FCC Web Documents citing 0.211

as compiled by hallikainen.com/FccRules on 2012 07 01

• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3A1.txt
  • pleadings and letters as requested by the parties. See 5 U.S.C. § 552 et seq.; 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.457, 0.459. The parties submitted redacted copies of their pleadings and letters for inclusion in the Commission's public file. Confidential information is included in the attached Appendix. Mediacom filed a ``Motion for Consideration by Full Commission,'' pursuant to 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.5(c), 0.211, 0. 283(c) and 1.41. Mediacom argues that while retransmission consent matters generally fall within the scope of the Bureau's delegated authority, the Bureau's authority extends only to matters that are minor or routine and that do not present novel questions of law, fact or policy that cannot be resolved under existing precedents and guidelines. Mediacom's motion is denied. We do
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-53A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-53A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-53A1.txt
  • (%) 67 90.6% 0.784 61 88.9% 1.009 Source: 2007/2008 survey. Attachment 2-b Average Monthly Price Sample Group Programming Service Tier January 1, 2008 January 1, 2007 N Mean Std. Error N Mean Std. Error Sample groups overall Basic cable service 674 $16.11 0.266 670 $15.33 0.257 Cable programming service 674 $33.54 0.355 670 $31.94 0.337 Expanded basic service 674 $49.65 0.211 670 $47.27 0.188 Expanded basic subscribers (%) 671 89.5% 0.279 661 88.7% 0.288 Noncompetitive Communities Basic cable service 388 $15.83 0.309 384 $15.10 0.299 Cable programming service 388 $34.14 0.412 384 $32.39 0.390 Expanded basic service 388 $49.97 0.243 384 $47.49 0.216 Expanded basic subscribers (%) 386 89.4% 0.311 378 88.6% 0.323 Communities relieved from rate regulation Basic cable service
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1658A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1658A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1658A1.txt
  • presiding officers' rulings, is amended to change the reference to section 1.301 in the second sentence to sections 1.301 and 1.302. The referenced procedures for appeals from rulings of the presiding officer are now governed by both sections. The rule is further amended to delete the third sentence because it refers to section 1.303, which the Commission has eliminated. Section 0.211(e), which pertains to the Chairman's delegated authority, is amended to change ``Federal Procurement Regulations'' to ``the Federal Acquisition Regulation'' because the Federal Procurement Regulations were repealed and replaced with the Federal Acquisition Regulation. Section 0.231(e), which pertains to the Managing Director's delegated authority, is amended to delete the second and third sentences, which are without current legal effect and therefore
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A1.txt
  • RYE TELEPHONE CO 3,660,986 2,525 1,449.89 2,023,405 0.180 462204 C R COLUMBINE ACQ CORP FairPoint Communications, Inc. 1,438,780 1,531 939.76 641,108 0.057 462206 A R STONEHAM COOP TEL CO 46,791 78 599.89 12,780 0.001 462207 C R STRASBURG TEL CO Telephone And Data Systems, Inc. 1,084,488 1,954 555.01 254,388 0.023 462208 C R CENTURYTEL-COLORADO CenturyTel, Inc. 7,322,970 10,917 670.79 2,369,244 0.211 462209 C R WIGGINS TEL ASSOC 909,971 1,833 496.44 158,116 0.014 462210 A R WILLARD TEL CO 39,180 65 602.77 10,791 0.001 465102 C N QWEST CORP-CO Qwest Communications International, Inc. 830,224,423 2,468,886 336.27 0 0.000 CONNECTICUT TOTAL 567,921,756 2,135,021 266.00 0 0.000 132454 A R THE WOODBURY TEL CO Southwestern Bell 6,365,818 24,451 260.35 0 0.000 135200 C N
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A5.txt
  • RYE TELEPHONE CO 3,660,986 2,525 1,449.89 2,023,405 0.180 462204 C R COLUMBINE ACQ CORP FairPoint Communications, Inc. 1,438,780 1,531 939.76 641,108 0.057 462206 A R STONEHAM COOP TEL CO 46,791 78 599.89 12,780 0.001 462207 C R STRASBURG TEL CO Telephone And Data Systems, Inc. 1,084,488 1,954 555.01 254,388 0.023 462208 C R CENTURYTEL-COLORADO CenturyTel, Inc. 7,322,970 10,917 670.79 2,369,244 0.211 462209 C R WIGGINS TEL ASSOC 909,971 1,833 496.44 158,116 0.014 462210 A R WILLARD TEL CO 39,180 65 602.77 10,791 0.001 465102 C N QWEST CORP-CO Qwest Communications International, Inc. 830,224,423 2,468,886 336.27 0 0.000 CONNECTICUT TOTAL 567,921,756 2,135,021 266.00 0 0.000 132454 A R THE WOODBURY TEL CO Southwestern Bell 6,365,818 24,451 260.35 0 0.000 135200 C N
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A1.txt
  • 2,327.71 1,871,759 0.176 492259 C R BACA VALLEY TEL CO 2,118,554 759 2,791.24 1,328,033 0.125 492262 C R ENMR TEL COOP INC-NM 7,737,978 11,103 696.93 1,987,236 0.186 492263 C R LA JICARITA RURAL 2,831,059 2,207 1,282.76 1,364,708 0.128 492264 C R LEACO RURAL TEL COOP 4,011,547 2,038 1,968.37 2,308,161 0.217 492265 C R TULAROSA BASIN TEL. 5,133,198 4,663 1,100.84 2,247,167 0.211 492268 C R WESTERN NEW MEXICO LICT Corporation 8,189,244 6,888 1,188.91 3,774,396 0.354 492270 C R PENASCO VALLEY TEL 5,540,302 3,227 1,716.86 3,046,060 0.286 492272 C R ROOSEVELT CNTY RURAL 1,873,340 1,955 958.23 733,041 0.069 492274 C R CENTURYTEL SW-NM CenturyTel, Inc. 4,703,026 5,489 856.81 1,640,618 0.154 493403 C R SACRED WIND 3,481,180 2,679 1,299.43 1,690,066 0.159 494449 C R
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A5.txt
  • 2,327.71 1,871,759 0.176 492259 C R BACA VALLEY TEL CO 2,118,554 759 2,791.24 1,328,033 0.125 492262 C R ENMR TEL COOP INC-NM 7,737,978 11,103 696.93 1,987,236 0.186 492263 C R LA JICARITA RURAL 2,831,059 2,207 1,282.76 1,364,708 0.128 492264 C R LEACO RURAL TEL COOP 4,011,547 2,038 1,968.37 2,308,161 0.217 492265 C R TULAROSA BASIN TEL. 5,133,198 4,663 1,100.84 2,247,167 0.211 492268 C R WESTERN NEW MEXICO LICT Corporation 8,189,244 6,888 1,188.91 3,774,396 0.354 492270 C R PENASCO VALLEY TEL 5,540,302 3,227 1,716.86 3,046,060 0.286 492272 C R ROOSEVELT CNTY RURAL 1,873,340 1,955 958.23 733,041 0.069 492274 C R CENTURYTEL SW-NM CenturyTel, Inc. 4,703,026 5,489 856.81 1,640,618 0.154 493403 C R SACRED WIND 3,481,180 2,679 1,299.43 1,690,066 0.159 494449 C R
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303886A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303886A1.txt
  • 4,030 1,753.89 3,643,279 0.381 452191 C R ACCIPITER DBA ZONA 2,869,469 353 8,128.81 2,006,886 0.210 452200 C R FORT MOJAVE TEL, INC 1,278,549 1,069 1,196.02 519,146 0.054 452226 C R MIDVALE-AZ 3,561,029 1,337 2,663.45 2,120,762 0.222 452302 C R FRONTIER SW-AZ Frontier Communications Corporation 2,034,004 5,480 371.17 0 0.000 453334 C R TABLE TOP TEL CO 4,971,166 4,144 1,199.61 2,023,637 0.211 454426 C R CITZENS-FRNTER-WH MT Frontier Communications Corporation 18,329,460 32,414 565.48 808,337 0.084 454449 C R NAVAJO-AZ-FRONTIER Frontier Communications Corporation 11,398,621 21,445 531.53 61,556 0.006 455101 C N QWEST CORP-AZ Qwest Communications International, Inc. 677,918,744 1,478,138 458.63 0 0.000 3 - 139 Table 3.31 ILEC High-Cost Loop Support Data for 2009 by Study Area Study Area Code TypeStatusStudy Area Name
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303886A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303886A5.txt
  • 4,030 1,753.89 3,643,279 0.381 452191 C R ACCIPITER DBA ZONA 2,869,469 353 8,128.81 2,006,886 0.210 452200 C R FORT MOJAVE TEL, INC 1,278,549 1,069 1,196.02 519,146 0.054 452226 C R MIDVALE-AZ 3,561,029 1,337 2,663.45 2,120,762 0.222 452302 C R FRONTIER SW-AZ Frontier Communications Corporation 2,034,004 5,480 371.17 0 0.000 453334 C R TABLE TOP TEL CO 4,971,166 4,144 1,199.61 2,023,637 0.211 454426 C R CITZENS-FRNTER-WH MT Frontier Communications Corporation 18,329,460 32,414 565.48 808,337 0.084 454449 C R NAVAJO-AZ-FRONTIER Frontier Communications Corporation 11,398,621 21,445 531.53 61,556 0.006 455101 C N QWEST CORP-AZ Qwest Communications International, Inc. 677,918,744 1,478,138 458.63 0 0.000 3 - 139 Table 3.31 ILEC High-Cost Loop Support Data for 2009 by Study Area Study Area Code TypeStatusStudy Area Name
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-289A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-289A1.txt
  • Globalstar lowered its handset prices by as much as 25 percent.209 The company also launched a price promotion that gave new and existing subscribers 30 percent off of their monthly access fees and domestic airtime until July 15.210 While Globalstar's original predictions called for nearly 700,000 mobile subscribers by the end of 2000, it has reduced that number closer to 400,000.211 B. Mobile Data 1. Introduction Mobile data service is the delivery of non-voice information to a mobile device.212 Mobile data services run the gamut from paging/messaging, to Internet access, to e-mail delivery.213 Mobile data devices include telephone handsets, pagers, handheld computers, personal digital assistants ("PDAs"), and laptop computers equipped with wireless modems. A variety of wireless providers are involved with
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-72A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-72A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-72A1.txt
  • of the Small Business Administration. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Marlene H. Dortch Secretary APPENDIX Part 0 of Title 47 of the Code of Federal Regulations is amended as follows: Part 0 -- COMMISSION ORGANIZATION The Authority citations for Part 0 continue to read as follows: Authority: Sec. 5, 48 Stat. 1068, as amended; 47 U.S.C. 155, 225, unless otherwise noted. Section 0.211 is amended by adding a new paragraph (f) to read as follows: § 0.211 Chairman. * * * * * Authority to act as ``Head of the Agency'' or ``Agency Head'' for all administrative determinations pursuant to the Debt Collection Improvement Act of 1996, Pub. L. No. 104-134, 110 Stat. 1321, 1358 (1996) (DCIA). Section 0.231 is amended by adding
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-161A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-161A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-161A1.txt
  • - Data as of 2010 - with weighted density AS1 AS2 AS7 AS8 AS13 AS14 AS15 AS16 AS17 AS18 AS21 AS22 Loops 0.891*** 0.964*** 1.008*** 1.073*** 0.529*** 0.716*** 0.756*** 0.8 95*** 0.762*** 0.844*** 0.785*** 0.621* (17.29) (11.74) (8.03) (5.79) (5.65) (8.89) (5.67) (7.44) (9.37) (6.92) (11.08) (2.07) Weighted_Density -0.0393 -0.0231 -0.0146 0.0160 -0.0735 -0.0554 0.157* - 0.0518 -0.0103 -0.0102 0.0504 0.211 (-1.27) (-0.54) (-0.16) (0.13) (-1.24) (-1.13) (2.29) (-0.49) (-0.22) ( -0.18) (1.01) (1.33) Housing_Units_nu -0.35*** -0.42*** -0.392* -0.416 0.0653 -0.287** -0.007 9 -0.374* -0.155 -0.198 -0.101 0.0367 (-5.11) (-4.39) (-2.31) (-1.69) (0.61) (-2.84) (-0.05) (-2.14) (-1.50) (-1.40) (-1.09) (0.09) Housing_Units_uc 0.139* 0.172* 0.227 0.248 0.0441 0.0248 -0.0198 0.176 0 .121 0.117 0.220 0.235 (2.26) (2.12) (0.91) (0.73) (0.41) (0.25) (-0.15)
• http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Reports/fcc00289.pdf
  • Globalstar lowered its handset prices by as much as 25 percent.209 The company also launched a price promotion that gave new and existing subscribers 30 percent off of their monthly access fees and domestic airtime until July 15.210 While Globalstar's original predictions called for nearly 700,000 mobile subscribers by the end of 2000, it has reduced that number closer to 400,000.211 B. Mobile Data 1. Introduction Mobile data service is the delivery of non-voice information to a mobile device.212 Mobile data services run the gamut from paging/messaging, to Internet access, to e-mail delivery.213 Mobile data devices include telephone handsets, pagers, handheld computers, personal digital assistants ("PDAs"), and laptop computers equipped with wireless modems. A variety of wireless providers are involved with
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/conferences/combin2000/releases/98540193.pdf
  • of 100% outcomes in each treatment. In the additive environment 60% of the observations are at the 100% level of efficiency. Table 4.1.1c below provides the ANOVA table for the analysis of efficiency in the additive environment. Table 4.1.1c ANOVA Efficiency: Additive Environment Variable F-statistic p-value Flexible 0.362 0.552 Unequal 0.700 0.410 Environment Pairing 0.694 0.412 Number of Bidders 1.653 0.211 Flexible Unequal 0.010 0.918 Table 4.1.1c shows that in the additive environment neither treatment (Flexible nor Unequal) has any effect on efficiency, nor does their joint occurrence. (An indicator variable that accounts for the interaction of two variables will be named using the symbol in this and following tables.) In addition, it shows that there is no significant effect from
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/conferences/combin2001/papers/combexch.pdf
  • nipulationlevelinLargeandThresholdislessthanundertheotherrules:around10% and20%inLargeandThreshold,comparedwith30%,40%and50%inFractional,Equal andNo-Discount.Inaddition,theamountofutilitygaininLargeandThresholdismuch lessthanintheotherschemes.Inaddition,noticethatVickrey,LargeandThresholdhave lowerabsolutevaluesofutilitygainacrosstherangeofpossiblelevelsofmanipulation,and thatthemaximalindividualagentgainfrommanipulationislowerthaninotherschemes. 41 0 10 20 30 40 50 -3 -2 -1 0 1 2 Agent Manipulation (%) Utility Gain regular small equal reverse frac thresh large Vickrey Figure13:AverageSingle-AgentGaininUtilityfrommanipulationbyy%(vs.truthfulbidding), inasysteminwhicheveryotheragentmanipulatesbyy%.Problemsize:12buyers/4sellers. Bywayofcomparison,Figure13plotstheaveragesingle-agentutilitygainfrommanip- ulationinanexchangewithmorebuyersthansellers,inthiscase12buyersand4sellers. Althoughthesamebasicobservationshold,withtheequilibriummanipulationlevelinthe ThresholdandLargeschemeslessthanintheotherschemes,theoptimallevelofmanipu- lationappearstobehigherthaninthe5buyer/5sellerprobleminFigure12.Infactthis effectmightnotbetooimportantbecausetheabsolutegainfrommanipulationofThreshold andLargeissmallerinthisexperiment. InTable5wesummarizetheexperimentalmanipulationresultsacrossallproblem configurations.Wetabulatetheaverageoptimaldegreeofmanipulationbyagentsineach scheme.OverallproblemstheLargeandThresholdschemesperformquitewell,witharound 20%manipulation;thisisincomparison,forexample,withapproaching50%manipulation intheEqual,Small,andNoDiscountschemes.Wealsocomputetheaverageutilitygain ineachschemefrommanipulationat10%,20%,and30%;againLargeandThresholddo wellunderthismetric. 6.3ExperimentalResults:Efficiency Figure14(a)plotstheallocativeefficiencyoftheexchangeatdifferentlevelsofmanipula- tion,averagedacrossallproblemconfigurations.Noticethattheallocativeefficiencyfalls almostlinearly(andevenpoint-for-point)withmanipulation,from100%at0%manipula- tionto20%at80%manipulation.Table5presentstheaverageallocativeefficiencyinthe 42 No-DiscountVickreySmall Frac UtilityGain 0.799 -0.195 0.479 0.211 Correlation 0.053 1.0 0.356 0.590 Manipulation, 48 0 48 32 Efficiency(%) 58 100 58 78 Threshold Equal LargeReverse UtilityGain 0.110 0.516 0.029 0.337 Correlation 0.543 0.356 0.176 0.522 Manipulation, 22 46 18 44 Efficiency(%) 86 62 88 64 Table5:Experimentalresults,averagedacrossallconfigurations.Utilitygainistheaveragesingle- agentutilitygainfrommanipulationineachscheme,averagedovermanip.10%,20%,and30%. CorrelationwithVickreydiscountsisalsocomputedformanip.10%,20%and30%.Manipulationis theaverageequilibriumlevelofmanipulationselectedbyagents.Efficiencyistheaverageallocative efficiencyatthatlevelofmanipulation. exchangeundereachpaymentrule,attheoptimalmanipulationequilibrium.Threshold andLargeachievegreaterthan85%allocative-efficiency,whileEqualSmallandNoDis- countmanageonlyaround60%efficiency.Theefficiencyeffectisquitesignificantatthese manipulationlevels. Itisalsointerestingtoconsiderhowmuchofaproblembudget-balanceiswiththe Vickreymechanismintheseproblems.Figure14(b)plotsthedegreeofbudget-balance failurewithVickreypaymentsatdifferentlevelsofmanipulation.Thebudgetdeficitwith Vickreydiscountsfallslinearlyasthelevelofmanipulationincreases,butisstillaproblem evenwhenagentsmanipulateby80%. 0 40 80 0 20 40 60 80
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/conferences/combin2001/papers/parkes.pdf
  • reverse frac thresh large Vickrey Figure5:AverageSingle-AgentGaininUtilityfrommanipula- tionbyy%(vs.truthfulbidding),inasysteminwhicheveryother agentmanipulatesbyy%.Problemsize:5buyers/5sellers. Inourtheoreticalmodelweadoptedaverage-casebudget- balancetomaketheanalysistractable.Wenowrevertto themorenaturalworst-case(orevery-time)budget-balance inwhichthemarketmakerdistributesexactlytheavailable surpluseverytimetheexchangeiscleared.Paymentrules arenowcomputedafterbidsarereceived. Weperformalimitedstrategicanalysis.First,weassume thatthestrategyofagentlistoadjustallitsbidsandasksby thesamefractionalamount,yl%,i.e.submittingbidprices y l %belowvalueandaskpricesyl%abovevalue.Second, welookforasymmetricNashequilibriuminwhichevery agentfollowsthesamestrategy,forsomey%.Finally,we computeanapproximationtothisequilibriumforcomputa- tionaltractability.Wecomputetheaverageutilitygaintoa singleagentfor0%vs.y%manipulation,giventhatevery otheragentmanipulatesbyy%,anddeterminetheamount ofmanipulation,y ,thatmaximizesthisutilitygain.Weas- sumethatthisisalsotheoptimalstrategyforanindividual agentagainstapopulationofagentswithfixedstrategiesy , andthereforetheNashequilibrium.11 Giventhis,wereadoffthesymmetricNashequilibrium underaparticularpaymentruleasthepeakofaplotsuchas thatinFigure5,whichplotsthegaininutilityforstrategy y %vs.0%inasysteminwhicheveryagentfollowsstrat- egyy%,inthiscaseforthe5buyers/5sellersproblemset. Inthiscase,noticethattheequilibriummanipulationlevel inLargeandThresholdislessthanundertheotherrules, inthiscasearound10%and20%inLargeandThreshold, comparedwith30%,40%and50%inFractional,Equaland No-Discount.Inaddition,theamountofutilitygaininLarge andThresholdismuchlessthanintheotherschemes. InTable4wesummarizetheresultsofexperimentsacross allproblemsets.Wecompare:theaverageutilitygain,and thecorrelationwithVickreydiscounts,atmanipulationlev- elsof10%,20%and30%ineachscheme;andtheaverage optimaldegreeofmanipulationbyagentsineachscheme, 11Onebenefitofthistechniqueisthatwehaveamethodtomea- surethedegreeofmanipulationevenwhenthereisinfactnosym- metricpureNashequilibrium. No-Discount Vickrey Small Frac UtilityGain 0.799 -0.195 0.479 0.211 Correlation 0.053 1.0 0.356 0.590 Manipulation, 48 0 48 32 Efficiency(%) 58 100 58 78 Threshold Equal Large Reverse UtilityGain 0.110 0.516 0.029 0.337 Correlation 0.543 0.356 0.176 0.522 Manipulation, 22 46 18 44 Efficiency(%) 86 62 88 64 Table4:Experimentalresults.UtilitygainandCorrelationwith Vickreydiscountscomputedformanip.10%,20%and30%,and averagedoverallprobleminstances(for5­20agents). andthecorrespondingallocativeefficiency.Theallocative efficiencyintheLargeandThresholdschemesisconsider- ablyhigherthanintheotherschemes. Discussion ThepartialorderingfLarge,Thresholdg Fractional Re- verse fEqual,Smallgfromtheexperimentalresultsisre- markablyconsistentwiththeresultsofourtheoreticalanal- ysis.AlthoughtheLargeschemegeneratesslightlylessma- nipulationandhigherallocativeefficiencythanThreshold, thecorrelationbetweendiscountsandVickreydiscountsis muchgreaterinThresholdthanLarge.Anagent'sdiscount inLargeisverysensitivetoitsbid,andweexpectLarge tobelessrobustthanThresholdinpracticebecauseofthis all-or-nothingcharacteristic. Asdiscussedearlier,wehavemadeanumberofassump-
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/data/papersAndStudies/fc000289.pdf
  • Globalstar lowered its handset prices by as much as 25 percent.209 The company also launched a price promotion that gave new and existing subscribers 30 percent off of their monthly access fees and domestic airtime until July 15.210 While Globalstar's original predictions called for nearly 700,000 mobile subscribers by the end of 2000, it has reduced that number closer to 400,000.211 B. Mobile Data 1. Introduction Mobile data service is the delivery of non-voice information to a mobile device.212 Mobile data services run the gamut from paging/messaging, to Internet access, to e-mail delivery.213 Mobile data devices include telephone handsets, pagers, handheld computers, personal digital assistants ("PDAs"), and laptop computers equipped with wireless modems. A variety of wireless providers are involved with
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/reports/documents/fc000289.pdf
  • Globalstar lowered its handset prices by as much as 25 percent.209 The company also launched a price promotion that gave new and existing subscribers 30 percent off of their monthly access fees and domestic airtime until July 15.210 While Globalstar's original predictions called for nearly 700,000 mobile subscribers by the end of 2000, it has reduced that number closer to 400,000.211 B. Mobile Data 1. Introduction Mobile data service is the delivery of non-voice information to a mobile device.212 Mobile data services run the gamut from paging/messaging, to Internet access, to e-mail delivery.213 Mobile data devices include telephone handsets, pagers, handheld computers, personal digital assistants ("PDAs"), and laptop computers equipped with wireless modems. A variety of wireless providers are involved with
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Intl/4361-f00.pdf
  • 376,437,26934.833.7 0.316.115.1 Norway $31,139,00950.428.9 0.5 9.011.2 $2,616,73655.525.9 0.0 5.413.2 $1,346,78799.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 115,209,00237.129.4 0.212.121.2 Portugal $44,232,46947.643.7 0.4 6.5 1.8 $2,854,11849.731.4 0.015.9 3.1 $463,54147.048.5 0.0 4.6 0.0 100,625,64646.731.3 0.312.7 9.0 Spain $188,638,36241.647.5 0.7 7.5 2.7 $7,388,41833.722.1 0.013.930.2 $1,463,25881.710.5 0.0 7.7 0.0 446,172,69236.338.0 0.413.012.3 Sweden $55,574,53150.729.0 0.512.1 7.8 $6,987,79840.340.2 0.0 6.213.3 $1,163,63892.7 6.0 0.0 1.3 0.0 327,893,75238.432.6 0.212.016.8 Switzerland $78,663,98361.923.8 0.211.1 3.0 $7,775,74338.129.4 0.030.0 2.5 $2,393,20793.4 2.9 0.0 3.6 0.1 296,127,17938.934.1 0.116.810.0 Turkey $80,329,33433.554.3 3.3 6.7 2.2 $5,850,76433.554.8 0.010.6 1.1 $1,115,73678.7 2.4 0.018.8 0.0 176,854,71830.248.0 3.211.0 7.7 United Kingdom $693,912,87262.722.7 0.111.3 3.2 $48,044,55416.151.9 0.022.4 9.6 $4,315,97322.831.0 0.0 2.244.0 2,612,172,56143.529.1 0.118.6 8.8 Western Europe $2,562,307,23052.233.7 0.5 9.9 3.8 $182,617,02644.332.4 0.014.3 9.0 $34,904,28771.019.3 0.0 4.2 5.5 8,393,303,49141.030.5 0.415.113.0 Algeria $4,689,67024.342.416.9 6.210.2 $1,011,03530.332.1 0.0
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Intl/4361-f99.pdf
  • 0.0 0.0 0.0 $898,49295.6 4.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 11,753,36019.918.426.1 3.632.1 Canary Island $4,671 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0100.0 $2,507 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0100.0 $0 52,964 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0100.0 Cape Verde $6,503,18640.420.311.0 3.624.7 $340,98359.237.7 0.0 0.0 3.1 $73,69299.7 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 11,906,05426.516.418.3 6.732.1 Central African Republic $164,080 0.017.149.5 8.424.9 $58,028 0.0100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 $0 282,603 0.026.141.011.321.5 Chad $360,296 3.638.0 0.211.846.4 $55,389 0.199.0 0.0 0.0 0.9 $0 507,381 0.932.1 0.118.348.6 Comoros $522,834 0.0 3.264.420.711.8 $1,886 0.013.6 0.0 0.086.4 $0 1,860,278 0.0 1.471.715.311.6 Congo $1,830,62255.4 5.4 5.911.322.1 $132,84454.831.6 0.0 0.013.6 $1,948,48592.1 7.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 2,480,19423.1 6.8 7.419.643.0 Cote d'Ivoire $16,517,94148.637.4 1.6 0.012.4 $3,890,22547.152.5 0.0 0.0 0.4 $1,835,82360.739.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 16,342,30431.148.6 1.7 0.018.6 Djibouti $1,037,70034.716.221.9 3.523.7 $100,27497.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.1
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrs01-0.pdf
  • COMMUNICATIONS 39,107,818 117,268 333.49 2,698,222 0.293 442112C R MID-PLAINS RURAL TEL 1,764,838 3,336 529.03 547,543 0.060 442114C R CENTEL OF TEXAS United Telephone System Inc. 68,696,243 226,520 303.27 117,303 0.013 442116C R MUENSTER DBA NORTEX 2,494,260 4,015 621.24 936,655 0.102 442117C R CENTURYTEL-PORT ARANCenturyTel, Inc. 1,760,944 4,591 383.56 255,051 0.028 442130C R PEOPLES TEL COOP -TX 6,477,170 12,543 516.40 1,939,888 0.211 442131C R POKA-LAMBRO TEL COOP 1,856,098 3,917 473.86 480,828 0.052 442134C R RIVIERA TEL CO INC 1,028,791 1,356 758.70 456,137 0.050 442135C R SOUTHWEST TEXAS TEL 3,201,814 4,437 721.62 1,369,143 0.149 442140C R CENTURYTEL-SAN MARCOCenturyTel, Inc. 10,685,622 32,058 333.32 734,081 0.080 442141C R SANTA ROSA TEL COOP 1,392,872 2,397 581.09 487,014 0.053 442143C R SOUTH PLAINS TEL 1,709,475 5,325 321.03
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrs02-0.pdf
  • COOP INC-NM 7,089,552 12,665 559.78 2,370,130 0.243 492263C R LA JICARITA RURAL 1,999,290 2,215 902.61 984,042 0.101 492264C R LEACO RURAL TEL COOP 2,407,018 2,446 984.06 1,236,087 0.127 492265C R TULAROSA BASIN TEL. 2,883,723 5,150 559.95 964,429 0.099 492268C R WESTERN NEW MEXICO Lynch Interactive Corporation 6,561,266 6,715 977.11 3,358,424 0.345 492270C R PENASCO VALLEY TEL 3,785,306 3,384 1,118.59 2,051,542 0.211 492272C R ROOSEVELT CNTY RURAL 1,911,480 2,373 805.51 881,422 0.090 492274C R CENTURYTEL SW-NM CenturyTel, Inc. 3,838,356 6,224 616.70 1,430,463 0.147 494449C R NAVAJO COMMUN-NM Citizens Communications Company 4,580,081 6,833 670.29 1,845,065 0.189 495105C N QWEST CORP-NM Qwest Communications International, Inc. 250,341,609 860,898 290.79 0 0.000 TOTAL: NEW YORK 3,209,035,93913,230,572 242.55 11,761,025 1.207 150071C R ARMSTRONG TEL CO-NY Armstrong Utilities
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/SOCC/96socc.pdf
  • 138.1 4.882 133.2 117.7 15.58 15.58 OR PENNSYLVANIA 556.0 (0.346) 556.4 498.7 32.29 3.6 6.8 10.4 21.92 PA RHODE ISLAND 42.7 42.7 42.7 (0.02) (0.02)RI SOUTH CAROLINA 85.0 0.111 84.9 81.7 3.25 3.25 SC SOUTH DAKOTA 32.7 0.038 32.7 32.6 0.09 0.09 SD TENNESSEE 116.7 116.7 112.8 3.98 3.98 TN TEXAS 505.6 (2.038) 507.6 501.2 6.41 6.41 TX UTAH 77.0 0.211 76.8 76.2 0.53 0.53 UT VERMONT 38.3 38.3 38.3 (0.01) (0.01)VT VIRGINIA 159.6 (0.591) 160.2 143.1 17.05 1.0 1.9 2.9 14.13 VA WASHINGTON 322.1 4.766 317.3 298.5 18.77 18.77WA WEST VIRGINIA 59.2 59.2 57.2 2.04 0.2 0.4 0.7 1.38WV WISCONSIN 205.0 0.085 204.9 204.8 0.08 0.08 WI WYOMING 30.1 0.032 30.0 30.0 0.07 0.07WY PUERTO RICO 263.3 263.3 261.6 1.72
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Reports/fcc00289.pdf
  • Globalstar lowered its handset prices by as much as 25 percent.209 The company also launched a price promotion that gave new and existing subscribers 30 percent off of their monthly access fees and domestic airtime until July 15.210 While Globalstar's original predictions called for nearly 700,000 mobile subscribers by the end of 2000, it has reduced that number closer to 400,000.211 B. Mobile Data 1. Introduction Mobile data service is the delivery of non-voice information to a mobile device.212 Mobile data services run the gamut from paging/messaging, to Internet access, to e-mail delivery.213 Mobile data devices include telephone handsets, pagers, handheld computers, personal digital assistants ("PDAs"), and laptop computers equipped with wireless modems. A variety of wireless providers are involved with