FCC Web Documents citing 0.51

as compiled by hallikainen.com/FccRules on 2012 07 01

• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-275668A1.pdf
  • 2-m distance Grass at 10-m distance Carpeted concrete slab --Aspect Angle Front, rear, rightside, right- rear (~45 deg.) Front and rear Rear # of TVs Tested One Three Three Separation Distance 2 m 2 m and 10 m 2 m and 10 m --Wall thickness 5.25 inches (0.13 m) 12 inches (0.30 m) --From transmit antenna to wall 20 inches (0.51 m)for2-m distance 162 inches (4.11 m)for 10-m distance 33 inches (0.85 m)for2-m distance 191 inches (4.85 m)for 10-m distance --From TV to wall 53 inches (1.36 m)for2-m distance 226 inches (5.75 m)for 10-m distance 33 inches (0.85 m)for2-m distance 191 inches (4.85 m)for 10-m distance Cable Connection 8-way splitter near cable entrance --> 6-foot RG-6 --> step attenuator --> 100-foot
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-35A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-35A1.pdf
  • * * Section 0.11 is amended by removing paragraph (a)(11). Section 0.31 is amended by revising paragraph (d) to read as follows: (d) To advise the Commission concerning engineering matters, including (in consultation with the Public Safety and Homeland Security Bureau where appropriate) privacy and security of communications, involved in making or implementing policy or in resolving specific cases. Section 0.51 is amended by adding paragraph 0.51(s) to read as follows: To coordinate with the Public Safety and Homeland Security Bureau on all matters affecting public safety, homeland security, national security, emergency management, disaster management, and related issues. Section 0.61 is amended by adding the paragraph 0.61(l) to read as follows: To coordinate with the Public Safety and Homeland Security Bureau
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-1381A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-1381A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-1381A1.txt
  • of the above reference application. DIRECTV does not oppose the request. 2. We find it is in the public interest to grant the parties an extension of time in which to file comments on the above captioned application. Therefore, we extend the date to file comments on DIRECTV's application until July 6, 2000. This action is taken pursuant to Sections 0.51, 0.261, 1.46 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.51, 0.261, 1.46. 3. Accordingly, the State of Alaska and the State of Hawaii (the ``States'') Request for Extension of Time is GRANTED and the deadline for filing comments on the above captioned application is EXTENDED from June 23, 2000, until July 6, 2000. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Thomas S. Tycz Chief,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-192A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-192A1.txt
  • February 2, 2000, ex parte presentations relating to this proceeding are subject to the disclosure requirements set forth in Section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules. [47 C.F.R. � 1.1206.] This action is taken pursuant to the authority in Section 4(i) and 303 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 154(i) and 303 and pursuant to Section 0.51, 0.261, and 1.1200(a) of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.51, 0.261, and 1.1200(a). By the Chief, International Bureau Page 8 of 8
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2249A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2249A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2249A1.txt
  • effective October 2, 2000, ex parte presentations relating to this proceeding are subject to the disclosure requirements set forth in Section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules. 47 C.F.R. �� 1.1206. This action is taken pursuant to authority found in Sections 4(i) and 303 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 154(i), 303, and pursuant to Sections 0.51, 0.261, and 1.1200(a) of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.51, 0.261, 1.1200(a), For further information, contact Steven Spaeth, International Bureau, (202) 418-1539. - FCC - +D`� +D�� �����PNG > �!�R>^��S�S߿�"K�k������er4 �J�dM�O�O � �,I TV��5 0�z̪�� ��� %�o� �� � �a�% Tf(c) U~��Uy�Ӛ�o=�c� {�YAD ���Zv�}�YAD e/�,�-�%E9 ^1�J 2�� bʆPh=f 8H�]}��`��2@ ���'����X�t�p�O � ��$��>��� -�m�``�Q(q P� ���e D �_�� p�/]b|?�O� V��Jõ
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2649A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2649A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2649A1.txt
  • communicating with the Mabuhay satellite at 146� E.L. in the conventional C-band. As a condition on this waiver, ALSAT-designated earth stations ARE PROHIBITED from sending or receiving any analog FM video television signal to or from the Mabuhay satellite. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to Section 309(a) of the Communications Act, as amended, 47 U.S.C. � 309(a), and Sections 0.51 and 0.261 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.51, 0.261, Loral CyberStar, Inc. IS GRANTED authority to operate a transmit/receive earth station at Kapolei, Hawaii, as specified in Application File No. SES-LIC-19980921-01353, subject to the conditions set forth in paragraph 19 of this Order. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to Section 309(a) of the Communications Act, as amended,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-663A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-663A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-663A1.txt
  • all U.S.-licensed satellites, as conditioned, will be consistent with the Commission's policies regarding U.S. access to space stations licensed by foreign administrations. We therefore grant the earth station applications to the extent indicated in this Order. V. ORDERING CLAUSES Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to Section 309(a) of the Communications Act, as amended, 47 U.S.C. � 309(a), and Sections 0.51 and 0.261 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.51, 0.261, Williams Communications, Inc. IS GRANTED authority to modify its transmit/receive earth station at Perris, California, Call Sign E950202, as specified in Application No. SES-MOD-19980121-00104 as revised, to the extent specified in this Order, subject to the conditions set forth in this Order. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-130A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-130A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-130A1.txt
  • Hold Separate Stipulation and Order referred to herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, that AT&T's ``Petition to Deny,'' filed in this proceeding IS DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this Memorandum Opinion and Order SHALL BE EFFECTIVE upon release in accordance with 47 C.F.R. � 1.103. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this action is taken under delegated authority pursuant to sections 0.51, 0.91, 0.131, 0.261, 0.291, and 0.331 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.51, 0.91, 0.131, 0.261, 0.291, 0.331. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Dorothy T. Attwood Chief, Common Carrier Bureau Donald Abelson Chief, International Bureau James D. Schlichting, Deputy Chief, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau See In re Applications of Intermedia Communications, Inc., and WorldCom, Inc., Transferee, for Consent to Transfer Control of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1315A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1315A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1315A1.txt
  • or even acknowledged, its failure to meet the second milestone requirement. MHCH's Big LEO license is therefore null and void by operation of the condition requiring adherence to the specified milestone schedule ``unless extended for good cause shown.'' IV. Ordering Clauses Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to 47 U.S.C. �� 151, 153(i), 155(c), 301, and 309(h) and 47 C.F.R. �� 0.51(d) and 25.102(a), that the license issued to MCHI on July 1, 1997 for launch and operation of a ``Big LEO'' Mobile-Satellite Service system IS NULL AND VOID. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that MCHI's Petition for Partial Reconsideration and Request for Clarification of the order that granted its Big LEO license, filed on July 31, 1997, and the applications for review
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2090A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2090A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2090A1.txt
  • and reply dates absent extraordinary circumstances. PanAmSat has presented none. We therefore find that it is not in the public interest to grant PanAmSat the one-week extension it requests. This decision is made pursuant to the authority found in Sections 4(i) and 303 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 154(i), 303; and pursuant to Sections 0.51, 0.261, 1.46 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.51, 0.261, 1.46. Accordingly, PanAmSat's request for an extension of time in which to file comments is DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Thomas S. Tycz Chief, Satellite and Radiocommunication Division, International Bureau 47 U.S.C. � 763(5). Id. Public Notice, Report No. SAT-00081 (Aug. 28, 2001). See Public Notice, Report No. SAT-MSC-20010405-00029, April
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2100A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2100A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2100A1.txt
  • Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.65, GE Capital and SES Global are afforded thirty days from the date of release of this Order and Authorization to amend all such pending applications in connection with the instant Transfer Application to reflect the new ownership structure approved in this Order and Authorization. This action is taken under delegated authority pursuant to Sections 0.51, 0.261, 0.131, 0.331 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.51, 0.261, 0.131, 0.331, and SHALL BE EFFECTIVE upon release. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Donald Abelson Chief, International Bureau Thomas J. Sugrue Chief, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau Appendix A List of GE Americom and Columbia Licenses and Authorizations Subject to Transfer by GE Capital I. Space Station Licenses: Held on Non-Common Carrier
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2314A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2314A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2314A1.txt
  • 5, 2001. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that pursuant to Section 1.46 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.46, the request of Cellular Telephone & Internet Association to extend the deadline for filing comments and reply comments in this proceeding, filed September 25, 2001, is GRANTED to the extent indicated. This actions is taken under delegated authority pursuant to Sections 0.51 and 0.261 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R . �� 0.51, 0.261. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Richard B. Engelman Chief, Planning & Negotiations Division International Bureau Flexibility for Delivery of Communications by Mobile Satellite Service Providers in the 2 GHz band, the L-Band, and the 1.6/2.4 GHz Band, IB Docket No. 01-185, Notice of Proposed Rule Making, FCC 01-225 (rel. Aug.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2482A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2482A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2482A1.txt
  • of GE Capital's holdings in GE Americom and Columbia Communications Corporation to SES Global, amend all pending applications to reflect the new ownership structure approved in this Supplemental Order. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that with respect to all other ordering provisions, the October 2, 2001 Order and Authorization remains effective. This action is taken under delegated authority pursuant to Sections 0.51, 0.261, 0.131, 0.331 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.51, 0.261, 0.131, 0.331, and SHALL BE EFFECTIVE upon release. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Donald Abelson Chief, International Bureau Thomas J. Sugrue Chief, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau General Electric Capital Corporation, Transferors, and SES Global, S.A., Transferees, for Consent to Transfer Control of Licenses and Authorizations Pursuant to Sections 214(a) and 310(d)
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2548A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2548A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2548A1.txt
  • to November 12, 2001. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that pursuant to Section 1.46 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.46, the requests of Cellular Telephone & Internet Association and Motient Services Inc. to extend the deadline for filing reply comments in this proceeding are GRANTED to the extent indicated. This actions is taken under delegated authority pursuant to Sections 0.51 and 0.261 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R . �� 0.51, 0.261. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Richard B. Engelman Chief, Planning & Negotiations Division International Bureau Flexibility for Delivery of Communications by Mobile Satellite Service Providers in the 2 GHz band, the L-Band, and the 1.6/2.4 GHz Band, IB Docket No. 01-185, CTIA Request for Extension of Time (filed Oct. 26,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2659A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2659A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2659A1.txt
  • the public interest or consistent with Commission policies. Therefore, we reject ATN's arguments and deny the petition for waiver. iii. ordering clauses Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to Sections 1, 2, 4(i), 4(j), 5(c), 201, 214, and 303(r) of the Communication Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151, 152, 154(i), 154(j), 155(c), 201, 214, and 303(r), and Sections 0.51, 0.261, 1.3 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.51, 0.261, 1.3, that ATN's petition for waiver of the benchmark settlement rate transition deadline for the U.S.-Guyana route IS DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this order is effective upon release. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Kathryn O'Brien Acting Chief Telecommunications Division International Bureau Atlantic Tele-Network, Inc., Petition for Waiver of the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2727A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2727A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2727A1.txt
  • Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit � d DA 01-2727 Released: November 20, 2001 COMMON CARRIER, INTERNATIONAL, AND WIRELESS TELECOMMUNICATIONS BUREAUS MODIFY WORLDCOM-INTERMEDIA MERGER CONDITIONS CC Docket No. 00-206 Pursuant to sections 214 and 310(d) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 214 and 310(d), and sections 63.01, 0.51, 0.91, 0.131, 0.261, 0.291, and 0.331 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 63.01, 0.51, 0.91, 0.131, 0.261, 0.291, and 0.331, the Common Carrier, Wireless Telecommunications, and International Bureaus (the Bureaus) grant WorldCom, Inc.'s (WorldCom's) request to modify a condition imposed in a January 17, 2001, Bureau-level Memorandum Opinion and Order (WorldCom-Intermedia Merger Order), which approved the transfer of control
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2904A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2904A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2904A1.txt
  • COMSAT's request to discontinue its occasional-use television, occasional-use IBS and part-time IBS services on its dominant routes effective January 1, 2002. ordering clauses Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to Sections 1, 2, 4(i), 4(j), 5(c), 214, and 303(r) of the Communication Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151, 152, 154(i), 154(j), 155(c), 214, and 303(r), and Sections 0.51, 0.261, 63.19, 63.62, 63.71, and 63.505 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.51, 0.261, 63.19, 63.62, 63.71, 63.505, COMSAT's Application for authority to discontinue the provision of occasional-use television, occasional-use IBS and part-time IBS services by World Systems on routes where World Systems is regulated as dominant IS GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this order is effective upon
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-609A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-609A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-609A1.txt
  • not be eligible for those rights, because the Bureau properly dismissed TelQuest's earth station application in 1996, and that dismissal was upheld by the Commission. Finally, EchoStar's planned earth stations otherwise conform with the Commission's rules. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to Sections 301 and 309(a) of the Communications Act, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 301, 309(a), and Sections 0.51 and 0.261 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.51, 0.261, EchoStar North America Corporation IS GRANTED authority to construct and operate three transmit/receive earth stations at Laramie, Wyoming, as specified in Application Nos. File Nos. 11-DSE-P/L-98, 270-DSE-P/L-98, 274-DSE-P/L-98; IBFS File Nos. SES-LIC-19971003-01417; SES-LIC-19971125-01672; SES-LIC-19971125-01673. This Order is issued pursuant to Section 0.261 of the Commission's rules on delegated authority,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-961A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-961A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-961A1.txt
  • IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Petition to Impose Conditions of the Communications Workers of America IS DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this Memorandum Opinion and Order SHALL BE EFFECTIVE upon release in accordance with 47 C.F.R. � 1.103. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this action is taken under delegated authority pursuant to 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 0.101, 0.321, 0.51, 0.261, 0.331 and 0.131. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Dorothy T. Attwood Chief, Common Carrier Bureau Deborah Lathen Chief, Cable Services Bureau Donald Abelson Chief, International Bureau Thomas J. Sugrue Chief, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau See Global Crossing Ltd. Seeks FCC Consent for Transfer of Control of Frontier to Citizens Communications Company, Public Notice, DA 00-2366 (rel. Oct. 19, 2000) (Global Crossing Application).
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-190A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-190A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-190A1.txt
  • that the Applicants would be harmed by the grant of a stay, and that a stay would not serve the public interest. V. ORDERING CLAUSES Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that the Motion for Stay submitted by the Litigation Recovery Trust in the above-captioned proceeding on December 23, 2001, IS DENIED. This action is taken under delegated authority pursuant to Sections 0.51, 0.261, 0.131, 0.331 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.51, 0.261, 0.131, 0.331, and SHALL BE EFFECTIVE upon release. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Donald Abelson Chief, International Bureau Litigation Recovery Trust, Motion for Stay, December 23, 2001 (LRT Motion for Stay). See Lockheed Martin Global Telecommunications, Comsat Corporation, and Comsat General Corporation, (Assignor) and Telenor Satellite Mobile Services, Inc. and
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2041A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2041A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2041A1.txt
  • and after January 1, 2002. IV. ORDERING CLAUSES 9. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that Sprint's modification request for an accounting rate of 0.68SDR per minute for IMTS and ISDN services with VTI is denied. 10. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that U.S. carriers negotiate settlement rates with VTI that comply with the Benchmarks Order. This Order is issued pursuant to Sections 0.51 and 0.261 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.51 and 0.261, and is effective upon release. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Breck Blalock Deputy Chief, Policy Division International Bureau The current international accounting rate system was developed as part of a regulatory tradition in which international telecommunications services were supplied through a bilateral correspondent relationship between national monopoly carriers. An accounting
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3373A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3373A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3373A1.txt
  • grant IS CONDITIONED on our requirement pursuant to Section 25.119(f) of the Commissions Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 119(f), that Northrop Grumman shall consummate this transaction within 60 days from the date of this authorization, and within 30 days of consummation, notify the Commission by letter of the date of consummation. This action is taken under delegated authority pursuant to Sections 0.51, 0.261, 0.131, 0.331 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.51, 0.261, 0.131, 0.331, and SHALL BE EFFECTIVE upon release. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Thomas S. Tycz Chief, Satellite Division See TRW Inc. and Northrop Grumman Corporation Application for Transfer of Control of the Ka-band Satellite Authorizations held by TRW Inc. to Northrop Grumman Corporation (``Application''), Public Notice Report No. SAT-00126,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-575A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-575A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-575A1.txt
  • for U.S.-India traffic effective for the period April 1, 2000 through March 31, 2001, and for an accounting rate of 68 cents per minute with VSNL from April 1, 2001 through December 31, 2001. 11. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that U.S. carriers negotiate settlement rates with VSNL that comply with the Benchmarks Order. This Order is issued pursuant to Sections 0.51 and 0.261 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.51 and 0.261, and is effective upon release. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION George Li Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Division International Bureau The current international accounting rate system was developed as part of a regulatory tradition in which international telecommunications services were supplied through a bilateral correspondent relationship between national monopoly carriers. An accounting
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-576A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-576A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-576A1.txt
  • 154(i) and (j), 309, and 310(d), the applications filed by Orbital Communications Corporation and ORBCOMM Global, L.P., File Nos. SAT-ASG-20010726-00068, SES-ASG-20010726-01401, 0050-EX-AL-2001 and 0053-EX-AL-2001, for authority to assign licenses and authorizations to ORBCOMM License Corporation and ORBCOMM LLC ARE GRANTED, to the extent specified in this Order and Authorization. 26. This action is taken under delegated authority pursuant to sections 0.51 and 0.261 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.51 and 0.261, and SHALL BE EFFECTIVE upon release. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Donald Abelson Chief, International Bureau APPENDIX A LIST OF ORBCOMM COMMUNICATIONS CORP. and ORBCOMM GLOBAL, L.P. LICENSES SUBJECT TO ASSIGNMENT 1) LICENSES HELD BY ORBCOMM COMMUNICATIONS CORP. Space segment authorizations and Special Temporary Authority: FCC Call Sign S2103 A
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-601A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-601A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-601A1.txt
  • IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that pursuant to Section 1.46 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.46, the requests of AT&T Wireless Services, Inc. and Cellular Telephone & Internet Association to extend the deadline for filing comments in response to the Technical Public Notice are GRANTED to the extent indicated. This actions is taken under delegated authority pursuant to Sections 0.51 and 0.261 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R . �� 0.51, 0.261. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Richard B. Engelman Chief, Planning & Negotiations Division International Bureau Commission Staff Invites Technical Comments on the Certain Proposals to Permit Flexibility in the Delivery of Communications by Mobile Satellite Service Providers in the 2 GHz Band, the L-Band, and the 1.6/2.4 GHz Band, IB
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-790A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-790A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-790A1.txt
  • filing of responses and oppositions from April 24, 2002 to May 6, 2002. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that pursuant to Section 1.46 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.46, the request of XO Communications, Inc. to extend the pleading cycle in this proceeding is GRANTED to the extent indicated. This action is taken under delegated authority pursuant to Sections 0.51 and 0.261 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R . �� 0.51, 0.261. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION James Ball Chief, Policy Division International Bureau See, ``Commission Seeks Comment on Applications For Consent to Transfer Control Filed by XO Communications, Inc.'' DA 02-579, rel. Mar. 11, 2002; Erratum, rel. Mar. 12, 2002. See, 47 C.F.R. � 1.46(a). (continued....) Federal Communications Commission DA 02-790
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-806A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-806A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-806A1.txt
  • for comments and reply comments. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that pursuant to Section 1.46 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.46, the request of Maritime Telecommunications Network Inc. is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHERED ORDERED that the deadline for filing comments in this proceeding IS EXTENDED to May 10, 2002. This action is taken under delegated authority pursuant to Sections 0.51 and 0.261 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R . �� 0.51, 0.261. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION James Ball Chief, Policy Division International Bureau 47 C.F.R. � 1.46. The International Telecommunication Union's Radiocommunication Bureau. Motion for Extension of Time at 1. The ITU-R Working Group 4-9S meeting will be held from April 17-25, 2002. The deadline for comments in this proceeding is
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2229A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2229A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2229A1.txt
  • reply comment date to July 25, 2003. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that pursuant to Section 1.46 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.46, the request of Globalstar L.P. is DENIED. IT IS FURTHERED ORDERED that the deadline for filing comments in this proceeding IS EXTENDED to July 11, 2003. This action is taken under delegated authority pursuant to Sections 0.51 and 0.261 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R . �� 0.51, 0.261. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION James Ball Chief, Policy Division International Bureau 47 C.F.R. � 1.46. GLP Request for Extension of Time, IB Docket 02-364 (filed June 30, 2003). ICO Request for Extension of Time, IB Docket 02-364 (filed July 2, 2003) (ICO Comments); Committee Comments in Support of Request
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2764A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2764A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2764A1.txt
  • 1.106 of the Commission's Rules, reconsideration of such interlocutory actions will not be entertained. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to Section 1.106(a)(1) of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.106(a)(1), the Petition for Reconsideration filed July 17, 2003 by Iridium 2GHz LLC, regarding File Nos. SAT-MOD-20030609-00103, SAT-WAV-20030609-00104, IS DISMISSED. This action is taken under delegated authority pursuant to Sections 0.51 and 0.261 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.51, 0.261. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Donald Abelson Chief, International Bureau Petition for Reconsideration of Iridium 2GHz LLC regarding File Nos. SAT-MOD-20030609-00103, SAT-WAV-20030609-00104 (July 17, 2003). See Letter from Thomas S. Tycz, Chief, Satellite Division, International Bureau, FCC to Peter D. Shields, Counsel for Iridium 2GHz LLC (July 3, 2003) (``July 3,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2831A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2831A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2831A1.txt
  • have had the effect of reducing the dilution achieved through the IPO. Therefore, we see no reason to further investigate New Skies' share buy-back plan. The PanAmSat Emergency Request for Inquiry Into the Continuing Qualifications of New Skies Satellites, N.V. to Access the U.S. Market, File No. SAT-MSC-20021101-00236, is DENIED. This action is taken under delegated authority pursuant to Sections 0.51 and 0.261 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. �0.261, and is effective upon release. Petitions for reconsideration under Section 1.106 or applications for review under Section 1.115 of the Commission's rules 47 C.F.R. �� 1.106, 1.115 may be filed within 30 days of the date of release of this Order. (See 47 C.F.R. � 1.4(b)(2).) FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Cassandra C.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-390A2.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-390A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-390A2.txt
  • Service with Argentina, 11 FCC Rcd. 18,014, � 2 (1996). Id. at � 2. Id. at � 1. Id. AT&T Corp., Proposed Extension of Accounting Rate Agreement for Switched Voice Service with Argentina, 14 FCC Rcd. 8306, �13 (1999). See also, id (noting that ``the Commission's authority to enforce the ISP is found in Section 201''). See 47 C.F.R. Sect. 0.51(c), (d), (r). Id. at � 4. Regulation of International Accounting Rates, 6 FCC Rcd. 3552, �� 1-3, 16 & n. 30 (1991). See Public Notice DA 00-2356, Oct. 19, 2000. ISP Reform Order, 14 FCC Rcd. 7963, �13 (1999). Id. Id. at � 14. As noted above, PLDT terminates its U.S.-bound traffic with AT&T at lower rates than the 8
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-581A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-581A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-581A1.txt
  • attempts to have their circuits on the U.S.-Philippines route fully restored; IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that AT&T's request for interim relief is hereby MOOT; This Order is issued pursuant to Sections 1, 2, 4(i)-(j), 201-205, 211, 214, 303(r), and 309 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. 151, 152, 154(i)-154(j), 201-205, 211, 214, 303(r), 309, and Sections 0.51, 0.261, 43.51, 63.14, 63.16, 64.1001 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.51 and 0.261, and is effective upon release. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Donald Abelson Chief International Bureau The Commission has precedent in protecting U.S. consumers and competition from anticompetitive behavior or ``whipsawing.'' The term ``whipsawing,'' as we describe further below in paras. 10-17, has been used to refer to
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1042A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1042A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1042A1.txt
  • and Authorization, DA 04-357, File Nos. SAT-ASG-20030728-00138/00139, and in Supplemental Order, DA 04-612, File Nos. SAT-ASG-20030728-00138/00139, IS DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the customer notification requirements set forth in Order and Authorization, DA 04-357, File Nos. SAT-ASG-20030728-00138/00139, and in Supplemental Order, DA 04-612, File Nos. SAT-ASG-20030728-00138/00139, remain in effect. This action is taken under delegated authority pursuant to Sections 0.51 and 0.261 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.51, 0.261, and SHALL BE EFFECTIVE upon release. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Donald Abelson Chief, International Bureau Intelsat North America LLC, Request for Deferral of Notification, File Nos. SAT-ASG-20030728-00138/00139 (Request for Deferral of Notification). Loral Satellite, Inc. (Debtor-in-Possession) and Loral SpaceCom Corporation (Debtor-in-Possession), and Intelsat North America, LLC, Applications for Consent to
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1299A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1299A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1299A1.txt
  • of this Order and responses must be filed on or before 28 days from the release of this Order. This Order is issued pursuant to Sections 4(i) and 310(d) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 154(i) and 310(d), Exception 4 of the Freedom of Information Act, 5 U.S.C. � 552(b)(4), and authority delegated under Sections 0.51 and 0.261 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.51, 0.261, and is effective upon its adoption. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Thomas S. Tycz Chief, Satellite Division International Bureau APPENDIX A Protective Order 1. Introduction. On December 16, 2003, Commission staff requested certain information from Mobile Satellite Ventures Subsidiary LLC (``MSV'') regarding pending waiver requests associated with MSV's Ancillary Terrestrial Component
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2689A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2689A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2689A1.txt
  • of satellite arc of 10 W and the earth station location of 28 2 29 North Latitude and 80 35 43 West Longitude. If Telco214 refiles, it must supply a value for azimuth consistent with the limits of the satellite arc and the location of the earth station. Therefore, pursuant to the Commission's rules on delegated authority, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.51 and 0.261(a)(4), we find that the above-captioned application is defective. We dismiss this application, without prejudice to refilling. If Telco214 refiles, the application is to be complete and consistent, and to contain all required technical parameters and reports applicable to the frequency bands proposed for operation. In addition, we note that the antenna listed in application SES-LIC-20040528-00746 is 3.7 meters
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3518A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3518A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3518A1.txt
  • 1 Federal Communications Commission 445 12th St., S.W. DA 04-3518 November 4, 2004 ADDITIONAL U.S.-INTERNATIONAL ROUTES EXEMPTED FROM THE INTERNATIONAL SETTLEMENTS POLICY IB Docket Nos. 02-324, 96-261 By the Chief, Policy Division, International Bureau: The routes listed in Attachment A are hereby exempted from the International Settlements Policy (ISP) pursuant to the ISP Reform First Report and Order and sections 0.51 and 0.261 of the Commission's rules. On March 30, 2004, the Commission released the ISP Reform Order that revised its policy and rules to remove the International Settlements Policy from benchmark-compliant routes. In the Order, the Commission identified ninety-six routes that clearly qualified for exemption from the ISP pursuant to the new rules. The Commission also identified seventy-seven routes that
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3639A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3639A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3639A1.txt
  • GWTP Investments, L.P. IS DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to section 310(d) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. � 310(d), the applications for assignment of the licenses set forth in Appendix A held by Verestar, Inc. (Debtor-in Possession) to SES Americom, Inc. ARE GRANTED. This action is taken under delegated authority pursuant to sections 0.51, 0.131, 0.261, 0.331 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.51, 0.131, 0.261, 0.331, and SHALL BE EFFECTIVE upon release. Petitions for reconsideration under section 1.106 or applications for review under section 1.115 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.106, 1.115, may be filed within 30 days of the date of this Order. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Donald Abelson Chief,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3885A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3885A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3885A1.txt
  • Bahamas to the list of routes exempt from the ISP filed by AT&T on February 27, 2004, ISP-PDR-20040227-00011, is DISMISSED. This Order is issued pursuant to sections 1, 2, 4(i), 4(j), 5(c), 201-205, 214 and 303(r) 309 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151, 152, 154(i), 154(j), 155(c), 201-205, 214 and 303(r), 309 and sections 0.51, 0.261, 1.3 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.51, 0.261, 1.3 and is effective upon release. Petitions for reconsideration under 1.106 or applications for review under section 1.115 of the Commission's Rules may be filed within 30 days of the date of public notice of this Order (see C.F.R. section 1.4(b)(2)). FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION James L. Ball Chief, Policy
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3905A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3905A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3905A1.txt
  • Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Federal Communications Commission 445 12th St., S.W. DA 04-3905 December 14, 2004 U.S.-ANGOLA ROUTE EXEMPTED FROM THE INTERNATIONAL SETTLEMENTS POLICY IB Docket Nos. 02-324, 96-261 By the Chief, Policy Division, International Bureau: The U.S.-Angola route is hereby exempted from the International Settlements Policy (ISP) pursuant to the ISP Reform First Report and Order and sections 0.51 and 0.261 of the Commission's rules. On March 30, 2004, the Commission released the ISP Reform Order that revised its policy and rules to remove the International Settlements Policy from benchmark-compliant routes. In the Order, the Commission identified ninety-six routes that clearly qualified for exemption from the ISP pursuant to the new rules. The Commission also identified seventy-seven routes, including
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-434A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-434A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-434A1.txt
  • Williams, and WorldCom, respectively, are DENIED with respect to the time periods encompassing March 1, 2002 through December 31, 2003. This Order is issued pursuant to Sections 1, 2, 4(i), 4(j), 5(c), 201-205, 214 and 303(r) 309 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151, 152, 154(i), 154(j), 155(c), 201-205, 214 and 303(r), 309 and Sections 0.51, 0.261, 1.3 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.51, 0.261, 1.3 and is effective upon release. Petitions for reconsideration under 1.106 or applications for review under Section 1.115 of the Commission's Rules may be filed within 30 days of the date of public notice of this Order (see C.F.R. Section 1.4(b)(2)). FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION James L. Ball Chief, Policy
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-579A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-579A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-579A1.txt
  • raised in this proceeding. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that pursuant to Section 1.46 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.46, the request of Maritime Telecommunications Network Inc. is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHERED ORDERED that the deadline for filing reply comments in this proceeding IS EXTENDED to March 24, 2004. This action is taken under delegated authority pursuant to Sections 0.51 and 0.261 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R . �� 0.51, 0.261. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION James Ball Chief, Policy Division International Bureau 47 C.F.R. � 1.46. (continued....) Federal Communications Commission DA 04-579 Federal Communications Commission DA 04-579 R S @& N 0 0 0 �&l � � � � � � �&l �
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-581A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-581A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-581A1.txt
  • On February 19, 2004, the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York confirmed XO as the winning bidder. Consequently, on February 20, 2004, Applicants filed a letter with the Commission's Secretary stating their intent to terminate the Allegiance/Qwest transaction and requested that the Commission dismiss the application without prejudice. 3. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 0.51, 0.91, 0.261 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.51, 0.91, 0.261 and 0.291, that the joint application of Allegiance Telecom, Inc., Debtor-in-Possession and Qwest Communications International Inc. IS DISMISSED without prejudice and WC Docket No. 04-13 IS HEREBY TERMINATED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Michelle M. Carey Chief, Competition Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau James Ball Chief, Policy Division
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-612A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-612A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-612A1.txt
  • ``additional services'' as defined under the ORBIT Act) is now being provided under a grant of Special Temporary Authority as specified in this Order and Authorization. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that with respect to all other ordering provisions, the Loral/Intelsat Order, DA 04-357, released on February 11, 2004, remains effective. This action is taken under delegated authority pursuant to Sections 0.51 and 0.261 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.51, 0.261, and SHALL BE EFFECTIVE upon release. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Donald Abelson Chief, International Bureau Loral Satellite, Inc. (Debtor-in-Possession) and Loral SpaceCom Corporation (Debtor-in-Possession), and Intelsat North America, LLC, Applications for Consent to Assignments of Space Station Authorizations and Petition for Declaratory Ruling Under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-755A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-755A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-755A1.txt
  • of this Order and responses must be filed on or before 21 days from the release of this Order. This Order is issued pursuant to Sections 4(i) and 310(d) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 154(i) and 310(d), Exception 4 of the Freedom of Information Act, 5 U.S.C. � 552(b)(4), and authority delegated under Sections 0.51 and 0.261 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.51, 0.261, and is effective upon its adoption. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Donald Abelson Chief, International Bureau APPENDIX A Protective Order 1. Introduction. On September 3, 2003, DIRECTV Enterprises, LLC. (``DIRECTV'') filed a request for Special Temporary Authority (``STA'') to relocate its DIRECTV 3 satellite from a storage orbit to a Canadian
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1679A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1679A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1679A1.txt
  • June 16, 2005 U.S.-CAMBODIA ROUTE TO BE EXEMPTED FROM THE INTERNATIONAL SETTLEMENTS POLICY IB Docket Nos. 02-324, 96-261 Comment Due Date: July 18, 2005 By the Chief, Policy Division, International Bureau: We hereby request comment regarding our intention to remove the International Settlements Policy (ISP) from the U.S.-Cambodia route pursuant to the ISP Reform First Report and Order and sections 0.51 and 0.261 of the Commission's rules. On March 30, 2004, the Commission released the ISP Reform Order that revised its policy and rules to remove the International Settlements Policy from benchmark-compliant routes. In the ISP Reform Order, the Commission found that those routes that had not yet met the benchmarks standard would be added to the list of routes exempt
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1679A1_Erratum.doc
  • June 16, 2005 U.S.-CAMBODIA ROUTE TO BE EXEMPTED FROM THE INTERNATIONAL SETTLEMENTS POLICY IB Docket Nos. 02-324, 96-261 Comment Due Date: July 18, 2005 By the Chief, Policy Division, International Bureau: We hereby request comment regarding our intention to remove the International Settlements Policy (ISP) from the U.S.-Cambodia route pursuant to the ISP Reform First Report and Order and sections 0.51 and 0.261 of the Commission's rules. On March 30, 2004, the Commission released the ISP Reform Order that revised its policy and rules to remove the International Settlements Policy from benchmark-compliant routes. In the ISP Reform Order, the Commission found that those routes that had not yet met the benchmarks standard would be added to the list of routes exempt
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2335A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2335A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2335A1.txt
  • date from September 13, 2005 to October 13, 2005. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that pursuant to Section 1.46 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.46, the request of the Massachusetts Port Authority to extend the deadline for filing comments and replies in response to the Public Notice is GRANTED. This action is taken under delegated authority pursuant to Sections 0.51 and 0.261 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R . �� 0.51, 0.261. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Bruce Franca Acting Chief Office of Engineering and Technology See OET Seeks Comment on Petition from Continental Airlines for Declaratory Ruling Regarding Whether Certain Restrictions on Antenna Installation are Permissible under the Commission's Over-the-Air Reception Devices (OTARD) Rules, ET Docket No. 05-247, Public Notice, DA
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-244A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-244A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-244A1.txt
  • petition for reconsideration of the 2001 Columbia 37.5� W.L. Replacement Authorization to the extent necessary to allow it to provide service through Satcom C-1 until AMC-12 is launched and brought into operation consistent with the launch milestones contained in condition 18 of the 2001 Columbia 37.5� W.L. Replacement Authorization. V. ORDERING CLAUSES 13. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to Sections 0.51, 0.261, 25.117(d) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.51, 0.261, 25.117(d), that the modification request filed by Columbia Communications Corporation on May 9, 2002, IBFS File No. SAT-MOD-20020517-00078, IS GRANTED, in part, to extent indicated above, and otherwise IS DEFERRED and that the amendment filed on August 26, 2004, IBFS File No. SAT-AMD-20040826-00161, IS GRANTED. 14. IT IS FURTHER
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2513A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2513A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2513A1.txt
  • Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit DA-05-2513 Friday September 23, 2005 U.S.-CAMBODIA ROUTE EXEMPTED FROM THE INTERNATIONAL SETTLEMENTS POLICY IB Docket Nos. 02-324, 96-261 By the Chief, Policy Division, International Bureau: . The U.S.-Cambodia route is hereby exempted from the International Settlements Policy (ISP) pursuant to the ISP Reform First Report and Order and sections 0.51 and 0.261 of the Commission's rules. On March 11, 2004 the Federal Communications Commission adopted the ISP Reform Order that revised its policy and rules to remove the International Settlements Policy from benchmark-compliant routes. In that Order, the Commission identified ninety-six routes that clearly qualified for exemption from the ISP pursuant to the new rules. Through a series of public
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1037A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1037A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1037A1.txt
  • of the Confidential Submission, under the terms of the Protective Order attached to this Order, once Inmarsat has executed such Protective Order. 5. This Order is issued pursuant to Section 4(i) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. � 154(i), Exception 4 of the Freedom of Information Act, 5 U.S.C. � 552(b)(4), and authority delegated under Sections 0.51 and 0.261 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.51, 0.261, and is effective upon its release. Federal Communications Commission Roderick Porter Deputy Chief, International Bureau In the matter of Mobile Satellite Ventures LP Mobile Satellite Ventures Subsidiary LLP MSV International LLC Request for Confidential Treatment ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Call Sign: S2358 File No. SAT-LOA-19980702-00066 Call
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2197A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2197A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2197A1.txt
  • Rcd 23140, Appendix B (2003). Nothing in this Agreement is intended to limit any obligation imposed by Federal law or regulation including, but not limited to, 47 U.S.C. � 222(a) and (c)(1) and the Commission's implementing regulations. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Petition to Deny filed by TeleGuam Holdings, LLC, is DENIED. This Order is issued pursuant to sections 0.51, 0.131, 0.261, and 0.331 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.51, 0.131, 0.261, and 0.331, and is effective upon release. Petitions for reconsideration under section 1.106 or applications for review under section 1.115 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.106, 1.115, may be filed within 30 days of the date of the release of this Order. See 47
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1564A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1564A2.txt
  • 0.43 N-4 -1.31 -1.43 -0.92 -1.07 -1.66 -1.07 -0.87 -1.94 -1.19 0.29 N-3 -0.79 -1.85 -2.23 -1.73 -1.50 -2.38 -1.47 -0.26 -1.71 0.53 N-2 -0.76 -1.94 -2.31 -0.53 -1.31 -0.91 -0.71 -0.89 -1.21 0.68 N+2 0.02 -2.99 -1.94 -0.48 -0.04 -0.67 -0.40 0.50 -0.93 1.12 Mean -0.83 -1.89 -1.80 -0.91 -1.27 -1.18 -1.04 -1.26 -1.28 Std Dev 0.55 0.68 0.56 0.51 0.72 0.69 0.56 1.64 0.68 Note: The overall means and standard deviations (lower right corner of the chart) omitted data for receiver G4 for reasons discussed in the section of this chapter entitled, "Desired Signal Source: SFU Versus ATSC997". The variability among these measured differences in D/U ratios for the change in undesired signal type is somewhat larger than that
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-25A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-25A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-25A1.txt
  • consumers throughout the United States. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that pursuant to Section 1.46 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.46, the request of SES Americom, Inc. is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHERED ORDERED that the deadline for filing reply comments in this proceeding IS EXTENDED to January 25, 2007. This action is taken under delegated authority pursuant to Sections 0.51 and 0.261 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R . �� 0.51, 0.261. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Robert G. Nelson Chief, Satellite Division International Bureau 47 C.F.R. � 1.46. (...continued from previous page) (continued....) Federal Communications Commission DA 07-25 Federal Communications Commission DA 07-25 �@��� � F 0 ,a� ...
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-318A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-318A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-318A1.txt
  • in over-the-air homes in Temple and Killeen falls far short of the required significantly viewed minimums, within one standard error, as shown in the table below: TABLE 1 - KEYE-TV VIEWING IN TEMPLE, TX Survey Households Share Standard Net Standard Year Studied Viewing Error Weekly Error Hours Circulation Feb. 2004/ 11 0.24 0.25 4.74 5.20 Nov. 2004 Feb. 2005/ 10 0.51 0.46 4.57 4.75 Nov. 2005 TABLE 2 - KEYE-TV VIEWING IN KILLEEN, TX Survey Households Share Standard Net Standard Year Studied Viewing Error Weekly Error Hours Circulation Feb. 2004/ 7 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Nov. 2004 Feb. 2005/ 14 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Nov. 2005 As a result, KWTX-TV requests that the Commission grant its petition so that it can
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3470A4.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3470A4.txt
  • 1 0.06 PBS1 181 11.43 PBS2 91 5.75 PBS3 40 2.53 PBS4 22 1.39 PBS5 6 0.38 PBS6 4 0.25 OtherBroadcastNetworks AZA 5 0.32 ION 52 3.28 TBN 37 2.34 TEL 22 1.39 TLF 19 1.20 UNI 37 2.34 Total 1,583100.00 Source:Authorcalculations.Note:IND1-IND9(PBS1-PBS6)are"virtualnetworks"consistingofthefirst,second, etc.Independent(Public)televisionstationofferedineachNielsenDMA.SeeSection4.1formoredetails.AZA =AztecaAmerica,ION=The"i"network,TBN=TrinityBroadcastingNetwork,TEL=Telemundo,TLF= Telefutura,andUNI=Univision 34 Table6: ProgramProductionbyProgrammingType 6:00p.m.-12:00a.m.EST(orequivalent),2weeks/year,2003-2006 AllBroadcast Cable Variable Networks NetworksNetworks NewsProgramming AnyNews 4.14 11.79 2.96 NetworkNews 0.51 2.63 0.18 LocalNews 3.63 9.16 2.78 PublicAffairsProgramming 1.98 3.40 1.76 MinorityProgramming NetworksTargetingBlackAudiences 3.39 0.00 3.91 TargetingLatinoAudiences OnNetworksTargetingLatinoAudiences 8.13 15.17 7.05 Spanish-LanguageProgramming 3.39 5.54 3.05 NetworksTargetingOtherDiverseAudiences 2.65 0.00 3.06 Children'sProgramming "Children'sProgramming" 1.93 0.84 2.10 GMoviesorTV-Y/TV-Y7TV 3.11 1.06 3.42 Eitheroftheabove 5.03 1.90 5.52 FamilyProgramming NetworksTargetingFamilies 10.93 0.00 12.61 TY-GProgramming 11.59 17.05 10.75 Arts,Educational,orDocumentaryProgramming 7.60 6.46 7.77 Eitherofthetwoabove 19.18 23.50 18.52 AdultProgramming NetworksShowingAdultProgramming
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3470A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3470A5.txt
  • VHF Channel 30.78 *** 10.64 Dummy2003 -35.42 ** 15.02 -6.31 6.78 Dummy2004 158.40 *** 24.37 13.51 10.08 Dummy2005 78.81 ** 34.58 16.42 13.77 Dummy2003*NonCommercial 2.09 12.85 Dummy2004*NonCommercial 79.51 *** 12.99 Dummy2005*NonCommercial -29.30 ** 13.06 Dummy2003*TV-Newspaper_Crossown 22.28 40.07 Dummy2004*TV-Newspaper_Crossown 12.61 40.11 Dummy2005*TV-Newspaper_Crossown -3.90 40.12 Additional Dummy Variables Used: Every Market Every Station (not shown in table) No. Observations 6,703 6,703 R2 0.51 0.93 *** indicates significance at the 1 percent level ** indicates significance at the 5 percent level * indicates significance at the 10 percent level II - 1 Section II Ownership Structure, Market Characteristics and the Quantity of News and Public Affairs Programming: An Empirical Analysis of Radio Airplay Kenneth Lynch July 30, 2007 Abstract This section of the study
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3470A6.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3470A6.txt
  • AM Drive 0.09 0.05 0.00 0.61 255 Percent Sports, AM Drive 0.06 0.00 0.00 0.83 255 Percent Local, Evening 0.71 0.90 0.00 1.00 281 Percent Network/Syndicated, Evening 0.26 0.09 0.00 1.00 281 Percent Live, Evening 0.65 0.78 0.00 1.00 281 Percent Advertisements, Evening 0.18 0.18 0.00 0.48 281 Percent Entertainment/Leisure/DJ Banter, Evening 0.08 0.01 0.00 0.93 281 Percent Music, Evening 0.51 0.69 0.00 1.00 281 Percent News, Evening 0.03 0.00 0.00 0.61 281 Percent Sports, Evening 0.11 0.00 0.00 0.93 281 Average Block, Advertisements, AM Drive 1.42 1.10 0.00 10.75 255 Average Block, Entertainment/Leisure/DJ Banter, AM Drive 2.11 1.00 0.00 17.63 255 Average Block, Music, AM Drive 1.89 2.22 0.00 8.44 255 Average Block, News, AM Drive 0.76 0.58 0.00 7.42
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3470A7.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3470A7.txt
  • (2.77) Cross-owned radio and newspaper 239.6* (1.73) 285.2** (2.29) 258.3** (2.57) 210.2** (2.30) Parent company coverage of all television households (%) 12.0*** (3.39) 10.4*** (3.40) 5.3* (1.87) Network owned and operated -129.1 (1.52) -175.0* (1.89) -68.4 (0.83) Network affiliation (omitted category is CW\MyNetwork) ABC 33.6 (0.34) 276.4*** (3.51) CBS -42.0 (0.43) 234.3*** (2.94) FOX 276.0** (2.54) 157.4* (1.94) NBC -52.7** (0.51) 225.8*** (2.74) Other control variables Time and length of broadcast fixed effects No No No No Yes DMA and date fixed effects Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Adjusted R-squared .35 .41 .46 .60 .66 Notes: Absolute values of t-statistics in parentheses (using heteroscedastic-consistent standard errors corrected for clustering by television station); ***p<.01, **p<.05 and *p<.10. 38 Table 6: State and
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3470A8.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3470A8.txt
  • 434,441 20.0555.24 19.75 4.96 81 OtherServices(exceptpublic) 392,656 21.8559.04 15.35 3.76 AllNon-FarmBusinesses 5,524,563 16.5063.64 12.89 6.97 17 Table8:OwnershipbyRace(IncludingPublicFirms) Percent NAICSName HispanicWhiteBlackAmIndAsian 22 Utilities 0.39 44.38 0.52 0.41 0.66 23 Construction 3.45 93.98 1.20 0.66 1.01 31-33 Manufacturing 3.33 88.19 0.67 0.45 3.81 42 WholesaleTrade 3.58 85.31 0.56 0.23 7.07 44-45 RetailTrade 3.47 86.28 1.18 0.40 8.27 48-49 Transportation&Warehousing 5.29 88.82 2.82 0.51 1.98 51 Information 2.48 81.84 1.82 0.35 3.81 515112 RadioStations 3.06 76.84 3.58 0.14 1.87 515120 TVStations 3.66 53.98 2.96 0.00 3.65 511110 NewspaperPublishers 1.48 87.68 2.29 0.94 3.04 52 FinanceandInsurance 2.71 85.31 1.52 0.34 2.27 53 RealEstate,Rental,Leasing 2.18 86.35 0.95 0.24 3.24 54 Prof.,Scienti�c,Tech.Svcs. 2.66 89.79 1.51 0.45 4.12 55 Mgmt.ofCompanies 0.83 58.59 0.63 0.23 1.69 56 Admin.Support,Waste Mgmt.,RemediationSvc.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4010A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4010A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4010A1.txt
  • Hato Rey, PR, 00918 Robert G. Nelson Chief, Satellite Division International Bureau Federal Communications Commission 445 12th Street, S.W., Room 6-A665 Washington, DC 20554 We issue this show cause order pursuant to Sections 312(c) and 9(c)(3) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. �� 312(c), 159(c)(3), Sections 1.91 and 1.1164(f) of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.91, 1.1164(f), and Sections 0.51(c), 0.51(d), and 0.261(a)(15) of the Commission's Rules on delegations of authority, 47 C.F.R.�� 0.51(c), 0.51(d), 0.261(a)(15). Sincerely, Robert G. Nelson Chief, Satellite Division International Bureau cc: Keller and Heckman, LLC 1001 G Street, N.W., Suite 500 West Washington, DC 20001 Section 23.49 requires licensees to provide notification of discontinuances in operation to "the Engineer in Charge of the district where
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4715A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4715A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4715A1.txt
  • of the following: Phillip Spector Executive Vice President and General Counsel Intelsat Holdings, Ltd. Wellesley House North, 2nd Floor 90 Pitts Bay Road Pembroke, HM 08, Bermuda and Bert W. Rein Carl R. Frank Counsel to Intelsat North America LLC Wiley Rein LLP 1776 K Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20006. This action is taken under delegated authority pursuant to sections 0.51 and 0.261 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.51, 0.261. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Helen Domenici, Chief International Bureau Appendix A Authorizations and Orbital Locations Subject to the 2000 Intelsat Licensing Order Satellite (Call Sign) Orbital Location IS-701 (S2400) 180� E.L. - 178� E.L. - 177� E.L. - 176� E.L. IS-605 (S2394) 174� E.L. IS-602 (S2389) 157� E.L. IS-709 (S2396)
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-5106A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-5106A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-5106A1.txt
  • Rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 23.36, 23.45. Accordingly, the license issued to Broadcast Media Satellite, Inc. on September 22, 2000, to operate facilities in the International Fixed Public Radio Service is revoked. We issue this license revocation pursuant to Section 9(c)(3) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. � 159(c)(3), Section 1.1164(f) of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.1164(f), and Sections 0.51(c), 0.51(d), and 0.261(a)(15) of the Commission's Rules on delegations of authority, 47 C.F.R.�� 0.51(c), 0.51(d), 0.261(a)(15). Sincerely, Robert G. Nelson Chief, Satellite Division International Bureau Letter from Robert G. Nelson, Chief, Satellite Division, International Bureau, to Broadcast Media Satellite, Inc., DA 07-4010 (Sept. 24, 2007) (September 24 Letter). September 24 Letter at 2. September 24 Letter at 2-3. September 24
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-737A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-737A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-737A1.txt
  • of the Confidential Submission, under the terms of the Protective Order attached to this Order, once MSV has executed such Protective Order. 5. This Order is issued pursuant to Sections 4(i) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 154(i), Exception 4 of the Freedom of Information Act, 5 U.S.C. � 552(b)(4), and authority delegated under Sections 0.51 and 0.261 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.51, 0.261, and is effective upon its release. Federal Communications Commission Helen Domenici Chief Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C. 20554 In the Matter of Telenor Satellite, Inc. Stratos Communications, Inc. Satamatics, Inc. SkyWave Mobile Communications, Corp. SkyWave Mobile Communications, Inc. Request for Confidential Treatment ) ) ) ) )
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-444A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-444A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-444A1.txt
  • of the following: Phillip Spector Executive Vice President and General Counsel Intelsat Holdings, Ltd. Wellesley House North, 2nd Floor 90 Pitts Bay Road Pembroke, HM 08, Bermuda and Bert W. Rein Carl R. Frank Counsel to Intelsat North America LLC Wiley Rein LLP 1776 K Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20006. This action is taken under delegated authority pursuant to sections 0.51 and 0.261 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.51, 0.261. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Helen Domenici, Chief International Bureau Appendix A Authorizations and Orbital Locations Subject to the 2000 Intelsat Licensing Order Satellite (Call Sign) Orbital Location IS-701 (S2400) 180� E.L. - 178� E.L. - 177� E.L. - 176� E.L. IS-605 (S2394) 174� E.L. IS-602 (S2389) 157� E.L. IS-709 (S2396)
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1054A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1054A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1054A1.txt
  • WTB 2003). IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i), 4(j), 5(c), 214, and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151, 154(i), 154(j), 155(c), 214, and 254, and pursuant to the authority delegated in sections 0.91, 0.291, and 63.03 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, and 63.03, and sections 0.51 and 0.261 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.51, 0.261, grant of the applications is conditioned upon Applicants' compliance with the commitment that PTI Pacifica will not raise its 1+ presubscribed wireline rates for three years from the date of this Order. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to sections 4(i)-(j), 214, 309, and 310(b) and (d) of the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1054A1_Rcd.pdf
  • WTB 2003).224 72. ITIS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i), 4(j), 5(c), 214, and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151, 154(i), 154(j), 155(c), 214, and 254, and pursuant to the authority delegated in sections 0.91, 0.291, and 63.03 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, and 63.03, and sections 0.51 and 0.261 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R.�� 0.51, 0.261, grant of the applications is conditioned upon Applicants' compliance with the commitment that PTI Pacifica will not raise its 1+ presubscribed wireline rates for three years from the date of this Order.225 73. ITIS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to sections 4(i)�(j), 214, 309, and 310(b) and (d) of the Communications
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1062A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1062A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1062A1.txt
  • 4. Accordingly, it is ordered that Row 44 SHALL provide to ViaSat a copy of the Ground Test Report under the terms of the appended Protective Order after ViaSat has executed the appended Acknowledgment of Confidentiality. 5. This Order is issued pursuant to Section 4(i) of the Communications Act, as amended, 47 U.S.C. � 154(i), and authority delegated under Sections 0.51 and 0.261 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.51 and 0.261, and is effective upon release. Federal Communications Commission John V. Giusti Acting Chief, International Bureau Appendix A: Protective Order Row 44 has agreed to provide to ViaSat, pursuant to the terms herein, an unredacted copy of the Report (hereafter the ``Confidential Report''). Consequently, the International Bureau (``Bureau'') has
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1062A1_Rcd.pdf
  • the public interest. 4. Accordingly, IT IS ORDEREDthat Row 44 SHALL provide to ViaSat a copyof the Ground Test Report under the terms of the appended Protective Order after ViaSat has executed theappended Acknowledgment of Confidentiality. 5. This Order is issued pursuant to Section 4(i) of the Communications Act, as amended, 47 U.S.C. � 154(i), and authority delegated under Sections 0.51 and 0.261 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.51 and0.261, and is effective upon release. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION John V. Giusti Acting Chief, International Bureau 1Letter dated Apr. 16, 2009 to Anthony Dale, Managing Director, from John P. Janka and Jarrett S.Taubman, Counsel for ViaSat, Inc. FOIA Control Number 2009-346. 2Letter with attachments dated Apr. 23, 2009 to Stephen
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1325A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1325A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1325A1.txt
  • release of this Order explaining the status of their attempts to have their circuits on the U.S.-Tonga route fully restored; This Order is issued pursuant to Sections 1, 2, 4(i)-(j), 5, 201-205, 211, 214, and 303(r), and 309 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151, 152, 154(i)-(j), 155, 201-205, 211, 214, 303(r), 309 and Sections 0.51, 0.261, 43.51, 63.14, 63.16, 64.1001 and 1.115 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.51, 0.261, 43.51, 63.14, 63.16, 64.1001, and is EFFECTIVE UPON RELEASE. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION John V. Giusti Acting Chief, International Bureau See International Settlements Policy Reform: International Settlement Rates, IB Docket Nos. 02-234 and 96-21, First Report and Order, 19 FCC Rcd 5709 (2004) (2004 ISP
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1325A1_Rcd.pdf
  • this Order explaining the status of their attempts to have their circuits on the U.S.- Tonga route fully restored; 61. This Order is issuedpursuant to Sections 1, 2, 4(i)-(j), 5, 201-205, 211, 214, and 303(r), and 309 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151, 152, 154(i)-(j), 155, 201- 205, 211, 214, 303(r), 309 and Sections 0.51, 0.261, 43.51, 63.14, 63.16, 64.1001 and1.115 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.51, 0.261, 43.51, 63.14, 63.16, 64.1001, and is EFFECTIVE UPON RELEASE. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION John V. Giusti Acting Chief, International Bureau 8025
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1624A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1624A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1624A1.txt
  • antenna gains based on the topocentric angles between the 99� W.L. Appendix F orbital location and the 103� W.L. Appendix F orbital location. Subtracting the second set of location-dependent antenna gain values from the first set, we find that the maximum potential PFD levels that could be provided from the 102.825� W.L. offset orbital location range from 0.47 dB to 0.51 dB less than those specified in Section 25.208(w), depending on the location on the surface of the Earth from which the angles between the orbital locations are measured. Accordingly, we will condition DIRECTV's license for the DIRECTV RB-2 space station on a reduction in PFD corresponding to the methodology described above. In no case shall the PFD levels for the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1624A1_Rcd.pdf
  • antenna gains based on the topocentric angles between the 99� W.L. Appendix F orbital location and the 103� W.L. Appendix F orbital location. Subtracting the second set of location- dependent antenna gain values from the first set, we find that the maximum potential PFD levels that could be provided fromthe 102.825� W.L. offset orbital location range from 0.47 dB to 0.51 dB less than 71Space Station Reform Order, 18 FCC Rcd at 10825 (para. 167); 47 C.F.R. � 25.165 (bond rule). 72Space Station Reform Order, 18 FCC Rcd at 10826 (para. 170). 73Space Station Reform Order, 18 FCC Rcd at 10826-27 (para. 172). 7447 C.F.R. � 25.140(b)(4)(iii). DIRECTV Amendment at 12-13 and n. 11. 75DIRECTV Amendment at 12-13 and n. 11.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2422A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2422A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2422A1.txt
  • Public Notice that AT&T's and Verizon's circuits on the U.S.-Tonga route are fully restored or otherwise ordered by the Commission; This Order is issued pursuant to Sections 1, 2, 4(i)-(j), 5, 201-205, 211, 214, and 303(r), and 309 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151, 152, 154(i)-(j), 155, 201-205, 211, 214, 303(r), 309 and Sections 0.51, 0.261, 43.51, 63.14, 63.16, 64.1001 and 1.115 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.51, 0.261, 43.51, 63.14, 63.16, 64.1001, 1.115, and is EFFECTIVE UPON RELEASE. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mindel De La Torre Chief, International Bureau Petition of AT&T Inc. for Settlements Stop Payment Order on the U.S.-Tonga Route, IB Docket No. 09-10, Order and Request for Further Comment, 24
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2422A1_Rcd.pdf
  • that AT&T's and Verizon's circuits on the U.S.-Tonga route are fully restored or otherwise ordered by the Commission; 20. This Order is issued pursuant to Sections 1, 2, 4(i)-(j), 5, 201-205, 211, 214, and 303(r), and 309 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151, 152, 154(i)-(j), 155, 201- 205, 211, 214, 303(r), 309 and Sections 0.51, 0.261, 43.51, 63.14, 63.16, 64.1001 and 1.115 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.51, 0.261, 43.51, 63.14, 63.16, 64.1001, 1.115, and is EFFECTIVE UPON RELEASE. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mindel De La Torre Chief, International Bureau 13775
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2548A1_Rcd.pdf
  • ITIS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 310(d)of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 154(i), 154(j), 310(d), that the Petition of Atlantic Tele-Network, Inc. to Deny or, Alternatively, to Grant with Conditions, and the Petition to Deny of Jeffrey B.C. Moorhead ARE DENIED. 28. This action is taken pursuant to delegated authority under Sections 0.51, 0.61, 0.91, 0.131, 0.204, 0.261, 0.283, 0.291, and 0.331, of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.51, 0.61, 0.91, 0.131, 204, 0.261, 0.283, 0.291, 0.331. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Sharon Gillett Chief Wireline Competition Bureau William T. Lake Chief Media Bureau Ruth Milkman Chief Wireless Telecommunications Bureau Mindel De La Torre Chief International Bureau 14373 Federal Communications Commission DA 09-2548 APPENDIX
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-53A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-53A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-53A1.txt
  • Governmental Access (PEG) Commercial Leased Access Other Channels Mean S.E. Mean S.E. Mean S.E. Mean S.E. Mean S.E. Sample groups overall 754 24.8 0.416 12.2 0.185 3.3 0.107 0.7 0.042 8.6 0.471 Noncompetitive Communities 434 24.9 0.470 12.4 0.209 3.3 0.121 0.7 0.047 8.5 0.532 Communities relieved from rate regulation 320 24.0 0.449 10.8 0.204 2.7 0.106 0.8 0.062 9.8 0.51 2nd cable operator subgroup (overall) 108 24.8 0.416 11.1 0.381 2.5 0.181 0.7 0.089 9.1 1.024 2nd cable operator subgroup (incumbents) 54 24.9 0.470 10.4 0.483 2.2 0.209 0.8 0.116 10.4 1.228 2nd cable operator subgroup (rivals) 54 24.0 0.449 13.3 0.498 3.3 0.359 0.3 0.087 5.3 1.806 DBS subgroup 125 24.7 0.661 10.6 0.280 2.9 0.141 0.9 0.097 10.3
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-639A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-639A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-639A1.txt
  • of time for the filing of comments from April 14, 2010, to April 21, 2010. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that pursuant to Section 1.46 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.46, Intelsat's request to extend the deadline for filing comments in this proceeding is GRANTED to the extent indicated. This action is taken under delegated authority pursuant to Sections 0.51 and 0.261 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.51, 0.261. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mindel De La Torre Chief International Bureau See Intelsat Request for Extension of Reply Comments Deadline (filed Apr. 12, 2010) (Intelsat Surreply Request). See also International Bureau Information: Report to Congress Regarding The Orbit Act, IB Docket No. 10-70, Public Notice, Report No. SPB-234, DA 10-448
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-639A1_Rcd.pdf
  • extension of time for the filing of comments from April 14, 2010, to April21,2010. 5. ITIS HEREBY ORDERED that pursuant to Section 1.46 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.46, Intelsat's request to extend the deadline for filing comments in this proceeding is GRANTED to the extent indicated. 6. This action is taken under delegated authority pursuant to Sections 0.51 and 0.261 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.51, 0.261. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mindel De La Torre Chief International Bureau 5Id. at 2. 6SeeRequest for Leave to File Surreply (filed Apr. 13, 2010) (Surreply Request). 7Id. 8Id.(emphasis in original). The Surreply Requestremains pending. 9See47 C.F.R. � 1.46(a). 3708
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-681A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-681A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-681A1.txt
  • a timely submission to Congress. Accordingly, interested parties have until April 28, 2010 to file their responses. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that pursuant to Section 1.46 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.46, ARTEL and Globecomm's request to file surreplies in this proceeding is GRANTED to the extent indicated. This action is taken under delegated authority pursuant to Sections 0.51 and 0.261 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.51, 0.261. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mindel De La Torre Chief International Bureau International Bureau Report to Congress Regarding The Orbit Act, Order Extending Comment Period, DA-10-639A1, IB Docket No. 10-70 (April 14, 2010). See Request for Leave to File Surreply (filed Apr. 13, 2010) (Surreply Request). (continued....) Federal Communications Commission DA
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-681A1_Rcd.pdf
  • of a timely submission to Congress. Accordingly, interested parties have until April28,2010 to file their responses. 3. ITIS HEREBY ORDERED that pursuant to Section 1.46 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.46, ARTEL and Globecomm's request to file surreplies in this proceeding is GRANTED to the extent indicated. 4. This action is taken under delegated authority pursuant to Sections 0.51 and 0.261 of the 1International Bureau Report to Congress Regarding The Orbit Act,Order Extending Comment Period, DA-10- 639A1, IB Docket No. 10-70 (April 14, 2010). 2SeeRequest for Leave to File Surreply (filed Apr. 13, 2010) (Surreply Request). 3886 Federal Communications Commission DA 10-681 Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.51, 0.261. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mindel De La Torre Chief International Bureau
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1907A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1907A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1907A1.txt
  • Application will serve the public interest, convenience, and necessity, subject to certain conditions and reporting and compliance procedures specified below. Ordering clauses Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to sections 4(i) and (j), 201, 202, 210, 211, and 214 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 154(i), (j), 201, 202, 210, 211, and 214, and sections 0.51, 0.261, 43.51, 43.61, 43.82, 63.18, 63.21, 63.22 and 63.23, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.51, 0.261, 43.51, 43.61, 43.82, 63.18, 63.21, 63.22 and 63.23, the Application filed by T.A. Resources N.V. for section 214 authority IS GRANTED to the extent specified in this Order and Authorization. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that T.A. Resources N.V.'s request for an affirmative finding that Aruba provides
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1907A1_Rcd.pdf
  • will serve the public interest, convenience, and necessity, subject to certain conditions and reporting and compliance procedures specified below. V. ORDERINGCLAUSES 25. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to sections 4(i) and (j), 201, 202, 210, 211, and 214 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 154(i), (j), 201, 202, 210, 211, and 214, and sections 0.51, 0.261, 43.51, 43.61, 43.82, 63.18, 63.21, 63.22 and 63.23, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.51, 0.261, 43.51, 43.61, 43.82, 63.18,63.21, 63.22 and 63.23, the Application filed by T.A. Resources N.V. for section 214 authority IS GRANTED to the extentspecified in this Order and Authorization. 26. ITIS FURTHER ORDERED that T.A. Resources N.V.'s request for an affirmative finding that Aruba provides effective competitive
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-284A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-284A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-284A1.txt
  • Group Video Programming Service January 1, 2009 January 1, 2008 n Mean Standard Error n Mean Standard Error Sample groups overall Basic service 762 $17.65 0.26 738 $16.52 0.24 Cable programming 762 $34.72 0.37 738 $32.92 0.35 Expanded basic service 762 $52.37 0.23 738 $49.43 0.23 Noncompetitive Communities Basic service 349 $17.88 0.36 326 $16.87 0.34 Cable programming 349 $34.21 0.51 326 $32.45 0.49 Expanded basic service 349 $52.10 0.33 326 $49.31 0.33 All Effective Competition Communities Basic service 413 $17.16 0.26 412 $15.81 0.24 Cable programming 413 $35.80 0.34 412 $33.87 0.30 Expanded basic service 413 $52.96 0.20 412 $49.68 0.19 Second operator subgroup (all) Basic service 140 $16.05 0.30 140 $15.03 0.27 Cable programming 140 $35.53 0.42 140 $33.10
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-654A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-654A1.txt
  • ETECSA. Otherwise, all aspects of the ISP continue be in full force and effect. V. ORDERING CLAUSES 35. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to sections 1, 2, 4(i) and (j), 201, 202, 210, 211, and 214 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151, 152, 154(i) and (j), 201, 202, 210, 211, 214 and sections 0.51, 0.261, 43.51, 43.61, 43.82, 63.14, 64.1001 and 64.1002, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.51, 0.261, 43.51, 43.61, 43.82, 63.14, 64.1001 and 64.1002, the Petition for Waiver filed by IConnect Wholesale, Inc., d/b/a/ TeleCuba for a three-year waiver of the applicable benchmark rate to the U.S.-Cuba route IS GRANTED to the extent specified and as conditioned in this Memorandum Opinion and Order. 36.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-654A1_Rcd.pdf
  • ETECSA. Otherwise, all aspects of the ISP continue be in full force and effect. V. ORDERING CLAUSES 35. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to sections 1, 2, 4(i) and (j), 201, 202, 210, 211, and 214 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151, 152, 154(i) and (j), 201, 202, 210, 211, 214 and sections 0.51, 0.261, 43.51, 43.61, 43.82, 63.14, 64.1001 and 64.1002, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.51, 0.261, 43.51, 43.61, 43.82, 63.14, 64.1001 and 64.1002, the Petition for Waiver filed by IConnect Wholesale, Inc., d/b/a/ TeleCuba for a three-year waiver of the applicable benchmark rate to the U.S.-Cuba route IS GRANTED to the extentspecified and as conditioned in this Memorandum Opinion and Order. 36. IT
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-121A2_Rcd.pdf
  • 84 32 8 39,838 39,191 47.32 2,811.93 44,163.47 3,634.68 6.31 6.16 0.21 2,982.89 180.79 NV 11,368 67 44 15 7 7,185 48,185 0.00 1,363.47 38,322.48 7,325.42 20.09 18.92 16.42 229.91 0.33 NY 11,920 473 236 44 16 77,271 6,967 10.02 878.79 6,747.51 704.34 5.19 2.43 0.00 1,012.80 14.74 OH 10,440 332 161 40 18 95,918 2,950 0.01 1,038.37 5,920.80 107.09 0.51 2.06 2.70 465.77 42.58 OK 5,738 171 116 54 15 15,802 4,060 6.75 340.17 6,772.07 546.38 0.93 0.19 0.00 440.44 14.10 OR 30,470 299 159 36 10 28,342 26,833 0.00 996.98 51,904.03 2,986.77 0.92 3,652.17 0.39 512.72 11.67 Attachment A: Summary of Preliminary List of Potentially Eligible Census Blocks DA 12 121 Unserved Road Miles by Category State/ Territory Tota
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-187A2_Rcd.pdf
  • 94 33 8 39,829 35,478 91.31 2,468.50 39,345.62 3,278.31 14.08 11.94 0.61 3,100.36 168.10 NV 9,621 66 43 15 7 5,164 46,217 5.98 1,248.82 35,328.96 6,815.98 19.16 18.80 1.00 209.36 0.33 NY 13,597 557 265 45 16 88,802 7,749 12.62 980.12 7,822.03 777.91 3.61 3.67 0.00 1,129.18 17.62 OH 10,162 341 163 44 21 91,349 2,783 0.01 986.23 5,647.98 84.87 0.51 2.01 2.77 408.64 41.91 OK 5,395 156 109 52 14 14,343 3,849 7.12 319.30 6,410.31 544.99 0.66 0.19 0.00 405.79 13.68 OR 31,034 303 161 36 10 29,931 27,462 0.73 1,043.19 53,274.71 3,025.52 0.92 3,797.71 0.39 560.46 12.84 Attachment A: Summary of Updated List of Potentially Eligible Census Blocks DA 12 187 Unserved Road Miles by Category State/ Territory Tota
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-2A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-2A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-2A1.txt
  • Number of FM stations in contour -0.000 (0.01) -0.001 (0.02) 0.002 (0.05) Number of commercial TV stations 0.027 (0.30) 0.030 (0.33) 0.033 (0.36) Number of digital radio stations in market 0.015 (1.11) 0.020 (1.46) 0.016 (1.18) Number of newspapers in market -0.232 (2.25)* -0.249 (2.40)* -0.228 (2.22)* Population 18+ -0.000 (1.16) -0.000 (0.97) -0.000 (0.90) Retail expenditures in market -0.000 (0.51) 0.000 (0.08) -0.000 (0.23) Per capita income in market -0.000 (1.70) -0.000 (2.24)* -0.000 (2.14)* 2007-2009 time effect -0.301 (3.64)** -0.304 (3.64)** -0.299 (3.64)** Constant -0.058 (0.86) -0.059 (0.87) -0.051 (0.76) * - estimated regression coefficient is different from zero at the 95 percent level of confidence. ** - estimated regression coefficient is different from zero at the 99 percent
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-500A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-500A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-500A1.txt
  • Technology Partners, fiber providers; PRWireless, Inc., a non-dominant fixed wireless provider based in Puerto Rico; Sparkplug Central, Inc., Sparkplug Inc., Sparkplug Las Vegas, Inc. and Sparkplug Southwest, LLC, fixed wireless broadband providers; and Triad 700, LLC, a 700 MHz provider. Mr. Wade and Mr. Croll are also two of the five managers of M/C Venture Investors, L.L.C., which has a 0.51 percent direct interest in CII. Certain of the Managing Members of M/C Venture Partners, LLC are affiliated with Cleveland Unlimited, LLC, a non-dominant wireless local and long distance telecommunications service in Cleveland, Ohio, and TX-11 Acquisition, LLC, a non-dominant wireless carrier based in Lufkin, Texas. The general partner of Columbia is Columbia Capital IV, LLC, which holds a 17 percent
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-567A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-567A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-567A1.txt
  • Technology Partners, fiber providers; PRWireless, Inc., a non-dominant fixed wireless provider based in Puerto Rico; Sparkplug Central, Inc., Sparkplug Inc., Sparkplug Las Vegas, Inc. and Sparkplug Southwest, LLC, fixed wireless broadband providers; and Triad 700, LLC, a 700 MHz provider. Mr. Wade and Mr. Croll are also two of the five managers of M/C Venture Investors, L.L.C., which has a 0.51 percent direct interest in CII. Certain of the Managing Members of M/C Venture Partners, LLC are affiliated with Cleveland Unlimited, LLC, a non-dominant wireless local and long distance telecommunications service in Cleveland, Ohio, and TX-11 Acquisition, LLC, a non-dominant wireless carrier based in Lufkin, Texas. The general partner of Columbia is Columbia Capital IV, LLC, will hold a 15.26 percent
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-646A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-646A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-646A1.txt
  • 0.04 0.13 0.60 0.05 0.11 0.25 0.08 0.04 0.28 0.03 -0.19 -0.10 LnCapex 0.88 1.00 0.80 0.59 0.69 -0.14 0.32 0.09 0.60 0.06 0.11 0.15 0.0 5 0.02 0.23 -0.03 -0.08 -0.17 LnLoops 0.87 0.80 1.00 0.52 0.67 0.03 -0.13 0.34 0.58 -0.05 0.08 0.14 0. 00 -0.02 0.35 -0.03 -0.13 0.04 LnRoadMiles 0.58 0.59 0.52 1.00 0.94 -0.13 -0.01 -0.51 0.79 0.07 0.13 -0 .05 0.04 0.06 -0.06 -0.02 -0.13 -0.22 LnRoadCrossings 0.70 0.69 0.67 0.94 1.00 -0.12 -0.04 -0.26 0.76 0.06 0.1 4 0.09 0.03 -0.02 0.10 -0.10 -0.15 -0.21 LnStateSACs -0.12 -0.14 0.03 -0.13 -0.12 1.00 -0.26 0.16 -0.08 -0.05 0.0 5 -0.17 -0.07 -0.01 0.05 -0.04 0.12 0.13 PctUnDepPlant 0.04 0.32 -0.13 -0.01 -0.04 -0.26 1.00 -0.10
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-861A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-861A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-861A1.txt
  • DIRECTV's application was substantially complete, and that the proposed PFD met the limits in Section 25.208(w) of the Commission's rules. In addition, to ensure that DIRECTV's offset operations do not cause any additional interference to a satellite operating at the adjacent Appendix F location, the Bureau imposed a license condition limiting DIRECTV RB-2's operating power to between 0.47 dB and 0.51 dB less than full power, the precise amount depending on the surface location on Earth of a given measurement point. Before us now is Spectrum Five's August 27, 2009 petition for reconsideration of the DIRECTV RB-2 Order. In its petition for reconsideration, Spectrum Five argues that the Bureau inappropriately licensed DIRECTV to operate an over-powered space station. Spectrum Five also
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-97-1409A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-97-1409A1.txt
  • for duplicative pleadings, reduce the burden on all parties to the proceeding, and conserve Commission resources. 9723 4. This action is taken pursuant to authority' found in Sections 4(i) and 303 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 154(i) and 303; and pursuant to Sections 0.5], 0.261 and 1.48 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.51, 0.261 and 1.48. Accordingly, IT IS "ORDERED that the OEMS Licensees may exceed the 25-page limitation in a consolidated opposition to petitions for reconsideration or clarification filed in the above captioned proceeding. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Peter F. (Sowney Chief, Internation Bureau 9724
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-98-1305A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-98-1305A1.txt
  • to file a response to TMI's opposition. Therefore, we extend the date to file responses to the Opposition to Petitions to Deny TMI's application until June 29, 1998. 4. This action is taken pursuant to the authority found in Sections 4(i) and 303 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. � 154(i) 303; and pursuant to Sections 0.51, 0.261, 1.46 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � � 0.51, 0.261, 1.46. 5. Accordingly, Norcom Networks Corporation's Request for Extension of Time is GRANTED and the deadline for filing responses to TMI Communications and Company, L.P.'s Opposition to Petitions to Deny is EXTENDED from June 25, 1998 to June 29, 1998. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION ^ ''// , ) Thomas
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-99-219A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-99-219A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-99-219A1.txt
  • which to file a response to PanAmSat's opposition. Therefore, we extend the date to file responses to the Petitions to Deny of TUPR's application until February 4, 1999. 4. This action is taken pursuant to the authority found in Sections 4(i) and 303 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. � 154(i) 303; and pursuant to Sections 0.51, 0.261, 1.46 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � � 0.51, 0.261, 1.46. 5. Accordingly, TUPR's Request for Extension of Time is GRANTED and the deadline for filing responses to PanAmSat's Petitions to Deny is EXTENDED from January 21, 1999 to February 4, 1999. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Thomas S. Tycz Chief, Satellite and Radiocommication Division, International Bureau Federal Communications Commission
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-208380A7.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-208380A7.txt
  • 35,134 1,677 45,492 29,283 0.24 0.57 0.65 0.73 1 5 5 5 5Germany 9,261 21,484 541 31,286 13,521 0.42 0.76 0.64 0.83 1 6 8 13 8Netherlands 1,831 20,687 30 22,548 17,721 0.09 0.34 0.58 0.56 8 7 7 6 7Australia 2,521 14,830 347 17,698 6,060 0.17 0.65 0.97 0.92 1 8 9 7 6France 5,346 8,390 2,010 15,746 4,474 0.51 1.67 0.95 0.99 7 9 11 10 10Hong Kong 1,313 9,767 264 11,344 4,229 0.13 0.26 0.42 0.52 7 10 10 8 9Korea, South 2,678 7,289 35 10,002 5,178 0.37 0.56 0.59 0.98 1 11 6 9 15Sweden 3,198 6,568 0 9,766 1,806 0.49 0.28 0.30 0.60 6 12 12 11 11Brazil 1,939 7,556 221 9,716 1,505 0.25 0.58 0.64
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-215526A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-215526A1.txt
  • multiplied by five and added to multiline business counts. 1 - 7 Table 1.4 Interstate Per-Minute Access Charges by Carrier (In Cents per Minute) 1/ Rates Effective from 7/1/01-12/31/01 Year 2000 Minutes of Use Carrier (Millions) Common Line per Company Originating Access CCL CCL Local Minute OriginatingTerminatingSwitching BellSouth 0.00� 0.00� 0.36� 0.18� 1.10� 27,845 57,012 83,187 Cincinnati Bell 0.00 0.00 0.51 0.21 1.49 1,042 2,162 3,215 Citizens 0.57 0.00 0.87 0.65 3.69 2,747 2,865 5,680 Global Crossing 0.05 0.00 0.61 0.41 2.15 575 1,583 2,160 Iowa Telecom 0.81 0.00 0.84 0.15 2.90 134 185 331 Qwest 0.00 0.00 0.54 0.18 1.47 21,018 39,686 61,107 SBC 0.00 0.00 0.43 0.21 1.30 64,610 92,623 158,985 Sprint 0.03 0.00 0.63 0.17 1.68 10,375 15,681
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-226838A8.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-226838A8.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-226838A8.txt
  • 2.03 AC/Full Service (FS) 1 0.02 AC/NR 42 0.67 AC/Oldies (O) 5 0.09 AC/SAC 8 0.13 AOR 565 10.32 AOR 375 5.94 AOR/AC 5 0.09 AOR/AC 3 0.05 Black (B) 281 5.13 AOR/NR 200 3.17 B/AC 13 0.24 AOR/P 80 1.27 B/Gospel (G) 4 0.07 B 236 3.74 B/O 3 0.05 B/AC 107 1.69 B/Talk (T) 4 0.07 B/G 32 0.51 Big Band/Nostalgia (BB) 213 3.89 B/O 26 0.41 BB/EZ 7 0.13 B/T 6 0.1 BB/FS 5 0.09 BB 315 4.99 BB/O 1 0.02 BB/EZ 3 0.05 Country (C) 772 14.1 BB/REL 1 0.02 C/FS 20 0.37 BB/T 1 0.02 CHR 488 8.91 C 904 14.32 CHR/AC 15 0.27 C/FS 14 0.22 CHR/Spanish (SP) 3 0.05 CHR 410 6.49 CHR/Urban (U)
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-228584A3.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-228584A3.txt
  • Split Split Split Split 1 1 1 1 2United Kingdom 42,226 586,542 40,474 669,242 1,792,488 0.07 0.07 0.22 0.32 5 2 2 2 1Canada 140,285 307,235 18,531 466,051 453,261 0.43 0.26 0.72 1.02 7 3 3 3 3Mexico 71,216 157,033 1,260 229,509 203,352 0.45 0.62 1.00 1.38 5 4 4 4 4Japan 10,764 148,766 13,845 173,375 238,051 0.07 0.09 0.16 0.51 1 5 7 6 7Australia 5,845 45,285 46,665 97,795 47,967 0.06 0.09 0.11 0.63 1 6 5 5 5Germany 12,472 69,456 1,791 83,719 16,318 0.18 0.12 0.37 0.76 8 7 6 7 8Netherlands 3,497 50,459 12,140 66,096 87,231 0.06 0.05 0.09 0.34 7 8 8 10 10Korea, South 2,807 59,417 2,260 64,484 8,188 0.05 0.08 0.29 0.56 6 9 10
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-231851A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-231851A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-231851A1.txt
  • 0.82 0.09 ATC Transmitter Out-of-Band Power (dBW/4kHz) -100.6 -119.6 Bandwidth Ratio (dB) 36.0 36.0 ATC Emission (dBW/Hz) -136.6 -155.6 Propagation Loss (dB/m2) -97.5 -78.5 Interference Power (dBW/Hz) -234.1 -234.1 Normalized Interference Level (dBW/Hz) -234.1 -234.1 Margin (dB) 0.0 0.0 These errors will be corrected before publication in the Federal Register. This action is taken under delegated authority pursuant to Sections 0.51 and 0.261 of the Commissions Rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.51, 0.261. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION James Ball Chief, Policy Division International Bureau (...continued from previous page) (continued....) Federal Communications Commission Federal Communications Commission ' � � � � � ' � � � � ' � � � � ��� (c)��� ���� _��� \ \ S��� F * , � �
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-242532A8.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-242532A8.txt
  • 7,151 0.83 0.18 0.27 3.29 1 16 16 13 12Sweden 4,887 29,207 32 34,126 2,080 0.17 0.14 0.18 0.49 6 17 12 9 11Brazil 5,724 19,547 6,570 31,841 42,929 0.22 0.11 0.09 0.24 7 18 15 15 15Taiwan 2,201 27,413 1 29,615 14,811 0.08 0.06 0.12 0.29 1 19 14 11 8France 13,738 5,778 7,561 27,077 6,581 1.03 0.38 0.29 0.51 7 20 19 26 20India 3,529 23,029 0 26,558 3,121 0.15 0.18 0.40 0.46 7 21 20 20 19Philippines 10,642 8,814 634 20,090 10,754 1.13 1.16 1.11 1.59 6 22 23 21 24Colombia 4,008 6,851 5,220 16,079 2,911 0.33 0.32 0.31 0.58 6 23 22 23 21Venezuela 3,086 5,886 3,717 12,689 20,365 0.32 0.22 0.38 0.70 8 24 21 22
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-249262A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-249262A1.txt
  • 0.56 0.38 1987 4,819.2 4,751.1 3,422.9 1,328.2 2,822.7 1,670.6 0.99 0.71 0.28 0.59 0.39 1988 5,679.4 5,806.3 4,039.1 1,767.2 3,228.2 1,906.3 1.02 0.71 0.31 0.59 0.41 1989 6,750.7 6,912.3 4,735.4 2,176.9 3,810.3 2,212.7 1.02 0.70 0.32 0.58 0.42 1990 8,029.7 8,059.0 5,297.4 2,761.6 4,340.9 2,426.3 1.00 0.66 0.34 0.56 0.42 1991 9,071.7 9,263.2 5,852.4 3,410.8 4,768.6 2,410.4 1.02 0.65 0.38 0.51 0.42 1992 10,293.8 10,382.5 6,007.7 4,374.8 5,369.7 2,481.2 1.01 0.58 0.42 0.46 0.44 1993 11,513.3 11,563.7 6,372.0 5,191.7 5,786.0 2,476.7 1.00 0.55 0.45 0.43 0.44 1994 13,615.6 12,542.9 7,009.7 5,533.2 6,384.9 2,501.8 0.92 0.51 0.41 0.39 0.40 1995 15,888.8 14,335.4 7,569.0 6,766.4 7,050.6 2,464.1 0.90 0.48 0.43 0.35 0.40 1996 19,325.1 14,597.8 8,252.3 6,345.5 8,293.2 2,450.9 0.76 0.43 0.33 0.30
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-255118A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-255118A1.txt
  • in any given year, because 1.5 .22 e-= . If a network began before 1984, then that network has 64% greater chance of surviving in any given year. 24 TABLE 7 SEMI-PARAMETRIC SURVIVAL ESTIMATES (Z-statistics in parentheses) Cox Proportional Hazard (With Stratification by Sports and Shopping Genres) Piecewise-Constant Hazard (No Stratification) Millions of Subs -0.06*** (4.96) -0.17*** (6.73) Missing Subs -0.51** (2.21) -2.10** (2.12) Vertical Integration 0.00 (0.07) -0.01 (1.15) Spinoff -1.21** (2.40) -1.50*** (2.95) Missing Vertical or Spinoff 0.26 (1.23) -0.22 (1.22) Born before 1984 -0.74 (1.62) -1.08** (2.01) Duration 2 years -1.03*** (3.91) Duration 3 years -0.93*** (3.36) Duration 4 years -0.49* (1.91) Duration 5 years -0.82** (2.43) Duration 6 years -1.92*** (3.23) Duration 7 years -0.44 (1.25) Duration
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-255869A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-255869A1.txt
  • partial R-Squared, because the estimation includes only one endogenous variable. See Baum, Schaeffer, and Stillman (2003). 17 TABLE 2 SECOND SPECIFICATION: DBS PENETRATION AND STRATIFIED QUALITY-ADJUSTED CABLE PRICE THE FULL MODEL REGRESSION COEFFICIENTS AND GOODNESS OF FIT STATISTICS (t-statistics in parentheses) Variable Estimated Coefficient t Statistic PLUSTENDROP -1.12 (0.32) NEG10TO10 0.91 (0.58) PLUS10RISE 14.21** (2.10) LPREM 0.06 (0.30) CABINT 0.15 (0.51) CABREGSPORT -0.36 (1.37) CABFOREIGN 0.19 (0.75) CABHIDEF -0.51* (1.82) LNOVERAIR -0.19 (0.83) LNLAT -1.54** (2.29) LPOVERTY -0.22** (2.15) LMULTDWELL -0.15 (1.30) DBSOVERAIR 0.41* (1.74) Constant 4.89* (1.88) Observations 525 F-Statistic 2.05** Hansen J Statistic 6.97* ** - significant at 95% confidence level, * - significant at 90% confidence level First Stage Diagnostics F-Statistic Centered R2 Partial R2 Shea Partial R2
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-256000A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-256000A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-256000A1.txt
  • 47 C.F.R. � 2.106, is revised by (a) placing footnotes 5.457A and 5.457B in numeric order in the International Table for the bands 14-14.25 GHz, 14.25-14.3 GHz and 14.3-14.4 GHz; and (b) adding a reference to footnote NG184 in the non-Federal Government Table for the band 14.2-14.47 GHz. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that this Erratum IS ISSUED pursuant to Sections 0.51 and 0.261 of the Commission's rules on delegated authority, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.51, 0.261, and that these corrections SHALL BE INCLUDED in the Report and Order prior to its publication in the Federal Register and FCC Record. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Donald Abelson, Chief International Bureau (...continued from previous page) (continued....) Federal Communications Commission Federal Communications Commission DA 05-XXX \ �
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-258809A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-258809A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-258809A1.txt
  • of its Cable Operations And Licensing System (COALS) to Allow for Electronic Filing of Licensing Applications, Forms, Registrations, and Notifications in the Multichannel Video and Cable Television Service and the Cable Television Relay Service, CS Docket No. 00-78, Report and Order, FCC 03-55, 18 FCC Rcd 5162 (2003). Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that this Erratum IS ISSUED pursuant to Sections 0.51 and 0.261 of the Commission's rules on delegated authority, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.51, 0.261, and that these corrections SHALL BE INCLUDED in the Report and Order prior to its publication in the Federal Register and FCC Record. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION James L. Ball, Chief Policy Division International Bureau The underlying document was mislabeled IB Docket No. 04-426. (...continued from previous
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-259748A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-259748A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-259748A1.txt
  • entirety Public Notice (DA 05-1679) which was released on June 16, 2005. The corrected Public Notice reads as follows: Comment Date: July 18, 2005 By the Chief, Policy Division, International Bureau: We hereby request comment regarding our intention to remove the International Settlements Policy (ISP) from the U.S.-Cambodia route pursuant to the ISP Reform First Report and Order and sections 0.51 and 0.261 of the Commission's rules. On March 30, 2004, the Commission released the ISP Reform Order that revised its policy and rules to remove the International Settlements Policy from benchmark-compliant routes. In the ISP Reform Order, the Commission found that those routes that had not yet met the benchmarks standard would be added to the list of routes exempt
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-261024A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-261024A2.txt
  • 2,511.0 1,395.9 0.97 0.69 0.28 0.56 0.38 19874,819.2 4,751.1 3,422.9 1,328.2 2,822.7 1,670.6 0.99 0.71 0.28 0.59 0.39 19885,679.4 5,806.3 4,039.1 1,767.2 3,228.2 1,906.3 1.02 0.71 0.31 0.59 0.41 19896,750.7 6,912.3 4,735.4 2,176.9 3,810.3 2,212.7 1.02 0.70 0.32 0.58 0.42 19908,029.7 8,059.0 5,297.4 2,761.6 4,340.9 2,426.3 1.00 0.66 0.34 0.56 0.42 19919,071.7 9,263.2 5,852.4 3,410.8 4,768.6 2,410.4 1.02 0.65 0.38 0.51 0.42 199210,293.8 10,382.5 6,007.7 4,374.8 5,369.7 2,481.2 1.01 0.58 0.42 0.46 0.44 199311,513.3 11,563.7 6,372.0 5,191.7 5,786.0 2,476.7 1.00 0.55 0.45 0.43 0.44 199413,615.6 12,542.9 7,009.7 5,533.2 6,384.9 2,501.8 0.92 0.51 0.41 0.39 0.40 199515,888.8 14,335.4 7,569.0 6,766.4 7,050.6 2,464.1 0.90 0.48 0.43 0.35 0.40 199619,325.1 14,597.8 8,252.3 6,345.5 8,293.2 2,450.9 0.76 0.43 0.33 0.30 0.32 199722,753.1 15,661.6 8,031.0 7,630.5
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A1.txt
  • Michigan 1,384,973 NA 5.13 216 331 416 530 Minnesota 534,965 NA 1.98 83 128 161 205 Mississippi * 153,505 0.50 21 32 41 52 Missouri 334,319 NA 1.24 52 80 100 128 Montana * 22,314 0.07 3 5 6 8 Nebraska 190,754 NA 0.71 30 46 57 73 Nevada 132,684 NA 0.49 21 32 40 51 New Hampshire 136,510 NA 0.51 21 33 41 52 New Jersey 1,009,996 NA 3.74 157 242 303 387 New Mexico * 23,474 0.08 3 5 6 8 New York 3,478,918 NA 12.89 542 832 1,045 1,332 North Carolina 443,600 NA 1.64 69 106 133 170 North Dakota * 47,638 0.16 7 10 13 16 N. Mariana Islands NA NA NA NA NA NA NA Ohio
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A13.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A13.txt
  • - Contel - Washington WA (1,357) (1,247) (110) 8.11 Verizon - NW - Washington WA 488 560 (72) (14.75) Qwest - Washington WA (20,223) (19,870) (353) 1.75 Sprint - United Tel. Co. of the NW - Washington WA (124) (93) (30) 24.19 Verizon - West Virginia WV 9,795 9,986 (191) (1.95) Verizon - North - Wisconsin WI (2,765) (2,750) (14) 0.51 SBC - Ameritech - Wisconsin Bell WI 63,128 63,178 (50) (0.08) Qwest - Wyoming WY 1,290 1,326 (35) (2.71) 11 - 22 Table 11.11 Taxes (Federal, State, and Other) ($000) - 2004 Study Area State Subject to Percent Code Separations Intrastate Interstate Interstate All Reporting Local Exchange Companies $9,251,419 $4,625,090 $4,565,445 49.35% Bell Operating Companies 8,334,412 4,137,675 4,182,380 50.18 Other
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A3.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A3.txt
  • Michigan 1,384,973 NA 5.13 216 331 416 530 Minnesota 534,965 NA 1.98 83 128 161 205 Mississippi * 153,505 0.50 21 32 41 52 Missouri 334,319 NA 1.24 52 80 100 128 Montana * 22,314 0.07 3 5 6 8 Nebraska 190,754 NA 0.71 30 46 57 73 Nevada 132,684 NA 0.49 21 32 40 51 New Hampshire 136,510 NA 0.51 21 33 41 52 New Jersey 1,009,996 NA 3.74 157 242 303 387 New Mexico * 23,474 0.08 3 5 6 8 New York 3,478,918 NA 12.89 542 832 1,045 1,332 North Carolina 443,600 NA 1.64 69 106 133 170 North Dakota * 47,638 0.16 7 10 13 16 N. Mariana Islands NA NA NA NA NA NA NA Ohio
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A4.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A4.txt
  • 8.25 8.25 8.25 Ohio 7.09 8.25 7.40 0.00 3.50 2.87 0.00 1.75 1.43 7.09 10.00 8.83 7.09 13.50 11.70 Oklahoma 7.02 8.25 7.21 0.00 1.22 0.45 0.00 0.61 0.23 7.02 8.86 7.44 7.02 10.08 7.89 Oregon 7.75 8.25 8.25 3.50 3.50 3.50 1.75 1.75 1.75 9.50 10.00 10.00 13.00 13.50 13.50 Pennsylvania 5.94 8.25 7.85 0.00 2.50 1.03 0.00 1.25 0.51 5.94 9.50 8.37 5.94 12.00 9.39 Puerto Rico 8.25 8.25 8.25 3.34 3.50 3.35 1.67 1.75 1.67 9.92 10.00 9.92 13.26 13.50 13.27 Rhode Island 8.19 8.20 8.20 0.00 3.40 3.31 0.00 1.70 1.65 8.19 9.90 9.85 8.19 13.30 13.16 South Carolina 7.50 8.25 8.23 0.00 3.50 3.49 0.00 1.75 1.74 7.50 10.00 9.98 7.50 13.50 13.46 South Dakota 5.25
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A5.txt
  • 0.61 0.16 2.47 Connecticut 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.03 0.02 0.08 Delaware 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.04 0.00 0.04 Dist. of Columbia 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Florida 0.08 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.06 0.45 0.03 0.64 Georgia 0.71 0.01 0.00 0.16 0.46 0.27 0.26 1.87 Guam 3.41 0.00 0.00 0.65 1.10 0.00 0.00 5.16 Hawaii 0.51 (0.00) 0.00 0.01 0.47 0.24 0.13 1.36 Idaho 2.40 0.01 0.00 0.21 0.74 1.80 0.90 6.06 Illinois 0.13 0.00 0.00 0.03 0.13 0.13 0.13 0.55 Indiana 0.19 0.00 0.00 0.06 0.22 0.56 0.19 1.23 Iowa 0.72 0.05 0.00 0.23 1.13 0.28 1.05 3.47 Kansas 3.26 0.03 0.00 0.29 1.42 0.38 0.67 6.06 Kentucky 0.69 0.01 0.62 0.10 0.47 0.64 0.18
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-266857A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-266857A1.txt
  • 525 Funds, trusts, and other financial vehicles 87,984.5 74.2 0.08 0.01 531 Real estate 1,806,953.7 7,789.5 0.43 1.39 532RL Rental and leasing services and lessors of intangible asset 299,340.3 3,104.6 1.04 0.55 5411 Legal services 231,609.0 4,560.9 1.97 0.81 5412OP Miscellaneous professional, scientific and technical service 1,011,462.4 21,664.0 2.14 3.87 5415 Computer systems design and related services 248,485.4 2,840.7 1.14 0.51 55 Management of companies and enterprises 336,552.0 12,099.1 3.60 2.16 561 Administrative and support services 493,259.7 9,619.1 1.95 1.72 562 Waste management and remediation services 64,537.4 642.7 1.00 0.11 61 Educational services 231,735.0 2,773.0 1.20 0.49 621 Ambulatory health care services 634,330.8 9,427.0 1.49 1.68 622HO Hospitals and nursing and residential care facilitie 688,480.5 10,451.2 1.52 1.87 624 Social assistance
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A1.txt
  • Information for Allocating CLEC Revenues: 2004 (Dollars in Millions) CLEC Allocation Interstate InterstateIntrastateIntrastate Lines Percentage End-User Total End-User Total Jun 04 1/ Revenues RevenuesRevenuesRevenues Alabama 365,060 NA 1.14% $53 $73 $96 $121 Alaska NA NA NA NA NA NA NA American Samoa NA NA NA NA NA NA NA Arizona 814,194 NA 2.54 119 163 214 270 Arkansas 162,996 NA 0.51 24 33 43 54 California 3,774,501 NA 11.78 553 757 991 1,253 Colorado 498,583 NA 1.56 73 100 131 165 Connecticut 272,385 NA 0.85 40 55 71 90 Delaware * 81,498 0.28 13 18 24 30 District of Columbia 215,421 NA 0.67 32 43 57 72 Florida 1,785,001 NA 5.57 262 358 469 593 Georgia 977,358 NA 3.05 143 196
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A13.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A13.txt
  • Valor Telecommunications of Texas - Oklahoma OK 109,100 71,021 38,699 35.47 6.53 Verizon Northwest - Oregon OR 313,578 213,969 115,632 36.88 1.20 Qwest - Oregon OR 868,492 637,054 256,259 29.51 (0.49) ALLTEL of Pennsylvania PA 155,782 109,865 46,844 30.07 41.26 Verizon North - Contel/Pennsylania PA 6,567 2,989 9,495 144.59 31.78 Verizon North - Contel/Quaker State PA 14,816 9,363 6,485 43.77 0.51 Verizon North - Pennsylvania PA 135,703 83,077 104,272 76.84 (46.06) Verizon Pennsylvania PA 2,614,669 1,776,687 1,017,366 38.91 3.21 Sprint - United Telephone Co. of Pennsylvania PA 168,071 135,361 39,081 23.25 41.22 Verizon - Puerto Rico Telephone Company - Central PR 56,477 42,237 14,836 26.27 (27.80) Verizon - Puerto Rico Telephone Company PR 392,465 277,337 119,569 30.47 35.28 Verizon New England
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A3.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A3.txt
  • Information for Allocating CLEC Revenues: 2004 (Dollars in Millions) CLEC Allocation Interstate InterstateIntrastateIntrastate Lines Percentage End-User Total End-User Total Jun 04 1/ Revenues RevenuesRevenuesRevenues Alabama 365,060 NA 1.14% $53 $73 $96 $121 Alaska NA NA NA NA NA NA NA American Samoa NA NA NA NA NA NA NA Arizona 814,194 NA 2.54 119 163 214 270 Arkansas 162,996 NA 0.51 24 33 43 54 California 3,774,501 NA 11.78 553 757 991 1,253 Colorado 498,583 NA 1.56 73 100 131 165 Connecticut 272,385 NA 0.85 40 55 71 90 Delaware * 81,498 0.28 13 18 24 30 District of Columbia 215,421 NA 0.67 32 43 57 72 Florida 1,785,001 NA 5.57 262 358 469 593 Georgia 977,358 NA 3.05 143 196
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A5.txt
  • 23.58 INFINITE 250299 C HAYNEVILLE TEL. CO., INC. 9.28 -1.51 10.96 20.76 250300 C HOPPER TELECOMMUNICATIONS CO., INC. 9.80 -2.64 12.77 14.16 250301 A FRONTIER COMMUNICATIONS OF LAMAR COUNTY, LLC 5.22 -5.01 10.78 50.00 250302 C ALLTEL ALABAMA 1.68 0.34 1.33 -9.81 250304 C MILLRY TEL. CO., INC. -3.96 -2.94 -1.05 -19.80 250305 C MON-CRE TEL. COOP. INC. -3.68 -4.16 0.51 -6.08 250306 C FRONTIER COMMUNICATIONS OF ALABAMA, LLC -3.68 -1.85 -1.86 -23.11 250307 C MOUNDVILLE TEL. CO. -1.07 -7.90 7.41 2.24 250308 C NEW HOPE TEL. COOP., INC.-AL -6.20 -2.37 -3.93 -15.55 250311 A OAKMAN TEL. CO., INC. 1.69 -4.36 6.33 8.83 250312 A OTELCO TELEPHONE LLC 1.98 -2.03 4.09 0.00 250314 C PEOPLES TEL. CO. 7.46 -1.62 9.22 17.66
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-270407A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-270407A1.txt
  • 5 Table 1.4 Interstate Per-Minute Access Charges by Carrier (In Cents per Minute) 1 Rates Effective from 7/1/06-06/30/07 Year 2005 Minutes of Use Carrier (Millions) Common Line per Company Originating Access Local Minute 2 OriginatingTerminatingSwitching ALLTEL (KY & NE) 0.00� 0.00� 0.55� 0.31� 1.75� 596 938 2,083 BellSouth 0.00 0.00 0.43 0.33 1.54 20,492 66,617 57,115 CenturyTel 5 0.16 0.00 0.51 0.31 1.86 409 1,488 1,897 Cincinnati Bell 0.00 0.00 0.58 0.37 1.94 651 2,097 2,750 Citizens 0.15 0.00 0.50 0.45 2.10 1,304 4,744 6,049 Hawaiian Telecom 0.00 0.00 0.82 0.15 1.99 365 1,071 1,525 Iowa Telecom 0.00 0.00 1.55 0.66 4.53 297 349 647 Qwest 0.00 0.00 0.68 0.16 1.72 14,059 26,119 40,322 SBC 0.00 0.00 0.45 0.21 1.34 50,453
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-275668A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-275668A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-275668A1.txt
  • at 10-m distance Carpeted concrete slab -- Aspect Angle Front, rear, right side, right-rear (~45 deg.) Front and rear Rear # of TVs Tested One Three Three Separation Distance 2 m 2 m and 10 m 2 m and 10 m -- Wall thickness 5.25 inches (0.13 m) 12 inches (0.30 m) -- From transmit antenna to wall 20 inches (0.51 m) for 2-m distance 162 inches (4.11 m) for 10-m distance 33 inches (0.85 m) for 2-m distance 191 inches (4.85 m) for 10-m distance -- From TV to wall 53 inches (1.36 m) for 2-m distance 226 inches (5.75 m) for 10-m distance 33 inches (0.85 m) for 2-m distance 191 inches (4.85 m) for 10-m distance Cable Connection
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A1.txt
  • Hawaii 149 65 84 0.41 24 85 Idaho 183 61 123 0.59 35 124 Illinois 1,097 415 682 3.30 197 692 Indiana 572 257 315 1.52 91 319 Iowa 305 104 201 0.97 58 204 Kansas 279 83 197 0.95 57 200 Kentucky 400 160 240 1.16 69 244 Louisiana 422 169 253 1.22 73 256 Maine 159 54 105 0.51 30 107 Maryland 699 243 456 2.21 132 463 Massachusetts 798 275 524 2.53 151 531 Michigan 784 335 449 2.17 130 456 Minnesota 544 176 368 1.78 106 373 Mississippi 263 102 161 0.78 46 163 Missouri 641 225 416 2.01 120 422 Montana 117 49 68 0.33 20 69 Nebraska 202 52 150 0.73 43 152 Nevada 243
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A11.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A11.txt
  • Unscheduled Events Over 2 Minutes 1.6 11.5 2.5 3.7 58.3 81.9 91.4 4.8 462.1 For Unscheduled Downtime More Than 2 Minutes Number of Occurrences or Events 7 8 6 3 2 19 6 9 71 Events per Hundred Switches 0.5 0.5 0.8 0.2 1.2 1.5 0.5 0.7 2.9 Events per Million Access Lines 0.47 0.43 0.41 0.25 1.12 1.57 0.46 0.51 5.38 Average Outage Duration in Minutes 5.4 38.7 5.3 33.7 81.1 94.2 329.6 11.9 261.3 Average Lines Affected per Event in Thousands 16.4 14.5 39.0 5.3 6.9 1.7 9.4 10.8 1.7 Outage Line-Minutes per Event in Thousands 73.4 87.7 215.0 40.9 550.8 81.8 779.8 165.6 309.9 Outage Line-Minutes per 1,000 Access Lines 34.7 38.1 87.3 10.1 616.6 128.6 361.1 83.9
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A3.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A3.txt
  • Hawaii 149 65 84 0.41 24 85 Idaho 183 61 123 0.59 35 124 Illinois 1,097 415 682 3.30 197 692 Indiana 572 257 315 1.52 91 319 Iowa 305 104 201 0.97 58 204 Kansas 279 83 197 0.95 57 200 Kentucky 400 160 240 1.16 69 244 Louisiana 422 169 253 1.22 73 256 Maine 159 54 105 0.51 30 107 Maryland 699 243 456 2.21 132 463 Massachusetts 798 275 524 2.53 151 531 Michigan 784 335 449 2.17 130 456 Minnesota 544 176 368 1.78 106 373 Mississippi 263 102 161 0.78 46 163 Missouri 641 225 416 2.01 120 422 Montana 117 49 68 0.33 20 69 Nebraska 202 52 150 0.73 43 152 Nevada 243
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A5.txt
  • 0.01 0.41 Colorado 1.06 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.65 0.64 0.14 2.50 Connecticut 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.03 0.02 0.03 0.08 Delaware 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.04 0.00 0.04 Dist. of Columbia 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Florida 0.08 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.06 0.39 0.03 0.56 Georgia 0.58 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.51 0.39 0.20 1.69 Guam 5.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 6.14 0.00 0.00 11.15 Hawaii 2.65 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.86 0.31 0.27 5.10 Idaho 2.30 0.07 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.06 1.82 0.76 6.02 Illinois 0.19 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.32 0.13 0.12 0.77 Indiana 0.30 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.36 0.59 0.25 1.51 Iowa 0.95 0.12 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.43
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A9.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A9.txt
  • that are not in the NECA pool, but are subject to rate-of-return regulation. 7 - 28 2005 Minutes of Use Carrier (Millions) Common Line per Company Originating Access CCL CCL Local Minute** Originating Terminating Switching ALLTEL (KY & NE) 0.00� 0.00� 0.55� 0.31� 1.75� 596 938 2,083 BellSouth 0.00 0.00 0.43 0.33 1.54 20,492 66,617 57,115 CenturyTel # 0.16 0.00 0.51 0.31 1.86 409 1,488 1,897 Cincinnati Bell 0.00 0.00 0.58 0.37 1.94 651 2,097 2,750 Citizens 0.15 0.00 0.50 0.45 2.10 1,304 4,744 6,049 Hawaiian Telecom 0.00 0.00 0.82 0.15 1.99 365 1,071 1,525 Iowa Telecom 0.00 0.00 1.55 0.66 4.53 297 349 647 Qwest 0.00 0.00 0.68 0.16 1.72 14,059 26,119 40,322 AT&T 0.00 0.00 0.45 0.21 1.34 50,453
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-284932A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-284932A1.txt
  • of Use Carrier (Millions) Common Line per Company Originating Access Local Minute 2 OriginatingTerminatingSwitching ALLTEL (KY & NE) 0.00� 0.00� 0.55� 0.32� 1.79� 561 854 1,916 AT&T ILEC 5 0.00 0.00 0.46 0.27 1.48 46,215 108,977 158,451 CenturyTel 6 0.14 0.00 0.55 0.30 1.88 404 1,381 1,785 Cincinnati Bell 0.00 0.00 0.61 0.40 2.07 655 1,998 2,580 Citizens 0.20 0.00 0.51 0.51 2.28 1,107 3,957 5,063 Embarq 7 0.00 0.00 0.79 0.17 1.97 4,708 18,683 20,669 Hawaiian Telecom 0.00 0.00 0.63 0.20 1.71 355 1,013 1,839 Iowa Telecom 0.00 0.00 1.59 0.67 4.63 221 331 551 Qwest 0.00 0.00 0.74 0.16 1.84 13,007 24,166 37,296 Verizon 0.03 0.00 0.50 0.22 1.52 30,245 83,119 113,797 Windstream 8 0.00 0.00 0.77 0.48 2.56
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287688A1.pdf
  • ISLAND -2.97 -11.64 9.81 0.00 SOUTH CAROLINA -0.12 -5.26 5.43 15.81 SOUTH DAKOTA -3.56 -7.78 4.57 5.78 TENNESSEE -1.13 -5.36 4.47 14.58 TEXAS 1.52 -5.82 7.79 0.97 UTAH -10.16 -4.38 -6.04 -10.28 VERMONT 0.98 -3.14 4.25 -10.24 VIRGIN ISLANDS -4.48 -1.20 -3.33 -16.38 VIRGINIA -2.11 -5.77 3.87 -10.25 WASHINGTON -10.92 -8.22 -2.94 9.16 WEST VIRGINIA -4.04 -5.18 1.20 -8.71 WISCONSIN -0.51 -6.87 6.83 -3.12 WYOMING -15.48 -7.32 -8.81 -7.97 GRAND TOTAL -2.33 -6.49 4.44 1.84 * Percentage changes from 2007 to 2008. Source: Calculated from National Exchange Carrier Association data. Unseparated High Cost Loop Unseparated Number NTS Revenue Support Payment NTS Revenue of Requirement Projections in Requirement Loops per Loop Later Year* 3 - 31 State or Jurisdiction 2002 2003 2004
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287688A11.pdf
  • For Unscheduled Events Over 2 Minutes 0.5 1.9 0.6 9.0 NA 105.9 421.2 14.4 561.1 For Unscheduled Downtime More Than 2 Minutes Number of Occurrences or Events 4 3 2 11 0 36 6 5 62 Events per Hundred Switches 0.3 0.2 0.3 0.7 0.0 2.8 0.5 0.4 2.6 Events per Million Access Lines 0.31 0.17 0.15 0.99 0.00 3.20 0.51 0.31 5.08 Average Outage Duration in Minutes 3.3 17.5 4.0 22.1 NA 64.2 1518.7 67.3 363.2 Average Lines Affected per Event in Thousands 16.1 19.6 57.8 11.6 NA 1.9 14.0 6.7 2.3 Outage Line-Minutes per Event in Thousands 53.1 447.5 196.5 93.7 NA 144.0 8,786.1 181.7 859.1 Outage Line-Minutes per 1,000 Access Lines 16.2 77.6 29.0 93.0 0.0 460.5 4,478.8
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287688A5.pdf
  • ISLAND -2.97 -11.64 9.81 0.00 SOUTH CAROLINA -0.12 -5.26 5.43 15.81 SOUTH DAKOTA -3.56 -7.78 4.57 5.78 TENNESSEE -1.13 -5.36 4.47 14.58 TEXAS 1.52 -5.82 7.79 0.97 UTAH -10.16 -4.38 -6.04 -10.28 VERMONT 0.98 -3.14 4.25 -10.24 VIRGIN ISLANDS -4.48 -1.20 -3.33 -16.38 VIRGINIA -2.11 -5.77 3.87 -10.25 WASHINGTON -10.92 -8.22 -2.94 9.16 WEST VIRGINIA -4.04 -5.18 1.20 -8.71 WISCONSIN -0.51 -6.87 6.83 -3.12 WYOMING -15.48 -7.32 -8.81 -7.97 GRAND TOTAL -2.33 -6.49 4.44 1.84 * Percentage changes from 2007 to 2008. Source: Calculated from National Exchange Carrier Association data. Unseparated High Cost Loop Unseparated Number NTS Revenue Support Payment NTS Revenue of Requirement Projections in Requirement Loops per Loop Later Year* 3 - 31 State or Jurisdiction 2002 2003 2004
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287688A9.pdf
  • of Use Carrier (Millions) Common Line per Company Originating Access Local Minute 2 OriginatingTerminatingSwitching ALLTEL (KY & NE) 0.00� 0.00� 0.55� 0.32� 1.79� 561 854 1,916 AT&T ILEC 5 0.00 0.00 0.46 0.27 1.48 46,215 108,977 158,451 CenturyTel 6 0.14 0.00 0.55 0.30 1.88 404 1,381 1,785 Cincinnati Bell 0.00 0.00 0.61 0.40 2.07 655 1,998 2,580 Citizens 0.20 0.00 0.51 0.51 2.28 1,107 3,957 5,063 Embarq 7 0.00 0.00 0.79 0.17 1.97 4,708 18,683 20,669 Hawaiian Telecom 0.00 0.00 0.63 0.20 1.71 355 1,013 1,839 Iowa Telecom 0.00 0.00 1.59 0.67 4.63 221 331 551 Qwest 0.00 0.00 0.74 0.16 1.84 13,007 24,166 37,296 Verizon 0.03 0.00 0.50 0.22 1.52 30,245 83,119 113,797 Windstream 8 0.00 0.00 0.77 0.48 2.56
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A1.txt
  • 2.77 2.53 230 303 North Dakota 345,047 0.21 0.34 0.24 22 29 N. Mariana Islands NA NA NA NA NA NA Ohio 5,811,185 3.48 4.88 3.83 349 459 Oklahoma 1,181,452 0.71 0.70 0.70 64 85 Oregon 1,317,944 0.79 1.27 0.91 83 109 Pennsylvania 6,604,937 3.95 5.18 4.26 388 511 Puerto Rico 0 0.00 0.24 0.06 5 7 Rhode Island 855,074 0.51 0.06 0.40 36 48 South Carolina 2,096,742 1.25 1.55 1.33 121 159 South Dakota 245,752 0.15 0.49 0.23 21 28 Tennessee 2,668,101 1.60 0.75 1.38 126 166 Texas 12,667,912 7.58 8.81 7.89 718 946 Utah 944,664 0.57 0.74 0.61 56 73 Vermont 632,509 0.38 0.10 0.31 28 37 Virginia 4,531,805 2.71 2.31 2.61 238 313 Virgin Islands NA NA NA
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A3.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A3.txt
  • 2.77 2.53 230 303 North Dakota 345,047 0.21 0.34 0.24 22 29 N. Mariana Islands NA NA NA NA NA NA Ohio 5,811,185 3.48 4.88 3.83 349 459 Oklahoma 1,181,452 0.71 0.70 0.70 64 85 Oregon 1,317,944 0.79 1.27 0.91 83 109 Pennsylvania 6,604,937 3.95 5.18 4.26 388 511 Puerto Rico 0 0.00 0.24 0.06 5 7 Rhode Island 855,074 0.51 0.06 0.40 36 48 South Carolina 2,096,742 1.25 1.55 1.33 121 159 South Dakota 245,752 0.15 0.49 0.23 21 28 Tennessee 2,668,101 1.60 0.75 1.38 126 166 Texas 12,667,912 7.58 8.81 7.89 718 946 Utah 944,664 0.57 0.74 0.61 56 73 Vermont 632,509 0.38 0.10 0.31 28 37 Virginia 4,531,805 2.71 2.31 2.61 238 313 Virgin Islands NA NA NA
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A5.txt
  • 2.67 -7.36 10.83 4.43 KENTUCKY -7.72 -7.93 0.22 -5.85 LOUISIANA -8.38 -5.36 -3.19 -8.19 MAINE -1.30 -7.54 6.74 -25.32 MARYLAND -1.31 -7.32 6.48 57.59 MASSACHUSETTS -3.47 -8.12 5.05 101.01 MICHIGAN -1.82 -11.30 10.69 4.47 MINNESOTA 0.84 -6.86 8.26 -7.68 MISSISSIPPI -4.91 -6.15 1.33 -10.29 MISSOURI 5.37 -5.69 11.74 18.32 MONTANA 2.09 -7.10 9.89 9.14 NEBRASKA -2.26 -5.56 3.50 -1.33 NEVADA -0.51 -8.99 9.32 -4.54 NEW HAMPSHIRE -3.19 -8.22 5.48 6.65 NEW JERSEY 2.45 -10.52 14.50 0.00 NEW MEXICO -6.15 -5.63 -0.55 9.65 NEW YORK -3.34 -9.58 6.90 -12.45 NORTH CAROLINA -3.25 -6.29 3.24 32.04 NORTH DAKOTA 0.99 -10.60 12.97 6.33 NORTHERN MARIANA ISLANDS -11.60 -10.55 -1.18 0.00 OHIO -3.16 -9.38 6.87 -10.81 OKLAHOMA 2.06 -6.77 9.47 -1.48 OREGON 1.37 -8.42 10.69
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A9.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A9.txt
  • Local Common Switching Line per Minutes of Company Originating Use Access (Millions) Minute ACS 0.00� 0.00� 0.56� 0.12� 1.39� 236 Am�rica M�vil 0.00 0.00 0.90 0.22 2.29 2,029 AT&T 0.00 0.00 0.49 0.24 1.50 135,647 CenturyTel 0.01 0.00 0.85 0.21 2.18 20,102 Cincinnati Bell 0.00 0.00 0.66 0.55 2.47 2,170 Consolidated 0.00 0.00 1.33 0.35 3.46 456 FairPoint 0.00 0.00 0.51 0.28 1.62 3,421 Frontier 0.19 0.00 0.50 0.58 2.40 4,567 Hawaiian Telecom 0.00 0.00 0.63 0.38 2.06 996 Iowa Telecom 0.00 0.00 1.48 0.78 4.62 445 Pacific Telecom Inc. 0.00 0.00 0.49 0.17 1.35 48 Qwest 0.00 0.00 0.79 0.20 2.03 30,733 Verizon 0.00 0.00 0.55 0.26 1.64 86,668 Windstream 0.00 0.00 0.62 0.25 1.78 6,084 Price Caps 0.00 0.00
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-296239A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-296239A1.txt
  • the sum of households across This chart shows cumulative and non-cumulative subscribership ratios by income deciles. Counties were grouped into income deciles based on county median household income in 1999, as reported by the Lower Income Counties Ranked by Median Household Income, in Deciles Higher Income Cumulative Not Cumulative 0.28 0.28 0.36 0.44 0.38 0.40 0.40 0.44 0.42 0.48 0.44 0.51 0.48 0.57 0.51 0.58 0.55 0.63 0.60 0.72 Subs crib ershi p R atio 0.00 0.10 0.20 0.30 0.40 0.50 0.60 0.70 0.80 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 U.S. Federal Communications Commission High-Speed Services for Internet Access: Status as of December 31, 2008 51 39 Max Q1 Q3 Median Min Chart 20 Subscribership Ratio Distributions
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-301294A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-301294A1.txt
  • 0.41 Missouri 1,269 2,323 0.55 Montana 212 385 0.55 Nebraska 425 698 0.61 Nevada 608 1,015 0.60 New Hampshire 378 514 0.73 New Jersey 2,456 3,202 0.77 New Mexico 389 748 0.52 New York 5,080 7,297 0.70 North Carolina 2,172 3,617 0.60 North Dakota 155 255 0.61 Northern Mariana Isl * 14 * Ohio 2,754 4,495 0.61 Oklahoma 731 1,423 0.51 Oregon 917 1,489 0.62 Pennsylvania 3,194 4,831 0.66 Puerto Rico 315 1,262 0.25 Rhode Island 282 418 0.67 South Carolina 944 1,721 0.55 South Dakota 179 310 0.58 Tennessee 1,248 2,455 0.51 Texas 4,728 8,730 0.54 Utah 528 858 0.62 Vermont 153 247 0.62 Virgin Islands 10 41 0.26 Virginia 1,904 3,003 0.63 Washington 1,670 2,533 0.66 West Virginia 359
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-301823A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-301823A1.txt
  • Local Common Switching Line per Minutes of Company Originating Use Access (Millions) Minute ACS 0.00� 0.00� 0.56� 0.12� 1.39� 236 Am�rica M�vil 0.00 0.00 0.90 0.22 2.29 2,029 AT&T 0.00 0.00 0.49 0.24 1.50 135,647 CenturyTel 0.01 0.00 0.85 0.21 2.18 20,102 Cincinnati Bell 0.00 0.00 0.66 0.55 2.47 2,170 Consolidated 0.00 0.00 1.33 0.35 3.46 456 FairPoint 0.00 0.00 0.51 0.28 1.62 3,421 Frontier 0.19 0.00 0.50 0.58 2.40 4,567 Hawaiian Telecom 0.00 0.00 0.63 0.38 2.06 996 Iowa Telecom 0.00 0.00 1.48 0.78 4.62 445 Pacific Telecom Inc. 0.00 0.00 0.49 0.17 1.35 48 Qwest 0.00 0.00 0.79 0.20 2.03 30,733 Verizon 0.00 0.00 0.55 0.26 1.64 86,668 Windstream 0.00 0.00 0.62 0.25 1.78 6,084 Price Caps 0.00 0.00
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303405A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303405A1.txt
  • American Samoa, Guam, Northern Mariana Islands and U.S. Virgin Islands). U.S. Federal Communications Commission Internet Access Services: Status as of December 31, 2009 34 20 Table 16 Residential Fixed Connections and Households by State as of December 31, 2009 (Connections over 200 kbps in at least one direction and households, in thousands) State Connections Households Subscribership Ratio Alabama 944 1,867 0.51 Alaska 168 252 0.67 American Samoa * 9 * Arizona 1,566 2,464 0.64 Arkansas 540 1,144 0.47 California 8,736 12,634 0.69 Colorado 1,346 1,978 0.68 Connecticut 1,019 1,358 0.75 Delaware 246 343 0.72 District of Columbia 175 270 0.65 Florida 4,980 7,344 0.68 Georgia 2,169 3,697 0.59 Guam * 39 * Hawaii * 436 * Idaho 311 575 0.54 Illinois
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303886A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303886A1.txt
  • 2009 3 Percent of Total Interstate Access Minutes: 2009Percent of Total Alabama 1,861 1.49% 460 1.05% 6 1.48% 3,887 1.52% 5,561,528 1.76% Alaska 294 0.24 109 0.25 2 0.43 480 0.19 1,025,583 0.32 American Samoa 11 0.01 0 0.00 0 0.02 20 0.01 19,087 0.01 Arizona 1,943 1.56 1,218 2.78 13 3.26 4,936 1.93 6,058,782 1.92 Arkansas 1,069 0.86 223 0.51 2 0.58 2,446 0.96 3,098,534 0.98 California 17,149 13.76 4,536 10.37 66 16.36 31,946 12.49 31,440,776 9.96 Colorado 1,973 1.58 838 1.91 8 2.02 4,066 1.59 6,116,346 1.94 Connecticut 1,632 1.31 625 1.43 3 0.68 2,959 1.16 4,795,494 1.52 Delaware 396 0.32 164 0.37 1 0.25 775 0.30 1,391,815 0.44 District of Columbia 788 0.63 182 0.42 0 0.12 1,047
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303886A3.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303886A3.txt
  • 2009 3 Percent of Total Interstate Access Minutes: 2009Percent of Total Alabama 1,861 1.49% 460 1.05% 6 1.48% 3,887 1.52% 5,561,528 1.76% Alaska 294 0.24 109 0.25 2 0.43 480 0.19 1,025,583 0.32 American Samoa 11 0.01 0 0.00 0 0.02 20 0.01 19,087 0.01 Arizona 1,943 1.56 1,218 2.78 13 3.26 4,936 1.93 6,058,782 1.92 Arkansas 1,069 0.86 223 0.51 2 0.58 2,446 0.96 3,098,534 0.98 California 17,149 13.76 4,536 10.37 66 16.36 31,946 12.49 31,440,776 9.96 Colorado 1,973 1.58 838 1.91 8 2.02 4,066 1.59 6,116,346 1.94 Connecticut 1,632 1.31 625 1.43 3 0.68 2,959 1.16 4,795,494 1.52 Delaware 396 0.32 164 0.37 1 0.25 775 0.30 1,391,815 0.44 District of Columbia 788 0.63 182 0.42 0 0.12 1,047
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303886A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303886A5.txt
  • 0.13 1.52 TEXAS 0.73 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.49 0.25 0.11 1.59 UTAH 0.41 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.63 0.16 0.27 1.48 VERMONT 0.67 0.09 0.00 1.54 0.00 1.50 0.42 0.66 4.87 VIRGIN ISLANDS 5.98 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 13.26 0.00 0.00 19.24 VIRGINIA 0.05 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.15 0.91 0.06 1.18 WASHINGTON 0.50 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.65 0.51 0.13 1.79 WEST VIRGINIA 0.20 0.01 0.00 1.61 0.00 0.17 1.47 0.19 3.64 WISCONSIN 0.71 0.06 (0.00) 0.00 0.00 1.62 0.00 0.41 2.80 WYOMING 3.49 0.04 0.00 2.80 0.00 3.22 1.45 1.05 12.06 INDUSTRY $0.69 $0.03 $0.00 $0.16 $0.00 $0.76 $0.30 $0.18 $2.12 Based on 2009 support payments and reported loops or lines from USAC filing for the Fourth Quarter
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303886A9.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303886A9.txt
  • Local Common Switching Line per Minutes of Company Originating Use Access (Millions) Minute ACS 0.00� 0.00� 0.59� 0.37� 1.97� 481 AT&T 0.00 0.00 0.52 0.26 1.59 116,741 Am�rica M�vil 0.00 0.00 0.73 0.20 1.92 1,778 CenturyLink 0.00 0.00 0.84 0.21 2.15 18,727 Cincinnati Bell 0.00 0.00 0.68 0.62 2.64 1,959 Consolidated 0.00 0.00 1.18 0.29 3.02 432 FairPoint 0.00 0.00 0.51 0.24 1.53 3,203 Frontier 0.06 0.00 0.56 0.37 1.97 14,823 Hawaiin Telecom 0.00 0.00 0.67 0.33 2.04 835 Innovative 0.00 0.00 0.77 0.18 1.95 244 Pacific Telecom 0.00 0.00 0.46 0.15 1.26 47 Qwest 0.00 0.00 0.76 0.19 1.95 26,566 Verizon 0.00 0.00 0.55 0.27 1.68 66,373 Windstream 0.00 0.00 0.56 0.32 1.81 6,828 Price Caps 0.00 0.00 0.58 0.26
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-305296A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-305296A1.txt
  • of June 30, 2010 Sources: FCC Form 477, Part VI; Geolytics 2010 Block-Level Estimates; and Census 2000. Note: Ratios over 1 were set to 1. See Technical Notes at the end of the report. 0 0.050.100.150.20 0.250.300.350.400.450.50 0.550.600.650.700.750.80 0.850.900.95 Max 0% 2% 4% 6% 8% 10% 12% 14% Per cen tage of Co unt ies Number of Counties 3,232 Median 0.51 Ratio of Residential Fixed Connections to County Households 19 28 32 58 104 132 215 242 328 384 366 378 341 202 171 87 60 31 14 40 U.S. Federal Communications Commission Internet Access Services: Status as of June 30, 2010 51 36 Table 25 Distribution of Counties by Ratio of Residential Fixed Connections over 200 kbps in at Least
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-310261A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-310261A1.txt
  • speeds at least 3 mbps down and 768 up and households, in thousands) State Connections Households Subscribership Ratio Alabama 389 1,867 0.21 Alaska * 252 * American Samoa 0 9 0.00 Arizona 988 2,464 0.40 Arkansas 202 1,144 0.18 California 5,137 12,634 0.41 Colorado 988 1,978 0.50 Connecticut 658 1,358 0.48 Delaware 210 343 0.61 District of Columbia 137 270 0.51 Florida 2,883 7,344 0.39 Georgia 1,104 3,697 0.30 Guam * 39 * Hawaii * 436 * Idaho 85 575 0.15 Illinois 1,588 4,803 0.33 Indiana 760 2,493 0.30 Iowa 194 1,197 0.16 Kansas 251 1,101 0.23 Kentucky 511 1,718 0.30 Louisiana 466 1,694 0.28 Maine 104 539 0.19 Maryland 1,304 2,158 0.60 Massachusetts 1,640 2,568 0.64 Michigan 1,369 3,808 0.36
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-208A2.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-208A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-208A2.txt
  • OR-8-01 % Acknowledgements on Time 99.49 98.21 99.05 98.22 OR-9-01 % Acknowledgement Completeness 96.67 99.90 99.23 99.64 OR-3-01 % Rejects 21.73 23.25 21.87 21.09 OR-4-02 Completion Notice - % On Time 99.58 97.18 99.43 99.59 OR-4-05 Work Completion Notice - % On Time 100.00 99.99 99.95 99.92 OR-4-07 % SOP to Bill Completion >= 5 Business Days UD 0.90 UD 0.51 UD 0.59 3.98 OR-4-08 % SOP to Bill Completion > 1 Business Day 9.47 UD 12.38 UD 9.32 12.65 OR-5-01 % Flow Through - Total (ASRs + LSRs) 83.36 83.73 82.58 80.55 OR-5-03 % Flow Through Achieved 91.72 91.65 91.12 92.67 UNE Platform OR-1-02 % On Time LSRC - Flow Through 98.03 96.16 98.42 97.91 OR-1-04 % On Time LSRC/ASRC
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-269A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-269A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-269A1.txt
  • identifying and resolving stand-alone bills would require significant effort.'' Id. After Verizon implemented a series of software modifications, however, KPMG performed additional tests and concluded on September 14, 2000 that this exception could be closed. Id. Verizon McLean/Wierzbicki/Webster Reply Decl. at paras. 38-40; Verizon Aug. 17 Ex Parte Letter at 4 (reporting the percent of disputed directory advertising charges as 0.51 percent for February, 1.09 percent for March, 0.09 percent for April, 0.17 percent for May and 0.08 percent for June). As Z-Tel acknowledges in its comments, some nominal level of dispute over wholesale billing is to be expected in any large-volume, carrier-to-carrier relationship. See Z-Tel Comments at 11 (Z-Tel disputes two-to-three percent of its bill in states such as Massachusetts,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-29A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-29A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-29A1.txt
  • Aggregate Performance Data, Measurement Nos. 27 and 29, Kansas and Oklahoma, at 271-No. 27b and 271-No. 27b. See SWBT Aggregated Performance Data, Measurement No. 35c, at 271-No. 35c. For timeliness, see SWBT Aggregate Performance Data, Measurement No. 27-05, Kansas and Oklahoma, at 271-No. 27b (disparity of 1.05 days in July and 0.12 day in August in Kansas and disparity of 0.51 day in Oklahoma in August); Measurement No. 29-06, Oklahoma, at 271-No. 29b (disparity of 4.54 percent in July, 0.6 percent in September and 0.63 percent in October.) For quality, see Measurement No. 35-12, Oklahoma, at 271-No. 35c (disparity of 0.73 percent in July and August; 1.1 percent in September, and 0.2 percent in October). See SWBT Aggregate Performance Data, Measure
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-107A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-107A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-107A1.txt
  • --- No. of satellite channels 44.88 46.42 44.79 -1.63 -3.5% Standard error 0.89 1.26 0.86 -- --- Rate per satellite channel $0.801 $0.744 $0.805 $0.061 8.2% Standard error 0.02 0.04 0.02 -- --- July 1, 2000 BST $12.57 $11.95 $12.62 $0.67 5.6% Standard error 0.50 0.55 0.49 -- --- Major CPST $18.88 $17.64 $18.95 $1.31 7.4% Standard error 0.54 0.80 0.51 -- --- Programming total $31.45 $29.59 $31.57 $1.98 6.7%* Standard error 0.33 0.57 0.31 -- --- Equipment $2.97 $2.90 $2.97 $0.07 2.4% Standard error 0.11 0.16 0.11 -- --- Programming and equipment $34.42 $32.49 $34.54 $2.05 6.3%* Standard error 0.35 0.61 0.33 -- --- Number of channels 56.27 57.47 56.20 -1.27 -2.2% Standard error 1.03 1.46 0.97 -- --- Rate
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-10A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-10A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-10A1.txt
  • consumer complaints and other general inquiries by consumers. 6. Section 0.31 is amended by revising paragraph (n) to read as follows: OFFICE OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY � 0.31 Functions of the Office. * * * * * (n) To assist the Consumer and Governmental Affairs Bureau on issues involving informal consumer complaints and other general inquiries by consumers. 7. Section 0.51 is amended by removing paragraph (q), redesignating paragraph (r) and redesignating and revising paragraph (s) to read as follows: INTERNATIONAL BUREAU � 0.51 Functions of the Bureau. * * * * * (q) To exercise authority to issue non-hearing related subpoenas for the attendance and testimony of witnesses and the production of books, papers, correspondence, memoranda, schedules of charges, contracts,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-110A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-110A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-110A1.txt
  • Operate a Ka-band Satellite System in the Fixed-Satellite Service, File No. 182 through 186-SAT-P/LA-95 & SAT-MOD-19971222-00200, filed September 1995. Initially, the Commission assigned responsibility for regulating DBS to its Mass Media Bureau, along with other broadcast services. In 1994, when the Commission created the International Bureau, it granted the Bureau authority over all satellite services, including DBS. 47 C.F.R. � 0.51. See Amendment of Parts 0, 1, 25, 43, 64 and 73 of the Commission's Rules to Reflect a Reorganization Establishing the International Bureau, Order, 9 FCC Rcd 7050 (1994). Notice at � 5. 1982 DBS Order at � 84. The Commission has concluded that subscription video service is neither broadcast nor common carrier. In re Subscription Video Services, Report and
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-330A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-330A1.txt
  • 0.33 3 - 300300Elct:LEX-CLEO/LASR Resale Syntax 0.06 0.33 0.05 0.33 0.05 0.33 0.23 0.33 0.07 0.33 3 - 300400Elct:EDI-CLEO/LASR Facilities Syntax 0.20 0.33 0.19 0.33 0.18 0.33 0.24 0.33 0.36 0.33 3 - 300500Elct:EDI-CLEO/LASR Resale Syntax 0.25 0.33 0.17 0.33 0.21 0.33 0.26 0.33 0.21 0.33 3 - 300501Elct:EDI-CLEO/LASR Directory Listings Syntax 0.26 0.33 0.28 0.33 0.26 0.33 0.32 0.33 0.51 0.33 3 - 300700Elct Man:LEX-CLEO/LASR (Exc to LSC) Facilities Content Errs 2.29 5.00 1.88 5.00 2.40 5.00 2.24 5.00 2.94 5.00 3 - 300800Elct Man:LEX-CLEO/LASR (Exc to LSC) Resale Content Errs 5.67 5.00 2.43 5.00 3.27 5.00 1.63 5.00 1.67 5.00 3 - 300900Elct Man:EDI-CLEO/LASR (Exc to LSC) Facilities Content Errs 2.99 5.00 2.41 5.00 3.03 5.00 2.48 5.00 2.52
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-331A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-331A1.txt
  • 1,2,4,5 A.2.12.6.1.1ISDN/<10 circuits/Dispatch/FL (%) 7.28% 0.00% 6.50% 33.33% 6.57% 0.00% 6.99% 33.33% 1.59% 0.00%1,2,3,4,5 A.2.12.6.1.2ISDN/<10 circuits/Non-Dispatch/FL (%) 0.62% 0.00% 0.74% 5.56% 0.91% 0.00% 0.66% 0.00% 0.86% 0.00% 3,5 A.2.12.6.2.1ISDN/>=10 circuits/Dispatch/FL (%) 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.63% 0.00% 5 A.2.12.6.2.2ISDN/>=10 circuits/Non-Dispatch/FL (%) 0.00% 0.00% 1.69% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 1,4,5 Average Completion Notice Interval - Mechanized A.2.14.1.1.1Residence/<10 circuits/Dispatch/FL (hours) 4.11 0.51 3.97 1.26 6.97 0.48 6.23 0.29 5.25 0.04 A.2.14.1.1.2Residence/<10 circuits/Non- Dispatch/FL (hours) 0.94 0.79 1.10 0.86 1.27 0.78 1.02 0.72 0.92 0.73 A.2.14.1.2.1Residence/>=10 circuits/Dispatch/FL (hours) 3.51 0.27 2.57 2.03 4.42 1.75 4.10 0.14 1.74 0.02 1,2,3,4,5 A.2.14.2.1.1Business/<10 circuits/Dispatch/FL (hours) 3.00 1.07 5.32 0.76 5.18 0.43 3.97 0.40 3.92 0.03 A.2.14.2.1.2Business/<10 circuits/Non- Dispatch/FL (hours) 3.35 0.78 2.54 0.91 1.67 0.83 1.37
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-12A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-12A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-12A1.txt
  • 0.7% -20.2% Monthly cable rate --- 3.7% 7.5% 15.7% -1.0% Number of channels --- -0.6% 12.8% -5.6% -1.4% Price per channel --- 2.6% -5.7% 27.2% 4.6% Standard Error of Averages January 1, 2004 Programming 0.21 0.86 0.89 0.59 0.66 Equipment 0.10 0.23 0.42 0.19 0.22 Monthly cable rate 0.26 0.96 1.11 0.64 0.77 Number of channels 0.55 2.00 2.44 0.92 0.51 Price per channel 0.01 0.02 0.02 0.01 0.01 * These averages include cable system prices in communities with an Effective Competition finding based on DBS or wireless competition, but not the prices charged by the competing DBS or wireless system. Source: Survey. Attachment 7 Monthly Cable Rates and Price Per Channel by Sample Group and Subgroup January 1, 2004 Sample
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-13A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-13A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-13A1.txt
  • 0 0.0% 0.25 8.4% 0 0.0% Ireland 1.3 0.46 35.1% 0.1 7.6% 0.36 27.4% 0 0.0% Italy 20.9 2.85 13.6% 0 0.0% 2.85 13.6% 0 0.0% Japan 48.5 12.17 25.1% 4.0 8.24% 6.2 12.8% No data No data Luxembourg 0.2 0.01 5.3% 0 1.0% 0.01 4.2% 0 0.0% Netherlands 7.1 0.69 9.7% 0.11 1.6% 0.55 7.8% 0.03 0.4% Portugal 3.1 0.51 16.2% 0.02 0.6% 0.49 15.6% 0 0.0% Spain 12.6 2.38 18.9% 0.15 1.2% 2.06 16.4% 0.17 1.3% Sweden 4.5 1.25 28.0% 0.17 3.8% 0.88 19.7% 0.2 4.5% U.K. 24.4 13.14 53.8% 2.29 9.4% 8.04 32.9% 2.81 11.5% U.S. 106.6 41.75 40.0% 21.5 20.2% 20.25 19.0% 0.85 0.8% Terrestrial, Cable, and Satellite Competition In contrast to the United States, the majority
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-154A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-154A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-154A1.txt
  • 154(i), 154(j), 155, 201-205, 214, 303(r), 309 and Sections 1.3 and 1.115 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.3, 1.115, that the Petition for Reconsideration of the Commission's Order on Review and the International Bureau's March 10, 2003 Order filed by PLDT is DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to the ISP Reform First Report and Order and sections 0.51 and 0.261 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.51 and 0.261 that the U.S.-Philippines route is removed from the ISP. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Marlene H. Dortch Secretary See AT&T Corp. Emergency Petition for Settlements Stop Payment Order and Request for Immediate Interim Relief and Petition of WorldCom, Inc. for Prevention of ``Whipsawing'' on the U.S.-Philippines Route, IB Docket No.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-179A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-179A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-179A1.txt
  • tier plus equipment $12.99 $13.10 $11.85 $13.11 $12.68 $14.32 $11.10 $11.41 $6.65 Standard error 0.26 0.23 0.53 0.60 0.53 0.81 0.39 0.54 1.32 January 1, 2004 Basic $13.84 $13.79 $14.41 $13.01 $11.92 $16.05 $15.92 $14.29 $16.07 Standard error 0.40 0.38 0.70 0.74 0.57 1.22 0.59 0.70 1.48 Expanded basic $27.07 $27.39 $23.88 $21.12 $22.08 $18.43 $25.32 $26.90 $22.72 Standard error 0.51 0.47 0.88 0.95 0.81 1.33 0.81 0.74 1.67 Basic + expanded basic tiers $40.91 $41.18 $38.29 $34.13 $34.00 $34.48 $41.24 $41.19 $38.79 Standard error 0.32 0.29 0.61 0.84 0.85 0.80 0.42 0.43 1.05 Digital tier plus equipment $12.83 $12.90 $12.07 $13.30 $13.32 $13.26 $11.50 $11.47 $6.08 Standard error 0.25 0.22 0.56 0.58 0.53 0.73 0.40 0.67 1.34 Sources: Survey. ATTACHMENT
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-35A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-35A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-35A1.txt
  • * * Section 0.11 is amended by removing paragraph (a)(11). Section 0.31 is amended by revising paragraph (d) to read as follows: (d) To advise the Commission concerning engineering matters, including (in consultation with the Public Safety and Homeland Security Bureau where appropriate) privacy and security of communications, involved in making or implementing policy or in resolving specific cases. Section 0.51 is amended by adding paragraph 0.51(s) to read as follows: To coordinate with the Public Safety and Homeland Security Bureau on all matters affecting public safety, homeland security, national security, emergency management, disaster management, and related issues. Section 0.61 is amended by adding the paragraph 0.61(l) to read as follows: To coordinate with the Public Safety and Homeland Security Bureau
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-169A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-169A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-169A1.txt
  • the Adelphia Order. The second regression differs from the Adelphia Order by adding TEAM COUNT, LN STANDARD DEVIATION ELEVATION and LN STANDARD DEVIATION ELEVATION*LATITUDE. Thus, it addresses all of the omitted variable claims. Table 2 DBS Penetration and RSN Access Independent Variables Dependent Variable: LN DBS PENETRATION Coefficient z-statistic LN CABLE PRICE 1.06 1.22 LN CABLE CHANNELS -0.72* -1.96 PHILLY -0.51* -6.59 SANDIEGO -0.87* -9.37 CHARLOTTE -0.22 -1.64 KEYDMA 0.23* 4.13 TEAM COUNT -0.04* -3.03 DBSOVERAIR -0.09 -1.59 CABLECOMP 0.04 0.18 HDTV -0.11 -1.57 INTERNET -0.02 -0.21 LN INCOME -0.21 -1.89 LN MULTIDWELL -0.39* -11.53 LN LATITUDE 0.38 0.91 LN STANDARD DEVIATION ELEVATION 1.01* 2.59 LN STANDARD DEVIATION ELEVATION*LATITUDE -0.25* -2.31 CONSTANT -1.08 -0.34 Observations 674 Centered R-Squared 0.42 F-Statistic (16,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-257A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-257A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-257A1.txt
  • 0003382444, filed by Cellco Partnership d/b/a Verizon Wireless on April 2, 2008, and amended on April 14, 2008, shall be conditioned upon the implementation of the divestiture in CMA551 New Jersey 2-Ocean as described above. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to Sections 4(i) and 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 154(i), 310(b)(4), and sections 0.51 and 0.261 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.51, 0.261, that the International Bureau SHALL PROCESS the petition for declaratory ruling filed by Cellco Partnership d/b/a Verizon Wireless, File No. ISP-PDR-20071129-00016, in accordance with the Commission's foreign ownership rules and policies under Section 310 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. � 310. IT IS FURTHER
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-129A7.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-129A7.txt
  • the sum of households across This chart shows cumulative and non-cumulative subscribership ratios by income deciles. Counties were grouped into income deciles based on county median household income in 1999, as reported by the Lower Income Counties Ranked by Median Household Income, in Deciles Higher Income Cumulative Not Cumulative 0.28 0.28 0.36 0.44 0.38 0.40 0.40 0.44 0.42 0.48 0.44 0.51 0.48 0.57 0.51 0.58 0.55 0.63 0.60 0.72 Subs crib ershi p R atio 0.00 0.10 0.20 0.30 0.40 0.50 0.60 0.70 0.80 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 U.S. Federal Communications Commission High-Speed Services for Internet Access: Status as of December 31, 2008 51 39 Max Q1 Q3 Median Min Chart 20 Subscribership Ratio Distributions
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-84A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-84A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-84A1.txt
  • FL AT&T IL AT&T TX Qwest CO Qwest WA Cable Rate 4.58 2.16 5.43 4.92 1.80 2.16 1.58 2.48 Telecom Rate - Urbanized (5 attachers) 6.92 3.26 8.21 7.44 2.72 3.26 2.39 3.75 Telecom Rate - Non-Urbanized (3 attachers) 10.43 4.92 12.39 11.22 4.11 4.92 3.60 5.65 No Capital Costs Telecom Rate - Urbanized (5 attachers) 1.71 0.49 2.47 2.03 0.51 0.94 0.82 0.66 Telecom Rate - Non-Urbanized (3 attachers) 2.58 0.74 3.72 3.06 0.77 1.41 1.24 0.99 Utility Pole Attachment Rates, Based on FERC Data ($ per attachment per year) APPENDIX B Proposed Rules Part 1, Subpart J of Title 47 of the Code of Federal Regulations would be amended as follows: The heading of Part 1, Subpart J would
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-161A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-161A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-161A1.txt
  • 0.011 4 0.125** 0.181** 0.197*** 0.321 (4.75) (3.07) (2.03) (2.23) (1.05) (2.73) (3.18) (0.12) (3.08) (3.00) ( 4.47) (1.96) Land_Area_uc 0.0226 0.0142 -0.0659 0.0955 -0.214 -0.0018 0.0815 0.153 -0 .0904 -0.114 -0.128 -0.269 (0.33) (0.12) (-0.23) (0.29) (-1.45) (-0.01) (0.53) (0.65) (-1.06) (-0. 87) (-0.91) (-0.77) Land_Area_ua -0.107 0.108 0.524 -0.0237 0.140 -0.242 0.0972 0.190 -0.110 0.263 -0.413** -0.476 (-1.59) (0.51) (1.12) (-0.04) (0.56) (-1.95) (0.38) (0.50) (-0.84) (0.9 7) (-3.12) (-0.79) Percent_Water 0.905** -0.0899 -0.825 -1.349 0.167 -0.260 0.654 1.685* 0.375 -0.762 -0 .166 0.131 (3.00) (-0.21) (-0.73) (-0.94) (0.20) (-0.59) (0.84) (2.08) (0.76) (-1. 19) (-0.21) (0.07) Census_Blocs_nu 0.178** 0.192* 0.301 0.232 0.0850 0.126 -0.107 0.192 0.1 40 0.0200 0.0809 -0.352 (2.95) (1.99) (1.71) (0.98) (0.82) (1.17) (-0.75) (1.02)
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-98-26A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-98-26A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-98-26A1.txt
  • satellite licensed to GE Americom. Primestar is not itself a Commission licensee. The International Telecommunication Union (ITU) is an intergovernmental organization through which countries coordinate the use of radio frequencies. DBS Order at � 84. In 1994, when it created the International Bureau, the Commission granted the Bureau authority over all satellite services, including DBS and FSS. 47 C.F.R. � 0.51. See Amendment of Parts 0, 1, 25, 43, 64 and 73 of the Commission's Rules to Reflect a Reorganization Establishing the International Bureau, FCC 94-252 (1994). Subscription Video Services (Report and Order), 2 FCC2d 1001 (1987)(Subscription Video), aff'd., National Assoc. for Better Broadcasting v. FCC, 849 F.2d 665 (D.C. Cir. 1988). The Regional Administrative Radio Conference in 1983 (RARC-83) developed
• http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/fcc99404.doc http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/fcc99404.pdf http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/fcc99404.txt
  • a half day to a full day longer to fulfill for competitive LEC customers, and the monthly differences were usually statistically significant, with the exception of July for residential dispatch orders, for which the difference was not statistically significant. The four month average (June-September) difference for resale POTS orders is 1.18 days for dispatch business, 0.80 days for dispatch residential, 0.51 days for non-dispatch business, and 0.87 days for non-dispatch residential. Bell Atlantic Dowell/Canny Decl. Attach. D; Bell Atlantic Dowell/Canny Reply Decl. Attach. C. The difference in times was greater for UNE platform orders, for the same time period, and were always statistically significant. Competitive LEC UNE platform non-dispatch orders took from 0.8 to 2.0 days longer for June through August,
• http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/fcc01029.doc http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/fcc01029.pdf http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/fcc01029.txt
  • Aggregate Performance Data, Measurement Nos. 27 and 29, Kansas and Oklahoma, at 271-No. 27b and 271-No. 27b. See SWBT Aggregated Performance Data, Measurement No. 35c, at 271-No. 35c. For timeliness, see SWBT Aggregate Performance Data, Measurement No. 27-05, Kansas and Oklahoma, at 271-No. 27b (disparity of 1.05 days in July and 0.12 day in August in Kansas and disparity of 0.51 day in Oklahoma in August); Measurement No. 29-06, Oklahoma, at 271-No. 29b (disparity of 4.54 percent in July, 0.6 percent in September and 0.63 percent in October.) For quality, see Measurement No. 35-12, Oklahoma, at 271-No. 35c (disparity of 0.73 percent in July and August; 1.1 percent in September, and 0.2 percent in October). See SWBT Aggregate Performance Data, Measure
• http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/fcc01269.doc http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/fcc01269.pdf http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/fcc01269.txt
  • identifying and resolving stand-alone bills would require significant effort.'' Id. After Verizon implemented a series of software modifications, however, KPMG performed additional tests and concluded on September 14, 2000 that this exception could be closed. Id. Verizon McLean/Wierzbicki/Webster Reply Decl. at paras. 38-40; Verizon Aug. 17 Ex Parte Letter at 4 (reporting the percent of disputed directory advertising charges as 0.51 percent for February, 1.09 percent for March, 0.09 percent for April, 0.17 percent for May and 0.08 percent for June). As Z-Tel acknowledges in its comments, some nominal level of dispute over wholesale billing is to be expected in any large-volume, carrier-to-carrier relationship. See Z-Tel Comments at 11 (Z-Tel disputes two-to-three percent of its bill in states such as Massachusetts,
• http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Orders/2000/fcc00368.pdf
  • the spectrum is expressed, i.e., an application for construction permit is filed that is short-spaced to the Class C station but would be fully spaced to a Class C0 assignment. Triggering applicants may utilize the contour protection provisions of Section 73.215 of the Commission's rules.50 The Section 73.207 and 73.215(e) spacing tables will be modified to accommodate the new Class C0.51 The triggering application must certify that no alternative channel is available for the proposed service.52 Copies of the triggering application and related pleadings must be served on the licensee whose 50 47 C.F.R. � 73.215. 51 New Class C0 FM minimum distance separation requirements under Section 73.207(b)(1) of the Commission's rules are set forth in Appendix C. As is the
• http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireline_Competition/Orders/2002/fcc02118.pdf
  • Trouble Report Rate MR-2-02-2100 Network Trouble Report Rate � Loop 0.92 0.26 0.77 0.29 0.57 0.24 0.67 0.2 0.58 0.25 MR-2-03-2100 Network Trouble Report Rate � Central Office 0.14 0.15 0.06 0.04 0.04 0.03 0.05 0.06 0.06 0.1 MR-2-04-2100 % Subsequent Reports 11.59 9.64 10.31 0 11.71 1.92 3.92 2.9 MR-2-05-2100 % CPE/TOK/FOK Trouble Report Rate 0.82 0.28 0.65 0.31 0.51 0.15 0.26 0.26 MR-3 � Missed Repair Appointments MR-3-01-2110 % Missed Repair Appointment � Loop Bus. 16.4 9.76 10.75 8 10.65 13.95 13.94 5.56 16.72 4.76 MR-3-01-2120 % Missed Repair Appointment � Loop Res. 9.27 0 7.58 0 8.44 0 8.24 0 8.01 0 a,b,c,d,e MR-3-02-2110 % Missed Repair Appointment � Central Office Bus. 1.81 3.85 0 0 2.22 0
• http://transition.fcc.gov/mb/databases/cdbs/index.html
  • FTP: [21]all-cdbs-files.zip HTTP: [22]all-cdbs-files.zip (114.41 MB) Individual CDBS Public Files sizes (zipped file sizes): am_ant_sys.zip [ [23]FTP | [24]HTTP ] (1.72 MB) am_augs.zip [ [25]FTP | [26]HTTP ] (0.44 MB) am_eng_data.zip [ [27]FTP | [28]HTTP ] (0.29 MB) am_towers.zip [ [29]FTP | [30]HTTP ] (1.02 MB) amcmnts.zip [ [31]FTP | [32]HTTP ] (0.01 MB) ant_make.zip [ [33]FTP | [34]HTTP ] (0.51 MB) ant_pattern.zip [ [35]FTP | [36]HTTP ] (5.99 MB) app_party.zip [ [37]FTP | [38]HTTP ] (13.57 MB) app_tracking.zip [ [39]FTP | [40]HTTP ] (4.14 MB) application.zip [ [41]FTP | [42]HTTP ] (18.53 MB) call_sign_history.zip [ [43]FTP | [44]HTTP ] (1.34 MB) dtv_agreement_group.zip [ [45]FTP | [46]HTTP ] (0.01 MB) dtv_allotment.zip [ [47]FTP | [48]HTTP ] (0.04 MB) dtv_channel_assignments.zip [ [49]FTP
• http://transition.fcc.gov/ownership/materials/already-released/consumer090002.pdf
  • 2.03 AC/Full Service (FS) 1 0.02 AC/NR 42 0.67 AC/Oldies (O) 5 0.09 AC/SAC 8 0.13 AOR 565 10.32 AOR 375 5.94 AOR/AC 5 0.09 AOR/AC 3 0.05 Black (B) 281 5.13 AOR/NR 200 3.17 B/AC 13 0.24 AOR/P 80 1.27 B/Gospel (G) 4 0.07 B 236 3.74 B/O 3 0.05 B/AC 107 1.69 B/Talk (T) 4 0.07 B/G 32 0.51 Big Band/Nostalgia (BB) 213 3.89 B/O 26 0.41 BB/EZ 7 0.13 B/T 6 0.1 BB/FS 5 0.09 BB 315 4.99 BB/O 1 0.02 BB/EZ 3 0.05 Country (C) 772 14.1 BB/REL 1 0.02 C/FS 20 0.37 BB/T 1 0.02 CHR 488 8.91 C 904 14.32 CHR/AC 15 0.27 C/FS 14 0.22 CHR/Spanish (SP) 3 0.05 CHR 410 6.49 CHR/Urban (U)
• http://transition.fcc.gov/ownership/materials/already-released/survivor090002.pdf
  • Ad Volume Total Ad Volume as Percentage of GDP Total Video Ad Volume as Percentage of GDP Total Broadcast Ad Volume as Percentage of GDP Total Cable Ad Volume as Percentage of GDP 1975 1,635,200 27,900 5,263 5,263 0 1.71 0.32 0.32 0 1980 2,795,600 53,570 11,488 11,416 72 1.92 0.41 0.41 0.0026 1985 4,213,000 94,900 21,287 20,298 989 2.25 0.51 0.48 0.0235 1990 5,803,200 129,968 29,247 26,616 2,631 2.24 0.50 0.46 0.0453 1991 5,986,200 128,352 28,606 25,461 3,145 2.14 0.48 0.43 0.0525 1992 6,318,900 133,750 31,079 27,249 3,830 2.12 0.49 0.43 0.0606 1993 6,642,300 140,956 32,471 28,020 4,451 2.12 0.49 0.42 0.0670 1994 7,054,300 153,024 36,342 31,133 5,209 2.17 0.52 0.44 0.0738 1995 7,400,500 165,147 38,886 32,720 6,166 2.23 0.53
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/conferences/combin2001/papers/vsmith.pdf
  • 65.0 (61.0) 80.4 (91.0) Table 8: Count of 100% Efficient Outcomes by Treatment: Superadditive Environment Nonflexible Flexible Equal 5 (n=26) 2 (n=29) Unequal 0 (n=27) 2 (n=25) Table 9: Linear Model Parameter Estimates for Efficiency: Superadditive Environment Variable Estimate p-value Intercept 68.7 0.0 Flexible 6.29 0.002 Unequal 2.69 0.16 Level of Synergy (Medium) -3.04 0.25 Level of Synergy (High) -0.88 0.51 Number of Bidders -1.69 0.48 Overlap 3.31 0.05 CE Exists -3.25 0.11 Table 10: Normalized (Mean, Median) Revenue: Additive Environment Treatments Nonflexible Flexible Equal 1.41, 1.31 1.45, 1.45 Unequal 1.39, 1.39 1.31, 1.29 Table 11: Linear Model Parameter Estimates for Normalized Revenue: Additive Environment Variable Estimate p-value Intercept 1.46 0.0 Flexible -0.01 0.84 Unequal 0.04 0.21 Environment Pairing -0.01 0.91
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/rss/index.htm?job=ainf&id=70
  • 114 qualified bidders) * PWBs = Provisionally Winning Bidders http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/default.htm?job=auction_summary&id=70T hu, 22 Mar 2007 19:55:01 GMT Summary Permits: 120 construction permits in the FM broadcast service Qualified Bidders: 114 Rounds Completed: 67 Bidding Days: 12 Results for Round 67 Gross Revenue: $24,418,400.00 - Dollar Change: $33,000.00 - % Change: 0.14 Net Revenue: $21,258,825.00 - Dollar Change: $108,800.00 - % Change: 0.51 New Bids: 2 Withdrawn Bids: 0 Proactive Waivers: 0 Bidders that Reduced Eligibility: 0 Permits with PWBs*: 111 FCC Held Permits: 9 Eligible Bidders: 60 (of 114 qualified bidders) * PWBs = Provisionally Winning Bidders http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/default.htm?job=auction_summary&id=70T hu, 22 Mar 2007 20:45:00 GMT Summary Permits: 120 construction permits in the FM broadcast service Qualified Bidders: 114 Rounds Completed: 52 Bidding Days:
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/rss/index.htm?job=ainf&id=79
  • 1 Permits with PWBs*: 85 FCC Held Permits: 37 Eligible Bidders: 56 (of 77 qualified bidders) * PWBs = Provisionally Winning Bidders http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/default.htm?job=auction_summary&id=79T hu, 10 Sep 2009 19:50:02 GMT Summary Permits: 122 construction permits for FM Broadcast Qualified Bidders: 77 Rounds Completed: 30 Bidding Days: 7 Results for Round 30 Gross Revenue: $5,884,500.00 - Dollar Change: $29,800.00 - % Change: 0.51 Net Revenue: $4,970,575.00 - Dollar Change: $51,975.00 - % Change: 1.06 New Bids: 12 Withdrawn Bids: 0 Proactive Waivers: 0 Bidders that Reduced Eligibility: 1 Permits with PWBs*: 85 FCC Held Permits: 37 Eligible Bidders: 56 (of 77 qualified bidders) * PWBs = Provisionally Winning Bidders http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/default.htm?job=auction_summary&id=79T hu, 10 Sep 2009 21:05:02 GMT Summary Permits: 122 construction permits for FM
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Cable/Reports/fcc00214.doc
  • GROUP 1998 1999 1998 1999 Installation $29.41 $28.18 $35.20 $34.94 Standard Error 0 0 0.55 0.59 Disconnection $0.28 $0.31 $0.42 $0.48 Standard Error 0 0 0.12 0.13 Reconnection $21.20 $21.53 $21.88 $21.89 Standard Error 0 0 0.37 0.37 Tier Change $8.98 $8.42 $8.39 $8.55 Standard Error 0 0 0.41 0.39 Additional Outlet $9.21 $10.49 $12.73 $12.55 Standard Error 0 0 0.51 0.60 ATTACHMENT B-8 OPERATORS' EXPLANATION FOR CHANGES IN MONTHLY RATES FOR COMPETITIVE AND NONCOMPETITIVE GROUPS 1999 1998 RATE CHANGES ATTRIBUTED TO: Competitive % of Total NonComp % of Total Competitive % of Total NonComp % of Total Programming: Sports $0.23 16.5% $0.30 17.6% $0.18 11.8% $0.27 13.5% Standard Error 0 0.03 0 0.02 News $0.05 3.6% $0.07 4.1% $0.04 2.6%
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/fcc99404.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/fcc99404.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/fcc99404.txt
  • a half day to a full day longer to fulfill for competitive LEC customers, and the monthly differences were usually statistically significant, with the exception of July for residential dispatch orders, for which the difference was not statistically significant. The four month average (June-September) difference for resale POTS orders is 1.18 days for dispatch business, 0.80 days for dispatch residential, 0.51 days for non-dispatch business, and 0.87 days for non-dispatch residential. Bell Atlantic Dowell/Canny Decl. Attach. D; Bell Atlantic Dowell/Canny Reply Decl. Attach. C. The difference in times was greater for UNE platform orders, for the same time period, and were always statistically significant. Competitive LEC UNE platform non-dispatch orders took from 0.8 to 2.0 days longer for June through August,
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/fcc01029.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/fcc01029.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/fcc01029.txt
  • Aggregate Performance Data, Measurement Nos. 27 and 29, Kansas and Oklahoma, at 271-No. 27b and 271-No. 27b. See SWBT Aggregated Performance Data, Measurement No. 35c, at 271-No. 35c. For timeliness, see SWBT Aggregate Performance Data, Measurement No. 27-05, Kansas and Oklahoma, at 271-No. 27b (disparity of 1.05 days in July and 0.12 day in August in Kansas and disparity of 0.51 day in Oklahoma in August); Measurement No. 29-06, Oklahoma, at 271-No. 29b (disparity of 4.54 percent in July, 0.6 percent in September and 0.63 percent in October.) For quality, see Measurement No. 35-12, Oklahoma, at 271-No. 35c (disparity of 0.73 percent in July and August; 1.1 percent in September, and 0.2 percent in October). See SWBT Aggregate Performance Data, Measure
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/fcc01269.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/fcc01269.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/fcc01269.txt
  • identifying and resolving stand-alone bills would require significant effort.'' Id. After Verizon implemented a series of software modifications, however, KPMG performed additional tests and concluded on September 14, 2000 that this exception could be closed. Id. Verizon McLean/Wierzbicki/Webster Reply Decl. at paras. 38-40; Verizon Aug. 17 Ex Parte Letter at 4 (reporting the percent of disputed directory advertising charges as 0.51 percent for February, 1.09 percent for March, 0.09 percent for April, 0.17 percent for May and 0.08 percent for June). As Z-Tel acknowledges in its comments, some nominal level of dispute over wholesale billing is to be expected in any large-volume, carrier-to-carrier relationship. See Z-Tel Comments at 11 (Z-Tel disputes two-to-three percent of its bill in states such as Massachusetts,
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2002/fcc02331.pdf
  • 1,2,4,5 A.2.12.6.1.1ISDN/<10 circuits/Dispatch/FL (%) 7.28% 0.00% 6.50% 33.33% 6.57% 0.00% 6.99% 33.33% 1.59% 0.00%1,2,3,4,5 A.2.12.6.1.2ISDN/<10 circuits/Non-Dispatch/FL (%) 0.62% 0.00% 0.74% 5.56% 0.91% 0.00% 0.66% 0.00% 0.86% 0.00% 3,5 A.2.12.6.2.1ISDN/>=10 circuits/Dispatch/FL (%) 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.63% 0.00% 5 A.2.12.6.2.2ISDN/>=10 circuits/Non-Dispatch/FL (%) 0.00% 0.00% 1.69% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 1,4,5 Average Completion Notice Interval - Mechanized A.2.14.1.1.1Residence/<10 circuits/Dispatch/FL (hours) 4.11 0.51 3.97 1.26 6.97 0.48 6.23 0.29 5.25 0.04 A.2.14.1.1.2Residence/<10 circuits/Non- Dispatch/FL (hours) 0.94 0.79 1.10 0.86 1.27 0.78 1.02 0.72 0.92 0.73 A.2.14.1.2.1Residence/>=10 circuits/Dispatch/FL (hours) 3.51 0.27 2.57 2.03 4.42 1.75 4.10 0.14 1.74 0.02 1,2,3,4,5 A.2.14.2.1.1Business/<10 circuits/Dispatch/FL (hours) 3.00 1.07 5.32 0.76 5.18 0.43 3.97 0.40 3.92 0.03 A.2.14.2.1.2Business/<10 circuits/Non- Dispatch/FL (hours) 3.35 0.78 2.54 0.91 1.67 0.83 1.37
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ias0609_tables.doc
  • 0.41 Missouri 1,269 2,323 0.55 Montana 212 385 0.55 Nebraska 425 698 0.61 Nevada 608 1,015 0.60 New Hampshire 379 514 0.74 New Jersey 2,430 3,202 0.76 New Mexico 388 748 0.52 New York 5,078 7,297 0.70 North Carolina 2,172 3,617 0.60 North Dakota 155 255 0.61 Northern Mariana Isl * 14 * Ohio 2,735 4,495 0.61 Oklahoma 731 1,423 0.51 Oregon 914 1,489 0.61 Pennsylvania 3,165 4,831 0.66 Puerto Rico 387 1,262 0.31 Rhode Island 282 418 0.67 South Carolina 943 1,721 0.55 South Dakota 179 310 0.58 Tennessee 1,233 2,455 0.50 Texas 4,981 8,730 0.57 Utah 528 858 0.62 Vermont 155 247 0.63 Virgin Islands 10 41 0.26 Virginia 1,890 3,003 0.63 Washington 1,663 2,533 0.66 West Virginia 360
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ias0611_tables.doc
  • by State as of June 30, 2011 (Connections with advertised speeds at least 3 mbps down and 768 up and households, in thousands) State Connections Households Subscribership Ratio Alabama 424 1,867 0.23 Alaska * 252 * American Samoa 0 9 0.00 Arizona 993 2,464 0.40 Arkansas 215 1,144 0.19 California 5,565 12,634 0.44 Colorado 1,056 1,978 0.53 Connecticut 696 1,358 0.51 Delaware 226 343 0.66 District of Columbia 150 270 0.55 Florida 3,069 7,344 0.42 Georgia 1,262 3,697 0.34 Guam * 39 * Hawaii * 436 * Idaho 100 575 0.17 Illinois 1,704 4,803 0.35 Indiana 815 2,493 0.33 Iowa 253 1,197 0.21 Kansas 276 1,101 0.25 Kentucky 567 1,718 0.33 Louisiana 473 1,694 0.28 Maine 120 539 0.22 Maryland 1,403
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ias1209_tables.doc
  • New York 5,092 7,339 0.69 North Carolina 2,269 3,737 0.61 North Dakota 165 262 0.63 Northern Mariana Isl * 14 * Ohio 2,814 4,540 0.62 Oklahoma 755 1,455 0.52 Oregon 929 1,522 0.61 Pennsylvania 3,257 4,927 0.66 Puerto Rico 423 1,262 0.34 Rhode Island 285 410 0.70 South Carolina 979 1,783 0.55 South Dakota 189 317 0.60 Tennessee 1,270 2,511 0.51 Texas 5,212 8,977 0.58 Utah 567 894 0.63 Vermont 159 248 0.64 Virgin Islands 11 41 0.28 Virginia 1,944 3,052 0.64 Washington 1,670 2,615 0.64 West Virginia 386 747 0.52 Wisconsin 1,374 2,220 0.62 Wyoming 127 219 0.58 Total 73,366 117,671 0.62 # = Rounds to Zero; * = Data withheld to maintain firm confidentiality. Note: Figures may not sum
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ias1210_tables.doc
  • speeds at least 3 mbps down and 768 up and households, in thousands) State Connections Households Subscribership Ratio Alabama 389 1,867 0.21 Alaska * 252 * American Samoa 0 9 0.00 Arizona 988 2,464 0.40 Arkansas 202 1,144 0.18 California 5,137 12,634 0.41 Colorado 988 1,978 0.50 Connecticut 658 1,358 0.48 Delaware 210 343 0.61 District of Columbia 137 270 0.51 Florida 2,883 7,344 0.39 Georgia 1,104 3,697 0.30 Guam * 39 * Hawaii * 436 * Idaho 85 575 0.15 Illinois 1,588 4,803 0.33 Indiana 760 2,493 0.30 Iowa 194 1,197 0.16 Kansas 251 1,101 0.23 Kentucky 511 1,718 0.30 Louisiana 466 1,694 0.28 Maine 104 539 0.19 Maryland 1,304 2,158 0.60 Massachusetts 1,640 2,568 0.64 Michigan 1,369 3,808 0.36
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ldrpt103.pdf
  • 0.90 1936 0.25 3.20 1976 0.29 0.89 1937 0.22 2.67 1977 0.28 0.83 1938 0.21 2.69 1978 0.29 0.78 1939 0.22 2.75 1979 0.29 0.71 1940 0.21 2.66 1980 0.30 0.65 1941 0.21 2.50 1981 0.33 0.64 1942 0.22 2.34 1982 0.34 0.63 1943 0.21 2.15 1983 0.35 0.62 1944 0.22 2.17 1984 0.32 0.55 1945 0.21 2.09 1985 0.31 0.51 1946 0.20 1.79 1986 0.28 0.45 1947 0.19 1.52 1987 0.25 0.38 1948 0.19 1.37 1988 0.23 0.35 1949 0.19 1.40 1989 0.22 0.31 1950 0.19 1.42 1990 0.20 0.27 1951 0.20 1.37 1991 0.20 0.26 1952 0.20 1.35 1992 0.19 0.24 $1.01 $0.15 1953 0.21 1.38 1993 0.19 0.24 1.02 0.15 1954 0.22 1.47 1994 0.18 0.21 0.93 0.14
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/pntris03.pdf
  • 2.9%* Georgia 1991 3.43 69.1% 81.6% 86.0% 12.5% * 4.4% 85.9% 90.4% 94.8% 4.5% * 4.4%* Hawaii 1987 0.00 76.1% 89.9% 93.9% 13.8% * 4.0% 94.0% 94.9% 97.8% 0.9% 2.9% Idaho 1987 3.48 78.4% 87.9% 88.2% 9.4% * 0.3% 90.6% 95.0% 95.5% 4.4% * 0.5% Illinois 1998 1.65 87.8% 83.2% 80.0% -4.6% -3.2% 95.6% 93.5% 92.3% -2.0% -1.3% Indiana 1998 0.51 80.4% 91.6% 87.5% 11.2% * -4.2% 92.0% 94.3% 94.1% 2.2% -0.2% Iowa 1998 0.03 89.7% 87.7% 93.2% -2.0% 5.4% 95.8% 96.1% 96.7% 0.3% 0.7% Kansas 1998 3.50 86.5% 87.0% 89.1% 0.4% 2.1% 94.5% 94.9% 96.0% 0.4% 1.1% Kentucky 1998 3.48 72.1% 87.7% 84.7% 15.6% * -3.0% 87.1% 93.1% 94.2% 6.0% * 1.1% Louisiana 1998 0.00 80.9% 81.7% 82.8% 0.8% 1.1%
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref02.pdf
  • 0.56 0.15 57 Electronic components and accessories 137,134 621 0.45 0.18 58Miscellaneous electircal machinery and supplies 27,477 74 0.27 0.02 59AMotor vehicles (passenger cars and trucks) 230,676 262 0.11 0.08 59B Truck/bus bodies, trailers, and motor vehicle 135,108 266 0.20 0.08 60Aircraft parts 129,376 263 0.20 0.08 61Other transportation equipment 44,133 98 0.22 0.03 62Scientific and controlling instruments 133,097 684 0.51 0.20 63Opthalmic and photographic equipment 20,721 129 0.62 0.04 64Miscellaneous manufacturing 50,585 172 0.34 0.05 65ARailroads, and related services 79,667 532 0.67 0.15 65BMotor freight transportation and warehousing 230,207 2,791 1.21 0.81 65CWater transportation 38,469 48 0.12 0.01 65DAir transportation 142,881 1,477 1.03 0.43 65EPipelines, freight forwarders and related services 39,469 1,393 3.53 0.41 66Communications, except radio and TV 343,786
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref03.pdf
  • $53.12 $52.95 $52.63 $52.29 $53.66 $53.10 $54.06 $53.98 Monthly Charge for Flat-Rate Service $49.40 $49.36 $51.49 $51.24 $51.21 $51.05 $51.09 $50.92 $50.46 $51.13 $49.25 $49.06 $49.54 $49.26 Subscriber Line Charges 5.68 5.68 5.55 5.52 6.02 6.16 6.17 6.10 6.61 6.93 7.70 7.87 7.47 7.11 Extra for Touch-Tone Service 3.29 2.65 2.32 2.29 2.14 1.40 1.28 1.15 0.73 0.63 0.61 0.53 0.51 0.38 Taxes, 911, and Other Charges 7.44 7.49 7.75 7.95 7.98 7.95 8.12 8.09 8.08 8.68 7.99 8.11 9.44 9.17 Total Monthly Charge for Flat-Rate Service $65.81 $65.19 $67.11 $66.99 $67.36 $66.56 $66.66 $66.26 $65.87 $67.36 $65.55 $65.58 $66.96 $65.44 Number of Sample Cities with Flat-Rate Service 53 56 54 54 54 53 53 53 53 54 54 54 54
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ror96.pdf
  • OF NEVADA 12.44 11.00 27.20 8.66 (534.12) 18.97 11.20 4CENTRAL TELEPHONE CO. OF NORTH CAROLINA 11.29 12.31 16.12 14.01 (100.92) 3.91 7.24 5CENTRAL TELEPHONE CO. OF TEXAS 14.94 14.08 19.77 22.77 7.37 16.42 6CENTRAL TELEPHONE CO. OF VIRGINIA 12.91 12.06 16.80 15.93 11.45 14.11 7ALLTEL ILLINOIS, INC. 12.97 12.50 15.02 9.70 27.51 13.01 8C-R TELEPHONE COMPANY 7.54 12.66 (6.76) 4.79 (0.51) 3.27 9CENTURY TELEPHONE OF OHIO, INC. 1/ 10.66 21.7 22.01 10.05 (14.93) 0.30 10CHILLICOTHE TELEPHONE COMPANY, THE 2/ 11.92 11.23 10.08 14.14 13.27 14.00 11CINCINNATI BELL TELEPHONE COMPANY 2/ 10.41 9.70 9.39 12.78 (146.35) 14.25 11.81 12CITIZENS TELEPHONE COMPANY 9.89 12.71 25.13 6.44 8.64 6.86 13CITIZENS UTILITIES COMPANY 11.64 12.52 9.36 10.55 14GREAT PLAINS COMMUNICATIONS, INC. 2/ 13.19 12.06 18.37
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/strev-95.pdf
  • LOUISIANA 1,129 1,680 2,809 1.41 MAINE 424 461 886 0.45 MARYLAND 1,779 2,091 3,869 1.94 MASSACHUSETTS 2,457 2,670 5,127 2.58 MICHIGAN 2,265 4,320 6,586 3.31 MINNESOTA 1,373 1,769 3,142 1.58 MISSISSIPPI 727 918 1,645 0.83 MISSOURI 1,684 2,110 3,794 1.91 MONTANA 307 338 646 0.32 NEBRASKA 553 785 1,338 0.67 NEVADA 2,075 1,151 3,226 1.62 NEW HAMPSHIRE 580 425 1,005 0.51 NEW JERSEY 3,618 3,541 7,159 3.60 NEW MEXICO 595 557 1,152 0.58 NEW YORK 6,860 8,732 15,592 7.84 NORTH CAROLINA 2,332 3,373 5,705 2.87 NORTH DAKOTA 236 267 503 0.25 OHIO 3,081 5,306 8,387 4.21 OKLAHOMA 938 1,101 2,039 1.02 OREGON 1,098 1,181 2,280 1.15 PENNSYLVANIA 3,606 4,583 8,189 4.12 RHODE ISLAND 391 312 703 0.35 SOUTH CAROLINA 1,178 1,558
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/strev-96.pdf
  • DIST. OF COLUMBIA 0 0.00 2,712 0.25 (2,712) (0.25) FLORIDA 6,119 0.05 29,314 0.25 (23,195) (0.20) GEORGIA 17,644 0.33 12,443 0.23 5,201 0.10 HAWAII 252 0.03 2,087 0.25 (1,835) (0.22) IDAHO 2,530 0.33 1,811 0.24 719 0.09 ILLINOIS 5,266 0.06 22,716 0.25 (17,449) (0.19) INDIANA 5,034 0.13 9,640 0.24 (4,605) (0.11) IOWA 7,446 0.40 4,058 0.22 3,388 0.18 KANSAS 9,261 0.51 4,250 0.23 5,011 0.27 KENTUCKY 5,267 0.22 5,470 0.23 (203) (0.01) LOUISIANA 17,421 0.62 6,536 0.23 10,884 0.39 MAINE 5,511 0.59 2,117 0.23 3,394 0.36 MARYLAND 91 0.00 10,043 0.25 (9,952) (0.25) MASSACHUSETTS 79 0.00 12,845 0.25 (12,766) (0.25) MICHIGAN 8,488 0.12 17,617 0.24 (9,129) (0.13) MINNESOTA 11,291 0.34 7,386 0.22 3,906 0.12 MISSISSIPPI 4,849 0.32 3,580 0.23 1,269 0.08
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/strev-97.pdf
  • Per Loop Contributions Contributions (Thousands) Per Loop ALABAMA $21,948 $0.76 $11,321 $0.39 $10,627 $0.37 ALASKA 31,964 6.70 2,178 0.46 29,786 6.24 ARIZONA 19,492 0.59 16,544 0.50 2,948 0.09 ARKANSAS 46,090 2.81 6,844 0.42 39,246 2.39 CALIFORNIA 28,887 0.11 79,394 0.31 (50,507) (0.20) COLORADO 29,084 0.92 16,656 0.53 12,428 0.39 CONNECTICUT 0 0.00 13,693 0.53 (13,693) (0.53) DELAWARE 0 0.00 3,230 0.51 (3,230) (0.51) DIST. OF COLUMBIA 0 0.00 4,483 0.41 (4,483) (0.41) FLORIDA 11,301 0.09 54,865 0.44 (43,564) (0.35) GEORGIA 41,660 0.73 26,689 0.47 14,971 0.26 HAWAII 0 0.00 3,374 0.40 (3,374) (0.40) IDAHO 19,506 2.39 4,203 0.51 15,303 1.87 ILLINOIS 5,717 0.06 35,882 0.37 (30,165) (0.31) INDIANA 2,923 0.07 15,279 0.37 (12,356) (0.30) IOWA 5,682 0.30 8,032 0.42 (2,350) (0.12)
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/strev-99.pdf
  • Alaska 38,841 0 38,841 7.06 2,152 0.39 36,690 6.67 Arizona 19,902 0 19,902 0.56 17,594 0.49 2,307 0.06 Arkansas 43,208 3,100 46,309 2.57 7,208 0.40 39,100 2.17 California 22,377 6,176 28,553 0.10 80,865 0.30 -52,311 -0.19 Colorado 26,831 1,265 28,096 0.82 17,712 0.52 10,384 0.30 Connecticut 0 0 0 0.00 13,967 0.48 -13,967 -0.48 Delaware 0 0 0 0.00 3,536 0.51 -3,536 -0.51 Dist. of Columbia 0 0 0 0.00 5,017 0.45 -5,017 -0.45 Florida 10,582 0 10,582 0.08 59,126 0.44 -48,544 -0.36 Georgia 42,691 0 42,691 0.68 28,217 0.45 14,474 0.23 Hawaii 379 0 379 0.04 3,361 0.39 -2,982 -0.34 Idaho 18,866 0 18,866 2.14 4,389 0.50 14,477 1.65 Illinois 6,704 0 6,704 0.07 38,542 0.39 -31,838 -0.32 Indiana 4,799
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend100.pdf
  • 28,381,501 114,791,126 94,230,968 1.96 GTE 42,154,416 144,796,013 120,338,984 2.51 IDT Corporation 222,337,221 1,563,714,187 119,251,899 2.49 Incomnet Communications Corporation 3,333,603 23,572,181 18,417,609 0.38 Intermedia Communications, Inc. 20,464,294 409,285,878 28,461,882 0.59 IXC Communications Services, Inc. 20,370,405 71,296,419 33,709,927 0.70 Justice Technology Corporation 8,486,088 44,127,658 15,886,195 0.33 Long Distance International, Inc. (LDI) 5,656,846 16,008,875 40,159,459 0.84 Long Distance Wholesale Club 4,401,655 45,502,453 24,433,300 0.51 MATRIX Telecom 2,726,082 19,537,503 13,826,460 0.29 MCI WorldCom, Inc. 424,620,707 1,980,576,745 682,600,714 14.23 NETMoves Corp. 8,792,257 15,609,896 10,197,054 0.21 Network Plus, Inc. 30,932,343 114,449,680 40,893,432 0.85 NOS Communications, Inc. 6,313,726 36,421,960 14,042,810 0.29 Omnipoint Communications, Inc. 841,242 6,660,776 11,218,399 0.23 Primus Telecommunications, Inc. 126,024,284 658,905,556 210,977,592 4.40 Progress International, L.L.C. (Progress) 7,574,145 49,989,356 12,497,339 0.26 Q Telecommunications International Corporation 6,768,474
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend199.pdf
  • Distance JanuaryDecemberPercentageJanuaryDecemberPercentage (in airline miles, 1984 1998 Change 1984 1998 Change rate center to rate center) 1 - 10Day $0.96 $1.40 45.8% $0.96 $1.82 89.3% Evening 0.57 0.80 40.4 0.57 1.82 218.9 Night & Weekend 0.38 0.65 71.1 0.38 1.82 378.3 11 - 22Day 1.28 $1.40 9.4 1.28 1.82 42.0 Evening 0.76 0.80 5.3 0.76 1.82 139.1 Night & Weekend 0.51 0.65 27.5 0.51 1.82 256.4 23 - 55Day 1.60 $1.40 -12.5 1.60 1.82 13.6 Evening 0.96 0.80 -16.7 0.96 1.82 89.3 Night & Weekend 0.64 0.65 1.6 0.64 1.82 184.0 56 - 124Day 2.05 $1.40 -31.7 2.05 1.82 -11.3 Evening 1.22 0.80 -34.4 1.22 1.82 49.0 Night & Weekend 0.82 0.65 -20.7 0.82 1.82 121.6 125 - 292Day 2.14 $1.40
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend200.pdf
  • 1.00 5.89 135 12 365 23 1994 13,393 2,313 12,255 0.92 5.30 123 12 432 55 1995 15,837 2,821 13,990 0.88 4.96 119 6 432 55 1996 19,119 3,485 14,079 0.74 4.04 119 5 649 26 1997 22,611 4,233 15,135 0.67 3.58 110 4 840 36 1998 24,026 4,439 14,154 0.59 3.19 64 2 902 21 1999 27,966 5,215 14,398 0.51 2.76 57 2 1,181 20 Source: Industry Analysis Division, Trends in the International Telecommunications Industry; Section 43.61 International Telecommunications Data. 1999 data are preliminary. Note: Data represent traffic and circuits from domestic U.S. points to foreign points. 1/Billed revenue per minute for international service differs in Table 14.5 and Table 6.1. Data in Table 14.5 are based on traffic to
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend298.pdf
  • June Percentage (in airline miles, 1984 1998 Change 1984 1998 Change rate center to rate center) 1 - 10Day $0.96 $1.40 45.8% $0.96 $1.82 89.3% Evening 0.57 0.80 40.4 0.57 1.82 218.9 Night & Weekend 0.38 0.65 71.1 0.38 1.82 378.3 11 - 22Day 1.28 $1.40 9.4 1.28 1.82 42.0 Evening 0.76 0.80 5.3 0.76 1.82 139.1 Night & Weekend 0.51 0.65 27.5 0.51 1.82 256.4 23 - 55Day 1.60 $1.40 -12.5 1.60 1.82 13.6 Evening 0.96 0.80 -16.7 0.96 1.82 89.3 Night & Weekend 0.64 0.65 1.6 0.64 1.82 184.0 56 - 124Day 2.05 $1.40 -31.7 2.05 1.82 -11.3 Evening 1.22 0.80 -34.4 1.22 1.82 49.0 Night & Weekend 0.82 0.65 -20.7 0.82 1.82 121.6 125 - 292Day 2.14 $1.40
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend299.pdf
  • 182 16 47 30 Cincinnati Bell 3.50 6.07 6.30 1.04 2.09 2.09 0.23 645 79 213 72 Citizens 3.50 5.99 9.09 1.04 2.37 4.20 1.05 709 41 121 53 Frontier 3.50 5.57 5.88 1.04 1.52 1.95 0.31 648 70 171 81 GTE 3.50 6.07 8.62 1.04 2.53 4.31 0.82 12,294 1,415 3,219 1,207 SNET 3.50 6.07 8.02 1.04 2.38 2.38 0.51 1,421 134 198 379 Sprint Local 3.50 5.84 7.42 1.01 2.05 3.78 0.52 5,018 618 1,238 451 Independent Price Caps 3.50 6.00 8.09 1.03 2.34 3.91 0.67 20,918 2,373 5,206 2,273 All Price Caps 3.50 5.84 6.98 1.04 1.77 2.94 0.42 97,890 16,444 35,265 13,846 NECA 3.50 N/A 5.95 0.00 N/A 0.00 N/A 9,287 N/A 2,104 N/A All Price Caps
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend502.pdf
  • multiplied by five and added to multiline business counts. 1 - 7 Table 1.4 Interstate Per-Minute Access Charges by Carrier (In Cents per Minute) 1/ Rates Effective from 01/01/02-06/30/02 Year 2000 Minutes of Use Carrier (Millions) Common Line per Company Originating Access CCL CCL Local Minute OriginatingTerminatingSwitching BellSouth 0.00� 0.00� 0.36� 0.18� 1.10� 27,845 57,012 83,187 Cincinnati Bell 0.00 0.00 0.51 0.21 1.49 1,042 2,162 3,215 Citizens 0.57 0.00 0.87 0.65 3.69 2,747 2,865 5,680 Global Crossing 0.05 0.00 0.61 0.41 2.15 575 1,583 2,160 Iowa Telecom 0.81 0.00 0.84 0.15 2.90 134 185 331 Qwest 0.00 0.00 0.54 0.18 1.47 21,018 39,686 61,107 SBC 0.00 0.00 0.43 0.21 1.30 64,610 92,623 158,985 Sprint 0.03 0.00 0.63 0.17 1.68 10,375 15,681
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend504.pdf
  • Cents per Minute) 1 Rates Effective from 7/1/03-06/30/04 Year 2002 Minutes of Use Carrier (Millions) Common Line per Company Originating Access Local Minute 2 OriginatingTerminating Switching ALLTEL - Nebraska 0.00� 0.00� 0.79� 0.33� 2.29� 372 369 741 BellSouth 0.00 0.00 0.36 0.24 1.23 23,475 55,742 64,411 CenturyTel 5 0.01 0.00 0.43 0.28 1.46 815 2,228 3,061 Cincinnati Bell 0.00 0.00 0.51 0.28 1.61 865 2,141 3,008 Citizens 0.04 0.00 0.61 0.47 2.26 2,245 4,035 6,282 Iowa Telecom 0.00 0.00 1.39 0.62 4.10 390 339 730 Qwest 0.00 0.00 0.57 0.16 1.51 18,088 33,606 51,941 SBC 0.00 0.00 0.41 0.19 1.23 63,965 66,731 132,324 Sprint 0.00 0.00 0.60 0.14 1.51 5,825 19,008 24,880 Valor 0.00 0.00 0.79 0.41 2.45 332 1,016 1,348
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend605.pdf
  • 0.55 0.41 1986 4,004 2,865 1,140 1,396 (1,469) 2,536 0.69 0.56 0.38 1987 4,751 3,423 1,328 1,671 (1,752) 2,999 0.71 0.59 0.39 1988 5,806 4,039 1,767 1,906 (2,133) 3,674 0.71 0.59 0.41 1989 6,912 4,735 2,177 2,213 (2,523) 4,390 0.70 0.58 0.42 1990 8,059 5,297 2,762 2,426 (2,871) 5,188 0.66 0.56 0.42 1991 9,263 5,852 3,411 2,536 (3,317) 5,946 0.65 0.51 0.42 1992 10,382 6,008 4,375 2,650 (3,357) 7,025 0.58 0.46 0.44 1993 11,564 6,372 5,192 2,667 (3,705) 7,859 0.55 0.43 0.44 1994 12,543 7,010 5,533 2,719 (4,291) 8,252 0.51 0.39 0.40 1995 14,335 7,569 6,766 2,631 (4,938) 9,397 0.48 0.35 0.40 1996 14,598 8,252 6,345 2,594 (5,658) 8,939 0.43 0.30 0.32 1997 15,661 8,031 7,630 2,602 (5,429) 10,232 0.35 0.27
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend801.pdf
  • multiplied by five and added to multiline business counts. 1 - 7 Table 1.4 Interstate Per-Minute Access Charges by Carrier (In Cents per Minute) 1/ Rates Effective from 7/1/01-12/31/01 Year 2000 Minutes of Use Carrier (Millions) Common Line per Company Originating Access CCL CCL Local Minute OriginatingTerminatingSwitching BellSouth 0.00� 0.00� 0.36� 0.18� 1.10� 27,845 57,012 83,187 Cincinnati Bell 0.00 0.00 0.51 0.21 1.49 1,042 2,162 3,215 Citizens 0.57 0.00 0.87 0.65 3.69 2,747 2,865 5,680 Global Crossing 0.05 0.00 0.61 0.41 2.15 575 1,583 2,160 Iowa Telecom 0.81 0.00 0.84 0.15 2.90 134 185 331 Qwest 0.00 0.00 0.54 0.18 1.47 21,018 39,686 61,107 SBC 0.00 0.00 0.43 0.21 1.30 64,610 92,623 158,985 Sprint 0.03 0.00 0.63 0.17 1.68 10,375 15,681
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend803.pdf
  • 0.55 0.41 1986 4,004 2,865 1,140 1,396 (1,469) 2,536 0.69 0.56 0.38 1987 4,751 3,423 1,328 1,671 (1,752) 2,999 0.71 0.59 0.39 1988 5,806 4,039 1,767 1,906 (2,133) 3,674 0.71 0.59 0.41 1989 6,912 4,735 2,177 2,213 (2,523) 4,390 0.70 0.58 0.42 1990 8,059 5,297 2,762 2,426 (2,871) 5,188 0.66 0.56 0.42 1991 9,263 5,852 3,411 2,536 (3,317) 5,946 0.65 0.51 0.42 1992 10,382 6,008 4,375 2,650 (3,357) 7,025 0.58 0.46 0.44 1993 11,564 6,372 5,192 2,667 (3,705) 7,859 0.55 0.43 0.44 1994 12,543 7,010 5,533 2,719 (4,291) 8,252 0.51 0.39 0.40 1995 14,335 7,569 6,766 2,631 (4,938) 9,397 0.48 0.35 0.40 1996 14,598 8,252 6,345 2,594 (5,658) 8,939 0.43 0.30 0.32 1997 15,661 8,031 7,630 2,602 (5,429) 10,232 0.35 0.27
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Intl/itltrd98.pdf
  • 0.50 1985 2,181 2,679 1,907 772 1,234 1,007 1.23 0.87 0.35 0.82 0.52 1986 2,643 3,054 2,305 749 1,356 1,139 1.16 0.87 0.28 0.84 0.47 1987 3,155 3,656 2,721 934 1,569 1,339 1.16 0.86 0.30 0.85 0.48 1988 3,768 4,446 3,171 1,274 1,901 1,554 1.18 0.84 0.34 0.82 0.50 1989 4,463 5,270 3,649 1,621 2,249 1,789 1.18 0.82 0.36 0.80 0.51 1990 5,276 6,306 4,198 2,109 2,543 2,009 1.20 0.80 0.40 0.79 0.53 1991 5,997 7,272 4,745 2,527 2,818 2,049 1.21 0.79 0.42 0.73 0.52 1992 6,653 8,091 4,780 3,311 3,128 2,069 1.22 0.72 0.50 0.66 0.55 1993 7,501 8,927 5,031 3,894 3,397 1,997 1.19 0.67 0.52 0.59 0.54 1994 8,950 9,716 5,554 4,161 3,698 2,006 1.09 0.62 0.46 0.54 0.49
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Intl/itltrd99.pdf
  • 0.50 1985 2,181 2,679 1,907 772 1,234 1,007 1.23 0.87 0.35 0.82 0.52 1986 2,643 3,054 2,305 749 1,356 1,139 1.16 0.87 0.28 0.84 0.47 1987 3,155 3,656 2,721 934 1,569 1,339 1.16 0.86 0.30 0.85 0.48 1988 3,768 4,446 3,171 1,274 1,901 1,554 1.18 0.84 0.34 0.82 0.50 1989 4,463 5,270 3,649 1,621 2,249 1,789 1.18 0.82 0.36 0.80 0.51 1990 5,276 6,306 4,198 2,109 2,543 2,009 1.20 0.80 0.40 0.79 0.53 1991 5,997 7,272 4,745 2,527 2,818 2,049 1.21 0.79 0.42 0.73 0.52 1992 6,653 8,091 4,780 3,311 3,128 2,069 1.22 0.72 0.50 0.66 0.55 1993 7,501 8,927 5,031 3,894 3,397 1,997 1.19 0.67 0.52 0.59 0.54 1994 8,950 9,716 5,554 4,161 3,698 2,006 1.09 0.62 0.46 0.54 0.49
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Intl/itrnd00.pdf
  • 0.56 0.38 1987 4,819.2 4,751.1 3,422.9 1,328.2 2,822.7 1,670.6 0.99 0.71 0.28 0.59 0.39 1988 5,679.4 5,806.3 4,039.1 1,767.2 3,228.2 1,906.3 1.02 0.71 0.31 0.59 0.41 1989 6,750.7 6,912.3 4,735.4 2,176.9 3,810.3 2,212.7 1.02 0.70 0.32 0.58 0.42 1990 8,029.7 8,059.0 5,297.4 2,761.6 4,340.9 2,426.3 1.00 0.66 0.34 0.56 0.42 1991 9,071.7 9,263.2 5,852.4 3,410.8 4,768.6 2,410.4 1.02 0.65 0.38 0.51 0.42 1992 10,293.8 10,382.5 6,007.7 4,374.8 5,369.7 2,481.2 1.01 0.58 0.42 0.46 0.44 1993 11,513.3 11,563.7 6,372.0 5,191.7 5,786.0 2,476.7 1.00 0.55 0.45 0.43 0.44 1994 13,615.6 12,542.9 7,009.7 5,533.2 6,384.9 2,501.8 0.92 0.51 0.41 0.39 0.40 1995 15,888.8 14,335.4 7,569.0 6,766.4 7,050.6 2,464.1 0.90 0.48 0.43 0.35 0.40 1996 19,325.1 14,597.8 8,252.3 6,345.5 8,293.2 2,450.9 0.76 0.43 0.33 0.30
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Intl/itrnd01.pdf
  • 0.56 0.38 1987 4,819.2 4,751.1 3,422.9 1,328.2 2,822.7 1,670.6 0.99 0.71 0.28 0.59 0.39 1988 5,679.4 5,806.3 4,039.1 1,767.2 3,228.2 1,906.3 1.02 0.71 0.31 0.59 0.41 1989 6,750.7 6,912.3 4,735.4 2,176.9 3,810.3 2,212.7 1.02 0.70 0.32 0.58 0.42 1990 8,029.7 8,059.0 5,297.4 2,761.6 4,340.9 2,426.3 1.00 0.66 0.34 0.56 0.42 1991 9,071.7 9,263.2 5,852.4 3,410.8 4,768.6 2,410.4 1.02 0.65 0.38 0.51 0.42 1992 10,293.8 10,382.5 6,007.7 4,374.8 5,369.7 2,481.2 1.01 0.58 0.42 0.46 0.44 1993 11,513.3 11,563.7 6,372.0 5,191.7 5,786.0 2,476.7 1.00 0.55 0.45 0.43 0.44 1994 13,615.6 12,542.9 7,009.7 5,533.2 6,384.9 2,501.8 0.92 0.51 0.41 0.39 0.40 1995 15,888.8 14,335.4 7,569.0 6,766.4 7,050.6 2,464.1 0.90 0.48 0.43 0.35 0.40 1996 19,325.1 14,597.8 8,252.3 6,345.5 8,293.2 2,450.9 0.76 0.43 0.33 0.30
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr03-1.pdf
  • 210 Mississippi 884,147 136,158 341,793 4.60 6.96 7.72 92 0.85 104 Missouri 2,102,761 361,675 809,272 4.57 5.80 6.85 207 1.91 235 Montana 360,013 28,056 162,347 4.31 7.00 8.15 37 0.34 42 Nebraska 567,175 54,602 313,174 4.54 6.14 7.18 62 0.57 70 Nevada 740,530 184,464 406,162 4.14 5.13 5.93 77 0.71 87 New Hampshire 510,848 94,012 207,060 4.59 6.40 7.88 55 0.51 62 New Jersey 3,160,492 1,378,591 2,179,089 4.67 6.18 6.25 443 4.09 502 New Mexico 608,961 75,266 294,582 4.62 7.00 9.06 72 0.67 82 New York 5,694,828 1,062,958 3,466,530 4.64 6.36 7.99 731 6.75 829 North Carolina 3,261,123 428,827 1,214,019 4.50 6.74 7.76 324 2.99 368 North Dakota 225,897 10,445 141,111 4.18 6.89 7.48 25 0.23 28 N. Mariana Islands NA
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr03-11.pdf
  • (12) 0.47 Verizon - North - Michigan MI (33,604) (33,547) (58) 0.17 SBC - Ameritech - Michigan MI 121,795 122,463 (669) (0.55) Qwest - Minnesota MN NA NA NA NA BellSouth - Mississippi MS (12,020) (12,036) 17 (0.14) SBC - Southwestern Bell - Missouri MO 55,301 55,498 (200) (0.36) Sprint - United Telephone Company of Missouri MO 4,917 4,941 (25) (0.51) Qwest - Montana MT NA NA NA NA Aliant Telecommunications - Nebraska NE (111) (82) (29) 26.13 Qwest - Nebraska NE NA NA NA NA Sprint - Centel of Nevada NV (298) (189) (109) 36.58 Verizon - Contel Nevada NV (103) (49) (54) 52.43 SBC - Nevada Bell NV 1,102 1,183 (81) (7.35) Verizon - New England - New Hampshire
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr03-2.pdf
  • 9.50 9.50 9.50 13.00 13.00 13.00 Hawaii 7.75 7.75 7.75 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 7.75 7.75 7.75 7.75 7.75 7.75 Idaho 6.75 7.75 7.75 0.00 3.50 3.48 0.00 1.75 1.74 6.75 9.50 9.49 6.75 13.00 12.97 Illinois 6.24 7.75 6.65 0.00 3.50 1.65 0.00 1.75 0.82 6.24 9.50 7.47 6.24 13.00 9.12 Indiana 7.27 7.75 7.38 0.00 0.66 0.51 0.00 0.33 0.25 7.27 8.08 7.64 7.27 8.74 8.15 Iowa 5.25 7.75 6.92 0.00 3.50 0.03 0.00 1.75 0.01 5.25 9.50 6.93 5.25 13.00 6.96 Kansas 5.25 7.75 7.07 0.00 3.50 3.50 0.00 1.75 1.75 5.25 9.50 8.82 5.25 13.00 12.31 Kentucky 6.94 7.75 7.67 2.56 3.50 3.48 1.28 1.75 1.74 8.22 9.50 9.41 10.78 13.00 12.89 Louisiana 6.75 7.75
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr03-3.pdf
  • 1.20 Texas 0.69 0.00 0.19 0.24 0.05 0.12 1.28 Utah 0.47 0.00 0.11 0.17 0.19 0.39 1.34 Vermont 1.15 1.78 0.48 0.38 0.36 0.88 5.04 Virgin Islands 24.55 0.00 9.88 0.00 7.72 0.00 42.15 Virginia 0.07 0.00 0.06 0.99 0.03 0.10 1.24 Washington 0.75 0.00 0.34 0.53 0.05 0.17 1.85 West Virginia 2.03 2.47 0.09 1.59 0.05 0.29 6.51 Wisconsin 0.51 0.00 0.31 0.03 0.25 0.54 1.64 Wyoming 3.65 2.63 1.24 1.64 0.36 1.67 11.19 Total $0.48 $0.10 $0.22 $0.27 $0.08 $0.18 $1.34 1 Includes only hold harmless payments to non-rural carriers. High Cost Support1 Interstate Interstate Support Notes: Figures may not add due to rounding. Support payments do not include quarterly true-ups. Common Line Access Switching Loop Model Support Table
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr03-7.pdf
  • 52.85 53.12 52.95 52.63 52.29 53.66 53.10 54.06 53.98 Monthly Charge for Flat-rate Service $49.40 $49.36 $51.49 $51.24 $51.21 $51.05 $51.09 $50.92 $50.46 $51.13 $49.25 $49.06 $49.54 $49.26 Subscriber Line Charges 5.68 5.68 5.55 5.52 6.02 6.16 6.17 6.10 6.61 6.93 7.70 7.87 7.47 7.11 Extra for Touch-tone 3.29 2.65 2.32 2.29 2.14 1.40 1.28 1.15 0.73 0.63 0.61 0.53 0.51 0.38 Taxes, including 911 and Other Charges 7.44 7.49 7.75 7.95 7.98 7.95 8.12 8.09 8.08 8.68 7.99 8.11 9.44 9.17 Total Monthly Charge for Flat-rate Service 65.81 65.19 67.11 66.99 67.36 66.56 66.66 66.26 65.87 67.36 65.55 65.58 66.96 65.44 Number of Sample Cities with Flat-rate Service 53 56 54 54 54 53 53 53 53 54 54 54
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr04-1.pdf
  • Michigan 1,211,379 NA 5.60 204 319 400 534 Minnesota 443,739 NA 2.05 75 117 147 196 Mississippi * 27,141 0.13 5 7 9 12 Missouri 279,342 NA 1.29 47 74 92 123 Montana * 18,989 0.09 3 5 6 9 Nebraska 159,617 NA 0.74 27 42 53 70 Nevada 142,826 NA 0.66 24 38 47 63 New Hampshire 109,610 NA 0.51 18 29 36 48 New Jersey 396,865 NA 1.83 67 105 131 175 New Mexico * 13,062 0.06 2 4 4 6 New York 3,259,221 NA 15.06 548 859 1,077 1,437 North Carolina 328,715 NA 1.52 55 87 109 145 North Dakota * 43,950 0.21 8 12 15 20 N. Mariana Islands NA NA NA NA NA NA NA Ohio
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr04-11.pdf
  • Communications GA (288) (210) (78) 27.08 BellSouth - Georgia GA (42,713) (42,915) 202 (0.47) Verizon - Hawaii HI 3,641 3,673 (32) (0.88) Verizon - NW - Idaho ID 3,256 3,278 (23) (0.71) Qwest - Idaho South ID (377) (305) (80) 21.22 Qwest - Idaho North ID 130 154 (24) (18.46) Verizon - North - Contel Illinois IL 1,770 1,779 (9) (0.51) Verizon - South - Illinois IL 56 56 (1) (1.79) Verizon - North - Illinois IL 6,182 7,287 (1,105) (17.87) SBC - Ameritech - Illinois Bell IL 94,980 95,173 (193) (0.20) Verizon - North - Contel/Indiana IN 2,557 2,582 (25) (0.98) Verizon - North - Indiana IN 12,103 12,169 (66) (0.55) SBC - Ameritech - Indiana Bell IN 57,153 57,360
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr04-3.pdf
  • -4.19 -2.36 -1.87 -15.68 Georgia 0.29 -3.79 4.23 -11.62 Guam -11.11 -2.02 -9.27 -100.00 Hawaii 0.95 -2.10 3.12 53.42 Idaho 0.73 -2.72 3.55 2.96 Illinois -5.08 -0.30 -4.80 -3.32 Indiana 0.96 -2.07 3.10 14.05 Iowa 0.56 -2.62 3.27 13.46 Kansas -3.79 -5.64 1.96 11.56 Kentucky 4.85 -2.10 7.10 -4.31 Louisiana 2.03 -2.92 5.10 1.39 Maine -2.77 -0.84 -1.95 -19.34 Maryland 0.51 -2.45 3.03 4.64 Massachusetts -0.59 -5.01 4.66 -6.68 Michigan -4.36 2.11 -6.34 0.64 Minnesota 0.44 -4.76 5.46 -5.28 Mississippi 2.99 -2.25 5.37 2.94 Missouri -6.52 -3.08 -3.55 -2.17 Montana 1.29 -2.20 3.56 1.08 Nebraska -0.92 -4.70 3.97 9.03 Nevada 0.07 -0.21 0.28 -7.60 New Hampshire -5.90 -4.97 -0.98 5.90 New Jersey -0.97 -4.26 3.44 0.00 New Mexico 2.32 -1.38 3.75
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr04-4.pdf
  • 24.56 13,796,004 10.33 North Dakota 104,225 4,476,366 42.95 3,638,208 34.91 838,158 8.04 Northern Mariana Is. 11,251 1,249,977 111.10 1,153,276 102.50 96,701 8.59 Ohio 1,838,285 58,096,726 31.60 37,418,971 20.36 20,677,755 11.25 Oklahoma 624,548 36,705,541 58.77 21,320,857 34.14 15,384,684 24.63 Oregon 554,071 13,947,679 25.17 8,685,521 15.68 5,262,158 9.50 Pennsylvania 1,816,747 85,357,896 46.98 60,640,698 33.38 24,717,198 13.61 Puerto Rico 596,502 1,553,836 2.60 306,485 0.51 1,247,351 2.09 Rhode Island 159,205 9,902,576 62.20 6,688,734 42.01 3,213,842 20.19 South Carolina 694,584 68,221,787 98.22 39,275,410 56.55 28,946,377 41.67 South Dakota 128,039 2,866,358 22.39 1,646,764 12.86 1,219,593 9.53 Tennessee 928,000 23,880,306 25.73 14,995,784 16.16 8,884,522 9.57 Texas 4,259,823 264,717,245 62.14 177,084,287 41.57 87,632,958 20.57 Utah 489,072 7,471,621 15.28 5,762,070 11.78 1,709,551 3.50 Vermont 99,978 1,668,603 16.69 1,075,474 10.76 593,129
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr04-6.pdf
  • 2.9%* Georgia 1991 3.43 69.1% 81.6% 86.0% 12.5% * 4.4% 85.9% 90.4% 94.8% 4.5% * 4.4%* Hawaii 1987 0.00 76.1% 89.9% 93.9% 13.8% * 4.0% 94.0% 94.9% 97.8% 0.9% 2.9% Idaho 1987 3.48 78.4% 87.9% 88.2% 9.4% * 0.3% 90.6% 95.0% 95.5% 4.4% * 0.5% Illinois 1998 1.65 87.8% 83.2% 80.0% -4.6% -3.2% 95.6% 93.5% 92.3% -2.0% -1.3% Indiana 1998 0.51 80.4% 91.6% 87.5% 11.2% * -4.2% 92.0% 94.3% 94.1% 2.2% -0.2% Iowa 1998 0.03 89.7% 87.7% 93.2% -2.0% 5.4% 95.8% 96.1% 96.7% 0.3% 0.7% Kansas 1998 3.50 86.5% 87.0% 89.1% 0.4% 2.1% 94.5% 94.9% 96.0% 0.4% 1.1% Kentucky 1998 3.48 72.1% 87.7% 84.7% 15.6% * -3.0% 87.1% 93.1% 94.2% 6.0% * 1.1% Louisiana 1998 0.00 80.9% 81.7% 82.8% 0.8% 1.1%
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr04-7.pdf
  • subject to rate-of-return regulation. 7 - 27 2002 Minutes of Use Carrier (Millions) Common Line per Company Originating Access CCL CCL Local Minute** Originating Terminating Switching ALLTEL - Nebraska 0.00 0.00 0.79 0.33 2.29 372 369 741 BellSouth 0.00 0.00 0.36 0.24 1.23 23,475 55,742 64,411 CenturyTel # 0.01 0.00 0.43 0.28 1.46 815 2,228 3,061 Cincinnati Bell 0.00 0.00 0.51 0.28 1.61 865 2,141 3,008 Citizens 0.04 0.00 0.61 0.47 2.26 2,245 4,035 6,282 Iowa Telecom 0.00 0.00 1.39 0.62 4.10 390 339 730 Qwest 0.00 0.00 0.57 0.16 1.51 18,088 33,606 51,941 SBC 0.00 0.00 0.41 0.19 1.23 63,965 66,731 132,324 Sprint 0.00 0.00 0.60 0.14 1.51 5,825 19,008 24,880 Valor 0.00 0.00 0.79 0.41 2.45 332 1,016 1,348
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr98-7.pdf
  • June Percentage (in airline miles, 1984 1998 Change 1984 1998 Change rate center to rate center) 1 - 10Day $0.96 $1.40 45.8% $0.96 $1.82 89.3% Evening 0.57 0.80 40.4 0.57 1.82 218.9 Night & Weekend 0.38 0.65 71.1 0.38 1.82 378.3 11 - 22Day 1.28 $1.40 9.4 1.28 1.82 42.0 Evening 0.76 0.80 5.3 0.76 1.82 139.1 Night & Weekend 0.51 0.65 27.5 0.51 1.82 256.4 23 - 55Day 1.60 $1.40 -12.5 1.60 1.82 13.6 Evening 0.96 0.80 -16.7 0.96 1.82 89.3 Night & Weekend 0.64 0.65 1.6 0.64 1.82 184.0 56 - 124Day 2.05 $1.40 -31.7 2.05 1.82 -11.3 Evening 1.22 0.80 -34.4 1.22 1.82 49.0 Night & Weekend 0.82 0.65 -20.7 0.82 1.82 121.6 125 - 292Day 2.14 $1.40
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrd99-7.pdf
  • July Percentage (in airline miles, 1984 1999 Change 1984 1999 Change rate center to rate center) 1 - 10Day $0.96 $1.40 45.8% $0.96 $1.82 89.3% Evening 0.57 0.80 40.4 0.57 1.82 218.9 Night & Weekend 0.38 0.65 71.1 0.38 1.82 378.3 11 - 22Day 1.28 $1.40 9.4 1.28 1.82 42.0 Evening 0.76 0.80 5.3 0.76 1.82 139.1 Night & Weekend 0.51 0.65 27.5 0.51 1.82 256.4 23 - 55Day 1.60 $1.40 -12.5 1.60 1.82 13.6 Evening 0.96 0.80 -16.7 0.96 1.82 89.3 Night & Weekend 0.64 0.65 1.6 0.64 1.82 184.0 56 - 124Day 2.05 $1.40 -31.7 2.05 1.82 -11.3 Evening 1.22 0.80 -34.4 1.22 1.82 49.0 Night & Weekend 0.82 0.65 -20.7 0.82 1.82 121.6 125 - 292Day 2.14 $1.40
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrs01-0.pdf
  • Montana 46,391 7.18 8,376 1.30 38,014 5.88 Nebraska 23,621 1.96 13,964 1.16 9,657 0.80 Nevada 14,680 0.93 20,021 1.27 -5,341 -0.34 New Hampshire 8,544 0.81 14,283 1.36 -5,739 -0.55 New Jersey 3,504 0.04 91,976 1.14 -88,472 -1.09 New Mexico 37,701 3.29 14,957 1.31 22,744 1.99 New York 53,021 0.34 159,144 1.03 -106,123 -0.69 North Carolina 34,304 0.56 65,191 1.07 -30,887 -0.51 North Dakota 24,969 4.98 6,150 1.23 18,819 3.75 Northern Mariana Islands 3,310 11.06 250 0.84 3,060 10.22 Ohio 19,587 0.23 76,233 0.91 -56,646 -0.67 Oklahoma 65,942 2.63 24,417 0.98 41,525 1.66 Oregon 46,888 1.84 28,937 1.13 17,951 0.70 Pennsylvania 28,812 0.28 92,121 0.91 -63,309 -0.62 Puerto Rico 143,591 9.24 12,891 0.83 130,701 8.41 Rhode Island 25 0.00 9,839 1.21 -9,814
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrs02-0.pdf
  • 1,118 1.64 1,068 4 1,171 65 Mississippi 837 1.23 799 3 877 49 Missouri 1,373 2.02 1,311 4 1,438 80 Montana 206 0.30 197 1 216 12 Nebraska 462 0.68 441 1 484 27 Nevada 402 0.59 384 1 421 23 New Hampshire 274 0.40 261 1 286 16 New Jersey 1,800 2.64 1,718 6 1,884 104 New Mexico 344 0.51 329 1 360 20 New York 5,629 8.26 5,373 18 5,893 326 North Carolina 2,077 3.05 1,983 7 2,174 120 North Dakota 159 0.23 152 1 166 9 N. Mariana Islands NA NA NA NA NA NA Ohio 2,546 3.74 2,430 8 2,665 147 Oklahoma 718 1.05 685 2 752 42 Oregon 507 0.74 484 2 531 29 Pennsylvania 2,454
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/SOCC/00socc.pdf
  • 2,076.3 0.204TX Utah 265.7 6.64 259.1 36.4 222.6 96.7 38.9 85.2 220.8 1.894UT Vermont 82.7 1.18 81.5 12.9 68.6 27.9 19.9 20.9 68.6 VT Virginia 1,170.4 21.47 1,148.9 313.3 835.6 395.0 123.7 315.7 834.4 1.131VA Washington 940.7 16.75 923.9 235.5 688.4 317.3 108.5 258.4 684.1 4.234WA West Virginia 217.6 1.93 215.7 46.7 169.0 95.4 31.1 42.2 168.7 0.279WV Wisconsin 475.8 0.51 475.3 91.0 384.3 169.1 71.0 144.2 384.2 0.185WI Wyoming 76.0 6.27 69.7 6.5 63.2 25.1 15.2 22.6 62.8 0.402WY Puerto Rico 388.7 388.7 89.1 299.6 213.0 78.2 8.5 299.6 PR Unclassified 132 Statistics of Communications Common Carriers Table 2.13 - Revenues of Reporting Incumbent Local Exchange Carriers for the Year Ended December 31, 2000 -- Continued Toll Network Service Revenues
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/SOCC/01socc.pdf
  • 66.2 72.9 11.37 7.91 26.17 45.45 27.4MA Michigan 221.5 187.1 34.4 15.2 19.2 3.01 1.92 0.83 5.76 13.5MI Minnesota 153.4 74.1 79.2 57.2 22.1 11.28 1.71 0.72 13.71 8.4MN Mississippi 148.4 24.8 123.6 118.0 5.7 (0.50) (0.21) 0.46 (0.26) 5.9MS Missouri 479.6 363.8 115.8 84.1 31.7 11.52 3.51 5.02 20.05 11.6MO Montana 10.4 9.4 1.0 (0.3) 1.3 0.03 (0.17) (0.37) (0.51) 1.8MT Nebraska 131.3 49.5 81.8 60.4 21.4 8.13 3.37 6.21 17.71 3.7NE Nevada 122.2 77.0 45.2 31.6 13.6 2.57 2.17 0.67 5.40 8.2NV New Hampshire 38.9 17.7 21.2 8.4 12.8 3.43 1.49 3.06 7.98 4.8NH New Jersey 366.9 224.3 142.6 55.9 86.7 25.34 8.39 19.28 53.01 33.7NJ New Mexico 60.2 33.7 26.5 20.3 6.2 1.97 0.20 (0.07) 2.10 4.1NM New
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/SOCC/02socc.pdf
  • 1.10 0.90 0.70 0.60 0.38 0.38 0.38 0.38 0.38 Egypt 9/ 1.80 1.70 1.60 1.50 1.40 1.40 1.30 1.30 1.10 0.70 0.46 0.46 0.46 El Salvador 9/ 1.40 1.30 1.25 1.20 1.20 1.10 0.88 0.77 0.60 0.48 0.38 0.38 0.38 France 9/ 1.43 0.96 0.97 0.62 0.54 0.35 0.26 0.21 0.21 0.19 0.19 0.20 0.21 Germany 9/ 1.43 1.10 0.83 0.51 0.39 0.23 0.20 0.21 0.21 0.19 0.19 0.20 0.21 Greece 9/ 2.19 1.66 1.55 1.41 1.26 1.01 0.86 0.55 0.30 0.26 0.25 0.26 0.27 Guatemala 9/ 1.50 1.40 1.30 1.20 1.18 1.00 0.90 0.77 0.64 0.51 0.38 0.38 0.38 Haiti 1.40 1.35 1.30 1.25 1.20 1.20 1.20 1.20 1.00 0.92 0.70 0.60 0.46 Hong Kong 9/ 1.90 1.60 1.20 1.00
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/SOCC/03socc.pdf
  • 1.40 1.01 0.72 $0.40 $0.36 $0.36 Colombia 1.55 1.50 1.40 1.30 1.25 1.00 0.80 0.65 0.55 0.38 Dominican Republic 1.36 1.29 1.30 1.10 0.90 0.70 0.60 0.38 0.38 Egypt 1.70 1.60 1.50 1.40 1.40 1.30 1.30 1.10 0.70 El Salvador 1.30 1.25 1.20 1.20 1.10 0.88 0.77 0.60 0.48 0.38 France 0.96 0.97 0.62 0.54 0.35 0.26 Germany 1.10 0.83 0.51 0.39 0.23 0.20 Greece 1.66 1.55 1.41 1.26 1.01 0.86 0.55 0.30 Guatemala 1.40 1.30 1.20 1.18 1.00 0.90 0.77 0.64 0.51 Haiti 1.35 1.30 1.25 1.20 1.20 1.20 1.20 1.00 0.92 0.70 0.60 0.46 Hong Kong 1.60 1.20 1.00 1.00 0.94 0.79 0.72 India 2.00 1.90 1.80 1.80 1.60 1.42 1.28 1.08 0.85 0.68 0.46 0.46 Israel 2.28 2.16
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/SOCC/95socc.pdf
  • 0.33 (1.10) 50.9 FL GEORGIA 196.2 72.6 123.7 111.9 11.7 (0.49) 0.19 (0.36) (0.66) 12.4 GA HAWAII 110.6 62.5 48.2 42.6 5.6 0.48 (0.10) 0.27 0.65 4.9 HI IDAHO 5.7 9.5 (3.8) (3.7) (0.1) (1.99) (1.23) (0.64) (3.85) 3.8 ID ILLINOIS 388.1 199.7 188.4 155.9 32.5 (0.92) 0.87 0.76 0.71 31.8 IL INDIANA 257.5 124.4 133.1 118.3 14.8 1.14 (0.12) 0.51 1.54 13.3 IN IOWA 25.2 23.5 1.8 2.5 (0.8) (2.49) (2.10) (2.07) (6.65) 5.9 IA KANSAS 54.2 32.5 21.7 15.9 5.9 0.11 0.07 0.09 0.26 5.6 KS KENTUCKY 105.3 44.3 61.1 54.5 6.6 0.47 (0.45) 0.12 0.14 6.4 KY LOUISIANA 143.9 37.4 106.5 100.9 5.6 (0.33) (0.01) (0.10) (0.44) 6.0 LA MAINE 23.0 3.4 19.5 15.1 4.4 0.20 (0.06) 0.00
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/SOCC/96socc.pdf
  • OF COMMUNICATIONS COMMON CARRIERS TABLE 5.4-AT&T RATES FOR LONG DISTANCE MESSAGE TELECOMMUNICATIONS SERVICE MAINLAND UNITED STATES-CANADA DIAL STATION STANDARD ECONOMY EACH EACH RATE INITIAL ADDITIONAL INITIAL ADDITIONAL MILEAGE MINUTE MINUTE MINUTE MINUTE RES. BUS. RES. BUS. RES. BUS. RES. BUS. 1-18 $0.34 $0.27 $0.34 $0.27 $0.30 $0.27 $0.30 $0.27 19-80 0.37 0.43 0.37 0.43 0.30 0.43 0.30 0.43 81-140 0.43 0.51 0.43 0.51 0.31 0.51 0.31 0.51 141-220 0.46 0.53 0.46 0.53 0.33 0.53 0.33 0.53 221-345 0.49 0.66 0.49 0.66 0.33 0.66 0.33 0.66 346-630 0.54 0.74 0.54 0.74 0.37 0.74 0.37 0.74 631-1200 0.54 0.87 0.54 0.87 0.37 0.87 0.37 0.87 1201-1610 0.57 0.93 0.57 0.93 0.39 0.93 0.39 0.93 1611-4000 0.61 0.97 0.61 0.97 0.41 0.97 0.41 0.97
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/SOCC/97socc.pdf
  • SPECIAL T O T A L AND LINE SENSITIVE INTEREXCHANGE ALL REPORTING COS. $9,299.3 $44.7 $9,229.7$8,931.8 $297.9 $12.0 $22.6 $0.0 $34.7 $263.3 BELL OPERATING COS. 7,214.8 35.3 7,179.5 6,926.6 253.0 11.6 22.0 33.6 219.4 ALL OTHER COS. 2,084.5 9.4 2,050.2 2,005.2 44.9 0.3 0.7 0.0 1.0 43.9 ALABAMA 88.8 4.599 84.2 82.4 1.78 1.78 AL ARIZONA 47.7 0.057 47.6 47.1 0.51 0.51 AZ ARKANSAS 100.8 (0.283) 101.1 100.3 0.78 0.78 AR CALIFORNIA 1,605.7 3.015 1,602.7 1,601.1 1.60 1.60 CA COLORADO 117.9 0.004 117.9 118.0 (0.09) (0.09)CO CONNECTICUT 219.9 219.9 210.4 9.52 9.52 CT DELAWARE 30.7 30.7 13.7 17.03 2.2 4.2 6.5 10.56 DE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA 4.0 4.0 4.00 0.5 0.9 1.3 2.68 DC FLORIDA 242.2 0.137 242.1 241.3 0.72 0.72
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/SOCC/98SOCC.PDF
  • 4.0 6.1 12.89 MD MASSACHUSETTS 362.7 362.7 362.8 (0.03) (0.03)MA MICHIGAN 773.4 0.058 773.4 773.4 (0.01) (0.01)MI MINNESOTA 40.0 0.187 39.8 38.9 0.91 0.91 MN MISSISSIPPI 83.7 83.7 83.3 0.44 0.44 MS MISSOURI 222.7 222.7 200.6 22.10 22.10 MO MONTANA 27.4 0.018 27.4 27.3 0.07 0.07 MT NEBRASKA 44.6 0.382 44.2 42.2 2.03 2.03 NE NEVADA 15.8 0.001 15.8 16.3 (0.51) (0.51)NV NEW HAMPSHIRE 71.0 71.0 71.0 (0.01) (0.01)NH NEW JERSEY 535.3 535.3 520.2 15.08 2.0 3.8 5.8 9.29 NJ NEW MEXICO 41.4 0.001 41.4 41.4 0.03 0.03 NM NEW YORK 244.4 244.4 230.3 14.16 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.1 14.05 NY NORTH CAROLINA 96.9 96.9 95.5 1.44 1.44 NC NORTH DAKOTA 30.0 0.672 29.3 26.5 2.81 2.81 ND OHIO 209.9 0.120
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/SOCC/99socc.pdf
  • 7.8 0.86 0.06 0.27 1.19 6.6ME Maryland 233.4 113.5 119.9 70.4 49.5 7.24 6.60 5.98 19.82 29.7MD Massachusetts 182.8 104.3 78.5 27.1 51.4 6.32 2.87 5.97 15.16 36.3MA Michigan 272.4 217.0 55.4 37.1 18.3 (0.55) (0.16) 0.21 (0.49) 18.8 MI Minnesota 106.8 67.4 39.4 27.9 11.4 1.14 0.29 0.52 1.95 9.5MN Mississippi 60.2 29.8 30.3 22.7 7.7 0.27 0.11 0.13 0.51 7.2MS Missouri 364.3 273.2 91.1 78.3 12.7 (0.86) (0.32) 0.08 (1.10) 13.8MO Montana 8.3 10.5 (2.2) (2.2) 0.0 (1.07) (0.42) (0.46) (1.95) 2.0MT Nebraska 129.9 62.8 67.2 48.4 18.8 5.49 3.14 5.14 13.77 5.0NE Nevada 120.3 70.9 49.4 39.6 9.8 0.03 0.15 0.05 0.23 9.5NV New Hampshire 27.9 13.7 14.2 5.4 8.8 0.66 0.21 0.33 1.20 7.6NH New Jersey 337.9
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/SOCC/prelim02socc.pdf
  • 1.10 0.90 0.70 0.60 0.38 0.38 0.38 0.38 0.38 Egypt 10/ 1.80 1.70 1.60 1.50 1.40 1.40 1.30 1.30 1.10 0.70 0.46 0.46 0.46 El Salvador 10/ 1.40 1.30 1.25 1.20 1.20 1.10 0.88 0.77 0.60 0.48 0.38 0.38 0.38 France 10/ 1.43 0.96 0.97 0.62 0.54 0.35 0.26 0.21 0.21 0.19 0.19 0.20 0.21 Germany 10/ 1.43 1.10 0.83 0.51 0.39 0.23 0.20 0.21 0.21 0.19 0.19 0.20 0.21 Greece 10/ 2.19 1.66 1.55 1.41 1.26 1.01 0.86 0.55 0.30 0.26 0.25 0.26 0.27 Guatemala 10/ 1.50 1.40 1.30 1.20 1.18 1.00 0.90 0.77 0.64 0.51 0.38 0.38 0.38 Haiti 1.40 1.35 1.30 1.25 1.20 1.20 1.20 1.20 1.00 0.92 0.70 0.60 0.46 Hong Kong 10/ 1.90 1.60 1.20 1.00
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/International/Orders/1999/da992067.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/International/Orders/1999/da992067.txt
  • 5. Although the Commission does not routinely grant extensions of time, we find that a brief extension in this instance is warranted in the interest of developing a complete record in this proceeding. 6. This action is taken pursuant to authority found in Section 4 (i) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. � 154(i), and Sections 0.51, 0.261, and 1.46 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � � 0.51, 0.261 and 1.46. 7. Accordingly, EchoStar Satellite Corporation's Motion for Extension of Time filed October 1, 1999 IS GRANTED. EchoStar Satellite Corporation shall submit the information requested by the International Bureau in its September 23, 1999 letter on or before October 7, 1999. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Thomas S.
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/International/Orders/1999/da992555.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/International/Orders/1999/da992555.txt
  • cause to waive the section 214 benchmarks condition on the U.S.-Chile route. Therefore, we deny the request for waiver. III. ORDERING CLAUSES Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to Sections 1, 2, 4(i), 4 (j), 5(c), 201, 214 and 303(r) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151, 152, 154(i), 155(c), 201, 214 and 303(r), and Sections 0.51, 0.261, 1.3, 1.80, 63.10 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.51, 0.261, 1.3, 1.80, 63.10, that TLD's petition for waiver of the Section 214 Settlement Rate Condition in the U.S.-Chile route IS DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this order is effective upon release. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Rebecca Arbogast Chief, Telecommunications Division International Bureau Telef�nica Larga Distancia de Puerto
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/International/Orders/2000/da000094.doc
  • earth stations there to access a U.S. authorized and Loral-owned satellite. . We find it is in the public interest to grant Loral an extension of time in which to file comments on the above captioned application. Therefore, we extend the date to file comments on W4's application until January 30, 2000. . This action is taken pursuant to Sections 0.51, 0.261, 1.46 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � � 0.51, 0.261, 1.46. . Accordingly, Loral's Request for Extension of Time is GRANTED and the deadline for filing comments on the above captioned application is EXTENDED from January 8, 2000, until January 30, 2000. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Thomas S. Tycz Chief, Satellite and Radiocommication Division, International Bureau Federal Communications Commission
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/International/Orders/2000/da000663.doc
  • all U.S.-licensed satellites, as conditioned, will be consistent with the Commission's policies regarding U.S. access to space stations licensed by foreign administrations. We therefore grant the earth station applications to the extent indicated in this Order. V. ORDERING CLAUSES Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to Section 309(a) of the Communications Act, as amended, 47 U.S.C. � 309(a), and Sections 0.51 and 0.261 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.51, 0.261, Williams Communications, Inc. IS GRANTED authority to modify its transmit/receive earth station at Perris, California, Call Sign E950202, as specified in Application No. SES-MOD-19980121-00104 as revised, to the extent specified in this Order, subject to the conditions set forth in this Order. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/International/Public_Notices/1999/pnin9052.pdf
  • Accordingly, effective today, ex parte presentations in this proceeding are subject to the disclosure requirements set forth in Section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules. 47 C.F.R. � 1.1206. This action is taken pursuant to authority found in Sections 4(i) and 303 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 154 (i) and 303; and pursuant to Sections 0.51, 0.241, 0.261 and 1.1200(a) of the Commission's Rules. See 47 C.F.R. �� 0.51, 0.241, 0.261 and 1.1200(a). Copies of the referenced applications and subsequent filings will be available for public inspection in the International Reference Center, Room 102, 2000 M St. N.W., Washington, D.C. and from ITS Duplicating Services at 202-857-3800. For further information, contact Kathleen Campbell at 202-418-0753 or
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/International/Public_Notices/1999/pnin9060.pdf
  • Accordingly, effective today, ex parte presentations in this proceeding are subject to the disclosure requirements set forth in Section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules. 47 C.F.R. � 1.1206. This action is taken pursuant to authority found in Sections 4(i) and 303 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 154 (i) and 303; and pursuant to Sections 0.51, 0.241, 0.261 and 1.1200(a) of the Commission's Rules. See 47 C.F.R. �� 0.51, 0.241, 0.261 and 1.1200(a). Copies of the referenced applications and subsequent filings will be available for public inspection in the International Reference Center, Room 102, 2000 M St. N.W., Washington, D.C. and from ITS Duplicating Services at 202-857-3800. For further information, please contact: Kim Baum at (202)
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/International/Public_Notices/2000/da000192.pdf
  • February 2, 2000, ex parte presentations relating to this proceeding are subject to the disclosure requirements set forth in Section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules. [47 C.F.R. � 1.1206.] This action is taken pursuant to the authority in Section 4(i) and 303 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 154(i) and 303 and pursuant to Section 0.51, 0.261, and 1.1200(a) of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.51, 0.261, and 1.1200(a). By the Chief, International Bureau Page 8 of 8
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/International/Public_Notices/2000/da002249.doc
  • effective October 2, 2000, ex parte presentations relating to this proceeding are subject to the disclosure requirements set forth in Section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules. 47 C.F.R. �� 1.1206. This action is taken pursuant to authority found in Sections 4(i) and 303 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 154(i), 303, and pursuant to Sections 0.51, 0.261, and 1.1200(a) of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.51, 0.261, 1.1200(a), For further information, contact Steven Spaeth, International Bureau, (202) 418-1539. - FCC - $ $ R W `` � � � �����PNG > �!�R>^��S�S߿�"K�k������er4 �J�dM�O�O � �,I TV��5 0�z̪�� ��� %�o� �� � �a�% Tf(c) U~��Uy�Ӛ�o=�c� {�YAD ���Zv�}�YAD e/�,�-�%E9 ^1�J 2�� bʆPh=f 8H�]}��`��2@ ���'����X�t�p�O � ��$��>��� -�m�``�Q(q
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/OPP/working_papers/oppwp35.pdf
  • those trades. The experimental sessions typically had different subjects playing the role of a given buyer. The average buyer bargaining power is simply the average of these "averages." Figures 3 - 5 show the average buyer's bargaining power for the last four trading periods for each concentration treatment. 1 2 3 4 DBS UNCAP noMFN MFN 0.44 0.41 0.49 0.53 0.51 0.50 0.41 0.42 0.43 0.54 0.30 0.29 0.32 0.39 0.18 0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 Buyer Figure 3: Buyer Average Bargaining Power (Periods 5-8) Low/High Concentration Treatment Treatment 30 1 2 3 4 DBS UNCAP noMFN MFN 0.51 0.50 0.52 0.48 0.65 0.42 0.36 0.47 0.37 0.47 0.33 0.31 0.31 0.37 0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Orders/2001/da012482.pdf
  • Capital's holdings in GE Americom and Columbia Communications Corporation to SES Global, amend all pending applications to reflect the new ownership structure approved in this Supplemental Order. 15. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that with respect to all other ordering provisions, the October 2, 2001 Order and Authorization remains effective. 16. This action is taken under delegated authority pursuant to Sections 0.51, 0.261, 0.131, 0.331 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.51, 0.261, 0.131, 0.331, and SHALL BE EFFECTIVE upon release. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Donald Abelson Chief, International Bureau Thomas J. Sugrue Chief, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireline_Competition/Orders/2002/fcc02118.pdf
  • Trouble Report Rate MR-2-02-2100 Network Trouble Report Rate � Loop 0.92 0.26 0.77 0.29 0.57 0.24 0.67 0.2 0.58 0.25 MR-2-03-2100 Network Trouble Report Rate � Central Office 0.14 0.15 0.06 0.04 0.04 0.03 0.05 0.06 0.06 0.1 MR-2-04-2100 % Subsequent Reports 11.59 9.64 10.31 0 11.71 1.92 3.92 2.9 MR-2-05-2100 % CPE/TOK/FOK Trouble Report Rate 0.82 0.28 0.65 0.31 0.51 0.15 0.26 0.26 MR-3 � Missed Repair Appointments MR-3-01-2110 % Missed Repair Appointment � Loop Bus. 16.4 9.76 10.75 8 10.65 13.95 13.94 5.56 16.72 4.76 MR-3-01-2120 % Missed Repair Appointment � Loop Res. 9.27 0 7.58 0 8.44 0 8.24 0 8.01 0 a,b,c,d,e MR-3-02-2110 % Missed Repair Appointment � Central Office Bus. 1.81 3.85 0 0 2.22 0
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-12-2A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-12-2A1.pdf
  • Number of FM stations in contour -0.000 (0.01) -0.001 (0.02) 0.002 (0.05) Number of commercial TV stations 0.027 (0.30) 0.030 (0.33) 0.033 (0.36) Number of digital radio stations in market 0.015 (1.11) 0.020 (1.46) 0.016 (1.18) Number of newspapers in market -0.232 (2.25)* -0.249 (2.40)* -0.228 (2.22)* Population 18+ -0.000 (1.16) -0.000 (0.97) -0.000 (0.90) Retail expenditures in market -0.000 (0.51) 0.000 (0.08) -0.000 (0.23) Per capita income in market -0.000 (1.70) -0.000 (2.24)* -0.000 (2.14)* 2007-2009 time effect -0.301 (3.64)** -0.304 (3.64)** -0.299 (3.64)** Constant -0.058 (0.86) -0.059 (0.87) -0.051 (0.76) * - estimated regression coefficient is different from zero at the 95 percent level of confidence. ** - estimated regression coefficient is different from zero at the 99 percent
• http://www.fcc.gov/ib/pd/pf/TABALL02.pdf
  • 7,151 0.83 0.18 0.27 3.29 1 16 16 13 12Sweden 4,887 29,207 32 34,126 2,080 0.17 0.14 0.18 0.49 6 17 12 9 11Brazil 5,724 19,547 6,570 31,841 42,929 0.22 0.11 0.09 0.24 7 18 15 15 15Taiwan 2,201 27,413 1 29,615 14,811 0.08 0.06 0.12 0.29 1 19 14 11 8France 13,738 5,778 7,561 27,077 6,581 1.03 0.38 0.29 0.51 7 20 19 26 20India 3,529 23,029 0 26,558 3,121 0.15 0.18 0.40 0.46 7 21 20 20 19Philippines 10,642 8,814 634 20,090 10,754 1.13 1.16 1.11 1.59 6 22 23 21 24Colombia 4,008 6,851 5,220 16,079 2,911 0.33 0.32 0.31 0.58 6 23 22 23 21Venezuela 3,086 5,886 3,717 12,689 20,365 0.32 0.22 0.38 0.70 8 24 21 22
• http://www.fcc.gov/ib/pd/pf/csreport.pdf
  • 35,134 1,677 45,492 29,283 0.24 0.57 0.65 0.73 1 5 5 5 5Germany 9,261 21,484 541 31,286 13,521 0.42 0.76 0.64 0.83 1 6 8 13 8Netherlands 1,831 20,687 30 22,548 17,721 0.09 0.34 0.58 0.56 8 7 7 6 7Australia 2,521 14,830 347 17,698 6,060 0.17 0.65 0.97 0.92 1 8 9 7 6France 5,346 8,390 2,010 15,746 4,474 0.51 1.67 0.95 0.99 7 9 11 10 10Hong Kong 1,313 9,767 264 11,344 4,229 0.13 0.26 0.42 0.52 7 10 10 8 9Korea, South 2,678 7,289 35 10,002 5,178 0.37 0.56 0.59 0.98 1 11 6 9 15Sweden 3,198 6,568 0 9,766 1,806 0.49 0.28 0.30 0.60 6 12 12 11 11Brazil 1,939 7,556 221 9,716 1,505 0.25 0.58 0.64
• http://www.fcc.gov/ib/pd/pf/csreport_2000.pdf
  • Others) + Others) + Others) CodeRank Rank Rank Rank Country Ckts Ckts Ckts Ckts Ckts Split Split Split Split 1 1 1 2 3United Kingdom 102,577 635,794 22,519 760,890 844,254 0.16 0.22 0.32 0.77 5 2 2 1 1Canada 80,874 278,591 55,673 415,138 436,238 0.24 0.66 1.02 1.12 7 3 4 4 4Japan 95,889 115,526 2,710 214,125 48,294 0.81 0.16 0.51 0.61 5 4 3 3 2Mexico 75,377 92,217 1,260 168,854 235,010 0.81 1.62 1.38 1.57 1 5 5 5 5Germany 11,315 92,373 541 104,229 14,904 0.12 0.37 0.76 0.63 1 6 6 8 13Netherlands 3,401 60,297 4,770 68,468 30,622 0.05 0.09 0.34 0.56 8 7 7 7 6Australia 11,444 43,052 1,291 55,787 5,407 0.26 0.10 0.63 0.97 7 8 10
• http://www.fcc.gov/ib/sand/agree/files/mex-bc/am.pdf
  • 4300 4400 4500 4600 4700. 4800 4900 5000. 5100- 5200 5300 -5400-- 5500 5600 5700 5800 5900 6000 6200 6400 6600 6800 7000 7200 7400 7600 7800 8000 8200 8400 8600 8800 9000 9200 9400 9600 9800 LOOOO Fe (&I 50% 1.43 1.33 1.23 1.15 1.07 1.00 0.94 0.88 0.83 0.79 01.75 0.71 0.67 0.64 0.61 0.58 0.55 0.53 - 0.51 0.48 - 0.46 0.45 0.43. --_ 0.41 - 0.40 .- s. 0.38 -. 0.37. '-. . . ._.. 0.36 0.34 0.33 0.32 0.30 . 0.28 . 0.27 0.25 0.24 0.23 0.22 0.21 0.20 0.19 0.18 0.17 . 0.17 0.16 0.15 0.15 0.14 0.14 ii-:3 . llj .- 0.x ir M/e.- Fuclofs given in lefms of hour wifh fespec: to 1
• http://www.fcc.gov/ib/sand/mniab/traffic/files/ITRND01.pdf
  • 2,511.0 1,395.9 0.97 0.69 0.28 0.56 0.38 19874,819.2 4,751.1 3,422.9 1,328.2 2,822.7 1,670.6 0.99 0.71 0.28 0.59 0.39 19885,679.4 5,806.3 4,039.1 1,767.2 3,228.2 1,906.3 1.02 0.71 0.31 0.59 0.41 19896,750.7 6,912.3 4,735.4 2,176.9 3,810.3 2,212.7 1.02 0.70 0.32 0.58 0.42 19908,029.7 8,059.0 5,297.4 2,761.6 4,340.9 2,426.3 1.00 0.66 0.34 0.56 0.42 19919,071.7 9,263.2 5,852.4 3,410.8 4,768.6 2,410.4 1.02 0.65 0.38 0.51 0.42 199210,293.8 10,382.5 6,007.7 4,374.8 5,369.7 2,481.2 1.01 0.58 0.42 0.46 0.44 199311,513.3 11,563.7 6,372.0 5,191.7 5,786.0 2,476.7 1.00 0.55 0.45 0.43 0.44 199413,615.6 12,542.9 7,009.7 5,533.2 6,384.9 2,501.8 0.92 0.51 0.41 0.39 0.40 199515,888.8 14,335.4 7,569.0 6,766.4 7,050.6 2,464.1 0.90 0.48 0.43 0.35 0.40 199619,325.1 14,597.8 8,252.3 6,345.5 8,293.2 2,450.9 0.76 0.43 0.33 0.30 0.32 199722,753.1 15,661.6 8,031.0 7,630.5
• http://www.fcc.gov/mb/databases/cdbs/index.html
  • FTP: [21]all-cdbs-files.zip HTTP: [22]all-cdbs-files.zip (114.45 MB) Individual CDBS Public Files sizes (zipped file sizes): am_ant_sys.zip [ [23]FTP | [24]HTTP ] (1.72 MB) am_augs.zip [ [25]FTP | [26]HTTP ] (0.44 MB) am_eng_data.zip [ [27]FTP | [28]HTTP ] (0.29 MB) am_towers.zip [ [29]FTP | [30]HTTP ] (1.02 MB) amcmnts.zip [ [31]FTP | [32]HTTP ] (0.01 MB) ant_make.zip [ [33]FTP | [34]HTTP ] (0.51 MB) ant_pattern.zip [ [35]FTP | [36]HTTP ] (5.99 MB) app_party.zip [ [37]FTP | [38]HTTP ] (13.58 MB) app_tracking.zip [ [39]FTP | [40]HTTP ] (4.14 MB) application.zip [ [41]FTP | [42]HTTP ] (18.53 MB) call_sign_history.zip [ [43]FTP | [44]HTTP ] (1.34 MB) dtv_agreement_group.zip [ [45]FTP | [46]HTTP ] (0.01 MB) dtv_allotment.zip [ [47]FTP | [48]HTTP ] (0.04 MB) dtv_channel_assignments.zip [ [49]FTP
• http://www.fcc.gov/mb/peer_review/prlpfm_rpt_economic_study.pdf
  • Number of FM stations in contour -0.000 (0.01) -0.001 (0.02) 0.002 (0.05) Number of commercial TV stations 0.027 (0.30) 0.030 (0.33) 0.033 (0.36) Number of digital radio stations in market 0.015 (1.11) 0.020 (1.46) 0.016 (1.18) Number of newspapers in market -0.232 (2.25)* -0.249 (2.40)* -0.228 (2.22)* Population 18+ -0.000 (1.16) -0.000 (0.97) -0.000 (0.90) Retail expenditures in market -0.000 (0.51) 0.000 (0.08) -0.000 (0.23) Per capita income in market -0.000 (1.70) -0.000 (2.24)* -0.000 (2.14)* 2007-2009 time effect -0.301 (3.64)** -0.304 (3.64)** -0.299 (3.64)** Constant -0.058 (0.86) -0.059 (0.87) -0.051 (0.76) * -estimated regression coefficient is different from zero at the 95 percent level of confidence. ** -estimated regression coefficient is different from zero at the 99 percent level of
• http://www.fcc.gov/mb/peer_review/prrespstudy4.pdf
  • PUB 1,009.02 ** 457.88 0.029 TBN -52.77 35.54 0.139 INS -14.14 74.54 0.850 TEL 19.41 33.53 0.563 AZT -75.46 83.46 0.367 TLF -93.70 ** 42.76 0.030 SHP -69.78 109.41 0.524 EDU 367.93 238.58 0.125 HSN -219.27 *** 80.40 0.007 HTV 345.67 *** 26.03 0.000 Additional Dummy Variables Used: Every Market (not shown in table) Number of Observations 6,703 Adj. R2 0.51 Key ownership variables are bolded. Robust standard errors adjusted for clustering at the market level. *** indicates significance at the 1 percent level. ** indicates significance at the 5 percent level. * indicates significance at the 10 percent level. 11 Table I.9R Analysis of Public Affairs Minutes Provided � Additional Regressions PA2: Controlled for Market PA3: Full Fixed Effects Variable
• http://www.fcc.gov/ownership/materials/already-released/consumer090002.pdf
  • 2.03 AC/Full Service (FS) 1 0.02 AC/NR 42 0.67 AC/Oldies (O) 5 0.09 AC/SAC 8 0.13 AOR 565 10.32 AOR 375 5.94 AOR/AC 5 0.09 AOR/AC 3 0.05 Black (B) 281 5.13 AOR/NR 200 3.17 B/AC 13 0.24 AOR/P 80 1.27 B/Gospel (G) 4 0.07 B 236 3.74 B/O 3 0.05 B/AC 107 1.69 B/Talk (T) 4 0.07 B/G 32 0.51 Big Band/Nostalgia (BB) 213 3.89 B/O 26 0.41 BB/EZ 7 0.13 B/T 6 0.1 BB/FS 5 0.09 BB 315 4.99 BB/O 1 0.02 BB/EZ 3 0.05 Country (C) 772 14.1 BB/REL 1 0.02 C/FS 20 0.37 BB/T 1 0.02 CHR 488 8.91 C 904 14.32 CHR/AC 15 0.27 C/FS 14 0.22 CHR/Spanish (SP) 3 0.05 CHR 410 6.49 CHR/Urban (U)
• http://www.fcc.gov/ownership/materials/already-released/survivor090002.pdf
  • Ad Volume Total Ad Volume as Percentage of GDP Total Video Ad Volume as Percentage of GDP Total Broadcast Ad Volume as Percentage of GDP Total Cable Ad Volume as Percentage of GDP 1975 1,635,200 27,900 5,263 5,263 0 1.71 0.32 0.32 0 1980 2,795,600 53,570 11,488 11,416 72 1.92 0.41 0.41 0.0026 1985 4,213,000 94,900 21,287 20,298 989 2.25 0.51 0.48 0.0235 1990 5,803,200 129,968 29,247 26,616 2,631 2.24 0.50 0.46 0.0453 1991 5,986,200 128,352 28,606 25,461 3,145 2.14 0.48 0.43 0.0525 1992 6,318,900 133,750 31,079 27,249 3,830 2.12 0.49 0.43 0.0606 1993 6,642,300 140,956 32,471 28,020 4,451 2.12 0.49 0.42 0.0670 1994 7,054,300 153,024 36,342 31,133 5,209 2.17 0.52 0.44 0.0738 1995 7,400,500 165,147 38,886 32,720 6,166 2.23 0.53
• http://www.fcc.gov/transaction/citizens-global/DA-01-961A1.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/transaction/citizens-global/DA-01-961A1.txt
  • ORDERED that the Petition to Impose Conditions of the Communications Workers of America IS DENIED. 19. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this Memorandum Opinion and Order SHALL BE EFFECTIVE upon release in accordance with 47 C.F.R. � 1.103. 20. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this action is taken under delegated authority pursuant to 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 0.101, 0.321, 0.51, 0.261, 0.331 and 0.131. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Dorothy T. Attwood Chief, Common Carrier Bureau Deborah Lathen Chief, Cable Services Bureau Donald Abelson Chief, International Bureau Thomas J. Sugrue Chief, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau
• http://www.fcc.gov/transaction/ge-ses/da012100.pdf
  • Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.65, GE Capital and SES Global are afforded thirty days from the date of release of this Order and Authorization to amend all such pending applications in connection with the instant Transfer Application to reflect the new ownership structure approved in this Order and Authorization. 66. This action is taken under delegated authority pursuant to Sections 0.51, 0.261, 0.131, 0.331 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.51, 0.261, 0.131, 0.331, and SHALL BE EFFECTIVE upon release. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Donald Abelson Chief, International Bureau Federal Communications Commission DA 01-2100 26 Thomas J. Sugrue Chief, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau Federal Communications Commission DA 01-2100 27 Appendix A List of GE Americom and Columbia Licenses and Authorizations Subject to
• http://www.fcc.gov/transaction/worldcom-intermedia/IntermediaOrderJan17.doc
  • Hold Separate Stipulation and Order referred to herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, that AT&T's ``Petition to Deny,'' filed in this proceeding IS DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this Memorandum Opinion and Order SHALL BE EFFECTIVE upon release in accordance with 47 C.F.R. � 1.103. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this action is taken under delegated authority pursuant to sections 0.51, 0.91, 0.131, 0.261, 0.291, and 0.331 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.51, 0.91, 0.131, 0.261, 0.291, 0.331. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Dorothy T. Attwood Chief, Common Carrier Bureau Donald Abelson Chief, International Bureau James D. Schlichting, Deputy Chief, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau See In re Applications of Intermedia Communications, Inc., and WorldCom, Inc., Transferee, for Consent to Transfer Control of
• http://www.fcc.gov/transaction/worldcom-intermedia/da012727.pdf
  • News media information 202 / 418-0500 Fax-On-Demand 202 / 418-2830 TTY 202 / 418-2555 Internet: http://www.fcc.gov DA 01-2727 Released: November 20, 2001 COMMON CARRIER, INTERNATIONAL, AND WIRELESS TELECOMMUNICATIONS BUREAUS MODIFY WORLDCOM-INTERMEDIA MERGER CONDITIONS CC Docket No. 00-206 Pursuant to sections 214 and 310(d) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 214 and 310(d), and sections 63.01, 0.51, 0.91, 0.131, 0.261, 0.291, and 0.331 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 63.01, 0.51, 0.91, 0.131, 0.261, 0.291, and 0.331, the Common Carrier, Wireless Telecommunications, and International Bureaus (the Bureaus) grant WorldCom, Inc.'s (WorldCom's) request to modify a condition imposed in a January 17, 2001, Bureau-level Memorandum Opinion and Order (WorldCom-Intermedia Merger Order),1 which approved the transfer of control