FCC Web Documents citing 1.1102

as compiled by hallikainen.com/FccRules on 2012 07 01

• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-56A4.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-56A4.pdf http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-56A4.txt
  • amended as follows: PART 1 - PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE 1. The authority citation for Part 1 continues to read: Authority: 47 U.S.C. 151, 154(i), 154(j), 155, 225, 303(R), 309 and 325(e). 2. Section 1.933(c) is amended to add subparagraphs (8) and (9) as follows: * * * * * (8) Multipoint Distribution Service. (9) Instructional Television Fixed Service. 3. Section 1.1102 is amended by amending paragraph 20 to read as follows: 20. Multipoint Distribution Service (including Multi-channel MDS) a. New Station 601 & 159 220.00 CJM Federal Communications Commission, Wireless Bureau Applications, P.O. Box 358155, Pittsburgh, PA 15251-5155. b. Major Modification of License 601 &159 220.00CJM Federal Communications Commission, Wireless Bureau Applications, P.O. Box 358994, Pittsburgh, PA 15251-5155. c. Certification of
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-95A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-95A1.pdf http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-95A1.txt
  • data points for each radial should be used in the computation. (b) Average terrain elevation is the average of the eight radial average terrain elevations (for the eight cardinal radials). (c) For locations in Dade and Broward Counties, Florida, the method prescribed above may be used or average terrain elevation may be assumed to be 3 meters (10 feet). Section 1.1102(16)(h) is removed. Section 1.2003 is amended by deleting the phrase ``FCC 409 Airborne Mobile Radio Telephone License Application;'' Title 47, Part 22 of the Code of Federal Regulations, 47 CFR Part 22, is amended as follows: The authority citation for Part 22 continues to read as follows: Authority: 47 U.S.C. 154, 222, 303, 309 and 332. Section 22.1(b) is amended
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-1134A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-1134A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-1134A1.txt
  • Flex R&O). 63 Fed. Reg. 59656 (Nov. 3, 1999). 47 C.F.R. �� 1.949(a), 1.955(a)(1). 47 C.F.R. � 1.925(b)(3). Waiver Request at 1-2. Id. Waiver Order, 14 FCC Rcd at 5194. 218-219 MHz Flex R&O, 15 FCC Rcd at 1517 � 32. See Waiver Request at 1-2. Daniel Goodman, Receiver, Dr. Robert Chan, Petition for Waiver of Sections 90.633 (c) and 1.1102 of the Commission's Rules, Memorandum Opinion & Order and Order on Reconsideration, 13 FCC Rcd 21944, 21973 (1998). See Waiver Order, 14 FCC Rcd at 5190, n.3. See Medina Electric Cooperative, Inc., Order on Reconsideration, DA 99-2314, � 6 (WTB PSPWD rel. Oct. 26, 1999) (granting reinstatement of a 2 GHz license erroneously cancelled by licensee, in part because the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-1188A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-1188A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-1188A1.txt
  • of each licensee to renew its license prior to the license's expiration date. ULS MO&O, 14 FCC Rcd at 11155 � 21. Accordingly, ``failure of a licensee to receive a [renewal form] from the Commission is no excuse for failure to file a renewal application.'' See Daniel R. Goodman, Receiver, Dr. Robert Chan, Petition for Waiver of Sections 90.633(c) and 1.1102 of the Commission's Rules, Memorandum Opinion and Order on Reconsideration, 13 FCC Rcd 21944, 21972-73 � 53 (1998); accord, e.g., Nevada Power Company, Order on Reconsideration, DA 99-2291 at � 5 (WTB PSPWD rel. Oct. 25, 1999). Federal Communications Commission DA 00-1188 Federal Communications Commission DA 00-1188 � � @& �0� �0� �0� �0� �0� �0� �0� �`� �0� ~
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-1405A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-1405A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-1405A1.txt
  • and Rules Branch Commercial Wireless Division Wireless Telecommunications Bureau In 1995, the Commission released the Goodman/Chan Order, which, among other things, granted certain General Category Specialized Mobile Radio licensees an additional four months to construct and commence operations of their licenses. See In the Matter of Daniel R. Goodman, Receiver, Dr. Robert Chan, Petition for Waiver of Sections 90.633(c) and 1.1102 of the Commission's rules, Memorandum Opinion and Order, 10 FCC Rcd 8537, 8545 � 20 (1995). We note that none of the Reconsideration Letters specifies the Commission order or action that it is seeking to have reconsidered. It is not certain, therefore, that the Reconsideration Letters comply with section 1.106(f)'s mandate that petitions for reconsideration be filed within 30 days
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-1415A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-1415A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-1415A1.txt
  • and Rules Branch Commercial Wireless Division Wireless Telecommunications Bureau In 1995, the Commission released the Goodman/Chan Order, which, among other things, granted certain General Category Specialized Mobile Radio licensees an additional four months to construct and commence operations of their licenses. See In the Matter of Daniel R. Goodman, Receiver, Dr. Robert Chan, Petition for Waiver of Sections 90.633(c) and 1.1102 of the Commission's rules, Memorandum Opinion and Order, 10 FCC Rcd 8537, 8545 � 20 (1995). We note that none of the Reconsideration Letters specifies the Commission order or action that it is seeking to have reconsidered. It is not certain, therefore, that the Reconsideration Letters comply with section 1.106(f)'s mandate that petitions for reconsideration be filed within 30 days
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-1415A1_Erratum.doc
  • and Rules Branch Commercial Wireless Division Wireless Telecommunications Bureau In 1995, the Commission released the Goodman/Chan Order, which, among other things, granted certain General Category Specialized Mobile Radio licensees an additional four months to construct and commence operations of their licenses. See In the Matter of Daniel R. Goodman, Receiver, Dr. Robert Chan, Petition for Waiver of Sections 90.633(c) and 1.1102 of the Commission's rules, Memorandum Opinion and Order, 10 FCC Rcd 8537, 8545 � 20 (1995). We note that none of the Reconsideration Letters specifies the Commission order or action that it is seeking to have reconsidered. It is not certain, therefore, that the Reconsideration Letters comply with section 1.106(f)'s mandate that petitions for reconsideration be filed within 30 days
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-1416A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-1416A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-1416A1.txt
  • Kunze Deputy Chief, Commercial Wireless Division Wireless Telecommunications Bureau In 1995, the Commission released the Goodman/Chan Order, which, among other things, granted certain General Category Specialized Mobile Radio licensees an additional four months to construct and commence operations of their licenses. See In the Matter of Daniel R. Goodman, Receiver, Dr. Robert Chan, Petition for Waiver of Sections 90.633(c) and 1.1102 of the Commission's Rules, Memorandum Opinion and Order, 10 FCC Rcd 8537, 8545 � 20 (1995) (Goodman/Chan Order). See In re 929 MHz Paging Licenses, Motions for Reconsideration of Waiver Requests of Construction Period, Order on Reconsideration, 14 FCC Rcd 9738 (CWD 1999); In re 929 and 931 MHz Paging Licenses, Motions for Reconsideration of Waiver Requests of Construction Period,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-1416A1_Erratum.doc
  • Kunze Deputy Chief, Commercial Wireless Division Wireless Telecommunications Bureau In 1995, the Commission released the Goodman/Chan Order, which, among other things, granted certain General Category Specialized Mobile Radio licensees an additional four months to construct and commence operations of their licenses. See In the Matter of Daniel R. Goodman, Receiver, Dr. Robert Chan, Petition for Waiver of Sections 90.633(c) and 1.1102 of the Commission's Rules, Memorandum Opinion and Order, 10 FCC Rcd 8537, 8545 � 20 (1995) (Goodman/Chan Order). See In re 929 MHz Paging Licenses, Motions for Reconsideration of Waiver Requests of Construction Period, Order on Reconsideration, 14 FCC Rcd 9738 (CWD 1999); In re 929 and 931 MHz Paging Licenses, Motions for Reconsideration of Waiver Requests of Construction Period,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-150A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-150A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-150A1.txt
  • Petition at 2. Order at �� 11-12. Id. at � 9. Id. at � 8 (citing Fees II, 5 FCC Rcd at 5922-23 �� 25-26). DCT Communications. Inc. Contingent Reply to Opposition to Further Petition for Reconsideration (filed Sept. 26, 1999) (Reply). Further Petition at 3-4. Id. at 4-5. Id. at 5. Id. at 8. Id. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.1102 (1994) (FCC Form 159 not listed as required when filing FCC Form 494); 47 C.F.R. � 1.1108(b) (1994). Altron's arguments to the contrary mischaracterize DCT's position and therefore are without merit. Specifically, Altron states that ``DCT does not dispute that the remittance advice form was still required at the time that DCT filed its application.'' Opposition at 7. As noted
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-1849A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-1849A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-1849A1.txt
  • Because electronic filing provides for on-line checking of applications, electronic filers are more likely to detect and correct errors before submitting applications, and therefore reduce the risk that their applications will be returned or dismissed. For this reason, the Bureau strongly encourages applicants to choose electronic filing. Application Fees Applicants using ULS remain subject to existing application fees under Section 1.1102 of the rules, 47 CFR � 1.1102. ULS, however, will simplify the process of submitting fees to the Commission. When an applicant submits an application electronically, ULS will assign a file number and show the correct fee amount due and the payment type code on a confirmation screen. Clicking on the ``Form 159'' button will pre-fill this information on the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-1992A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-1992A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-1992A1.txt
  • 902-928 MHz Location Wideband (Grandfathered AVM) that were previously licensed as Land Mobile Radiolocation (RS) as follows: Former Radio Service Code Description New Radio Service Code Description RS Land Mobile Radiolocation RS Land Mobile Radiolocation LN 902-928 MHz Location Narrowband (Non-Multilateration) LW 902-928 MHz Location Wideband (Grandfathered AVM) Application Fees Applicants using ULS remain subject to application fees under Section 1.1102 of the rules, 47 CFR � 1.1102. ULS, however, will simplify the process of submitting fees to the Commission. When an applicant submits an application electronically, ULS will assign a file number and show the correct fee amount due and the payment type code on a confirmation screen. Clicking on the ``Form 159'' button will display an FCC 159 Form
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2091A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2091A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2091A1.txt
  • 27, 1999). This application included a request for a waiver of Section 101.65 of the Commission's Rules to allow submission of the renewal application thirty days beyond the expiration date of the license. See 47 C.F.R. � 101.65 (1998). Specifically, the applications were addressed to the lockbox that accepts, inter alia, microwave renewal applications, lockbox 358245. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.1102(14). The applications included waiver requests, so WSYX used fee type code PDWM, the code for the waiver fees. See id. Fees bearing code PDWM, however, must be submitted to lockbox 358130, the lockbox for, inter alia, microwave waiver requests, and are not accepted at lockbox 358245. See id. See Public Notice, Report No. 401 (rel. Dec. 15, 1999). See Biennial
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2292A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2292A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2292A1.txt
  • applications using ULS. The FCC will input these applicants' Form 900 Renewal Application into ULS within a few days after implementation of the Phase II Services. Beginning October 24, 2000, Electronic Form 900 software can no longer be used by applicants to file renewals for Phase II services. Application Fees Applicants using ULS remain subject to application fees under Section 1.1102 of the rules, 47 CFR � 1.1102. ULS, however, will simplify the process of submitting fees to the FCC. When applicants submit an application electronically, ULS will assign a file number and show the correct fee amount due and the payment type code on a confirmation screen. Clicking on the ``Form 159'' button will display an FCC 159 Form with
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2312A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2312A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2312A1.txt
  • FCC Rcd 21027, 21071 � 96 (1998). Thus, contrary to FNB's contention, the renewal application deadline does not ``presume the receipt of a renewal notice.'' See Petition at 5. See, e.g., Tampa Electric Company, Order, 14 FCC Rcd 21344, 21348 � 9 (WTB PSPWD 1999). See Daniel R. Goodman, Receiver, Dr. Robert Chan, Petition for Waiver of Sections 90.633(c) and 1.1102 of the Commission's Rules, Memorandum Opinion and Order on Reconsideration, 13 FCC Rcd 21944, 21972-73 � 53 (1998); accord, e.g., WSYX Licensee, Inc., Order, DA 00-2091, � 5 (WTB PSPWD rel. Sept. 22, 2000); Nevada Power Company, Order on Reconsideration, 14 FCC Rcd 17812, 17814 � 5 (WTB PSPWD 1999). See 47 C.F.R. � 101.103. See 47 C.F.R. � 101.31(b)
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2439A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2439A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2439A1.txt
  • use the most current edition of this form, which is October 1997. Use of this form for Ship applications is permitted only until May 20, 2001. Any pre-ULS form or letter request submitted after May 20, 2001, for this service will be dismissed without prejudice. Application Fees Applicants using ULS to file electronically remain subject to application fees under Section 1.1102 of the rules, Section 47 CFR � 1.1102. ULS, however, will simplify the process of submitting fees to the FCC and greatly reduce the potential for applicants to submit insufficient fees. When applicants submit their application online, ULS will assign a file number and show the correct fee amount due and the payment type code on a confirmation screen. Clicking
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2564A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2564A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2564A1.txt
  • applications using ULS. The FCC will input these applicants' Form 900 Renewal Application into ULS within a few days after implementation of the Phase III Services. Beginning December 4, 2000, Electronic Form 900 software can no longer be used by applicants to file renewals for Phase III services. Application Fees Applicants using ULS remain subject to application fees under Section 1.1102 of the rules, 47 CFR � 1.1102. ULS, however, will simplify the process of submitting fees to the FCC. When applicants submit an application electronically, ULS will assign a file number and show the correct fee amount due and the payment type code on a confirmation screen. Selecting the ``Form 159'' button will display an FCC 159 Form with pre-filled
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-270A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-270A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-270A1.txt
  • each FCC Form 610B you submit. Applications that do not include this additional information are subject to dismissal. Once you have received your Club call sign, you may apply online for a Club vanity call sign. Application Fees (Vanity Call Sign applications) Amateur Service applicants filing vanity call sign applications in ULS remain subject to existing application fees under Section 1.1102 of the rules, 47 CFR �1.1102. ULS, however, will simplify the process of submitting fees to the Commission. When an applicant submits an application electronically, ULS will assign a file number and show the fee amount due and the payment type code on a confirmation screen. Where to Send Payments for Electronically-filed Applications Filers are urged to make payments electronically.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-333A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-333A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-333A1.txt
  • Market 354(B)(2), while Saguache Partnership is the licensee of Market 354(B)(1). 47 C.F.R. � 22.912(b), (c). Emergency Request to Rescind Order, filed by Colorado RSA 7(B)(2) Limited Partnership on September 11, 1998 (Emergency Request). We consider this Emergency Request to be a Petition for Reconsideration. See Daniel R. Goodman, Receiver, Dr. Robert Chan Petition for Waiver of Sections 90.633(c) and 1.1102 of the Commission's Rules, Memorandum Opinion and Order on Reconsideration, FCC 98-167, � 26 (July 31, 1998). In addition, the Petition for Reconsideration and Request for Referral to the Commissioners for Treatment as an Application for Review and Request for Expedited Consideration filed on Octover 5, 1998 by Colorado 7 - Saguache Limited Partnership and the Petition for Reconsideration or,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-48A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-48A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-48A1.txt
  • Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C. 20554 In the Matter of ) ) George L. Fetrow ) ) Gary Dykhouse ) ) Request for Waiver of Section 1.1102 ) of the Commission's Rules ) ORDER Adopted: January 11, 2000 Released: January 12, 2000 By the Deputy Chief, Policy and Rules Branch, Commercial Wireless Division, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau: . By this Order, we dismiss as moot the requests for a fee waiver filed respectively by George L. Fetrow and Gary Dykhouse (Petitioners) on December 15, 1998 in connection with
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-786A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-786A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-786A1.txt
  • 1. Effective November 1, 1999, the Branch granted Compton's request to extend the STA until May 1, 2000. Kay Petition for Reconsideration. 47 C.F.R. � 1.106(b). San Luis Obispo Limited Partnership, Memorandum Opinion and Order and Forfeiture Order, 11 FCC Rcd 9616, 9617 � 4 (1996). Daniel R. Goodman, Receiver; Dr. Robert Chan, Petition for Waiver of Sections 90.633(c) and 1.1102 of the Commission's Rules, Order on Reconsideration, 14 FCC Rcd 20547, 20549 � 4 (1999). See also Application of MCI Communications Corp. and Southern Pacific Telecommunications Corp., Memorandum Opinion and Order, 12 FCC Rcd 7790, 7794 � 11 (1997), aff'd sub nom Microwave Acquisition Corp. v. FCC, 145 F.3d 1410 (D.C. Cir. 1998); Friends of the Earth, Inc. v. Laidlaw
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-825A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-825A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-825A1.txt
  • � 1.106, the Petition for Reconsideration filed by DCT Communications, Inc. on November 22, 1999 IS DENIED. This action is taken under delegated authority pursuant to Sections 0.131 and 0.331 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.131, 0.331. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Ramona E. Melson Deputy Chief, Public Safety and Private Wireless Division Wireless Telecommunications Bureau See 47 C.F.R. � 1.1102 (1994) (FCC Form 159 is not listed as required when filing FCC Form 494); 47 C.F.R. � 1.108(b) (1994). Altron Communications, L.C., Order on Reconsideration, DA 00-150 (PS&PWD 2000) See Amendment of the Commission's Rules Regarding the 37.0-38.6 GHz and 38.6-40.0 GHz Bands, Report and Order and Second Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, ET Docket No. 95-183, 12 FCC Rcd 18600,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1342A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1342A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1342A1.txt
  • 1999), Attachment F, � 18 (1999 Regulatory Fee Order).] Cosmos Broadcasting Corporation - Request for refund of filing fees on behalf of Cosmos Broadcasting Corporation, licensee of TV STL KIX-79 and TV Intercity Relays WHS-271 and WLD-547. Denied (February 5, 2001). [See Streamlining the Commission's Antenna Structure Clearance Procedure, FCC 00-76, � 8, n.39 (Mar. 8, 2000). See 47 C.F.R. �1.1102(41)(a).] Daniels, Thomas B. - WJNI(FM) - Request for verification of the correctness of FY 1999 regulatory fees for WJNI(FM). Responded (February 7, 2001). Davis, Lester L. - Request for refund of a filing fee submitted in connection with an application for Amateur Radio vanity call letters. Granted (March 7, 2001). [See 47 C.F.R. �1.1102. See 47 C.F.R. �1.1152, Note 1.]
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1904A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1904A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1904A1.txt
  • application, the Commission takes into consideration all of the facts and circumstances, including the length of the delay in filing, the reasons for the failure to timely file, the potential consequences to the public if the license should terminate, and the performance record of the licensee. See Daniel Goodman, Receiver, Dr. Robert Chan, Petition for Waiver of Sections 90.633(c) and 1.1102 of the Commission's Rules, Memorandum Opinion and Order on Reconsideration, 13 FCC Rcd 21,944, � 53 (1998) (holding that ``[i]t is the responsibility of each licensee to apply for renewal of its license prior to the expiration date of the license,'' and that ``failure of a licensee to receive a [renewal form] from the Commission is no excuse for failure
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2353A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2353A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2353A1.txt
  • application, San Francisco does not have a current pending renewal application for Station KIVD0012. A licensee is not excused from timely filing a renewal application because it has not received materials from the Commission. See, e.g., Self Order, 15 FCC Rcd at 18,663 � 6 citing Daniel Goodman, Receiver, Dr. Robert Chan, Petition for Waiver of Sections 90.633 (c) and 1.1102 of the Commission's Rules, Memorandum Opinion & Order and Order on Reconsideration, 13 FCC Rcd 21944, 21973 (1998). See Petition at 2-3. See, Order, Memorandum Opinion and Order and Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, Amendment of Part 95 of the Commission's Rules to Provide Regulatory Flexibility in the 218-219 MHz Service, � 36, WT Docket No. 98-169, 13 FCC Rcd 19064
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2586A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2586A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2586A1.txt
  • Outward Bound School - Request for waiver/exemption of filing fees. Denied (September 28, 2001) [See Establishment of a Fee Collection Program to Implement the Provisions of the Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1989, (Fees II Reconsideration), Par. 54, FCC 91-298] Pacific Gas and Electric Company - Request for waiver of application fees. Granted (October 1, 2001) [See 47 CFR Par. 1.1102 & 1.1117(e).] Paging Network, Inc. - Request for waiver of application fees. Granted (June 6, 2001) [See Implementation of Section 9 of the Communications Act Assessment and Collection of Regulatory Fees for the 1994 Fiscal Year, 10 FCC Rcd 12759, 12762 (1995).] Paging Network, Inc. - Request for waiver of the FY 2000 regulatory fees. Granted (June 6, 2001) [See
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2865A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2865A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2865A1.txt
  • Communications Equipment (June 5, 2000) (June 5, 2000 Letter). Letter from Terry L. Fishel, Deputy Chief, Licensing and Technical Analysis Branch, Commercial Wireless Division, to Richard Philip Hanno, Attorney for Communications Equipment (Aug. 25, 2000). 47 C.F.R. � 1.106(f). Id. � 1.106(i). In the Matter of Daniel R. Goodman, Receiver; Dr. Robert Chan, Petition for Waiver of Sections 90.633(c) and 1.1102 of the Commission's Rules, Memorandum Opinion and Order, 10 FCC Rcd 8537 (1995) (Goodman/Chan I); Memorandum Opinion and Order and Order on Reconsideration, 13 FCC Rcd 21,944 (1998) (Goodman/Chan II). See Commission Announces Construction Deadline for Goodman/Chan Receivership Licensees and Similarly Situated Non-Goodman/Chan General Category SMR Licenses, Public Notice, 13 FCC Rcd 20,734, 20,735 (1998). It is well settled that
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2935A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2935A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2935A1.txt
  • 1, 13, 22, 26, 27, 80, 87 90, 95, 97 and 101 of the Commission's Rules to Facilitate the Development and the Use of the Universal Licensing System in the Wireless Telecommunications Services, Report and Order, 13 FCC Rcd 21027, 21071 � 96 (1998). See, e.g., Daniel R. Goodman, Receiver, Dr. Robert Chan, Petition for Waiver of Sections 90.633(c) and 1.1102 of the Commission's Rules, Memorandum Opinion and Order on Reconsideration, 13 FCC Rcd 21944 (1998); First National Bank of Berryville, Order, 15 FCC Rcd 19693 (WTB PSPWD 2000). Waiver Request at 3 n.4, citing Self Communications, Inc., Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture, 15 FCC Rcd 18661 (WTB PSPWD 2000) (Self Communications); Telecellular, Order, 14 FCC Rcd 21107
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2976A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2976A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2976A1.txt
  • in the Wireless Telecommunications Services, Memorandum Opinion and Order on Reconsideration, WT Docket No. 98-20, 14 FCC Rcd 11476 (1999) (ULS Reconsideration MO&O). Id. at 11485 � 22. Id. at 11486 � 22. Id. at 11485 � 22. Public Notice, 15 FCC Rcd at 22013. See Daniel R. Goodman, Receiver, Dr. Robert Chan, Petition for Waiver of Sections 90.633(c) and 1.1102 of the Commission's Rules, Memorandum Opinion and Order on Reconsideration, 13 FCC Rcd 21944, 21972-73 � 53 (1998) (Goodman/Chan Order); accord, e.g., Nevada Power Company, Order on Reconsideration, 14 FCC Rcd 17812, 17813 � 5 (WTB PSPWD 1999). See, e.g., Goodman/Chan Order, 13 FCC Rcd at 21972-73 � 53; Mary Ann Salvatoriello, Memorandum Opinion and Order, 6 FCC Rcd 4705,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-3024A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-3024A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-3024A1.txt
  • 5-6. See id. See In re Application of Continental Satellite Corp., Memorandum Opinion and Order, 10 FCC Rcd 10473 (IB 1995). La Star, 9 FCC Rcd at 7108. Reply at 7. See Reply at 7-8. See In re Application of Continental Satellite Corp., Memorandum Opinion and Order, 10 FCC Rcd 10473 (IB 1995). We note that, as permitted by section 1.1102 (b) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.102 (b), we will make this Order effective as of the date of adoption, solely for the purpose of enabling the parties to complete certain transactions in connection with the Applications by the calendar year-end. We caution that we do not intend this action with respect to the effective date of this
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-465A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-465A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-465A1.txt
  • Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION 445 TWELFTH STREET, S.W.; TW-A325 WASHINGTON, D.C. 20554 News Media Information: (202) 418-0500 Fax-On-Demand: (202) 418-2830 Internet: http://www.fcc.gov ftp.fcc.gov DA - Released: September 9, 1999 CORRECTION TO REPORT & ORDER FCC 00-286 RELEASED AUGUST 4, 2000 Amendment of the Schedule of Application Fees Set Forth In Section 1.1102 of the Commission's Rules This public notice is to reflect corrections and further clarifications to the above schedule of application fees for the Wireless Telecommunications Bureau, which was published on August 4, 2000. The attached Schedule of Application Fees supersedes Section 1.1102 released on August 4, 2000. Questions concerning fees may be directed to the FCC's Consumer Center at 1-888-CALLFCC
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-465A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-465A2.txt
  • Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit 47 CFR Part 1 is amended as follows: Part 1 - Practice and Procedure 1. The authority citation for Part 1 continues to read as follows: Authority: 47 U.S.C. 154, 303, 503(b)(5); 5 U.S.C. 552 and 21 U.S.C. 853a, unless otherwise noted. 2. Section 1.1102 is revised to read as follows: $1.1102 Schedule of charges for applications and other filings in the wireless telecommunications services. Those services designated with an asterisk in the payment type code column have associated regulatory fees that must be paid at the same time the application fee is paid. Please refer to Section 1.1152 for the appropriate regulatory fee that
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-49A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-49A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-49A1.txt
  • Communications, Inc. - Request for waiver and refund of the filing fee on special temporary authority (STA) for Aquis Communications Inc. and SourceOne Wireless II, LLC. Denied. (November 21, 2000). [See Establishment of a Fee Collection Program to Implement the Provision of the Consolidated Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1985, 2 FCC Rcd 3558, 3572-73 (1990). See also, 47 CFR 1.1102 (45)(i) and 1.1117]. Beulah Chamber of Commerce - Request for waiver of FY 2000 regulatory fees for TV translator stations KO7EZ and KO9EZ at Beulah, ND. Granted. (December 18, 2000). [See Implementation of Section 9 of the Communications Act, FCC 95-257, 16, released June 22, 1995]. Chara Communications - Request for waiver of penalty for the late payment of regulatory
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-917A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-917A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-917A1.txt
  • implements the statutory directive in Section 405 of the Communications Act that limits standing to file a petition for reconsideration to ``any party [to the proceeding] or any other person aggrieved or whose interests are adversely affected thereby.'' 47 U.S.C. � 405(a). 47 C.F.R. � 1.106(b)(1). Daniel R. Goodman, Receiver; Dr. Robert Chan, Petition for Waiver of Sections 90.633(c) and 1.1102 of the Commission's Rules, Order on Reconsideration, 14 FCC Rcd 20547, 20549 � 4 (1999). Id., citing Duke Power Co. v. Carolina Environmental Study Group, 438 U.S. 59, 74 (1978). See also City of Compton Police Department, Order on Reconsideration, 15 FCC Rcd 16563 at 16566 � 8 (WTB PSPWD rel. April 7, 2000). This is the same test that
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-934A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-934A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-934A1.txt
  • Rules Branch Commercial Wireless Division Wireless Telecommunications Bureau The licenses at issue were canceled pursuant to In re Nathan Sherman Enterprises, Inc., Order on Reconsideration, DA 99-2705 (rel. Dec. 3, 1999), and removed from the Commission's license database on February 23, 2000. In the Matter of Daniel R. Goodman, Receiver; Dr. Robert Chan, Petition for Waiver of Sections 90.633(c) and 1.1102 of the Commission's Rules, Memorandum Opinion and Order, 10 FCC Rcd 8537 (1995) (Goodman/Chan Order). In the Matter of Daniel R. Goodman, Receiver; Dr. Robert Chan, Petition for Waiver of Sections 90.633(c) and 1.1102 of the Commission's Rules, Memorandum Opinion and Order and Order on Reconsideration, 13 FCC Rcd 21,944 (1998) (Goodman/Chan Reconsideration Order). See Attachment A. See Attachment B.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-942A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-942A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-942A1.txt
  • Petition for Correction of Database, Order, 14 FCC Rcd 18,710 (Policy & Rules Branch, CWD 1999). See Letter, Steven E. Weingarten, Chief, Commercial Wireless Division, to Russ Taylor, Esq., Gardner, Carton & Douglas, DA 98-2043, October 9, 1998 (attaching list) (``October Letter''). In the Matter of Daniel R. Goodman, Receiver; Dr. Robert Chan, Petition for Waiver of Sections 90.633(c) and 1.1102 of the Commission's Rules, Memorandum Opinion and Order and Order on Reconsideration, 13 FCC Rcd 21,944 (1998) (Goodman/Chan Reconsideration Order). In the Matter of Daniel R. Goodman, Receiver; Dr. Robert Chan, Petition for Waiver of Sections 90.633(c) and 1.1102 of the Commission's Rules, Memorandum Opinion and Order, 10 FCC Rcd 8537 (1995) (Goodman/Chan Order). See October Letter. See Attachment A.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-971A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-971A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-971A1.txt
  • letter 90 days before license expiration. This renewal reminder letter is provided as a courtesy, and failure to receive a reminder will not serve as a basis for reinstatement of an expired license. Applications for renewal may be filed no earlier than 90 days prior to expiration date. Application Fees Applicants using ULS remain subject to application fees under Section 1.1102 of the rules, 47 CFR � 1.1102. ULS, however, will simplify the process of submitting fees to the Commission. When an applicant submits an application electronically, ULS will assign a file number and show the correct fee amount due and the payment type code on a confirmation screen. Clicking on the ``Form 159'' button will display an FCC 159 Form
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-09A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-09A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-09A1.txt
  • FY 2001 regulatory fee Denied (November 27, 2001) [See Implementation of Section 9 of the Communications Act, 9 FCC Rcd 5333, 5344 (1994)] Infinity Communications Group, Inc. - Request for waiver of FY 2001 regulatory fee Denied (November 27, 2001) [See 47 CFR par. 1.1157 (c)] Page Mart II, Inc. - Request for waiver of FCC rules 47 CFR par. 1.1102 Filing fees Granted (November 28, 2001) [See Implementation of Section 9 of the Communications Act, 10 FCC Rcd 12759, 12762 (1995)] PNI Spectrum, LLC - Request for waiver of FY 2001 regulatory fee Granted (December 12, 2001) [See Implementation of Section 9 of the Communications Act, 10 FCC Rcd 12759, 12761-62 (1995)] Reams Communications Inc. - Request for waiver of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2513A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2513A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2513A1.txt
  • Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit DA 02-2513 October 4, 2002 FCC Suspends Collection of the July 2002 Amended Schedule of Application Fees; July 2000 Schedule of Application Fees Continues In Effect Until Further Notice By this Notice, we are suspending the collection of the increase in application fees set forth in Section 1.1102 through 1.1107 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.1102 - 1.1107, announced in the Commission's Order of July 12, 2002, GEN Docket No. 86-285, FCC 02-202. Filings requiring application fees should continue to tender the fees as set forth in the Schedule of Application Fees, GEN Docket No. 86-285, FCC 00-286 (2000), posted at , until further notice.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3560A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3560A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3560A1.txt
  • Id. at 7. Id. at 13. Id. at 14. Id. at 7. See Balanced Budget Act, section 3002(a), 47 U.S.C. � 309(j)(4)(F). See Part 1 Third Report and Order, 13 FCC Rcd 374, 455-456 � 141 (1997). Id. Id. Auction No. 48 Comment Public Notice at 8-9. Id. at 9. See Pacific Radio Comments at 2. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.1102. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.1107(c). Bids higher than the minimum acceptable bid would be calculated using the current percentage, even if the resulting increment is less than the absolute dollar amount imposed on the initial increment. Auction No. 48 Comment Public Notice at 10-11. Bidders must have sufficient eligibility to place a bid on the particular license. See Section III.D.3
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-894A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-894A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-894A1.txt
  • if the stations have been constructed, then the requested relief with respect to transfer of unconstructed stations is unnecessary. See para. 9. The Commission has stated the purpose of the prohibition against the transfer of unconstructed stations is to deter speculation and trafficking in licenses. See Daniel R. Goodman, Receiver: Dr. Robert Chan, Petition for Waiver of Sections 90.633(c) and 1.1102 of the Commission's Rules, Request for Waiver of Section 90.633(c) of the Commission's Rules by Various 800 MHz SMR Licensees, Request for Waiver of Section 90.609(b) of the Commission's Rules Prohibiting the Transfer and Assignment of Unconstructed Licenses, Request for Extension of License Term of 800 MHz Licensees, Memorandum Opinion and Order and Order on Reconsideration, 13 FCC Rcd 21944,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-174A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-174A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-174A1.txt
  • Petition at 6 n.9. See ULS MO&O, 14 FCC Rcd at 11,485 � 21. A licensee is not excused from timely filing a renewal application because it has not received materials from the Commission. See, e.g., Self Communications, 15 FCC Rcd at 18,663 � 6 citing Daniel Goodman, Receiver, Dr. Robert Chan, Petition for Waiver of Sections 90.633 (c) and 1.1102 of the Commission's Rules, Memorandum Opinion & Order and Order on Reconsideration, 13 FCC Rcd 21,944, 21,973 (1998) (Goodman). In this connection, we note that the Bureau reminded applicants filing applications in the Wireless Radio services after May 1, 1999 that they should examine their applications carefully prior to filing with the Bureau to prevent undesired results. See Unified Dismissal
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2793A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2793A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2793A1.txt
  • a consolidated response to Roman Catholic Diocese's petitions to deny (TVC Opposition to Roman Catholic Diocese). Grand Alliance Petition at 1. Roman Catholic Diocese Petition at 1-2. Id. Engineering Statement of Stephen Daugherty (Daugherty Statement). Roman Catholic Diocese Petition at 2. Grand Alliance Petition at 10-13. Daniel R. Goodman, Receiver; Dr. Robert Chan, Petition for Waiver of Sections 90.633(c) and 1.1102 of the Commission's Rules, Order on Reconsideration, 14 FCC Rcd 20547, 20549 � 4 (1999). WAIT Radio v. FCC, 418 F.2d 1153, 1157 (D.C. Cir. 1969) (citing Rio Grande Family Radio Fellowship, Inc. v. FCC, 406 F.2d 664 (D.C. Cir. 1968) (per curiam)). Waiver Request at 1. Id. See also Opposition at 7-8. Opposition at 8. Industrial Broadcasting Co. v.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-458A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-458A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-458A1.txt
  • Request. See Waiver Request; STA Request. Waiver Request. Id. See Waiver Request; STA Request. WAIT Radio v. FCC, 418 F.2d 1153, 1157 (D.C. Cir. 1969) (citing Rio Grande Family Radio Fellowship, Inc. v. FCC, 406 F.2d 664 (D.C. Cir. 1968) (per curiam)). Waiver Request. See, e.g., Daniel R. Goodman, Receiver, Dr. Robert Chan, Petition for Waiver of Sections 90.633(c) and 1.1102 of the Commission's Rules, Memorandum Opinion and Order on Reconsideration, 13 FCC Rcd 21944 (1998); First National Bank of Berryville, Order, 15 FCC Rcd 19693 (WTB PSPWD 2000). Pursuant to Section 74.15(e) of the Commission's Rules, an ITFS licensee must file a renewal application ``not later than the first day of the fourth calendar month prior to the expiration date
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-466A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-466A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-466A1.txt
  • WHNY Radio - Request for a waiver of the regulatory fee for FY 2002 Dismissed (January 8, 2003) [See Implementation of Section 9 of the Communications Act, 9 FCC Rcd 5333, 5346 (1994), recon. granted, 10 FCC Rcd 12759 (1995)] William J Warwick - Request for waiver of the duplicate license fee Granted (January 10, 2003) [See 47 CFR � 1.1102 (3) (c) and 47 CFR � 1.1117 (a)] WorldCom, Inc. - Request for a waiver and deferral of payment of application filing fees related to multiple applications for transfer of control of licenses by WorldCom, Inc., and its operating subsidiaries to debtor-in-possession successor entities Granted (December 19, 2002) [See Mobilemedia Corporation, et al., Memorandum Opinion and Order, 14 FCC Rcd.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-812A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-812A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-812A1.txt
  • March 18, 2003, for Ship Exemptions, manual filers who choose to use pre-ULS Form 820 must use the most current edition of this form, which is dated November 2001. Any pre-ULS form submitted after September 18, 2003, for this service will be dismissed without prejudice. Fees Applicants using ULS to file electronically remain subject to application (waiver) fees under Section 1.1102 of the rules, Section 47 CFR � 1.1102. ULS, however, simplifies the process of submitting fees to the FCC and greatly reduces the potential for applicants to submit insufficient fees. When applicants submit their application online, ULS will assign a file number and show the correct fee amount due and the payment type code on a confirmation screen. Clicking on
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1493A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1493A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1493A1.txt
  • the Interim Process Notice: New fee rates will be effective August 10, 2004. For filings on or after August 10, 2004, applicants and licensees must check the Wireless Telecommunications Bureau Fee Guide for the current fees. The 70-80-90 GHz bands are licensed for microwave point-to-point operations (common carrier or private operational fixed) which are subject to filing fees under Section 1.1102 and regulatory fees under Sections 1.1152 or 1.1154, as applicable. Certain applicants are exempt from filing and/or regulatory fees. Nonexempt applicants for new, non-exclusive nationwide licenses will be subject to microwave service filing and regulatory fees as follows: New license applications must use fee type code CJPR. Currently, the combined fee is $470. Modification of license applications must use fee
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1493A1_Erratum.doc
  • the Interim Process Notice: New fee rates will be effective August 10, 2004. For filings on or after August 10, 2004, applicants and licensees must check the Wireless Telecommunications Bureau Fee Guide for the current fees. The 70-80-90 GHz bands are licensed for microwave point-to-point operations (common carrier or private operational fixed) which are subject to filing fees under Section 1.1102 and regulatory fees under Sections 1.1152 or 1.1154, as applicable. Certain applicants are exempt from filing and/or regulatory fees. Nonexempt applicants for new, non-exclusive nationwide licenses will be subject to microwave service filing and regulatory fees as follows: New license applications must use fee type code CJPR. Currently, the combined fee is $470. Modification of license applications must use fee
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3165A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3165A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3165A1.txt
  • amended. Transfer and Assignment of Registered Transmitter Locations Transfer or assignment of a geographic area license, will include all locations registered under that call sign. Currently, partial assignment of individual location registration is not possible on ULS. FILING AND REGULATORY FEES The DSRC Service, which is licensed under Part 90 of the Commission's Rules, requires filing fees pursuant to Section 1.1102 of the Commission's Rules and regulatory fees pursuant to Section 1.1152 of the Commission's Rules. However, certain applicants are exempt from filing and/or regulatory fees. Nonexempt applicants for new, geographic area licenses must use the following filing and regulatory fees codes: New geographic area license applications: fee type code PALR. Modification of geographic area license applications: fee type code PALM.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3196A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3196A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3196A1.txt
  • 14 FCC Rcd 11476, 11486 � 22 (1999) (ULS MO&O). See id. at 11486 � 22. See id. at 11485 � 22. Order, 18 FCC Rcd at 2449 � 4, citing WAIT Radio v. FCC, 418 F.2d 1153, 1157 (D.C. Cir. 1969) (WAIT Radio). See, e.g., Daniel R. Goodman, Receiver, Dr. Robert Chan, Petition for Waiver of Sections 90.633(c) and 1.1102 of the Commission's Rules, Memorandum Opinion and Order on Reconsideration, 13 FCC Rcd 21944 (1998); First National Bank of Berryville, Order, 15 FCC Rcd 19693 (WTB PSPWD 2000). 47 C.F.R. � 1.106(c)(2). See Application for Renewal of ITFS Station WHR779, File No. BRIF-19980109DH. See Application for Renewal of ITFS Station WHR881, File No. BRIF-20010622AAA. See East River Electric Power Cooperative,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3985A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3985A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3985A1.txt
  • 6. All population figures are from the 2000 U.S. Census, U.S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of the Census. See Census 2000 Summary File 1 (SF1) and July 3, 2001, News Releases covering the U.S. Virgin Islands, Guam, the Northern Mariana Islands, and American Samoa. Auction No. 59 Comment Public Notice at 7. AMDS Comments at 1-3. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.1102. Results are rounded using our standard rounding procedure: results above $10,000 are rounded to the nearest $1,000; results below $10,000 but above $1,000 are rounded to the nearest $100; and results below $1,000 are rounded to the nearest $10. Auction No. 59 Comment Public Notice at 8. Bidders must have sufficient eligibility to place a bid on the particular license.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1364A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1364A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1364A1.txt
  • new Section 22.807 in the General Aviation Air-Ground Station rules and deleted certain superfluous language that relates to the Rural Radiotelephone Service. Eliminated, by revising Sections 1.903(c) and 22.3(b), the requirement that an authorization be obtained to operate general aviation airborne mobile stations in the Air-Ground Radiotelephone Service. Eliminated FCC Form 409 and deleted references to that form in Sections 1.1102 and 1.2003 of rules. Idle Tone The FCC eliminated the requirement that the Air-ground Radiotelephone Automated Service (AGRAS) systems transmit an idle tone. The deletion of Section 22.811 from the rules, however, in no way prohibits carriers from employing an idle tone if they choose to do so. Thus, to the extent that idle tone transmissions are deemed valuable by
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1524A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1524A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1524A1.txt
  • carriers and affiliates as required by part 43. Need: These rules provide a filing requirement to the Commission per part 43 of the Commission's rules. Legal Basis: 47 U.S.C. 154, 303. Section Number and Title: 1.785 (a) Annual financial reports. SUBPART G -- SCHEDULE OF STATUTORY CHARGES AND PROCEDURES FOR PAYMENT Brief Description: Schedule of charges for applications. Need: Section 1.1102 through 1.1107 rules are tables that identify the application fees that are charged by the Commission for renewing, modifying, or when applying for a new license. These fees are adjusted periodically to incorporate cost-of-living increases, and or other increases in fees. Section 1.1108 through 1.1119 rules describe the type and form of payment, where it should be sent and how
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1863A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1863A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1863A1.txt
  • for submitting the correct information to comply with requirements for the licensing of undersea cable landing stations. Legal Basis: 47 U.S.C. 34-39 and Executive Order No. 10530, dated May 10, 1954. Section Number and Title: 1.767(e), (f) Cable landing licenses. SUBPART G - SCHEDULE OF STATUTORY CHARGES AND PROCEDURES FOR PAYMENT Brief Description: Schedule of charges for applications. Need: Section 1.1102 through 1.1107 rules are tables that identify the application fees that are charged by the Commission for renewing, modifying, or when applying for a new license. These fees are adjusted periodically to incorporate cost-of-living increases, and or other increases in fees. Section 1.1108 through 1.1118 rules describe the type and form of payment, where it should be sent and how
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1631A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1631A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1631A1.txt
  • 20 calendar days of the mailing of this Hearing Designation Order, a written appearance stating that it will appear on the date fixed for hearing and present evidence on the issues specified in the Hearing Designation Order. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to Section 1.221(f), 47 C.F.R. � 1.221(f), that Sprint Nextel SHALL FILE the hearing fee specified in Section 1.1102(11) of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.1102(11), with its written appearance. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to Section 1.1114(f) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.1114(f), that the City of Boston IS EXEMPT from filing, and need not file, in connection with this hearing proceeding, a hearing fee with its written appearance. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-205A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-205A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-205A1.txt
  • the Wireless Telecommunications Service, Memorandum Opinion and Order on Reconsideration, WT Docket No. 98-20, 14 FCC Rcd 11476, 11486 � 22 (1999) (ULS MO&O). See id, 14 FCC Rcd. at 11486 � 22. See id., 14 FCC Rcd at 11485 � 22. 47 C.F.R. � 1.925(b)(3). See Daniel Goodman, Receiver, Dr. Robert Chan, Petition for Waiver of Sections 90.633(c) and 1.1102 of the Commission's Rules, Memorandum Opinion and Order on Reconsideration, 13 FCC Rcd 21944, 21972-21973 � 53 (1998) (holding that "[i]t is the responsibility of each licensee to apply for renewal of its license prior to the expiration date of the license," and that "failure of a licensee to receive a [renewal form] from the Commission is no excuse for
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4605A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4605A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4605A1.txt
  • each pending registration that is to be amended. Filing AND REGulatory FEES The 3650 MHz band is licensed as a land mobile service, under Part 90 of the FCC's Rules, for non-exclusive wireless operations on a Commercial Mobile Radio Service (CMRS) basis and/or on a Private Mobile Radio Service (PMRS) basis. Such applications are subject to filing fees under Section 1.1102 and regulatory fees under Section 1.1152. The Commission's rules exempt certain applicants from filing and/or regulatory fees. Listing the current fees in this public notice would disserve applicants because the Commission adjusts filing and regulatory fees periodically as required by several statutes. Applicants and licensees must check the Wireless Telecommunications Bureau Fee Filing Guide for current fees. Nonexempt applicants for
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-122A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-122A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-122A1.txt
  • and Radio Treaty Matters; General Rules and Regulations (47 C.F.R. Part 2), Tariffs (47 C.F.R. Part 61), Miscellaneous Rules Relating to Common Carriers (47 C.F.R. Part 64), Radio Broadcast Services (47 C.F.R. Part 73), and Stations in the Maritime Services (47 C.F.R. Part 80). Specifically, this Order corrects bank addresses in several provisions of Sections 0.401(b), 0.482, 1.80(h), 1.227(b), 1.907, 1.1102, 1.1103, 1.1104, 1.1105, 1.1106, 1.1107, 1.1152, 1.1153, 1.1154, 1.1155, 1.1156, 1.1166(d), 1.10001, 1.10009, 2.913(b), 61.14(b), 61.17(b), 61.20(b), 61.32(b), 61.153(b), 64.709(d), and 80.59(c) of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.401(b), 0.482, 1.80(h), 1.227(b), 1.907, 1.1102, 1.1103, 1.1104, 1.1105, 1.1106, 1.1107, 1.1152, 1.1153, 1.1154, 1.1155, 1.1156, 1.1166(d), 1.10001, 1.10009, 2.913(b), 61.14, 61.17, 61.20, 61.32, 61.153, 64.709, and 80.59(c). This Order also
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1331A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1331A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1331A1.txt
  • � 22 (1999). 47 C.F.R. � 1.925(b)(3). See BRS/EBS R&O & FNPRM, 19 FCC Rcd at 14248 � 217 (``As an initial matter, the Commission has stated that each licensee is fully responsible for knowing the term of its license and for filing a timely renewal application.''); Daniel Goodman, Receiver, Dr. Robert Chan, Petition for Waiver of Sections 90.633(c) and 1.1102 of the Commission's Rules, Memorandum Opinion and Order on Reconsideration, 13 FCC Rcd 21944, 21972-21973 � 53 (1998) (holding that "[i]t is the responsibility of each licensee to apply for renewal of its license prior to the expiration date of the license," and that "failure of a licensee to receive a [renewal form] from the Commission is no excuse for
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1331A1_Rcd.pdf
  • 11485 � 22 (1999). 4947 C.F.R. � 1.925(b)(3). 50See BRS/EBS R&O &FNPRM, 19 FCC Rcd at 14248 � 217 ("As an initial matter, the Commission has stated that each licensee is fully responsible for knowing the term of its license and for filing a timely renewal application."); Daniel Goodman, Receiver, Dr. Robert Chan, Petition for Waiver of Sections 90.633(c) and 1.1102 of the Commission's Rules, Memorandum Opinion and Order on Reconsideration, 13 FCC Rcd 21944, 21972-21973 � 53 (continued....) 8058 Federal Communications Commission DA 09-1331 22. Nonetheless, we conclude, based on the circumstances surrounding the return and dismissals of the Applications, that a waiver is justified under the second prong of the waiver standard. Specifically, we find that failing to renew
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1340A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1340A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1340A1.txt
  • � 22 (1999). 47 C.F.R. � 1.925(b)(3). See BRS/EBS R&O & FNPRM, 19 FCC Rcd at 14248 � 217 (``As an initial matter, the Commission has stated that each licensee is fully responsible for knowing the term of its license and for filing a timely renewal application.''); Daniel Goodman, Receiver, Dr. Robert Chan, Petition for Waiver of Sections 90.633(c) and 1.1102 of the Commission's Rules, Memorandum Opinion and Order on Reconsideration, 13 FCC Rcd 21944, 21972-21973 � 53 (1998) (holding that "[i]t is the responsibility of each licensee to apply for renewal of its license prior to the expiration date of the license," and that "failure of a licensee to receive a [renewal form] from the Commission is no excuse for
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1340A1_Rcd.pdf
  • 11476, 11485 � 22 (1999). 5447 C.F.R. � 1.925(b)(3). 55See BRS/EBS R&O &FNPRM, 19 FCC Rcd at 14248 � 217 ("As an initial matter, the Commission has stated that each licensee is fully responsible for knowing the term of its license and for filing atimely renewal application."); Daniel Goodman, Receiver, Dr. Robert Chan, Petition for Waiver of Sections 90.633(c) and 1.1102 of the Commission's Rules, Memorandum Opinion and Order on Reconsideration, 13 FCC Rcd 21944, 21972-21973 � 53 (1998) (holding that "[i]t is the responsibility of each licensee to apply for renewal of its license prior to the expiration date of the license," and that "failure of a licensee to receive a [renewal form] from the Commission is no excuse for
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1341A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1341A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1341A1.txt
  • � 22 (1999). 47 C.F.R. � 1.925(b)(3). See BRS/EBS R&O & FNPRM, 19 FCC Rcd at 14248 � 217 (``As an initial matter, the Commission has stated that each licensee is fully responsible for knowing the term of its license and for filing a timely renewal application.''); Daniel Goodman, Receiver, Dr. Robert Chan, Petition for Waiver of Sections 90.633(c) and 1.1102 of the Commission's Rules, Memorandum Opinion and Order on Reconsideration, 13 FCC Rcd 21944, 21972-21973 � 53 (1998) (holding that "[i]t is the responsibility of each licensee to apply for renewal of its license prior to the expiration date of the license," and that "failure of a licensee to receive a [renewal form] from the Commission is no excuse for
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1341A1_Rcd.pdf
  • 11485 � 22 (1999). 4047 C.F.R. � 1.925(b)(3). 41See BRS/EBS R&O &FNPRM, 19 FCC Rcd at 14248 � 217 ("As an initial matter, the Commission has stated that each licensee is fully responsible for knowing the term of its license and for filing a timely renewal application."); Daniel Goodman, Receiver, Dr. Robert Chan, Petition for Waiver of Sections 90.633(c) and 1.1102 of the Commission's Rules, Memorandum Opinion and Order on Reconsideration, 13 FCC Rcd 21944, 21972-21973 � 53 (1998) (holding that "[i]t is the responsibility of each licensee to apply for renewal of its license prior to the expiration date of the license," and that "failure of a licensee to receive a [renewal form] from the Commission is no excuse for
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1876A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1876A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1876A1.txt
  • primary licenses exist for T-Mobile or other ET licensees to relocate or protect. Alternative Request for Waiver Orange Crush pleads in the alternative that the arguments made for the declaratory ruling would also justify a waiver of the rules. However, Section 8 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. � 158, which is implemented by Section � 1.1102(5)(q) of the Commission's rules, requires a filing fee for private microwave waiver requests and Orange Crush did not tender this fee. Under the Commission's rules, filings accompanied by insufficient fees or no fees, will be billed for the amount due and 25 percent penalty if the discrepancy is not discovered until after 30 calendar days from the receipt of the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1876A1_Rcd.pdf
  • licenses exist for T-Mobile or other ET licensees to relocate or protect. B. Alternative Request for Waiver 13. Orange Crush pleads in the alternative that the arguments made for the declaratory ruling would also justify a waiver of the rules. However, Section 8 of the Communications Act of1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. � 158, which is implemented by Section � 1.1102(5)(q) of the Commission's rules, requires a filing fee for private microwave waiver requests40and Orange Crush did not tender this fee. Under the Commission's rules, filings accompanied by insufficient fees or no fees, will be billed for the amount due and 25 percent penalty if the discrepancy is not discovered until after 30 calendar days from the receipt of the application
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1972A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1972A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1972A1.txt
  • at 2-3; Evans Waiver Request at 1-2. See BRS/EBS R&O & FNPRM, 19 FCC Rcd at 14248 � 217 (``As an initial matter, the Commission has stated that each licensee is fully responsible for knowing the term of its license and for filing a timely renewal application.''); Daniel Goodman, Receiver, Dr. Robert Chan, Petition for Waiver of Sections 90.633(c) and 1.1102 of the Commission's Rules, Memorandum Opinion and Order on Reconsideration, 13 FCC Rcd 21944, 21972-21973 � 53 (1998) (holding that "[i]t is the responsibility of each licensee to apply for renewal of its license prior to the expiration date of the license," and that "failure of a licensee to receive a [renewal form] from the Commission is no excuse for
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1972A1_Rcd.pdf
  • Request at 2-3; Evans Waiver Request at 1-2. 29See BRS/EBS R&O &FNPRM, 19 FCC Rcd at 14248 � 217 ("As an initial matter, the Commission has stated that each licensee is fully responsible for knowing the term of its license and for filing a timely renewal application."); Daniel Goodman, Receiver, Dr. Robert Chan, Petition for Waiver of Sections 90.633(c) and 1.1102 of the Commission's Rules, Memorandum Opinion and Order on Reconsideration, 13 FCC Rcd 21944, 21972-21973 � 53 (1998) (holding that "[i]t is the responsibility of each licensee to apply for renewal of its license prior to the expiration date of the license," and that "failure of a licensee to receive a [renewal form] from the Commission is no excuse for
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-658A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-658A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-658A1.txt
  • Notice of Proposed Rule Making, WT Docket No. 00-48 & PR Docket No. 92-257, 21 FCC Rcd 10282, 10305 � 41 (2006). See 73 Fed. Reg. 4475, 4479 (Jan. 25, 2008). See 47 C.F.R. � 13.13(b). See 47 C.F.R. � 13.17. See 47 C.F.R. � 13.17(a). The filing fee for a replacement license is currently $60.00. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.1102(9)-(10). See 47 C.F.R. � 13.15(a). See 47 C.F.R. � 13.15(b). PUBLIC NOTICE Federal Communications Commission 445 12th St., S.W. Washington, D.C. 20554 News Media Information 202 / 418-0500 Internet: http://www.fcc.gov TTY: 1-888-835-5322 u v ��PNG r v ��"r�9 I'6� �d�Y�͆aX ���; Wh� �X,�aX���y�]\\.W`h���va6l! �v"]�V�at�������-``````�"m(c)x<��G�<���={-N��J%t�<== �"""x ҍ� � ��(c)���!��'' �R)&� �A�� "���\��v`` � 6� �� + 1 2 + 1 2
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-384A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-384A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-384A1.txt
  • � 22 (1999). 47 C.F.R. � 1.925(b)(3). See BRS/EBS R&O & FNPRM, 19 FCC Rcd at 14248 � 217 (``As an initial matter, the Commission has stated that each licensee is fully responsible for knowing the term of its license and for filing a timely renewal application.''); Daniel Goodman, Receiver, Dr. Robert Chan, Petition for Waiver of Sections 90.633(c) and 1.1102 of the Commission's Rules, Memorandum Opinion and Order on Reconsideration, 13 FCC Rcd 21944, 21972-21973 � 53 (1998) (holding that "[i]t is the responsibility of each licensee to apply for renewal of its license prior to the expiration date of the license," and that "failure of a licensee to receive a [renewal form] from the Commission is no excuse for
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-384A1_Rcd.pdf
  • renewal application was granted. 2547 C.F.R. � 1.925(b)(3). 26See BRS/EBS R&O &FNPRM, 19 FCC Rcd at 14248 � 217 ("As an initial matter, the Commission has stated that each licensee is fully responsible for knowing the term of its license and for filing a timely renewal application."); Daniel Goodman, Receiver, Dr. Robert Chan, Petition for Waiver of Sections 90.633(c) and 1.1102 of the Commission's Rules, Memorandum Opinion and Order on Reconsideration, 13 FCC Rcd 21944, 21972-21973 � 53 (1998) (holding that "[i]t is the responsibility of each licensee to apply for renewal of its license prior to the expiration date of the license," and that "failure of a licensee to receive a [renewal form] from the Commission is no excuse for
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-957A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-957A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-957A1.txt
  • R&O & FNPRM}{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0 \ltrch\fcs0 , 19 FCC Rcd at 14248 \'b6 217 (\'93As an initial matter, the Commission has stated that each licensee is fully responsible for knowing the term of its license and for filing a timely renewal application.\'94);}{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0 \ltrch\fcs0 \i }{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0 \ltrch\fcs0 Daniel Goodman, Receiver, Dr. Robert Chan, Petition for Waiver of Sections 90.633(c) and 1.1102 of the Commission's Rules, }{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0 \ltrch\fcs0 \i Memorandum Opinion and Order on Reconsideration}{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0 \ltrch\fcs0 , 13 FCC Rcd 21944, 21972-21973 \'b6 53 (1998) (holding that "[i]t is the responsibility of each licensee to apply for renewal of its license prior to the expiration date of the license," and that "failure of a licensee to receive a [renewal form]
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-957A1_Rcd.pdf
  • � 22 (1999). 2047 C.F.R. � 1.925(b)(3). 21See BRS/EBS R&O & FNPRM, 19 FCC Rcd at 14248 � 217 ("As an initial matter, the Commission has stated that each licensee is fully responsible for knowing the term of its license and for filing a timely renewal application."); Daniel Goodman, Receiver, Dr. Robert Chan, Petition for Waiver of Sections 90.633(c) and 1.1102 of the Commission's Rules, Memorandum Opinion and Order on Reconsideration, 13 FCC Rcd 21944, 21972-21973 � 53 (1998) (holding that "[i]t is the responsibility of each licensee to apply for renewal of its license prior to the expiration date of the license," and that "failure of a licensee to receive a [renewal form] from the Commission is no excuse for
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-370A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-370A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-370A1.txt
  • the public interest; or in view of unique or unusual factual circumstances of the instant case, application of the rule(s) would be inequitable, unduly burdensome or contrary to the public interest, or the applicant has no reasonable alternative. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.925(b)(3). See 47 C.F.R. � 1.946(e). EBS licensees are not subject to application fees. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.1102. With a renewal application, only the licensee's administrative information or contact information can be updated. EBS licensees are not subject to application fees. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.1102. As will be detailed below, EBS licensees relying on the EBS-specific safe harbor will be required to provide additional information regarding their compliance with these provisions. See BRS/EBS 2d R&O, 21 FCC
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-370A1_Rcd.pdf
  • login to ULS License Manager and click on the applicable call sign link displayed on the "My Licenses" page. On the "License at a Glance" screen the applicant should select the "Renew License"link in the "Work on This License" box on the right side of the screen. The system 15EBS licenseesare not subject to application fees. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.1102. 2155 will then launch a renewal application for the call sign from which the application was initiated. Call signs cannot be added to an application that is initiated for a single call sign. Multiple Call Signs: To launch an application for multiple call signs, the applicant should log in to ULS License Manager and select the "Renew Licenses"link in the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-490A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-490A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-490A1.txt
  • 19 FCC Rcd at 14248 � 218. See BRS/EBS R&O & FNPRM, 19 FCC Rcd at 14248 � 217 (``As an initial matter, the Commission has stated that each licensee is fully responsible for knowing the term of its license and for filing a timely renewal application.''); Daniel Goodman, Receiver, Dr. Robert Chan, Petition for Waiver of Sections 90.633(c) and 1.1102 of the Commission's Rules, Memorandum Opinion and Order on Reconsideration, 13 FCC Rcd 21944, 21972-21973 � 53 (1998) (holding that "[i]t is the responsibility of each licensee to apply for renewal of its license prior to the expiration date of the license," and that "failure of a licensee to receive a [renewal form] from the Commission is no excuse for
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-490A1_Rcd.pdf
  • 52BRS/EBS R&O,19 FCC Rcd at 14248 � 218. 53See BRS/EBS R&O &FNPRM, 19 FCC Rcd at 14248 � 217 ("As an initial matter, the Commission has stated that each licensee is fully responsible for knowing the term of its license and for filing a timely renewal application."); Daniel Goodman, Receiver, Dr. Robert Chan, Petition for Waiver of Sections 90.633(c) and 1.1102 of the Commission's Rules, Memorandum Opinion and Orderon Reconsideration, 13 FCC Rcd 21944, 21972-21973 � 53 (1998) (holding that "[i]t is the responsibility of each licensee to apply for renewal of its license prior to the expiration date of the license," and that "failure of a licensee to receive a [renewal form] from the Commission is no excuse for failure
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-561A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-561A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-561A1.txt
  • Service, Memorandum Opinion and Order, 23 FCC Rcd 5894 (WTB 2008) (``LMDS Order''). Extension Request at 9-10, citing In the Matter of Consolidated Request of the WCS Coalition for Limited Waiver of Construction Deadline for 132 WCS Licenses, Order, 21 FCC Rcd 14134 (2006) (``WCS Order''). See 47 U.S.C. � 158. See 47 U.S.C. � 158(g). See 47 C.F.R. � 1.1102, Table, Section 5r (2009). See 47 C.F.R. � 1.1119(a). See 47 C.F.R. � 1.1119(e). Id. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.1118(c). Petition for Waiver of Application Fees, Metropolitan Area Networks, Inc. (filed Jun. 12, 2009) (``Fee Waiver Petition''). See File No. 0003869908. Individual dismissal letters were generated in the Universal Licensing System for each application that was dismissed. The application for
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-561A1_Rcd.pdf
  • and Demonstrate Substantial Service, Memorandum Opinion and Order, 23 FCC Rcd 5894 (WTB 2008) ("LMDS Order"). 23Extension Request at 9-10, citing In the Matter of Consolidated Request of the WCS Coalition for Limited Waiver of Construction Deadline for 132 WCS Licenses, Order, 21 FCC Rcd 14134 (2006) ("WCS Order"). 24See47 U.S.C. � 158. 25See47 U.S.C. � 158(g). 26See47 C.F.R. � 1.1102, Table, Section 5r (2009). 3828 Federal Communications Commission DA 12-561 interest."27Under Section 1.1119(e) of the Commission's Rules, "Applicants seeking waivers must submit the request for waiver with the application for filing, required fee and FCC Form 159, or a request for deferral."28If a fee waiver is granted, the submitted fees will be refunded.29If application fees are deferred, the applicant will
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-212146A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-212146A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-212146A1.txt
  • letter 90 days before license expiration. This renewal reminder letter is provided as a courtesy, and failure to receive a reminder will not serve as a basis for reinstatement of an expired license. Applications for renewal may be filed no earlier than 90 days prior to expiration date. Application Fees Applicants using ULS remain subject to application fees under Section 1.1102 of the rules, 47 CFR � 1.1102. ULS, however, will simplify the process of submitting fees to the Commission. When an applicant submits an application electronically, ULS will assign a file number and show the correct fee amount due and the payment type code on a confirmation screen. Clicking on the ``Form 159'' button will display an FCC 159 Form
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-249897A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-249897A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-249897A1.txt
  • the Interim Process Notice: New fee rates will be effective August 10, 2004. For filings on or after August 10, 2004,[38] applicants and licensees must check the Wireless Telecommunications Bureau Fee Guide for the current fees.[39] The 70-80-90 GHz bands are licensed for microwave point-to-point operations (common carrier or private operational fixed)[40] which are subject to filing fees under Section 1.1102 and regulatory fees under Sections 1.1152 or 1.1154, as applicable.[41] Certain applicants are exempt from filing and/or regulatory fees.[42] Nonexempt applicants for new, non-exclusive nationwide licenses will be subject to microwave service filing and regulatory fees as follows: New license applications must use fee type code CJPR.[43] Currently, the combined fee is $470. Modification of license applications must use fee
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-250400A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-250400A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-250400A1.txt
  • Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Federal Communications Commission Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C. 20554 In the matter of Amendment of the Schedule of Application Fees Set Forth In Section 1.1102 through 1.1107 of the Commission's Rules ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) GEN Docket No. 86-285 ERRATUM Released: August 2, 2004 By the Office of the Managing Director, Financial Operations Division: The Report and Order (FCC 04-150) released with the above caption on June 25, 2004, reference an incorrect fee amount ``$830.00'' and payment type code ``MPD''
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-285507A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-285507A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-285507A1.txt
  • and � 1.1109 of the Commission's rules, and renumber them as the new � 1.1110 and � 1.1111. The new � 1.1111 has been restructured for reasons of clarity. The new � 1.1110 and � 1.1111 should read as follows: � 1.1110 Attachment of charges. The charges required to accompany a request for the Commission regulatory services listed in �� 1.1102 through 1.1109 of this subpart will not be refundable to the applicant irrespective of the Commission's disposition of that request. Return or refund of charges will be made only in certain limited instances as set out at � 1.1115 of this subpart. � 1.1111 Payment of charges. (a) The schedule of fees for applications and other filings (Bureau/Office Fee Filing
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-307946A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-307946A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-307946A1.txt
  • Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C. 20554 In the Matter of Amendment of the Schedule of Application Fees Set Forth In Sections 1.1102 through 1.1109 of the Commission's Rules ) ) ) ) ) ) GEN Docket No. 86-285 ERRATUM Released: June 23, 2011 By the Deputy Managing Director: On June 20, 2011, the Commission released a Second Order, FCC 11-98, in the above captioned proceeding. This Erratum corrects section 1.2107(c) under paragraph 2 of the Appendix to read as follows: ``* *
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-310873A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-310873A2.txt
  • 771.071. 13 Thewireless9-1-1fee,prepaidwireless9-1-1fee,andequalizationsurchargearestatewidefeesthatareremitted byserviceproviderstotheTexasComptrollerofPublicAccounts.Eachmonth,CSECdistributestotheECDstheir pro-ratashareofremittedwirelessandprepaidwireless9-1-1fees.Onaquarterlybasis,CSECallocatestothe RPCstheirpro-ratashareofappropriatedwirelessand,startinginFY2012,prepaidwireless9-1-1fees. AppropriatedequalizationsurchargeisusedbyCSECtofundthestate'spoisoncontrolprogramandtosupplement thoseRPCswhoseallocatedwireline/wireless/prepaidwireless9-1-1feesareinsufficienttofund9-1-1service. 14 PerTexasComptrollerrule(effectiveOctober21,2010),collectedprepaidwireless9-1-1feesareonlyrequiredto beremittedeachcalendarquarter. 15 Atthetimeoffiling,CSEChadnotreceivedthe2010wirelineamountsforCalhounCounty9-1-1Emergency CommunicationDistrict,AransasPassMunicipalECD,andEnnisMunicipalECD. Marlene H.Dortch OMBControlNumber3060-1122 April11,2011 Page 4of6 FCCREQUEST:Astatementdescribinghowthefundscollectedaremadeavailableto localities,andwhetheryourstatehasestablishedwrittencriteriaregardingtheallowableusesof thecollectedfunds,includingthelegalcitationtosuchcriteria. RESPONSE:9-1-1serviceinTexasisprovidedeitherviathestateprogramadministeredby CSECandimplementedthroughthestate's24RPCsoratthecounty/municipallevelbyoneof thestate's 51ECDs. Fundingofthestate9-1-1programisprovidedforbytheTexasLegislatureviaabiennial appropriationtoCSECfromcollectedwireline,wirelessandsurchargefeesremittedtotheTexas ComptrollerofPublicAccounts("Comptroller")anddepositedintodedicatedaccounts.CSEC providesgrantsofappropriatedfundstothe24RPCs.TheRPCspay9-1-1serviceexpenses directlytoserviceprovidersandmakegrantfundsavailablethroughInterlocalAgreementswith thelocalgovernmentunitswithineachRPC'sregionthatprovide9-1-1serviceaspartofthe state9-1-1program.ECDsimpose,collectandmakeavailablewireline9-1-1feesatthelocal levelinaccordancewitheitherHealthandSafetyCodeChapter772orviatheirlocalgoverning bodiesandordinances--dependinguponthetypeofECD. Thestatewidewireless(includingprepaidwireless)9-1-1feesareremittedtotheComptroller. RemittedwirelessfeesaredistributedbyCSECtoeachECDbasedontheratiooftheECD's populationtothepopulationofthestate.16ECDsallocatetheirproportionofwirelessfeesto theirlocalgoverningbodiesinthesamemanneraswireline 9-1-1fees.Aspreviouslystated,the state9-1-1programreceivesappropriatedwireless9-1-1fundsviagrantsbyCSECtotheRPCs. Appropriatedwireline9-1-1feeswithinthestate9-1-1programareaareallocatedbyCSECto RPCs"foruseinproviding9-1-1servicesasprovidedbycontractsexecutedunderSection 771.078.,,17Wireline9-1-1feescollectedwithintheareasof772ECDsareaccountedforinthe ECDs'annualbudgetandcanonlybeexpendedfor9-1-1purposesasexpresslyprovidedbythe applicablelawinChapter772.18Theuseofwireline9-1-1feescollectedbyMunicipalECDsis prescribedbyapplicablelawsorordinancesforexpendingfundsinaccordancewithcityand countybudgets.19Wireless9-1-1fees,regardlessofthe9-1-1entityinreceiptthereof,"maybe usedonlyforservicesrelatedto9-1-1service.,,20Appropriatedequalizationsurchargeis allocatedbyCSECto"fundapprovedplansofregionalplanningcommissionsandregional 16 �771.0711(c). 17 �771.071(f). 18 ��772.114,772.214,and772.314;TexasAtt'yGenOp.No.JC-4l0. 19 Tex.LocalGov.Code,Chapter102(citybudgets);Tex.LocalGov.Code,ChapterIII(countybudgets). See alsoe.g.,CityofUniversityParkCodeofOrdinance1.1102;CityofLancasterOrdinance,Chapter1,Article1.400, Sec.1.402;CityofHutchins,OrdinanceNo.692,Sec.1.,Art.11.801. 20 Tex.Health&SafetyCode �771.0711(c). Marlene H.Dortch OMBControlNumber3060-1122 April11,2011 Page5of6 poisoncontrolcenters[underSection777.009]andtocarryoutitsdutiesunderthischapter.,,21. Surchargemayalsobeappropriatedto"fundcountyandregionalemergencymedicalservices, designatedtraumafacilities,andtraumacaresystems.,,22 FCCREQUEST:AstatementidentifyinganyentityinyourStatethathastheauthorityto approvetheexpenditureoffundscollectedfor911orE911purposes,andadescriptionofany oversightproceduresestablishedtodeterminethatcollectedfundshavebeenmadeavailableor usedforthepurposesdesignatedbythefundingmechanism,orotherwiseusedtoimplementor support911orE911. RESPONSE:CSECadministersthestate9-1-1programandreceivesfundingfortheprogram throughalegislativeappropriation.CSEC'sappropriationrequestisderivedfromdetailed informationsubmittedbyeachofthe24RPCstoCSECregardingthecosttofundeachregion's 9-1-1program.TheresultinglegislativeappropriationprescribeswithsomespecificityCSEC's allocationofappropriatedfunds.Additionally,CSECmayonlyallocateappropriatedmoniesto thoseRPCswithCSEC-approvedregional9-1-1plans,andthenonlyviacontractswitheach Ryedetailing ho,x/allocatedmoniesaretobeused.23Finally,each issubjecttoaudit by thestateauditorattherequestofthePublicUtilityCommissionofTexas.24 Regardinglocaladministrationof9-1-1service,the772ECDsaregovernedbyaBoardof Managers("Board")comprisedofrepresentativesfromeachofthegovernmentaljurisdictions participatingintheECD.TheBoardhasthestatutoryauthorityunderTexasHealthandSafety CodeChapter772toapproveallowable9-1-1expensesinaccordancewithitsannualbudget. AllowableexpensesforsuchECDs"includeallcostsattributabletodesigninga9-1-1system andtoallequipmentandpersonnelnecessarytoestablishandoperateapublicsafetyanswering pointandotherrelatedansweringpointsthattheboardconsidersnecessary.,,25772ECDsare alsorequiredtohavetheirdirectorsubmitaswornstatementonallmoneyreceivedand disbursedandhaveanindependentfinancialaudit.26MunicipalECDs'budgets,andaudits thereof,aresubjecttoapplicablemunicipalordinancesand/orTexasLocalGovernmentCode Chapters102(budgets)and103(auditoffinances).ThesolecountyMunicipalECD-the DallasCountySheriff'sOffice-issubjecttoTexasLocalGovernmentCode,Chapters111 (budget)and112(financialaccounting). FCCREQUEST:Astatementwhetherallthefundscollectedfor911orE911purposeshave beenmadeavailableorusedforthepurposesdesignatedbythefundingmechanism,orotherwise 21 �771.072(1). 22 �771.072(g)(quotationfrom�773.122regardingEmergencyMedicalServices). 23 ��771.056and771.078. 24 �771.076(c). 25 ��772.117,772.217,and772.317. 26 ��772.109,772.209,and772.309. MarleneH.Dortch OMBControlNumber3060-1122 April11,2011 Page6of6 usedfortheimplementationorsupportof911orE911..
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-152A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-152A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-152A1.txt
  • and subsequently resubmitted beyond the sixty-day cut-off date established by Altron's application. The Division reinstated the application nunc pro tunc because it determined that Form 159 was superfluous and therefore was not a sufficient basis on which to dismiss an otherwise complete application. Altron contends that the Division, in reaching this conclusion, improperly relied on the tables associated with Section 1.1102 of the Commission's Rules and altered the fee form correction rules and policies affirmed in the Fees II Reconsideration. We disagree. The Division properly applied the rules in force at the time DCT filed its application. Section 1.1102 did not require the filing of Form 159 with applications for new microwave facilities. Further, Section 1.1110 of the Commission's Rules provided,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-235A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-235A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-235A1.txt
  • 3; Motorola Comments at 4; Blooston Mordkofsky Comments at 2; UTC Comments at 4; PCIA Comments at 3. Motorola Comments at 4. Day Catalano Comments at 3. Day Catalano Comments at 3. LMCC Comments at 4; PCIA Comments at 3. LMCC Comments at 4. LMCC Comments at 4. Motorola Comments at 4. See 47 C.F.R. � 90.149(a). See 47 C.F.R. 1.1102. Notice, 13 FCC Rcd at 21,137. See Motorola Comments at 5; Day Catalano Comments at 4; Blooston Mordkofsky Comments at 2; and UTC Comments at 3. See also PCIA Comments at 4-5. APCO Comments at 2. API Comments at 4. API Reply Comments at 4. 47 C.F.R. � 90.135. For example, Location and Monitoring Service stations (47 C.F.R. � 90.353),
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-421A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-421A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-421A1.txt
  • operator's FCC Registration Number (FRN) as required under subpart W of Part 1 of this Title. See 47 U.S.C. � 159 and Assessment and Collection of Regulatory Fees for Fiscal Year 2000, MD Docket No. 00-58, FCC 00-240 (rel. July 7, 2000) (regulatory fees); 47 U.S.C. � 158 and Amendment of the Schedule of Application Fees Set Forth in Sections 1.1102 through 1.1107 of the Commission's Rules, 13 FCC Rcd 13614 (1998) (application fees). See, e.g., 47 U.S.C. � 503; 47 C.F.R. � 1.80; see also Forfeiture Policy Statement and Amendment of Section 1.80 of the Rules to Incorporate the Forfeiture Guidelines, 12 FCC Rcd 17087 (1997), recon. denied, 15 FCC Rcd 303 (1999). See 47 U.S.C. � 309(j). See 47
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-51A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-51A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-51A1.txt
  • See 47 C.F.R. � 90.139(c) (1992) (Commission processing of applications). See 47 C.F.R. � 1.3 (Suspension, amendment or waiver of rules). See 47 C.F.R. � 90.175 (1992) (Frequency coordination requirements). See 47 C.F.R. �� 90.119(a)(1), 90.119(a)(3) (1992) (FCC Form 574 shall be used to apply for new station authorizations and for modification of an existing authorization). See 47 C.F.R. � 1.1102(6) (Schedule of charges for private radio service, Land Mobile Stations: (a) New, Reinstatement, Modification and/or Renewal (per call sign). As noted above, Interstate's request also was in all events exempt from the public notice, waiting period, and petition to deny provisions of Section 309 of the Act. We note that any dismissal of the modification application, as defective, would have
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-101A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-101A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-101A1.txt
  • Review filed by Chadmoore Wireless Group, Inc. is DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Magalie Roman Salas Secretary In re Chadmoore Wireless Group, Petition for Reconsideration of October 9, 1998 Licensee List, Order on Reconsideration, DA 99-2496 (rel. Nov. 9, 1999) (Chadmoore Reconsideration Order). In the Matter of Daniel R. Goodman, Receiver; Dr. Robert Chan, Petition for Waiver of Sections 90.633(c) and 1.1102 of the Commission's Rules, Memorandum Opinion and Order, 10 FCC Rcd 8537 (1995) (Goodman/Chan I); Memorandum Opinion and Order and Order on Reconsideration, 13 FCC Rcd 21,944 (1998) (Goodman/Chan II). Chadmoore did not seek reconsideration by the Commission of Goodman/Chan II, but instead appealed that order to the D.C. Circuit. Chadmoore's appeal was subsequently dismissed. See Daniel R. Goodman et
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-138A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-138A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-138A1.txt
  • Nathan Sherman Enterprises, Inc. for convenience. See Nathan Sherman Enterprises, Inc. et al., Order on Reconsideration, DA 99-2705 (rel. Dec. 3, 1999) (Sherman). See Application for Review filed by Nathan Sherman Enterprises, Inc., January 3, 2000, at ii, 7 (Application). See also In the Matter of Daniel R. Goodman, Receiver; Dr. Robert Chan, Petition for Waiver of Sections 90.633(c) and 1.1102 of the Commission's Rules, Memorandum Opinion and Order, 10 FCC Rcd 8537 (1995) (Goodman/Chan I); Memorandum Opinion and Order and Order on Reconsideration, 13 FCC Rcd 21,944 (1998) (Goodman/Chan II). See Sherman at � 3. See Application at 6, � 10; see also Sherman at �4. See Sherman at � 3. See Application at 8-9, �� 13-14; see also Goodman/Chan
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-144A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-144A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-144A1.txt
  • Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit � Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C. 20554 In the Matter of Daniel R. Goodman, Receiver; Dr. Robert Chan Petition for Waiver of Section 90.633(c) and 1.1102 of the Commission's Rules Request for Waiver of Section 90.633(c) of the Commission's Rules by Various 800 MHz SMR Licensees Request for Waiver of Section 90.609(b) of the Commission's Rule Prohibiting the Transfer and Assignment of Unconstructed Licenses Request for Extension of License Term of 800 MHz Licensees ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-196A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-196A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-196A1.txt
  • request that is not filed as a separate pleading will not be considered by the Commission. Requests for deferral of a fee payment for financial hardship must be accompanied by supporting documentation. Petitions and applications for review submitted with a fee must be submitted to the Commission's lockbox bank at the address for the appropriate service set forth in sections 1.1102 through 1.1105 of this subpart. If no fee payment is submitted, the request should be filed with the Commission's Secretary. * * * * * 3. Section 1.1152 is revised to read as follows: � 1.1152 Schedule of annual regulatory fees and filing locations for wireless radio services. Exclusive use services (per license) Fee Amount Address 1. Land Mobile (Above
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-271A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-271A1.txt
  • not submit any filing fees. It contends that no filing fee is applicable because it requests waiver of a general CMRS rule under Part 20 of the Commission's rules, rather than waiver of a service-specific rule for the SMR service under Part 90 of the Commission's rules.45 To the extent the Commission determines otherwise, however, Cingular requests waiver of Section 1.1102(6) of the Commission's rules.46 Section 1.1102(6) requires land mobile licensees, including SMR licensees, to pay a filing fee of $145 per license for which waiver is sought.47 Specifically, Cingular argues that a waiver of the fee filing requirement is warranted in this instance because the request is generic in nature and is not associated with any specific licenses, the number
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-370A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-370A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-370A1.txt
  • proceeding IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Magalie Roman Salas Secretary In re Application of Mobile UHF, Inc., Memorandum Opinion and Order, 15 FCC Rcd 15,007 (CWD 2000). The subject call sign was assigned from Mobile UHF, Inc. to MWS Communications LLC, consummated April 2, 2001. See Daniel R. Goodman, Receiver; Dr. Robert Chan; Petitions for Waiver of Sections 90.633(c) and 1.1102 of the Commission's Rules, Request for Waiver of Section 90.633(c) of the Commission's Rules by Various 800 MHz SMR Licensees, Request for Waiver of Section 90.609(b) of the Commission's Rules Prohibiting the Transfer and Assignment of Unconstructed Licenses, Request for Extension of License Term of 800 MHz SMR Licensees, Memorandum Opinion and Order, 13 FCC Rcd 21944 (1998). Supra, note
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-202A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-202A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-202A1.txt
  • Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C. 20554 In the matter of Amendment of the Schedule Of Application Fees Set Forth In Section 1.1102 through 1.1107 Of the Commission's Rules ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) GEN Docket No. 86-285 ORDER Adopted: July 1, 2002 Released: July 12, 2002 By the Commission: 1. By this action, the Commission amends its Schedule of Application Fees, 47 C.F.R. Section 1.1102 et seq., to adjust the fees for processing applications and other filings. Section
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-202A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-202A2.txt
  • Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit 47 CFR Part 1 is amended as follows: Part 1 - Practice and Procedure 1. The authority citation for Part 1 continues to read as follows: Authority: 47 U.S.C. 154, 303, 503(b)(5); 5 U.S.C. 552 and 21 U.S.C. 853a, unless otherwise noted. 2. Section 1.1102 is revised to read as follows: �1.1102 Schedule of charges for applications and other filings in the wireless telecommunications services. Those services designated with an asterisk in the payment type code column have associated regulatory fees that must be paid at the same time the application fee is paid. Please refer to Section 1.1152 for the appropriate regulatory fee that
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-205A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-205A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-205A1.txt
  • advance for the entire license term. Therefore, the annual fee amount shown in this table that is a small fee (categories 1 through 5) must be multiplied by the 5- or 10-year license term, as appropriate, to arrive at the total amount of regulatory fees owed. It should be further noted that application fees may also apply as detailed in �1.1102 of this chapter. These are standard fees that are to be paid in accordance with � 1.1157(b) of this chapter. These are standard fees that are to be paid in accordance with � 1.1157(b) of this chapter. 5 U.S.C. 603. The RFA, 5 U.S.C. 601 et. seq., has been amended by the Contract With America Advancement Act of 1996, Public
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-290A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-290A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-290A1.txt
  • Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit � * * * * * * � Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C. 20554 In the matter of Amendment of the Schedule of Application Fees Set Forth In Section 1.1102 through 1.1107 of the Commission's Rules ) ) ) ) ) ) GEN Docket No. 86-285 ORDER Adopted: October 16, 2002 Released: October 18, 2002 By the Commission: This Order changes the effective date of our previous Order in this proceeding adjusting the fees for processing applications and other filings to reflect the net change in the Consumer Price Index
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-102A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-102A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-102A1.txt
  • location is available. Space Station Reform NPRM, 17 FCC Rcd at 3886 (para. 117). The Commission listed the satellite application fees in the Notice, but those fees have since been increased. The application fees are now $98,645 for each GSO space station, and $339,730 for each NGSO satellite system. Amendment of the Schedule of Application Fees Set Forth in Section 1.1102 through 1.1107 of the Commission's Rules, Order, GEN Docket No. 86-285, 17 FCC Rcd 13948, 13982-83 (2002). These fees took effect on December 5, 2002. See Notice of Publication in the Federal Register and Announcement of Effective Date of Schedule of Charges for Application Fees, Public Notice, DA 02-3080 (released Nov. 7, 2002). Currently, the regulatory fee is $99,700 per
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-102A1_Erratum.doc
  • location is available. Space Station Reform NPRM, 17 FCC Rcd at 3886 (para. 117). The Commission listed the satellite application fees in the Notice, but those fees have since been increased. The application fees are now $98,645 for each GSO space station, and $339,730 for each NGSO satellite system. Amendment of the Schedule of Application Fees Set Forth in Section 1.1102 through 1.1107 of the Commission's Rules, Order, GEN Docket No. 86-285, 17 FCC Rcd 13948, 13982-83 (2002). These fees took effect on December 5, 2002. See Notice of Publication in the Federal Register and Announcement of Effective Date of Schedule of Charges for Application Fees, Public Notice, DA 02-3080 (released Nov. 7, 2002). Currently, the regulatory fee is $99,700 per
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-113A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-113A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-113A1.txt
  • Address Systems band (Part 101 of this chapter); the Local Television Transmission Service (Part 101 of this chapter); the Private-Operational Fixed Point-to-Point Microwave Service (Part 101 of this chapter); and, the Common Carrier Fixed Point-to-Point Microwave Service (Part 101 of this chapter). Streamlined approval procedures. (i) Applications, if sufficiently complete and the required application fee has been paid (see � 1.1102 of this part), will be accepted for filing and will be placed on public notice, except no prior public notice will be required for applications involving authorizations in the Private Wireless Services, as specified in � 1.933(d)(9) of this part. Petitions to deny filed in accordance with � 309(d) of the Communications Act must comply with the provisions of �
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-113A1_Erratum.doc
  • Address Systems band (Part 101 of this chapter); the Local Television Transmission Service (Part 101 of this chapter); the Private-Operational Fixed Point-to-Point Microwave Service (Part 101 of this chapter); and, the Common Carrier Fixed Point-to-Point Microwave Service (Part 101 of this chapter). Streamlined approval procedures. (i) Applications, if sufficiently complete and the required application fee has been paid (see � 1.1102 of this part), will be accepted for filing and will be placed on public notice, except no prior public notice will be required for applications involving authorizations in the Private Wireless Services, as specified in � 1.933(d)(9) of this part. Petitions to deny filed in accordance with � 309(d) of the Communications Act must comply with the provisions of �
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-177A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-177A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-177A1.txt
  • of harmless errors). MMDS Order, 8 FCC Rcd at 5440 � 5. Id. 743 F.2d 918, 928 (D.C. Cir. 1984). 47 C.F.R. � 1.110. See Conditional License. MMDS Statement at 1. See MMDS Order, 8 FCC Rcd 5440 at � 5. AFR at 8. Id. See Daniel R. Goodman, Receiver, Dr. Robert Chan, Petition for Waiver of Sections 90.633(c) and 1.1102 of the Commission's Rules, Memorandum Opinion and Order on Reconsideration, 13 FCC Rcd 21944, 21972-73 � 53 (1998) (``Erroneous advice received from a government employee is insufficient [to warrant estoppel against the government], particularly when the relief requested would be contrary to an applicable statute or rule.'') Id. at 9; citing Communications Tech Management of Texas, Inc., Memorandum Opinion and
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-184A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-184A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-184A1.txt
  • advance for the entire license term. Therefore, the annual fee amount shown in this table that is a small fee (categories 1 through 5) must be multiplied by the 5- or 10-year license term, as appropriate, to arrive at the total amount of regulatory fees owed. It should be further noted that application fees may also apply as detailed in �1.1102 of this chapter. These are standard fees that are to be paid in accordance with � 1.1157(b) of this chapter. These are standard fees that are to be paid in accordance with � 1.1157(b) of this chapter. 5 U.S.C. 603. The RFA, 5 U.S.C. 601-612 has been amended by the Contract With America Advancement Act of 1996, Public Law No.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-201A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-201A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-201A1.txt
  • Common Carrier Bureau went beyond delegated authority, based on lack of novel questions of fact, law, or policy). 47 C.F.R. � 1.925(b)(3). See Application for Review at 6. We note also that waiver requests under Section 1.925 ``must be filed on FCC Form 601, 603, or 605,'' and must be accompanied by a $145.00 fee. 47 C.F.R. �� 1.925(a), 1.925(b), 1.1102. Delta did not file its waiver request on one of those forms, nor did it pay a fee. The Media Bureau has no rules-based waiver standard corresponding to 47 C.F.R. � 1.925. Section 1.3 of the Rules (47 C.F.R. � 1.3), under Part 1 - Practice and Procedure, states that rule provisions may be waived ``for good cause shown,'' and
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-56A4.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-56A4.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-56A4.txt
  • amended as follows: PART 1 - PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE 1. The authority citation for Part 1 continues to read: Authority: 47 U.S.C. 151, 154(i), 154(j), 155, 225, 303(R), 309 and 325(e). 2. Section 1.933(c) is amended to add subparagraphs (8) and (9) as follows: * * * * * (8) Multipoint Distribution Service. (9) Instructional Television Fixed Service. 3. Section 1.1102 is amended by amending paragraph 20 to read as follows: 20. Multipoint Distribution Service (including Multi-channel MDS) a. New Station 601 & 159 220.00 CJM Federal Communications Commission, Wireless Bureau Applications, P.O. Box 358155, Pittsburgh, PA 15251-5155. b. Major Modification of License 601 &159 220.00CJM Federal Communications Commission, Wireless Bureau Applications, P.O. Box 358994, Pittsburgh, PA 15251-5155. c. Certification of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-56A4_Erratum.doc
  • amended as follows: PART 1 - PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE 1. The authority citation for Part 1 continues to read: Authority: 47 U.S.C. 151, 154(i), 154(j), 155, 225, 303(R), 309 and 325(e). 2. Section 1.933(c) is amended to add subparagraphs (8) and (9) as follows: * * * * * (8) Multipoint Distribution Service. (9) Instructional Television Fixed Service. 3. Section 1.1102 is amended by amending paragraph 20 to read as follows: 20. Multipoint Distribution Service (including Multi-channel MDS) a. New Station 601 & 159 220.00 CJM Federal Communications Commission, Wireless Bureau Applications, P.O. Box 358155, Pittsburgh, PA 15251-5155. b. Major Modification of License 601 &159 220.00CJM Federal Communications Commission, Wireless Bureau Applications, P.O. Box 358994, Pittsburgh, PA 15251-5155. c. Certification of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-95A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-95A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-95A1.txt
  • data points for each radial should be used in the computation. (b) Average terrain elevation is the average of the eight radial average terrain elevations (for the eight cardinal radials). (c) For locations in Dade and Broward Counties, Florida, the method prescribed above may be used or average terrain elevation may be assumed to be 3 meters (10 feet). Section 1.1102(16)(h) is removed. Section 1.2003 is amended by deleting the phrase ``FCC 409 Airborne Mobile Radio Telephone License Application;'' Title 47, Part 22 of the Code of Federal Regulations, 47 CFR Part 22, is amended as follows: The authority citation for Part 22 continues to read as follows: Authority: 47 U.S.C. 154, 222, 303, 309 and 332. Section 22.1(b) is amended
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-135A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-135A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-135A1.txt
  • of their applications. * * * * * Section 1.815 is amended by deleting and reserving paragraph (c)(1). Section 1.933 is amended by adding paragraphs (c)(8) and (c)(9) to read as follows: � 1.933 Public notices. * * * * * (c) * * * (8) Broadband Radio Service; and (9) Educational Broadband Service. * * * * * Section 1.1102 is amended by revising paragraph (20) to read as follows: � 1.1102 Schedule of charges for applications and other filings in the wireless telecommunication services. * * * * * 20. Broadband Radio Service ________________________________________________________________________ _ Action FCC Form Fee Payment Address No. amount type code a. New Station 601 & 159 220.00 CJM Federal Communications Commission, Wireless Bureau Applications,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-146A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-146A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-146A1.txt
  • advance for the entire license term. Therefore, the annual fee amount shown in this table that is a small fee (categories 1 through 5) must be multiplied by the 5- or 10-year license term, as appropriate, to arrive at the total amount of regulatory fees owed. It should be further noted that application fees may also apply as detailed in �1.1102 of this chapter. These are standard fees that are to be paid in accordance with � 1.1157(b) of this chapter. These are standard fees that are to be paid in accordance with � 1.1157(b) of this chapter. 5 U.S.C. � 603. The RFA, 5 U.S.C. �� 601-612 has been amended by the Contract With America Advancement Act of 1996, Public
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-150A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-150A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-150A1.txt
  • Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C. 20554 In the matter of Amendment of the Schedule of Application Fees Set Forth In Section 1.1102 through 1.1107 of the Commission's Rules ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) GEN Docket No. 86-285 ORDER Adopted: June 23, 2004 Released: June 25, 2004 By the Commission: I. INTRODUCTION 1. By this Order (``R&O''), the Commission makes rule changes to Part 0 and Part 1 of 47 C.F.R., as listed in Appendix A, and amends its
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-167A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-167A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-167A1.txt
  • on the applicable form, FCC Form 603, including any information and certifications (including those of the proposed assignee or transferee relating to eligibility, basic qualifications, and foreign ownership) required by the rules of this chapter and any rules pertaining to the specific service for which the application is filed, and must include payment of the required application fee(s) (see � 1.1102). Once accepted for filing, the application will be placed on public notice, except no prior public notice will be required for applications involving authorizations in the Private Wireless Services, as specified in � 1.933(d)(9). Petitions to deny filed in accordance with section 309(d) of the Communications Act must comply with the provisions of � 1.939, except that such petitions must
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-211A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-211A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-211A1.txt
  • Letter). The Commission may only adjust the Fee Schedule every two years to reflect changes in the Consumer Price Index. See 47 U.S.C. � 158(b)(1). The fees at issue here are $89,460 for an initial or replacement space station authorization and $5740 for modification of a space station authorization. Amendment of the Schedule of Application Fees Set Forth in Sections 1.1102 Through 1.1107 of the Commission's Rules, 13 FCC Rcd 13614 (1998). Lockheed Martin Corp. 16 FCC Rcd 12805, 12807 � 5 (2001). See also Establishment of a Fee Collection Program to Implement the Provisions of the Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1985 (Section 8 Fees Report and Order), 2 FCC Rcd 947, 949 (1987) (stating that ``processing costs were but
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-287A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-287A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-287A1.txt
  • where appropriate, its licensing procedures and easing the administrative burden on licensees and other users of Wireless Radio Services, we eliminate, by revising Sections 1.903(c) and 22.3(b), the requirement that an authorization be obtained to operate general aviation airborne mobile stations in the Air-Ground Radiotelephone Service. We also eliminate FCC Form 409 and delete references to that form in Sections 1.1102 and 1.2003 of our rules. Idle Tone Background. Section 22.811 provides that, when a ground station transmitter authorized to transmit on any Air-Ground Radiotelephone Service channel listed in Section 22.805 (for general aviation air-ground service) is available for service but idle, it must continuously transmit a modulated signal on that channel with a power between 10 and 20 dB lower
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-287A1_Erratum.doc
  • where appropriate, its licensing procedures and easing the administrative burden on licensees and other users of Wireless Radio Services, we eliminate, by revising Sections 1.903(c) and 22.3(b), the requirement that an authorization be obtained to operate general aviation airborne mobile stations in the Air-Ground Radiotelephone Service. We also eliminate FCC Form 409 and delete references to that form in Sections 1.1102 and 1.2003 of our rules. Idle Tone Background. Section 22.811 provides that, when a ground station transmitter authorized to transmit on any Air-Ground Radiotelephone Service channel listed in Section 22.805 (for general aviation air-ground service) is available for service but idle, it must continuously transmit a modulated signal on that channel with a power between 10 and 20 dB lower
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-137A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-137A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-137A1.txt
  • advance for the entire license term. Therefore, the annual fee amount shown in this table that is a small fee (categories 1 through 5) must be multiplied by the 5- or 10-year license term, as appropriate, to arrive at the total amount of regulatory fees owed. It should be further noted that application fees may also apply as detailed in �1.1102 of this chapter. These are standard fees that are to be paid in accordance with � 1.1157(b) of this chapter. These are standard fees that are to be paid in accordance with � 1.1157(b) of this chapter. Federal Communications Commission FCC 05-137 � �@��� �@��� �@��� �@��� 6 p � � 4 5 6 8 9 n o p r
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-102A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-102A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-102A1.txt
  • advance for the entire license term. Therefore, the annual fee amount shown in this table that is a small fee (categories 1 through 5) must be multiplied by the 5- or 10-year license term, as appropriate, to arrive at the total amount of regulatory fees owed. It should be further noted that application fees may also apply as detailed in �1.1102 of this chapter. These are standard fees that are to be paid in accordance with � 1.1157(b) of this chapter. These are standard fees that are to be paid in accordance with � 1.1157(b) of this chapter. (...continued from previous page) (continued....) Federal Communications Commission FCC 06-102 Federal Communications Commission FCC 06-102 � �@��� �@��� � $ 6 y �
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-131A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-131A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-131A1.txt
  • Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C. 20554 In the Matter of Amendment of the Schedule of Application Fees Set Forth In Sections 1.1102 through 1.1107 of the Commission's Rules ) ) ) ) ) ) GEN Docket No. 86-285 ORDER Adopted: August 30, 2006 Released: September 6, 2006 By the Commission: 1. By this Order, the Commission makes rule changes to Part 1 of the Commission's rules, as listed in Appendix A, and amends its Schedule of Application Fees, 47 C.F.R. � 1.1102
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-52A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-52A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-52A1.txt
  • its designated agents, for the term of the license, the lists, summaries, dates, and copies of agreements and arrangements required to be provided to the Commission pursuant to this section. (c) Application fees. The application reporting the eligibility event will be treated as a transfer of control for purposes of determining the applicable application fees as set forth in � 1.1102. (d) Streamlined approval procedures. (1) The eligibility event application will be placed on public notice once the application is sufficiently complete and accepted for filing (see � 1.933). (2) Petitions to deny filed in accordance with � 309(d) of the Communications Act must comply with the provisions of � 1.939, except that such petitions must be filed no later than
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-140A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-140A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-140A1.txt
  • advance for the entire license term. Therefore, the annual fee amount shown in this table that is a small fee (categories 1 through 5) must be multiplied by the 5- or 10-year license term, as appropriate, to arrive at the total amount of regulatory fees owed. It should be further noted that application fees may also apply as detailed in �1.1102 of this chapter. These are standard fees that are to be paid in accordance with � 1.1157(b) of this chapter. These are standard fees that are to be paid in accordance with � 1.1157(b) of this chapter. (...continued from previous page) (continued....) Federal Communications Commission FCC 07-140 Federal Communications Commission FCC 07-140 � �@��� �@��� �@��� ! # $ ?
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-182A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-182A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-182A1.txt
  • advance for the entire license term. Therefore, the annual fee amount shown in this table that is a small fee (categories 1 through 5) must be multiplied by the 5- or 10-year license term, as appropriate, to arrive at the total amount of regulatory fees owed. It should be further noted that application fees may also apply as detailed in �1.1102 of this chapter. These are standard fees that are to be paid in accordance with � 1.1157(b) of this chapter. These are standard fees that are to be paid in accordance with � 1.1157(b) of this chapter. (continued....) Federal Communications Commission FCC 08-182 Federal Communications Commission FCC 08-182 Federal Communications Commission FCC No. 08-182 Federal Communications Commission FCC No. 08-182
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-209A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-209A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-209A1.txt
  • Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C. 20554 In the Matter of Amendment of the Schedule of Application Fees Set Forth In Sections 1.1102 through 1.1109 of the Commission's Rules ) ) ) ) ) ) GEN Docket No. 86-285 ORDER Adopted: September 15, 2008 Released: September 22, 2008 By the Commission: By this Order, the Commission makes rule changes to Part 1 of the Commission's rules, as listed in Appendix A, and amends its Schedule of Application Fees, 47 C.F.R. � 1.1102 et
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-278A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-278A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-278A1.txt
  • Report and Order at �28. See Unlicensed Operation in the TV Broadcast Bands, ET Docket No. 04-186, Second Report and Order and Memorandum Opinion and Order, FCC 08-260, November 14, 2008 (Unlicensed Operation in the TV Broadcast Bands). See, e.g., 47 C.F.R. �� 74.703, 74.709, 90.303. See 47 C.F.R. � 73.3540(e). See 47 C.F.R. � 73.3572(a)(2). See 47 C.F.R. � 1.1102. See 47 C.F.R. � 73.3572(a). See 47 C.F.R. � 74.735. See 47 C.F.R. � 74.736. See 47 C.F.R � 74.791. See 47 C.F.R. � 74.734. See 47 C.F.R. � 74.763. See 47 C.F.R. � 73.3598. We delegate to the Media Bureau authority to announce the exact date that applications for replacement translator stations will begin to be accepted and the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-09-62A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-09-62A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-09-62A1.txt
  • advance for the entire license term. Therefore, the annual fee amount shown in this table that is a small fee (categories 1 through 5) must be multiplied by the 5- or 10-year license term, as appropriate, to arrive at the total amount of regulatory fees owed. It should be further noted that application fees may also apply as detailed in �1.1102 of this chapter. These are standard fees that are to be paid in accordance with � 1.1157(b) of this chapter. These are standard fees that are to be paid in accordance with � 1.1157(b) of this chapter. (continued....) Federal Communications Commission FCC 09-62 Federal Communications Commission FCC 09-62 5 ^ � � � � 4 5 7 8 ] ^
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-09-64A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-09-64A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-09-64A1.txt
  • (supports SIA Comments); Hughes Reply at 1 (endorses SIA Comments). General Dynamics Comments at 62-63. General Dynamics Comments at 63. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.1107, Schedule of Charges for Applications and Other Filings for the International Services (Item 6.a, $9,330 VSAT blanket license fee for initial application). See also Amendment of the Schedule of Application Fees Set Forth in Sections 1.1102 through 1.1109 of the Commission's Rules, GEN Docket 86-285, Order, FCC 08-209, 23 FCC Rcd 14192, 14229, Appendix B (2008). The appropriate block on Form 312 is on the Main Form at question 25(g), ``other,'' under ``Type of Station.'' See supra note 368. See also 47 C.F.R. � 1.1107 (Item 3.a, $2,530/individual FSS transmit/receive earth station filing fee for initial
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-106A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-106A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-106A1.txt
  • channel pairs (462/467.550, 462/467.575, 462/467.600, 462/467.625, 462/467.650, 462/467.675, 462/467.700, and 462/467.725 MHz), and seven interstitial or split GMRS frequencies (462.5625, 462.5875, 462.6125, 462.6375, 462.6625, 462.6875 and 462.7125 MHz) which are shared with the FRS channels. See 47 C.F.R. � 95.7. If the Commission licenses GMRS by rule, we would delete GMRS from the Commission's Application and Regulatory Fee Schedules, sections 1.1102 and 1.1152, respectively. See 47 C.F.R. �� 1.1102, 1.1152. 47 C.F.R. � 95.119. See 47 C.F.R. � 95.105. See, e.g., 1998 Biennial Regulatory Review -- 47 C.F.R. Part 90 - Private Land Mobile Radio Services, WT Docket No. 98-182, RM-9222, Replacement of Part 90 by Part 88 to Revise the Private Land Mobile Radio Services and Modify the Policies Governing
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-106A1_Rcd.pdf
  • the individual licensing requirement is maintained for GMRS. 2. Eligibility 29.Under the current GMRS rules, only individuals who are 18 or older are eligible to obtain a GMRS license.61An individual's family members of all ages may operate GMRS stations and units 56If the Commission licenses GMRS by rule, we would delete GMRS from the Commission'sApplication and Regulatory Fee Schedules, sections 1.1102 and 1.1152, respectively. See47 C.F.R. �� 1.1102, 1.1152. 5747 C.F.R. � 95.119. 58See47 C.F.R. � 95.105. 59See, e.g.,1998 Biennial Regulatory Review --47 C.F.R. Part 90 -Private Land Mobile Radio Services, WT Docket No. 98-182, RM-9222, Replacement of Part 90 by Part 88 to Revise the Private Land Mobile Radio Services and Modify the Policies Governing Them, PR Docket No. 92-235,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-123A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-123A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-123A1.txt
  • advance for the entire license term. Therefore, the annual fee amount shown in this table that is a small fee (categories 1 through 5) must be multiplied by the 5- or 10-year license term, as appropriate, to arrive at the total amount of regulatory fees owed. It should be further noted that application fees may also apply as detailed in �1.1102 of this chapter. These are standard fees that are to be paid in accordance with � 1.1157(b) of this chapter. These are standard fees that are to be paid in accordance with � 1.1157(b) of this chapter. (continued....) Federal Communications Commission FCC 10-123 Federal Communications Commission FCC 10-123 % 9 ` � � � � $ % ' ( 8
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-192A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-192A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-192A1.txt
  • profit or not-for-profit, organizations. . For individuals, the TIN is their social security number. See 47 U.S.C. � 159 and Assessment and Collection of Regulatory Fees for Fiscal Year 2009, MD Docket No. 09-65, Report and Order, 4 FCC Rcd 10301 (2009) (regulatory fees); 47 U.S.C. � 158 and Amendment of the Schedule of Application Fees Set Forth in Sections 1.1102 through 1.1107 of the Commission's Rules, GEN Docket No. 86-285, Order, 23 FCC Rcd 14192 (2008) (application fees). See, e.g., 47 U.S.C. � 503; 47 C.F.R. � 1.80; see also Forfeiture Policy Statement and Amendment of Section 1.80 of the Rules to Incorporate the Forfeiture Guidelines, CI Docket No. 95-6, Report and Order, 12 FCC Rcd 17087 (1997), recon. denied,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-114A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-114A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-114A1.txt
  • in advance for the entire license term. Therefore, the annual fee amount shown in this table that is a small fee (categories 1 through 5) must be multiplied by the 5-or 10-year license term, as appropriate, to arrive at the total amount of regulatory fees owed. It should be further noted that application fees may also apply as detailed in �1.1102 of this chapter. These are standard fees that are to be paid in accordance with � 1.1157(b) of this chapter. These are standard fees that are to be paid in accordance with � 1.1157(b) of this chapter. (continued....) Federal Communications Commission FCC 11-114 Federal Communications Commission FCC 11-114 $ + T `` � � � * + - . S
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-27A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-27A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-27A1.txt
  • Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit � � � � � � Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C. 20554 In the Matter of Amendment of the Schedule of Application Fees Set Forth In Sections 1.1102 through 1.1109 of the Commission's Rules ) ) ) ) ) ) GEN Docket No. 86-285 ORDER AND NOTICE OF PROPOSED RULEMAKING Adopted: February 28, 2011 Released: March 3, 2011 Comment Date: [15 days after date of publication in the Federal Register] Reply Comment Date: [30 days after date of publication in the Federal Register] By the Commission: By this
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-98A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-98A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-98A1.txt
  • Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit � Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C. 20554 In the Matter of Amendment of the Schedule of Application Fees Set Forth In Sections 1.1102 through 1.1109 of the Commission's Rules ) ) ) ) ) ) GEN Docket No. 86-285 SECOND ORDER Adopted: June 17, 2011 Released: June 20, 2011 By the Commission: In the Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (``NPRM'') in this proceeding, we proposed to clarify the rules on payment of post-auction long-form filing fees by winning bidders in auctions of construction permits
• http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/International/Orders/1999/fcc99051.pdf http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/International/Orders/1999/fcc99051.txt http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/International/Orders/1999/fcc99051.wp
  • changes in the Consumer Price Index). 127 DT Comments at 4; GTE Comments at 5; MCI Comments at 7; Primus Comments at 5; Tyco Comments at 5; AT&T Reply Comments at 6. 128 Tyco Comments at 5�6. 129 WorldCom Comments at 4. 130 DoD Comments at 7. 131 See Amendment of the Schedule of Application Fees Set Forth in Sections 1.1102 through 1.1107 of the Commission's Rules, GEN Docket No. 86-285, Order, FCC 98-87 (rel. May 15, 1998). 28 Federal Communications Commission FCC 99-51 application fees for a common carrier submarine cable to $12,975. We believe that the fact that the total fees are the same is not happenstance, but is a good indication of congressional intent that the application fees
• http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/OMD/Orders/fcc00240.doc http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/OMD/Orders/fcc00240.pdf http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/OMD/Orders/fcc00240.txt
  • 31, 1999. Note that "small fees" are collected in advance for the entire license term. Therefore, the annual fee amount shown in this table must be multiplied by the 5- or 10-year license term, as appropriate, to arrive at the total amount of regulatory fees owed. It should be further noted that application fees may also apply as detailed in �1.1102 of this chapter. 5 U.S.C. 603. The RFA, 5 U.S.C. 601 et. seq., has been amended by the Contract With America Advancement Act of 1996, Public Law No. 104-121, 110 Stat. 847 (1996) (CWAAA). Title II of the CWAAA is the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996 (SBREFA). 5 U.S.C. 603(b)(3). Id. 601(6). 5 U.S.C. 601(3) (incorporating by
• http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/OMD/Orders/fcc00286.pdf
  • Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Before the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20554 FCC 00-286 In the Matter of ) Amendment of the Schedule ) of Application Fees Set ) GEN Docket No. 86-285 Forth in Sections 1.1102 ) through 1.1107 of the ) Commission's Rules ) ORDER Adopted: August 2, 2000 Released: August 4, 2000 By the Commission: 1. By this action, the Commission amends its Schedule of Application Fees, 47 C.F.R. Section 1.1102 et seq., to adjust the fees for processing applications and other filings. Section 8(b) of the Communications Act, as amended, requires that the
• http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/OMD/Orders/fcc01196.doc http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/OMD/Orders/fcc01196.pdf http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/OMD/Orders/fcc01196.txt
  • request that is not filed as a separate pleading will not be considered by the Commission. Requests for deferral of a fee payment for financial hardship must be accompanied by supporting documentation. Petitions and applications for review submitted with a fee must be submitted to the Commission's lockbox bank at the address for the appropriate service set forth in sections 1.1102 through 1.1105 of this subpart. If no fee payment is submitted, the request should be filed with the Commission's Secretary. * * * * * 3. Section 1.1152 is revised to read as follows: � 1.1152 Schedule of annual regulatory fees and filing locations for wireless radio services. Exclusive use services (per license) Fee Amount Address 1. Land Mobile (Above
• http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Notices/1998/fcc98025.pdf http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Notices/1998/fcc98025.txt http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Notices/1998/fcc98025.wp
  • all Wireless Radio Services). 1.972 Grants by random selection (deleted per Balanced No new rule Budget Act of 1997). 1.973 Designation for hearing (renumbered and combined with 1.945 other rules into new consolidated rule for all Wireless Radio Services). Station files. 1.911 Duty to respond to official communications. 1.951 1.981 Reports, annual and semi-annual (revised to reflect 1.981 electronic filing). 1.1102 Schedule of charges for applications and other filings in 1.1102 the wireless telecommunications services (change form number to reflect ULS forms). Federal Communications Commission FCC 98-25 C-4 1.1111 Filing locations (change to allow electronic filing of 1.1111 applications and other filings with attached fees via ULS). 1.1152 Schedule of annual regulatory fees and filing locations 1.1152 for wireless radio services
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2007/FCC-07-125A1.html
  • at Law, to Dana Leavitt, Special Counsel, Investigations and Hearings Division, Enforcement Bureau, Federal Communications Commission, dated January 25, 2007, at 1, 13, 16 ("Second LOI Response"). Charles Guskey, a former business colleague of Bishop, served as an outside accountant to Continental Wireless Cable Television, Inc. Daniel R. Goodman, Receiver; Dr. Robert Chan, Petition for Waiver of Sections 90.633(c) and 1.1102 of the Commission's Rules, Memorandum Opinion and Order and Order on Reconsideration, 13 FCC Rcd 21944 (1998); pet. for review denied, Daniel Goodman v. FCC, 182 F.3d 987 (D.C. Cir. 1999). See Applications of Preferred Communication Systems, Inc., Order, 14 FCC Rcd 20,648 (WTB 1999). See Preferred Acquisitions Inc., FCC Form 175, dated July 17, 2000, at Exhibit A, at
• http://transition.fcc.gov/fees/appfees.html
  • Applications and Other Filings. Order FCC 08-209: [52]Word | [53]Acrobat 9/6/06 Amendment of the Schedule of Application Fees. Order FCC-06-131: [54]Word | [55]Acrobat 8/2/04 Amendment of the Schedule of Application Fees. Erratum: [56]Word | [57]Acrobat 6/25/04 Amendment of the Schedule of Application Fees. Order FCC-04-150: [58]Word | [59]Acrobat 10/18/02 Amendment of the Schedule of Application Fees Set Forth in Section 1.1102 through 1.1107 of the Commission's Rules. Order FCC 02-290: [60]Text | [61]Word | [62]Acrobat 7/12/02 Amendment of the Schedule of Application Fees Set Forth in Section 1.1102 through 1.1107 of the Commission's Rules. Order FCC 02-202: [63]Text | [64]Word | [65]Acrobat Ammended Schedule of Application Fees: [66]Text | [67]Excel | [68]Acrobat 8/4/00 Amendment of the Schedule of Application Fees. Order
• http://transition.fcc.gov/fees/da022513.html
  • media information 202 / 418-0500 Fax-On-Demand 202 / 418-2830 Internet: http://www.fcc.gov ftp.fcc.gov __________________________________________________________________ DA 02-2513 October 4, 2002 FCC Suspends Collection of the July 2002 Amended Schedule of Application Fees; July 2000 Schedule of Application Fees Continues In Effect Until Further Notice By this Notice, we are suspending the collection of the increase in application fees set forth in Section 1.1102 through 1.1107 of the Commissions Rules, 47 C.F.R. 1.1102 1.1107, announced in the Commissions Order of July 12, 2002, GEN Docket No. 86-285, FCC 02-202. Filings requiring application fees should continue to tender the fees as set forth in the Schedule of Application Fees, GEN Docket No. 86-285, FCC 00-286 (2000), posted at [1]www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/OMD/Orders/fcc00286.pdf, until further notice. This action is
• http://transition.fcc.gov/ftp/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Databases/documents_collection/97-290.doc http://transition.fcc.gov/ftp/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Databases/documents_collection/97-290.pdf
  • height of the antenna radiation center would cause the HAAT to increase to 152 meters, thus exceeding maximum permitted Class B facilities. Thus, the station would be compelled to reduce ERP to compensate for this minimal change. Effective September 12, 1996, this filing fee was increased to $690.00. See Amendment of the Schedule of Application Fees Set Forth in Sections 1.1102 through 1.1107, Gen. Docket 86-285, 11 FCC Rcd 10231, 61 Fed. Reg. 41967 (August 13, 1996), released August 7, 1996. The Tables of Allotments are contained in 47 C.F.R Section 73.202(b) for FM commercial radio and 47 C.F.R. Section 73.606(b) for television. The Notice's 47 C.F.R. Section 73.1690(c)(8) was changed to 73.1690(c)(9) to accommodate additional rule changes adopted by this
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/00a/releases/fc990239.pdf http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/00a/releases/fc990239.txt http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/00a/releases/fc990239.wp
  • (3) Modification of license. A licensee may modify a license to: (i) change the carrier status authorized; or (ii) add to the status authorized in order to obtain both common carrier and private status in a single license. Applications to change, or add to, carrier status in a license must be submitted on FCC Form 601 in accordance with Section 1.1102 of this chapter. (4) Pre-existing licenses. Licenses issued before [effective date of rules] are authorized to provide services on a private basis. Licensees may modify this initial status pursuant to Paragraph (a)(3) of this Section. (b) An applicant or licensee may submit a petition at any time requesting clarification of the regulatory status required to provide a specific communications service.
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/02/releases/fc980228.pdf http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/02/releases/fc980228.txt http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/02/releases/fc980228.wp
  • (3) Modification of license. A licensee may modify a license to: (i) change the carrier status authorized; or (ii) add to the status authorized in order to obtain both common carrier and private status in a single license. Applications to change, or add to, carrier status in a license must be submitted on FCC Form 601 in accordance with � 1.1102 of this chapter. (b) An applicant or licensee may submit a petition at any time requesting clarification of the regulatory status required to provide a specific communications service. * * * * * 6. Section 95.811, paragraph (d) would be removed, and paragraphs (b) and (c) would be revised to read as follows: � 95.811 License requirements. (a) * *
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/02/releases/smo96330.pdf http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/02/releases/smo96330.txt http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/02/releases/smo96330.wp
  • Form 600, and must be submitted to the Federal Communications Commission, Interactive Video and Data Service, P.O. Box 358365, Pittsburgh, PA 15251-5365. Each application for a CTS license 37 where the CTS antenna exceeds 6.1m (20 feet) (see � 95.811(b)) must be made on a separate FCC Form 574, and must be submitted to the address set forth in � 1.1102 of the Commission's Rules. * * * * * (d) * * * (2) A completed application (FCC Form 600). * * * * * (f) * * * (3) A separate application (FCC Form 600) for each CTS that is being added or modified. * * * * * 3. Section 95.816 is amended by revising paragraphs (c)(1), (c)(2),
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/18/releases/220_e.pdf
  • and put in pending status. If not, they will be dismissed. (2) Except as otherwise provided in this section, all applications in pending status will be processed in the order in which they are received, determined by the date on which the application was received by the Commission in its Gettysburg, Pennsylvania office (or the address set forth at Section 1.1102 of this chapter for applications requiring the fees established by part 1, subpart G of this chapter). (3) Each application that is accepted for filing will then be reviewed to determine whether it can be granted. Frequencies will be assigned by the Commission pursuant to the provisions of Section 90.723. (4) An application which is dismissed will lose its place
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/18/releases/fc970057.pdf http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/18/releases/fc970057.txt http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/18/releases/fc970057.wp
  • and put in pending status. If not, they will be dismissed. (2) Except as otherwise provided in this section, all applications in pending status will be processed in the order in which they are received, determined by the date on which the application was received by the Commission in its Gettysburg, Pennsylvania office (or the address set forth at Section 1.1102 of this chapter for applications requiring the fees established by part 1, subpart G of this chapter). (3) Each application that is accepted for filing will then be reviewed to determine whether it can be granted. Frequencies will be assigned by the Commission pursuant to the provisions of Section 90.723. (4) An application which is dismissed will lose its place
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/20/releases/fc970217.pdf http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/20/releases/fc970217.txt http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/20/releases/fc970217.wp
  • that both base and mobile operations should be permitted under a single license. For example, a marina may wish to operate a fixed station from its business office, and additionally need to contact incoming boats using hand-held Federal Communications Commission FCC 97-217 The present fee for private coast station and marine utility station licenses is $105. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.1102; 148 Assessment and Collection of Regulatory Fees for Fiscal Year 1995 and Price Cap Treatment of Regulatory Fees Imposed by Section 9 of the Act, MD Docket No. 95-3, Report and Order, 10 FCC Rcd 13512 (1995). See CMRS Flexibility First Report and Order, 11 FCC Rcd at 8965. 149 Coast station transmitters must meet a 5 parts per million
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/24/releases/pt1_pt90.pdf http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/24/releases/pt1_pt90.wp
  • and put in pending status. If not, they will be dismissed. (2) Except as otherwise provided in this section, all applications in pending status will be processed in the order in which they are received, determined by the date on which the application was received by the Commission in its Gettysburg, Pennsylvania office (or the address set forth at � 1.1102 of this chapter for applications requiring the fees established by part 1, subpart G of this chapter). (3) Each application that is accepted for filing will then be reviewed to determine whether it can be granted. Frequencies will be assigned by the Commission pursuant to the provisions of � 90.723. (4) An application which is dismissed will lose its place
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/26/releases/fc990098.pdf http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/26/releases/fc990098.txt http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/26/releases/fc990098.wp
  • to avoid mutual exclusivity, while mutual exclusivity could be avoided through Federal Communications Commission FCC 99-98 Metrocall Petition at 7; PageNet October 27, 1998 Ex Parte at 1; PRTC Reply at 3. 102 Metrocall Petition at 10-11; see Advanced Petition at 4. 103 See, e.g., Daniel R. Goodman, Receiver, Dr. Robert Chan, Petition for Waiver of Sections 90.633(c) and 104 1.1102 of the Commission's Rules, Memorandum Opinion and Order and Order on Reconsideration, 13 FCC Rcd 21944 (1998). See infra �� 66-70. 105 20 "threshold qualifications," identified in their percent-of-coverage proposals. Finally, Metrocall asserts 102 that despite the "overwhelming support for granting geographic [area] licenses to incumbents," and because the Commission has "failed to provide any factual basis" for its decision
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/40/releases/da010850.doc http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/40/releases/da010850.pdf http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/40/releases/da010850.txt
  • at 1-4, BSC Reply at 1-3; CCSC Reply at 1-3. Id. See, generally, Rule Comment and ACE Comment. Rule Comment at 2. BLP Group Comment at 7. Rule Comment at 3. ACE Comment at 2. Conestoga Reply at 4. Ryder Reply at 3; BSC Reply at 3; CCSC Reply at 3. See Ryder Reply at 3-4. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.1102. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.1107(c). Due to rounding, the defined increment only will approximate the percentage being used. The following formula uses twenty percent (20%) to calculate the actual dollar amount of the defined increment for licenses where there is a standing high bid. Defined increment = Rounded (Standing High Bid*1.2) - Standing High Bid. If there is no standing
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/61/comments/HavTvlAclThlfiled2.pdf
  • below. 3. The PSI "Comments" are an unauthorized filing with respect to a restricted proceeding-the PSI Petition for Reconsideration related to Auction 57-as its Counsel knows full well. PSI served a copy of its "Comments" on the Replying Parties not as a favor but because its nominal "comments" on the Auction 61 Public Notice were actually a "presentation" under Section 1.1102 (a communication directed to merits or outcome of a proceeding) on PSI's Page 4 Petition for Reconsideration to attempt to undo Auction 57. If not so copied they would be an impermissible ex parte communication under that Section. Since its "Comments" were actually a further brief on PSI's Petition for Reconsideration, PSI had to file that brief in that proceeding
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/uls/releases/da00-1992.doc http://wireless.fcc.gov/uls/releases/da00-1992.pdf
  • 902-928 MHz Location Wideband (Grandfathered AVM) that were previously licensed as Land Mobile Radiolocation (RS) as follows: Former Radio Service Code Description New Radio Service Code Description RS Land Mobile Radiolocation RS Land Mobile Radiolocation LN 902-928 MHz Location Narrowband (Non-Multilateration) LW 902-928 MHz Location Wideband (Grandfathered AVM) Application Fees Applicants using ULS remain subject to application fees under Section 1.1102 of the rules, 47 CFR � 1.1102. ULS, however, will simplify the process of submitting fees to the Commission. When an applicant submits an application electronically, ULS will assign a file number and show the correct fee amount due and the payment type code on a confirmation screen. Clicking on the ``Form 159'' button will display an FCC 159 Form
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/uls/releases/da00-2292.doc http://wireless.fcc.gov/uls/releases/da00-2292.pdf
  • applications using ULS. The FCC will input these applicants' Form 900 Renewal Application into ULS within a few days after implementation of the Phase II Services. Beginning October 24, 2000, Electronic Form 900 software can no longer be used by applicants to file renewals for Phase II services. Application Fees Applicants using ULS remain subject to application fees under Section 1.1102 of the rules, 47 CFR � 1.1102. ULS, however, will simplify the process of submitting fees to the FCC. When applicants submit an application electronically, ULS will assign a file number and show the correct fee amount due and the payment type code on a confirmation screen. Clicking on the ``Form 159'' button will display an FCC 159 Form with
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/uls/releases/da00-2439.doc http://wireless.fcc.gov/uls/releases/da00-2439.pdf
  • use the most current edition of this form, which is October 1997. Use of this form for Ship applications is permitted only until May 20, 2001. Any pre-ULS form or letter request submitted after May 20, 2001, for this service will be dismissed without prejudice. Application Fees Applicants using ULS to file electronically remain subject to application fees under Section 1.1102 of the rules, Section 47 CFR � 1.1102. ULS, however, will simplify the process of submitting fees to the FCC and greatly reduce the potential for applicants to submit insufficient fees. When applicants submit their application online, ULS will assign a file number and show the correct fee amount due and the payment type code on a confirmation screen. Clicking
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/uls/releases/da00-2564.doc http://wireless.fcc.gov/uls/releases/da00-2564.pdf
  • applications using ULS. The FCC will input these applicants' Form 900 Renewal Application into ULS within a few days after implementation of the Phase III Services. Beginning December 4, 2000, Electronic Form 900 software can no longer be used by applicants to file renewals for Phase III services. Application Fees Applicants using ULS remain subject to application fees under Section 1.1102 of the rules, 47 CFR � 1.1102. ULS, however, will simplify the process of submitting fees to the FCC. When applicants submit an application electronically, ULS will assign a file number and show the correct fee amount due and the payment type code on a confirmation screen. Selecting the ``Form 159'' button will display an FCC 159 Form with pre-filled
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/uls/releases/da00270.doc http://wireless.fcc.gov/uls/releases/da00270.pdf
  • each FCC Form 610B you submit. Applications that do not include this additional information are subject to dismissal. Once you have received your Club call sign, you may apply online for a Club vanity call sign. Application Fees (Vanity Call Sign applications) Amateur Service applicants filing vanity call sign applications in ULS remain subject to existing application fees under Section 1.1102 of the rules, 47 CFR �1.1102. ULS, however, will simplify the process of submitting fees to the Commission. When an applicant submits an application electronically, ULS will assign a file number and show the fee amount due and the payment type code on a confirmation screen. Where to Send Payments for Electronically-filed Applications Filers are urged to make payments electronically.
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/uls/releases/da010971.doc http://wireless.fcc.gov/uls/releases/da010971.pdf
  • letter 90 days before license expiration. This renewal reminder letter is provided as a courtesy, and failure to receive a reminder will not serve as a basis for reinstatement of an expired license. Applications for renewal may be filed no earlier than 90 days prior to expiration date. Application Fees Applicants using ULS remain subject to application fees under Section 1.1102 of the rules, 47 CFR � 1.1102. ULS, however, will simplify the process of submitting fees to the Commission. When an applicant submits an application electronically, ULS will assign a file number and show the correct fee amount due and the payment type code on a confirmation screen. Clicking on the ``Form 159'' button will display an FCC 159 Form
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/uls/releases/da991455.doc http://wireless.fcc.gov/uls/releases/da991455.pdf
  • 16, you must provide the EIN or FCC-generated ID number and other information specified in Appendix A on each FCC Form 610B you submit. Applications that do not include this information are subject to dismissal. V. APPLICATION FEES (Vanity Call Sign applications) Amateur Service applicants filing vanity call sign applications in ULS remain subject to existing application fees under Section 1.1102 of the rules, 47 CFR � 1.1102. ULS, however, will simplify the process of submitting fees to the Commission. When an applicant submits an application electronically, ULS will assign a file number and show the correct fee amount due and the payment type code on a confirmation screen. Clicking on the ``Form 159'' button will pre-fill this information on the
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/uls/releases/da991543.doc http://wireless.fcc.gov/uls/releases/da991543.pdf
  • is filed; filers do not need to specify receive coordinates. Additionally, DEMS and MAS applicants may choose an Antenna Structure Type of ``N/A - Not Applicable'' to describe the antenna structure at their receive sites. Current DEMS and MAS licenses will be converted to reflect these conventions. Application Fees Applicants using ULS remain subject to existing application fees under Section 1.1102 of the rules, 47 CFR � 1.1102. ULS, however, will simplify the process of submitting fees to the Commission. When an applicant submits an application electronically, ULS will assign a file number and show the correct fee amount due and the payment type code on a confirmation screen. Clicking on the ``Form 159'' button will pre-fill this information on the
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/uls/releases/da992419.doc http://wireless.fcc.gov/uls/releases/da992419.pdf
  • is filed; filers do not need to specify receive coordinates. Additionally, DEMS and MAS applicants may choose an Antenna Structure Type of ``N/A - Not Applicable'' to describe the antenna structure at their receive sites. Current DEMS and MAS licenses will be converted to reflect these conventions. Application Fees Applicants using ULS remain subject to existing application fees under Section 1.1102 of the rules, 47 CFR � 1.1102. ULS, however, will simplify the process of submitting fees to the Commission. When an applicant submits an application electronically, ULS will assign a file number and show the correct fee amount due and the payment type code on a confirmation screen. Clicking on the ``Form 159'' button will pre-fill this information on the
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/International/Orders/1999/fcc99051.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/International/Orders/1999/fcc99051.txt http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/International/Orders/1999/fcc99051.wp
  • changes in the Consumer Price Index). 127 DT Comments at 4; GTE Comments at 5; MCI Comments at 7; Primus Comments at 5; Tyco Comments at 5; AT&T Reply Comments at 6. 128 Tyco Comments at 5�6. 129 WorldCom Comments at 4. 130 DoD Comments at 7. 131 See Amendment of the Schedule of Application Fees Set Forth in Sections 1.1102 through 1.1107 of the Commission's Rules, GEN Docket No. 86-285, Order, FCC 98-87 (rel. May 15, 1998). 28 Federal Communications Commission FCC 99-51 application fees for a common carrier submarine cable to $12,975. We believe that the fact that the total fees are the same is not happenstance, but is a good indication of congressional intent that the application fees
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Miscellaneous/Orders/1999/fcc99146.pdf
  • Secretary 50 Note that "small fees" are collected in advance for the entire license term. Therefore, the annual fee amount shown in this table must be multiplied by the 5- or 10-year license term, as appropriate, to arrive at the total amount of regulatory fees owed. It should be further noted that application fees may also apply as detailed in �1.1102 of this chapter. 24 RULE CHANGES For the reasons discussed in the preamble, part 1 of Title 47 of the Code of Federal Regulations is amended as follows: PART 1 - PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE 1. The authority citation for Part 1 continues to read as follows: Authority: 15 U.S.C. 79 et seq.; 47 U.S.C. 151, 154(i), 154(j), 155, 225, and
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/OMD/Orders/fcc00240.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/OMD/Orders/fcc00240.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/OMD/Orders/fcc00240.txt
  • 31, 1999. Note that "small fees" are collected in advance for the entire license term. Therefore, the annual fee amount shown in this table must be multiplied by the 5- or 10-year license term, as appropriate, to arrive at the total amount of regulatory fees owed. It should be further noted that application fees may also apply as detailed in �1.1102 of this chapter. 5 U.S.C. 603. The RFA, 5 U.S.C. 601 et. seq., has been amended by the Contract With America Advancement Act of 1996, Public Law No. 104-121, 110 Stat. 847 (1996) (CWAAA). Title II of the CWAAA is the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996 (SBREFA). 5 U.S.C. 603(b)(3). Id. 601(6). 5 U.S.C. 601(3) (incorporating by
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/OMD/Orders/fcc00286.pdf
  • Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Before the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20554 FCC 00-286 In the Matter of ) Amendment of the Schedule ) of Application Fees Set ) GEN Docket No. 86-285 Forth in Sections 1.1102 ) through 1.1107 of the ) Commission's Rules ) ORDER Adopted: August 2, 2000 Released: August 4, 2000 By the Commission: 1. By this action, the Commission amends its Schedule of Application Fees, 47 C.F.R. Section 1.1102 et seq., to adjust the fees for processing applications and other filings. Section 8(b) of the Communications Act, as amended, requires that the
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/OMD/Orders/fcc01196.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/OMD/Orders/fcc01196.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/OMD/Orders/fcc01196.txt
  • request that is not filed as a separate pleading will not be considered by the Commission. Requests for deferral of a fee payment for financial hardship must be accompanied by supporting documentation. Petitions and applications for review submitted with a fee must be submitted to the Commission's lockbox bank at the address for the appropriate service set forth in sections 1.1102 through 1.1105 of this subpart. If no fee payment is submitted, the request should be filed with the Commission's Secretary. * * * * * 3. Section 1.1152 is revised to read as follows: � 1.1152 Schedule of annual regulatory fees and filing locations for wireless radio services. Exclusive use services (per license) Fee Amount Address 1. Land Mobile (Above
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Notices/1998/fcc98025.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Notices/1998/fcc98025.txt http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Notices/1998/fcc98025.wp
  • all Wireless Radio Services). 1.972 Grants by random selection (deleted per Balanced No new rule Budget Act of 1997). 1.973 Designation for hearing (renumbered and combined with 1.945 other rules into new consolidated rule for all Wireless Radio Services). Station files. 1.911 Duty to respond to official communications. 1.951 1.981 Reports, annual and semi-annual (revised to reflect 1.981 electronic filing). 1.1102 Schedule of charges for applications and other filings in 1.1102 the wireless telecommunications services (change form number to reflect ULS forms). Federal Communications Commission FCC 98-25 C-4 1.1111 Filing locations (change to allow electronic filing of 1.1111 applications and other filings with attached fees via ULS). 1.1152 Schedule of annual regulatory fees and filing locations 1.1152 for wireless radio services
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Orders/1999/da992551.doc
  • frequency IS DISMISSED as moot. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, the award of a finder's preference to Supreme Radio Communications, Inc., for frequency 851.1375 MHz, (SMR) Station WPCN273, Sallisaw, OK, IS AFFIRMED. Federal Communications Commission William W. Kunze Deputy Chief, Commercial Wireless Division Wireless Telecommunications Bureau Daniel R. Goodman, Receiver; Dr. Robert Chan Petition for Waiver of Sections 90.633(c) and 1.1102 of the Commission's Rules, Memorandum Opinion and Order, FCC 95-211(rel. May 24, 1995). See Letter from William J. Kellett, Esq., Office of Operations, to Supreme Radio Communications, Inc. dated October 23, 1996 (Office of Operations Decision). Request for Finder's Preference filed November 20, 1995. Risley did not file a petition for reconsideration of the Office of Operations Decision. He also
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Orders/1999/da992793.doc
  • Sharing First Report and Order, 11 FCC Rcd at 8869 � 88. 47 C.F.R. � 101.81. Id. Waiver Request at 4. Id. Duke Power Company at � 7 (citing Cost Sharing Report and Order, 11 FCC Rcd at 8869-70 �� 90-92). Waiver Request at 4-5. Id. Daniel R. Goodman, Receiver, Dr. Robert Chan, Petition for Waiver of Sections 90.633(c) and 1.1102 of the Commission's Rules, Memorandum Opinion & Order and Order on Reconsideration, 13 FCC Rcd 21944, 21972-73 � 53 (1998). Id. at 21973 � 53; accord, e.g., Nevada Power Company, Order on Reconsideration, DA 99-2291, at � 5 (WTB PSPWD rel. October 25, 1999). Waiver Request at 5. See, e.g., Duke Power Company at � 9; Wells Rural Electric Company,
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Orders/2000/da000048.doc
  • Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C. 20554 In the Matter of ) ) George L. Fetrow ) ) Gary Dykhouse ) ) Request for Waiver of Section 1.1102 ) of the Commission's Rules ) ORDER Adopted: January 11, 2000 Released: January 12, 2000 By the Deputy Chief, Policy and Rules Branch, Commercial Wireless Division, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau: . By this Order, we dismiss as moot the requests for a fee waiver filed respectively by George L. Fetrow and Gary Dykhouse (Petitioners) on December 15, 1998 in connection with
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Orders/2000/da000150.doc
  • Petition at 2. Order at �� 11-12. Id. at � 9. Id. at � 8 (citing Fees II, 5 FCC Rcd at 5922-23 �� 25-26). DCT Communications. Inc. Contingent Reply to Opposition to Further Petition for Reconsideration (filed Sept. 26, 1999) (Reply). Further Petition at 3-4. Id. at 4-5. Id. at 5. Id. at 8. Id. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.1102 (1994) (FCC Form 159 not listed as required when filing FCC Form 494); 47 C.F.R. � 1.1108(b) (1994). Altron's arguments to the contrary mischaracterize DCT's position and therefore are without merit. Specifically, Altron states that ``DCT does not dispute that the remittance advice form was still required at the time that DCT filed its application.'' Opposition at 7. As noted
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Orders/2000/da000333.doc
  • Market 354(B)(2), while Saguache Partnership is the licensee of Market 354(B)(1). 47 C.F.R. � 22.912(b), (c). Emergency Request to Rescind Order, filed by Colorado RSA 7(B)(2) Limited Partnership on September 11, 1998 (Emergency Request). We consider this Emergency Request to be a Petition for Reconsideration. See Daniel R. Goodman, Receiver, Dr. Robert Chan Petition for Waiver of Sections 90.633(c) and 1.1102 of the Commission's Rules, Memorandum Opinion and Order on Reconsideration, FCC 98-167, � 26 (July 31, 1998). In addition, the Petition for Reconsideration and Request for Referral to the Commissioners for Treatment as an Application for Review and Request for Expedited Consideration filed on Octover 5, 1998 by Colorado 7 - Saguache Limited Partnership and the Petition for Reconsideration or,
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Orders/2000/da000786.doc
  • 1. Effective November 1, 1999, the Branch granted Compton's request to extend the STA until May 1, 2000. Kay Petition for Reconsideration. 47 C.F.R. � 1.106(b). San Luis Obispo Limited Partnership, Memorandum Opinion and Order and Forfeiture Order, 11 FCC Rcd 9616, 9617 � 4 (1996). Daniel R. Goodman, Receiver; Dr. Robert Chan, Petition for Waiver of Sections 90.633(c) and 1.1102 of the Commission's Rules, Order on Reconsideration, 14 FCC Rcd 20547, 20549 � 4 (1999). See also Application of MCI Communications Corp. and Southern Pacific Telecommunications Corp., Memorandum Opinion and Order, 12 FCC Rcd 7790, 7794 � 11 (1997), aff'd sub nom Microwave Acquisition Corp. v. FCC, 145 F.3d 1410 (D.C. Cir. 1998); Friends of the Earth, Inc. v. Laidlaw
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Orders/2000/da000825.doc
  • � 1.106, the Petition for Reconsideration filed by DCT Communications, Inc. on November 22, 1999 IS DENIED. This action is taken under delegated authority pursuant to Sections 0.131 and 0.331 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.131, 0.331. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Ramona E. Melson Deputy Chief, Public Safety and Private Wireless Division Wireless Telecommunications Bureau See 47 C.F.R. � 1.1102 (1994) (FCC Form 159 is not listed as required when filing FCC Form 494); 47 C.F.R. � 1.108(b) (1994). Altron Communications, L.C., Order on Reconsideration, DA 00-150 (PS&PWD 2000) See Amendment of the Commission's Rules Regarding the 37.0-38.6 GHz and 38.6-40.0 GHz Bands, Report and Order and Second Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, ET Docket No. 95-183, 12 FCC Rcd 18600,
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Orders/2000/da001134.doc
  • Flex R&O). 63 Fed. Reg. 59656 (Nov. 3, 1999). 47 C.F.R. �� 1.949(a), 1.955(a)(1). 47 C.F.R. � 1.925(b)(3). Waiver Request at 1-2. Id. Waiver Order, 14 FCC Rcd at 5194. 218-219 MHz Flex R&O, 15 FCC Rcd at 1517 � 32. See Waiver Request at 1-2. Daniel Goodman, Receiver, Dr. Robert Chan, Petition for Waiver of Sections 90.633 (c) and 1.1102 of the Commission's Rules, Memorandum Opinion & Order and Order on Reconsideration, 13 FCC Rcd 21944, 21973 (1998). See Waiver Order, 14 FCC Rcd at 5190, n.3. See Medina Electric Cooperative, Inc., Order on Reconsideration, DA 99-2314, � 6 (WTB PSPWD rel. Oct. 26, 1999) (granting reinstatement of a 2 GHz license erroneously cancelled by licensee, in part because the
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Orders/2000/da001188.doc
  • of each licensee to renew its license prior to the license's expiration date. ULS MO&O, 14 FCC Rcd at 11155 � 21. Accordingly, ``failure of a licensee to receive a [renewal form] from the Commission is no excuse for failure to file a renewal application.'' See Daniel R. Goodman, Receiver, Dr. Robert Chan, Petition for Waiver of Sections 90.633(c) and 1.1102 of the Commission's Rules, Memorandum Opinion and Order on Reconsideration, 13 FCC Rcd 21944, 21972-73 � 53 (1998); accord, e.g., Nevada Power Company, Order on Reconsideration, DA 99-2291 at � 5 (WTB PSPWD rel. Oct. 25, 1999). Federal Communications Commission DA 00-1188 Federal Communications Commission DA 00-1188 � @& ~ � � � A K � � �
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Orders/2000/da001415.doc
  • and Rules Branch Commercial Wireless Division Wireless Telecommunications Bureau In 1995, the Commission released the Goodman/Chan Order, which, among other things, granted certain General Category Specialized Mobile Radio licensees an additional four months to construct and commence operations of their licenses. See In the Matter of Daniel R. Goodman, Receiver, Dr. Robert Chan, Petition for Waiver of Sections 90.633(c) and 1.1102 of the Commission's rules, Memorandum Opinion and Order, 10 FCC Rcd 8537, 8545 � 20 (1995). We note that none of the Reconsideration Letters specifies the Commission order or action that it is seeking to have reconsidered. It is not certain, therefore, that the Reconsideration Letters comply with section 1.106(f)'s mandate that petitions for reconsideration be filed within 30 days
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Orders/2000/da001416.doc
  • Kunze Deputy Chief, Commercial Wireless Division Wireless Telecommunications Bureau In 1995, the Commission released the Goodman/Chan Order, which, among other things, granted certain General Category Specialized Mobile Radio licensees an additional four months to construct and commence operations of their licenses. See In the Matter of Daniel R. Goodman, Receiver, Dr. Robert Chan, Petition for Waiver of Sections 90.633(c) and 1.1102 of the Commission's Rules, Memorandum Opinion and Order, 10 FCC Rcd 8537, 8545 � 20 (1995) (Goodman/Chan Order). See In re 929 MHz Paging Licenses, Motions for Reconsideration of Waiver Requests of Construction Period, Order on Reconsideration, 14 FCC Rcd 9738 (CWD 1999); In re 929 and 931 MHz Paging Licenses, Motions for Reconsideration of Waiver Requests of Construction Period,
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Orders/2000/da002091.doc
  • 27, 1999). This application included a request for a waiver of Section 101.65 of the Commission's Rules to allow submission of the renewal application thirty days beyond the expiration date of the license. See 47 C.F.R. � 101.65 (1998). Specifically, the applications were addressed to the lockbox that accepts, inter alia, microwave renewal applications, lockbox 358245. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.1102(14). The applications included waiver requests, so WSYX used fee type code PDWM, the code for the waiver fees. See id. Fees bearing code PDWM, however, must be submitted to lockbox 358130, the lockbox for, inter alia, microwave waiver requests, and are not accepted at lockbox 358245. See id. See Public Notice, Report No. 401 (rel. Dec. 15, 1999). See Biennial
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Orders/2000/fcc00051.doc
  • See 47 C.F.R. � 90.139(c) (1992) (Commission processing of applications). See 47 C.F.R. � 1.3 (Suspension, amendment or waiver of rules). See 47 C.F.R. � 90.175 (1992) (Frequency coordination requirements). See 47 C.F.R. �� 90.119(a)(1), 90.119(a)(3) (1992) (FCC Form 574 shall be used to apply for new station authorizations and for modification of an existing authorization). See 47 C.F.R. � 1.1102(6) (Schedule of charges for private radio service, Land Mobile Stations: (a) New, Reinstatement, Modification and/or Renewal (per call sign). As noted above, Interstate's request also was in all events exempt from the public notice, waiting period, and petition to deny provisions of Section 309 of the Act. We note that any dismissal of the modification application, as defective, would have
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Orders/2000/fcc00152.doc
  • and subsequently resubmitted beyond the sixty-day cut-off date established by Altron's application. The Division reinstated the application nunc pro tunc because it determined that Form 159 was superfluous and therefore was not a sufficient basis on which to dismiss an otherwise complete application. Altron contends that the Division, in reaching this conclusion, improperly relied on the tables associated with Section 1.1102 of the Commission's Rules and altered the fee form correction rules and policies affirmed in the Fees II Reconsideration. We disagree. The Division properly applied the rules in force at the time DCT filed its application. Section 1.1102 did not require the filing of Form 159 with applications for new microwave facilities. Further, Section 1.1110 of the Commission's Rules provided,
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Orders/2000/fcc00235.doc
  • 3; Motorola Comments at 4; Blooston Mordkofsky Comments at 2; UTC Comments at 4; PCIA Comments at 3. Motorola Comments at 4. Day Catalano Comments at 3. Day Catalano Comments at 3. LMCC Comments at 4; PCIA Comments at 3. LMCC Comments at 4. LMCC Comments at 4. Motorola Comments at 4. See 47 C.F.R. � 90.149(a). See 47 C.F.R. 1.1102. Notice, 13 FCC Rcd at 21,137. See Motorola Comments at 5; Day Catalano Comments at 4; Blooston Mordkofsky Comments at 2; and UTC Comments at 3. See also PCIA Comments at 4-5. APCO Comments at 2. API Comments at 4. API Reply Comments at 4. 47 C.F.R. � 90.135. For example, Location and Monitoring Service stations (47 C.F.R. � 90.353),
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Public_Notices/1999/da991455.pdf
  • 16, you must provide the EIN or FCC-generated ID number and other information specified in Appendix A on each FCC Form 610B you submit. Applications that do not include this information are subject to dismissal. V. APPLICATION FEES (Vanity Call Sign applications) Amateur Service applicants filing vanity call sign applications in ULS remain subject to existing application fees under Section 1.1102 of the rules, 47 CFR � 1.1102. ULS, however, will simplify the process of submitting fees to the Commission. When an applicant submits an application electronically, ULS will assign a file number and show the correct fee amount due and the payment type code on a confirmation screen. Clicking on the "Form 159" button will pre-fill this information on the
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Public_Notices/1999/da991543.pdf
  • is filed; filers do not need to specify receive coordinates. Additionally, DEMS and MAS applicants may choose an Antenna Structure Type of "N/A � Not Applicable" to describe the antenna structure at their receive sites. Current DEMS and MAS licenses will be converted to reflect these conventions. APPLICATION FEES Applicants using ULS remain subject to existing application fees under Section 1.1102 of the rules, 47 CFR � 1.1102. ULS, however, will simplify the process of submitting fees to the Commission. When an applicant submits an application electronically, ULS will assign a file number and show the correct fee amount due and the payment type code on a confirmation screen. Clicking on the "Form 159" button will pre-fill this information on the
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Public_Notices/1999/da992419.pdf
  • CR or CB during the conversion to ULS, licensees may file database correction requests with the Bureau. Database corrections may be filed manually at the following address: Federal Communications Commission WTB/CWD, Licensing and Technical Analysis Branch 445 12th St., S.W.; TW-A325 Washington, D.C. 20554 ATTN: Pearl McGinnis APPLICATION FEES Applicants using ULS remain subject to existing application fees under Section 1.1102 of the rules, 47 CFR � 1.1102. ULS, however, will simplify the process of submitting fees to the Commission. When an applicant submits an application electronically, ULS will assign a file number and show the correct fee amount due and the payment type code on a confirmation screen. Clicking on the "Form 159" button will pre-fill this information on the
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Public_Notices/2000/da000270.doc
  • each FCC Form 610B you submit. Applications that do not include this additional information are subject to dismissal. Once you have received your Club call sign, you may apply online for a Club vanity call sign. Application Fees (Vanity Call Sign applications) Amateur Service applicants filing vanity call sign applications in ULS remain subject to existing application fees under Section 1.1102 of the rules, 47 CFR �1.1102. ULS, however, will simplify the process of submitting fees to the Commission. When an applicant submits an application electronically, ULS will assign a file number and show the fee amount due and the payment type code on a confirmation screen. Where to Send Payments for Electronically-filed Applications Filers are urged to make payments electronically.
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Public_Notices/2000/da001849.doc
  • Because electronic filing provides for on-line checking of applications, electronic filers are more likely to detect and correct errors before submitting applications, and therefore reduce the risk that their applications will be returned or dismissed. For this reason, the Bureau strongly encourages applicants to choose electronic filing. Application Fees Applicants using ULS remain subject to existing application fees under Section 1.1102 of the rules, 47 CFR � 1.1102. ULS, however, will simplify the process of submitting fees to the Commission. When an applicant submits an application electronically, ULS will assign a file number and show the correct fee amount due and the payment type code on a confirmation screen. Clicking on the ``Form 159'' button will pre-fill this information on the
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Public_Notices/2000/da001992.doc
  • 902-928 MHz Location Wideband (Grandfathered AVM) that were previously licensed as Land Mobile Radiolocation (RS) as follows: Former Radio Service Code Description New Radio Service Code Description RS Land Mobile Radiolocation RS Land Mobile Radiolocation LN 902-928 MHz Location Narrowband (Non-Multilateration) LW 902-928 MHz Location Wideband (Grandfathered AVM) Application Fees Applicants using ULS remain subject to application fees under Section 1.1102 of the rules, 47 CFR � 1.1102. ULS, however, will simplify the process of submitting fees to the Commission. When an applicant submits an application electronically, ULS will assign a file number and show the correct fee amount due and the payment type code on a confirmation screen. Clicking on the ``Form 159'' button will display an FCC 159 Form
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Public_Notices/2000/da002292.doc
  • applications using ULS. The FCC will input these applicants' Form 900 Renewal Application into ULS within a few days after implementation of the Phase II Services. Beginning October 24, 2000, Electronic Form 900 software can no longer be used by applicants to file renewals for Phase II services. Application Fees Applicants using ULS remain subject to application fees under Section 1.1102 of the rules, 47 CFR � 1.1102. ULS, however, will simplify the process of submitting fees to the FCC. When applicants submit an application electronically, ULS will assign a file number and show the correct fee amount due and the payment type code on a confirmation screen. Clicking on the ``Form 159'' button will display an FCC 159 Form with
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Public_Notices/2000/da002439.doc
  • use the most current edition of this form, which is October 1997. Use of this form for Ship applications is permitted only until May 20, 2001. Any pre-ULS form or letter request submitted after May 20, 2001, for this service will be dismissed without prejudice. Application Fees Applicants using ULS to file electronically remain subject to application fees under Section 1.1102 of the rules, Section 47 CFR � 1.1102. ULS, however, will simplify the process of submitting fees to the FCC and greatly reduce the potential for applicants to submit insufficient fees. When applicants submit their application online, ULS will assign a file number and show the correct fee amount due and the payment type code on a confirmation screen. Clicking
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Public_Notices/2000/da002564.doc
  • applications using ULS. The FCC will input these applicants' Form 900 Renewal Application into ULS within a few days after implementation of the Phase III Services. Beginning December 4, 2000, Electronic Form 900 software can no longer be used by applicants to file renewals for Phase III services. Application Fees Applicants using ULS remain subject to application fees under Section 1.1102 of the rules, 47 CFR � 1.1102. ULS, however, will simplify the process of submitting fees to the FCC. When applicants submit an application electronically, ULS will assign a file number and show the correct fee amount due and the payment type code on a confirmation screen. Selecting the ``Form 159'' button will display an FCC 159 Form with pre-filled
• http://www.fcc.gov/Daily_Releases/Daily_Digest/1998/dd980515.html
  • and to substitute Channel 243C3 for Channle 243A at Malone, New York and modify Station WVNV(FM)'s license accordingly; terminated proceeding. Dkt No.: MM- 97-185. Action by Chief, Allocations Branch, Policy and Rules Division, Mass Media Bureau. Adopted: May 6, 1998. by R&O. (DA No. 98-240). MMB Internet URL: [30]http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Orders/1998/da980240.wp AMENDMENT OF THE SCHEDULE OF APPLICATION FEES SET FORTH IN SECTIONS 1.1102 THROUGH 1.1107 OF THE COMMISSION'S RULES. Amended Commission's Schedule of Application Fees, 47 C.F.R. Section 1.1102 et seq., to adjust the fees for processing applications and other filings. Dkt No.: GE-N 86-28. Action by Secretary. Adopted: May 8, 1998. by Order. (FCC No. 98-87). OMD Internet URL: [31]http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Miscellaneous/Orders/1998/fcc98087.wp ADDENDA: The following items, released May 14, 1998, did not appear in
• http://www.fcc.gov/Daily_Releases/Daily_Digest/1998/dd980526.html
  • applications for blanket authorization to operate up to 100,000 mobile satellite earth terminals through Canadian-licensed satellite MSAT-1 throughout the Continental United States, U.S. territories, Alaska, and Hawaii. Action by Chief, Satellite and Radiocommunication Division. Adopted: May 22, 1998. by Order. (DA No. 98-986). IB Internet URL: [12]http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/International/Orders/1998/da980986.wp ERRATUM TO AMENDMENT OF THE SCHEDULE OF APPLICATIONS FEES SET FORTH IN SECTION 1.1102 (WIRELESS SERVICES) OF THE COMMISSION'S RULES. Amended R&O released June 16, 1997. Dkt No.: GN- 86-285. Action by Managing Director. by Erratum. (DA No. 98-982). OMD Internet URL: [13]http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Miscellaneous/Orders/1998/da980982.wp SOUTHERN COMPANY. Granted in part and denied in part the requests of Industrial Telecommunications Association, Inc., Nextel Communications, Inc. and American Mobile Telecommunications, Inc. to extend the deadlines for filing comments
• http://www.fcc.gov/Daily_Releases/Daily_Digest/2002/dd020712.html
  • Part 15 of the regulations with regard to the parties that are eligible to operate ultra-wideband imaging systems, specifically ground penetrating radar (GPR) and wall imaging systems. (Dkt No. 98-153). Action by: Chief, Office of Engineering and Technology. Adopted: 07/12/2002 by ORDER. (DA No. 02-1658). OET [93]DA-02-1658A1.doc [94]DA-02-1658A1.pdf [95]DA-02-1658A1.txt AMENDMENT OF THE SCHEDULE OF APPLICATION FEES SET FORTH IN SECTION 1.1102 THROUGH 1.1107 OF THE COMMISSION'S RULES. Amended Schedule of Application Fees, 47.C.F.R. Section 1.1102 et seq., to adjust the fees for processing applications and other filings. This adjustment is required every two years after October 1, 1991. (Dkt No. 86-285). Action by: the Commission. Adopted: 07/01/2002 by ORDER. (FCC No. 02-202). OMD [96]FCC-02-202A1.doc [97]FCC-02-202A2.xls [98]FCC-02-202A1.pdf [99]FCC-02-202A2.pdf [100]FCC-02-202A1.txt [101]FCC-02-202A2.txt IN THE
• http://www.fcc.gov/Daily_Releases/Daily_Digest/2002/dd021018.html
  • MIDDLEBURG, FL. Dismissed the Petition for Rulemaking filed by Bernice P. Hedrick, and denied the Petition for Rulemaking filed by International Systems Corporation, and terminated the proceeding. (Dkt No. 01-123, 01-177). Action by: Assistant Chief, Audio Division, MB. Adopted: 10/09/2002 by R&O. (DA No. 02-2720). MB [120]DA-02-2720A1.doc [121]DA-02-2720A1.pdf [122]DA-02-2720A1.txt AMENDMENT OF THE SCHEDULE OF APPLICATION FEES SET FORTH IN SECTION 1.1102-1.1107 OF THE COMMISSION'S RULES. Changed the effective date of previous Order in this proceeding. The previous Order was released in July (Application Fee Order. Action by: the Commission. Adopted: 10/16/2002 by ORDER. (FCC No. 02-290). OMD [123]FCC-02-290A1.doc [124]FCC-02-290A1.pdf [125]FCC-02-290A1.txt ESCUELA MANUEL CORCHADO, ISABELA, PUERTO RICO. Dismissed Request for Review without prejudice. (Dkt No. 96-45, 97-21). Action by: Deputy Chief, Telecommunications
• http://www.fcc.gov/Daily_Releases/Daily_Digest/2004/dd040625.html
  • by ERRATUM. (DA No. 04-1756). MB [171]DOC-248780A1.doc [172]DOC-248780A1.pdf [173]DOC-248780A1.txt RECLASSIFICATION OF LICENSE OF STATION WKQL(FM), JACKSONVILLE, FL. Issued Order to Show Cause in this proceeding. By Order to Show Cause. Action by: Assistant Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau. Adopted: 06/23/2004 by ORDER. (DA No. 04-1728). MB [174]DA-04-1728A1.doc [175]DA-04-1728A1.pdf [176]DA-04-1728A1.txt AMENDMENT OF THE SCHEDULE OF APPLICATION FEES SET FORTH IN SECTION 1.1102 THROUGH 1.1107 OF THE COMMISSION'S RULES. Amended the rule changes specified herein be adopted and the Schedule of Application Fees, 47 C.F.R. Section 1.1102 et seq. (Dkt No. 86-285). Action by: the Commission. Adopted: 06/23/2004 by ORDER. (FCC No. 04-150). OMD [177]FCC-04-150A1.doc [178]FCC-04-150A1.pdf [179]FCC-04-150A1.txt PETITION OF QWEST CORPORATION FOR FORBEARANCE PURSUANT TO 47 U.S.C. 160(C) IN THE OMAHA METROPOLITAN STATISTICAL
• http://www.fcc.gov/Daily_Releases/Daily_Digest/2006/dd060906.html
  • its Memorandum Opinion and Order in this proceeding pursuant to Section 1.113(a) of the Commission's Rules. Reinstated the petitions for reconsideration of Southern California Public Radio and Maranatha Ministries of Hemet. Action by: Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau. Adopted: 09/01/2006 by ORDER. (DA No. 06-1766). MB [31]DA-06-1766A1.doc [32]DA-06-1766A1.pdf [33]DA-06-1766A1.txt AMENDMENT OF THE SCHEDULE OF APPLICATION FEES SET FORTH IN SECTIONS 1.1102 THROUGH 1.1107 OF THE COMMISSION'S RULES. Amended its Schedule of Application Fees. (Dkt No. 86-285). Action by: the Commission. Adopted: 08/30/2006 by ORDER. (FCC No. 06-131). OMD [34]FCC-06-131A1.doc [35]FCC-06-131A1.pdf [36]FCC-06-131A1.txt ADDENDA: THE FOLLOWING ITEMS, RELEASED SEPTEMBER 5, 2006, DID NOT APPEAR IN DIGEST NO. 171: ----------------------------------------------------------------------- --- NEWS RELEASES ----------------------------------------------------------------------- --- COMMISSIONER ROBERT M. MCDOWELL ANNOUNCES HIRING OF PERMANENT STAFF.
• http://www.fcc.gov/Daily_Releases/Daily_Digest/2008/dd080922.html
  • Robert.Kenny@fcc.gov [16]DA-08-2126A1.doc [17]DA-08-2126A1.pdf [18]DA-08-2126A1.txt Released: 09/22/2008. TARIFF TRANSMITTAL PUBLIC REFERENCE LOG. WCB. Contact: (202) 418-0270 [19]DOC-285504A1.pdf [20]DOC-285504A1.txt ----------------------------------------------------------------------- --- SPEECHES ----------------------------------------------------------------------- --- REMARKS OF COMMISSIONER JONATHAN S. ADELSTEIN, ONE WEB DAY - 3RD CELEBRATION, NEW AMERICA FOUNDATION. CMMR. September 22, 2008 [21]DOC-285530A1.doc [22]DOC-285530A1.pdf [23]DOC-285530A1.txt ----------------------------------------------------------------------- --- TEXTS ----------------------------------------------------------------------- --- AMENDMENT OF THE SCHEDULE OF APPLICATION FEES SET FORTH IN SECTIONS 1.1102 THROUGH 1.1109 OF THE COMMISSION'S RULES. The Commission makes rule changes to Part 1 of the Commission's rules, to adjust its fees for processing applications and other filings. (Dkt No. 86-285). Action by: the Commission. Adopted: 09/15/2008 by ORDER. (FCC No. 08-209). OMD [24]FCC-08-209A1.doc [25]FCC-08-209A1.pdf [26]FCC-08-209A1.txt * * * * * ADDENDA: THE FOLLOWING ITEMS, RELEASED SEPTEMBER 19, 2008, DID
• http://www.fcc.gov/Daily_Releases/Daily_Digest/2011/dd110303.html
  • Commission. Adopted: 03/01/2011 by REPORT. (FCC No. 11-33). OCBO [52]FCC-11-33A1.doc [53]FCC-11-33A2.doc [54]FCC-11-33A3.doc [55]FCC-11-33A4.doc [56]FCC-11-33A1.pdf [57]FCC-11-33A2.pdf [58]FCC-11-33A3.pdf [59]FCC-11-33A4.pdf [60]FCC-11-33A1.txt [61]FCC-11-33A2.txt [62]FCC-11-33A3.txt [63]FCC-11-33A4.txt CHARLES BRECKENRIDGE ON REQUEST FOR INSPECTION OF RECORDS. Denied the Application for Review. Action by: the Commission. Adopted: 03/01/2011 by MO&O. (FCC No. 11-35). OGC [64]FCC-11-35A1.doc [65]FCC-11-35A1.pdf [66]FCC-11-35A1.txt AMENDMENT OF THE SCHEDULE OF APPLICATION FEES SET FORTH IN SECTIONS 1.1102 THROUGH 1.1109 OF THE COMMISSION'S RULES. Revised Section 8 Application Fee Order. (Dkt No. 86-285 ). Action by: the Commission. Adopted: 02/28/2011 by ORDER. (FCC No. 11-27). OMD [67]FCC-11-27A1.doc [68]FCC-11-27A1.pdf [69]FCC-11-27A1.txt IMPLEMENTATION OF SECTIONS 716 AND 717 OF THE COMMUNICATIONS ACT OF 1934, AS ENACTED BY THE TWENTY-FIRST CENTURY COMMUNICATIONS AND VIDEO ACCESSIBILITY ACT OF 2010. Initiated a proceeding to
• http://www.fcc.gov/Daily_Releases/Daily_Digest/2011/dd110620.html
  • No. 11-1079). (Dkt No 11-86 ). WCB . Contact: Tracey Wilson at (202) 418-1394 or Dennis Johnson at (202) 418-0809 [29]DA-11-1079A1.doc [30]DA-11-1079A1.pdf [31]DA-11-1079A1.txt ----------------------------------------------------------------------- --- SPEECHES ----------------------------------------------------------------------- --- CHAIRMAN JULIUS GENACHOWSKI, REMARKS ON CRAMMING, CENTER FOR AMERICAN PROGRESS, WASHINGTON, DC. OCHJG [32]DOC-307730A1.doc [33]DOC-307730A1.pdf [34]DOC-307730A1.txt ----------------------------------------------------------------------- --- TEXTS ----------------------------------------------------------------------- --- AMENDMENT OF THE SCHEDULE OF APPLICATION FEES SET FORTH IN SECTIONS 1.1102 THROUGH 1.1109 OF THE COMMISSION'S RULES. Clarified that high bidders must still pay any fees required by Section 1.1104 when filing their post-auction long-form applications. (Dkt No. 86-285 ). Action by: the Commission. Adopted: 06/17/2011 by ORDER. (FCC No. 11-98). GEN [35]FCC-11-98A1.doc [36]FCC-11-98A1.pdf [37]FCC-11-98A1.txt IMPROVING PUBLIC SAFETY COMMUNICATIONS IN THE 800 MHZ BAND. Postponed the 800 MHz rebanding financial reconciliation
• http://www.fcc.gov/Daily_Releases/Daily_Digest/2011/dd110624.html
  • TELECOMMUNICATIONS RELAY SERVICE PROGRAM. Set forth in detail, the steps that Rolka Loube Saltzer Associates (RLSA) must take in performing audits, overseeing audits, and resolving audit findings and recommendations concerning the Telecommunications Relay Service. Action by: Deputy Managing Director by LETTER. (DA No. 11-1101). OMD [21]DA-11-1101A1.pdf [22]DA-11-1101A1.txt ERRATUM - AMENDMENT OF THE SCHEDULE OF APPLICATION FEES SET FORTH IN SECTIONS 1.1102 THROUGH 1.1109 OF THE COMMISSION'S RULES. Issued an Erratum to Second Order, FCC 11-98, released June 20, 2011. (Dkt No. 86-285 ). Action by: Deputy Managing Director by ERRATUM. OMD [23]DOC-307946A1.doc [24]DOC-307946A1.pdf [25]DOC-307946A1.txt COMSCAPE COMMUNICATIONS, INC. Denied the construction extension and waiver requests, and dismissed the renewal applications. Dismissed Comscape's application to assign WPOJ722 to New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC.
• http://www.fcc.gov/Forms/Form609-T/609-t.pdf
  • and Filing Locations An application fee may be required with this form. Pursuant to Section 1.2114(c) of the Commission's rules, for purposes of calculating the application fee, an application on Form 609-T for consent to a reportable eligibility event will be treated as a transfer of control for purposes of determining the applicable application fee as set forth in Section 1.1102 of the Commission's rules. To determine the required fee amount, refer to Subpart G of Part 1 of the Commission's rules or the current Fee Filing Guide. For assistance with fees applicable to the radio services governed by the Commission's rules, call (877) 480-3201 (TTY (717) 338-2824). The current Fee Filing Guide can be downloaded from the FCC's website at
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2007/FCC-07-125A1.html
  • at Law, to Dana Leavitt, Special Counsel, Investigations and Hearings Division, Enforcement Bureau, Federal Communications Commission, dated January 25, 2007, at 1, 13, 16 ("Second LOI Response"). Charles Guskey, a former business colleague of Bishop, served as an outside accountant to Continental Wireless Cable Television, Inc. Daniel R. Goodman, Receiver; Dr. Robert Chan, Petition for Waiver of Sections 90.633(c) and 1.1102 of the Commission's Rules, Memorandum Opinion and Order and Order on Reconsideration, 13 FCC Rcd 21944 (1998); pet. for review denied, Daniel Goodman v. FCC, 182 F.3d 987 (D.C. Cir. 1999). See Applications of Preferred Communication Systems, Inc., Order, 14 FCC Rcd 20,648 (WTB 1999). See Preferred Acquisitions Inc., FCC Form 175, dated July 17, 2000, at Exhibit A, at
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/FCC-03-201A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/FCC-03-201A1.pdf
  • Common Carrier Bureau went beyond delegated authority, based on lack of novel questions of fact, law, or policy). 47 C.F.R. � 1.925(b)(3). See Application for Review at 6. We note also that waiver requests under Section 1.925 ``must be filed on FCC Form 601, 603, or 605,'' and must be accompanied by a $145.00 fee. 47 C.F.R. �� 1.925(a), 1.925(b), 1.1102. Delta did not file its waiver request on one of those forms, nor did it pay a fee. The Media Bureau has no rules-based waiver standard corresponding to 47 C.F.R. � 1.925. Section 1.3 of the Rules (47 C.F.R. � 1.3), under Part 1 - Practice and Procedure, states that rule provisions may be waived ``for good cause shown,'' and
• http://www.fcc.gov/fees/appfees.html
  • Applications and Other Filings. Order FCC 08-209: [52]Word | [53]Acrobat 9/6/06 Amendment of the Schedule of Application Fees. Order FCC-06-131: [54]Word | [55]Acrobat 8/2/04 Amendment of the Schedule of Application Fees. Erratum: [56]Word | [57]Acrobat 6/25/04 Amendment of the Schedule of Application Fees. Order FCC-04-150: [58]Word | [59]Acrobat 10/18/02 Amendment of the Schedule of Application Fees Set Forth in Section 1.1102 through 1.1107 of the Commission's Rules. Order FCC 02-290: [60]Text | [61]Word | [62]Acrobat 7/12/02 Amendment of the Schedule of Application Fees Set Forth in Section 1.1102 through 1.1107 of the Commission's Rules. Order FCC 02-202: [63]Text | [64]Word | [65]Acrobat Ammended Schedule of Application Fees: [66]Text | [67]Excel | [68]Acrobat 8/4/00 Amendment of the Schedule of Application Fees. Order
• http://www.fcc.gov/fees/da022513.html
  • media information 202 / 418-0500 Fax-On-Demand 202 / 418-2830 Internet: http://www.fcc.gov ftp.fcc.gov __________________________________________________________________ DA 02-2513 October 4, 2002 FCC Suspends Collection of the July 2002 Amended Schedule of Application Fees; July 2000 Schedule of Application Fees Continues In Effect Until Further Notice By this Notice, we are suspending the collection of the increase in application fees set forth in Section 1.1102 through 1.1107 of the Commissions Rules, 47 C.F.R. 1.1102 1.1107, announced in the Commissions Order of July 12, 2002, GEN Docket No. 86-285, FCC 02-202. Filings requiring application fees should continue to tender the fees as set forth in the Schedule of Application Fees, GEN Docket No. 86-285, FCC 00-286 (2000), posted at [1]www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/OMD/Orders/fcc00286.pdf, until further notice. This action is
• http://www.fcc.gov/ftp/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Databases/documents_collection/97-290.doc http://www.fcc.gov/ftp/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Databases/documents_collection/97-290.pdf
  • height of the antenna radiation center would cause the HAAT to increase to 152 meters, thus exceeding maximum permitted Class B facilities. Thus, the station would be compelled to reduce ERP to compensate for this minimal change. Effective September 12, 1996, this filing fee was increased to $690.00. See Amendment of the Schedule of Application Fees Set Forth in Sections 1.1102 through 1.1107, Gen. Docket 86-285, 11 FCC Rcd 10231, 61 Fed. Reg. 41967 (August 13, 1996), released August 7, 1996. The Tables of Allotments are contained in 47 C.F.R Section 73.202(b) for FM commercial radio and 47 C.F.R. Section 73.606(b) for television. The Notice's 47 C.F.R. Section 73.1690(c)(8) was changed to 73.1690(c)(9) to accommodate additional rule changes adopted by this