FCC Web Documents citing 0.5

as compiled by hallikainen.com/FccRules on 2012 07 01

• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-952A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-952A1.pdf
  • that its proposal would adequately protect broadcast stations from potential harmful interference, consistent with the underlying purpose of Section 90.242(b)(4)(iv). Each application for TIS must be accompanied by a statement certifying that the proposed station satisfies the minimum separation distances specified in Section 90.242(a)(2)(i). Specifically, the proposed station must be located at least 15 km (9.3 miles) outside the measured 0.5 mV/m service contour of any broadcast station operating on the first adjacent channel, or at least 130 km (80.6 miles) for broadcast stations operating on a co-channel basis. Arlington states that Fire Station #2 would be located 82.18 km from first adjacent channel station WPTX, Lexington Park, Maryland, operating on frequency 1690 kHz. The separation between the respective stations' 0.5
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-684A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-684A1.pdf
  • beyond eighty kilometers of Philadelphia, Pennsylvania pursuant to Section 1.925 of the Commission's rules, or, alternatively, Section 337(c) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``the Act''). In addition, York requests to license individually eighty-three control stations to be associated with the twenty-two-site system. All control stations would be located within York County except for one that would be 0.5 kilometers into adjacent Adams County, Pennsylvania. York notes that all would be within the currently authorized mobile area of operation, thus meeting the requirement of Section 90.305(c). Although York does not require a waiver for the proposed control stations, we consider them in this Order as a matter of administrative efficiency, given that the subject control stations comprise an integral
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-250A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-250A1.pdf
  • application to the instant case, we now examine whether the County's proposed operations would protect other stations from harmful interference. Each application for TIS must be accompanied by a statement certifying that the proposed station satisfies the minimum separation distances specified in Section 90.242(a)(2)(i). Specifically, the proposed station must be located at least 15 kilometers (9.3 miles) outside the measured 0.5 mV/m service contour of any broadcast station operating on the first adjacent channel, or at least 130 kilometers (80.6 miles) for broadcast stations operating on a co-channel basis. The County provided an engineering analysis indicating that its closest TIS station would be located 31 kilometers from the 0.5 mV/m service contour of first adjacent channel Station WPTX, Lexington Park, Maryland,
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-695A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-695A1.pdf
  • Rico band plan; next, the ESMR portion of the band plan; and last, the transition period in Puerto Rico. Band Plan Elements Applicable to the Non-ESMR Band Under the TA Proposal, the Puerto Rico band plan is similar to the band plan for non-border regions of the United States (U.S. Band Plan), except that the Expansion Band is increased by 0.5 megahertz by eliminating the lower 0.5 megahertz portion of the Guard Band. This places the Puerto Rico Expansion Band at 815-816.5/860-861.5 MHz, and the Puerto Rico Guard Band at 816.5-817/861.5-862 MHz. The band plan accommodates all non-ESMR incumbents in the non-ESMR portion of the band and no incumbent will be relocated more than once, except in the case of a
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-816A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-816A1.pdf
  • the occupational limit fence around the perimeter of this site with warning signs to enclose the area below occupational limits but above public exposure RFR limits. As such the occupational RFR limits apply inside the inner fence. Public limits apply outside the outer fence. The maximum RFR reading at the site was 0.89 milliwatts/cm2 along the north inner fence at 0.5 meters from the ground. Levels along the other inner fence borders ranged from 0.13 milliwatts/cm2 to 0.32 milliwatts/cm2. Additionally, one location outside the inner fence showed a reading of 0.79 milliwatts/cm2. This was 5 meters west northwest of the northwest corner of the fenced area at 0.5 meters from ground level. This was the highest level between the two fence
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-275668A1.pdf
  • about 20 seconds of monitoring) on the next step. In a few cases sound dropped out and back in during the 20-second monitoring, but was absent well over50% of the time. The interference amplitude at which greater than 50 percentloss of sound occurred was then known to be between the measured level and the previous step, 1 dB lower; consequently, 0.5 dB was subtracted from the measured power to obtain the nominal thresholdat which soundloss exceeds 50 percent. Interference threshold measurements based on loss of sound were performed as a matter of convenience, though the actual parameter of interest is the undesired signal level at the threshold of visibility (TOV) of picture degradation. Because of the cliff effect that is observed
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-300946A7.pdf
  • Collinsville Police Department Collinsville -- No No City of Collinsville Primary Owasso Police Department Owasso -- Yes No City of Owasso Primary Broken Arrow Police Department Broken Arrow -- Yes No City of Broken Arrow and portion of Wagoner County Primary Bixby Police Department Bixby -- Yes No City of Bixby Primary Tulsa Sand Springs Police Department Sand Springs -- 0.5 No City of Sand Springs Primary E9-1-1 ASSESSMENT AND STRATEGIC PLAN FOR THE STATE OF OKLAHOMA © 2007 Intrado Inc. All rights reserved. Page 82 Oklahoma Wireless E9-1-1 Level of Service County Agency Location Phase 0 Phase I Phase II Boundaries Primary/ Secondary Jenks Police Department Jenks -- Yes No City of Jenks Primary Glenpool Police Department Glenpool -- Yes
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-107A1.pdf
  • additional non- Signatory ownership existed prior to the IPO. Of the Signatory ownership, Comsat, a subsidiary of Lockheed Martin Corporation, a publicly traded U.S. company, holds 14.5 percent of outstanding New Skies shares.43 No INTELSAT Signatory other than Comsat holds more than 4.4 percent post-IPO interest in New Skies. And 84 percent of New Skies non-public shareholders own less than 0.5 percent each of the outstanding shares.44 18. LMGT agrees that New Skies has achieved "substantial dilution" under the terms of the ORBIT Act. LMGT states that the issue of substantial dilution requires an individualized determination based on the company's particular circumstances.45 It contends that the market conditions that existed and the amount of dilution achieved in comparison with other companies
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-303A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-303A1.pdf http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-303A1.txt
  • bandwidth indicated. 2Attenuation measured within the transmit band excludes the band ± 35 kHz of the carrier frequency. * * * * * (3) * * * Frequency Offset (normalized to SR) Attenuation (dB) +/-0.75 x SR 0 +/-1.40 x SR 20 +/-2.95 x SR 40 Where: SR = Symbol Rate SR = 1 x channel rate for BPSK SR= 0.5 x channel rate for QPSK * * * * * Section 87.147 is amended by adding paragraph (f) and revising paragraph (d) to read as follows: § 87.147 Authorization of equipment. * * * * * (d) An applicant for certification of equipment intended for transmission in any of the frequency bands listed in paragraph (d)(3) of this section must
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-108A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-108A1.pdf
  • wireline telephone service, the cost would average 28 cents per subscribing household. See n.153, supra. Specifically, a $27 million charge to carriers, converted to a rate increase to 96-98 million residential ratepayers, would average 1.3 cents per month per ratepayer using a relatively rapid amortization period of two years and a relatively high discount rate of 12%; and would average 0.5 cents per month per ratepayer using a relatively slow amortization period of 5 years and a relatively low discount rate of 6%. See ¶ 8, supra. House Report No. 103-827, at 3493. USTA Comments, at 13. See ¶ 60, supra. 47 U.S.C. § 1006(b)(5). Order, supra n.17, at ¶ 12. Because the pleading cycle closed prior to the Commission's decision
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-180A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-180A1.pdf http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-180A1.txt
  • promotes gigabit wireless access as a complement or supplement to optical fiber in urban, suburban, and even rural areas for a range of uses such as internet access or backhaul to cellular or PCS towers. To accomplish these goals, Loea envisions the deployment of highly directional, fixed point-to-point, high millimeter wave systems that would transmit narrow beams (typically less than 0.5 degrees beamwidth) with large bandwidths (of 5 GHz) along straight paths to cover relatively short distances (of 10 miles or less). Loea also contends that the technical characteristics of such systems allow for the operation of a vast number of users and paths in any given geographical area. Further, Endwave contends that high millimeter wave systems would be more cost
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-222A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-222A1.pdf http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-222A1.txt
  • a rural 800 MHz cellular system, we found that increasing the base station power by 10 percent (500 W ERP to 550 W ERP) and 20 percent (500 W ERP to 600 W ERP) increased the base station range by 1.5 km (0.93 mi) and 3 km (1.86 mi) respectively. We note, however, that our calculations show that a typical 0.5 W ERP mobile unit would not have sufficient range to reach the base station from the edge of the base station coverage area regardless of whether the base station power is 500 (maximum under the rules today), 550, or 600 W ERP. Similarly, in the case of a rural 1,900 MHz PCS system, we found that increasing the base station
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-77A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-77A1.pdf http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-77A1.txt
  • The mean power of emissions shall be attenuated in accordance with the following schedule: (A) In any 4 kHz band, the center frequency of which is removed from the center frequency of the assigned channel by more than 50 percent of the channel bandwidth and is within the bands 18,820-18870 MHz or 19,19160-19,210 MHz: A = 35 + .003(F - 0.5B) dB or, 80 dB (whichever is the lesser attenuation). Where A = Attenuation (in decibels) below output power level contained within the channel for a given polarization. B = Bandwidth of channel in kHz. F = Absolute value of the difference between the center frequency of the 4 kHz band measured at the center frequency of the channel in kHz.
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-35A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-35A1.pdf
  • COMMISSION Marlene H. Dortch Secretary APPENDIX Parts 0, 4, 11, 64, and 90 of Title 47 of the Code of Federal Regulations are amended as follows: PART 0 - COMMISSION ORGANIZATION 1. The authority citation for Part 0 continues to read as follows: AUTHORITY: Secs. 5, 48 Stat. 1068, as amended; 47 U.S.C. 155, 225, unless otherwise noted. 2. Section 0.5 is amended by revising paragraph (a) to read as follows: § 0.5 General description of Commission organization and operations. (a) Principal staff units. The Commission is assisted in the performance of its responsibilities by its staff, which is divided into the following principal units: * * * * * Public Safety and Homeland Security Bureau. * * * * *
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-125A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-125A1.pdf
  • PR); WPEZ750 (Santurce, PR); WPFA265 (San Juan, PR); WPFA266 (Santurce, PR); WPFA268 (Santurce, PR); WPFA269 (Santurce, PR); WPFA270 (Santurce, PR); WPFA273 (Santurce, PR); WPFA278 (Santurce, PR); WPFA280 (Santurce, PR); WPFD607 (Santurce, PR); WPFD808 (Santurce, PR); WPFD809 (Santurce, PR); WPFD810 (Santurce, PR); WPFD811 (Santurce, PR); WPFD812 (Santurce, PR); WPFE472 (Santurce, PR); WPFE934 (Cayey, PR); WPFG589 (no ULS address; coordinates 18-16-08.8 N, 066-04-00.5 W); WPFG599 (Caguas, PR); WPFM597 (Cayey, PR); WPFM600 (San Juan, PR); WPFN354 (Aguada, PR); WPFN600 (Anasco, PR); WPFN636 (Anasco, PR); WPFN725 (Anasco, PR); WPFQ293 (Charlotte Amalie, VI); WPFS846 (Saint Croix, VI); WPFS856 (Saint Croix, VI); WPFT334 (Saint Croix, VI); WPFT335 (Saint Croix, VI); WPFT335 (Aguada, PR); WPFT356 (Aguada, PR); WPFT357 (Saint Croix, VI); WPFT369 (Charlotte Amalie, VI); WPFT416 (Charlotte Amalie,
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-225A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-225A1.pdf
  • to our decision in Qualcomm as it is instructive to our instant analysis. After conducting our own review of the Engineering Study, we note that the affected population percentages predicted by New York are within the de minimis standards and exceptions established in Qualcomm. Due to the incremental increase of allowable interference in Qualcomm, the de minimis allowance changed from 0.5 percent to 1.0 percent effective October 13, 2007. Therefore, the percentages of TV station service populations predicted to receive interference, with a maximum of 0.96 percent, are now within the current 1.0 percent de minimis allowance. Based on our observations, we therefore disagree with WFUT-TV's contention that the de minimis threshold is inapplicable to the Waiver Request. Qualcomm observes in
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-85A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-85A1.pdf http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-85A1.txt
  • is amended by revising paragraphs (a)(2)(i), (a)(2)(ii), (a)(3), (a)(4), (a)(6), and (a)(7) to read as follows: § 90.242 Travelers' information stations. (a) * * * * * (2) * * * * * (i) A statement certifying that the transmitting site of the Travelers' Information Station will be located at least 15 km (9.3 miles) measured orthogonally outside the measured 0.5 mV/m daytime contour (0.1 mV/m for Class A stations) of any AM broadcast station operating on a first adjacent channel or at least 130 km (80.6 miles) outside the measured 0.5 mV/m daytime contour (0.1 mV/m for Class A stations) of any AM broadcast station operating on the same channel, or, if nighttime operation is proposed, outside the theoretical 0.5
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-250A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-250A1.pdf
  • Requested, to Christian Voice of Central Ohio, Inc., c/o David J. Kaufman, Esq., Rini Coran, PC, 1615 L Street, N.W., Suite 1325, Washington, DC 20036. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Marlene H. Dortch Secretary See Christian Voice of Central Ohio, Petition for Reconsideration (filed June 9, 2008) (``Petition''). The Enforcement Bureau has referred this matter to the full Commission pursuant to Section 0.5(c) of the Rules. See 47 C.F.R. § 0.5(c). See also 47 C.F.R. § 1.106(a)(1). In April 2004, after the complaint initiating this matter had been filed, but before the Enforcement Bureau had inquired into the matter, Christian Voice sought to modify the Station's noncommercial educational license so that it could operate WCVZ(FM) as a commercial facility. See File No. BMLH-20040415AEI,
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-99A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-99A1.pdf
  • both a common vibration cadence and a common audio attention signal on any device offered to the public for reception of commercial mobile alerts. Specifically, as the CMSAAC recommended, we specify a temporal pattern for the audio attention signal of one long tone of two (2) seconds, followed by two short tones of one (1) second each, with a half (0.5) second interval between the tones. We will also require that the entire sequence be repeated twice with a half (0.5) second interval between repetitions. For devices with polyphonic capabilities, we adopt the CMSAAC's recommendation that the audio attention signal consist of the two EAS tones (853 Hz and 960 Hz). For devices with a monophonic capability, we will require that
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-09-29A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-09-29A1.pdf
  • nine one-megahertz channels and nine five-megahertz channels. Accordingly, there is a discrepancy between the Commission's decision and the rule concerning the number of channels designated for each bandwidth. Channel number 14 is designated as a five-megahertz bandwidth channel in the rules. However, the band edges of its upper neighbors, channel numbers 15 and 16 (each one megahertz wide) are only 0.5 and 1.5 megahertz away, respectively, and the band edge of its lower neighbor, channel number 13 (five megahertz wide) is only 0.5 megahertz away. Therefore, the five megahertz bandwidth of channel number 14 overlaps the bandwidth of channel numbers 13, 15 and 16. Since none of the other channels in the 4.9 GHz band have overlapping bandwidth, we tentatively conclude
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-97-68A1.pdf
  • Section73.182restricts·thelocatiortofthetransmissionfacilitiesof540-800kHzstationsin order,topreventsecondharmonicinterferenceto.existingbandstations.SunriseBroadcasting ofNewYork,Inc.;licenseeofWGNY;Newburgh,NewYork("WQNY")rnaintainsthatthe COIDnlissiOndidnotfollow·thestandardannoUncedinOrderItocalculateharmonicinterference betWeenexistingandExpandedBandstations.Moreover,WGNYcontendsthatweshould .reconsiderthestatedOrderistandardwhichprovidessignificantlygreaterharrnoni<:interference pr()tectionthanthestandardsetforthintheCommission's Itargues.thattherule,itself, istoopreclusiveandurgestheCommissionto"revisit"thisissuetoensurethatthefmala,llotment planachievesthegreatest'possibleinterferencereductionsamonglicensedstations. .4.InOrder1,weproposedtoprecludeExpandedBandassignmentswhichwouldresult inprohibitedsecondhaitnonicoverlap,asdeterrninedinaccordancewith47 ().f·R§ SeeOrderI, 10FCCRcdat12148;.However,OrderImisstatesthisruleasprohibitingleast2,500personsandits0.5 mV/mcontourelsewhere.Thecomputerprogram,however,used themorepreclusive0.5 mV/msignalstrengthfortheprotectedcOQ.tourinallinstances. 6.-WechoosenottoincorporateintothegenerationoftheThirdAllotmentPlanthetwo signalstrengthcontourvaluesgiveninSection73.182(d)andconcludethatitismoreappropriate todetermineharmonicpreclusionsbasedsolelyonthe0.5 mV/mprotectionstandard,regardh:ss 6fthepopulationofthecommunityinwhichthetrarismissionfacilitiesofthelowerfrequency stationislocated;Thisactionisconsistentwithourobjectivethroughoutthisproceedingto authorize,tothemaximumextentpossible,newinterference-freeAMstationservicesinthe ExpandedBand.The0.5 mV/mstandardcomportswiththetechnicalframeworkusedtodevelop eachoftheallotmentplans,anditsuseisgenerallymoreconsistentwithinterferenceprotection standardsintheAMservicethanisthe2.0 mV/mcontour.WefurthernotethattheExpanded Bandproceedinghasdefinedastation'sdaytimeserviceareaas.its0.5mV/mcontour.AM ImprovementOrder.6FCCRcdat6310;seealsoid.at6287-88(affirminguseof"protected" valueof0.5 mV/mfordeteflllifungwherestationprovidesadequatesignal).Additionally,the daytimecomponentoftheimprovementfactor, seeNoteI.infra.parallelsthis.defInition,using astation's0.5 mV/mcontourtocalculateitsdaytimeservicearea.See47.C.F.R.§73.35.5 )"Twostations,onewithafrequencytwiceoftheother,shouldnotbeassignedinthesamegroundwaveservice areaunlessspecialprecautionsaretakentoavoidinterferencefromthesecondharmonicofthestationoperatingon thelowerfrequency...."47C.F.R.§73.182(s). ,OrderI. 10FCCRcdat12148("Theserviceareaofastationisthatareaprotectedfrominterferenceandis definedasthe0.5mV/mforruralareasinSection73.182(d)oftherules.");Orderll.11FCCRcdat12448 ("Section73.182(d)oftheCommission'srulesdefines{theSection73.182(s)]serviceareaasthe0.5mV/m contour:'). ,Incontrast,the2.0mV/mprimaryservicecontourspecifiedinSection73.182(d)isnolongerfactoredinto interferenceanalysesinAMapplicationprocessing.AMImprovementOrder,6.FCCRcdat Ithasbeen inhearingstocomparetheareasandpopulationsservedbyfacilitiesproposedincompetingapplications.. 3363 FederalCommunicationsCommission FCC97-68 Moreover,theuseoftwocontourvalues,dependingonthelocationoftheexistingbandstation's transmissionfacilities,wouldlikelyengenderdisputesaboutthelocationandpopulationof particularcommunities,boundariesofunincorporatedareasandsimilarfactually-intensive controversiesthatcouldconsumelimitedstaffresourceswithoutnecessarilyimprovingtheoverall allotmentplan.Finally,ourpreliminaryanalysisindicatesthattheuseoftwocontourvalues wouldnot,toanysignificantextent,permitadditionalExpandedBandAllotments.Forallof thesereasonswebelievethebettercourSeistocontinuetoprotectmigratorstothiscontourand precludesecondharmonicExpandedBandfrequencyassignmentswheretheproposedstation's 0.5mVlmcoritourwouldencompassthetransmittersiteofailauthorized810-850kHzstation. 7.Finally,WGNYproposesthat,ratherthanincorporatingtheharmonicprotection requirementsofSection73.182,weshouldprecludeExpandedBandallotmentsonlywherethe operatingstation's10 mV/mcontouroverlapsanyportionoftheExpandedBandstation's2.0 mV/mcontour.WGNYsubmitsthatitslessrestrictivestandardwouldpromotetheefficientuse oftheExpandedBand.Wedisagree.Theimportanceofmakinginterference-freeExpande.d BandassignmentstipsthebalanceagainstWGNY'spreclusionstandardwhichwouldneedlessly exposesomeExparldedBandstationstosecondharmonicinterference.Wedonotwishto achievethegoalofreducinginterferencetotheexistingbandattheexpenseofincreasingthe potentialforharmonicinterferencetonewExpandedBaildstations.Accordingly,wereject WGNY'spropoSal.6 8.TISStationProtection.WGNYcalculatesthatfederalTISStationKPC712should have--but'didnot--precludeaWGNYallotmenton1620
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/prod/cdbs/forms/prod/faq_exhibits.htm
  • first column containing depression angle values and second (and subsequent, when applicable) column(s) containing relative field values. When applicable, the first row shall list the azimuth angle being tabulated. The range of depression angles shall be 10 degrees above horizontal (-10 degrees depression) to 90 degrees below horizontal (90 degrees depression) and shall include data points spaced not more than 0.5-degree between -5 and 10 degrees depression angle, and not more than 5 degrees elsewhere. All pattern minima and maxima shall be included. Additional elevation antenna (or radiation) pattern data may be included following the column corresponding to 350 degrees TN so that the direction(s) of maximum and minimum radiation are provided. A relative field value of 1 shall correspond to
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/prod/cdbs/forms/prod/faq_informal.htm
  • required information and choose a purpose of "Analog Termination Information Update". Note: If you need to file another Update form, specify the previous one and use "Copy Form" again. Q. OMB Number/Paperwork Reduction Act information for Informal Forms. FCC NOTICE REQUIRED BY THE PAPERWORK REDUCTION ACT We have estimated that each response to this collection of information will take from 0.5 to 5 hours. Our estimate includes the time to read the instructions, look through existing records, gather and maintain the required data, and actually complete and review the form or response. If you have any comments on this burden estimate, or on how we can improve the collection and reduce the burden it causes you, please e-mail them to pra@fcc.gov
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-1100A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-1100A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-1100A1.txt
  • most recent bidding round plus one minus the weighting factor times the activity index from the prior round. The activity index is then used to calculate a percentage increment by multiplying a minimum percentage increment by one plus the activity index with that result being subject to a maximum percentage increment. The Commission will initially set the weighting factor at 0.5, the minimum percentage increment at 0.1, and the maximum percentage increment at 0.2. (See example below.) Ai = (C * Bi) + ( (1-C) * Ai-1) Ii+1 = smaller of ( (1 + Ai) * N) and M where, Ai = activity index for the current round (round i) C = activity weight factor Bi = number of bids in
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-112A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-112A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-112A1.txt
  • most recent bidding round plus one minus the weighting factor times the activity index from the prior round. The activity index is then used to calculate a percentage increment by multiplying a minimum percentage increment by one plus the activity index with that result being subject to a maximum percentage increment. The Commission will initially set the weighting factor at 0.5, the minimum percentage increment at 0.1, and the maximum percentage increment at 0.2. (See example below.) Ai = (C * Bi) + ( (1-C) * Ai-1) Ii+1 = smaller of ( (1 + Ai) * N) and M where, Ai = activity index for the current round (round i) C = activity weight factor Bi = number of bids in
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-1388A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-1388A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-1388A1.txt
  • most recent bidding round plus one minus the weighting factor times the activity index from the prior round. The activity index is then used to calculate a percentage increment by multiplying a minimum percentage increment by one plus the activity index with that result being subject to a maximum percentage increment. The Commission will initially set the weighting factor at 0.5, the minimum percentage increment at 0.1, and the maximum percentage increment at 0.2. (See example below.) Ai = (C * Bi) + ( (1-C) * Ai-1) Ii+1 = smaller of ( (1 + Ai) * N) and M where, Ai = activity index for the current round (round i) C = activity weight factor Bi = number of bids in
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2038A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2038A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2038A1.txt
  • most recent bidding round plus one minus the weighting factor times the activity index from the prior round. The activity index is then used to calculate a percentage increment by multiplying a minimum percentage increment by one plus the activity index with that result being subject to a maximum percentage increment. The Commission will initially set the weighting factor at 0.5, the minimum percentage increment at 0.1 (10%), and the maximum percentage increment at 0.2 (20%). Equations Ai = (C * Bi) + (1-C) * Ai-1) Ii+1 = smaller of ( (1 + Ai) * N) and M where, Ai = activity index for the current round (round i) C = activity weight factor Bi = number of bids in the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2259A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2259A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2259A1.txt
  • most recent bidding round plus one minus the weighting factor times the activity index from the prior round. The activity index is then used to calculate a percentage increment by multiplying a minimum percentage increment by one plus the activity index with that result being subject to a maximum percentage increment. The Commission will initially set the weighting factor at 0.5, the minimum percentage increment at 0.1, and the maximum percentage increment at 0.2. (See example below.) Ai = (C * Bi) + ( (1-C) * Ai-1) Ii+1 = smaller of ( (1 + Ai) * N) and M where, Ai = activity index for the current round (round i) C = activity weight factor Bi = number of bids in
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2416A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2416A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2416A1.txt
  • is required. In order to evaluate the Section 307(b) considerations, the staff requires submission of additional information. Specifically, where the mutually exclusive group consists of proposals to serve different communities, each applicant within the group must submit by December 29, 2000, an amendment containing supplemental information including the following: (1) the area and population within the proposed 2 mV/m and 0.5 mV/m contours; (2) the number of stations licensed to the proposed community of license; (3) the number of stations providing protected service to the proposed community of license; (4) the population (according to the latest Census data) of the proposed community of license; (5) a description of the civic, cultural, religious, social and commercial attributes of the proposed community of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2581A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2581A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2581A1.txt
  • for uplink TT&C operations. Each satellite will have at least one wide-field and two narrow-field cameras plus sensors for near-infrared observation and electromagnetic sensors for lightning observation. These cameras will be capable of providing a new image every few seconds, showing the Earth's full disk at a resolution of 5.5 kilometers, and close-up views at a resolution as good as 0.5 kilometer. Finally, AstroVision requests authority to operate as a non-common carrier. AstroVision requests authority to transmit in the 8025-8400 MHz band from its two satellites to receiving earth stations in the United States. Specifically, AstroVision proposes to operate its system's two wideband downlink channels at center frequencies of 8065 MHz and 8330 MHz, with a bandwidth of 80 MHz each
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-292A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-292A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-292A1.txt
  • most recent bidding round plus one minus the weighting factor times the activity index from the prior round. The activity index is then used to calculate a percentage increment by multiplying a minimum percentage increment by one plus the activity index with that result being subject to a maximum percentage increment. The Commission will initially set the weighting factor at 0.5, the minimum percentage increment at 0.1, and the maximum percentage increment at 0.2. (See example below.) Ai = (C * Bi) + ( (1-C) * Ai-1) Ii+1 = smaller of ( (1 + Ai) * N) and M where, Ai = activity index for the current round (round i) C = activity weight factor Bi = number of bids in
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-43A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-43A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-43A1.txt
  • most recent bidding round plus one minus the weighting factor times the activity index from the prior round. The activity index is then used to calculate a percentage increment by multiplying a minimum percentage increment by one plus the activity index with that result being subject to a maximum percentage increment. The Commission will initially set the weighting factor at 0.5, the minimum percentage increment at 0.1, and the maximum percentage increment at 0.2. Equations Ai = (C * Bi) + ( (1-C) * Ai-1) Ii+1 = smaller of ( (1 + Ai) * N) and M where, Ai = activity index for the current round (round i) C = activity weight factor Bi = number of bids in the current
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-504A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-504A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-504A1.txt
  • most recent bidding round plus one minus the weighting factor times the activity index from the prior round. The activity index is then used to calculate a percentage increment by multiplying a minimum percentage increment by one plus the activity index with that result being subject to a maximum percentage increment. The Commission will initially set the weighting factor at 0.5, the minimum percentage increment at 0.1, and the maximum percentage increment at 0.2. Equations Ai = (C * Bi) + (1-C) * Ai-1) Ii+1 = smaller of ( (1 + Ai) * N) and M where, Ai = activity index for the current round (round i) C = activity weight factor Bi = number of bids in the current round
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-559A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-559A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-559A1.txt
  • most recent bidding round plus one minus the weighting factor times the activity index from the prior round. The activity index is then used to calculate a percentage increment by multiplying a minimum percentage increment by one plus the activity index with that result being subject to a maximum percentage increment. The Commission will initially set the weighting factor at 0.5, the minimum percentage increment at 0.1, and the maximum percentage increment at 0.2. Equations Ai = (C * Bi) + ( (1-C) * Ai-1) Ii+1 = smaller of ( (1 + Ai) * N) and M where, Ai = activity index for the current round (round i) C = activity weight factor Bi = number of bids in the current
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-667A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-667A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-667A1.txt
  • most recent bidding round plus one minus the weighting factor times the activity index from the prior round. The activity index is then used to calculate a percentage increment by multiplying a minimum percentage increment by one plus the activity index with that result being subject to a maximum percentage increment. The Commission will initially set the weighting factor at 0.5, the minimum percentage increment at 0.1, and the maximum percentage increment at 0.2. Equations Ai = (C * Bi) + ( (1-C) * Ai-1) Ii+1 = smaller of ( (1 + Ai) * N) and M where, Ai = activity index for the current round (round i) C = activity weight factor Bi = number of bids in the current
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-668A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-668A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-668A1.txt
  • most recent bidding round plus one minus the weighting factor times the activity index from the prior round. The activity index is then used to calculate a percentage increment by multiplying a minimum percentage increment by one plus the activity index with that result being subject to a maximum percentage increment. The Commission will initially set the weighting factor at 0.5, the minimum percentage increment at 0.1, and the maximum percentage increment at 0.2. Equations Ai = (C * Bi) + ( (1-C) * Ai-1) Ii+1 = smaller of ( (1 + Ai) * N) and M where, Ai = activity index for the current round (round i) C = activity weight factor Bi = number of bids in the current
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-781A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-781A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-781A1.txt
  • most recent bidding round plus one minus the weighting factor times the activity index from the prior round. The activity index is then used to calculate a percentage increment by multiplying a minimum percentage increment by one plus the activity index with that result being subject to a maximum percentage increment. The Commission will initially set the weighting factor at 0.5, the minimum percentage increment at 0.1, and the maximum percentage increment at 0.2. (See example below.) Ai = (C * Bi) + ( (1-C) * Ai-1) Ii+1 = smaller of ( (1 + Ai) * N) and M where, Ai = activity index for the current round (round i) C = activity weight factor Bi = number of bids in
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-89A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-89A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-89A1.txt
  • and because they are suitable for the provision of numerous services, our analysis necessarily involves consideration of a wide range of CMRS services and certain Private Mobile Radio Service (``PMRS'') services as well. CMRS Spectrum Cap The Geotek licenses Nextel seeks to acquire would give Nextel an additional attributable interest in spectrum covered by the CMRS spectrum cap of between 0.5 and 1.75 MHz per market, or between 20 and 70 SMR channels per market. The proposed acquisition does not violate the general CMRS spectrum cap rule because the only spectrum counted for the purpose of determining compliance with the cap in which Nextel has an attributable interest is SMR spectrum, and holdings of SMR spectrum alone cannot violate the cap.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-89A1_Erratum.doc
  • and because they are suitable for the provision of numerous services, our analysis necessarily involves consideration of a wide range of CMRS services and certain Private Mobile Radio Service (``PMRS'') services as well. CMRS Spectrum Cap The Geotek licenses Nextel seeks to acquire would give Nextel an additional attributable interest in spectrum covered by the CMRS spectrum cap of between 0.5 and 1.75 MHz per market, or between 20 and 70 SMR channels per market. The proposed acquisition does not violate the general CMRS spectrum cap rule because the only spectrum counted for the purpose of determining compliance with the cap in which Nextel has an attributable interest is SMR spectrum, and holdings of SMR spectrum alone cannot violate the cap.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1400A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1400A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1400A1.txt
  • most recent bidding round plus one minus the weighting factor times the activity index from the prior round. The activity index is then used to calculate a percentage increment by multiplying a minimum percentage increment by one plus the activity index with that result being subject to a maximum percentage increment. The Commission will initially set the weighting factor at 0.5, the minimum percentage increment at 0.1 (10%), and the maximum percentage increment at 0.2 (20%). Equations Ai = (C * Bi) + ( (1-C) * Ai-1) Ii+1 = smaller of ( (1 + Ai) * N) and M X i+1 = Ii+1 * Yi where, Ai = activity index for the current round (round i) C = activity weight factor
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1527A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1527A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1527A1.txt
  • most recent bidding round plus one minus the weighting factor times the activity index from the prior round. The activity index is then used to calculate a percentage increment by multiplying a minimum percentage increment by one plus the activity index with that result being subject to a maximum percentage increment. The Commission will initially set the weighting factor at 0.5, the minimum percentage increment at 0.1 (10%), and the maximum percentage increment at 0.2 (20%). Equations Ai = (C * Bi) + ( (1-C) * Ai-1) Ii+1 = smaller of ( (1 + Ai) * N) and M X i+1 = Ii+1 * Yi where, Ai = activity index for the current round (round i) C = activity weight factor
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1592A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1592A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1592A1.txt
  • value based on the bidding activity on that license. This methodology allows the increments to be tailored to the activity level of a license, decreasing the time it takes for active licenses to reach their final value. The formula used to calculate this increment is included as Attachment G. We adopt our proposal of initially setting the weighing factor at 0.5, the minimum percentage increment at 0.1 (10 percent of the license value), and the maximum at 0.2 (20 percent of the license value). The Bureau retains the discretion to change the minimum acceptable bids and bid increments if it determines that circumstance so dictate. The Bureau will do so by announcement in the Automated Auction System. Under its discretion, the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1789A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1789A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1789A1.txt
  • value based on the bidding activity on that license. This methodology allows the increments to be tailored to the activity level of a license, decreasing the time it takes for active licenses to reach their final value. The formula used to calculate this increment is included as Attachment H. We adopt our proposal of initially setting the weighing factor at 0.5, the minimum percentage increment at 0.1 (10 percent), and the maximum at 0.2 (20 percent). The Bureau retains the discretion to change the minimum acceptable bids and bid increments if it determines that circumstance so dictate. The Bureau will do so by announcement in the Automated Auction System. Under its discretion, the Bureau may also implement an absolute dollar floor
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1907A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1907A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1907A1.txt
  • and 243A, both at Evant, were withdrawn from MM Docket No. 99-358 by Evant Radio Company on or about October 10, 2000. See Amendment of Section 73.202(b), Table of Allotments, FM Broadcast Stations (Burnet, Texas), MM Docket No. 99-358, DA 01-1595 (released July 6, 2001). The proposed allotment of Channel 243A at Evant requires a site restriction of 0.8 km (0.5 miles) north of Evant at the coordinates indicated above. Petitioner states that Evant is an incorporated community with a population in excess of 450 persons. FCC Contact: Deborah A. Dupont (202) 418-7072 MM Docket No. 01-189; RM-10204 Petitioner: Katherine Pyeatt 6655 Airtree Circle Dallas, Texas 75214 Proposal: Allot Channel 263A at Winnsboro, Texas as the community's first competing FM transmission
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2033A1.doc
  • are toll and how many are interlocal because switch measurements can not determine where an incoming call originated. Historically, ALLTEL had counted one terminating minute for each originating interlocal minute over these shared trunks. In 2000, however, ALLTEL conducted traffic studies which indicated that Internet traffic does not follow this one-terminating-to-one-originating-minute relationship. Instead, ALLTEL determined that applying a factor of 0.5 to its number of originating Internet minutes more accurately represented the number of terminating Internet minutes it received over the shared trunks. This is because ALLTEL's customers call ISPs, creating originating minutes, but ISPs do not call back, therefore ALLTEL was not receiving terminating minutes corresponding to these originated Internet calls. For purposes of calculating its DEM factor, ALLTEL applied
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2073A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2073A2.txt
  • File No. Type Licensee Name Call SignFrequency City Private Carrier Paging, 929-930 MHz GS 25-0-26.5-N 80-31-14.2-W N/A WAV ABC PAGING INC KNNQ624 929.4625TAVERNIER Private Carrier Paging, 929-930 MHz GS 24-48-47.5-N 80-49-34.2-W N/A WAV ABC PAGING INC KNNQ624 929.4625LONG KEY Private Carrier Paging, 929-930 MHz GS 24-41-29.5-N 81-6-2.3-W N/A WAV ABC PAGING INC KNNQ624 929.4625MARATHON Private Carrier Paging, 929-930 MHz GS 24-41-0.5-N 81-29-29.3-W N/A WAV ABC PAGING INC KNNQ624 929.4625CUDJOE KEY Private Carrier Paging, 929-930 MHz GS 24-33-19.5-N 81-48-6.3-W N/A WAV ABC PAGING INC KNNQ624 929.4625KEY WEST Private Carrier Paging, 929-930 MHz GS 36-31-36.4-N 82-35-13.5-W N/A PFR PAGER ONE INC KNNR909 929.1125KINGSPORT Private Carrier Paging, 929-930 MHz GS 36-8-6.3-N 83-43-28.7-W N/A PFR PAGER ONE INC KNNR909 929.1125KNOXVILLE Private Carrier Paging, 929-930 MHz
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2076A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2076A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2076A1.txt
  • most recent bidding round plus one minus the weighting factor times the activity index from the prior round. The activity index is then used to calculate a percentage increment by multiplying a minimum percentage increment by one plus the activity index with that result being subject to a maximum percentage increment. The Commission will initially set the weighting factor at 0.5, the minimum percentage increment at 0.1 (10%), and the maximum percentage increment at 0.2 (20%). Equations Ai = (C * Bi) + ( (1-C) * Ai-1) Ii+1 = smaller of ( (1 + Ai) * N) and M X i+1 = Ii+1 * Yi where, Ai = activity index for the current round (round i) C = activity weight factor
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2315A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2315A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2315A1.txt
  • value based on the bidding activity on that license. This methodology allows the increments to be tailored to the activity level of a license, decreasing the time it takes for active licenses to reach their final value. The formula used to calculate this increment is included as Attachment G. We adopt our proposal of initially setting the weighing factor at 0.5, the minimum percentage increment at 0.1 (10 percent), and the maximum at 0.2 (20 percent). The Bureau retains the discretion to change the minimum acceptable bids and bid increments if it determines that circumstance so dictate. The Bureau will do so by announcement in the Automated Auction System. Under its discretion, the Bureau may also implement an absolute dollar floor
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2605A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2605A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2605A1.txt
  • most recent bidding round plus one minus the weighting factor times the activity index from the prior round. The activity index is then used to calculate a percentage increment by multiplying a minimum percentage increment by one plus the activity index with that result being subject to a maximum percentage increment. The Commission will initially set the weighting factor at 0.5, the minimum percentage increment at 0.1 (10%), and the maximum percentage increment at 0.2 (20%). Equations Ai = (C * Bi) + ( (1-C) * Ai-1) Ii+1 = smaller of ( (1 + Ai) * N) and M X i+1 = Ii+1 * Yi where, Ai = activity index for the current round (round i) C = activity weight factor
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2764A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2764A1.txt
  • protected Coordination threshold values GSO space stations Non-GSO space stations pfd (per space station) calculation factors (NOTE 2) pfd (per space station) calculation factors (NOTE 2) % FDP (in 1 MHz) (NOTE 1) P r dB/ degrees P r dB/ degrees 1 492-1 525 Analogue FS telephony (NOTE 4) 146 dB(W/m2) in 4 kHz and 128 dB(W/m2) in 1 MHz 0.5 146 dB(W/m2) in 4 kHz and 128 dB(W/m2) in 1 MHz 0.5 128 dB(W/m2) in 1 MHz 0.5 128 dB(W/m2) in 1 MHz 0.5 25
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2882A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2882A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2882A1.txt
  • the bidding activity on that construction permit. This methodology allows the increments to be tailored to the activity level of a construction permit, decreasing the time it takes for active construction permits to reach their final value. The formula used to calculate this increment is included as Attachment D. We adopt our proposal of initially setting the weighing factor at 0.5, the minimum percentage increment at 0.1 (10 percent), and the maximum at 0.2 (20 percent). The Bureaus retains the discretion to change the minimum acceptable bids and bid increments if it determines that circumstance so dictate. The Bureaus will do so by announcement in the Automated Auction System. Under its discretion, the Bureaus may also implement an absolute dollar floor
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2947A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2947A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2947A1.txt
  • rate but limit the use of this rate to service provided before January 1, 2001. We reject the rate for service provided after 2000 and direct U.S. carriers to negotiate agreements that comply with the Benchmarks Order with the carrier in Morocco. II. Background Concert filed a petition seeking to reduce its accounting rate from 0.6 SDR per minute to 0.5 SDR per minute for service with the carrier serving Morocco, Maroc Telecom. The new rate, which has no expiration date, is scheduled to take effect August 1, 2000. The International Bureau suspended Concert's modification request because the proposed rate does not have an expiration date and the rate exceeds the benchmark rate required for service with Morocco provided on and
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-477A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-477A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-477A1.txt
  • most recent bidding round plus one minus the weighting factor times the activity index from the prior round. The activity index is then used to calculate a percentage increment by multiplying a minimum percentage increment by one plus the activity index with that result being subject to a maximum percentage increment. The Commission will initially set the weighting factor at 0.5, the minimum percentage increment at 0.1 (10%), and the maximum percentage increment at 0.2 (20%). Equations Ai = (C * Bi) + ( (1-C) * Ai-1) Ii+1 = smaller of ( (1 + Ai) * N) and M where, Ai = activity index for the current round (round i) C = activity weight factor Bi = number of bids in
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-539A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-539A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-539A1.txt
  • Eustis timely filed the Johnstown application during the AM auction filing window. The Johnstown application was not identified as a singleton application in the September 22, 2000, public notice which listed the singleton applications filed during the AM auction filing window. On October 10, 2000, Eustis filed a technical amendment to his Johnstown application, proposing to reduce nighttime power from 0.5 kilowatt to 0.35 kilowatt. On October 27, 2000, the MX Public Notice identified the mutually exclusive applications filed during the AM auction filing window and announced that Eustis's Johnstown application was mutually exclusive with the Mesquite application. In his November 17, 2000, petition for partial reconsideration of the MX Public Notice Eustis asserts that his Johnstown application is not mutually
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-746A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-746A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-746A1.txt
  • value based on the bidding activity on that license. This methodology allows the increments to be tailored to the activity level of a license, decreasing the time it takes for active licenses to reach their final value. The formula used to calculate this increment is included as Attachment G. We adopt our proposal of initially setting the weighing factor at 0.5, the minimum percentage increment at 0.1 (10 percent of the license value), and the maximum at 0.2 (20 percent of the license value). The Bureau retains the discretion to change the minimum bid increment if it determines that circumstance so dictate. The Bureau will do so by announcement in the Automated Auction System. Under its discretion, the Bureau may also
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-786A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-786A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-786A1.txt
  • from 3G base stations. Table 5.1: Calculation of Separation Distances, 3G Base Station to ITFS/MDS Guard Band Analysis Based on Interference Power in Adjacent or Nearby Channels 3G System Parameters ITFS/MDS System Parameters Required Separation (km) Modulation Type EIRP (dBW) Bandwidth (kHz) Protected Receiver Bandwidth (kHz) Desired Signal Power Density (dBW/m2) Adjacent Channels (No Guard Band) Guard Band Width (MHz) 0.5 1 2 CDMA 27 1250 Hub 125 -90 161 16 1.6 0.02 CDMA 27 3750 125 -90 161 16 1.6 0.02 W-CDMA 27 5000 125 -90 161 16 1.6 0.02 TDMA 27 30 125 -90 100 10 1.0 0.02 TDMA 27 200 125 -90 161 16 1.6 0.02 CDMA 27 1250 Response Station 6000 -67 6.4 0.6 0.06 0.00 CDMA
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-786A2.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-786A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-786A2.txt
  • from 3G base stations. Table 5.1: Calculation of Separation Distances, 3G Base Station to ITFS/MDS Guard Band Analysis Based on Interference Power in Adjacent or Nearby Channels 3G System Parameters ITFS/MDS System Parameters Required Separation (km) Modulation Type EIRP (dBW) Bandwidth (kHz) Protected Receiver Bandwidth (kHz) Desired Signal Power Density (dBW/m2) Adjacent Channels (No Guard Band) Guard Band Width (MHz) 0.5 1 2 CDMA 27 1250 Hub 125 -90 161 16 1.6 0.02 CDMA 27 3750 125 -90 161 16 1.6 0.02 W-CDMA 27 5000 125 -90 161 16 1.6 0.02 TDMA 27 30 125 -90 100 10 1.0 0.02 TDMA 27 200 125 -90 161 16 1.6 0.02 CDMA 27 1250 Response Station 6000 -67 6.4 0.6 0.06 0.00 CDMA
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-101A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-101A1.txt
  • threshold values GSO space stations Non-GSO space stations pfd (per space station) calculation factors (NOTE 2) pfd (per space station) calculation factors (NOTE 2) % FDP (in 1 MHz) (NOTE 1) P r dB/ degrees P r dB/ degrees 1 492-1 525 Analogue FS telephony (NOTE 5) ­ 146 dB(W/m2) in 4 kHz and ­ 128 dB(W/m2) in 1 MHz 0.5 ­ 146 dB(W/m2) in 4 kHz and ­ 128 dB(W/m2) in 1 MHz 0.5 All other cases (NOTE 4) ­ 128 dB(W/m2) in 1 MHz 0.5 ­ 128 dB(W/m2) in 1 MHz 0.5 25 18 II.Informal Working Group 3: Fixed-Satellite Service/Broadcasting- Satellite Service DRAFT PROPOSAL FOR THE WORK OF THE CONFERENCE Doc. WAC/083(19.12.01) Agenda Item 1.11: to consider possible extension
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1257A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1257A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1257A1.txt
  • bids received on the license in that round plus one minus the weighting factor times the activity index from the prior round. The percentage increment is then calculated as the smaller of (a) a minimum percentage increment multiplied by one plus the activity index and (b) a specified maximum percentage increment. The Commission will initially set the weighting factor at 0.5, the minimum percentage increment at 0.1 (10%), and the maximum percentage increment at 0.2 (20%). Hence, at these initial settings, the percentage increment will fluctuate between 10% and 20% depending upon the level of activity for the license. Equations Ai = (C * Bi) + ( (1-C) * Ai-1) Ii+1 = smaller of ( (1 + Ai) * N) and
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1285A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1285A2.txt
  • Media Network American Movie Classic America's Collectibles America's Store Animal Planet Network Arab Radio & Television (ART) G. Channel Lineup, as of July 1, 2001 & July 1, 2002 Divide channels into BST; CPST1; other analog (CPST2, pay-per-channel, pay-per-view, and other); & digital. Other Analog Other Analog Digital Other Analog Digital regional; premium or pay-per-view; or other national networks. Enter 0.5 for part-time networks. Below, do no list audio/music channels. CPST1 Digital BST CPST1 Other Analog Digital National Networks (A) Local Channels BST BST No. of Premium or Pay-Per-View in Each Major Group Regional (News, Sports, & Other) BST CPST1 CPST1 Enter the number of channels next to the type of channel or name of network. If a type of channel
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1412A2.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1412A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1412A2.txt
  • display them Use accepted web site features (e.g., drop down menus) to provide information about the purpose and function of web site elements. Availability and Access The NANPA web site shall be available 24 hours a day, 7 days a week. The web site shall be able to support up to 500 simultaneous clients with an average holding time of 0.5 hours. System Responsiveness NANPA shall provide rapid response when accessing the web site. NANPA shall provide a system such that a 56 Kbps modem-equipped user will be able to view the complete home page in less than 8 seconds, 95% of the time over any 12-month period. If a user is experiencing greater than 12 seconds to view the complete
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1415A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1415A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1415A1.txt
  • of the 39.5-42 GHz band. Proposals: USA/1.32/1 MOD TABLE 21-4 (continued) , 16, 17 -105 10, 16, 17 1 MHz 37.5-40 GHz Fixed-satellite (geostationary-satellite orbit) Mobile-satellite (geostationary-satellite orbit) -127 16, 17 5°-20° 20°-25° -105 16, 17 1 MHz -127 + (4/3) (( - 5) 16, 17 -107 + 0.4 (( - 20) 16, 17 40-40.5 GHz Fixed-satellite -115 -115 + 0.5(( - 5) -105 1 MHz 40.5-42 GHz Fixed-satellite (non-geostationary-satellite orbit) Broadcasting-satellite (non-geostationary-satellite orbit) -115 10, 16, 17, 18 -115 + 0.5(( - 5) 10, 16, 17, 18 -105 10, 16, 17 18 1 MHz 40.5-42 GHz Fixed-satellite (geostationary-satellite orbit) Broadcasting-satellite (geostationary-satellite orbit) -120 16, 17, 18 5°-15° 15°-25° -105 16, 17, 18 1 MHz -120 + (( - 5) 16,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1589A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1589A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1589A1.txt
  • the ``Non-MFN'' treatments. In the MFN treatment, affiliate revenue was reported in terms of cents per subscriber, whereas in the Non-MFN treatment, affiliate revenue was reported in terms of dollars per transaction. Because of a computational error, this difference resulted in an underestimation of affiliate revenue in the MFN treatment. An additional computational error occurred when revenue of less than 0.5 cents per subscriber was rounded to zero, causing certain transactions to be dropped inadvertently. . The computational errors led to some modest changes in the study results. The following is a list of all substantive changes: (Table 7 and Result 3) The MFN and the No MFN treatments generate similar efficiency levels when the market includes either a single ``large''
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1871A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1871A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1871A1.txt
  • based on the bidding activity on that license. This methodology allows the increments to be tailored to the activity level of a license, decreasing the time it takes for active licenses to reach their final value. The formula used to calculate this increment is included as Attachment F. Upon consideration of ArrayComm's comments, we will set the weighting factor at 0.5, the minimum percentage increment at 0.05 (5 percent), and the maximum at 0.2 (20 percent). Because only a single license is available in Auction No. 46, , we believe that it is appropriate to set the minimum bid increment at 5 percent. The Bureau reiterates that it retains the discretion to change the minimum acceptable bids and bid increments if
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1872A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1872A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1872A1.txt
  • In Regions 1 and 3 (except for Japan), in the band 8025-8400 MHz, the earth exploration-satellite service using geostationary satellites shall not produce a power flux-density in excess of the following provisional values for angles of arrival ((), without the consent of the affected administration: -174 dB(W/m²) in a 4 kHz band for 0 ( ( ( 5( -174 + 0.5 (( - 5) dB(W/m²) in a 4 kHz band for 5 ( ( ( 25( -164 dB(W/m2) in a 4 kHz band for 25 ( ( ( 90( These values are subject to study under Resolution 124 (WRC-97)*. 5.463 Aircraft stations are not permitted to transmit in the band 8025-8400 MHz. 5.465 In the space research service, the use of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-200A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-200A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-200A1.txt
  • most recent bidding round plus one minus the weighting factor times the activity index from the prior round. The activity index is then used to calculate a percentage increment by multiplying a minimum percentage increment by one plus the activity index with that result being subject to a maximum percentage increment. The Commission will initially set the weighting factor at 0.5, the minimum percentage increment at 0.1 (10%), and the maximum percentage increment at 0.2 (20%). Equations Ai = (C * Bi) + ( (1-C) * Ai-1) Ii+1 = smaller of ( (1 + Ai) * N) and M X i+1 = Ii+1 * Yi where, Ai = activity index for the current round (round i) C = activity weight factor
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2138A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2138A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2138A1.txt
  • power levels to be summed can be obtained by averaging, in linear power terms, power levels in each frequency bin across the 1 MHz. Method #2: Set zero span mode. Set center frequency to the midpoint between the -26 dB points of the signal. lay mode. Use sample detector mode if bin width (i.e., span/number of points in spectrum) < 0.5 RBW. Otherwise use peak detector mode. Set max hold. Allow max hold to run for 60 seconds. Compute power by integrating the spectrum across the 26 dB EBW or apply a bandwidth correction factor of 10 log(EBW/1 MHz) to the spectral peak of the emission. The integration can be performed using the spectrum analyzer's band power measurement function with band
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2361A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2361A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2361A1.txt
  • calculating the overall equivalent protection margin: 28 dB for co-channel signals; 13.6 dB for adjacent-channel signals; -9.9 dB for second adjacent-channel signals. In Region 2, as a guide for planning, the reduction in the overall C/I ratio due to co-channel interference in the feeder link is taken as equivalent to a degradation in the down-link co-channel C/I ratio of approximately 0.5 dB not exceeded for 99% of the worst month, but the feeder-link and downlink Plans are evaluated on the basis of the overall equivalent protection margin, which includes the combined downlink and feeder-link contributions. In Region 2, an overall equivalent protection margin of 0 dB, or greater, indicates that the individual protection ratios have been met for the co-channel, the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2568A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2568A2.txt
  • benefits. Therestofthepaperisorganizedasfollows.First,weextendRaskovich's (2000)modelandshowthatundermoregeneralassumptionsanequilib- riumstillexists.Next,weshowthattheintroductionofasymmetricbar- gainingpowercanimprovethebuyingfirm'sbargainingposition(evenif thefirmispivotal).Wealsoshowthatinthepresenceofasymmetric bargainingpowerthe`curvaturetest'ofthevaluefunctioncanbeamis- leadingindicatoroftheeffectsofmergeronbargainingposition,i.e.,that thebargainingpositionofthemergedfirmcanimproveevenifthethe valuefunctionisconvex.Finally,wemakesomeconcludingremarks. NashEquilibriumwithBargainingPower Inthissection,weextendRaskovich's(2000)modeltoaccommodateasym- metricbargainingpower.Webeginbyconstructingthetransferprices facedbypivotalandnon-pivotalbuyersandthenshowthatanequilib- riumexistsunderconditionsmoregeneralthanRaskovich's. FollowingRaskovich(2000),weassumetheithbuyer'ssurplusisgiven byvi=(qi,q-i),whilethesupplier'sgrosssurplusequalsV(Q),where Q= ni=1qi.Specifically,V(Q)=A(Q)-C(Q),whereA(Q) ancillary revenue,andC(Q) totalcost.Thesupplierwillproduceiff: V(Q)+ n i=1 Ti 0 (1) 3ForRaskovich(2000), 1= 2= n=12.Infact,Raskovich'spivotalresultwillholdforanyconstantvalue = 1= 2=... nwhere (0,1).Notethat irepresentstheshareofsurpluskeptbybuyeri. 3 Wealsonotethat: q i=argmax x[vi(x,q-i)+V(Q-i+x)] (2) whereweassumethereexistsaq tthatmaximizesjointsurplus.4Buyeri ispivotaliff: V(Q-i)+ j =i Tj<0 (3) and max x[vi(x,q-i)+V(Q-i+x)]+ j =i Tj 0 (4) wherevi(0,q-i)=0.5 Thetransferprice(incorporatingasymmetricbargainingpowerand using notation)becomes,foranon-pivotalbuyer,Ti=(vi+(V-V-i))(1- i)-(V-V-i)whichcanbewrittenas: Ti=vi(1- i)- i(V-V-i) (5) Next,notingthat j =iTj+V-i<0,weseethatthetransferpricefora pivotalbuyercanbewrittenasTi=[vi+( j =iTj+V)](1- i)-V- j =iTj,oras: Ti=vi(1- i)- i( j =i Tj+V) (6) Definition1:ANashEquilibriuminpurchasedquantities(q 1,q 2,...,q n) andtransferprices(T1,...,Tn)isthatforwhichthefollowingholdsimul- taneouslyforalli: q i=argmax x(vi(x,q -i)+V( j =i q j+x)) (7) Ti=vi(x,q -i)(1- i)- i(V(Q )-V(Q -q i)) (8) if j =iTj+V(Q -q i) 0 Ti=vi(x,q -i)(1- i)- i( j =i Tj+V(Q
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2577A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2577A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2577A1.txt
  • relying customer. WorldCom asserts that SBC has not shown that it has experienced any material change in its business circumstances, much less a change that would constitute an injury to SBC that would outweigh the existing customers' legitimate expectations of stability. Moreover, WorldCom states that the increase in uncollectibles is merely the normal effect of the business cycle, constituting only 0.5 percent of SBC's interstate revenues, and with only a negligible effect on SBC's financial performance, which produced an interstate return of 22.4 percent in 2001. Discussion The fourth issue designated for investigation is whether the imposition of revised deposit provisions constitutes a material change to SBC's term contracts, and, if so, whether it is reasonable for SBC to apply the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-265A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-265A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-265A1.txt
  • most recent bidding round plus one minus the weighting factor times the activity index from the prior round. The activity index is then used to calculate a percentage increment by multiplying a minimum percentage increment by one plus the activity index with that result being subject to a maximum percentage increment. The Commission will initially set the weighting factor at 0.5, the minimum percentage increment at 0.1 (10%), and the maximum percentage increment at 0.2 (20%). Equations Ai = (C * Bi) + ( (1-C) * Ai-1) Ii+1 = smaller of ( (1 + Ai) * N) and M X i+1 = Ii+1 * Yi where, Ai = activity index for the current round (round i) C = activity weight factor
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2786A2.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2786A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2786A2.txt
  • of the measurement antenna. Specific information for each component of the measurement system and the equipment used for calibration is presented below in Table 4-1. TABLE 4-1. Test and Calibration Equipment Specifications. EQUIPMENT MANUFACTURER and MODEL RELEVANT SPECIFICATIONS Spectrum Analyzer Agilent E4440A 3 Hz to 26.5 GHz Signal Generator Agilent E4437B 250 kHz to 4 GHz LNA 2 Hewlett-Packard HP83017A 0.5-26.5 GHz Gain = 25 dB (Min) NF = 8 dB (Max) LNA 1 (System A) MITEQ AFS3-01000200-06-10P-6 1.0-2.0 GHz Gain = 45 dB (Min) NF = 0.6 dB (Max) LNA 1 (System B) MITEQ AMF-3B-010020-10-25P 1.0-2.0 GHz Gain = 42 dB (Min) NF = 1.0 dB (Max) Tunable Band Pass Filter Texscan 5VF750/1000-5AA 0.75-1.5 GHz Receive Antenna EMCO 3105 Double
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3176A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3176A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3176A1.txt
  • Boca Raton is based on an erroneous reading of the Commission's Rules. Specifically, it states that the 2 percent interference threshold does not apply to Class A stations. It asserts that Section 73.623(c)(5) of the Commission's Rules provides that a DTV proposal will not be accepted if it is predicted to cause any interference (beyond a permitted rounding tolerance of 0.5 percent) to a Class A station, and that there is no 2 percent exception. See also Establishment of a Class A Television Service, 15 FCC Rcd 6355, 6388 (2000). Accordingly, having concluded that the Boca Raton proposal would cause interference to 1.03 percent of WJAN-CA's service population, Sherjan argues that the allotment of DTV Channel *40 at Boca Raton must
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3215A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3215A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3215A1.txt
  • Joe, Florida, 11 FCC Rcd 1095 (1995). See Huntington Broadcasting Co. v. F.C.C., 192 F.2d 33 (D.C. Cir. 1951); RKO General, Inc. (``KFRC''), 5 FCC Rcd 3222 (1990); and Faye and Richard Tuck (``Tuck''), 3 FCC Rcd 5374 (1988). Our engineering analysis reveals that in addition to plotting clear channel AM facilities, petitioner also considered local AM stations, using the 0.5 mV/m groundwave contour as if they were clear channel stations. In order to consider those AM stations in the petitioner's analysis, they should have been plotted using the Nighttime Interference Free contour (RSS) rather than the 0.5 mV/m groundwave contour. Our analysis did not use any local AM stations, and no clear channel AM stations are impacted by our study.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3234A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3234A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3234A1.txt
  • bids received on the license in that round plus one minus the weighting factor times the activity index from the prior round. The percentage increment is then calculated as the smaller of (a) a minimum percentage increment multiplied by one plus the activity index and (b) a specified maximum percentage increment. The Commission will initially set the weighting factor at 0.5, the minimum percentage increment at 0.1 (10%), and the maximum percentage increment at 0.2 (20%). Hence, at these initial settings, the percentage increment will fluctuate between 10% and 20% depending upon the number of bids for the license. Equations Ai = (C * Bi) + ( (1-C) * Ai-1) Ii+1 = smaller of ( (1 + Ai) * N) and
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3287A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3287A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3287A1.txt
  • most recent bidding round plus one minus the weighting factor times the activity index from the prior round. The activity index is then used to calculate a percentage increment by multiplying a minimum percentage increment by one plus the activity index with that result being subject to a maximum percentage increment. The Commission will initially set the weighting factor at 0.5, the minimum percentage increment at 0.1 (10%), and the maximum percentage increment at 0.2 (20%). Hence, at these initial settings, the percentage increment will fluctuate between 10% and 20% depending upon the number of bids for the license. Equations Ai = (C * Bi) + ( (1-C) * Ai-1) Ii+1 = smaller of ( (1 + Ai) * N) and
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-470A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-470A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-470A1.txt
  • value based on the bidding activity on that license. This methodology allows the increments to be tailored to the activity level of a license, decreasing the time it takes for active licenses to reach their final value. The formula used to calculate this increment is included as Attachment F. We adopt our proposal of initially setting the weighing factor at 0.5, the minimum percentage increment at 0.1 (10 percent), and the maximum at 0.2 (20 percent). The Bureau retains the discretion to change the minimum acceptable bids and bid increments if it determines that circumstance so dictate. The Bureau will do so by announcement in the Automated Auction System. Under its discretion, the Bureau may also implement an absolute dollar floor
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-563A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-563A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-563A1.txt
  • value based on the bidding activity on that license. This methodology allows the increments to be tailored to the activity level of a license, decreasing the time it takes for active licenses to reach their final value. The formula used to calculate this increment is included as Attachment F. We adopt our proposal of initially setting the weighing factor at 0.5, the minimum percentage increment at 0.1 (10 percent), and the maximum at 0.2 (20 percent). The Bureau retains the discretion to change the minimum acceptable bids and bid increments if it determines that circumstance so dictate. The Bureau will do so by announcement in the Automated Auction System. Under its discretion, the Bureau may also implement an absolute dollar floor
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-893A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-893A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-893A1.txt
  • A stations. Marksteiner claims the proposed channel substitution will not cause impermissible interference to any authorized television station. Marksteiner argues that the Longley-Rice terrain dependent propagation methods outlined in OET Bulletin 69 establish that WPPB operating on DTV Channel *40 would cause predicted interference to only 0.03% of station WJAN-CA's service area, well within the ``service population'' rounding tolerance of 0.5 percent. Moreover, Marksteiner states that the OET Bulletin 69 techniques establish that the proposed reallotment would not cause any predicted interference to station WFUN-LP or any other Class A or Class A-eligible station. 5. Discussion. We have reviewed all of the pleadings and engineering submissions before us and, for the reasons that follow, we find that the public interest will
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2354A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2354A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2354A1.txt
  • minimum percentage based on the bidding activity on that license. This methodology allows the increments to be tailored to the activity on a license, decreasing the time it takes for licenses receiving many bids to reach their final prices. The formula used to calculate this increment is included as Attachment F. We proposed to initially set the weighting factor at 0.5, the minimum percentage increment at 0.1 (10%), and the maximum percentage increment at 0.2 (20%). Hence, at these initial settings, the percentage increment will fluctuate between 10% and 20% depending upon the number of bids for the license. We further proposed to retain the discretion to change the minimum acceptable bids and bid increments if circumstances so dictate. We received
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2738A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2738A2.txt
  • Modifications to MSM Inputs are Highlighted in Gray Throughout this Appendix G Cluster Inputs Values Description Comments 150 Raster_Size 12000 Distance_Limit 1800 Line_Limit 90 Line_Fill 113 Block_Divide_Factor 1 Cluster_Algorithm 4 Optimization_Method 1000 Maximum_populated_cells 1 Use_hcpm.mdb 1 True-up_line_counts Federal Communications Commission DA 03-2738 APPENDIX G MSM Loop Input Modifications ­ HCPM Inputs 15 Feeder / Distribution Inputs Value Variable Name Comments 0.5 max_drop_length 0.5 user_lambda 12 copper_gauge_xover 12 max_copper_distance 1.25 MaxCopperPenalty 12 copper_t1_xover 0 t1_fiber_xover 1.25 t1_redundancy_factor 24 copper_placement_depth 36 fiber_placement_depth 3 CriticalWaterDepth 1.3 WaterFactor 12 MinSlopeTrigger 1.10 MinSlopeFactor 30 MaxSlopeTrigger 1.05 MaxSlopeFactor 1.20 CombSlopeFactor 0.0000% pct_ds1 0.00% pct_lsa 24 ChannelsPerT1System 2 PairsPerT1System 4 FibersPerTerminal 2016 CapacityF2016 1344 CapacityF1344 672 CapacityF672 96 CapacityF96 24 CapacityF24 96 CapacityT96 24 CapacityT24 10 lines_per_bus 1.00
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-286A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-286A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-286A1.txt
  • most recent bidding round plus one minus the weighting factor times the activity index from the prior round. The activity index is then used to calculate a percentage increment by multiplying a minimum percentage increment by one plus the activity index with that result being subject to a maximum percentage increment. The Commission will initially set the weighting factor at 0.5, the minimum percentage increment at 0.1 (10%), and the maximum percentage increment at 0.2 (20%). Hence, at these initial settings, the percentage increment will fluctuate between 10% and 20% depending upon the number of bids for the license. Equations Ai = (C * Bi) + ( (1-C) * Ai-1) Ii+1 = smaller of ( (1 + Ai) * N) and
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2897A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2897A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2897A1.txt
  • most recent bidding round plus one minus the weighting factor times the activity index from the prior round. The activity index is then used to calculate a percentage increment by multiplying a minimum percentage increment by one plus the activity index with that result being subject to a maximum percentage increment. The Commission will initially set the weighting factor at 0.5, the minimum percentage increment at 0.1 (10%), and the maximum percentage increment at 0.2 (20%). Hence, at these initial settings, the percentage increment will fluctuate between 10% and 20% depending upon the number of bids for the license. Equations Ai = (C * Bi) + ( (1-C) * Ai-1) Ii+1 = smaller of ( (1 + Ai) * N) and
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3235A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3235A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3235A1.txt
  • minimum percentage based on the bidding activity on that license. This methodology allows the increments to be tailored to the activity on a license, decreasing the time it takes for licenses receiving many bids to reach their final prices. The formula used to calculate this increment is included as Attachment F. We proposed to initially set the weighting factor at 0.5, the minimum percentage increment at 0.1 (10%), and the maximum percentage increment at 0.2 (20%). Hence, at these initial settings, the percentage increment will fluctuate between 10% and 20% depending upon the number of bids for the license. We further proposed to retain the discretion to change the minimum acceptable bids and bid increments if circumstances so dictate. We received
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-345A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-345A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-345A1.txt
  • and are similarly imprecise. In the initial Petition, Holland does not assert that KBMW(AM) or its current owner participates in the Fargo metro. In rebuttal to Triad's Opposition, Holland argues that the ``fact that [KBMW(AM)] is not rated . . . does not mean that [it] is not included in the Arbitron market for Fargo/Moorhead.'' Holland further asserts that KBMW(AM)'s 0.5 mV/m contour ``reaches far beyond'' the cities of Fargo and Moorhead and that the station ``has carried advertising for at least a half-dozen business enterprises that have their principal business locations in Fargo/Moorhead.'' Holland thus claims that KBMW(AM) derives advertising revenue from the ``Fargo-Moorhead radio market'' and functions ``as an element of'' that market. According to Holland, these facts support
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-372A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-372A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-372A1.txt
  • most recent bidding round plus one minus the weighting factor times the activity index from the prior round. The activity index is then used to calculate a percentage increment by multiplying a minimum percentage increment by one plus the activity index with that result being subject to a maximum percentage increment. The Commission will initially set the weighting factor at 0.5, the minimum percentage increment at 0.1 (10%), and the maximum percentage increment at 0.2 (20%). Equations Ai = (C * Bi) + ( (1-C) * Ai-1) Ii+1 = smaller of ( (1 + Ai) * N) and M X i+1 = Ii+1 * Yi where, Ai = activity index for the current round (round i) C = activity weight factor
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-445A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-445A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-445A1.txt
  • COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Andrew S. Fishel Managing Director APPENDIX For the reasons set forth in the preamble, the Federal Communications Commission amends 47 CFR part 0 as follows: PART 0 - COMMISSION ORGANIZATION 1. The authority citation for part 0 continues to read as follows: Authority: Secs. 5, 48 Stat. 1068, as amended; 47 U.S.C. 155, 225, unless otherwise noted. §§ 0.5, 0.21, 0.31, and 0.271 [Amended] 2. In part 0 remove the words ``Office of Plans and Policy'' and add, in their place, the words ``Office of Strategic Planning and Policy Analysis'' in the following places: a. Center heading before §§0.21 and 0.271; b. Section 0.5(a)(4); c. Section 0.21 introductory text; d. Section 0.31(g); and e. Section 0.271(a). (...continued from previous
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-567A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-567A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-567A1.txt
  • most recent bidding round plus one minus the weighting factor times the activity index from the prior round. The activity index is then used to calculate a percentage increment by multiplying a minimum percentage increment by one plus the activity index with that result being subject to a maximum percentage increment. The Commission will initially set the weighting factor at 0.5, the minimum percentage increment at 0.1 (10%), and the maximum percentage increment at 0.2 (20%). Equations Ai = (C * Bi) + ( (1-C) * Ai-1) Ii+1 = smaller of ( (1 + Ai) * N) and M X i+1 = Ii+1 * Yi where, Ai = activity index for the current round (round i) C = activity weight factor
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-631A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-631A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-631A1.txt
  • A. Dupont, (202) 418-7072. B. MM Docket No. 01-188; RM-10203 Action: At the request of Charles Crawford, we are allotting Channel 243A at Evant, Texas, as the community's first local aural transmission service. Coordinates: The reference coordinates for Channel 243A at Evant are 31-28-56 NL and 98-09-19 West Longitude. Additional Information: This allotment requires a site restriction of 0.8 km (0.5 miles) north of Wapanucka at the coordinates indicated above. FCC Contact: Deborah A. Dupont, (202) 418-7072. C. MM Docket No. 01-190; RM-10210 Action: At the request of Jeraldine Anderson, we are allotting Channel 280A at Comanche, Texas, as the community's second local FM transmission service. Coordinates: The reference coordinates for Channel 280A at Comanche are 31-53-50 NL and 98-36-12 West
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-744A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-744A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-744A1.txt
  • channel 46, if allotted. Pappas states that Montgomery's application is part of a mutually exclusive group that is slated for auction at some time in the unknown future. Although, Pappas characterized Montgomery's concerns as speculative, it submitted an engineering analysis demonstrating that a maximized DTV channel 46 at Derby, at the maximum tower of 372.61 meters would cause less than 0.5 % interference to Montgomery's pending application. Finally, Pappas maintains that the proposed DTV channel 46 facility will comply with all applicable technical and spacing requirements while permitting the implementation of the first local television service at Derby, Kansas. 4. We believe the public interest would be served by allotting DTV channel 46 to Derby, Kansas, since it would provide the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1513A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1513A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1513A1.txt
  • minimum percentage based on the bidding activity on that license. This methodology allows the increments to be tailored to the activity on a license, decreasing the time it takes for licenses receiving many bids to reach their final prices. The formula used to calculate this increment is included as Attachment F. We proposed to initially set the weighting factor at 0.5, the minimum percentage increment at 0.1 (10%), and the maximum percentage increment at 0.2 (20%). Hence, at these initial settings, the percentage increment will fluctuate between 10% and 20% depending upon the number of bids for the license. We further proposed to retain the discretion to change the minimum acceptable bids and bid increments if circumstances so dictate. We received
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1639A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1639A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1639A1.txt
  • most recent bidding round plus one minus the weighting factor times the activity index from the prior round. The activity index is then used to calculate a percentage increment by multiplying a minimum percentage increment by one plus the activity index with that result being subject to a maximum percentage increment. The Commission will initially set the weighting factor at 0.5, the minimum percentage increment at 0.1 (10%), and the maximum percentage increment at 0.3 (30%). Hence, at these initial settings, the percentage increment will fluctuate between 10% and 30% depending upon the number of bids for the license. Equations Ai = (C * Bi) + ( (1-C) * Ai-1) Ii+1 = smaller of ( (1 + Ai) * N) and
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1639A1_Erratum.doc
  • most recent bidding round plus one minus the weighting factor times the activity index from the prior round. The activity index is then used to calculate a percentage increment by multiplying a minimum percentage increment by one plus the activity index with that result being subject to a maximum percentage increment. The Commission will initially set the weighting factor at 0.5, the minimum percentage increment at 0.1 (10%), and the maximum percentage increment at 0.3 (30%). Hence, at these initial settings, the percentage increment will fluctuate between 10% and 30% depending upon the number of bids for the license. Equations Ai = (C * Bi) + ( (1-C) * Ai-1) Ii+1 = smaller of ( (1 + Ai) * N) and
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1746A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1746A1.txt
  • GHz, 11.45-11.7GHz, 13.75-14.25 GHz frequency bands with +/-.05° longitudinal station-keeping. Page 2 of 4 PanAmSat Licensee Corp. S2381 SAT-MOD-20040405-00079E Effective Date: 06/15/2004 Grant of Authority 09/22/2017 - Modification Nature of Service:Fixed Satellite Service Granted with conditions PanAmSat Licensee Corp.'s application to operate GALAXY 3C at 95.05°W.L. in the 3700-4200 MHz, 5925-6425 MHz, 6425-6675 MHz, 11.45-12.2 GHz, 13.75-14.5 GHz with +/- 0.5° longitudinal station-keeping. HISPAMAR SATELLITES,S.A. S2622 SAT-PPL-20040402-00073E Effective Date: 06/15/2004 Grant of Authority Petition for Declaratory Ruling to be Added to the Permitted List Nature of Service:Fixed Satellite Service Conditions of Permitted List Action June 15, 2004 1. Pursuant to Sections 303(r), 308, 309, and 310 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 303(r), 308, 309, 310,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1844A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1844A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1844A1.txt
  • sometimes that a single company might offer different packages of services using the same type of customer antennas. For these reasons, the FCC's OTARD protections apply regardless of whether the fixed wireless signals are delivered on a licensed or unlicensed basis. This action is taken under delegated authority pursuant to Section 5(c) of the Communications Act of 1934, and Sections 0.5(c), 0.31, 0.204, 0.241 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.5(c), 0.31, 0.2.04, 0.241. Office of Engineering and Technology contact: James Miller, (202) 418-7351, e-mail James.Miller@FCC.gov. - Communications Act of 1934, 47 U.S.C. § 1 et. seq. (all citations to the U.S. Code) (Act). 47 U.S.C. §§ 301, 303(f) (2004). 47 U.S.C. § 302a(a)(1) (2004). See H.R. Report No. 765,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-196A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-196A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-196A1.txt
  • most recent bidding round plus one minus the weighting factor times the activity index from the prior round. The activity index is then used to calculate a percentage increment by multiplying a minimum percentage increment by one plus the activity index with that result being subject to a maximum percentage increment. The Commission will initially set the weighting factor at 0.5, the minimum percentage increment at 0.1 (10%), and the maximum percentage increment at 0.2 (20%). Hence, at these initial settings, the percentage increment will fluctuate between 10% and 20% depending upon the number of bids for the license. Equations Ai = (C * Bi) + ( (1-C) * Ai-1) Ii+1 = smaller of ( (1 + Ai) * N) and
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3005A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3005A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3005A1.txt
  • minimum percentage based on the bidding activity on that license. This methodology allows the increments to be tailored to the activity on a license, decreasing the time it takes for licenses receiving many bids to reach their final prices. The formula used to calculate this increment is included as Attachment F. We proposed to initially set the weighting factor at 0.5, the minimum percentage increment at 0.1 (10%), and the maximum percentage increment at 0.3 (30%). Hence, at these initial settings, the percentage increment will fluctuate between 10% and 30% depending upon the number of bids for the license. We further proposed to retain the discretion to change the minimum acceptable bids and bid increments if circumstances so dictate. We received
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3267A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3267A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3267A1.txt
  • inter-governmental coordination. Uniradio asserted that, under the circumstances, any enforcement action by the Commission, including revocation of its Section 325(c) permit, is not warranted. On March 26, 2004, NIBC filed a reply to Uniradio's response. NIBC maintained, and provided evidence, that Station XEMO's operations at its current antenna site has created further overlap of its contour to Station KLRA(AM)'s protected 0.5 mV/m contour. NIBC further maintained that, due to the increased overlap, Station XEMO's utilization of a narrow bandwidth and reduction to a power level of 5 kW have not proven effective in redressing the continuing substantial interference to Station KRLA(AM). Finally, NIBC maintained that Uniradio knew or should have known that Station XEMO's operations at its current site had not
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3553A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3553A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3553A1.txt
  • power rises above -3.5 dBW and would not reduce either the duty cycle or the vocoder rate to any further extent at higher amplifier-output levels. The shift to half-rate duty cycle will reduce effective peak EIRP by 3 dB. MSV maintains that the concurrent reduction of the vocoder data transmission rate will further reduce the effective peak EIRP by another 0.5 dB, for a total reduction of 3.5 dB. MSV requests waiver of Section 25.253(a)(2) as necessary to permit operation in this manner. Inmarsat contends that the vocoder-rate/duty-cycle schedule proposed in MSV's application would not reduce effective mobile-terminal EIRP to the same extent as the schedule prescribed in Section 25.253(a)(2). On the contrary, Inmarsat maintains that, with the user distribution assumed
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-35A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-35A2.txt
  • or transaction that is unusual in nature. Enter total programming expenses for all video programming services Enter total programming expenses for BST and CPST1 tiers only Enter programming expenses for sports networks on BST and CPST1 only In Dollars: Total operating revenues F. Number of Channels, Jan. 1, 1004 Number of other analog channels (pay, premium, and all other) Reportthenumberoflocalbroadcast,PEG,andlocalleasedaccessstations,bytier.Forotherlocal,regional,ornationalTV channelslisted,enter1forfull-time,0.5forhalf-time,andthenumberofchannelsallocatedtomultiplexservicesormoviegroups (e.g.,enter2ifyoucarry2Showtimechannels).Ifyoudonotcarrythechannel,leaveblank.Ifyoucarryachannelbutcannot locatealistingforthatchannel,enterthenameintheblankspacesprovidedattheendofthisSection.Addlinesifnecessary. Totals are calculated, below, and should match entries made for Jan 1, 2004 in questions 47-54. Number of channels on most highly-subscribed digital tier Other digital channels (pay, premium, and other digital tiers) Total number of digital channels (52 + 53) Channel Lineup, Jan. 1, 2004 Includerevenuefromallservices:analoganddigitalprogramming(i.e.,allprogrammingtiers,pay,andpremiumchannels), serviceinstallation,advertising,leaseorsaleofstudiotimeorothercablefacilities,equipmentrentals,Internetaccess,telephony, and other services associated with the cable system. Do not
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3913A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3913A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3913A1.txt
  • and PMCC proceed to competitive bidding. Background. In a staff decision dated March 27, 2002 (``Staff Decision''), we found a dispositive preference under Section 307(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, for TELNS's major modification application over both Ingles's and PMCC's proposals for new AM stations. Specifically, we determined that TELNS proposed to serve 1,739,548 persons within its 0.5 mV/m contour (after deducting the population that would lose KGYN service at Guymon), and 1,627,372 persons within its 2 mV/m contour. In comparison, we found that Ingles would have provided 0.5 mV/m service to 1,213,670 persons and 2 mV/m service to 936,885 persons under her proposal. We found this difference to be dispositive. The PMCC proposal would have resulted in
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3922A2.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3922A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3922A2.txt
  • FAIRBANKS KTVF 49621 11 50.1 00001 0645036.0 26 12. 00001 0645036.0 81588 4984.5 81247 3841.9 01474248.0 01474248.0 AK FAIRBANKS KUAC-DT 69315 09 46.8 00163 0645442.0 24 79 152 645442.0 82767 14213.9 82102 6701.0 01474638.0 1474638.0 AK JUNEAU KJUD-DT 13814 08 0.204 00001 05818 6.0 11 3 33 5818 6.0 13599 344.4 30759 5513.4 01342629.0 1342629.0 AK JUNEAU KTOO-TV 8651 03 0.5 00001 05818 4.0 10 0.748 00001 05818 4.0 29798 1113.3 30441 3982.9 01342521.0 01342521.0 AK KETCHIKAN KUBD 60520 04 0.955 00001 0552059.0 13 3.2 00001 0552059.0 13997 630.5 15441 4355.1 01314012.0 01314012.0 AK NORTH POLE KJNP-TV 20015 04 19.1 00485 0645244.0 20 0.081 00005 0644532.0 84347 30901.4 31029 1016.1 01480310.0 01471926.0 AK SITKA KTNL 60519 13 0.2 00001 0570327.0 02
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-633A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-633A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-633A1.txt
  • minimum percentage based on the bidding activity on that license. This methodology allows the increments to be tailored to the activity on a license, decreasing the time it takes for licenses receiving many bids to reach their final prices. The formula used to calculate this increment is included as Attachment F. We proposed to initially set the weighting factor at 0.5, the minimum percentage increment at 0.1 (10%), and the maximum percentage increment at 0.2 (20%). Hence, at these initial settings, the percentage increment will fluctuate between 10% and 20% depending upon the number of bids for the license. We further proposed to retain the discretion to change the minimum acceptable bids and bid increments if circumstances so dictate. We received
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-954A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-954A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-954A1.txt
  • most recent bidding round plus one minus the weighting factor times the activity index from the prior round. The activity index is then used to calculate a percentage increment by multiplying a minimum percentage increment by one plus the activity index with that result being subject to a maximum percentage increment. The Commission will initially set the weighting factor at 0.5, the minimum percentage increment at 0.1 (10%), and the maximum percentage increment at 0.2 (20%). Hence, at these initial settings, the percentage increment will fluctuate between 10% and 20% depending upon the number of bids for the license. Equations Ai = (C * Bi) + ((1-C) * Ai-1) Ii+1 = smaller of ((1 + Ai) * N) and M X
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1016A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1016A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1016A1.txt
  • power increases that merely compensate for rain fade will have no net effect on operation of co-frequency satellites. Power-Control Error Boeing asserted in supplemental comments, without specific elaboration, that ARINC had not adequately accounted for the effect of errors in closed-loop power control on AES e.i.r.p. ARINC later reported that it had allowed for a power-control error factor of ± 0.5 dB in its simulation-based uplink interference analysis. The error allowance is plausible, and Boeing did not dispute it in subsequent pleadings. We therefore conclude that ARINC has sufficiently addressed Boeing's concern in this regard. Calibration Error ARINC said in the application that it would use a reference transmitter co-located with the hub earth station, generating a waveform identical to the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1185A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1185A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1185A1.txt
  • 1999, and granted October 31, 2000. 4. In rebuttal, Green Bay states that the alleged interference to the maximized facilities of station WISC-DT, can be reduced by lowering the ERP of the proposed facility at Green Bay and rotating the station's directional antenna pattern. Green Bay claims this would reduce the interference to WISC-DT to 0.483%, which is within the 0.5 % rounding tolerance. Further, Green Bay states that the city-grade, Grade A and Grade B contours, as revealed in its engineering studies, demonstrate that the power reduction and rotated directional antenna pattern will not have a negative impact on Green Bay's ability to serve the community of Green Bay. 5. We believe the public interest would be served by adopting
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1496A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1496A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1496A1.txt
  • should be even more precise and consider more alternative population studies, with various cells sizes smaller than the default values, to establish an even more refined analysis to determine the true impact of the rulemaking proposal. It therefore submits analyses of 14 different cell sizes and, using updated 2000 census population figures, concludes that interference to WJAN-CA is less than 0.5 percent in only two out of 14 cases (at 1 km and 1.8 km) and exceeds that figure in every other case. Sherjan argues that the staff acted arbitrarily and capriciously by allowing the proponents to rely on a non-standard cell size and then select a convenient cell size to yield the desired result. Moreover, it states that it has
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1604A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1604A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1604A1.txt
  • listed in Attachment 84-MX proposing to serve different communities, a Section 307(b) analysis is required. In order to evaluate the Section 307(b) considerations, each applicant within a mutually exclusive group consisting of proposals to serve different communities must submit by September 16, 2005, an amendment which includes the following: (1) the area and population within the proposed 2 mV/m and 0.5 mV/m daytime contours, and the nighttime interference-free contour (if fulltime operation is proposed); (2) the number of stations licensed to the proposed community of license; (3) the number of stations providing protected service to the proposed community of license; (4) the population (according to the latest Census data) of the proposed community of license; (5) where relevant to establish the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2423A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2423A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2423A1.txt
  • most recent bidding round plus one minus the weighting factor times the activity index from the prior round. The activity index is then used to calculate a percentage increment by multiplying a minimum percentage increment by one plus the activity index with that result being subject to a maximum percentage increment. The Commission will initially set the weighting factor at 0.5, the minimum percentage increment at 0.1 (10%), and the maximum percentage increment at 0.2 (20%). Hence, at these initial settings, the percentage increment will fluctuate between 10% and 20% depending upon the number of bids for the construction permit. Smoothing formula equations and examples are shown in Attachment C. In the case of a construction permit for which the provisionally
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2693A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2693A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2693A1.txt
  • 91-92 (1982). The FM allotment priorities are the following: (1) First full-time aural service; (2) Second full-time aural service; (3) First local service; and (4) Other public interest matters. Equal weight is given to priorities (2) and (3). If this proposal is adopted, Rockmart will continue to be served by Station WZOT(AM), Rockmart, Georgia. Station WTSH-FM currently provides service to 0.5 percent of the Atlanta, Georgia, Urbanized Area. That coverage would increase to 5.6 percent, if WWB's proposal is adopted. See Faye and Richard Tuck, 3 FCC Rcd 5374 (1988). See note 5, supra. The reference coordinates for Station WSKZ(FM) will not change following its downgrade to Class C0. See 47 C.F.R. §§1.415 and 1.419. See Certification that Section 603 and
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2900A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2900A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2900A1.txt
  • did not provide a demonstration under Section 25.222(b)(1), (2), or (3) which demonstrates that its ESV meets these off-axis limits. In addition, Section 25.222(a)(7) indicates that all emissions from an ESV shall automatically cease within 100 milliseconds if the angle between the orbital location of the target satellite and the axis of the main lobe of the ESV antenna exceeds 0.5 degree, and transmission will not resume until such angle is less than 0.2 degree. C5 Communications did not provide any demonstration that the operation will comply with this requirement. Moreover, the application indicates that the ESV's receive frequencies are in the 10.95-12.75 GHz band. The Commission's ESV rules only permit receive operations in the 10.95-11.2, 11.45-11.7, 11.7-12.2 GHz bands. Furthermore,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2987A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2987A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2987A1.txt
  • most recent bidding round plus one minus the weighting factor times the activity index from the prior round. The activity index is then used to calculate a percentage increment by multiplying a minimum percentage increment by one plus the activity index with that result being subject to a maximum percentage increment. We proposed to initially set the weighting factor at 0.5, the minimum percentage increment at 0.1 (10%), and the maximum percentage increment at 0.2 (20%). Hence, at these initial settings, the percentage increment will fluctuate between 10% and 20% depending upon the number of bids for the construction permit. We will round the result using our standard rounding procedures. The minimum acceptable bid amount for a construction permit will be
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3102A2.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3102A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3102A2.txt
  • Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs), and an email link to the contractor as well as contact information (including telephone numbers) for all appropriate staff members. Availability and Access The web site shall be available 24 hours per day, 7 days a week. The web site shall be able to support up to 600 simultaneous users with an average holding time of 0.5 hours. System Responsiveness Rapid response shall be required when accessing the web site. The contractor shall provide a system such that a 56 KBPS modem-equipped user will be able to view the complete home page in less than 8 seconds 95% of the time over any 12 month period. If a user is experiencing greater than 12 seconds to view
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3189A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3189A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3189A1.txt
  • 47 C.F.R. §25.112(a)(1), we dismiss the application as defective. We note that on FCC Form 312 Schedule B, the application indicates that the Maximum EIRP Density per Carrier is 45.40 dBW/4 kHz for emission designator 36M0F9F and the Maximum Transmit Antenna Gain is 45.9 dBi. Using this information, we compute a maximum input power density into the antenna flange of -0.5 dBW/4 kHz. This exceeds the -2.7 dBW/4kHz level eligible for routine processing in 47 C.F.R. §25.212(d)(2). Earth stations operating at non-routine power levels must include the certifications as described in Section 25.220(e)(1) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §25.220(e)(1) and must identify the specific satellites for which the earth station intends to communicate. Finally, in items E57 and E59 of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3291A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3291A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3291A1.txt
  • engineering, construction and launch of the next generation of imagery satellites. In September 2003, NGA awarded a contract to DigitalGlobe, and in September 2004, NGA awarded a contract to ORBIMAGE in its NextView Second Vendor program. Space Imaging was not awarded a NextView contact. The satellites that will be put into service with this program will have a higher resolution, 0.5 meters or better, than earlier satellites. Without additional funding from its owners, and without a NextView contract, it is unlikely that Space Imaging would continue operations after its IKONOS satellite ceases operation. Since Space Imaging is unlikely to continue operations after first quarter 2008, and would be unable with its IKONOS satellite to provide the 0.5 meter resolution of the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-390A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-390A2.txt
  • Radio & Television (ART) Arizona Capitol Television Arizona News Channel Arts & Entertainment (A&E) Local, Regional & National: B Basic and Expanded Basic Other Analog Channels Digital Tier HDTV ChannelsOther Digital Channels Bay News 9 Bay News 9 Espanol Bay News 9 Weather Now BBC America BET BET Gospel BET Jazz Reportthenumberoflocalbroadcaststations,PEG,andleasedaccesschannelsyoucarry,butdonotlistindividually.Report individuallyothernetworksyoucarryaccordingtothe5categoriesarrangedinColumnsB-F:(B)basic&expandedbasic(see Question41);(C)otheranalog(includingpremium,pay-per-view,ormini-tier);(D)digitaltier(Question51);(E)HDTV (includingbroadcast,premium,pay-per-view,andother);and(F)otherdigital(including,premium,pay-per-viewincludingvideoon demand,andothersnotreportedinColumnD).Forexample,ifyoucarry10broadcaststationsonbasicandthesame10inHD format,enter10inbothColumnsBandEnextto"Localbroadcaststations"inColumnA.Blankrowsareprovidedattheendofthe list.Ifyoucarryachannelbutcannotfinditlisted,enterthenameandnumberofchannelsononeoftheseblankrows.Enter1for full-time and 0.5 for half-time channels. Do not report audio-music channels. Questions66through70refertoone-timeserviceinstallationcharges.Ifinstallationiffreeofcharge,enter0.Inadditiontothe fixedcharge,ifanhourlychargetypicallyappliesinlieuoforinaddition,reportthetotalchargebasedonthefixedchargeplus estimated work time. G. Channel Lineup at the Community Level, as of January 1, 2005 66. Charge for unwired home installation 67. Charge for pre-wired home installation 69. Charge to install/configure a CableCARD, existing cable subscriber 70. Charge to install/configure a CableCARD, new cable subscriber 68. Charge for reconnection of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-605A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-605A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-605A1.txt
  • up to a value of 1.0. Protection to the authorized facilities of DTV broadcast stations shall be based on not causing predicted interference to the population within the service area defined and described in 47 C.F.R. § 73.622(e) of this chapter, except that a digital low power TV or TV translator station must not cause a loss of service to 0.5 percent or more of the population predicted to receive service from the authorized DTV facilities. Protection to the authorized facilities of TV broadcast stations shall be based on not causing predicted interference to the population within the Grade B field strength contours defined and described in 47 C.F.R. § 73.683 except that a digital low power TV or TV translator
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1016A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1016A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1016A1.txt
  • from the prior round. The additional percentage is determined as one plus the activity index times a minimum percentage amount, with the result not to exceed a given maximum. The additional percentage is then multiplied by the provisionally winning bid amount to obtain the minimum acceptable bid for the next round. The Commission will initially set the weighting factor at 0.5, the minimum percentage at 0.1 (10%), and the maximum percentage at 0.2 (20%). Hence, at these initial settings, the minimum acceptable bid for a license will be between 10% and 20% higher than the provisionally winning bid, depending upon the bidding activity for the license. Equations and examples are shown in Attachment B. The eight additional bid amounts are calculated
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1093A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1093A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1093A1.txt
  • EIRP density reduced by the number of co-frequency simultaneously transmitting remote earth stations in the same satellite receiving beam under Routine licensing; (7) Non-Routinely sized antenna off-axis antenna Gain (dBi); and (8) maximum off-axis EIRP density of non-routinely sized antenna (dBW/4 kHz). We also recommend stating the Theta in increments of 0.1 from 1 degree to 3 degrees; increments of 0.5 from 3 degrees to 7 degrees; increments of 5 degrees from 7 degrees to 9.2 degrees and from 9.2 degrees to 48 degrees; and at increments of 20 from 48 degrees to 180 degrees. 47 C.F.R. § 25.112(a)(1). See also Echostar Satellite LLC, Order on Reconsideration, DA 04-4056 (released December 27, 2004). Federal Communications Commission DA 06-1093 Federal Communications Commission
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1272A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1272A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1272A1.txt
  • the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 is attached. By the Deputy Chief, Office of Engineering and Technology By the Acting Chief, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau -FCC- ATTACHMENT FCC NOTICE REQUIRED BY THE PAPERWORK REDUCTION ACT OF 1995 The total annual reporting burden for this information collection including the time for gathering and maintaining the collection of information, is estimated to be 0.5 hours to 1.25 hours. If you have any comments on these burden estimates, or how we can improve the collection and reduce any burdens it causes you, please send an email to the Federal Communications Commission, PRA@fcc.gov. Please include the appropriate OMB Control Number (see below) in your correspondence. Under 5 C.F.R. § 1320, you are not required to respond
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-129A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-129A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-129A1.txt
  • operations do not comply with Commission rules for the following reasons: the proposed ESV emissions exceed the off-axis EIRP density limits in Section 25.222(a)(1) and (2); and second, the time required for the ESV to cease emissions if the angle between the orbital location of the target satellite and the axis of the main lobe of the ESV antenna exceeds 0.5 degrees does not comply with the limit in Section 25.222(a)(7). To operate in compliance with Commission rules, the maximum input power density into the ESV's antenna flange should be -21 dBW/4 kHz. Furthermore, if a mispointing of the antenna is greater than 0.5 degrees, C5 must be able to detect and cease ESV transmissions within 100 milliseconds. Sincerely, Scott A.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1910A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1910A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1910A1.txt
  • III. DISCUSSION In this instant Petition, SBE objects to language in footnote 43 in paragraph 17 of the AWS Fourth MO&O, which SBE views as abandoning a requirement from the AWS Seventh R&O that prospective DOD TT&C earth stations demonstrate protection to incumbent BAS electronic newsgathering (ENG) mobile TV Pick-up (TVPU) facilities by a stringent receiver threshold degradation not exceeding 0.5 dB. The language at issue is the last sentence in footnote 43, which reads as follows: ``... Finally, the Commission noted that, during on-going coordination, receiver threshold degradation, on which this worst case analysis was based, may be supplanted by less stringent criteria which fully consider actual ENG power, modulation, performance, or other requirements.'' SBE asserts that a 0.5 dB
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2014A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2014A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2014A1.txt
  • from the prior round. The additional percentage is determined as one plus the activity index times a minimum percentage amount, with the result not to exceed a given maximum. The additional percentage is then multiplied by the provisionally winning bid amount to obtain the minimum acceptable bid for the next round. The Commission will initially set the weighting factor at 0.5, the minimum percentage at 0.1 (10%), and the maximum percentage at 0.2 (20%). Hence, at these initial settings, the minimum acceptable bid for a license will be between 10% and 20% higher than the provisionally winning bid, depending upon the bidding activity for the license. Equations and examples are shown in Attachment E. The eight additional bid amounts are calculated
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2298A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2298A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2298A1.txt
  • from the prior round. The additional percentage is determined as one plus the activity index times a minimum percentage amount, with the result not to exceed a given maximum. The additional percentage is then multiplied by the provisionally winning bid amount to obtain the minimum acceptable bid for the next round. The Commission will initially set the weighting factor at 0.5, the minimum percentage at 0.1 (10%), and the maximum percentage at 0.2 (20%). Hence, at these initial settings, the minimum acceptable bid for a license will be between ten percent and twenty percent higher than the provisionally winning bid, depending upon the bidding activity for the license. Equations and examples are shown in Attachment B. The eight additional bid amounts
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2298A5.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2298A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2298A5.txt
  • the current round (round i) Ai-1 = activity index from previous round (round i-1), A0 is 0 Ii+1 = additional percentage for the next round (round i+1) N = minimum additional percentage or floor M = maximum additional percentage or ceiling X i+1 = additional dollar amount Yi = provisionally winning bid amount from the current round Examples License 1 C=0.5, N = 0.1, M = 0.2 Round 1 (2 bidders submitting bids, provisionally winning bid = $1,000,000) 1. Calculation of additional percentage for round 2: A1 = (0.5 * 2) + (0.5 * 0) = 1 I2 = The smaller of ((1 + 1) * 0.1) = 0.2 or 0.2 (the maximum additional percentage) 2. Calculation of dollar amount associated
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-238A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-238A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-238A1.txt
  • most recent bidding round plus one minus the weighting factor times the activity index from the prior round. The activity index is then used to calculate a percentage increment by multiplying a minimum percentage increment by one plus the activity index with that result being subject to a maximum percentage increment. The Commission will initially set the weighting factor at 0.5, the minimum percentage increment at 0.1 (10%), and the maximum percentage increment at 0.2 (20%). Hence, at these initial settings, the percentage increment will fluctuate between 10% and 20% depending upon the number of bids for the license. Equations and examples are shown in Attachment C. In the case of a license for which the provisionally winning bid has been
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-238A4.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-238A4.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-238A4.txt
  • index from previous round (round i-1), A0 is 0 Ii+1 = percentage increment for the next round (round i+1) N = minimum percentage increment or percentage increment floor M = maximum percentage increment or percentage increment ceiling X i+1 = dollar amount associated with the percentage increment Yi = provisionally winning bid amount from the current round Examples License 1 C=0.5, N = 0.1, M = 0.2 Round 1 (2 bidders submitting bids, provisionally winning bid = $1,000,000) 1. Calculation of percentage increment for round 2 using the smoothing formula: A1 = (0.5 * 2) + (0.5 * 0) = 1 I2 = The smaller of ((1 + 1) * 0.1) = 0.2 or 0.2 (the maximum percentage increment) 2. Calculation
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2437A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2437A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2437A1.txt
  • from the prior round. The additional percentage is determined as one plus the activity index times a minimum percentage amount, with the result not to exceed a given maximum. The additional percentage is then multiplied by the provisionally winning bid amount to obtain the minimum acceptable bid for the next round. The Bureau will initially set the weighting factor at 0.5, the minimum percentage at 0.1 (10%), and the maximum percentage at 0.2 (20%). Hence, at these initial settings, the minimum acceptable bid for a license will be between ten percent and twenty percent higher than the provisionally winning bid, depending upon the bidding activity for the license. Equations and examples are shown in Attachment B. The eight additional bid amounts
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2437A6.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2437A6.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2437A6.txt
  • in the current round (round i) Ai-1 = activity index from previous round (round i-1), A0 is 0 Ii+1 = additional percentage for the next round (round i+1) N = minimum additional percentage or floor M = maximum additional percentage or ceiling Xi+1 = additional dollar amount Yi = provisionally winning bid amount from the current round Examples C = 0.5, N = 0.1, M = 0.2 Round 1 (2 bidders submitting bids, provisionally winning bid = $1,000,000) 1. Calculation of additional percentage for round 2: A1 = (0.5 * 2) + (0.5 * 0) = 1 I2 = The smaller of [((1 + 1) * 0.1) = 0.2] and 0.2 (the maximum additional percentage) = 0.2 2. Calculation of dollar
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2439A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2439A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2439A1.txt
  • used by the ITU to identify networks as being affected by a proposed modification to the Region 2 Plans. In Table 2 of Exhibit 1 to the Technical Appendix in Spectrum Five's petition, Spectrum Five identifies eight U.S. Region 2 Plan entries that would experience a decrease in OEPM of more than 0.25 dB, with decreases in OEPM ranging from 0.5 dB to 6.4 dB. Spectrum Five also identifies 14 proposed U.S. modifications to the Region 2 Plans that would suffer OEPM decreases of more than 0.25 dB, with decreases ranging from 3.5 dB to 16.7 dB. These levels trigger the ITU agreement-seeking process between the Netherlands, through which Spectrum Five filed its proposed Region 2 Plan modifications, and the United
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2447A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2447A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2447A1.txt
  • Frequency Systems, Directional Model No. DX32B-25-0.7 Maximum Effective Radiated Power (average): 0.76 kW Transmitter: Type Accepted. See Section 73.1660, 73.1665 and 73.1670 of the FCC Rules. Antenna Height Above Mean Sea Level: 365.7 meters HAAT: 225.4 meters Tower Registration Number: 1254286 DTS2 Channel: 25 Antenna Coordinates: N. Latitude: 40-37-13 W. Longitude: 75-17-37 Antenna Type: Radio Frequency Systems, Directional Model No. DX32H-25-0.5 Maximum Effective Radiated Power (average): 2.8 kW Transmitter: Type Accepted. See Section 73.1660, 73.1665 and 73.1670 of the FCC Rules. Antenna Height Above Mean Sea Level: 282.1 meters HAAT: 155.4 meters Tower Registration Number: n/a DTS3 Channel: 25 Antenna Coordinates: N. Latitude: 39-33-42 W. Longitude: 75-55-48 Antenna Type: Radio Frequency Systems, Directional Model No. DX32H-25-0.3 Maximum Effective Radiated Power (average):
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2575A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2575A1.txt
  • Date: 12/19/2006 Grant of Authority Special Temporary Authority XM Radio Inc. Page 1 of 2 For more information concerning this Notice, contact the Satellite Division at 202-418-0719; TTY 202-418-2555. On December 19, 2006, the Satellite Division granted special temporary authority (STA) to XM Radio Inc. (XM) to operate terrestrial repeaters with an Effective Isotropically Radiated Power (EIRP) of up to 0.5 watts and 0.0001 watts at the events, and with the technical parameters, specified in its application and in an amending letter filed December 18, 2006, for a period of 30 days, commencing on December 24, 2006, subject to conditions. XM states that the repeaters will be used for demonstrations at trade shows across the United States. XM states the repeaters
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-473A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-473A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-473A1.txt
  • FM Broadcasting Agreement defines the parameters for Class B and Class C1 facilities. For example, a Class B facility has a maximum effective radiated power (ERP) of 50 kilowatts (kW) with an antenna height above average terrain (HAAT) of 150 meters (m), which produces a protected contour extending 65 kilometers (km). The protected contour of a Class B facility is 0.5 mV/m (54 dBu). Conversely, a Class C1 facility has a maximum ERP of 100kW with an HAAT of 300m, which produces a protected contour extending 72km. The protected contour of a Class C1 facility is 1.0 mV/m (60 dBu). BCA C1 Application at Exhibit III. In a letter dated July 29, 2005, BCA indicated that the C1 facility was fully
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-774A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-774A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-774A1.txt
  • density levels beginning at 1.25 degrees off-axis with 0.1 degree increments out to 2.25 degrees off-axis. The demonstration should include a comparison of the authorized off-axis EIRP density limits specified in Section 25.222(a)(1)-(4) of the Commission's rules. Finally, in Attachment C of the application, Stratos states that ``...the antenna controller can detect within 100 milliseconds a pointing error that exceeds 0.5 degrees and cease transmissions immediately...''. Stratos must clarify in any refiling whether the antenna controller can automatically detect and cease transmissions within 100 milliseconds of a pointing error that exceeds 0.5 degrees, in conformance with Section 25.222(a)(7) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 25.222(a)(7). Accordingly, pursuant to Section 25.112(a)(1) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 25.112 (a)(1), and
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-775A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-775A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-775A1.txt
  • density levels beginning at 1.25 degrees off-axis with 0.1 degree increments out to 2.25 degrees off-axis. The demonstration should include a comparison of the authorized off-axis EIRP density limits specified in Section 25.222(a)(1)-(4) of the Commission's rules. Finally, in Attachment C of the application, Stratos states that ``...the antenna controller can detect within 100 milliseconds a pointing error that exceeds 0.5 degrees and cease transmissions immediately...''. Stratos must clarify in any refiling whether the antenna controller can automatically detect and cease transmissions within 100 milliseconds of a pointing error that exceeds 0.5 degrees, in conformance with Section 25.222(a)(7) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 25.222(a)(7). Accordingly, pursuant to Section 25.112(a)(1) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 25.112 (a)(1), and
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-960A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-960A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-960A1.txt
  • calculation factors (NOTE 2) % FDP (in 1 MHz) (NOTE 1) P r dB/ degrees P r dB/ degrees 2 500-2 520 Analogue FS telephony 2 520-2 535 Analogue FS telephony (NOTE 5) - 154 dB(W/m2) in 4 kHz and - 136 dB(W/m2) in 1 MHz 75 - 146 dB(W/m2) in 4 kHz and - 128 dB(W/m2) in 1 MHz 0.5 All other cases - 136 dB(W/m2) in 1 MHz 0.75 - 128 dB(W/m2) in 1 MHz 0.5 25 Reasons: Consequential to adding pfd limit for MSS to Article 21, Table 21-4 per USA/ /1. Limits on MSS pfd eliminate the need for coordination with terrestrial systems in the band 2 500-2 535 MHz. Document WAC/102(27.04.06): To the WRC-07 Advisory Committee:
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-9A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-9A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-9A1.txt
  • compliance with the Commission's rules at coordinates 43-44-41 NL and 103-28-52 WL, which requires a site restriction of 55 kilometers (34.2 miles) southwest of Ellsworth AFB. Lastly, Channel 283A can be allotted to Murdo at the New Station current authorized site in compliance with the Commission's rules at coordinates 43-53-24 NL and 100-43-06 WL, which requires a site restriction of 0.5 kilometers (0.3 miles) west of Murdo. We modify the Station KAWK(FM) license to specify Ellsworth AFB as the community of license pursuant to Section 1.420(i) of the Commission's rules, which permits the modification of a station's license to specify a new community of license without affording other interested parties an opportunity to file competing expressions of interest in the proposed
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1564A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1564A2.txt
  • dB gain; 500 kHz ­ 1000 MHz; 5 watts output) Attenuators Attenuators preceding A1 and A2 are selected to reduce IM3 to acceptable levels Step Attenuator-C set to reduce IM3 of A4 to acceptable levels Step Attenuators D & U: Alan Industries models 50V70 N, 50V10 N, and 50V1 N cascaded to provide 0 - 81 dB in 0.1-dB steps (0.5W max power) Combiners & Splitter: MiniCircuits ZAPD-900-5W (100-900 MHz) Custom Band-Reject Filters "30N" = Tin Lee CE7-569(4.8)N50 "30W" = Microwave Filter Company model 16195 "P52-53" = Tin Lee CE7-692/697.4(20) N50 "P53-56" = Tin Lee CE7-692/698 N50 Impedance Matching Minimum Loss Pads = Trilithic ZM-57 75-50 ohm transformer = Trilithic ZMT-57 25-ft coax = Times Microwave LMR-400-UF Equipment settings Agilent E4437B
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1708A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1708A1.txt
  • and technical specifications set forth in its application, Federal Communication Commission rules, and the attachment to grant. SAT-STA-20070222-00037E Effective Date: 04/12/2007 Grant of Authority Special Temporary Authority XM Radio Inc. On April 12, 2007, the Satellite Division granted special temporary authority to XM Radio Inc. to operate indoor terrestrial repeaters with an Effective Isotropically Radiated Power (EIRP) of up to 0.5 watts and 0.0001 watts at events such as promotional events, press events, and trade shows at locations and dates yet to be identified for a period of 30 days, commencing on April 13, 2007, subject to conditions. INFORMATIVE SAT-STA-20070330-00059 XM Radio Inc. The application captioned above was accepted for filing in a separate public notice today. See Public Notice, Space
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1932A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1932A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1932A1.txt
  • new interference to WABA(AM) by increasing the 25% Root Sum Square (``RSS'') limit to WABA(AM) in violation of Section 73.182 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''). This would decrease WABA(AM)'s existing nighttime interference-free (``NIF'') service by some 13,000 listeners. The May 4 Letter also stated that: (1) WFTL(AM)'s proposed 0.025 mV/m -10% skywave contour would overlap the 50 kW nighttime 0.5 mV/m - 50% skywave contour of co-channel Mexican stations XETQ and XETQ1, Orizaba, VC, in violation of the US/Mexico Treaty; (2) WFTL(AM)'s proposed 0.025 mV/m contour would overlap the protected 0.5 mV/m daytime groundwave contour of co-channel Cuban stations CMGB, Trinidad, and CMJB, Mayari Arrib; and (3) the tower registration for the seventh nighttime tower in WFTL(AM)'s proposed directional array
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1946A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1946A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1946A1.txt
  • 49. For example, Clarity has proposed to use emergency shut-off procedures when interference to BAS or CARS communications is detected. Clarity also provides updated and detailed procedures that are outlined under their operating protocol. Clarity has also engineered its system to use downward tilting antennas to limit radiation towards the horizon and has proposed to lower their operating power from 0.5 watts per channel to 0.2 watts per channel. See Letter dated January 18, 2007 from Clarity Media Systems, to Marlene H. Dortch, FCC, Amendment to Clarity Media Systems Applications, at 6. See SBE Comments at 5. As noted above, there is no information available on record regarding digital-to-digital interference. In addition, the possibility that entities other than Clarity could request
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-198A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-198A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-198A1.txt
  • Satellite GPS L5 GPS L2/L-band radar GPS L1 3G Band 1 PCS Handsets PCS Base Stations 3G Band 2 SDARS S-band Radar (ASR/WWR) Maritime Radar C-Band Earth Station -53.3 -53.3 -53.5 -51.3 -51.3 -51.3 -41.3 -41.3 -41.3 -41.3 -41.3 -47.3 -48.8 -52.9 -44.3 -49.0 -43.5 -28.5 -22.1 -30.1 -26.6 -40.8 6 4.5 0.6 7 2.3 7.8 12.8 19.2 11.2 14.7 0.5 The emissions consist of a time-dithered train of pulses with a nominal pulse period (``T'') of 410 microseconds resulting in a PRF of 2440 Hz. The width of an individual pulse is approximately 5 nanoseconds, and the nominal peak-to-average ratio is 30 dB. The highest RMS EIRP emission level, -20.3 dBm/MHz, was obtained at 2325 MHz. The highest peak emission
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-204A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-204A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-204A1.txt
  • may be made in unusual circumstances upon an applicant's showing, through a request for waiver, that: 1) there is no reasonable alternative to the transmission path proposed; 2) no harmful interference will occur to geostationary satellite systems; and 3) the maximum value of the equivalent isotropically radiated power (EIRP) does not exceed +47 dBW for any antenna beam directed within 0.5 degrees of the stationary satellite orbit, or +47 to +55 dBW on a linear decibel scale for any antenna beam directed between 0.5 degrees and 1.5 degrees of the stationary orbit. Generally, regulations governing the licensing of new microwave systems permit applicants to begin operating their systems pursuant to conditional authority immediately upon filing of the related license application. However,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2104A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2104A1.txt
  • S2181 SAT-STA-20061117-00141E Effective Date: 05/11/2007 Withdrawn Special Temporary Authority SES Americom, Inc. Nature of Service:Fixed Satellite Service SAT-STA-20070222-00036E Effective Date: 05/17/2007 Grant of Authority Special Temporary Authority XM Radio Inc. On May 17, 2007, the Satellite Division granted special temporary authority to XM Radio Inc. (XM) to operate indoor terrestrial repeaters with Effective Isotropically Radiated Powers (EIRP) of up to 0.5 watts and up to 0.0001 watts at various events - such as promotional events, press events, and trade shows - for a period of 180 days, with the technical parameters specified in its application and subject to conditions. SAT-STA-20070424-00063E Effective Date: 05/15/2007 Grant of Authority Special Temporary Authority Sirius Satellite Radio Inc. On May 15, 2007, the Satellite Division granted
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-227A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-227A1.txt
  • is specified. For more information concerning this Notice, contact the Satellite Division at 202-418-0719; TTY 202-418-2555. SAT-STA-20070117-00011E Effective Date: 01/19/2007 Grant of Authority Special Temporary Authority XM RADIO INC. On January 19, 2007, the Satellite Division granted special temporary authority (STA) to XM Radio Inc. (XM) to operate terrestrial repeaters with an Effective Isotropically Radiated Power (EIRP) of up to 0.5 watts and 0.0001 watts at the events, and with the technical parameters, specified in the above-captioned application for a period of 30 days, commencing on January 19, 2007, subject to conditions. INFORMATIVE S2689 SAT-LOA-20051123-00250 DIRECTV Enterprises, LLC The Bureau has determined that DIRECTV Enterprises, LLC (DIRECTV) has met the Contract Execution, Critical Design Review, Commence Construction, and Launch and Operation
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2650A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2650A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2650A1.txt
  • service; (2) second full-time aural service; (3) first local service; and (4) other public interest matters. Co-equal weight is given to priorities (2) and (3). If WWB's proposed reallotment is adopted, Rockmart will continue to be served by Station WZOT(AM), Rockmart, Georgia, and Channel 296C1 would provide a first local service at Aragon, Georgia. Station WTSH-FM currently provides service to 0.5 percent of the Atlanta, Georgia, Urbanized Area. That coverage would increase to 5.6 percent, if WWB's proposal is adopted. Faye and Richard Tuck, Memorandum Opinion and Order, 3 FCC Rcd 5374 (1988) (``Tuck''). In its comments, WWB supplies evidence demonstrating that Aragon has its own post office and zip code (30104); its own local government and elected officials; and numerous
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-30A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-30A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-30A1.txt
  • from the prior round. The additional percentage is determined as one plus the activity index times a minimum percentage amount, with the result not to exceed a given maximum. The additional percentage is then multiplied by the provisionally winning bid amount to obtain the minimum acceptable bid for the next round. The Commission will initially set the weighting factor at 0.5, the minimum percentage at 0.1 (10%), and the maximum percentage at 0.2 (20%). Hence, at these initial settings, the minimum acceptable bid for a license will be between 10% and 20% higher than the provisionally winning bid, depending upon the bidding activity for the license. Equations and examples are shown in Attachment E. The eight additional bid amounts are calculated
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3415A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3415A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3415A1.txt
  • index from the prior round. The additional percentage is determined as one plus the activity index times a minimum percentage amount, with the result not to exceed a given maximum. The additional percentage is then multiplied by the CPE amount to obtain the minimum acceptable bid for the next round. The Bureau proposes initially to set the weighting factor at 0.5, the minimum percentage at 0.1 (10%), and the maximum percentage at 0.2 (20%). Hence, at these initial settings, the minimum acceptable bid for a license will be between ten percent and twenty percent higher than the CPE (which, for non-C Block licenses not subject to HPB, will equal the provisionally winning bid), depending upon the bidding activity covering the license.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3415A3.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3415A3.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3415A3.txt
  • percentage or floor M = maximum additional percentage or ceiling Xi+1 = additional dollar amount Yi = current price estimate (CPE) for the license from the current round (The CPE for a license is the provisionally winning bid, unless there is a provisionally winning package bid covering the license. See Attachment C for more information on CPEs.) Examples C = 0.5, N = 0.1, M = 0.2 Round 1 (1 bidder submitting bids, CPE = $1,000,000) 1. Calculation of additional percentage for round 2: A1 = (0.5 * 1) + (0.5 * 0) = 0.5 I2 = The smaller of [((1 + 0.5) * 0.1) = 0.15] and 0.2 (the maximum additional percentage) = 0.15 2. Calculation of dollar amount associated
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3470A11.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3470A11.txt
  • most weight, data from markets 99 and 101 get the next most weight, and so forth. The particular smoothing method employed is called "loess" and is described in William S. Cleveland, The Elements of Graphing Data (Hobart Press, 1994). The specific implementation is from the "loess" command in the statistical package "S-PLUS 2000," with the smoothing parameter set equal to 0.5. 19 pt to use these figures to smaller owners. Com or the or the , panies. Thus, the use of the S&P 500 companies to create benchmark ratios reflects an effort to create benchmarks based upon a broad swath of Because the points on the lines are averages, the reader should not attem make specific market to market comparisons. Data
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3470A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3470A2.txt
  • MINIMUM REPORTING STANDARDS AND ARE SUPPLIED FOR INTERNAL USE ONLY. COPYRIGHT © THE NIELSEN COMPANY NIELSEN MEDIA RESEARCH FCC PHONE SURVEY MAY 2007 PAGE: 2 TABLE 001 (continued) Q1. IN AN AVERAGE WEEK, HOW MUCH TIME DO YOU SPEND, IN TOTAL, WATCHING OR LISTENING TO BROADCAST TELEVISION CHANNELS? BASE: ALL RESPONDENTS TOTAL =========== 9 HOURS TO LESS THAN 10 HOURS 0.5 10 HOURS TO LESS THAN 11 HOURS 8.5 11 HOURS TO LESS THAN 12 HOURS 0.3 12 HOURS TO LESS THAN 13 HOURS 2.3 13 HOURS TO LESS THAN 14 HOURS 0.1 14 HOURS TO LESS THAN 15 HOURS 2.8 15 HOURS TO LESS THAN 16 HOURS 3.5 16 HOURS TO LESS THAN 17 HOURS 0.4 17 HOURS TO LESS
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3470A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3470A5.txt
  • 20,158 31 19,740 21,180 NewsMin 2,316 2,117 0 8,685 PubAffMin 324 512 0 11,400 News + Public Affairs Minutes 2,632 2,122 0 11,520 Number of Shows 449.8 75.3 14.0 699.0 Number of News Shows 53.3 48.4 0 254.0 Number of Public Affairs Shows 9 11 0 120 TotPop1000s 2,318.4 3,370.9 9.8 20,687.4 PopPercentBlack 11.2 10.8 0.3 63.1 PopPercentHisp 11.1 14.7 0.5 94.5 DMAPerCapitaIncome 29,680 5,339 14,882 49,582 UnrelatedStationsinDMACount 9.64 5.62 0 26 UnrelatedStationsinDMANewsMin 20,784 11,821 0 71,787 UnrelatedStationsinDMAPubAffMin 3,053 2,736 0 17,064 UnrelatedStationsinDMANewsPAMin 23,755 13,525 0 74,799 ParentStationsCount 16.27 15.99 1 61 ParentRevenueMillions 296 518 0 2330 OtherCoOwnedStationsinDMACount 0.52 0.82 0 5 OtherCoOwnStationsinDMANewsMin 1,165 2,590 0 18,585 OtherCoOwnStationsinDMAPubAffMin 174 462 0 4,320 OtherCoOwnStationsinDMANews&PubAffMin 1,335 2,778 0 18,894 Values Counts for Dummy
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3470A7.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3470A7.txt
  • radio station -37.6** (2.15) -34.3* (1.92) -15.4 (1.12) -7.2 (0.58) Cross-owned radio and newspaper 1.9 (0.07) 6.4 (0.25) -0.9 (0.04) -16.3 (0.80) Parent company coverage of all television households (%) 1.2 (1.47) 1.2* (1.90) 0.2 (0.31) Network owned and operated -5.7 (0.27) -25.4 (1.50) -9.3 (0.57) Network affiliation (omitted category is CW\MyNetwork) ABC 2.1 (0.13) 6.4 (0.32) CBS -9.5 (0.59) -0.5 (0.02) FOX 54.1*** (3.56) 40.0** (2.44) NBC 6.6 (0.43) 15.0 (0.71) Other control variables Time and length of broadcast fixed effects No No No No Yes DMA and date fixed effects Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Adjusted R-squared .25 .27 .27 .33 .34 Notes: Absolute values of t-statistics in parentheses (using heteroscedastic-consistent standard errors corrected for clustering by television station);
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3A1.txt
  • the pleadings and letters as requested by the parties. See 5 U.S.C. § 552 et seq.; 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.457, 0.459. The parties submitted redacted copies of their pleadings and letters for inclusion in the Commission's public file. Confidential information is included in the attached Appendix. Mediacom filed a ``Motion for Consideration by Full Commission,'' pursuant to 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.5(c), 0.211, 0. 283(c) and 1.41. Mediacom argues that while retransmission consent matters generally fall within the scope of the Bureau's delegated authority, the Bureau's authority extends only to matters that are minor or routine and that do not present novel questions of law, fact or policy that cannot be resolved under existing precedents and guidelines. Mediacom's motion is denied. We
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4171A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4171A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4171A1.txt
  • activity index from the prior round. The additional percentage is determined as one plus the activity index times a minimum percentage amount, with the result not to exceed a given maximum. The additional percentage is then multiplied by the CPE amount to obtain the minimum acceptable bid for the next round. We proposed initially to set the weighting factor at 0.5, the minimum percentage (floor) at 0.1 (10%), and the maximum percentage (ceiling) at 0.2 (20%). At these initial settings, the minimum acceptable bid for a license will be between ten percent and twenty percent higher than the CPE (which, for non-C Block licenses will equal the provisionally winning bid), depending upon the bidding activity covering the license. Equations and examples
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4389A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4389A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4389A1.txt
  • the required spacing, in rugged mountain range where interference to short-spaced station was unlikely). See WREL, Inc., Memorandum Opinion and Order, 68 FCC2d 1043 (1978), aff'd, 45 R.R. 2d 319 (1979) (waiver of former radio contour overlap rule for overlap of 8.1 sq. miles with 185 people, with area of overlap comprising 2 percent of one station's service area and 0.5 percent of the other's, where applicant surrendered authorization for a third station). See Reply at 6 (citing Caloosa Television Corporation, Memorandum Opinion and Order, 3 FCC Rcd 3656 (1988), on recon. 4 FCC Rcd 4762 (1989) (waiver of spacing rules based on combination of several public interest factors); Time Warner, Inc., Memorandum Opinion and Order, 12 FCC Rcd 15300 (CSB
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-514A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-514A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-514A1.txt
  • from the prior round. The additional percentage is determined as one plus the activity index times a minimum percentage amount, with the result not to exceed a given maximum. The additional percentage is then multiplied by the provisionally winning bid amount to obtain the minimum acceptable bid for the next round. The Commission will initially set the weighting factor at 0.5, the minimum percentage at 0.1 (10%), and the maximum percentage at 0.2 (20%). Hence, at these initial settings, the minimum acceptable bid for a license will be between 10% and 20% higher than the provisionally winning bid, depending upon the bidding activity for the license. Equations and examples are shown in Attachment E. The additional bid amounts are calculated using
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-693A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-693A1.txt
  • is specified. For more information concerning this Notice, contact the Satellite Division at 202-418-0719; TTY 202-418-2555. SAT-STA-20061211-00147E Effective Date: 02/09/2007 Grant of Authority Special Temporary Authority XM Radio Inc. On February 9, 2007, the Satellite Division granted special temporary authority (STA) to XM Radio Inc. (XM) to operate terrestrial repeaters with an Effective Isotropically Radiated Power (EIRP) of up to 0.5 watts and 0.0001 watts at the events, and with the technical parameters, specified in Exhibit A to the above-captioned application for a period of 180 days, commencing on February 9, 2007, subject to conditions. INFORMATIVE SAT-STA-20061207-00145 Sirius Satellite Radio Inc. The application captioned above was accepted for filing today. See Satellite Policy Branch Information: Satellite Space Station Applications Accepted for
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-952A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-952A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-952A1.txt
  • that its proposal would adequately protect broadcast stations from potential harmful interference, consistent with the underlying purpose of Section 90.242(b)(4)(iv). Each application for TIS must be accompanied by a statement certifying that the proposed station satisfies the minimum separation distances specified in Section 90.242(a)(2)(i). Specifically, the proposed station must be located at least 15 km (9.3 miles) outside the measured 0.5 mV/m service contour of any broadcast station operating on the first adjacent channel, or at least 130 km (80.6 miles) for broadcast stations operating on a co-channel basis. Arlington states that Fire Station #2 would be located 82.18 km from first adjacent channel station WPTX, Lexington Park, Maryland, operating on frequency 1690 kHz. The separation between the respective stations' 0.5
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1090A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1090A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1090A1.txt
  • additional percentage is determined by adding one to the activity index, and multiplying that sum by a minimum percentage, with the result not to exceed a maximum percentage. The additional percentage is then multiplied by the provisionally winning bid amount to obtain the minimum acceptable bid for the next round. The Bureau proposed initially to set the weighting factor at 0.5, the minimum percentage (floor) at 0.1 (10%), and the maximum percentage (ceiling) at 0.2 (20%). At these initial settings, the minimum acceptable bid for a license will generally be between ten percent and twenty percent higher than the provisionally winning bid, depending upon the bidding activity for the license. Equations and examples are shown in Attachment E. Additional Bid Amounts
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1156A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1156A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1156A1.txt
  • with which orbital parameters will be maintained is to help interested third parties evaluate proposed systems with respect to collision avoidance and safe-flight profiles. Although Satellite CD Radio has provided information regarding the apogee and perigee of the FM-6 satellite and has specified that the satellite ``will be maintained in longitude of apogee at 96.0 degrees West Longitude within +/- 0.5 degrees,'' it has not disclosed all the information required under Section 25.114(d)(14)(iii). In particular, it is not clear from the modification application whether, for example, the apogee and perigee indicated represent target values, or whether they constitute an ``outer boundary'' for the satellite's normal operations. Furthermore, Satellite CD Radio does not provide any information on the accuracy with which the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-120A1.pdf
  • Authority XM Radio Inc. Page 1 of 2 For more information concerning this Notice, contact the Satellite Division at 202-418-0719; TTY 202-418-2555. On January 11, 2008, the Policy Branch granted with conditions XM Radio Inc. request for Special Temporary Authority (STA) to operate one indoor terrestrial repeater in Vienna, VA, with an Effective Isotropically Radiated Power (EIRP) of up to 0.5 watts (average) for 60 days effective January 11, 2008, according to the technical parameters specified in its application. SAT-STA-20080103-00002 E Effective Date: 01/11/2008 Grant of Authority Special Temporary Authority Sirius Satellite Radio Inc. On January 11, 2007, the Policy Branch granted with conditions Sirius Satellite Radio Inc.'s request for special temporary authority to operate an indoor terrestrial repeater with Effective
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1363A1.pdf
  • operations on, their final, full-authorized post-transition (DTV) facility. Key Compliance Requirement(s) To accomplishthe key objectives (above), the Commission took the following actions in the Third DTV Periodic Report and Order: (1)Required all stations to report on their transition status; (2)Established construction permit ("CP") filing requirements; (3)Set post-transition construction deadlines; (4)Offered provisions for regulatory relief upon the appropriate demonstration; (5)Adopted a 0.5 percent new interference standard for post-transition operations; and (6)Announced an upcoming opportunity for stations to seek expanded facilities. Reporting Requirement on Stations' DTV Transition Status (FCC Form 387) Stations must provide the specific details of their current transition status, any additional steps necessary for digital-only operation upon expiration of the February 17, 2009 transition deadline, and a timeline for making
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1476A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1476A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1476A1.txt
  • in the 2008 TRS Cost Recovery Methodology Order, and described in the 2008 NECA Filing. This rate is determined by multiplying the current IP Relay rate by an Inflation Factor, an Efficiency Factor, and including appropriate Exogenous Costs. The Inflation Factor is the Gross Domestic Product minus the Price Index (GDP-PI), and the Efficiency Factor is the Inflation factor minus 0.5 percent to account for productivity gains. As reported by NECA, the application of the price cap formula results in a reduction of approximately 0.5 percent from the 2007-2008 rate of $1.293 for IP Relay. Intrastate and Interstate VRS NECA proposes tiered rates of $6.7362 for the first 50,000 monthly minutes, $6.4675 for monthly minutes between 50,001 and 500,000, and $6.2685
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1596A1.pdf
  • the release date of this Notice, except where an effective date is specified. SAT-STA-20080429-00094 E Effective Date: 07/01/2008 Grant of Authority Special Temporary Authority XM Radio Inc. On July 1, 2008, the Satellite Policy Branch granted XM Radio Inc. (XM Radio) special temporary authority to operate one indoor terrestrial repeater with an Effective Isotropically Radiated Power (EIRP) of up to 0.5 watts (average) for 180 days at a location in Vienna, Virginia. The repeater will operate within the 2332.5-2345 MHz frequency band allocated for the Satellite Digital Audio Radio Service (SDARS) and assigned to the exclusive use of XM. This authorization is granted according to the technical parameters specified in Exhibits A & B of the application and is subject to
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-161A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-161A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-161A1.txt
  • as Section 307(b) issues. WSLW(AM) is the sole local transmission service licensed at White Sulphur Springs, West Virginia (2000 Census population of 2,315). Quorum/WVJT propose to change WSLW(AM)'s community of license to Bexley, Ohio (2000 Census population of 13,203) as that community's first local radio transmission service. WVJT claims in its Section 307(b) analysis that ``[n]o portion of the WSLW 0.5 mV/m contour is served by fewer than two existing aural services.'' On April 11, 2007, Positive Alternative Radio, Inc. (``PAR'') filed a Consolidated Petition to Deny against, inter alia, the Application, arguing that the Application violates the Commission's policy against removal of sole local service from a community, and also that Quorum/WVJT propose to build two new towers without providing
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1660A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1660A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1660A1.txt
  • Rules defines an AM secondary service area as the area served by the station's skywave signal. Class A stations provide nighttime secondary service entitled to protection from co-channel station interference, but Class B stations provide only primary service. Accordingly, as a result of KGA(AM)'s proposed change in status from Class A to Class B, it would no longer have protected 0.5 mV/m skywave secondary service. As a result of nighttime skywave propagation, the signals of powerful clear channel stations, such as KGA(AM), can extend for hundreds of miles. However, due to innate variations in signal strength, service may be intermittent at any given point within the protected contour. Skywave service is subject to a lower level of interference protection than a
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-172A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-172A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-172A1.txt
  • the station to use its analog antenna or a new antenna to avoid a significant reduction in post-transition service from its analog service area; (2) Would be no more than five miles larger in any direction than their authorized service area, as defined by the post-transition DTV Table Appendix B; and (3) Would not cause impermissible interference, i.e., more than 0.5 percent new interference, to other stations. Third DTV Periodic Report and Order, supra note 1, at ¶ 151. Approximately 123 petitions for reconsideration of the Seventh Report and Order were filed by October 26, 2007, the close of the pleading cycle. See MB Docket No. 87-268. See also Public Notice, ``Petitions for Reconsideration of Action in Rulemaking Proceeding,'' MB Docket
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1946A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1946A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1946A1.txt
  • the WMCW Petition as moot because, with the surrender of the WMCW(AM) license, there are no longer any facilities to modify. Background. Station WONX(AM) is licensed to operate on 1590 kHz with a power of 3.5 kW daytime and 2.5 kW nighttime, employing a four-tower directional antenna system. Station WMCW(AM) is licensed on 1600 KHz with a daytime power of 0.5 kW and a nighttime power of 0.018 kW, employing a non-directional antenna system. In the IRA, the parties propose: (1) grant of the WONX(AM) Application, which would increase WONX(AM)'s daytime power to 7 kW; and (2) surrender of the WMCW(AM) license. In the IRA, the applicants contend that grant of the proposals will increase service from WONX(AM), eliminate existing prohibited
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2148A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2148A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2148A1.txt
  • spacing requirement'' when evaluating applications to construct post-transition facilities, as well as rulemaking petitions by authorized DTV stations that wish to change their assigned DTV channels. It proposed to use geographic spacing only for rulemaking petitions seeking new DTV channel allotments. In the Third DTV Periodic Report and Order, the Commission stated that it would ``permit stations a limit of 0.5 percent new interference in addition to that in the DTV Table B Appendix.'' With respect to rulemaking petitions seeking new DTV channel allotments however, the Commission stated that it would continue to use geographic spacing. The petition for reconsideration to which Capitol refers merely asks, in pertinent part, for additional clarification that the Commission's intent was not to apply the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2243A3.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2243A3.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2243A3.txt
  • to provide an estimate of the interference distance in the case where the detection scheme fails to identify a weak-signal occupied channel. Undesired Signal (U) Transmission System The undesired signal was produced by the Adaptrum transmitter coupled with an external 21 dB gain wideband amplifier. The WSD is capable of transmitting an OFDM signal with a signal bandwidth adjustable from 0.5 to 18 MHz. A vertically-polarized planar bi-conical transmit antenna at a height of 2 meters (6.6 feet) above ground level (AGL) was used to radiate the signal generated by the transmitter. The EIRP of the WSD prototype transmitter was measured in the semi-anechoic chamber and determined to nominally be +22 dBm (~150 mW). See Section 3.4 for details. Figure 4-1
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2392A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2392A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2392A1.txt
  • proposed contingent facilities changes. We will therefore examine the parties' IRA here in light of these four factors. Reduction in Interference. The IRA states that the licensed facilities of WBIS are predicted to cause interference to the licensed operations of WFYL(AM), King of Prussia, Pennsylvania. It demonstrates that the WBIS(AM), Annapolis, Maryland, interfering contour overlaps a portion of the WFYL 0.5 mV/m coverage contour. Removal of WBIS will permit interference-free service by WFYL to 113,749 people (2000 US Census data) over an area of 419 square kilometers. Increased Service. The IRA indicates that the Station's proposed power increase will result in the 0.5 mV/m contour covering 6,283,850 people in an 18,060 square kilometer area. This is 5,090,414 persons and 12,222 square
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-311A1.pdf
  • Washington, D.C. from February 4, 2008 through August 1, 2008. SAT-STA-20071219-00178 E Effective Date: 02/05/2008 Grant of Authority Special Temporary Authority XM Radio Inc. On February 5, 2008, the Satellite Policy Branch granted with conditions special temporary authority to XM Radio Inc. to operate one indoor terrestrial repeater in Vienna, VA, with an Effective Isotropically Radiated Power of up to 0.5 watts (average) for 180 days from February 6, 2008 to August 3, 2008, according to the terms, conditions, and technical specifications set forth in XM's application, the attachment to the grant and the Commission's rules. INFORMATIVE S2677 SAT-PPL-20050706-00143 Star One S.A. The Bureau has determined that Star One S.A. has met the Launch and Operate milestone associated with this grant.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-347A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-347A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-347A1.txt
  • For the reasons set forth below we deny the petition for reconsideration. Background. On January 5, 2006, SIBR filed the above-captioned application for a license to cover a construction permit. The construction permit authorized SIBR to construct a new Class B AM station, KPOE, on 880 kilohertz at Midland, Texas. The station was to employ 2.0 kW daytime power and 0.5 kW nighttime power using different daytime and nighttime transmitter sites and directional antenna systems. On March 17, 2006, the staff dismissed the above-captioned license to cover application as patently defective. The staff found that: (1) the authorized KPOE(AM) nighttime facilities were not constructed before the construction permit expiration date of December 16, 2005; (2) SIBR failed to submit complete nondirectional
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-401A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-401A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-401A1.txt
  • and searches for a new downlink signal, and, according to Raysat, until the MET finds the correct downlink signal and is properly pointed, it is not permitted to transmit. The Raysat system also incorporates automatic muting capabilities designed to protect adjacent satellites from interference in case of pointing errors. Specifically, in the event a MET mechanically mispoints by more than 0.5 degrees, it will mute the transmit carrier. Such muting will occur in less than 100 milliseconds (ms). In addition, if the downlink signal from the satellite is lost for any reason, the MET will sense this loss of signal and will mute transmissions. Once muted, the MET may not re-commence transmissions until the pointing error is corrected, or the intended
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-490A2.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-490A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-490A2.txt
  • drop down menus) to provide information about the purpose and function of web site elements. Provide a search engine to facilitate site navigation. Availability and Access The NANPA web site shall be available 24 hours a day, 7 days a week. The web site shall be able to support up to 500 simultaneous users with an average holding time of 0.5 hours. System Responsiveness The NANPA shall provide rapid response when accessing the web site. The NANPA shall provide a system such that a 56 Kbps modem-equipped user will be able to view the complete home page in less than 8 seconds, 95% of the time over any 12-month period. If a user is experiencing greater than 12 seconds to view
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-530A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-530A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-530A1.txt
  • In Regions 1 and 3 (except for Japan), in the band 8025-8400 MHz, the Earth exploration-satellite service using geostationary satellites shall not produce a power flux-density in excess of the following provisional values for angles of arrival ((), without the consent of the affected administration: -174 dB(W/m²) in a 4 kHz band for 0( ( ( ( 5( -174 + 0.5 (( - 5) dB(W/m²) in a 4 kHz band for 5( ( ( ( 25( -164 dB(W/m²) in a 4 kHz band for 25( ( ( ( 90( These values are subject to study under Resolution 124 (WRC-97).6 * * * * * 5.469A In the band 8550-8650 MHz, stations in the Earth exploration-satellite service (active) and space research service
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-684A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-684A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-684A1.txt
  • beyond eighty kilometers of Philadelphia, Pennsylvania pursuant to Section 1.925 of the Commission's rules, or, alternatively, Section 337(c) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``the Act''). In addition, York requests to license individually eighty-three control stations to be associated with the twenty-two-site system. All control stations would be located within York County except for one that would be 0.5 kilometers into adjacent Adams County, Pennsylvania. York notes that all would be within the currently authorized mobile area of operation, thus meeting the requirement of Section 90.305(c). Although York does not require a waiver for the proposed control stations, we consider them in this Order as a matter of administrative efficiency, given that the subject control stations comprise an integral
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-767A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-767A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-767A1.txt
  • additional percentage is determined by adding one to the activity index, and multiplying that sum by a minimum percentage, with the result not to exceed a maximum percentage. The additional percentage is then multiplied by the provisionally winning bid amount to obtain the minimum acceptable bid for the next round. The Bureau proposes initially to set the weighting factor at 0.5, the minimum percentage at 0.1 (10%), and the maximum percentage at 0.2 (20%). Hence, at these initial settings, the minimum acceptable bid for a license will be between ten percent and twenty percent higher than the provisionally winning bid, depending upon the bidding activity for the license. Equations and examples are shown in Attachment C. Additional Bid Amounts Any additional
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-767A4.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-767A4.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-767A4.txt
  • in the current round (round i) Ai-1 = activity index from previous round (round i-1), A0 is 0 Ii+1 = additional percentage for the next round (round i+1) N = minimum additional percentage or floor M = maximum additional percentage or ceiling Xi+1 = additional dollar amount Yi = provisionally winning bid amount from the current round Examples C = 0.5, N = 0.1, M = 0.2 Round 1 (1 bidder submitting bids, provisionally winning bid = $1,000,000) 1. Calculation of additional percentage for round 2: A1 = (0.5 * 1) + (0.5 * 0) = 0.5 I2 = The smaller of [((1 + 0.5) * 0.1) = 0.15] and 0.2 (the maximum additional percentage) = 0.15 2. Calculation of dollar
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1376A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1376A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1376A1.txt
  • from the prior round. The additional percentage is determined as one plus the activity index times a minimum percentage amount, with the result not to exceed a maximum. The additional percentage is then multiplied by the provisionally winning bid amount to obtain the minimum acceptable bid for the next round. The Bureau proposed initially to set the weighting factor at 0.5, the minimum percentage (floor) at 0.1 (10%), and the maximum percentage (ceiling) at 0.3 (30%). At these initial settings, the minimum acceptable bid for a license will generally be between ten percent and thirty percent higher than the provisionally winning bid, depending upon the bidding activity for the license. Equations and examples are shown in Attachment E. Additional Bid Amounts
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1376A1_Rcd.pdf
  • Federal Communications Commission DA 09-1376 percentage is determined as one plus the activity index times a minimum percentage amount, with the result not to exceed a maximum. The additional percentage is then multiplied by the provisionally winning bid amount to obtain the minimum acceptable bid for the next round. 182. The Bureau proposed initially to set the weighting factor at 0.5, the minimum percentage (floor) at 0.1 (10%), and the maximum percentage (ceiling) at 0.3 (30%). At these initial settings, the minimum acceptable bid for a license will generally be between ten percent and thirty percent higher than the provisionally winning bid, depending upon the bidding activity for the license.214Equations and examples are shown in Attachment E. b. Additional Bid Amounts
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1451A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1451A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1451A1.txt
  • 2007 TRS Cost Recovery Methodology Order, and described in the 2009 TRS Rate Filing. This rate is determined by multiplying the current IP Relay rate by an Inflation Factor and an Efficiency Factor, and including appropriate Exogenous Costs. The Inflation Factor is the Gross Domestic Product minus the Price Index (GDP-PI), and the Efficiency Factor is the Inflation factor minus 0.5 percent to account for productivity gains. As reported by NECA, the application of the price cap formula results in a proposed rate of $1.2801, which represents a slight decrease from the 2008-2009 rate of $1.2865. Intrastate and Interstate VRS NECA proposes tiered rates of $6.7025 for the first 50,000 monthly minutes, $6.4352 for monthly minutes between 50,001 and 500,000, and
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1624A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1624A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1624A1.txt
  • interference to adjacent 17/24 GHz BSS satellite networks operating in compliance with the technical requirements of this rule than if its space station were located at the 103° W.L. Appendix F orbital location. To ensure that the DIRECTV RB-2 space station will not cause more interference to other co-frequency adjacent space stations, DIRECTV calculates that its proposed offset results in 0.5 dB less discrimination, based on the reduction of topocentric angle and the assumption of a 45 cm receive antenna that meets the reference antenna pattern of Section 25.224. DIRECTV properly used topocentric angular separation, the angle between the two orbital locations as measured with respect to an earth station located on the surface of the Earth, in making the PFD
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1624A1_Rcd.pdf
  • interference to adjacent 17/24 GHz BSS satellite networks operating in compliance with the technical requirements of this rule than if its space station were located at the 103° W.L. Appendix F orbital location.74 To ensure that the DIRECTV RB-2 space station will not cause more interference to other co-frequency adjacent space stations, DIRECTV calculates that its proposed offset results in 0.5 dB less discrimination, based on the reduction of topocentric angle and the assumption of a 45 cm receive antenna that meets the reference antennapattern of Section 25.224.75DIRECTV properly used topocentric angular separation, the angle between the two orbital locations as measured with respect to an earth station located on the surface of the Earth, in making the PFD reduction calculations.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1752A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1752A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1752A1.txt
  • operations. The ACU computes pointing error - that is, deviation of the antenna's main lobe from a sightline to the target satellite - from data delivered by the MDU. According to Row 44, the ACU is designed to limit pointing error to 0.2° during normal operation and will shut the AES transmitter down within 100 milliseconds if pointing error exceeds 0.5°. The pointing error is computed by the ACU from received dynamic Es/No values emanating from the MDU. The Es/No data is delivered at a rate of ten updates per second (i.e., every 100 milliseconds). Row 44 asserts that the 0.2° error limit is maintained under various types of aircraft motion, including compliance in situations where the aircraft is not on
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1752A1_Rcd.pdf
  • to faulty operations. The ACU computes pointing error ­that is, deviation of the antenna's main lobe from a sightline to the target satellite ­from data delivered by the MDU. According to Row 44, the ACU is designed to limit pointing error to 0.2° during normal operation and will shut the AES transmitter down within 100 milliseconds if pointing error exceeds 0.5°. The pointing error is computed by the ACU from received dynamic Es/No values emanating from the MDU. The Es/No data is delivered at a rate of ten updates per second (i.e., every 100 milliseconds). Row 44 asserts that the 0.2° error limit is maintained under various types of aircraft motion, including compliance in situations where the aircraft is not on
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1994A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1994A2.txt
  • Thesethresholdvaluesfortriggeringcoordinationwithterrestrialservicesareconsistent withreferencepowerfluxdensityfortheBSSvaluesthathavebeendevelopedandgivenin RecommendationITU-RBO.1776.Theyarealsoconsistentwiththepowerflux-densitylimits recommendedforthisbandinRecommendationITU-RF.760.Itisimportanttorecognizethat theITU-RBO.1776isreferencedinResolutions525(Rev.WRC-07)and551(Rev.WRC-07). ThecoordinationrequirementsfortheBSSsystemsinthe21.4-22.0GHzband introducedafter1April2007inrespecttoterrestrialservicesofRegion2areconflictingand ambiguous.Resolution525(Rev.WRC-07),asdiscussedpreviously,onlyappliestoRegions1 and3whileResolution33(Rev.WRC-03)appliesforinter-Regionalcoordination,butithasno pfdcriterionfortriggeringcoordination. ConsideringtheambiguityassociatedwiththeimplementationoftheBSSallocationand thedifficultyofcoordinatingspacestationswithterrestrialstations,theU.S.notesthatsharing betweensatelliteservicesinRegions1and3andterrestrialservicesinRegion2canbemost simplyimplementedthroughapfdlimitsregimeinArticle21,Section V.Inthepresentcase,the pfdvaluesdevelopedandgiveninRecommendationITU-RBO.1776andalsoappliedtotheBSS systemsthatwereintroducedinthesubjectbandpriorto1April2007couldbeusedasapower flux-densitylimitthatwouldapplytoallBSSsystemsinregion1and3forpurposesofsharing withtheFixedandMobileservicesinRegion2.SuchalimitwouldonlyapplytoBSSsatellite networks'beamsontheterritoriesofRegion2countries. 23 Proposal: IUSA/l.23/1 MOD ARTICLE21 Terrestrialandspaceservicessharingfrequencybandsabove1GHz SectionV-Limitsofpowerflux-densityfromspacestations TABLE21-4(CONTINUED)(RevWRC-07) LimitindB(W/m2)forangles Referenc Frequency Service* ofarrival(0)abovethehorizontalplane e band bandwid 0°_5° 5°_25° 25°-90° th 19.3-19.7GHzFixed-satellite -11513A -115 +0.5(0-5)13A-10513A 1MHz 22.55- (space-to-Earth) 23.55GHz Earthexploration- 24.45- satellite(space-to- 24.75GHz Earth) 25.25-27.5GHz Inter-satellite 27.500- Spaceresearch 27.501GHz (space-to-Earth) 21.4-22.0GHzBroadcasting- -11514bis-115+0.5(0-5)14bis-10514bis1MHz satellite (space-to-Earth) 31.0-31.3GHzSpaceresearch -115 -115 +0.5(0-5) -105 1 34.7-35.2GHz MHz (space-to-Earth transmissions referredtoin No.5.550on theterritories ofcountries listedin No.5.549) 14";.< 21.16.X TheselimitsshallapplyonlyonterritoriesofRegion2countries. Reasons:SharingbetweensatelliteservicesinRegions1and3andterrestrialservicesinRegion 2canbeimplementedmostsimplythroughpowerfluxdensity(pfd)limitsspecifiedinArticle21, SectionV.TheproposedpfdvaluesareconsistentwithRecommendationITU-RBO.I776.Itis 24 importanttorecognizethatITU-RBO.1776isreferencedinResolutions 525(Rev.WRC-07)and 551(Rev.WRC-07).Itisalsoimportanttorecognizethatthesesamepfdvaluesareappliedto theBSSsystemsthatwereintroducedinthe21.4-22.0GHzbandpriorto1April2007.The proposedmodificationwouldprovideregulatorycertaintytosatelliteservicesasadefinedsetof pfdlimitswouldbeknownandextensivecoordinationwithuncertainoutcomewouldnotbe required.Theproposedmodificationwouldalsoreducetheadministrativeburdenfor administrationsinallRegions. 25 DOCUMENTWAC/048(Ol.09.09) UnitedStatesofAmerica DRAFTPROPOSALSFORTHEWORKOFTHECONFERENCE AgendaItem1.7: toconsidertheresultsof[TU-RstudiesinaccordancewithResolution222 (Rev. WRC-07) inordertoensurelong-termspectrumavailabilityandaccesstospectrumnecessaryto meetrequirementsfortheaeronauticalmobile-satellite(R)service,andtotakeappropriateactiononthis subject,whileretainingunchangedthegenericallocationtothemobile-satelliteserviceinthebands 1525-1559 MHzand1626.5-[660.5MHz. Background Themobilesatelliteserviceallocationsin1525-1559MHzand1626.5-1660.5MHzcontinuetosupport valuablecommunicationsrequirementsandareneededtoaddressthefuturecommunicationsrequirements forcommercialMSSaswellasGlobalMaritimeDistressandSafetySystemandaeronauticalmobile satelliteservice(R)service(AMS(R)S)requirements. TheMSSallocationswithassociatedfootnoteprovisions,providingpriorityandpreemptiveaccesstothe MSSsystemsforcommunicationstosupportAMS(R)S,haveallowedsufficientflexibilitytosatisfythe AMS(R)Scommunicationsrequirementsinthisband.ThereisnoneedtomodifytheMSSallocations andtheassociatedfootnoteregulatoryprovisionsforAMS(R)S. TheUSAproposesNoChange(NOC)totheTableofAllocationsfortheMSSallocationsinthe1525- 1559MHzand1626.5-1660.5MHzandtheassociatedfootnoteregulatoryprovisionsforAMS(R)S. 26 Proposal: USA/xx/1Noe
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2188A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2188A1.txt
  • of 4.8 Terabits per second (Tbps). The system can be expanded to a total of 8 fiber pairs with total capacity of up to 7.68 Tbps. The individual parties will own and manage fiber pairs: Pacnet will have two fiber pairs; GU Holdings will have one fiber pair; and, Bharti Airtel, Global Transit, KDDI, and SingTel will each have one-half (0.5) fiber pair. The primary Network Operations Center ("NOC") for the Unity Cable System will be located in Singapore and managed by SingTel. The Singapore NOC will have primary responsibility for the operation and administration of those portions of the cable system located outside the United States and will have secondary responsibility for those portions located in U.S. territory. A second,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2188A1_Rcd.pdf
  • of 4.8 Terabits per second (Tbps). The system can be expanded to a total of 8 fiber pairs with total capacity of up to 7.68 Tbps. The individual parties will own and manage fiber pairs: Pacnet will have two fiber pairs; GU Holdings will have one fiber pair; and, Bharti Airtel, Global Transit, KDDI, and SingTel will each have one-half (0.5) fiber pair. The primary Network Operations Center ("NOC") for the Unity Cable System will be located in Singapore and managed by SingTel.The Singapore NOC will have primary responsibility for the operation and administration of those portions of the cable system located outside the United States and will have secondary responsibility for those portions located in U.S. territory. A second, fully
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2194A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2194A1.txt
  • L.Egan,"ImprovingRuralTelecommunicationsInfrastructure",TVARuralStudies, http://www.rural.orglworkshops/ruraltelecom/egan/4.htm 2OutsidePlanConsultingInc.;companywebsites 3CANARIEInc.,"CommunityCondoFiberNetworks",February2001,http://www.canarie.calcanet4/Iibrarylcustomer/ccfn.pdf 4Assume50%costshareonthehighend.Alarge-scaleinstallationwouldhavelowercostspersite,asmanycableswouldservemultiplesites 4 PRELIMINARY Investmentcostsof$0.7-1.7b'llIionto'Installfiberfor870/0ofpublic librariescurrentlyw'lthoutfiber Publiclibraries Thousandsoflocations;Percentwithingeography $Thousands $Billions Low-end High-end Low-end High-end Population fibercost fibercost totalfiber totalfiber densityl Total Withfiber2 Needsfiber persite3 persite3 cost cost DenseUrban 1 0.3(30%) 0.7 15 65 <0.1 <0.1 Urban 2 0.6(30%) 1.4 15 65 <0.1 0.1 Suburban 6 0.9(15%) 5.1 35 205 0.2 1.0 Rural 8 0.4(5%) 7.6 65 654 0.5 0.5 Total 17 2.2(13%) 14.8 15-205 & I _._.. 1Determinedbyzipcodepopulationdensity:Rural:<1,000personspersquaremile,Suburban:between1,000and4,000,Urban:between 4,OQOand10,000,andDenseUrban:>10,000.Somelocations(305hospitalsand446libraries)didnotmatchzipcodesinthemostrecent GIS 2Ofthe2,229libraryoutletsthatreportedaFiberconnection41%areurban(908),41%aresuburban(905),16%arerural(366),and2%are unknown(50); GatesFoundation/LRW-NationalBroadbandAssessment,2009. 3Low-endcostbasedonaerialinstallationwith30%newpoles,whilehigh-endcostassumes40%aerialand60%trenching 4Low-endcostsassumedheresincetrenchingwouldbecost-prohibitive;othertechnologieslikelymorerelevantifnotaerialfiber 5
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2196A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2196A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2196A1.txt
  • engineering solutions to resolve mutual exclusivity. For additional information, contact Lisa Scanlan, Thomas Nessinger, Susan Crawford or Ann Gallagher of the Audio Division at (202) 418-2700. This Public Notice contains the following Attachment: Attachment A: Supplemental 84 MX Applications FCC NOTICE REQUIRED BY THE PAPERWORK REDUCTION ACT The public reporting for this collection of information is estimated to range from 0.5 to 3 hours per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the required data, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. If you have any comments on these burden estimates, or on how we can improve the collection(s) and reduce the burden(s) they cause you, please write to Cathy Williams, Federal Communications
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-250A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-250A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-250A1.txt
  • application to the instant case, we now examine whether the County's proposed operations would protect other stations from harmful interference. Each application for TIS must be accompanied by a statement certifying that the proposed station satisfies the minimum separation distances specified in Section 90.242(a)(2)(i). Specifically, the proposed station must be located at least 15 kilometers (9.3 miles) outside the measured 0.5 mV/m service contour of any broadcast station operating on the first adjacent channel, or at least 130 kilometers (80.6 miles) for broadcast stations operating on a co-channel basis. The County provided an engineering analysis indicating that its closest TIS station would be located 31 kilometers from the 0.5 mV/m service contour of first adjacent channel Station WPTX, Lexington Park, Maryland,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2627A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2627A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2627A1.txt
  • noncommercial licensees did not have minimum hour requirements. Approximately nine months passed before AERS alerted the Commission to KWMD's silence. File No. BPED-20040312AAA (granted July 30, 2004; expired July 30, 2007. Permit cancelled.) File No. BSTA-20040621ACV (granted August 3, 2004; expired November 3, 2004). AERS' original CP authorized it to operate KWMD at Kasilof with effective radiated power (``ERP'') of 0.5 kilowatts. The license to cover authorized .31 kW. CP BPED-20040312AAA authorized a change in transmitter site, a change in frequency and ERP of 4 kilowatts. This STA permits operation of KWMD with .31 kilowatts. File No. BLSTA-20040824AGX (granted August 26, 2004; expired February 26, 2005). File No. BSTA-20050928AJX (expired January 26, 2006). AERS stated in its September 2005 STA that
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2633A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2633A1.txt
  • bands, including 450-470 MHz, 806-849 MHz and 851-894 MHz. The Association states that the TETRA standard meets all Part 90 requirements except for those pertaining to occupied bandwidth and emission masks. It seeks a waiver of Section 90.209(b)(5) which authorizes operations at an occupied bandwidth of up to 20 kHz, noting that the occupied bandwidth of TETRA equipment is 21.5 0.5 kHz. The Association also seeks a waiver of Section 90.210(b)(c) and (g) of the Commission's rules governing emission masks B, C, and G to allow for up to 5dB excursions around 10 kHz offset from the center frequency. The Association states that the ETSI standard relies on a measure of adjacent channel coupled power, rather than an occupied bandwidth limit
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-53A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-53A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-53A1.txt
  • (in MHz) Percentage of Subscribers by Capacity of Cable System Serving Their Community, January 1, 2006 2005 January 1, 2006 More than 750 MHz 750 MHz 331 - 749 MHz 330 or Less MHz Mean N Mean S.E. Mean S.E. Mean S.E. Mean S.E. Mean S.E. Sample groups overall 736 751 749 3.7 25.4% 1.9 63.9% 2.0 8.7% 1.1 2.1% 0.5 Noncompetitive Communities 734 433 747 4.2 25.5% 2.1 63.3% 2.2 8.9% 1.2 2.3% 0.6 Communities relieved from rate regulation 754 318 765 4.9 24.9% 2.7 68.0% 2.8 6.7% 1.6 0.4% 0.4 2nd cable operator subgroup (overall) 756 106 759 5.6 13.7% 3.6 82.1% 4.1 4.2% 2.4 0.0% 0.0 2nd cable operator subgroup (incumbents) 757 53 753 6.9 11.3% 4.4 83.0%
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-54A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-54A1.txt
  • which cellular service licensees will no longer be required to provide analog service.559 The Twelfth Report estimated that almost all wireless subscribers were digital subscribers at the end of 2006, with approximately one percent or less being analog-only mobile telephone subscribers.560 In filings made with the Commission in conjunction with the analog sunset, both Verizon Wireless and AT&T reported that 0.5 percent of their respective customer bases were 555 The nationwide penetration rate is calculated by dividing total mobile telephone subscribers by the total U.S. population. According to the Bureau of the Census, the combined population of the 50 states, the District of Columbia, and Puerto Rico as of July 1, 2007 was estimated to be 305.6 million. See U.S. Census
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-843A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-843A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-843A1.txt
  • the prior round. The additional percentage is determined as one plus the activity index times a minimum percentage amount, with the result not to exceed a given maximum. The additional percentage is then multiplied by the provisionally winning bid amount to obtain the minimum acceptable bid for the next round. The Bureau proposes initially to set the weighting factor at 0.5, the minimum percentage at 0.1 (10%), and the maximum percentage at 0.3 (30%). Hence, at these initial settings, the minimum acceptable bid for a license will be between ten percent and thirty percent higher than the provisionally winning bid, depending upon the bidding activity for the license. Equations and examples are shown in Attachment C. Additional Bid Amounts Any additional
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-843A1_Rcd.pdf
  • from the prior round.43The additional percentage is determined as one plus the activity index times a minimum percentage amount, with the result not to exceed a given maximum. The additional percentage is then multiplied by the provisionally winning bid amount to obtain the minimum acceptable bid for the next round. The Bureau proposes initially to set the weighting factor at 0.5, the minimum percentage at 0.1 (10%), and the maximum percentage at 0.3 (30%). Hence, at these initial settings, the minimum acceptable bid for a license will be between ten percent and thirty percent higher thanthe provisionally winning bid, depending upon the bidding activity for the license. Equations and examples are shown in Attachment C. b. Additional Bid Amounts 44.Any additional
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1169A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1169A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1169A1.txt
  • Florida, Georgia, Idaho, Illinois, Kansas, Maine, Massachusetts, Missouri, New Hampshire, New York, Ohio, Oklahoma, Pennsylvania, Vermont, Virginia, and Washington. FairPoint lists 51 subsidiaries organized under the laws of Delaware, Idaho, Florida, Illinois, Kansas, Maine, Missouri, New York, Ohio, Oklahoma, Pennsylvania, Virginia, and Washington. FairPoint does not wholly own one subsidiary, Sunflower Telephone Company, Inc. Two shares, accounting for less than 0.5 percent of the ownership interests in that entity, are held by a third party. FairPoint Communications, Inc., et al., Ch. 11, Case No. 09-16335, Order Confirming the Joint Chapter 11 Plan of Reorganization of FairPoint Communications, Inc. and its Debtor Affiliates (Bank. S.D.N.Y. May 14, 2010) (Plan of Reorganization). These investment vehicles ``will include: (i) thirteen investment funds (`AG Funds')
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1348A1_Rcd.pdf
  • Austria's population is concentrated on eastern lowlands because of steep slopes, poor soils and low temperatures. The terrain in the west and south is mostly mountains (Alps) and mostly flat or gently sloping along the eastern and northern margins. Subscriptions per 100 people Access per 100 people Total Subscribers Total Fiber Cable DSL Other 54.5 1,821,000 21.8 0.1 6.8 14.5 0.5 3. Belgium Regulation:National telecommunications goals and policy objectives are set by the Ministère des Communications et de l'Infrastructure.18 The independent regulator is the Institut Belge des Services Postaux et des Télécommunications (IBPT).19 Belgium first mandated local-loop unbundling in October 2000,20 but alternative operators have historically used bitstream access to provision DSL services. The guidelines for bitstream access are outlined in
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1408A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1408A2.txt
  • bb) cc) Limits (kHz) 4 175.25 6 266.25 8 341.75 12 421.75 16 618.75 18 870 22 241.75 25 161.25 Frequencies (paired) assignable to ship stations for narrow-band direct- printing (NBDP) telegraphy and data transmission systems at speeds not exceeding 100 Bd for FSK and 200 Bd for PSK d) j) m) p) 4 172.56 to 4 181.578 185 f. 0.5 kHz 6 2636.5 to 6 275.568.5 25 f. 0.5 kHz Limits (kHz) 4 178.25 6 268.75 8 341.75 12 421.75 16 618.75 18 870 22 241.75 25 161.25 Frequencies assignable to ship stations for data transmission d) p) aa) bb) cc) Limits (kHz) 4 181.75 6 275.75 8 341.75 12 421.75 16 618.75 18 870 22 241.75 25 161.25 Table
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1408A2_Rcd.pdf
  • to ship stations for data transmission d) p) aa) bb) cc) Limits (kHz) 4175.25 6 266.25 8341.75 12421.75 16618.75 18870 22241.75 25161.25 Frequencies (paired) assignable to ship stations for narrow-band direct- printing (NBDP) telegraphy and data transmission systems at speeds not exceeding 100 Bd for FSK and 200 Bd for PSK d) j) m) p) 4172.56 to 4181.578 185 f. 0.5 kHz 62636.5 to 6275.568.5 25 f. 0.5 kHz Limits (kHz) 4178.25 6268.75 8341.75 12421.75 16618.75 18870 22241.75 25161.25 Frequencies assignable to ship stations for data transmissiond)p) aa) bb) cc) Limits (kHz) 4 181.75 6 275.75 8341.75 12421.75 16618.75 18870 22241.75 25161.25 Table of frequencies (kHz) to be used in the band between 4000 kHz and 27500 kHz allocated exclusively to
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1408A3.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1408A3.txt
  • bb) cc) Limits (kHz) 4 175.25 6 266.25 8 341.75 12 421.75 16 618.75 18 870 22 241.75 25 161.25 Frequencies (paired) assignable to ship stations for narrow-band direct- printing (NBDP) telegraphy and data transmission systems at speeds not exceeding 100 Bd for FSK and 200 Bd for PSK d) j) m) p) 4 172.56 to 4 181.578 185 f. 0.5 kHz 6 2636.5 to 6 275.568.5 25 f. 0.5 kHz Limits (kHz) 4 178.25 6 268.75 8 341.75 12 421.75 16 618.75 18 870 22 241.75 25 161.25 Frequencies assignable to ship stations for data transmissiond) p) aa) bb) cc) 13 Limits (kHz) 4 181.75 6 275.75 8 341.75 12 421.75 16 618.75 18 870 22 241.75 25 161.25 Table
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1408A3_Rcd.pdf
  • assignable to ship stations for data transmissiond) p) aa) bb) cc) Limits (kHz) 4175.25 6 266.25 8341.75 12421.75 16618.75 18870 22241.75 25161.25 Frequencies (paired) assignable to ship stations for narrow-band direct- printing (NBDP) telegraphy and data transmission systems at speeds not exceeding 100 Bd for FSK and 200 Bd for PSK d) j) m) p) 4172.56 to 4181.578 185 f. 0.5 kHz 62636.5 to 6275.568.5 25 f. 0.5 kHz Limits (kHz) 4178.25 6268.75 8341.75 12421.75 16618.75 18870 22241.75 25161.25 Frequencies assignable to ship stations for data transmissiond)p) aa) bb) cc) 10270 Limits (kHz) 4 181.75 6 275.75 8341.75 12421.75 16618.75 18870 22241.75 25161.25 Table of frequencies (kHz) to be used in the band between 4000 kHz and 27500 kHz allocated exclusively
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1709A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1709A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1709A1.txt
  • County, Michigan] at 43 5314 N 840651 W.'' Furthermore, in a declaration, Midland board member Norman Moll states: On October 15, 2008, fellow-Church Board member Reid Tait and I visited the unincorporated area known as Mount Forest, Michigan . . . . As shown on [a yahoo] map, Mount Forest lies along a road named Main Street, stretching for about 0.5 mile north from the intersection with West Mt. Forest Road. The area is rural in nature, sparsely populated and has no defined boundaries. I observed not more than approximately 15 residences throughout the Mount Forest are. Upon a thorough review of the entire area, I observed no presently active commercial, religious, social or governmental establishments in Mount Forest . .
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2060A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2060A2.txt
  • antenna sizes and corresponding gains of the UA CS Earth Station and UA Earth Station antennas. UA CS Earth station antennas should be sized to achieve the availability defined in b) for the rain rates experienced at their location d), as well as the other technical requirements cited in this Annex. The minimum UA Earth Station antenna diameter should be 0.5 meters (20/30GHz) and 0.8 meters (12/14GHz). Maximum UA Earth Station antenna diameters are limited by the size and weight constraint of the UA airframe, so maximum diameters of 1.2m are anticipated The peak antenna gain values to be used in UAS Control Link performance calculations using the aforementioned antenna diameters and frequencies are provided below: 14GHz UA antenna transmit gain
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2060A2_Rcd.pdf
  • antenna sizes and corresponding gains of the UA CS Earth Station and UA Earth Station antennas. UA CS Earth station antennas should be sized to achieve the availability defined in b) for the rain rates experienced at their location d), as well as the other technical requirements cited in this Annex. The minimum UA Earth Station antenna diameter should be 0.5 meters (20/30GHz) and 0.8 meters (12/14GHz). Maximum UA Earth Station antenna diameters are limited by the size and weight constraint of the UA airframe, so maximum diameters of 1.2m are anticipated The peak antenna gain values to be used in UAS Control Link performance calculations using the aforementioned antenna diameters and frequencies are provided below: 14GHz UA antenna transmit gain
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2298A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2298A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2298A1.txt
  • prior round. The additional percentage is determined as one plus the activity index times a minimum percentage amount, with the result not to exceed a given maximum percentage. The additional percentage is then multiplied by the provisionally winning bid amount to obtain the minimum acceptable bid for the next round. The Bureau proposes initially to set the weighting factor at 0.5, the minimum percentage at 0.1 (10%), and the maximum percentage at 0.3 (30%). Hence, at these initial settings, the minimum acceptable bid for a license will be between ten percent and thirty percent higher than the provisionally winning bid, depending upon the bidding activity for the license. Equations and examples of calculations are shown in Attachment B. Additional Bid Amounts
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2298A1_Rcd.pdf
  • prior round.24 The additional percentage is determined as one plus the activity index times a minimum percentage amount, with the result not to exceed a given maximum percentage. The additional percentage is then multiplied by the provisionally winning bid amount to obtain the minimum acceptable bid for the next round.25 The Bureau proposes initially to set the weighting factor at 0.5, the minimum percentage at 0.1 (10%), and the maximum percentage at 0.3 (30%). Hence, at these initial settings, the minimum acceptable bid for a license will be between ten percent and thirty percent higher than the provisionally winning bid, depending upon the bidding activity for the license. Equations and examples of calculations are shown in Attachment B. b. Additional Bid
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2346A2.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2346A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2346A2.txt
  • _Toc3979456}{\*\bkmkend _Toc4211776}{\*\bkmkend _Toc5012482}{\*\bkmkend _Toc5017554} {\*\bkmkend _Toc5017794}{\*\bkmkend _Toc5076205}{\*\bkmkend _Toc5159799}{\*\bkmkend _Toc9309261}{\*\bkmkend _Toc9309492}{\*\bkmkend _Toc11653017}{\*\bkmkend _Toc191949844}{\*\bkmkend _Toc280005076} \par }\pard\plain \ltrpar\ql \li0\ri0\widctlpar\wrapdefault\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\l in0\itap0 \rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs24\alang1025 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs24\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 {\rtlch\fcs1 \af0 \ltrch\fcs0 The NANPA web site shall be available 24 hours a day, 7 days a week. \par The web site shall be able to support up to 500 simultaneous users with an average holding time of 0.5 hours. }{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0 \ltrch\fcs0 \b \par }\pard\plain \ltrpar\s3\ql \li0\ri-180\sb180\sa80\sl280\slmult0\keepn\widctlpar\tx360\tqc\tx7920\wr apdefault\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\outlinelevel2\adjustright\rin-180\lin0\ itap0 \rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs20\alang1025 \ltrch\fcs0 \b\fs24\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 {\field{\*\fldinst {\rtlch\fcs1 \af0 \ltrch\fcs0 seq SectionNumber \\c \\* MERGEFORMAT }}{\fldrslt {\rtlch\fcs1 \af0 \ltrch\fcs0 \lang1024\langfe1024\noproof {\*\bkmkstart _Toc2773014} {\*\bkmkstart _Toc3032415}{\*\bkmkstart _Toc3030561}{\*\bkmkstart _Toc3625705}{\*\bkmkstart _Toc3631753}{\*\bkmkstart _Toc3783878}{\*\bkmkstart _Toc3966157}{\*\bkmkstart _Toc3975787}{\*\bkmkstart _Toc3979457}{\*\bkmkstart _Toc4211777} {\*\bkmkstart _Toc5012483}{\*\bkmkstart _Toc5017555}{\*\bkmkstart _Toc5017795}{\*\bkmkstart _Toc5076206}{\*\bkmkstart _Toc5159800}{\*\bkmkstart _Toc9309262}{\*\bkmkstart _Toc9309493}{\*\bkmkstart _Toc11653018}{\*\bkmkstart _Toc191949845} {\*\bkmkstart _Toc280005077}7}}}\sectd \marglsxn1627\margrsxn1627\margtsxn2160\margbsxn2160\binfsxn7\binsxn7\sb kodd\pgnrestart\linex0\footery1440\colsx0\sectdefaultcl\sftnbj {\rtlch\fcs1 \af0 \ltrch\fcs0 .}{\field{\*\fldinst {\rtlch\fcs1
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-372A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-372A2.txt
  • be protected Coordination threshold values GSO space stations Non-GSO space stations pfd (per space station) calculation factors (NOTE 2) pfd (per space station) calculation factors (NOTE 2) % FDP (in 1 MHz) (NOTE 1) P r dB/ degrees P r dB/ degrees 2 483.5-2 500 All cases ­ 146 dB(W/m2) in 4 kHz and ­ 128 dB(W/m2) in 1 MHz 0.5 ­ 1404 dB(W/m2) in 4 kHz and ­ 1226 dB(W/m2) in 1 MHz (NOTE 7) 0.65 NOTE 1 ­ The calculation of FDP is contained in § 1.2.2.1, using the reference FS parameters contained in § 1.2.2.2.1 and 1.2.2.2.3. The use of FDP threshold is limited to the case of digital FS systems. NOTE 2 ­ The following formula should
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-372A2_Rcd.pdf
  • service to be protected Coordination threshold values GSO space stations Non-GSO space stations pfd (per space station) calculation factors (NOTE 2) pfd (per space station) calculation factors (NOTE 2) % FDP (in 1 MHz) (NOTE 1) P r dB/ degrees P r dB/ degrees 2 483.5-2 500 All cases ­146 dB(W/m2) in 4 kHz and ­128 dB(W/m2) in 1 MHz 0.5 ­1404 dB(W/m2) in 4 kHz and ­1226 dB(W/m2) in 1 MHz (NOTE 7) 0.65 NOTE 1 ­ The calculation of FDP is contained in § 1.2.2.1, using the reference FS parameters contained in § 1.2.2.2.1 and 1.2.2.2.3. The use of FDP threshold is limited to the case of digital FS systems. NOTE 2 ­ The following formula should be used
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-695A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-695A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-695A1.txt
  • Rico band plan; next, the ESMR portion of the band plan; and last, the transition period in Puerto Rico. Band Plan Elements Applicable to the Non-ESMR Band Under the TA Proposal, the Puerto Rico band plan is similar to the band plan for non-border regions of the United States (U.S. Band Plan), except that the Expansion Band is increased by 0.5 megahertz by eliminating the lower 0.5 megahertz portion of the Guard Band. This places the Puerto Rico Expansion Band at 815-816.5/860-861.5 MHz, and the Puerto Rico Guard Band at 816.5-817/861.5-862 MHz. The band plan accommodates all non-ESMR incumbents in the non-ESMR portion of the band and no incumbent will be relocated more than once, except in the case of a
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-762A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-762A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-762A1.txt
  • In Regions 1 and 3 (except for Japan), in the band 8025-8400 MHz, the Earth exploration-satellite service using geostationary satellites shall not produce a power flux-density in excess of the following provisional values for angles of arrival ((), without the consent of the affected administration: -174 dB(W/m²) in a 4 kHz band for 0º ( ( ( 5º -174 + 0.5 (( - 5) dB(W/m²) in a 4 kHz band for 5º ( ( ( 25º -164 dB(W/m²) in a 4 kHz band for 25º ( ( ( 90º These values are subject to study under Resolution 124 (Rev.WRC-2000). (FCC) 5.463 Aircraft stations are not permitted to transmit in the band 8025-8400 MHz. 5.465 In the space research service, the use
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-849A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-849A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-849A1.txt
  • the prior round. The additional percentage is determined as one plus the activity index times a minimum percentage amount, with the result not to exceed a given maximum. The additional percentage is then multiplied by the provisionally winning bid amount to obtain the minimum acceptable bid for the next round. The Bureau proposes initially to set the weighting factor at 0.5, the minimum percentage at 0.1 (10%), and the maximum percentage at 0.3 (30%). Hence, at these initial settings, the minimum acceptable bid for a license will be between ten percent and thirty percent higher than the provisionally winning bid, depending upon the bidding activity for the license. Equations and examples are shown in Attachment B. Additional Bid Amounts The Bureau
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-849A1_Rcd.pdf
  • the prior round.42 The additional percentage is determined as one plus the activity index times a minimum percentage amount, with the result not to exceed a given maximum. The additional percentage is then multiplied by the provisionally winning bid amount to obtain the minimum acceptable bid for the next round.43 The Bureau proposes initially to set the weighting factor at 0.5, the minimum percentage at 0.1 (10%), and the maximum percentage at 0.3 (30%). Hence, at these initial settings, the minimum acceptable bid for a license will be between ten percent and thirty percent higher than the provisionally winning bid, depending upon the bidding activity for the license. Equations and examples are shown in Attachment B. b. Additional Bid Amounts 54.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-862A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-862A1.txt
  • concerning this Notice, contact the Satellite Division at 202-418-0719; TTY 202-418-2555. S2433 SAT-STA-20100430-00086 E Effective Date: 05/12/2010 Grant of Authority Special Temporary Authority SES Americom, Inc. On May 12, 2010, the Satellite Division granted the request of SES Americom, Inc. to conduct operations of the AMC-11 satellite in the conventional C-band (3700-4200 MHz space-to-Earth/5925-6425 MHz Earth-to-space) at locations up to 0.5 degrees to the east and west of its assigned orbital location of 131 W.L. for a period of 30 days, commencing May 20, 2010. S2422 SAT-STA-20100430-00089 E Effective Date: 05/11/2010 Grant of Authority Special Temporary Authority PanAmSat Licensee Corp. On May 11, 2010, the Satellite Division granted, with conditions, special temporary authority to PanAmSat Licensee Corp. for a period of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-862A1_Rcd.pdf
  • concerning this Notice, contact the Satellite Division at 202-418-0719; TTY 202-418-2555. S2433 SAT-STA-20100430-00086 E Effective Date: 05/12/2010 Grant of Authority Special Temporary Authority SES Americom, Inc. On May 12, 2010, the Satellite Division granted the request of SES Americom, Inc. to conduct operations of the AMC-11 satellite in the conventional C-band (3700-4200 MHz space-to-Earth/5925-6425 MHz Earth-to-space) at locations up to 0.5 degrees to the east and west of its assigned orbital location of 131 W.L. for a period of 30 days, commencing May 20, 2010. S2422 SAT-STA-20100430-00089 E Effective Date: 05/11/2010 Grant of Authority Special Temporary Authority PanAmSat Licensee Corp. On May 11, 2010, the Satellite Division granted, with conditions, special temporary authority to PanAmSat Licensee Corp. for a period of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1227A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1227A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1227A1.txt
  • 4622 (1991), Calvary Educational Broadcasting Network, Inc., Hearing Designation Order, 7 FCC Red 4037 (1992). It is Bureau policy generally not to grant a license renewal application for a station that is off the air. 47 U.S.C. § 309(f). For AM - 5 mV/m; for commercial FM - 3.16 mV/m; for noncommercial educational FM - 1.0 mV/m. For AM - 0.5 mV/m contour; for FM - 1.0 mV/m contour. . . See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1914. Estimated by the staff. The STA request specified an efficiency of 300 mV/m/km/kW; however, experience indicates that the efficiency of a long wire antenna is substantially less. See 47 CFR §§ 73.45(c), 73.51, 73.61(b). See 47 CFR § 1.1310. Special Temporary Authorizations by nature are
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1454A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1454A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1454A1.txt
  • stations can be less than one or contain a fraction of a station. For example, if a state segment consists of two census blocks and the first census block has 100 households and receives one broadcast station and the second census block also has 100 households but receives no broadcast stations, then the household-weighted average for this state segment is 0.5 (i.e., [(100 x 1) + (100 x 0)]/200 = 0.5), signifying that some households in the state segment do not receive any broadcast stations while others do. See also n. 116, infra. . See also Section III. B. For a more detailed discussion of how we used Nielsen data, see Section III. B. To clarify the content of Appendix A,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1455A2_Rcd.pdf
  • (1961 ) 466 (14 2) Wis cons in 180 2 14 Trav is (2009) 466 (14 2) Wis cons in 180 2 5 Trav is (2009) 528 (16 1) Wes t Vi rginia Yes 6 116 Herron (199 7) 535 (16 3) Wis cons in 180 2 20 Trav is (2009) 605- 1588 (184.4 ­ 484) ** Illinois Yes 13 0.5 5,465 Seets and Boh len (19 77) 627 (19 1) Florida Yes Red and wh ite l ights 1 1 617 Robert s an d T amborsk i (1993 ) 942 (28 7) Ten nes see Yes 19.75 253 Lask ey (1960,1962, 1963a,b, 1964, 1 967, 196 8, 1969a,b, 1971) , Goodpas ture (19 74a, b, 1975, 1976 , 1984,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1480A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1480A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1480A1.txt
  • selecting appropriate signal bandwidth and spreading factors; adjusting power to the antenna as a function of elevation and skew angles; and inhibiting transmission when those angles exceed specified thresholds. Panasonic asserts that eXConnect AES antenna 1-sigma pointing error will be less than 0.25 degree and that the controller will terminate AES transmission within 100 milliseconds if pointing error ever exceeds 0.5 degrees. Coordination with Satellite Operators. Panasonic proposes to operate the AESs to communicate via Intelsat's Galaxy 17 satellite, which is at the 91º W.L. orbital location. Aside from other satellites operated by Intelsat, SES Americom's AMC-3 satellite at 87° W.L. is the only other satellite within six degrees of Galaxy 17 that receives signals in the 14.0-14.5 GHz band from
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1480A1_Rcd.pdf
  • by airframe deformation and data latency. 16The skew angle is the angle between the long axis of a parabolic-reflector AES antenna with an elliptical aperture 12559 Federal Communications Commission DA 11-1480 asserts that eXConnect AES antenna 1-sigma pointing error will be less than 0.25 degree18and that the controller will terminate AES transmission within 100 milliseconds if pointing error ever exceeds 0.5 degrees. 7.Coordination with Satellite Operators. Panasonic proposes to operate the AESs to communicate via Intelsat's Galaxy 17 satellite, which is at the 91º W.L. orbital location.19Aside from other satellites operated by Intelsat, SES Americom's AMC-3 satellite at 87° W.L. is the only other satellite within six degrees of Galaxy 17 that receives signals in the 14.0-14.5 GHz band from earth
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1763A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1763A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1763A1.txt
  • cáþ¢- Š¡­X RÑ@ JŽ FF*''Z6tm )bÔ5 †>¤€¯­alñþßõ(c)Ÿ¤<~•Û5´/p- 9w(c)éíèiúŽ"4ZÄzN�h·7E7¹y6$c߃Ÿþ¸ hQ\ûxŽâÒúÒÛSÒÚÑnÛdr,ë ...Gs÷ýxíÛó -QÛÙÉ}§\?˜¾S('6=°HÏoʧû Rà Š Ž�F?¥[ø‹ _ sŸ` �´rFp9÷ sÏä žmÌE]XŒo# ý8&(c)iZÖ·-Ÿ (c)øNóV³°m* }€íø{Ð i­Þ XýyýjÀÖ5 3áÞtm(Yõ{€AŸ+-{Œò<~U çü ·8 ¿EEks ôòŸ?ú vŠÇµñV‰vû"Ôb ¨ª`jš|î(c) e¶yŒRË°gdK¹›è;Ö Ôâ€:ˆ|S§O(R) {wfï@ ÆsŽõ%÷‰tË ðq'�áN;dŒV_€¢k‡Ôµi9ktmÊ(c)>ƒ``üÇåW>Ñíì jË­i1]�µþì‹èídë·oªkðxv ) `G v€9o YM¥êzµ�Ħg ...ì5 b€0.5 ›Ôµ €xÛO-Q x‚ ˜ñÌŒ$òD¤ {×G\­å�¶³"F-6(‰ �î=GøWZþ)Ðã‡ÍmN¾Šr!ÍiOm Êl¸‰%_GPGëUmô=*ÚO2 ôë"­^ùo#Y-ôØÁXÕ× ç¥v• ­¥½œ ±\-ƒ§Ø?ˆ †¡"Ú\üA±ºŠå a �ô(fó c‚ ð­½#H´Ñ­ -PÞZÅsnÁâ•C)-•‹¬x?LÕî 6~‚³´O g ŸRI?Ò�ðý ÃDÆåúf¹¤ð, vnÆ(c)|.wnóC ¤Ûj7 Vú›jQëOö×Îù 2>¢¥¶Ð�õ(õ ^ê×"vöÙòcH¼´BqÏS``ÅU×ü-s¯N L(R)1ƒƒúÖM¿†µ ^Üj: Šl',q´Žpª 'Ú³ô]rÏ\‚Il‹â7ØÁ× Øý Yt ¨ÝEqo Œ�#...'è × Üö 9¼Ldº' PºËq8 €N Õ�^Õt �¤{˜ �Ûñ \²xkO...NÕ¸t Ü$ !d]"‡µs? œNî�(R)ÐÎrMr œÔ5 =SÇZUÅ''...ãÌjr¥y = ô è:tº ÏãX- ¡çƒíR^êVZz(c)¼ºŠ Àê F¨·Þê:zP s öõòä ì Þ•¢éú?tmö ,Ë�Ç$``Žƒš·uu
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1955A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1955A2.txt
  • the porting data to determine the diversion rates), for the profit margin([Begin Confidential Information] [End Confidential Information]percent for all firms), the LTE penetration ([Begin Confidential Informationi [End Confidential Information]percent for standalone AT&T and [Begin Confidential Information] [End Confidential Information]percent for T-Mobile), and we have also estimated the Economic Model allowing the costs of the other firms to increase and using -0.5 as the industry elasticity. In each case, the Economic Model predicts that unilateral effects alone will cause prices to be higher and output to be lower every year. C-24 Federal Communications Commission Table 12.Weighted Average National Price Differences and Output Relative to No Transaction Using Alternative Model Specifications connaenuai [End Confidential Informationj 52.Overall, the output and pricing predictions we obtain
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-284A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-284A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-284A1.txt
  • are lower in effective competition communities on a per channel basis (almost all the differences are statistically significant). As of January 1, 2009, average prices and price per channel were lower by 1.0 percent and 11.1 percent, respectively, in communities found to have effective competition due to the presence of a second operator (other than a wireless or DBS operator); 0.5 percent higher and 6.9 percent lower for incumbents in the second operator subgroup; 2.9 percent higher and 1.4 percent lower for communities with a finding based upon DBS market share; 0.5 percent higher and 4.2 percent lower in areas overlapped by a wireless MVPD operator; and 1.6 and 1.4 percent lower where operators met the low penetration test by serving
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-420A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-420A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-420A1.txt
  • the prior round. The additional percentage is determined as one plus the activity index times a minimum percentage amount, with the result not to exceed a given maximum. The additional percentage is then multiplied by the provisionally winning bid amount to obtain the minimum acceptable bid for the next round. The Bureau proposed to initially set the weighting factor at 0.5, the minimum percentage (floor) at 0.1 (10%), and the maximum percentage (ceiling) at 0.3 (30%). At these initial settings, the minimum acceptable bid for a license will generally be between ten percent and thirty percent higher than the provisionally winning bid, depending upon the bidding activity for the license. Equations and examples are shown in Attachment B. Additional Bid Amounts
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-420A1_Rcd.pdf
  • prior round.186 The additional percentage is determined as one plus the activity index times a minimum percentage amount, with the result not to exceed a given maximum. The additional percentage is then multiplied by the provisionally winning bid amount to obtain the minimum acceptable bid for the next round. 167. The Bureau proposed to initially set the weighting factor at 0.5, the minimum percentage (floor) at 0.1 (10%), and the maximum percentage (ceiling) at 0.3 (30%). At these initial settings, the minimum acceptable bid for a license will generally be between ten percent and thirty percent higher than the provisionally winning bid, depending upon the bidding activity for the license.187 Equations and examples are shown in Attachment B. b. Additional Bid
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-447A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-447A2.txt
  • 11.7-12.2 GHz (Region 2 GSO FSS) 1) See § 1 of Annex 1 to this Appendix; In the bands specified in No. 5.414A, the detailed conditions for the application of No. 9.14 are provided in No. 5.414A for MSS networks or 2) In the band 11.7-12.2 GHz (Region 2 GSO FSS): ­124 dB(W/(m2 · MHz)) for 0° 5 ­124 + 0.5 ( ­ 5) dB(W/(m2 · MHz)) for 5° < 25 ­114 dB(W/(m2 · MHz)) for > 25 where is the angle of arrival of the incident wave above the horizontal 1) See § 1 of Annex 1 to this Appendix 35 3) 7 125-7250 MHz (GSO MSS) 4) 10.5-10.55 GHz (GSO MSS) plane (degrees) 3) In the band 7 125-7
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-447A2_Rcd.pdf
  • 5.414A , the deta iled con diti ons for the a pplica tion of No. 9.14 are provide d in No. 5.41 4A for MS S networks or 2) In the band 1 1.7-1 2.2 GHz (Re gion 2 GSO FSS ): ­124 dB (W/ (m2 · MHz) ) fo r 0° d T d 5 q ­12 4 + 0.5 (T ­ 5) dB(W/( m2 · MH z)) for 5° < T d 25 q ­114 dB (W/ (m2 · MHz) ) fo r T > 2 5q where T is the angl e of arri val o f th e inci dent w ave abo ve t he hor izon tal 1) See § 1 of Anne x 1
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-543A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-543A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-543A1.txt
  • $1.033 million, which is approximately 45% of IPSAN's total proposed rebanding costs of $2.295 million.'' IPSAN's Position. IPSAN submits that there are several reasons for not retaining the pre-rebanding channels in the mobile data radios. It states that ``rebanding will require that 12 additional MFR channels be loaded into each end unit,'' and that ``[a]t an agreed scan time of 0.5 seconds per channel, the parties agree that the scan time could be increased by up to six seconds.'' IPSAN submits that ``[a]lthough it has been noted that the units will first scan the Dynamic List, the fact is that the Dynamic List will also be adversely affected by rebanding.'' IPSAN explains that ``[t]his is because the Network Controller Configuration, which
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-732A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-732A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-732A1.txt
  • 75 8344300 436 309323 37228 34 UKK South West 73 5193600 217 165438 31985 30 UKL Wales 67 2986700 144 77554 26027 30 UKM Scotland 63 5156500 66 173660 33763 37 UKN Northern Ireland 42 1767100 124 48867 27786 32 US0 United States 63 309280117 33 14165565 46588 US01 Alabama 48 4661900 35 170014 36469 20 US02 Alaska 73 1366454 0.5 47912 69813 24 US04 Arizona 67 6500180 22 248888 38289 23 US05 Arkansas 51 2855390 21 98331 34437 17 US06 California 67 36756666 91 1846760 50243 27 US08 Colorado 68 4939456 18 248603 50330 32 US09 Connecticut 70 3501252 279 216174 61742 33 US10 Delaware 66 873092 173 61828 70815 25 US11 Dist. of Columbia 66 591833 3722 97235 164295
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-732A1_Rcd.pdf
  • 75 8344300 436 309323 37228 34 UKK South West 73 5193600 217 165438 31985 30 UKL Wales 67 2986700 144 77554 26027 30 UKM Scotland 63 5156500 66 173660 33763 37 UKN Northern Ireland 42 1767100 124 48867 27786 32 US0 United States 63 309280117 33 14165565 46588 US01 Alabama 48 4661900 35 170014 36469 20 US02 Alaska 73 1366454 0.5 47912 69813 24 US04 Arizona 67 6500180 22 248888 38289 23 US05 Arkansas 51 2855390 21 98331 34437 17 US06 California 67 36756666 91 1846760 50243 27 US08 Colorado 68 4939456 18 248603 50330 32 US09 Connecticut 70 3501252 279 216174 61742 33 US10 Delaware 66 873092 173 61828 70815 25 US11 Dist. of Columbia 66 591833 3722 97235 164295
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-732A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-732A2.txt
  • 6 Canada Bell Camada Incumbent Fibe 12 FTTx 12 Federal Communications Commission DA 11-732 Canada Bell Camada Incumbent Fibe 16 FTTx 16 Canada Bell Camada Incumbent Bundle 2 Fibe 16 FTTx 16 Canada Bell Camada Incumbent Bundle 3 Fibe 16 and Digital Basic Plus FTTx 16 Canada Bell Camada Incumbent Fibe 25 FTTx 25 Canada Rogers CommunicationsEntrant Ultra-Lite Internet Cable 0.5 Canada Rogers CommunicationsEntrant Lite Internet Cable 3 Canada Rogers CommunicationsEntrant Express Internet Cable 10 Canada Rogers CommunicationsEntrant Extreme Internet Cable 15 Canada Rogers CommunicationsEntrant Rocket Mobile No Term wireless 3G 21 Canada Rogers CommunicationsEntrant Rocket Mobile No Term wireless 3G 21 Canada Rogers CommunicationsEntrant Rocket Mobile with Flex Rate wireless 3G 21 Canada Rogers CommunicationsEntrant Rocket Mobile with Flex Rate
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-816A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-816A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-816A1.txt
  • the occupational limit fence around the perimeter of this site with warning signs to enclose the area below occupational limits but above public exposure RFR limits. As such the occupational RFR limits apply inside the inner fence. Public limits apply outside the outer fence. The maximum RFR reading at the site was 0.89 milliwatts/cm2 along the north inner fence at 0.5 meters from the ground. Levels along the other inner fence borders ranged from 0.13 milliwatts/cm2 to 0.32 milliwatts/cm2. Additionally, one location outside the inner fence showed a reading of 0.79 milliwatts/cm2. This was 5 meters west northwest of the northwest corner of the fenced area at 0.5 meters from ground level. This was the highest level between the two fence
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-377A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-377A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-377A1.txt
  • 15.4 15.0 17.2 17.5 HD digital versions 3.8 3.6 4.1 3.8 6.4 4.3 4.1 3.6 Multicast channels 6.6 5.5 9.0 9.9 8.1 9.6 8.9 8.4 Total local broadcast 24.0 21.1 29.8 28.7 29.9 28.9 30.2 29.5 PEG 3.6 3.4 4.1 4.0 5.9 4.3 4.2 2.6 Leased access 1.1 1.0 1.2 1.7 0.6 1.5 1.2 0.8 Regional sports 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.5 0.2 0.5 0.2 0.3 Other 12.0 11.6 12.7 15.0 6.3 13.5 12.6 10.5 Total 41.0 37.4 48.1 49.9 42.9 48.7 48.5 43.6 Source: Survey. Table 6 reports the number of regional sports networks (RSNs) included in service offerings. Overall, the average is 0.2 RSN channel on basic service, 2.1 channels on expanded basic service, and 2.3 on the next most
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-646A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-646A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-646A1.txt
  • additional variables that were ultimately excluded from the final model because they were not significant for either capex or opex. In its Capex Study, NRIC found that rain frequency increased construction cost per household. Following NRIC's model, we used the Samson weather station data, and for each study area, calculated the average number of days per year with greater than 0.5 inches of rainfall (DaysAbvPt5). We found DaysAbvPt5 was not significant in either regression. We also tested the average slope in study areas (slope) using data in the STATSGO2 database. Our hypothesis was that the steeper the slope, the more difficult it would be to build and maintain cabling. The coefficient on slope was insignificant (i.e., statistically indistinguishable from zero) in
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-705A2.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-705A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-705A2.txt
  • Asked Questions (FAQs), and an email link to the contractor as well as contact information (including telephone numbers) for all appropriate staff members. Availability and Access The web site shall be available 24 hours per day, seven (7) days a week. The web site shall be able to support up to 600 simultaneous users with an average holding time of 0.5 hours. System Responsiveness Rapid response shall be required when accessing the web site. The contractor shall provide a system such that a 56 KBPS modem-equipped user will be able to view the complete home page in less than eight (8) seconds 95% of the time over any 12 month period. If a user is experiencing greater than 12 seconds to
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-861A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-861A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-861A1.txt
  • Bureau next considered whether the proposed space station was capable of operating with an adjacent 17/24 GHz satellite less than four degrees away. In this regard, the Bureau noted that DIRECTV had provided an interference analysis pursuant to Section 25.140(b)(4)(iii) of the Commission's rules, in which DIRECTV calculated that its proposed offset operations would create the potential for up to 0.5 dB more interference to co-frequency adjacent space stations, and proposed to reduce its power to result in lower PFD. The Bureau then used a formula that it had applied in prior 17/24 GHz BSS grants at offset locations to calculate the reduction in power necessary for DIRECTV RB-2 to operate compatibly with adjacent satellites. The Bureau found that DIRECTV RB-2
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-996A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-996A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-996A1.txt
  • for IP Relay, which will expire June 30, 2013. Pursuant to the 2007 TRS Rate Methodology Order, this rate is adjusted annually by an inflation factor and an efficiency factor, and includes any appropriate exogenous costs submitted by providers. The inflation factor is the Gross Domestic Product Price Index (GDP-PI), and the efficiency factor is the inflation factor minus a 0.5 percent adjustment to account for productivity gains. RLSA states that no claims of exogenous costs were submitted by IP Relay providers. The Compensation Rates for VRS As noted above, we adopt the current interim VRS rates and compensation structure for VRS, pending further action in the VRS reform proceeding. In the 2010-11 and 2011-12 Fund years, the Commission continued to
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-95-1733A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-95-1733A1.txt
  • any need for supplemental information in light of LAHI's state- 46 Petition for Section 403 Investigation of Loral Aerospace Holdings, Inc. at I (filed March 10, 1995). 47 Although Nevada DBS contends that its petition "supports an investigation by the full Commission," disposition of that petition is within the scope of the International Bureau's man date under 47 C.F.R. § 0.5 l(c) to "administer policies, rules, standards, and procedures for the authorization ... of ... domestic and international satellite systems." 48 The foreign ownership limitations in Section 100.11 are virtually identical to those in Subsection 310(b) of the Commu nications Act. Section 100.11 states that DBS authorizations shall not be granted to or held by any corporation with an alien officer
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-96-2165A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-96-2165A1.txt
  • on LHCP and MCI-F2 operating on RHCP. Consequently, MCI requests authorization to arrange its satellites within a cluster such that MCI-F1 will be located at 109.8 W.L. and MCI-F2 at 110.2 W.L. 4. MCI requests permission to employ senses of polarization opposite to those indicated in the ITU Region 2 Plan.7 MCI asserts that switching the polarization will provide a 0.5 to 1.0 dB advantage in the receive earth station performance.8 By this Order, subject to the conditions outlined below, we grant MCI's request to employ senses of polarization opposite to those indicated in the ITU Region 2 Plan. As stated in the MCI Order, we have 3 MCI Application at Appendix A-1. 4 MCI proposes to launch MCI-F1 in the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-97-1409A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-97-1409A1.txt
  • consolidating their responses to issues raised, this will eliminate the need for duplicative pleadings, reduce the burden on all parties to the proceeding, and conserve Commission resources. 9723 4. This action is taken pursuant to authority' found in Sections 4(i) and 303 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 154(i) and 303; and pursuant to Sections 0.5], 0.261 and 1.48 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.51, 0.261 and 1.48. Accordingly, IT IS "ORDERED that the OEMS Licensees may exceed the 25-page limitation in a consolidated opposition to petitions for reconsideration or clarification filed in the above captioned proceeding. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Peter F. (Sowney Chief, Internation Bureau 9724
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-97-2191A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-97-2191A1.txt
  • ld 7989 (3) TecJznicalQualifications FederalCommunicationsCommission DA97-2191 40. TheSDARS'OrderrequiresSOARSlicensees'systemstoprovide,ataminimum.full CONUScoverage.1:!3Inaddition,coveragetootherareasorterritoriesoftheUnitedStatesis stronglyencouraged,ifpractical.124CORadioproposesthatitstwogeostationarysatellitesat approximately800W.L.and1100W.L.,ataminimum,providecontinuousSOARStothe48 contiguousstatesoftheUnitedStates.Accordingly,CORadio'sproposedSOARSsystemcomplies withtheSDARSOrder'scoverage/servicearearequirements.125 41. TheSDARSOrderalsorequiresSOARSapplicantstoprovideinformationontheir servicelinkbudgetsinaccordancewithSection25.114(c)(9)oftheCommission'srules.126 Accordingtoitsamendment,CORadiowillprovideaservicelinkmarginof18dB.127. 42. TheSDARSOrdermandatesthat,attheveryleast,consumersshouldbeabletoaccess thecoveredservicesfromalllicensedSOARSsystemsviaasinglereceiver.128Therearesignificant differencesbetweenCORadio'sandAMRC'sproposedtransmissiontechnologiesthatmayaffect receiverinteroperability.However,initsamendment,CORadioexpresseditscommitmenttowork withallinterestedparties.toinsurethattheSOARSreceiverswillpermitcustomerstoaccessboth systems.129ConsideringthatSOARSreceiverinteroperabilityisintheinterestofconsumers,the industry,andthelicensees,CDRadio'slicenseisconditioneduponitscertificationtothe CommissionthatitsfinalreceiverdesignisinteroperablewiththeAMRCSOARS. 43. TheSDARSOrderrequiresapplicantstoidentifywhichcodingschemeandcoding rate(s)theyplantoimplementintheirSOARSsystems,andrequiresthoseSOARSsystemsthat intendtoofferaudioformatsotherthanCDqualitytobecapableoftransmittinglowerqualityaudio 123 Seealso§25.144(2)(i)([s]erviceofthe48statesoftheUnitedStatesisfullCONUS). 124 SOARSOrderat 99. 125 Amendmentat8. 126 SOARSOrderat 101. 127 Amendmentat26,Table.3. 128 SOARSat 106. 129 CORadioAmendmep.tat25. 7990. FederalCommunicationsCommission DA97-2191 atlowerdatarates.DOCDRadio'sSDARSsystemcomplieswiththeapplicabledata compression/codingrequirements.TheCDRadiosystem willusePerceptualAudioCoding(liPAC") algorithmtocompressCDqualityinformationstreamfrom1.44Mbpsto128Kbps.Theresulting datastreamwillbeconvolutionallyencodedwithhalf-rateK=7errorcoding,interleaved,dividedinto blocksandblock-errorencodedwith10percentdepthReed-Solomoncode.TheCDRadiosystem willbeabletoprovideapproximately30CDqualitystereochannels.Inaddition,five128Kbps channelswillbesubdividedinto32Kbpschannelstobeusedforvoiceprogramming.Standard voicecodecsl31willbeusedto'provide20FMaudio-qualitychannels.Flexibilitywillbemaintained onthesechannelssothattheycanbesubdividedfurther(i.e.,16Kbps,8Kbps,4Kbps,2Kbps,1 Kbps,0.5Kbps)toprovideauxiliaryservicessuchaspaging,lightaircraftweatheradvisory,GPS differentialdataandnationalemergencyalerting.Compressionofthistypeofinformationwouldbe use-specific.AtleastsomeofsuchauxiliaryservicedatawouldbeencodedusingLinearPredictive Coding("LPC,,).132 44. The SDARSOrderdoesnotsetaspecificPFDlimitonSDARS.Instead,the CommissionexpectsthatappropriatePFDlimitswillbeestablishedthroughinternational coordinationwithadjacentcountries.AccordingtoSection25.114(c)(lI)oftheCommission's rules,however,SDARSapplicantsarerequiredtoidentifyPFDattheEarth'ssurfacefromtheir spacecraft.133Initsamendmenttoitsapplication.CDRadiocomplieswiththeCommission'srulesby providing-thePFDwithinitscoveragearea.AlthoughtheborderPFDvalueiscriticalforpurposes ofinternationalcoordination,tocomplywiththeintentofSection25.114(c)(l1),andforthe purposesofdomesticcoordination,CDRadioshouldprovidemaximum(peak)PFDvaluewithinits coveragearea.CDRadiorecognizesthatthereportedPFDvalueswilltriggertherequirementto coordinatewithradiocommunicationssystemsofothercountries.IntheabsenceofasetofPFD limitsforthe2320-2332.5MHzband,CDRadio'slicensetoprovideSDARSisconditionedupon completionofsuccessfulcoordinationbetweentheCDRadioSDARSsystemandtheforeign systems. 45. The SDARSOrderrequiresSDARSlicenseestomeetout-of-bandandspurious emissionlimitscontainedinSection25.202(f)oftheCommission'srules.134Initstheamendmentto 130 SDARSOrderat 108. 131 Codecsisatennusedforcoderidecoder. 13: Amendmentat23. mSOARSOrderat 113and114. SDARSOrderat 118. 7991 FederalCommunicationsCommission DA97-2191 itslicenseapplication.CDRadioverifiesthatitsproposedsystemwillsuppressout-of-bandspurious emissionstothelevelsspecifiedinSection25.202(1).135Initsupdatedamendment,CDRadiostates thatitwillcoordinateitsSDARSsystemfrequencyuseinordertopreventthepotentialfor unacceptableinterference.I]/:> 46. TheSDARSOrderrequiresSDARSlicenseestoaccommodatetelemetrybeaconsfor theirsystemswithintheirexclusively-licensedbandwidth.butallowseachlicenseetheflexibilityto determinetheappropriateamountofspectrumnecessaryforitstelemetrybeacons.137CDRadio appearstocomplywiththisrequirementbylocatingitstelemetrybeaconswithinabandwidthof200 KHzat2320.25MHz.138 47. IntheSDARSOrder,theCommissionpermitsanSDARSlicensee.pursuanttoan agreementwiththeotherSDARSlicensee.totransmitoncross-polarizedfrequenciesinfrequency assignedtotheotherSDARSlicensee.TheCommissionstipulatedthatthepartieswhoreachsuch anagreementwouldberequiredtoapplytotheCommissionforagreementapproval.I39CDRadio statesthatatthistimeitdoesnotintendtoemploycross-polarizationwithinitsfrequencyassignment andwilloperateonleft-handcircularpolarization(ltLHCplt).CDRadioisrequiredtoapplytothe CommissionforapprovalofanychangefromitsuseofLHCP.I.JO 48. TheCommissionrecognizedintheSDARSOrderthattheSDARSsystemscannot operatewithoutsufficientfeeder-linkspectrum.TheSDARSOrder.therefore.identifiedthenon- congested7025-7075MHzfixedsatelliteservice("FSSIt)fi'equencybandasthespectrumforSDARS feeder-linkoperations.CDRadiohastentativelyidentified12.5MHzofspectrumforitsfeeder-link use.However.thisissubjecttolicensingandcoordination.TheSDARSOrderstatesthatthe
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-99-431A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-99-431A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-99-431A1.txt
  • rates with carriers in Brunei, Singapore, Taiwan, and other carriers that provide service in upper income countries, that satisfy the requirements of the Benchmarks Order. Background 3. AT&T Corp. (on behalf of itself, AT&T Alascom, AT&T Puerto Rico, and AT&T Virgin Islands) and MCI filed petitions to reduce their accounting rates for service with Singapore Telecom International Limited ("ST") from 0.5 SDR (about 70¢) per minute to 0.38 SDR (about 53¢) per minute for IMTS and from 0.62 SDR (about 87¢) per minute to 0.38 SDR (about 53¢) per minute for ISDN on December 1, 1998. AT&T Corp. (on behalf of itself, AT&T Alascom, AT&T Puerto Rico, and AT&T Virgin Islands) also filed a petition to reduce the accounting rate for
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-104945A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-104945A1.txt
  • total factor productivity (TFP) measurement.381 b. Discussion 286. The commenters generally repeat arguments made in the proceeding. For reasons explained in detail in our companion we conclude that we should prescribe an X-Factor on the basis of total factor productivity studies, the difference between LEC input price changes and input price changes in the economy as a whole, and the 0.5 percent consumer productivity dividend (CPD). In the companion order we find that this results in an X-Factor prescription of 6.5 percent. 380 NPRM at | 233. With respect to the productivity offset, we invited comment on, among other things, basing it on total factor productivity (TFP). TFP is the ratio of an index of a firm's total outputs to an
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-184137A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-184137A1.txt
  • N NC NE 080-31-41.2 W 0000062773 Cellco Partnership MONROE 11/17/1999 06004.50000 35-08-27.5 N NC NE 080-31-41.2 W 0000062773 Cellco Partnership MONROE 11/17/1999 06034.15000 35-08-27.5 N NC NE 080-31-41.2 W 0000062773 Cellco Partnership MONROE 11/17/1999 06063.80000 35-08-27.5 N NC NE 080-31-41.2 W 0000062773 Cellco Partnership MONROE 11/17/1999 06093.45000 35-08-27.5 N NC NE 081-50-19.4 W 0000062779 Cellco Partnership UNION MILLS 11/17/1999 05945.20000 35-35-00.5 N NC NE 081-50-19.4 W 0000062779 Cellco Partnership UNION MILLS 11/17/1999 06004.50000 35-35-00.5 N NC NE 081-50-19.4 W 0000062779 Cellco Partnership UNION MILLS 11/17/1999 06063.80000 35-35-00.5 N NC NE 081-50-19.4 W 0000062779 Cellco Partnership UNION MILLS 11/17/1999 06226.89000 35-35-00.5 N Page 8 CF - Common Carrier Fixed Point to Point Microwave State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-186816A1.pdf
  • Public Notice. Opposition to objections may be filed no later than 10 days after the original objection is filed. Responses to the opposition may be filed no later than 5 days after the time for filing an opposition has expired. A Apppplliiccaanntt FFiillee N Nuum mbbeerr C Coooorrddiinnaatteess D Daattee R Reecc''dd Unisite A0099667 25-54-10.6/80-19-43.2 10/04/99 SBA Towers, Inc. A0109382 36-10-0.5/82-44.2-23.711/26/99 Kansas City SMSA Limited A0112347 39-4-19.9/94-33-10.8 2/04/00 Partnership Cincinnati Bell Wireless,LLC A0111451 39-3-44.0/84-53-43.0 2/08/00 -FCC-
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-201656A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-201656A1.txt
  • W 0000100855 BACKLINK LLC Dallas 03/31/2000 22675.00000 32-54-51.5 N TX NE 096-52-45.0 W 0000100856 BACKLINK LLC Dallas 03/31/2000 22825.00000 32-54-38.0 N TX NE 096-52-34.0 W 0000100857 BACKLINK LLC Farmers Branch 03/31/2000 22525.00000 32-54-52.5 N TX NE 096-52-26.8 W 0000100858 BACKLINK LLC Dallas 03/31/2000 22975.00000 32-54-50.6 N TX NE 096-47-03.1 W 0000100859 BACKLINK LLC Dallas 03/31/2000 21625.00000 32-55-24.4 N TX NE 096-47-00.5 W 0000100860 BACKLINK LLC Dallas 03/31/2000 21525.00000 32-55-25.7 N TX NE 096-47-48.1 W 0000100861 BACKLINK LLC Dallas 03/31/2000 21775.00000 32-55-25.4 N TX NE 096-47-43.1 W 0000100862 BACKLINK LLC Dallas 03/31/2000 21225.00000 32-55-25.1 N TX NE 096-47-08.1 W 0000100863 BACKLINK LLC Dallas 03/31/2000 21325.00000 32-55-24.2 N TX NE 096-46-12.0 W 0000100864 BACKLINK LLC Dallas 03/31/2000 21425.00000 32-54-06.2 N TX NE 096-46-08.8
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-202023A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-202023A1.txt
  • BORDER PIPELINE COMPANY DAVENPORT 04/12/2000 06123.10000 41-38-58.1 N IA MD WPOT936 090-26-58.4 W 0000103151 NORTHERN BORDER PIPELINE COMPANY DAVENPORT 04/12/2000 06152.75000 41-38-58.1 N OH MD WLR625 082-01-32.5 W 0000106336 GTE MOBILNET OF OHIO LIMITED PARTNERSHIP GRAFTON 04/11/2000 06615.00000 41-16-17.2 N OH MD WLR625 082-01-32.5 W 0000106336 GTE MOBILNET OF OHIO LIMITED PARTNERSHIP GRAFTON 04/11/2000 10755.00000 41-16-17.2 N OH MD WLB360 081-50-00.5 W 0000106368 GTE MOBILNET OF OHIO LIMITED PARTNERSHIP STRONGSVILLE 04/11/2000 02123.20000 41-16-34.2 N OH MD WLB360 081-50-00.5 W 0000106368 GTE MOBILNET OF OHIO LIMITED PARTNERSHIP STRONGSVILLE 04/11/2000 06775.00000 41-16-34.2 N OH MD WLB360 081-50-00.5 W 0000106368 GTE MOBILNET OF OHIO LIMITED PARTNERSHIP STRONGSVILLE 04/11/2000 10855.00000 41-16-34.2 N NC MD WMJ750 078-53-41.0 W 0000106372 AMERICAN TELEVISION AND COMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION DURHAM 03/06/2000
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-202481A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-202481A1.txt
  • 05/05/2000 19425.00000 37-42-39.7 N PA NE 075-10-15.9 W 0000124632 Teligent License Company II, L.L.C. PHILADELPHIA 05/05/2000 19560.00000 39-57-11.2 N IL NE 087-53-56.7 W 0000124635 BACKLINK LLC DES PLAINES 05/05/2000 17840.00000 42-00-31.1 N IL NE 087-53-47.5 W 0000124636 BACKLINK LLC DES PLAINES 05/05/2000 18000.00000 42-00-33.6 N IL NE 087-50-16.9 W 0000124638 BACKLINK LLC PARK RIDGE 05/05/2000 17880.00000 41-59-13.2 N NJ NE 074-10-00.5 W 0000124640 BACKLINK LLC Newark 05/05/2000 21425.00000 40-44-05.6 N NJ NE 074-10-00.5 W 0000124640 BACKLINK LLC Newark 05/05/2000 21575.00000 40-44-05.6 N NJ NE 074-10-00.5 W 0000124640 BACKLINK LLC Newark 05/05/2000 21775.00000 40-44-05.6 N NJ NE 074-10-06.3 W 0000124641 BACKLINK LLC Newark 05/05/2000 22625.00000 40-44-06.1 N NJ NE 074-10-05.5 W 0000124642 BACKLINK LLC Newark 05/05/2000 22975.00000 40-44-08.1 N NJ NE 074-09-57.0
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-202973A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-202973A1.txt
  • BACKLINK LLC New York 05/24/2000 21325.00000 40-43-22.4 N NY AM 074-00-22.0 W 0000097087 BACKLINK LLC New York 05/24/2000 19640.00000 40-43-17.8 N NY AM 074-00-22.0 W 0000097087 BACKLINK LLC New York 05/24/2000 21525.00000 40-43-17.8 N TX AM 096-47-03.1 W 0000100859 BACKLINK LLC Dallas 05/24/2000 17880.00000 32-55-24.4 N TX AM 096-47-03.1 W 0000100859 BACKLINK LLC Dallas 05/24/2000 21625.00000 32-55-24.4 N TX AM 096-47-00.5 W 0000100860 BACKLINK LLC Dallas 05/24/2000 17960.00000 32-55-25.7 N TX AM 096-47-00.5 W 0000100860 BACKLINK LLC Dallas 05/24/2000 21525.00000 32-55-25.7 N TX AM 096-47-48.1 W 0000100861 BACKLINK LLC Dallas 05/24/2000 17920.00000 32-55-25.4 N TX AM 096-47-48.1 W 0000100861 BACKLINK LLC Dallas 05/24/2000 21775.00000 32-55-25.4 N TX AM 096-47-43.1 W 0000100862 BACKLINK LLC Dallas 05/24/2000 18000.00000 32-55-25.1 N TX AM 096-47-43.1
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-203818A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-203818A1.txt
  • W 0000176574 KATLINK LLC N MIAMI BEACH 06/26/2000 17960.00000 25-55-47.3 N IA NE 093-46-36.8 W 0000176590 United States Cellular Operating Company - Des Moines New Virginia 06/26/2000 06780.00000 41-11-07.5 N LA NE 090-04-18.1 W 0000176613 Teligent License Company II, L.L.C. NEW ORELANS 06/26/2000 18000.00000 29-57-11.8 N GA NE 084-20-56.8 W 0000177357 BACKLINK LLC ATLANTA 06/27/2000 17840.00000 33-55-11.4 N GA NE 084-19-00.5 W 0000177358 BACKLINK LLC ATLANTA 06/27/2000 17920.00000 33-55-04.5 N GA NE 084-21-07.8 W 0000177359 BACKLINK LLC ATLANTA 06/27/2000 17920.00000 33-54-14.5 N GA NE 084-20-25.5 W 0000177360 BACKLINK LLC DUNWOODY 06/27/2000 17840.00000 33-56-01.5 N GA NE 084-20-25.1 W 0000177361 BACKLINK LLC DUNWOODY 06/27/2000 17920.00000 33-55-55.9 N GA NE 084-19-02.0 W 0000177362 BACKLINK LLC DUNWOODY 06/27/2000 17840.00000 33-55-16.1 N MO NE 090-27-15.0
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-203902A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-203902A1.txt
  • 08/03/2010 Date Effective: 06/26/2000 Class of Station: Fixed Earth Stations Grant of Authority Nature of Service:Domestic Fixed Satellite Service SITE ID: 1 105 NORTH FOREMAN, CRAIG, VINITA, OK LOCATION: E900269 SES-RWL-20000613-00991 NATIONAL MINORITY TV, INC. Renewal 06/22/2000 - 06/22/2010 Date Effective: 06/26/2000 Class of Station: Fixed Earth Stations Grant of Authority Nature of Service:Domestic Fixed Satellite Service SITE ID: 1 0.5 KM W. OF INTERS. OF US RT. 71 & US, FRANKLIN, COLUMBUS, OH LOCATION: E900267 SES-RWL-20000613-00992 NATIONAL MINORITY TV, INC. Renewal 06/22/2000 - 06/22/2010 Date Effective: 06/26/2000 Class of Station: Fixed Earth Stations Grant of Authority Nature of Service:Domestic Fixed Satellite Service SITE ID: 1 ATOP SHINALL MOUNTAIN, PULASKI, LITTLE ROCK, AR LOCATION: Page 8 of 11 E900263 SES-RWL-20000615-00985 TRIDOM
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-203907A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-203907A1.txt
  • CA NE 117-12-04.7 W 0000168826 BACKLINK LLC SAN DIEGO 06/19/2000 19440.00000 32-53-37.0 N CA NE 121-58-42.2 W 0000168827 BACKLINK LLC SANTA CLARA 06/19/2000 19520.00000 37-23-02.6 N CA NE 121-59-21.1 W 0000168828 BACKLINK LLC SUNNYVALE 06/19/2000 17960.00000 37-23-05.5 N WI NE 088-10-26.6 W 0000168852 BACKLINK LLC WAUKESHA 06/19/2000 19440.00000 43-01-52.5 N WI NE 088-10-17.0 W 0000168853 BACKLINK LLC WAUKESHA 06/19/2000 17880.00000 43-02-00.5 N WI NE 088-10-17.0 W 0000168853 BACKLINK LLC WAUKESHA 06/19/2000 18080.00000 43-02-00.5 N WI NE 088-10-29.6 W 0000168854 BACKLINK LLC WAUKESHA 06/19/2000 19640.00000 43-01-52.0 N OH NE 084-28-12.5 W 0000171332 KATLINK LLC CINCINNATI 06/20/2000 19360.00000 39-16-55.1 N OH NE 084-28-12.5 W 0000171332 KATLINK LLC CINCINNATI 06/20/2000 19360.00000 39-16-55.1 N OH NE 084-28-12.5 W 0000171332 KATLINK LLC CINCINNATI 06/20/2000 19400.00000 39-16-55.1
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-204615A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-204615A1.txt
  • ATLANTA 07/26/2000 18000.00000 33-45-20.8 N MO NE 090-25-46.9 W 0000194646 KATLINK LLC St. Louis 07/26/2000 17920.00000 38-42-09.4 N WA NE 122-20-01.1 W 0000194695 BACKLINK LLC Seattle 07/26/2000 19560.00000 47-35-59.9 N Page 20 CF - Common Carrier Fixed Point to Point Microwave State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City WA NE 122-20-00.5 W 0000194696 BACKLINK LLC Seattle 07/26/2000 19480.00000 47-35-58.3 N WA NE 122-20-01.6 W 0000194697 BACKLINK LLC Seattle 07/26/2000 19680.00000 47-36-08.8 N OR NE 122-54-37.3 W 0000194709 AT&T Wireless Services of Florida, Inc. Springfiled 07/26/2000 06826.87500 44-07-30.4 N OR NE 123-17-58.4 W 0000194728 AT&T Wireless Services of Florida, Inc. Dallas 07/26/2000 06785.62500 44-53-47.4 N PA NE 080-00-23.6 W 0000194747 KATLINK LLC
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-204800A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-204800A1.txt
  • (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City MA NE 072-38-54.0 W 0000197333 Equal Access Networks LLC HOLYOKE 07/31/2000 11465.00000 42-14-28.0 N NJ NE 074-02-45.4 W 0000197356 BACKLINK LLC HACKENSACK 07/31/2000 18040.00000 40-52-46.2 N NJ NE 074-02-06.0 W 0000197357 BACKLINK LLC HACKENSACK 07/31/2000 17920.00000 40-53-55.3 N IL NE 087-40-36.0 W 0000197371 Teligent License Company II, L.L.C. CHICAGO 07/31/2000 19560.00000 41-54-37.0 N NJ NE 074-10-00.5 W 0000197376 Teligent License Company II, L.L.C. NEWARK 07/31/2000 21275.00000 40-44-05.6 N NJ NE 074-10-00.5 W 0000197376 Teligent License Company II, L.L.C. NEWARK 07/31/2000 21325.00000 40-44-05.6 N NJ NE 074-10-00.5 W 0000197376 Teligent License Company II, L.L.C. NEWARK 07/31/2000 21375.00000 40-44-05.6 N NJ NE 074-10-00.5 W 0000197376 Teligent License Company II, L.L.C. NEWARK 07/31/2000 21475.00000 40-44-05.6 N NJ NE 074-10-00.5
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-205050A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-205050A1.txt
  • 083-15-54.6 W 0000204034 GEORGIA RSA #11, INC. VALDOSTA 08/11/2000 10618.12500 30-54-11.2 N GA MD WPOS354 083-15-54.6 W 0000204034 GEORGIA RSA #11, INC. VALDOSTA 08/11/2000 10627.50000 30-54-11.2 N MA MD WPOR712 071-52-59.2 W 0000204064 WORCESTER TELEPHONE COMPANYOXFORD 08/11/2000 10643.12500 42-10-27.3 N LA MD WPQL493 090-31-36.5 W 0000204087 Louisiana RSA #7 Cellular General Partnership Kentwood 08/11/2000 06650.00000 30-56-39.9 N MA MD WHO996 071-13-00.5 W 0000204097 SOUTHWESTERN BELL MOBILE SYSTEMS, INC. ANDOVER 08/11/2000 10658.12500 42-39-14.0 N TX MD WLW311 098-38-37.9 W 0000204098 TEXAS RSA 9B1 LIMITED PARTNERSHIP DBA RANGER 08/11/2000 02118.40000 32-27-36.4 N TX MD WLW311 098-38-37.9 W 0000204098 TEXAS RSA 9B1 LIMITED PARTNERSHIP DBA RANGER 08/11/2000 02128.00000 32-27-36.4 N CA MD KMH74 121-46-17.9 W 0000204101 CITIZENS TELECOMMUNICATIONS COMPANY OF CALIFORNIA INC BURNEY 08/11/2000
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-205600A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-205600A1.txt
  • Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City OR RM KNKN411 123-11-16.4 W 0000213357 Verizon Wireless (VAW) LLC AMITY 09/01/2000 45-07-48.4 N OR RM KNKN411 123-11-16.4 W 0000213357 Verizon Wireless (VAW) LLC AMITY 09/01/2000 45-07-48.4 N OR RM KNKN411 123-11-16.4 W 0000213357 Verizon Wireless (VAW) LLC AMITY 09/01/2000 45-07-48.4 N OR RM KNKN411 123-49-00.5 W 0000213357 Verizon Wireless (VAW) LLC ASTORIA 09/01/2000 46-10-53.4 N OR RM KNKN411 123-12-50.4 W 0000213357 Verizon Wireless (VAW) LLC Carlton 09/01/2000 45-17-27.4 N OR RM KNKN411 123-53-50.5 W 0000213357 Verizon Wireless (VAW) LLC CHINOOK 09/01/2000 46-17-11.4 N OR RM KNKN411 123-12-39.4 W 0000213357 Verizon Wireless (VAW) LLC CLATSKANIE 09/01/2000 46-02-23.4 N OR RM KNKN411 123-10-50.4 W 0000213357 Verizon Wireless
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-205915A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-205915A1.txt
  • 09/11/2000 36-57-23.8 N CA RM KNKN346 120-02-03.6 W 0000216757 CALIFORNIA RSA NO. 4 LIMITED PARTNERSHIP MADERA 09/11/2000 36-57-23.8 N Page 34 CL - Cellular State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City CA RM KNKN346 119-47-41.5 W 0000216757 CALIFORNIA RSA NO. 4 LIMITED PARTNERSHIP MADERA 09/11/2000 37-00-34.8 N CA RM KNKN346 119-45-00.5 W 0000216757 CALIFORNIA RSA NO. 4 LIMITED PARTNERSHIP MADERA 09/11/2000 37-05-33.8 N CA RM KNKN346 120-37-09.6 W 0000216757 CALIFORNIA RSA NO. 4 LIMITED PARTNERSHIP MENDOTA 09/11/2000 36-38-15.8 N CA RM KNKN346 120-28-55.7 W 0000216757 CALIFORNIA RSA NO. 4 LIMITED PARTNERSHIP Merced 09/11/2000 37-18-08.8 N CA RM KNKN346 120-24-24.7 W 0000216757 CALIFORNIA RSA NO. 4 LIMITED PARTNERSHIP MERCED 09/11/2000 37-15-15.8 N
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-206274A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-206274A1.txt
  • LLC BOONE 09/26/2000 36-14-07.5 N TN RM KNKN631 081-57-40.4 W 0000225846 NC - 2 LLC BUNTONTOWN 09/26/2000 36-17-47.4 N NC RM KNKN631 082-17-48.5 W 0000225846 NC - 2 LLC BURNSVILLE 09/26/2000 35-56-17.4 N NC RM KNKN631 082-06-15.4 W 0000225846 NC - 2 LLC ESTATOE 09/26/2000 35-52-47.4 N NC RM KNKN631 081-25-35.3 W 0000225846 NC - 2 LLC GRANITE FALLS 09/26/2000 35-48-00.5 N NC RM KNKN631 081-33-04.4 W 0000225846 NC - 2 LLC Happy Valley 09/26/2000 35-58-31.5 N NC RM KNKN631 081-29-20.3 W 0000225846 NC - 2 LLC LENOIR 09/26/2000 35-54-25.5 N PA RM KNKN891 077-24-19.0 W 0000225865 GTE Wireless of the South IncorporatedCASTANEA 09/26/2000 41-07-14.0 N Page 38 CL - Cellular State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-206369A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-206369A1.txt
  • Wireless Fiber Corp. WASHINGTON 10/05/2000 21675.00000 38-53-37.4 N CA NE 122-01-02.9 W 0000234352 SACRAMENTO-VALLEY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP ORD BEND 10/05/2000 06700.62500 39-36-31.6 N Page 24 CF - Common Carrier Fixed Point to Point Microwave State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City MN NE 093-16-38.4 W 0000234578 KATLINK LLC MINNEAPOLIS 10/06/2000 19440.00000 44-59-00.5 N MN NE 093-16-38.4 W 0000234578 KATLINK LLC MINNEAPOLIS 10/06/2000 19520.00000 44-59-00.5 N MN NE 093-16-38.4 W 0000234578 KATLINK LLC MINNEAPOLIS 10/06/2000 19600.00000 44-59-00.5 N MN NE 093-16-10.4 W 0000234579 KATLINK LLC MINNEAPOLIS 10/06/2000 17880.00000 44-59-07.7 N MN NE 093-16-53.2 W 0000234580 KATLINK LLC MINNEAPOLIS 10/06/2000 17960.00000 44-59-19.2 N MN NE 093-16-30.5 W 0000234581 KATLINK LLC MINNEAPOLIS 10/06/2000 18040.00000 49-59-23.7
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-206940A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-206940A1.txt
  • 119-31-45.2 W 0000244142 Qwest Corporation OMAK 10/23/2000 10875.00000 48-24-26.5 N WA MD WFY571 119-31-45.2 W 0000244142 Qwest Corporation OMAK 10/23/2000 10955.00000 48-24-26.5 N WA MD WFY571 119-31-45.2 W 0000244142 Qwest Corporation OMAK 10/23/2000 11035.00000 48-24-26.5 N WA MD WFY571 119-31-45.2 W 0000244142 Qwest Corporation OMAK 10/23/2000 18120.00000 48-24-26.5 N WA MD KPT53 119-50-39.2 W 0000244150 Qwest Corporation BREWSTER 10/23/2000 05974.85000 48-09-00.5 N WA MD KPT53 119-50-39.2 W 0000244150 Qwest Corporation BREWSTER 10/23/2000 06034.20000 48-09-00.5 N WA MD KPT53 119-50-39.2 W 0000244150 Qwest Corporation BREWSTER 10/23/2000 06093.45000 48-09-00.5 N WA MD KPT53 119-50-39.2 W 0000244150 Qwest Corporation BREWSTER 10/23/2000 06123.10000 48-09-00.5 N WA MD KPT53 119-50-39.2 W 0000244150 Qwest Corporation BREWSTER 10/23/2000 11365.00000 48-09-00.5 N WA MD KPT53 119-50-39.2 W 0000244150 Qwest
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-207245A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-207245A1.txt
  • 118-25-59.3 W 0000242438 LOS ANGELES SMSA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP PACOIMA 10/18/2000 10582.50000 34-15-30.0 N CA MD WLV932 118-25-59.3 W 0000242438 LOS ANGELES SMSA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP PACOIMA 10/18/2000 19137.50000 34-15-30.0 N CA MD WLU931 118-26-59.3 W 0000242439 LOS ANGELES SMSA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP VAN NUYS 10/18/2000 10552.50000 34-12-36.0 N CA MD WPNC318 118-28-07.5 W 0000242440 LOS ANGELES SMSA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP SEPULVEDA 10/18/2000 10577.50000 34-14-00.5 N CA MD WMW355 118-24-52.3 W 0000242451 LOS ANGELES SMSA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP ARLETA 10/18/2000 10572.50000 34-14-17.0 N CA MD WLV933 118-29-04.3 W 0000242494 LOS ANGELES SMSA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP VAN NUYS 10/18/2000 10638.75000 34-12-59.0 N CA MD WLV933 118-29-04.3 W 0000242494 LOS ANGELES SMSA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP VAN NUYS 10/18/2000 11215.00000 34-12-59.0 N CA MD WHC938 117-42-53.1 W 0000242506 LOS ANGELES SMSA
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-207434A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-207434A1.txt
  • 38-55-02.6 N CA AM WLW581 121-32-42.8 W 0000234347 SACRAMENTO VALLEY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP EAST NICOLAUS 11/07/2000 06063.80000 38-55-02.6 N CA AM WLW581 121-32-42.8 W 0000234347 SACRAMENTO VALLEY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP EAST NICOLAUS 11/07/2000 10558.12500 38-55-02.6 N CA AM WLW581 121-32-42.8 W 0000234347 SACRAMENTO VALLEY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP EAST NICOLAUS 11/07/2000 11385.00000 38-55-02.6 N MN AM 093-16-38.4 W 0000234578 KATLINK LLC MINNEAPOLIS 11/06/2000 19440.00000 44-59-00.5 N MN AM 093-16-38.4 W 0000234578 KATLINK LLC MINNEAPOLIS 11/06/2000 19520.00000 44-59-00.5 N MN AM 093-16-38.4 W 0000234578 KATLINK LLC MINNEAPOLIS 11/06/2000 19600.00000 44-59-00.5 N MN AM 093-16-38.4 W 0000234578 KATLINK LLC MINNEAPOLIS 11/06/2000 19680.00000 44-59-00.5 N Page 4 CF - Common Carrier Fixed Point to Point Microwave State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-207700A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-207700A1.txt
  • JUAN CELLULAR TELEPHONE COMPANY BAYAMON 11/13/2000 10955.00000 18-21-08.7 N WA AM 122-20-05.0 W 0000187981 BACKLINK LLC SEATTLE 11/13/2000 19680.00000 47-36-02.3 N DE AM 075-39-31.8 W 0000196793 BACKLINK LLC NEWARK 11/13/2000 21325.00000 39-41-11.5 N DE AM 075-39-31.8 W 0000196793 BACKLINK LLC NEWARK 11/13/2000 21475.00000 39-41-11.5 N DE AM 075-39-31.8 W 0000196793 BACKLINK LLC NEWARK 11/13/2000 21675.00000 39-41-11.5 N MA AM WHO996 071-13-00.5 W 0000204097 SOUTHWESTERN BELL MOBILE SYSTEMS, INC. ANDOVER 11/14/2000 10658.12500 42-39-14.0 N CA AM 117-09-53.4 W 0000211990 BACKLINK LLC SAN DIEGO 11/13/2000 21375.00000 32-50-01.2 N CA AM 117-09-53.4 W 0000211990 BACKLINK LLC SAN DIEGO 11/13/2000 21575.00000 32-50-01.2 N CO AM WPQP206 104-59-49.0 W 0000215559 BACKLINK LLC DENVER 11/15/2000 06286.19000 39-44-47.2 N CO AM WPQP206 104-59-49.0 W 0000215559 BACKLINK LLC DENVER
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-208209A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-208209A1.txt
  • Carrier Fixed Point to Point Microwave State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City TX MD WLS714 097-58-00.0 W 0000285858 AT&T Wireless Services of Florida, Inc. SEGUIN 12/07/2000 06226.89000 29-32-52.8 N TX MD WLS714 097-58-00.0 W 0000285858 AT&T Wireless Services of Florida, Inc. SEGUIN 12/07/2000 06375.14000 29-32-52.8 N AZ MD WLA770 112-01-00.5 W 0000286067 Verizon Wireless (VAW) LLC PHOENIX 12/07/2000 02165.20000 33-27-13.1 N AZ MD WLA770 112-01-00.5 W 0000286067 Verizon Wireless (VAW) LLC PHOENIX 12/07/2000 06197.24000 33-27-13.1 N AZ MD WLA770 112-01-00.5 W 0000286067 Verizon Wireless (VAW) LLC PHOENIX 12/07/2000 06286.19000 33-27-13.1 N AZ MD WLA770 112-01-00.5 W 0000286067 Verizon Wireless (VAW) LLC PHOENIX 12/07/2000 18000.00000 33-27-13.1 N AZ MD WLA770 112-01-00.5
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-208380A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-208380A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-208380A1.txt
  • 34% of the total circuits used; International Private Line Services accounted for 62%; and the remaining 4% of total circuits were used for Video and other data services (outside of traditional private line services). The ratio of IMTS to private line services has continued to decrease from 1.4 in 1996, to 1.2 in 1997, to 0.8 in 1998, and to 0.5 in 1999. By transmission type, undersea cables account for 57% of total activated circuits, an increase of 3% from 1998; terrestrial links account for 36%, a decrease of 2% from 1998; and satellites account for 7% of the total activated capacity, a decrease of 1% from 1998. The top 30 destinations among all international routes account for 94% of the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-208420A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-208420A1.txt
  • 05994.62000 38-01-11.7 N CA AM WMS713 120-35-08.7 W 0000200521 CALIFORNIA RSA NO 3 LIMITED PARTNERSHIP ANGELS CAMP 12/13/2000 06014.38000 38-01-11.7 N AL AM 085-44-41.0 W 0000231894 Farmers Cellular Telephone, Inc. Ft. Payne 12/11/2000 06286.19000 34-23-50.9 N AL AM 085-50-27.3 W 0000231898 Farmers Cellular Telephone, Inc. RAINSVILLE 12/11/2000 06034.15000 34-29-26.4 N MN AM 093-16-38.4 W 0000234578 KATLINK LLC MINNEAPOLIS 12/13/2000 19400.00000 44-59-00.5 N MN AM 093-16-38.4 W 0000234578 KATLINK LLC MINNEAPOLIS 12/13/2000 19440.00000 44-59-00.5 N MN AM 093-16-38.4 W 0000234578 KATLINK LLC MINNEAPOLIS 12/13/2000 19520.00000 44-59-00.5 N MN AM 093-16-38.4 W 0000234578 KATLINK LLC MINNEAPOLIS 12/13/2000 19560.00000 44-59-00.5 N MN AM 093-16-38.4 W 0000234578 KATLINK LLC MINNEAPOLIS 12/13/2000 19600.00000 44-59-00.5 N Page 3 CF - Common Carrier Fixed Point to Point Microwave
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-208701A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-208701A1.txt
  • ALTA 12/29/2000 10623.12500 18-25-49.6 N TX MD WPQP795 096-47-43.1 W 0000310104 BACKLINK LLC Dallas 12/29/2000 18000.00000 32-55-25.1 N TX MD WPQP795 096-47-43.1 W 0000310104 BACKLINK LLC Dallas 12/29/2000 18120.00000 32-55-25.1 N TX MD WPQP794 096-47-48.1 W 0000310105 BACKLINK LLC Dallas 12/29/2000 17920.00000 32-55-25.4 N TX MD WPQP794 096-47-48.1 W 0000310105 BACKLINK LLC Dallas 12/29/2000 18000.00000 32-55-25.4 N TX MD WPQP793 096-47-00.5 W 0000310106 BACKLINK LLC Dallas 12/29/2000 17920.00000 32-55-25.7 N TX MD WPQP793 096-47-00.5 W 0000310106 BACKLINK LLC Dallas 12/29/2000 17960.00000 32-55-25.7 N PR NE 067-09-00.6 W 0000306472 Centennial Puerto Rico License Corp. HORMIGUEROS 12/26/2000 11632.50000 18-08-20.8 N PR NE 067-08-44.0 W 0000306473 Centennial Puerto Rico License Corp. SAN MIGUEL 12/26/2000 11142.50000 18-10-57.0 N FL NE 080-08-35.8 W 0000307388 KATLINK LLC
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-208868A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-208868A1.txt
  • 46-56-37.0 N WA NE 119-57-08.3 W 0000311001 NEXTEL LICENSE HOLDINGS 4, INC. Vantage 01/02/2001 19575.00000 46-56-37.0 N TX NE 097-13-02.0 W 0000311008 Trinity River Authority of Texas ROANOKE 12/15/2000 00932.33125 33-01-25.4 N TX NE 097-13-02.0 W 0000311008 Trinity River Authority of Texas ROANOKE 12/15/2000 00941.33125 33-01-25.4 N TX NE 096-38-20.0 W 0000311010 Trinity River Authority of Texas FERRIS 12/15/2000 00932.36875 32-34-00.5 N TX NE 096-38-20.0 W 0000311010 Trinity River Authority of Texas FERRIS 12/15/2000 00941.36875 32-34-00.5 N WA NE 122-28-23.6 W 0000311135 St Joseph Hospital BELLINGHAM 12/18/2000 23425.00000 48-44-37.4 N WA NE 122-28-22.6 W 0000311173 St Joseph Hospital BELLINGHAM 12/18/2000 22225.00000 48-46-23.4 N FL NE 080-23-59.8 W 0000311194 METROPOLITIAN DADE, COUNTY Miami 01/02/2001 00932.30625 25-37-01.1 N FL NE 080-23-59.8 W 0000311194
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-209289A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-209289A1.txt
  • Infinity Broadcasting Corporation Hollywood 01/17/2001 00494.00000 - 00608.00000 34-07-00.0 N CA NE P 118-19-32.3 W 0000332016 Infinity Broadcasting Corporation Hollywood 01/17/2001 00614.00000 - 00806.00000 34-07-00.0 N MG - Microwave Industrial/Business Pool State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City TX AM WPOL907 097-05-53.0 W 0000217525 UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANYBellmead 01/16/2001 00943.86250 31-35-00.5 N TX AM WPOL907 097-05-53.0 W 0000217525 UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANYBellmead 01/16/2001 00943.86250 31-35-00.5 N AL AM WAK205 087-17-17.0 W 0000243089 ALABAMA POWER COMPANY FLOMATON 01/19/2001 06615.00000 31-00-41.0 N AL AM WAK205 087-17-17.0 W 0000243089 ALABAMA POWER COMPANY FLOMATON 01/19/2001 06635.00000 31-00-41.0 N OR AM 123-07-18.4 W 0000243129 AMERICAN TELECASTING OF PORTLAND, INC. salem 01/16/2001 06152.75000 44-51-17.4 N Page 112
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-209663A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-209663A1.txt
  • Status. Lat. 29 33 13 N. - Lon. 98 21 16 W. 12544 JUDSON ROAD, SAN ANTONIO, TX New Station Other Facilities Changes LEAD CALLSIGN: WFY852 File Number Applicant Channel(s) Station City & State BPMDH-20000818ACJ CS WIRELESS SYSTEMS, INC. 1 MAYSVILLE, MO Call Sign NEW (305155) Non-Common Carrier Status. Lat. 39 52 4 N. - Lon. 94 22 14 W. 0.5 MILES WEST OF MO HWY 33, MAYSVILLE, MO New Station Other Facilities Changes LEAD CALLSIGN: WMX936 File Number Applicant Channel(s) Station City & State BPMDH-20000818ACX CS WIRELESS SYSTEMS, INC. 1 EFFINGHAM, KS Call Sign NEW (305170) Non-Common Carrier Status. Lat. 39 30 2 N. - Lon. 95 29 38 W. 3 MILES SOUTH OF US 159, EFFINGHAM, KS New Station
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-209814A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-209814A1.txt
  • Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City CA NE 117-09-28.8 W 0000356748 BACKLINK LLC San Diego 02/02/2001 19400.00000 32-42-55.5 N CA NE 117-09-37.8 W 0000356754 BACKLINK LLC San Diego 02/02/2001 19360.00000 32-43-20.2 N CA NE 117-09-51.4 W 0000356755 BACKLINK LLC San Diego 02/02/2001 19440.00000 32-42-54.3 N CA NE 117-09-29.3 W 0000356756 BACKLINK LLC San Diego 02/02/2001 19320.00000 32-43-03.5 N CA NE 117-10-00.5 W 0000356757 BACKLINK LLC San Diego 02/02/2001 19400.00000 32-42-59.4 N CA NE 117-09-31.2 W 0000356758 BACKLINK LLC San Diego 02/02/2001 19600.00000 32-43-05.4 N CA NE 117-09-39.0 W 0000356759 BACKLINK LLC San Diego 02/02/2001 19560.00000 32-43-54.7 N CA NE 117-09-32.8 W 0000356760 BACKLINK LLC San Diego 02/02/2001 19440.00000 32-43-14.9 N GA NE 084-21-44.0 W 0000356781 Winstar Wireless Fiber Corp. Atlanta 02/02/2001
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-210072A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-210072A1.txt
  • 02/05/2001 06063.80000 34-49-24.4 N SC MD WPOV410 082-17-52.4 W 0000358145 Cellco Partnership, dba Verizon WirelessGREENVILLE 02/05/2001 06093.45000 34-49-24.4 N SC MD WPOV410 082-17-52.4 W 0000358145 Cellco Partnership, dba Verizon WirelessGREENVILLE 02/05/2001 06123.10000 34-49-24.4 N SC MD WPOV410 082-17-52.4 W 0000358145 Cellco Partnership, dba Verizon WirelessGREENVILLE 02/05/2001 06152.75000 34-49-24.4 N MN MD WPRT349 093-16-38.4 W 0000358167 KATLINK LLC MINNEAPOLIS 02/05/2001 19680.00000 44-59-00.5 N MN MD WPRS701 093-16-14.8 W 0000358168 KATLINK LLC Minneapolis 02/05/2001 18120.00000 44-58-44.6 N SC MD WAH514 082-00-35.3 W 0000358176 Cellco Partnership, dba Verizon WirelessMOORE 02/05/2001 06197.20000 34-50-42.4 N SC MD WAH514 082-00-35.3 W 0000358176 Cellco Partnership, dba Verizon WirelessMOORE 02/05/2001 06197.24000 34-50-42.4 N SC MD WAH514 082-00-35.3 W 0000358176 Cellco Partnership, dba Verizon WirelessMOORE 02/05/2001 06226.89000 34-50-42.4 N SC
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-210319A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-210319A1.txt
  • Licenses, LLC San Francisco 02/13/2001 00949.00000 37-46-36.7 N LA NE 092-06-32.3 W 0000367022 Citadel Broadcasting Company Monroe 02/13/2001 00945.50000 32-31-16.3 N GU NE 144-44-36.6 E 0000369331 Guam Radio Services, Inc. AGANA 02/16/2001 00947.00000 13-28-33.6 N LA NE 092-06-32.3 W 0000369396 Citadel Broadcasting Company Monroe 02/15/2001 00950.75000 32-31-16.3 N MN NE 095-58-09.0 W 0000370908 R & J Broadcasting Mahnomen 02/16/2001 00944.62500 47-19-00.5 N MN NE 095-58-09.0 W 0000370908 R & J Broadcasting Mahnomen 02/16/2001 00944.87500 47-19-00.5 N MT NE 111-02-23.0 W 0000370909 Marathon Media Group, L.L.C. Bozeman 02/16/2001 00945.00000 45-40-55.0 N Page 2 AS - Aural Studio Transmitter Link State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City MT NE 111-02-23.0 W 0000370925 Marathon
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-210541A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-210541A1.txt
  • 39-46-52.3 N CA AM 120-27-25.6 W 0000203359 Rock It Radio, LLC Lompoc 02/21/2001 00949.00000 34-38-19.9 N MD AM WLG299 078-55-55.9 W 0000279704 WFWM RADIO FROSTBURG STATE UNIVERSITY FROSTBURG 02/12/2001 00951.00000 39-39-08.1 N Page 1 AS - Aural Studio Transmitter Link State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City AZ MD WLP492 110-55-00.5 W 0000378228 GOOD MUSIC, INC. TUCSON 02/23/2001 00944.25000 32-11-12.7 N NC NE 075-39-59.5 W 0000372910 University of North Carolina at Chapel HillManeto 02/20/2001 00949.00000 35-54-38.0 N NJ NE 074-48-14.0 W 0000373190 WRNJ Radio, Inc. Washington Township 02/20/2001 00951.12500 40-50-43.0 N SC NE 080-06-12.3 W 0000375150 Daniels, Thomas B North Charleston 02/21/2001 00951.37500 32-55-42.6 N NJ NE 075-02-14.0 W 0000375255 QUINN
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-211250A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-211250A1.txt
  • JAL 03/12/2001 00941.28125 32-17-03.0 N NM AM 103-30-33.0 W 0000384194 CONOCO COMMUNICATIONS INC JAL 03/12/2001 00941.33125 32-17-03.0 N CA MD WPOM765 116-59-49.0 W 0000334840 Caritas Telecommunications Beaumont 01/19/2001 05974.85000 33-54-29.0 N CA MD WPOM765 116-59-49.0 W 0000334840 Caritas Telecommunications Beaumont 01/19/2001 05974.85000 33-54-29.0 N PA MD WPOS259 075-10-30.4 W 0000393117 Comcast Cablevision of Philadelphia Area I, Inc. PHILADELPHIA 02/28/2001 18145.00000 39-57-00.5 N MS MD WNTR635 090-11-02.0 W 0000393222 STATE OF MISSISSIPPI DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION JASKSON 02/27/2001 00928.23125 32-19-54.0 N MS MD WNTR635 090-11-02.0 W 0000393222 STATE OF MISSISSIPPI DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION JASKSON 02/27/2001 00928.23125 32-19-54.0 N MS MD WNTR635 090-11-02.0 W 0000393222 STATE OF MISSISSIPPI DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION JASKSON 02/27/2001 00952.23125 32-19-54.0 N MS MD WNTR635 090-11-02.0 W 0000393222 STATE OF
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-211420A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-211420A1.txt
  • City FL NE 085-43-35.7 W 0000403736 Bay County School Board Panama City 03/22/2001 06545.00000 30-11-06.7 N AZ NE 112-34-44.1 W 0000404028 PHOENIX, CITY OF LITCHFIELD PARK 03/22/2001 00928.10625 33-34-31.1 N AZ NE 112-34-44.1 W 0000404028 PHOENIX, CITY OF LITCHFIELD PARK 03/22/2001 00952.10625 33-34-31.1 N VT NE P 072-40-22.0 W 0000404104 RICHFORD WATER DEPARTMENT RICHFORD 03/12/2001 00956.31875 44-54-25.0 N GM NE 091-21-00.5 W 0000404116 COASTAL PRODUCT SERVICE OFF SHORE 03/19/2001 00941.58750 28-17-00.8 N GM NE 091-30-05.0 W 0000404122 COASTAL PRODUCT SERVICE OFF SHORE 03/19/2001 00941.63750 28-41-17.0 N GM NE 091-18-32.8 W 0000404135 COASTAL PRODUCT SERVICE OFF SHORE 03/19/2001 00932.58750 28-13-58.4 N GM NE 091-30-05.0 W 0000404169 COASTAL PRODUCT SERVICE OFF SHORE 03/19/2001 00932.63750 28-42-09.1 N GM NE 092-21-53.5 W 0000404222 COASTAL PRODUCT
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-211805A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-211805A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-211805A1.txt
  • in the sample to any other. To document the signal conditions under which the comparison tests were conducted, the added noise was then set at 1 dB below the TOU point for the data collection receiver, and threshold measurements and tap energy data were recorded from the data collection receiver. If the input signal exhibited a range of variability exceeding 0.5 dB, the range was rounded off to the nearest dB and the noise attenuator was adjusted to the appropriate setting to keep the S/N ratio just above threshold for the data collection receiver during signal variations. If signal level variability was present, the TOV and TOU levels for each receiver were checked several times in order to establish confidence in
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-212302A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-212302A1.txt
  • 080-05-36.0 W 0000407925 Stratophone, LLC WEXFORD 03/27/2001 00454.80000 40-37-11.0 N PA MD KGC406 080-05-36.0 W 0000407925 Stratophone, LLC WEXFORD 03/27/2001 00454.87500 40-37-11.0 N CL - Cellular State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City MI AM KNKA231 083-17-08.1 W 0000302739 Detroit SMSA Limited Partnership Redford 03/26/2001 42-23-59.9 N WA MD KNKA280 121-30-00.5 W 0000406340 SEATTLE SMSA LIMITED PARTNERSHIPCrystal Mountain 03/26/2001 46-56-16.9 N WA MD KNKA280 121-30-00.5 W 0000406340 SEATTLE SMSA LIMITED PARTNERSHIPCrystal Mountain 03/26/2001 46-56-16.9 N CA MD KNKN267 123-54-20.3 W 0000406774 CALIFORNIA RURAL SERVICE AREA #1, INC. KLAMATH GLEN 03/26/2001 41-31-27.4 N Page 29 CL - Cellular State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-212477A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-212477A1.txt
  • State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City OK MD WPRV693 097-56-56.0 W 0000437235 Western Farmers Electric Cooperative COMANCHE 04/24/2001 00932.31875 34-20-46.0 N OK MD WPRV693 097-56-56.0 W 0000437235 Western Farmers Electric Cooperative COMANCHE 04/24/2001 00941.31875 34-20-46.0 N LA MD WPNA262 093-45-36.6 W 0000437339 SOUTHWESTERN ELECTRIC POWER COMPANY SHREVEPORT 04/24/2001 06093.45000 32-31-00.5 N LA MD WPNA262 093-45-36.6 W 0000437339 SOUTHWESTERN ELECTRIC POWER COMPANY SHREVEPORT 04/24/2001 06826.25000 32-31-00.5 N TX MD KLD24 099-43-46.3 W 0000437384 West Texas Utilities ABILENE 04/24/2001 06093.45000 32-27-08.4 N OK MD WNTR373 094-52-46.9 W 0000437720 Vastar Resources Inc. RED OAK 04/24/2001 00928.18125 35-04-35.7 N OK MD WNTR373 094-52-46.9 W 0000437720 Vastar Resources Inc. RED OAK 04/24/2001 00952.18125 35-04-35.7 N
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-212664A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-212664A1.txt
  • Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City FL NE 081-00-30.4 W 0000448559 Aeronautical Radio Inc. MARATHON 04/16/2001 00136.62500 24-43-34.5 N FL NE 080-17-24.2 W 0000448583 Aeronautical Radio Inc. MIAMI 04/16/2001 00136.62500 25-47-36.4 N OH NE 084-13-28.8 W 0000448599 Aeronautical Radio Inc. MIAMISBURG 04/16/2001 00128.97500 39-35-20.2 N AL NE 086-23-35.9 W 0000448605 Aeronautical Radio Inc. MONTGOMERY 04/16/2001 00129.95000 32-18-00.5 N IL NE 089-40-39.4 W 0000448615 Aeronautical Radio Inc. SPRINGFIELD 05/03/2001 00128.95000 39-50-38.2 N NY NE 073-46-40.5 W 0000448617 Aeronautical Radio Inc. NEW YORK 04/16/2001 00136.65000 40-38-25.4 N MD NE 076-40-05.5 W 0000448641 Aeronautical Radio Inc. BALTIMORE 05/03/2001 00131.32500 39-10-31.4 N AZ NE 112-04-59.5 W 0000448643 Aeronautical Radio Inc. PHOENIX 04/16/2001 00131.55000 33-41-13.1 N PA NE 080-13-56.2 W 0000448648 Aeronautical
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-212765A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-212765A1.txt
  • objections may be filed no later than 10 days after the original objection is filed. Responses to the opposition may be filed no later than 5 days after the time for filing an opposition has expired. A Apppplliiccaanntt FFiillee N Nuum mbbeerr C Coooorrddiinnaatteess D Daattee R Reecc''dd Intrepid Land Use Service, Inc. A0189882 29-42-15.2/81-40-8.9 5/04/01 Crown Communication Inc. A0190290 39-38-0.5/94-36-33.3 5/05/01 SBA Towers Inc. A0190042 35-49-1.7/82-0-47 5/07/01 SBA Towers Inc. A0190132 43-4-53.6/76-13-52.2 5/07/01 SBA Towers Inc. A0190246 36-11-44.8/75-52-39.6 5/08/01 -FCC-
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-213011A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-213011A1.txt
  • LIMITED PARTNERSHIP JAMAICA 05/18/2001 06117.54100 37-44-41.9 N VA MD WPJB378 076-43-44.4 W 0000465665 WASHINGTON BALTIMORE CELLULAR LIMITED PARTNERSHIP JAMAICA 05/18/2001 06149.04400 37-44-41.9 N VA MD WMR467 076-59-42.0 W 0000465671 WASHINGTON BALTIMORE CELLULAR LIMITED PARTNERSHIP OAK GROVE 05/18/2001 02124.80000 38-09-00.9 N VA MD WMR467 076-59-42.0 W 0000465671 WASHINGTON BALTIMORE CELLULAR LIMITED PARTNERSHIP OAK GROVE 05/18/2001 02128.00000 38-09-00.9 N VA MD WPJB379 076-23-00.5 W 0000465683 WASHINGTON BALTIMORE CELLULAR LIMITED PARTNERSHIP KILMARNOCK 05/18/2001 06369.58100 37-44-21.3 N VA MD WPJB376 077-03-29.4 W 0000465695 WASHINGTON BALTIMORE CELLULAR LIMITED PARTNERSHIP ST STEPHENS CHURCH 05/18/2001 06108.89300 37-47-45.4 N CA MD WPOS872 124-05-05.2 W 0000465733 Cal-One Cellular L.P. ORICK 05/18/2001 06063.80000 41-16-43.4 N NM MD WFY807 108-56-01.2 W 0000465811 WESTERN NEW MEXICO TELEPHONE COMPANY, INC. GLENWOOD 05/18/2001 02171.60000 33-18-15.2
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-213235A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-213235A1.txt
  • BLAIRSVILLE 05/25/2001 00928.06875 34-58-56.3 N GA AM 084-00-14.6 W 0000422444 BLUE RIDGE MOUNTAIN ELECTRICAL MEMBERSHIP CORPORATION BLAIRSVILLE 05/25/2001 00952.06875 34-58-56.3 N WY AM 105-52-48.3 W 0000425325 CLEARWAVE SYSTEMS INC GILLETTE 05/21/2001 06226.89000 43-43-30.9 N WY AM 105-52-48.3 W 0000425325 CLEARWAVE SYSTEMS INC GILLETTE 05/21/2001 06404.79000 43-43-30.9 N LA AM WPNA262 093-45-36.6 W 0000437339 SOUTHWESTERN ELECTRIC POWER COMPANY SHREVEPORT 05/21/2001 06093.45000 32-31-00.5 N LA AM WPNA262 093-45-36.6 W 0000437339 SOUTHWESTERN ELECTRIC POWER COMPANY SHREVEPORT 05/21/2001 06825.00000 32-31-00.5 N KY AM WCP802 082-31-42.5 W 0000439195 Kentucky Power Company dba American Electric Power DORTON 05/21/2001 06765.00000 37-17-10.3 N KY AM 083-07-01.6 W 0000439842 Kentucky Power Company dba AEP Jeff 05/21/2001 06605.00000 37-12-05.3 N AZ MD WNEO857 111-45-07.4 W 0000467938 Salt River Project Agricultural Improvement
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-214023A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-214023A1.txt
  • uuppoonn tthhee eennvviirroonnm meenntt.. SSeeee 4477 C C..FF.. R R.. §§ 11..11330088((dd)).. A Accccoorrddiinnggllyy,, tthhee aapppplliiccaattiioonn((ss)) lliisstteedd hheerreeiinn ffoorr m maajjoorr eennvviirroonnm meennttaall aaccttiioonnss aarree G GR RA AN NTTEED D.. A Apppplliiccaanntt FFiillee N Nuum mbbeerr C Coooorrddiinnaatteess D Daattee R Reecc''dd TeleCorp Communications, Inc. A0185534 30-32-11.9/91-4-58.3 4/13/01 American Tower Limited Partnership A0186254 38-56-27.3/82-6-43.8 4/18/01 Crown Communication Inc. A0190290 39-38-0.5/94-36-33.3 5/05/01 SBA Towers Inc. A0190042 35-49-1.7/82-0-47.3 5/07/01 SBA Towers Inc. A0190131 43-4-53.6/76-13-52.2 5/07/01 SBA Towers Inc. A0190246 36-11-44.8/75-52-39.6 5/08/01 -FCC-
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-214106A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-214106A1.txt
  • - Common Carrier Fixed Point to Point Microwave State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City NC MD WPJF580 078-40-16.0 W 0000503706 NORTH CAROLINA RSA #9, INC. ELIZABETHTOWN 06/27/2001 02162.00000 34-37-29.0 N NC MD WPJF580 078-40-16.0 W 0000503706 NORTH CAROLINA RSA #9, INC. ELIZABETHTOWN 06/27/2001 06745.00000 34-37-29.0 N AZ MD WLA770 112-01-00.5 W 0000504471 Verizon Wireless (VAW) LLC PHOENIX 06/28/2001 02165.20000 33-27-13.1 N AZ MD WLA770 112-01-00.5 W 0000504471 Verizon Wireless (VAW) LLC PHOENIX 06/28/2001 06197.24000 33-27-13.1 N AZ MD WLA770 112-01-00.5 W 0000504471 Verizon Wireless (VAW) LLC PHOENIX 06/28/2001 06286.19000 33-27-13.1 N AZ MD WLA770 112-01-00.5 W 0000504471 Verizon Wireless (VAW) LLC PHOENIX 06/28/2001 17800.00000 33-27-13.1 N AZ MD WLA770 112-01-00.5
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-214594A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-214594A1.txt
  • 07/10/2001 00467.17500 AM A 0000402818 HARMER COMMUNICATIONS INC 07/10/2001 00469.40000 HI AM 156-23-43.9 W 0000402818 HARMER COMMUNICATIONS INC KULA 07/10/2001 00462.17500 20-41-20.5 N HI AM 156-23-43.9 W 0000402818 HARMER COMMUNICATIONS INC KULA 07/10/2001 00464.40000 20-41-20.5 N HI AM 156-51-50.9 W 0000402818 HARMER COMMUNICATIONS INC LANAI 07/10/2001 00461.40000 20-48-11.6 N HI AM 156-21-43.9 W 0000402818 HARMER COMMUNICATIONS INC ULUPALAKUA 07/10/2001 00461.15000 20-39-00.5 N Page 123 YK - Industrial/Business Pool - Commercial, Trunked State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City NJ AM P 074-41-16.0 W 0000472932 i2WAY CORPORATION COLESVILLE 07/12/2001 00451.23750 41-21-10.0 N NJ AM P 074-41-16.0 W 0000472932 i2WAY CORPORATION COLESVILLE 07/12/2001 00451.28750 41-21-10.0 N NJ AM P 074-41-16.0 W 0000472932 i2WAY
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-214800A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-214800A1.txt
  • N Page 8 CF - Common Carrier Fixed Point to Point Microwave State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City PR MD WMJ836 066-44-53.0 W 0000526964 CCPR SERVICES INC PENUELAS 07/17/2001 06375.14000 18-04-43.0 N PR MD WMJ836 066-44-53.0 W 0000526964 CCPR SERVICES INC PENUELAS 07/17/2001 10618.75000 18-04-43.0 N PR MD WPSL955 066-04-00.5 W 0000527023 SprintCom, Inc. RIO PIEDRAS 07/17/2001 18070.00000 18-22-09.5 N PR MD WPSL955 066-04-00.5 W 0000527023 SprintCom, Inc. RIO PIEDRAS 07/17/2001 18070.00000 18-22-09.5 N PR MD WPSL956 066-05-50.2 W 0000527036 SprintCom, Inc. GUAYNABO 07/17/2001 19630.00000 18-20-21.0 N PR MD WPSL956 066-05-50.2 W 0000527036 SprintCom, Inc. GUAYNABO 07/17/2001 19665.00000 18-20-21.0 N PA MD WLN882 078-50-23.7 W 0000527214 Cellco Partnership dba Verizon
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-215526A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-215526A1.txt
  • 15.6 14.6 15.9 6.2 8.0 1982 10.8 9.0 2.7 3.9 4.2 1.7 1983 3.1 0.2 1.4 0.0 7.4 3.9 1984 17.2 10.4 -4.3 -5.1 3.6 3.8 1985 8.9 12.4 -3.7 -3.0 0.6 2.1 1986 7.1 8.9 -9.4 -10.0 0.3 -3.5 1987 3.3 2.6 -12.4 -11.8 -3.0 -3.0 1988 4.5 4.6 -4.2 -2.1 -4.2 -3.8 1989 0.6 1.9 -1.3 -1.7 -2.6 0.5 1990 1.0 1.5 -3.7 -0.1 -2.2 -2.2 1991 5.1 2.1 1.3 -1.3 -1.5 -2.6 1992 0.5 -0.2 -1.3 1.0 -2.4 1.3 1993 1.0 0.8 6.5 3.8 0.2 -1.1 1994 -0.3 0.7 5.4 6.1 -1.0 -1.4 1995 2.6 2/ 0.1 2/ -3.8 2/ 1996 0.9 0.2 3.7 2.5 6.1 0.5 1997 1.0 0.2 -4.3 3.6 2.8 -4.0 1998 1.3 -0.1 -0.8
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-215731A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-215731A1.txt
  • CARRIZALES 08/24/2001 18070.00000 18-28-38.5 N PR AM 067-08-59.1 W 0000517368 SprintCom, Inc. MAYAGUEZ 08/24/2001 19585.00000 18-11-00.2 N Page 13 CF - Common Carrier Fixed Point to Point Microwave State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City PR AM 067-08-53.5 W 0000522642 SprintCom, Inc. AGUADA 08/24/2001 17945.00000 18-19-20.7 N PR AM WPSL955 066-04-00.5 W 0000527023 SprintCom, Inc. RIO PIEDRAS 08/24/2001 18070.00000 18-22-09.5 N PR AM WPSL955 066-04-00.5 W 0000527023 SprintCom, Inc. RIO PIEDRAS 08/24/2001 18070.00000 18-22-09.5 N PR AM WPSL956 066-05-50.2 W 0000527036 SprintCom, Inc. GUAYNABO 08/24/2001 19630.00000 18-20-21.0 N PR AM WPSL956 066-05-50.2 W 0000527036 SprintCom, Inc. GUAYNABO 08/24/2001 19665.00000 18-20-21.0 N IA AM 091-32-15.5 W 0000553011 Iowa RSA No. 12 Limited
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-216205A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-216205A1.txt
  • Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City NC RM KNKN626 084-01-55.7 W 0000589741 CELLCO PARTNERSHIP MURPHY 09/12/2001 35-07-19.3 N NC RM KNKN626 083-47-42.6 W 0000589741 CELLCO PARTNERSHIP ROBBINSVILLE 09/12/2001 35-15-27.3 N SC RM KNKN780 080-57-58.3 W 0000589856 CELLCO PARTNERSHIP FORT MILL 09/12/2001 35-01-07.5 N SC RM KNKN780 080-43-55.2 W 0000589856 CELLCO PARTNERSHIP Lancaster 09/12/2001 34-41-00.5 N SC RM KNKN780 081-14-01.3 W 0000589856 CELLCO PARTNERSHIP York 09/12/2001 34-57-53.5 N AL RM KNKN936 085-53-08.8 W 0000589877 Cellco Partnership dba Verizon WirelessCollinsville 09/12/2001 34-21-22.3 N AL RM KNKN936 085-39-46.6 W 0000589877 Cellco Partnership dba Verizon WirelessFORT PAYNE 09/12/2001 34-28-48.6 N AL RM KNKN936 085-39-46.6 W 0000589877 Cellco Partnership dba Verizon WirelessFORT PAYNE 09/12/2001 34-28-48.6 N AL RM KNKN936
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-216388A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-216388A1.txt
  • and Santa Fe Railway Co Merna 09/19/2001 02146.00000 41-28-05.0 N NE MD WGY659 099-54-57.4 W 0000595930 The Burlington Northern and Santa Fe Railway Co Merna 09/19/2001 06226.89000 41-28-05.0 N NE MD WGY659 099-54-57.4 W 0000595930 The Burlington Northern and Santa Fe Railway Co Merna 09/19/2001 06315.84000 41-28-05.0 N GA MD WNTB707 083-35-50.7 W 0000596516 GEORGIA POWER COMPANY Bonaire 09/19/2001 00928.41875 32-34-00.5 N GA MD WNTB707 083-35-50.7 W 0000596516 GEORGIA POWER COMPANY Bonaire 09/19/2001 00932.43125 32-34-00.5 N GA MD WNTB707 083-35-50.7 W 0000596516 GEORGIA POWER COMPANY Bonaire 09/19/2001 00941.43125 32-34-00.5 N GA MD WNTB707 083-35-50.7 W 0000596516 GEORGIA POWER COMPANY Bonaire 09/19/2001 00952.41875 32-34-00.5 N GA MD WNEH499 082-09-59.0 W 0000597069 JEFFERSON ENERGY COOPERATIVEBLYTHE 09/19/2001 02185.60000 33-18-55.0 N GA MD WNEH500 082-26-49.4
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-217280A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-217280A1.txt
  • 123-13-58.3 W 0000635632 Edge Wireless Licenses, LLC Ukiah 10/22/2001 17840.00000 39-07-00.0 N CA NE 123-13-58.3 W 0000635632 Edge Wireless Licenses, LLC Ukiah 10/22/2001 17920.00000 39-07-00.0 N PA NE 075-09-56.9 W 0000635888 BACKLINK LLC Philadelphia 10/22/2001 19520.00000 39-56-55.2 N PA NE 075-10-17.4 W 0000635889 BACKLINK LLC Philadelphia 10/22/2001 19680.00000 39-57-01.7 N PA NE 075-08-52.5 W 0000635890 BACKLINK LLC Philadelphia 10/22/2001 19360.00000 39-57-00.5 N Page 25 CF - Common Carrier Fixed Point to Point Microwave State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City PA NE 075-08-56.1 W 0000635891 BACKLINK LLC Philadelphia 10/22/2001 19440.00000 39-56-56.8 N PA NE 075-09-05.6 W 0000635892 BACKLINK LLC Philadelphia 10/22/2001 19400.00000 39-56-58.4 N PA NE 075-09-42.5 W 0000635893 BACKLINK LLC
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-217478A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-217478A1.txt
  • 0000595327 The Burlington Northern and Santa Fe Railway Co Hazard 10/30/2001 06775.00000 41-01-55.0 N WA AM 122-24-43.8 W 0000595555 Tacoma, City of Department of Public Utilities Tacoma 10/31/2001 00942.17500 47-18-15.6 N WA AM 122-24-43.8 W 0000595555 Tacoma, City of Department of Public Utilities Tacoma 10/30/2001 00942.17500 47-18-15.6 N GA AM WNTB707 083-35-50.7 W 0000596516 GEORGIA POWER COMPANY Bonaire 10/29/2001 00928.41875 32-34-00.5 N GA AM WNTB707 083-35-50.7 W 0000596516 GEORGIA POWER COMPANY Bonaire 10/29/2001 00932.43125 32-34-00.5 N GA AM WNTB707 083-35-50.7 W 0000596516 GEORGIA POWER COMPANY Bonaire 10/29/2001 00941.43125 32-34-00.5 N GA AM WNTB707 083-35-50.7 W 0000596516 GEORGIA POWER COMPANY Bonaire 10/29/2001 00952.41875 32-34-00.5 N WY AM 110-30-16.0 W 0000607819 Williams Energy Group Field Services aka Williams Energy Services KEMERRER 11/02/2001 06873.75000
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-219227A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-219227A1.txt
  • Radio Systems, Inc. MACCLENNY 01/11/2002 06760.00000 30-18-26.0 N FL NE 082-07-48.0 W 0000731196 M/A Com Private Radio Systems, Inc. MACCLENNY 01/11/2002 06850.00000 30-18-26.0 N FL NE 083-09-02.0 W 0000731197 M/A Com Private Radio Systems, Inc. CROSS CITY 01/11/2002 06780.00000 29-38-28.5 N FL NE 083-09-02.0 W 0000731197 M/A Com Private Radio Systems, Inc. CROSS CITY 01/11/2002 06800.00000 29-38-28.5 N FL NE 082-45-00.5 W 0000731198 M/A Com Private Radio Systems, Inc. Fort White 01/11/2002 05974.85000 29-58-42.6 N FL NE 082-45-00.5 W 0000731198 M/A Com Private Radio Systems, Inc. Fort White 01/11/2002 06093.45000 29-58-42.6 N FL NE 082-45-00.5 W 0000731198 M/A Com Private Radio Systems, Inc. Fort White 01/11/2002 06610.00000 29-58-42.6 N ND NE 100-55-23.0 W 0000731274 Touch America Mandan 01/11/2002 21375.00000 46-51-16.0 N
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-220113A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-220113A1.txt
  • 0000773153 CITY OF ELKO ELKO 02/08/2002 00121.50000 40-49-35.0 N NV NE 115-46-50.0 W 0000773153 CITY OF ELKO ELKO 02/08/2002 00121.75000 40-49-35.0 N NV NE 115-46-50.0 W 0000773153 CITY OF ELKO ELKO 02/08/2002 00122.70000 40-49-35.0 N NV NE 115-46-50.0 W 0000773153 CITY OF ELKO ELKO 02/08/2002 00126.50000 40-49-35.0 N VA RM KJY6 077-18-58.9 W 0000768906 AERO INDUSTRIES INC SANDSTON 02/04/2002 00122.95000 37-30-00.5 N MO RM WGQ8 094-18-23.8 W 0000773398 CLAY, COUNTY OF MOSBY 02/15/2002 00122.70000 39-19-41.0 N RO KYH4 0000756385 OMAHA AIRPORT AUTHORITY 01/24/2002 RO WLA9 0000769692 AVIATION WORKS INC 02/07/2002 RO KBL2 0000772163 AERONAUTICAL RADIO INC 02/14/2002 RO KBZ4 0000772164 AERONAUTICAL RADIO INC 02/14/2002 RO KCY7 0000772165 AERONAUTICAL RADIO INC 02/14/2002 RO KFX8 0000772166 AERONAUTICAL RADIO INC 02/14/2002 Page 2 AF
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-220305A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-220305A1.txt
  • 081-22-45.0 W 0000775340 NEXTEL WIP LICENSE CORP SPRINGVILLE 02/19/2002 00852.03750 37-10-50.0 N VA MD WPSY210 081-22-45.0 W 0000775340 NEXTEL WIP LICENSE CORP SPRINGVILLE 02/19/2002 00852.98750 37-10-50.0 N VA MD WPSY210 081-22-45.0 W 0000775340 NEXTEL WIP LICENSE CORP SPRINGVILLE 02/19/2002 00854.23750 37-10-50.0 N VA MD WPSY210 081-22-45.0 W 0000775340 NEXTEL WIP LICENSE CORP SPRINGVILLE 02/19/2002 00854.63750 37-10-50.0 N VA MD WPSY215 080-43-00.5 W 0000775341 NEXTEL WIP LICENSE CORP DRAPER 02/19/2002 00852.83750 37-04-29.1 N VA MD WPSY215 080-43-00.5 W 0000775341 NEXTEL WIP LICENSE CORP DRAPER 02/19/2002 00854.46250 37-04-29.1 N VA MD WPSY215 080-51-21.0 W 0000775341 NEXTEL WIP LICENSE CORP NARROWS 02/19/2002 00852.83750 37-14-49.0 N VA MD WPSY215 080-51-21.0 W 0000775341 NEXTEL WIP LICENSE CORP NARROWS 02/19/2002 00854.46250 37-14-49.0 N WV MD WPTC313 081-06-54.0
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-220546A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-220546A1.txt
  • International, Inc. MEEKER 03/01/2002 06635.00000 39-55-24.0 N CO MD WPRU863 108-35-36.0 W 0000792009 Shell Services International, Inc. MEEKER 03/01/2002 06795.00000 39-52-54.0 N TX NE 099-25-01.0 W 0000784023 HOUSTON EXPLORATION COMPANYSan Ygnacio 02/25/2002 00928.63125 27-05-56.0 N TX NE 099-25-01.0 W 0000784023 HOUSTON EXPLORATION COMPANYSan Ygnacio 02/25/2002 00952.63125 27-05-56.0 N TX NE 098-07-09.2 W 0000784097 Brazos Electric Power Cooperative, Inc.Progress 02/25/2002 06855.00000 32-42-00.5 N GM NE 094-24-00.0 W 0000786451 Sola Communications Inc. Offshore 02/26/2002 00934.96250 29-11-00.0 N NJ NE 073-58-16.0 W 0000786749 Metro Networks Communications, Inc. Fort Lee 02/26/2002 21825.00000 40-50-44.0 N IN NE 087-25-21.1 W 0000788259 PSI Energy, Inc. West Terre Haute 02/27/2002 00928.19375 39-31-47.9 N IN NE 087-25-21.1 W 0000788259 PSI Energy, Inc. West Terre Haute 02/27/2002 00952.19375 39-31-47.9 N IN
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-220784A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-220784A1.txt
  • AM KFE34 072-27-17.3 W 0000759518 VERMONT, STATE OF ASCUTNEY 03/07/2002 06665.62500 43-26-36.3 N MD AM WNEW512 076-39-44.8 W 0000769472 State of Maryland MIEMSS BALTIMORE 03/04/2002 06665.00000 39-21-09.3 N MD AM WNEW512 076-39-44.8 W 0000769472 State of Maryland MIEMSS BALTIMORE 03/04/2002 11265.00000 39-21-09.3 N AZ MD KOA83 112-06-12.5 W 0000793445 ARIZONA, STATE OF PHOENIX 03/04/2002 10755.00000 33-28-21.1 N AZ MD KOK44 112-04-00.5 W 0000793677 ARIZONA, STATE OF PHOENIX 03/04/2002 11245.00000 33-19-57.1 N TX MD WNTE718 097-50-24.1 W 0000793833 AUSTIN, CITY OF AUSTIN 03/04/2002 01885.00000 30-11-40.8 N TX MD WNTE718 097-50-24.1 W 0000793833 AUSTIN, CITY OF AUSTIN 03/04/2002 01895.00000 30-11-40.8 N TX MD WNTE718 097-50-24.1 W 0000793833 AUSTIN, CITY OF AUSTIN 03/04/2002 06034.15000 30-11-40.8 N TX MD WNTE718 097-50-24.1 W 0000793833 AUSTIN, CITY
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-221304A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-221304A1.txt
  • 0000827588 M/A COM PRIVATE RADIO SYSTEMS, INC. CRESTVIEW 03/28/2002 06004.50000 30-43-51.0 N FL NE 086-21-53.0 W 0000827588 M/A COM PRIVATE RADIO SYSTEMS, INC. CRESTVIEW 03/28/2002 06063.80000 30-43-51.0 N FL NE 086-21-53.0 W 0000827588 M/A COM PRIVATE RADIO SYSTEMS, INC. CRESTVIEW 03/28/2002 06610.00000 30-43-51.0 N NJ NE 074-02-05.5 W 0000827766 Telemark Networks, Inc. JERSEY CITY 03/28/2002 17840.00000 40-43-01.3 N NJ NE 074-02-00.5 W 0000827775 Telemark Networks, Inc. JERSEY CITY 03/28/2002 18120.00000 40-43-34.3 N NJ NE 074-02-00.5 W 0000827775 Telemark Networks, Inc. JERSEY CITY 03/28/2002 19440.00000 40-43-34.3 N FL NE 085-25-28.0 W 0000827783 M/A COM PRIVATE RADIO SYSTEMS, INC. CALLAWAY 03/28/2002 06690.00000 30-08-34.0 N NY NE 074-00-46.0 W 0000827791 Telemark Networks, Inc. NEW YORK 03/28/2002 19360.00000 40-42-23.0 N NY NE 074-00-46.0 W 0000827791
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-221477A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-221477A1.txt
  • Mount Vernon 04/03/2002 37-56-41.3 N GS - Private Carrier Paging, 929-930 MHz State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City NY MD WNLI646 073-24-58.4 W 0000831887 METROCALL USA INC HUNTINGTON 04/01/2002 00929.36250 40-52-45.4 N NY MD WNLI646 074-00-17.5 W 0000831887 METROCALL USA INC MANHATTAN 04/01/2002 00929.36250 40-42-38.4 N NY MD WNLI646 074-00-00.5 W 0000831887 METROCALL USA INC MANHATTAN 04/01/2002 00929.36250 40-44-12.4 N NJ MD WNLI646 074-04-50.0 W 0000831887 METROCALL USA INC TINTON FALLS 04/01/2002 00929.36250 40-16-41.0 N NY MD WNLI646 073-53-09.5 W 0000831887 METROCALL USA INC YONKERS 04/01/2002 00929.36250 40-58-07.4 N NY MD WNWB486 072-20-54.0 W 0000831888 METROCALL USA INC NOYACK 04/01/2002 00929.36250 40-58-19.0 N IN NE 086-09-30.0 W 0000833933 MAZDA, SHERENAZ
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-221659A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-221659A1.txt
  • COLUMBIA 04/10/2002 00928.41875 31-15-35.0 N MS MD WPQR200 089-43-29.0 W 0000843488 Mississippi Power Company COLUMBIA 04/10/2002 00952.41875 31-15-35.0 N MS MD WPOP779 088-41-31.0 W 0000843507 MISSISSIPPI POWER COMPANY MERIDIAN 04/10/2002 00928.15625 32-19-37.0 N MS MD WPOP779 088-41-31.0 W 0000843507 MISSISSIPPI POWER COMPANY MERIDIAN 04/10/2002 00952.15625 32-19-37.0 N MS MD WPOP364 088-49-02.8 W 0000843517 MISSISSIPPI POWER COMPANY OCEAN SPRINGS 04/10/2002 00928.69375 30-27-00.5 N MS MD WPOP364 088-49-02.8 W 0000843517 MISSISSIPPI POWER COMPANY OCEAN SPRINGS 04/10/2002 00952.69375 30-27-00.5 N MT MD WNTM239 110-14-12.7 W 0000845613 MONTANA POWER COMPANY BIG SANDY 04/11/2002 06620.00000 48-07-16.9 N MT MD KOV73 112-00-32.0 W 0000845623 MONTANA POWER COMPANY CASCADE 04/11/2002 01855.00000 47-17-22.8 N MT MD KOV73 112-00-32.0 W 0000845623 MONTANA POWER COMPANY CASCADE 04/11/2002 01915.00000 47-17-22.8 N Page
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-221660A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-221660A1.txt
  • PAAUILO 04/08/2002 00851.78750 19-53-35.0 N HI MD KNNG859 155-23-04.0 W 0000840937 MOBILE TELEPHONE & PAGING INC. PAAUILO 04/08/2002 00852.03750 19-53-35.0 N Page 4 YX - SMR, 806-821/851-866 MHz, Trunked State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City HI MD WPFF711 156-21-42.9 W 0000840941 MOBILE TELEPHONE & PAGING INC. KEONEHUNEHUNE 04/08/2002 00851.21250 20-39-00.5 N HI MD WPFF711 156-21-42.9 W 0000840941 MOBILE TELEPHONE & PAGING INC. KEONEHUNEHUNE 04/08/2002 00851.46250 20-39-00.5 N HI MD WPFF711 156-21-42.9 W 0000840941 MOBILE TELEPHONE & PAGING INC. KEONEHUNEHUNE 04/08/2002 00852.46250 20-39-00.5 N HI MD WPFF711 156-21-42.9 W 0000840941 MOBILE TELEPHONE & PAGING INC. KEONEHUNEHUNE 04/08/2002 00853.21250 20-39-00.5 N HI MD WPFF711 156-21-42.9 W 0000840941 MOBILE TELEPHONE & PAGING INC.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-221993A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-221993A1.txt
  • 04/22/2002 00941.40625 42-29-15.0 N IA NE 094-11-18.0 W 0000858619 MidAmerican Energy Company HUMBOLDT 04/22/2002 00932.25625 42-40-38.0 N IA NE 094-11-18.0 W 0000858619 MidAmerican Energy Company HUMBOLDT 04/22/2002 00941.25625 42-40-38.0 N TX NE 095-19-08.6 W 0000859349 The Northeast Texas Consortium (NETnet)TYLER 04/23/2002 06286.19000 32-15-07.7 N TX NE 095-19-08.6 W 0000859349 The Northeast Texas Consortium (NETnet)TYLER 04/23/2002 06315.84000 32-15-07.7 N AR NE 092-11-00.5 W 0000861169 UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANYREDFIELD 04/23/2002 00932.30625 34-26-40.3 N AR NE 092-11-00.5 W 0000861169 UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANYREDFIELD 04/23/2002 00941.30625 34-26-40.3 N PA NE 077-00-26.9 W 0000861399 Winemiller Communications Inc Wertzville 04/23/2002 10795.00000 40-18-19.3 N PA NE 077-00-26.9 W 0000861399 Winemiller Communications Inc Wertzville 04/23/2002 10915.00000 40-18-19.3 N PA NE 077-00-26.9 W 0000861399 Winemiller Communications Inc Wertzville 04/23/2002 11075.00000
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-222214A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-222214A1.txt
  • LLC JERUSALEM 05/01/2002 06750.00000 42-39-27.0 N 0000871869 New York Holdings, LLC JERUSALEM 05/01/2002 06810.00000 42-39-27.0 N 0000871968 Verizon Wireless Texas LLC EVADALE 05/01/2002 06197.24000 30-16-49.7 N Page 18 LA 093-I 3-49.7 w LA 093-I 3-49.7 w LA 093-I 3-49.7 w LA 093-I 3-49.7 w LA 093-I 3-49.7 w NM 106-I 7-35.0 W NM 106-I 7-35.0 W NM 106-17-35.0 W LA 093-40-00.5 w LA 093-40-00.5 w LA 093-40-00.5 w LA 093-40-00.5 w LA 093-40-00.5 w LA 093-40-00.5 w LA 093-40-00.5 w LA 093-40-00.5 w NY 077-06-08.0 W NY 077-06-08.0 W TX 094-02-27.6 W MD MD MD MD MD MD MD MD MD MD MD MD MD MD MD MD MD MD MD I I CF - Common Carrier Fixed Point to Point
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-222502A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-222502A1.txt
  • BROADCASTING LICENSES, INC. ABILENE 05/09/2002 00950.12500 32-27-03.5 N VA MD WMU818 078-50-52.2 W 0000882928 EASY RADIO INC Harrisonburg 05/10/2002 00944.37500 38-25-45.1 N VA MD WMU818 078-50-52.2 W 0000882928 EASY RADIO INC Harrisonburg 05/10/2002 00944.62500 38-25-45.1 N TX NE 095-27-00.4 W 0000875795 KXTJ License, Inc. Houston 05/06/2002 00949.25000 29-44-46.6 N TX NE 094-47-26.7 W 0000875848 KXTJ License, Inc. Liberty 05/06/2002 00948.00000 30-03-00.5 N IA NE 093-46-00.0 W 0000875886 Thomas H. Burke, Receiver for Lifestyle Communications Corp. Osceola 05/06/2002 00950.00000 41-01-59.0 N IA NE 093-35-52.0 W 0000875967 Thomas H. Burke, Receiver for Lifestyle Communications Corp. Des Moines 05/06/2002 00951.00000 41-39-21.0 N IA NE 093-35-52.0 W 0000876016 Thomas H. Burke, Receiver for Lifestyle Communicaltions Corp. Des Moines 05/06/2002 00950.87500 41-39-21.0 N IA NE 093-35-52.0
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-222893A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-222893A1.txt
  • Wireless SHELBY 05/24/2002 40-52-46.0 N GS - Private Carrier Paging, 929-930 MHz State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City NY AM WNLI646 073-24-58.4 W 0000831887 METROCALL USA INC HUNTINGTON 05/22/2002 00929.36250 40-52-45.4 N NY AM WNLI646 074-00-17.5 W 0000831887 METROCALL USA INC MANHATTAN 05/22/2002 00929.36250 40-42-38.4 N NY AM WNLI646 074-00-00.5 W 0000831887 METROCALL USA INC MANHATTAN 05/22/2002 00929.36250 40-44-12.4 N NJ AM WNLI646 074-04-50.0 W 0000831887 METROCALL USA INC TINTON FALLS 05/22/2002 00929.36250 40-16-41.0 N NY AM WNLI646 073-53-09.5 W 0000831887 METROCALL USA INC YONKERS 05/22/2002 00929.36250 40-58-07.4 N NY AM WNWB486 072-20-54.0 W 0000831888 METROCALL USA INC NOYACK 05/22/2002 00929.36250 40-58-19.0 N GX - SMR, 806-821/851-866 MHz, Conventional State
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-223320A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-223320A1.txt
  • electronically (electronic mail or facsimile), by hand delivery, or by overnight delivery service other than U.S. Postal Service Express and Priority Mail. AF - Aeronautical and Fixed State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City CA AM 116-58-48.9 W 0000865796 Lancair Corp San Diego 06/06/2002 00122.95000 32-34-20.3 N MN MD WSF39 093-13-00.5 W 0000912747 AERONAUTICAL RADIO INC Hampton 06/04/2002 00130.85000 44-35-17.8 N NC NE 081-53-28.0 W 0000911184 Elk River Property Owners' Association Banner Elk 06/03/2002 00122.97500 36-09-30.0 N WI NE 089-28-02.8 W 0000913903 Aeronautical Radio Inc Rhinelander 06/05/2002 00128.85000 45-37-52.3 N HI NE 156-02-44.2 W 0000913949 Aeronautical Radio Inc Kailua-Kona 06/05/2002 00129.90000 19-44-19.5 N HI NE 155-02-54.4 W 0000913959 Aeronautical Radio Inc
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-224621A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-224621A1.txt
  • 38-12-47.5 N LA NE 090-39-54.0 W 0000965355 MURPHY EXPLORATION & PRODUCTION COMPANY CHAUVIN 07/17/2002 00122.80000 29-14-48.0 N GM NE 089-27-13.0 W 0000966039 MURPHY EXPLORATION & PRODUCTION COMPANY OFFSHORE 07/17/2002 00122.80000 28-23-33.0 N GM NE 090-49-54.2 W 0000966054 MURPHY EXPLORATION & PRODUCTION COMPANY OFFSHORE 07/17/2002 00122.80000 28-49-59.6 N GM NE 090-14-03.0 W 0000966061 MURPHY EXPLORATIONS & PRODUCTION COMPANY OFFSHORE 07/17/2002 00122.80000 28-47-00.5 N GM NE 091-17-11.4 W 0000966066 MURPHY EXPLORATION & PRODUCTION COMPANY OFFSHORE 07/17/2002 00122.80000 28-28-38.5 N AL RM KXK4 085-54-06.8 W 0000968982 ENTERPRISE, CITY OF ENTERPRISE 07/19/2002 00122.80000 31-17-54.6 N RO WAE6 0000964180 NEW RICHMOND, CITY OF 07/16/2002 RO WIH2 0000968384 LA JUNTA, CITY OF 07/18/2002 Page 2 AS - Aural Studio Transmitter Link State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-225370A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-225370A1.txt
  • 106-19-34.1 W 0000989894 CASPER, CITY OF CASPER 08/07/2002 10615.62500 42-51-04.9 N Page 44 MW - Microwave Public Safety Pool State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City WY NE 106-21-43.1 W 0000989897 CASPER, CITY OF CASPER 08/07/2002 10550.62500 42-44-26.9 N PA NE 074-55-06.5 W 0000990209 BUCKS, COUNTY OF BENSALEM 08/08/2002 10567.50000 40-05-00.5 N FL NE P 081-57-14.0 W 0000990432 CITY OF LAKELAND POLICE DEPARTMENT LAKELAND 08/08/2002 02474.43750 28-02-46.0 N FL NE 081-30-29.0 W 0000991176 Apopka City of Apopka 08/08/2002 10556.25000 28-40-19.0 N FL NE 081-30-29.0 W 0000991176 Apopka City of Apopka 08/08/2002 10621.25000 28-40-19.0 N NY RM WNTD938 073-13-14.4 W 0000986850 SUFFOLK, COUNTY OF HAUPPAUGE 08/05/2002 06755.00000 40-48-33.3 N NY RM WNTD938
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-225542A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-225542A1.txt
  • Fixed Satellite Service "MOD" to add an additional antenna to it's existing earth station license, and relocate it's fixed earth station. 35 ° 35 ' 0.00 " N LAT. SITE ID: 1 350 DAWSEN STREET, MONROE, VONORE, TN 84 ° 13 ' 0.00 " W LONG. LOCATION: PRODELIN 1 2.4 meters ANTENNA ID: 1246 51.70 dBW 128 KBIT QPSK RATE 0.5 FEC 14000.0000 - 14500.0000 MHz 179KG7D 52.20 dBW 192 KBIT QPSK RATE 0.5 FEC 14000.0000 - 14500.0000 MHz 269KG7D 52.20 dBW 256 KBIT QPSK RATE 0.5 FEC 14000.0000 - 14500.0000 MHz 358KG7D 192 KBIT QPSK RATE 0.5 FEC 11700.0000 - 12200.0000 MHz 269KG7D 256 KBIT QPSK RATE 0.5 FEC 11700.0000 - 12200.0000 MHz 358KG7D 128 KBIT QPSK RATE 0.5 FEC
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-225574A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-225574A1.txt
  • Monroe 08/15/2002 00129.62500 32-30-39.1 N Page 1 AF - Aeronautical and Fixed State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City AL NE 087-36-36.8 W 0000998235 Aeronautical Radio Inc Muscle Shoals 08/15/2002 00129.62500 34-44-43.1 N GM NE 092-41-05.4 W 0000998292 Aeronautical Radio Inc Gulf of Mexico 08/15/2002 00129.77500 28-03-09.9 N GM NE 093-44-00.5 W 0000998309 Aeronautical Radio Inc Gulf of Mexico 08/15/2002 00129.77500 28-28-00.9 N SC NE 082-13-07.8 W 0000998317 Aeronautical Radio Inc Greer 08/15/2002 00131.20000 34-53-44.4 N NH RM WBO7 071-11-48.3 W 0000997050 STATE OR NEW HAMPSHIRE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION DIVISION OF AERONAUTICS GORHAM 08/14/2002 00122.80000 44-23-35.2 N WA RM WYC2 119-19-04.1 W 0000997739 AERONAUTICAL RADIO INC MOSES LAKE 08/15/2002 00131.95000 47-11-59.5
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-226134A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-226134A1.txt
  • 0001018912 ROUTT COUNTY HAYDEN 09/04/2002 06615.00000 40-31-27.4 N CO NE 107-16-55.5 W 0001018912 ROUTT COUNTY HAYDEN 09/04/2002 06665.00000 40-31-27.4 N CO NE 107-16-55.5 W 0001018912 ROUTT COUNTY HAYDEN 09/04/2002 11623.12500 40-31-27.4 N OH NE 084-34-16.0 W 0001018962 Hamilton, County of Cincinnati 09/04/2002 06605.00000 39-11-32.0 N OH NE 084-34-16.0 W 0001018962 Hamilton, County of Cincinnati 09/04/2002 06665.00000 39-11-32.0 N MN NE 096-39-00.5 W 0001019375 STATE OF MINNESOTA Angus 09/05/2002 06585.00000 48-02-02.7 N MN NE 096-39-00.5 W 0001019375 STATE OF MINNESOTA Angus 09/05/2002 06645.00000 48-02-02.7 N MN NE 096-37-02.0 W 0001019393 State of Minnesota CROOKSTON 09/05/2002 06745.00000 47-45-45.0 N MN NE 096-11-20.0 W 0001019462 State Of Minnesota THIEF RIVER FALLS 09/05/2002 06805.00000 48-06-54.0 N MN NE 093-54-33.0 W 0001019623 State of Minnesota Enfield
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-226592A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-226592A1.txt
  • MICRODYNE 1 5 meters ANTENNA ID: SATRO-5M 3700.0000 - 4200.0000 MHz 36000F9 Points of Communication: 1 - ALSAT - (ALSAT) Renewal 11/09/2002 - 11/09/2017 Date Effective: 09/18/2002 Class of Station: Fixed Earth Stations Grant of Authority TCI CABLEVISION OF OREGON, INC. E930049 SES-RWL-20020906-01518P Nature of Service:Domestic Fixed Satellite Service 44 ° 0 ' 4.00 " N LAT. SITE ID: 1 0.5 MI. W OF WILLAMETTE ST & 52ND ST, LANE, EUGENE, OR 123 ° 6 ' 21.00 " W LONG. LOCATION: SCIENTIFIC-ATLANTA 1 4.5 meters ANTENNA ID: 8345 4.5 METER 3700.0000 - 4200.0000 MHz 25M0F8W Points of Communication: 1 - ALSAT - (ALSAT) Renewal 10/05/2002 - 10/05/2017 Date Effective: 09/20/2002 Class of Station: Fixed Earth Stations Grant of Authority COMMUNITY TELEVISION
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-226838A14.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-226838A14.txt
  • Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Mkt rank Market Calls Affil O&O ? Ownership 5:30 pm rtg 5:30 pm sh 6 pm rtg 6 pm sh Local News Hours Public Affairs Hours 5 SF KGO ABC 1 ABC Inc. 7 15 8 16 20 0.5 5 SF KRON NBC 1 NBC/GE 7 15 6 12 24 2.5 5 SF KPIX CBS 1 CBS 4 8 5 10 17 5 SF KNTV WB Granite 1 2 1 2 23 3.5 5 SF KTVU FOX Cox 2 5 33.5 1 6 Boston WCVB ABC Hearst-Argyle 9 18 8 15 20 1 6 Boston WHDH NBC Sunbeam TV
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-226838A17.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-226838A17.txt
  • PHONE SURVEY AUGUST 23-SEPTEMBER 1; 3-5, 2002 TABLE 019 (continued) Q9. WHICH INTERNET SITES, IF ANY, HAVE YOU USED IN THE PAST 7 DAYS AS A SOURCE OF LOCAL OR NATIONAL NEWS AND CURRENT AFFAIRS? BASE: RESPONDENTS WHO GET NEWS FROM INTERNET SITES TOTAL ----- AT&T.NET 1.1 WASHINGTONPOST.COM 1.1 WALLSTREETJOURNAL. COM 1.0 OTHER 34.9 NONE 7.3 DON'T KNOW 3.5 REFUSE 0.5 DATA BASED UPON FEWER THAN 145 RESPONDENTS DO NOT MEET MINIMUM REPORTING STANDARDS AND ARE SUPPLIED FOR INTERNAL USE ONLY. RESPONSES MAY ADD TO MORE THAN 100% DUE TO MULTIPLE RESPONSES COPYRIGHT 2002 NIELSEN MEDIA RESEARCH, INC. NIELSEN MEDIA RESEARCH PAGE: 22 FCC PHONE SURVEY AUGUST 23-SEPTEMBER 1; 3-5, 2002 TABLE 020 Q10. WHAT SINGLE SOURCE DO YOU USE MOST
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-226838A20.doc
  • the most weight, data from markets 99 and 101 get the next most weight, and so forth. The particular smoothing method employed is called ``loess'' and is described in William S. Cleveland, The Elements of Graphing Data (Hobart Press, 1994). The specific implementation is from the ``loess'' command in the statistical package ``S-PLUS 2000'', with the smoothing parameter set to 0.5. For March 2001 and March 2002, the Metro market revenue is equated to the sum of the station revenue for stations assigned (``home'') to their Metro market. In previous years, Metro market revenue was used. In some cases the differences between these measures of market revenue were the result of out-of-Metro market stations that earned a share of the Metro
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-226838A22.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-226838A22.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-226838A22.txt
  • TBS, Lifetime, and Nick at Nite. The average number of households delivered per network was 1.4 million (for the full sample of 33 networks it was 0.6 million). In 1990, the four largest were USA, TBS, ESPN, and CNN, with an average number of households delivered per network of 1.1 million (for the full sample of 15 networks it was 0.5 million). Thus, in 1990, the major broadcast networks delivered audiences on average nine times as big as those for the largest cable networks. In 2000 the broadcast audience averaged 5.6 times the size of the cable audience on a per network basis. Even the new broadcast networks UPN and WB delivered audiences almost twice as big as the largest cable
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-226838A23.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-226838A23.txt
  • ABC 1 ABC Inc. 7 14 8 14 Oprah 14 14 14 13 21 3 1 New York WCBS CBS 1 CBS 3 7 4 7 7 7 8 26.5 1 1 New York WNYW FOX 1 FOX 8 7 7 15.5 1 5 SF KGO ABC 1 ABC Inc. 7 15 8 16 Oprah 16 14 15 18 20 0.5 5 SF KRON NBC 1 NBC/GE 7 15 6 12 12 15 13 24 2.5 5 SF KPIX CBS 1 CBS 4 8 5 10 9 10 11 17 5 SF KNTV WB Granite 1 2 1 2 23 3.5 5 SF KTVU FOX Cox 2 5 5 5 6 33.5 1 6 Boston WCVB ABC Hearst-Argyle 9 18 8
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-226884A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-226884A1.txt
  • to add an additional antenna to it's existing earth station license, and relocate it's fixed earth station. Page 17 of 28 35 ° 35 ' 0.00 " N LAT. SITE ID: 1 350 DAWSEN STREET, MONROE, VONORE, TN 84 ° 13 ' 0.00 " W LONG. LOCATION: PRODELIN 1 2.4 meters ANTENNA ID: 1246 51.70 dBW 128 KBIT QPSK RATE 0.5 FEC 14000.0000 - 14500.0000 MHz 179KG7D 52.20 dBW 192 KBIT QPSK RATE 0.5 FEC 14000.0000 - 14500.0000 MHz 269KG7D 52.20 dBW 256 KBIT QPSK RATE 0.5 FEC 14000.0000 - 14500.0000 MHz 358KG7D 192 KBIT QPSK RATE 0.5 FEC 11700.0000 - 12200.0000 MHz 269KG7D 256 KBIT QPSK RATE 0.5 FEC 11700.0000 - 12200.0000 MHz 358KG7D 128 KBIT QPSK RATE 0.5 FEC
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-226886A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-226886A1.txt
  • W 0001041960 WCTV Licensee Corp. Tallahassee 09/27/2002 11365.00000 30-28-31.7 N MT NE 112-01-11.9 W 0001041976 Touch America Helena 09/27/2002 22525.00000 46-35-30.9 N CA NE 114-31-18.4 W 0001042128 SOUTHWESTERN BELL MOBILE SYSTEMS, LLC BLYTHE 09/27/2002 10616.25000 33-57-39.3 N CL - Cellular State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City AZ MD KNKN208 110-40-00.5 W 0001037212 SMITH BAGLEY, INC. Hotevilla 09/24/2002 35-54-49.0 N WY MD KNKN259 109-17-52.5 W 0001037570 UNION TELEPHONE COMPANY ROCK SPRINGS 09/24/2002 41-55-00.9 N GS - Private Carrier Paging, 929-930 MHz State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City CA NE 122-25-52.9 W 0001035430 DX RADIO SYSTEMS, INC. DALY CITY 09/23/2002 00929.06250
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-227651A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-227651A1.txt
  • OF CALIFORNIA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP CLOVERDALE 10/15/2002 10623.75000 38-43-59.7 N CA MD WPNH345 119-37-02.7 W 0001058355 Southwestern Bell Mobile Systems, LLC BUTTONWILLOW 10/15/2002 17705.00000 35-33-37.0 N CA MD WPNH345 119-37-02.7 W 0001058355 Southwestern Bell Mobile Systems, LLC BUTTONWILLOW 10/15/2002 17725.00000 35-33-37.0 N CA MD WPNH345 119-37-02.7 W 0001058355 Southwestern Bell Mobile Systems, LLC BUTTONWILLOW 10/15/2002 17885.00000 35-33-37.0 N CA MD WPOS876 120-36-00.5 W 0001058528 Southwestern Bell Mobile Systems, LLC SAN LUIS OBISPO 10/15/2002 10566.25000 35-18-30.2 N CA MD WPOS874 120-39-25.0 W 0001058535 Southwestern Bell Mobile Systems, LLC SAN LUIS OBISPO 10/15/2002 10631.25000 35-21-39.5 N CA MD WPOS874 120-39-25.0 W 0001058535 Southwestern Bell Mobile Systems, LLC SAN LUIS OBISPO 10/15/2002 10638.75000 35-21-39.5 N CA MD WPOS874 120-39-25.0 W 0001058535 Southwestern Bell Mobile Systems,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-228408A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-228408A1.txt
  • KNKN614 090-00-19.3 W 0000935551 LOUISIANA RSA NO. 7 CELLULAR GENERAL PARTNERSHIP Frankllinton 11/05/2002 30-52-00.7 N LA AM KNKN614 090-00-19.3 W 0000935551 LOUISIANA RSA NO. 7 CELLULAR GENERAL PARTNERSHIP Frankllinton 11/05/2002 30-52-00.7 N LA AM KNKN614 089-49-59.5 W 0000935551 LOUISIANA RSA NO. 7 CELLULAR GENERAL PARTNERSHIP Varnado 11/05/2002 30-52-26.0 N NV MD KNKA368 115-58-16.1 W 0001084350 Southwestco Wireless Limited PartnershipPahrump 11/07/2002 36-14-00.5 N GS - Private Carrier Paging, 929-930 MHz State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City IL RM WPLQ831 088-51-51.4 W 0001082718 CHRYSLER CORPORATION BELVIDERE 10/31/2002 00929.03750 42-14-11.1 N GX - SMR, 806-821/851-866 MHz, Conventional State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-228541A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-228541A1.txt
  • to operate C-band transponders on the TDRS-5 satellite. Specifically, Columbia requests any necessary authority to provide space segment used for direct-to-home services over this fixed-satellite service facility. Modification MOTIENT SERVICES, INC. AMSC-1 SAT-MOD-19960919-00116P Original File No. 163-SAT-ML-96 Motient Services, Inc. (formerly AMSC Subsidiary Corporation) filed an application for permanent authority to modify the AMSC-1 satellite to repoint the L-band antenna 0.5 deg. east and reduce spectrum in eastern beam. Modification SES Americom, Inc. SAT H-1 SAT-MOD-20021108-00204E SES AMERICOM, Inc. has filed an application for modification of its authorization to operate the AMC-1 satellite. SES AMERICOM requests any necessary authority to provide space segment used for direct-to-home services over this fixed-satellite service facility. SES AMERICOM also requests classification of the AMC-1 license
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-228932A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-228932A1.txt
  • IA NE 095-43-31.4 W 0001096047 USCOC OF GREATER IOWA, INC. COUNCIL BLUFFS 11/19/2002 06197.24000 41-20-03.1 N IA NE 095-43-31.4 W 0001096047 USCOC OF GREATER IOWA, INC. COUNCIL BLUFFS 11/19/2002 06615.00000 41-20-03.1 N IA NE 095-39-07.5 W 0001096082 USCOC OF GREATER IOWA, INC. UNDERWOOD 11/19/2002 06775.00000 41-24-49.1 N IA NE 095-27-53.3 W 0001096114 USCOC OF GREATER IOWA, INC SHELBY 11/19/2002 05945.20000 41-30-00.5 N IA NE 095-27-53.3 W 0001096114 USCOC OF GREATER IOWA, INC SHELBY 11/19/2002 06093.45000 41-30-00.5 N IA NE 095-27-53.3 W 0001096114 USCOC OF GREATER IOWA, INC SHELBY 11/19/2002 06610.00000 41-30-00.5 N AZ NE 112-07-03.0 W 0001096266 ALLTEL Communications of the Southwest Limited Partnership Jerome 11/19/2002 10662.50000 34-42-05.0 N OH NE 081-28-22.6 W 0001096675 NewPar Akron 11/20/2002 06063.80000 41-05-48.2 N OH
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-229150A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-229150A1.txt
  • W 0001101691 Christian Broadcasting of Idaho Twin Falls 11/25/2002 12787.50000 42-34-41.7 N ID NE 114-24-00.1 W 0001102521 Christian Broadcasting of Idaho Twin Falls 11/25/2002 13037.50000 42-34-41.7 N ID NE 114-24-00.1 W 0001102521 Christian Broadcasting of Idaho Twin Falls 11/25/2002 13062.50000 42-34-41.7 N UT NE 112-00-42.8 W 0001102600 FOX TV STATIONS, INC. SALT LAKE CITY 11/25/2002 12712.50000 40-46-37.8 N OH NE 082-06-00.5 W 0001102993 OHIO UNIVERSITY ATHENS 11/26/2002 13150.00000 - 13175.00000 39-19-41.2 N Page 21 TS - TV Studio Transmitter Link State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City CA NE 117-35-11.1 W 0001105601 KVMD Corp. Ontario 11/29/2002 07037.50000 34-03-59.0 N YK - Industrial/Business Pool - Commercial, Trunked State Purpose Call Sign Longitude
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-229201A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-229201A1.txt
  • W 0001101691 Christian Broadcasting of Idaho Twin Falls 11/25/2002 12787.50000 42-34-41.7 N ID NE 114-24-00.1 W 0001102521 Christian Broadcasting of Idaho Twin Falls 11/25/2002 13037.50000 42-34-41.7 N ID NE 114-24-00.1 W 0001102521 Christian Broadcasting of Idaho Twin Falls 11/25/2002 13062.50000 42-34-41.7 N UT NE 112-00-42.8 W 0001102600 FOX TV STATIONS, INC. SALT LAKE CITY 11/25/2002 12712.50000 40-46-37.8 N OH NE 082-06-00.5 W 0001102993 OHIO UNIVERSITY ATHENS 11/26/2002 13150.00000 - 13175.00000 39-19-41.2 N Page 21 TS - TV Studio Transmitter Link State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City CA NE 117-35-11.1 W 0001105601 KVMD Corp. Ontario 11/29/2002 07037.50000 34-03-59.0 N YK - Industrial/Business Pool - Commercial, Trunked State Purpose Call Sign Longitude
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-229376A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-229376A1.txt
  • N CT MD KNKA418 072-00-34.8 W 0001106300 Southwestern Bell Mobile Systems, LLC Groton 12/02/2002 41-20-36.8 N CT MD KNKA418 071-55-38.4 W 0001106300 Southwestern Bell Mobile Systems, LLC NORTH STONINGTON 12/02/2002 41-27-35.4 N CT MD KNKA418 071-54-06.5 W 0001106300 Southwestern Bell Mobile Systems, LLC STONINGTON 12/02/2002 41-22-58.2 N CT MD KNKA241 072-49-10.9 W 0001106351 Southwestern Bell Mobile Systems, LLC BRANFORD 12/02/2002 41-19-00.5 N CT MD KNKA241 072-39-29.7 W 0001106351 Southwestern Bell Mobile Systems, LLC GUILFORD 12/02/2002 41-17-19.3 N CT MD KNKA241 072-43-18.5 W 0001106351 Southwestern Bell Mobile Systems, LLC GUILFORD 12/02/2002 41-19-48.1 N CT MD KNKA241 073-00-43.0 W 0001106351 Southwestern Bell Mobile Systems, LLC MILFORD 12/02/2002 41-14-25.5 N WI MD KNKA600 087-48-35.2 W 0001106760 Milwaukee SMSA Limited Partnership HOLLAND 12/02/2002 43-35-09.5 N
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-229919A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-229919A1.txt
  • than U.S. Postal Service Express and Priority Mail. AF - Aeronautical and Fixed State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City MI AM 084-35-14.4 W 0000964459 Aeronautical Radio Inc Lansing 12/19/2002 00129.82500 42-46-43.3 N AZ MD WPWK203 112-00-29.0 W 0001122998 Aeronautical Radio Inc Phoenix 12/16/2002 00129.30000 35-26-03.0 N GM MD WPWA423 093-44-00.5 W 0001123216 Aeronautical Radio Inc Gulf of Mexico 12/16/2002 00129.10000 28-28-00.9 N GM MD WPWA422 092-41-05.4 W 0001123226 Aeronautical Radio Inc Gulf of Mexico 12/16/2002 00129.10000 28-03-09.9 N GM MD KDO4 088-47-50.1 W 0001123276 AERONAUTICAL RADIO INC OFFSHORE 12/16/2002 00129.70000 29-36-23.7 N CA MD WPWD591 116-30-24.1 W 0001129998 Aeronautical Radio Inc Palm Springs 12/20/2002 00136.52500 33-49-46.8 N Page 1 AF
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-230012A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-230012A1.txt
  • 3 CF - Common Carrier Fixed Point to Point Microwave State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City OR MD WMN441 123-55-22.4 W 0001131412 Verizon Wireless (VAW) LLC SEASIDE 12/23/2002 18080.00000 45-59-36.3 N WA MD WPNN516 123-53-12.5 W 0001131440 Verizon Wireless (VAW) LLC CHINOOK 12/23/2002 06675.00000 46-15-44.3 N OR MD WMN740 123-49-00.5 W 0001131450 Verizon Wireless (VAW) LLC ASTORIA 12/23/2002 06645.00000 46-10-53.3 N TX MD WMJ237 097-37-20.0 W 0001132716 Texas Cellular Telephone Company, L.P.AUSTIN 12/24/2002 06034.15000 30-19-17.7 N TX MD WMJ237 097-37-20.0 W 0001132716 Texas Cellular Telephone Company, L.P.AUSTIN 12/24/2002 06093.45000 30-19-17.7 N TX MD WPJA735 097-49-56.0 W 0001132730 Texas Cellular Telephone Company, L.P.AUSTIN 12/24/2002 06345.49000 30-14-04.7 N TX MD WMJ236 097-40-56.0
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-230093A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-230093A1.txt
  • 39-44-47.0 N Page 6 CF - Common Carrier Fixed Point to Point Microwave State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City CA NE 116-09-44.0 W 0001138545 Nextel of California, Inc Baker 12/31/2002 10576.25000 35-11-33.0 N OR NE 120-49-44.9 W 0001140401 UNITED STATES CELLULAR OPERATING COMPANY OF MEDFORD SUMMER LAKE 01/02/2003 06116.30500 42-59-00.5 N OR NE 120-49-44.9 W 0001140401 UNITED STATES CELLULAR OPERATING COMPANY OF MEDFORD SUMMER LAKE 01/02/2003 06565.00000 42-59-00.5 N OR NE 120-04-29.9 W 0001140437 UNITED STATES CELLULAR OPERATING COMPANY OF MEDFORD RILEY 01/02/2003 06368.34500 43-33-25.5 N OR NE 120-04-29.9 W 0001140437 UNITED STATES CELLULAR OPERATING COMPANY OF MEDFORD RILEY 01/02/2003 06595.62500 43-33-25.5 N OR NE 119-07-53.8 W 0001140463 UNITED STATES
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-230456A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-230456A1.txt
  • 01/16/2003 00952.10625 47-07-51.0 N MN NE P 093-24-09.5 W 0001161387 Osseo, City of Osseo 01/16/2003 00952.28125 45-07-14.6 N GA NE P 082-52-02.5 W 0001161412 ELBERTON, CITY OF ELBERTON 01/16/2003 00956.26875 34-06-48.4 N TX NE 100-55-40.0 W 0001161630 IRVIN AUTOMOTIVE PRODUCTS INC. DEL RIO 01/16/2003 22477.00000 29-21-36.0 N TX NE 106-17-58.0 W 0001161642 EPSON EL PASO INC. EL PASO 01/16/2003 21252.00000 31-43-00.5 N Page 29 MG - Microwave Industrial/Business Pool State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City TX NE 106-23-26.0 W 0001161649 COOPER LIGHTING INC. EL PASO 01/16/2003 21241.50000 31-46-22.0 N TX NE 106-23-26.0 W 0001161653 A. O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS COMPANY EL PASO 01/16/2003 21231.00000 31-46-22.0 N TX NE 106-23-26.0 W
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-230620A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-230620A1.txt
  • L.P. HOLLY 01/24/2003 06345.49000 42-47-02.1 N MI MD WHU27 083-32-04.8 W 0001171644 AMCI Acquisition, L.P. HOLLY 01/24/2003 06404.79000 42-47-02.1 N CA MD WLV362 118-14-13.2 W 0001171905 LOS ANGELES SMSA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP LA CRESENTA 01/24/2003 10643.75000 34-16-04.0 N CL - Cellular State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City AZ AM KNKN208 110-40-00.5 W 0001037212 SMITH BAGLEY, INC. Hotevilla 01/22/2003 35-54-49.0 N CO MD KNKN347 102-12-57.9 W 0001170879 PLATTE RIVER CELLULAR OF COLORADO LIMITED PARTNERSHIP Idalia 01/24/2003 39-40-33.8 N VA MD KNKQ314 078-51-50.0 W 0001171056 Southern & Central Wireless, LLC Harrisonburg 01/24/2003 38-29-23.0 N VA MD KNKQ314 078-45-46.0 W 0001171056 Southern & Central Wireless, LLC TIMBERVILLE 01/24/2003 38-39-04.0 N MG - Microwave Industrial/Business
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-230940A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-230940A1.txt
  • 118-03-56.9 W 0001177943 LOS ANGELES SMSA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP EL MONTE 01/29/2003 10582.50000 34-04-17.5 N CA NE 118-03-56.9 W 0001177943 LOS ANGELES SMSA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP EL MONTE 01/29/2003 10593.12500 34-04-17.5 N CA NE 118-03-56.9 W 0001177943 LOS ANGELES SMSA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP EL MONTE 01/29/2003 19685.00000 34-04-17.5 N MA NE 072-27-15.4 W 0001177968 AT&T Wireless Services of Florida, Inc. Belchertown 01/29/2003 19305.00000 42-20-00.5 N MA NE 072-24-56.1 W 0001178004 AT&T Wireless Services of Florida, Inc. Belchertown 01/29/2003 19325.00000 42-16-15.5 N MA NE 072-32-22.5 W 0001178015 AT&T Wireless Services of Florida, Inc. Granby 01/29/2003 17765.00000 42-15-14.8 N MA NE 072-32-22.5 W 0001178015 AT&T Wireless Services of Florida, Inc. Granby 01/29/2003 17950.00000 42-15-14.8 N MA NE 072-33-31.2 W 0001178026 AT&T Wireless Services of Florida, Inc.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-231320A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-231320A1.txt
  • MD WHC784 096-15-03.8 W 0001196068 CenterPoint Energy Inc. FAIR OAKS 02/12/2003 00953.95000 31-25-52.6 N AZ MD WPQX854 P 110-58-48.0 W 0001196246 Southwest Gas Corporation TUCSON 02/12/2003 00956.36875 32-12-59.3 N GA MD WNTJ978 083-29-01.0 W 0001196578 GEORGIA POWER COMPANY MADISON 02/12/2003 00928.51875 33-33-47.0 N GA MD WNTJ978 083-29-01.0 W 0001196578 GEORGIA POWER COMPANY MADISON 02/12/2003 00952.51875 33-33-47.0 N GA MD WNTK550 083-15-00.5 W 0001196594 GEORGIA POWER COMPANY MILLEDGEVILLE 02/12/2003 00928.18125 33-05-42.5 N GA MD WNTK550 083-15-00.5 W 0001196594 GEORGIA POWER COMPANY MILLEDGEVILLE 02/12/2003 00952.18125 33-05-42.5 N CA MD WPQY226 P 116-50-20.4 W 0001197260 Southwest Gas Corporation BIG BEAR 02/13/2003 00956.34375 34-15-39.6 N NV MD WPJF805 P 115-13-24.0 W 0001197427 SOUTHWEST GAS CORPORATION LAS VEGAS 02/13/2003 00956.28125 36-12-20.8 N CA MD WPQY967 P
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-231527A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-231527A1.txt
  • INC APPLETON 02/19/2003 06315.84000 44-15-39.9 N WI AM WLB939 088-24-25.3 W 0001112291 NORLIGHT INC APPLETON 02/19/2003 06345.49000 44-15-39.9 N WI AM WLB939 088-24-25.3 W 0001112291 NORLIGHT INC APPLETON 02/19/2003 06375.14000 44-15-39.9 N WI AM WLB939 088-24-25.3 W 0001112291 NORLIGHT INC APPLETON 02/19/2003 06375.14000 44-15-39.9 N WI AM WLB939 088-24-25.3 W 0001112291 NORLIGHT INC APPLETON 02/19/2003 06404.79000 44-15-39.9 N CA AM 116-57-00.5 W 0001127147 LOS ANGELES SMSA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP HEMET 02/20/2003 10593.75000 33-43-16.0 N CO AM 102-32-19.0 W 0001128541 Smokey Hill Cellular of Colorado Limited Partnership FIRSTVIEW 02/18/2003 05945.20000 38-47-15.0 N CO AM 102-32-19.0 W 0001128541 Smokey Hill Cellular of Colorado Limited Partnership FIRSTVIEW 02/18/2003 06034.15000 38-47-15.0 N CA AM 118-06-22.4 W 0001154535 LOS ANGELES SMSA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP CERRITOS 02/20/2003 10588.75000 33-52-29.0
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-232006A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-232006A1.txt
  • 42-18-12.3 N MA MD KC26365 P 071-13-06.1 W 0001222376 FOX TELEVISION STATIONS INC. NEEDHAM 03/06/2003 02467.00000 - 02483.50000 42-18-12.3 N NE O 0001219675 THE SCH. BD. OF MARION CTY., FLORIDA 03/04/2003 06875.00000 - 07125.00000 TS - TV Studio Transmitter Link State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City OH MD WBE774 082-06-00.5 W 0001218009 OHIO UNIVERSITY ATHENS 03/03/2003 13200.00000 - 13225.00000 39-19-41.2 N CA NE 118-23-18.5 W 0001223697 TELEFUTURA LOS ANGELES LLC Los Angeles 03/06/2003 07062.50000 33-58-35.8 N CO NE 108-33-08.9 W 0001225549 SOUTHWEST COLORADO TV TRANSLATOR ASSN. Cortez 03/07/2003 12912.50000 37-20-55.6 N CO NE 108-33-08.9 W 0001225554 SOUTHWEST COLORADO TV TRANSLATOR ASSN. Cortez 03/07/2003 12962.50000 37-20-55.6 N CO NE 108-33-08.9 W
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-233092A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-233092A1.txt
  • POWER COMPANY 04/04/2003 Page 13 MG - Microwave Industrial/Business Pool State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City RO WNTJ978 0001263424 GEORGIA POWER COMPANY 04/04/2003 MW - Microwave Public Safety Pool State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City AZ MD WPQR446 112-04-00.5 W 0001255661 PHOENIX, CITY OF PHOENIX 03/31/2003 11375.00000 33-19-57.2 N WA MD WPSM335 120-52-10.9 W 0001255718 WASHINGTON, STATE OF Cle Elum 03/31/2003 05945.20000 47-08-15.4 N WA MD WPSM335 120-52-10.9 W 0001255718 WASHINGTON, STATE OF Cle Elum 03/31/2003 06123.10000 47-08-15.4 N AZ MD WPQR399 111-57-10.5 W 0001255736 PHOENIX, CITY OF TEMPE 03/31/2003 10715.00000 33-20-27.2 N MN MD WPWD884 092-25-11.7 W 0001256764
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-233268A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-233268A1.txt
  • ENTERCOM BOSTON LICENSE, LLC FRAMINGHAM 04/08/2003 00455.75000 42-23-49.3 N FL MD KPN766 081-25-16.0 W 0001270902 FLORIDA BROADCASTERS ORLANDO 04/10/2003 00450.92500 28-34-48.0 N TN NE C 0001269088 MEMPHIS/SHELBY COUNTY PUBLIC LIBRARY & INFO CNTR. 04/09/2003 00161.73000 TI - TV Intercity Relay State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City AZ AM WMU860 111-07-00.5 W 0001186684 RAYCOM AMERICA, INC. South Tucson 04/08/2003 07062.50000 32-14-56.4 N AZ MD WPUP304 112-01-08.5 W 0001264395 UNIVISION TELEVISION GROUP, INC. Phoenix 04/07/2003 06912.50000 33-23-31.9 N AZ MD WPUP626 111-24-36.5 W 0001264396 UNIVISION TELEVISION GROUP, INC. Payson 04/07/2003 07037.50000 33-54-21.4 N AZ MD WPUP628 111-30-16.0 W 0001264397 UNIVISION TELEVISION GROUP, INC. Strawberry 04/07/2003 07087.50000 34-25-52.0 N Page 30 TI -
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-233444A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-233444A1.txt
  • system modifications to its licensed system configuration to integrate the 103° W.L. system into the SPACEWAY system, improve system performance, increase capacity for subscriber services, optimize the cost effectiveness of services to customers and ensure that the system design (as modified) meets all provisions of the FCC's Ka-Band rules. Specifically, the significant changes include: Use of 112 satellite receive beams (0.5 degrees each); Use of phased-array antennas for downlink transmissions through small, hopping spot beams with higher EIRP, and greater antenna pointing accuracy and control; Addition of a downlink broadcasting capability through multiple wide-area beams on each polarization to cover wide geographic areas; A variety of user uplink data transmission rates to support different user terminal sizes, and a higher downlink
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-233951A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-233951A1.txt
  • Company Hatch 04/24/2003 00956.25625 32-32-45.0 N Page 22 MG - Microwave Industrial/Business Pool State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City TX NE P 106-00-15.9 W 0001286623 El Paso Electric Company Alamo Alto 04/24/2003 00956.25625 31-28-40.3 N TX NE P 104-50-11.8 W 0001287499 El Paso Electric Company Van Horn 04/25/2003 00956.25625 31-02-00.5 N TX NE P 097-00-59.0 W 0001287591 GRAND PRAIRIE, CITY OF GRAND PRAIRIE 04/25/2003 00956.39375 32-41-31.0 N TX NE P 097-00-59.0 W 0001287591 GRAND PRAIRIE, CITY OF GRAND PRAIRIE 04/25/2003 00956.39375 32-41-31.0 N MT NE 107-31-59.3 W 0001287696 EnCana Energy Resources, Inc Whitewater 04/25/2003 00928.04375 48-45-04.0 N MT NE 107-31-59.3 W 0001287696 EnCana Energy Resources, Inc Whitewater 04/25/2003 00952.04375 48-45-04.0
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-234231A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-234231A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-234231A1.txt
  • Grant Date: 04/15/2003 Licensee Name: J.D.G. TELEVISION, INC. Requested Facility: Ch No:50 N Latitude: 36-24-47; W Longitude: 93-57-16 ERP (Average): 3 kW; HAAT: 267 meters; Antenna: DA Facility ID: 68058 Call Sign: WHSG-DT File No: BDSTA-20030326AIH City: MONROE State: GA Grant Date: 04/10/2003 Licensee Name: TRINITY BROADCASTING NETWORK Requested Facility: Ch No:44 N Latitude: 33-49-22; W Longitude: 83-53-49 ERP (Average): 0.5 kW; HAAT: 103 meters; Antenna: ND Facility ID: 67993 Call Sign: WTBY-DT File No: BDSTA-20030326AII City: POUGHKEEPSIE State: NY Grant Date: 04/10/2003 Licensee Name: TRINITY BROADCASTING OF NEW YORK, INC. Requested Facility: Ch No:27 N Latitude: 41-43-9; W Longitude: 73-59-47 ERP (Average): 0.5 kW; HAAT: 301 meters; Antenna: ND Facility ID: 62219 Call Sign: WYDC-DT File No: BDSTA-20030326AIJ City: CORNING
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-235515A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-235515A1.txt
  • OF TUCSON 06/12/2003 10563.75000 32-08-07.3 N IN NE 086-09-26.2 W 0001338572 INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORIndianapolis 06/06/2003 05974.85000 39-55-50.9 N IN NE 086-09-26.2 W 0001338572 INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORIndianapolis 06/06/2003 05974.85000 39-55-50.9 N IN NE 086-09-26.2 W 0001338572 INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORIndianapolis 06/06/2003 06034.15000 39-55-50.9 N IN NE 086-09-26.2 W 0001338572 INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORIndianapolis 06/06/2003 06034.15000 39-55-50.9 N IN NE 086-16-00.5 W 0001338576 INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORIndianapolis 06/06/2003 06197.24000 39-55-45.1 N IN NE 086-16-00.5 W 0001338576 INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORIndianapolis 06/06/2003 06226.89000 39-55-45.1 N IN NE 086-16-00.5 W 0001338576 INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORIndianapolis 06/06/2003 06286.19000 39-55-45.1 N IN NE 086-16-00.5 W 0001338576 INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORIndianapolis 06/06/2003 06375.14000 39-55-45.1 N IN NE 086-11-13.8 W 0001338577 INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORIndianapolis 06/06/2003 06197.24000
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-235763A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-235763A1.txt
  • NM NE 103-12-23.8 W 0001350645 El Paso Natural Gas Company Clovis 06/17/2003 00932.34375 34-26-21.2 N NM NE 103-12-23.8 W 0001350645 El Paso Natural Gas Company Clovis 06/17/2003 00941.34375 34-26-21.2 N NC NE P 080-48-36.0 W 0001351881 TOWN OF MOORESVILLE MOORESVILLE 06/17/2003 00956.36875 35-35-06.0 N NC NE P 080-48-36.0 W 0001351881 TOWN OF MOORESVILLE MOORESVILLE 06/17/2003 00956.36875 35-35-06.0 N UT NE 109-25-00.5 W 0001352450 University of Utah Utah Education NetwoDutch John 06/18/2003 06093.45000 40-57-33.8 N UT NE 109-25-00.5 W 0001352450 University of Utah Utah Education NetwoDutch John 06/18/2003 06256.54000 40-57-33.8 N UT NE 109-29-00.4 W 0001352585 University of Utah Utah Education NetwoVernal 06/18/2003 06226.89000 40-44-19.8 N UT NE 109-29-00.4 W 0001352585 University of Utah Utah Education NetwoVernal 06/18/2003 06345.49000 40-44-19.8 N WI
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-236064A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-236064A1.txt
  • ELECTRIC AND POWER COMELIZABETH CITY 06/25/2003 06655.00000 36-17-25.5 N NC AM WED849 076-14-52.7 W 0001329956 VIRGINIA ELECTRIC AND POWER COMELIZABETH CITY 06/24/2003 06655.00000 36-17-25.5 N NC AM WED849 076-14-52.7 W 0001329956 VIRGINIA ELECTRIC AND POWER COMELIZABETH CITY 06/25/2003 06775.00000 36-17-25.5 N NC AM WED849 076-14-52.7 W 0001329956 VIRGINIA ELECTRIC AND POWER COMELIZABETH CITY 06/24/2003 06775.00000 36-17-25.5 N FL AM P 081-47-00.5 W 0001354065 Naples, City of Naples 06/23/2003 00956.44375 26-00-00.3 N CA MD WNEH433 119-36-08.0 W 0001352582 CHEVRON USA INC Derby Acres 06/24/2003 00928.06250 35-16-35.0 N CA MD WNEH433 119-36-08.0 W 0001352582 CHEVRON USA INC Derby Acres 06/24/2003 00928.08750 35-16-35.0 N CA MD WNEH433 119-36-08.0 W 0001352582 CHEVRON USA INC Derby Acres 06/24/2003 00952.06250 35-16-35.0 N Page 13 MG - Microwave
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-236629A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-236629A1.txt
  • 087-05-47.0 W 0001342321 JOE WHEELER ELECTRIC MEMBERSHTRINITY 07/10/2003 00952.83125 34-34-51.3 N ME AM 069-47-26.0 W 0001344199 Maine Public Broadcasting Corporation AUGUSTA 07/10/2003 23235.00000 44-19-01.0 N AZ AM WIA669 111-06-07.3 W 0001346151 EL PASO NATURAL GAS COMPANY TUCSON 07/11/2003 06528.75000 31-58-37.2 N AZ AM WIA669 111-06-07.3 W 0001346151 EL PASO NATURAL GAS COMPANY TUCSON 07/11/2003 06625.00000 31-58-37.2 N FL AM P 081-47-00.5 W 0001354065 Naples, City of Naples 07/10/2003 00956.44375 26-08-00.3 N Page 20 MG - Microwave Industrial/Business Pool State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City WI AM 088-12-03.0 W 0001374944 Onieda Utility Commission Onieda 07/09/2003 00928.49375 44-30-12.0 N WI AM 088-12-03.0 W 0001374944 Onieda Utility Commission Onieda 07/09/2003 00952.49375 44-30-12.0 N
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-238029A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-238029A1.txt
  • 0001416448 AT&T Wireless Services of Florida, Inc. Bloomington 08/13/2003 06605.00000 39-08-47.2 N NE NE 102-51-31.0 W 0001418341 Corban Communications, Inc. Allilance 08/14/2003 06735.00000 42-05-43.0 N CL - Cellular State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City NY MD KNKA297 077-07-55.2 W 0001414628 Bell Atlantic Mobile of Rochester, L.P. CLIFTON SPRINGS 08/12/2003 42-55-00.5 N NY MD KNKA297 077-07-55.2 W 0001414628 Bell Atlantic Mobile of Rochester, L.P. CLIFTON SPRINGS 08/12/2003 42-55-00.5 N NC MD KNKN890 083-01-57.2 W 0001417424 NORTH CAROLINA RSA 1 PARTNERSHWaynesville 08/13/2003 35-32-40.3 N ID MD KNKN306 112-56-33.0 W 0001419175 USCOC OF IDAHO RSA #5, INC. AMERICAN FALLS 08/15/2003 42-46-07.0 N ID MD KNKN306 112-56-33.0 W 0001419175 USCOC OF IDAHO RSA #5,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-238477A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-238477A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-238477A1.txt
  • KNIGHT BROADCASTING OF BATON ROUGE LIC. CORP. Requested Facility: Ch No:34 N Latitude: 30-22-40; W Longitude: 91-5-49 ERP (Average): 1 kW; HAAT: 31 meters; Antenna: ND Facility ID: 8661 Call Sign: WOI-DT File No: BDSTA-20030417ACI City: AMES State: IA Grant Date: 05/13/2003 Licensee Name: CAPITAL COMMUNICATIONS COMPANY, INC. Requested Facility: Ch No:59 N Latitude: 41-48-1; W Longitude: 93-36-27 ERP (Average): 0.5 kW; HAAT: 311 meters; Antenna: DA Facility ID: 37806 Call Sign: WLFB-DT File No: BDSTA-20030418ACE City: BLUEFIELD State: WV Grant Date: 05/20/2003 Licensee Name: LIVING FAITH MINISTRIES, INC. Requested Facility: Ch No:14 N Latitude: 37-13-8; W Longitude: 81-15-39 ERP (Average): 12 kW; HAAT: 428 meters; Antenna: DA Facility ID: 24436 Call Sign: KLTJ-DT File No: BDSTA-20030421ACV City: GALVESTON State: TX
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-238830A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-238830A1.txt
  • N PA NE P 075-16-10.5 W 0001441016 Philadelphia International Airport Philadelphia 09/05/2003 00130.67500 39-52-03.2 N PA NE P 075-16-10.5 W 0001441016 Philadelphia International Airport Philadelphia 09/05/2003 00131.77500 39-52-03.2 N NY RM WXU3 078-56-52.1 W 0001436314 NIAGARA FRONTIER TRANSPORTATIONIAGARA FALLS 09/02/2003 00122.95000 43-06-43.2 N FL RM WWN7 087-14-06.9 W 0001437209 BAPTIST HOSPITAL INC PENSACOLA 09/02/2003 00122.82500 30-25-58.7 N AR RM KNI5 092-17-00.5 W 0001437573 ARKANSAS, STATE OF LITTLE ROCK 09/02/2003 00123.05000 34-44-03.3 N RO WES4 0001436871 GEMCO AVIATION SERVICES INC 09/02/2003 RO WEI7 0001436913 CROSS KEYS AIRPORT INDUSTRIES 09/02/2003 RO KCP9 0001438134 AERONAUTICAL RADIO INC 09/03/2003 RO KCW2 0001438135 AERONAUTICAL RADIO INC 09/03/2003 RO KHB4 0001438136 AERONAUTICAL RADIO INC 09/03/2003 RO KHS9 0001438137 AERONAUTICAL RADIO INC 09/03/2003 RO KIL6 0001438138 AERONAUTICAL RADIO
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-239131A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-239131A1.txt
  • Applicant Name Latitude City NM NE 107-16-19.8 W 0001453289 Teligent, Inc. Truth or Consequen 09/16/2003 19320.00000 33-14-34.5 N NM NE 107-17-30.3 W 0001453361 Teligent, Inc. Truth or Consequen 09/16/2003 17760.00000 33-20-31.8 N CA NE 122-17-30.4 W 0001453926 SOUTHWESTERN BELL MOBILE SYSTECASTELLA 09/17/2003 10551.25000 41-07-37.9 N CA NE 122-17-30.4 W 0001453926 SOUTHWESTERN BELL MOBILE SYSTECASTELLA 09/17/2003 10556.25000 41-07-37.9 N CA NE 118-03-00.5 W 0001453946 Los Angeles SMSA Limited Partnership El Monte 09/17/2003 17885.00000 34-04-25.1 N CA NE 118-05-50.5 W 0001454150 Los Angeles SMSA Limited Partnership Lancaster 09/17/2003 10578.12500 34-41-17.1 N WI NE 088-37-42.9 W 0001454173 United States Cellular Operating CompanyLarsen 09/17/2003 06625.00000 44-13-01.8 N NE NE 098-27-23.0 W 0001454357 N.E. Colorado Wireless Technologies, IncSAINT LIBORY 09/17/2003 06093.45000 41-06-21.0 N NE NE 098-22-21.2
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-239154A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-239154A1.pdf
  • MHz. On that same day, FCC agent David Dombrowski of the Philadelphia Office used direction finding techniques to locate the source of the transmissions on the frequency 105.7 MHz to the Dunwoody Village, 3500 West Chester Pike, Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073. The FCC agent observed that the transmissions from the station could be detected with a standard car radio approximately 0.5 mile from the Dunwoody Village. Nancy Morrison, the Recreation Director, permitted agent Dombrowski to inspect the FM broadcast station. Nancy Morrison explained that the Dunwoody Village subscribes to an FM broadcast service on the frequency 105.7 MHz called ``Companion Radio.'' Networx Corporation installed and operates the FM broadcast station equipment at the Dunwoody Village to provide the service. Radio stations
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-239660A2.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-239660A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-239660A2.txt
  • non-DSL, non-cable modem). As noted in the chart, the OECD reports that there are 1.9 million ``other ``subscribers in the United States. This is based on the FCC's number for June 2002, which includes commercial subscribers. Thus, the 1.9 million figure includes: about 1.2 million traditional wireline services, such as T1 and T3 lines or their symmetric DSL equivalents; about 0.5 million connections over optical fiber to the subscriber's premises; and about 0.2 million satellite and terrestrial fixed wireless connections. Id at table 1. The total is for all OECD countries, including those not included in this chart. Incumbent telco's ownership share of cable operators declined from a high of 59% in 1998 to about 5% in 2003. Broadband Over Cable
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-240202A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-240202A1.txt
  • AL NE 085-08-55.7 W 0001486359 MARK HELLINGER Eufaula 10/16/2003 00947.00000 31-52-44.9 N NV NE 119-47-37.8 W 0001486421 CITADEL BROADCASTING COMPANYReno 10/16/2003 00951.87500 39-30-22.3 N OK NE 097-52-31.2 W 0001486424 CITADEL BROADCASTING COMPANYOkarche 10/16/2003 00948.50000 35-43-38.1 N OK NE 097-35-31.2 W 0001486426 CITADEL BROADCASTING COMPANYOklahoma City 10/17/2003 00950.00000 35-32-20.1 N SC NE 081-07-31.2 W 0001486503 FRANK NEELY ROCK HILL 10/17/2003 00947.62500 34-56-00.5 N NM NE 108-13-28.3 W 0001486850 NATIVE AMERICAN CHRISTIAN VOICE,Farmington 10/17/2003 00949.00000 36-44-02.0 N NM NE 108-13-13.0 W 0001486853 VOICE MINISTRIES OF FARMINGTON, IFARMINGTON 10/17/2003 00947.50000 36-41-44.0 N CF - Common Carrier Fixed Point to Point Microwave State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City CA MD WMI249 121-00-04.0 W 0001480599
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-240203A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-240203A1.txt
  • CO MD WLG213 108-34-05.3 W 0001482602 UNITED MINISTRIES GRAND JUNCTION 10/14/2003 00944.87500 39-04-46.9 N CO MD WLG213 108-34-05.3 W 0001482602 UNITED MINISTRIES GRAND JUNCTION 10/14/2003 00944.87500 39-04-46.9 N CO MD WLG213 108-34-05.3 W 0001482602 UNITED MINISTRIES GRAND JUNCTION 10/14/2003 00945.12500 39-04-46.9 N SC MD WLF384 078-53-22.0 W 0001482605 NM LICENSING, LLC Myrtle Beach 10/14/2003 00946.00000 33-42-21.0 N TX MD WBK258 101-51-00.5 W 0001482625 NM LICENSING, LLC LUBBOCK 10/14/2003 00946.00000 33-32-32.3 N TX MD WBK258 101-51-00.5 W 0001482625 NM LICENSING, LLC LUBBOCK 10/14/2003 00950.12500 33-32-32.3 N NH MD WPNG796 070-50-16.0 W 0001482774 CITADEL BROADCASTING COMPANYDover 10/14/2003 00947.50000 43-10-26.0 N NH MD WMG426 071-07-32.2 W 0001482777 CITADEL BROADCASTING COMPANYNorth Conway 10/14/2003 00944.37500 44-03-05.2 N NH MD WMG426 071-07-32.2 W 0001482777 CITADEL BROADCASTING COMPANYNorth
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-240876A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-240876A1.txt
  • (CPP), Mobile Party Pays (MPP) 25 35 35 50 40 0.6 0.2 0.15 0.2 0.4 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 Little Smart 1 (CPP) Little Smart 2 (CPP) Mobile A: China Mobile/Unicom local plan (MPP) Mobile B: China Mobile national plan (MPP) Mobile 3: Unicom national plan (MPP) Yuan pe r mo nth 0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 Yua n p er m inu te Monthly fee Usage fee per minute The growth of wireless local loop service in China and India is compelling because these markets have sufficient scale to foster technological innovations that meet the particular needs of developing economies. We are aware that other wireless local loop technologies, 16 such as the corDECT
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-241826A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-241826A1.txt
  • DURANGO 11/25/2003 10895.00000 37-16-29.0 N CO MD WCT947 107-46-43.2 W 0001526805 Qwest Corporation SILVERTON 11/25/2003 11015.00000 37-41-45.9 N CO MD WCT947 107-46-43.2 W 0001526805 Qwest Corporation SILVERTON 11/25/2003 11095.00000 37-41-45.9 N CO MD KYO85 107-46-58.2 W 0001526844 Qwest Corporation DURANGO 11/25/2003 11505.00000 37-21-53.0 N CO MD KYO85 107-46-58.2 W 0001526844 Qwest Corporation DURANGO 11/25/2003 11585.00000 37-21-53.0 N LA MD KFA81 093-40-00.5 W 0001526971 BELL ATLANTIC MOBILE SYSTEMS OF STARKS 11/25/2003 05945.20000 30-20-03.7 N LA MD KFA81 093-40-00.5 W 0001526971 BELL ATLANTIC MOBILE SYSTEMS OF STARKS 11/25/2003 05945.20000 30-20-03.7 N LA MD KFA81 093-40-00.5 W 0001526971 BELL ATLANTIC MOBILE SYSTEMS OF STARKS 11/25/2003 05974.85000 30-20-03.7 N Page 10 CF - Common Carrier Fixed Point to Point Microwave State Purpose Call Sign Longitude
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-242039A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-242039A1.txt
  • 12/04/2003 21875.00000 38-52-03.0 N VA NE 077-04-49.0 W 0001534814 Aeros Technologies, LLC ARLINGTON 12/04/2003 21975.00000 38-52-03.0 N AL NE 086-48-41.1 W 0001535434 POWERTEL MUD CREEK 12/04/2003 19430.00000 34-04-30.5 N AL NE 086-49-43.3 W 0001535445 POWERTEL CULLMAN 12/04/2003 17870.00000 34-11-51.2 N AL NE 086-49-43.3 W 0001535445 POWERTEL CULLMAN 12/04/2003 17950.00000 34-11-51.2 N AL NE 086-52-34.1 W 0001535453 POWERTEL CULLMAN 12/04/2003 19510.00000 34-12-00.5 N TX NE 100-27-07.0 W 0001535491 CORPUS CHRISTI SMSA LIMITED PARTSAN ANGELO 12/04/2003 06286.19000 31-28-11.0 N CA NE 117-37-57.9 W 0001535775 Los Angeles SMSA Limited Partnership Upland 12/05/2003 19605.00000 34-06-21.6 N CA NE 117-23-50.4 W 0001535824 Los Angeles SMSA Limited Partnership Bloomington 12/05/2003 19525.00000 34-03-16.9 N MN NE 093-09-15.7 W 0001536113 ST. OLAF COLLEGE (TELECOMMUNICANORTHFIELD 12/05/2003 11215.00000 44-27-44.8 N MN
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-242039A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-242039A1.txt
  • IF-20031031AAR NEW NEW (310144) WHTV BROADCASTING CORPORATION CAMPECHE CAROLI, PR AG BG CG DG NEW ITFS LOW POWER SIGNAL BOOSTER STN LAT N 18 22 3.6/ LONG W 66 58 16.5 MAIN STATION CALL SIGN: WLX321 IF-20031031AAS NEW NEW (310145) WHTV BROADCASTING CORPORATION BAYAMON, PR AG BG CG DG NEW ITFS LOW POWER SIGNAL BOOSTER STN LAT N 18 23 0.5/ LONG W 66 12 16.4 MAIN STATION CALL SIGN: WLX321 IF-20031031AAT NEW NEW (310146) WHTV BROADCASTING CORPORATION BAYAMON, PR AG BG CG DG NEW ITFS LOW POWER SIGNAL BOOSTER STN LAT N 18 21 12.9/ LONG W 66 56 7.5 MAIN STATION CALL SIGN: WLX321 IF-20031031AAU NEW NEW (310147) WHTV BROADCASTING CORPORATION TOA BAJA, PR AG BG CG DG NEW
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-243069A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-243069A1.txt
  • MD WLV506 090-30-29.4 W 0001575624 Cellco Partnership HOUSE SPRINGS 01/12/2004 06565.00000 38-23-18.1 N MO MD WLV506 090-30-29.4 W 0001575624 Cellco Partnership HOUSE SPRINGS 01/12/2004 06835.00000 38-23-18.1 N MO MD WPYU902 092-47-12.5 W 0001575636 USCOC OF GREATER MISSOURI, LLCTIPTON 01/12/2004 06585.00000 38-39-05.4 N MO MD WPYU902 092-47-12.5 W 0001575636 USCOC OF GREATER MISSOURI, LLCTIPTON 01/12/2004 06595.00000 38-39-05.4 N MO MD WLV514 091-11-00.5 W 0001575698 Cellco Partnership WARRENTON 01/12/2004 05945.20000 38-49-23.1 N Page 9 CF - Common Carrier Fixed Point to Point Microwave State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City MO MD WLV514 091-11-00.5 W 0001575698 Cellco Partnership WARRENTON 01/12/2004 06004.50000 38-49-23.1 N MO MD WLV514 091-11-00.5 W 0001575698 Cellco Partnership WARRENTON 01/12/2004
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-243416A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-243416A1.txt
  • 3 3 3 Frequency GHz 12.45 12.45 12.45 12.45 Required Operating Threshold dB 5 6.1 5 6.1 Rx Noise Bandwidth MHz 24 24 24 24 Average Satellite EIRP dBW 51 51 51 51 Satellite Range km 37501.84 37501.84 37501.84 3750 1.84 Free Space Path Loss dB 205.8 205.8 205.8 205.8 Atmospheric Attenuation dB 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 Rain Attenuation dB 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 Pointing Loss dB 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 45 cm G/T 30 cm G/T dBlK 14.5 14.5 14.5 dB/K 8.5 8.5 8.5 14.5 8.5 Carrier-to-Thermal Noise Ratio 45cm dB 13.39 13.39 13.39 13.39 Carrier-to-Thermal Noise Ratio 30cm dB 7.39 7.39 7.39 7.39 C/I Other DBS 45cm dB 20.7 20 25.84 25.84 C/I Other DBS 30 cm dB 20.7
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-243654A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-243654A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-243654A1.txt
  • 2001 to about 173 reports per thousand lines in 2002. In 2002, the level of customer dissatisfaction with residential repairs declined for all but one reporting holding company, and the level of customer dissatisfaction with residential installations declined for two out of the four reporting holding companies. Average residential installation intervals for individual operating entities ranged from a low of 0.5 business days to a high of 2.1 business days in 2002, as compared to a low of 0.6 business days and a high of 3.2 business days in 2001. The report is available for reference in the FCC's Reference Information Center, Courtyard Level, 445 12th Street, S.W. Copies may be purchased by calling Qualex International at (202) 863-2893. The report
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-243941A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-243941A1.txt
  • station-keeping accuracy of 0.1' The current practice of commercial satellite operators is to operate their satellites within a station-keeping box of +0.05". Assuming the worst-case scenario in which a new entrant's satellite drifts towards the edge of the station-keeping box of an incumbent's existing satellite (or vice versa), the total worst-case station- keeping accuracy is 0.1 '. b) Mis-pointing of 0.5' for the receiving earth stations The value of 0.5" for mis-pointing errors, as proposed by the two largest DBS providers in the United States, DirecTV' and EchoStar,6 has been considered in this study for the calculation of the minimum off-axis angle towards the interfering satellite. c) Receiving antenna size of 0.45 m and its off-axis gain envelope In considering the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-243985A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-243985A1.txt
  • 0001609846 New Jersey State Police Montclair 02/09/2004 11215.00000 40-51-53.0 N NJ MD WNEL591 074-13-43.5 W 0001609847 NEW JERSEY, STATE OF TOTOWA 02/09/2004 10715.00000 40-53-56.3 N NJ MD WNEX376 074-41-54.0 W 0001609848 NEW JERSEY, STATE OF ROXBURY TOWNS 02/09/2004 06545.62500 40-53-14.0 N NJ MD WNEX376 074-41-54.0 W 0001609848 NEW JERSEY, STATE OF ROXBURY TOWNS 02/09/2004 06605.00000 40-53-14.0 N NJ MD WNTL813 074-15-00.5 W 0001609849 NEW JERSEY, STATE OF RINGWOOD 02/09/2004 06585.00000 41-04-01.3 N NJ MD WNTL813 074-15-00.5 W 0001609849 NEW JERSEY, STATE OF RINGWOOD 02/09/2004 06670.62500 41-04-01.3 N NJ MD WNEL594 074-36-46.5 W 0001609850 NEW JERSEY, STATE OF PLAINSBORO TOW 02/09/2004 06845.00000 40-21-11.3 N TX MD WED400 096-46-32.0 W 0001613792 DALLAS, CITY OF DALLAS 02/11/2004 06197.24000 32-46-56.0 N TX MD WED400 096-46-32.0
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-244558A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-244558A1.txt
  • 0001626968 GAS TRANSMISSION NORTHWEST COSpokane 02/23/2004 22802.50000 47-36-03.6 N WA MD WPYW387 117-17-55.0 W 0001626986 GAS TRANSMISSION NORTHWEST COSpokane 02/23/2004 21602.50000 47-34-37.0 N Page 20 MG - Microwave Industrial/Business Pool State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City HI MD KTS97 157-47-40.1 W 0001627215 HAWAIIAN ELECTRIC COMPANY INC Kaneohe 02/23/2004 02141.20000 21-23-00.5 N HI MD KTS97 157-47-40.1 W 0001627215 HAWAIIAN ELECTRIC COMPANY INC Kaneohe 02/23/2004 06865.00000 21-23-00.5 N IN MD KYP37 086-54-14.0 W 0001627344 HOOSIER ENERGY REC INC LAMAR 02/23/2004 06412.82000 38-02-39.0 N IN MD KYP37 086-54-14.0 W 0001627344 HOOSIER ENERGY REC INC LAMAR 02/23/2004 06745.00000 38-02-39.0 N IN MD KYP37 086-54-14.0 W 0001627344 HOOSIER ENERGY REC INC LAMAR 02/23/2004 06765.00000 38-02-39.0
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-244756A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-244756A1.txt
  • ELECTRIC AND POWER COMBROOKNEAL 03/04/2004 06565.00000 37-05-20.5 N Page 23 MG - Microwave Industrial/Business Pool State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City VA MD WNER298 077-39-45.9 W 0001642193 VIRGINIA ELECTRIC AND POWER COMMIDDLEBURG 03/04/2004 02144.40000 38-55-35.4 N VA MD WNEW787 076-32-35.8 W 0001642253 VIRGINIA ELECTRIC AND POWER COMGLOUCESTER 03/04/2004 06775.00000 37-25-00.5 N VA MD WNEW787 076-32-35.8 W 0001642253 VIRGINIA ELECTRIC AND POWER COMGLOUCESTER 03/04/2004 06825.00000 37-25-00.5 N VA MD WQH56 076-27-38.0 W 0001642288 VIRGINIA ELECTRIC AND POWER COMYORKTOWN 03/04/2004 06585.00000 37-12-53.0 N VA MD WQH56 076-27-38.0 W 0001642288 VIRGINIA ELECTRIC AND POWER COMYORKTOWN 03/04/2004 06615.00000 37-12-53.0 N VA MD WQH56 076-27-38.0 W 0001642288 VIRGINIA ELECTRIC AND POWER COMYORKTOWN 03/04/2004 06635.00000 37-12-53.0
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-245058A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-245058A1.txt
  • W 20021011AAANTELOS LICENSES, INC. CHARLOTTESVILLE 10/11/2002 02620.00000 - 02626.00000 37-58-57.0 N VA NE 078-28-58.0 W 20021011AAANTELOS LICENSES, INC. CHARLOTTESVILLE 10/11/2002 02632.00000 - 02638.00000 37-58-57.0 N MG - Microwave Industrial/Business Pool State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City TX AM 106-17-58.0 W 0001161642 EPSON EL PASO INC. EL PASO 03/10/2004 21234.50000 31-43-00.5 N CA AM WNER992 121-18-00.8 W 0001475404 South Feather Water and Power AgencyFORBESTOWN 03/12/2004 02184.80000 39-31-24.5 N CA AM WNER992 121-18-00.8 W 0001475404 South Feather Water and Power AgencyFORBESTOWN 03/12/2004 02186.40000 39-31-24.5 N CA AM WNER992 121-18-00.8 W 0001475404 South Feather Water and Power AgencyFORBESTOWN 03/12/2004 02191.20000 39-31-24.5 N Page 22 MG - Microwave Industrial/Business Pool State Purpose Call Sign
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-245582A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-245582A1.txt
  • N AZ MD WPQL578 112-04-11.5 W 0001668368 WINSTAR SPECTRUM, LLC Phoenix 03/23/2004 11075.00000 33-27-33.2 N AZ MD WPQL578 112-04-11.5 W 0001668368 WINSTAR SPECTRUM, LLC Phoenix 03/23/2004 17840.00000 33-27-33.2 N AZ MD WPQL578 112-04-11.5 W 0001668368 WINSTAR SPECTRUM, LLC Phoenix 03/23/2004 17920.00000 33-27-33.2 N AZ MD WPQL578 112-04-11.5 W 0001668368 WINSTAR SPECTRUM, LLC Phoenix 03/23/2004 18120.00000 33-27-33.2 N PR MD WPSL955 066-04-00.5 W 0001668745 SprintCom, Inc. (Puerto Rico) RIO PIEDRAS 03/23/2004 17885.00000 18-22-09.5 N PR MD WPOT475 066-04-17.5 W 0001668816 Centennial Puerto Rico License Corp. RIO PIEDRAS 03/23/2004 19310.00000 18-24-24.8 N PR MD WPOT476 066-04-27.5 W 0001668900 Centennial Puerto Rico License Corp. HATO REY 03/23/2004 17750.00000 18-25-20.8 N UT MD WLL408 111-54-00.8 W 0001668901 BONNEVILLE INTERNATIONAL CORPOSALT LAKE CITY 03/23/2004 10895.00000 40-46-12.8
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-246891A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-246891A1.txt
  • MI AM P 083-22-01.8 W 0001550143 Campbell, Gary PONTIAC 04/30/2004 00469.93750 42-44-32.1 N ID NE X 0001713386 Davis Communications Cottonwood 04/26/2004 00466.38750 ID NE X 0001713386 Davis Communications Cottonwood 04/26/2004 00466.76250 ID NE X 0001713386 Davis Communications Cottonwood 04/26/2004 00467.01250 ID NE X 0001713386 Davis Communications Cottonwood 04/26/2004 00467.45000 ID NE X 0001713386 Davis Communications Cottonwood 04/26/2004 00468.26250 ID NE 116-28-00.5 W 0001713386 Davis Communications Cottonwood 04/26/2004 00461.38750 46-03-32.6 N ID NE 116-28-00.5 W 0001713386 Davis Communications Cottonwood 04/26/2004 00461.76250 46-03-32.6 N ID NE 116-28-00.5 W 0001713386 Davis Communications Cottonwood 04/26/2004 00462.01250 46-03-32.6 N ID NE 116-28-00.5 W 0001713386 Davis Communications Cottonwood 04/26/2004 00462.45000 46-03-32.6 N ID NE 116-28-00.5 W 0001713386 Davis Communications Cottonwood 04/26/2004 00463.26250 46-03-32.6 N Page 40 YK
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-247090A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-247090A1.txt
  • 33-30-39.3 N AZ NE 112-10-17.1 W 0001723265 Salt River Project Agricultural Improvement & Power District (dba SRP) Phoenix 05/04/2004 00928.50625 33-35-50.5 N AZ NE 112-10-17.1 W 0001723265 Salt River Project Agricultural Improvement & Power District (dba SRP) Phoenix 05/04/2004 00952.50625 33-35-50.5 N AZ NE 111-50-33.5 W 0001723330 Salt River Project Agricultural Improvement & Power District (dba SRP) Chandler 05/04/2004 00928.61875 33-15-00.5 N AZ NE 111-50-33.5 W 0001723330 Salt River Project Agricultural Improvement & Power District (dba SRP) Chandler 05/04/2004 00952.61875 33-15-00.5 N AK NE 152-10-09.1 W 0001723369 COOK INLET PIPE LINE COMPANY KUSTATAN 05/04/2004 00928.41875 60-35-47.9 N AK NE 152-10-09.1 W 0001723369 COOK INLET PIPE LINE COMPANY KUSTATAN 05/04/2004 00952.41875 60-35-47.9 N PA NE P 078-12-10.8 W 0001723710 Willamsburg Borough Williamsburg
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-247368A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-247368A1.txt
  • Cellco Partnership WILLIAMSBURG 05/10/2004 06286.19000 37-16-06.0 N VA NE 076-53-48.0 W 0001730928 Cellco Partnership WILLIAMSBURG 05/10/2004 06315.84000 37-16-06.0 N PR NE 066-08-01.3 W 0001730937 SprintCom, Inc. (Puerto Rico) San Juan 05/10/2004 17925.00000 18-23-50.3 N CA NE 122-20-28.8 W 0001731135 PACIFIC BELL BURLINGAME 05/10/2004 10855.00000 37-27-20.9 N CA NE 122-20-28.8 W 0001731135 PACIFIC BELL BURLINGAME 05/10/2004 11015.00000 37-27-20.9 N CA NE 122-21-00.5 W 0001731136 PACIFIC BELL BURLINGAME 05/10/2004 11505.00000 37-34-36.3 N CA NE 122-29-57.9 W 0001731137 PACIFIC BELL EL GRANADA 05/10/2004 11345.00000 37-29-53.7 N PR NE 066-10-24.8 W 0001731242 SprintCom, Inc. (Puerto Rico) Levitown 05/10/2004 19485.00000 18-26-48.6 N PR NE 066-16-25.6 W 0001731294 SprintCom, Inc. (Puerto Rico) DORADO 05/10/2004 18065.00000 18-28-38.8 N PR NE 066-19-13.0 W 0001731971 SprintCom, Inc. (Puerto Rico) DORADO
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-247892A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-247892A1.txt
  • Bridgeport 05/26/2004 00944.50000 43-09-24.0 N OH NE 084-10-11.0 W 0001750980 UNIVERSITY OF DAYTON DAYTON 05/27/2004 00947.50000 39-44-09.0 N AR NE 094-25-02.0 W 0001753521 CAPSTAR TX LIMITED PARTNERSHIPFORT SMITH 05/28/2004 00945.00000 35-22-52.3 N TX NE 094-07-57.0 W 0001754104 CLEAR CHANNEL BROADCASTING LICBEAUMONT 05/28/2004 00950.00000 30-05-42.0 N IN NE 086-06-47.9 W 0001754211 MIAMI COUNTY BROADCASTING, INC.KOKOMO 05/28/2004 00949.00000 40-24-56.9 N MT NE 111-52-00.5 W 0001754622 CAPSTAR TX LIMITED PARTNERSHIPSHELBY 05/28/2004 00946.00000 48-30-13.9 N CD - Paging and Radiotelephone State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City TX MD KLF477 098-38-46.2 W 0001747957 MOBILE PHONE OF TEXAS, INC. GRAHAM 05/25/2004 00152.06000 33-05-55.4 N TX MD KLF477 098-38-46.2 W 0001747957 MOBILE PHONE OF TEXAS, INC. GRAHAM
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-248445A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-248445A1.txt
  • Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City EX WDU302H01 20020319ADENucentrix Spectrum Resources, Inc. (Debt 03/19/2002 NT WNTL898H01 0001767938 Puvalowski, Dennis A 06/07/2004 MG - Microwave Industrial/Business Pool State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City HI AM KTS97 157-47-40.1 W 0001627215 HAWAIIAN ELECTRIC COMPANY INC Kaneohe 06/10/2004 02141.20000 21-23-00.5 N HI AM KTS97 157-47-40.1 W 0001627215 HAWAIIAN ELECTRIC COMPANY INC Kaneohe 06/10/2004 06865.00000 21-23-00.5 N AZ AM WQAI842 109-51-10.1 W 0001630833 The Burlington Northern and Santa Fe RaHolbrook 06/08/2004 06256.54000 35-00-52.0 N AZ AM WQAI842 109-51-10.1 W 0001630833 The Burlington Northern and Santa Fe RaHolbrook 06/08/2004 06315.84000 35-00-52.0 N MA AM 071-06-09.9 W 0001650097 President & Fellows of Harvard
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-248658A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-248658A1.txt
  • LICENSING, LLC Erie 06/16/2004 00946.00000 42-07-40.0 N KS MD WLF294 097-35-35.9 W 0001778715 B-B BROADCASTING, INC. SALINA 06/18/2004 00945.87500 38-48-41.0 N KS MD WLF294 097-35-35.9 W 0001778715 B-B BROADCASTING, INC. SALINA 06/18/2004 00946.12500 38-48-41.0 N NY NE 073-52-54.0 W 0001770257 DOT COMMUNICATIONS, INC. Schenectady 06/14/2004 00947.50000 42-43-54.0 N VA NE 080-00-57.1 W 0001770786 CAPSTAR TX LIMITED PARTNERSHIPBOONES HILL 06/14/2004 00944.25000 37-07-00.5 N VA NE 080-00-44.7 W 0001770789 CAPSTAR TX LIMITED PARTNERSHIPROANOKE 06/14/2004 00951.00000 37-15-52.7 N SC NE 081-07-47.6 W 0001772630 VOORHEES COLLEGE Denmark 06/14/2004 00944.15000 33-18-25.8 N TN NE 086-47-39.9 W 0001773011 CAPSTAR TX LIMITED PARTNERSHIPNASHVILLE 06/15/2004 00946.50000 36-08-52.0 N KY NE 087-30-44.0 W 0001774215 HOP BROADCASTING, INC. HOPKINSVILLE 06/16/2004 00945.00000 36-52-54.0 N PA NE 080-04-04.0 W 0001774859 NM LICENSING, LLC
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-249262A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-249262A1.txt
  • 33.2 35.5 6.5 Philippines 23.2 37.0 42.9 42.3 50.2 33.4 50.8 38.9 57.3 73.3 104.3 22.8 Poland 25.0 28.7 34.0 31.5 27.1 27.3 27.8 24.9 24.2 13.3 20.0 -10.3 Russia 8.0 31.6 30.2 26.6 31.0 29.8 22.0 17.4 27.6 54.9 24.1 6.3 Saudi Arabia 30.0 29.8 28.2 24.1 27.2 31.8 36.9 32.0 24.0 35.7 30.3 n.m. Sierra Leone 0.1 0.4 0.5 0.5 1.0 1.2 1.2 0.6 1.2 1.1 1.9 8.0 Singapore 34.2 37.7 43.5 51.1 53.5 61.4 65.8 26.4 72.7 73.5 65.0 4.8 South Africa 18.8 20.8 24.3 26.7 29.3 31.1 36.5 38.9 39.0 28.1 36.7 0.1 Spain 53.1 45.4 51.8 46.1 61.5 85.3 76.0 85.1 112.0 108.3 144.4 12.0 Switzerland 66.1 66.1 73.0 77.3 91.9 98.0 102.1 81.7 118.1 98.0
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-249632A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-249632A1.txt
  • 088-09-11.0 W 0001797933 RACINE CELLULAR TELEPHONE COMPANY DOVER 07/07/2004 05945.20000 42-44-53.0 N WI MD WML773 088-09-11.0 W 0001797933 RACINE CELLULAR TELEPHONE COMPANY DOVER 07/07/2004 05974.85000 42-44-53.0 N WI MD WML773 088-09-11.0 W 0001797933 RACINE CELLULAR TELEPHONE COMPANY DOVER 07/07/2004 06004.50000 42-44-53.0 N WI MD WML773 088-09-11.0 W 0001797933 RACINE CELLULAR TELEPHONE COMPANY DOVER 07/07/2004 06605.00000 42-44-53.0 N AZ MD WMR827 112-07-00.5 W 0001798034 Verizon Wireless (VAW) LLC COTTONWOOD 07/07/2004 05945.20000 34-42-06.0 N AZ MD WMR827 112-07-00.5 W 0001798034 Verizon Wireless (VAW) LLC COTTONWOOD 07/07/2004 06123.10000 34-42-06.0 N AZ MD WMR827 112-07-00.5 W 0001798034 Verizon Wireless (VAW) LLC COTTONWOOD 07/07/2004 10628.75000 34-42-06.0 N AZ MD WMR827 112-07-00.5 W 0001798034 Verizon Wireless (VAW) LLC COTTONWOOD 07/07/2004 10795.00000 34-42-06.0 N UT MD WPZL400 111-51-57.8
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-249855A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-249855A1.txt
  • 075-09-11.7 W 0001805962 THE ST. LAWRENCE UNIVERSITY Canton 07/13/2004 00945.00000 44-35-45.2 N NY NE 074-07-42.6 W 0001805963 THE ST. LAWRENCE UNIVERSITY Saranac Lake 07/13/2004 00949.00000 44-20-27.2 N NY NE 074-24-00.6 W 0001805964 THE ST. LAWRENCE UNIVERSITY Blue Mountain Lake 07/13/2004 00949.50000 43-52-18.2 N NY NE 074-28-32.6 W 0001805965 THE ST. LAWRENCE UNIVERSITY Tupper Lake 07/13/2004 00944.25000 44-09-35.2 N MT NE 111-52-00.5 W 0001808971 CAPSTAR TX LIMITED PARTNERSHIPShelby 07/15/2004 00946.00000 48-30-13.9 N IL NE 087-52-30.0 W 0001809072 MILNER BROADCASTING COMPANY BOURBONNAIS 07/15/2004 00944.50000 41-09-39.0 N RO WHN322 0001803428 TUNED IN BROADCASTING INC 07/12/2004 Page 5 AS - Aural Studio Transmitter Link State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City RO WEF75 0001803797 CRYSTAL
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-250187A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-250187A1.txt
  • File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City VT NE 073-09-48.5 W 0001815299 FBO AV Center BTV Burlington 07/21/2004 00122.95000 44-28-27.5 N TX NE 096-50-00.2 W 0001815821 FirstAIR Group Inc Addison 07/22/2004 00121.50000 32-58-00.1 N TX NE 096-50-00.2 W 0001815821 FirstAIR Group Inc Addison 07/22/2004 00122.95000 32-58-00.1 N NY NE 075-58-00.8 W 0001815892 FirstAIR Group Inc Johnson City 07/22/2004 00121.50000 42-12-00.5 N NY NE 075-58-00.8 W 0001815892 FirstAIR Group Inc Johnson City 07/22/2004 00122.95000 42-12-00.5 N OR NE 123-52-46.5 W 0001817433 Port of Astoria Warrenton 07/23/2004 00122.80000 46-09-30.4 N RO KHQ2 0001811645 PLAINS EXPLORATION & PRODUCTION 07/19/2004 RO KMV5 0001812559 GULFSTREAM AEROSPACE CORPORA 07/20/2004 RO KJH5 0001816436 BIGHORN AIRWAYS INC 07/19/2004 RO KMT2 0001817515 SUWANNEE COUNTY BOARD OF COMM 07/23/2004 RO
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-250521A4.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-250521A4.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-250521A4.txt
  • ‚ìøFè,>�/Å ¿âòç·Ã÷ *Å-,8üàßÖñUàÜ÷ç�[pÿ: ø<|`` endstream endobj 1147 0 obj<>stream Ž´ ä¡,5âÿ(-6ø@&•È° ¿ß }} endstream endobj 1148 0 obj<>stream Õsç›3·ñüJ4âEŠ(R)x5£Ã¡ò!² >Rðî(c)` ì¬dN\ ãÔ.o8F endstream endobj 1149 0 obj<>stream lQ.nš?Í�§4Ví�r T›Êx„ <ÙY ã Ym~¿ endstream endobj 1150 0 obj<> endobj 1151 0 obj<0.5/BM/Normal/AIS false>> endobj 1152 0 obj<
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-250835A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-250835A1.txt
    • 0001830557 CAPSTAR TX LIMITED PARTNERSHIP SAVANNAH 08/05/2004 00951.00000 32-05-23.7 N SD MD WLQ229 096-43-35.0 W 0001830720 MIDCONTINENT RADIO OF S.D., INC. SIOUX FALLS 08/05/2004 00944.50000 43-32-32.0 N TX MD WLG383 098-58-07.0 W 0001831298 LIVING WORD CHURCH OF BROWNWOOD, INC. BROWNWOOD 08/05/2004 00950.50000 31-43-41.2 N WV MD WLE689 080-33-39.0 W 0001832161 PRIORITY COMMUNICATIONS OHIO, LLCWEIRTON 08/06/2004 00950.00000 40-25-11.0 N IL NE 088-14-00.5 W 0001830563 WBCP, INC. Champaign 08/05/2004 00946.15000 40-07-27.5 N NY NE 075-10-39.0 W 0001830656 CAPSTAR TX LIMITED PARTNERSHIP UTICA 08/05/2004 00945.00000 43-08-46.0 N Page 5 AS - Aural Studio Transmitter Link State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City TX NE 097-43-46.5 W 0001830668 UNIVISION RADIO LICENSE CORPORATION AUSTIN 08/05/2004 00947.00000
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-251059A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-251059A1.txt
    • (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City OH MD WCD924 081-25-48.5 W 0001839325 CITICASTERS LICENSES, L.P. Canton 08/12/2004 00951.50000 40-53-36.1 N NY NE 074-54-53.3 W 0001835749 CAPSTAR TX LIMITED PARTNERSHIPMohawk 08/10/2004 00951.00000 42-59-31.6 N AL NE 088-19-00.0 W 0001835966 AMERICAN FAMILY ASSOCIATION Mobile 08/10/2004 00945.00000 30-39-29.0 N OH NE 080-37-58.3 W 0001836870 CITICASTERS LICENSES, L.P. Youngstown 08/11/2004 00946.00000 41-01-12.2 N NY NE 075-14-00.5 W 0001838007 CLEAR CHANNEL BROADCASTING LICUTICA 08/11/2004 00947.50000 43-05-59.2 N CA NE 119-15-12.0 W 0001838855 ESTATE OF LINDA WARE, CYNTHIA RAVisalia 08/12/2004 00945.50000 36-19-00.0 N KY NE 085-41-04.0 W 0001838880 CLEAR CHANNEL BROADCASTING LICLOUISVILLE 08/12/2004 00950.00000 38-11-45.0 N CD - Paging and Radiotelephone State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-251940A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-251940A1.txt
    • and Radio (BSS Direct to the (BSS Direct to the American Consumer) American Consumer) 8 U.S. DBS and DARS Subscriber Growth U.S. DBS and DARS Subscriber Growth Subscribers in millions, 1999 Subscribers in millions, 1999--2004 2004 10.08 12.99 16.07 18.24 20.36 0.14 0.80 2.58 0.00 5.00 10.00 15.00 20.00 25.00 99 00 01 02 03 04 DBS Subscribers (millions) 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 DARS Subscribers (millions) DBS Subscribers DARS Subscribers Source: Company News Releases; FCC Source: Company News Releases; FCC 2004 Video Competition Report 2004 Video Competition Report 9 Mobile Satellite Services Mobile Satellite Services (MSS) (MSS) 10 Mobile Satellite Phone Use is Growing Mobile Satellite Phone Use is Growing Global Mobile Satellite Service Subscribers (Voice) Source: TelAstra,
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-252160A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-252160A1.txt
    • W 0001832112 AT&T Wireless Services of Florida, Inc. ELOY 09/07/2004 10755.00000 32-38-23.0 N AZ AM WPVL458 111-21-47.0 W 0001832112 AT&T Wireless Services of Florida, Inc. ELOY 09/07/2004 10835.00000 32-38-23.0 N AZ AM WPVL458 111-21-47.0 W 0001832112 AT&T Wireless Services of Florida, Inc. ELOY 09/07/2004 10915.00000 32-38-23.0 N OR AM WCT964 120-12-51.1 W 0001866326 CENTURYTEL OF EASTERN OREGON INCFOSSIL 09/10/2004 02112.00000 45-00-00.5 N Page 8 CF - Common Carrier Fixed Point to Point Microwave State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City OR AM WCT964 120-12-51.1 W 0001866326 CENTURYTEL OF EASTERN OREGON INCFOSSIL 09/10/2004 02122.40000 45-00-00.5 N OR AM WCT964 120-12-51.1 W 0001866326 CENTURYTEL OF EASTERN OREGON INCFOSSIL 09/10/2004 05945.20000 45-00-00.5 N OR
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-253344A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-253344A1.txt
    • 10/14/2004 06735.00000 40-03-25.0 N Page 32 MG - Microwave Industrial/Business Pool State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City WV AM 080-42-56.0 W 0001900265 American Electric Power Service CorporatBethlehem 10/14/2004 06765.00000 40-03-25.0 N WV MD WEG316 079-15-46.1 W 0001897086 VIRGINIA ELECTRIC AND POWER COMBISMARK 10/12/2004 10617.50000 39-12-07.4 N UT MD WPYH839 109-25-00.5 W 0001897269 University of Utah Utah Education NetworDutch John 10/12/2004 06256.54000 40-57-33.8 N UT MD WPYA289 109-43-31.5 W 0001897405 University of Utah, Utah Education NetworManila 10/12/2004 06004.50000 40-59-24.8 N NJ MD WNTE214 074-20-34.5 W 0001898048 PSEG Services Corporation EDISON 10/12/2004 06034.15000 40-31-51.3 N NJ MD WAW932 074-10-07.5 W 0001898052 PSEG Services Corporation NEWARK 10/12/2004 06286.19000 40-44-14.3 N ID MD WNTB737
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-253937A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-253937A1.txt
    • OF PRESCOTT 10/25/2004 06553.75000 44-46-44.8 N NY MD WNTY495 073-59-12.2 W 0001915125 New York, City of (Police Department) BROOKLYN 10/27/2004 06775.00000 40-41-35.8 N NY MD WNTZ388 074-00-06.8 W 0001915186 New York, City of (Police Department) NEW YORK 10/27/2004 06615.00000 40-42-44.2 N CA MD WPXT495 115-33-51.6 W 0001915532 San Diego, County of El Centro 10/27/2004 06635.00000 32-44-54.8 N AZ MD KOK44 112-04-00.5 W 0001916463 ARIZONA, STATE OF PHOENIX 10/28/2004 06226.89000 33-19-57.1 N VA NE 078-01-29.9 W 0001911464 Warren County, VA LINDEN 10/25/2004 00942.37500 38-57-19.1 N VA NE 078-19-11.4 W 0001911465 Warren County, VA BENTONVILLE 10/25/2004 00943.17500 38-50-07.5 N Page 20 MW - Microwave Public Safety Pool State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-254343A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-254343A1.txt
    • Name Latitude City CO NE P 104-36-56.0 W 0001926553 Cottonwood Water & Sant Parker 11/08/2004 00956.28125 39-18-01.0 N NM NE 103-08-19.7 W 0001927146 TEPPCO CRUDE PIPELINE, L.P. Hobbs 11/08/2004 02199.20000 32-39-07.4 N MD NE 076-10-36.8 W 0001927719 Bay Broadband Communications, LLC. Chestertown 11/08/2004 06345.49000 39-12-38.3 N CA NE P 122-28-51.6 W 0001927737 North Coast County Water District Pacifica 11/08/2004 00952.39375 37-37-00.5 N UT NE P 109-59-52.8 W 0001927748 Roosevelt City Corp Roosevelt 11/08/2004 00956.38125 40-17-52.8 N AZ NE P 112-09-39.6 W 0001928536 City of Williams Williams 11/09/2004 00956.41875 35-17-28.0 N TX NE 098-05-02.4 W 0001929914 COPANO PROCESSING, LP ALICE 11/10/2004 00928.05625 27-49-24.1 N TX NE 098-05-02.4 W 0001929914 COPANO PROCESSING, LP ALICE 11/10/2004 00952.05625 27-49-24.1 N WI NE 090-08-13.0 W 0001930264
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-255109A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-255109A1.txt
    • Resources Vernal 11/29/2004 00928.49375 40-21-19.8 N UT NE 109-08-46.4 W 0001951830 Questar Market Resources Vernal 11/29/2004 00928.56875 40-21-19.8 N UT NE 109-08-46.4 W 0001951830 Questar Market Resources Vernal 11/29/2004 00952.49375 40-21-19.8 N UT NE 109-08-46.4 W 0001951830 Questar Market Resources Vernal 11/29/2004 00952.56875 40-21-19.8 N TX NE 100-55-42.3 W 0001952401 INTIER AUTOMOTIVE DEL RIO 11/29/2004 21234.50000 29-21-28.8 N CO NE 104-53-00.5 W 0001953659 Duke Energy Field Services LP Ft Lupton 11/30/2004 00928.78125 40-05-19.4 N CO NE 104-53-00.5 W 0001953659 Duke Energy Field Services LP Ft Lupton 11/30/2004 00952.78125 40-05-19.4 N CA NE 116-28-52.1 W 0001955146 PALM SPRINGS UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTCATHEDERAL CITY 12/01/2004 22275.00000 33-51-08.5 N DE NE 075-41-00.8 W 0001955197 Delaware Park Wilmington 12/01/2004 23125.00000 39-42-31.9 N DE NE 075-39-42.2 W
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-255326A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-255326A1.txt
    • 0001963845 SOUTHWESTERN BELL MOBILE SYSTEBIG BEAR 12/07/2004 06063.80000 34-14-05.0 N WI NE 088-42-04.0 W 0001964218 UNITED STATES CELLULAR OPERATINJUNEAU 12/08/2004 06635.00000 43-24-34.0 N CA NE 118-35-50.9 W 0001964281 SOUTHWESTERN BELL MOBILE SYSTECHATSWORTH 12/08/2004 17950.00000 34-19-41.3 N CA NE 118-35-50.9 W 0001964281 SOUTHWESTERN BELL MOBILE SYSTECHATSWORTH 12/08/2004 18110.00000 34-19-41.3 N CA NE 118-36-20.7 W 0001964338 SOUTHWESTERN BELL MOBILE SYSTECHATSWORTH 12/08/2004 19670.00000 34-16-00.5 N CA NE 118-26-02.0 W 0001964375 SOUTHWESTERN BELL MOBILE SYSTEARLETA 12/08/2004 19510.00000 34-14-19.8 N NY NE 074-00-21.8 W 0001964663 AT&T CORP. NEW YORK 12/08/2004 19480.00000 40-42-33.7 N CA NE 117-46-41.8 W 0001964779 SOUTHWESTERN BELL MOBILE SYSTEIRVINE 12/08/2004 19615.00000 33-40-46.5 N CA NE 117-50-18.3 W 0001964799 SOUTHWESTERN BELL MOBILE SYSTEIRVINE 12/08/2004 19695.00000 33-37-53.9 N CA NE 116-57-40.4 W 0001964867 Verizon Wireless
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-255577A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-255577A1.txt
    • Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City TX MD WPUR712 097-33-57.6 W 0001972085 Brazos Electric Power Cooperative, Inc. Morgan 12/15/2004 05945.20000 32-07-19.5 N TX MD WPUR712 097-33-57.6 W 0001972085 Brazos Electric Power Cooperative, Inc. Morgan 12/15/2004 06034.15000 32-07-19.5 N TX MD WPUN576 098-07-09.2 W 0001972210 Brazos Electric Power Cooperative, Inc. Progress 12/15/2004 05945.20000 32-42-00.5 N TX MD WPUN576 098-07-09.2 W 0001972210 Brazos Electric Power Cooperative, Inc. Progress 12/15/2004 06093.45000 32-42-00.5 N TX MD WPUN576 098-07-09.2 W 0001972210 Brazos Electric Power Cooperative, Inc. Progress 12/15/2004 06730.00000 32-42-00.5 N TX MD WPUN576 098-07-09.2 W 0001972210 Brazos Electric Power Cooperative, Inc. Progress 12/15/2004 06740.00000 32-42-00.5 N TX MD WPUN576 098-07-09.2 W 0001972210 Brazos Electric Power Cooperative, Inc.
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-256011A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-256011A1.txt
    • OF SPOKANE 01/03/2005 06806.25000 47-41-36.6 N AZ MD WPZM259 111-42-44.4 W 0001993981 City of Casa Grande, Arizona Casa Grande 01/04/2005 00933.17500 32-49-18.8 N AZ MD WPZM259 111-42-44.4 W 0001993981 City of Casa Grande, Arizona Casa Grande 01/04/2005 00933.77500 32-49-18.8 N AZ MD WPZM259 111-42-44.4 W 0001993981 City of Casa Grande, Arizona Casa Grande 01/04/2005 00934.37500 32-49-18.8 N TN MD WNTD728 089-23-00.5 W 0001994682 DYERSBURG ELECTRIC SYSTEM DYERSBURG 01/05/2005 00928.49375 36-02-22.9 N TN MD WNTD728 089-23-00.5 W 0001994682 DYERSBURG ELECTRIC SYSTEM DYERSBURG 01/05/2005 00952.49375 36-02-22.9 N SC MD WPST603 081-51-45.1 W 0001997471 South Carolina Public Service Authority Trenton 01/07/2005 06600.62500 33-44-28.7 N SC MD WPST603 081-51-45.1 W 0001997471 South Carolina Public Service Authority Trenton 01/07/2005 06670.00000 33-44-28.7 N NE MD WNTL846 096-11-41.0
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-256267A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-256267A1.txt
    • Other Andorra $135,012 9.2 9.8 30.7 41.0 9.3 $221 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 $0 1,233,272 6.7 15.5 34.1 35.8 7.9 Austria $24,332,000 59.0 1.8 15.4 20.7 3.1 $861,359 27.3 0.0 33.4 29.7 9.5 $236,414 1.2 93.2 5.6 0.0 0.0 126,782,194 37.4 4.9 18.2 30.9 8.6 Belgium $47,235,918 66.0 1.4 14.5 16.1 2.0 $3,007,339 67.3 3.7 15.3 12.5 1.2 $3,964,804 0.5 98.4 1.1 0.0 0.0 238,021,299 42.8 5.1 23.1 19.9 9.1 Cyprus $5,878,313 68.9 1.9 15.0 11.3 2.9 $288,424 41.8 0.0 37.8 18.7 1.6 $58,206 54.6 0.0 45.4 0.0 0.0 28,345,029 32.9 3.2 34.5 22.3 7.1 Denmark $16,572,844 49.3 2.8 28.1 15.5 4.3 $1,440,655 17.9 18.8 34.6 27.9 0.8 $1,633,327 1.1 98.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 116,207,159 24.2 11.5 37.0 21.5 5.8
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-256274A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-256274A1.txt
    • 02644.00000 18-21-38.7 N PR NE 066-59-53.4 W 0002010158 WHTV BROADCASTING CORPORATIONTRUJILLO ALTO 12/17/2004 02650.00000 - 02656.00000 18-21-38.7 N PR NE 066-59-53.4 W 0002010158 WHTV BROADCASTING CORPORATIONTRUJILLO ALTO 12/17/2004 02662.00000 - 02668.00000 18-21-38.7 N PR NE 066-59-53.4 W 0002010158 WHTV BROADCASTING CORPORATIONTRUJILLO ALTO 12/17/2004 02674.00000 - 02680.00000 18-21-38.7 N PR NE 066-12-16.4 W 0002010232 WHTV BROADCASTING CORPORATIONBAYAMON 12/17/2004 02596.00000 - 02602.00000 18-23-00.5 N PR NE 066-12-16.4 W 0002010232 WHTV BROADCASTING CORPORATIONBAYAMON 12/17/2004 02602.00000 - 02608.00000 18-23-00.5 N Page 21 MD - Multipoint Distribution Service (MDS and MMDS) State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City PR NE 066-12-16.4 W 0002010232 WHTV BROADCASTING CORPORATIONBAYAMON 12/17/2004 02608.00000 - 02614.00000 18-23-00.5 N PR NE 066-12-16.4 W
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-256480A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-256480A1.txt
    • PR NE 066-59-26.0 W 0002017568 WHTV BROADCASTING CORPORATIONDEL RIO ENCANTA 12/17/2004 02578.00000 - 02584.00000 18-21-23.0 N PR NE 066-59-26.0 W 0002017568 WHTV BROADCASTING CORPORATIONDEL RIO ENCANTA 12/17/2004 02584.00000 - 02590.00000 18-21-23.0 N PR NE 066-59-26.0 W 0002017568 WHTV BROADCASTING CORPORATIONDEL RIO ENCANTA 12/17/2004 02590.00000 - 02596.00000 18-21-23.0 N PR NE 066-12-16.4 W 0002017594 WHTV BROADCASTING CORPORATIONBAYAMON 12/17/2004 02500.00000 - 02506.00000 18-23-00.5 N PR NE 066-12-16.4 W 0002017594 WHTV BROADCASTING CORPORATIONBAYAMON 12/17/2004 02506.00000 - 02512.00000 18-23-00.5 N PR NE 066-12-16.4 W 0002017594 WHTV BROADCASTING CORPORATIONBAYAMON 12/17/2004 02512.00000 - 02518.00000 18-23-00.5 N PR NE 066-12-16.4 W 0002017594 WHTV BROADCASTING CORPORATIONBAYAMON 12/17/2004 02518.00000 - 02524.00000 18-23-00.5 N PR NE 066-12-16.4 W 0002017594 WHTV BROADCASTING CORPORATIONBAYAMON 12/17/2004 02524.00000 - 02530.00000 18-23-00.5 N PR NE 066-12-16.4
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-256810A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-256810A1.txt
    • Commission's Rules and Regulations or its policies. For information on other microwave facilities, please refer to Public Notices released by the Media, Common Carrier, and Wireless Bureaus. CAR-20050215AA-10 WAHIAWA HI WLY-476 Renewal of License CRAIG WIRELESS HONOLULU, INC. CAR-20050215AC-10 KD-55020 Renewal of License RAINBOW NEWS 12 COMPANY CAR-20050215AD-01 HAGERMAN ID NEW License for a New Station CABLE ONE, INC T-L: 0.5 miles East on Hagerman Avenue HAGERMAN ID 42-48-43.0N 114-52-53.0W Channels: 17703-17709, 17709-17715, 17727-17733, 17733-17739, 17763-17769 CAR-20050215AF-08 WHZ-359 Assignment of License CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS VI, LLC From: CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS VI, LLC To: Rapid Communications, LLC (1) For further information about this Public Notice contact the Media Bureau at (202) 418-7000 CAR-20050215AG-08 BLACK MOUNTAIN KY WHZ-698 Assignment of License ENSTAR CABLE OF CUMBERLAND
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-256825A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-256825A1.txt
    • 0002039880 BNSF Railway Co MITCHELL 02/09/2005 06286.19000 41-55-17.0 N Page 19 MG - Microwave Industrial/Business Pool State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City NE MD WIA782 103-52-15.8 W 0002039880 BNSF Railway Co MITCHELL 02/09/2005 06315.84000 41-55-17.0 N WY MD WIA785 104-10-45.2 W 0002039887 BNSF Railway Co South Torrington 02/09/2005 02192.80000 42-01-00.5 N WY MD WIA785 104-10-45.2 W 0002039887 BNSF Railway Co South Torrington 02/09/2005 05945.20000 42-01-00.5 N WY MD WIA785 104-10-45.2 W 0002039887 BNSF Railway Co South Torrington 02/09/2005 06034.15000 42-01-00.5 N WY MD WIA788 104-27-59.8 W 0002039920 BNSF Railway Co LINGLE 02/09/2005 01905.00000 42-05-45.8 N WY MD WIA788 104-27-59.8 W 0002039920 BNSF Railway Co LINGLE 02/09/2005 02131.60000 42-05-45.8 N WY
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-256927A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-256927A1.txt
    • 32-57-33.4 N NC NE 082-59-40.0 W 0002047050 BELLSOUTH TELECOMMUNICATIONS, WAYNESVILLE 02/14/2005 06685.00000 35-39-31.0 N NC NE 083-07-10.4 W 0002047055 BELLSOUTH TELECOMMUNICATIONS, SYLVA 02/14/2005 06600.00000 35-26-27.7 N NC NE 082-21-27.0 W 0002047117 BELLSOUTH TELECOMMUNICATIONS, HENDERSONVILLE 02/14/2005 06820.00000 35-27-39.0 N NC NE 082-21-27.0 W 0002047117 BELLSOUTH TELECOMMUNICATIONS, HENDERSONVILLE 02/14/2005 06835.00000 35-27-39.0 N NC NE 083-02-04.4 W 0002047160 BELLSOUTH TELECOMMUNICATIONS, WAYNESVILLE 02/14/2005 06825.00000 35-38-00.5 N NC NE 083-02-04.4 W 0002047160 BELLSOUTH TELECOMMUNICATIONS, WAYNESVILLE 02/14/2005 06845.00000 35-38-00.5 N NC NE 082-46-11.4 W 0002047172 BELLSOUTH TELECOMMUNICATIONS, CANTAN 02/14/2005 06760.00000 35-23-45.3 N NC NE 082-56-01.0 W 0002047178 BELLSOUTH TELECOMMUNICATIONS, WAYNESVILLE 02/14/2005 06730.00000 35-29-20.0 N NC NE 082-56-01.0 W 0002047178 BELLSOUTH TELECOMMUNICATIONS, WAYNESVILLE 02/14/2005 06760.00000 35-29-20.0 N Page 19 CF - Common Carrier Fixed Point to Point Microwave
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-257087A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-257087A1.txt
    • Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City RO WMX943 0002056734 Nextel Spectrum Acquisition Corp. 02/22/2005 RO WMX942 0002056735 Nextel Spectrum Acquisition Corp. 02/22/2005 RO WLW859 0002056736 Nextel Spectrum Acquisition Corp. 02/22/2005 Page 21 MG - Microwave Industrial/Business Pool State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City UT AM WPYH839 109-25-00.5 W 0001897269 University of Utah Utah Education NetworDutch John 02/24/2005 06256.54000 40-57-33.8 N UT AM WPYA289 109-43-31.5 W 0001897405 University of Utah, Utah Education NetworManila 02/24/2005 06004.50000 40-59-24.8 N FL AM 081-34-11.6 W 0001903851 ClearWire JACKSONVILLE 02/22/2005 17920.00000 30-16-51.7 N FL AM 081-34-11.6 W 0001903851 ClearWire JACKSONVILLE 02/22/2005 21875.00000 30-16-51.7 N FL AM 081-32-48.7 W 0001904024 ClearWire Jacksonville 02/22/2005 19480.00000
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-257267A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-257267A1.txt
    • 98.9 50 XEPRS Interamericana de Radio, S.A de C.V. Rancho del Mar AM 1090 50 XHRM Radio Moderna Mexicana, S.A. de C.V. Tijuana, MX FM 92.5 100 XHOCL (XHCR*) XETRA Comunicaciones, S.A. de C.V. Tijuana, MX FM 99.3 25 XHA (XHAMR*) Broadcasting Baja California, S.A. de C.V. Tijuana, MX FM 94.5 20 XESPN(XEMMM*) Radio 80, S.A. Tijuana, MX AM 800 0.5/0.25 * Call sign reported in original application Where two numbers are given, first is daytime power and second is nighttime power Page 1 of 1
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-257439A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-257439A1.txt
    • Inc Houston 03/07/2005 00128.92500 29-59-03.9 N SC NE 078-55-42.0 W 0002069837 Aeronautical Radio, Inc Myrtle Beach 03/07/2005 00129.62500 33-40-47.1 N IL NE 087-45-08.7 W 0002069851 Aeronautical Radio, Inc Chicago 03/07/2005 00131.07500 41-47-09.5 N CO NE 104-42-00.9 W 0002069861 Aeronautical Radio, Inc Colorado Springs 03/07/2005 00136.85000 38-48-20.9 N AL NE 085-25-59.8 W 0002074999 Auburn University Robert G. Pitts AirportAuburn 03/11/2005 00123.00000 32-37-00.5 N CO NE 106-19-00.0 W 0002075448 Leadville Airport Inc. Leadville 03/11/2005 00122.80000 39-13-25.0 N TX NE 098-28-50.2 W 0002075571 Aeronautical Radio, Inc San Antonio 03/11/2005 00129.42500 29-31-46.6 N OK NE 097-47-28.0 W 0002075637 Aeronautical Radio, Inc Enid 03/11/2005 00131.32500 36-22-45.1 N OK NE 097-05-59.2 W 0002075661 Aeronautical Radio, Inc Ponca City 03/11/2005 00131.32500 36-43-55.5 N AZ NE 110-20-39.8 W 0002075702
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-257820A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-257820A1.txt
    • 03/23/2005 06345.49000 41-50-43.2 N OH MD WML481 080-46-02.3 W 0002096596 New Par PLYMOUTH 03/23/2005 06850.00000 41-50-43.2 N CO MD WQCD544 108-18-36.2 W 0002096689 Nextel License Holdings 4, Inc. Mesa 03/23/2005 06795.62500 39-08-37.6 N CO MD WQCD544 108-18-36.2 W 0002096689 Nextel License Holdings 4, Inc. Mesa 03/23/2005 06795.62500 39-08-37.6 N VA MD WLN500 077-33-43.0 W 0002096692 Cellco Partnership RICHMOND 03/23/2005 10715.00000 37-36-00.5 N Page 17 CF - Common Carrier Fixed Point to Point Microwave State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City VA MD WLN500 077-33-43.0 W 0002096692 Cellco Partnership RICHMOND 03/23/2005 10735.00000 37-36-00.5 N VA MD WLN500 077-33-43.0 W 0002096692 Cellco Partnership RICHMOND 03/23/2005 10775.00000 37-36-00.5 N VA MD WLN500 077-33-43.0 W
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-257989A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-257989A1.txt
    • 06393.05400 34-00-05.4 N GA MD WLM479 084-09-01.7 W 0002102702 Verizon Wireless (VAW) LLC DULUTH 03/28/2005 10755.00000 34-00-05.4 N GA MD WLM479 084-09-01.7 W 0002102702 Verizon Wireless (VAW) LLC DULUTH 03/28/2005 11132.50000 34-00-05.4 N GA MD WLM479 084-09-01.7 W 0002102702 Verizon Wireless (VAW) LLC DULUTH 03/28/2005 11155.00000 34-00-05.4 N VA MD WLT715 075-58-17.7 W 0002102705 Cellco Partnership VIRGINIA BEACH 03/28/2005 11225.00000 36-50-00.5 N Page 13 CF - Common Carrier Fixed Point to Point Microwave State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City VA MD WLT715 075-58-17.7 W 0002102705 Cellco Partnership VIRGINIA BEACH 03/28/2005 11245.00000 36-50-00.5 N VA MD WLT715 075-58-17.7 W 0002102705 Cellco Partnership VIRGINIA BEACH 03/28/2005 11265.00000 36-50-00.5 N VA MD WLT715
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-258216A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-258216A1.txt
    • OF 04/11/2005 AM WWQ3 0002101058 ROCK HILL, CITY OF 04/12/2005 AS - Aural Studio Transmitter Link State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City MD AM WGZ675 076-42-27.2 W 0002015002 BALTIMORE CITY COMMUNITY COLLEGBALTIMORE 04/13/2005 00947.00000 39-21-28.4 N MN AM WBG605 093-31-26.3 W 0002117896 NORTHERN COMMUNITY RADIO GRAND RAPIDS 04/12/2005 00951.50000 47-14-00.5 N Page 1 AS - Aural Studio Transmitter Link State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City MA MD WLF927 070-14-04.0 W 0002120357 BOCH BROADCASTING LIMITED PARTNWEST YARMOUTH 04/11/2005 00951.50000 41-38-08.0 N MA MD WGV688 070-14-04.0 W 0002120363 BOCH BROADCASTING LIMITED PARTNWEST YARMOUTH 04/11/2005 00947.50000 41-38-08.0 N FL MD WLF205 080-08-23.1
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-258260A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-258260A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-258260A1.txt
    • through the Federal budget. We collect substantial revenue on behalf of the Commonwealth through telecommunications carrier, radiocommunications licence fees and charges and through charges on telecommunications numbers. The ABA is funded almost entirely by Government, via an annual appropriation in the order of AUD16.5m. The ABA also generates a small amount of independent revenue, but this is typically less than AUD0.5m. 7. How is the head of your organization selected? How long may the head serve in the office, and are there other conditions to the office? What would cause the head of the organization to leave? The Chair of the ACA is appointed under the Authority's governing legislation. The appointment is made by the Governor-General of Australia under written instrument
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-258527A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-258527A1.txt
    • 076-01-26.8 W 0002138183 Cellco Partnership Virginia Beach 04/26/2005 36-43-16.5 N VA RM KNKA306 076-00-03.2 W 0002138183 Cellco Partnership Virginia Beach 04/26/2005 36-47-20.4 N VA RM KNKA306 076-00-03.2 W 0002138183 Cellco Partnership Virginia Beach 04/26/2005 36-47-20.4 N VA RM KNKA306 076-00-03.2 W 0002138183 Cellco Partnership Virginia Beach 04/26/2005 36-47-20.4 N VA RM KNKA306 075-58-17.7 W 0002138183 Cellco Partnership Virginia Beach 04/26/2005 36-50-00.5 N VA RM KNKA306 075-58-17.7 W 0002138183 Cellco Partnership Virginia Beach 04/26/2005 36-50-00.5 N VA RM KNKA306 076-10-50.4 W 0002138183 Cellco Partnership Virginia Beach 04/26/2005 36-50-31.7 N VA RM KNKA306 076-10-50.4 W 0002138183 Cellco Partnership Virginia Beach 04/26/2005 36-50-31.7 N VA RM KNKA306 076-10-50.4 W 0002138183 Cellco Partnership Virginia Beach 04/26/2005 36-50-31.7 N VA RM KNKA306 076-01-25.5 W 0002138183 Cellco
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-258528A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-258528A1.txt
    • N CA RM KNKA273 121-49-13.9 W 0002139385 Sacramento Valley Limited Partnership WOODLAND 04/27/2005 38-40-42.7 N CA RM KNKA273 121-49-13.9 W 0002139385 Sacramento Valley Limited Partnership WOODLAND 04/27/2005 38-40-42.7 N CA RM KNKA273 121-49-13.9 W 0002139385 Sacramento Valley Limited Partnership WOODLAND 04/27/2005 38-40-42.7 N CA RM KNKA273 121-49-13.9 W 0002139385 Sacramento Valley Limited Partnership WOODLAND 04/27/2005 38-40-42.7 N WA RM KNKA280 121-30-00.5 W 0002139389 Seattle SMSA Limited Partnership Crystal Mountain 04/27/2005 46-56-16.9 N WA RM KNKA280 122-16-40.4 W 0002139389 Seattle SMSA Limited Partnership Eatonville 04/27/2005 46-52-20.4 N WA RM KNKA280 122-16-40.4 W 0002139389 Seattle SMSA Limited Partnership Eatonville 04/27/2005 46-52-20.4 N WA RM KNKA280 122-11-29.4 W 0002139389 Seattle SMSA Limited Partnership ELBE 04/27/2005 46-46-20.4 N WA RM KNKA280 122-11-29.4 W 0002139389 Seattle
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-259015A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-259015A1.txt
    • MX FM 91.7 15 XHMORE Radio Sensacion de Tijuana, S.A. Tijuana, MX FM 98.9 50 XEPRS Interamericana de Radio, S.A de C.V. Rancho del Mar AM 1090 50 XHRM Radio Moderna Mexicana, S.A. de C.V. Tijuana, MX FM 92.5 100 XHOCL (XHCR*) XETRA Comunicaciones, S.A. de C.V. Tijuana, MX FM 99.3 25 XESPN(XEMMM*) Radio 80, S.A. Tijuana, MX AM 800 0.5/0.25 Deferred part of renewal application for Section 325(c) Permit to deliver both Spanish and English language programming consisting of self-contained broadcasts of local, regional, and/or national news to the following Mexican radio stations: XHTIM Sociedad Mexicana de Radio de Baja California Tijuana, MX FM 97.7 3 XHFG Radiofusora de XHFG, S.A. de C.V. Tijuana, MX FM 107.3 15 XERCN Broadcasting
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-259829A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-259829A1.txt
    • LICENSE HOLDINGS 1, INC. CUDJOE KEY 06/27/2005 06615.00000 24-40-37.0 N FL NE 081-30-40.0 W 0002217154 NEXTEL LICENSE HOLDINGS 1, INC. CUDJOE KEY 06/27/2005 06635.62500 24-40-37.0 N FL NE 081-44-19.0 W 0002217155 NEXTEL LICENSE HOLDINGS 1, INC. KEY WEST 06/27/2005 06795.62500 24-34-19.0 N FL NE 081-44-19.0 W 0002217155 NEXTEL LICENSE HOLDINGS 1, INC. KEY WEST 06/27/2005 10621.25000 24-34-19.0 N FL NE 081-08-00.5 W 0002217157 NEXTEL LICENSE HOLDINGS 1, INC. Clewiston 06/27/2005 06655.62500 26-37-55.3 N FL NE 081-08-00.5 W 0002217157 NEXTEL LICENSE HOLDINGS 1, INC. Clewiston 06/27/2005 06676.25000 26-37-55.3 N FL NE 080-58-57.0 W 0002217159 NEXTEL LICENSE HOLDINGS 1, INC. CLEWISTON 06/27/2005 06836.25000 26-45-54.0 N FL NE 081-21-49.3 W 0002217160 NEXTEL LICENSE HOLDINGS 1, INC. CARNESTOWN 06/27/2005 06746.25000 25-54-36.3 N FL NE 081-14-19.4
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-259870A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-259870A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-259870A1.txt
    • lines, compared to a 13% increase in the first half of the year, from 16.4 million to 18.6 million lines. The remaining 2.7 million high-speed connections in service at the end of 2004 were satellite or terrestrial wireless connections, fiber or powerline connections, or wireline connections other than ADSL. During 2004, satellite or terrestrial wireless connections increased by 50%, to 0.5 million, and fiber or powerline connections increased by 16%, to 0.7 million. Advanced Services Lines Advanced services lines of all technology types increased by 42%, to 28.9 million lines, during the year 2004. They increased by 23% during the second half of 2004, from 23.5 million to 28.9 million lines, compared to a 15% increase during the first half of
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-259960A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-259960A1.txt
    • 00944.50000 40-47-21.0 N TX NE 101-54-59.1 W 0002226240 WEST TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY Canyon 07/05/2005 00949.87500 34-59-01.6 N TX NE 101-54-59.1 W 0002226240 WEST TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY Canyon 07/05/2005 00950.12500 34-59-01.6 N NM NE 105-58-49.0 W 0002226693 JAMES S. BUMPOUS Santa Fe 07/05/2005 00946.00000 35-39-47.0 N MN NE 095-08-13.1 W 0002229957 NORMIN BROADCASTING CO. Wadena 07/07/2005 00951.50000 46-26-23.7 N AZ NE 110-55-00.5 W 0002230358 GOOD NEWS RADIO BROADCASTING, Tucson 07/07/2005 00951.00000 32-11-12.6 N FL NE 082-32-57.0 W 0002231336 JABLAMO LICENSE HOLDINGS, LLC WILLISTON 07/07/2005 00944.50000 29-25-05.0 N FL NE 082-17-21.0 W 0002231337 JABLAMO LICENSE HOLDINGS, LLC Gainesville 07/07/2005 00948.00000 29-37-24.0 N FL NE 082-32-57.0 W 0002231340 JABLAMO LICENSE HOLDINGS, LLC WILLISTON 07/07/2005 00951.50000 29-25-05.0 N FL NE 082-17-21.0 W 0002231341 JABLAMO LICENSE
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-260261A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-260261A1.txt
    • Inc. Unity 07/18/2005 06855.00000 44-26-24.6 N OR NE 117-47-12.7 W 0002243197 RCC Minnesota, Inc. Baker 07/18/2005 06585.00000 44-35-13.9 N OR NE 117-47-12.7 W 0002243197 RCC Minnesota, Inc. Baker 07/18/2005 06625.00000 44-35-13.9 N OR NE 117-47-12.7 W 0002243197 RCC Minnesota, Inc. Baker 07/18/2005 06685.00000 44-35-13.9 N OR NE 117-14-59.0 W 0002243198 RCC Minnesota, Inc. Lime 07/18/2005 06845.00000 44-25-52.0 N NM NE 106-13-00.5 W 0002243273 Verizon Wireless (VAW) LLC Santa Fe 07/18/2005 06815.00000 35-30-53.7 N CA NE 117-31-35.0 W 0002243472 SKYRIVER COMMUNICATIONS RIVERSIDE 07/18/2005 18120.00000 33-55-11.0 N AZ NE 112-12-15.3 W 0002243597 Verizon Wireless (VAW) LLC Williams 07/18/2005 06545.00000 35-11-58.6 N NM NE 106-14-58.1 W 0002243940 New Mexico RSA 3 Limited Partnership Bingham 07/18/2005 06655.00000 33-49-34.1 N OH NE 081-30-44.0 W 0002243984 FIBERTOWER
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-260411A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-260411A1.pdf
    • technical rules set forth elsewhere in this part and in accordance with the terms of the station authorization...(c) [t]he licensee must establish monitoring procedures and schedules for the station...'' Although the Commission authorized Station WBTE(AM) to broadcast from latitude 35º 58' 00" North and longitude 076º 56' 54" West (NAD27), the station was actually broadcasting from a location more than 0.5 km from its authorized coordinates. In addition, the station had not established monitoring procedures and schedules to determine compliance with §73.1560 regarding operating power and §73.1570 regarding modulation levels. 47 C.F.R. § 73.1560(a)(1): ``...]T]he antenna input power of an AM station as determined by the procedures specified in § 73.51 must be maintained as near as is practicable to the
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-260437A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-260437A1.txt
    • Alaska 1,081 24.5 19 0.4 15 0.3 54 1.2 17 0.4 3,216 73.1 4,403 Arizona 10,528 53.3 455 2.3 189 1.0 626 3.2 162 0.8 7,782 39.4 19,741 Arkansas 3,769 26.7 765 5.4 88 0.6 245 1.7 316 2.2 8,915 63.2 14,098 California 66,419 43.6 7,558 5.0 1,019 0.7 3,204 2.1 2,104 1.4 72,048 47.3 152,351 Colorado 10,290 52.4 95 0.5 119 0.6 580 2.9 257 1.3 8,307 42.3 19,647 Connecticut 6,717 43.2 386 2.5 126 0.8 247 1.6 252 1.6 7,826 50.3 15,553 Delaware 2,199 53.0 39 1.0 88 2.1 99 2.4 19 0.5 1,705 41.1 4,150 District of Columbia 3,560 66.6 22 0.4 154 2.9 158 3.0 22 0.4 1,427 26.7 5,343 Florida 33,561 49.4 1,706 2.5 504 0.7
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-260689A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-260689A1.txt
    • Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City OR MD WPJB532 123-23-07.2 W 0002281238 USCOC OF OREGON RSA #5, INC. WOLF CREEK 08/17/2005 06063.80000 42-43-50.4 N OR MD WPJB532 123-23-07.2 W 0002281238 USCOC OF OREGON RSA #5, INC. WOLF CREEK 08/17/2005 06093.45000 42-43-50.4 N TX MD WMT575 098-10-03.6 W 0002282026 TEXAS RSA 19 LIMITED PARTNERSHIPENCINO 08/17/2005 06615.00000 26-56-00.5 N TX MD WMM956 097-47-19.8 W 0002282110 TEXAS RSA 19 LIMITED PARTNERSHIPARMSTRONG 08/17/2005 06775.00000 26-57-39.5 N TX MD WMQ762 098-37-08.5 W 0002282119 TEXAS RSA 19 LIMITED PARTNERSHIPFREER 08/17/2005 06063.80000 27-50-05.4 N TX MD WMQ762 098-37-08.5 W 0002282119 TEXAS RSA 19 LIMITED PARTNERSHIPFREER 08/17/2005 06660.00000 27-50-05.4 N TX MD WMQ762 098-37-08.5 W 0002282119 TEXAS RSA 19 LIMITED PARTNERSHIPFREER 08/17/2005 06675.00000 27-50-05.4
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-260984A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-260984A1.txt
    • Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City CA NE 117-11-36.0 W 0002304777 QUALCOMM INC. SAN DIEGO 09/08/2005 19400.00000 32-54-11.3 N CA NE 117-11-36.0 W 0002304777 QUALCOMM INC. SAN DIEGO 09/08/2005 19480.00000 32-54-11.3 N TX NE 100-59-55.4 W 0002305567 APPROACH OPERATING OZONA 09/08/2005 00928.65625 30-48-34.2 N TX NE 100-59-55.4 W 0002305567 APPROACH OPERATING OZONA 09/08/2005 00952.65625 30-48-34.2 N CA NE P 117-13-00.5 W 0002305681 Fallbrook Public Utility District Fallbrook 09/08/2005 00956.26875 33-21-32.5 N CA NE P 117-13-00.5 W 0002305681 Fallbrook Public Utility District Fallbrook 09/08/2005 00956.26875 33-21-32.5 N OH NE 083-41-15.0 W 0002306541 FELHC INC HOLLAND 09/09/2005 06685.00000 41-37-24.0 N IA NE 092-27-36.7 W 0002306563 UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANYCLUTIER 09/09/2005 00932.43125 42-01-45.1 N IA NE 092-27-36.7 W 0002306563 UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANYCLUTIER
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-261024A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-261024A2.txt
    • 33.2 35.5 49.9 9.2 Philippines 37.0 42.9 42.3 50.2 33.4 50.8 38.9 57.3 73.3 104.3 85.4 18.0 Poland 28.7 34.0 31.5 27.1 27.3 27.8 24.9 24.2 13.3 20.0 16.1 -10.8 Russia 31.6 30.2 26.6 31.0 29.8 22.0 17.4 27.6 54.9 24.1 18.1 2.0 Saudi Arabia 29.8 28.2 24.1 27.2 31.8 36.9 32.0 24.0 35.7 30.3 27.8 -3.3 Sierra Leone 0.4 0.5 0.5 1.0 1.2 1.2 0.6 1.2 1.1 1.9 1.3 11.0 Singapore 37.7 43.5 51.1 53.5 61.4 65.8 26.4 72.7 73.5 65.0 87.7 12.6 South Africa 20.8 24.3 26.7 29.3 31.1 36.5 38.9 39.0 28.1 36.7 77.9 9.8 Spain 45.4 51.8 46.1 61.5 85.3 76.0 85.1 112.0 108.3 144.4 139.0 14.0 Switzerland 66.1 73.0 77.3 91.9 98.0 102.1 81.7 118.1 98.0
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-261169A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-261169A1.txt
    • MSA Limited Partnership SANGER 09/15/2005 36-44-46.8 N CA RM KNKR215 119-16-52.4 W 0002316513 Fresno MSA Limited Partnership SANGER 09/15/2005 36-44-47.8 N Page 21 CL - Cellular State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City CA RM KNKR215 119-16-52.4 W 0002316513 Fresno MSA Limited Partnership SANGER 09/15/2005 36-44-47.8 N CA RM KNKR215 119-19-00.5 W 0002316513 Fresno MSA Limited Partnership Shaver Lake 09/15/2005 37-06-37.8 N SD RM KNKR251 102-28-02.5 W 0002316744 Verizon Wireless (VAW) LLC Bison 09/15/2005 45-31-36.9 N SD RM KNKR251 103-35-09.7 W 0002316744 Verizon Wireless (VAW) LLC Buffalo 09/15/2005 45-46-14.0 N SD RM KNKR251 102-33-33.3 W 0002316744 Verizon Wireless (VAW) LLC Enning 09/15/2005 44-34-22.0 N SD RM KNKR251 102-33-33.3 W 0002316744 Verizon
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-261822A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-261822A1.txt
    • Planning District CommisFRANKLIN 10/20/2005 10715.00000 36-41-52.5 N VA NE 077-03-07.9 W 0002353261 Hampton Roads Planning District CommisCOURTLAND 10/20/2005 06063.80000 36-43-28.5 N VA NE 077-03-07.9 W 0002353261 Hampton Roads Planning District CommisCOURTLAND 10/20/2005 11215.00000 36-43-28.5 N VA NE 077-03-07.9 W 0002353261 Hampton Roads Planning District CommisCOURTLAND 10/20/2005 11245.00000 36-43-28.5 N VA NE 076-17-56.8 W 0002353423 HAMPTON ROADS PLANNING DISTRICPORTSMOUTH 10/20/2005 11015.00000 36-50-00.5 N VA NE 076-19-53.1 W 0002353466 HAMPTON ROADS PLANNING DISTRICPORTSMOUTH 10/20/2005 06226.89000 36-50-22.2 N VA NE 076-19-53.1 W 0002353466 HAMPTON ROADS PLANNING DISTRICPORTSMOUTH 10/20/2005 11325.00000 36-50-22.2 N VA NE 076-19-53.1 W 0002353466 HAMPTON ROADS PLANNING DISTRICPORTSMOUTH 10/20/2005 11505.00000 36-50-22.2 N VA NE 076-19-53.1 W 0002353466 HAMPTON ROADS PLANNING DISTRICPORTSMOUTH 10/20/2005 11605.00000 36-50-22.2 N CT NE 072-42-30.1 W 0002354406 CITY OF
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262086A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262086A1.txt
    • Georgia 1,765.5 1,765.5 1,765.5 GA Hawaii 242.0 (0.4) 242.4 242.4 HI Idaho 213.8 213.8 213.8 ID Illinois 1,767.5 1,767.5 1,767.5 IL Indiana 963.9 963.9 963.9 IN Iowa 353.2 353.2 353.2 IA Kansas 339.0 339.0 339.0 KS Kentucky 754.4 754.4 754.3 0.1 NA NA 0.1 0.1 KY Louisiana 892.7 892.7 892.7 LA Maine 227.7 227.7 227.7 ME Maryland 1,088.2 1,088.2 1,087.8 0.5 NA NA 0.5 0.5 MD Massachusetts 1,143.8 1,143.8 1,143.8 MA Michigan 1,255.2 1,255.2 1,255.2 MI Minnesota 555.9 555.9 555.9 MN Mississippi 579.2 579.2 579.2 MS Missouri 831.1 831.1 831.1 MO Montana 125.0 125.0 125.0 MT Nebraska 245.5 245.5 245.5 NE Nevada 363.7 363.7 363.7 NV New Hampshire 194.2 194.2 194.2 NH New Jersey 1,296.1 1,296.1 1,296.1 NJ New Mexico 295.1
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262330A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262330A1.txt
    • Residential Installation Commitments Met Large Price-Cap Carriers 97.0 97.5 98.0 98.5 99.0 99.5 100.0 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 Years Percent o f Co mmitments M et Weighted BOC/Sprint Composite* Weighted Verizon Avg BellSouth Weighted SBC Avg. Qwest 17 ARMIS 43-05 Report 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 BellSouth 1.3 1.3 1.2 1.1 1.1 1.1 Qwest 1.1 1.0 0.6 0.5 0.4 0.3 SBC Ameritech 2.1 2.1 2.0 2.1 1.5 1.4 SBC Pacific 1.5 1.8 1.3 1.2 1.5 1.6 SBC Southwestern 0.8 0.8 2.2 1.8 1.9 2.0 SBC SNET 2.1 2.2 1.8 1.0 1.0 1.0 Verizon GTE 1.4 1.0 0.8 0.6 0.6 0.6 Verizon North (Combined with Verizon South) Verizon South 1.5 1.5 1.1 1.0 1.1 1.1 Sprint 4.5 3.9 3.2
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262354A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262354A1.txt
    • N VA NE 078-21-03.8 W 0002380416 Conterra, LLC Palmyra 11/15/2005 10875.00000 37-48-03.3 N VA NE 078-16-40.8 W 0002380428 Conterra, LLC Palmyra 11/15/2005 23175.00000 37-49-23.0 N MA NE 071-57-03.9 W 0002381571 Cellco Partnership Rutland 11/16/2005 10667.50000 42-24-32.1 N MA NE 071-47-36.2 W 0002381849 Cellco Partnership West Boylston 11/16/2005 10637.50000 42-20-47.3 N MA NE 071-44-42.5 W 0002381921 Cellco Partnership Sterling 11/16/2005 10647.50000 42-27-00.5 N NY NE 073-41-34.4 W 0002382645 Orange County-Poughkeepsie Limited PaUNION VALE 11/16/2005 10632.50000 41-41-19.2 N AZ NE 111-54-48.0 W 0002382677 VOICESTREAM PCS II LICENSE CORPOSCOTTSDALE 11/16/2005 19385.00000 33-36-47.0 N AZ NE 111-54-48.0 W 0002382677 VOICESTREAM PCS II LICENSE CORPOSCOTTSDALE 11/16/2005 19410.00000 33-36-47.0 N AZ NE 111-27-14.7 W 0002382775 ALLTEL Communications of the SouthwesPAGE 11/16/2005 06675.00000 36-54-29.5 N Page 12 CF
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262491A1.pdf
    • APPLICANT AND LOCATION CALL LETTERS N A T U R E O F A P P L I C A T I O N FILE NUMBER STATE E/P 11/23/2005 Actions of: TELEVISION APPLICATIONS FOR ORIGINAL CONSTRUCTION PERMIT DISMISSED , JACKSON CHAN-51 P MS CP FOR A NEW TELEVISION STATION TO SERVE JACKSON, MS; CH-51; TL: 2.4 KM SW OF RAYMOND, 0.5 KM S OF RT 18, HINDS COUNTY, MS; (32-14-26 90-24-15); TOWER SITE OF EXISTING STATION: WJTV; ERP(VIS): 5010 KW; HAAT: 371 METERS; ANT: ANDREW, GW25H0-HT01-51 UNITED TELEVISION, INC. 961001UW 84465 BPCT-19961001UW MS 11/25/2005 Actions of: DIGITAL TV APPLICATIONS FOR CP EXTENSION GRANTED , YOUNGSTOWN CHAN-41 E OH Extension of time to complete construction authorized pursuant to a permit for a
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262551A2.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262551A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262551A2.txt
    • Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs), and an email link to the contractor as well as contact information (including telephone numbers) for all appropriate staff members. Availability and Access The web site shall be available 24 hours per day, 7 days a week. The web site shall be able to support up to 600 simultaneous users with an average holding time of 0.5 hours. System Responsiveness Rapid response shall be required when accessing the web site. The contractor shall provide a system such that a 56 KBPS modem-equipped user will be able to view the complete home page in less than 8 seconds 95% of the time over any 12 month period. If a user is experiencing greater than 12 seconds to view
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262703A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262703A1.txt
    • 066-01-18.2 W 0002399330 SprintCom, Inc. (Puerto Rico) TRUJILLO ALTO 12/05/2005 19470.00000 18-22-13.3 N Page 11 CF - Common Carrier Fixed Point to Point Microwave State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City PR MD WPSL953 066-01-18.2 W 0002399330 SprintCom, Inc. (Puerto Rico) TRUJILLO ALTO 12/05/2005 19640.00000 18-22-13.3 N PR MD WPSL955 066-04-00.5 W 0002399331 SprintCom, Inc. (Puerto Rico) RIO PIEDRAS 12/05/2005 11365.00000 18-22-09.5 N PR MD WPSL955 066-04-00.5 W 0002399331 SprintCom, Inc. (Puerto Rico) RIO PIEDRAS 12/05/2005 17850.00000 18-22-09.5 N PR MD WPSL955 066-04-00.5 W 0002399331 SprintCom, Inc. (Puerto Rico) RIO PIEDRAS 12/05/2005 17885.00000 18-22-09.5 N PR MD WPSL955 066-04-00.5 W 0002399331 SprintCom, Inc. (Puerto Rico) RIO PIEDRAS 12/05/2005 18070.00000 18-22-09.5 N
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A1.txt
    • Shown in Millions) Data from FCC Form 499-A Cellular, PCS and SMR Wireless Other Wireless Telephony Line IntrastateInterstateInternational Total IntrastateInterstateInternational Total Fixed local service 303 Monthly service, local calling, connection charges, vertical features, and other local exchange service including subscriber line and PICC charges to IXCs a Provided as unbundled network elements $1 $1 b Provided under other arrangements 1.3 0.5 * 1.8 Total Line 303 2 1 * 3 304 Per-minute charges for originating or terminating calls a Provided under state or federal access tariff 1 1 * 2 b Provided as unbundled network elements or other contract arrangement 40 5 * 45 1 * 1 Total Line 304 40 6 * 46 1 * 1 305 Local private line
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A11.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A11.txt
    • 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 9.0 0.0 0.0 10. Traffic Overload 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 11. Environmental 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 398.9 0.0 12. External Power Failure 4.6 69.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 37.6 0.0 0.0 13. Massive Line Outage 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 14. Remote 0.0 0.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 15. Other/Unknown 4.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Table 9.3 (a) Switch Downtime Causes -- Outages More Than 2 Minutes in Duration Bell Companies - 2004 Please refer to text for notes and data qualifications 9 - 10 Alltel CenturyTel Cincinnati Citizens Citizens Iowa Sprint Valor Bell Frontier Telecom Total
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A3.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A3.txt
    • Shown in Millions) Data from FCC Form 499-A Cellular, PCS and SMR Wireless Other Wireless Telephony Line IntrastateInterstateInternational Total IntrastateInterstateInternational Total Fixed local service 303 Monthly service, local calling, connection charges, vertical features, and other local exchange service including subscriber line and PICC charges to IXCs a Provided as unbundled network elements $1 $1 b Provided under other arrangements 1.3 0.5 * 1.8 Total Line 303 2 1 * 3 304 Per-minute charges for originating or terminating calls a Provided under state or federal access tariff 1 1 * 2 b Provided as unbundled network elements or other contract arrangement 40 5 * 45 1 * 1 Total Line 304 40 6 * 46 1 * 1 305 Local private line
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A5.txt
    • 56 126 183 500 602 757 915 1,0281,0721,1321,1881,2631,6901,7182,2352,5922,9353,2593,4883,734 19861987198819891990199119921993199419951996199719981999200020012002200320042005 3 - 13 YearCompaniesHigh-Cost Loop Support Safety Net Additive Support Safety Valve Support High-Cost Model Support Long- Term Support Interstate Common Line Support Interstate Access Support Local Switching Support Total Support ILECs 864.2 - - - 472.9 - - 380.3 1,717.4 1999 CETCs 0.1 - - - 0.4 - - 0.0 0.5 Total 864.3 - - - 473.3 - - 380.3 1,718.0 ILECs 873.8 - - 218.7 477.3 - 278.8 384.7 2,233.3 2000 CETCs 0.4 - - 0.0 1.1 - 0.0 0.0 1.5 Total 874.1 - - 218.7 478.4 - 278.8 384.7 2,234.8 ILECs 921.5 - - 205.4 484.2 - 575.7 387.9 2,574.7 2001 CETCs 5.7 - - 0.3 8.0 - 1.0
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A8.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A8.txt
    • # Florida 88.7 93.4 4.7 * Georgia 86.2 91.2 5.0 * Hawaii 93.5 95.4 1.8 * Idaho 90.7 94.8 4.1 * Illinois 94.2 90.1 -4.1 # Indiana 91.6 91.8 0.3 Iowa 96.2 95.4 -0.8 Kansas 94.3 94.8 0.4 Kentucky 88.1 91.4 3.3 * Louisiana 89.7 90.9 1.3 Maine 93.4 96.6 3.2 * Maryland 95.7 93.4 -2.3 # Massachusetts 95.9 96.4 0.5 Michigan 92.8 93.7 0.9 Minnesota 95.8 97.1 1.3 Mississippi 82.4 89.6 7.2 * Missouri 91.5 93.7 2.2 * Montana 91.0 93.5 2.5 * Nebraska 95.7 95.7 0.0 Nevada 90.4 92.2 1.8 New Hampshire 94.3 96.4 2.1 * New Jersey 94.8 95.1 0.3 New Mexico 82.0 91.4 9.4 * New York 91.8 94.5 2.7 * North Carolina 88.3 93.3 5.0 *
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A9.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A9.txt
    • 15.6 14.6 15.9 6.2 8.0 1982 10.8 9.0 2.7 3.9 4.2 1.7 1983 3.1 0.2 1.4 0.0 7.4 3.9 1984 17.2 10.4 -4.3 -5.1 3.6 3.8 1985 8.9 12.4 -3.7 -3.0 0.6 2.1 1986 7.1 8.9 -9.4 -10.0 0.3 -3.5 1987 3.3 2.6 -12.4 -11.8 -3.0 -3.0 1988 4.5 4.6 -4.2 -2.1 -4.2 -3.8 1989 0.6 1.9 -1.3 -1.7 -2.6 0.5 1990 1.0 1.5 -3.7 -0.1 -2.2 -2.2 1991 5.1 2.1 1.3 -1.3 -1.5 -2.6 1992 0.5 -0.2 -1.3 1.0 -2.4 1.3 1993 1.0 0.8 6.5 3.8 0.2 -1.1 1994 -0.3 0.7 5.4 6.1 -1.0 -1.4 1995 2.6 ** 0.1 ** -3.8 ** 1996 0.9 0.2 3.7 0.7 6.1 0.9 1997 1.0 0.2 -4.3 7.8 2.8 -4.3 1998 1.3 -0.1 -0.8
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-263230A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-263230A1.txt
    • PISCATAWAY 01/12/2006 23125.00000 40-31-21.0 N Page 33 MG - Microwave Industrial/Business Pool State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City MA NE 072-32-55.3 W 0002445128 ISO New England, Inc. East Springfield 01/12/2006 06315.84000 42-09-04.3 N MA NE 072-38-20.3 W 0002445131 ISO New England, Inc. HOLYOKE 01/12/2006 06063.80000 42-11-07.3 N ID NE 116-57-00.5 W 0002445589 Infinity Communications, LLC Post Falls 01/12/2006 17800.00000 47-39-44.1 N ID NE 116-57-00.5 W 0002445589 Infinity Communications, LLC Post Falls 01/12/2006 17920.00000 47-39-44.1 N ID NE 116-57-00.5 W 0002445589 Infinity Communications, LLC Post Falls 01/12/2006 17960.00000 47-39-44.1 N ID NE 116-33-15.6 W 0002445598 Infinity Communications, LLC Careywood 01/12/2006 19400.00000 48-05-37.6 N ID NE 116-33-15.6 W 0002445598 Infinity Communications, LLC
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-263377A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-263377A1.txt
    • NC NE 079-32-56.1 W 0002447829 BELLSOUTH TELECOMMUNICATIONS, RUFFIN 01/17/2006 10995.00000 36-27-54.5 N NC NE 079-32-56.1 W 0002447829 BELLSOUTH TELECOMMUNICATIONS, RUFFIN 01/17/2006 11035.00000 36-27-54.5 N NC NE 079-32-56.1 W 0002447829 BELLSOUTH TELECOMMUNICATIONS, RUFFIN 01/17/2006 11075.00000 36-27-54.5 N NC NE 079-32-56.1 W 0002447829 BELLSOUTH TELECOMMUNICATIONS, RUFFIN 01/17/2006 11115.00000 36-27-54.5 N CA NE 121-28-11.7 W 0002448317 CALIFORNIA RURAL SERVICE AREA #1Tulelake 01/17/2006 10556.25000 41-57-00.5 N OR NE 121-35-40.8 W 0002448438 UNITED STATES CELLULAR OPERATINMerrill 01/17/2006 10621.25000 42-01-22.3 N NY NE 078-23-08.1 W 0002448914 New York RSA No. 3 Cellular PartnershipAlabama 01/17/2006 06150.28000 43-05-19.3 N CA NE 118-25-00.0 W 0002449389 AT&T CORP. LOS ANGELES 01/18/2006 19640.00000 34-03-31.0 N CA NE 118-27-35.5 W 0002449390 AT&T CORP. LOS ANGELES 01/18/2006 18080.00000 34-03-02.0 N NY NE 078-16-05.2 W
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-263694A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-263694A1.txt
    • 36-12-34.0 N NC RM KNKA316 080-48-04.0 W 0002464621 Cellco Partnership Jonesville 01/30/2006 36-12-34.0 N NC RM KNKA316 080-03-33.1 W 0002464621 Cellco Partnership KERNERSVILLE 01/30/2006 36-06-59.5 N NC RM KNKA316 080-03-33.1 W 0002464621 Cellco Partnership KERNERSVILLE 01/30/2006 36-06-59.5 N NC RM KNKA316 080-03-33.1 W 0002464621 Cellco Partnership KERNERSVILLE 01/30/2006 36-06-59.5 N NC RM KNKA316 080-07-19.2 W 0002464621 Cellco Partnership KERNERVILLE 01/30/2006 36-08-00.5 N NC RM KNKA316 080-07-19.2 W 0002464621 Cellco Partnership KERNERVILLE 01/30/2006 36-08-00.5 N NC RM KNKA316 080-22-26.2 W 0002464621 Cellco Partnership King 01/30/2006 36-22-31.5 N NC RM KNKA316 080-22-26.2 W 0002464621 Cellco Partnership King 01/30/2006 36-22-31.5 N NC RM KNKA316 080-21-47.2 W 0002464621 Cellco Partnership KING 01/30/2006 36-15-21.5 N NC RM KNKA316 080-27-24.2 W 0002464621 Cellco Partnership LEWISVILLE 01/30/2006 36-06-04.5
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-264075A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-264075A1.txt
    • Inc. MANHATTAN 02/23/2006 00861.93750 40-45-29.4 N NJ MD WNHJ741 073-59-44.5 W 0002498458 Motient License Inc. NORTH BERGEN 02/23/2006 00861.93750 40-48-12.4 N MD WPHT300 A 0002498460 PATEL, SHAILESH N 02/23/2006 00806.00000 - 00821.00000 NV MD WPHT300 117-44-44.5 W 0002498460 PATEL, SHAILESH N WINNEMUCCA 02/23/2006 00851.21250 40-49-23.7 N MD WNHJ745 A 0002498473 Motient License Inc. 02/23/2006 00809.00000 - 00824.00000 NY MD WNHJ745 073-52-00.5 W 0002498473 Motient License Inc. BROOKLYN 02/23/2006 00861.93750 40-39-07.4 N NY MD WNHJ745 073-57-27.5 W 0002498473 Motient License Inc. BROOKLYN 02/23/2006 00861.88750 40-39-53.4 N NY MD WNHJ745 073-57-27.5 W 0002498473 Motient License Inc. BROOKLYN 02/23/2006 00861.91250 40-39-53.4 N NY MD WNHJ745 073-57-27.5 W 0002498473 Motient License Inc. BROOKLYN 02/23/2006 00861.93750 40-39-53.4 N NY MD WNHJ745 074-00-43.5 W 0002498473 Motient License
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-264204A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-264204A1.txt
    • 00136.97500 34-38-13.9 N IL NE 089-05-49.9 W 0002510934 Aviation Spectrum Resources, Inc Rockford 03/03/2006 00131.95000 42-11-43.3 N CA NE 118-09-05.8 W 0002510947 Aviation Spectrum Resources, Inc Long Beach 03/03/2006 00131.75000 33-49-03.8 N LA RM KBK3 090-45-32.0 W 0002509180 Aviation Spectrum Resources Inc HOUMA 03/02/2006 00130.85000 29-30-01.6 N NC RM WQG5 080-55-59.3 W 0002510018 Aviation Spectrum Resources Inc CHARLOTTE 03/02/2006 00129.12500 35-13-00.5 N NC RM WQG5 080-55-59.3 W 0002510018 Aviation Spectrum Resources Inc CHARLOTTE 03/02/2006 00130.02500 35-13-00.5 N NC RM WQG5 080-55-59.3 W 0002510018 Aviation Spectrum Resources Inc CHARLOTTE 03/02/2006 00130.45000 35-13-00.5 N NC RM WQG5 080-55-59.3 W 0002510018 Aviation Spectrum Resources Inc CHARLOTTE 03/02/2006 00131.55000 35-13-00.5 N NC RM WQG5 080-55-59.3 W 0002510018 Aviation Spectrum Resources Inc CHARLOTTE 03/02/2006 00136.80000 35-13-00.5
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-264309A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-264309A1.txt
    • 17.7 23.0 $877,095 1.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 98.8 $150 0.0 0.0 0.7 0.0 99.3 64,373,684 14.4 15.5 22.1 15.7 32.3 Djibouti $1,850,703 43.6 9.8 19.7 18.3 8.7 $54,398 19.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 80.6 $9 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0100.0 7,983,035 43.8 8.8 23.1 14.3 9.9 Egypt $53,706,782 28.5 4.0 41.3 12.1 14.0 $1,777,621 16.7 0.0 10.0 2.1 71.1 $289,140 0.0 0.0 0.5 99.2 0.3 411,638,880 22.0 2.0 50.8 6.0 19.3 Equatorial Guinea $1,248,266 31.1 14.2 6.7 42.5 5.5 $20,194 88.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 11.3 $4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0100.0 4,869,125 31.5 18.5 17.6 25.9 6.5 Ethiopia $25,356,291 24.2 2.5 40.6 17.0 15.6 $835,820 37.5 0.0 16.8 4.9 40.8 $23 0.0 0.0 13.0 0.0 87.0 123,638,001 19.4 1.5 55.0 10.4 13.7 Gabon $3,516,330
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-264456A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-264456A1.txt
    • 155-15-35.0 W 0002531153 MOBILE TELEPHONE & PAGING INC. VOLCANO NATL PA 03/17/2006 00859.01250 19-25-55.0 N HI MD WPEP381 155-15-35.0 W 0002531153 MOBILE TELEPHONE & PAGING INC. VOLCANO NATL PA 03/17/2006 00860.13750 19-25-55.0 N MD WPFF711 A 0002531187 MOBILE TELEPHONE & PAGING INC. 03/17/2006 00809.00000 - 00824.00000 HI MD WPFF711 156-21-42.9 W 0002531187 MOBILE TELEPHONE & PAGING INC. KEONEHUNEHUNE 03/17/2006 00854.13750 20-39-00.5 N HI MD WPFF711 156-21-42.9 W 0002531187 MOBILE TELEPHONE & PAGING INC. KEONEHUNEHUNE 03/17/2006 00856.11250 20-39-00.5 N HI MD WPFF711 156-21-42.9 W 0002531187 MOBILE TELEPHONE & PAGING INC. KEONEHUNEHUNE 03/17/2006 00857.16250 20-39-00.5 N Page 52 YM - 800 MHz Trunked SMR (SMR, Site-specific) State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-264972A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-264972A1.txt
    • 02076.00000 - 02093.00000 34-48-39.4 N AL MD KB97256 P 087-37-46.6 W 0002573381 WAFF LICENSE SUBSIDIARY, LLC Florence 04/14/2006 02093.00000 - 02110.00000 34-48-39.4 N TS - TV Studio Transmitter Link State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City ND MD WAC282 098-51-27.6 W 0002566563 FORUM COMMUNICATIONS COMPANYDevils Lake 04/11/2006 07025.00000 - 07050.00000 48-06-00.5 N KY MD WQEA446 087-32-37.0 W 0002573459 COMCORP OF INDIANA LICENSE CORPHENDERSON 04/14/2006 12825.00000 - 12850.00000 37-53-17.2 N IN MD WLP450 087-34-30.0 W 0002573466 COMCORP OF INDIANA LICENSE CORPEVANSVILLE 04/14/2006 13025.00000 - 13050.00000 37-58-13.0 N AR NE 094-21-39.0 W 0002571806 NEW YORK TIMES MANAGEMENT SERFIGURE FIVE 04/13/2006 12800.00000 - 12825.00000 35-30-43.0 N Page 34 YK - Industrial/Business Pool - Commercial,
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-265093A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-265093A1.txt
    • Infrastructure Division 03/23/2006 WNUN723 FB2 OUR LADY OF LOURDES MEDICAL CENTER 463.75000000 CAMDEN 39-55-39.4 N NJ 75-5-43.6 W 1 2 03/23/2006 WNUN723 MO OUR LADY OF LOURDES MEDICAL CENTER 463.75000000 -- -- 4 1 03/23/2006 WNUN723 MO OUR LADY OF LOURDES MEDICAL CENTER 468.75000000 -- -- 4 1 03/18/2006 WPPD332 FB2C YOUNG LIFES WASHINGTON FAMILY RANCH 461.05000000 BIG MUDDY RA 44-50-0.5 N OR 120-29-28.1 W 2 1 03/18/2006 WPPD332 FB2C YOUNG LIFES WASHINGTON FAMILY RANCH 463.20000000 BIG MUDDY RA 44-50-0.5 N OR 120-29-28.1 W 2 1 03/18/2006 WPPD332 MO YOUNG LIFES WASHINGTON FAMILY RANCH 461.05000000 -- -- 6 1 03/18/2006 WPPD332 MO YOUNG LIFES WASHINGTON FAMILY RANCH 463.20000000 -- -- 6 1 03/18/2006 WPPD332 MO YOUNG LIFES WASHINGTON FAMILY RANCH 466.05000000
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-265170A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-265170A1.txt
    • Note: Figures may not add due to rounding. 13 Table 4 Telephone Number Utilization by State as of June 30, 2005 Assigned Intermediate Reserved Aging Administrative Available1 Total State/jurisdiction 000s % 000s % 000s % 000s % 000s % 000s % 000s Alabama 7,958 39.1 471 2.3 241 1.2 496 2.4 289 1.4 10,906 53.6 20,362 Alaska 1,137 24.3 22 0.5 14 0.3 48 1.0 38 0.8 3,413 73.0 4,672 Arizona 10,913 54.3 433 2.2 170 0.8 618 3.1 161 0.8 7,801 38.8 20,097 Arkansas 4,101 29.2 766 5.4 86 0.6 253 1.8 185 1.3 8,674 61.7 14,066 California 68,406 44.2 7,955 5.1 919 0.6 3,578 2.3 2,095 1.4 71,712 46.4 154,666 Colorado 10,511 52.8 70 0.4 132 0.7 539 2.7
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-265186A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-265186A1.txt
    • FIBERTOWER CORPORATION BARTOW 04/24/2006 10755.00000 27-54-21.3 N FL NE 081-52-44.0 W 0002581880 FIBERTOWER CORPORATION Lakeland-Winter Hav 04/24/2006 11245.00000 27-58-18.0 N FL NE 081-52-44.0 W 0002581880 FIBERTOWER CORPORATION Lakeland-Winter Hav 04/24/2006 11365.00000 27-58-18.0 N FL NE 081-52-44.0 W 0002581880 FIBERTOWER CORPORATION Lakeland-Winter Hav 04/24/2006 11405.00000 27-58-18.0 N FL NE 082-28-35.0 W 0002581881 FIBERTOWER CORPORATION TAMPA 04/24/2006 10915.00000 27-56-33.0 N FL NE 082-34-00.5 W 0002581885 FIBERTOWER CORPORATION CITRUS PARK 04/24/2006 11325.00000 28-05-41.3 N FL NE 082-33-52.9 W 0002581887 FIBERTOWER CORPORATION TAMPA 04/24/2006 10835.00000 28-02-35.5 N FL NE 082-33-52.9 W 0002581887 FIBERTOWER CORPORATION TAMPA 04/24/2006 10915.00000 28-02-35.5 N FL NE 082-27-03.3 W 0002581889 FIBERTOWER CORPORATION TAMPA 04/24/2006 21975.00000 28-01-24.1 N FL NE 082-27-02.6 W 0002581892 FIBERTOWER CORPORATION Tampa 04/24/2006 11325.00000 28-00-33.0 N FL NE
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-265287A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-265287A1.txt
    • 05/05/2006 06765.00000 39-45-18.1 N NV MD WIV56 119-27-42.6 W 0002596892 AT&T NEVADA RENO 05/05/2006 06825.00000 39-45-18.1 N NV MD WHE229 119-15-04.8 W 0002596893 AT&T NEVADA FERNLEY 05/05/2006 06226.89000 39-36-29.2 N NV MD WHE229 119-15-04.8 W 0002596893 AT&T NEVADA FERNLEY 05/05/2006 06605.00000 39-36-29.2 N ME MD WLK810 068-47-04.0 W 0002597250 RCC Minnesota, Inc BANGOR 05/05/2006 10568.12500 44-51-09.0 N CA MD WQEF550 120-23-00.5 W 0002597313 Nextel of California, Inc. Santa Maria 05/05/2006 06645.62500 34-50-05.7 N AZ MD KPV24 112-43-08.5 W 0002597402 Qwest Corporation GILA BEND 05/05/2006 06197.24000 32-56-53.1 N MT MD WPWB727 108-30-45.5 W 0002597475 Cutthroat Communications Billings 05/05/2006 22625.00000 45-46-51.7 N MT MD WPWB727 108-30-45.5 W 0002597475 Cutthroat Communications Billings 05/05/2006 22775.00000 45-46-51.7 N MT MD WPWB728 108-33-01.8 W 0002597478 Cutthroat Communications
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-265487A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-265487A1.txt
    • LP Churchville 05/15/2006 06034.15000 43-03-51.1 N NY MD WQEE835 078-09-11.7 W 0002609921 New York RSA No. 3 Cellular PartnershipPike 05/15/2006 06805.00000 42-34-05.0 N NY MD WQEQ268 078-16-23.4 W 0002610076 New York RSA No. 3 Cellular PartnershipALEXANDER 05/15/2006 05945.20000 42-55-21.1 N NY MD WQEQ268 078-16-23.4 W 0002610076 New York RSA No. 3 Cellular PartnershipALEXANDER 05/15/2006 06004.50000 42-55-21.1 N CA MD WPYU223 118-03-00.5 W 0002610096 Los Angeles SMSA Limited Partnership El Monte 05/15/2006 17880.00000 34-04-25.1 N CA MD WMS224 118-08-36.2 W 0002610743 LOS ANGELES SMSA LIMITED PARTNEDOWNEY 05/16/2006 18050.00000 33-54-12.0 N CA MD WMJ265 117-36-18.1 W 0002610744 LOS ANGELES SMSA LIMITED PARTNECORONA 05/16/2006 19450.00000 33-52-52.0 N CA MD WLN536 118-06-55.9 W 0002611068 LOS ANGELES SMSA LIMITED PARTNEDOWNEY 05/16/2006 10567.50000 33-55-28.2 N CA MD
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-265794A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-265794A1.txt
    • 00952.84375 34-58-07.3 N IN NE P 085-13-34.3 W 0002631501 AQUASOURCE UTILITY CENTER FT WAYNE 05/30/2006 00956.44375 41-08-50.6 N TX NE P 096-09-29.9 W 0002631505 CITY OF SEALY SEALY 05/30/2006 00956.43125 29-47-00.6 N MI NE P 083-12-57.6 W 0002631508 BROWNSOTWN TOWNSHIP BROWNSTOWN 05/30/2006 00956.33125 42-08-13.6 N MI NE P 083-19-47.3 W 0002631511 CITYOF LAPEER LAPEER 05/30/2006 00956.33125 43-03-23.0 N CA NE 119-46-00.5 W 0002633461 Pacific Gas and Electric Company Fresno 05/31/2006 00928.14375 36-43-09.8 N CA NE 119-46-00.5 W 0002633461 Pacific Gas and Electric Company Fresno 05/31/2006 00952.14375 36-43-09.8 N MS NE 090-22-59.0 W 0002633858 EPEC COMMUNICATIONS CORPORATIYazoo 05/31/2006 00928.14375 32-50-32.0 N MS NE 090-22-59.0 W 0002633858 EPEC COMMUNICATIONS CORPORATIYazoo 05/31/2006 00952.14375 32-50-32.0 N OR NE 124-03-13.0 W 0002634080 Central Lincoln Peoples Utility
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-265920A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-265920A1.txt
    • OF GREATER IOWA, INC. BLAIRSBURG 06/05/2006 06226.89000 42-28-29.0 N IA MD WMN280 093-35-22.0 W 0002639843 USCOC OF GREATER IOWA, INC. BLAIRSBURG 06/05/2006 06315.84000 42-28-29.0 N IA MD WMN280 093-35-22.0 W 0002639843 USCOC OF GREATER IOWA, INC. BLAIRSBURG 06/05/2006 06382.55000 42-28-29.0 N IA MD WMN280 093-35-22.0 W 0002639843 USCOC OF GREATER IOWA, INC. BLAIRSBURG 06/05/2006 06825.00000 42-28-29.0 N CA MD WPXG729 116-57-00.5 W 0002640080 LOS ANGELES SMSA LIMITED PARTNEHEMET 06/05/2006 10592.50000 33-43-16.0 N CA MD WPUC905 123-13-58.3 W 0002640187 Edge Wireless Licenses, LLC Ukiah 06/05/2006 17880.00000 39-07-00.0 N WI MD WPTJ598 090-57-40.6 W 0002640189 Wisconsin RSA No. 8 Limited Partnership Soldiers Grove 06/05/2006 05974.85000 43-25-05.1 N WI MD WPTJ598 090-57-40.6 W 0002640189 Wisconsin RSA No. 8 Limited Partnership Soldiers Grove 06/05/2006 06034.15000
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-266108A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-266108A1.txt
    • N CA NE 119-20-24.0 W 0002654514 Ventura County Office of Education Ventura 06/19/2006 23025.00000 34-20-57.0 N MO NE 094-22-01.8 W 0002654594 Mid America Regional Council EmergencyLee Summit 06/19/2006 17820.00000 38-56-50.8 N MO NE 094-22-01.8 W 0002654594 Mid America Regional Council EmergencyLee Summit 06/19/2006 17980.00000 38-56-50.8 N WA NE 121-34-42.1 W 0002655427 PUBLIC UTILITY DISTRICT NO. 1 OF SNINDEX 06/19/2006 00932.41875 47-50-00.5 N WA NE 121-34-42.1 W 0002655427 PUBLIC UTILITY DISTRICT NO. 1 OF SNINDEX 06/19/2006 00941.41875 47-50-00.5 N WA NE 120-28-28.2 W 0002655558 WASHINGTON, STATE OF; Department oUnion Gap 06/19/2006 23075.00000 46-33-34.5 N WA NE 120-28-28.2 W 0002655558 WASHINGTON, STATE OF; Department oUnion Gap 06/19/2006 23125.00000 46-33-34.5 N WA NE 120-32-42.2 W 0002655562 WASHINGTON, STATE OF; Department oSelah 06/19/2006 21875.00000 46-38-03.5
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-266245A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-266245A1.txt
    • Smoky Hill Cellular of Colorado Limited PaKit Carson 06/29/2006 05945.20000 38-47-08.5 N CA MD WQAW321 123-41-33.9 W 0002668188 JOHANNESEN, NORMAN A GARBERVILLE 06/29/2006 06093.45000 40-06-56.7 N CA MD WQAW321 123-41-33.9 W 0002668188 JOHANNESEN, NORMAN A GARBERVILLE 06/29/2006 06315.84000 40-06-56.7 N CO MD WMS705 103-13-52.0 W 0002668595 Smoky Hill Cellular of Colorado Limited PHUGO 06/30/2006 06197.24000 38-56-15.0 N FL MD WQFD403 082-34-00.5 W 0002668866 FIBERTOWER CORPORATION CITRUS PARK 06/30/2006 11325.00000 28-05-41.3 N FL MD WQFD403 082-34-00.5 W 0002668866 FIBERTOWER CORPORATION CITRUS PARK 06/30/2006 11405.00000 28-05-41.3 N NY MD WPSQ536 073-53-28.5 W 0002668936 MPX SCHENECTADY 06/30/2006 21925.00000 42-48-47.5 N OR MD WMW508 123-21-21.3 W 0002669461 USCOC Of Oregon RSA #5, Inc. SUTHERLIN 06/30/2006 06417.14000 43-22-18.4 N OR MD WMW508 123-21-21.3 W 0002669461 USCOC
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-266343A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-266343A1.txt
    • Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City NY NE 074-00-14.5 W 0002670845 AT&T CORP. NEW YORK 07/05/2006 18040.00000 40-42-45.4 N NE NE 097-36-07.9 W 0002671389 NE Colorado Wireless Technologies, Inc.Battle Creek 07/05/2006 05945.20000 41-59-22.2 N NE NE 097-36-07.9 W 0002671389 NE Colorado Wireless Technologies, Inc.Battle Creek 07/05/2006 06034.15000 41-59-22.2 N NE NE 097-50-00.5 W 0002671390 NE Colorado Wireless Technologies, Inc.Tilden 07/05/2006 06197.24000 42-02-11.0 N NY NE 076-09-22.2 W 0002671848 Syracuse SMSA Limited Partnership Clay 07/05/2006 05945.20000 43-11-05.1 N NY NE 076-09-22.2 W 0002671848 Syracuse SMSA Limited Partnership Clay 07/05/2006 06034.15000 43-11-05.1 N NY NE 076-09-22.2 W 0002671848 Syracuse SMSA Limited Partnership Clay 07/05/2006 06063.80000 43-11-05.1 N PR NE 065-41-10.0 W 0002672449 AWS License
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-266402A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-266402A1.txt
    • and other parameters of adjacent operations at a given position. o Reliance on coordination instead of rulemaking to permit short-spaced operations provides critical flexibility to accommodate technical innovations and new service offerings. Any rules proposed by the Commission concerning short-spaced DBS systems should address only basic technical parameters for operation. o Appropriate areas for regulation would include: antenna pointing accuracy (0.5 degrees, as proposed by DirecTV), adoption of an off-axis gain pattern, development of a methodology for calculating composite aggregate interference, criteria for spot beam edge of coverage, recognition of effects of frequency or polarization offsets, and limitations on flexibility to relocate satellites within a DBS cluster. EX PARTE OR LATE FILED KARIS A. HASTINGS COUNSEL (202) 037-5701 KAHASTINGS~~HHLAW. COM BY
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-266457A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-266457A1.txt
    • N CA MD WAV738 118-57-47.4 W 0002678692 Pacific Gas and Electric Company Auberry 07/10/2006 06675.62500 37-02-21.8 N CA MD WAV738 118-57-47.4 W 0002678692 Pacific Gas and Electric Company Auberry 07/10/2006 06840.00000 37-02-21.8 N Page 30 MG - Microwave Industrial/Business Pool State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City CA MD KMJ72 119-46-00.5 W 0002678693 Pacific Gas and Electric Company FRESNO 07/10/2006 06835.62500 36-43-09.8 N ND MD WAW915 098-42-18.4 W 0002679452 OTTER TAIL POWER COMPANY JAMESTOWN 07/11/2006 06590.62500 46-54-29.0 N ND MD WAT717 098-40-49.0 W 0002679453 OTTER TAIL POWER COMPANY JAMESTOWN 07/11/2006 00958.35000 47-01-48.0 N ND MD WAT717 098-40-49.0 W 0002679453 OTTER TAIL POWER COMPANY JAMESTOWN 07/11/2006 06750.62500 47-01-48.0 N ND MD WAT717
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-266596A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-266596A1.txt
    • 2001 Dec 2002 Dec 2003 Dec 2004 Dec 2005 One or More Providers Four or More Providers Technology Zero One Two Three Four Five Six Seven Eight Nine Ten or More ADSL 17.9 40.7 18.5 9.3 5.9 3.9 2.2 1.0 0.4 0.1 0.1 SDSL 54.4 19.8 7.8 5.2 3.9 3.3 2.8 1.7 0.8 0.2 0.1 Cable Modem 42.9 48.1 8.4 0.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Fiber 60.9 18.9 11.9 6.0 1.9 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Satellite 11.5 46.3 28.9 12.7 0.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Fixed Wireless 80.8 15.6 2.9 0.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Mobile Wireless 47.6 48.4 4.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Power Line and/or
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-266710A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-266710A1.txt
    • and Fixed State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City TX NE 097-04-43.9 W 0002692089 TSTC Waco airport waco 07/24/2006 00121.70000 31-38-20.8 N TX NE 097-04-43.9 W 0002692089 TSTC Waco airport waco 07/24/2006 00124.00000 31-38-20.8 N TX NE 097-04-43.9 W 0002692089 TSTC Waco airport waco 07/24/2006 00255.70000 31-38-20.8 N MO NE 091-54-00.5 W 0002692158 West Plains, City of Pomona 07/24/2006 00122.80000 36-52-40.2 N TX NE 097-30-01.0 W 0002692188 Mercury Air Group Inc. Corpus Christi 07/24/2006 00122.95000 27-46-07.1 N GA NE 084-25-29.7 W 0002692260 Dawson, City of Dawson 07/24/2006 00122.80000 31-44-45.6 N ID NE 116-13-48.4 W 0002692728 Jackson Jet Center Boise 07/25/2006 00122.95000 43-34-16.6 N IA NE 094-09-06.9 W 0002692780 Perry, City of
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-266720A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-266720A1.txt
    • Frequency City Latitude State Longitude Loc./ Path ## Ant. IG - Industrial/Business Pool, Conventional Public Safety & Critical Infrastructure Division 06/27/2006 KB83918 FB2 MANHEIM SERVICES CORP DBA BALTIMORE W 152.40500000 ELKRIDGE 39-12-0.4 N MD 76-41-58.9 W 2 1 06/27/2006 KB83918 MO MANHEIM SERVICES CORP DBA BALTIMORE W 157.66500000 -- -- 3 1 06/23/2006 KNBR935 FB2 LE TOURNEAU UNIVERSITY 452.26250000 LONGVIEW 32-30-0.5 N TX 94-43-20.8 W 2 1 06/23/2006 KNBR935 MO LE TOURNEAU UNIVERSITY 452.26250000 -- -- 4 1 06/23/2006 KNBR935 MO LE TOURNEAU UNIVERSITY 457.26250000 -- -- 4 1 06/27/2006 KQH735 FB2 AmerGen Energy Company, LLC 451.30000000 MIDDLETOWN 40-9-14.3 N PA 76-43-31.9 W 1 2 06/27/2006 KQH735 FB2 AmerGen Energy Company, LLC 452.12500000 MIDDLETOWN 40-9-14.3 N PA 76-43-31.9 W 1 2
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-266826A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-266826A1.txt
    • Latitude State Longitude Loc./ Path ## Ant. LN - 902-928 MHz Location Narrowband (Non-multilateration) Mobility Division 06/30/2006 WPZQ734 LR RALEIGH DURHAM AIRPORT AUTHORITY 916.50000000 RALEIGH 35-52-51.2 N NC 78-47-4.5 W 3 1 06/30/2006 WPZQ734 LR RALEIGH DURHAM AIRPORT AUTHORITY 914.00000000 RALEIGH 35-52-50.9 N NC 78-47-7.7 W 4 1 06/30/2006 WPZQ734 LR RALEIGH DURHAM AIRPORT AUTHORITY 912.50000000 RALEIGH 35-52-54.1 N NC 78-47-0.5 W 5 1 06/30/2006 WPZQ734 LR RALEIGH DURHAM AIRPORT AUTHORITY 913.50000000 RALEIGH 35-52-54.2 N NC 78-47-0.7 W 6 1 Call Sign Termination Date Stn Class Licensee Name Lower/Upper Frequency City Latitude State Longitude Loc./ Path ## Ant. PW - Public Safety Pool, Conventional Public Safety & Critical Infrastructure Division 07/01/2006 KNBD601 FB TAKOMA ADVENTIST HOSPITAL 155.34000000 GREENEVILLE 36-9-6.4 N TN
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-266991A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-266991A1.txt
    • the East LP Kathleen 08/17/2006 06785.00000 32-28-56.8 N Page 24 CF - Common Carrier Fixed Point to Point Microwave State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City CA NE 116-59-00.3 W 0002716923 T-MOBILE LICENSE LLC SANTEE 08/17/2006 19395.00000 32-50-11.9 N CA NE 117-24-00.6 W 0002716924 T-MOBILE LICENSE LLC GOLCONDA 08/17/2006 06402.32000 40-56-00.5 N CA NE 117-46-13.7 W 0002716925 T-MOBILE LICENSE LLC WINNEMUCCA 08/17/2006 06150.28000 41-00-30.1 N WA NE 121-48-47.0 W 0002716926 T-MOBILE LICENSE LLC CARSON 08/17/2006 19385.00000 45-43-22.0 N OR NE 121-43-23.0 W 0002716927 T-MOBILE LICENSE LLC HOOD RIVER 08/17/2006 17825.00000 45-38-54.4 N FL NE 082-04-31.9 W 0002717231 Trillion Partners, Inc. Port Charlotte 08/17/2006 19400.00000 27-00-04.5 N OR NE 121-20-58.8 W 0002717525
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-267135A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-267135A1.txt
    • 29-56-06.4 N CA NE 122-46-10.5 W 0002727376 Edge Wireless Licenses, LLC Kelseyville 08/25/2006 06675.62500 38-59-22.2 N CA NE 123-02-10.8 W 0002727377 Edge Wireless Licenses, LLC Upperlake 08/25/2006 10616.25000 39-11-29.0 N CA NE 123-58-22.0 W 0002727381 Edge Wireless Licenses, LLC EUREKA 08/25/2006 06635.00000 40-43-35.0 N CA NE 123-58-22.0 W 0002727381 Edge Wireless Licenses, LLC EUREKA 08/25/2006 11697.50000 40-43-35.0 N CA NE 123-44-00.5 W 0002727382 Edge Wireless Licenses, LLC Blue Lake 08/25/2006 06795.00000 40-52-27.0 N CA NE 123-44-00.5 W 0002727382 Edge Wireless Licenses, LLC Blue Lake 08/25/2006 19375.00000 40-52-27.0 N CA NE 123-37-20.4 W 0002727383 Edge WIreless Licenses, LLC Willow Creek 08/25/2006 17815.00000 40-58-10.8 N CA NE 120-38-26.0 W 0002727387 Edge Wireless Licenses, LLC Susanville 08/25/2006 06605.00000 40-25-03.0 N Page 16 CF -
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-267393A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-267393A1.txt
    • 40-36-10.2 N PA NE 078-42-56.0 W 0002734545 LAST MILE INC. dba STING COMMUNICCarrolltown 09/05/2006 10795.00000 40-36-10.2 N PA NE 078-44-15.0 W 0002734546 LAST MILE INC. dba STING COMMUNICEbensburg 09/05/2006 11285.00000 40-29-13.0 N PA NE 078-59-05.0 W 0002734547 LAST MILE INC. dba STING COMMUNICJOHNSTOWN 09/05/2006 10835.00000 40-22-16.0 N PA NE 078-50-26.0 W 0002734548 LAST MILE INC. dba STING COMMUNICWINBUR 09/05/2006 06256.54000 40-17-00.5 N PA NE 078-50-26.0 W 0002734548 LAST MILE INC. dba STING COMMUNICWINBUR 09/05/2006 11325.00000 40-17-00.5 N PA NE 079-07-45.2 W 0002734549 LAST MILE INC. dba STING COMMUNICJENNERSTOWN 09/05/2006 06004.50000 40-10-51.2 N PA NE 079-07-45.2 W 0002734549 LAST MILE INC. dba STING COMMUNICJENNERSTOWN 09/05/2006 10835.00000 40-10-51.2 N PA NE 079-03-44.2 W 0002734550 LAST MILE INC. dba STING COMMUNICSomerset 09/05/2006 11325.00000 40-00-54.5
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-267490A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-267490A1.txt
    • N OK MD WMP364 096-48-10.0 W 0002748725 USCOC OF GREATER OKLAHOMA, INCMADILL 09/12/2006 06745.00000 34-02-26.0 N OK MD WMP364 096-48-10.0 W 0002748725 USCOC OF GREATER OKLAHOMA, INCMADILL 09/12/2006 06765.00000 34-02-26.0 N OK MD WMP364 096-48-10.0 W 0002748725 USCOC OF GREATER OKLAHOMA, INCMADILL 09/12/2006 06805.00000 34-02-26.0 N CA MD WGW725 121-25-50.9 W 0002748838 Citizens Telecommunications Company ofFALL RIVER MILLS 09/12/2006 02121.60000 41-01-00.5 N Page 15 CF - Common Carrier Fixed Point to Point Microwave State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City CA MD WGW725 121-25-50.9 W 0002748838 Citizens Telecommunications Company ofFALL RIVER MILLS 09/12/2006 06110.75000 41-01-00.5 N NE MD WML227 102-52-44.7 W 0002748839 International Communications Group, Inc. BEREA 09/12/2006 11305.00000 42-11-35.8 N
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-267738A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-267738A1.txt
    • Partners, Inc. Sun Valley 09/26/2006 17840.00000 48-19-50.7 N ID NE 116-41-34.7 W 0002764916 Trillion Partners, Inc. Sun Valley 09/26/2006 23035.00000 48-19-50.7 N ID NE 116-41-34.7 W 0002764916 Trillion Partners, Inc. Sun Valley 09/26/2006 23085.00000 48-19-50.7 N ID NE 116-26-19.4 W 0002764917 Trillion Partners, Inc. Sandpoint 09/26/2006 21885.00000 48-21-52.2 N ID NE 116-15-50.7 W 0002764918 Trillion Partners, Inc. Hope 09/26/2006 19360.00000 48-13-00.5 N SC NE 080-25-25.1 W 0002764943 Conterra Ultra Broadband, LLC Holly Hill 09/26/2006 19320.00000 33-19-58.5 N SC NE 080-24-20.0 W 0002764959 Conterra Ultra Broadband, LLC Holly Hill 09/26/2006 19480.00000 33-19-30.0 N SC NE 080-24-20.0 W 0002764959 Conterra Ultra Broadband, LLC Holly Hill 09/26/2006 23175.00000 33-19-30.0 N SC NE 080-23-59.0 W 0002764966 Conterra Ultra Broadband, LLC Holly Hill 09/26/2006 23175.00000 33-19-15.0
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-267743A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-267743A1.txt
    • Macy's West 467.87500000 DEDEDO 13-30-55.0 N GU 144-50-10.0 E 8 1 08/25/2006 WPBA635 MO Macy's West 467.90000000 DEDEDO 13-30-55.0 N GU 144-50-10.0 E 8 1 08/25/2006 WPBA635 MO Macy's West 467.92500000 DEDEDO 13-30-55.0 N GU 144-50-10.0 E 8 1 08/25/2006 WPMQ968 MO COLUMBIA GAS TRANSMISSION CORP 456.26250000 -- -- 3 1 08/31/2006 WPXV830 MO BLACKWATER TRAINING CENTER INC 461.07500000 MOYOCK 36-27-0.5 N NC 76-12-58.7 W 3 1 08/31/2006 WPXV830 MO BLACKWATER TRAINING CENTER INC 461.27500000 MOYOCK 36-27-0.5 N NC 76-12-58.7 W 3 1 08/31/2006 WPXV830 MO BLACKWATER TRAINING CENTER INC 462.05000000 MOYOCK 36-27-0.5 N NC 76-12-58.7 W 3 1 08/31/2006 WPXV830 MO BLACKWATER TRAINING CENTER INC 463.45000000 MOYOCK 36-27-0.5 N NC 76-12-58.7 W 3 1 08/31/2006 WPXV830 MO BLACKWATER TRAINING CENTER
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-267826A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-267826A1.txt
    • 0002772895 OREGON RSA NO. 2 LIMITED PARTNERMURDOCK 10/03/2006 10795.00000 45-42-43.4 N WA MD WMW709 121-06-54.2 W 0002772895 OREGON RSA NO. 2 LIMITED PARTNERMURDOCK 10/03/2006 10955.00000 45-42-43.4 N WA MD WMW709 121-06-54.2 W 0002772895 OREGON RSA NO. 2 LIMITED PARTNERMURDOCK 10/03/2006 10995.00000 45-42-43.4 N MN MD WPNB280 093-52-25.9 W 0002772957 RCC Minnesota, Inc. DEERWOOD 10/03/2006 06315.84000 46-29-30.8 N VA MD WNTU954 075-45-00.5 W 0002773017 Conectiv Communications, Inc. ONANCOCK 10/03/2006 06595.00000 37-42-05.7 N WY MD KPB65 107-59-49.3 W 0002773031 International Communications Group, Inc. BONNEVILLE 10/03/2006 05945.20000 43-26-14.8 N MA MD WQFI692 071-14-12.0 W 0002773373 Towerstream Corp NEEDHAM 10/03/2006 19400.00000 42-18-37.0 N NE MD WPNL506 103-39-34.7 W 0002773463 International Communications Group, Inc. GERING 10/03/2006 17825.00000 41-49-12.8 N CA MD WMW272 123-47-51.0 W 0002773658 CALIFORNIA
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-267827A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-267827A1.txt
    • 075-30-09.7 W 0002773507 DELMARVA POWER AND LIGHT COMPASALISBURY 10/03/2006 00928.38125 38-17-40.8 N MD MD WNTK973 075-30-09.7 W 0002773507 DELMARVA POWER AND LIGHT COMPASALISBURY 10/03/2006 00952.38125 38-17-40.8 N VA MD WNTK974 075-34-15.2 W 0002773513 DELMARVA POWER AND LIGHT COMPAOAKHALL 10/03/2006 00928.70625 37-56-37.3 N VA MD WNTK974 075-34-15.2 W 0002773513 DELMARVA POWER AND LIGHT COMPAOAKHALL 10/03/2006 00952.70625 37-56-37.3 N VA MD WPJB480 075-45-00.5 W 0002773517 DELMARVA POWER AND LIGHT COMPAONANCOCK 10/03/2006 00928.53125 37-42-05.7 N VA MD WPJB480 075-45-00.5 W 0002773517 DELMARVA POWER AND LIGHT COMPAONANCOCK 10/03/2006 00952.53125 37-42-05.7 N MW - Microwave Public Safety Pool State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City CA MD WQEP360 119-01-19.3 W 0002771647 Ventura County Office of Education
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-267862A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-267862A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-267862A1.txt
    • population served by a TV/DTV station is de minimis and therefore acceptable. However, the FCC granted Qualcomm a limited waiver using a measured approach where the allowable predicted interference to a TV/DTV station's service caused by the MediaFLO system will increase incrementally each year from the release of today's Order until the end of the DTV transition in February 2009: 0.5 percent of the population within the TV/DTV station's Grade B contour for the first year, 1.0 percent for the second year, and 1.5 percent for the remainder of the DTV transition. Qualcomm is not permitted to cause new interference to any broadcast facility that is entitled to protection and either already experiences interference to 10 percent or more of its
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-268367A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-268367A1.txt
    • 10/30/2006 10795.00000 44-13-35.6 N MN NE 095-15-45.5 W 0002801801 Trillion Partners, Inc. Lamberton 10/30/2006 10875.00000 44-13-35.6 N MN NE 095-15-45.5 W 0002801801 Trillion Partners, Inc. Lamberton 10/30/2006 11445.00000 44-13-35.6 N MN NE 095-28-11.1 W 0002801802 Trillion Partners, Inc. Walnut Grove 10/30/2006 11245.00000 44-13-12.5 N MN NE 095-28-11.1 W 0002801802 Trillion Partners, Inc. Walnut Grove 10/30/2006 11365.00000 44-13-12.5 N MN NE 096-08-00.5 W 0002801803 Trillion Partners, Inc. Tyler 10/30/2006 10755.00000 44-16-55.7 N Page 18 CF - Common Carrier Fixed Point to Point Microwave State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City MN NE 096-08-00.5 W 0002801803 Trillion Partners, Inc. Tyler 10/30/2006 10795.00000 44-16-55.7 N MN NE 096-08-00.5 W 0002801803 Trillion Partners, Inc. Tyler
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-268426A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-268426A1.pdf
    • applicable to their particular service as set forth in this title and with a valid authorization granted by the Commission under the provisions of this part..." At the time of inspection, Salvamex's fixed base transmitter, which is authorized to operate at 193 South Broadway, Yonkers, NY, was found operating at 54 Van Cortlandt Pk Avenue, Yonkers, NY, which is approximately 0.5 miles away from the authorized location. In addition, at the time of inspection, the owner of Salvamex admitted to operating 90 mobile units on the frequency 159.840 MHz. Salvamex is authorized to operate only 25 mobile units on that frequency. 47 C.F.R. § 90.425(a): ``Except as provided for in paragraphs (d) and (e) of this section, each station or system
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-268926A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-268926A1.txt
    • CHESAPEAKE 12/04/2006 10995.00000 36-43-56.0 N VA NE 076-14-27.0 W 0002836962 Telecom Transport Management, Inc. CHESAPEAKE 12/04/2006 17990.00000 36-43-56.0 N VA NE 076-14-27.0 W 0002836962 Telecom Transport Management, Inc. CHESAPEAKE 12/04/2006 18050.00000 36-43-56.0 N VA NE 076-14-27.0 W 0002836962 Telecom Transport Management, Inc. CHESAPEAKE 12/04/2006 21980.00000 36-43-56.0 N VA NE 076-12-02.0 W 0002837316 Telecom Transport Management, Inc. Woods Corner 12/04/2006 19550.00000 36-47-00.5 N VA NE 076-12-02.0 W 0002837316 Telecom Transport Management, Inc. Woods Corner 12/04/2006 19650.00000 36-47-00.5 N NV NE 115-24-34.6 W 0002838238 Nextel of California, Inc. Las Vegas 12/05/2006 10573.12500 36-18-11.4 N NV NE 115-34-18.3 W 0002838283 Nextel of California, Inc. Indian Springs 12/05/2006 10638.12500 36-19-15.5 N PR NE 066-09-49.9 W 0002838384 AWS License Newco, LLC BAYAMON 12/05/2006 17795.00000 18-25-26.6 N
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269139A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269139A1.txt
    • "permit-but-disclose" under the Commission's rules governing ex parte communications. See Public Notice, Actions Taken (Report No. SAT-00409, released December 22, 2006). SAT-STA-20061211-00147E Special Temporary Authority 12/11/2006 14:50:44:75300 Date Filed: XM Radio Inc. On December 11, 2006, XM Radio Inc. (XM) requested special temporary authority (STA), for a period of 180 days, to operate repeaters with power levels of up to 0.5 watts equivalent isotropically radiated power (EIRP) and 0.0001 watts EIRP at trade shows in various cities as set forth in Exhibit A to the request. XM states the repeaters are necessary to provide quality reception inside trade show venues, due to signal blockage from walls and ceilings. This proceeding has been designated as "permit-but-disclose" under the Commission's rules governing ex
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269191A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269191A1.txt
    • MG - Microwave Industrial/Business Pool State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City FL NE 082-13-04.7 W 0002854188 M/A-COM, INC. LOWELL 12/19/2006 06650.00000 29-20-51.4 N FL NE 084-58-49.0 W 0002854189 M/A-COM, INC. SNEADS 12/19/2006 06820.00000 30-38-21.0 N FL NE 081-52-14.0 W 0002854190 M/A-COM, INC. HILLIARD 12/19/2006 06680.00000 30-38-55.0 N FL NE 082-45-00.5 W 0002854191 M/A-COM, INC. Fort White 12/19/2006 05974.85000 29-58-42.6 N FL NE 082-45-00.5 W 0002854191 M/A-COM, INC. Fort White 12/19/2006 06093.45000 29-58-42.6 N FL NE 082-45-00.5 W 0002854191 M/A-COM, INC. Fort White 12/19/2006 06610.00000 29-58-42.6 N FL NE 080-20-15.0 W 0002854193 M/A-COM, INC. FORT PIERCE 12/19/2006 06197.24000 27-23-34.0 N FL NE 080-20-15.0 W 0002854193 M/A-COM, INC. FORT PIERCE 12/19/2006 06700.00000
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A1.txt
    • Support 126 183 500 602 757 915 10281072113211881263169017182235259229353259346838243993 19871988198919901991199219931994199519961997199819992000200120022003200420052006 3 - 13 YearCompaniesHigh-Cost Loop Support Safety Net Additive Support Safety Valve Support High-Cost Model Support Long- Term Support Interstate Common Line Support Interstate Access Support Local Switching Support Total Support ILECs 864.2 - - - 472.9 - - 380.3 1,717.4 1999 CETCs 0.1 - - - 0.4 - - 0.0 0.5 Total 864.3 - - - 473.3 - - 380.3 1,718.0 ILECs 873.8 - - 218.7 477.3 - 278.8 384.7 2,233.3 2000 CETCs 0.4 - - 0.0 1.1 - 0.0 0.0 1.5 Total 874.1 - - 218.7 478.4 - 278.8 384.7 2,234.8 ILECs 921.5 - - 205.4 484.2 - 575.7 387.9 2,574.7 2001 CETCs 5.7 - - 0.3 8.0 - 1.0
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A11.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A11.txt
    • 2.8 2.8 0.4 6.0 1.3 Outage Line-Minutes per Event in Thousands 1,557.9 NA NA 320.2 71.9 67.7 2,147.6 907.8 Outage Line-Minutes per 1,000 Access Lines 47,907.2 0.0 0.0 3,590.0 261.1 4,342.4 53,197.5 53,325.3 For Scheduled Downtime More Than 2 Minutes Number of Occurrences or Events 0 0 0 1 0 0 6 0 Events per Hundred Switches 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.5 0.0 0.0 0.4 0.0 Events per Million Access Lines 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.80 0.00 0.00 0.83 0.00 Average Outage Duration in Minutes NA NA NA 6.0 NA NA 364.7 NA Avg. Lines Affected per Event in Thousands NA NA NA 20.9 NA NA 7.0 NA Outage Line-Minutes per Event in Thousands NA NA NA 125.6 NA NA 3390.8 NA Outage
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A5.txt
    • Support 126 183 500 602 757 915 10281072113211881263169017182235259229353259346838243993 19871988198919901991199219931994199519961997199819992000200120022003200420052006 3 - 13 YearCompaniesHigh-Cost Loop Support Safety Net Additive Support Safety Valve Support High-Cost Model Support Long- Term Support Interstate Common Line Support Interstate Access Support Local Switching Support Total Support ILECs 864.2 - - - 472.9 - - 380.3 1,717.4 1999 CETCs 0.1 - - - 0.4 - - 0.0 0.5 Total 864.3 - - - 473.3 - - 380.3 1,718.0 ILECs 873.8 - - 218.7 477.3 - 278.8 384.7 2,233.3 2000 CETCs 0.4 - - 0.0 1.1 - 0.0 0.0 1.5 Total 874.1 - - 218.7 478.4 - 278.8 384.7 2,234.8 ILECs 921.5 - - 205.4 484.2 - 575.7 387.9 2,574.7 2001 CETCs 5.7 - - 0.3 8.0 - 1.0
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A9.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A9.txt
    • 15.6 14.6 15.9 6.2 8.0 1982 10.8 9.0 2.7 3.9 4.2 1.7 1983 3.1 0.2 1.4 0.0 7.4 3.9 1984 17.2 10.4 -4.3 -5.1 3.6 3.8 1985 8.9 12.4 -3.7 -3.0 0.6 2.1 1986 7.1 8.9 -9.4 -10.0 0.3 -3.5 1987 3.3 2.6 -12.4 -11.8 -3.0 -3.0 1988 4.5 4.6 -4.2 -2.1 -4.2 -3.8 1989 0.6 1.9 -1.3 -1.7 -2.6 0.5 1990 1.0 1.5 -3.7 -0.1 -2.2 -2.2 1991 5.1 2.1 1.3 -1.3 -1.5 -2.6 1992 0.5 -0.2 -1.3 1.0 -2.4 1.3 1993 1.0 0.8 6.5 3.8 0.2 -1.1 1994 -0.3 0.7 5.4 6.1 -1.0 -1.4 1995 2.6 ** 0.1 ** -3.8 ** 1996 0.9 0.2 3.7 0.8 6.1 0.9 1997 1.0 0.1 -4.3 7.8 2.8 -4.3 1998 1.3 0.0 -0.8
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269297A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269297A1.txt
    • 30-59-32.6 N LA MD WAH538 090-42-22.3 W 0002861290 Bell Atlantic Mobile Systems of Allentown,Greensburg 12/26/2006 06152.75000 30-59-32.6 N MO MD WLV518 091-31-33.8 W 0002861305 Cellco Partnership DANVILLE 12/26/2006 06226.89000 38-55-26.0 N MO MD WLV518 091-31-33.8 W 0002861305 Cellco Partnership DANVILLE 12/26/2006 06286.19000 38-55-26.0 N MO MD WLV522 091-59-24.0 W 0002861352 Cellco Partnership FULTON 12/26/2006 06034.15000 38-54-30.0 N MO MD WLV514 091-11-00.5 W 0002861379 Cellco Partnership WARRENTON 12/26/2006 05974.85000 38-49-23.1 N LA MD WAH539 090-54-31.4 W 0002862206 Bell Atlantic Mobile Systems of Allentown,CLINTON 12/27/2006 06197.24000 30-52-58.7 N LA MD WAH539 090-54-31.4 W 0002862206 Bell Atlantic Mobile Systems of Allentown,CLINTON 12/27/2006 06226.89000 30-52-58.7 N LA MD WAH539 090-54-31.4 W 0002862206 Bell Atlantic Mobile Systems of Allentown,CLINTON 12/27/2006 06256.50000 30-52-58.7 N LA MD WAH539
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269691A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269691A1.txt
    • Carrier Fixed Point to Point Microwave State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City NC NE 080-05-15.0 W 0002883729 Conterra Ultra Broadband Thomasville 01/19/2007 19320.00000 35-47-52.9 N NC NE 080-05-15.0 W 0002883729 Conterra Ultra Broadband Thomasville 01/19/2007 19680.00000 35-47-52.9 N NC NE 080-06-05.7 W 0002883761 Conterra Ultra Broadband Lexington 01/19/2007 17760.00000 35-44-00.5 N NC NE 080-06-06.5 W 0002883766 Conterra Ultra Broadband Thomasville 01/19/2007 21875.00000 35-51-01.2 N NC NE 080-16-34.8 W 0002883779 Conterra Ultra Broadband Winston Salem 01/19/2007 18040.00000 35-59-32.6 N NC NE 080-08-28.3 W 0002883795 Conterra Ultra Broadband Winston Salem 01/19/2007 17960.00000 36-00-29.0 N NC NE 080-08-02.5 W 0002883850 Conterra Ultra Broadband Thomasville 01/19/2007 17880.00000 35-57-48.9 N NC NE 080-08-02.5 W 0002883850
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-270407A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-270407A1.txt
    • 61.8% Internet Access 18.6% 26.2% 41.5% 50.5% 54.6% High-Speed Access 4.4% 9.1% 19.9% Oct 1997 Dec 1998 Aug 2000 Sept 2001 Oct 2003 2 - 12 Internet Service 54.1% 54.8% 54.6% Dial-Up Service 40.4 32.3 34.3 High-Speed Service 13.2 21.8 19.9 Cable Modem 7.7 12.4 11.2 DSL 5.0 9.4 8.3 Satellite and Fixed Wireless (MMDS1) 0.6 0.3 0.4 Other 0.4 0.5 0.4 Source: A Nation Online: Entering the Broadband Age,September 2004, U.S. Department of Commerce, Economics and Statistics Administration (ESA), National Telecommunications and Information Administration (NTIA), and U.S. Census Bureau 1 MMDS - Multi-Media Distribution Systems. Table 2.9 Percent of U.S. Households with Internet Connections by Technology Rural versus Urban Rural Urban Total (As of October 2003) (As of October 2003)
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-270855A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-270855A1.txt
    • Percent Residential Installation Commitments Met Large Price-Cap Carriers 97.0 97.5 98.0 98.5 99.0 99.5 100.0 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 Years Percent o f Co mmitments M et Weighted BOC/Sprint Composite* Weighted Verizon Avg. BellSouth Weighted AT&T Avg. Qwest 17 ARMIS 43-05 Report 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 BellSouth 1.3 1.2 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.3 Qwest 1.0 0.6 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.3 AT&T Ameritech 2.1 2.0 2.1 1.5 1.4 1.4 AT&T Pacific 1.8 1.3 1.2 1.5 1.6 1.5 AT&T Southwestern 0.8 2.2 1.8 1.9 2.0 2.1 AT&T SNET 2.2 1.8 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Verizon GTE 1.0 0.8 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.9 Verizon North (Combined with Verizon South) Verizon South 1.5 1.1 1.0 1.1 1.1 1.0 Sprint 3.9 3.2
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-270881A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-270881A1.txt
    • MD WMN207 122-05-42.7 W 0002923651 NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS PCS, LLCRED BLUFF 02/23/2007 06063.80000 40-15-45.4 N CA MD WMN207 122-05-42.7 W 0002923651 NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS PCS, LLCRED BLUFF 02/23/2007 06165.10000 40-15-45.4 N CA MD WMN207 122-05-42.7 W 0002923651 NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS PCS, LLCRED BLUFF 02/23/2007 10623.75000 40-15-45.4 N CA MD WMR238 122-17-58.6 W 0002923673 NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS PCS, LLCANDERSON 02/23/2007 10558.75000 40-26-00.5 N CA MD WPJA740 121-48-32.2 W 0002923687 NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS PCS, LLCCHICO 02/23/2007 06034.15000 39-42-49.7 N CA MD WPJA740 121-48-32.2 W 0002923687 NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS PCS, LLCCHICO 02/23/2007 06063.80000 39-42-49.7 N CA MD WMR905 121-37-03.4 W 0002923707 NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS PCS, LLCTEHAMA 02/23/2007 06417.14000 40-17-56.9 N MD NE 076-30-36.3 W 0002916664 AirBand Communications, Inc. Parkville 02/20/2007 19460.00000 39-23-34.0 N CA
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-271465A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-271465A1.txt
    • HAVASU 03/06/2007 00943.17500 34-36-08.0 N AZ NE 113-54-17.8 W 0002936751 MOHAVE COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICEKINGMAN 03/06/2007 00934.17500 35-04-52.0 N AZ NE 113-54-17.8 W 0002936751 MOHAVE COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICEKINGMAN 03/06/2007 00934.37500 35-04-52.0 N AZ NE 114-19-05.0 W 0002936752 MOHAVE COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICELake Havasu City 03/06/2007 00933.77500 34-28-42.1 N UT NE 111-46-30.7 W 0002936948 University of Utah - Utah Education NetwoHighland 03/06/2007 21830.00000 40-25-00.5 N Page 4 MW - Microwave Public Safety Pool State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City UT NE 111-47-26.0 W 0002936974 University of Utah - Utah Education NetwoHighland 03/06/2007 23030.00000 40-25-09.8 N CA NE 116-56-51.3 W 0002940816 Sweetwater Union High School District Chula Vista 03/08/2007 23135.00000 32-39-17.6 N CA NE
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-271635A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-271635A1.txt
    • 119-45-06.2 W 0002951793 NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS PCS, LLCCARUTHERS 03/16/2007 06073.68000 36-32-44.6 N CA AM WLN693 119-45-06.2 W 0002951793 NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS PCS, LLCCARUTHERS 03/16/2007 06655.00000 36-32-44.6 N CA AM WLN693 119-45-06.2 W 0002951793 NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS PCS, LLCCARUTHERS 03/16/2007 06755.00000 36-32-44.6 N OR MD WMN440 123-56-19.4 W 0002944339 Verizon Wireless (VAW) LLC SEASIDE 03/12/2007 06805.00000 45-57-08.3 N OR MD WMN740 123-49-00.5 W 0002944343 Verizon Wireless (VAW) LLC ASTORIA 03/12/2007 06645.00000 46-10-53.3 N NY MD WQGI541 073-50-42.8 W 0002944633 Cellco Partnership Ballston 03/12/2007 06226.89000 42-58-17.4 N NY MD WQGI541 073-50-42.8 W 0002944633 Cellco Partnership Ballston 03/12/2007 06286.19000 42-58-17.4 N NY MD WQGI541 073-50-42.8 W 0002944633 Cellco Partnership Ballston 03/12/2007 06345.49000 42-58-17.4 N NY MD WQGI541 073-50-42.8 W 0002944633 Cellco Partnership Ballston 03/12/2007
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-271812A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-271812A1.txt
    • N AZ MD WPWZ458 112-56-48.1 W 0002961408 BNSF Railway Company Seligman 03/22/2007 06765.00000 35-21-26.5 N AZ MD WPWZ458 112-56-48.1 W 0002961408 BNSF Railway Company Seligman 03/22/2007 06815.00000 35-21-26.5 N AZ MD WPWZ458 112-56-48.1 W 0002961408 BNSF Railway Company Seligman 03/22/2007 11215.00000 35-21-26.5 N AZ MD WPWZ458 112-56-48.1 W 0002961408 BNSF Railway Company Seligman 03/22/2007 11365.00000 35-21-26.5 N MD MD WQGP546 077-12-00.5 W 0002963727 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS II GAITHERSBURG 03/23/2007 11365.00000 39-09-01.4 N MD MD WQGP546 077-12-00.5 W 0002963727 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS II GAITHERSBURG 03/23/2007 23025.00000 39-09-01.4 N TX MD WHI210 098-15-44.3 W 0002963731 LOWER COLORADO RIVER AUTHORITYBURNET 03/23/2007 01985.00000 30-49-41.1 N Page 39 MG - Microwave Industrial/Business Pool State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz)
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-272066A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-272066A1.txt
    • CITY OF RIDGEFIELD RIDGEFIELD 03/26/2007 00952.75625 45-47-25.8 N PA NE P 075-48-00.0 W 0002966731 JIM THORPE WATER ECKLEY 03/26/2007 00956.26875 41-01-01.5 N WI NE P 088-01-44.0 W 0002966752 VILLAGE OF LAKE VILLA BRISTOL 03/26/2007 00952.33125 42-33-09.6 N TX NE 097-19-50.6 W 0002967960 RedMoon Inc Fort Worth 03/26/2007 10795.00000 32-45-11.3 N TX NE 097-19-34.1 W 0002967971 RedMoon, Inc BURLESON 03/26/2007 11285.00000 32-31-00.5 N MI NE P 084-23-53.9 W 0002968273 VILLAGE OF OVID OVID 03/27/2007 00956.39375 43-00-18.4 N WI NE P 089-09-04.3 W 0002968279 CITY OF ANTIGO ANITGO 03/27/2007 00956.33125 45-08-29.8 N CO NE P 106-59-37.0 W 0002968297 PAGOSA AREA WATER & SAN DISTRICPAGOSA SPRINGS 03/27/2007 00956.41875 37-14-50.0 N Page 27 MG - Microwave Industrial/Business Pool State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op.
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-272240A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-272240A1.txt
    • 30-09-01.7 N FL NE 081-38-05.1 W 0002976658 JEA Jacksonville 04/02/2007 00952.59375 30-09-01.7 N FL NE 081-34-02.0 W 0002976720 JEA JACKSONVILLE 04/02/2007 00928.03125 30-21-06.0 N FL NE 081-34-02.0 W 0002976720 JEA JACKSONVILLE 04/02/2007 00952.03125 30-21-06.0 N NC NE P 078-07-58.1 W 0002976751 TOWN OF OAK ISLAND OAK ISLAND 04/02/2007 00956.41875 33-54-55.4 N FL NE 081-50-02.1 W 0002978186 JEA JACKSONVILLE 04/03/2007 00928.49375 30-15-00.5 N FL NE 081-50-02.1 W 0002978186 JEA JACKSONVILLE 04/03/2007 00952.49375 30-15-00.5 N IL NE P 090-12-19.1 W 0002978279 CITY OF COLUMBIA COLUMBIA 04/03/2007 00956.33125 38-26-41.3 N WI NE P 092-29-46.3 W 0002978292 STILLWATER BOARD OF WATER COMMNEW RICHMOND 04/03/2007 00956.40625 45-06-54.3 N Page 43 MG - Microwave Industrial/Business Pool State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-272241A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-272241A1.txt
    • 0002984080 VERMONT, STATE OF SAINT ALBANS 04/06/2007 06152.75000 44-48-08.2 N VT MD WIS90 073-03-01.5 W 0002984080 VERMONT, STATE OF SAINT ALBANS 04/06/2007 10593.12500 44-48-08.2 N VT MD WIS91 073-03-54.8 W 0002984082 VERMONT, STATE OF SAINT ALBANS 04/06/2007 10658.12500 44-48-34.2 N WA MD WNTY295 122-11-51.4 W 0002984278 PUBLIC UTILITY DISTRICT NO 1 OF SNEVERETT 04/06/2007 06093.45000 47-58-48.3 N WA MD KXK24 122-11-00.5 W 0002984279 PUBLIC UTILITY DISTRICT NO 1 OF SNARLINGTON 04/06/2007 06585.00000 48-12-09.4 N WA MD KXK24 122-11-00.5 W 0002984279 PUBLIC UTILITY DISTRICT NO 1 OF SNARLINGTON 04/06/2007 06855.00000 48-12-09.4 N CA MD KMK67 118-57-51.3 W 0002984345 KERN, COUNTY OF BAKERSFIELD 04/06/2007 18062.50000 35-24-41.8 N CA MD KMK67 118-57-51.3 W 0002984345 KERN, COUNTY OF BAKERSFIELD 04/06/2007 18082.50000 35-24-41.8 N CA MD
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-272248A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-272248A1.txt
    • Inc. 861.93750000 OAKLAND 37-48-20.7 N CA 122-16-25.9 W 2 1 03/07/2007 WQGG651 FB6C Logo Acquisition Corporation 861.91250000 ORLAND TOW 41-35-17.1 N IL 87-51-51.2 W 2 1 Call Sign Termination Date Stn Class Licensee Name Lower/Upper Frequency City Latitude State Longitude Loc./ Path ## Ant. IG - Industrial/Business Pool, Conventional Mobility Division 03/06/2007 WPPC597 FB2 LaFARGE BUILDING MATERIALS INC 462.43750000 RAVENA 42-30-0.5 N NY 73-48-43.5 W 2 1 03/06/2007 WPPC597 MO LaFARGE BUILDING MATERIALS INC 467.43750000 -- -- 3 1 03/02/2007 WPZH844 MO Wasco Union Elementary School 453.00000000 WASCO 35-35-45.0 N CA 119-20-23.0 W 5 1 03/02/2007 WPZH844 MO Wasco Union Elementary School 461.70000000 WASCO 35-35-45.0 N CA 119-20-23.0 W 5 1 03/02/2007 WPZH844 MO Wasco Union Elementary School 461.97500000 WASCO 35-35-45.0
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-272545A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-272545A2.txt
    • 0.077.110.5 12.0 Iceland $3,001,848 3.9 0.024.722.6 48.8 $286,192 0.0 0.018.622.4 59.0 $633 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0100.0 32,771,878 2.5 0.027.525.0 45.0 Ireland $44,072,784 6.6 0.122.225.5 45.6 $5,536,092 2.9 0.029.814.8 52.5 $4,134,615 99.9 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 477,165,748 6.8 0.121.923.9 47.4 Italy $132,786,542 2.8 0.031.114.3 51.7 $8,640,532 0.8 0.037.519.9 41.8 $12,753,395 99.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.3 1,258,138,243 2.7 0.032.316.3 48.7 Liechtenstein $2,777,434 0.5 2.625.513.6 57.9 $6,265 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0100.0 $710 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0100.0 5,929,750 1.0 3.128.124.7 43.1 Luxembourg $3,483,601 0.8 0.020.919.6 58.7 $164,671 0.6 0.023.119.8 56.5 $57,897 98.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.6 35,632,116 1.6 0.012.232.8 53.4 Malta $1,010,356 6.0 0.5 9.621.9 62.0 $93,865 0.0 0.0 0.017.4 82.6 $430 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 99.8 8,175,730 4.4 0.2 6.232.5 56.6 Netherlands $46,126,097 1.4
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-272904A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-272904A1.txt
    • Florida 85.5 92.0 6.4 * Georgia 88.9 89.7 0.8 Hawaii 94.6 94.6 0.0 Idaho 89.5 94.7 5.2 * Illinois 95.0 90.4 -4.6 Indiana 90.3 88.5 -1.8 Iowa 95.4 96.7 1.3 Kansas 94.9 94.5 -0.4 Kentucky 86.9 92.0 5.1 * Louisiana 88.9 94.9 6.0 * Maine 90.7 95.8 5.1 * Maryland 96.3 95.2 -1.0 Massachusetts 94.3 95.5 1.2 Michigan 93.8 94.3 0.5 Minnesota 96.4 98.0 1.6 Mississippi 82.4 90.7 8.3 * Missouri 92.1 95.4 3.3 * Montana 92.8 93.3 0.6 Nebraska 94.0 92.5 -1.5 Nevada 89.4 93.5 4.1 * New Hampshire 95.0 96.7 1.7 New Jersey 94.1 95.7 1.5 New Mexico 85.3 89.4 4.1 * New York 90.8 91.3 0.5 North Carolina 89.3 93.0 3.7 * North Dakota 95.1 96.9 1.8 Ohio
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-272911A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-272911A1.txt
    • T-MOBILE LICENSE LLC BAKERSFIELD 05/01/2007 19405.00000 35-26-56.1 N CA NE 120-19-52.0 W 0003012545 T-MOBILE LICENSE LLC Shandon 05/01/2007 19622.50000 35-41-14.4 N NM NE 105-56-55.3 W 0003013527 New Mexico RSA 6-I Partnership ALAMOGORDO 05/01/2007 21270.00000 32-53-43.6 N WA NE 123-21-36.9 W 0003013573 NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS PCS, LLCCATHLAMET 05/01/2007 06810.00000 46-12-03.4 N NY NE 073-55-26.6 W 0003013790 AT&T CORP. BRONX 05/02/2007 17755.00000 40-49-00.5 N NY NE 073-53-26.6 W 0003013791 AT&T CORP. EAST ELMHURST 05/02/2007 19315.00000 40-47-42.3 N KS NE 094-39-20.9 W 0003013974 Sprint Spectrum L.P. Overland Park 05/02/2007 23025.00000 38-54-53.4 N Page 20 CF - Common Carrier Fixed Point to Point Microwave State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City KS NE 094-39-22.3 W
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-273170A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-273170A1.txt
    • W 0003027815 WWC Holding Co., Inc. PUEBLO 05/14/2007 06197.24000 38-16-25.0 N CO MD WPNC707 104-20-21.0 W 0003027815 WWC Holding Co., Inc. PUEBLO 05/14/2007 06286.19000 38-16-25.0 N CO MD WPNC707 104-20-21.0 W 0003027815 WWC Holding Co., Inc. PUEBLO 05/14/2007 06345.49000 38-16-25.0 N MI MD WQFJ358 083-14-35.9 W 0003027843 FiberTower Network Services Corp. AUBURN HILLS 05/14/2007 19620.00000 42-41-26.9 N AZ MD WMR827 112-07-00.5 W 0003027875 Verizon Wireless (VAW) LLC COTTONWOOD 05/14/2007 10955.00000 34-42-06.0 N CA MD WPRW302 118-10-17.4 W 0003027928 NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS PCS, LLCRosamond 05/14/2007 06860.00000 34-49-39.4 N CA MD WPQX999 118-08-40.8 W 0003027941 NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS PCS, LLCPalmdale 05/14/2007 06286.19000 34-31-48.9 N CA MD WPQX999 118-08-40.8 W 0003027941 NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS PCS, LLCPalmdale 05/14/2007 06315.84000 34-31-48.9 N CA MD WPQX999 118-08-40.8
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-273340A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-273340A1.txt
    • N CA AM WLT432 117-54-34.2 W 0003039338 LOS ANGELES SMSA LIMITED PARTNESANTA ANA 05/23/2007 17880.00000 33-42-56.1 N CA AM WLT432 117-54-34.2 W 0003039338 LOS ANGELES SMSA LIMITED PARTNESANTA ANA 05/23/2007 17920.00000 33-42-56.1 N MD WPOT756 0002982914 RCC Minnesota, Inc. 04/06/2007 MD WPOT757 0002982923 RCC Minnesota, Inc. 04/06/2007 WV MD WPJF791 080-22-14.4 W 0003031957 HARDY CELLULAR TELEPHONE COMPLOST CREEK 05/17/2007 06417.14000 39-08-00.5 N WV MD WPJF791 080-22-14.4 W 0003031957 HARDY CELLULAR TELEPHONE COMPLOST CREEK 05/17/2007 06625.00000 39-08-00.5 N WV MD WPJF791 080-22-14.4 W 0003031957 HARDY CELLULAR TELEPHONE COMPLOST CREEK 05/17/2007 11622.50000 39-08-00.5 N TX MD WMP341 098-12-25.0 W 0003035064 TEXAHOMA CELLULAR LIMITED PARTNBLUEGROVE 05/21/2007 02171.60000 33-42-00.0 N TX MD WMP341 098-12-25.0 W 0003035064 TEXAHOMA CELLULAR LIMITED PARTNBLUEGROVE 05/21/2007 06745.00000 33-42-00.0 N TX
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-274572A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-274572A1.txt
    • 120-47-37.3 W 0003083659 WESTERN SUB-RSA LIMITED PARTNERCLE ELUM 06/22/2007 10552.50000 47-09-21.4 N WA MD WPQN660 120-54-50.4 W 0003083691 Hood River Cellular Telephone Company,GOLDENDALE 06/22/2007 06286.19000 45-40-46.9 N WA MD WPQN660 120-54-50.4 W 0003083691 Hood River Cellular Telephone Company,GOLDENDALE 06/22/2007 06815.00000 45-40-46.9 N WA MD WPQN660 120-54-50.4 W 0003083691 Hood River Cellular Telephone Company,GOLDENDALE 06/22/2007 06845.00000 45-40-46.9 N NY MD WQGY741 073-52-00.5 W 0003083697 FiberTower Network Services Corp. Rego Park 06/22/2007 17900.00000 40-43-21.4 N NY MD WQGY741 073-52-00.5 W 0003083697 FiberTower Network Services Corp. Rego Park 06/22/2007 21920.00000 40-43-21.4 N WA MD WMQ370 119-10-03.0 W 0003083760 USCOC OF RICHLAND, INC. KENNEWICK 06/22/2007 11365.00000 46-12-54.0 N WA MD WMQ370 119-10-03.0 W 0003083760 USCOC OF RICHLAND, INC. KENNEWICK 06/22/2007 11565.00000 46-12-54.0 N CA MD
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-274573A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-274573A1.txt
    • WPJC387 112-04-38.5 W 0002968754 PHOENIX, CITY OF PHOENIX 06/21/2007 17760.00000 33-26-55.1 N NY AM WQDY639 073-59-05.1 W 0002992813 NEW YORK, CITY OF Brooklyn 06/19/2007 10622.50000 40-41-42.8 N MA MD WNTW535 072-21-13.3 W 0003073332 Franklin Regional Council of GovernmentsWARWICK 06/15/2007 06801.25000 42-41-27.3 N MA MD WNTW535 072-21-13.3 W 0003073332 Franklin Regional Council of GovernmentsWARWICK 06/15/2007 10616.25000 42-41-27.3 N AZ MD KOK44 112-04-00.5 W 0003075614 ARIZONA, STATE OF PHOENIX 06/18/2007 11485.00000 33-19-57.1 N Page 1 MW - Microwave Public Safety Pool State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City FL MD WQEJ252 082-20-09.6 W 0003075731 Hillsborough County Tax Collector Tampa 06/18/2007 06004.50000 27-57-54.3 N CA MD WJY89 118-22-34.9 W 0003076937 Los Angeles, County of
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-274855A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-274855A1.txt
    • City RO KPI8 0003090913 EL PASO AERO INC 06/27/2007 RO WFW6 0003091658 SKY RANCH OWNERS ASSOCIATION 06/27/2007 RO WPVX346 0003092661 MURPHY EXPLORATION & PRODUCTIO 06/22/2007 AI - Aural Intercity Relay State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City VA MD WLO330 080-00-57.1 W 0003092480 CAPSTAR TX LIMITED PARTNERSHIPBOONES MILL 06/28/2007 00948.00000 37-07-00.5 N SD NE 103-50-07.7 W 0003092830 MICHAEL RADIO GROUP Lead 06/28/2007 00945.50000 44-19-39.9 N AS - Aural Studio Transmitter Link State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City GA MD WLG784 083-31-41.1 W 0003086592 THREE TREES COMMUNICATIONS, INCTifton 06/26/2007 00944.87500 31-27-36.6 N GA MD WLG784 083-31-41.1 W 0003086592 THREE TREES COMMUNICATIONS,
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-275038A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-275038A1.txt
    • N MA MD WMQ477 070-55-51.7 W 0003096464 CELLCO PARTNERSHIP EAST FREETOWN 07/03/2007 10617.50000 41-46-34.3 N MA MD WMQ477 070-55-51.7 W 0003096464 CELLCO PARTNERSHIP EAST FREETOWN 07/03/2007 10618.75000 41-46-34.3 N MA MD WMQ477 070-55-51.7 W 0003096464 CELLCO PARTNERSHIP EAST FREETOWN 07/03/2007 10622.50000 41-46-34.3 N MA MD WMQ477 070-55-51.7 W 0003096464 CELLCO PARTNERSHIP EAST FREETOWN 07/03/2007 10755.00000 41-46-34.3 N CA MD WMQ821 119-41-00.5 W 0003096650 CALIFORNIA RSA NO. 4 LIMITED PARTNOAKHURST 07/03/2007 06402.32000 37-18-50.8 N Page 8 CF - Common Carrier Fixed Point to Point Microwave State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City CA MD WLR388 120-02-02.5 W 0003096717 CALIFORNIA RSA NO. 4 LIMITED PARTNMADERA 07/03/2007 06150.28000 36-57-21.8 N MA MD WMQ478 070-48-25.1
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-275289A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-275289A1.txt
    • Point Microwave State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City UT NE 109-51-35.6 W 0003106450 CommNet Cellular License Holding LLC Cisco 07/11/2007 06150.28000 38-56-41.9 N CA NE 122-19-17.0 W 0003106836 T-MOBILE LICENSE LLC RICHMOND 07/11/2007 17825.00000 37-55-38.3 N CA NE 122-18-03.7 W 0003106839 T-MOBILE LICENSE LLC WEST CONTRA CO 07/11/2007 19385.00000 37-55-00.5 N NH NE 071-27-58.5 W 0003106841 FiberTower Network Services Corp. Manchester 07/11/2007 21975.00000 43-00-13.6 N MA NE 071-06-17.8 W 0003106960 FiberTower Network Services Corp. Taunton 07/11/2007 10755.00000 41-54-26.0 N MA NE 071-06-17.8 W 0003106960 FiberTower Network Services Corp. Taunton 07/11/2007 10795.00000 41-54-26.0 N MA NE 071-06-17.8 W 0003106960 FiberTower Network Services Corp. Taunton 07/11/2007 10835.00000 41-54-26.0 N MA NE 071-01-25.2
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-275482A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-275482A1.txt
    • CEDAR RAPIDS 07/18/2007 19620.00000 42-02-01.0 N IA NE 091-40-01.1 W 0003115319 Dynamic Broadband Cedar Rapids 07/18/2007 17820.00000 41-58-39.5 N IA NE 091-40-01.1 W 0003115319 Dynamic Broadband Cedar Rapids 07/18/2007 18060.00000 41-58-39.5 N IA NE 091-40-25.0 W 0003115321 Dynamic Broadband CEDAR RAPIDS 07/18/2007 17900.00000 42-01-57.0 N IA NE 091-40-25.0 W 0003115321 Dynamic Broadband CEDAR RAPIDS 07/18/2007 17980.00000 42-01-57.0 N IA NE 091-41-00.5 W 0003115325 Dynamic Broadband CEDAR RAPIDS 07/18/2007 19380.00000 41-57-10.6 N IA NE 091-41-00.5 W 0003115325 Dynamic Broadband CEDAR RAPIDS 07/18/2007 19540.00000 41-57-10.6 N CT NE 072-19-16.0 W 0003115764 Cellco Partnership Colchester 07/19/2007 06004.50000 41-35-33.0 N AZ NE 111-27-21.4 W 0003115850 SPARKPLUG SOUTHWEST, LLC PAGE 07/19/2007 21825.00000 36-54-46.2 N NM NE 106-37-37.4 W 0003116204 T-MOBILE LICENSE LLC Los Lunas 07/19/2007 19425.00000
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-275642A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-275642A1.txt
    • 27-58-44.0 N KS MD WPJB326 096-19-05.0 W 0003123310 KANSAS #15 LIMITED PARTNERSHIP MOLINE 07/27/2007 06745.00000 37-25-59.0 N KS MD WPJB325 096-15-36.0 W 0003123320 KANSAS #15 LIMITED PARTNERSHIP SEDAN 07/27/2007 06585.00000 37-06-39.0 N KS MD WPJB325 096-15-36.0 W 0003123320 KANSAS #15 LIMITED PARTNERSHIP SEDAN 07/27/2007 06625.00000 37-06-39.0 N WA MD WHF503 119-19-09.6 W 0003123503 NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS PCS, LLCRICHLAND 07/27/2007 06152.75000 46-14-00.5 N WA MD WHF503 119-19-09.6 W 0003123503 NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS PCS, LLCRICHLAND 07/27/2007 06640.00000 46-14-00.5 N WA MD WHF503 119-19-09.6 W 0003123503 NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS PCS, LLCRICHLAND 07/27/2007 17840.00000 46-14-00.5 N WA MD WHF503 119-19-09.6 W 0003123503 NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS PCS, LLCRICHLAND 07/27/2007 17965.00000 46-14-00.5 N Page 16 CF - Common Carrier Fixed Point to Point Microwave State Purpose Call
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-275668A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-275668A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-275668A1.txt
    • seconds of monitoring) on the next step. In a few cases sound dropped out and back in during the 20-second monitoring, but was absent well over 50% of the time. The interference amplitude at which greater than 50 percent loss of sound occurred was then known to be between the measured level and the previous step, 1 dB lower; consequently, 0.5 dB was subtracted from the measured power to obtain the nominal threshold at which sound loss exceeds 50 percent. Interference threshold measurements based on loss of sound were performed as a matter of convenience, though the actual parameter of interest is the undesired signal level at the threshold of visibility (TOV) of picture degradation. Because of the cliff effect that
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-275804A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-275804A1.txt
    • Page 22 CF - Common Carrier Fixed Point to Point Microwave State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City TX NE 098-27-29.9 W 0003125134 FiberTower Network Services Corp. San Antonio 07/30/2007 10755.00000 29-30-21.0 N TX NE 098-27-29.9 W 0003125134 FiberTower Network Services Corp. San Antonio 07/30/2007 23170.00000 29-30-21.0 N TX NE 098-28-00.5 W 0003125137 FiberTower Network Services Corp. San Antonio 07/30/2007 11245.00000 29-33-09.7 N TX NE 098-28-00.5 W 0003125137 FiberTower Network Services Corp. San Antonio 07/30/2007 19625.00000 29-33-09.7 N TX NE 097-40-13.0 W 0003125140 FiberTower Network Services Corp. AUSTIN 07/30/2007 10875.00000 30-16-40.0 N TX NE 097-58-13.5 W 0003125141 FiberTower Network Services Corp. AUSTIN 07/30/2007 11385.00000 30-12-47.4 N AZ NE 111-48-23.9 W 0003125358
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-276117A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-276117A1.txt
    • 18615.00000 36-10-09.9 N Page 10 CF - Common Carrier Fixed Point to Point Microwave State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City NV AM WLW355 115-08-34.7 W 0003119268 NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS PCS, LLCLas Vegas 08/14/2007 18645.00000 36-10-09.9 N WA AM WHF503 119-19-09.4 W 0003123503 NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS PCS, LLCRICHLAND 08/13/2007 06152.75000 46-14-00.5 N WA AM WHF503 119-19-09.4 W 0003123503 NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS PCS, LLCRICHLAND 08/13/2007 06640.00000 46-14-00.5 N WA AM WHF503 119-19-09.4 W 0003123503 NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS PCS, LLCRICHLAND 08/13/2007 17840.00000 46-14-00.5 N WA AM WHF503 119-19-09.4 W 0003123503 NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS PCS, LLCRICHLAND 08/13/2007 17965.00000 46-14-00.5 N TX AM WQCW221 097-55-19.0 W 0003125123 FiberTower Network Services Corp. AUSTIN 08/13/2007 10795.00000 30-15-04.0
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-276276A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-276276A1.txt
    • 08/20/2007 17960.00000 37-32-14.2 N TX AM 097-05-32.2 W 0003104575 AirBand Communications, Inc. Arlington 08/20/2007 11075.00000 32-45-24.8 N TX AM 098-25-16.9 W 0003113375 FiberTower Network Services Corp. San Antonio 08/24/2007 10795.00000 29-33-49.8 N TX AM 098-25-16.9 W 0003113375 FiberTower Network Services Corp. San Antonio 08/24/2007 21825.00000 29-33-49.8 N WA AM WHF503 119-19-09.6 W 0003123503 NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS PCS, LLCRICHLAND 08/21/2007 06152.75000 46-14-00.5 N Page 3 CF - Common Carrier Fixed Point to Point Microwave State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City WA AM WHF503 119-19-09.6 W 0003123503 NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS PCS, LLCRICHLAND 08/21/2007 06640.00000 46-14-00.5 N WA AM WHF503 119-19-09.6 W 0003123503 NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS PCS, LLCRICHLAND 08/21/2007 17840.00000 46-14-00.5 N WA
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-276277A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-276277A1.txt
    • MD WQER953 094-16-43.9 W 0003144145 CITY OF INDEPENDENCE Independence 08/20/2007 10577.50000 39-05-03.9 N MO MD WQER948 094-18-22.8 W 0003144149 CITY OF INDEPENDENCE Lake Tapawingo 08/20/2007 10642.50000 39-02-05.5 N MO MD WQER948 094-18-22.8 W 0003144149 CITY OF INDEPENDENCE Lake Tapawingo 08/20/2007 11622.50000 39-02-05.5 N AZ MD KOA83 112-06-12.5 W 0003144362 ARIZONA, STATE OF PHOENIX 08/20/2007 06063.80000 33-28-21.1 N AZ MD KOK44 112-04-00.5 W 0003144374 ARIZONA, STATE OF PHOENIX 08/20/2007 06315.84000 33-19-57.1 N Page 5 MW - Microwave Public Safety Pool State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City AZ MD KPL47 110-47-15.3 W 0003144388 ARIZONA, STATE OF TUCSON 08/20/2007 06004.50000 32-26-25.2 N AZ MD KPL47 110-47-15.3 W 0003144388 ARIZONA, STATE OF TUCSON 08/20/2007
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-276850A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-276850A1.txt
    • 09/20/2007 02093.00000 - 02110.00000 30-23-04.7 N TX AM KC26155 P 097-42-37.0 W 0003139519 CBS STATIONS GROUP OF TEXAS L.P.AUSTIN 09/20/2007 02450.00000 - 02467.00000 30-23-04.7 N TX AM KC26155 P 097-42-37.0 W 0003139519 CBS STATIONS GROUP OF TEXAS L.P.AUSTIN 09/20/2007 02467.00000 - 02483.50000 30-23-04.7 N VA MD KB97077 P 077-28-34.9 W 0003177571 ELCOM OF VIRGINIA LICENSE SUBSIDRICHMOND 09/20/2007 01990.00000 - 02008.00000 37-34-00.5 N VA MD KB97077 P 077-28-34.9 W 0003177571 ELCOM OF VIRGINIA LICENSE SUBSIDRICHMOND 09/20/2007 02008.00000 - 02110.00000 37-34-00.5 N TX MD KX3596 P 095-25-43.7 W 0003178147 KTRK TELEVISION, INC. HOUSTON 09/20/2007 01990.00000 - 02008.00000 29-43-34.8 N TX MD KX3596 P 095-25-43.7 W 0003178147 KTRK TELEVISION, INC. HOUSTON 09/20/2007 02008.00000 - 02110.00000 29-43-34.8 N CA NE P 122-23-58.8 W 0003175813 KGO
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-277386A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-277386A1.txt
    • 43-04-24.0 N VA MD KNEH676 080-27-26.2 W 0003195462 NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS OF THE MBLACKSBURG 10/10/2007 00855.83750 37-11-12.5 N VA MD KNEH676 079-15-08.1 W 0003195462 NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS OF THE MFOREST 10/10/2007 00855.83750 37-22-23.5 N VA MD KNEH676 079-08-37.1 W 0003195462 NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS OF THE MLYNCHBURG 10/10/2007 00855.83750 37-24-52.5 N NC MD KNEH676 079-43-24.1 W 0003195462 NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS OF THE MRIEDSVILLE 10/10/2007 00855.83750 36-22-00.5 N VA MD KNEH676 079-56-31.1 W 0003195462 NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS OF THE MROANOKE 10/10/2007 00855.83750 37-12-37.5 N OK MD KNEM279 095-46-52.9 W 0003195463 NEXTEL LICENSE HOLDINGS 4, INC. BROKEN ARROW 10/10/2007 00855.83750 36-03-34.4 N OK MD KNEM279 095-47-03.0 W 0003195463 NEXTEL LICENSE HOLDINGS 4, INC. CATOOSA 10/10/2007 00855.83750 36-10-49.0 N OK MD KNEM279 095-55-34.0 W 0003195463 NEXTEL LICENSE HOLDINGS 4, INC.
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-277833A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-277833A1.pdf
    • 465.150 MHz was originating from a vehicle driven and solely occupied by Mr. McCollum. An officer of the Houston Police Department stopped the vehicle occupied by Mr. McCollum, and a search of the vehicle found an ICOM handheld radio programmed to transmit signals on the frequency 465.150 MHz. The ICOM radio was manufactured with two power settings, 5 watts and 0.5 watts and was not certified for use as a Part 15 device. Based on the agents' experience with this type of radio transmitting equipment and the distance over which the signals were heard, the agents determined that the signals transmitted on December 13, 2006, and February 12, 2007 exceeded the limits for operation under Part 15 of the Commission's Rules
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-278130A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-278130A1.txt
    • RSA NO. 2 LIMITED PARTNERBAKER 11/08/2007 06555.00000 44-35-57.6 N OR MD WPJF825 117-47-01.8 W 0003226085 OREGON RSA NO. 2 LIMITED PARTNERBAKER 11/08/2007 06655.00000 44-35-57.6 N OR MD WPJF823 117-23-59.6 W 0003226092 OREGON RSA NO. 2 LIMITED PARTNERDURKEE 11/08/2007 06815.00000 44-32-40.5 N OR MD WPJF823 117-23-59.6 W 0003226092 OREGON RSA NO. 2 LIMITED PARTNERDURKEE 11/08/2007 10875.00000 44-32-40.5 N AZ MD WLA770 112-01-00.5 W 0003226098 Verizon Wireless (VAW) LLC PHOENIX 11/08/2007 18055.00000 33-27-13.1 N OR MD WMQ832 121-48-42.0 W 0003226152 United States Cellular Operating CompanyKLAMATH FALLS 11/08/2007 06256.54000 42-13-17.0 N OR MD WMQ832 121-48-42.0 W 0003226152 United States Cellular Operating CompanyKLAMATH FALLS 11/08/2007 06417.14000 42-13-17.0 N OR MD WMQ832 121-48-42.0 W 0003226152 United States Cellular Operating CompanyKLAMATH FALLS 11/08/2007 06545.62500 42-13-17.0 N OR
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-278290A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-278290A1.txt
    • W 0003231834 NORTHERN INDIANA PUBLIC SERVICEGARY 11/15/2007 06621.25000 41-35-30.1 N IN MD WJS69 087-22-27.1 W 0003231875 NORTHERN INDIANA PUBLIC SERVICEGARY 11/15/2007 06781.25000 41-33-42.1 N Page 24 MG - Microwave Industrial/Business Pool State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City PA MD WNTB772 074-55-06.5 W 0003232907 PECO ENERGY COMPANY BENSALEM 11/16/2007 00928.36875 40-05-00.5 N PA MD WNTB772 074-55-06.5 W 0003232907 PECO ENERGY COMPANY BENSALEM 11/16/2007 00928.68125 40-05-00.5 N PA MD WNTB772 074-55-06.5 W 0003232907 PECO ENERGY COMPANY BENSALEM 11/16/2007 00952.36875 40-05-00.5 N PA MD WNTB772 074-55-06.5 W 0003232907 PECO ENERGY COMPANY BENSALEM 11/16/2007 00952.68125 40-05-00.5 N VA MD WQFF210 077-35-34.0 W 0003233371 Clearwire Spectrum Holdings, LLC Midlothian, VA 11/16/2007 21825.00000 37-26-10.0 N VA
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-278415A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-278415A1.txt
    • Latitude City MS NE 091-04-11.4 W 0003235482 Cellualr South Licenses, Inc. Greenville 11/19/2007 06286.19000 33-30-57.5 N TX NE 096-41-29.8 W 0003235783 San Antonio MTA, L.P. CARMINE 11/19/2007 06256.54000 30-07-09.9 N TX NE 096-34-08.7 W 0003235784 San Antonio MTA, L.P. BRENHAM 11/19/2007 06004.50000 30-11-19.1 N TX NE 096-34-08.7 W 0003235784 San Antonio MTA, L.P. BRENHAM 11/19/2007 06063.80000 30-11-19.1 N TX NE 096-26-00.5 W 0003235785 San Antonio MTA, L.P. BRENHAM 11/19/2007 06315.84000 30-09-48.4 N OR NE 124-24-47.7 W 0003236105 Verizon Wireless (VAW) LLC Gold Beach 11/20/2007 10637.50000 42-23-48.0 N OR NE 124-25-02.1 W 0003236374 Verizon Wireless (VAW) LLC Wedderburn 11/20/2007 10572.50000 42-26-24.4 N TX NE 096-48-56.2 W 0003236994 AirBand Communications, Inc Waxahachie 11/20/2007 11055.00000 32-27-38.2 N LA NE 091-11-42.2 W 0003237002 Verizon Wireless
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-278673A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-278673A1.txt
    • MD WLT564 117-30-03.2 W 0003242383 LOS ANGELES SMSA LIMITED PARTNELYTLE CREEK 11/28/2007 10658.75000 34-12-49.0 N CA MD WMJ403 117-49-09.2 W 0003242412 LOS ANGELES SMSA LIMITED PARTNEYORBA LINDA 11/28/2007 10835.00000 33-51-30.0 N CA MD WMJ403 117-49-09.2 W 0003242412 LOS ANGELES SMSA LIMITED PARTNEYORBA LINDA 11/28/2007 10915.00000 33-51-30.0 N WV MD WPJF791 080-22-14.4 W 0003242530 HARDY CELLULAR TELEPHONE COMPLOST CREEK 11/28/2007 06417.14000 39-08-00.5 N WV MD WPJF791 080-22-14.4 W 0003242530 HARDY CELLULAR TELEPHONE COMPLOST CREEK 11/28/2007 06625.00000 39-08-00.5 N Page 10 CF - Common Carrier Fixed Point to Point Microwave State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City WV MD WPJF791 080-22-14.4 W 0003242530 HARDY CELLULAR TELEPHONE COMPLOST CREEK 11/28/2007 11622.50000 39-08-00.5 N WV
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-278832A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-278832A1.txt
    • 17 GX - SMR, 806-821/851-866 MHz, Conventional State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City VT MD KNEP540 073-05-18.5 W 0003247857 NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS OF THE MESSEX JUNCTION 12/03/2007 00865.26250 44-28-22.2 N NY MD KNEP555 073-15-40.4 W 0003247859 NEXTEL OF NEW YORK, INC. BAY SHORE 12/03/2007 00855.83750 40-46-04.4 N NY MD KNEP555 073-52-00.5 W 0003247859 NEXTEL OF NEW YORK, INC. BROOKLYN 12/03/2007 00855.83750 40-39-07.4 N NY MD KNEP555 073-43-17.5 W 0003247859 NEXTEL OF NEW YORK, INC. GLEN OAKS 12/03/2007 00855.83750 40-45-16.4 N NY MD KNEP555 073-55-40.5 W 0003247859 NEXTEL OF NEW YORK, INC. NEW YORK 12/03/2007 00855.83750 40-51-18.4 N NY MD KNEP555 073-27-44.4 W 0003247859 NEXTEL OF NEW YORK, INC. PLAINVIEW 12/03/2007 00855.83750
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-278883A2.pdf
    • Commission is considering this step and 22 balancing it against the goal of ensuring that stations can build their final digital facilities on time. Such a step would most likely be permitted only if the stations provide advance notice to viewers as well as to the Commission. Seventh, the Commission looked ahead to the post-transition period and proposed a new 0.5 % interference standard to apply to maximizations and new channel allotments after the transition. The Notice also tentatively concluded not to accept applications for maximizations or to lift the freeze on such applications until the processing is completed for stations to build their post-transition authorized facilities. Eighth, to further enhance our tracking and to ensure that all stations are fully
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279015A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279015A1.txt
    • State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City TX MD WRQ8 095-02-07.0 W 0003256877 Aviation Spectrum Resources Inc HITCHCOCK 12/12/2007 00129.05000 29-19-48.0 N TX MD WRQ8 095-02-07.0 W 0003256877 Aviation Spectrum Resources Inc HITCHCOCK 12/12/2007 00130.75000 29-19-48.0 N TX MD KGD9 098-36-01.2 W 0003259254 COMANCHE COUNTY CITY AIRPORT ACOMANCHE 12/14/2007 00123.07500 31-54-00.5 N OR NE 122-41-14.4 W 0003254530 Oregon Health & Science University Portland 12/10/2007 00123.05000 45-29-44.4 N AL NE 088-14-34.1 W 0003255952 Aviation Spectrum Resources, Inc Mobile 12/11/2007 00131.27500 30-41-28.4 N MO NE 089-34-14.7 W 0003255960 Aviation Spectrum Resources, Inc Cape Girardeau 12/11/2007 00129.30000 37-13-31.1 N TN NE 088-54-56.2 W 0003255968 Aviation Spectrum Resources, Inc Jackson 12/11/2007 00129.30000 35-55-59.6 N KY
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279136A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279136A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279136A1.txt
    • Paragraph 2, fifth bullet, the last sentence is revised to read as follows: The VRS rates shall be effective for the 2007-2008 through 2009-2010 Fund years, beginning on the first day of the month following the effective date of this Order, subject to annual adjustment as set forth below. Paragraph 47, in the second-to-last sentence, ``0.05 percent'' is replaced by ``0.5 percent.'' Paragraph 55, in the last sentence, ``0.05 percent'' is replaced by ``0.5 percent.'' Paragraph 56, in the second-to-last sentence, ``0.05 percent'' is replaced by ``0.5 percent.'' Paragraph 67, in the second-to-last sentence, ``1,000,000'' is replaced by ``500,000.'' Paragraph 88, in the second-to-last sentence, delete ``, as raised below in the FNPRM,[.]'' Paragraph 103, in the last sentence, ``http://www.fcc.gov/cgb.dro'' is
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279218A1.pdf
    • Philadelphia, PA, Sacramento, CA, and Washington, D.C. Sirius states that it has identified these sites as necessary to the provision of its commercial SDARS. SAT-STA-20071219-00178 E Special Temporary Authority 12/19/2007 15:10:50:73300 Date Filed: XM Radio Inc. On December 19, 2007, XM Radio Inc. (XM) filed a request for special temporary authority to operate a very low power repeater (not exceeding 0.5 watts EIRP) at its office building in Vienna, Virginia for 180 days. XM states that use of the repeater is necessary to provide XM's signal to its employees in the building. Page 1 of 1
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A1.txt
    • Support 56 126 183 500 602 757 915102810721132118812631690171822352592293532653468379640964291 1986198719881989199019911992199319941995199619971998199920002001200220032004200520062007 3 - 14 YearCompaniesHigh-Cost Loop Support Safety Net Additive Support Safety Valve Support High-Cost Model Support Long- Term Support Interstate Common Line Support Interstate Access Support Local Switching Support Total Support ILECs 864.2 - - - 472.9 - - 380.3 1,717.4 1999 CETCs 0.1 - - - 0.4 - - 0.0 0.5 Total 864.3 - - - 473.3 - - 380.3 1,718.0 ILECs 873.8 - - 218.7 477.3 - 278.8 384.7 2,233.3 2000 CETCs 0.4 - - 0.0 1.1 - 0.0 0.0 1.5 Total 874.1 - - 218.7 478.4 - 278.8 384.7 2,234.8 ILECs 921.5 - - 205.4 484.2 - 575.7 387.9 2,574.7 2001 CETCs 5.7 - - 0.3 8.0 - 1.0
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A11.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A11.txt
    • 14 See supra note 9. AT&T AT&T AT&T AT&T AT&T Qwest Verizon Verizon Verizon Ameritech BellSouth PacificSouthwestern SNET North South GTE ACCESS SERVICES PROVIDED TO CARRIERS -- SWITCHED ACCESS Percent Installation Commitments Met 99.9 100.0 99.0 98.2 100.0 100.0 99.9 99.8 96.9 Average Installation Interval (days) 23.7 19.1 24.2 25.6 19.4 14.5 29.7 18.6 20.6 Average Repair Interval (hours) 5.8 0.5 7.6 3.4 2.2 1.6 5.1 7.6 8.4 ACCESS SERVICES PROVIDED TO CARRIERS -- SPECIAL ACCESS Percent Installation Commitments Met 94.7 99.7 95.1 98.1 99.9 96.8 93.1 94.7 92.3 Average Installation Interval (days) 18.1 14.5 15.4 16.0 18.5 6.0 12.8 12.3 9.0 Average Repair Interval (hours) 5.5 3.1 5.9 4.3 3.6 3.2 4.7 3.7 3.9 LOCAL SERVICES PROVIDED TO RESIDENTIAL AND
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A5.txt
    • Support 56 126 183 500 602 757 915102810721132118812631690171822352592293532653468379640964291 1986198719881989199019911992199319941995199619971998199920002001200220032004200520062007 3 - 14 YearCompaniesHigh-Cost Loop Support Safety Net Additive Support Safety Valve Support High-Cost Model Support Long- Term Support Interstate Common Line Support Interstate Access Support Local Switching Support Total Support ILECs 864.2 - - - 472.9 - - 380.3 1,717.4 1999 CETCs 0.1 - - - 0.4 - - 0.0 0.5 Total 864.3 - - - 473.3 - - 380.3 1,718.0 ILECs 873.8 - - 218.7 477.3 - 278.8 384.7 2,233.3 2000 CETCs 0.4 - - 0.0 1.1 - 0.0 0.0 1.5 Total 874.1 - - 218.7 478.4 - 278.8 384.7 2,234.8 ILECs 921.5 - - 205.4 484.2 - 575.7 387.9 2,574.7 2001 CETCs 5.7 - - 0.3 8.0 - 1.0
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A9.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A9.txt
    • 15.6 14.6 15.9 6.2 8.0 1982 10.8 9.0 2.7 3.9 4.2 1.7 1983 3.1 0.2 1.4 0.0 7.4 3.9 1984 17.2 10.4 -4.3 -5.1 3.6 3.8 1985 8.9 12.4 -3.7 -3.0 0.6 2.1 1986 7.1 8.9 -9.4 -10.0 0.3 -3.5 1987 3.3 2.6 -12.4 -11.8 -3.0 -3.0 1988 4.5 4.6 -4.2 -2.1 -4.2 -3.8 1989 0.6 1.9 -1.3 -1.7 -2.6 0.5 1990 1.0 1.5 -3.7 -0.1 -2.2 -2.2 1991 5.1 2.1 1.3 -1.3 -1.5 -2.6 1992 0.5 -0.2 -1.3 1.0 -2.4 1.3 1993 1.0 0.8 6.5 3.8 0.2 -1.1 1994 -0.3 0.7 5.4 6.1 -1.0 -1.4 1995 2.6 ** 0.1 ** -3.8 ** 1996 0.9 0.2 3.7 0.8 6.1 0.9 1997 1.0 0.1 -4.3 7.8 2.8 -4.3 1998 1.3 0.0 -0.8
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279250A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279250A1.txt
    • ALBUQUERQUE 12/28/2007 00947.25000 35-08-34.8 N TX NE 101-56-11.0 W 0003267641 KYMI LICENSE SUB LLC Lamesa 12/26/2007 00947.87500 32-42-29.0 N TX NE 101-56-11.0 W 0003267641 KYMI LICENSE SUB LLC Lamesa 12/26/2007 00948.12500 32-42-29.0 N GA NE 084-58-28.0 W 0003269766 ABG GEORGIA LICENSES, LLC Columbus 12/27/2007 00950.50000 32-28-21.0 N AL NE 085-03-20.0 W 0003270006 ABG GEORGIA LICENSES, LLC Phenix City 12/27/2007 00950.00000 32-28-00.5 N GA NE 084-58-28.0 W 0003270079 ABG GEORGIA LICENSES, LLC Columbus 12/27/2007 00945.50000 32-28-21.0 N CD - Paging and Radiotelephone State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City TX MD KLB716 099-44-58.0 W 0003268379 MOBILE PHONE OF TEXAS, INC. ABILENE 12/26/2007 00075.88000 32-16-59.0 N CF - Common Carrier Fixed Point to
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279506A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279506A1.txt
    • N ID MD WLN930 115-13-18.3 W 0003285050 RURAL TELEPHONE COMPANY ATLANTA 01/11/2008 06765.00000 43-46-24.6 N PR MD WPSL953 066-01-18.2 W 0003285317 SprintCom, Inc. TRUJILLO ALTO 01/11/2008 10715.00000 18-22-13.3 N PR MD WPSL953 066-01-18.2 W 0003285317 SprintCom, Inc. TRUJILLO ALTO 01/11/2008 11168.75000 18-22-13.3 N PR MD WPSL953 066-01-18.2 W 0003285317 SprintCom, Inc. TRUJILLO ALTO 01/11/2008 19470.00000 18-22-13.3 N PR MD WPSL955 066-04-00.5 W 0003285353 SprintCom, Inc. RIO PIEDRAS 01/11/2008 11215.00000 18-22-09.5 N PR MD WPSL955 066-04-00.5 W 0003285353 SprintCom, Inc. RIO PIEDRAS 01/11/2008 11365.00000 18-22-09.5 N PR MD WPSL955 066-04-00.5 W 0003285353 SprintCom, Inc. RIO PIEDRAS 01/11/2008 17850.00000 18-22-09.5 N PR MD WPSL955 066-04-00.5 W 0003285353 SprintCom, Inc. RIO PIEDRAS 01/11/2008 17885.00000 18-22-09.5 N PR MD WPSL955 066-04-00.5 W 0003285353 SprintCom, Inc.
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279647A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279647A1.txt
    • Information TechnologBronx 01/14/2008 23125.00000 40-49-48.0 N NY NE 073-53-20.8 W 0003286843 Northrop Grumman Information TechnologBronx 01/14/2008 21925.00000 40-49-49.5 N NY NE 073-53-20.8 W 0003286843 Northrop Grumman Information TechnologBronx 01/14/2008 21975.00000 40-49-49.5 N NY NE 073-53-53.7 W 0003286869 Northrop Grumman Information TechnologBronx 01/14/2008 23075.00000 40-50-44.0 N NY NE 073-54-04.3 W 0003286883 Northrop Grumman Information TechnologBronx 01/14/2008 21875.00000 40-49-59.5 N PA NE 080-07-00.5 W 0003286927 METROPOLITAN AREA NETWORKS, INSewickley 01/14/2008 10795.00000 40-32-11.6 N PA NE 080-06-53.9 W 0003286930 METROPOLITAN AREA NETWORKS, INPittsburgh 01/14/2008 11245.00000 40-26-57.9 N PA NE 080-06-53.9 W 0003286930 METROPOLITAN AREA NETWORKS, INPittsburgh 01/14/2008 11285.00000 40-26-57.9 N PA NE 080-07-31.0 W 0003286933 METROPOLITAN AREA NETWORKS, INMc Kees Rocks 01/14/2008 10755.00000 40-28-53.2 N PA NE 079-58-43.6 W 0003286936 METROPOLITAN AREA NETWORKS, INMonongahela
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279648A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279648A1.txt
    • GURABO 01/16/2008 06004.50000 18-16-46.4 N PR MD WQEV774 065-56-35.8 W 0003291475 NEPTUNO MEDIA GURABO 01/16/2008 06093.45000 18-16-46.4 N PR MD WQEV774 065-56-35.8 W 0003291475 NEPTUNO MEDIA GURABO 01/16/2008 11325.00000 18-16-46.4 N PR MD WQGT245 065-58-42.9 W 0003291477 NEPTUNO MEDIA CAROLINA 01/16/2008 10995.00000 18-24-26.4 N PR MD WQGT245 065-58-42.9 W 0003291477 NEPTUNO MEDIA CAROLINA 01/16/2008 10995.00000 18-24-26.4 N CA MD WQHA612 118-13-00.5 W 0003292746 T-MOBILE LICENSE LLC RANCHO DOMINGU 01/17/2008 18082.50000 33-51-48.6 N Page 13 CF - Common Carrier Fixed Point to Point Microwave State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City CA MD WQHA612 118-13-00.5 W 0003292746 T-MOBILE LICENSE LLC RANCHO DOMINGU 01/17/2008 18092.50000 33-51-48.6 N CA MD WMR504 122-35-01.0 W 0003292787
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279689A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279689A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279689A1.txt
    • of whether F(50,10) undesired signals will exceed the following desired-to-undesired (D/U) signal ratios, assumed use of a directional receiving antenna, and use of the terrain dependent Longley-Rice point-to-point propagation model. Applicants may request the use of a cell size other than the default of 2.0 km per side, but only requests for cell sizes of 1.0 km per side or 0.5 km per side will be considered. The threshold levels at which interference is considered to occur are: ***** 7. This Erratum revises item 6 under the heading PART 73: RADIO BROADCAST SERVICES in Appendix B (Rule Changes) of the Report and Order to conform the rule to the style of the Office of the Federal Register by specifying in §
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279767A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279767A1.txt
    • 081-48-02.5 W 0003295948 MONTCLAIR COMMUNICATIONS, INC.NAPLES 01/22/2008 02093.00000 - 02110.00000 26-11-35.4 N FL MD WCQ471 081-45-53.6 W 0003295969 WATERMAN BROADCASTING CORP. OPunta Gorda 01/22/2008 02008.00000 - 02025.00000 26-49-22.4 N FL MD WCQ471 081-45-53.6 W 0003295969 WATERMAN BROADCASTING CORP. OPunta Gorda 01/22/2008 02037.50000 - 02049.50000 26-49-22.4 N PA MD WGV706 080-19-04.8 W 0003299043 CBS BROADCASTING INC. BEAVER 01/23/2008 07075.00000 - 07100.00000 40-43-00.5 N OR NE 123-06-52.0 W 0003298471 CHURCHILL MEDIA III, LLC EUGENE 01/23/2008 18120.00000 44-00-10.0 N Page 43 TI - TV Intercity Relay State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City FL NE 081-03-34.0 W 0003298885 POST-NEWSWEEK STATIONS, ORLANDCHRISTMAS 01/23/2008 07050.00000 - 07075.00000 28-36-36.0 N TP - TV Pickup State Purpose Call
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279929A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279929A1.txt
    • the numbering resources are treated as CLEC resources. 14 Table 4 Telephone Number Utilization by State as of December 31, 2006 Assigned Intermediate Reserved Aging Administrative Available1 Total State/jurisdiction 000s % 000s % 000s % 000s % 000s % 000s % 000s Alabama 8,674 40.2 509 2.4 307 1.4 488 2.3 287 1.3 11,289 52.4 21,554 Alaska 1,357 25.5 28 0.5 31 0.6 68 1.3 29 0.5 3,806 71.6 5,318 American Samoa 18 90.3 0 0.0 1 3.7 0 0.7 1 4.0 0 1.3 20 Arizona 12,328 58.6 322 1.5 187 0.9 606 2.9 173 0.8 7,429 35.3 21,044 Arkansas 4,371 31.2 707 5.1 62 0.4 245 1.8 181 1.3 8,422 60.2 13,989 California 75,273 46.8 5,921 3.7 574 0.4 3,744
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279931A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279931A1.txt
    • Avg BellSouth Weighted AT&T Avg. (excluding BellSouth) Qwest 17 ARMIS 43-05 Report 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 AT&T Ameritech 2.0 2.1 1.5 1.4 1.4 1.5 AT&T BellSouth 1.2 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.3 1.3 AT&T Pacific 1.3 1.2 1.5 1.6 1.5 1.6 AT&T Southwestern 2.2 1.8 1.9 2.0 2.1 1.1 AT&T SNET 1.8 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.1 Qwest 0.6 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.2 Verizon GTE 0.8 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.9 0.9 Verizon North (Combined with Verizon South) Verizon South 1.1 1.0 1.1 1.1 1.0 1.3 Embarq (formerly Sprint) 3.2 1.5 1.4 1.7 1.7 1.8 Weighted BOC/Embarq Composite* 1.4 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 * Weighted composite is calculated using access line counts. Chart 5A Average Residential Installation Interval in
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-280030A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-280030A1.txt
    • WQCP236 075-39-32.9 W 0003304351 STATE OF DELAWARE - DTI WRANGLE HILL 01/28/2008 05945.20000 39-34-42.2 N KY MD WQHC521 083-07-52.0 W 0003304886 KENTUCKY, COMMONWEALTH OF SALYERSVILLE 01/28/2008 06718.75000 37-45-42.0 N AZ MD WCE391 110-33-40.3 W 0003305135 ARIZONA, STATE OF GLOBE 01/28/2008 06635.62500 33-39-37.1 N AZ MD WGY479 110-44-48.3 W 0003305149 ARIZONA, STATE OF GLOBE 01/28/2008 06805.00000 33-24-04.2 N AZ MD KOK44 112-04-00.5 W 0003305214 ARIZONA, STATE OF PHOENIX 01/28/2008 06315.84000 33-19-57.1 N PA MD WNEF310 075-09-04.6 W 0003305798 MONTGOMERY, COUNTY OF Dresher 01/29/2008 06815.62500 40-08-41.4 N PA MD WQCE913 075-25-04.0 W 0003305799 MONTGOMERY COUNTY OF EAGLEVILLE 01/29/2008 02186.40000 40-09-29.0 N PA MD WQCE913 075-25-04.0 W 0003305799 MONTGOMERY COUNTY OF EAGLEVILLE 01/29/2008 02196.00000 40-09-29.0 N PA MD WQCE913 075-25-04.0 W 0003305799 MONTGOMERY COUNTY
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-280033A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-280033A1.txt
    • State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City RO WPXL708 0003310454 PARDIECK AVIATION 02/01/2008 AS - Aural Studio Transmitter Link State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City AL AM WQIG642 085-03-20.0 W 0003270006 ABG GEORGIA LICENSES, LLC Phenix City 01/29/2008 00950.00000 32-28-00.5 N NY AM WHS460 076-16-43.0 W 0003296313 PUBLIC BROADCASTING COUNCIL OF NEW HAVEN 01/28/2008 00951.00000 43-28-36.0 N NY AM WHS460 076-16-43.0 W 0003296313 PUBLIC BROADCASTING COUNCIL OF NEW HAVEN 01/28/2008 00951.00000 43-28-36.0 N NY AM WHY670 075-55-08.9 W 0003296314 PUBLIC BROADCASTING COUNCIL OF MANLIUS 01/28/2008 00947.00000 43-01-16.4 N NY AM WHY670 075-55-08.9 W 0003296314 PUBLIC BROADCASTING COUNCIL OF MANLIUS 01/28/2008
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-280312A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-280312A1.txt
    • N MA MD WLU878 071-57-28.3 W 0003322542 NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS PCS, LLCGARDNER 02/12/2008 10626.25000 42-33-54.5 N MA MD WLU878 071-57-28.3 W 0003322542 NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS PCS, LLCGARDNER 02/12/2008 10627.50000 42-33-54.5 N CA MD WLM876 116-53-37.1 W 0003323405 LOS ANGELES SMSA LIMITED PARTNEBANNING 02/13/2008 10637.50000 33-56-38.1 N IA MD WPWU923 095-27-53.3 W 0003323674 USCOC OF GREATER IOWA, INC. SHELBY 02/13/2008 05945.20000 41-30-00.5 N IA MD WPWU923 095-27-53.3 W 0003323674 USCOC OF GREATER IOWA, INC. SHELBY 02/13/2008 06093.45000 41-30-00.5 N IA MD WPWU923 095-27-53.3 W 0003323674 USCOC OF GREATER IOWA, INC. SHELBY 02/13/2008 06595.00000 41-30-00.5 N IA MD WPWU923 095-27-53.3 W 0003323674 USCOC OF GREATER IOWA, INC. SHELBY 02/13/2008 06610.00000 41-30-00.5 N IA MD WPWU923 095-27-53.3 W 0003323674 USCOC OF GREATER IOWA, INC.
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-280465A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-280465A1.txt
    • Page 14 CF - Common Carrier Fixed Point to Point Microwave State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City IL NE 088-07-29.0 W 0003332103 Business Only Broadband, LLC CAROL STREAM 02/20/2008 11225.00000 41-56-14.0 N IL NE 088-07-29.0 W 0003332103 Business Only Broadband, LLC CAROL STREAM 02/20/2008 11345.00000 41-56-14.0 N CA NE 118-09-00.5 W 0003332344 NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS PCS, LLCLOS ANGELES 02/20/2008 19495.00000 34-02-04.4 N CA NE 118-09-05.3 W 0003332356 NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS PCS, LLCMONTEREY PARK 02/20/2008 17935.00000 34-02-31.8 N CA NE 121-18-11.7 W 0003332781 T-MOBILE LICENSE LLC Roseville 02/21/2008 17845.00000 38-46-55.8 N CA NE 121-17-01.4 W 0003332782 T-MOBILE LICENSE LLC WEST VALLEY 02/21/2008 19405.00000 38-49-14.1 N TX NE 097-47-16.9 W 0003333634 AT&T
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-280522A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-280522A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-280522A1.txt
    • results of the random simulations. Each entry in the table shows the relevant computation averaged over 100 randomly chosen parameter sets involving 6 (instead of 8) users. The random input values are chosen as follows: user values are random integers between 2 and 10; user demands are random integers between 1 and 25; user congestion factors are random numbers between 0.5 and 0.8; the capacity of Option B is equal to the total demand of all users multiplied by a random number between 0.3 and 1.0; and the price of Option A is a random number chosen between the minimum and maximum total surplus for each user. Marginal cost in the competitive scenarios is assumed to be equal to 1. In
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-280745A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-280745A1.txt
    • applications, subject to the pre-grant notice and petition procedure of Section 309 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, that were accepted for filing. AF - Aeronautical and Fixed State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City TX AM 095-50-00.4 W 0003325827 COVEY TRAILS CIVIC CLUB INC RICHMOND 03/03/2008 00122.72500 29-41-00.5 N FL NE 086-13-00.0 W 0003342313 Zerotime Aviation LLC DeFuniak Springs 03/03/2008 00122.70000 30-54-00.0 N CO NE 108-45-38.4 W 0003344189 Rangely Airport Rangely 03/04/2008 00122.80000 40-05-41.9 N IL NE 088-07-40.4 W 0003352837 Village of Bolingbrook, Illinois DepartmeBolingbrook 03/07/2008 00122.97500 41-41-43.8 N RO KWG3 0003343033 UVALDE, CITY OF 03/03/2008 RO WPXQ434 0003344200 Aircraft Management Services, Inc. 03/04/2008 RO KHS6 0003344211 NATCHITOCHES,
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-281235A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-281235A1.txt
    • (Police Dept.) Pine Bluff 03/24/2008 06800.00000 34-17-06.3 N AR MD WQBT850 092-02-04.5 W 0003370039 Arkansas, State of (Police Dept.) Pine Bluff 03/24/2008 06820.00000 34-17-06.3 N AR MD WNEX518 093-07-26.7 W 0003370043 ARKANSAS, STATE OF (POLICE DEPT.)HOT SPRINGS 03/24/2008 06615.00000 34-30-50.3 N AR MD WNEX518 093-07-26.7 W 0003370043 ARKANSAS, STATE OF (POLICE DEPT.)HOT SPRINGS 03/24/2008 06625.00000 34-30-50.3 N AR MD WNEX605 092-33-00.5 W 0003370046 ARKANSAS, STATE OF (POLICE DEPT.)RAMSEY 03/24/2008 06835.00000 33-53-50.3 N AR MD WNEX607 092-13-39.4 W 0003370049 ARKANSAS, STATE OF (POLICE DEPT.)HUTTIG 03/24/2008 02190.40000 33-04-56.4 N AR MD WNEX607 092-13-39.4 W 0003370049 ARKANSAS, STATE OF (POLICE DEPT.)HUTTIG 03/24/2008 02195.20000 33-04-56.4 N Page 2 MW - Microwave Public Safety Pool State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-281566A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-281566A1.txt
    • and Fixed State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City GA NE 084-56-23.3 W 0003389932 Paulding County Commissioners Dallas 04/08/2008 00123.07500 33-54-54.9 N AL NE 086-15-34.0 W 0003392527 Saint Clair County Airport Authority Pell City 04/10/2008 00123.05000 33-33-53.0 N VA RM KJW4 078-27-16.0 W 0003390604 PIEDMONT HAWTHORNE AVIATION INCCHARLOTTESVILLE 04/09/2008 00122.95000 38-08-00.5 N IN RM WPXJ470 084-59-05.2 W 0003393123 PORTLAND CITY OF Portland 04/11/2008 00122.80000 40-27-11.3 N RO KMP8 0003387290 ARDMORE, CITY OF 04/07/2008 AS - Aural Studio Transmitter Link State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City TX NE 099-08-23.0 W 0003387325 MUNBILLA KERRVILLE, LTD. Kerrville 04/07/2008 00951.50000 30-03-07.0 N Page 1
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-281567A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-281567A1.txt
    • CLEVELAND 04/08/2008 00952.61875 41-32-34.6 N OH AM 081-31-30.4 W 0003382409 FELHC, INC. WALTON HILLS 04/08/2008 00928.18125 41-21-46.2 N OH AM 081-31-30.4 W 0003382409 FELHC, INC. WALTON HILLS 04/08/2008 00952.18125 41-21-46.2 N GA AM 084-11-50.7 W 0003383240 Clearwire Spectrum Holdings II, LLC Stone Mountain 04/08/2008 23020.00000 33-45-36.4 N OR MD WNEZ434 120-49-45.9 W 0003389890 MIDSTATE ELECTRIC COOPERATIVE INSUMMER LAKE 04/08/2008 02188.00000 42-59-00.5 N OR MD WNEZ434 120-49-45.9 W 0003389890 MIDSTATE ELECTRIC COOPERATIVE INSUMMER LAKE 04/08/2008 06543.75000 42-59-00.5 N OR MD WNEZ433 121-43-00.1 W 0003389892 MIDSTATE ELECTRIC COOPERATIVE INCRESCENT 04/08/2008 06713.75000 43-18-19.8 N OR MD WNEZ433 121-43-00.1 W 0003389892 MIDSTATE ELECTRIC COOPERATIVE INCRESCENT 04/08/2008 06718.75000 43-18-19.8 N TX MD WPNB221 095-27-12.8 W 0003390279 RAYBURN COUNTRY ELECTRIC COOPPARIS 04/09/2008 00959.15000 33-40-02.3 N TX MD
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-281713A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-281713A1.txt
    • 32-26-10.5 N TX MD KQK27 096-29-03.9 W 0003398670 UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD MEXIA 04/16/2008 00953.20000 31-39-23.6 N TX MD KQB84 096-34-55.9 W 0003398672 UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD HEARNE 04/16/2008 02181.60000 30-51-59.7 N TX MD KQB86 096-22-58.9 W 0003398673 UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD BRYAN 04/16/2008 06595.00000 30-39-25.2 N MT MD WHH605 112-36-28.0 W 0003399884 NorthWestern Corporation BUTTE 04/16/2008 10995.00000 45-56-11.7 N NY MD WQIE430 073-58-00.5 W 0003400248 Northrop Grumman Information TechnologBrooklyn 04/17/2008 21925.00000 40-40-28.6 N NY MD WQIE430 073-58-00.5 W 0003400248 Northrop Grumman Information TechnologBrooklyn 04/17/2008 22075.00000 40-40-28.6 N NY MD WQHM862 074-00-17.3 W 0003400259 Northrop Grumman Information TechnologNew York 04/17/2008 23075.00000 40-43-12.2 N CA MD WQDW441 118-42-10.0 W 0003400455 Nextweb Inc Calabasas 04/17/2008 23010.00000 34-08-45.0 N AZ MD WNES754 112-13-39.6 W 0003400500 Salt River
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-281857A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-281857A1.txt
    • W 0003409408 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS II Tigard 04/24/2008 23175.00000 45-25-14.0 N OR MD WQHH545 122-45-33.2 W 0003409411 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS II Portland 04/24/2008 10815.00000 45-26-06.1 N OR MD WQHH545 122-45-33.2 W 0003409411 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS II Portland 04/24/2008 21925.00000 45-26-06.1 N OR MD WQHH545 122-45-33.2 W 0003409411 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS II Portland 04/24/2008 21975.00000 45-26-06.1 N MA MD WPNM312 P 071-04-00.5 W 0003409483 WATERTOWN, TOWN OF WATERTOWN 04/24/2008 00952.83125 42-21-07.6 N MA MD WPNM312 P 071-04-00.5 W 0003409483 WATERTOWN, TOWN OF WATERTOWN 04/24/2008 00952.83125 42-21-07.6 N OR MD WQHD763 122-46-42.4 W 0003410777 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS II Portland 04/24/2008 17800.00000 45-30-42.5 N OR MD WQHD763 122-46-42.4 W 0003410777 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS II Portland 04/24/2008 17960.00000 45-30-42.5 N OR MD WQHD763 122-46-42.4 W
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-282287A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-282287A1.txt
    • T-MOBILE LICENSE LLC PALM DESERT 05/14/2008 17845.00000 33-44-08.8 N CA NE 117-02-01.6 W 0003436860 T-MOBILE LICENSE LLC BARSTOW 05/14/2008 11648.12500 34-54-03.9 N CA NE 117-19-19.2 W 0003436862 T-MOBILE LICENSE LLC COLTON 05/14/2008 17855.00000 34-03-49.9 N CA NE 117-12-22.4 W 0003436865 T-MOBILE LICENSE LLC SUN CITY 05/14/2008 19435.00000 33-41-01.7 N CA NE 117-12-08.9 W 0003436869 T-MOBILE LICENSE LLC BARSTOW 05/14/2008 19475.00000 34-42-00.5 N CA NE 117-09-36.8 W 0003436872 T-MOBILE LICENSE LLC SUN CITY 05/14/2008 17875.00000 33-39-36.4 N CA NE 116-13-30.7 W 0003436875 T-MOBILE LICENSE LLC Indio 05/14/2008 19405.00000 33-48-06.2 N CA NE 116-55-54.6 W 0003436878 T-MOBILE LICENSE LLC LUCERNE VALLEY 05/14/2008 11158.12500 34-40-09.2 N PR NE 066-19-57.0 W 0003437141 Centennial Puerto Rico License Corp. Barranquitas 05/14/2008 11662.50000 18-12-05.0 N AZ NE 111-30-15.5
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-282367A1.pdf
    • in the frequency bands used for service downlinks and feederlinks. SAT-STA-20080429-00094 E Special Temporary Authority 04/29/2008 14:43:04:57600 Date Filed: XM Radio Inc. Page 1 of 2 For more information concerning this Notice, contact the Satellite Division at 202-418-0719; TTY 202-418-2555. XM Radio Inc. (XM) requests Special Temporary Authority to operate a terrestrial repeater with an average EIRP not to exceed 0.5 watts at its office building in Vienna, Virginia, for a period of 180 days pursuant to the technical parameters listed in Exhibits A and B to its application. XM states that use of the repeater is necessary to provide XM's signal to its Listener Care center in the building. XM states that it intends to use input and output filters
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-282424A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-282424A1.txt
    • N AZ MD WQCU380 111-53-32.7 W 0003445886 New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC SUN LAKES 05/20/2008 23080.00000 33-13-24.3 N Page 2 CF - Common Carrier Fixed Point to Point Microwave State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City AZ MD WQDK553 111-50-22.1 W 0003445950 New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC CHANDLER 05/20/2008 21930.00000 33-20-00.5 N VA MD WMN216 077-03-01.8 W 0003446180 Cellco Partnership TAPPAHANNOCK 05/21/2008 10775.00000 37-49-18.5 N AZ MD WQBT596 111-50-04.5 W 0003447668 NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS PCS, LLCCHANDLER 05/22/2008 19350.00000 33-18-07.0 N AZ MD WQBT596 111-50-04.5 W 0003447668 NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS PCS, LLCCHANDLER 05/22/2008 23080.00000 33-18-07.0 N AZ MD WQBT598 111-53-22.4 W 0003447673 NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS PCS, LLCCHANDLER 05/22/2008 21880.00000 33-18-08.6 N AZ
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-282626A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-282626A1.txt
    • 0003451242 WBAL HEARST-ARGYLE TV, INC. (CA CBALTIMORE 05/27/2008 02059.00000 - 02076.00000 MD MD KQ5659 O 0003451242 WBAL HEARST-ARGYLE TV, INC. (CA CBALTIMORE 05/27/2008 02076.00000 - 02093.00000 MD MD KQ5659 O 0003451242 WBAL HEARST-ARGYLE TV, INC. (CA CBALTIMORE 05/27/2008 02093.00000 - 02110.00000 MD MD KQ5659 O 0003451242 WBAL HEARST-ARGYLE TV, INC. (CA CBALTIMORE 05/27/2008 02450.00000 - 02483.50000 GA MD KC26152 P 081-50-00.5 W 0003451713 WAGT TELEVISION, INC. Augusta 05/27/2008 01990.00000 - 02110.00000 33-24-20.7 N GA MD KC26152 P 081-50-00.5 W 0003451713 WAGT TELEVISION, INC. Augusta 05/27/2008 01990.00000 - 02110.00000 33-24-20.7 N GA MD KC26152 P 081-50-00.5 W 0003451713 WAGT TELEVISION, INC. Augusta 05/27/2008 01990.00000 - 02110.00000 33-24-20.7 N GA MD KC26152 P 081-50-00.5 W 0003451713 WAGT TELEVISION, INC. Augusta 05/27/2008 02008.00000 -
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-282813A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-282813A1.txt
    • 0.3 125.8 5.0 120.8 41.3 12.6 66.9 120.8 DE District of Columbia 192.0 0.4 191.6 3.9 187.7 40.8 22.9 124.0 187.7 DC Florida 2,797.5 8.3 2,789.2 500.1 2,289.0 839.6 209.3 1,164.3 2,213.2 75.8 FL Georgia 1,154.6 6.2 1,148.4 102.5 1,045.8 284.3 99.2 612.9 996.4 49.3 GA Idaho 194.0 0.4 193.6 27.9 165.7 65.8 17.8 75.7 159.3 6.4 ID Illinois 1,234.4 0.5 1,233.9 191.7 1,042.2 347.8 119.6 542.4 1,009.8 32.4 IL Indiana 670.1 3.4 666.7 121.7 545.0 224.8 53.6 253.9 532.3 12.7 IN Iowa 332.6 0.1 332.5 86.0 246.5 67.8 37.3 132.3 237.4 9.1 IA Kansas 253.2 0.0 253.2 23.5 229.7 56.1 29.4 137.3 222.8 6.9 KS Kentucky 440.9 1.1 439.7 74.8 365.0 145.4 42.1 167.6 355.1 9.8 KY Louisiana 443.0 1.6
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-282830A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-282830A1.txt
    • CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS II Atlanta 06/06/2008 19375.00000 33-52-34.5 N Page 34 MG - Microwave Industrial/Business Pool State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City GA MD WQIR516 084-22-46.9 W 0003464772 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS II Atlanta 06/06/2008 19475.00000 33-52-34.5 N PA MD WNTA321 074-55-06.5 W 0003465038 PECO ENERGY COMPANY BENSALEM 06/06/2008 06660.00000 40-05-00.5 N PA MD WNTA321 074-55-06.5 W 0003465038 PECO ENERGY COMPANY BENSALEM 06/06/2008 06660.00000 40-05-00.5 N PA MD WNTA321 074-55-06.5 W 0003465038 PECO ENERGY COMPANY BENSALEM 06/06/2008 06691.25000 40-05-00.5 N LA MD WNTT701 091-45-10.4 W 0003465208 CENTRAL TELEPHONE CORPORATIONNEW IBERIA 06/06/2008 02186.40000 29-57-12.7 N NE NE 102-59-53.0 W 0003459546 KN Telecommunications, Inc. SIDNEY 06/02/2008 06740.62500 41-09-41.0 N CO NE 102-51-15.0 W
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-283039A1.pdf
    • of 4.8 Terabits per second (Tbps). The proposed system can be expanded to a total of 8 fiber pairs with total capacity of up to 7.68 Tbps. The individual parties will own and manage fiber pairs: Pacnet will have two fiber pairs; GU Holdings will have one fiber pair; and, Bharti Airtel, GTL, KDDI, and SingTel will each have one-half (0.5) fiber pair. The Unity System will land in two locations: Chikura Japan, and either Hermosa Beach, California or Norma Beach, Washington. KDDI owns and operates the landing and terminal facilities in the Chikura landing station, where individual Parties may connect their capacity to Japan's domestic network or other international cable system. GU Holdings will be the U.S. landing party and
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-283198A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-283198A1.txt
    • Microwave State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City MD NE 075-58-54.1 W 0003473229 Cellco Partnership Charlestown 06/16/2008 10622.50000 39-34-38.1 N TX NE 096-43-05.6 W 0003473230 San Antonio MTA, L.P. Fayetteville 06/16/2008 06123.10000 29-50-31.7 N TX NE 096-43-05.6 W 0003473230 San Antonio MTA, L.P. Fayetteville 06/16/2008 06152.75000 29-50-31.7 N TX NE 096-26-00.5 W 0003473231 San Antonio MTA, L.P. BRENHAM 06/16/2008 06345.49000 30-09-48.4 N TX NE 096-52-46.2 W 0003473232 San Antonio MTA, L.P. LaGrange 06/16/2008 06256.54000 29-52-43.7 N TX NE 096-52-46.2 W 0003473232 San Antonio MTA, L.P. LaGrange 06/16/2008 06404.79000 29-52-43.7 N TX NE 096-19-04.9 W 0003473233 San Antonio MTA, L.P. Kenney 06/16/2008 06256.54000 30-02-25.0 N TX NE 096-19-04.9 W 0003473233 San Antonio
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-283200A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-283200A1.txt
    • 114-37-48.0 W 0003477369 NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS PCS, LLCNEEDLES 06/19/2008 06665.62500 34-32-45.2 N CA MD WPTV801 114-38-46.0 W 0003477394 NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS PCS, LLCNeedles 06/19/2008 06550.62500 34-54-47.0 N TX MD WQIC659 096-41-29.8 W 0003477396 San Antonio MTA, L.P. CARMINE 06/19/2008 06197.24000 30-07-09.9 N TX MD WQIC659 096-41-29.8 W 0003477396 San Antonio MTA, L.P. CARMINE 06/19/2008 06345.49000 30-07-09.9 N TX MD WQIC658 096-26-00.5 W 0003477530 San Antonio MTA, L.P. BRENHAM 06/19/2008 06345.49000 30-09-48.4 N TX MD WQIC658 096-26-00.5 W 0003477530 San Antonio MTA, L.P. BRENHAM 06/19/2008 06375.14000 30-09-48.4 N TX MD WQIC657 096-34-08.7 W 0003477562 San Antonio MTA, L.P. BRENHAM 06/19/2008 06093.45000 30-11-19.1 N TX MD WQIC657 096-34-08.7 W 0003477562 San Antonio MTA, L.P. BRENHAM 06/19/2008 06123.10000 30-11-19.1 N TX MD WQHQ476 095-23-49.8
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-283397A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-283397A1.txt
    • Inc. LANCASTER 06/24/2008 17765.00000 40-02-17.4 N PA NE 076-18-21.9 W 0003484993 Telecom Transport Management, Inc. LANCASTER 06/24/2008 17830.00000 40-02-17.4 N PA NE 076-18-21.9 W 0003484993 Telecom Transport Management, Inc. LANCASTER 06/24/2008 22010.00000 40-02-17.4 N PA NE 076-18-21.9 W 0003484993 Telecom Transport Management, Inc. LANCASTER 06/24/2008 22060.00000 40-02-17.4 N PA NE 076-20-04.6 W 0003484996 Telecom Transport Management, Inc. Lancaster 06/24/2008 19325.00000 40-04-00.5 N PA NE 076-20-04.6 W 0003484996 Telecom Transport Management, Inc. Lancaster 06/24/2008 19370.00000 40-04-00.5 N PA NE 076-13-19.9 W 0003484998 Telecom Transport Management, Inc. Smoketown 06/24/2008 11245.00000 40-01-53.0 N PA NE 076-13-19.9 W 0003484998 Telecom Transport Management, Inc. Smoketown 06/24/2008 17970.00000 40-01-53.0 N PA NE 076-18-30.1 W 0003485001 Telecom Transport Management, Inc. Lancaster 06/24/2008 23210.00000 40-01-04.5 N PA NE 076-20-14.3
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-283719A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-283719A1.txt
    • TOKLAHOMA CITY 07/08/2008 02467.00000 - 02483.50000 35-33-45.2 N OK AM KQ5617 P 097-29-25.1 W 0003460762 OHIO/OKLAHOMA HEARST- ARGYLE TOKLAHOMA CITY 07/08/2008 02467.00000 - 02483.50000 35-33-45.2 N OK AM KQ5617 P 097-29-25.1 W 0003460762 OHIO/OKLAHOMA HEARST- ARGYLE TOKLAHOMA CITY 07/08/2008 02467.00000 - 02483.50000 35-33-45.2 N SC MD KC26140 P 080-57-55.3 W 0003496123 PACIFIC AND SOUTHERN COMPANY, INCOLUMBIA 07/08/2008 01990.00000 - 02110.00000 33-59-00.5 N SC MD KC26140 P 080-57-55.3 W 0003496123 PACIFIC AND SOUTHERN COMPANY, INCOLUMBIA 07/08/2008 01990.00000 - 02110.00000 33-59-00.5 N SC MD KC26140 P 080-57-55.3 W 0003496123 PACIFIC AND SOUTHERN COMPANY, INCOLUMBIA 07/08/2008 02008.00000 - 02110.00000 33-59-00.5 N SC MD KC26140 P 080-57-55.3 W 0003496123 PACIFIC AND SOUTHERN COMPANY, INCOLUMBIA 07/08/2008 02025.50000 - 02109.50000 33-59-00.5 N SC MD KC26140 P 080-57-55.3
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-283917A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-283917A1.txt
    • NE NE 097-29-33.2 W 0003505233 NE Colorado Wireless Technologies, Inc.Humphrey 07/16/2008 06197.24000 41-41-44.7 N NE NE 097-29-33.2 W 0003505233 NE Colorado Wireless Technologies, Inc.Humphrey 07/16/2008 06345.49000 41-41-44.7 N NE NE 097-28-47.9 W 0003505234 NE Colorado Wireless Technologies, Inc.Platte Center 07/16/2008 05945.20000 41-32-37.8 N NE NE 097-28-47.9 W 0003505234 NE Colorado Wireless Technologies, Inc.Platte Center 07/16/2008 06004.50000 41-32-37.8 N NE NE 097-22-00.5 W 0003505235 NE Colorado Wireless Technologies, Inc.Columbus (SW) 07/16/2008 06256.54000 41-25-14.5 N NE NE 097-33-07.0 W 0003505236 NE Colorado Wireless Technologies, Inc.Pierce 07/16/2008 05974.85000 42-09-50.0 N NE NE 097-33-07.0 W 0003505236 NE Colorado Wireless Technologies, Inc.Pierce 07/16/2008 06034.15000 42-09-50.0 N NE NE 097-46-37.9 W 0003505237 NE Colorado Wireless Technologies, Inc.Plainview 07/16/2008 06286.19000 42-21-25.4 N AK NE 152-28-16.0 W 0003505365 General
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-284321A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-284321A2.txt
    • 0.0 0.0 0.0100.0 5,334,174 0.7 5.6 2.944.6 46.3 Netherlands $50,465,900 0.019.5 0.4 9.8 70.4 $6,645,802 0.0 0.1 0.064.5 35.4 $4,624,161 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 99.9 580,189,179 0.013.7 0.339.9 46.2 Norway $13,490,830 0.025.0 0.318.1 56.6 $836,925 0.023.9 0.019.3 56.9 $2,538,915 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0100.0 164,594,720 0.019.5 0.630.2 49.8 Portugal $16,390,237 0.015.4 1.424.4 58.7 $1,499,178 0.010.9 0.024.9 64.2 $692,194 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.5 99.5 275,602,651 0.018.1 2.422.4 57.1 Spain $55,695,353 0.128.2 0.712.2 58.9 $4,208,125 0.014.1 0.020.9 65.0 $24,494,336 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0100.0 649,185,545 0.119.9 4.717.8 57.5 Sweden $19,945,001 0.324.5 0.229.9 45.0 $3,851,564 0.028.7 0.023.3 48.0 $9,489,951 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0100.0 429,598,237 0.016.9 0.341.1 41.6 Switzerland $38,491,663 0.044.5 0.314.7 40.5 $2,596,506 0.018.0 0.030.8 51.2 $9,265,495 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0100.0 414,079,134 0.022.7 1.234.3 41.8 Turkey
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-284342A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-284342A1.txt
    • 07/29/2008 10715.00000 40-48-04.2 N IL NE 090-23-54.3 W 0003519943 USCOC OF CENTRAL ILLINOIS, LLC MARIETTA 07/29/2008 06152.75000 40-30-03.4 N IL NE 087-37-26.8 W 0003521089 Towerstream Corp Chicago 07/29/2008 21870.00000 41-53-55.6 N IL NE 087-38-06.8 W 0003521091 Towerstream Corp Chicago 07/29/2008 23070.00000 41-53-56.5 N PR NE 067-12-55.3 W 0003524476 Centennial Puerto Rico License Corp. RINCON 07/30/2008 11632.50000 18-18-36.0 N PA NE 076-44-00.5 W 0003524706 TELECOM TRANSPORT MANAGEMENTHARRISBURG 07/30/2008 19510.00000 40-20-43.9 N PA NE 076-41-00.6 W 0003524708 TELECOM TRANSPORT MANAGEMENTHummelstown 07/30/2008 17950.00000 40-21-01.4 N PA NE 076-39-18.0 W 0003524711 TELECOM TRANSPORT MANAGEMENTHershey 07/30/2008 11605.00000 40-17-03.1 N NE NE 097-41-46.2 W 0003524887 USCOC NEBRASKA/KANSAS, LLC Genoa 07/30/2008 06730.62500 41-20-41.1 N MA NE 071-07-21.3 W 0003524932 NEXTLINK WIRELESS INC. BOSTON 07/30/2008 18085.00000 42-20-25.2 N TX
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-284492A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-284492A1.txt
    • JOURNAL BROADCAST CORPORATIONGreaterville 08/08/2008 07000.00000 - 07025.00000 31-45-32.3 N Page 49 TP - TV Pickup State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City NC AM KN6977 S 0003421549 CHARLOTTE-MECKLENBURG PUBLIC BCHARLOTTE 08/05/2008 02025.00000 - 02110.00000 NC AM KN6977 S 0003421549 CHARLOTTE-MECKLENBURG PUBLIC BCHARLOTTE 08/05/2008 02059.00000 - 02076.00000 SC AM KC26152 P 081-50-00.5 W 0003451713 WAGT TELEVISION, INC. Jackson 08/04/2008 01990.00000 - 02110.00000 33-24-20.7 N SC AM KC26152 P 081-50-00.5 W 0003451713 WAGT TELEVISION, INC. Jackson 08/04/2008 02008.00000 - 02025.00000 33-24-20.7 N SC AM KC26152 P 081-50-00.5 W 0003451713 WAGT TELEVISION, INC. Jackson 08/04/2008 02025.00000 - 02042.00000 33-24-20.7 N SC AM KC26152 P 081-50-00.5 W 0003451713 WAGT TELEVISION, INC. Jackson 08/04/2008 02042.00000 -
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-284575A2.pdf
    • AND PERRY ROADS N OF PAVILION, GENESSEE COUNTY, NY; (42-53-42 78-00-56); ANTENNA SYSTEM: DIELECTRIC, TFU-18DSC P230 PAXSON BUFFALO LICENSE, INC. WPXJ-DT 2325 BPCDT-19990326KE NY , ANN ARBOR CHAN-33 E MI APPLICATION FOR A NEW DIGITAL TELEVISION STATION FOR STATION WPXD, ANN ARBOR, MI; DIGITAL CH-33; ERP(AVG): 190 KW; HAAT: 328 METERS; ANTENNA LOCATION: APPROX. 0.3 KILOMETERS NE OF HWY 52, 0.5 KILOMETERS NW OF STOFER HILL & 7 KILOMETERS NW OF CHELSEA, WASHTENAW COUNTY, MI; (42-22-25 84-04-10) ANTENNA SYSTEM: DIELECTRIC, TUP-05-16- PAXSON COMMUNICATIONS LICENSE COMPANY, LLC WPXD 5800 BPCDT-19990812KH MI Page 3 of 13 Broadcast Actions 8/18/2008 PUBLIC NOTICEFederal Communications Commission 445 Twelfth Street SW Washington, D.C. 20554 Recorded listing of releases and texts202 / 418-2222 202 / 418-0500 News media
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-284659A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-284659A1.txt
    • CALIFORNIA EDISON COM 08/14/2008 RO WNTR667 0003545715 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COM 08/14/2008 RO WNTR669 0003545716 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COM 08/14/2008 RO WHJ743 0003545717 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COM 08/14/2008 CL - Cellular State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City CA AM KNKA401 118-59-43.8 W 0003545700 FRESNO MSA LIMITED PARTNERSHIPLemon Cove 08/15/2008 36-24-00.5 N NY MD KNKA675 073-45-35.9 W 0003545494 Cellco Partnership Lake George 08/14/2008 43-28-23.4 N CA MD KNKA401 118-59-43.8 W 0003545700 FRESNO MSA LIMITED PARTNERSHIPLemon Cove 08/14/2008 36-24-00.5 N CO MD KNKA371 104-47-07.9 W 0003545762 Verizon Wireless (VAW) LLC Colorado Springs 08/14/2008 38-45-41.0 N CA MD KNKN228 118-23-49.4 W 0003546160 Cellco Partnership BISHOP 08/15/2008 37-21-32.7 N CA MD KNKN228 118-09-34.3 W
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-284856A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-284856A1.txt
    • Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City IA MD KJW45 091-40-05.0 W 0003557730 Interstate Power and Light Company CEDAR RAPIDS 08/22/2008 17765.00000 41-58-38.0 N IA MD WNEV801 091-40-59.6 W 0003557754 Interstate Power and Light Company CEDAR RAPIDS 08/22/2008 19325.00000 41-57-54.0 N OR NE 122-41-37.3 W 0003549478 Freewire Broadband LLC Wilsonville 08/18/2008 19320.00000 45-20-38.6 N OR NE 122-55-00.5 W 0003549479 Freewire Broadband LLC Hillsboro 08/18/2008 11285.00000 45-36-47.1 N OR NE 122-55-00.5 W 0003549479 Freewire Broadband LLC Hillsboro 08/18/2008 19475.00000 45-36-47.1 N OR NE 122-59-10.8 W 0003549480 Freewire Broadband LLC Laurel 08/18/2008 10795.00000 45-24-08.5 N OR NE 122-52-50.3 W 0003549481 Freewire Broadband LLC Hillsboro 08/18/2008 17915.00000 45-32-39.3 N NV NE 115-00-32.3 W 0003549751 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS II LAS VEGAS
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-284926A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-284926A1.txt
    • CLEC resources. 14 Table 4 Telephone Number Utilization by State as of December 31, 2007 Assigned Intermediate Reserved Aging Administrative Available1 Total State/jurisdiction 000s % 000s % 000s % 000s % 000s % 000s % 000s Alabama 9,148 42.4 557 2.6 318 1.5 515 2.4 259 1.2 10,779 50.0 21,576 Alaska 1,405 25.9 22 0.4 34 0.6 94 1.7 25 0.5 3,847 70.9 5,427 American Samoa 20 68.1 0 0.0 1 2.8 1 3.3 0 1.6 7 24.2 30 Arizona 12,889 61.9 356 1.7 179 0.9 645 3.1 204 1.0 6,566 31.5 20,838 Arkansas 4,809 33.8 569 4.0 68 0.5 278 2.0 191 1.3 8,297 58.4 14,212 California 78,028 50.4 4,910 3.2 638 0.4 4,237 2.7 2,735 1.8 64,223 41.5 154,771
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-284932A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-284932A1.txt
    • 3.5 130,860,026 3.1 1990 136,114,201 3.5 134,685,732 2.9 1991 139,412,884 2.4 139,613,309 3.7 1992 143,341,581 2.8 142,367,463 2.0 1993 148,106,159 3.3 147,033,132 3.3 1994 153,447,946 3.6 151,543,061 3.1 1995 159,658,662 4.0 158,152,644 4.4 1996 166,445,580 4.3 165,350,308 4.6 1997 173,866,799 4.5 173,857,193 5.1 1998 179,849,045 3.4 180,516,161 3.8 1999 189,397,096 185,002,911 2.9 186,594,497 3.4 2000 192,432,431 1.6% 188,499,586 1.9 187,581,092 0.5 2001 191,570,800 -0.4 185,587,160 -1.5 179,811,283 -4.1 2002 189,250,143 -1.2 180,095,333 -3.0 172,245,846 -4.2 2003 182,933,281 -3.3 173,140,710 -3.9 161,374,473 -6.3 2004 177,690,711 -2.9 165,979,938 -4.1 154,039,066 -4.5 2005 175,160,940 -1.4 157,037,503 -5.4 147,993,264 -3.9 2006 167,504,016 -4.4 146,848,926 -6.5 140,029,044 -5.4 1 Include end-user switched access lines for competitive local exchange carriers (CLECs) and incumbent local exchange carriers (ILECs)
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-285103A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-285103A1.txt
    • 08/26/2008 06286.19000 41-51-49.0 N PA AM 075-48-35.0 W 0003507422 Conterra UltraBroadband, LLC MONTROSE 08/26/2008 11245.00000 41-51-49.0 N PA AM 075-48-35.0 W 0003507422 Conterra UltraBroadband, LLC MONTROSE 08/26/2008 23025.00000 41-51-49.0 N UT AM 109-09-53.4 W 0003507670 WWC Holding Co., Inc VERNAL 08/27/2008 06004.50000 40-00-11.9 N UT AM 109-09-53.4 W 0003507670 WWC Holding Co., Inc VERNAL 08/27/2008 06093.45000 40-00-11.9 N PA AM 076-44-00.5 W 0003524706 TELECOM TRANSPORT MANAGEMENTHARRISBURG 08/25/2008 19510.00000 40-20-43.9 N PA AM 076-44-00.5 W 0003524706 TELECOM TRANSPORT MANAGEMENTHARRISBURG 08/25/2008 22230.00000 40-20-43.9 N OH AM WLM623 080-36-55.6 W 0003528402 Alltel Communications, LLC BROOKFIELD 08/29/2008 05945.20000 41-15-53.5 N OH AM WLM623 080-36-55.6 W 0003528402 Alltel Communications, LLC BROOKFIELD 08/29/2008 06093.45000 41-15-53.5 N OH AM WLM623 080-36-55.6 W 0003528402 Alltel Communications, LLC BROOKFIELD 08/29/2008
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-285239A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-285239A1.txt
    • Shore Acres 09/02/2008 06625.00000 38-01-16.5 N CA NE 121-50-04.5 W 0003566758 enXco, Inc. Birds landing 09/02/2008 06785.00000 38-07-32.8 N CA NE 121-50-04.5 W 0003566758 enXco, Inc. Birds landing 09/02/2008 11623.12500 38-07-32.8 N CA NE 118-24-01.3 W 0003566992 METROPOLITAN AREA NETWORKS, INPacoima 09/03/2008 11115.00000 34-15-25.0 N AL NE 086-53-59.4 W 0003566994 METROPOLITAN AREA NETWORKS, INElkmont 09/03/2008 10795.00000 34-56-59.3 N NV NE 115-05-00.5 W 0003567071 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS II HENDERSON 09/03/2008 21825.00000 36-03-10.9 N NV NE 115-05-00.5 W 0003567071 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS II HENDERSON 09/03/2008 21875.00000 36-03-10.9 N NV NE 115-05-00.5 W 0003567071 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS II HENDERSON 09/03/2008 21925.00000 36-03-10.9 N NV NE 115-05-00.5 W 0003567071 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS II HENDERSON 09/03/2008 21975.00000 36-03-10.9 N NV NE 115-03-19.0 W 0003567072 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-285915A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-285915A1.txt
    • CORP. NEW YORK 10/01/2008 11365.00000 40-46-02.1 N NY NE 073-59-26.8 W 0003596738 AT&T CORP. NEW YORK 10/01/2008 22010.00000 40-46-02.1 N NJ NE 074-00-43.3 W 0003596739 AT&T CORP. GUTTENBURG 10/01/2008 23210.00000 40-47-42.0 N NJ NE 074-08-48.4 W 0003596740 AT&T CORP. CLIFTON 10/01/2008 10875.00000 40-50-08.5 N OR NE 121-37-19.8 W 0003596844 UNITED STATES CELLULAR OPERATINLa Pine 10/01/2008 10563.75000 43-41-59.0 N WA NE 124-03-00.5 W 0003596874 MCDANIEL CELLULAR TELEPHONE COIIWACO 10/01/2008 10563.75000 46-18-45.0 N FL NE 085-38-27.6 W 0003597211 Southern Company Services, Inc. Panama City 10/01/2008 11055.00000 30-10-24.8 N FL NE 085-50-00.8 W 0003597214 Southern Company Services, Inc. Panama City Beach 10/01/2008 11545.00000 30-11-41.7 N Page 17 CF - Common Carrier Fixed Point to Point Microwave State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-286037A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-286037A1.txt
    • N OR MD WQCD552 123-39-38.2 W 0003606014 USCOC OF OREGON RSA #5, INC. CAVE JUNCTION 10/08/2008 10626.25000 42-15-28.4 N WV MD WPJF790 080-30-26.5 W 0003606021 HARDY CELLULAR TELEPHONE COMPSALEM 10/08/2008 06785.00000 39-16-27.6 N WV MD WPJF790 080-30-26.5 W 0003606021 HARDY CELLULAR TELEPHONE COMPSALEM 10/08/2008 06805.00000 39-16-27.6 N WV MD WPJF791 080-22-14.4 W 0003606023 HARDY CELLULAR TELEPHONE COMPLOST CREEK 10/08/2008 06417.14000 39-08-00.5 N WV MD WPJF791 080-22-14.4 W 0003606023 HARDY CELLULAR TELEPHONE COMPLOST CREEK 10/08/2008 06625.00000 39-08-00.5 N WV MD WPJF791 080-22-14.4 W 0003606023 HARDY CELLULAR TELEPHONE COMPLOST CREEK 10/08/2008 11622.50000 39-08-00.5 N CA MD WPWJ539 115-29-56.0 W 0003606426 Cellco Partnership EL CENTRO 10/09/2008 10755.00000 32-47-45.0 N OH MD WLM217 082-58-54.6 W 0003606514 New Par WORTHINGTON 10/09/2008 02115.20000 40-06-54.2 N OH MD
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-286358A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-286358A1.txt
    • Intermountain Health Care Logan 10/20/2008 17820.00000 41-45-20.5 N UT NE 112-13-57.8 W 0003615733 Intermountain Health Care Tremonton 10/20/2008 19380.00000 41-47-02.5 N UT NE 112-13-57.8 W 0003615733 Intermountain Health Care Tremonton 10/20/2008 19540.00000 41-47-02.5 N UT NE 112-10-54.9 W 0003615734 Intermountain Health Care Brigham City 10/20/2008 17980.00000 41-43-29.7 N GA NE 084-22-25.0 W 0003616139 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS II ATLANTA 10/21/2008 17920.00000 33-42-00.5 N GA NE 084-22-25.0 W 0003616139 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS II ATLANTA 10/21/2008 23020.00000 33-42-00.5 N GA NE 084-21-10.8 W 0003616141 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS II ATLANTA 10/21/2008 17840.00000 33-46-27.1 N GA NE 084-21-10.8 W 0003616141 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS II ATLANTA 10/21/2008 17960.00000 33-46-27.1 N GA NE 084-21-10.8 W 0003616141 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS II ATLANTA 10/21/2008 21875.00000 33-46-27.1 N GA NE 084-21-10.8
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-286554A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-286554A1.txt
    • City CA AM KHP23 120-35-46.7 W 0003556196 PLACER COUNTY WATER AGENCY FORESTHILL 10/28/2008 02141.20000 39-01-28.6 N CA AM KHP23 120-35-46.7 W 0003556196 PLACER COUNTY WATER AGENCY FORESTHILL 10/28/2008 06750.62500 39-01-28.6 N TX AM 095-30-08.6 W 0003607997 Franklin Group Inc. HOUSTON 10/30/2008 11525.00000 29-38-02.0 N TX AM WQIF898 095-22-18.6 W 0003607999 Franklin Group Inc. Houston 10/30/2008 11175.00000 29-44-57.4 N TX AM 095-31-00.5 W 0003608003 Franklin Group Inc. HOUSTON 10/30/2008 10815.00000 29-42-06.8 N TX AM 095-31-00.5 W 0003608003 Franklin Group Inc. HOUSTON 10/30/2008 11035.00000 29-42-06.8 N TX AM 095-25-54.7 W 0003608004 Franklin Group Inc. HOUSTON 10/30/2008 11305.00000 29-43-50.9 N TX AM 095-25-54.7 W 0003608004 Franklin Group Inc. HOUSTON 10/30/2008 11665.00000 29-43-50.9 N Page 19 MG - Microwave Industrial/Business Pool State Purpose Call Sign
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-286683A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-286683A1.txt
    • Carolina Power & Light Company d/b/a PrRoxboro 11/03/2008 06345.49000 36-31-40.5 N NC MD WHC508 078-53-30.0 W 0003634878 Carolina Power & Light Company d/b/a PrRoxboro 11/03/2008 06845.00000 36-31-40.5 N NC MD WHC508 078-53-30.0 W 0003634878 Carolina Power & Light Company d/b/a PrRoxboro 11/03/2008 06865.00000 36-31-40.5 N NC MD WEE966 079-04-16.0 W 0003634880 Carolina Power & Light Company d/b/a PrROXBORO 11/03/2008 06093.45000 36-29-00.5 N NC MD WEE966 079-04-16.0 W 0003634880 Carolina Power & Light Company d/b/a PrROXBORO 11/03/2008 06705.00000 36-29-00.5 N OR MD WNTF927 119-59-55.1 W 0003635074 PACIFICORP HEPPNER JUNCTIO 11/03/2008 00953.95000 45-45-48.4 N OR MD WNTF927 119-59-55.1 W 0003635074 PACIFICORP HEPPNER JUNCTIO 11/03/2008 00959.30000 45-45-48.4 N UT MD KCR27 111-53-24.7 W 0003635174 PACIFICORP SALT LAKE CITY 11/03/2008 06197.24000 40-48-29.8 N UT MD
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-286957A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-286957A1.txt
    • W 0003652511 Alltel Communications, LLC CULLODEN 11/17/2008 38-26-40.0 N KY MD KNKA393 082-50-28.1 W 0003652511 Alltel Communications, LLC GREENUP 11/17/2008 38-34-08.8 N WV MD KNKA393 082-24-05.5 W 0003652511 Alltel Communications, LLC HUNTINGTON 11/17/2008 38-25-10.3 N OH MD KNKA393 082-35-33.6 W 0003652511 Alltel Communications, LLC OAKHILL 11/17/2008 38-47-04.4 N KY MD KNKA393 082-53-28.9 W 0003652511 Alltel Communications, LLC South Shore 11/17/2008 38-43-00.5 N WV MD KNKA393 082-27-03.7 W 0003652511 Alltel Communications, LLC Wayne 11/17/2008 38-13-30.8 N Page 40 CL - Cellular State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City WV MD KNKA393 082-25-09.5 W 0003652511 Alltel Communications, LLC WAYNE 11/17/2008 38-16-25.3 N KY MD KNKA393 082-41-29.0 W 0003652511 Alltel Communications, LLC WORTHINGTON 11/17/2008
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-286958A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-286958A1.txt
    • W 0003652676 ALLTEL Wireless of Michigan RSA #1 andESCANABA 11/18/2008 45-46-47.3 N MI MD KNKQ320 085-41-03.3 W 0003652676 ALLTEL Wireless of Michigan RSA #1 andGOULD CITY 11/18/2008 46-05-57.4 N MI MD KNKQ320 085-59-36.0 W 0003652676 ALLTEL Wireless of Michigan RSA #1 andGRAND MARAIS 11/18/2008 46-38-29.0 N MI MD KNKQ320 086-00-42.5 W 0003652676 ALLTEL Wireless of Michigan RSA #1 andGulliver 11/18/2008 46-01-00.5 N MI MD KNKQ320 084-28-04.3 W 0003652676 ALLTEL Wireless of Michigan RSA #1 andKinross 11/18/2008 46-15-47.2 N MI MD KNKQ320 084-37-18.7 W 0003652676 ALLTEL Wireless of Michigan RSA #1 andMackinac Island 11/18/2008 45-50-53.2 N MI MD KNKQ320 086-46-25.9 W 0003652676 ALLTEL Wireless of Michigan RSA #1 andMunising 11/18/2008 46-26-27.4 N MI MD KNKQ320 086-38-06.0 W 0003652676 ALLTEL Wireless of Michigan
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287094A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287094A1.txt
    • Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City MI AM KNKQ320 085-41-03.3 W 0003652676 ALLTEL Wireless of Michigan RSA #1 andGOULD CITY 11/25/2008 46-05-57.4 N MI AM KNKQ320 085-59-36.0 W 0003652676 ALLTEL Wireless of Michigan RSA #1 andGRAND MARAIS 11/25/2008 46-38-29.0 N MI AM KNKQ320 086-00-42.5 W 0003652676 ALLTEL Wireless of Michigan RSA #1 andGulliver 11/25/2008 46-01-00.5 N MI AM KNKQ320 084-28-04.3 W 0003652676 ALLTEL Wireless of Michigan RSA #1 andKinross 11/25/2008 46-15-47.2 N MI AM KNKQ320 084-37-18.7 W 0003652676 ALLTEL Wireless of Michigan RSA #1 andMackinac Island 11/25/2008 45-50-53.2 N MI AM KNKQ320 086-46-25.9 W 0003652676 ALLTEL Wireless of Michigan RSA #1 andMunising 11/25/2008 46-26-27.4 N MI AM KNKQ320 086-38-06.0 W 0003652676 ALLTEL Wireless of Michigan
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287096A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287096A1.txt
    • CONSERVRED ROCK 11/24/2008 10588.12500 32-35-15.1 N AZ MD WNEW719 111-11-54.4 W 0003658948 CENTRAL ARIZONA WATER CONSERVMARANA 11/24/2008 10578.75000 32-23-12.0 N AZ MD WNEW719 111-11-54.4 W 0003658948 CENTRAL ARIZONA WATER CONSERVMARANA 11/24/2008 11178.12500 32-23-12.0 N AZ MD WNEW721 111-14-45.0 W 0003658949 CENTRAL ARIZONA WATER CONSERVTUCSON 11/24/2008 06595.62500 32-18-07.1 N AZ MD WNEF378 112-04-06.2 W 0003658951 CENTRAL ARIZONA WATER CONSERVPHOENIX 11/24/2008 06595.00000 33-42-00.5 N AZ MD WNEF378 112-04-06.2 W 0003658951 CENTRAL ARIZONA WATER CONSERVPHOENIX 11/24/2008 06815.00000 33-42-00.5 N AZ MD WNEF378 112-04-06.2 W 0003658951 CENTRAL ARIZONA WATER CONSERVPHOENIX 11/24/2008 11245.00000 33-42-00.5 N AZ MD WNEF376 111-23-25.3 W 0003658952 CENTRAL ARIZONA WATER CONSERVMARANA 11/24/2008 06625.00000 32-19-10.2 N AZ MD WNEF376 111-23-25.3 W 0003658952 CENTRAL ARIZONA WATER CONSERVMARANA 11/24/2008 06740.62500 32-19-10.2 N AZ MD WNEF376
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287358A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287358A1.txt
    • Commission Blaine 12/08/2008 00132.40000 45-08-14.9 N NY NE 076-07-23.2 W 0003669350 Piedmont Hawthorne Aviation LLC. DBA LSyracuse 12/08/2008 00122.95000 43-06-19.0 N FL NE 080-05-06.7 W 0003670932 Palm Beach, County Of Lantana 12/09/2008 00122.70000 26-35-20.5 N KY NE 084-38-21.9 W 0003673782 Delta AirElite Jet Center Covington 12/11/2008 00122.95000 39-02-31.1 N LA NE 093-18-01.6 W 0003674711 Minden, City of Minden 12/11/2008 00122.80000 32-39-00.5 N Page 1 AF - Aeronautical and Fixed State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City GA NE 084-11-14.1 W 0003675641 Piedmont Hawthorne Aviation LLC. DBA LAlbany 12/12/2008 00122.95000 31-31-55.3 N RO WLA4 0003669527 Wellington Municipal Airport 12/08/2008 RO KLV7 0003671050 NASSAU COUNTY OF 12/09/2008 RO KOK6 0003671518 GLYNN COUNTY AIRPORT
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287688A1.pdf
    • Safety-Valve 1 0.0 3 0.0 High-Cost Model Support 358 5.4 346 5.0 Long Term Support 4 0.1 0 0.0 Interstate Common Line Support 1,266 19.1 1,392 20.0 Interstate Access Support 681 10.3 645 9.3 Local Switching Support 448 6.8 460 6.6 Low-Income Support 820 12.4 823 11.8 School and Libraries 1,669 25.2 1,808 26.0 Rural Health Care 41 0.6 37 0.5 All Universal Service Support $6,626 100.0% $6,955 100.0% Disbursements Distribution of Universal Service Payments: 2007 Chart 1.1 Table 1.11 Universal Service Support Mechanisms: 2006 & 2007 (Dollars in Millions) Source: Universal Service Administration Company (USAC). Disbursements 2006 2007 Notes: Figures may not add due to rounding. The figures used in this table are for the calendar year and include disbursements
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287688A11.pdf
    • Commitments Met 98.4 96.8 99.2 99.2 99.7 99.6 98.9 98.1 97.9 Residence 98.4 98.2 99.3 99.2 99.7 99.6 99.0 98.3 98.1 Business 98.3 87.7 99.1 98.8 99.5 98.9 98.1 96.9 95.4 Average Installation Interval (days) 1.7 1.4 1.4 1.1 1.3 0.1 1.4 1.5 0.9 Residence 1.7 1.4 1.3 1.0 0.8 0.1 1.5 1.4 0.8 Business 1.8 1.4 1.8 1.6 3.1 0.5 1.4 2.0 2.2 Average Out of Service Repair Interval (hours) 21.7 18.0 30.9 30.3 21.6 16.3 25.1 39.3 22.4 Residence 22.3 19.8 32.1 31.2 22.2 17.0 26.4 44.3 24.0 Business 18.5 10.6 23.8 25.3 17.7 13.8 20.6 15.4 13.1 Initial Trouble Reports per Thousand Lines 164.7 241.6 101.2 220.8 147.4 107.7 175.7 156.1 163.4 Total MSA 165.3 233.7 100.3 216.3
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287688A3.pdf
    • Safety-Valve 1 0.0 3 0.0 High-Cost Model Support 358 5.4 346 5.0 Long Term Support 4 0.1 0 0.0 Interstate Common Line Support 1,266 19.1 1,392 20.0 Interstate Access Support 681 10.3 645 9.3 Local Switching Support 448 6.8 460 6.6 Low-Income Support 820 12.4 823 11.8 School and Libraries 1,669 25.2 1,808 26.0 Rural Health Care 41 0.6 37 0.5 All Universal Service Support $6,626 100.0% $6,955 100.0% Disbursements Distribution of Universal Service Payments: 2007 Chart 1.1 Table 1.11 Universal Service Support Mechanisms: 2006 & 2007 (Dollars in Millions) Source: Universal Service Administration Company (USAC). Disbursements 2006 2007 Notes: Figures may not add due to rounding. The figures used in this table are for the calendar year and include disbursements
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287688A5.pdf
    • Total 56 126 183 500 602 757 9151028107211321188126316901718223525922935326534683796411042874428 19861987198819891990199119921993199419951996199719981999200020012002200320042005200620072008 3 - 14 YearCompaniesHigh-Cost Loop Support Safety Net Additive Support Safety Valve Support High-Cost Model Support Long- Term Support Interstate Common Line Support Interstate Access Support Local Switching Support Total Support ILECs 864.2 - - - 472.9 - - 380.3 1,717.4 1999 CETCs 0.1 - - - 0.4 - - 0.0 0.5 Total 864.3 - - - 473.3 - - 380.3 1,718.0 ILECs 873.8 - - 218.7 477.3 - 278.8 384.7 2,233.3 2000 CETCs 0.4 - - 0.0 1.1 - 0.0 0.0 1.5 Total 874.1 - - 218.7 478.4 - 278.8 384.7 2,234.8 ILECs 921.5 - - 205.4 484.2 - 575.7 387.9 2,574.7 2001 CETCs 5.7 - - 0.3 8.0 - 1.0
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287688A8.pdf
    • 94.9 91.6 -3.3 Florida 88.7 93.6 4.9 * Georgia 86.2 92.6 6.4 * Hawaii 93.5 96.0 2.5 Idaho 90.7 96.4 5.7 * Illinois 94.2 94.1 -0.1 Indiana 91.6 90.4 -1.2 Iowa 96.2 97.0 0.8 Kansas 94.3 96.2 1.8 Kentucky 88.1 94.4 6.2 * Louisiana 89.7 94.9 5.2 * Maine 93.4 96.6 3.2 * Maryland 95.7 95.5 -0.1 Massachusetts 95.9 96.3 0.5 Michigan 92.8 95.0 2.2 Minnesota 95.8 97.9 2.0 Mississippi 82.4 90.5 8.1 * Missouri 91.5 96.1 4.6 * Montana 91.0 95.4 4.4 * Nebraska 95.7 93.7 -2.0 Nevada 90.4 95.2 4.9 * New Hampshire 94.3 96.8 2.5 * New Jersey 94.8 95.7 0.9 New Mexico 82.0 91.6 9.6 * New York 91.8 93.4 1.6 North Carolina 88.3 94.5 6.3 *
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287688A9.pdf
    • 15.6 14.6 15.9 6.2 8.0 1982 10.8 9.0 2.7 3.9 4.2 1.7 1983 3.1 0.2 1.4 0.0 7.4 3.9 1984 17.2 10.4 -4.3 -5.1 3.6 3.8 1985 8.9 12.4 -3.7 -3.0 0.6 2.1 1986 7.1 8.9 -9.4 -10.0 0.3 -3.5 1987 3.3 2.6 -12.4 -11.8 -3.0 -3.0 1988 4.5 4.6 -4.2 -2.1 -4.2 -3.8 1989 0.6 1.9 -1.3 -1.7 -2.6 0.5 1990 1.0 1.5 -3.7 -0.1 -2.2 -2.2 1991 5.1 2.1 1.3 -1.3 -1.5 -2.6 1992 0.5 -0.2 -1.3 1.0 -2.4 1.3 1993 1.0 0.8 6.5 3.8 0.2 -1.1 1994 -0.3 0.7 5.4 6.1 -1.0 -1.4 1995 2.6 ** 0.1 ** -3.8 ** 1996 0.9 0.2 3.7 0.8 6.1 0.9 1997 1.0 0.1 -4.3 7.8 2.8 -4.3 1998 1.3 0.0 -0.8
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287839A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287839A1.txt
    • W 0003695852 Northrop Grumman Information TechnologBrooklyn 01/08/2009 22075.00000 40-37-04.3 N IN MD KBU99 086-00-05.9 W 0003695970 INDIANAPOLIS POWER AND LIGHT COINDIANAPOLIS 01/08/2009 02146.00000 39-40-53.1 N IN MD KBU99 086-00-05.9 W 0003695970 INDIANAPOLIS POWER AND LIGHT COINDIANAPOLIS 01/08/2009 11623.75000 39-40-53.1 N NY MD WNTR470 073-59-44.5 W 0003696889 NEW YORK UNIVERSITY NEW YORK 01/08/2009 18142.00000 - 18580.00000 40-43-46.3 N NY MD WNTV908 074-00-00.5 W 0003696943 NEW YORK UNIVERSITY NEW YORK 01/08/2009 18142.00000 - 18502.00000 40-43-48.3 N NY MD WNTV904 073-59-30.5 W 0003696968 NEW YORK UNIVERSITY NEW YORK 01/08/2009 18142.00000 - 18502.00000 40-43-56.3 N NY MD WPWF765 073-59-53.5 W 0003696973 NEW YORK UNIVERSITY NEW YORK 01/08/2009 18142.00000 - 18580.00000 40-43-36.3 N WV MD WNTA664 080-32-48.2 W 0003696998 Allegheny Power WEIRTON 01/08/2009 02191.20000 40-24-03.2 N
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-288105A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-288105A1.txt
    • 37-23-09.5 N VA RM KLF629 077-24-30.0 W 0003699337 USA Mobility Wireless, Inc. CHESTER 01/12/2009 00158.70000 37-20-23.0 N VA RM KLF629 077-15-16.9 W 0003699337 USA Mobility Wireless, Inc. CHRISTEL 01/12/2009 00158.70000 37-44-32.5 N VA RM KLF629 078-24-19.0 W 0003699337 USA Mobility Wireless, Inc. Danville 01/12/2009 00158.70000 36-34-16.0 N VA RM KLF629 077-17-43.9 W 0003699337 USA Mobility Wireless, Inc. HOPEWELL 01/12/2009 00158.70000 37-17-00.5 N VA RM KLF629 077-18-13.9 W 0003699337 USA Mobility Wireless, Inc. HOPEWELL 01/12/2009 00158.70000 37-17-23.5 N VA RM KLF629 077-23-59.9 W 0003699337 USA Mobility Wireless, Inc. PETERSBURG 01/12/2009 00152.24000 37-10-27.5 N VA RM KLF629 077-23-59.9 W 0003699337 USA Mobility Wireless, Inc. PETERSBURG 01/12/2009 00158.70000 37-10-27.5 N Page 3 CD - Paging and Radiotelephone State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op.
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-288352A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-288352A1.txt
    • WA MD WLK850 123-02-52.7 W 0003730454 WHIDBEY TELEPHONE COMPANY MAPLE BEACH 02/06/2009 06404.79000 48-59-39.3 N WA MD WLK849 122-50-28.6 W 0003730455 WHIDBEY TELEPHONE COMPANY EASTSOUND 02/06/2009 05945.20000 48-40-47.3 N WA MD WLK849 122-50-28.6 W 0003730455 WHIDBEY TELEPHONE COMPANY EASTSOUND 02/06/2009 06063.80000 48-40-47.3 N WA MD WLK849 122-50-28.6 W 0003730455 WHIDBEY TELEPHONE COMPANY EASTSOUND 02/06/2009 06093.45000 48-40-47.3 N WA MD WGX509 122-27-00.5 W 0003730456 WHIDBEY TELEPHONE COMPANY LANGLEY 02/06/2009 06197.24000 48-00-27.3 N WA MD WGX509 122-27-00.5 W 0003730456 WHIDBEY TELEPHONE COMPANY LANGLEY 02/06/2009 06315.84000 48-00-27.3 N RI MD WQJW457 071-25-08.2 W 0003730922 Towerstream Corp Broadway 02/06/2009 11445.00000 41-49-15.0 N RI MD WQJW807 071-27-12.2 W 0003730931 Towerstream Corp Cransto 02/06/2009 11305.00000 41-44-31.3 N TX MD WQJW820 096-47-34.7 W 0003730978 Towerstream Corp Dallas 02/06/2009
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-288533A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-288533A1.txt
    • COMCORONA 02/11/2009 17745.00000 33-47-54.0 N CA MD WHJ741 117-37-23.1 W 0003735857 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMCORONA 02/11/2009 19360.00000 33-47-54.0 N AZ MD WQAZ841 111-37-45.6 W 0003735882 CNG COMMUNICATIONS, INC. FLAGSTAFF 02/11/2009 19380.00000 35-11-50.0 N AZ MD WQAZ841 111-37-45.6 W 0003735882 CNG COMMUNICATIONS, INC. FLAGSTAFF 02/11/2009 19680.00000 35-11-50.0 N WA MD WHF503 119-19-09.6 W 0003736699 NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS PCS, LLCRICHLAND 02/11/2009 06152.75000 46-14-00.5 N WA MD WHF503 119-19-09.6 W 0003736699 NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS PCS, LLCRICHLAND 02/11/2009 06640.00000 46-14-00.5 N WA MD WHF503 119-19-09.6 W 0003736699 NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS PCS, LLCRICHLAND 02/11/2009 17840.00000 46-14-00.5 N WA MD WHF503 119-19-09.6 W 0003736699 NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS PCS, LLCRICHLAND 02/11/2009 17950.00000 46-14-00.5 N WA MD WHF503 119-19-09.6 W 0003736699 NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS PCS, LLCRICHLAND 02/11/2009 17965.00000 46-14-00.5
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-288793A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-288793A1.txt
    • RAILROAD COMPANYSANDERSON 02/20/2009 00928.53125 30-07-55.6 N TX NE 102-23-55.5 W 0003744753 UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANYSANDERSON 02/20/2009 00952.53125 30-07-55.6 N WY NE 104-06-00.0 W 0003744788 UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANYALBIN 02/20/2009 00928.71875 41-28-41.0 N WY NE 104-06-00.0 W 0003744788 UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANYALBIN 02/20/2009 00952.71875 41-28-41.0 N TX NE 095-28-55.7 W 0003745165 Franklin Group Inc. HOUSTON 02/20/2009 11465.00000 29-44-56.8 N TX NE 095-31-00.5 W 0003745171 Franklin Group Inc. HOUSTON 02/20/2009 10975.00000 29-42-06.8 N AK NE 150-55-27.7 W 0003745173 ConocoPhillips Communications Inc. Alipine 02/20/2009 06226.89000 70-20-39.8 N AK NE 150-11-23.2 W 0003745216 ConocoPhillips Communications Inc Alpine 02/20/2009 05974.85000 70-23-40.3 N TX NE 097-27-17.0 W 0003745479 Guadalupe Valley Electric Cooperative, InGonzales 02/20/2009 06197.24000 29-31-11.0 N TX NE 097-31-41.0 W 0003745698 Guadalupe Valley Electric Cooperative, InCost
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-288978A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-288978A1.txt
    • 02/25/2009 06695.00000 40-09-48.2 N IN MD WNEM823 087-19-09.1 W 0003753962 NORTHERN INDIANA PUBLIC SERVICEGARY 02/26/2009 11621.25000 41-35-18.1 N IN MD KSH40 087-17-58.1 W 0003753966 NORTHERN INDIANA PUBLIC SERVICEGARY 02/26/2009 11131.25000 41-35-30.1 N KS MD WPOR340 097-19-56.6 W 0003754498 U S D 259 WICHITA 02/26/2009 23070.00000 37-41-43.9 N KS MD WPOR280 097-19-21.4 W 0003754511 U S D 259 WICHITA 02/26/2009 21870.00000 37-42-00.5 N MA NE 071-06-49.3 W 0003751760 BOSTON CATHOLIC TELEVISION CENTMilton 02/24/2009 05974.85000 42-12-42.6 N MA NE 071-06-49.3 W 0003751760 BOSTON CATHOLIC TELEVISION CENTMilton 02/24/2009 10775.00000 42-12-42.6 N MA NE 071-13-05.0 W 0003751761 BOSTON CATHOLIC TELEVISION CENTANDOVER 02/24/2009 06315.84000 42-39-18.0 N MA NE 071-13-05.0 W 0003751761 BOSTON CATHOLIC TELEVISION CENTANDOVER 02/24/2009 11175.00000 42-39-18.0 N UT NE 112-02-29.0 W 0003752345 CENTRAL WEBER
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-288979A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-288979A1.txt
    • W 0003652676 ALLTEL Wireless of Michigan RSA #1 andESCANABA 02/23/2009 45-46-47.3 N MI AM KNKQ320 085-41-03.3 W 0003652676 ALLTEL Wireless of Michigan RSA #1 andGOULD CITY 02/23/2009 46-05-57.4 N MI AM KNKQ320 085-59-36.0 W 0003652676 ALLTEL Wireless of Michigan RSA #1 andGRAND MARAIS 02/23/2009 46-38-29.0 N MI AM KNKQ320 086-00-42.5 W 0003652676 ALLTEL Wireless of Michigan RSA #1 andGulliver 02/23/2009 46-01-00.5 N MI AM KNKQ320 084-28-04.3 W 0003652676 ALLTEL Wireless of Michigan RSA #1 andKinross 02/23/2009 46-15-47.2 N MI AM KNKQ320 084-37-18.7 W 0003652676 ALLTEL Wireless of Michigan RSA #1 andMackinac Island 02/23/2009 45-50-53.2 N MI AM KNKQ320 086-46-25.9 W 0003652676 ALLTEL Wireless of Michigan RSA #1 andMunising 02/23/2009 46-26-27.4 N MI AM KNKQ320 086-38-06.0 W 0003652676 ALLTEL Wireless of Michigan
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-289105A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-289105A1.txt
    • Inc. ROSEBURG 03/03/2009 06826.25000 43-12-04.0 N OR MD WMR738 123-23-00.0 W 0003759116 USCOC of Oregon RSA #5, Inc. ROSEBURG 03/03/2009 06835.62500 43-12-04.0 N OR MD WMR738 123-23-00.0 W 0003759116 USCOC of Oregon RSA #5, Inc. ROSEBURG 03/03/2009 06856.25000 43-12-04.0 N OR MD WMR738 123-23-00.0 W 0003759116 USCOC of Oregon RSA #5, Inc. ROSEBURG 03/03/2009 10618.75000 43-12-04.0 N OR MD WMN740 123-49-00.5 W 0003759151 Verizon Wireless (VAW) LLC ASTORIA 03/03/2009 06197.24000 46-10-53.3 N OR MD WMN740 123-49-00.5 W 0003759151 Verizon Wireless (VAW) LLC ASTORIA 03/03/2009 06645.00000 46-10-53.3 N NC MD WLS725 077-13-52.8 W 0003759609 USCOC OF GREATER NORTH CAROLINTUSCARORA 03/04/2009 06152.75000 35-08-24.6 N NC MD WLS725 077-13-52.8 W 0003759609 USCOC OF GREATER NORTH CAROLINTUSCARORA 03/04/2009 06197.24000 35-08-24.6 N NC MD WLS725 077-13-52.8
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-289167A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-289167A1.txt
    • Avg. AT&T BellSouth Weighted AT&T Avg. (excluding BellSouth) Qwest 19 ARMIS 43-05 Report 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 AT&T Ameritech 2.1 1.5 1.4 1.4 1.5 1.7 AT&T BellSouth 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.3 1.3 1.4 AT&T Pacific 1.2 1.5 1.6 1.5 1.6 1.3 AT&T Southwestern 1.8 1.9 2.0 2.1 1.1 1.0 AT&T SNET 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.1 0.8 Qwest 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.1 Verizon GTE 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.9 0.9 0.8 Verizon North (Combined with Verizon South) Verizon South 1.0 1.1 1.1 1.0 1.3 1.4 Embarq (formerly Sprint) 1.5 1.4 1.7 1.7 1.8 1.6 Weighted BOC/Embarq Composite* 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 * Weighted composite is calculated using access line counts. Chart 5A Average Residential Installation Interval
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-289169A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-289169A1.txt
    • 94.7 7.8 * Louisiana 88.9 95.9 6.9 Maine 90.7 97.6 6.9 * Maryland 96.3 93.3 -2.9 Massachusetts 94.3 96.7 2.4 Michigan 93.8 96.0 2.2 Minnesota 96.4 98.3 2.0 Mississippi 82.4 93.0 10.7 * Missouri 92.1 97.0 4.9 * Montana 92.8 94.9 2.1 Nebraska 94.0 95.6 1.6 Nevada 89.4 95.8 6.4 * New Hampshire 95.0 98.2 3.2 New Jersey 94.1 94.6 0.5 New Mexico 85.3 92.4 7.1 New York 90.8 94.3 3.4 * North Carolina 89.3 94.5 5.2 * North Dakota 95.1 98.8 3.7 Ohio 92.2 97.0 4.8 * Oklahoma 91.5 95.1 3.6 Oregon 91.2 97.5 6.3 * Pennsylvania 95.1 97.6 2.5 Rhode Island 93.3 97.3 4.0 South Carolina 81.8 90.1 8.3 * South Dakota 92.7 97.8 5.1 * Tennessee 87.6 93.1
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-289173A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-289173A1.txt
    • CLEC resources. 14 Table 4 Telephone Number Utilization by State as of June 30, 2008 Assigned Intermediate Reserved Aging Administrative Available1 Total State/jurisdiction 000s % 000s % 000s % 000s % 000s % 000s % 000s Alabama 9,348 42.8 584 2.7 128 0.6 601 2.8 333 1.5 10,840 49.6 21,835 Alaska 1,472 26.4 6 0.1 185 3.3 87 1.6 30 0.5 3,806 68.1 5,585 American Samoa 20 67.9 0 0.0 1 2.8 1 3.3 0 1.6 7 24.5 30 Arizona 13,075 63.0 98 0.5 186 0.9 707 3.4 211 1.0 6,483 31.2 20,760 Arkansas 4,981 34.7 486 3.4 68 0.5 302 2.1 168 1.2 8,333 58.1 14,338 California 81,155 52.4 2,019 1.3 896 0.6 4,532 2.9 2,818 1.8 63,320 40.9 154,739
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-289324A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-289324A1.txt
    • CCPR SERVICES INC. MAYAGUEZ 03/10/2009 11642.50000 18-10-58.6 N CO NE 107-54-57.8 W 0003766618 Questar Infocomm Incorporated Rifle 03/10/2009 06776.25000 39-43-09.2 N CO NE 107-22-50.1 W 0003766628 Questar Infocomm Incorporated Glenwood Springs 03/10/2009 06616.25000 39-25-34.3 N CO NE 107-22-50.1 W 0003766628 Questar Infocomm Incorporated Glenwood Springs 03/10/2009 06683.75000 39-25-34.3 N CO NE 107-49-25.6 W 0003766636 Questar Infocomm Incorporated Rifle 03/10/2009 06843.75000 39-32-00.5 N CO NE 107-57-02.3 W 0003767119 STELERA WIRELESS, LLC CEDAREDGE 03/11/2009 11225.00000 38-58-24.6 N TX NE 095-39-39.4 W 0003767293 GTE Mobilnet of South Texas Limited PartHouston 03/11/2009 05945.20000 29-42-32.2 N TX NE 095-39-39.4 W 0003767293 GTE Mobilnet of South Texas Limited PartHouston 03/11/2009 05974.85000 29-42-32.2 N TX NE 095-39-39.4 W 0003767293 GTE Mobilnet of South Texas Limited PartHouston 03/11/2009 06034.15000
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-289325A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-289325A1.txt
    • Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City CA MD WQJZ353 122-15-46.6 W 0003764421 ALAMEDA, COUNTY OF OAKLAND 03/09/2009 11365.00000 37-48-05.2 N CA MD WQJZ353 122-15-46.6 W 0003764421 ALAMEDA, COUNTY OF OAKLAND 03/09/2009 11565.00000 37-48-05.2 N CA MD WQJZ353 122-15-46.6 W 0003764421 ALAMEDA, COUNTY OF OAKLAND 03/09/2009 11622.50000 37-48-05.2 N AZ MD KOK44 112-04-00.5 W 0003766013 ARIZONA, STATE OF PHOENIX 03/10/2009 06615.62500 33-19-57.1 N FL MD WQIP417 081-56-11.1 W 0003767019 Cape Coral, City of Cape Coral 03/11/2009 00928.00625 26-36-19.0 N FL MD WQIP417 081-56-11.1 W 0003767019 Cape Coral, City of Cape Coral 03/11/2009 00928.60625 26-36-19.0 N FL MD WQIP417 081-56-11.1 W 0003767019 Cape Coral, City of Cape Coral 03/11/2009 00952.00625 26-36-19.0 N FL MD
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-289834A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-289834A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-289834A1.txt
    • their Equal Employment Opportunity programs conducted pursuant to §76.77 of this chapter. §0.455 Other locations at which records may be inspected. Except as provided in §0.453, §0.457, and §0.459, records are routinely available for inspection in the Reference Information Center or the offices of the Bureau or Office which exercises responsibility over the matters to which those records pertain (see §0.5), or will be made available for inspection at those offices upon request. Upon inquiry to the appropriate Bureau or Office, persons desiring to inspect such records will be directed to the specific location at which the particular records may be inspected. Examples of the records available from Bureaus and Offices are set forth in paragraphs (a) through (c). (a) Media
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-289859A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-289859A1.txt
    • MD WNEI272 118-58-45.4 W 0003791118 Pacific Gas and Electric Company Shaver Lake 03/30/2009 06680.00000 37-00-39.8 N CA MD WAV739 118-58-26.4 W 0003791119 Pacific Gas and Electric Company Shaver Lake 03/30/2009 06805.00000 37-04-37.8 N Page 33 MG - Microwave Industrial/Business Pool State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City CA MD KMJ72 119-46-00.5 W 0003791120 Pacific Gas and Electric Company FRESNO 03/30/2009 06765.00000 36-43-09.8 N CA MD WNEX247 119-00-36.4 W 0003791121 Pacific Gas and Electric Company Shaver Lake 03/30/2009 00957.20000 37-01-47.8 N AK MD WGX772 148-51-41.0 W 0003791903 BP Exploration (Alaska) Inc. PRUDHOE BAY 03/31/2009 11455.00000 70-18-44.0 N TX MD WQJE538 096-48-14.0 W 0003792329 Edu-Net, LLC Dallas 03/31/2009 11365.00000 32-46-48.0 N TX MD
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-290060A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-290060A1.txt
    • License, LLC 04/08/2009 RO WPOL852 0003801530 Omnipoint NY MTA License, LLC 04/08/2009 RO WPOL888 0003801531 Omnipoint NY MTA License, LLC 04/08/2009 RO WPOL889 0003801532 Omnipoint NY MTA License, LLC 04/08/2009 CL - Cellular State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City NM MD WQJE415 104-54-48.3 W 0003797648 Excomm, LLC Cimarron 04/06/2009 36-31-00.5 N NM MD WQJE415 105-02-56.0 W 0003797648 Excomm, LLC Ocate 04/06/2009 36-10-30.0 N NM MD WQJE415 104-56-42.1 W 0003797648 Excomm, LLC Philmont 04/06/2009 36-27-51.5 N MT MD KNKN430 108-53-42.7 W 0003797898 WWC HOLDING CO., INC. Broadview 04/06/2009 46-04-08.8 N MO MD KNKN466 093-07-59.5 W 0003803769 USCOC OF GREATER MISSOURI, LLCMENDON 04/10/2009 39-33-15.2 N AZ NE 112-43-10.9 W 0003797858 Tisdale Telephone
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-290425A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-290425A1.txt
    • th 445 12St., S.W. Below is a listing of applications, subject to the pre-grant notice and petition procedure of Section 309 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, that were accepted for filing. MW - Microwave Public Safety Pool State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City AZ AM KOK44 112-04-00.5 W 0003766013 ARIZONA, STATE OF PHOENIX 04/23/2009 06655.62500 33-19-57.1 N AZ AM KOK44 112-04-00.5 W 0003766013 ARIZONA, STATE OF PHOENIX 04/20/2009 06655.62500 33-19-57.1 N NJ AM WQEY871 074-49-29.3 W 0003815829 County of Cape May - MIS Department Cape May 04/23/2009 11015.00000 39-05-00.1 N NJ AM WQEY871 074-49-29.3 W 0003815829 County of Cape May - MIS Department Cape May 04/23/2009 11095.00000
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-290575A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-290575A1.txt
    • W 0003824918 AT&T CORP. WESTBURY 05/01/2009 11235.00000 40-44-08.4 N NY NE 073-34-58.7 W 0003824918 AT&T CORP. WESTBURY 05/01/2009 11285.00000 40-44-08.4 N NY NE 073-43-37.4 W 0003824919 AT&T CORP. BELLEROSE 05/01/2009 10745.00000 40-45-00.3 N NY NE 073-31-11.2 W 0003824920 AT&T CORP. WANTAGH 05/01/2009 10795.00000 40-40-17.1 N NY NE 073-40-30.0 W 0003825267 T-MOBILE LICENSE LLC PEASLEEVILLE 05/01/2009 10636.25000 44-34-24.0 N NY NE 073-26-00.5 W 0003825271 T-MOBILE LICENSE LLC WILLSBORO 05/01/2009 10571.25000 44-24-12.2 N NY NE 073-40-15.8 W 0003825658 AT&T CORP. ROSLYN 05/01/2009 19490.00000 40-45-52.2 N MD NE 076-33-30.5 W 0003825659 AT&T CORP. BALTIMORE 05/01/2009 10905.00000 39-21-18.0 N DC NE 077-02-28.8 W 0003825661 AT&T CORP. WASHINGTON 05/01/2009 22080.00000 38-53-59.9 N DC NE 076-59-40.6 W 0003825662 AT&T CORP. WASHINGTON 05/01/2009 21880.00000 38-51-02.2 N MD NE
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-290669A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-290669A1.txt
    • 46-19-54.0 N GA NE 085-11-42.8 W 0003830983 CATOOSA COUNTY LAFAYETTE 05/07/2009 05974.85000 34-41-12.9 N GA NE 085-11-42.8 W 0003830983 CATOOSA COUNTY LAFAYETTE 05/07/2009 06152.75000 34-41-12.9 N GA NE 085-07-39.2 W 0003830984 CATOOSA COUNTY RINGGOLD 05/07/2009 05974.85000 34-51-03.9 N GA NE 085-07-39.2 W 0003830984 CATOOSA COUNTY RINGGOLD 05/07/2009 06404.79000 34-51-03.9 N GA NE 085-01-07.0 W 0003830985 CATOOSA COUNTY DALTON 05/07/2009 06226.89000 34-44-00.5 N GA NE 085-01-07.0 W 0003830985 CATOOSA COUNTY DALTON 05/07/2009 06345.49000 34-44-00.5 N TN NE 085-04-26.0 W 0003830986 CATOOSA COUNTY COLLEGEDALE 05/07/2009 06093.45000 35-01-32.0 N TN NE 085-20-42.6 W 0003830987 CATOOSA COUNTY LOOKOUT MOUNTA 05/07/2009 06226.89000 35-00-11.9 N WA RM WNEO652 122-54-40.5 W 0003826321 WASHINGTON, STATE OF; Dept. of TranTUMWATER 05/04/2009 00958.35000 47-00-44.3 N WA RM WNEO652 122-54-40.5 W 0003826321
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-290674A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-290674A1.txt
    • 259 WICHITA 05/07/2009 17960.00000 37-41-33.7 N TX MD WHC798 095-49-03.8 W 0003831646 BNSF Railway Co. ROSENBERG 05/08/2009 06675.00000 29-33-39.8 N TX MD WHC798 095-49-03.8 W 0003831646 BNSF Railway Co. ROSENBERG 05/08/2009 06695.00000 29-33-39.8 N TX MD WHC797 095-27-58.7 W 0003831659 BNSF Railway Co. FRESNO 05/08/2009 06855.00000 29-32-54.8 N KY NE P 084-49-00.0 W 0003826253 HUSTONVILLE WATER WORKS HUSTONVILLE 05/04/2009 00956.35625 37-28-00.5 N WI NE 088-19-04.4 W 0003826376 WFRV & WJMN TELEVISION STATION IGreen Bay 05/04/2009 11285.00000 44-17-48.8 N WI NE 087-58-55.7 W 0003826378 WFRV & WJMN TELEVISION STATION IDe Pere, WI 05/04/2009 10795.00000 44-20-00.1 N WI NE 087-58-55.7 W 0003826378 WFRV & WJMN TELEVISION STATION IDe Pere, WI 05/04/2009 10875.00000 44-20-00.1 N Page 39 MG - Microwave Industrial/Business Pool State Purpose
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-290860A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-290860A1.txt
    • W 0003834043 AT&T CORP. BROOKLYN 05/11/2009 11425.00000 40-34-49.9 N NY NE 074-00-01.2 W 0003834044 AT&T CORP. BROOKLYN 05/11/2009 11315.00000 40-35-50.9 N Page 14 CF - Common Carrier Fixed Point to Point Microwave State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City OR NE 118-36-20.0 W 0003834148 Pocketinet Communications, Inc. Pendleton 05/11/2009 06345.49000 45-36-00.5 N WA NE 120-31-56.0 W 0003834162 Pocketinet Communications, Inc. Yakima 05/11/2009 19620.00000 46-36-34.0 N WA NE 120-30-41.2 W 0003834179 Pocketinet Communications, Inc. Yakima 05/11/2009 18060.00000 46-31-56.4 N NJ NE 075-03-02.8 W 0003834613 TELECOM TRANSPORT MANAGEMENTHADDON HEIGHTS 05/12/2009 23030.00000 39-52-33.9 N TX NE 098-53-42.9 W 0003835000 San Antonio MTA, L.P. Devine 05/12/2009 06123.10000 29-09-14.2 N TX NE 098-53-42.9 W 0003835000 San
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-290862A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-290862A1.txt
    • 05/12/2009 00815.96250 NE MD WQKD475 099-07-52.3 W 0003835840 Nextel License Holdings 4, Inc. KEARNEY 05/12/2009 00860.96250 40-42-38.0 N NE MD WQKD475 099-05-33.3 W 0003835840 Nextel License Holdings 4, Inc. PLEASANTON 05/12/2009 00860.96250 40-53-37.0 N MD WQIJ801 A 0003837091 NEXTEL WIP LICENSE CORP. 05/13/2009 00806.00000 - 00821.00000 LA MD WQIJ801 092-08-54.5 W 0003837091 NEXTEL WIP LICENSE CORP. WEST MONROE 05/13/2009 00851.01250 32-31-00.5 N LA MD WQIJ801 092-08-54.5 W 0003837091 NEXTEL WIP LICENSE CORP. WEST MONROE 05/13/2009 00852.01250 32-31-00.5 N RO WNPJ209 0003837152 NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS OF THE M 05/13/2009 RO WNPJ210 0003837153 NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS OF THE M 05/13/2009 RO KNDN357 0003837158 Nextel Communications of the Mid-Atlantic 05/13/2009 RO KNDN385 0003837159 Nextel Communications of the Mid-Atlantic 05/13/2009 RO WPNW609 0003837160 Nextel Communications of the
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-290864A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-290864A1.txt
    • District Tucson 05/11/2009 19540.00000 32-15-56.8 N WY NE 105-52-52.0 W 0003833955 CAMPBELL COUNTY SHERIFFS DEPARGILLETTE 05/11/2009 06630.62500 43-43-26.6 N WY NE 105-52-52.0 W 0003833955 CAMPBELL COUNTY SHERIFFS DEPARGILLETTE 05/11/2009 06655.62500 43-43-26.6 N WY NE 105-28-07.8 W 0003833959 CAMPBELL COUNTY SHERIFFS DEPARGILLETTE 05/11/2009 06790.62500 44-12-33.8 N WY NE 105-28-07.8 W 0003833959 CAMPBELL COUNTY SHERIFFS DEPARGILLETTE 05/11/2009 06835.62500 44-12-33.8 N WY NE 105-28-00.5 W 0003833962 CAMPBELL COUNTY SHERIFFS DEPARWRIGHT 05/11/2009 06815.62500 43-44-40.5 N CA NE 119-13-09.2 W 0003834953 Ventura County Office of Education Ventura 05/12/2009 10875.00000 34-15-22.0 N NY NE 075-22-35.6 W 0003836280 Oneida, County of ORISKANY 05/12/2009 00956.80000 43-09-21.6 N NY NE 075-14-58.7 W 0003836281 Oneida, County of REMSEN 05/12/2009 00953.20000 43-20-41.7 N IN NE 085-21-55.6 W 0003836617 LAKELAND SCHOOL DISTRICT Wolcottville
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-290959A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-290959A1.txt
    • COMPANYCAMPUS 05/19/2009 06345.94000 41-00-29.0 N IL MD WSI45 088-36-13.2 W 0003844478 COMMONWEALTH EDISON COMPANYPontiac 05/19/2009 06375.14000 40-50-30.4 N IL MD WSI45 088-36-13.2 W 0003844478 COMMONWEALTH EDISON COMPANYPontiac 05/19/2009 06404.79000 40-50-30.4 N IL MD WSI45 088-36-13.2 W 0003844478 COMMONWEALTH EDISON COMPANYPontiac 05/19/2009 06655.00000 40-50-30.4 N IL MD WSI45 088-36-13.2 W 0003844478 COMMONWEALTH EDISON COMPANYPontiac 05/19/2009 06855.00000 40-50-30.4 N TX MD WQJS606 095-31-00.5 W 0003844796 Franklin Group Inc. HOUSTON 05/19/2009 10975.00000 29-42-06.8 N NM MD WNTP349 107-45-24.0 W 0003844815 Amoco Production Company AZTEC 05/19/2009 00928.63125 36-48-01.0 N NM MD WNTP349 107-45-24.0 W 0003844815 Amoco Production Company AZTEC 05/19/2009 00952.63125 36-48-01.0 N TX MD WQJZ815 095-28-55.7 W 0003844970 Franklin Group Inc. HOUSTON 05/19/2009 11465.00000 29-44-56.8 N TX MD WQJZ815 095-28-55.7 W 0003844970 Franklin Group
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-290960A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-290960A1.txt
    • 42-50-46.3 N WI MD WQBC365 089-02-56.0 W 0003848207 UNITED STATES CELLULAR OPERATINEdgerton 05/22/2009 10587.50000 42-50-46.3 N TX MD WQIU833 099-27-27.0 W 0003848214 Conterra Ultra Broadband, LLC CLYDE 05/22/2009 17920.00000 32-24-24.0 N TX MD WQIU834 099-31-27.4 W 0003848223 Conterra Ultra Broadband, LLC Clyde 05/22/2009 19480.00000 32-24-56.4 N IL MD WPOP929 088-54-31.3 W 0003848272 Southern Illinois RSA Partnership d/b/a AlINA 05/22/2009 06845.00000 38-10-00.5 N IL MD WMK706 089-00-49.0 W 0003848274 Southern Illinois RSA Partnership d/b/a AlSESSOR 05/22/2009 06197.24000 38-02-14.0 N IL MD WMK706 089-00-49.0 W 0003848274 Southern Illinois RSA Partnership d/b/a AlSESSOR 05/22/2009 06226.89000 38-02-14.0 N IL MD WMK706 089-00-49.0 W 0003848274 Southern Illinois RSA Partnership d/b/a AlSESSOR 05/22/2009 06256.54000 38-02-14.0 N IL MD WMK706 089-00-49.0 W 0003848274 Southern Illinois RSA Partnership d/b/a
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-291315A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-291315A1.txt
    • 122-11-40.5 W 0003857865 Clearwire Spectrum Holdings II, LLC EVERETT 06/03/2009 19675.00000 47-59-52.8 N WA MD WQFY384 122-19-41.8 W 0003857867 Clearwire Spectrum Holdings II, LLC DES MOINES 06/03/2009 17920.00000 47-24-56.8 N WA MD WQFY384 122-19-41.8 W 0003857867 Clearwire Spectrum Holdings II, LLC DES MOINES 06/03/2009 17965.00000 47-24-56.8 N WA MD WQFM358 122-09-13.5 W 0003857868 Clearwire Spectrum Holdings, LLC REDMOND 06/03/2009 21875.00000 47-42-00.5 N WA MD WQFM358 122-09-13.5 W 0003857868 Clearwire Spectrum Holdings, LLC REDMOND 06/03/2009 22125.00000 47-42-00.5 N WA MD WQFM358 122-09-13.5 W 0003857868 Clearwire Spectrum Holdings, LLC REDMOND 06/03/2009 22225.00000 47-42-00.5 N WA MD WQFM358 122-09-13.5 W 0003857868 Clearwire Spectrum Holdings, LLC REDMOND 06/03/2009 22275.00000 47-42-00.5 N WA MD WQFM358 122-09-13.5 W 0003857868 Clearwire Spectrum Holdings, LLC REDMOND 06/03/2009 22375.00000 47-42-00.5
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-291391A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-291391A2.txt
    • 0.0 0.0100.0 2,445,845,781 0.0 16.7 0.9 30.2 52.3 Gibraltar $246,365 0.0 6.3 0.0 27.0 66.7 $4,802 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0100.0 $5,726 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0100.0 4,826,028 0.0 2.2 0.0 23.9 74.0 Greece $21,416,006 0.0 17.0 2.0 25.4 55.7 $1,370,124 0.0 20.5 0.0 41.3 38.2 $2,979,742 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0100.0 273,428,849 0.0 10.8 5.5 43.2 40.5 Greenland $218,157 0.0 11.5 0.0 0.5 87.9 $567 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0100.0 $145 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0100.0 495,096 0.0 9.2 0.0 0.6 90.1 Iceland $1,967,657 0.0 7.2 0.2 33.3 59.3 $124,077 0.0 40.9 0.0 35.1 24.0 $1,755 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0100.0 19,962,562 0.0 14.8 0.0 43.2 42.0 Ireland $32,519,820 0.0 30.1 0.6 17.3 52.0 $4,074,912 0.0 34.8 0.0 24.7 40.5 $3,931,159 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0100.0 486,605,258
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-291433A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-291433A1.txt
    • 0003865528 BATH, TOWNSHIP OF FAIRLAWN 06/10/2009 10558.12500 41-08-02.4 N OH MD WQHX235 081-33-08.0 W 0003865529 BATH, TOWNSHIP OF Akron 06/10/2009 10623.12500 41-04-15.0 N Page 3 MW - Microwave Public Safety Pool State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City VA MD WQDV924 076-17-56.8 W 0003865805 HAMPTON ROADS PLANNING DISTRICPORTSMOUTH 06/11/2009 11015.00000 36-50-00.5 N MA MD KCA71 071-53-11.6 W 0003865806 MASSACHUSETTS, COMMONWEALTH PRINCETON 06/11/2009 00953.70000 42-29-17.4 N MA MD KCA71 071-53-11.6 W 0003865806 MASSACHUSETTS, COMMONWEALTH PRINCETON 06/11/2009 06375.14000 42-29-17.4 N MA MD KCA71 071-53-11.6 W 0003865806 MASSACHUSETTS, COMMONWEALTH PRINCETON 06/11/2009 06404.79000 42-29-17.4 N MA MD KCA71 071-53-11.6 W 0003865806 MASSACHUSETTS, COMMONWEALTH PRINCETON 06/11/2009 06745.00000 42-29-17.4 N MA MD KCA71 071-53-11.6 W 0003865806 MASSACHUSETTS,
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-291567A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-291567A1.txt
    • 06/19/2009 06123.10000 26-54-16.0 N FL MD WPWZ620 080-16-25.4 W 0003875695 Verizon Wireless Personal CommunicatioJupiter 06/19/2009 06152.75000 26-54-16.0 N Page 8 CF - Common Carrier Fixed Point to Point Microwave State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City PA MD WQFW837 078-50-26.0 W 0003875735 LAST MILE INC. dba STING COMMUNICWINBUR 06/19/2009 06256.54000 40-17-00.5 N PA MD WQFW837 078-50-26.0 W 0003875735 LAST MILE INC. dba STING COMMUNICWINBUR 06/19/2009 06345.49000 40-17-00.5 N PA MD WQFW837 078-50-26.0 W 0003875735 LAST MILE INC. dba STING COMMUNICWINBUR 06/19/2009 11325.00000 40-17-00.5 N PA MD WQFW837 078-50-26.0 W 0003875735 LAST MILE INC. dba STING COMMUNICWINBUR 06/19/2009 11485.00000 40-17-00.5 N FL MD WPNH357 080-24-49.4 W 0003875746 Verizon Wireless Personal CommunicatioPORT SAINT
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-291810A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-291810A1.txt
    • NEWPORT TELEVISION LICENSE LLCEUGENE 06/24/2009 02450.00000 - 02467.00000 44-05-19.4 N OR MD KA88550 P 123-02-34.3 W 0003879894 NEWPORT TELEVISION LICENSE LLCEUGENE 06/24/2009 02467.00000 - 02483.50000 44-05-19.4 N GA MD KC25976 P 084-20-02.0 W 0003881397 WAGA LICENSE, INC. ATLANTA 06/24/2009 02467.00000 - 02483.50000 33-47-51.0 N AZ MD KA88828 P 112-03-54.5 W 0003882249 ARIZONA BOARD OF REGENTS PHOENIX 06/24/2009 01990.00000 - 02008.00000 33-20-00.5 N Page 50 TP - TV Pickup State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City AZ MD KA88828 P 112-03-54.5 W 0003882249 ARIZONA BOARD OF REGENTS PHOENIX 06/24/2009 02008.00000 - 02110.00000 33-20-00.5 N AZ MD KA88828 P 112-03-54.5 W 0003882249 ARIZONA BOARD OF REGENTS PHOENIX 06/24/2009 02025.00000 - 02025.50000 33-20-00.5 N
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-291811A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-291811A1.txt
    • W 0003884484 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIAmarillo 06/26/2009 17915.00000 35-09-39.6 N TX NE 101-55-07.6 W 0003884484 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIAmarillo 06/26/2009 21975.00000 35-09-39.6 N TX NE 102-04-31.0 W 0003884489 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIMIDLAND 06/26/2009 19575.00000 32-02-04.0 N TX NE 102-04-31.0 W 0003884489 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIMIDLAND 06/26/2009 19675.00000 32-02-04.0 N TX NE 101-37-01.5 W 0003884491 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIAmarillo 06/26/2009 11225.00000 35-13-00.5 N TX NE 101-37-01.5 W 0003884491 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIAmarillo 06/26/2009 11265.00000 35-13-00.5 N TX NE 097-38-41.1 W 0003884496 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIRobstown 06/26/2009 19475.00000 27-48-48.4 N TX NE 097-38-41.1 W 0003884496 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIRobstown 06/26/2009 19525.00000 27-48-48.4 N TX NE 097-32-46.5 W 0003884588 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIICorpus Christi 06/26/2009 11505.00000 27-50-26.9 N TX NE 097-32-46.5 W 0003884588 CLEARWIRE
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-291914A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-291914A1.txt
    • NE 109-23-37.0 W 0003887407 Smith Bagley Inc DBA Cellular One of NE Klageton 06/29/2009 10715.00000 35-34-02.5 N PR NE 066-36-19.4 W 0003887807 CCPR SERVICES, INC PONCE 06/30/2009 11147.50000 18-00-26.8 N PR NE 066-34-56.1 W 0003887830 CCPR SERVICES, INC PONCE 06/30/2009 11637.50000 18-00-38.3 N NH NE 071-42-03.4 W 0003887888 NH #1 RURAL CELLULAR, INC. BRISTOL 06/30/2009 06775.00000 43-38-34.6 N OR NE 121-43-00.5 W 0003887989 Edge Wireless, LLC Klamath Falls 06/30/2009 06412.20000 43-18-21.1 N OR NE 121-25-46.3 W 0003887993 New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC La Pine 06/30/2009 06160.16000 43-39-00.7 N IA NE 092-05-35.6 W 0003888339 FARMERS CELLULAR TELEPHONE CODOUDS 06/30/2009 06585.00000 40-48-01.6 N WA NE 119-10-03.0 W 0003888782 Verizon Wireless (VAW) LLC KENNEWICK 07/01/2009 10637.50000 46-12-54.0 N WA NE 119-11-45.0 W 0003888800 Verizon
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-291915A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-291915A1.txt
    • HOLDINGS II LAS VEGAS 07/01/2009 22125.00000 36-06-54.3 N NV MD WQJD857 115-09-57.3 W 0003889084 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS II LAS VEGAS 07/01/2009 22225.00000 36-06-54.3 N Page 17 MG - Microwave Industrial/Business Pool State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City OR MD WQKK486 122-40-48.3 W 0003889500 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIPortland 07/01/2009 22775.00000 45-31-00.5 N OR MD WQIM684 122-40-50.8 W 0003889503 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS II PORTLAND 07/01/2009 11225.00000 45-31-17.3 N OR MD WQIM684 122-40-50.8 W 0003889503 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS II PORTLAND 07/01/2009 11305.00000 45-31-17.3 N OR MD WQIM684 122-40-50.8 W 0003889503 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS II PORTLAND 07/01/2009 19525.00000 45-31-17.3 N OR MD WQIM684 122-40-50.8 W 0003889503 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS II PORTLAND 07/01/2009 19625.00000 45-31-17.3
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-292137A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-292137A1.txt
    • 11405.00000 47-42-57.9 N DC NE 077-02-31.6 W 0003901785 MPX Inc Washington 07/15/2009 22035.00000 38-54-07.5 N VA NE 077-04-07.1 W 0003901891 MPX Inc Arlington 07/15/2009 23235.00000 38-53-37.8 N MD NE P 076-30-13.9 W 0003902381 ANNE ARUNDEL, COUNTY OF GLEN BURNIE 07/16/2009 00956.36875 39-11-15.4 N SC NE P 081-46-20.5 W 0003902870 COMMISSION OF PUBLIC WORKS SALUDA 07/16/2009 00956.28125 34-00-05.7 N CO NE 104-49-00.5 W 0003904346 OPEN RANGE COMMUNICATIONS FT LUPTON 07/17/2009 11035.00000 40-05-31.9 N CO NE 105-07-27.5 W 0003904349 OPEN RANGE COMMUNICATIONS FT COLLINS 07/17/2009 21925.00000 40-37-39.5 N RO WNTP326 0003902078 Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line Company, L 07/16/2009 RO WNTP468 0003902079 Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line Company, L 07/16/2009 RO WIA472 0003902132 Louisiana Generating, LLC 07/16/2009 RO WNEF575 0003902148 Louisiana Generating, LLC 07/16/2009 RO
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-292194A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-292194A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-292194A1.txt
    • modem service represented 46.7% of these lines while 34.1% were asymmetric DSL (ADSL) connections, 0.1% were symmetric DSL (SDSL) or traditional wireline connections, 2.7% were fiber connections to the end user premises, and 16.4% used other types of technology including satellite, terrestrial fixed or mobile wireless (on a licensed or unlicensed basis), and electric power line. High-speed ADSL increased by 0.5 million lines during the first half of 2008, fiber connections increased by 0.5 million lines, and cable modem service increased by 1.7 million lines. For the full twelve-month period ending June 30, 2008, ADSL increased by 2.2 million lines, fiber connections increased by 1.1 million lines, and cable modem service increased by 3.8 million lines. Advanced Services Lines Advanced services
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-292319A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-292319A1.txt
    • 1 06/23/2009 WPFH879 MO UPPER LAKES FOODS 464.87500000 -- -- 5 1 06/23/2009 WPFH879 MO UPPER LAKES FOODS 464.87500000 -- -- 5 1 06/23/2009 WPFH879 MO UPPER LAKES FOODS 469.87500000 -- -- 5 1 06/23/2009 WPFH879 MO UPPER LAKES FOODS 469.87500000 -- -- 5 1 06/12/2009 WPFT708 FB2 Mississipppi Band of Choctaw Indians d/b/a Chocta 461.95000000 Philadelphia 32-46-11.4 N MS 89-12-0.5 W 2 1 06/12/2009 WPFT708 FB2 Mississipppi Band of Choctaw Indians d/b/a Chocta 463.57500000 Philadelphia 32-46-11.4 N MS 89-12-0.5 W 2 1 06/12/2009 WPFT708 MO Mississipppi Band of Choctaw Indians d/b/a Chocta 461.95000000 Philadelphia 32-46-11.4 N MS 89-12-0.5 W 3 1 06/12/2009 WPFT708 MO Mississipppi Band of Choctaw Indians d/b/a Chocta 463.57500000 Philadelphia 32-46-11.4 N MS 89-12-0.5 W 3 1
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-292352A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-292352A1.txt
    • 29-30-50.7 N TX NE 098-26-16.3 W 0003905054 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIITerrell Hills 07/17/2009 22075.00000 29-28-16.2 N TX NE 098-24-00.8 W 0003905055 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIISan Antonio 07/17/2009 23025.00000 29-22-36.3 N TX NE 098-25-44.6 W 0003905057 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIISAN ANTONIO 07/17/2009 23025.00000 29-20-55.4 N TX NE 098-32-05.6 W 0003905058 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIISan Antonio 07/17/2009 21825.00000 29-26-47.0 N TX NE 098-28-00.5 W 0003905059 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIISan Antonio 07/17/2009 21825.00000 29-33-09.7 N TX NE 098-27-02.9 W 0003905063 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIISan Antonio 07/17/2009 23025.00000 29-35-03.1 N TX NE 098-27-21.5 W 0003905064 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIISan Antonio 07/17/2009 23025.00000 29-23-02.1 N TX NE 098-33-04.0 W 0003905066 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIISAN ANTONIO 07/17/2009 21875.00000 29-30-40.0 N TX NE 098-33-04.0 W 0003905066 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-292353A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-292353A1.txt
    • RO WPOV284 0003908639 LOS ANGELES SMSA LIMITED PARTNE 07/22/2009 CL - Cellular State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City WY AM KNKN276 105-59-50.2 W 0003887342 WWC HOLDING CO., INC. Arvada 07/21/2009 44-40-19.1 N WY AM KNKN276 106-16-12.9 W 0003887342 WWC HOLDING CO., INC. Buffalo 07/21/2009 44-11-50.8 N WY AM KNKN276 106-42-00.5 W 0003887342 WWC HOLDING CO., INC. Buffalo 07/21/2009 44-13-57.5 N WY AM KNKN276 107-13-51.3 W 0003887342 WWC HOLDING CO., INC. Dayton 07/21/2009 44-55-15.9 N WY AM KNKN276 106-15-05.4 W 0003887342 WWC HOLDING CO., INC. Edgerton 07/21/2009 43-24-53.0 N Page 11 CL - Cellular State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-292354A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-292354A1.txt
    • IIITinley Park 07/23/2009 11425.00000 41-33-29.9 N IL NE 088-02-47.0 W 0003910357 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIJoliet 07/23/2009 17965.00000 41-30-44.8 N IL NE 088-02-47.0 W 0003910357 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIJoliet 07/23/2009 18065.00000 41-30-44.8 N IL NE 087-35-52.2 W 0003910358 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIChicago 07/23/2009 17815.00000 41-43-58.6 N IL NE 087-35-52.2 W 0003910358 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIChicago 07/23/2009 17915.00000 41-43-58.6 N IL NE 087-45-00.5 W 0003910359 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIChicago 07/23/2009 17815.00000 41-59-37.1 N IL NE 087-45-00.5 W 0003910359 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIChicago 07/23/2009 17915.00000 41-59-37.1 N IL NE 088-20-24.0 W 0003910405 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIINorth Aurora 07/23/2009 19375.00000 41-48-07.9 N IL NE 088-20-24.0 W 0003910405 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIINorth Aurora 07/23/2009 19475.00000 41-48-07.9 N GM NE 090-56-48.3 W 0003912628 AirTap Communications, LLC 07/24/2009
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-292739A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-292739A1.txt
    • 08/04/2009 19360.00000 39-29-04.3 N NV NE 119-18-02.9 W 0003921500 LYON COUNTY, NEVADA Silver Springs 08/04/2009 19400.00000 39-29-04.3 N NV NE 119-13-34.0 W 0003921507 LYON COUNTY, NEVADA YERINGTON 08/04/2009 17840.00000 39-24-20.1 N AZ NE 110-19-54.8 W 0003922193 NAVAJO TRIBAL UTILITY AUTHORITYPINON 08/05/2009 05974.85000 36-04-32.8 N AZ NE 110-11-24.6 W 0003922291 NAVAJO TRIBAL UTILITY AUTHORITYIndian Wells 08/05/2009 06034.15000 35-28-16.6 N OH NE 081-46-00.5 W 0003925070 Wayne County Commissioners Orville 08/06/2009 00955.60000 40-50-28.2 N OH NE 081-56-23.0 W 0003925071 Wayne County Commissioners Wooster 08/06/2009 00958.20000 40-50-07.0 N OH NE 081-56-23.2 W 0003925072 Wayne County Commissioners Wooster 08/06/2009 00954.60000 40-49-49.3 N OH NE 081-56-23.2 W 0003925072 Wayne County Commissioners Wooster 08/06/2009 00959.20000 40-49-49.3 N CA NE 121-47-43.0 W 0003926000 Yolo Emergency Communications AgencyWINTERS 08/06/2009 06063.80000
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-292817A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-292817A1.txt
    • BELL, COUNTY OF 453.41250000 -- -- 3 1 07/16/2009 WPMD858 MO3 BELL, COUNTY OF 453.88750000 -- -- 3 1 07/16/2009 WPMD858 MO BELL, COUNTY OF 458.02500000 -- -- 3 1 07/16/2009 WPMD858 MO BELL, COUNTY OF 458.41250000 -- -- 3 1 07/16/2009 WPMD858 MO BELL, COUNTY OF 458.88750000 -- -- 3 1 07/16/2009 WPMD858 FB2 BELL, COUNTY OF 453.02500000 PINEVILLE 36-43-0.5 N KY 83-40-54.5 W 4 1 07/16/2009 WPMD858 FB2 BELL, COUNTY OF 453.41250000 PINEVILLE 36-43-0.5 N KY 83-40-54.5 W 4 1 07/16/2009 WPMD858 FB2 BELL, COUNTY OF 453.02500000 BEVERLY 36-53-59.0 N KY 83-33-46.0 W 5 1 07/16/2009 WPMD858 FB2 BELL, COUNTY OF 453.41250000 BEVERLY 36-53-59.0 N KY 83-33-46.0 W 5 1 07/16/2009 WPMD858 FB2 BELL, COUNTY OF 453.02500000 FRAKES 36-37-6.0
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-292824A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-292824A1.txt
    • Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City AZ MD WMR916 114-03-34.8 W 0003931328 Verizon Wireless (VAW) LLC QUARTZITE 08/12/2009 11325.00000 33-40-03.1 N AZ MD WQFP990 114-13-06.0 W 0003931346 Verizon Wireless (VAW) LLC Quartzsite 08/12/2009 10835.00000 33-39-57.2 N MI MD WQGE310 083-06-47.6 W 0003932227 FIBERTOWER NETWORK SERVICES COHazel Park 08/13/2009 18120.00000 42-28-37.7 N MI MD WQGE302 083-17-00.5 W 0003932228 FIBERTOWER NETWORK SERVICES COSouthfield 08/13/2009 19440.00000 42-29-23.5 N MI MD WQGE319 082-58-13.6 W 0003932229 FIBERTOWER NETWORK SERVICES COWarren 08/13/2009 19320.00000 42-29-35.0 N MI MD WQEF786 083-06-29.0 W 0003932232 FiberTower Network Services Corp. Hazel Park 08/13/2009 19360.00000 42-28-33.0 N MI MD WQEF786 083-06-29.0 W 0003932232 FiberTower Network Services Corp. Hazel Park 08/13/2009 19620.00000 42-28-33.0 N MI MD WQEF786 083-06-29.0
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-293005A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-293005A1.txt
    • 43 MG - Microwave Industrial/Business Pool State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City MD NE 076-38-55.0 W 0003939829 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIBaltimore 08/19/2009 23075.00000 39-21-25.2 N MD NE 076-39-48.9 W 0003939830 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIGambrills 08/19/2009 17865.00000 39-02-11.0 N MD NE 076-35-13.6 W 0003939831 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIBaltimore 08/19/2009 19375.00000 39-22-00.5 N MD NE 076-35-13.6 W 0003939831 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIBaltimore 08/19/2009 19475.00000 39-22-00.5 N MD NE 076-35-13.6 W 0003939831 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIBaltimore 08/19/2009 19575.00000 39-22-00.5 N MD NE 076-35-13.6 W 0003939831 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIBaltimore 08/19/2009 19675.00000 39-22-00.5 N MD NE 076-35-33.5 W 0003939833 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIBrooklyn 08/19/2009 17965.00000 39-13-31.0 N MD NE 076-35-33.5 W 0003939833 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-293006A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-293006A1.txt
    • N TX MD WQKF471 096-58-34.6 W 0003940548 AirCanopy Internet Services MIDLOTHIAN 08/20/2009 19325.00000 32-30-46.4 N TX MD WQKF471 096-58-34.6 W 0003940548 AirCanopy Internet Services MIDLOTHIAN 08/20/2009 19375.00000 32-30-46.4 N TX MD WQKF471 096-58-34.6 W 0003940548 AirCanopy Internet Services MIDLOTHIAN 08/20/2009 19425.00000 32-30-46.4 N TX MD WQKF471 096-58-34.6 W 0003940548 AirCanopy Internet Services MIDLOTHIAN 08/20/2009 23025.00000 32-30-46.4 N TX MD WQKH408 096-51-00.5 W 0003940553 AirCanopy Internet Services Waxahachie 08/20/2009 11265.00000 32-26-23.9 N TX MD WQKH408 096-51-00.5 W 0003940553 AirCanopy Internet Services Waxahachie 08/20/2009 11345.00000 32-26-23.9 N TX MD WQKH408 096-51-00.5 W 0003940553 AirCanopy Internet Services Waxahachie 08/20/2009 19440.00000 32-26-23.9 N TX MD WQKH408 096-51-00.5 W 0003940553 AirCanopy Internet Services Waxahachie 08/20/2009 23025.00000 32-26-23.9 N TX MD WQGK208 096-59-54.0 W 0003940558 AirCanopy Internet
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-293258A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-293258A2.txt
    • Where the acquired CLEC provides services outside of the acquirer's operating region, the numbering resources are treated as CLEC resources. 14 Table 4 Telephone Number Utilization by State as of December 31, 2008 Assigned Intermediate Reserved Aging Administrative Available1 Total State/jurisdiction 000s % 000s % 000s % 000s % 000s % 000s % 000s Alabama 9,637 43.8 701 3.2 107 0.5 617 2.8 346 1.6 10,578 48.1 21,986 Alaska 1,541 26.2 41 0.7 131 2.2 84 1.4 26 0.4 4,053 69.0 5,876 American Samoa 24 80.8 0 0.0 1 4.8 0 0.2 1 2.5 4 11.7 30 Arizona 13,589 63.9 89 0.4 165 0.8 697 3.3 215 1.0 6,511 30.6 21,266 Arkansas 5,070 35.6 461 3.2 68 0.5 274 1.9 166
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-293261A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-293261A2.txt
    • 2.7 2.3 2.8 3.4 3.6 3.8 4.4 5.3 6.4 7.8 9.3 (CLECs) Local Resellers, Payphone Providers and Other Local Carriers, Excluding LEC Affiliates Total: Fixed Local Service Providers15.1 17.2 18.6 20.4 23.2 26.5 27.2 28.2 29.0 28.1 24.6 25.1 25.7 Wireless Service Providers Wireless Affiliates of RBOCs 16.4 16.9 20.3 21.7 22.6 28.2 Wireless Affiliates of Other 2.1 2.0 0.4 0.5 0.4 0.3 Incumbent LECs Wireless Telephony, Paging, SMR 10.4 11.6 15.3 18.3 18.9 14.6 and Other Wireless Providers, Excluding LEC Affiliates Total Wireless Service Providers 3.3 5.1 6.6 9.4 12.1 17.4 25.3 28.9 30.6 36.0 40.4 41.9 43.1 Toll Service Providers Toll Affiliates of RBOCs 1.7 1.7 2.0 2.3 3.0 3.5 5.1 7.2 8.6 29.1 27.4 25.5 23.4 Toll Affiliates
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-293346A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-293346A1.txt
    • IA JECC CORALVILLE 09/04/2009 10955.00000 41-42-37.0 N IA NE 091-27-44.1 W 0003956832 JOHNSON COUNTY, IA JECC Solon 09/04/2009 05945.20000 41-46-51.6 N IA NE 091-27-44.1 W 0003956832 JOHNSON COUNTY, IA JECC Solon 09/04/2009 05974.85000 41-46-51.6 N IA NE 091-27-44.1 W 0003956832 JOHNSON COUNTY, IA JECC Solon 09/04/2009 06685.00000 41-46-51.6 N FL NE 081-32-45.0 W 0003957356 Apopka City of Apopka 09/04/2009 06695.00000 28-29-00.5 N NY NE 073-51-00.4 W 0003957374 SARATOGA COUNTY OFFICE OF EMERBALLSTON SPA 09/04/2009 06845.00000 42-59-58.3 N NY NE 073-44-52.8 W 0003957381 SARATOGA COUNTY OFFICE OF EMERWilton 09/04/2009 06605.00000 43-12-13.4 N Page 11 MW - Microwave Public Safety Pool State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City NY NE 073-44-52.8 W 0003957381
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-293347A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-293347A1.txt
    • BROADCASTING COMPANYNorthport 09/03/2009 02025.50000 - 02109.50000 45-15-05.0 N MI MD KC23756 P 084-20-00.0 W 0003956214 HERITAGE BROADCASTING COMPANYMio 09/03/2009 02025.50000 - 02109.50000 44-28-32.4 N MI MD KC26258 P 085-21-52.0 W 0003956230 HERITAGE BROADCASTING COMPANYEvart 09/03/2009 02008.00000 - 02093.00000 43-54-31.0 N MI MD KC26258 P 085-21-52.0 W 0003956230 HERITAGE BROADCASTING COMPANYEvart 09/03/2009 02025.50000 - 02109.50000 43-54-31.0 N SC MD KC26152 P 081-50-00.5 W 0003956453 WAGT TELEVISION, INC. Jackson 09/03/2009 02025.50000 - 02109.50000 33-24-20.7 N LA MD KB96694 P 092-04-14.4 W 0003957502 HOAK MEDIA OF LOUISIANA LICENSE, Columbia 09/04/2009 01990.00000 - 02110.00000 32-11-50.5 N LA MD KB96694 P 092-04-14.4 W 0003957502 HOAK MEDIA OF LOUISIANA LICENSE, Columbia 09/04/2009 01990.00000 - 02008.00000 32-11-50.5 N LA MD KB96694 P 092-04-14.4 W 0003957502 HOAK MEDIA OF
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-293594A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-293594A1.txt
    • NE 080-09-09.9 W 0003966346 Aviation Spectrum Resources, Inc Fort Lauderdale 09/16/2009 00131.82500 26-04-21.3 N CA NE 122-13-14.6 W 0003966347 Aviation Spectrum Resources, Inc Oakland 09/16/2009 00129.37500 37-43-16.6 N PA NE 080-17-24.7 W 0003966352 Aviation Spectrum Resources, Inc Washington 09/16/2009 00130.15000 40-08-11.4 N FL NE 080-05-44.1 W 0003966358 Aviation Spectrum Resources, Inc West Palm Beach 09/16/2009 00131.92500 26-40-59.4 N GA NE 084-19-00.5 W 0003966391 Aviation Spectrum Resources, Inc Roswell 09/16/2009 00130.47500 34-03-31.8 N TX NE 095-20-29.2 W 0003966400 Aviation Spectrum Resources, Inc Houston 09/16/2009 00131.42500 29-59-03.9 N WI NE 087-53-47.7 W 0003966404 Aviation Spectrum Resources, Inc Milwaukee 09/16/2009 00130.12500 42-56-50.0 N PA NE 080-10-34.4 W 0003966411 Aviation Spectrum Resources, Inc Erie 09/16/2009 00136.52500 42-04-55.3 N RO WQBR224 0003965481 Port of Friday Harbor
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-293742A1.pdf
    • ebooks ·Basic smartphones accessing news Minimal ·P2P or HD streaming ·2-way HD video teleconferencing Low ·SD video streaming ·Interactive gaming or physical commands Med ·Two-way browsing ·Content streaming and download High ·Voice ·Email ·One-way browsing Example uses Application and device example Similarity to fixed 23 Broadband speed needs vary by application type Example applications Actualdownload speed demands (Mbps)* Content type 0.5-5+ (Speed impacts down/up time and render) · Advanced web browsing, iTunes · Social Networking, P2P, etc · Medical Records download/ sharing · Large download (or upload) usage 0.3-0.5 · Aleks(Online interactive education) · Pogo online games · Basic interaction 1-5 · Streamed classroom lectures · Hulu · SD streamed video 0.1-0.3 (Speed impacts down/up time and render) · Basic email,
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-293751A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-293751A1.txt
    • W 0003969989 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIRALEIGH 09/21/2009 21820.00000 35-52-54.6 N NC NE 078-34-37.1 W 0003969989 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIRALEIGH 09/21/2009 21875.00000 35-52-54.6 N NC NE 078-34-37.1 W 0003969989 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIRALEIGH 09/21/2009 21975.00000 35-52-54.6 N NC NE 078-40-57.1 W 0003969991 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIRALEIGH 09/21/2009 23125.00000 35-47-24.3 N NC NE 079-03-34.2 W 0003969994 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIRALEIGH 09/21/2009 11305.00000 36-03-00.5 N NC NE 079-03-34.2 W 0003969994 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIRALEIGH 09/21/2009 11385.00000 36-03-00.5 N NC NE 079-03-34.2 W 0003969994 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIRALEIGH 09/21/2009 11465.00000 36-03-00.5 N NC NE 079-03-34.2 W 0003969994 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIRALEIGH 09/21/2009 11545.00000 36-03-00.5 N NC NE 078-47-05.0 W 0003969996 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIAPEX 09/21/2009 11505.00000 35-40-45.0 N NC NE 078-47-05.0 W 0003969996 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-293755A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-293755A1.txt
    • and petition procedure of Section 309 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, that were accepted for filing. MW - Microwave Public Safety Pool State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City NV AM 115-12-15.2 W 0003920009 State of Nevada, Department of InformatioLas Vegas 09/21/2009 21885.00000 36-04-11.9 N OH AM 081-46-00.5 W 0003925070 Wayne County Commissioners Orville 09/21/2009 00955.60000 40-50-28.2 N AZ AM KPA62 113-08-08.6 W 0003951396 ARIZONA, STATE OF AQUA CALIENTE 09/25/2009 06695.62500 33-03-06.1 N FL AM 081-32-45.0 W 0003957356 Apopka City of Apopka 09/21/2009 06695.00000 28-39-00.5 N WA AM WNTU495 117-17-50.9 W 0003960334 SPOKANE, COUNTY OF SPOKANE 09/23/2009 02183.20000 47-35-35.7 N WA AM WNTU495 117-17-50.9 W 0003960334 SPOKANE, COUNTY
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-293864A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-293864A1.txt
    • HOLDINGS IIIMundelein 09/29/2009 19375.00000 42-15-08.2 N IL NE 088-01-22.9 W 0003980785 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIMundelein 09/29/2009 19475.00000 42-15-08.2 N IL NE 088-01-22.9 W 0003980785 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIMundelein 09/29/2009 21875.00000 42-15-08.2 N IL NE 088-01-22.9 W 0003980785 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIMundelein 09/29/2009 22025.00000 42-15-08.2 N IL NE 088-00-06.7 W 0003980786 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIMundelein 09/29/2009 17765.00000 42-15-57.0 N IL NE 088-14-00.5 W 0003980788 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIELGIN 09/29/2009 10815.00000 42-01-30.4 N Page 40 MG - Microwave Industrial/Business Pool State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City IL NE 088-14-00.5 W 0003980788 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIELGIN 09/29/2009 10935.00000 42-01-30.4 N IL NE 088-14-00.5 W 0003980788 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIELGIN 09/29/2009 23025.00000 42-01-30.4 N
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-293866A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-293866A1.txt
    • IIICarol Stream 09/29/2009 19475.00000 41-54-02.4 N IL NE 088-05-37.6 W 0003981293 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIICarol Stream 09/29/2009 23325.00000 41-54-02.4 N IL NE 088-05-37.6 W 0003981293 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIICarol Stream 09/29/2009 23475.00000 41-54-02.4 N Page 19 MG - Microwave Industrial/Business Pool State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City IL NE 088-02-00.5 W 0003981294 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIPalatine 09/29/2009 11505.00000 42-09-03.4 N IL NE 088-02-00.5 W 0003981294 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIPalatine 09/29/2009 11585.00000 42-09-03.4 N IL NE 088-02-00.5 W 0003981294 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIPalatine 09/29/2009 18015.00000 42-09-03.4 N IL NE 088-02-00.5 W 0003981294 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIPalatine 09/29/2009 18115.00000 42-09-03.4 N IL NE 088-02-00.5 W 0003981294 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIPalatine 09/29/2009 23075.00000
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-293960A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-293960A1.txt
    • 23025.00000 36-05-14.0 N NC NE 079-53-05.0 W 0003989321 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIGREENSBORO 10/07/2009 23125.00000 36-05-14.0 N NC NE 079-52-02.9 W 0003989325 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIGreensboro 10/07/2009 10775.00000 36-08-45.1 N NC NE 079-52-02.9 W 0003989325 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIGreensboro 10/07/2009 10855.00000 36-08-45.1 N NC NE P 081-28-27.0 W 0003989463 TOWN OF WEST JEFFERSON WARRENSVILLE 10/07/2009 00956.39375 36-27-32.0 N NY NE P 078-02-00.5 W 0003989466 VILLAGE OF BELMONT BELMONT 10/07/2009 00956.30625 42-13-23.2 N NC NE 079-46-25.0 W 0003989562 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIGreensboro 10/07/2009 11265.00000 36-02-44.5 N NC NE 079-46-25.0 W 0003989562 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIGreensboro 10/07/2009 17815.00000 36-02-44.5 N NC NE 079-46-25.0 W 0003989562 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIGreensboro 10/07/2009 17915.00000 36-02-44.5 N NC NE 079-46-25.0 W 0003989562 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIGreensboro 10/07/2009 17965.00000
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-294115A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-294115A1.txt
    • IIIChicago 10/14/2009 23225.00000 41-58-07.8 N Page 16 MG - Microwave Industrial/Business Pool State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City IL MD WQKQ475 087-58-15.6 W 0003997146 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIILIBERTYVILLE 10/14/2009 17815.00000 42-18-19.3 N IL MD WQKQ475 087-58-15.6 W 0003997146 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIILIBERTYVILLE 10/14/2009 17915.00000 42-18-19.3 N IL MD WQKQ576 087-45-00.5 W 0003997154 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIChicago 10/14/2009 17815.00000 41-59-37.1 N IL MD WQKQ576 087-45-00.5 W 0003997154 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIChicago 10/14/2009 17915.00000 41-59-37.1 N IL MD WQKQ576 087-45-00.5 W 0003997154 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIChicago 10/14/2009 23025.00000 41-59-37.1 N IL MD WQKQ576 087-45-00.5 W 0003997154 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIChicago 10/14/2009 23125.00000 41-59-37.1 N IL MD WQKQ576 087-45-00.5 W 0003997154 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-294117A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-294117A1.txt
    • VALLEY BROADCASTING CORPOSPRINGFIELD 10/15/2009 02008.00000 - 02025.00000 39-56-30.2 N OH AM WLE940 083-48-59.7 W 0003902839 MIAMI VALLEY BROADCASTING CORPOSPRINGFIELD 10/15/2009 02037.50000 - 02049.50000 39-56-30.2 N OH AM WLP309 084-13-01.7 W 0003902849 MIAMI VALLEY BROADCASTING CORPOTROY 10/15/2009 02037.50000 - 02049.50000 40-02-18.1 N OH AM WLP309 084-13-01.7 W 0003902849 MIAMI VALLEY BROADCASTING CORPOTROY 10/15/2009 02076.00000 - 02093.00000 40-02-18.1 N NJ MD WDT934 074-46-00.5 W 0003999088 CBS BROADCASTING INC. TRENTON 10/16/2009 02076.00000 - 02093.00000 40-14-05.3 N NJ MD WDT934 074-46-00.5 W 0003999088 CBS BROADCASTING INC. TRENTON 10/16/2009 02097.50000 40-14-05.3 N Page 27
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-294190A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-294190A1.txt
    • notice should conform to Section 25.154 of the Commission's rules, unless otherwise noted. 47 C.F.R. § 25.154. S2763 SAT-LOA-20080910-00173 E Launch and Operating Authority 09/10/2008 10:00:00:92300 Date Filed: SES Americom, Inc. SES Americom, Inc. (SES Americom) requests authority to construct, launch, and operate a 17/24 GHz Broadcasting-Satellite Service (BSS) space station at the 67.5° W.L. orbital location, which is offset 0.5° from the 67° W.L. orbital location specified in Appendix F of the 17/24 GHz BSS Report and Order, FCC 07-76 (rel. May 4, 2007). The proposed operations would be at full power and with full interference protection. (See FCC 07-76 and 07-174 for a complete explanation of the rules and policies regarding the spacing framework and interference protections adopted by
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-294274A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-294274A1.txt
    • WQCX302 MO SOUTH CAROLINA, STATE OF 458.18750000 COLUMBIA 34-6-33.4 N SC 81-5-52.6 W 1 1 09/19/2009 WQCX302 MO SOUTH CAROLINA, STATE OF 458.93750000 COLUMBIA 34-6-33.4 N SC 81-5-52.6 W 1 1 09/24/2009 WXB886 FB2 BENTON COUNTY FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT 155.19000000 BENTON CITY 46-14-50.6 N WA 119-33-49.2 W 1 1 09/24/2009 WXB886 FB BENTON COUNTY FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT 155.19000000 BENTON CITY 46-16-0.5 N WA 119-24-16.1 W 2 1 Page 2 Frequency Termination Pending Call Sign Termination Date Stn Class Licensee Name Lower/Upper Frequency City Latitude State Longitude Loc./ Path ## Ant. PW - Public Safety Pool, Conventional Public Safety and Homeland Security Bureau 09/24/2009 WXB886 MO BENTON COUNTY FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT 155.19000000 -- WA -- 3 1 Page 3
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-294276A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-294276A1.txt
    • 03650.00000 - 03700.00000 TI - TV Intercity Relay State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City OH AM WLP309 084-13-01.7 W 0003902849 MIAMI VALLEY BROADCASTING CORPOTROY 10/19/2009 02037.50000 - 02049.50000 40-02-18.1 N OH AM WLP309 084-13-01.7 W 0003902849 MIAMI VALLEY BROADCASTING CORPOTROY 10/19/2009 02076.00000 - 02093.00000 40-02-18.1 N NJ AM WDT934 074-46-00.5 W 0003999088 CBS BROADCASTING INC. TRENTON 10/21/2009 02076.00000 - 02093.00000 40-14-05.3 N NJ AM WDT934 074-46-00.5 W 0003999088 CBS BROADCASTING INC. TRENTON 10/21/2009 02097.50000 40-14-05.3 N WA MD WPWM290 122-28-01.0 W 0004000084 TRIBUNE TELEVISION NORTHWEST, INTACOMA 10/19/2009 06912.50000 47-14-31.0 N WA MD WPWM289 122-18-30.4 W 0004000095 TRIBUNE TELEVISION NORTHWEST, INSeattle 10/19/2009 07012.50000 47-36-56.3 N WA MD WPQP687 122-48-27.0 W 0004000103
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-294459A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-294459A1.txt
    • 10606.25000 39-55-19.6 N CA MD WML483 122-02-29.9 W 0004011691 Sacramento Valley Limited Partnership VINA 10/28/2009 10955.00000 39-55-19.6 N CA MD WQHQ838 123-05-25.5 W 0004011695 Willits Online LLC Willits 10/28/2009 06034.15000 39-30-58.1 N WY MD WQCT958 107-43-58.7 W 0004011963 Union Telephone Company Baggs 10/29/2009 06595.00000 41-23-00.4 N ME MD WPNG916 070-31-25.8 W 0004011975 New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC BIDDEFORD 10/29/2009 06034.15000 43-29-00.5 N ME MD WPNG916 070-31-25.8 W 0004011975 New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC BIDDEFORD 10/29/2009 06256.54000 43-29-00.5 N ME MD WPNG916 070-31-25.8 W 0004011975 New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC BIDDEFORD 10/29/2009 06372.67000 43-29-00.5 N Page 21 CF - Common Carrier Fixed Point to Point Microwave State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-294598A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-294598A1.txt
    • HOLDINGS IIIRALEIGH 10/30/2009 11345.00000 35-55-32.4 N NC NE 078-32-15.8 W 0004014091 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIRALEIGH 10/30/2009 11505.00000 35-55-32.4 N NC NE 078-32-15.8 W 0004014091 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIRALEIGH 10/30/2009 11665.00000 35-55-32.4 N NC NE 078-32-15.8 W 0004014091 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIRALEIGH 10/30/2009 17815.00000 35-55-32.4 N NC NE 078-32-15.8 W 0004014091 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIRALEIGH 10/30/2009 17915.00000 35-55-32.4 N NC NE 078-42-00.5 W 0004014092 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIRALEIGH 10/30/2009 21825.00000 35-52-42.6 N NC NE 078-47-05.0 W 0004014093 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIAPEX 10/30/2009 17815.00000 35-40-45.0 N NC NE 078-47-05.0 W 0004014093 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIAPEX 10/30/2009 17915.00000 35-40-45.0 N MD NE 077-12-05.4 W 0004014121 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIRockville 10/30/2009 21875.00000 39-03-32.5 N Page 33 MG - Microwave Industrial/Business Pool State Purpose Call Sign
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-294599A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-294599A1.txt
    • MD KNKN229 122-01-16.9 W 0004023861 SACRAMENTO VALLEY LIMITED PARTNPrinceton 11/06/2009 39-24-49.5 N IK - Industrial/Business Pool - Commercial, Conventional State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City RM WZS581 A 0004022236 PIOTROWSKI Mr., RAYMOND M 11/05/2009 00466.37500 NY RM WZS581 X 0004022236 PIOTROWSKI Mr., RAYMOND M 11/05/2009 00466.37500 NY RM WZS581 074-04-00.5 W 0004022236 PIOTROWSKI Mr., RAYMOND M ROTTERDAM 11/05/2009 00461.37500 42-51-06.3 N RO WPGJ266 0004022752 AFTON COMMUNICATIONS CORPORAT 11/05/2009 RO WPGI413 0004023064 T&K COMMUNICATIONS INC 11/05/2009 RO WNKS280 0004023615 Princeton Calais Translators INC 11/06/2009 RO WNQU404 0004023644 SIS Q COMMUNICATIONS 11/06/2009 MG - Microwave Industrial/Business Pool State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-294681A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-294681A1.txt
    • 0004029754 Jefferson Regional Medical Center Pine Bluff, AR 11/12/2009 10815.00000 34-32-54.3 N AR NE 092-01-02.6 W 0004029755 Jefferson Regional Medical Center Pine Bluff, AR 11/12/2009 17815.00000 34-11-17.0 N AR NE 092-03-19.2 W 0004029756 Jefferson Regional Medical Center Pine Bluff, AR 11/12/2009 19375.00000 34-11-29.8 N MD NE 077-03-26.0 W 0004029786 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIISilver Spring 11/12/2009 21875.00000 39-01-11.5 N MD NE 076-46-00.5 W 0004029787 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIBowie 11/12/2009 17815.00000 38-59-48.5 N MD NE 077-00-57.6 W 0004029788 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIFort Washington 11/12/2009 21825.00000 38-46-54.4 N VA NE 077-27-43.6 W 0004029789 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIDulles 11/12/2009 23375.00000 39-00-48.3 N VA NE 077-05-54.2 W 0004029790 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIAlexandria 11/12/2009 22175.00000 38-47-16.4 N MD NE 077-15-14.0 W 0004029792 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIGaithersburg 11/12/2009
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-294834A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-294834A1.txt
    • ALLTEL Communications of Southern MicBENTON HARBOR 11/19/2009 42-09-29.3 N VA MD KNKN714 078-47-20.7 W 0004039597 Virginia Cellular LLC Broadway 11/20/2009 38-35-09.4 N ND MD KNKN321 103-37-02.4 W 0004040378 NORTHWEST DAKOTA CELLULAR OF NFortana 11/20/2009 48-51-16.2 N CT MD KNKA404 072-58-55.9 W 0004040505 Cellco Partnership West Hartford 11/20/2009 41-58-43.3 N NC MD KNKN770 078-11-55.6 W 0004040515 Alltel Communications, LLC NORLINA 11/20/2009 36-28-00.5 N Page 13 CL - Cellular State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City NC MD KNKN641 076-48-51.2 W 0004040720 Alltel Communications, LLC PINETOWN 11/20/2009 35-31-24.9 N NC MD KNKN641 076-20-34.2 W 0004040720 Alltel Communications, LLC SWANQUARTER 11/20/2009 35-25-13.0 N GX - SMR, 806-821/851-866 MHz, Conventional State Purpose Call Sign Longitude
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-294928A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-294928A1.txt
    • Dripping Springs 11/13/2009 00024.64000 30-12-34.2 N TX NE 098-01-41.8 W 0003957335 Sloop III, John A Dripping Springs 11/13/2009 00026.14000 30-12-34.2 N TX NE 098-01-41.8 W 0003957335 Sloop III, John A Dripping Springs 11/13/2009 00026.14140 30-12-34.2 N MG - Microwave Industrial/Business Pool State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City NC AM 078-42-00.5 W 0004014092 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIRALEIGH 11/25/2009 21825.00000 35-52-42.6 N NC AM 078-42-00.5 W 0004014092 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIRALEIGH 11/25/2009 21925.00000 35-52-42.6 N NV AM WQJL988 115-16-44.4 W 0004036358 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS II LAS VEGAS 11/25/2009 23025.00000 36-11-10.3 N NV AM WQJL988 115-16-44.4 W 0004036358 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS II LAS VEGAS 11/25/2009 23075.00000 36-11-10.3 N NV AM WQJL988 115-16-44.4 W
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-294929A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-294929A1.txt
    • Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City OR MD WPTY560 124-12-40.5 W 0004046792 Edge Wireless, LLC Coquille 11/27/2009 06815.00000 43-11-31.6 N OR MD WPTY560 124-12-40.5 W 0004046792 Edge Wireless, LLC Coquille 11/27/2009 10755.00000 43-11-31.6 N WA NE 119-50-34.4 W 0004046211 Verizon Wireless (VAW) LLC Moxee 11/25/2009 06645.00000 46-36-45.7 N PR NE 066-49-27.5 W 0004046219 PR Wireless, Inc. Hatillo 11/25/2009 11642.50000 18-29-00.5 N PR NE 066-36-51.0 W 0004046221 PR Wireless, Inc. Ponce 11/25/2009 19675.00000 17-59-33.2 N PR NE 066-20-26.2 W 0004046380 PR Wireless, Inc. Corozal 11/25/2009 11627.50000 18-16-01.2 N PR NE 066-17-05.0 W 0004046381 PR Wireless, Inc. Naranjito 11/25/2009 11137.50000 18-14-58.8 N PR NE 066-10-10.9 W 0004046442 PR Wireless, Inc. Bayamon 11/25/2009 19525.00000 18-23-19.0 N CL - Cellular State Purpose Call Sign
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295089A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295089A1.txt
    • 46-29-53.9 N WA NE 117-52-32.0 W 0004048956 Columbia Rural Electric Assocation Inc DAYTON 11/30/2009 10715.00000 46-18-06.0 N IL NE P 088-18-22.7 W 0004049065 WEST PRAIRIE WATER COMPANY ARCOLA 12/01/2009 00956.29375 39-41-04.3 N TX NE 102-28-08.9 W 0004049086 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIOdessa 12/01/2009 11225.00000 31-50-40.9 N TX NE 102-28-08.9 W 0004049086 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIOdessa 12/01/2009 11345.00000 31-50-40.9 N TX NE 099-44-00.5 W 0004049101 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIAbilene 12/01/2009 21825.00000 32-27-05.3 N TX NE 099-44-00.5 W 0004049101 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIAbilene 12/01/2009 21925.00000 32-27-05.3 N TX NE 099-44-00.5 W 0004049101 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIAbilene 12/01/2009 21975.00000 32-27-05.3 N TX NE 099-44-00.5 W 0004049101 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIAbilene 12/01/2009 22075.00000 32-27-05.3 N TX NE 100-57-55.5 W 0004049113 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIPampa 12/01/2009 10835.00000
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295091A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295091A1.txt
    • WATER CONSERVPEORIA 12/04/2009 06404.79000 33-50-48.2 N AZ MD WNEP700 112-16-38.1 W 0004054105 CENTRAL ARIZONA WATER CONSERVPEORIA 12/04/2009 06615.62500 33-50-48.2 N AZ MD WNEF381 113-38-05.7 W 0004054106 CENTRAL ARIZONA WATER CONSERVSALOME 12/04/2009 06560.62500 33-36-00.1 N AZ MD WNEF381 113-38-05.7 W 0004054106 CENTRAL ARIZONA WATER CONSERVSALOME 12/04/2009 06655.00000 33-36-00.1 N AZ MD WNEF378 112-04-06.2 W 0004054107 CENTRAL ARIZONA WATER CONSERVPHOENIX 12/04/2009 06595.00000 33-42-00.5 N AZ MD WNEF378 112-04-06.2 W 0004054107 CENTRAL ARIZONA WATER CONSERVPHOENIX 12/04/2009 06805.00000 33-42-00.5 N AZ MD WNEF378 112-04-06.2 W 0004054107 CENTRAL ARIZONA WATER CONSERVPHOENIX 12/04/2009 06815.00000 33-42-00.5 N AZ MD WNEF378 112-04-06.2 W 0004054107 CENTRAL ARIZONA WATER CONSERVPHOENIX 12/04/2009 11245.00000 33-42-00.5 N MI NE S 0004049602 County of Monroe, Michigan 12/01/2009 06430.00000 MI NE S 0004049602 County of Monroe,
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295212A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295212A1.txt
    • 6.8 * Illinois 95.0 95.9 0.9 Indiana 90.3 92.3 2.0 Iowa 95.4 98.3 2.9 Kansas 94.9 97.1 2.2 Kentucky 86.9 94.8 7.9 * Louisiana 88.9 94.9 6.0 Maine 90.7 97.1 6.3 * Maryland 96.3 95.0 -1.3 Massachusetts 94.3 98.2 3.9 Michigan 93.8 97.1 3.3 Minnesota 96.4 98.1 1.7 Mississippi 82.4 94.1 11.8 * Missouri 92.1 95.1 3.1 Montana 92.8 92.3 -0.5 Nebraska 94.0 95.9 1.9 Nevada 89.4 94.4 5.0 * New Hampshire 95.0 98.0 3.1 New Jersey 94.1 95.1 0.9 New Mexico 85.3 95.3 9.9 * New York 90.8 95.4 4.5 * North Carolina 89.3 95.5 6.2 * North Dakota 95.1 98.3 3.2 Ohio 92.2 96.6 4.4 * Oklahoma 91.5 97.3 5.8 * Oregon 91.2 97.3 6.1 * Pennsylvania 95.1 97.9
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295252A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295252A1.txt
    • 119-54-37.0 W 0004061855 Verizon Wireless (VAW) LLC BICKLETON 12/11/2009 11115.00000 45-51-19.0 N CA MD WMR929 124-07-12.1 W 0004061951 CALIFORNIA RURAL SERVICE AREA #1SCOTIA 12/11/2009 02165.20000 40-24-57.4 N CA MD WMR929 124-07-12.1 W 0004061951 CALIFORNIA RURAL SERVICE AREA #1SCOTIA 12/11/2009 05945.20000 40-24-57.4 N CA MD WMR929 124-07-12.1 W 0004061951 CALIFORNIA RURAL SERVICE AREA #1SCOTIA 12/11/2009 05974.85000 40-24-57.4 N CA MD WMR928 123-44-00.5 W 0004061952 CALIFORNIA RURAL SERVICE AREA #1WILLOW CREEK 12/11/2009 02115.20000 40-52-27.4 N CA MD WMR928 123-44-00.5 W 0004061952 CALIFORNIA RURAL SERVICE AREA #1WILLOW CREEK 12/11/2009 06545.00000 40-52-27.4 N CA MD WMR928 123-44-00.5 W 0004061952 CALIFORNIA RURAL SERVICE AREA #1WILLOW CREEK 12/11/2009 10628.75000 40-52-27.4 N CA MD WMR928 123-44-00.5 W 0004061952 CALIFORNIA RURAL SERVICE AREA #1WILLOW CREEK 12/11/2009 10647.50000 40-52-27.4 N
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295338A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295338A1.txt
    • HOLDINGS IIIAustin 12/18/2009 19575.00000 30-13-53.3 N TX AM 097-48-06.1 W 0004007043 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIAustin 12/18/2009 19625.00000 30-13-53.3 N TX AM 097-48-06.1 W 0004007043 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIAustin 12/18/2009 19675.00000 30-13-53.3 N TX AM 097-48-06.1 W 0004007043 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIAustin 12/18/2009 21925.00000 30-13-53.3 N TX AM 097-48-06.1 W 0004007043 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIAustin 12/18/2009 22025.00000 30-13-53.3 N TX AM 097-48-00.5 W 0004007044 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIAustin 12/18/2009 17815.00000 30-15-09.4 N TX AM 097-48-00.5 W 0004007044 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIAustin 12/18/2009 17915.00000 30-15-09.4 N TX AM 097-48-00.5 W 0004007044 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIAustin 12/18/2009 17965.00000 30-15-09.4 N TX AM 097-48-00.5 W 0004007044 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIAustin 12/18/2009 18065.00000 30-15-09.4 N TX AM 097-48-00.5 W 0004007044 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIAustin 12/18/2009 23075.00000
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295339A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295339A1.txt
    • 47-52-06.0 N MN NE 090-08-39.0 W 0004064790 Minnesota, State of HOVLAND 12/15/2009 11133.12500 47-52-06.0 N MN NE 089-45-30.8 W 0004064801 Minnesota, State of Grand Portage 12/15/2009 06548.75000 47-58-27.9 N AZ NE 110-58-18.4 W 0004064844 North West Fire District TUCSON 12/15/2009 17820.00000 32-13-21.3 N UT NE 110-10-06.4 W 0004065664 Emery County Sheriff's Office Green River 12/16/2009 19330.00000 38-59-05.4 N MN NE 095-08-00.5 W 0004065898 Minnesota, State of Lakefield 12/16/2009 06226.89000 43-41-16.7 N MN NE 095-08-00.5 W 0004065898 Minnesota, State of Lakefield 12/16/2009 06286.19000 43-41-16.7 N CA NE 121-49-06.5 W 0004065936 ALAMEDA, COUNTY OF Livermore 12/16/2009 10622.50000 37-42-39.7 N CA NE 121-49-06.5 W 0004065936 ALAMEDA, COUNTY OF Livermore 12/16/2009 11405.00000 37-42-39.7 N CA NE 121-49-06.5 W 0004065936 ALAMEDA, COUNTY OF Livermore 12/16/2009 11445.00000
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295377A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295377A1.txt
    • 1.0 77.6 65.8 44.7 634.7 For Unscheduled Events Over 2 Minutes 10.5 83.4 70.7 672.0 1.0 70.3 65.5 37.4 634.1 For Unscheduled Downtime More than 2 Minutes Number of Occurrences or Events 3.0 7.0 6.0 3.0 1.0 19.0 4.0 13.0 115.0 Events per Hundred Switches 0.2 0.4 0.8 0.2 0.6 1.5 0.4 0.9 4.8 Events per Million Access Lines 0.3 0.5 0.5 0.3 0.7 1.9 0.4 0.9 10.5 Average Outage Duration in Minutes 83.8 319.2 152.8 5939.8 3.0 80.4 257.4 67.2 221.6 Average Lines Affected per Event in Thousands 8.7 7.0 23.1 13.2 24.8 8.6 0.5 13.3 2.2 Outage Line-Minutes per Event in Thousands 185.9 486.6 4430.7 7541.0 74.4174.2 74.5 1319.3 219.6 Outage Line-Minutes per 1,000 Access Lines 48.0 219.5 2169.4
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295406A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295406A1.txt
    • HOLDINGS IIIAUSTIN 12/21/2009 19675.00000 30-17-53.9 N TX AM 097-49-55.5 W 0003971801 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIAUSTIN 12/21/2009 23125.00000 30-17-53.9 N TX AM 097-49-55.5 W 0003971801 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIAUSTIN 12/21/2009 23225.00000 30-17-53.9 N TX AM 097-47-12.8 W 0004006112 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIAustin 12/21/2009 22025.00000 30-16-10.2 N TX AM 097-47-12.8 W 0004006112 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIAustin 12/21/2009 23025.00000 30-16-10.2 N TX AM 097-48-00.5 W 0004007044 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIAustin 12/21/2009 17815.00000 30-15-09.4 N TX AM 097-48-00.5 W 0004007044 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIAustin 12/21/2009 17915.00000 30-15-09.4 N TX AM 097-48-00.5 W 0004007044 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIAustin 12/21/2009 17965.00000 30-15-09.4 N TX AM 097-48-00.5 W 0004007044 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIAustin 12/21/2009 18065.00000 30-15-09.4 N Page 7 MG - Microwave Industrial/Business Pool State Purpose Call Sign
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A1.txt
    • Data and Other Mobile Service 14 14 1.2 17 36 53 6 Providers Wireless Service Providers 30,220 29,687 1.8 3,103 58,376 61,479 15,414 Interexchange Carriers (IXCs) 18,904 18,686 1.2 3,940 12,682 16,622 9,237 Operator Service Providers (OSPs) 187 168 10.6 19 468 487 90 Prepaid Calling Card Providers 1,472 1,461 0.7 126 756 882 691 Satellite Service Providers 356 354 0.5 128 216 344 208 Toll Resellers 4,693 4,521 3.7 969 3,027 3,996 2,164 VoIP Toll Provider 974 Audio Bridge Service Provider Other Toll Carriers 428 421 1.8 243 447 201 Toll Service Providers 27,100 26,639 1.7 6,155 17,738 23,893 12,921 All Filers $76,510 $75,2594/ 1.6% $30,165 $113,860 $144,025 $37,891 LIRE Exemption ($3,163) Total less LIRE $72,096 See notes at end
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A11.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A11.txt
    • 7.2 8.6 Average Repair Interval (hours) 115.5 7.2 21.1 71.4 3.8 23.5 20.3 3.6 11.2 LOCAL SERVICES PROVIDED TO RESIDENTIAL AND BUSINESS CUSTOMERS Percent Installation Commitments Met 98.3 99.5 95.1 97.6 96.5 90.4 96.2 96.8 96.6 Residence 99.0 99.7 95.2 97.9 96.8 91.8 96.4 97.2 96.9 Business 95.7 99.1 94.5 96.2 95.2 80.8 95.3 93.5 92.7 Average Installation Interval (days) 0.5 2.2 6.1 4.6 1.6 3.5 2.9 3.6 4.6 Residence 0.4 1.8 6.1 4.4 1.5 3.5 2.9 3.6 4.7 Business 1.2 4.1 6.0 5.6 2.0 3.2 2.7 3.6 4.7 Average Out of Service Repair Interval (hours) 17.0 23.7 23.7 24.6 19.9 32.3 17.4 16.1 16.0 Residence 17.1 24.9 24.1 25.2 20.1 35.7 18.1 16.5 16.1 Business 16.1 15.7 20.8 21.8 18.4
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A3.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A3.txt
    • Data and Other Mobile Service 14 14 1.2 17 36 53 6 Providers Wireless Service Providers 30,220 29,687 1.8 3,103 58,376 61,479 15,414 Interexchange Carriers (IXCs) 18,904 18,686 1.2 3,940 12,682 16,622 9,237 Operator Service Providers (OSPs) 187 168 10.6 19 468 487 90 Prepaid Calling Card Providers 1,472 1,461 0.7 126 756 882 691 Satellite Service Providers 356 354 0.5 128 216 344 208 Toll Resellers 4,693 4,521 3.7 969 3,027 3,996 2,164 VoIP Toll Provider 974 Audio Bridge Service Provider Other Toll Carriers 428 421 1.8 243 447 201 Toll Service Providers 27,100 26,639 1.7 6,155 17,738 23,893 12,921 All Filers $76,510 $75,2594/ 1.6% $30,165 $113,860 $144,025 $37,891 LIRE Exemption ($3,163) Total less LIRE $72,096 See notes at end
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A5.txt
    • Total 56 126 183 500 602 757 91510281072113211881263169017182235259229353265346837964110428944784457 198619871988198919901991199219931994199519961997199819992000200120022003200420052006200720082009 3 - 14 YearCompaniesHigh-Cost Loop Support Safety Net Additive Support Safety Valve Support High-Cost Model Support Long- Term Support Interstate Common Line Support Interstate Access Support Local Switching Support Total Support ILECs 864.2 - - - 472.9 - - 380.3 1,717.4 1999 CETCs 0.1 - - - 0.4 - - 0.0 0.5 Total 864.3 - - - 473.3 - - 380.3 1,718.0 ILECs 873.8 - - 218.7 477.3 - 278.8 384.7 2,233.3 2000 CETCs 0.4 - - 0.0 1.1 - 0.0 0.0 1.5 Total 874.1 - - 218.7 478.4 - 278.8 384.7 2,234.8 ILECs 921.5 - - 205.4 484.2 - 575.7 387.9 2,574.7 2001 CETCs 5.7 - - 0.3 8.0 - 1.0
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A8.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A8.txt
    • 2004 2005 6 - 15 Table 6.5 Telephone Penetration by State (Annual Average Percentage of Households with Telephone Service) State 1984 2008 Change Alabama 88.4% 94.0% 5.6% * Alaska 86.5 96.4 9.8 * Arizona 86.9 94.6 7.6 * Arkansas 86.6 92.9 6.3 * California 92.5 96.5 4.0 * Colorado 93.2 98.0 4.8 * Connecticut 95.5 97.1 1.6 Delaware 94.3 94.7 0.5 District of Columbia 94.9 92.0 -2.9 Florida 88.7 93.0 4.3 * Georgia 86.2 92.9 6.7 * Hawaii 93.5 96.5 2.9 Idaho 90.7 96.0 5.3 * Illinois 94.2 94.1 -0.1 Indiana 91.6 92.1 0.5 Iowa 96.2 97.4 1.2 Kansas 94.3 96.4 2.0 Kentucky 88.1 94.1 5.9 * Louisiana 89.7 95.7 6.0 * Maine 93.4 97.8 4.4 * Maryland 95.7 94.7 -1.0
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A9.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A9.txt
    • 15.6 14.6 15.9 6.2 8.0 1982 10.8 9.0 2.7 3.9 4.2 1.7 1983 3.1 0.2 1.4 0.0 7.4 3.9 1984 17.2 10.4 -4.3 -5.1 3.6 3.8 1985 8.9 12.4 -3.7 -3.0 0.6 2.1 1986 7.1 8.9 -9.4 -10.0 0.3 -3.5 1987 3.3 2.6 -12.4 -11.8 -3.0 -3.0 1988 4.5 4.6 -4.2 -2.1 -4.2 -3.8 1989 0.6 1.9 -1.3 -1.7 -2.6 0.5 1990 1.0 1.5 -3.7 -0.1 -2.2 -2.2 1991 5.1 2.1 1.3 -1.3 -1.5 -2.6 1992 0.5 -0.2 -1.3 1.0 -2.4 1.3 1993 1.0 0.8 6.5 3.8 0.2 -1.1 1994 -0.3 0.7 5.4 6.1 -1.0 -1.4 1995 2.6 ** 0.1 ** -3.8 ** 1996 0.9 0.2 3.7 0.8 6.1 0.9 1997 1.0 0.1 -4.3 7.8 2.8 -4.3 1998 1.3 0.0 -0.8
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295961A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295961A1.txt
    • NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS PCS, LLC 01/19/2010 RO WPON661 0004095253 New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC 01/19/2010 RO WPON695 0004095254 New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC 01/19/2010 RO WAS436 0004098589 ALASCOM, INC. 01/21/2010 CL - Cellular State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City NJ MD KNKA512 074-59-36.1 W 0004094303 Cellco Partnership Vineland 01/19/2010 39-30-00.5 N NM MD KNKR219 107-00-34.3 W 0004094695 Verizon Wireless (VAW) LLC Cuba 01/19/2010 36-02-00.2 N OH MD KNKN914 080-50-18.1 W 0004096659 ALLTEL Communications of Ohio No. 3, InSALEM 01/19/2010 40-50-28.0 N MO MD KNKN568 089-49-01.0 W 0004096886 Cellco Partnership Risco 01/20/2010 36-33-25.3 N IA MD KNKA295 095-15-01.5 W 0004098025 ALLTEL Communications of Nebraska, IncGriswold 01/20/2010 41-14-34.4 N MI MD KNKA244
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-296129A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-296129A1.txt
    • 112-07-04.7 W 0004102099 ALLTEL Communications of the SouthwesPRESCOTT 01/26/2010 11035.00000 34-41-13.8 N AZ MD WPJC231 112-07-04.7 W 0004102099 ALLTEL Communications of the SouthwesPRESCOTT 01/26/2010 11185.00000 34-41-13.8 N AZ MD WPJC231 112-07-04.7 W 0004102099 ALLTEL Communications of the SouthwesPRESCOTT 01/26/2010 19360.00000 34-41-13.8 N AZ MD WPJC231 112-07-04.7 W 0004102099 ALLTEL Communications of the SouthwesPRESCOTT 01/26/2010 19630.00000 34-41-13.8 N AZ MD WMR827 112-07-00.5 W 0004102100 Verizon Wireless (VAW) LLC COTTONWOOD 01/26/2010 05945.20000 34-42-06.0 N AZ MD WMR827 112-07-00.5 W 0004102100 Verizon Wireless (VAW) LLC COTTONWOOD 01/26/2010 06123.10000 34-42-06.0 N AZ MD WMR827 112-07-00.5 W 0004102100 Verizon Wireless (VAW) LLC COTTONWOOD 01/26/2010 10795.00000 34-42-06.0 N AZ MD WMR827 112-07-00.5 W 0004102100 Verizon Wireless (VAW) LLC COTTONWOOD 01/26/2010 10955.00000 34-42-06.0 N Page 12 CF -
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-296239A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-296239A1.txt
    • 1.1 1.5 2.5 0.8 2.8 4.1 13.9 53.0 22.6 0.3 97.5 100.0 FTTP 0.2 0.0 0.2 0.7 1.4 2.7 24.2 1.3 68.4 1.2 99.8 100.0 Satellite 53.2 35.0 88.3 * * * * 0.0 0.0 0.0 11.7 100.0 Fixed Wireless 14.2 4.5 18.7 20.8 22.3 25.2 9.2 1.9 1.8 0.2 81.3 100.0 Mobile Wireless 30.2 11.9 42.1 17.1 33.3 7.0 0.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 57.9 100.0 Power Line and Other 0.0 0.0 0.0 * * * * 0.0 * 0.0 100.0 100.0 Total 9.6 6.3 15.9 6.9 15.5 13.2 14.8 22.3 11.3 0.2 84.1 100.0 # = Rounds to Zero. * = Data withheld to maintain firm confidentiality. Note: Figures may not sum to totals due to rounding. Source: FCC Form
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-296276A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-296276A1.txt
    • HOLDINGS IIIBaltimore 02/08/2010 21875.00000 39-18-35.2 N MD MD WQKU651 076-39-45.9 W 0004119251 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIBaltimore 02/08/2010 21925.00000 39-18-35.2 N MD MD WQKU651 076-39-45.9 W 0004119251 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIBaltimore 02/08/2010 21975.00000 39-18-35.2 N MD MD WQKU651 076-39-45.9 W 0004119251 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIBaltimore 02/08/2010 22025.00000 39-18-35.2 N MD MD WQKW490 076-35-13.6 W 0004119252 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIBaltimore 02/08/2010 19375.00000 39-22-00.5 N MD MD WQKW490 076-35-13.6 W 0004119252 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIBaltimore 02/08/2010 19475.00000 39-22-00.5 N MD MD WQKW490 076-35-13.6 W 0004119252 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIBaltimore 02/08/2010 19575.00000 39-22-00.5 N MD MD WQKW490 076-35-13.6 W 0004119252 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIBaltimore 02/08/2010 19675.00000 39-22-00.5 N MD MD WQKW490 076-35-13.6 W 0004119252 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIBaltimore 02/08/2010 22175.00000 39-22-00.5 N MD MD WQKW490
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-296461A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-296461A1.txt
    • MO MD WQFD335 091-44-58.0 W 0004131327 USCOC OF GREATER MISSOURI, LLCROLLA 02/19/2010 06785.00000 37-58-54.0 N MO MD WQFD335 091-44-58.0 W 0004131327 USCOC OF GREATER MISSOURI, LLCROLLA 02/19/2010 10572.50000 37-58-54.0 N TX NE 101-06-57.7 W 0004125852 Conterra Ultra Broadband, LLC OZONA 02/16/2010 06226.89000 30-42-26.2 N TX NE 101-06-57.7 W 0004125852 Conterra Ultra Broadband, LLC OZONA 02/16/2010 17770.00000 30-42-26.2 N TX NE 101-12-00.5 W 0004125853 Conterra Ultra Broadband, LLC Ozona 02/16/2010 19330.00000 30-42-47.2 N TX NE 100-12-42.6 W 0004125855 Conterra Ultra Broadband, LLC Fort McKavett 02/16/2010 05974.85000 30-52-49.9 N TX NE 100-12-42.6 W 0004125855 Conterra Ultra Broadband, LLC Fort McKavett 02/16/2010 11325.00000 30-52-49.9 N TX NE 099-45-55.7 W 0004125858 Conterra Ultra Broadband, LLC Menard 02/16/2010 06226.89000 30-51-06.6 N TX NE 099-45-55.7 W 0004125858
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-296480A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-296480A1.txt
    • 39 0.7 120 2.2 96 1.7 36 0.7 3,646 66.5 5,481 American Samoa 26 87.9 0 0.0 1 2.6 0 0.0 1 3.0 2 6.5 30 Arizona 13,419 63.0 89 0.4 163 0.8 743 3.5 238 1.1 6,650 31.2 21,303 Arkansas 5,118 35.4 421 2.9 50 0.3 285 2.0 166 1.1 8,412 58.2 14,453 California 82,747 53.1 1,794 1.2 723 0.5 4,463 2.9 3,071 2.0 63,042 40.5 155,841 Colorado 12,325 58.5 56 0.3 124 0.6 611 2.9 372 1.8 7,581 36.0 21,069 Connecticut 7,926 52.5 284 1.9 91 0.6 352 2.3 200 1.3 6,251 41.4 15,104 Delaware 2,670 56.8 13 0.3 42 0.9 147 3.1 29 0.6 1,799 38.3 4,700 District of Columbia 4,341 73.3 2 0.0 73 1.2 220 3.7
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-296634A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-296634A1.txt
    • OPEN RANGE COMMUNICATIONS JOHNSTOWN 02/23/2010 21975.00000 40-23-30.5 N MD AM 077-04-57.4 W 0004020368 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIOlney 02/24/2010 17915.00000 39-08-26.2 N TX AM WPZF501 106-29-00.8 W 0004023804 Board of Regents of New Mexico State UnEl Paso 02/22/2010 23435.00000 31-48-18.9 N TX AM 106-30-47.2 W 0004026368 Board of Regents of New Mexico State UnEL PASO 02/22/2010 23535.00000 31-47-35.7 N MD AM 076-46-00.5 W 0004029787 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIBowie 02/24/2010 17915.00000 38-59-48.5 N PR AM 066-03-20.0 W 0004077098 Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp. Caguas 01/11/2010 10895.00000 18-16-07.4 N PR AM 066-03-20.0 W 0004077098 Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp. Caguas 01/11/2010 17980.00000 18-16-07.4 N CO AM WQKN714 105-04-47.7 W 0004092072 OPEN RANGE COMMUNICATIONS Loveland 02/23/2010 10835.00000 40-21-01.5 N CO AM WQKN714 105-04-47.7 W 0004092072 OPEN RANGE
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-296635A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-296635A1.txt
    • 088-01-14.6 W 0004135851 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIROLLING MEADOW 02/24/2010 11505.00000 42-03-31.9 N IL MD WQLI506 088-01-14.6 W 0004135851 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIROLLING MEADOW 02/24/2010 11585.00000 42-03-31.9 N IL MD WQLI506 088-01-14.6 W 0004135851 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIROLLING MEADOW 02/24/2010 23075.00000 42-03-31.9 N IL MD WQLI506 088-01-14.6 W 0004135851 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIROLLING MEADOW 02/24/2010 23175.00000 42-03-31.9 N IL MD WQKZ891 088-14-00.5 W 0004135853 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIELGIN 02/24/2010 10815.00000 42-01-30.4 N IL MD WQKZ891 088-14-00.5 W 0004135853 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIELGIN 02/24/2010 10895.00000 42-01-30.4 N Page 21 MG - Microwave Industrial/Business Pool State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City IL MD WQKZ891 088-14-00.5 W 0004135853 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIELGIN 02/24/2010 10935.00000
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-296750A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-296750A1.txt
    • OH NE 083-50-36.5 W 0004144556 SPRINGFIELD BECKLEY MUNICIPAL AISPRINGFIELD 03/03/2010 00120.70000 39-50-34.6 N OH NE 083-50-36.5 W 0004144556 SPRINGFIELD BECKLEY MUNICIPAL AISPRINGFIELD 03/03/2010 00121.70000 39-50-34.6 N AI - Aural Intercity Relay State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City HI NE 157-48-53.1 W 0004141723 HAWAII PUBLIC RADIO, INC. Honolulu 03/02/2010 00948.25000 21-20-00.5 N HI NE 157-48-53.2 W 0004141725 HAWAII PUBLIC RADIO, INC. Honolulu 03/02/2010 00950.75000 21-20-00.5 N Page 1 AS - Aural Studio Transmitter Link State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City DC AM WLO429 077-04-27.9 W 0004105529 BONNEVILLE HOLDING COMPANY WASHINGTON 03/03/2010 00950.00000 38-56-08.3 N AL NE 086-14-04.7 W 0004141759 BLUEWATER
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-296751A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-296751A1.txt
    • 03/02/2010 22075.00000 34-01-03.8 N CA NE 118-26-55.5 W 0004142388 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIILos Angeles 03/02/2010 19375.00000 34-02-49.7 N CA NE 118-26-55.5 W 0004142388 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIILos Angeles 03/02/2010 19475.00000 34-02-49.7 N CA NE 118-08-03.9 W 0004142389 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIMontebello 03/02/2010 21925.00000 34-01-20.4 N CA NE 118-08-03.9 W 0004142389 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIMontebello 03/02/2010 22075.00000 34-01-20.4 N CA NE 118-18-00.5 W 0004142390 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIILos Angeles 03/02/2010 23125.00000 34-04-38.6 N CA NE 118-18-00.5 W 0004142390 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIILos Angeles 03/02/2010 23275.00000 34-04-38.6 N CA NE 117-52-29.0 W 0004142391 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIICity of Industry 03/02/2010 23275.00000 33-59-43.0 N TX NE 096-07-01.7 W 0004142393 EnCana Oil & Gas (USA) Inc. FLYNN 03/02/2010 00942.57500 31-08-37.0 N TX NE 096-24-40.5 W
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-296906A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-296906A1.txt
    • Name Latitude City AK AM 134-02-17.3 W 0003957463 ALASCOM, INC. Juneau 03/09/2010 00933.57500 58-09-04.8 N AK AM 134-02-17.3 W 0003957463 ALASCOM, INC. Juneau 03/08/2010 00933.57500 58-09-04.8 N CA AM WPVP593 122-58-51.1 W 0004061946 CALIFORNIA RURAL SERVICE AREA #1Weaverville 03/08/2010 06256.54000 40-43-09.0 N CA AM WPVP593 122-58-51.1 W 0004061946 CALIFORNIA RURAL SERVICE AREA #1Weaverville 03/08/2010 06803.75000 40-43-09.0 N CA AM WMR928 123-44-00.5 W 0004061952 CALIFORNIA RURAL SERVICE AREA #1WILLOW CREEK 03/08/2010 02115.20000 40-52-27.4 N CA AM WMR928 123-44-00.5 W 0004061952 CALIFORNIA RURAL SERVICE AREA #1WILLOW CREEK 03/08/2010 06004.50000 40-52-27.4 N CA AM WMR928 123-44-00.5 W 0004061952 CALIFORNIA RURAL SERVICE AREA #1WILLOW CREEK 03/08/2010 10628.75000 40-52-27.4 N CA AM WMR928 123-44-00.5 W 0004061952 CALIFORNIA RURAL SERVICE AREA #1WILLOW CREEK 03/08/2010 10647.50000 40-52-27.4 N
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-296907A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-296907A1.txt
    • N WA MD WMN562 122-57-55.0 W 0004156718 MCDANIEL CELLULAR TELEPHONE COCHEHALIS 03/11/2010 06626.25000 46-40-06.0 N WA MD WMN562 122-57-55.0 W 0004156718 MCDANIEL CELLULAR TELEPHONE COCHEHALIS 03/11/2010 06656.25000 46-40-06.0 N WA MD WMN562 122-57-55.0 W 0004156718 MCDANIEL CELLULAR TELEPHONE COCHEHALIS 03/11/2010 11405.00000 46-40-06.0 N WA MD WMN562 122-57-55.0 W 0004156718 MCDANIEL CELLULAR TELEPHONE COCHEHALIS 03/11/2010 11565.00000 46-40-06.0 N WA MD WQJN903 124-03-00.5 W 0004158456 MCDANIEL CELLULAR TELEPHONE COIIWACO 03/11/2010 10955.00000 46-18-45.0 N WA MD WMQ373 123-53-48.5 W 0004158573 MCDANIEL CELLULAR TELEPHONE COCHINOOK 03/11/2010 06615.00000 46-17-11.4 N WA MD WMQ373 123-53-48.5 W 0004158573 MCDANIEL CELLULAR TELEPHONE COCHINOOK 03/11/2010 11445.00000 46-17-11.4 N WA MD WMQ374 123-33-02.5 W 0004158578 MCDANIEL CELLULAR TELEPHONE COFRANCE 03/11/2010 06745.00000 46-27-40.4 N WA MD WMQ374 123-33-02.5 W 0004158578 MCDANIEL CELLULAR
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-296908A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-296908A1.txt
    • W 0004159970 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIBear 03/12/2010 21875.00000 39-39-22.0 N DE NE 075-39-23.0 W 0004159970 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIBear 03/12/2010 21975.00000 39-39-22.0 N DE NE 075-39-23.0 W 0004159970 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIBear 03/12/2010 22025.00000 39-39-22.0 N DE NE 075-43-26.4 W 0004159972 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIINewark 03/12/2010 23275.00000 39-41-28.2 N PA NE 075-24-35.9 W 0004159973 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIISkippack 03/12/2010 23075.00000 40-14-00.5 N PA NE 075-00-51.7 W 0004159975 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIFeasterville-Trevose 03/12/2010 23225.00000 40-09-31.5 N NJ NE 074-44-09.6 W 0004159976 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIILAWRENCEVILLE 03/12/2010 19375.00000 40-18-07.0 N NJ NE 074-44-09.6 W 0004159976 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIILAWRENCEVILLE 03/12/2010 19475.00000 40-18-07.0 N Page 22 MG - Microwave Industrial/Business Pool State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz)
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-297036A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-297036A1.txt
    • 38-36-24.1 N MO MD WQLK222 090-14-26.9 W 0004168802 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIISt Louis 03/15/2010 19675.00000 38-36-24.1 N MO MD WQLK222 090-14-26.9 W 0004168802 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIISt Louis 03/15/2010 21925.00000 38-36-24.1 N MO MD WQLK222 090-14-26.9 W 0004168802 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIISt Louis 03/15/2010 22075.00000 38-36-24.1 N MO MD WQLJ687 090-13-10.4 W 0004168803 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIISaint Louis 03/15/2010 17815.00000 38-39-00.5 N MO MD WQLJ687 090-13-10.4 W 0004168803 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIISaint Louis 03/15/2010 17915.00000 38-39-00.5 N MO MD WQLJ687 090-13-10.4 W 0004168803 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIISaint Louis 03/15/2010 17965.00000 38-39-00.5 N MO MD WQLJ687 090-13-10.4 W 0004168803 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIISaint Louis 03/15/2010 18065.00000 38-39-00.5 N MO MD WQLK214 090-13-53.5 W 0004168804 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIISt Louis 03/15/2010 17815.00000 38-37-55.0
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-297038A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-297038A1.txt
    • LLC Abingdon 03/17/2010 36-44-16.5 N VA MD KNKA257 081-56-54.2 W 0004176397 Alltel Communications, LLC ABINGDON 03/17/2010 36-43-14.9 N TN MD KNKA257 082-20-30.5 W 0004176397 Alltel Communications, LLC Blountville 03/17/2010 36-33-17.4 N TN MD KNKA257 082-11-47.5 W 0004176397 Alltel Communications, LLC BRISTOL 03/17/2010 36-34-50.4 N VA MD KNKA257 082-44-38.3 W 0004176397 Alltel Communications, LLC DUFFIELD 03/17/2010 36-38-30.9 N TN MD KNKA257 082-11-00.5 W 0004176397 Alltel Communications, LLC Elizabethton 03/17/2010 36-18-06.7 N TN MD KNKA257 082-36-57.5 W 0004176397 Alltel Communications, LLC Fall Branch 03/17/2010 36-23-38.4 N VA MD KNKA257 082-32-29.8 W 0004176397 Alltel Communications, LLC Gate City 03/17/2010 36-38-32.1 N VA MD KNKA257 081-43-15.4 W 0004176397 Alltel Communications, LLC Glade Springs 03/17/2010 36-47-19.4 N TN MD KNKA257 082-23-00.0 W 0004176397 Alltel Communications, LLC
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-297205A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-297205A1.txt
    • 37-44-20.0 N CA NE 121-59-42.5 W 0004187163 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIISan Ramon 03/26/2010 11545.00000 37-44-20.0 N CA NE 121-59-42.5 W 0004187163 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIISan Ramon 03/26/2010 11665.00000 37-44-20.0 N CA NE 121-59-42.5 W 0004187163 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIISan Ramon 03/26/2010 18015.00000 37-44-20.0 N CA NE 121-59-42.5 W 0004187163 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIISan Ramon 03/26/2010 18115.00000 37-44-20.0 N CA NE 122-30-00.5 W 0004187165 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIISan Rafael 03/26/2010 19375.00000 37-59-24.8 N Page 45 MG - Microwave Industrial/Business Pool State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City CA NE 122-30-00.5 W 0004187165 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIISan Rafael 03/26/2010 19475.00000 37-59-24.8 N CA NE 122-30-00.5 W 0004187165 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIISan Rafael 03/26/2010
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-297269A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-297269A2.txt
    • 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0100.0 $60 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0100.0 688,664 0.0 0.1 1.6 19.6 78.8 Austria $16,329,911 0.0 0.0 1.1 31.8 67.2 $1,825,474 0.0 0.0 0.0 39.9 60.1 $840,463 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0100.0 205,911,383 0.0 0.0 3.7 38.4 57.9 Belgium $21,202,971 0.0 0.1 1.1 10.2 88.6 $2,150,480 0.0 0.0 0.0 32.4 67.6 $19,473,691 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0100.0 418,020,278 0.0 0.0 0.5 29.5 70.0 Cyprus $1,881,304 0.0 0.0 0.9 12.0 87.0 $104,905 0.0 0.0 0.0 50.9 49.1 $124,472 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0100.0 34,647,850 0.0 0.1 2.4 24.9 72.7 Denmark $11,136,682 0.0 0.0 0.9 26.6 72.5 $614,610 0.0 0.0 0.0 24.9 75.1 $4,535,307 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0100.0 155,622,123 0.0 0.0 1.9 43.8 54.2 Finland $5,603,208 0.0 0.1 1.7 24.5 73.7 $112,233 0.0 0.0
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-297472A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-297472A1.txt
    • 04/08/2010 31-17-59.6 N GS - Private Carrier Paging, 929-930 MHz State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City NY RM WNWB486 073-41-33.5 W 0004202448 USA Mobility Wireless, Inc. BROOKLYN 04/07/2010 00929.36250 40-41-22.4 N NY RM WNWB486 073-59-48.5 W 0004202448 USA Mobility Wireless, Inc. BROOKLYN 04/07/2010 00929.36250 40-41-25.4 N NY RM WNWB486 073-49-00.5 W 0004202448 USA Mobility Wireless, Inc. JAMAICA 04/07/2010 00929.36250 40-42-02.4 N NY RM WNWB486 073-58-46.5 W 0004202448 USA Mobility Wireless, Inc. NEW YORK 04/07/2010 00929.36250 40-48-23.4 N NY RM WNWB486 072-20-54.0 W 0004202448 USA Mobility Wireless, Inc. NOYACK 04/07/2010 00929.36250 40-58-19.0 N RO WPHE963 0004202232 T&K COMMUNICATIONS INC 04/07/2010 IK - Industrial/Business Pool - Commercial, Conventional State Purpose Call Sign
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-297473A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-297473A1.txt
    • N MA NE 070-39-36.4 W 0004203601 MVA.NET, LTD Gloucester 04/08/2010 23020.00000 42-37-25.8 N Page 27 MG - Microwave Industrial/Business Pool State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City MA NE 070-52-00.3 W 0004203604 MVA.NET, LTD BEVERLY 04/08/2010 19325.00000 42-34-31.1 N TX NE 095-31-43.5 W 0004203607 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIISpring 04/08/2010 22025.00000 30-02-00.5 N HI NE 155-51-50.0 W 0004203859 HAWAII ELECTRIC LIGHT CO., INC. HILO 04/08/2010 02452.50000 19-13-36.0 N CA NE 121-56-05.8 W 0004205345 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIICampbell 04/09/2010 10775.00000 37-17-18.7 N CA NE 121-56-05.8 W 0004205345 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIICampbell 04/09/2010 10895.00000 37-17-18.7 N CA NE 121-56-05.8 W 0004205345 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIICampbell 04/09/2010 18015.00000 37-17-18.7 N CA NE 121-56-05.8 W 0004205345
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-297625A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-297625A1.txt
    • HOLDINGS IIICambridge 04/16/2010 23375.00000 42-23-36.2 N MA NE 071-08-23.3 W 0004214866 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIICambridge 04/16/2010 23475.00000 42-23-36.2 N MA NE 071-08-43.8 W 0004214871 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIICambridge 04/16/2010 19625.00000 42-23-22.6 N MA NE 071-08-43.8 W 0004214871 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIICambridge 04/16/2010 22125.00000 42-23-22.6 N MA NE 071-08-43.8 W 0004214871 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIICambridge 04/16/2010 22225.00000 42-23-22.6 N MA NE 071-06-00.5 W 0004214874 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIICambridge 04/16/2010 22125.00000 42-21-43.6 N MA NE 071-06-00.5 W 0004214874 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIICambridge 04/16/2010 22325.00000 42-21-43.6 N MA NE 071-05-59.0 W 0004214878 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIISomerville 04/16/2010 18065.00000 42-23-46.0 N MA NE 071-05-59.0 W 0004214878 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIISomerville 04/16/2010 23225.00000 42-23-46.0 N MA NE 071-02-49.7 W 0004214880 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIBoston 04/16/2010 23025.00000
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-297643A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-297643A1.txt
    • 1 - ALSAT - (ALSAT) 1 - SATMEX 6 - (113 W.L.) 1 - SATMEX-5 - (116.8 W.L.) Page 1 of 5 E100047 SES-LIC-20100405-00402 E Class of Station: Fixed Earth Stations Application for Authority Televicentro of Puerto Rico, LLC Nature of Service: Fixed Satellite Service 18 ° 24 ' 14.10 " N LAT. SITE ID: 1 State Road 19, Km 0.5, Guaynabo, San Juan, PR 66 ° 6 ' 30.20 " W LONG. LOCATION: ASC Signal 4.9 4.9 meters ANTENNA ID: Quad Digital video carrier, QPSK, 3/4 FEC 3700.0000 - 4200.0000 MHz 5M10G7F MPCP Digital video carrier, 3/4 FEC, QPSK 3700.0000 - 4200.0000 MHz 10M2G7F 63.35 dBW Digital video carrier, QPSK, 3/4 FEC 5925.0000 - 6078.3500 MHz 5M10G7F 63.35 dBW Digital
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-297768A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-297768A1.txt
    • HOLDINGS IIISaugus 04/19/2010 22125.00000 42-29-39.8 N MA NE 071-00-43.4 W 0004216336 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIISaugus 04/19/2010 22275.00000 42-29-39.8 N MA NE 070-57-00.7 W 0004216337 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIILynn 04/19/2010 23025.00000 42-28-35.0 N MA NE 070-57-00.7 W 0004216337 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIILynn 04/19/2010 23075.00000 42-28-35.0 N MA NE 070-57-00.7 W 0004216337 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIILynn 04/19/2010 23125.00000 42-28-35.0 N MA NE 071-11-00.5 W 0004216338 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIBurlington 04/19/2010 23025.00000 42-28-59.1 N MA NE 071-11-00.5 W 0004216338 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIBurlington 04/19/2010 23375.00000 42-28-59.1 N Page 39 MG - Microwave Industrial/Business Pool State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City MA NE 071-11-00.5 W 0004216338 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIBurlington 04/19/2010 23475.00000 42-28-59.1 N
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-297769A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-297769A1.txt
    • CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIINorth Providence 04/19/2010 23475.00000 41-52-04.0 N RI NE 071-25-43.6 W 0004216984 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIINorth Providence 04/19/2010 23575.00000 41-52-04.0 N RI NE 071-27-29.6 W 0004216986 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIICranston 04/19/2010 17815.00000 41-46-02.0 N RI NE 071-27-29.6 W 0004216986 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIICranston 04/19/2010 17915.00000 41-46-02.0 N RI NE 071-25-10.7 W 0004216987 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIProvidence 04/19/2010 23475.00000 41-50-00.5 N RI NE 071-25-10.7 W 0004216987 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIProvidence 04/19/2010 23575.00000 41-50-00.5 N RI NE 071-22-22.5 W 0004216988 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIPawtucket 04/19/2010 19375.00000 41-53-24.8 N RI NE 071-22-22.5 W 0004216988 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIPawtucket 04/19/2010 19475.00000 41-53-24.8 N RI NE 071-22-22.5 W 0004216988 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIPawtucket 04/19/2010 23025.00000 41-53-24.8 N RI NE 071-22-22.5 W 0004216988 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-297770A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-297770A1.txt
    • N TX MD WQGT625 099-45-16.6 W 0004220245 Clearwire Spectrum Holdings II, LLC ABILENE 04/21/2010 23325.00000 32-26-56.9 N Page 37 MG - Microwave Industrial/Business Pool State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City TX MD WQGT625 099-45-16.6 W 0004220245 Clearwire Spectrum Holdings II, LLC ABILENE 04/21/2010 23425.00000 32-26-56.9 N TX MD WQLL390 099-44-00.5 W 0004220247 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIAbilene 04/21/2010 21825.00000 32-27-05.3 N TX MD WQLL390 099-44-00.5 W 0004220247 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIAbilene 04/21/2010 21925.00000 32-27-05.3 N TX MD WQLL390 099-44-00.5 W 0004220247 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIAbilene 04/21/2010 21975.00000 32-27-05.3 N TX MD WQLL390 099-44-00.5 W 0004220247 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIAbilene 04/21/2010 22075.00000 32-27-05.3 N TX MD WQLL390 099-44-00.5 W 0004220247 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-297888A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-297888A1.txt
    • W 0004226319 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIINashville 04/27/2010 18015.00000 36-09-10.3 N TN NE 086-47-45.8 W 0004226319 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIINashville 04/27/2010 18115.00000 36-09-10.3 N TN NE 086-47-45.8 W 0004226319 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIINashville 04/27/2010 21825.00000 36-09-10.3 N TN NE 086-47-45.8 W 0004226319 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIINashville 04/27/2010 21975.00000 36-09-10.3 N TN NE 086-41-50.3 W 0004226329 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIINASHVILLE 04/27/2010 21825.00000 36-07-00.5 N TN NE 086-41-50.3 W 0004226329 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIINASHVILLE 04/27/2010 21975.00000 36-07-00.5 N TN NE 086-47-48.2 W 0004226333 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIINashville 04/27/2010 17965.00000 36-06-14.8 N Page 50 MG - Microwave Industrial/Business Pool State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City TN NE 086-47-48.2 W 0004226333 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIINashville
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-297892A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-297892A1.txt
    • (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City NC NE 077-57-29.8 W 0004225855 Wayne, County of FREMONT 04/27/2010 06755.62500 35-33-09.8 N CA NE 119-40-01.9 W 0004225856 MADERA, COUNTY OF MADERA 04/27/2010 11365.00000 37-20-27.8 N CA NE 120-03-51.0 W 0004225858 MADERA, COUNTY OF MOUNT BULLION 04/27/2010 06541.25000 37-32-20.0 N CA NE 120-15-32.0 W 0004225859 MADERA, COUNTY OF Chowchilla 04/27/2010 06246.66000 37-07-22.0 N ID NE 112-28-00.5 W 0004225944 Bannock County Pocatello 04/27/2010 23285.00000 42-52-15.2 N ID NE 112-35-25.8 W 0004225968 Bannock County Pocatello 04/27/2010 22735.00000 42-54-16.6 N ID NE 112-29-12.5 W 0004225978 Bannock County Pocatello 04/27/2010 21535.00000 42-48-30.0 N ID NE 112-21-55.9 W 0004226360 Bannock, County of Pocatello 04/27/2010 21985.00000 42-47-16.3 N FL NE 081-49-39.8 W 0004226420 Hardee County-IDA Bowling Green 04/28/2010 11225.00000 27-38-22.1 N FL
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-298385A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-298385A1.txt
    • W3 1 Page 4 Frequency Termination Pending Call Sign Termination Date Stn Class Licensee Name Lower/Upper Frequency City Latitude State Longitude Loc./ Path ## Ant. MG - Microwave Industrial/Business Pool Broadband Division 04/20/2010 WQJE916 FXO CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS II LLC 19475.00000000 Las Vegas 36-7-46.0 N NV 115-11-36.1 W3 1 04/20/2010 WQJL206 FXO CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS II LLC 17965.00000000 Las Vegas 36-5-0.5 N NV 115-11-10.1 W1 1 04/20/2010 WQJL206 FXO CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS II LLC 18065.00000000 Las Vegas 36-5-0.5 N NV 115-11-10.1 W1 1 04/20/2010 WQJL206 FXO CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS II LLC 17815.00000000 Las Vegas 36-5-0.5 N NV 115-11-10.1 W2 1 04/20/2010 WQJL206 FXO CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS II LLC 17915.00000000 Las Vegas 36-5-0.5 N NV 115-11-10.1 W2 1 04/20/2010 WQJL206 FXO CLEARWIRE
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-298388A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-298388A1.txt
    • 0004248331 GTE Mobilnet of South Texas Limited PartLA PORTE 05/14/2010 06256.54000 29-39-43.8 N TX NE 095-06-25.5 W 0004248480 GTE Mobilnet of South Texas Limited PartHouston 05/14/2010 06315.84000 29-34-20.7 N WA NE 122-30-17.5 W 0004248681 Seattle SMSA Limited Partnership Vashon Island 05/17/2010 10915.00000 47-20-38.3 N WA NE 122-30-46.4 W 0004248682 Seattle SMSA Limited Partnership TACOMA 05/17/2010 11405.00000 47-16-43.4 N WA NE 122-26-00.5 W 0004248683 Seattle SMSA Limited Partnership Vashon Island 05/17/2010 11155.00000 47-22-14.6 N WA NE 122-28-08.0 W 0004248684 Seattle SMSA Limited Partnership VASHON ISLAND 05/17/2010 11645.00000 47-26-08.0 N TX NE 096-26-25.3 W 0004248744 Conterra Ultra Broadband, LLC Lavon 05/17/2010 19495.00000 33-00-59.2 N TX NE 099-57-39.8 W 0004249541 Conterra Ultra Broadband, LLC Ballinger 05/17/2010 21820.00000 31-45-01.6 N TX NE 099-57-08.3 W 0004249549
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-298389A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-298389A1.txt
    • 106-33-22.1 W 0004251364 Verizon Wireless (VAW) LLC BERNALILLO 05/18/2010 10562.50000 35-17-42.1 N NM RM WPNG322 106-33-22.1 W 0004251364 Verizon Wireless (VAW) LLC BERNALILLO 05/18/2010 10835.00000 35-17-42.1 N NM RM WPNG322 106-33-22.1 W 0004251364 Verizon Wireless (VAW) LLC BERNALILLO 05/18/2010 18705.00000 35-17-42.1 N NM RM WPNG322 106-33-22.1 W 0004251364 Verizon Wireless (VAW) LLC BERNALILLO 05/18/2010 18755.00000 35-17-42.1 N AZ RM WLA770 112-01-00.5 W 0004251394 Verizon Wireless (VAW) LLC PHOENIX 05/18/2010 06197.24000 33-27-13.1 N AZ RM WLA770 112-01-00.5 W 0004251394 Verizon Wireless (VAW) LLC PHOENIX 05/18/2010 06286.19000 33-27-13.1 N AZ RM WLA770 112-01-00.5 W 0004251394 Verizon Wireless (VAW) LLC PHOENIX 05/18/2010 17800.00000 33-27-13.1 N Page 4 CF - Common Carrier Fixed Point to Point Microwave State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-298411A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-298411A1.txt
    • US Inc. Inmarsat Hawaii Inc. Application for Consent to Assignment ISAT US Inc. E100047 SES-LIC-20100405-00402 E Date Effective: 05/24/2010 Class of Station: Fixed Earth Stations Grant of Authority 05/24/2010 - 05/24/2025 Application for Authority Televicentro of Puerto Rico, LLC Nature of Service: Fixed Satellite Service 18 ° 24 ' 14.10 " N LAT. SITE ID: 1 State Road 19, Km 0.5, Guaynabo, San Juan, PR 66 ° 6 ' 30.20 " W LONG. LOCATION: ASC Signal 4.9 4.9 meters ANTENNA ID: Quad Digital video carrier, QPSK, 3/4 FEC 3700.0000 - 4200.0000 MHz 5M10G7F MPCP Digital video carrier, 3/4 FEC, QPSK 3700.0000 - 4200.0000 MHz 10M2G7F 63.35 dBW Digital video carrier, QPSK, 3/4 FEC 5925.0000 - 6078.3500 MHz 5M10G7F 63.35 dBW Digital
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-298546A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-298546A1.txt
    • HOLDINGS IIIOverland Park 05/24/2010 23075.00000 38-55-08.0 N KS NE 094-39-29.9 W 0004257401 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIOverland Park 05/24/2010 23225.00000 38-55-08.0 N KS NE 094-40-07.8 W 0004257404 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIOverland Park 05/24/2010 21825.00000 38-55-34.5 N KS NE 094-40-07.8 W 0004257404 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIOverland Park 05/24/2010 21975.00000 38-55-34.5 N OR NE 121-46-52.1 W 0004257876 UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD CHEMULT 05/24/2010 06795.00000 43-13-00.5 N OR NE 123-03-37.8 W 0004258031 Freewire Broadband LLC EUGENE 05/24/2010 18000.00000 44-05-30.0 N OR NE 123-06-52.0 W 0004258042 Freewire Broadband LLC EUGENE 05/24/2010 17760.00000 44-00-10.0 N OR NE 123-02-19.5 W 0004258046 Freewire Broadband LLC EUGENE 05/24/2010 19320.00000 44-06-58.2 N OR NE 123-02-19.5 W 0004258046 Freewire Broadband LLC EUGENE 05/24/2010 19560.00000 44-06-58.2 N OR NE 123-01-43.0 W 0004258088 UNION PACIFIC
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-298678A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-298678A1.txt
    • N CA MD WQLN614 117-55-13.4 W 0004267912 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIICovina 06/02/2010 19575.00000 34-05-26.0 N CA MD WQLN614 117-55-13.4 W 0004267912 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIICovina 06/02/2010 19675.00000 34-05-26.0 N CA MD WQLN614 117-55-13.4 W 0004267912 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIICovina 06/02/2010 23025.00000 34-05-26.0 N CA MD WQLN614 117-55-13.4 W 0004267912 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIICovina 06/02/2010 23175.00000 34-05-26.0 N CA MD WQLU932 118-21-00.5 W 0004267915 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIInglewood 06/02/2010 19525.00000 33-57-35.6 N CA MD WQLU932 118-21-00.5 W 0004267915 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIInglewood 06/02/2010 19625.00000 33-57-35.6 N CA MD WQLU932 118-21-00.5 W 0004267915 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIInglewood 06/02/2010 23025.00000 33-57-35.6 N CA MD WQLU932 118-21-00.5 W 0004267915 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIInglewood 06/02/2010 23075.00000 33-57-35.6 N CA MD WQLU932 118-21-00.5 W 0004267915 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-298839A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-298839A1.txt
    • N CA MD WQLN660 118-31-25.3 W 0004275619 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIINorthridge 06/09/2010 17815.00000 34-15-13.2 N CA MD WQLN660 118-31-25.3 W 0004275619 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIINorthridge 06/09/2010 17915.00000 34-15-13.2 N CA MD WQLN660 118-31-25.3 W 0004275619 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIINorthridge 06/09/2010 19525.00000 34-15-13.2 N CA MD WQLN660 118-31-25.3 W 0004275619 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIINorthridge 06/09/2010 19625.00000 34-15-13.2 N TX MD WQKH408 096-51-00.5 W 0004275626 AirCanopy Internet Services Waxahachie 06/09/2010 11265.00000 32-26-23.9 N TX MD WQLA415 096-55-48.2 W 0004275627 AirCanopy Internet Services Waxahachie 06/09/2010 10775.00000 32-20-47.1 N TX MD WQLA415 096-55-48.2 W 0004275627 AirCanopy Internet Services Waxahachie 06/09/2010 11225.00000 32-20-47.1 N TX MD WQKF471 096-58-34.6 W 0004275628 AirCanopy Internet Services MIDLOTHIAN 06/09/2010 19375.00000 32-30-46.4 N TX MD WQGK216 097-01-30.0 W 0004275629 AirCanopy Internet
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-298933A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-298933A1.txt
    • WIRELESS PCS, LLCLIND 06/16/2010 46-47-35.2 N WA MD KNKA817 119-09-51.3 W 0004285341 NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS PCS, LLCMESA 06/16/2010 46-33-31.6 N WA MD KNKA817 118-46-57.7 W 0004285341 NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS PCS, LLCOTHELLO 06/16/2010 46-46-43.3 N WA MD KNKA817 119-00-50.4 W 0004285341 NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS PCS, LLCPasco 06/16/2010 46-25-50.2 N WA MD KNKA817 119-19-09.6 W 0004285341 NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS PCS, LLCRICHLAND 06/16/2010 46-14-00.5 N WA MD KNKA817 119-34-16.5 W 0004285341 NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS PCS, LLCRICHLAND 06/16/2010 46-33-01.5 N WA MD KNKA817 120-03-48.1 W 0004285341 NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS PCS, LLCSUNNYSIDE 06/16/2010 46-18-28.0 N AK MD KNKN407 148-56-24.0 W 0004286019 Dobson Cellular Systems of Alaska, LLCCANTWELL 06/17/2010 63-24-02.0 N AK MD KNKN407 149-05-22.0 W 0004286019 Dobson Cellular Systems of Alaska, LLCCLEAR 06/17/2010 64-17-49.9 N Page
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-298934A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-298934A1.txt
    • IIIJacksonville 06/17/2010 10855.00000 30-15-03.6 N FL AM 081-27-57.2 W 0004252245 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIJacksonville 06/17/2010 10935.00000 30-15-03.6 N FL AM 081-27-57.2 W 0004252245 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIJacksonville 06/17/2010 10975.00000 30-15-03.6 N FL AM 081-27-57.2 W 0004252245 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIJacksonville 06/17/2010 11055.00000 30-15-03.6 N FL AM 081-27-57.2 W 0004252245 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIJacksonville 06/17/2010 17815.00000 30-15-03.6 N TX AM WQKH408 096-51-00.5 W 0004275626 AirCanopy Internet Services Waxahachie 06/17/2010 11265.00000 32-26-23.9 N TX AM WQKH408 096-51-00.5 W 0004275626 AirCanopy Internet Services Waxahachie 06/17/2010 23025.00000 32-26-23.9 N TX AM WQGK216 097-01-30.0 W 0004275629 AirCanopy Internet Services Midlothian 06/17/2010 06123.10000 32-26-11.0 N TX AM WQGK216 097-01-30.0 W 0004275629 AirCanopy Internet Services Midlothian 06/17/2010 17915.00000 32-26-11.0 N TX AM WQGK216 097-01-30.0 W 0004275629 AirCanopy Internet
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-299557A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-299557A1.txt
    • State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City KS MD KNKN637 095-48-37.2 W 0004300910 New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC HOLTON 06/28/2010 39-27-45.0 N KS MD KNKN637 095-33-46.0 W 0004300910 New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC Horton 06/28/2010 39-45-08.0 N KS MD KNKN637 094-53-15.3 W 0004300910 New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC Lansing 06/28/2010 39-14-00.5 N KS MD KNKN637 094-56-15.9 W 0004300910 New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC LEAVENWORTH 06/28/2010 39-17-52.0 N KS MD KNKN637 095-43-16.8 W 0004300910 New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC Mayetta 06/28/2010 39-18-42.9 N MO MD KNKN637 095-02-18.9 W 0004300910 New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC RUSHVILLE 06/28/2010 39-33-12.0 N KS MD KNKN637 095-44-21.2 W 0004300910 New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC Sabetha 06/28/2010 39-39-41.2
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-299558A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-299558A1.txt
    • 071-03-16.0 W 0004301089 FiberTower Network Services Corp. DORCHESTER 06/29/2010 19620.00000 42-18-29.0 N MA MD WQCI888 071-03-16.0 W 0004301089 FiberTower Network Services Corp. DORCHESTER 06/29/2010 19680.00000 42-18-29.0 N MA MD WQCI888 071-03-16.0 W 0004301089 FiberTower Network Services Corp. DORCHESTER 06/29/2010 23125.00000 42-18-29.0 N MA MD WQCI888 071-03-16.0 W 0004301089 FiberTower Network Services Corp. DORCHESTER 06/29/2010 23320.00000 42-18-29.0 N CA MD WPXG729 116-57-00.5 W 0004302164 Los Angeles SMSA Limited Partnership HEMET 06/29/2010 10592.50000 33-43-16.0 N CA MD WPXG729 116-57-00.5 W 0004302164 Los Angeles SMSA Limited Partnership HEMET 06/29/2010 11245.00000 33-43-16.0 N TX MD WQKC634 096-45-20.4 W 0004302275 NEXTLINK WIRELESS INC. RICHARDSON 06/29/2010 19625.00000 32-59-05.1 N TX MD WQIY218 096-48-51.0 W 0004302279 Nextlink Wireless, Inc. Dallas 06/29/2010 11525.00000 32-56-06.0 N TX MD WQIY218 096-48-51.0
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-299559A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-299559A1.txt
    • O NEALS 07/02/2010 06615.00000 37-07-39.8 N CA MD WNEV956 119-40-41.5 W 0004307859 Pacific Gas and Electric Company O NEALS 07/02/2010 06635.00000 37-07-39.8 N CA MD WNEV956 119-40-41.5 W 0004307859 Pacific Gas and Electric Company O NEALS 07/02/2010 06675.00000 37-07-39.8 N CA MD WNEV956 119-40-41.5 W 0004307859 Pacific Gas and Electric Company O NEALS 07/02/2010 06685.00000 37-07-39.8 N CA MD KMJ72 119-46-00.5 W 0004307860 Pacific Gas and Electric Company FRESNO 07/02/2010 06315.84000 36-43-09.8 N CA MD WHC232 119-55-00.5 W 0004307861 Pacific Gas and Electric Company MADERA 07/02/2010 06775.00000 36-51-15.8 N CA MD WHC232 119-55-00.5 W 0004307861 Pacific Gas and Electric Company MADERA 07/02/2010 06845.00000 36-51-15.8 N ID MD WQKL319 114-27-42.8 W 0004307960 ONE WAVE NETWORKS TWIN FALLS 07/02/2010 17880.00000 42-34-57.7 N ID
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-299965A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-299965A1.txt
    • 02467.00000 - 02483.50000 39-47-35.1 N TS - TV Studio Transmitter Link State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City TX MD WPNB690 097-03-04.3 W 0004325445 COMCORP OF BRYAN LICENSE CORP.LOTT 07/16/2010 07000.00000 - 07025.00000 31-12-11.3 N TX MD WPNB689 097-13-08.5 W 0004325447 COMCORP OF BRYAN LICENSE CORP.WACO 07/16/2010 06950.00000 - 06975.00000 31-30-00.5 N TX MD WPNB688 096-35-06.5 W 0004325448 COMCORP OF BRYAN LICENSE CORP.HEARNE 07/16/2010 07100.00000 - 07125.00000 30-56-23.4 N Page 55
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-299967A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-299967A1.txt
    • 42-11-53.5 N OR RM WRP313 122-45-04.1 W 0004323272 ACTION OF MEDFORD INC MEDFORD 07/14/2010 00461.07500 42-17-42.5 N OR RM WRP313 122-45-04.1 W 0004323272 ACTION OF MEDFORD INC MEDFORD 07/14/2010 00461.52500 42-17-42.5 N OR RM WRP313 122-45-04.1 W 0004323272 ACTION OF MEDFORD INC MEDFORD 07/14/2010 00461.92500 42-17-42.5 N OR RM WRP313 122-52-48.1 W 0004323272 ACTION OF MEDFORD INC MEDFORD 07/14/2010 00461.07500 42-20-00.5 N OR RM WRP313 122-52-48.1 W 0004323272 ACTION OF MEDFORD INC MEDFORD 07/14/2010 00461.52500 42-20-00.5 N OR RM WRP313 122-52-48.1 W 0004323272 ACTION OF MEDFORD INC MEDFORD 07/14/2010 00461.92500 42-20-00.5 N OR RM WRP313 123-14-58.2 W 0004323272 ACTION OF MEDFORD INC WIMER 07/14/2010 00461.07500 42-32-22.4 N OR RM WRP313 123-14-58.2 W 0004323272 ACTION OF MEDFORD INC WIMER 07/14/2010 00461.52500 42-32-22.4
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-299968A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-299968A1.txt
    • MIDDLETOWN 07/14/2010 06795.00000 38-40-05.4 N CA MD KNI82 122-38-02.0 W 0004322255 CALIFORNIA, STATE OF MIDDLETOWN 07/14/2010 06805.00000 38-40-05.4 N CA MD KNI82 122-38-02.0 W 0004322255 CALIFORNIA, STATE OF MIDDLETOWN 07/14/2010 06845.00000 38-40-05.4 N CA MD KNI82 122-38-02.0 W 0004322255 CALIFORNIA, STATE OF MIDDLETOWN 07/14/2010 10632.50000 38-40-05.4 N CA MD KNI81 122-43-29.1 W 0004322256 CALIFORNIA, STATE OF SANTA ROSA 07/14/2010 06625.00000 38-27-00.5 N CA MD KMV62 122-37-17.9 W 0004322257 CALIFORNIA, STATE OF PETALUMA 07/14/2010 02183.20000 38-14-11.7 N CA MD KMV62 122-37-17.9 W 0004322257 CALIFORNIA, STATE OF PETALUMA 07/14/2010 06645.00000 38-14-11.7 N CA MD KMV63 122-17-57.9 W 0004322258 CALIFORNIA, STATE OF NAPA 07/14/2010 06665.00000 38-19-03.7 N Page 2 MW - Microwave Public Safety Pool State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-300379A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-300379A1.txt
    • Applicant Name Latitude City OH MD WPWR694 084-27-21.8 W 0004328650 SUSQUEHANNA RADIO CORP. Cincinnati 07/19/2010 00945.00000 39-09-58.2 N Page 1 AS - Aural Studio Transmitter Link State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City OH MD WHS576 084-27-21.8 W 0004328653 CUMULUS LICENSING LLC Cincinnati 07/19/2010 00948.00000 39-09-58.2 N TX MD WBK258 101-51-00.5 W 0004331574 WILKS LICENSE COMPANY-LUBBOCK LLUBBOCK 07/21/2010 00946.00000 33-32-32.3 N TX MD WLG329 101-51-00.5 W 0004331576 WILKS LICENSE COMPANY-LUBBOCK LLUBBOCK 07/21/2010 00949.00000 33-32-32.3 N TX MD WPZB995 101-52-42.0 W 0004331578 WILKS LICENSE COMPANY-LUBBOCK LLUBBUCK 07/21/2010 00944.50000 33-26-31.0 N TX MD WPNF633 101-51-00.5 W 0004331579 WILKS LICENSE COMPANY-LUBBOCK LLUBBOCK 07/21/2010 00950.50000 33-32-32.3 N SC MD WPNB278 078-52-43.1 W 0004333967 CUMULUS LICENSING
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-300669A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-300669A1.txt
    • PCS, LLCEL DORADO 07/27/2010 33-11-59.1 N AR MD KNKN544 093-11-24.5 W 0004336965 NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS PCS, LLCEmerson 07/27/2010 33-06-42.7 N AR MD KNKN544 091-16-32.9 W 0004336965 NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS PCS, LLCEudora 07/27/2010 33-06-43.7 N AR MD KNKN544 091-33-41.8 W 0004336965 NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS PCS, LLCGould 07/27/2010 33-58-49.4 N AR MD KNKN544 091-42-16.1 W 0004336965 NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS PCS, LLCGRADY 07/27/2010 34-05-00.5 N AR MD KNKN544 093-12-19.7 W 0004336965 NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS PCS, LLCGurdon 07/27/2010 33-58-17.0 N AR MD KNKN544 091-45-41.8 W 0004336965 NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS PCS, LLCHAMBURG 07/27/2010 33-14-14.5 N LA MD KNKN544 093-04-20.2 W 0004336965 NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS PCS, LLCHOMER 07/27/2010 32-52-39.8 N AR MD KNKN544 091-20-08.6 W 0004336965 NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS PCS, LLCLake Village 07/27/2010 33-27-50.5 N AR MD
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-300671A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-300671A1.txt
    • NE 089-21-53.0 W 0004338676 Open Range Communications MORRISONVILLE 07/29/2010 06286.19000 39-22-42.0 N IL NE 089-42-03.0 W 0004338680 Open Range Communications Chatham 07/29/2010 11215.00000 39-40-41.9 N Page 49 MG - Microwave Industrial/Business Pool State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City IL NE 088-33-05.2 W 0004338684 Open Range Communications Effingham 07/29/2010 21830.00000 39-06-00.5 N IL NE 088-32-45.3 W 0004338688 Open Range Communications EFFINGHAM 07/29/2010 23030.00000 39-07-15.3 N TX NE 096-09-36.6 W 0004338703 Rayburn Country Electric Cooperative IncTerrell 07/29/2010 06755.00000 32-49-01.2 N TX NE 096-09-36.6 W 0004338703 Rayburn Country Electric Cooperative IncTerrell 07/29/2010 06775.00000 32-49-01.2 N MN NE 094-55-53.0 W 0004338781 HARVEST LAND COOPERATIVE MORGAN 07/29/2010 11095.00000 44-25-00.5 N MN NE 094-55-00.5 W 0004338784
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-300673A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-300673A1.txt
    • Winnebago County Illinois Rockford 07/28/2010 21825.00000 42-16-17.8 N IL NE 089-04-28.1 W 0004337735 Winnebago County Illinois Rockford 07/28/2010 17765.00000 42-19-29.5 N IL NE 089-04-28.1 W 0004337735 Winnebago County Illinois Rockford 07/28/2010 17865.00000 42-19-29.5 N IL NE 089-05-34.1 W 0004337770 Winnegago County Illinois Rockford 07/28/2010 23025.00000 42-15-46.8 N MO NE 094-34-28.6 W 0004337820 Kansas City, City of Kansas City 07/28/2010 10955.00000 39-02-00.5 N MO NE 094-34-40.6 W 0004337821 Kansas City, City of Kansas City 07/28/2010 06093.45000 39-06-02.2 N MO NE 094-34-40.6 W 0004337821 Kansas City, City of Kansas City 07/28/2010 06152.75000 39-06-02.2 N MO NE 094-30-19.3 W 0004337822 Kansas City, City of Kansas City 07/28/2010 10715.00000 39-01-54.5 N MO NE 094-31-57.5 W 0004337825 Kansas City, City of Kansas City 07/28/2010 10715.00000 38-57-02.9
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-300783A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-300783A1.txt
    • 11/12 LIMITED PARTNETaos 08/02/2010 38-30-58.3 N MO MD KNKN726 092-47-02.8 W 0004341449 MISSOURI RSA 11/12 LIMITED PARTNETIPTON 08/02/2010 38-39-35.5 N FL MD KNKA524 085-23-26.1 W 0004341878 Alltel Communications, LLC Mexico Beach 08/02/2010 29-56-36.7 N FL MD KNKA524 085-44-55.2 W 0004341878 Alltel Communications, LLC PANAMA CITY 08/02/2010 30-09-33.2 N FL MD KNKA524 085-46-33.0 W 0004341878 Alltel Communications, LLC PANAMA CITY 08/02/2010 30-11-00.5 N FL MD KNKA524 085-36-23.5 W 0004341878 Alltel Communications, LLC Parker 08/02/2010 30-04-51.9 N FL MD KNKA524 085-56-25.4 W 0004341878 Alltel Communications, LLC SUNNYSIDE 08/02/2010 30-15-17.7 N FL MD KNKA524 085-51-29.2 W 0004341878 Alltel Communications, LLC WEST BAY 08/02/2010 30-19-14.9 N WA MD KNKN210 124-22-22.4 W 0004341880 NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS PCS, LLCBEAVER 08/02/2010 48-03-42.1 N WA MD KNKN210 122-21-11.3 W
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-300784A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-300784A1.txt
    • SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIILos Altos Hills 08/04/2010 21875.00000 37-22-56.9 N CA MD WQLY542 122-08-45.9 W 0004344118 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIILos Altos Hills 08/04/2010 21925.00000 37-22-56.9 N CA MD WQLY542 122-08-45.9 W 0004344118 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIILos Altos Hills 08/04/2010 22025.00000 37-22-56.9 N CA MD WQLY542 122-08-45.9 W 0004344118 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIILos Altos Hills 08/04/2010 22075.00000 37-22-56.9 N OR MD WQJJ363 122-55-00.5 W 0004344549 Freewire Broadband LLC Hillsboro 08/04/2010 11285.00000 45-36-47.1 N Page 21 MG - Microwave Industrial/Business Pool State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City OR MD WQJJ363 122-55-00.5 W 0004344549 Freewire Broadband LLC Hillsboro 08/04/2010 19325.00000 45-36-47.1 N OR MD WQJJ363 122-55-00.5 W 0004344549 Freewire Broadband LLC Hillsboro 08/04/2010 19425.00000
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-300946A7.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-300946A7.txt
    • Collinsville Police Department Collinsville -- No No City of Collinsville Primary Owasso Police Department Owasso -- Yes No City of Owasso Primary Broken Arrow Police Department Broken Arrow -- Yes No City of Broken Arrow and portion of Wagoner County Primary Bixby Police Department Bixby -- Yes No City of Bixby Primary Tulsa Sand Springs Police Department Sand Springs -- 0.5 No City of Sand Springs Primary E9-1-1 ASSESSMENT AND STRATEGIC PLAN FOR THE STATE OF OKLAHOMA © 2007 Intrado Inc. All rights reserved. Page 82 Oklahoma Wireless E9-1-1 Level of Service County Agency Location Phase 0 Phase I Phase II Boundaries Primary/ Secondary Jenks Police Department Jenks -- Yes No City of Jenks Primary Glenpool Police Department Glenpool -- Yes
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-300963A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-300963A1.txt
    • NE 089-20-50.5 W 0004352614 State of Mississippi Wireless CommunicatLake 08/13/2010 06152.75000 32-18-04.4 N CA NE 120-57-10.8 W 0004352620 YUBA BEAR RIVER PROJECT OF NID Grass Valley 08/13/2010 02133.20000 39-08-28.6 N CA NE 120-52-50.8 W 0004352621 YUBA BEAR RIVER PROJECT OF NID Nevada City 08/13/2010 02183.20000 39-11-12.6 N MS NE 090-23-16.7 W 0004352729 State of Mississippi Wireless CommunicatYazoo City 08/13/2010 06541.25000 32-50-00.5 N MS NE 090-23-16.7 W 0004352729 State of Mississippi Wireless CommunicatYazoo City 08/13/2010 06625.62500 32-50-00.5 N MS NE 089-54-32.0 W 0004352730 State of Mississippi Wireless CommunicatSharon 08/13/2010 06256.54000 32-40-37.7 N MS NE 089-54-32.0 W 0004352730 State of Mississippi Wireless CommunicatSharon 08/13/2010 06286.19000 32-40-37.7 N MS NE 089-54-32.0 W 0004352730 State of Mississippi Wireless CommunicatSharon 08/13/2010 06315.84000 32-40-37.7 N MS NE
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-301113A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-301113A1.txt
    • 0004353469 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIWETHERSFIELD 08/16/2010 21875.00000 41-42-21.0 N CT NE 072-39-48.3 W 0004353469 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIWETHERSFIELD 08/16/2010 22025.00000 41-42-21.0 N CT NE 072-54-23.3 W 0004353470 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIBristol 08/16/2010 10815.00000 41-42-50.9 N CT NE 072-54-23.3 W 0004353470 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIBristol 08/16/2010 10935.00000 41-42-50.9 N CT NE 072-36-57.2 W 0004353471 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIISOUTH WINDSOR 08/16/2010 21825.00000 41-48-00.5 N Page 31 MG - Microwave Industrial/Business Pool State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City CT NE 072-36-57.2 W 0004353471 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIISOUTH WINDSOR 08/16/2010 21925.00000 41-48-00.5 N CT NE 072-29-36.2 W 0004353472 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIVernon 08/16/2010 10775.00000 41-49-36.8 N CT NE 072-29-36.2 W 0004353472 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-301115A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-301115A1.txt
    • PCS, LLCBinghamton 08/20/2010 42-06-49.0 N NY MD KNKA486 076-22-01.3 W 0004360534 NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS PCS, LLCCANDOR 08/20/2010 42-14-54.5 N NY MD KNKA486 075-53-27.7 W 0004360534 NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS PCS, LLCCHENANGO BRIDG 08/20/2010 42-10-15.3 N PA MD KNKA486 075-38-41.5 W 0004360534 NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS PCS, LLCCLIFFORD 08/20/2010 41-38-36.5 N NY MD KNKA486 075-26-59.3 W 0004360534 NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS PCS, LLCDeposit 08/20/2010 42-02-00.5 N NY MD KNKA486 075-24-24.6 W 0004360534 NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS PCS, LLCDEPOSIT 08/20/2010 42-02-31.3 N PA MD KNKA486 075-46-44.7 W 0004360534 NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS PCS, LLCHALLSTEAD 08/20/2010 41-57-20.3 N PA MD KNKA486 075-40-50.6 W 0004360534 NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS PCS, LLCHARFORD 08/20/2010 41-46-06.7 N PA MD KNKA486 075-39-15.3 W 0004360534 NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS PCS, LLCLENOXVILLE 08/20/2010 41-41-59.1 N NY MD KNKA486
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-301228A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-301228A1.txt
    • SANFORD 08/26/2010 28-47-47.0 N FL AM KNKA253 081-18-16.4 W 0004277286 Orlando SMSA Limited Partnership SANFORD 08/26/2010 28-48-55.7 N FL AM KNKA253 081-15-45.2 W 0004277286 Orlando SMSA Limited Partnership St. Cloud 08/26/2010 28-09-54.1 N FL AM KNKA253 081-38-01.3 W 0004277286 Orlando SMSA Limited Partnership WINTER GARDEN 08/26/2010 28-29-04.8 N CA MD KNKA540 122-17-58.0 W 0004361538 NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS PCS, LLCAnderson 08/23/2010 40-26-00.5 N CA MD KNKA540 121-49-45.0 W 0004361538 NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS PCS, LLCBURNEY 08/23/2010 40-54-21.6 N CA MD KNKA540 122-26-41.5 W 0004361538 NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS PCS, LLCLakehead 08/23/2010 40-54-52.1 N CA MD KNKA540 121-46-20.4 W 0004361538 NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS PCS, LLCMONTGOMERY CR 08/23/2010 40-52-27.9 N Page 17 CL - Cellular State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-301230A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-301230A1.txt
    • W 0004364613 Open Range Communications Pana 08/25/2010 06004.50000 39-23-27.8 N IL NE 089-21-53.0 W 0004364614 Open Range Communications MORRISONVILLE 08/25/2010 06256.54000 39-22-42.0 N IL NE 089-21-53.0 W 0004364614 Open Range Communications MORRISONVILLE 08/25/2010 06286.19000 39-22-42.0 N IL NE 089-42-03.0 W 0004364615 Open Range Communications Chatham 08/25/2010 11215.00000 39-40-41.9 N IL NE 088-33-05.2 W 0004364616 Open Range Communications Effingham 08/25/2010 21830.00000 39-06-00.5 N IL NE 088-32-45.3 W 0004364617 Open Range Communications EFFINGHAM 08/25/2010 23030.00000 39-07-15.3 N FL NE 080-09-21.9 W 0004364619 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIOakland Park 08/25/2010 17965.00000 26-10-12.1 N FL NE 080-09-21.9 W 0004364619 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIOakland Park 08/25/2010 18015.00000 26-10-12.1 N Page 42 MG - Microwave Industrial/Business Pool State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-301232A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-301232A1.txt
    • W 0004367500 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIILauderhill 08/26/2010 22775.00000 26-09-53.2 N FL NE 080-07-01.5 W 0004367502 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIBoca Raton 08/26/2010 10735.00000 26-20-40.2 N Page 26 MG - Microwave Industrial/Business Pool State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City FL NE 080-10-39.4 W 0004367504 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIICoconut Creek 08/26/2010 22625.00000 26-19-00.5 N FL NE 080-07-14.7 W 0004367505 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIPompano Beach 08/26/2010 21275.00000 26-16-36.7 N FL NE 080-04-45.7 W 0004367507 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIDeerfield Beach 08/26/2010 17865.00000 26-18-31.5 N FL NE 080-04-45.7 W 0004367507 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIDeerfield Beach 08/26/2010 18065.00000 26-18-31.5 N FL NE 080-04-45.7 W 0004367507 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIDeerfield Beach 08/26/2010 22575.00000 26-18-31.5 N FL NE 080-04-05.3
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-301294A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-301294A1.txt
    • 7.3 22.0 28.1 28.3 3.0 0.7 0.0 89.3 100.0 sDSL 0.0 0.0 0.0 55.2 38.5 3.6 2.2 * * 0.0 100.0 100.0 Other Wireline 0.0 0.0 0.0 15.2 43.0 16.8 2.8 21.8 0.4 0.0 100.0 100.0 Cable Modem 0.4 1.6 2.0 0.3 3.4 4.5 11.8 54.1 * * 98.0 100.0 FTTP 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.6 1.0 1.9 15.5 1.1 79.3 0.5 99.9 100.0 Satellite 49.7 38.9 88.7 * * * * 0.0 0.0 0.0 11.3 100.0 Fixed Wireless 9.9 4.4 14.3 19.7 24.1 27.4 11.7 1.1 1.6 0.1 85.7 100.0 Mobile Wireless 25.7 9.8 35.5 21.5 36.0 6.0 0.9 * 0.0 * 64.5 100.0 Power Line and Other 0.0 0.0 0.0 * * * * 0.0 * * 100.0 100.0 Total
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-301340A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-301340A1.txt
    • 0004300910 New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC HOLTON 08/30/2010 39-27-45.0 N Page 15 CL - Cellular State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City KS AM KNKN637 095-33-46.0 W 0004300910 New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC Horton 08/30/2010 39-45-08.0 N KS AM KNKN637 094-53-15.3 W 0004300910 New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC Lansing 08/30/2010 39-14-00.5 N KS AM KNKN637 094-56-15.9 W 0004300910 New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC LEAVENWORTH 08/30/2010 39-17-52.0 N KS AM KNKN637 095-43-16.8 W 0004300910 New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC Mayetta 08/30/2010 39-18-42.9 N MO AM KNKN637 095-02-18.9 W 0004300910 New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC RUSHVILLE 08/30/2010 39-33-12.0 N KS AM KNKN637 095-44-21.2 W 0004300910 New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC Sabetha 08/30/2010 39-39-41.2
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-301341A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-301341A1.txt
    • KNKN544 091-16-32.9 W 0004336965 NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS PCS, LLCEudora 09/03/2010 33-06-43.7 N Page 19 CL - Cellular State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City AR AM KNKN544 091-33-41.8 W 0004336965 NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS PCS, LLCGould 09/03/2010 33-58-49.4 N AR AM KNKN544 091-42-16.1 W 0004336965 NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS PCS, LLCGRADY 09/03/2010 34-05-00.5 N AR AM KNKN544 093-12-19.7 W 0004336965 NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS PCS, LLCGurdon 09/03/2010 33-58-17.0 N AR AM KNKN544 091-45-41.8 W 0004336965 NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS PCS, LLCHAMBURG 09/03/2010 33-14-14.5 N LA AM KNKN544 093-04-20.2 W 0004336965 NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS PCS, LLCHOMER 09/03/2010 32-52-39.8 N AR AM KNKN544 091-20-08.6 W 0004336965 NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS PCS, LLCLake Village 09/03/2010 33-27-50.5 N AR AM
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-301349A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-301349A1.txt
    • 1 08/03/2010 WQIV405 MO Cognis Oleochemicals LLC 467.41250000 Cincinnati 39-10-50.0 N OH 84-30-5.5 W 5 1 08/03/2010 WQJI526 FXO NEPTUNE TECHNOLOGY GROUP, INC. 451.70000000 CLAYSVILLE 40-6-42.3 N PA 80-23-57.3 W 4 1 08/03/2010 WQJI526 FXO NEPTUNE TECHNOLOGY GROUP, INC. 456.70000000 CLAYSVILLE 40-6-42.3 N PA 80-23-57.3 W 4 1 08/03/2010 WQKP434 MO MEDCO HEALTH SOLUTIONS INC. 461.77500000 WHITESTOWN 39-58-29.8 N IN 86-23-0.5 W 1 1 08/03/2010 WQKP434 MO MEDCO HEALTH SOLUTIONS INC. 463.67500000 WHITESTOWN 39-58-29.8 N IN 86-23-0.5 W 1 1 Call Sign Termination Date Stn Class Licensee Name Lower/Upper Frequency City Latitude State Longitude Loc./ Path ## Ant. TP - TV Pickup Broadband Division 07/30/2010 KB96278 MO WLOS LICENSEE, LLC 2025.50000000-2109.50000000 ASHEVILLE 34-51-7.4 N NC 82-23-54.4 W 2 1 Call Sign
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-301457A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-301457A1.txt
    • N Page 6 CF - Common Carrier Fixed Point to Point Microwave State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City VA MD WQMF290 076-16-24.0 W 0004384763 Telecom Transport Management, Inc. Chesapeake 09/10/2010 23310.00000 36-49-35.0 N CA NE 118-11-22.9 W 0004379831 T-MOBILE LICENSE LLC LONG BEACH 09/08/2010 19647.50000 33-50-10.9 N CA NE 118-13-00.5 W 0004379832 T-MOBILE LICENSE LLC RANCHO DOMINGU 09/08/2010 18087.50000 33-51-48.6 N ID NE 116-33-15.7 W 0004380352 Verizon Wireless (VAW) LLC COCOLOLLA 09/08/2010 11245.00000 48-05-37.7 N UT NE 112-46-21.5 W 0004380596 Verizon Wireless (VAW) LLC DELLE 09/08/2010 11225.00000 40-45-27.1 N UT NE 112-46-21.5 W 0004380596 Verizon Wireless (VAW) LLC DELLE 09/08/2010 11305.00000 40-45-27.1 N CO NE 103-51-43.2 W 0004382739 NE Colorado
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-301458A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-301458A1.txt
    • ISSAQUAH 09/10/2010 06197.24000 47-30-16.3 N PA MD WPTG686 079-51-12.2 W 0004384696 PENNSYLVANIA, COMMONWEALTH OFHILLIARDS 09/10/2010 06765.00000 41-05-24.2 N PA MD WPTG686 079-51-12.2 W 0004384696 PENNSYLVANIA, COMMONWEALTH OFHILLIARDS 09/10/2010 06845.00000 41-05-24.2 N WA NE 122-49-06.0 W 0004379254 Kitsap, County of Bremerton 09/07/2010 11405.00000 47-35-15.0 N TX NE P 095-20-00.7 W 0004379729 City of Houston Houston 09/08/2010 02475.06250 29-45-00.8 N AZ NE 110-02-00.5 W 0004382065 NAVAJO COUNTY Show Low 09/08/2010 19345.00000 34-15-19.7 N CA NE 121-43-25.9 W 0004382242 YOLO EMERGENCY COMMUNCATIONSKnights Landing 09/08/2010 10567.50000 38-47-34.0 N CA NE 121-31-46.9 W 0004382251 YOLO EMERGENCY COMMUNICATIONCLARKSBURG 09/08/2010 10572.50000 38-25-12.7 N CA NE 121-29-01.6 W 0004382264 YOLO EMERGENCY COMMUNICATIONSacramento 09/08/2010 06345.49000 38-39-05.9 N CA NE 121-29-01.6 W 0004382264 YOLO EMERGENCY COMMUNICATIONSacramento 09/08/2010 06375.14000 38-39-05.9 N CA
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-301505A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-301505A1.txt
    • 0.0 127.2 4.4 122.8 39.2 12.6 71.0 122.8 DE District of Columbia 191.3 0.0 191.3 3.5 187.8 35.0 26.0 126.8 187.8 DC Florida 2,355.4 (2.7) 2,358.1 384.5 1,973.6 792.6 192.4 940.5 1,925.5 48.1 FL Georgia 1,005.1 (0.1) 1,005.2 99.4 905.8 285.6 91.9 491.0 868.5 37.3 GA Idaho 197.0 (0.1) 197.1 25.3 171.8 61.1 16.8 87.7 165.6 6.2 ID Illinois 1,245.3 (0.5) 1,245.8 208.1 1,037.7 335.8 111.1 554.5 1,001.4 36.3 IL Indiana 683.2 1.9 681.3 113.4 568.0 218.3 50.8 284.8 553.9 14.1 IN Iowa 334.4 0.0 334.4 77.1 257.3 63.5 35.0 150.0 248.5 8.8 IA Kansas 255.6 0.0 255.6 18.8 236.8 55.3 26.7 147.8 229.8 7.1 KS Kentucky 427.3 (1.2) 428.5 78.4 350.2 140.9 42.5 156.4 339.8 10.4 KY Louisiana 383.8 0.0
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-301622A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-301622A1.txt
    • O NEALS 09/15/2010 06615.00000 37-07-39.8 N CA AM WNEV956 119-40-41.5 W 0004307859 Pacific Gas and Electric Company O NEALS 09/15/2010 06635.00000 37-07-39.8 N CA AM WNEV956 119-40-41.5 W 0004307859 Pacific Gas and Electric Company O NEALS 09/15/2010 06675.00000 37-07-39.8 N CA AM WNEV956 119-40-41.5 W 0004307859 Pacific Gas and Electric Company O NEALS 09/15/2010 06685.00000 37-07-39.8 N CA AM KMJ72 119-46-00.5 W 0004307860 Pacific Gas and Electric Company FRESNO 09/15/2010 06315.84000 36-43-09.8 N CA AM WHC232 119-55-00.6 W 0004307861 Pacific Gas and Electric Company MADERA 09/15/2010 06775.00000 36-51-15.8 N CA AM WHC232 119-55-00.6 W 0004307861 Pacific Gas and Electric Company MADERA 09/15/2010 06845.00000 36-51-15.8 N NV AM WPOQ622 119-46-40.3 W 0004309809 TRUCKEE MEADOWS COMMUNITY CORENO 09/14/2010 17865.00000 39-28-26.4 N NV AM
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-301765A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-301765A1.txt
    • LLC Hopkinsville 09/21/2010 10835.00000 36-47-05.0 N VA NE 082-11-04.9 W 0004394745 Conterra Ultra Broadband LLC LEBANON 09/21/2010 10755.00000 36-50-16.0 N VA NE 082-11-04.9 W 0004394745 Conterra Ultra Broadband LLC LEBANON 09/21/2010 10795.00000 36-50-16.0 N VA NE 082-11-04.9 W 0004394745 Conterra Ultra Broadband LLC LEBANON 09/21/2010 10835.00000 36-50-16.0 N TN NE 082-44-23.8 W 0004394746 Conterra Ultra Broadband LLC TUSCULUM 09/21/2010 10875.00000 36-10-00.5 N VA NE 082-04-48.0 W 0004394747 Conterra Ultra Broadband LLC ABINGDON 09/21/2010 11245.00000 36-49-48.0 N VA NE 082-04-48.0 W 0004394747 Conterra Ultra Broadband LLC ABINGDON 09/21/2010 11285.00000 36-49-48.0 N Page 12 CF - Common Carrier Fixed Point to Point Microwave State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City TN NE 083-56-39.8
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-301767A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-301767A1.txt
    • IIIPainesville Twp 09/22/2010 23025.00000 41-41-54.3 N OH NE 081-32-24.0 W 0004397016 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIShaker Heights 09/22/2010 23175.00000 41-28-35.9 N OH NE 081-45-33.4 W 0004397098 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIINORTH ROYALTON 09/22/2010 23025.00000 41-18-53.1 N OH NE 081-45-33.4 W 0004397098 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIINORTH ROYALTON 09/22/2010 23125.00000 41-18-53.1 N OH NE 081-58-22.4 W 0004397099 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIINorth Ridgeville 09/22/2010 23275.00000 41-25-00.5 N OH NE 081-44-12.7 W 0004397100 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIParma Heights 09/22/2010 17965.00000 41-21-09.4 N OH NE 081-44-12.7 W 0004397100 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIParma Heights 09/22/2010 18065.00000 41-21-09.4 N OH NE 081-44-12.7 W 0004397100 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIParma Heights 09/22/2010 21825.00000 41-21-09.4 N OH NE 081-44-12.7 W 0004397100 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIParma Heights 09/22/2010 21975.00000 41-21-09.4 N OH NE 081-52-41.2
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-301768A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-301768A1.txt
    • 33-42-16.6 N CA NE 117-53-59.0 W 0004398143 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIICosta Mesa 09/23/2010 18015.00000 33-39-42.0 N CA NE 117-43-05.1 W 0004398146 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIChino Hills 09/23/2010 21925.00000 33-59-25.3 N CA NE 117-50-35.9 W 0004398150 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIISANTA ANA 09/23/2010 23225.00000 33-45-32.1 N CA NE 118-00-55.1 W 0004398154 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIHuntington Beach 09/23/2010 23325.00000 33-44-38.5 N CA NE 117-58-00.5 W 0004398156 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIGarden Grove 09/23/2010 21825.00000 33-47-21.8 N CA NE 117-58-00.5 W 0004398156 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIGarden Grove 09/23/2010 22025.00000 33-47-21.8 N CA NE 118-02-36.1 W 0004398159 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIILos Alamitos 09/23/2010 23125.00000 33-48-09.4 N Page 33 MG - Microwave Industrial/Business Pool State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-301769A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-301769A1.txt
    • IIIColumbus 09/24/2010 11665.00000 39-58-39.4 N OH NE 083-01-08.4 W 0004399847 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIColumbia 09/24/2010 23175.00000 39-57-15.1 N OH NE 082-57-06.1 W 0004399848 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIColumbus 09/24/2010 23175.00000 40-04-09.1 N OH NE 082-50-13.5 W 0004399849 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIICANAL WINCHEST 09/24/2010 23175.00000 39-52-38.2 N OH NE 082-59-45.0 W 0004399851 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIColumbus 09/24/2010 21975.00000 40-00-09.5 N OH NE 082-58-00.5 W 0004399852 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIColumbus 09/24/2010 11305.00000 39-52-51.2 N OH NE 082-58-00.5 W 0004399852 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIColumbus 09/24/2010 11425.00000 39-52-51.2 N Page 8 MG - Microwave Industrial/Business Pool State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City OH NE 082-58-00.5 W 0004399852 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIColumbus 09/24/2010 11545.00000 39-52-51.2 N
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-301823A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-301823A1.txt
    • 1.1 1.5 2.5 0.8 2.8 4.1 13.9 53.0 22.6 0.3 97.5 100.0 FTTP 0.2 0.0 0.2 0.7 1.4 2.7 24.2 1.3 68.4 1.2 99.8 100.0 Satellite 53.2 35.0 88.3 * * * * 0.0 0.0 0.0 11.7 100.0 Fixed Wireless 14.2 4.5 18.7 20.8 22.3 25.2 9.2 1.9 1.8 0.2 81.3 100.0 Mobile Wireless 30.2 11.9 42.1 17.1 33.3 7.0 0.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 57.9 100.0 Power Line and Other 0.0 0.0 0.0 * * * * 0.0 * 0.0 100.0 100.0 Total 9.6 6.3 15.9 6.9 15.5 13.2 14.8 22.3 11.3 0.2 84.1 100.0 # = Rounds to Zero. * = Data withheld to maintain firm confidentiality. Source: Industry Analysis and Technology Division, Wireline Competition Bureau, High-Speed Services for Internet
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-301909A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-301909A1.txt
    • W 0004402378 New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC Speculator 09/27/2010 43-31-25.4 N NY MD KNKN864 073-24-24.4 W 0004402378 New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC Ticonderoga 09/27/2010 43-49-53.8 N NY MD KNKN864 074-28-32.8 W 0004402378 New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC Tupper Lake 09/27/2010 44-09-35.3 N NY MD KNKN864 073-25-53.2 W 0004402378 New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC Willsboro 09/27/2010 44-24-19.2 N NY MD KNKN864 073-26-00.5 W 0004402378 New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC WILSBORO 09/27/2010 44-24-12.2 N OR MD KNKN411 122-52-08.6 W 0004402499 Verizon Wireless (VAW) LLC St. Helens 09/27/2010 45-51-32.1 N CA MD KNKA409 119-58-45.2 W 0004402951 GTE MOBILNET OF SANTA BARBARA LSANTA BARBARA 09/27/2010 34-31-36.1 N CA MD KNKA366 119-27-09.2 W 0004405407 NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS PCS, LLCAuberry 09/29/2010 37-00-47.1 N CA MD KNKA366 120-06-16.7
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-301910A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-301910A1.txt
    • TTY: 1-888-835-5322 th 445 12St., S.W. Below is a listing of applications, subject to the pre-grant notice and petition procedure of Section 309 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, that were accepted for filing. AF - Aeronautical and Fixed State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City IL NE 090-31-00.5 W 0004405527 Elliott Aviation of the Quad Cities Inc Moline 09/29/2010 00122.95000 41-27-00.1 N AS - Aural Studio Transmitter Link State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City MI MD WPNG794 083-40-57.1 W 0004404241 AM MEDIA SERVICES Ann Arbor 09/28/2010 00944.87500 42-19-01.2 N MI MD WPNG794 083-40-57.1 W 0004404241 AM MEDIA
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-302100A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-302100A1.txt
    • 10/06/2010 02197.60000 43-26-28.0 N Page 5 MW - Microwave Public Safety Pool State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City MN MD WPYH735 096-02-56.1 W 0004412173 Minnesota, State of Erhard 10/06/2010 05945.20000 46-28-26.6 N MN MD WQKX256 095-23-51.2 W 0004412338 Minnesota, State of Warroad 10/06/2010 06541.25000 48-50-49.3 N MN MD WPWD820 096-39-00.5 W 0004412906 STATE OF MINNESOTA Angus 10/06/2010 06595.00000 48-02-02.7 N AZ MD WQKA561 112-17-24.6 W 0004413062 City of Avondale Avondale 10/06/2010 19315.00000 33-28-03.2 N MN MD WQDM485 096-36-19.2 W 0004413094 Minnesota, State of Lake Bronson 10/06/2010 06541.25000 48-43-02.1 N MN MD WQDM485 096-36-19.2 W 0004413094 Minnesota, State of Lake Bronson 10/06/2010 06755.00000 48-43-02.1 N MN MD WQDM485 096-36-19.2 W 0004413094
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-302101A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-302101A1.txt
    • HOLDINGS IIICincinnati 10/04/2010 23225.00000 39-10-01.2 N OH NE 084-25-44.8 W 0004409791 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIICINCINNATI 10/04/2010 19375.00000 39-06-21.2 N OH NE 084-25-44.8 W 0004409791 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIICINCINNATI 10/04/2010 19475.00000 39-06-21.2 N OH NE 084-25-44.8 W 0004409791 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIICINCINNATI 10/04/2010 19525.00000 39-06-21.2 N OH NE 084-25-44.8 W 0004409791 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIICINCINNATI 10/04/2010 19625.00000 39-06-21.2 N OH NE 084-36-00.5 W 0004409792 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIICincinnati 10/04/2010 19525.00000 39-06-33.9 N OH NE 084-36-00.5 W 0004409792 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIICincinnati 10/04/2010 19625.00000 39-06-33.9 N OH NE 084-36-00.5 W 0004409792 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIICincinnati 10/04/2010 23075.00000 39-06-33.9 N OH NE 084-36-00.5 W 0004409792 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIICincinnati 10/04/2010 23225.00000 39-06-33.9 N OH NE 084-31-15.3 W 0004409794 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIICincinnati 10/04/2010 21825.00000
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-302271A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-302271A1.txt
    • HOLDINGS IIIBrentwood 10/14/2010 10775.00000 36-02-11.9 N TN MD WQLR986 086-46-54.4 W 0004421089 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIBrentwood 10/14/2010 10895.00000 36-02-11.9 N TN MD WQLR986 086-46-54.4 W 0004421089 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIBrentwood 10/14/2010 11055.00000 36-02-11.9 N TN MD WQLR986 086-46-54.4 W 0004421089 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIBrentwood 10/14/2010 11175.00000 36-02-11.9 N TN MD WQMD598 086-41-50.3 W 0004421090 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIINASHVILLE 10/14/2010 21825.00000 36-07-00.5 N TN MD WQMD598 086-41-50.3 W 0004421090 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIINASHVILLE 10/14/2010 21975.00000 36-07-00.5 N TN MD WQIP571 086-48-35.0 W 0004421091 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS II BRENTWOOD 10/14/2010 11225.00000 35-58-25.0 N TN MD WQIP571 086-48-35.0 W 0004421091 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS II BRENTWOOD 10/14/2010 11285.00000 35-58-25.0 N TN MD WQIP571 086-48-35.0 W 0004421091 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS II BRENTWOOD 10/14/2010 11305.00000 35-58-25.0 N
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-302397A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-302397A1.txt
    • MD WQLY425 121-59-54.2 W 0004425312 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIISunnyvale 10/18/2010 21875.00000 37-23-01.5 N CA MD WQLY425 121-59-54.2 W 0004425312 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIISunnyvale 10/18/2010 22025.00000 37-23-01.5 N CA MD WQMM302 121-55-04.8 W 0004425314 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIISan Jose 10/18/2010 21825.00000 37-16-15.2 N CA MD WQMM302 121-55-04.8 W 0004425314 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIISan Jose 10/18/2010 21975.00000 37-16-15.2 N CA MD WQLY444 122-30-00.5 W 0004425315 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIISan Rafael 10/18/2010 18015.00000 37-59-24.8 N CA MD WQLY444 122-30-00.5 W 0004425315 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIISan Rafael 10/18/2010 18115.00000 37-59-24.8 N CA MD WQLY444 122-30-00.5 W 0004425315 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIISan Rafael 10/18/2010 19525.00000 37-59-24.8 N CA MD WQLY444 122-30-00.5 W 0004425315 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIISan Rafael 10/18/2010 19625.00000 37-59-24.8 N CA MD WQLY444 122-30-00.5
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-302402A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-302402A1.txt
    • 064-54-38.2 W 0004423751 U.S. VIRGIN ISLANDS BUREAU OF IT Charlotte Amalie 10/18/2010 19625.00000 18-19-47.7 N TX MD WQFF428 097-00-31.7 W 0004424183 Falls County, Texas Lott 10/18/2010 00933.97500 31-14-14.9 N TX MD WQFF428 097-00-31.7 W 0004424183 Falls County, Texas Lott 10/18/2010 00954.35000 31-14-14.9 N TX MD WQFF428 097-00-31.7 W 0004424183 Falls County, Texas Lott 10/18/2010 00954.75000 31-14-14.9 N TX MD WQFF429 096-47-00.5 W 0004424184 Falls County, Texas Reagan 10/18/2010 00957.95000 31-13-15.1 N TX MD WQFF430 096-52-36.0 W 0004424185 Falls County, Texas Marlin 10/18/2010 00958.35000 31-17-40.1 N TX MD WQFF431 096-53-14.6 W 0004424186 Falls County, Texas Perry 10/18/2010 00942.97500 31-27-36.0 N ME MD WQML279 069-57-48.0 W 0004424772 Town of Brunswick Maine Brunswick 10/18/2010 11285.00000 43-54-21.4 N ME MD WQML279 069-57-48.0 W 0004424772 Town
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-302570A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-302570A1.txt
    • N OH NE 084-07-47.3 W 0004435536 FiberTower Network Services Corp. Lima 10/28/2010 11265.00000 40-45-23.8 N OH NE 084-07-47.3 W 0004435536 FiberTower Network Services Corp. Lima 10/28/2010 11385.00000 40-45-23.8 N PA NE 079-37-38.0 W 0004435540 FiberTower Network Services Corp. JEANNETTE 10/28/2010 17755.00000 40-18-44.0 N PA NE 079-42-14.6 W 0004435544 FiberTower Network Services Corp. Lower Burrell 10/28/2010 10715.00000 40-34-43.6 N AZ NE 111-07-00.5 W 0004435552 Sparkplug Southwest, LLC Tucson 10/28/2010 19495.00000 32-14-56.4 N Page 10 CF - Common Carrier Fixed Point to Point Microwave State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City PA NE 079-36-29.2 W 0004436247 FiberTower Network Services Corp. Greensburg 10/29/2010 10755.00000 40-17-29.9 N NV NE 115-15-25.5 W 0004436370 Lincoln County Telephone
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-302571A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-302571A1.txt
    • Carolina State Highway Patrol Jackson 10/27/2010 06765.00000 36-19-53.2 N WA MD WQJW343 122-31-33.5 W 0004433549 WASHINGTON, STATE OF Bellingham 10/27/2010 06345.49000 48-47-12.2 N Page 3 MW - Microwave Public Safety Pool State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City AZ MD WNEF378 112-04-06.2 W 0004433651 CENTRAL ARIZONA WATER CONSERVPHOENIX 10/27/2010 06034.15000 33-42-00.5 N AZ MD WNEF373 112-34-42.6 W 0004433652 CENTRAL ARIZONA WATER CONSERVLITCHFIELD PARK 10/27/2010 06286.19000 33-34-35.1 N WA MD WBH473 122-55-36.6 W 0004433740 WASHINGTON, STATE OF GARDINER 10/27/2010 06315.84000 48-00-58.3 N MA MD WPTG343 071-17-43.2 W 0004433965 Massachusetts Water Resources AuthorityWeston 10/27/2010 06645.00000 42-20-05.3 N MA MD WPTG343 071-17-43.2 W 0004433965 Massachusetts Water Resources AuthorityWeston 10/27/2010 11285.00000 42-20-05.3 N MA MD
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-302705A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-302705A1.txt
    • N MA MD KNKN705 070-00-54.9 W 0004440491 NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS PCS, LLCCHATHAM 11/03/2010 41-41-11.9 N MA MD KNKN705 070-44-01.2 W 0004440491 NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS PCS, LLCCHILMARK 11/03/2010 41-21-23.1 N MA MD KNKN705 069-58-52.0 W 0004440491 NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS PCS, LLCEASTHAM 11/03/2010 41-52-02.0 N MA MD KNKN705 070-36-36.6 W 0004440491 NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS PCS, LLCFALMOUTH 11/03/2010 41-36-53.7 N MA MD KNKN705 070-24-00.5 W 0004440491 NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS PCS, LLCMARSTON MILLS 11/03/2010 41-39-33.0 N MA MD KNKN705 070-31-28.2 W 0004440491 NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS PCS, LLCMARTHA VINEYAR 11/03/2010 41-23-03.7 N MA MD KNKN705 070-03-40.7 W 0004440491 NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS PCS, LLCNANTUCKET 11/03/2010 41-15-40.4 N Page 27 CL - Cellular State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-302706A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-302706A1.txt
    • N VA AM WNJY518 078-43-53.1 W 0004431797 MILLENIUM 2000 INC HARRISONBURG 11/04/2010 00464.02500 38-26-51.4 N RO WNIC221 0004443212 DOTSCHKAL, ANTON A 11/04/2010 LP - Broadcast Auxiliary Low Power State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City VA AM BLP01143 P 077-30-21.9 W 0004441784 WWBT LICENSE SUBSIDIARY, LLC 11/05/2010 00174.00000 - 00216.00000 37-30-00.5 N VA AM BLP01143 P 077-30-21.9 W 0004441784 WWBT LICENSE SUBSIDIARY, LLC 11/05/2010 00494.00000 - 00608.00000 37-30-00.5 N Page 41 LP - Broadcast Auxiliary Low Power State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City VA AM BLP01143 P 077-30-21.9 W 0004441784 WWBT LICENSE SUBSIDIARY, LLC 11/05/2010 00614.00000 - 00698.00000 37-30-00.5 N
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-302817A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-302817A1.txt
    • Communications, Inc. Houston 11/09/2010 10815.00000 29-45-06.0 N PR NE 066-06-58.7 W 0004448061 T-MOBILE PUERTO RICO LLC OLD SAN JUAN 11/09/2010 17755.00000 18-27-53.8 N NY NE 075-28-48.7 W 0004448069 Upstate Cellular Network Sherburne 11/09/2010 06004.50000 42-40-02.5 N NY NE 075-30-44.7 W 0004448072 Upstate Cellular Network HAMILTON 11/09/2010 06256.54000 42-49-50.1 N FL NE 080-08-29.7 W 0004448317 airBand Communications, Inc. Aventura 11/09/2010 11645.00000 25-57-00.5 N OR NE 116-57-56.0 W 0004448398 RCC Minnesota, Inc. ONTARIO 11/10/2010 11245.00000 44-00-35.0 N OR NE 116-59-27.0 W 0004448399 RCC Minnesota, Inc. ONTARIO 11/10/2010 10755.00000 43-55-27.0 N CA NE 117-12-08.2 W 0004448441 airBand Communications, Inc. San Diego 11/10/2010 17755.00000 32-54-02.7 N CA NE 117-12-29.3 W 0004448442 airBand Communications, Inc. San Diego 11/10/2010 19315.00000 32-52-28.4 N FL NE 080-04-39.1 W 0004448444
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-302818A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-302818A1.txt
    • WQJD448 115-14-01.2 W 0004449874 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS II LAS VEGAS 11/12/2010 23025.00000 36-00-56.3 N NV MD WQJD448 115-14-01.2 W 0004449874 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS II LAS VEGAS 11/12/2010 23125.00000 36-00-56.3 N NV MD WQJD448 115-14-01.2 W 0004449874 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS II LAS VEGAS 11/12/2010 23225.00000 36-00-56.3 N NV MD WQJE712 115-10-23.7 W 0004450025 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS II LAS VEGAS 11/12/2010 23025.00000 36-08-00.5 N NV MD WQJE712 115-10-23.7 W 0004450025 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS II LAS VEGAS 11/12/2010 23075.00000 36-08-00.5 N NV MD WQJE712 115-10-23.7 W 0004450025 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS II LAS VEGAS 11/12/2010 23125.00000 36-08-00.5 N NV MD WQJE712 115-10-23.7 W 0004450025 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS II LAS VEGAS 11/12/2010 23175.00000 36-08-00.5 N NV MD WQJE712 115-10-23.7 W 0004450025 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS II LAS
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303067A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303067A1.txt
    • 46-19-19.4 N Page 7 CF - Common Carrier Fixed Point to Point Microwave State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City TX MD WPND444 101-27-55.0 W 0004508114 New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC BIG SPRING 11/23/2010 05945.20000 32-10-59.0 N WA MD WHF503 119-19-09.6 W 0004508137 NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS PCS, LLCRICHLAND 11/23/2010 06152.75000 46-14-00.5 N WA MD WHF503 119-19-09.6 W 0004508137 NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS PCS, LLCRICHLAND 11/23/2010 06585.00000 46-14-00.5 N WA MD WHF503 119-19-09.6 W 0004508137 NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS PCS, LLCRICHLAND 11/23/2010 06640.00000 46-14-00.5 N WA MD WHF503 119-19-09.6 W 0004508137 NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS PCS, LLCRICHLAND 11/23/2010 17950.00000 46-14-00.5 N NC NE 078-37-23.9 W 0004505778 Conterra Ultra Broadband LLC DUNN 11/22/2010 11285.00000 35-16-14.9 N
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303375A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303375A1.txt
    • LLC 10/30/2010 Location Termination Pending Call Sign Termination Licensee Name Location Date # City Latitude State Longitude Frequency Termination Pending Call Sign Termination Date Stn Class Licensee Name Lower/Upper Frequency City Latitude State Longitude Loc./ Path ## Ant. CF - Common Carrier Fixed Point to Point Microwave Broadband Division 11/04/2010 WGX509 FXO WHIDBEY TELEPHONE COMPANY 6197.24000000 LANGLEY 48-0-27.3 N WA 122-27-0.5 W 5 1 11/04/2010 WGX509 FXO WHIDBEY TELEPHONE COMPANY 6315.84000000 LANGLEY 48-0-27.3 N WA 122-27-0.5 W 5 1 11/04/2010 WLK849 FXO WHIDBEY TELEPHONE COMPANY 5945.20000000 EASTSOUND 48-40-47.3 N WA 122-50-28.6 W4 1 11/04/2010 WLK849 FXO WHIDBEY TELEPHONE COMPANY 6063.80000000 EASTSOUND 48-40-47.3 N WA 122-50-28.6 W4 1 Page 2 Frequency Termination Pending Call Sign Termination Date Stn Class Licensee Name Lower/Upper
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303393A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303393A1.txt
    • Mobilnet of Texas RSA #17 Limited PHUNTSVILLE 12/02/2010 06004.50000 30-36-59.5 N TX AM WQLB637 095-30-27.6 W 0004501266 GTE Mobilnet of Texas RSA #17 Limited PHUNTSVILLE 12/02/2010 06123.10000 30-36-59.5 N TX AM WQLB637 095-30-27.6 W 0004501266 GTE Mobilnet of Texas RSA #17 Limited PHUNTSVILLE 12/02/2010 06152.75000 30-36-59.5 N WA AM WHF503 119-19-09.6 W 0004508137 NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS PCS, LLCRICHLAND 12/03/2010 06152.75000 46-14-00.5 N WA AM WHF503 119-19-09.6 W 0004508137 NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS PCS, LLCRICHLAND 12/03/2010 06585.00000 46-14-00.5 N WA AM WHF503 119-19-09.6 W 0004508137 NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS PCS, LLCRICHLAND 12/03/2010 06640.00000 46-14-00.5 N WA AM WHF503 119-19-09.6 W 0004508137 NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS PCS, LLCRICHLAND 12/03/2010 17950.00000 46-14-00.5 N TX MD WQKW406 095-38-23.0 W 0004515881 GTE Mobilnet of Texas RSA #17 LTD PrtnCrockett
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303405A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303405A1.txt
    • Less than 768 kbps 51,573 7,153 7,216 65,942 At least 768 kbps & Less than 1.5 mbps 24,346 7,669 19,522 51,536 At least 1.5 mbps 676 1,350 13,644 15,670 Total 76,594 16,172 40,382 133,148 Percentages Less than 768 kbps 38.7 5.4 5.4 49.5 At least 768 kbps & Less than 1.5 mbps 18.3 5.8 14.7 38.7 At least 1.5 mbps 0.5 1.0 10.2 11.8 Total 57.5 12.1 30.3 100.0 Note: Figures may not sum to totals due to rounding. Source: FCC Form 477, Part I. U.S. Federal Communications Commission Internet Access Services: Status as of December 31, 2009 16 3 Chart 2 Distribution of Fixed Connections over 200 kbps in at Least One Direction as of December 31, 2009 Downstream Speed
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303634A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303634A1.txt
    • N CO MD WQMP704 105-02-48.6 W 0004526830 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIDenver 12/08/2010 23275.00000 39-42-03.2 N CO MD WQMP704 105-02-48.6 W 0004526830 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIDenver 12/08/2010 23325.00000 39-42-03.2 N CO MD WQMP704 105-02-48.6 W 0004526830 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIDenver 12/08/2010 23475.00000 39-42-03.2 N CO MD WNTA404 105-11-34.0 W 0004526860 CBS Broadcasting Inc. Golden 12/08/2010 21835.00000 39-43-16.0 N TX MD WQJS606 095-31-00.5 W 0004527261 Franklin Group Inc. HOUSTON 12/08/2010 11015.00000 29-42-06.8 N TX MD WQIK956 095-25-26.0 W 0004527275 Franklin Group Inc. Houston 12/08/2010 11185.00000 29-48-41.3 N Page 44 MG - Microwave Industrial/Business Pool State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City TX MD WQJZ815 095-28-55.7 W 0004527277 Franklin Group Inc. HOUSTON 12/08/2010 11505.00000
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303729A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303729A1.txt
    • Palatine Palatine 12/13/2010 22175.00000 42-07-56.8 N IL NE 088-04-14.1 W 0004532198 Village of Palatine Palatine 12/13/2010 23375.00000 42-07-28.2 N IL NE 088-04-14.1 W 0004532198 Village of Palatine Palatine 12/13/2010 23425.00000 42-07-28.2 N IL NE 088-04-14.1 W 0004532198 Village of Palatine Palatine 12/13/2010 23475.00000 42-07-28.2 N IL NE 088-02-52.8 W 0004532201 Village of Palatine Palatine 12/13/2010 22225.00000 42-05-47.1 N FL NE 081-54-00.5 W 0004533297 Hardee County - IDA Wauchula 12/15/2010 10775.00000 27-31-34.2 N FL NE 081-54-00.5 W 0004533297 Hardee County - IDA Wauchula 12/15/2010 10975.00000 27-31-34.2 N OR NE 120-50-35.7 W 0004533843 Frontier Telenet Prineville 12/15/2010 06404.79000 44-18-08.7 N OR NE 121-08-50.0 W 0004533847 Frontier Telenet Madras 12/15/2010 06375.14000 44-39-49.7 N Page 3 MW - Microwave Public Safety Pool State Purpose Call
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303822A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303822A1.txt
    • IL MD KBV58 090-30-33.4 W 0004538442 ILLINOIS RURAL ELECTRIC COMPANYWINCHESTER 12/17/2010 17865.00000 39-35-42.1 N IL MD KBV58 090-30-33.4 W 0004538442 ILLINOIS RURAL ELECTRIC COMPANYWINCHESTER 12/17/2010 17995.00000 39-35-42.1 N GA MD WNTU508 084-44-49.7 W 0004538515 FLINT ELECTRIC MEMBERSHIP CORPOUPATOI 12/17/2010 06835.00000 32-33-09.5 N VI MD WQHZ550 064-45-16.6 W 0004539008 Broadband VI, LLC Christiansted, VI 12/17/2010 11225.00000 17-43-19.0 N OH MD WQNB944 084-36-00.5 W 0004539135 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIICincinnati 12/20/2010 19525.00000 39-06-33.9 N OH MD WQNB944 084-36-00.5 W 0004539135 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIICincinnati 12/20/2010 19625.00000 39-06-33.9 N OH MD WQNB944 084-36-00.5 W 0004539135 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIICincinnati 12/20/2010 23075.00000 39-06-33.9 N OH MD WQNB944 084-36-00.5 W 0004539135 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIICincinnati 12/20/2010 23225.00000 39-06-33.9 N Page 44 MG - Microwave Industrial/Business Pool State
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303886A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303886A1.txt
    • Millions of D ollar s Total 56 1261835006027579151,0281,0721,1321,1881,2631,6901,7182,2352,5922,9353,2653,4683,7964,1104,2894,0824,2924,752 1986198719881989199019911992199319941995199619971998199920002001200220032004200520062007200820092010 3 - 15 YearCompaniesHigh-Cost Loop Support Safety Net Additive Support Safety Valve Support High-Cost Model Support Long- Term Support Interstate Common Line Support Interstate Access Support Local Switching Support Total Support ILECs 864.2 - - - 472.9 - - 380.3 1,717.4 1999 CETCs 0.1 - - - 0.4 - - 0.0 0.5 Total 864.3 - - - 473.3 - - 380.3 1,718.0 ILECs 873.8 - - 218.7 477.3 - 278.8 384.7 2,233.3 2000 CETCs 0.4 - - 0.0 1.1 - 0.0 0.0 1.5 Total 874.1 - - 218.7 478.4 - 278.8 384.7 2,234.8 ILECs 921.5 - - 205.4 484.2 - 575.7 387.9 2,574.7 2001 CETCs 5.7 - - 0.3 8.0 - 1.0
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303886A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303886A5.txt
    • Millions of D ollar s Total 56 1261835006027579151,0281,0721,1321,1881,2631,6901,7182,2352,5922,9353,2653,4683,7964,1104,2894,0824,2924,752 1986198719881989199019911992199319941995199619971998199920002001200220032004200520062007200820092010 3 - 15 YearCompaniesHigh-Cost Loop Support Safety Net Additive Support Safety Valve Support High-Cost Model Support Long- Term Support Interstate Common Line Support Interstate Access Support Local Switching Support Total Support ILECs 864.2 - - - 472.9 - - 380.3 1,717.4 1999 CETCs 0.1 - - - 0.4 - - 0.0 0.5 Total 864.3 - - - 473.3 - - 380.3 1,718.0 ILECs 873.8 - - 218.7 477.3 - 278.8 384.7 2,233.3 2000 CETCs 0.4 - - 0.0 1.1 - 0.0 0.0 1.5 Total 874.1 - - 218.7 478.4 - 278.8 384.7 2,234.8 ILECs 921.5 - - 205.4 484.2 - 575.7 387.9 2,574.7 2001 CETCs 5.7 - - 0.3 8.0 - 1.0
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303886A9.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303886A9.txt
    • 15.6 14.6 15.9 6.2 8.0 1982 10.8 9.0 2.7 3.9 4.2 1.7 1983 3.1 0.2 1.4 0.0 7.4 3.9 1984 17.2 10.4 -4.3 -5.1 3.6 3.8 1985 8.9 12.4 -3.7 -3.0 0.6 2.1 1986 7.1 8.9 -9.4 -10.0 0.3 -3.5 1987 3.3 2.6 -12.4 -11.8 -3.0 -3.0 1988 4.5 4.6 -4.2 -2.1 -4.2 -3.8 1989 0.6 1.9 -1.3 -1.7 -2.6 0.5 1990 1.0 1.5 -3.7 -0.1 -2.2 -2.2 1991 5.1 2.1 1.3 -1.3 -1.5 -2.6 1992 0.5 -0.2 -1.3 1.0 -2.4 1.3 1993 1.0 0.8 6.5 3.8 0.2 -1.1 1994 -0.3 0.7 5.4 6.1 -1.0 -1.4 1995 2.6 2 0.1 2 -3.8 2 1996 0.9 0.2 3.7 0.8 6.1 0.9 1997 1.0 0.1 -4.3 7.8 2.8 -4.3 1998 1.3 0.0 -0.8
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303900A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303900A1.txt
    • 73 1.3 146 2.6 69 1.2 24 0.4 3,873 67.6 5,730 American Samoa 27 66.4 0 0.0 1 1.4 0 0.0 1 2.0 12 30.1 40 Arizona 13,542 62.7 68 0.3 207 1.0 757 3.5 281 1.3 6,742 31.2 21,598 Arkansas 5,163 35.8 409 2.8 41 0.3 221 1.5 216 1.5 8,385 58.1 14,435 California 80,655 52.1 2,126 1.4 709 0.5 4,333 2.8 3,273 2.1 63,689 41.1 154,786 Colorado 12,365 58.1 104 0.5 127 0.6 659 3.1 402 1.9 7,633 35.9 21,288 Connecticut 7,945 52.7 329 2.2 93 0.6 347 2.3 198 1.3 6,174 40.9 15,086 Delaware 2,664 56.5 37 0.8 40 0.9 108 2.3 25 0.5 1,843 39.1 4,718 District of Columbia 4,441 74.3 16 0.3 66 1.1 224 3.8
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303907A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303907A1.txt
    • 124-07-12.1 W 0004551634 CALIFORNIA RURAL SERVICE AREA #1SCOTIA 12/30/2010 02165.20000 40-24-57.4 N CA RM WMR929 124-07-12.1 W 0004551634 CALIFORNIA RURAL SERVICE AREA #1SCOTIA 12/30/2010 05945.20000 40-24-57.4 N CA RM WMR929 124-07-12.1 W 0004551634 CALIFORNIA RURAL SERVICE AREA #1SCOTIA 12/30/2010 05974.85000 40-24-57.4 N CA RM WMR929 124-07-12.1 W 0004551634 CALIFORNIA RURAL SERVICE AREA #1SCOTIA 12/30/2010 06585.00000 40-24-57.4 N CA RM WMR928 123-44-00.5 W 0004551728 CALIFORNIA RURAL SERVICE AREA #1WILLOW CREEK 12/30/2010 02115.20000 40-52-27.4 N CA RM WMR928 123-44-00.5 W 0004551728 CALIFORNIA RURAL SERVICE AREA #1WILLOW CREEK 12/30/2010 06004.50000 40-52-27.4 N CA RM WMR928 123-44-00.5 W 0004551728 CALIFORNIA RURAL SERVICE AREA #1WILLOW CREEK 12/30/2010 10628.75000 40-52-27.4 N CA RM WMR928 123-44-00.5 W 0004551728 CALIFORNIA RURAL SERVICE AREA #1WILLOW CREEK 12/30/2010 10647.50000 40-52-27.4 N
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-304030A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-304030A1.txt
    • N CA MD WQLV292 118-08-57.3 W 0004560946 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIICommerce 01/05/2011 23125.00000 33-58-46.5 N CA MD WQLV292 118-08-57.3 W 0004560946 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIICommerce 01/05/2011 23175.00000 33-58-46.5 N CA MD WQLV292 118-08-57.3 W 0004560946 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIICommerce 01/05/2011 23225.00000 33-58-46.5 N CA MD WQLV292 118-08-57.3 W 0004560946 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIICommerce 01/05/2011 23275.00000 33-58-46.5 N CA MD WQLU932 118-21-00.5 W 0004560948 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIInglewood 01/05/2011 19525.00000 33-57-35.6 N CA MD WQLU932 118-21-00.5 W 0004560948 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIInglewood 01/05/2011 19625.00000 33-57-35.6 N CA MD WQLU932 118-21-00.5 W 0004560948 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIInglewood 01/05/2011 23025.00000 33-57-35.6 N CA MD WQLU932 118-21-00.5 W 0004560948 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIInglewood 01/05/2011 23075.00000 33-57-35.6 N CA MD WQLU932 118-21-00.5 W 0004560948 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-304032A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-304032A1.txt
    • 21925.00000 34-03-59.4 N CA MD WQLN758 117-17-20.5 W 0004562623 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIISan Bernardino 01/06/2011 22025.00000 34-03-59.4 N CA MD WQLN758 117-17-20.5 W 0004562623 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIISan Bernardino 01/06/2011 22075.00000 34-03-59.4 N Page 17 MG - Microwave Industrial/Business Pool State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City CA MD WQNA849 117-58-00.5 W 0004562624 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIGarden Grove 01/06/2011 19475.00000 33-47-21.8 N CA MD WQNA849 117-58-00.5 W 0004562624 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIGarden Grove 01/06/2011 21825.00000 33-47-21.8 N CA MD WQNA849 117-58-00.5 W 0004562624 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIGarden Grove 01/06/2011 22025.00000 33-47-21.8 N CA MD WQKV498 117-45-05.4 W 0004562625 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIIrvine 01/06/2011 10815.00000 33-39-29.3 N CA MD WQKV498 117-45-05.4 W
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-304136A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-304136A1.txt
    • 122-25-30.7 W 0004569152 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIISan Bruno 01/12/2011 10975.00000 37-37-41.5 N CA MD WQLY331 122-25-30.7 W 0004569152 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIISan Bruno 01/12/2011 17965.00000 37-37-41.5 N CA MD WQLY331 122-25-30.7 W 0004569152 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIISan Bruno 01/12/2011 18115.00000 37-37-41.5 N CA MD WQLY331 122-25-30.7 W 0004569152 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIISan Bruno 01/12/2011 22055.00000 37-37-41.5 N CA MD KMJ72 119-46-00.5 W 0004571394 Pacific Gas and Electric Company FRESNO 01/13/2011 06765.00000 36-43-09.8 N IL MD WQLC953 090-13-12.1 W 0004571480 llinois Rural Electric Cooperative WOODSON 01/13/2011 10995.00000 39-37-42.8 N IL MD WQKS332 089-55-29.2 W 0004571481 llinois Rural Electric Cooperative NEW BERLIN 01/13/2011 11485.00000 39-43-54.7 N NM NE 106-57-47.2 W 0004567240 Transworld Network Corp Socorro 01/11/2011 06345.49000 34-04-17.8 N NM NE 106-57-47.2 W
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-304359A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-304359A1.pdf
    • 2011 By the District Director, San Francisco Office, Western Region, Enforcement Bureau: This is a Notice of Violation ("Notice") issued pursuant to Section 1.89 of the Commission's Rules, to Churchill County Telephone and Telegraph registrant of antenna structure #1012853 in Fallon, Nevada. On September 28, 2010, agents of the Enforcement Bureau's San Francisco Office inspected antenna structure #1012853 located approximately 0.5 mile southeast of Fallon Municipal Airport in Fallon, Nevada, and observed the following violation: 47 C.F.R. § 17.21: ``Antenna structures shall be painted and lighted when: (a) they exceed 60.96 meters (200 feet) in height above the ground or they require special aeronautical study.'' The FCC Antenna Structure Registration for antenna structure # 1012853 indicates painting and lighting in accordance
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-304388A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-304388A1.txt
    • 105-29-29.4 W 0004587917 New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC GILLETTE 01/25/2011 06655.00000 44-14-38.6 N WY RM WMT668 105-29-29.4 W 0004587917 New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC GILLETTE 01/25/2011 06695.00000 44-14-38.6 N WY RM WMT668 105-29-29.4 W 0004587917 New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC GILLETTE 01/25/2011 10623.12500 44-14-38.6 N WY RM WMT669 104-14-35.3 W 0004587924 New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC NEW CASTLE 01/25/2011 06315.84000 43-52-00.5 N WY RM WMT669 104-14-35.3 W 0004587924 New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC NEW CASTLE 01/25/2011 06755.00000 43-52-00.5 N WY RM WMT669 104-14-35.3 W 0004587924 New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC NEW CASTLE 01/25/2011 06815.00000 43-52-00.5 N WY RM WMT669 104-14-35.3 W 0004587924 New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC NEW CASTLE 01/25/2011 11245.00000 43-52-00.5 N MT RM WPNC734 112-05-02.6 W 0004587928 New Cingular
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-304390A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-304390A1.txt
    • PR AM WPQN477 065-47-28.6 W 0004581251 PR Wireless, Inc. RIO GRANDE 01/27/2011 11687.50000 18-21-44.8 N PR AM WPQN477 065-47-28.6 W 0004581251 PR Wireless, Inc. RIO GRANDE 01/27/2011 17945.00000 18-21-44.8 N PR AM WPQN477 065-47-28.6 W 0004581251 PR Wireless, Inc. RIO GRANDE 01/27/2011 17970.00000 18-21-44.8 N VA MD WPNA981 079-03-07.1 W 0004585235 Alltel Communications of Virginia No. 1, LLAmherst 01/24/2011 06197.24000 37-35-00.5 N VA MD WPNA981 079-03-07.1 W 0004585235 Alltel Communications of Virginia No. 1, LLAmherst 01/24/2011 06256.54000 37-35-00.5 N VA MD WPNA981 079-03-07.1 W 0004585235 Alltel Communications of Virginia No. 1, LLAmherst 01/24/2011 06286.19000 37-35-00.5 N VA MD WPNA981 079-03-07.1 W 0004585235 Alltel Communications of Virginia No. 1, LLAmherst 01/24/2011 06345.49000 37-35-00.5 N VA MD WPNA981 079-03-07.1 W 0004585235 Alltel Communications
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-304516A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-304516A1.txt
    • - Cellular State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City WV MD KNKN567 077-52-05.4 W 0004525096 NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS PCS, LLCFALLING WATERS 12/07/2010 39-34-50.6 N WV MD KNKN567 079-28-22.2 W 0004525096 NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS PCS, LLCFRANKLIN 12/07/2010 38-30-10.4 N WV MD KNKN567 079-28-59.0 W 0004525096 NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS PCS, LLCFRANKLIN 12/07/2010 38-31-00.5 N WV MD KNKN567 079-20-46.4 W 0004525096 NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS PCS, LLCFRANKLIN 12/07/2010 38-38-08.0 N WV MD KNKN567 077-59-51.4 W 0004525096 NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS PCS, LLCHEDGESVILLE 12/07/2010 39-32-46.3 N WV MD KNKN567 077-45-36.8 W 0004525096 NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS PCS, LLCKearneysville 12/07/2010 39-19-34.8 N WV MD KNKN567 078-05-15.7 W 0004525096 NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS PCS, LLCMartinsburg 12/07/2010 39-25-17.3 N WV MD KNKN567
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-304517A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-304517A1.txt
    • 36-24-22.0 N NC MD WML585 078-20-32.0 W 0004602515 USCOC OF GREATER NORTH CAROLINHENDERSON 02/04/2011 06585.00000 36-24-22.0 N NC MD WML585 078-20-32.0 W 0004602515 USCOC OF GREATER NORTH CAROLINHENDERSON 02/04/2011 06595.00000 36-24-22.0 N NC MD WML585 078-20-32.0 W 0004602515 USCOC OF GREATER NORTH CAROLINHENDERSON 02/04/2011 06625.00000 36-24-22.0 N MA MD WPNG946 071-44-42.6 W 0004602516 NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS PCS, LLCSTERLING 02/04/2011 10621.25000 42-27-00.5 N NC MD WQKM451 078-19-49.8 W 0004602518 USCOC OF GREATER NORTH CAROLINEpsom 02/04/2011 06063.80000 36-14-40.7 N NC MD WQKM451 078-19-49.8 W 0004602518 USCOC OF GREATER NORTH CAROLINEpsom 02/04/2011 06256.54000 36-14-40.7 N NC MD WMQ795 078-19-22.0 W 0004602525 USCOC OF GREATER NORTH CAROLINLOUISBURG 02/04/2011 06197.24000 36-06-11.0 N NC MD WMQ795 078-19-22.0 W 0004602525 USCOC OF GREATER NORTH CAROLINLOUISBURG 02/04/2011 06286.19000 36-06-11.0
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-304520A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-304520A1.txt
    • 0004602443 State of New Jersey BARNEGAT 02/04/2011 06795.00000 39-45-28.4 N NJ MD WNEW479 074-14-04.5 W 0004602456 NEW JERSEY, STATE OF TOMS RIVER 02/04/2011 06256.54000 39-58-10.4 N NJ MD WNEW479 074-14-04.5 W 0004602456 NEW JERSEY, STATE OF TOMS RIVER 02/04/2011 06286.19000 39-58-10.4 N NJ MD WNEW472 074-48-38.6 W 0004602462 NEW JERSEY, STATE OF WOODBINE 02/04/2011 06034.15000 39-14-07.4 N NJ MD WNTY250 074-15-00.5 W 0004602465 NEW JERSEY, STATE OF Ringwood 02/04/2011 06315.84000 41-04-01.3 N MN MD WQIK926 095-33-19.5 W 0004602523 Minnesota, State of GRANITE FALLS 02/04/2011 06226.89000 44-53-43.0 N MN MD WQMI448 095-11-24.6 W 0004602530 Minnesota, State Renville 02/04/2011 05974.85000 44-51-41.7 N NJ MD WNEV773 074-54-14.0 W 0004602577 New Jersey, State of CHERRYVILLE 02/04/2011 06555.00000 40-33-16.0 N Page 9 MW - Microwave Public
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-304657A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-304657A1.txt
    • File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City CA MD WQMJ867 121-55-24.7 W 0004608486 AMFM BROADCASTING LICENSES, LLCSUNOL 02/09/2011 00947.50000 37-37-11.5 N Page 1 AS - Aural Studio Transmitter Link State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City HI MD WLO838 157-48-53.1 W 0004604270 HAWAII PUBLIC RADIO, INC. Honolulu 02/07/2011 00945.25000 21-20-00.5 N HI MD WHA900 157-50-22.2 W 0004604277 HAWAII PUBLIC RADIO, INC. Honolulu 02/07/2011 00944.50000 21-17-37.1 N HI MD WLI676 157-50-22.2 W 0004604278 HAWAII PUBLIC RADIO, INC. HONOLULU 02/07/2011 00949.50000 21-17-37.1 N HI MD WLI672 157-50-22.2 W 0004604280 HAWAII PUBLIC RADIO, INC. HONOLULU 02/07/2011 00946.35000 21-17-37.1 N NY MD WLJ713 078-28-31.0 W 0004606994 BACKYARD BROADCASTING OLEAN LIOLEAN 02/08/2011 00950.00000 42-04-39.2 N
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-304658A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-304658A1.txt
    • Yucca Valley 02/10/2011 06615.00000 34-09-11.6 N CA AM WQJE853 116-23-22.4 W 0004599002 Los Angeles SMSA Limited Partnership Yucca Valley 02/10/2011 10755.00000 34-09-11.6 N CA MD WQCC868 118-09-11.8 W 0004607705 Los Angeles SMSA Limited Partnership Bell Gardens 02/09/2011 10637.50000 33-58-06.2 N CA MD WQCC868 118-09-11.8 W 0004607705 Los Angeles SMSA Limited Partnership Bell Gardens 02/09/2011 11115.00000 33-58-06.2 N CA MD WPYU223 118-03-00.5 W 0004607706 Los Angeles SMSA Limited Partnership El Monte 02/09/2011 17865.00000 34-04-25.1 N CA MD WPYU223 118-03-00.5 W 0004607706 Los Angeles SMSA Limited Partnership El Monte 02/09/2011 17880.00000 34-04-25.1 N CA MD WPUA737 115-43-03.3 W 0004607707 Los Angeles SMSA Limited Partnership Desert Center 02/09/2011 06116.92300 33-39-40.1 N Page 2 CF - Common Carrier Fixed Point to Point Microwave State Purpose
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-304662A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-304662A1.txt
    • 39-58-10.4 N NJ MD WNEW472 074-48-38.6 W 0004608747 NEW JERSEY, STATE OF WOODBINE 02/09/2011 06034.15000 39-14-07.4 N Page 10 MW - Microwave Public Safety Pool State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City NJ MD WNEW472 074-48-38.6 W 0004608747 NEW JERSEY, STATE OF WOODBINE 02/09/2011 06755.00000 39-14-07.4 N NJ MD WNTY250 074-15-00.5 W 0004608748 NEW JERSEY, STATE OF Ringwood 02/09/2011 06315.84000 41-04-01.3 N NJ MD WNTY250 074-15-00.5 W 0004608748 NEW JERSEY, STATE OF Ringwood 02/09/2011 06685.00000 41-04-01.3 N NJ MD WPNC414 074-55-57.0 W 0004608753 NEW JERSEY, STATE OF BERLIN 02/09/2011 06152.75000 39-48-14.0 N NJ MD WPNC414 074-55-57.0 W 0004608753 NEW JERSEY, STATE OF BERLIN 02/09/2011 06825.00000 39-48-14.0 N NJ MD WPNC414 074-55-57.0
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-304911A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-304911A1.txt
    • 00450.73750 39-43-59.0 N CO AM KPF238 104-59-08.9 W 0004505743 CBS TELEVISION STATIONS INC. DENVER 02/24/2011 00455.73500 39-43-59.0 N TI - TV Intercity Relay State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City OH AM WQNJ590 081-27-09.1 W 0004522152 GRAY TELEVISION LICENSEE, LLC Marietta 02/23/2011 02037.50000 - 02049.50000 39-24-38.3 N SC MD WMV650 081-50-00.5 W 0004623635 WAGT TELEVISION, INC. JACKSON 02/22/2011 02085.50000 - 02097.50000 33-24-20.7 N SC MD WPXL631 081-50-00.5 W 0004623644 WAGT TELEVISION, INC. JACKSON 02/22/2011 06950.00000 - 06975.00000 33-24-20.7 N PA MD WPUW572 075-14-10.1 W 0004628915 UNIVISION PHILADELPHIA LLC Philadelphia 02/23/2011 06937.50000 40-02-30.0 N LA NE 090-05-38.0 W 0004629611 NEW ORLEANS HEARST TELEVISION Mandeville 02/24/2011 02097.50000 - 02109.50000 30-22-51.0 N Page 49
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-305045A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-305045A1.txt
    • WIRELESS PCS, LLCCHEYENNE 03/03/2011 35-41-55.7 N OK AM KNKN511 098-57-47.8 W 0004383340 NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS PCS, LLCCLINTON 03/03/2011 35-29-22.6 N OK AM KNKN511 098-57-49.0 W 0004383340 NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS PCS, LLCCLINTON 03/03/2011 35-29-24.0 N OK AM KNKN511 098-53-00.3 W 0004383340 NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS PCS, LLCCLINTON 03/03/2011 35-31-58.2 N OK AM KNKN511 098-53-01.6 W 0004383340 NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS PCS, LLCCLINTON 03/03/2011 35-32-00.5 N OK AM KNKN511 099-22-33.8 W 0004383340 NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS PCS, LLCHammon 03/03/2011 35-37-08.3 N OK AM KNKN511 097-54-16.1 W 0004383340 NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS PCS, LLCHENNESSEY 03/03/2011 36-05-43.2 N OK AM KNKN511 097-57-04.3 W 0004383340 NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS PCS, LLCKingfisher 03/03/2011 35-49-41.5 N Page 28 CL - Cellular State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-305046A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-305046A1.txt
    • and Electric Company Konawa 03/03/2011 06063.80000 34-58-23.0 N OK NE 096-43-39.0 W 0004639568 Oklahoma Gas and Electric Company Konawa 03/03/2011 06123.10000 34-58-23.0 N WA NE 121-06-44.6 W 0004639678 Sawtooth Technologies Dallesport 03/03/2011 19320.00000 45-42-44.2 N OR NE 121-07-13.2 W 0004639682 Sawtooth Technologies The Dalles 03/03/2011 17760.00000 45-36-26.4 N LA NE 090-04-15.3 W 0004640134 Wire Fly Communications New Orleans 03/04/2011 10835.00000 29-57-00.5 N LA NE 090-09-27.3 W 0004640135 Wire Fly Communications Metairie 03/04/2011 11325.00000 29-58-20.0 N OR NE P 122-59-03.6 W 0004641030 CITY OF BROWNSVILLE BROWNSVILLE 03/04/2011 00956.41875 44-23-35.4 N RO WPJE553 0004640149 Keyspan Corp. dba Keyspan Energy 03/04/2011 RO KSD88 0004640317 ANR Pipeline Company 03/04/2011 Page 22 MG - Microwave Industrial/Business Pool State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-305197A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-305197A1.txt
    • W 0004646278 NE Colorado Cellular, Inc. Clay Center 03/09/2011 06286.19000 40-31-40.2 N NE NE 098-04-42.9 W 0004646283 NE Colorado Cellular, Inc. Nelson 03/09/2011 06197.24000 40-11-52.2 N TX NE 093-54-48.4 W 0004647021 GTE Mobilnet of South Texas Limited PartVidor 03/10/2011 05945.20000 30-07-57.7 N TX NE 093-45-25.8 W 0004647026 GTE Mobilnet of South Texas Limited PartOrange 03/10/2011 06345.49000 30-10-45.2 N AZ NE 112-13-00.5 W 0004647193 airBand Communications, Inc. Peoria 03/10/2011 10825.00000 33-38-14.7 N IA NE 093-46-25.4 W 0004647199 airBand Communications, Inc. Urbandale 03/10/2011 23080.00000 41-38-15.0 N Page 11 CF - Common Carrier Fixed Point to Point Microwave State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City TX NE 094-10-14.7 W 0004647324 GTE Mobilnet of South
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-305296A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-305296A1.txt
    • Less than 768 kbps 83,173 7,053 6,683 96,909 At least 768 kbps & Less than 1.5 mbps 8,574 5,217 13,860 27,651 At least 1.5 mbps 740 1,366 26,254 28,360 Total 92,487 13,636 46,797 152,920 Percentages Less than 768 kbps 54.4 4.6 4.4 63.4 At least 768 kbps & Less than 1.5 mbps 5.6 3.4 9.1 18.1 At least 1.5 mbps 0.5 0.9 17.2 18.5 Total 60.5 8.9 30.6 100.0 Note: Figures may not sum to totals due to rounding. Source: FCC Form 477, Part I. U.S. Federal Communications Commission Internet Access Services: Status as of June 30, 2010 16 3 Chart 2 Distribution of Fixed Connections over 200 kbps in at Least One Direction as of June 30, 2010 Note: Inner
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-305552A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-305552A1.txt
    • 103-48-28.3 W 0004580849 NE Colorado Cellular, Inc. CEDAR POINT 03/29/2011 06635.00000 39-22-13.9 N CO AM WPNL477 103-48-28.3 W 0004580849 NE Colorado Cellular, Inc. CEDAR POINT 03/29/2011 06855.00000 39-22-13.9 N MT AM WMS659 109-25-33.5 W 0004581400 New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC LEWISTOWN 03/28/2011 06256.54000 47-03-56.8 N WY AM WMT669 104-14-35.3 W 0004587924 New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC NEW CASTLE 04/01/2011 06315.84000 43-52-00.5 N WY AM WMT669 104-14-35.3 W 0004587924 New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC NEW CASTLE 04/01/2011 06755.00000 43-52-00.5 N WY AM WMT669 104-14-35.3 W 0004587924 New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC NEW CASTLE 04/01/2011 06815.00000 43-52-00.5 N WY AM WMT669 104-14-35.3 W 0004587924 New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC NEW CASTLE 04/01/2011 11245.00000 43-52-00.5 N MN AM WPNI856 094-33-49.4 W 0004587968 New Cingular
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-305553A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-305553A1.txt
    • IIIAffton 03/30/2011 19575.00000 38-33-14.0 N MO MD WQLJ891 090-19-21.4 W 0004672279 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIAffton 03/30/2011 19675.00000 38-33-14.0 N MO MD WQLJ891 090-19-21.4 W 0004672279 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIAffton 03/30/2011 21875.00000 38-33-14.0 N MO MD WQLJ891 090-19-21.4 W 0004672279 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIAffton 03/30/2011 22025.00000 38-33-14.0 N MO MD WQLJ687 090-13-10.4 W 0004672281 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIISt. Louis 03/30/2011 10815.00000 38-39-00.5 N Page 26 MG - Microwave Industrial/Business Pool State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City MO MD WQLJ687 090-13-10.4 W 0004672281 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIISt. Louis 03/30/2011 10895.00000 38-39-00.5 N MO MD WQLJ687 090-13-10.4 W 0004672281 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIISt. Louis 03/30/2011 17965.00000 38-39-00.5 N MO MD WQLJ687 090-13-10.4 W
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-305718A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-305718A1.txt
    • 00951.50000 35-23-07.6 N CF - Common Carrier Fixed Point to Point Microwave State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City OR AM WQNF807 116-57-56.0 W 0004601423 RCC Minnesota, Inc. ONTARIO 04/07/2011 11245.00000 44-00-35.0 N OR AM WQNF807 116-57-56.0 W 0004601423 RCC Minnesota, Inc. ONTARIO 04/07/2011 11405.00000 44-00-35.0 N CA AM WPYU223 118-03-00.5 W 0004607706 Los Angeles SMSA Limited Partnership El Monte 04/08/2011 17865.00000 34-04-25.1 N Page 1 CF - Common Carrier Fixed Point to Point Microwave State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City CA AM WPYU223 118-03-00.5 W 0004607706 Los Angeles SMSA Limited Partnership El Monte 04/08/2011 17880.00000 34-04-25.1 N CA AM
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-306105A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-306105A1.txt
    • Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City PA MD WPNB888 076-32-49.5 W 0004697439 MONTROSE BROADCASTING CORP. MECHANICSVILLE 04/20/2011 00950.50000 40-59-16.1 N AS - Aural Studio Transmitter Link State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City HI AM WLO838 157-48-53.1 W 0004604270 HAWAII PUBLIC RADIO, INC. Honolulu 04/19/2011 00945.25000 21-20-00.5 N MO AM WLF812 090-13-33.5 W 0004679045 CBS RADIO HOLDINGS INC. ST LOUIS 04/18/2011 00950.50000 38-37-51.0 N CO MD WDZ697 104-50-13.4 W 0004696074 SALEM MEDIA OF COLORADO, INC AURORA 04/19/2011 00946.00000 39-39-38.0 N WI MD WPNF898 087-20-56.4 W 0004698485 NICOLET BROADCASTING, INC. Sturgeon Bay 04/20/2011 00951.00000 44-50-09.6 N WI MD WPUJ361 087-20-56.4 W 0004698493 NICOLET BROADCASTING, INC. Sturgeon Bay 04/20/2011
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-306419A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-306419A1.txt
    • PCS, LLCCircleville 05/06/2011 38-38-41.5 N VA AM KNKN567 078-46-06.0 W 0004525096 NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS PCS, LLCEdinburg 05/06/2011 38-48-36.4 N WV AM KNKN567 077-52-05.4 W 0004525096 NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS PCS, LLCFALLING WATERS 05/06/2011 39-34-50.6 N WV AM KNKN567 079-28-22.2 W 0004525096 NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS PCS, LLCFRANKLIN 05/06/2011 38-30-10.4 N WV AM KNKN567 079-28-59.0 W 0004525096 NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS PCS, LLCFRANKLIN 05/06/2011 38-31-00.5 N WV AM KNKN567 079-20-46.4 W 0004525096 NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS PCS, LLCFRANKLIN 05/06/2011 38-38-08.0 N WV AM KNKN567 077-59-51.4 W 0004525096 NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS PCS, LLCHEDGESVILLE 05/06/2011 39-32-46.3 N WV AM KNKN567 077-45-36.8 W 0004525096 NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS PCS, LLCKearneysville 05/06/2011 39-19-34.8 N WV AM KNKN567 078-05-15.7 W 0004525096 NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS PCS, LLCMartinsburg 05/06/2011 39-25-17.3 N WV AM KNKN567
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-306444A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-306444A1.txt
    • AND WJMN TELEVISION STATION, INC. FROM: Current Licensee: Nexstar Broadcasting, Inc. WFRV and WJMN Television Station, Inc. Application for Consent to Assignment Nexstar Broadcasting, Inc. E110012 SES-LIC-20110209-00132 E Class of Station: VSAT Network Application for Authority General Dynamics SATCOM Technologies Nature of Service: Fixed Satellite Service SITE ID: 1 2205 Fortune Dr., USA, San Jose, CA LOCATION: General Dynamics M20 0.5 meters ANTENNA ID: M20 47.36 dBW Digital Data 14000.0000 - 14500.0000 MHz 5M60G1D Digital Data 11700.0000 - 12200.0000 MHz 5M60G1D General Dynamics M17 0.43 meters ANTENNA ID: M17 Page 3 of 18 45.56 dBW Digital Data 14000.0000 - 14500.0000 MHz 5M60G1D Digital Data 11700.0000 - 12200.0000 MHz 5M60G1D General Dynamics M24 0.6 meters ANTENNA ID: M24 48.86 dBW Digital Data
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-306653A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-306653A1.txt
    • PR AM WPOV398 066-05-44.4 W 0004586908 PR Wireless, Inc. RIO PIEDRAS 05/11/2011 19565.00000 18-22-45.4 N PR AM WPOV398 066-05-44.4 W 0004586908 PR Wireless, Inc. RIO PIEDRAS 05/11/2011 19595.00000 18-22-45.4 N PR AM WPOV398 066-05-44.4 W 0004586908 PR Wireless, Inc. RIO PIEDRAS 05/11/2011 19665.00000 18-22-45.4 N WY AM WMT669 104-14-35.3 W 0004587924 New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC NEW CASTLE 05/12/2011 06315.84000 43-52-00.5 N WY AM WMT669 104-14-35.3 W 0004587924 New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC NEW CASTLE 05/12/2011 06745.00000 43-52-00.5 N WY AM WMT669 104-14-35.3 W 0004587924 New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC NEW CASTLE 05/12/2011 06755.00000 43-52-00.5 N WY AM WMT669 104-14-35.3 W 0004587924 New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC NEW CASTLE 05/12/2011 06815.00000 43-52-00.5 N WY AM WMT669 104-14-35.3 W 0004587924 New Cingular
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-306654A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-306654A1.txt
    • 06750.00000 36-28-36.5 N NC MD KDY58 077-48-38.9 W 0004726146 VIRGINIA ELECTRIC AND POWER COMTHELMA 05/12/2011 06226.89000 36-29-49.5 N NC MD KDY58 077-48-38.9 W 0004726146 VIRGINIA ELECTRIC AND POWER COMTHELMA 05/12/2011 06375.14000 36-29-49.5 N NC MD KDY58 077-48-38.9 W 0004726146 VIRGINIA ELECTRIC AND POWER COMTHELMA 05/12/2011 06590.00000 36-29-49.5 N TX MD WQKN521 101-37-01.5 W 0004726147 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIAmarillo 05/12/2011 11225.00000 35-13-00.5 N TX MD WQKN521 101-37-01.5 W 0004726147 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIAmarillo 05/12/2011 11265.00000 35-13-00.5 N TX MD WQIM893 101-23-49.7 W 0004726150 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS II PANHANDLE 05/12/2011 11325.00000 35-20-19.8 N TX MD WQIM893 101-23-49.7 W 0004726150 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS II PANHANDLE 05/12/2011 11465.00000 35-20-19.8 N Page 14 MG - Microwave Industrial/Business Pool State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-306814A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-306814A1.txt
    • HOLDINGS III, LLC 04/21/2011 Location Termination Pending Call Sign Termination Licensee Name Location Date # City Latitude State Longitude Frequency Termination Pending Call Sign Termination Date Stn Class Licensee Name Lower/Upper Frequency City Latitude State Longitude Loc./ Path ## Ant. IG - Industrial/Business Pool, Conventional Mobility Division 04/19/2011 WPHR951 FB2 WASHINGTON COUNTY BOARD OF EDUCATION 151.74500000 SANDERSVILL 33-0-24.4 N GA 82-49-0.5 W 4 1 04/19/2011 WPHR951 FB2 WASHINGTON COUNTY BOARD OF EDUCATION 452.12500000 SANDERSVILL 32-57-1.1 N GA 82-47-27.5 W 5 1 04/19/2011 WPHR951 FB2 WASHINGTON COUNTY BOARD OF EDUCATION 461.80000000 SANDERSVILL 32-57-1.1 N GA 82-47-27.5 W 5 1 04/19/2011 WPHR951 FB2 WASHINGTON COUNTY BOARD OF EDUCATION 151.89500000 SANDERSVILL 32-58-14.7 N GA 82-48-9.9 W 6 1 04/19/2011 WPHR951 MO WASHINGTON COUNTY BOARD
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-306818A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-306818A1.txt
    • DHHR BPH, Office of EMS, CommunMorgantown 05/20/2011 11245.00000 39-38-40.0 N WV NE 079-55-17.0 W 0004736852 WV DHHR BPH, Office of EMS, CommunMorgantown 05/20/2011 11365.00000 39-38-40.0 N WV NE 079-16-58.0 W 0004736854 WV DHHR BPH, Office of EMS, CommunFranklin 05/20/2011 10735.00000 38-40-18.1 N WV NE 079-16-58.0 W 0004736854 WV DHHR BPH, Office of EMS, CommunFranklin 05/20/2011 10995.00000 38-40-18.1 N WV NE 081-00-00.5 W 0004736855 WV DHHR BPH, Office of EMS, CommunPennsboro 05/20/2011 05945.20000 39-16-35.3 N WV NE 081-00-00.5 W 0004736855 WV DHHR BPH, Office of EMS, CommunPennsboro 05/20/2011 05974.85000 39-16-35.3 N WV NE 081-00-00.5 W 0004736855 WV DHHR BPH, Office of EMS, CommunPennsboro 05/20/2011 06004.50000 39-16-35.3 N WV NE 081-00-00.5 W 0004736855 WV DHHR BPH, Office of EMS, CommunPennsboro 05/20/2011 06034.15000 39-16-35.3
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-306921A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-306921A1.txt
    • WQMX925 095-05-40.3 W 0004740921 City of Houston DEER PARK 05/24/2011 06093.45000 29-42-53.0 N TX MD WQMX925 095-05-40.3 W 0004740921 City of Houston DEER PARK 05/24/2011 06615.00000 29-42-53.0 N TX MD WQMX925 095-05-40.3 W 0004740921 City of Houston DEER PARK 05/24/2011 06685.00000 29-42-53.0 N MN MD WQNA476 096-49-49.3 W 0004740953 Minnesota, State of Donaldson 05/24/2011 06655.00000 48-32-34.5 N MN MD WPWD820 096-39-00.5 W 0004740960 STATE OF MINNESOTA Angus 05/24/2011 06595.00000 48-02-02.7 N MN MD WQNB961 094-03-25.3 W 0004741625 Minnesota, State of Northhome 05/25/2011 05974.85000 48-00-47.2 N MN MD WQNB961 094-03-25.3 W 0004741625 Minnesota, State of Northhome 05/25/2011 06034.15000 48-00-47.2 N MN MD WQNB961 094-03-25.3 W 0004741625 Minnesota, State of Northhome 05/25/2011 06716.25000 48-00-47.2 N MO MD WQLF498 090-15-16.0 W 0004741717 CITY OF
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-307210A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-307210A1.txt
    • PR NE 067-14-32.5 W 0004749999 T-MOBILE PUERTO RICO LLC Rincon 06/02/2011 11265.00000 18-21-11.5 N PR NE 067-14-32.5 W 0004749999 T-MOBILE PUERTO RICO LLC Rincon 06/02/2011 11345.00000 18-21-11.5 N VA NE 078-57-18.1 W 0004750273 Virginia PCS Alliance, L.C. DEVILS KNOB 06/02/2011 06626.25000 37-54-59.4 N VA NE 079-18-51.0 W 0004750278 Virginia PCS Alliance, L.C. ELLIOTS KNOB 06/02/2011 06621.25000 38-09-53.9 N AK NE 150-02-00.5 W 0004750422 GCI Communication Corp Wasilla 06/02/2011 11055.00000 61-20-19.0 N AK NE 149-38-01.0 W 0004750442 GCI Communication Corp Wasilla 06/02/2011 11545.00000 61-30-57.0 N AZ NE 111-55-29.6 W 0004750732 airBand Communications, Inc. Scottsdale 06/02/2011 21880.00000 33-31-44.8 N AZ NE 111-58-49.7 W 0004750838 airBand Communications, Inc. Phoenix 06/02/2011 23230.00000 33-25-25.0 N TN NE 086-03-00.5 W 0004751232 Verizon Wireless Tennessee PartnershipManchester 06/03/2011 19360.00000
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-307212A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-307212A1.txt
    • Authority DUKES 06/03/2011 10855.00000 29-57-25.8 N FL NE 082-25-10.5 W 0004752237 North Florida Broadband Authority DUKES 06/03/2011 10895.00000 29-57-25.8 N FL NE 084-09-29.8 W 0004752239 North Florida Broadband Authority NEWPORT 06/03/2011 05945.20000 30-12-46.2 N FL NE 084-09-29.8 W 0004752239 North Florida Broadband Authority NEWPORT 06/03/2011 10735.00000 30-12-46.2 N FL NE 082-19-01.6 W 0004752241 North Florida Broadband Authority SANDERSON 06/03/2011 10735.00000 30-14-00.5 N FL NE 082-19-01.6 W 0004752241 North Florida Broadband Authority SANDERSON 06/03/2011 10855.00000 30-14-00.5 N FL NE 082-38-23.7 W 0004752242 North Florida Broadband Authority LEBANON STATION 06/03/2011 10735.00000 29-10-43.9 N FL NE 082-38-23.7 W 0004752242 North Florida Broadband Authority LEBANON STATION 06/03/2011 10855.00000 29-10-43.9 N FL NE 083-13-58.0 W 0004752243 North Florida Broadband Authority MAYO 06/03/2011 06197.24000 30-04-00.6 N FL
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-307315A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-307315A1.pdf
    • legally operate under FRS because it does not meet the technical regulations. The repeater, (1) was not certified for use under FRS, (2) employed an antenna that was not an integral part of the transmitter, and (3) was measured with a transmitter power output that, if connected to a no gain antenna, would produce an effective radiated power exceeding the 0.5 watt limit. (See 47 C.F.R. §§ 95.191, 95.193, 95.603, 95.639(d), and 95.647). The frequency 462.5875 MHz is also available for use under the General Mobile Radio Service (``GMRS''). GMRS is a land mobile radio service available to persons for short-distance two-way communications to facilitate the activities of licensees and their immediate family members. The Irvine Company does not hold a
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-307527A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-307527A1.txt
    • 33-39-23.4 N PR NE 067-08-35.0 W 0004757326 T-MOBILE PUERTO RICO LLC Anasco 06/08/2011 10735.00000 18-17-15.2 N PR NE 066-41-58.6 W 0004757327 T-MOBILE PUERTO RICO LLC Pe?uelas 06/08/2011 10855.00000 17-58-45.4 N AL NE 087-02-39.1 W 0004757328 Conterra Ultra Broadband LLC MCCALLA 06/08/2011 06004.50000 33-19-07.7 N AL NE 087-09-44.3 W 0004757329 Conterra Ultra Broadband LLC Woodstock 06/08/2011 06256.54000 33-12-40.1 N OK NE 095-57-00.5 W 0004757849 Conterra Ultra Broadband LLC Tulsa 06/09/2011 10875.00000 36-11-28.2 N OK NE 095-57-00.5 W 0004757849 Conterra Ultra Broadband LLC Tulsa 06/09/2011 10915.00000 36-11-28.2 N OK NE 095-57-00.5 W 0004757849 Conterra Ultra Broadband LLC Tulsa 06/09/2011 10955.00000 36-11-28.2 N OK NE 095-55-00.1 W 0004757856 Conterra Ultra Broadband LLC Bartlesville 06/09/2011 10915.00000 36-45-50.0 N OK NE 095-59-51.1 W 0004757864 Conterra Ultra
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-307529A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-307529A1.txt
    • N MS MD WQMK337 090-44-46.4 W 0004760453 State of Mississippi Wireless CommunicatVicksburg 06/10/2011 06630.62500 32-26-54.2 N MS MD WQMK337 090-44-46.4 W 0004760453 State of Mississippi Wireless CommunicatVicksburg 06/10/2011 06655.00000 32-26-54.2 N MS MD WQMK337 090-44-46.4 W 0004760453 State of Mississippi Wireless CommunicatVicksburg 06/10/2011 06695.00000 32-26-54.2 N MS MD WQMK340 090-23-16.7 W 0004760454 State of Mississippi Wireless CommunicatYazoo City 06/10/2011 06541.25000 32-50-00.5 N MS MD WQMK340 090-23-16.7 W 0004760454 State of Mississippi Wireless CommunicatYazoo City 06/10/2011 06625.62500 32-50-00.5 N MS MD WQMK340 090-23-16.7 W 0004760454 State of Mississippi Wireless CommunicatYazoo City 06/10/2011 06685.00000 32-50-00.5 N MS MD WQKJ857 090-15-48.6 W 0004760455 State of Mississippi Wireless CommunicatByram 06/10/2011 06548.75000 32-10-15.4 N MS MD WQKJ857 090-15-48.6 W 0004760455 State of Mississippi Wireless CommunicatByram 06/10/2011
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-307556A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-307556A1.txt
    • 05/12/2011 WQJE336 FXO CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS II LLC 19375.00000000 MATTHEWS 35-7-12.0 N NC 80-42-5.4 W 4 1 05/12/2011 WQJE336 FXO CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS II LLC 19475.00000000 MATTHEWS 35-7-12.0 N NC 80-42-5.4 W 4 1 05/10/2011 WQKF471 FXO AirCanopy Internet Services 19325.00000000 MIDLOTHIAN 32-30-46.4 N TX 96-58-34.6 W 4 1 05/10/2011 WQKH408 FXO AirCanopy Internet Services 11345.00000000 Waxahachie 32-26-23.9 N TX 96-51-0.5 W 3 1 05/09/2011 WQKQ443 FXO CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS III, LLC 11225.00000000 WEST CHICAG 41-55-5.2 N IL 88-14-8.6 W 2 1 05/09/2011 WQKQ443 FXO CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS III, LLC 11305.00000000 WEST CHICAG 41-55-5.2 N IL 88-14-8.6 W 2 1 05/06/2011 WQKQ444 FXO CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS III, LLC 18065.00000000 Lake Forest 42-12-48.8 N IL 87-50-33.6 W 2 1 05/06/2011 WQKQ444 FXO
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-307787A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-307787A1.txt
    • N CA AM WHC945 117-32-46.2 W 0004743657 LOS ANGELES SMSA LIMITED PARTNECORONA 06/14/2011 11605.00000 33-51-38.1 N OR AM WQJW381 123-16-58.8 W 0004750452 Cellco Partnership GRANTS PASS 06/14/2011 06745.00000 42-24-41.4 N OR AM WQJW381 123-16-58.8 W 0004750452 Cellco Partnership GRANTS PASS 06/14/2011 10572.50000 42-24-41.4 N OR AM WQJW381 123-16-58.8 W 0004750452 Cellco Partnership GRANTS PASS 06/14/2011 11365.00000 42-24-41.4 N OK AM 095-57-00.5 W 0004757849 Conterra Ultra Broadband LLC Tulsa 06/13/2011 10875.00000 36-11-28.2 N OK AM 095-57-00.5 W 0004757849 Conterra Ultra Broadband LLC Tulsa 06/13/2011 10915.00000 36-11-28.2 N OK AM 095-57-00.5 W 0004757849 Conterra Ultra Broadband LLC Tulsa 06/13/2011 10955.00000 36-11-28.2 N CA MD WQCT372 120-14-54.4 W 0004760819 Sacramento Valley Limited Partnership Tahoe City 06/10/2011 06605.00000 39-09-00.6 N Page 7 CF - Common
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-308078A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-308078A1.txt
    • 06/24/2011 38-19-07.3 N KY MD KNKA773 083-13-59.6 W 0004779669 NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS PCS, LLCOlive Hill 06/24/2011 38-20-17.2 N WV MD KNKA773 082-35-47.1 W 0004779669 NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS PCS, LLCPrichard 06/24/2011 38-11-50.7 N WV MD KNKA773 082-13-42.1 W 0004779669 NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS PCS, LLCSalt Road 06/24/2011 38-18-43.6 N KY MD KNKA773 082-53-28.9 W 0004779669 NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS PCS, LLCSouth Shore 06/24/2011 38-43-00.5 N Page 29 CL - Cellular State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City AR MD KNKN753 091-12-34.3 W 0004779687 NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS PCS, LLCBrinkley 06/24/2011 34-54-17.1 N AR MD KNKN753 091-15-13.5 W 0004779687 NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS PCS, LLCBRINKLEY 06/24/2011 34-50-48.7 N AR MD KNKN753 090-48-21.3 W 0004779687 NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-308225A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-308225A1.txt
    • Wireless CommunicatPenalty 06/27/2011 06286.19000 32-08-14.0 N MS NE 089-05-34.4 W 0004781988 State of Mississippi Wireless CommunicatPenalty 06/27/2011 06315.84000 32-08-14.0 N MS NE 089-05-34.4 W 0004781988 State of Mississippi Wireless CommunicatPenalty 06/27/2011 06375.14000 32-08-14.0 N MS NE 089-05-34.4 W 0004781988 State of Mississippi Wireless CommunicatPenalty 06/27/2011 06635.00000 32-08-14.0 N MS NE 089-19-44.5 W 0004781992 State of Mississippi Wireless CommunicatPhiladelphia 06/27/2011 06226.89000 32-55-00.5 N MS NE 089-19-44.5 W 0004781992 State of Mississippi Wireless CommunicatPhiladelphia 06/27/2011 06286.19000 32-55-00.5 N MS NE 089-19-44.5 W 0004781992 State of Mississippi Wireless CommunicatPhiladelphia 06/27/2011 06315.84000 32-55-00.5 N MS NE 089-19-44.5 W 0004781992 State of Mississippi Wireless CommunicatPhiladelphia 06/27/2011 06375.14000 32-55-00.5 N MS NE 089-41-31.4 W 0004781994 State of Mississippi Wireless CommunicatMcAdams 06/27/2011 06197.24000 33-02-05.2 N MS NE 089-41-31.4
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-308234A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-308234A1.txt
    • N NJ 74-57-0.3 W 1 1 06/01/2011 WQLC284 FXO TELECOM TRANSPORT MANAGEMENT, INC. 23080.00000000 SICKLERVILLE 39-46-24.2 N NJ 75-2-29.0 W 2 1 Page 3 Frequency Termination Pending Call Sign Termination Date Stn Class Licensee Name Lower/Upper Frequency City Latitude State Longitude Loc./ Path ## Ant. IG - Industrial/Business Pool, Conventional Mobility Division 06/01/2011 WNYZ414 FB2 SEARS LOGISTIC SERVICES 461.63750000 GARLAND 32-54-0.5 N TX 97-2-1.0 W 2 1 06/01/2011 WNYZ414 MO SEARS LOGISTIC SERVICES 461.63750000 -- -- 3 1 06/01/2011 WNYZ414 MO SEARS LOGISTIC SERVICES 466.63750000 -- -- 3 1 06/01/2011 WPLF495 MO SALEM BAPTIST CHRISTIAN SCHOOL 462.31250000 WINSTON SAL 36-5-18.5 N NC 80-14-56.2 W 1 1 06/01/2011 WPLF495 MO SALEM BAPTIST CHRISTIAN SCHOOL 462.41250000 WINSTON SAL 36-5-18.5 N NC 80-14-56.2 W
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-308346A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-308346A1.txt
    • Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City OR MD WPNA806 122-37-48.3 W 0004789916 PACIFICORP Stayton 07/05/2011 00954.35000 44-45-46.4 N WY MD WNTA926 107-55-50.2 W 0004789932 PACIFICORP JEFFERY CITY 07/05/2011 00957.15000 42-12-18.8 N NY MD WNTR470 073-59-44.5 W 0004790142 NEW YORK UNIVERSITY NEW YORK 07/05/2011 17700.00000 - 18300.00000 40-43-46.3 N NY MD WNTV908 074-00-00.5 W 0004790159 NEW YORK UNIVERSITY NEW YORK 07/05/2011 17700.00000 - 18300.00000 40-43-48.3 N NY MD WNTV904 073-59-30.5 W 0004790179 NEW YORK UNIVERSITY NEW YORK 07/05/2011 17700.00000 - 18300.00000 40-43-56.3 N WA MD WQFW364 122-12-29.3 W 0004790184 Clearwire Spectrum Holdings II, LLC Everett 07/05/2011 17815.00000 47-58-53.8 N WA MD WQFW364 122-12-29.3 W 0004790184 Clearwire Spectrum Holdings II, LLC Everett 07/05/2011 17915.00000
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-308348A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-308348A1.txt
    • WATER CONSERVMARANA 07/07/2011 10578.75000 32-23-12.0 N AZ RM WNEW719 111-11-54.4 W 0004793452 CENTRAL ARIZONA WATER CONSERVMARANA 07/07/2011 11178.12500 32-23-12.0 N AZ RM WNEV925 110-59-34.5 W 0004794660 CENTRAL ARIZONA WATER CONSERVTUCSON 07/07/2011 11148.75000 31-59-58.7 N AZ RM WNEV925 110-59-34.5 W 0004794660 CENTRAL ARIZONA WATER CONSERVTUCSON 07/07/2011 11163.12500 31-59-58.7 N AZ RM WNEF378 112-04-06.2 W 0004794682 CENTRAL ARIZONA WATER CONSERVPHOENIX 07/07/2011 06034.15000 33-42-00.5 N AZ RM WNEF378 112-04-06.2 W 0004794682 CENTRAL ARIZONA WATER CONSERVPHOENIX 07/07/2011 06595.00000 33-42-00.5 N AZ RM WNEF378 112-04-06.2 W 0004794682 CENTRAL ARIZONA WATER CONSERVPHOENIX 07/07/2011 06805.00000 33-42-00.5 N AZ RM WNEF378 112-04-06.2 W 0004794682 CENTRAL ARIZONA WATER CONSERVPHOENIX 07/07/2011 06815.00000 33-42-00.5 N AZ RM WNEF378 112-04-06.2 W 0004794682 CENTRAL ARIZONA WATER CONSERVPHOENIX 07/07/2011 11245.00000 33-42-00.5 N AZ RM WNEV926
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-308473A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-308473A1.txt
    • SMSA Limited Partnership Moorpark 07/15/2011 19675.00000 34-15-37.8 N WA NE 122-08-02.0 W 0004803587 Accel Net, Inc. Bellevue 07/15/2011 19600.00000 47-34-52.0 N ME NE 069-04-46.3 W 0004803647 BANGOR CELLULAR TELEPHONE, L.P.Dixmont 07/15/2011 05945.20000 44-42-08.0 N TX NE 101-50-01.5 W 0004803700 AMA Communications, LLC Amarillo 07/15/2011 17960.00000 35-12-24.6 N CA NE 117-12-09.0 W 0004804229 NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS PCS, LLCAPPLE VALLEY 07/15/2011 11215.00000 34-42-00.5 N RO WPTA534 0004801682 Matanuska Telephone Association, Inc. 07/13/2011 RO WPTJ344 0004801878 Alltel Communications Southwest Holding 07/14/2011 RO WIL94 0004802029 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COM 07/14/2011 RO WPTE928 0004804564 NEXTEL OF CALIFORNIA, INC. 07/15/2011 RO WPTF234 0004804565 NEXTEL OF CALIFORNIA, INC. 07/15/2011 RO WPTF795 0004804761 SprintCom, Inc. 07/15/2011 RO WPTF796 0004804762 SprintCom, Inc. 07/15/2011 RO WPTG784 0004804763 SprintCom, Inc. 07/15/2011 RO
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-308627A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-308627A1.txt
    • CommunicatMidway 07/21/2011 06063.80000 31-46-57.8 N GA NE 081-26-26.7 W 0004810506 Liberty County Public Safety CommunicatMidway 07/21/2011 06093.45000 31-46-57.8 N GA NE 081-26-26.7 W 0004810506 Liberty County Public Safety CommunicatMidway 07/21/2011 06123.10000 31-46-57.8 N GA NE 081-26-26.7 W 0004810506 Liberty County Public Safety CommunicatMidway 07/21/2011 06152.75000 31-46-57.8 N GA NE 081-14-32.0 W 0004810512 Liberty County Public Safety CommunicatRICHMOND HILL 07/21/2011 06345.49000 31-53-00.5 N GA NE 081-14-32.0 W 0004810512 Liberty County Public Safety CommunicatRICHMOND HILL 07/21/2011 06404.79000 31-53-00.5 N PA NE P 077-41-12.0 W 0004810898 PENNSYLVANIA, COMMOMWEALTH OFTOWN OF CENTRE 07/21/2011 06437.50000 40-50-47.0 N PA NE P 077-41-12.0 W 0004810898 PENNSYLVANIA, COMMOMWEALTH OFTOWN OF CENTRE 07/21/2011 06462.50000 40-50-47.0 N PA NE P 077-41-12.0 W 0004810898 PENNSYLVANIA, COMMOMWEALTH OFTOWN OF CENTRE 07/21/2011 06487.50000 40-50-47.0
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-308828A2.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-308828A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-308828A2.txt
    • 858 MB at 10Mbps 357 MB at 3Mbps 129 MB at 1.5Mbps 1 on-net test node Fixed 30 seconds*** 4.5 GB at 50Mbps 1.72 GB at 20Mbps 858 MB at 10Mbps 357 MB at 3Mbps 129 MB at 1.5Mbps Upload speed2, 3 1 off-net test node Fixed 30 seconds*** 174 MB at 2Mbps 87 MB at 1Mbps 44 MB at 0.5Mbps 1 on-net test node Fixed 30 seconds*** 174 MB at 2Mbps 87 MB at 1Mbps 44 MB at 0.5Mbps UDP latency 1 off-net test node Permanent 1 MB 1 on-net test node Permanent 1 MB UDP packet loss 1 off-net test node Permanent N/A (uses above) 1 on-net test node Permanent N/A (uses above) Consumption N/A N/A N/A Availability 3
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-309269A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-309269A1.txt
    • OF CONNECTICUT LP Application for Consent to Assignment CABLEVISION OF LITCHFIELD, INC. Page 1 of 24 E110012 SES-LIC-20110209-00132 E Date Effective: 08/22/2011 Class of Station: VSAT Network Grant of Authority 08/22/2011 - 08/22/2026 Application for Authority General Dynamics SATCOM Technologies Nature of Service: Fixed Satellite Service SITE ID: 1 2205 Fortune Dr., USA, San Jose, CA LOCATION: General Dynamics M20 0.5 meters ANTENNA ID: M20 47.36 dBW Digital Data 14000.0000 - 14500.0000 MHz 5M60G1D Digital Data 11700.0000 - 12200.0000 MHz 5M60G1D General Dynamics M17 0.43 meters ANTENNA ID: M17 45.56 dBW Digital Data 14000.0000 - 14500.0000 MHz 5M60G1D Digital Data 11700.0000 - 12200.0000 MHz 5M60G1D General Dynamics M24 0.6 meters ANTENNA ID: M24 48.86 dBW Digital Data 14000.0000 - 14500.0000 MHz
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-309335A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-309335A1.txt
    • N PA MD WPSJ867 076-35-51.8 W 0004853417 Commonwealth of Pennsylvania MILLVILLE 08/25/2011 06815.00000 41-08-49.3 N PA MD WPSJ866 076-57-22.8 W 0004853418 Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Williamsport 08/25/2011 06555.00000 41-12-32.0 N PA MD WPSJ866 076-57-22.8 W 0004853418 Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Williamsport 08/25/2011 06615.00000 41-12-32.0 N PA MD WPSJ866 076-57-22.8 W 0004853418 Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Williamsport 08/25/2011 06705.00000 41-12-32.0 N MN MD WPWD820 096-39-00.5 W 0004853807 STATE OF MINNESOTA Angus 08/26/2011 06655.00000 48-02-02.7 N MN MD WQMQ295 096-19-56.3 W 0004853832 Minnesota, State of Red Lake Falls 08/26/2011 06815.00000 47-56-05.0 N MN MD WQMQ276 096-01-27.8 W 0004853858 Minnesota, State of Audubon 08/26/2011 10715.00000 46-45-34.5 N MN MD WQMQ276 096-01-27.8 W 0004853858 Minnesota, State of Audubon 08/26/2011 10915.00000 46-45-34.5 N MN MD WQNC824 094-18-50.8 W 0004853967
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-309561A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-309561A1.txt
    • ESD Moro 09/08/2011 11225.00000 45-28-57.2 N OR AM 120-43-47.1 W 0004821199 North Central ESD Moro 09/08/2011 17785.00000 45-28-57.2 N OR AM 120-44-29.5 W 0004821266 North Central ESD Moro 09/08/2011 19345.00000 45-28-25.8 N Page 2 MW - Microwave Public Safety Pool State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City MN AM WPWD820 096-39-00.5 W 0004853807 STATE OF MINNESOTA Angus 09/06/2011 06608.75000 48-02-02.7 N MN AM WPWD820 096-39-00.5 W 0004853807 STATE OF MINNESOTA Angus 09/06/2011 06655.00000 48-02-02.7 N MN AM WQGF212 091-50-00.0 W 0004862976 Minnesota, State of Duluth 09/06/2011 06286.19000 47-01-10.0 N MN AM WQGF212 091-50-00.0 W 0004862976 Minnesota, State of Duluth 09/06/2011 06315.84000 47-01-10.0 N MN AM WQGF212 091-50-00.0 W 0004862976 Minnesota, State
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-309744A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-309744A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-309744A1.txt
    • 98 % 50 % (75%) 0 % (50%) Bandwidth required 2 x 10 Mbps 2 x 10 Mbps 2 x 100 Mbps PSAPs upgraded with dual fiber access 55 % 75 % 100 % PSAPs that incur special construction costs for installing new or upgrading existing fiber 45 % 40 % 30 % Non-recurring cost (NRC) for network access ($M) 0.5 ... 0.75 0.75...1.5 1.5...3.0 Monthly cost for fiber lease 2 x $1,150 2 x $1,150 2 x $8,750 NRC for hosting services $10,000 $25,000 $50,000 Monthly recurring charge (MRC) for hosting services $1,200 $1,200 $1,200 Figure 9 - Key Assumptions Bandwidth Requirements Each call taker can be active on one call at a time, for either voice combined with video
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-309881A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-309881A1.txt
    • W 0004879780 T-MOBILE LICENSE LLC Ocala 09/19/2011 06226.89000 29-13-28.3 N FL NE 082-16-39.4 W 0004879780 T-MOBILE LICENSE LLC Ocala 09/19/2011 06286.19000 29-13-28.3 N FL NE 082-16-39.4 W 0004879780 T-MOBILE LICENSE LLC Ocala 09/19/2011 06345.49000 29-13-28.3 N FL NE 082-16-39.4 W 0004879780 T-MOBILE LICENSE LLC Ocala 09/19/2011 06375.14000 29-13-28.3 N FL NE 082-11-23.6 W 0004879781 T-MOBILE LICENSE LLC Ocala 09/19/2011 11305.00000 29-01-00.5 N FL NE 082-11-23.6 W 0004879781 T-MOBILE LICENSE LLC Ocala 09/19/2011 11425.00000 29-01-00.5 N FL NE 081-15-33.5 W 0004879782 T-MOBILE LICENSE LLC SAINT CLOUD 09/19/2011 06004.50000 28-14-29.2 N FL NE 081-15-33.5 W 0004879782 T-MOBILE LICENSE LLC SAINT CLOUD 09/19/2011 06034.15000 28-14-29.2 N FL NE 082-26-40.8 W 0004879783 T-MOBILE LICENSE LLC PARRISH 09/19/2011 05945.20000 27-34-54.9 N FL NE 082-26-40.8 W 0004879783
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-309884A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-309884A1.txt
    • 19570.00000 33-54-16.0 N CA MD WLT431 118-02-27.0 W 0004885794 Los Angeles SMSA Limited Partnership Santa Fe Springs 09/23/2011 19600.00000 33-54-16.0 N CA MD WLT431 118-02-27.0 W 0004885794 Los Angeles SMSA Limited Partnership Santa Fe Springs 09/23/2011 19640.00000 33-54-16.0 N CA MD WLT431 118-02-27.0 W 0004885794 Los Angeles SMSA Limited Partnership Santa Fe Springs 09/23/2011 19690.00000 33-54-16.0 N AZ MD WMR827 112-07-00.5 W 0004885795 Verizon Wireless (VAW) LLC COTTONWOOD 09/23/2011 05945.20000 34-42-06.0 N AZ MD WMR827 112-07-00.5 W 0004885795 Verizon Wireless (VAW) LLC COTTONWOOD 09/23/2011 06123.10000 34-42-06.0 N AZ MD WMR827 112-07-00.5 W 0004885795 Verizon Wireless (VAW) LLC COTTONWOOD 09/23/2011 10715.00000 34-42-06.0 N AZ MD WMR827 112-07-00.5 W 0004885795 Verizon Wireless (VAW) LLC COTTONWOOD 09/23/2011 10795.00000 34-42-06.0 N AZ MD WMR827 112-07-00.5
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-310160A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-310160A1.txt
    • PARTNERSHIP, G.P. SACRAMENTO 09/26/2011 07025.00000 - 07050.00000 38-36-17.4 N NY MD WPQN956 073-40-28.0 W 0004891467 HEARST STATIONS INC. PEASLEVILLE 09/28/2011 07100.00000 - 07125.00000 44-34-28.0 N NY MD KEF93 073-26-30.5 W 0004891479 HEARST STATIONS INC. Plattsburgh 09/28/2011 06875.00000 - 06900.00000 44-43-32.0 N NY MD WPQR758 073-26-30.5 W 0004891498 HEARST STATIONS INC. PLATTSBURGH 09/28/2011 06925.00000 - 06950.00000 44-43-32.0 N SC MD WPQR551 081-50-00.5 W 0004891500 MEDIA GENERAL COMMUNICATIONS HBeech Island 09/28/2011 07062.50000 33-24-20.7 N SC MD WPQR549 081-50-00.0 W 0004891504 MEDIA GENERAL COMMUNICATIONS HBeech Island 09/28/2011 07112.50000 33-24-20.7 N AL MD WPNM981 086-25-09.9 W 0004891867 ALABAMA EDUCATIONAL TELEVISION BRANCHVILLE 09/28/2011 07100.00000 - 07125.00000 33-36-20.4 N TP - TV Pickup State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-310162A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-310162A1.txt
    • CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIINew Haven 09/29/2011 22025.00000 41-17-24.7 N Page 10 MG - Microwave Industrial/Business Pool State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City CT MD WQNB858 072-53-43.1 W 0004893218 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIINew Haven 09/29/2011 22075.00000 41-17-24.7 N CT MD WQNF575 072-49-10.9 W 0004893219 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIBranford 09/29/2011 19575.00000 41-19-00.5 N CT MD WQNF575 072-49-10.9 W 0004893219 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIBranford 09/29/2011 19675.00000 41-19-00.5 N CT MD WQNF575 072-49-10.9 W 0004893219 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIBranford 09/29/2011 23025.00000 41-19-00.5 N CT MD WQNF575 072-49-10.9 W 0004893219 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIBranford 09/29/2011 23125.00000 41-19-00.5 N MA MD WQMC397 071-02-07.0 W 0004893220 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIMalden 09/29/2011 19375.00000 42-26-10.8 N MA MD WQMC397
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-310261A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-310261A1.txt
    • Less than 768 kbps 81,125 7,980 7,278 96,383 At least 768 kbps & Less than 1.5 mbps 15,983 7,776 16,752 40,511 At least 1.5 mbps 764 1,431 29,790 31,986 Total 97,873 17,187 53,820 168,879 Percentages Less than 768 kbps 48.0 4.7 4.3 57.1 At least 768 kbps & Less than 1.5 mbps 9.5 4.6 9.9 24.0 At least 1.5 mbps 0.5 0.8 17.6 18.9 Total 58.0 10.2 31.9 100.0 Note: Figures may not sum to totals due to rounding. Source: FCC Form 477, Part I. U.S. Federal Communications Commission Internet Access Services: Status as of December 31, 2010 17 3 Chart 2 Distribution of Fixed Connections over 200 kbps in at Least One Direction as of December 31, 2010 Note: Inner
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-310317A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-310317A1.txt
    • Newport Coast 10/04/2011 17845.00000 33-36-20.1 N CA MD WMS518 117-48-43.2 W 0004899798 Los Angeles SMSA Limited Partnership Newport Coast 10/04/2011 17885.00000 33-36-20.1 N CA MD WMS518 117-48-43.2 W 0004899798 Los Angeles SMSA Limited Partnership Newport Coast 10/04/2011 17895.00000 33-36-20.1 N CA MD WMS518 117-48-43.2 W 0004899798 Los Angeles SMSA Limited Partnership Newport Coast 10/04/2011 17965.00000 33-36-20.1 N OK MD WQOC259 095-57-00.5 W 0004899800 Conterra Ultra Broadband LLC Tulsa 10/04/2011 10875.00000 36-11-28.2 N OK MD WQOC259 095-57-00.5 W 0004899800 Conterra Ultra Broadband LLC Tulsa 10/04/2011 10915.00000 36-11-28.2 N OK MD WQOC259 095-57-00.5 W 0004899800 Conterra Ultra Broadband LLC Tulsa 10/04/2011 10955.00000 36-11-28.2 N OK MD WQOB855 095-59-58.1 W 0004899801 Conterra Ultra Broadband LLC Skiatook 10/04/2011 11365.00000 36-22-03.7 N WY MD WMN229 110-04-28.7
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-310319A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-310319A1.txt
    • 081-53-16.5 W 0004902376 Hardee County - IDA Ona 10/05/2011 11585.00000 27-25-30.3 N FL MD WQMC905 081-59-07.5 W 0004902377 Hardee County - IDA Ona 10/05/2011 11225.00000 27-27-32.4 N FL MD WQMC905 081-59-07.5 W 0004902377 Hardee County - IDA Ona 10/05/2011 11265.00000 27-27-32.4 N FL MD WQMC905 081-59-07.5 W 0004902377 Hardee County - IDA Ona 10/05/2011 11425.00000 27-27-32.4 N FL MD WQNF320 081-54-00.5 W 0004902378 Hardee County - IDA Wauchula 10/05/2011 10775.00000 27-31-34.2 N FL MD WQNF320 081-54-00.5 W 0004902378 Hardee County - IDA Wauchula 10/05/2011 10975.00000 27-31-34.2 N FL MD WQNF320 081-54-00.5 W 0004902378 Hardee County - IDA Wauchula 10/05/2011 11385.00000 27-31-34.2 N FL MD WQNF320 081-54-00.5 W 0004902378 Hardee County - IDA Wauchula 10/05/2011 11425.00000 27-31-34.2 N FL MD WQNF320 081-54-00.5
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-310475A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-310475A1.txt
    • SPECTRUM HOLDINGS III, LLC 19625.00000000 Austin 30-13-53.3 N TX 97-48-6.1 W 3 1 09/11/2011 WQLM911 FXO CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS III, LLC 19375.00000000 Austin 30-13-53.3 N TX 97-48-6.1 W 4 1 09/11/2011 WQLM911 FXO CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS III, LLC 19475.00000000 Austin 30-13-53.3 N TX 97-48-6.1 W 4 1 09/11/2011 WQLM912 FXO CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS III, LLC 17965.00000000 Austin 30-15-9.4 N TX 97-48-0.5 W 1 1 09/11/2011 WQLM912 FXO CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS III, LLC 18065.00000000 Austin 30-15-9.4 N TX 97-48-0.5 W 1 1 09/11/2011 WQLM912 FXO CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS III, LLC 17815.00000000 Austin 30-15-9.4 N TX 97-48-0.5 W 2 1 09/11/2011 WQLM912 FXO CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS III, LLC 17915.00000000 Austin 30-15-9.4 N TX 97-48-0.5 W 2 1 09/11/2011 WQLM913 FXO CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-310781A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-310781A1.txt
    • WQFL562 117-20-29.2 W 0004924494 T-MOBILE LICENSE LLC Camp Pendleton 10/24/2011 17760.00000 33-19-05.3 N CA MD WQFL562 117-20-29.2 W 0004924494 T-MOBILE LICENSE LLC Camp Pendleton 10/24/2011 17855.00000 33-19-05.3 N VI MD WQBK439 064-56-38.6 W 0004924505 CHOICE COMMUNICATIONS, LLC St. Thomas 10/24/2011 19440.00000 18-21-15.2 N TX MD WQGK214 097-06-02.1 W 0004924535 AirCanopy Internet Services Itasca 10/24/2011 10815.00000 32-09-54.2 N TX MD WQKH408 096-51-00.5 W 0004924553 AirCanopy Internet Services Waxahachie 10/24/2011 11385.00000 32-26-23.9 N Page 6 CF - Common Carrier Fixed Point to Point Microwave State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City TX MD WQID407 096-46-54.0 W 0004924566 AirCanopy Internet Services Red Oak 10/24/2011 10855.00000 32-31-54.7 N TX MD WQOB372 096-50-29.0 W 0004924713 AirCanopy
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-310829A1.pdf
    • A T U R E O F A P P L I C A T I O N FILE NUMBER STATE E/P 10/14/2011 Actions of: TELEVISION APPLICATIONS FOR ORIGINAL CONSTRUCTION PERMIT DISMISSED , BILLINGS CHAN-14 P MT CP FOR A NEW TELEVISION STATION TO SERVE BILLINGS, MT; CH-14; TL: 8 MI E OF BILLINGS, MT AT QUARRY OFF HOGAN RD, 0.5 MILES FROM I-90 (YELLOWSTONE CO), BILLINGS, MT; (45-48-26 108-20-25); ERP(VIS): 1700 KW; HAAT: 729 FT/422 METERS; ANT: ANDREW, ATW30H2H STEVEN K. BRUGGEMAN 970331LV 86641 BPCT-19970331LV MT , BILLINGS CHAN-14 P MT CP FOR A NEW TELEVISION STATION TO SERVE BILLINGS, MT; CH-14; TL: 1736 COBURN RD, BILLINGS, MT; (45-45-59 108-27-19); TOWER SITE OF EXISTING STATION: KCTR-FM, KKBR(FM); ERP(VIS): 5000 KW;
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-310888A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-310888A1.txt
    • N AL NE 086-47-31.0 W 0004937263 New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC Tyler 11/02/2011 06034.15000 32-16-53.8 N AL NE 086-56-48.7 W 0004937276 New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC Selma 11/02/2011 06286.19000 32-20-10.0 N AL NE 087-49-30.1 W 0004937287 New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC STAPLETON 11/02/2011 10975.00000 30-47-41.5 N AL NE 087-46-10.9 W 0004937338 New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC Bay Minette 11/02/2011 11465.00000 30-48-00.5 N KY NE 086-12-12.3 W 0004937927 Kentucky RSA #3 Cellular General PartneMammoth Cave 11/03/2011 06093.45000 37-19-05.4 N Page 22 CF - Common Carrier Fixed Point to Point Microwave State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City KY NE 086-15-54.0 W 0004937935 Kentucky RSA #3 Cellular General PartneBrownsville 11/03/2011 06345.49000 37-11-39.0 N
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-310899A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-310899A1.txt
    • WNEK634 FXO New York Power Authority 10755.00000000 CYSTAL DALE 43-50-31.2 N NY 75-17-28.6 W 6 1 10/06/2011 WQKV460 FXO CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS III, LLC 23025.00000000 SEVERN 39-8-41.9 N MD 76-38-59.2 W 2 1 10/02/2011 WQKW487 FXO CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS III, LLC 23125.00000000 Savage 39-7-34.0 N MD 76-48-37.0 W 4 1 10/06/2011 WQKW490 FXO CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS III, LLC 23175.00000000 Baltimore 39-22-0.5 N MD 76-35-13.6 W 3 1 10/06/2011 WQLG644 FXO CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS III, LLC 22025.00000000 Woodlawn 39-19-55.1 N MD 76-45-31.8 W 2 1 09/30/2011 WQLH602 FXO CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS III, LLC 23075.00000000 Yorkshire 38-48-0.0 N VA 77-26-52.8 W 4 1 09/30/2011 WQLH602 FXO CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS III, LLC 23225.00000000 Yorkshire 38-48-0.0 N VA 77-26-52.8 W 4 1 10/06/2011 WQLH943 FXO
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-311026A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-311026A1.txt
    • LLC Crowell 11/08/2011 06226.89000 34-04-06.7 N Page 15 CF - Common Carrier Fixed Point to Point Microwave State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City NE NE 096-29-32.4 W 0004943244 USCOC NEBRASKA/KANSAS, LLC Walthill 11/08/2011 06034.15000 42-09-21.0 N OK NE 098-53-01.6 W 0004943261 New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC CLINTON 11/08/2011 06256.54000 35-32-00.5 N OK NE 098-57-55.8 W 0004943284 New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC CLINTON 11/08/2011 06004.50000 35-31-00.2 N OK NE 096-58-37.5 W 0004943334 Oklahoma RSA 9 Limited Partnership DICKSON 11/08/2011 06226.89000 34-10-04.8 N WI NE 089-44-31.5 W 0004943445 UNITED STATES CELLULAR OPERATINArgyle 11/08/2011 06605.00000 42-43-14.9 N CA NE 121-54-46.4 W 0004944115 Wiline Networks Inc Milpitas 11/08/2011 18115.00000 37-23-56.8 N NE NE 096-12-32.3
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-311160A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-311160A1.txt
    • State Longitude Loc./ Path ## Ant. MG - Microwave Industrial/Business Pool Broadband Division 10/19/2011 WQKZ821 FXO CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS III, LLC 11305.00000000 Elgin 42-3-16.0 N IL 88-16-50.5 W 3 1 10/19/2011 WQKZ821 FXO CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS III, LLC 11385.00000000 Elgin 42-3-16.0 N IL 88-16-50.5 W 3 1 10/20/2011 WQKZ891 FXO CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS III, LLC 10815.00000000 ELGIN 42-1-30.4 N IL 88-14-0.5 W 3 1 10/20/2011 WQKZ891 FXO CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS III, LLC 10895.00000000 ELGIN 42-1-30.4 N IL 88-14-0.5 W 3 1 10/20/2011 WQKZ913 FXO CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS III, LLC 21925.00000000 CHICAGO 41-56-37.8 N IL 87-42-18.1 W 4 1 10/19/2011 WQLA440 FXO CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS III, LLC 22025.00000000 Harwood Heigh 41-58-4.5 N IL 87-48-23.8 W 2 1 10/19/2011 WQLA440 FXO CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-311375A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-311375A1.txt
    • 1 10/29/2011 WQLU930 FXO CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS III, LLC 19675.00000000 Walnut 34-0-58.1 N CA 117-50-54.0 W2 1 Page 22 Frequency Termination Pending Call Sign Termination Date Stn Class Licensee Name Lower/Upper Frequency City Latitude State Longitude Loc./ Path ## Ant. MG - Microwave Industrial/Business Pool Broadband Division 10/29/2011 WQLU932 FXO CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS III, LLC 23025.00000000 Inglewood 33-57-35.6 N CA 118-21-0.5 W 2 1 10/29/2011 WQLU933 FXO CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS III, LLC 21825.00000000 Baldwin Park 34-4-1.9 N CA 117-58-42.6 W1 1 10/29/2011 WQLU934 FXO CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS III, LLC 23225.00000000 Van Nuys 34-11-40.1 N CA 118-27-59.1 W1 1 10/29/2011 WQLU935 FXO CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS III, LLC 10975.00000000 SHERMAN OA 34-9-38.9 N CA 118-26-56.4 W1 1 10/29/2011 WQLU935 FXO CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-311483A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-311483A1.txt
    • 03650.00000 - 03700.00000 Page 19 NN - 3650-3700 MHz State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City NE WQOP630 0004986077 UBTA-UBET Communications 12/09/2011 03650.00000 - 03700.00000 TI - TV Intercity Relay State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City SC AM WPQR551 081-50-00.5 W 0004891500 MEDIA GENERAL COMMUNICATIONS HBeech Island 12/08/2011 07062.50000 33-24-20.7 N SC AM WLG377 082-36-23.4 W 0004954400 WYFF HEARST TELEVISION INC. CLEVELAND 12/09/2011 06875.00000 - 06900.00000 35-06-43.4 N SC AM WBE734 082-24-37.4 W 0004954420 WYFF HEARST TELEVISION INC. GREENVILLE 12/09/2011 07025.00000 - 07050.00000 34-56-26.4 N SC AM WGV612 081-55-27.8 W 0004954449 WYFF HEARST TELEVISION INC. SPARTANBURG 12/09/2011 07100.00000 - 07125.00000
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-311726A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-311726A1.txt
    • 32-44-08.5 N MS MD WQOA238 089-05-31.4 W 0005000443 State of Mississippi Wireless CommunicatPhiladelphia 12/21/2011 06226.89000 32-44-08.5 N MS MD WQOA238 089-05-31.4 W 0005000443 State of Mississippi Wireless CommunicatPhiladelphia 12/21/2011 06256.54000 32-44-08.5 N MS MD WQOA238 089-05-31.4 W 0005000443 State of Mississippi Wireless CommunicatPhiladelphia 12/21/2011 06286.19000 32-44-08.5 N MS MD WQOB770 089-19-44.5 W 0005000444 State of Mississippi Wireless CommunicatPhiladelphia 12/21/2011 06226.89000 32-55-00.5 N MS MD WQOB770 089-19-44.5 W 0005000444 State of Mississippi Wireless CommunicatPhiladelphia 12/21/2011 06286.19000 32-55-00.5 N MS MD WQOB770 089-19-44.5 W 0005000444 State of Mississippi Wireless CommunicatPhiladelphia 12/21/2011 06315.84000 32-55-00.5 N MS MD WQOB770 089-19-44.5 W 0005000444 State of Mississippi Wireless CommunicatPhiladelphia 12/21/2011 06375.14000 32-55-00.5 N MS MD WQMK344 089-42-15.5 W 0005000445 State of Mississippi Wireless CommunicatKosciusko 12/21/2011 05945.20000 32-52-00.2
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-311729A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-311729A1.txt
    • 39-05-22.5 N ID MD WQDR915 116-49-03.0 W 0005003014 Verizon Wireless (VAW) LLC Coolin 12/22/2011 06256.54000 48-31-53.0 N ID MD WQDR915 116-49-03.0 W 0005003014 Verizon Wireless (VAW) LLC Coolin 12/22/2011 10578.12500 48-31-53.0 N ID MD WQDR915 116-49-03.0 W 0005003014 Verizon Wireless (VAW) LLC Coolin 12/22/2011 10795.00000 48-31-53.0 N WA MD WHF503 119-19-09.6 W 0005003975 NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS PCS, LLCRICHLAND 12/23/2011 10715.00000 46-14-00.5 N WA MD WHF504 119-04-54.9 W 0005004038 NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS PCS, LLCPASCO 12/23/2011 11215.00000 46-15-18.9 N OR MD WPNH768 120-17-15.8 W 0005004061 AT&T Mobility Wireless Operations HoldinCONDON 12/23/2011 06286.19000 45-15-27.3 N OR MD WPNL240 119-17-48.1 W 0005004072 AT&T Mobility Wireless Operations HoldinHEPPNER 12/23/2011 06034.15000 45-12-46.1 N WA NE 121-57-55.1 W 0004999869 T-MOBILE LICENSE LLC Monroe 12/20/2011 19400.00000 47-51-22.0 N AL
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-311775A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-311775A1.txt
    • Service Providers 9 9 0.6 20 75 94 4 Mobile Telephony Including Cellular, 29,814 29,325 1.6 2,846 53,353 56,199 14,550 Personal Communications Service (PCS) and SMR Telephony Carriers Paging & Messaging Service Providers 35 34 1.1 11 134 145 17 Specialized Mobile Radio (SMR) Dispatch 6 6 2.0 12 27 39 2 Mobile Data and Other Mobile Service 15 15 0.5 36 30 66 6 Providers Mobile Service Providers 29,870 29,380 1.6 2,905 53,544 56,449 14,576 Interexchange Carriers (IXCs) 15,018 14,881 0.9 3,277 11,010 14,287 7,830 Operator Service Providers (OSPs) 139 126 9.7 4 411 414 66 Prepaid Calling Card Providers 933 897 3.9 227 587 814 389 Satellite Service Providers 368 365 0.8 103 175 278 157 Toll Resellers 4,327
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-311802A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-311802A1.txt
    • SPECTRUM HOLDINGS III, LLC 22025.00000000 Novato 38-6-21.9 N CA 122-34-46.4 W1 1 11/25/2011 WQLY443 FXO CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS III, LLC 21825.00000000 Sunnyvale 37-23-14.6 N CA 122-2-10.9 W 2 1 11/25/2011 WQLY443 FXO CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS III, LLC 21975.00000000 Sunnyvale 37-23-14.6 N CA 122-2-10.9 W 2 1 11/25/2011 WQLY444 FXO CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS III, LLC 21875.00000000 San Rafael 37-59-24.8 N CA 122-30-0.5 W 1 1 11/25/2011 WQLY444 FXO CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS III, LLC 22025.00000000 San Rafael 37-59-24.8 N CA 122-30-0.5 W 1 1 11/25/2011 WQLY444 FXO CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS III, LLC 19525.00000000 San Rafael 37-59-24.8 N CA 122-30-0.5 W 2 1 11/25/2011 WQLY444 FXO CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS III, LLC 19625.00000000 San Rafael 37-59-24.8 N CA 122-30-0.5 W 2 1 11/25/2011 WQLY445 FXO
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-312138A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-312138A1.txt
    • State Longitude Loc./ Path ## Ant. MG - Microwave Industrial/Business Pool Broadband Division 12/18/2011 WQMB486 FXO CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS III, LLC 23075.00000000 Lynn 42-28-35.0 N MA 70-57-0.7 W 1 1 12/18/2011 WQMB488 FXO CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS III, LLC 22075.00000000 Chelsea 42-23-16.4 N MA 71-1-34.7 W 1 1 12/18/2011 WQMB491 FXO CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS III, LLC 23475.00000000 Burlington 42-28-59.1 N MA 71-11-0.5 W 2 1 12/18/2011 WQMB492 FXO CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS III, LLC 11265.00000000 Quincy 42-17-39.1 N MA 71-1-41.9 W 1 1 12/18/2011 WQMB492 FXO CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS III, LLC 11345.00000000 Quincy 42-17-39.1 N MA 71-1-41.9 W 1 1 12/18/2011 WQMB492 FXO CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS III, LLC 23325.00000000 Quincy 42-17-39.1 N MA 71-1-41.9 W 2 1 12/18/2011 WQMB492 FXO CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-312140A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-312140A1.txt
    • MD WQNR474 105-46-30.6 W 0005031439 TaosNet, LLC Taos 01/17/2012 11505.00000 36-31-28.0 N MD KNQ90 0005031441 UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD 01/17/2012 MD KYT29 0005031460 UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD 01/17/2012 ID MD WQOJ904 116-07-03.4 W 0005032455 First Step Internet, LLC Elk River 01/17/2012 10735.00000 46-50-26.5 N CA MD WQFS465 116-26-01.1 W 0005032684 SKYRIVER COMMUNICATIONS Desert Hot Springs 01/17/2012 06197.24000 33-52-02.9 N GA MD WQIR750 084-21-00.5 W 0005032820 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS II Atlanta 01/17/2012 11345.00000 33-42-39.7 N GA MD WQIR750 084-21-00.5 W 0005032820 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS II Atlanta 01/17/2012 11425.00000 33-42-39.7 N GA MD WQIR750 084-21-00.5 W 0005032820 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS II Atlanta 01/17/2012 19375.00000 33-42-39.7 N GA MD WQIR750 084-21-00.5 W 0005032820 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS II Atlanta 01/17/2012 19475.00000 33-42-39.7 N Page 35 MG -
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-312206A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-312206A1.txt
    • Industrial/Business Pool State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City WA NE 122-03-55.0 W 0005046800 Cyberdyne Networks, Inc Enumclaw 01/26/2012 11585.00000 47-13-36.3 N WA NE 121-59-00.6 W 0005046804 Cyberdyne Networks, Inc Enumclaw 01/26/2012 11305.00000 47-11-56.0 N WA NE 121-59-00.6 W 0005046804 Cyberdyne Networks, Inc Enumclaw 01/26/2012 19460.00000 47-11-56.0 N WA NE 122-00-00.5 W 0005046810 Cyberdyne Networks, Inc Buckley 01/26/2012 10815.00000 47-08-37.2 N WA NE 121-59-22.9 W 0005046820 Cyberdyne Networks, Inc Enumclaw 01/26/2012 17900.00000 47-12-12.2 N MT NE 114-21-00.2 W 0005047161 Cutthroat Communications KALISPELL 01/26/2012 19540.00000 48-10-33.9 N WY NE 104-12-11.8 W 0005047443 Action Communications Inc. Torrington 01/26/2012 11605.00000 41-59-40.9 N CA NE 117-09-44.9 W 0005047692 Station Venture Operations, LP San Diego 01/26/2012
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-312324A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-312324A1.txt
    • Fairbanks 01/31/2012 11225.00000 64-47-16.6 N AK AM WQIQ578 147-30-26.1 W 0004991846 GCI Communication Corp. Fairbanks 01/31/2012 11285.00000 64-47-16.6 N AK AM WQIQ578 147-30-26.1 W 0004991846 GCI Communication Corp. Fairbanks 01/31/2012 17965.00000 64-47-16.6 N AK AM WQIQ578 147-30-26.1 W 0004991846 GCI Communication Corp. Fairbanks 01/31/2012 17995.00000 64-47-16.6 N WA AM WHF503 119-19-09.6 W 0005003975 NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS PCS, LLCRICHLAND 01/30/2012 06123.10000 46-14-00.5 N WA AM WHF503 119-19-09.6 W 0005003975 NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS PCS, LLCRICHLAND 01/30/2012 06152.75000 46-14-00.5 N WA AM WHF503 119-19-09.6 W 0005003975 NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS PCS, LLCRICHLAND 01/30/2012 10715.00000 46-14-00.5 N VI AM WPTW743 064-58-12.0 W 0005005034 AT&T Mobility Puerto Rico Inc. St. Thomas 02/02/2012 11632.50000 18-21-24.9 N VI AM WPTW743 064-58-12.0 W 0005005034 AT&T Mobility Puerto Rico Inc. St.
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-312325A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-312325A1.txt
    • 33-27-47.2 N GA AM WPNC888 085-01-58.7 W 0005038905 Southern Company Services, Inc. LOWELL 02/03/2012 06555.00000 33-24-49.4 N ID AM WQOJ910 116-21-31.0 W 0005056579 First Step Internet, LLC Bovill 02/03/2012 11305.00000 46-46-50.5 N ID AM WQOJ910 116-21-31.0 W 0005056579 First Step Internet, LLC Bovill 02/03/2012 17965.00000 46-46-50.5 N HI MD KTS97 157-47-40.1 W 0005057673 Hawaiian Electric Company Inc. KANEOHE 02/02/2012 02141.20000 21-23-00.5 N HI MD KTS97 157-47-40.1 W 0005057673 Hawaiian Electric Company Inc. KANEOHE 02/02/2012 06745.00000 21-23-00.5 N HI MD KTS97 157-47-40.1 W 0005057673 Hawaiian Electric Company Inc. KANEOHE 02/02/2012 06865.00000 21-23-00.5 N HI MD WHI547 157-45-32.1 W 0005057678 Hawaiian Electric Company Inc. Kaneohe 02/02/2012 02191.20000 21-25-34.5 N HI MD WHI547 157-45-32.1 W 0005057678 Hawaiian Electric Company Inc. Kaneohe 02/02/2012 06585.00000 21-25-34.5
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-312336A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-312336A1.txt
    • WQMC859 FXO CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS III, LLC 10775.00000000 Methuen 42-44-55.3 N MA 71-8-55.8 W 3 1 12/30/2011 WQMC859 FXO CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS III, LLC 10855.00000000 Methuen 42-44-55.3 N MA 71-8-55.8 W 3 1 12/30/2011 WQMC863 FXO CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS III, LLC 21825.00000000 Everett 42-23-56.6 N MA 71-2-53.3 W 1 1 12/30/2011 WQMC869 FXO CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS III, LLC 23025.00000000 Lawrence 42-43-0.5 N MA 71-9-28.5 W 1 1 12/30/2011 WQMC869 FXO CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS III, LLC 23275.00000000 Lawrence 42-43-0.5 N MA 71-9-28.5 W 2 1 12/30/2011 WQMC869 FXO CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS III, LLC 23025.00000000 Lawrence 42-43-0.5 N MA 71-9-28.5 W 4 1 12/30/2011 WQMC869 FXO CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS III, LLC 23125.00000000 Lawrence 42-43-0.5 N MA 71-9-28.5 W 4 1 12/30/2011 WQMC878 FXO
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-312454A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-312454A1.txt
    • State Police Montclair 02/08/2012 06685.00000 38-35-45.5 N Page 7 MW - Microwave Public Safety Pool State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City MN NE 092-22-18.0 W 0005066475 Minnesota, State of Wrenshall 02/08/2012 06605.00000 46-36-55.0 N MN NE 092-22-18.0 W 0005066475 Minnesota, State of Wrenshall 02/08/2012 06615.00000 46-36-55.0 N NJ NE 074-28-00.5 W 0005066612 PISCATAWAY, TOWNSHIP OF Piscataway 02/08/2012 11385.00000 40-32-25.7 N NJ NE 074-27-40.6 W 0005066613 PISCATAWAY, TOWNSHIP OF PISCATAWAY 02/08/2012 10895.00000 40-31-16.2 N MN NE 094-52-39.7 W 0005066677 Minnesota, State of Lake George 02/08/2012 06546.25000 47-12-58.3 N VA NE 080-13-48.9 W 0005069380 Virginia Department of State Police New Castle 02/10/2012 06775.00000 37-32-10.0 N VA NE 079-02-49.8 W 0005069384 Virginia Department
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-312456A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-312456A1.txt
    • AM KNKN276 106-34-25.7 W 0004936632 New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC MIDWEST 02/10/2012 43-29-58.3 N WY AM KNKN276 104-55-54.5 W 0004936632 New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC Moorcroft 02/10/2012 44-16-07.5 N WY AM KNKN276 104-11-57.8 W 0004936632 New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC Mule Creek Jct 02/10/2012 43-21-50.8 N WY AM KNKN276 104-14-35.3 W 0004936632 New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC NEW CASTLE 02/10/2012 43-52-00.5 N WY AM KNKN276 107-13-49.2 W 0004936632 New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC Ranchester 02/10/2012 44-55-16.2 N Page 21 CL - Cellular State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City WY AM KNKN276 105-28-15.6 W 0004936632 New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC Reno Junction 02/10/2012 43-44-32.3 N WY AM KNKN276 105-12-18.2 W 0004936632
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-312574A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-312574A1.txt
    • Bagley, Inc. Cameron 02/17/2012 10715.00000 35-52-09.6 N AZ MD WQIK454 111-25-00.9 W 0005082165 Smith Bagley, Inc. Cameron 02/17/2012 10755.00000 35-52-09.6 N IL NE 087-37-18.2 W 0005070914 SilverIP Communications, Inc. Chicago 02/13/2012 21525.00000 41-53-11.8 N WV NE 080-42-44.8 W 0005071681 HARDY CELLULAR TELEPHONE COMPAlderson 02/13/2012 06226.89000 37-38-10.1 N TX NE 096-11-42.0 W 0005072225 Texas RSA 7B1 Limited Partnership BONHAM 02/13/2012 18025.00000 33-35-00.5 N PR NE 066-32-37.3 W 0005072881 Sprint Spectrum L.P. Barceloneta 02/13/2012 17765.00000 18-26-40.9 N PR NE 066-32-37.3 W 0005072881 Sprint Spectrum L.P. Barceloneta 02/13/2012 17865.00000 18-26-40.9 N PR NE 066-47-31.2 W 0005072883 Sprint Spectrum L.P. Arecibo 02/13/2012 10735.00000 18-27-40.1 N PR NE 066-47-31.2 W 0005072883 Sprint Spectrum L.P. Arecibo 02/13/2012 10775.00000 18-27-40.1 N PR NE 066-47-31.2 W 0005072883 Sprint Spectrum
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-312575A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-312575A1.txt
    • CIDRA 02/15/2012 10995.00000 18-09-41.4 N PR AM WPTD267 066-06-23.6 W 0005073672 SprintCom, Inc. CIDRA 02/15/2012 11035.00000 18-09-41.4 N PR AM WPTD267 066-06-23.6 W 0005073672 SprintCom, Inc. CIDRA 02/15/2012 11185.00000 18-09-41.4 N PR AM WPTD267 066-06-23.6 W 0005073672 SprintCom, Inc. CIDRA 02/15/2012 17845.00000 18-09-41.4 N PR AM WPTD267 066-06-23.6 W 0005073672 SprintCom, Inc. CIDRA 02/15/2012 23075.00000 18-09-41.4 N PR AM WPSL955 066-04-00.5 W 0005073682 SprintCom, Inc. San Juan 02/15/2012 11215.00000 18-22-09.5 N PR AM WPSL955 066-04-00.5 W 0005073682 SprintCom, Inc. San Juan 02/15/2012 11225.00000 18-22-09.5 N PR AM WPSL955 066-04-00.5 W 0005073682 SprintCom, Inc. San Juan 02/15/2012 11305.00000 18-22-09.5 N PR AM WPSL955 066-04-00.5 W 0005073682 SprintCom, Inc. San Juan 02/15/2012 11365.00000 18-22-09.5 N PR AM WPSL955 066-04-00.5 W 0005073682 SprintCom, Inc.
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-312576A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-312576A1.txt
    • Communications Act of 1934, as amended, that were accepted for filing. AF - Aeronautical and Fixed State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City SD AM 098-25-07.5 W 0005076987 Aviation Spectrum Resources Inc Aberdeen 02/16/2012 00131.62500 45-20-09.0 N FL NE 086-08-57.8 W 0005079255 DeFuniak Springs, City of DeFuniak Springs 02/16/2012 00122.80000 30-44-00.5 N FL NE 080-48-00.5 W 0005079704 Space Coast Jet Center Titusville 02/16/2012 00122.95000 28-30-35.0 N AS - Aural Studio Transmitter Link State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City AZ MD WPNG759 110-15-52.7 W 0005080127 WORLD RADIO NETWORK, INC. Sierra Vista 02/16/2012 00945.50000 31-33-15.3 N AK NE 134-29-36.0 W 0005078794 JUNEAU
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-312690A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-312690A1.txt
    • WPKQ514 A 0005082716 Silke Communications 02/21/2012 00466.85000 MD WPKQ514 A 0005082716 Silke Communications 02/21/2012 00468.35000 Page 33 IK - Industrial/Business Pool - Commercial, Conventional State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City MD WPKQ514 A 0005082716 Silke Communications 02/21/2012 00468.70000 OR MD WPKQ514 123-00-29.3 W 0005082716 Silke Communications SPRINGFIELD 02/21/2012 00461.32500 44-02-00.5 N OR MD WPKQ514 123-00-29.3 W 0005082716 Silke Communications SPRINGFIELD 02/21/2012 00461.65000 44-02-00.5 N OR MD WPKQ514 123-00-29.3 W 0005082716 Silke Communications SPRINGFIELD 02/21/2012 00461.85000 44-02-00.5 N OR MD WPKQ514 123-00-29.3 W 0005082716 Silke Communications SPRINGFIELD 02/21/2012 00463.35000 44-02-00.5 N OR MD WPKQ514 123-00-29.3 W 0005082716 Silke Communications SPRINGFIELD 02/21/2012 00463.70000 44-02-00.5 N RM WNZC904 A 0005084149 TRUSS, JOSEPH: TRUSS,
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-312691A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-312691A1.txt
    • pre-grant notice and petition procedure of Section 309 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, that were accepted for filing. AF - Aeronautical and Fixed State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City CA NE 120-52-05.6 W 0005088596 City of Los Banos Los Banos 02/23/2012 00122.80000 37-03-30.2 N FL NE 080-48-00.5 W 0005090144 Space Coast Jet Center Titusville 02/24/2012 00122.95000 28-30-35.0 N AS - Aural Studio Transmitter Link State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City NJ AM WHN290 074-35-01.0 W 0004990236 LONGPORT MEDIA, LLC LINDEN 02/23/2012 00948.00000 39-20-33.5 N MI MD WPJD807 083-46-10.8 W 0005088653 POTENTIAL BROADCASTING, LLC, AS TFlint 02/23/2012
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-312921A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-312921A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-312921A1.txt
    • red lights (L-864 and L-810) 100 2.5 249 Gehring et al. 436 (133) New Hampshire Yes 2 134 Sawyer (1961) 466 (142) Wisconsin 180 2 14 Travis (2009) 466 (142) Wisconsin 180 2 5 Travis (2009) 528 (161) West Virginia Yes 6 116 Herron (1997) 535 (163) Wisconsin 180 2 20 Travis (2009) 605-1588 (184.4 - 484)** Illinois Yes 13 0.5 5,465 Seets and Bohlen (1977) 627 (191) Florida Yes Red and white lights 1 1 617 Roberts and Tamborski (1993) 942 (287) Tennessee Yes 19.75 253 Laskey (1960,1962, 1963a,b, 1964, 1967, 1968, 1969a,b, 1971), Goodpasture (1974a, b, 1975, 1976, 1984, 1986); Bierly (1973) 961 (293) New York Yes Red beacon 4-33 30 267 Morris et al. (2003) 981 (299) Iowa
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-312929A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-312929A1.txt
    • Internet Services, Inc. Red Oak 03/06/2012 10815.00000 32-31-54.7 N TX MD WQID407 096-46-54.0 W 0005104995 AirCanopy Internet Services, Inc. Red Oak 03/06/2012 10855.00000 32-31-54.7 N TX MD WQID407 096-46-54.0 W 0005104995 AirCanopy Internet Services, Inc. Red Oak 03/06/2012 10895.00000 32-31-54.7 N TX MD WQID407 096-46-54.0 W 0005104995 AirCanopy Internet Services, Inc. Red Oak 03/06/2012 10935.00000 32-31-54.7 N TX MD WQKH408 096-51-00.5 W 0005105017 AirCanopy Internet Services, Inc. Waxahachie 03/06/2012 19525.00000 32-26-23.9 N TX MD WQKH408 096-51-00.5 W 0005105017 AirCanopy Internet Services, Inc. Waxahachie 03/06/2012 19575.00000 32-26-23.9 N TX MD WQKH408 096-51-00.5 W 0005105017 AirCanopy Internet Services, Inc. Waxahachie 03/06/2012 19625.00000 32-26-23.9 N TX MD WQKH408 096-51-00.5 W 0005105017 AirCanopy Internet Services, Inc. Waxahachie 03/06/2012 19675.00000 32-26-23.9 N TX MD WQGK212 096-54-34.0
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-312930A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-312930A1.txt
    • CA MD WRE4 118-24-32.3 W 0005108589 Aviation Spectrum Resources Inc LOS ANGELES 03/08/2012 00128.90000 33-56-33.0 N NV MD KPF7 115-29-42.0 W 0005108603 Aviation Spectrum Resources Inc MOUNT POTOSI 03/08/2012 00128.90000 35-53-32.9 N AZ MD KPS2 112-12-32.6 W 0005108621 Aviation Spectrum Resources Inc WILLIAMS 03/08/2012 00131.30000 35-11-42.0 N TX MD WEY7 097-02-01.0 W 0005108640 Aviation Spectrum Resources Inc DALLAS 03/08/2012 00131.17500 32-54-00.5 N TX MD WCW2 097-39-14.0 W 0005108684 Aviation Spectrum Resources Inc HARLINGEN 03/08/2012 00131.17500 26-13-42.3 N AR MD KKO4 092-14-00.5 W 0005108762 Aviation Spectrum Resources Inc LITTLE ROCK 03/08/2012 00131.17500 34-44-00.3 N TX MD WFY6 095-20-00.8 W 0005109305 Aviation Spectrum Resources Inc HOUSTON 03/08/2012 00131.17500 29-58-00.8 N GA NE 084-14-13.0 W 0005109167 City of Camilla Camilla 03/08/2012 00122.80000 31-12-52.0 N
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-312943A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-312943A1.txt
    • SPECTRUM HOLDINGS III, LLC 11055.00000000 Los Angeles 34-13-28.8 N CA 118-37-39.9 W2 1 02/06/2012 WQLU903 FXO CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS III, LLC 10815.00000000 Los Angeles 34-13-28.8 N CA 118-37-39.9 W3 1 02/06/2012 WQLU903 FXO CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS III, LLC 10895.00000000 Los Angeles 34-13-28.8 N CA 118-37-39.9 W3 1 02/06/2012 WQLU932 FXO CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS III, LLC 23075.00000000 Inglewood 33-57-35.6 N CA 118-21-0.5 W 3 1 02/06/2012 WQLU932 FXO CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS III, LLC 23175.00000000 Inglewood 33-57-35.6 N CA 118-21-0.5 W 3 1 02/06/2012 WQLU935 FXO CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS III, LLC 18065.00000000 SHERMAN OA 34-9-38.9 N CA 118-26-56.4 W4 1 02/09/2012 WQLV292 FXO CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS III, LLC 23075.00000000 Commerce 33-58-46.5 N CA 118-8-57.3 W 2 1 02/09/2012 WQLV292 FXO CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-313091A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-313091A1.txt
    • W 0005114140 ConocoPhillips Communications Inc. Yorktown 03/12/2012 10815.00000 29-05-32.4 N RI NE 071-27-12.2 W 0005114370 ZGS Providence, Inc. CRANSTON 03/12/2012 06695.00000 41-44-31.3 N NC NE 078-34-40.9 W 0005114532 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIraleigh 03/12/2012 10735.00000 35-55-27.9 N NC NE 078-34-40.9 W 0005114532 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIraleigh 03/12/2012 10815.00000 35-55-27.9 N PA NE 074-55-06.5 W 0005115473 Eastern MLG LLC BENSALEM 03/13/2012 06004.50000 40-05-00.5 N PA NE 074-55-06.5 W 0005115473 Eastern MLG LLC BENSALEM 03/13/2012 06152.75000 40-05-00.5 N NJ NE 074-29-31.5 W 0005115475 Eastern MLG LLC FRANKLIN TOWNS 03/13/2012 06256.54000 40-28-37.0 N NJ NE 074-29-31.5 W 0005115475 Eastern MLG LLC FRANKLIN TOWNS 03/13/2012 06375.14000 40-28-37.0 N NJ NE 074-01-43.0 W 0005115476 Eastern MLG LLC Union City 03/13/2012 06123.10000 40-45-40.1 N PA NE 075-09-37.0 W
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-313253A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-313253A1.txt
    • W 0005131430 CHARLOTTE, CITY OF Charlotte 03/23/2012 11075.00000 35-14-19.1 N NC NE 080-50-34.2 W 0005131430 CHARLOTTE, CITY OF Charlotte 03/23/2012 11155.00000 35-14-19.1 N NC NE 081-02-36.6 W 0005131433 CHARLOTTE, CITY OF CHARLOTTE 03/23/2012 06093.45000 35-05-47.1 N NC NE 081-02-36.6 W 0005131433 CHARLOTTE, CITY OF CHARLOTTE 03/23/2012 11325.00000 35-05-47.1 N NC NE 080-49-57.0 W 0005131443 CHARLOTTE, CITY OF Charlotte 03/23/2012 11365.00000 35-14-00.5 N NC NE 080-49-57.0 W 0005131443 CHARLOTTE, CITY OF Charlotte 03/23/2012 11445.00000 35-14-00.5 N NC NE 080-49-57.0 W 0005131443 CHARLOTTE, CITY OF Charlotte 03/23/2012 11525.00000 35-14-00.5 N NC NE 080-49-57.0 W 0005131443 CHARLOTTE, CITY OF Charlotte 03/23/2012 11565.00000 35-14-00.5 N NC NE 080-49-57.0 W 0005131443 CHARLOTTE, CITY OF Charlotte 03/23/2012 11645.00000 35-14-00.5 N NC NE 080-49-57.0 W 0005131443 CHARLOTTE, CITY
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-313254A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-313254A1.txt
    • A 0005123125 MONTECIELO SOUND 03/19/2012 00475.53750 OH NE 080-41-28.0 W 0005123125 MONTECIELO SOUND LISBON 03/19/2012 00472.21250 40-41-03.0 N OH NE 080-41-28.0 W 0005123125 MONTECIELO SOUND LISBON 03/19/2012 00472.53750 40-41-03.0 N Page 55 YM - 800 MHz Trunked SMR (SMR, Site-specific) State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City IA MD WQKD860 091-41-00.5 W 0005126399 RACOM CORPORATION CEDAR RAPIDS 03/20/2012 00854.38750 41-57-10.6 N IA MD WQKD860 091-41-00.5 W 0005126399 RACOM CORPORATION CEDAR RAPIDS 03/20/2012 00856.88750 41-57-10.6 N IA MD WQKD860 091-41-00.5 W 0005126399 RACOM CORPORATION CEDAR RAPIDS 03/20/2012 00857.88750 41-57-10.6 N IA MD WQKD860 091-41-00.5 W 0005126399 RACOM CORPORATION CEDAR RAPIDS 03/20/2012 00858.88750 41-57-10.6 N IA MD WQKD860 091-41-00.5 W 0005126399 RACOM CORPORATION
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-313255A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-313255A1.txt
    • Group, LLC Otwell 03/21/2012 06093.45000 38-27-13.4 N IN NE 087-05-28.7 W 0005128174 Zayo Group, LLC Otwell 03/21/2012 06152.75000 38-27-13.4 N NY NE 075-38-00.3 W 0005128940 Verizon Wireless (VAW) LLC Afton 03/22/2012 06093.45000 42-12-09.1 N CA NE 116-41-33.5 W 0005128941 Verizon Wireless (VAW) LLC Alpine 03/22/2012 10755.00000 32-44-37.8 N NY NE 075-26-59.4 W 0005128944 Verizon Wireless (VAW) LLC Deposit 03/22/2012 05945.20000 42-02-00.5 N NY NE 074-59-00.9 W 0005128946 Verizon Wireless (VAW) LLC Herkimer 03/22/2012 11285.00000 43-01-08.1 N NY NE 074-31-40.7 W 0005128947 Verizon Wireless (VAW) LLC Ulster 03/22/2012 06315.84000 42-08-15.5 N NY NE 074-51-27.2 W 0005128948 Verizon Wireless (VAW) LLC Little Falls 03/22/2012 10795.00000 43-01-57.3 N NY NE 077-19-17.2 W 0005129215 Verizon Wireless (VAW) LLC Bath 03/22/2012 06004.50000 42-21-25.2 N NY NE
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-313286A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-313286A2.txt
    • $851,303 0.1 0.0 0.0 3.5 96.4 $74,883 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0100.0 $205,465 0.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 99.1 20,698,660 0.1 0.0 0.0 15.2 84.7 Denmark $5,515,297 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.5 98.5 $181,443 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0100.0 $2,670,627 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 99.9 73,044,063 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.7 97.3 Finland $3,490,402 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.8 99.2 $90,660 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0100.0 $101,448 0.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 99.5 46,549,425 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.1 98.9 France $38,487,031 0.0 0.0 0.5 0.9 98.6 $5,754,860 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0100.0 $14,597,191 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 99.9 931,389,310 0.0 0.0 0.5 0.7 98.7 Germany $62,835,185 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 99.9 $14,270,528 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0100.0 $56,909,136 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0100.0 1,982,130,073 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 99.9 Gibraltar $153,290 0.0
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-313398A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-313398A1.txt
    • 078-42-59.9 W 0005135212 Clearwire Spectrum Holdings, LLC RALEIGH 03/26/2012 19525.00000 35-52-07.6 N NC MD WQEY487 078-42-59.9 W 0005135212 Clearwire Spectrum Holdings, LLC RALEIGH 03/26/2012 19625.00000 35-52-07.6 N NC MD WQEY487 078-42-59.9 W 0005135212 Clearwire Spectrum Holdings, LLC RALEIGH 03/26/2012 23025.00000 35-52-07.6 N NC MD WQEY487 078-42-59.9 W 0005135212 Clearwire Spectrum Holdings, LLC RALEIGH 03/26/2012 23125.00000 35-52-07.6 N NC MD WQLK968 078-42-00.5 W 0005135213 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIRaleigh 03/26/2012 21825.00000 35-52-42.6 N NC MD WQLK968 078-42-00.5 W 0005135213 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIRaleigh 03/26/2012 21925.00000 35-52-42.6 N PA MD WQOT924 077-53-13.8 W 0005135649 Coralinks Bellefonte 03/27/2012 06004.50000 41-00-54.3 N PA MD WQOT924 077-53-13.8 W 0005135649 Coralinks Bellefonte 03/27/2012 06034.15000 41-00-54.3 N PA MD WQOT924 077-53-13.8 W 0005135649 Coralinks Bellefonte 03/27/2012 06093.45000 41-00-54.3 N
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-313506A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-313506A1.txt
    • Name Latitude City IA MD KPF246 P 091-38-27.6 W 0005153909 CITICASTERS LICENSES, INC. CEDAR RAPIDS 04/06/2012 00161.64000 42-01-43.0 N IA MD KPF246 P 091-38-27.6 W 0005153909 CITICASTERS LICENSES, INC. CEDAR RAPIDS 04/06/2012 00161.67000 42-01-43.0 N TI - TV Intercity Relay State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City AZ AM WQPC682 111-07-00.5 W 0005031130 KOLD LICENSE SUBSIDIARY, LLC South Tucson 04/05/2012 07075.00000 - 07100.00000 32-14-56.4 N YX - SMR, 806-821/851-866 MHz, Trunked State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City MD WPEV459 A 0005153883 White, James R 04/06/2012 00806.00000 - 00821.00000 MD WPEV459 A 0005153883 White, James R 04/06/2012 00851.00000 - 00866.00000 NC
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-313950A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-313950A1.txt
    • OF Duluth 05/04/2012 11405.00000 46-50-46.0 N CO NE 104-42-31.4 W 0005194542 WELD COUNTY COLORADO Greeley 05/04/2012 11015.00000 40-27-04.8 N CO NE 104-42-31.4 W 0005194542 WELD COUNTY COLORADO Greeley 05/04/2012 11425.00000 40-27-04.8 N CO NE 104-53-14.7 W 0005194543 WELD COUNTY COLORADO Greeley 05/04/2012 11385.00000 40-23-39.2 N CO NE 104-53-14.7 W 0005194543 WELD COUNTY COLORADO Greeley 05/04/2012 11505.00000 40-23-39.2 N RI NE 071-22-00.5 W 0005194800 Narragansett Bay Commission Providence 05/04/2012 19625.00000 41-51-10.8 N RI NE 071-22-00.5 W 0005194800 Narragansett Bay Commission Providence 05/04/2012 19675.00000 41-51-10.8 N RO WEG894 0005184268 CONTRA COSTA, COUNTY OF 04/30/2012 RO WPVP272 0005184567 METROPOLITAN ST.LOUIS SEWER DIS 04/30/2012 RO KCI64 0005185323 CALIFORNIA, STATE OF 04/30/2012 RO KCI66 0005185324 CALIFORNIA, STATE OF 04/30/2012 RO WNEQ627 0005185475 MESA, CITY OF 04/30/2012
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-313952A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-313952A1.txt
    • 39-28-41.7 N VA NE 081-16-11.7 W 0005192657 Verizon Wireless (VAW) LLC Bluefield 05/03/2012 05945.20000 37-14-48.9 N VA NE 081-16-11.7 W 0005192657 Verizon Wireless (VAW) LLC Bluefield 05/03/2012 06063.80000 37-14-48.9 N VA NE 081-16-11.7 W 0005192657 Verizon Wireless (VAW) LLC Bluefield 05/03/2012 10955.00000 37-14-48.9 N VA NE 081-16-11.7 W 0005192657 Verizon Wireless (VAW) LLC Bluefield 05/03/2012 11035.00000 37-14-48.9 N VA NE 081-18-00.5 W 0005192658 Verizon Wireless (VAW) LLC Bluefield 05/03/2012 11445.00000 37-14-04.7 N VA NE 081-18-00.5 W 0005192658 Verizon Wireless (VAW) LLC Bluefield 05/03/2012 11525.00000 37-14-04.7 N VA NE 081-22-37.1 W 0005192659 Verizon Wireless (VAW) LLC North Tazewell 05/03/2012 06197.24000 37-10-50.9 N VA NE 081-22-37.1 W 0005192659 Verizon Wireless (VAW) LLC North Tazewell 05/03/2012 06315.84000 37-10-50.9 N MD NE 078-42-38.0 W 0005194209
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-212A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-212A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-212A1.txt
    • by emissions from a Government GSO space station or from a Government space station in a NGSO constellation of 50 or fewer satellites, for all conditions and for all methods of modulation, shall not exceed the following values in any 1 MHz band: -115 dB(W/m2) for angles of arrival above the horizontal plane (() between 0° and 5°, -115 + 0.5(( - 5) dB(W/m2) for ( between 5° and 25°, and (3) -105 dB(W/m2) for ( between 25° and 90°. (b) In the sub-band 17.8-19.3 GHz, the power-flux density at the surface of the Earth produced by emissions from a Government space station in an NGSO constellation of 51 or more satellites, for all conditions and for all methods of modulation,
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-221A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-221A1.txt
    • divesting to a trust as an interim measure. Revised Consent Decree at Section V. 863 See In the Matter of 1998 Biennial Regulatory Review Spectrum Aggregation Limits for Wireless Telecommunications Carriers, etc., WT Dkt Nos. 98-205 and 96-59, GN Dkt. No. 93-252, Report and Order, FCC 99-244, (rel. Sept. 22, 1999) (Spectrum Cap Order) at para. 117 ("Consistent with section 0.5(c) of the Commission's rules, we delegate authority to the Wireless Telecommunications Bureau to review proposed trusts to ensure that they comply with our rules." (footnote omitted)). 864 47 C.F.R. § 20.6(a). Exceptions to the general rules are permitted under the significant overlap provision of the rule. 47 C.F.R. § 20.6(c). 865 In the Seattle MTA, GTE currently holds only 20
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-244A5.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-244A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-244A5.txt
    • the reference point. The east-west lines shall be parallel to the lines of latitude. Where there is an overlap between the RSA and the Protected Service Area, BTA, or Partitioned Service Area to be studied, additional lines may be used, spaced equidistant from one another and from the 1.5 km-spaced lines (i.e., lines with a spacing in km of 0.75, 0.5, 0.375, 0.25, etc). The study points shall be at the intersections of the orthogonal line structure. Signals from the potentially interfering system shall be evaluated at the study points. The signal level at each of the study points is calculated using the terrain-based propagation analysis tool specified below to determine the signal level incident at that point from each regional
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-289A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-289A1.txt
    • Aug. 5, 1999, at 6. 6 Inquiry Concerning The Deployment Of Advanced Telecommunications Capability To All Americans In A Reasonable And Timely Fashion, And Possible Steps To Accelerate Such Deployment Pursuant To Section 706 Of The Telecommunications Act Of 1996, Report, 14 FCC Rcd 2398, 2422. 7 Id. at 2406. Figure 1. Maximum Downstream Speeds Using WLL 155 25 10 0.5 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 Megabytes per Second Mobile Telephone Wireless Cable Upperbands Unlicensed Federal Communications Commission FCC 00-289 E-3 C. Service Providers 1. Cellular (800 MHz) / Broadband PCS (1900 MHz) In the United States, the current WLL in these bands is still in an early stage of development, is currently targeted at low-use/residential
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-349A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-349A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-349A1.txt
    • FM stations; or if it would result in new or increased overlap with an LP100 station, as set forth below: (1) * * * (2) * * * (3) * * * (4) LP100 stations (Protected Contour: 1 mV/m) Frequency separation Interference contour of proposed translator station Protected contour of LP100 LPFM station Cochannel 200 kHz 0.1 mV/m (40 dBu) 0.5 mV/m (54 dBu) 1 mV/m (60 dBu) 1 mV/m (60 dBu) Note: For the purposes of determining overlap pursuant to this subsection, LPFM applications and permits that have not yet been licensed must be considered as operating with the maximum permitted facilities. All LPFM TIS stations must be protected on the basis of a nondirectional antenna. * * * *
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-368A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-368A1.pdf
    • C...................................... 270 (168) 209 (130) 99 (61) Section 73.315 is amended by deleting the Note. Section 73.509 is amended by revising subsection (a) to read as follows: (a) * * * * * Contour of Contour of other Frequency separation proposed station station Co-channel......................0.1mV/m (40 dBu).. 1 mV/m (60 dBu). 1 mV/m (60 dBu)... 0.1 mV/m (40 dBu). 200 kHz......................... 0.5 mV/m (54 dBu).. 1 mV/m (60 dBu). 1 mV/m (60 dBu)... 0.5 mV/m (54 dBu). 400 kHz/600 kHz ........ 100 mV/m (100 dBu) 1 mV/m (60 dBu). 1 mV/m (60 dBu)... 100 mV/m (100 dBu). A new Section 73.515 is added as follows: § 73.515 NCE FM Transmitter Location The transmitter location shall be chosen so that, on the basis
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-369A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-369A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-369A1.txt
    • the Domestic Fixed-Satellite Service, 93 F.C.C. 2d 832, 837-38, ¶ 17 (1983). Sprint, at 4, observes that it uses satellite service exclusively to serve nearly 50 countries. See, e.g., Comsat Opposition at 11. Comsat states that a 100% excess bandwidth assignment allowance would not begin to satisfy needed frequency assignment flexibility. It observes that typical earth station carriers range from 0.5 to 36 MHz in occupied bandwidth and contends that the proposed demonstrated need rule would result in a tuning flexibility only on the order of 1 MHz for the narrowest, and 72 MHz for the widest, in this range, an amount of agility that would make carrier frequency relocation difficult because relocation often requires shifts of greater than 72 MHz.
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-418A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-418A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-418A1.txt
    • 119.0 Earth station location Denver, CO Washington, D.C. Seattle, WA Miami, FL DBS satellite e.i.r.p. towards the Earth station location dBW 48.8 52.6 46.7 52.6 Earth station elevation above mean sea level mm 1.58 0.01 0.01 0.0 Earth station elevation angle degrees 41.8 27.6 35.2 37.7 Free space loss dB 205.9 206.1 206.0 205.9 Earth station antenna miss-pointing error dB 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 Atmospheric absorption dB 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 Clear-sky receive system noise temperature Kelvin 85 85 85 85 Clear-sky earth station antenna G/T dB 14.5 14.5 14.5 14.5 C/I for other assignments in the BSS Plan dB 20.0 20.0 20.0 20.0 Clear-sky feeder link C/(N+I) dB 26.2 26.2 26.2 26.2 Clear-sky carrier-to-noise plus interference ratio dB 10.7 13.6
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-427A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-427A2.txt
    • 0 0 A WYFM FMClsc Hits Youngstown - Warren, OH 104Sharon PACumulus Broadcasting Inc 1947 3500 7.1 1.73 B WGFT AMChrst/Talk Youngstown - Warren, OH 104Youngstown OHEsquire Communications Incorporated 1976 125 0.6 0.36 B WKTX AMOldies Youngstown - Warren, OH 104Cortland OHKossanyi Family 1985 100 0.3 0 B WASN AMTalk Youngstown - Warren, OH 104Campbell OHOtter Communications Ltd 1955 0 0.5 0 B WRBP AMTalk Youngstown - Warren, OH 104Warren OHOtter Communications Ltd 1941 450 1.7 1 B 21500 78.2 Out of Market Stations 41.9% 47.3% (Home Market Listed) 54.1% 44.2% WDVE FMRock Pittsburgh, PA 22 Pittsburgh PAClear Channel Communications 1962 14100 0 0 B WGAR FMCountry Cleveland 24 Cleveland OHClear Channel Communications 1948 10000 0 0 B WJST FMAC Akron,
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-435A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-435A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-435A1.txt
    • 14 GHz band are subject to the provisions of §25.220 of this chapter, which may include power reduction requirements. (d)(2) In the 6 GHz band, an earth station with an equivalent diameter antenna of 4.5 meters or greater may be routinely licensed for transmission of SCPC services if the maximum power spectral densities into the antenna do not exceed + 0.5 dB(W/4kHz) for analog SCPC carriers with bandwidths up to 200 kHz and do not exceed -2.7 - 10log(N) dB (W/4kHz) for narrow and/or wideband digital SCPC carriers. (i) For digital SCPC using frequency division multiple access (FDMA) or time division multiple access (TDMA) technique, N is equal to one. (ii) For digital SCPC using code division multiple access (CDMA) technique,
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-107A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-107A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-107A1.txt
    • This additional non-Signatory ownership existed prior to the IPO. Of the Signatory ownership, Comsat, a subsidiary of Lockheed Martin Corporation, a publicly traded U.S. company, holds 14.5 percent of outstanding New Skies shares. No INTELSAT Signatory other than Comsat holds more than 4.4 percent post-IPO interest in New Skies. And 84 percent of New Skies non-public shareholders own less than 0.5 percent each of the outstanding shares. LMGT agrees that New Skies has achieved ``substantial dilution'' under the terms of the ORBIT Act. LMGT states that the issue of substantial dilution requires an individualized determination based on the company's particular circumstances. It contends that the market conditions that existed and the amount of dilution achieved in comparison with other companies past
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-182A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-182A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-182A1.txt
    • fade conditions. (p) In the band 40.0- 40.5 GHz, the power flux-density at the Earth's surface produced by emissions from a space station for all conditions and for all methods of modulation shall not exceed the following values: -115 dB(W/m2) in any 1 MHz band for angles of arrival between 0 and 5 degrees above the horizontal plane; -115 + 0.5 ((-5) dB(W/m2) in any 1 MHz band for angles of arrival ( (in degrees) between 5 and 25 degrees above the horizontal plane; and -105 dB(W/m2) in any 1 MHz band for angles of arrival between 25 and 90 degrees above the horizontal plane; These limits relate to the power flux-density that would be obtained under assumed free-space propagation conditions.
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-288A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-288A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-288A1.txt
    • Exhibit 2. Intelsat LLC states that on a year-to-date basis: (1) 44 IPOs have been priced in 2001, raising $28.6 billion as comapred to 255 issues raising $86.7 billion at this point in 2000; (2) 127 IPOs have been withdrawn or postponed in 2001; (3) the ratio of delayed or postponed IPOs to completed transactions is 2.9, as compared to 0.5 (133/255) at this point in 2000; (4) zero telecom IPOs have been priced, as compared to 33 issues at this point in 2000; and (5) the two satellite IPOs to come to market in 2001 were withdrawn or postponed due to market conditions. Id. Intelsat LLC states that: (1) from January 1, 2000 to August 21, 2001, the S&P 500
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-29A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-29A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-29A1.txt
    • Performance Data, Measure No. 55.1-03 (``Average Installation Interval - DSL - Line Sharing - Requires No Conditioning''), at 271-No. 55.1. In September 2000, SWBT provisioned over 1,700 line shared loops to its separate affiliate in Kansas and over 2,000 line shared loops to its separate affiliate in Oklahoma. See SWBT Chapman Reply Aff. at para. 18. In Oklahoma, SWBT missed 0.5 percent and 0.3 percent of its installation due dates for line shared DSL loops provided to its affiliate in the months of September and October 2000 respectively. During the same period in Kansas, SWBT missed 0.2 percent and 1.2 percent of its installation due dates. See SWBT Aggregated Performance Data, Measure No. 58-09 (``Percent SWBT Caused Missed Due Dates -
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-303A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-303A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-303A1.txt
    • bandwidth indicated. 2Attenuation measured within the transmit band excludes the band ± 35 kHz of the carrier frequency. * * * * * (3) * * * Frequency Offset (normalized to SR) Attenuation (dB) +/-0.75 x SR 0 +/-1.40 x SR 20 +/-2.95 x SR 40 Where: SR = Symbol Rate SR = 1 x channel rate for BPSK SR= 0.5 x channel rate for QPSK * * * * * Section 87.147 is amended by adding paragraph (f) and revising paragraph (d) to read as follows: § 87.147 Authorization of equipment. * * * * * (d) An applicant for certification of equipment intended for transmission in any of the frequency bands listed in paragraph (d)(3) of this section must
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-323A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-323A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-323A1.txt
    • GHz, 23.00-23.55 GHz, and 24.45-24.75 GHz frequency bands, the power flux-density at the Earth's surface produced by emissions from a space station for all conditions and for all methods of modulation shall not exceed the following values: (1) -115 dB (W/m2) in any 1 MHz band for angles of arrival between 0 and 5 degrees above the horizontal plane. (2) -115+0.5 (d-5) dB (W/m2) in any 1 MHz band for angles of arrival d (in degrees) between 5 and 25 degrees above the horizontal plane. (3) -105 dB (W/m2) in any 1 MHz band for angles of arrival between 25 and 90 degrees above the horizontal plane. In addition to the limits specified in paragraph 26.138 of this Part, the power
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-329A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-329A1.txt
    • Syracuse, NY 78 Auburn NY Clear Channel Communications 1949 Feb-00 500 3.9 1.39 B WXBB FM Christian Syracuse, NY 78 DeRuyter NY Clear Channel Communications 1948 Apr-00 0 0 0 B WRCU FM Variety Syracuse, NY 78 Hamilton NY Colgate University 1970 0 0 0 A WDCW AM Christian Syracuse, NY 78 Syracuse NY Crawford Broadcasting Company 1922 Jul-93 0 0.5 0 B WOLF AM Children Syracuse, NY 78 Syracuse NY Fox, Craig 1940 Oct-82 100 0 0 C WVOA FM Christian Syracuse, NY 78 Mexico NY Fox, Craig 1996 Jul-96 250 0 0 A WSIV AM Christian Syracuse, NY 78 E. Syracuse NY Fox, Craig 1955 Sep-96 100 0 0 B WOLF FM Children Syracuse, NY 78 Oswego NY Fox,
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-352A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-352A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-352A1.txt
    • relationship. This, ALLTEL argues, is because ALLTEL's customers call ISPs in other carriers' exchange areas, creating originating minutes, but those ISPs do not call back, therefore ALLTEL does not receive terminating minutes corresponding to these originated Internet calls. For purposes of calculating its DEM factors, ALLTEL applied a one-terminating-minute-to-one-originating-minute relationship only to non-Internet interlocal traffic, and applied a factor of 0.5 to Internet interlocal originating minutes to derive Internet interlocal terminating minutes (i.e., a one-terminating-to-two-originating minutes relationship) over the shared trunks. ALLTEL assigned all originating interlocal traffic, including Internet, plus the lower number of derived interlocal terminating minutes to the local jurisdiction. This decrease in the number of minutes attributed as interlocal terminating minutes reduced the total amount of traffic allocated
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-60A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-60A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-60A1.txt
    • maintained to within ±3 deg. of the values specified on the instrument of authorization. Section 73.68 is amended by revising subsections (a)(2), (d)(2) and (d)(3) to read as follows: § 73.68 Sampling systems for antenna monitors. ***** (a)(2) Sampling lines for directional antennas may be of different lengths provided the phase difference of signals at the monitor are less than 0.5 degree between the shortest and longest cable lengths due to temperature variations to which the system is exposed. ***** (d)(2) Immediately prior to modification or replacement of components of the sampling system, and after a verification that all monitoring point values and operating parameters are within the limits or tolerances specified in the rules, the following indications must be recorded
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-62A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-62A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-62A1.txt
    • Order and deny GNAPs' application for review. DIscussion 3. GNAPs contends that the Bureau ``accepted without examination the [MDTE's] claim that it had mooted Global NAPs' complaint against BA.'' GNAPs also argues that because its preemption petition did not present ``matters which are minor or routine or settled in nature,'' it could not be decided by the Bureau under section 0.5 of our rules. According to GNAPs, the preemption petition did not raise ``minor, routine or settled'' issues. Similarly, because section 252(e)(5) requires a Commission level decision within 90 days, GNAPs contends that the Bureau order represents an attempt to circumvent statutory requirements. 4. Based upon the record in this proceeding, we deny GNAPs' application for review. Our rules make clear
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-102A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-102A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-102A1.txt
    • calling frequencies in the 4000-27500 kHz band which are available for use by authorized ship stations equipped with crystal-controlled oscillators for A1A, J2A, J2B, or J2D radiotelegraphy. There are two series of frequencies for worldwide use and two series of frequencies for each geographic region. Ship stations with synthesized transmitters may operate on every full 100 Hz increment in the 0.5 kHz channel for the frequencies listed, except for 100 Hz above and below those designated for worldwide use. During normal business hours when not communicating on other frequencies, all U.S. coast radiotelegraph stations must monitor the worldwide frequencies and the initial calling frequencies for the region in which it is located. The specific frequencies which must be monitored by a
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-102A1_Erratum.doc
    • calling frequencies in the 4000-27500 kHz band which are available for use by authorized ship stations equipped with crystal-controlled oscillators for A1A, J2A, J2B, or J2D radiotelegraphy. There are two series of frequencies for worldwide use and two series of frequencies for each geographic region. Ship stations with synthesized transmitters may operate on every full 100 Hz increment in the 0.5 kHz channel for the frequencies listed, except for 100 Hz above and below those designated for worldwide use. During normal business hours when not communicating on other frequencies, all U.S. coast radiotelegraph stations must monitor the worldwide frequencies and the initial calling frequencies for the region in which it is located. The specific frequencies which must be monitored by a
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-107A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-107A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-107A1.txt
    • 39.7 channels, and by 2.4 in the noncompetitive group, from 36.3 to 38.7 channels. Table 9. Average Number of BST and CPST Channels, by Category Competitive Group Noncompetitive Group Category of Channel July 2000 July 2001 July 2000 July 2001 Local broadcast stations 10.7 10.9 10.5 10.7 Public, educational, & governmental 1.9 2.0 2.2 2.3 Commercial leased access 0.8 0.8 0.5 0.6 Other local origination 0.7 0.8 0.9 0.9 Total of local channels 14.1 14.5 14.1 14.5 News & general entertainment 36.9 39.7 36.3 38.7 Sports 3.8 3.9 3.3 3.5 Children's 2.7 2.8 2.5 2.6 Total satellite channels 43.4 46.4 42.1 44.8 Total channels on BST and major CPST 57.5 60.9 56.2 59.3 Note: See Attachment C. Annual System Revenues The
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-108A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-108A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-108A1.txt
    • wireline telephone service, the cost would average 28 cents per subscribing household. See n.153, supra. Specifically, a $27 million charge to carriers, converted to a rate increase to 96-98 million residential ratepayers, would average 1.3 cents per month per ratepayer using a relatively rapid amortization period of two years and a relatively high discount rate of 12%; and would average 0.5 cents per month per ratepayer using a relatively slow amortization period of 5 years and a relatively low discount rate of 6%. See ¶ 8, supra. House Report No. 103-827, at 3493. USTA Comments, at 13. See ¶ 60, supra. 47 U.S.C. § 1006(b)(5). Order, supra n.17, at ¶ 12. Because the pleading cycle closed prior to the Commission's decision
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-10A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-10A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-10A1.txt
    • 27, 32, 43, 51, 52, 53, 54, 61, 64, 65, 68, and 90 of Title 47 of the Code of Federal Regulations are amended as follows: PART 0 - COMMISSION ORGANIZATION 1. The authority citation for Part 0 continues to read as follows: AUTHORITY: Secs. 5, 48 Stat. 1068, as amended; 47 U.S.C. 155, 225, unless otherwise noted. 2. Section 0.5 is amended by revising paragraph (a) to read as follows: § 0.5 General description of Commission organization and operations. (a) Principal staff units. The Commission is assisted in the performance of its responsibilities by its staff, which is divided into the following principal units: Office of Managing Director. Office of Engineering and Technology. Office of General Counsel. Office of Plans
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-112A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-112A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-112A1.txt
    • Federal Regulatory, 1401 I Street, N.W., Suite 1100, Washington, D.C. 20005. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION William F. Caton Acting Secretary We note that the Enforcement Bureau issued the Notice of Apparent Liability in this case under its delegated authority, but has now referred the matter to the Commission given the significance of the challenge to the Commission's authority. 47 C.F.R. § 0.5(c) (``the staff is at liberty to refer any matter at any stage to the Commission for action, upon concluding that it involves matters warranting the Commission's consideration''). 47 U.S.C. §§ 218, 403, 154(i), 154(j). SBC Communications, Inc., Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture, 16 FCC Rcd 19370 (2001) (``NAL''). See Oct. 1, 2001 Letter from Charles W. Kelley, Chief, Investigations
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-116A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-116A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-116A1.txt
    • of license. (2) Prior to December 8, 2000, notwithstanding any contrary provisions in this part, the frequency pairs 12.220/12.460 GHz, 12.260/12.500 GHz, 12.300/12.540 GHz and 12.340/12.580 GHz, were authorized for low power, limited coverage systems subject to the following provisions: (1) Maximum equivalent isotropically radiated power (EIRP) shall be 55 dBm; (2) The rated transmitter output power shall not exceed 0.5 watts; (3) Frequency tolerance shall be maintained to within 0.01 percent of the assigned frequency; (4) Maximum beamwidth shall not exceed 4 degrees. However, the sidelobe suppression criteria contained in § 101.115 of this part shall not apply, except that a minimum front-to-back ratio of 38 dB shall apply; (5) Upon showing of need, a maximum bandwidth of 12 MHz
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-136A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-136A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-136A1.txt
    • this band is allocated to the amateur service, operations be limited to electric field antennas, power limited to 2 W EIRP, and interference be defined such that Part 15 devices are considered as not causing interference to any authorized amateur operations. ARRL replies that the typical amateur station EIRP in the 135.7-137.8 kHz band will be on the order of 0.5 W, which is significantly below the power limit used by TI in its analysis, and thus amateur radio operations should not cause interference to RFID systems. ARRL also states that the antenna bandwidth of amateur operations in this band would be ``very low,'' so that adjacent frequency interference is unlikely. ARRL argues that the Commission should not specify antenna types
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-147A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-147A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-147A1.txt
    • for partial migrations is common industry practice). See Georgia Commission GALA I Comments at 103, Louisiana Commission GALA I Comments at 40-45. BellSouth met or exceeded parity with the retail analogue for UNE-P orders in Louisiana for the five-month period and, in Georgia, exceeded parity for February and only missed parity for the five-month period, on average, by less than 0.5 day. See Georgia/Louisiana B.2.1.3.1.1 (Order Completion Interval-Loop + Port Combo/<10 circuits/Dispatch). See Georgia B.2.1.4.1.1 (Order Completion Interval-Combo Other). We note that BellSouth missed the same metric in Louisiana. Competitive LEC volumes, forty orders over a five month period, were not substantial enough, however, to warrant a finding of checklist item noncompliance in light of BellSouth's overall performance. See Louisiana B.2.1.4.1.1
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-157A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-157A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-157A1.txt
    • following table, as measured using a 50 µH/50 ohms line impedance stabilization network (LISN). Compliance with the provisions of this paragraph shall be based on the measurement of the radio frequency voltage between each power line and ground at the power terminal. The lower limit applies at the band edges. Frequency of Emission (MHz) Conducted Limit (dBµV) Quasi-peak Average 0.15-0.5 0.5-5 5-30 66 to 56* 56 60 56 to 46* 46 50 *Decreases with the logarithm of the frequency. (b) For a Class A digital device that is designed to be connected to the public utility (AC) power line, the radio frequency voltage that is conducted back onto the AC power line on any frequency or frequencies within the band 150
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-179A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-179A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-179A1.txt
    • Columbia, Maryland, and Virginia had a total of 4.8 million subscribers. The state-by-state totals for these individual states were inconsistently reported at the end of June 2000 compared to the other filing periods. Source: Local Telephone Competition: Status as of June 30, 2001, Federal Communications Commission, Feb. 2002 (Table 10: Mobile Wireless Telephone Subscribers). Table 3: Economic Area Penetration Rates 0.5 135 Odessa-Midland, TX 150,112 388,007 39% 10.1 129 San Angelo, TX 66,580 202,679 33% 10.1 140 Pueblo, CO-NM 86,666 279,600 31% 8.7 168 Pendleton, OR-WA 60,071 200,681 30% 8.7 154 Flagstaff, AZ-UT 111,854 401,766 28% 8.3 142 Scottsbluff, NE-WY 34,775 92,360 38% 7.8 151 Reno, NV-CA 272,535 670,013 41% 7.6 111 Minot, ND * 111,195 * 7.2 112 Bismarck, ND-MT-SD
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-179A1_Erratum.doc
    • Columbia, Maryland, and Virginia had a total of 4.8 million subscribers. The state-by-state totals for these individual states were inconsistently reported at the end of June 2000 compared to the other filing periods. Source: Local Telephone Competition: Status as of June 30, 2001, Federal Communications Commission, Feb. 2002 (Table 10: Mobile Wireless Telephone Subscribers). Table 3: Economic Area Penetration Rates 0.5 135 Odessa-Midland, TX 150,112 388,007 39% 10.1 129 San Angelo, TX 66,580 202,679 33% 10.1 140 Pueblo, CO-NM 86,666 279,600 31% 8.7 168 Pendleton, OR-WA 60,071 200,681 30% 8.7 154 Flagstaff, AZ-UT 111,854 401,766 28% 8.3 142 Scottsbluff, NE-WY 34,775 92,360 38% 7.8 151 Reno, NV-CA 272,535 670,013 41% 7.6 111 Minot, ND * 111,195 * 7.2 112 Bismarck, ND-MT-SD
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-180A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-180A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-180A1.txt
    • promotes gigabit wireless access as a complement or supplement to optical fiber in urban, suburban, and even rural areas for a range of uses such as internet access or backhaul to cellular or PCS towers. To accomplish these goals, Loea envisions the deployment of highly directional, fixed point-to-point, high millimeter wave systems that would transmit narrow beams (typically less than 0.5 degrees beamwidth) with large bandwidths (of 5 GHz) along straight paths to cover relatively short distances (of 10 miles or less). Loea also contends that the technical characteristics of such systems allow for the operation of a vast number of users and paths in any given geographical area. Further, Endwave contends that high millimeter wave systems would be more cost
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-201A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-201A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-201A1.txt
    • for Reconsideration and Motion to Reopen the Record filed by Preston Small IS DENIED. 4. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, That this proceeding IS TERMINATED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Marlene H. Dortch Secretary Anniston and Ashland, Alabama, and College Park, Covington, Milledgeville and Social Circle, Georgia, 16 FCC Rcd 19857 (2001). 16 FCC Rcd 3411 (M.M. Bur. 2001). See 47 C.F.R. § 0.5(c) (Commission may instruct the staff to refer any matter to it for action). Eatonton and Sandy Springs, Georgia,and Anniston and Lineville, Alabama, 6 FCC Rcd 6580 (M.B. Bur. 1991) (subsequent history omitted). See 47 C.F.R. § 1.106(k)(3) (ruling denying reconsideration may not be treated as modification of original order and therefore such ruling is not subject to further reconsideration). See
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-218A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-218A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-218A1.txt
    • * Frequency Band (MHz) Maximum allowable EIRP (1)(2) Fixed (dBW) Mobile (dBW) * * * * * * * * * 10,550 to 10,600 (5) +55 . . . . 10,600 to 10,680 (5) +40 * * * * * * * * * * * * (5) The output power of a DEMS System nodal transmitter shall not exceed 0.5 watt per 250 kHz. The output power of a DEMS System user transmitter shall not exceed 0.04 watt per 250 kHz. The transmitter power in terms of the watts specified is the peak envelope power of the emission measured at the associated antenna input port. The operating power shall not exceed the authorized power by more than 10 percent of
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-23A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-23A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-23A1.txt
    • given in Table N. These limits relate to the power flux-density which would be obtained under assumed free-space conditions. Table N: Limits of power-flux density from space stations in the band 6700-7075 MHz Frequency band Limit in dB(W/m2) for angle of arrival (() above the horizontal plane Reference bandwidth 00 -50 50 -250 250 -900 6700-6825 MHz -137 -137 + 0.5((-5) -127 1 MHz 6825-7075 MHz -154 and -134 -154 + 0.5((-5) and -134 + 0.5((-5) -144 and -124 4 kHz 1 MHz * * * * * PART 87--AVIATION SERVICES 7. The authority citation for Part 87 continues to read as follows: AUTHORITY: 48 Stat. 1066, 1082, as amended; 47 U.S.C. 154, 303, 307(e) unless otherwise noted. Interpret or apply
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-243A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-243A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-243A1.txt
    • Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20554 In the Matter of ) ) Amendment of Section 0.5 of ) the Commission's Rules Relating to ) Compliance with Federal Financial ) Management Requirements ) ORDER Adopted: August 28, 2002; Released: September 10, 2002 By the Commission: . In the course of carrying out its responsibilities, the Commission is subject to a number of financially related requirements, including the Federal Debt Collection Improvement Act of 1996 and implementing regulations
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-257A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-257A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-257A1.txt
    • -14 dBW/4 kHz and the maximum transmitted satellite carrier EIRP density does not exceed +6.0 dBW/4 kHz." 47 C.F.R. § 25.212(c). Section 25.212(d) states: "In the [conventional C-band], an earth station with an equivalent diameter of 4.5 meters or greater may be routinely licensed for transmission of SCPC services if the maximum power densities into the antenna do not exceed +0.5 dBW/4 kHz for analog SCPC carriers with bandwidths up to 200 kHz, and do not exceed -2.7 dBW/4 kHz for narrow and/or wideband digital SCPC carriers." 47 C.F.R. § 25.212(d). In the Notice, we also proposed a number of revisions to Sections 25.211 and 25.212. See Notice, FCC 00-435, 15 FCC Rcd at 25187 (App. B). We expect, however, that
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-257A1_Erratum.doc
    • -14 dBW/4 kHz and the maximum transmitted satellite carrier EIRP density does not exceed +6.0 dBW/4 kHz." 47 C.F.R. § 25.212(c). Section 25.212(d) states: "In the [conventional C-band], an earth station with an equivalent diameter of 4.5 meters or greater may be routinely licensed for transmission of SCPC services if the maximum power densities into the antenna do not exceed +0.5 dBW/4 kHz for analog SCPC carriers with bandwidths up to 200 kHz, and do not exceed -2.7 dBW/4 kHz for narrow and/or wideband digital SCPC carriers." 47 C.F.R. § 25.212(d). In the Notice, we also proposed a number of revisions to Sections 25.211 and 25.212. See Notice, FCC 00-435, 15 FCC Rcd at 25187 (App. B). We expect, however, that
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-27A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-27A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-27A1.txt
    • fixed station frequencies." International footnote 480 would be replaced with S5.89, missing footnote NG128 would be added to the band 535-1605 kHz, and various United States footnotes would be placed in both the Federal and non-Federal Government Tables. , supra. See 47 C.F.R. § 74.402(a). See 47 C.F.R. § 80.361(a). There are 20 frequencies within the band 26101-26110.5 kHz (in 0.5 kHz steps) that are available for assignment to public coast stations for NBDP and data transmissions. See 47 C.F.R. § 80.363 (a)(2). We note that this rule section describes the "exclusive" maritime mobile HF frequency bands that are available for assignment to coast stations using 3 kHz channels for facsimile, and that within the reallocated band 26100-26175 kHz, the sub-band
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-286A2.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-286A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-286A2.txt
    • transmission facilities Level II: Non-GPS-locked transmission facilities Normally, transmission facilities will operate as Level I facilities in order to support numerous advanced system features. Analog Diversity Delay a level of -6 dB from full scale will be applied to both the analog and digital transmit signal paths. The tone will be a pulsed signal, consisting of a repeating pattern of 0.5 seconds on followed by 4.5 seconds off. RF Carrier Frequency and OFDM Symbol Clock For synchronization Level I transmission facilities, the absolute accuracy of the carrier frequency and OFDM symbol clock frequency will be maintained to within 1 part per 108 at all times. For synchronization Level II transmission facilities, the absolute accuracy of the carrier frequency and OFDM symbol
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-286A3.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-286A3.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-286A3.txt
    • ansmission facilities. Diversity delay accuracy will be verified with a calibrated test receiver receiving the RF channel under test. A digitally generated 4-kHz sinusoidal test tone at a level of -6 dB from full scale will be applied to both the analog and digital transmit signal paths. The tone will be a pulsed signal, consisting of a repeating pattern of 0.5 seconds on, followed by 4.5 seconds off. Time and Frequency Accuracy and Stability The total modulation symbol-clock frequency absolute error shall be budgeted according to the following requirements: For the entire end-to-end system: ±101 ppm maximum Caused by the receive system: ±100 ppm maximum Caused by the broadcast system: ±1 ppm maximum for synchronization Level I facilities ±.01 ppm maximum
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-308A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-308A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-308A1.txt
    • 839 F.2d 768 (D.C. Cir. 1988) (en banc) (Wolfe), and letter to Bill McConnell, Broadcasting & Cable, from Managing Director Fishel (FOIA Control No. 21-095) (May 2, 2001) (withholding the Daily Circulate Reports pursuant to FOIA Exemption 5). Decision at 1-2. Letter from Michael Ravnitzky to Office of General Counsel (Aug. 20, 2002) (Application for Review). See 47 C.F.R. § 0.5(d) (``In appropriate circumstances, Commission action may be taken in between meetings `by circulation' which involves the submission of a document to each of the Commissioners for his approval.''). Wolfe, 839 F.2d at 771. Id. Id. at 774. Id. at 775. Id. Id. at 776, citing Coastal States Gas Corp. v. Department of Energy, 617 F.2d 854, 866 (D.C. Cir. 1980).
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-331A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-331A1.txt
    • would always occur if the correction would shift a performance measures from ``in parity'' to ``out of parity.'' Key measures that have been out of parity would be reposted if there were at least 100 competitive LEC transactions at the sub-metric level, and there was at least a two percentage point change in the performance for benchmark measures or a 0.5 change in the z-score for retail analogue measures. See Letter from Jonathan B. Banks, General Attorney, BellSouth, to Marlene H. Dortch, Secretary, Federal Communications Commission, WC Docket No. 02-307 Attach. at 1-2 (filed Oct. 17, 2002) (BellSouth Oct. 17 Ex Parte Letter ­ #3). 44 BellSouth Reply at 30-31; BellSouth Varner Reply Aff. at para. 23; BellSouth Varner Reply Aff.,
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-33A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-33A1.txt
    • cost of transporting Internet traffic from an Internet Service Provider to an Internet Backbone Provider, concluded that the provision of high-speed DSL Internet service may not be economically viable in many rural areas for rural telephone carriers.279 In particular, the study indicates that estimated revenue shortfalls may actually increase with higher market penetration, rising from $9.7 million per year at 0.5 percent penetration to $33.6 million per year at 5 percent penetration.280 The decision of Regional Bell Operating Companies (RBOCs) to sell numerous rural local exchanges may be consistent with this trend. Other carriers, however, appear prepared to serve rural or less-dense communities and, analysts believe, these carriers are more likely to make the necessary capital investments to upgrade networks so
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-43A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-43A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-43A1.txt
    • sufficient. Increasing the interstate revenue threshold from eight percent to 12 percent to qualify for the limited international revenues exception will exclude only slightly more international revenues from the contribution base. Based on revenue data reported for the third quarter of 2001, Commission staff projects that increasing the interstate revenue threshold to 12 percent would result in less than a 0.5 percent reduction in the contribution base. The relatively small amount of additional international revenue that will be excluded from the contribution base should not dramatically affect the level of the quarterly contribution factor or the ability of providers to meet their contribution obligations. We decline to increase the threshold above 12 percent or to exclude international revenues from the contribution
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-48A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-48A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-48A1.txt
    • in land-based applications. In this conservative operational scenario one half of the total allowable interference budget is allotted to UWB devices and the other half is allotted to all other interfering sources combined. The factor for UWB device interference allotment is computed from 10 Log (UWB interference allotment ratio). For a UWB device interference allotment of 50% (a ratio of 0.5), a 3 dB factor is included in this analysis. One commenter argued against including a factor for interference allotment in the analysis. However, their argument is at odds with their other comments, wherein they acknowledge that there may be sources of interference such as incidental and unintentional radiators, as well as licensed transmitters with spurious emissions in the GPS bands.
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-52A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-52A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-52A1.txt
    • transaction will not result in public interest harms, warrants grant of the underlying applications. We find that Nassau's operation of WNJO(FM) has considerably improved that station's performance. As Press admitted in its earlier filings, Nassau's operation of WNJO(FM), in particular its decision to change the format of the station, has resulted in a substantial increase in the station's listenership from 0.5 percent audience share in 1997 to a current audience share of 4.4 percent. Indeed, a substantial part of the market concentration concern that surrounds the proposed transaction is the result of Nassau's successful operation of the WNJO(FM). Although we disagree with Nassau that this fact compels us to grant its applications, we believe that it is appropriate for us consider
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02J-2A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02J-2A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02J-2A1.txt
    • used cluster analysis to identify groups of states that had similar cost characteristics, thereby warranting different treatment regarding universal service support. Specifically, states were sorted from lowest- to highest-cost based on statewide average cost per loop. Clusters were identified in this ranking if the difference in average costs between states was greater than ``cluster split differences'' ranging from 2.5 to 0.5. Under this analysis, Mississippi was the first to break out into a separate cluster, and the second was the District of Columbia. The first group of states to break out into a separate rural, high-cost cluster included Kentucky, Maine, Alabama, Vermont, Montana, West Virginia and Wyoming. The remaining states, ranging from New Jersey to Nebraska, formed a separate urban, low-cost
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-127A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-127A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-127A1.txt
    • of FCC MOWG Study No. 8 provides information on Internet access. Respondents who said they have home access to the Internet were asked a follow-up question regarding how they access the Internet. The answers (in percentages) were as follows: cable line 18.9 percent, DSL line 14.7 percent, telephone line 66.1 percent, other 3.5 percent, don't know 5.9 percent, and refuse 0.5 percent. The responses sum to 109.6 percent. If we take the 99.7 percent of respondents who picked cable, DSL, or telephone line as the base, and if we combine telephone and DSL, the resulting shares are 19 percent cable and 81 percent telephone. We recognize that, given the relatively small share of Internet in the total diversity market (12.5% weight),
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-136A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-136A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-136A1.txt
    • 0.21 0.19 0.25 0.17 ATTACHMENT 7 Average Number of Channels By Category of Programming† Competitive Group Noncompetitive Group Number of Channels Annual Change Number of Channels Annual Change Category July 2001 July 2002 Number Percent July 2001 July 2002 Number Percent BST and Major CPST Channel Lineup Local broadcast 11.0 11.2 0.2 1.8% 11.4 11.7 0.3 2.6% Standard error 0.4 0.5 0.4 0.4 Public, educational, and government 2.1 2.2 0.1 4.8% 2.8 2.8 0.0 0.0% Standard error 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 Leased access 0.8 0.8 0.0 0.0% 0.8 0.9 0.1 12.5% Standard error 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.1 Other local 1.0 1.2 0.2 20.0% 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0% Standard error 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.1 Satellite sports 4.5 4.6 0.1 2.2% 4.0 4.3
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-15A4.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-15A4.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-15A4.txt
    • Margin (dB) 0.0 0.0 Table 3.2.C shows that a separation distance of 820 m is required to protect the space operations receiver from an ATC BS. If the ATC system is limited to the Forward Link mode of operations there would be no MTs adjacent to the 2200-2290 MHz band. The BS would have to be within 0.82 km, or 0.5 miles, of the space operations receiver to cause interference. This distance should be within the controlled area of many United States Earth station facilities. If a space operations earth station is associated with a non-controlled area, the pointing direction of the earth station antenna would become important in determining whether or not interference would occur. If the antenna is pointed
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-15A4_Erratum.doc
    • Margin (dB) 0.0 0.0 Table 3.2.C shows that a separation distance of 820 m is required to protect the space operations receiver from an ATC BS. If the ATC system is limited to the Forward Link mode of operations there would be no MTs adjacent to the 2200-2290 MHz band. The BS would have to be within 0.82 km, or 0.5 miles, of the space operations receiver to cause interference. This distance should be within the controlled area of many United States Earth station facilities. If a space operations earth station is associated with a non-controlled area, the pointing direction of the earth station antenna would become important in determining whether or not interference would occur. If the antenna is pointed
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-164A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-164A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-164A1.txt
    • the economy as a whole. This productivity offset became known as the ``X-factor'' and was applied to reduce the rates in each of the service groups, or ``price cap baskets,'' of the price cap LECs. The productivity factor initially adopted in the LEC Price Cap Order included a component based on historical LEC productivity, and an additional productivity obligation of 0.5 percent as a consumer productivity dividend (CPD) to ensure that consumers shared in the anticipated productivity gains in the form of lower rates. The Commission prescribed two productivity factors: a minimum 3.3 percent factor and an optional 4.3 percent factor. Price cap LECs that opted to use the higher 4.3 percent productivity factor were allowed to retain larger shares of
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-165A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-165A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-165A1.txt
    • area is prohibited by the analog TV stations in TABLE 1 that are currently in operation: TABLE 1 TV Stations that block the use of the 700 MHz band in New York City Channel# City Co/adj Distance to NYC 63 Newton, NJ co 36 miles 64 Philadelphia, PA co 81 miles 67 Smithtown adj 55 miles 68 Newark, NJ co 0.5 miles 69 Allentown, PA co 77 miles In the Fifth Report and Order the Commission set ``a target of 2006 for the cessation of analog service''. That was subsequently modified to allow delay until ``2006 or the date by which 85% of the television households in a licensee's market are capable of receiving the signals of digital broadcast stations, whichever
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-222A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-222A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-222A1.txt
    • a rural 800 MHz cellular system, we found that increasing the base station power by 10 percent (500 W ERP to 550 W ERP) and 20 percent (500 W ERP to 600 W ERP) increased the base station range by 1.5 km (0.93 mi) and 3 km (1.86 mi) respectively. We note, however, that our calculations show that a typical 0.5 W ERP mobile unit would not have sufficient range to reach the base station from the edge of the base station coverage area regardless of whether the base station power is 500 (maximum under the rules today), 550, or 600 W ERP. Similarly, in the case of a rural 1,900 MHz PCS system, we found that increasing the base station
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-238A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-238A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-238A1.txt
    • products within a 30 kHz measurement bandwidth) shall be 10 dB above the power limit in this table. * * * * * (3) * * * Frequency Offset (normalized to SR) Attenuation (dB) +/-0.75 x SR 0 +/-1.40 x SR 20 +/-2.95 x SR 40 Where: SR = Symbol Rate SR = 1 x channel rate for BPSK SR= 0.5 x channel rate for QPSK * * * * * Section 87.145 is amended by removing paragraph (c)(1) and redesignating paragraphs (c)(2) through (c)(5) as paragraphs (c)(1) through (c)(4). Section 87.147 is amended by adding paragraph (f) and revising paragraphs (d), (d)(1), and (e) to read as follows: § 87.147 Authorization of equipment. * * * * * (d) An
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-249A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-249A1.pdf
    • of Columbia and Puerto Rico), or 15% of the jurisdictions.'') Id. at 20730, para. 36. Id. at 20730-31, para. 37. Id. (``Specifically, states were sorted from lowest- to highest-cost based on statewide average cost per loop. Clusters were identified in this ranking if the difference in average costs between states was greater than `cluster split differences' ranging from 2.5 to 0.5. Under this analysis, Mississippi was the first to break out into a separate cluster, and the second was the District of Columbia. The first group of states to break out into a separate rural, high-cost cluster included Kentucky, Maine, Alabama, Vermont, Montana, West Virginia and Wyoming. The remaining states, ranging from New Jersey to Nebraska, formed a separate urban, low-cost
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-268A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-268A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-268A1.txt
    • (File No. BMPH-19950127JA) and assignment of that permit to Southern (File No. BAPH-19941209GK) should be rescinded, and responsive and supplemental pleadings; and (2) Piedmont's October 29, 1998, Application for Review concerning the grant of a permit to Southern to upgrade the station's constructed facilities from Class A to Class C2 (File No BMPH-19960307IC), and responsive pleadings. See 47 C.F.R. § 0.5(c). See also, Nassau Community College, 12 FCC Rcd 12234, n.1 (1997); Little Rock Radio Telephone Co., Inc., 50 R.R.2d 1535 (1982) (referring cases to Commission when cases involving the same facts, parties, or issues are pending before the Commission). The related matters referred to us in the present case are (1) Piedmont's November 14, 1996, complaint, which alleges that Southern's
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-286A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-286A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-286A1.txt
    • stations that have diameters of five meters or less in the 14 GHz band if the maximum power into the antenna does not exceed 500 watts (27 dBW). Section 25.212(d) permits streamlined licensing for earth stations in the 6 GHz band that are 4.5 meters in diameter or greater if the maximum power densities into the antenna do not exceed +0.5dBW/4 kHz, and do not exceed -2.7dBW/4 kHz for narrow and/or wideband SCPC carriers. 47 C.F.R. § 25.212(d). We note, in this regard, that the WRC-03 adopted both off axis-EIRP limits on C-band ESVs to protect adjacent FSS satellite systems. The CSAT rules to which the text refers are more stringent than the limits adopted by the WRC-03 and will provide
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-289A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-289A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-289A1.txt
    • signal; Directional antennas for fixed devices that provide, on average, attenuation of 22 dB relative to the main lobe in the direction of the satellite; at angles ranging between 30 and 100-degrees off-axis from the transmission centerline; and 0 1000 2000 4000 Device Distribution % 30 35 20 5 5 5 % simultaneous transmissions at specified EIRP 3.0 3.5 2.0 0.5 5 5 The following sample link budget analyses are based on the assumptions above. 500 Part 15 Reuse Bandwidths in FSS Band MHz 11.67 25.00 Alternate Polarizations # 2 2 Total number of unlicensed systems within CONUS 53,369,095 369,916,129 SEPARATE STATEMENT OF CHAIRMAN MICHAEL K. POWELL Re: Establishment of Interference Temperature Metric to Quantify and Manage Interference and to Expand
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-28A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-28A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-28A1.txt
    • Table 1, along with pertinent specifications. A block diagram showing the measurement equipment configuration used in the subsequent compliance tests is provided in Figure 1. Table 1. List of Measurement Equipment. DESCRIPTION MANUFACTURER MODEL SERIAL NUMBER FREQUENCY RANGE (GHz) PSA Spectrum Analyzer Agilent E4448A US42070179 0.000003-50.0 Swept CW Signal Generator Agilent 83650L 3844A00650 0.01-50.0 Low Noise Pre-Amp Hewlett-Packard HP83017A 3611A01199 0.5-26.5 Low Noise Pre-Amp Miteq AFS3-01000200-06-10P-6 856403 1.0-2.0 Double Ridge Guide Horn Antenna A.H. Systems, Inc. SAS-200/571 387 0.7-18.0 Coaxial Cable Times Wire and Cable LMR-400 - < 16.2 . Block Diagram of Measurement System. The PSA spectrum analyzer incorporates a true root-mean-square (RMS) detector and was used to perform all radiated emissions measurements above 960 MHz. The specific analyzer settings
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-296A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-296A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-296A1.txt
    • service rules. (r) In the band 40.0- 40.5 GHz, the power flux-density at the Earth's surface produced by emissions from a space station for all conditions and for all methods of modulation shall not exceed the following values: -115 dB(W/m2) in any 1 MHz band for angles of arrival between 0 and 5 degrees above the horizontal plane; -115 + 0.5 ((-5) dB(W/m2) in any 1 MHz band for angles of arrival ( (in degrees) between 5 and 25 degrees above the horizontal plane; and -105 dB(W/m2) in any 1 MHz band for angles of arrival between 25 and 90 degrees above the horizontal plane; These limits relate to the power flux-density that would be obtained under assumed free-space propagation conditions.
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-33A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-33A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-33A1.txt
    • in emergency circumstances. Any equipment located within 2.2 meters of the UWB operator also would be under the control of that operator. Vehicular radar systems and hand held (outdoor) UWB devices are permitted to place emissions in the PCS band at a level of -63.3 dBm, resulting in a decrease to the maximum separation distance of 68 percent, i.e., to 0.5 meters. The above example demonstrates that the emissions from nearby UWB devices will not cause harmful interference to PCS operation even when the background noise level and the received signal level from a PCS system are at such extremes that there is insufficient margin to accommodate naturally occurring multipath signals. However, we recognize that the petitioners may object to our
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-38A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-38A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-38A1.txt
    • treats identical interference-creating proposals in radically differing ways based on whether an application was filed in a window. We find no basis in either the AM Improvement Proceeding or the adoption of window filing auction procedures to infer an intent to adopt such an approach. 12. Mutual exclusivity and community coverage are important but distinct licensing standards. An AM station's 0.5 mV/m daytime contour must be protected. In addition, the station must place a 5.0 mV/m daytime ``city grade'' contour over its community of license. At night, an AM station must cover eighty percent of its community of license with its NIF contour. We agree with Petitioners that two applications are mutually exclusive when one application would raise a second application's
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-88A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-88A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-88A1.txt
    • into the analysis, Radio South would have a 37.4 percent post-transaction revenue share and the two-firm revenue concentration would remain at 94.9 percent. WSPZ(AM)'s financial condition is further discussed infra ¶¶ 34-37. The shares do not total 100 percent because BIA data does not include shares for non-commercial stations or very small shares of any stations, i.e., shares less than 0.5 percent. The Cox Radio-owned WBHJ(FM) is licensed to Tuscaloosa but is home to the larger Birmingham metro. In the Spring 2002 ratings period, WBHJ(FM) had a 12.6 percent audience share in the Tuscaloosa metro, larger than any station home to the Tuscaloosa metro. Horizontal Merger Guidelines, § 1.51. See Great Empire Broadcasting, Inc., 14 FCC Rcd 11145, 11150 (1999). The
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-97A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-97A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-97A1.txt
    • each month by the Commission. A meeting subject to the Act is one where at least a quorum of Commissioners jointly conducts or disposes of agency business. Petitioners state, incorrectly, that the Second R&O was adopted at an open meeting on April 11, 2002. In fact, however, the item was adopted by circulation - as provided for in 47 C.F.R. 0.5(d) of our rules. When we adopt an item by circulation, each Commissioner's vote is sequentially noted by an internal tracking system. Sequential, notational voting (circulation voting) by Commissioners is not prohibited by the Sunshine Act since the Act applies to any meetings that are held - but does not require that meetings be held. Furthermore, we note that separate consideration
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-119A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-119A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-119A1.txt
    • at 1556 and n.37. Implementation of Section 309(j) of the Communications Act-Competitive Bidding for Commercial Broadcast and Instructional Television Fixed Services Licenses (``Broadcast First Report and Order''), 13 FCC Rcd 15920, 15964-65 (1998); recon denied, 14 FCC Rcd 8724 (1999); modified, 14 FCC Rcd 12541 (1999). 47 C.F.R. § 73.3568(a)(1). The daytime populations listed are those encompassed within each proposal's 0.5 mV/m contour. See supra note 17. We consider five or more services to be ``abundant.'' Family Broadcasting Group, 53 RR2d 662 (Rev. Bd. 1983), rev. denied FCC 83-559 (Nov. 29, 1983), see also LaGrange and Rollingwood, Texas, 10 FCC Rcd 3337 (1995). 59 RR2d 730 (1986), aff'd without opinion sub nom. Plantation Broadcasting Corp. v. F.C.C., 812 F.2d 1443 (D.C.
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-120A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-120A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-120A1.txt
    • for new service.'' 5. Neither Nelson nor D&E proposes either first or second aural service, nor do they propose first local transmission service to their respective communities. Therefore, the Bureau properly considered their applications under Priority (4), ``other public interest matters.'' It found that D&E would serve ten percent more listeners, based on a comparison of the respective parties' proposed 0.5 mV/m daytime contours. The Bureau further found that D&E would serve 24,616 persons in its nighttime interference-free contour, compared to 6,942 persons to be served under Nelson's proposal. The Bureau found these differences to be dispositive, justifying a Section 307(b) preference for D&E's proposal. 6. We find no error in the Bureau's use of population coverage, i.e., the number of
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-134A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-134A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-134A1.txt
    • which is approximately equal to Globalstar's stated ratio of 1.4. Table C.1 - CDMA Uplink Link Budget Column A Column B Unit Number of Users 148 28 Frequency 1615 1615 MHz Range 1740 1740 Km Receive Noise Temperature 500 500 K Receiver Noise Density -201.6 -201.6 dBW/Hz Receiver Bandwidth 1.23 1.23 MHz Date Rate 4.8 4.8 Kbps Channel Activity Factor 0.5 0.5 # Nominal Max User EIRP 0.0 0.0 dBW Spreading Loss -161.4 -161.4 dB Received Wanted Signal Level -161.4 -161.4 dBW Receive Antenna Gain 15.7 15.7 dB User Signal @ Satellite Receiver -145.7 -145.7 dBW Average Data Rate 2.4 2.4 Kbps Energy per Bit (Eb) -179.5 -179.5 dBW/Hz Interference Power -124.6 -131.9 dBW Spreading BW 1.23 1.23 MHz Spreading BW
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-147A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-147A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-147A1.txt
    • familiar with the satellite industry, and based on those discussions, SES Americom believes that the costs of the bond will be up to 3 or 4 percent of the bond amount. SES Americom Reply at 4-5. See also EchoStar Ex Parte Statement at 1-3 (costs of bond are one to three percent of face value of bond, plus 0.4 to 0.5 percent in cases where surety company requires 100 percent collateral in form of irrevocable letter of credit). EchoStar claims that such a letter of credit requirement is typical. EchoStar Ex Parte Statement at 2. Joint Commenters Petition at 13-14. See also Space Imaging Comments at 5. Joint Commenters Petition at 14. Joint Commenters Petition at 14. See also SES Americom
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-147A1_Erratum.doc
    • familiar with the satellite industry, and based on those discussions, SES Americom believes that the costs of the bond will be up to 3 or 4 percent of the bond amount. SES Americom Reply at 4-5. See also EchoStar Ex Parte Statement at 1-3 (costs of bond are one to three percent of face value of bond, plus 0.4 to 0.5 percent in cases where surety company requires 100 percent collateral in form of irrevocable letter of credit). EchoStar claims that such a letter of credit requirement is typical. EchoStar Ex Parte Statement at 2. Joint Commenters Petition at 13-14. See also Space Imaging Comments at 5. Joint Commenters Petition at 14. Joint Commenters Petition at 14. See also SES Americom
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-151A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-151A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-151A1.txt
    • the carrier's earnings in year 2. Over time, effective earnings could fall below the benchmark levels that the Commission established as an integral part of its initial price cap regulatory regime. For example, the LECs' unadjusted 1993 rates of return used to compute 1994 sharing and lower-end adjustments would on average be 0.2 percent higher at the upper end, and 0.5 percent lower at the low end than if adjusted. The add-back adjustment, however, corrects these deviations and ensures that the LECs' earnings fall within the range the Commission selected in the LEC Price Cap Order. 47 U.S.C. § 204. Add-back requires price cap LECs, in calculating their current year interstate rates of return, to add back or subtract from their
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-155A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-155A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-155A1.txt
    • the Association for Community Education, Inc. for license to cover the modified construction permit for FM translator station K211DK IS GRANTED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Marlene H. Dortch Secretary SMCCD is the license of NCE-FM station KCRW(FM), Santa Monica, California. Letter to John S. Neely, Esq. and Harold K. McCombs, Esq., (M.M. Bur. Nov. 1, 2001). Pursuant to 47 C.F.R. Section 0.5(c), the Bureau has referred the license application to the Commission as a matter of administrative convenience. One of the issues raised in the application for review is properly considered only in the context of the K211DK license application. File No. BPFT-19960910TB. 47 C.F.R. § 74.1204(f) reads as follows: An application for an FM translator station will not be accepted for
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-168A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-168A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-168A1.txt
    • from a cell site, the free space loss for antennas mounted at 61 meters (200 feet) AGL and 6 meters (20 feet) AGL differs by only 0.17 dB, calculated as follows: The distance (D) over a straight line from a receiving antenna to the radiation center of the transmitting antenna is defined for particular heights (H) by (D² + H²) 0.5. The path loss over the distance (D) is defined by 53.3 + 20 log(Dmeters) + 20 log (FMHz). Thus, for example, given an antenna having a 10 degree 3 dB beamwidth, the main beam of the antenna will intersect the ground at 1134 feet from the cell when mounted on a 200 foot tower, but only at 113 feet from
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-168A1_Erratum.doc
    • from a cell site, the free space loss for antennas mounted at 61 meters (200 feet) AGL and 6 meters (20 feet) AGL differs by only 0.17 dB, calculated as follows: The distance (D) over a straight line from a receiving antenna to the radiation center of the transmitting antenna is defined for particular heights (H) by (D² + H²) 0.5. The path loss over the distance (D) is defined by 53.3 + 20 log(Dmeters) + 20 log (FMHz). Thus, for example, given an antenna having a 10 degree 3 dB beamwidth, the main beam of the antenna will intersect the ground at 1134 feet from the cell when mounted on a 200 foot tower, but only at 113 feet from
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-196A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-196A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-196A1.txt
    • FURTHER ORDERED, that a copy of this Memorandum Opinion and Order shall be sent by Certified Mail Return Receipt Requested to Lara Mahaney, Director of Corporate and Entertainment Affairs, Parents Television Council, 325 South Patrick Street, Alexandria, VA 23114. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Marlene H. Dortch Secretary The Enforcement Bureau has referred this matter to the full Commission pursuant to Section 0.5(c) of the Rules. 47 C.F.R. § 0.5(c)(2002). This Memorandum Opinion and Order denies a complaint the Commission received concerning broadcasts of this program. See 18 U.S.C. § 1464 (2002), and 47 C.F.R. § 73.3999 (2002). See Letter to David Solomon, Chief, Enforcement Bureau, from Lara Mahaney, Director of Corporate and Entertainment Affairs, Parents Television Council, dated August 22, 2003 (``Complaint'').
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-220A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-220A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-220A1.txt
    • to implement some form of power output limit on this equipment. This power limit should be based on a sample taken at the output of the mask filter. Automatic gain control should be permitted in digital translators.'' For equipment placed into service after these rules are adopted, he recommends that the power output variation be limited to no more than 0.5 dB. As a condition for permitting the digital conversion of analog translators, Riverton recommends limiting output power variations to +/- 1 dB ``for an input increase of 20 dB, and a decrease of 10 dB when the translator has been optimized for digital transmission.'' Regarding other standards issues, Greg Best proposes that we limit the translator frequency tolerance to +/-
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-246A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-246A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-246A1.txt
    • receiver, and GR is the isotropic gain (in dB) of the receive antenna (in dB). For a typical BAS ENG TV Pickup receiver, as described in the DOD IMT-2000 Assessment at ¶¶ B.7.2.2.1 and C.6.1.1.1, with a bandwidth of 17 MHz, a noise figure of 3 dB, an (I/N) of -9 dB (to avert a receiver noise threshold degradation exceeding 0.5 dB), a lineloss of 2 dB, and an isotropic antenna gain of 22 dB (main beam, no sidelobe suppression), the above expression yields a MAXRXI of -157.7 dBW. We adjust this figure downward 1.5 dB, to account for the 12 MHz receiver bandwidth consistent with the new BAS channel plan, to -159.2 dBW. The above-calculated RXI's of the DOD TT&C
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-255A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-255A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-255A1.txt
    • internet access, telecommunications equipment, and directory publishing. See id. at 6. Id. at 1. On January 1, 1984, SBC was spun off from AT&T Corp. as a result of a 1982 antitrust consent decree. See id. Id. at 3. Id. at 1. Id. Id. at 4. SBC serves 28.8 million retail consumer, 18.3 million retail business, 7.1 million wholesale, and 0.5 million other access lines. See id. Id. Id. at 5. SBC has a total of 14.4 million long distance lines and is capable of offering long distance service in fifty states. See SBC Communications Inc., 2003 Annual Report, at 2 (``SBC Annual Report''), available at http://www.sbc.com/investor_relations/company_reports_and_sec_filings/20 03_AR.pdf (visited July 22, 2004). SBC Annual Report at 2. SBC 10-K at 2.
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-285A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-285A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-285A1.txt
    • with the caveat that the total EIRP must be reduced by 20 log (50 MHz/instantaneously occupied bandwidth) dB. Siemens notes that some systems would have as much as a 6 dB measurement penalty on the peak level by basing the power limit on the 20 log (RBW/50) proposed by the Commission, but states that this error would be reduced below 0.5 dB if the RBW is based on the -10 dB bandwidth of the emission. Alternatively, Siemens VDO suggests that the Commission adopt a peak limit of -28 dBm/MHz. James Page states that peak signals can cause more interference in some systems and requests that all peak emissions be limited to -34 dBm/MHz. Delphi opposes as inappropriate the proposal from MSSI
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-286A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-286A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-286A1.txt
    • Ku-band spectrum more accessible and reliable, we view the Ku-band as an ideal operational environment for future ESV growth, particularly for use on inland waterways. In both the C- and Ku-bands, we require ESV operators to protect FSS incumbents through limits on off-axis effective isotropically radiated power (e.i.r.p.) density and to cease operations if the ESV antenna drifts more than 0.5 degrees from the target satellite. We also require operators in both bands to collect and maintain vessel tracking data to assist in identifying and resolving sources of interference. In addition, we add footnotes to the U.S. Table of Frequency Allocations to recognize ESVs as an application of the FSS with primary status. In doing so, we implement, in part, the
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-286A1_Erratum.doc
    • Ku-band spectrum more accessible and reliable, we view the Ku-band as an ideal operational environment for future ESV growth, particularly for use on inland waterways. In both the C- and Ku-bands, we require ESV operators to protect FSS incumbents through limits on off-axis effective isotropically radiated power (e.i.r.p.) density and to cease operations if the ESV antenna drifts more than 0.5 degrees from the target satellite. We also require operators in both bands to collect and maintain vessel tracking data to assist in identifying and resolving sources of interference. In addition, we add footnotes to the U.S. Table of Frequency Allocations to recognize ESVs as an application of the FSS with primary status. In doing so, we implement, in part, the
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-294A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-294A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-294A1.txt
    • category, and then applied to the MHz-pop figures for each category the MHz-pops formulas that were used in the 800 MHz R&O (i.e., $1.70 per MHz-pop for contiguous and GX spectrum, $1.49 per MHz-pop for interleaved spectrum), yielding the results in the table below: MHz POPs Value MHz POP Actual Value NPSPAC Spectrum 6.00 285,620,445 $ 1.70 $2,913,328,539 Restricted Use (0.5) 285,620,445 $ 1.70 ($242,777,378) Guard Band (2.00) 247,051,622 $ 1.70 ($839,975,515) Nextel Upper Channel Gain 3.50 1,831,000,000 General Category (4.51) 285,620,445 $ 1.70 ($2,188,000,000) SMR Interleaved (2.96) 285,620,445 $ 1.49 ($1,258,000,000) B/ILT Interleaved (1.04) 285,620,445 $ 1.49 ($444,000,000) Total Nextel Loss (5.01) ($2,059,000,000) Based on the above analysis, Nextel proposed that its credit for 800 MHz spectrum be increased by
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-294A1_Erratum.doc
    • category, and then applied to the MHz-pop figures for each category the MHz-pops formulas that were used in the 800 MHz R&O (i.e., $1.70 per MHz-pop for contiguous and GX spectrum, $1.49 per MHz-pop for interleaved spectrum), yielding the results in the table below: MHz POPs Value MHz POP Actual Value NPSPAC Spectrum 6.00 285,620,445 $ 1.70 $2,913,328,539 Restricted Use (0.5) 285,620,445 $ 1.70 ($242,777,378) Guard Band (2.00) 247,051,622 $ 1.70 ($839,975,515) Nextel Upper Channel Gain 3.50 1,831,000,000 General Category (4.51) 285,620,445 $ 1.70 ($2,188,000,000) SMR Interleaved (2.96) 285,620,445 $ 1.49 ($1,258,000,000) B/ILT Interleaved (1.04) 285,620,445 $ 1.49 ($444,000,000) Total Nextel Loss (5.01) ($2,059,000,000) Based on the above analysis, Nextel proposed that its credit for 800 MHz spectrum be increased by
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-6A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-6A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-6A1.txt
    • applicants' actual proposed facilities in performing its Section 307(b) analysis. See, e.g., Tuck, 3 FCC Rcd at 5376; North Texas Radio, Inc., 11 FCC Rcd 8531, 8535-37 (1996) (Commission uses applicants' proposals in determining whether coverage of adjacent Urbanized Area is sufficient to invoke Huntington doctrine). Finally, the Bureau made clear that it would use applicants' proposed 2 mV/m and 0.5 mV/m contours in making its Section 307(b) determination. See Mutually Exclusive Public Notice, 15 FCC Rcd at 20451; October Section 307(b) Request at 2. Application for Review at 14. File No. BNP-20000201AFB. See Public Notice, ``AM Auction No. 32 Non-Mutually Exclusive Applications - Mass Media Bureau Announces Form 301 Application Deadline and Ten-Day Petition to Deny Period,'' 15 FCC Rcd
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-77A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-77A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-77A1.txt
    • The mean power of emissions shall be attenuated in accordance with the following schedule: (A) In any 4 kHz band, the center frequency of which is removed from the center frequency of the assigned channel by more than 50 percent of the channel bandwidth and is within the bands 18,820-18870 MHz or 19,19160-19,210 MHz: A = 35 + .003(F - 0.5B) dB or, 80 dB (whichever is the lesser attenuation). Where A = Attenuation (in decibels) below output power level contained within the channel for a given polarization. B = Bandwidth of channel in kHz. F = Absolute value of the difference between the center frequency of the 4 kHz band measured at the center frequency of the channel in kHz.
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-12A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-12A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-12A1.txt
    • Subgroups Statistics Basic & Expanded Basic Service Equipment Monthly Cable Rate Basic & Expanded Basic Channels Price Per Channel Sample groups combined Average $41.04 $4.28 $45.32 70.3 $0.660 Observations 641 641 641 641 641 Standard error 0.26 0.12 0.31 0.6 0.007 Noncompetitive group Average $41.29 $4.27 $45.56 70.1 $0.665 Observations 406 406 406 406 406 Standard error 0.21 0.10 0.26 0.5 0.006 Competitive group Average $38.17 $4.31 $42.48 72.5 $0.599 Observations 235 235 235 235 235 Standard error 0.78 0.27 0.88 1.3 0.016 Wireline competition Average $34.56 $4.24 $38.80 74.9 $0.523 Observations 115 115 115 115 115 Standard error 0.79 0.27 0.88 1.2 0.014 Wireline incumbent Average $34.15 $4.52 $38.67 75.3 $0.518 Observations 65 65 65 65 65 Standard error 0.77
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-13A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-13A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-13A1.txt
    • of 2004 were larger than expected and some companies have revised their projections for 2004 from slight increases to no growth in the number of basic subscribers. For example, Comcast added 140,000 basic cable subscribers in 2003. These gains were followed by losses in the first six months of 2004. By year-end 2004, Comcast expects net additions of less than 0.5 percent to the number of basic cable subscribers. For 2003, Cox added 57,000 basic cable subscribers (a 0.9 percent increase). These gains were followed by a loss of 75,000 basic cable subscribers in the first six months of 2004. For the year 2004, Cox expects basic cable subscriber growth to be just under one percent. For 2003, Time Warner reported
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-18A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-18A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-18A1.txt
    • conclude, however, that, except as otherwise discussed herein, we should retain the same method of revising the PCI to reflect inflation and exogenous cost adjustments that presently apply to special access services. Productivity Factor or X-Factor The X-factor adopted in the LEC Price Cap Order consisted of a component based on historical LEC productivity, and an additional productivity obligation of 0.5 percent that represented a consumer productivity dividend (CPD) by which the first LEC productivity gains were assigned to customers in the form of lower rates. Initially, price cap LECs were required to share a portion of their earnings in excess of specified rates of return with their access customers by temporarily reducing the price cap ceiling in a subsequent period.
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-199A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-199A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-199A1.txt
    • to compensate for the multipath. H&E states that a receiver's adaptive equalizer, in attempting to compensate for the multipath will increase the system's noise level at the frequencies of compensation. H&E submits that at a good receiver location with little multipath, the adaptive equalizer tap energy might be about -10 dB, corresponding to a white noise penalty of less than 0.5 dB and that at a poor location the white noise penalty may exceed 2 dB. H&E further states that laboratory tests by others showed that receiver sensitivity decreased on the order of 0-5.3 dB in the presence of multipath. Other commenting parties generally observe that in the early stages of the DTV transition, multipath was found to be much more
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-199A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-199A2.txt
    • 3.5 dB for UHF. This model's list price is only $33.63 (antennacraft-tpd.com).72 Specialty LNAs are also available from manufacturers such as Blonder Tongue and Advanced Receiver Research. Advanced Receiver Research manufactures single channel LNAs with exceptionally low noise figures. For example, single channel low VHF LNAs are available with a gain of 24 dB and a noise figure of only 0.5 dB. Advanced Receiver Research also manufactures a broadband UHF LNA with narrow tune capability with a gain of 15 dB and a noise figure of 0.6 dB.73 Blonder Tongue not only makes single channel LNAs, but it makes broadband LNAs with exceptionally high gain figures. For instance, Blonder Tongue's Vaulter III Plus model provides a gain of 31 dB in
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-199A3.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-199A3.txt
    • relationship between total equalizer tap energy relative to the main tap and white noise enhancement. Over the tap energy range of -20 to 0 dB, the white noise enhancement ranges from 0 to 3 dB. At a "good" receiver location (having little multipath), the tap energy might be about -10 dB, corresponding to a white noise penalty of less than 0.5 dB. However, at a poor location, the white noise penalty may exceed 2 dB. Therefore, field measurements should include collection of white noise enhancement values, or equivalently, tap energy data. Such data can be obtained from professional DTV demodulators, which are available from several sources.24 The resulting white noise enhancement would then be subtracted from the measured field strength. Dynamic
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-199A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-199A5.txt
    • but, more importantly, fit within the "safety margin" that already exists in the current planning factors given real-world reception conditions and equipment. White noise enhancement is the additional noise created in the DTV receiver when the equalizer compensates for multipath ghosts. EchoStar notes that at a "good" receiver location, the white noise enhancement necessary to handle multipath is "less than 0.5 dB," but, "at a poor location, the white noise penalty may exceed 2 dB."33 However, there is no reason to assume that even a majority of the locations are "poor." A more typical value for moderate multipath conditions with moderate ghosts is around 1 dB. Just as the Commission should not assume the need for a time 34 See Hammett
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-29A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-29A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-29A1.txt
    • 16 (specifically that the Commission could specify the events that trigger the exchange of information, but not require the use of specific CARE Transaction Code Status Indicators (TCSIs)). Rural ILECs Comments on IRFA at 4. Rural ILECs Comments on the IRFA at 5 (maintaining that if the ILEC were to generate reports twice a week, the additional burden may be 0.5 to 1 hour, depending on whether the reports were created by hand or by computer, which amounts to 26 to 52 hours per year per ILEC. If applicable to 1,000 ILECs, the total additional burden for all small ILECs could be 26,000 to 52,000 hours per year). Rural ILECs Comments on the IRFA at 5-6 (contending that the ATIS document
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-62A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-62A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-62A1.txt
    • error. Spacenet considers this to be a conservative estimate because VSAT licensees can generally achieve a pointing error within 0.4° because of the steep cross-polarization null in most sub-meter antennas. Spacenet further argues that the Commission has licensed several earth stations that meet the antenna gain pattern envelope starting at 1.8° off-axis. According to SIA, pointing accuracy is routinely within 0.5°. Telesat maintains that measuring the angular installation pointing error is not practical. Telesat contends that a pointing error of 0.5 dB is achievable. Telesat argues that the technical information provided in SIA's comments support starting the Ku-band antenna gain pattern envelope at 1.5° off-axis, but recommends that this should be the starting point for the antenna gain pattern envelope in
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-62A1_Erratum.doc
    • error. Spacenet considers this to be a conservative estimate because VSAT licensees can generally achieve a pointing error within 0.4° because of the steep cross-polarization null in most sub-meter antennas. Spacenet further argues that the Commission has licensed several earth stations that meet the antenna gain pattern envelope starting at 1.8° off-axis. According to SIA, pointing accuracy is routinely within 0.5°. Telesat maintains that measuring the angular installation pointing error is not practical. Telesat contends that a pointing error of 0.5 dB is achievable. Telesat argues that the technical information provided in SIA's comments support starting the Ku-band antenna gain pattern envelope at 1.5° off-axis, but recommends that this should be the starting point for the antenna gain pattern envelope in
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-63A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-63A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-63A1.txt
    • axis in the 14 GHz band are subject to the provisions of §25.220 of this chapter, which may include power reduction requirements. (d) In the 5925-6425 MHz band, an earth station with an equivalent diameter of 4.5 meters or greater may be routinely licensed for transmission of SCPC services if the maximum power densities into the antenna do not exceed +0.5 dBW/4 kHz for analog SCPC carriers with bandwidths up to 200 kHz, and do not exceed -2.7 dBW/4 kHz for narrow and/or wideband digital SCPC carriers. Antennas with an equivalent diameter smaller than 4.5 meters in the 5925-6425 MHz band are subject to the provisions of §25.220 of this chapter, which may include power reduction requirements. (e) Each applicant for
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-63A1_Erratum.doc
    • axis in the 14 GHz band are subject to the provisions of §25.220 of this chapter, which may include power reduction requirements. (d) In the 5925-6425 MHz band, an earth station with an equivalent diameter of 4.5 meters or greater may be routinely licensed for transmission of SCPC services if the maximum power densities into the antenna do not exceed +0.5 dBW/4 kHz for analog SCPC carriers with bandwidths up to 200 kHz, and do not exceed -2.7 dBW/4 kHz for narrow and/or wideband digital SCPC carriers. Antennas with an equivalent diameter smaller than 4.5 meters in the 5925-6425 MHz band are subject to the provisions of §25.220 of this chapter, which may include power reduction requirements. (e) Each applicant for
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-70A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-70A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-70A1.txt
    • from a Federal GSO space station or from a Federal space station in a NGSO constellation of 50 or fewer satellites, for all conditions and for all methods of modulation, shall not exceed the following values in any 1 MHz band: (1) -115 dB(W/m²) for angles of arrival above the horizontal plane (() between 0° and 5°, (2) -115 + 0.5(( - 5) dB(W/m²) for ( between 5° and 25°, and (3) -105 dB(W/m²) for ( between 25° and 90°. (b) In the sub-band 17.8-19.3 GHz, the power flux-density at the surface of the Earth produced by emissions from a Federal space station in an NGSO constellation of 51 or more satellites, for all conditions and for all methods of modulation,
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-74A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-74A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-74A1.txt
    • by which a LEC could increase or must decrease its aggregate rates each year. The basic PCI formula had three components: (1) an inflation element measured by the Gross National Product-Price Index (``GNP-PI''); (2) a productivity offset of 3.3 percent which represented the amount by which the LECs historically have exceeded productivity in the economy as a whole, plus a 0.5 percent ``consumer productivity dividend;'' and (3) exogenous cost adjustments. A GAAP change was not accorded exogenous treatment unless the LEC showed that the change ``will not be double counted in the Price Cap Index, once in the GNP-PI and once as an exogenous cost.'' We find that Verizon has justified exogenous treatment for accrued OPEB costs for the years 1991
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-105A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-105A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-105A1.txt
    • 60.4% 60.4% 0.0% - 0.0% - Houston, TX [REDACTED] [REDACTED] 0.0% - 0.0% - Indianapolis, IN [REDACTED] [REDACTED] 0.0% - 0.0% - Jacksonville, FL 66.4% 84.3% 27.0% $ 7.4 million 21.9% $ 6.4 million Kansas City, KS [REDACTED] [REDACTED] 0.0% - 0.0% - Los Angeles, CA [REDACTED] [REDACTED] [REDACTED] [REDACTED] Memphis, TN 56.4% 55.5% -1.5% $ -0.6 million -1.2% $ -0.5 million Miami, FL 61.5% 69.4% 13.0% $ 9.7 million 10.4% $ 8.4 million Milwaukee, WI 75.2% 75.2% 0.0% - 0.0% - Minneapolis, MN [REDACTED] [REDACTED] [REDACTED] [REDACTED] Nashville, TN 60.2% 60.2% 0.0% - 0.0% - New Orleans, LA 6.8% 6.8% 0.0% - 0.0% - New York, NY 23.0% 23.0% 0.0% - 0.0% - Orlando, FL [REDACTED] [REDACTED] 0.0% - 0.0%
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-120A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-120A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-120A1.txt
    • for Rulemaking to consider the feasibility of reduced DBS spacing. In its petition, DIRECTV proposed the following protection criteria to safeguard existing nine-degree-spaced DBS systems: (1) a 24 dB single-entry carrier-to-interference ratio (C/I) for interference into the existing DBS system, based on the use of a 45-cm subscriber antenna meeting the antenna gain pattern mask of ITU-R Recommendation BO.1213, with 0.5 degree maximum pointing error, and a 1.05 dB ``bandwidth advantage'' factor due to the use of opposite polarizations or a frequency offset; and (2) a 24 dB single-entry C/I level based on the use of 1-meter receive antenna for Alaska and Hawaii. DIRECTV also proposed that the single-entry C/I for interference from existing systems to the new DBS systems spaced
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-141A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-141A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-141A1.txt
    • The mean power of emissions shall be attenuated in accordance with the following schedule: (A) In any 4 kHz band, the center frequency of which is removed from the center frequency of the assigned channel by more than 50 percent of the channel bandwidth and is within the bands 18,820-18870 MHz or 19,19160-19,210 MHz: A = 35 + .003(F - 0.5B) dB or, 80 dB (whichever is the lesser attenuation). Where A = Attenuation (in decibels) below output power level contained within the channel for a given polarization. B = Bandwidth of channel in kHz. F = Absolute value of the difference between the center frequency of the 4 kHz band measured at the center frequency of the channel in kHz.
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-148A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-148A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-148A1.txt
    • at 978 MHz. Section 87.139 is amended by adding paragraph (l) to read as follows: § 87.139 Emission limitations. * * * * * (l)(1) For Universal Access Transceiver transmitters, the average emissions measured in a 100 kHz bandwidth must be attenuated below the maximum emission level contained within the authorized bandwidth by at least: Frequency (MHz) Attenuation (dB) +/- 0.5 0 +/- 1.0 18 +/- 2.25 50 +/- 3.25 60 (2) Universal Access Transceiver transmitters with an output power of 5 Watts or more must limit their emissions by at least 43 + 10 log (P) dB on any frequency removed from the assigned frequency by more than 250% of the authorized bandwidth. Those emissions shall be measured with a
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-150A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-150A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-150A1.txt
    • 1,029,678 people while reducing its operating costs. We also note that our proposal facilitates a successful resolution of the channel election process in a highly congested area of the country. In particular, replacing WEDH's allotted DTV channel *32 with channel *45 eliminates potential interference from channel 33, which WCBS (New York) elected in round two. WCBS was predicted to cause 0.5 percent interference to WEDH (20,311 people) if it remained on channel 32. WCBS agreed to reduce its facilities to comply with the 0.1 percent standard, thus reducing service significantly. As a result of approving WEDH's TCD for channel *45, WCBS would no longer be required to reduce its facilities in this respect. Therefore, we have adjusted the proposed parameters for
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-150A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-150A2.txt
    • 50 546 74799 344415 863202 24520 1018 0.4 28119ALHUNTSVILLE 54 41 400 518 43864 344412 863159 29827 1213 1 591ALHUNTSVILLE 48 49 41 552 344239 863207 22282 936 0.8 710ALLOUISVILLE 43 44 925 262 59887 314304 852603 18777 337 0.1 4143ALMOBILE 10 9 29 381 304117 874754 34970 1203 0 11906ALMOBILE 15 15 510 558 74580 303640 873627 35605 1284 0.5 60827ALMOBILE 21 20 500 436 42051 303518 873316 27240 1215 0 83740ALMOBILE 23 337 574 75124 303645 873843 38025 1283 0 73187ALMOBILE 5 271000 581 74800 304120 874949 45411 1406 0.3 721ALMOBILE 42 41 199 185 303933 875333 16297 912 0.1 13993ALMONTGOMERY 12 12 24.9 507 74369 315828 860944 31615 788 0.5 73642ALMONTGOMERY 20 161000 518 29552 315828 860944 37695
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-155A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-155A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-155A1.txt
    • station of not more than two percent of the population served by another TV/DTV broadcast station, so long as the protected station is not, or will not be, receiving interference in excess of ten percent of its population from all combined interfering stations. In addition, applicants seeking facilities modifications of full-service NTSC (analog TV) stations are permitted to cause a 0.5 percent reduction in service population to DTV service to account for rounding and calculation tolerances. Within the channel allotment process for developing a post-transition DTV allotment table, a DTV station may add interference by as much as 0.1 percent of the population served by another station. These examples demonstrate that the Commission repeatedly has recognized the predictive nature of the
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-173A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-173A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-173A1.txt
    • EMR-300 meters and Type 25 probes (``W&G Meters'') and Narda Model 8718 meters and Model 8722 probes (``Narda Meters''). When conducting the on-off tests and individual station measurements on July 12, 2002, the agents used the W&G Meters exclusively. 19 FCC Rcd at 23931, n.63. The manufacturer-specified uncertainty factors for the W&G Meters and the Narda Meters extend from +/- 0.5 dB to +/- 3 dB, depending on various factors, including, for example, the magnitude of the measurement, the frequency response, the isotropic deviation and the measurement methodology. Telemundo also argues that no sanctions can be justified against KWHY because if a ``measurement yields a 5, plus or minus 2, it is equally valid to argue that the `real' measurement is
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-179A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-179A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-179A1.txt
    • Basic tier 24.9 24.9 24.5 23.8 21.2 30.9 26.0 23.3 24.6 Standard error 0.7 0.7 1.3 1.5 0.9 3.0 1.2 1.0 2.6 Expanded basic tier 45.6 45.4 47.5 50.1 52.0 45.0 44.5 48.0 44.1 Standard error 0.8 0.8 1.5 1.6 1.0 3.1 1.5 1.3 3.4 Basic + expanded 70.5 70.3 72.0 73.9 73.2 75.9 70.5 71.3 68.7 Standard error 0.6 0.5 0.9 0.9 0.7 1.5 0.9 0.9 2.1 Digital tier 33.7 33.6 34.2 35.8 35.1 37.8 35.1 31.6 20.4 Standard error 0.9 0.8 1.6 1.6 1.4 2.1 1.4 2.0 2.9 January 1, 2004 Basic tier 24.5 24.5 24.3 23.7 21.3 30.3 25.6 23.6 23.1 Standard error 0.7 0.7 1.3 1.5 0.9 2.9 1.1 1.1 2.7 Expanded basic tier 44.3 44.0 46.6
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-35A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-35A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-35A1.txt
    • COMMISSION Marlene H. Dortch Secretary APPENDIX Parts 0, 4, 11, 64, and 90 of Title 47 of the Code of Federal Regulations are amended as follows: PART 0 - COMMISSION ORGANIZATION 1. The authority citation for Part 0 continues to read as follows: AUTHORITY: Secs. 5, 48 Stat. 1068, as amended; 47 U.S.C. 155, 225, unless otherwise noted. 2. Section 0.5 is amended by revising paragraph (a) to read as follows: § 0.5 General description of Commission organization and operations. (a) Principal staff units. The Commission is assisted in the performance of its responsibilities by its staff, which is divided into the following principal units: * * * * * Public Safety and Homeland Security Bureau. * * * * *
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-47A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-47A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-47A1.txt
    • most recent bidding round plus one minus the weighting factor times the activity index from the prior round. The activity index is then used to calculate a percentage increment by multiplying a minimum percentage increment by one plus the activity index with that result being subject to a maximum percentage increment. We proposed to initially set the weighting factor at 0.5, the minimum percentage increment at 0.1 (10%), and the maximum percentage increment at 0.2 (20%). Hence, at these initial settings, the percentage increment will fluctuate between 10% and 20% depending upon the number of bids for the license. We will round the result using our standard rounding procedures. In the case of a license for which the provisionally winning bid
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-70A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-70A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-70A1.txt
    • R 980 0 R]/P 966 0 R/S/TD>> endobj 970 0 obj<> endobj 971 0 obj<> endobj 972 0 obj<> endobj 973 0 obj<> endobj 974 0 obj<0.5/BlockAlign/Before/BorderStyle(Solid)>> endobj 975 0 obj<> endobj 976 0 obj<> endobj 977 0 obj<> endobj 978 0 obj<> endobj 979 0 obj<> endobj 980 0 obj<> endobj 981 0 obj<> endobj
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-90A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-90A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-90A1.txt
    • 23.00-23.55 GHz, and 24.45-24.75 GHz frequency bands, the power flux-density at the Earth's surface produced by emissions from a space station for all conditions for all methods of modulation shall not exceed the following values: (1) -115 dB (W/m\2\) in any 1 MHz band for angles of arrival between 0 and 5 degrees above the horizontal plane. (2) -115 + 0.5 (d-5) dB (W/m\2\) in any 1 MHz band for angles of arrival d (in degrees) between 5 and 25 degrees above the horizontal plane. (3) -105 dB (W/m\2\) in any 1 MHz band for angles of arrival between 25 and 90 degrees above the horizontal plane. §25.2xx Technical requirements for space stations operating in the 17/24 GHz broadcasting-satellite service [new
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-90A1_Erratum.doc
    • 23.00-23.55 GHz, and 24.45-24.75 GHz frequency bands, the power flux-density at the Earth's surface produced by emissions from a space station for all conditions for all methods of modulation shall not exceed the following values: (1) -115 dB (W/m\2\) in any 1 MHz band for angles of arrival between 0 and 5 degrees above the horizontal plane. (2) -115 + 0.5 (d-5) dB (W/m\2\) in any 1 MHz band for angles of arrival d (in degrees) between 5 and 25 degrees above the horizontal plane. (3) -105 dB (W/m\2\) in any 1 MHz band for angles of arrival between 25 and 90 degrees above the horizontal plane. §25.2xx Technical requirements for space stations operating in the 17/24 GHz broadcasting-satellite service [new
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-103A1.DOC http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-103A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-103A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-103A1.txt
    • of the spectrum that is currently devoted to analog service ``will facilitate the roll-out of third generation wireless broadband services,'' and that its ``roll-out of wireless broadband services may provide [rural] customers with their only opportunity for broadband access.'' Only 0.50 percent of Verizon Wireless's retail subscribers use analog-only devices, accounting for just 0.1 percent of network MOUs, and only 0.5 percent of Dobson's subscribers use analog-only devices. Similarly, less than one percent of Alltel's subscribers use analog-only devices, accounting for less than one percent of network MOUs (including roaming and resale). In light of such minimal analog network usage and given the ready availability of digital alternatives with more advanced capabilities for wireless consumers, we find that compelling carriers to
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-121A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-121A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-121A1.txt
    • for Review at 7-16 (quoting COMSAT II, 283 F.3d at 349). COMSAT Corporation Request for Reduction of Regulatory Fees for FY 2001, 2000, and 1998, Order, 2006 WL 1881016 (2006). Id. at para. 3. After further considering COMSAT's arguments in light of the Commission's instructions in the remand order, OMD appropriately referred its analysis to the Commission pursuant to section 0.5(c) of the Commission's rules. COMSAT November 16, 2006 Letter. Id. Id. We have consistently rejected arguments that regulatory fees must be precisely calibrated, on a service-by-service basis, to the actual costs of the Commission's regulatory activities for that service, see Assessment and Collection of Regulatory Fees for Fiscal Year 2004, Report and Order, 19 FCC Rcd 11662, 11665-67 paras. 5-11
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-125A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-125A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-125A1.txt
    • PR); WPEZ750 (Santurce, PR); WPFA265 (San Juan, PR); WPFA266 (Santurce, PR); WPFA268 (Santurce, PR); WPFA269 (Santurce, PR); WPFA270 (Santurce, PR); WPFA273 (Santurce, PR); WPFA278 (Santurce, PR); WPFA280 (Santurce, PR); WPFD607 (Santurce, PR); WPFD808 (Santurce, PR); WPFD809 (Santurce, PR); WPFD810 (Santurce, PR); WPFD811 (Santurce, PR); WPFD812 (Santurce, PR); WPFE472 (Santurce, PR); WPFE934 (Cayey, PR); WPFG589 (no ULS address; coordinates 18-16-08.8 N, 066-04-00.5 W); WPFG599 (Caguas, PR); WPFM597 (Cayey, PR); WPFM600 (San Juan, PR); WPFN354 (Aguada, PR); WPFN600 (Anasco, PR); WPFN636 (Anasco, PR); WPFN725 (Anasco, PR); WPFQ293 (Charlotte Amalie, VI); WPFS846 (Saint Croix, VI); WPFS856 (Saint Croix, VI); WPFT334 (Saint Croix, VI); WPFT335 (Saint Croix, VI); WPFT335 (Aguada, PR); WPFT356 (Aguada, PR); WPFT357 (Saint Croix, VI); WPFT369 (Charlotte Amalie, VI); WPFT416 (Charlotte Amalie,
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-126A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-126A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-126A1.txt
    • the Coast Guard filed its Opposition to Second Waiver Request on July 20, 2005. MariTEL represents that counsel for the Coast Guard had indicated that the Coast Guard would not interpose any objection to the late submission of the Reply to Opposition to Second Waiver Request. Id. No other party commented on the Second Waiver Request. See 47 C.F.R. § 0.5(c) (providing in pertinent part that ``the staff is at liberty to refer any matter at any stage to the Commission for action, upon concluding that it involves matters warranting the Commission's consideration ...''). Given our determination to consolidate and address jointly the AFR and the Second Waiver Request, we need not address the Coast Guard's argument that the Commission should
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-137A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-137A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-137A1.txt
    • more refined analysis to determine the true impact of the rulemaking proposal. Sherjan further argued that the Commission should also consider population figures based on census data for 2000, rather than the 1999 data used by the staff. Thus, Sherjan submitted analysis of 14 different cell sizes using 2000 population figures to assert that interference to WJAN-CA is less than 0.5 percent in only two out of 14 cases (at 1 km and 1.8 km) and exceeds that figure in every other case. It argued that the staff acted arbitrarily and capriciously by allowing the Proponents to rely on a non-standard cell size and then select a convenient cell size to yield the desired result. 7. In dismissing the Petition for
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-138A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-138A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-138A1.txt
    • stations if new interference exceeded 0.1 percent. The 2.0 percent standard, in contrast, was appropriate in the context of pre-transition digital operations. In developing the initial DTV Table, the Commission used the 2.0 percent standard to fit DTV stations in the DTV Table while analog stations were also in operation. We further note that we have proposed a different standard, 0.5 percent, for DTV-to-DTV interference post transition. This 0.5 percent standard, if adopted in the Third DTV Periodic Report and Order, would be used to evaluate proposals starting after the establishment of the final post-transition DTV Table. AMTS Licensees' Protection of TV Channels 10 and 13 In response to comments filed by Maritime Communications/Land Mobile, LLC (``MC/LM''), we conclude that an
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-138A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-138A2.txt
    • 15 510 558 74580 303640 873627 35481 1282 0.6 60827ALMOBILE 21 20 105 529 70813 303640 873627 23682 1116 0 83740ALMOBILE 23 337 574 75124 303645 873843 37989 1283 0.1 73187ALMOBILE 5 271000 581 74800 304120 874949 45411 1406 0.3 721ALMOBILE 42 41 199 185 303933 875333 16361 912 0 13993ALMONTGOMERY 12 12 24.9 507 74369 315828 860944 31615 788 0.5 73642ALMONTGOMERY 20 161000 518 29552 315828 860944 37703 829 1.3 706ALMONTGOMERY 26 27 568 176 322255 861733 18025 549 3.7 72307ALMONTGOMERY 32 32 199 545 75049 320830 864443 28378 579 0.7 60829ALMONTGOMERY 45 46 500 308 28430 322413 861147 21909 641 0.3 711ALMOUNT CHEAHA 7 7 24.1 610 80203 332907 854833 42633 2370 3.4 11113ALOPELIKA 66 47 136 539 74487
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-144A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-144A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-144A1.txt
    • argue that the NAB proposal should be liberalized slightly to allow 15-20% of the FM translator's primary service contour to fall outside the AM station's 2 mV/m daytime contour. Eastern Sierra Broadcasting supports the NAB's proposal, but argues that it should be liberalized in two respects: (a) the FM translator's primary service area contour should extend to the AM station's 0.5 mV/m daytime contour if it does not extend past the AM station's designated market area; and (b) for FM translators in FM Zone II, the mileage limitation should be 35 miles rather than 25 miles, because stations in FM Zone II operate in larger radio markets. Expansion of Purpose and Permissible Service of FM Translators Based on the comments received
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-174A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-174A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-174A1.txt
    • spots. EchoStar requests the flexibility to offset future 17/24 GHz BSS space stations at up to 1 degree while still retaining the ability to transmit at full power and to receive full interference protection. DIRECTV and SES Americom both argue that EchoStar's concerns could be addressed by an offset of less than 1 degree and typically of between 0.3 to 0.5 degrees. DIRECTV argues further that such offsets would require the offset operator to make only small reductions in power and would have minimal impact on operations. Assuming DIRECTV's assertion that small offsets would only require small reductions in power is correct, we find that any reduction in power to protect a later authorized Appendix F licensee would unfairly penalize applicants
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-186A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-186A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-186A1.txt
    • (or ``X'') Factor, and Exogenous Costs. The basic formula takes a base rate and multiplies it a factor that reflects an increase due to inflation, offset by a decrease due to efficiencies. The Inflation Factor will be the Gross Domestic Product - Price Index (GDP-PI)). The Efficiency Factor will be set as a figure equal to the Inflation Factor, less 0.5 percent (or 0.005) to account for productivity gains. As a result the rate for a particular year will equal the rate for the previous year, reduced by 0.5 percent (i.e., RateYear Y = RateYear Y-1 (1 - 0.005)). Reducing the rate by this amount will encourage IP Relay providers to become more efficient in providing the service. We will also
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-206A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-206A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-206A1.txt
    • between 35 and 73 percent of total basic cable subscribers. Table 9: Digital Cable Subscribers for Top MSOs (in millions) Operator 2005 Jan.-June 2006 Digital Subscribers Percent of Basic Cable Subs Digital Subscribers Percent of Basic Cable Subs Comcast 9.8 46% 10.5 49% Time Warner 5.4 49% 5.8 53% Cablevision 2.0 65% 2.3 73% Charter 2.8 48% 2.9 49% Mediacom 0.5 35% 0.5 35% NCTA reports that, as of the end of June 2006, cable operators were carrying the digital broadcast signals of 788 broadcast television stations. NCTA also states that an agreement between cable operators and public television stations ensures that local public television digital programming is being carried on cable systems throughout the country. High-Definition Television (``HDTV''). HDTV features
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-225A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-225A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-225A1.txt
    • to our decision in Qualcomm as it is instructive to our instant analysis. After conducting our own review of the Engineering Study, we note that the affected population percentages predicted by New York are within the de minimis standards and exceptions established in Qualcomm. Due to the incremental increase of allowable interference in Qualcomm, the de minimis allowance changed from 0.5 percent to 1.0 percent effective October 13, 2007. Therefore, the percentages of TV station service populations predicted to receive interference, with a maximum of 0.96 percent, are now within the current 1.0 percent de minimis allowance. Based on our observations, we therefore disagree with WFUT-TV's contention that the de minimis threshold is inapplicable to the Waiver Request. Qualcomm observes in
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-228A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-228A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-228A1.txt
    • use their pre-transition DTV channel for post-transition operation. This policy will allow added flexibility for stations that wish to use their existing analog channel antenna, which provides benefits for the successful completion of the transition by reducing the demands on equipment suppliers and installation crews during a critical time as the transition date nears. [Section V.E., infra.] We adopt a 0.5 percent new interference standard (i.e., only considering interference in addition to that contained in the post-transition DTV Table Appendix B) to apply to applications for post-transition facilities and also to future maximization applications and applications to implement new allotments. [Section V.F., infra and Rule 47 C.F.R. § 73.616 in Appendix B.] We update the Commission's rules to reflect the latest
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-34A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-34A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-34A1.txt
    • because all of WildBlue-1 and some portion of Spaceway will be dedicated to that market. Table 14 provides a comparison of the current satellite-based market participants' offerings, indicating the similarity of each company's service offerings and prices charged, particularly for services targeted at residential/home office customers. TABLE 14 SERVICE OFFERINGS AND PRICES CHARGED BY SATELLITE-BASED BROADBAND PROVIDERS WildBlue Downstream speed 0.5 Mbps 1.0 Mbps 1.5 Mbps Upstream speed 128 Kbps 200 Kbps 256 Kbps Upfront cost $ 299 $ 299 $ 299 Monthly price $ 49.95 $ 69.95 $ 79.95 Hughes Downstream speed 0.5-0.7 Mbps 0.8 -1.0 Mbps 1.5 Mbps Upstream speed N/A N/A N/A Upfront cost $ 299.98 $ 299.98 $ 699.98 Monthly price $ 59.00 $ 69.00 $ 199.00
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-70A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-70A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-70A1.txt
    • revise FCC Forms 301 and 340 accordingly. [Section V.D. and Appendix B] We tentatively conclude that we will not accept applications to expand post-transition facilities until we have completed processing the applications to build authorized facilities, but we seek comment on ways to consider expansion applications sooner without delaying the transition. [Section V.E.] We tentatively conclude to adopt a new 0.5 percent interference standard to apply to maximizations and to new channel allotments after the transition. [Section V.F. and proposed rule 47 C.F.R. § 73.616 in Appendix A] We propose to update the Commission's rules to reflect any revisions to the ATSC standards concerning DTV transmission and PSIP since the adoption of the Second DTV Periodic Report and Order. [Sections V.G.1.
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-72A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-72A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-72A1.txt
    • BOP, a proposal filed by a consortium including most of the existing Guard Band Managers. According to the BOP, the existing A Block would be eliminated and the existing A Block licensees would be relocated to a modified B Block that the BOP proponents have renamed the new A Block. Of the current 2 megahertz paired of B Block spectrum, 0.5 megahertz paired would be added to the adjacent public safety allocation. The remaining 1.5 megahertz paired would be designated the new A Block, and the 1 megahertz paired of current A Block spectrum would be added to the public safety allocation. These changes would increase the total allocation of public safety spectrum in the 700 MHz Band from 24 to
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-72A1_Erratum.doc
    • BOP, a proposal filed by a consortium including most of the existing Guard Band Managers. According to the BOP, the existing A Block would be eliminated and the existing A Block licensees would be relocated to a modified B Block that the BOP proponents have renamed the new A Block. Of the current 2 megahertz paired of B Block spectrum, 0.5 megahertz paired would be added to the adjacent public safety allocation. The remaining 1.5 megahertz paired would be designated the new A Block, and the 1 megahertz paired of current A Block spectrum would be added to the public safety allocation. These changes would increase the total allocation of public safety spectrum in the 700 MHz Band from 24 to
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-85A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-85A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-85A1.txt
    • is amended by revising paragraphs (a)(2)(i), (a)(2)(ii), (a)(3), (a)(4), (a)(6), and (a)(7) to read as follows: § 90.242 Travelers' information stations. (a) * * * * * (2) * * * * * (i) A statement certifying that the transmitting site of the Travelers' Information Station will be located at least 15 km (9.3 miles) measured orthogonally outside the measured 0.5 mV/m daytime contour (0.1 mV/m for Class A stations) of any AM broadcast station operating on a first adjacent channel or at least 130 km (80.6 miles) outside the measured 0.5 mV/m daytime contour (0.1 mV/m for Class A stations) of any AM broadcast station operating on the same channel, or, if nighttime operation is proposed, outside the theoretical 0.5
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-86A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-86A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-86A1.txt
    • that General Dynamics states that the VMES antenna pointing system that it has developed has been tested to meet Commission service rules while the vehicle travels over a selected road-course, specifically, the Churchville B course at the U.S. Army Aberdeen Proving Grounds. General Dynamics states that the antenna transmit-control system mutes the transmitter when the antenna mispoints by more than 0.5 degrees in the GSO orbital plane, thereby preventing interference to neighboring FSS satellites. Whatever the design specifications of a VMES antenna tracking mechanism, the possibility exists that prevailing off-road conditions will cause design specifications to be exceeded. This situation does not exist for Ku-band ESV systems except under unusual circumstances. We ask if it is reasonable to structure service rules
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-114A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-114A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-114A1.txt
    • 13 FCC Rcd at 15965. In both the Mutually Exclusive Public Notice and the Letter to Sharon Berlin Ingles, Powell Meredith Communications Company, and TELNS Broadcasting Company, Inc., Letter, Ref. No. 1800B3-TSN (MMB Oct. 22, 2001) (``October Section 307(b) Request''), the Bureau requested the following information from all applicants: ``(1) the area and population within the proposed 2 mV/m and 0.5 mV/m contours; (2) the number of stations licensed to the proposed community of license; (3) the number of stations providing protected service to the proposed community of license; (4) the population (according to the latest Census data) of the proposed community of license; (5) a description of the civic, cultural, religious, social and commercial attributes of the proposed community of
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-136A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-136A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-136A1.txt
    • developed than Winchester, and thus has a greater need for an additional aural broadcast service. 5. We deny the Application for Review. We uphold the Bureau's finding that the Johnson application is entitled to a dispositive Section 307(b) preference because the Johnson proposal will serve a substantially larger number of persons. Specifically, Johnson proposes to serve 1,340,944 persons within his 0.5 mV/m contour and 1,327,925 persons within his 2 mV/m contour, while the Bate proposal would yield 0.5 mV/m service to 99,701 persons and 2 mV/m service to 83,461 persons. 6. The Bureau correctly considered the respective needs of St. George and the Las Vegas Urbanized Area for additional service. Both communities receive abundant service. Because of this, Bate's contention regarding
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-137A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-137A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-137A1.txt
    • for Review, finding the Bureau did not err in concluding the Eustis application is entitled to a dispositive Section 307(b) preference. We uphold the Reconsideration Decision based upon the fact that the Eustis proposal will serve a substantially larger number of persons. Specifically, the Eustis proposal will serve 59,557 persons within the 2 mV/m contour and 211,443 persons within the 0.5 mV/m contour. In comparison, the Bate proposal will serve 9,394 persons within the 2 mV/m contour and 55,001 persons within the 0.5 mV/m contour. The difference in the respective nighttime interference-free contours also is decisionally significant. The Eustis proposal for Johnstown will serve 4,895 within the 14.4 mV/m contour while the Bate proposal would serve 2,734 persons within the 9.2
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-18A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-18A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-18A1.txt
    • Government Accountability Office. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Marlene H. Dortch Secretary Shiner, Texas, Report and Order, 19 FCC Rcd 4327 (MB 2004). Tilden, Texas, Report and Order, 19 FCC Rcd 6112 (MB 2004). Batesville, Texas, Notice of Proposed Rule Making, 16 FCC Rcd 12682 (MB 2001). The Media Bureau has referred this matter to the Commission pursuant to 47 C.F.R. § 0.5(c). Quanah, Texas, Notice of Proposed Rule Making, 15 FCC Rcd 15809 (MMB 2000). Section 1.420(d) of the Rules requires a counterproposal to be filed by the specified comment date in a rulemaking proceeding. 47 C.F.R. § 1.420(d). These Petitions for Rule Making were filed between April 18 and May 23, 2001. Benjamin and Mason, Texas, Memorandum Opinion and Order, 18
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-216A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-216A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-216A1.txt
    • Letter, Ref. No. 1800B3-TSN (MMB October 22, 2001) (``October Section 307(b) Request''). The October Section 307(b) Request bore OMB Control No. 3060-0996. October Section 307(b) Request at 2-3. Terry F. Berman, Esq., and Dennis J. Kelly, Esq., Letter, Ref. No. 1800B3-JR (MMB Mar. 28, 2002). Pamplin proposed to serve 207,514 persons within its 2 mV/m contour and 364,294 within its 0.5 mV/m contour. Kidd's proposal would have served 27,471 persons within the 2 mV/m contour and 317,281 in its 0.5 mV/m contour. Additionally, Pamplin proposed nighttime interference-free service to 77,975 persons, compared with such service to 9,416 under Kidd's proposal. Petition for Reconsideration at 3-4. See Family Broadcasting Group, Decision, 93 FCC2d 771, 779 (Rev. Bd. 1983), review denied, FCC 83-559
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-228A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-228A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-228A1.txt
    • and the transmission line connecting the sampling elements to the antenna monitor must provide accurate and stable signals to the monitor (e.g., rigidly mounted and non-rotatable loops and all system components protected from physical and environmental disturbances). (2) Sampling lines for directional antennas may be of different lengths provided the phase difference of signals at the monitor are less than 0.5 degrees between the shortest and longest cable lengths due to temperature variations to which the system is exposed. (3) Other configurations of sampling systems may be used upon demonstration of stable operation to the FCC. (b) An AM station permittee authorized to construct a directional antenna system which will be subject to a proof of performance based on moment method
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-236A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-236A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-236A1.txt
    • Letter). AT&T/BellSouth Merger Order, 22 FCC Rcd at 5773, para. 230. Lovern Petition at 1. AT&T filed an opposition to this petition on February 5, 2007, and filed a corrected copy of its opposition on February 6, 2007. Mr. Lovern filed a reply on February 12, 2007. Id. at 4-5. Id. at 5-6. Id. at 6. See 47 C.F.R. § 0.5(d); see also 47 C.F.R. § 0.5(a)-(c) (pointing out that the Commission has delegated authority to address certain types of matters to various organizational units within the agency). Therefore, the effective date of that order is determined pursuant to section 1.103(a) of our rules, rather than section 1.102 of our rules as Mr. Lovern asserts. Compare 47 C.F.R. § 1.103(a) (setting
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-246A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-246A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-246A1.txt
    • the Commission's proposed off-axis EIRP envelopes for C-band earth station antennas greater than or equal to 2.4 meters in diameter, and for Ku-band earth station antennas greater than or equal to 0.7 meters in diameter. SIA, however, asserts that the Commission's proposal to start the off-axis EIRP envelope at 1.5° does not adequately protect against mispointing of an antenna by 0.5° or less, as the Commission found in the Sixth Report and Order. SIA further recommends that, for C-band earth station antennas less than 2.4 meters in diameter, and for Ku-band earth station antennas less than 0.7 meters in diameter, the Commission adopt off-axis EIRP envelopes that limit off-axis EIRP in the sidelobes greater than 6° slightly more than as proposed
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-250A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-250A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-250A1.txt
    • Requested, to Christian Voice of Central Ohio, Inc., c/o David J. Kaufman, Esq., Rini Coran, PC, 1615 L Street, N.W., Suite 1325, Washington, DC 20036. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Marlene H. Dortch Secretary See Christian Voice of Central Ohio, Petition for Reconsideration (filed June 9, 2008) (``Petition''). The Enforcement Bureau has referred this matter to the full Commission pursuant to Section 0.5(c) of the Rules. See 47 C.F.R. § 0.5(c). See also 47 C.F.R. § 1.106(a)(1). In April 2004, after the complaint initiating this matter had been filed, but before the Enforcement Bureau had inquired into the matter, Christian Voice sought to modify the Station's noncommercial educational license so that it could operate WCVZ(FM) as a commercial facility. See File No. BMLH-20040415AEI,
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-256A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-256A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-256A1.txt
    • our decision to apply Part 73 to DTS stations, we will evaluate DTS proposals using the same interference standard adopted for DTV stations' post-transition operations in the Third DTV Periodic Report and Order. As already noted, commenters generally support application of the Part 73 rules to DTS broadcasters. Interference from DTS Stations. A DTS station must not cause more than 0.5 percent new interference to another station in accordance with Section 73.616 of the rules. We will calculate interference from DTS stations based on the combined signals of all the DTS transmitters in a network. In the DTS Notice, the Commission asked whether to calculate interference based on each DTS transmitter individually or, based more conservatively, on the combined signals of
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-267A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-267A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-267A1.txt
    • defined by the DTV Table Appendix B) beyond its current February 17, 2009 construction deadline. WAKA-TV has demonstrated that the station faces a ``unique technical challenge'' and that it will serve at least 94 percent of the same population that receives its current analog TV and DTV service. Furthermore, the STA facility will not cause impermissible interference, i.e., more than 0.5 percent new interference, to other stations or prevent other stations from making their transition. Therefore, the public interest will also be served by grant of this STA request. Wherefore, the deadline by which WAKA-DT must complete construction of its full, authorized post-transition facilities is extended until March 19, 2009, the date the station represents that it will complete construction. Accordingly,
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-281A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-281A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-281A1.txt
    • to that reflected in the DTV Table Appendix B. This stringent interference standard, which was used in the channel election process, will minimize as much as possible the chance of harmful interference from analog nightlight service to DTV service. We seek comment on this standard. We also propose to permit a station to cause up to, but no more than, 0.5 percent new interference to a digital station in addition to the interference included in DTV Table Appendix B in areas where there is no station listed as eligible in Appendix A or that would meet the 0.1 percent interference standard. We believe that this more-relaxed 0.5 percent interference standard is warranted where necessary to ensure that at least one station
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-28A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-28A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-28A1.txt
    • Eleventh Report, we estimated that digital subscribers made up more than 98 percent of all wireless subscribers at end of 2005. In filings made with the Commission in conjunction with the analog sunset, certain mobile telephone operators with cellular licenses have reported the percentage of their subscriber bases that are analog-only. For instance, both Verizon Wireless and AT&T reported that 0.5 percent of their respective customer bases were analog-only at the end of 2006, while Alltel reported that .96 percent of its customers were analog as of January 31, 2007. Mobile Data The percentage of U.S. mobile telephone subscribers that uses mobile data services continued to rise in the past year. Morgan Stanley estimates that mobile subscribers who use data services
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-72A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-72A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-72A1.txt
    • their analog antenna when they return to their analog channel. The 5-mile waiver policy we adopted in the Third DTV Periodic Report and Order, in addition to the relief we grant herein, should provide significant relief to stations in this situation. In addition, with respect to evaluating interference in applications to construct post-transition facilities, we permitted stations a limit of 0.5 percent new interference in addition to that in the DTV Table Appendix B. This approach provides more flexibility than the interference standard proposed in the Third DTV Periodic Review NPRM, which would have permitted a total of 0.5 percent interference post-transition, rather than 0.5 percent interference in addition to existing interference reflected in DTV Table Appendix B. This added flexibility
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-72A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-72A2.txt
    • 32626 1301 0.9 28119AL HUNTSVILLE 54 41 400 518 43864 344412 863159 29827 1213 1 591AL HUNTSVILLE 48 49 41 552 344239 863207 22282 936 0.8 710AL LOUISVILLE 43 44 925 262 59887 314304 852603 18777 337 0.1 4143AL MOBILE 10 9 29 381 304117 874754 34970 1203 0 11906AL MOBILE 15 15 510 558 74580 303640 873627 35589 1283 0.5 60827AL MOBILE 21 20 105 529 70813 303640 873627 23682 1116 0 83740AL MOBILE 23 337 574 75124 303645 873843 38025 1283 0 73187AL MOBILE 5 271000 581 74800 304120 874949 45375 1406 0.3 721AL MOBILE 42 41 199 185 303933 875333 16357 912 0.1 13993AL MONTGOMERY 12 12 24.9 507 74369 315828 860944 31615 788 0.5 73642AL MONTGOMERY 20
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-99A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-99A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-99A1.txt
    • both a common vibration cadence and a common audio attention signal on any device offered to the public for reception of commercial mobile alerts. Specifically, as the CMSAAC recommended, we specify a temporal pattern for the audio attention signal of one long tone of two (2) seconds, followed by two short tones of one (1) second each, with a half (0.5) second interval between the tones. We will also require that the entire sequence be repeated twice with a half (0.5) second interval between repetitions. For devices with polyphonic capabilities, we adopt the CMSAAC's recommendation that the audio attention signal consist of the two EAS tones (853 Hz and 960 Hz). For devices with a monophonic capability, we will require that
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-09-29A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-09-29A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-09-29A1.txt
    • nine one-megahertz channels and nine five-megahertz channels. Accordingly, there is a discrepancy between the Commission's decision and the rule concerning the number of channels designated for each bandwidth. Channel number 14 is designated as a five-megahertz bandwidth channel in the rules. However, the band edges of its upper neighbors, channel numbers 15 and 16 (each one megahertz wide) are only 0.5 and 1.5 megahertz away, respectively, and the band edge of its lower neighbor, channel number 13 (five megahertz wide) is only 0.5 megahertz away. Therefore, the five megahertz bandwidth of channel number 14 overlaps the bandwidth of channel numbers 13, 15 and 16. Since none of the other channels in the 4.9 GHz band have overlapping bandwidth, we tentatively conclude
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-09-2A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-09-2A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-09-2A1.txt
    • more than 0.1 percent new interference to a digital station in addition to that reflected in the DTV Table Appendix B. We also proposed that, in areas where there is no station listed as eligible in Appendix A or that would meet the 0.1 percent interference standard, we will permit a station to cause up to, but no more than, 0.5 percent new interference to a digital station in addition to the interference included in DTV Table Appendix B. Because we have adopted a more-expansive list of pre-approved nightlight eligible stations herein, we find that it is appropriate to also be more flexible with respect to stations that are not listed in Appendix A but that wish to provide nightlight service.
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-09-59A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-09-59A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-09-59A1.txt
    • introduce new market area to an AM station, but will ``merely account for those AM stations which are directional during daytime hours with patterns that may not even allow the translator to be co-located at the AM transmitter site.'' Similarly, several commenters propose that the Commission should permit the carriage of AM signals on FM translators within the AM station's 0.5 mV/m contour, asserting that this would more accurately reflect the protected service contour of AM stations. Some commenters suggest that the Commission should amend the Rules to allow AM broadcasters using FM translators to operate above the current 250 watt limit set forth in Section 74.1235 of the Rules, arguing that such a revision would allow AM broadcasters to effectively
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-09-63A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-09-63A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-09-63A1.txt
    • significantly increases because exceeding the declared antenna pointing error could result in the ESV operator violating the off-axis e.i.r.p. spectral-density envelope. Accordingly, ESVs must cease transmissions if they exceed the declared antenna pointing error. Because ESVs following the existing off-axis e.i.r.p. spectral-density envelope and pointing rules are required to cease emissions within 100 milliseconds when the antenna pointing error exceeds 0.5 degrees, we will require the low power-density transmitter also to cease emissions within 100 milliseconds if they exceed the declared antenna pointing error. Alternative Antenna Pointing Approach Finally, as mentioned above, Intelsat proposes a variation of the antenna pointing error requirement in which the antenna would be allowed to point more than 0.2 degrees away from the target satellite if
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-09-63A1_Rcd.pdf
    • significantly increases because exceeding the declared antenna pointing error could result in the ESV operator violating the off-axis e.i.r.p. spectral-density envelope. Accordingly, ESVs must cease transmissions if they exceed the declared antenna pointing error. Because ESVs following the existing off-axis e.i.r.p. spectral-density envelope and pointing rules are required to cease emissions within 100 milliseconds when the antenna pointing error exceeds 0.5 degrees, we will require the low power-density transmitter also to cease emissions within 100 milliseconds if they exceed the declared antenna pointing error. c. Alternative Antenna Pointing Approach 27. Finally, as mentioned above, Intelsat proposes a variation of the antenna pointing error requirement in which the antenna would be allowed to point more than 0.2 degrees away from the target
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-09-64A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-09-64A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-09-64A1.txt
    • degrees between the orbital location of the target satellite and the axis of the main lobe of the ESV antenna. Section 25.222(a)(7) required the ESV operator to automatically cease all emissions from the ESV within 100 milliseconds if the angle between the orbital location of the target satellite and the axis of the main lobe of the ESV antenna exceeded 0.5 degrees and not to resume transmission until the angle decreased to less than 0.2 degrees. The NPRM also sought comment on a proposal by Americom to adopt, for VMES, an exception to section 25.222(a)(6) that would be based on two conditions. The first condition Americom proposed would require the VMES applicant to demonstrate that its proposed system complied with the
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-106A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-106A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-106A1.txt
    • output must not exceed the following value under any conditions: Channel (MHz) Transmitter power (carrier power) Watts 27.255 25 26.995-27.195 4 72-76 0.75 (d) CB. Your CB station transmitter power output must not exceed the following values under any conditions: AM (A3)--4 watts (carrier power) SSB--12 watts (peak envelope power). (e) FRS. Regardless of modulation, the power shall not exceed 0.5 watts ERP. (f) LPRS. The maximum allowable ERP for a station in the LPRS other than an AMTS station is 100 mW. The maximum allowable ERP for an AMTS station in the LPRS is 1 W, so long as emissions are attenuated, in accordance with section 80.211 of this chapter, at the band edges. (g) WMTS. The maximum field strength
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-106A1_Rcd.pdf
    • transmitter power output must not exceed the following value under any conditions: Channel (MHz) Transmitter power (carrier power) Watts 27.255 25 26.995-27.195 4 72-76 0.75 (d) CB.Your CB station transmitter power output must not exceed the following values under any conditions:AM (A3)--4 watts (carrier power) SSB--12 watts (peak envelope power). (e) FRS. Regardless of modulation, the power shall not exceed 0.5 watts ERP. (f) LPRS. The maximum allowable ERP for a station in the LPRS other than an AMTS station is 100mW. The maximum allowable ERP for an AMTS station in the LPRS is 1 W, so long as emissions are attenuated, in accordance with section 80.211 of this chapter, at the band edges. (g) WMTS.The maximum field strength authorized for
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-115A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-115A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-115A1.txt
    • been done in the previous cycle based on the 2007 TRS Rate Methodology Order, this rate will be adjusted annually by an inflation factor and an efficiency factor, and will include any appropriate exogenous costs submitted by providers. The inflation factor is the Gross Domestic Product minus the Price Index (GDP-PI), and the efficiency factor is the inflation factor minus 0.5 percent to account for productivity gains. The Carrier Contribution Factor and Funding Requirement Because we adopt NECA's proposed compensation rates for the various forms of TRS, with the adjustment of VRS rates to prevent a steep and disruptive decrease in per-minute compensation, and because we agree that NECA's projected minutes of use for each service are supported by the record
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-129A7.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-129A7.txt
    • 1.1 1.5 2.5 0.8 2.8 4.1 13.9 53.0 22.6 0.3 97.5 100.0 FTTP 0.2 0.0 0.2 0.7 1.4 2.7 24.2 1.3 68.4 1.2 99.8 100.0 Satellite 53.2 35.0 88.3 * * * * 0.0 0.0 0.0 11.7 100.0 Fixed Wireless 14.2 4.5 18.7 20.8 22.3 25.2 9.2 1.9 1.8 0.2 81.3 100.0 Mobile Wireless 30.2 11.9 42.1 17.1 33.3 7.0 0.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 57.9 100.0 Power Line and Other 0.0 0.0 0.0 * * * * 0.0 * 0.0 100.0 100.0 Total 9.6 6.3 15.9 6.9 15.5 13.2 14.8 22.3 11.3 0.2 84.1 100.0 # = Rounds to Zero. * = Data withheld to maintain firm confidentiality. Note: Figures may not sum to totals due to rounding. Source: FCC Form
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-146A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-146A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-146A1.txt
    • of license. (ii) Prior to December 8, 2000, notwithstanding any contrary provisions in this part, the frequency pairs 12.220/12.460 GHz, 12.260/12.500 GHz, 12.300/12.540 GHz and 12.340/12.580 GHz, were authorized for low power, limited coverage systems subject to the following provisions: (A) Maximum equivalent isotropically radiated power (EIRP) shall be 55 dBm; (B) The rated transmitter output power shall not exceed 0.5 watts; (C) Frequency tolerance shall be maintained to within 0.01 percent of the assigned frequency; (D) Maximum beamwidth shall not exceed 4°. However, the sidelobe suppression criteria contained in § 101.115 shall not apply, except that a minimum front-to-back ratio of 38 dB shall apply; (E) Upon showing of need, a maximum bandwidth of 12 MHz may be authorized per
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-172A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-172A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-172A1.txt
    • of operation must be attenuated no less than the following amounts below the average transmitted power within the authorized channel. In the first 500 kHz from the channel edge the emissions must be attenuated no less than 47 dB. More than 6 MHz from the channel edge, emissions must be attenuated no less than 110 dB. At any frequency between 0.5 and 6 MHz from the channel edge, emissions must be attenuated no less than the value determined by the following formula: Attenuation in dB = -11.5([Delta]f + 3.6); Where: [Delta] f = frequency difference in MHz from the edge of the channel. This attenuation is based on a measurement bandwidth of 500 kHz. Other measurement bandwidths may be used as
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-186A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-186A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-186A1.txt
    • continental United States where FS is presumed to operate. For instance, one satellite beam could be pointed halfway between Chicago and St. Louis. Satellites could then raise their PFD much higher and more often if all FS stations were in the higher roll-off zones. Typically, the satellite coverage contour in this frequency band from an antenna with a beamwidth of 0.5 degree will have its maximum gain over an ellipsoid on the surface of the earth with a long axis of the ellipse of about 200 miles (320 kilometers). Inside this ellipse will be the optimum area for earth stations to be located and operate. Outside of this ``maximum gain'' contour, the antenna gain decreases (rolls off) and makes it more
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-186A1_Rcd.pdf
    • continental United States where FS is presumed to operate. For instance, one satellite beam could be pointed halfway between Chicago and St. Louis. Satellites could then raise their PFD much higher and more often if all FS stations were in the higher roll-off zones. Typically, the satellite coverage contour in this frequency band from an antenna with a beamwidth of 0.5 degree will have its maximum gain over an ellipsoid on the surface of the earth with a long axis of the ellipse of about 200 miles (320 kilometers). Inside this ellipse will be the optimum area for earth stations to be located and operate. Outside of this "maximum gain" contour, the antenna gain decreases (rolls off) and makes it more
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-21A1_Rcd.pdf
    • provisions of either § 25.218 or §25.220 of this chapter. (d) * * * (2) For earth stations licensed after March 10, 2005 in the 5925-6425 MHz band, an earth station with an equivalent diameter of 4.5 meters or greater may be routinely licensed for transmission of SCPC services if the maximum power densities into the antenna do not exceed +0.5 dBW/4 kHz for analog SCPC carriers with bandwidths up to 200 kHz, and do not exceed -2.7 - 10log(N) dBW/4 kHz for digital SCPC carriers. For digital SCPC using a frequency division multiple access (FDMA) or time division multiple access (TDMA) technique, N is equal to one. For digital SCPCusing a code division multiple access (CDMA) technique, N is the
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-56A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-56A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-56A1.txt
    • had phone service. Fourteen years later, the Commission's most recent report on telephone subscribership, released in February 2010, found that the telephone subscribership penetration rate in the United States in 2009 had increased to 95.7 percent - the highest reported penetration rate since the Census Bureau began collecting such data in November 1983. This represents a statistically significant increase of 0.5 percent from the 95.2 percent penetration rate reported for 2008. An alternative measure of telephone penetration shows that the telephone penetration rate has risen from 96.9 percent in 2001 to 98.2 percent in 2008. Thus, even as consumers have dropped traditional wireline telephone service, overall subscribership to telephone service continues to increase. Furthermore, average consumer expenditures on telephone service as
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-58A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-58A1.txt
    • See Exhibit 3-M. Exhibit 3-J: Distribution of Users by Actual Maximum Download Speeds (Mbps)18 25% 20 15 10 5 0256K500K768K1M2M3M4M5M6M7M8M9M10M10M+ 2 5 8 5 18 15 7 9 7 5 4 4 3 9 44 FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION | WWW.BROADBAND.GOV OBI TECHNICAL PAPER NO. 1 Exhibit 3-K: Actual Download Speeds Necessary to Run Concurrent Applications (Mbps) 8 6 4 2 0.5 1.0 4.0 7.0 0 E-mail Browsing Streamed SD classroom lecture 2-way video tele-conference Browsing E-mail YouTube video Browsing E-mail Utility Emerging multimedia Full media + Latency Advanced + Upload, Latency, Jitter, etc. Browsing E-mail Exhibit 3-L: Typical (Median) "Up To" Advertised Download Speeds of Most Commonly Deployed and Chosen Consumer Household Broadband (Mbps) 8 6 4 2 N/A 7.0 Mbps
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-81A1_Rcd.pdf
    • unlimited plans.505 Verizon Wireless and AT&T have not adopted this approach, requiring unlimited plan customers to take individual plans.506 Chart 16 Family Plan Subscribers and Penetration of Postpaid Base507 0% 2% 12% 35% 43% 51% 63% 65% 67% 0 50000 100000 150000 200000 250000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Subscribers (Thousands) 0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 FP Penetration Rate Discounted Subs RegularSubs FP Penetration 500See Section IV.A, Price Rivalry: Developments in Mobile Service Pricing Plans, supra. 501John C. Hodulik, et al., MetroPCS -Growth Stays Strong, +CF on the Way,UBS, UBS Investment Research, May8, 2009, at 2. 502In addition, UBS estimates that roughly two-thirds of AT&T's and Verizon Wireless's postpaid customers subscribe to family plans.
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-103A1_Rcd.pdf
    • Investment Research, Mar. 23, 2009, at 6. 514The Nielsen Company: Mobile Insights 2009. 9767 Federal Communications Commission FCC 11-103 Chart 12 Family Plan Subscribers and Penetration of Postpaid Base515 0% 2% 12% 35% 43% 51% 63% 65% 67% 0 50000 100000 150000 200000 250000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Subscribers (Thousands) 0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 FP Penetration Rate Discounted Subs Regular Subs FPPenetration 4. Mobile Wireless Subscribers by Age 168. In April 2009, Morgan Stanley estimated mobile wireless subscribership by age group (see Chart 13). While penetration rates are high at nearly every age group, they are highest among 18-to 24-year-olds, where penetration has reached 96 percent. The only age group with a
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-104A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-104A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-104A1.txt
    • 2013. As was done in the previous cycle based on the 2007 TRS Rate Methodology Order, this rate is adjusted annually by an inflation factor and an efficiency factor, and includes any appropriate exogenous costs submitted by providers. The inflation factor is the Gross Domestic Product minus the Price Index (GDP-PI), and the efficiency factor is the inflation factor minus 0.5 percent to account for productivity gains. We note that Hamilton and AT&T argue that the MARS rate should be applied to IP Relay. We are concerned about the practicality of adopting a MARS rate for IP Relay when there are no underlying intrastate TRS programs on which to base such a rate. At the same time, we recognize that the
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-110A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-110A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-110A1.txt
    • analog converter) in order to be able to continue viewing full power television stations over the air. In fact, a report issued by the National Telecommunications and Information Administration (``NTIA''), notes that the number of households that could not view digital television dropped significantly from 2.2 percent in June 2009 (at the time of the full power digital transition) to 0.5 percent in October 2009. With the full power transition now complete, and a vast majority of viewers thus able to receive digital broadcasts, we believe it is appropriate to require low power television stations to complete their transition to digital. We conclude that adoption of a transition date in 2012, as proposed in the Further Notice, would not be appropriate
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-120A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-120A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-120A1.txt
    • other operations, broadcasters operating pursuant to Section 74.24 have no right to claim interference protection from regularly authorized operations. EIBASS and NAB propose additional conditions that we do not believe are necessary or appropriate. EIBASS asks that the Commission impose a requirement that the newcomer POFS station cannot degrade the noise threshold of any existing ENG-RO site by more than 0.5 dB. Although EIBASS's proposal may be an appropriate standard for evaluating a proposed FS facility, we decline to adopt it as part of our rules. Generally, in lieu of mandating specific interference criteria in our rules, we expect applicants and licensees to work out interference issues in the frequency coordination process. In addition, NAB asks that the Commission impose secondary
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-160A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-160A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-160A1.txt
    • notch of all the amateur frequency bands. These documents include: 1) ITU-R Report SM.2158; 2) ITU-T G.9960; 3) IEEE P1901-2010; and 4) OFCOM Report on In-Home PLT devices. All of these documents mandate or recommend notching of the amateur frequencies. ITU-R Report SM.2158 states that the maximum allowable increase in the noise floor due to BPL emissions should not exceed 0.5 dB, based on the assumption that the fade margin of the amateur service in long distance communications is less than 1 dB. Based on this assumption, ARRL argues that a notch depth of 34 dB would be required if a 20-dB/decade extrapolation of the FCC emission limits is used and a notch depth of 43 dB would be needed if
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-161A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-161A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-161A1.txt
    • the Rural Broadband Benchmark shall be 0.25. For 2015, the annual transition factor for the variable component of the Rural Broadband Benchmark shall be 0.333. For 2016, the annual transition factor for the variable component of the Rural Broadband Benchmark shall be 0.416. For 2017, the annual transition factor for the variable component of the Rural Broadband Benchmark shall be 0.5. For 2018, the annual transition factor for the variable component of the Rural Broadband Benchmark shall be 0.583. For 2019, the annual transition factor for the variable component of the Rural Broadband Benchmark shall be 0.66. For 2020, the annual transition factor for the variable component of the Rural Broadband Benchmark shall be 0.75. For 2021 the annual transition factor
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-176A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-176A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-176A1.txt
    • evaluation period. MedRadio R&O at 3483-84 para. 32-35. 47 C.F.R. § 95.1209; MedRadio R&O at 3485 paras. 37-38. Under the existing rules, MedRadio devices in the 402-405 MHz band that meet the frequency monitoring requirements of 47 C.F.R. § 95.628(a) may transmit with a maximum power of 25 microwatts EIRP in a 300 kHz bandwidth. This would be equivalent to 0.5 milliwatts in a 6 MHz bandwidth, which is on par with the maximum power levels proposed by AMF. 47 C.F.R. § 95.639(f); AMF Comments Appendix B at 5. See MICS R&O at 21043-44 para. 8. NPRM at 3453 para. 26. See footnote 2, supra. AMF estimates that the costs of providing an initial model of an MMN system (consisting of
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-183A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-183A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-183A1.txt
    • Broadband 41.3 40.2 0.8 0.3 48.9 46.9 1.6 0.3 57.9 55.4 2.1 0.4 68.1 64.9 2.5 0.8 75.3 71.8 2.5 1.0 83.1 79.1 2.8 1.1 Fixed Transponder Agreements Managed Services 9.3 7.3 2.0 10.7 8.5 2.2 12.2 9.6 2.6 13.0 10.2 2.8 14.4 11.0 3.4 15.0 11.1 3.9 Mobile (Voice and Data) 1.7 2.0 2.1 2.2 2.2 2.3 Remote Sensing 0.5 0.4 0.4 0.7 1.0 1.0 TOTAL 52.8 62.0 72.6 84.0 93.0 101.3 Notes: Numbers may not sum exactly due to rounding. Definitions of the terms used in Table II.1 are included below. Report Methodology Any analysis of the nature and extent of competition in an industry requires a framework that identifies pertinent questions; organizes, evaluates, and interprets data; and reaches
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-183A1_Rcd.pdf
    • Broadband 41.3 40.2 0.8 0.3 48.9 46.9 1.6 0.3 57.9 55.4 2.1 0.4 68.1 64.9 2.5 0.8 75.3 71.8 2.5 1.0 83.1 79.1 2.8 1.1 Fixed Transponder Agreements15 Managed Services16 9.3 7.3 2.0 10.7 8.5 2.2 12.2 9.6 2.6 13.0 10.2 2.8 14.4 11.0 3.4 15.0 11.1 3.9 Mobile (Voice and Data) 1.7 2.0 2.1 2.2 2.2 2.3 Remote Sensing 0.5 0.4 0.4 0.7 1.0 1.0 TOTAL 52.8 62.0 72.6 84.0 93.0 101.3 Notes: Numbers may not sum exactly due to rounding . Definitions of the terms used in Table II.1 are included below.17 14 Data replicated from Futron Corp., Satellite Industry Association, State of the Satellite Industry Report (June 2011) 15 Includes capacity for DTH platforms. 16 Includes VSAT; Space
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-184A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-184A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-184A1.txt
    • ``X'') Factor, and Exogenous Costs. The basic formula takes a base rate and multiplies it by a factor that reflects an increase due to inflation, offset by a decrease due to efficiencies. The Inflation Factor will be the Gross Domestic Product - Price Index (GDP-PI)). The Efficiency Factor will be set as a figure equal to the Inflation Factor, less 0.5 percent (or 0.005) to account for productivity gains. As a result the rate for a particular year will equal the rate for the previous year, reduced by 0.5 percent (i.e., RateYear Y = RateYear Y-1 (1 - 0.005)). Reducing the rate by this amount will encourage VRS providers to become more efficient in providing the service. We will also adjust
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-25A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-25A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-25A1.txt
    • 122.75 MHz and 123.025 MHz. We believe that this selection of frequencies best balances the goal of maximizing the chance that the flight crew of an aircraft approaching an obstacle will hear the AVWS audible warnings with the need to avoid interference to other communications. OCAS proposes to limit the AVWS VHF transmitter to a maximum transmitter power of approximately 0.5 milliwatts, and an omnidirectional antenna with a maximum gain of +5 dBi. It also proposes that the audible warning not exceed two seconds in duration, with no more than six audible warnings transmitted in a single transmit cycle. We tentatively concur with these proposed technical and operational limits. We invite comment on our conclusion that these limits will minimize the
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-28A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-28A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-28A1.txt
    • While in the Rural NPRM the Commission tentatively concluded that the relevant contour was the principal community contour (24 FCC Rcd at 5245), upon further consideration we conclude that for purposes of evaluating reception service, the primary service area is more appropriate. 47 C.F.R. § 73.182(d). Pursuant to this rule section, the signal strength required for primary groundwave service is 0.5 mV/m for communities under 2,500 population, and 2.0 mV/m for communities of 2,500 or more. Consequently, communities with populations of 2,500 or more, situated between the 2.0 mV/m and 0.5 mV/m groundwave contours, are not considered to receive service from the AM station or proposal in question. We likewise, on our own consideration, conclude that the threshold of five transmission
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-50A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-50A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-50A1.txt
    • ability of the utility to temporarily stop the clock for legitimately exceptional circumstances. We adopt a modified timeline for wireless attachments above the communications space, for which we provide a total of up to 178 days and a complaint remedy. We also adopt longer timelines for requests to attach to a large number of poles (more than 300 poles or 0.5 percent of a utility's total poles within a state, whichever is less), for which we provide an additional 15 days for survey and 45 days for make-ready, for a total of up to 208 days for attachments in the communications space and 238 days for wireless attachments above the communications space. Attachments. We also conclude that if an electric utility
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-93A1_Rcd.pdf
    • Plane Angular Offset between Satellites (degrees) 5 km 10 km 15 km 20 km 25 km 30 km 35 km 40 km Satellite Orbital Radii Difference X-Y Plane Angular Offsetvs.Orbital Separation in Degrees Longitude for Various Orbital Inclination Differences between Satellites 0.00 10.00 20.00 30.00 40.00 50.00 60.00 70.00 80.00 90.00 0.05 0.1 0.15 0.2 0.25 0.3 0.35 0.4 0.45 0.5 SatelliteOrbital Separation (degrees) X-Y Plane Angular Offset between Satellites (degrees) 0.05º 0.1º 0.15º 0.2º 0.25º 0.3º Satellite Orbital Inclination Difference (total) 8970
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-12-29A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-12-29A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-12-29A1.txt
    • to any person or entity having any interest whatsoever, or any connection with a primary FM station. Interested and connected parties extend to group owners, corporate parents, shareholders, officers, directors, employees, general and limited partners, family members and business associates. For the purposes of this paragraph, the protected contour of the primary station shall be defined as follows: the predicted 0.5mV/m contour for commercial Class B stations, the predicted 0.7 mV/m contour for commercial Class B1 stations and the predicted 1 mV/m field strength contour for all other FM radio broadcast stations. The contours shall be as predicted in accordance with § 73.313(a) through (d) of this chapter. In the case of an FM radio broadcast station authorized with facilities in
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-12-44A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-12-44A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-12-44A1.txt
    • to identify documents beyond the retention period to be flagged for review by broadcasters to be eliminated from the database; amongst others. (...continued from previous page) (continued....) Federal Communications Commission FCC 12-44 Federal Communications Commission FCC 12-44 Public file pages to upload w/in 6 months In-House cost per page Outsourced cost per page In-House Total Outsourced Total WBAL-TV 998 0.1 0.5 $99.80 $499.00 WMAR-TV 987 0 0 $0.00 $0.00 WJZ-TV 844 0.1 0.5 $84.40 $422.00 WNUV 251 0.1 0.5 $25.10 $125.50 WBFF 2094 0.1 0.5 $209.40 $1,047.00 WUTB 2126 0.1 0.5 $212.60 $1,063.00 WMPT 2180 0 0 $0.00 $0.00 WMPB 2180 0 0 $0.00 $0.00 Total 11660 $631.30 $3,156.50 Average 1457.5 $78.91 $394.56 € Œ � ° ì ú � $
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-95-316A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-95-316A1.txt
    • 19.7 GHz, "the power flux-density at the Earth's surface produced by emissions from a space station, including emissions from a reflecting satellite, for all conditions and for all methods of modulation, shall not exceed the following values: -115 dB (W/m2) in any 1 MHz band for angles of arrival between 0 and 5 degrees above the horizontal plane; -115 + 0.5( - 5) dB (W/m2) in any 1 MHz band for angles of arrival (in degrees) between 5 and 25 degrees above the horizontal plane; -105 dB (W/m2) in any 1 MHz band for angles of arrival between 25 and 90 degrees above the horizontal plane. These limits relate to the power flux-density which would be obtained under assumed free-space propagation
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-96-215A1.pdf
    • unit only according to any applicable treaty to which the United States is a party. The FCC will make public notice of any such conditions. (b) Your use of an FRS unit must not cause harmful interference to a FCC monitoring facility. Doing so could result in imposition of restrictions upon the operation of the FRS unit within 0.8 km (0.5 mile) of the facility by its Engineer-in-Charge. (Geographical coordinates of the facilities that require protection are listed in § 0.121(c) of this chapter.) (c) The FCC may impose additional restrictions on a FRS station if the station is located at a point within the National Radio Quiet Zone (an area within the States of Maryland. Virginia and West Virginia). The
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-96-325A1.pdf
    • and were, therefore, not directly reported, but the staff witness testified that the calculation of direct, shared, and common costs is less than one-half his proposed rate of 0.6 cents ($0.006) per minute of use for terminations routed through the tandem-office switch. The Maryland Commission ultimately adopted 1919 rates of 0.3 cents ($0.003) per minute of use end-office-switch terminations and 0.5 cents ($0.005) per minute of use for terminations at the tandem switch. 1920 808. The Illinois Commission has adopted a rate equal to 0.5 cents ($0.005) per minute of use for terminations routed directly through end-office switches and 0.75 cents ($0.0075) per minute of use for Federal Communications Commission 96-325 Illinois Commission comments at Attachment C (Illinois Commerce Commission Docket
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-99-333A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-99-333A1.pdf
    • amended by revising subsection 101.111(a)(4) to read as follows: § 101.111 Emission Limitations. (1) * * * (a) * * * (4) For DEMS channels in the 17,700-19,700 and 24,250-25,250 MHz bands: (i) On any frequency removed from the center frequency of the DEMS channel by more than 50 percent of that channel's bandwidth: A = 35 + 0.75(F - 0.5B) dB (in any 4 kHz channel), or A = 11 + 0.75(F - 0.5B) dB (in any 1 MHz channel), but in no event greater than 80 decibels; A = attenuation (in decibels) below mean output power level contained within the DEMS channel for a given polarization B = bandwidth of DEMS channel (in MHz) F = absolute value of
  • http://licensing.fcc.gov/prod/cdbs/forms/prod/faq_exhibits.htm
    • first column containing depression angle values and second (and subsequent, when applicable) column(s) containing relative field values. When applicable, the first row shall list the azimuth angle being tabulated. The range of depression angles shall be 10 degrees above horizontal (-10 degrees depression) to 90 degrees below horizontal (90 degrees depression) and shall include data points spaced not more than 0.5-degree between -5 and 10 degrees depression angle, and not more than 5 degrees elsewhere. All pattern minima and maxima shall be included. Additional elevation antenna (or radiation) pattern data may be included following the column corresponding to 350 degrees TN so that the direction(s) of maximum and minimum radiation are provided. A relative field value of 1 shall correspond to
  • http://licensing.fcc.gov/prod/cdbs/forms/prod/faq_informal.htm
    • A confirmation screen will be displayed when the form is submitted successfully. Q. OMB Number/Paperwork Reduction Act information for Informal Forms. The following notice applies to CDBS informal filings unless they have their own Paperwork Reduction Act notice. FCC NOTICE REQUIRED BY THE PAPERWORK REDUCTION ACT We have estimated that each response to this collection of information will take from 0.5 to 5 hours. Our estimate includes the time to read the instructions, look through existing records, gather and maintain the required data, and actually complete and review the form or response. If you have any comments on this burden estimate, or on how we can improve the collection and reduce the burden it causes you, please e-mail them to pra@fcc.gov
  • http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Notices/1999/fcc99120.pdf http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Notices/1999/fcc99120.txt http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Notices/1999/fcc99120.wp
    • HAI values for maximum equipped lines per switch would have only a minimal impact on the overall forward-looking cost estimation because less than 2 percent of wire centers have more than 80,000 lines. A review of the data indicates that, of the 12,506 wire centers served by non-rural LECs, only 189 (1.5 percent) have more than 80,000 lines and 57 (0.5 percent) have more than 100,000 lines. See HAI Feb. 3, 1998 model submission. 332 HAI Dec. 11, 1997 submission, Inputs Portfolio at 80. 333 HAI Dec. 11, 1997 submission, Inputs Portfolio at 80. 334 BCPM April 30, 1998 submission, Switch Model Inputs at 20-21. BCPM defines Switch Percent Line Fill as the ratio between the number of working lines on
  • http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/fcc00193.doc http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/fcc00193.pdf http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/fcc00193.txt
    • a productivity offset, or X-factor. In the Commission's LEC price cap formula, the X-factor represents the amount by which LECs can be expected to outperform economy-wide productivity gains. The X-factor adopted in the LEC Price Cap Order initiating price cap regulation for the largest LECs consisted of a component based on historical LEC productivity, and an additional productivity obligation of 0.5 percent as a consumer productivity dividend (CPD) to assign the first productivity gains to customers in the form of lower rates. Initially, price cap LECs were required to share a portion of their earnings in excess of specified rates of return with their access customers by temporarily reducing the price cap ceiling in a subsequent period. In 1990, the Commission
  • http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/fcc01029.doc http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/fcc01029.pdf http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/fcc01029.txt
    • Performance Data, Measure No. 55.1-03 (``Average Installation Interval - DSL - Line Sharing - Requires No Conditioning''), at 271-No. 55.1. In September 2000, SWBT provisioned over 1,700 line shared loops to its separate affiliate in Kansas and over 2,000 line shared loops to its separate affiliate in Oklahoma. See SWBT Chapman Reply Aff. at para. 18. In Oklahoma, SWBT missed 0.5 percent and 0.3 percent of its installation due dates for line shared DSL loops provided to its affiliate in the months of September and October 2000 respectively. During the same period in Kansas, SWBT missed 0.2 percent and 1.2 percent of its installation due dates. See SWBT Aggregated Performance Data, Measure No. 58-09 (``Percent SWBT Caused Missed Due Dates -
  • http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1998/da981130.html http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1998/da981130.pdf http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1998/da981130.txt http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1998/da981130.wp
    • for the schools and libraries support mechanism in the third quarter of 1998, the "total program costs" for the third quarter (i.e., $325 million) is less than the demand that SLC projected. Third Quarter 1998 -- ($ millions) Program Program Demand Administrative Expenses Interest Income[14]^(10) Total Program Costs Schools and Libraries 690.0[15]^(11) 4.4 (0.0)[16]^(12) 325.0 Rural Health Care 24.3 1.2 (0.5) 25.0 Subtotal 714.3 5.6 (0.5) 350.0 High Cost 414.1 0.8 (0.7) 414.2 Low Income 125.3 0.4 (1.0) 124.7 Subtotal 539.4 1.2 (1.7) 538.9 TOTAL 1,253.7 6.8 (2.2) 888.9 Based on information contained in the Universal Service Worksheets, FCC Form 457, USAC submitted on May 1, 1998, end-user telecommunications revenues for the 1997 calendar year. On May 14, 1998, USAC submitted
  • http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/lcomp99-1.pdf
    • Service Worksheets TRS Worksheet Data: *** Revenues reported by service providers that filed TRS Worksheets but not Universal Service Worksheets: Per minute access 349.8 16.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 21.1 386.9 90.4 4.1 Other local service revenue 143.5 33.2 4.1 6.3 0.9 20.5 208.5 68.8 15.9 Local service revenue 493.3 49.2 4.1 6.3 0.9 41.7 595.4 82.9 8.3 Mobile service revenue 0.5 0.0 0.3 131.6 57.0 0.0 189.4 0.3 0.0 Toll service revenue 26.6 0.8 56.3 2.6 23.1 1,423.1 1,532.4 1.7 0.1 Total telecommunications revenue 520.4 50.0 60.6 140.4 81.0 1,464.8 2,317.2 22.5 2.2 not included on Universal Service Worksheets USF and TRS worksheet data combined: ** Per minute access 18,231.6 379.8 0.0 26.0 0.2 198.418,836.0 96.8 2.0 Other local service revenue
  • http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/News_Releases/1998/et8002a.pdf http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/News_Releases/1998/et8002a.txt http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/News_Releases/1998/et8002a.wp
    • 3.3 305.0 22274 17 22184 17 0.0 0.0 100.0 AK NORTH POLE 4 20 213.8 485.0 30801 79 30801 79 0.0 0.0 100.0 AK SITKA 13 2 1.0 33.0 6622 9 1132 8 0.0 0.0 100.0 AL ANNISTON 40 58 264.5 350.0 20802 1137 17127 616 0.2 0.0 98.0 AL BESSEMER 17 18 186.0 675.0 32102 1304 28690 1131 2.5 0.5 99.7 AL BIRMINGHAM 6 50 1000.0 420.0 35806 1598 34251 1547 0.0 0.0 96.5 AL BIRMINGHAM 10 53 1000.0 404.0 31917 1522 28399 1428 2.0 2.2 99.5 AL BIRMINGHAM 13 52 1000.0 408.0 32879 1564 29111 1465 0.0 0.0 99.5 AL BIRMINGHAM 42 30 166.3 421.0 26176 1333 23781 1253 0.4 0.4 100.0 AL BIRMINGHAM 68 36 50.0 314.0 14489
  • http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Orders/1997/fc97115a.pdf http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Orders/1997/fc97115a.wp
    • 823 21115 792 0.7 0.3 100.0 ALHUNTSVILLE 54 41 51.1 515.0 18818 716 18097 704 0.7 0.3 100.0 B-7 DIGITALTELEVISION EXISTINGNTSC SERVICE ------------------------------------------ DTV/ DURINGTRANSITION CURRENTSERVICE NEWINTERFERENCE NTSC NTSCDTV DTV ANTENNA----------------- --------------- ----------------------- AREA STATEANDCITY CHANCHANPOWER HAAT AREA PEOPLE AREA PEOPLE AREA PEOPLE MATCH (kW) (m) (Sqkm)(thous) (Sqkm)(thous) (%NLArea)(%NLPop) (%) ALLOUISVILLE 43 42 155.7 275.0 14437 267 14481 267 1.0 0.5 99.4 ALMOBILE 5 27 1000.0 581.0 49660 1292 49268 1310 0.0 0.0 99.9 ALMOBILE 10 9 15.7 381.0 31801 1009 30422 998 0.0 0.0 100.0 ALMOBILE 15 26 312.3 521.0 25918 1007 25722 1039 1.8 1.0 99.8 ALMOBILE 21 20 190.4 436.0 21862 941 21326 882 0.3 0.1 100.0 ALMOBILE 42 18 50.0 183.0 11337 528 11453 533 0.5 0.1
  • http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Orders/1997/fcc97303.pdf http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Orders/1997/fcc97303.txt http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Orders/1997/fcc97303.wp
    • between the radiating antennas and the body of the user or nearby persons. 20 Federal Communications Commission FCC 97-303 1.5 watts ERP was based on calculations of the approximate power level at which a device, such as a mobile cellular phone operating on frequencies around 800-900 MHz, would be expected to exceed the applicable MPE power density limit of about 0.5 mW/cm2 at a distance of 20 cm from the radiating antenna. For higher frequencies, above 1.5 GHz, the MPE limit for power density is less restrictive (1.0 mW/cm2), and, therefore, a less restrictive power exclusion threshold can be justified. Using similar calculations, a power exclusion threshold of 3 watts ERP is appropriate for mobile devices operating above 1.5 GHz. 51.
  • http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Orders/1998/fc98024.pdf
    • "emissions mask" to require that: 1) in the first 500 kHz from the authorized channel edge, transmitter emissions must be attenuated no less than 47 dB below the average transmitted power; 2) more than 6 MHz from the channel edge, emissions must be attenuated no less than 110 dB below the average transmitted power; and 3) at any frequency between 0.5 and 6 MHz from the channel edge, emissions must be attenuated no less than the value determined by the following formula:65 Attenuation in dB = -11.5()f +3.6); where: )f = frequency difference in MHz from the edge of the channel. All attenuation limits are based on a measurement bandwidth of 500 kHz. This mask will lower Federal Communications Commission FCC
  • http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Orders/1998/fc98024a.pdf http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Orders/1998/fc98024a.txt http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Orders/1998/fc98024a.wp
    • 3.3 305.0 22274 17 22184 17 0.0 0.0 100.0 AK NORTH POLE 4 20 213.8 485.0 30801 79 30801 79 0.0 0.0 100.0 AK SITKA 13 2 1.0 33.0 6622 9 1132 8 0.0 0.0 100.0 AL ANNISTON 40 58 264.5 350.0 20802 1137 17127 616 0.2 0.0 98.0 AL BESSEMER 17 18 186.0 675.0 32102 1304 28690 1131 2.5 0.5 99.7 AL BIRMINGHAM 6 50 1000.0 420.0 35806 1598 34251 1547 0.0 0.0 96.5 AL BIRMINGHAM 10 53 1000.0 404.0 31917 1522 28399 1428 2.0 2.2 99.5 AL BIRMINGHAM 13 52 1000.0 408.0 32879 1564 29111 1465 0.0 0.0 99.5 AL BIRMINGHAM 42 30 166.3 421.0 26176 1333 23781 1253 0.4 0.4 100.0 AL BIRMINGHAM 68 36 50.0 314.0 14489
  • http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Orders/2000/fcc00418.doc http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Orders/2000/fcc00418.pdf http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Orders/2000/fcc00418.txt
    • 119.0 Earth station location Denver, CO Washington, D.C. Seattle, WA Miami, FL DBS satellite e.i.r.p. towards the Earth station location dBW 48.8 52.6 46.7 52.6 Earth station elevation above mean sea level mm 1.58 0.01 0.01 0.0 Earth station elevation angle degrees 41.8 27.6 35.2 37.7 Free space loss dB 205.9 206.1 206.0 205.9 Earth station antenna miss-pointing error dB 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 Atmospheric absorption dB 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 Clear-sky receive system noise temperature Kelvin 85 85 85 85 Clear-sky earth station antenna G/T dB 14.5 14.5 14.5 14.5 C/I for other assignments in the BSS Plan dB 20.0 20.0 20.0 20.0 Clear-sky feeder link C/(N+I) dB 26.2 26.2 26.2 26.2 Clear-sky carrier-to-noise plus interference ratio dB 10.7 13.6
  • http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Public_Notices/2001/d012072a.pdf
    • reliably achieved for significant interferers 22 Base Station Architecture 23 Antenna Arrays ! Wide variety of geometries and element types possible " arrangements of off-the-shelf single elements " custom arrays ! Array size " vertical extent determined by element gain/pattern as usual " horizontal extent, typically 3-5 lambda ! Array of eight 10 dBi elements at 2 GHz is about 0.5 x 0.75 m " small! " conformal arrays for aesthetics 24 Comments ! Fundamental concept is coherent processing ! Generally applicable to all air interfaces ! Parallel, independent processing on all traffic resources ! Many important issues that are not addressed here " estimation/prediction of radio environment (will comment later) " processing requirements & architectures (easily > 1Gbps array data
  • http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Notices/1998/fcc98117.pdf http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Notices/1998/fcc98117.wp
    • Station Assignments by Using Directional Antennas, Report and Order in MM Docket 87-121, 4 FCC Rcd 1681, 1687 (1989). 132 See 47 C.F.R. § 74.1203. 133 See 5 U.S.C. § 553(a)(1), (b)(3)(B); 47 C.F.R. § 1.412(c). 32 of class or location on the FM band.130 Commercial Class B and B1 FM stations, however, traditionally have received greater protection to their 0.5 mV/m (54 dBu) and 0.7 mV/m (57 dBu) contours, respectively.131 Accordingly, we propose to modify Section 73.509(b) to require Class D stations to protect commercial Class B and B1 stations, as well as NCE FM Class B and B1 stations operating on commercial channels, to their respective 54 dBu and 57 dBu contours. We invite comment as to whether Class
  • http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Notices/2001/fcc01329.pdf http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Notices/2001/fcc01329.txt
    • Syracuse, NY 78 Auburn NY Clear Channel Communications 1949 Feb-00 500 3.9 1.39 B WXBB FM Christian Syracuse, NY 78 DeRuyter NY Clear Channel Communications 1948 Apr-00 0 0 0 B WRCU FM Variety Syracuse, NY 78 Hamilton NY Colgate University 1970 0 0 0 A WDCW AM Christian Syracuse, NY 78 Syracuse NY Crawford Broadcasting Company 1922 Jul-93 0 0.5 0 B WOLF AM Children Syracuse, NY 78 Syracuse NY Fox, Craig 1940 Oct-82 100 0 0 C WVOA FM Christian Syracuse, NY 78 Mexico NY Fox, Craig 1996 Jul-96 250 0 0 A WSIV AM Christian Syracuse, NY 78 E. Syracuse NY Fox, Craig 1955 Sep-96 100 0 0 B WOLF FM Children Syracuse, NY 78 Oswego NY Fox,
  • http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Orders/1998/fcc98281.pdf
    • and available for use when the main antenna is out of service for repairs or replacement. An auxiliary antenna may be located at the same transmitter site as the station's main antenna or at a separate site. The service contour of the auxiliary antenna may not extend beyond the following corresponding contour for the main facility: (1) AM stations: The 0.5 mV/m field strength contours. (2) FM stations: The 1.0 mV/m field strength contours. (3) TV stations: The Grade B coverage contours. An application for an auxiliary antenna for an AM station filed pursuant to paragraphs (b) or (c) of this section must contain a map showing the 0.5 mV/m field strength contours of both the main and auxiliary facilities. *
  • http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Orders/1998/fcc98315.pdf http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Orders/1998/fcc98315.txt http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Orders/1998/fcc98315.wp
    • 3.3 305.0 22274 17 22184 17 0.0 0.0 100.0 AK NORTH POLE 4 20 213.8 485.0 30801 79 30801 79 0.0 0.0 100.0 AK SITKA 13 2 1.0 33.0 6622 9 1132 8 0.0 0.0 100.0 AL ANNISTON 40 58 264.5 350.0 20802 1137 17127 616 0.2 0.0 98.0 AL BESSEMER 17 18 186.0 675.0 32102 1304 28690 1131 2.5 0.5 99.7 AL BIRMINGHAM 6 50 1000.0 420.0 35806 1598 34251 1547 0.0 0.0 96.5 AL BIRMINGHAM 10 53 1000.0 404.0 31917 1522 28399 1428 2.0 2.2 99.5 AL BIRMINGHAM 13 52 1000.0 408.0 32879 1564 29111 1465 0.0 0.0 99.5 AL BIRMINGHAM 42 30 166.3 421.0 26176 1333 23781 1253 0.4 0.4 100.0 AL BIRMINGHAM 68 36 50.0 314.0 14489
  • http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Orders/2000/fcc00019.doc http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Orders/2000/fcc00019.pdf
    • receivers could potentially experience degradation from interference is small, generally 1 km or less from an LPFM antenna site. This interference analysis is shown in the following table: LPFM Potential Interference Radius Receiver Category Desired Signal Level -45 dBm -55 dBm -65 dBm Clock 0.3 km 0.7 km 2.1 km Portable 1.0 km 0.9 km 1.0 km Personal 0.4 km 0.5 km 0.5 km Further, we believe that this analysis provides a conservative estimate of actual interference potential of LPFM given NAB's performance criteria and the fact that NAB's sample included some of the poorer performing radios among the four studies. In addition, as pointed out by Rappaport and others, whether interference in fact occurs to FM listening is dependent on
  • http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Orders/2000/fcc00115.doc http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Orders/2000/fcc00115.pdf http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Orders/2000/fcc00115.txt
    • used for regular program service having power ratings appropriate for the authorized operating power(s). (b) There is no maximum power rating limit for FM, TV or Class A TV station transmitters, however, the maximum rated transmitter power of a main transmitter stalled at an AM station shall be as follows: ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Maximum rated Authorized power transmitter power (kW) ------------------------------------------------------------------------ 0.25, 0.5, or 1 kW......................................... 1 2.5 kW..................................................... 5 5 or 10 kW................................................. 10 25 or 50 kW................................................ 50 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ * * * * * 31. Section 73.1675 is amended by revising paragraphs (a)(1) and (c)(1) to read as follows: § 73.1675 Auxiliary antennas. (a)(1) An auxiliary antenna is one that is permanently installed and available for use when the main antenna
  • http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Orders/2000/fcc00349.pdf
    • FM stations; or if it would result in new or increased overlap with an LP100 station, as set forth below: (1) * * * (2) * * * (3) * * * (4) LP100 stations (Protected Contour: 1 mV/m) Frequency separation Interference contour of proposed translator station Protected contour of LP100 LPFM station Cochannel 200 kHz 0.1 mV/m (40 dBu) 0.5 mV/m (54 dBu) 1 mV/m (60 dBu) 1 mV/m (60 dBu) Note: For the purposes of determining overlap pursuant to this subsection, LPFM applications and permits that have not yet been licensed must be considered as operating with the maximum permitted facilities. All LPFM TIS stations must be protected on the basis of a nondirectional antenna. * * * *
  • http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Orders/2000/fcc00368.pdf
    • to C...................................... 270 (168) 209 (130) 99 (61) Section 73.315 is amended by deleting the Note. Section 73.509 is amended by revising subsection (a) to read as follows: (a) * * * * * Contour of Contour of other Frequency separation proposed stationstation Co-channel......................0.1mV/m (40 dBu).. 1 mV/m (60 dBu). 1 mV/m (60 dBu)... 0.1 mV/m (40 dBu). 200 kHz......................... 0.5 mV/m (54 dBu).. 1 mV/m (60 dBu). 1 mV/m (60 dBu)... 0.5 mV/m (54 dBu). 400 kHz/600 kHz ........ 100 mV/m (100 dBu) 1 mV/m (60 dBu). 1 mV/m (60 dBu)... 100 mV/m (100 dBu). A new Section 73.515 is added as follows: § 73.515 NCE FM Transmitter Location The transmitter location shall be chosen so that, on the basis
  • http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Comments/fcc98055/210097-1.pdf
    • design - 5 percent, prototype to manufacturing - 8 percent, and manufacturing startup - 1 percent. The tables below show the calculations from this model. 46 Program Type A B C D Average % MIX: 31.0 48.8 20.0 .2 100 * Months Months Months Months Months Function HC Min Max HC Min Max HC Min Max HC MinMaxHCMinMax Research 2 0.5 1 4 1 3 10 3 6 20 6 12 5 1.3 3 Specs/Design 3 1 2 6 3 8 20 10 18 100 18 24 8 3.88.17 Proto to Manuf 3 1 5 6 5 10 20 18 24 100 24 36 8 6.411.3 Manuf Startup 6 1 2 10 2 8 30 6 12 160 12 24 13
  • http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Orders/1998/fcc98046.pdf http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Orders/1998/fcc98046.wp
    • 31, 1996); RFW Petition at 1, 4-5 (recommending a five-year deferral of principal and interest payments); Urban Communicators Petition at ii, 2, 5-7 (asking for an extension of the suspension until March 31, 1999, and two additional one-year deferrals, so long as licensees make certain demonstrations of financial ability and substantial construction progress and pay an interest rate increased by 0.5 percent for the deferral period); CONXUS Opposition at 6 (agreeing with NextWave and Alpine); Duluth PCS, et al. Opposition at 5 (advocating a five-year deferral of payment obligations); and Polycell Opposition at 5 (same as Duluth PCS, et al.). See also The Honorable Barbara Boxer ex parte filing at 1 (asking the Commission to consider a "limited deferral"); The Honorable
  • http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Orders/1998/fcc98191.pdf http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Orders/1998/fcc98191.txt http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Orders/1998/fcc98191.wp
    • Motorola plan does not, in our estimation, provide enough spectrum for nationwide interoperability. The Florida plan (which does not appear to use the entire allocation) and NPSTC hold too little in reserve. 107 A detailed channelization plan is given in Appendix H. 24 Commenter's Suggested Spectrum & Channel Allocations Motorola NPSTC Florida INTEROPERABILITY Narrowband Wideband Total 80 x 6.25 = 0.5 -- 0.5 MHz 64 x 12.5 = 0.8 12 x 125 = 1.5 2.3 MHz 120 x 12.5 = 1.50 8 x 150 = 1.2 2.7 MHz GENERAL USE Narrowband Mid-size Wideband Total 1520 x 6.25 = 9.5 -- 60 x 100 = 6.0 15.5 MHz 800 x 12.5 = 10.0 -- 60 x 125 = 7.5 17.5 MHz 776
  • http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Reports/fcc00289.pdf
    • Aug. 5, 1999, at 6. 6 Inquiry Concerning The Deployment Of Advanced Telecommunications Capability To All Americans In A Reasonable And Timely Fashion, And Possible Steps To Accelerate Such Deployment Pursuant To Section 706 Of The Telecommunications Act Of 1996, Report, 14 FCC Rcd 2398, 2422. 7 Id. at 2406. Figure 1. Maximum Downstream Speeds Using WLL 155 25 10 0.5 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 Megabytes per Second Mobile Telephone Wireless Cable Upperbands Unlicensed Federal Communications Commission FCC 00-289 E-3 C. Service Providers 1. Cellular (800 MHz) / Broadband PCS (1900 MHz) In the United States, the current WLL in these bands is still in an early stage of development, is currently targeted at low-use/residential
  • http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireline_Competition/Orders/2002/fcc02118.pdf
    • b,c,d,e MR-4-08-3550 % Out of Service > 24 Hours 25.77 NA 18.83 0 21.65 0 28.76 0 23.04 0 b,c,d,e MR-5 - Repeat Trouble Reports MR-5-01-3550 % Repeat Reports within 30 Days 15.94 NA 14.64 0 13.37 0 13.86 25 13.56 0 b,c,d,e Maintenance - POTS Platform MR-2 - Trouble Report Rate MR-2-02-3140 Network Trouble Report Rate ­ Platform 0.92 0.5 0.77 0.64 0.57 1.11 0.67 1.13 0.58 0.18 MR-2-03-3140 Network Trouble Report Rate ­ Central Office 0.14 0.17 0.06 0 0.04 0 0.05 0.19 0.06 0 MR-2-04-3140 % Subsequent Reports 11.59 20 10.31 0 11.71 0 22.22 0 a,b,c,e MR-2-05-3140 % CPE/TOK/FOK Trouble Report Rate 0.82 0.66 0.65 0.32 0.51 0.16 0.57 0.54 MR-3 - Missed Repair Appointments MR-3-01-3144 %
  • http://transition.fcc.gov/Speeches/Furchtgott_Roth/Statements/sthfr925.html http://transition.fcc.gov/Speeches/Furchtgott_Roth/Statements/sthfr925.txt http://transition.fcc.gov/Speeches/Furchtgott_Roth/Statements/sthfr925.wp
    • contain terms that would have "significant consequences for the telecommunications industry" if more generally applied. Surely these are "new or novel" issues of law and policy that must be decided by the Commission. Indeed, the Commission's rules limit the general grants of delegated authority to the bureaus to "matters which are minor or routine or settled in nature." 47 CFR 0.5(c). By definition issues that are "unique" and "significant" cannot at the same time be "routine" and "minor." Indeed, in our WTO Implementation Order, the Commission expressly stated that it would consider any legitimate concerns regarding national security and law enforcement issues in the context of a particular request for authorization.[5]^(3) The Commission has not clarified its concerns or policies in
  • http://transition.fcc.gov/Speeches/Tristani/Statements/stgt916.html http://transition.fcc.gov/Speeches/Tristani/Statements/stgt916.txt http://transition.fcc.gov/Speeches/Tristani/Statements/stgt916.wp
    • substantial portion of the American public, and because the merger implicates foreign ownership and national security under our nascent WTO Implementation Order, this merger warranted the attention of the full Commission, as opposed to its staff. Certainly, pursuant to Section 5(c)(1) of the Communications Act, we may delegate many of our functions to our professional staff, including merger review. Section 0.5(c) of our Rules, interpreting that grant of statutory authority, holds that "the Commission has delegated authority to its staff to act on matters which are minor or routine or settled in nature and those in which immediate action is necessary."[3]^(1) (emphasis added) Neither the size of this merger nor the issues it raises, should be deemed "minor or routine." Today,
  • http://transition.fcc.gov/Speeches/misc/statements/bafranca.doc http://transition.fcc.gov/Speeches/misc/statements/bafranca.html http://transition.fcc.gov/Speeches/misc/statements/bafranca.txt
    • the following table: LPFM Potential Interference Radius Based on NAB Tests Receiver Category Desired Signal Level -45 dBm (Close to Station) -55 dBm (~Principle Community) -65 dBm (~Protected Service) Clock 0.3 km (0.2 mi.) 0.7 km (0.4 mi.) 2.1 km (1.3 mi.) Portable 1.0 km (0.6 mi.) 0.9 km (0.6 mi.) 1.0 km (0.6 mi.) Personal 0.4 km (0.3 mi.) 0.5 km (0.3 mi.) 0.5 km (0.3 mi.) The above Table shows the approximate radius around an LPFM station where interference could potentially occur to a 3rd adjacent channel full service station with different types of radios, based on the NAB test data. As indicated in the Table, the area of potential interference depends on the type of radio used and
  • http://transition.fcc.gov/cgb/dro/comments/99339/5507117144.pdf http://transition.fcc.gov/cgb/dro/comments/99339/5507117144.txt
    • MTWTFSS I:WPM-1l:WPM MTWTFSS 8:00PM-1l:OOPM MTWTF8.S &OOPM-1l:OOPM MTWTFSS 8:WPM-11 :OOPH MTWTFSS8:WPM-1l:WPM MTWTFSS .SzWPM-1l:OOPM MTWTFSS 8:OOPM.11 :WPM MTWTFSS &OOPM-1 1 :OOPM For explanatiin of symbols, see Boilerplate. Copyright 2000 Nielsen Media Research 1607 1511 1348 1303 1221 1077 944 933 658 607 546 541 540 503 458 419 356 329 295 1.6 1.5 1.3 1.3 1.3 1.2 1.1 0.9 0.9 0.7 0.6 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 04 0.4 03 0.3 2.7 2.6 2.2 2.2 2.2 2 1.9 1.5 1.5 1.2 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.7 0.7 0.5 0.5 56.7 58.7 58.7 58.7 58.7 58.7 58.7 58.7 58.7 58.7 58.7 58.7 50.7 56.7 56.7 58.7 58.7 58.7 58.7 58.7 NielsenN National People Meter Page 1 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE The undersigned, Jette Ward,
  • http://transition.fcc.gov/cgb/dro/trs_history_docket.html
    • 2, fifth bullet, the last sentence is revised to read as follows: The VRS rates shall be effective for the 2007-2008 through 2009-2010 Fund years, beginning on the first day of the month following the effective date of this Order, subject to annual adjustment as set forth below; (3) Paragraph 47, in the second-to-last sentence, "0.05 percent" is replaced by "0.5 percent"; (4) Paragraph 55, in the last sentence, "0.05 percent" is replaced by "0.5 percent"; (5) Paragraph 56, in the second-to-last sentence, "0.05 percent" is replaced by "0.5 percent"; (6) Paragraph 67, in the second-to-last sentence, "1,000,000" is replaced by "500,000"; (7) Paragraph 88, in the second-to-last sentence, delete ", as raised below in the FNPRM,[.]"; (8) Paragraph 103, in
  • http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-304359A1.html
    • the District Director, San Francisco Office, Western Region, Enforcement Bureau: 1. This is a Notice of Violation ("Notice") issued pursuant to Section 1.89 of the Commission's Rules, to Churchill County Telephone and Telegraph registrant of antenna structure #1012853 in Fallon, Nevada. 2. On September 28, 2010, agents of the Enforcement Bureau's San Francisco Office inspected antenna structure #1012853 located approximately 0.5 mile southeast of Fallon Municipal Airport in Fallon, Nevada, and observed the following violation: 47 C.F.R. S: 17.21: "Antenna structures shall be painted and lighted when: (a) they exceed 60.96 meters (200 feet) in height above the ground or they require special aeronautical study." The FCC Antenna Structure Registration for antenna structure # 1012853 indicates painting and lighting in accordance
  • http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2002/FCC-02-112A1.html
    • Regulatory, 1401 I Street, N.W., Suite 1100, Washington, D.C. 20005. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION William F. Caton Acting Secretary _________________________ 1 We note that the Enforcement Bureau issued the Notice of Apparent Liability in this case under its delegated authority, but has now referred the matter to the Commission given the significance of the challenge to the Commission's authority. 47 C.F.R. 0.5(c) (``the staff is at liberty to refer any matter at any stage to the Commission for action, upon concluding that it involves matters warranting the Commission's consideration''). 2 47 U.S.C. 218, 403, 154(i), 154(j). 3 SBC Communications, Inc., Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture, 16 FCC Rcd 19370 (2001) (``NAL''). 4 See Oct. 1, 2001 Letter from Charles W. Kelley,
  • http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2004/DA-04-3267A1.html
    • coordination.16 Uniradio asserted that, under the circumstances, any enforcement action by the Commission, including revocation of its Section 325(c) permit, is not warranted.17 5. On March 26, 2004, NIBC filed a reply to Uniradio's response.18 NIBC maintained, and provided evidence, that Station XEMO's operations at its current antenna site has created further overlap of its contour to Station KLRA(AM)'s protected 0.5 mV/m contour.19 NIBC further maintained that, due to the increased overlap, Station XEMO's utilization of a narrow bandwidth and reduction to a power level of 5 kW have not proven effective in redressing the continuing substantial interference to Station KRLA(AM).20 Finally, NIBC maintained that Uniradio knew or should have known that Station XEMO's operations at its current site had not
  • http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2004/FCC-04-196A1.html
    • that a copy of this Memorandum Opinion and Order shall be sent by Certified Mail Return Receipt Requested to Lara Mahaney, Director of Corporate and Entertainment Affairs, Parents Television Council, 325 South Patrick Street, Alexandria, VA 23114. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Marlene H. Dortch Secretary _________________________ 1 The Enforcement Bureau has referred this matter to the full Commission pursuant to Section 0.5(c) of the Rules. 47 C.F.R. 0.5(c)(2002). This Memorandum Opinion and Order denies a complaint the Commission received concerning broadcasts of this program. 2 See 18 U.S.C. 1464 (2002), and 47 C.F.R. 73.3999 (2002). 3 See Letter to David Solomon, Chief, Enforcement Bureau, from Lara Mahaney, Director of Corporate and Entertainment Affairs, Parents Television Council, dated August 22, 2003 (``Complaint''). The
  • http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2006/FCC-06-173A1.html
    • EMR-300 meters and Type 25 probes ("W&G Meters") and Narda Model 8718 meters and Model 8722 probes ("Narda Meters"). When conducting the on-off tests and individual station measurements on July 12, 2002, the agents used the W&G Meters exclusively. 19 FCC Rcd at 23931, n.63. The manufacturer-specified uncertainty factors for the W&G Meters and the Narda Meters extend from +/- 0.5 dB to +/- 3 dB, depending on various factors, including, for example, the magnitude of the measurement, the frequency response, the isotropic deviation and the measurement methodology. Telemundo also argues that no sanctions can be justified against KWHY because if a "measurement yields a 5, plus or minus 2, it is equally valid to argue that the `real' measurement is
  • http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2007/FCC-07-125A1.html
    • PR); WPEZ750 (Santurce, PR); WPFA265 (San Juan, PR); WPFA266 (Santurce, PR); WPFA268 (Santurce, PR); WPFA269 (Santurce, PR); WPFA270 (Santurce, PR); WPFA273 (Santurce, PR); WPFA278 (Santurce, PR); WPFA280 (Santurce, PR); WPFD607 (Santurce, PR); WPFD808 (Santurce, PR); WPFD809 (Santurce, PR); WPFD810 (Santurce, PR); WPFD811 (Santurce, PR); WPFD812 (Santurce, PR); WPFE472 (Santurce, PR); WPFE934 (Cayey, PR); WPFG589 (no ULS address; coordinates 18-16-08.8 N, 066-04-00.5 W); WPFG599 (Caguas, PR); WPFM597 (Cayey, PR); WPFM600 (San Juan, PR); WPFN354 (Aguada, PR); WPFN600 (Anasco, PR); WPFN636 (Anasco, PR); WPFN725 (Anasco, PR); WPFQ293 (Charlotte Amalie, VI); WPFS846 (Saint Croix, VI); WPFS856 (Saint Croix, VI); WPFT334 (Saint Croix, VI); WPFT335 (Saint Croix, VI); WPFT335 (Aguada, PR); WPFT356 (Aguada, PR); WPFT357 (Saint Croix, VI); WPFT369 (Charlotte Amalie, VI); WPFT416 (Charlotte Amalie,
  • http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2008/FCC-08-250A1.html
    • Requested, to Christian Voice of Central Ohio, Inc., c/o David J. Kaufman, Esq., Rini Coran, PC, 1615 L Street, N.W., Suite 1325, Washington, DC 20036. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Marlene H. Dortch Secretary See Christian Voice of Central Ohio, Petition for Reconsideration (filed June 9, 2008) ("Petition"). The Enforcement Bureau has referred this matter to the full Commission pursuant to Section 0.5(c) of the Rules. See 47 C.F.R. S: 0.5(c). See also 47 C.F.R. S: 1.106(a)(1). In April 2004, after the complaint initiating this matter had been filed, but before the Enforcement Bureau had inquired into the matter, Christian Voice sought to modify the Station's noncommercial educational license so that it could operate WCVZ(FM) as a commercial facility. See File No. BMLH-20040415AEI,
  • http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2011/DA-11-816A1.html
    • the occupational limit fence around the perimeter of this site with warning signs to enclose the area below occupational limits but above public exposure RFR limits. As such the occupational RFR limits apply inside the inner fence. Public limits apply outside the outer fence. The maximum RFR reading at the site was 0.89 milliwatts/cm2 along the north inner fence at 0.5 meters from the ground. Levels along the other inner fence borders ranged from 0.13 milliwatts/cm2 to 0.32 milliwatts/cm2. Additionally, one location outside the inner fence showed a reading of 0.79 milliwatts/cm2. This was 5 meters west northwest of the northwest corner of the fenced area at 0.5 meters from ground level. This was the highest level between the two fence
  • http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/otherinfo/fcc97218.html
    • of assessing reasonable forfeitures to ensure substantial compliance by licensees and therefore, the amounts should be reduced. In support, they noted that common carrier forfeitures issued before the statutory increase were seldom more than 25 percent of the maximum, and that forfeitures assessed after the statutory increase but before the implementation of the prior policy statement were no more than 0.5 percent of the new one million dollar maximum. Emery Comments, 11-12. NAB and MCI also agreed that the base amounts suggested in the proposed forfeiture guidelines were too high and should be reduced by 50 percent with the exception of tower safety violations. NAB Comments, 5; MCI Reply Comments, 3. 19. The legislative history of Section 503 of the Act
  • http://transition.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-2650A1.doc http://transition.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-2650A1.pdf
    • service; (2) second full-time aural service; (3) first local service; and (4) other public interest matters. Co-equal weight is given to priorities (2) and (3). If WWB's proposed reallotment is adopted, Rockmart will continue to be served by Station WZOT(AM), Rockmart, Georgia, and Channel 296C1 would provide a first local service at Aragon, Georgia. Station WTSH-FM currently provides service to 0.5 percent of the Atlanta, Georgia, Urbanized Area. That coverage would increase to 5.6 percent, if WWB's proposal is adopted. Faye and Richard Tuck, Memorandum Opinion and Order, 3 FCC Rcd 5374 (1988) (``Tuck''). In its comments, WWB supplies evidence demonstrating that Aragon has its own post office and zip code (30104); its own local government and elected officials; and numerous
  • http://transition.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/FCC-08-18A1.doc http://transition.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/FCC-08-18A1.pdf
    • Government Accountability Office. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Marlene H. Dortch Secretary Shiner, Texas, Report and Order, 19 FCC Rcd 4327 (MB 2004). Tilden, Texas, Report and Order, 19 FCC Rcd 6112 (MB 2004). Batesville, Texas, Notice of Proposed Rule Making, 16 FCC Rcd 12682 (MB 2001). The Media Bureau has referred this matter to the Commission pursuant to 47 C.F.R. § 0.5(c). Quanah, Texas, Notice of Proposed Rule Making, 15 FCC Rcd 15809 (MMB 2000). Section 1.420(d) of the Rules requires a counterproposal to be filed by the specified comment date in a rulemaking proceeding. 47 C.F.R. § 1.420(d). These Petitions for Rule Making were filed between April 18 and May 23, 2001. Benjamin and Mason, Texas, Memorandum Opinion and Order, 18
  • http://transition.fcc.gov/ftp/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Databases/documents_collection/76-101.html
    • our rules ( 73.52(b) ). Assume that, to maintain the relative phases within this tolerance, a monitoring accuracy of one-half this tolerance, or 1.5 degrees represents good engineering practice. The repeatability of the type approved monitor is 1 degree ( 73.53(c)(13)(ii) ). The permissible variation in samples presented to the monitor, caused by the temperature variations, should therefore not exceed 0.5 degree. Accordingly, we believe, a reasonable basis for determining the tolerable difference in the length of lines is to ascertain, considering the phase / temperature characteristic of the line employed, and the temperature variation to which the line would be subject on a diurnal and seasonal basis, that, as between the longest and shortest sampling lines proposed, a temperature phase
  • http://transition.fcc.gov/ib/sand/mniab/traffic/files09/CREPOR09.pdf
    • carrier Tota l Percent share by carrier Revenues 1 2 3 4 Other from PTT 1 2 3 4 Other from PTT 1 2 3 4 Other Minutes 1 2 3 4 Other Andorra $81,676 0.0 0.0 0.6 0.0 99.4 $293 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0100.0 $156 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0100.0 650,981 0.0 0.0 3.5 0.0 96.5 Austria $18,391,659 0.0 0.6 0.5 0.0 98.9 $1,055,789 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0100.0 $988,909 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0100.0 161,263,898 0.0 0.4 2.6 0.0 96.9 Belgium $21,804,980 0.0 0.0 0.7 0.0 99.3 $1,900,919 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0100.0 $33,511,557 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0100.0 408,649,548 0.0 0.0 0.3 0.0 99.7 Cyprus $1,553,422 0.0 0.0 1.7 0.0 98.3 $147,206 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0100.0 $271,599 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0100.0 31,929,612 0.0
  • http://transition.fcc.gov/ib/sand/mniab/traffic/files10/CREPOR10.pdf
    • $851,303 0.1 0.0 0.0 3.5 96.4 $74,883 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0100.0 $205,465 0.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 99.1 20,698,660 0.1 0.0 0.0 15.2 84.7 Denmark $5,515,297 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.5 98.5 $181,443 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0100.0 $2,670,627 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 99.9 73,044,063 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.7 97.3 Finland $3,490,402 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.8 99.2 $90,660 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0100.0 $101,448 0.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 99.5 46,549,425 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.1 98.9 France $38,487,031 0.0 0.0 0.5 0.9 98.6 $5,754,860 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0100.0 $14,597,191 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 99.9 931,389,310 0.0 0.0 0.5 0.7 98.7 Germany $62,835,185 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 99.9 $14,270,528 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0100.0 $56,909,136 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0100.0 1,982,130,073 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 99.9 Gibraltar $153,290 0.0
  • http://transition.fcc.gov/mb/audio/bickel/findvalues.html
    • log[10] ((mV/m) * 1000.) The factor of 1000 is used to convert millivolts per meter to microvolts per meter. CAPTION: Common FCC-Defined Equivalent dBu and mV/m Values dBu (dB above 1 microvolt per meter (uV)) mV/m (millivolts per meter electric field strength) 100 dBu 100 mV/m 80 dBu 10 mV/m 70 dBu 3.16 mV/m 60 dBu 1.0 mV/m 54 dBu 0.5 mV/m 40 dBu 0.1 mV/m 34 dBu 0.05 mV/m 28 dBu 0.025 mV/m Note: Higher field strength values are found closer to a transmitter site. For FM and TV field strengths and distances, use the [30]propagation curves program. Power kW (kilowatts) to / from dBk (dB kilowatts) Enter power in kilowatts or dBk: ______ (_) kW (_) dBk [BUTTON] Result:
  • http://transition.fcc.gov/ownership/materials/already-released/assymetric090002.pdf
    • benefits. Therestofthepaperisorganizedasfollows.First,weextendRaskovich's (2000)modelandshowthatundermoregeneralassumptionsanequilib- riumstillexists.Next,weshowthattheintroductionofasymmetricbar- gainingpowercanimprovethebuyingfirm'sbargainingposition(evenif thefirmispivotal).Wealsoshowthatinthepresenceofasymmetric bargainingpowerthe`curvaturetest'ofthevaluefunctioncanbeamis- leadingindicatoroftheeffectsofmergeronbargainingposition,i.e.,that thebargainingpositionofthemergedfirmcanimproveevenifthethe valuefunctionisconvex.Finally,wemakesomeconcludingremarks. NashEquilibriumwithBargainingPower Inthissection,weextendRaskovich's(2000)modeltoaccommodateasym- metricbargainingpower.Webeginbyconstructingthetransferprices facedbypivotalandnon-pivotalbuyersandthenshowthatanequilib- riumexistsunderconditionsmoregeneralthanRaskovich's. FollowingRaskovich(2000),weassumetheithbuyer'ssurplusisgiven byvi=(qi,q-i),whilethesupplier'sgrosssurplusequalsV(Q),where Q= ni=1qi.Specifically,V(Q)=A(Q)-C(Q),whereA(Q) ancillary revenue,andC(Q) totalcost.Thesupplierwillproduceiff: V(Q)+ n i=1 Ti 0 (1) 3ForRaskovich(2000), 1= 2= n=12.Infact,Raskovich'spivotalresultwillholdforanyconstantvalue = 1= 2=... nwhere (0,1).Notethat irepresentstheshareofsurpluskeptbybuyeri. 3 Wealsonotethat: q i=argmax x[vi(x,q-i)+V(Q-i+x)] (2) whereweassumethereexistsaq tthatmaximizesjointsurplus.4Buyeri ispivotaliff: V(Q-i)+ j =i Tj<0 (3) and max x[vi(x,q-i)+V(Q-i+x)]+ j =i Tj 0 (4) wherevi(0,q-i)=0.5 Thetransferprice(incorporatingasymmetricbargainingpowerand using notation)becomes,foranon-pivotalbuyer,Ti=(vi+(V-V-i))(1- i)-(V-V-i)whichcanbewrittenas: Ti=vi(1- i)- i(V-V-i) (5) Next,notingthat j =iTj+V-i<0,weseethatthetransferpricefora pivotalbuyercanbewrittenasTi=[vi+( j =iTj+V)](1- i)-V- j =iTj,oras: Ti=vi(1- i)- i( j =i Tj+V) (6) Definition1:ANashEquilibriuminpurchasedquantities(q 1,q 2,...,q n) andtransferprices(T1,...,Tn)isthatforwhichthefollowingholdsimul- taneouslyforalli: q i=argmax x(vi(x,q -i)+V( j =i q j+x)) (7) Ti=vi(x,q -i)(1- i)- i(V(Q )-V(Q -q i)) (8) if j =iTj+V(Q -q i) 0 Ti=vi(x,q -i)(1- i)- i( j =i Tj+V(Q
  • http://transition.fcc.gov/ownership/materials/already-released/review090001.pdf
    • the most weight, data from markets 99 and 101 get the next most weight, and so forth. The particular smoothing method employed is called "loess" and is described in William S. Cleveland, The Elements of Graphing Data (Hobart Press, 1994). The specific implementation is from the "loess" command in the statistical package "S-PLUS 2000", with the smoothing parameter set to 0.5. 12 For the current year, March 2001, the Metro market revenue is equated to the sum of the station revenue for stations assigned ("home") to their Metro market. In previous years, Metro market revenue was used. In some cases the differences between these measures of market revenue were the result of out-of-Metro market stations that earned a share of the
  • http://transition.fcc.gov/ownership/materials/already-released/survivor090002.pdf
    • Total Broadcast Advertising Volume Total Cable Advertising Volume National Video Advertising Volume Broadcast Network Advertising Volume National Spot Advertising Volume Syndicatio n Advertising Volume Cable Network Advertising Volume Local Video Advertising Volume Local Spot Advertising Volume Local Cable Advertising Volume 1975 100.0 100.0 0.0 74.7 43.8 30.8 0.0 0.0 25.3 25.3 0.0 1980 100.0 99.4 0.6 74.1 44.7 28.5 0.4 0.5 25.9 25.8 0.1 1985 100.0 95.4 4.6 72.2 37.9 28.2 2.4 3.7 27.8 26.8 0.9 1990 100.0 91.0 9.0 71.1 33.9 26.5 3.8 6.8 28.9 26.8 2.2 1991 100.0 89.0 11.0 71.0 33.3 24.9 4.4 8.4 29.0 26.4 2.6 1992 100.0 87.7 12.3 70.7 33.0 24.3 4.4 9.0 29.3 26.0 3.3 1993 100.0 86.3 13.7 70.5 31.4 24.0 4.9 10.1
  • http://transition.fcc.gov/ownership/roundtable_docs/waldfogel-b.pdf
    • residential segregation in the 15 Northern cities with the largest black populations in 1980 was 80.1 (Massey and Denton, 1993, p. 64). Alternatively, let = Min(sbj, swj)/Max(sbj, swj), where sbj is the percent of all black listeners listening to format j and similarly for whites. There are only two formats, News and Soft Adult Contemporary, for which is greater than 0.5. 19 Table 5 reports listening data, by format and age and gender.17 These data reveal substantial differences in preferences across age groups, both in formats, and number of formats, chosen. Teenaged (12-17) listening is heavily concentrated in three formats, top 40 (37.6 percent), Black (19.3 percent), and Album Oriented Rock (11.5 percent). Teenagers listen to 4.8 format equivalents, fewer than
  • http://transition.fcc.gov/ownership/roundtable_docs/waldfogel-c.pdf
    • 3.4 AC/Contemp. Hit Radio 2.1 2.9 0.8 2.3 2.9 1.5 Adult Contemp./New Rock 0.6 1.1 0.3 1.1 1.5 0.6 AC/Soft Adult Contemp. 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 Album Oriented Rock (AOR) 5.3 6.0 0.7 4.5 4.9 2.4 AOR/Adult Contemp. 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.0 AOR/Classic Rock 0.2 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 Album Oriented Rock/New Rock 3.0 3.7 0.5 3.1 3.3 1.9 Album Oriented Rock/Progressive 1.0 1.3 0.1 1.8 1.6 0.6 Black 7.5 1.7 32.5 1.6 4.0 1.6 Black/Adult Contemp. 3.2 0.8 18.3 1.4 4.6 1.7 Black/Gospel 1.2 0.0 1.8 0.1 0.0 0.0 Black/Oldies 1.0 0.1 2.4 0.3 0.5 0.0 Black/Talk 0.2 0.0 1.4 0.3 0.4 0.0 Big Band/Nostalgia 4.7 4.2 0.5 4.2 4.1 1.2 Big Band/Nostalgia/Religious 0.0 0.0
  • http://transition.fcc.gov/ownership/workshop-110209/wildman.pdf
    • news does not equate to offering local news 10 Number of local news items by medium 11 % allocation of local news items by type Type of news Daily NP Weekly NP TV Stns News Talk Radio StnsOther Radio Stations City gov't 24.0 20.6 16.4 19.4 19.4 County gov't 2.8 2.5 3.9 5.4 5.4 Reg. gov't 0.8 0.1 0.3 1.0 0.5 Education 7.8 10.7 4.5 5.4 4.3 Crime/Courts 23.2 8.2 31.1 28.1 26.3 Accidents/Disasters 5.6 1.0 11.6 9.7 11.8 Human/Community interest 16.3 41.3 12.7 14.0 11.3 Business/Economy 17.0 14.4 16.7 15.7 17.2 All else 2.6 1.1 2.7 1.3 3.8 Total 100 100 100 100 100 12 News Outlets vsOutlets with Local News TV Stations News Outlets vsOutlets with Local News Radio
  • http://transition.fcc.gov/realaudio/presentations/2003/021203/featuredetection.pdf
    • power spectral density are deterministic functions that (incompletely) describe a stochastic process Ë There exists an infinite number of stochastic processes that have the same correlation function and power spectral density Delay Frequency F Correlation Function Power Spectral Density 11 ©2003 The MITRE Corporation Second-Order Moments for Zero-Mean Wide-Sense Stationary Process (Concluded) 0 1 2 3 4 x 10-6 -1 -0.5 0 0.5 6 x 105 time Cyclic ACF tau Time Delay Spectral Frequency Correlation Function Power Spectral Density 12 ©2003 The MITRE Corporation Cyclostationary Processes I Model of actual data as stationary becomes limited as statistics vary over time I Statistics of some time series vary periodically over time- cyclostationary processes I First-order and second-order moments of cyclostationary processes Ë
  • http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/05/releases/fc980046.pdf http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/05/releases/fc980046.txt http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/05/releases/fc980046.wp
    • 1996); RFW Petition at 1, 4-5 (recommending a five-year deferral of principal and interest payments); Urban Communicators Petition at ii, 2, 5-7 (asking for an extension of the suspension until March 31, 1999, and two additional one- year deferrals, so long as licensees make certain demonstrations of financial ability and substantial construction progress and pay an interest rate increased by 0.5 percent for the deferral period); CONXUS Opposition at 6 (agreeing with NextWave and Alpine); Duluth PCS, et al. Opposition at 5 (advocating a five-year deferral of payment obligations); and Polycell Opposition at 5 (same as Duluth PCS, et al.). See also The Honorable Barbara Boxer ex parte filing at 1 (asking the Commission to consider a "limited deferral"); The Honorable
  • http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/11/releases/bip_def.pdf
    • at the terminals of each microwave receiver from all of the applicant's current and proposed PCS operations. 110 Table 2: Coordination Distances in Kilometers [PCS Base Station Antenna HAAT in Meters] eirp. (W) 5 10 20 50 100 150 200 250 300 500 1000 1500 2000 0.1 90 93 99 110 122 131 139 146 152 173 210 239 263 0.5 96 100 105 116 128 137 145 152 158 179 216 245 269 1 99 103 108 119 131 140 148 155 161 182 219 248 272 2 120 122 126 133 142 148 154 159 164 184 222 250 274 5 154 157 161 168 177 183 189 194 198 213 241 263 282 10 180 183 187 194
  • http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/14/releases/fo9750.pdf http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/14/releases/fo9750.txt http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/14/releases/fo9750.wp
    • in the WCS transmitters and the establishment of guardbands, on the order of 100 to 150 kHz, on the WCS spectrum immediately adjacent to the edges of the 2320-2345 MHz band. In addition, Primosphere requests that WCS transmissions be required 309 to be circularly polarized in the opposite sense to satellite DARS transmissions, that WCS mobile units be limited to 0.5 watts, and that fixed transmitters be limited to 100 watts. 310 130. In addition, AFTRCC -- the non-Government advisory committee for coordination of the flight test frequencies in the 2310-2390 MHz band -- states that the out-of-band emission limits proposed in the NPRM are insufficient to protect flight test operations in the 2320-2345 and 2360-2390 MHz bands from WCS operations.
  • http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/16/releases/da971934.pdf http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/16/releases/da971934.txt http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/16/releases/da971934.wp
    • current bidding period plus one minus the weighting factor times the activity index from the previous round. The activity index is then 3 used to calculate a percentage increment by multiplying a minimum percentage increment by one plus the activity index with that result being subject to a maximum percentage increment. The Commission will initially set the weighting factor at 0.5, the minimum percentage increment at 0.05, and the maximum percentage increment at 0.15. The mathematical formulas can be found in the Equations section, following. B. Equations A = (C * B) + ( (1-C) * A) i i i-1 I = smaller of ( (1 + A) * N) and M i i where, A = activity index for the
  • http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/17/releases/lmdsbp_b.pdf
    • current bidding period plus one minus the weighting factor times the activity index from the previous round. The activity index is then used to calculate a percentage increment by multiplying a minimum percentage increment by one plus the activity index with that result being subject to a maximum percentage increment. The 107 Commission will initially set the weighting factor at 0.5, the minimum percentage increment at 0.05, and the maximum percentage increment at 0.15. The mathematical formulas follow. (a) Equations A = (C * B) + ( (1-C) * A) i i i-1 I = smaller of ( (1 + A) * N) and M i i where, A = activity index for the current round (round i) i C =
  • http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/18/releases/220_b.pdf
    • the current bidding round plus one minus the weighting factor times the activity index from the previous round. The activity index is then used to calculate a percentage increment by multiplying a minimum percentage increment by one plus the activity index with that result being subject to a maximum percentage increment. The Commission will initially set the weighting factor at 0.5, the minimum percentage increment at 0.05, and the maximum percentage increment at 0.15. Equations A = (C * B) + ( (1-C) * A) i i i-1 I = smaller of ( (1 + A) * N) and M i i where, A = activity index for the current round (round i) i C = activity weight factor B =
  • http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/18/releases/220_e.pdf
    • 90.715(b) will be geographically separated from those Phase I base or fixed station transmitters utilizing 220-221 MHz frequencies removed 200 kHz or less and assigned from Sub-band B as follows: Geographic Separation of Sub-Band A; Base or Fixed Station Receivers and Sub-Band B; Base or Fixed Station Transmitters Effective Radiated Separation power distance (watts) (kilometers) /1/ 0.0-0.3 (/2/) 0.3-0.5 5 0.5-0.6 10 0.6-0.8 20 0.8-2.0 25 2.0-4.0 50 4.0-5.0 100 5.0-6.0 200 Over 6.0 500 /1/ Transmitter peak envelope power shall be used to determine effective radiated power. /2/ Stations separated by 0.3 km or less shall not be authorized. This table does not apply to the low-power channels 196-200. See Section 90.729(c). (e) Phase II licensees authorized on 220-221 MHz
  • http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/18/releases/da980048.pdf http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/18/releases/da980048.txt http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/18/releases/da980048.wp
    • the current bidding period plus one minus the weighting factor times the activity index from the previous round. The activity index is then used to calculate a percentage increment by multiplying a minimum percentage increment by one plus the activity index with that result being subject to a maximum percentage increment. The Commission will initially set the weighting factor at 0.5, the minimum percentage increment at 0.05, and the maximum percentage increment at 0.15. Equations A = (C * B) + ( (1-C) * A) i i i-1 I = smaller of ( (1 + A) * N) and M i i where, A = activity index for the current round (round i) i C = activity weight factor 6 B
  • http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/18/releases/da981010.pdf http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/18/releases/da981010.txt http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/18/releases/da981010.wp
    • the current bidding round plus one minus the weighting factor times the activity index from the previous round. The activity index is then used to calculate a percentage increment by multiplying a minimum percentage increment by one plus the activity index with that result being subject to a maximum percentage increment. The Commission will initially set the weighting factor at 0.5, the minimum percentage increment at 0.05, and the maximum percentage increment at 0.15. 30 Equations A = (C * B) + ( (1-C) * A) i i i-1 I = smaller of ( (1 + A) * N) and M i i where, A = activity index for the current round (round i) i C = activity weight factor B
  • http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/18/releases/fc970057.pdf http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/18/releases/fc970057.txt http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/18/releases/fc970057.wp
    • those Phase I base or fixed station transmitters utilizing 220-221 MHz frequencies removed 200 kHz or less and assigned from Sub-band B as follows: Federal Communications Commission FCC 97-57 PAGE B-14 Geographic Separation of Sub-Band A Base or Fixed Station Receivers and Sub-Band B Base or Fixed Station Transmitters Effective Separation radiated distance power (kilometers) (watts)/1/ 0.0-0.3 (/2/) 0.3-0.5 5 0.5-0.6 10 0.6-0.8 20 0.8-2.0 25 2.0-4.0 50 4.0-5.0 100 5.0-6.0 200 Over 6.0 500 /1/ Transmitter peak envelope power shall be used to determine effective radiated power. /2/ Stations separated by 0.3 km or less shall not be authorized. This table does not apply to the low-power channels 196-200. See Section 90.729(c). (e) Phase II licensees authorized on 220-221 MHz
  • http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/20/releases/da981469.pdf http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/20/releases/da981469.txt http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/20/releases/da981469.wp
    • current bidding period plus one minus the weighting factor times the activity index from the previous round. The activity index is then used 6 to calculate a percentage increment by multiplying a minimum percentage increment by one plus the activity index with that result being subject to a maximum percentage increment. The Commission will initially set the weighting factor at 0.5, the minimum percentage increment at 0.1, and the maximum percentage increment at 0.2. Equations A = (C * B) + ( (1-C) * A) i i i-1 I = smaller of ( (1 + A) * N) and M i i where, A = activity index for the current round (round i) i C = activity weight factor B =
  • http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/20/releases/da981796.pdf http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/20/releases/da981796.txt http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/20/releases/da981796.wp
    • current bidding period plus one minus the weighting factor times the activity index from the previous round. The activity index is then used to calculate a percentage increment by multiplying a minimum percentage increment by one plus the activity index with that result being subject to a maximum percentage increment. The 25 Commission will initially set the weighting factor at 0.5, the minimum percentage increment at 0.1, and the maximum percentage increment at 0.2. Equations A = (C * B) + ( (1-C) * A) i i i-1 I = smaller of ( (1 + A) * N) and M i i where, A = activity index for the current round (round i) i C = activity weight factor B =
  • http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/20/releases/f970217a.pdf http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/20/releases/f970217a.txt http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/20/releases/f970217a.wp
    • in accordance with § 80.225. This requirement does not apply to transmitters used with AMTS or hand-held portable transmitters. 15. In Section 80.205, the table in paragraph (a) is amended by modifying the second "J2B" entry to read as follows: § 80.205 Bandwidths. (a) * * * Classes of emission Emission Authorized designator bandwidth (kHz) * * * J2B................ 300HJ2B 0.5 5 * * * * * NB-DP radiotelegraph and data transmissions for communications with public coast stations. 5 * * * * * 16. In Section 80.207, paragraph (a) is revised, paragraphs (a)(1)-(4) are deleted and the table listed in paragraph (d) is amended by revising footnote 1, footnote 2 and adding footnote 13 to read as follows: § 80.207
  • http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/21/releases/da981616.pdf http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/21/releases/da981616.txt http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/21/releases/da981616.wp
    • the current bidding period plus one minus the weighting factor times the activity index from the previous round. The activity index is then used to calculate a percentage increment by multiplying a minimum percentage increment by one plus the activity index with that result being subject to a maximum percentage increment. The Commission will initially set the weighting factor at 0.5, the minimum percentage increment at 0.1, and the maximum percentage increment at 0.2. Equations A = (C * B) + ( (1-C) * A) i i i-1 I = smaller of ( (1 + A) * N) and M i i where, A = activity index for the current round (round i) i C = activity weight factor B =
  • http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/21/releases/da981879.pdf http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/21/releases/da981879.txt http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/21/releases/da981879.wp
    • shift from the 0.05 to 0.15 increment range to the 0.10 to 0.20 increment range. Our proposal for the LMS auction follows this precedent. In addition, that increment addresses Comtrak's concern regarding the pace of the auction. We further believe that our proposal will result in reasonable prices for LMS spectrum. Accordingly, we will initially set the weighting factor at 0.5, the minimum percentage increment at 0.1, and the maximum percentage increment at 0.2. Equations A = (C * B) + ( (1-C) * A) i i i-1 I = smaller of ( (1 + A) * N) and M i i where, A = activity index for the current round (round i) i C = activity weight factor B =
  • http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/21/releases/da982394.pdf http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/21/releases/da982394.txt http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/21/releases/da982394.wp
    • pollution monitoring, wind field analyses and forecasts of toxic plumes trajectories resulting from chemical or nuclear incidents, severe weather warnings for aviation, meteorological observations, airport operations and public protection. Operating Characteristics The operating characteristics listed below in Table 1-6 are typical for wind profilers operating in the 902-928 MHz band. TABLE 1-6 UHF Wind Profiler Radar Operating Characteristics Peak Power 0.5 kW Frequency Range 915-924 MHz (Fixed Crystal) Pulse Width 0.7Fs- 2.8 Fs Pulse Repetition Frequency 20 KPPS Antenna Gain 25 dBi Sensitivity -102 dBm Antenna Polarization Linear Bandwidth 10 MHz NOTE: Some systems have up to 5kW Peak Power and Necessary Bandwidth range from 3-13 MHz 11 Operating Areas The UHF Wind Proflier Radars will be deployed on and in
  • http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/21/releases/lmsbp_d.pdf
    • the current bidding round plus one minus the weighting factor times the activity index from the previous round. The activity index is then used to calculate a percentage increment by multiplying a minimum percentage increment by one plus the activity index with that result being subject to a maximum percentage increment. The Commission will initially set the weighting factor at 0.5, the minimum percentage increment at 0.1, and the maximum percentage increment at 0.2. Equations Ai = (C * Bi) + ( (1-C) * Ai-1) Ii = smaller of ( (1 + Ai) * N) and M where, Ai = activity index for the current round (round i) C = activity weight factor Bi = number of bids in the current
  • http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/22/releases/pcsbipd.pdf
    • the current bidding round plus one minus the weighting factor times the activity index from the previous round. The activity index is then used to calculate a percentage increment by multiplying a minimum percentage increment by one plus the activity index with that result being subject to a maximum percentage increment. The Commission will initially set the weighting factor at 0.5, the minimum percentage increment at 0.1, and the maximum percentage increment at 0.2. Equations Ai = (C * Bi) + ( (1-C) * Ai-1) Ii+1 = smaller of ( (1 + Ai) * N) and M where, Ai = activity index for the current round (round i) C = activity weight factor Bi = number of bids in the current
  • http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/22/releases/pcsbipg.pdf
    • 1996); RFW Petition at 1, 4-5 (recommending a five-year deferral of principal and interest payments); Urban Communicators Petition at ii, 2, 5-7 (asking for an extension of the suspension until March 31, 1999, and two additional one- year deferrals, so long as licensees make certain demonstrations of financial ability and substantial construction progress and pay an interest rate increased by 0.5 percent for the deferral period); CONXUS Opposition at 6 (agreeing with NextWave and Alpine); Duluth PCS, et al. Opposition at 5 (advocating a five-year deferral of payment obligations); and Polycell Opposition at 5 (same as Duluth PCS, et al.). See also The Honorable Barbara Boxer ex parte filing at 1 (asking the Commission to consider a "limited deferral"); The Honorable
  • http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/23/releases/da990266.pdf http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/23/releases/da990266.txt http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/23/releases/da990266.wp
    • most recent bidding round plus one minus the weighting factor times the activity index from the prior round. The activity index is then used to calculate a percentage increment by multiplying a minimum percentage increment by one plus the activity index with that result being subject to a maximum percentage increment. The Commission will initially set the weighting factor at 0.5, the minimum percentage increment at 0.1, and the maximum percentage increment at 0.2. Equations A = (C * B) + ( (1-C) * A) i i i-1 I = smaller of ( (1 + A) * N) and M i+1 i where, A = activity index for the current round (round i) i C = activity weight factor B =
  • http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/24/releases/da990474.pdf http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/24/releases/da990474.txt http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/24/releases/da990474.wp
    • most recent bidding round plus one minus the weighting factor times the activity index from the prior round. The activity index is then used to calculate a percentage increment by multiplying a minimum percentage increment by one plus the activity index with that result being subject to a maximum percentage increment. The Commission will initially set the weighting factor at 0.5, the minimum percentage increment at 0.1, and the maximum percentage increment at 0.2. Equations A = (C * B) + ( (1-C) * A) i i i-1 24 I = smaller of ( (1 + A) * N) and M i+1 i where, A = activity index for the current round (round i) i C = activity weight factor B
  • http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/24/releases/pt1_pt90.pdf http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/24/releases/pt1_pt90.wp
    • from those Phase I base or fixed station transmitters utilizing 220- 221 MHz frequencies removed 200 kHz or less and assigned from Sub-band B as follows: Geographic Separation of Sub-Band A; Base or Fixed Station Receiversand Sub-Band B; Base or Fixed Station Transmitters Effective ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Separation distance (kilometers) Radiated power (watts) [FN1] ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 0.0-0.3 .................................................................... ( [FN2]) 0.3-0.5 .................................................................... 5 0.5-0.6 .................................................................... 10 0.6-0.8 .................................................................... 20 0.8-2.0 .................................................................... 25 2.0-4.0 .................................................................... 50 4.0-5.0 .................................................................... 100 5.0-6.0 .................................................................... 200 Over 6.0 ................................................................. 500 FN1 Transmitter peak envelope power shall be used to determine effective radiated power. FN2 Stations separated by 0.3 km or less shall not be authorized. This table does not apply to the low-power channels 196-200. See § 90.729(c). (e)
  • http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/24/releases/pt1_pt90.pdf http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/24/releases/pt1_pt90.wp
    • degrees 27' 52.8"......66 degrees 06' 58.6" Little Rock-North Little Rock, Arkansas.....34 degrees 44' 42.3"......92 degrees 16' 37.5" Las Vegas, Nevada..................36 degrees 10' 19.9"......115 degrees 08' 40.0" Columbia, South Carolina..............34 degrees 00' 02.6"......81 degrees 01' 59.3" Fort Wayne, Indiana..................41 degrees 04' 21.2"......85 degrees 08' 25.9" Bakersfield, California................35 degrees 22' 30.9"......119 degrees 01' 19.4" Davenport-Rock Island-Moline, IA/IL......41 degrees 31' 00.1"......90 degrees 35' 00.5" Shreveport, Louisiana.................32 degrees 30' 46.5"......93 degrees 44' 58.6" Des Moines, Iowa...................41 degrees 35' 14.0"......93 degrees 37' 00.8" Peoria, Illinois.....................40 degrees 41' 42.1"......89 degrees 35' 33.4" Newport News-Hampton, Virginia.........36 degrees 59' 30.5"......76 degrees 25' 58.8" Jackson, Mississippi..................32 degrees 17' 56.5"......90 degrees 11' 06.3" Augusta, Georgia/South Carolina.........33 degrees 28' 20.5"......81 degrees 57' 59.4" Spokane, Washington.................47 degrees 39' 31.6"......117 degrees 25' 36.8" Corpus
  • http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/25/releases/fc980194.pdf http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/25/releases/fc980194.txt http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/25/releases/fc980194.wp
    • Each eligible daytime-only station in the foregoing categories will receive an Order to Show Cause why its license should not be modified to specify operation during nighttime hours with the facilities it is licensed to start using at local sunrise, using the power stated in the Order to Show Cause, that the Commission finds is the highest nighttime level--not exceeding 0.5 kW--at which the station could operate without causing prohibited interference to other domestic or foreign stations, or to co-channel or adjacent channel stations for which pending applications were filed before December 1, 1987. (ii) Stations accepting such modification shall be reclassified. Those authorized in such Show Cause Orders to operate during nighttime hours with a power of 0.25 kW or
  • http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/26/releases/d991591c.doc http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/26/releases/d991591c.txt
    • in the following round will be the new high bid plus the dollar amount associated with the percentage increment (variable Ii+1 from above times the high bid). This result will be rounded to the nearest thousand if the minimum acceptable bid is over ten thousand dollars or to the nearest hundred if it is under ten thousand dollars. License 1 C=0.5, N = 0.1, M = 0.2 Round 1 (2 new bids, high bid = $1,000,000) 1. Calculation of percentage increment for round 2 using exponential smoothing: A1 = (0.5 * 2) + (0.5 * 0) = 1 The smaller of I2 = (1 + 1) * 0.1 = 0.2 or 0.2 (the maximum percentage increment) 2. Minimum bid increment for
  • http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/26/releases/da991103.doc http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/26/releases/da991103.pdf http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/26/releases/da991103.txt
    • most recent bidding round plus one minus the weighting factor times the activity index from the prior round. The activity index is then used to calculate a percentage increment by multiplying a minimum percentage increment by one plus the activity index with that result being subject to a maximum percentage increment. The Commission will initially set the weighting factor at 0.5, the minimum percentage increment at 0.1, and the maximum percentage increment at 0.2. Equations Ai = (C * Bi) + ( (1-C) * Ai-1) Ii+1 = smaller of ( (1 + Ai) * N) and M where, Ai = activity index for the current round (round i) C = activity weight factor Bi = number of bids in the current
  • http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/26/releases/pagebp_d.pdf
    • the current bidding round plus one minus the weighting factor times the activity index from the previous round. The activity index is then used to calculate a percentage increment by multiplying a minimum percentage increment by one plus the activity index with that result being subject to a maximum percentage increment. The Commission will initially set the weighting factor at 0.5, the minimum percentage increment at 0.1 and the maximum percentage increment at 0.2 The Bureau retains the discretion to change the minimum bid increment if it determines that circumstances so dictate, such as raising the minimum increment toward the end of the auction to enable bids to reach their final values more quickly. The Bureau will do so by announcement
  • http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/28/releases/fc980194.pdf http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/28/releases/fc980194.txt http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/28/releases/fc980194.wp
    • Each eligible daytime-only station in the foregoing categories will receive an Order to Show Cause why its license should not be modified to specify operation during nighttime hours with the facilities it is licensed to start using at local sunrise, using the power stated in the Order to Show Cause, that the Commission finds is the highest nighttime level--not exceeding 0.5 kW--at which the station could operate without causing prohibited interference to other domestic or foreign stations, or to co-channel or adjacent channel stations for which pending applications were filed before December 1, 1987. (ii) Stations accepting such modification shall be reclassified. Those authorized in such Show Cause Orders to operate during nighttime hours with a power of 0.25 kW or
  • http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/30/releases/da000112.doc http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/30/releases/da000112.pdf http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/30/releases/da000112.txt
    • most recent bidding round plus one minus the weighting factor times the activity index from the prior round. The activity index is then used to calculate a percentage increment by multiplying a minimum percentage increment by one plus the activity index with that result being subject to a maximum percentage increment. The Commission will initially set the weighting factor at 0.5, the minimum percentage increment at 0.1, and the maximum percentage increment at 0.2. (See example below.) Ai = (C * Bi) + ( (1-C) * Ai-1) Ii+1 = smaller of ( (1 + Ai) * N) and M where, Ai = activity index for the current round (round i) C = activity weight factor Bi = number of bids in
  • http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/30/releases/da992624.doc http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/30/releases/da992624.pdf http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/30/releases/da992624.txt
    • most recent bidding round plus one minus the weighting factor times the activity index from the prior round. The activity index is then used to calculate a percentage increment by multiplying a minimum percentage increment by one plus the activity index with that result being subject to a maximum percentage increment. The Commission will initially set the weighting factor at 0.5, the minimum percentage increment at 0.1, and the maximum percentage increment at 0.2. Equations Ai = (C * Bi) + ( (1-C) * Ai-1) Ii+1 = smaller of ( (1 + Ai) * N) and M where, Ai = activity index for the current round (round i) C = activity weight factor Bi = number of bids in the current
  • http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/31/releases/da000043.doc http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/31/releases/da000043.pdf http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/31/releases/da000043.txt
    • most recent bidding round plus one minus the weighting factor times the activity index from the prior round. The activity index is then used to calculate a percentage increment by multiplying a minimum percentage increment by one plus the activity index with that result being subject to a maximum percentage increment. The Commission will initially set the weighting factor at 0.5, the minimum percentage increment at 0.1, and the maximum percentage increment at 0.2. Equations Ai = (C * Bi) + ( (1-C) * Ai-1) Ii+1 = smaller of ( (1 + Ai) * N) and M where, Ai = activity index for the current round (round i) C = activity weight factor Bi = number of bids in the current
  • http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/31/releases/da000292.doc http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/31/releases/da000292.pdf http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/31/releases/da000292.txt
    • most recent bidding round plus one minus the weighting factor times the activity index from the prior round. The activity index is then used to calculate a percentage increment by multiplying a minimum percentage increment by one plus the activity index with that result being subject to a maximum percentage increment. The Commission will initially set the weighting factor at 0.5, the minimum percentage increment at 0.1, and the maximum percentage increment at 0.2. (See example below.) Ai = (C * Bi) + ( (1-C) * Ai-1) Ii+1 = smaller of ( (1 + Ai) * N) and M where, Ai = activity index for the current round (round i) C = activity weight factor Bi = number of bids in
  • http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/31/releases/da020260-policechiefs.pdf
    • 1000 10000 100000 Feet Los s (d B) Loss (dB) less antenna gain 1 Mile 2 Miles 4 Miles 1/2 Mile Figure 5, Free Space Loss Sum of two equal powers at the midpoint between them for a power loss slope of a given value (dB) 0 3 6 9 12 15 18 21 24 0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1 Location as % of Distance Tota l pow er f rom bo th, r ela tive to on e a t th e mid r ang e (d B) Sum (dB) 20 dB/decade Figure 6, Power variations as a function of separation Differences between Public Safety and CMRS requirements Public Safety requirements are dramatically different
  • http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/32/releases/da002416.doc http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/32/releases/da002416.pdf http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/32/releases/da002416.txt
    • is required. In order to evaluate the Section 307(b) considerations, the staff requires submission of additional information. Specifically, where the mutually exclusive group consists of proposals to serve different communities, each applicant within the group must submit by December 29, 2000, an amendment containing supplemental information including the following: (1) the area and population within the proposed 2 mV/m and 0.5 mV/m contours; (2) the number of stations licensed to the proposed community of license; (3) the number of stations providing protected service to the proposed community of license; (4) the population (according to the latest Census data) of the proposed community of license; (5) a description of the civic, cultural, religious, social and commercial attributes of the proposed community of
  • http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/33/releases/da000559.doc http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/33/releases/da000559.pdf http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/33/releases/da000559.txt
    • most recent bidding round plus one minus the weighting factor times the activity index from the prior round. The activity index is then used to calculate a percentage increment by multiplying a minimum percentage increment by one plus the activity index with that result being subject to a maximum percentage increment. The Commission will initially set the weighting factor at 0.5, the minimum percentage increment at 0.1, and the maximum percentage increment at 0.2. Equations Ai = (C * Bi) + ( (1-C) * Ai-1) Ii+1 = smaller of ( (1 + Ai) * N) and M where, Ai = activity index for the current round (round i) C = activity weight factor Bi = number of bids in the current
  • http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/33/releases/da000781.doc http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/33/releases/da000781.pdf http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/33/releases/da000781.txt
    • most recent bidding round plus one minus the weighting factor times the activity index from the prior round. The activity index is then used to calculate a percentage increment by multiplying a minimum percentage increment by one plus the activity index with that result being subject to a maximum percentage increment. The Commission will initially set the weighting factor at 0.5, the minimum percentage increment at 0.1, and the maximum percentage increment at 0.2. (See example below.) Ai = (C * Bi) + ( (1-C) * Ai-1) Ii+1 = smaller of ( (1 + Ai) * N) and M where, Ai = activity index for the current round (round i) C = activity weight factor Bi = number of bids in
  • http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/34/releases/da000667.doc http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/34/releases/da000667.pdf http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/34/releases/da000667.txt
    • most recent bidding round plus one minus the weighting factor times the activity index from the prior round. The activity index is then used to calculate a percentage increment by multiplying a minimum percentage increment by one plus the activity index with that result being subject to a maximum percentage increment. The Commission will initially set the weighting factor at 0.5, the minimum percentage increment at 0.1, and the maximum percentage increment at 0.2. Equations Ai = (C * Bi) + ( (1-C) * Ai-1) Ii+1 = smaller of ( (1 + Ai) * N) and M where, Ai = activity index for the current round (round i) C = activity weight factor Bi = number of bids in the current
  • http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/34/releases/da001100.doc http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/34/releases/da001100.pdf http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/34/releases/da001100.txt
    • most recent bidding round plus one minus the weighting factor times the activity index from the prior round. The activity index is then used to calculate a percentage increment by multiplying a minimum percentage increment by one plus the activity index with that result being subject to a maximum percentage increment. The Commission will initially set the weighting factor at 0.5, the minimum percentage increment at 0.1, and the maximum percentage increment at 0.2. (See example below.) Ai = (C * Bi) + ( (1-C) * Ai-1) Ii+1 = smaller of ( (1 + Ai) * N) and M where, Ai = activity index for the current round (round i) C = activity weight factor Bi = number of bids in
  • http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/35/releases/da000504.doc http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/35/releases/da000504.pdf http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/35/releases/da000504.txt
    • most recent bidding round plus one minus the weighting factor times the activity index from the prior round. The activity index is then used to calculate a percentage increment by multiplying a minimum percentage increment by one plus the activity index with that result being subject to a maximum percentage increment. The Commission will initially set the weighting factor at 0.5, the minimum percentage increment at 0.1, and the maximum percentage increment at 0.2. Equations Ai = (C * Bi) + (1-C) * Ai-1) Ii+1 = smaller of ( (1 + Ai) * N) and M where, Ai = activity index for the current round (round i) C = activity weight factor Bi = number of bids in the current round
  • http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/35/releases/da002038.doc http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/35/releases/da002038.pdf http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/35/releases/da002038.txt
    • most recent bidding round plus one minus the weighting factor times the activity index from the prior round. The activity index is then used to calculate a percentage increment by multiplying a minimum percentage increment by one plus the activity index with that result being subject to a maximum percentage increment. The Commission will initially set the weighting factor at 0.5, the minimum percentage increment at 0.1 (10%), and the maximum percentage increment at 0.2 (20%). Equations Ai = (C * Bi) + (1-C) * Ai-1) Ii+1 = smaller of ( (1 + Ai) * N) and M where, Ai = activity index for the current round (round i) C = activity weight factor Bi = number of bids in the
  • http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/35/releases/da002259.doc http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/35/releases/da002259.pdf http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/35/releases/da002259.txt
    • most recent bidding round plus one minus the weighting factor times the activity index from the prior round. The activity index is then used to calculate a percentage increment by multiplying a minimum percentage increment by one plus the activity index with that result being subject to a maximum percentage increment. The Commission will initially set the weighting factor at 0.5, the minimum percentage increment at 0.1, and the maximum percentage increment at 0.2. (See example below.) Ai = (C * Bi) + ( (1-C) * Ai-1) Ii+1 = smaller of ( (1 + Ai) * N) and M where, Ai = activity index for the current round (round i) C = activity weight factor Bi = number of bids in
  • http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/36/releases/da000668.doc http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/36/releases/da000668.pdf http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/36/releases/da000668.txt
    • most recent bidding round plus one minus the weighting factor times the activity index from the prior round. The activity index is then used to calculate a percentage increment by multiplying a minimum percentage increment by one plus the activity index with that result being subject to a maximum percentage increment. The Commission will initially set the weighting factor at 0.5, the minimum percentage increment at 0.1, and the maximum percentage increment at 0.2. Equations Ai = (C * Bi) + ( (1-C) * Ai-1) Ii+1 = smaller of ( (1 + Ai) * N) and M where, Ai = activity index for the current round (round i) C = activity weight factor Bi = number of bids in the current
  • http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/36/releases/da001388.doc http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/36/releases/da001388.pdf http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/36/releases/da001388.txt
    • most recent bidding round plus one minus the weighting factor times the activity index from the prior round. The activity index is then used to calculate a percentage increment by multiplying a minimum percentage increment by one plus the activity index with that result being subject to a maximum percentage increment. The Commission will initially set the weighting factor at 0.5, the minimum percentage increment at 0.1, and the maximum percentage increment at 0.2. (See example below.) Ai = (C * Bi) + ( (1-C) * Ai-1) Ii+1 = smaller of ( (1 + Ai) * N) and M where, Ai = activity index for the current round (round i) C = activity weight factor Bi = number of bids in
  • http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/39/releases/da010746.doc http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/39/releases/da010746.pdf http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/39/releases/da010746.txt
    • value based on the bidding activity on that license. This methodology allows the increments to be tailored to the activity level of a license, decreasing the time it takes for active licenses to reach their final value. The formula used to calculate this increment is included as Attachment G. We adopt our proposal of initially setting the weighing factor at 0.5, the minimum percentage increment at 0.1 (10 percent of the license value), and the maximum at 0.2 (20 percent of the license value). The Bureau retains the discretion to change the minimum bid increment if it determines that circumstance so dictate. The Bureau will do so by announcement in the Automated Auction System. Under its discretion, the Bureau may also
  • http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/40/releases/d012073a.pdf
    • Name Call SignFrequency City State Private Carrier Paging, 929-930 MHz GS 25-0-26.5-N 80-31-14.2-W N/A WAV ABC PAGING INC KNNQ624 929.4625TAVERNIER FL Private Carrier Paging, 929-930 MHz GS 24-48-47.5-N 80-49-34.2-W N/A WAV ABC PAGING INC KNNQ624 929.4625LONG KEY FL Private Carrier Paging, 929-930 MHz GS 24-41-29.5-N 81-6-2.3-W N/A WAV ABC PAGING INC KNNQ624 929.4625MARATHON FL Private Carrier Paging, 929-930 MHz GS 24-41-0.5-N 81-29-29.3-W N/A WAV ABC PAGING INC KNNQ624 929.4625CUDJOE KEY FL Private Carrier Paging, 929-930 MHz GS 24-33-19.5-N 81-48-6.3-W N/A WAV ABC PAGING INC KNNQ624 929.4625KEY WEST FL Private Carrier Paging, 929-930 MHz GS 36-31-36.4-N 82-35-13.5-W N/A PFR PAGER ONE INC KNNR909 929.1125KINGSPORT TN Private Carrier Paging, 929-930 MHz GS 36-8-6.3-N 83-43-28.7-W N/A PFR PAGER ONE INC KNNR909 929.1125KNOXVILLE TN Private
  • http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/41/releases/da011592.doc http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/41/releases/da011592.pdf http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/41/releases/da011592.txt
    • value based on the bidding activity on that license. This methodology allows the increments to be tailored to the activity level of a license, decreasing the time it takes for active licenses to reach their final value. The formula used to calculate this increment is included as Attachment G. We adopt our proposal of initially setting the weighing factor at 0.5, the minimum percentage increment at 0.1 (10 percent of the license value), and the maximum at 0.2 (20 percent of the license value). The Bureau retains the discretion to change the minimum acceptable bids and bid increments if it determines that circumstance so dictate. The Bureau will do so by announcement in the Automated Auction System. Under its discretion, the
  • http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/43/releases/da012315.pdf http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/43/releases/da012315.txt
    • be tailored to the activity level of a license, 79 Auction 43 Comment Public Notice at 6-7. 80 Id. at 7-9. 81 Id. 32 decreasing the time it takes for active licenses to reach their final value. The formula used to calculate this increment is included as Attachment G. We adopt our proposal of initially setting the weighing factor at 0.5, the minimum percentage increment at 0.1 (10 percent), and the maximum at 0.2 (20 percent). The Bureau retains the discretion to change the minimum acceptable bids and bid increments if it determines that circumstance so dictate. The Bureau will do so by announcement in the Automated Auction System. Under its discretion, the Bureau may also implement an absolute dollar floor
  • http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/44/releases/da020200.pdf http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/44/releases/da020200.txt
    • most recent bidding round plus one minus the weighting factor times the activity index from the prior round. The activity index is then used to calculate a percentage increment by multiplying a minimum percentage increment by one plus the activity index with that result being subject to a maximum percentage increment. The Commission will initially set the weighting factor at 0.5, the minimum percentage increment at 0.1 (10%), and the maximum percentage increment at 0.2 (20%). Equations Ai = (C * Bi) + ( (1-C) * Ai-1) Ii+1 = smaller of ( (1 + Ai) * N) and M X i+1 = Ii+1 * Yi where, Ai = activity index for the current round (round i) C = activity weight factor
  • http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/44/releases/da020563.pdf http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/44/releases/da020563.txt
    • value based on the bidding activity on that license. This methodology allows the increments to be tailored to the activity level of a license, decreasing the time it takes for active licenses to reach their final value. The formula used to calculate this increment is included as Attachment F. We adopt our proposal of initially setting the weighing factor at 0.5, the minimum percentage increment at 0.1 (10 percent), and the maximum at 0.2 (20 percent).138 The Bureau retains the discretion to change the minimum acceptable bids and bid increments if it determines that circumstance so dictate. The Bureau will do so by announcement in the Automated Auction System. Under its discretion, the Bureau may also implement an absolute dollar floor
  • http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/45/releases/da020265.pdf http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/45/releases/da020265.txt
    • most recent bidding round plus one minus the weighting factor times the activity index from the prior round. The activity index is then used to calculate a percentage increment by multiplying a minimum percentage increment by one plus the activity index with that result being subject to a maximum percentage increment. The Commission will initially set the weighting factor at 0.5, the minimum percentage increment at 0.1 (10%), and the maximum percentage increment at 0.2 (20%). Equations Ai = (C * Bi) + ( (1-C) * Ai-1) Ii+1 = smaller of ( (1 + Ai) * N) and M X i+1 = Ii+1 * Yi where, Ai = activity index for the current round (round i) C = activity weight factor
  • http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/45/releases/da020470.pdf http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/45/releases/da020470.txt
    • value based on the bidding activity on that license. This methodology allows the increments to be tailored to the activity level of a license, decreasing the time it takes for active licenses to reach their final value. The formula used to calculate this increment is included as Attachment F. We adopt our proposal of initially setting the weighing factor at 0.5, the minimum percentage increment at 0.1 (10 percent), and the maximum at 0.2 (20 percent). The Bureau retains the discretion to change the minimum acceptable bids and bid increments if it determines that circumstance so dictate. The Bureau 67 Id. 68 Ranger and Miller also argue that we should lower the minimum opening bids because, given the small number of
  • http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/46/releases/da021257.pdf http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/46/releases/da021257.txt
    • bids received on the license in that round plus one minus the weighting factor times the activity index from the prior round. The percentage increment is then calculated as the smaller of (a) a minimum percentage increment multiplied by one plus the activity index and (b) a specified maximum percentage increment. The Commission will initially set the weighting factor at 0.5, the minimum percentage increment at 0.1 (10%), and the maximum percentage increment at 0.2 (20%). Hence, at these initial settings, the percentage increment will fluctuate between 10% and 20% depending upon the level of activity for the license. Equations Ai = (C * Bi) + ( (1-C) * Ai-1) Ii+1 = smaller of ( (1 + Ai) * N) and
  • http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/46/releases/da021871.pdf http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/46/releases/da021871.txt
    • based on the bidding activity on that license. This methodology allows the increments to be tailored to the activity level of a license, decreasing the time it takes for active licenses to reach their final value. The formula used to calculate this increment is included as Attachment F. Upon consideration of ArrayComm's comments, we will set the weighting factor at 0.5, the minimum percentage increment at 0.05 (5 percent), and the maximum at 0.2 (20 percent).79 Because only a single license is available in Auction No. 46, , we believe that it is appropriate to set the minimum bid increment at 5 percent. The Bureau reiterates that it retains the discretion to change the minimum acceptable bids and bid increments if
  • http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/53/releases/fc000418.pdf http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/53/releases/fc000418.txt
    • 119.0 Earth station location Denver, CO Washington, D.C. Seattle, WA Miami, FL DBS satellite e.i.r.p. towards the Earth station location dBW 48.8 52.6 46.7 52.6 Earth station elevation above mean sea level mm 1.58 0.01 0.01 0.0 Earth station elevation angle degrees 41.8 27.6 35.2 37.7 Free space loss dB 205.9 206.1 206.0 205.9 Earth station antenna miss-pointing error dB 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 Atmospheric absorption dB 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 Clear-sky receive system noise temperature Kelvin 85 85 85 85 Clear-sky earth station antenna G/T dB 14.5 14.5 14.5 14.5 C/I for other assignments in the BSS Plan dB 20.0 20.0 20.0 20.0 Clear-sky feeder link C/(N+I) dB 26.2 26.2 26.2 26.2 Clear-sky carrier-to-noise plus interference ratio dB 10.7 13.6
  • http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/53/releases/fc020116.pdf
    • of license. (2) Prior to December 8, 2000, notwithstanding any contrary provisions in this part, the frequency pairs 12.220/12.460 GHz, 12.260/12.500 GHz, 12.300/12.540 GHz and 12.340/12.580 GHz, were authorized for low power, limited coverage systems subject to the following provisions: (1) Maximum equivalent isotropically radiated power (EIRP) shall be 55 dBm; (2) The rated transmitter output power shall not exceed 0.5 watts; (3) Frequency tolerance shall be maintained to within 0.01 percent of the assigned frequency; (4) Maximum beamwidth shall not exceed 4 degrees. However, the sidelobe suppression criteria contained in § 101.115 of this part shall not apply, except that a minimum front-to-back ratio of 38 dB shall apply; (5) Upon showing of need, a maximum bandwidth of 12 MHz
  • http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/53/resources/M_Pollak.doc http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/53/resources/M_Pollak.pdf
    • of license. (2) Prior to December 8, 2000, notwithstanding any contrary provisions in this part, the frequency pairs 12.220/12.460 GHz, 12.260/12.500 GHz, 12.300/12.540 GHz and 12.340/12.580 GHz, were authorized for low power, limited coverage systems subject to the following provisions: (1) Maximum equivalent isotropically radiated power (EIRP) shall be 55 dBm; (2) The rated transmitter output power shall not exceed 0.5 watts; (3) Frequency tolerance shall be maintained to within 0.01 percent of the assigned frequency; (4) Maximum beamwidth shall not exceed 4 degrees. However, the sidelobe suppression criteria contained in § 101.115 of this part shall not apply, except that a minimum front-to-back ratio of 38 dB shall apply; (5) Upon showing of need, a maximum bandwidth of 12 MHz
  • http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/58/comments/da041639-counciltree.pdf
    • 2.7 1 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 Gainesville, FL 0.3 2 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 Hagerstown, MD 0.4 2 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 Houston, TX 5.0 1 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 Joplin, MO 0.2 2 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 Lakeland, FL 0.5 2 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 Manchester, NH 0.6 2 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 Portland, ME 0.5 2 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 Poughkeepsie, NY 0.5 2 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 San Diego, CA 2.8 1 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 Springfield, MO
  • http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/63/resources/MVDDS_rules_excerpts.doc http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/63/resources/MVDDS_rules_excerpts.pdf
    • of license. (2) Prior to December 8, 2000, notwithstanding any contrary provisions in this part, the frequency pairs 12.220/12.460 GHz, 12.260/12.500 GHz, 12.300/12.540 GHz and 12.340/12.580 GHz, were authorized for low power, limited coverage systems subject to the following provisions: (i) Maximum equivalent isotropically radiated power (EIRP) shall be 55 dBm; (ii) The rated transmitter output power shall not exceed 0.5 watts; (iii) Frequency tolerance shall be maintained to within 0.01 percent of the assigned frequency; (iv) Maximum beamwidth shall not exceed 4 degrees. However, the sidelobe suppression criteria contained in §101.115 shall not apply, except that a minimum front-to-back ratio of 38 dB shall apply; (v) Upon showing of need, a maximum bandwidth of 12 MHz may be authorized per
  • http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/72/resources/ServiceRules.pdf
    • 120 kilometers of the Operating within 120 kilometers of the US/Canadian border US/Canadian border ··Maximum ERP for base side frequencies on channels 161 Maximum ERP for base side frequencies on channels 161-- 195. 195. Distance from border (KM) Distance from border (KM) ERP (Watts) ERP (Watts) Less than 0.3 Less than 0.3 Operations Operations not permitted not permitted 0.3 0.3 ­­0.5 0.5 55 0.5 0.5 ­­0.6 0.6 10 10 0.6 0.6 ­­0.8 0.8 20 20 0.8 0.8 ­­2.0 2.0 25 25 2.0 2.0 ­­4.0 4.0 50 50 4.0 4.0 ­­5.0 5.0 100 100 5.0 5.0 ­­6.0 6.0 200 200 Beyond 6.0 Beyond 6.0 500 500
  • http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/80/releases/da001226.doc http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/80/releases/da001226.pdf http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/80/releases/da001226.txt
    • most recent bidding round plus one minus the weighting factor times the activity index from the prior round. The activity index is then used to calculate a percentage increment by multiplying a minimum percentage increment by one plus the activity index with that result being subject to a maximum percentage increment. The Commission will initially set the weighting factor at 0.5, the minimum percentage increment at 0.1, and the maximum percentage increment at 0.2. (See example below.) Ai = (C * Bi) + ( (1-C) * Ai-1) Ii+1 = smaller of ( (1 + Ai) * N) and M where, Ai = activity index for the current round (round i) C = activity weight factor Bi = number of bids in
  • http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/82/releases/da012605.pdf http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/82/releases/da012605.txt
    • most recent bidding round plus one minus the weighting factor times the activity index from the prior round. The activity index is then used to calculate a percentage increment by multiplying a minimum percentage increment by one plus the activity index with that result being subject to a maximum percentage increment. The Commission will initially set the weighting factor at 0.5, the minimum percentage increment at 0.1 (10%), and the maximum percentage increment at 0.2 (20%). Equations Ai = (C * Bi) + ( (1-C) * Ai-1) Ii+1 = smaller of ( (1 + Ai) * N) and M X i+1 = Ii+1 * Yi where, Ai = activity index for the current round (round i) C = activity weight factor
  • http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/conferences/combin2000/releases/98540131.pdf
    • (2) Some of the experimental work uses a measure based on the union of all bids. 23 Charles River Associates 4Operational Parameters Process parameters In Rule 9 four levels of bid aggressiveness are outlined. With each is a weight. A single pattern of weights has been used in the experiments. These are: 1 = 1.0; 2 = 0.8; 3 = 0.5; 4 = 0 So, full credit is given to a bid that ends the phase in the winning set. A bid that was enough to be in the winning set when tendered but emerged beaten by simultaneously submitted bids would get .8 of the activity as credit. Bids that are greater than the sum of the best price of singles
  • http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/conferences/combin2000/releases/98540192.pdf
    • procedure. 15 In CN, subjects are endowed with cash, and bid to acquire a gamble, it G, yielding private binary outcomes consisting of a high value, it M, for subject i on auction t, or a low value, it m: - = = t it t it it p m p M G 1 y probabilit with , 0.9) 0.75, 0.5, (1, y probabilit with , where ] , [ ], , [ Ht Lt it Ht Lt it m m m M M M e e (or 0), each chosen from the indicated elements with constant probability. Thus, the prizes, true to the independent private values model, are known privately to each bidder i, on auction t, but bidders do
  • http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/conferences/combin2000/releases/98540193.pdf
    • (mean, median) for all of the superadditive environments: Table 4.1.2a Mean (Median) Efficiency by Treatment: Superadditive Environment Nonflexible Flexible Equal 74.5 (78.5) 82.7 (91.0) Unequal 65.0 (61.0) 80.4 (91.0) Table 4.1.2b Count of 100% Efficiency Outcomes by Treatment Superadditive Environment. Nonflexible Flexible Equal 5 (n=26) 2 (n=29) Unequal 0 (n=27) 2 (n=25) Figure 4.1.1d Inefficiency License Allocation and Points 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 1 2 3 4 5 License Points Number of Observations Points a=1 Points a=1.5 22 In addition to the superadditive value structure of each group of 5 licenses, we assigned three other properties to each group: 1. The number of bidders.18 2. Whether there exists a competitive equilibrium (CE) set of prices for each license at
  • http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/conferences/combin2000/releases/cr_1.pdf
    • 2.8 15 4 2 2.4 15 5 2 2.2 15 6 1 1.6 13 7 1 1.3 11 8 1 1.1 11 9 0 0.6 8 10 0 0.3 6 11 1 0.6 8 12 1 0.8 9 13 4 2.4 15 14 4 3.2 15 15 2 2.6 15 16 1 1.8 14 17 0 0.9 10 18 0 0.5 7 19 0 0.2 6 20 1 0.6 8 21 0 0.3 7 22 1 0.7 8 23 0 0.3 7 24 0 0.2 6 25 0 0.1 5 Each of the two alternatives for setting bid increments has its advocates on our team. Those who favor the uniform 10% increment admire its simplicity, argue that the associated efficiency loss
  • http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/conferences/combin2000/releases/hazlett.pdf
    • Channel 1/94 0.64 Cable TV Network of New Jersey (financial news) 7/83 1.80 Washington Television n.a n.a. New York Channel n.a. n.a. California Channel 2/91 5.22 Michigan Government TV 7/96 1.61 Pennsylvania Cable Network 9/79 2.34 Central Florida News 13 10/97 n.a. County Television Network San Diego 7/96 0.76 Ecumenical Television Channel 1983 0.50 International Television Broadcasting (Time Warner) 4/86 0.5 0 MediaOne/CAMA (Atlanta) 12/95 0.5 0 46 Table 9 Regional News and Public Affairs Services on Cable TV, continued Network Launch Date Subscribers (millions) Metro Channels n.a. 2.20 New England Cable News n.a. 2.50 NGTV-National Greek Television 12/87 n.a. Nippon Golden Network (Japanese language) 1/82 0.02 Ohio News Network 5/97 0.32 Pennsylvania Cable Network 9/79 1.70 Six News Now (Florida)
  • http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/conferences/combin2001/papers/Wye_river_DAC.pdf
    • ò Bid 1 Bid 2 Bid 3 Bid 4 Bid 5 ò ò ò ò ò Bid amt. $22 $24 $20 $16 $8 sA 0 sA sA 0 sB sB 0 sB 0 + + + + + 0 sC sC 0 sC + + + + + Minimize + + Dual Formulation Objective Value: $33 ,, ,, ,, ,, 0.5 0 0 0.5 0.5 9 13 11 Objective Value: $33 Dual Problem Solution: Pseudo-Duals s Rassenti, Smith and Bulfin (1982) as well as DeMartini, Kwasnica, Ledyard and Porter (1999) suggest solving for pseudo-dual prices in order to adjust the over-estimated shadow prices s The idea is to use the provisional winners as the "mark" for adjusting down the shadow prices
  • http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/conferences/combin2001/papers/combexch.pdf
    • ,v+ ),for someconstant >0. [A2]agentidoesnotknowtheactualvalueofx,butonlythedistributionalinformation. 15Note,thisisaslightabuseofnotationbecausetrade iisnotrequiredtobeinthemaximaltradewhen agentibidstruthfully(althoughthisistheinterestingcase). 32 [A3]theavailablesurplustoallocateasdiscounttoagentiisexogeneous,equalto , where >0isaconstant. [A4]exante(BB)issufficient,suchthattheruleisbudget-balancediftheexpected paymentgiventhedistributionofcriticalvalueisnogreaterthantheavailablesurplus. Averagecasebudget-balanceisusefulinthistheoreticalanalysisbecauseitallowsthe budget-balancedparameterforeachpaymentruletobefixedandknowntotheagentbefore itsubmitsitsbid. Noticethatwedonotmodeltheequilibriumeffectofanagent'sownbiddingstrategy onthedistributionoverthecriticalvaluex;neitherdowemodeltheequilibriumeffectof anagent'sownbiddingstrategyontheavailablesurplustoallocateasdiscounts.Thissaid, wedonotneedtomakeanydistributionalassumptionsaboutanagent'svaluations. InSection5.2wedeterminetheoptimalbiddingstrategyofagentiineachpayment rule,asafunctionoftheparameteroftherule,suchasCtinThreshold,orµinFractional. InSection5.3weconsidertheexpecteddiscounttotheagentwiththisoptimalbidding strategy,andthencomputetheoptimalmanipulationundereachpaymentrulewhenthe parametersareselectedtogiveexantebudget-balance.Theanalysisleadstoarelationship betweentheavailablesurplus, ,andthemanipulation, i( ),selectedbytheagentin eachrule. ThroughoutthissectionwechoosetoillustratetheanalysiswithrespecttotheThreshold rule.Weomittheanalysisoftheotherrules,andjustgivetheresultsoftheanalysisin tabularform. 5.2DeterminingtheOptimalManipulation Manipulationbyanagenthastwoeffectsontheexpectedutilityforanagent:(i)the probabilityoftheadjustedbidbeingaccepteddecreases,and(ii)thetotalutilityifthebid isacceptedcangoupbecausetheagent'spaymentmightbereduced.Paymentruleschange (ii)butnot(i),andinturneffectagents'bidsandtheefficiencyoftheexchange. InFigure9weplottheutilityforaparticularbid,b=v- ,asthecriticalvaluexvaries. Recallthatanagent'sutilityui( )forabidb=v- is ui( )= v-p,ifv- >x 0, otherwise wherepisthepaymentbytheagenttotheexchangewhenitsbidisaccepted.Eachsubplot inFigure9isforadifferentpaymentscheme,andeachlinewithintasubplotcorresponds totheutilitytoanagentforadifferentbidasthecriticalvaluexchanges.Weassumein thisplotthattheagent'svalueisv=1,andconsidercriticalvalues0 x 1andbids with {0,0.3,0.5}.TheThresholdparameter,Ct=0.4,andtheFractionalparameter, 33 µ=0.5.Althoughnotplottedhere,thecurvesforEqualaresimilartotheNo-Discountcase (exceptshiftedhigherinutilitybyaconstantamount),andLargeissimilartoThreshold. 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 Critical value, x Utility bid = 1.0 bid = 0.7 bid = 0.5 (a)Vickrey 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 Critical value, x Utility (b)No-Discount 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 Critical value, x Utility
  • http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/conferences/combin2001/papers/parkes.pdf
    • tionoftherule,e.g.valueforC,thatleadstobudget-balance giventhatagentsfollowthisoptimalbiddingstrategy.The analysisleadstoarelationshipbetweentheavailablesur- plusandthedegreeofmanipulationforeachpaymentrule (seeFigure4). Onecanbecriticalofourassumptions.Weleaveun- definedboththevaluationdistributionfunctionsFl v and thedistributionthatdefinestheitemanindividualagent values.ItisquitelikelythattherearenoFl v thatare consistentwithourassumptionofauniformlydistributed second-highestbidinequilibrium.Inaddition,weadopt average-casebudget-balanceandcomputepaymentrulesbe- foreagentsbid,butignoreanyeffectthatruleshaveonsur- plusviaagents'biddingstrategies. However,webelievethatthisanalysishassignificant value.Itsmainsuccessisthatitclearlydemonstratesthe effectthatdifferenttypesofbudget-balancedVickrey-based paymentrulescanhaveonagentmanipulation.Weleavea fullequilibriumanalysisforfuturework. GraphicalIntuition.Manipulationhastwoeffectsonthe expectedutilityforanagent:(i)theprobabilityofthead- justedbidbeingaccepteddecreases,and(ii)thetotalutility ifthebidisacceptedcangoupbecausetheagent'spayment mightbereduced.Paymentruleschange(ii)butnot(i),and inturneffectagents'bidsandtheefficiencyoftheexchange. InFigure2weplottheutilityforaparticularbid,b v ,asthevalueoftheoutsidebidxvaries,forpayment schemesVickrey,No-Discount,ThresholdandFractional. Eachsubplotisforasinglescheme,withindividualcurves correspondingtodifferentbids.6 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 Highest outside bid, x Utility bid = 1.0 bid = 0.7 bid = 0.5 (a)Vickrey 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 Highest outside bid, x Utility (b)No-Discount 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 Highest outside bid, x Utility (c)Threshold 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 Highest outside bid, x Utility (d)Fractional Figure2:Utilityofbidsb v with f g,v
  • http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/conferences/combin2001/papers/sandholm1.pdf
    • orderingcouldbeused).Onecouldalsotrytoidentifysetsof bidsthatarticulatethebidgraph,andbranchonallofthebids intheset.However,tokeepthecomputationlineartimeinthe sizeof ,CABOBsimplygivesfirstprioritytoarticulation bids,andiftherearenone,usesotherbidorderingschemes, discussedlater.Ifthereareseveralarticulationbids,CABOB branchesontheonethatisfoundfirst(theotherswillbefound atsubsequentlevelsofthesearch).Onecouldalsouseamore elaborateschemeforchoosingamongarticulationbids. TheCOMPLETEspecialcase Instep(1),CABOBcheckswhetherthebidgraph is complete: Ò´Ò ½µ ¾ .Ifso,onlyoneoftheremaining bidscanbeaccepted.CABOBthuspicksthebidwithhighest price,updates £ ifappropriate,andprunesthesearchpath. TheNOEDGESspecialcase Instep(1),CABOBcheckswhetherthebidgraph has anyedges( ¼).Ifnot,itacceptsalloftheremaining bids,updates £ ifappropriate,andprunesthesearchpath. Preprocessing Severalpreprocessingtechniqueshavebeenproposedfor search-basedwinnerdeterminationalgorithms[Sandholm, 1999],andanyofthemcouldbeusedinconjunctionwith CABOB.However,inCABOBthesearchitselfisfast,sowe didnotwanttospendsignificanttimepreprocessing(since thatcoulddwarfthesearchtime).Theonlypreprocessingthat CABOBdoesisthatasabid Üarrives,CABOBdiscardsev- erybid Ýthat Üdominates(ÔÜ ÔÝandËÜ ËÝ),and discardsbid Üifitisdominatedbyanyearlierbid. 4BidOrderingHeuristics Instep(10)ofCABOB,therearepotentiallyalargenum- berofbidsonwhichCABOBcouldbranchon.Wedeveloped severalbidorderingheuristicsformakingthischoice. ¯ NormalizedBidPrice(NBP):[SandholmandSuri, 2000].BranchonabidwiththehighestÛ Ô ´ Ë µ « . Itwasconjectured[SandholmandSuri,2000]that« slightlylessthan0.5wouldbebest(since« ¼ givesthebestworst-caseboundwithinagreedyalgo- rithm[Lehmannetal.,1999]),butwedeterminedexper- imentallythat«¾ ¼ ½ yieldsfastestperformance. ¯ NormalizedShadowSurplus(NSS):Theproblemwith NBPisthatittreatseachitemasequallyvaluable.It couldbemodifiedtoweightdifferentitemsdifferently basedonstaticpricesthat,e.g.,thesellerguessesbefore theauction.Weproposeamoresophisticatedmethod wheretheitemsareweightedbytheir"values"inthere- mainingsubproblem.WeusetheshadowpriceÝ from theremainingDUALproblemasaproxyfortheworth ofanitem.Wethenbranchonthebidwhosepricegives thehighestsurplusabovetheworthoftheitems(nor- malizedbytheworthssothesurplushastobegreaterif thebidusesvaluableitems):Û Ô È ¾Ë Ý ´ È ¾Ë Ý µ « .Next Thiscorrespondstovariableordering.ChoosingbetweentheIN-branch (Ü ½)andtheOUT-branch(Ü ¼)firstcorrespondstovalueordering. InthecurrentversionofCABOB,wealwaystrytheIN-branchfirst.The reasonisthatwetrytoincludegoodbidsearlysoastofindgoodsolutions early.Thisenablesmorepruningthroughupperbounding.Italsoimproves theanytimeperformance.CPLEX,ontheotherhand,usesvalueorderingas wellinthatitsometimestriestheOUT-branchfirst.Infutureresearchwe plantoexperimentwiththatoptioninCABOBaswell. weshowedexperimentallythatthefollowingmodifica- tiontothenormalizationleadstofasterperformance: Û Ô È ¾Ë Ý ÐÓ ´ È ¾Ë Ý µ WecallthisschemeNSS. ¯ BidGraphNeighbors(BGN):Branchonabidwiththe largestnumberofneighborsinthebidgraph .The
  • http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/conferences/combin2001/papers/sandholm6.pdf
    • ÓÑÔÐ Ü Ø Ý Ö × × Ø ¿ 500 1000 1500 2000bids 1.25 1.5 1.75 2 2.25 2.5 2.75 3 Log_10seconds Weightedrandomdistribution 400items 300items 200items 100items ÙÖ Ü ÙØ ÓÒ Ø Ñ ´ÔÖ ÔÖ Ó ×× Ò Ø Ñ ÔÐÙ× × Ö Ø Ñ µ ÓÒ Ø Û Ø Ö Ò ÓÑ ×ØÖ ÙØ ÓÒº 500 1000 1500 2000bids 0.5 0.75 1 1.25 1.5 1.75 2 2.25 Log_10seconds Searchtimeonly ÙÖ Ë Ö Ø Ñ ÓÒ Ø Û Ø Ö Ò ÓÑ ×ØÖ ÙØ ÓÒº 25 50 75 100bids -1 0 1 2 3 Log_10seconds Uniformdistribution,3itemsperbid 100items 75items 50items 25items ÙÖ Ü ÙØ ÓÒ Ø Ñ ÓÒ Ø ÙÒ ÓÖÑ ×ØÖ ÙØ ÓÒº × Ø ÐÓÒ Ö¸ Ø Ø ×¸ Ø
  • http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/conferences/combin2001/papers/vsmith.pdf
    • Yes 100, 99, 95, 95 2b CMA 3 1.07 Yes 91, 94, 94 SMA 1 1.07 Yes 100 CMA 2 1.07 No 95, 95 SMA 1 1.07 No 100 CMA 2 1.25 Yes 100, 91 SMA 1 1.25 Yes 100 Figure 1: Location Synergies 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 Figure 2: Inefficient License Allocation and Points 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 1 2 3 4 5 License Points Number of Observations Points a=1 Points a=1.5 Figure 3. Relative Prices: Additive Values Figure 4. Relative Prices: Superadditive Values Figure 5a: Cumulative Distributions Low Synergy 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 20 40 60 80 100 % Efficient % of Observations SMA CMA Figure 5b: Cumulative Distributions Medium Synergy
  • http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/conferences/combin2003/papers/wurman.pdf
    • enceofthecompetitiveallocations.Let f [0,1]bethefre- quencywithwhichallocationfisannouncedasthewinner,en- ablingthemembersofthatallocationtopass.Ateveryiteration, oneoftheCAsmustbeannouncedasthewinningbundle.Thus, X f F f=1. (12) Ifallocationfisnotcompetitivethen f=0.Inotherwords, f xf. (13) Anallocationcannotbecompetitiveunlessatleastoneagentis activelybiddingonit. xf X i f yi,fi, f F (14) Bydefinition,competitiveallocationsincreasetheirvalueatthe samerate,whileifapotentialCAturnsouttobenotcompetitive, itsslopemustbelessthanthoseallocationsthatarecompetitive. Considerthecasewherefiscompetitive,thatis,xf=1. Ifx f=1,then f= f; ifx f=0,then f f. AMILPformofthislogicalconstraintis f- f+Nxf+Nx f 2N, (15) f- f-Nxf+Nx f N. (16) Everycompetitiveallocationwillhavesomeprobabilityofbeing selectedasthewinningallocation.Let fbethefrequencywith whichtheauctioneerselectssolutionf.Itisnottruethatallcom- petitiveallocationsareselectedequallyoftenduringaninterval; theyareonlyequallylikelytobechosenwhentheyaretied.Con- siderthebiddingpatterninatwo-agent,two-itemscenariowhere Agent1isbiddingonlyonAB,andAgent2isalternatingbetween biddingonAandbiddingonAB.InthoseroundsinwhichAgent2 bidsonA,{-,AB}istheonlyCA.Inthealternaterounds,Agent2 mayincreaseitsbidonAB,therebytyingAgent1andhavinga 0.5probabilityofbeingdeclaredthecurrentwinner.Thus,Agent2 willbidonAhalfthetime,onABaquarterofthetime,andpass theremainingquarterofthetime. Thisanalysissuggestaconnectionbetweenagenti'sbehaviorand thefrequencywithwhichiisnotamemberofthewinningalloca- tion.Agentibidswheneveroneoftheothercompetitivealloca- tionspass.Weemployanotherconstantthatisusedduringprob- lemconstruction:letGf,i=1ifiisallocatedabundleinf,and Gf,i=0otherwise. 1- i,pass=X f F (1-Gf,i) f. (17) ThefinalpieceoftheMILPistheobjectivefunction.Wetake asourobjectivethemaximizationofthenumberofcompetitive allocations. maximizeX f xf. SolvingtheMILPoutlinedabovewillcomputethebundlesthat areineachagentsbestresponsesetgoingforward(thosethathave yi,b=1),whichallocationswillbecompetitive(thoseforwhich xf=1),andhowmuchattentioneachagentpaystoeachbundle initsdemandset.Fromtheattentionwecancomputetheslopeof thepriceofeachbundleandtheslopeoftheallocations,bothof whicharenecessarytodeterminethedurationoftheinterval.The completeMILPisshowninFigure3.3. 4.WORKEDEXAMPLE TheresultofapplyingthealgorithmtotheexampleinTable1is showninFigure1.Inthissection,wehighlightsomeofthesteps intheprocessforexpositorypurposes.Table2showsthecomputa- tionsinvolvedatsixofthetenstepsinvolvedinsolvingtheauction. Eachstepshowsthepricesatthedesignatedtime,thepotentially competitiveallocations(withthosethatremaincompetitiveinthe intervaldesignatedwithanasterisk),eachagent'spotentialdemand set,andeachagent'sallocationofattention.Theattentioncolumns aresummedtogivethetrajectoriesofthepricesgoingforward. Att=0,thepricesarezeroandABCisthesoleelementineach agent'sdemandset.SincetherearefourCAs,andnootherbundles distractingthebidders,eachCAwinsonefourthofthetime.At time2/3,thebundlesABandACenterAgent1'sdemandset,and BCentersAgent2's.Bothagentsfocustheirattentiononthenew elements,althoughABCremainsinAgent2'sdemandseteven thoughtheagentallocatesnoattentiontoitbecausetheslopeof ABCmatchestheslopeofBC. Wethenskiptostep7whereweseeacomplexallocationofatten- tionacrossthebundles,yetonethatcontinuestosatisfythecon- straintsoftheproblemandexactlymatchesthesimulationpattern. Itisalsointerestingtonotethattheinflectionatstep7iscausedby theallocation{A,BC,­,­}enteringtheCAset.Theeffectofthis isclearlyvisibleinFigure2.Atstep8,weseeaninterestingeffect whenBCentersAgent4'sdemandset.ThepriceofBCatthetime is15,sowhenAgent4suddenlyjoinsthebidding,theallocation {A,­,­,BC}suddenlybecomescompetitive,asseenbythedra- maticriseinitsvalue.Atstep9,wehaveourfirstagentdropout becausenobundlesprovidepositivesurplus,andweseeanotherin- flectioncausedbytheallocation{­,­,C,AB}.Itisalsointeresting thatthenewcompetitiveallocationincludesAgent4eventhough
  • http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/conferences/combin2003/presentations/parkes8fcc03a.pdf
    • minimize the maximal ex post regret. ! Fractional. Each agent gets !i='!VCG,i ! Large. Allocate payoff in order !1¸!2¸!3... ! Reverse.... Consider VCG-based schemes. Set objective to min D(!, !VCG), for distance D(.,.). 11/23/2003 Combinatorial Exchanges Stylized Representations figure here XX adjusted price bid price 11/23/2003 Combinatorial Exchanges Threshold: Special Cases ! Implements the k-DA uniform price, double auction with k=0.5(Wilson'85) ! Thresholdpayoff division implemented with price p*=0.5(min(ak+1,bk)+max(bk+1,ak)), asks a1b2>...bm, k items trade ! Second-best (for efficiency) for the standard single item bargaining problem, for iidand Uniform [0,1] values and costs (Myerson & Satterthwaite, 83) 11/23/2003 Combinatorial Exchanges Experimental Validation ! Limited strategy space: ! bi(S)=(1-() vi(S), "S, if buyer ! bi(S)=(1+()vi(S), "S, if seller x*((,(*)is the allocation, pi((,(*)is payment
  • http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/data/papersAndStudies/SmMethFactSheet.pdf
    • bidding round plus one minus the weighting factor times the activity index from the prior round. The activity index is then used to calculate a percentage increment by multiplying a minimum percentage increment by one plus the activity index with that result being subject to a maximum percentage increment. In many auctions the Commission initially sets the weighting factor at 0.5, the minimum percentage increment at 0.1 (10%), and the maximum percentage increment at 0.2 (20%). Equations Ai = (C * Bi) + ( (1-C) * Ai-1) Ii+1 = smaller of ( (1 + Ai) * N) and M X i+1 = Ii+1 * Yi where, Ai = activity index for the current round (round i) C = activity weight factor
  • http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/data/papersAndStudies/expsmoth.pdf
    • the current bidding period plus one minus the weighting factor times the activity index from the previous round. The activity index is then used to calculate a percentage increment by multiplying a minimum percentage increment by one plus the activity index with that result being subject to a maximum percentage increment. The Commission anticipates initially setting the weighting factor at 0.5, the minimum percentage increment at 0.05, and the maximum percentage increment at 0.2. The mathematical formulas can be found in the Equations section, following. The Automated Auction System retains the capability to calculate the percentage increment as a fixed value for all licenses (e.g., 10%). The Commission will announce, prior to the start of each auction, the specific bid increment
  • http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/data/papersAndStudies/fc000289.pdf
    • Aug. 5, 1999, at 6. 6 Inquiry Concerning The Deployment Of Advanced Telecommunications Capability To All Americans In A Reasonable And Timely Fashion, And Possible Steps To Accelerate Such Deployment Pursuant To Section 706 Of The Telecommunications Act Of 1996, Report, 14 FCC Rcd 2398, 2422. 7 Id. at 2406. Figure 1. Maximum Downstream Speeds Using WLL 155 25 10 0.5 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 Megabytes per Second Mobile Telephone Wireless Cable Upperbands Unlicensed Federal Communications Commission FCC 00-289 E-3 C. Service Providers 1. Cellular (800 MHz) / Broadband PCS (1900 MHz) In the United States, the current WLL in these bands is still in an early stage of development, is currently targeted at low-use/residential
  • http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/general/releases/fc990244.doc http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/general/releases/fc990244.pdf
    • assets to the trust. The applicant must not have any interest in or control of the trustee. The trust agreement must clearly state that there will be no communications with the trustee regarding the management or operation of the subject facilities, and must give the trustee authority to dispose of the license as the trustee sees fit. Consistent with section 0.5(c) of the Commisison's rules, we delegate authority to the Wireless Telecommunications Bureau to review proposed trusts to ensure that they comply with our rules. CTIA Forbearance Petition Background On September 30, 1998, the Cellular Telecommunications Industry Association filed a Petition for Forbearance (CTIA Forbearance Petition). CTIA requests that the Commission use its authority under section 10 of the Act to
  • http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/tribal/releases/d002836c.doc http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/tribal/releases/d002836c.txt
    • 518) * ($1,500/2.59) Where: $300,000 is the amount toward the first 518 square kilometers; (Total square kilometers -518) is the number of square kilometers exceeding 518; and $1,500/2.59 is the amount toward the credit for each square kilometer exceeding 518. If high bid is... Then Net Credit after application of cap is... <= $1,000,000 Not to exceed High Bid * (0.5) > $1,000,000 and <= $2,000,000 Not to exceed $500,000 > $2,000,000 Not to exceed High Bid * (0.25) Example #1. Suppose the winning bid in a future auction for EA 31 was $750,000. Upon filing its long form application the winning bidder elects to seek a credit with respect to the Big Cypress Reservation (214 square km in EA 31)
  • http://wireless.fcc.gov/commoperators/Element%209.pdf
    • phase shift; gain greater than 1. D. 180 degrees phase shift; gain greater than 1. 9A44 (A) A PLL is locked onto an incoming signal with a frequency of 1 MHz at a phase angle of 50 degrees. The VCO signal feeds the phase detector at a phase angle of 20 degrees. The peak amplitude of the incoming signal is 0.5V and that of the VCO output signal is 0.7V. What is the VCO frequency? A. 1 MHz. B. 700 kHz. C. 1.2 MHz. D. 200 kHz. 9A45 (C) The output frequency of a certain VCO changes from 50 kHz to 65 kHz when the control voltage increases from 0.5V to 1V. What is the conversion gain? A. 65 kHz. B.
  • http://wireless.fcc.gov/commoperators/GMDSS-GOC-2006.doc
    • greater than voice bandwidth and channel spacing values. 082D- The proper sequence of channel spacing from narrow to widest is: a) SSB voice, NBDP SITOR, VHF-FM voice. b) VHF-FM voice, NBDP SITOR, SSB-voice. c) NBDP SITOR, VHF-FM voice, SSB-voice. d) NBDP SITOR, SSB-voice, VHF-FM voice. 082E- Communications with an emission of F1B/J2B would typically have a channel spacing of: a) 0.5 kHz b) 0.3 kHz c) 2.8 kHz d) 3.0 kHz 082F- Communications with an emission of J3E would typically have a channel spacing of: a) 0.5 kHz b) 0.3 kHz c) 2.8 kHz d) 3.0 kHz Key Topic #082 Answer Key: A: a) B: b) C: c) D: d) E: a) F: d). KEY TOPIC #083: MF-HF: MODULATION, BANDWIDTH &
  • http://wireless.fcc.gov/commoperators/element3.doc
    • leading B by 180 degrees. D. B is leading A by 90 degrees. Answer Key: 3-12B1: D 3-12B2: C 3-12B3: A 3-12B4: D 3-12B5: C 3-12B6: B Key Topic 13: Power Relationships 3-13B1 What does the power factor equal in an R-L circuit having a 60 degree phase angle between the voltage and the current? A. 0.414 B. 0.866 C. 0.5 D. 1.73 3-13B2 If a resistance to which a constant voltage is applied is halved, what power dissipation will result? A. Double. B. Halved. C. Quadruple. D. Remain the same. 3-13B3 746 watts, corresponding to the lifting of 550 pounds at the rate of one-foot-per-second, is the equivalent of how much horsepower? A. One-quarter horsepower. B. One-half horsepower. C. Three-quarters
  • http://wireless.fcc.gov/commoperators/element6.doc
    • used to obtain more than one value of voltage from a fixed DC source? A.Use a resistance type voltage divider B.Connect voltage regulator tubes of suitable values and tap off the desired output voltage C.Both A & B D.None of the above 6A59 A The conductance (G) of a circuit if 6 A flows when 12 VDC is applied is: A.0.5 mho B.1.0 mho C.0.25 mho D.None of the above 6A60 A Two 10 W, 500 ohm resistors in parallel will dissipate how many watts? A.20 watts B.10 watts C.30 watts D.40 watts 6A61 D A 20 ohm resistor with a current of 0.25 A passing through it will dissipate how many watts? A.10 watts B.20 watts C.0.025 watts D.1.25 watts
  • http://wireless.fcc.gov/commoperators/element8.doc
    • has a pulse repetition frequency (PRF) of 400 Hz, a pulse width of 1 microsecond, and a peak power of 100 kilowatts. The average power of the RADAR transmitter is: A. 25 watts. B. 40 watts. C. 250 watts. D. 400 watts. 8-4A2 A shipboard RADAR transmitter has a pulse repetition frequency (PRF) of 1,000 Hz, a pulse width of 0.5 microseconds, peak power of 150 KW, and a minimum range of 75 meters. Its duty cycle is: A. 0.5 B. 0.05 C. 0.005 D. 0.0005 8-4A3 A pulse RADAR transmits a 0.5 microsecond RF pulse with a peak power of 100 kilowatts every 1600 microseconds. This RADAR has: A. An average power of 31.25 watts. B. A PRF of 3,200.
  • http://wireless.fcc.gov/outreach/2004broadbandforum/comments/KotzEssein.pdf
    • involvehowmuchitisused,andwhen: ·Howmuchtrafficdoesthenetworkhandle? ·Howmuchtrafficpercard? ·Howdoestrafficvaryacrosshours,days,weekdays? Overthecourseofourstudyperiodwemeasured3.3terabytes oftotaltraffic,althoughmorethanhalfthattrafficwascausedby only5%ofcards.Thebusiestcardtransferred117GB,whilethe mediancardusedonly350MB. Thedailytrafficalsovariedconsiderably.Figure1isatimese- ries,andFigure2isacumulativedistributionfunction;weusethe CDFformatinallofourdistributiongraphs.Onthebusiestday thenetworkmovedover240GB,whereasthemediandailytraffic was53MB.ThereisacleardiparoundtheThanksgivingholiday. Therewasalwayslessoutboundtrafficthaninboundtraffic,butthe proportionofoutbounddatavarieddailybetween18and89%. InFigure3wenormalizethedatabythenumberofcardsactive inthatday.Thispresentationflattensthecurvesomewhat,although thereisstillawidevariationindailyactivity. Thesefiguresshowareasonablystrongweeklypatternwithsome surprisingpeaksonMondays.InFigure4weseetheweeklypat- ternsmoreclearly.FridayandSaturdayarethequietestdays,as studentsrelax,butSundaypicksupasstudentsbegintheirhome- work.Monday'saverageisskewedbyactivityinonebuilding, Whittemore,whichincludesstudyroomsandresidencesforstu- dentsoftheTuckSchoolofBusiness.IfWhittemoreisremoved fromFigure4,Monday'strafficmatchesTuesday's(notshown). Figure1:[SNMP]Dailytraffic(GB).Adate'sbarappearstotheright ofitsticmark.Gapsintheplotrepresentholesinourdata.Notethat thereistypicallymoreinboundthanoutboundtraffic. 0 50 100 150 200 250 Sep 30Oct 07Oct 14Oct 21Oct 28Nov 04Nov 11Nov 18Nov 25Dec 02Dec 09 Date (Sundays are labeled) Total Inbound Outbound Figure2:[SNMP]Dailytraffic(GB),distributionacrossdays. 0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1 0 50 100 150 200 250 Traffic (GB) Total Inbound Outbound Figure5displaysthevariationoftrafficoverthehoursoftheday. Thebarfor10AMisskewedabove11GBbythetrafficinWhit- temore;withoutWhittemore,the10AMbardropsslightlybelow thatofthe11AMbar.WhenweexaminedtheWhittemoretraffic, wesawadramaticburstofactivity,bothinboundandoutbound, everyMondayduringthe10AMhour,oftenaccountingfornearly 100%ofcampus-widetrafficduringthathour.Wedonothavedata todeterminetheapplicationcausingthetraffic,butwespeculate thatitisaregularlyscheduledactionsuchasbackuporsoftware update. Thetrafficissteadythroughouttheafternoonandeveningwith adiparounddinner,tailingoffthroughthenightwhenstudents finallygotosleep,andrisingagainasemployeesreturntowork. Becauseourenvironmentisamixtureofresidentialandacademic uses,thisplotshowsamixtureoftheworkdaybellcurveandthe residentialeveningbellcurve. 4.2Usersandusermobility Wedidnot(andcouldnot)trackusers,butsinceforthemost parteachcardisassociatedwithoneuser,andmostusershavejust onecard,weexaminedcardsasiftheyrepresentusers.Weask: ·Howmanycardsarethere?Fromwhichvendors? ·Howmanydaysiseachcardactive? ·HowmanyAPsdoesacardvisit? ·Howmanybuildingsdoesacardvisit? Therewere1706uniqueMACaddressesseeninoursyslogtrace, mostfromafewcommonvendors(Table1).Dartmouth'scampus Figure3:[SNMP]Dailytrafficpercard(GB). 0 0.01 0.02 0.03 0.04 0.05 0.06 0.07 0.08 Sep 30Oct 07Oct 14Oct 21Oct 28Nov 04Nov 11Nov
  • http://wireless.fcc.gov/releases/birdstudy.pdf
    • provided in the Pilot Study Plan, attached hereto as Attachment A. Michigan Avian Collision Study Plan ­ Combined September 12, 2003 9 Table 3. Estimated Budget for Conducting Tower Fatality Research ­ 2 years (total) Select Towers and Prepare Sites (choose, screen, flag, visit, find field tech) $ 8,000 Field Technicians 22 technicians 3 hours per day (1-2 hours searching, 0.5-1.0 hour in transit, etc.) 78 mornings of searches $20 per hour $102,960 Technician Supervisor $25,000 Travel and other Expenses Costs for Technicians and Researchers $24,000 Data Analysis and Report (Presentation at Meetings) $19,000 Cost of lighting, and modifying and installing white strobe and blinking red incandescent lighting $~20,000 Total $ 198,960* * The total includes the cost of retrofitting 6
  • http://wireless.fcc.gov/reports/documents/avatar-migratory-bird-report10104.pdf
    • by scavengers can significantly affect estimated mortality levels. In some areas of bird kills at communication tower sites, scavenger removal is rapid and aggressive (Kale et al. 1969; Kemper 1996; Crawford 1971; Crawford and Engstrom 2001; Stoddard 1962). Stoddard reported that nocturnal scavenger removal rates were high at his Florida study site, with carcasses often being consumed or removed within 0.5 hour of dawn (Kemper 1996). Carter and Parnell (1976 and 1978) reported notable scavenging of bird carcasses at two North Carolina towers, but no mortality adjustments were calculated. For one mass kill recorded on September 4-5, 1974, Carter and Parnell (1978) estimated that the number lost to predators and in dense vegetation and wetland areas could double the 3,200 birds
  • http://wireless.fcc.gov/reports/documents/fc000289.pdf
    • Aug. 5, 1999, at 6. 6 Inquiry Concerning The Deployment Of Advanced Telecommunications Capability To All Americans In A Reasonable And Timely Fashion, And Possible Steps To Accelerate Such Deployment Pursuant To Section 706 Of The Telecommunications Act Of 1996, Report, 14 FCC Rcd 2398, 2422. 7 Id. at 2406. Figure 1. Maximum Downstream Speeds Using WLL 155 25 10 0.5 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 Megabytes per Second Mobile Telephone Wireless Cable Upperbands Unlicensed Federal Communications Commission FCC 00-289 E-3 C. Service Providers 1. Cellular (800 MHz) / Broadband PCS (1900 MHz) In the United States, the current WLL in these bands is still in an early stage of development, is currently targeted at low-use/residential
  • http://wireless.fcc.gov/services/brsebs/releases/fcc97360.doc http://wireless.fcc.gov/services/brsebs/releases/fcc97360.pdf http://wireless.fcc.gov/services/brsebs/releases/fcc97360.txt
    • calculated by dividing the number of simultaneous response station emitters in each regional class by the number of grid points in that region. As a check to determine if an adequate number of grid points has been created for performing interference analyses, Petitioners propose to establish a "measurement line" around each RSA, following the shape of the RSA boundary and 0.5 miles outside of it. Measurement points would be placed at intervals no greater than 0.5 miles along the measurement line. Petitioners would then divide all of the RSA grid points into two groups, checkerboard fashion, and calculate the power flux density from each the grid points of both groups at each point on the measurement line. Then, at each measurement
  • http://wireless.fcc.gov/siting/FCC_LSGAC_RF_Guide.doc http://wireless.fcc.gov/siting/FCC_LSGAC_RF_Guide.pdf
    • be maintained from a single, omni-directional, cellular base-station antenna to meet FCC RF exposure guidelines Effective Radiated Power (watts) per channel based on maximum total of 96 channels per antenna Effective Isotropic Radiated Power (watts) per channel based on a maximum total of 96 channels per antenna Horizontal* distance (feet) that should be maintained from a single omni-directional cellular antenna 0.5 0.82 3.4 1 1.6 4.8 5 8.2 10.8 10 16.4 15.2 25 41 24.1 50 82 34.1 100 164 48.2 For intermediate values not shown on this table, please refer to the Figure B1-1 *These distances are based on exposure at same level as the antenna, for example, on a rooftop or in a building directly across from and at
  • http://wireless.fcc.gov/weeklypn/2011/DOC-303907A1.pdf
    • 124-07-12.1 W 0004551634 CALIFORNIA RURAL SERVICE AREA #1SCOTIA 12/30/2010 02165.20000 40-24-57.4 N CA RM WMR929 124-07-12.1 W 0004551634 CALIFORNIA RURAL SERVICE AREA #1SCOTIA 12/30/2010 05945.20000 40-24-57.4 N CA RM WMR929 124-07-12.1 W 0004551634 CALIFORNIA RURAL SERVICE AREA #1SCOTIA 12/30/2010 05974.85000 40-24-57.4 N CA RM WMR929 124-07-12.1 W 0004551634 CALIFORNIA RURAL SERVICE AREA #1SCOTIA 12/30/2010 06585.00000 40-24-57.4 N CA RM WMR928 123-44-00.5 W 0004551728 CALIFORNIA RURAL SERVICE AREA #1WILLOW CREEK 12/30/2010 02115.20000 40-52-27.4 N CA RM WMR928 123-44-00.5 W 0004551728 CALIFORNIA RURAL SERVICE AREA #1WILLOW CREEK 12/30/2010 06004.50000 40-52-27.4 N CA RM WMR928 123-44-00.5 W 0004551728 CALIFORNIA RURAL SERVICE AREA #1WILLOW CREEK 12/30/2010 10628.75000 40-52-27.4 N CA RM WMR928 123-44-00.5 W 0004551728 CALIFORNIA RURAL SERVICE AREA #1WILLOW CREEK 12/30/2010 10647.50000 40-52-27.4 N
  • http://wireless.fcc.gov/weeklypn/2011/DOC-304028A1.pdf
    • N CA MD WQLV292 118-08-57.3 W 0004560946 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIICommerce 01/05/2011 23125.00000 33-58-46.5 N CA MD WQLV292 118-08-57.3 W 0004560946 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIICommerce 01/05/2011 23175.00000 33-58-46.5 N CA MD WQLV292 118-08-57.3 W 0004560946 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIICommerce 01/05/2011 23225.00000 33-58-46.5 N CA MD WQLV292 118-08-57.3 W 0004560946 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIICommerce 01/05/2011 23275.00000 33-58-46.5 N CA MD WQLU932 118-21-00.5 W 0004560948 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIInglewood 01/05/2011 19525.00000 33-57-35.6 N CA MD WQLU932 118-21-00.5 W 0004560948 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIInglewood 01/05/2011 19625.00000 33-57-35.6 N CA MD WQLU932 118-21-00.5 W 0004560948 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIInglewood 01/05/2011 23025.00000 33-57-35.6 N CA MD WQLU932 118-21-00.5 W 0004560948 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIInglewood 01/05/2011 23075.00000 33-57-35.6 N CA MD WQLU932 118-21-00.5 W 0004560948 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM
  • http://wireless.fcc.gov/weeklypn/2011/DOC-304388A1.pdf
    • 105-29-29.4 W 0004587917 New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC GILLETTE 01/25/2011 06655.00000 44-14-38.6 N WY RM WMT668 105-29-29.4 W 0004587917 New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC GILLETTE 01/25/2011 06695.00000 44-14-38.6 N WY RM WMT668 105-29-29.4 W 0004587917 New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC GILLETTE 01/25/2011 10623.12500 44-14-38.6 N WY RM WMT669 104-14-35.3 W 0004587924 New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC NEW CASTLE 01/25/2011 06315.84000 43-52-00.5 N WY RM WMT669 104-14-35.3 W 0004587924 New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC NEW CASTLE 01/25/2011 06755.00000 43-52-00.5 N WY RM WMT669 104-14-35.3 W 0004587924 New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC NEW CASTLE 01/25/2011 06815.00000 43-52-00.5 N WY RM WMT669 104-14-35.3 W 0004587924 New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC NEW CASTLE 01/25/2011 11245.00000 43-52-00.5 N MT RM WPNC734 112-05-02.6 W 0004587928 New Cingular
  • http://wireless.fcc.gov/weeklypn/2011/DOC-304657A1.pdf
    • File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City CA MD WQMJ867 121-55-24.7 W 0004608486 AMFM BROADCASTING LICENSES, LLCSUNOL 02/09/2011 00947.50000 37-37-11.5 N Page 1 AS - Aural Studio Transmitter Link State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City HI MD WLO838 157-48-53.1 W 0004604270 HAWAII PUBLIC RADIO, INC. Honolulu 02/07/2011 00945.25000 21-20-00.5 N HI MD WHA900 157-50-22.2 W 0004604277 HAWAII PUBLIC RADIO, INC. Honolulu 02/07/2011 00944.50000 21-17-37.1 N HI MD WLI676 157-50-22.2 W 0004604278 HAWAII PUBLIC RADIO, INC. HONOLULU 02/07/2011 00949.50000 21-17-37.1 N HI MD WLI672 157-50-22.2 W 0004604280 HAWAII PUBLIC RADIO, INC. HONOLULU 02/07/2011 00946.35000 21-17-37.1 N NY MD WLJ713 078-28-31.0 W 0004606994 BACKYARD BROADCASTING OLEAN LIOLEAN 02/08/2011 00950.00000 42-04-39.2 N
  • http://wireless.fcc.gov/weeklypn/2011/DOC-304911A1.pdf
    • 00450.73750 39-43-59.0 N CO AM KPF238 104-59-08.9 W 0004505743 CBS TELEVISION STATIONS INC. DENVER 02/24/2011 00455.73500 39-43-59.0 N TI - TV Intercity Relay State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City OH AM WQNJ590 081-27-09.1 W 0004522152 GRAY TELEVISION LICENSEE, LLC Marietta 02/23/2011 02037.50000 - 02049.50000 39-24-38.3 N SC MD WMV650 081-50-00.5 W 0004623635 WAGT TELEVISION, INC. JACKSON 02/22/2011 02085.50000 - 02097.50000 33-24-20.7 N SC MD WPXL631 081-50-00.5 W 0004623644 WAGT TELEVISION, INC. JACKSON 02/22/2011 06950.00000 - 06975.00000 33-24-20.7 N PA MD WPUW572 075-14-10.1 W 0004628915 UNIVISION PHILADELPHIA LLC Philadelphia 02/23/2011 06937.50000 40-02-30.0 N LA NE 090-05-38.0 W 0004629611 NEW ORLEANS HEARST TELEVISION Mandeville 02/24/2011 02097.50000 - 02109.50000 30-22-51.0 N Page 49
  • http://wireless.fcc.gov/weeklypn/2011/DOC-305045A1.pdf
    • WIRELESS PCS, LLCCHEYENNE 03/03/2011 35-41-55.7 N OK AM KNKN511 098-57-47.8 W 0004383340 NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS PCS, LLCCLINTON 03/03/2011 35-29-22.6 N OK AM KNKN511 098-57-49.0 W 0004383340 NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS PCS, LLCCLINTON 03/03/2011 35-29-24.0 N OK AM KNKN511 098-53-00.3 W 0004383340 NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS PCS, LLCCLINTON 03/03/2011 35-31-58.2 N OK AM KNKN511 098-53-01.6 W 0004383340 NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS PCS, LLCCLINTON 03/03/2011 35-32-00.5 N OK AM KNKN511 099-22-33.8 W 0004383340 NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS PCS, LLCHammon 03/03/2011 35-37-08.3 N OK AM KNKN511 097-54-16.1 W 0004383340 NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS PCS, LLCHENNESSEY 03/03/2011 36-05-43.2 N OK AM KNKN511 097-57-04.3 W 0004383340 NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS PCS, LLCKingfisher 03/03/2011 35-49-41.5 N Page 28 CL - Cellular State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency
  • http://wireless.fcc.gov/weeklypn/2011/DOC-305552A1.pdf
    • 103-48-28.3 W 0004580849 NE Colorado Cellular, Inc. CEDAR POINT 03/29/2011 06635.00000 39-22-13.9 N CO AM WPNL477 103-48-28.3 W 0004580849 NE Colorado Cellular, Inc. CEDAR POINT 03/29/2011 06855.00000 39-22-13.9 N MT AM WMS659 109-25-33.5 W 0004581400 New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC LEWISTOWN 03/28/2011 06256.54000 47-03-56.8 N WY AM WMT669 104-14-35.3 W 0004587924 New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC NEW CASTLE 04/01/2011 06315.84000 43-52-00.5 N WY AM WMT669 104-14-35.3 W 0004587924 New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC NEW CASTLE 04/01/2011 06755.00000 43-52-00.5 N WY AM WMT669 104-14-35.3 W 0004587924 New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC NEW CASTLE 04/01/2011 06815.00000 43-52-00.5 N WY AM WMT669 104-14-35.3 W 0004587924 New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC NEW CASTLE 04/01/2011 11245.00000 43-52-00.5 N MN AM WPNI856 094-33-49.4 W 0004587968 New Cingular
  • http://wireless.fcc.gov/weeklypn/2011/DOC-305717A1.pdf
    • 00951.50000 35-23-07.6 N CF - Common Carrier Fixed Point to Point Microwave State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City OR AM WQNF807 116-57-56.0 W 0004601423 RCC Minnesota, Inc. ONTARIO 04/07/2011 11245.00000 44-00-35.0 N OR AM WQNF807 116-57-56.0 W 0004601423 RCC Minnesota, Inc. ONTARIO 04/07/2011 11405.00000 44-00-35.0 N CA AM WPYU223 118-03-00.5 W 0004607706 Los Angeles SMSA Limited Partnership El Monte 04/08/2011 17865.00000 34-04-25.1 N Page 1 CF - Common Carrier Fixed Point to Point Microwave State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City CA AM WPYU223 118-03-00.5 W 0004607706 Los Angeles SMSA Limited Partnership El Monte 04/08/2011 17880.00000 34-04-25.1 N CA AM
  • http://wireless.fcc.gov/weeklypn/2011/DOC-306105A1.pdf
    • Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City PA MD WPNB888 076-32-49.5 W 0004697439 MONTROSE BROADCASTING CORP. MECHANICSVILLE 04/20/2011 00950.50000 40-59-16.1 N AS - Aural Studio Transmitter Link State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City HI AM WLO838 157-48-53.1 W 0004604270 HAWAII PUBLIC RADIO, INC. Honolulu 04/19/2011 00945.25000 21-20-00.5 N MO AM WLF812 090-13-33.5 W 0004679045 CBS RADIO HOLDINGS INC. ST LOUIS 04/18/2011 00950.50000 38-37-51.0 N CO MD WDZ697 104-50-13.4 W 0004696074 SALEM MEDIA OF COLORADO, INC AURORA 04/19/2011 00946.00000 39-39-38.0 N WI MD WPNF898 087-20-56.4 W 0004698485 NICOLET BROADCASTING, INC. Sturgeon Bay 04/20/2011 00951.00000 44-50-09.6 N WI MD WPUJ361 087-20-56.4 W 0004698493 NICOLET BROADCASTING, INC. Sturgeon Bay 04/20/2011
  • http://wireless.fcc.gov/weeklypn/2011/DOC-306419A1.pdf
    • PCS, LLCCircleville 05/06/2011 38-38-41.5 N VA AM KNKN567 078-46-06.0 W 0004525096 NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS PCS, LLCEdinburg 05/06/2011 38-48-36.4 N WV AM KNKN567 077-52-05.4 W 0004525096 NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS PCS, LLCFALLING WATERS 05/06/2011 39-34-50.6 N WV AM KNKN567 079-28-22.2 W 0004525096 NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS PCS, LLCFRANKLIN 05/06/2011 38-30-10.4 N WV AM KNKN567 079-28-59.0 W 0004525096 NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS PCS, LLCFRANKLIN 05/06/2011 38-31-00.5 N WV AM KNKN567 079-20-46.4 W 0004525096 NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS PCS, LLCFRANKLIN 05/06/2011 38-38-08.0 N WV AM KNKN567 077-59-51.4 W 0004525096 NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS PCS, LLCHEDGESVILLE 05/06/2011 39-32-46.3 N WV AM KNKN567 077-45-36.8 W 0004525096 NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS PCS, LLCKearneysville 05/06/2011 39-19-34.8 N WV AM KNKN567 078-05-15.7 W 0004525096 NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS PCS, LLCMartinsburg 05/06/2011 39-25-17.3 N WV AM KNKN567
  • http://wireless.fcc.gov/weeklypn/2011/DOC-306653A1.pdf
    • PR AM WPOV398 066-05-44.4 W 0004586908 PR Wireless, Inc. RIO PIEDRAS 05/11/2011 19565.00000 18-22-45.4 N PR AM WPOV398 066-05-44.4 W 0004586908 PR Wireless, Inc. RIO PIEDRAS 05/11/2011 19595.00000 18-22-45.4 N PR AM WPOV398 066-05-44.4 W 0004586908 PR Wireless, Inc. RIO PIEDRAS 05/11/2011 19665.00000 18-22-45.4 N WY AM WMT669 104-14-35.3 W 0004587924 New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC NEW CASTLE 05/12/2011 06315.84000 43-52-00.5 N WY AM WMT669 104-14-35.3 W 0004587924 New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC NEW CASTLE 05/12/2011 06745.00000 43-52-00.5 N WY AM WMT669 104-14-35.3 W 0004587924 New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC NEW CASTLE 05/12/2011 06755.00000 43-52-00.5 N WY AM WMT669 104-14-35.3 W 0004587924 New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC NEW CASTLE 05/12/2011 06815.00000 43-52-00.5 N WY AM WMT669 104-14-35.3 W 0004587924 New Cingular
  • http://wireless.fcc.gov/weeklypn/2011/DOC-307209A1.pdf
    • PR NE 067-14-32.5 W 0004749999 T-MOBILE PUERTO RICO LLC Rincon 06/02/2011 11265.00000 18-21-11.5 N PR NE 067-14-32.5 W 0004749999 T-MOBILE PUERTO RICO LLC Rincon 06/02/2011 11345.00000 18-21-11.5 N VA NE 078-57-18.1 W 0004750273 Virginia PCS Alliance, L.C. DEVILS KNOB 06/02/2011 06626.25000 37-54-59.4 N VA NE 079-18-51.0 W 0004750278 Virginia PCS Alliance, L.C. ELLIOTS KNOB 06/02/2011 06621.25000 38-09-53.9 N AK NE 150-02-00.5 W 0004750422 GCI Communication Corp Wasilla 06/02/2011 11055.00000 61-20-19.0 N AK NE 149-38-01.0 W 0004750442 GCI Communication Corp Wasilla 06/02/2011 11545.00000 61-30-57.0 N AZ NE 111-55-29.6 W 0004750732 airBand Communications, Inc. Scottsdale 06/02/2011 21880.00000 33-31-44.8 N AZ NE 111-58-49.7 W 0004750838 airBand Communications, Inc. Phoenix 06/02/2011 23230.00000 33-25-25.0 N TN NE 086-03-00.5 W 0004751232 Verizon Wireless Tennessee PartnershipManchester 06/03/2011 19360.00000
  • http://wireless.fcc.gov/weeklypn/2011/DOC-307787A1.pdf
    • N CA AM WHC945 117-32-46.2 W 0004743657 LOS ANGELES SMSA LIMITED PARTNECORONA 06/14/2011 11605.00000 33-51-38.1 N OR AM WQJW381 123-16-58.8 W 0004750452 Cellco Partnership GRANTS PASS 06/14/2011 06745.00000 42-24-41.4 N OR AM WQJW381 123-16-58.8 W 0004750452 Cellco Partnership GRANTS PASS 06/14/2011 10572.50000 42-24-41.4 N OR AM WQJW381 123-16-58.8 W 0004750452 Cellco Partnership GRANTS PASS 06/14/2011 11365.00000 42-24-41.4 N OK AM 095-57-00.5 W 0004757849 Conterra Ultra Broadband LLC Tulsa 06/13/2011 10875.00000 36-11-28.2 N OK AM 095-57-00.5 W 0004757849 Conterra Ultra Broadband LLC Tulsa 06/13/2011 10915.00000 36-11-28.2 N OK AM 095-57-00.5 W 0004757849 Conterra Ultra Broadband LLC Tulsa 06/13/2011 10955.00000 36-11-28.2 N CA MD WQCT372 120-14-54.4 W 0004760819 Sacramento Valley Limited Partnership Tahoe City 06/10/2011 06605.00000 39-09-00.6 N Page 7 CF - Common
  • http://wireless.fcc.gov/wtb/ATT-TMO-with-App-C.pdf
    • the porting data to determine the diversion rates), for the profit margin([Begin Confidential Information] [End Confidential Information]percent for all firms), the LTE penetration ([Begin Confidential Informationi [End Confidential Information]percent for standalone AT&T and [Begin Confidential Information] [End Confidential Information]percent for T-Mobile), and we have also estimated the Economic Model allowing the costs of the other firms to increase and using -0.5 as the industry elasticity. In each case, the Economic Model predicts that unilateral effects alone will cause prices to be higher and output to be lower every year. C-24 Federal Communications Commission Table 12.Weighted Average National Price Differences and Output Relative to No Transaction Using Alternative Model Specifications connaenuai [End Confidential Informationj 52.Overall, the output and pricing predictions we obtain
  • http://www.fcc.gov/3G/3G_appendices.doc http://www.fcc.gov/3G/3G_appendices.pdf
    • Adjacent channel Separation Distances of a 3G Mobile Station to ITFS/MDS Stations MDS/ITFS System Parameters 3G System Parameters Bandwidth Factor (dB) Maximum Undesired 3G Power Flux Density2 (dBW/m2) Minimum Distance Separation3 Protected Receiver Type Bandwidth (kHz) Modulation Type EIRP (dBW) Bandwidth (kHz) km mi Hub 125 CDMA -10 1250 10 -129 1.4 0.9 125 CDMA -10 3750 15 -124 0.8 0.5 125 W-CDMA -10 5000 16 -123 0.6 0.4 125 TDMA -10 30 -6 -145 9.3 5.8 125 TDMA -10 200 2 -137 3.5 2.2 Response Station 6000 CDMA -10 1250 -7 -127 10.0 6.2 6000 CDMA -10 3750 -2 -122 5.8 3.6 6000 W-CDMA -10 5000 -1 -121 5.0 3.1 6000 TDMA -10 30 -23 -143 64.2 39.9 6000 TDMA
  • http://www.fcc.gov/3G/3gfinalreport.doc http://www.fcc.gov/3G/3gfinalreport.pdf
    • from 3G base stations. Table 5.1: Calculation of Separation Distances, 3G Base Station to ITFS/MDS Guard Band Analysis Based on Interference Power in Adjacent or Nearby Channels 3G System Parameters ITFS/MDS System Parameters Required Separation (km) Modulation Type EIRP (dBW) Bandwidth (kHz) Protected Receiver Bandwidth (kHz) Desired Signal Power Density (dBW/m2) Adjacent Channels (No Guard Band) Guard Band Width (MHz) 0.5 1 2 CDMA 27 1250 Hub 125 -90 161 16 1.6 0.02 CDMA 27 3750 125 -90 161 16 1.6 0.02 W-CDMA 27 5000 125 -90 161 16 1.6 0.02 TDMA 27 30 125 -90 100 10 1.0 0.02 TDMA 27 200 125 -90 161 16 1.6 0.02 CDMA 27 1250 Response Station 6000 -67 6.4 0.6 0.06 0.00 CDMA
  • http://www.fcc.gov/3G/3gfinalreportappendices.doc http://www.fcc.gov/3G/3gfinalreportappendices.pdf
    • Adjacent channel Separation Distances of a 3G Mobile Station to ITFS/MDS Stations MDS/ITFS System Parameters 3G System Parameters Bandwidth Factor (dB) Maximum Undesired 3G Power Flux Density2 (dBW/m2) Minimum Distance Separation3 Protected Receiver Type Bandwidth (kHz) Modulation Type EIRP (dBW) Bandwidth (kHz) km mi Hub 125 CDMA -10 1250 10 -129 1.4 0.9 125 CDMA -10 3750 15 -124 0.8 0.5 125 W-CDMA -10 5000 16 -123 0.6 0.4 125 TDMA -10 30 -6 -145 9.3 5.8 125 TDMA -10 200 2 -137 3.5 2.2 Response Station 6000 CDMA -10 1250 -7 -127 10.0 6.2 6000 CDMA -10 3750 -2 -122 5.8 3.6 6000 W-CDMA -10 5000 -1 -121 5.0 3.1 6000 TDMA -10 30 -23 -143 64.2 39.9 6000 TDMA
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Cable/Orders/2000/da002077.doc
    • and October 28-November 3, 1998. WMDT states that WTTG-TV's share of total viewing hours in noncable homes in the cable communities falls below the required 3 percent minimum, within one standard error, as shown in the table below: Survey Households Share Standard Net Standard Year Studied Viewing Error Weekly Error Hours Circulation 1997 199 0.4 0.4 4.7 2.3 1998 185 0.5 0.5 4.7 2.3 As a result, WMDT requests that the Commission grant its petition so that it can assert its network nonduplication and syndicated exclusivity rights in the subject communities. In KCST-TV, Inc., the Commission determined that Section 76.92(f) of the rules could be waived if it could be shown that a station has not met the standards for significantly
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Comments/access_reform/samples/MCICOM.htm
    • Order and Second Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, 4 FCC Rcd. 2873 (AT&T Price Cap Order). 93. ^93 In the Matter of Competition in the Interstate Interexchange Marketplace, Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, 5 FCC Rcd 2627, 2632 (Interexchange Notice). 94. ^94 Interexchange Notice, 5 FCC Rcd at 2633. 95. ^95 Id. 96. ^96 The CAPs' market share of less than 0.5 percent only serves to demonstrate the immaturity of the competitive framework governing the exchange access market. 97. ^97 Interexchange Notice, 5 FCC Rcd at 2632. 98. ^98 Price Cap Performance Review Second Further Notice, 11 FCC Rcd 858, 873. 99. ^99 Kwoka Affidavit at 19. 100. ^100 In product markets where inputs are not controlled by a downstream entity, supply
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/News_Releases/1997/nrcc7033.html http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/News_Releases/1997/nrcc7033.txt
    • Under the Commission's revised price cap plan, the X-Factor represents the expected difference between the increase in LECs' productivity and the increase in productivity of the U.S. national economy generally, and the expected difference in the growth of LEC input prices compared to the growth rate of prices for the U.S. generally. The new 6.5 percent X-Factor also retains the 0.5 percent consumer productivity dividend which ensures that access customers benefit from the increased incentives for productivity growth that the Commission's plan creates for incumbent LECs. The Order adopted today marks the first time that the Commission has established a single X-Factor for all incumbent LECs under price cap regulation. The Commission concluded that the evidence in the record of this
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/News_Releases/1998/nrcc8060.pdf
    • 1996 Alabama N.A. N.A. N.A. 32.8 32.1 24.6 19.3 9.8 Alaska N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. Arizona N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. 24.6 20.4 Arkansas N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. 28.1 24.8 11.3 California N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. 11.2 3.6 Colorado N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. 21.2 26.0 Connecticut N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. 0.5 5.7 15.7 38.8 Delaware N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. Dist. of Columbia N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. Florida 15.0 16.7 16.4 14.8 15.1 14.2 14.4 11.4 Georgia N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. 13.7 14.0 11.7 Hawaii N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. 5.0 Idaho N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. 4.9 Illinois
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Notices/1999/fcc99120.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Notices/1999/fcc99120.txt http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Notices/1999/fcc99120.wp
    • HAI values for maximum equipped lines per switch would have only a minimal impact on the overall forward-looking cost estimation because less than 2 percent of wire centers have more than 80,000 lines. A review of the data indicates that, of the 12,506 wire centers served by non-rural LECs, only 189 (1.5 percent) have more than 80,000 lines and 57 (0.5 percent) have more than 100,000 lines. See HAI Feb. 3, 1998 model submission. 332 HAI Dec. 11, 1997 submission, Inputs Portfolio at 80. 333 HAI Dec. 11, 1997 submission, Inputs Portfolio at 80. 334 BCPM April 30, 1998 submission, Switch Model Inputs at 20-21. BCPM defines Switch Percent Line Fill as the ratio between the number of working lines on
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Notices/1999/fcc99345.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Notices/1999/fcc99345.txt
    • gains. The Commission has periodically adjusted the LEC price cap plan to ensure that it continues to provide strong incentives to incumbent LECs to provide a substantial benefit to customers, while not basing permitted prices explicitly on individual firms' costs. The X-factor adopted in the LEC Price Cap Order initiating price cap regulation for the largest LECs included an additional 0.5 percent consumer productivity dividend ("CPD") to ensure "direct benefits to ratepayers." The CPD was included to account for an expectation that, because of the more efficient regulatory scheme being adopted, future productivity growth would be faster than measured past productivity growth. Initially, price cap LECs were required to share a portion of their earnings in excess of specified rates of
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1996/fcc96325.pdf
    • and were, therefore, not directly reported, but the staff witness testified that the calculation of direct, shared, and common costs is less than one-half his proposed rate of 0.6 cents ($0.006) per minute of use for terminations routed through the tandem-office switch. The Maryland Commission ultimately adopted 1919 rates of 0.3 cents ($0.003) per minute of use end-office-switch terminations and 0.5 cents ($0.005) per minute of use for terminations at the tandem switch. 1920 808. The Illinois Commission has adopted a rate equal to 0.5 cents ($0.005) per minute of use for terminations routed directly through end-office switches and 0.75 cents ($0.0075) per minute of use for Federal Communications Commission 96-325 Illinois Commission comments at Attachment C (Illinois Commerce Commission Docket
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1997/fcc97074.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1997/fcc97074.txt http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1997/fcc97074.wp
    • data regarding the processing and completing of a telephone call. BellSouth Petition at 19-21; SBC Petition at 2; USTA Petition at 4. 39 Record estimates of the additional post-dial delay stemming from the use of QOR to route calls to ported 40 numbers, as compared to the use of LRN to route calls to ported numbers, range from 0.4 to 0.5 seconds. Pacific Petition at 5, 6 (0.4 seconds); USTA Petition at 7 (0.5 seconds); US West Petition at 14 n.19 (less than 0.5 seconds). See also ALTS Response at 4 (actual delay will depend on number of offices involved in completing QOR inquiry). The additional delay associated with QOR is comprised of the set-up time for the originating switch to
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1997/fcc97159.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1997/fcc97159.txt
    • rate increases for each basket to the rate of inflation minus an "X-Factor." 8. In the original and the interim price cap plans, the baseline X- Factor was based on the average of the short-term and long-term trends in rate reductions prior to our adoption of the original price cap plan in 1990, plus a consumer productivity dividend (CPD) of 0.5 percent. We selected the X-Factor and the CPD so that, at minimum, rates would decline more quickly than they had declined before 1990, and thus would ensure that the first benefits of price cap regulation would flow to access customers in the form of lower rates. In the LEC Price Cap Performance Review, we tentatively concluded that an analysis that
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1997/fcc97403.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1997/fcc97403.txt http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1997/fcc97403.wp
    • tariff years 1993/94 and 1994/95 because it incurred larger than expected GSF expenses as the company increased its computerization.434 In tariff year 1995/96, Frontier states that Rochester Telephone brought these expenses under control, with the result that it overestimated its BFP revenue requirement that year.435 Frontier states that Rochester Telephone's actual BFP revenue requirement for tariff year 1996/97 was within 0.5 percent of its forecast.436 265.Frontier shows that Rochester Telephone's projected per line BFP revenue requirements ranged from -1.57 percent to +2.08 percent error for any given tariff year.437 266.Frontier states that the Frontier BFP revenue requirements were projected for tariff years through 1994/95 using the tariff period's forecasted budget to perform Part 36 and 69 cost studies.438 After that time,
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/fcc99346.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/fcc99346.txt http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/fcc99346.wp
    • industry segments. As of June 1999, Warburg reported that approximately 12 percent of its assets (or around $780 million) were invested in telecommunications service providers, including Four Media Company (in which it holds a 50.6 percent interest); Covad Communications Company (20 percent interest); Primus Telecommunications Group, Inc. (14 percent interest); Global Telesystems Group, Inc. (2 percent interest); NTL Telecommunications, Inc. (0.5 percent interest); and a European joint venture ($6 million investment). These investments disqualify Warburg itself from administering the North American Numbering Plan. Lockheed and Warburg have proposed to set up a new company, Neustar, Inc. ( Neustar ), to administer the North American Numbering Plan. Neustar will be owned by an affiliate of Warburg (Warburg, Pincus Equity Partners, or WPEP,
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/fcc00193.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/fcc00193.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/fcc00193.txt
    • a productivity offset, or X-factor. In the Commission's LEC price cap formula, the X-factor represents the amount by which LECs can be expected to outperform economy-wide productivity gains. The X-factor adopted in the LEC Price Cap Order initiating price cap regulation for the largest LECs consisted of a component based on historical LEC productivity, and an additional productivity obligation of 0.5 percent as a consumer productivity dividend (CPD) to assign the first productivity gains to customers in the form of lower rates. Initially, price cap LECs were required to share a portion of their earnings in excess of specified rates of return with their access customers by temporarily reducing the price cap ceiling in a subsequent period. In 1990, the Commission
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/fcc00306.pdf
    • 2411 POLES 13.6 -70 49.2 8.9 2421 AERIAL CABLE METALLIC 10.3 -35 50.6 8.2 2421 AERIAL CABLE NONMETAL 14.9 -20 45.2 5.0 2422 UG CABLE METALLIC 13.7 -30 49.3 5.9 2422 UG CABLE NONMETAL 14.7 -20 43.5 5.2 2423 BURIED CABLE METALLIC 11.4 -10 45.5 5.7 2423 BURIED CABLE NONMETAL 14.9 -10 39.9 4.7 2424 SUBMARINE CABLE 11.7 -1 94.7 0.5 2425 DEEP SEA CABLE 18.6 -10 35.5 4.0 2426 INTRABUILDING CABLE 9.2 -10 61.5 5.3 2431 AERIAL WIRE 5.5 -31 85.1 8.3 2441 CONDUIT SYSTEMS 34.0 -10 18.3 2.7 The figures in Columns B, C, and D are percentages of gross book cost. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION APPENDIX Schedule of Annual Percentages of Depreciation for PAGE 2 VERIZON NORTHWEST INC. -
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/fcc01029.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/fcc01029.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/fcc01029.txt
    • Performance Data, Measure No. 55.1-03 (``Average Installation Interval - DSL - Line Sharing - Requires No Conditioning''), at 271-No. 55.1. In September 2000, SWBT provisioned over 1,700 line shared loops to its separate affiliate in Kansas and over 2,000 line shared loops to its separate affiliate in Oklahoma. See SWBT Chapman Reply Aff. at para. 18. In Oklahoma, SWBT missed 0.5 percent and 0.3 percent of its installation due dates for line shared DSL loops provided to its affiliate in the months of September and October 2000 respectively. During the same period in Kansas, SWBT missed 0.2 percent and 1.2 percent of its installation due dates. See SWBT Aggregated Performance Data, Measure No. 58-09 (``Percent SWBT Caused Missed Due Dates -
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2002/fcc02331.pdf
    • would always occur if the correction would shift a performance measures from ``in parity'' to ``out of parity.'' Key measures that have been out of parity would be reposted if there were at least 100 competitive LEC transactions at the sub-metric level, and there was at least a two percentage point change in the performance for benchmark measures or a 0.5 change in the z-score for retail analogue measures. See Letter from Jonathan B. Banks, General Attorney, BellSouth, to Marlene H. Dortch, Secretary, Federal Communications Commission, WC Docket No. 02-307 Attach. at 1-2 (filed Oct. 17, 2002) (BellSouth Oct. 17 Ex Parte Letter ­ #3). 44 BellSouth Reply at 30-31; BellSouth Varner Reply Aff. at para. 23; BellSouth Varner Reply Aff.,
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1998/da980856.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1998/da980856.txt http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1998/da980856.wp
    • quarter of 1998.1 On May 1, 1998, the Universal Service Administrative Company (USAC), Schools and Libraries Corporation (SLC), and Rural Health Care Corporation (RHCC) submitted the following projections of third quarter 1998 demand and administrative expenses: ($ millions) Program Program Demand Administrative Expenses Interest Income2 Total Program Costs Schools and Libraries 690.03 4.4 (0.0)4 694.4 Rural Health Care 24.3 1.2 (0.5) 25.0 Subtotal 714.3 5.6 (0.5) 719.4 High Cost 414.1 0.8 (0.7) 414.2 5 47 C.F.R. § 54.709(a)(3). 2 Low Income 125.3 0.4 (1.0) 124.7 Subtotal 539.4 1.2 (1.7) 538.9 TOTAL 1,253.7 6.8 (2.2) 1,258.3 Based on information contained in the Universal Service Worksheets, FCC Form 457, USAC submitted on May 1, 1998, end-user telecommunications revenues for the 1997 calendar year.
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1998/da981130.html http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1998/da981130.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1998/da981130.txt http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1998/da981130.wp
    • for the schools and libraries support mechanism in the third quarter of 1998, the "total program costs" for the third quarter (i.e., $325 million) is less than the demand that SLC projected. Third Quarter 1998 -- ($ millions) Program Program Demand Administrative Expenses Interest Income[14]^(10) Total Program Costs Schools and Libraries 690.0[15]^(11) 4.4 (0.0)[16]^(12) 325.0 Rural Health Care 24.3 1.2 (0.5) 25.0 Subtotal 714.3 5.6 (0.5) 350.0 High Cost 414.1 0.8 (0.7) 414.2 Low Income 125.3 0.4 (1.0) 124.7 Subtotal 539.4 1.2 (1.7) 538.9 TOTAL 1,253.7 6.8 (2.2) 888.9 Based on information contained in the Universal Service Worksheets, FCC Form 457, USAC submitted on May 1, 1998, end-user telecommunications revenues for the 1997 calendar year. On May 14, 1998, USAC submitted
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Fiber/fiber96.pdf
    • 34.4 US West 3.5 5.0 6.9 10.0 13.4 17.6 22.2 27.4 31.3 34.7 38.5 38.7 Bell Totals: 17.6 33.6 46.0 61.9 78.0 97.6 122.5 146.5 173.5 195.9 218.7 238.9 GTE Companies NA NA NA 10.1 20.9 28.6 31.6 34.0 39.8 45.4 41.8 43.7 Sprint Companies NA NA NA 2.9 5.0 5.9 7.4 9.9 12.0 14.2 16.5 18.8 Rural Companies NA 0.5 2.6 4.7 6.4 8.7 NA NA NA NA 51.3 59.3 Total Reported: 17.6 34.1 48.6 79.5 110.3 140.8 161.6 190.4 225.3 255.5 328.3 360.7 * See accompanying notes to the tables and discussion in text. 25 Table 6: Fiber Miles of Fiber Deployed by Local Operating Companies Fiber Miles in Thousands Company 1985 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Fiber/fiber97.pdf
    • S WEST 3.5 5.0 6.9 10.0 13.4 17.6 22.2 27.4 31.3 34.7 38.5 38.7 39.6 Bell Totals: 17.6 33.6 46.0 61.9 78.0 97.6 121.7 148.4 173.9 195.9 218.7 238.9 257.8 GTE NA NA NA 10.1 20.9 28.6 31.6 34.0 39.8 45.4 41.8 43.7 49.2 Sprint NA NA NA 2.9 5.0 5.9 7.4 9.9 12.0 14.2 16.5 18.8 18.7 Rural NA 0.5 2.6 4.7 6.4 8.7 NA NA NA NA 51.3 59.3 NA Total Reported: 17.6 34.1 48.6 79.5 110.3 140.8 160.8 192.3 225.6 255.5 328.3 360.7 325.7 * See accompanying notes to the tables and discussion in text. Table 6: Fiber Miles Deployed by Local Operating Companies Fiber Miles in Thousands Company 1985 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Fiber/fiber98.pdf
    • 6.9 10.0 13.4 17.6 22.2 27.4 31.3 34.7 38.5 38.7 39.6 40.4 Bell Totals: 17.6 33.6 46.0 61.9 78.0 97.6 121.7 148.4 173.9 195.9 218.7 238.9 257.8 279.4 GTE NA NA NA 10.1 20.9 28.6 31.6 34.0 39.8 45.4 41.8 43.7 49.2 54.0 Sprint NA NA NA 2.9 5.0 5.9 7.4 9.9 12.0 14.2 16.5 18.8 18.7 21.7 Rural NA 0.5 2.6 4.7 6.4 8.7 NA NA NA NA 51.3 59.3 66.6 NA Total Reported: 17.6 34.1 48.6 79.5 110.3 140.8 160.8 192.3 225.6 255.5 328.3 360.7 392.4 355.0 * See accompanying notes to the tables and discussion in text. ** Starting in 1997, Bell Atlantic data include NYNEX. Table 6: Fiber Miles Deployed by Local Operating Companies * Fiber Miles
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/499s-pn.pdf
    • for universal service contribution purposes. 4 See 47 C.F.R. § 54.708. 4 Instructions to the Telecommunications Reporting Worksheet, Form 499-S Figure 1: Table to determine if a contributor meets the de minimis standard for purposes of universal service Total intrastate, interstate and international contribution base (a) Interstate and international contribution base (b) A Amount from Block 3, Line 115 B 0.5 0.5 C Revenue stated on a quarterly basis (Line A times Line B) D Estimated quarterly payment factor for the purposes of meeting the de minimis threshold* .0099 .0294 E Estimated quarterly contribution (Line C times Line D) F Total quarterly contribution (Line E-1 plus Line E-2) G Annualizing factor 4 H Estimated annual contribution for universal service support (Line
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/hspd0202.pdf
    • other data services that wireline telephone companies have offered to business customers for some time. 3 · Reported high-speed connections to end-user customers by means of satellite or fixed wireless technologies increased at the fastest rate, 73%, during the first half of the year 2001, to 0.2 million. Reported fiber optic connections to end-user customer premises increased by 21%, to 0.5 million.8 · Subscribership to the subset of high-speed services that the Commission defines as advanced services (i.e., delivering to subscribers transmission speeds in excess of 200 kbps in each direction) increased by 38% during the first half of the year 2001, to a total of 5.9 million lines (or wireless channels) in service. Advanced services lines provided by means of
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/hspd0705.pdf
    • compared to a 13% increase in the first half of the year, from 16.4 million to 18.6 million lines. · The remaining 2.7 million high-speed connections in service at the end of 2004 were satellite or terrestrial wireless connections, fiber or powerline connections, or wireline connections other than ADSL. During 2004, satellite or terrestrial wireless connections increased by 50%, to 0.5 million, and fiber or powerline connections increased by 16%, to 0.7 million. 2) Advanced Services Lines · Advanced services lines of all technology types increased by 42%, to 28.9 million lines, during the year 2004. They increased by 23% during the second half of 2004, from 23.5 million to 28.9 million lines, compared to a 15% increase during the first
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/hspd1208_tables.doc
    • 1.1 1.4 2.5 0.8 2.9 4.4 15.0 52.6 21.5 0.3 97.5 100.0 FTTP 0.2 0.0 0.2 0.7 1.4 2.7 24.2 1.4 68.3 1.2 99.8 100.0 Satellite 53.2 35.0 88.3 * * * * 0.0 0.0 0.0 11.7 100.0 Fixed Wireless 13.1 4.4 17.5 21.1 23.0 25.1 9.4 2.0 1.8 0.2 82.5 100.0 Mobile Wireless 32.1 14.1 46.2 28.8 17.9 6.6 0.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 53.8 100.0 Power Line and Other 0.0 0.0 0.0 * * * * 0.0 * 0.0 100.0 100.0 Total 10.5 6.9 17.4 10.2 12.0 13.2 15.0 21.5 10.6 0.2 82.6 100.0 # = Rounds to Zero. * = Data withheld to maintain firm confidentiality. Note: Figures may not sum to totals due to rounding. Source: FCC Form
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ias0609_tables.doc
    • 7.3 22.0 28.0 28.3 3.0 0.7 0.0 89.3 100.0 sDSL 0.0 0.0 0.0 55.2 38.5 3.6 2.2 * * 0.0 100.0 100.0 Other Wireline 0.0 0.0 0.0 15.2 43.0 16.8 2.8 21.8 0.4 0.0 100.0 100.0 Cable Modem 0.4 1.6 2.0 0.3 3.4 4.7 11.9 35.1 * * 98.0 100.0 FTTP 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.6 1.0 1.9 15.5 1.1 79.3 0.5 99.9 100.0 Satellite 49.7 38.9 88.7 * * * * 0.0 0.0 0.0 11.3 100.0 Fixed Wireless 9.9 4.4 14.3 19.7 24.1 27.5 11.7 1.1 1.6 0.1 85.7 100.0 Mobile Wireless 21.4 10.9 32.3 26.8 35.5 4.7 0.7 * 0.0 * 67.7 100.0 Power Line and Other 0.0 0.0 0.0 * * * * 0.0 * * 100.0 100.0 Total
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ias0610_tables.doc
    • Less than 768 kbps 80,932 7,056 6,683 94,672 At least 768 kbps & Less than 1.5 mbps 8,577 5,217 13,862 27,656 At least 1.5 mbps 734 1,366 25,104 27,204 Total 90,243 13,639 45,649 149,531 Percentages Less than 768 kbps 54.1 4.7 4.5 63.3 At least 768 kbps & Less than 1.5 mbps 5.7 3.5 9.3 18.5 At least 1.5 mbps 0.5 0.9 16.8 18.2 Total 60.4 9.1 30.5 100.0 Note: Figures may not sum to totals due to rounding. Source: FCC Form 477, Part I. Fixed Connections over 200 kbps in at Least One Direction (in thousands) Downstream Speed Upstream Speed Less than 3 mbps At least 3 mbps and less than 6 mbps At least 6 mbps Total Less than
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ias0611_tables.doc
    • Less than 768 kbps 102,020 7,937 7,004 116,961 At least 768 kbps & Less than 1.5 mbps 22,352 10,997 19,533 52,882 At least 1.5 mbps 962 1,404 33,915 36,281 Total 125,334 20,338 60,452 206,124 Percentages Less than 768 kbps 49.5 3.9 3.4 56.7 At least 768 kbps & Less than 1.5 mbps 10.8 5.3 9.5 25.7 At least 1.5 mbps 0.5 0.7 16.5 17.6 Total 60.8 9.9 29.3 100.0 Note: Figures may not sum to totals due to rounding. Source: FCC Form 477, Part I. Fixed Connections over 200 kbps in at Least One Direction (in thousands) Downstream Speed Upstream Speed Less than 3 mbps At least 3 mbps and less than 6 mbps At least 6 mbps Total Less than
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ias1209_tables.doc
    • Less than 768 kbps 68,239 7,154 7,217 82,610 At least 768 kbps & Less than 1.5 mbps 7,284 7,669 10,317 25,269 At least 1.5 mbps 674 1,350 21,701 23,725 Total 76,197 16,173 39,234 131,604 Percentages Less than 768 kbps 51.9 5.4 5.5 62.8 At least 768 kbps & Less than 1.5 mbps 5.5 5.8 7.8 19.2 At least 1.5 mbps 0.5 1.0 16.5 18.0 Total 57.9 12.3 29.8 100.0 Note: Figures may not sum to totals due to rounding. Source: FCC Form 477, Part I. Fixed Connections over 200 kbps in at Least One Direction (in thousands) Download Speed Upload Speed Less than 3 mbps At least 3 mbps and less than 6 mbps At least 6 mbps Total Less than
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ias1210_tables.doc
    • Less than 768 kbps 81,125 7,980 7,278 96,383 At least 768 kbps & Less than 1.5 mbps 15,983 7,776 16,752 40,511 At least 1.5 mbps 764 1,431 29,790 31,986 Total 97,873 17,187 53,820 168,879 Percentages Less than 768 kbps 48.0 4.7 4.3 57.1 At least 768 kbps & Less than 1.5 mbps 9.5 4.6 9.9 24.0 At least 1.5 mbps 0.5 0.8 17.6 18.9 Total 58.0 10.2 31.9 100.0 Note: Figures may not sum to totals due to rounding. Source: FCC Form 477, Part I. Fixed Connections over 200 kbps in at Least One Direction (in thousands) Downstream Speed Upstream Speed Less than 3 mbps At least 3 mbps and less than 6 mbps At least 6 mbps Total Less than
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ilec-ld.pdf
    • 1996 Alabama N.A. N.A. N.A. 32.8 32.1 24.6 19.3 9.8 Alaska N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. Arizona N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. 24.6 20.4 Arkansas N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. 28.1 24.8 11.3 California N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. 11.2 3.6 Colorado N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. 21.2 26.0 Connecticut N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. 0.5 5.7 15.7 38.8 Delaware N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. Dist. of Columbia N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. Florida 15.0 16.7 16.4 14.8 15.1 14.2 14.4 11.4 Georgia N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. 13.7 14.0 11.7 Hawaii N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. 5.0 Idaho N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. 4.9 Illinois
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/lcom0202.pdf
    • 14.5% 9.5% 13,916,596 13.5 9.0 12,347,623 11.9 8.8 12,926,647 12.5 11.5 11,440,264 11.1 10.1 9,885,363 9.6 8.7 6,604,080 6.4 7.6 4,448,655 4.3 6.0 3,824,159 3.7 5.6 3,865,944 3.7 4.5 10 2,910,477 2.8 4.3 11 2,614,329 2.5 3.7 12 1,398,600 1.4 3.2 13 762,738 0.7 2.6 14 630,526 0.6 1.6 15 306,073 0.3 1.0 16 247,495 0.2 0.8 17 166,946 0.2 0.5 18 111,027 0.1 0.5 > 18 10,121 0.0 0.6 1/ Data for June 2000 have been revised. Source: Demographic Power Pack, Current Year Update (2000), MapInfo Corporation. Households in Zip Codes with Competitive Local Exchange Carriers June 2001 8 9 3 4 7 5 6 2 0 1 Households 11,917,810 9,868,758 9,263,142 9,049,456 10,404,061 9,013,244 7,817,760 6,237,933 Percentage Number of
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/lcom0702.pdf
    • been revised. Households Percentage 12,210,584 11.8% 8.8% 10,966,988 10.6 8.5 10,963,681 10.6 9.7 12,043,438 11.6 10.8 11,641,715 11.3 9.7 9,661,002 9.3 8.8 7,469,060 7.2 8.0 6,357,600 6.1 6.7 5,036,094 4.9 5.3 4,374,933 4.2 5.3 10 3,723,246 3.6 5.1 11 2,746,611 2.7 4.2 12 1,887,753 1.8 2.8 13 1,261,606 1.2 1.7 14 926,620 0.9 1.1 15 695,625 0.7 0.9 16 501,645 0.5 0.5 17 368,193 0.4 0.5 18 182,488 0.2 0.4 > 18 359,785 0.3 1.1 1/ Data for December 2000 have been revised. Source: Demographic Power Pack, Current Year Update (2000), MapInfo Corporation. 558,992 474,601 463,526 1,120,610 2,895,955 1,756,886 1,164,518 912,240 5,480,749 5,519,918 5,248,181 4,318,660 Percentage Number of CLECs with Competitive Local Exchange Carriers Table 12 Percentage of Zip Codes December
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/lcom0800.pdf
    • Michigan 13 3,512,813 4.4 9,863,775 0.36 Minnesota 13 1,550,411 1.9 4,775,508 0.32 Mississippi 6 673,355 0.8 2,768,619 0.24 Missouri 10 1,855,452 2.3 5,468,338 0.34 Montana * * * 882,779 * Nebraska 4 576,296 0.7 1,666,028 0.35 Nevada 7 750,335 0.9 1,809,253 0.41 New Hampshire 6 280,508 0.4 1,201,134 0.23 New Jersey 5 2,289,181 2.9 8,143,412 0.28 New Mexico 6 363,827 0.5 1,739,844 0.21 New York 7 4,833,816 6.1 18,196,601 0.27 North Carolina 11 2,536,068 3.2 7,650,789 0.33 North Dakota * * * 633,666 * Ohio 12 3,237,786 4.1 11,256,654 0.29 Oklahoma 9 826,637 1.0 3,358,044 0.25 Oregon 7 914,848 1.1 3,316,154 0.28 Pennsylvania 12 2,767,474 3.5 11,994,016 0.23 Puerto Rico * * * 3,889,507 * Rhode Island 6 279,304 0.4 990,819
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/lcom1200.pdf
    • 0.27 Arizona 11 1,624,668 1.8 4,778 0.34 Arkansas 5 715,467 0.8 2,551 0.28 California 12 12,283,369 13.6 33,145 0.37 Colorado 8 1,654,989 1.8 4,056 0.41 Connecticut 6 1,136,618 1.3 3,282 0.35 Delaware 6 275,219 0.3 754 0.37 District of Columbia 5 333,815 0.4 519 0.64 Florida 11 4,983,478 5.5 15,111 0.33 Georgia 13 2,687,238 3.0 7,788 0.35 Hawaii 7 454,364 0.5 1,185 0.38 Idaho 4 296,066 0.3 1,252 0.24 Illinois 12 4,309,660 4.8 12,128 0.36 Indiana 11 1,717,378 1.9 5,943 0.29 Iowa 6 975,629 1.1 2,869 0.34 Kansas 9 724,024 0.8 2,654 0.27 Kentucky 15 999,544 1.1 3,961 0.25 Louisiana 11 1,294,693 1.4 4,372 0.30 Maine 5 283,640 0.3 1,253 0.23 Maryland 7 2,013,058 2.2 5,172 0.39 Massachusetts 7 2,228,169 2.5
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/lcom1202.pdf
    • 10.1 10.3 9,885,363 9.6 8.7 9.0 6,604,080 6.4 7.6 8.4 4,448,655 4.3 6.0 7.6 3,824,159 3.7 5.6 6.0 3,865,944 3.7 4.5 4.6 10 2,910,477 2.8 4.3 5.3 11 2,614,329 2.5 3.7 4.3 12 1,398,600 1.4 3.2 3.3 13 762,738 0.7 2.6 2.6 14 630,526 0.6 1.6 1.1 15 306,073 0.3 1.0 1.0 16 247,495 0.2 0.8 0.6 17 166,946 0.2 0.5 0.6 18 111,027 0.1 0.5 0.4 > 18 10,121 0.0 0.6 0.6 Source: Demographic Power Pack, Current Year Update (2000), MapInfo Corporation. 8 9 3 4 7 5 6 0 1 Households 11,917,810 9,263,142 9,049,456 2 Number of CLECs 10,404,061 9,013,244 7,817,760 6,237,933 June 2000 June 2000 June 2001 June 2001 8 9 10 or More Number of CLECs 0
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/lcomp98.pdf
    • 33.0 21,312.4 99.2 0.6 0.2 Total per minute access charges 21,218.6 154.0 50.1 21,422.7 99.0 0.7 0.2 24Local private line & special access 3,907.8 615.9 18.4 4,542.1 86.0 13.6 0.4 25Pay telephone compensation from toll carriers 143.4 6.6 152.2 302.2 47.5 2.2 50.4 26Other local telecommunications service revenues 153.9 91.9 17.1 262.9 58.5 35.0 6.5 27Universal service support receipts 1,142.7 0.5 0.7 1,143.9 99.9 0.0 0.1 Total fixed local service provided for resale 26,937.3 924.8 260.1 28,122.2 95.8 3.3 0.9 Mobile service: 28Wireless telephony, paging messaging, and other mobile 230.3 2.1 2,503.8 2,736.2 8.4 0.1 91.5 service monthly, activation, and message charges except toll Total mobile service provided for resale 230.3 2.1 2,503.8 2,736.2 8.4 0.1 91.5 Toll service: 29Operator and
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/lcomp99-1.pdf
    • Service Worksheets TRS Worksheet Data: *** Revenues reported by service providers that filed TRS Worksheets but not Universal Service Worksheets: Per minute access 349.8 16.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 21.1 386.9 90.4 4.1 Other local service revenue 143.5 33.2 4.1 6.3 0.9 20.5 208.5 68.8 15.9 Local service revenue 493.3 49.2 4.1 6.3 0.9 41.7 595.4 82.9 8.3 Mobile service revenue 0.5 0.0 0.3 131.6 57.0 0.0 189.4 0.3 0.0 Toll service revenue 26.6 0.8 56.3 2.6 23.1 1,423.1 1,532.4 1.7 0.1 Total telecommunications revenue 520.4 50.0 60.6 140.4 81.0 1,464.8 2,317.2 22.5 2.2 not included on Universal Service Worksheets USF and TRS worksheet data combined: ** Per minute access 18,231.6 379.8 0.0 26.0 0.2 198.418,836.0 96.8 2.0 Other local service revenue
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ldrpt103.pdf
    • 2001 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 Long Distance Carriers Only Carrier's Carrier Services: Operator Services 0.7 0.3 0.3 0.7 1.1 5,807 3,422 2,771 4,366 6,859 Ordinary Long Distance and Other Switched 6.9 8.4 9.4 13.9 12.0 1,702 2,271 1,692 1,218 1,015 Private Line 1.2 1.9 2.1 5.2 4.7 3,111 2,275 1,589 3,469 2,403 Other Toll Revenues 2 1.8 1.7 2.3 0.5 0.4 All Toll Revenues Provided for Resale 10.6 12.3 14.0 20.3 18.1 1,270 1,675 1,225 1,359 1,044 End-User Services: Prepaid Card 0.9 1.2 1.3 1.2 0.9 1,725 1,526 1,098 1,105 1,176 Operator Services 9.2 8.9 6.5 8.0 7.0 3,859 3,537 2,688 3,580 2,999 Ordinary Long Distance and Other Switched 52.5 56.1 59.6 53.0 45.5 3,387 3,225 3,260 2,781 2,832 Private
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/mksh3q98.pdf
    • SPRINT WORLDCOM ALL OTHER LONG DISTANCE CARRIERS HERFINDAHL- HIRSCHMAN INDEX (HHI) * 1984 90.1% 4.5% 2.7% 2.6% 8,155 1985 86.3 5.5 2.6 5.6 7,479 1986 81.9 7.6 4.3 6.3 6,783 1987 78.6 8.8 5.8 6.8 6,298 1988 74.6 10.3 7.2 8.0 5,720 1989 67.5 12.1 8.4 0.2% 11.8 4,778 1990 65.0 14.2 9.7 0.3 10.8 4,527 1991 63.2 15.2 9.9 0.5 11.3 4,321 1992 60.8 16.7 9.7 1.4 11.5 4,074 1993 58.1 17.8 10.0 1.9 12.3 3,795 1994 55.2 17.4 10.1 3.3 14.0 3,466 1995 51.8 19.7 9.8 4.9 13.8 3,197 1996 47.9 20.0 9.7 5.5 17.0 2,823 1997 44.5 19.4 9.7 6.7 19.8 2,508 * FCC estimate. TOTAL OPERATING REVENUES OF LONG DISTANCE CARRIERS 0 10 20 30 40 50
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/mksh4q98.pdf
    • SPRINT WORLDCOM ALL OTHER LONG DISTANCE CARRIERS HERFINDAHL- HIRSCHMAN INDEX (HHI) * 1984 90.1% 4.5% 2.7% 2.6% 8,155 1985 86.3 5.5 2.6 5.6 7,479 1986 81.9 7.6 4.3 6.3 6,783 1987 78.6 8.8 5.8 6.8 6,298 1988 74.6 10.3 7.2 8.0 5,720 1989 67.5 12.1 8.4 0.2% 11.8 4,778 1990 65.0 14.2 9.7 0.3 10.8 4,527 1991 63.2 15.2 9.9 0.5 11.3 4,321 1992 60.8 16.7 9.7 1.4 11.5 4,074 1993 58.1 17.8 10.0 1.9 12.3 3,795 1994 55.2 17.4 10.1 3.3 14.0 3,466 1995 51.8 19.7 9.8 4.9 13.8 3,197 1996 47.9 20.0 9.7 5.5 17.0 2,823 1997 44.5 19.4 9.7 6.7 19.8 2,508 * FCC estimate. TOTAL OPERATING REVENUES OF LONG DISTANCE CARRIERS 0 10 20 30 40 50
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/quarterly_roll-upsasof110110.pdf
    • Local Competitors 1,323.2 3,249.6 976.9 1,121.9 14.8 1,085.6 3.5 Fixed Local Service Providers 9,515.7 22,608.1 4,894.8 4,951.2 1.2 4,844.7 2.2 Payphone Service Providers 52.1 143.4 10.5 10.5 0.3 10.0 4.6 Wireless Telephony Including Cellular, 2,090.0 19,824.0 3,006.3 4,231.5 40.8 4,111.9 2.8 Personal Communications Service (PCS) and SMR Telephony Carriers Paging & Messaging Service Providers 63.1 190.4 28.2 37.5 32.7 37.0 0.5 Specialized Mobile Radio (SMR) Dispatch * 54.9 4.7 4.5 -4.7 4.4 2.9 Wireless Data and Other Mobile Service 56.7 168.4 41.5 41.1 -0.8 39.7 3.5 Providers Wireless Service Providers 2,209.9 20,237.7 3,080.7 4,314.6 40.1 4,192.9 2.8 Interexchange Carriers (IXCs) 3,644.8 14,092.1 9,538.7 8,798.8 -7.8 8,376.7 4.3 Operator Service Providers (OSPs) 11.6 139.2 59.2 50.5 -14.7 44.8 11.7 Prepaid Calling Card
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/quarterly_roll-upsasof110110.pdf
    • 24.5 0.3 Providers Wireless Service Providers 1,608.5 23,834.5 5,553.3 6,065.6 9.2 5,931.8 2.2 Interexchange Carriers (IXCs) 3,108.2 8,565.4 5,789.2 5,310.9 -8.3 5,180.6 2.5 Operator Service Providers (OSPs) 319.4 435.8 288.0 334.6 16.2 318.4 4.8 Prepaid Calling Card Providers 20.8 251.7 222.9 233.3 4.7 225.5 3.4 Satellite Service Providers 35.8 69.9 66.0 67.0 1.5 66.9 0.1 Toll Resellers 483.7 2,780.8 1,726.0 2,000.5 15.9 1,901.6 4.9 Other Toll Carriers 8/ 637.0 143.8 100.4 81.8 -18.5 72.6 11.2 Toll Service Providers 4,605.0 12,247.5 8,192.4 8,028.0 -2.0 7,765.6 3.3 All Filers 7/ $15,674.1 $56,795.1 $19,109.5 $19,421.4 1.6%$18,785.0 3.3% See notes at end of tables. Last updated April 31, 2005 Annualized Change -- Rollup of May 1, 2005 FCC Form 499-Q Filings Detailed Revenues by Type
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref02.pdf
    • 1963 1964 1965 Appendix A Long-Term Trends - Continued Consumer Personal Consumption Price Indices Expenditures 1982-1984 = 100 (Billions) Telephone Telephone Service Telephone as All Items Service Without FET Total Telephone % of Total 17.5 17.7 17.4 17.1 17.1 37.3 37.3 $77.3 $0.6 0.78% 16.7 37.5 37.5 69.9 0.6 0.86% 15.2 37.6 37.6 60.5 0.6 0.99% 13.7 37.7 37.7 48.6 0.5 1.03% 13.0 37.5 36.8 45.8 0.4 0.87% 13.4 37.0 36.2 51.4 0.4 0.78% 13.7 36.8 36.0 55.8 0.5 0.90% 13.9 36.6 35.8 62.0 0.5 0.81% 14.4 36.1 35.3 66.7 0.5 0.75% 14.1 36.1 35.3 64.1 0.5 0.78% 13.9 36.1 35.3 67.0 0.6 0.90% 14.0 36.1 35.3 71.0 0.6 0.85% 14.7 36.3 35.4 80.8 0.7 0.87% 16.3 38.3 36.0 88.6 0.8
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref98.pdf
    • 103 Appendix A Long Term Trends Consumer Personal Consumption Price Indices Expenditures (billions) Telephone Telephone Service Telephone as All Items Service Without FET TotalTelephone% of Total 1925 17.5 1926 17.7 1927 17.4 1928 17.1 1929 17.1 37.3 37.3 $77.3 $0.6 0.78% 1930 16.7 37.5 37.5 69.9 0.6 0.86% 1931 15.2 37.6 37.6 60.5 0.6 0.99% 1932 13.7 37.7 37.7 48.6 0.5 1.03% 1933 13.0 37.5 36.8 45.8 0.4 0.87% 1934 13.4 37.0 36.2 51.4 0.4 0.78% 1935 13.7 36.8 36.0 55.8 0.5 0.90% 1936 13.9 36.6 35.8 62.0 0.5 0.81% 1937 14.4 36.1 35.3 66.7 0.5 0.75% 1938 14.1 36.1 35.3 64.1 0.5 0.78% 1939 13.9 36.1 35.3 67.0 0.6 0.90% 1940 14.0 36.1 35.3 71.0 0.6 0.85% 1941 14.7 36.3
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref99.pdf
    • Appendix A Long Term Trends Consumer Personal Consumption Price Indices Expenditures (billions) Telephone Telephone Service Telephone as All Items Service Without FET TotalTelephone % of Total 1925 17.5 1926 17.7 1927 17.4 1928 17.1 1929 17.1 37.3 37.3 $77.3 $0.6 0.78% 1930 16.7 37.5 37.5 69.9 0.6 0.86% 1931 15.2 37.6 37.6 60.5 0.6 0.99% 1932 13.7 37.7 37.7 48.6 0.5 1.03% 1933 13.0 37.5 36.8 45.8 0.4 0.87% 1934 13.4 37.0 36.2 51.4 0.4 0.78% 1935 13.7 36.8 36.0 55.8 0.5 0.90% 1936 13.9 36.6 35.8 62.0 0.5 0.81% 1937 14.4 36.1 35.3 66.7 0.5 0.75% 1938 14.1 36.1 35.3 64.1 0.5 0.78% 1939 13.9 36.1 35.3 67.0 0.6 0.90% 1940 14.0 36.1 35.3 71.0 0.6 0.85% 1941 14.7 36.3
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/subs0300.pdf
    • Louisiana 88.9 90.8 1.9 Maine 90.7 98.5 7.8 * Maryland 96.3 96.3 0.0 Massachusetts 94.3 94.1 -0.2 Michigan 93.8 95.9 2.1 * Minnesota 96.4 97.8 1.5 Mississippi 82.4 88.8 6.4 * Missouri 92.1 95.7 3.6 * Montana 92.8 95.1 2.3 Nebraska 94.0 97.8 3.8 * Nevada 89.4 95.5 6.1 * New Hampshire 95.0 98.1 3.2 * New Jersey 94.1 94.6 0.5 New Mexico 85.3 92.2 6.9 * New York 90.8 96.3 5.5 * North Carolina 89.3 93.3 4.0 * North Dakota 95.1 94.8 -0.3 Ohio 92.2 94.7 2.5 * Oklahoma 91.5 90.5 -1.0 Oregon 91.2 94.0 2.8 Pennsylvania 95.1 97.4 2.3 * Rhode Island 93.3 95.1 1.8 South Carolina 81.8 94.2 12.4 * South Dakota 92.7 95.5 2.8 Tennessee 87.6 96.3
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/subs0305.pdf
    • Subscribership in the United States 6 Chart 1 85 90 95 100 Month (March, July, November) Percent with Telephone N83 M84J84N84 M85J85N85M86J86N86M87J87N87M88J88N88M89J89N89M90J90N90M91J91N91M92J92N92M93J93N93M94J94N94M95J95N95M96J96N96M97J97N97M98J98N98M99J99N99M00J00N00M01J01N01M02J02N02M03J03N03M04J04N04M05 In Housing Unit Available Telephone Penetration Households 7 Table 2 Telephone Penetration by State (Percentage of Households with Telephone Service) State Alabama 87.9% 90.6% 2.7% Alaska 83.8 95.2 11.4 * Arizona 88.8 93.0 4.3 * Arkansas 88.2 87.7 -0.5 California 91.7 94.5 2.8 * Colorado 94.4 95.0 0.6 Connecticut 95.5 92.7 -2.8 Delaware 95.0 90.7 -4.3 District of Columbia 94.7 91.2 -3.5 Florida 85.5 91.6 6.1 * Georgia 88.9 90.4 1.5 Hawaii 94.6 95.2 0.6 Idaho 89.5 94.8 5.3 * Illinois 95.0 89.1 -5.9 Indiana 90.3 91.4 1.1 Iowa 95.4 96.3 0.9 Kansas 94.9 93.5 -1.4 Kentucky 86.9 90.1
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/subs0398.pdf
    • Month (March, July, November) Percent with Telephone N83M84J84N84M85J85N85M86J86N86M87J87N87M88J88N88M89J89N89M90J90N90M91J91N91M92J92N92M93J93N93M94J94N94M95J95N95M96J96N96M97J97N97M98 In Housing Unit Available Telephone Penetration Households 6 Table 2 Telephone Penetration by State (Percentage of Households with Telephone Service) State November 1983 March 1998 Change Alabama 87.9% 93.5% 5.6% * Alaska 83.8 92.3 8.5 * Arizona 88.8 91.9 3.1 Arkansas 88.2 86.6 -1.5 California 91.7 94.9 3.2 * Colorado 94.4 93.9 -0.5 Connecticut 95.5 92.7 -2.8 ** Delaware 95.0 97.2 2.2 District of Columbia 94.7 91.6 -3.1 Florida 85.5 93.3 7.8 * Georgia 88.9 89.9 1.0 Hawaii 94.6 95.1 0.6 Idaho 89.5 92.7 3.3 Illinois 95.0 92.7 -2.3 ** Indiana 90.3 93.8 3.4 * Iowa 95.4 96.6 1.2 Kansas 94.9 95.4 0.5 Kentucky 86.9 94.1 7.2 * Louisiana 88.9 93.5 4.6 *
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/subs0399.pdf
    • 98.2 3.1 District of Columbia 94.7 92.3 -2.4 Florida 85.5 92.6 7.1 * Georgia 88.9 92.3 3.4 Hawaii 94.6 95.6 1.0 Idaho 89.5 93.6 4.1 Illinois 95.0 91.2 -3.8 ** Indiana 90.3 93.8 3.4 * Iowa 95.4 96.1 0.7 Kansas 94.9 97.1 2.2 Kentucky 86.9 93.5 6.6 * Louisiana 88.9 90.3 1.4 Maine 90.7 97.5 6.8 * Maryland 96.3 96.8 0.5 Massachusetts 94.3 95.4 1.1 Michigan 93.8 94.0 0.2 Minnesota 96.4 95.9 -0.4 Mississippi 82.4 87.1 4.7 Missouri 92.1 94.6 2.5 Montana 92.8 95.4 2.7 Nebraska 94.0 94.8 0.8 Nevada 89.4 93.4 4.0 New Hampshire 95.0 95.8 0.8 New Jersey 94.1 95.0 0.9 New Mexico 85.3 90.0 4.7 New York 90.8 95.2 4.3 * North Carolina 89.3 93.3 3.9 North Dakota
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/subs0701.pdf
    • 3.3 California 91.7 97.0 5.3 * Colorado 94.4 97.4 3.0 * Connecticut 95.5 96.8 1.3 Delaware 95.0 94.4 -0.6 District of Columbia 94.7 93.8 -0.9 Florida 85.5 93.2 7.7 * Georgia 88.9 93.2 4.3 * Hawaii 94.6 96.9 2.3 Idaho 89.5 94.1 4.6 * Illinois 95.0 93.7 -1.3 Indiana 90.3 95.0 4.7 * Iowa 95.4 97.2 1.8 Kansas 94.9 95.4 0.5 Kentucky 86.9 93.7 6.8 * Louisiana 88.9 94.5 5.6 * Maine 90.7 97.7 7.0 * Maryland 96.3 95.5 -0.8 Massachusetts 94.3 95.7 1.4 Michigan 93.8 94.7 0.9 Minnesota 96.4 97.7 1.4 Mississippi 82.4 88.1 5.7 * Missouri 92.1 96.6 4.5 * Montana 92.8 94.8 2.0 Nebraska 94.0 96.5 2.5 * Nevada 89.4 95.2 5.8 * New Hampshire 95.0 97.8 2.8
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/subs0702.pdf
    • Pennsylvania 95.1 98.2 3.1 * Rhode Island 93.3 96.6 3.3 South Carolina 81.8 95.9 14.1 * South Dakota 92.7 95.3 2.6 Tennessee 87.6 93.1 5.5 * Texas 89.0 93.3 4.3 * Utah 90.3 96.7 6.4 * Vermont 92.7 97.3 4.6 * Virginia 93.1 96.6 3.5 * Washington 92.5 96.8 4.3 * West Virginia 88.1 94.3 6.2 * Wisconsin 94.8 95.3 0.5 Wyoming 89.7 95.2 5.5 * Total United States 91.4 95.1 3.7 * * Increase is statistically significant at the 95% confidence level. Decrease is statistically significant at the 95% confidence level. Differences may not appear to equal changes due to rounding. November 1983 July 2002 Change 8 Chart 2 9 94.0% or less 94.1% - 96.1% 96.2% or more July
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/subs0704.pdf
    • 0.0 Nebraska 94.0 96.5 2.5 * Nevada 89.4 90.9 1.5 New Hampshire 95.0 97.5 2.5 New Jersey 94.1 94.3 0.2 New Mexico 85.3 91.5 6.2 * New York 90.8 94.3 3.5 * North Carolina 89.3 93.5 4.2 * North Dakota 95.1 94.4 -0.7 Ohio 92.2 96.1 3.9 * Oklahoma 91.5 88.7 -2.8 Oregon 91.2 96.1 4.9 * Pennsylvania 95.1 95.6 0.5 Rhode Island 93.3 96.0 2.7 South Carolina 81.8 93.3 11.5 * South Dakota 92.7 92.1 -0.6 Tennessee 87.6 94.0 6.4 * Texas 89.0 92.8 3.8 * Utah 90.3 95.7 5.4 * Vermont 92.7 96.0 3.3 Virginia 93.1 94.5 1.4 Washington 92.5 95.3 2.8 * West Virginia 88.1 92.6 4.5 * Wisconsin 94.8 95.9 1.1 Wyoming 89.7 94.6 4.9 * Total
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/subs0798.pdf
    • Dakota 95.1 96.5 1.4 Ohio 92.2 95.4 3.2 * Oklahoma 91.5 91.5 -0.0 Oregon 91.2 96.8 5.6 * Pennsylvania 95.1 95.9 0.8 Rhode Island 93.3 95.1 1.8 South Carolina 81.8 92.2 10.4 * South Dakota 92.7 93.1 0.4 Tennessee 87.6 95.1 7.5 * Texas 89.0 91.8 2.8 * Utah 90.3 97.4 7.1 * Vermont 92.7 94.9 2.2 Virginia 93.1 93.6 0.5 Washington 92.5 95.5 3.1 West Virginia 88.1 93.8 5.7 * Wisconsin 94.8 97.0 2.2 Wyoming 89.7 94.8 5.1 * Total United States 91.4 94.1 2.7 * * Increase is statistically significant at the 95% confidence level. ** Decrease is statistically significant at the 95% confidence level. Differences may not appear to equal changes due to rounding. 7 Chart 2 8
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/subs0799.pdf
    • 93.3 7.8 * Georgia 88.9 91.2 2.3 Hawaii 94.6 97.4 2.8 * Idaho 89.5 95.1 5.6 * Illinois 95.0 91.7 -3.3 ** Indiana 90.3 93.7 3.4 Iowa 95.4 96.3 0.9 Kansas 94.9 92.1 -2.8 ** Kentucky 86.9 93.3 6.4 * Louisiana 88.9 92.2 3.3 Maine 90.7 96.9 6.2 * Maryland 96.3 94.1 -2.2 Massachusetts 94.3 94.7 0.4 Michigan 93.8 94.3 0.5 Minnesota 96.4 97.5 1.2 Mississippi 82.4 89.1 6.7 * Missouri 92.1 97.1 5.0 * Montana 92.8 95.4 2.6 Nebraska 94.0 97.0 3.0 Nevada 89.4 94.9 5.5 * New Hampshire 95.0 97.9 3.0 New Jersey 94.1 92.4 -1.7 New Mexico 85.3 90.9 5.6 New York 90.8 95.4 4.6 * North Carolina 89.3 94.3 5.0 * North Dakota 95.1 98.9 3.8 Ohio
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/subs1100.pdf
    • 92.5 95.8 3.4 * Colorado 93.2 96.3 3.0 * Connecticut 95.5 96.4 0.9 Delaware 94.3 96.3 2.0 * District of Columbia 94.9 93.2 -1.7 Florida 88.7 92.1 3.4 * Georgia 86.2 91.1 4.9 * Hawaii 93.5 94.7 1.2 Idaho 90.7 93.9 3.2 * Illinois 94.2 91.5 -2.6 # Indiana 91.6 94.5 2.9 * Iowa 96.2 96.2 0.0 Kansas 94.3 94.8 0.5 Kentucky 88.1 93.3 5.2 * Louisiana 89.7 92.6 2.9 * Maine 93.4 97.9 4.4 * Maryland 95.7 95.0 -0.7 Massachusetts 95.9 94.6 -1.3 # Michigan 92.8 95.0 2.1 * Minnesota 95.8 97.4 1.6 * Mississippi 82.4 89.2 6.8 * Missouri 91.5 95.8 4.3 * Montana 91.0 94.6 3.6 * Nebraska 95.7 97.3 1.7 * Nevada 90.4 94.0 3.6 * New
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/subs1101.pdf
    • Pennsylvania 94.9 97.0 2.2 * Rhode Island 93.6 96.3 2.7 * South Carolina 83.7 94.5 10.8 * South Dakota 93.2 95.1 1.9 Tennessee 88.5 93.2 4.7 * Texas 88.4 93.8 5.4 * Utah 92.5 96.6 4.0 * Vermont 92.3 97.2 4.9 * Virginia 93.1 94.7 1.6 Washington 93.0 96.0 3.0 * West Virginia 87.7 93.5 5.8 * Wisconsin 95.2 95.8 0.5 Wyoming 89.9 93.8 3.9 * Total United States 91.6 94.9 3.3 * * Increase is statistically significant at the 95% confidence level. # Decrease is statistically significant at the 95% confidence level. Differences may not appear to equal changes due to rounding. 8 Chart 2 9 93.8% or less93.9% - 95.9%96.0% or more Average 2001 Telephone Penetration Chart 3 10
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/subs1103.pdf
    • 96.9 1.0 Mississippi 82.4 91.7 9.3 * Missouri 91.5 95.9 4.4 * Montana 91.0 93.2 2.3 * Nebraska 95.7 96.0 0.3 Nevada 90.4 94.5 4.1 * New Hampshire 94.3 97.6 3.3 * New Jersey 94.8 96.3 1.5 * New Mexico 82.0 91.7 9.6 * New York 91.8 95.2 3.4 * North Carolina 88.3 94.1 5.8 * North Dakota 94.6 94.1 -0.5 Ohio 92.4 96.3 3.8 * Oklahoma 90.3 91.6 1.3 Oregon 90.6 96.5 5.9 * Pennsylvania 94.9 97.0 2.2 * Rhode Island 93.6 96.9 3.3 * South Carolina 83.7 93.2 9.6 * South Dakota 93.2 94.1 0.9 Tennessee 88.5 94.2 5.7 * Texas 88.4 93.6 5.2 * Utah 92.5 97.1 4.5 * Vermont 92.3 97.0 4.8 * Virginia 93.1 95.5 2.4
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/subs1104.pdf
    • # Florida 88.7 93.4 4.7 * Georgia 86.2 91.2 5.0 * Hawaii 93.5 95.4 1.8 * Idaho 90.7 94.8 4.1 * Illinois 94.2 90.1 -4.1 # Indiana 91.6 91.8 0.3 Iowa 96.2 95.4 -0.8 Kansas 94.3 94.8 0.4 Kentucky 88.1 91.4 3.3 * Louisiana 89.7 90.9 1.3 Maine 93.4 96.6 3.2 * Maryland 95.7 93.4 -2.3 # Massachusetts 95.9 96.4 0.5 Michigan 92.8 93.7 0.9 Minnesota 95.8 97.1 1.3 Mississippi 82.4 89.6 7.2 * Missouri 91.5 93.7 2.2 * Montana 91.0 93.5 2.5 * Nebraska 95.7 95.7 0.0 Nevada 90.4 92.2 1.8 New Hampshire 94.3 96.4 2.1 * New Jersey 94.8 95.1 0.3 New Mexico 82.0 91.4 9.4 * New York 91.8 94.5 2.7 * North Carolina 88.3 93.3 5.0 *
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/subs1197.pdf
    • 86.6 89.8 3.2 California 92.5 94.3 1.8 * Colorado 93.2 95.9 2.6 * Connecticut 95.5 94.2 -1.3 Delaware 94.3 95.7 1.5 District of Columbia 94.9 90.8 -4.1 ** Florida 88.7 92.8 4.1 * Georgia 86.2 92.0 5.8 * Hawaii 93.5 94.5 0.9 Idaho 90.7 94.0 3.3 * Illinois 94.2 92.2 -2.0 ** Indiana 91.6 93.8 2.2 * Iowa 96.2 96.7 0.5 Kansas 94.3 94.0 -0.4 Kentucky 88.1 93.2 5.0 * Louisiana 89.7 91.0 1.4 Maine 93.4 96.1 2.7 * Maryland 95.7 95.7 0.0 Massachusetts 95.9 95.4 -0.5 Michigan 92.8 94.3 1.4 Minnesota 95.8 96.9 1.1 Mississippi 82.4 89.2 6.8 * Missouri 91.5 95.0 3.6 * Montana 91.0 93.7 2.7 Nebraska 95.7 97.1 1.4 Nevada 90.4 94.1 3.8 * New Hampshire 94.3
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/subs1198.pdf
    • 88.0 1.4 California 92.5 95.2 2.7 * Colorado 93.2 95.0 1.8 Connecticut 95.5 95.5 -0.0 Delaware 94.3 96.7 2.4 * District of Columbia 94.9 91.0 -3.9 ** Florida 88.7 92.6 3.9 * Georgia 86.2 91.4 5.3 * Hawaii 93.5 95.4 1.9 * Idaho 90.7 93.3 2.6 * Illinois 94.2 92.7 -1.4 ** Indiana 91.6 94.4 2.8 * Iowa 96.2 96.7 0.5 Kansas 94.3 94.3 0.0 Kentucky 88.1 93.3 5.2 * Louisiana 89.7 92.3 2.6 * Maine 93.4 96.9 3.5 * Maryland 95.7 96.5 0.8 Massachusetts 95.9 94.5 -1.4 Michigan 92.8 95.0 2.1 * Minnesota 95.8 97.8 2.0 * Mississippi 82.4 89.5 7.1 * Missouri 91.5 94.6 3.1 * Montana 91.0 94.1 3.1 * Nebraska 95.7 96.2 0.5 Nevada 90.4 92.3 2.0
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/subs1199.pdf
    • 95.7 3.3 * Colorado 93.2 96.7 3.5 * Connecticut 95.5 96.5 1.0 Delaware 94.3 95.7 1.5 District of Columbia 94.9 92.4 -2.5 ** Florida 88.7 92.6 3.9 * Georgia 86.2 92.1 5.9 * Hawaii 93.5 96.3 2.8 * Idaho 90.7 93.8 3.1 * Illinois 94.2 91.8 -2.4 ** Indiana 91.6 93.8 2.3 * Iowa 96.2 95.8 -0.4 Kansas 94.3 93.8 -0.5 Kentucky 88.1 92.8 4.6 * Louisiana 89.7 91.5 1.9 Maine 93.4 97.2 3.8 * Maryland 95.7 95.3 -0.4 Massachusetts 95.9 95.4 -0.5 Michigan 92.8 94.2 1.3 Minnesota 95.8 96.9 1.1 Mississippi 82.4 88.0 5.6 * Missouri 91.5 95.6 4.1 * Montana 91.0 95.3 4.3 * Nebraska 95.7 95.9 0.2 Nevada 90.4 93.1 2.8 New Hampshire 94.3 97.0 2.7 * New
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/telrev-98.pdf
    • terminating calls 23a Provided as unbundled network elements or other 174.8 174.8 249.6 249.6 * * 424.4 424.4 contract arrangement 23b Provided under state or federal access tariff 8,358.8 9,348.217,707.0 70.6 43.6 114.2 8,429.4 9,391.717,821.2 Total per-minute access charges 8,533.6 9,348.217,881.8 320.2 43.6 363.8 * * 8,853.9 9,391.718,245.6 24Local private line & special access 717.4 4,369.8 5,087.2 426.8 288.5 715.3 0.5 0.3 0.8 1,144.8 4,658.6 5,803.3 25Pay telephone compensation from toll carriers 120.2 154.9 275.0 4.5 5.0 9.5 77.3 60.0 137.2 201.9 219.8 421.8 26Other local telecommunications service revenues 253.2 48.1 301.3 90.3 22.2 112.5 343.5 70.3 413.8 27Universal service support receipts 377.6 1,016.7 1,394.3 1.7 3.1 4.7 379.3 1,019.7 1,399.0 Total fixed local service provided for resale 11,159.116,254.027,413.0 965.9 385.5
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/telrev01.pdf
    • 3.2 1,167 1,127 3.5 Total Fixed Local Service Providers 4,895 4,945 4,951 4,845 2.2 4,956 4,844 2.2 Payphone Service Providers 10 13 11 10 4.5 11 10 4.6 Wireless Telephony Including Cellular, Personal Communications Service (PCS) and SMR Telephony Carriers 3,006 4,455 4,231 4,112 2.8 4,510 4,383 2.8 Paging & Messaging Service Providers 28 34 37 37 1.3 37 37 0.5 Specialized Mobile Radio (SMR) Dispatch 5 5 5 4 2.9 5 4 2.9 Wireless Data and Other Mobile Service Providers 41 41 41 40 3.5 42 41 3.5 Total Wireless Service Providers 3,081 4,534 4,315 4,193 2.8 4,594 4,465 2.8 Interexchange Carriers (IXCs) 9,539 8,787 8,799 8,377 4.8 8,494 8,129 4.3 Operator Service Providers (OSPs) 59 49 51 45 11.3
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/telrev02.pdf
    • 13.5 13.1 -2.6 12.7 -3.0 Wireless Data and Other Mobile Service Providers 1.1 18.2 11.1 10.5 -5.4 10.2 -2.6 Wireless Service Providers 1,301.1 22,008.1 5,090.6 5,306.6 4.2 5,149.8 -3.0 Interexchange Carriers (IXCs) 3,405.5 12,126.0 8,117.1 7,407.4 -8.7 7,100.8 -4.1 Operator Service Providers (OSPs) 9.9 121.0 47.1 42.8 -9.0 36.9 -13.8 Prepaid Calling Card Providers 5.6 164.0 143.4 146.4 2.1 145.8 -0.5 Satellite Service Providers 31.3 29.8 26.5 24.5 -7.5 24.4 -0.4 Toll Resellers 696.6 2,713.1 1,820.0 1,570.2 -13.7 1,471.3 -6.3 Other Toll Carriers 494.3 107.7 77.8 71.2 -8.5 64.7 -9.2 Toll Service Providers 4,643.2 15,261.5 10,232.0 9,262.6 -9.5 8,843.9 -4.5 All Filers $15,515.1 $59,432.4 $20,760.8$19,898.8 -4.2% $19,180.4 -3.6% Note: Amounts may not add to totals due to rounding. * Denotes values
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/telrev03.pdf
    • in Millions) Data from FCC Form 499-A Cellular, PCS and SMR Wireless Other Wireless Telephony Line Intrastate InterstateInternational Total Intrastate InterstateInternational Total Fixed local service 303Monthly service, local calling, connection charges, vertical features, and other local exchange service including subscriber line and PICC charges to IXCs a Provided as unbundled network elements $1 $1 b Provided under other arrangements 1.3 0.5 * 1.8 Total Line 303 2 1 * 3 304Per-minute charges for originating or terminating calls a Provided under state or federal access tariff 1 1 * 2 b Provided as unbundled network elements or other contract arrangement 40 5 * 45 1 * 1 Total Line 304 40 6 * 46 1 * 1 305Local private line & special
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend100.pdf
    • DECEMBER 31, 1998 LINES TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL (1998 USF SWITCHED SERVICEPERCENT OTHER PERCENTSWITCHED SERVICEPERCENT OTHER PERCENT Loops in LINES RESALE TSR RESALE # OTHER LINES RESALE TSR RESALE # OTHER STATE thousands) + COMPANY(thousands)(thousands) (thousands) (thousands)(thousands) (thousands) Alabama 2,465 BellSouth 1,998 56 2.8% n.a. n.a.% 1,947 39 2.0% n.a. n.a.% Alaska 409 Arizona 2,871 U S WEST 2,772 15 0.5 6 0.2 2,720 11 0.4 5 0.2 Arkansas 1,422 SBC 999 24 2.4 0 0.0 974 18 1.9 0 0.0 California 22,222 GTE 4,723 68 1.4 0 0.0 4,551 40 0.9 0 0.0 SBC 17,999 269 1.5 0 0.0 18,110 261 1.4 0 0.0 Colorado 2,757 U S WEST 2,709 41 1.5 1 *** 2,650 29 1.1 1 *** Connecticut
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend199.pdf
    • * 252 * COLORADO 2,644 U S WEST 2,583 16 0.6 2,554 8 0.3 CONNECTICUT 2,152 SNET 2,137 31 1.5 2,120 28 1.3 DELAWARE 532 Bell Atlantic 557 7 1.3 * * * DIST. OF COLUMBIA 920 Bell Atlantic 935 7 0.7 * 3 * FLORIDA 10,491 BellSouth 6,297 95 1.5 6,231 67 1.1 GTE 2,240 28 1.3 2,232 12 0.5 Sprint 1,983 15 0.8 1,931 9 0.4 GEORGIA 4,770 BellSouth 4,028 89 2.2 4,003 62 1.5 HAWAII 708 GTE 712 ** *** 711 ** *** IDAHO 681 U S WEST 470 ** *** 493 ** *** ILLINOIS 7,981 Ameritech 7,226 201 2.8 6,851 172 2.5 GTE 895 ** *** 882 0 0.0 INDIANA 3,471 Ameritech 2,221 5 0.2 2,167 **
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend200.pdf
    • 0.27 Arizona 8 1,614,082 1.9 4,778 0.34 Arkansas 4 715,467 0.8 2,551 0.28 California 9 12,222,475 14.0 33,145 0.37 Colorado 8 1,654,989 1.9 4,056 0.41 Connecticut 6 1,136,618 1.3 3,282 0.35 Delaware 6 275,219 0.3 754 0.37 District of Columbia 5 333,815 0.4 519 0.64 Florida 10 4,863,185 5.6 15,111 0.32 Georgia 11 2,636,040 3.0 7,788 0.34 Hawaii 7 454,364 0.5 1,185 0.38 Idaho * * * 1,252 * Illinois 11 4,158,088 4.8 12,128 0.34 Indiana 9 1,523,437 1.7 5,943 0.26 Iowa 5 536,718 0.6 2,869 0.19 Kansas 8 708,352 0.8 2,654 0.27 Kentucky 15 999,544 1.1 3,961 0.25 Louisiana 10 1,185,493 1.4 4,372 0.27 Maine 4 189,564 0.2 1,253 0.15 Maryland 6 1,979,823 2.3 5,172 0.38 Massachusetts 7 2,228,169 2.6
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend298.pdf
    • Inc. 160 Conquest Operator Services Corp. 55 Group Totals and Index 721 438 1.6 USLD Communications Corp. 309 GE Exchange 53 Midcom Communications, Inc. 60 Telco Communications Group 370 Group Totals and Index 792 812 1.0 NOS Communications, Inc. 73 Frontier Corporation (Non-LEC Services) 752 IXC Long Distance, Inc. 65 EXCEL Communications, Inc. 613 Group Totals and Index 1,503 2,799 0.5 Unidial 61 Tel-Save, Inc. 125 LCI International, Inc. 571 SPRINT Corporation (Non-LEC Services) 2,065 Cherry Communications, Inc. 88 Group Totals and Index 2,910 9,274 0.3 MCI Communications Corporation 4,364 WorldCom, Inc. 1,241 VarTec Telecom, Inc. 189 AT&T Corp. 5,858 CABLE & WIRELESS PLC 77 Group Totals and Index 11,729 65,367 0.2 12 TABLE 3.2 LOCAL EXCHANGE CARRIERS SERVED WITH MORE
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend299.pdf
    • 0.9 0 0.0 4,498 51 1.1 0 0.0 4,443 39 0.9 4,394 26 0.6 SBC 18,110 261 1.4 0 0.0 17,646 252 1.4 0 0.0 17,792 251 1.4 * 252 * Colorado 2,644 U S WEST 2,650 29 1.1 1 *** 2,556 22 0.8 1 *** 2,583 16 0.6 2,554 8 0.3 Connecticut 2,152 SBC (SNET) 2,148 36 1.7 11 0.5 2,133 34 1.6 15 0.7 2,137 31 1.5 2,120 28 1.3 Delaware 532 Bell Atlantic 569 10 1.8 n.a. n.a. 565 10 1.8 n.a. n.a. 557 7 1.3 * * * District of Columbia 920 Bell Atlantic 945 11 1.2 n.a. n.a. 946 11 1.1 n.a. n.a. 935 7 0.7 * 3 * Florida 10,491 BellSouth 6,487 112 1.7 n.a.
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend502.pdf
    • 15.6 14.6 15.9 6.2 8.0 1982 10.8 9.0 2.7 3.9 4.2 1.7 1983 3.1 0.2 1.4 0.0 7.4 3.9 1984 17.2 10.4 -4.3 -5.1 3.6 3.8 1985 8.9 12.4 -3.7 -3.0 0.6 2.1 1986 7.1 8.9 -9.4 -10.0 0.3 -3.5 1987 3.3 2.6 -12.4 -11.8 -3.0 -3.0 1988 4.5 4.6 -4.2 -2.1 -4.2 -3.8 1989 0.6 1.9 -1.3 -1.7 -2.6 0.5 1990 1.0 1.5 -3.7 -0.1 -2.2 -2.2 1991 5.1 2.1 1.3 -1.3 -1.5 -2.6 1992 0.5 -0.2 -1.3 1.0 -2.4 1.3 1993 1.0 0.8 6.5 3.8 0.2 -1.1 1994 -0.3 0.7 5.4 6.1 -1.0 -1.4 1995 2.6 2/ 0.1 2/ -3.8 2/ 1996 0.9 0.2 3.7 0.7 6.1 0.9 1997 1.0 0.2 -4.3 7.8 2.8 -4.3 1998 1.3 -0.1 -0.8
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend504.pdf
    • 3.5 130,860,026 3.1 1990 136,114,201 3.5 134,685,732 2.9 1991 139,412,884 2.4 139,613,309 3.7 1992 143,341,581 2.8 142,367,463 2.0 1993 148,106,159 3.3 147,033,132 3.3 1994 153,447,946 3.6 151,543,061 3.1 1995 159,658,662 4.0 158,152,644 4.4 1996 166,445,580 4.3 165,350,308 4.6 1997 173,866,799 4.5 173,857,193 5.1 1998 179,849,045 3.4 180,516,161 3.8 1999 189,501,938 185,002,911 2.9 186,594,497 3.4 2000 192,555,081 1.6% 188,499,346 1.9 187,581,092 0.5 2001 191,697,023 -0.4 185,588,179 -1.5 179,811,283 -4.1 2002 187,523,916 -2.2 180,110,858 -3.0 172,265,210 -4.2 NA - Not Available. 1 Include end-user switched access lines for competitive local exchange carriers (CLECs) and incumbent local exchange carriers (ILECs) as reported in FCC Form 477. Carriers with greater than 10,000 lines in a state are required to report. 2 Include end-user switched access
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend605.pdf
    • 61.8% Internet Access 18.6% 26.2% 41.5% 50.5% 54.6% High-Speed Access 4.4% 9.1% 19.9% Oct 1997 Dec 1998 Aug 2000 Sept 2001 Oct 2003 2 - 10 Internet Service 54.1% 54.8% 54.6% Dial-Up Service 40.4 32.3 34.3 High-Speed Service 13.2 21.8 19.9 Cable Modem 7.7 12.4 11.2 DSL 5.0 9.4 8.3 Satellite and Fixed Wireless (MMDS1) 0.6 0.3 0.4 Other 0.4 0.5 0.4 Source: A Nation Online: Entering the Broadband Age,September 2004, U.S. Department of Commerce, Economics and Statistics Administration (ESA), National Telecommunications and Information Administration (NTIA), and U.S. Census Bureau 1 MMDS - Multi-Media Distribution Systems. Table 2.7 Percent of U.S. Households with Internet and High-Speed Access: Rural versus Urban Rural Urban Total (As of October 2003) (As of October 2003)
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend801.pdf
    • 15.6 14.6 15.9 6.2 8.0 1982 10.8 9.0 2.7 3.9 4.2 1.7 1983 3.1 0.2 1.4 0.0 7.4 3.9 1984 17.2 10.4 -4.3 -5.1 3.6 3.8 1985 8.9 12.4 -3.7 -3.0 0.6 2.1 1986 7.1 8.9 -9.4 -10.0 0.3 -3.5 1987 3.3 2.6 -12.4 -11.8 -3.0 -3.0 1988 4.5 4.6 -4.2 -2.1 -4.2 -3.8 1989 0.6 1.9 -1.3 -1.7 -2.6 0.5 1990 1.0 1.5 -3.7 -0.1 -2.2 -2.2 1991 5.1 2.1 1.3 -1.3 -1.5 -2.6 1992 0.5 -0.2 -1.3 1.0 -2.4 1.3 1993 1.0 0.8 6.5 3.8 0.2 -1.1 1994 -0.3 0.7 5.4 6.1 -1.0 -1.4 1995 2.6 2/ 0.1 2/ -3.8 2/ 1996 0.9 0.2 3.7 2.5 6.1 0.5 1997 1.0 0.2 -4.3 3.6 2.8 -4.0 1998 1.3 -0.1 -0.8
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend803.pdf
    • 3.5 130,860,026 3.1 1990 136,114,201 3.5 134,685,732 2.9 1991 139,412,884 2.4 139,613,309 3.7 1992 143,341,581 2.8 142,367,463 2.0 1993 148,106,159 3.3 147,033,132 3.3 1994 153,447,946 3.6 151,543,061 3.1 1995 159,658,662 4.0 158,152,644 4.4 1996 166,445,580 4.3 165,350,308 4.6 1997 173,866,799 4.5 173,857,193 5.1 1998 179,849,045 3.4 180,516,161 3.8 1999 189,501,938 185,002,992 2.9 186,594,497 3.4 2000 192,512,938 1.6% 188,501,344 1.9 187,581,092 0.5 2001 191,697,023 -0.4 185,588,578 -1.5 179,811,283 -4.1 2002 187,508,810 -2.2 NA NA 169,913,4431 -5.5 NA - Not Available. 1Data for 2002 are preliminary from annual ARMIS (Automated Reporting Management Information System) 43-08 filings, April 1, 2003, adjusted using the 2001 adjustment factor. Source: FCC Form 477: Industry Analysis and Technology Division, Wireline Competition Bureau, Local Telephone Competition: Status as of
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trsrv-95.pdf
    • 30.9 29.4 30.8 Alternative Access and Other 29.6 1.0 25.6 Total Local Revenues 14.5 13.4 14.5 Interstate Access n.a. 3.7 3.7 Intrastate Access 2.8 n.a. 2.9 Total Access Revenues 2.8 3.7 3.5 Operator Service, Pay Telephone & Card 7.8 4.8 5.9 Non-operator Switched Toll Service 1.2 8.6 5.9 Long Distance Private Line Service 3.7 8.9 7.5 All Other Long Distance 0.5 7.3 5.5 Total Toll Revenues 2.3 8.1 6.0 Total Carrier Revenue 10.3 6.9 8.8 Telecommunications Industry Table 5 Revenue: Toll Carriers: IXCs, OSPs, Toll Resellers, Pay Telephone, Card and Other (Dollar amounts shown in millions) TRS Fund Worksheet Data 1995 Intrastate Interstate Intrastate + Interstate Interstate as % of Total RevenueAs Percent of RevenueAs Percent of RevenueAs Percent of Revenue
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trsrv-96.pdf
    • of Revenue As Percent of Revenue As Percent of Revenue Total Intrastate Total Interstate Total Carrier in Revenue Revenue Revenue Category Local Exchange Service $1,774.0 7.0% $0.0 0.0% $1,774.0 2.2% 0.0% Local Private Line Service 114.4 0.4 14.5 0.0 128.8 0.2 11.3 Cellular, PCS, Paging & Other Mobile 3,465.9 13.6 180.5 0.3 3,646.5 4.4 5.0 Other Local 896.4 3.5 274.8 0.5 1,171.2 1.4 23.5 Total Local Revenues 6,250.7 24.6 469.8 0.8 6,720.5 8.2 7.0 Interstate Access 69.4 0.3 1,081.6 1.9 1,151.0 1.4 94.0 Intrastate Access 723.9 2.8 0.0 0.0 723.9 0.9 0.0 Total Access Revenues 793.3 3.1 1,081.6 1.9 1,874.8 2.3 57.7 Operator Service, Pay Telephone & Card 2,243.6 8.8 5,791.7 10.2 8,035.2 9.8 72.1 Non-Operator Switched Toll Service 13,559.8 53.3
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trsrv-97.pdf
    • switched toll service (includes MTS, 800/888 service, etc.) 275.6 32.1 307.6 76.7 98.2 174.8 1,648.6 5,283.5 6,932.1 2,000.8 5,413.7 7,414.5 31 Long distance private line services 31.1 28.4 59.5 0.4 0.2 0.6 363.7 860.4 1,224.0 395.1 889.0 1,284.1 32 Satellite services 1.2 15.0 16.2 0.1 567.9 567.9 1.3 582.8 584.2 33 All other long distance services 131.4 13.2 144.6 5.1 0.5 5.6 180.6 1,019.8 1,200.4 317.2 1,033.4 1,350.6 Total toll service provided for resale 491.8 120.7 612.6 101.4 101.7 203.0 2,315.0 8,270.8 10,585.8 2,908.2 8,493.2 11,401.4 Total Carrier's Carrier Revenue: service provided to 11,250.8 17,610.6 28,861.3 2,467.6 271.0 2,738.5 2,378.6 8,281.3 10,659.9 16,096.9 26,162.9 42,259.8 other universal service contributors for resale Revenue for Telecommunications Service Providers Table 6: Revenue by Service
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/utilizationdec2000.pdf
    • 2.8 1,845 1.4 64,570 47.6 135,602 Colorado 8,865 50.2 174 1.0 349 2.0 598 3.4 308 1.7 7,353 41.7 17,647 Connecticut 5,275 43.5 898 7.4 330 2.7 233 1.9 251 2.1 5,150 42.4 12,139 Delaware 1,418 36.4 91 2.3 69 1.8 53 1.4 38 1.0 2,224 57.1 3,893 District of Columbia 2,693 54.6 57 1.2 594 12.0 114 2.3 26 0.5 1,450 29.4 4,933 Florida 26,635 46.9 1,072 1.9 2,588 4.6 1,737 3.1 1,044 1.8 23,692 41.7 56,768 Georgia 12,880 37.9 1,011 3.0 1,988 5.8 797 2.3 428 1.3 16,890 49.7 33,994 Hawaii 2,045 50.0 38 0.9 5 0.1 107 2.6 59 1.4 1,836 44.9 4,090 Idaho 1,733 32.7 261 4.9 39 0.7 106 2.0 83 1.6 3,074 58.0 5,297 Illinois
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/utilizationdec2001.pdf
    • due to rounding. Table 4 Telephone Number Utilization by State as of December 31, 2001 Assigned Intermediate Reserved Aging Administrative Available1 Total State/jurisdiction 000s % 000s % 000s % 000s % 000s % 000s % 000s Alabama 6,340 37.5 1,138 6.7 173 1.0 499 3.0 334 2.0 8,403 49.8 16,887 Alaska 1,027 21.7 12 0.3 51 1.1 65 1.4 24 0.5 3,542 75.0 4,722 Arizona 9,767 52.1 295 1.6 362 1.9 747 4.0 184 1.0 7,381 39.4 18,737 Arkansas 3,349 28.8 701 6.0 153 1.3 207 1.8 91 0.8 7,139 61.3 11,639 California 58,005 39.7 7,640 5.2 1,333 0.9 4,073 2.8 2,115 1.4 73,062 50.0 146,228 Colorado 9,472 50.6 76 0.4 295 1.6 832 4.4 273 1.5 7,773 41.5 18,722 Connecticut
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/utilizationdec2002.pdf
    • Figures may not add due to rounding. Table 4 Telephone Number Utilization by State as of December 31, 2002 Assigned Intermediate Reserved Aging Administrative Available1 Total State/jurisdiction 000s % 000s % 000s % 000s % 000s % 000s % 000s Alabama 6,209 34.1 1,326 7.3 139 0.8 426 2.3 258 1.4 9,871 54.1 18,229 Alaska 1,115 23.0 33 0.7 26 0.5 64 1.3 40 0.8 3,566 73.6 4,845 Arizona 9,825 51.7 346 1.8 300 1.6 625 3.3 137 0.7 7,773 40.9 19,006 Arkansas 3,324 25.8 811 6.3 185 1.4 212 1.6 241 1.9 8,099 62.9 12,872 California 59,018 39.5 8,002 5.4 1,104 0.7 3,515 2.4 2,056 1.4 75,767 50.7 149,462 Colorado 9,622 50.0 68 0.4 232 1.2 707 3.7 226 1.2
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/utilizationdec2003.pdf
    • 0.7 237 1.7 453 3.2 9,015 63.0 14,311 California 62,551 41.8 8,485 5.7 598 0.4 3,753 2.5 2,088 1.4 71,991 48.2 149,467 Colorado 9,635 50.1 210 1.1 141 0.7 577 3.0 242 1.3 8,435 43.8 19,240 Connecticut 6,229 42.3 431 2.9 312 2.1 271 1.8 252 1.7 7,229 49.1 14,724 Delaware 1,688 46.7 66 1.8 75 2.1 82 2.3 18 0.5 1,689 46.7 3,618 District of Columbia 3,274 63.5 151 2.9 153 3.0 129 2.5 20 0.4 1,431 27.7 5,158 Florida 30,066 45.9 2,823 4.3 500 0.8 2,276 3.5 893 1.4 28,982 44.2 65,540 Georgia 15,814 42.8 2,076 5.6 294 0.8 1,445 3.9 397 1.1 16,916 45.8 36,942 Guam Not shown to protect carrier confidentiality Hawaii 2,491 55.2 111 2.5 21
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/utilizationjun2001.pdf
    • September 7, 2001. Table 5 Telephone Number Utilization by State as of June 30, 2001 Assigned Intermediate Reserved Aging Administrative Available1 Total State/Jurisdiction 000s % 000s % 000s % 000s % 000s % 000s % 000s Alabama 6,359 36.7 1,074 6.2 169 1.0 514 3.0 332 1.9 8,866 51.2 17,314 Alaska 965 18.7 21 0.4 73 1.4 74 1.4 28 0.5 3,992 77.5 5,153 Arizona 9,539 52.0 431 2.4 307 1.7 629 3.4 251 1.4 7,183 39.2 18,340 Arkansas 3,015 26.4 772 6.8 129 1.1 208 1.8 84 0.7 7,218 63.2 11,426 California 57,879 40.7 8,391 5.9 1,568 1.1 4,022 2.8 1,916 1.3 68,500 48.1 142,276 Colorado 9,189 52.8 236 1.4 264 1.5 650 3.7 300 1.7 6,771 38.9 17,411 Connecticut
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/utilizationjun2003.pdf
    • 0.8 234 1.7 452 3.2 8,918 64.1 13,910 California 61,564 40.9 7,616 5.1 915 0.6 3,682 2.4 2,176 1.4 74,538 49.5 150,491 Colorado 9,672 50.6 62 0.3 198 1.0 661 3.5 235 1.2 8,282 43.3 19,111 Connecticut 6,137 40.0 677 4.4 281 1.8 272 1.8 363 2.4 7,612 49.6 15,341 Delaware 1,688 46.7 29 0.8 75 2.1 70 1.9 17 0.5 1,737 48.0 3,615 District of Columbia 3,252 63.4 14 0.3 167 3.3 127 2.5 26 0.5 1,543 30.1 5,130 Florida 28,921 45.2 3,401 5.3 469 0.7 2,186 3.4 985 1.5 28,023 43.8 63,984 Georgia 14,398 39.5 3,063 8.4 271 0.7 1,035 2.8 390 1.1 17,323 47.5 36,480 Guam Not shown to protect carrier confidentiality Hawaii 2,490 55.4 77 1.7 12
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/utilizationjun2004.pdf
    • 38.0 415 2.1 216 1.1 644 3.3 259 1.3 10,708 54.2 19,756 Alaska 1,085 24.2 6 0.1 15 0.3 58 1.3 18 0.4 3,303 73.6 4,486 Arizona 10,274 53.5 391 2.0 201 1.0 589 3.1 174 0.9 7,579 39.5 19,209 Arkansas 3,801 27.4 769 5.5 89 0.6 283 2.0 446 3.2 8,470 61.1 13,858 California 64,497 43.7 7,563 5.1 758 0.5 3,418 2.3 2,053 1.4 69,262 46.9 147,551 Colorado 10,005 52.1 60 0.3 125 0.7 590 3.1 261 1.4 8,151 42.5 19,191 Connecticut 6,577 43.1 375 2.5 144 0.9 248 1.6 222 1.5 7,708 50.5 15,274 Delaware 2,071 50.1 33 0.8 80 1.9 70 1.7 17 0.4 1,865 45.1 4,137 District of Columbia 3,512 66.7 18 0.3 155 2.9 124 2.4
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Intl/4361-96.pdf
    • 5.3 156,690,80745.726.319.8 6.7 1.5 Cyprus $8,653,92663.423.110.3 0.0 3.2 $3,220,36954.932.113.0 0.0 0.0 $607,35457.935.3 6.8 0.0 0.0 13,638,36254.328.213.9 0.0 3.6 Denmark $43,009,23157.722.511.1 7.9 0.8 $7,370,74149.925.517.4 7.2 0.0 $986,36135.854.010.2 0.0 0.0 88,916,02842.323.620.611.8 1.8 Finland $22,523,77570.816.9 9.2 2.2 0.9 $4,512,42650.923.622.3 3.1 0.0 $255,67151.020.414.5 0.014.1 43,682,36350.124.119.4 4.3 2.1 France $274,284,44462.121.310.8 5.1 0.7 $40,499,39245.332.414.8 6.3 1.2 $5,378,68167.824.9 7.4 0.0 0.0 645,781,05142.429.315.310.2 2.9 Germany $509,982,48169.221.4 7.7 1.3 0.5 $39,083,06549.632.511.3 5.5 1.1 $17,556,44276.121.8 0.0 0.0 2.1 1,094,777,71550.131.511.5 5.3 1.5 Gibraltar $834,08579.817.0 2.9 0.0 0.2 $145,77799.9 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 $71,302100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 839,78876.519.5 3.6 0.0 0.4 Greece $90,151,06866.822.4 7.9 0.9 2.1 $19,305,85258.834.5 6.6 0.0 0.0 $7,769,64179.615.7 4.7 0.0 0.0 123,553,01960.225.8 9.2 1.0 3.8 Greenland $229,25756.929.312.4 0.0 1.5 $0 $0 247,40144.833.519.2 0.0 2.5 Iceland $8,743,94567.023.2 9.0 0.0 0.7
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Intl/4361-97.pdf
    • 3 4 Other Minutes 1 2 3 4 Other Andorra $234,36249.823.6 5.2 0.121.3 $543 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0100.0 $0 299,672 0.423.9 5.4 0.369.9 Austria $39,990,02564.825.7 8.4 0.4 0.7 $4,708,00643.640.415.8 0.0 0.1 $1,339,632100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 83,840,67948.536.613.2 0.6 1.1 Belgium $86,458,00559.622.112.4 3.5 2.5 $10,343,96346.527.312.610.0 3.6 $3,427,230 8.5 7.9 2.3 0.081.3 173,272,93745.123.015.0 9.1 7.9 Cyprus $9,534,85256.225.8 8.1 0.1 9.8 $2,479,90056.420.822.3 0.0 0.5 $339,53843.948.9 7.2 0.0 0.0 13,930,25850.120.715.8 0.113.3 Denmark $45,095,78656.023.510.5 3.8 6.2 $4,188,49144.625.022.7 7.7 0.0 $3,308,60288.4 8.5 3.1 0.0 0.0 104,296,80537.025.718.8 8.110.4 Finland $20,799,22456.427.9 7.9 3.6 4.2 $4,248,12842.719.515.622.3 0.0 $1,016,01792.7 6.7 0.6 0.0 0.0 47,252,20945.822.413.510.1 8.2 France $322,044,82152.535.0 7.8 3.6 1.1 $29,592,33041.027.915.615.2 0.3 $7,141,72866.718.311.0 0.0 4.0 719,308,75541.927.913.913.7 2.5 Germany $503,613,45264.222.2 7.8 3.0 2.8 $34,185,89545.330.9 9.9 9.9 4.0 $8,426,11957.336.5 0.7 0.0 5.5 1,320,125,71643.128.2
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Intl/4361-98.pdf
    • Receipts Percent share by carrier Receipts Percent share by carrier Total Percent share by carrier revenues 1 2 3 4 Other from PTT 1 2 3 4 Other from PTT 1 2 3 4 Other Minutes 1 2 3 4 Other Andorra $165,32437.6 4.410.821.625.5 $848 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0100.0 $5,567100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 385,29420.8 8.6 7.819.043.7 Austria $39,813,44164.6 0.822.611.5 0.5 $3,700,48445.3 0.027.624.2 2.9 $307,19396.3 0.0 0.1 0.0 3.6 102,113,63144.9 2.328.322.5 2.0 Belgium $70,985,42059.9 0.423.413.3 2.9 $6,508,72050.5 0.030.716.7 2.1 $1,662,64369.7 0.016.2 0.213.9 156,393,16341.5 1.828.016.812.0 Cyprus $8,822,85956.3 0.726.312.4 4.4 $2,112,03161.3 0.025.010.4 3.3 $322,76076.5 0.013.2 8.6 1.7 15,657,68051.3 1.420.515.611.1 Denmark $36,270,24164.0 1.522.3 7.3 4.8 $2,869,38337.8 0.035.216.011.0 $1,115,23957.3 0.036.8 4.8 1.1 102,361,57041.4 6.930.2 9.511.9 Finland $16,259,03442.8 2.642.610.3 1.6 $2,328,58342.2 0.038.518.3 1.0 $735,38894.0 0.0 5.1
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Intl/4361-f00.pdf
    • 97,723,96834.131.7 0.410.023.9 Finland $14,471,46643.043.6 0.212.3 0.9 $1,674,26749.433.3 0.012.2 5.0 $248,70166.524.4 0.0 9.1 0.0 40,752,76237.635.8 0.219.4 7.0 France $222,125,50753.227.1 0.511.9 7.3 $13,915,86251.723.5 0.012.412.3 $7,669,11178.016.9 0.0 5.0 0.0 783,604,44936.624.1 0.415.023.9 Germany $410,439,31965.817.9 0.710.3 5.5 $50,303,27076.612.1 0.0 7.1 4.2 $3,225,49563.831.6 0.0 4.2 0.3 1,610,011,23650.519.9 0.611.717.2 Gibraltar $579,83794.0 0.1 0.9 1.6 3.4 $124,18699.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.3 $89,729100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1,879,48288.3 0.0 0.5 1.210.0 Greece $132,243,15834.260.9 0.7 3.2 1.0 $5,266,54643.343.1 0.012.9 0.7 $1,562,64139.560.1 0.0 0.4 0.0 252,187,00949.037.1 0.7 8.6 4.6 Greenland $35,85115.044.9 7.931.2 1.0 $838 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0100.0 $155100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 87,186 4.039.5 5.343.7 7.5 Iceland $7,004,23949.532.4 0.117.6 0.4 $1,202,92046.418.6 0.034.9 0.1 $302,63967.332.6 0.0 0.1 0.0 24,958,89838.322.8 0.037.8 1.1 Ireland $83,126,93656.832.3 0.2 9.4 1.3 $3,211,04645.333.8 0.016.8 4.0 $1,437,07976.022.9 0.0 1.0
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Intl/4361-f01.pdf
    • by carrier Receipts Percent share by carrier Total Percent share by carrier Revenues 1 2 3 4 Other from PTT 1 2 3 4 Other from PTT 1 2 3 4 Other Minutes 1 2 3 4 Other Andorra $70,765 0.047.740.1 0.012.3 $2,442 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0100.0 $79 0.0100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 317,965 0.012.149.4 0.038.5 Austria $147,885,42686.7 9.5 2.4 0.9 0.5 $998,195 0.022.824.121.032.0 $256,295 0.064.4 3.132.5 0.0 168,238,05053.812.813.913.2 6.3 Belgium $51,820,958 0.067.116.712.5 3.8 $4,663,986 0.027.826.931.513.8 $218,426 0.075.010.614.4 0.0 217,711,584 0.037.234.220.0 8.6 Cyprus $4,865,213 0.050.717.716.115.5 $500,228 0.022.7 6.054.117.2 $63,777 0.085.5 2.611.9 0.0 25,488,438 0.023.621.233.022.1 Denmark $14,896,223 0.046.917.530.4 5.1 $1,909,333 0.0 5.029.453.512.1 $159,239 0.063.4 4.130.3 2.2 88,362,036 0.024.622.739.313.4 Finland $18,453,473 0.057.415.724.2 2.7 $1,417,570 0.026.712.155.1 6.2 $88,923 0.066.4 4.828.7 0.0 72,847,849 0.033.230.127.8 8.9 France
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Intl/4361-f02.pdf
    • from PTT 1 2 3 4 Other from PTT 1 2 3 4 Other Minutes 1 2 3 4 Other Andorra $217,559 0.624.1 2.666.2 6.4 $2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0100.0 $9,647 0.0 0.0100.0 0.0 0.0 3,824,275 0.7 7.6 2.485.9 3.4 Austria $18,929,67055.512.9 0.727.3 3.6 $616,11731.837.9 0.030.2 0.0 $174,32914.0 3.216.4 0.166.3 84,161,68630.429.6 2.226.611.2 Belgium $64,141,98959.415.4 0.422.2 2.7 $4,670,31543.927.1 0.123.4 5.5 $3,236,64721.6 0.5 1.4 0.276.4 291,753,99445.322.0 1.321.6 9.9 Cyprus $5,823,44258.1 7.7 1.924.5 7.8 $321,98458.316.8 0.024.9 0.0 $350,54477.5 0.420.8 1.4 0.0 37,296,46351.112.3 2.324.8 9.5 Denmark $13,207,53237.722.1 0.833.5 5.9 $1,984,08115.543.6 0.037.7 3.2 $549,525 3.8 0.510.2 0.085.6 106,191,82325.130.7 1.932.7 9.6 Finland $12,611,03847.117.5 1.429.5 4.6 $989,86039.127.2 0.033.5 0.1 $73,60342.3 2.248.4 6.2 0.9 66,543,56730.923.0 2.832.810.5 France $141,490,38152.616.8 0.621.5 8.5 $8,623,29050.2 9.8 0.237.3 2.4 $9,015,36033.9 0.2 1.9 9.155.0 982,168,72435.211.8
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Intl/4361-f99.pdf
    • Total Percent share by carrier revenues 1 2 3 4 Other from PTT 1 2 3 4 Other from PTT 1 2 3 4 Other Minutes 1 2 3 4 Other Andorra $65,875 4.827.726.4 4.736.4 $924 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0100.0 $0 195,230 1.217.720.113.347.6 Austria $49,393,43145.838.7 9.3 1.6 4.5 $2,484,80850.927.816.4 0.0 4.9 $1,437,87299.7 0.2 0.1 0.0 0.1 134,403,60028.633.417.1 7.413.4 Belgium $76,019,97649.734.010.9 0.5 5.0 $4,412,48057.630.510.6 0.0 1.3 $763,19719.975.6 4.4 0.0 0.0 179,985,31933.925.911.1 2.726.4 Cyprus $11,531,61550.427.912.9 0.5 8.2 $1,577,25043.422.910.5 0.023.2 $39,12022.940.037.1 0.0 0.0 22,880,48131.716.624.4 1.625.7 Denmark $32,113,95550.430.211.2 1.0 7.2 $2,217,94534.942.016.4 0.0 6.7 $450,20942.557.1 0.4 0.0 0.0 89,076,52830.332.713.2 7.216.6 Finland $19,457,33354.632.410.1 0.8 2.1 $1,935,50643.535.820.1 0.2 0.4 $3,111,937 2.7 2.0 0.395.0 0.0 49,027,58240.328.119.7 4.9 7.0 France $204,684,69648.230.412.8 1.6 7.1 $16,921,18356.516.422.2 0.0 4.8 $11,573,38568.4 9.9 1.720.0 0.0
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Intl/crepor03.pdf
    • Other Andorra $135,012 9.2 9.8 30.7 41.0 9.3 $221 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 $0 1,233,272 6.7 15.5 34.1 35.8 7.9 Austria $24,332,000 59.0 1.8 15.4 20.7 3.1 $861,359 27.3 0.0 33.4 29.7 9.5 $236,414 1.2 93.2 5.6 0.0 0.0 126,782,194 37.4 4.9 18.2 30.9 8.6 Belgium $47,235,918 66.0 1.4 14.5 16.1 2.0 $3,007,339 67.3 3.7 15.3 12.5 1.2 $3,964,804 0.5 98.4 1.1 0.0 0.0 238,021,299 42.8 5.1 23.1 19.9 9.1 Cyprus $5,878,313 68.9 1.9 15.0 11.3 2.9 $288,424 41.8 0.0 37.8 18.7 1.6 $58,206 54.6 0.0 45.4 0.0 0.0 28,345,029 32.9 3.2 34.5 22.3 7.1 Denmark $16,572,844 49.3 2.8 28.1 15.5 4.3 $1,440,655 17.9 18.8 34.6 27.9 0.8 $1,633,327 1.1 98.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 116,207,159 24.2 11.5 37.0 21.5 5.8
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Intl/itltrd98.pdf
    • 30.9 45.7 62.7 77.4 151.9 231.1 262.9 48.5% Colombia 2.2 2.6 3.3 6.5 12.3 11.6 17.0 25.0 39.9 46.4 37.3 47.7 57.8 63.3 70.9 77.6 88.4 95.8 111.7 122.9 131.9 139.2 9.5% Dominican Rep. 1.6 3.0 3.0 5.2 8.2 10.7 10.9 13.1 32.2 21.6 23.9 44.7 48.0 61.9 75.3 80.8 114.2 125.8 119.2 125.0 125.5 110.8 -2.6% Egypt 0.2 0.4 0.5 0.7 1.0 2.2 3.8 4.4 9.3 11.9 14.6 16.1 16.6 18.2 21.4 22.7 27.7 33.4 33.3 37.0 41.7 55.8 13.1% El Salvador 0.5 0.3 1.2 2.6 3.3 5.9 7.1 10.9 12.6 16.7 17.7 22.2 26.7 33.0 42.6 52.8 60.3 64.0 65.0 69.6 77.1 74.9 5.0% France (5.2) 2.3 (3.5) 2.2 1.3 0.4 7.7 10.9 12.9 26.7 16.1 27.2 26.4 31.4
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Intl/itltrd99.pdf
    • 77.4 151.9 231.1 262.9 229.7 31.3% Colombia 2.2 2.6 3.3 6.5 12.3 11.6 17.0 25.0 39.9 46.4 37.3 47.7 57.8 63.3 70.9 77.6 88.4 95.8 111.7 122.9 131.9 139.2 113.0 1.5% Dominican Rep. 1.6 3.0 3.0 5.2 8.2 10.7 10.9 13.1 32.2 21.6 23.9 44.7 48.0 61.9 75.3 80.8 114.2 125.8 119.2 125.0 125.5 110.8 83.4 -8.0% Egypt 0.2 0.4 0.5 0.7 1.0 2.2 3.8 4.4 9.3 11.9 14.6 16.1 16.6 18.2 21.4 22.7 27.7 33.4 33.3 37.0 41.7 55.8 64.6 18.9% El Salvador 0.5 0.3 1.2 2.6 3.3 5.9 7.1 10.9 12.6 16.7 17.7 22.2 26.7 33.0 42.6 52.8 60.3 64.0 65.0 69.6 77.1 74.9 67.4 1.5% France (5.2) 2.3 (3.5) 2.2 1.3 0.4 7.7 10.9 12.9 26.7 16.1 27.2
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Intl/itrnd00.pdf
    • Rate 1993 to 1999 5/ Australia 78.3 87.2 93.4 104.1 118.6 140.1 150.1 155.8 131.6 236.6 446.0 19.1% Brazil 51.9 56.1 60.5 49.3 46.9 62.1 101.7 123.5 159.2 180.2 185.9 27.1 Canada 9/ 1,172.11,340.91,421.01,512.21,605.61,800.82,067.32,845.93,141.93,359.03,922.1 16.8 China 10.5 12.9 17.2 25.4 41.1 48.5 52.4 58.3 61.8 79.4 46.9 5.7 Colombia 39.4 41.3 46.4 50.5 51.8 58.9 59.7 61.4 67.6 51.2 57.2 0.5 Dominican Republic 37.7 39.0 46.8 50.5 62.3 69.2 97.4 125.1 107.8 113.2 122.0 11.7 Egypt 5.1 6.0 6.7 6.8 8.0 8.6 9.2 9.6 10.7 11.7 11.2 6.5 El Salvador 9.9 8.1 7.8 8.5 7.8 8.0 8.6 9.9 12.7 16.0 24.8 20.6 France 122.2 135.5 147.0 156.6 161.7 170.3 181.2 203.6 216.7 270.8 226.2 7.8 Germany 15/ 191.9 197.8 211.9 235.9
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Intl/itrnd01.pdf
    • 33.2 35.5 6.5 Philippines 23.2 37.0 42.9 42.3 50.2 33.4 50.8 38.9 57.3 73.3 104.3 22.8 Poland 25.0 28.7 34.0 31.5 27.1 27.3 27.8 24.9 24.2 13.3 20.0 -10.3 Russia 8.0 31.6 30.2 26.6 31.0 29.8 22.0 17.4 27.6 54.9 24.1 6.3 Saudi Arabia 30.0 29.8 28.2 24.1 27.2 31.8 36.9 32.0 24.0 35.7 30.3 n.m. Sierra Leone 0.1 0.4 0.5 0.5 1.0 1.2 1.2 0.6 1.2 1.1 1.9 8.0 Singapore 34.2 37.7 43.5 51.1 53.5 61.4 65.8 26.4 72.7 73.5 65.0 4.8 South Africa 18.8 20.8 24.3 26.7 29.3 31.1 36.5 38.9 39.0 28.1 36.7 0.1 Spain 53.1 45.4 51.8 46.1 61.5 85.3 76.0 85.1 112.0 108.3 144.4 12.0 Switzerland 66.1 66.1 73.0 77.3 91.9 98.0 102.1 81.7 118.1 98.0
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr03-2.pdf
    • $438.6 $482.6 $555.4 $638.5 $178.1 $164.6 $176.6 LinkUp 34.0 30.5 31.1 30.7 8.9 7.8 8.1 Incremental Toll Limitation 3.1 2.9 3.2 3.9 1.1 0.9 1.1 PICC Reimbursement 4.5 3.2 - - - - - Prior Period True-Ups - - - - -2.2 -3.4 -12.5 Total Low-Income Support 480.2 519.1 589.7 673.1 186.0 169.9 173.2 Administrative Expenses 2.1 0.9 1.8 1.7 0.5 0.9 1.0 Less Interest Income -4.4 -5.8 -4.6 -1.4 -0.3 -0.2 -0.2 Low-Income Support Expenses $477.9 $514.2 $586.9 $673.3 $186.1 $170.7 $174.0 Note: Detail may not match totals because of necessary rounding. Source: USAC quarterly filings. (in Millions of Dollars) Table 2.4 Federal Low-Income Support Fund Sizes for 1999 to 2002 and Projections for the First Three Quarters of 2003
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr03-7.pdf
    • 15.6 14.6 15.9 6.2 8.0 1982 10.8 9.0 2.7 3.9 4.2 1.7 1983 3.1 0.2 1.4 0.0 7.4 3.9 1984 17.2 10.4 -4.3 -5.1 3.6 3.8 1985 8.9 12.4 -3.7 -3.0 0.6 2.1 1986 7.1 8.9 -9.4 -10.0 0.3 -3.5 1987 3.3 2.6 -12.4 -11.8 -3.0 -3.0 1988 4.5 4.6 -4.2 -2.1 -4.2 -3.8 1989 0.6 1.9 -1.3 -1.7 -2.6 0.5 1990 1.0 1.5 -3.7 -0.1 -2.2 -2.2 1991 5.1 2.1 1.3 -1.3 -1.5 -2.6 1992 0.5 -0.2 -1.3 1.0 -2.4 1.3 1993 1.0 0.8 6.5 3.8 0.2 -1.1 1994 -0.3 0.7 5.4 6.1 -1.0 -1.4 1995 2.6 ** 0.1 ** -3.8 ** 1996 0.9 0.2 3.7 0.7 6.1 0.9 1997 1.0 0.2 -4.3 7.8 2.8 -4.3 1998 1.3 -0.1 -0.8
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr03-9.pdf
    • 8.1 3.3 14.6 4.7 LOCAL SERVICES PROVIDED TO RESIDENTIAL AND BUSINESS CUSTOMERS Percent Installation Commitments Met 93.0 99.4 99.0 99.5 98.6 98.6 98.5 98.7 97.8 Residence 97.1 99.5 99.1 99.6 98.7 98.6 98.7 98.9 98.2 Business 88.9 98.6 98.3 98.9 98.0 97.8 96.7 96.8 94.9 Average Installation Interval (days) 1.3 0.6 2.1 1.4 1.6 1.1 1.3 0.6 1.6 Residence 1.0 0.5 2.1 1.2 1.6 1.0 1.2 0.4 1.5 Business 1.6 1.4 2.6 2.7 1.8 1.8 2.4 1.7 2.5 Average Out of Service Repair Interval (hours) 18.4 13.6 18.6 23.5 19.8 23.8 21.6 14.3 15.1 Residence 20.0 13.6 18.9 25.9 21.0 25.1 22.9 15.4 15.2 Business 10.6 13.5 17.1 12.1 13.2 18.9 15.2 9.2 13.7 Initial Trouble Reports per Thousand Lines 285.0
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr04-3.pdf
    • 915 1,028 1,072 1,132 1,188 1,263 1,694 1,718 2,239 2,621 2,949 3,280 3,460 1986198719881989199019911992199319941995199619971998199920002001200220032004 3 - 14 YearCompaniesHigh-Cost Loop Support Safety Net Additive Support High-Cost Model Support Long- Term Support Interstate Common Line Support Interstate Access Support Local Switching Support Total Support ILECs 864.1 - - 472.7 - - 380.3 1,717.1 1999 CLECs 0.1 - - 0.4 - - 0.0 0.5 Total 864.2 - - 473.1 - - 380.3 1,717.6 ILECs 871.8 - 219.6 477.3 - 283.1 384.7 2,236.5 2000 CLECs 0.7 - 0.1 1.9 - 0.0 0.0 2.6 Total 872.5 - 219.6 479.1 - 283.1 384.7 2,239.1 ILECs 957.9 - 199.5 484.9 - 573.8 387.9 2,603.9 2001 CLECs 5.8 - 0.3 8.1 - 0.6 1.9 16.8 Total 963.6 - 199.8
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr04-6.pdf
    • 96.9 1.0 Mississippi 82.4 91.7 9.3 * Missouri 91.5 95.9 4.4 * Montana 91.0 93.2 2.3 * Nebraska 95.7 96.0 0.3 Nevada 90.4 94.5 4.1 * New Hampshire 94.3 97.6 3.3 * New Jersey 94.8 96.3 1.5 * New Mexico 82.0 91.7 9.6 * New York 91.8 95.2 3.4 * North Carolina 88.3 94.1 5.8 * North Dakota 94.6 94.1 -0.5 Ohio 92.4 96.3 3.8 * Oklahoma 90.3 91.6 1.3 Oregon 90.6 96.5 5.9 * Pennsylvania 94.9 97.0 2.2 * Rhode Island 93.6 96.9 3.3 * South Carolina 83.7 93.2 9.6 * South Dakota 93.2 94.1 0.9 Tennessee 88.5 94.2 5.7 * Texas 88.4 93.6 5.2 * Utah 92.5 97.1 4.5 * Vermont 92.3 97.0 4.8 * Virginia 93.1 95.5 2.4
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr04-7.pdf
    • 3.5 1.1 2.7 1987 3.4 4.4 -1.3 1988 4.1 4.4 1.3 1989 3.5 4.6 -0.3 1990 1.9 6.1 -0.4 1991 -0.2 3.1 3.5 1992 3.3 2.9 -0.3 1993 2.7 2.7 1.8 1994 4.0 2.7 0.7 1995 2.5 2.5 1.2 1996 3.7 3.3 2.1 1997 4.5 1.7 0.2 1998 4.2 1.6 0.3* 1999 4.5 2.7 0.4 2000 3.7 3.4 -2.3 2001 0.5 1.6 1.3 2002 2.2 2.4 0.2 2003 3.1 1.9 -2.7 * The CPI telephone service index was revised in December of 1997. Sources: Bureau of Labor Statistics and Bureau of Economic Analysis. Chart 7.2 Table 7.2 Annual Changes in Major Price Indices GDP Chain-type Price Index CPI - All ItemsCPI - Telephone Services Note: All values calculated as the percent
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr04-9.pdf
    • orders. 12 See supra note 8. BellSouth Qwest SBC SBC SBC SBC Verizon Verizon Verizon Ameritech PacificSouthwestern SNET North South GTE ACCESS SERVICES PROVIDED TO INTEREXCHANGE CARRIERS -- SWITCHED ACCESS Percent Installation Commitments Met 100.0 99.6 77.5 96.9 89.5 40.8 98.3 98.5 95.0 Average Installation Interval (days) 18.2 15.8 43.6 34.3 27.2 NA 26.8 23.5 25.7 Average Repair Interval (hours) 0.5 1.5 6.5 17.9 5.2 0.7 3.9 6.3 10.5 ACCESS SERVICES PROVIDED TO INTEREXCHANGE CARRIERS -- SPECIAL ACCESS Percent Installation Commitments Met 99.8 98.4 96.0 99.1 98.3 95.2 88.1 89.7 92.4 Average Installation Interval (days) 12.0 9.2 17.4 17.2 17.0 17.5 23.9 17.8 19.6 Average Repair Interval (hours) 3.2 2.8 4.3 3.5 3.1 3.6 8.0 4.4 18.2 LOCAL SERVICES PROVIDED TO
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr97-4.pdf
    • 5.8 328.0 1992FIRST QUARTER 84.5 1.2 85.6 SECOND QUARTER 85.4 1.1 86.5 THIRD QUARTER 86.8 1.0 87.9 FOURTH QUARTER 88.8 1.0 89.8 TOTAL 1992 345.5 4.2 349.7 1993FIRST QUARTER 89.8 0.9 90.6 SECOND QUARTER 90.4 0.8 91.2 THIRD QUARTER 92.9 0.7 93.6 FOURTH QUARTER 95.2 0.6 95.9 TOTAL 1993 368.3 3.0 371.2 1994FIRST QUARTER 98.1 0.6 98.7 SECOND QUARTER 97.4 0.5 97.9 THIRD QUARTER 101.4 0.5 101.9 FOURTH QUARTER 102.4 0.5 102.9 TOTAL 1994 399.3 2.1 401.4 1995FIRST QUARTER 105.1 0.4 105.6 SECOND QUARTER 106.4 0.4 106.8 THIRD QUARTER 108.6 0.4 109.0 FOURTH QUARTER 110.2 0.4 110.6 TOTAL 1995 430.3 1.6 431.9 1996FIRST QUARTER 115.3 0.4 115.6 SECOND QUARTER 114.4 0.3 114.8 THIRD QUARTER 117.5 0.3 117.8 FOURTH QUARTER 120.4 0.2
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr97-5.pdf
    • Price Indices for Local Telephone Service Local Residential Service CPI: All Local PPI: Monthly Charges Service Charges 1978 1.4% 3.1% 1979 1.7 1.6 1980 7.0 7.1 1981 12.6 15.6 1982 10.8 9.0 1983 3.1 0.2 1984 17.2 10.4 1985 8.9 12.4 1986 7.1 8.9 1987 3.3 2.6 1988 4.5 4.6 1989 0.6 1.9 1990 1.0 1.5 1991 5.1 2.1 1992 0.5 -0.2 1993 1.0 0.8 1994 -0.3 0.7 1995 2.6 ** 1996 0.2 0.4 1997*** 3.8 0.2 * Measured December to December, except as noted. ** The BLS introduced new producer price indices for telephone services in June of 1995. Comparisons of the two PPI series may not be valid. *** Measured April through April. The CPI for April 1996 reflected
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr98-1.pdf
    • etc.) 30 Other switched toll service (includes MTS, 800/888 service, etc.) 275.6 32.1 307.6 76.7 98.2 174.8 1,648.6 5,283.5 6,932.1 2,000.8 5,413.7 7,414.5 31Long distance private line services 31.1 28.4 59.5 0.4 0.2 0.6 363.7 860.4 1,224.0 395.1 889.0 1,284.1 32Satellite services 1.2 15.0 16.2 0.1 567.9 567.9 1.3 582.8 584.2 33All other long distance services 131.4 13.2 144.6 5.1 0.5 5.6 180.6 1,019.8 1,200.4 317.2 1,033.4 1,350.6 Total toll service provided for resale 491.8 120.7 612.6 101.4 101.7 203.0 2,315.0 8,270.810,585.8 2,908.2 8,493.2 11,401.4 Total Carrier's Carrier Revenue: service provided to 11,250.817,610.6 28,861.3 2,467.6 271.0 2,738.5 2,378.6 8,281.310,659.9 16,096.926,162.9 42,259.8 other universal service contributors for resale 1 - 11 Revenue for Telecommunications Service Providers Table 1.5: Revenue by Service Category
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr98-6.pdf
    • Dakota 95.1 96.5 1.4 Ohio 92.2 95.4 3.2 * Oklahoma 91.5 91.5 -0.0 Oregon 91.2 96.8 5.6 * Pennsylvania 95.1 95.9 0.8 Rhode Island 93.3 95.1 1.8 South Carolina 81.8 92.2 10.4 * South Dakota 92.7 93.1 0.4 Tennessee 87.6 95.1 7.5 * Texas 89.0 91.8 2.8 * Utah 90.3 97.4 7.1 * Vermont 92.7 94.9 2.2 Virginia 93.1 93.6 0.5 Washington 92.5 95.5 3.1 West Virginia 88.1 93.8 5.7 * Wisconsin 94.8 97.0 2.2 Wyoming 89.7 94.8 5.1 * Total United States 91.4 94.1 2.7 * * Increase is statistically significant at the 95% confidence level. ** Decrease is statistically significant at the 95% confidence level. Differences may not appear to equal changes due to rounding. 6 - 9 TABLE
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr98-7.pdf
    • 15.6 14.6 15.9 6.2 8.0 1982 10.8 9.0 2.6 3.9 4.2 1.7 1983 3.1 0.2 1.5 0.0 7.4 3.9 1984 17.2 10.4 -4.3 -5.1 3.6 3.8 1985 8.9 12.4 -3.7 -3.0 0.6 2.1 1986 7.1 8.9 -9.4 -10.0 0.3 -3.5 1987 3.3 2.6 -12.4 -11.8 -3.0 -3.0 1988 4.5 4.6 -4.2 -2.1 -4.2 -3.7 1989 0.6 1.9 -1.3 -1.7 -2.6 0.5 1990 1.0 1.5 -3.7 -0.1 -2.2 -2.2 1991 5.1 2.1 1.3 -1.3 -1.5 -2.6 1992 0.5 -0.2 -1.3 1.0 -2.4 1.3 1993 1.0 0.8 6.5 3.8 0.2 -1.1 1994 -0.3 0.7 5.4 6.1 -1.0 -1.4 1995 2.6 ** 0.1 ** -3.8 ** 1996 0.9 0.4 4.0 0.7 4.0 0.9 1997 1.0 0.2 -4.3 1.7 2.0 -4.3 Source: Bureau of Labor
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr98-8.pdf
    • TOTAL 1992 345.5 4.2 349.7 8 - 7 TABLE 8.4 INTERSTATE SWITCHED PREMIUM AND NON-PREMIUM ACCESS MINUTES (MINUTES SHOWN IN BILLIONS) PREMIUM NON-PREMIUM TOTAL MINUTES MINUTES MINUTES 1993FIRST QUARTER 89.8 0.9 90.6 SECOND QUARTER 90.4 0.8 91.2 THIRD QUARTER 92.9 0.7 93.6 FOURTH QUARTER 95.2 0.6 95.9 TOTAL 1993 368.3 3.0 371.2 1994FIRST QUARTER 98.1 0.6 98.7 SECOND QUARTER 97.4 0.5 97.9 THIRD QUARTER 101.4 0.5 101.9 FOURTH QUARTER 102.4 0.5 102.9 TOTAL 1994 399.3 2.1 401.4 1995FIRST QUARTER 105.1 0.4 105.6 SECOND QUARTER 106.4 0.4 106.8 THIRD QUARTER 108.6 0.4 109.0 FOURTH QUARTER 110.2 0.4 110.6 TOTAL 1995 430.3 1.6 431.9 1996FIRST QUARTER 115.3 0.3 115.7 SECOND QUARTER 114.4 0.3 114.7 THIRD QUARTER 117.6 0.3 117.8 FOURTH QUARTER 120.4 0.2
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr98-9.pdf
    • per Event in Thousands 2,027.4 543.3 194.4 694.8 360.4 240.8 419.2 169.4 190.7 Outage Line-Minutes per 1,000 Access Lines 5,524.8 765.3 1,070.2 4,397.2 305.5 1,169.5 4,042.8 3,395.8 3,599.8 For Scheduled Downtime More than 2 Minutes Number of Occurrences or Events 182 37 15 5 13 144 239 24 39 Events per Hundred Switches 12.9 2.6 0.9 0.4 1.6 9.6 14.3 0.5 2.4 Events per Million Access Lines 9.92 1.93 0.74 0.31 0.73 10.44 16.70 1.47 5.94 Average Outage Duration in Minutes 3.4 3.3 2.9 7.3 4.9 3.5 3.7 11.0 18.6 Avg. Lines Affected per Event in Thousands 23.8 27.1 32.5 22.2 20.2 11.9 7.2 7.9 7.1 Outage Line-Minutes per Event in Thousands 77.7 80.7 97.6 220.5 67.5 47.7 45.6 54.8 56.8
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrd99-2.pdf
    • $320,062,804 2 - 58 Table 2.4 Federal Low Income Programs Fund Size Projections for 1999 and 2000 (in Millions of Dollars) Low Income Programs 1st Quarter - 1999 2nd Quarter - 1999 3rd Quarter - 19994th Quarter - 1999 1st Quarter - 2000 Lifeline Assistance $128.6 $112.3 $111.4 $111.8 $117.6 Link-Up 13.0 11.3 9.8 8.8 9.1 Incremental Toll Limitation 0.8 0.5 0.5 0.8 0.9 PICC Reimbursement 0.8 0.7 0.9 1.0 1.1 Prior Period True-ups 0.8 -5.0 2.8 -9.4 -3.8 Administrative Expenses 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.2 0.3 Less Interest Income -0.7 -0.8 -0.8 -0.8 -0.5 Total Low Income Programs $143.8 $119.5 $125.1 $112.4 $124.7 Note: Detail may not match totals because of necessary rounding. Source: USAC quarterly filings: January 29, 1999, April
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrd99-3.pdf
    • 218.2 223.6 Long Term Support 471.9 472.2 117.4 118.3 118.3 118.3 119.8 Local Switching Support 412.6 389.5 97.7 97.9 98.2 95.7 97.3 Incremental Support under the Forward-Looking Mechanism - - - - - - 63.8 Prior Period True-ups -14.1 12.8 7.9 5.4 -1.2 0.7 -3.1 Administrative Expenses 4.8 5.9 2.2 1.1 1.2 1.4 1.0 Interest Income -5.1 -2.6 -0.9 -0.6 -0.5 -0.6 -0.6 Total High Cost Programs 1701.2 1736.4 440.4 439.2 423.1 433.7 501.7 Note: Details may not appear to add to totals due to rounding 3 - 20 State or Jurisdiction ALABAMA $21,762,696 $7,260,720 $8,463,948 $37,487,364 ALASKA $36,946,791 $16,782,816 $14,703,024 $68,432,631 ARIZONA $18,633,267 $3,079,740 $9,825,564 $31,538,571 ARKANSAS $51,027,561 $15,238,044 $8,190,828 $74,456,433 CALIFORNIA $30,136,113 $13,136,832 $7,369,860 $50,642,805 COLORADO $28,273,371 $11,987,184 $3,823,776
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrd99-5.pdf
    • urban areas pay for these services.1 The Commission's Universal Service rules permit eligible2 health care providers to receive support for any telecommunications service3 and for distance charges for the distance between the rural health care provider and the nearest large city.4 The Commission defined "nearest large city" as the closest city in the state with a population of at least 50,000.5 In addition, any health care provider that cannot obtain toll-free Internet access is entitled to receive the lesser of $180 of toll charges per month, or the toll charges incurred for 30 hours per month, for telecommunications access to an Internet service provider.6 An eligible rural health care provider must submit FCC Form 465 (description of services requested and certification
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrd99-6.pdf
    • 95.7 3.3 * Colorado 93.2 96.7 3.5 * Connecticut 95.5 96.5 1.0 Delaware 94.3 95.7 1.5 District of Columbia 94.9 92.4 -2.5 ** Florida 88.7 92.6 3.9 * Georgia 86.2 92.1 5.9 * Hawaii 93.5 96.3 2.8 * Idaho 90.7 93.8 3.1 * Illinois 94.2 91.8 -2.4 ** Indiana 91.6 93.8 2.3 * Iowa 96.2 95.8 -0.4 Kansas 94.3 93.8 -0.5 Kentucky 88.1 92.8 4.6 * Louisiana 89.7 91.5 1.9 Maine 93.4 97.2 3.8 * Maryland 95.7 95.3 -0.4 Massachusetts 95.9 95.4 -0.5 Michigan 92.8 94.2 1.3 Minnesota 95.8 96.9 1.1 Mississippi 82.4 88.0 5.6 * Missouri 91.5 95.6 4.1 * Montana 91.0 95.3 4.3 * Nebraska 95.7 95.9 0.2 Nevada 90.4 93.1 2.8 New Hampshire 94.3 97.0 2.7 * New
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrd99-7.pdf
    • 15.6 14.6 15.9 6.2 8.0 1982 10.8 9.0 2.7 3.9 4.2 1.7 1983 3.1 0.2 1.4 0.0 7.4 3.9 1984 17.2 10.4 -4.3 -5.1 3.6 3.8 1985 8.9 12.4 -3.7 -3.0 0.6 2.1 1986 7.1 8.9 -9.4 -10.0 0.3 -3.5 1987 3.3 2.6 -12.4 -11.8 -3.0 -3.0 1988 4.5 4.6 -4.2 -2.1 -4.2 -3.7 1989 0.6 1.9 -1.3 -1.7 -2.6 0.5 1990 1.0 1.5 -3.7 -0.1 -2.2 -2.2 1991 5.1 2.1 1.3 -1.3 -1.5 -2.6 1992 0.5 -0.2 -1.3 1.0 -2.4 1.3 1993 1.0 0.8 6.5 3.8 0.2 -1.1 1994 -0.3 0.7 5.4 6.1 -1.0 -1.4 1995 2.6 ** 0.1 ** -3.8 ** 1996 0.9 0.2 3.7 2.5 6.1 0.5 1997 1.0 0.2 -4.3 3.6 2.8 -4.0 1998 1.3 -0.1 -0.8
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrd99-9.pdf
    • Event in Thousands 338.0 319.4 946.9 1,452.3 786.5 256.6 242.2 165.3 763.3 Outage Line-Minutes per 1,000 Access Lines 698.2 283.3 4,184.5 3,484.5 687.7 3,134.6 1,275.9 2,034.2 5,756.6 For Scheduled Downtime More than 2 Minutes Number of Occurrences or Events 45 25 65 32 55 207 143 11 8 Events per Hundred Switches 3.1 2.2 3.9 2.5 6.8 12.2 9.9 0.2 0.5 Events per Million Access Lines 2.21 1.39 2.82 1.74 3.21 13.52 8.86 0.60 1.10 Average Outage Duration in Minutes 3.3 3.7 4.6 5.3 11.6 2.6 3.1 23.2 6.4 Avg. Lines Affected per Event in Thousands 10.6 33.1 31.4 45.3 37.2 8.7 11.3 9.0 35.7 Outage Line-Minutes per Event in Thousands 33.2 122.6 138.3 243.4 458.6 23.3 40.1 73.6 159.1 Outage
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrj99-1.pdf
    • calls 23a Provided as unbundled network elements or other 174.8 174.8 249.6 249.6 * * 424.4 424.4 contract arrangement 23b Provided under state or federal access tariff 8,358.8 9,348.217,707.0 70.6 43.6 114.2 8,429.4 9,391.717,821.2 Total per minute access charges 8,533.6 9,348.217,881.8 320.2 43.6 363.8 * * 8,853.9 9,391.718,245.6 24Local private line & special access 717.4 4,369.8 5,087.2 426.8 288.5 715.3 0.5 0.3 0.8 1,144.8 4,658.6 5,803.3 25Pay telephone compensation from toll carriers 120.2 154.9 275.0 4.5 5.0 9.5 77.3 60.0 137.2 201.9 219.8 421.8 26Other local telecommunications service revenues 253.2 48.1 301.3 90.3 22.2 112.5 343.5 70.3 413.8 27Universal service support receipts 377.6 1,016.7 1,394.3 1.7 3.1 4.7 379.3 1,019.7 1,399.0 Total fixed local service provided for resale 11,159.116,254.027,413.0 965.9 385.5
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrj99-2.pdf
    • 127 93,644 GRAND TOTALS $416,503,919 $41,779,335$2,558,875$3,093,173 $463,935,302 2 - 32 Table 2.4 Federal Low Income Programs Fund Size Projections for 1998 and 1999 (in Millions of Dollars) Low Income Programs 1998 Totals 1st Quarter - 1999 2nd Quarter - 1999 3rd Quarter - 1999 Lifeline Assistance $478.5 $128.6 $112.3 $111.4 Link-Up 27.7 13.0 11.3 9.8 Incremental Toll Limitation 6.5 0.8 0.5 0.5 PICC Reimbursement 1.9 0.8 0.7 0.9 Prior Period True-ups -14.3 0.8 -5.0 2.8 Administrative Expenses 1.7 0.5 0.5 0.5 Less Interest Income -3.2 -0.7 -0.8 -0.8 Total Low Income Programs $498.9 $143.8 $119.5 $125.1 Note: Detail may not match totals because of necessary rounding. Source: USAC quarterly filings: November 2, 1998, January 29, 1999, and April 28, 1999. 2
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrj99-3.pdf
    • Programs Fund Size Projections (in Millions of Dollars) High Cost Programs Total 1998 1st Quarter 19992nd Quarter 19993rd Quarter 1999 Universal Service Fund 831.0 216.1 217.1 207.2 Long Term Support 471.9 117.4 118.3 118.3 Local Switching Support 412.6 97.7 97.9 98.2 Prior Period True-ups -14.1 7.9 5.4 -1.2 Administrative Expenses 4.8 2.2 1.1 1.2 Less Interest Income -5.1 -0.9 -0.6 -0.5 Total High Cost Programs 1701.2 440.4 439.2 423.1 Note: Details may not appear to add to totals due to rounding 3 - 13 Table 3.8 Total Projected Support Payments for 1998 by State Universal Long Term Local Switching Total State or Jurisdiction Service Fund Support Support Support ALABAMA $21,947,616 $6,812,558 $10,153,266 $38,913,440 ALASKA $31,963,777 $16,287,535 $14,909,157 $63,160,470 ARIZONA $19,492,163 $2,996,004
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrj99-4.pdf
    • 4 - 64 Table 4.5 Schools and Libraries Program Fund Funding Period: January 1, 1998 through June 30, 1999 (Amounts shown in millions) Total: 1998 1998 1998 1998 1999 1999first funding Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 period 3/ 1) Fund Collections 1/ $201.3$315.0$319.9$330.4$327.6$216.7$1,710.9 2) Interest Income 0.8 4.9 9.8 12.1 14.9 14.7 57.3 Administration Expenses 2/ 3) Operating Expenses 0.5 0.6 0.6 0.7 0.4 0.8 3.6 4) USAC Administrative Expenses 0.1 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.3 1.4 5) Non-recurring (outside contractors) 1.1 2.4 0.6 0.4 1.1 0.6 6.2 6) NECA Contract (operations component) 2.9 3.9 3.0 3.5 7.1 5.1 25.5 7) Total Administrative Expenses (3)+(4)+(5)+(6) 4.6 7.2 4.4 4.8 8.9 6.8 36.7 8) Fund Outlays 2/ 2.1 2.9 5.9 11.5
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrj99-6.pdf
    • 88.0 1.4 California 92.5 95.2 2.7 * Colorado 93.2 95.0 1.8 Connecticut 95.5 95.5 -0.0 Delaware 94.3 96.7 2.4 * District of Columbia 94.9 91.0 -3.9 ** Florida 88.7 92.6 3.9 * Georgia 86.2 91.4 5.3 * Hawaii 93.5 95.4 1.9 * Idaho 90.7 93.3 2.6 * Illinois 94.2 92.7 -1.4 ** Indiana 91.6 94.4 2.8 * Iowa 96.2 96.7 0.5 Kansas 94.3 94.3 0.0 Kentucky 88.1 93.3 5.2 * Louisiana 89.7 92.3 2.6 * Maine 93.4 96.9 3.5 * Maryland 95.7 96.5 0.8 Massachusetts 95.9 94.5 -1.4 Michigan 92.8 95.0 2.1 * Minnesota 95.8 97.8 2.0 * Mississippi 82.4 89.5 7.1 * Missouri 91.5 94.6 3.1 * Montana 91.0 94.1 3.1 * Nebraska 95.7 96.2 0.5 Nevada 90.4 92.3 2.0
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrj99-7.pdf
    • 15.6 14.6 15.9 6.2 8.0 1982 10.8 9.0 2.7 3.9 4.2 1.7 1983 3.1 0.2 1.4 0.0 7.4 3.9 1984 17.2 10.4 -4.3 -5.1 3.6 3.8 1985 8.9 12.4 -3.7 -3.0 0.6 2.1 1986 7.1 8.9 -9.4 -10.0 0.3 -3.5 1987 3.3 2.6 -12.4 -11.8 -3.0 -3.0 1988 4.5 4.6 -4.2 -2.1 -4.2 -3.7 1989 0.6 1.9 -1.3 -1.7 -2.6 0.5 1990 1.0 1.5 -3.7 -0.1 -2.2 -2.2 1991 5.1 2.1 1.3 -1.3 -1.5 -2.6 1992 0.5 -0.2 -1.3 1.0 -2.4 1.3 1993 1.0 0.8 6.5 3.8 0.2 -1.1 1994 -0.3 0.7 5.4 6.1 -1.0 -1.4 1995 2.6 ** 0.1 ** -3.8 ** 1996 0.9 0.2 3.7 2.5 6.1 0.5 1997 1.0 0.2 -4.3 3.6 2.8 -4.0 1998 1.3 -0.1 -0.8
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrj99-8.pdf
    • TOTAL 1992 345.5 4.2 349.7 8 - 7 TABLE 8.4 INTERSTATE SWITCHED PREMIUM AND NON-PREMIUM ACCESS MINUTES (MINUTES SHOWN IN BILLIONS) PREMIUM NON-PREMIUM TOTAL MINUTES MINUTES MINUTES 1993FIRST QUARTER 89.8 0.9 90.6 SECOND QUARTER 90.4 0.8 91.2 THIRD QUARTER 92.9 0.7 93.6 FOURTH QUARTER 95.2 0.6 95.9 TOTAL 1993 368.3 3.0 371.2 1994FIRST QUARTER 98.1 0.6 98.7 SECOND QUARTER 97.4 0.5 97.9 THIRD QUARTER 101.4 0.5 101.9 FOURTH QUARTER 102.4 0.5 102.9 TOTAL 1994 399.3 2.1 401.4 1995FIRST QUARTER 105.1 0.4 105.6 SECOND QUARTER 106.4 0.4 106.8 THIRD QUARTER 108.6 0.4 109.0 FOURTH QUARTER 110.2 0.4 110.6 TOTAL 1995 430.3 1.6 431.9 1996FIRST QUARTER 115.3 0.3 115.7 SECOND QUARTER 114.4 0.3 114.7 THIRD QUARTER 117.2 0.3 117.5 FOURTH QUARTER 120.0 0.2
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrs00-0.pdf
    • Assistance $415.7 $437.5 $510.2 $117.6 $114.7 $122.9 $155.0 Link-Up 42.5 34.0 34.8 9.1 9.1 8.2 8.4 Incremental Toll Limitation 2.7 3.1 3.2 0.9 0.8 0.8 0.7 PICC Reimbursement 2.8 4.4 3.4 1.1 1.1 1.2 0.0 Prior Period True-ups 0.0 0.0 -13.3 -3.8 0.8 1.3 -11.6 Administrative Expenses 1.7 2.1 1.2 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 Less Interest Income -3.2 -4.4 -2.3 -0.5 -0.5 -0.5 -0.8 Total Low Income Programs $462.2 $476.7 $537.0 $124.7 $126.3 $134.1 $151.9 Note: Detail may not match totals because of necessary rounding. Source: USAC quarterly filings: November 2, 1999; January 30, 2000; May 2, 2000 (amended June 2, 2000); and August 2, 2000. Table 2.4 Federal Low Income Programs Fund Size Projections for 1999 and 2000 (in Millions
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrs00-0.pdf
    • areas pay for those services.1 The Commission's Universal Service rules permit eligible2 health care providers to receive support for any telecommunications service3 and for long distance charges for the distance between the rural health care provider and the nearest large city.4 The Commission defined "nearest large city" as the closest city in the state with a population of at least 50,000.5 In addition, any health care provider that cannot obtain toll-free Internet access is entitled to receive the lesser of $180 of toll charges per month, or the toll charges incurred for 30 hours per month, for telecommunications access to an Internet service provider.6 An eligible rural health care provider must first submit FCC Form 465 (description of services requested and
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrs01-0.pdf
    • 1999 Total 2000 1st Quarter - 2001 2nd Quarter - 2001 Lifeline Assistance $415.7 $437.5 $326.4 $158.7 $167.7 LinkUp 42.5 34.0 17.0 9.0 8.0 Incremental Toll Limitation 2.7 3.1 1.6 0.9 0.7 PICC Reimbursement 2.8 4.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 Prior Period True-Ups 0.0 0.0 -9.7 -3.8 -5.9 Administrative Expenses 1.7 2.1 0.8 0.4 0.4 Less Interest Income -3.2 -4.4 -1.3 -0.5 -0.8 Total Low-Income Programs $462.2 $476.7 $334.6 $164.4 $170.2 Note: Detail may not match totals because of necessary rounding. Source: USAC quarterly filings: November 2, 1999; January 30, 2000; May 2, 2000 (amended June 2, 2000); August 2, 2000; November 2, 2000; and February 6, 2001. Table 2.4 Federal Low-Income Programs Fund Size Projections for 1999, 2000 and 1st Two
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrs02-0.pdf
    • Pennsylvania 94.9 97.0 2.2 * Rhode Island 93.6 96.3 2.7 * South Carolina 83.7 94.5 10.8 * South Dakota 93.2 95.1 1.9 Tennessee 88.5 93.2 4.7 * Texas 88.4 93.8 5.4 * Utah 92.5 96.6 4.0 * Vermont 92.3 97.2 4.9 * Virginia 93.1 94.7 1.6 Washington 93.0 96.0 3.0 * West Virginia 87.7 93.5 5.8 * Wisconsin 95.2 95.8 0.5 Wyoming 89.9 93.8 3.9 * Total United States 91.6 94.9 3.3 * * Increase is statistically significant at the 95% confidence level. # Decrease is statistically significant at the 95% confidence level. Differences may not appear to equal changes due to rounding. 6 - 12 Chart 6.2 6 - 13 93.8% or less 93.9% - 95.9% 96.0% or more Average
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/QualSvc/qual00.pdf
    • 3.2 4.3 Outage Line-Minutes per Event in Thousands 602.0 515.5 690.4 3,200.7 342.3 835.4 1,711.9 154.1 538.3 Outage Line-Minutes per 1,000 Access Lines 2,412.1 2,659.1 1,214.2 875.2 210.2 874.6 1,656.9 1,162.3 8,129.4 For Scheduled Downtime More than 2 Minutes Number of Occurrences or Events 28 469 22 4 38 18 5 2 85 Events per Hundred Switches 1.7 32.8 1.5 0.5 2.3 1.4 0.4 0.0 6.3 Events per Million Access Lines 1.14 26.88 1.05 0.22 2.33 0.94 0.22 0.10 10.79 Average Outage Duration in Minutes 6.4 2.3 23.0 80.7 5.1 6.1 3.3 3.6 19.7 Avg. Lines Affected per Event in Thousands 21.9 10.4 20.5 48.9 38.7 41.1 32.1 9.5 10.9 Outage Line-Minutes per Event in Thousands 115.2 24.9 120.1 1,155.9 178.8
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/QualSvc/qual01.pdf
    • 1.9 2.8 2.2 1.5 1.8 1.3 SBC Southwestern 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.8 0.8 1.0 Verizon GTE 2.6 2.8 3.0 1.4 1.0 0.8 Verizon North 2.0 (Combined with Verizon South) Verizon South 1.5 1.4 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.1 Sprint 2.5 2.6 3.5 4.5 3.9 3.2 Chart 5 Average Installation Interval -- Local Services (Using Company Provided Composites) Residential Installation Intervals 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 4.0 4.5 5.0 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 Years Inte rval in D ays Composite Verizon BellSouth SBC Qwest Sprint 12 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 BellSouth 8.7 8.5 10.2 15.1 18.8 17.6 Qwest 10.6 7.1 8.3 13.9 8.0 10.0 SBC Ameritech 9.1 10.4 12.4 15.4 26.5 19.2 SBC Pacific 7.4 10.6
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/QualSvc/qual02.pdf
    • 2001 to about 173 reports per thousand lines in 2002. In 2002, the level of customer dissatisfaction with residential repairs declined for all but one reporting holding company, and the level of customer dissatisfaction with residential installations declined for two out of the four reporting holding companies. Average residential installation intervals for individual operating entities ranged from a low of 0.5 business days to a high of 2.1 business days in 2002, as compared to a low of 0.6 business days and a high of 3.2 business days in 2001. The report is available for reference in the FCC's Reference Information Center, Courtyard Level, 445 12th Street, S.W. Copies may be purchased by calling Qualex International at (202) 863-2893. The report
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/QualSvc/qual03.pdf
    • Installation Commitments Met Large Price-Cap Carriers 97.0 97.5 98.0 98.5 99.0 99.5 100.0 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 Years Percent o f Co mmitments M et Weighted BOC/Sprint Composite* Weighted Verizon Avg BellSouth Weighted SBC Avg. Qwest 13 ARMIS 43-05 Report 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 BellSouth 0.7 1.3 1.3 1.2 1.1 1.1 Qwest 1.0 1.1 1.0 0.6 0.5 0.4 SBC Ameritech 2.2 2.1 2.1 2.0 2.1 1.5 SBC Pacific 2.2 1.5 1.8 1.3 1.2 1.5 SBC Southwestern 0.7 0.8 0.8 2.2 1.8 1.9 SBC SNET 5.4 2.1 2.2 1.8 1.0 1.0 Verizon GTE 3.0 1.4 1.0 0.8 0.6 0.6 Verizon North (Combined with Verizon South) Verizon South 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.1 1.0 1.1 Sprint 3.5 4.5 3.9 3.2
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/QualSvc/qual98.pdf
    • Event in Thousands 338.0 319.4 946.9 1,452.3 786.5 256.6 242.2 165.3 763.3 Outage Line-Minutes per 1,000 Access Lines 698.2 283.3 4,184.5 3,484.5 687.7 3,134.6 1,275.9 2,034.2 5,756.6 For Scheduled Downtime More than 2 Minutes Number of Occurrences or Events 45 25 65 32 55 207 143 11 8 Events per Hundred Switches 3.1 2.2 3.9 2.5 6.8 12.2 9.9 0.2 0.5 Events per Million Access Lines 2.21 1.39 2.82 1.74 3.21 13.52 8.86 0.60 1.10 Average Outage Duration in Minutes 3.3 3.7 4.6 5.3 11.6 2.6 3.1 23.2 6.4 Avg. Lines Affected per Event in Thousands 10.6 33.1 31.4 45.3 37.2 8.7 11.3 9.0 35.7 Outage Line-Minutes per Event in Thousands 33.2 122.6 138.3 243.4 458.6 23.3 40.1 73.6 159.1 Outage
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/SOCC/00socc.pdf
    • SDR 0.85 SDR 0.85 SDR 0.72 SDR $0.85 $0.71 $0.51 $0.38 Mexico 11/ $0.89 $0.791 $0.75 $0.715 $0.68 $0.58 $0.53 $0.485 $0.395 $0.37 $0.19 $0.19 $0.19 Morocco 2.5 SDR 2.5 SDR 2.5 SDR 2.2 SDR 2.2 SDR 2.2 SDR 1.2 SDR 1.0 SDR 0.8 SDR 0.6 SDR 0.6 SDR 0.6 SDR 0.6 SDR Netherlands 1.1 SDR 1.1 SDR 0.9 SDR 0.5 SDR 0.5 SDR 0.4 SDR 0.25 SDR 0.25 SDR 0.2 SDR 0.14 SDR 0.1 SDR 0.1 SDR 0.1 SDR Nigeria $1.50 $1.50 $1.50 $1.50 $1.50 $1.50 $1.50 $1.50 $1.50 $1.40 $1.15 0.6 SDR 0.6 SDR Pakistan $2.55 $2.30 $2.30 $2.30 $2.30 $2.30 $2.30 $2.20 $2.00 $1.20 $1.20 $0.84 $0.72 Peru $2.00 $2.00 $2.00 $1.50 $1.40 $1.30 $1.30 $1.23 $1.00 $0.85
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/SOCC/01socc.pdf
    • $2.10 $1.90 $1.60 $1.440.95 SDR0.85 SDR0.85 SDR0.72 SDR $0.85 $0.71 $0.51 $0.38 $0.38 Mexico 11/ $0.79 $0.75 $0.72 $0.68 $0.58 $0.53 $0.49 $0.40 $0.37 $0.19 $0.19 $0.19 $0.19 Morocco 2.5 SDR 2.5 SDR 2.2 SDR 2.2 SDR 2.2 SDR 1.2 SDR 1.0 SDR 0.8 SDR 0.6 SDR 0.6 SDR 0.6 SDR 0.6 SDR 0.6 SDR Netherlands 1.1 SDR 0.9 SDR 0.5 SDR 0.5 SDR 0.4 SDR 0.25 SDR0.25 SDR 0.2 SDR 0.14 SDR 0.1 SDR 0.1 SDR 0.1 SDR 0.1 SDR Nigeria $1.50 $1.50 $1.50 $1.50 $1.50 $1.50 $1.50 $1.50 $1.40 $1.150.6 SDR 0.4 SDR 0.4 SDR Pakistan $2.30 $2.30 $2.30 $2.30 $2.30 $2.30 $2.20 $2.00 $1.20 $1.20 $0.84 $0.54 $0.54 Peru $2.00 $2.00 $1.50 $1.40 $1.30 $1.30 $1.23 $1.00 $0.85
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/SOCC/02socc.pdf
    • NA 0.3 0.3 NA Alabama 883.0 0.2 882.8 882.8 AL Arizona 950.2 950.2 950.2 AZ Arkansas 377.4 377.4 377.4 AR California 6,008.2 16.0 5,992.1 5,992.1 CA Colorado 1,030.1 1,030.1 1,030.1 CO Connecticut 733.3 733.3 733.3 CT Delaware 172.6 172.6 172.6 DE District of Columbia 258.4 258.4 257.7 0.7 NA NA 0.7 0.7 DC Florida 3,689.2 3,689.2 3,689.1 FL Georgia 2,004.3 0.5 2,003.9 2,003.9 GA Hawaii 259.5 (0.1) 259.6 259.6 HI Idaho 239.2 239.2 239.2 ID Illinois 2,255.6 (0.2) 2,255.7 2,255.7 IL Indiana 1,157.0 (0.1) 1,157.1 1,157.1 IN Iowa 295.5 295.5 295.5 IA Kansas 432.2 432.2 432.2 KS Kentucky 658.0 0.1 657.9 657.8 0.1 NA NA 0.1 0.1 KY Louisiana 1,060.3 0.1 1,060.2 1,060.2 LA Maine 252.1 252.1 252.1 ME Maryland 1,263.5
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/SOCC/02socc.pdf
    • PA Rhode Island 104.5 1.7 102.9 6.9 96.0 47.6 11.6 36.8 96.0 RI South Carolina 380.2 6.8 373.3 68.1 305.2 144.4 34.5 118.0 296.9 8.3 SC South Dakota 74.7 1.2 73.6 18.5 55.1 15.5 9.7 28.1 53.3 1.8 SD Tennessee 538.0 11.2 526.8 36.9 489.8 212.1 62.8 199.9 474.8 15.1 TN Texas 2,674.9 30.2 2,644.6 593.2 2,051.4 782.1 189.0 1,029.4 2,000.5 51.0 TX Utah 278.7 5.5 273.1 34.0 239.1 74.7 32.5 122.0 229.2 9.9 UT Vermont 82.5 1.0 81.4 9.0 72.4 30.8 14.6 27.1 72.5 VT Virginia 1,238.6 15.4 1,223.2 248.8 974.4 419.6 109.5 445.0 974.1 0.4 VA Washington 1,026.4 33.4 993.0 221.6 771.4 307.1 86.8 357.7 751.6 19.8 WA West Virginia 211.3 2.3 209.0 31.6 177.4 89.0 25.2 63.1 177.3
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/SOCC/03socc.pdf
    • Hampshire 204.4 204.4 204.4 NH New Jersey 1,427.7 1,427.7 1,427.7 NJ New Mexico 313.5 313.5 313.5 NM New York 3,752.3 3,752.3 3,752.3 NY North Carolina 1,639.3 0.4 1,638.9 1,638.9 NC North Dakota 64.6 64.6 64.6 ND Ohio 2,064.9 0.9 2,064.0 2,063.7 0.3 NA NA 0.3 0.3 OH Oklahoma 563.7 563.7 563.7 OK Oregon 591.5 6.0 585.5 585.5 OR Pennsylvania 1,856.5 0.5 1,855.9 1,855.8 0.2 NA NA 0.2 0.2 PA Rhode Island 155.2 155.2 155.2 RI South Carolina 716.2 0.6 715.6 715.6 SC South Dakota 72.5 72.5 72.5 SD Tennessee 1,099.6 1,099.6 1,099.6 TN Texas 4,055.9 2.9 4,053.0 4,053.0 TX Utah 307.7 307.7 307.7 UT Vermont 128.9 128.9 128.9 VT Virginia 1,369.3 0.6 1,368.7 1,367.5 1.2 NA NA 1.2 1.2 VA Washington
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/SOCC/95socc.pdf
    • 3.83 3.83 AL ARIZONA 93.4 0.092 93.3 92.5 0.84 0.84 AZ ARKANSAS 105.2 0.408 104.7 104.0 0.72 0.72 AR CALIFORNIA 1,727.4 (0.035) 1,727.4 1,724.1 3.30 3.30 CA COLORADO 113.8 0.003 113.8 113.8 0.01 0.01 CO CONNECTICUT 273.3 273.3 267.1 6.22 6.22 CT DELAWARE 31.8 31.8 14.7 17.10 2.1 3.9 5.9 11.18 DE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA 3.9 (0.131) 4.1 (0.0) 4.09 0.5 0.8 1.3 2.79 DC FLORIDA 440.6 0.127 440.5 439.9 0.59 0.59 FL GEORGIA 134.5 0.011 134.5 129.4 5.07 5.07 GA HAWAII 81.4 32.676 48.7 48.8 (0.08) (0.08) HI IDAHO 71.3 1.236 70.1 67.5 2.60 2.60 ID ILLINOIS 289.8 11.895 277.9 233.6 44.23 44.23 IL INDIANA 228.7 9.197 219.5 199.3 20.16 20.16 IN IOWA 115.6 0.809 114.8 110.4 4.35 4.35 IA
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/SOCC/96socc.pdf
    • SHARE (BASED ON REVENUES OF LONG DISTANCE CARRIERS ONLY) ALL OTHER YEAR AT&T MCI SPRINT WORLDCOM LONG DISTANCE CARRIERS 1984 90.1% 4.5% 2.7% 2.6% 1985 86.3 5.5 2.6 5.6 1986 81.9 7.6 4.3 6.3 1987 78.6 8.8 5.8 6.8 1988 74.6 10.3 7.2 8.0 1989 67.5 12.1 8.4 0.2% 11.8 1990 65.0 14.2 9.7 0.3 10.8 1991 63.2 15.2 9.9 0.5 11.3 1992 60.8 16.7 9.7 1.4 11.5 1993 58.1 17.8 10.0 1.9 12.3 1994 55.2 17.4 10.1 3.3 14.0 1995 51.8 19.7 9.8 4.9 13.8 1996 47.9 20.0 9.7 5.5 17.0 TABLE 1.6--TOTAL TOLL SERVICE REVENUES - MARKET SHARE (BASED ON REVENUES OF ALL LONG DISTANCE TOLL PROVIDERS) ALL OTHER BELL OTHER LONG OPERATING LOCAL DISTANCE COMPANIES TELEPHONE AT&T MCI
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/SOCC/97socc.pdf
    • SHARE (BASED ON REVENUES OF LONG DISTANCE CARRIERS ONLY) ALL OTHER YEAR AT&T MCI SPRINT WORLDCOM LONG DISTANCE CARRIERS 1984 90.1% 4.5% 2.7% 2.6% 1985 86.3 5.5 2.6 5.6 1986 81.9 7.6 4.3 6.3 1987 78.6 8.8 5.8 6.8 1988 74.6 10.3 7.2 8.0 1989 67.5 12.1 8.4 0.2% 11.8 1990 65.0 14.2 9.7 0.3 10.8 1991 63.2 15.2 9.9 0.5 11.3 1992 60.8 16.7 9.7 1.4 11.5 1993 58.1 17.8 10.0 1.9 12.3 1994 55.2 17.4 10.1 3.3 14.0 1995 51.8 19.7 9.8 4.9 13.8 1996 47.9 20.0 9.7 5.5 17.0 1997 44.5 19.4 9.7 6.7 19.8 TABLE 1.6--TOTAL TOLL SERVICE REVENUES - MARKET SHARE (BASED ON REVENUES OF ALL LONG DISTANCE TOLL PROVIDERS) ALL OTHER BELL OTHER LONG OPERATING
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/SOCC/97socc.pdf
    • 1,073.9 0.149 LA MAINE 1,411.0 43.6 1,367.4 1,002.0 365.5 186.9 124.7 53.8 365.5 ME MARYLAND 5,791.2 259.3 5,531.9 3,977.1 1,554.8 737.1 340.9 476.7 1,554.8 MD MASSACHUSETTS 8,357.6 377.3 7,980.2 5,712.3 2,268.0 880.7 765.9 621.3 2,268.0 MA MICHIGAN 9,888.0 263.2 9,624.8 7,434.6 2,190.2 1,274.3 570.4 343.8 2,188.5 1.730 MI MINNESOTA 3,834.3 77.6 3,756.7 2,757.6 999.1 528.3 221.0 249.8 999.1 MN MISSISSIPPI 3,000.5 80.8 2,919.7 2,183.7 736.0 490.4 149.2 95.7 735.3 0.767 MS MISSOURI 6,839.4 259.6 6,579.8 4,748.1 1,831.7 978.4 381.0 471.3 1,830.7 0.976 MO MONTANA 759.7 24.4 735.3 512.2 223.1 117.1 59.7 46.4 223.1 MT NEBRASKA 2,124.1 123.4 2,000.7 1,411.7 589.0 251.1 170.6 166.6 588.3 0.659 NE NEVADA 1,627.2 128.7 1,498.6 1,077.6 420.9 198.3 180.2 42.4 420.9 0.006 NV NEW HAMPSHIRE 1,603.0
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/SOCC/98SOCC.PDF
    • (BASED ON REVENUES OF LONG DISTANCE CARRIERS ONLY) ALL OTHER YEAR AT&T MCI WORLDCOM SPRINT LONG DISTANCE MCI WORLDCOM CARRIERS 1984 90.1% 4.5% 2.7% 2.6% 1985 86.3 5.5 2.6 5.6 1986 81.9 7.6 4.3 6.3 1987 78.6 8.8 5.8 6.8 1988 74.6 10.3 7.2 8.0 1989 67.5 12.1 0.2% 8.4 11.8 1990 65.0 14.2 0.3 9.7 10.8 1991 63.2 15.2 0.5 9.9 11.3 1992 60.8 16.7 1.4 9.7 11.5 1993 58.1 17.8 1.9 10.0 12.3 1994 55.2 17.4 3.3 10.1 14.0 1995 51.8 19.7 4.9 9.8 13.8 1996 47.9 20.0 5.5 9.7 17.0 1997 43.8 19.0 6.7 9.5 19.8 1998 43.1 25.6 10.5 20.8 TABLE 1.6--TOTAL TOLL SERVICE REVENUES - MARKET SHARE (BASED ON REVENUES OF ALL LONG DISTANCE TOLL PROVIDERS)
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/SOCC/98SOCC.PDF
    • 235.4 2,687.5 1,923.2 764.3 380.2 142.8 185.9 708.9 55.4 VA WASHINGTON 2,230.7 171.6 2,059.1 1,458.8 600.3 298.2 136.6 135.1 569.9 30.4WA WEST VIRGINIA 586.7 18.8 567.8 416.0 151.9 88.7 30.2 23.9 142.7 9.1WV WISCONSIN 1,563.9 87.3 1,476.6 1,092.8 383.8 183.1 94.2 94.8 372.0 11.7 WI WYOMING 176.1 8.4 167.7 116.3 51.4 19.3 17.7 12.9 49.9 1.5WY PUERTO RICO 1,195.1 194.6 1,000.5 695.4 305.1 159.3 66.4 66.8 292.5 12.6 PR UNCLASSIFIED (0.0) (0.0) 166 STATISTICS OF COMMUNICATIONS COMMON CARRIERS TABLE 2.13 - REVENUES OF REPORTING LOCAL EXCHANGE CARRIERS FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1998 - - CONTINUED BASIC LOCAL SERVICE REVENUE ( DOLLAR AMOUNTS SHOWN IN MILLIONS ) A C C E S S BILLING & T O T A L
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/SOCC/99socc.pdf
    • (Based on Revenues of Long Distance Carriers Only) All Other Year AT&T MCI WorldCom Sprint Long Distance MCI WorldCom Carriers 1984 90.1% 4.5% 2.7% 2.6% 1985 86.3 5.5 2.6 5.6 1986 81.9 7.6 4.3 6.3 1987 78.6 8.8 5.8 6.8 1988 74.6 10.3 7.2 8.0 1989 67.5 12.1 0.2% 8.4 11.8 1990 65.0 14.2 0.3 9.7 10.8 1991 63.2 15.2 0.5 9.9 11.3 1992 60.8 16.7 1.4 9.7 11.5 1993 58.1 17.8 1.9 10.0 12.3 1994 55.2 17.4 3.3 10.1 14.0 1995 51.8 19.7 4.9 9.8 13.8 1996 47.9 20.0 5.5 9.7 17.0 1997 43.8 19.0 6.7 9.5 19.8 1998 43.1 23.5 8.5 24.9 1999 40.9 23.8 9.9 25.3 Table 1.6 - Total Toll Service Revenues: Market Share (Based on Revenues
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/SOCC/99socc.pdf
    • 1999 -- Continued Network Access Service Revenues (Dollar Amounts Shown in Millions) Total Non- Subject to State Interstate Access Billing & RegulatedSeparations Collection and Common Traffic Special Total and Adjustments Line Sensitive Interexchange All Reporting Cos. $35,461.7 $453.2 $35,008.5$8,223.3$26,785.2$13,731.5$5,758.1$7,281.5$26,771.1 $14.1 Bell Operating Cos. 27,071.3 350.8 26,720.5 5,194.0 21,526.510,502.2 4,757.6 6,252.721,512.4 14.1 All Other Cos. 8,390.4 102.4 8,288.0 3,029.3 5,258.7 3,229.3 1,000.5 1,028.9 5,258.7 Alabama 413.7 4.61 409.1 55.3 353.8 205.3 77.1 71.0 353.4 0.401 AL Arizona 609.3 13.63 595.6 123.5 472.1 239.7 107.4 125.0 472.1 AZ Arkansas 245.4 1.21 244.2 58.8 185.4 91.4 42.6 51.4 185.4 AR California 4,181.3 102.92 4,078.4 1,250.9 2,827.5 1,454.6 569.2 803.8 2,827.5 CA Colorado 616.2 12.70 603.5 99.8 503.7 236.0 114.0 153.7 503.7 CO Connecticut 435.7
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/SOCC/prelim02socc.pdf
    • 186.5 67.1 23.5 90.2 180.8 5.6 AR California 4,702.9 35.3 4,667.7 1,380.4 3,287.3 1,431.9 308.7 1,464.8 3,205.4 81.8 CA Colorado 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 CO Connecticut 520.1 520.1 38.0 482.1 164.4 73.9 229.2 467.5 14.7 CT Delaware 119.0 1.8 117.2 5.8 111.4 40.7 12.0 58.6 111.3 0.1 DE District of Columbia 242.9 2.7 240.2 0.5 239.7 59.0 25.7 154.9 239.6 0.1 DC Florida 2,714.8 35.5 2,679.3 584.7 2,094.6 940.7 225.0 892.0 2,057.7 36.9 FL Georgia 1,112.7 22.0 1,090.7 113.4 977.3 343.8 114.9 494.8 953.5 23.8 GA Hawaii 169.1 3.1 166.0 29.2 136.8 63.5 20.1 52.6 136.2 0.6 HI Idaho 60.5 0.6 59.9 9.8 50.1 30.8 4.9 14.4 50.1 0.0 ID Illinois 1,266.7 3.5 1,263.2 248.5
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/SOCC/prelim02socc.pdf
    • PA Rhode Island 104.5 1.7 102.9 6.9 96.0 47.6 11.6 36.8 96.0 RI South Carolina 381.1 7.8 373.3 68.1 305.2 144.4 34.5 118.0 296.9 8.3 SC South Dakota 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 SD Tennessee 537.9 11.1 526.8 36.9 489.8 212.1 62.8 199.9 474.8 15.1 TN Texas 2,674.9 30.2 2,644.6 593.2 2,051.4 782.1 189.0 1,029.4 2,000.5 51.0 TX Utah 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 UT Vermont 82.5 1.0 81.4 9.0 72.4 30.8 14.6 27.1 72.5 VT Virginia 1,238.6 15.4 1,223.2 248.8 974.4 419.6 109.5 445.0 974.1 0.4 VA Washington 447.7 20.5 427.2 137.5 289.7 143.8 23.1 122.8 289.7 0.0 WA West Virginia 211.3 2.3 209.0 31.6 177.4 89.0 25.2 63.1 177.3
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/scard98.pdf
    • of the total number of complaints and inquiries processed by the Branch during this time period. Figure 8 shows the complaint indices for the 16 companies that were served more than 25 OSP complaints during 1997, and that filed Universal Service Fund worksheets by May 11, 1998. The group complaint indices for these companies range from 8.2 to less than 0.5 complaints per million dollars of OSP revenues. The four OSP companies with the lowest and best complaint index are listed in Group 12. The 12 OSP companies with the highest complaint indices are listed in Groups 1, 2 and 3. Appendix D to this Scorecard lists for each company included in Figure 6 the total number of OSP complaints served,
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Compliance/Orders/1997/fcc97218.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Compliance/Orders/1997/fcc97218.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Compliance/Orders/1997/fcc97218.txt
    • of assessing reasonable forfeitures to ensure substantial compliance by licensees and therefore, the amounts should be reduced. In support, they noted that common carrier forfeitures issued before the statutory increase were seldom more than 25 percent of the maximum, and that forfeitures assessed after the statutory increase but before the implementation of the prior policy statement were no more than 0.5 percent of the new one million dollar maximum. Emery Comments, 11-12. NAB and MCI also agreed that the base amounts suggested in the proposed forfeiture guidelines were too high and should be reduced by 50 percent with the exception of tower safety violations. NAB Comments, 5; MCI Reply Comments, 3. 19. The legislative history of Section 503 of the Act
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Documents/bulletins/oet56/oet56e4.pdf
    • Thesatellitesreceivethesignalsbeameduptothemand,inturn,retransmitthesignalsback downtoanearthboundreceivingstation.Thesesignalsallowdeliveryofavarietyof communicationsservices,includinglongdistancetelephoneservice.Somesatellite-earth stationantennasareusedonlytoreceiveRFsignals(i.e.,justlikearooftoptelevisionantenna usedataresidence),and,sincetheydonottransmit,RFexposureisnotanissue. 19 Sincesatellite-earthstationantennasaredirectedtowardsatellitesabovetheearth, transmittedbeamspointskywardatvariousanglesofinclination,dependingontheparticular satellitebeingused.Becauseofthelongerdistancesinvolved,powerlevelsusedtotransmit thesesignalsarerelativelylargewhencompared,forexample,tothoseusedbythe microwavepoint-to-pointantennasdiscussedabove.However,aswithmicrowaveantennas, thebeamsusedfortransmittingearth-to-satellitesignalsareconcentratedandhighly directional,similartothebeamfromaflashlight.Inaddition,publicaccesswouldnormally berestrictedatstationsiteswhereexposurelevelscouldapproachorexceedsafelimits. Althoughmanysatellite-earthstationsare"fixed"sites,portableuplinkantennasare alsoused,e.g.,forelectronicnewsgathering.Theseantennascanbedeployedinvarious locations.Therefore,precautionsmaybenecessary,suchastemporarilyrestrictingaccessin thevicinityoftheantenna,toavoidexposuretothemaintransmittedbeam.Ingeneral, however,itisunlikelythatatransmittingearthstationantennawouldroutinelyexpose membersofthepublictopotentiallyharmfullevelsofmicrowaves. ARECELLULARANDPCSTOWERSANDANTENNASSAFE?WHAT ABOUTCARPHONESANDHAND-HELDPHONES? BaseStations Cellularradiosystemsusefrequenciesbetween800and900megahertz(MHz). TransmittersinthePersonalCommunicationsService(PCS)usefrequenciesintherangeof 1850-1990MHz.TheantennasforcellularandPCStransmissionsaretypicallylocatedon towers,watertanksorotherelevatedstructuresincludingrooftopsandthesidesofbuildings. Thecombinationofantennasandassociatedelectronicequipmentisreferredtoasacellular orPCS"basestation"or"cellsite."Typicalheightsforfree-standingbasestationtowersor structuresare50-200feet.Acellularbasestationmayutilizeseveral"omni-directional" antennasthatlooklikepoles,10to15feetinlength,althoughthesetypesofantennasare becominglesscommoninurbanareas. Inurbanandsuburbanareas,cellularandPCSserviceprovidersnowmorecommonly use"sector"antennasfortheirbasestations.Theseantennasarerectangularpanels,e.g., about1by4feetindimension,typicallymountedonarooftoporotherstructure,buttheyare alsomountedontowersorpoles.Theantennasareusuallyarrangedinthreegroupsofthree each.Oneantennaineachgroupisusedtotransmitsignalstomobileunits(carphonesor hand-heldphones),andtheothertwoantennasineachgroupareusedtoreceivesignalsfrom mobileunits. TheFCCauthorizescellularandPCScarriersinvariousserviceareasaroundthe country.Atacellsite,thetotalRFpowerthatcouldbetransmittedfromeachtransmitting antennaatacellsitedependsonthenumberofradiochannels(transmitters)thathavebeen 20 authorizedandthepowerofeachtransmitter.Typically,foracellularbasestation,a maximumof21channelspersector(dependingonthesystem)couldbeused.Thus,fora typicalcellsiteutilizingsectorantennas,eachofthethreetransmittingantennascouldbe connectedtoupto21transmittersforatotalof63transmitterspersite.Whenomni- directionalantennasareused,upto96transmitterscouldbeimplementedatacellsite,but thiswouldbeunusual.Whileatypicalbasestationcouldhaveasmanyas63transmitters, notallofthetransmitterswouldbeexpectedtooperatesimultaneouslythusreducingoverall emissionlevels.ForthecaseofPCSbasestations,fewertransmittersarenormallyrequired duetotherelativelygreaternumberofbasestations. AlthoughtheFCCpermitsaneffectiveradiatedpower(ERP)ofupto500wattsper channel(dependingonthetowerheight),themajorityofcellularbasestationsinurbanand suburbanareasoperateatanERPof100wattsperchannelorless.AnERPof100watts correspondstoanactualradiatedpowerofabout5-10watts,dependingonthetypeof antennaused(ERPisnotequivalenttothepowerthatisradiatedbut,rather,isaquantitythat takesintoconsiderationtransmitterpowerandantennadirectivity).Asthecapacityofa systemisexpandedbydividingcells,i.e.,addingadditionalbasestations,lowerERPsare normallyused.Inurbanareas,anERPof10wattsperchannel(correspondingtoaradiated powerof0.5-1watt)orlessiscommonlyused.ForPCSbasestations,evenlowerradiated powerlevelsarenormallyused. ThesignalfromacellularorPCSbasestationantennaisessentiallydirectedtoward thehorizoninarelativelynarrowpatternintheverticalplane.Theradiationpatternforan omni-directionalantennamightbecomparedtoathindoughnutorpancakecenteredaround theantennawhilethepatternforasectorantennaisfan-shaped,likeawedgecutfromapie. Aswithallformsofelectromagneticenergy,thepowerdensityfromacellularorPCS transmitterdecreasesrapidly(accordingtoaninversesquarelaw)asonemovesawayfrom theantenna.Consequently,normalground-levelexposureismuchlessthanexposuresthat mightbeencounteredifonewereveryclosetotheantennaandinitsmaintransmittedbeam. MeasurementsmadeneartypicalcellularandPCSinstallations,especiallythosewith tower-mountedantennas,haveshownthatground-levelpowerdensitiesarewellbelowlimits recommendedbyRF/microwavesafetystandards(References32,37,and45).Forexample, forabase-stationtransmittingfrequencyof869MHztheFCC'sRFexposureguidelines recommendaMaximumPermissibleExposurelevelforthepublic("general population/uncontrolled"exposure)ofabout580microwattspersquarecentimeter(µW/cm2). ThislimitismanytimesgreaterthanRFlevelsfoundnearthebaseoftypicalcellulartowers orinthevicinityoflower-poweredcellularbasestationtransmitters,suchasmightbe mountedonrooftopsorsidesofbuildings.Measurementdataobtainedfromvarioussources haveconsistentlyindicatedthat"worst-case"ground-levelpowerdensitiesneartypicalcellular towersareontheorderof1µW/cm2orless(usuallysignificantlyless).Calculations correspondingtoa"worst-case"situation(alltransmittersoperatingsimultaneouslyand continuouslyatthemaximumlicensedpower)showthatinordertobeexposedtolevelsnear theFCC'slimitsforcellularfrequencies,anindividualwouldessentiallyhavetoremainin 21 themaintransmittingbeam(attheheightoftheantenna)andwithinafewfeetfromthe antenna.Thismakesitextremelyunlikelythatamemberofthegeneralpubliccouldbe exposedtoRFlevelsinexcessoftheseguidelinesduetocellularbasestationtransmitters. ForPCSbasestationtransmitters,thesametypeofanalysisholds,exceptthatatthePCS transmittingfrequencies(1850-1990MHz)theFCC'sexposurelimitsforthepublicare1000 µW/cm2.Therefore,therewouldtypicallybeanevengreatersafetymarginbetweenactual publicexposurelevelsandrecognizedsafetylimits. WhencellularandPCSantennasaremountedatrooftoplocationsitispossiblethat ambientRFlevelsgreaterthan1µW/cm2couldbepresentontherooftopitself.However, exposuresapproachingorexceedingthesafetyguidelinesareonlylikelytobeencountered veryclosetoordirectlyinfrontoftheantennas.Forsector-typeantennasRFlevelstothe sideandinbackoftheseantennasareinsignificant. EvenifRFlevelswerehigherthandesirableonarooftop,appropriaterestrictions couldbeplacedonaccess.Factoringinthetime-averagingaspectsofsafetystandardscould alsobeusedtoreducepotentialexposureofworkerswhomighthavetoaccessarooftopfor maintenancetasksorotherreasons.ThefactthatrooftopcellularandPCSantennasusually operateatlowerpowerlevelsthanantennasonfree-standingtowersmakesexcessive exposureconditionsonrooftopsunlikely.Inaddition,thesignificantsignalattenuationofa building'sroofminimizesanychanceforpersonslivingorworkingwithinthebuildingitself tobeexposedtoRFlevelsthatcouldapproachorexceedapplicablesafetylimits. Vehicle-MountedAntennas Vehicle-mountedantennasusedforcellularcommunicationsnormallyoperateata powerlevelof3wattsorless.Thesecellularantennasaretypicallymountedontheroof,on thetrunk,orontherearwindowofacarortruck.Studieshaveshownthatinordertobe exposedtoRFlevelsthatapproachthesafetyguidelinesitwouldbenecessarytoremainvery closetoavehicle-mountedcellularantennaforanextendedperiodoftime(Reference20). Studieshavealsoindicatedthatexposureofvehicleoccupantsisreducedbythe shieldingeffectofavehicle'smetalbody.Somemanufacturersofcellularsystemshave notedthatproperinstallationofavehicle-mountedantennaisaneffectivewaytomaximize thisshieldingeffectandhaverecommendedantennainstallationeitherinthecenterofthe rooforthecenterofthetrunk. Withrespecttorear-window-mountedcellularantennas,a minimumseparationdistanceof30-60cm(1to2feet)hasbeensuggestedtominimize exposuretovehicleoccupantsthatcouldresultfromantennamismatch. Therefore,properlyinstalled,vehicle-mounted,personalwirelesstransceiversusingup to3wattsofpowerresultinmaximumexposurelevelsinornearthevehiclethatarewell
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Documents/reports/dtvreprt.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Documents/reports/dtvreprt.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Documents/reports/dtvreprt.txt
    • 1 (s and -29 dB at +1.5 (s. Both COFDM and 8-VSB reception were described as good, with COFDM reception being more robust to antenna rotation. At the ``Panda Mall'' site, the spectrum was described as highly shaped with a deep null indicating a strong short delay echo. The channel impulse response showed significant multipath components at -10 dB at +0.5 (s, -25 dB at +1.5 (s, and -29 dB at +2 (s. At this location, both COFDM and 8-VSB reception were described as good. The Oak report also provided some indication of the signal propagation at the two sites visited by OET staff. The spectrum was described as ``poor'' at the Lombard street site. The channel impulse response showed many
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/News_Releases/1998/et8002a.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/News_Releases/1998/et8002a.txt http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/News_Releases/1998/et8002a.wp
    • 3.3 305.0 22274 17 22184 17 0.0 0.0 100.0 AK NORTH POLE 4 20 213.8 485.0 30801 79 30801 79 0.0 0.0 100.0 AK SITKA 13 2 1.0 33.0 6622 9 1132 8 0.0 0.0 100.0 AL ANNISTON 40 58 264.5 350.0 20802 1137 17127 616 0.2 0.0 98.0 AL BESSEMER 17 18 186.0 675.0 32102 1304 28690 1131 2.5 0.5 99.7 AL BIRMINGHAM 6 50 1000.0 420.0 35806 1598 34251 1547 0.0 0.0 96.5 AL BIRMINGHAM 10 53 1000.0 404.0 31917 1522 28399 1428 2.0 2.2 99.5 AL BIRMINGHAM 13 52 1000.0 408.0 32879 1564 29111 1465 0.0 0.0 99.5 AL BIRMINGHAM 42 30 166.3 421.0 26176 1333 23781 1253 0.4 0.4 100.0 AL BIRMINGHAM 68 36 50.0 314.0 14489
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Notices/1996/fcc96317.pdf
    • 18 24 50.0 223.0 12995 280 12953 280 4.6 1.7 100.0 AL DOZIER 2 48 5000.0 210.0 27038 479 22027 298 0.0 0.0 100.0 AL FLORENCE 15 18 69.0 223.0 11962 260 11868 259 1.6 0.8 100.0 AL FLORENCE 26 22 50.0 230.0 11631 250 10822 237 1.3 0.7 100.0 AL FLORENCE 36 20 50.0 221.0 12478 261 12231 259 0.5 0.1 100.0 AL GADSDEN 44 17 79.7 303.0 13141 620 12307 532 2.4 1.6 99.4 AL GADSDEN 60 38 364.1 352.0 16145 1194 15315 1165 1.0 0.9 100.0 AL HOMEWOOD 21 14 50.0 408.0 19022 1180 18302 1083 0.9 0.4 99.5 AL HUNTSVILLE 19 57 68.0 533.0 22865 824 22461 811 0.4 0.2 99.9 AL HUNTSVILLE 25 24 56.3 352.0
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Orders/1996/fcc96326.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Orders/1996/fcc96326.txt
    • determine compliance with the ANSI/IEEE guidelines for cellular telephones. Dr. Gandhi applied this model to ten cellular handsets from four different manufacturers and found that the peak SAR averaged over one gram of tissue ranged from 0.09 to 0.29 W/kg, considerably less than the 1.6 W/kg recommended by the standard. For the whole-body average SAR, Dr. Gandhi's results ranged from 0.5 to 1.1 mW/kg, depending on the telephone and antenna used. These values are 70 to 160 times smaller than the 80 mW/kg ANSI/IEEE recommended level. Sprint cites studies reported by the CTIA indicating that the SAR from a portable cellular telephone is approximately 0.45 W/kg (a value three and one-half times lower than the 1.6 W/kg limit recommended by ANSI/IEEE).
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Orders/1997/fc97115a.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Orders/1997/fc97115a.wp
    • 823 21115 792 0.7 0.3 100.0 ALHUNTSVILLE 54 41 51.1 515.0 18818 716 18097 704 0.7 0.3 100.0 B-7 DIGITALTELEVISION EXISTINGNTSC SERVICE ------------------------------------------ DTV/ DURINGTRANSITION CURRENTSERVICE NEWINTERFERENCE NTSC NTSCDTV DTV ANTENNA----------------- --------------- ----------------------- AREA STATEANDCITY CHANCHANPOWER HAAT AREA PEOPLE AREA PEOPLE AREA PEOPLE MATCH (kW) (m) (Sqkm)(thous) (Sqkm)(thous) (%NLArea)(%NLPop) (%) ALLOUISVILLE 43 42 155.7 275.0 14437 267 14481 267 1.0 0.5 99.4 ALMOBILE 5 27 1000.0 581.0 49660 1292 49268 1310 0.0 0.0 99.9 ALMOBILE 10 9 15.7 381.0 31801 1009 30422 998 0.0 0.0 100.0 ALMOBILE 15 26 312.3 521.0 25918 1007 25722 1039 1.8 1.0 99.8 ALMOBILE 21 20 190.4 436.0 21862 941 21326 882 0.3 0.1 100.0 ALMOBILE 42 18 50.0 183.0 11337 528 11453 533 0.5 0.1
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Orders/1997/fcc97303.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Orders/1997/fcc97303.txt http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Orders/1997/fcc97303.wp
    • between the radiating antennas and the body of the user or nearby persons. 20 Federal Communications Commission FCC 97-303 1.5 watts ERP was based on calculations of the approximate power level at which a device, such as a mobile cellular phone operating on frequencies around 800-900 MHz, would be expected to exceed the applicable MPE power density limit of about 0.5 mW/cm2 at a distance of 20 cm from the radiating antenna. For higher frequencies, above 1.5 GHz, the MPE limit for power density is less restrictive (1.0 mW/cm2), and, therefore, a less restrictive power exclusion threshold can be justified. Using similar calculations, a power exclusion threshold of 3 watts ERP is appropriate for mobile devices operating above 1.5 GHz. 51.
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Orders/1998/fc98024.pdf
    • "emissions mask" to require that: 1) in the first 500 kHz from the authorized channel edge, transmitter emissions must be attenuated no less than 47 dB below the average transmitted power; 2) more than 6 MHz from the channel edge, emissions must be attenuated no less than 110 dB below the average transmitted power; and 3) at any frequency between 0.5 and 6 MHz from the channel edge, emissions must be attenuated no less than the value determined by the following formula:65 Attenuation in dB = -11.5()f +3.6); where: )f = frequency difference in MHz from the edge of the channel. All attenuation limits are based on a measurement bandwidth of 500 kHz. This mask will lower Federal Communications Commission FCC
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Orders/1998/fc98024a.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Orders/1998/fc98024a.txt http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Orders/1998/fc98024a.wp
    • 3.3 305.0 22274 17 22184 17 0.0 0.0 100.0 AK NORTH POLE 4 20 213.8 485.0 30801 79 30801 79 0.0 0.0 100.0 AK SITKA 13 2 1.0 33.0 6622 9 1132 8 0.0 0.0 100.0 AL ANNISTON 40 58 264.5 350.0 20802 1137 17127 616 0.2 0.0 98.0 AL BESSEMER 17 18 186.0 675.0 32102 1304 28690 1131 2.5 0.5 99.7 AL BIRMINGHAM 6 50 1000.0 420.0 35806 1598 34251 1547 0.0 0.0 96.5 AL BIRMINGHAM 10 53 1000.0 404.0 31917 1522 28399 1428 2.0 2.2 99.5 AL BIRMINGHAM 13 52 1000.0 408.0 32879 1564 29111 1465 0.0 0.0 99.5 AL BIRMINGHAM 42 30 166.3 421.0 26176 1333 23781 1253 0.4 0.4 100.0 AL BIRMINGHAM 68 36 50.0 314.0 14489
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Orders/1999/da992743.pdf
    • FederalCommunicationsCommission DA99-2743 S5.454Differentcategoryofservice:inArmenia,Azerbaijan,Belarus,Bulgaria,Georgia, Kazakstan,Mongolia,Uzbekistan,Kyrgyzstan,RussianFederation,Tajikistan,Turkmenistanand Ukraine,theallocationoftheband5670-5725MHztothespaceresearchserviceisonaprimary basis(seeNo.S5.33). S5.455Additionalallocation:inArmenia,Azerbaijan,Belarus,Bulgaria,Cuba,Georgia, Hungary,Kazakstan,Latvia,Moldova,Mongolia,Uzbekistan,Poland,Kyrgyzstan,Slovakia, RussianFederation,Tajikistan,TurkmenistanandUkraine,theband5670-5850MHzisalso allocatedtothefixedserviceonaprimarybasis. S5.456Additionalallocation:inGermanyandinCameroon,theband5755-5850MHzis alsoallocatedtothefixedserviceonaprimarybasis. S5.458Intheband6425-7075MHz,passivemicrowavesensormeasurementsarecarried outovertheoceans.Intheband7075-7250MHz,passivemicrowavesensormeasurementsare carriedout.AdministrationsshouldbearinmindtheneedsoftheEarthexploration-satellite (passive)andspaceresearch(passive)servicesintheirfutureplanningofthebands6425- 7025MHzand7075-7250MHz. S5.458AInmakingassignmentsintheband6700-7075MHztospacestationsofthefixed- satelliteservice,administrationsareurgedtotakeallpracticablestepstoprotectspectralline observationsoftheradioastronomyserviceintheband6650-6675.2MHzfromharmful interferencefromunwantedemissions. S5.458BThespace-to-Earthallocationtothefixed-satelliteserviceintheband6700- 7075MHzislimitedtofeederlinksfornon-geostationarysatellitesystemsofthemobile-satellite serviceandissubjecttocoordinationunderNo.S9.11A.Theuseoftheband6700-7075MHz (space-to-Earth)byfeederlinksfornon-geostationarysatellitesystemsinthemobile-satellite serviceisnotsubjecttoNo.S22.2. S5.458CAdministrationsmakingsubmissionsintheband7025-7075MHz(Earth-to-space) forgeostationary-satellitesystemsinthefixed-satelliteserviceafter17November1995shall consultonthebasisofrelevantITU-RRecommendationswiththeadministrationsthathave notifiedandbroughtintousenon-geostationary-satellitesystemsinthisfrequencybandbefore 18November1995uponrequestofthelatteradministrations.Thisconsultationshallbewitha viewtofacilitatingsharedoperationofbothgeostationary-satellitesystemsinthefixed-satellite serviceandnon-geostationary-satellitesystemsinthisband. S5.459Additionalallocation:inRussianFederation,thefrequencybands7100-7155MHz and7190-7235MHzarealsoallocatedtothespaceoperationservice(Earth-to-space)ona primarybasis,subjecttoagreementobtainedunderNo.S9.21. S5.460Additionalallocation:theband7145-7235MHzisalsoallocatedtothespace research(Earth-to-space)serviceonaprimarybasis,subjecttoagreementobtainedunderNo. S9.21.Theuseoftheband7145-7190MHzisrestrictedtodeepspace;noemissionstodeep spaceshallbeeffectedintheband7190-7235MHz. S5.461Additionalallocation:thebands7250-7375MHz(space-to-Earth)and7900- 8025MHz(Earth-to-space)arealsoallocatedtothemobile-satelliteserviceonaprimarybasis, subjecttoagreementobtainedunderNo.S9.21. 164 FederalCommunicationsCommission DA99-2743 S5.461ATheuseoftheband7450-7550MHzbythemeteorological-satelliteservice(space- to-Earth)islimitedtogeostationary-satellitesystems.Non-geostationarymeteorological-satellite systemsinthisbandnotifiedbefore30November1997maycontinuetooperateonaprimary basisuntiltheendoftheirlifetime. S5.461BTheuseoftheband7750-7850MHzbythemeteorological-satelliteservice(space- to-Earth)islimitedtonon-geostationarysatellitesystems. S5.462AInRegions1and3(exceptforJapan),intheband8025-8400MHz,theearth exploration-satelliteserviceusinggeostationarysatellitesshallnotproduceapowerflux-density inexcessofthefollowingprovisionalvaluesforanglesofarrival( ),withouttheconsentofthe affectedadministration: ­174dB(W/m2)ina4kHzband for0o <5o ­174+0.5( ­5)dB(W/m2)ina4kHzband for5o <25o ­164dB(W/m2)ina4kHzband for25o 90o ThesevaluesaresubjecttostudyunderResolution124(WRC-97). S5.463Aircraftstationsarenotpermittedtotransmitintheband8025-8400MHz. S5.465Inthespaceresearchservice,theuseoftheband8400-8450MHzislimitedtodeep space. S5.466Differentcategoryofservice:inIsrael,Malaysia,SingaporeandSriLanka,the allocationoftheband8400-8500MHztothespaceresearchserviceisonasecondarybasis(see No.S5.32). S5.467Alternativeallocation:intheUnitedKingdom,theband8400-8500MHzisallocated totheradiolocationandspaceresearchservicesonaprimarybasis. S5.468Additionalallocation:inSaudiArabia,Bahrain,Bangladesh,BruneiDarussalam, Burundi,Cameroon,China,theCongo,CostaRica,Egypt,theUnitedArabEmirates,Gabon, Guyana,Indonesia,theIslamicRepublicofIran,Iraq,Jamaica,Jordan,Kuwait,Lebanon,Libya, Malaysia,Mali,Morocco,Mauritania,Nepal,Nigeria,Oman,Pakistan,Qatar,Syria,Democratic People'sRepublicofKorea,Senegal,Singapore,Somalia,Swaziland,Tanzania,Chad,Togo, TunisiaandYemen,theband8500-8750MHzisalsoallocatedtothefixedandmobileservices onaprimarybasis. S5.469Additionalallocation:inArmenia,Azerbaijan,Belarus,Bulgaria,Georgia,Hungary, Kazakstan,Lithuania,Moldova,Mongolia,Uzbekistan,Poland,Kyrgyzstan,Slovakia,theCzech Republic,Romania,RussianFederation,Tajikistan,TurkmenistanandUkraine,theband8500- 8750MHzisalsoallocatedtothelandmobileandradionavigationservicesonaprimarybasis. S5.469AIntheband8550-8650MHz,stationsintheearthexploration-satelliteservice (active)andspaceresearchservice(active)shallnotcauseharmfulinterferenceto,orconstrain theuseanddevelopmentof,stationsoftheradiolocationservice. S5.470Theuseoftheband8750-8850MHzbytheaeronauticalradionavigationserviceis limitedtoairborneDopplernavigationaidsonacentrefrequencyof8800MHz. S5.471Additionalallocation:inAlgeria,Germany,Bahrain,Belgium,China,theUnited ArabEmirates,France,Greece,Indonesia,theIslamicRepublicofIran,Libya,theNetherlands, QatarandSudan,thebands8825-8850MHzand9000-9200MHzarealsoallocatedtothe maritimeradionavigationservice,onaprimarybasis,forusebyshore-basedradarsonly. S5.472Inthebands8850-9000MHzand9200-9225MHz,themaritimeradionavigation serviceislimitedtoshore-basedradars. 165 FederalCommunicationsCommission DA99-2743 S5.473Additionalallocation:inArmenia,Austria,Azerbaijan,Belarus,Bulgaria,Cuba, Georgia,Hungary,Kazakstan,Moldova,Mongolia,Uzbekistan,Poland,Kyrgyzstan.Slovakia, theCzechRepublic,Romania,RussianFederation,Tajikistan,TurkmenistanandUkraine,the bands8850-9000MHzand9200-9300MHzarealsoallocatedtotheradionavigationserviceon aprimarybasis. S5.474Intheband9200-9500MHz,searchandrescuetransponders(SART)maybeused, havingdueregardtotheappropriateITU-RRecommendation(seealsoArticleS31). S5.475Theuseoftheband9300-9500MHzbytheaeronauticalradionavigationserviceis limitedtoairborneweatherradarsandground-basedradars.Inaddition,ground-basedradar beaconsintheaeronauticalradionavigationservicearepermittedintheband9300-9320MHz onconditionthatharmfulinterferenceisnotcausedtothemaritimeradionavigationservice.In theband9300-9500MHz,ground-basedradarsusedformeteorologicalpurposeshavepriority overotherradiolocationdevices. S5.476Intheband9300-9320MHzintheradionavigationservice,theuseofshipborne radars,otherthanthoseexistingon1January1976,isnotpermitteduntil1January2001. S5.476AIntheband9500-9800MHz,stationsintheearthexploration-satelliteservice (active)andspaceresearchservice(active)shallnotcauseharmfulinterferenceto,orconstrain theuseanddevelopmentof,stationsoftheradionavigationandradiolocationservices. S5.477Differentcategoryofservice:inAlgeria,SaudiArabia,Austria,Bahrain, Bangladesh,BruneiDarussalam,Cameroon,theRepublicofKorea,Egypt,theUnitedArab
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Orders/2000/fcc00233.doc
    • produced by emissions from a space station in the space operation, Earth exploration-satellite, or space research services that is transmitting in the space-to-space direction, for all conditions and all methods of modulation, shall not exceed the following values in any 4 kHz sub-band: -154 dBW/m2 for angles of arrival above the horizontal plane (() of 0° to 5°, -154 + 0.5((-5) dBW/m2 for ( of 5° to 25°, and -144 dBW/m2 for ( of 25° to 90°. * * * * * US346 Except as provided by footnote US222, the use of the band 2025-2110 MHz by the Government space operation service (Earth-to-space), Earth-exploration-satellite service (Earth-to-space), and space research service (Earth-to-space) shall not constrain the deployment of the Television Broadcast Auxiliary
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Orders/2000/fcc00418.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Orders/2000/fcc00418.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Orders/2000/fcc00418.txt
    • 119.0 Earth station location Denver, CO Washington, D.C. Seattle, WA Miami, FL DBS satellite e.i.r.p. towards the Earth station location dBW 48.8 52.6 46.7 52.6 Earth station elevation above mean sea level mm 1.58 0.01 0.01 0.0 Earth station elevation angle degrees 41.8 27.6 35.2 37.7 Free space loss dB 205.9 206.1 206.0 205.9 Earth station antenna miss-pointing error dB 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 Atmospheric absorption dB 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 Clear-sky receive system noise temperature Kelvin 85 85 85 85 Clear-sky earth station antenna G/T dB 14.5 14.5 14.5 14.5 C/I for other assignments in the BSS Plan dB 20.0 20.0 20.0 20.0 Clear-sky feeder link C/(N+I) dB 26.2 26.2 26.2 26.2 Clear-sky carrier-to-noise plus interference ratio dB 10.7 13.6
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Public_Notices/2001/d012072a.pdf
    • reliably achieved for significant interferers 22 Base Station Architecture 23 Antenna Arrays ! Wide variety of geometries and element types possible " arrangements of off-the-shelf single elements " custom arrays ! Array size " vertical extent determined by element gain/pattern as usual " horizontal extent, typically 3-5 lambda ! Array of eight 10 dBi elements at 2 GHz is about 0.5 x 0.75 m " small! " conformal arrays for aesthetics 24 Comments ! Fundamental concept is coherent processing ! Generally applicable to all air interfaces ! Parallel, independent processing on all traffic resources ! Many important issues that are not addressed here " estimation/prediction of radio environment (will comment later) " processing requirements & architectures (easily > 1Gbps array data
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/International/Notices/2000/fcc00369.doc
    • the Domestic Fixed-Satellite Service, 93 F.C.C. 2d 832, 837-38, ¶ 17 (1983). Sprint, at 4, observes that it uses satellite service exclusively to serve nearly 50 countries. See, e.g., Comsat Opposition at 11. Comsat states that a 100% excess bandwidth assignment allowance would not begin to satisfy needed frequency assignment flexibility. It observes that typical earth station carriers range from 0.5 to 36 MHz in occupied bandwidth and contends that the proposed demonstrated need rule would result in a tuning flexibility only on the order of 1 MHz for the narrowest, and 72 MHz for the widest, in this range, an amount of agility that would make carrier frequency relocation difficult because relocation often requires shifts of greater than 72 MHz.
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Notices/1997/fcc97360.pdf
    • calculated by dividing the number of simultaneous response station emitters in each regional class by the number of grid points in that region. As a check to determine if an adequate number of grid points has been created for performing interference analyses, Petitioners propose to establish a "measurement line" around each RSA, following the shape of the RSA boundary and 0.5 miles outside of it. Measurement points would be placed at intervals no greater than 0.5 miles along the measurement line.42 Petitioners would then divide all of the RSA grid points into two groups, checkerboard fashion, and calculate the power flux density from each the grid points of both groups at each point on the measurement line.43 Then, at each measurement
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Notices/1998/fcc98117.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Notices/1998/fcc98117.txt http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Notices/1998/fcc98117.wp
    • Station Assignments by Using Directional Antennas, Report and Order in MM Docket 87-121, 4 FCC Rcd 1681, 1687 (1989). 132 See 47 C.F.R. § 74.1203. 133 See 5 U.S.C. § 553(a)(1), (b)(3)(B); 47 C.F.R. § 1.412(c). 32 of class or location on the FM band.130 Commercial Class B and B1 FM stations, however, traditionally have received greater protection to their 0.5 mV/m (54 dBu) and 0.7 mV/m (57 dBu) contours, respectively.131 Accordingly, we propose to modify Section 73.509(b) to require Class D stations to protect commercial Class B and B1 stations, as well as NCE FM Class B and B1 stations operating on commercial channels, to their respective 54 dBu and 57 dBu contours. We invite comment as to whether Class
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Notices/2000/da000369.doc
    • C stations, the licensed facilities or the minimum Class C facilities, whichever is greater, should be considered. The area of reception service for full-time AM stations is defined according to whether it is a Class A AM station or another class of full-time AM station. For a Class A clear channel station, the reception area is defined by a station's 0.5 mv/m groundwave contour, based on its licensed facilities. With respect to all other classes of full-time AM stations, for allocation purposes, reception service is defined as that service received within a station's nighttime interference-free contour. Federal Communications Commission DA 00-369 Federal Communications Commission DA 00-369 k n ... ¶ ¸ Ð ì í 0 0 0 0 y } ~
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Notices/2000/da000736.doc
    • as the larger, more established community, is more deserving of a first competitive service than Point Arena. We believe that petitioner's proposal warrants consideration since the proposal could provide the community of Cloverdale with its firstor second local aural transmission service. An engineering analysis shows that Channel 296A can be allotted at Cloverdale at the petitioner's requested site 0.8 kilometers (0.5 miles) south of the community. Accordingly, we seek comment of the proposed amendment of the FM Table of Allotments, Section 73.202(b) of the Commission's Rules, for the communities listed below, to read as follows: Channel No. City Present Proposed Point Arena 296B1, 298B1 298B1 Cloverdale --- 296A The Commission's authority to institute rule making proceedings, showings required, cut-off procedures, and
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Notices/2000/da002146.doc
    • Woodville contends that the loss area is served in whole or part by some 32 or more AM and FM stations and that there are at least five or more services available in every location where KVLL-FM service will be lost, with no white or gray areas created. Additionally, Radio Woodville provided an engineering exhibit indicating that the interference free (0.5 mV/M) contours of 15 AM and FM stations in Louisiana and Texas completely encompass the loss area. 3. We believe Radio Woodville's proposal warrants consideration since the reallotment of Channel 234C2 from Woodville, Texas, to Wells, Texas, could provide the community of Wells with its first local service under our allotment priorities. In addition, the proposed reallotment and change of
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Notices/2001/fcc01329.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Notices/2001/fcc01329.txt
    • Syracuse, NY 78 Auburn NY Clear Channel Communications 1949 Feb-00 500 3.9 1.39 B WXBB FM Christian Syracuse, NY 78 DeRuyter NY Clear Channel Communications 1948 Apr-00 0 0 0 B WRCU FM Variety Syracuse, NY 78 Hamilton NY Colgate University 1970 0 0 0 A WDCW AM Christian Syracuse, NY 78 Syracuse NY Crawford Broadcasting Company 1922 Jul-93 0 0.5 0 B WOLF AM Children Syracuse, NY 78 Syracuse NY Fox, Craig 1940 Oct-82 100 0 0 C WVOA FM Christian Syracuse, NY 78 Mexico NY Fox, Craig 1996 Jul-96 250 0 0 A WSIV AM Christian Syracuse, NY 78 E. Syracuse NY Fox, Craig 1955 Sep-96 100 0 0 B WOLF FM Children Syracuse, NY 78 Oswego NY Fox,
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Orders/1996/fcc96335.htm http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Orders/1996/fcc96335.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Orders/1996/fcc96335.txt http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Orders/1996/fcc96335.wp
    • than do our current regulations and focused on regularly scheduled shows, which were classified "as educational/informational only if their primary intent was to educate, not entertainment shows that contained a social theme." SFPPTA NOI Comments, Attachment ("A Children's Television Act of 1990 Monitoring Report of South Florida Commercial Television Stations") at 5. SFPPTA concluded that the monitored stations were providing 0.5 to 1.5 hours per week of educational and informational programming for children. SFPPTA's second monitoring study of the same stations, conducted in February 1995 in the same manner as the first study, concludes that the stations provided between 1.5 and 2.0 hours per week of children's educational and informational programming. SFPPTA Comments, Attachment ("A Report on Miami Television Stations' Compliance
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Orders/1998/fcc98281.pdf
    • and available for use when the main antenna is out of service for repairs or replacement. An auxiliary antenna may be located at the same transmitter site as the station's main antenna or at a separate site. The service contour of the auxiliary antenna may not extend beyond the following corresponding contour for the main facility: (1) AM stations: The 0.5 mV/m field strength contours. (2) FM stations: The 1.0 mV/m field strength contours. (3) TV stations: The Grade B coverage contours. An application for an auxiliary antenna for an AM station filed pursuant to paragraphs (b) or (c) of this section must contain a map showing the 0.5 mV/m field strength contours of both the main and auxiliary facilities. *
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Orders/1998/fcc98315.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Orders/1998/fcc98315.txt http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Orders/1998/fcc98315.wp
    • 3.3 305.0 22274 17 22184 17 0.0 0.0 100.0 AK NORTH POLE 4 20 213.8 485.0 30801 79 30801 79 0.0 0.0 100.0 AK SITKA 13 2 1.0 33.0 6622 9 1132 8 0.0 0.0 100.0 AL ANNISTON 40 58 264.5 350.0 20802 1137 17127 616 0.2 0.0 98.0 AL BESSEMER 17 18 186.0 675.0 32102 1304 28690 1131 2.5 0.5 99.7 AL BIRMINGHAM 6 50 1000.0 420.0 35806 1598 34251 1547 0.0 0.0 96.5 AL BIRMINGHAM 10 53 1000.0 404.0 31917 1522 28399 1428 2.0 2.2 99.5 AL BIRMINGHAM 13 52 1000.0 408.0 32879 1564 29111 1465 0.0 0.0 99.5 AL BIRMINGHAM 42 30 166.3 421.0 26176 1333 23781 1253 0.4 0.4 100.0 AL BIRMINGHAM 68 36 50.0 314.0 14489
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Orders/2000/da002064.doc
    • principal community coverage requirements of Section 73.315(a) of the Commission's Rules with a site restriction of 7.5 kilometers (4.7 miles) south of the community. Channel 296A can be allotted at Cloverdale consistent with the minimum distance separation requirements of Section 73.207(b) and the principal community coverage requirements of Section 73.315(a) of the Commission's Rules at Point's requested site 0.8 kilometers (0.5 miles) south of the community. Accordingly, pursuant to the authority contained in Sections 4(i), 5(c)(1), 303(g) and (r) and 307(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, and Sections 0.61. 0.204(b) and 0.283 of the Commission's Rules, IT IS ORDERED, That effective October 30, 2000, the FM Table of Allotments, Section 73.202(b) of the Commission's Rules, IS AMENDED, with
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Orders/2000/fc00019a.doc
    • FM stations; or if it would result in new or increased overlap with an LP100 station, as set forth below: (1) * * * (2) * * * (3) * * * (4) LP100 stations (Protected Contour: 1 mV/m) Frequency separation Interference contour of proposed translator station Protected contour of LP100 LPFM station Cochannel 200 kHz 0.1 mV/m (40 dBu) 0.5 mV/m (54 dBu) 1 mV/m (60 dBu) 1 mV/m (60 dBu) * * * * * (continued....) Federal Communications Commission FCC 00-19 Federal Communications Commission FCC 00-19 ' ( ) 7 8 9 J L N Q S V V W X Y ¶ ¶ ¶ kd- ‰ ‰ ‰ j j j j j j j j j j
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Orders/2000/fcc00019.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Orders/2000/fcc00019.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Orders/2000/fcc00019.txt
    • receivers could potentially experience degradation from interference is small, generally 1 km or less from an LPFM antenna site. This interference analysis is shown in the following table: LPFM Potential Interference Radius Receiver Category Desired Signal Level -45 dBm -55 dBm -65 dBm Clock 0.3 km 0.7 km 2.1 km Portable 1.0 km 0.9 km 1.0 km Personal 0.4 km 0.5 km 0.5 km Further, we believe that this analysis provides a conservative estimate of actual interference potential of LPFM given NAB's performance criteria and the fact that NAB's sample included some of the poorer performing radios among the four studies. In addition, as pointed out by Rappaport and others, whether interference in fact occurs to FM listening is dependent on
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Orders/2000/fcc00115.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Orders/2000/fcc00115.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Orders/2000/fcc00115.txt
    • used for regular program service having power ratings appropriate for the authorized operating power(s). (b) There is no maximum power rating limit for FM, TV or Class A TV station transmitters, however, the maximum rated transmitter power of a main transmitter stalled at an AM station shall be as follows: ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Maximum rated Authorized power transmitter power (kW) ------------------------------------------------------------------------ 0.25, 0.5, or 1 kW......................................... 1 2.5 kW..................................................... 5 5 or 10 kW................................................. 10 25 or 50 kW................................................ 50 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ * * * * * 31. Section 73.1675 is amended by revising paragraphs (a)(1) and (c)(1) to read as follows: § 73.1675 Auxiliary antennas. (a)(1) An auxiliary antenna is one that is permanently installed and available for use when the main antenna
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Orders/2000/fcc00349.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Orders/2000/fcc00349.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Orders/2000/fcc00349.txt
    • FM stations; or if it would result in new or increased overlap with an LP100 station, as set forth below: (1) * * * (2) * * * (3) * * * (4) LP100 stations (Protected Contour: 1 mV/m) Frequency separation Interference contour of proposed translator station Protected contour of LP100 LPFM station Cochannel 200 kHz 0.1 mV/m (40 dBu) 0.5 mV/m (54 dBu) 1 mV/m (60 dBu) 1 mV/m (60 dBu) Note: For the purposes of determining overlap pursuant to this subsection, LPFM applications and permits that have not yet been licensed must be considered as operating with the maximum permitted facilities. All LPFM TIS stations must be protected on the basis of a nondirectional antenna. * * * *
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Orders/2000/fcc00368.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Orders/2000/fcc00368.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Orders/2000/fcc00368.txt
    • C...................................... 270 (168) 209 (130) 99 (61) Section 73.315 is amended by deleting the Note. Section 73.509 is amended by revising subsection (a) to read as follows: (a) * * * * * Contour of Contour of other Frequency separation proposed station station Co-channel......................0.1mV/m (40 dBu).. 1 mV/m (60 dBu). 1 mV/m (60 dBu)... 0.1 mV/m (40 dBu). 200 kHz......................... 0.5 mV/m (54 dBu).. 1 mV/m (60 dBu). 1 mV/m (60 dBu)... 0.5 mV/m (54 dBu). 400 kHz/600 kHz ........ 100 mV/m (100 dBu) 1 mV/m (60 dBu). 1 mV/m (60 dBu)... 100 mV/m (100 dBu). A new Section 73.515 is added as follows: § 73.515 NCE FM Transmitter Location The transmitter location shall be chosen so that, on the basis
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Orders/2001/fcc01060.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Orders/2001/fcc01060.txt
    • maintained to within ±3 deg. of the values specified on the instrument of authorization. Section 73.68 is amended by revising subsections (a)(2), (d)(2) and (d)(3) to read as follows: § 73.68 Sampling systems for antenna monitors. ***** (a)(2) Sampling lines for directional antennas may be of different lengths provided the phase difference of signals at the monitor are less than 0.5 degree between the shortest and longest cable lengths due to temperature variations to which the system is exposed. ***** (d)(2) Immediately prior to modification or replacement of components of the sampling system, and after a verification that all monitoring point values and operating parameters are within the limits or tolerances specified in the rules, the following indications must be recorded
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Public_Notices/MDS_Notices/mdaa0829.pdf
    • Lon. 82 39 5 W. 3.0 MILES NORTH OF INTERSTATE 40, ASHEVILLE, NC Antenna C/L RCAMSL 1041.10 meters BTA: 20 Asheville, NC File Number Applicant Channel(s) Station City & State BPMD-20000818AHV WIRELESS ONE OF NORTH CAROLINA, L.L.C. F1, F2, F3 JACKSONVILLE, NC Call Sign NEW (305346) Non-Common Carrier Status. Lat. 34 46 9 N. - Lon. 77 31 23 W. 0.5 MILES NORTHWEST OF ANTIOCH CHURCH, JACKSONVILLE, NC Antenna C/L RCAMSL 136.90 meters BTA: 214 Jacksonville, NC Page 1 of 3 Public Notice 8/30/00 file://\\K4\vol2\Shared\C3Shared\MDS_ITFS\NEW_MDS\PUBNOT\MDAA0829.HTM File Number Applicant Channel(s) Station City & State BPMD-20000816AAG WIRELESS ONE OF NORTH CAROLINA, L.L.C. E2, E3, E4 NEW BERN, NC Call Sign NEW (305349) Non-Common Carrier Status. Lat. 35 0 3 N. - Lon. 76
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Public_Notices/Radio_Cutoffs/pnmm9217.doc
    • of the Commission's Rules. -FCC- Attachment APPENDIX BPED -990104MA NEW Beverly Beach FL Good Idea, Inc. REQ: 91.100 MHz; Channel No. 216A H Erp: KW; H Haat: M V Erp: 1.3 KW; V Haat: 57 M BPED -990104MN NEW Beverly Beach FL Community Public Radio, Inc. REQ: 91.100 MHz; Channel No. 216A H Erp: KW; H Haat: M V Erp: 0.5 KW; V Haat: 80 M BPED -981231MB NEW Favoretta FL Day Star Public Radio, Inc. REQ: 91.100 MHz; Channel No. 216A H Erp: KW; H Haat: M V Erp: 1.3 KW; V Haat: 57 M BPED -990104MB NEW Favoretta FL Pathway Public Radio REQ: 91.100 MHz; Channel No. 216A H Erp: KW; H Haat: M V Erp: 1.3 KW; V
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Public_Notices/da982306.pdf
    • 1 Children's Educational Core Hours Reported by Network Owned Stations (3 Qtrs - October '97 - June '98) Note:"All stations" average from 4th Quarter '97 only; Owned and Operated station averages from 4th Quarter '97 and 1st and 2nd Quarters '98. Data from Form 398 filings. Some adjustments were made for tabulation purposes. Network Affiliation Core Hours per Week 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 4.0 4.5 ABC (10 stations) CBS (14 stations) NBC (13 stations) 3.1 3.0 4.4 Core Hours "All Stations" Network O&O Core Hours Chart 2 Nationwide Preemption Rate - All Stations (Fourth Quarter '97 - October-December '97) Note: All information from fourth quarter '97 Form 398 submissions. Network averages from all affiliates of each network.
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Miscellaneous/Orders/1997/fcc97050.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Miscellaneous/Orders/1997/fcc97050.txt http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Miscellaneous/Orders/1997/fcc97050.wp
    • in the WCS transmitters and the establishment of guardbands, on the order of 100 to 150 kHz, on the WCS spectrum immediately adjacent to the edges of the 2320-2345 MHz band. In addition, Primosphere requests that WCS transmissions be required 309 to be circularly polarized in the opposite sense to satellite DARS transmissions, that WCS mobile units be limited to 0.5 watts, and that fixed transmitters be limited to 100 watts. 310 130. In addition, AFTRCC -- the non-Government advisory committee for coordination of the flight test frequencies in the 2310-2390 MHz band -- states that the out-of-band emission limits proposed in the NPRM are insufficient to protect flight test operations in the 2320-2345 and 2360-2390 MHz bands from WCS operations.
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/OPP/working_papers/oppwp34.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/OPP/working_papers/oppwp34.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/OPP/working_papers/oppwp34.txt
    • cost of the facilities required to interconnect them. Under this ``Split the Incremental Cost of Interconnection'' rule, the O network, with only two subscribers, must pay for the same number of incremental links as the X network, even though X has twice as many subscribers. This means, of course, that the cost increase faced by O subscribers is greater (from 0.5 to 1.5 links per customer) than that faced by X subscribers (from 1.0 to 1.5 links per customer). This seems reasonable, because the O customers are gaining access to four additional parties, while the X subscribers are gaining access to only two more parties. Following this rule yields the same number of links per subscriber for each network. That is,
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/OPP/working_papers/oppwp35.pdf
    • The average buyer bargaining power is simply the average of these "averages." Figures 3 - 5 show the average buyer's bargaining power for the last four trading periods for each concentration treatment. 1 2 3 4 DBS UNCAP noMFN MFN 0.44 0.41 0.49 0.53 0.51 0.50 0.41 0.42 0.43 0.54 0.30 0.29 0.32 0.39 0.18 0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 Buyer Figure 3: Buyer Average Bargaining Power (Periods 5-8) Low/High Concentration Treatment Treatment 30 1 2 3 4 DBS UNCAP noMFN MFN 0.51 0.50 0.52 0.48 0.65 0.42 0.36 0.47 0.37 0.47 0.33 0.31 0.31 0.37 0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 Buyer Figure 4: Buyer Average Bargaining Power (Periods 5-8) High/High Concentration Treatment 1 2 3
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/OPP/working_papers/oppwp38chart.pdf
    • 1530-1535 5 MOBILE-SATELLITE (space-to-Earth), MARITIME MOBILE-SATELLITE (space-to-Earth), Mobile (aeronautical telemetry), S5.341, S5.351, US78, US315. 1535-1544 9 MOBILE-SATELLITE (space-to-Earth), MARITIME MOBILE-SATELLITE (space-to-Earth), S5.341, S5.351, US315. Satellite Communications (25), Maritime (80) 1544-1545 1 MOBILE-SATELLITE(space-to-Earth),S5.341,S5.356.SatelliteCommunications(25),Maritime(80) 1545-1549.5 4.5AERONAUTICAL MOBILE-SATELLITE (R) (space-to-Earth), Mobile-satellite (space-to-Earth), S5.341, S5.351, US308, US309. Aviation (87). 1549.5-1558.5 9 AERONAUTICAL MOBILE-SATELLITE (R) (space-to-Earth), MOBILE-SATELLITE (space-to-Earth), S5.341, S5.351, US308, US309. Aviation (87) 1558.5-1559 0.5 AERONAUTICALMOBILE-SATELLITE(R)(space-to-Earth),S5.341,S5.351,US308,US309.Aviation(87). 1559-1610 51 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION, RADIONAVIGATION-SATELLITE (space-to-Earth), S5.341, US208, US260. Aviation (87), Note: The NTIA Manual (footnote G126) states that differential GPS stations may be authorized in the 1559-1610 MHz band, but the FCC has not yet addressed this footnote. 1610-1610.6 0.6 MOBILE-SATELLITE(Earth-to-space),AERONAUTICALRADIONAVIGATION,RADIODETERMINATION-SATELLITE(Earth-to-space),US319,US260.SatelliteCommunications(25],Aviation(87). 1610.6-1613.8 3.2 MOBILE-SATELLITE (Earth-to-space), RADIO ASTRONOMY, AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION, RADIODETERMINATION-SATELLITE (Earth-to-space), US319, US260, S5.341, S5.364, S5.366, S5.367, S5.368,
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Comments/fcc98055/210097-1.pdf
    • design - 5 percent, prototype to manufacturing - 8 percent, and manufacturing startup - 1 percent. The tables below show the calculations from this model. 46 Program Type A B C D Average % MIX: 31.0 48.8 20.0 .2 100 * Months Months Months Months Months Function HC Min Max HC Min Max HC Min Max HC MinMaxHCMinMax Research 2 0.5 1 4 1 3 10 3 6 20 6 12 5 1.3 3 Specs/Design 3 1 2 6 3 8 20 10 18 100 18 24 8 3.88.17 Proto to Manuf 3 1 5 6 5 10 20 18 24 100 24 36 8 6.411.3 Manuf Startup 6 1 2 10 2 8 30 6 12 160 12 24 13
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Notices/1999/err99333.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Notices/1999/err99333.txt
    • the words ``operating in the 17,700-19,700.'' Section 101.111 is proposed to be revised by adding a new subsection 101.111(a)(5) which reads: For 24 GHz Service in the 24,250-25,250 MHz band: (i) On any frequency removed from the center frequency of the 24 GHz Service channel by more than 50 percent of that channel's bandwidth: A = 35 + 0.75(F - 0.5B) dB (in any 4 kHz channel), or A = 11 + 0.75(F - 0.5B) dB (in any 1 MHz channel), but in no event greater than 80 decibels; A = attenuation (in decibels) below mean output power level contained within the 24 GHz Service channel for a given polarization B = bandwidth of 24 GHz Service channel (in MHz) F
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Notices/1999/fcc99333.doc
    • amended by revising subsection 101.111(a)(4) to read as follows: § 101.111 Emission Limitations. (1) * * * (a) * * * (4) For DEMS channels in the 17,700-19,700 and 24,250-25,250 MHz bands: (i) On any frequency removed from the center frequency of the DEMS channel by more than 50 percent of that channel's bandwidth: A = 35 + 0.75(F - 0.5B) dB (in any 4 kHz channel), or A = 11 + 0.75(F - 0.5B) dB (in any 1 MHz channel), but in no event greater than 80 decibels; A = attenuation (in decibels) below mean output power level contained within the DEMS channel for a given polarization B = bandwidth of DEMS channel (in MHz) F = absolute value of
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Orders/1998/fcc98046.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Orders/1998/fcc98046.wp
    • 31, 1996); RFW Petition at 1, 4-5 (recommending a five-year deferral of principal and interest payments); Urban Communicators Petition at ii, 2, 5-7 (asking for an extension of the suspension until March 31, 1999, and two additional one-year deferrals, so long as licensees make certain demonstrations of financial ability and substantial construction progress and pay an interest rate increased by 0.5 percent for the deferral period); CONXUS Opposition at 6 (agreeing with NextWave and Alpine); Duluth PCS, et al. Opposition at 5 (advocating a five-year deferral of payment obligations); and Polycell Opposition at 5 (same as Duluth PCS, et al.). See also The Honorable Barbara Boxer ex parte filing at 1 (asking the Commission to consider a "limited deferral"); The Honorable
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Orders/1998/fcc98191.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Orders/1998/fcc98191.txt http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Orders/1998/fcc98191.wp
    • Motorola plan does not, in our estimation, provide enough spectrum for nationwide interoperability. The Florida plan (which does not appear to use the entire allocation) and NPSTC hold too little in reserve. 107 A detailed channelization plan is given in Appendix H. 24 Commenter's Suggested Spectrum & Channel Allocations Motorola NPSTC Florida INTEROPERABILITY Narrowband Wideband Total 80 x 6.25 = 0.5 -- 0.5 MHz 64 x 12.5 = 0.8 12 x 125 = 1.5 2.3 MHz 120 x 12.5 = 1.50 8 x 150 = 1.2 2.7 MHz GENERAL USE Narrowband Mid-size Wideband Total 1520 x 6.25 = 9.5 -- 60 x 100 = 6.0 15.5 MHz 800 x 12.5 = 10.0 -- 60 x 125 = 7.5 17.5 MHz 776
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Orders/1999/fcc99244.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Orders/1999/fcc99244.txt
    • assets to the trust. The applicant must not have any interest in or control of the trustee. The trust agreement must clearly state that there will be no communications with the trustee regarding the management or operation of the subject facilities, and must give the trustee authority to dispose of the license as the trustee sees fit. Consistent with section 0.5(c) of the Commisison's rules,264 we delegate authority to the Wireless Telecommunications Bureau to review proposed trusts to ensure that they comply with our rules. C. CTIA Forbearance Petition 1. Background 118. On September 30, 1998, the Cellular Telecommunications Industry Association filed a Petition for Forbearance (CTIA Forbearance Petition). CTIA requests that the Commission use its authority under section 10 of
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Public_Notices/1998/pnwl8065.pdf
    • W 0000000378 SCHUYLKILL MOBILE FONE, INC. NEPTUNE TOWNSHIPNJ RO KSV936 06/17/1998 00152.66000 40-13-29.4 N 074-03-18.4 W 0000000378 SCHUYLKILL MOBILE FONE, INC. NEPTUNE TOWNSHIPNJ RO KSV936 06/17/1998 00454.40000 40-13-29.4 N 074-03-18.4 W 0000000378 SCHUYLKILL MOBILE FONE, INC. NEPTUNE TOWNSHIPNJ RO KSV936 06/17/1998 00454.50000 40-13-29.4 N 074-03-18.4 W 0000000379 SCHUYLKILL MOBILE FONE, INC. PARSIPPANY TROY HILL NJ RO KSW20706/17/1998 00454.40000 40-50-44.3 N 074-31-00.5 W 0000000379 SCHUYLKILL MOBILE FONE, INC. PARSIPPANY TROY HILL NJ RO KSW20706/17/1998 00454.50000 40-50-44.3 N 074-31-00.5 W 0000000379 SCHUYLKILL MOBILE FONE, INC. PARSIPPANY TROY HILL NJ RO KSW20706/17/1998 00454.60000 40-50-44.3 N 074-31-00.5 W 0000000380 AIRTOUCH PAGING BLUFFDALE UT RO KNKL30506/17/1998 00931.98750 40-27-38.8 N 111-53-55.7 W 0000000380 AIRTOUCH PAGING COPPERTON UT RO KNKL30506/17/1998 00931.98750 40-34-21.8 N 112-08-17.7 W CD - Paging
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Public_Notices/1998/pnwl8075.pdf
    • 32-31-09.5 N 092-06-02.4 W 0000000711 NORTHEAST LOUISIANA TELEPHONE CO., INC. MONROE LA RO WQZ68806/28/1998 00152.84000 32-31-09.5 N 092-06-02.4 W 0000000711 NORTHEAST LOUISIANA TELEPHONE CO., INC. MONROE LA RO WQZ68806/28/1998 00152.84000 32-31-09.5 N 092-06-02.4 W 0000000711 NORTHEAST LOUISIANA TELEPHONE CO., INC. MONROE LA RO WQZ68806/28/1998 00152.84000 32-31-09.5 N 092-06-02.4 W 0000000711 NORTHEAST LOUISIANA TELEPHONE CO., INC. WINNSBORO LA RO WQZ68806/28/1998 00152.84000 32-10-00.5 N 091-44-03.4 W 0000000712 DUBOIS TELEPHONE EXCHANGE, INC.BAGGS WY RO KSW21106/28/1998 00152.66000 41-00-20.8 N 107-37-50.2 W 0000000713 PATTERSONVILLE TELEPHONE COMPANY ROTTERDAM JUNCTION NY RO KED351 06/28/1998 00152.81000 42-51-05.2 N 074-03-56.4 W 0000000714 PATTERSONVILLE TELEPHONE COMPANY CHARLESTON NY RO KTS207 06/28/1998 00152.84000 42-47-25.2 N 074-19-18.4 W 0000000714 PATTERSONVILLE TELEPHONE COMPANY DEFREESTVILLE NY RO KTS207 06/28/1998 00152.84000 42-39-37.2 N 074-41-10.5 W 0000000714
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Public_Notices/1998/pnwl8077.pdf
    • BRICKTOWN NJ RO KNKM81906/10/1998 00931.83750 40-02-27.4 N 074-07-23.5 W 0000000830 MOBILEMEDIA PAGING, INC. BRICKTOWN NJ RO KNKM81906/10/1998 00931.86250 40-02-27.4 N 074-07-23.5 W 0000000830 MOBILEMEDIA PAGING, INC. BRIDGETON NJ RO KNKM81906/10/1998 00931.83750 39-27-40.4 N 075-12-19.6 W 0000000830 MOBILEMEDIA PAGING, INC. BRIDGETON NJ RO KNKM81906/10/1998 00931.86250 39-27-40.4 N 075-12-19.6 W 0000000830 MOBILEMEDIA PAGING, INC. BUDD LAKE NJ RO KNKM81906/10/1998 00931.83750 40-53-04.3 N 074-46-00.5 W 0000000830 MOBILEMEDIA PAGING, INC. BUDD LAKE NJ RO KNKM81906/10/1998 00931.86250 40-53-04.3 N 074-46-00.5 W 0000000830 MOBILEMEDIA PAGING, INC. CHERRY HILL NJ RO KNKM81906/10/1998 00931.86250 39-54-45.4 N 074-58-30.6 W 0000000830 MOBILEMEDIA PAGING, INC. CHESTER NJ RO KNKM81906/10/1998 00931.51250 40-47-07.3 N 074-42-00.5 W 0000000830 MOBILEMEDIA PAGING, INC. CHESTER NJ RO KNKM81906/10/1998 00931.83750 40-47-07.3 N 074-42-00.5 W 0000000830 MOBILEMEDIA PAGING, INC. CHESTER
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Public_Notices/1998/pnwl8087.pdf
    • Frequency (MHz) Latitude Longitude Area Op. 0000001158 KERRVILLE TELEPHONE COMPANY KERRVILLE TX RM KFJ892 06/30/1998 00152.78000 30-08-50.7 N 099-09-36.1 W 0000001159 WHIDBEY TELEPHONE COMPANY MAPLE BEACH WA RM KNKM25606/30/1998 00152.03000 48-59-39.3 N 123-02-52.7 W 0000001159 WHIDBEY TELEPHONE COMPANY MAPLE BEACH WA RM KNKM25606/30/1998 00152.04500 48-59-39.3 N 123-02-52.7 W 0000001160 WHIDBEY TELEPHONE COMPANY LANGLEY WA RM KOP303 06/30/1998 00035.46000 48-00-27.3 N 122-27-00.5 W 0000001160 WHIDBEY TELEPHONE COMPANY LANGLEY WA RM KOP303 06/30/1998 00152.57000 48-00-27.3 N 122-27-00.5 W 0000001160 WHIDBEY TELEPHONE COMPANY LANGLEY WA RM KOP303 06/30/1998 00152.66000 48-00-27.3 N 122-27-00.5 W 0000001161 ALLCOM COMMUNICATIONS, INC. BENTONVILLE AR RM KNKB86706/30/1998 00152.84000 36-23-36.2 N 094-10-53.7 W 0000001161 ALLCOM COMMUNICATIONS, INC. BRANSON MO RM KNKB86706/30/1998 00152.84000 36-37-21.2 N 093-17-58.6 W 0000001161 ALLCOM COMMUNICATIONS, INC. EUREKA
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Public_Notices/1998/pnwl8152.pdf
    • 33-55-34.0 N CAMARILLO 34-l 3-l 3.0 N CORONA 33-51-00.0 N COSTA MESA 33-41-27.0 N EDOM HILLS 33-51-57.0 N GLENDALE 34-12-54.0 N HEMET 33-45-l 8.0 N INDIO 33-43-05.0 N INDIO 33-43-05.0 N LAKE ELSINORE 33-40-00.0 N NV 11 g-48-06.6 W NV 11 g-56-02.6 W CA 114-54-29.8 W CA 114-43-l 8.8 w CA 114-35-32.8 W AZ 114-12-38.8 W CA 114-24-59.8 W CA 120-31-00.5 W CA 117-57-29.2 w CA 116-52-43.0 W CA 119-02-I 9.3 w CA 117-39-08.1 W CA 117-53-03.2 W CA 116-25-58.0 W CA 118-16-32.2 W CA 116-56-43.0 W CA 116-12-57.0 W CA 116-12-57.0 W CA 117-19-14.1 w RO RO RO RO RO RQ ^n RO RO RO RO RO RO RO RO RO RO RO RO RO Page 3 CD - Paging
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Public_Notices/1999/da991591.pdf
    • will be the new high bid plus the dollar amount associated with the percentage increment (variable Ii+1 from above times the high bid). This result will be rounded to the nearest thousand if the minimum J - 2 acceptable bid is over ten thousand dollars or to the nearest hundred if it is under ten thousand dollars. Examples License 1 C=0.5, N = 0.1, M = 0.2 Round 1 (2 new bids, high bid = $1,000,000) 1. Calculation of percentage increment for round 2 using exponential smoothing: A1 = (0.5 * 2) + (0.5 * 0) = 1 The smaller of I2 = (1 + 1) * 0.1 = 0.2 or 0.2 (the maximum percentage increment) 2. Minimum bid increment for
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Public_Notices/1999/da992624.doc
    • most recent bidding round plus one minus the weighting factor times the activity index from the prior round. The activity index is then used to calculate a percentage increment by multiplying a minimum percentage increment by one plus the activity index with that result being subject to a maximum percentage increment. The Commission will initially set the weighting factor at 0.5, the minimum percentage increment at 0.1, and the maximum percentage increment at 0.2. Equations Ai = (C * Bi) + ( (1-C) * Ai-1) Ii+1 = smaller of ( (1 + Ai) * N) and M where, Ai = activity index for the current round (round i) C = activity weight factor Bi = number of bids in the current
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Public_Notices/1999/pnwl9060.pdf
    • 30-43-20.6 N 088-09-03.0 W 0000005496 AMERICAN MOBILEPHONE PAGING, INC. MOBILE AL RO KIF658 03/02/1999 00454.10000 30-43-20.6 N 088-09-03.0 W 0000005496 AMERICAN MOBILEPHONE PAGING, INC. MOBILE AL RO KIF658 03/02/1999 00454.17500 30-43-20.6 N 088-09-03.0 W 0000005496 AMERICAN MOBILEPHONE PAGING, INC. MOBILE AL RO KIF658 03/02/1999 00454.30000 30-43-34.6 N 088-09-06.0 W 0000005496 AMERICAN MOBILEPHONE PAGING, INC. MONROEVILLE AL RO KIF658 03/02/1999 00454.30000 31-32-00.5 N 087-24-31.9 W 0000005496 AMERICAN MOBILEPHONE PAGING, INC. OCEAN SPRINGS MS RO KIF658 03/02/1999 00454.30000 30-29-28.7 N 088-49-54.1 W 0000005496 AMERICAN MOBILEPHONE PAGING, INC. ORANGE BEACH AL RO KIF658 03/02/1999 00454.30000 30-16-50.7 N 087-33-59.9 W 0000005496 AMERICAN MOBILEPHONE PAGING, INC. PANAMA CITY FL RO KIF658 03/02/1999 00454.55000 30-10-48.7 N 085-38-11.7 W 0000005496 AMERICAN MOBILEPHONE PAGING, INC. PASCAGOULA MS RO KIF658
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Public_Notices/1999/pnwl9066.pdf
    • Inc. SPRINGFIELD MO RM KFL946 02/19/1999 00454.05000 37-12-22.1 N 093-17-12.6 W 0000005027 Radio Communications Specialists, Inc. SPRINGFIELD MO RM KFL946 02/19/1999 00454.05000 37-12-36.1 N 093-16-10.6 W 0000005061 AFTON COMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION BLUEFIELD WV RM KNKJ63102/22/1999 00158.10000 37-15-20.4 N 081-10-49.3 W 0000005066 KPL CORPORATION REYNOLDS GA RM KNKB26302/22/1999 00152.15000 32-29-04.5 N 084-07-29.6 W 0000005067 KPL CORPORATION Americus GA RM KUC899 02/22/1999 00152.18000 32-03-00.5 N 084-13-23.6 W 0000005067 KPL CORPORATION Americus GA RM KUC899 02/22/1999 00459.25000 32-03-00.5 N 084-13-23.6 W 0000005070 Richard A. Sullivan CORDELE GA RM KKB658 02/22/1999 00454.20000 31-55-45.6 N 083-46-19.6 W 0000005070 Richard A. Sullivan Hawkinsville GA RM KKB658 02/22/1999 00152.09000 32-14-00.5 N 083-30-32.6 W 0000005070 Richard A. Sullivan Hawkinsville GA RM KKB658 02/22/1999 00459.20000 32-14-00.5 N 083-30-32.6 W 0000005071 KPL
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Public_Notices/1999/pnwl9078.pdf
    • INC. NEWPORT NC RM KWU43503/29/1999 00158.70000 34-47-58.5 N 076-52-32.7 W 0000010307 ANSER-QUIK ENTERPRISES, INC. SEA LEVEL NC RM KWU43503/29/1999 00158.70000 34-52-48.5 N 076-22-12.7 W 0000010307 ANSER-QUIK ENTERPRISES, INC. STACY NC RM KWU43503/29/1999 00152.24000 34-53-01.5 N 076-30-19.7 W 0000010307 ANSER-QUIK ENTERPRISES, INC. STACY NC RM KWU43503/29/1999 00158.70000 34-53-01.5 N 076-30-19.7 W 0000010308 ANSER-QUIK ENTERPRISES, INC. EMERALD ISLE NC RM KNKI38403/29/1999 00152.12000 34-40-00.5 N 077-01-33.8 W 0000010309 ANSER-QUICK OF KINSTON, INC. KINSTON NC RM KIY725 03/29/1999 00152.03000 35-14-30.5 N 077-36-28.8 W 0000010309 ANSER-QUICK OF KINSTON, INC. KINSTON NC RM KIY725 03/29/1999 00152.12000 35-14-30.5 N 077-36-28.8 W 0000010309 ANSER-QUICK OF KINSTON, INC. KINSTON NC RM KIY725 03/29/1999 00152.15000 35-14-30.5 N 077-36-28.8 W 0000010309 ANSER-QUICK OF KINSTON, INC. KINSTON NC RM KIY725 03/29/1999 00152.21000 35-14-30.5
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Public_Notices/1999/pnwl9081.pdf
    • City State Purpose Call Sign Receipt Date Frequency (MHz) Latitude Longitude Area Op. 0000008065 Moraine Radio WEST BEND WI RM WRV94903/19/1999 00075.46000 43-26-39.9 N 088-10-43.3 W 0000008066 U-PAGE, INC. BINGHAMTON NY RM KNKI69303/19/1999 00152.57000 42-03-33.2 N 075-56-47.7 W 0000008066 U-PAGE, INC. COOPERSTOWN NY RM KNKI69303/19/1999 00152.57000 42-42-03.2 N 074-55-43.5 W 0000008066 U-PAGE, INC. DELHI NY RM KNKI69303/19/1999 00152.57000 42-17-17.3 N 074-53-00.5 W 0000008066 U-PAGE, INC. EDMESTON NY RM KNKI69303/19/1999 00152.57000 42-45-27.2 N 075-12-18.5 W 0000008066 U-PAGE, INC. EDMESTON NY RM KNKI69303/19/1999 00152.57000 42-45-27.2 N 075-12-18.5 W 0000008066 U-PAGE, INC. HANCOCK NY RM KNKI69303/19/1999 00152.57000 41-58-30.3 N 075-16-58.6 W 0000008066 U-PAGE, INC. N. FRANKLIN NY RM KNKI69303/19/1999 00072.88000 42-25-11.2 N 075-00-38.5 W 0000008066 U-PAGE, INC. N. FRANKLIN NY RM KNKI69303/19/1999 00152.57000 42-25-11.2
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Public_Notices/1999/pnwl9132.pdf
    • and Radiotelephone File Number Applicant Name City State Purpose Call Sign Receipt Date Frequency (MHz) Latitude Longitude Area Op. 0000014588 PAN AM WIRELESS INC BAYAMON PR RO KNKO32103/29/1999 00152.06000 18-17-33.8 N 066-09-53.6 W 0000014588 PAN AM WIRELESS INC BO CERCADILLO PR RO KNKO32103/29/1999 00152.06000 18-04-20.8 N 066-12-09.6 W 0000014588 PAN AM WIRELESS INC CAGUAS PR RO KNKO32103/29/1999 00152.06000 18-16-08.8 N 066-04-00.5 W 0000014588 PAN AM WIRELESS INC CAGUAS PR RO KNKO32103/29/1999 00152.18000 18-16-08.8 N 066-04-00.5 W 0000014588 PAN AM WIRELESS INC CAYEY PR RO KNKO32103/29/1999 00152.06000 18-09-07.8 N 066-04-48.5 W 0000014588 PAN AM WIRELESS INC EL YUNQUE PEAK PR RO KNKO32103/29/1999 00152.06000 18-18-37.8 N 065-47-26.5 W 0000014588 PAN AM WIRELESS INC EL YUNQUE PEAK PR RO KNKO32103/29/1999 00152.06000 18-18-37.8 N 065-47-26.5
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Public_Notices/1999/pnwl9158.pdf
    • Page 7 CD - Paging and Radiotelephone File Number Applicant Name City State Purpose Call Sign Receipt Date Frequency (MHz) Latitude Longitude Area Op. 0000015975 SKYTEL CORP. ASHEVILLE NC RM KNKG85903/29/1999 00931.93750 35-36-04.3 N 082-39-05.4 W 0000015975 SKYTEL CORP. AUBURN HILLS MI RM KNKG85903/29/1999 00931.93750 42-42-05.1 N 083-15-10.7 W 0000015975 SKYTEL CORP. BASKING RIDGE NJ RM KNKG85903/29/1999 00931.93750 40-43-34.3 N 074-32-00.5 W 0000015975 SKYTEL CORP. BELLINGHAM WA RM KNKG85903/29/1999 00931.93750 48-48-03.3 N 122-27-44.6 W 0000015975 SKYTEL CORP. BILOXI MS RM KNKG85903/29/1999 00931.93750 30-25-55.7 N 088-57-23.1 W 0000015975 SKYTEL CORP. BISMARCK ND RM KNKG85903/29/1999 00931.93750 46-49-37.9 N 100-46-29.4 W 0000015975 SKYTEL CORP. BLOOMINGTON IL RM KNKG85903/29/1999 00931.93750 40-25-05.1 N 088-54-21.2 W 0000015975 SKYTEL CORP. BLOOMINGTON IN RM KNKG85903/29/1999 00931.93750 39-10-34.1 N 086-27-55.9
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Public_Notices/1999/pnwl9161.pdf
    • 00931.48750 33-59-16.4 N 094-17-43.7 W Page 11 CD - Paging and Radiotelephone File Number Applicant Name City State Purpose Call Sign Receipt Date Frequency (MHz) Latitude Longitude Area Op. 0000016475 SNIDER COMMUNICATIONS CORPORATIONS DBA: SNIDER TELECOM EL DORADO AR RM KNKG83706/10/1999 00931.48750 33-16-19.4 N 092-42-12.5 W 0000016475 SNIDER COMMUNICATIONS CORPORATIONS DBA: SNIDER TELECOM FARINDALE AR RM KNKG83706/10/1999 00931.48750 34-03-10.3 N 092-25-00.5 W 0000016475 SNIDER COMMUNICATIONS CORPORATIONS DBA: SNIDER TELECOM FAYETTEVILLE AR RM KNKG83706/10/1999 00931.48750 36-03-55.2 N 094-12-24.7 W 0000016475 SNIDER COMMUNICATIONS CORPORATIONS DBA: SNIDER TELECOM FORREST CITY AR RM KNKG83706/10/1999 00931.48750 35-06-44.3 N 090-42-58.3 W 0000016475 SNIDER COMMUNICATIONS CORPORATIONS DBA: SNIDER TELECOM GENOA AR RM KNKG83706/10/1999 00931.48750 33-23-04.4 N 093-53-24.6 W 0000016475 SNIDER COMMUNICATIONS CORPORATIONS DBA: SNIDER TELECOM HAMBURG AR RM
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Public_Notices/1999/pnwl9244.pdf
    • ELECTRONIC TELECOMMUNICATIONS VERNAL UT RO KNKN23609/21/1999 40-03-06.0 N 110-00-25.0 W 0000026959 UINTAH BASIN ELECTRONIC TELECOMMUNICATIONS VERNAL UT RO KNKN23609/21/1999 40-10-12.9 N 109-27-31.5 W 0000026959 UINTAH BASIN ELECTRONIC TELECOMMUNICATIONS VERNAL UT RO KNKN23609/21/1999 40-26-30.9 N 109-36-35.5 W 0000026959 UINTAH BASIN ELECTRONIC TELECOMMUNICATIONS VERNAL UT RO KNKN23609/21/1999 40-27-22.0 N 109-32-12.0 W 0000026959 UINTAH BASIN ELECTRONIC TELECOMMUNICATIONS VERNAL UT RO KNKN23609/21/1999 40-40-20.9 N 109-23-00.5 W 0000026959 UINTAH BASIN ELECTRONIC TELECOMMUNICATIONS VERNAL UT RO KNKN23609/21/1999 40-43-31.9 N 109-20-54.5 W 0000027003 SOUTHWESTERN BELL WIRELESS, INC.ATCHISON KS RO KNKQ31509/21/1999 39-32-34.0 N 095-08-22.9 W 0000027003 SOUTHWESTERN BELL WIRELESS, INC.BASEHOR KS RO KNKQ31509/21/1999 39-09-04.0 N 094-54-11.9 W 0000027003 SOUTHWESTERN BELL WIRELESS, INC.JARBALO KS RO KNKQ31509/21/1999 39-10-19.0 N 095-04-53.9 W Page 33 CL - Cellular File Number Applicant Name City
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Public_Notices/1999/pnwl9250.pdf
    • MO RM KNKO661 092-06-46.5 W 0000010543 CYBERTEL ST. LOUIS PAGING CORPORATION ST. ROBERT 03/29/1999 00931.33750 37-49-35.1 N Page 13 CD - Paging and Radiotelephone State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City MO RM KNKO661 091-26-40.5 W 0000010543 CYBERTEL ST. LOUIS PAGING CORPORATION STEELVILLE 03/29/1999 00931.33750 37-55-20.1 N MO RM KNKO661 090-58-00.5 W 0000010543 CYBERTEL ST. LOUIS PAGING CORPORATION TROY 03/29/1999 00931.33750 38-57-04.1 N IL RM KNKO661 090-16-30.4 W 0000010543 CYBERTEL ST. LOUIS PAGING CORPORATION VALMEYER 03/29/1999 00931.33750 38-18-18.1 N MO RM KNKO661 091-56-21.5 W 0000010543 CYBERTEL ST. LOUIS PAGING CORPORATION VIENNA 03/29/1999 00931.33750 38-08-36.1 N MO RM KNKO661 093-37-58.7 W 0000010543 CYBERTEL ST. LOUIS PAGING CORPORATION WARRENSBURG 03/29/1999 00931.33750 38-43-25.0 N
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Public_Notices/1999/pnwl9261.pdf
    • w WA 11 g-50-39.2 w WA 11 g-50-39.2 w WA 11 g-50-39.2 w WA 11 g-50-39.2 w WA 11 g-50-39.2 w WA 11 g-50-39.2 w WA 11 g-50-39.2 w WA 11 g-50-39.2 w WA 119-26-21.1 W WA 119-26-21.1 W WA 119-26-21.1 W WA 119-26-21.1 W WA 119-26-21.1 W Purpose Area Op. AM AM WLT833 AM WLT833 39-26-l 9.0 N BREWSTER 48-09-00.5 N BREWSTER 48-09-00.5 N BREWSTER 48-09-00.5 N BREWSTER 48-09-00.5 N BREWSTER 48-09-00.5 N BREWSTER 48-09-00.5 N BREWSTER 48-09-00.5 N BREWSTER 48-09-00.5 N BREWSTER 48-09-00.5 N BREWSTER 48-09-00.5 N COULEE CITY 47-35-57.5 N COULEE CITY 47-35-57.5 N COULEE CITY 47-35-57.5 N COULEE CITY 47-35-57.5 N COULEE CITY 47-35-57.5 N AM WLT833 06063.80000 U S WEST COMMUNICATIONS INC 05974.85000 MD KPT53 MD
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Public_Notices/1999/pnwl9274.pdf
    • INC. LAUGHLIN 06/21/1999 00454.07500 35-14-57.9 N NV RM WQZ607 115-00-22.9 W 0000035317 FLEET CALL WEST, INC. DBA: NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS, INC. NEAR HENDERSON 06/21/1999 00454.07500 36-00-29.9 N NV RM WQZ607 115-00-22.9 W 0000035317 FLEET CALL WEST, INC. DBA: NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS, INC. NEAR HENDERSON 06/21/1999 00454.20000 36-00-29.9 N FL RM KNKK662 081-29-29.3 W 0000036815 CARMELITA GOSSARD, dba AA BEEPCUDJOE KEY 10/08/1999 00152.75000 24-41-00.5 N FL RM KNKK662 081-02-03.2 W 0000036815 CARMELITA GOSSARD, dba AA BEEPMARATHON 10/08/1999 00152.75000 24-43-48.5 N FL RM KNKK662 081-44-49.3 W 0000036815 CARMELITA GOSSARD, dba AA BEEPSTOCK ISLAND 10/08/1999 00152.75000 24-34-21.5 N GA RM KUC960 084-52-05.7 W 0000036825 CAR TEL COMMUNICATIONS, INC NEWMAN 10/08/1999 00454.07500 33-22-24.4 N ID RM KNKJ579 117-00-25.5 W 0000036867 AUDIOCOM ELECTRONICS INC MOSCOW 10/01/1999 00075.74000 46-43-45.5
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Public_Notices/1999/pnwl9328.pdf
    • 084-33-55.4 W 0000062015 ATLANTA-ATHENS MSA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP Marietta 12/23/1999 06152.75000 33-58-57.2 N GA MD WLL373 084-33-55.4 W 0000062015 ATLANTA-ATHENS MSA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP Marietta 12/23/1999 10621.25000 33-58-57.2 N GA MD WLL373 084-33-55.4 W 0000062015 ATLANTA-ATHENS MSA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP Marietta 12/23/1999 10628.12500 33-58-57.2 N GA MD WLL373 084-33-55.4 W 0000062015 ATLANTA-ATHENS MSA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP Marietta 12/23/1999 10835.00000 33-58-57.2 N MA MD WHO996 071-13-00.5 W 0000062051 SOUTHWESTERN BELL MOBILE SYSTEMS INC ANDOVER 10/28/1999 06197.24000 42-39-14.0 N MA MD WHO996 071-13-00.5 W 0000062051 SOUTHWESTERN BELL MOBILE SYSTEMS INC ANDOVER 10/28/1999 06375.14000 42-39-14.0 N MA MD WHO996 071-13-00.5 W 0000062051 SOUTHWESTERN BELL MOBILE SYSTEMS INC ANDOVER 10/28/1999 10667.50000 42-39-14.0 N MA MD WHO996 071-13-00.5 W 0000062051 SOUTHWESTERN BELL MOBILE SYSTEMS INC ANDOVER 10/28/1999 11627.50000 42-39-14.0 N
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Public_Notices/2000/d002836c.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Public_Notices/2000/d002836c.txt
    • 518) * ($1,500/2.59) Where: $300,000 is the amount toward the first 518 square kilometers; (Total square kilometers -518) is the number of square kilometers exceeding 518; and $1,500/2.59 is the amount toward the credit for each square kilometer exceeding 518. If high bid is... Then Net Credit after application of cap is... <= $1,000,000 Not to exceed High Bid * (0.5) > $1,000,000 and <= $2,000,000 Not to exceed $500,000 > $2,000,000 Not to exceed High Bid * (0.25) Example #1. Suppose the winning bid in a future auction for EA 31 was $750,000. Upon filing its long form application the winning bidder elects to seek a credit with respect to the Big Cypress Reservation (214 square km in EA 31)
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Public_Notices/2000/da000043.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Public_Notices/2000/da000043.txt
    • most recent bidding round plus one minus the weighting factor times the activity index from the prior round. The activity index is then used to calculate a percentage increment by multiplying a minimum percentage increment by one plus the activity index with that result being subject to a maximum percentage increment. The Commission will initially set the weighting factor at 0.5, the minimum percentage increment at 0.1, and the maximum percentage increment at 0.2. Equations Ai = (C * Bi) + ( (1-C) * Ai-1) Ii+1 = smaller of ( (1 + Ai) * N) and M where, Ai = activity index for the current round (round i) C = activity weight factor Bi = number of bids in the current
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Public_Notices/2000/da000112.doc
    • most recent bidding round plus one minus the weighting factor times the activity index from the prior round. The activity index is then used to calculate a percentage increment by multiplying a minimum percentage increment by one plus the activity index with that result being subject to a maximum percentage increment. The Commission will initially set the weighting factor at 0.5, the minimum percentage increment at 0.1, and the maximum percentage increment at 0.2. (See example below.) Ai = (C * Bi) + ( (1-C) * Ai-1) Ii+1 = smaller of ( (1 + Ai) * N) and M where, Ai = activity index for the current round (round i) C = activity weight factor Bi = number of bids in
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Public_Notices/2000/da000292.doc
    • most recent bidding round plus one minus the weighting factor times the activity index from the prior round. The activity index is then used to calculate a percentage increment by multiplying a minimum percentage increment by one plus the activity index with that result being subject to a maximum percentage increment. The Commission will initially set the weighting factor at 0.5, the minimum percentage increment at 0.1, and the maximum percentage increment at 0.2. (See example below.) Ai = (C * Bi) + ( (1-C) * Ai-1) Ii+1 = smaller of ( (1 + Ai) * N) and M where, Ai = activity index for the current round (round i) C = activity weight factor Bi = number of bids in
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Public_Notices/2000/da000504.doc
    • most recent bidding round plus one minus the weighting factor times the activity index from the prior round. The activity index is then used to calculate a percentage increment by multiplying a minimum percentage increment by one plus the activity index with that result being subject to a maximum percentage increment. The Commission will initially set the weighting factor at 0.5, the minimum percentage increment at 0.1, and the maximum percentage increment at 0.2. Equations Ai = (C * Bi) + (1-C) * Ai-1) Ii+1 = smaller of ( (1 + Ai) * N) and M where, Ai = activity index for the current round (round i) C = activity weight factor Bi = number of bids in the current round
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Public_Notices/2000/da000559.doc
    • most recent bidding round plus one minus the weighting factor times the activity index from the prior round. The activity index is then used to calculate a percentage increment by multiplying a minimum percentage increment by one plus the activity index with that result being subject to a maximum percentage increment. The Commission will initially set the weighting factor at 0.5, the minimum percentage increment at 0.1, and the maximum percentage increment at 0.2. Equations Ai = (C * Bi) + ( (1-C) * Ai-1) Ii+1 = smaller of ( (1 + Ai) * N) and M where, Ai = activity index for the current round (round i) C = activity weight factor Bi = number of bids in the current
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Public_Notices/2000/da000667.doc
    • most recent bidding round plus one minus the weighting factor times the activity index from the prior round. The activity index is then used to calculate a percentage increment by multiplying a minimum percentage increment by one plus the activity index with that result being subject to a maximum percentage increment. The Commission will initially set the weighting factor at 0.5, the minimum percentage increment at 0.1, and the maximum percentage increment at 0.2. Equations Ai = (C * Bi) + ( (1-C) * Ai-1) Ii+1 = smaller of ( (1 + Ai) * N) and M where, Ai = activity index for the current round (round i) C = activity weight factor Bi = number of bids in the current
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Public_Notices/2000/da000668.doc
    • most recent bidding round plus one minus the weighting factor times the activity index from the prior round. The activity index is then used to calculate a percentage increment by multiplying a minimum percentage increment by one plus the activity index with that result being subject to a maximum percentage increment. The Commission will initially set the weighting factor at 0.5, the minimum percentage increment at 0.1, and the maximum percentage increment at 0.2. Equations Ai = (C * Bi) + ( (1-C) * Ai-1) Ii+1 = smaller of ( (1 + Ai) * N) and M where, Ai = activity index for the current round (round i) C = activity weight factor Bi = number of bids in the current
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Public_Notices/2000/da001100.doc
    • most recent bidding round plus one minus the weighting factor times the activity index from the prior round. The activity index is then used to calculate a percentage increment by multiplying a minimum percentage increment by one plus the activity index with that result being subject to a maximum percentage increment. The Commission will initially set the weighting factor at 0.5, the minimum percentage increment at 0.1, and the maximum percentage increment at 0.2. (See example below.) Ai = (C * Bi) + ( (1-C) * Ai-1) Ii+1 = smaller of ( (1 + Ai) * N) and M where, Ai = activity index for the current round (round i) C = activity weight factor Bi = number of bids in
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Public_Notices/2000/da001388.doc
    • most recent bidding round plus one minus the weighting factor times the activity index from the prior round. The activity index is then used to calculate a percentage increment by multiplying a minimum percentage increment by one plus the activity index with that result being subject to a maximum percentage increment. The Commission will initially set the weighting factor at 0.5, the minimum percentage increment at 0.1, and the maximum percentage increment at 0.2. (See example below.) Ai = (C * Bi) + ( (1-C) * Ai-1) Ii+1 = smaller of ( (1 + Ai) * N) and M where, Ai = activity index for the current round (round i) C = activity weight factor Bi = number of bids in
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Public_Notices/2000/da002038.doc
    • most recent bidding round plus one minus the weighting factor times the activity index from the prior round. The activity index is then used to calculate a percentage increment by multiplying a minimum percentage increment by one plus the activity index with that result being subject to a maximum percentage increment. The Commission will initially set the weighting factor at 0.5, the minimum percentage increment at 0.1 (10%), and the maximum percentage increment at 0.2 (20%). Equations Ai = (C * Bi) + (1-C) * Ai-1) Ii+1 = smaller of ( (1 + Ai) * N) and M where, Ai = activity index for the current round (round i) C = activity weight factor Bi = number of bids in the
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Public_Notices/2000/da002259.doc
    • most recent bidding round plus one minus the weighting factor times the activity index from the prior round. The activity index is then used to calculate a percentage increment by multiplying a minimum percentage increment by one plus the activity index with that result being subject to a maximum percentage increment. The Commission will initially set the weighting factor at 0.5, the minimum percentage increment at 0.1, and the maximum percentage increment at 0.2. (See example below.) Ai = (C * Bi) + ( (1-C) * Ai-1) Ii+1 = smaller of ( (1 + Ai) * N) and M where, Ai = activity index for the current round (round i) C = activity weight factor Bi = number of bids in
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Public_Notices/2000/pnwl0003.pdf
    • N NC NE 080-31-41.2 W 0000062773 Cellco Partnership MONROE 11/17/1999 06004.50000 35-08-27.5 N NC NE 080-31-41.2 W 0000062773 Cellco Partnership MONROE 11/17/1999 06034.15000 35-08-27.5 N NC NE 080-31-41.2 W 0000062773 Cellco Partnership MONROE 11/17/1999 06063.80000 35-08-27.5 N NC NE 080-31-41.2 W 0000062773 Cellco Partnership MONROE 11/17/1999 06093.45000 35-08-27.5 N NC NE 081-50-19.4 W 0000062779 Cellco Partnership UNION MILLS 11/17/1999 05945.20000 35-35-00.5 N NC NE 081-50-19.4 W 0000062779 Cellco Partnership UNION MILLS 11/17/1999 06004.50000 35-35-00.5 N NC NE 081-50-19.4 W 0000062779 Cellco Partnership UNION MILLS 11/17/1999 06063.80000 35-35-00.5 N NC NE 081-50-19.4 W 0000062779 Cellco Partnership UNION MILLS 11/17/1999 06226.89000 35-35-00.5 N Page 8 CF - Common Carrier Fixed Point to Point Microwave State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Public_Notices/2000/pnwl0034.pdf
    • Public Notice. Opposition to objections may be filed no later than 10 days after the original objection is filed. Responses to the opposition may be filed no later than 5 days after the time for filing an opposition has expired. A Apppplliiccaanntt FFiillee N Nuum mbbeerr C Coooorrddiinnaatteess D Daattee R Reecc''dd Unisite A0099667 25-54-10.6/80-19-43.2 10/04/99 SBA Towers, Inc. A0109382 36-10-0.5/82-44.2-23.711/26/99 Kansas City SMSA Limited A0112347 39-4-19.9/94-33-10.8 2/04/00 Partnership Cincinnati Bell Wireless,LLC A0111451 39-3-44.0/84-53-43.0 2/08/00 -FCC-
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Public_Notices/2000/pnwl0074.pdf
    • ttoow weerr w wiillll nnoott hhaavvee aannyy ssiiggnniiffiiccaanntt iim mppaacctt uuppoonn tthhee eennvviirroonnm meenntt.. SSeeee 4477 C C..FF.. R R.. §§ 11..11330088((dd)).. A Accccoorrddiinnggllyy,, tthhee aapppplliiccaattiioonn((ss)) lliisstteedd hheerreeiinn ffoorr m maajjoorr eennvviirroonnm meennttaall aaccttiioonnss aarree G GR RA AN NTTEED D.. A Apppplliiccaanntt FFiillee N Nuum mbbeerr C Coooorrddiinnaatteess D Daattee R Reecc''dd Unisite A0099667 25-54-10.6/80-19-43.2 10/04/99 SBA Towers A0109382 36-10-0.5/82-44-23.7 11/26/99 Cincinnati Bell Wireless,LLC A0111451 39-3-44/84-53-43.1 2/8/00 American Tower L.P. A0108309 41-35-50.3/83-28-33.9 12/15/99 SBA Towers A0111777 35-3-52.0/81-7-6.9 1/6/00 Bell South Mobility,Inc. A0112125 29-46-56.9/90-31-20.9 2/2/00 SBA Towers A0112215 33-0-53.6/79-28-42.8 1/14/00 Kansass City SMSA A0112347 39-4-19.9/94-33-10.8 2/4/00 -FCC-
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Public_Notices/2000/pnwl0085.pdf
    • W 0000100855 BACKLINK LLC Dallas 03/31/2000 22675.00000 32-54-51.5 N TX NE 096-52-45.0 W 0000100856 BACKLINK LLC Dallas 03/31/2000 22825.00000 32-54-38.0 N TX NE 096-52-34.0 W 0000100857 BACKLINK LLC Farmers Branch 03/31/2000 22525.00000 32-54-52.5 N TX NE 096-52-26.8 W 0000100858 BACKLINK LLC Dallas 03/31/2000 22975.00000 32-54-50.6 N TX NE 096-47-03.1 W 0000100859 BACKLINK LLC Dallas 03/31/2000 21625.00000 32-55-24.4 N TX NE 096-47-00.5 W 0000100860 BACKLINK LLC Dallas 03/31/2000 21525.00000 32-55-25.7 N TX NE 096-47-48.1 W 0000100861 BACKLINK LLC Dallas 03/31/2000 21775.00000 32-55-25.4 N TX NE 096-47-43.1 W 0000100862 BACKLINK LLC Dallas 03/31/2000 21225.00000 32-55-25.1 N TX NE 096-47-08.1 W 0000100863 BACKLINK LLC Dallas 03/31/2000 21325.00000 32-55-24.2 N TX NE 096-46-12.0 W 0000100864 BACKLINK LLC Dallas 03/31/2000 21425.00000 32-54-06.2 N TX NE 096-46-08.8
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Public_Notices/2000/pnwl0096.pdf
    • BORDER PIPELINE COMPANY DAVENPORT 04/12/2000 06123.10000 41-38-58.1 N IA MD WPOT936 090-26-58.4 W 0000103151 NORTHERN BORDER PIPELINE COMPANY DAVENPORT 04/12/2000 06152.75000 41-38-58.1 N OH MD WLR625 082-01-32.5 W 0000106336 GTE MOBILNET OF OHIO LIMITED PARTNERSHIP GRAFTON 04/11/2000 06615.00000 41-16-17.2 N OH MD WLR625 082-01-32.5 W 0000106336 GTE MOBILNET OF OHIO LIMITED PARTNERSHIP GRAFTON 04/11/2000 10755.00000 41-16-17.2 N OH MD WLB360 081-50-00.5 W 0000106368 GTE MOBILNET OF OHIO LIMITED PARTNERSHIP STRONGSVILLE 04/11/2000 02123.20000 41-16-34.2 N OH MD WLB360 081-50-00.5 W 0000106368 GTE MOBILNET OF OHIO LIMITED PARTNERSHIP STRONGSVILLE 04/11/2000 06775.00000 41-16-34.2 N OH MD WLB360 081-50-00.5 W 0000106368 GTE MOBILNET OF OHIO LIMITED PARTNERSHIP STRONGSVILLE 04/11/2000 10855.00000 41-16-34.2 N NC MD WMJ750 078-53-41.0 W 0000106372 AMERICAN TELEVISION AND COMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION DURHAM 03/06/2000
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Public_Notices/2000/pnwl0109.pdf
    • File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City AL AM 087-46-04.0 W 0000102182 Pine Belt Telephone Co Inc DEMOPOLIS 04/19/2000 06004.50000 32-26-33.0 N OH AM WLR625 082-01-32.5 W 0000106336 GTE MOBILNET OF OHIO LIMITED PARTNERSHIP GRAFTON 04/18/2000 06615.00000 41-16-17.2 N OH AM WLR625 082-01-32.5 W 0000106336 GTE MOBILNET OF OHIO LIMITED PARTNERSHIP GRAFTON 04/18/2000 10755.00000 41-16-17.2 N OH AM WLB360 081-50-00.5 W 0000106368 GTE MOBILNET OF OHIO LIMITED PARTNERSHIP STRONGSVILLE 04/18/2000 02123.20000 41-16-34.2 N OH AM WLB360 081-50-00.5 W 0000106368 GTE MOBILNET OF OHIO LIMITED PARTNERSHIP STRONGSVILLE 04/18/2000 06775.00000 41-16-34.2 N OH AM WLB360 081-50-00.5 W 0000106368 GTE MOBILNET OF OHIO LIMITED PARTNERSHIP STRONGSVILLE 04/18/2000 10855.00000 41-16-34.2 N TX AM WLM757 098-07-42.4 W 0000106498 SAN ANTONIO SMSA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP NEW BRAUNFELS
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Public_Notices/2000/pnwl0121.pdf
    • 05/05/2000 19425.00000 37-42-39.7 N PA NE 075-10-15.9 W 0000124632 Teligent License Company II, L.L.C. PHILADELPHIA 05/05/2000 19560.00000 39-57-11.2 N IL NE 087-53-56.7 W 0000124635 BACKLINK LLC DES PLAINES 05/05/2000 17840.00000 42-00-31.1 N IL NE 087-53-47.5 W 0000124636 BACKLINK LLC DES PLAINES 05/05/2000 18000.00000 42-00-33.6 N IL NE 087-50-16.9 W 0000124638 BACKLINK LLC PARK RIDGE 05/05/2000 17880.00000 41-59-13.2 N NJ NE 074-10-00.5 W 0000124640 BACKLINK LLC Newark 05/05/2000 21425.00000 40-44-05.6 N NJ NE 074-10-00.5 W 0000124640 BACKLINK LLC Newark 05/05/2000 21575.00000 40-44-05.6 N NJ NE 074-10-00.5 W 0000124640 BACKLINK LLC Newark 05/05/2000 21775.00000 40-44-05.6 N NJ NE 074-10-06.3 W 0000124641 BACKLINK LLC Newark 05/05/2000 22625.00000 40-44-06.1 N NJ NE 074-10-05.5 W 0000124642 BACKLINK LLC Newark 05/05/2000 22975.00000 40-44-08.1 N NJ NE 074-09-57.0
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Public_Notices/2000/pnwl0137.pdf
    • 37-46-37.0 N MN NE 092-07-24.0 W 0000129684 County of Saint Louis DULUTH 05/15/2000 00956.36875 46-47-08.0 N PR NE 066-02-37.6 W 0000129943 Banco Popular De Puerto Rico SAN JUAN 05/15/2000 18040.60000 18-24-42.8 N AZ NE 112-10-10.5 W 0000129947 PHOENIX, CITY OF PHOENIX 05/15/2000 10955.00000 33-26-55.2 N AZ NE 112-10-10.5 W 0000129947 PHOENIX, CITY OF PHOENIX 05/15/2000 10965.00000 33-26-55.2 N AZ NE 112-04-00.5 W 0000130040 PHOENIX, CITY OF PHOENIX 05/15/2000 11455.00000 33-19-57.2 N CA NE 117-32-02.0 W 0000131695 Corona, City of CORONA 05/16/2000 19275.00000 33-55-40.0 N OR NE 121-30-06.0 W 0000131802 CENTRAL OREGON COMMUNITY COLLEGE La Pine 05/16/2000 17810.00000 43-40-02.0 N OR NE 121-21-03.0 W 0000131810 CENTRAL OREGON COMMUNITY COLLEGE Sunriver 05/16/2000 19370.00000 43-49-44.0 N AZ NE 112-11-13.6 W 0000132560 PHOENIX, CITY OF
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Public_Notices/2000/pnwl0142.pdf
    • BACKLINK LLC New York 05/24/2000 21325.00000 40-43-22.4 N NY AM 074-00-22.0 W 0000097087 BACKLINK LLC New York 05/24/2000 19640.00000 40-43-17.8 N NY AM 074-00-22.0 W 0000097087 BACKLINK LLC New York 05/24/2000 21525.00000 40-43-17.8 N TX AM 096-47-03.1 W 0000100859 BACKLINK LLC Dallas 05/24/2000 17880.00000 32-55-24.4 N TX AM 096-47-03.1 W 0000100859 BACKLINK LLC Dallas 05/24/2000 21625.00000 32-55-24.4 N TX AM 096-47-00.5 W 0000100860 BACKLINK LLC Dallas 05/24/2000 17960.00000 32-55-25.7 N TX AM 096-47-00.5 W 0000100860 BACKLINK LLC Dallas 05/24/2000 21525.00000 32-55-25.7 N TX AM 096-47-48.1 W 0000100861 BACKLINK LLC Dallas 05/24/2000 17920.00000 32-55-25.4 N TX AM 096-47-48.1 W 0000100861 BACKLINK LLC Dallas 05/24/2000 21775.00000 32-55-25.4 N TX AM 096-47-43.1 W 0000100862 BACKLINK LLC Dallas 05/24/2000 18000.00000 32-55-25.1 N TX AM 096-47-43.1
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Public_Notices/2000/pnwl0200.pdf
    • ATLANTA 07/26/2000 18000.00000 33-45-20.8 N MO NE 090-25-46.9 W 0000194646 KATLINK LLC St. Louis 07/26/2000 17920.00000 38-42-09.4 N WA NE 122-20-01.1 W 0000194695 BACKLINK LLC Seattle 07/26/2000 19560.00000 47-35-59.9 N Page 20 CF - Common Carrier Fixed Point to Point Microwave State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City WA NE 122-20-00.5 W 0000194696 BACKLINK LLC Seattle 07/26/2000 19480.00000 47-35-58.3 N WA NE 122-20-01.6 W 0000194697 BACKLINK LLC Seattle 07/26/2000 19680.00000 47-36-08.8 N OR NE 122-54-37.3 W 0000194709 AT&T Wireless Services of Florida, Inc. Springfiled 07/26/2000 06826.87500 44-07-30.4 N OR NE 123-17-58.4 W 0000194728 AT&T Wireless Services of Florida, Inc. Dallas 07/26/2000 06785.62500 44-53-47.4 N PA NE 080-00-23.6 W 0000194747 KATLINK LLC
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Public_Notices/2000/pnwl0207.pdf
    • (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City MA NE 072-38-54.0 W 0000197333 Equal Access Networks LLC HOLYOKE 07/31/2000 11465.00000 42-14-28.0 N NJ NE 074-02-45.4 W 0000197356 BACKLINK LLC HACKENSACK 07/31/2000 18040.00000 40-52-46.2 N NJ NE 074-02-06.0 W 0000197357 BACKLINK LLC HACKENSACK 07/31/2000 17920.00000 40-53-55.3 N IL NE 087-40-36.0 W 0000197371 Teligent License Company II, L.L.C. CHICAGO 07/31/2000 19560.00000 41-54-37.0 N NJ NE 074-10-00.5 W 0000197376 Teligent License Company II, L.L.C. NEWARK 07/31/2000 21275.00000 40-44-05.6 N NJ NE 074-10-00.5 W 0000197376 Teligent License Company II, L.L.C. NEWARK 07/31/2000 21325.00000 40-44-05.6 N NJ NE 074-10-00.5 W 0000197376 Teligent License Company II, L.L.C. NEWARK 07/31/2000 21375.00000 40-44-05.6 N NJ NE 074-10-00.5 W 0000197376 Teligent License Company II, L.L.C. NEWARK 07/31/2000 21475.00000 40-44-05.6 N NJ NE 074-10-00.5
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Public_Notices/2000/pnwl0211.pdf
    • 083-15-54.6 W 0000204034 GEORGIA RSA #11, INC. VALDOSTA 08/11/2000 10618.12500 30-54-11.2 N GA MD WPOS354 083-15-54.6 W 0000204034 GEORGIA RSA #11, INC. VALDOSTA 08/11/2000 10627.50000 30-54-11.2 N MA MD WPOR712 071-52-59.2 W 0000204064 WORCESTER TELEPHONE COMPANYOXFORD 08/11/2000 10643.12500 42-10-27.3 N LA MD WPQL493 090-31-36.5 W 0000204087 Louisiana RSA #7 Cellular General Partnership Kentwood 08/11/2000 06650.00000 30-56-39.9 N MA MD WHO996 071-13-00.5 W 0000204097 SOUTHWESTERN BELL MOBILE SYSTEMS, INC. ANDOVER 08/11/2000 10658.12500 42-39-14.0 N TX MD WLW311 098-38-37.9 W 0000204098 TEXAS RSA 9B1 LIMITED PARTNERSHIP DBA RANGER 08/11/2000 02118.40000 32-27-36.4 N TX MD WLW311 098-38-37.9 W 0000204098 TEXAS RSA 9B1 LIMITED PARTNERSHIP DBA RANGER 08/11/2000 02128.00000 32-27-36.4 N CA MD KMH74 121-46-17.9 W 0000204101 CITIZENS TELECOMMUNICATIONS COMPANY OF CALIFORNIA INC BURNEY 08/11/2000
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Public_Notices/2000/pnwl0228.pdf
    • Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City OR RM KNKN411 123-11-16.4 W 0000213357 Verizon Wireless (VAW) LLC AMITY 09/01/2000 45-07-48.4 N OR RM KNKN411 123-11-16.4 W 0000213357 Verizon Wireless (VAW) LLC AMITY 09/01/2000 45-07-48.4 N OR RM KNKN411 123-11-16.4 W 0000213357 Verizon Wireless (VAW) LLC AMITY 09/01/2000 45-07-48.4 N OR RM KNKN411 123-49-00.5 W 0000213357 Verizon Wireless (VAW) LLC ASTORIA 09/01/2000 46-10-53.4 N OR RM KNKN411 123-12-50.4 W 0000213357 Verizon Wireless (VAW) LLC Carlton 09/01/2000 45-17-27.4 N OR RM KNKN411 123-53-50.5 W 0000213357 Verizon Wireless (VAW) LLC CHINOOK 09/01/2000 46-17-11.4 N OR RM KNKN411 123-12-39.4 W 0000213357 Verizon Wireless (VAW) LLC CLATSKANIE 09/01/2000 46-02-23.4 N OR RM KNKN411 123-10-50.4 W 0000213357 Verizon Wireless
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Public_Notices/2000/pnwl0239.pdf
    • 09/11/2000 36-57-23.8 N CA RM KNKN346 120-02-03.6 W 0000216757 CALIFORNIA RSA NO. 4 LIMITED PARTNERSHIP MADERA 09/11/2000 36-57-23.8 N Page 34 CL - Cellular State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City CA RM KNKN346 119-47-41.5 W 0000216757 CALIFORNIA RSA NO. 4 LIMITED PARTNERSHIP MADERA 09/11/2000 37-00-34.8 N CA RM KNKN346 119-45-00.5 W 0000216757 CALIFORNIA RSA NO. 4 LIMITED PARTNERSHIP MADERA 09/11/2000 37-05-33.8 N CA RM KNKN346 120-37-09.6 W 0000216757 CALIFORNIA RSA NO. 4 LIMITED PARTNERSHIP MENDOTA 09/11/2000 36-38-15.8 N CA RM KNKN346 120-28-55.7 W 0000216757 CALIFORNIA RSA NO. 4 LIMITED PARTNERSHIP Merced 09/11/2000 37-18-08.8 N CA RM KNKN346 120-24-24.7 W 0000216757 CALIFORNIA RSA NO. 4 LIMITED PARTNERSHIP MERCED 09/11/2000 37-15-15.8 N
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Public_Notices/2000/pnwl0252.pdf
    • LLC BOONE 09/26/2000 36-14-07.5 N TN RM KNKN631 081-57-40.4 W 0000225846 NC - 2 LLC BUNTONTOWN 09/26/2000 36-17-47.4 N NC RM KNKN631 082-17-48.5 W 0000225846 NC - 2 LLC BURNSVILLE 09/26/2000 35-56-17.4 N NC RM KNKN631 082-06-15.4 W 0000225846 NC - 2 LLC ESTATOE 09/26/2000 35-52-47.4 N NC RM KNKN631 081-25-35.3 W 0000225846 NC - 2 LLC GRANITE FALLS 09/26/2000 35-48-00.5 N NC RM KNKN631 081-33-04.4 W 0000225846 NC - 2 LLC Happy Valley 09/26/2000 35-58-31.5 N NC RM KNKN631 081-29-20.3 W 0000225846 NC - 2 LLC LENOIR 09/26/2000 35-54-25.5 N PA RM KNKN891 077-24-19.0 W 0000225865 GTE Wireless of the South IncorporatedCASTANEA 09/26/2000 41-07-14.0 N Page 38 CL - Cellular State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Reports/fcc00289.pdf
    • Aug. 5, 1999, at 6. 6 Inquiry Concerning The Deployment Of Advanced Telecommunications Capability To All Americans In A Reasonable And Timely Fashion, And Possible Steps To Accelerate Such Deployment Pursuant To Section 706 Of The Telecommunications Act Of 1996, Report, 14 FCC Rcd 2398, 2422. 7 Id. at 2406. Figure 1. Maximum Downstream Speeds Using WLL 155 25 10 0.5 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 Megabytes per Second Mobile Telephone Wireless Cable Upperbands Unlicensed Federal Communications Commission FCC 00-289 E-3 C. Service Providers 1. Cellular (800 MHz) / Broadband PCS (1900 MHz) In the United States, the current WLL in these bands is still in an early stage of development, is currently targeted at low-use/residential
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireline_Competition/Orders/2002/fcc02118.pdf
    • b,c,d,e MR-4-08-3550 % Out of Service > 24 Hours 25.77 NA 18.83 0 21.65 0 28.76 0 23.04 0 b,c,d,e MR-5 - Repeat Trouble Reports MR-5-01-3550 % Repeat Reports within 30 Days 15.94 NA 14.64 0 13.37 0 13.86 25 13.56 0 b,c,d,e Maintenance - POTS Platform MR-2 - Trouble Report Rate MR-2-02-3140 Network Trouble Report Rate ­ Platform 0.92 0.5 0.77 0.64 0.57 1.11 0.67 1.13 0.58 0.18 MR-2-03-3140 Network Trouble Report Rate ­ Central Office 0.14 0.17 0.06 0 0.04 0 0.05 0.19 0.06 0 MR-2-04-3140 % Subsequent Reports 11.59 20 10.31 0 11.71 0 22.22 0 a,b,c,e MR-2-05-3140 % CPE/TOK/FOK Trouble Report Rate 0.82 0.66 0.65 0.32 0.51 0.16 0.57 0.54 MR-3 - Missed Repair Appointments MR-3-01-3144 %
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Daily_Releases/Daily_Digest/2002/dd020910.html
    • Due: 11/01/2002. Reply Comments Due: 11/18/2002. Adopted: 09/04/2002 by NPRM. (DA No. 02-2201). MB [44]DA-02-2201A1.doc DIGITAL TELEVISION BROADCAST STATIONS (URBANA, ILLINOIS). Denied the Petition for Reconsideration filed by WGN Continental Broadcasting Company, and terminated proceeding. (Dkt No. 00-76, RM-9809). Action by: Chief, Video Division, Media Bureau. Adopted: 09/04/2002 by MO&O. (DA No. 02-2151). MB [45]DA-02-2151A1.doc [46]DA-02-2151A1.pdf [47]DA-02-2151A1.txt AMENDMENT OF SECTION 0.5 OF THE COMMISSION'S RULES RELATING TO COMPLIANCE WITH FEDERAL FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT REQUIREMENTS. Amended the rules.. Action by: The Commission. Adopted: 08/28/2002 by ORDER. (FCC No. 02-243). OMD [48]FCC-02-243A1.doc [49]FCC-02-243A1.pdf [50]FCC-02-243A1.txt PORT AUTHORITY OF NEW YORK AND NEW JERSEY. Granted waiver request for a period of one-year until September 11, 2003 to return World Trade Center Stations to operational status without
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Forms/Form301-CA/301ca.pdf
    • first column containing depression angle values and second (and subsequent, when applicable) column(s) containing relative field values. When applicable, the first row shall list the azimuth angle being tabulated. The range of depression angles shall be 10 degrees above horizontal (-10 degrees depression) to 90 degrees below horizontal (90 degrees depression) and shall include data points spaced not more than 0.5-degree between -5 and 10 degrees depression angle, and not more than 5 degrees elsewhere. All pattern minima and maxima shall be included. Additional elevation antenna (or radiation) pattern data may be included following the column corresponding to 350 degrees TN so that the direction(s) of maximum and minimum radiation are provided. A relative field value of 1 shall correspond to
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Forms/Form301/301.pdf
    • the day and night operation. Photographs taken in eight different directions from an elevated position on the 12 ground will be acceptable in lieu of the aerial photographs if the data referred to above can be clearly shown. Contour Maps - For daytime operation, applicants must submit a map or maps having appropriate scales, showing the 1000, 5, 2, and 0.5 (0.1 if Class A) mV/m daytime contours for both existing and proposed facilities. The map showing the 5 mV/m contour must clearly show the legal boundaries of the principal community to be served. For critical hours operation, applicants must submit a map or maps having appropriate scales, showing the 1000, 5, and 0.5 mV/m critical hours contours for both existing
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Forms/Form302-FM/302fmjune02.pdf
    • Item 3: Transmitter Power Output: The transmitter power output (TPO) must be specified in kilowatts, and rounded pursuant to Section 73.212. Item 4: Antenna Data: Applicant must provide the manufacturer, model number, number of sections and the spacing between antenna sections, in wavelengths. For example: Manufacturer: ERI ShivelyJamproDielectric Model Number: SHP-4AE6810 JHCP-3DCR-M4 Number of sections: 4 4 3 4 Spacing:1.0 0.5 1.0 1.0 F. Certifications. All applicants must complete questions 5 and 6, while only applicants filed to cover a construction permit must complete questions 7 and 8. Item 5: Main Studio Location. The applicant must certify that its main studio location complies with the requirements of Section 73.1125. In order to answer "Yes" to this question, the applicant's proposed main
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Forms/Form319/319Fill.pdf
    • to decimal form before calculating TPO. For example, 86% becomes 0.86. Transmission line efficiency is always less than one. Question 3: Antenna Data: Applicant must provide the manufacturer, model number, number of sections and the spacing between antenna sections, in wavelengths. For example: Manufacturer: ERI Shively Jampro Model Number: SHP-4AE 6810 JHCP-3 # of sections: 4 3 4 Spacing: 1.0 0.5 1.0 Question 4: Transmitter Power Output: The applicant must certify that the transmitter power output (TPO) produces the authorized effective radiated power. FCC NOTICE TO INDIVIDUALS REQUIRED BY THE PRIVACY ACT AND THE PAPERWORK REDUCTION ACT The FCC is authorized under the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, to collect the personal information we request in this form. We will
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Forms/Form340/340.pdf
    • first column containing depression angle values and second (and subsequent, when applicable) column(s) containing relative field values. When applicable, the first row shall list the azimuth angle being tabulated. The range of depression angles shall be 10 degrees above horizontal (-10 degrees depression) to 90 degrees below horizontal (90 degrees depression) and shall include data points spaced not more than 0.5-degree between -5 and 10 degrees depression angle, and not more than 5 degrees elsewhere. All pattern minima and maxima shall be included. Additional elevation antenna (or radiation) pattern data may be included following the column corresponding to 350 degrees TN so that the direction(s) of maximum and minimum radiation are provided. A relative field value of 1 shall correspond to
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Forms/Form345/345.pdf
    • the applicant to certify that the FM translator station will be used as a fill-in service. In the FM service, the coverage contour of the FM translator station must not extend beyond the protected coverage contour of the commercial FM primary station to be rebroadcast. For purposes of this question, the "protected coverage contour" is: Non-reserved band Class B Stations 0.5mV/m 54 dBu (50,50) contour Non-reserved band Class B1 Stations 0.7 mV/m 57 dBu (50,50) contour All other FM Station Classes 1 mV/m 60 dBu (50,50) contour In the AM service, the entire 60 dBu contour of the FM translator station must be contained within the lesser of : (a) the 2 mV/m daytime contour of the AM primary station being
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Forms/Form346/346.pdf
    • first column containing depression angle values and second (and subsequent, when applicable) column(s) containing relative field values. When applicable, the first row shall list the azimuth angle being tabulated. The range of depression angles shall be 10 degrees above horizontal (-10 degrees depression) to 90 degrees below horizontal (90 degrees depression) and shall include data points spaced not more than 0.5-degree between -5 and 10 degrees depression angle, and not more than 5 degrees elsewhere. All pattern minima and maxima shall be included. Additional elevation antenna (or radiation) pattern data may be included following the column corresponding to 350 degrees TN so that the direction(s) of maximum and minimum radiation are provided. A relative field value of 1 shall correspond to
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Forms/Form349/349.pdf
    • applicant to certify that the FM translator station will be used as a fill-in service. In the FM service, the coverage contour of the FM translator station must not extend beyond the protected coverage contour of the commercial FM primary station to be rebroadcast. For purposes of this question, the "protected coverage contour" is: 5 Non-reserved band Class B Stations 0.5mV/m 54 dBu (50,50) contour Non-reserved band Class B1 Stations 0.7 mV/m 57 dBu (50,50) contour All other FM Station Classes 1 mV/m 60 dBu (50,50) contour In the AM service, the entire 60 dBu contour of the FM translator station must be contained within the lesser of : (a) the 2 mV/m daytime contour of the AM primary station being
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Speeches/Chong/separate_statements/rbcuvser.html http://www.fcc.gov/Speeches/Chong/separate_statements/rbcuvser.txt
    • LEC potential productivity gains than our interim price cap plan, which offered three X-factors, some with sharing obligations. In the unlikely event we have made the X-factor too challenging for some LECs, we retain our low end adjustment mechanism. I think this is a wise safety net. To ensure that consumers share in LEC efficiency increases, we have added a 0.5 Consumer Productivity Dividend (CPD) to the X-factor. I recognize that some have argued that the CPD was initially adopted as a way to flow through the first benefits of the price cap plan to access charge customers, and that it may be time to bid the CPD a fond adieu. Given the current state of competition in most price cap
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Speeches/Furchtgott_Roth/Statements/sthfr925.html http://www.fcc.gov/Speeches/Furchtgott_Roth/Statements/sthfr925.txt http://www.fcc.gov/Speeches/Furchtgott_Roth/Statements/sthfr925.wp
    • contain terms that would have "significant consequences for the telecommunications industry" if more generally applied. Surely these are "new or novel" issues of law and policy that must be decided by the Commission. Indeed, the Commission's rules limit the general grants of delegated authority to the bureaus to "matters which are minor or routine or settled in nature." 47 CFR 0.5(c). By definition issues that are "unique" and "significant" cannot at the same time be "routine" and "minor." Indeed, in our WTO Implementation Order, the Commission expressly stated that it would consider any legitimate concerns regarding national security and law enforcement issues in the context of a particular request for authorization.[5]^(3) The Commission has not clarified its concerns or policies in
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Speeches/Tristani/Statements/stgt916.html http://www.fcc.gov/Speeches/Tristani/Statements/stgt916.txt http://www.fcc.gov/Speeches/Tristani/Statements/stgt916.wp
    • substantial portion of the American public, and because the merger implicates foreign ownership and national security under our nascent WTO Implementation Order, this merger warranted the attention of the full Commission, as opposed to its staff. Certainly, pursuant to Section 5(c)(1) of the Communications Act, we may delegate many of our functions to our professional staff, including merger review. Section 0.5(c) of our Rules, interpreting that grant of statutory authority, holds that "the Commission has delegated authority to its staff to act on matters which are minor or routine or settled in nature and those in which immediate action is necessary."[3]^(1) (emphasis added) Neither the size of this merger nor the issues it raises, should be deemed "minor or routine." Today,
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Speeches/misc/statements/bafranca.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Speeches/misc/statements/bafranca.html http://www.fcc.gov/Speeches/misc/statements/bafranca.txt
    • the following table: LPFM Potential Interference Radius Based on NAB Tests Receiver Category Desired Signal Level -45 dBm (Close to Station) -55 dBm (~Principle Community) -65 dBm (~Protected Service) Clock 0.3 km (0.2 mi.) 0.7 km (0.4 mi.) 2.1 km (1.3 mi.) Portable 1.0 km (0.6 mi.) 0.9 km (0.6 mi.) 1.0 km (0.6 mi.) Personal 0.4 km (0.3 mi.) 0.5 km (0.3 mi.) 0.5 km (0.3 mi.) The above Table shows the approximate radius around an LPFM station where interference could potentially occur to a 3rd adjacent channel full service station with different types of radios, based on the NAB test data. As indicated in the Table, the area of potential interference depends on the type of radio used and
  • http://www.fcc.gov/cgb/dro/comments/99339/5507117144.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/cgb/dro/comments/99339/5507117144.txt
    • MTWTFSS I:WPM-1l:WPM MTWTFSS 8:00PM-1l:OOPM MTWTF8.S &OOPM-1l:OOPM MTWTFSS 8:WPM-11 :OOPH MTWTFSS8:WPM-1l:WPM MTWTFSS .SzWPM-1l:OOPM MTWTFSS 8:OOPM.11 :WPM MTWTFSS &OOPM-1 1 :OOPM For explanatiin of symbols, see Boilerplate. Copyright 2000 Nielsen Media Research 1607 1511 1348 1303 1221 1077 944 933 658 607 546 541 540 503 458 419 356 329 295 1.6 1.5 1.3 1.3 1.3 1.2 1.1 0.9 0.9 0.7 0.6 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 04 0.4 03 0.3 2.7 2.6 2.2 2.2 2.2 2 1.9 1.5 1.5 1.2 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.7 0.7 0.5 0.5 56.7 58.7 58.7 58.7 58.7 58.7 58.7 58.7 58.7 58.7 58.7 58.7 50.7 56.7 56.7 58.7 58.7 58.7 58.7 58.7 NielsenN National People Meter Page 1 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE The undersigned, Jette Ward,
  • http://www.fcc.gov/cgb/dro/trs_history_docket.html
    • 2, fifth bullet, the last sentence is revised to read as follows: The VRS rates shall be effective for the 2007-2008 through 2009-2010 Fund years, beginning on the first day of the month following the effective date of this Order, subject to annual adjustment as set forth below; (3) Paragraph 47, in the second-to-last sentence, "0.05 percent" is replaced by "0.5 percent"; (4) Paragraph 55, in the last sentence, "0.05 percent" is replaced by "0.5 percent"; (5) Paragraph 56, in the second-to-last sentence, "0.05 percent" is replaced by "0.5 percent"; (6) Paragraph 67, in the second-to-last sentence, "1,000,000" is replaced by "500,000"; (7) Paragraph 88, in the second-to-last sentence, delete ", as raised below in the FNPRM,[.]"; (8) Paragraph 103, in
  • http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2002/DOC-239154A1.html
    • 3. On that same day, FCC agent David Dombrowski of the Philadelphia Office used direction finding techniques to locate the source of the transmissions on the frequency 105.7 MHz to the Dunwoody Village, 3500 West Chester Pike, Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073. The FCC agent observed that the transmissions from the station could be detected with a standard car radio approximately 0.5 mile from the Dunwoody Village. Nancy Morrison, the Recreation Director, permitted agent Dombrowski to inspect the FM broadcast station. Nancy Morrison explained that the Dunwoody Village subscribes to an FM broadcast service on the frequency 105.7 MHz called ``Companion Radio.'' Networx Corporation installed and operates the FM broadcast station equipment at the Dunwoody Village to provide the service. 4. Radio
  • http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-260411A1.html
    • technical rules set forth elsewhere in this part and in accordance with the terms of the station authorization...(c) [t]he licensee must establish monitoring procedures and schedules for the station...'' Although the Commission authorized Station WBTE(AM) to broadcast from latitude 35 58' 00" North and longitude 076 56' 54" West (NAD27), the station was actually broadcasting from a location more than 0.5 km from its authorized coordinates. In addition, the station had not established monitoring procedures and schedules to determine compliance with 73.1560 regarding operating power and 73.1570 regarding modulation levels. 2.b. 47 C.F.R. 73.1560(a)(1): ``...]T]he antenna input power of an AM station as determined by the procedures specified in 73.51 must be maintained as near as is practicable to the authorized
  • http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-268426A1.html
    • applicable to their particular service as set forth in this title and with a valid authorization granted by the Commission under the provisions of this part..." At the time of inspection, Salvamex's fixed base transmitter, which is authorized to operate at 193 South Broadway, Yonkers, NY, was found operating at 54 Van Cortlandt Pk Avenue, Yonkers, NY, which is approximately 0.5 miles away from the authorized location. In addition, at the time of inspection, the owner of Salvamex admitted to operating 90 mobile units on the frequency 159.840 MHz. Salvamex is authorized to operate only 25 mobile units on that frequency. b. 47 C.F.R. S 90.425(a): "Except as provided for in paragraphs (d) and (e) of this section, each station or
  • http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-277833A1.html
    • 465.150 MHz was originating from a vehicle driven and solely occupied by Mr. McCollum. An officer of the Houston Police Department stopped the vehicle occupied by Mr. McCollum, and a search of the vehicle found an ICOM handheld radio programmed to transmit signals on the frequency 465.150 MHz. The ICOM radio was manufactured with two power settings, 5 watts and 0.5 watts and was not certified for use as a Part 15 device. 4. Based on the agents' experience with this type of radio transmitting equipment and the distance over which the signals were heard, the agents determined that the signals transmitted on December 13, 2006, and February 12, 2007 exceeded the limits for operation under Part 15 of the Commission's
  • http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-280559A1.html
    • the Rules provides that non-licensed broadcasting in the 216-960 MHz band is permitted only if the field strength of the transmission does not exceed 200 mV/m at three meters. 47 C.F.R. S: 15.209. Devices compliant with Part 15 typically have a range of less than one mile and are certified for use by the FCC for power levels less than 0.5 Watts. Section 312(f)(1) of the Act, 47 U.S.C. S: 312(f)(1), which applies to violations for which forfeitures are assessed under Section 503(b) of the Act, provides that "[t]he term 'willful', when used with reference to the commission or omission of any act, means the conscious and deliberate commission or omission of such act, irrespective of any intent to violate any
  • http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-304359A1.html
    • the District Director, San Francisco Office, Western Region, Enforcement Bureau: 1. This is a Notice of Violation ("Notice") issued pursuant to Section 1.89 of the Commission's Rules, to Churchill County Telephone and Telegraph registrant of antenna structure #1012853 in Fallon, Nevada. 2. On September 28, 2010, agents of the Enforcement Bureau's San Francisco Office inspected antenna structure #1012853 located approximately 0.5 mile southeast of Fallon Municipal Airport in Fallon, Nevada, and observed the following violation: 47 C.F.R. S: 17.21: "Antenna structures shall be painted and lighted when: (a) they exceed 60.96 meters (200 feet) in height above the ground or they require special aeronautical study." The FCC Antenna Structure Registration for antenna structure # 1012853 indicates painting and lighting in accordance
  • http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-307315A1.html
    • legally operate under FRS because it does not meet the technical regulations. The repeater, (1) was not certified for use under FRS, (2) employed an antenna that was not an integral part of the transmitter, and (3) was measured with a transmitter power output that, if connected to a no gain antenna, would produce an effective radiated power exceeding the 0.5 watt limit. (See 47 C.F.R. S:S: 95.191, 95.193, 95.603, 95.639(d), and 95.647). The frequency 462.5875 MHz is also available for use under the General Mobile Radio Service ("GMRS"). GMRS is a land mobile radio service available to persons for short-distance two-way communications to facilitate the activities of licensees and their immediate family members. The Irvine Company does not hold a
  • http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2002/FCC-02-112A1.html
    • Regulatory, 1401 I Street, N.W., Suite 1100, Washington, D.C. 20005. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION William F. Caton Acting Secretary _________________________ 1 We note that the Enforcement Bureau issued the Notice of Apparent Liability in this case under its delegated authority, but has now referred the matter to the Commission given the significance of the challenge to the Commission's authority. 47 C.F.R. 0.5(c) (``the staff is at liberty to refer any matter at any stage to the Commission for action, upon concluding that it involves matters warranting the Commission's consideration''). 2 47 U.S.C. 218, 403, 154(i), 154(j). 3 SBC Communications, Inc., Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture, 16 FCC Rcd 19370 (2001) (``NAL''). 4 See Oct. 1, 2001 Letter from Charles W. Kelley,
  • http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2004/DA-04-3267A1.html
    • coordination.16 Uniradio asserted that, under the circumstances, any enforcement action by the Commission, including revocation of its Section 325(c) permit, is not warranted.17 5. On March 26, 2004, NIBC filed a reply to Uniradio's response.18 NIBC maintained, and provided evidence, that Station XEMO's operations at its current antenna site has created further overlap of its contour to Station KLRA(AM)'s protected 0.5 mV/m contour.19 NIBC further maintained that, due to the increased overlap, Station XEMO's utilization of a narrow bandwidth and reduction to a power level of 5 kW have not proven effective in redressing the continuing substantial interference to Station KRLA(AM).20 Finally, NIBC maintained that Uniradio knew or should have known that Station XEMO's operations at its current site had not
  • http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2004/FCC-04-196A1.html
    • that a copy of this Memorandum Opinion and Order shall be sent by Certified Mail Return Receipt Requested to Lara Mahaney, Director of Corporate and Entertainment Affairs, Parents Television Council, 325 South Patrick Street, Alexandria, VA 23114. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Marlene H. Dortch Secretary _________________________ 1 The Enforcement Bureau has referred this matter to the full Commission pursuant to Section 0.5(c) of the Rules. 47 C.F.R. 0.5(c)(2002). This Memorandum Opinion and Order denies a complaint the Commission received concerning broadcasts of this program. 2 See 18 U.S.C. 1464 (2002), and 47 C.F.R. 73.3999 (2002). 3 See Letter to David Solomon, Chief, Enforcement Bureau, from Lara Mahaney, Director of Corporate and Entertainment Affairs, Parents Television Council, dated August 22, 2003 (``Complaint''). The
  • http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2006/FCC-06-173A1.html
    • EMR-300 meters and Type 25 probes ("W&G Meters") and Narda Model 8718 meters and Model 8722 probes ("Narda Meters"). When conducting the on-off tests and individual station measurements on July 12, 2002, the agents used the W&G Meters exclusively. 19 FCC Rcd at 23931, n.63. The manufacturer-specified uncertainty factors for the W&G Meters and the Narda Meters extend from +/- 0.5 dB to +/- 3 dB, depending on various factors, including, for example, the magnitude of the measurement, the frequency response, the isotropic deviation and the measurement methodology. Telemundo also argues that no sanctions can be justified against KWHY because if a "measurement yields a 5, plus or minus 2, it is equally valid to argue that the `real' measurement is
  • http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2007/FCC-07-125A1.html
    • PR); WPEZ750 (Santurce, PR); WPFA265 (San Juan, PR); WPFA266 (Santurce, PR); WPFA268 (Santurce, PR); WPFA269 (Santurce, PR); WPFA270 (Santurce, PR); WPFA273 (Santurce, PR); WPFA278 (Santurce, PR); WPFA280 (Santurce, PR); WPFD607 (Santurce, PR); WPFD808 (Santurce, PR); WPFD809 (Santurce, PR); WPFD810 (Santurce, PR); WPFD811 (Santurce, PR); WPFD812 (Santurce, PR); WPFE472 (Santurce, PR); WPFE934 (Cayey, PR); WPFG589 (no ULS address; coordinates 18-16-08.8 N, 066-04-00.5 W); WPFG599 (Caguas, PR); WPFM597 (Cayey, PR); WPFM600 (San Juan, PR); WPFN354 (Aguada, PR); WPFN600 (Anasco, PR); WPFN636 (Anasco, PR); WPFN725 (Anasco, PR); WPFQ293 (Charlotte Amalie, VI); WPFS846 (Saint Croix, VI); WPFS856 (Saint Croix, VI); WPFT334 (Saint Croix, VI); WPFT335 (Saint Croix, VI); WPFT335 (Aguada, PR); WPFT356 (Aguada, PR); WPFT357 (Saint Croix, VI); WPFT369 (Charlotte Amalie, VI); WPFT416 (Charlotte Amalie,
  • http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2011/DA-11-816A1.html
    • the occupational limit fence around the perimeter of this site with warning signs to enclose the area below occupational limits but above public exposure RFR limits. As such the occupational RFR limits apply inside the inner fence. Public limits apply outside the outer fence. The maximum RFR reading at the site was 0.89 milliwatts/cm2 along the north inner fence at 0.5 meters from the ground. Levels along the other inner fence borders ranged from 0.13 milliwatts/cm2 to 0.32 milliwatts/cm2. Additionally, one location outside the inner fence showed a reading of 0.79 milliwatts/cm2. This was 5 meters west northwest of the northwest corner of the fenced area at 0.5 meters from ground level. This was the highest level between the two fence
  • http://www.fcc.gov/eb/otherinfo/fcc97218.html
    • of assessing reasonable forfeitures to ensure substantial compliance by licensees and therefore, the amounts should be reduced. In support, they noted that common carrier forfeitures issued before the statutory increase were seldom more than 25 percent of the maximum, and that forfeitures assessed after the statutory increase but before the implementation of the prior policy statement were no more than 0.5 percent of the new one million dollar maximum. Emery Comments, 11-12. NAB and MCI also agreed that the base amounts suggested in the proposed forfeiture guidelines were too high and should be reduced by 50 percent with the exception of tower safety violations. NAB Comments, 5; MCI Reply Comments, 3. 19. The legislative history of Section 503 of the Act
  • http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-1932A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-1932A1.pdf
    • new interference to WABA(AM) by increasing the 25% Root Sum Square (``RSS'') limit to WABA(AM) in violation of Section 73.182 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''). This would decrease WABA(AM)'s existing nighttime interference-free (``NIF'') service by some 13,000 listeners. The May 4 Letter also stated that: (1) WFTL(AM)'s proposed 0.025 mV/m -10% skywave contour would overlap the 50 kW nighttime 0.5 mV/m - 50% skywave contour of co-channel Mexican stations XETQ and XETQ1, Orizaba, VC, in violation of the US/Mexico Treaty; (2) WFTL(AM)'s proposed 0.025 mV/m contour would overlap the protected 0.5 mV/m daytime groundwave contour of co-channel Cuban stations CMGB, Trinidad, and CMJB, Mayari Arrib; and (3) the tower registration for the seventh nighttime tower in WFTL(AM)'s proposed directional array
  • http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-4389A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-4389A1.pdf
    • the required spacing, in rugged mountain range where interference to short-spaced station was unlikely). See WREL, Inc., Memorandum Opinion and Order, 68 FCC2d 1043 (1978), aff'd, 45 R.R. 2d 319 (1979) (waiver of former radio contour overlap rule for overlap of 8.1 sq. miles with 185 people, with area of overlap comprising 2 percent of one station's service area and 0.5 percent of the other's, where applicant surrendered authorization for a third station). See Reply at 6 (citing Caloosa Television Corporation, Memorandum Opinion and Order, 3 FCC Rcd 3656 (1988), on recon. 4 FCC Rcd 4762 (1989) (waiver of spacing rules based on combination of several public interest factors); Time Warner, Inc., Memorandum Opinion and Order, 12 FCC Rcd 15300 (CSB
  • http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-08-161A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-08-161A1.pdf
    • as Section 307(b) issues. WSLW(AM) is the sole local transmission service licensed at White Sulphur Springs, West Virginia (2000 Census population of 2,315). Quorum/WVJT propose to change WSLW(AM)'s community of license to Bexley, Ohio (2000 Census population of 13,203) as that community's first local radio transmission service. WVJT claims in its Section 307(b) analysis that ``[n]o portion of the WSLW 0.5 mV/m contour is served by fewer than two existing aural services.'' On April 11, 2007, Positive Alternative Radio, Inc. (``PAR'') filed a Consolidated Petition to Deny against, inter alia, the Application, arguing that the Application violates the Commission's policy against removal of sole local service from a community, and also that Quorum/WVJT propose to build two new towers without providing
  • http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-08-1660A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-08-1660A1.pdf
    • Rules defines an AM secondary service area as the area served by the station's skywave signal. Class A stations provide nighttime secondary service entitled to protection from co-channel station interference, but Class B stations provide only primary service. Accordingly, as a result of KGA(AM)'s proposed change in status from Class A to Class B, it would no longer have protected 0.5 mV/m skywave secondary service. As a result of nighttime skywave propagation, the signals of powerful clear channel stations, such as KGA(AM), can extend for hundreds of miles. However, due to innate variations in signal strength, service may be intermittent at any given point within the protected contour. Skywave service is subject to a lower level of interference protection than a
  • http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-08-1946A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-08-1946A1.pdf
    • the WMCW Petition as moot because, with the surrender of the WMCW(AM) license, there are no longer any facilities to modify. Background. Station WONX(AM) is licensed to operate on 1590 kHz with a power of 3.5 kW daytime and 2.5 kW nighttime, employing a four-tower directional antenna system. Station WMCW(AM) is licensed on 1600 KHz with a daytime power of 0.5 kW and a nighttime power of 0.018 kW, employing a non-directional antenna system. In the IRA, the parties propose: (1) grant of the WONX(AM) Application, which would increase WONX(AM)'s daytime power to 7 kW; and (2) surrender of the WMCW(AM) license. In the IRA, the applicants contend that grant of the proposals will increase service from WONX(AM), eliminate existing prohibited
  • http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-08-2392A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-08-2392A1.pdf
    • proposed contingent facilities changes. We will therefore examine the parties' IRA here in light of these four factors. Reduction in Interference. The IRA states that the licensed facilities of WBIS are predicted to cause interference to the licensed operations of WFYL(AM), King of Prussia, Pennsylvania. It demonstrates that the WBIS(AM), Annapolis, Maryland, interfering contour overlaps a portion of the WFYL 0.5 mV/m coverage contour. Removal of WBIS will permit interference-free service by WFYL to 113,749 people (2000 US Census data) over an area of 419 square kilometers. Increased Service. The IRA indicates that the Station's proposed power increase will result in the 0.5 mV/m contour covering 6,283,850 people in an 18,060 square kilometer area. This is 5,090,414 persons and 12,222 square
  • http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-08-347A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-08-347A1.pdf
    • For the reasons set forth below we deny the petition for reconsideration. Background. On January 5, 2006, SIBR filed the above-captioned application for a license to cover a construction permit. The construction permit authorized SIBR to construct a new Class B AM station, KPOE, on 880 kilohertz at Midland, Texas. The station was to employ 2.0 kW daytime power and 0.5 kW nighttime power using different daytime and nighttime transmitter sites and directional antenna systems. On March 17, 2006, the staff dismissed the above-captioned license to cover application as patently defective. The staff found that: (1) the authorized KPOE(AM) nighttime facilities were not constructed before the construction permit expiration date of December 16, 2005; (2) SIBR failed to submit complete nondirectional
  • http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-09-2627A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-09-2627A1.pdf
    • noncommercial licensees did not have minimum hour requirements. Approximately nine months passed before AERS alerted the Commission to KWMD's silence. File No. BPED-20040312AAA (granted July 30, 2004; expired July 30, 2007. Permit cancelled.) File No. BSTA-20040621ACV (granted August 3, 2004; expired November 3, 2004). AERS' original CP authorized it to operate KWMD at Kasilof with effective radiated power (``ERP'') of 0.5 kilowatts. The license to cover authorized .31 kW. CP BPED-20040312AAA authorized a change in transmitter site, a change in frequency and ERP of 4 kilowatts. This STA permits operation of KWMD with .31 kilowatts. File No. BLSTA-20040824AGX (granted August 26, 2004; expired February 26, 2005). File No. BSTA-20050928AJX (expired January 26, 2006). AERS stated in its September 2005 STA that
  • http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-10-1709A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-10-1709A1.pdf
    • County, Michigan] at 43 5314 N 840651 W.'' Furthermore, in a declaration, Midland board member Norman Moll states: On October 15, 2008, fellow-Church Board member Reid Tait and I visited the unincorporated area known as Mount Forest, Michigan . . . . As shown on [a yahoo] map, Mount Forest lies along a road named Main Street, stretching for about 0.5 mile north from the intersection with West Mt. Forest Road. The area is rural in nature, sparsely populated and has no defined boundaries. I observed not more than approximately 15 residences throughout the Mount Forest are. Upon a thorough review of the entire area, I observed no presently active commercial, religious, social or governmental establishments in Mount Forest . .
  • http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-11-1227A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-11-1227A1.pdf
    • 4622 (1991), Calvary Educational Broadcasting Network, Inc., Hearing Designation Order, 7 FCC Red 4037 (1992). It is Bureau policy generally not to grant a license renewal application for a station that is off the air. 47 U.S.C. § 309(f). For AM - 5 mV/m; for commercial FM - 3.16 mV/m; for noncommercial educational FM - 1.0 mV/m. For AM - 0.5 mV/m contour; for FM - 1.0 mV/m contour. . . See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1914. Estimated by the staff. The STA request specified an efficiency of 300 mV/m/km/kW; however, experience indicates that the efficiency of a long wire antenna is substantially less. See 47 CFR §§ 73.45(c), 73.51, 73.61(b). See 47 CFR § 1.1310. Special Temporary Authorizations by nature are
  • http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/FCC-02-286A2.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/FCC-02-286A2.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/FCC-02-286A2.txt
    • transmission facilities Level II: Non-GPS-locked transmission facilities Normally, transmission facilities will operate as Level I facilities in order to support numerous advanced system features. Analog Diversity Delay a level of -6 dB from full scale will be applied to both the analog and digital transmit signal paths. The tone will be a pulsed signal, consisting of a repeating pattern of 0.5 seconds on followed by 4.5 seconds off. RF Carrier Frequency and OFDM Symbol Clock For synchronization Level I transmission facilities, the absolute accuracy of the carrier frequency and OFDM symbol clock frequency will be maintained to within 1 part per 108 at all times. For synchronization Level II transmission facilities, the absolute accuracy of the carrier frequency and OFDM symbol
  • http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/FCC-02-286A3.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/FCC-02-286A3.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/FCC-02-286A3.txt
    • ansmission facilities. Diversity delay accuracy will be verified with a calibrated test receiver receiving the RF channel under test. A digitally generated 4-kHz sinusoidal test tone at a level of -6 dB from full scale will be applied to both the analog and digital transmit signal paths. The tone will be a pulsed signal, consisting of a repeating pattern of 0.5 seconds on, followed by 4.5 seconds off. Time and Frequency Accuracy and Stability The total modulation symbol-clock frequency absolute error shall be budgeted according to the following requirements: For the entire end-to-end system: ±101 ppm maximum Caused by the receive system: ±100 ppm maximum Caused by the broadcast system: ±1 ppm maximum for synchronization Level I facilities ±.01 ppm maximum
  • http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/FCC-03-127A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/FCC-03-127A1.pdf
    • of FCC MOWG Study No. 8 provides information on Internet access. Respondents who said they have home access to the Internet were asked a follow-up question regarding how they access the Internet. The answers (in percentages) were as follows: cable line 18.9 percent, DSL line 14.7 percent, telephone line 66.1 percent, other 3.5 percent, don't know 5.9 percent, and refuse 0.5 percent. The responses sum to 109.6 percent. If we take the 99.7 percent of respondents who picked cable, DSL, or telephone line as the base, and if we combine telephone and DSL, the resulting shares are 19 percent cable and 81 percent telephone. We recognize that, given the relatively small share of Internet in the total diversity market (12.5% weight),
  • http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/FCC-04-155A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/FCC-04-155A1.pdf
    • the Association for Community Education, Inc. for license to cover the modified construction permit for FM translator station K211DK IS GRANTED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Marlene H. Dortch Secretary SMCCD is the license of NCE-FM station KCRW(FM), Santa Monica, California. Letter to John S. Neely, Esq. and Harold K. McCombs, Esq., (M.M. Bur. Nov. 1, 2001). Pursuant to 47 C.F.R. Section 0.5(c), the Bureau has referred the license application to the Commission as a matter of administrative convenience. One of the issues raised in the application for review is properly considered only in the context of the K211DK license application. File No. BPFT-19960910TB. 47 C.F.R. § 74.1204(f) reads as follows: An application for an FM translator station will not be accepted for
  • http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/FCC-08-114A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/FCC-08-114A1.pdf
    • 13 FCC Rcd at 15965. In both the Mutually Exclusive Public Notice and the Letter to Sharon Berlin Ingles, Powell Meredith Communications Company, and TELNS Broadcasting Company, Inc., Letter, Ref. No. 1800B3-TSN (MMB Oct. 22, 2001) (``October Section 307(b) Request''), the Bureau requested the following information from all applicants: ``(1) the area and population within the proposed 2 mV/m and 0.5 mV/m contours; (2) the number of stations licensed to the proposed community of license; (3) the number of stations providing protected service to the proposed community of license; (4) the population (according to the latest Census data) of the proposed community of license; (5) a description of the civic, cultural, religious, social and commercial attributes of the proposed community of
  • http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/FCC-08-136A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/FCC-08-136A1.pdf
    • developed than Winchester, and thus has a greater need for an additional aural broadcast service. 5. We deny the Application for Review. We uphold the Bureau's finding that the Johnson application is entitled to a dispositive Section 307(b) preference because the Johnson proposal will serve a substantially larger number of persons. Specifically, Johnson proposes to serve 1,340,944 persons within his 0.5 mV/m contour and 1,327,925 persons within his 2 mV/m contour, while the Bate proposal would yield 0.5 mV/m service to 99,701 persons and 2 mV/m service to 83,461 persons. 6. The Bureau correctly considered the respective needs of St. George and the Las Vegas Urbanized Area for additional service. Both communities receive abundant service. Because of this, Bate's contention regarding
  • http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/FCC-08-137A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/FCC-08-137A1.pdf
    • for Review, finding the Bureau did not err in concluding the Eustis application is entitled to a dispositive Section 307(b) preference. We uphold the Reconsideration Decision based upon the fact that the Eustis proposal will serve a substantially larger number of persons. Specifically, the Eustis proposal will serve 59,557 persons within the 2 mV/m contour and 211,443 persons within the 0.5 mV/m contour. In comparison, the Bate proposal will serve 9,394 persons within the 2 mV/m contour and 55,001 persons within the 0.5 mV/m contour. The difference in the respective nighttime interference-free contours also is decisionally significant. The Eustis proposal for Johnstown will serve 4,895 within the 14.4 mV/m contour while the Bate proposal would serve 2,734 persons within the 9.2
  • http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/FCC-08-216A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/FCC-08-216A1.pdf
    • Letter, Ref. No. 1800B3-TSN (MMB October 22, 2001) (``October Section 307(b) Request''). The October Section 307(b) Request bore OMB Control No. 3060-0996. October Section 307(b) Request at 2-3. Terry F. Berman, Esq., and Dennis J. Kelly, Esq., Letter, Ref. No. 1800B3-JR (MMB Mar. 28, 2002). Pamplin proposed to serve 207,514 persons within its 2 mV/m contour and 364,294 within its 0.5 mV/m contour. Kidd's proposal would have served 27,471 persons within the 2 mV/m contour and 317,281 in its 0.5 mV/m contour. Additionally, Pamplin proposed nighttime interference-free service to 77,975 persons, compared with such service to 9,416 under Kidd's proposal. Petition for Reconsideration at 3-4. See Family Broadcasting Group, Decision, 93 FCC2d 771, 779 (Rev. Bd. 1983), review denied, FCC 83-559
  • http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/FCC-08-250A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/FCC-08-250A1.pdf
    • Requested, to Christian Voice of Central Ohio, Inc., c/o David J. Kaufman, Esq., Rini Coran, PC, 1615 L Street, N.W., Suite 1325, Washington, DC 20036. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Marlene H. Dortch Secretary See Christian Voice of Central Ohio, Petition for Reconsideration (filed June 9, 2008) (``Petition''). The Enforcement Bureau has referred this matter to the full Commission pursuant to Section 0.5(c) of the Rules. See 47 C.F.R. § 0.5(c). See also 47 C.F.R. § 1.106(a)(1). In April 2004, after the complaint initiating this matter had been filed, but before the Enforcement Bureau had inquired into the matter, Christian Voice sought to modify the Station's noncommercial educational license so that it could operate WCVZ(FM) as a commercial facility. See File No. BMLH-20040415AEI,
  • http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/FCC-12-29A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/FCC-12-29A1.pdf
    • to any person or entity having any interest whatsoever, or any connection with a primary FM station. Interested and connected parties extend to group owners, corporate parents, shareholders, officers, directors, employees, general and limited partners, family members and business associates. For the purposes of this paragraph, the protected contour of the primary station shall be defined as follows: the predicted 0.5mV/m contour for commercial Class B stations, the predicted 0.7 mV/m contour for commercial Class B1 stations and the predicted 1 mV/m field strength contour for all other FM radio broadcast stations. The contours shall be as predicted in accordance with § 73.313(a) through (d) of this chapter. In the case of an FM radio broadcast station authorized with facilities in
  • http://www.fcc.gov/ftp/Bureaus/MB/Databases/source_code/amstability.html
    • critical */ { ftol = 0.0080; /* 0.80% under */ ptol = 0.80; /* 0.80 degrees */ } if(inc == 13) /* more critical */ { ftol = 0.0075; /* 0.75% under */ ptol = 0.75; /* 0.75 degrees */ } if(inc == 14) /* more critical */ { ftol = 0.0075; /* 0.5% under */ ptol = 0.75; /* 0.5 degrees */ } if(inc == 15) /* more critical */ { ftol = 0.0065; /* 0.65% under */ ptol = 0.65; /* 0.65 degrees */ } if(inc == 16) /* more critical */ { ftol = 0.0060; /* 0.6% under */ ptol = 0.60; /* 0.6 degrees */ } if(inc == 17) /* more critical */ { ftol = 0.0055;
  • http://www.fcc.gov/ftp/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Databases/documents_collection/01-60.doc http://www.fcc.gov/ftp/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Databases/documents_collection/01-60.pdf
    • maintained to within ±3 deg. of the values specified on the instrument of authorization. Section 73.68 is amended by revising subsections (a)(2), (d)(2) and (d)(3) to read as follows: § 73.68 Sampling systems for antenna monitors. ***** (a)(2) Sampling lines for directional antennas may be of different lengths provided the phase difference of signals at the monitor are less than 0.5 degree between the shortest and longest cable lengths due to temperature variations to which the system is exposed. ***** (d)(2) Immediately prior to modification or replacement of components of the sampling system, and after a verification that all monitoring point values and operating parameters are within the limits or tolerances specified in the rules, the following indications must be recorded
  • http://www.fcc.gov/ftp/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Databases/documents_collection/76-101.html http://www.fcc.gov/ftp/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Databases/documents_collection/76-101.pdf
    • our rules ( 73.52(b) ). Assume that, to maintain the relative phases within this tolerance, a monitoring accuracy of one-half this tolerance, or 1.5 degrees represents good engineering practice. The repeatability of the type approved monitor is 1 degree ( 73.53(c)(13)(ii) ). The permissible variation in samples presented to the monitor, caused by the temperature variations, should therefore not exceed 0.5 degree. Accordingly, we believe, a reasonable basis for determining the tolerable difference in the length of lines is to ascertain, considering the phase / temperature characteristic of the line employed, and the temperature variation to which the line would be subject on a diurnal and seasonal basis, that, as between the longest and shortest sampling lines proposed, a temperature phase
  • http://www.fcc.gov/ftp/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Databases/documents_collection/96-113.doc http://www.fcc.gov/ftp/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Databases/documents_collection/96-113.pdf
    • stations can be moved to other frequencies; (b) that the Order is in error in not permitting the use of actual measured data to resolve potential allotment interference between proposed expanded band stations and federal travellers information stations; and (c) that standards proposed in the Order fail to protect stations on certain frequencies from second harmonic interference and that using 0.5 mV/m contours for station interference protection are too restrictive. WGNY offers alternative standards. 7. WGNY was excluded from an expanded band allotment for one of three preclusion factors: (1) the United States-Canadian agreement, (2) stations of higher ranking, or (3) interference with federal travellers information stations. As we noted, federal travellers information stations licensed by the National Telecommunications and Information
  • http://www.fcc.gov/ftp/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Databases/documents_collection/97-276.pdf
    • are to be used in conjunction with the proposed effective radiated power and antenna height above average terrain, as calculated pursuant to '73.313(c), (d)(2) and (d)(3), using data for as many radials as necessary, to determine the location of the undesired (interfering) field strength. Predicted interference is defined to exist only for locations where the desired (service) field strength exceeds 0.5 mV/m (54 dBu) for a Class B station, 0.7 mV/m (57 dBu) for a Class B1 station, and 1 mV/m (60 dBu) for any other class of station. (i) Co-channel interference is predicted to exist, for the purpose of this section, at all locations where the undesired (interfering station) F(50,10) field strength exceeds a value 20 dB below the desired
  • http://www.fcc.gov/ftp/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Databases/documents_collection/AttachB-04-18-1997.html
    • exhibit number in the box provided. * Question 14 must be answered completely if a new site and/or new tower construction is proposed. Question 14(b) must give the distance in meters from the tower to the fence enclosing the tower. * Question 15: + Question 15, Parts A-1 and A-2 (daytime) must be answered. However, only the 5 mV/m and 0.5 mV/m contours need be submitted. In response to question 15, part A-2, the daytime 5 mV/m contour must encompass the entire legal boundaries of the community of license. In calculating the distance to the groundwave contours, all known pertinent ground conductivity measurements must be used. [3]Footnote 1. + Question 15, parts A-3(a), A-3(b), A-3(c) and A-3(d) do not have to
  • http://www.fcc.gov/ftp/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Databases/documents_collection/let19960216.html
    • been authorized, and as shown above, directly contravenes the Act and the Commission's Rules. [51]Footnote 23: See [52]note 7, supra. [53]Footnote 24: Section 73.3516(a) provides in relevant part that "no application will be accepted for filing if it requests an alternate frequency or channel." 47 C.F.R. 73.3516(a). [54]Footnote 25: Under the R&O's priority scheme, "[d]aytime only stations located within the 0.5 mV/m-50% skywave contours of Class I stations and which are licensed to serve communities of 100,000 or more that currently lack a local fulltime aural service will be considered first priority among daytime-only facilities." R&O, 6 FCC Rcd at 6311. [55]Footnote 26: The R&O created this specific preference based upon guidance contained in Section 331(b) of the Act. That section
  • http://www.fcc.gov/ftp/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Databases/documents_collection/let19961205.doc
    • above-captioned application filed by Unity Broadcasting Network-New York, Inc. ("Unity"), licensee of WWRL(AM), New York, New York, for a major change to the broadcast facilities of WWRL(AM). This construction permit application seeks consent for WWRL(AM) to increase its daytime operating power from 5 kW to 25 kW and to make changes in its directional antenna system to increase WWRL(AM)'s interference-free 0.5 mV/m daytime contour. In conjunction with this application, Unity has filed an Amended Joint Petition to Grant Applications Pursuant to Interference Reduction Agreements ("Joint Petition"). Additionally, Unity requests a waiver of 47 C.F.R. Section 73.37, as grant of the above-captioned application would result in de minimus contour overlap. Furthermore, a petition to deny the above-captioned application was filed on November
  • http://www.fcc.gov/ib/pd/pf/csreport.pdf
    • 34% of the total circuits used; International Private Line Services accounted for 62%; and the remaining 4% of total circuits were used for Video and other data services (outside of traditional private line services). The ratio of IMTS to private line services has continued to decrease from 1.4 in 1996, to 1.2 in 1997, to 0.8 in 1998, and to 0.5 in 1999. By transmission type, undersea cables account for 57% of total activated circuits, an increase of 3% from 1998; terrestrial links account for 36%, a decrease of 2% from 1998; and satellites account for 7% of the total activated capacity, a decrease of 1% from 1998. The top 30 destinations among all international routes account for 94% of the
  • http://www.fcc.gov/ib/pd/pf/csreport_2000.pdf
    • destinations in 2000, replacing Dominican Republic and Egypt. Only two of the top 30 destinations experienced heavier capacity use on IMTS than on private lines and other data services in 2000. The overall ratio of IMTS to private line and other data services has continued to decrease from 1.1 to 1 in 1997, to 0.8 to 1 in 1998, to 0.5 to 1 in 1999, and to 0.3 to 1 in 2000. The ratios of IMTS to private line and other data services for the top 30 destinations, as well as for each region, are also listed in Table 6. Supplementary Data Table 7 lists all operational trans-oceanic fiber optic cables in 64 Kbps units, and planned new cables whose applications
  • http://www.fcc.gov/ib/sand/agree/files/can-nb/220fin.pdf
    • 5 kHz, shall be the applicable maximum ERP depending on Antenna Height Above Average Terrain described in Table 1 of Annex B. 1The maximum ERP for these stations can not be greater than the maximum ERP determined by their antenna height above average terrain. TABLE 2 Distance from border (km) ERP (watts) Less than 0.3 Operations not permitted 0.3 - 0.5 5 0.5 - 0.6 10 0.6 - 0.8 20 0.8 - 2.0 25 2.0 - 4.0 50 4.0 - 5.0 100 5.0 - 6.0 200 beyond 6.0 500 2. In the 221-222 MHz band, the maximum effective radiated power allowable for mobile units shall be 50 watts. Portable units are considered mobile units. Fixed stations transmitting in this band are
  • http://www.fcc.gov/ib/sand/agree/files/mex-bc/am.pdf
    • calculated values where necessary. 3.6 Sunrise and sunset time To facilitate the determination of the Local. time of sunrise and sunset ,Figure 6 gives therimes for various geographical latitudes and for each month of the year. The time is the local meridian time at the point concerned and should be converted to the appropriate standard time. 0.2 0.3 0.4 ' 0.5 0.6 ilfura c3 la cn:,lnu zn Icqftud cl: onda (3.1 Niwrc C? raciides IlZ43rk p.-.-- . -___-. __ ___ ______--. .-.. . . . . ---- - -- ----- -_-.- . - -_--.. -------9 .-. B.-e . ..--. ..-. . - - ---- - FIGURE la - A: Short vertical antenna Field strength at a distance of 1 k?n as
  • http://www.fcc.gov/ib/sand/agree/files/mex-bc/usmexdars.pdf
    • of the IFIC Partie de IFIC Parte del IFIC SECTION SPECIALE / SPECIAL SECTION / SECCION ESPECIAL AR11/C/3269 RES33/C/83 A A1a Space stationUSASAT-28F A1f Notifying adm.USA BR1 Date of receipt.21.11.1997 BR20/BR21 IFIC no./part BR6a/BR6b Id. no. 97520353 BR3a/BR3b Provision referenceRR1060 C BR2 Adm. serial no. A4a1 Orbital long. 85 W A4a2a Long. tolerance0.1 W - 0.1 E A4a2b Inclination excursion 0.5 A4a3 Visibility arc 110 W - 70 W A4a4 Service arc87 W - 85 W A4a5 Reason for arc diff. 1 B1a/B1b Beam designationSD B2 Emi-RcpE B3a1/B3b1/B3b2a Max. ant. gain 38.5 B3d Pointing accuracy 0.15 B3a2/B3b2b Ant. gain cont. diag. 2 B3f Ant. gain vs orbit long. diag. B3e1 Rad. diag. B3e2 Ref. pat. B3e3 Coef. A B3e4 Coef. B
  • http://www.fcc.gov/ib/sand/agree/files/mex-nb/boundary.pdf
    • kHz for 100% at 1000 Hz Oscillator frequency stability:0.0005% from -30C to +6OC ambient. Frequency tolerance:Fixed/Mobile -- 5 ppm Handie-talkie -- 25 ppm Transmitter sideband noise:-90 dB @ +/- 30 kHz -105 dB @ +/- 1 MHz Spurious & harmonics:more than 85 dB below carrier Receiver: --- Oscillator frequency stability:0.0005% from -30C to +6OC ambient Sensitivity: 20 dB Quieting -- 0.5 UV EIA Sinad-- 0.35 uv selectivity (EIA Sinad): -90 dB Intermodulation (EIA Sinad):-80 dB Spurious & image rejection: 100 dB minimum Squelch sensitivity:0.2 uV or less General: --- Type of antenna:Fixed system --0 to 6 dB omnidirectional 8 to 10 dB directional Antenna polarization:Vertical Hours: 24 hours (continuous) -2- ?.echnical Data for International Boundary C Water Commission, Mexican Section,VHF Radio
  • http://www.fcc.gov/ib/sand/agree/files/mex-nb/finall.pdf
    • FREQUENCY OFFSET (KHZ): 0 EMISSION DESIGNATOR: 5M75C3F 250KF3E FREQUENCY GROUP: E CALL SIGN OR FILE NO.: 14693-CM-P-83 CITY/STATE: SAN DIEGO, CA LATITUDE: 32 41 48 N. LONGITUDE: 116 56 10 W. GROUND ELEVATION (METERS): 769 ANTENNA CENTERLINE HEIGHT (METERS): 30 ANTENNA OVERALL HEIGHT (METERS): 30.9 ANTENNA BEAMWIDTH (DEGREES): 360 ANTENNA AZIMUTH (IF DIRECTIONAL, DEGREES): NOT APPLICABLE ANTENNA BEAM TILT (DEGREES): 0.5 ANTENNA RADIATION PATTERN: ANDREW HMD8VO ANTENNA MAXIMUM GAIN (DBI): 11 TRANSMITTER NOMINAL POWER (WATTS) 10 E.I.R.P. (DBW): 18 TRANSMITTER LINE LOSS (DB): 3 ANTENNA POLARIZATION: VERTICAL FREQUENCY OFFSET (KHZ): 0 EMISSION DESIGNATOR: 5M75C3F 250KF3E FREQUENCY GROUP: F - 5 - CALL SIGN OR FILE NO.: WHQ-403* CITY/STATE: SAN DIEGO, CA LATITUDE: 32 41 47 N. LONGITUDE: 116 56 07 W.
  • http://www.fcc.gov/ib/sand/agree/files/mex-nb/specpurp.pdf
    • Oscillator Frequency Stability: 0.0005% from-30 C to +60 C ambient. Frequency Tolerance: +/-800 Hz of center frequency Transmitter.Side Band Noise: 90 dB @ +/- 30 KHz (unmodulated carrier) 105 dB @ +/- 1 MHz Spurious & Harmonics: more than 85 dB below carrier Receiver Oscillator Frequency Stability: 0.0005% from-30 C to +60 C ambient. Sensitivity: 20 dB Quieting less than 0.5 UV EIA Sinad less than 0.35 UV Selectivity (EIA Sinad): -95 dB +/- 30 KHz -- Inter-modulation (EIA Sinad): -80 dB Spurious & Image Rejection: 100 dB minimum Squelch Sensitivity: 0.20 uV or less General Type of Antenna: Fixed system 6 dB omnidirectional Transportable system 3 dB omnidirectional Polarization: vertical Hours: 24 hours (Continuous) Ir
  • http://www.fcc.gov/ib/sand/agree/files/mex-nb/usmexdars.pdf
    • of the IFIC Partie de IFIC Parte del IFIC SECTION SPECIALE / SPECIAL SECTION / SECCION ESPECIAL AR11/C/3269 RES33/C/83 A A1a Space stationUSASAT-28F A1f Notifying adm.USA BR1 Date of receipt.21.11.1997 BR20/BR21 IFIC no./part BR6a/BR6b Id. no. 97520353 BR3a/BR3b Provision referenceRR1060 C BR2 Adm. serial no. A4a1 Orbital long. 85 W A4a2a Long. tolerance0.1 W - 0.1 E A4a2b Inclination excursion 0.5 A4a3 Visibility arc 110 W - 70 W A4a4 Service arc87 W - 85 W A4a5 Reason for arc diff. 1 B1a/B1b Beam designationSD B2 Emi-RcpE B3a1/B3b1/B3b2a Max. ant. gain 38.5 B3d Pointing accuracy 0.15 B3a2/B3b2b Ant. gain cont. diag. 2 B3f Ant. gain vs orbit long. diag. B3e1 Rad. diag. B3e2 Ref. pat. B3e3 Coef. A B3e4 Coef. B
  • http://www.fcc.gov/ib/sand/mniab/traffic/files/ITRND01.pdf
    • 33.2 35.5 49.9 9.2 Philippines 37.0 42.9 42.3 50.2 33.4 50.8 38.9 57.3 73.3 104.3 85.4 18.0 Poland 28.7 34.0 31.5 27.1 27.3 27.8 24.9 24.2 13.3 20.0 16.1 -10.8 Russia 31.6 30.2 26.6 31.0 29.8 22.0 17.4 27.6 54.9 24.1 18.1 2.0 Saudi Arabia 29.8 28.2 24.1 27.2 31.8 36.9 32.0 24.0 35.7 30.3 27.8 -3.3 Sierra Leone 0.4 0.5 0.5 1.0 1.2 1.2 0.6 1.2 1.1 1.9 1.3 11.0 Singapore 37.7 43.5 51.1 53.5 61.4 65.8 26.4 72.7 73.5 65.0 87.7 12.6 South Africa 20.8 24.3 26.7 29.3 31.1 36.5 38.9 39.0 28.1 36.7 77.9 9.8 Spain 45.4 51.8 46.1 61.5 85.3 76.0 85.1 112.0 108.3 144.4 139.0 14.0 Switzerland 66.1 73.0 77.3 91.9 98.0 102.1 81.7 118.1 98.0
  • http://www.fcc.gov/ib/sand/mniab/traffic/files05/CREPOR05.pdf
    • 0.077.110.5 12.0 Iceland $3,001,848 3.9 0.024.722.6 48.8 $286,192 0.0 0.018.622.4 59.0 $633 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0100.0 32,771,878 2.5 0.027.525.0 45.0 Ireland $44,072,784 6.6 0.122.225.5 45.6 $5,536,092 2.9 0.029.814.8 52.5 $4,134,615 99.9 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 477,165,748 6.8 0.121.923.9 47.4 Italy $132,786,542 2.8 0.031.114.3 51.7 $8,640,532 0.8 0.037.519.9 41.8 $12,753,395 99.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.3 1,258,138,243 2.7 0.032.316.3 48.7 Liechtenstein $2,777,434 0.5 2.625.513.6 57.9 $6,265 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0100.0 $710 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0100.0 5,929,750 1.0 3.128.124.7 43.1 Luxembourg $3,483,601 0.8 0.020.919.6 58.7 $164,671 0.6 0.023.119.8 56.5 $57,897 98.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.6 35,632,116 1.6 0.012.232.8 53.4 Malta $1,010,356 6.0 0.5 9.621.9 62.0 $93,865 0.0 0.0 0.017.4 82.6 $430 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 99.8 8,175,730 4.4 0.2 6.232.5 56.6 Netherlands $46,126,097 1.4
  • http://www.fcc.gov/ib/sand/mniab/traffic/files06/CREPOR06.PDF
    • 0.0 0.0 0.0100.0 5,334,174 0.7 5.6 2.944.6 46.3 Netherlands $50,465,900 0.019.5 0.4 9.8 70.4 $6,645,802 0.0 0.1 0.064.5 35.4 $4,624,161 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 99.9 580,189,179 0.013.7 0.339.9 46.2 Norway $13,490,830 0.025.0 0.318.1 56.6 $836,925 0.023.9 0.019.3 56.9 $2,538,915 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0100.0 164,594,720 0.019.5 0.630.2 49.8 Portugal $16,390,237 0.015.4 1.424.4 58.7 $1,499,178 0.010.9 0.024.9 64.2 $692,194 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.5 99.5 275,602,651 0.018.1 2.422.4 57.1 Spain $55,695,353 0.128.2 0.712.2 58.9 $4,208,125 0.014.1 0.020.9 65.0 $24,494,336 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0100.0 649,185,545 0.119.9 4.717.8 57.5 Sweden $19,945,001 0.324.5 0.229.9 45.0 $3,851,564 0.028.7 0.023.3 48.0 $9,489,951 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0100.0 429,598,237 0.016.9 0.341.1 41.6 Switzerland $38,491,663 0.044.5 0.314.7 40.5 $2,596,506 0.018.0 0.030.8 51.2 $9,265,495 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0100.0 414,079,134 0.022.7 1.234.3 41.8 Turkey
  • http://www.fcc.gov/ib/sand/mniab/traffic/files07/CREPOR07.PDF
    • 0.0 0.0100.0 2,445,845,781 0.0 16.7 0.9 30.2 52.3 Gibraltar $246,365 0.0 6.3 0.0 27.0 66.7 $4,802 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0100.0 $5,726 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0100.0 4,826,028 0.0 2.2 0.0 23.9 74.0 Greece $21,416,006 0.0 17.0 2.0 25.4 55.7 $1,370,124 0.0 20.5 0.0 41.3 38.2 $2,979,742 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0100.0 273,428,849 0.0 10.8 5.5 43.2 40.5 Greenland $218,157 0.0 11.5 0.0 0.5 87.9 $567 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0100.0 $145 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0100.0 495,096 0.0 9.2 0.0 0.6 90.1 Iceland $1,967,657 0.0 7.2 0.2 33.3 59.3 $124,077 0.0 40.9 0.0 35.1 24.0 $1,755 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0100.0 19,962,562 0.0 14.8 0.0 43.2 42.0 Ireland $32,519,820 0.0 30.1 0.6 17.3 52.0 $4,074,912 0.0 34.8 0.0 24.7 40.5 $3,931,159 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0100.0 486,605,258
  • http://www.fcc.gov/ib/sand/mniab/traffic/files08/CREPOR08.PDF
    • 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0100.0 $60 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0100.0 688,664 0.0 0.1 1.6 19.6 78.8 Austria $16,329,911 0.0 0.0 1.1 31.8 67.2 $1,825,474 0.0 0.0 0.0 39.9 60.1 $840,463 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0100.0 205,911,383 0.0 0.0 3.7 38.4 57.9 Belgium $21,202,971 0.0 0.1 1.1 10.2 88.6 $2,150,480 0.0 0.0 0.0 32.4 67.6 $19,473,691 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0100.0 418,020,278 0.0 0.0 0.5 29.5 70.0 Cyprus $1,881,304 0.0 0.0 0.9 12.0 87.0 $104,905 0.0 0.0 0.0 50.9 49.1 $124,472 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0100.0 34,647,850 0.0 0.1 2.4 24.9 72.7 Denmark $11,136,682 0.0 0.0 0.9 26.6 72.5 $614,610 0.0 0.0 0.0 24.9 75.1 $4,535,307 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0100.0 155,622,123 0.0 0.0 1.9 43.8 54.2 Finland $5,603,208 0.0 0.1 1.7 24.5 73.7 $112,233 0.0 0.0
  • http://www.fcc.gov/mb/audio/bickel/findvalues.html
    • log[10] ((mV/m) * 1000.) The factor of 1000 is used to convert millivolts per meter to microvolts per meter. CAPTION: Common FCC-Defined Equivalent dBu and mV/m Values dBu (dB above 1 microvolt per meter (uV)) mV/m (millivolts per meter electric field strength) 100 dBu 100 mV/m 80 dBu 10 mV/m 70 dBu 3.16 mV/m 60 dBu 1.0 mV/m 54 dBu 0.5 mV/m 40 dBu 0.1 mV/m 34 dBu 0.05 mV/m 28 dBu 0.025 mV/m Note: Higher field strength values are found closer to a transmitter site. For FM and TV field strengths and distances, use the [30]propagation curves program. Power kW (kilowatts) to / from dBk (dB kilowatts) Enter power in kilowatts or dBk: ______ (_) kW (_) dBk [BUTTON] Result:
  • http://www.fcc.gov/mb/audio/spacing/canada.html
    • may be sought to operate at a distance less than those separations specified below (except I.F. channel spacings). Such requests will require a showing of the locations of any predicted interference with the pertinent Canadian stations being assumed at the maximum facilities permitted for the station class, and assuming that the Canadian station's protected service contour is the 54 dBu (0.5 mV/m) F(50,50) contour. A petition for rulemaking or application which is short-spaced to a Canadian station will be most likely to succeed where (1) no interference to reception of the Canadian station will occur over Canadian soil, and (2) no interference is received from the Canadian station within the protected service contour of the U.S. station. Such applications or petitions
  • http://www.fcc.gov/mb/audio/spacing/mexico.html
    • the protected contours of the stations involved, with the pertinent Mexican stations being assumed at the maximum facilities permitted for the station class, and assuming that the Mexican station's protected service contour is the 60 dBu (1.0 mV/m) F(50,50) contour for Class A, AA, C1, and C stations; the 57 dBu (0.7 mV/m) for Class B1 stations; and 54 dBu (0.5 mV/m) for Class B stations. Such applications or petitions for rulemaking will require additional processing time while concurrence from Mexico is sought. Minimum Distance Separation Requirements in Kilometers NOTE: Class A in the following table assumes maximum facilities of 3.0 kW ERP at 100 meters HAAT, or the equivalent. See text above. Relation Co-Channel (Same Frequency) 200 kHz (First-Adjacent Channel)
  • http://www.fcc.gov/mb/peer_review/prrespstudy4.pdf
    • 324 512 0 11,400 News + Public Affairs Minutes 2,632 2,122 0 11,520 NewsMinHUTWgteda 794 655 0 2,762 PubAffMinHUTWgteda 105 187 0 4,183 Number of Shows 450 75 14 699 Number of News Shows 53 48 0 254 Number of Public Affairs Shows 9 11 0 120 TotPop1000s 2,318.4 3,370.9 9.8 20,687.4 PopPercentBlack 11.2 10.8 0.3 63.1 PopPercentHisp 11.1 14.7 0.5 94.5 DMAPerCapitaIncome 29,680 5,339 14,882 49,582 UnrelatedStationsinDMACount 9.64 5.62 0 26 422 UnrelatedStationsinDMANewsMin 20,784 11,821 0 71,787 UnrelatedStationsinDMAPubAffMin 3,053 2,736 0 17,064 UnrelatedStationsinDMANewsPAMin 23,755 13,525 0 74,799 ParentRevenueMillions 296 518 0 2330 ParentStationsCount 16.27 15.99 1 61 935 OtherCoOwnedStationsinDMACount 0.52 0.82 0 5 145 OtherCoOwnStationsinDMANewsMin 1,165 2,590 0 18,585 OtherCoOwnStationsinDMAPubAffMin 174 462 0 4,320 OtherCoOwnStationsinDMANews&PubAffMin 1,335 2,778 0 18,894 Values
  • http://www.fcc.gov/oet/info/documents/reports/SHVERA/SHVERA-FCC-05-199.pdf
    • to compensate for the multipath. H&E states that a receiver's adaptive equalizer, in attempting to compensate for the multipath will increase the system's noise level at the frequencies of compensation. H&E submits that at a good receiver location with little multipath, the adaptive equalizer tap energy might be about -10 dB, corresponding to a white noise penalty of less than 0.5 dB and that at a poor 119 MSTV comments, Att. (Engineering Statement of dLR) at 8 and n.3 (citing Bouchard, Pierre, et al., "Digital Television Test Results ­ Phase I," Communications Research Centre (Ottawa, Canada), CRC Report No. CRC- RP-2000-11, November 2000). 120 The worst performing receiver in the Bouchard study was the oldest measured unit. 121 MSTV comments, Att.
  • http://www.fcc.gov/oet/info/peerreview/docs/SHVERA-peer-review-memo.doc
    • to compensate for the multipath. H&E states that a receiver's adaptive equalizer, in attempting to compensate for the multipath will increase the system's noise level at the frequencies of compensation. H&E submits that at a good receiver location with little multipath, the adaptive equalizer tap energy might be about -10 dB, corresponding to a white noise penalty of less than 0.5 dB and that at a poor location the white noise penalty may exceed 2 dB. H&E further states that laboratory tests by others showed that receiver sensitivity decreased on the order of 0-5.3 dB in the presence of multipath. Other commenting parties generally observe that in the early stages of the DTV transition, multipath was found to be much more
  • http://www.fcc.gov/ogc/documents/opinions/1999/usta.html http://www.fcc.gov/ogc/documents/opinions/1999/usta.wp
    • reasons given for choosing 6.0% holds water. A. Devaluation of 1986-95 and 1991-95 averages First, in choosing a point within the range of reasonableness, the FCC determined that it was "reasonable to place less weight" on two lowest averages, the ones for 1986-95 and 1991-95. It said that the first, 1986-95, "is heavily influenced by the improbably low 1986 estimate of-0.5 percent." Id. at 16,697, 139. But the Commission gave no reason for condemning the 1986 estimate as "improbable," and mere divergence from the other numbers does not justify such a conclusion. See Thomas H. Wonnacott & Ronald J. Wonnacott, Introductory Statistics for Business and Economics 497 (2d ed. 1977). The FCC invokes our cases upholding the elimination of outlying data
  • http://www.fcc.gov/ownership/materials/already-released/assymetric090002.pdf
    • benefits. Therestofthepaperisorganizedasfollows.First,weextendRaskovich's (2000)modelandshowthatundermoregeneralassumptionsanequilib- riumstillexists.Next,weshowthattheintroductionofasymmetricbar- gainingpowercanimprovethebuyingfirm'sbargainingposition(evenif thefirmispivotal).Wealsoshowthatinthepresenceofasymmetric bargainingpowerthe`curvaturetest'ofthevaluefunctioncanbeamis- leadingindicatoroftheeffectsofmergeronbargainingposition,i.e.,that thebargainingpositionofthemergedfirmcanimproveevenifthethe valuefunctionisconvex.Finally,wemakesomeconcludingremarks. NashEquilibriumwithBargainingPower Inthissection,weextendRaskovich's(2000)modeltoaccommodateasym- metricbargainingpower.Webeginbyconstructingthetransferprices facedbypivotalandnon-pivotalbuyersandthenshowthatanequilib- riumexistsunderconditionsmoregeneralthanRaskovich's. FollowingRaskovich(2000),weassumetheithbuyer'ssurplusisgiven byvi=(qi,q-i),whilethesupplier'sgrosssurplusequalsV(Q),where Q= ni=1qi.Specifically,V(Q)=A(Q)-C(Q),whereA(Q) ancillary revenue,andC(Q) totalcost.Thesupplierwillproduceiff: V(Q)+ n i=1 Ti 0 (1) 3ForRaskovich(2000), 1= 2= n=12.Infact,Raskovich'spivotalresultwillholdforanyconstantvalue = 1= 2=... nwhere (0,1).Notethat irepresentstheshareofsurpluskeptbybuyeri. 3 Wealsonotethat: q i=argmax x[vi(x,q-i)+V(Q-i+x)] (2) whereweassumethereexistsaq tthatmaximizesjointsurplus.4Buyeri ispivotaliff: V(Q-i)+ j =i Tj<0 (3) and max x[vi(x,q-i)+V(Q-i+x)]+ j =i Tj 0 (4) wherevi(0,q-i)=0.5 Thetransferprice(incorporatingasymmetricbargainingpowerand using notation)becomes,foranon-pivotalbuyer,Ti=(vi+(V-V-i))(1- i)-(V-V-i)whichcanbewrittenas: Ti=vi(1- i)- i(V-V-i) (5) Next,notingthat j =iTj+V-i<0,weseethatthetransferpricefora pivotalbuyercanbewrittenasTi=[vi+( j =iTj+V)](1- i)-V- j =iTj,oras: Ti=vi(1- i)- i( j =i Tj+V) (6) Definition1:ANashEquilibriuminpurchasedquantities(q 1,q 2,...,q n) andtransferprices(T1,...,Tn)isthatforwhichthefollowingholdsimul- taneouslyforalli: q i=argmax x(vi(x,q -i)+V( j =i q j+x)) (7) Ti=vi(x,q -i)(1- i)- i(V(Q )-V(Q -q i)) (8) if j =iTj+V(Q -q i) 0 Ti=vi(x,q -i)(1- i)- i( j =i Tj+V(Q
  • http://www.fcc.gov/ownership/materials/already-released/review090001.pdf
    • the most weight, data from markets 99 and 101 get the next most weight, and so forth. The particular smoothing method employed is called "loess" and is described in William S. Cleveland, The Elements of Graphing Data (Hobart Press, 1994). The specific implementation is from the "loess" command in the statistical package "S-PLUS 2000", with the smoothing parameter set to 0.5. 12 For the current year, March 2001, the Metro market revenue is equated to the sum of the station revenue for stations assigned ("home") to their Metro market. In previous years, Metro market revenue was used. In some cases the differences between these measures of market revenue were the result of out-of-Metro market stations that earned a share of the
  • http://www.fcc.gov/ownership/materials/already-released/survivor090002.pdf
    • Total Broadcast Advertising Volume Total Cable Advertising Volume National Video Advertising Volume Broadcast Network Advertising Volume National Spot Advertising Volume Syndicatio n Advertising Volume Cable Network Advertising Volume Local Video Advertising Volume Local Spot Advertising Volume Local Cable Advertising Volume 1975 100.0 100.0 0.0 74.7 43.8 30.8 0.0 0.0 25.3 25.3 0.0 1980 100.0 99.4 0.6 74.1 44.7 28.5 0.4 0.5 25.9 25.8 0.1 1985 100.0 95.4 4.6 72.2 37.9 28.2 2.4 3.7 27.8 26.8 0.9 1990 100.0 91.0 9.0 71.1 33.9 26.5 3.8 6.8 28.9 26.8 2.2 1991 100.0 89.0 11.0 71.0 33.3 24.9 4.4 8.4 29.0 26.4 2.6 1992 100.0 87.7 12.3 70.7 33.0 24.3 4.4 9.0 29.3 26.0 3.3 1993 100.0 86.3 13.7 70.5 31.4 24.0 4.9 10.1
  • http://www.fcc.gov/ownership/roundtable_docs/waldfogel-b.pdf
    • residential segregation in the 15 Northern cities with the largest black populations in 1980 was 80.1 (Massey and Denton, 1993, p. 64). Alternatively, let = Min(sbj, swj)/Max(sbj, swj), where sbj is the percent of all black listeners listening to format j and similarly for whites. There are only two formats, News and Soft Adult Contemporary, for which is greater than 0.5. 19 Table 5 reports listening data, by format and age and gender.17 These data reveal substantial differences in preferences across age groups, both in formats, and number of formats, chosen. Teenaged (12-17) listening is heavily concentrated in three formats, top 40 (37.6 percent), Black (19.3 percent), and Album Oriented Rock (11.5 percent). Teenagers listen to 4.8 format equivalents, fewer than
  • http://www.fcc.gov/ownership/roundtable_docs/waldfogel-c.pdf
    • 3.4 AC/Contemp. Hit Radio 2.1 2.9 0.8 2.3 2.9 1.5 Adult Contemp./New Rock 0.6 1.1 0.3 1.1 1.5 0.6 AC/Soft Adult Contemp. 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 Album Oriented Rock (AOR) 5.3 6.0 0.7 4.5 4.9 2.4 AOR/Adult Contemp. 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.0 AOR/Classic Rock 0.2 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 Album Oriented Rock/New Rock 3.0 3.7 0.5 3.1 3.3 1.9 Album Oriented Rock/Progressive 1.0 1.3 0.1 1.8 1.6 0.6 Black 7.5 1.7 32.5 1.6 4.0 1.6 Black/Adult Contemp. 3.2 0.8 18.3 1.4 4.6 1.7 Black/Gospel 1.2 0.0 1.8 0.1 0.0 0.0 Black/Oldies 1.0 0.1 2.4 0.3 0.5 0.0 Black/Talk 0.2 0.0 1.4 0.3 0.4 0.0 Big Band/Nostalgia 4.7 4.2 0.5 4.2 4.1 1.2 Big Band/Nostalgia/Religious 0.0 0.0
  • http://www.fcc.gov/ownership/workshop-110209/wildman.pdf
    • news does not equate to offering local news 10 Number of local news items by medium 11 % allocation of local news items by type Type of news Daily NP Weekly NP TV Stns News Talk Radio StnsOther Radio Stations City gov't 24.0 20.6 16.4 19.4 19.4 County gov't 2.8 2.5 3.9 5.4 5.4 Reg. gov't 0.8 0.1 0.3 1.0 0.5 Education 7.8 10.7 4.5 5.4 4.3 Crime/Courts 23.2 8.2 31.1 28.1 26.3 Accidents/Disasters 5.6 1.0 11.6 9.7 11.8 Human/Community interest 16.3 41.3 12.7 14.0 11.3 Business/Economy 17.0 14.4 16.7 15.7 17.2 All else 2.6 1.1 2.7 1.3 3.8 Total 100 100 100 100 100 12 News Outlets vsOutlets with Local News TV Stations News Outlets vsOutlets with Local News Radio
  • http://www.fcc.gov/pshs/docs-best/imel-wireless03.pdf
    • Relay Mobiles, low power base and handheld radios transmit on frequency f2. The signals are detected by the repeater and remodulate a transmitter on f1 at the mobile relay site. Base Part 2 -68- Repeater Innovations Repeater stations are usually high-power stations, 600 to 3,500 watts ERP, and cover a large area. Handheld radios, with their low output power of 0.5 to 3 watts ERP, are often unable to be heard at the repeater site, particularly in hilly or mountainous terrain or in urban areas having numerous tall buildings. To correct this power imbalance, one or more satellite receiving sites may be set up in these coverage areas close to the low-power radios to receive the low-power signals. Each satellite receiver's
  • http://www.fcc.gov/pshs/docs/clearinghouse/case-studies/Hurricane-Ike-Harris%20County-120109.pdf
    • Appendix A proves that larger sites with a higher number of channels can bear higher system utilization than that of smaller sites. Figure 31 - Operation Region provides the operational status for all of the RRS's LMR sites during peak usage in the month of September. The solid curve represents a GoS defined as 2% of calls experiencing delays exceeding 0.5 call duration, (I.e. four seconds assuming call duration of eight seconds). Under this scenario, only 10 of the 24 sites met the GoS objective and fell within the green area, while 14 of the 24 sites did not meet the GoS objective and fell within the red area. Percent Busy at Site Highest Utilization Hour 0% 10% 20% 30% 40%
  • http://www.fcc.gov/pshs/docs/clearinghouse/references/cert-frs-gmrs-faq.doc
    • be a requirement to use a GMRS call sign on FRS 1-7 IF the 22 channel radio you own uses more than the FRS legal power of one-half watt on those channels. An FRS-ONLY radio requires NO FCC license. "But our university CERT program leaders wrote in our radio instructions the following, "Since only channels 8-14 have transmission power of 0.5 watts, we will limit our use to those channels. The other channels on the radio have 1 watt of transmission power, which requires a license from the Federal Communications Commission for use. They will not be used except in exceptional cases, as described under Channel Allocation. Channel 7, Subcode 53 This is a 1 watt channel, which will not be
  • http://www.fcc.gov/pshs/docs/clearinghouse/references/minneapolis-bridge-report.pdf
    • single resource being in continuous use, or two channels being at fifty percent use, and so on.59 For example, if an office had two telephone operators, two simultaneous users, who are both busy all the time, that would represent two Erlangs of traffic, or a radio channel that is occupied for thirty minutes during an hour is said to carry 0.5 Erlang of traffic. In turn, Channel Capacity, or an Erlang can be referenced as a simultaneous user, which occupies the continuous use of a traffic channel. Assuming 1% Grade of Service (GoS) the 30.7 Erlangs equates (using Erlang C traffic tables) to a requirement of 46 channels. 57 Loutfi Nuaymi, SIMPLE CAPACITY ESTIMATIONS IN WIMAX/802.16 SYSTEM , 2006 58 SR
  • http://www.fcc.gov/realaudio/mt120301.pdf
    • " MMAC " Bluetooth " Home RF 18 December 3, 2001 TDD ­Digital Cordless Telephones CT2/CT2+ DECT PHS Cordless Telephone 2 Digital Enhanced Cordless TelephonePersonal Handy Phone System Mobile Frequency CT2: 864/868 Range (MHz) CT2+: 944/948 Multiple Access Method Duplex Method TDD TDD TDD 10 300 (12 users/chanel) (4 users/channel) Channel Spacing 100 kHz 1.728 MHz 300 kHz GFSK GFSK (0.5 Gaussian Filter) (0.5 Gaussian Filter) Channel Bit Rate 72 kb/s 1.152 Mb/s 384 kb/s Modulation /4 DQPSK TDMA/FDM TDMA/FDM TDMA/FDM Number of Channels 40 Digital Cordless Telephones Standard 1880-1900 1895-1918 19 December 3, 2001 DECT/PHS ! TDD and TDMA ! Efficient use of spectrum and high user density ! Voice and data services supported " DECT GAP " DPRS (up
  • http://www.fcc.gov/realaudio/presentations/2003/021203/featuredetection.pdf
    • power spectral density are deterministic functions that (incompletely) describe a stochastic process Ë There exists an infinite number of stochastic processes that have the same correlation function and power spectral density Delay Frequency F Correlation Function Power Spectral Density 11 ©2003 The MITRE Corporation Second-Order Moments for Zero-Mean Wide-Sense Stationary Process (Concluded) 0 1 2 3 4 x 10-6 -1 -0.5 0 0.5 6 x 105 time Cyclic ACF tau Time Delay Spectral Frequency Correlation Function Power Spectral Density 12 ©2003 The MITRE Corporation Cyclostationary Processes I Model of actual data as stationary becomes limited as statistics vary over time I Statistics of some time series vary periodically over time- cyclostationary processes I First-order and second-order moments of cyclostationary processes Ë
  • http://www.fcc.gov/realaudio/tr062402.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/realaudio/tr062402.txt
    • women, only 25 percent were sales manager, and only ten percent were 28 Heritage Reporting Corporation (202) 628-4888 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 program directors. The average percentage of women in the upper four job categories was up by only 0.5 percent since 1995. In 2001, we saw some slight improvements. In those same radio stations in the top 100 markets, the number of women in the general manager position rose from 13 to 15 percent, sales managers went from 25 to 30 percent, and female program directors stayed the same at ten percent. While AWRT is encouraged by the slight
  • http://www.fcc.gov/transaction/aol-tw/tseng_comment051100.pdf
    • servers, network management tools, security and billing systems. The cable modem network is a shared network in that the upstream and downstream bandwidth is shared by all the homes connected to a cable network segment. One television channel of 6 MHz in the spectrum range of 50-750 MHz is usually allocated for downstream data traffic. The downstream capacity is typically 0.5-1 Mbps with a maximum downstream capacity of 27 Mbps. Another channel in the 5-42 MHz band is allocated to carry upstream signals. The upstream capacity is typically 256-500 Kbps with a maximum upstream capacity of 10 Mbps, depending on the amount of spectrum allocated for service. The cable network lends itself to fast bursts of data. Figure 3.1 below shows
  • http://www.fcc.gov/transaction/att-comcast/jtconsumer_reply060502.pdf
    • value 156 The 70 percent of the market that is not integrated but increased prices would suffer slight reduction of subscribers -- .3 percent). The combined effect (.71 percent) would still be less than the threshold values Besen calculated. 67 EXHIBIT V-4: ESTIMATED AUDIENCE LOSS FOR 10 PERCENT PRICE INCREASE, WITH PASS THROUGH TO CONSUMERS 0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 25% 33% 50% 100% OWNERSHIP IN AFFILAITED PROGRAM % OF SUBSCRIBERS LOST 30 PERCENT MARKET SHARE 60 PERCENT MARKET SHARE Cahiers/ TVInsite, Basic Cable Primetime Ratings Average, 2001, January 10, 2002 for subscribers, Besen, Stanley M. 2002. "Declaration" attached to "Application and Public Interest Statement," In the Matter of Applications for Consent to the Transfer of
  • http://www.fcc.gov/transaction/att-comcast/jtpet3petdeny042902.pdf
    • Programming, Fourth Annual Report, CS Docket No. 97-141, December 31, 1997, Appendix B; Sixth Annual Report, CS Docket No. 99-230, December 30, 1999, Appendix B; Seventh Annual Report, CS Docket No. 00-132, January 2, 2001, Appendix B; Eight Annual Report, CS Docket No. 01-129, January 14, 2002, Appendix B. 29 EXHIBIT 2: PRICE INCREASES SINCE CABLE DEREGULATION IN 1984 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 1984198519861987198819891990199119921993199419951996199719981999200020012002 INDEX (1984 = 1) CABLE ALL ITEMS Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics, Consumer Price Index. 30 EXHIBIT 3: REAL PRICE INCREASES AND MONOPOLY RENTS (TOBIN'S q) 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 1984 1992 1996 2001 INDEX (1984=1) TOBIN'S q REAL PRICES (CPI-U) Sources: Real Prices calculated from Exhibit 2; Tobin's q
  • http://www.fcc.gov/transaction/att-comcast/jtpet_petdeny042902.pdf
    • Programming, Fourth Annual Report, CS Docket No. 97-141, December 31, 1997, Appendix B; Sixth Annual Report, CS Docket No. 99-230, December 30, 1999, Appendix B; Seventh Annual Report, CS Docket No. 00-132, January 2, 2001, Appendix B; Eight Annual Report, CS Docket No. 01-129, January 14, 2002, Appendix B. 29 EXHIBIT 2: PRICE INCREASES SINCE CABLE DEREGULATION IN 1984 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 1984198519861987198819891990199119921993199419951996199719981999200020012002 INDEX (1984 = 1) CABLE ALL ITEMS Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics, Consumer Price Index. 30 EXHIBIT 3: REAL PRICE INCREASES AND MONOPOLY RENTS (TOBINíS q) 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 1984 1992 1996 2001 INDEX (1984=1) TOBIN'S q REAL PRICES (CPI-U) Sources: Real Prices calculated from Exhibit 2; Tobinís q
  • http://www.fcc.gov/transaction/att-comcast/oppwp35.pdf
    • The average buyer bargaining power is simply the average of these ìaverages.î Figures 3 - 5 show the average buyerís bargaining power for the last four trading periods for each concentration treatment. 1 2 3 4 DBS UNCAP noMFN MFN 0.58 0.57 0.59 0.56 0.63 0.50 0.41 0.42 0.43 0.54 0.30 0.29 0.32 0.39 0.18 0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 Buyer Figure 3: Average Buyer Bargaining Power (Periods 5-8) Low/High Concentration Treatment Treatment 30 1 2 3 4 DBS UNCAP noMFN MFN 0.57 0.55 0.56 0.54 0.69 0.42 0.36 0.47 0.37 0.47 0.33 0.31 0.31 0.37 0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 Buyer Figure 4: Average Buyer Bargaining Power (Periods 5-8) High/High Concentration Treatment 1 2
  • http://www.fcc.gov/transaction/echostar-directv/genmot2_reply022502.pdf
    • App. C, Table 1 (data for satellite and fixed wireless services, which was aggregated by the Commission due to confidentiality concerns, reflect that such services accounted for 194,707 of the nation's 9,616,341 high speed lines). 215 As a percentage of homes with Internet service, the figure for satellite service is even smaller. The NTIA's most recent study reflected that only 0.5 percent of all Internet homes utilized high-speed services other than cable and DSL, while 12.9 percent of such homes used cable modem, and 6.6 percent used DSL. See U.S. Department of Commerce, National Telecommunications and Information Administration and Economics and Statistics Administration, A Nation Online: How Americans Are Expanding Their Use of the Internet (Feb. 3, 2002), at 39 (reporting
  • http://www.fcc.gov/transaction/echostar-directv/nab4_petition020402.pdf
    • relevant product market are close substitutes-that is, when the price of one product increases, there is an equal diversion to the other products in the market. Because consumers perceive DirecTV and EchoStar to be closer substitutes to each other than to cable, I also estimate the post-merger increase in price using a higher cross-price elasticity for DirecTV and EchoStar of 0.5. Using that higher cross-price elasticity, I estimate that, following the proposed merger, the prices for the EchoStar and DirecTV offerings would increase by 7.3 percent and 3.5 percent, respectively. 3. The Consumer Welfare Loss Resulting from the Proposed Merger 49. The proposed merger would increase the price of DBS service in areas not passed by cable television systems and also
  • http://www.fcc.gov/transaction/echostar-directv/national_ehxo.pdf
    • center (110 WL) location, but could have picked 101 or 119 WL with similar results being expected. There are other ways available using the outer (61.5 and/or 148 WL) slots, but we did not investigate these opportunities. The methodology consisted of manually plotting the DMAs unserved by the DirecTV and EchoStar satellites on a map. A series of approximately 50 0.5-degree spot beams were then placed over these DMAs. Each spot has access to only one of the three new frequencies. The number of STVs for each covered DMA was also indicated. At a 12:1 compression ration, the maximum number of STVs was 12 per beam. In theory, there is enough capacity for about 600 stations, but realities of population and
  • http://www.fcc.gov/transaction/echostar-directv/nrtc3_petdismiss052002.pdf
    • center (110 WL) location, but could have picked 101 or 119 WL with similar results being expected. There are other ways available using the outer (61.5 and/or 148 WL) slots, but we did not investigate these opportunities. The methodology consisted of manually plotting the DMAs unserved by the DirecTV and EchoStar satellites on a map. A series of approximately 50 0.5-degree spot beams were then placed over these DMAs. Each spot has access to only one of the three new frequencies. The number of STVs for each covered DMA was also indicated. At a 12:1 compression ration, the maximum number of STVs was 12 per beam. In theory, there is enough capacity for about 600 stations, but realities of population and
  • http://www.fcc.gov/transaction/echostar-directv/nrtc_exhibit1.pdf
    • markets. To illustrate the possible bias, denote DirecTV as firm 1, EchoStar as firm 2. Suppose p2 = p1 + v, where v is a normal random error with zero mean and a standard deviation of 0.044 (approximately the standard deviation of p1). Let the "true" price p in the market be the average of p1 and p2: p = 0.5 (p1 + p2) generating the random error v in a simulation run 1000 times. For each random draw of v, I generate first price p2 and then p according to these two equations. The coefficient b in the OLS regression is then estimated for each random draw, and the average of the estimated b over the 1000 draws is ­1.25,
  • http://www.fcc.gov/wcb/armis/documents/aad_92_42_moorder_da_93_765.pdf
    • c .~ "0 ocaa) "+:"iij~:J t/) a) .a '- t/) ~ ca t/) ~~a) ~-~U C 0 a) a)- ~'-a. :c5E.sUa) ~ - --0 M ~0) CO 0- m )( :0 c !.Q. -< -N- N -C~ ~ '0 G -; "30 .. ~ ~ c- O G c.o '01i 0'O.c G U) -; ~-0 5,~~ 0 :§i.oG .c~ So '0.5 G U) U) ~ ~'OU) ~ oc c 0 :o"-E =0~ 0. mOo .~ '0'0~ C C ~ .gIU) U) G U)-~'O >-~ :u~G B .=~'00. ~ U) ~ ~ ~ 0 U) 0 G~ ~";'0 E ~ C -c~ ~ c -; 0 -'0 ~ ~ oU)~ ~ ~.o0 U) Co~ 0 0 0. 'O~ ~ 8~ c00 ~
  • http://www.fcc.gov/wcb/ppd/depreciation/documents/fcc00306.pdf
    • 2411 POLES 13.6 -70 49.2 8.9 2421 AERIAL CABLE METALLIC 10.3 -35 50.6 8.2 2421 AERIAL CABLE NONMETAL 14.9 -20 45.2 5.0 2422 UG CABLE METALLIC 13.7 -30 49.3 5.9 2422 UG CABLE NONMETAL 14.7 -20 43.5 5.2 2423 BURIED CABLE METALLIC 11.4 -10 45.5 5.7 2423 BURIED CABLE NONMETAL 14.9 -10 39.9 4.7 2424 SUBMARINE CABLE 11.7 -1 94.7 0.5 2425 DEEP SEA CABLE 18.6 -10 35.5 4.0 2426 INTRABUILDING CABLE 9.2 -10 61.5 5.3 2431 AERIAL WIRE 5.5 -31 85.1 8.3 2441 CONDUIT SYSTEMS 34.0 -10 18.3 2.7 The figures in Columns B, C, and D are percentages of gross book cost. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION APPENDIX Schedule of Annual Percentages of Depreciation for PAGE 2 VERIZON NORTHWEST INC. -
  • http://www.fcc.gov/wcb/tapd/universal_service/JointBoard/020220_jointboard_enbanc/Garnett_Slides.pdf
    • fell from 38% to 35%, ­Cable modem's share fell from 56% to 44%. ­Mobile wireless'share of total broadband lines rose from 1% to 17% of total broadband lines. ­The share of "other"forms of broadband (including fixed wireless, satellite, fiber, and broadband over power line) remained at 4% of total broadband lines ­although their total line count grew 39%. 3.1 2.0 0.5 7.9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Millio ns ADSL Cable Modem Other BroadbandWireless Sources: FCC Report on "High-Speed Services for Internet Access," Jan. 2007. High Speed Net Adds by Type, Dec. 2005 ­June 2006 7 Wireline CETC Support ILEC Support Wireless ETC Support $20,939,911,241 $1,115,001,219 $52,654,862 Source: USAC Data 94.7 % of all High Cost Support
  • https://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/prod/cdbs/forms/prod/faq_exhibits.htm
    • first column containing depression angle values and second (and subsequent, when applicable) column(s) containing relative field values. When applicable, the first row shall list the azimuth angle being tabulated. The range of depression angles shall be 10 degrees above horizontal (-10 degrees depression) to 90 degrees below horizontal (90 degrees depression) and shall include data points spaced not more than 0.5-degree between -5 and 10 degrees depression angle, and not more than 5 degrees elsewhere. All pattern minima and maxima shall be included. Additional elevation antenna (or radiation) pattern data may be included following the column corresponding to 350 degrees TN so that the direction(s) of maximum and minimum radiation are provided. A relative field value of 1 shall correspond to
  • https://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/prod/cdbs/forms/prod/faq_informal.htm
    • required information and choose a purpose of "Analog Termination Information Update". Note: If you need to file another Update form, specify the previous one and use "Copy Form" again. Q. OMB Number/Paperwork Reduction Act information for Informal Forms. FCC NOTICE REQUIRED BY THE PAPERWORK REDUCTION ACT We have estimated that each response to this collection of information will take from 0.5 to 5 hours. Our estimate includes the time to read the instructions, look through existing records, gather and maintain the required data, and actually complete and review the form or response. If you have any comments on this burden estimate, or on how we can improve the collection and reduce the burden it causes you, please e-mail them to pra@fcc.gov
  • https://licensing.fcc.gov/prod/cdbs/forms/prod/faq_exhibits.htm
    • first column containing depression angle values and second (and subsequent, when applicable) column(s) containing relative field values. When applicable, the first row shall list the azimuth angle being tabulated. The range of depression angles shall be 10 degrees above horizontal (-10 degrees depression) to 90 degrees below horizontal (90 degrees depression) and shall include data points spaced not more than 0.5-degree between -5 and 10 degrees depression angle, and not more than 5 degrees elsewhere. All pattern minima and maxima shall be included. Additional elevation antenna (or radiation) pattern data may be included following the column corresponding to 350 degrees TN so that the direction(s) of maximum and minimum radiation are provided. A relative field value of 1 shall correspond to
  • https://licensing.fcc.gov/prod/cdbs/forms/prod/faq_informal.htm
    • A confirmation screen will be displayed when the form is submitted successfully. Q. OMB Number/Paperwork Reduction Act information for Informal Forms. The following notice applies to CDBS informal filings unless they have their own Paperwork Reduction Act notice. FCC NOTICE REQUIRED BY THE PAPERWORK REDUCTION ACT We have estimated that each response to this collection of information will take from 0.5 to 5 hours. Our estimate includes the time to read the instructions, look through existing records, gather and maintain the required data, and actually complete and review the form or response. If you have any comments on this burden estimate, or on how we can improve the collection and reduce the burden it causes you, please e-mail them to pra@fcc.gov