FCC Web Documents citing 1.120

as compiled by hallikainen.com/FccRules on 2011 12 01

• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1467A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1467A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1467A1.txt
  • a petition for reconsideration requesting reinstatement nunc pro tunc within 30 days, provided that the amendment is minor and does not alter the fair distribution preference. See 47 C.F.R. � 73.3522(b)(1). A tentative selectee that is unable to cure the defect is disqualified. See 5 U.S.C. �� 702, 704, 706; 47 U.S.C. �� 309(d), 402(b), 405; 47 C.F.R. �� 1.106-08, 1.120, 73.7004. In cases that involve separate mutually exclusive groups but present common issues, the petitions or appeals may be filed jointly or may be consolidated at the discretion of the Commission or the court. See, e.g., FED. R. APP. P. 3(b). Federal Communications Commission DA 08-1467 Federal Communications Commission DA 08-1467 � tm � � � Y ] � �
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1537A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1537A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1537A1.txt
  • a petition for reconsideration requesting reinstatement nunc pro tunc within 30 days, provided that the amendment is minor and does not alter the fair distribution preference. See 47 C.F.R. � 73.3522(b)(1). A tentative selectee that is unable to cure the defect is disqualified. See 5 U.S.C. �� 702, 704, 706; 47 U.S.C. �� 309(d), 402(b), 405; 47 C.F.R. �� 1.106-08, 1.120, 73.7004. In cases that involve separate mutually exclusive groups but present common issues, the petitions or appeals may be filed jointly or may be consolidated at the discretion of the Commission or the court. See, e.g., FED. R. APP. P. 3(b). Federal Communications Commission DA 08-1537 Federal Communications Commission DA 08-1537 0 1 � � � � � � �
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1949A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1949A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1949A1.txt
  • a petition for reconsideration requesting reinstatement nunc pro tunc within 30 days, provided that the amendment is minor and does not alter the fair distribution preference. See 47 C.F.R. � 73.3522(b)(1). A tentative selectee that is unable to cure the defect is disqualified. See 5 U.S.C. �� 702, 704, 706; 47 U.S.C. �� 309(d), 402(b), 405; 47 C.F.R. �� 1.106-08, 1.120, 73.7004. In cases that involve separate mutually exclusive groups but present common issues, the petitions or appeals may be filed jointly or may be consolidated at the discretion of the Commission or the court. See, e.g., FED. R. APP. P. 3(b). Federal Communications Commission DA 08-1949 Federal Communications Commission DA 08-1949 S T � � _H _H � K l
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2717A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2717A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2717A1.txt
  • a petition for reconsideration requesting reinstatement nunc pro tunc within 30 days, provided that the amendment is minor and does not alter the fair distribution preference. See 47 C.F.R. � 73.3522(b)(1). A tentative selectee that is unable to cure the defect is disqualified. See 5 U.S.C. �� 702, 704, 706; 47 U.S.C. �� 309(d), 402(b), 405; 47 C.F.R. �� 1.106-08, 1.120, 73.7004. In cases that involve separate mutually exclusive groups but present common issues, the petitions or appeals may be filed jointly or may be consolidated at the discretion of the Commission or the court. See, e.g., FED. R. APP. P. 3(b). Federal Communications Commission DA 08-2717 Federal Communications Commission DA 08-2717 # $ � � � 6 Q } �
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2172A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2172A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2172A1.txt
  • tunc within 30 days. The amendment must be minor and may not alter the fair distribution preference. See 47 C.F.R. � 73.3522(b)(1). The staff will not reinstate the application of a tentative selectee that is unable to cure all defects. See 5 U.S.C. �� 702, 704, and 706; 47 U.S.C. �� 309(d), 402(b), and 405; 47 C.F.R. �� 1.106-08, 1.115, 1.120, and 73.7004. In cases that involve separate mutually exclusive groups but present common issues, the petitions or appeals may be filed jointly or may be consolidated at the discretion of the Commission or the court. See, e.g., FED. R. APP. P. 3(b). Federal Communications Commission DA 09-2172 Federal Communications Commission DA 09-2172 . / � � � � � �
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2381A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2381A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2381A1.txt
  • tunc within 30 days. The amendment must be minor and may not alter the fair distribution preference. See 47 C.F.R. � 73.3522(b)(1). The staff will not reinstate the application of a tentative selectee that is unable to cure all defects. See 5 U.S.C. �� 702, 704, and 706; 47 U.S.C. �� 309(d), 402(b), and 405; 47 C.F.R. �� 1.106-08, 1.115, 1.120, and 73.7004. In cases that involve separate mutually exclusive groups but present common issues, the petitions or appeals may be filed jointly or may be consolidated at the discretion of the Commission or the court. See, e.g., FED. R. APP. P. 3(b). Federal Communications Commission DA 09-2381 Federal Communications Commission DA 09-2381 � � � � � � 0 0
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2596A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2596A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2596A1.txt
  • tunc within 30 days. The amendment must be minor and may not alter the fair distribution preference. See 47 C.F.R. � 73.3522(b)(1). The staff will not reinstate the application of a tentative selectee that is unable to cure all defects. See 5 U.S.C. �� 702, 704, and 706; 47 U.S.C. �� 309(d), 402(b), and 405; 47 C.F.R. �� 1.106-08, 1.115, 1.120, and 73.7004. In cases that involve separate mutually exclusive groups but present common issues, the petitions or appeals may be filed jointly or may be consolidated at the discretion of the Commission or the court. See, e.g., FED. R. APP. P. 3(b). Federal Communications Commission DA 09-2596 Federal Communications Commission DA 09-2596 - � � � � � � (R)
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-53A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-53A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-53A1.txt
  • Cable programming service 78 45.4 1.308 67 47.5 1.310 Expanded basic service 78 72.3 1.002 67 73.3 1.240 Wireless MVPD subgroup Basic cable service 33 23.7 0.947 32 23.3 0.788 Cable programming service 33 50.2 0.975 32 50.3 0.969 Expanded basic service 33 73.9 0.787 32 73.6 0.620 Low penetration test subgroup Basic cable service 68 23.1 1.104 66 23.0 1.120 Cable programming service 68 47.8 1.186 66 47.8 1.229 Expanded basic service 68 70.8 0.919 66 70.8 0.910 Source: 2007/2008 cable price survey. Attachment 10 Other Programming Channels January 1, 2006 Sample Group Local Broadcast Stations in HD Format (1) Most Highly Subscribed Digital Tier (2) N Mean S.E. N Mean S.E. Sample groups overall 754 4.3 0.08 725 40.6
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-735A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-735A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-735A1.txt
  • tunc within 30 days. The amendment must be minor and may not alter the fair distribution preference. See 47 C.F.R. � 73.3522(b)(1). The staff will not reinstate the application of a tentative selectee that is unable to cure all defects. See 5 U.S.C. �� 702, 704, and 706; 47 U.S.C. �� 309(d), 402(b), and 405; 47 C.F.R. �� 1.106-08, 1.115, 1.120, and 73.7004. In cases that involve separate mutually exclusive groups but present common issues, the petitions or appeals may be filed jointly or may be consolidated at the discretion of the Commission or the court. See, e.g., FED. R. APP. P. 3(b). Federal Communications Commission DA 09-735 Federal Communications Commission DA 09-735 ... � � � � � � �
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2072A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2072A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2072A1.txt
  • C.F.R. � 73.3522(b)(1). The staff will not reinstate the application of a tentative selectee that is unable to cure all defects. See id. � 1.106 (a) (1). See also Patrick J. Vaughn, Esq., Letter, 22 FCC Rcd 11165 (MB 2007). See 5 U.S.C. �� 702, 704, and 706; 47 U.S.C. �� 309(d), 402(b), and 405; 47 C.F.R. �� 1.106-08, 1.115, 1.120, and 73.7004. In cases that involve separate mutually exclusive groups but present common issues, the petitions or appeals may be filed jointly or may be consolidated at the discretion of the Commission or the court. See, e.g., FED. R. APP. P. 3(b). Federal Communications Commission DA 10-2072 Federal Communications Commission DA 10-2072 ` a � � � � � 0
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1658A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1658A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1658A1.txt
  • amends the following rules in Part 1, Subpart A, General Rules of Practice and Procedure, to delete an obsolete rule and obsolete references, as follows: Section 1.115(b)(2), which pertains to applications for review of actions taken pursuant to delegated authority, is amended to delete ``Except as provided in paragraph (b)(5) of this section'' because paragraph (b)(5) has been deleted. Section 1.120, which describes the Commission's former ``protest'' process, is deleted because, by its express terms, it does not apply to applications filed on or after December 12, 1960. As a result, this section is without current legal effect and is obsolete. In addition, this Order deletes references to section 1.120 from other rules. Specifically, in section 1.4(h), the reference to section
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-310874A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-310874A1.txt
  • Fund) and the TRS Fund administrator's performance after two years (i.e. in 1995). Removed note that certain provisions of the rule are not effective until OMB approval. OMB approval received August 2000. 64.604(c)(5)(iii)(J) 64.2401, removed [Note] 10/13/11 Describes the Commission's former "protest" process. By its express terms, it does not apply to applications filed on or after December 12, 1960. 1.120 Adopted 9/30/11 pending FR publication These sections pertain to comparative hearings for broadcast license renewal applications. The enactment of section 309(k) of the Communications Act of 1934 eliminated comparative broadcast hearings for license renewal applicants. 1.227 (b)(6) 1.229(b)(2) Adopted 9/30/11 pending FR publication Pertains to comparative hearings involving applicants for new commercial broadcast facilities and calls for the production of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-40A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-40A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-40A1.txt
  • finds a new or novel question; or (3) finds a substantial and material question of fact). The Commission or Administrative Law Judge would then resolve new and novel or substantial and material factual matters and, if necessary, conduct a new comparative point hearing. See 5 U.S.C. �� 702, 704, 706; 47 U.S.C. �� 309(d), 402(b), 405; 47 C.F.R. �� 1.106-08, 1.120, 73.7004. In cases that involve separate mutually exclusive groups but present common issues, the petitions or appeals may be filed jointly or may be consolidated at the discretion of the Commission or the court. See, e.g., FED. R. APP. P. 3(b). 47 C.F.R. � 73.3004. The ``no'' designation is used when applicants propose to serve different communities, but each certifies
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-29A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-29A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-29A1.txt
  • selected application following point hearing, and award of permit on a non-comparative basis to only remaining acceptable applicant). See generally NCE Omnibus, 22 FCC Rcd at 6162 n.230 (2007) (standards for staff evaluation of petitions). See NCE MO&O, 16 FCC Rcd at 5104-05. See 5 U.S.C. �� 702, 704, 706; 47 U.S.C. �� 309(d), 402(b), 405; 47 C.F.R. �� 1.106-08, 1.120, 73.7004. In cases that involve separate mutually exclusive groups but present common issues, the petitions or appeals may be filed jointly or may be consolidated at the discretion of the Commission or the court. See, e.g., FED. R. APP. P. 3(b). The ``no'' designation is used when applicants propose to serve different communities, but each certifies that it would not
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-69A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-69A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-69A1.txt
  • (permitting staff dismissal of defective application tentatively selected in a point hearing, and staff award of permit on a non-comparative basis to only remaining acceptable applicant). See generally NCE Omnibus, 22 FCC Rcd at 6162 n.230 (2007) (standards for staff evaluation of petitions). See 5 U.S.C. �� 702, 704, 706; 47 U.S.C. �� 309(d), 402(b), 405; 47 C.F.R. �� 1.106-08, 1.120, 73.7004. In cases that involve separate mutually exclusive groups but present common issues, the petitions or appeals may be filed jointly or may be consolidated at the discretion of the Commission or a reviewing court. See, e.g., FED. R. APP. P. 3(b). The ``no'' designation is used when applicants propose to serve different communities, but each certifies that it would
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-9A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-9A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-9A1.txt
  • permitting staff dismissal of defective application tentatively selected in a point hearing, and staff award of permit on a non-comparative basis to only remaining acceptable applicant). See generally NCE Omnibus, 22 FCC Rcd at 6162 n.230 (2007) (standards for staff evaluation of petitions). See 5 U.S.C. �� 702, 704, 706; 47 U.S.C. �� 309(d), 402(b), 405; 47 C.F.R. �� 1.106-08, 1.120, 73.7004. In cases that involve separate mutually exclusive groups but present common issues, the petitions or appeals may be filed jointly or may be consolidated at the discretion of the Commission or a reviewing court. See, e.g., FED. R. APP. P. 3(b). The ``no'' designation is used when applicants propose to serve different communities, but each certifies that it would
• http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/OGC/Orders/1998/fcc98056.pdf http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/OGC/Orders/1998/fcc98056.wp
  • Commission regulation and the document is in fact served by mail (see � 1.47(f)), and the filing period for a response is 10 days or less, an additional 3 days (excluding holidays) will be allowed to all parties in the proceeding for filing a response. This paragraph (� 1.4(h)) shall not apply to documents filed pursuant to � 1.89, � 1.120(d), � 1.315(b) or � 1.316. For purposes of this paragraph service by facsimile or by electronic means shall be deemed equivalent to hand delivery. 6. Section 1.46 is amended by revising paragraphs (b) and (c) to read as follows: � 1.46 Motions for extension of time. * * * * * (b) Motions for extension of time in which to
• http://transition.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/FCC-07-40A1.doc http://transition.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/FCC-07-40A1.pdf
  • finds a new or novel question; or (3) finds a substantial and material question of fact). The Commission or Administrative Law Judge would then resolve new and novel or substantial and material factual matters and, if necessary, conduct a new comparative point hearing. See 5 U.S.C. �� 702, 704, 706; 47 U.S.C. �� 309(d), 402(b), 405; 47 C.F.R. �� 1.106-08, 1.120, 73.7004. In cases that involve separate mutually exclusive groups but present common issues, the petitions or appeals may be filed jointly or may be consolidated at the discretion of the Commission or the court. See, e.g., FED. R. APP. P. 3(b). 47 C.F.R. � 73.3004. The ``no'' designation is used when applicants propose to serve different communities, but each certifies
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/16/releases/da981138.pdf http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/16/releases/da981138.txt http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/16/releases/da981138.wp
  • prime interest to Nextel, and, in Federal Communications Commission DA 98-1138 32 Id. at 9. 33 See 47 C.F.R. � 1.2105(c); see also Mercury PCS I, 12 FCC Rcd. 17970 (WTB, 1997) (Mercury) (winning bidder in PCS auction assessed fine for bid signaling strategies). Nextel Opposition at 10. 34 35 Id. 36 See para. 3, supra. 37 47 C.F.R. � 1.120(c). See CMRS Second Report and Order, 9 FCC Rcd. 2348, 2386-87 (1994) (anti-collusion rule adopted). 38 39 See Mercury, 12 FCC Rcd. at 17977 at n.31. 40 Id. at n.30. 41 Id. at n.32. 5 exchange, Nextel would yield certain A block licenses to competing bidders. IE cites Nextel's conduct in the 32 Reno EA as illustrative of its allegations.
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/commoperators/element6.doc
  • water D.None of the above 6A294 C An Edison storage battery should not be charged at less than the manufacturer's specified rate: A.In order that the capacity of the battery shall be maximum after charge B.The chemical reactions of the Edison-type cell C.A & B D.None of the above 6A295 D Your emergency battery has a specific gravity reading of 1.120. What should be done? A.Place the battery on charge at once B.Bring the electrolyte level to about 1/4 inch above the top of the plates C.The battery will be fully charged when the specific gravity reads 1.280 to 1.300 D.All of the above 6A296 A What care should be taken with selecting water to add to a storage cell? A.It
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Cable/Orders/2000/da002228.doc
  • refund amount that differs from the calculation prescribed in the Refund Order. Operator did not file a petition for reconsideration or an application for review of the Refund Order. Consequently, Operator is attempting to raise in its refund plan an issue that it failed to properly place before the Commission in accordance with the Commission's rules. See Sections 1.101 - 1.120 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.101 - 1.120. A refund plan is not a substitute for the reconsideration and review process and issues raised in refund plans will not be considered. See also, In the Matter of Marcus Cable Associates, L.P., 12 FCC Rcd 19526 (1997). Federal Communications Commission DA 00-2228 Federal Communications Commission DA 00-2228 a b
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Cable/Orders/2000/da002388.doc
  • cable programming service tier ("CPST") subscribers for the period stated in the Refund Order and file a report with the Chief, Cable Services Bureau, stating the cumulative refund amount determined (including franchise fees and interest), describing the calculation thereof, and describing its plan to implement the refund within 60 days of Commission approval of the plan. See Sections 1.101 - 1.120 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.101 - 1.120. See also, In the Matter of Marcus Cable Associates, L.P., 12 FCC Rcd 19526 (1997). See In the Matter of Cencom Cable Income Partners II, LP, 12 FCC Rcd 7948 (1997). 8 FCC Rcd 5631 (1993). Cencom at � 22 (footnote omitted). We calculated a principal amount of $3,145.70 for
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Intl/4361-98.pdf
  • 9.0 0.0 9,407,23425.7 0.618.717.038.1 Israel $175,485,42957.1 0.424.716.5 1.2 $51,101,33253.2 0.024.022.3 0.4 $2,877,38878.4 0.014.3 6.3 1.1 393,264,98149.0 1.222.524.5 2.8 Jordan $40,585,75448.7 1.523.2 9.217.5 $4,820,44945.6 0.036.115.1 3.1 $599,11341.3 0.022.423.812.5 58,412,78535.9 3.126.311.623.1 Kuwait $53,219,05461.8 0.617.818.1 1.7 $6,765,93025.3 0.037.936.2 0.6 $11,962,07791.7 0.0 4.6 3.6 0.1 59,485,65749.3 0.924.523.0 2.3 Lebanon $51,341,29746.0 3.111.7 7.431.7 $5,989,54729.8 0.047.8 0.022.4 $3,407,20560.3 0.036.4 0.0 3.4 68,918,36725.5 4.112.7 7.250.5 Oman $6,450,78955.5 1.120.415.1 7.9 $1,813,28569.4 0.019.010.7 0.9 $1,057,69775.7 0.012.511.9 0.0 7,791,56052.6 1.323.114.7 8.3 Qatar $6,492,02065.1 0.520.6 9.2 4.7 $3,341,50654.0 0.037.2 8.8 0.0 $2,793,50912.9 0.018.768.4 0.0 9,268,09058.8 0.625.5 9.2 5.8 Saudi Arabia $115,692,73267.2 0.612.3 9.010.8 $35,610,07229.1 0.048.920.4 1.7 $6,865,38678.7 0.019.5 1.8 0.0 156,537,94550.2 0.823.110.915.0 Syria $16,282,54052.1 2.924.3 6.314.4 $3,161,32633.8 0.023.428.114.7 $2,296,07175.1 0.010.5 3.411.1 20,353,01430.3 4.213.8 8.543.2 United Arab Emirates $50,402,82960.5 0.820.8 8.9 9.0 $26,781,98135.0
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/OGC/Orders/1998/fcc98056.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/OGC/Orders/1998/fcc98056.wp
  • Commission regulation and the document is in fact served by mail (see � 1.47(f)), and the filing period for a response is 10 days or less, an additional 3 days (excluding holidays) will be allowed to all parties in the proceeding for filing a response. This paragraph (� 1.4(h)) shall not apply to documents filed pursuant to � 1.89, � 1.120(d), � 1.315(b) or � 1.316. For purposes of this paragraph service by facsimile or by electronic means shall be deemed equivalent to hand delivery. 6. Section 1.46 is amended by revising paragraphs (b) and (c) to read as follows: � 1.46 Motions for extension of time. * * * * * (b) Motions for extension of time in which to
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-08-1467A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-08-1467A1.pdf
  • a petition for reconsideration requesting reinstatement nunc pro tunc within 30 days, provided that the amendment is minor and does not alter the fair distribution preference. See 47 C.F.R. � 73.3522(b)(1). A tentative selectee that is unable to cure the defect is disqualified. See 5 U.S.C. �� 702, 704, 706; 47 U.S.C. �� 309(d), 402(b), 405; 47 C.F.R. �� 1.106-08, 1.120, 73.7004. In cases that involve separate mutually exclusive groups but present common issues, the petitions or appeals may be filed jointly or may be consolidated at the discretion of the Commission or the court. See, e.g., FED. R. APP. P. 3(b). Federal Communications Commission DA 08-1467 Federal Communications Commission DA 08-1467 � tm � � � Y ] � �
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-09-2172A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-09-2172A1.pdf
  • tunc within 30 days. The amendment must be minor and may not alter the fair distribution preference. See 47 C.F.R. � 73.3522(b)(1). The staff will not reinstate the application of a tentative selectee that is unable to cure all defects. See 5 U.S.C. �� 702, 704, and 706; 47 U.S.C. �� 309(d), 402(b), and 405; 47 C.F.R. �� 1.106-08, 1.115, 1.120, and 73.7004. In cases that involve separate mutually exclusive groups but present common issues, the petitions or appeals may be filed jointly or may be consolidated at the discretion of the Commission or the court. See, e.g., FED. R. APP. P. 3(b). Federal Communications Commission DA 09-2172 Federal Communications Commission DA 09-2172 . / � � � � � �
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-09-2596A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-09-2596A1.pdf
  • tunc within 30 days. The amendment must be minor and may not alter the fair distribution preference. See 47 C.F.R. � 73.3522(b)(1). The staff will not reinstate the application of a tentative selectee that is unable to cure all defects. See 5 U.S.C. �� 702, 704, and 706; 47 U.S.C. �� 309(d), 402(b), and 405; 47 C.F.R. �� 1.106-08, 1.115, 1.120, and 73.7004. In cases that involve separate mutually exclusive groups but present common issues, the petitions or appeals may be filed jointly or may be consolidated at the discretion of the Commission or the court. See, e.g., FED. R. APP. P. 3(b). Federal Communications Commission DA 09-2596 Federal Communications Commission DA 09-2596 - � � � � � � (R)
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-09-735A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-09-735A1.pdf
  • tunc within 30 days. The amendment must be minor and may not alter the fair distribution preference. See 47 C.F.R. � 73.3522(b)(1). The staff will not reinstate the application of a tentative selectee that is unable to cure all defects. See 5 U.S.C. �� 702, 704, and 706; 47 U.S.C. �� 309(d), 402(b), and 405; 47 C.F.R. �� 1.106-08, 1.115, 1.120, and 73.7004. In cases that involve separate mutually exclusive groups but present common issues, the petitions or appeals may be filed jointly or may be consolidated at the discretion of the Commission or the court. See, e.g., FED. R. APP. P. 3(b). Federal Communications Commission DA 09-735 Federal Communications Commission DA 09-735 ... � � � � � � �
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/FCC-07-40A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/FCC-07-40A1.pdf
  • finds a new or novel question; or (3) finds a substantial and material question of fact). The Commission or Administrative Law Judge would then resolve new and novel or substantial and material factual matters and, if necessary, conduct a new comparative point hearing. See 5 U.S.C. �� 702, 704, 706; 47 U.S.C. �� 309(d), 402(b), 405; 47 C.F.R. �� 1.106-08, 1.120, 73.7004. In cases that involve separate mutually exclusive groups but present common issues, the petitions or appeals may be filed jointly or may be consolidated at the discretion of the Commission or the court. See, e.g., FED. R. APP. P. 3(b). 47 C.F.R. � 73.3004. The ``no'' designation is used when applicants propose to serve different communities, but each certifies
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1467A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1467A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1467A1.txt
  • a petition for reconsideration requesting reinstatement nunc pro tunc within 30 days, provided that the amendment is minor and does not alter the fair distribution preference. See 47 C.F.R. � 73.3522(b)(1). A tentative selectee that is unable to cure the defect is disqualified. See 5 U.S.C. �� 702, 704, 706; 47 U.S.C. �� 309(d), 402(b), 405; 47 C.F.R. �� 1.106-08, 1.120, 73.7004. In cases that involve separate mutually exclusive groups but present common issues, the petitions or appeals may be filed jointly or may be consolidated at the discretion of the Commission or the court. See, e.g., FED. R. APP. P. 3(b). Federal Communications Commission DA 08-1467 Federal Communications Commission DA 08-1467 � tm � � � Y ] � �
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1537A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1537A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1537A1.txt
  • a petition for reconsideration requesting reinstatement nunc pro tunc within 30 days, provided that the amendment is minor and does not alter the fair distribution preference. See 47 C.F.R. � 73.3522(b)(1). A tentative selectee that is unable to cure the defect is disqualified. See 5 U.S.C. �� 702, 704, 706; 47 U.S.C. �� 309(d), 402(b), 405; 47 C.F.R. �� 1.106-08, 1.120, 73.7004. In cases that involve separate mutually exclusive groups but present common issues, the petitions or appeals may be filed jointly or may be consolidated at the discretion of the Commission or the court. See, e.g., FED. R. APP. P. 3(b). Federal Communications Commission DA 08-1537 Federal Communications Commission DA 08-1537 0 1 � � � � � � �
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1949A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1949A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1949A1.txt
  • a petition for reconsideration requesting reinstatement nunc pro tunc within 30 days, provided that the amendment is minor and does not alter the fair distribution preference. See 47 C.F.R. � 73.3522(b)(1). A tentative selectee that is unable to cure the defect is disqualified. See 5 U.S.C. �� 702, 704, 706; 47 U.S.C. �� 309(d), 402(b), 405; 47 C.F.R. �� 1.106-08, 1.120, 73.7004. In cases that involve separate mutually exclusive groups but present common issues, the petitions or appeals may be filed jointly or may be consolidated at the discretion of the Commission or the court. See, e.g., FED. R. APP. P. 3(b). Federal Communications Commission DA 08-1949 Federal Communications Commission DA 08-1949 S T � � _H _H � K l
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2717A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2717A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2717A1.txt
  • a petition for reconsideration requesting reinstatement nunc pro tunc within 30 days, provided that the amendment is minor and does not alter the fair distribution preference. See 47 C.F.R. � 73.3522(b)(1). A tentative selectee that is unable to cure the defect is disqualified. See 5 U.S.C. �� 702, 704, 706; 47 U.S.C. �� 309(d), 402(b), 405; 47 C.F.R. �� 1.106-08, 1.120, 73.7004. In cases that involve separate mutually exclusive groups but present common issues, the petitions or appeals may be filed jointly or may be consolidated at the discretion of the Commission or the court. See, e.g., FED. R. APP. P. 3(b). Federal Communications Commission DA 08-2717 Federal Communications Commission DA 08-2717 # $ � � � 6 Q } �
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2172A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2172A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2172A1.txt
  • tunc within 30 days. The amendment must be minor and may not alter the fair distribution preference. See 47 C.F.R. � 73.3522(b)(1). The staff will not reinstate the application of a tentative selectee that is unable to cure all defects. See 5 U.S.C. �� 702, 704, and 706; 47 U.S.C. �� 309(d), 402(b), and 405; 47 C.F.R. �� 1.106-08, 1.115, 1.120, and 73.7004. In cases that involve separate mutually exclusive groups but present common issues, the petitions or appeals may be filed jointly or may be consolidated at the discretion of the Commission or the court. See, e.g., FED. R. APP. P. 3(b). Federal Communications Commission DA 09-2172 Federal Communications Commission DA 09-2172 . / � � � � � �
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2381A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2381A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2381A1.txt
  • tunc within 30 days. The amendment must be minor and may not alter the fair distribution preference. See 47 C.F.R. � 73.3522(b)(1). The staff will not reinstate the application of a tentative selectee that is unable to cure all defects. See 5 U.S.C. �� 702, 704, and 706; 47 U.S.C. �� 309(d), 402(b), and 405; 47 C.F.R. �� 1.106-08, 1.115, 1.120, and 73.7004. In cases that involve separate mutually exclusive groups but present common issues, the petitions or appeals may be filed jointly or may be consolidated at the discretion of the Commission or the court. See, e.g., FED. R. APP. P. 3(b). Federal Communications Commission DA 09-2381 Federal Communications Commission DA 09-2381 � � � � � � 0 0
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2596A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2596A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2596A1.txt
  • tunc within 30 days. The amendment must be minor and may not alter the fair distribution preference. See 47 C.F.R. � 73.3522(b)(1). The staff will not reinstate the application of a tentative selectee that is unable to cure all defects. See 5 U.S.C. �� 702, 704, and 706; 47 U.S.C. �� 309(d), 402(b), and 405; 47 C.F.R. �� 1.106-08, 1.115, 1.120, and 73.7004. In cases that involve separate mutually exclusive groups but present common issues, the petitions or appeals may be filed jointly or may be consolidated at the discretion of the Commission or the court. See, e.g., FED. R. APP. P. 3(b). Federal Communications Commission DA 09-2596 Federal Communications Commission DA 09-2596 - � � � � � � (R)
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-53A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-53A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-53A1.txt
  • Cable programming service 78 45.4 1.308 67 47.5 1.310 Expanded basic service 78 72.3 1.002 67 73.3 1.240 Wireless MVPD subgroup Basic cable service 33 23.7 0.947 32 23.3 0.788 Cable programming service 33 50.2 0.975 32 50.3 0.969 Expanded basic service 33 73.9 0.787 32 73.6 0.620 Low penetration test subgroup Basic cable service 68 23.1 1.104 66 23.0 1.120 Cable programming service 68 47.8 1.186 66 47.8 1.229 Expanded basic service 68 70.8 0.919 66 70.8 0.910 Source: 2007/2008 cable price survey. Attachment 10 Other Programming Channels January 1, 2006 Sample Group Local Broadcast Stations in HD Format (1) Most Highly Subscribed Digital Tier (2) N Mean S.E. N Mean S.E. Sample groups overall 754 4.3 0.08 725 40.6
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-735A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-735A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-735A1.txt
  • tunc within 30 days. The amendment must be minor and may not alter the fair distribution preference. See 47 C.F.R. � 73.3522(b)(1). The staff will not reinstate the application of a tentative selectee that is unable to cure all defects. See 5 U.S.C. �� 702, 704, and 706; 47 U.S.C. �� 309(d), 402(b), and 405; 47 C.F.R. �� 1.106-08, 1.115, 1.120, and 73.7004. In cases that involve separate mutually exclusive groups but present common issues, the petitions or appeals may be filed jointly or may be consolidated at the discretion of the Commission or the court. See, e.g., FED. R. APP. P. 3(b). Federal Communications Commission DA 09-735 Federal Communications Commission DA 09-735 ... � � � � � � �
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2072A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2072A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2072A1.txt
  • C.F.R. � 73.3522(b)(1). The staff will not reinstate the application of a tentative selectee that is unable to cure all defects. See id. � 1.106 (a) (1). See also Patrick J. Vaughn, Esq., Letter, 22 FCC Rcd 11165 (MB 2007). See 5 U.S.C. �� 702, 704, and 706; 47 U.S.C. �� 309(d), 402(b), and 405; 47 C.F.R. �� 1.106-08, 1.115, 1.120, and 73.7004. In cases that involve separate mutually exclusive groups but present common issues, the petitions or appeals may be filed jointly or may be consolidated at the discretion of the Commission or the court. See, e.g., FED. R. APP. P. 3(b). Federal Communications Commission DA 10-2072 Federal Communications Commission DA 10-2072 ` a � � � � � 0
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1658A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1658A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1658A1.txt
  • amends the following rules in Part 1, Subpart A, General Rules of Practice and Procedure, to delete an obsolete rule and obsolete references, as follows: Section 1.115(b)(2), which pertains to applications for review of actions taken pursuant to delegated authority, is amended to delete ``Except as provided in paragraph (b)(5) of this section'' because paragraph (b)(5) has been deleted. Section 1.120, which describes the Commission's former ``protest'' process, is deleted because, by its express terms, it does not apply to applications filed on or after December 12, 1960. As a result, this section is without current legal effect and is obsolete. In addition, this Order deletes references to section 1.120 from other rules. Specifically, in section 1.4(h), the reference to section
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-310874A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-310874A1.txt
  • Fund) and the TRS Fund administrator's performance after two years (i.e. in 1995). Removed note that certain provisions of the rule are not effective until OMB approval. OMB approval received August 2000. 64.604(c)(5)(iii)(J) 64.2401, removed [Note] 10/13/11 Describes the Commission's former "protest" process. By its express terms, it does not apply to applications filed on or after December 12, 1960. 1.120 Adopted 9/30/11 pending FR publication These sections pertain to comparative hearings for broadcast license renewal applications. The enactment of section 309(k) of the Communications Act of 1934 eliminated comparative broadcast hearings for license renewal applicants. 1.227 (b)(6) 1.229(b)(2) Adopted 9/30/11 pending FR publication Pertains to comparative hearings involving applicants for new commercial broadcast facilities and calls for the production of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-40A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-40A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-40A1.txt
  • finds a new or novel question; or (3) finds a substantial and material question of fact). The Commission or Administrative Law Judge would then resolve new and novel or substantial and material factual matters and, if necessary, conduct a new comparative point hearing. See 5 U.S.C. �� 702, 704, 706; 47 U.S.C. �� 309(d), 402(b), 405; 47 C.F.R. �� 1.106-08, 1.120, 73.7004. In cases that involve separate mutually exclusive groups but present common issues, the petitions or appeals may be filed jointly or may be consolidated at the discretion of the Commission or the court. See, e.g., FED. R. APP. P. 3(b). 47 C.F.R. � 73.3004. The ``no'' designation is used when applicants propose to serve different communities, but each certifies
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-29A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-29A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-29A1.txt
  • selected application following point hearing, and award of permit on a non-comparative basis to only remaining acceptable applicant). See generally NCE Omnibus, 22 FCC Rcd at 6162 n.230 (2007) (standards for staff evaluation of petitions). See NCE MO&O, 16 FCC Rcd at 5104-05. See 5 U.S.C. �� 702, 704, 706; 47 U.S.C. �� 309(d), 402(b), 405; 47 C.F.R. �� 1.106-08, 1.120, 73.7004. In cases that involve separate mutually exclusive groups but present common issues, the petitions or appeals may be filed jointly or may be consolidated at the discretion of the Commission or the court. See, e.g., FED. R. APP. P. 3(b). The ``no'' designation is used when applicants propose to serve different communities, but each certifies that it would not
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-69A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-69A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-69A1.txt
  • (permitting staff dismissal of defective application tentatively selected in a point hearing, and staff award of permit on a non-comparative basis to only remaining acceptable applicant). See generally NCE Omnibus, 22 FCC Rcd at 6162 n.230 (2007) (standards for staff evaluation of petitions). See 5 U.S.C. �� 702, 704, 706; 47 U.S.C. �� 309(d), 402(b), 405; 47 C.F.R. �� 1.106-08, 1.120, 73.7004. In cases that involve separate mutually exclusive groups but present common issues, the petitions or appeals may be filed jointly or may be consolidated at the discretion of the Commission or a reviewing court. See, e.g., FED. R. APP. P. 3(b). The ``no'' designation is used when applicants propose to serve different communities, but each certifies that it would
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-9A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-9A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-9A1.txt
  • permitting staff dismissal of defective application tentatively selected in a point hearing, and staff award of permit on a non-comparative basis to only remaining acceptable applicant). See generally NCE Omnibus, 22 FCC Rcd at 6162 n.230 (2007) (standards for staff evaluation of petitions). See 5 U.S.C. �� 702, 704, 706; 47 U.S.C. �� 309(d), 402(b), 405; 47 C.F.R. �� 1.106-08, 1.120, 73.7004. In cases that involve separate mutually exclusive groups but present common issues, the petitions or appeals may be filed jointly or may be consolidated at the discretion of the Commission or a reviewing court. See, e.g., FED. R. APP. P. 3(b). The ``no'' designation is used when applicants propose to serve different communities, but each certifies that it would
• http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/OGC/Orders/1998/fcc98056.pdf http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/OGC/Orders/1998/fcc98056.wp
  • Commission regulation and the document is in fact served by mail (see � 1.47(f)), and the filing period for a response is 10 days or less, an additional 3 days (excluding holidays) will be allowed to all parties in the proceeding for filing a response. This paragraph (� 1.4(h)) shall not apply to documents filed pursuant to � 1.89, � 1.120(d), � 1.315(b) or � 1.316. For purposes of this paragraph service by facsimile or by electronic means shall be deemed equivalent to hand delivery. 6. Section 1.46 is amended by revising paragraphs (b) and (c) to read as follows: � 1.46 Motions for extension of time. * * * * * (b) Motions for extension of time in which to
• http://transition.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/FCC-07-40A1.doc http://transition.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/FCC-07-40A1.pdf
  • finds a new or novel question; or (3) finds a substantial and material question of fact). The Commission or Administrative Law Judge would then resolve new and novel or substantial and material factual matters and, if necessary, conduct a new comparative point hearing. See 5 U.S.C. �� 702, 704, 706; 47 U.S.C. �� 309(d), 402(b), 405; 47 C.F.R. �� 1.106-08, 1.120, 73.7004. In cases that involve separate mutually exclusive groups but present common issues, the petitions or appeals may be filed jointly or may be consolidated at the discretion of the Commission or the court. See, e.g., FED. R. APP. P. 3(b). 47 C.F.R. � 73.3004. The ``no'' designation is used when applicants propose to serve different communities, but each certifies
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/16/releases/da981138.pdf http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/16/releases/da981138.txt http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/16/releases/da981138.wp
  • prime interest to Nextel, and, in Federal Communications Commission DA 98-1138 32 Id. at 9. 33 See 47 C.F.R. � 1.2105(c); see also Mercury PCS I, 12 FCC Rcd. 17970 (WTB, 1997) (Mercury) (winning bidder in PCS auction assessed fine for bid signaling strategies). Nextel Opposition at 10. 34 35 Id. 36 See para. 3, supra. 37 47 C.F.R. � 1.120(c). See CMRS Second Report and Order, 9 FCC Rcd. 2348, 2386-87 (1994) (anti-collusion rule adopted). 38 39 See Mercury, 12 FCC Rcd. at 17977 at n.31. 40 Id. at n.30. 41 Id. at n.32. 5 exchange, Nextel would yield certain A block licenses to competing bidders. IE cites Nextel's conduct in the 32 Reno EA as illustrative of its allegations.
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/commoperators/element6.doc
  • water D.None of the above 6A294 C An Edison storage battery should not be charged at less than the manufacturer's specified rate: A.In order that the capacity of the battery shall be maximum after charge B.The chemical reactions of the Edison-type cell C.A & B D.None of the above 6A295 D Your emergency battery has a specific gravity reading of 1.120. What should be done? A.Place the battery on charge at once B.Bring the electrolyte level to about 1/4 inch above the top of the plates C.The battery will be fully charged when the specific gravity reads 1.280 to 1.300 D.All of the above 6A296 A What care should be taken with selecting water to add to a storage cell? A.It
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Intl/4361-98.pdf
  • 9.0 0.0 9,407,23425.7 0.618.717.038.1 Israel $175,485,42957.1 0.424.716.5 1.2 $51,101,33253.2 0.024.022.3 0.4 $2,877,38878.4 0.014.3 6.3 1.1 393,264,98149.0 1.222.524.5 2.8 Jordan $40,585,75448.7 1.523.2 9.217.5 $4,820,44945.6 0.036.115.1 3.1 $599,11341.3 0.022.423.812.5 58,412,78535.9 3.126.311.623.1 Kuwait $53,219,05461.8 0.617.818.1 1.7 $6,765,93025.3 0.037.936.2 0.6 $11,962,07791.7 0.0 4.6 3.6 0.1 59,485,65749.3 0.924.523.0 2.3 Lebanon $51,341,29746.0 3.111.7 7.431.7 $5,989,54729.8 0.047.8 0.022.4 $3,407,20560.3 0.036.4 0.0 3.4 68,918,36725.5 4.112.7 7.250.5 Oman $6,450,78955.5 1.120.415.1 7.9 $1,813,28569.4 0.019.010.7 0.9 $1,057,69775.7 0.012.511.9 0.0 7,791,56052.6 1.323.114.7 8.3 Qatar $6,492,02065.1 0.520.6 9.2 4.7 $3,341,50654.0 0.037.2 8.8 0.0 $2,793,50912.9 0.018.768.4 0.0 9,268,09058.8 0.625.5 9.2 5.8 Saudi Arabia $115,692,73267.2 0.612.3 9.010.8 $35,610,07229.1 0.048.920.4 1.7 $6,865,38678.7 0.019.5 1.8 0.0 156,537,94550.2 0.823.110.915.0 Syria $16,282,54052.1 2.924.3 6.314.4 $3,161,32633.8 0.023.428.114.7 $2,296,07175.1 0.010.5 3.411.1 20,353,01430.3 4.213.8 8.543.2 United Arab Emirates $50,402,82960.5 0.820.8 8.9 9.0 $26,781,98135.0
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-08-1467A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-08-1467A1.pdf
  • a petition for reconsideration requesting reinstatement nunc pro tunc within 30 days, provided that the amendment is minor and does not alter the fair distribution preference. See 47 C.F.R. � 73.3522(b)(1). A tentative selectee that is unable to cure the defect is disqualified. See 5 U.S.C. �� 702, 704, 706; 47 U.S.C. �� 309(d), 402(b), 405; 47 C.F.R. �� 1.106-08, 1.120, 73.7004. In cases that involve separate mutually exclusive groups but present common issues, the petitions or appeals may be filed jointly or may be consolidated at the discretion of the Commission or the court. See, e.g., FED. R. APP. P. 3(b). Federal Communications Commission DA 08-1467 Federal Communications Commission DA 08-1467 � tm � � � Y ] � �
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-09-2172A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-09-2172A1.pdf
  • tunc within 30 days. The amendment must be minor and may not alter the fair distribution preference. See 47 C.F.R. � 73.3522(b)(1). The staff will not reinstate the application of a tentative selectee that is unable to cure all defects. See 5 U.S.C. �� 702, 704, and 706; 47 U.S.C. �� 309(d), 402(b), and 405; 47 C.F.R. �� 1.106-08, 1.115, 1.120, and 73.7004. In cases that involve separate mutually exclusive groups but present common issues, the petitions or appeals may be filed jointly or may be consolidated at the discretion of the Commission or the court. See, e.g., FED. R. APP. P. 3(b). Federal Communications Commission DA 09-2172 Federal Communications Commission DA 09-2172 . / � � � � � �
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-09-2596A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-09-2596A1.pdf
  • tunc within 30 days. The amendment must be minor and may not alter the fair distribution preference. See 47 C.F.R. � 73.3522(b)(1). The staff will not reinstate the application of a tentative selectee that is unable to cure all defects. See 5 U.S.C. �� 702, 704, and 706; 47 U.S.C. �� 309(d), 402(b), and 405; 47 C.F.R. �� 1.106-08, 1.115, 1.120, and 73.7004. In cases that involve separate mutually exclusive groups but present common issues, the petitions or appeals may be filed jointly or may be consolidated at the discretion of the Commission or the court. See, e.g., FED. R. APP. P. 3(b). Federal Communications Commission DA 09-2596 Federal Communications Commission DA 09-2596 - � � � � � � (R)
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-09-735A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-09-735A1.pdf
  • tunc within 30 days. The amendment must be minor and may not alter the fair distribution preference. See 47 C.F.R. � 73.3522(b)(1). The staff will not reinstate the application of a tentative selectee that is unable to cure all defects. See 5 U.S.C. �� 702, 704, and 706; 47 U.S.C. �� 309(d), 402(b), and 405; 47 C.F.R. �� 1.106-08, 1.115, 1.120, and 73.7004. In cases that involve separate mutually exclusive groups but present common issues, the petitions or appeals may be filed jointly or may be consolidated at the discretion of the Commission or the court. See, e.g., FED. R. APP. P. 3(b). Federal Communications Commission DA 09-735 Federal Communications Commission DA 09-735 ... � � � � � � �
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/FCC-07-40A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/FCC-07-40A1.pdf
  • finds a new or novel question; or (3) finds a substantial and material question of fact). The Commission or Administrative Law Judge would then resolve new and novel or substantial and material factual matters and, if necessary, conduct a new comparative point hearing. See 5 U.S.C. �� 702, 704, 706; 47 U.S.C. �� 309(d), 402(b), 405; 47 C.F.R. �� 1.106-08, 1.120, 73.7004. In cases that involve separate mutually exclusive groups but present common issues, the petitions or appeals may be filed jointly or may be consolidated at the discretion of the Commission or the court. See, e.g., FED. R. APP. P. 3(b). 47 C.F.R. � 73.3004. The ``no'' designation is used when applicants propose to serve different communities, but each certifies
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1467A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1467A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1467A1.txt
  • a petition for reconsideration requesting reinstatement nunc pro tunc within 30 days, provided that the amendment is minor and does not alter the fair distribution preference. See 47 C.F.R. � 73.3522(b)(1). A tentative selectee that is unable to cure the defect is disqualified. See 5 U.S.C. �� 702, 704, 706; 47 U.S.C. �� 309(d), 402(b), 405; 47 C.F.R. �� 1.106-08, 1.120, 73.7004. In cases that involve separate mutually exclusive groups but present common issues, the petitions or appeals may be filed jointly or may be consolidated at the discretion of the Commission or the court. See, e.g., FED. R. APP. P. 3(b). Federal Communications Commission DA 08-1467 Federal Communications Commission DA 08-1467 � tm � � � Y ] � �
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1537A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1537A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1537A1.txt
  • a petition for reconsideration requesting reinstatement nunc pro tunc within 30 days, provided that the amendment is minor and does not alter the fair distribution preference. See 47 C.F.R. � 73.3522(b)(1). A tentative selectee that is unable to cure the defect is disqualified. See 5 U.S.C. �� 702, 704, 706; 47 U.S.C. �� 309(d), 402(b), 405; 47 C.F.R. �� 1.106-08, 1.120, 73.7004. In cases that involve separate mutually exclusive groups but present common issues, the petitions or appeals may be filed jointly or may be consolidated at the discretion of the Commission or the court. See, e.g., FED. R. APP. P. 3(b). Federal Communications Commission DA 08-1537 Federal Communications Commission DA 08-1537 0 1 � � � � � � �
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1949A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1949A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1949A1.txt
  • a petition for reconsideration requesting reinstatement nunc pro tunc within 30 days, provided that the amendment is minor and does not alter the fair distribution preference. See 47 C.F.R. � 73.3522(b)(1). A tentative selectee that is unable to cure the defect is disqualified. See 5 U.S.C. �� 702, 704, 706; 47 U.S.C. �� 309(d), 402(b), 405; 47 C.F.R. �� 1.106-08, 1.120, 73.7004. In cases that involve separate mutually exclusive groups but present common issues, the petitions or appeals may be filed jointly or may be consolidated at the discretion of the Commission or the court. See, e.g., FED. R. APP. P. 3(b). Federal Communications Commission DA 08-1949 Federal Communications Commission DA 08-1949 S T � � _H _H � K l
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2717A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2717A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2717A1.txt
  • a petition for reconsideration requesting reinstatement nunc pro tunc within 30 days, provided that the amendment is minor and does not alter the fair distribution preference. See 47 C.F.R. � 73.3522(b)(1). A tentative selectee that is unable to cure the defect is disqualified. See 5 U.S.C. �� 702, 704, 706; 47 U.S.C. �� 309(d), 402(b), 405; 47 C.F.R. �� 1.106-08, 1.120, 73.7004. In cases that involve separate mutually exclusive groups but present common issues, the petitions or appeals may be filed jointly or may be consolidated at the discretion of the Commission or the court. See, e.g., FED. R. APP. P. 3(b). Federal Communications Commission DA 08-2717 Federal Communications Commission DA 08-2717 # $ � � � 6 Q } �
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2172A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2172A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2172A1.txt
  • tunc within 30 days. The amendment must be minor and may not alter the fair distribution preference. See 47 C.F.R. � 73.3522(b)(1). The staff will not reinstate the application of a tentative selectee that is unable to cure all defects. See 5 U.S.C. �� 702, 704, and 706; 47 U.S.C. �� 309(d), 402(b), and 405; 47 C.F.R. �� 1.106-08, 1.115, 1.120, and 73.7004. In cases that involve separate mutually exclusive groups but present common issues, the petitions or appeals may be filed jointly or may be consolidated at the discretion of the Commission or the court. See, e.g., FED. R. APP. P. 3(b). Federal Communications Commission DA 09-2172 Federal Communications Commission DA 09-2172 . / � � � � � �
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2381A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2381A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2381A1.txt
  • tunc within 30 days. The amendment must be minor and may not alter the fair distribution preference. See 47 C.F.R. � 73.3522(b)(1). The staff will not reinstate the application of a tentative selectee that is unable to cure all defects. See 5 U.S.C. �� 702, 704, and 706; 47 U.S.C. �� 309(d), 402(b), and 405; 47 C.F.R. �� 1.106-08, 1.115, 1.120, and 73.7004. In cases that involve separate mutually exclusive groups but present common issues, the petitions or appeals may be filed jointly or may be consolidated at the discretion of the Commission or the court. See, e.g., FED. R. APP. P. 3(b). Federal Communications Commission DA 09-2381 Federal Communications Commission DA 09-2381 � � � � � � 0 0
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2596A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2596A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2596A1.txt
  • tunc within 30 days. The amendment must be minor and may not alter the fair distribution preference. See 47 C.F.R. � 73.3522(b)(1). The staff will not reinstate the application of a tentative selectee that is unable to cure all defects. See 5 U.S.C. �� 702, 704, and 706; 47 U.S.C. �� 309(d), 402(b), and 405; 47 C.F.R. �� 1.106-08, 1.115, 1.120, and 73.7004. In cases that involve separate mutually exclusive groups but present common issues, the petitions or appeals may be filed jointly or may be consolidated at the discretion of the Commission or the court. See, e.g., FED. R. APP. P. 3(b). Federal Communications Commission DA 09-2596 Federal Communications Commission DA 09-2596 - � � � � � � (R)
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-53A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-53A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-53A1.txt
  • Cable programming service 78 45.4 1.308 67 47.5 1.310 Expanded basic service 78 72.3 1.002 67 73.3 1.240 Wireless MVPD subgroup Basic cable service 33 23.7 0.947 32 23.3 0.788 Cable programming service 33 50.2 0.975 32 50.3 0.969 Expanded basic service 33 73.9 0.787 32 73.6 0.620 Low penetration test subgroup Basic cable service 68 23.1 1.104 66 23.0 1.120 Cable programming service 68 47.8 1.186 66 47.8 1.229 Expanded basic service 68 70.8 0.919 66 70.8 0.910 Source: 2007/2008 cable price survey. Attachment 10 Other Programming Channels January 1, 2006 Sample Group Local Broadcast Stations in HD Format (1) Most Highly Subscribed Digital Tier (2) N Mean S.E. N Mean S.E. Sample groups overall 754 4.3 0.08 725 40.6
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-735A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-735A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-735A1.txt
  • tunc within 30 days. The amendment must be minor and may not alter the fair distribution preference. See 47 C.F.R. � 73.3522(b)(1). The staff will not reinstate the application of a tentative selectee that is unable to cure all defects. See 5 U.S.C. �� 702, 704, and 706; 47 U.S.C. �� 309(d), 402(b), and 405; 47 C.F.R. �� 1.106-08, 1.115, 1.120, and 73.7004. In cases that involve separate mutually exclusive groups but present common issues, the petitions or appeals may be filed jointly or may be consolidated at the discretion of the Commission or the court. See, e.g., FED. R. APP. P. 3(b). Federal Communications Commission DA 09-735 Federal Communications Commission DA 09-735 ... � � � � � � �
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2072A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2072A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2072A1.txt
  • C.F.R. � 73.3522(b)(1). The staff will not reinstate the application of a tentative selectee that is unable to cure all defects. See id. � 1.106 (a) (1). See also Patrick J. Vaughn, Esq., Letter, 22 FCC Rcd 11165 (MB 2007). See 5 U.S.C. �� 702, 704, and 706; 47 U.S.C. �� 309(d), 402(b), and 405; 47 C.F.R. �� 1.106-08, 1.115, 1.120, and 73.7004. In cases that involve separate mutually exclusive groups but present common issues, the petitions or appeals may be filed jointly or may be consolidated at the discretion of the Commission or the court. See, e.g., FED. R. APP. P. 3(b). Federal Communications Commission DA 10-2072 Federal Communications Commission DA 10-2072 ` a � � � � � 0
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1658A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1658A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1658A1.txt
  • amends the following rules in Part 1, Subpart A, General Rules of Practice and Procedure, to delete an obsolete rule and obsolete references, as follows: Section 1.115(b)(2), which pertains to applications for review of actions taken pursuant to delegated authority, is amended to delete ``Except as provided in paragraph (b)(5) of this section'' because paragraph (b)(5) has been deleted. Section 1.120, which describes the Commission's former ``protest'' process, is deleted because, by its express terms, it does not apply to applications filed on or after December 12, 1960. As a result, this section is without current legal effect and is obsolete. In addition, this Order deletes references to section 1.120 from other rules. Specifically, in section 1.4(h), the reference to section
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-310874A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-310874A1.txt
  • Fund) and the TRS Fund administrator's performance after two years (i.e. in 1995). Removed note that certain provisions of the rule are not effective until OMB approval. OMB approval received August 2000. 64.604(c)(5)(iii)(J) 64.2401, removed [Note] 10/13/11 Describes the Commission's former "protest" process. By its express terms, it does not apply to applications filed on or after December 12, 1960. 1.120 Adopted 9/30/11 pending FR publication These sections pertain to comparative hearings for broadcast license renewal applications. The enactment of section 309(k) of the Communications Act of 1934 eliminated comparative broadcast hearings for license renewal applicants. 1.227 (b)(6) 1.229(b)(2) Adopted 9/30/11 pending FR publication Pertains to comparative hearings involving applicants for new commercial broadcast facilities and calls for the production of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-40A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-40A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-40A1.txt
  • finds a new or novel question; or (3) finds a substantial and material question of fact). The Commission or Administrative Law Judge would then resolve new and novel or substantial and material factual matters and, if necessary, conduct a new comparative point hearing. See 5 U.S.C. �� 702, 704, 706; 47 U.S.C. �� 309(d), 402(b), 405; 47 C.F.R. �� 1.106-08, 1.120, 73.7004. In cases that involve separate mutually exclusive groups but present common issues, the petitions or appeals may be filed jointly or may be consolidated at the discretion of the Commission or the court. See, e.g., FED. R. APP. P. 3(b). 47 C.F.R. � 73.3004. The ``no'' designation is used when applicants propose to serve different communities, but each certifies
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-29A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-29A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-29A1.txt
  • selected application following point hearing, and award of permit on a non-comparative basis to only remaining acceptable applicant). See generally NCE Omnibus, 22 FCC Rcd at 6162 n.230 (2007) (standards for staff evaluation of petitions). See NCE MO&O, 16 FCC Rcd at 5104-05. See 5 U.S.C. �� 702, 704, 706; 47 U.S.C. �� 309(d), 402(b), 405; 47 C.F.R. �� 1.106-08, 1.120, 73.7004. In cases that involve separate mutually exclusive groups but present common issues, the petitions or appeals may be filed jointly or may be consolidated at the discretion of the Commission or the court. See, e.g., FED. R. APP. P. 3(b). The ``no'' designation is used when applicants propose to serve different communities, but each certifies that it would not
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-69A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-69A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-69A1.txt
  • (permitting staff dismissal of defective application tentatively selected in a point hearing, and staff award of permit on a non-comparative basis to only remaining acceptable applicant). See generally NCE Omnibus, 22 FCC Rcd at 6162 n.230 (2007) (standards for staff evaluation of petitions). See 5 U.S.C. �� 702, 704, 706; 47 U.S.C. �� 309(d), 402(b), 405; 47 C.F.R. �� 1.106-08, 1.120, 73.7004. In cases that involve separate mutually exclusive groups but present common issues, the petitions or appeals may be filed jointly or may be consolidated at the discretion of the Commission or a reviewing court. See, e.g., FED. R. APP. P. 3(b). The ``no'' designation is used when applicants propose to serve different communities, but each certifies that it would
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-9A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-9A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-9A1.txt
  • permitting staff dismissal of defective application tentatively selected in a point hearing, and staff award of permit on a non-comparative basis to only remaining acceptable applicant). See generally NCE Omnibus, 22 FCC Rcd at 6162 n.230 (2007) (standards for staff evaluation of petitions). See 5 U.S.C. �� 702, 704, 706; 47 U.S.C. �� 309(d), 402(b), 405; 47 C.F.R. �� 1.106-08, 1.120, 73.7004. In cases that involve separate mutually exclusive groups but present common issues, the petitions or appeals may be filed jointly or may be consolidated at the discretion of the Commission or a reviewing court. See, e.g., FED. R. APP. P. 3(b). The ``no'' designation is used when applicants propose to serve different communities, but each certifies that it would
• http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/OGC/Orders/1998/fcc98056.pdf http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/OGC/Orders/1998/fcc98056.wp
  • Commission regulation and the document is in fact served by mail (see � 1.47(f)), and the filing period for a response is 10 days or less, an additional 3 days (excluding holidays) will be allowed to all parties in the proceeding for filing a response. This paragraph (� 1.4(h)) shall not apply to documents filed pursuant to � 1.89, � 1.120(d), � 1.315(b) or � 1.316. For purposes of this paragraph service by facsimile or by electronic means shall be deemed equivalent to hand delivery. 6. Section 1.46 is amended by revising paragraphs (b) and (c) to read as follows: � 1.46 Motions for extension of time. * * * * * (b) Motions for extension of time in which to
• http://transition.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/FCC-07-40A1.doc http://transition.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/FCC-07-40A1.pdf
  • finds a new or novel question; or (3) finds a substantial and material question of fact). The Commission or Administrative Law Judge would then resolve new and novel or substantial and material factual matters and, if necessary, conduct a new comparative point hearing. See 5 U.S.C. �� 702, 704, 706; 47 U.S.C. �� 309(d), 402(b), 405; 47 C.F.R. �� 1.106-08, 1.120, 73.7004. In cases that involve separate mutually exclusive groups but present common issues, the petitions or appeals may be filed jointly or may be consolidated at the discretion of the Commission or the court. See, e.g., FED. R. APP. P. 3(b). 47 C.F.R. � 73.3004. The ``no'' designation is used when applicants propose to serve different communities, but each certifies
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/16/releases/da981138.pdf http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/16/releases/da981138.txt http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/16/releases/da981138.wp
  • prime interest to Nextel, and, in Federal Communications Commission DA 98-1138 32 Id. at 9. 33 See 47 C.F.R. � 1.2105(c); see also Mercury PCS I, 12 FCC Rcd. 17970 (WTB, 1997) (Mercury) (winning bidder in PCS auction assessed fine for bid signaling strategies). Nextel Opposition at 10. 34 35 Id. 36 See para. 3, supra. 37 47 C.F.R. � 1.120(c). See CMRS Second Report and Order, 9 FCC Rcd. 2348, 2386-87 (1994) (anti-collusion rule adopted). 38 39 See Mercury, 12 FCC Rcd. at 17977 at n.31. 40 Id. at n.30. 41 Id. at n.32. 5 exchange, Nextel would yield certain A block licenses to competing bidders. IE cites Nextel's conduct in the 32 Reno EA as illustrative of its allegations.
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/commoperators/element6.doc
  • water D.None of the above 6A294 C An Edison storage battery should not be charged at less than the manufacturer's specified rate: A.In order that the capacity of the battery shall be maximum after charge B.The chemical reactions of the Edison-type cell C.A & B D.None of the above 6A295 D Your emergency battery has a specific gravity reading of 1.120. What should be done? A.Place the battery on charge at once B.Bring the electrolyte level to about 1/4 inch above the top of the plates C.The battery will be fully charged when the specific gravity reads 1.280 to 1.300 D.All of the above 6A296 A What care should be taken with selecting water to add to a storage cell? A.It
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Cable/Orders/2000/da002228.doc
  • refund amount that differs from the calculation prescribed in the Refund Order. Operator did not file a petition for reconsideration or an application for review of the Refund Order. Consequently, Operator is attempting to raise in its refund plan an issue that it failed to properly place before the Commission in accordance with the Commission's rules. See Sections 1.101 - 1.120 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.101 - 1.120. A refund plan is not a substitute for the reconsideration and review process and issues raised in refund plans will not be considered. See also, In the Matter of Marcus Cable Associates, L.P., 12 FCC Rcd 19526 (1997). Federal Communications Commission DA 00-2228 Federal Communications Commission DA 00-2228 a b
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Cable/Orders/2000/da002388.doc
  • cable programming service tier ("CPST") subscribers for the period stated in the Refund Order and file a report with the Chief, Cable Services Bureau, stating the cumulative refund amount determined (including franchise fees and interest), describing the calculation thereof, and describing its plan to implement the refund within 60 days of Commission approval of the plan. See Sections 1.101 - 1.120 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.101 - 1.120. See also, In the Matter of Marcus Cable Associates, L.P., 12 FCC Rcd 19526 (1997). See In the Matter of Cencom Cable Income Partners II, LP, 12 FCC Rcd 7948 (1997). 8 FCC Rcd 5631 (1993). Cencom at � 22 (footnote omitted). We calculated a principal amount of $3,145.70 for
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Intl/4361-98.pdf
  • 9.0 0.0 9,407,23425.7 0.618.717.038.1 Israel $175,485,42957.1 0.424.716.5 1.2 $51,101,33253.2 0.024.022.3 0.4 $2,877,38878.4 0.014.3 6.3 1.1 393,264,98149.0 1.222.524.5 2.8 Jordan $40,585,75448.7 1.523.2 9.217.5 $4,820,44945.6 0.036.115.1 3.1 $599,11341.3 0.022.423.812.5 58,412,78535.9 3.126.311.623.1 Kuwait $53,219,05461.8 0.617.818.1 1.7 $6,765,93025.3 0.037.936.2 0.6 $11,962,07791.7 0.0 4.6 3.6 0.1 59,485,65749.3 0.924.523.0 2.3 Lebanon $51,341,29746.0 3.111.7 7.431.7 $5,989,54729.8 0.047.8 0.022.4 $3,407,20560.3 0.036.4 0.0 3.4 68,918,36725.5 4.112.7 7.250.5 Oman $6,450,78955.5 1.120.415.1 7.9 $1,813,28569.4 0.019.010.7 0.9 $1,057,69775.7 0.012.511.9 0.0 7,791,56052.6 1.323.114.7 8.3 Qatar $6,492,02065.1 0.520.6 9.2 4.7 $3,341,50654.0 0.037.2 8.8 0.0 $2,793,50912.9 0.018.768.4 0.0 9,268,09058.8 0.625.5 9.2 5.8 Saudi Arabia $115,692,73267.2 0.612.3 9.010.8 $35,610,07229.1 0.048.920.4 1.7 $6,865,38678.7 0.019.5 1.8 0.0 156,537,94550.2 0.823.110.915.0 Syria $16,282,54052.1 2.924.3 6.314.4 $3,161,32633.8 0.023.428.114.7 $2,296,07175.1 0.010.5 3.411.1 20,353,01430.3 4.213.8 8.543.2 United Arab Emirates $50,402,82960.5 0.820.8 8.9 9.0 $26,781,98135.0
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/OGC/Orders/1998/fcc98056.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/OGC/Orders/1998/fcc98056.wp
  • Commission regulation and the document is in fact served by mail (see � 1.47(f)), and the filing period for a response is 10 days or less, an additional 3 days (excluding holidays) will be allowed to all parties in the proceeding for filing a response. This paragraph (� 1.4(h)) shall not apply to documents filed pursuant to � 1.89, � 1.120(d), � 1.315(b) or � 1.316. For purposes of this paragraph service by facsimile or by electronic means shall be deemed equivalent to hand delivery. 6. Section 1.46 is amended by revising paragraphs (b) and (c) to read as follows: � 1.46 Motions for extension of time. * * * * * (b) Motions for extension of time in which to
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-08-1467A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-08-1467A1.pdf
  • a petition for reconsideration requesting reinstatement nunc pro tunc within 30 days, provided that the amendment is minor and does not alter the fair distribution preference. See 47 C.F.R. � 73.3522(b)(1). A tentative selectee that is unable to cure the defect is disqualified. See 5 U.S.C. �� 702, 704, 706; 47 U.S.C. �� 309(d), 402(b), 405; 47 C.F.R. �� 1.106-08, 1.120, 73.7004. In cases that involve separate mutually exclusive groups but present common issues, the petitions or appeals may be filed jointly or may be consolidated at the discretion of the Commission or the court. See, e.g., FED. R. APP. P. 3(b). Federal Communications Commission DA 08-1467 Federal Communications Commission DA 08-1467 � tm � � � Y ] � �
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-09-2172A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-09-2172A1.pdf
  • tunc within 30 days. The amendment must be minor and may not alter the fair distribution preference. See 47 C.F.R. � 73.3522(b)(1). The staff will not reinstate the application of a tentative selectee that is unable to cure all defects. See 5 U.S.C. �� 702, 704, and 706; 47 U.S.C. �� 309(d), 402(b), and 405; 47 C.F.R. �� 1.106-08, 1.115, 1.120, and 73.7004. In cases that involve separate mutually exclusive groups but present common issues, the petitions or appeals may be filed jointly or may be consolidated at the discretion of the Commission or the court. See, e.g., FED. R. APP. P. 3(b). Federal Communications Commission DA 09-2172 Federal Communications Commission DA 09-2172 . / � � � � � �
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-09-2596A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-09-2596A1.pdf
  • tunc within 30 days. The amendment must be minor and may not alter the fair distribution preference. See 47 C.F.R. � 73.3522(b)(1). The staff will not reinstate the application of a tentative selectee that is unable to cure all defects. See 5 U.S.C. �� 702, 704, and 706; 47 U.S.C. �� 309(d), 402(b), and 405; 47 C.F.R. �� 1.106-08, 1.115, 1.120, and 73.7004. In cases that involve separate mutually exclusive groups but present common issues, the petitions or appeals may be filed jointly or may be consolidated at the discretion of the Commission or the court. See, e.g., FED. R. APP. P. 3(b). Federal Communications Commission DA 09-2596 Federal Communications Commission DA 09-2596 - � � � � � � (R)
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-09-735A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-09-735A1.pdf
  • tunc within 30 days. The amendment must be minor and may not alter the fair distribution preference. See 47 C.F.R. � 73.3522(b)(1). The staff will not reinstate the application of a tentative selectee that is unable to cure all defects. See 5 U.S.C. �� 702, 704, and 706; 47 U.S.C. �� 309(d), 402(b), and 405; 47 C.F.R. �� 1.106-08, 1.115, 1.120, and 73.7004. In cases that involve separate mutually exclusive groups but present common issues, the petitions or appeals may be filed jointly or may be consolidated at the discretion of the Commission or the court. See, e.g., FED. R. APP. P. 3(b). Federal Communications Commission DA 09-735 Federal Communications Commission DA 09-735 ... � � � � � � �
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/FCC-07-40A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/FCC-07-40A1.pdf
  • finds a new or novel question; or (3) finds a substantial and material question of fact). The Commission or Administrative Law Judge would then resolve new and novel or substantial and material factual matters and, if necessary, conduct a new comparative point hearing. See 5 U.S.C. �� 702, 704, 706; 47 U.S.C. �� 309(d), 402(b), 405; 47 C.F.R. �� 1.106-08, 1.120, 73.7004. In cases that involve separate mutually exclusive groups but present common issues, the petitions or appeals may be filed jointly or may be consolidated at the discretion of the Commission or the court. See, e.g., FED. R. APP. P. 3(b). 47 C.F.R. � 73.3004. The ``no'' designation is used when applicants propose to serve different communities, but each certifies
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1467A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1467A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1467A1.txt
  • a petition for reconsideration requesting reinstatement nunc pro tunc within 30 days, provided that the amendment is minor and does not alter the fair distribution preference. See 47 C.F.R. � 73.3522(b)(1). A tentative selectee that is unable to cure the defect is disqualified. See 5 U.S.C. �� 702, 704, 706; 47 U.S.C. �� 309(d), 402(b), 405; 47 C.F.R. �� 1.106-08, 1.120, 73.7004. In cases that involve separate mutually exclusive groups but present common issues, the petitions or appeals may be filed jointly or may be consolidated at the discretion of the Commission or the court. See, e.g., FED. R. APP. P. 3(b). Federal Communications Commission DA 08-1467 Federal Communications Commission DA 08-1467 � tm � � � Y ] � �
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1537A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1537A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1537A1.txt
  • a petition for reconsideration requesting reinstatement nunc pro tunc within 30 days, provided that the amendment is minor and does not alter the fair distribution preference. See 47 C.F.R. � 73.3522(b)(1). A tentative selectee that is unable to cure the defect is disqualified. See 5 U.S.C. �� 702, 704, 706; 47 U.S.C. �� 309(d), 402(b), 405; 47 C.F.R. �� 1.106-08, 1.120, 73.7004. In cases that involve separate mutually exclusive groups but present common issues, the petitions or appeals may be filed jointly or may be consolidated at the discretion of the Commission or the court. See, e.g., FED. R. APP. P. 3(b). Federal Communications Commission DA 08-1537 Federal Communications Commission DA 08-1537 0 1 � � � � � � �
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1949A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1949A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1949A1.txt
  • a petition for reconsideration requesting reinstatement nunc pro tunc within 30 days, provided that the amendment is minor and does not alter the fair distribution preference. See 47 C.F.R. � 73.3522(b)(1). A tentative selectee that is unable to cure the defect is disqualified. See 5 U.S.C. �� 702, 704, 706; 47 U.S.C. �� 309(d), 402(b), 405; 47 C.F.R. �� 1.106-08, 1.120, 73.7004. In cases that involve separate mutually exclusive groups but present common issues, the petitions or appeals may be filed jointly or may be consolidated at the discretion of the Commission or the court. See, e.g., FED. R. APP. P. 3(b). Federal Communications Commission DA 08-1949 Federal Communications Commission DA 08-1949 S T � � _H _H � K l
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2717A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2717A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2717A1.txt
  • a petition for reconsideration requesting reinstatement nunc pro tunc within 30 days, provided that the amendment is minor and does not alter the fair distribution preference. See 47 C.F.R. � 73.3522(b)(1). A tentative selectee that is unable to cure the defect is disqualified. See 5 U.S.C. �� 702, 704, 706; 47 U.S.C. �� 309(d), 402(b), 405; 47 C.F.R. �� 1.106-08, 1.120, 73.7004. In cases that involve separate mutually exclusive groups but present common issues, the petitions or appeals may be filed jointly or may be consolidated at the discretion of the Commission or the court. See, e.g., FED. R. APP. P. 3(b). Federal Communications Commission DA 08-2717 Federal Communications Commission DA 08-2717 # $ � � � 6 Q } �
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2172A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2172A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2172A1.txt
  • tunc within 30 days. The amendment must be minor and may not alter the fair distribution preference. See 47 C.F.R. � 73.3522(b)(1). The staff will not reinstate the application of a tentative selectee that is unable to cure all defects. See 5 U.S.C. �� 702, 704, and 706; 47 U.S.C. �� 309(d), 402(b), and 405; 47 C.F.R. �� 1.106-08, 1.115, 1.120, and 73.7004. In cases that involve separate mutually exclusive groups but present common issues, the petitions or appeals may be filed jointly or may be consolidated at the discretion of the Commission or the court. See, e.g., FED. R. APP. P. 3(b). Federal Communications Commission DA 09-2172 Federal Communications Commission DA 09-2172 . / � � � � � �
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2381A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2381A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2381A1.txt
  • tunc within 30 days. The amendment must be minor and may not alter the fair distribution preference. See 47 C.F.R. � 73.3522(b)(1). The staff will not reinstate the application of a tentative selectee that is unable to cure all defects. See 5 U.S.C. �� 702, 704, and 706; 47 U.S.C. �� 309(d), 402(b), and 405; 47 C.F.R. �� 1.106-08, 1.115, 1.120, and 73.7004. In cases that involve separate mutually exclusive groups but present common issues, the petitions or appeals may be filed jointly or may be consolidated at the discretion of the Commission or the court. See, e.g., FED. R. APP. P. 3(b). Federal Communications Commission DA 09-2381 Federal Communications Commission DA 09-2381 � � � � � � 0 0
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2596A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2596A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2596A1.txt
  • tunc within 30 days. The amendment must be minor and may not alter the fair distribution preference. See 47 C.F.R. � 73.3522(b)(1). The staff will not reinstate the application of a tentative selectee that is unable to cure all defects. See 5 U.S.C. �� 702, 704, and 706; 47 U.S.C. �� 309(d), 402(b), and 405; 47 C.F.R. �� 1.106-08, 1.115, 1.120, and 73.7004. In cases that involve separate mutually exclusive groups but present common issues, the petitions or appeals may be filed jointly or may be consolidated at the discretion of the Commission or the court. See, e.g., FED. R. APP. P. 3(b). Federal Communications Commission DA 09-2596 Federal Communications Commission DA 09-2596 - � � � � � � (R)
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-53A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-53A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-53A1.txt
  • Cable programming service 78 45.4 1.308 67 47.5 1.310 Expanded basic service 78 72.3 1.002 67 73.3 1.240 Wireless MVPD subgroup Basic cable service 33 23.7 0.947 32 23.3 0.788 Cable programming service 33 50.2 0.975 32 50.3 0.969 Expanded basic service 33 73.9 0.787 32 73.6 0.620 Low penetration test subgroup Basic cable service 68 23.1 1.104 66 23.0 1.120 Cable programming service 68 47.8 1.186 66 47.8 1.229 Expanded basic service 68 70.8 0.919 66 70.8 0.910 Source: 2007/2008 cable price survey. Attachment 10 Other Programming Channels January 1, 2006 Sample Group Local Broadcast Stations in HD Format (1) Most Highly Subscribed Digital Tier (2) N Mean S.E. N Mean S.E. Sample groups overall 754 4.3 0.08 725 40.6
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-735A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-735A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-735A1.txt
  • tunc within 30 days. The amendment must be minor and may not alter the fair distribution preference. See 47 C.F.R. � 73.3522(b)(1). The staff will not reinstate the application of a tentative selectee that is unable to cure all defects. See 5 U.S.C. �� 702, 704, and 706; 47 U.S.C. �� 309(d), 402(b), and 405; 47 C.F.R. �� 1.106-08, 1.115, 1.120, and 73.7004. In cases that involve separate mutually exclusive groups but present common issues, the petitions or appeals may be filed jointly or may be consolidated at the discretion of the Commission or the court. See, e.g., FED. R. APP. P. 3(b). Federal Communications Commission DA 09-735 Federal Communications Commission DA 09-735 ... � � � � � � �
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2072A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2072A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2072A1.txt
  • C.F.R. � 73.3522(b)(1). The staff will not reinstate the application of a tentative selectee that is unable to cure all defects. See id. � 1.106 (a) (1). See also Patrick J. Vaughn, Esq., Letter, 22 FCC Rcd 11165 (MB 2007). See 5 U.S.C. �� 702, 704, and 706; 47 U.S.C. �� 309(d), 402(b), and 405; 47 C.F.R. �� 1.106-08, 1.115, 1.120, and 73.7004. In cases that involve separate mutually exclusive groups but present common issues, the petitions or appeals may be filed jointly or may be consolidated at the discretion of the Commission or the court. See, e.g., FED. R. APP. P. 3(b). Federal Communications Commission DA 10-2072 Federal Communications Commission DA 10-2072 ` a � � � � � 0
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1658A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1658A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1658A1.txt
  • amends the following rules in Part 1, Subpart A, General Rules of Practice and Procedure, to delete an obsolete rule and obsolete references, as follows: Section 1.115(b)(2), which pertains to applications for review of actions taken pursuant to delegated authority, is amended to delete ``Except as provided in paragraph (b)(5) of this section'' because paragraph (b)(5) has been deleted. Section 1.120, which describes the Commission's former ``protest'' process, is deleted because, by its express terms, it does not apply to applications filed on or after December 12, 1960. As a result, this section is without current legal effect and is obsolete. In addition, this Order deletes references to section 1.120 from other rules. Specifically, in section 1.4(h), the reference to section
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-310874A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-310874A1.txt
  • Fund) and the TRS Fund administrator's performance after two years (i.e. in 1995). Removed note that certain provisions of the rule are not effective until OMB approval. OMB approval received August 2000. 64.604(c)(5)(iii)(J) 64.2401, removed [Note] 10/13/11 Describes the Commission's former "protest" process. By its express terms, it does not apply to applications filed on or after December 12, 1960. 1.120 Adopted 9/30/11 pending FR publication These sections pertain to comparative hearings for broadcast license renewal applications. The enactment of section 309(k) of the Communications Act of 1934 eliminated comparative broadcast hearings for license renewal applicants. 1.227 (b)(6) 1.229(b)(2) Adopted 9/30/11 pending FR publication Pertains to comparative hearings involving applicants for new commercial broadcast facilities and calls for the production of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-40A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-40A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-40A1.txt
  • finds a new or novel question; or (3) finds a substantial and material question of fact). The Commission or Administrative Law Judge would then resolve new and novel or substantial and material factual matters and, if necessary, conduct a new comparative point hearing. See 5 U.S.C. �� 702, 704, 706; 47 U.S.C. �� 309(d), 402(b), 405; 47 C.F.R. �� 1.106-08, 1.120, 73.7004. In cases that involve separate mutually exclusive groups but present common issues, the petitions or appeals may be filed jointly or may be consolidated at the discretion of the Commission or the court. See, e.g., FED. R. APP. P. 3(b). 47 C.F.R. � 73.3004. The ``no'' designation is used when applicants propose to serve different communities, but each certifies
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-29A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-29A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-29A1.txt
  • selected application following point hearing, and award of permit on a non-comparative basis to only remaining acceptable applicant). See generally NCE Omnibus, 22 FCC Rcd at 6162 n.230 (2007) (standards for staff evaluation of petitions). See NCE MO&O, 16 FCC Rcd at 5104-05. See 5 U.S.C. �� 702, 704, 706; 47 U.S.C. �� 309(d), 402(b), 405; 47 C.F.R. �� 1.106-08, 1.120, 73.7004. In cases that involve separate mutually exclusive groups but present common issues, the petitions or appeals may be filed jointly or may be consolidated at the discretion of the Commission or the court. See, e.g., FED. R. APP. P. 3(b). The ``no'' designation is used when applicants propose to serve different communities, but each certifies that it would not
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-69A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-69A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-69A1.txt
  • (permitting staff dismissal of defective application tentatively selected in a point hearing, and staff award of permit on a non-comparative basis to only remaining acceptable applicant). See generally NCE Omnibus, 22 FCC Rcd at 6162 n.230 (2007) (standards for staff evaluation of petitions). See 5 U.S.C. �� 702, 704, 706; 47 U.S.C. �� 309(d), 402(b), 405; 47 C.F.R. �� 1.106-08, 1.120, 73.7004. In cases that involve separate mutually exclusive groups but present common issues, the petitions or appeals may be filed jointly or may be consolidated at the discretion of the Commission or a reviewing court. See, e.g., FED. R. APP. P. 3(b). The ``no'' designation is used when applicants propose to serve different communities, but each certifies that it would
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-9A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-9A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-9A1.txt
  • permitting staff dismissal of defective application tentatively selected in a point hearing, and staff award of permit on a non-comparative basis to only remaining acceptable applicant). See generally NCE Omnibus, 22 FCC Rcd at 6162 n.230 (2007) (standards for staff evaluation of petitions). See 5 U.S.C. �� 702, 704, 706; 47 U.S.C. �� 309(d), 402(b), 405; 47 C.F.R. �� 1.106-08, 1.120, 73.7004. In cases that involve separate mutually exclusive groups but present common issues, the petitions or appeals may be filed jointly or may be consolidated at the discretion of the Commission or a reviewing court. See, e.g., FED. R. APP. P. 3(b). The ``no'' designation is used when applicants propose to serve different communities, but each certifies that it would
• http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/OGC/Orders/1998/fcc98056.pdf http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/OGC/Orders/1998/fcc98056.wp
  • Commission regulation and the document is in fact served by mail (see � 1.47(f)), and the filing period for a response is 10 days or less, an additional 3 days (excluding holidays) will be allowed to all parties in the proceeding for filing a response. This paragraph (� 1.4(h)) shall not apply to documents filed pursuant to � 1.89, � 1.120(d), � 1.315(b) or � 1.316. For purposes of this paragraph service by facsimile or by electronic means shall be deemed equivalent to hand delivery. 6. Section 1.46 is amended by revising paragraphs (b) and (c) to read as follows: � 1.46 Motions for extension of time. * * * * * (b) Motions for extension of time in which to
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/16/releases/da981138.pdf http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/16/releases/da981138.txt http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/16/releases/da981138.wp
  • prime interest to Nextel, and, in Federal Communications Commission DA 98-1138 32 Id. at 9. 33 See 47 C.F.R. � 1.2105(c); see also Mercury PCS I, 12 FCC Rcd. 17970 (WTB, 1997) (Mercury) (winning bidder in PCS auction assessed fine for bid signaling strategies). Nextel Opposition at 10. 34 35 Id. 36 See para. 3, supra. 37 47 C.F.R. � 1.120(c). See CMRS Second Report and Order, 9 FCC Rcd. 2348, 2386-87 (1994) (anti-collusion rule adopted). 38 39 See Mercury, 12 FCC Rcd. at 17977 at n.31. 40 Id. at n.30. 41 Id. at n.32. 5 exchange, Nextel would yield certain A block licenses to competing bidders. IE cites Nextel's conduct in the 32 Reno EA as illustrative of its allegations.
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/commoperators/element6.doc
  • water D.None of the above 6A294 C An Edison storage battery should not be charged at less than the manufacturer's specified rate: A.In order that the capacity of the battery shall be maximum after charge B.The chemical reactions of the Edison-type cell C.A & B D.None of the above 6A295 D Your emergency battery has a specific gravity reading of 1.120. What should be done? A.Place the battery on charge at once B.Bring the electrolyte level to about 1/4 inch above the top of the plates C.The battery will be fully charged when the specific gravity reads 1.280 to 1.300 D.All of the above 6A296 A What care should be taken with selecting water to add to a storage cell? A.It
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Cable/Orders/2000/da002228.doc
  • refund amount that differs from the calculation prescribed in the Refund Order. Operator did not file a petition for reconsideration or an application for review of the Refund Order. Consequently, Operator is attempting to raise in its refund plan an issue that it failed to properly place before the Commission in accordance with the Commission's rules. See Sections 1.101 - 1.120 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.101 - 1.120. A refund plan is not a substitute for the reconsideration and review process and issues raised in refund plans will not be considered. See also, In the Matter of Marcus Cable Associates, L.P., 12 FCC Rcd 19526 (1997). Federal Communications Commission DA 00-2228 Federal Communications Commission DA 00-2228 a b
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Cable/Orders/2000/da002388.doc
  • cable programming service tier ("CPST") subscribers for the period stated in the Refund Order and file a report with the Chief, Cable Services Bureau, stating the cumulative refund amount determined (including franchise fees and interest), describing the calculation thereof, and describing its plan to implement the refund within 60 days of Commission approval of the plan. See Sections 1.101 - 1.120 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.101 - 1.120. See also, In the Matter of Marcus Cable Associates, L.P., 12 FCC Rcd 19526 (1997). See In the Matter of Cencom Cable Income Partners II, LP, 12 FCC Rcd 7948 (1997). 8 FCC Rcd 5631 (1993). Cencom at � 22 (footnote omitted). We calculated a principal amount of $3,145.70 for
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Intl/4361-98.pdf
  • 9.0 0.0 9,407,23425.7 0.618.717.038.1 Israel $175,485,42957.1 0.424.716.5 1.2 $51,101,33253.2 0.024.022.3 0.4 $2,877,38878.4 0.014.3 6.3 1.1 393,264,98149.0 1.222.524.5 2.8 Jordan $40,585,75448.7 1.523.2 9.217.5 $4,820,44945.6 0.036.115.1 3.1 $599,11341.3 0.022.423.812.5 58,412,78535.9 3.126.311.623.1 Kuwait $53,219,05461.8 0.617.818.1 1.7 $6,765,93025.3 0.037.936.2 0.6 $11,962,07791.7 0.0 4.6 3.6 0.1 59,485,65749.3 0.924.523.0 2.3 Lebanon $51,341,29746.0 3.111.7 7.431.7 $5,989,54729.8 0.047.8 0.022.4 $3,407,20560.3 0.036.4 0.0 3.4 68,918,36725.5 4.112.7 7.250.5 Oman $6,450,78955.5 1.120.415.1 7.9 $1,813,28569.4 0.019.010.7 0.9 $1,057,69775.7 0.012.511.9 0.0 7,791,56052.6 1.323.114.7 8.3 Qatar $6,492,02065.1 0.520.6 9.2 4.7 $3,341,50654.0 0.037.2 8.8 0.0 $2,793,50912.9 0.018.768.4 0.0 9,268,09058.8 0.625.5 9.2 5.8 Saudi Arabia $115,692,73267.2 0.612.3 9.010.8 $35,610,07229.1 0.048.920.4 1.7 $6,865,38678.7 0.019.5 1.8 0.0 156,537,94550.2 0.823.110.915.0 Syria $16,282,54052.1 2.924.3 6.314.4 $3,161,32633.8 0.023.428.114.7 $2,296,07175.1 0.010.5 3.411.1 20,353,01430.3 4.213.8 8.543.2 United Arab Emirates $50,402,82960.5 0.820.8 8.9 9.0 $26,781,98135.0
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/OGC/Orders/1998/fcc98056.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/OGC/Orders/1998/fcc98056.wp
  • Commission regulation and the document is in fact served by mail (see � 1.47(f)), and the filing period for a response is 10 days or less, an additional 3 days (excluding holidays) will be allowed to all parties in the proceeding for filing a response. This paragraph (� 1.4(h)) shall not apply to documents filed pursuant to � 1.89, � 1.120(d), � 1.315(b) or � 1.316. For purposes of this paragraph service by facsimile or by electronic means shall be deemed equivalent to hand delivery. 6. Section 1.46 is amended by revising paragraphs (b) and (c) to read as follows: � 1.46 Motions for extension of time. * * * * * (b) Motions for extension of time in which to
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-08-1467A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-08-1467A1.pdf
  • a petition for reconsideration requesting reinstatement nunc pro tunc within 30 days, provided that the amendment is minor and does not alter the fair distribution preference. See 47 C.F.R. � 73.3522(b)(1). A tentative selectee that is unable to cure the defect is disqualified. See 5 U.S.C. �� 702, 704, 706; 47 U.S.C. �� 309(d), 402(b), 405; 47 C.F.R. �� 1.106-08, 1.120, 73.7004. In cases that involve separate mutually exclusive groups but present common issues, the petitions or appeals may be filed jointly or may be consolidated at the discretion of the Commission or the court. See, e.g., FED. R. APP. P. 3(b). Federal Communications Commission DA 08-1467 Federal Communications Commission DA 08-1467 � tm � � � Y ] � �
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-09-2172A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-09-2172A1.pdf
  • tunc within 30 days. The amendment must be minor and may not alter the fair distribution preference. See 47 C.F.R. � 73.3522(b)(1). The staff will not reinstate the application of a tentative selectee that is unable to cure all defects. See 5 U.S.C. �� 702, 704, and 706; 47 U.S.C. �� 309(d), 402(b), and 405; 47 C.F.R. �� 1.106-08, 1.115, 1.120, and 73.7004. In cases that involve separate mutually exclusive groups but present common issues, the petitions or appeals may be filed jointly or may be consolidated at the discretion of the Commission or the court. See, e.g., FED. R. APP. P. 3(b). Federal Communications Commission DA 09-2172 Federal Communications Commission DA 09-2172 . / � � � � � �
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-09-2596A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-09-2596A1.pdf
  • tunc within 30 days. The amendment must be minor and may not alter the fair distribution preference. See 47 C.F.R. � 73.3522(b)(1). The staff will not reinstate the application of a tentative selectee that is unable to cure all defects. See 5 U.S.C. �� 702, 704, and 706; 47 U.S.C. �� 309(d), 402(b), and 405; 47 C.F.R. �� 1.106-08, 1.115, 1.120, and 73.7004. In cases that involve separate mutually exclusive groups but present common issues, the petitions or appeals may be filed jointly or may be consolidated at the discretion of the Commission or the court. See, e.g., FED. R. APP. P. 3(b). Federal Communications Commission DA 09-2596 Federal Communications Commission DA 09-2596 - � � � � � � (R)
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-09-735A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-09-735A1.pdf
  • tunc within 30 days. The amendment must be minor and may not alter the fair distribution preference. See 47 C.F.R. � 73.3522(b)(1). The staff will not reinstate the application of a tentative selectee that is unable to cure all defects. See 5 U.S.C. �� 702, 704, and 706; 47 U.S.C. �� 309(d), 402(b), and 405; 47 C.F.R. �� 1.106-08, 1.115, 1.120, and 73.7004. In cases that involve separate mutually exclusive groups but present common issues, the petitions or appeals may be filed jointly or may be consolidated at the discretion of the Commission or the court. See, e.g., FED. R. APP. P. 3(b). Federal Communications Commission DA 09-735 Federal Communications Commission DA 09-735 ... � � � � � � �
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/FCC-07-40A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/FCC-07-40A1.pdf
  • finds a new or novel question; or (3) finds a substantial and material question of fact). The Commission or Administrative Law Judge would then resolve new and novel or substantial and material factual matters and, if necessary, conduct a new comparative point hearing. See 5 U.S.C. �� 702, 704, 706; 47 U.S.C. �� 309(d), 402(b), 405; 47 C.F.R. �� 1.106-08, 1.120, 73.7004. In cases that involve separate mutually exclusive groups but present common issues, the petitions or appeals may be filed jointly or may be consolidated at the discretion of the Commission or the court. See, e.g., FED. R. APP. P. 3(b). 47 C.F.R. � 73.3004. The ``no'' designation is used when applicants propose to serve different communities, but each certifies
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1467A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1467A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1467A1.txt
  • a petition for reconsideration requesting reinstatement nunc pro tunc within 30 days, provided that the amendment is minor and does not alter the fair distribution preference. See 47 C.F.R. � 73.3522(b)(1). A tentative selectee that is unable to cure the defect is disqualified. See 5 U.S.C. �� 702, 704, 706; 47 U.S.C. �� 309(d), 402(b), 405; 47 C.F.R. �� 1.106-08, 1.120, 73.7004. In cases that involve separate mutually exclusive groups but present common issues, the petitions or appeals may be filed jointly or may be consolidated at the discretion of the Commission or the court. See, e.g., FED. R. APP. P. 3(b). Federal Communications Commission DA 08-1467 Federal Communications Commission DA 08-1467 � tm � � � Y ] � �
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1537A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1537A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1537A1.txt
  • a petition for reconsideration requesting reinstatement nunc pro tunc within 30 days, provided that the amendment is minor and does not alter the fair distribution preference. See 47 C.F.R. � 73.3522(b)(1). A tentative selectee that is unable to cure the defect is disqualified. See 5 U.S.C. �� 702, 704, 706; 47 U.S.C. �� 309(d), 402(b), 405; 47 C.F.R. �� 1.106-08, 1.120, 73.7004. In cases that involve separate mutually exclusive groups but present common issues, the petitions or appeals may be filed jointly or may be consolidated at the discretion of the Commission or the court. See, e.g., FED. R. APP. P. 3(b). Federal Communications Commission DA 08-1537 Federal Communications Commission DA 08-1537 0 1 � � � � � � �
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1949A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1949A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1949A1.txt
  • a petition for reconsideration requesting reinstatement nunc pro tunc within 30 days, provided that the amendment is minor and does not alter the fair distribution preference. See 47 C.F.R. � 73.3522(b)(1). A tentative selectee that is unable to cure the defect is disqualified. See 5 U.S.C. �� 702, 704, 706; 47 U.S.C. �� 309(d), 402(b), 405; 47 C.F.R. �� 1.106-08, 1.120, 73.7004. In cases that involve separate mutually exclusive groups but present common issues, the petitions or appeals may be filed jointly or may be consolidated at the discretion of the Commission or the court. See, e.g., FED. R. APP. P. 3(b). Federal Communications Commission DA 08-1949 Federal Communications Commission DA 08-1949 S T � � _H _H � K l
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2717A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2717A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2717A1.txt
  • a petition for reconsideration requesting reinstatement nunc pro tunc within 30 days, provided that the amendment is minor and does not alter the fair distribution preference. See 47 C.F.R. � 73.3522(b)(1). A tentative selectee that is unable to cure the defect is disqualified. See 5 U.S.C. �� 702, 704, 706; 47 U.S.C. �� 309(d), 402(b), 405; 47 C.F.R. �� 1.106-08, 1.120, 73.7004. In cases that involve separate mutually exclusive groups but present common issues, the petitions or appeals may be filed jointly or may be consolidated at the discretion of the Commission or the court. See, e.g., FED. R. APP. P. 3(b). Federal Communications Commission DA 08-2717 Federal Communications Commission DA 08-2717 # $ � � � 6 Q } �
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2172A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2172A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2172A1.txt
  • tunc within 30 days. The amendment must be minor and may not alter the fair distribution preference. See 47 C.F.R. � 73.3522(b)(1). The staff will not reinstate the application of a tentative selectee that is unable to cure all defects. See 5 U.S.C. �� 702, 704, and 706; 47 U.S.C. �� 309(d), 402(b), and 405; 47 C.F.R. �� 1.106-08, 1.115, 1.120, and 73.7004. In cases that involve separate mutually exclusive groups but present common issues, the petitions or appeals may be filed jointly or may be consolidated at the discretion of the Commission or the court. See, e.g., FED. R. APP. P. 3(b). Federal Communications Commission DA 09-2172 Federal Communications Commission DA 09-2172 . / � � � � � �
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2381A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2381A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2381A1.txt
  • tunc within 30 days. The amendment must be minor and may not alter the fair distribution preference. See 47 C.F.R. � 73.3522(b)(1). The staff will not reinstate the application of a tentative selectee that is unable to cure all defects. See 5 U.S.C. �� 702, 704, and 706; 47 U.S.C. �� 309(d), 402(b), and 405; 47 C.F.R. �� 1.106-08, 1.115, 1.120, and 73.7004. In cases that involve separate mutually exclusive groups but present common issues, the petitions or appeals may be filed jointly or may be consolidated at the discretion of the Commission or the court. See, e.g., FED. R. APP. P. 3(b). Federal Communications Commission DA 09-2381 Federal Communications Commission DA 09-2381 � � � � � � 0 0
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2596A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2596A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2596A1.txt
  • tunc within 30 days. The amendment must be minor and may not alter the fair distribution preference. See 47 C.F.R. � 73.3522(b)(1). The staff will not reinstate the application of a tentative selectee that is unable to cure all defects. See 5 U.S.C. �� 702, 704, and 706; 47 U.S.C. �� 309(d), 402(b), and 405; 47 C.F.R. �� 1.106-08, 1.115, 1.120, and 73.7004. In cases that involve separate mutually exclusive groups but present common issues, the petitions or appeals may be filed jointly or may be consolidated at the discretion of the Commission or the court. See, e.g., FED. R. APP. P. 3(b). Federal Communications Commission DA 09-2596 Federal Communications Commission DA 09-2596 - � � � � � � (R)
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-53A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-53A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-53A1.txt
  • Cable programming service 78 45.4 1.308 67 47.5 1.310 Expanded basic service 78 72.3 1.002 67 73.3 1.240 Wireless MVPD subgroup Basic cable service 33 23.7 0.947 32 23.3 0.788 Cable programming service 33 50.2 0.975 32 50.3 0.969 Expanded basic service 33 73.9 0.787 32 73.6 0.620 Low penetration test subgroup Basic cable service 68 23.1 1.104 66 23.0 1.120 Cable programming service 68 47.8 1.186 66 47.8 1.229 Expanded basic service 68 70.8 0.919 66 70.8 0.910 Source: 2007/2008 cable price survey. Attachment 10 Other Programming Channels January 1, 2006 Sample Group Local Broadcast Stations in HD Format (1) Most Highly Subscribed Digital Tier (2) N Mean S.E. N Mean S.E. Sample groups overall 754 4.3 0.08 725 40.6
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-735A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-735A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-735A1.txt
  • tunc within 30 days. The amendment must be minor and may not alter the fair distribution preference. See 47 C.F.R. � 73.3522(b)(1). The staff will not reinstate the application of a tentative selectee that is unable to cure all defects. See 5 U.S.C. �� 702, 704, and 706; 47 U.S.C. �� 309(d), 402(b), and 405; 47 C.F.R. �� 1.106-08, 1.115, 1.120, and 73.7004. In cases that involve separate mutually exclusive groups but present common issues, the petitions or appeals may be filed jointly or may be consolidated at the discretion of the Commission or the court. See, e.g., FED. R. APP. P. 3(b). Federal Communications Commission DA 09-735 Federal Communications Commission DA 09-735 ... � � � � � � �
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2072A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2072A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2072A1.txt
  • C.F.R. � 73.3522(b)(1). The staff will not reinstate the application of a tentative selectee that is unable to cure all defects. See id. � 1.106 (a) (1). See also Patrick J. Vaughn, Esq., Letter, 22 FCC Rcd 11165 (MB 2007). See 5 U.S.C. �� 702, 704, and 706; 47 U.S.C. �� 309(d), 402(b), and 405; 47 C.F.R. �� 1.106-08, 1.115, 1.120, and 73.7004. In cases that involve separate mutually exclusive groups but present common issues, the petitions or appeals may be filed jointly or may be consolidated at the discretion of the Commission or the court. See, e.g., FED. R. APP. P. 3(b). Federal Communications Commission DA 10-2072 Federal Communications Commission DA 10-2072 ` a � � � � � 0
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1658A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1658A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1658A1.txt
  • amends the following rules in Part 1, Subpart A, General Rules of Practice and Procedure, to delete an obsolete rule and obsolete references, as follows: Section 1.115(b)(2), which pertains to applications for review of actions taken pursuant to delegated authority, is amended to delete ``Except as provided in paragraph (b)(5) of this section'' because paragraph (b)(5) has been deleted. Section 1.120, which describes the Commission's former ``protest'' process, is deleted because, by its express terms, it does not apply to applications filed on or after December 12, 1960. As a result, this section is without current legal effect and is obsolete. In addition, this Order deletes references to section 1.120 from other rules. Specifically, in section 1.4(h), the reference to section
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-310874A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-310874A1.txt
  • Fund) and the TRS Fund administrator's performance after two years (i.e. in 1995). Removed note that certain provisions of the rule are not effective until OMB approval. OMB approval received August 2000. 64.604(c)(5)(iii)(J) 64.2401, removed [Note] 10/13/11 Describes the Commission's former "protest" process. By its express terms, it does not apply to applications filed on or after December 12, 1960. 1.120 Adopted 9/30/11 pending FR publication These sections pertain to comparative hearings for broadcast license renewal applications. The enactment of section 309(k) of the Communications Act of 1934 eliminated comparative broadcast hearings for license renewal applicants. 1.227 (b)(6) 1.229(b)(2) Adopted 9/30/11 pending FR publication Pertains to comparative hearings involving applicants for new commercial broadcast facilities and calls for the production of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-40A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-40A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-40A1.txt
  • finds a new or novel question; or (3) finds a substantial and material question of fact). The Commission or Administrative Law Judge would then resolve new and novel or substantial and material factual matters and, if necessary, conduct a new comparative point hearing. See 5 U.S.C. �� 702, 704, 706; 47 U.S.C. �� 309(d), 402(b), 405; 47 C.F.R. �� 1.106-08, 1.120, 73.7004. In cases that involve separate mutually exclusive groups but present common issues, the petitions or appeals may be filed jointly or may be consolidated at the discretion of the Commission or the court. See, e.g., FED. R. APP. P. 3(b). 47 C.F.R. � 73.3004. The ``no'' designation is used when applicants propose to serve different communities, but each certifies
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-29A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-29A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-29A1.txt
  • selected application following point hearing, and award of permit on a non-comparative basis to only remaining acceptable applicant). See generally NCE Omnibus, 22 FCC Rcd at 6162 n.230 (2007) (standards for staff evaluation of petitions). See NCE MO&O, 16 FCC Rcd at 5104-05. See 5 U.S.C. �� 702, 704, 706; 47 U.S.C. �� 309(d), 402(b), 405; 47 C.F.R. �� 1.106-08, 1.120, 73.7004. In cases that involve separate mutually exclusive groups but present common issues, the petitions or appeals may be filed jointly or may be consolidated at the discretion of the Commission or the court. See, e.g., FED. R. APP. P. 3(b). The ``no'' designation is used when applicants propose to serve different communities, but each certifies that it would not
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-69A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-69A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-69A1.txt
  • (permitting staff dismissal of defective application tentatively selected in a point hearing, and staff award of permit on a non-comparative basis to only remaining acceptable applicant). See generally NCE Omnibus, 22 FCC Rcd at 6162 n.230 (2007) (standards for staff evaluation of petitions). See 5 U.S.C. �� 702, 704, 706; 47 U.S.C. �� 309(d), 402(b), 405; 47 C.F.R. �� 1.106-08, 1.120, 73.7004. In cases that involve separate mutually exclusive groups but present common issues, the petitions or appeals may be filed jointly or may be consolidated at the discretion of the Commission or a reviewing court. See, e.g., FED. R. APP. P. 3(b). The ``no'' designation is used when applicants propose to serve different communities, but each certifies that it would
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-9A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-9A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-9A1.txt
  • permitting staff dismissal of defective application tentatively selected in a point hearing, and staff award of permit on a non-comparative basis to only remaining acceptable applicant). See generally NCE Omnibus, 22 FCC Rcd at 6162 n.230 (2007) (standards for staff evaluation of petitions). See 5 U.S.C. �� 702, 704, 706; 47 U.S.C. �� 309(d), 402(b), 405; 47 C.F.R. �� 1.106-08, 1.120, 73.7004. In cases that involve separate mutually exclusive groups but present common issues, the petitions or appeals may be filed jointly or may be consolidated at the discretion of the Commission or a reviewing court. See, e.g., FED. R. APP. P. 3(b). The ``no'' designation is used when applicants propose to serve different communities, but each certifies that it would
• http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/OGC/Orders/1998/fcc98056.pdf http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/OGC/Orders/1998/fcc98056.wp
  • Commission regulation and the document is in fact served by mail (see � 1.47(f)), and the filing period for a response is 10 days or less, an additional 3 days (excluding holidays) will be allowed to all parties in the proceeding for filing a response. This paragraph (� 1.4(h)) shall not apply to documents filed pursuant to � 1.89, � 1.120(d), � 1.315(b) or � 1.316. For purposes of this paragraph service by facsimile or by electronic means shall be deemed equivalent to hand delivery. 6. Section 1.46 is amended by revising paragraphs (b) and (c) to read as follows: � 1.46 Motions for extension of time. * * * * * (b) Motions for extension of time in which to
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/16/releases/da981138.pdf http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/16/releases/da981138.txt http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/16/releases/da981138.wp
  • prime interest to Nextel, and, in Federal Communications Commission DA 98-1138 32 Id. at 9. 33 See 47 C.F.R. � 1.2105(c); see also Mercury PCS I, 12 FCC Rcd. 17970 (WTB, 1997) (Mercury) (winning bidder in PCS auction assessed fine for bid signaling strategies). Nextel Opposition at 10. 34 35 Id. 36 See para. 3, supra. 37 47 C.F.R. � 1.120(c). See CMRS Second Report and Order, 9 FCC Rcd. 2348, 2386-87 (1994) (anti-collusion rule adopted). 38 39 See Mercury, 12 FCC Rcd. at 17977 at n.31. 40 Id. at n.30. 41 Id. at n.32. 5 exchange, Nextel would yield certain A block licenses to competing bidders. IE cites Nextel's conduct in the 32 Reno EA as illustrative of its allegations.
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/commoperators/element6.doc
  • water D.None of the above 6A294 C An Edison storage battery should not be charged at less than the manufacturer's specified rate: A.In order that the capacity of the battery shall be maximum after charge B.The chemical reactions of the Edison-type cell C.A & B D.None of the above 6A295 D Your emergency battery has a specific gravity reading of 1.120. What should be done? A.Place the battery on charge at once B.Bring the electrolyte level to about 1/4 inch above the top of the plates C.The battery will be fully charged when the specific gravity reads 1.280 to 1.300 D.All of the above 6A296 A What care should be taken with selecting water to add to a storage cell? A.It
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Cable/Orders/2000/da002228.doc
  • refund amount that differs from the calculation prescribed in the Refund Order. Operator did not file a petition for reconsideration or an application for review of the Refund Order. Consequently, Operator is attempting to raise in its refund plan an issue that it failed to properly place before the Commission in accordance with the Commission's rules. See Sections 1.101 - 1.120 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.101 - 1.120. A refund plan is not a substitute for the reconsideration and review process and issues raised in refund plans will not be considered. See also, In the Matter of Marcus Cable Associates, L.P., 12 FCC Rcd 19526 (1997). Federal Communications Commission DA 00-2228 Federal Communications Commission DA 00-2228 a b
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Cable/Orders/2000/da002388.doc
  • cable programming service tier ("CPST") subscribers for the period stated in the Refund Order and file a report with the Chief, Cable Services Bureau, stating the cumulative refund amount determined (including franchise fees and interest), describing the calculation thereof, and describing its plan to implement the refund within 60 days of Commission approval of the plan. See Sections 1.101 - 1.120 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.101 - 1.120. See also, In the Matter of Marcus Cable Associates, L.P., 12 FCC Rcd 19526 (1997). See In the Matter of Cencom Cable Income Partners II, LP, 12 FCC Rcd 7948 (1997). 8 FCC Rcd 5631 (1993). Cencom at � 22 (footnote omitted). We calculated a principal amount of $3,145.70 for
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Intl/4361-98.pdf
  • 9.0 0.0 9,407,23425.7 0.618.717.038.1 Israel $175,485,42957.1 0.424.716.5 1.2 $51,101,33253.2 0.024.022.3 0.4 $2,877,38878.4 0.014.3 6.3 1.1 393,264,98149.0 1.222.524.5 2.8 Jordan $40,585,75448.7 1.523.2 9.217.5 $4,820,44945.6 0.036.115.1 3.1 $599,11341.3 0.022.423.812.5 58,412,78535.9 3.126.311.623.1 Kuwait $53,219,05461.8 0.617.818.1 1.7 $6,765,93025.3 0.037.936.2 0.6 $11,962,07791.7 0.0 4.6 3.6 0.1 59,485,65749.3 0.924.523.0 2.3 Lebanon $51,341,29746.0 3.111.7 7.431.7 $5,989,54729.8 0.047.8 0.022.4 $3,407,20560.3 0.036.4 0.0 3.4 68,918,36725.5 4.112.7 7.250.5 Oman $6,450,78955.5 1.120.415.1 7.9 $1,813,28569.4 0.019.010.7 0.9 $1,057,69775.7 0.012.511.9 0.0 7,791,56052.6 1.323.114.7 8.3 Qatar $6,492,02065.1 0.520.6 9.2 4.7 $3,341,50654.0 0.037.2 8.8 0.0 $2,793,50912.9 0.018.768.4 0.0 9,268,09058.8 0.625.5 9.2 5.8 Saudi Arabia $115,692,73267.2 0.612.3 9.010.8 $35,610,07229.1 0.048.920.4 1.7 $6,865,38678.7 0.019.5 1.8 0.0 156,537,94550.2 0.823.110.915.0 Syria $16,282,54052.1 2.924.3 6.314.4 $3,161,32633.8 0.023.428.114.7 $2,296,07175.1 0.010.5 3.411.1 20,353,01430.3 4.213.8 8.543.2 United Arab Emirates $50,402,82960.5 0.820.8 8.9 9.0 $26,781,98135.0
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/OGC/Orders/1998/fcc98056.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/OGC/Orders/1998/fcc98056.wp
  • Commission regulation and the document is in fact served by mail (see � 1.47(f)), and the filing period for a response is 10 days or less, an additional 3 days (excluding holidays) will be allowed to all parties in the proceeding for filing a response. This paragraph (� 1.4(h)) shall not apply to documents filed pursuant to � 1.89, � 1.120(d), � 1.315(b) or � 1.316. For purposes of this paragraph service by facsimile or by electronic means shall be deemed equivalent to hand delivery. 6. Section 1.46 is amended by revising paragraphs (b) and (c) to read as follows: � 1.46 Motions for extension of time. * * * * * (b) Motions for extension of time in which to
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-08-1467A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-08-1467A1.pdf
  • a petition for reconsideration requesting reinstatement nunc pro tunc within 30 days, provided that the amendment is minor and does not alter the fair distribution preference. See 47 C.F.R. � 73.3522(b)(1). A tentative selectee that is unable to cure the defect is disqualified. See 5 U.S.C. �� 702, 704, 706; 47 U.S.C. �� 309(d), 402(b), 405; 47 C.F.R. �� 1.106-08, 1.120, 73.7004. In cases that involve separate mutually exclusive groups but present common issues, the petitions or appeals may be filed jointly or may be consolidated at the discretion of the Commission or the court. See, e.g., FED. R. APP. P. 3(b). Federal Communications Commission DA 08-1467 Federal Communications Commission DA 08-1467 � tm � � � Y ] � �
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-09-2172A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-09-2172A1.pdf
  • tunc within 30 days. The amendment must be minor and may not alter the fair distribution preference. See 47 C.F.R. � 73.3522(b)(1). The staff will not reinstate the application of a tentative selectee that is unable to cure all defects. See 5 U.S.C. �� 702, 704, and 706; 47 U.S.C. �� 309(d), 402(b), and 405; 47 C.F.R. �� 1.106-08, 1.115, 1.120, and 73.7004. In cases that involve separate mutually exclusive groups but present common issues, the petitions or appeals may be filed jointly or may be consolidated at the discretion of the Commission or the court. See, e.g., FED. R. APP. P. 3(b). Federal Communications Commission DA 09-2172 Federal Communications Commission DA 09-2172 . / � � � � � �
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-09-2596A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-09-2596A1.pdf
  • tunc within 30 days. The amendment must be minor and may not alter the fair distribution preference. See 47 C.F.R. � 73.3522(b)(1). The staff will not reinstate the application of a tentative selectee that is unable to cure all defects. See 5 U.S.C. �� 702, 704, and 706; 47 U.S.C. �� 309(d), 402(b), and 405; 47 C.F.R. �� 1.106-08, 1.115, 1.120, and 73.7004. In cases that involve separate mutually exclusive groups but present common issues, the petitions or appeals may be filed jointly or may be consolidated at the discretion of the Commission or the court. See, e.g., FED. R. APP. P. 3(b). Federal Communications Commission DA 09-2596 Federal Communications Commission DA 09-2596 - � � � � � � (R)
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-09-735A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-09-735A1.pdf
  • tunc within 30 days. The amendment must be minor and may not alter the fair distribution preference. See 47 C.F.R. � 73.3522(b)(1). The staff will not reinstate the application of a tentative selectee that is unable to cure all defects. See 5 U.S.C. �� 702, 704, and 706; 47 U.S.C. �� 309(d), 402(b), and 405; 47 C.F.R. �� 1.106-08, 1.115, 1.120, and 73.7004. In cases that involve separate mutually exclusive groups but present common issues, the petitions or appeals may be filed jointly or may be consolidated at the discretion of the Commission or the court. See, e.g., FED. R. APP. P. 3(b). Federal Communications Commission DA 09-735 Federal Communications Commission DA 09-735 ... � � � � � � �
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/FCC-07-40A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/FCC-07-40A1.pdf
  • finds a new or novel question; or (3) finds a substantial and material question of fact). The Commission or Administrative Law Judge would then resolve new and novel or substantial and material factual matters and, if necessary, conduct a new comparative point hearing. See 5 U.S.C. �� 702, 704, 706; 47 U.S.C. �� 309(d), 402(b), 405; 47 C.F.R. �� 1.106-08, 1.120, 73.7004. In cases that involve separate mutually exclusive groups but present common issues, the petitions or appeals may be filed jointly or may be consolidated at the discretion of the Commission or the court. See, e.g., FED. R. APP. P. 3(b). 47 C.F.R. � 73.3004. The ``no'' designation is used when applicants propose to serve different communities, but each certifies
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1467A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1467A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1467A1.txt
  • a petition for reconsideration requesting reinstatement nunc pro tunc within 30 days, provided that the amendment is minor and does not alter the fair distribution preference. See 47 C.F.R. � 73.3522(b)(1). A tentative selectee that is unable to cure the defect is disqualified. See 5 U.S.C. �� 702, 704, 706; 47 U.S.C. �� 309(d), 402(b), 405; 47 C.F.R. �� 1.106-08, 1.120, 73.7004. In cases that involve separate mutually exclusive groups but present common issues, the petitions or appeals may be filed jointly or may be consolidated at the discretion of the Commission or the court. See, e.g., FED. R. APP. P. 3(b). Federal Communications Commission DA 08-1467 Federal Communications Commission DA 08-1467 � tm � � � Y ] � �
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1537A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1537A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1537A1.txt
  • a petition for reconsideration requesting reinstatement nunc pro tunc within 30 days, provided that the amendment is minor and does not alter the fair distribution preference. See 47 C.F.R. � 73.3522(b)(1). A tentative selectee that is unable to cure the defect is disqualified. See 5 U.S.C. �� 702, 704, 706; 47 U.S.C. �� 309(d), 402(b), 405; 47 C.F.R. �� 1.106-08, 1.120, 73.7004. In cases that involve separate mutually exclusive groups but present common issues, the petitions or appeals may be filed jointly or may be consolidated at the discretion of the Commission or the court. See, e.g., FED. R. APP. P. 3(b). Federal Communications Commission DA 08-1537 Federal Communications Commission DA 08-1537 0 1 � � � � � � �
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1949A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1949A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1949A1.txt
  • a petition for reconsideration requesting reinstatement nunc pro tunc within 30 days, provided that the amendment is minor and does not alter the fair distribution preference. See 47 C.F.R. � 73.3522(b)(1). A tentative selectee that is unable to cure the defect is disqualified. See 5 U.S.C. �� 702, 704, 706; 47 U.S.C. �� 309(d), 402(b), 405; 47 C.F.R. �� 1.106-08, 1.120, 73.7004. In cases that involve separate mutually exclusive groups but present common issues, the petitions or appeals may be filed jointly or may be consolidated at the discretion of the Commission or the court. See, e.g., FED. R. APP. P. 3(b). Federal Communications Commission DA 08-1949 Federal Communications Commission DA 08-1949 S T � � _H _H � K l
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2717A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2717A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2717A1.txt
  • a petition for reconsideration requesting reinstatement nunc pro tunc within 30 days, provided that the amendment is minor and does not alter the fair distribution preference. See 47 C.F.R. � 73.3522(b)(1). A tentative selectee that is unable to cure the defect is disqualified. See 5 U.S.C. �� 702, 704, 706; 47 U.S.C. �� 309(d), 402(b), 405; 47 C.F.R. �� 1.106-08, 1.120, 73.7004. In cases that involve separate mutually exclusive groups but present common issues, the petitions or appeals may be filed jointly or may be consolidated at the discretion of the Commission or the court. See, e.g., FED. R. APP. P. 3(b). Federal Communications Commission DA 08-2717 Federal Communications Commission DA 08-2717 # $ � � � 6 Q } �
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2172A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2172A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2172A1.txt
  • tunc within 30 days. The amendment must be minor and may not alter the fair distribution preference. See 47 C.F.R. � 73.3522(b)(1). The staff will not reinstate the application of a tentative selectee that is unable to cure all defects. See 5 U.S.C. �� 702, 704, and 706; 47 U.S.C. �� 309(d), 402(b), and 405; 47 C.F.R. �� 1.106-08, 1.115, 1.120, and 73.7004. In cases that involve separate mutually exclusive groups but present common issues, the petitions or appeals may be filed jointly or may be consolidated at the discretion of the Commission or the court. See, e.g., FED. R. APP. P. 3(b). Federal Communications Commission DA 09-2172 Federal Communications Commission DA 09-2172 . / � � � � � �
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2381A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2381A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2381A1.txt
  • tunc within 30 days. The amendment must be minor and may not alter the fair distribution preference. See 47 C.F.R. � 73.3522(b)(1). The staff will not reinstate the application of a tentative selectee that is unable to cure all defects. See 5 U.S.C. �� 702, 704, and 706; 47 U.S.C. �� 309(d), 402(b), and 405; 47 C.F.R. �� 1.106-08, 1.115, 1.120, and 73.7004. In cases that involve separate mutually exclusive groups but present common issues, the petitions or appeals may be filed jointly or may be consolidated at the discretion of the Commission or the court. See, e.g., FED. R. APP. P. 3(b). Federal Communications Commission DA 09-2381 Federal Communications Commission DA 09-2381 � � � � � � 0 0
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2596A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2596A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2596A1.txt
  • tunc within 30 days. The amendment must be minor and may not alter the fair distribution preference. See 47 C.F.R. � 73.3522(b)(1). The staff will not reinstate the application of a tentative selectee that is unable to cure all defects. See 5 U.S.C. �� 702, 704, and 706; 47 U.S.C. �� 309(d), 402(b), and 405; 47 C.F.R. �� 1.106-08, 1.115, 1.120, and 73.7004. In cases that involve separate mutually exclusive groups but present common issues, the petitions or appeals may be filed jointly or may be consolidated at the discretion of the Commission or the court. See, e.g., FED. R. APP. P. 3(b). Federal Communications Commission DA 09-2596 Federal Communications Commission DA 09-2596 - � � � � � � (R)
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-53A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-53A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-53A1.txt
  • Cable programming service 78 45.4 1.308 67 47.5 1.310 Expanded basic service 78 72.3 1.002 67 73.3 1.240 Wireless MVPD subgroup Basic cable service 33 23.7 0.947 32 23.3 0.788 Cable programming service 33 50.2 0.975 32 50.3 0.969 Expanded basic service 33 73.9 0.787 32 73.6 0.620 Low penetration test subgroup Basic cable service 68 23.1 1.104 66 23.0 1.120 Cable programming service 68 47.8 1.186 66 47.8 1.229 Expanded basic service 68 70.8 0.919 66 70.8 0.910 Source: 2007/2008 cable price survey. Attachment 10 Other Programming Channels January 1, 2006 Sample Group Local Broadcast Stations in HD Format (1) Most Highly Subscribed Digital Tier (2) N Mean S.E. N Mean S.E. Sample groups overall 754 4.3 0.08 725 40.6
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-735A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-735A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-735A1.txt
  • tunc within 30 days. The amendment must be minor and may not alter the fair distribution preference. See 47 C.F.R. � 73.3522(b)(1). The staff will not reinstate the application of a tentative selectee that is unable to cure all defects. See 5 U.S.C. �� 702, 704, and 706; 47 U.S.C. �� 309(d), 402(b), and 405; 47 C.F.R. �� 1.106-08, 1.115, 1.120, and 73.7004. In cases that involve separate mutually exclusive groups but present common issues, the petitions or appeals may be filed jointly or may be consolidated at the discretion of the Commission or the court. See, e.g., FED. R. APP. P. 3(b). Federal Communications Commission DA 09-735 Federal Communications Commission DA 09-735 ... � � � � � � �
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2072A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2072A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2072A1.txt
  • C.F.R. � 73.3522(b)(1). The staff will not reinstate the application of a tentative selectee that is unable to cure all defects. See id. � 1.106 (a) (1). See also Patrick J. Vaughn, Esq., Letter, 22 FCC Rcd 11165 (MB 2007). See 5 U.S.C. �� 702, 704, and 706; 47 U.S.C. �� 309(d), 402(b), and 405; 47 C.F.R. �� 1.106-08, 1.115, 1.120, and 73.7004. In cases that involve separate mutually exclusive groups but present common issues, the petitions or appeals may be filed jointly or may be consolidated at the discretion of the Commission or the court. See, e.g., FED. R. APP. P. 3(b). Federal Communications Commission DA 10-2072 Federal Communications Commission DA 10-2072 ` a � � � � � 0
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1658A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1658A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1658A1.txt
  • amends the following rules in Part 1, Subpart A, General Rules of Practice and Procedure, to delete an obsolete rule and obsolete references, as follows: Section 1.115(b)(2), which pertains to applications for review of actions taken pursuant to delegated authority, is amended to delete ``Except as provided in paragraph (b)(5) of this section'' because paragraph (b)(5) has been deleted. Section 1.120, which describes the Commission's former ``protest'' process, is deleted because, by its express terms, it does not apply to applications filed on or after December 12, 1960. As a result, this section is without current legal effect and is obsolete. In addition, this Order deletes references to section 1.120 from other rules. Specifically, in section 1.4(h), the reference to section
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-310874A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-310874A1.txt
  • Fund) and the TRS Fund administrator's performance after two years (i.e. in 1995). Removed note that certain provisions of the rule are not effective until OMB approval. OMB approval received August 2000. 64.604(c)(5)(iii)(J) 64.2401, removed [Note] 10/13/11 Describes the Commission's former "protest" process. By its express terms, it does not apply to applications filed on or after December 12, 1960. 1.120 Adopted 9/30/11 pending FR publication These sections pertain to comparative hearings for broadcast license renewal applications. The enactment of section 309(k) of the Communications Act of 1934 eliminated comparative broadcast hearings for license renewal applicants. 1.227 (b)(6) 1.229(b)(2) Adopted 9/30/11 pending FR publication Pertains to comparative hearings involving applicants for new commercial broadcast facilities and calls for the production of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-314166A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-314166A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-314166A1.txt
  • the TRS Fund administrator's performance after two years (i.e. in 1995). Removed note that certain provisions of the rule are not effective until OMB approval. OMB approval received August 2000. 64.604(c)(5)(iii)(J) 64.2401, removed [Note] 10/13/11 Eliminated rule describing the Commission's former ``protest'' process, which by its express terms does not apply to applications filed on or after December 12, 1960. 1.120 11/16/11 Eliminated rule sections pertaining to comparative hearings for broadcast license renewal applications. The enactment of section 309(k) of the Communications Act of 1934 eliminated comparative broadcast hearings for license renewal applicants. 1.227(b)(6) 1.229(b)(2) 11/16/11 Eliminated rule sections pertaining to comparative hearings involving applicants for new commercial broadcast facilities and calling for the production of a Standardized Integration Statement and
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-40A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-40A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-40A1.txt
  • finds a new or novel question; or (3) finds a substantial and material question of fact). The Commission or Administrative Law Judge would then resolve new and novel or substantial and material factual matters and, if necessary, conduct a new comparative point hearing. See 5 U.S.C. �� 702, 704, 706; 47 U.S.C. �� 309(d), 402(b), 405; 47 C.F.R. �� 1.106-08, 1.120, 73.7004. In cases that involve separate mutually exclusive groups but present common issues, the petitions or appeals may be filed jointly or may be consolidated at the discretion of the Commission or the court. See, e.g., FED. R. APP. P. 3(b). 47 C.F.R. � 73.3004. The ``no'' designation is used when applicants propose to serve different communities, but each certifies
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-29A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-29A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-29A1.txt
  • selected application following point hearing, and award of permit on a non-comparative basis to only remaining acceptable applicant). See generally NCE Omnibus, 22 FCC Rcd at 6162 n.230 (2007) (standards for staff evaluation of petitions). See NCE MO&O, 16 FCC Rcd at 5104-05. See 5 U.S.C. �� 702, 704, 706; 47 U.S.C. �� 309(d), 402(b), 405; 47 C.F.R. �� 1.106-08, 1.120, 73.7004. In cases that involve separate mutually exclusive groups but present common issues, the petitions or appeals may be filed jointly or may be consolidated at the discretion of the Commission or the court. See, e.g., FED. R. APP. P. 3(b). The ``no'' designation is used when applicants propose to serve different communities, but each certifies that it would not
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-69A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-69A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-69A1.txt
  • (permitting staff dismissal of defective application tentatively selected in a point hearing, and staff award of permit on a non-comparative basis to only remaining acceptable applicant). See generally NCE Omnibus, 22 FCC Rcd at 6162 n.230 (2007) (standards for staff evaluation of petitions). See 5 U.S.C. �� 702, 704, 706; 47 U.S.C. �� 309(d), 402(b), 405; 47 C.F.R. �� 1.106-08, 1.120, 73.7004. In cases that involve separate mutually exclusive groups but present common issues, the petitions or appeals may be filed jointly or may be consolidated at the discretion of the Commission or a reviewing court. See, e.g., FED. R. APP. P. 3(b). The ``no'' designation is used when applicants propose to serve different communities, but each certifies that it would
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-9A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-9A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-9A1.txt
  • permitting staff dismissal of defective application tentatively selected in a point hearing, and staff award of permit on a non-comparative basis to only remaining acceptable applicant). See generally NCE Omnibus, 22 FCC Rcd at 6162 n.230 (2007) (standards for staff evaluation of petitions). See 5 U.S.C. �� 702, 704, 706; 47 U.S.C. �� 309(d), 402(b), 405; 47 C.F.R. �� 1.106-08, 1.120, 73.7004. In cases that involve separate mutually exclusive groups but present common issues, the petitions or appeals may be filed jointly or may be consolidated at the discretion of the Commission or a reviewing court. See, e.g., FED. R. APP. P. 3(b). The ``no'' designation is used when applicants propose to serve different communities, but each certifies that it would
• http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/OGC/Orders/1998/fcc98056.pdf http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/OGC/Orders/1998/fcc98056.wp
  • Commission regulation and the document is in fact served by mail (see � 1.47(f)), and the filing period for a response is 10 days or less, an additional 3 days (excluding holidays) will be allowed to all parties in the proceeding for filing a response. This paragraph (� 1.4(h)) shall not apply to documents filed pursuant to � 1.89, � 1.120(d), � 1.315(b) or � 1.316. For purposes of this paragraph service by facsimile or by electronic means shall be deemed equivalent to hand delivery. 6. Section 1.46 is amended by revising paragraphs (b) and (c) to read as follows: � 1.46 Motions for extension of time. * * * * * (b) Motions for extension of time in which to
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/16/releases/da981138.pdf http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/16/releases/da981138.txt http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/16/releases/da981138.wp
  • prime interest to Nextel, and, in Federal Communications Commission DA 98-1138 32 Id. at 9. 33 See 47 C.F.R. � 1.2105(c); see also Mercury PCS I, 12 FCC Rcd. 17970 (WTB, 1997) (Mercury) (winning bidder in PCS auction assessed fine for bid signaling strategies). Nextel Opposition at 10. 34 35 Id. 36 See para. 3, supra. 37 47 C.F.R. � 1.120(c). See CMRS Second Report and Order, 9 FCC Rcd. 2348, 2386-87 (1994) (anti-collusion rule adopted). 38 39 See Mercury, 12 FCC Rcd. at 17977 at n.31. 40 Id. at n.30. 41 Id. at n.32. 5 exchange, Nextel would yield certain A block licenses to competing bidders. IE cites Nextel's conduct in the 32 Reno EA as illustrative of its allegations.
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/commoperators/element6.doc
  • water D.None of the above 6A294 C An Edison storage battery should not be charged at less than the manufacturer's specified rate: A.In order that the capacity of the battery shall be maximum after charge B.The chemical reactions of the Edison-type cell C.A & B D.None of the above 6A295 D Your emergency battery has a specific gravity reading of 1.120. What should be done? A.Place the battery on charge at once B.Bring the electrolyte level to about 1/4 inch above the top of the plates C.The battery will be fully charged when the specific gravity reads 1.280 to 1.300 D.All of the above 6A296 A What care should be taken with selecting water to add to a storage cell? A.It
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Cable/Orders/2000/da002228.doc
  • refund amount that differs from the calculation prescribed in the Refund Order. Operator did not file a petition for reconsideration or an application for review of the Refund Order. Consequently, Operator is attempting to raise in its refund plan an issue that it failed to properly place before the Commission in accordance with the Commission's rules. See Sections 1.101 - 1.120 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.101 - 1.120. A refund plan is not a substitute for the reconsideration and review process and issues raised in refund plans will not be considered. See also, In the Matter of Marcus Cable Associates, L.P., 12 FCC Rcd 19526 (1997). Federal Communications Commission DA 00-2228 Federal Communications Commission DA 00-2228 a b
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Cable/Orders/2000/da002388.doc
  • cable programming service tier ("CPST") subscribers for the period stated in the Refund Order and file a report with the Chief, Cable Services Bureau, stating the cumulative refund amount determined (including franchise fees and interest), describing the calculation thereof, and describing its plan to implement the refund within 60 days of Commission approval of the plan. See Sections 1.101 - 1.120 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.101 - 1.120. See also, In the Matter of Marcus Cable Associates, L.P., 12 FCC Rcd 19526 (1997). See In the Matter of Cencom Cable Income Partners II, LP, 12 FCC Rcd 7948 (1997). 8 FCC Rcd 5631 (1993). Cencom at � 22 (footnote omitted). We calculated a principal amount of $3,145.70 for
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Intl/4361-98.pdf
  • 9.0 0.0 9,407,23425.7 0.618.717.038.1 Israel $175,485,42957.1 0.424.716.5 1.2 $51,101,33253.2 0.024.022.3 0.4 $2,877,38878.4 0.014.3 6.3 1.1 393,264,98149.0 1.222.524.5 2.8 Jordan $40,585,75448.7 1.523.2 9.217.5 $4,820,44945.6 0.036.115.1 3.1 $599,11341.3 0.022.423.812.5 58,412,78535.9 3.126.311.623.1 Kuwait $53,219,05461.8 0.617.818.1 1.7 $6,765,93025.3 0.037.936.2 0.6 $11,962,07791.7 0.0 4.6 3.6 0.1 59,485,65749.3 0.924.523.0 2.3 Lebanon $51,341,29746.0 3.111.7 7.431.7 $5,989,54729.8 0.047.8 0.022.4 $3,407,20560.3 0.036.4 0.0 3.4 68,918,36725.5 4.112.7 7.250.5 Oman $6,450,78955.5 1.120.415.1 7.9 $1,813,28569.4 0.019.010.7 0.9 $1,057,69775.7 0.012.511.9 0.0 7,791,56052.6 1.323.114.7 8.3 Qatar $6,492,02065.1 0.520.6 9.2 4.7 $3,341,50654.0 0.037.2 8.8 0.0 $2,793,50912.9 0.018.768.4 0.0 9,268,09058.8 0.625.5 9.2 5.8 Saudi Arabia $115,692,73267.2 0.612.3 9.010.8 $35,610,07229.1 0.048.920.4 1.7 $6,865,38678.7 0.019.5 1.8 0.0 156,537,94550.2 0.823.110.915.0 Syria $16,282,54052.1 2.924.3 6.314.4 $3,161,32633.8 0.023.428.114.7 $2,296,07175.1 0.010.5 3.411.1 20,353,01430.3 4.213.8 8.543.2 United Arab Emirates $50,402,82960.5 0.820.8 8.9 9.0 $26,781,98135.0
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/OGC/Orders/1998/fcc98056.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/OGC/Orders/1998/fcc98056.wp
  • Commission regulation and the document is in fact served by mail (see � 1.47(f)), and the filing period for a response is 10 days or less, an additional 3 days (excluding holidays) will be allowed to all parties in the proceeding for filing a response. This paragraph (� 1.4(h)) shall not apply to documents filed pursuant to � 1.89, � 1.120(d), � 1.315(b) or � 1.316. For purposes of this paragraph service by facsimile or by electronic means shall be deemed equivalent to hand delivery. 6. Section 1.46 is amended by revising paragraphs (b) and (c) to read as follows: � 1.46 Motions for extension of time. * * * * * (b) Motions for extension of time in which to
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-08-1467A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-08-1467A1.pdf
  • a petition for reconsideration requesting reinstatement nunc pro tunc within 30 days, provided that the amendment is minor and does not alter the fair distribution preference. See 47 C.F.R. � 73.3522(b)(1). A tentative selectee that is unable to cure the defect is disqualified. See 5 U.S.C. �� 702, 704, 706; 47 U.S.C. �� 309(d), 402(b), 405; 47 C.F.R. �� 1.106-08, 1.120, 73.7004. In cases that involve separate mutually exclusive groups but present common issues, the petitions or appeals may be filed jointly or may be consolidated at the discretion of the Commission or the court. See, e.g., FED. R. APP. P. 3(b). Federal Communications Commission DA 08-1467 Federal Communications Commission DA 08-1467 � tm � � � Y ] � �
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-09-2172A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-09-2172A1.pdf
  • tunc within 30 days. The amendment must be minor and may not alter the fair distribution preference. See 47 C.F.R. � 73.3522(b)(1). The staff will not reinstate the application of a tentative selectee that is unable to cure all defects. See 5 U.S.C. �� 702, 704, and 706; 47 U.S.C. �� 309(d), 402(b), and 405; 47 C.F.R. �� 1.106-08, 1.115, 1.120, and 73.7004. In cases that involve separate mutually exclusive groups but present common issues, the petitions or appeals may be filed jointly or may be consolidated at the discretion of the Commission or the court. See, e.g., FED. R. APP. P. 3(b). Federal Communications Commission DA 09-2172 Federal Communications Commission DA 09-2172 . / � � � � � �
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-09-2596A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-09-2596A1.pdf
  • tunc within 30 days. The amendment must be minor and may not alter the fair distribution preference. See 47 C.F.R. � 73.3522(b)(1). The staff will not reinstate the application of a tentative selectee that is unable to cure all defects. See 5 U.S.C. �� 702, 704, and 706; 47 U.S.C. �� 309(d), 402(b), and 405; 47 C.F.R. �� 1.106-08, 1.115, 1.120, and 73.7004. In cases that involve separate mutually exclusive groups but present common issues, the petitions or appeals may be filed jointly or may be consolidated at the discretion of the Commission or the court. See, e.g., FED. R. APP. P. 3(b). Federal Communications Commission DA 09-2596 Federal Communications Commission DA 09-2596 - � � � � � � (R)
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-09-735A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-09-735A1.pdf
  • tunc within 30 days. The amendment must be minor and may not alter the fair distribution preference. See 47 C.F.R. � 73.3522(b)(1). The staff will not reinstate the application of a tentative selectee that is unable to cure all defects. See 5 U.S.C. �� 702, 704, and 706; 47 U.S.C. �� 309(d), 402(b), and 405; 47 C.F.R. �� 1.106-08, 1.115, 1.120, and 73.7004. In cases that involve separate mutually exclusive groups but present common issues, the petitions or appeals may be filed jointly or may be consolidated at the discretion of the Commission or the court. See, e.g., FED. R. APP. P. 3(b). Federal Communications Commission DA 09-735 Federal Communications Commission DA 09-735 ... � � � � � � �
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/FCC-07-40A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/FCC-07-40A1.pdf
  • finds a new or novel question; or (3) finds a substantial and material question of fact). The Commission or Administrative Law Judge would then resolve new and novel or substantial and material factual matters and, if necessary, conduct a new comparative point hearing. See 5 U.S.C. �� 702, 704, 706; 47 U.S.C. �� 309(d), 402(b), 405; 47 C.F.R. �� 1.106-08, 1.120, 73.7004. In cases that involve separate mutually exclusive groups but present common issues, the petitions or appeals may be filed jointly or may be consolidated at the discretion of the Commission or the court. See, e.g., FED. R. APP. P. 3(b). 47 C.F.R. � 73.3004. The ``no'' designation is used when applicants propose to serve different communities, but each certifies
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1467A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1467A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1467A1.txt
  • a petition for reconsideration requesting reinstatement nunc pro tunc within 30 days, provided that the amendment is minor and does not alter the fair distribution preference. See 47 C.F.R. � 73.3522(b)(1). A tentative selectee that is unable to cure the defect is disqualified. See 5 U.S.C. �� 702, 704, 706; 47 U.S.C. �� 309(d), 402(b), 405; 47 C.F.R. �� 1.106-08, 1.120, 73.7004. In cases that involve separate mutually exclusive groups but present common issues, the petitions or appeals may be filed jointly or may be consolidated at the discretion of the Commission or the court. See, e.g., FED. R. APP. P. 3(b). Federal Communications Commission DA 08-1467 Federal Communications Commission DA 08-1467 � tm � � � Y ] � �
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1537A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1537A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1537A1.txt
  • a petition for reconsideration requesting reinstatement nunc pro tunc within 30 days, provided that the amendment is minor and does not alter the fair distribution preference. See 47 C.F.R. � 73.3522(b)(1). A tentative selectee that is unable to cure the defect is disqualified. See 5 U.S.C. �� 702, 704, 706; 47 U.S.C. �� 309(d), 402(b), 405; 47 C.F.R. �� 1.106-08, 1.120, 73.7004. In cases that involve separate mutually exclusive groups but present common issues, the petitions or appeals may be filed jointly or may be consolidated at the discretion of the Commission or the court. See, e.g., FED. R. APP. P. 3(b). Federal Communications Commission DA 08-1537 Federal Communications Commission DA 08-1537 0 1 � � � � � � �
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1949A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1949A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1949A1.txt
  • a petition for reconsideration requesting reinstatement nunc pro tunc within 30 days, provided that the amendment is minor and does not alter the fair distribution preference. See 47 C.F.R. � 73.3522(b)(1). A tentative selectee that is unable to cure the defect is disqualified. See 5 U.S.C. �� 702, 704, 706; 47 U.S.C. �� 309(d), 402(b), 405; 47 C.F.R. �� 1.106-08, 1.120, 73.7004. In cases that involve separate mutually exclusive groups but present common issues, the petitions or appeals may be filed jointly or may be consolidated at the discretion of the Commission or the court. See, e.g., FED. R. APP. P. 3(b). Federal Communications Commission DA 08-1949 Federal Communications Commission DA 08-1949 S T � � _H _H � K l
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2717A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2717A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2717A1.txt
  • a petition for reconsideration requesting reinstatement nunc pro tunc within 30 days, provided that the amendment is minor and does not alter the fair distribution preference. See 47 C.F.R. � 73.3522(b)(1). A tentative selectee that is unable to cure the defect is disqualified. See 5 U.S.C. �� 702, 704, 706; 47 U.S.C. �� 309(d), 402(b), 405; 47 C.F.R. �� 1.106-08, 1.120, 73.7004. In cases that involve separate mutually exclusive groups but present common issues, the petitions or appeals may be filed jointly or may be consolidated at the discretion of the Commission or the court. See, e.g., FED. R. APP. P. 3(b). Federal Communications Commission DA 08-2717 Federal Communications Commission DA 08-2717 # $ � � � 6 Q } �
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2172A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2172A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2172A1.txt
  • tunc within 30 days. The amendment must be minor and may not alter the fair distribution preference. See 47 C.F.R. � 73.3522(b)(1). The staff will not reinstate the application of a tentative selectee that is unable to cure all defects. See 5 U.S.C. �� 702, 704, and 706; 47 U.S.C. �� 309(d), 402(b), and 405; 47 C.F.R. �� 1.106-08, 1.115, 1.120, and 73.7004. In cases that involve separate mutually exclusive groups but present common issues, the petitions or appeals may be filed jointly or may be consolidated at the discretion of the Commission or the court. See, e.g., FED. R. APP. P. 3(b). Federal Communications Commission DA 09-2172 Federal Communications Commission DA 09-2172 . / � � � � � �
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2381A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2381A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2381A1.txt
  • tunc within 30 days. The amendment must be minor and may not alter the fair distribution preference. See 47 C.F.R. � 73.3522(b)(1). The staff will not reinstate the application of a tentative selectee that is unable to cure all defects. See 5 U.S.C. �� 702, 704, and 706; 47 U.S.C. �� 309(d), 402(b), and 405; 47 C.F.R. �� 1.106-08, 1.115, 1.120, and 73.7004. In cases that involve separate mutually exclusive groups but present common issues, the petitions or appeals may be filed jointly or may be consolidated at the discretion of the Commission or the court. See, e.g., FED. R. APP. P. 3(b). Federal Communications Commission DA 09-2381 Federal Communications Commission DA 09-2381 � � � � � � 0 0
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2596A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2596A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2596A1.txt
  • tunc within 30 days. The amendment must be minor and may not alter the fair distribution preference. See 47 C.F.R. � 73.3522(b)(1). The staff will not reinstate the application of a tentative selectee that is unable to cure all defects. See 5 U.S.C. �� 702, 704, and 706; 47 U.S.C. �� 309(d), 402(b), and 405; 47 C.F.R. �� 1.106-08, 1.115, 1.120, and 73.7004. In cases that involve separate mutually exclusive groups but present common issues, the petitions or appeals may be filed jointly or may be consolidated at the discretion of the Commission or the court. See, e.g., FED. R. APP. P. 3(b). Federal Communications Commission DA 09-2596 Federal Communications Commission DA 09-2596 - � � � � � � (R)
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-53A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-53A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-53A1.txt
  • Cable programming service 78 45.4 1.308 67 47.5 1.310 Expanded basic service 78 72.3 1.002 67 73.3 1.240 Wireless MVPD subgroup Basic cable service 33 23.7 0.947 32 23.3 0.788 Cable programming service 33 50.2 0.975 32 50.3 0.969 Expanded basic service 33 73.9 0.787 32 73.6 0.620 Low penetration test subgroup Basic cable service 68 23.1 1.104 66 23.0 1.120 Cable programming service 68 47.8 1.186 66 47.8 1.229 Expanded basic service 68 70.8 0.919 66 70.8 0.910 Source: 2007/2008 cable price survey. Attachment 10 Other Programming Channels January 1, 2006 Sample Group Local Broadcast Stations in HD Format (1) Most Highly Subscribed Digital Tier (2) N Mean S.E. N Mean S.E. Sample groups overall 754 4.3 0.08 725 40.6
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-735A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-735A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-735A1.txt
  • tunc within 30 days. The amendment must be minor and may not alter the fair distribution preference. See 47 C.F.R. � 73.3522(b)(1). The staff will not reinstate the application of a tentative selectee that is unable to cure all defects. See 5 U.S.C. �� 702, 704, and 706; 47 U.S.C. �� 309(d), 402(b), and 405; 47 C.F.R. �� 1.106-08, 1.115, 1.120, and 73.7004. In cases that involve separate mutually exclusive groups but present common issues, the petitions or appeals may be filed jointly or may be consolidated at the discretion of the Commission or the court. See, e.g., FED. R. APP. P. 3(b). Federal Communications Commission DA 09-735 Federal Communications Commission DA 09-735 ... � � � � � � �
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2072A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2072A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2072A1.txt
  • C.F.R. � 73.3522(b)(1). The staff will not reinstate the application of a tentative selectee that is unable to cure all defects. See id. � 1.106 (a) (1). See also Patrick J. Vaughn, Esq., Letter, 22 FCC Rcd 11165 (MB 2007). See 5 U.S.C. �� 702, 704, and 706; 47 U.S.C. �� 309(d), 402(b), and 405; 47 C.F.R. �� 1.106-08, 1.115, 1.120, and 73.7004. In cases that involve separate mutually exclusive groups but present common issues, the petitions or appeals may be filed jointly or may be consolidated at the discretion of the Commission or the court. See, e.g., FED. R. APP. P. 3(b). Federal Communications Commission DA 10-2072 Federal Communications Commission DA 10-2072 ` a � � � � � 0
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1658A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1658A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1658A1.txt
  • amends the following rules in Part 1, Subpart A, General Rules of Practice and Procedure, to delete an obsolete rule and obsolete references, as follows: Section 1.115(b)(2), which pertains to applications for review of actions taken pursuant to delegated authority, is amended to delete ``Except as provided in paragraph (b)(5) of this section'' because paragraph (b)(5) has been deleted. Section 1.120, which describes the Commission's former ``protest'' process, is deleted because, by its express terms, it does not apply to applications filed on or after December 12, 1960. As a result, this section is without current legal effect and is obsolete. In addition, this Order deletes references to section 1.120 from other rules. Specifically, in section 1.4(h), the reference to section
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-310874A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-310874A1.txt
  • Fund) and the TRS Fund administrator's performance after two years (i.e. in 1995). Removed note that certain provisions of the rule are not effective until OMB approval. OMB approval received August 2000. 64.604(c)(5)(iii)(J) 64.2401, removed [Note] 10/13/11 Describes the Commission's former "protest" process. By its express terms, it does not apply to applications filed on or after December 12, 1960. 1.120 Adopted 9/30/11 pending FR publication These sections pertain to comparative hearings for broadcast license renewal applications. The enactment of section 309(k) of the Communications Act of 1934 eliminated comparative broadcast hearings for license renewal applicants. 1.227 (b)(6) 1.229(b)(2) Adopted 9/30/11 pending FR publication Pertains to comparative hearings involving applicants for new commercial broadcast facilities and calls for the production of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-314166A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-314166A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-314166A1.txt
  • the TRS Fund administrator's performance after two years (i.e. in 1995). Removed note that certain provisions of the rule are not effective until OMB approval. OMB approval received August 2000. 64.604(c)(5)(iii)(J) 64.2401, removed [Note] 10/13/11 Eliminated rule describing the Commission's former ``protest'' process, which by its express terms does not apply to applications filed on or after December 12, 1960. 1.120 11/16/11 Eliminated rule sections pertaining to comparative hearings for broadcast license renewal applications. The enactment of section 309(k) of the Communications Act of 1934 eliminated comparative broadcast hearings for license renewal applicants. 1.227(b)(6) 1.229(b)(2) 11/16/11 Eliminated rule sections pertaining to comparative hearings involving applicants for new commercial broadcast facilities and calling for the production of a Standardized Integration Statement and
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-40A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-40A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-40A1.txt
  • finds a new or novel question; or (3) finds a substantial and material question of fact). The Commission or Administrative Law Judge would then resolve new and novel or substantial and material factual matters and, if necessary, conduct a new comparative point hearing. See 5 U.S.C. �� 702, 704, 706; 47 U.S.C. �� 309(d), 402(b), 405; 47 C.F.R. �� 1.106-08, 1.120, 73.7004. In cases that involve separate mutually exclusive groups but present common issues, the petitions or appeals may be filed jointly or may be consolidated at the discretion of the Commission or the court. See, e.g., FED. R. APP. P. 3(b). 47 C.F.R. � 73.3004. The ``no'' designation is used when applicants propose to serve different communities, but each certifies
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-29A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-29A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-29A1.txt
  • selected application following point hearing, and award of permit on a non-comparative basis to only remaining acceptable applicant). See generally NCE Omnibus, 22 FCC Rcd at 6162 n.230 (2007) (standards for staff evaluation of petitions). See NCE MO&O, 16 FCC Rcd at 5104-05. See 5 U.S.C. �� 702, 704, 706; 47 U.S.C. �� 309(d), 402(b), 405; 47 C.F.R. �� 1.106-08, 1.120, 73.7004. In cases that involve separate mutually exclusive groups but present common issues, the petitions or appeals may be filed jointly or may be consolidated at the discretion of the Commission or the court. See, e.g., FED. R. APP. P. 3(b). The ``no'' designation is used when applicants propose to serve different communities, but each certifies that it would not
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-69A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-69A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-69A1.txt
  • (permitting staff dismissal of defective application tentatively selected in a point hearing, and staff award of permit on a non-comparative basis to only remaining acceptable applicant). See generally NCE Omnibus, 22 FCC Rcd at 6162 n.230 (2007) (standards for staff evaluation of petitions). See 5 U.S.C. �� 702, 704, 706; 47 U.S.C. �� 309(d), 402(b), 405; 47 C.F.R. �� 1.106-08, 1.120, 73.7004. In cases that involve separate mutually exclusive groups but present common issues, the petitions or appeals may be filed jointly or may be consolidated at the discretion of the Commission or a reviewing court. See, e.g., FED. R. APP. P. 3(b). The ``no'' designation is used when applicants propose to serve different communities, but each certifies that it would
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-9A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-9A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-9A1.txt
  • permitting staff dismissal of defective application tentatively selected in a point hearing, and staff award of permit on a non-comparative basis to only remaining acceptable applicant). See generally NCE Omnibus, 22 FCC Rcd at 6162 n.230 (2007) (standards for staff evaluation of petitions). See 5 U.S.C. �� 702, 704, 706; 47 U.S.C. �� 309(d), 402(b), 405; 47 C.F.R. �� 1.106-08, 1.120, 73.7004. In cases that involve separate mutually exclusive groups but present common issues, the petitions or appeals may be filed jointly or may be consolidated at the discretion of the Commission or a reviewing court. See, e.g., FED. R. APP. P. 3(b). The ``no'' designation is used when applicants propose to serve different communities, but each certifies that it would
• http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/OGC/Orders/1998/fcc98056.pdf http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/OGC/Orders/1998/fcc98056.wp
  • Commission regulation and the document is in fact served by mail (see � 1.47(f)), and the filing period for a response is 10 days or less, an additional 3 days (excluding holidays) will be allowed to all parties in the proceeding for filing a response. This paragraph (� 1.4(h)) shall not apply to documents filed pursuant to � 1.89, � 1.120(d), � 1.315(b) or � 1.316. For purposes of this paragraph service by facsimile or by electronic means shall be deemed equivalent to hand delivery. 6. Section 1.46 is amended by revising paragraphs (b) and (c) to read as follows: � 1.46 Motions for extension of time. * * * * * (b) Motions for extension of time in which to
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/16/releases/da981138.pdf http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/16/releases/da981138.txt http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/16/releases/da981138.wp
  • prime interest to Nextel, and, in Federal Communications Commission DA 98-1138 32 Id. at 9. 33 See 47 C.F.R. � 1.2105(c); see also Mercury PCS I, 12 FCC Rcd. 17970 (WTB, 1997) (Mercury) (winning bidder in PCS auction assessed fine for bid signaling strategies). Nextel Opposition at 10. 34 35 Id. 36 See para. 3, supra. 37 47 C.F.R. � 1.120(c). See CMRS Second Report and Order, 9 FCC Rcd. 2348, 2386-87 (1994) (anti-collusion rule adopted). 38 39 See Mercury, 12 FCC Rcd. at 17977 at n.31. 40 Id. at n.30. 41 Id. at n.32. 5 exchange, Nextel would yield certain A block licenses to competing bidders. IE cites Nextel's conduct in the 32 Reno EA as illustrative of its allegations.
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/commoperators/element6.doc
  • water D.None of the above 6A294 C An Edison storage battery should not be charged at less than the manufacturer's specified rate: A.In order that the capacity of the battery shall be maximum after charge B.The chemical reactions of the Edison-type cell C.A & B D.None of the above 6A295 D Your emergency battery has a specific gravity reading of 1.120. What should be done? A.Place the battery on charge at once B.Bring the electrolyte level to about 1/4 inch above the top of the plates C.The battery will be fully charged when the specific gravity reads 1.280 to 1.300 D.All of the above 6A296 A What care should be taken with selecting water to add to a storage cell? A.It
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Cable/Orders/2000/da002228.doc
  • refund amount that differs from the calculation prescribed in the Refund Order. Operator did not file a petition for reconsideration or an application for review of the Refund Order. Consequently, Operator is attempting to raise in its refund plan an issue that it failed to properly place before the Commission in accordance with the Commission's rules. See Sections 1.101 - 1.120 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.101 - 1.120. A refund plan is not a substitute for the reconsideration and review process and issues raised in refund plans will not be considered. See also, In the Matter of Marcus Cable Associates, L.P., 12 FCC Rcd 19526 (1997). Federal Communications Commission DA 00-2228 Federal Communications Commission DA 00-2228 a b
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Cable/Orders/2000/da002388.doc
  • cable programming service tier ("CPST") subscribers for the period stated in the Refund Order and file a report with the Chief, Cable Services Bureau, stating the cumulative refund amount determined (including franchise fees and interest), describing the calculation thereof, and describing its plan to implement the refund within 60 days of Commission approval of the plan. See Sections 1.101 - 1.120 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.101 - 1.120. See also, In the Matter of Marcus Cable Associates, L.P., 12 FCC Rcd 19526 (1997). See In the Matter of Cencom Cable Income Partners II, LP, 12 FCC Rcd 7948 (1997). 8 FCC Rcd 5631 (1993). Cencom at � 22 (footnote omitted). We calculated a principal amount of $3,145.70 for
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Intl/4361-98.pdf
  • 9.0 0.0 9,407,23425.7 0.618.717.038.1 Israel $175,485,42957.1 0.424.716.5 1.2 $51,101,33253.2 0.024.022.3 0.4 $2,877,38878.4 0.014.3 6.3 1.1 393,264,98149.0 1.222.524.5 2.8 Jordan $40,585,75448.7 1.523.2 9.217.5 $4,820,44945.6 0.036.115.1 3.1 $599,11341.3 0.022.423.812.5 58,412,78535.9 3.126.311.623.1 Kuwait $53,219,05461.8 0.617.818.1 1.7 $6,765,93025.3 0.037.936.2 0.6 $11,962,07791.7 0.0 4.6 3.6 0.1 59,485,65749.3 0.924.523.0 2.3 Lebanon $51,341,29746.0 3.111.7 7.431.7 $5,989,54729.8 0.047.8 0.022.4 $3,407,20560.3 0.036.4 0.0 3.4 68,918,36725.5 4.112.7 7.250.5 Oman $6,450,78955.5 1.120.415.1 7.9 $1,813,28569.4 0.019.010.7 0.9 $1,057,69775.7 0.012.511.9 0.0 7,791,56052.6 1.323.114.7 8.3 Qatar $6,492,02065.1 0.520.6 9.2 4.7 $3,341,50654.0 0.037.2 8.8 0.0 $2,793,50912.9 0.018.768.4 0.0 9,268,09058.8 0.625.5 9.2 5.8 Saudi Arabia $115,692,73267.2 0.612.3 9.010.8 $35,610,07229.1 0.048.920.4 1.7 $6,865,38678.7 0.019.5 1.8 0.0 156,537,94550.2 0.823.110.915.0 Syria $16,282,54052.1 2.924.3 6.314.4 $3,161,32633.8 0.023.428.114.7 $2,296,07175.1 0.010.5 3.411.1 20,353,01430.3 4.213.8 8.543.2 United Arab Emirates $50,402,82960.5 0.820.8 8.9 9.0 $26,781,98135.0
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/OGC/Orders/1998/fcc98056.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/OGC/Orders/1998/fcc98056.wp
  • Commission regulation and the document is in fact served by mail (see � 1.47(f)), and the filing period for a response is 10 days or less, an additional 3 days (excluding holidays) will be allowed to all parties in the proceeding for filing a response. This paragraph (� 1.4(h)) shall not apply to documents filed pursuant to � 1.89, � 1.120(d), � 1.315(b) or � 1.316. For purposes of this paragraph service by facsimile or by electronic means shall be deemed equivalent to hand delivery. 6. Section 1.46 is amended by revising paragraphs (b) and (c) to read as follows: � 1.46 Motions for extension of time. * * * * * (b) Motions for extension of time in which to
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-08-1467A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-08-1467A1.pdf
  • a petition for reconsideration requesting reinstatement nunc pro tunc within 30 days, provided that the amendment is minor and does not alter the fair distribution preference. See 47 C.F.R. � 73.3522(b)(1). A tentative selectee that is unable to cure the defect is disqualified. See 5 U.S.C. �� 702, 704, 706; 47 U.S.C. �� 309(d), 402(b), 405; 47 C.F.R. �� 1.106-08, 1.120, 73.7004. In cases that involve separate mutually exclusive groups but present common issues, the petitions or appeals may be filed jointly or may be consolidated at the discretion of the Commission or the court. See, e.g., FED. R. APP. P. 3(b). Federal Communications Commission DA 08-1467 Federal Communications Commission DA 08-1467 � tm � � � Y ] � �
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-09-2172A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-09-2172A1.pdf
  • tunc within 30 days. The amendment must be minor and may not alter the fair distribution preference. See 47 C.F.R. � 73.3522(b)(1). The staff will not reinstate the application of a tentative selectee that is unable to cure all defects. See 5 U.S.C. �� 702, 704, and 706; 47 U.S.C. �� 309(d), 402(b), and 405; 47 C.F.R. �� 1.106-08, 1.115, 1.120, and 73.7004. In cases that involve separate mutually exclusive groups but present common issues, the petitions or appeals may be filed jointly or may be consolidated at the discretion of the Commission or the court. See, e.g., FED. R. APP. P. 3(b). Federal Communications Commission DA 09-2172 Federal Communications Commission DA 09-2172 . / � � � � � �
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-09-2596A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-09-2596A1.pdf
  • tunc within 30 days. The amendment must be minor and may not alter the fair distribution preference. See 47 C.F.R. � 73.3522(b)(1). The staff will not reinstate the application of a tentative selectee that is unable to cure all defects. See 5 U.S.C. �� 702, 704, and 706; 47 U.S.C. �� 309(d), 402(b), and 405; 47 C.F.R. �� 1.106-08, 1.115, 1.120, and 73.7004. In cases that involve separate mutually exclusive groups but present common issues, the petitions or appeals may be filed jointly or may be consolidated at the discretion of the Commission or the court. See, e.g., FED. R. APP. P. 3(b). Federal Communications Commission DA 09-2596 Federal Communications Commission DA 09-2596 - � � � � � � (R)
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-09-735A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-09-735A1.pdf
  • tunc within 30 days. The amendment must be minor and may not alter the fair distribution preference. See 47 C.F.R. � 73.3522(b)(1). The staff will not reinstate the application of a tentative selectee that is unable to cure all defects. See 5 U.S.C. �� 702, 704, and 706; 47 U.S.C. �� 309(d), 402(b), and 405; 47 C.F.R. �� 1.106-08, 1.115, 1.120, and 73.7004. In cases that involve separate mutually exclusive groups but present common issues, the petitions or appeals may be filed jointly or may be consolidated at the discretion of the Commission or the court. See, e.g., FED. R. APP. P. 3(b). Federal Communications Commission DA 09-735 Federal Communications Commission DA 09-735 ... � � � � � � �
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/FCC-07-40A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/FCC-07-40A1.pdf
  • finds a new or novel question; or (3) finds a substantial and material question of fact). The Commission or Administrative Law Judge would then resolve new and novel or substantial and material factual matters and, if necessary, conduct a new comparative point hearing. See 5 U.S.C. �� 702, 704, 706; 47 U.S.C. �� 309(d), 402(b), 405; 47 C.F.R. �� 1.106-08, 1.120, 73.7004. In cases that involve separate mutually exclusive groups but present common issues, the petitions or appeals may be filed jointly or may be consolidated at the discretion of the Commission or the court. See, e.g., FED. R. APP. P. 3(b). 47 C.F.R. � 73.3004. The ``no'' designation is used when applicants propose to serve different communities, but each certifies