � � � ' � � �
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-%2001-2141A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-%2001-2141A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-%2001-2141A1.txt
  • . It also is available for inspection during normal business hours in the Public Safety and Private Wireless Division, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau, FCC, 445 Twelfth St., S.W., Room 4-C330, Washington, D.C. 20554, (202) 418-0680. Unless otherwise provided, requests for waiver of the Commission's Rules are subject to treatment by the Commission as restricted proceedings for ex parte purposes under Section 1.1208 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.1208. Because of the policy implications and potential impact of this proceeding on persons not parties to the Waiver Request, we believe it would be in the public interest to treat this case as a permit-but-disclose proceeding under the ex parte rules. See Sections 1.1200(a), 1.1206 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. ��
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-1171A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-1171A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-1171A1.txt
  • of the policy implications and potential impact of this proceeding on persons not parties to this petition, we believe it would be in the public interest to treat this matter as a permit-but-disclose proceeding under the ex parte rules, see Sections 1.1200(a) and 1.1206 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.1200(a), 1.1206, rather than a restricted proceeding under Section 1.1208 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.1208. Therefore, any ex parte presentations that are made with respect to the issues involved in the subject petition, subsequent to the release of this Public Notice, will be permissible but must be disclosed in accordance with the requirements of Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.1206(b). . By the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-1172A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-1172A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-1172A1.txt
  • of the policy implications and potential impact of this proceeding on persons not parties to this request, we believe it would be in the public interest to treat this matter as a permit-but-disclose proceeding under the ex parte rules, see Sections 1.1200(a) and 1.1206 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.1200(a), 1.1206, rather than a restricted proceeding under Section 1.1208 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.1208. Therefore, any ex parte presentations that are made with respect to the issues involved in the subject request, subsequent to the release of this Public Notice, will be permissible but must be disclosed in accordance with the requirements of Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.1206(b). For further information,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-1189A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-1189A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-1189A1.txt
  • Bureau (CIB), Federal Communications Commission, 445 Twelfth Street, S.W., Room CY-A257. Copies may also be obtained from ITS. For further information regarding the public reference file for this application contact Maria Ringold, Chief, Wireless Branch, RIC, (202) 418-0271. Unless otherwise provided, applications are subject to treatment by the Commission as restricted proceedings for ex parte purposes under 47 C.F.R. � 1.1208. Because of the policy implications and potential impact of this proceeding on persons not parties to the application, we believe it would be in the public interest to treat this matter as a permit-but-disclose proceeding under the ex parte rules. See 47 C.F.R. �� 1.1200(a), 1.1206. Therefore, subsequent to the release of this Public Notice, ex parte presentations that are
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-1385A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-1385A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-1385A1.txt
  • PROVIDE POINT OF DEPLOYMENT MODULES CSR 5560-Z Pursuant to Section 76.7 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 76.7, MediaOne Group, Inc. (``MediaOne'') filed a petition for special relief requesting a waiver of 47 C.F.R. � 76.1204. MediaOne seeks a waiver from the requirement to offer point of deployment modules (``PODs'') for some of its cable systems. Pursuant to Section 1.1208, of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.1208, this proceeding is designated as restricted for purposes of the Commission's ex parte rules. Comments and oppositions to MediaOne's petition must be filed by July 12, 2000. Replies are due July 24, 2000. All filings should reference the case identifier assigned to this proceeding, CSR 5560-Z. The petition is available for public
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-1386A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-1386A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-1386A1.txt
  • PROVIDE POINT OF DEPLOYMENT MODULES CSR 5561-Z Pursuant to Section 76.7 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 76.7, Cox Communications, Inc. (``Cox'') filed a petition for special relief requesting a waiver of 47 C.F.R. � 76.1204. Cox seeks a waiver from the requirement to offer point of deployment modules (``PODs'') for some of its cable systems. Pursuant to Section 1.1208, of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.1208, this proceeding is designated as restricted for purposes of the Commission's ex parte rules. Comments and oppositions to Cox's petition must be filed by July 12, 2000. Replies are due July 24, 2000. All filings should reference the case identifier assigned to this proceeding, CSR 5561-Z. The petition is available for public
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-1448A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-1448A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-1448A1.txt
  • BALCT-19991028ABE and File No. BALCT-19991028AAZ). Murphy's comments were not served on the petitioner as required by Section 1.420 of the Commission's Rules (see also paragraph 4 of the Appendix to the Notice), and therefore constitute an ex parte violation. Under the circumstances, Murphy's comments would not have been considered in any event in this proceeding. See Sections 1.1200, 1.1202(b) and 1.1208 of the Commission's Rules. These priorities are as follows: (1) to provide at least one television service to all parts of the United States; (2) to provide each community with at least one television broadcast station; (3) to provide a choice of at least two television services to all parts of the United States; (4) to provide each community with
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-1456A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-1456A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-1456A1.txt
  • http://www.fcc.gov DA 00-1456 Report No. SPB-158 June 29, 2000 INTERNATIONAL BUREAU SATELLITE POLICY BRANCH INFORMATION: DIRECTV Enterprises, Inc. Application for Authority to Launch and Operate a Direct Broadcast Satellite Service Space Station File No. SAT-LOA-20000505-00086 The proceeding captioned above is an adjudicative licensing proceeding and is generally restricted under the Commission's ex parte rules. See 47 C.F.R. �� 1.1202(d) and 1.1208. This proceeding is inextricably intertwined with complex, interrelated legal, technical and policy issues associated with the implementation of DBS systems on varying numbers of channels at various orbital locations. The public interest, therefore, requires that the ex parte procedures be modified for this proceeding. The proceeding shall be treated on a non-restricted, permit-but-disclose, basis. 47 C.F.R. �� 1.1200(a), 1.1206 and
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-1477A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-1477A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-1477A1.txt
  • PROVIDE POINT OF DEPLOYMENT MODULES CSR 5566-Z Pursuant to Section 76.7 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 76.7, Cablevision Systems Corp. (``Cablevision'') filed a petition for special relief requesting a waiver of 47 C.F.R. � 76.1204. Cablevision seeks a waiver from the requirement to offer point of deployment modules (``PODs'') for some of its cable systems. Pursuant to Section 1.1208, of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.1208, this proceeding is designated as restricted for purposes of the Commission's ex parte rules. Comments and oppositions to Cablevision's petition must be filed by July 20, 2000. Replies are due July 31, 2000. All filings should reference the case identifier assigned to this proceeding, CSR 5566-Z. The petition is available for public
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-1478A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-1478A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-1478A1.txt
  • POINT OF DEPLOYMENT MODULES CSR 5567-Z Pursuant to Section 76.7 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 76.7, Adelphia Communications Corporation, Inc. (``Adelphia'') filed a petition for special relief requesting a waiver of 47 C.F.R. � 76.1204. Adelphia seeks a waiver from the requirement to offer point of deployment modules (``PODs'') for some of its cable systems. Pursuant to Section 1.1208, of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.1208, this proceeding is designated as restricted for purposes of the Commission's ex parte rules. Comments and oppositions to Adelphia's petition must be filed by July 20, 2000. Replies are due July 31, 2000. All filings should reference the case identifier assigned to this proceeding, CSR 5567-Z. The petition is available for public
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-1479A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-1479A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-1479A1.txt
  • PROVIDE POINT OF DEPLOYMENT MODULES CSR 5564-Z Pursuant to Section 76.7 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 76.7, GCI Cable, Inc. (``GCI'') filed a petition for special relief requesting a waiver of 47 C.F.R. � 76.1204. GCI seeks a waiver from the requirement to offer point of deployment modules (``PODs'') for some of its cable systems. Pursuant to Section 1.1208, of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.1208, this proceeding is designated as restricted for purposes of the Commission's ex parte rules. Comments and oppositions to GCI's petition must be filed by July 20, 2000. Replies are due July 31, 2000. All filings should reference the case identifier assigned to this proceeding, CSR 5564-Z. The petition is available for public
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-1630A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-1630A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-1630A1.txt
  • SPB-159 July 21, 2000 INTERNATIONAL BUREAU SATELLITE POLICY BRANCH INFORMATION: EchoStar Satellite Corporation Application for Authority to Make Minor Modifications to Direct Broadcast Satellite Authorizations, Launch and Operational Authority File No. SAT-MOD-19971230-00231, SAT-MOD-19971230-00235, & DBS-88-01 The proceeding captioned above is an adjudicative licensing proceeding and is generally restricted under the Commission's ex parte rules. See 47 C.F.R. �� 1.1202(d) and 1.1208. This proceeding is inextricably intertwined with complex, interrelated legal, technical and policy issues associated with the implementation of DBS systems serving the States of Hawaii and Alaska. There are varying numbers of channels at various orbital locations involved. The public interest, therefore, requires that the ex parte procedures be modified for this proceeding. The proceeding shall be treated on a
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-1698A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-1698A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-1698A1.txt
  • Room CY-A257, Washington, D.C. 20554. Copies also may be obtained from ITS. For further information concerning the public reference file for this Request for Waiver, contact Maria Ringold, Chief, Wireless Branch, RIC, (202) 418-1350. Unless otherwise provided, requests for waiver of the Commission's Rules are subject to treatment by the Commission as restricted proceedings for ex parte purposes under Section 1.1208 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.1208. Because of the policy implications and potential impact of persons not party to the waiver request, we believe it would be in the public interest to treat this case as a permit-but-disclose proceeding under the ex parte rules. See 47 C.F.R. �� 1.1200(a), 1.1206. Therefore, subsequent to the release of this Public
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-1699A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-1699A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-1699A1.txt
  • Communications Commission, 445 Twelfth Street, S.W., Room CY-A257. Copies may also be obtained from ITS. For further information regarding the public reference file for this application contact Maria Ringold, Chief, Wireless Branch, RIC, (202) 418-1350. Unless otherwise provided, requests for Commission action are subject to treatment by the Commission as restricted proceedings for ex parte purposes under 47 C.F.R. � 1.1208. Because of the policy implications and potential impact of this proceeding on persons not parties to the application, we believe it would be in the public interest to treat this matter as a permit-but-disclose proceeding under the ex parte rules. See 47 C.F.R. �� 1.1200(a), 1.1206. Therefore, subsequent to the release of this Public Notice, ex parte presentations that are
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-1841A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-1841A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-1841A1.txt
  • PDC asserts that its proposed service will be on a secondary, non-interfering basis to direct broadcast satellite services and on a co-primary basis with any fixed satellite services, such as that proposed by Skybridge. Requests for waiver of the Commission's Rules are subject, unless otherwise provided, to treatment by the Commission as restricted proceedings for ex parte purposes under Section 1.1208 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.1208. Because of the policy implications and the potential impact of this proceeding on other proceedings, as well as, persons not parties to the waiver requests, we believe it would be in the public interest to treat this case as a permit-but-disclose proceeding under the ex parte rules. Therefore, any ex parte presentations
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-192A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-192A1.txt
  • D.C., 20554, (202) 418-0270 and from ITS Duplicating Services, 1231 20th St., N.W., Washington D.C. 20036, (202) 857-3800. For further information, contact Kathleen Campbell at (202) 418-0753 or Michael McCoin at (202) 418-0774. Ex Parte Status of Proceeding. The proceeding captioned above is an adjudicative proceeding and is generally restricted under Commission ex parte rules. [47 C.F.R. �� 1.1202(d) and 1.1208.] INTELSAT L.L.C. requests that the proceeding be declared "non-restrictive" "permit-but-disclose" for purposes of our ex parte rules. [INTELSAT L.L.C. Application at Vol. 1, 69-71. See also, generally, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.1200 et seq.] INTELSAT L.L.C. states that declaring this proceeding permit-but-disclose would "best ensure that the public interest is served." INTELSAT L.L.C. asserts that this is because of the "unusual
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2134A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2134A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2134A1.txt
  • satellite) and other fixed microwave systems. SRL asserts that its proposed service will be on a secondary, non-interfering basis to DBS and on a co-primary basis with any other DBS spectrum sharing proposals submitted. Requests for waiver of the Commission's Rules are subject, unless otherwise provided, to treatment by the Commission as restricted proceedings for ex parte purposes under Section 1.1208 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.1208. Because of the policy implications and the potential impact of this proceeding on other proceedings, as well as, persons not parties to the waiver requests, we believe it would be in the public interest to treat this case as a permit-but-disclose proceeding under the ex parte rules. Therefore, any ex parte presentations
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2167A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2167A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2167A1.txt
  • 445 Twelfth Street, S.W., Room CY-A257. Copies may also be obtained from ITS. For further information regarding the public reference file for these waiver requests contact Maria Ringold, Chief, Wireless Branch, RIC, (202) 418-1350. Unless otherwise provided, requests for waiver of the Commission's Rules are subject to treatment by the Commission as restricted proceedings for ex parte purposes under Section 1.1208 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.1208. Because of the policy implications and potential impact of this proceeding on persons not parties to the waiver requests, we believe it would be in the public interest to treat this case as a permit-but-disclose proceeding under the ex parte rules. See Sections 1.1200(a), 1.1206 of the Commission's Rules. 47 C.F.R.�� 1.1200(a),
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2236A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2236A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2236A1.txt
  • ex parte status of the applications in the first Ka-band satellite application processing round. We also clarify that we will continue to treat the pending applications in the second Ka-band processing round as a permit-but-disclose proceeding. Under the Commission's ex parte rules, the applications in the first Ka-band processing round were treated as a restricted application proceeding. See ��1.200(d) and 1.1208. These applicants received licenses in May 1997. The International Bureau established a cut-off for applications for the second Ka-band processing round and received several applications in December of 1997. When these applications were accepted for filing, the Commission redesignated the ex parte status for applications in the second-processing round from restricted to permit-but-disclose. See Public Notice Report No. SAT-00012(1999), released
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2249A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2249A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2249A1.txt
  • IN THE MATTER OF MARITIME TELECOMMUNICATIONS NETWORK, INC., APPLICATION FOR SPECIAL TEMPORARY AUTHORITY, REQUEST FOR SPECIAL TEMPORARY AUTHORITY TO OPERATE EARTH STATIONS COMMUNICATING WITH SATELLITES OF NEW SKIES SATELLITE, N.V., APPLICATIONS FOR FIXED EARTH STATION LICENSES The proceeding captioned above is an adjudicative proceeding and is generally restricted under the Commission's ex parte rules. See 47 C.F.R. �� 1.1202(d) and 1.1208. Maritime Telecommunications Network, Inc. (MTN) seeks modification of the ex parte procedures in this proceeding to discuss issues that could be raised by its contemplated petition to stay the International Bureau's Order of September 29, 2000. See Maritime Telecommunications Network, Inc., Order, DA 00-1300 (released Sept. 29, 2000) (Order). The Order addressed several complex legal and jurisdictional issues. In addition,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-230A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-230A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-230A1.txt
  • Street, S.W., Room CY-A257, Washington, D.C. 20554. Copies also may be obtained from ITS. For further information regarding the public reference file for this Request, contact Maria Ringold, Chief, Wireless Branch, RIC, (202) 418-1350. Unless otherwise provided, requests for waiver of the Commission's Rules are subject to treatment by the Commission as restricted proceedings for ex parte purposes under Section 1.1208 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.1208. Because of the policy implications and potential impact of this proceeding on land mobile and public safety licensees not parties to the waiver request, we believe it would be in the public interest to treat this case as a permit-but-disclose proceeding under the ex parte rules. See 47 C.F.R. �� 1.1200(a), 1.1206.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2328A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2328A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2328A1.txt
  • Order concerning an investigation into the disclosure of certain confidential information by the Walt Disney Company (``Disney''). We have determined that the issues associated with the disclosure of confidential information referred to in the October 10 Order should be treated as a restricted matter under the Commission's ex parte rules, effective upon release of this Order. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.1208. For purposes of service and other requirements under those ex parte rules, the parties shall be deemed to be Time Warner, Inc., America Online, Inc., and Disney. For all other purposes, this application proceeding shall continue to be treated as a permit-but-disclose proceeding governed by section 1.1206 of the ex parte rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.1206. This Order is issued
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2584A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2584A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2584A1.txt
  • 445 Twelfth Street, S.W., Room CY-A257. Copies may also be obtained from ITS. For further information regarding the public reference file for this Waiver Request contact Maria Ringold, Chief, Wireless Branch, RIC, (202) 418-1350. Unless otherwise provided, requests for waiver of the Commission's Rules are subject to treatment by the Commission as restricted proceedings for ex parte purposes under Section 1.1208 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.1208. Because of the policy implications and potential impact of this proceeding on persons not parties to the waiver request, we believe it would be in the public interest to treat this case as a permit-but-disclose proceeding under the ex parte rules. See Sections 1.1200(a), 1.1206 of the Commission's Rules. 47 C.F.R. ��
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2614A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2614A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2614A1.txt
  • its transferee, in whole or in part, to adjust a winning bid in any spectrum auction prior to June 8, 2003, subject to terms and conditions set forth in the Commission's Order. Ex Parte Rule: Applicants should also be aware that the Commission has generally exempted auction proceedings from the strict requirements of the ex parte rule found in Section 1.1208 of the Commission's rules. Mock Auction: All applicants found to be qualified bidders are eligible to participate in a mock electronic auction on Friday, December 8, 2000. In the Qualified Bidders Public Notice, the Bureau will announce when software for the mock auction will be posted on the World Wide Web. Remote Bidding Software: Applicants are reminded that qualified bidders
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2670A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2670A1.txt
  • to deny may be filed on or before December 27, 2000. Reply comments or oppositions to petitions to deny may be filed on or before January 8, 2001. Responses may be filed on or before January 15, 2001. This proceeding is an adjudicative licensing proceeding and is generally restricted under the Commission's ex parte rules. See 47 C.F.R. �� 1.1202(d), 1.1208. For further information, contact Kathleen Campbell at (202) 418-0753, or Steven Spaeth (202) 418-1539. Page 2 of 2
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-320A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-320A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-320A1.txt
  • of the policy implications and potential impact of this proceeding on persons not parties to this request, we believe it would be in the public interest to treat this case as a permit-but-disclose proceeding under the ex parte rules, see Sections 1.1200(a) and 1.1206 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.1200(a), 1.1206, rather than a restricted proceeding under Section 1.1208 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.1208. Therefore, any ex parte presentations that are made with respect to the issues involved in the subject request, subsequent to the release of this Public Notice, will be permissible but must be disclosed in accordance with the requirements of Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.1206(b). . By the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-402A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-402A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-402A1.txt
  • 445 Twelfth Street, S.W., Room CY-A257. Copies may also be obtained from ITS. For further information regarding the public reference file for this Waiver Request contact Maria Ringold, Chief, Wireless Branch, RIC, (202) 418-1350. Unless otherwise provided, requests for waiver of the Commission's Rules are subject to treatment by the Commission as restricted proceedings for ex parte purposes under Section 1.1208 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.1208. Because of the policy implications and potential impact of this proceeding on persons not parties to the waiver request, we believe it would be in the public interest to treat this case as a permit-but-disclose proceeding under the ex parte rules. See Sections 1.1200(a), 1.1206 of the Commission's Rules. 47 C.F.R.�� 1.1200(a),
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-405A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-405A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-405A1.txt
  • involved in all bidding consortia, joint ventures, partnerships, and other arrangements entered into relating to the competitive bidding process. Bidders found to have violated the anti-collusion rule may be subject to sanctions. Ex Parte Rule: Applicants should also be aware that the Commission has generally exempted auction proceedings from the strict requirements of the ex parte rule (47 C.F.R. � 1.1208). Mock Auction: All applicants found to be qualified bidders are eligible to participate in a mock electronic auction on Friday, March 17, 2000. The Bureau will issue a public notice announcing when software for the mock auction will be posted on the World Wide Web. Remote Bidding Software: Applicants are reminded that qualified bidders are eligible to bid either electronically
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-452A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-452A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-452A1.txt
  • market. Petitioners request that the Bureau require Motorola to provide facts to support its request for assignment of unconstructed authorizations, provide Petitioners and other parties an opportunity to review these facts, and then assess Motorola's request in light of the facts and relevant law. DISCUSSION We disagree with Petitioners' claim that Bureau staff violated the agency's ex parte rules. Section 1.1208 of our rules prohibits ex parte presentations, to or from Commission staff, in restricted proceedings, unless the presentation is exempt under Section 1.1204(b). Pursuant to Section 1.1204(b)(7), in force at the time the application was filed, ex parte communications by the Commission or staff requesting information to clarify or adduce evidence or to resolve issues were exempt from the ex
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-474A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-474A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-474A1.txt
  • short-form applications until after the high bidder makes the required down payment. 47 C.F.R. � 1.2105(c)(1). Counsel for High Plains contacted the Commission's staff on November 25, 1996, and High Plains filed its Emergency Motion on November 26, 1996. High Plains Opposition to Petition to Deny at 3-4 (filed April 8, 1997). Specifically, Mercury alleges that High Plains violated section 1.1208(b)(2) of the Commission's rules, which provides as follows: (b) No person shall make an ex parte presentation in a proceeding that could become restricted even though the proceeding is not restricted at the time if: . . . . (2) That person intends to file an opposition, complaint, or objection which would cause the proceeding to become restricted. 47 C.F.R.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-83A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-83A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-83A1.txt
  • W., Room CY-A257, Washington, D. C. 20554. Copies also may be obtained from ITS. For further information regarding the public reference file for this Request, contact Maria Ringold, Chief, Wireless Branch, RIC, (202) 418-1350. Unless otherwise provided, requests for waiver of the Commission's Rules are subject to treatment by the Commission as restricted proceedings for ex parte purposes under Section 1.1208 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.1208. Because of the policy implications and potential impact of this proceeding on land mobile licensees not parties to the waiver request, we believe it would be in the public interest to treat this case as a permit-but-disclose proceeding under the ex parte rules. See 47 C.F.R. �� 1.1200(a), 1.1206. Therefore, subsequent to
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-888A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-888A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-888A1.txt
  • 445 Twelfth Street, S.W., Room CY-A257. Copies may also be obtained from ITS. For further information regarding the public reference file for this Waiver Request contact Maria Ringold, Chief, Wireless Branch, RIC, (202) 418-0271. Unless otherwise provided, requests for waiver of the Commission's Rules are subject to treatment by the Commission as restricted proceedings for ex parte purposes under Section 1.1208 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.1208. Because of the policy implications and potential impact of this proceeding on persons not parties to the waiver request, we believe it would be in the public interest to treat this case as a permit-but-disclose proceeding under the ex parte rules. See Sections 1.1200(a), 1.1206 of the Commission's Rules. 47 C.F.R.�� 1.1200(a),
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-109A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-109A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-109A1.txt
  • on two provisions of the Commission's ex parte rules. The first, 47 C.F.R. � 1.1202(d)(1), defines as parties for ex parte purposes: In a proceeding not designated for hearing, any person who files an application . . . and . . . in the case of an application, any person filing a mutually exclusive application; The second, 47 C.F.R. � 1.1208, provides that unless otherwise provided by the Commission or its staff, or listed as exempt or permit-but-disclose in other sections of the ex parte rules, proceedings are restricted. Thus, according to Pegasus, the existence of mutual exclusivity between its application and Broadwave's establishes a restricted proceeding involving their applications. In Pegasus' view, this remains the case despite WTB's action designating
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1177A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1177A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1177A1.txt
  • Auction Discount Voucher to adjust the transferee's winning bids in Auction No. 35, the Auction Discount Voucher could be used to adjust winning bids in another FCC auction, including Auction No. 39. Ex Parte Rule: Applicants should also be aware that the Commission has generally exempted auction proceedings from the strict requirements of the ex parte rule found in Section 1.1208 of the Commission's rules. Mock Auction: All applicants found to be qualified bidders are eligible to participate in a mock electronic auction on Monday, June 4, 2001. In the Qualified Bidders Public Notice, the Bureau will announce when software for the mock auction will be posted on the World Wide Web. Remote Bidding Software: Applicants are reminded that qualified bidders
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1191A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1191A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1191A1.txt
  • Policy and Rules Branch, 445 Twelfth Street, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20554; and 3) Maria Ringold, Federal Communications Commission, Consumer Information Branch, Reference Information Center, 445 Twelfth Street, S.W., Room CY-B529, Washington, D.C. 20554. . Unless otherwise provided, requests for waiver of the Commission's Rules are subject to treatment by the Commission as restricted proceedings for ex parte purposes under Section 1.1208 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.1208. Because of the policy implications and potential impact of this proceeding on persons not parties to the waiver request, we believe it would be in the public interest to treat this case as a permit-but-disclose proceeding under the ex parte rules. See Sections 1.1200(a), 1.1206 of the Commission's Rules. 47 C.F.R. ��
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-138A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-138A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-138A1.txt
  • its transferee, in whole or in part, to adjust a winning bid in any spectrum auction prior to June 8, 2003, subject to terms and conditions set forth in the Commission's Order. Ex Parte Rule: Applicants should also be aware that the Commission has generally exempted auction proceedings from the strict requirements of the ex parte rule found in Section 1.1208 of the Commission's rules. Mock Auction: All applicants found to be qualified bidders are eligible to participate in a mock auction on Friday, February 9, 2001. In the Qualified Bidders Public Notice, the Bureau will announce when software for the mock auction will be posted on the World Wide Web. Telephonic bidding will also be available during the mock auction.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1414A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1414A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1414A1.txt
  • International Transcription service, Inc., 1231 20th Street, NW, Washington, D.C. 20037. We will treat this proceeding as a permit-but-disclose proceeding for purposes of the Commission's ex parte rules. See generally, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.1200-1.1206. However, if this waiver petition is opposed, it will be treated as a restricted proceeding under the Commission's ex parte rules. See generally, 47 C.F.R. � 1.1208. For further information contact Antoinette Stevens at (202) 418-7400, TTY (202) 418-0484. PUBLIC NOTICE DA 01-1414 Federal Communications Commission 445 12th St.., S.W. Washington, D.C. 20554 News Media Information 202 / 418-0500 Fax-On-Demand 202 / 418-2830 TTY 202 / 418-2555 ftp.fcc.gov � � (c) F� (c) �� ����PNG RR�~R�n� |�o� |�o� X*�N�*K � ~j0tm@"Iu�� �2~��y=��b��"���05 X� ?''z[�'';: ''@�/'", �Z!� g$!���H
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1422A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1422A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1422A1.txt
  • 445 Twelfth Street, S.W., Room CY-A257. Copies may also be obtained from ITS. For further information regarding the public reference file for this Waiver Request contact Maria Ringold, Chief, Wireless Branch, RIC, (202) 418-1355. Unless otherwise provided, requests for waiver of the Commission's Rules are subject to treatment by the Commission as restricted proceedings for ex parte purposes under Section 1.1208 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.1208. Because of the policy implications and potential impact of this proceeding on persons not parties to the waiver request, we believe it would be in the public interest to treat this case as a permit-but-disclose proceeding under the ex parte rules. See Sections 1.1200(a), 1.1206 of the Commission's Rules. 47 C.F.R. ��
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-151A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-151A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-151A1.txt
  • of the policy implications and potential impact of this proceeding on persons not parties to this request, we believe it would be in the public interest to treat this matter as a permit-but-disclose proceeding under the ex parte rules, see Sections 1.1200(a) and 1.1206 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.1200(a), 1.1206, rather than a restricted proceeding under Section 1.1208 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.1208. Therefore, any ex parte presentations that are made with respect to the issues involved in the subject request, subsequent to the release of this Public Notice, will be permissible but must be disclosed in accordance with the requirements of Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.1206(b). For further information,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-152A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-152A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-152A1.txt
  • of the policy implications and potential impact of this proceeding on persons not parties to this request, we believe it would be in the public interest to treat this matter as a permit-but-disclose proceeding under the ex parte rules, see Sections 1.1200(a) and 1.1206 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.1200(a), 1.1206, rather than a restricted proceeding under Section 1.1208 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.1208. Therefore, any ex parte presentations that are made with respect to the issues involved in the subject request, subsequent to the release of this Public Notice, will be permissible but must be disclosed in accordance with the requirements of Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.1206(b). . By the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1583A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1583A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1583A1.txt
  • International Transcription service, Inc., 1231 20th Street, NW, Washington, D.C. 20037. We will treat this proceeding as a permit-but-disclose proceeding for purposes of the Commission's ex parte rules. See generally, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.1200-1.1206. However, if this waiver petition is opposed, it will be treated as a restricted proceeding under the Commission's ex parte rules. See generally, 47 C.F.R. � 1.1208. For further information contact Antoinette Stevens at (202) 418-7400, TTY (202) 418-0484. PUBLIC NOTICE DA 01-1583 Federal Communications Commission 445 12th St.., S.W. Washington, D.C. 20554 News Media Information 202 / 418-0500 Fax-On-Demand 202 / 418-2830 TTY 202 / 418-2555 ftp.fcc.gov �� ����PNG RR�~R�n� |�o� |�o� X*�N�*K � ~j0tm@"Iu�� �2~��y=��b��"���05 X� ?''z[�'';: ''@�/'", �Z!� g$!���H (c)� � .[�'' �� �]�'
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1659A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1659A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1659A1.txt
  • 445 Twelfth Street, SW, Room CY-A257. Copies may also be obtained from ITS. For further information regarding the public reference file for these waiver requests contact Maria Ringold, Chief, Wireless Branch, RIC, (202) 418-1355. Unless otherwise provided, requests for waiver of the Commission's Rules are subject to treatment by the Commission as restricted proceedings for ex parte purposes under Section 1.1208 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.1208. Because of the policy implications and potential impact of this proceeding on persons not parties to the waiver request, we believe it would be in the public interest to treat this case as a permit-but-disclose proceeding under the ex parte rules. See Sections 1.1200(a), 1.1206 of the Commission's Rules. 47 C.F.R. ��
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1937A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1937A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1937A1.txt
  • for e-mail comments, commenters should send an e-mail to ecfs@fcc.gov, and should include the following words in the body of the message, "get form ." A sample form and directions will be sent in reply. This proceeding is ``restricted'' for purposes of the Commission's ex parte rules. Presentations will be governed by the procedures set forth in section 1.1208 of the Commission's rules applicable to restricted proceedings. Interested parties shall file an original and one copy of any written presentation with the Commission's Secretary, Magalie Roman Salas, 445 12th Street, S.W., TW-B204, Washington, D.C. 20554. Parties shall also serve one copy of each such filing on (1) all other parties to this proceeding, (2) for any such filing submitted
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2052A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2052A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2052A1.txt
  • to adjust one of its winning bids in Auction No. 35. The remaining portion of Qualcomm's ADV could be used to adjust winning bids in another FCC auction, including Auction No. 41. Ex Parte Rule: Applicants should also be aware that the Commission has generally exempted auction proceedings from the strict requirements of the ex parte rule found in Section 1.1208 of the Commission's rules. Mock Auction: All applicants found to be qualified bidders are eligible to participate in a mock auction on Friday, September 28, 2001. Internet bidding is a new concept in our auctions program, and we encourage all qualified bidders to take advantage of this mock auction. In the Qualified Bidders Public Notice, the Bureau will announce the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2262A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2262A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2262A1.txt
  • to adjust one of its winning bids in Auction No. 35. The remaining portion of Qualcomm's ADV could be used to adjust winning bids in another FCC auction, including Auction No. 40. Ex Parte Rule: Applicants should also be aware that the Commission has generally exempted auction proceedings from the strict requirements of the ex parte rule found in Section 1.1208 of the Commission's rules. Mock Auction: All applicants found to be qualified bidders will be eligible to participate in a mock auction on Thursday, October 25, 2001. Internet bidding is a new concept in our auctions program, and we encourage all qualified bidders to take advantage of this mock auction. In the Qualified Bidders Public Notice, the Bureau will announce
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2349A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2349A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2349A1.txt
  • to adjust one of its winning bids in Auction No. 35. The remaining portion of Qualcomm's ADV could be used to adjust winning bids in another FCC auction, including Auction No. 42. Ex Parte Rule: Applicants should also be aware that the Commission has generally exempted auction proceedings from the strict requirements of the ex parte rule found in Section 1.1208 of the Commission's rules. Mock Auction: All applicants found to be qualified bidders will be eligible to participate in a mock auction on Friday, November 9, 2001. Internet bidding is a new concept in our auctions program, and we encourage all qualified bidders to take advantage of this mock auction. In the Qualified Bidders Public Notice, the Bureau will announce
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2388A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2388A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2388A1.txt
  • from Vincent D. McBride and Scott D. Reiter to Michael K. Powell, Chairman, Federal Communications Commission (``FCC'') (Aug. 25, 2001); letter from Scott D. Reiter and Vincent D. McBride to Michael K. Powell, Chairman, FCC (July 16, 2001); letter from Vincent D. McBride and Scott D. Reiter to Michael K. Powell, Chairman, FCC (July 9, 2001). See 47 C.F.R. � 1.1208 Note 1 and Example. �$ �����PNG > �!�R>^��S�S߿�"K�k������er4 �J�dM�O�O � �,I TV��5 0�z̪�� ��� %�o� �� � �a�% Tf(c) U~��Uy�Ӛ�o=�c� {�YAD ���Zv�}�YAD e/�,�-�%E9 ^1�J 2�� bʆPh=f 8H�]}��`��2@ ���'����X�t�p�O � ��$��>��� -�m�``�Q(q P� ���e D �_�� p�/]b|?�O� V��Jõ tXT���e� 2)�V``� (c)}�l�tmE...bϡ gs�>o���(R)"q�Q ܆���D N ��- >��r�Kp��-~i�f�M�� z} ���� tm��(c)��cv `��� 0i 0i 0i 0i 0i 0i 0i 0i 0i 0i 0i
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2546A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2546A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2546A1.txt
  • of the benchmark settlement rate for a period of five years or until Guyana's teledensity reaches 23 telephones, whichever occurs first. The Commission issued a Public Notice on July 17, 2001, setting dates for public comment on the waiver request. That Public Notice did not address the ex parte treatment for this proceeding. As a waiver proceeding, pursuant to section 1.1208 of the Commission's rules, this proceeding is thus treated as a restricted proceeding for purposes of the Commission's ex parte rules. Pursuant to section 1.1200(a) of the Commission's rules, we find that the issues before us in this proceeding have applicability beyond the parties immediately involved in this proceeding. Accordingly, we find that it would serve the public interest to
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2635A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2635A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2635A1.txt
  • Qualex International, Portals II, 445 Twelfth Street, SW, Room CY-B402, Washington, D.C. 20554. For further information regarding the public reference file for this Waiver Request contact Maria Ringold, Chief, Wireless Branch, RIC, (202) 418-1355. Unless otherwise provided, requests for waiver of the Commission's Rules are subject to treatment by the Commission as restricted proceedings for ex parte purposes under Section 1.1208 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.1208. Because of the policy implications and potential impact of this proceeding on persons not parties to the waiver request, we believe it would be in the public interest to treat this case as a permit-but-disclose proceeding under the ex parte rules. See Sections 1.1200(a), 1.1206 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. ��
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-264A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-264A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-264A1.txt
  • 445 Twelfth Street, S.W., Room CY-A257. Copies may also be obtained from ITS. For further information regarding the public reference file for this Waiver Request contact Maria Ringold, Chief, Wireless Branch, RIC, (202) 418-0070. Unless otherwise provided, requests for waiver of the Commission's Rules are subject to treatment by the Commission as restricted proceedings for ex parte purposes under Section 1.1208 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.1208. Because of the policy implications and potential impact of this proceeding on persons not parties to the waiver request, we believe it would be in the public interest to treat this case as a permit-but-disclose proceeding under the ex parte rules. See Sections 1.1200(a), 1.1206 of the Commission's Rules. 47 C.F.R. ��
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2660A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2660A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2660A1.txt
  • for this Waiver Request, contact Maria Ringold, Chief, Wireless Branch, RIC, (202) 418-1355. Please note that the Verizon waiver request and NCS statement can be found on the internet at the following URL addresses: Unless otherwise provided, requests for waiver of the Commission's Rules are subject to treatment by the Commission as restricted proceedings for ex parte purposes under Section 1.1208 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.1208. Therefore, ex parte presentations to or from Commission decision-making personnel are prohibited until this proceeding is no longer subject to administrative reconsideration or review or judicial review. For further information, contact Karen Franklin, Esq. of the Policy and Rules Branch of the Public Safety and Private Wireless Division of the Wireless Telecommunications
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2662A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2662A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2662A1.txt
  • Room CY-B402, Washington, DC, 20554, telephone 202-863-2893, facsimile 202-863-2898, or via e-mail qualexint@aol.com. For further information regarding the public reference file for these waiver requests contact Maria Ringold, Chief, Wireless Branch, RIC, (202) 418-1355. Unless otherwise provided, requests for waiver of the Commission's Rules are subject to treatment by the Commission as restricted proceedings for ex parte purposes under Section 1.1208 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.1208. Because of the policy implications and potential impact of this proceeding on persons not parties to the waiver request, we believe it would be in the public interest to treat this case as a permit-but-disclose proceeding under the ex parte rules. See Sections 1.1200(a), 1.1206 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. ��
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2689A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2689A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2689A1.txt
  • No. 25106) announcing that the applications had been accepted for filing and establishing a pleading cycle to permit interested parties an opportunity to comment on the proposed transaction. Applications for consent to the transfer of control of broadcast licenses and authorizations are subject, unless otherwise provided, to treatment by the Commission as restricted proceedings for ex parte purposes under Section 1.1208 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �1.1208. However, in order to permit a full exchange on the multiple issues under consideration by the Commission, we have concluded that the public interest would be served by classifying this proceeding as permit-but-disclose under the ex parte rules. Accordingly, by this Public Notice, and pursuant to Section 1.1200(a) of the Commission's rules, 47
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2762A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2762A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2762A1.txt
  • to adjust one of its winning bids in Auction No. 35. The remaining portion of Qualcomm's ADV could be used to adjust winning bids in another FCC auction, including Auction No. 43. Ex Parte Rule: Applicants should also be aware that the Commission has generally exempted auction proceedings from the strict requirements of the ex parte rule found in Section 1.1208 of the Commission's rules. Mock Auction: All applicants found to be qualified bidders will be eligible to participate in a mock auction on Monday, January 7, 2002. Internet bidding is a new concept in our auctions program, and we encourage all qualified bidders to take advantage of this mock auction. In the Qualified Bidders Public Notice, the Bureau will announce
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2883A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2883A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2883A1.txt
  • for this Waiver Request, contact Maria Ringold, Chief, Wireless Branch, RIC, (202) 418-1355. Please note that the VoiceStream waiver request and NCS statement can be found on the internet at the following URL addresses: Unless otherwise provided, requests for waiver of the Commission's Rules are subject to treatment by the Commission as restricted proceedings for ex parte purposes under Section 1.1208 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.1208. Therefore, ex parte presentations to or from Commission decision-making personnel are prohibited until this proceeding is no longer subject to administrative reconsideration or review or judicial review. For further information, contact Karen Franklin, Esq. of the Policy and Rules Branch of the Public Safety and Private Wireless Division of the Wireless Telecommunications
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-3020A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-3020A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-3020A1.txt
  • Room CY-B402, Washington, DC, 20554, telephone 202-863-2893, facsimile 202-863-2898, or via e-mail qualexint@aol.com. For further information regarding the public reference file for these waiver requests contact Maria Ringold, Chief, Wireless Branch, RIC, (202) 418-1355. Unless otherwise provided, requests for waiver of the Commission's Rules are subject to treatment by the Commission as restricted proceedings for ex parte purposes under Section 1.1208 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.1208. Because of the policy implications and potential impact of this proceeding on persons not parties to the waiver request, we believe it would be in the public interest to treat this case as a permit-but-disclose proceeding under the ex parte rules. See Sections 1.1200(a), 1.1206 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. ��
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-3023A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-3023A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-3023A1.txt
  • v. ACS Holdings must file a detailed summary in the record of this proceeding and in the record of GCI v. ACS Holdings and serve a copy on the parties to that proceeding (namely GCI and ACS). This procedure must be followed because GCI v. ACS Holdings is a restricted proceeding in which ex parte presentations are prohibited under section 1.1208 of the Commission's rules. ORDERING CLAUSES ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to sections 204(a) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. � 204(a), and pursuant to the authority delegated by sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91 and 0.291, the tariffs of the carriers identified in Appendix A, ARE SUSPENDED for
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-38A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-38A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-38A1.txt
  • the policy implications and potential impact of this proceeding on persons not parties to this request, we believe it would be in the public interest to treat this matter as a permit-but-disclose proceeding under the ex parte rules, see Sections 1.1200(a) and 1.1206 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.1200(a), 1.1206, rather than as a restricted proceeding under Section 1.1208 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.1208. Therefore, any ex parte presentations that are made with respect to the issues involved in the subject request, subsequent to the release of this Public Notice, will be permissible but must be disclosed in accordance with the requirements of Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.1206(b). . By the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-598A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-598A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-598A1.txt
  • 445 Twelfth Street, S.W., Room CY-A257. Copies may also be obtained from ITS. For further information regarding the public reference file for this Waiver Request contact Maria Ringold, Chief, Wireless Branch, RIC, (202) 418-1355. Unless otherwise provided, requests for waiver of the Commission's Rules are subject to treatment by the Commission as restricted proceedings for ex parte purposes under Section 1.1208 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.1208. Because of the policy implications and potential impact of this proceeding on persons not parties to the waiver request, we believe it would be in the public interest to treat this case as a permit-but-disclose proceeding under the ex parte rules. See Sections 1.1200(a), 1.1206 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. ��
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-698A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-698A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-698A1.txt
  • Federal Communications Commission, 445 Twelfth Street, S.W., Room CY-A257. Copies may also be obtained from ITS. For further information regarding the public reference file for these waiver requests contact Maria Ringold, Chief, Wireless Branch, RIC, (202) 418-1355. Unless otherwise provided, requests for Commission action are subject to treatment by the Commission as restricted proceedings for ex parte purposes under Section 1.1208 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.1208. Because of the policy implications and potential impact of this proceeding on persons not parties to Maritel's request, we believe it would be in the public interest to treat this case as a permit-but-disclose proceeding under the ex parte rules. See Sections 1.1200(a), 1.1206 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.1200(a),
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-910A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-910A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-910A1.txt
  • 445 Twelfth Street, S.W., Room CY-A257. Copies may also be obtained from ITS. For further information regarding the public reference file for this Waiver Request contact Maria Ringold, Chief, Wireless Branch, RIC, (202) 418-1355. Unless otherwise provided, requests for waiver of the Commission's Rules are subject to treatment by the Commission as restricted proceedings for ex parte purposes under Section 1.1208 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.1208. Because of the policy implications and potential impact of this proceeding on persons not parties to the waiver request, we believe it would be in the public interest to treat this case as a permit-but-disclose proceeding under the ex parte rules. See Sections 1.1200(a), 1.1206 of the Commission's Rules. 47 C.F.R. ��
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-118A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-118A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-118A1.txt
  • Opposition of EchoStar Satellite Corporation and Motion to Strike, File Nos. SAT-MOD-20010810-00071 & SAT-A/O-20010810-00073 (October 4, 2001) (EchoStar Opposition). EchoStar's Opposition claims that NAB violated the Commission's ex parte rules for restricted proceedings by not serving its comments on EchoStar; rather, EchoStar obtained a copy of NAB's comments from members of the press. Id. at 9 (citing 47 C.F.R. � 1.1208). We do not find that the failure to serve these comments has tainted the application proceeding, and it does not appear that EchoStar's ability to fully and fairly present arguments regarding the issues in NAB's comments was unduly prejudiced by the lack of service. See, e.g., Beehive Telephone, Inc., et al. v. The Bell Operating Companies, Memorandum Opinion and Order,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1213A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1213A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1213A1.txt
  • to adjust one of its winning bids in Auction No. 35. The remaining portion of Qualcomm's ADV could be used to adjust winning bids in another FCC auction, including Auction No. 44. Ex Parte Rule: Applicants should also be aware that the Commission has generally exempted auction proceedings from the strict requirements of the ex parte rule found in Section 1.1208 of the Commission's rules. Mock Auction: All applicants found to be qualified bidders will be eligible to participate in a mock auction on Friday, June 14, 2002. We encourage all qualified bidders to take advantage of this mock auction to become familiar with the FCC Automated Auction System. In the Qualified Bidders Public Notice, the Bureau will announce the bidding
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1214A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1214A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1214A1.txt
  • Bureau, Reference Information Center, 445 12th Street, S.W. Room CY-B529, Washington, D.C. 20554. . For further information regarding the public reference file for this Request, contact Maria Ringold, Chief, Wireless Branch, RIC, (202) 418-1355. Unless otherwise provided, requests for waiver of the Commission's Rules are subject to treatment by the Commission as restricted proceedings for ex parte purposes under Section 1.1208 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.1208. Because of the policy implications and potential impact of this proceeding on persons not parties to the waiver request, we believe it would be in the public interest to treat this case as a permit-but-disclose proceeding under the ex parte rules, See 47 C.F.R. �� 1.1200(a), 1.1206. Therefore, subsequent to the release
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1296A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1296A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1296A1.txt
  • General Correspondence, Public Notice, 16 FCC Rcd 22165 (rel. Dec. 14, 2001). . For further information regarding the public reference file for this Waiver Request, contact Maria Ringold, Chief, Wireless Branch, RIC, (202) 418-1355. Unless otherwise provided, requests for waiver of the Commission's Rules are subject to treatment by the Commission as restricted proceedings for ex parte purposes under Section 1.1208 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.1208. Because of the policy implications and potential impact of this proceeding on persons not parties to the waiver request, we believe it would be in the public interest to treat this case as a permit-but-disclose proceeding under the ex parte rules. See Sections 1.1200(a), 1.1206 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. ��
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-173A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-173A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-173A1.txt
  • Room CY-B402, Washington, DC, 20554, telephone 202-863-2893, facsimile 202-863-2898, or via e-mail qualexint@aol.com. For further information regarding the public reference file for these waiver requests contact Maria Ringold, Chief, Wireless Branch, RIC, (202) 418-1355. Unless otherwise provided, requests for waiver of the Commission's Rules are subject to treatment by the Commission as restricted proceedings for ex parte purposes under Section 1.1208 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.1208. Because of the policy implications and potential impact of this proceeding on persons not parties to the waiver request, we believe it would be in the public interest to treat this case as a permit-but-disclose proceeding under the ex parte rules. See Sections 1.1200(a), 1.1206 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. ��
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1827A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1827A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1827A1.txt
  • 47 C.F.R. Part 90 -- Private Land Mobile Radio Services, Report and Order and Further Notice of Proposed Rule Making, WT Docket No. 98-182, 15 FCC Rcd 16,673 (2000). Request for Declaratory Ruling at 5-7. Request for Declaratory Ruling at 7-8. Request for Declaratory Ruling at 8. Request for Declaratory Ruling at 8-9. 47 C.F.R. � 1.1206(a)(3). Pursuant to Section 1.1208, applications for authority under Title III of the Communications Act are treated as restricted proceedings. 47 C.F.R. � 1.1208. See 47 C.F.R. �� 1.1200(a), 1.1208, n.2. 47 C.F.R. � 1.1206. We note that i2way currently has a number of applications pending for CMRS authorizations, not all of which are among the twenty-six file numbers listed in the caption of i2way's
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2064A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2064A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2064A1.txt
  • Fax Number for General Correspondence, Public Notice, 16 FCC Rcd 22165 (2001). . For further information regarding the public reference file for this Waiver Request, contact Maria Ringold, Chief, Wireless Branch, RIC, (202) 418-1355. Unless otherwise provided, requests for waiver of the Commission's Rules are subject to treatment by the Commission as restricted proceedings for ex parte purposes under Section 1.1208 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.1208. Because of the policy implications and potential impact of this proceeding on persons not parties to the waiver request, we believe it would be in the public interest to treat this case as a permit-but-disclose proceeding under the ex parte rules. See Sections 1.1200(a), 1.1206 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. ��
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2082A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2082A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2082A1.txt
  • interested parties an opportunity to comment on the proposed transaction. The petition-to-deny period for these applications ends at close of business on September 3, 2002. 47 C.F.R. �73.3584(a). Applications for consent to the transfer of control of broadcast licenses and authorizations are subject, unless otherwise provided, to treatment by the Commission as restricted proceedings for ex parte purposes under Section 1.1208 of the Commission's rules. 47 C.F.R. �1.1208. We have concluded, however, that classifying this proceeding as permit-but-disclose would, in this case, serve the public interest. Accordingly, by this Public Notice, and pursuant to Section 1.1200(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �1.1200(a), we announce that the ex parte procedures applicable to nonrestricted proceedings will govern our consideration of the instant
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2567A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2567A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2567A1.txt
  • Fax Number for General Correspondence, Public Notice, 16 FCC Rcd 22165 (2001). . For further information regarding the public reference file for this Waiver Request, contact Maria Ringold, Chief, Wireless Branch, RIC, (202) 418-1355. Unless otherwise provided, requests for waiver of the Commission's Rules are subject to treatment by the Commission as restricted proceedings for ex parte purposes under Section 1.1208 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.1208. Because of the policy implications and potential impact of this proceeding on persons not parties to the waiver request, we believe it would be in the public interest to treat this case as a permit-but-disclose proceeding under the ex parte rules. See Sections 1.1200(a), 1.1206 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. ��
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2955A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2955A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2955A1.txt
  • its participation in the competitive bidding process, it may be subject to forfeiture of its upfront payment, down payment, or full bid amount and may be prohibited from participating in future auctions. Ex Parte Rule: Applicants should also be aware that the Commission has generally exempted auction proceedings from the strict requirements of the ex parte rule found in Section 1.1208 of the Commission's rules. Mock Auction: All applicants found to be qualified bidders will be eligible to participate in a mock auction on Thursday, December 5, 2002. We encourage all qualified bidders to take advantage of this mock auction to become familiar with the FCC Automated Auction System. In the Qualified Bidders Public Notice, the Bureau will announce the bidding
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3358A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3358A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3358A1.txt
  • Street, S.W., CY-A257, Washington, D.C. 20554. Comments may be filed regarding the Application Amendment no later than January 3, 2003. Reply comments may be filed no later than January 21, 2003. All filings regarding the Application Amendment should reference CS Docket No. 01-348. EX PARTE STATUS OF THIS PROCEEDING This proceeding is a restricted proceeding pursuant to 47 C.F.R. � 1.1208. Ex parte presentations are prohibited to or from Commission decision-making personnel until the proceeding is no longer subject to administrative reconsideration or review or judicial review. GENERAL INFORMATION Interested parties may file comments as indicated above, and are encouraged to file comments using ECFS. See Electronic Filing of Documents in Rulemaking Proceedings, 63 Fed. Reg. 24,121 (1998). Comments filed through
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3417A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3417A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3417A1.txt
  • Fax Number for General Correspondence, Public Notice, 16 FCC Rcd 22165 (2001). . For further information regarding the public reference file for this Waiver Request, contact Maria Ringold, Chief, Wireless Branch, RIC, (202) 418-1355. Unless otherwise provided, requests for waiver of the Commission's Rules are subject to treatment by the Commission as restricted proceedings for ex parte purposes under Section 1.1208 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.1208. Because of the policy implications and potential impact of this proceeding on persons not parties to the waiver request, we believe it would be in the public interest to treat this case as a permit-but-disclose proceeding under the ex parte rules. See Sections 1.1200(a), 1.1206 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. ��
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3495A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3495A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3495A1.txt
  • Bureau, Reference Information Center, 445 12th Street, S.W. Room CY-B529, Washington, D.C. 20554. . For further information regarding the public reference file for this Request, contact Maria Ringold, Chief, Wireless Branch, RIC, (202) 418-1355. Unless otherwise provided, requests for waiver of the Commission's Rules are subject to treatment by the Commission as restricted proceedings for ex parte purposes under Section 1.1208 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.1208. Because of the policy implications and potential impact of this proceeding on persons not parties to the waiver request, we believe it would be in the public interest to treat this case as a permit-but-disclose proceeding under the ex parte rules, See 47 C.F.R. �� 1.1200(a), 1.1206. Therefore, subsequent to the release
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3549A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3549A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3549A1.txt
  • of the policy implications and potential impact of this proceeding on persons not parties to this request, we believe it would be in the public interest to treat this matter as a permit-but-disclose proceeding under the ex parte rules, see Sections 1.1200(a) and 1.1206 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.1200(a), 1.1206, rather than a restricted proceeding under Section 1.1208 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.1208. Therefore, any ex parte presentations that are made with respect to the issues involved in the subject request, subsequent to the release of this Public Notice, will be permissible but must be disclosed in accordance with the requirements of Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.1206(b). . By the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-371A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-371A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-371A1.txt
  • proceeding (namely GCI and ACS). Any person making an oral presentation in this proceeding regarding issues raised in GCI v. ACS Holdings must provide parties to that proceeding an opportunity to be present at the oral presentation. This procedure must be followed because GCI v. ACS Holdings is a restricted proceeding in which ex parte presentations are prohibited under section 1.1208 of the Commission's rules. Interested parties are to file any written ex parte presentations in this proceeding with the Commission's Acting Secretary, William F. Caton, 445 12th Street, S.W., TW-B204, Washington, D.C. 20554, and serve with three copies: Competitive Pricing Division, Common Carrier Bureau, 445 12th Street, S.W., Room 5-A233, Washington, D.C. 20554, Attn: Douglas Slotten. Parties shall also serve
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-4A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-4A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-4A1.txt
  • to adjust one of its winning bids in Auction No. 35. The remaining portion of Qualcomm's ADV could be used to adjust winning bids in another FCC auction, including Auction No. 82. Ex Parte Rule: Applicants should also be aware that the Commission has generally exempted auction proceedings from the strict requirements of the ex parte rule found in Section 1.1208 of the Commission's rules. Mock Auction: All applicants found to be qualified bidders will be eligible to participate in a mock auction on Thursday, January 31, 2002. We encourage all qualified bidders to take advantage of this mock auction to become familiar with the Internet Bidding System. In a future Qualified Bidders Public Notice, the Bureau will announce the bidding
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-512A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-512A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-512A1.txt
  • Bureau. Reference Information Center, 445 12th Street, S.W. Room CY-B529, Washington, D.C. 20554. . For further information regarding the public reference file for this Request, contact Maria Ringold, Chief, Wireless Branch, RIC, (202) 418-1355. Unless otherwise provided, requests for waiver of the Commission's Rules are subject to treatment by the Commission as restricted proceedings for ex parte purposes under Section 1.1208 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.1208. Because of the policy implications and potential impact of this proceeding on persons not parties to the waiver request, we believe it would be in the public interest to treat this case as a permit-but-disclose proceeding under the ex parte rules, See 47 C.F.R. �� 1.1200(a), 1.1206. Therefore, subsequent to the release
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-584A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-584A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-584A1.txt
  • Data Service operations, and Private Operational Fixed Microwave Service operations. The parties do not dispute that Northpoint personnel met on several occasions with Commission decisionmakers to discuss the Broadwave and Pegasus applications. At issue is whether Northpoint complied with the ex parte rules applicable to these meetings. This question turns on whether the respective applications were deemed ``restricted'' under Section 1.1208 or ``permit-but-disclose'' under Section 1.1206 of the Commission's Rules. If the former, Northpoint was prohibited from meeting with decisionmakers without giving Pegasus advance notice and an opportunity to be present; if the latter, Northpoint need only have filed an appropriate memorandum summarizing the meeting in the record of the proceeding. Northpoint attempted to comply with the permit- but-disclose procedures by
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-599A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-599A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-599A1.txt
  • Room CY-B402, Washington, DC, 20554, telephone 202-863-2893, facsimile 202-863-2898, or via e-mail qualexint@aol.com. For further information regarding the public reference file for these waiver requests contact Maria Ringold, Chief, Wireless Branch, RIC, (202) 418-1355. Unless otherwise provided, requests for waiver of the Commission's Rules are subject to treatment by the Commission as restricted proceedings for ex parte purposes under Section 1.1208 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.1208. Because of the policy implications and potential impact of this proceeding on persons not parties to the waiver request, we believe it would be in the public interest to treat this case as a permit-but-disclose proceeding under the ex parte rules. See Sections 1.1200(a) and 1.1206 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-640A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-640A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-640A1.txt
  • to provide the Commission with quarterly updates on the status of development and deployment throughout the waiver period, including a full disclosure of any requests for a TDMA TTY-compatible handsets received during the quarter. Unless otherwise provided, requests for waiver of the Commission's Rules are subject to treatment by the Commission as restricted proceedings for ex parte purposes under Section 1.1208 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.1208. Because of the policy implications and potential impact of this proceeding on persons not parties to the waiver requests, we believe it would be in the public interest to treat this case as a permit-but-disclose proceeding under the ex parte rules. See Sections 1.1200(a), 1.1206 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. ��
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-768A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-768A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-768A1.txt
  • May 28, 2002. Qwest states that, based on these developments, it will require a six-month extension beyond the June 30, 2002, deadline in order to identify and address any potential reliability and interoperability concerns. Unless otherwise provided, requests for waiver of the Commission's Rules are subject to treatment by the Commission as restricted proceedings for ex parte purposes under Section 1.1208 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.1208. Because of the policy implications and potential impact of this proceeding on persons not parties to the waiver requests, we believe it would be in the public interest to treat this case as a permit-but-disclose proceeding under the ex parte rules. See Sections 1.1200(a), 1.1206 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. ��
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-769A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-769A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-769A1.txt
  • Bureau, Reference Information Center, 445 12th Street, S.W. Room CY-B529, Washington, D.C. 20554. . For further information regarding the public reference file for this Request, contact Maria Ringold, Chief, Wireless Branch, RIC, (202) 418-1355. Unless otherwise provided, requests for waiver of the Commission's Rules are subject to treatment by the Commission as restricted proceedings for ex parte purposes under Section 1.1208 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.1208. Because of the policy implications and potential impact of this proceeding on persons not parties to the waiver request, we believe it would be in the public interest to treat this case as a permit-but-disclose proceeding under the ex parte rules, See 47 C.F.R. �� 1.1200(a), 1.1206. Therefore, subsequent to the release
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-916A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-916A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-916A1.txt
  • TTY digital handsets for TDMA. Amarillo and High Plains state that they intend to complete the necessary hardware and software upgrades in a reasonably short time frame as soon as Lucent provides the upgrades. Unless otherwise provided, requests for waiver of the Commission's Rules are subject to treatment by the Commission as restricted proceedings for ex parte purposes under Section 1.1208 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.1208. Because of the policy implications and potential impact of this proceeding on persons not parties to the waiver request, we believe it would be in the public interest to treat this case as a permit-but-disclose proceeding under the ex parte rules. See Sections 1.1200(a), 1.1206 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. ��
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-965A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-965A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-965A1.txt
  • to adjust one of its winning bids in Auction No. 35. The remaining portion of Qualcomm's ADV could be used to adjust winning bids in another FCC auction, including Auction No. 45. Ex Parte Rule: Applicants should also be aware that the Commission has generally exempted auction proceedings from the strict requirements of the ex parte rule found in Section 1.1208 of the Commission's rules. Mock Auction: All applicants found to be qualified bidders will be eligible to participate in a mock auction on Thursday, May 23, 2002. We encourage all qualified bidders to take advantage of this mock auction to become familiar with the FCC Automated Auction System. In the Qualified Bidders Public Notice, the Bureau will announce the bidding
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-993A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-993A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-993A1.txt
  • intends to use reasonable efforts to migrate all of its existing TDMA customers to the CDMA system by 2007. Also on April 28, 2002, ACSW deployed 911 TTY technology in its new CDMA network. Unless otherwise provided, requests for waiver of the Commission's Rules are subject to treatment by the Commission as restricted proceedings for ex parte purposes under Section 1.1208 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.1208. Because of the policy implications and potential impact of this proceeding on persons not parties to the waiver petition, we believe it would be in the public interest to treat this case as a permit-but-disclose proceeding under the ex parte rules. See Sections 1.1200(a), 1.1206 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. ��
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1049A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1049A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1049A1.txt
  • to adjust one of its winning bids in Auction No. 35. The remaining portion of Qualcomm's ADV could be used to adjust winning bids in another FCC auction, including Auction No. 46. Ex Parte Rule: Applicants should also be aware that the Commission has generally exempted auction proceedings from the strict requirements of the ex parte rule found in Section 1.1208 of the Commission's rules. Mock Auction: All applicants found to be qualified bidders will be eligible to participate in a mock auction on Friday, April 25, 2003. We encourage all qualified bidders to take advantage of this mock auction to become familiar with the FCC Automated Auction System. In the Qualified Bidders Public Notice, the Bureau will announce the bidding
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1090A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1090A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1090A1.txt
  • to adjust one of its winning bids in Auction No. 35. The remaining portion of Qualcomm's ADV could be used to adjust winning bids in another FCC auction, including Auction No. 48. Ex Parte Rule: Applicants should also be aware that the Commission has generally exempted auction proceedings from the strict requirements of the ex parte rule found in Section 1.1208 of the Commission's rules. Mock Auction: All applicants found to be qualified bidders will be eligible to participate in a mock auction on Thursday, May 8, 2003. We encourage all qualified bidders to take advantage of this mock auction to become familiar with the FCC Automated Auction System. In the Qualified Bidders Public Notice, the Bureau will announce the bidding
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1140A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1140A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1140A1.txt
  • Bureau, Reference Information Center, 445 12th Street, S.W., Room CY-B529, Washington, D.C. 20554. . For further information regarding the public reference file for this Request, contact Maria Ringold, Chief, Wireless Branch, RIC, (202) 418-1355. Unless otherwise provided, requests for waiver of the Commission's Rules are subject to treatment by the Commission as restricted proceedings for ex parte purposes under Section 1.1208 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.1208. Because of the policy implications and potential impact of this proceeding on persons not parties to the waiver request, we believe it would be in the public interest to treat this case as a permit-but-disclose proceeding under the ex parte rules, See 47 C.F.R. �� 1.1200(a), 1.1206. Therefore, subsequent to the release
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1221A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1221A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1221A1.txt
  • to adjust one of its winning bids in Auction No. 35. The remaining portion of Qualcomm's ADV could be used to adjust winning bids in another FCC auction, including Auction No. 49. Ex Parte Rule: Applicants should also be aware that the Commission has generally exempted auction proceedings from the strict requirements of the ex parte rule found in Section 1.1208 of the Commission's rules. Mock Auction: All applicants found to be qualified bidders will be eligible to participate in a mock auction on Thursday, May 22, 2003. We encourage all qualified bidders to take advantage of this mock auction to become familiar with the FCC Automated Auction System. In the Qualified Bidders Public Notice, the Bureau will announce the bidding
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1484A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1484A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1484A1.txt
  • of the policy implications and potential impact of this proceeding on persons not parties to this request, we believe it would be in the public interest to treat this matter as a permit-but-disclose proceeding under the ex parte rules, see Sections 1.1200(a) and 1.1206 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.1200(a), 1.1206, rather than a restricted proceeding under Section 1.1208 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.1208. Therefore, any ex parte presentations that are made with respect to the issues involved in the subject request, subsequent to the release of this Public Notice, will be allowed but must be disclosed in accordance with the requirements of Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.1206(b). . By the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1532A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1532A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1532A1.txt
  • to be acceptable for filing. The Commission reserves the right to return any transfer of control application if, upon further examination, it is determined to be defective and not in conformance with the Commission's rules and policies. Final action will not be taken on the applications earlier than 31 days following the date of this Public Notice. Pursuant to section 1.1208 of the Commission's rules, the ex parte status of this proceeding is designated as "restricted" because the Commission has determined that the proceeding is neither "exempt" under section 1.1204(b) nor "permit-but-disclose" under section 1.1206(a) of the Commission's rules. All filings concerning any or all matters in this Public Notice should refer to IB Docket No. 03-115. Pursuant to Sections 1.415
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1770A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1770A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1770A1.txt
  • of the Universal Service Administrative Company (``Administrator''), rejecting Funding Year 2002 requests for discounts under the schools and libraries universal service support mechanism. They request that the Commission reverse the Administrator's decisions and award full funding. Requests for Review of decisions by the Administrator are subject to treatment by the Commission as restricted proceedings for ex parte purposes under section 1.1208 of the Commission's rules, unless otherwise provided. Pursuant to section 1.1200(a) of the Commission's rules, we hereby designate these cases as permit-but-disclose proceedings under the ex parte rules. Therefore, any ex parte presentations that are made with respect to the issues involved in the subject requests will be permissible but must be disclosed in accordance with the requirements of section
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1948A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1948A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1948A1.txt
  • Fax Number for General Correspondence, Public Notice, 16 FCC Rcd 22165 (2001). . For further information regarding the public reference file for this Waiver Request, contact Maria Ringold, Chief, Wireless Branch, RIC, (202) 418-1355. Unless otherwise provided, requests for waiver of the Commission's Rules are subject to treatment by the Commission as restricted proceedings for ex parte purposes under Section 1.1208 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.1208. Because of the policy implications and potential impact of this proceeding on persons not parties to the waiver request, we believe it would be in the public interest to treat this case as a permit-but-disclose proceeding under the ex parte rules. See Sections 1.1200(a), 1.1206 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. ��
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2061A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2061A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2061A1.txt
  • safety radio system. In particular, El Segundo seeks to use the six frequencies, paired as follows: 506/509.075, 506/509.100, 506/509.125 MHz (the ``Channels'') to support the operations of its police and fire officers. Unless otherwise provided, applications and requests for waiver of the Commission's Rules are subject to treatment by the Commission as restricted proceedings for ex parte purposes under Section 1.1208 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.1208. Because of the policy implications and potential impact of this proceeding on persons not parties to the waiver request, we believe it would be in the public interest to treat this case as a permit-but-disclose proceeding under the ex parte rules, see 47 C.F.R. �� 1.1200(a), 1.1206. Therefore, subsequent to the release
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2098A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2098A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2098A1.txt
  • its participation in the competitive bidding process, it may be subject to forfeiture of its upfront payment, down payment, or full bid amount and may be prohibited from participating in future auctions. Ex Parte Rule: Applicants should also be aware that the Commission has generally exempted auction proceedings from the strict requirements of the ex parte rule found in Section 1.1208 of the Commission's rules. Mock Auction: All applicants found to be qualified bidders will be eligible to participate in a mock auction on Friday, July 18, 2003. We encourage all qualified bidders to take advantage of this mock auction to become familiar with the FCC Automated Auction System. In the Qualified Bidders Public Notice, the Bureau will announce the bidding
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2206A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2206A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2206A1.txt
  • of the Universal Service Administrative Company (``Administrator''), rejecting Funding Year 2002 requests for discounts under the schools and libraries universal service support mechanism. They request that the Commission reverse the Administrator's decisions and award full funding. Requests for Review of decisions by the Administrator are subject to treatment by the Commission as restricted proceedings for ex parte purposes under section 1.1208 of the Commission's rules, unless otherwise provided. Pursuant to section 1.1200(a) of the Commission's rules, we hereby designate these cases as permit-but-disclose proceedings under the ex parte rules. Therefore, any ex parte presentations that are made with respect to the issues involved in the subject requests will be permissible but must be disclosed in accordance with the requirements of section
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2223A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2223A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2223A1.txt
  • of the policy implications and potential impact of this proceeding on persons not parties to this request, we believe it would be in the public interest to treat this matter as a permit-but-disclose proceeding under the ex parte rules, see Sections 1.1200(a) and 1.1206 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.1200(a), 1.1206, rather than a restricted proceeding under Section 1.1208 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.1208. Therefore, any ex parte presentations that are made with respect to the issues involved in the subject request, subsequent to the release of this Public Notice, will be allowed but must be disclosed in accordance with the requirements of Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.1206(b). . By the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2658A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2658A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2658A1.txt
  • its down payment on licenses it won in Auction No. 49. The remaining $48,240,565.96 of Qualcomm's ADV could be used to adjust winning bids in another FCC Auction, including Auction No. 50. Ex Parte Rule: Applicants should also be aware that the Commission has generally exempted auction proceedings from the strict requirements of the ex parte rule found in Section 1.1208 of the Commission's rules. Mock Auction: All applicants found to be qualified bidders will be eligible to participate in a mock auction on Friday, September 19, 2003. We encourage all qualified bidders to take advantage of this mock auction to become familiar with the FCC Automated Auction System. In the Qualified Bidders Public Notice, the Bureau will announce the bidding
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2659A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2659A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2659A1.txt
  • its down payment on licenses it won in Auction No. 49. The remaining $48,240,565.96 of Qualcomm's ADV could be used to adjust winning bids in another FCC Auction, including Auction No. 51. Ex Parte Rule: Applicants should also be aware that the Commission has generally exempted auction proceedings from the strict requirements of the ex parte rule found in Section 1.1208 of the Commission's rules. Mock Auction: All applicants found to be qualified bidders will be eligible to participate in a mock auction on Wednesday, September 17, 2003 and Thursday, September 18, 2003. We encourage all qualified bidders to take advantage of this mock auction to become familiar with the FCC Automated Auction System. In the Qualified Bidders Public Notice, the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2666A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2666A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2666A1.txt
  • Bureau, Reference Information Center, 445 12th Street, S.W. Room CY-B529, Washington, D.C. 20554. . For further information regarding the public reference file for this Request, contact Maria Ringold, Chief, Wireless Branch, RIC, (202) 418-1355. Unless otherwise provided, requests for waiver of the Commission's Rules are subject to treatment by the Commission as restricted proceedings for ex parte purposes under Section 1.1208 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.1208. Because of the policy implications and potential impact of this proceeding on persons not parties to the waiver request, we believe it would be in the public interest to treat this case as a permit-but-disclose proceeding under the ex parte rules, See 47 C.F.R. �� 1.1200(a), 1.1206. Therefore, subsequent to the release
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2684A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2684A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2684A1.txt
  • � 1.46(a) (2002) (``It is the policy of the Commission that extensions of time shall not be routinely granted.''). Moreover, with respect to the LRT Reply, we are unable to determine that LRT served the parties as required by the Commission's ex parte rules. See 47 C.F.R. �� 1.1200-1.1216 (2002). As this is a restricted proceeding, see 47 C.F.R. � 1.1208 (2002), we are referring the LRT Reply to the Commission's Office of General Counsel (``OGC'') as a possible prohibited ex parte presentation. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.1212(c) (2002) (prohibited written ex parte presentations shall be forwarded to OGC). Because we are dismissing the LRT Reply, with prejudice, as procedurally deficient, see infra � 9, we are not considering the LRT
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2832A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2832A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2832A1.txt
  • Washington, D.C. 20554. All filings must be addressed to the Commission's Secretary, Office of the Secretary, Federal Communications Commission. or call the Consumer & Governmental Affairs Bureau at (202) 418-0531 (voice), (202) 418-7365 (TTY). Unless otherwise provided, requests for waiver of the Commission's rules are subject to treatment by the Commission as restricted proceedings for ex parte purposes under Section 1.1208 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.1208. Because of the policy implications and potential impact of this proceeding on persons not parties to the waiver request, we believe it would be in the public interest to treat this case as a permit-but-disclose proceeding under the ex parte rules, See 47 C.F.R. �� 1.1200(a), 1.1206. Therefore, subsequent to the release
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2986A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2986A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2986A1.txt
  • Room CY-B402, Washington, D.C. 20554, (202) 863-2893, facsimile (202) 863-2898, or via-e-mail qualexint@aol.com. For further information regarding the public reference file for this waiver request, contact Maria Ringold, Chief, Wireless Branch, RIC, (202) 418-1355. Unless otherwise provided, requests for waiver of the Commission's Rules are subject to treatment by the Commission as restricted proceedings for ex parte purposes under Section 1.1208 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.1208. Because of the policy implications and potential impact of this proceeding on persons not parties to the waiver request, we believe it would be in the public interest to treat this case as a permit-but-disclose proceeding under the ex parte rules, See 47 C.F.R. �� 1.1200(a), 1.1206. Therefore, subsequent to the release
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3029A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3029A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3029A1.txt
  • representation indicates that AT&T and WorldCom satisfied the requirement to notify Verizon of their motion under section 1.46(c) of the Commission's rules. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.46(c). We note that our rules prohibit the filing of replies to oppositions to stay motions, and that any such replies, if filed, ``will not be considered.'' 47 C.F.R. � 1.45(d). 47 C.F.R. � 1.1208. (...continued from previous page) (Continued....) Federal Communications Commission DA 03-3029 Federal Communications Commission DA 03-3029 . = � � � �@��� h� �@��� F '' � �
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3031A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3031A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3031A1.txt
  • for filing. The Commission reserves the right to return any application if, upon further examination, it is determined to be defective and not in conformance with the Commission's rules or policies. Final action on these applications will not be taken earlier than thirty-one days following the date of this Public Notice. This proceeding is a restricted proceeding pursuant to section 1.1208 of the Commission's rules. Ex Parte presentations are prohibited to or from Commission decision-making personnel until the proceeding is no longer subject to administrative reconsideration or review or judicial review. Interested parties must file petitions to deny no later than November 5, 2003. Persons and entities that file petitions to deny become parties to the proceeding. They may participate fully
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3121A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3121A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3121A1.txt
  • Comments''). CWA, which represents employees and retirees of the Frontier companies that formerly were owned by Global Crossing, argues that the Applicants have failed to demonstrate the public interest benefits of the proposed transaction, and therefore asks the Commission to deny the transfers of control and petition for declaratory ruling. See id. at 5. See also 47 C.F.R. �� 1.1200(a), 1.1208 (once a petition to deny is filed against an application for authority under Title III, the proceeding becomes a restricted ex parte proceeding in which ex parte presentations to the Commission generally are prohibited). Motion for Continued Deferral, IB Docket No. 02-286 (filed Oct. 21, 2002) (``DOJ/FBI Motion''). On September 26, 2003, the DOJ/FBI filed a pleading requesting that the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3585A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3585A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3585A1.txt
  • of the policy implications and potential impact of this proceeding on persons not parties to this request, we believe it would be in the public interest to treat this matter as a permit-but-disclose proceeding under the ex parte rules, see Sections 1.1200(a) and 1.1206 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.1200(a), 1.1206, rather than a restricted proceeding under Section 1.1208 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.1208. Therefore, any ex parte presentations that are made with respect to the issues involved in the subject request, subsequent to the release of this Public Notice, will be allowed but must be disclosed in accordance with the requirements of Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.1206(b). . By the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3669A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3669A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3669A1.txt
  • of the policy implications and potential impact of this proceeding on persons not parties to this request, we believe it would be in the public interest to treat this matter as a permit-but-disclose proceeding under the ex parte rules, see Sections 1.1200(a) and 1.1206 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.1200(a), 1.1206, rather than a restricted proceeding under Section 1.1208 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.1208. Therefore, any ex parte presentations that are made with respect to the issues involved in the subject request, subsequent to the release of this Public Notice, will be allowed but must be disclosed in accordance with the requirements of Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.1206(b). . By the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3732A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3732A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3732A1.txt
  • Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit DA 03-3732 Released: November 21, 2003 NOTICE OF EX PARTE PRESENTATIONS IN THE MATTER OF COMPLAINTS AGAINST VARIOUS BROADCAST LICENSEES REGARDING THEIR AIRING OF THE "GOLDEN GLOBE AWARDS" PROGRAM (EB FILE NO. 03-IH-0110) Notice is hereby given that ex parte presentations falling under Commission Rules 1.1208 and 1.1212, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.1208, 1.1212, and concerning the above-referenced proceeding (EB File No. 03-IH-0110) have been received by the Commission. Consistent with section 1.1208 of the Commission's Rules, any presentation must be served on the parties to the proceeding if it: (1) addresses the merits or outcome of a restricted proceeding and (2) is directed to decision-making personnel
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3781A3.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3781A3.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3781A3.txt
  • make its final payment on licenses it won in that Auction. The remaining $13,791,582.31 of Qualcomm's ADV could be used to adjust winning bids in another FCC Auction, including Auction No. 53. Ex Parte Rule: Applicants should also be aware that the Commission has generally exempted auction proceedings from the strict requirements of the ex parte rule found in Section 1.1208 of the Commission's rules. Mock Auction: All applicants found to be qualified bidders will be eligible to participate in a mock auction on Friday, January 9, 2004. We encourage all qualified bidders to take advantage of this mock auction to become familiar with the FCC Automated Auction System. In the Qualified Bidders Public Notice, the Bureau will announce the bidding
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-486A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-486A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-486A1.txt
  • incurred only by some customers, i.e., presubscribed interexchange carrier (PIC) and PIC change charges, within each class of customer. On February 19, 2002, WorldCom, Inc. and Ad Hoc Telecommunications Users Committee filed oppositions to the Petitioners' requests. Requests for waiver of the Commission's rules are subject to treatment by the Commission as restricted proceedings for ex parte purposes under section 1.1208 of the Commission's rules, unless otherwise provided. Because of the policy implications and the potential impact of this proceeding on consumers, we believe it would be in the public interest to treat this case as a permit-but-disclose proceeding under the ex parte rules. Therefore, any ex parte presentations, subsequent to the release of this Public Notice, that are made with
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-798A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-798A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-798A1.txt
  • of the policy implications and potential impact of this proceeding on persons not parties to this request, we believe it would be in the public interest to treat this matter as a permit-but-disclose proceeding under the ex parte rules, see sections 1.1200(a) and 1.1206 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.1200(a), 1.1206, rather than a restricted proceeding under section 1.1208 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.1208. Therefore, any ex parte presentations that are made with respect to the issues involved in the subject request, subsequent to the release of this Public Notice, will be permissible but must be disclosed in accordance with the requirements of section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.1206(b). . By the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-803A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-803A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-803A1.txt
  • Administrative Company (``Administrator''), rejecting Ysleta's Funding Year 2002 requests for discounts under the schools and libraries universal support mechanism. Ysleta and IBM request that the Commission reverse the Administrator's decision and award full funding for Ysleta. Requests for Review of decisions by the Administrator are subject to treatment by the Commission as restricted proceedings for ex parte purposes under section 1.1208 of the Commission's rules, unless otherwise provided. Pursuant to section 1.1200(a) of the Commission's rules, we hereby designate these cases as a permit-but-disclose proceedings under the ex parte rules. Therefore, any ex parte presentations that are made with respect to the issues involved in the subject requests, will be permissible but must be disclosed in accordance with the requirements of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-859A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-859A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-859A1.txt
  • Bureau, Reference Information Center, 445 12th Street, S.W., Room CY-B529, Washington, D.C. 20554. . For further information regarding the public reference file for this Request, contact Maria Ringold, Chief, Wireless Branch, RIC, (202) 418-1355. Unless otherwise provided, requests for waiver of the Commission's Rules are subject to treatment by the Commission as restricted proceedings for ex parte purposes under Section 1.1208 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.1208. Because of the policy implications and potential impact of this proceeding on persons not parties to the waiver request, we believe it would be in the public interest to treat this case as a permit-but-disclose proceeding under the ex parte rules, See 47 C.F.R. �� 1.1200(a), 1.1206. Therefore, subsequent to the release
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-860A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-860A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-860A1.txt
  • Mail, and Priority Mail should be addressed to 445 12th Street, SW, Washington, D.C. 20554. All filings must be addressed to the Commission's Secretary, Office of the Secretary, Federal Communications Commission. facsimile: (202) 863-2898; phone: (202) 863-2893. Requests for waiver of the Commission's rules are subject to treatment by the Commission as restricted proceedings for ex parte purposes under section 1.1208 of the Commission's rules unless otherwise provided. Because of the policy implications and the potential impact of this proceeding on consumers, we believe it would be in the public interest to treat this case as a permit-but-disclose proceeding under the ex parte rules. Therefore, an ex parte presentation subsequent to the release of this Public Notice, that are made with
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-865A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-865A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-865A1.txt
  • Bureau, Reference Information Center, 445 12th Street, S.W., Room CY-B529, Washington, D.C. 20554. . For further information regarding the public reference file for this Request, contact Maria Ringold, Chief, Wireless Branch, RIC, (202) 418-1355. Unless otherwise provided, requests for waiver of the Commission's Rules are subject to treatment by the Commission as restricted proceedings for ex parte purposes under Section 1.1208 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.1208. Because of the policy implications and potential impact of this proceeding on persons not parties to the waiver request, we believe it would be in the public interest to treat this case as a permit-but-disclose proceeding under the ex parte rules, see 47 C.F.R. �� 1.1200(a), 1.1206. Therefore, subsequent to the release
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-90A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-90A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-90A1.txt
  • Bureau, Reference Information Center, 445 12th Street, S.W., Room CY-B529, Washington, D.C. 20554. . For further information regarding the public reference file for this Request, contact Maria Ringold, Chief, Wireless Branch, RIC, (202) 418-1355. Unless otherwise provided, requests for waiver of the Commission's Rules are subject to treatment by the Commission as restricted proceedings for ex parte purposes under Section 1.1208 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.1208. Because of the policy implications and potential impact of this proceeding on persons not parties to the waiver request, we believe it would be in the public interest to treat this case as a permit-but-disclose proceeding under the ex parte rules, See 47 C.F.R. �� 1.1200(a), 1.1206. Therefore, subsequent to the release
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1012A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1012A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1012A1.txt
  • of the policy implications and potential impact of this proceeding on persons not parties to this request, we believe it would be in the public interest to treat this matter as a permit-but-disclose proceeding under the ex parte rules, see Sections 1.1200(a) and 1.1206 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.1200(a), 1.1206, rather than a restricted proceeding under Section 1.1208 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.1208. Therefore, any ex parte presentations that are made with respect to the issues involved in the subject request, subsequent to the release of this Public Notice, will be allowed but must be disclosed in accordance with the requirements of Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.1206(b). For further information,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1021A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1021A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1021A1.txt
  • of the policy implications and potential impact of this proceeding on persons not parties to this request, we believe it would be in the public interest to treat this matter as a permit-but-disclose proceeding under the ex parte rules, see Sections 1.1200(a) and 1.1206 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.1200(a), 1.1206, rather than a restricted proceeding under Section 1.1208 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.1208. Therefore, any ex parte presentations that are made with respect to the issues involved in the subject request, subsequent to the release of this Public Notice, will be allowed but must be disclosed in accordance with the requirements of Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.1206(b). or Jay.oconnor@fcc.gov. By
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-122A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-122A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-122A1.txt
  • of the policy implications and potential impact of this proceeding on persons not parties to this request, we believe it would be in the public interest to treat this matter as a permit-but-disclose proceeding under the ex parte rules, see Sections 1.1200(a) and 1.1206 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.1200(a), 1.1206, rather than a restricted proceeding under Section 1.1208 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.1208. Therefore, any ex parte presentations that are made with respect to the issues involved in the subject request, subsequent to the release of this Public Notice, will be allowed but must be disclosed in accordance with the requirements of Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.1206(b). Action by the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1593A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1593A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1593A1.txt
  • CY-B402, Washington, D.C. 20554, (202) 863-2893, facsimile (202) 863-2898, or via e-mail qualexint@aol.com. For further information regarding the public reference file for this Waiver Request, contact Maria Ringold, Chief, Wireless Branch, RIC, (202) 418-1355. Unless otherwise provided, requests for waiver of the Commission's Rules are subject to treatment by the Commission as restricted proceedings for ex parte purposes under Section 1.1208 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.1208. Because of the policy implications and potential impact of this proceeding on persons not parties to the waiver request, we believe it would be in the public interest to treat this case as a permit-but-disclose proceeding under the ex parte rules. See Sections 1.1200(a), 1.1206 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. ��
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1638A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1638A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1638A1.txt
  • its participation in the competitive bidding process, it may be subject to forfeiture of its upfront payment, down payment, or full bid amount and may be prohibited from participating in future auctions. Ex Parte Rule: Applicants should also be aware that the Commission has generally exempted auction proceedings from the strict requirements of the ex parte rule found in Section 1.1208 of the Commission's rules. Mock Auction: All applicants found to be qualified bidders will be eligible to participate in a mock auction on Friday, July 9, 2004. We encourage all qualified bidders to take advantage of this mock auction to become familiar with the FCC Automated Auction System. In the Qualified Bidders Public Notice, the Bureau will announce the bidding
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-16A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-16A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-16A1.txt
  • make its final payment on licenses it won in that auction. The remaining $13,791,582.31 of Qualcomm's ADV could be used to adjust winning bids in another FCC auction, including Auction No. 55. Ex Parte Rule: Applicants should also be aware that the Commission has generally exempted auction proceedings from the strict requirements of the ex parte rule found in Section 1.1208 of the Commission's rules. Mock Auction: All applicants found to be qualified bidders will be eligible to participate in a mock auction on Friday, February 6, 2004. We encourage all qualified bidders to take advantage of this mock auction to become familiar with the FCC Automated Auction System. In the Qualified Bidders Public Notice, the Bureau will announce the bidding
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1727A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1727A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1727A1.txt
  • its participation in the competitive bidding process, it may be subject to forfeiture of its upfront payment, down payment, or full bid amount and may be prohibited from participating in future auctions. Ex Parte Rule: Applicants should also be aware that the Commission has generally exempted auction proceedings from the strict requirements of the ex parte rule found in Section 1.1208 of the Commission's rules. Mock Auction: All applicants found to be qualified bidders will be eligible to participate in a mock auction on Friday, July 23, 2004. We encourage all qualified bidders to take advantage of this mock auction to become familiar with the FCC Automated Auction System. In the Qualified Bidders Public Notice, the Bureau will announce the bidding
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1921A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1921A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1921A1.txt
  • Fax Number for General Correspondence, Public Notice, 16 FCC Rcd 22165 (2001). . For further information regarding the public reference file for this Waiver Request, contact Maria Ringold, Chief, Wireless Branch, RIC, (202) 418-1355. Unless otherwise provided, requests for waiver of the Commission's Rules are subject to treatment by the Commission as restricted proceedings for ex parte purposes under Section 1.1208 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.1208. Because of the policy implications and potential impact of this proceeding on persons not parties to the waiver request, we believe it would be in the public interest to treat this case as a permit-but-disclose proceeding under the ex parte rules. See Sections 1.1200(a), 1.1206 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. ��
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2022A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2022A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2022A1.txt
  • of the policy implications and potential impact of this proceeding on persons not parties to this request, we believe it would be in the public interest to treat this matter as a permit-but-disclose proceeding under the ex parte rules, see Sections 1.1200(a) and 1.1206 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.1200(a), 1.1206, rather than a restricted proceeding under Section 1.1208 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.1208. Therefore, any ex parte presentations that are made with respect to the issues involved in the subject request, subsequent to the release of this Public Notice, will be allowed but must be disclosed in accordance with the requirements of Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.1206(b). . By the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2026A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2026A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2026A1.txt
  • CY-B402, Washington, D.C. 20554, (202) 863-2893, facsimile (202) 863-2898, or via e-mail qualexint@aol.com. For further information regarding the public reference file for this Waiver Request, contact Maria Ringold, Chief, Wireless Branch, RIC, (202) 418-1355. Unless otherwise provided, requests for waiver of the Commission's Rules are subject to treatment by the Commission as restricted proceedings for ex parte purposes under Section 1.1208 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.1208. Because of the policy implications and potential impact of this proceeding on persons not parties to the waiver request, we believe it would be in the public interest to treat this case as a permit-but-disclose proceeding under the ex parte rules. See Sections 1.1200(a), 1.1206 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. ��
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2034A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2034A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2034A1.txt
  • program. A copy of NEC's waiver request, plea agreement, and supplement to the waiver request is attached to this Public Notice. We seek comment on NEC BNS's petition, in light of the novel relief that it requests. Requests for waiver of the Commission's rules are subject to treatment by the Commission as restricted proceedings for ex parte purposes under section 1.1208 of the Commission's rules unless otherwise provided. Because this request may implicate broadly applicable policy issues, we believe it would be in the public interest to treat this case as a permit-but-disclose proceeding under the ex parte rules. Ex parte presentations that are made with respect to the issues involved in the petition will be allowed but must be disclosed
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2468A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2468A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2468A1.txt
  • its participation in the competitive bidding process, it may be subject to forfeiture of its upfront payment, down payment, or full bid amount and may be prohibited from participating in future auctions. Ex Parte Rule: Applicants should also be aware that the Commission has generally exempted auction proceedings from the strict requirements of the ex parte rule found in Section 1.1208 of the Commission's rules. Mock Auction: All applicants found to be qualified bidders will be eligible to participate in a mock auction on Friday, September 10, 2004. We encourage all qualified bidders to take advantage of this mock auction to become familiar with the FCC Automated Auction System. In the Qualified Bidders Public Notice, the Bureau will announce the bidding
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2840A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2840A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2840A1.txt
  • phone at (202) 488-5300 or (800) 378-3160, or by facsimile at (202) 488-5563. For further information regarding the public reference file for this waiver request, contact Maria Ringold, Chief, Wireless Branch, RIC, (202) 418-1355. Unless otherwise provided, requests for waiver of the Commission's Rules are subject to treatment by the Commission as restricted proceedings for ex parte purposes under Section 1.1208 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.1208. Because of the policy implications and potential impact of this proceeding on persons not parties to the waiver request, we believe it would be in the public interest to treat this case as a permit-but-disclose proceeding under the ex parte rules. See Sections 1.1200(a), 1.1206 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. ��
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2948A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2948A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2948A1.txt
  • its participation in the competitive bidding process, it may be subject to forfeiture of its upfront payment, down payment, or full bid amount and may be prohibited from participating in future auctions. Ex Parte Rule: Applicants should also be aware that the Commission has generally exempted auction proceedings from the strict requirements of the ex parte rule found in Section 1.1208 of the Commission's rules. Two Day Mock Auction: All applicants found to be qualified bidders will be eligible to participate in a two day mock auction on Thursday and Friday, October 28-29, 2004. We encourage all qualified bidders to take advantage of this mock auction to become familiar with the FCC Automated Auction System. In the Qualified Bidders Public Notice,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2948A1_Erratum.doc
  • its participation in the competitive bidding process, it may be subject to forfeiture of its upfront payment, down payment, or full bid amount and may be prohibited from participating in future auctions. Ex Parte Rule: Applicants should also be aware that the Commission has generally exempted auction proceedings from the strict requirements of the ex parte rule found in Section 1.1208 of the Commission's rules. Two Day Mock Auction: All applicants found to be qualified bidders will be eligible to participate in a two day mock auction on Thursday and Friday, October 28-29, 2004. We encourage all qualified bidders to take advantage of this mock auction to become familiar with the FCC Automated Auction System. In the Qualified Bidders Public Notice,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3159A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3159A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3159A1.txt
  • of the policy implications and potential impact of this proceeding on persons not parties to this request, we believe it would be in the public interest to treat this matter as a permit-but-disclose proceeding under the ex parte rules, see Sections 1.1200(a) and 1.1206 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.1200(a), 1.1206, rather than a restricted proceeding under Section 1.1208 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.1208. Therefore, any ex parte presentations that are made with respect to the issues involved in the subject request, subsequent to the release of this Public Notice, will be allowed but must be disclosed in accordance with the requirements of Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.1206(b). Action by the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-327A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-327A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-327A1.txt
  • of the policy implications and potential impact of this proceeding on persons not parties to this request, we believe it would be in the public interest to treat this matter as a permit-but-disclose proceeding under the ex parte rules, see Sections 1.1200(a) and 1.1206 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.1200(a), 1.1206, rather than a restricted proceeding under Section 1.1208 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.1208. Therefore, any ex parte presentations that are made with respect to the issues involved in the subject request, subsequent to the release of this Public Notice, will be allowed but must be disclosed in accordance with the requirements of Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.1206(b). . By the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3478A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3478A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3478A1.txt
  • phone at (202) 488-5300 or (800) 378-3160, or by facsimile at (202) 488-5563. For further information regarding the public reference file for this waiver request, contact Maria Ringold, Chief, Wireless Branch, RIC, (202) 418-1355. Unless otherwise provided, requests for waiver of the Commission's Rules are subject to treatment by the Commission as restricted proceedings for ex parte purposes under Section 1.1208 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.1208. Because of the policy implications and potential impact of this proceeding on persons not parties to the waiver request, we believe it would be in the public interest to treat this case as a permit-but-disclose proceeding under the ex parte rules. See Sections 1.1200(a), 1.1206 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. ��
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3600A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3600A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3600A1.txt
  • phone at (202) 488-5300 or (800) 378-3160, or by facsimile at (202) 488-5563. For further information regarding the public reference file for this waiver request, contact Maria Ringold, Chief, Wireless Branch, RIC, (202) 418-1355. Unless otherwise provided, requests for waiver of the Commission's Rules are subject to treatment by the Commission as restricted proceedings for ex parte purposes under Section 1.1208 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.1208. Because of the policy implications and potential impact of this proceeding on persons not parties to the waiver request, we believe it would be in the public interest to treat this case as a permit-but-disclose proceeding under the ex parte rules. See Sections 1.1200(a), 1.1206 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. ��
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3601A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3601A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3601A1.txt
  • phone at (202) 488-5300 or (800) 378-3160, or by facsimile at (202) 488-5563. For further information regarding the public reference file for this waiver request, contact Maria Ringold, Chief, Wireless Branch, RIC, (202) 418-1355. Unless otherwise provided, requests for waiver of the Commission's Rules are subject to treatment by the Commission as restricted proceedings for ex parte purposes under Section 1.1208 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.1208. Because of the policy implications and potential impact of this proceeding on persons not parties to the waiver request, we believe it would be in the public interest to treat this case as a permit-but-disclose proceeding under the ex parte rules. See Sections 1.1200(a), 1.1206 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. ��
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-378A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-378A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-378A1.txt
  • of the policy implications and potential impact of this proceeding on persons not parties to this request, we believe it would be in the public interest to treat this matter as a permit-but-disclose proceeding under the ex parte rules, see Sections 1.1200(a) and 1.1206 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.1200(a), 1.1206, rather than a restricted proceeding under Section 1.1208 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.1208. Therefore, any ex parte presentations that are made with respect to the issues involved in the subject request, subsequent to the release of this Public Notice, will be allowed but must be disclosed in accordance with the requirements of Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.1206(b). . By the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3916A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3916A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3916A1.txt
  • phone at (202) 488-5300 or (800) 378-3160, or by facsimile at (202) 488-5563. For further information regarding the public reference file for this waiver request, contact Maria Ringold, Chief, Wireless Branch, RIC, (202) 418-1355. Unless otherwise provided, requests for waiver of the Commission's Rules are subject to treatment by the Commission as restricted proceedings for ex parte purposes under Section 1.1208 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.1208. Because of the policy implications and potential impact of this proceeding on persons not parties to the waiver request, we believe it would be in the public interest to treat this case as a permit-but-disclose proceeding under the ex parte rules. See Sections 1.1200(a), 1.1206 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. ��
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3918A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3918A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3918A1.txt
  • its participation in the competitive bidding process, it may be subject to forfeiture of its upfront payment, down payment, or full bid amount and may be prohibited from participating in future auctions. Ex Parte Rule: Applicants should also be aware that the Commission has generally exempted auction proceedings from the strict requirements of the ex parte rule found in Section 1.1208 of the Commission's rules. Mock Auction: All applicants found to be qualified bidders will be eligible to participate in a mock auction on Friday, January 21, 2005. We encourage all qualified bidders to take advantage of this mock auction to become familiar with the FCC Automated Auction System. In the Qualified Bidders Public Notice, the Bureau will announce the bidding
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-402A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-402A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-402A1.txt
  • will continue to treat this matter as not subject to the ex parte rules until such time as further developments (e.g., any issuance of a notice of apparent liability for forfeiture) would render the proceeding restricted. For further information, contact William D. Freedman at (202) 418-1415. Action by Chief, Investigations and Hearings Division, Enforcement Bureau See 47 C.F.R. �� 1.1202(d)(2), 1.1208. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.1200(a). See 47 C.F.R. �� 1.1202(d)(3), 1.1208. PUBLIC NOTICE Federal Communications Commission 445 12th St., S.W. Washington, D.C. 20554 News Media Information 202 / 418-0500 Internet: http://www.fcc.gov TTY: 1-888-835-5322 - J s t '' - . / 2 J K L O s t | ~ � � � � � ` `` '' � �
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-731A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-731A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-731A1.txt
  • of the policy implications and potential impact of this proceeding on persons not parties to this request, we believe it would be in the public interest to treat this matter as a permit-but-disclose proceeding under the ex parte rules, see Sections 1.1200(a) and 1.1206 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.1200(a), 1.1206, rather than a restricted proceeding under Section 1.1208 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.1208. Therefore, any ex parte presentations that are made with respect to the issues involved in the subject request, subsequent to the release of this Public Notice, will be allowed but must be disclosed in accordance with the requirements of Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.1206(b). Action by the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-779A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-779A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-779A1.txt
  • of the policy implications and potential impact of this proceeding on persons not parties to this request, we believe it would be in the public interest to treat this matter as a permit-but-disclose proceeding under the ex parte rules, see Sections 1.1200(a) and 1.1206 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.1200(a), 1.1206, rather than a restricted proceeding under Section 1.1208 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.1208. Therefore, any ex parte presentations that are made with respect to the issues involved in the subject request, subsequent to the release of this Public Notice, will be allowed but must be disclosed in accordance with the requirements of Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.1206(b). . Action by
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-77A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-77A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-77A1.txt
  • Fax Number for General Correspondence, Public Notice, 16 FCC Rcd 22165 (2001). . For further information regarding the public reference file for this Waiver Request, contact Maria Ringold, Chief, Wireless Branch, RIC, (202) 418-1355. Unless otherwise provided, requests for waiver of the Commission's Rules are subject to treatment by the Commission as restricted proceedings for ex parte purposes under Section 1.1208 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.1208. Because of the policy implications and potential impact of this proceeding on persons not parties to the waiver request, we believe it would be in the public interest to treat this case as a permit-but-disclose proceeding under the ex parte rules. See Sections 1.1200(a), 1.1206 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. ��
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-783A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-783A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-783A1.txt
  • of the policy implications and potential impact of this proceeding on persons not parties to this request, we believe it would be in the public interest to treat this matter as a permit-but-disclose proceeding under the ex parte rules, see Sections 1.1200(a) and 1.1206 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.1200(a), 1.1206, rather than a restricted proceeding under Section 1.1208 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.1208. Therefore, any ex parte presentations that are made with respect to the issues involved in the subject request, subsequent to the release of this Public Notice, will be allowed but must be disclosed in accordance with the requirements of Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.1206(b). For further information,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-800A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-800A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-800A1.txt
  • are due April 22, 2004. Comments may be filed using the Commission's Electronic Comment Filing System (ECFS) or by filing paper copies. Comments and reply comments should be filed in the docket number, CC Docket No. 95-116. Requests for waiver of the Commission's rules are subject to treatment by the Commission as restricted proceedings for ex parte purposes under section 1.1208 of the Commission's rules unless otherwise provided. Because of the policy implications and the potential impact of this proceeding on consumers, we believe it would be in the public interest to treat this case as a permit-but-disclose proceeding under the ex parte rules. Ex parte presentations that are made with respect to the issues involved in the petitions will be
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-114A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-114A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-114A1.txt
  • phone at (202) 488-5300 or (800) 378-3160, or by facsimile at (202) 488-5563. For further information regarding the public reference file for this waiver request, contact Maria Ringold, Chief, Wireless Branch, RIC, (202) 418-1355. Unless otherwise provided, requests for waiver of the Commission's Rules are subject to treatment by the Commission as restricted proceedings for ex parte purposes under Section 1.1208 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.1208. Because of the policy implications and potential impact of this proceeding on persons not parties to the waiver request, we believe it would be in the public interest to treat this case as a permit-but-disclose proceeding under the ex parte rules. See Sections 1.1200(a), 1.1206 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. ��
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1158A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1158A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1158A1.txt
  • the above-captioned application and petition for declaratory ruling on January 10, 2005. Both filings were placed on public notice on February 4, 2005. The Boeing Company filed comments on the application and the petition. ICO notes that Section 1.1206(a)(3) of the Commission's rules routinely classifies declaratory ruling proceedings as ``permit-but-disclose,'' while application proceedings are routinely classified as ``restricted'' under Section 1.1208. ICO maintains that it would serve the public interest to designate the proceeding with respect to its modification application as permit-but-disclose in order to harmonize the proceeding's ex parte status with the status of the interrelated declaratory-ruling proceeding to facilitate discussion of complex technical, legal, and policy issues with the Commission's staff. Boeing, the only party that filed comments or
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1590A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1590A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1590A1.txt
  • the extension, we will set a deadline that will give the parties a reasonable time to conclude discussions. Accordingly, we will extend the deadline for filing of the response for seven calendar days, until June 10, 2005. In addition, on our own motion, we designate this proceeding as ``permit-but-disclose'' for purposes of the Commission's rules governing ex parte communications. Section 1.1208 of the Commission's rules routinely classifies applications for authority under Title III of the Communications Act as ``restricted,'' meaning that no presentation are permitted unless both parties have the opportunity to be present for oral presentation and to be served personally with all written presentations. We find, however, that designating the proceeding as ``permit-but-disclose'' would facilitate the discussion between the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1590A1_Erratum.doc
  • the extension, we will set a deadline that will give the parties a reasonable time to conclude discussions. Accordingly, we will extend the deadline for filing of the response for seven calendar days, until June 10, 2005. In addition, on our own motion, we designate this proceeding as ``permit-but-disclose'' for purposes of the Commission's rules governing ex parte communications. Section 1.1208 of the Commission's rules routinely classifies applications for authority under Title III of the Communications Act as ``restricted,'' meaning that no presentation are permitted unless both parties have the opportunity to be present for oral presentation and to be served personally with all written presentations. We find, however, that designating the proceeding as ``permit-but-disclose'' would facilitate the discussion between the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1650A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1650A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1650A1.txt
  • view of the unique or unusual circumstances of the instant case, application of the rule(s) would be inequitable, unduly burdensome or contrary to the public interest or in the applicant has no reasonable alternative. Requests for waiver of the Commission's Rules are subject, unless otherwise provided, to treatment by the Commission as restricted proceedings for ex parte purposes under Section 1.1208 of the Commission's Rules. However, because Verizon Wireless' request implicates important public safety and Homeland Security considerations, we believe it would be in the public interest to treat the waiver request as a permit-but-disclose proceeding as allowed by the Commission's ex parte rules. Therefore, ex parte presentations that are made with respect to the issues involved in the subject waiver
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1662A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1662A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1662A1.txt
  • of the policy implications and potential impact of this proceeding on persons not parties to this request, we believe it would be in the public interest to treat this matter as a permit-but-disclose proceeding under the ex parte rules, see Sections 1.1200(a) and 1.1206 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.1200(a), 1.1206, rather than a restricted proceeding under Section 1.1208 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.1208. Therefore, any ex parte presentations that are made with respect to the issues involved in the subject request, subsequent to the release of this Public Notice, will be allowed but must be disclosed in accordance with the requirements of Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.1206(b). or Moslem.Sawez@fcc.gov. By
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1665A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1665A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1665A1.txt
  • phone at (202) 488-5300 or (800) 378-3160, or by facsimile at (202) 488-5563. For further information regarding the public reference file for this waiver request, contact Maria Ringold, Chief, Wireless Branch, RIC, (202) 418-1355. Unless otherwise provided, requests for waiver of the Commission's Rules are subject to treatment by the Commission as restricted proceedings for ex parte purposes under Section 1.1208 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.1208. Because of the policy implications and potential impact of this proceeding on persons not parties to the waiver request, we believe it would be in the public interest to treat this case as a permit-but-disclose proceeding under the ex parte rules. See Sections 1.1200(a), 1.1206 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. ��
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1694A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1694A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1694A1.txt
  • its participation in the competitive bidding process, it may be subject to forfeiture of its upfront payment, down payment, or full bid amount and may be prohibited from participating in future auctions. Ex Parte Rule: Applicants should also be aware that the Commission has generally exempted auction proceedings from the strict requirements of the ex parte rule found in Section 1.1208 of the Commission's rules. Mock Auction: All applicants found to be qualified bidders will be eligible to participate in a mock auction on Monday, July 18, 2005. We encourage all qualified bidders to take advantage of this mock auction to become familiar with the FCC's Integrated Spectrum Auction System (``FCC Auction System'' or ``ISAS''). In the public notice announcing the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1713A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1713A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1713A1.txt
  • its participation in the competitive bidding process, it may be subject to forfeiture of its upfront payment, down payment, or full bid amount and may be prohibited from participating in future auctions. Ex Parte Rule: Applicants should also be aware that the Commission has generally exempted auction proceedings from the strict requirements of the ex parte rule found in Section 1.1208 of the Commission's rules. Mock Auction: All applicants found to be qualified bidders will be eligible to participate in a mock auction on Monday, August 1, 2005. We encourage all qualified bidders to take advantage of this mock auction to become familiar with the FCC's Integrated Spectrum Auction System (``FCC Auction System'' or ``ISAS''). In the public notice announcing the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1767A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1767A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1767A1.txt
  • phone at (202) 488-5300 or (800) 378-3160, or by facsimile at (202) 488-5563. For further information regarding the public reference file for this waiver request, contact Maria Ringold, Chief, Wireless Branch, RIC, (202) 418-1355. Unless otherwise provided, requests for waiver of the Commission's Rules are subject to treatment by the Commission as restricted proceedings for ex parte purposes under Section 1.1208 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.1208. Because of the policy implications and potential impact of this proceeding on persons not parties to the waiver request, we believe it would be in the public interest to treat this case as a permit-but-disclose proceeding under the ex parte rules. See Sections 1.1200(a), 1.1206 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. ��
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1768A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1768A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1768A1.txt
  • phone at (202) 488-5300 or (800) 378-3160, or by facsimile at (202) 488-5563. For further information regarding the public reference file for this waiver request, contact Maria Ringold, Chief, Wireless Branch, RIC, (202) 418-1355. Unless otherwise provided, requests for waiver of the Commission's Rules are subject to treatment by the Commission as restricted proceedings for ex parte purposes under Section 1.1208 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.1208. Because of the policy implications and potential impact of this proceeding on persons not parties to the waiver request, we believe it would be in the public interest to treat this case as a permit-but-disclose proceeding under the ex parte rules. See Sections 1.1200(a), 1.1206 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. ��
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1769A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1769A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1769A1.txt
  • phone at (202) 488-5300 or (800) 378-3160, or by facsimile at (202) 488-5563. For further information regarding the public reference file for this waiver request, contact Maria Ringold, Chief, Wireless Branch, RIC, (202) 418-1355. Unless otherwise provided, requests for waiver of the Commission's Rules are subject to treatment by the Commission as restricted proceedings for ex parte purposes under Section 1.1208 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.1208. Because of the policy implications and potential impact of this proceeding on persons not parties to the waiver request, we believe it would be in the public interest to treat this case as a permit-but-disclose proceeding under the ex parte rules. See Sections 1.1200(a), 1.1206 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. ��
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1782A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1782A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1782A1.txt
  • Commission's Secretary, Office of the Secretary, Federal Communications Commission. See FCC Announces a New Filing Location for Paper Documents and a New Fax Number for General Correspondence, Public Notice, 16 FCC Rcd 22165 (2001). Unless otherwise provided, requests for waiver of the Commission's Rules are subject to treatment by the Commission as restricted proceedings for ex parte purposes under Section 1.1208 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.1208. Because of the policy implications and potential impact of this proceeding on persons not parties to the waiver request, we believe it would be in the public interest to treat this case as a permit-but-disclose proceeding under the ex parte rules. See Sections 1.1200(a), 1.1206 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. ��
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1934A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1934A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1934A1.txt
  • phone at (202) 488-5300 or (800) 378-3160, or by facsimile at (202) 488-5563. For further information regarding the public reference file for this waiver request, contact Maria Ringold, Chief, Wireless Branch, RIC, (202) 418-1355. Unless otherwise provided, requests for waiver of the Commission's Rules are subject to treatment by the Commission as restricted proceedings for ex parte purposes under Section 1.1208 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.1208. Because of the policy implications and potential impact of this proceeding on persons not parties to the waiver request, we believe it would be in the public interest to treat this case as a permit-but-disclose proceeding under the ex parte rules. See Sections 1.1200(a), 1.1206 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. ��
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1978A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1978A1.txt
  • Lockheed Martin Corporation to Marlene Dortch, Secretary, Federal Communications Commission, dated July 6, 2005 (voluntary dismissal of application to launch and operate a radionavigation satellite service satellite at 131.8 degrees E.L.) INFORMATIVE S2115 SAT-MOD-20050301-00054 Globalstar LLC The application captioned above is a licensing proceeding and is generally restricted under the Commission's ex parte rules. See 47 C.F.R. �� 1.1202(d) and 1.1208. On July 6, 2005, Globalstar LLC and Globalstar USA, LLC filed a request to designate Files Nos. SAT-MOD-20050301-0054 and SES-MOD-20050301-00261, as "permit-but-disclose" under the Commission's ex parte rules. See Letter from William T. Lake, Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr, LLP, Counsel to Globalstar LLC and Globalstar USA LLC to Marlene H. Dortch, Secretary, Federal Communications Commission. The issues raised
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2033A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2033A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2033A1.txt
  • of the policy implications and potential impact of this proceeding on persons not parties to this request, we believe it would be in the public interest to treat this matter as a permit-but-disclose proceeding under the ex parte rules, see Sections 1.1200(a) and 1.1206 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.1200(a), 1.1206, rather than a restricted proceeding under Section 1.1208 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.1208. Therefore, any ex parte presentations that are made with respect to the issues involved in the subject request, subsequent to the release of this Public Notice, will be allowed but must be disclosed in accordance with the requirements of Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.1206(b). For further information,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2229A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2229A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2229A1.txt
  • its participation in the competitive bidding process, it may be subject to forfeiture of its upfront payment, down payment, or full bid amount and may be prohibited from participating in future auctions. Ex Parte Rule: Applicants should also be aware that the Commission has generally exempted auction proceedings from the strict requirements of the ex parte rule found in Section 1.1208 of the Commission's rules. Mock Auction: All applicants found to be qualified bidders will be eligible to participate in a mock auction on Monday, September 12, 2005. We encourage all qualified bidders to take advantage of this mock auction to become familiar with the FCC's Integrated Spectrum Auction System (``FCC Auction System'' or ``ISAS''). In the public notice announcing the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2272A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2272A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2272A1.txt
  • Service (WCS) licenses held by WCS Wireless License Subsidiary, LLC from WCS Wireless to XM Satellite Radio. This application appeared on public notice as accepted for filing on July 20, 2005. Applications for consent to the transfer of control of licenses are subject, unless otherwise provided, to treatment by the Commission as restricted proceedings for ex parte purposes under section 1.1208 of the Commission's rules. However, pursuant to section 1.1200(a) of the Commission's rules, the Commission may modify the applicable ex parte procedures in particular proceedings if the public interest so requires. We announce that this application proceeding will be governed by permit-but-disclose ex parte procedures that are applicable to non-restricted proceedings under section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules. Parties making
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2292A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2292A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2292A1.txt
  • April 22, 2005, Senator Gregg forwarded Fisher's correspondence to the Commission and indicated that: ``I would appreciate your review of Mr. Fisher's letter and any information you might provide regarding the status of this issue which I may share with my constituent.'' The Senator's letter gave no indication that it was served on Saga, as required by 47 C.F.R. � 1.1208, which prohibits ex parte presentations in restricted proceedings such as application proceedings. 5. Saga contends that Northeast violated the ex parte rules by unfairly attempting to use political pressure to persuade the Commission to take action against Saga's application. Saga notes that in past cases the Commission has found violations of the ex parte rules where a party has solicited
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2377A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2377A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2377A1.txt
  • phone at (202) 488-5300 or (800) 378-3160, or by facsimile at (202) 488-5563. For further information regarding the public reference file for this waiver request, contact Maria Ringold, Chief, Wireless Branch, RIC, (202) 418-1355. Unless otherwise provided, requests for waiver of the Commission's Rules are subject to treatment by the Commission as restricted proceedings for ex parte purposes under Section 1.1208 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.1208. Because of the policy implications and potential impact of this proceeding on persons not parties to the waiver request, we believe it would be in the public interest to treat this case as a permit-but-disclose proceeding under the ex parte rules. See Sections 1.1200(a), 1.1206 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. ��
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2515A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2515A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2515A1.txt
  • threatened...'' See 47 C.F.R. � 1.1204(a)(3). Section 1.1200(a) of the Commission's rules also provides, in pertinent part, that ``[w]here the public interest so requires in a particular proceeding, the Commission and its staff retain the discretion to modify the applicable ex parte rules by order, letter or public notice.'' 47 C.F.R. � 1.1204(a)(3). As explained in note 1 to Section 1.1208 of the Commission's rules, if an application is uncontested, the party and the Commission may freely make presentations. Once additional ``parties'' as defined by Section 1.1202(d) are involved in the proceeding, however, then pursuant to Section 1.1208 of the Commission's rules the proceeding is treated as restricted and ex parte presentations are prohibited. 47 C.F.R. � 1.1208. PUBLIC NOTICE Federal
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2670A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2670A1.txt
  • P. Janka, Counsel for Inmarsat Global Limited, to Donald Abelson, Chief, International Bureau, Federal Communications Commission, dated Oct. 4, 2005. We find that designating the application as "permit-but-disclose" will facilitate resolution of the complex policy issues raised by the application. Thus, we designate IBFS File No. SAT-PPL-20050926-00184 as "permit-but-disclose," effective October 5, 2005. See 47 C.F.R. �� 1.1200(a), 1.1206 and 1.1208, Note 2. This action is without prejudice to any determination regarding the processing of the application. Page 3 of 3
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2732A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2732A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2732A1.txt
  • its participation in the competitive bidding process, it may be subject to forfeiture of its upfront payment, down payment, or full bid amount and may be prohibited from participating in future auctions. Ex Parte Rule: Applicants should also be aware that the Commission has generally exempted auction proceedings from the strict requirements of the ex parte rule found in Section 1.1208 of the Commission's rules. Mock Auction: All applicants found to be qualified bidders will be eligible to participate in a mock auction on Monday, December 5, 2005. We encourage all qualified bidders to take advantage of this mock auction to become familiar with the FCC's Integrated Spectrum Auction System (``FCC Auction System'' or ``ISAS''). In the Qualified Bidders Public Notice,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2763A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2763A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2763A1.txt
  • threatened...'' See 47 C.F.R. � 1.1204(a)(3). Section 1.1200(a) of the Commission's rules also provides, in pertinent part, that ``[w]here the public interest so requires in a particular proceeding, the Commission and its staff retain the discretion to modify the applicable ex parte rules by order, letter or public notice.'' 47 C.F.R. � 1.1204(a)(3). As explained in note 1 to Section 1.1208 of the Commission's rules, if an application is uncontested, the party and the Commission may freely make presentations. Once additional ``parties'' as defined by Section 1.1202(d) are involved in the proceeding, however, then pursuant to Section 1.1208 of the Commission's rules the proceeding is treated as restricted and ex parte presentations are prohibited. 47 C.F.R. � 1.1208. PUBLIC NOTICE Federal
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2892A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2892A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2892A1.txt
  • its participation in the competitive bidding process, it may be subject to forfeiture of its upfront payment, down payment, or full bid amount and may be prohibited from participating in future auctions. Ex Parte Rule: Applicants should also be aware that the Commission has generally exempted auction proceedings from the strict requirements of the ex parte rule found in Section 1.1208 of the Commission's rules. Mock Auction: All applicants found to be qualified bidders will be eligible to participate in a mock auction on Monday and Tuesday, January 9-10, 2006. We encourage all qualified bidders to take advantage of this mock auction to become familiar with the FCC's Integrated Spectrum Auction System (``FCC Auction System'' or ``ISAS''). In the public notice
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3033A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3033A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3033A1.txt
  • phone at (202) 488-5300 or (800) 378-3160, or by facsimile at (202) 488-5563. For further information regarding the public reference file for this waiver request, contact Maria Ringold, Chief, Wireless Branch, RIC, (202) 418-1355. Unless otherwise provided, requests for waiver of the Commission's Rules are subject to treatment by the Commission as restricted proceedings for ex parte purposes under Section 1.1208 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.1208. Because of the policy implications and potential impact of this proceeding on persons not parties to the waiver request, we believe it would be in the public interest to treat this case as a permit-but-disclose proceeding under the ex parte rules. See Sections 1.1200(a), 1.1206 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. ��
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3035A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3035A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3035A1.txt
  • of the policy implications and potential impact of this proceeding on persons not parties to this request, we believe it would be in the public interest to treat this matter as a permit-but-disclose proceeding under the ex parte rules, see Sections 1.1200(a) and 1.1206 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.1200(a), 1.1206, rather than a restricted proceeding under Section 1.1208 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.1208. Therefore, any ex parte presentations that are made with respect to the issues involved in the subject request, subsequent to the release of this Public Notice, will be allowed but must be disclosed in accordance with the requirements of Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.1206(b). For further information,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3036A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3036A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3036A1.txt
  • phone at (202) 488-5300 or (800) 378-3160, or by facsimile at (202) 488-5563. For further information regarding the public reference file for this waiver request, contact Maria Ringold, Chief, Wireless Branch, RIC, (202) 418-1355. Unless otherwise provided, requests for waiver of the Commission's Rules are subject to treatment by the Commission as restricted proceedings for ex parte purposes under Section 1.1208 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.1208. Because of the policy implications and potential impact of this proceeding on persons not parties to the waiver request, we believe it would be in the public interest to treat this case as a permit-but-disclose proceeding under the ex parte rules. See Sections 1.1200(a), 1.1206 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. ��
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3151A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3151A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3151A1.txt
  • phone at (202) 488-5300 or (800) 378-3160, or by facsimile at (202) 488-5563. For further information regarding the public reference file for this waiver request, contact Maria Ringold, Chief, Wireless Branch, RIC, (202) 418-1355. Unless otherwise provided, requests for waiver of the Commission's Rules are subject to treatment by the Commission as restricted proceedings for ex parte purposes under Section 1.1208 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.1208. Because of the policy implications and potential impact of this proceeding on persons not parties to the waiver request, we believe it would be in the public interest to treat this case as a permit-but-disclose proceeding under the ex parte rules. See Sections 1.1200(a), 1.1206 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. ��
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3174A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3174A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3174A1.txt
  • 12th Street, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20554. All filings must be addressed to the Commission's Secretary, Marlene H. Dortch, Office of the Secretary, Federal Communications Commission, 445 12th Street, SW, Room TW-B204, Washington, DC 20554. Unless otherwise provided, requests for waiver of the Commission's rules are subject to treatment by the Commission as restricted proceedings for ex parte purposes under section 1.1208 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.1208. Because of the potential impact of this proceeding on persons not parties to the Waiver Request, this proceeding shall be treated as a permit-but-disclose proceeding under the ex parte rules, which are codified at 47 C.F.R. �� 1.1200(a), 1.1206. Therefore, ex parte presentations will be allowed but must be disclosed in accordance
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-606A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-606A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-606A1.txt
  • by phone at (202) 488-5300 or (800) 378-3160, or by facsimile at (202) 488-5563. For further information regarding the public reference file for these applications, contact Maria Ringold, Chief, Wireless Branch, RIC, (202) 418-1355. Unless otherwise provided, requests for waiver of the Commission's Rules are subject to treatment by the Commission as restricted proceedings for ex parte purposes under Section 1.1208 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.1208. Because of the policy implications and potential impact of these proceedings on persons not parties to waiver requests, we believe it would be in the public interest to treat these cases as permit-but-disclose proceedings under the ex parte rules. See Sections 1.1200(a), 1.1206 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.1200(a), 1.1206.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-693A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-693A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-693A1.txt
  • its participation in the competitive bidding process, it may be subject to forfeiture of its upfront payment, down payment, or full bid amount and may be prohibited from participating in future auctions. Ex Parte Rule: Applicants should also be aware that the Commission has generally exempted auction proceedings from the strict requirements of the ex parte rule found in Section 1.1208 of the Commission's rules. Mock Auction: All applicants found to be qualified bidders will be eligible to participate in a mock auction on Thursday, April 21, 2005. We encourage all qualified bidders to take advantage of this mock auction to become familiar with the FCC Automated Auction System. In the Qualified Bidders Public Notice, the Bureau will announce the bidding
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-87A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-87A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-87A1.txt
  • of the policy implications and potential impact of this proceeding on persons not parties to this request, we believe it would be in the public interest to treat this matter as a permit-but-disclose proceeding under the ex parte rules, see Sections 1.1200(a) and 1.1206 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.1200(a), 1.1206, rather than a restricted proceeding under Section 1.1208 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.1208. Therefore, any ex parte presentations that are made with respect to the issues involved in the subject request, subsequent to the release of this Public Notice, will be allowed but must be disclosed in accordance with the requirements of Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.1206(b). . By the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1182A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1182A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1182A1.txt
  • phone at (202) 488-5300 or (800) 378-3160, or by facsimile at (202) 488-5563. For further information regarding the public reference file for this waiver request, contact Maria Ringold, Chief, Wireless Branch, RIC, (202) 418-1355. Unless otherwise provided, requests for waiver of the Commission's Rules are subject to treatment by the Commission as restricted proceedings for ex parte purposes under Section 1.1208 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.1208. Because of the policy implications and potential impact of this proceeding on persons not parties to the waiver request, we believe it would be in the public interest to treat this case as a permit-but-disclose proceeding under the ex parte rules. See Sections 1.1200(a), 1.1206 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. ��
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1247A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1247A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1247A1.txt
  • and the transfer of control of interests in Alaska Digitel to General Communication, Inc. (``GCI''). These applications appeared on public notice as accepted for filing on February 1, 2006. Applications for consent to the assignment or transfer of control of licenses are subject, unless otherwise provided, to treatment by the Commission as restricted proceedings for ex parte purposes under section 1.1208 of the Commission's rules. However, pursuant to section 1.1200(a) of the Commission's rules, the Commission may modify the applicable ex parte procedures in particular proceedings if the public interest so requires. We announce that this proceeding will be governed by permit-but-disclose ex parte procedures that are applicable to non-restricted proceedings under section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules. Parties making oral
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1333A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1333A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1333A1.txt
  • have coordinated the disposition of the ex parte allegations in this NAL with the Commission's Office of the General Counsel. 47 C.F.R. �� 1.1200 et seq. Amendments filed October 19, 2004 and November 9, 2004. These amendments were filed electronically and were available for viewing through the Commission's CDBS Public Access system. See Note 16, supra. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.1208. 47 C.F.R. � 1.1204(a)(1). See Association for Community Education, Inc., Memorandum Opinion and Order, 19 FCC Rcd 12682 (2004). See 47 C.F.R. � 1.1202(d) (definition of a ``presentation''). 47 U.S.C. � 309(k)(1). The renewal standard was amended to read as described by Section 204(a) of the Telecommunications Act of 1996, Pub. L. No. 104-104, 110 Stat. 56 (1996). See Implementation
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1402A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1402A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1402A1.txt
  • its participation in the competitive bidding process, it may be subject to forfeiture of its upfront payment, down payment, or full bid amount and may be prohibited from participating in future auctions. Ex Parte Rule: Applicants should also be aware that the Commission has generally exempted auction proceedings from the strict requirements of the ex parte rule found in Section 1.1208 of the Commission's rules. Mock Auction: All applicants found to be qualified bidders will be eligible to participate in a mock auction on Monday, August 7, 2006. We encourage all qualified bidders to take advantage of this opportunity to become familiar with the FCC Auction System. In the Auction 66 Qualified Bidders Public Notice, the Bureau will announce the bidding
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1454A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1454A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1454A1.txt
  • By this Public Notice, we designate Sinclair's Declaratory Ruling as CSR 7039-C. On July 19, 2006, Suddenlink filed an Emergency Request for Designation as ``Permit-But-Disclose'' Proceeding, for Ex Parte Contacts, and Expedited Review (``Emergency Ex Parte Request'') requesting that the Commission designate Section 1.1206 ``permit-but-disclose'' ex parte status for its Complaint, rather than ``restricted'' ex parte status pursuant to Section 1.1208 of the Commission's rules. Suddenlink asserts that this ex parte designation will allow informal discussions that will simplify and expedite a timely resolution of its Complaint. Also on July 19, 2006, Sinclair filed an Opposition to Suddenlink's Emergency Ex Parte Request arguing that such request would permit adjudication of Suddenlink's Complaint without affording Sinclair the right to file an opposition.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1511A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1511A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1511A1.txt
  • phone at (202) 488-5300 or (800) 378-3160, or by facsimile at (202) 488-5563. For further information regarding the public reference file for this waiver request, contact Maria Ringold, Chief, Wireless Branch, RIC, (202) 418-1355. Unless otherwise provided, requests for waiver of the Commission's Rules are subject to treatment by the Commission as restricted proceedings for ex parte purposes under Section 1.1208 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.1208. Because of the policy implications and potential impact of this proceeding on persons not parties to the waiver request, we believe it would be in the public interest to treat this case as a permit-but-disclose proceeding under the ex parte rules. See Sections 1.1200(a), 1.1206 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. ��
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1560A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1560A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1560A1.txt
  • phone at (202) 488-5300 or (800) 378-3160, or by facsimile at (202) 488-5563. For further information regarding the public reference file for this waiver request, contact Maria Ringold, Chief, Wireless Branch, RIC, (202) 418-1355. Unless otherwise provided, requests for waiver of the Commission's Rules are subject to treatment by the Commission as restricted proceedings for ex parte purposes under Section 1.1208 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.1208. Because of the policy implications and potential impact of this proceeding on persons not parties to the waiver request, we believe it would be in the public interest to treat this case as a permit-but-disclose proceeding under the ex parte rules. See Sections 1.1200(a), 1.1206 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. ��
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1593A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1593A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1593A1.txt
  • District (SDCCD) filed an application to modify the facilities of noncommercial educational Station KSDS(FM), San Diego, California. SDCCD proposes to upgrade KSDS(FM) from Class A to Class B1 and to increase effective radiated power to 22 kW. Applications for broadcast authorizations are subject, unless otherwise provided, to treatment by the Commission as restricted proceedings for ex parte purposes under Section 1.1208 of the Commission's rules. 47 C.F.R. � 1.1208. We have concluded, however, that classifying this proceeding as permit-but-disclose would, in this case, serve the public interest. Accordingly, by this Public Notice, and pursuant to Section 1.1200(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.1200(a), we announce that the ex parte procedures applicable to nonrestricted proceedings will govern our consideration of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1664A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1664A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1664A1.txt
  • Location for Paper Documents and a New Fax Number for General Correspondence, Public Notice, 16 FCC Rcd 22165 (2001). , by phone at (202) 488-5300 or (800) 378-3160, or by facsimile at (202) 488-5563. Unless otherwise provided, requests for waiver of the Commission's Rules are subject to treatment by the Commission as restricted proceedings for ex parte purposes under Section 1.1208 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.1208. Because of the policy implications and potential impact of this proceeding on persons not parties to the waiver request, we believe it would be in the public interest to treat this case as a permit-but-disclose proceeding under the ex parte rules. See Sections 1.1200(a), 1.1206 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. ��
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1973A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1973A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1973A1.txt
  • phone at (202) 488-5300 or (800) 378-3160, or by facsimile at (202) 488-5563. For further information regarding the public reference file for this waiver request, contact Maria Ringold, Chief, Wireless Branch, RIC, (202) 418-1355. Unless otherwise provided, requests for waiver of the Commission's Rules are subject to treatment by the Commission as restricted proceedings for ex parte purposes under Section 1.1208 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.1208. Because of the policy implications and potential impact of this proceeding on persons not parties to the waiver request, we believe it would be in the public interest to treat this case as a permit-but-disclose proceeding under the ex parte rules. See Sections 1.1200(a), 1.1206 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. ��
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-224A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-224A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-224A1.txt
  • that were not presented to the mediator for consideration during mediation. Any material not conforming to the foregoing restrictions will be stricken. Reply filings and filings by third parties are not permitted. Parties may file other documents or pleadings only if specifically requested by the Commission. The de novo review proceeding is a restricted proceeding within the meaning of Section 1.1208 of the Commission's rules and ex parte presentations are prohibited. , with a copy thereof served electronically on the opposing party. These documents must also comply with Section 1.49 of the Commission's rules. Documents must not be filed using the Commission's Electronic Comment Filing System (ECFS). The first page of any statement or other document filed by a party shall
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2266A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2266A1.txt
  • Internet: http://www.fcc.gov (or ftp.fcc.gov) TTY (202) 418-2555 DA No. 06-2266 Thursday November 2, 2006 SAT-00401 Report No. POLICY BRANCH INFORMATION INFORMATIVE SAT-STA-20061002-00114 XM Radio Inc. Request for Special Temporary Authority for 30 days. This application seeks authority to operate under Title III of the Communications Act and is generally restricted under the Commission's ex parte rules. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.1208. In order to develop a full and complete record in this proceeding, the Bureau concludes that the public interest will be served by designating this proceeding as "permit-but-disclose" for purposes of the Commission's rules governing ex parte communications. 47 C.F.R. �� 1.1200(a) and 1.1206. This action is without prejudice to any determination regarding the processing of the application. SAT-STA-20061013-00119 XM
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2274A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2274A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2274A1.txt
  • ``Permit-But-Disclose'' Proceeding and for Ex Parte Contacts in connection with its Complaint. On November 3, 2006, Sinclair filed an Opposition to Emergency Request for Designation as ``Permit-But-Disclose Proceeding and for Ex Parte Contacts. Although a retransmission consent complaint pursuant to Section 76.65 is ordinarily treated as a ``restricted'' proceeding in which ex parte presentations are generally prohibited pursuant to Section 1.1208 of the Commission's rules, the Commission, or its staff pursuant to delegated authority, under Section 1.1200(a), may adopt modified ex parte procedures in particular proceedings ``where the public interest so requires.'' Mediacom's Complaint raises time sensitive policy issues as to the carriage of the stations on Mediacom's systems. In view of this and in order to assure the staff's ability
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2283A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2283A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2283A1.txt
  • 12th Street, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20554. All filings must be addressed to the Commission's Secretary, Marlene H. Dortch, Office of the Secretary, Federal Communications Commission, 445 12th Street, SW, Room TW-B204, Washington, DC 20554. Unless otherwise provided, requests for waiver of the Commission's rules are subject to treatment by the Commission as restricted proceedings for ex parte purposes under section 1.1208 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.1208. Because of the potential impact of this proceeding on persons not parties to the Waiver Request, this proceeding shall be treated as a permit-but-disclose proceeding under the ex parte rules, which are codified at 47 C.F.R. �� 1.1200(a), 1.1206. Therefore, ex parte presentations will be allowed but must be disclosed in accordance
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2317A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2317A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2317A1.txt
  • of the Commission's ex parte rules. On August 9, 2005, OP LLC filed an application and related request seeking waiver of Section 27.50(f)(1), which specifies a peak 2 kW Equivalent Isotropically Radiated Power (EIRP) limit for fixed and base station operations in the 1670-1675 MHz band. OP LLC's application and waiver request are restricted for ex parte purposes under Section 1.1208. On November 2, 2006, Aloha Partners, L.P. filed an Informal Request for Commission Action under Section 1.41, in which it opposes grant of OP LLC's application unless the Commission concurrently increases power limits for licensees in the 700 MHz and several other bands in WT Docket No. 03-264. WT Docket No. 03-264 is a pending permit-but-disclose rulemaking proceeding, in which
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2322A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2322A1.txt
  • quality reception inside of trade show venues, due to signal blockage from walls and ceilings. INFORMATIVE S2651 SAT-MOD-20061109-00137 New ICO Satellite Services G.P. The application captioned above was accepted for filing in a separate public notice today. As it pertains to a licensing proceeding, it is generally restricted under the Commission's ex parte rules. See 47 C.F.R. �� 1.1202(d) and 1.1208. On November 14, 2006, Inmarsat Global Limited filed a request to designate the proceeding as "permit-but-disclose" under the Commission's rules governing ex parte communications. See Motion to Designate Proceeding as Permit-But-Disclose, filed by Inmarsat Global Limited (November 14, 2006). No oppositions to the change in status have been filed. The issue raised in this application addresses complex technical, legal, and
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2329A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2329A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2329A1.txt
  • than Petitioners in CG Docket No. 06-181. We note that all petitions and related pleadings are available electronically, under docket number CG Docket No. 06-181, on the Commission's ECFS web site. Ex Parte Presentations. Unless otherwise provided, requests for waiver of the Commission's rules are subject to treatment by the Commission as restricted proceedings for ex parte purposes under section 1.1208 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.1208. Because of the policy implications and potential impact of the collective proceedings in CG Docket No. 06-181 on persons not necessarily party to each individual petition for exemption, we believe it would be in the public interest to treat CG Docket No. 06-181 as a permit-but-disclose proceeding under the Commission's ex parte
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2383A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2383A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2383A1.txt
  • its participation in the competitive bidding process, it may be subject to forfeiture of its upfront payment, down payment, or full bid amount, and may be prohibited from participating in future auctions. Ex Parte Rule: Applicants should also be aware that the Commission has generally exempted auction proceedings from the strict requirements of the ex parte rule found in Section 1.1208 of the Commission's rules. Mock Auction: All applicants found to be qualified bidders will be eligible to participate in a mock auction on Monday, January 8, 2007. We encourage all qualified bidders to take advantage of this opportunity to become familiar with the FCC's Integrated Spectrum Auction System (``FCC Auction System'' or ``ISAS''). In the public notice announcing the qualified
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2529A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2529A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2529A1.txt
  • phone at (202) 488-5300 or (800) 378-3160, or by facsimile at (202) 488-5563. For further information regarding the public reference file for this waiver request, contact Maria Ringold, Chief, Wireless Branch, RIC, (202) 418-1355. Unless otherwise provided, requests for waiver of the Commission's Rules are subject to treatment by the Commission as restricted proceedings for ex parte purposes under Section 1.1208 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.1208. Because of the policy implications and potential impact of this proceeding on persons not parties to the waiver request, we believe it would be in the public interest to treat this case as a permit-but-disclose proceeding under the ex parte rules. See Sections 1.1200(a), 1.1206 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. ��
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2575A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2575A1.txt
  • to SES Americom to prepare and file the required documents, and that no other party would be adversely affected by the grant of additional time. SAT-STA-20061107-00131 Sirius Satellite Radio Inc. The application captioned above is an application for authority under Title III of the Communications Act and is generally restricted under the Commission's ex parte rules. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.1208. In order to develop a full and complete record in this proceeding, the Bureau concludes that the public interest will be served by designating this proceeding as "permit-but-disclose" for purposes of the Commission's rules governing ex parte communications. 47 C.F.R. �� 1.1200(a) and 1.1206. This action is without prejudice to any determination regarding the processing of the application. SAT-STA-20061114-00138 XM
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2589A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2589A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2589A1.txt
  • least in part, on determinations made in the Qualcomm Order. Applications for authority under Title III of the Communications Act are ``restricted'' under the ex parte rules. Each of the 12 applications is thus far uncontested, however, and Qualcomm therefore could make presentations to staff without having to serve or notice any third party consistent with Note 1 to Section 1.1208. WT Docket 05-7 and the 12 applications have technical, legal, and policy issues in common, yet are currently subject to divergent disclosure requirements under the Commission's ex parte rules. We seek to reduce possible confusion and ensure that consistent and transparent ex parte rules apply in these proceedings. We find that the public interest would be served by modifying the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2617A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2617A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2617A1.txt
  • phone at (202) 488-5300 or (800) 378-3160, or by facsimile at (202) 488-5563. For further information regarding the public reference file for this waiver request, contact Maria Ringold, Chief, Wireless Branch, RIC, (202) 418-1355. Unless otherwise provided, requests for waiver of the Commission's Rules are subject to treatment by the Commission as restricted proceedings for ex parte purposes under Section 1.1208 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.1208. Because of the policy implications and potential impact of this proceeding on persons not parties to the waiver request, we believe it would be in the public interest to treat this case as a permit-but-disclose proceeding under the ex parte rules. See Sections 1.1200(a), 1.1206 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. ��
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-281A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-281A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-281A1.txt
  • its participation in the competitive bidding process, it may be subject to forfeiture of its upfront payment, down payment, or full bid amount and may be prohibited from participating in future auctions. Ex Parte Rule: Applicants should also be aware that the Commission has generally exempted auction proceedings from the strict requirements of the ex parte rule found in Section 1.1208 of the Commission's rules. Mock Auction: All applicants found to be qualified bidders will be eligible to participate in a mock auction on Monday, March 13, 2006. We encourage all qualified bidders to take advantage of this mock auction to become familiar with the FCC's Integrated Spectrum Auction System (``FCC Auction System'' or ``ISAS''). In the public notice announcing the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-608A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-608A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-608A1.txt
  • filed July 11, 2005, for an extension of time in which to file its opposition. 47 C.F.R. �� 1.1200-16. See File No. BNPFT-20030829AUC (application accepted for filing April 28, 2004). See Public Notice, Report No. 45939 (Mar. 11, 2005) at 20. See File No. BNPFT-20030829AUC. See Public Notice, Report No. 45999 (Jun. 6, 2005) at 29. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.1208. Complaint at 3. Complaint at 2. Complaint at 4. Complaint at 3. Saga's complaint was denied by DA 05-2292 (Aug. 18, 2005). Opposition at 1. Opposition at 2. Opposition at 3. Id. Reply at 2. Id. Id. See Association for Community Education, Inc., supra. Federal Communication Commissions DA 06-608 Federal Communications Commission DA 06-608 hh9 > ? @ A R
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-701A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-701A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-701A1.txt
  • its participation in the competitive bidding process, it may be subject to forfeiture of its upfront payment, down payment, or full bid amount and may be prohibited from participating in future auctions. Ex Parte Rule: Applicants should also be aware that the Commission has generally exempted auction proceedings from the strict requirements of the ex parte rule found in Section 1.1208 of the Commission's rules. Mock Auction: All applicants found to be qualified bidders will be eligible to participate in a mock auction on Monday, May 8, 2006. We encourage all qualified bidders to take advantage of this opportunity to become familiar with the FCC's Integrated Spectrum Auction System (``FCC Auction System'' or ``ISAS''). In the public notice announcing the qualified
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-800A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-800A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-800A1.txt
  • No. 26195) announcing that the applications had been accepted for filing and establishing a pleading cycle to permit interested parties an opportunity to comment on the proposed transaction. Applications for consent to the transfer of control of broadcast licenses and authorizations are subject, unless otherwise provided, to treatment by the Commission as restricted proceedings for ex parte purposes under Section 1.1208 of the Commission's rules. 47 C.F.R. �1.1208. We have concluded, however, that classifying this proceeding as permit-but-disclose would, in this case, serve the public interest. Accordingly, by this Public Notice, and pursuant to Section 1.1200(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �1.1200(a), we announce that the ex parte procedures applicable to nonrestricted proceedings will govern our consideration of the instant
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-808A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-808A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-808A1.txt
  • 12th Street, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20554. All filings must be addressed to the Commission's Secretary, Marlene H. Dortch, Office of the Secretary, Federal Communications Commission, 445 12th Street, SW, Room TW-B204, Washington, DC 20554. Unless otherwise provided, requests for waiver of the Commission's rules are subject to treatment by the Commission as restricted proceedings for ex parte purposes under section 1.1208 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.1208. Because of the potential impact of this proceeding on persons not parties to the Petition, this proceeding shall be treated as a permit-but-disclose proceeding under the ex parte rules, which are codified at 47 C.F.R. �� 1.1200(a), 1.1206. Therefore, ex parte presentations will be allowed but must be disclosed in accordance with
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-859A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-859A1.txt
  • the 138.5 W.L. orbit location for a period of 60 days commencing on February 8, 2006. INFORMATIVE S2651 SAT-AMD-20050927-00186 ICO Satellite Services G.P. See File No. SAT-MOD-20050926-00182 , (Call Sign S2651). S2651 SAT-MOD-20050926-00182 ICO Satellite Services G.P. These applications pertain to a licensing proceeding and are generally restricted under the Commission's ex parte rules. See 47 C.F.R. �� 1.1202(d) and 1.1208. On April 2, 2006, ICO Satellite Services G.P. filed a request to designate this proceeding as "permit-but-disclose" under the Commission's ex parte rules. See Letter to Marlene H. Dortch, Secretary, Federal Communications Commission, from Suzanne Hutchings Malloy, Counsel to ICO Satellite Services G.P. (April 2, 2006). No oppositions to the change in status have been filed. See Letter to Marlene
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-92A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-92A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-92A1.txt
  • C.F.R. � 1.1210. See Petition at 4; see also Exhibit B to Petition, Letter from [Congressman] Virgil H. Goode, Jr. to Ms. Diane Atkinson, Congressional Liaison Specialist, Federal Communications Commission (Mar. 9, 2004). See Exhibit B to Petition. Letter from Joel Kaufman, Deputy Associate, General Counsel to the Honorable Virgil H. Goode, Jr. (Mar. 31, 2004). See 47 C.F.R. � 1.1208 (prohibiting ex parte presentations in restricted proceedings). See Petition at 3-5. See Petition at 5-7. See Petition at 6. See Petition at 7. See Petition at 7-8. Opposition at 2. See Opposition at 2-3. See Opposition at 3. See Opposition at 3-4. Section 1.1208 prohibits ex parte communications in restricted proceedings to ``decision-making personnel.'' See Opposition at 4-5. See Opposition
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-962A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-962A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-962A1.txt
  • phone at (202) 488-5300 or (800) 378-3160, or by facsimile at (202) 488-5563. For further information regarding the public reference file for this waiver request, contact Maria Ringold, Chief, Wireless Branch, RIC, (202) 418-1355. Unless otherwise provided, requests for waiver of the Commission's Rules are subject to treatment by the Commission as restricted proceedings for ex parte purposes under Section 1.1208 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.1208. Because of the policy implications and potential impact of this proceeding on persons not parties to the waiver request, we believe it would be in the public interest to treat this case as a permit-but-disclose proceeding under the ex parte rules. See Sections 1.1200(a), 1.1206 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. ��
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-964A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-964A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-964A1.txt
  • phone at (202) 488-5300 or (800) 378-3160, or by facsimile at (202) 488-5563. For further information regarding the public reference file for this waiver request, contact Maria Ringold, Chief, Wireless Branch, RIC, (202) 418-1355. Unless otherwise provided, requests for waiver of the Commission's Rules are subject to treatment by the Commission as restricted proceedings for ex parte purposes under Section 1.1208 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.1208. Because of the policy implications and potential impact of this proceeding on persons not parties to the waiver request, we believe it would be in the public interest to treat this case as a permit-but-disclose proceeding under the ex parte rules. See Sections 1.1200(a), 1.1206 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. ��
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-968A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-968A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-968A1.txt
  • phone at (202) 488-5300 or (800) 378-3160, or by facsimile at (202) 488-5563. For further information regarding the public reference file for this waiver request, contact Maria Ringold, Chief, Wireless Branch, RIC, (202) 418-1355. Unless otherwise provided, requests for waiver of the Commission's Rules are subject to treatment by the Commission as restricted proceedings for ex parte purposes under Section 1.1208 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.1208. Because of the policy implications and potential impact of this proceeding on persons not parties to the waiver request, we believe it would be in the public interest to treat this case as a permit-but-disclose proceeding under the ex parte rules. See Sections 1.1200(a), 1.1206 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. ��
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-102A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-102A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-102A1.txt
  • handset is deemed hearing aid-compatible if it receives, for inductive coupling, at least a U3T rating as set forth in ANSI standard document C63.19. Petitioners seeking an extension of this deadline are listed in Appendix C. Under the Commission's rules, these petitions for waiver are subject to treatment by the Commission as restricted proceedings for ex parte purposes under � 1.1208 of the Commission's rules, unless otherwise provided. Because these petitions implicate broadly applicable policy issues, we find, pursuant to Note 2 to � 1.1208 and consistent with � 1.1200(a), that these petitions should be treated as permit-but-disclose proceedings under the ex parte rules. Therefore, the petitions listed in Appendices A, B, and C will hereinafter be subject to the provisions
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-120A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-120A1.txt
  • of the Commission's rules governing ex parte communications. See Motion to Designate Proceeding as "Permit-But-Disclose," filed on December 20, 2006. We find that designating the application as "permit-but-disclose" will facilitate resolution of the complex policy issues raised by the application. Thus, we designate IBFS File No. SAT-MOD-20061206-00144 as "permit-but-disclose," effective January 18, 2007. See 47 C.F.R. �� 1.1200(a), 1.1206 and 1.1208 note 2. This action is without prejudice to any determination regarding the processing of the application. Page 3 of 3
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1603A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1603A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1603A1.txt
  • its participation in the competitive bidding process, it may be subject to forfeiture of its upfront payment, down payment, or full bid amount, and may be prohibited from participating in future auctions. Ex Parte Rule: Applicants should also be aware that the Commission has generally exempted auction proceedings from the strict requirements of the ex parte rule found in Section 1.1208 of the Commission's rules. Mock Auction: All applicants found to be qualified bidders will be eligible to participate in a mock auction on Monday, May 14, 2007. The Bureau encourages all qualified bidders to take advantage of this opportunity to become familiar with the FCC's Integrated Spectrum Auction System (``FCC Auction System'' or ``ISAS''). In the public notice announcing the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1651A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1651A1.txt
  • SAT-STA-20070222-00036 XM Radio Inc. The application captioned above was accepted for filing in a separate public notice today. See Public Notice, Space Station Applications Accepted for Filing (Report No. SAT-00434, released April 06, 2007). As an application for authority under Title III of the Communications Act, it is generally restricted under the Commission's ex parte rules. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.1208. In order to develop a full and complete record in this proceeding, the Bureau concludes that the public interest will be served by designating this proceeding as "permit-but-disclose" for purposes of the Commission's rules governing ex parte communications. 47 C.F.R. �� 1.1200(a) and 1.1206. This action is without prejudice to any determination regarding the processing of the application. Page 1
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1708A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1708A1.txt
  • SAT-STA-20070330-00059 XM Radio Inc. The application captioned above was accepted for filing in a separate public notice today. See Public Notice, Space Station Applications Accepted for Filing (Report No. SAT-00437, released April 13, 2007). As an application for authority under Title III of the Communications Act, it is generally restricted under the Commission's ex parte rules. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.1208. In order to develop a full and complete record in this proceeding, the Bureau concludes that the public interest will be served by designating this proceeding as "permit-but-disclose" for purposes of the Commission's rules governing ex parte communications. 47 C.F.R. �� 1.1200(a) and 1.1206. This action is without prejudice to any determination regarding the processing of the application. Page 1
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-190A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-190A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-190A1.txt
  • its participation in the competitive bidding process, it may be subject to forfeiture of its upfront payment, down payment, or full bid amount, and may be prohibited from participating in future auctions. Ex Parte Rule: Applicants should also be aware that the Commission has generally exempted auction proceedings from the strict requirements of the ex parte rule found in Section 1.1208 of the Commission's rules. Mock Auction: All applicants found to be qualified bidders will be eligible to participate in a mock auction on Monday, March 5, 2007. We encourage all qualified bidders to take advantage of this opportunity to become familiar with the FCC's Integrated Spectrum Auction System (``ISAS'' or ``FCC Auction System''). In the public notice announcing the qualified
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1947A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1947A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1947A1.txt
  • interested parties an opportunity to comment on the proposed transaction. The petition-to-deny period for these applications ends at close of business on June 11, 2007. 47 C.F.R. �73.3584(a). Applications for consent to the transfer of control of broadcast licenses and authorizations are subject, unless otherwise provided, to treatment by the Commission as restricted proceedings for ex parte purposes under Section 1.1208 of the Commission's rules. 47 C.F.R. �1.1208. We have concluded, however, that classifying this proceeding as permit-but-disclose would, in this case, permit broader public participation and thereby serve the public interest. Accordingly, by this Public Notice, and pursuant to Section 1.1200(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �1.1200(a), we announce that the ex parte procedures applicable to permit-but-disclose proceedings will
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1952A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1952A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1952A1.txt
  • pursuant to the authority delegated under 47 C.F.R. � 0.283, that the Petition for Relief and Sanctions filed October 20, 2005, by R B Schools IS GRANTED in part and DENIED in part, and all related pleadings ARE DISMISSED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Millikin University IS HEREBY ADMONISHED for its apparent willful and repeated violations of 47 C.F.R. �� 1.1208 and 1.1210. We caution Millikin University to be and remain more diligent in the future regarding compliance with the Rules. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that that the application (File No. BNPED-20041101AHW) of R B Schools for a construction permit for a new time-sharing NCE-FM station at Decatur, Illinois, IS DISMISSED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that that the application (File No.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1966A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1966A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1966A1.txt
  • its participation in the competitive bidding process, it may be subject to forfeiture of its upfront payment, down payment, or full bid amount, and may be prohibited from participating in future auctions. Ex Parte Rule: Applicants should also be aware that the Commission has generally exempted auction proceedings from the strict requirements of the ex parte rule found in Section 1.1208 of the Commission's rules. Mock Auction: All applicants found to be qualified bidders will be eligible to participate in a mock auction on Monday, June 18, 2007. The Bureau encourages all qualified bidders to take advantage of this opportunity to become familiar with the FCC's Integrated Spectrum Auction System (``ISAS'' or ``FCC Auction System''). In the public notice announcing the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2124A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2124A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2124A1.txt
  • pleading cycle to permit interested parties an opportunity to comment on the proposed transaction. The petition-to-deny period for these applications ends at close of business on June 8, 2007. 47 C.F.R. �73.3584(a). Applications for consent to assign broadcast licenses and authorizations are subject, unless otherwise provided, to treatment by the Commission as restricted proceedings for ex parte purposes under Section 1.1208 of the Commission's rules. 47 C.F.R. �1.1208. We have concluded, however, that classifying this proceeding as permit-but-disclose would, in this case, serve the public interest. Accordingly, by this Public Notice, and pursuant to Section 1.1200(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �1.1200(a), we announce that the ex parte procedures applicable to nonrestricted proceedings will govern our consideration of the instant
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2168A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2168A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2168A1.txt
  • phone at (202) 488-5300 or (800) 378-3160, or by facsimile at (202) 488-5563. For further information regarding the public reference file for this waiver request, contact Maria Ringold, Chief, Wireless Branch, RIC, (202) 418-1355. Unless otherwise provided, requests for waiver of the Commission's Rules are subject to treatment by the Commission as restricted proceedings for ex parte purposes under Section 1.1208 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.1208. Because of the policy implications and potential impact of this proceeding on persons not parties to the waiver request, we believe it would be in the public interest to treat this case as a permit-but-disclose proceeding under the ex parte rules. See Sections 1.1200(a), 1.1206 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. ��
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2169A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2169A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2169A1.txt
  • phone at (202) 488-5300 or (800) 378-3160, or by facsimile at (202) 488-5563. For further information regarding the public reference file for this waiver request, contact Maria Ringold, Chief, Wireless Branch, RIC, (202) 418-1355. Unless otherwise provided, requests for waiver of the Commission's Rules are subject to treatment by the Commission as restricted proceedings for ex parte purposes under Section 1.1208 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.1208. Because of the policy implications and potential impact of this proceeding on persons not parties to the waiver request, we believe it would be in the public interest to treat this case as a permit-but-disclose proceeding under the ex parte rules. See Sections 1.1200(a), 1.1206 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. ��
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2170A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2170A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2170A1.txt
  • phone at (202) 488-5300 or (800) 378-3160, or by facsimile at (202) 488-5563. For further information regarding the public reference file for this waiver request, contact Maria Ringold, Chief, Wireless Branch, RIC, (202) 418-1355. Unless otherwise provided, requests for waiver of the Commission's Rules are subject to treatment by the Commission as restricted proceedings for ex parte purposes under Section 1.1208 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.1208. Because of the policy implications and potential impact of this proceeding on persons not parties to the waiver request, we believe it would be in the public interest to treat this case as a permit-but-disclose proceeding under the ex parte rules. See Sections 1.1200(a), 1.1206 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. ��
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2171A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2171A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2171A1.txt
  • phone at (202) 488-5300 or (800) 378-3160, or by facsimile at (202) 488-5563. For further information regarding the public reference file for this waiver request, contact Maria Ringold, Chief, Wireless Branch, RIC, (202) 418-1355. Unless otherwise provided, requests for waiver of the Commission's Rules are subject to treatment by the Commission as restricted proceedings for ex parte purposes under Section 1.1208 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.1208. Because of the policy implications and potential impact of this proceeding on persons not parties to the waiver request, we believe it would be in the public interest to treat this case as a permit-but-disclose proceeding under the ex parte rules. See Sections 1.1200(a), 1.1206 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. ��
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2172A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2172A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2172A1.txt
  • phone at (202) 488-5300 or (800) 378-3160, or by facsimile at (202) 488-5563. For further information regarding the public reference file for this waiver request, contact Maria Ringold, Chief, Wireless Branch, RIC, (202) 418-1355. Unless otherwise provided, requests for waiver of the Commission's Rules are subject to treatment by the Commission as restricted proceedings for ex parte purposes under Section 1.1208 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.1208. Because of the policy implications and potential impact of this proceeding on persons not parties to the waiver request, we believe it would be in the public interest to treat this case as a permit-but-disclose proceeding under the ex parte rules. See Sections 1.1200(a), 1.1206 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. ��
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2173A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2173A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2173A1.txt
  • phone at (202) 488-5300 or (800) 378-3160, or by facsimile at (202) 488-5563. For further information regarding the public reference file for this waiver request, contact Maria Ringold, Chief, Wireless Branch, RIC, (202) 418-1355. Unless otherwise provided, requests for waiver of the Commission's Rules are subject to treatment by the Commission as restricted proceedings for ex parte purposes under Section 1.1208 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.1208. Because of the policy implications and potential impact of this proceeding on persons not parties to the waiver request, we believe it would be in the public interest to treat this case as a permit-but-disclose proceeding under the ex parte rules. See Sections 1.1200(a), 1.1206 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. ��
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2174A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2174A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2174A1.txt
  • phone at (202) 488-5300 or (800) 378-3160, or by facsimile at (202) 488-5563. For further information regarding the public reference file for this waiver request, contact Maria Ringold, Chief, Wireless Branch, RIC, (202) 418-1355. Unless otherwise provided, requests for waiver of the Commission's Rules are subject to treatment by the Commission as restricted proceedings for ex parte purposes under Section 1.1208 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.1208. Because of the policy implications and potential impact of this proceeding on persons not parties to the waiver request, we believe it would be in the public interest to treat this case as a permit-but-disclose proceeding under the ex parte rules. See Sections 1.1200(a), 1.1206 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. ��
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2186A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2186A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2186A1.txt
  • phone at (202) 488-5300 or (800) 378-3160, or by facsimile at (202) 488-5563. For further information regarding the public reference file for this waiver request, contact Maria Ringold, Chief, Wireless Branch, RIC, (202) 418-1355. Unless otherwise provided, requests for waiver of the Commission's Rules are subject to treatment by the Commission as restricted proceedings for ex parte purposes under Section 1.1208 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.1208. Because of the policy implications and potential impact of this proceeding on persons not parties to the waiver request, we believe it would be in the public interest to treat this case as a permit-but-disclose proceeding under the ex parte rules. See Sections 1.1200(a), 1.1206 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. ��
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2187A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2187A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2187A1.txt
  • phone at (202) 488-5300 or (800) 378-3160, or by facsimile at (202) 488-5563. For further information regarding the public reference file for this waiver request, contact Maria Ringold, Chief, Wireless Branch, RIC, (202) 418-1355. Unless otherwise provided, requests for waiver of the Commission's Rules are subject to treatment by the Commission as restricted proceedings for ex parte purposes under Section 1.1208 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.1208. Because of the policy implications and potential impact of this proceeding on persons not parties to the waiver request, we believe it would be in the public interest to treat this case as a permit-but-disclose proceeding under the ex parte rules. See Sections 1.1200(a), 1.1206 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. ��
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2188A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2188A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2188A1.txt
  • phone at (202) 488-5300 or (800) 378-3160, or by facsimile at (202) 488-5563. For further information regarding the public reference file for this waiver request, contact Maria Ringold, Chief, Wireless Branch, RIC, (202) 418-1355. Unless otherwise provided, requests for waiver of the Commission's Rules are subject to treatment by the Commission as restricted proceedings for ex parte purposes under Section 1.1208 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.1208. Because of the policy implications and potential impact of this proceeding on persons not parties to the waiver request, we believe it would be in the public interest to treat this case as a permit-but-disclose proceeding under the ex parte rules. See Sections 1.1200(a), 1.1206 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. ��
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2189A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2189A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2189A1.txt
  • phone at (202) 488-5300 or (800) 378-3160, or by facsimile at (202) 488-5563. For further information regarding the public reference file for this waiver request, contact Maria Ringold, Chief, Wireless Branch, RIC, (202) 418-1355. Unless otherwise provided, requests for waiver of the Commission's Rules are subject to treatment by the Commission as restricted proceedings for ex parte purposes under Section 1.1208 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.1208. Because of the policy implications and potential impact of this proceeding on persons not parties to the waiver request, we believe it would be in the public interest to treat this case as a permit-but-disclose proceeding under the ex parte rules. See Sections 1.1200(a), 1.1206 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. ��
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2192A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2192A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2192A1.txt
  • phone at (202) 488-5300 or (800) 378-3160, or by facsimile at (202) 488-5563. For further information regarding the public reference file for this waiver request, contact Maria Ringold, Chief, Wireless Branch, RIC, (202) 418-1355. Unless otherwise provided, requests for waiver of the Commission's Rules are subject to treatment by the Commission as restricted proceedings for ex parte purposes under Section 1.1208 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.1208. Because of the policy implications and potential impact of this proceeding on persons not parties to the waiver request, we believe it would be in the public interest to treat this case as a permit-but-disclose proceeding under the ex parte rules. See Sections 1.1200(a), 1.1206 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. ��
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2193A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2193A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2193A1.txt
  • phone at (202) 488-5300 or (800) 378-3160, or by facsimile at (202) 488-5563. For further information regarding the public reference file for this waiver request, contact Maria Ringold, Chief, Wireless Branch, RIC, (202) 418-1355. Unless otherwise provided, requests for waiver of the Commission's Rules are subject to treatment by the Commission as restricted proceedings for ex parte purposes under Section 1.1208 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.1208. Because of the policy implications and potential impact of this proceeding on persons not parties to the waiver request, we believe it would be in the public interest to treat this case as a permit-but-disclose proceeding under the ex parte rules. See Sections 1.1200(a), 1.1206 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. ��
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2344A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2344A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2344A1.txt
  • from the date of this public notice. Replies to these comments and oppositions are due 20 days after the comments/oppositions deadline. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.4 for particulars regarding filing deadlines. Ex Parte Presentations. Unless otherwise provided, requests for waiver of the Commission's rules are subject to treatment by the Commission as restricted proceedings for ex parte purposes under section 1.1208 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.1208. Because of the policy implications and potential impact of the collective proceedings in CG Docket No. 06-181 on persons not necessarily party to each individual petition for exemption, we have found that it would be in the public interest to treat CG Docket No. 06-181 as a permit-but-disclose proceeding under the Commission's
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2652A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2652A1.txt
  • June 20, 2007, at Sirius' 2007 National Sales Meeting in Plainsboro, New Jersey, with the technical parameters and at the location specified in its application, subject to conditions. INFORMATIVE S2242 SAT-LOA-19970605-00049 DIRECTV ENTERPRISES, INC. The above-captioned application seeks authority under Title III of the Communications Act and is generally restricted under the Commission's ex parte rules. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.1208. In order to develop a full and complete record in this proceeding, the Bureau concludes that the public interest will be served by designating this proceeding as "permit-but-disclose" for purposes of the Commission's rules governing ex parte communications. 47 C.F.R. �� 1.1200(a) and 1.1206. This action is without prejudice to any action on this application. S2243 SAT-LOA-19970605-00050 DIRECTV ENTERPRISES, INC.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2684A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2684A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2684A1.txt
  • the applications themselves, separately. See FCC Announces a New Filing Location for Paper Documents and a New Fax Number for General Correspondence, Public Notice, 16 FCC Rcd 22165 (2001). See Sections 1.1200(a), 1.1206 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.1200(a), 1.1206. Parties are reminded that WSI's pending Part 101 applications are restricted proceedings for ex parte purposes under Section 1.1208 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.1208. PUBLIC NOTICE Federal Communications Commission 445 12th St., S.W. Washington, D.C. 20554 News Media Information 202 / 418-0500 Internet: http://www.fcc.gov TTY: 1-888-835-5322 * / [ l m n � ' `` '' hb hb ��PNG r v ��"r�9 I'6� �d�Y�͆aX ���; Wh� �X,�aX���y�]\\.W`h���va6l! �v"]�V�at�������-``````�"m(c)x<��G�<���={-N��J%t�<== �"""x ҍ� � ��(c)���!��'' �R)&� �A�� "���\��v`` �
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2760A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2760A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2760A1.txt
  • the Assignment Applications ended at close of business on June 18, 2007, and the petition-to-deny period for the Trust Application ends at close of business on July 5, 2007. 47 C.F.R. �73.3584(a). Applications for consent to assign broadcast licenses and authorizations are subject, unless otherwise provided, to treatment by the Commission as restricted proceedings for ex parte purposes under Section 1.1208 of the Commission's rules. 47 C.F.R. �1.1208. We have concluded, however, that classifying this proceeding as permit-but-disclose would, in this case, serve the public interest. Accordingly, by this Public Notice, and pursuant to Section 1.1200(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �1.1200(a), we announce that the ex parte procedures applicable to nonrestricted proceedings will govern our consideration of the instant
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-276A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-276A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-276A1.txt
  • from the date of this public notice. Replies to these comments and oppositions are due 20 days after the comments/oppositions deadline. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.4 for particulars regarding filing deadlines. Ex Parte Presentations. Unless otherwise provided, requests for waiver of the Commission's rules are subject to treatment by the Commission as restricted proceedings for ex parte purposes under section 1.1208 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.1208. Because of the policy implications and potential impact of the collective proceedings in CG Docket No. 06-181 on persons not necessarily party to each individual petition for exemption, we have found that it would be in the public interest to treat CG Docket No. 06-181 as a permit-but-disclose proceeding under the Commission's
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-289A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-289A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-289A1.txt
  • phone at (202) 488-5300 or (800) 378-3160, or by facsimile at (202) 488-5563. For further information regarding the public reference file for this waiver request, contact Maria Ringold, Chief, Wireless Branch, RIC, (202) 418-1355. Unless otherwise provided, requests for waiver of the Commission's Rules are subject to treatment by the Commission as restricted proceedings for ex parte purposes under Section 1.1208 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.1208. Because of the policy implications and potential impact of this proceeding on persons not parties to the waiver request, we believe it would be in the public interest to treat this case as a permit-but-disclose proceeding under the ex parte rules. See Sections 1.1200(a), 1.1206 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. ��
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2A1.txt
  • its participation in the competitive bidding process, it may be subject to forfeiture of its upfront payment, down payment, or full bid amount, and may be prohibited from participating in future auctions. Ex Parte Rule: Applicants should also be aware that the Commission has generally exempted auction proceedings from the strict requirements of the ex parte rule found in Section 1.1208 of the Commission's rules. Mock Auction: All applicants found to be qualified bidders will be eligible to participate in a mock auction on Monday, February 5, 2007. The Bureau encourages all qualified bidders to take advantage of this opportunity to become familiar with the FCC's Integrated Spectrum Auction System (``FCC Auction System'' or ``ISAS''). In the public notice announcing the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3145A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3145A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3145A1.txt
  • to permit interested parties an opportunity to comment on the proposed transaction. The petition-to-deny period for these applications ended at close of business on June 18, 2007. 47 C.F.R. �73.3584(a). Applications for consent to transfer control of broadcast licenses and authorizations are subject, unless otherwise provided, to treatment by the Commission as restricted proceedings for ex parte purposes under Section 1.1208 of the Commission's rules. 47 C.F.R. �1.1208. We have concluded, however, that classifying this proceeding as permit-but-disclose would, in this case, permit broader public participation and thereby serve the public interest. Accordingly, by this Public Notice, and pursuant to Section 1.1200(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �1.1200(a), we announce that the ex parte procedures applicable to nonrestricted proceedings will
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3359A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3359A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3359A1.txt
  • from the date of this public notice. Replies to these comments and oppositions are due 20 days after the comments/oppositions deadline. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.4 for particulars regarding filing deadlines. Ex Parte Presentations. Unless otherwise provided, requests for waiver of the Commission's rules are subject to treatment by the Commission as restricted proceedings for ex parte purposes under section 1.1208 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.1208. Because of the policy implications and potential impact of the collective proceedings in CG Docket No. 06-181 on persons not necessarily party to each individual petition for exemption, we have found that it would be in the public interest to treat CG Docket No. 06-181 as a permit-but-disclose proceeding under the Commission's
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3405A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3405A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3405A1.txt
  • Cohen on June 7, 2006. See BLTTL-20060607 AAR. WCIU-TV Limited Partnership, the licensee of WCIU-TV, Chicago, Illinois, filed an opposition with respect to that license application. Commission action on the license application is not final. Applications for a broadcast station license are subject, unless otherwise provided, to treatment by the Commission as restricted proceedings for ex parte purposes under Section 1.1208 of the Commission's rules. See 47 C.F.R. � 1. 1208. We have concluded, however, that classifying this proceeding as permit-but-disclose would, in this case, serve the public interest. Accordingly, by this Public Notice, and pursuant to Section 1.1200(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �1.1200(a), we announce that the ex parte procedures applicable to permit-but-disclose proceedings will govern our consideration
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3950A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3950A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3950A1.txt
  • from the date of this public notice. Replies to these comments and oppositions are due 20 days after the comments/oppositions deadline. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.4 for particulars regarding filing deadlines. Ex Parte Presentations. Unless otherwise provided, requests for waiver of the Commission's rules are subject to treatment by the Commission as restricted proceedings for ex parte purposes under section 1.1208 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.1208. Because of the policy implications and potential impact of the collective proceedings in CG Docket No. 06-181 on persons not necessarily party to each individual petition for exemption, we have found that it is in the public interest to treat CG Docket No. 06-181 as a permit-but-disclose proceeding under the Commission's ex
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4150A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4150A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4150A1.txt
  • from the date of this public notice. Replies to these comments and oppositions are due 20 days after the comments/oppositions deadline. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.4 for particulars regarding filing deadlines. Ex Parte Presentations. Unless otherwise provided, requests for waiver of the Commission's rules are subject to treatment by the Commission as restricted proceedings for ex parte purposes under section 1.1208 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.1208. Because of the policy implications and potential impact of the collective proceedings in CG Docket No. 06-181 on persons not necessarily party to each individual petition for exemption, we have found that it is in the public interest to treat CG Docket No. 06-181 as a permit-but-disclose proceeding under the Commission's ex
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4393A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4393A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4393A1.txt
  • from the date of this public notice. Replies to these comments and oppositions are due 20 days after the comments/oppositions deadline. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.4 for particulars regarding filing deadlines. Ex Parte Presentations. Unless otherwise provided, requests for waiver of the Commission's rules are subject to treatment by the Commission as restricted proceedings for ex parte purposes under section 1.1208 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.1208. Because of the policy implications and potential impact of the collective proceedings in CG Docket No. 06-181 on persons not necessarily party to each individual petition for exemption, we have found that it is in the public interest to treat CG Docket No. 06-181 as a permit-but-disclose proceeding under the Commission's ex
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4575A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4575A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4575A1.txt
  • in accessible formats for people with disabilities (Braille, large print, electronic files, audio format), send an e-mail to fcc504@fcc.gov or call the Consumer & Governmental Affairs Bureau at (202) 418-0530 (voice), (202) 418-0432 (TTY). Unless otherwise provided, requests for waiver of the Commission's Rules are subject to treatment by the Commission as restricted proceedings for ex parte purposes under Section 1.1208 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.1208. Because of the policy implications and potential impact of this proceeding on persons not parties to the waiver request, we believe it would be in the public interest to treat this case as a permit-but-disclose proceeding under the ex parte rules. See Sections 1.1200(a), 1.1206 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. ��
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4884A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4884A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4884A1.txt
  • from the date of this public notice. Replies to these comments and oppositions are due 20 days after the comments/oppositions deadline. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.4 for particulars regarding filing deadlines. Ex Parte Presentations. Unless otherwise provided, requests for waiver of the Commission's rules are subject to treatment by the Commission as restricted proceedings for ex parte purposes under section 1.1208 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.1208. Because of the policy implications and potential impact of the collective proceedings in CG Docket No. 06-181 on persons not necessarily party to each individual petition for exemption, we have found that it is in the public interest to treat CG Docket No. 06-181 as a permit-but-disclose proceeding under the Commission's ex
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-493A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-493A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-493A1.txt
  • from the date of this public notice. Replies to these comments and oppositions are due 20 days after the comments/oppositions deadline. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.4 for particulars regarding filing deadlines. Ex Parte Presentations. Unless otherwise provided, requests for waiver of the Commission's rules are subject to treatment by the Commission as restricted proceedings for ex parte purposes under section 1.1208 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.1208. Because of the policy implications and potential impact of the collective proceedings in CG Docket No. 06-181 on persons not necessarily party to each individual petition for exemption, we have found that it would be in the public interest to treat CG Docket No. 06-181 as a permit-but-disclose proceeding under the Commission's
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-494A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-494A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-494A1.txt
  • from the date of this public notice. Replies to these comments and oppositions are due 20 days after the comments/oppositions deadline. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.4 for particulars regarding filing deadlines. Ex Parte Presentations. Unless otherwise provided, requests for waiver of the Commission's rules are subject to treatment by the Commission as restricted proceedings for ex parte purposes under section 1.1208 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.1208. Because of the policy implications and potential impact of the collective proceedings in CG Docket No. 06-181 on persons not necessarily party to each individual petition for exemption, we have found that it would be in the public interest to treat CG Docket No. 06-181 as a permit-but-disclose proceeding under the Commission's
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-5030A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-5030A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-5030A1.txt
  • its participation in the competitive bidding process, it may be subject to forfeiture of its upfront payment, down payment, or full bid amount, and may be prohibited from participating in future auctions. Ex Parte Rule: Applicants should also be aware that the Commission has generally exempted auction proceedings from the strict requirements of the ex parte rule found in Section 1.1208 of the Commission's rules. Mock Auction: All applicants found to be qualified bidders will be eligible to participate in a mock auction on Tuesday, January 22, 2008. No separate mock auction will be held for Auction 76. Applicants that are interested in participating in Auction 76 should plan to participate in this mock auction. The Bureau encourages all qualified bidders
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-5050A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-5050A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-5050A1.txt
  • Commission's Secretary, Office of the Secretary, Federal Communications Commission. See FCC Announces a New Filing Location for Paper Documents and a New Fax Number for General Correspondence, Public Notice, 16 FCC Rcd 22165 (2001). Unless otherwise provided, requests for waiver of the Commission's Rules are subject to treatment by the Commission as restricted proceedings for ex parte purposes under Section 1.1208 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.1208. Because of the policy implications and potential impact of this proceeding on persons not parties to the waiver requests, we believe it would be in the public interest to treat this case as a permit-but-disclose proceeding under the ex parte rules. See Sections 1.1200(a), 1.1206 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. ��
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-693A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-693A1.txt
  • to conditions. INFORMATIVE SAT-STA-20061207-00145 Sirius Satellite Radio Inc. The application captioned above was accepted for filing today. See Satellite Policy Branch Information: Satellite Space Station Applications Accepted for Filing, Report SAT-00419, (released February 16, 2007). This application seeks authority under Title III of the Communications Act and is generally restricted under the Commission's ex parte rules. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.1208. In order to develop a full and complete record in this proceeding, the Bureau concludes that the public interest will be served by designating this proceeding as "permit-but-disclose" for purposes of the Commission's rules governing ex parte communications. 47 C.F.R. �� 1.1200(a) and 1.1206. This action is without prejudice to any determination regarding the processing of the application. Page 1
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-812A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-812A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-812A1.txt
  • from the date of this public notice. Replies to these comments and oppositions are due 20 days after the comments/oppositions deadline. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.4 for particulars regarding filing deadlines. Ex Parte Presentations. Unless otherwise provided, requests for waiver of the Commission's rules are subject to treatment by the Commission as restricted proceedings for ex parte purposes under section 1.1208 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.1208. Because of the policy implications and potential impact of the collective proceedings in CG Docket No. 06-181 on persons not necessarily party to each individual petition for exemption, we have found that it would be in the public interest to treat CG Docket No. 06-181 as a permit-but-disclose proceeding under the Commission's
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1027A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1027A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1027A1.txt
  • � 90.155(d). See Waiver Request at 1. Id at 5. Id at 9. Id at 4, 12. Id at 12-13. See Electronic Filing of Documents in Rulemaking Proceedings, 63 FR 24121 (1998). 47 C.F.R. �� 1.1200(a), 1.1206. Requests for waiver of the Commission's Rules are subject to treatment by the Commission as restricted proceedings for ex parte purposes under section 1.1208 of the Commission's rules. 47 C.F.R. � 1.1208. However, because of the policy implications and potential impact of this proceeding on persons not parties to the waiver requests, we find it would be in the public interest to treat this case as a permit-but-disclose proceeding under the ex parte rules. See 47 C.F.R. �� 1.1200(a), 1.1206. 47 C.F.R. � 1.1206(b).
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1040A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1040A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1040A1.txt
  • Forest Conservation Council, and the Friends of the Earth. Presentations made in connection with WT Docket No.08-61 will be subject to the ``permit-but-disclose'' requirements set forth in � 1.1206 of the Commission's ex parte rules. Specifically, under the Commission's rules, the Commission's proceeding on remand is subject to treatment by the Commission as restricted for ex parte purposes under � 1.1208 of the Commission's rules, unless otherwise provided. Because this proceeding implicates broadly applicable policy issues, we find, pursuant to Note 2 to � 1.1208 and consistent with � 1.1200(a), that this proceeding should be treated as permit-but-disclose under the ex parte rules. Ex parte presentations in this proceeding will be allowed but must be disclosed in accordance with the requirements
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1197A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1197A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1197A1.txt
  • its participation in the competitive bidding process, it may be subject to forfeiture of its upfront payment, down payment, or full bid amount, and may be prohibited from participating in future auctions. Ex Parte Rule: Applicants should also be aware that the Commission has generally exempted auction proceedings from the strict requirements of the ex parte rule found in Section 1.1208 of the Commission's rules. Mock Auction: No mock auction will be held for Auction 77. Applicants having questions about conduct of the auction or use of the FCC Auction System are encouraged to contact the appropriate staff listed in paragraph 24 of this Public Notice. Electronic Bidding: Applicants are reminded that qualified bidders are eligible to bid either electronically or
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1217A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1217A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1217A1.txt
  • FOR AN ANCILLARY TERRESTRIAL COMPONENT On May 16, 2008, Globalstar Licensee LLC (Globalstar) filed an application requesting modification of its authorization for operation of Ancillary Terrestrial Component (ATC) facilities in the 1.6/2.4 GHz Mobile-Satellite Service (MSS) spectrum bands. This application is subject, unless otherwise provided, to treatment by the Commission as a restricted proceeding for ex parte purposes under Section 1.1208 of the Commission's rules. 47 C.F.R. � 1.1208. We have concluded, however, that classifying this proceeding as permit-but-disclose would, in this case, serve the public interest. Accordingly, by this Public Notice, and pursuant to Section 1.1200(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.1200(a), we announce that the ex parte procedures applicable to nonrestricted proceedings will govern our consideration of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1579A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1579A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1579A1.txt
  • its participation in the competitive bidding process, it may be subject to forfeiture of its upfront payment, down payment, or full bid amount, and may be prohibited from participating in future auctions. Ex Parte Rule. Applicants should also be aware that the Commission has generally exempted auction proceedings from the strict requirements of the ex parte rule found in Section 1.1208 of the Commission's rules. Mock Auction. All applicants found to be qualified bidders will be eligible to participate in a mock auction on Monday, August 11, 2008. The Bureau encourages all qualified bidders to take advantage of this opportunity to become familiar with the FCC's Integrated Spectrum Auction System (``ISAS'' or ``FCC Auction System''). In the public notice announcing the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1715A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1715A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1715A1.txt
  • from the date of this public notice. Replies to these comments and oppositions are due 20 days after the comments/oppositions deadline. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.4 for particulars regarding filing deadlines. Ex Parte Presentations. Unless otherwise provided, requests for waiver of the Commission's rules are subject to treatment by the Commission as restricted proceedings for ex parte purposes under section 1.1208 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.1208. Because of the policy implications and potential impact of the collective proceedings in CG Docket No. 06-181 on persons not necessarily party to each individual petition for exemption, we have found that it is in the public interest to treat CG Docket No. 06-181 as a permit-but-disclose proceeding under the Commission's ex
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1901A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1901A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1901A1.txt
  • from the date of this public notice. Replies to these comments and oppositions are due 20 days after the comments/oppositions deadline. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.4 for particulars regarding filing deadlines. Ex Parte Presentations. Unless otherwise provided, requests for waiver of the Commission's rules are subject to treatment by the Commission as restricted proceedings for ex parte purposes under section 1.1208 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.1208. Because of the policy implications and potential impact of the collective proceedings in CG Docket No. 06-181 on persons not necessarily party to each individual petition for exemption, we have found that it is in the public interest to treat CG Docket No. 06-181 as a permit-but-disclose proceeding under the Commission's ex
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1924A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1924A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1924A1.txt
  • and Priority Mail) must be sent to 9300 East Hampton Drive, Capitol Heights, MD 20743. U.S. Postal Service first-class, Express, and Priority mail must be addressed to 445 12th Street, SW, Washington DC 20554. Unless otherwise provided, requests for waiver of the Commission's rules are subject to treatment by the Commission as restricted proceedings for ex parte purposes under section 1.1208 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.1208. Because of the potential impact of this proceeding on persons not parties to the Waiver Request, this proceeding shall be treated as a permit-but-disclose proceeding under the ex parte rules, which are codified at 47 C.F.R. �� 1.1200(a), 1.1206. Therefore, ex parte presentations will be allowed but must be disclosed in accordance
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1954A1.pdf
  • Secretary, Federal Communications Commission, dated August 8, 2008 ("Letter Request"). On August 18, 2008, the Satellite Division, on its own motion, designated the matter as "permit-but-disclose" for purposes of the Commission's rules governing ex parte communications. The Satellite Division finds that designating this matter as "permit-but-disclose" will facilitate resolution of the issues raised. See 47 C.F.R. �6 1.1200(a), 1.1206 and 1.1208 note 2. This action is without prejudice to any determination regarding the processing of the Letter Request. Page 1 of 1
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2089A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2089A1.txt
  • 12, 2008, the Satellite Division, on its own motion, designated this matter as "permit-but-disclose" for purposes of the Commission's rules governing ex parte communications. In order to develop a full and complete record in this proceeding, the Satellite Division concludes that the public interest will be served by designating this proceeding as "permit-but-disclose." See 47 C.F.R. �� 1.1200(a), 1.1206 and 1.1208 note 2. This action is without prejudice to any action on this application. S2764 SAT-LOA-20080910-00174 Skynet Satellite Corporation On September 12, 2008, the Satellite Division, on its own motion, designated this matter as "permit-but-disclose" for purposes of the Commission's rules governing ex parte communications. In order to develop a full and complete record in this proceeding, the Satellite Division concludes
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2097A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2097A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2097A1.txt
  • from the date of this public notice. Replies to these comments and oppositions are due 20 days after the comments/oppositions deadline. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.4 for particulars regarding filing deadlines. Ex Parte Presentations. Unless otherwise provided, requests for waiver of the Commission's rules are subject to treatment by the Commission as restricted proceedings for ex parte purposes under section 1.1208 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.1208. Because of the policy implications and potential impact of the collective proceedings in CG Docket No. 06-181 on persons not necessarily party to each individual petition for exemption, we have found that it is in the public interest to treat CG Docket No. 06-181 as a permit-but-disclose proceeding under the Commission's ex
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2150A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2150A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2150A1.txt
  • its participation in the competitive bidding process, it may be subject to forfeiture of its upfront payment, down payment, or full bid amount, and may be prohibited from participating in future auctions. Ex Parte Rule. Applicants should also be aware that the Commission has generally exempted auction proceedings from the strict requirements of the ex parte rule found in Section 1.1208 of the Commission's rules. Mock Auction. All applicants found to be qualified bidders will be eligible to participate in a mock auction on Monday, November 3, 2008. The Bureaus encourage all qualified bidders to take advantage of this opportunity to become familiar with the FCC's Integrated Spectrum Auction System (``ISAS'' or ``FCC Auction System''). In the public notice announcing the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2731A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2731A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2731A1.txt
  • and Fairness in Broadcast Journalism; John L. Moore and Frederick K. Oringel; Members of Congress Debbie Wasserman Schultz, Ron Klein, and Kendrick B. Meek; and Florida State Representative Julio Robaina. Applications for consent to the assignment of broadcast licenses and authorizations are subject, unless otherwise provided, to treatment by the Commission as restricted proceedings for ex parte purposes under Section 1.1208 of the Commission's rules. 47 C.F.R. �1.1208. We have concluded, however, that classifying this proceeding as permit-but-disclose would, in this case, permit broader public participation and thereby serve the public interest. Accordingly, by this Public Notice, and pursuant to Section 1.1200(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �1.1200(a), we announce that the ex parte procedures applicable to permit-but-disclose proceedings will
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2736A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2736A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2736A1.txt
  • from the date of this public notice. Replies to these comments and oppositions are due 20 days after the comments/oppositions deadline. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.4 for particulars regarding filing deadlines. Ex Parte Presentations. Unless otherwise provided, requests for waiver of the Commission's rules are subject to treatment by the Commission as restricted proceedings for ex parte purposes under section 1.1208 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.1208. Because of the policy implications and potential impact of the collective proceedings in CG Docket No. 06-181 on persons not necessarily party to each individual petition for exemption, we have found that it is in the public interest to treat CG Docket No. 06-181 as a permit-but-disclose proceeding under the Commission's ex
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2772A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2772A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2772A1.txt
  • new entrant into the broadcasting industry, seeks consent to acquire share-time license that would authorize it to broadcast on channels licensed to 42 digital TV stations currently controlled by ION. Applications for consent to the assignment of broadcast licenses and authorizations are subject, unless otherwise provided, to treatment by the Commission as restricted proceedings for ex parte purposes under Section 1.1208 of the Commission's rules. 47 C.F.R. �1.1208. We have concluded, however, that classifying this proceeding as permit-but-disclose would, in this case, permit broader public participation and thereby serve the public interest. Accordingly, by this Public Notice, and pursuant to Section 1.1200(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �1.1200(a), we announce that the ex parte procedures applicable to permit-but-disclose proceedings will
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-350A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-350A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-350A1.txt
  • from the date of this public notice. Replies to these comments and oppositions are due 20 days after the comments/oppositions deadline. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.4 for particulars regarding filing deadlines. Ex Parte Presentations. Unless otherwise provided, requests for waiver of the Commission's rules are subject to treatment by the Commission as restricted proceedings for ex parte purposes under section 1.1208 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.1208. Because of the policy implications and potential impact of the collective proceedings in CG Docket No. 06-181 on persons not necessarily party to each individual petition for exemption, we have found that it is in the public interest to treat CG Docket No. 06-181 as a permit-but-disclose proceeding under the Commission's ex
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-54A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-54A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-54A1.txt
  • Commission's Secretary, Office of the Secretary, Federal Communications Commission. See FCC Announces a New Filing Location for Paper Documents and a New Fax Number for General Correspondence, Public Notice, 16 FCC Rcd 22165 (2001). Unless otherwise provided, requests for waiver of the Commission's Rules are subject to treatment by the Commission as restricted proceedings for ex parte purposes under Section 1.1208 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.1208. Because of the policy implications and potential impact of this proceeding on persons not parties to the waiver requests, we believe it would be in the public interest to treat this case as a permit-but-disclose proceeding under the ex parte rules. See Sections 1.1200(a), 1.1206 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. ��
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-71A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-71A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-71A1.txt
  • from the date of this public notice. Replies to these comments and oppositions are due 20 days after the comments/oppositions deadline. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.4 for particulars regarding filing deadlines. Ex Parte Presentations. Unless otherwise provided, requests for waiver of the Commission's rules are subject to treatment by the Commission as restricted proceedings for ex parte purposes under section 1.1208 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.1208. Because of the policy implications and potential impact of the collective proceedings in CG Docket No. 06-181 on persons not necessarily party to each individual petition for exemption, we have found that it is in the public interest to treat CG Docket No. 06-181 as a permit-but-disclose proceeding under the Commission's ex
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-793A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-793A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-793A1.txt
  • from the date of this public notice. Replies to these comments and oppositions are due 20 days after the comments/oppositions deadline. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.4 for particulars regarding filing deadlines. Ex Parte Presentations. Unless otherwise provided, requests for waiver of the Commission's rules are subject to treatment by the Commission as restricted proceedings for ex parte purposes under section 1.1208 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.1208. Because of the policy implications and potential impact of the collective proceedings in CG Docket No. 06-181 on persons not necessarily party to each individual petition for exemption, we have found that it is in the public interest to treat CG Docket No. 06-181 as a permit-but-disclose proceeding under the Commission's ex
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1003A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1003A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1003A1.txt
  • Trinity replied on January 27, 2009. 47 C.F.R. �� 73.3527 and 73.3580. The Opposition also contains a request, to the extent that one is necessary, for waiver of Section 73.3580 of the Rules. File No. BNPED-20071018AHP (granted April 22, 2008). Reply at 2. 47 C.F.R. � 1.47(g) lists the requirements for valid proof of service. See 47 C.F.R. �� 1.1202(b), 1.1208. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.47. See John F. Garziglia, Esq., and Donald E. Martin, Esq., Letter, 22 FCC Rcd 8409, 8414 (MB 2007) (admonishing NCE licensee, not represented by FCC counsel, for apparent violation of the ex parte Rules due to ignorance of the Rules). 47 U.S.C. � 309(e). 47 U.S.C. � 309(a). See, e.g., WWOR-TV, Inc., Memorandum Opinion and
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1090A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1090A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1090A1.txt
  • phone at (202) 488-5300 or (800) 378-3160, or by facsimile at (202) 488-5563. For further information regarding the public reference file for this waiver request, contact Maria Ringold, Chief, Wireless Branch, RIC, (202) 418-1355. Unless otherwise provided, requests for waiver of the Commission's Rules are subject to treatment by the Commission as restricted proceedings for ex parte purposes under Section 1.1208 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.1208. Because of the policy implications and potential impact of this proceeding on persons not parties to the waiver request, we believe it would be in the public interest to treat this case as a permit-but-disclose proceeding under the ex parte rules. See Sections 1.1200(a), 1.1206 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. ��
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1090A1_Rcd.pdf
  • fcc@bcpiwebcom, by phone at (202) 488-5300 or (800) 378-3160, or by facsimile at (202) 488-5563. For further information regarding the public reference file for this waiver request, contact Maria Ringold, Chief, WirelessBranch, RIC, (202) 418-1355. Unless otherwise provided, requests for waiver of the Commission's Rules are subject to treatment by the Commission as restricted proceedings for ex partepurposes under Section 1.1208 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.1208. Because of the policy implications and potential impact of this proceeding on persons not parties to the waiver request, we believe it would be in the public interest to treat this case as a permit-but-disclose proceeding under the ex parterules. See Sections 1.1200(a), 1.1206 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.1200(a),
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1262A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1262A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1262A1.txt
  • 897 F.2d at 1166. See Procedures Established for Arbitration of an Interconnection Agreement Between Intrado Communications of Virginia and Embarq, WC Docket No. 08-33, Public Notice, 23 FCC Rcd 12020 (2008); Procedures Established for Arbitration of an Interconnection Agreement Between Intrado Communications of Virginia and Verizon, WC Docket No. 08-185, Public Notice, 23 FCC Rcd 17854 (2008); 47 C.F.R. � 1.1208. 47 C.F.R. � 1.1208; see AT&T Corp. v. Business Telecom. Inc., EB-01-MD-001, EB-01-MD-002, Order, 16 FCC Rcd 18159, 18161-62, para. 6 (2001) (explaining that in a restricted proceeding ``no person may make to any Commission decision-making personnel any communication directed to the merits or outcome [of the proceeding], unless the communication, if written, is served on the parties to the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1306A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1306A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1306A1.txt
  • Commission's Secretary, Office of the Secretary, Federal Communications Commission. See FCC Announces a New Filing Location for Paper Documents and a New Fax Number for General Correspondence, Public Notice, 16 FCC Rcd 22165 (2001). Unless otherwise provided, requests for waiver of the Commission's Rules are subject to treatment by the Commission as restricted proceedings for ex parte purposes under Section 1.1208 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.1208. Because of the policy implications and potential impact of this proceeding on persons not parties to the waiver requests, we believe it would be in the public interest to treat this case as a permit-but-disclose proceeding under the ex parte rules. See Sections 1.1200(a), 1.1206 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. ��
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1306A1_Rcd.pdf
  • the Commission's Secretary, Office of the Secretary, Federal Communications Commission. See FCCAnnounces a New Filing Location for Paper Documents and a New Fax Number for General Correspondence, Public Notice, 16 FCC Rcd 22165 (2001). Unless otherwise provided, requests for waiver of the Commission's Rules are subject to treatment by the Commission as restricted proceedings for ex parte purposes under Section 1.1208 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.1208. Because of the policy implications and potential impact of this proceeding on persons not parties to the waiver requests, we believe itwould be in the public interest to treat this case as a permit-but-disclose proceeding under the ex parte rules. See Sections 1.1200(a), 1.1206 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.1200(a),
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1548A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1548A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1548A1.txt
  • its participation in the competitive bidding process, it may be subject to forfeiture of its upfront payment, down payment, or full bid amount, and may be prohibited from participating in future auctions. Ex Parte Rule. Applicants should also be aware that the Commission has generally exempted auction proceedings from the strict requirements of the ex parte rule found in Section 1.1208 of the Commission's rules. Mock Auction. All applicants found to be qualified bidders will be eligible to participate in a mock auction on Friday, August 28, 2009. The Bureaus encourage all qualified bidders to take advantage of this opportunity to become familiar with the FCC's Integrated Spectrum Auction System (``ISAS'' or ``FCC Auction System''). In the public notice announcing the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1548A1_Rcd.pdf
  • with its participation in the competitive bidding process, it may be subject to forfeiture of its upfront payment, down payment, or full bid amount, and may be prohibited from participating in future auctions.38 22.Ex Parte Rule. Applicants should also be aware thatthe Commission has generally exempted auction proceedings from the strict requirements of the ex parte rule found in Section 1.1208 of the Commission's rules.39 23.Mock Auction. All applicants found to be qualified bidders will be eligible to participate in a mock auction on Friday, August 28, 2009. The Bureaus encourage all qualified bidders to take advantage of this opportunity to become familiar with the FCC's Integrated Spectrum Auction System ("ISAS" or "FCC Auction System"). In the public notice announcing the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1594A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1594A1.txt
  • law and policy are at issue. See Establishment of Rules and Policies for the Digital Audio Radio Satellite Service in the 2310-2360 MHz Frequency Band, IB Docket No. 97-91, Second Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, 22 FCC Rcs 22123 (2007). Thus, we designate IBFS File Nos. SAT-STA-20081027-00210 as "permit-but-disclose," effective July 22, 2009. See 47 C.F.R. �� 1.1200(a), 1.1206 and 1.1208 note 2. This action is without prejudice to any determination regarding the processing of the application. Page 2 of 2
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1594A1_Rcd.pdf
  • law and policy are at issue. See Establishment of Rules and Policies for the Digital Audio Radio Satellite Service in the 2310-2360 MHz Frequency Band, IB Docket No. 97-91, Second Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, 22 FCC Rcs 22123 (2007). Thus, we designate IBFS File Nos. SAT-STA-20081027-00210 as "permit-but-disclose," effective July 22, 2009. See 47 C.F.R. �� 1.1200(a), 1.1206 and 1.1208 note 2. This action is without prejudice to any determination regarding the processing of the application. 9330
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1764A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1764A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1764A1.txt
  • Commission's Secretary, Office of the Secretary, Federal Communications Commission. See FCC Announces a New Filing Location for Paper Documents and a New Fax Number for General Correspondence, Public Notice, 16 FCC Rcd 22165 (2001). Unless otherwise provided, requests for waiver of the Commission's Rules are subject to treatment by the Commission as restricted proceedings for ex parte purposes under Section 1.1208 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.1208. Because of the policy implications and potential impact of this proceeding on persons not parties to the waiver requests, we believe it would be in the public interest to treat this case as a permit-but-disclose proceeding under the ex parte rules. See Sections 1.1200(a), 1.1206 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. ��
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1764A1_Rcd.pdf
  • Commission's Secretary, Office of the Secretary, Federal Communications Commission. See FCC Announces a New Filing Location for Paper Documents and a New Fax Number for General Correspondence, Public Notice, 16 FCC Rcd 22165 (2001). Unless otherwise provided, requests for waiver of the Commission's Rules are subject to treatment by the Commission as restricted proceedings for ex parte purposes under Section 1.1208of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.1208. Because of the policy implications and potential impact of this proceeding on persons not parties to the waiver requests, we believe it would be in the public interest to treat this case as a permit-but-disclose proceeding under the ex parte rules. See Sections 1.1200(a), 1.1206 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.1200(a),
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1796A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1796A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1796A1.txt
  • and Zwirn responses to an Enforcement Bureau letter of inquiry leaving Cherry unable to file a ``meaningful opposition'' to the assignment to the Receiver or to participate fully in the Commission's consideration of the alleged Section 310(d) violation. Cherry contends that his being denied ``notice or opportunity . . . to participate'' is also a violation of Sections 1.1206 and 1.1208 of the ex parte Rules. Finally, Cherry asserts that rather than retaliate against him, the Commission should grant his request for ``an injunction against the transfer by the FCC of any formerly held [Tama] licenses . . . .'' In opposition, the Receiver claims that Cherry's Objection is just one of a ``long, ever-growing list of frivolous'' filings and that
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1961A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1961A1.txt
  • its own motion, designated the following SkyTerra Subsidiary LLC applications to modify its authority to operate its current and future mobile satellite service systems using certain frequencies in the L-band as "permit-but-disclose" for purposes of the Commission's rules governing ex parte communications, effective August 21, 2009: IBFS File Nos. SAT-MOD-20090813-00088, SAT-MOD-20090813-00089, and SES-MOD-20090813-00997. See 47 C.F.R. �� 1.1200(a), 1.1206 and 1.1208 note 2. We find that designating these proceedings as "permit-but-disclose" will facilitate resolution of the complex policy issues raised by the applications. This action is without prejudice to any determination regarding the processing of these applications. S2358 SAT-MOD-20090813-00089 SkyTerra Subsidiary LLC On August 21, 2009, the Satellite Division, on its own motion, designated the following SkyTerra Subsidiary LLC applications to
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1961A1_Rcd.pdf
  • its own motion, designated the following SkyTerra Subsidiary LLC applications to modify its authority to operate its current and future mobile satellite service systems using certain frequencies in the L-band as "permit-but-disclose" for purposes of the Commission's rules governing ex parte communications, effective August 21, 2009: IBFS File Nos. SAT-MOD-20090813-00088, SAT-MOD-20090813-00089, and SES-MOD-20090813-00997. See 47 C.F.R. �� 1.1200(a), 1.1206 and 1.1208 note 2. We find that designating these proceedings as "permit-but-disclose" will facilitate resolution of the complex policy issues raised by the applications. This action is without prejudice to any determination regarding the processing of these applications. S2358 SAT-MOD-20090813-00089 SkyTerra Subsidiary LLC On August 21, 2009, the Satellite Division, on its own motion, designated the following SkyTerra Subsidiary LLC applications to
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2076A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2076A1.txt
  • its associated bond waiver and milestone requests were rendered moot. We find that designating this proceeding as "permit-but-disclose" will facilitate communication with the parties. Thus, we designate IBFS File Nos. SAT-LOA-19971222-00222, SAT-LOA-20040322-00234/35/36/37, SAT-MOD-20060511-00057/58/59/60, SAT-AMD-20031030-00317, SAT-AMD-20040719-00141, SAT-AMD-20040322-00057, SAT-AMD-20051118-00243, SAT-MOD-20070924-00130, SAT-AMD-20071215-00176, SAT-MOD-20070924-00132, SAT-AMD-20080505-00100, SAT-AMD-20080505-00096, SAT-AMD-20080505-00099, SAT-MOD-20080813-00155, SAT-AMD-20080930-00195, and SAT-AMD-20080930-00194 as "permit-but-disclose," effective September 17, 2009. See 47 C.F.R. �� 1.1200(a), 1.1206 and 1.1208 note 2. SAT-STA-20090701-00071 Sirius XM Radio Inc. On September 16, 2009, the Policy Branch granted the request of Sirius XM Radio Inc. to designate its application for special temporary authority to operate terrestrial repeaters in Cincinnati, Ohio, as "permit-but-disclose" for purposes of the Commission's rules governing ex parte communications. See Request for "Permit-But-Disclose" Ex Parte Status, filed by Sirius XM
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2076A1_Rcd.pdf
  • its associated bond waiver and milestone requests were rendered moot. We find that designating this proceeding as "permit-but-disclose" will facilitate communication with the parties. Thus, we designate IBFS File Nos. SAT-LOA-19971222-00222, SAT-LOA-20040322-00234/35/36/37, SAT-MOD-20060511-00057/58/59/60, SAT-AMD-20031030-00317, SAT-AMD-20040719-00141, SAT-AMD-20040322-00057, SAT-AMD-20051118-00243, SAT-MOD-20070924-00130, SAT-AMD-20071215-00176, SAT-MOD-20070924-00132, SAT-AMD-20080505-00100, SAT-AMD-20080505-00096, SAT-AMD-20080505-00099, SAT-MOD-20080813-00155, SAT-AMD-20080930-00195, and SAT-AMD-20080930-00194 as "permit-but-disclose," effective September 17, 2009. See 47 C.F.R. �� 1.1200(a), 1.1206 and 1.1208 note 2. SAT-STA-20090701-00071 Sirius XM Radio Inc. On September 16, 2009, the Policy Branch granted the request of Sirius XM Radio Inc. to designate its application for special temporary authority to operate terrestrial repeaters in Cincinnati, Ohio, as "permit-but-disclose" for purposes of the Commission's rules governing ex parte communications. See Request for "Permit-But-Disclose" Ex Parte Status, filed by Sirius XM
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2224A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2224A1.txt
  • motion of SkyTerra Subsidiary LLC to designate the following applications to modify SkyTerra's authority to operate its current and future mobile satellite service systems using certain frequencies in the L-band as "permit-but-disclose" for purposes of the Commission's rules governing ex parte communications, effective October 15, 2009: IBFS File Nos. SAT-MOD-20090429-00046, SAT-MOD-20090429-00047, and SES-MOD-20090429-00536. See 47 C.F.R. �� 1.1200(a), 1.1206 and 1.1208 note 2. We find that designating these proceedings as "permit-but-disclose" will facilitate resolution of the complex policy issues raised by the applications. This action is without prejudice to any determination regarding the processing of these applications. Page 1 of 2 For more information concerning this Notice, contact the Satellite Division at 202-418-0719; TTY 202-418-2555. INFORMATIVE AMSC-1 SAT-MOD-20090429-00047 SkyTerra Subsidiary LLC
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2224A1_Rcd.pdf
  • motion of SkyTerra Subsidiary LLC to designate the following applications to modify SkyTerra's authority to operate its current and future mobile satellite service systems using certain frequencies in the L-band as "permit-but-disclose" for purposes of the Commission's rules governing ex parte communications, effective October 15, 2009: IBFS File Nos. SAT-MOD-20090429-00046, SAT-MOD-20090429-00047, and SES-MOD-20090429-00536. See 47 C.F.R. �� 1.1200(a), 1.1206 and 1.1208 note 2. We find that designating these proceedings as "permit-but-disclose" will facilitate resolution of the complex policy issues raised by the applications. This action is without prejudice to any determination regarding the processing of these applications. 12634 For more information concerning this Notice, contact the Satellite Division at 202-418-0719; TTY 202-418-2555. INFORMATIVE AMSC-1 SAT-MOD-20090429-00047 SkyTerra Subsidiary LLC On October 15,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-238A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-238A1.txt
  • in the 1.6 GHz Frequency Band, Order of Modifications, FCC 08-248 (rel. Oct. 15, 2008). In order to develop a full and complete record in this proceeding, the Satellite Division concludes that the public interest will be served by designating matters relating to the spectrum reassignments in Globalstar's 1.6/2.4 GHz license as "permit-but-disclose." See 47 C.F.R. �� 1.1200(a), 1.1206, and 1.1208 note 2. S2115 SAT-STA-20081215-00231 Globalstar Licensee LLC On February 13, 2009, the Satellite Division, on its own motion, designated this matter as "permit-but-disclose" for purposes of the Commission's rules governing ex parte communications. In order to develop a full and complete record in this application proceeding, the Satellite Division concludes that the public interest will be served by designating this
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2396A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2396A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2396A1.txt
  • way to insure that the Commission understands the issues.'' On November 5, 2009, Mediacom filed a Reply to the Opposition arguing that Sinclair's reasons for maintaining ``restricted'' ex parte status are not persuasive. Although a retransmission consent complaint pursuant to Section 76.65 is ordinarily treated as a ``restricted'' proceeding in which ex parte presentations are generally prohibited pursuant to Section 1.1208 of the Commission's rules, the Commission, or its staff pursuant to delegated authority, under Section 1.1200(a), may adopt modified ex parte procedures in particular proceedings ``where the public interest so requires.'' Mediacom's Complaint and its Petition for Interim Carriage raise time sensitive policy issues as to the carriage of the affected stations on Mediacom's systems. In this regard, the Commission
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2583A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2583A1.txt
  • Globalstar Licensee LLC On December 8, 2009, the Satellite Division designated the above-captioned proceeding as "permit-but-disclose" for purposes of the Commission's rules governing ex parte communications. We find that designating this proceeding as "permit-but-disclose" will facilitate communications with the parties. Thus, we designate IBFS File No. SAT-MOD-20080904-00165 as "permit-but-disclose," effective December 8, 2009. See 47 C.F.R. �� 1.1200(a), 1.1206 and 1.1208 note 2. Page 2 of 2
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2583A1_Rcd.pdf
  • Globalstar Licensee LLC On December 8, 2009, the Satellite Division designated the above-captioned proceeding as "permit-but-disclose" for purposes of the Commission's rules governing ex parte communications. We find that designating this proceeding as "permit-but-disclose" will facilitate communications with the parties. Thus, we designate IBFS File No. SAT-MOD-20080904-00165 as "permit-but-disclose," effective December 8, 2009. See 47 C.F.R. �� 1.1200(a), 1.1206 and 1.1208 note 2. 14479
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2607A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2607A1.txt
  • DIRECTV Enterprises, LLC On December 15, 2009, the Satellite Division designated the above-captioned proceeding as "permit-but-disclose" for purposes of the Commission's rules governing ex parte communications. We find that designating this proceeding as "permit-but-disclose" will facilitate communications with the parties. Thus, we designate IBFS File No. SAT-LOA-20090807-00085 as "permit-but-disclose," effective December 15, 2009. See 47 C.F.R. �� 1.1200(a), 1.1206 and 1.1208 note 2. Page 2 of 2
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2607A1_Rcd.pdf
  • DIRECTV Enterprises, LLC On December 15, 2009, the Satellite Division designated the above-captioned proceeding as "permit-but-disclose" for purposes of the Commission's rules governing ex parte communications. We find that designating this proceeding as "permit-but-disclose" will facilitate communications with the parties. Thus, we designate IBFS File No. SAT-LOA-20090807-00085 as "permit-but-disclose," effective December 15, 2009. See 47 C.F.R. �� 1.1200(a), 1.1206 and 1.1208 note 2. 14607
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-542A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-542A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-542A1.txt
  • 12th Street, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20554. All filings must be addressed to the Commission's Secretary, Marlene H. Dortch, Office of the Secretary, Federal Communications Commission, 445 12th Street, SW, Room TW-B204, Washington, DC 20554. Unless otherwise provided, requests for waiver of the Commission's rules are subject to treatment by the Commission as restricted proceedings for ex parte purposes under section 1.1208 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.1208. Because of the potential impact of this proceeding on persons not parties to the Petition, this proceeding shall be treated as a permit-but-disclose proceeding under the ex parte rules, which are codified at 47 C.F.R. �� 1.1200(a), 1.1206. Therefore, ex parte presentations will be allowed but must be disclosed in accordance with
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-719A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-719A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-719A1.txt
  • action against a regional wireless carrier, MetroPCS, for refusing to pay North County Communications for use of its network as the FCC's rules require.'' Id. at 1 (emphasis added). Id. Formal complaints are made restricted by 47 C.F.R. �� 1.1202(d)(2) (stating that parties to a formal complaint are parties to a proceeding for purposes of the ex parte rules) and 1.1208 (stating that proceedings not otherwise designated are restricted). Ex parte presentations to and from Commission decision-makers are prohibited in restricted proceedings. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.1208. The resolution of this issue was made in consultation with the Commission's Office of General Counsel, in accordance with 47 C.F.R. � 0.251(g). See Letter from David Senzel, Attorney-Advisor, Office of General Counsel, FCC,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-116A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-116A1.txt
  • support of relief efforts in Haiti. INFORMATIVE S2763 SAT-LOA-20080910-00173 SES Americom, Inc. On January 21, 2010, the Satellite Division designated the above-captioned proceeding as "permit-but-disclose" for purposes of the Commission's rules governing ex parte communications, effective January 21, 2010. We find that designating this proceeding as "permit-but-disclose" will facilitate communications with the parties. See 47 C.F.R. �� 1.1200(a), 1.1206 and 1.1208 note 2. S2764 SAT-LOA-20080910-00174 SKYNET SATELLITE CORPORATION On January 21, 2010, the Satellite Division granted the motion of Skynet Satellite Corporation to designate the above-captioned proceeding as "permit-but-disclose" for purposes of the Commission's rules governing ex parte communications. Accordingly, IBFS File Number SAT-LOA-20080910-00174 is designated as "permit-but-disclose" proceedings under the Commission's ex parte rules, effective January 21, 2010. We find
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-116A1_Rcd.pdf
  • support of relief efforts in Haiti. INFORMATIVE S2763 SAT-LOA-20080910-00173 SES Americom, Inc. On January 21, 2010, the Satellite Division designated the above-captioned proceeding as "permit-but-disclose" for purposes of the Commission's rules governing ex parte communications, effective January 21, 2010. We find that designating this proceeding as "permit-but-disclose" will facilitate communications with the parties. See 47 C.F.R. �� 1.1200(a), 1.1206 and 1.1208 note 2. S2764 SAT-LOA-20080910-00174 SKYNET SATELLITE CORPORATION On January 21, 2010, the Satellite Division granted the motion of Skynet Satellite Corporation to designate the above-captioned proceeding as "permit-but-disclose" for purposes of the Commission's rules governing ex parte communications. Accordingly, IBFS File Number SAT-LOA-20080910-00174 is designated as "permit-but-disclose" proceedings under the Commission's ex parte rules, effective January 21, 2010. We find
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1284A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1284A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1284A1.txt
  • Priority mail must be addressed to 445 12th Street, SW, Washington DC 20554. . For further information regarding the public reference file for this waiver request, contact the Reference Information Center at (202) 418-0270. Unless otherwise provided, requests for waiver of the Commission's Rules are subject to treatment by the Commission as restricted proceedings for ex parte purposes under Section 1.1208 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.1208. Because of the policy implications and potential impact of this proceeding on persons not parties to the waiver request, we believe it would be in the public interest to treat this case as a permit-but-disclose proceeding under the ex parte rules. See Sections 1.1200(a), 1.1206 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. ��
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1284A1_Rcd.pdf
  • Section 27.53(l)(1) of the Commission's Rules, the applicable rule is 47 C.F.R. � 27.53(m)(1). 9100 fcc@bcpiweb.com. For further information regarding the publicreference file for this waiver request, contact the Reference Information Center at (202) 418-0270. Unless otherwise provided, requests for waiver of the Commission's Rules are subject to treatment by the Commission as restricted proceedings for ex partepurposes under Section 1.1208 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.1208. Because of the policy implications and potential impact of this proceeding on persons not parties to the waiver request, we believe it would be in the public interest to treat this case as a permit-but-disclose proceeding under the ex parterules. See Sections 1.1200(a), 1.1206 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.1200(a),
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1356A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1356A1.txt
  • 202-418-0719; TTY 202-418-2555. INFORMATIVE On July 22, 2010, the Satellite Division granted the request of Sprint Nextel Corporation to designate the above-captioned proceeding as "permit-but-disclose" for purposes of the Commission's rules governing ex parte communications, effective July 22, 2010. We find that designating this proceeding as "permit-but-disclose" will facilitate communications with the parties. See 47 C.F.R. �� 1.1200(a), 1.1206 and 1.1208 note 2. Page 3 of 3
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1356A1_Rcd.pdf
  • 202-418-0719; TTY 202-418-2555. INFORMATIVE On July 22, 2010, the Satellite Division granted the request of Sprint Nextel Corporation to designate the above-captioned proceeding as "permit-but-disclose" for purposes of the Commission's rules governing ex parte communications, effective July 22, 2010. We find that designating this proceeding as "permit-but-disclose" will facilitate communications with the parties. See 47 C.F.R. �� 1.1200(a), 1.1206 and 1.1208 note 2. 10062
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1554A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1554A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1554A1.txt
  • to its authority under section 1.1200(a) of the Commission's Rules, announced that this proceeding would be governed by permit-but-disclose ex parte procedures that are applicable to proceedings under section 1.1206 of the Commission's Rules. In its Petition for Reconsideration, Cellular South objects to the ex parte status of the proceeding, asserting that the Bureau's decision was a violation of section 1.1208 of the Commission's Rules and section 309(d) of the Communications Act, as well as procedural and due process rights. Discussion. This is the third time Cellular South has raised these arguments before the Commission. The Commission has recently addressed them in the AT&T-Verizon Wireless Order and AT&T-Centennial Order. The Commission concluded in both orders that, in what otherwise would be
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1554A1_Rcd.pdf
  • Bureau ("Bureau"), pursuant to its authority under section 1.1200(a) of the Commission's Rules,269announced that this proceeding would be governed by permit-but-disclose ex parteprocedures that are applicable to proceedings under section 1.1206 of the Commission's Rules.270 In its Petition for Reconsideration, Cellular South objects to the ex partestatus of the proceeding, asserting that the Bureau's decision was a violation of section 1.1208 of the Commission's Rules and section 309(d) of the Communications Act, as well as proceduraland due process rights.271 86. Discussion. This is the third time Cellular South has raised these arguments before the Commission. The Commission has recently addressed them in the AT&T-Verizon Wireless Order and AT&T-Centennial Order.272The Commission concluded in both orders that, in what otherwise would be a
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1606A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1606A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1606A1.txt
  • sent to 9300 East Hampton Drive, Capitol Heights, MD 20743. -U.S. Postal Service first-class mail, Express Mail, and Priority Mail should be addressed to 445 12th Street, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20554. . . . Unless otherwise provided, requests for waiver of the Commission's Rules are subject to treatment by the Commission as restricted proceedings for ex parte purposes under Section 1.1208 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.1208. Because of the policy implications and potential impact of this proceeding on persons not parties to the waiver requests, we believe it would be in the public interest to treat this case as a permit-but-disclose proceeding under the ex parte rules. See Sections 1.1200(a), 1.1206 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. ��
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1606A1_Rcd.pdf
  • diskette, large print, audio recording, and Braille) are available to persons with disabilities by contacting the Consumer and Governmental Affairs Bureau at (202) 418-0530 (voice), (202) 418-0432 (TTY), or send an e-mail to fcc504@fcc.gov. Unless otherwise provided, requests for waiver of the Commission's Rules are subject to treatment by the Commission as restricted proceedings for ex parte purposes under Section 1.1208 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.1208. Because of the policy implications and potential impact of this proceeding on persons not parties to the waiver requests, we believe it would be in the public interest to treat this case as a permit-but-disclose proceeding under the ex parte rules. See Sections 1.1200(a), 1.1206 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. ��
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1631A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1631A1.txt
  • No. SAT-MOD-19961204-00139 for a description of the action taken. S2110 SAT-MOD-19961204-00139 IRIDIUM CONSTELLATION LLC On August 27, 2010, the Satellite Division designated the above-captioned proceeding as "permit-but-disclose" for purposes of the Commission's rules governing ex parte communications, effective immediately. We find that designating this proceeding as "permit-but-disclose" will facilitate communications with the parties. See 47 C.F.R. �� 1.1200(a), 1.1206 and 1.1208 note 2. S2135 SAT-MOD-20100623-00144 SES Americom, Inc. On August 27, 2010, the Satellite Division designated the above-captioned proceeding as "permit-but-disclose" for purposes of the Commission's rules governing ex parte communications, effective immediately. We find that designating this proceeding as "permit-but-disclose" will facilitate communications with the parties. See 47 C.F.R. �� 1.1200(a), 1.1206 and 1.1208 note 2. Page 2 of 2
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1631A1_Rcd.pdf
  • No. SAT-MOD-19961204-00139 for a description of the action taken. S2110 SAT-MOD-19961204-00139 IRIDIUM CONSTELLATION LLC On August 27, 2010, the Satellite Division designated the above-captioned proceeding as "permit-but-disclose" for purposes of the Commission's rules governing ex parte communications, effective immediately. We find that designating this proceeding as "permit-but-disclose" will facilitate communications with the parties. See 47 C.F.R. �� 1.1200(a), 1.1206 and 1.1208 note 2. S2135 SAT-MOD-20100623-00144 SES Americom, Inc. On August 27, 2010, the Satellite Division designated the above-captioned proceeding as "permit-but-disclose" for purposes of the Commission's rules governing ex parte communications, effective immediately. We find that designating this proceeding as "permit-but-disclose" will facilitate communications with the parties. See 47 C.F.R. �� 1.1200(a), 1.1206 and 1.1208 note 2. 12509
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1904A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1904A1.txt
  • See IBFS File No. SAT-STA-20070713-00098. INFORMATIVE S2795 SAT-AMD-20100528-00114 Pegasus Development DBS Corporation On September 30, 2010, the Satellite Division designated the above-captioned proceeding as "permit-but-disclose" for purposes of the Commission's rules governing ex parte communications, effective September 30, 2010. We find that designating this proceeding as "permit-but-disclose" will facilitate communications with the parties. See 47 C.F.R. �� 1.1200(a), 1.1206 and 1.1208 note 2. Page 1 of 2 For more information concerning this Notice, contact the Satellite Division at 202-418-0719; TTY 202-418-2555. INFORMATIVE S2795 SAT-LOA-20090807-00084 Pegasus Development DBS Corporation On September 30, 2010, the Satellite Division designated the above-captioned proceeding as "permit-but-disclose" for purposes of the Commission's rules governing ex parte communications, effective September 30, 2010. We find that designating this proceeding
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1904A1_Rcd.pdf
  • See IBFS File No. SAT-STA-20070713-00098. INFORMATIVE S2795 SAT-AMD-20100528-00114 Pegasus Development DBS Corporation On September 30, 2010, the Satellite Division designated the above-captioned proceeding as "permit-but-disclose" for purposes of the Commission's rules governing ex parte communications, effective September 30, 2010. We find that designating this proceeding as "permit-but-disclose" will facilitate communications with the parties. See 47 C.F.R. �� 1.1200(a), 1.1206 and 1.1208 note 2. 13729 For more information concerning this Notice, contact the Satellite Division at 202-418-0719; TTY 202-418-2555. INFORMATIVE S2795 SAT-LOA-20090807-00084 Pegasus Development DBS Corporation On September 30, 2010, the Satellite Division designated the above-captioned proceeding as "permit-but-disclose" for purposes of the Commission's rules governing ex parte communications, effective September 30, 2010. We find that designating this proceeding as "permit-but-disclose" will
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-32A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-32A1.txt
  • (grant stamp, dated December 3, 2009). INFORMATIVE S2790 SAT-AMD-20090604-00064 DISH Operating L.L.C. On January 7, 2010, the Satellite Division designated the above-captioned proceeding as "permit-but-disclose" for purposes of the Commission's rules governing ex parte communications, effective January 7, 2010. We find that designating this proceeding as "permit-but-disclose" will facilitate communications with the parties. See 47 C.F.R. �� 1.1200(a), 1.1206 and 1.1208 note 2. S2790 SAT-LOA-20090518-00053 DISH Operating L.L.C. On January 7, 2010, the Satellite Division designated the above-captioned proceeding as "permit-but-disclose" for purposes of the Commission's rules governing ex parte communications, effective January 7, 2010. We find that designating this proceeding as "permit-but-disclose" will facilitate communications with the parties. See 47 C.F.R. �� 1.1200(a), 1.1206 and 1.1208 note 2. Page 1
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-32A1_Rcd.pdf
  • (grant stamp, dated December 3, 2009). INFORMATIVE S2790 SAT-AMD-20090604-00064 DISH Operating L.L.C. On January 7, 2010, the Satellite Division designated the above-captioned proceeding as "permit-but-disclose" for purposes of the Commission's rules governing ex parte communications, effective January 7, 2010. We find that designating this proceeding as "permit-but-disclose" will facilitate communications with the parties. See 47 C.F.R. �� 1.1200(a), 1.1206 and 1.1208 note 2. S2790 SAT-LOA-20090518-00053 DISH Operating L.L.C. On January 7, 2010, the Satellite Division designated the above-captioned proceeding as "permit-but-disclose" for purposes of the Commission's rules governing ex parte communications, effective January 7, 2010. We find that designating this proceeding as "permit-but-disclose" will facilitate communications with the parties. See 47 C.F.R. �� 1.1200(a), 1.1206 and 1.1208 note 2. 122 For
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-587A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-587A1.txt
  • GHz (space-to-Earth), and 14.00-14.5 GHz (Earth-to-space) frequency bands. INFORMATIVE S2115 SAT-MOD-20091214-00152 Globalstar Licensee LLC On March 30, 2010, the Satellite Division designated the above-captioned proceeding as "permit-but-disclose" for purposes of the Commission's rules governing ex parte communications, effective immediately. We find that designating this proceeding as "permit-but-disclose" will facilitate communications with the parties. See 47 C.F.R. �� 1.1200(a), 1.1206 and 1.1208 note 2. Page 2 of 2
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-587A1_Rcd.pdf
  • GHz (space-to-Earth), and 14.00-14.5 GHz (Earth-to-space) frequency bands. INFORMATIVE S2115 SAT-MOD-20091214-00152 Globalstar Licensee LLC On March 30, 2010, the Satellite Division designated the above-captioned proceeding as "permit-but-disclose" for purposes of the Commission's rules governing ex parte communications, effective immediately. We find that designating this proceeding as "permit-but-disclose" will facilitate communications with the parties. See 47 C.F.R. �� 1.1200(a), 1.1206 and 1.1208 note 2. 3306
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-95A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-95A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-95A1.txt
  • threatened...'' See 47 C.F.R. � 1.1204(a)(3). Section 1.1200(a) of the Commission's rules also provides, in pertinent part, that ``[w]here the public interest so requires in a particular proceeding, the Commission and its staff retain the discretion to modify the applicable ex parte rules by order, letter or public notice.'' 47 C.F.R. � 1.1204(a)(3). As explained in note 1 to Section 1.1208 of the Commission's rules, if an application is uncontested, the party and the Commission may freely make presentations. Once additional ``parties'' as defined by Section 1.1202(d) are involved in the proceeding, however, then pursuant to Section 1.1208 of the Commission's rules the proceeding is treated as restricted and ex parte presentations are prohibited. 47 C.F.R. � 1.1208. PUBLIC NOTICE Federal
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-95A1_Rcd.pdf
  • property is threatened..." See47 C.F.R. � 1.1204(a)(3). Section 1.1200(a) of the Commission's rules also provides, in pertinent part, that "[w]here the public interest so requires in a particular proceeding, the Commission and its staff retain the discretion to modify the applicable ex parterules by order, letter or public notice." 47 C.F.R. � 1.1204(a)(3). 2As explained in note 1 to Section 1.1208 of the Commission's rules, if an application is uncontested, the party and the Commission may freely make presentations. Once additional "parties" as defined by Section 1.1202(d) are involved in the proceeding, however, then pursuant to Section 1.1208 of the Commission's rules the proceeding is treated as restricted and ex partepresentations are prohibited. 47 C.F.R. � 1.1208. 374 Applicants also may
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1016A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1016A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1016A1.txt
  • 47 C.F.R. � 76.1502. The City of Boston and NATOA's filings were considered informal comments to the Commission as the submissions were not filed within five calendar days of the Commission's receipt of Digital Broadcasting's certification application. See 47 C.F.R. �76.1502(e)(1). See, Digital Broadcasting OVS, Memorandum Opinion and Order, DA 11-996 (rel. MB June 3, 2011). See 47 C.F.R. � 1.1208. 47 C.F.R. � 1.1200(a). Absent our action here, the proceeding would remain restricted until the proceeding is no longer subject to administrative reconsideration or review or judicial review. See 47 C.F.R. �� 1.1208, 1.206(f), and 1.115(d). See 47 C.F.R. �� 1.1200(a) & 1.1206. PUBLIC NOTICE Federal Communications Commission 445 12th St., S.W. Washington, D.C. 20554 News Media Information 202 /
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1077A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1077A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1077A1.txt
  • the Commission's program carriage complaint procedures, 47 C.F.R. � 76.1302''); 47 C.F.R. � 76.1302 (d). 47 C.F.R. � 76.1302 (e). See In the Matter of Certain of the Commission's Part 1 Rules of Practice and Procedure and Part 0 Rules of Commission Organization, Report and Order in GC Docket No. 10-44, 26 FCC Rcd 1594 (2011). See 47 C.F.R. � 1.1208; see also 47 C.F.R. � 1.1204(a). See Electronic Filing of Documents in Rulemaking Proceedings, GC Docket No. 97-113, Report and Order, 13 FCC Rcd 11322, 11326, � 8 (1998). PUBLIC NOTICE Federal Communications Commission 445 12th St., S.W. Washington, D.C. 20554 News Media Information 202 / 418-0500 Internet: http://www.fcc.gov TTY: 1-888-835-5322 j k l m � � � m F
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1353A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1353A1.txt
  • Intelsat License LLC On August 4, 2011, the Satellite Division designated the above-captioned proceeding as "permit-but-disclose" for purposes of the Commission's rules governing ex parte communications. We find that designating this proceeding as "permit-but-disclose" will facilitate communications with the parties. Thus, we designate IBFS File No. SAT-MOD-20110420-00073 as "permit-but-disclose," effective August 4, 2011. See 47 C.F.R. �� 1.1200(a), 1.1206 and 1.1208 note 2. S2469 SAT-STA-20110727-00137 Intelsat License LLC On August 4, 2011, the Satellite Division designated the above-captioned proceeding as "permit-but-disclose" for purposes of the Commission's rules governing ex parte communications. We find that designating this proceeding as "permit-but-disclose" will facilitate communications with the parties. Thus, we designate IBFS File No. SAT-STA-20110727-00137 as "permit-but-disclose," effective August 4, 2011. See 47 C.F.R.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1353A1_Rcd.pdf
  • Intelsat License LLC On August 4, 2011, the Satellite Division designated the above-captioned proceeding as "permit-but-disclose" for purposes of the Commission's rules governing ex parte communications. We find that designating this proceeding as "permit-but-disclose" will facilitate communications with the parties. Thus, we designate IBFS File No. SAT-MOD-20110420-00073 as "permit-but-disclose," effective August 4, 2011. See 47 C.F.R. �� 1.1200(a), 1.1206 and 1.1208 note 2. S2469 SAT-STA-20110727-00137 Intelsat License LLC On August 4, 2011, the Satellite Division designated the above-captioned proceeding as "permit-but-disclose" for purposes of the Commission's rules governing ex parte communications. We find that designating this proceeding as "permit-but-disclose" will facilitate communications with the parties. Thus, we designate IBFS File No. SAT-STA-20110727-00137 as "permit-but-disclose," effective August 4, 2011. See 47 C.F.R.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1465A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1465A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1465A1.txt
  • is threatened...'' 47 C.F.R. � 1.1204(a)(3). Section 1.1200(a) of the Commission's rules also provides, in pertinent part, that ``[w]here the public interest so requires in a particular proceeding, the Commission and its staff retain the discretion to modify the applicable ex parte rules by order, letter or public notice.'' 47 C.F.R. � 1.1204(a)(3). As explained in note 1 to Section 1.1208 of the Commission's rules, if an application is uncontested, the party and the Commission may freely make presentations. Once additional ``parties'' as defined by Section 1.1202(d) are involved in the proceeding, however, then pursuant to Section 1.1208 of the Commission's rules the proceeding is treated as restricted and ex parte presentations are prohibited. 47 C.F.R. � 1.1208. PUBLIC NOTICE Federal
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1465A1_Rcd.pdf
  • property is threatened..." 47 C.F.R. � 1.1204(a)(3). Section 1.1200(a) of the Commission's rules also provides, in pertinent part, that "[w]here the public interest so requires in a particular proceeding, the Commission and its staff retain the discretion to modify the applicable ex parterules by order, letter or public notice." 47 C.F.R. � 1.1204(a)(3). 2As explained in note 1 to Section 1.1208 of the Commission's rules, if an application is uncontested, the partyand the Commission may freely make presentations. Once additional "parties" as defined by Section 1.1202(d) are involved in the proceeding, however, then pursuant to Section 1.1208 of the Commission's rules the proceeding is treated as restricted and ex partepresentations are prohibited. 47 C.F.R. � 1.1208. 12508 Special Temporary Authority (Submarine
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1650A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1650A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1650A1.txt
  • arrangements with microwave licensees. We also note that because the 29.25-29.5 GHz band is allocated for Earth-to-space use by FSS systems, the potential for interference into GSO FSS from FS is limited. Request to Modify Ex Parte Status. We deny Hughes' and DIRECTV's request to modify the ex parte status of this proceeding from restricted to permit-but-disclose. Pursuant to Section 1.1208 of the Commission's Rules, we may determine that a restricted proceeding be conducted according to the permit-but-disclose proceedings, if the proceeding ``involves primarily issues of broadly applicable policy rather than the rights and responsibilities of specific parties....'' As discussed above, our decision in this matter involves a determination of the rights and responsibilities of particular parties under existing policy, rather
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1650A1_Rcd.pdf
  • work out business arrangements with microwave licensees. We also note that because the 29.25-29.5 GHz band is allocatedfor Earth-to-space use by FSS systems,34the potential for interference into GSO FSS from FS is limited.35 12. Request to Modify Ex Parte Status. We deny Hughes' and DIRECTV's request to modify the ex partestatus of this proceeding from restricted to permit-but-disclose.36Pursuant to Section 1.1208 of the Commission's Rules,37we may determine that a restricted proceeding be conducted according to the permit-but-disclose proceedings, if the proceeding "involves primarily issues of broadly applicable policy rather than the rights and responsibilities of specific parties...."38As discussed above, our decision in this matter involves a determination of the rights and responsibilities of particular parties under existing policy, rather than revisiting
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1731A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1731A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1731A1.txt
  • federal court litigation, in light of the All American Order, or Qwest will move the court to dismiss those claims with prejudice.'' Id. at 2. AT&T Corp. v. Business Telecom, Inc., Order on Reconsideration, 16 FCC Rcd 21750 (2001) (``AT&T v. BTI''). Id., 16 FCC Rcd at 21752-53, �� 6-7. Aventure Petition for Reconsideration at 3. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.1208 (Restricted Proceedings). Qwest Petition to Accept Filing at 1. Id. at 3. Commission rule 1.106(b)(1) addresses petitions for reconsideration filed by persons who are not parties to the proceeding. 47 C.F.R. � 1.106(b). It does not speak to non-parties' attempts to file oppositions to petitions for reconsideration. 47 C.F.R. � 1.223(b). See Teleconnect Co. v. The Bell Company of Pennsylvania,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-463A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-463A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-463A1.txt
  • Corp.-Hughes Order''). See Massillon Cable TV, Inc., Application for Review (December 17, 2010). See Fox Sports Net Ohio, LLC, Motion for Extension of Time and Request that Commission Designate Matter as ``Permit-But-Disclose'' (December 22, 2010); Fox Sports Net Ohio, LLC, Opposition (January 13, 2011). See Massillon Cable TV, Inc., Reply (February 4, 2011), at 1 n.1. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.1208. 47 C.F.R. � 1.1200(a). See 47 C.F.R. �1.1206. PUBLIC NOTICE Federal Communications Commission 445 12th St., S.W. Washington, D.C. 20554 News Media Information 202 / 418-0500 Internet: http://www.fcc.gov TTY: 1-888-835-5322 ��PNG r v ��"r�9 I'6� �d�Y�͆aX ���; Wh� �X,�aX���y�]\\.W`h���va6l! �v"]�V�at�������-``````�"m(c)x<��G�<���={-N��J%t�<== �"""x ҍ� � ��(c)���!��'' �R)&� �A�� "���\��v`` � 6� �� O O O �@ , O Z �
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-697A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-697A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-697A1.txt
  • We note that household information based on the 2010 Census will soon be available. If the City believes that effective competition is no longer present within its franchise area, it may file a petition for recertification pursuant to Section 76.916 of the Commission's rules. 47 C.F.R. � 76.916. Ellrod Letter at 1. Horvitz Letter. 47 C.F.R. � 1.1200(a), citing � 1.1208. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.1204(a)(10)(ii). Section 1.1204(a)(10)(ii) of the Commission's rules provides that ``The following types of presentations are exempt from the prohibitions in restricted proceedings . . . The presentation is requested by (or made with the advance approval of) the Commission or staff for the clarification or adduction evidence, or for the resolution of issues, including possible settlement,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-507A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-507A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-507A1.txt
  • further critical national policy goals, that requirement must be tailored as narrowly as possible, to ensure that it does not draw into its reach more services than necessary.''); id. at 4895, � 45 (recognizing that ``the nature of IP-enabled services may well render the rationales animating the regulatory regime that now governs communications services inapplicable here''). See 47 C.F.R. � 1.1208. See id; 47 C.F.R. � 1.1204(a). See 47 C.F.R. � 1.1202(d)(2) (defining ``party'' as ``[a]ny person who files a complaint . . . which shows that the complainant has served it on the subject of the complaint . . . , and the person who is the subject of such a complaint . . . .''). See 47 C.F.R. ��
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-96-1650A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-96-1650A1.txt
  • has formally opposed an application or pioneer's preference request. Ex parte presentations concerning any formally opposed application or request are prohibited." Establishment of Rules and Policies for the Digital Audio Radio Satellite Service in the 2310-2360 MHz Frequency Band. Notice of Proposed Rulemaking hi IB Docket No. 95-91. 11 FCC Red 1, 38 1 123 (1996), citing 47 C.F.R. � 1.1208; see also Establishment of Procedures to Provide a Preference to Applicants Proposing an Allocation for New Services. 6 FCC Red 3488, 3493 ^ 42 (1991). Although no parties have formally opposed (see 47 C.F.R. � 1.1202(e)) any of the pending DARS pioneer's preference requests, pursuant to 47 C.F.R. �� 1.1200(a) and 1.1208(c)(5), we have determined that these adjudicative proceedings should
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-96-1972A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-96-1972A1.txt
  • maximum participation by interested parties. ACISS argues that Comsat's application raises concerns including INTELSAT's role in providing DTK and issues related to INTELSAT's privatization initiatives. Comsat opposes the ACISS's request stating that a modification of the ex pane status would be contrary to the Commission's goal of processing Comsat's application on a fast track schedule. Furthermore, Comsat argues that Section 1.1208 of the Commission's rules provides a procedure for developing a complete record that may be reviewed by a court should the Commission's decision face judicial review.2 Comsat contends that the D.C, Circuit Court of Appeals in HBO v. FCC has stated that even if the Commission were to disclose the substance of an ex pane presentations, the information would lack
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-99-2765A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-99-2765A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-99-2765A1.txt
  • 445 Twelfth Street, S.W., Room CY-A257. Copies may also be obtained from ITS. For further information regarding the public reference file for this Waiver Request contact Maria Ringold, Chief, Wireless Branch, RIC, (202) 418-1350. Unless otherwise provided, requests for waiver of the Commission's Rules are subject to treatment by the Commission as restricted proceedings for ex parte purposes under Section 1.1208 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.1208. Because of the policy implications and potential impact of this proceeding on persons not parties to the waiver request, we believe it would be in the public interest to treat this case as a permit-but-disclose proceeding under the ex parte rules. See Sections 1.1200(a), 1.1206 of the Commission's Rules. 47 C.F.R.�� 1.1200(a),
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-207722A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-207722A1.txt
  • (released July 29, 1998), the applications and letters of intent filed in the 2 GHz Mobile Satellite Service proceeding have been treated on a non-restricted, permit-but-disclose basis for ex parte purposes. The applications and letters of intent, as amended here, will continue to be treated on a non-restricted, permit-but-disclose basis for ex parte purposes. 47 CFR �� 1.1200(a), 1.1206 and 1.1208, Note 2. Comments may be filed on or before December 14, 2000. Replies may be filed on or before December 26, 2000. For more information concerning this Notice, contact Kathleen Campbell at 202-418-0753 or Howard Griboff at 202-418-0657; TTY 202-418-2555. Page 2 of 2
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-219983A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-219983A1.txt
  • in-orbit spare in each plane. Continuous commercial service is anticipated with the launch of the first 12 satellites. The satellites will operate in the 28.6 - 29.1 GHz bands (uplink) and 18.8-19.3 GHz (downlink) frequency bands. NOTE: Ex Parte Status of this Proceeding. The application listed above is restricted under the Commission's ex parte rules. See 47 C.F.R. �� 1.1200, 1.1208. In order to assist the Commission in developing a complete record on which a well-reasoned decision can be made, we hereby redesignate this application proceeding as "permit but disclose." We conclude that such treatment would best serve the public interest in light of the complex legal and technical issues raised by the application. Accordingly, effective today, ex parte presentations in
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-236121A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-236121A1.txt
  • conformance with the Commission's rules or its policies. Petitions, oppositions and other pleadings filed in response to this notice should conform to Section 25.154 of the Commission's rules, unless otherwise noted. 47 C.F.R. � 25.154. Processing of the applications captioned above would generally proceed on a restricted basis under the Commission's ex parte rules. See 47 C.F.R. �� 1.1202(d) and 1.1208. Because these applications present complex, interrelated legal, technical and policy issues associated with the implementation of direct broadcast satellite systems, and because a change in the ex parte status of these applications would facilitate a transparent resolution of these issues, we hereby modify the status for processing these applications. Both applications shall be treated on a non-restricted, permit-but-disclose basis. 47
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-236230A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-236230A1.txt
  • the satellites at those locations. See In the Matter of DIRECTV, Inc, Request for Special Temporary Authority to Move Satellites to the 110� W.L. and 101� W.L. Orbit Locations, DA 03-2327 (released July 2, 2003). The application captioned above is an adjudicative licensing proceeding and is generally restricted under the Commission's ex parte rules. See 47 C.F.R. �� 1.1202(d) and 1.1208. This proceeding is inextricably intertwined with complex, interrelated legal, technical and policy issues associated with the implementation of direct broadcast satellite systems. In order to develop a full and complete record in this proceeding we hereby modify the status for processing this application. This proceeding shall be treated on a non-restricted, permit-but-disclose, basis. 47 C.F.R. �� 1.1200(a), 1.1206 and 1.1208,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-259954A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-259954A1.txt
  • Satellite Services LP Licensee has changed name only, per letter dated May 24, 2005. E950302 SES-MOD-20040702-00943 Westar Satellite Services LP Licensee has changed name only, per letter dated May 24, 2005. E970381 SES-MOD-20050301-00261 Globalstar USA, LLC The application captioned above is a licensing proceeding and is generally restricted under the Commission's ex parte rules. See 47 C.F.R. �� 1.1202(d) and 1.1208. On July 6, 2005, Globalstar LLC and Globalstar USA, LLC filed a request to designate Files Nos. SAT-MOD-20050301-0054 and SES-MOD-20050301-00261, as "permit-but-disclose" under the Commission's ex parte rules. See Letter from William T. Lake, Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr, LLP, Counsel to Globalstar LLC and Globalstar USA LLC to Marlene H. Dortch, Secretary, Federal Communications Commission. The issues raised
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-261431A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-261431A1.txt
  • DirecTV 8 satellite from 100.85� W.L. to 100.75� W.L. as "permit-but-disclose" for purposes of the Commission's rules governing ex parte communications. We find that designating the application as "permit-but-disclose" will facilitate resolution of the complex technical issues raised by the application. Thus, we designate IBFS Files No. SAT-MOD-20050513-00100 as "permit-but-disclose," effective September 30, 2005. 47 C.F.R. �� 1.1200(a), 1.1206 and 1.1208, Note 2. This action is without prejudice to any determination regarding the processing of the application. S2632 SAT-MOD-20050513-00101 DIRECTV Enterprises, LLC On our own motion, we designate the application to reassign the DirecTV 8 satellite from 100.85� W.L. to 100.75� W.L. as "permit-but-disclose" for purposes of the Commission's rules governing ex parte communications. We find that designating the application as
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262218A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262218A1.txt
  • Ventures Subsidiary, LLC on October 13, 2005 (addressing SES-LFS-20051011-01396 filed by FTMSC US, LLC). We find that designating the earth station applications as "permit-but-disclose" will facilitate resolution of the complex policy issues raised by the applications. Thus, we designate IBFS File No. SES-LFS-20050826-01175, SES-AMD-20050922-01313, and SES-LFS-20050930-01352, SES-LFS-20051011-01396 as "permit-but-disclose," effective November 10, 2005. See 47 C.F.R. �� 1.1200(a), 1.1206 and 1.1208, Note 2. This action is without prejudice to any determination regarding the processing of the applications. E050249 SES-LFS-20050826-01175 Stratos Communications, Inc. On November 10, 2005, the Satellite Division granted Mobile Satellite Ventures Subsidiary LLC's requests to designate certain blanket earth station applications that seek authority to operate Mobile Earth Terminals to provide Mobile Satellite Services in the L-band with Inmarsat's
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262935A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262935A1.txt
  • SES-MFS-20051122-01616, SES-MFS-20051122-01617, SES-MFS-20051122-01618, SES-MFS-20051123-01626, SES-MFS-20051123-01627, SES-MFS-20051123-01629, and SES-MFS-20051123-01630). We find that designating the earth station applications as "permit-but-disclose" will facilitate resolution of the complex policy issues raised by the applications. Thus, we designate IBFS File Nos. SES-LFS-20051123-01634, SES-MFS-20051122-01614, SES-MFS-20051122-01615, SES-MFS-20051122-01616, SES-MFS-20051122-01617, SES-MFS-20051122-01618, SES-MFS-20051123-01626, SES-MFS-20051123-01627, SES-MFS-20051123-01629, and SES-MFS-20051123-01630 as "permit-but-disclose," effective December 21, 2005. See 47 C.F.R. �� 1.1200(a), 1.1206 and 1.1208 note 2. This action is without prejudice to any determination regarding the processing of the applications. SITE ID: 1 1000 Inmarsat Mini-M full-duplex METs in the United States LOCATION: NERA (0.26m(w & h)) 1 0.26 meters ANTENNA ID: WORLDPONE 17.00 dBW MINI-M VOICE, DATA AND FAX O-QPSK 1626.5000 - 1660.5000 MHz 5K00G1E 17.00 dBW SIGNALLING BPSK 1626.5000 - 1660.5000 MHz
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-263143A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-263143A1.txt
  • Motion to Designate Proceeding as "Permit-But-Disclose," filed by Mobile Satellite Ventures Subsidiary on December 23, 2005. We find that designating the SkyWave earth station STA application as "permit-but-disclose" will facilitate resolution of the complex policy issues raised by the application. Thus, we designate IBFS File No. SES-STA-20051222-01788 as "permit-but-disclose," effective December 29, 2005. See 47 C.F.R. �� 1.1200(a), 1.1206 and 1.1208 note 2. This action is without prejudice to any determination regarding the processing of the applications. E020074 SES-STA-20051223-01790 SATAMATICS, INC. On December 29, 2005, the Satellite Division granted Mobile Satellite Ventures Subsidiary LLC's request to designate Satamatics, Inc.'s ("Satamatics") earth station application that seeks special temporary authority ("STA") to provide Mobile Satellite Services in the L-band with Inmarsat's 4F2 satellite,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-263406A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-263406A1.txt
  • Mobile Satellite Ventures Subsidiary on January 20, 2006. We find that designating these Telenor earth station applications as "permit-but-disclose" will facilitate resolution of the complex policy issues raised by the applications. Thus, we designate IBFS File Nos. SES-MFS-20060118-00050, SES-MFS-20060118-00051, SES-MFS-20060118-00052, SES-MFS-20060118-00053, SES-STA-20060118-00055, SES-STA-20060118-00056, SES-STA-20060118-00057, SES-STA-20060118-00058, and SES-STA-20060119-00064 as "permit-but-disclose," effective January 24, 2006. See 47 C.F.R. �� 1.1200(a), 1.1206 and 1.1208 note 2. This action is without prejudice to any determination regarding the processing of the applications. E000282 SES-MFS-20060118-00051 Telenor Satellite, Inc. On January 24, 2006, the Satellite Division granted Mobile Satellite Ventures Subsidiary LLC's request to designate Telenor Satellite, Inc.'s ("Telenor") earth station applications that seek authority and special temporary authority ("STA") to provide Mobile Satellite Services in the L-band
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-263704A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-263704A1.txt
  • See Motion to Designate Proceeding as "Permit-But-Disclose," filed by Mobile Satellite Ventures Subsidiary on Februar 1, 2006. We find that designating this Telenor earth station application as "permit-but-disclose" will facilitate resolution of the complex policy issues raised by the application. Thus, we designate IBFS File No. SES-LIC-20060130-00175 as "permit-but-disclose," effective January 24, 2006. See 47 C.F.R. �� 1.1200(a), 1.1206 and 1.1208 note 2. This action is without prejudice to any determination regarding the processing of the application. E930279 SES-RWL-20030206-00139 FALCON VIDEO COMMUNICATIONS, LP Licensee has surrendered license, per letter dated January 23, 2006. Page 6 of 7 For more information concerning this Notice, contact the Satellite and Radiocommunication Division at 418-0719; TTY 202-418-2555. Page 7 of 7
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-263818A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-263818A1.txt
  • Motion to Designate Proceeding as "Permit-But-Disclose," filed by Mobile Satellite Ventures Subsidiary LLC on February 6, 2006. We find that designating this Telenor earth station application as "permit-but-disclose" will facilitate resolution of the complex policy issues raised by the application. Thus, we designate IBFS File No. SES-MFS-20060130-00172 as "permit-but-disclose," effective February 8, 2006. See 47 C.F.R. �� 1.1200(a), 1.1206 and 1.1208 note 2. This action is without prejudice to any determination regarding the processing of the application. SURRENDER E020164 SES-LIC-20020606-00954 AUTOMATION SERVICES GROUP, INC. License has been surrendered per letter dated January 25, 2006. Page 13 of 13
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-264326A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-264326A1.txt
  • to Designate Proceeding as "Permit-But-Disclose," filed by Mobile Satellite Ventures Subsidiary LLC on March 6, 2006. We find that designating this BT Americas earth station application as "permit-but-disclose" will facilitate resolution of the complex policy issues raised by the application. Thus, we designate IBFS File No. SES-LFS-20060303-00343 as "permit-but-disclose," effective March 8, 2006. See 47 C.F.R. �� 1.1200(a), 1.1206 and 1.1208 note 2. This action is without prejudice to any determination regarding the processing of the application. E960148 SES-LIC-19960209-01813 NBC Telemundo License Co. Licensee has surrendered license, per letter dated March 7, 2006. E960204 SES-LIC-19960327-01529 JONES EARTH SEGMENT, INC. Licensee has surrendered license, per letter dated March 2, 2006. E960527 SES-LIC-19960905-00493 Convergent Media Systems Corporation Licensee has surrendered license, per letter
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-264449A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-264449A1.txt
  • Designate Proceeding as "Permit-But-Disclose," filed by Mobile Satellite Ventures Subsidiary LLC on March 14, 2006. We find that designating this Stratos application for special temporary authority as "permit-but-disclose" will facilitate resolution of the complex policy issues raised by the application. Thus, we designate IBFS File No. SES-STA-20060310-00419 as "permit-but-disclose," effective March 16, 2006. See 47 C.F.R. �� 1.1200(a), 1.1206 and 1.1208 note 2. This action is without prejudice to any determination regarding the processing of the application. E050276 SES-STA-20060313-00430 Telenor Satellite, Inc. On March 16, 2006, the Satellite Division granted Mobile Satellite Ventures Subsidiary LLC's request to designate Telenor Satellite Inc.'s ("Telenor") earth station application that seeks special temporary authority to provide Mobile Satellite Services in the L-band with Inmarsat's 4F2
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-264545A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-264545A1.txt
  • to Designate Proceeding as "Permit-But-Disclose," filed by Mobile Satellite Ventures Subsidiary LLC on March 20, 2006. We find that designating this FTMSC application for special temporary authority as "permit-but-disclose" will facilitate resolution of the complex policy issues raised by the application. Thus, we designate IBFS File No.SES-STA-20060314-00438 as "permit-but-disclose," effective March 22, 2006. See 47 C.F.R. �� 1.1200(a), 1.1206 and 1.1208 note 2. This action is without prejudice to any determination regarding the processing of the application. E060076 SES-STA-20060315-00445 BT Americas Inc. On March 22, 2006, the Satellite Division granted Mobile Satellite Ventures Subsidiary LLC's request to designate BT Americas, Inc.'s ("BT America") earth station application that seeks special temporary authority to provide Mobile Satellite Services in the L-band with Inmarsat's
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-265666A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-265666A1.txt
  • to Designate Proceeding as "Permit-But-Disclose," filed by Mobile Satellite Ventures Subsidiary LLC on May 23, 2006. We find that designating these Thrane & Thrane applications as "permit-but-disclose" will facilitate resolution of the complex policy issues raised by the applications. Thus, we designate IBFS File Nos.SES-LFS-20060522-00852 and SES-STA-20060522-00857 as "permit-but-disclose," effective May 30, 2006. See 47 C.F.R. �� 1.1200(a), 1.1206 and 1.1208 note 2. This action is without prejudice to any determination regarding the processing of the application. E030055 SES-STA-20060511-00788 SkyWave Mobile Communications, Corp. On May 30, 2006, the Satellite Division granted Mobile Satellite Ventures Subsidiary LLC's request to designate SkyWave Mobile Communications, Inc.'s ("SkyWave") earth station application that seeks special temporary authority to provide Mobile Satellite Services in the L-band with
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269720A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269720A1.txt
  • ex parte communications. See Motion to Designate Proceeding as "Permit-But-Disclose," filed by Mobile Satellite Ventures Subsidiary LLC on January 10, 2007. We find that designating Horizon's application as "permit-but-disclose" will facilitate resolution of the complex policy issues raised by the application. Thus, we designate File No. SES-LFS-20070109-00042 as "permit-but-disclose," effective January 18, 2007. See 47 C.F.R. �� 1.1200(a), 1.1206 and 1.1208 note 2. This action is without prejudice to any determination regarding the processing of the application. SURRENDER E980157 SES-LIC-19980225-00229 Loral Skynet Network Services, Inc. This license is hereby surrendered per Loral Skynet's request. Please see a letter filed by Mr. Nelson De Sousa on December 12, 2006. E2124 SES-RWL-20000505-00753 C-NATIVE EXCHANGE III, LP Licensee has surrendered license, per letter dated
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-272809A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-272809A1.txt
  • Ku-Bands to the Vehicle Mounted Earth Station Satellite Service (VMES) on a Shared Primary Basis and to Adopt Licensing and Service Rules for VMES Operations in the Ku- and Extended Ku-Bands, Petition for Rulemaking, RM No. 11336 (filed May 24, 2006). Thus, we designate File No. SES-LIC-20060629-01083 as "permit-but-disclose," effective May 1, 2007. See 47 C.F.R. �� 1.1200(a), 1.1206 and 1.1208 note 2. This action is without prejudice to any determination regarding the processing of the application. Page 30 of 30
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-275999A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-275999A1.txt
  • ex parte communications. See Motion to Designate Proceeding as "Permit-But-Disclose," filed by Horizon Mobile Communications Inc. on August 7, 2007. We find that designating Horizon's application as "permit-but-disclose" will facilitate resolution of the complex policy issues raised by the application. Thus, we designate IBFS File No. SES-STA-20070112-00112 as "permit-but-disclose," effective August 14, 2007. See 47 C.F.R. �� 1.1200(a), 1.1206 and 1.1208 note 2. This action is without prejudice to any determination regarding the processing of the application. Points of Communication: E060382 SES-STA-20070709-00908 E Date Effective: 08/10/2007 Class of Station: Grant of Authority Special Temporary Authority HNS License Sub, LLC Special Temporary Authority is GRANTED with condition for a period of 30 days beginning August 14, 2007 and ending September 13, 2007.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-277412A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-277412A1.txt
  • See Motion to Designate Proceeding as "Permit-But-Disclose," filed by Inmarsat Ventures Limited on October 1, 2007. We find that designating this Vizada earth station application as "permit-but-disclose" will facilitate resolution of the complex policy issues raised by the application. Thus, we designate the above-captioned earth station application as "permit-but-disclose," effective October 9, 2007. See 47 C.F.R. �� 1.1200(a), 1.1206 and 1.1208 note 2. This action is without prejudice to any determination regarding the processing of the application. E070144 SES-LIC-20070712-00933 iPass Inc. On October 9, 2007, the Satellite Division granted Inmarsat Ventures Limited's request to designate iPass, Inc.'s ("iPass") earth station application that seeks authority to provide Mobile Satellite Services in the L-band with Inmarsat's 4F2 satellite, to be located at 52.75�
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-277996A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-277996A1.txt
  • communications. See Motion to Designate Proceeding as "Permit-But-Disclose," filed by Satamatics, Inc., on October 11, 2007. We find that designating this Satamatics earth station application as "permit-but-disclose" will facilitate resolution of the complex policy issues raised by the application. Thus, we designate the above-captioned earth station application as "permit-but-disclose," effective October 31, 2007. See 47 C.F.R. �� 1.1200(a), 1.1206 and 1.1208 note 2. This action is without prejudice to any determination regarding the processing of the application. E050284 SES-STA-20071017-01429 VIZADA Services LLC On October 31, 2007, the Satellite Division granted the request of VIZADA Services LLC (VIZADA) to designate its earth station application that seeks special temporary authority ("STA") to provide Mobile Satellite Services in the L-band with Inmarsat's 4F2 satellite,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-278144A1.pdf
  • See Motion to Designate Proceeding as "Permit-But-Disclose," filed by Deere & Company, on November 7, 2007. We find that designating this Deere earth station application as "permit-but-disclose" will facilitate resolution of the complex policy issues raised by the application. Thus, we designate the above-captioned earth station application as "permit-but-disclose," effective November 8, 2007. See 47 C.F.R. �� 1.1200(a), 1.1206 and 1.1208 note 2. This action is without prejudice to any determination regarding the processing of the application. Page 5 of 5
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-278326A1.pdf
  • See Motion to Designate Proceeding as "Permit-But-Disclose," filed by Deere & Company, on November 9, 2007. We find that designating this Deere earth station application as "permit-but-disclose" will facilitate resolution of the complex policy issues raised by the application. Thus, we designate the above-captioned earth station application as "permit-but-disclose," effective November 16, 2007. See 47 C.F.R. �� 1.1200(a), 1.1206 and 1.1208 note 2. This action is without prejudice to any determination regarding the processing of the application. E000282 SES-STA-20070905-01233 Vizada Satellite, Inc. The FCC has taken the administrative action of listing this request as granted. The request sought continuation of operations authorized in File No. SES-STA-20060118-00056. That authorization was for 1000 Inmarsat Mini-M Terminals. The stations operated during the requested period
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-278442A1.pdf
  • Motion to Designate Proceeding as "Permit-But-Disclose," filed by SkyWave Mobile Communications, Corp., on November 13, 2007. We find that designating this SkyWave earth station application as "permit-but-disclose" will facilitate resolution of the complex policy issues raised by the application. Thus, we designate the above-captioned earth station application as "permit-but-disclose," effective November 21, 2007. See 47 C.F.R. �� 1.1200(a), 1.1206 and 1.1208 note 2. This action is without prejudice to any determination regarding the processing of the application. SURRENDER E000329 SES-MOD-20070912-01273 CLEAR CHANNEL SATELLITE SERVICES Licensee has surrendered this recently granted modification and request that their call sign E000329 be rolled back to the previous file number SES-MOD-20060420-00696, per letter dated November 15, 2007. E4774 SES-RWL-20020801-01217 CoxCom,Inc Licensee has surrendered license per
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-278705A1.pdf
  • Motion to Designate Proceeding as "Permit-But-Disclose," filed by MVS USA, Inc., on November 16, 2007. We find that designating this MVS USA earth station application as "permit-but-disclose" will facilitate resolution of the complex policy issues raised by the application. Thus, we designate the above-captioned earth station application as "permit-but-disclose," effective November 28, 2007. See 47 C.F.R. �� 1.1200(a), 1.1206 and 1.1208 note 2. This action is without prejudice to any determination regarding the processing of the application. SURRENDER E020082 SES-REG-20020322-00471 Cox Communications, Inc Licensee has surrendered license, per letter dated December 4, 2007. KN66 SES-RWL-20020118-00041 Cox Communications, Inc Licensee has surrendered license, per letter dated December 4, 2007. Page 18 of 19 For more information concerning this Notice, contact the Satellite
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-282440A1.pdf
  • the Request that the other parties to the proceeding were aware of the Request and had no objection to it. We find that designating this application proceeding as "permit-but-disclose" will facilitate resolution of the complex policy issues raised by the application. We therefore designate the above-captioned proceeding as "permit-but-disclose," effective May 20, 2008. See 47 C.F.R. �� 1.1200(a), 1.1206 and 1.1208 note 2. This action is without prejudice to any determination regarding the processing of the application. E060430 SES-AMD-20070907-01253 TerreStar Networks Inc. On May 20, 2008, the Policy Branch granted the request of TerreStar Networks Inc. (TerreStar) to designate the proceeding pertaining to its application for authority for operation of Ancillary Terrestrial Component facilities in portions of the 2 GHz Mobile
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-284903A1.pdf
  • Dortch, Secretary, Federal Communications Commission, from Paul Moller, VP, Intellicom Technologies, Inc., Consultant to L-3 Communications, dated August 14, 2008. We find that designating this matter as "permit-but-disclose" will facilitate the resolution of complex policy issues raised in the application. We, therefore, designate the above captioned proceeding as "permit-but-disclose" effective August 26, 2008. See 47 C.F.R. �� 1.1200(a), 1.1206, and 1.1208 note 2. This action is without prejudice to any determination regarding the processing of the application. E050284 SES-STA-20080612-00770 VIZADA Services LLC The FCC has taken the administrative action of listing this request as granted. The request sought continuation of operations authorized in File No. SES-STA-20061006-01820. The stations operated during the requested period pursuant to Section 1.62 of the Commission's rules,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-285595A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-285595A1.txt
  • for purposes of the Commission's rules governing ex parte communications. IBFS File Nos. SES-LIC-20080508-00570, SES-AMD-20080619-00826, SES-STA-20080711-00928, SES-STA-20080811-01049, SES-AMD-20080819-01074, SES-AMD-20080829-01117, and SES-STA-20080903-01141. (Call Sign: E080100). In order to develop a full and complete record on these applications, the Satellite Division concludes that the public interest will be served by designating these applications as "permit-but-disclose." See 47 C.F.R. �� 1.1200(a), 1.1206 and 1.1208 note 2. This action is without prejudice to any action on these applications. E080100 SES-AMD-20080819-01074 Row 44 Inc. On September 19, 2008, the Satellite Division, on its own motion, designated the following applications as "permit-but-disclose" for purposes of the Commission's rules governing ex parte communications. IBFS File Nos. SES-LIC-20080508-00570, SES-AMD-20080619-00826, SES-STA-20080711-00928, SES-STA-20080811-01049, SES-AMD-20080819-01074, SES-AMD-20080829-01117, and SES-STA-20080903-01141. (Call Sign: E080100). In
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-291175A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-291175A1.txt
  • Application for Consent to Transfer of Control WLKY Hearst-Argyle Television, Inc. INFORMATIVE E030120 SES-ASG-20090403-00406 SkyWave Mobile Communications, Corp. The application captioned above was accepted for filing on April 29, 2009. See Report No. SES-01133. As an application for authority under Title III of the Communications Act, it is generally restricted under the Commission's ex parte rules. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.1208. In order to develop a full and complete record in this proceeding, the Bureau concludes that the public interest will be served by designating this proceeding as "permit-but-disclose" for purposes of the Commission's rules governing ex parte communications. 47 C.F.R. �� 1.1200(a) and 1.1206. This action is without prejudice to any determination regarding the processing of the application. Page 32
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-293232A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-293232A1.txt
  • certain frequencies in the L-band as "permit-but-disclose" for purposes of the Commission's rules governing ex parte communications. We find that designating these proceedings as "permit-but-disclose" will facilitate resolution of the complex policy issues raised by the applications. Thus, we designate IBFS File Nos. SAT-MOD-20090813-00088, SAT-MOD-20090813-00089, and SES-MOD-20090813-00997 as "permit-but-disclose," effective August 21, 2009. See 47 C.F.R. �� 1.1200(a), 1.1206 and 1.1208 note 2. This action is without prejudice to any determination regarding the processing of these applications. SURRENDER E8331 SES-RWL-20050208-00156 SES Americom, Inc. Licensee has surrendered license, per letter dated August 25, 2009. Page 24 of 24
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-294136A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-294136A1.txt
  • motion of SkyTerra Subsidiary LLC to designate the following applications to modify SkyTerra's authority to operate its current and future mobile satellite service systems using certain frequencies in the L-band as "permit-but-disclose" for purposes of the Commission's rules governing ex parte communications, effective October 15, 2009: IBFS File Nos. SAT-MOD-20090429-00046, SAT-MOD-20090429-00047, and SES-MOD-20090429-00536. See 47 C.F.R. �� 1.1200(a), 1.1206 and 1.1208 note 2. We find that designating these proceedings as "permit-but-disclose" will facilitate resolution of the complex policy issues raised by the applications. This action is without prejudice to any determination regarding the processing of these applications. SURRENDER E020159 SES-LIC-20020531-00929 KAZH License, LLC Licensee has surrendered receive only earth station registration per letter dated October 16, 2009. E090075 SES-LIC-20090420-00514 GCI Communication
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-300397A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-300397A1.txt
  • Satellite Services G.P., Debtor-in-Possession On July 22, 2010, the Satellite Division granted the request of Sprint Nextel Corporation to designate the above-captioned proceeding as "permit-but-disclose" for purposes of the Commission's rules governing ex parte communications, effective July 22, 2010. We find that designating this proceeding as "permit-but-disclose" will facilitate communications with the parties. See 47 C.F.R. �� 1.1200(a), 1.1206 and 1.1208 note 2. E070290 SES-T/C-20091211-01576 New DBSD Satellite Services G.P., Debtor-in-Possession On July 22, 2010, the Satellite Division granted the request of Sprint Nextel Corporation to designate the above-captioned proceeding as "permit-but-disclose" for purposes of the Commission's rules governing ex parte communications, effective July 22, 2010. We find that designating this proceeding as "permit-but-disclose" will facilitate communications with the parties. See
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-304275A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-304275A1.txt
  • been granted on January 25, 2011. INFORMATIVE E100089 SES-AMD-20100914-01163 Panasonic Avionics Corporation On January 25, 2011, the Satellite Division designated the above-captioned proceeding as "permit-but-disclose" for purposes of the Commission's rules governing ex parte communications, effective January 25, 2011. We find that designating this proceeding as "permit-but-disclose" will facilitate communications with the parties. See 47 C.F.R. �� 1.1200(a), 1.1206 and 1.1208 note 2. E100089 SES-LIC-20100805-00992 Panasonic Avionics Corporation On January 25, 2011, the Satellite Division designated the above-captioned proceeding as "permit-but-disclose" for purposes of the Commission's rules governing ex parte communications, effective January 25, 2011. We find that designating this proceeding as "permit-but-disclose" will facilitate communications with the parties. See 47 C.F.R. �� 1.1200(a), 1.1206 and 1.1208 note 2. E100089 SES-STA-20110104-00005
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-305790A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-305790A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-305790A1.txt
  • R&O as indicated below: 1. In the Table of Contents, the Ordering Clauses heading is updated to change the paragraph number from 91 to 93. 2. Paragraph 86 is corrected to read as follows: 86. Paperwork Reduction Act. The amendments to Section 1.1206(b) (with the exception of the technical amendment to Section 1.1206(b)(2), as provided at paragraph 76(vi)) and Section 1.1208 contain new or modified information collection requirements subject to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (PRA), Public Law 104-13. These amendments will be submitted to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for review under Section 3507(j) of the PRA. OMB, the general public, and other Federal agencies are invited to comment on the modified information collection requirements contained in
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-311171A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-311171A1.txt
  • Transfer of Control NTELOS MEDIA INC. INFORMATIVE E010011 SES-LIC-20010112-00051 DEERE & COMPANY On November 9, 2011, the Satellite Division designated the above-captioned proceeding as "permit-but-disclose" for purposes of the Commission's rules governing ex parte communications, effective November 9, 2011. We find that designating this proceeding as "permit-but-disclose" will facilitate communications with the parties. See 47 C.F.R. �� 1.1200(a), 1.1206 and 1.1208 note 2. Page 15 of 15
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-311624A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-311624A1.txt
  • to Transfer of Control VIZADA, INC. CORRECTIONS E010011 SES-RWL-20110908-01047 Deere & Company On November 9, 2011, the Satellite Division designated the above-captioned proceeding as "permit-but-disclose" for purposes of the Commission's rules governing ex parte communications, effective November 9, 2011. We find that designating this proceeding as "permit-but-disclose" will facilitate communications with the parties. See 47 C.F.R. �� 1.1200(a), 1.1206 and 1.1208 note 2. This notice corrects a prior informative released on November 23, 2011, which referenced an incorrect file number. See Public Notice, Report No. SES-01400. Dismissal E110165 SES-STA-20111208-01434 NBC Telemundo License LLC STA application has been dismissed as moot, because underlying application SES-LIC-20111104-01327, has been granted. E110161 SES-STA-20111208-01435 NBC Telemundo License LLC STA application has been dismissed as moot, because
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-109A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-109A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-109A1.txt
  • denying Global Link's Request to Permit Ex Parte Presentations in this proceeding. Philippine Long Distance Tel. Co. v. USA Global Link, Inc., 12 FCC Rcd 22039 (Com. Car. Bur. 1997). We note that a section 208 complaint proceeding is treated as a restricted proceeding from the day on which the matter is filed with the Commission. See 47 C.F.R. �� 1.1208. The Bureau hardly exceeded its discretion in complying with the rule. Furthermore, our decision denying Global Link's Application for Review effectively renders moot Global Link's Ex Parte Application for Review. See Global Link Order, 12 FCC Rcd at 12011. Although several configurations of call-back are currently in use, "uncompleted call signalling" is the only configuration that was at issue in
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-194A1.doc
  • a September 27, 1999 meeting (to which it was not invited) between representatives of U S West and Commission staff. Specifically, TSR claims that U S West made oral and written presentations to Commission staff that discussed ``all aspects of LEC-paging interconnection - not just the issue of the `applicability of reciprocal compensation to paging carriers[,]''' in violation of section 1.1208. TSR also contends that U S West's June 1, 1999 letter notifying the Commission of the ex parte presentations concerning the May 26 meeting was filed late and failed to reference TSR's formal complaint proceeding. U S West maintains that its ex parte presentations were permissible under the ex parte rules. . We conclude that U S West's presentations concerning
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-391A1.doc
  • affected Cumulus' basic qualifications. Davis also states that the decision ``must be the product of ex parte communications.'' We note in this regard that any ex parte communications between the Commission and the applicants were permissible in the Midwest proceeding until September 11, 2000, when Davis filed its informal objection and served it on the applicants. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.1208, Note 1 Examples. In any event, Davis has pointed to no communication that would have been improper under the ex parte rules, and we are aware of none. See, e.g., Solar LMA, �� 3, 5.1, and Appendix A. We expect the parties to remove or reform any provision that they have reason to believe would be unacceptable to the Commission
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-392A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-392A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-392A1.txt
  • C.F.R. � 1.1202(b). In general, the nature of the proceeding determines the permissibility of ex parte presentations. In exempt proceedings, ex parte presentations are generally permitted, in permit-but-disclose proceedings, ex parte presentations to decisions-makers are permitted but must be disclosed, and in restricted proceedings, ex parte presentations both to and by decision-makers are prohibited. 47 C.F.R. �� 1.1200, 1.1204, 1.1206, 1.1208. the Government of Canada Regarding the Application of Their Competition and Deceptive Marketing Practices Laws, August __, 1995, U.S. - Canada, T.I.A.S. No. _______; Agreement Between the Government of the United States of America and the Government of the Federal Republic of Germany Relating to Mutual Cooperation Regarding Restrictive Business Practices, June 23, 1976, U.S. - Germany, T.I.A.S. No. 8291;
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-418A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-418A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-418A1.txt
  • a secondary, non-interfering basis to DBS services and on a co-primary basis with any new FSS entering the subject frequency band. On March 11, 1999, the Bureau sought comment on Northpoint's request for waiver. Requests for waiver of the Commission's Rules are subject, unless otherwise provided, to treatment by the Commission as restricted proceedings for ex parte purposes under Section 1.1208 of our Rules. In this case, ``because of the policy implications and the potential impact of this proceeding on other proceedings, as well as, persons not parties to the waiver requests'' the Bureau decided to treat the matter as a permit-but-disclose proceeding under the ex parte rules. Subsequently, on April 18, 2000, Pegasus filed a waiver request and application for
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-21A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-21A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-21A1.txt
  • rule change is necessary to facilitate the efficient and expeditious discharge of the Commission's statutory responsibility in the Virginia arbitration proceeding pursuant to section 252 of the Communications Act. B. Other Procedural Issues 7. Ex Parte Classification. Arbitrations conducted pursuant to section 252(e)(5) are restricted for ex parte purposes, consistent with the Commission's ex parte rules. See 47 CFR �� 1.1208, 1.1204(b), 1.1206(a) (1999). Therefore, ex parte presentations are prohibited. Delegated Authority. The Commission's existing arbitration rules contemplate that someone other than the full Commission may serve as arbitrator on behalf of the Commission. See 47 C.F.R. � 51.807(d) (1999). Consistent with that rule, we authorize the Chief, Common Carrier Bureau, to serve as the arbitrator in section 252(e)(5) proceedings, with
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-285A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-285A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-285A1.txt
  • Sprint to Joint Motion, File Nos. EB-01-MD-001, 002 (filed Aug. 10, 2001) at 2 (noting that ``[a]ll three parties to this proceeding have elected to seek judicial review of the [BTI] Order in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit''). 47 C.F.R. � 1.1202(a). 47 C.F.R. � 1.1202(b). 47 C.F.R. �� 1.1202(c), 1.1206. 47 C.F.R. �� 1.1208, 1.1204. 47 U.S.C. � 208. 47 C.F.R. �� 1.1208, 1.1206, 1.1204. See, e.g., Letter from Alexander P. Starr, Chief, Market Disputes Resolution Division, Enforcement Bureau, to James F. Bendernagel, Counsel for AT&T, Jonathan E. Canis, Counsel for BTI, and Cheryl A. Tritt, Counsel for Sprint, File Nos. EB-01-MD-001, 002 (Jan. 18, 2001). 47 C.F.R. �� 1.1202, 1.1208. See, e.g., Letter
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-107A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-107A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-107A1.txt
  • request of the Bureau. Qwest's responses included correspondence dated January 10, 15, and 31, and February 3 and 11, 2003. Qwest provided further information in correspondence dated March 11, 2003 and in response to questions from the staff. Because of the nexus between the formal complaints and the Investigation, the Bureau treated the Investigation as a restricted proceeding under section 1.1208 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.1208. As a result, the Bureau included Touch America in correspondence between Qwest and the Commission. Pursuant to section 1.1204(a)(10) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.1204(a)(10), the Commission and Qwest conducted bi-lateral settlement discussions. All of the information provided by Qwest during those settlement discussions ``relat[ed] to how a proceeding should
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-121A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-121A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-121A1.txt
  • as to timeliness. Nor does it constitute a determination that such person has any other procedural rights, such as the right to intervene in hearing proceedings.'' Id. � 1.1202, Note 3 to paragraph (d). TPS Utilicom further argues that section 1.1202(d)(1) is applicable because the Bureau recognized Alaska Native Wireless' applications and TPS Utilicom's Petition as a proceeding under section 1.1208 of the Commission's rules. 47 C.F.R. � 1.1208 (prohibiting ``ex parte presentations . . . to or from Commission decision-making personnel'' in restricted proceedings). Again, application of the Commission's ex parte rules does not establish standing for purposes of a petition to deny. See May 1, 2002 Alaska Native Wireless Letter at 1-2. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.115(d) (stating that
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-114A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-114A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-114A1.txt
  • deny the WWOR-TV renewal application. The Tri-State ``Like It Is'' Support Coalition filed an informal objection to the WWOR-TV renewal application. In addition, a number of public comments on both renewal applications have been filed. Applications for renewal of broadcast licenses are subject, unless otherwise provided, to treatment by the Commission as restricted proceedings for ex parte purposes under Section 1.1208 of the Commission's rules. See 47 C.F.R. �1.1208. We have concluded, however, that classifying this proceeding as permit-but-disclose would, in this case, permit broader public participation and thereby serve the public interest. Accordingly, by this Public Notice, and pursuant to Section 1.1200(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �1.1200(a), we announce that the ex parte procedures applicable to permit-but-disclose proceedings
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-11A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-11A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-11A1.txt
  • Comcast-AT&T proceeding as permit-but-disclose); Public Notice, 15 FCC Rcd. 5699 (2000) (designating the AOL-Time Warner proceeding as permit-but-disclose); 14 FCC Rcd. 11867 (1999) (designating the AT&T-MediaOne proceeding as permit-but-disclose)). See 47 C.F.R. � 1.1206. See, e.g., n.32, supra. Reply at 2-3. See also Opposition at 18 (Applicants' reference to the classification of previous proceedings as permit-but-disclose). See 47 C.F.R. � 1.1208 n. 2. See Public Notice, General Motors Corporation, Hughes Electronics Corporation, And The News Corporation Limited Seek Approval To Transfer Control Of FCC Authorizations And Licenses Held By Hughes Electronics Corporation To The News Corporation Limited, 18 FCC Rcd 10450, 10452 (2003). An ex parte presentation is any communication (spoken or written) directed to the merits or outcome of a
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-09-97A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-09-97A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-09-97A1.txt
  • section 1.1200(a) of the Commission's Rules, announced that this proceeding would be governed by permit-but-disclose ex parte procedures that are applicable to proceedings under section 1.1206 of the Commission's Rules. On January 15, 2009, Cellular South filed a petition for reconsideration objecting to the ex parte status of the proceeding, asserting that the Bureau's decision was a violation of section 1.1208 of the Commission's Rules and Section 309(d) of the Communications Act, as well as procedural and due process rights. We disagree. In what otherwise would be a restricted proceeding under section 1.1208, the Commission and its staff have the discretion to apply permit-but-disclose ex parte procedures under section 1.1206 if the agency or its staff determine that the proceeding ``involves
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-09-97A1_Rcd.pdf
  • its authority under section 1.1200(a) of the Commission's Rules,512announced that this proceeding would be governed by permit-but-disclose ex parteprocedures that are applicable to proceedings under section 1.1206 of the Commission's Rules.513 On January 15, 2009, Cellular South filed a petition for reconsideration objecting to the ex partestatus of the proceeding, asserting that the Bureau's decision was a violation of section 1.1208 of the Commission's Rules and Section 309(d) of the Communications Act, as well as procedural and due process rights.514 154. We disagree. In what otherwise would be a restricted proceeding under section 1.1208, the Commission and its staff have the discretion to apply permit-but-disclose ex parteprocedures under section 1.1206 if the agency or its staff determine that the proceeding "involves
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-116A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-116A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-116A1.txt
  • 1.1200(a) of the Commission's Rules, announced that this proceeding would be governed by permit-but-disclose ex parte procedures that are applicable to proceedings under section 1.1206 of the Commission's Rules. On July 20, 2009, Cellular South filed a petition for expedited reconsideration objecting to the ex parte status of the proceeding, asserting that the Bureau's decision was a violation of section 1.1208 of the Commission's Rules and section 309(d) of the Communications Act, as well as procedural and due process rights. Discussion. The Commission has recently addressed many of the same claims made by Cellular South in the AT&T-Centennial Order. In that order, we concluded that, in what otherwise would be a restricted proceeding under section 1.1208, the Commission and its staff
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-116A1_Rcd.pdf
  • its authority under section 1.1200(a) of the Commission's Rules,536announced that this proceeding would be governed by permit-but-disclose ex parteprocedures that are applicable to proceedings under section 1.1206 of the Commission's Rules.537On July 20, 2009, Cellular South filed a petition for expedited reconsideration objecting to the ex partestatus of the proceeding, asserting that the Bureau's decision was a violation of section 1.1208 of the Commission's Rules and section 309(d) of the Communications Act, as well as procedural and due process rights.538 155. Discussion. The Commission has recently addressed many of the same claims made by Cellular South in the AT&T-Centennial Order.539In that order, we concluded that, in what otherwise would be a restricted proceeding under section 1.1208, the Commission and its staff
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-31A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-31A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-31A1.txt
  • of a public notice that a matter has been placed on the Sunshine Agenda until the Commission: ***** (c) Nothing in this section prevents a party from submitting a written ex parte presentation or a memorandum summarizing an oral ex parte presentation on the first business day of the Sunshine period prohibition to the extent that � 1.1206 or � 1.1208 requires submission of such a presentation or memorandum to reflect an ex parte presentation that was made on the last day before the beginning of the Sunshine period. 4. Section 1.1204 is amended by revising paragraphs (a)(6), (a)(12)(iii), and (a)(12)(iv), and adding new paragraphs (a)(12)(v) and (a)(12)(vi) to read as follows: � 1.1204 Exempt ex parte presentations and proceedings. (a)
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-86A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-86A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-86A1.txt
  • 308, 309, and section 0.331 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 0.331, that the Wireless Telecommunications Bureau SHALL HOLD the already-filed competing applications, specified above and in Appendix C, in abeyance until the conclusion of this proceeding. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to section 4(j) of the Communications Act of 1934, 47 U.S.C. � 154(j), and sections 1.1200(a) and 1.1208 note 2 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.1200(a) and 1.1208 note 2, that the ex parte status of the pending renewal applications and already-filed competing applications, specified above and in Appendix C, is modified from restricted to permit-but-disclose. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to section 4(i) of the Communications Act of 1934, 47 U.S.C. � 154(i), that the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-86A1_Rcd.pdf
  • send a copy of their filings in this proceeding via emailor U.S. mailto: Richard Arsenault, Chief Counsel, Mobility Division, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau, richard.arsenault@fcc.gov, and Michael Connelly, Attorney Advisor, Mobility Division, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau, michael.connelly@fcc.gov, 445 12thStreet, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20554. Parties should also provide one copy of their filings to the Commission's copy contractor, Best Copy and 319See47 C.F.R. � 1.1208. 320A list of the pending applications covered by this change in the ex partestatus is attached as Appendix C. 321See generally47 C.F.R. �� 1.1202, 1.1203, 1.1206. 322See47 C.F.R. � 1.1206(b)(2). 323See Electronic Filing of Documents in Rulemaking Proceedings, 63 FR 24121 (1998). 7040 Federal Communications Commission FCC 10-86 Printing, Inc. (BCPI), Portals II, Room CY-B402, 445 12thStreet, S.W., Washington, D.C.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-148A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-148A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-148A1.txt
  • the Commission has held that ``to grant non-party requests to reconsider Commission adjudicatory orders based upon the [precedential effect of an adjudicatory order] would open the `floodgates' to non-party participation in adjudicatory proceedings, and thus effectively convert every adjudicatory proceeding into a rulemaking proceeding.'' Id. at 21753, � 7 (citations omitted). Aventure Petition at 5. See 47 C.F.R. �� 1.1202(b), 1.1208. See http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/mdrd/c208.html. We note that Aventure does not claim that it lacked awareness of this proceeding. Indeed, counsel for Aventure and counsel for Northern Valley are partners on the twelve-person ``Telecommunications Team'' in the same law firm. See http://www.arentfox.com/practices/telecom/index.cfm?fa=team. (continued...) Federal Communications Commission FCC 11-148 Federal Communications Commission FCC 11-148 o t  � � � ' � � �
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-16A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-16A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-16A1.txt
  • U.S.C. � 3518 and providing that exemption ``applies during the entire course of the investigation, audit, or action, whether before or after formal charges or complaints are filed or formal administrative action is initiated, but only after a case file or equivalent is opened with respect to a particular party''). See 47 C.F.R. � 0.459. See generally 47 C.F.R. �� 1.1208 (rules applicable to restricted proceedings), 1.1212 (procedures for handling prohibited ex parte presentations). MAP Comments at 2. See 47 U.S.C. � 208; 47 C.F.R. �� 1.720 et seq. See 47 U.S.C. � 224; 47 C.F.R. �� 1.1401 et seq. See 47 U.S.C. � 222; 47 C.F.R. �� 64.2001 et seq. See 47 C.F.R. �� 76.7 et seq. See id. ��
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-181A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-181A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-181A1.txt
  • served on the prospective applicant. Oppositions will be due 10 calendar days after expiration of the time for filing Requests. Replies will be due 5 business days after expiration of the time for filing oppositions. Oppositions and replies must be served on the parties to the proceeding. Proceedings involving environmental submissions for a specific structure are restricted proceedings under Section 1.1208 of the Commission's rules. Information presented to the Bureau must be served on all parties pursuant to Section 1.1202(d) of the Commission's rules. Disposition of Filings without EAs After completion of the 30-day notice period and after reviewing any Requests, the Commission staff will notify the applicant whether an EA is required under Section 1.1307(c) or (d) of its rules.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-181A1_Rcd.pdf
  • 10 calendar days after expiration of the time for filing Requests. Replies will be due 5 business days after expiration of the timefor filing oppositions. Oppositions and replies must be served on the parties to the proceeding. 3Seeamended rule section 17.4(c)(1)(C). 16754 Federal Communications Commission FCC 11-181 Proceedings involving environmental submissions for a specific structure are restricted proceedings under Section 1.1208 of the Commission's rules. Information presented to the Bureau must be served on all parties pursuant to Section 1.1202(d) of the Commission's rules. V.Disposition of Filings without EAs After completion of the 30-day notice period and after reviewing any Requests, the Commission staff will notify the applicant whether an EA is required under Section 1.1307(c) or (d) of its rules.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-20A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-20A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-20A1.txt
  • admonish the applicants to comply with the ex parte rules on a going forward basis, and caution that future violations will be referred to the Office of General Counsel for further action . . . . '' See id. at 2. See Opposition at 3. See Reply at 3. See id. See Further Opposition at 1-2. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.1208 (proceedings not otherwise classified are restricted). See id. See id. � 1.1202(d)(1) (defining as a party any person filing a written submission referencing a pending filing and served on the filer). MSTV's response to Marcus's Complaint indicates that the response was served on Marcus. See Letter from Jennifer Johnson and Jodi Steiger to Mr. Joel Kaufman, Associate General Counsel (May
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-77A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-77A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-77A1.txt
  • AFR at 2. See 098 Request at 2-3. website, much less that the construction of the website (as distinct from the Commission's substantive open Internet policy) is a matter of ``wide public attention.'' AFR at 2. Judicial Watch III, 185 F. Supp. 2d at 60. 47 C.F.R. � 0.470(e). See 47 C.F.R. �� 1.1200-1.1216. See id. �� 1.1206 (permit-but-disclose proceedings), 1.1208 (restricted proceedings); see also id. � 1.1204 (proceedings exempt from ex parte filing requirements). Id. � 0.470(e). See Letter from Kenneth F. Boehm, Chairman to Joel Kaufman, Associate General Counsel (Apr. 7, 2010) (Contingent AFR). We refer to NLPC's application for review as ``contingent'' because, as we explain infra, it is expressly contingent on whether the decisions below are construed
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-96-259A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-96-259A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-96-259A1.txt
  • inspection during regular business hours in the Federal Communications Commission, Reference Center, Room 239, 1919 M Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20554. 31. This is a rulemaking proceeding to develop policies for the assignment of spectrum but because the Commission also proposes to modify a license, this proceeding is also an adjudication. Pursuant to Section 1.1200(a) of the Commission's Rules, Section 1.1208 detailing the ex parte procedures for adjudicatory proceedings is waived. The entire proceeding both, rulemaking and adjudication, shall be treated as "non-restricted" for ex parte purposes in order to assist the Commission in developing a more complete record on which a well-reasoned decision can be made. 47 C.F. R. �� 1.1200(a) and 1.1206. Ex parte presentations are permitted, except during
• http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1997/fcc97387.pdf http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1997/fcc97387.wp
  • to the SMS; and (v) that the BOCs did not have proper authorization from the Commission before constructing the SMS in violation of Section 214(a) of the Act. Id. at 10563. See Notice of Formal Complaint, File No. E-94-57 (Com. Car. Bur. Enf. Div., Apr. 21, 1994); 47 15 C.F.R. � 1.735(d). Notice of Formal Complaint, supra; 47 C.F.R. � 1.1208. 16 Letter from Russell D. Lukas to William F. Caton, Acting Secretary, FCC, dated May 2, 1994, File 17 No. E-94-57 ("Lukas Letter"). The docket indicates that this letter was served on the Commission by mail, and was received on May 6, 1994. This letter also indicates that it was served by mail on the parties to the tariff investigation
• http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/fcc99181.pdf http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/fcc99181.txt http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/fcc99181.wp
  • the public interest. For example, the staff could designate an informal complaint as either "restricted" (which would mean that ex parte munications would be strictly prohibited) or non-restricted (ex parte communications are permitted but must be fully disclosed to the Commission other parties to the proceeding) if deemed in the public interest. See 47 C.F.R. 1.1200-1.1208. 336 See 47 U.S.C. 1.1208. 337 Id. As we noted above, our ex parte rules specifically authorize the Commission or its staff to apply different ex parte procedures in particular s if deemed in the public interest. Federal Communications Commission FCC 99-181 71 to the Commission's attention, the staff will be poised to pursue the matter on its own motion and, when warranted, take or
• http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Orders/2000/fcc00418.doc http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Orders/2000/fcc00418.pdf http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Orders/2000/fcc00418.txt
  • a secondary, non-interfering basis to DBS services and on a co-primary basis with any new FSS entering the subject frequency band. On March 11, 1999, the Bureau sought comment on Northpoint's request for waiver. Requests for waiver of the Commission's Rules are subject, unless otherwise provided, to treatment by the Commission as restricted proceedings for ex parte purposes under Section 1.1208 of our Rules. In this case, ``because of the policy implications and the potential impact of this proceeding on other proceedings, as well as, persons not parties to the waiver requests'' the Bureau decided to treat the matter as a permit-but-disclose proceeding under the ex parte rules. Subsequently, on April 18, 2000, Pegasus filed a waiver request and application for
• http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Orders/2000/fcc00025.doc http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Orders/2000/fcc00025.pdf http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Orders/2000/fcc00025.txt
  • by the Commission's permit-but-disclose ex parte procedures as set forth in 47 C.F.R. 1.1206(b) and placed in a file associated with the record concerning the captioned applications. Any similar communications received in the future will be treated in the same manner. All persons are reminded, however, that the matter involving the captioned applications remains a restricted proceeding under 47 C.F.R. 1.1208, until such time as the proceeding on the assignment applications is formally terminated and no longer subject to Commission or court review. Thus, any written presentations directly addressing the merits or outcome of those applications must be served on all parties to that proceeding. Similarly, no such oral presentations concerning the applications may be made without advance notice to all
• http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/OGC/Orders/1998/fcc98056.pdf http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/OGC/Orders/1998/fcc98056.wp
  • West Comments at 4; CEMA Comments at 3. 26 12 FCC Rcd at 5150 n.1, 5153-54. 27 See Notice, 12 FCC Rcd 5150 n.2 (explaining that broadcast allotment proceedings are not included in the ECFS at this time because of the large numbers of such proceedings and because the are restricted under the Commission's ex parte rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.1208, which increases the chances that electronic filings might not be properly served on the parties). 28 Bell Atlantic/NYNEX Comments at 1-2 (petitions for rulemaking, NOIs, reconsideration, motions); NTCA Comments at 2 (petitions for rulemaking and NOIs); NAD Comments at 3 (pre-NPRM matters like NOIs); NECA Comments at 6 (petitions for reconsideration); U S West Comments at 2 (preliminary phase pleadings
• http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Public_Notices/2000/da002614.pdf
  • Hayes� compatible modem (56.6 kbps recommended) � Monitor: VGA or above � Mouse or other pointing device � Microsoft� Windows� 95� or 98� 12 47 C.F.R. �1.2109 (d). 13 See Qualcomm Incorporated Petition for Declaratory Ruling Giving Effect to the Mandate of the District of Columbia Circuit Court of Appeals, Order, FCC 00-189 (rel. June 8, 2000). 14 47 C.F.R. �1.1208. 15 See 47 C.F.R. �1.1200(a) note (1); see also "Commission Announces that Mutually Exclusive `Short-Form' Applications (Form 175) to Participate in Competitive Bidding Process (`Auctions') Are Treated as Exempt for Ex Parte Purposes," Public Notice, 9 FCC Rcd 6760 (1994). 6 � We recommend that you use Netscape� Communicator� 4.73. However, you can also use Netscape Communicator 4.5, 4.51, 4.61,
• http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Public_Notices/2001/da012660.html
  • Branch, RIC, (202) 418- 1355. Please note that the Verizon waiver request and NCS statement can be found on the internet at the following URL addresses: Waiver request - [4]http://wireless.fcc.gov/releases/011102-verizon_petition.pdf NCS statement - [5]http://wireless.fcc.gov/releases/011102-ncs_statement.pdf Unless otherwise provided, requests for waiver of the Commission's Rules are subject to treatment by the Commission as restricted proceedings for ex parte purposes under Section 1.1208 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. 1.1208. Therefore, ex parte presentations to or from Commission decision-making personnel are prohibited until this proceeding is no longer subject to administrative reconsideration or review or judicial review. For further information, contact Karen Franklin, Esq. of the Policy and Rules Branch of the Public Safety and Private Wireless Division of the Wireless Telecommunications Bureau
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2001/fcc01285.html http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2001/fcc01285.pdf
  • Sprint to Joint Motion, File Nos. EB-01-MD-001, 002 (filed Aug. 10, 2001) at 2 (noting that ``[a]ll three parties to this proceeding have elected to seek judicial review of the [BTI] Order in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit''). 11 47 C.F.R. 1.1202(a). 12 47 C.F.R. 1.1202(b). 13 47 C.F.R. 1.1202(c), 1.1206. 14 47 C.F.R. 1.1208, 1.1204. 15 47 U.S.C. 208. 16 47 C.F.R. 1.1208, 1.1206, 1.1204. 17 See, e.g., Letter from Alexander P. Starr, Chief, Market Disputes Resolution Division, Enforcement Bureau, to James F. Bendernagel, Counsel for AT&T, Jonathan E. Canis, Counsel for BTI, and Cheryl A. Tritt, Counsel for Sprint, File Nos. EB-01- MD-001, 002 (Jan. 18, 2001). 18 47 C.F.R. 1.1202, 1.1208. See,
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2003/FCC-03-107A1.html
  • the Bureau. Qwest's responses included correspondence dated January 10, 15, and 31, and February 3 and 11, 2003. 14 Qwest provided further information in correspondence dated March 11, 2003 and in response to questions from the staff. 15 Because of the nexus between the formal complaints and the Investigation, the Bureau treated the Investigation as a restricted proceeding under section 1.1208 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 1.1208. As a result, the Bureau included Touch America in correspondence between Qwest and the Commission. Pursuant to section 1.1204(a)(10) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 1.1204(a)(10), the Commission and Qwest conducted bi-lateral settlement discussions. All of the information provided by Qwest during those settlement discussions ``relat[ed] to how a proceeding should or could
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2009/DA-09-719A1.html
  • action against a regional wireless carrier, MetroPCS, for refusing to pay North County Communications for use of its network as the FCC's rules require." Id. at 1 (emphasis added). Id. Formal complaints are made restricted by 47 C.F.R. S:S: 1.1202(d)(2) (stating that parties to a formal complaint are parties to a proceeding for purposes of the ex parte rules) and 1.1208 (stating that proceedings not otherwise designated are restricted). Ex parte presentations to and from Commission decision-makers are prohibited in restricted proceedings. See 47 C.F.R. S: 1.1208. The resolution of this issue was made in consultation with the Commission's Office of General Counsel, in accordance with 47 C.F.R. S: 0.251(g). See Letter from David Senzel, Attorney-Advisor, Office of General Counsel, FCC,
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2011/DA-11-1731A1.html
  • federal court litigation, in light of the All American Order, or Qwest will move the court to dismiss those claims with prejudice." Id. at 2. AT&T Corp. v. Business Telecom, Inc., Order on Reconsideration, 16 FCC Rcd 21750 (2001) ("AT&T v. BTI"). Id., 16 FCC Rcd at 21752-53, P:P: 6-7. Aventure Petition for Reconsideration at 3. See 47 C.F.R. S: 1.1208 (Restricted Proceedings). Qwest Petition to Accept Filing at 1. Id. at 3. Commission rule 1.106(b)(1) addresses petitions for reconsideration filed by persons who are not parties to the proceeding. 47 C.F.R. S: 1.106(b). It does not speak to non-parties' attempts to file oppositions to petitions for reconsideration. 47 C.F.R. S: 1.223(b). See Teleconnect Co. v. The Bell Company of Pennsylvania,
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2011/FCC-11-148A1.html
  • the Commission has held that "to grant non-party requests to reconsider Commission adjudicatory orders based upon the [precedential effect of an adjudicatory order] would open the `floodgates' to non-party participation in adjudicatory proceedings, and thus effectively convert every adjudicatory proceeding into a rulemaking proceeding." Id. at 21753, P: 7 (citations omitted). Aventure Petition at 5. See 47 C.F.R. S:S: 1.1202(b), 1.1208. See http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/mdrd/c208.html. We note that Aventure does not claim that it lacked awareness of this proceeding. Indeed, counsel for Aventure and counsel for Northern Valley are partners on the twelve-person "Telecommunications Team" in the same law firm. See http://www.arentfox.com/practices/telecom/index.cfm?fa=team. (Continued from previous page) (continued...) Federal Communications Commission FCC 11-148 1 4 Federal Communications Commission FCC 11-148 References 1. http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-148A1.pdf 2.
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Public_Notices/DA-04-2034A1.html
  • program.3 A copy of NEC's waiver request, plea agreement, and supplement to the waiver request is attached to this Public Notice. We seek comment on NEC BNS's petition, in light of the novel relief that it requests. Requests for waiver of the Commission's rules are subject to treatment by the Commission as restricted proceedings for ex parte purposes under section 1.1208 of the Commission's rules unless otherwise provided.4 Because this request may implicate broadly applicable policy issues, we believe it would be in the public interest to treat this case as a permit-but-disclose proceeding under the ex parte rules.5 Ex parte presentations that are made with respect to the issues involved in the petition will be allowed but must be disclosed
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Public_Notices/DA-04-402A1.html
  • continue to treat this matter as not subject to the ex parte rules2 until such time as further developments (e.g., any issuance of a notice of apparent liability for forfeiture) would render the proceeding restricted.3 For further information, contact William D. Freedman at (202) 418-1415. Action by Chief, Investigations and Hearings Division, Enforcement Bureau _________________________ 1 See 47 C.F.R. 1.1202(d)(2), 1.1208. 2 See 47 C.F.R. 1.1200(a). 3 See 47 C.F.R. 1.1202(d)(3), 1.1208. References 1. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-402A1.pdf 2. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-402A1.doc
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/05/releases/d96-2156.pdf http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/05/releases/d96-2156.txt http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/05/releases/d96-2156.wp
  • WillowRun alleges that PCS 2000 violated the ex parte rules because the Request for Expedited Action addresses the merits of PCS 2000's application proceedings for C Block PCS licenses, which are the subject of a Petition to Deny filed by WillowRun on July 1, 1996, and WillowRun was not served with the Emergency Request as required by Sections 1.1202 and 1.1208 of the Commission's rules. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.1202, 1.1208. On October 9, 1996, PCS 2000 filed an Opposition to WillowRun's Motion, contending that there had been no ex parte violation and that WillowRun's Opposition to its Emergency Request should be dismissed. On December 11, 1996, the Commission's Office of Managing Director sent a letter to attorneys representing WillowRun and
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/05/releases/da961692.pdf http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/05/releases/da961692.txt http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/05/releases/da961692.wp
  • (June 28, 1996). would be due on July 8, 1996. The party listed below submitted the second half of its down 3 payment late. Paradise Cable, Inc.: waiver filed July 5, 1996. Market won: BTA 408. Pursuant to the Commission's ex parte rules, waiver requests become restricted proceedings upon the filing of formal oppositions. See 47 C.F.R. �� 1.1202(e)(1) and 1.1208(c)(1)(i)(B). Ex parte presentations are prohibited in restricted proceedings until the Commission's final disposition is no longer subject to reconsideration or judicial review. For further information, contact Zenji Nakazawa (C Block) or Michael Hamra (900 MHz SMR) at (202) 418-7240, Commercial Wireless Division, or Sharon Bertelsen (MDS) at (202) 418-7057, Mass Media Bureau. Action by the Chief, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau -
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/05/releases/da971152.pdf http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/05/releases/da971152.txt http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/05/releases/da971152.wp
  • Suite 140, Washington, D.C. 20037, (202) 857-3800. Copies are also available for public inspection during regular business hours in Room 5608, 2025 M Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20554. When requesting copies, please refer to DA 97-1152. Pursuant to the Commission's ex parte rules, waiver requests become restricted proceedings upon the filing of formal oppositions. See 47 C.F.R. �� 1.1202(e)(1) and 1.1208(c)(1)(i)(B). Ex parte presentations are prohibited in restricted proceedings until the Commission's final disposition is no longer subject to reconsideration or judicial review. For further information, contact Sande Taxali or Josh Roland, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau, at (202) 418-0660. Action by the Acting Chief, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/06/releases/d96-1900.pdf http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/06/releases/d96-1900.txt http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/06/releases/d96-1900.wp
  • November 22, 1996, and reply comments by November 27, 1996, with the Secretary, FCC, 1919 M Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20554. A copy should also be sent to Wireless Telecommunications Bureau, Room 7002, FCC, Washington, D.C. 20554. Upon the filing of formal oppositions, waiver requests become restricted proceedings and ex parte presentations are prohibited. See 47 C.F.R. �� 1.1202(e)(1) and 1.1208(c)(1)(i)(B). Copies of the waiver request, comments and replies may be obtained from the Commission's duplicating contractor: International Transcription Service, Inc., 2100 M Street, N.W., Suite 140, Washington, D.C. 20037, (202) 857-3500. Copies are also available for public inspection during regular business hours in Room 207, 2033 M Street, N.W., as well as in Room 5608, 2025 M Street, N.W., Washington,
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/06/releases/da961692.pdf http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/06/releases/da961692.txt http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/06/releases/da961692.wp
  • (June 28, 1996). would be due on July 8, 1996. The party listed below submitted the second half of its down 3 payment late. Paradise Cable, Inc.: waiver filed July 5, 1996. Market won: BTA 408. Pursuant to the Commission's ex parte rules, waiver requests become restricted proceedings upon the filing of formal oppositions. See 47 C.F.R. �� 1.1202(e)(1) and 1.1208(c)(1)(i)(B). Ex parte presentations are prohibited in restricted proceedings until the Commission's final disposition is no longer subject to reconsideration or judicial review. For further information, contact Zenji Nakazawa (C Block) or Michael Hamra (900 MHz SMR) at (202) 418-7240, Commercial Wireless Division, or Sharon Bertelsen (MDS) at (202) 418-7057, Mass Media Bureau. Action by the Chief, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau -
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/07/releases/da961692.pdf http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/07/releases/da961692.txt http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/07/releases/da961692.wp
  • (June 28, 1996). would be due on July 8, 1996. The party listed below submitted the second half of its down 3 payment late. Paradise Cable, Inc.: waiver filed July 5, 1996. Market won: BTA 408. Pursuant to the Commission's ex parte rules, waiver requests become restricted proceedings upon the filing of formal oppositions. See 47 C.F.R. �� 1.1202(e)(1) and 1.1208(c)(1)(i)(B). Ex parte presentations are prohibited in restricted proceedings until the Commission's final disposition is no longer subject to reconsideration or judicial review. For further information, contact Zenji Nakazawa (C Block) or Michael Hamra (900 MHz SMR) at (202) 418-7240, Commercial Wireless Division, or Sharon Bertelsen (MDS) at (202) 418-7057, Mass Media Bureau. Action by the Chief, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau -
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/10/releases/da971152.pdf http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/10/releases/da971152.txt http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/10/releases/da971152.wp
  • Suite 140, Washington, D.C. 20037, (202) 857-3800. Copies are also available for public inspection during regular business hours in Room 5608, 2025 M Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20554. When requesting copies, please refer to DA 97-1152. Pursuant to the Commission's ex parte rules, waiver requests become restricted proceedings upon the filing of formal oppositions. See 47 C.F.R. �� 1.1202(e)(1) and 1.1208(c)(1)(i)(B). Ex parte presentations are prohibited in restricted proceedings until the Commission's final disposition is no longer subject to reconsideration or judicial review. For further information, contact Sande Taxali or Josh Roland, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau, at (202) 418-0660. Action by the Acting Chief, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/11/releases/da961235.pdf http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/11/releases/da961235.txt http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/11/releases/da961235.wp
  • and other arrangements entered into relating to the competitive bidding process. Bidders found to have violated the anti-collusion rule may be subject to sanctions. See 47 C.F.R. �� 1.2105(c), 1.2107(d) and 1.2109(d). Ex parte rule: Applicants should also be aware that the Commission has generally exempted auction proceedings from the strict requirements of the ex parte rule (47 C.F.R. � 1.1208). See "Commission Announces that Mutually Exclusive Short-Form' Applications (Form 175) to Participate in Competitive Bidding Process (Auctions') Are Treated as Exempt for Ex Parte Purposes," Public Notice, 9 FCC Rcd 6760 (1994). Bidder information packages: Applicants who do not yet have the Bidder Information Package for this auction (or need additional copies) should call the FCC Wireless Consumer Assistance Branch
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/12/releases/da962162.pdf http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/12/releases/da962162.txt http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/12/releases/da962162.wp
  • competitive bidding process. Bidders found to have violated the anti-collusion rule may be subject to sanctions. Any potential antitrust violations will also be enforced. See 47 C.F.R. �� 1.2105(c), 1.2107(d) and 1.2109(d). Ex parte rule: Applicants should also be aware that the Commission has generally exempted auction proceedings from the strict requirements of the ex parte rule (47 C.F.R. � 1.1208).2 Mock auction: Likewise, all applicants whose short-form applications have been accepted for filing are eligible to participate in a mock electronic auction beginning on Thursday, January 9, 1997. When software for the mock auction is posted for downloading, its availability will be announced by public notice available on-line. Remote bidding software: Applicants are reminded that qualified bidders who filed (or
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/14/releases/da970636.pdf http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/14/releases/da970636.txt http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/14/releases/da970636.wp
  • bidding process. Bidders found to have violated the anti-collusion rule may be subject to sanctions. Any potential antitrust violations will also be enforced. See 47 C.F.R. �� 1.2105(c), 1.2107(d), 1.2109(d) and �27.204(c). Ex parte rule: Applicants should also be aware that the Commission has generally exempted auction proceedings from the strict requirements of the ex parte rule (47 C.F.R. � 1.1208).1 Bidder information packages: Applicants who do not yet have the Bidder Information Package for this auction (or need additional copies) can order it by calling the FCC National Call Center at 888-CALL-FCC (225-5322), or download it from the Commission's world wide web internet page at http://www.fcc.gov/auctions.html. Remote bidding software: Applicants are reminded that bidding for this auction is by electronic
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/15/releases/da970594.pdf http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/15/releases/da970594.txt http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/15/releases/da970594.wp
  • to prevent anti-competitive behavior in the marketplace such as bid rigging, price fixing and splitting markets. Any potential antitrust violations will also be enforced. See 47 C.F.R. �� 25.404, 25.405 and 1.2109(d). Ex parte rule: Applicants should also be aware that the Commission has generally exempted auction proceedings from the strict requirements of the ex parte rule (47 C.F.R. � 1.1208).1 Mock auction: Likewise, all qualified bidders are eligible and encouraged to participate in a mock electronic auction on Monday, March 31, 1997 at 3:00 p.m. ET. Specific instructions for the mock auction will be provided at registration. Both registration and the mock auction will occur at the FCC auction site located at 2 Massachusetts Avenue, NE, Washington, D.C. 20002. Availability
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/16/releases/da972153.pdf http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/16/releases/da972153.txt http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/16/releases/da972153.wp
  • other arrangements entered into relating to the competitive bidding process. Bidders found to have violated the anti- collusion rule may be subject to sanctions. See 47 C.F.R. �� 1.2105(c), 1.2107(d), and 1.209(d). Ex parte rule: Applicants should also be aware that the Commission has generally exempted auction proceedings from the strict requirements of the ex parte rule (47 C.F.R. � 1.1208). See "Commission Announces that Mutually Exclusive `Short-Form' Applications (Form 175) to Participate in Competitive Bidding Process (`Auctions') Are Treated as Exempt for Ex Parte Purposes," Public Notice, 9 FCC Rcd 6760 (1994). Mock auction: Likewise, all applicants whose FCC Form 175 applications have been accepted for filing are eligible to participate in a mock electronic auction on Thursday, October 23,
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/17/releases/d980141.pdf
  • and other arrangements entered into relating to the competitive bidding process. Bidders found to have violated the anti-collusion rule may be subject to sanctions. See 47 C.F.R. �� 1.2105(c), 1.2107(d), and 1.209(d). Ex Parte Rule: Applicants should also be aware that the Commission has generally exempted auction proceedings from the strict requirements of the ex parte rule (47 C.F.R. � 1.1208). See "Commission Announces that Mutually Exclusive `Short-Form' Applications (Form 175) to Participate in Competitive Bidding Process (`Auctions') Are Treated as Exempt for Ex Parte Purposes," Public Notice, 9 FCC Rcd 6760 (1994). Mock Auction: Likewise, all applicants found to be qualified bidders are eligible to participate in a mock electronic auction on February 13, 1998. When software for the mock
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/18/releases/da981689.pdf http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/18/releases/da981689.txt http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/18/releases/da981689.wp
  • and other arrangements entered into relating to the competitive bidding process. Bidders found to have violated the anti-collusion rule may be subject to sanctions. See 47 C.F.R. �� 1.2105(c), 1.2107(d), and 1.2109(d). Ex Parte Rule: Applicants should also be aware that the Commission has generally exempted auction proceedings from the strict requirements of the ex parte rule (47 C.F.R. � 1.1208). See "Commission Announces that Mutually Exclusive `Short-Form' Applications (Form 175) to Participate in Competitive Bidding Process (`Auctions') Are Treated as Exempt for Ex Parte Purposes," Public Notice, 9 FCC Rcd 6760 (1994). Mock Auction: All applicants found to be qualified bidders are eligible to participate in a mock electronic auction on Friday, September 11, 1998. When software for the mock
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/20/releases/da982248.pdf http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/20/releases/da982248.txt http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/20/releases/da982248.wp
  • in all bidding consortia, joint ventures, partnerships, and other arrangements entered into relating to the competitive bidding process. Bidders found to have violated the anti-collusion rule may be subject to sanctions. 10 Ex Parte Rule: Applicants should also be aware that the Commission has generally exempted auction proceedings from the strict requirements of the ex parte rule (47 C.F.R. � 1.1208). 11 Mock Auction: All applicants found to be qualified bidders are eligible to participate in a mock electronic auction on Tuesday, December 1, 1998. The Bureau will issue a Public Notice announcing when software for the mock auction is posted on the World Wide Web and BBS. Remote Bidding Software: Applicants are reminded that qualified bidders that filed (or amended)
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/21/releases/da990249.pdf http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/21/releases/da990249.txt http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/21/releases/da990249.wp
  • all bidding consortia, joint ventures, partnerships, and other arrangements entered into relating to the competitive bidding process. Bidders found to have violated the anti- collusion rule may be subject to sanctions. 9 Ex Parte Rule: Applicants should also be aware that the Commission has generally exempted auction proceedings from the strict requirements of the ex parte rule (47 C.F.R. � 1.1208). 10 Mock Auction: All applicants found to be qualified bidders are eligible to participate in a mock electronic auction on Friday, February 19, 1999. The Bureau will issue a Public Notice announcing when software for the mock auction is posted on the World Wide Web and BBS. Remote Bidding Software: Applicants are reminded that qualified bidders that filed (or amended)
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/22/releases/da990375.pdf http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/22/releases/da990375.txt http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/22/releases/da990375.wp
  • in all bidding consortia, joint ventures, partnerships, and other arrangements entered into relating to the competitive bidding process. Bidders found to have violated the anti-collusion rule may be subject to sanctions. 17 Ex Parte Rule: Applicants should also be aware that the Commission has generally exempted auction proceedings from the strict requirements of the ex parte rule (47 C.F.R. � 1.1208). 18 Because the short-form application (FCC Form 175) for Auction No. 22 of Leap raises issues that are also raised in an assignment application pending before the Bureau, which is a restricted proceeding under the ex parte rule, the Commission will treat Leap's short-form application as a restricted proceeding for purposes of ex parte communications.19 Mock Auction: All applicants found
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/23/releases/da990639.doc http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/23/releases/da990639.pdf http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/23/releases/da990639.txt
  • involved in all bidding consortia, joint ventures, partnerships, and other arrangements entered into relating to the competitive bidding process. Bidders found to have violated the anti-collusion rule may be subject to sanctions. Ex Parte Rule: Applicants should also be aware that the Commission has generally exempted auction proceedings from the strict requirements of the ex parte rule (47 C.F.R. � 1.1208). Mock Auction: All applicants found to be qualified bidders are eligible to participate in a mock electronic auction on Thursday, April 22, 1999. The Bureau will issue a Public Notice announcing when software for the mock auction is posted on the World Wide Web and BBS. Remote Bidding Software: Applicants are reminded that qualified bidders are eligible to bid either
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/24/releases/da990904.doc http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/24/releases/da990904.pdf http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/24/releases/da990904.txt
  • involved in all bidding consortia, joint ventures, partnerships, and other arrangements entered into relating to the competitive bidding process. Bidders found to have violated the anti-collusion rule may be subject to sanctions. Ex Parte Rule: Applicants should also be aware that the Commission has generally exempted auction proceedings from the strict requirements of the ex parte rule (47 C.F.R. � 1.1208). Mock Auction: All applicants found to be qualified bidders are eligible to participate in a mock electronic auction on Friday, June 4, 1999. The Bureau will issue a Public Notice announcing when software for the mock auction is posted on the World Wide Web and BBS. Remote Bidding Software: Applicants are reminded that qualified bidders are eligible to bid either
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/25/releases/da991009.pdf http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/25/releases/da991009.txt http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/25/releases/da991009.wp
  • to each others' applications merely because their applications are mutually exclusive. Note 1 further explains that, where someone has become a party with respect to such an application by other means, e.g., by filing a petition or other objection against the applicant that has been served on the applicant, both the applicant and the objector are deemed parties under Section 1.1208 of the rules. Consequently, any presentation by either the applicant or the objector which, if written, is not served on all parties or, if oral, is made without advance notice to all parties and without opportunity for them to be present is an impermissible ex parte presentation under Section 1.1202(b) of the rules. Similarly, once the applications have been designated
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/25/releases/da991800.pdf
  • involved in all bidding consortia, joint ventures, partnerships, and other arrangements entered into relating to the competitive bidding process.8 Bidders found to have violated the anti-collusion rule may be subject to sanctions.9 Ex Parte Rule: Applicants should also be aware that the Commission has generally exempted auction proceedings from the strict requirements of the ex parte rule (47 C.F.R. � 1.1208).10 Mock Auction: All applicants found to be qualified bidders are eligible to participate in a mock electronic auction on Friday, September 24, 1999. The Bureau will issue a Public Notice announcing when software for the mock auction will be posted on the World Wide Web and BBS. Bidder Alerts: All applicants must certify on their FCC Form 175 applications under
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/28/releases/da000405.doc http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/28/releases/da000405.pdf http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/28/releases/da000405.txt
  • involved in all bidding consortia, joint ventures, partnerships, and other arrangements entered into relating to the competitive bidding process. Bidders found to have violated the anti-collusion rule may be subject to sanctions. Ex Parte Rule: Applicants should also be aware that the Commission has generally exempted auction proceedings from the strict requirements of the ex parte rule (47 C.F.R. � 1.1208). Mock Auction: All applicants found to be qualified bidders are eligible to participate in a mock electronic auction on Friday, March 17, 2000. The Bureau will issue a public notice announcing when software for the mock auction will be posted on the World Wide Web. Remote Bidding Software: Applicants are reminded that qualified bidders are eligible to bid either electronically
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/34/releases/da001913.doc http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/34/releases/da001913.pdf http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/34/releases/da001913.txt
  • 12th Street, S.W., CY-A257, Washington, D.C. 20554. Copies may also be obtained from ITS. For further information regarding the public reference file for this Request, contact Maria Ringold, Chief, Wireless Branch, RIC, (202) 418-1350. Unless otherwise provided, requests for waiver of the Commission's Rules are subject to treatment by the Commission as restricted proceedings for ex parte purposes under Section 1.1208 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.1208. Because of the policy implications and poltential impact of this proceeding on persons not parties to the waiver request, we believe it would be in the public interest to treat this case as a permit-but-disclose proceeding under the ex parte rules. See 47 C.F.R. �� 1.1200(a), 1.1206. Therefore, subsequent to the release
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/35/releases/da002614.doc http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/35/releases/da002614.pdf http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/35/releases/da002614.txt
  • its transferee, in whole or in part, to adjust a winning bid in any spectrum auction prior to June 8, 2003, subject to terms and conditions set forth in the Commission's Order. Ex Parte Rule: Applicants should also be aware that the Commission has generally exempted auction proceedings from the strict requirements of the ex parte rule found in Section 1.1208 of the Commission's rules. Mock Auction: All applicants found to be qualified bidders are eligible to participate in a mock electronic auction on Friday, December 8, 2000. In the Qualified Bidders Public Notice, the Bureau will announce when software for the mock auction will be posted on the World Wide Web. Remote Bidding Software: Applicants are reminded that qualified bidders
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/35/releases/da012388.pdf http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/35/releases/da012388.txt
  • Vincent D. McBride and Scott D. Reiter to Michael K. Powell, Chairman, Federal Communications Commission ("FCC") (Aug. 25, 2001); letter from Scott D. Reiter and Vincent D. McBride to Michael K. Powell, Chairman, FCC (July 16, 2001); letter from Vincent D. McBride and Scott D. Reiter to Michael K. Powell, Chairman, FCC (July 9, 2001). 2 See 47 C.F.R. � 1.1208 Note 1 and Example.
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/38/releases/da010138.doc http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/38/releases/da010138.pdf http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/38/releases/da010138.txt
  • its transferee, in whole or in part, to adjust a winning bid in any spectrum auction prior to June 8, 2003, subject to terms and conditions set forth in the Commission's Order. Ex Parte Rule: Applicants should also be aware that the Commission has generally exempted auction proceedings from the strict requirements of the ex parte rule found in Section 1.1208 of the Commission's rules. Mock Auction: All applicants found to be qualified bidders are eligible to participate in a mock auction on Friday, February 9, 2001. In the Qualified Bidders Public Notice, the Bureau will announce when software for the mock auction will be posted on the World Wide Web. Telephonic bidding will also be available during the mock auction.
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/39/releases/da011177.doc http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/39/releases/da011177.pdf http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/39/releases/da011177.txt
  • Auction Discount Voucher to adjust the transferee's winning bids in Auction No. 35, the Auction Discount Voucher could be used to adjust winning bids in another FCC auction, including Auction No. 39. Ex Parte Rule: Applicants should also be aware that the Commission has generally exempted auction proceedings from the strict requirements of the ex parte rule found in Section 1.1208 of the Commission's rules. Mock Auction: All applicants found to be qualified bidders are eligible to participate in a mock electronic auction on Monday, June 4, 2001. In the Qualified Bidders Public Notice, the Bureau will announce when software for the mock auction will be posted on the World Wide Web. Remote Bidding Software: Applicants are reminded that qualified bidders
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/40/releases/da012262.pdf http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/40/releases/da012262.txt
  • a transferee, except that a transferee may not transfer the ADV to an entity other than back to Qualcomm. See In the Matter of Qualcomm Incorporated, Order, 16 FCC Rcd 4042 (2000); see also Letter from Thomas J. Sugrue, Chief, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau, Federal Communications Commission, to Veronica M. Ahern, Attorney for Qualcomm Incorporated (December 22, 2000). 15 47 C.F.R. �1.1208. 16 See "Commission Announces that Mutually Exclusive `Short-Form' Applications (Form 175) to Participate in Competitive Bidding Process (`Auctions') Are Treated as Exempt for Ex Parte Purposes," Public Notice, 9 FCC Rcd 6760 (1994). 6 Qualified Bidders Public Notice, the Bureau will announce the bidding schedule for the mock auction and give details about participation. The mock auction will be conducted
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/41/releases/da012052.doc http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/41/releases/da012052.pdf http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/41/releases/da012052.txt
  • to adjust one of its winning bids in Auction No. 35. The remaining portion of Qualcomm's ADV could be used to adjust winning bids in another FCC auction, including Auction No. 41. Ex Parte Rule: Applicants should also be aware that the Commission has generally exempted auction proceedings from the strict requirements of the ex parte rule found in Section 1.1208 of the Commission's rules. Mock Auction: All applicants found to be qualified bidders are eligible to participate in a mock auction on Friday, September 28, 2001. Internet bidding is a new concept in our auctions program, and we encourage all qualified bidders to take advantage of this mock auction. In the Qualified Bidders Public Notice, the Bureau will announce the
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/42/releases/da012349.pdf http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/42/releases/da012349.txt
  • a transferee, except that a transferee may not transfer the ADV to an entity other than back to Qualcomm. See In the Matter of Qualcomm Incorporated, Order, 16 FCC Rcd 4042 (2000); see also Letter from Thomas J. Sugrue, Chief, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau, Federal Communications Commission, to Veronica M. Ahern, Attorney for Qualcomm Incorporated (December 22, 2000). 19 47 C.F.R. �1.1208. 20 See "Commission Announces that Mutually Exclusive `Short-Form' Applications (Form 175) to Participate in Competitive Bidding Process (`Auctions') Are Treated as Exempt for Ex Parte Purposes," Public Notice, 9 FCC Rcd 6760 (1994). 6 � Web Browser, either of the following: � Microsoft Internet Explorer 4.0 or higher (recommended) � Netscape� Communicator� 4.0 or higher, with Java Plug-In Version 1.3.1
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/45/releases/da020965.pdf http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/45/releases/da020965.txt
  • to its use by a transferee, except that a transferee may not transfer the ADV to an entity other than back to Qualcomm. See Qualcomm Order, 16 FCC Rcd 4042 (2000); see also Letter from Thomas J. Sugrue, Chief, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau, Federal Communications Commission, to Veronica M. Ahern, Attorney for Qualcomm Incorporated (December 22, 2000). 16 47 C.F.R. � 1.1208. 17 See "Commission Announces that Mutually Exclusive `Short-Form' Applications (Form 175) to Participate in Competitive Bidding Process (`Auctions') Are Treated as Exempt for Ex Parte Purposes," Public Notice, 9 FCC Rcd 6760 (1994). 6 � Monitor: VGA or above � Mouse or other pointing device � Operating System: Microsoft� Windows� 95�, 98�, 2000�, ME�, NT� � Web Browser, either of
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/53/releases/fc000418.pdf http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/53/releases/fc000418.txt
  • proceeding is restricted as between Pegasus and Northpoint and as such, Northpoint's ex parte presentations violated the Commission's ex parte rules. Thus, according to Pegasus, the severity of the ex parte violations warrants dismissal of the Northpoint applications. See Pegasus Petition to Dismiss or Deny (filed Aug. 21, 2000) at 5-11 (Pegasus Petition). See also 47 C.F.R. �� 1.1202(b), (d); 1.1208(c)(1)(i)(C). 642 Id. Federal Communications Commission FCC 00-418 121 service will be on a secondary, non-interfering basis to DBS services and on a co-primary basis with any new FSS entering the subject frequency band.643 On March 11, 1999, the Bureau sought comment on Northpoint's request for waiver.644 Requests for waiver of the Commission's Rules are subject, unless otherwise provided, to treatment
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/80/releases/da000594.doc http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/80/releases/da000594.pdf http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/80/releases/da000594.txt
  • involved in all bidding consortia, joint ventures, partnerships, and other arrangements entered into relating to the competitive bidding process. Bidders found to have violated the anti-collusion rule may be subject to sanctions. Ex Parte Rule: Applicants should also be aware that the Commission has generally exempted auction proceedings from the strict requirements of the ex parte rule (47 C.F.R. � 1.1208). Bidder Alert: All applicants certified on their FCC short-form (Form 175) applications under penalty of perjury that they were legally, technically, financially and otherwise qualified to hold a license, and not in default on any payment for Commission licenses (including down payments) or delinquent on any non-tax debt owed to any Federal agency. Prospective bidders are reminded that submission of
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/80/releases/da000863.doc http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/80/releases/da000863.pdf http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/80/releases/da000863.txt
  • involved in all bidding consortia, joint ventures, partnerships, and other arrangements entered into relating to the competitive bidding process. Bidders found to have violated the anti-collusion rule may be subject to sanctions. Ex Parte Rule: Applicants should also be aware that the Commission has generally exempted auction proceedings from the strict requirements of the ex parte rule (47 C.F.R. � 1.1208). Bidder Alert: All applicants certified on their FCC short-form (Form 175) applications under penalty of perjury that they were legally, technically, financially and otherwise qualified to hold a license, and not in default on any payment for Commission licenses (including down payments) or delinquent on any non-tax debt owed to any Federal agency. Prospective bidders are reminded that submission of
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/anticollusion/releases/ocg00-1292.pdf
  • we reject summarily the appellant's other arguments; aimed only at showing the agency was wrong, they have not the power to persuade that the agency was unreasonable. C. The Ex Parte Rules With certain exceptions clearly not applicable here, the Commission prohibits "ex parte presentations" during the pendency of an administrative adjudication and any subsequent judicial review. 47 C.F.R. � 1.1208. The regulations define a "presentation" as a "communication directed to the merits or outcome of a proceeding." Id. at � 1.1202(a). A written presentation is "ex parte" if it is "not served on the parties to the proceeding." Id. at � 1.1202(b). Thus, a written presentation comes within the prohibition of the rules only if it is both "directed to
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/releases/da012883.pdf http://wireless.fcc.gov/releases/da012883.txt
  • Chief, Wireless Branch, RIC, (202) 418- 1355. Please note that the VoiceStream waiver request and NCS statement can be found on the internet at the following URL addresses: Waiver request: http://gullfoss2.fcc.gov/prod/ecfs/retrieve.cgi?native_or_pdf=pdf&id_document=6512974955 NCS Statement: http://gullfoss2.fcc.gov/prod/ecfs/retrieve.cgi?native_or_pdf=pdf&id_document=6512974956 Unless otherwise provided, requests for waiver of the Commission's Rules are subject to treatment by the Commission as restricted proceedings for ex parte purposes under Section 1.1208 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.1208. Therefore, ex parte presentations to or from Commission decision-making personnel are prohibited until this proceeding is no longer subject to administrative reconsideration or review or judicial review. For further information, contact Karen Franklin, Esq. of the Policy and Rules Branch of the Public Safety and Private Wireless Division of the Wireless Telecommunications
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Cable/Orders/2000/da000937.doc
  • IT IS ORDERED that the Emergency Petition for Declaratory Ruling and Enforcement Order, or, in the alternative, for Immediate Injunctive Relief filed by ABC, Inc. IS GRANTED to the extent indicated herein. This action is taken pursuant to delegated authority under Section 0.321 of the Commission's rules. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Deborah A. Lathen Chief, Cable Services Bureau Pursuant to Section 1.1208 of the Commission's rules, this proceeding is classified as restricted for ex parte purposes. 47 C.F.R. � 1.1208. Communications Act � 614(b)(9), 47 U.S.C. � 534(b)(9). In pertinent part, Section 76.58 provides: Note: No deletion or repositioning of a local commercial television station shall occur during a period in which major television rating services measure the size of audiences of
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Cable/Public_Notices/2000/da000994.doc
  • PROVIDE POINT OF DEPLOYMENT MODULES CSR 5545-Z Pursuant to Section 76.7 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 76.7, Charter Communications, Inc. (``Charter'') filed a petition for special relief requesting a waiver of 47 C.F.R. � 76.1204. Charter seeks a waiver from the requirement to offer point of deployment modules (``PODs'') for some of its cable systems. Pursuant to Section 1.1208, of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.1208, this proceeding is designated as restricted for purposes of the Commission's ex parte rules. Comments and oppositions to Charter's petition must be filed within 15 days of the release of this public notice. Replies are due 5 days thereafter. All filings should reference the case identifier assigned to this proceeding, CSR 5545-Z.
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Cable/Public_Notices/2000/da001056.doc
  • PROVIDE POINT OF DEPLOYMENT MODULES CSR 5548-Z Pursuant to Section 76.7 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 76.7, AT&T Broadband, L.L.C. (``AT&T) filed a petition for special relief requesting a waiver of 47 C.F.R. � 76.1204. AT&T seeks a waiver from the requirement to offer point of deployment modules (``PODs'') for some of its cable systems. Pursuant to Section 1.1208, of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.1208, this proceeding is designated as restricted for purposes of the Commission's ex parte rules. Comments and oppositions to AT&T's petition must be filed by May 22, 2000. Replies are due May 30, 2000. All filings should reference the case identifier assigned to this proceeding, CSR 5548-Z. The petition is available for public
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Cable/Public_Notices/2000/da001333.doc
  • POINT OF DEPLOYMENT MODULES CSR 5558-Z Pursuant to Section 76.7 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 76.7, Insight Communications Company, L.P. (``Insight'') filed a petition for special relief requesting a waiver of 47 C.F.R. � 76.1204. Insight seeks a waiver from the requirement to offer point of deployment modules (``PODs'') for some of its cable systems. Pursuant to Section 1.1208, of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.1208, this proceeding is designated as restricted for purposes of the Commission's ex parte rules. Comments and oppositions to Insight's petition must be filed by July 6, 2000. Replies are due July 17, 2000. All filings should reference the case identifier assigned to this proceeding, CSR 5558-Z. The petition is available for public
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Cable/Public_Notices/2000/da001541.doc
  • PROVIDE POINT OF DEPLOYMENT MODULES CSR 5569-Z Pursuant to Section 76.7 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 76.7, Mediacom Communications Corporation (``Mediacom'') filed a petition for special relief requesting a waiver of 47 C.F.R. � 76.1204. Mediacom seeks a waiver from the requirement to offer point of deployment modules (``PODs'') for some of its cable systems. Pursuant to Section 1.1208, of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.1208, this proceeding is designated as restricted for purposes of the Commission's ex parte rules. Comments and oppositions to Mediacom's petition must be filed by July 20, 2000. Replies are due July 31, 2000. All filings should reference the case identifier assigned to this proceeding, CSR 5569-Z. The petition is available for public
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Cable/Public_Notices/2000/da001542.doc
  • OF DEPLOYMENT MODULES CSR 5572-Z Pursuant to Section 76.7 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 76.7, Time Warner Cable (``Time Warner'') filed a petition for special relief requesting a waiver of 47 C.F.R. � 76.1204. Time Warner seeks a waiver from the requirement to offer point of deployment modules (``PODs'') for some of its cable systems. Pursuant to Section 1.1208, of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.1208, this proceeding is designated as restricted for purposes of the Commission's ex parte rules. Comments and oppositions to Time Warner's petition must be filed by July 20, 2000. Replies are due July 31, 2000. All filings should reference the case identifier assigned to this proceeding, CSR 5572-Z. The petition is available for
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Cable/Public_Notices/2000/da001543.doc
  • TO PROVIDE POINT OF DEPLOYMENT MODULES CSR 5570-Z Pursuant to Section 76.7 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 76.7, CableAmerica Corporation (``CableAmerica'') filed a petition for special relief requesting a waiver of 47 C.F.R. � 76.1204. CableAmerica seeks a waiver from the requirement to offer point of deployment modules (``PODs'') for some of its cable systems. Pursuant to Section 1.1208, of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.1208, this proceeding is designated as restricted for purposes of the Commission's ex parte rules. Comments and oppositions to CableAmerica's petition must be filed by July 20, 2000. Replies are due July 31, 2000. All filings should reference the case identifier assigned to this proceeding, CSR 5570-Z. The petition is available for public
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1997/fcc97387.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1997/fcc97387.wp
  • to the SMS; and (v) that the BOCs did not have proper authorization from the Commission before constructing the SMS in violation of Section 214(a) of the Act. Id. at 10563. See Notice of Formal Complaint, File No. E-94-57 (Com. Car. Bur. Enf. Div., Apr. 21, 1994); 47 15 C.F.R. � 1.735(d). Notice of Formal Complaint, supra; 47 C.F.R. � 1.1208. 16 Letter from Russell D. Lukas to William F. Caton, Acting Secretary, FCC, dated May 2, 1994, File 17 No. E-94-57 ("Lukas Letter"). The docket indicates that this letter was served on the Commission by mail, and was received on May 6, 1994. This letter also indicates that it was served by mail on the parties to the tariff investigation
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/fcc99181.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/fcc99181.txt http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/fcc99181.wp
  • the public interest. For example, the staff could designate an informal complaint as either "restricted" (which would mean that ex parte munications would be strictly prohibited) or non-restricted (ex parte communications are permitted but must be fully disclosed to the Commission other parties to the proceeding) if deemed in the public interest. See 47 C.F.R. 1.1200-1.1208. 336 See 47 U.S.C. 1.1208. 337 Id. As we noted above, our ex parte rules specifically authorize the Commission or its staff to apply different ex parte procedures in particular s if deemed in the public interest. Federal Communications Commission FCC 99-181 71 to the Commission's attention, the staff will be poised to pursue the matter on its own motion and, when warranted, take or
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/2001/da011414.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/2001/da011414.txt
  • International Transcription service, Inc., 1231 20th Street, NW, Washington, D.C. 20037. We will treat this proceeding as a permit-but-disclose proceeding for purposes of the Commission's ex parte rules. See generally, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.1200-1.1206. However, if this waiver petition is opposed, it will be treated as a restricted proceeding under the Commission's ex parte rules. See generally, 47 C.F.R. � 1.1208. For further information contact Antoinette Stevens at (202) 418-7400, TTY (202) 418-0484. PUBLIC NOTICE DA 01-1414 Federal Communications Commission 445 12th St.., S.W. Washington, D.C. 20554 News Media Information 202 / 418-0500 Fax-On-Demand 202 / 418-2830 TTY 202 / 418-2555 ftp.fcc.gov � � (c) <� (c) �� ����PNG RR�~R�n� |�o� |�o� X*�N�*K � ~j0tm@"Iu�� �2~��y=��b��"���05 X� ?''z[�'';: ''@�/'", �Z!� g$!���H
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Orders/2000/fcc00418.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Orders/2000/fcc00418.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Orders/2000/fcc00418.txt
  • a secondary, non-interfering basis to DBS services and on a co-primary basis with any new FSS entering the subject frequency band. On March 11, 1999, the Bureau sought comment on Northpoint's request for waiver. Requests for waiver of the Commission's Rules are subject, unless otherwise provided, to treatment by the Commission as restricted proceedings for ex parte purposes under Section 1.1208 of our Rules. In this case, ``because of the policy implications and the potential impact of this proceeding on other proceedings, as well as, persons not parties to the waiver requests'' the Bureau decided to treat the matter as a permit-but-disclose proceeding under the ex parte rules. Subsequently, on April 18, 2000, Pegasus filed a waiver request and application for
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/International/Orders/2000/fcc00109.doc
  • denying Global Link's Request to Permit Ex Parte Presentations in this proceeding. Philippine Long Distance Tel. Co. v. USA Global Link, Inc., 12 FCC Rcd 22039 (Com. Car. Bur. 1997). We note that a section 208 complaint proceeding is treated as a restricted proceeding from the day on which the matter is filed with the Commission. See 47 C.F.R. �� 1.1208. The Bureau hardly exceeded its discretion in complying with the rule. Furthermore, our decision denying Global Link's Application for Review effectively renders moot Global Link's Ex Parte Application for Review. See Global Link Order, 12 FCC Rcd at 12011. Although several configurations of call-back are currently in use, "uncompleted call signalling" is the only configuration that was at issue in
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/International/Public_Notices/1998/da980833.html http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/International/Public_Notices/1998/da980833.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/International/Public_Notices/1998/da980833.txt http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/International/Public_Notices/1998/da980833.wp
  • a Petition for Rulemaking ("Petition") to permit such NGSO FSS operations. See RM-9147. The Commission released the Skybridge application and Petition for public comment, and oppositions were filed regarding both by various parties. In as much as the Skybridge application is an adjudicative licensing proceeding, it is generally restricted under the Commission's ex parte rules. See 47 C.F.R. 1.1202(d) and 1.1208. The Petition, however, is a exempt proceeding under the ex parte rules. 47 C.F.R. 1.1204. The Skybridge application raises complex technical, legal and policy issues, making it essential that the Commission obtain the most current information available, subject to appropriate procedural safeguards. In order to assist the Commission in developing a complete record on which a well-reasoned decision can be
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/International/Public_Notices/1999/pnin9052.pdf
  • 11 Comments or petitions regarding these applications may be filed on or before APRIL 30, 1999. Replies and oppositions may be filed on or before MAY 17, 1999. Responses may be filed on or before MAY 27, 1999. Ex Parte Status of this Proceeding. The applications listed above are restricted under the Commission's ex parte rules. See �� 1.1200(d) and 1.1208. In order to assist the Commission in developing a complete record on which a well-reasoned decision can be made, we hereby redesignate the application proceeding as "permit but disclose." We conclude that such treatment would best serve the public interest, in light of the intricate legal and technical issues raised by the Applications and the interrelated technical sharing issues the
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/International/Public_Notices/1999/pnin9060.pdf
  • Comments or petitions regarding these applications may be filed on or before JUNE 9, 1999. Replies and oppositions may be filed on or before JUNE 30, 1999. Responses may be filed on or before JULY 16, 1999. Ex Parte Status of this Proceeding. The above applications are restricted under the Commission's ex parte rules. See �� 47 C.F.R. 1.1202(d) and 1.1208. These filings raise complex technical, legal and policy issues, making it essential that the Commission obtain the most current information available, subject to the appropriate procedural safeguards. In order to assist the Commission in developing a complete record on which a well-reasoned decision can be made, the ex parte procedures for these filings are modified. Further, many of the technical
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/International/Public_Notices/2000/da000192.pdf
  • D.C., 20554, (202) 418-0270 and from ITS Duplicating Services, 1231 20th St., N.W., Washington D.C. 20036, (202) 857-3800. For further information, contact Kathleen Campbell at (202) 418-0753 or Michael McCoin at (202) 418-0774. Ex Parte Status of Proceeding. The proceeding captioned above is an adjudicative proceeding and is generally restricted under Commission ex parte rules. [47 C.F.R. �� 1.1202(d) and 1.1208.] INTELSAT L.L.C. requests that the proceeding be declared "non-restrictive" "permit-but-disclose" for purposes of our ex parte rules. [INTELSAT L.L.C. Application at Vol. 1, 69-71. See also, generally, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.1200 et seq.] INTELSAT L.L.C. states that declaring this proceeding permit-but-disclose would "best ensure that the public interest is served." INTELSAT L.L.C. asserts that this is because of the "unusual
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/International/Public_Notices/2000/da002249.doc
  • IN THE MATTER OF MARITIME TELECOMMUNICATIONS NETWORK, INC., APPLICATION FOR SPECIAL TEMPORARY AUTHORITY, REQUEST FOR SPECIAL TEMPORARY AUTHORITY TO OPERATE EARTH STATIONS COMMUNICATING WITH SATELLITES OF NEW SKIES SATELLITE, N.V., APPLICATIONS FOR FIXED EARTH STATION LICENSES The proceeding captioned above is an adjudicative proceeding and is generally restricted under the Commission's ex parte rules. See 47 C.F.R. �� 1.1202(d) and 1.1208. Maritime Telecommunications Network, Inc. (MTN) seeks modification of the ex parte procedures in this proceeding to discuss issues that could be raised by its contemplated petition to stay the International Bureau's Order of September 29, 2000. See Maritime Telecommunications Network, Inc., Order, DA 00-1300 (released Sept. 29, 2000) (Order). The Order addressed several complex legal and jurisdictional issues. In addition,
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Orders/2000/fcc00025.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Orders/2000/fcc00025.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Orders/2000/fcc00025.txt
  • by the Commission's permit-but-disclose ex parte procedures as set forth in 47 C.F.R. 1.1206(b) and placed in a file associated with the record concerning the captioned applications. Any similar communications received in the future will be treated in the same manner. All persons are reminded, however, that the matter involving the captioned applications remains a restricted proceeding under 47 C.F.R. 1.1208, until such time as the proceeding on the assignment applications is formally terminated and no longer subject to Commission or court review. Thus, any written presentations directly addressing the merits or outcome of those applications must be served on all parties to that proceeding. Similarly, no such oral presentations concerning the applications may be made without advance notice to all
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Public_Notices/da002246.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Public_Notices/da002246.txt
  • No. 24828) announcing that the applications had been accepted for filing and establishing a pleading cycle to permit interested parties an opportunity to comment on the proposed transaction. Applications for consent to the transfer of control of broadcast licenses and authorizations are subject, unless otherwise provided, to treatment by the Commission as restricted proceedings for ex parte purposes under Section 1.1208 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �1.1208. However, in order to permit a full exchange on the multiple issues under consideration by the Commission, we have concluded that the public interest would be served by classifying this proceeding as permit-but-disclose under the ex parte rules. Accordingly, by this Public Notice, and pursuant to Section 1.1200(a) of the Commission's rules, 47
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Public_Notices/da992724.doc
  • No. 24624) announcing that the applications had been accepted for filing and establishing a pleading cycle to permit interested parties an opportunity to comment on the proposed transaction. Applications for consent to the transfer of control of broadcast licenses and authorizations are subject, unless otherwise provided, to treatment by the Commission as restricted proceedings for ex parte purposes under section 1.1208 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.1208. However, in order to permit a full exchange on the multiple issues under consideration by the Commission, we have concluded that the public interest would be served by classifying this proceeding as permit-but-disclose under the ex parte rules. Accordingly, by this Public Notice, and pursuant to section 1.1200(a) of the Commission's rules,
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Public_Notices/da992741.doc
  • No. 24628) announcing that the applications had been accepted for filing and establishing a pleading cycle to permit interested parties an opportunity to comment on the proposed transaction. Applications for consent to the transfer of control of broadcast licenses and authorizations are subject, unless otherwise provided, to treatment by the Commission as restricted proceedings for ex parte purposes under section 1.1208 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.1208. However, in order to permit a full exchange on the issues under consideration by the Commission, we have concluded that the public interest would be served by classifying this proceeding as permit-but-disclose under the ex parte rules. Accordingly, by this Public Notice, and pursuant to section 1.1200(a) of the Commission's rules, 47
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/OGC/Notices/1997/fcc97113.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/OGC/Notices/1997/fcc97113.txt http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/OGC/Notices/1997/fcc97113.wp
  • the term "comments" to refer to comments, reply comments, and other documents filed in notice and comment rulemaking proceedings prior to the reply comment deadline. 2 5 U.S.C. ' 553. Broadcast allotment proceedings are large in number and are therefore not included in this pilot program. In addition, they are restricted under the Commission's ex parte rules, 47 C.F.R. ' 1.1208, which increases the chances that electronic filings might not be properly served on the parties. Before the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20554 In the Matter of )) GC Docket No. 97-113 Electronic Filing of Documents ) in Rulemaking Proceedings ) NOTICE OF PROPOSED RULEMAKING Adopted: April 3, 1997 Released: April 7, 1997 By the Commission: I. INTRODUCTION 1. In
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/OGC/Orders/1998/fcc98056.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/OGC/Orders/1998/fcc98056.wp
  • West Comments at 4; CEMA Comments at 3. 26 12 FCC Rcd at 5150 n.1, 5153-54. 27 See Notice, 12 FCC Rcd 5150 n.2 (explaining that broadcast allotment proceedings are not included in the ECFS at this time because of the large numbers of such proceedings and because the are restricted under the Commission's ex parte rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.1208, which increases the chances that electronic filings might not be properly served on the parties). 28 Bell Atlantic/NYNEX Comments at 1-2 (petitions for rulemaking, NOIs, reconsideration, motions); NTCA Comments at 2 (petitions for rulemaking and NOIs); NAD Comments at 3 (pre-NPRM matters like NOIs); NECA Comments at 6 (petitions for reconsideration); U S West Comments at 2 (preliminary phase pleadings
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/OGC/Orders/1999/fcc99322.doc
  • Secretary publishes lists of ex parte presentations. Finally, the Commission clarified several aspects of the rules and codified some existing interpretations and policies. III. HOGAN & HARTSON PETITION 5. Pleadings. Hogan & Hartson questions the Commission's determination to make all proceedings restricted unless the proceeding has been specifically listed in the rules as exempt or permit-but-disclose. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.1208; 12 FCC Rcd at 7352 � 12. Hogan & Hartson contends that, instead, the Commission should treat as permit-but-disclose all proceedings except a narrow group of quasi-judicial proceedings, as the Commission had originally proposed in the notice of proposed rulemaking in this proceeding. See Amendment of 47 C.F.R. � 1.1200 , 10 FCC Rcd 3240, 3242 � 16, 3244 �
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Orders/2000/da000452.doc
  • market. Petitioners request that the Bureau require Motorola to provide facts to support its request for assignment of unconstructed authorizations, provide Petitioners and other parties an opportunity to review these facts, and then assess Motorola's request in light of the facts and relevant law. DISCUSSION We disagree with Petitioners' claim that Bureau staff violated the agency's ex parte rules. Section 1.1208 of our rules prohibits ex parte presentations, to or from Commission staff, in restricted proceedings, unless the presentation is exempt under Section 1.1204(b). Pursuant to Section 1.1204(b)(7), in force at the time the application was filed, ex parte communications by the Commission or staff requesting information to clarify or adduce evidence or to resolve issues were exempt from the ex
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Orders/2000/da000474.doc
  • short-form applications until after the high bidder makes the required down payment. 47 C.F.R. � 1.2105(c)(1). Counsel for High Plains contacted the Commission's staff on November 25, 1996, and High Plains filed its Emergency Motion on November 26, 1996. High Plains Opposition to Petition to Deny at 3-4 (filed April 8, 1997). Specifically, Mercury alleges that High Plains violated section 1.1208(b)(2) of the Commission's rules, which provides as follows: (b) No person shall make an ex parte presentation in a proceeding that could become restricted even though the proceeding is not restricted at the time if: . . . . (2) That person intends to file an opposition, complaint, or objection which would cause the proceeding to become restricted. 47 C.F.R.
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Public_Notices/1999/da990375.pdf
  • in all bidding consortia, joint ventures, partnerships, and other arrangements entered into relating to the competitive bidding process. Bidders found to have violated the anti-collusion rule may be subject to sanctions. 17 Ex Parte Rule: Applicants should also be aware that the Commission has generally exempted auction proceedings from the strict requirements of the ex parte rule (47 C.F.R. � 1.1208). 18 Because the short-form application (FCC Form 175) for Auction No. 22 of Leap raises issues that are also raised in an assignment application pending before the Bureau, which is a restricted proceeding under the ex parte rule, the Commission will treat Leap's short-form application as a restricted proceeding for purposes of ex parte communications.19 Mock Auction: All applicants found
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Public_Notices/1999/da990904.pdf
  • involved in all bidding consortia, joint ventures, partnerships, and other arrangements entered into relating to the competitive bidding process. Bidders found to have violated the anti-collusion rule may be subject to sanctions.10 Ex Parte Rule: Applicants should also be aware that the Commission has generally exempted auction proceedings from the strict requirements of the ex parte rule (47 C.F.R. � 1.1208).11 Mock Auction: All applicants found to be qualified bidders are eligible to participate in a mock electronic auction on Friday, June 4, 1999. The Bureau will issue a Public Notice announcing when software for the mock auction is posted on the World Wide Web and BBS. Remote Bidding Software: Applicants are reminded that qualified bidders are eligible to bid either
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Public_Notices/1999/da991800.pdf
  • involved in all bidding consortia, joint ventures, partnerships, and other arrangements entered into relating to the competitive bidding process.8 Bidders found to have violated the anti-collusion rule may be subject to sanctions.9 Ex Parte Rule: Applicants should also be aware that the Commission has generally exempted auction proceedings from the strict requirements of the ex parte rule (47 C.F.R. � 1.1208).10 Mock Auction: All applicants found to be qualified bidders are eligible to participate in a mock electronic auction on Friday, September 24, 1999. The Bureau will issue a Public Notice announcing when software for the mock auction will be posted on the World Wide Web and BBS. Bidder Alerts: All applicants must certify on their FCC Form 175 applications under
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Public_Notices/1999/da991986.doc
  • the Wireless Telecommunications Bureau, Federal Communications Commission, 445 Twelfth Street, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20554, Room 4-C207, (202) 418-0680. Copies may also be obtained from ITS, 1231 20th Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20036, (202) 857-3800. Requests for waiver of the Commission's Rules are subject, unless otherwise provided, to treatment by the Commission as restricted proceedings for ex parte purposes under Section 1.1208 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.1208. Because of the policy implications and the potential impact of this proceeding on other proceedings, as well as, persons not parties to the waiver requests, we believe it would be in the public interest to treat this case as a permit-but-disclose proceeding under the ex parte rules. Therefore, any ex parte presentations
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Public_Notices/2000/da000083.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Public_Notices/2000/da000083.txt
  • W., Room CY-A257, Washington, D. C. 20554. Copies also may be obtained from ITS. For further information regarding the public reference file for this Request, contact Maria Ringold, Chief, Wireless Branch, RIC, (202) 418-1350. Unless otherwise provided, requests for waiver of the Commission's Rules are subject to treatment by the Commission as restricted proceedings for ex parte purposes under Section 1.1208 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.1208. Because of the policy implications and potential impact of this proceeding on land mobile licensees not parties to the waiver request, we believe it would be in the public interest to treat this case as a permit-but-disclose proceeding under the ex parte rules. See 47 C.F.R. �� 1.1200(a), 1.1206. Therefore, subsequent to
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Public_Notices/2000/da000230.doc
  • Street, S.W., Room CY-A257, Washington, D.C. 20554. Copies also may be obtained from ITS. For further information regarding the public reference file for this Request, contact Maria Ringold, Chief, Wireless Branch, RIC, (202) 418-1350. Unless otherwise provided, requests for waiver of the Commission's Rules are subject to treatment by the Commission as restricted proceedings for ex parte purposes under Section 1.1208 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.1208. Because of the policy implications and potential impact of this proceeding on land mobile and public safety licensees not parties to the waiver request, we believe it would be in the public interest to treat this case as a permit-but-disclose proceeding under the ex parte rules. See 47 C.F.R. �� 1.1200(a), 1.1206.
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Public_Notices/2000/da000320.doc
  • of the policy implications and potential impact of this proceeding on persons not parties to this request, we believe it would be in the public interest to treat this case as a permit-but-disclose proceeding under the ex parte rules, see Sections 1.1200(a) and 1.1206 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.1200(a), 1.1206, rather than a restricted proceeding under Section 1.1208 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.1208. Therefore, any ex parte presentations that are made with respect to the issues involved in the subject request, subsequent to the release of this Public Notice, will be permissible but must be disclosed in accordance with the requirements of Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.1206(b). . By the
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Public_Notices/2000/da000402.doc
  • 445 Twelfth Street, S.W., Room CY-A257. Copies may also be obtained from ITS. For further information regarding the public reference file for this Waiver Request contact Maria Ringold, Chief, Wireless Branch, RIC, (202) 418-1350. Unless otherwise provided, requests for waiver of the Commission's Rules are subject to treatment by the Commission as restricted proceedings for ex parte purposes under Section 1.1208 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.1208. Because of the policy implications and potential impact of this proceeding on persons not parties to the waiver request, we believe it would be in the public interest to treat this case as a permit-but-disclose proceeding under the ex parte rules. See Sections 1.1200(a), 1.1206 of the Commission's Rules. 47 C.F.R.�� 1.1200(a),
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Public_Notices/2000/da000405.doc
  • involved in all bidding consortia, joint ventures, partnerships, and other arrangements entered into relating to the competitive bidding process. Bidders found to have violated the anti-collusion rule may be subject to sanctions. Ex Parte Rule: Applicants should also be aware that the Commission has generally exempted auction proceedings from the strict requirements of the ex parte rule (47 C.F.R. � 1.1208). Mock Auction: All applicants found to be qualified bidders are eligible to participate in a mock electronic auction on Friday, March 17, 2000. The Bureau will issue a public notice announcing when software for the mock auction will be posted on the World Wide Web. Remote Bidding Software: Applicants are reminded that qualified bidders are eligible to bid either electronically
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Public_Notices/2000/da000594.doc
  • involved in all bidding consortia, joint ventures, partnerships, and other arrangements entered into relating to the competitive bidding process. Bidders found to have violated the anti-collusion rule may be subject to sanctions. Ex Parte Rule: Applicants should also be aware that the Commission has generally exempted auction proceedings from the strict requirements of the ex parte rule (47 C.F.R. � 1.1208). Bidder Alert: All applicants certified on their FCC short-form (Form 175) applications under penalty of perjury that they were legally, technically, financially and otherwise qualified to hold a license, and not in default on any payment for Commission licenses (including down payments) or delinquent on any non-tax debt owed to any Federal agency. Prospective bidders are reminded that submission of
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Public_Notices/2000/da000863.doc
  • involved in all bidding consortia, joint ventures, partnerships, and other arrangements entered into relating to the competitive bidding process. Bidders found to have violated the anti-collusion rule may be subject to sanctions. Ex Parte Rule: Applicants should also be aware that the Commission has generally exempted auction proceedings from the strict requirements of the ex parte rule (47 C.F.R. � 1.1208). Bidder Alert: All applicants certified on their FCC short-form (Form 175) applications under penalty of perjury that they were legally, technically, financially and otherwise qualified to hold a license, and not in default on any payment for Commission licenses (including down payments) or delinquent on any non-tax debt owed to any Federal agency. Prospective bidders are reminded that submission of
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Public_Notices/2000/da000888.doc
  • 445 Twelfth Street, S.W., Room CY-A257. Copies may also be obtained from ITS. For further information regarding the public reference file for this Waiver Request contact Maria Ringold, Chief, Wireless Branch, RIC, (202) 418-0271. Unless otherwise provided, requests for waiver of the Commission's Rules are subject to treatment by the Commission as restricted proceedings for ex parte purposes under Section 1.1208 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.1208. Because of the policy implications and potential impact of this proceeding on persons not parties to the waiver request, we believe it would be in the public interest to treat this case as a permit-but-disclose proceeding under the ex parte rules. See Sections 1.1200(a), 1.1206 of the Commission's Rules. 47 C.F.R.�� 1.1200(a),
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Public_Notices/2000/da001171.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Public_Notices/2000/da001171.txt
  • of the policy implications and potential impact of this proceeding on persons not parties to this petition, we believe it would be in the public interest to treat this matter as a permit-but-disclose proceeding under the ex parte rules, see Sections 1.1200(a) and 1.1206 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.1200(a), 1.1206, rather than a restricted proceeding under Section 1.1208 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.1208. Therefore, any ex parte presentations that are made with respect to the issues involved in the subject petition, subsequent to the release of this Public Notice, will be permissible but must be disclosed in accordance with the requirements of Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.1206(b). . By the
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Public_Notices/2000/da001172.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Public_Notices/2000/da001172.txt
  • of the policy implications and potential impact of this proceeding on persons not parties to this request, we believe it would be in the public interest to treat this matter as a permit-but-disclose proceeding under the ex parte rules, see Sections 1.1200(a) and 1.1206 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.1200(a), 1.1206, rather than a restricted proceeding under Section 1.1208 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.1208. Therefore, any ex parte presentations that are made with respect to the issues involved in the subject request, subsequent to the release of this Public Notice, will be permissible but must be disclosed in accordance with the requirements of Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.1206(b). For further information,
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Public_Notices/2000/da001189.doc
  • Bureau (CIB), Federal Communications Commission, 445 Twelfth Street, S.W., Room CY-A257. Copies may also be obtained from ITS. For further information regarding the public reference file for this application contact Maria Ringold, Chief, Wireless Branch, RIC, (202) 418-0271. Unless otherwise provided, applications are subject to treatment by the Commission as restricted proceedings for ex parte purposes under 47 C.F.R. � 1.1208. Because of the policy implications and potential impact of this proceeding on persons not parties to the application, we believe it would be in the public interest to treat this matter as a permit-but-disclose proceeding under the ex parte rules. See 47 C.F.R. �� 1.1200(a), 1.1206. Therefore, subsequent to the release of this Public Notice, ex parte presentations that are
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Public_Notices/2000/da001405.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Public_Notices/2000/da001405.txt
  • CY-A257, Washington, D. C. 20554. Copies also may be obtained from ITS. For further information concerning the public reference file for this Request for Waiver, contact Maria Ringold, Chief, Wireless Branch, RIC, (202) 418-1350. Unless otherwise provided, requests for waiver of the Commission's Rules are subject to treatment by the Commission as restricted proceedings for ex parte purposes under Section 1.1208 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.1208. Because of the policy implications and potential impact of this proceeding on land mobile licensees not parties to the waiver request, we believe it would be in the public interest to treat this case as a permit-but-disclose proceeding under the ex parte rules. See 47 C.F.R. �� 1.1200(a), 1.1206. Therefore, subsequent to
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Public_Notices/2000/da001698.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Public_Notices/2000/da001698.txt
  • Room CY-A257, Washington, D.C. 20554. Copies also may be obtained from ITS. For further information concerning the public reference file for this Request for Waiver, contact Maria Ringold, Chief, Wireless Branch, RIC, (202) 418-1350. Unless otherwise provided, requests for waiver of the Commission's Rules are subject to treatment by the Commission as restricted proceedings for ex parte purposes under Section 1.1208 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.1208. Because of the policy implications and potential impact of persons not party to the waiver request, we believe it would be in the public interest to treat this case as a permit-but-disclose proceeding under the ex parte rules. See 47 C.F.R. �� 1.1200(a), 1.1206. Therefore, subsequent to the release of this Public
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Public_Notices/2000/da001699.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Public_Notices/2000/da001699.txt
  • Communications Commission, 445 Twelfth Street, S.W., Room CY-A257. Copies may also be obtained from ITS. For further information regarding the public reference file for this application contact Maria Ringold, Chief, Wireless Branch, RIC, (202) 418-1350. Unless otherwise provided, requests for Commission action are subject to treatment by the Commission as restricted proceedings for ex parte purposes under 47 C.F.R. � 1.1208. Because of the policy implications and potential impact of this proceeding on persons not parties to the application, we believe it would be in the public interest to treat this matter as a permit-but-disclose proceeding under the ex parte rules. See 47 C.F.R. �� 1.1200(a), 1.1206. Therefore, subsequent to the release of this Public Notice, ex parte presentations that are
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Public_Notices/2000/da001841.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Public_Notices/2000/da001841.txt
  • PDC asserts that its proposed service will be on a secondary, non-interfering basis to direct broadcast satellite services and on a co-primary basis with any fixed satellite services, such as that proposed by Skybridge. Requests for waiver of the Commission's Rules are subject, unless otherwise provided, to treatment by the Commission as restricted proceedings for ex parte purposes under Section 1.1208 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.1208. Because of the policy implications and the potential impact of this proceeding on other proceedings, as well as, persons not parties to the waiver requests, we believe it would be in the public interest to treat this case as a permit-but-disclose proceeding under the ex parte rules. Therefore, any ex parte presentations
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Public_Notices/2000/da001913.doc
  • 12th Street, S.W., CY-A257, Washington, D.C. 20554. Copies may also be obtained from ITS. For further information regarding the public reference file for this Request, contact Maria Ringold, Chief, Wireless Branch, RIC, (202) 418-1350. Unless otherwise provided, requests for waiver of the Commission's Rules are subject to treatment by the Commission as restricted proceedings for ex parte purposes under Section 1.1208 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.1208. Because of the policy implications and poltential impact of this proceeding on persons not parties to the waiver request, we believe it would be in the public interest to treat this case as a permit-but-disclose proceeding under the ex parte rules. See 47 C.F.R. �� 1.1200(a), 1.1206. Therefore, subsequent to the release
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Public_Notices/2000/da002134.doc
  • satellite) and other fixed microwave systems. SRL asserts that its proposed service will be on a secondary, non-interfering basis to DBS and on a co-primary basis with any other DBS spectrum sharing proposals submitted. Requests for waiver of the Commission's Rules are subject, unless otherwise provided, to treatment by the Commission as restricted proceedings for ex parte purposes under Section 1.1208 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.1208. Because of the policy implications and the potential impact of this proceeding on other proceedings, as well as, persons not parties to the waiver requests, we believe it would be in the public interest to treat this case as a permit-but-disclose proceeding under the ex parte rules. Therefore, any ex parte presentations
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Public_Notices/2000/da002167.doc
  • 445 Twelfth Street, S.W., Room CY-A257. Copies may also be obtained from ITS. For further information regarding the public reference file for these waiver requests contact Maria Ringold, Chief, Wireless Branch, RIC, (202) 418-1350. Unless otherwise provided, requests for waiver of the Commission's Rules are subject to treatment by the Commission as restricted proceedings for ex parte purposes under Section 1.1208 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.1208. Because of the policy implications and potential impact of this proceeding on persons not parties to the waiver requests, we believe it would be in the public interest to treat this case as a permit-but-disclose proceeding under the ex parte rules. See Sections 1.1200(a), 1.1206 of the Commission's Rules. 47 C.F.R.�� 1.1200(a),
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Public_Notices/2000/da002614.pdf
  • Hayes� compatible modem (56.6 kbps recommended) � Monitor: VGA or above � Mouse or other pointing device � Microsoft� Windows� 95� or 98� 12 47 C.F.R. �1.2109 (d). 13 See Qualcomm Incorporated Petition for Declaratory Ruling Giving Effect to the Mandate of the District of Columbia Circuit Court of Appeals, Order, FCC 00-189 (rel. June 8, 2000). 14 47 C.F.R. �1.1208. 15 See 47 C.F.R. �1.1200(a) note (1); see also "Commission Announces that Mutually Exclusive `Short-Form' Applications (Form 175) to Participate in Competitive Bidding Process (`Auctions') Are Treated as Exempt for Ex Parte Purposes," Public Notice, 9 FCC Rcd 6760 (1994). 6 � We recommend that you use Netscape� Communicator� 4.73. However, you can also use Netscape Communicator 4.5, 4.51, 4.61,
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Public_Notices/2000/da992765.doc
  • 445 Twelfth Street, S.W., Room CY-A257. Copies may also be obtained from ITS. For further information regarding the public reference file for this Waiver Request contact Maria Ringold, Chief, Wireless Branch, RIC, (202) 418-1350. Unless otherwise provided, requests for waiver of the Commission's Rules are subject to treatment by the Commission as restricted proceedings for ex parte purposes under Section 1.1208 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.1208. Because of the policy implications and potential impact of this proceeding on persons not parties to the waiver request, we believe it would be in the public interest to treat this case as a permit-but-disclose proceeding under the ex parte rules. See Sections 1.1200(a), 1.1206 of the Commission's Rules. 47 C.F.R.�� 1.1200(a),
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Public_Notices/2001/da010151.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Public_Notices/2001/da010151.txt
  • of the policy implications and potential impact of this proceeding on persons not parties to this request, we believe it would be in the public interest to treat this matter as a permit-but-disclose proceeding under the ex parte rules, see Sections 1.1200(a) and 1.1206 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.1200(a), 1.1206, rather than a restricted proceeding under Section 1.1208 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.1208. Therefore, any ex parte presentations that are made with respect to the issues involved in the subject request, subsequent to the release of this Public Notice, will be permissible but must be disclosed in accordance with the requirements of Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.1206(b). For further information,
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Public_Notices/2001/da010152.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Public_Notices/2001/da010152.txt
  • of the policy implications and potential impact of this proceeding on persons not parties to this request, we believe it would be in the public interest to treat this matter as a permit-but-disclose proceeding under the ex parte rules, see Sections 1.1200(a) and 1.1206 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.1200(a), 1.1206, rather than a restricted proceeding under Section 1.1208 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.1208. Therefore, any ex parte presentations that are made with respect to the issues involved in the subject request, subsequent to the release of this Public Notice, will be permissible but must be disclosed in accordance with the requirements of Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.1206(b). . By the
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Public_Notices/2001/da012660.html
  • Branch, RIC, (202) 418- 1355. Please note that the Verizon waiver request and NCS statement can be found on the internet at the following URL addresses: Waiver request - [4]http://wireless.fcc.gov/releases/011102-verizon_petition.pdf NCS statement - [5]http://wireless.fcc.gov/releases/011102-ncs_statement.pdf Unless otherwise provided, requests for waiver of the Commission's Rules are subject to treatment by the Commission as restricted proceedings for ex parte purposes under Section 1.1208 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. 1.1208. Therefore, ex parte presentations to or from Commission decision-making personnel are prohibited until this proceeding is no longer subject to administrative reconsideration or review or judicial review. For further information, contact Karen Franklin, Esq. of the Policy and Rules Branch of the Public Safety and Private Wireless Division of the Wireless Telecommunications Bureau
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2001/fcc01285.html http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2001/fcc01285.pdf
  • Sprint to Joint Motion, File Nos. EB-01-MD-001, 002 (filed Aug. 10, 2001) at 2 (noting that ``[a]ll three parties to this proceeding have elected to seek judicial review of the [BTI] Order in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit''). 11 47 C.F.R. 1.1202(a). 12 47 C.F.R. 1.1202(b). 13 47 C.F.R. 1.1202(c), 1.1206. 14 47 C.F.R. 1.1208, 1.1204. 15 47 U.S.C. 208. 16 47 C.F.R. 1.1208, 1.1206, 1.1204. 17 See, e.g., Letter from Alexander P. Starr, Chief, Market Disputes Resolution Division, Enforcement Bureau, to James F. Bendernagel, Counsel for AT&T, Jonathan E. Canis, Counsel for BTI, and Cheryl A. Tritt, Counsel for Sprint, File Nos. EB-01- MD-001, 002 (Jan. 18, 2001). 18 47 C.F.R. 1.1202, 1.1208. See,
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2003/FCC-03-107A1.html
  • the Bureau. Qwest's responses included correspondence dated January 10, 15, and 31, and February 3 and 11, 2003. 14 Qwest provided further information in correspondence dated March 11, 2003 and in response to questions from the staff. 15 Because of the nexus between the formal complaints and the Investigation, the Bureau treated the Investigation as a restricted proceeding under section 1.1208 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 1.1208. As a result, the Bureau included Touch America in correspondence between Qwest and the Commission. Pursuant to section 1.1204(a)(10) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 1.1204(a)(10), the Commission and Qwest conducted bi-lateral settlement discussions. All of the information provided by Qwest during those settlement discussions ``relat[ed] to how a proceeding should or could
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2009/DA-09-719A1.html
  • action against a regional wireless carrier, MetroPCS, for refusing to pay North County Communications for use of its network as the FCC's rules require." Id. at 1 (emphasis added). Id. Formal complaints are made restricted by 47 C.F.R. S:S: 1.1202(d)(2) (stating that parties to a formal complaint are parties to a proceeding for purposes of the ex parte rules) and 1.1208 (stating that proceedings not otherwise designated are restricted). Ex parte presentations to and from Commission decision-makers are prohibited in restricted proceedings. See 47 C.F.R. S: 1.1208. The resolution of this issue was made in consultation with the Commission's Office of General Counsel, in accordance with 47 C.F.R. S: 0.251(g). See Letter from David Senzel, Attorney-Advisor, Office of General Counsel, FCC,
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2011/DA-11-1731A1.html
  • federal court litigation, in light of the All American Order, or Qwest will move the court to dismiss those claims with prejudice." Id. at 2. AT&T Corp. v. Business Telecom, Inc., Order on Reconsideration, 16 FCC Rcd 21750 (2001) ("AT&T v. BTI"). Id., 16 FCC Rcd at 21752-53, P:P: 6-7. Aventure Petition for Reconsideration at 3. See 47 C.F.R. S: 1.1208 (Restricted Proceedings). Qwest Petition to Accept Filing at 1. Id. at 3. Commission rule 1.106(b)(1) addresses petitions for reconsideration filed by persons who are not parties to the proceeding. 47 C.F.R. S: 1.106(b). It does not speak to non-parties' attempts to file oppositions to petitions for reconsideration. 47 C.F.R. S: 1.223(b). See Teleconnect Co. v. The Bell Company of Pennsylvania,
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2011/FCC-11-148A1.html
  • the Commission has held that "to grant non-party requests to reconsider Commission adjudicatory orders based upon the [precedential effect of an adjudicatory order] would open the `floodgates' to non-party participation in adjudicatory proceedings, and thus effectively convert every adjudicatory proceeding into a rulemaking proceeding." Id. at 21753, P: 7 (citations omitted). Aventure Petition at 5. See 47 C.F.R. S:S: 1.1202(b), 1.1208. See http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/mdrd/c208.html. We note that Aventure does not claim that it lacked awareness of this proceeding. Indeed, counsel for Aventure and counsel for Northern Valley are partners on the twelve-person "Telecommunications Team" in the same law firm. See http://www.arentfox.com/practices/telecom/index.cfm?fa=team. (Continued from previous page) (continued...) Federal Communications Commission FCC 11-148 1 4 Federal Communications Commission FCC 11-148 References 1. http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-148A1.pdf 2.
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Public_Notices/DA-04-2034A1.html
  • program.3 A copy of NEC's waiver request, plea agreement, and supplement to the waiver request is attached to this Public Notice. We seek comment on NEC BNS's petition, in light of the novel relief that it requests. Requests for waiver of the Commission's rules are subject to treatment by the Commission as restricted proceedings for ex parte purposes under section 1.1208 of the Commission's rules unless otherwise provided.4 Because this request may implicate broadly applicable policy issues, we believe it would be in the public interest to treat this case as a permit-but-disclose proceeding under the ex parte rules.5 Ex parte presentations that are made with respect to the issues involved in the petition will be allowed but must be disclosed
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Public_Notices/DA-04-402A1.html
  • continue to treat this matter as not subject to the ex parte rules2 until such time as further developments (e.g., any issuance of a notice of apparent liability for forfeiture) would render the proceeding restricted.3 For further information, contact William D. Freedman at (202) 418-1415. Action by Chief, Investigations and Hearings Division, Enforcement Bureau _________________________ 1 See 47 C.F.R. 1.1202(d)(2), 1.1208. 2 See 47 C.F.R. 1.1200(a). 3 See 47 C.F.R. 1.1202(d)(3), 1.1208. References 1. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-402A1.pdf 2. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-402A1.doc
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-06-1593A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-06-1593A1.pdf
  • District (SDCCD) filed an application to modify the facilities of noncommercial educational Station KSDS(FM), San Diego, California. SDCCD proposes to upgrade KSDS(FM) from Class A to Class B1 and to increase effective radiated power to 22 kW. Applications for broadcast authorizations are subject, unless otherwise provided, to treatment by the Commission as restricted proceedings for ex parte purposes under Section 1.1208 of the Commission's rules. 47 C.F.R. � 1.1208. We have concluded, however, that classifying this proceeding as permit-but-disclose would, in this case, serve the public interest. Accordingly, by this Public Notice, and pursuant to Section 1.1200(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.1200(a), we announce that the ex parte procedures applicable to nonrestricted proceedings will govern our consideration of
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-1952A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-1952A1.pdf
  • pursuant to the authority delegated under 47 C.F.R. � 0.283, that the Petition for Relief and Sanctions filed October 20, 2005, by R B Schools IS GRANTED in part and DENIED in part, and all related pleadings ARE DISMISSED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Millikin University IS HEREBY ADMONISHED for its apparent willful and repeated violations of 47 C.F.R. �� 1.1208 and 1.1210. We caution Millikin University to be and remain more diligent in the future regarding compliance with the Rules. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that that the application (File No. BNPED-20041101AHW) of R B Schools for a construction permit for a new time-sharing NCE-FM station at Decatur, Illinois, IS DISMISSED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that that the application (File No.
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-09-1796A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-09-1796A1.pdf
  • and Zwirn responses to an Enforcement Bureau letter of inquiry leaving Cherry unable to file a ``meaningful opposition'' to the assignment to the Receiver or to participate fully in the Commission's consideration of the alleged Section 310(d) violation. Cherry contends that his being denied ``notice or opportunity . . . to participate'' is also a violation of Sections 1.1206 and 1.1208 of the ex parte Rules. Finally, Cherry asserts that rather than retaliate against him, the Commission should grant his request for ``an injunction against the transfer by the FCC of any formerly held [Tama] licenses . . . .'' In opposition, the Receiver claims that Cherry's Objection is just one of a ``long, ever-growing list of frivolous'' filings and that
• http://www.fcc.gov/ogc/documents/opinions/1996/oregon.html http://www.fcc.gov/ogc/documents/opinions/1996/oregon.wp
  • competing with that of the Foundation. On January 2, 1990 the Foundation sent a letter to the FCC asking that its application be deleted from the cut-off list issued on December 28, 1989. The Foundation did not send a copy of this letter to Oregon, in apparent violation of the Commission's regulations governing ex parte communications. See 47 C.F.R. 1.1202(b); 1.1208(a). On January 12 the Commission issued an erratum stating that the Foundation's application "was listed inadvertently on [the "A" list], released December 28, 1989 and is hereby deleted." Although it was aware of the January 10 cut-off date in the "A" list published on December 6, Oregon did not file its own application for the Redding station until January 29,
• http://www.fcc.gov/ogc/documents/opinions/1997/keller.html http://www.fcc.gov/ogc/documents/opinions/1997/keller.wp
  • that decision bars agencies from relying on evidence submitted at different stages of the administrative process. Keller's only remaining claim is that Lewisville violated the Commission's ex parte rules by forwarding a copy of the Gramm letter to the Commission but not to Keller. Those rules prohibit ex parte communications between parties and the Commission in "restricted proceedings." 47 C.F.R. 1.1208 (1996). The parties disagree about whether the coexistence of the Keller and Lewisville applications created a "restricted proceeding." We need not resolve that issue, however, because although Lewisville's letter may have inspired the Commission to dismiss Keller's finder's preference request, the Commission could not possibly have awarded Keller the license--Keller's preference request was fatally premature. Whether the proceedings were restricted
• http://www.fcc.gov/ogc/documents/opinions/2000/98-1516.doc http://www.fcc.gov/ogc/documents/opinions/2000/98-1516.html
  • ALJ. }{\i\fs22\insrsid744098 See}{\fs22\insrsid744098 discussion }{\i\fs22\insrsid744098 infra}{\fs22\insrsid744098 Part III.}}}{\fs22\insrsid744098 The ex parte rules prohibit a party in specified proceedings (including the proceedings at issue here) from making written presentations to the Commission without serving them on the other parties, and from making oral presentations without notice and an opportunity for the others to be present. }{\i\fs22\insrsid744098 See}{\fs22\insrsid744098 47 C.F.R. \'a7\'a7 1.1202, 1.1208. They also provide that "[n]o person shall solicit or encourage others to make any presentation which he or she is prohibited from making...." }{\i\fs22\insrsid744098 Id.}{\fs22\insrsid744098 \'a7 1.1210. \par \par \tab In a radio conversation with another amateur operator, Schoenbohm was tape recorded as saying: \par \par }\pard \ql \li1440\ri1440\nowidctlpar\faauto\adjustright\rin1440\lin1440\itap0 {\fs22\insrsid744098 I'm not allowed under ex\_parte rules to ask for assistance
• http://www.fcc.gov/ogc/documents/opinions/2002/00-1292.doc http://www.fcc.gov/ogc/documents/opinions/2002/00-1292.html http://www.fcc.gov/ogc/documents/opinions/2002/00-1292.pdf
  • we reject summarily the appellant's other arguments; aimed only at showing the agency was wrong, they have not the power to persuade that the agency was unreasonable. C. The Ex Parte Rules With certain exceptions clearly not applicable here, the Commission prohibits "ex parte presentations" during the pendency of an administrative adjudication and any subsequent judicial review. 47 C.F.R. � 1.1208. The regulations define a "presentation" as a "communication directed to the merits or outcome of a proceeding." Id. at � 1.1202(a). A written presentation is "ex parte" if it is "not served on the parties to the proceeding." Id. at � 1.1202(b). Thus, a written presentation comes within the prohibition of the rules only if it is both "directed to
• http://www.fcc.gov/transaction/nbc-telemundo/da012689.pdf
  • No. 25106) announcing that the applications had been accepted for filing and establishing a pleading cycle to permit interested parties an opportunity to comment on the proposed transaction. Applications for consent to the transfer of control of broadcast licenses and authorizations are subject, unless otherwise provided, to treatment by the Commission as restricted proceedings for ex parte purposes under Section 1.1208 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �1.1208. However, in order to permit a full exchange on the multiple issues under consideration by the Commission, we have concluded that the public interest would be served by classifying this proceeding as permit-but-disclose under the ex parte rules. Accordingly, by this Public Notice, and pursuant to Section 1.1200(a) of the Commission's rules, 47