FCC Web Documents citing 0.405
- http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3470A6.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3470A6.txt
- 3.411 (0.64) 0.761 (0.63) 0.000357* (2.05) 0.740 251 Format 20 HHI -0.200* (3.64) -0.004* (7.54) -0.217 (-1.79) 0.031 (1.14) -0.000007 (-1.69) 0.404 251 Format 11 Count -0.354 (0.23) 0.103* (7.60) 1.026 (0.30) -0.008 (-0.01) 0.000201 (1.80) 0.607 251 Format 11 HHI -0.173* (3.09) -0.003* (6.90) -0.221 (-1.79) 0.003 (0.09) -0.000003 (-0.73) 0.361 251 With Demographics: Format 101 Count 3.399 (1.00) 0.405* (13.68) 0.920 (0.13) 1.526 (0.93) 0.000426 (1.73) 0.892 244 Format 101 HHI -0.109* (2.51) -0.003* (7.03) -0.037 (-0.40) 0.002 (0.11) -0.000006 (-1.91) 0.582 244 Format 20 Count 4.374 (1.70) 0.208* (9.31) 1.894 (0.35) 0.369 (0.30) 0.000159 (0.85) 0.751 244 Format 20 HHI -0.200* (3.61) -0.003* (6.61) -0.129 (-1.10) 0.022 (0.81) -0.000007 (-1.62) 0.491 244 Format 11 Count -0.212 (0.13) 0.090*
- http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-732A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-732A2.txt
- 8.263 8.652 5.453 5.37 5.366 137.189 141.884 143.466 114.907 123.301 130.271 16.199 16.863 18.351 5,431.995,828.606,236.55 3,982.073,969.204,438.59 975.047 684.989 847.84 0.973 0.925 0.893 3.553 3.697 3.698 0.865 0.876 0.873 41.579 45.601 50.296 116.145 114.666 111.191 0.501 0.537 0.566 91.363 92.174 103.861 34.522 36.494 38.549 0.263 0.273 0.267 761.912 780.39 797.844 0.351 0.343 0.353 0.289 0.238 0.276 16.179 16.677 17.658 3,478.123,297.093,423.65 0.415 0.405 0.392 907.599 962.412 996.621 4.306 4.565 4.72 0.564 0.552 0.576 1.29 0.874 1.025 1.734 1.655 1.672 0.979 0.966 1.008 20.935 20.799 21.197 798.101 856.786 925.016 51.513 55.335 58.597 1.918 1.774 1.848 8.621 8.835 8.754 259.342 266.149 273.178 0.579 0.588 0.6 135.172 126.098 157.416 16.587 16.476 16.582 7.852 8.102 8.377 5.863 5.936 6.54 635.21 640.938 749.263 0.446 0.452 0.45 5.017 5.063
- http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-2A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-2A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-2A1.txt
- (843) (444) (528) 2007 0.258 0.312 * 0.337 * (629) (417) (671) Contour/Market Measure 2005 0.288 0.349 * 0.359 * (1081) (453) (281) 2007 0.263 0.329 * 0.345 * (824) (438) (455) Market Rank 101 - 200 Market Measure 2005 0.463 0.396 * 0.379 * (410) (313) (444) 2007 0.398 0.426 0.348 * (353) (277) (553) Contour Measure 2005 0.317 0.405 * 0.514 * (409) (340) (418) 2007 0.290 0.361 * 0.463 * (374) (317) (492) Contour/Market Measure 2005 0.374 0.423 * 0.496 * (601) (324) (242) 2007 0.328 0.402 * 0.450 * (535) (331) (317) Market Rank > 200 Market Measure 2005 0.509 0.515 0.484 (415) (279) (231) 2007 0.508 0.475 0.470 (314) (325) (311) Contour Measure 2005 0.438 0.497
- http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-194A1.doc
- 4-6 (arguing in favor of validity of §§ 51.701(b), 51.703, 51.709(b), 51.711(a), 51.715(d), and 51.717 of the Commission's rules); see also Reply Brief of the Mid-sized Local Exchange Carriers, filed January 6, 1997, in No. 96-3321, Iowa Utils. Bd. v. FCC, at 34 (arguing against LEC-CMRS interconnection regime adopted in the Local Competition Order). 1B J. Moore, Federal Practice ¶ 0.405[1], pp. 622-24 (2d ed. 1974)(quoted in Parklane Hosiery Co. v. Shore, 439 U.S. 322, 327 (1979)). Id. 439 U.S. 322 (1979). Parklane Hosiery Co. v. Shore, 439 U.S. at 331. Yamaha Corp. v. U.S., 961 F.2d 245, 254 (D.C. Cir. 1992). See Securities Indus. Ass'n v. Board of Governors, 900 F.2d 360, 364 (D.C. Cir. 1990). American Iron & Steel
- http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-105A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-105A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-105A1.txt
- Supplemental Reply Brief of Verizon Virginia Inc. and Verizon South Inc., File Nos. EB-00-MD-19, -20 (filed June 6, 2001) (``Verizon Supplemental Reply Brief'') at 2. We need not decide whether Virginia law or federal law controls, because federal law similarly requires that an issue actually be litigated for collateral estoppel to apply. See, e.g., 1B J. Moore, Federal Practice ¶ 0.405[1], pp. 622-24 (2d ed. 1974) (quoted in Parklane Hosiery Co. v. Shore, 439 U.S. 322, 327 (1979)). Preemption Order, 15 FCC Rcd at 11281, ¶ 9 (emphasis added). Starpower-Verizon South Joint Statement at 3, ¶ 10. Starpower-Verizon South Joint Statement at 3, ¶ 11. The parties agree that Verizon South's General Customer Services Tariff is the tariff to which the
- http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2002/FCC-02-105A1.html
- Supplemental Reply Brief of Verizon Virginia Inc. and Verizon South Inc., File Nos. EB-00-MD- 19, -20 (filed June 6, 2001) (``Verizon Supplemental Reply Brief'') at 2. We need not decide whether Virginia law or federal law controls, because federal law similarly requires that an issue actually be litigated for collateral estoppel to apply. See, e.g., 1B J. Moore, Federal Practice 0.405[1], pp. 622-24 (2d ed. 1974) (quoted in Parklane Hosiery Co. v. Shore, 439 U.S. 322, 327 (1979)). 132 Preemption Order, 15 FCC Rcd at 11281, 9 (emphasis added). 133 Starpower-Verizon South Joint Statement at 3, 10. 134 Starpower-Verizon South Joint Statement at 3, 11. 135 The parties agree that Verizon South's General Customer Services Tariff is the tariff to which
- http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr04-3.pdf
- R CENTURYTEL NW-AR-RUS CenturyTel, Inc. 49,763,823 113,820 437.22 8,858,226 0.829 401143 C R CENTURYTEL NW-AR-SIL CenturyTel, Inc. 9,533,718 22,781 418.49 1,452,952 0.136 401144 C R CENTURYTEL-CENTRAL A CenturyTel, Inc. 50,274,194 84,718 593.43 16,518,665 1.546 401144A C R CENTURYTEL-CENTRAL A CenturyTel, Inc. 417,598 1,288 324.22 3,158 0.000 401691 C R ALLTEL ARKANSAS INC ALLTEL Communications Service Corp. 41,740,546 109,505 381.17 4,322,121 0.405 401692 C R ARKANSAS TEL CO 3,063,421 8,940 342.66 129,077 0.012 401697 C R CENTRAL ARKANSAS TEL 2,715,111 3,391 800.68 1,188,280 0.111 401698 C R CLEVELAND COUNTY TEL Telephone And Data Systems, Inc. 1,884,322 3,796 496.40 463,915 0.043 401699 C R DECATUR TEL CO INC Telephone And Data Systems, Inc. 471,866 1,307 361.03 34,477 0.003 401702 C R SOUTH ARKANSAS
- http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/SOCC/01socc.pdf
- 0.3 0.4 3.0 0.008AR California 1,009.8 762.1 247.7 (40.4) 347.7 207.8 58.6 77.5 343.9 3.757CA Colorado 1,143.2 748.9 394.3 305.7 108.2 62.0 16.3 29.0 107.3 0.842CO Connecticut 141.5 20.5 121.1 98.4 96.7 40.2 30.1 26.1 96.4 0.368CT Delaware 25.7 11.2 14.5 9.0 11.2 5.8 1.5 3.9 11.2 0.030DE District of Columbia (120.5) (32.3) (88.2) (111.8) 42.8 9.0 9.8 23.6 42.4 0.405DC Florida 880.8 856.8 24.0 (28.7) 265.0 166.1 37.2 58.8 262.1 2.837FL Georgia 558.4 730.1 (171.6) (258.0) 171.7 96.2 23.1 49.1 168.5 3.256GA Hawaii 67.0 56.5 10.6 8.1 87.6 50.1 12.8 23.2 86.1 1.537HI Idaho 414.0 416.1 (2.1) (13.6) 23.1 12.7 4.6 5.7 23.0 0.125ID Illinois (1,043.9) (327.4) (716.5) (756.1) 284.2 151.4 86.5 44.4 282.2 1.982 IL Indiana 1,418.9 1,828.3 (409.4)
- http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2002/FCC-02-105A1.html
- Supplemental Reply Brief of Verizon Virginia Inc. and Verizon South Inc., File Nos. EB-00-MD- 19, -20 (filed June 6, 2001) (``Verizon Supplemental Reply Brief'') at 2. We need not decide whether Virginia law or federal law controls, because federal law similarly requires that an issue actually be litigated for collateral estoppel to apply. See, e.g., 1B J. Moore, Federal Practice 0.405[1], pp. 622-24 (2d ed. 1974) (quoted in Parklane Hosiery Co. v. Shore, 439 U.S. 322, 327 (1979)). 132 Preemption Order, 15 FCC Rcd at 11281, 9 (emphasis added). 133 Starpower-Verizon South Joint Statement at 3, 10. 134 Starpower-Verizon South Joint Statement at 3, 11. 135 The parties agree that Verizon South's General Customer Services Tariff is the tariff to which
- http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-12-2A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-12-2A1.pdf
- (843) (444) (528) 2007 0.258 0.312 * 0.337 * (629) (417) (671) Contour/Market Measure 2005 0.288 0.349 * 0.359 * (1081) (453) (281) 2007 0.263 0.329 * 0.345 * (824) (438) (455) Market Rank 101 - 200 Market Measure 2005 0.463 0.396 * 0.379 * (410) (313) (444) 2007 0.398 0.426 0.348 * (353) (277) (553) Contour Measure 2005 0.317 0.405 * 0.514 * (409) (340) (418) 2007 0.290 0.361 * 0.463 * (374) (317) (492) Contour/Market Measure 2005 0.374 0.423 * 0.496 * (601) (324) (242) 2007 0.328 0.402 * 0.450 * (535) (331) (317) Market Rank > 200 Market Measure 2005 0.509 0.515 0.484 (415) (279) (231) 2007 0.508 0.475 0.470 (314) (325) (311) Contour Measure 2005 0.438 0.497
- http://www.fcc.gov/ib/sand/agree/files/mex-bc/am.pdf
- 0.936 0.929 0.918 0.908 0.897 0.885 0.873 0.860 0.833 0.805 0.776 0.745 0.714 2:; 0:617 0.584 :*g o:488 0.457 0.427 0,397 0.369 0.341 0.316 0.289 0.265 1.000 1 .OQO 0.998 0.996 0.992 0.988 0.983 0.977 0.970 0.963 0.954 0.945 0,934 0.923 0.912 0.899 0.886 0.873 0.69 0.844 0.828 0.796 0.763 0.728 0.692 0.655 0.619 0.582 0.54 j 0.509 0.473 0.438 0.405 :*:'I:. 0:311 0.283 0.257 0.232 0.208 0.186 1.000 0.999 0.998 0.996 0.990 0.986 0.979 0.971 0.982 0.953 0.942 0.930 0.917 0.903 0.889 % 0:840 0.823 - 0.804 0.785 0.746 z:; 0:621 0.577 0.534 0.492 0.450 0.409 0.370 0.332 0.296 0.262 0.230 0.201 0.174 0.149 0.126 0.106 0.087 1.000 0.999 0.997 z:9"- 0:983 0.976 0.967 '0.957 0.945 0.933 0.919 0.905 t
- http://www.fcc.gov/mb/peer_review/prlpfm_rpt_economic_study.pdf
- 0.362 * (843) (444) (528) 2007 0.258 0.312 * 0.337 * (629) (417) (671) Contour/Market Measure2005 0.288 0.349 * 0.359 * (1081) (453) (281) 2007 0.263 0.329 * 0.345 * (824) (438) (455) Market Rank 101 -200 Market Measure 2005 0.463 0.396 * 0.379 * (410) (313) (444) 2007 0.398 0.426 0.348 * (353) (277) (553) Contour Measure 2005 0.317 0.405 * 0.514 * (409) (340) (418) 2007 0.290 0.361 * 0.463 * (374) (317) (492) Contour/Market Measure2005 0.374 0.423 * 0.496 * (601) (324) (242) 2007 0.328 0.402 * 0.450 * (535) (331) (317) Market Rank > 200 Market Measure 2005 0.509 0.515 0.484 (415) (279) (231) 2007 0.508 0.475 0.470 (314) (325) (311) Contour Measure 2005 0.438 0.497 *