FCC Web Documents citing 0.15

as compiled by hallikainen.com/FccRules on 2012 07 01

• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-13A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-13A1.pdf
  • until September 8, 2008, when it achieved compliance. In light of achieving the 95 percent benchmark, SouthernLINC also seeks relief from the reporting requirements imposed in the Waiver Order. discussion SouthernLINC achieved 94.85 percent compliance as of July 28, 2008, and full compliance with the 95 percent benchmark approximately three weeks following its August 15th deadline. We find that the 0.15 percent variance from the 95 percent compliance benchmark coupled with the short delay before SouthernLINC achieved 95 percent compliance constitute a de minimis exception and, as a result, we grant, nunc pro tunc, SouthernLINC's Amended Request for an extension until September 8, 2008. In light of SouthernLINC's achievement of 95% penetration of location-capable handsets, we also amend the previously-imposed reporting
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1525A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1525A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1525A1.txt
  • equipment'' to include network power equipment, and classifying associated equipment according to predominant use rather than its own characteristics). See, e.g., Verizon Transmittal No. 1373; Workpaper 1.0, page 3 (comparing total unit investment to separate statewide unit investments, according to power equipment item). For example, the weight to be attributed to rectifiers in Washington, D.C. is $33.49 ( $221.40 = 0.15. Sprint Petition at 3-4. Verizon uses the overhead loading factors established by the Commission's 1997 physical collocation tariff investigation order. See Physical Collocation Tariff Investigation Order, 12 FCC Rcd. at 18982, Appendix D (1997); see also id. at 18853-59 (discussion of overhead loading standards and prescriptions). Sprint Petition at 3. Verizon Reply at 9. See Physical Collocation Tariff Investigation Order,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-92A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-92A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-92A1.txt
  • to accommodate the upgrade, is in the public interest because it will not prejudice any of the applicants there and will allow Station KLMP to upgrade. An engineering analysis has determined that Channel 250C can be allotted at Rapid City, South Dakota, at petitioner's requested site. Additionally, Channel 282A can be allotted at Gillette, Wyoming, at a site 0.25 kilometers (0.15 miles) north of the community. As requested, we shall also propose to modify the license of Station KLMP to specify operation on Channel 250C. Accordingly, pursuant to the authority contained in Sections 4(i), 5(c)(1), 303(g) and (r) and 307(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, and Sections 0.61. 0.204(b) and 0.283 of the Commission's Rules, IT IS ORDERED,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-411A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-411A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-411A1.txt
  • d =1.726 x h0.35 x p0.18, where d is the radial distance in kilometers, h is the radial antenna HAAT in meters, and p is the radial ERP in watts. For stations with HAAT of less than 150 meters, the distance to the interference contour of the proposed station is calculated using the formula d = 9.471 x h0.23 x p0.15. In both cases, the rules provide that ``[t]he value used for p in the above formula must not be less than 27 dB less than the maximum ERP in any direction, or 0.1 watt, whichever is more.'' Shell proposes to use a directional antenna with a beamwidth of 60 degrees and a front-to-back ratio of 35 dB. Shell offers an
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2738A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2738A2.txt
  • 1.0609 0.0000 0.0000 initial growth year 2 4 1.1255 0.0646 0.0397 5 1.1255 0.0000 0.0000 6 1.1941 0.0685 0.0330 7 1.1941 0.0000 0.0000 8 1.2668 0.0727 0.0275 9 1.2668 0.0000 0.0000 10 1.3439 0.0771 0.0228 11 1.3439 0.0000 0.0000 12 1.3439 0.0000 0.0000 PV Installed Initial Trunks 1.0000 PV Installed Growth Trunks 0.1707 New Discount Weight 0.85 Growth Discount Weight 0.15 Federal Communications Commission DA 03-2738 APPENDIX E UNE Loop Rates 9 Federal Communications Commission DA 03-2738 APPENDIX E UNE Loop Rates 10 Unbundled Loop Type Recurring Rate 2 Wire Basic Unbundled Loop - Density Cell 1 $11.89 2 Wire Basic Unbundled Loop - Density Cell 2 $15.26 2 Wire Basic Unbundled Loop - Density Cell 3 $28.43 2 Wire Basic
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2680A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2680A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2680A1.txt
  • PAS-9 still has many years of station-kept life remaining and still can provide useful services. PanAmSat also states that it has entered into an agreement to lease all of the C-band transponders on the satellite to Arabsat for use at 26.15º E.L. PanAmSat states that the PAS-9 satellite will essentially be co-located with Arabsat 2A located at 26º E.L., with 0.15 degrees of separation to facilitate station-keeping. On December 5, 2003, Panamsat submitted a copy of its agreement with Arabsat, subject to a request for confidential treatment. On June 8, 2004, PanAmSat amended its application to change the proposed pointing of the PAS-9 C-band and TT&C beams in order to meet customer requirements more effectively. III. Discussion We find that the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2545A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2545A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2545A1.txt
  • at the 93° W.L. orbital location. 6. On May 5, 2006, ICO amended its request to provide for satellite operations at 92.85° W.L. instead of 93° W.L. ICO maintains that this change will simplify station keeping operations and minimize the likelihood of in-orbit collisions with other satellites. In coordinating its proposed operations with Intelsat, ICO determined that operating at a 0.15º offset from 93° W.L. would avoid the need for any changes to Intelsat's orbital position and help ensure against physical collision between the two satellites. In addition, ICO requests that the Commission defer action on its request for a waiver to permit the use of C-band frequencies for emergency TT&C operations, pending completion of frequency coordination with other satellite operators.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1564A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1564A2.txt
  • quite good. Table 7-3. D/U Ratio for Repeat of Baseline Test Relative to Baseline D/U Ratio Relative to Baseline (dB) Channel Offset A3 D3 I1 J1 M1 N1 O1 G4 G4 again Mean (dB) (Excluding G4) Standard Deviation (dB) (Excluding G4) N-6 -0.73 0.01 0.00 0.02-0.48-0.27-0.11-6.23 -0.23 -0.22 0.29 N-4 -0.69 0.11 0.50 0.13-0.36-0.22-0.01-3.37 -0.09 -0.08 0.39 N-3 -0.47 -0.68 0.15 0.06-0.26-0.44 0.10 0.14 0.63 -0.22 0.33 N-2 -0.31 -0.21 0.33 0.00-0.04-0.15 0.12 0.68 0.19 -0.04 0.22 N+2 0.06 -0.90-0.03 0.15 0.44-0.01 0.13-0.28 0.36 -0.02 0.42 Mean -0.43 -0.33 0.19 0.07-0.14-0.22 0.05-1.81 0.17 -0.12 Std Dev 0.32 0.44 0.22 0.07 0.36 0.16 0.10 2.93 0.34 0.33 Note: The overall means and standard deviations (lower right corner of the chart) omitted data
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-30A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-30A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-30A1.txt
  • amount Yi = provisionally winning bid amount from the current round Examples C=0.5, N = 0.1, M = 0.2 Round 1 (1 bidder submitting bids, provisionally winning bid = $1,000,000) 1. Calculation of additional percentage for round 2: A1 = (0.5 * 1) + (0.5 * 0) = 0.5 I2 = The smaller of [((1 + 0.5) * 0.1) = 0.15] and 0.2 (the maximum additional percentage) = 0.15 2. Calculation of dollar amount associated with the additional percentage for round 2 (using I2 from above): X2 = 0.15 * $1,000,000 = $150,000 3. Minimum acceptable bid amount for round 2 = $1,150,000 Round 2 (3 bidders submitting bids, provisionally winning bid = $2,000,000) 1. Calculation of additional percentage for round
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3415A3.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3415A3.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3415A3.txt
  • covering the license. See Attachment C for more information on CPEs.) Examples C = 0.5, N = 0.1, M = 0.2 Round 1 (1 bidder submitting bids, CPE = $1,000,000) 1. Calculation of additional percentage for round 2: A1 = (0.5 * 1) + (0.5 * 0) = 0.5 I2 = The smaller of [((1 + 0.5) * 0.1) = 0.15] and 0.2 (the maximum additional percentage) = 0.15 2. Calculation of dollar amount associated with the additional percentage for round 2 (using I2 from above): X2 = 0.15 * $1,000,000 = $150,000 3. Minimum acceptable bid amount for round 2 = $1,150,000 Round 2 (3 bidders submitting bids, CPE = $2,000,000) 1. Calculation of additional percentage for round 3: A2
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3470A4.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3470A4.txt
  • 1.94 GMoviesorTV-Y/TV-Y7TV 3.18 3.28 3.04 2.94 Eitheroftheabove 4.88 5.19 5.19 4.88 FamilyProgramming NetworksTargetingFamilies 11.46 10.89 10.69 10.74 TY-GProgramming 11.35 12.18 11.93 10.94 Arts,Educational,orDocumentaryProgramming 8.32 7.46 7.05 7.62 Eitherofthetwoabove 19.67 19.64 18.98 18.56 AdultProgramming NetworksShowingAdultProgramming 4.84 4.60 4.89 5.52 NC-17MoviesorTV-MA-S/TV-MA-LTV 0.75 0.48 0.63 0.83 ViolentProgramming "ViolentProgramming" 1.52 1.71 1.94 1.63 TV-PG-VTelevision 1.43 1.45 1.54 1.41 TV-14-VTelevision 1.37 1.40 1.56 1.51 TV-MA-VTelevision 0.15 0.16 0.23 0.22 Anyofthethreeabove 2.95 3.01 3.33 3.14 Anyofthelasttwoabove 1.52 1.56 1.79 1.73 ReligiousProgramming NetworksShowingPrimarilyReligiousProgramming 1.64 1.56 1.49 1.40 "ReligiousProgramming" 3.31 3.15 2.92 2.79 OverallTargeting AverageTVContentRating(wherenotedforTV) 3.71 3.75 3.84 3.93 AverageMPAARating(wherenotedformovies) 3.99 3.93 3.98 3.95 Observations 61,31464,56067,53071,984 Notes:Reportedinthetableisthepercentageofquarter-hoursofprogrammingbyprogramtypeandyear. ItistheanalogofTable6splitoutbyyear.Averageisoverthesamenetworksandtimeperiodsdescribed inthenotestoTable6.Source:Authorcalculations.39 Table11: ProgramAvailabilitybyProgramTypeandTime 6:00p.m.-12:00a.m.EST(orequivalent),2weeks/year,2003-2006 Variable 2003 2004 2005 2006 NewsProgramming AnyNews 47.79 46.11 48.59 51.07 NetworkNews 55.60 52.73 52.15 47.71 LocalNews
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3470A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3470A5.txt
  • the Market 0.0032 0.7310 1.0032 -0.0124 0.1250 0.9877 0.12 Market Median Commute Time -0.1226 0.1260 0.8846 -0.0626 0.1950 0.9394 -0.49 Percentage of Market Population Male -0.5149 0.1770 0.5976 -0.3399 0.1680 0.7119 -1.47 Percentage of Market Population Black or African American -0.0043 0.8970 0.9957 0.0159 0.4760 1.0160 -0.16 Percentage of Market Population Hispanic or Latino 0.0331 0.3390 1.0336 0.0143 0.3680 1.0144 0.15 Percentage of Market Population Aged 18 to 24 0.0617 0.7750 1.0636 0.1120 0.3760 1.1185 -0.37 Percentage of Market Population Aged 25 to 34 -0.5231 0.6820 0.5927 -0.0935 0.7660 0.9107 -3.43 Percentage of Market Population Aged 35 to 44 0.1793 0.6820 1.1964 0.2477 0.3740 1.2811 -0.48 Percentage of Market Population Aged 45 to 64 0.1546 0.6400 1.1671 -0.0147 0.8980 0.9854 1.34
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3470A6.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3470A6.txt
  • 555 CPM, Average 10.55 8.99 4.86 34.84 555 Adult AQH Rating, AM Drive 1.13 0.78 0.00 11.57 427 Adult AQH Rating, Evening 0.28 0.21 0.00 2.54 417 Adult AQH Rating, Average 0.87 0.65 0.00 6.18 417 Number of Sisters in Market 3.05 3.00 0.00 10.00 569 Number of Commercial Stations in Market 30.07 27.00 4.00 88.00 569 Market HHI 0.16 0.15 0.04 1.00 569 Percentage of Stations with Cross-Owned Newspaper in Market 0.01 0.00 0.00 1.00 569 Percentage of Stations with Cross-Owned TV Station in Market 0.10 0.00 0.00 1.00 569 Number of Stations Owned Nationally by Owners in Market 272.68 37.00 1.00 1,243.00 569 Number of Markets in which Owner is Present 48.75 8.00 1.00 207.00 569 Population 2005 (000s)
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3470A7.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3470A7.txt
  • Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Adjusted R-squared .16 .23 .31 .51 .67 Notes: Absolute values of t-statistics in parentheses (using heteroscedastic-consistent standard errors corrected for clustering by television station); ***p<.01, **p<.05 and *p<.10. 37 Table 5: Local News Coverage Excluding Sports and Weather (in seconds) Independent variables (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) Local station ownership Cross-owned newspaper 25.7 (0.65) 8.4 (0.15) -10.2 (0.20) 25.0 (0.59) 12.6 (0.38) Cross-owned radio station -301.4*** (2.88) -264.8** (2.64) -213.0*** (3.01) -170.6*** (2.77) Cross-owned radio and newspaper 239.6* (1.73) 285.2** (2.29) 258.3** (2.57) 210.2** (2.30) Parent company coverage of all television households (%) 12.0*** (3.39) 10.4*** (3.40) 5.3* (1.87) Network owned and operated -129.1 (1.52) -175.0* (1.89) -68.4 (0.83) Network affiliation (omitted category is CW\MyNetwork) ABC
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4171A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4171A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4171A1.txt
  • covering the license. See Attachment H for more information on CPEs.) Examples C = 0.5, N = 0.1, M = 0.2 Round 1 (1 bidder submitting bids, CPE = $1,000,000) 1. Calculation of additional percentage for round 2: A1 = (0.5 * 1) + (0.5 * 0) = 0.5 I2 = The smaller of [((1 + 0.5) * 0.1) = 0.15] and 0.2 (the maximum additional percentage) = 0.15 2. Calculation of dollar amount associated with the additional percentage for round 2 (using I2 from above): X2 = 0.15 * $1,000,000 = $150,000 3. Minimum acceptable bid amount for round 2 = $1,150,000 Round 2 (3 bidders submitting bids, CPE = $2,000,000) 1. Calculation of additional percentage for round 3: A2
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-514A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-514A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-514A1.txt
  • amount Yi = provisionally winning bid amount from the current round Examples C=0.5, N = 0.1, M = 0.2 Round 1 (1 bidder submitting bids, provisionally winning bid = $1,000,000) 1. Calculation of additional percentage for round 2: A1 = (0.5 * 1) + (0.5 * 0) = 0.5 I2 = The smaller of [((1 + 0.5) * 0.1) = 0.15] and 0.2 (the maximum additional percentage) = 0.15 2. Calculation of dollar amount associated with the additional percentage for round 2 (using I2 from above): X2 = 0.15 * $1,000,000 = $150,000 3. Minimum acceptable bid amount for round 2 = $1,150,000 Round 2 (3 bidders submitting bids, provisionally winning bid = $2,000,000) 1. Calculation of additional percentage for round
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1090A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1090A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1090A1.txt
  • Yi = provisionally winning bid from the current round Examples C = 0.5, N = 0.1, M = 0.2 Round 1 (1 bidder submitting bids, provisionally winning bid = $1,000,000) 1. Calculation of additional percentage for round 2: A1 = (0.5 * 1) + (0.5 * 0) = 0.5 I2 = The smaller of [((1 + 0.5) * 0.1) = 0.15] and 0.2 (the maximum additional percentage) = 0.15 2. Calculation of dollar amount associated with the additional percentage for round 2 (using I2 from above): X2 = 0.15 * $1,000,000 = $150,000 3. Minimum acceptable bid amount for round 2 = $1,150,000 Round 2 (3 bidders submitting bids, provisionally winning bid = $2,000,000) 1. Calculation of additional percentage for round
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1204A1.pdf
  • SES Americom, Inc. Nature of Service: Direct to Home Fixed Satellite, Fixed Satellite Service On May 19, 2008, the Satellite Policy Branch granted SES Americom, Inc.'s request to operate the AMC-2 satellite at the 100.95º W.L. orbital location in the 3700-4200 MHz (space-to-Earth), 5925-6425 MHz (Earth-to-space), 11.7-12.2 GHz (space-to-Earth), and 14.0-14.5 GHz (Earth-to-space) bands with an east-west station-keeping range of 0.15 degrees of longitude between 100.90º W.L. and 101.05º W.L. orbital location, in accordance with the specifications in the application and the previously established terms, conditions, and specifications for operation of AMC-2. (See File No. SAT-AMD-20080311-00070). The Satellite Policy Branch also granted SES Americom's request to relinquish its C-band frequencies at the 85º W.L. orbiral location. S2367 SAT-MOD-20080204-00036 E Effective Date:
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-767A4.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-767A4.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-767A4.txt
  • = provisionally winning bid amount from the current round Examples C = 0.5, N = 0.1, M = 0.2 Round 1 (1 bidder submitting bids, provisionally winning bid = $1,000,000) 1. Calculation of additional percentage for round 2: A1 = (0.5 * 1) + (0.5 * 0) = 0.5 I2 = The smaller of [((1 + 0.5) * 0.1) = 0.15] and 0.2 (the maximum additional percentage) = 0.15 2. Calculation of dollar amount associated with the additional percentage for round 2 (using I2 from above): X2 = 0.15 * $1,000,000 = $150,000 3. Minimum acceptable bid amount for round 2 = $1,150,000 Round 2 (3 bidders submitting bids, provisionally winning bid = $2,000,000) 1. Calculation of additional percentage for round
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-857A1.pdf
  • an effective date is specified. For more information concerning this Notice, contact the Satellite Division at 202-418-0719; TTY 202-418-2555. S2134 SAT-STA-20080311-00063 E Effective Date: 04/04/2008 Grant of Authority Special Temporary Authority SES Americom, Inc. On April 4, 2008, the Satellite Policy Branch granted special temporary authority to SES Americom, Inc. to operate the AMC-2 satellite within a station-keeping range of 0.15 degrees of longitude between 100.90º W.L. and 101.05º W.L. for a period of sixty days, pending disposition of an application for modification of the license for AMC-2 to authorize such operation for the duration of the license term (File No. SAT-MOD-20080124-00030, as amended by SAT-AMD-20080311-00070) and subject to certain conditions. S2135 SAT-STA-20080311-00067 E Effective Date: 04/04/2008 Grant of Authority Special
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1132A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1132A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1132A1.txt
  • SAT-LOA-20050210-00030 SAT-AMD-20051118-00239 SAT-AMD-20080114-00009 SAT-AMD-20080617-00124 SAT-AMD-20080701-00137 Call Sign: S2661 AND AUTHORIZATION Adopted: May 26, 2009 Released: May 26, 2009 By the Chief, Satellite Division, International Bureau: I. INTRODUCTION By this Order, we grant Intelsat North America LLC (Intelsat) authority to construct, launch, and operate a 17/24 GHz Broadcasting-Satellite Service (BSS) space station at the 95.15° W.L. orbital location, which is offset 0.15° from the 95° W.L. orbital location specified in Appendix F to the 17/24 GHz Report and Order, at a reduced power and without full interference protection. Specifically, Intelsat is authorized to use the 24.75-25.25 GHz frequency band (Earth-to-space) and the 17.3-17.8 GHz frequency band (space-to-Earth), with the 17.7-17.8 GHz (space-to-Earth) frequency band limited to international service only. We also grant,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1132A1_Rcd.pdf
  • SAT-AMD-20051118-00239 SAT-AMD-20080114-00009 SAT-AMD-20080617-00124 SAT-AMD-20080701-00137 Call Sign: S2661 ORDERAND AUTHORIZATION Adopted: May 26, 2009 Released: May 26, 2009 By the Chief, Satellite Division, International Bureau: I. INTRODUCTION 1. By this Order, we grant Intelsat North America LLC (Intelsat) authority to construct, launch, and operate a 17/24 GHz Broadcasting-Satellite Service (BSS) space station at the 95.15° W.L. orbital location, which is offset 0.15° from the 95° W.L. orbital location specified in Appendix F to the 17/24 GHz Report and Order, at a reduced power and without full interference protection.1Specifically, Intelsat is authorized to use the 24.75-25.25 GHz frequency band (Earth-to-space) and the 17.3-17.8 GHz frequency band (space-to-Earth), with the 17.7-17.8 GHz (space-to-Earth) frequency band limited to international service only. We also grant, in
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1376A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1376A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1376A1.txt
  • = provisionally winning bid amount from the current round Examples C = 0.5, N = 0.1, M = 0.3 Round 1 (1 bidder submitting bids, provisionally winning bid = $1,000,000) 1. Calculation of additional percentage for round 2: A1 = (0.5 * 1) + (0.5 * 0) = 0.5 I2 = The smaller of [((1 + 0.5) * 0.1) = 0.15] and 0.3 (the maximum additional percentage) = 0.15 2. Calculation of dollar amount associated with the additional percentage for round 2 (using I2 from above): X2 = 0.15 * $1,000,000 = $150,000 3. Minimum acceptable bid amount for round 2 = $1,150,000 Round 2 (3 bidders submitting bids, provisionally winning bid = $2,000,000) 1. Calculation of additional percentage for round
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1376A1_Rcd.pdf
  • dollar amount Yi= provisionally winning bid amount from the current round Examples C = 0.5, N = 0.1, M = 0.3 Round 1 (1 bidder submitting bids, provisionally winning bid = $1,000,000) 1. Calculation of additional percentage for round 2: A1= (0.5 * 1) + (0.5 * 0) = 0.5 I2= The smaller of [((1 + 0.5) * 0.1) = 0.15] and 0.3 (the maximum additional percentage) = 0.15 2. Calculation of dollar amount associated with the additional percentage for round 2 (using I2from above): X2= 0.15 * $1,000,000 = $150,000 3. Minimum acceptable bid amount for round 2 = $1,150,000 8347 Federal Communications Commission DA 09-1376 Round 2 (3 bidders submitting bids, provisionally winning bid = $2,000,000) 1. Calculation of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-13A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-13A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-13A1.txt
  • until September 8, 2008, when it achieved compliance. In light of achieving the 95 percent benchmark, SouthernLINC also seeks relief from the reporting requirements imposed in the Waiver Order. discussion SouthernLINC achieved 94.85 percent compliance as of July 28, 2008, and full compliance with the 95 percent benchmark approximately three weeks following its August 15th deadline. We find that the 0.15 percent variance from the 95 percent compliance benchmark coupled with the short delay before SouthernLINC achieved 95 percent compliance constitute a de minimis exception and, as a result, we grant, nunc pro tunc, SouthernLINC's Amended Request for an extension until September 8, 2008. In light of SouthernLINC's achievement of 95% penetration of location-capable handsets, we also amend the previously-imposed reporting
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1624A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1624A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1624A1.txt
  • place additional conditions relating to DIRECTV's international coordination responsibilities on any license. No petitions to deny were filed. Spectrum Five's Challenge to DIRECTV's Application. On November 19, 2008, Spectrum Five filed a petition for declaratory ruling to serve the market in the United States through a 17/24 GHz BSS Netherlands-authorized satellite at the 103.15º W.L. orbital location, which is offset 0.15 degree from the 103º W.L. orbital location, at reduced power and with reduced interference protection. In its petition for market access, Spectrum Five argues that DIRECTV's application at the 102.825º W.L. orbital location must be dismissed or denied as defective because it exceeds the Commission's power flux density (PFD) limits. In particular, Spectrum Five asserts that DIRECTV improperly relied on
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1624A1_Rcd.pdf
  • 09-1624 additional conditions relating to DIRECTV's international coordination responsibilities on any license.9 No petitions to deny were filed. 5.Spectrum Five's Challenge to DIRECTV's Application. On November 19, 2008, Spectrum Five filed a petition for declaratory ruling to serve the market in the United States through a 17/24 GHz BSS Netherlands-authorized satellite at the 103.15º W.L. orbital location, which is offset 0.15 degree from the 103º W.L. orbital location, at reduced power and with reduced interference protection.10In its petition for market access, Spectrum Five argues that DIRECTV's application at the 102.825º W.L. orbital location must be dismissed or denied as defective because it exceeds the Commission's power flux density (PFD) limits.11In particular, Spectrum Five asserts that DIRECTV improperly relied on weather and
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-54A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-54A1.txt
  • per Minute ($) Data (% of ARPU) Receiving Party Pays USA 84.4 16.1 812 0.06 19.8 Canada 60.9 22.1 439 0.11 12.5 Hong Kong 138.3 40.8 510 NA NA Singapore 125.0 46.4 349 0.08 24.5 Calling Party Pays UK 121.7 64.6 185 0.19 26.4 Germany 118.2 55.2 102 0.21 23.3 Italy 152.8 89.5 139 0.18 21.9 Sweden 115.1 50.4 191 0.15 13.0 France 89.0 36.7 249 0.17 15.6 Finland 122.4 19.0 307 0.12 16.8 Japan 82.3 2.0 138 0.26 34.4 South Korea 89.9 3.0 319 0.11 18.6 Australia 104.3 48.0 208 0.16 25.2 Source: Interactive Global Wireless Matrix 4Q07. 219. As noted above, some analysts regard average revenue per minute as a good proxy for mobile pricing.620 Revenue per minute in
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-843A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-843A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-843A1.txt
  • = provisionally winning bid amount from the current round Examples C = 0.5, N = 0.1, M = 0.3 Round 1 (1 bidder submitting bids, provisionally winning bid = $1,000,000) 1. Calculation of additional percentage for round 2: A1 = (0.5 * 1) + (0.5 * 0) = 0.5 I2 = The smaller of [((1 + 0.5) * 0.1) = 0.15] and 0.3 (the maximum additional percentage) = 0.15 2. Calculation of dollar amount associated with the additional percentage for round 2 (using I2 from above): X2 = 0.15 * $1,000,000 = $150,000 3. Minimum acceptable bid amount for round 2 = $1,150,000 Round 2 (3 bidders submitting bids, provisionally winning bid = $2,000,000) 1. Calculation of additional percentage for round
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-843A1_Rcd.pdf
  • dollar amount Yi= provisionally winning bid amount from the current round Examples C = 0.5, N = 0.1, M = 0.3 Round 1 (1 bidder submitting bids, provisionally winning bid = $1,000,000) 1. Calculation of additional percentage for round 2: A1= (0.5 * 1) + (0.5 * 0) = 0.5 I2= The smaller of [((1 + 0.5) * 0.1) = 0.15] and 0.3 (the maximum additional percentage) = 0.15 2. Calculation of dollar amount associated with the additional percentage for round 2 (using I2from above): X2= 0.15 * $1,000,000 = $150,000 3. Minimum acceptable bid amount for round 2 = $1,150,000 4622 C- Round 2 (3 bidders submitting bids, provisionally winning bid = $2,000,000) 1. Calculation of additional percentage for round
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2344A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2344A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2344A1.txt
  • administrative expenses for the first quarter of 2011. Accordingly, the projected demand and expenses are as follows: ($ millions) Program Demand Projected Program Support Admin. Expenses Application Of Interest Income Application of Periodic True-Ups & Prior Period Adjustment Total Program Collection Schools and Libraries 543.31 19.19 (3.88) 43.29 601.91 Rural Health Care 20.52 3.78 (0.47) 0.04 23.87 High-Cost 1,095.84 4.31 (0.15) 126.28 1,226.28 Low Income 370.72 1.73 (0.14) (11.89) 360.42 TOTAL 2,030.39 29.01 (4.64) 157.72 2,212.48 USAC Projections of Industry Revenues USAC submitted projected collected end-user telecommunications revenues for January through March 2011 based on information contained in the First Quarter 2011 Telecommunications Reporting Worksheet (FCC Form 499-Q). The amount is as follows: Total Projected Collected Interstate and International End-User Telecommunications
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-849A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-849A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-849A1.txt
  • = provisionally winning bid amount from the current round Examples C = 0.5, N = 0.1, M = 0.3 Round 1 (1 bidder submitting bids, provisionally winning bid = $1,000,000) 1. Calculation of additional percentage for round 2: A1 = (0.5 * 1) + (0.5 * 0) = 0.5 I2 = The smaller of [((1 + 0.5) * 0.1) = 0.15] and 0.3 (the maximum additional percentage) = 0.15 2. Calculation of dollar amount associated with the additional percentage for round 2 (using I2 from above): X2 = 0.15 * $1,000,000 = $150,000 3. Minimum acceptable bid amount for round 2 = $1,150,000 Round 2 (3 bidders submitting bids, provisionally winning bid = $2,000,000) 1. Calculation of additional percentage for round
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-849A1_Rcd.pdf
  • Yi= provisionally winning bid amount from the current round Examples C = 0.5, N = 0.1, M = 0.3 Round 1 (1 bidder submitting bids, provisionally winning bid = $1,000,000) 1. Calculation of additional percentage for round 2: A1 = (0.5 * 1) + (0.5 * 0) = 0.5 I2 = The smaller of [((1 + 0.5) * 0.1) = 0.15] and 0.3 (the maximum additional percentage) = 0.15 2. Calculation of dollar amount associated with the additional percentage for round 2 (using I2 from above): X2 = 0.15 * $1,000,000 = $150,000 5367 3. Minimum acceptable bid amount for round 2 = $1,150,000 Round 2 (3 bidders submitting bids, provisionally winning bid = $2,000,000) 1. Calculation of additional percentage for
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1454A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1454A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1454A1.txt
  • Carried by DBS DMA DMA Rank State Segment No. of HHs in State Segment % DMA HHs in State Segment Measured by Nielsen Full-Power Stations Only All Full- and Low-Power Stations DISH Network DIRECTV SALISBURY 143 DE 80,500 49.88% 2 1 1.93 0 1 MD 80,900 50.12% 8 4.54 5.67 2 5 SALT LAKE CITY 32 ID 7,600 0.79% 0 0.15 12.54 0 0 NV 21,000 2.17% 1 0.81 10.8 0 0 UT 902,500 93.38% 22 10.67 20.48 15 15 WY 35,400 3.66% 0 0.6 3.78 0 0 SAN ANGELO 196 TX 55,900 100.00% 11 4.07 9.64 4 0 SAN ANTONIO 37 TX 856,600 100.00% 16 13.41 19.24 11 15 SAN DIEGO 28 CA 1,107,700 100.00% 12 9.26 14.8 8 7
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1498A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1498A1.txt
  • SAT-LOA-20090807-00084 E Effective Date: 08/30/2011 Grant of Authority Launch and Operating Authority Pegasus Development DBS Corporation Nature of Service: Other On August 30, 2011, the Satellite Division granted, with conditions, the request of 95 License Subsidiary, LLC for authority to construct, launch, and operate a 17/24 GHz Broadcasting-Satellite Service space station at the 95.15° W.L. orbital location, which is offset 0.15º from the 95º W.L. location specified in Appendix F to the 17/24 GHz BSS Report and Order, FCC 07-76, 22 FCC Rcd 8842 (rel. May 4, 2007). Accordingly, 95 License Sub is authorized to use the 17.3-17.8 GHz (space-to-Earth) and the 24.75-25.25 GHz (Earth-to-space) frequency bands, with the 17.7-17.8 GHz (space-to-Earth) frequency band limited to international service only, at full
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1498A1_Rcd.pdf
  • SAT-LOA-20090807-00084 E Effective Date: 08/30/2011 Grant of Authority Launch and Operating Authority Pegasus Development DBS Corporation Nature of Service: Other On August 30, 2011, the Satellite Division granted, with conditions, the request of 95 License Subsidiary, LLC for authority to construct, launch, and operate a 17/24 GHz Broadcasting-Satellite Service space station at the 95.15° W.L. orbital location, which is offset 0.15º from the 95º W.L. location specified in Appendix F to the 17/24 GHz BSS Report and Order, FCC 07-76, 22 FCC Rcd 8842 (rel. May 4, 2007). Accordingly, 95 License Sub is authorized to use the 17.3-17.8 GHz (space-to-Earth) and the 24.75-25.25 GHz (Earth-to-space) frequency bands, with the 17.7-17.8 GHz (space-to-Earth) frequency band limited to international service only, at full
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-284A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-284A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-284A1.txt
  • 70 $47.86 0.45 70 $43.68 0.42 DBS subgroup Basic service 208 $17.29 0.36 207 $15.78 0.34 Cable programming 208 $36.32 0.47 207 $34.53 0.42 Expanded basic service 208 $53.61 0.27 207 $50.31 0.24 Wireless MVPD subgroup Basic service 31 $18.25 0.20 31 $17.23 0.22 Cable programming 31 $34.09 0.31 31 $32.71 0.29 Expanded basic service 31 $52.34 0.17 31 $49.93 0.15 Low penetration test subgroup Basic service 34 $20.50 1.74 34 $19.38 1.55 Cable programming 34 $30.79 2.04 34 $28.92 1.85 Expanded basic service 34 $51.29 1.09 34 $48.30 0.94 Source: 2009 survey. Attachment 3 Price per Channel Sample Group Video Programming Service January 1, 2008 January 1, 2009 N Mean Std. Error n Mean Std. Error Sample groups overall Basic
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-473A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-473A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-473A1.txt
  • of 2011. Accordingly, the projected demand and expenses are as follows: ($ millions) Program Demand Projected Program Support Admin. Expenses Application Of Interest Income Application of True-Ups & Adjustments Total Program Collection (Revenue Requirement) Schools and Libraries 543.30 19.20 (3.97) 16.29 574.82 Rural Health Care 20.29 3.67 (0.58) (0.48) 22.90 High-Cost 1,098.45 4.46 (0.13) 23.80 1,126.58 Low Income 383.79 2.09 (0.15) (12.39) 373.34 TOTAL 2,045.83 29.42 (4.83) 27.22 2,097.64 USAC Projections of Industry Revenues USAC submitted projected collected end-user telecommunications revenues for April through June 2011 based on information contained in the Second Quarter 2011 Telecommunications Reporting Worksheet (FCC Form 499-Q). The amount is as follows: Total Projected Collected Interstate and International End-User Telecommunications Revenues for Second Quarter 2011: $16.403461 billion.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-732A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-732A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-732A1.txt
  • population is no longer statistically significant, and is fairly small in magnitude. Population density and GDP, however, remain positively correlated with broadband adoption rates at a statistically significant level. More concentrated regions have higher adoption rates, as do regions with higher per-capita incomes (see column 3). A 10% increase in the number of people per square kilometer corresponds to a 0.15 percentage-point increase in the percentage of households with broadband connections, and a 10% increase in per capita GDP corresponds to a 1.53 percentage-point increase in the percentage of households with a broadband connection. Once again, the estimated coefficient on education (when added) is small in magnitude and not statistically different from zero (see column 4). Overall, the regressions explain anywhere
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-732A1_Rcd.pdf
  • population is no longer statistically significant, and is fairly small in magnitude. Population density and GDP, however, remain positively correlated with broadband adoption rates at a statistically significant level. More concentrated regions have higher adoption rates, as do regions with higher per-capita incomes (see column 3). A 10% increase in the number of people per square kilometer corresponds to a 0.15 percentage-point increase in the percentage of households with broadband connections, and a 10% increase in per capita GDP corresponds to a 1.53 percentage-point increase in the percentage of households with a broadband connection. Once again, the estimated coefficient on education (when added) is small in magnitude and not statistically different from zero (see column 4). Overall, the regressions explain anywhere
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-732A3.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-732A3.txt
  • 2.74 2.78 631769.45 666878.05 6904942 6984172 8.37 8.43 8.51 8.62 8.72 210276.96 220744.57 5221310 5313823 21.89 22.18 22.53 22.94 23.35 163102.14 168762.94 4195981 4293915 2.25 2.30 2.36 2.42 2.48 113143.74 123064.28 1585794 1603361 1.56 1.58 1.59 1.61 1.63 44892.29 45696.50 2112967 2171197 0.78 0.80 0.81 0.83 0.86 67044.09 73255.00 493204 497529 7.11 7.16 7.21 7.26 7.33 12546.21 13165.21 214804 219818 0.15 0.15 0.16 0.16 0.16 7438.47 8208.27 341054 345551 139.39 140.53 142.21 145.17 147.08 13325.55 13981.29 8282984 8318592 8355260 97.44 98.19 98.74 99.14 99.33 266408.34 274801.22 280062 281185 283118 75.36 75.74 70.67 70.86 70.98 6205.24 6264.86 1588567 1596538 1605122 82.59 83.23 82.89 83.05 83.25 41605.18 42323.01 1661246 1674909 1687271 4071.97 4138.64 4106.51 4029.43 4045.98 72123.79 74174.61 559393 560322 560605 59.75 59.81
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-121A2_Rcd.pdf
  • 0.33 ME 5,079 134 74 12 7 9,674 9,875 0.53 298.46 8,908.92 458.27 0.09 0.06 0.00 354.58 1.05 MI 13,614 280 161 48 12 44,451 10,080 2.18 480.64 13,688.74 1,584.32 0.90 13.01 1.87 1,466.57 1.99 MN 4,839 155 89 34 11 17,903 8,341 0.00 242.38 5,231.48 551.42 0.00 13.29 0.00 496.81 55.74 MO 9,415 360 192 87 24 50,096 5,394 0.15 659.06 8,734.16 227.17 0.97 0.88 0.54 874.87 63.35 MS 2,904 155 99 52 12 25,156 2,747 1.14 367.79 3,696.64 74.13 0.97 0.32 0.00 343.70 114.59 MT 24,626 204 125 56 12 27,086 53,161 38.64 1,501.54 37,618.87 15,227.06 7.16 7,238.97 7.82 2,960.28 57.89 NC 7,717 420 251 74 23 73,948 3,801 0.68 521.92 6,327.38 338.30 1.61 43.78 0.00 527.54 54.55 ND
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-187A2_Rcd.pdf
  • Number of CMAs with Unserved Blocks Total Population of Unserved Blocks Total Area (square miles) of Unserved Blocks PA 20,201 659 312 51 23 143,698 6,663 3.59 1,532.20 12,636.82 446.54 1.37 17.24 7.55 1,521.81 92.18 RI 11111 26 1 0.00 0.00 1.13 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 SC 1,755 189 122 41 15 16,223 1,133 0.09 162.18 1,826.74 64.62 0.15 1.88 0.00 390.56 2.29 SD 1,279 47 31 26 7 5,216 4,864 0.00 199.23 2,592.62 360.93 0.04 2.78 0.00 204.50 0.87 TN 6,383 342 220 76 13 40,825 2,246 0.23 431.74 3,550.85 376.86 0.49 2.77 0.00 240.06 23.49 TX 37,096 535 335 179 38 118,273 48,413 20.35 2,440.41 79,412.07 3,310.03 8.84 15.51 2.58 5,033.73 17.70 UT 10,413 91 60 28
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-646A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-646A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-646A1.txt
  • LnState PctUnDep Ln Ln Pct Pct Pct Pct Variable Opex Capex Loops Miles Crossings SACs Plant Density Exhanges B edrock36 Difficulty Climate TribalLand ParkLand Urban Alaska Midwest Nor theast LnOpex 1.00 0.88 0.87 0.58 0.70 -0.12 0.04 0.13 0.60 0.05 0.11 0.25 0.08 0.04 0.28 0.03 -0.19 -0.10 LnCapex 0.88 1.00 0.80 0.59 0.69 -0.14 0.32 0.09 0.60 0.06 0.11 0.15 0.0 5 0.02 0.23 -0.03 -0.08 -0.17 LnLoops 0.87 0.80 1.00 0.52 0.67 0.03 -0.13 0.34 0.58 -0.05 0.08 0.14 0. 00 -0.02 0.35 -0.03 -0.13 0.04 LnRoadMiles 0.58 0.59 0.52 1.00 0.94 -0.13 -0.01 -0.51 0.79 0.07 0.13 -0 .05 0.04 0.06 -0.06 -0.02 -0.13 -0.22 LnRoadCrossings 0.70 0.69 0.67 0.94 1.00 -0.12 -0.04 -0.26 0.76 0.06 0.1 4
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-96-672A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-96-672A1.txt
  • PGE CANTV 1U1AL PERCENT 0.0 ^TSS 0^4517 0.077M 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 5.U020 0.9J4S8 0.00000 0.1S574 0.15574 0.00000 0.00000 OJII53 1^3551 0.15576 OJII53 0.00000 16.90032 OJXXMM 0.00000 0.00000 0.077U 0.00000 2J2492 1.16S22 0.00000 0.00000 0.23364 0.00000 OJXXMO OJJ364 0.00000 S-52«I 0.13576 OJ34S8 0.077SS O.OT7U OJ1IS3 OJ77J8 0.00000 OJ)TT« 123364 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 44.7S194 2.9S9SO 0,15576 O.OT78S 0.00000 0.00000 7.I65U- UJ3TM 1J69I6 0.15^76 0.00000 040000 040000 0.00000 040000 0^4517 100.00000 12013 RIOJA CABLE SYSTEM OWNERSHIP INTEREST IN SUB-SEGMENT28 (CAiLCStCMCKT UK AMD MLCIUMI PARTY STA TELIN SETAR OPTUS TELSTRA APTT BELC EBT BTC TLC8 ENTEL CYTA CT SPTT TO FINN TFIN FT DTAC HAWTEL HICTI HTC tPT VSNL BTE TI I DC nu KDO ICT LAT LPTT TM TELMEX NLPTT LAN OS RADIO TELENOR
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-209636A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-209636A1.txt
  • COMMUNICATIONS AND COMPANY, LIMITED PARTNERSHIP Application for Modification Class of Station: Mobile Earth Station Nature of Service:Domestic Mobile-Satellite Service, International Mobile Satellite Service Modification filed to add MSV-1 @ 101 degrees W.L. and MSV-2 @ 106.5 degrees as point of communications. SITE ID: 1 Up to 100,000 full duplex TAMS METs, VARIOUS LOCATION: Mobilacomm Dual-Band Patch / 15x15x2 cm TAM1 0.15 meters ANTENNA ID: SSMSRP1 11.00 dBW BPSK channel using TDMA slots/ tracking & asset management (TAMS) data services / land & maritime satellite services 1646.5000 - 1660.0000 MHz 5K00G7D TDM signaling channel using BPSK/ tracking & asset management (TAMS) data services / land & maritime satellite services 1545.0000 - 1558.5000 MHz 5K00G7D Mobilacomm Helical Whip / 1.5x1.5x25 cm TAM2 0.15
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-209663A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-209663A1.txt
  • Status. Lat. 33 0 34 N. - Lon. 116 58 14 W. 17140 MT. WOODSON ROAD, RAMONA, CA New Station Other Facilities Changes LEAD CALLSIGN: WBS375 File Number Applicant Channel(s) Station City & State BPMDH-20000818DFS TEEWINOT LICENSING, INC. 1 TWIN FALLS, ID Call Sign NEW (307675) Non-Common Carrier Status. Lat. 42 43 54 N. - Lon. 114 25 7 W. 0.15 MI. WSW OF FLAT BUTTE, ID, TWIN FALLS, ID New Station Other Facilities Changes LEAD CALLSIGN: WKR64 251 of 385 2/1/01 3:47 PM Public Notice file:///C|/WINDOWS/Desktop/Mdaa0201.htm File Number Applicant Channel(s) Station City & State BPMDH-20000818DFP TEEWINOT LICENSING, INC. 1 WALLA WALLA, WA Call Sign NEW (307672) Non-Common Carrier Status. Lat. 45 59 19 N. - Lon. 118 10 32 W.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-211434A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-211434A1.txt
  • MOTIENT SERVICES, INC. Application for Modification Class of Station: Mobile Earth Station Nature of Service:Domestic Fixed Satellite Service Modification filed to request authority to operate up to an additional 36,900 half-duplex mobile earth terminals in the lower L-band to provide mobile messaging and multi-mode services to its customers. SITE ID: 1 36,900 Mobile Earth Stations LOCATION: to be determined 1 0.15 meters ANTENNA ID: TO BE DETERMINED 1530.0000 - 1559.0000 MHz 1K20G1D 1530.0000 - 1559.0000 MHz 2K4OG1D 1530.0000 - 1559.0000 MHz 4K80G1D 1530.0000 - 1559.0000 MHz 9K60G1D 14.00 dBW 1626.5000 - 1660.5000 MHz 1K20G1D 17.00 dBW 1626.5000 - 1660.5000 MHz 2K40G1D 20.00 dBW 1626.5000 - 1660.5000 MHz 4K80G1D 23.00 dBW 1626.5000 - 1660.5000 MHz 9K60G1D Page 6 of 9 VISTAR TELECOMMUNICATIONS,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-215526A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-215526A1.txt
  • 0.21 6.16 07/01/96 06/30/97 0.72 0.89 1.95 0.17 6.04 07/01/97 12/31/97 0.64 0.84 1.63 0.14 5.18 01/01/98 06/30/98 0.68 0.23 1.29 0.21 4.04 07/01/98 12/31/98 0.91 0.20 0.99 0.30 3.82 01/01/99 06/30/99 0.82 0.16 0.98 0.32 3.71 07/01/99 12/31/99 0.37 0.10 0.86 0.28 2.82 01/01/00 06/30/00 0.32 0.10 0.86 0.31 2.85 08/11/00 06/31/004/ 0.23 0.07 0.52 0.26 1.91 07/01/01 12/31/02 0.15 0.07 0.48 0.24 1.71 Source: Industry Analysis Division, Monitoring Report and access tariff filings. 4/ Although the charges took effect on July 1, 2000, some companies made adjustments to the tariffs which did not take effect until August 11, 2000. 1/ This table shows average rates (weighted by minutes of use) for all local exchange carriers (LECs) that file access
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-222413A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-222413A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-222413A1.txt
  • Date: 05/03/2002 Licensee Name: KM TELEVISION OF FLAGSTAFF, L.L.C. Requested Facility: Ch No:32 N Latitude: 35-14-26; W Longitude: 111-35-48 ERP (Average): 1 kW; HAAT: 597 meters; Antenna: ND Facility ID: 59363 Call Sign: KNIN-DT File No: BDSTA-20020422ABD City: CALDWELL State: ID Grant Date: 05/06/2002 Licensee Name: BANKS-BOISE, INC. Requested Facility: Ch No:10 N Latitude: 43-45-18; W Longitude: 116-5-52 ERP (Average): 0.15 kW; HAAT: 768 meters; Antenna: DA Facility ID: 47401 Call Sign: WTKR-DT File No: BMDSTA-20020423ABL City: NORFOLK State: VA Grant Date: 05/03/2002 Licensee Name: NEW YORK TIMES MANAGEMENT SERVICES Requested Facility: Ch No:40 N Latitude: 36-48-31; W Longitude: 76-30-13 ERP (Average): 724 kW; HAAT: 377 meters; Antenna: ND Facility ID: 72064 Call Sign: WFMY-DT File No: BDSTA-20020423ABM City: GREENSBORO State:
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-225852A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-225852A1.txt
  • E.L. Intelsat plans to start the relocation of the INTELSAT 804 satellite in October/November 2002 and arrive at the 176.0º E.L. orbital location in November/December 2002. Special Temporary Authority PanAmSat Licensee Corp. GAL-3R SAT-STA-20020815-00148E PanAmSat Licensee Corp. has filed a request for special temporary authority for up to 180 days, commencing on August 25, 2002, to relocate Galaxy III-R by 0.15 degrees, from 95.0° W.L., its regularly assigned orbital location, to 95.15° W.L. Page 1 of 1
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-226838A10.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-226838A10.txt
  • use this index as a determinant of lack of diversity. While Dominick and Pearce allowed us to evaluate concentration within the top three categories of programming, HHI goes one step further by taking into account all program types on the schedule. The following chart provides the Herfindahl indices for the years being studied. Figure 3 Herfindahl Index 0 0.05 0.1 0.15 0.2 0.25 196619671968196919701971197219731974 19891990199119921993199419951996199719981999200020012002 Year Lower Data Points = Greater Diversity Herfindahl Index As with the Dominick index, the 1970s showed a marked decline in program diversity on the networks suggesting a strong concentration of programming into a few program types. The HHI follows the same pattern as the Dominick Pearce index. The pattern is consistent ­ after the rules
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-226838A8.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-226838A8.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-226838A8.txt
  • May-00 143 57.96 64.25 65.97 68.84 Jul-00 143 51.71 64.34 63.11 Nov-00 143 55.78 61.30 63.90 66.82 Feb-01 143 56.22 62.51 65.35 68.20 May-01 143 55.45 61.21 63.15 66.17 Jul-01 143 49.06 49.57 61.41 Table 4: Radio Formats, 1993 & 1997 1993 1997 N % N % Adult Contemp (AC) 462 8.44 AC 418 6.62 AC/Album Oriented Rock (AOR) 8 0.15 AC/AOR 4 0.06 AC/ Contemp. Hit Radio (CHR) 10 0.18 AC/CHR 128 2.03 AC/Full Service (FS) 1 0.02 AC/NR 42 0.67 AC/Oldies (O) 5 0.09 AC/SAC 8 0.13 AOR 565 10.32 AOR 375 5.94 AOR/AC 5 0.09 AOR/AC 3 0.05 Black (B) 281 5.13 AOR/NR 200 3.17 B/AC 13 0.24 AOR/P 80 1.27 B/Gospel (G) 4 0.07 B 236 3.74
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-226883A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-226883A1.txt
  • W.L., licensed by Canada, and MSAT-2 at 101 degs., W.L., licensed by the United States. These METs are currently authorized to operate with both MSAT-1 and MSAT-2, but only in the upper L-band (1545 - 1559 MHz; 1646.5 - 1660.5 MHz). SITE ID: 1 Up to 100,000 full duplex TAMS METs, VARIOUS LOCATION: Mobilacomm Dual-Band Patch / 15x15x2 cm TAM1 0.15 meters ANTENNA ID: SSMSRP1 11.00 dBW BPSK channel using TDMA slots/ tracking & asset management (TAMS) data services / land & maritime satellite services 1626.5000 - 1660.5000 MHz 5K00G7D TDM signaling channel using BPSK/ tracking & asset management (TAMS) data services / land & maritime satellite services 1525.0000 - 1559.0000 MHz 5K00G7D Mobilacomm Helical Whip / 1.5x1.5x25 cm TAM2 0.15
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-228584A3.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-228584A3.txt
  • 10,091 31,408 4,462 0.38 0.29 0.51 1.65 7 15 15 15 15Taiwan 1,768 29,087 1 30,856 14,175 0.06 0.12 0.29 0.70 1 16 13 12 6Sweden 3,177 19,414 3,182 25,773 1,109 0.14 0.18 0.49 0.28 3 17 19 14 14Switzerland 4,586 20,842 0 25,428 1,711 0.22 0.45 0.30 1.43 6 18 14 9 11Hong Kong 2,783 15,166 3,193 21,142 8,113 0.15 0.11 0.11 0.26 1 19 26 20 n.a .India 1,993 10,888 0 12,881 1,555 0.18 0.40 0.46 1.40 7 20 20 19 13Philippines 6,588 5,675 2 12,265 3,611 1.16 1.11 1.59 2.17 6 21 22 n.a . n.a .New Zealand 1,786 3,418 6,110 11,314 2,642 0.19 0.13 1.63 2.16 7 22 23 21 16Venezuela 2,016 5,157 3,855 11,028 20,536 0.22
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-232865A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-232865A1.txt
  • W.L.) 1 - MSAT-1 - (106.5 W.L.) Application for Modification 09/25/2000 - 09/25/2010 Date Effective: 03/28/2003 Class of Station: Mobile Earth Station Grant of Authority MOBILE SATELLITE VENTURES SUBSIDIARY LLC E990133 SES-MOD-20020906-01535P Nature of Service:Domestic Mobile-Satellite Service, International Mobile Satellite Service SITE ID: 1 Up to 100,000 full duplex TAMS METs, VARIOUS LOCATION: Mobilacomm Dual-Band Patch / 15x15x2 cm TAM1 0.15 meters ANTENNA ID: SSMSRP1 11.00 dBW BPSK channel using TDMA slots/ tracking & asset management (TAMS) data services / land & maritime satellite services 1626.5000 - 1660.5000 MHz 5K00G7D TDM signaling channel using BPSK/ tracking & asset management (TAMS) data services / land & maritime satellite services 1525.0000 - 1559.0000 MHz 5K00G7D Mobilacomm Helical Whip / 1.5x1.5x25 cm TAM2 0.15
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-234180A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-234180A1.txt
  • transmission rate of 3375 bps 1626.5000 - 1660.5000 MHz 5K00G7W Page 9 of 20 TDM signaling channel using differentially encoded QPSK at a transmission rate of 3375 bps (GC-S-data) 1525.0000 - 1559.0000 MHz 5K00G7W FDMA communications channel (voice or data) using differentially encoded QPSK at a transmission rate of 3375 bps 1525.0000 - 1559.0000 MHz 5K00G7W CAL / Calquest A12 0.15 meters ANTENNA ID: CQ100 16.50 dBW TDMA signaling channel using differentially encoded QPSK at a transmission rate of 3375 bps (MT-ST-data) 1626.5000 - 1660.5000 MHz 5K00G7W 16.50 dBW Slotted Aloha signaling channel using differentially encoded QPSK at a transmission rate of 3375 bps (MT-SR-data) 1626.5000 - 1660.5000 MHz 5K00G7W 16.50 dBW FDMA communications channel (voice or data) using differentially encoded
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-240876A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-240876A1.txt
  • two common Little Smart packages with three common mobile packages. China's mobile operators historically used a mobile-party- pays regime, but the advent of Little Smart services with a calling-party-pays regime has increased pressure on mobile operators to also shift to calling-party-pays. Wireless Telephony Price Packages Calling Party Pays (CPP), Mobile Party Pays (MPP) 25 35 35 50 40 0.6 0.2 0.15 0.2 0.4 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 Little Smart 1 (CPP) Little Smart 2 (CPP) Mobile A: China Mobile/Unicom local plan (MPP) Mobile B: China Mobile national plan (MPP) Mobile 3: Unicom national plan (MPP) Yuan pe r mo nth 0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 Yua n p er m inu te Monthly fee Usage
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-242532A8.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-242532A8.txt
  • 124,922 22,637 0.20 0.18 0.12 0.37 8 7 5 7 6Australia 9,292 43,344 55,242 107,878 41,677 0.09 0.06 0.09 0.11 1 8 n.a. 27 19Denmark 4,979 831 89,309 95,119 87,501 0.06 0.23 0.24 0.46 1 9 17 19 14Switzerland 3,912 72,353 0 76,265 2,125 0.05 0.22 0.45 0.30 7 10 18 14 9Hong Kong 2,553 18,588 51,629 72,770 4,403 0.04 0.15 0.11 0.11 7 11 10 12 13Singapore 1,990 55,576 6,344 63,910 4,744 0.03 0.03 0.04 0.10 7 12 9 10 18China 1,585 52,979 245 54,809 85,937 0.03 0.03 0.06 0.45 7 13 8 8 10Korea, South 3,037 36,700 1,261 40,998 27,085 0.08 0.05 0.08 0.29 1 14 n.a. n.a. n.a.Austria 387 39,021 0 39,408 229 0.01 0.20 3.26 2.99 1
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-247885A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-247885A1.txt
  • rate of 3375 bps (MT-ST-data) 1626.0000 - 1660.0000 MHz 5K00G7W Page 6 of 13 FDMA communications channel (voice or data) using differentially encoded QPSK at a transmission rate of 3375 bps 1525.0000 - 1559.0000 MHz 5K00G7W TDM signaling channel using differentially encoded QPSK at a transmission rate of 3375 bps (GC-S-data) 1525.0000 - 1559.0000 MHz 5K00G7W CAL / Calquest A12 0.15 meters ANTENNA ID: CQ100 16.50 dBW FDMA communications channel (voice or data) using differentially encoded QPSK at a transmission rate of 3375 bps 1626.0000 - 1660.0000 MHz 5K00G7W 16.50 dBW Slotted Aloha signaling channel using differentially encoded QPSK at a transmission rate of 3375 bps (MT-SR-data) 1626.0000 - 1660.0000 MHz 5K00G7W 16.50 dBW TDMA signaling channel using differentially encoded QPSK
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-248146A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-248146A1.txt
  • QPSK at a transmission rate of 3375 bps (MT-ST-data) 1626.5000 - 16600.5000 MHz 5K00G7W FDMA communications channel (voice or data) using differentially encoded QPSK at a transmission rate of 3375 bps 1626.5000 - 16600.5000 MHz 5K00G7W TDM signaling channel using differentially encoded QPSK at a transmission rate of 3375 bps (GC-S-data) 1626.5000 - 16600.5000 MHz 5K00G7W CAL / Calquest A12 0.15 meters ANTENNA ID: CQ100 16.50 dBW FDMA communications channel (voice or data) using differentially encoded QPSK at a transmission rate of 3375 bps 1626.5000 - 16600.5000 MHz 5K00G7W 16.50 dBW Slotted Aloha signaling channel using differentially encoded QPSK at a transmission rate of 3375 bps (MT-SR-data) 1626.5000 - 16600.5000 MHz 5K00G7W 16.50 dBW TDMA signaling channel using differentially encoded QPSK
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-249262A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-249262A1.txt
  • 0.39 0.40 1995 15,888.8 14,335.4 7,569.0 6,766.4 7,050.6 2,464.1 0.90 0.48 0.43 0.35 0.40 1996 19,325.1 14,597.8 8,252.3 6,345.5 8,293.2 2,450.9 0.76 0.43 0.33 0.30 0.32 1997 22,753.1 15,661.6 8,031.0 7,630.5 9,170.0 2,458.9 0.69 0.35 0.34 0.27 0.32 1998 24,249.9 14,726.3 7,021.7 7,704.5 10,198.5 2,158.2 0.61 0.29 0.32 0.21 0.29 1999 28,515.4 14,980.3 6,383.1 8,597.3 10,765.0 1,576.0 0.53 0.22 0.30 0.15 0.26 2000 30,134.8 14,908.8 5,536.0 9,372.8 12,888.2 1,447.6 0.49 0.18 0.31 0.11 0.25 2001 33,286.8 11,379.6 4,526.2 6,853.5 13,478.0 1,118.4 0.34 0.14 0.21 0.08 0.17 2002 35,988.3 9,956 3,872.9 6,083.6 13,676.8 738.0 0.28 0.11 0.17 0.05 0.14 See notes at the end of the tables. Table 3 Selected Traffic Statistics for International Telephone Service 1/ (Revenues, Payouts, Receipts and Minutes
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-250829A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-250829A1.txt
  • QPSK at a transmission rate of 3375 bps (MT-ST-data) 1626.5000 - 1660.5000 MHz 5K00G7W FDMA communications channel (voice or data) using differentially encoded QPSK at a transmission rate of 3375 bps 1626.5000 - 1660.5000 MHz 5K00G7W TDM signaling channel using differentially encoded QPSK at a transmission rate of 3375 bps (GC-S-data) 1626.5000 - 1660.5000 MHz 5K00G7W CAL / Calquest A12 0.15 meters ANTENNA ID: CQ100 16.50 dBW FDMA communications channel (voice or data) using differentially encoded QPSK at a transmission rate of 3375 bps 1626.5000 - 1660.5000 MHz 5K00G7W 16.50 dBW Slotted Aloha signaling channel using differentially encoded QPSK at a transmission rate of 3375 bps (MT-SR-data) 1626.5000 - 1660.5000 MHz 5K00G7W 16.50 dBW TDMA signaling channel using differentially encoded QPSK
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-255869A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-255869A1.txt
  • people shift between cable and DBS), and/or consumer demand for those characteristics. We attempt to interpret the results in light of this duality. 16 TABLE 1 FIRST SPECIFICATION: DBS PENETRATION AND FULL INDUSTRY QUALITY-ADJUSTED CABLE PRICE THE FULL MODEL REGRESSION COEFFICIENTS AND GOODNESS OF FIT STATISTICS (t-statistics in parentheses) First Stage Variable Estimated Coefficient t Statistic LPREM -0.08*** (4.91) CABINT -0.15*** (4.98) CABREGSPORT -0.09** (3.02) CABFOREIGN -0.04 (1.30) CABHIDEF 0.00 (0.05) LNOVERAIR 0.06* (1.78) LNLAT 0.25*** (3.19) LPOVERTY 0.01 (0.83) LMULTDWELL -0.00 (0.01) DBSOVERAIR -0.04 (1.56) OVERBUILD -0.06 (1.09) CABVERTINT26 0.09*** (4.33) LCABSUBSYS -0.01 (1.25) Constant -0.68 (2.07) Observations 525 Centered R-Squared 0.38 Shea Partial R-Squared 0.0427 F-Statistic Test of Excluded Instruments 7.67*** F-Statistic 14.35*** Second Stage Variable Estimated Coefficient t
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-261024A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-261024A2.txt
  • 6,384.9 2,501.8 0.92 0.51 0.41 0.39 0.40 199515,888.8 14,335.4 7,569.0 6,766.4 7,050.6 2,464.1 0.90 0.48 0.43 0.35 0.40 199619,325.1 14,597.8 8,252.3 6,345.5 8,293.2 2,450.9 0.76 0.43 0.33 0.30 0.32 199722,753.1 15,661.6 8,031.0 7,630.5 9,170.0 2,458.9 0.69 0.35 0.34 0.27 0.32 199824,249.9 14,726.3 7,021.7 7,704.5 10,198.5 2,158.2 0.61 0.29 0.32 0.21 0.29 199928,515.4 14,980.3 6,383.1 8,597.3 10,765.0 1,576.0 0.53 0.22 0.30 0.15 0.26 200030,134.8 14,908.8 5,536.0 9,372.8 12,888.2 1,447.6 0.49 0.18 0.31 0.11 0.25 200133,286.8 11,379.6 4,526.2 6,853.5 13,478.0 1,118.4 0.34 0.14 0.21 0.08 0.17 200235,988.3 9,956 3,872.9 6,083.6 13,676.8 738.0 0.28 0.11 0.17 0.05 0.14 200342,664.3 8,977 3,649.3 5,294.3 15,674.0 669.3 0.21 0.09 0.12 0.04 0.10 See notes at the end of the tables. U.S. Billed Amounts Table 3 Selected Traffic
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-261167A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-261167A1.txt
  • Points of Communication: 1 - PERMITTED LIST - () E900081 SES-MOD-20050901-01211E Class of Station: Mobile Earth Station Application for Modification Mobile Satellite Ventures Subsidiary LLC Nature of Service:Domestic Land Mobile-Satellite Service, Mobile Satellite Service Modification filed to convert the regulatory status from common carrier to non-common carrier. SITE ID: 1 30,000 Mobile Earth Stations, CONUS LOCATION: to be determined 1 0.15 meters ANTENNA ID: TO BE DETERMINED 14.00 dBW 1626.5000 - 1645.5000 MHz 1K20G1D 17.00 dBW 1626.5000 - 1645.5000 MHz 2K40G1D 20.00 dBW 1626.5000 - 1645.5000 MHz 4K80G1D 23.00 dBW 1626.5000 - 1645.5000 MHz 9K60G1D 1530.0000 - 1544.0000 MHz 1K20G1D 1530.0000 - 1544.0000 MHz 2K4OG1D 1530.0000 - 1544.0000 MHz 4K80G1D 1530.0000 - 1544.0000 MHz 9K60G1D to be determined 2 0.4 meters
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262700A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262700A1.txt
  • Voice and data services 1525.0000 - 1559.0000 MHz 12K5G7W Voice and data services 1525.0000 - 1559.0000 MHz 200KG7W Voice and data services 1525.0000 - 1559.0000 MHz 50K0G7W NERA 3 0.125 meters ANTENNA ID: NERA PUT 11.00 dBW Voice and data services 1626.5000 - 1660.5000 MHz 200KG7W 11.00 dBW Voice and data services 1626.5000 - 1660.5000 MHz 25K0G7W Add Value 4 0.15 meters ANTENNA ID: Add Value PUT Voice and data services 1525.0000 - 1559.0000 MHz 12K5G7W Page 2 of 29 Voice and data services 1525.0000 - 1559.0000 MHz 200KG7W Voice and data services 1525.0000 - 1559.0000 MHz 50K0G7W Add Value 4 0.15 meters ANTENNA ID: Add Value PUT 11.00 dBW Voice and data services 1626.5000 - 1660.5000 MHz 200KG7W 11.00 dBW
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262833A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262833A1.txt
  • amendment filed at the request of International Bureau staff to an application seeking to modify mobile earth station license Call Sign E900081 to convert the regulatory status from common carrier to non-common carrier. No other changes are being made to the license and all technical parameters shall remain the same. SITE ID: 1 30,000 Mobile Earth Stations, CONUS LOCATION: 1 0.15 meters ANTENNA ID: 14.00 dBW 1626.5000 - 1645.5000 MHz 1K20G1D 17.00 dBW 1626.5000 - 1645.5000 MHz 2K40G1D 20.00 dBW 1626.5000 - 1645.5000 MHz 4K80G1D 23.00 dBW 1626.5000 - 1645.5000 MHz 9K60G1D 1530.0000 - 1544.0000 MHz 1K20G1D 1530.0000 - 1544.0000 MHz 2K4OG1D 1530.0000 - 1544.0000 MHz 4K80G1D Page 1 of 17 1530.0000 - 1544.0000 MHz 9K60G1D 2 0.4 meters ANTENNA ID:
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A1.txt
  • Allocation Alabama 2,315,088 1.09% 0.58% 0.96% $128 $167 Alaska NA NA NA NA NA NA American Samoa NA NA NA NA NA NA Arizona 1,192,211 0.56 1.17 0.72 95 124 Arkansas 1,556,172 0.74 1.07 0.82 109 141 California 41,051,257 19.40 17.41 18.90 2,514 3,264 Colorado 1,661,611 0.79 1.07 0.86 114 148 Connecticut 1,310,541 0.62 0.57 0.61 81 105 Delaware 318,919 0.15 0.07 0.13 18 23 District of Columbia 1 0.00 0.02 0.00 1 1 Florida 11,381,404 5.38 7.70 5.96 793 1,029 Georgia 4,371,379 2.07 1.75 1.99 264 343 Guam NA NA NA NA NA NA Hawaii 337,463 0.16 0.42 0.22 30 39 Idaho 416,870 0.20 0.41 0.25 33 43 Illinois 4,959,073 2.34 3.60 2.66 353 459 Indiana 3,927,153 1.86 2.18 1.94
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A13.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A13.txt
  • 0.03 Verizon - Contel - California CA 34,105 31,405 3,364 0.10 Verizon - NW - West Coast California CA 1,636 1,183 672 0.41 Verizon - GTE - California CA 341,394 320,436 391,254 1.15 SBC - Pacific Bell - California CA (1,540,357) (1,603,300) 314,633 (0.20) Sure/West/Roseville Tel - California CA 6,849 5,150 3,330 0.49 Qwest - Colorado CO 345,385 316,495 51,131 0.15 SBC - SNET - CT CT 24,331 19,708 94,951 3.90 Verizon - Delaware DE 25,285 23,063 13,507 0.53 Verizon - District of Columbia DC (114,847) (118,051) 26,361 (0.23) Verizon - Florida FL 49,958 37,941 91,991 1.84 BellSouth - Florida FL 127,901 111,380 209,919 1.64 Sprint - Florida FL 77,839 58,883 24,018 0.31 ALLTEL Georgia Communications GA 10,288 7,547 4,248 0.41
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A3.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A3.txt
  • Allocation Alabama 2,315,088 1.09% 0.58% 0.96% $128 $167 Alaska NA NA NA NA NA NA American Samoa NA NA NA NA NA NA Arizona 1,192,211 0.56 1.17 0.72 95 124 Arkansas 1,556,172 0.74 1.07 0.82 109 141 California 41,051,257 19.40 17.41 18.90 2,514 3,264 Colorado 1,661,611 0.79 1.07 0.86 114 148 Connecticut 1,310,541 0.62 0.57 0.61 81 105 Delaware 318,919 0.15 0.07 0.13 18 23 District of Columbia 1 0.00 0.02 0.00 1 1 Florida 11,381,404 5.38 7.70 5.96 793 1,029 Georgia 4,371,379 2.07 1.75 1.99 264 343 Guam NA NA NA NA NA NA Hawaii 337,463 0.16 0.42 0.22 30 39 Idaho 416,870 0.20 0.41 0.25 33 43 Illinois 4,959,073 2.34 3.60 2.66 353 459 Indiana 3,927,153 1.86 2.18 1.94
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A5.txt
  • 3.47 Kansas 3.26 0.03 0.00 0.29 1.42 0.38 0.67 6.06 Kentucky 0.69 0.01 0.62 0.10 0.47 0.64 0.18 2.70 Louisiana 1.92 0.00 0.00 0.31 0.58 0.34 0.22 3.39 Maine 0.76 0.00 0.18 0.28 0.69 0.03 0.70 2.64 Maryland 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.03 0.01 0.06 Massachusetts 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.02 0.01 0.04 Michigan 0.31 0.00 0.00 0.08 0.15 0.01 0.12 0.66 Minnesota 0.75 0.02 0.00 0.22 0.83 0.12 0.56 2.50 Mississippi 0.81 0.00 5.67 0.11 0.28 0.74 0.14 7.75 Missouri 1.00 0.01 0.00 0.12 0.50 0.34 0.17 2.13 Montana 4.05 0.03 2.69 0.81 2.08 0.18 1.51 11.34 Nebraska 1.27 0.08 0.38 0.19 0.97 0.46 0.96 4.31 Nevada 0.38 0.01 0.00 0.03 0.24 0.62 0.44 1.72 New Hampshire 0.07
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A9.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A9.txt
  • and International International All Interstate Switched Services Switched ServicesSwitched ServicesSwitched Services 1984 $0.32 NA NA NA 1985 0.31 NA NA NA 1986 0.28 NA NA NA 1987 0.25 NA NA NA 1988 0.23 NA NA NA 1989 0.22 NA NA NA 1990 0.20 NA NA NA 1991 0.20 NA NA NA 1992 0.19 $0.19 $1.01 $0.15 1993 0.19 0.19 1.02 0.15 1994 0.18 0.18 0.93 0.14 1995 NA 0.17 0.91 0.12 1996 NA 0.16 0.76 0.12 1997 NA 0.15 0.69 0.11 1998 NA 0.14 0.58 0.11 1999 NA 0.14 0.54 0.11 2000 NA 0.12 0.52 0.09 2001 NA 0.10 0.35 0.08 2002 NA 0.09 0.28 0.07 2003 NA 0.08 0.20 0.07 NA - Not available. Note: Data for some prior years
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-263564A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-263564A1.txt
  • GeoLogic Solutions, Inc. Nature of Service:Mobile Satellite Service Page 14 of 20 This application seeks to modify the license term of satellite earth station E900081 to permit GeoLogic to operate its authorized half-duplex METs for an additional four years, until July 2, 2010. SITE ID: 1 50,100 Mobile Earth Stations half duplex data METs, CONUS LOCATION: to be determined 1 0.15 meters ANTENNA ID: TO BE DETERMINED 14.00 dBW 1626.5000 - 1645.5000 MHz 1K20G1D 17.00 dBW 1626.5000 - 1645.5000 MHz 2K40G1D 20.00 dBW 1626.5000 - 1645.5000 MHz 4K80G1D 23.00 dBW 1626.5000 - 1645.5000 MHz 9K60G1D 1530.0000 - 1544.0000 MHz 1K20G1D 1530.0000 - 1544.0000 MHz 2K4OG1D 1530.0000 - 1544.0000 MHz 4K80G1D 1530.0000 - 1544.0000 MHz 9K60G1D to be determined 2 0.4 meters
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-265809A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-265809A1.txt
  • Mobile Earth Station Grant of Authority 01/21/2002 - 07/02/2010 Application for Modification GeoLogic Solutions, Inc. Nature of Service:Mobile Satellite Service License granted with conditions by Order and Authorization, DA 06-1179, released May 31, 2006. SITE ID: 1 50,100 half-duplex METs in CONUS, AK, HI PR, USVI & coastal areas up to 200 miles, offshore LOCATION: Rockwell Collins, Trimble Navigation 1 0.15 meters ANTENNA ID: Pro-2000, Galaxy7003 17.00 dBW Mobile messaging service and multi-mod mobile messaging service 1626.5000 - 1645.5000 MHz 2K40G1D 23.00 dBW Mobile messaging service and multi-mod mobile messaging service 1626.5000 - 1645.5000 MHz 9K60G1D Mobile messaging service and multi-mod mobile messaging service 1530.0000 - 1544.0000 MHz 1K20G1D Mobile messaging service and multi-mod mobile messaging service 1530.0000 - 1544.0000 MHz
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-266857A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-266857A1.txt
  • 14.12 0.10 46.16 3.45 Table 1.3 Residential Telephone Rates in the Sample Cities 1 (As of October 15, 2005) Daytime Call Plan State City Monthly Telephone Rate Including Touch-Tone, Cost of a Connection Charges Least-Cost Telephone Surcharges, and Taxes Five-Minute Including Touch-Tone, Inside Wiring Company Flat-Rate Measured/Message Same-Zone Surcharges, and Taxes Maintenance Service Service New Mexico Alamogordo Qwest 23.95 15.22 0.15 32.27 4.75 New York Binghamton Verizon 31.07 18.40 0.09 63.18 2.35 New York Buffalo Verizon 35.16 18.76 0.09 64.42 2.35 New York Massena Verizon 29.16 18.24 0.09 62.63 2.35 New York New York City Verizon 32.50 19.56 0.09 64.53 2.35 New York Ogdensburg Verizon 29.92 18.72 0.09 64.28 2.35 New York Rochester Frontier 20.07 12.89 0.08 33.32 3.95 North Carolina
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A1.txt
  • 1.80 84 116 151 191 North Dakota * 50,668 0.18 8 11 15 19 N. Mariana Islands NA NA NA NA NA NA NA Ohio 979,885 NA 3.06 144 196 257 325 Oklahoma 242,737 NA 0.76 36 49 64 81 Oregon 267,121 NA 0.83 39 54 70 89 Pennsylvania 1,706,036 NA 5.33 250 342 448 566 Puerto Rico * 42,299 0.15 7 9 12 16 Rhode Island 213,787 NA 0.67 31 43 56 71 South Carolina 226,284 NA 0.71 33 45 59 75 South Dakota * 44,325 0.15 7 10 13 16 Tennessee 475,312 NA 1.48 70 95 125 158 Texas 2,320,273 NA 7.24 340 465 609 770 Utah 288,009 NA 0.90 42 58 76 96 Vermont * 37,486 0.13 6
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A13.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A13.txt
  • - United Telephone Company of Texas TX 19 16 3 15.79 Valor Telecommunications of Texas - Texas TX (14,736) (14,733) (1) 0.01 Qwest - Utah UT 55,606 55,728 (121) (0.22) Verizon New England - Vermont VT (9,078) (8,959) (119) 1.31 Sprint - Central Telephone Company of Virginia VA (100) (77) (23) 23.00 Verizon South - Contel/Virginia VA (11,906) (11,888) (18) 0.15 Verizon Virginia VA (77,517) (76,339) (1,178) 1.52 Verizon South - Virginia VA (916) (916) 0 0.00 Sprint - United Telephone Co. - Southeast - Virginia VA (17) (13) (4) 23.53 CenturyTel of Washington WA 459 407 52 11.33 Verizon Northwest - Contel/Washington WA (622) (595) (27) 4.34 Verizon - Northwest - Washington WA (6,694) (6,644) (50) 0.75 Qwest - Washington
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A3.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A3.txt
  • 1.80 84 116 151 191 North Dakota * 50,668 0.18 8 11 15 19 N. Mariana Islands NA NA NA NA NA NA NA Ohio 979,885 NA 3.06 144 196 257 325 Oklahoma 242,737 NA 0.76 36 49 64 81 Oregon 267,121 NA 0.83 39 54 70 89 Pennsylvania 1,706,036 NA 5.33 250 342 448 566 Puerto Rico * 42,299 0.15 7 9 12 16 Rhode Island 213,787 NA 0.67 31 43 56 71 South Carolina 226,284 NA 0.71 33 45 59 75 South Dakota * 44,325 0.15 7 10 13 16 Tennessee 475,312 NA 1.48 70 95 125 158 Texas 2,320,273 NA 7.24 340 465 609 770 Utah 288,009 NA 0.90 42 58 76 96 Vermont * 37,486 0.13 6
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A5.txt
  • 1.28 Texas 0.70 0.00 0.00 0.00 (0.00) 0.45 0.27 0.13 1.56 Utah 0.52 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.67 0.18 0.29 1.67 Vermont 1.23 0.00 0.00 1.66 0.00 1.52 0.39 0.87 5.67 Virgin Islands 17.23 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 9.82 0.00 0.00 27.05 Virginia 0.05 (0.00) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.12 1.04 0.09 1.30 Washington 0.48 0.00 0.00 0.00 (0.00) 0.43 0.61 0.15 1.66 West Virginia 1.01 0.01 0.00 1.72 0.00 0.14 1.28 0.16 4.33 Wisconsin 0.67 0.03 0.08 0.00 0.01 1.22 0.01 0.56 2.57 Wyoming 3.25 0.04 0.00 3.07 0.00 2.56 1.55 1.65 12.11 Industry $0.53 $0.01 $0.00 $0.13 ($0.00) $0.51 $0.30 $0.18 $1.66 Based on 2005 support payments and reported ILEC loops and CETC loops or lines from USAC filing for
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A9.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A9.txt
  • and International International All Interstate Switched Services Switched ServicesSwitched ServicesSwitched Services 1984 $0.32 NA NA NA 1985 0.31 NA NA NA 1986 0.28 NA NA NA 1987 0.25 NA NA NA 1988 0.23 NA NA NA 1989 0.22 NA NA NA 1990 0.20 NA NA NA 1991 0.20 NA NA NA 1992 0.19 $0.19 $1.01 $0.15 1993 0.19 0.19 1.02 0.15 1994 0.18 0.18 0.93 0.14 1995 NA 0.17 0.91 0.12 1996 NA 0.16 0.76 0.12 1997 NA 0.15 0.69 0.11 1998 NA 0.14 0.58 0.11 1999 NA 0.14 0.54 0.11 2000 NA 0.12 0.52 0.09 2001 NA 0.10 0.35 0.08 2002 NA 0.09 0.28 0.07 2003 NA 0.08 0.20 0.07 2004 NA 0.08 0.14 0.06 NA - Not available. Note:
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-270407A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-270407A1.txt
  • 0.21 6.16 07/01/96 06/30/97 0.72 0.89 1.95 0.17 6.04 07/01/97 12/31/97 0.64 0.84 1.63 0.14 5.18 01/01/98 06/30/98 0.68 0.23 1.29 0.21 4.04 07/01/98 12/31/98 0.91 0.20 0.99 0.30 3.82 01/01/99 06/30/99 0.82 0.16 0.98 0.32 3.71 07/01/99 12/31/99 0.37 0.10 0.86 0.28 2.82 01/01/00 06/30/00 0.32 0.10 0.86 0.31 2.85 08/11/00 06/31/004 0.23 0.07 0.52 0.26 1.91 07/01/01 12/31/01 0.15 0.07 0.48 0.24 1.71 01/01/02 06/30/02 0.15 0.07 0.47 0.24 1.69 07/01/02 06/30/03 0.02 0.01 0.48 0.22 1.46 07/01/03 06/30/04 0.00 0.00 0.48 0.22 1.44 07/01/04 06/30/05 0.00 0.00 0.50 0.25 1.53 07/01/05 06/30/06 0.00 0.00 0.52 0.25 1.59 07/01/06 06/30/07 0.01 0.00 0.54 0.25 1.63 Source: Access tariff filings. 4 Although the charges took effect on July 1, 2000,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-274610A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-274610A1.txt
  • lower L-band frequencies, to add AMSC-1 @101 W.L. as a point of communication, to add new antennas and related services. Comtech, also requests waiver of footnotes US308 and US315 to the U.S. Table of Frequency Allocations and Section 25.136(d) of the Commission's rules. SITE ID: 1 25,000 half-duplex data METs CONUS, ALASKA, HAWAII LOCATION: SCI SYSTEMS, INC. Quadrafilar helix A1/INTNAL 0.15 meters ANTENNA ID: MT-20101 Internal 9.00 dBW DIRECT SEQUENCE SPREAD SPECTRUM (DSSS), BPSK, 84.375 KHz CHIP RATE, DATA 1646.5000 - 1660.0000 MHz 168KG1D DSSS, BPSK, 84.375 KHz CHIP RATE, DATA 1545.0000 - 1558.5000 MHz 168KG1D SENSOR SYSTEMS quadrafilar helix A2/EXTNAL 0.15 meters ANTENNA ID: S65-8282-101 DSSS, BPSK, 84.375 KHz CHIP RATE, DATA 1545.0000 - 1558.5000 MHz 168KG1D 9.00 dBW DSSS,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-275833A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-275833A1.txt
  • to correct Schedule S information. SITE ID: 1 25,000 half-duplex data METs CONUS, ALASKA, HAWAII LOCATION: SCI SYSTEMS, INC. Conformal patch A4-INTNAL 0.01 meters ANTENNA ID: MT-2010 Internal 11.00 dBW DSSS, BPSK, 84.375 KHz CHIP RATE, DATA 1646.5000 - 1660.0000 MHz 168KG1D DSSS, BPSK, 84.375 KHz CHIP RATE, DATA 1545.0000 - 1558.5000 MHz 168KG1D SCI SYSTEMS, INC. Quadrafilar helix A1/INTNAL 0.15 meters ANTENNA ID: MT-20101 Internal 9.00 dBW DIRECT SEQUENCE SPREAD SPECTRUM (DSSS), BPSK, 84.375 KHz CHIP RATE, DATA 1646.5000 - 1660.0000 MHz 168KG1D DSSS, BPSK, 84.375 KHz CHIP RATE, DATA 1545.0000 - 1558.5000 MHz 168KG1D Page 1 of 15 SENSOR SYSTEMS quadrafilar helix A2/EXTNAL 0.15 meters ANTENNA ID: S65-8282-101 9.00 dBW DSSS, BPSK, 84.375 KHz CHIP RATE, DATA 1646.5000 -
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-276570A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-276570A1.txt
  • E990143 SES-AMD-20070907-01251 E Class of Station: Mobile Earth Station Amendment COMTECH MOBILE DATACOM CORP. Nature of Service: Mobile Satellite Service Amendment filed to modification application to merge site ID N/A with site ID 1. See full description in Exhibit A in this application. SITE ID: 1 25,000 half-duplex data METs CONUS, ALASKA, HAWAII LOCATION: SCI SYSTEMS, INC. Quadrafilar helix A1/INTNAL 0.15 meters ANTENNA ID: MT-20101 Internal 9.00 dBW DIRECT SEQUENCE SPREAD SPECTRUM (DSSS), BPSK, 84.375 KHz CHIP RATE, DATA 1646.5000 - 1660.0000 MHz 168KG1D DSSS, BPSK, 84.375 KHz CHIP RATE, DATA 1545.0000 - 1558.5000 MHz 168KG1D SENSOR SYSTEMS quadrafilar helix A2/EXTNAL 0.15 meters ANTENNA ID: S65-8282-101 9.00 dBW DSSS, BPSK, 84.375 KHz CHIP RATE, DATA 1646.5000 - 1660.0000 MHz 168KG1D DSSS,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A1.txt
  • 3.83 2,962 883 3,162 925 Puerto Rico 2,003 1.05 808 241 863 252 Rhode Island 654 0.34 264 79 282 82 South Carolina 2,593 1.35 1,046 312 1,117 327 South Dakota 435 0.23 176 52 187 55 Tennessee 3,791 1.98 1,530 456 1,633 477 Texas 14,403 7.52 5,812 1,732 6,204 1,814 Utah 1,416 0.74 571 170 610 178 Vermont 296 0.15 119 36 127 37 Virginia 4,900 2.56 1,977 589 2,111 617 Virgin Islands NA NA NA NA NA NA Washington 3,995 2.09 1,612 480 1,721 503 West Virginia 821 0.43 331 99 354 103 Wisconsin 3,191 1.67 1,288 384 1,375 402 Wyoming 331 0.17 133 40 142 42 Total 2/ 192,053 100.00% $77,573$23,152 $82,804 $24,252 NA - Not Applicable. *
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A13.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A13.txt
  • Washington, D.C. DC (34,122) (33,845) (276) 0.81 Verizon Florida, LLC FL (69,097) (68,850) (247) 0.36 AT&T - BellSouth - Florida FL (120,919) (120,745) (174) 0.14 Embarq - Florida FL (2,254) (1,791) (463) 20.54 Windstream Georgia Communications GA (332) (242) (91) 27.41 AT&T - BellSouth - Georgia GA (87,030) (87,145) 115 (0.13) Verizon - Northwest - Idaho ID (3,280) (3,274) (5) 0.15 Qwest - Idaho South ID (770) (696) (73) 9.48 Qwest - Idaho North ID (137) (135) (2) 1.46 Verizon North - Contel/Illinois IL 1,632 1,636 (3) (0.18) Verizon South - Illinois IL (153) (153) 0 0.00 Verizon North - Illinois IL 12,099 12,109 (11) (0.09) AT&T - Ameritech - Illinois Bell IL (160,144) (160,494) 350 (0.22) Verizon North - Contel/Indiana
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A3.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A3.txt
  • 3.83 2,962 883 3,162 925 Puerto Rico 2,003 1.05 808 241 863 252 Rhode Island 654 0.34 264 79 282 82 South Carolina 2,593 1.35 1,046 312 1,117 327 South Dakota 435 0.23 176 52 187 55 Tennessee 3,791 1.98 1,530 456 1,633 477 Texas 14,403 7.52 5,812 1,732 6,204 1,814 Utah 1,416 0.74 571 170 610 178 Vermont 296 0.15 119 36 127 37 Virginia 4,900 2.56 1,977 589 2,111 617 Virgin Islands NA NA NA NA NA NA Washington 3,995 2.09 1,612 480 1,721 503 West Virginia 821 0.43 331 99 354 103 Wisconsin 3,191 1.67 1,288 384 1,375 402 Wyoming 331 0.17 133 40 142 42 Total 2/ 192,053 100.00% $77,573$23,152 $82,804 $24,252 NA - Not Applicable. *
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A4.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A4.txt
  • Rico 8.25 8.25 8.25 3.36 3.50 3.37 1.68 1.75 1.68 9.93 10.00 9.93 13.29 13.50 13.30 Rhode Island 8.15 8.19 8.15 0.00 3.50 3.28 0.00 1.75 1.64 8.15 9.94 9.79 8.15 13.44 13.07 South Carolina 7.41 8.25 8.23 0.00 3.50 3.49 0.00 1.75 1.74 7.41 10.00 9.97 7.41 13.50 13.46 South Dakota 6.50 8.25 8.21 0.00 3.50 0.30 0.00 1.75 0.15 6.50 10.00 8.36 6.50 13.50 8.66 Tennessee 6.84 8.25 8.11 0.00 3.50 3.10 0.00 1.75 1.55 6.84 10.00 9.66 6.84 13.50 12.75 Texas 4.74 8.25 7.18 0.00 3.50 3.43 0.00 1.75 1.71 4.74 10.00 8.89 4.74 13.50 12.32 Utah 8.10 8.25 8.12 0.00 3.50 3.49 0.00 1.75 1.75 8.10 10.00 9.87 8.10 13.50 13.37 Vermont 8.15 8.25 8.17 0.00 3.50
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A5.txt
  • 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.38 0.25 0.07 0.73 Puerto Rico 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.12 3.05 0.00 0.00 3.17 Rhode Island 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.01 South Carolina 1.00 0.07 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.39 0.46 0.21 3.14 South Dakota 4.86 0.26 0.00 0.44 0.00 4.07 0.01 2.44 12.08 Tennessee 0.32 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.53 0.23 0.15 1.24 Texas 0.71 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.41 0.33 0.13 1.58 Utah 0.54 0.03 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.69 0.18 0.27 1.71 Vermont 1.18 0.07 0.00 1.64 0.00 1.05 0.40 0.68 5.03 Virgin Islands 12.90 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 17.41 0.00 0.00 30.31 Virginia 0.05 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.12 0.95 0.08 1.21 Washington 0.46 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.47 0.75
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A9.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A9.txt
  • and International International All Interstate Switched Services Switched ServicesSwitched ServicesSwitched Services 1984 $0.32 NA NA NA 1985 0.31 NA NA NA 1986 0.28 NA NA NA 1987 0.25 NA NA NA 1988 0.23 NA NA NA 1989 0.22 NA NA NA 1990 0.20 NA NA NA 1991 0.20 NA NA NA 1992 0.19 $0.19 $1.01 $0.15 1993 0.19 0.19 1.02 0.15 1994 0.18 0.18 0.93 0.14 1995 NA 0.17 0.91 0.12 1996 NA 0.16 0.76 0.12 1997 NA 0.15 0.69 0.11 1998 NA 0.14 0.58 0.11 1999 NA 0.14 0.54 0.11 2000 NA 0.12 0.52 0.09 2001 NA 0.10 0.35 0.08 2002 NA 0.09 0.28 0.07 2003 NA 0.08 0.20 0.07 2004 NA 0.08 0.14 0.06 2005 NA 0.07 0.13 0.06
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-283460A1.pdf
  • Commission's finding that Intelsat complies with the Orbit Act. See related File Nos. SAT-LOA-20050210-00029, SAT-AMD-20051118-00240, SAT-AMD-20080114-00012 and SAT-AMD-20080617-00125. S2661 SAT-AMD-20080701-00137 E Amendment 07/01/2008 11:46:38:34600 Date Filed: Intelsat North America LLC Intelsat North America LLC (Intelsat) requests authority to construct, launch, and operate a 17/24 GHz Broadcasting Satellite Service (BSS) space station at the 95.15° W.L. orbital location, which is offset 0.15° from the 95° W.L. orbital location specified in Appendix F to the 17/24 GHz Report and Order, FCC 07-76 (rel. May 4, 2007), at a reduced power and without full interference protection. (See FCC 07-76 and 07-174 for a complete explanation of the rules and policies regarding the spacing framework and interference protections adopted by the Commission). Intelsat seeks to
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-284932A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-284932A1.txt
  • 0.21 6.16 07/01/96 06/30/97 0.72 0.89 1.95 0.17 6.04 07/01/97 12/31/97 0.64 0.84 1.63 0.14 5.18 01/01/98 06/30/98 0.68 0.23 1.29 0.21 4.04 07/01/98 12/31/98 0.91 0.20 0.99 0.30 3.82 01/01/99 06/30/99 0.82 0.16 0.98 0.32 3.71 07/01/99 12/31/99 0.37 0.10 0.86 0.28 2.82 01/01/00 06/30/00 0.32 0.10 0.86 0.31 2.85 08/11/00 06/31/004 0.23 0.07 0.52 0.26 1.91 07/01/01 12/31/01 0.15 0.07 0.48 0.24 1.71 01/01/02 06/30/02 0.15 0.07 0.47 0.24 1.69 07/01/02 06/30/03 0.02 0.01 0.48 0.22 1.46 07/01/03 06/30/04 0.00 0.00 0.48 0.22 1.44 07/01/04 06/30/05 0.00 0.00 0.50 0.25 1.53 07/01/05 06/30/06 0.00 0.00 0.52 0.25 1.59 07/01/06 06/30/07 0.01 0.00 0.54 0.25 1.63 07/01/07 06/30/08 0.01 0.00 0.56 0.26 1.71 Source: Access tariff filings. Rates in Effect
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-284934A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-284934A1.txt
  • 14.30 0.10 46.58 3.99 Table 1.3 Residential Telephone Rates in the Sample Cities 1 (As of October 15, 2007) Daytime Call Plan State City Monthly Telephone Rate Including Touch-Tone, Cost of a Connection Charges Least-Cost Telephone Surcharges, and Taxes Five-Minute Including Touch-Tone, Inside Wiring Company Flat-Rate Measured/Message Same-Zone Surcharges, and Taxes Maintenance Service Service New Mexico Alamogordo Qwest 24.46 15.49 0.15 33.49 4.75 New York Binghamton Verizon 34.84 22.17 0.09 63.18 3.99 New York Buffalo Verizon 35.78 22.68 0.09 64.63 3.99 New York Massena Verizon 32.99 22.05 0.09 62.83 3.99 New York New York City Verizon 36.37 23.42 0.09 64.58 3.99 New York Ogdensburg Verizon 33.86 22.63 0.09 64.48 3.99 New York Rochester Citizen 26.37 16.46 0.15 38.01 3.95 North Carolina
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287688A1.pdf
  • 3.85 3,215 1,006 3,369 1,052 Puerto Rico 2,171 1.00 836 262 876 273 Rhode Island 765 0.35 295 92 309 96 South Carolina 3,001 1.38 1,156 362 1,211 378 South Dakota 514 0.24 198 62 207 65 Tennessee 4,731 2.18 1,822 570 1,909 596 Texas 16,928 7.81 6,520 2,041 6,830 2,133 Utah 1,649 0.76 635 199 665 208 Vermont 334 0.15 128 40 135 42 Virginia 5,325 2.46 2,051 642 2,149 671 Virgin Islands NA NA NA NA NA NA Washington 4,495 2.07 1,731 542 1,814 566 West Virginia 965 0.44 372 116 389 122 Wisconsin 3,517 1.62 1,355 424 1,419 443 Wyoming 359 0.17 138 43 145 45 Total 2/ 217,418 100.00% $83,810$26,278 $87,807 $27,465 NA - Not Applicable. *
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287688A11.pdf
  • 112.2 421.2 14.4 561.1 For Unscheduled Events Over 2 Minutes 0.5 1.9 0.6 9.0 NA 105.9 421.2 14.4 561.1 For Unscheduled Downtime More Than 2 Minutes Number of Occurrences or Events 4 3 2 11 0 36 6 5 62 Events per Hundred Switches 0.3 0.2 0.3 0.7 0.0 2.8 0.5 0.4 2.6 Events per Million Access Lines 0.31 0.17 0.15 0.99 0.00 3.20 0.51 0.31 5.08 Average Outage Duration in Minutes 3.3 17.5 4.0 22.1 NA 64.2 1518.7 67.3 363.2 Average Lines Affected per Event in Thousands 16.1 19.6 57.8 11.6 NA 1.9 14.0 6.7 2.3 Outage Line-Minutes per Event in Thousands 53.1 447.5 196.5 93.7 NA 144.0 8,786.1 181.7 859.1 Outage Line-Minutes per 1,000 Access Lines 16.2 77.6 29.0
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287688A13.pdf
  • Inc. HI 6,753 7,015 (261) (3.86) Verizon - Northwest - Idaho ID (5,017) (5,015) (1) 0.02 Qwest - Idaho South ID (132) (87) (45) 34.09 Qwest - Idaho North ID (7) (5) (3) 42.86 Verizon North - Contel/Illinois IL (113) (110) (3) 2.65 Verizon South - Illinois IL (144) (143) (1) 0.69 Verizon North - Illinois IL (3,316) (3,311) (5) 0.15 AT&T - Ameritech - Illinois Bell IL (173,690) (173,407) (283) 0.16 Verizon North - Contel/Indiana IN (3,526) (3,503) (24) 0.68 Verizon North - Indiana IN (10,791) (10,762) (29) 0.27 AT&T - Ameritech - Indiana Bell IN (2,223) (2,030) (193) 8.68 Embarq - United Telephone Company of Indiana IN (54) (37) (17) 31.48 Iowa Telecommunications Services - Iowa IA 67 53
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287688A3.pdf
  • 3.85 3,215 1,006 3,369 1,052 Puerto Rico 2,171 1.00 836 262 876 273 Rhode Island 765 0.35 295 92 309 96 South Carolina 3,001 1.38 1,156 362 1,211 378 South Dakota 514 0.24 198 62 207 65 Tennessee 4,731 2.18 1,822 570 1,909 596 Texas 16,928 7.81 6,520 2,041 6,830 2,133 Utah 1,649 0.76 635 199 665 208 Vermont 334 0.15 128 40 135 42 Virginia 5,325 2.46 2,051 642 2,149 671 Virgin Islands NA NA NA NA NA NA Washington 4,495 2.07 1,731 542 1,814 566 West Virginia 965 0.44 372 116 389 122 Wisconsin 3,517 1.62 1,355 424 1,419 443 Wyoming 359 0.17 138 43 145 45 Total 2/ 217,418 100.00% $83,810$26,278 $87,807 $27,465 NA - Not Applicable. *
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287688A5.pdf
  • Delaware 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.04 0.00 0.04 Dist. of Columbia 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Florida 0.07 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.05 0.39 0.02 0.53 Georgia 0.52 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.59 0.34 0.17 1.64 Guam 0.94 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 6.08 0.00 0.00 7.01 Hawaii 3.37 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.98 0.29 0.15 5.79 Idaho 2.51 0.08 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.28 1.83 0.70 6.41 Illinois 0.18 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.35 0.13 0.13 0.80 Indiana 0.38 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.42 0.48 0.21 1.50 Iowa 1.27 0.14 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.64 0.28 1.08 4.42 Kansas 5.33 0.14 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.82 0.26 0.82 9.37 Kentucky 1.06 0.02 0.00 0.60 0.00 0.89 0.62 0.25
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287688A7.pdf
  • Areas Funding Year 2005: July 1, 2005 through June 30, 2006 5 - 12 USAC Disbursements Disbursements State or on Behalf of Rural Population in Per Person in Jurisdiction Health Care Providers Rural Areas1 Rural Areas Alabama $41 1,407 $0.03 Alaska 23,590 367 64.34 American Samoa 0 57 0.00 Arizona 1,040 954 1.09 Arkansas 42 1,435 0.03 California 384 2,521 0.15 Colorado 87 777 0.11 Connecticut 0 334 0.00 Delaware 0 157 0.00 District of Columbia 0 0 NA Florida 195 1,427 0.14 Georgia 817 2,520 0.32 Guam 0 155 0.00 Hawaii 178 335 0.53 Idaho 124 862 0.14 Illinois 425 1,878 0.23 Indiana 308 1,691 0.18 Iowa 345 1,600 0.22 Kansas 550 1,193 0.46 Kentucky 141 2,069 0.07 Louisiana 58
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287688A9.pdf
  • International All Interstate Switched Services Switched Services Switched Services Switched Services 1984 $0.32 NA NA NA 1985 0.31 NA NA NA 1986 0.28 NA NA NA 1987 0.25 NA NA NA 1988 0.23 NA NA NA 1989 0.22 NA NA NA 1990 0.20 NA NA NA 1991 0.20 NA NA NA 1992 0.19 $0.19 $1.01 $0.15 1993 0.19 0.19 1.02 0.15 1994 0.18 0.18 0.93 0.14 1995 NA 0.17 0.91 0.12 1996 NA 0.16 0.76 0.12 1997 NA 0.15 0.69 0.11 1998 NA 0.14 0.58 0.11 1999 NA 0.14 0.54 0.11 2000 NA 0.12 0.52 0.09 2001 NA 0.10 0.35 0.08 2002 NA 0.09 0.28 0.07 2003 NA 0.08 0.20 0.07 2004 NA 0.08 0.14 0.06 2005 NA 0.07 0.13 0.06
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287855A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287855A1.txt
  • Voice and data services 1525.0000 - 1559.0000 MHz 50K0G7W Voice and data services 1525.0000 - 1559.0000 MHz 200KG7W Voice and data services 1525.0000 - 1559.0000 MHz 12K5G7W NERA 3 0.125 meters ANTENNA ID: NERA PUT 11.00 dBW Voice and data services 1626.5000 - 1660.5000 MHz 25K0G7W 11.00 dBW Voice and data services 1626.5000 - 1660.5000 MHz 200KG7W Add Value 4 0.15 meters ANTENNA ID: Add Value PUT Voice and data services 1525.0000 - 1559.0000 MHz 50K0G7W Voice and data services 1525.0000 - 1559.0000 MHz 200KG7W Voice and data services 1525.0000 - 1559.0000 MHz 12K5G7W Add Value 4 0.15 meters ANTENNA ID: Add Value PUT 11.00 dBW Voice and data services 1626.5000 - 1660.5000 MHz 25K0G7W 11.00 dBW Voice and data services
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-289354A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-289354A1.txt
  • of Station: Mobile Earth Station Application for Authority COMTECH MOBILE DATACOM CORP. Nature of Service: Mobile Satellite Service Comtech Mobile Datacom Corporation (CMDC) requests a waiver of footnotes US308 and US315 to the U.S. Table of Frequency Allocations and Section 25.136(d) of the Commission's rules. SITE ID: ISAT -- ROUS 20430 Century Boulevard, Montgomery, Germantown, MD LOCATION: SCI Systems 1-2020/INT 0.15 meters ANTENNA ID: MT-2010 internal 0.00 dBW DSSS, BPSK, 21,094 to 84,375 CPS, Data, Marine & Land Mobile 1530.0000 - 1544.0000 MHz 200KG7W 0.00 dBW DSSS, BPSK, 21,094 to 84,375 CPS, Data, Marine & Land Mobile 1545.0000 - 1559.0000 MHz 200KG7W 10.20 dBW DSSS, BPSK, 21,094 to 84,375 CPS, Data, Marine & Land Mobile 1631.5000 - 1645.5000 MHz 200KG7W 10.20
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-289874A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-289874A1.txt
  • action. E900081 SES-AFS-20090323-00359 E Class of Station: Mobile Earth Station Amendment GeoLogic Solutions, Inc. Nature of Service: Mobile Satellite Service Amendment filed to provide additional technical information to its pending modification application, see SES-MFS-20090313-00302. SITE ID: 1 50,100 half-duplex METs in CONUS, AK, HI PR, USVI & coastal areas up to 200 miles, offshore LOCATION: Rockwell Collins, Trimble Navigation 1 0.15 meters ANTENNA ID: Pro-2000, Galaxy7003 17.00 dBW Mobile messaging service and multi-mod mobile messaging service 1626.5000 - 1645.5000 MHz 2K40G1D 23.00 dBW Mobile messaging service and multi-mod mobile messaging service 1626.5000 - 1645.5000 MHz 9K60G1D Mobile messaging service and multi-mod mobile messaging service 1530.0000 - 1544.0000 MHz 1K20G1D Mobile messaging service and multi-mod mobile messaging service 1530.0000 - 1544.0000 MHz
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-291841A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-291841A1.txt
  • to 151,000 CPS, Data, Land Mobile 1545.0000 - 1559.0000 MHz 168KG1D 8.50 dBW DSSS, BPSK, 21,094 to 151,000 CPS, Data, Land Mobile 1631.5000 - 1645.5000 MHz 168KG1D Page 2 of 18 8.50 dBW DSSS, BPSK, 21,094 to 151,000 CPS, Data, Land Mobile 1646.5000 - 1660.5000 MHz 168KG1D SITE ID: ISAT/CONUS 20430 Century Boulevard, Montgomery, Germantown, MD LOCATION: SCI Systems 1-2010/INT 0.15 meters ANTENNA ID: MT-2010 internal 0.00 dBW DSSS,BPSK, 21, 094 to 84,375 CPS, Data, Marine & Land Mobile 1530.0000 - 1544.0000 MHz 200KG7W 0.00 dBW DSSS,BPSK, 21, 094 to 84,375 CPS, Data, Marine & Land Mobile 1545.0000 - 1559.0000 MHz 200KG7W 10.20 dBW DSSS,BPSK, 21, 094 to 84,375 CPS, Data, Marine & Land Mobile 1631.5000 - 1645.5000 MHz 200KG7W 10.20
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-292556A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-292556A1.txt
  • dBW DSSS, BPSK, 21,094 to 151,000 CPS, Data, Land Mobile 1631.5000 - 1645.5000 MHz 168KG1D 0.00 dBW DSSS, BPSK, 21,094 to 151,000 CPS, Data, Land Mobile 1545.0000 - 1559.0000 MHz 168KG1D 0.00 dBW DSSS, BPSK, 21,094 to 151,000 CPS, Data, Land Mobile 1530.0000 - 1544.0000 MHz 168KG1D SITE ID: ISAT/ASDR 20430 Century Boulevard, Montgomery, Germantown, MD LOCATION: SCI Systems 1-2010/INT 0.15 meters ANTENNA ID: MT-2010 internal 10.20 dBW DSSS,BPSK, 21, 094 to 84,375 CPS, Data, Marine & Land Mobile 1646.5000 - 1660.5000 MHz 200KG7W 10.20 dBW DSSS,BPSK, 21, 094 to 84,375 CPS, Data, Marine & Land Mobile 1631.5000 - 1645.5000 MHz 200KG7W 0.00 dBW DSSS,BPSK, 21, 094 to 84,375 CPS, Data, Marine & Land Mobile 1545.0000 - 1559.0000 MHz 200KG7W 0.00
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-293232A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-293232A1.txt
  • effective dates of the actions are the dates specified. E900081 SES-AFS-20090323-00359 E Date Effective: 08/27/2009 Class of Station: Mobile Earth Station Grant of Authority Amendment GeoLogic Solutions, Inc. Nature of Service: Mobile Satellite Service SITE ID: 1 50,100 half-duplex METs in CONUS, AK, HI PR, USVI & coastal areas up to 200 miles, offshore LOCATION: Rockwell Collins, Trimble Navigation 1 0.15 meters ANTENNA ID: Pro-2000, Galaxy7003 17.00 dBW Mobile messaging service and multi-mod mobile messaging service 1626.5000 - 1645.5000 MHz 2K40G1D 23.00 dBW Mobile messaging service and multi-mod mobile messaging service 1626.5000 - 1645.5000 MHz 9K60G1D Mobile messaging service and multi-mod mobile messaging service 1530.0000 - 1544.0000 MHz 1K20G1D Mobile messaging service and multi-mod mobile messaging service 1530.0000 - 1544.0000 MHz
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-293350A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-293350A1.txt
  • TULSA I LICENSING, L.L.C. Application for Consent to Assignment GRIFFIN TULSA I LICENSING, L.L.C. E090027 SES-LIC-20090211-00164 E Date Effective: 09/04/2009 Class of Station: Mobile Earth Station Grant of Authority 09/04/2009 - 09/04/2011 Application for Authority COMTECH MOBILE DATACOM CORP. Nature of Service: Mobile Satellite Service SITE ID: ISAT -- ROUS 20430 Century Boulevard, Montgomery, Germantown, MD LOCATION: SCI Systems 1-2020/INT 0.15 meters ANTENNA ID: MT-2010 internal 0.00 dBW DSSS, BPSK, 21,094 to 84,375 CPS, Data, Marine & Land Mobile 1530.0000 - 1544.0000 MHz 200KG7W 0.00 dBW DSSS, BPSK, 21,094 to 84,375 CPS, Data, Marine & Land Mobile 1545.0000 - 1559.0000 MHz 200KG7W Page 1 of 10 10.20 dBW DSSS, BPSK, 21,094 to 84,375 CPS, Data, Marine & Land Mobile 1631.5000 -
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-294699A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-294699A1.txt
  • additional antenna model (made by TECOM) to existing AMSS network, without increasing authorized number of units. SITE ID: Remotes Operate up to 1000 (.6 m terminals), CONUS LOCATION: AeroSat Avionics A 0.6 meters ANTENNA ID: 70-100-0000-01 38.60 dBW QPSK or octal PSK 14050.0000 - 14470.0000 MHz 1M60G7D 0.00 dBW QPSK or octal PSK 11700.0000 - 12200.0000 MHz 36M0G7D Telcom B 0.15 meters ANTENNA ID: Ku-Stream QPSK or octal PSK 11700.0000 - 12200.0000 MHz 36M0G7D 38.80 dBW QPSK or octal PSK 14050.0000 - 14470.0000 MHz 1M60G7D Points of Communication: Remotes - AMC 2 - (100.95 W.L) Page 1 of 3 Remotes - AMC 9 - (83 W.L.) Remotes - AMC-1 - (101.0 W.L.) Remotes - HORIZONS 1 - (127 DEG WL) E090199
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295352A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295352A1.txt
  • of CMDC's other blanket MET licenses. To this end, CMDC proposes in this Application to operate the following additional MESs in portions of the L-band (1525-1544/1545-1559 MHz and 1626.5-1645.5/1646.5-1660.5 MHz). CMDC request waiver of footnotes US308 and US315 and Section 25.136(d) of the Commission's rules. SITE ID: ISAT -- ROUS 20430 Century Boulevard, Montgomery, Germantown, MD LOCATION: SCI Systems 1-2020/INT 0.15 meters ANTENNA ID: MT-2010 internal 10.20 dBW DSSS, BPSK, 21,094 to 84,375 CPS, Data, Marine & Land Mobile 1646.5000 - 1660.5000 MHz 200KG7W 10.20 dBW DSSS, BPSK, 21,094 to 84,375 CPS, Data, Marine & Land Mobile 1631.5000 - 1645.5000 MHz 200KG7W 0.00 dBW DSSS, BPSK, 21,094 to 84,375 CPS, Data, Marine & Land Mobile 1545.0000 - 1559.0000 MHz 200KG7W 0.00
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A1.txt
  • NA NA NA NA NA Ohio 5,811,185 3.48 4.88 3.83 349 459 Oklahoma 1,181,452 0.71 0.70 0.70 64 85 Oregon 1,317,944 0.79 1.27 0.91 83 109 Pennsylvania 6,604,937 3.95 5.18 4.26 388 511 Puerto Rico 0 0.00 0.24 0.06 5 7 Rhode Island 855,074 0.51 0.06 0.40 36 48 South Carolina 2,096,742 1.25 1.55 1.33 121 159 South Dakota 245,752 0.15 0.49 0.23 21 28 Tennessee 2,668,101 1.60 0.75 1.38 126 166 Texas 12,667,912 7.58 8.81 7.89 718 946 Utah 944,664 0.57 0.74 0.61 56 73 Vermont 632,509 0.38 0.10 0.31 28 37 Virginia 4,531,805 2.71 2.31 2.61 238 313 Virgin Islands NA NA NA NA NA NA Washington 2,970,163 1.78 2.16 1.87 171 225 West Virginia 1,067,865 0.64 0.59 0.63
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A3.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A3.txt
  • NA NA NA NA NA Ohio 5,811,185 3.48 4.88 3.83 349 459 Oklahoma 1,181,452 0.71 0.70 0.70 64 85 Oregon 1,317,944 0.79 1.27 0.91 83 109 Pennsylvania 6,604,937 3.95 5.18 4.26 388 511 Puerto Rico 0 0.00 0.24 0.06 5 7 Rhode Island 855,074 0.51 0.06 0.40 36 48 South Carolina 2,096,742 1.25 1.55 1.33 121 159 South Dakota 245,752 0.15 0.49 0.23 21 28 Tennessee 2,668,101 1.60 0.75 1.38 126 166 Texas 12,667,912 7.58 8.81 7.89 718 946 Utah 944,664 0.57 0.74 0.61 56 73 Vermont 632,509 0.38 0.10 0.31 28 37 Virginia 4,531,805 2.71 2.31 2.61 238 313 Virgin Islands NA NA NA NA NA NA Washington 2,970,163 1.78 2.16 1.87 171 225 West Virginia 1,067,865 0.64 0.59 0.63
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A4.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A4.txt
  • Rico 8.25 8.25 8.25 3.50 3.50 3.50 1.75 1.75 1.75 10.00 10.00 10.00 13.50 13.50 13.50 Rhode Island 8.15 8.15 8.15 3.50 3.50 3.50 1.75 1.75 1.75 9.90 9.90 9.90 13.40 13.40 13.40 South Carolina 7.38 8.25 8.24 3.50 3.50 3.50 1.75 1.75 1.75 9.13 10.00 9.99 12.63 13.50 13.49 South Dakota 7.89 8.25 8.19 0.00 3.50 0.31 0.00 1.75 0.15 7.89 10.00 8.34 7.89 13.50 8.65 Tennessee 6.85 8.25 8.15 0.00 3.50 3.19 0.00 1.75 1.59 6.85 10.00 9.75 6.85 13.50 12.94 Texas 5.36 8.25 7.28 0.00 3.50 3.35 0.00 1.75 1.67 5.36 10.00 8.95 5.36 13.50 12.30 Utah 8.09 8.25 8.15 3.50 3.50 3.50 1.75 1.75 1.75 9.84 10.00 9.90 13.34 13.50 13.40 Vermont 8.15 8.25 8.17 3.50 3.50
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A5.txt
  • 2000 2001 2002 2003 2008 3 - 28 Alabama $0.60 $0.01 $0.00 $1.31 $0.00 $0.59 $0.58 $0.17 $3.25 Alaska 6.93 0.06 0.00 0.00 0.00 7.37 0.00 1.52 15.88 American Samoa 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4.74 0.00 2.97 7.71 Arizona 0.87 0.02 (0.00) 0.00 0.00 0.39 0.54 0.28 2.10 Arkansas 3.89 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.93 0.01 0.53 7.37 California 0.15 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.10 0.17 0.02 0.44 Colorado 1.24 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.81 0.63 0.17 2.86 Connecticut 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 (0.01) 0.02 (0.01) 0.01 Delaware 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.04 0.00 0.04 Dist. of Columbia 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Florida 0.07 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.07 0.37 0.03 0.54
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A7.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A7.txt
  • 1,407 $0.03 Alaska 25,251 367 68.87 American Samoa 0 57 0.00 Arizona 1,323 954 1.39 Arkansas 143 1,435 0.10 California 527 2,521 0.21 Colorado 92 777 0.12 Connecticut 0 334 0.00 Delaware 0 157 0.00 District of Columbia 0 0 NA Florida 311 1,427 0.22 Georgia 925 2,520 0.37 Guam 78 155 0.50 Hawaii 198 335 0.59 Idaho 131 862 0.15 Illinois 585 1,878 0.31 Indiana 361 1,691 0.21 Iowa 365 1,600 0.23 Kansas 551 1,193 0.46 Kentucky 175 2,069 0.08 Louisiana 58 1,111 0.05 Maine 51 854 0.06 Maryland 0 385 0.00 Massachusetts 57 335 0.17 Michigan 579 1,769 0.33 Minnesota 1,622 1,594 1.02 Mississippi 86 1,821 0.05 Missouri 136 1,799 0.08 Montana 516 705 0.73 Nebraska 1,655 811 2.04
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A9.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A9.txt
  • International All Interstate Switched Services Switched Services Switched Services Switched Services 1984 $0.32 NA NA NA 1985 0.31 NA NA NA 1986 0.28 NA NA NA 1987 0.25 NA NA NA 1988 0.23 NA NA NA 1989 0.22 NA NA NA 1990 0.20 NA NA NA 1991 0.20 NA NA NA 1992 0.19 $0.19 $1.01 $0.15 1993 0.19 0.19 1.02 0.15 1994 0.18 0.18 0.93 0.14 1995 NA 0.17 0.91 0.12 1996 NA 0.16 0.76 0.12 1997 NA 0.15 0.69 0.11 1998 NA 0.14 0.58 0.11 1999 NA 0.14 0.54 0.11 2000 NA 0.12 0.52 0.09 2001 NA 0.10 0.35 0.08 2002 NA 0.09 0.28 0.07 2003 NA 0.08 0.21 0.06 2004 NA 0.08 0.14 0.06 2005 NA 0.07 0.10 0.07
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-298062A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-298062A1.txt
  • (15.5 W.L.) 1 - INMARSAT Ltd-3 - (178 E.L.) 1 - ISAT List - E090027 SES-MOD-20090923-01223 E Date Effective: 05/10/2010 Class of Station: Mobile Earth Station Grant of Authority 09/04/2009 - 09/04/2011 Application for Modification COMTECH MOBILE DATACOM CORP. Nature of Service: Mobile Satellite Service SITE ID: ISAT -- ROUS 20430 Century Boulevard, Montgomery, Germantown, MD LOCATION: SCI Systems 1-2020/INT 0.15 meters ANTENNA ID: MT-2010 internal 10.20 dBW DSSS, BPSK, 21,094 to 84,375 CPS, Data, Marine & Land Mobile 1646.5000 - 1660.5000 MHz 200KG7W 10.20 dBW DSSS, BPSK, 21,094 to 84,375 CPS, Data, Marine & Land Mobile 1631.5000 - 1645.5000 MHz 200KG7W Page 5 of 20 DSSS, BPSK, 21,094 to 84,375 CPS, Data, Marine & Land Mobile 1545.0000 - 1559.0000 MHz
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-298699A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-298699A1.txt
  • - PERMITTED LIST - () E900081 SES-MOD-20100226-00265 E Date Effective: 06/04/2010 Class of Station: Mobile Earth Station Grant of Authority 06/01/2006 - 09/30/2011 Application for Modification GeoLogic Solutions, Inc. Nature of Service: Mobile Satellite Service SITE ID: 2 30,000 half-duplex METs in CONUS, AK, HI PR, USVI & coastal areas up to 200 miles, offshore LOCATION: VISTAR Telecommunications, Inc. 3(Upper-L) 0.15 meters ANTENNA ID: 1000000 6.00 dBW Multimode Mobile Messaging Service 1646.5000 - 1660.5000 MHz 2K40G1D Multimode Mobile Messaging Service 1545.0000 - 1559.0000 MHz 2K40G1D SITE ID: 1 50,100 half duplex METs in CONUS, AK, HI PR, USVI & coastal areas up to 200 miles, offshores LOCATION: VISTAR TELECOMMUNICATIONS, INC. 3(lower-L) 0.15 meters ANTENNA ID: 1000000 standard C 6.00 dBW OQPSK/packet
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-299338A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-299338A1.txt
  • also requested a change in the regulatory status of the earth station licenses from common carrier to non-common carrier to comport with the previously approved change in the regulatory status of the MSAT-2 space segment from common carrier to non-common carrier. SITE ID: 1 Up to 100,000 full duplex TAMS METs, VARIOUS LOCATION: Mobilacomm Dual-Band Patch / 15x15x2 cm TAM1 0.15 meters ANTENNA ID: SSMSRP1 11.00 dBW BPSK channel using TDMA slots/ tracking & asset management (TAMS) data services / land & maritime satellite services 1626.5000 - 1660.5000 MHz 5K00G7D TDM signaling channel using BPSK/ tracking & asset management (TAMS) data services / land & maritime satellite services 1525.0000 - 1559.0000 MHz 5K00G7D Mobilacomm Helical Whip / 1.5x1.5x25 cm TAM2 0.15
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-301799A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-301799A1.txt
  • 1 - PAS-3R - (43.0 W.L.) 1 - TELSTAR 11N - (37.55 W.L.) E990133 SES-MOD-20100510-00584 E Date Effective: 09/24/2010 Class of Station: Mobile Earth Station Withdrawn 09/25/2000 - 09/25/2010 Application for Modification LightSquared Subsidiary LLC Nature of Service: Mobile Satellite Service SITE ID: 1 Up to 100,000 full duplex TAMS METs, VARIOUS LOCATION: Mobilacomm Dual-Band Patch / 15x15x2 cm TAM1 0.15 meters ANTENNA ID: SSMSRP1 11.00 dBW BPSK channel using TDMA slots/ tracking & asset management (TAMS) data services / land & maritime satellite services 1626.5000 - 1660.5000 MHz 5K00G7D TDM signaling channel using BPSK/ tracking & asset management (TAMS) data services / land & maritime satellite services 1525.0000 - 1559.0000 MHz 5K00G7D Mobilacomm Helical Whip / 1.5x1.5x25 cm TAM2 0.15
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-301823A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-301823A1.txt
  • 0.21 6.16 07/01/96 06/30/97 0.72 0.89 1.95 0.17 6.04 07/01/97 12/31/97 0.64 0.84 1.63 0.14 5.18 01/01/98 06/30/98 0.68 0.23 1.29 0.21 4.04 07/01/98 12/31/98 0.91 0.20 0.99 0.30 3.82 01/01/99 06/30/99 0.82 0.16 0.98 0.32 3.71 07/01/99 12/31/99 0.37 0.10 0.86 0.28 2.82 01/01/00 06/30/00 0.32 0.10 0.86 0.31 2.85 08/11/00 06/31/004 0.23 0.07 0.52 0.26 1.91 07/01/01 12/31/01 0.15 0.07 0.48 0.24 1.71 01/01/02 06/30/02 0.15 0.07 0.47 0.24 1.69 07/01/02 06/30/03 0.02 0.01 0.48 0.22 1.46 07/01/03 06/30/04 0.00 0.00 0.48 0.22 1.44 07/01/04 06/30/05 0.00 0.00 0.50 0.25 1.53 07/01/05 06/30/06 0.00 0.00 0.52 0.25 1.59 07/01/06 06/30/07 0.01 0.00 0.54 0.25 1.63 07/01/07 06/30/08 0.01 0.00 0.56 0.26 1.71 07/01/08 06/30/09 0.01 0.00 0.63 0.24 1.80
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-302727A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-302727A1.txt
  • NWUF - SPACEWAY 2 - (99 W.L.) E900081 SES-MFS-20100916-01164 E Class of Station: Mobile Earth Station Modification GeoLogic Solutions, Inc. Nature of Service: Mobile Satellite Service "MOD" to reflect change in orbital location of MSAT-2. SITE ID: 2 30,000 half-duplex METs in CONUS, AK, HI PR, USVI & coastal areas up to 200 miles, offshore LOCATION: VISTAR Telecommunications, Inc. 3(Upper-L) 0.15 meters ANTENNA ID: 1000000 6.00 dBW Multimode Mobile Messaging Service 1646.5000 - 1660.5000 MHz 2K40G1D Multimode Mobile Messaging Service 1545.0000 - 1559.0000 MHz 2K40G1D SITE ID: 1 50,100 half duplex METs in CONUS, AK, HI PR, USVI & coastal areas up to 200 miles, offshores LOCATION: VISTAR TELECOMMUNICATIONS, INC. 3(lower-L) 0.15 meters ANTENNA ID: 1000000 standard C 6.00 dBW OQPSK/packet
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303758A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303758A1.txt
  • of Station: Mobile Earth Station Grant of Authority 06/01/2006 - 09/30/2011 Modification GeoLogic Solutions, Inc. Nature of Service: Mobile Satellite Service Changes PntComm to reflect MSAT-2 satellite at its new orbital location at 103.3º WL SITE ID: 2 30,000 half-duplex METs in CONUS, AK, HI PR, USVI & coastal areas up to 200 miles, offshore LOCATION: VISTAR Telecommunications, Inc. 3(Upper-L) 0.15 meters ANTENNA ID: 1000000 6.00 dBW Multimode Mobile Messaging Service 1646.5000 - 1660.5000 MHz 2K40G1D Multimode Mobile Messaging Service 1545.0000 - 1559.0000 MHz 2K40G1D SITE ID: 1 50,100 half duplex METs in CONUS, AK, HI PR, USVI & coastal areas up to 200 miles, offshores LOCATION: VISTAR TELECOMMUNICATIONS, INC. 3(lower-L) 0.15 meters ANTENNA ID: 1000000 standard C 6.00 dBW OQPSK/packet
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303851A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303851A1.txt
  • seeks authority to extend the term for two (2) years or until both MSAT-1 AND MSAT-2 cease operation of its blanket mobile earth terminal license, E990143, per the terms of the Commission's Order and Authorization in SES-AMD-20070907-01251, DA 09-906, rel. 5/15/09. SITE ID: 1 25,000 half-duplex data METs, CONUS, ALASKA, HAWAI LOCATION: Page 2 of 7 SCI SYSTEMS, INC. A1/INT 0.15 meters ANTENNA ID: MT-2010 Internal 10.20 dBW DSSS, BPSK, 84, 375 CPS, DATA, MARINE & LAND MOBILE 1646.5000 - 1660.5000 MHz 168KG1D 10.20 dBW DSSS, BPSK, 84, 375 CPS, DATA, MARINE & LAND MOBILE 1631.5000 - 1645.5000 MHz 168KG1D DSSS, BPSK, 84, 375 CPS, DATA, MARINE & LAND MOBILE 1545.0000 - 1559.0000 MHz 168KG1D DSSS, BPSK, 84, 375 CPS, DATA,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303886A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303886A1.txt
  • 0.17 4.34 MAINE 0.42 0.03 0.00 0.18 0.00 1.22 0.00 0.60 2.46 MARYLAND 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.03 0.06 0.01 0.11 MASSACHUSETTS 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.04 0.02 0.07 MICHIGAN 0.45 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.44 0.01 0.18 1.09 MINNESOTA 1.26 0.09 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.84 0.13 0.55 3.88 MISSISSIPPI 1.04 0.04 0.00 5.71 0.00 0.62 0.62 0.15 8.17 MISSOURI 1.49 0.04 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.04 0.29 0.16 3.03 MONTANA 3.99 0.04 0.00 2.38 0.00 3.53 0.11 0.66 10.70 NEBRASKA 2.30 0.04 0.00 0.61 0.00 2.46 0.72 1.27 7.41 NEVADA 0.33 (0.00) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.34 0.67 0.32 1.66 NEW HAMPSHIRE 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.44 0.18 0.36 1.01 NEW JERSEY 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.01
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303886A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303886A5.txt
  • 0.17 4.34 MAINE 0.42 0.03 0.00 0.18 0.00 1.22 0.00 0.60 2.46 MARYLAND 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.03 0.06 0.01 0.11 MASSACHUSETTS 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.04 0.02 0.07 MICHIGAN 0.45 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.44 0.01 0.18 1.09 MINNESOTA 1.26 0.09 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.84 0.13 0.55 3.88 MISSISSIPPI 1.04 0.04 0.00 5.71 0.00 0.62 0.62 0.15 8.17 MISSOURI 1.49 0.04 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.04 0.29 0.16 3.03 MONTANA 3.99 0.04 0.00 2.38 0.00 3.53 0.11 0.66 10.70 NEBRASKA 2.30 0.04 0.00 0.61 0.00 2.46 0.72 1.27 7.41 NEVADA 0.33 (0.00) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.34 0.67 0.32 1.66 NEW HAMPSHIRE 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.44 0.18 0.36 1.01 NEW JERSEY 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.01
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303886A7.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303886A7.txt
  • Rural Population in Per Person in Jurisdiction Health Care Providers Rural Areas1 Rural Areas Alabama $265 1,407 $0.19 Alaska 24,263 367 66.17 American Samoa 141 57 2.48 Arizona 712 954 0.75 Arkansas 418 1,435 0.29 California 769 2,521 0.31 Colorado 164 777 0.21 Connecticut 0 334 0.00 Delaware 0 157 0.00 District of Columbia 0 0 NA Florida 208 1,427 0.15 Georgia 1,226 2,520 0.49 Guam 72 155 0.46 Hawaii 134 335 0.40 Idaho 172 862 0.20 Illinois 969 1,878 0.52 Indiana 589 1,691 0.35 Iowa 474 1,600 0.30 Kansas 235 1,193 0.20 Kentucky 475 2,069 0.23 Louisiana 15 1,111 0.01 Maine 1 854 0.00 Maryland 0 385 0.00 Massachusetts 146 335 0.44 Michigan 1,177 1,769 0.67 Minnesota 2,246 1,594 1.41
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303886A9.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303886A9.txt
  • International All Interstate Switched Services Switched Services Switched Services Switched Services 1984 $0.32 NA NA NA 1985 0.31 NA NA NA 1986 0.28 NA NA NA 1987 0.25 NA NA NA 1988 0.23 NA NA NA 1989 0.22 NA NA NA 1990 0.20 NA NA NA 1991 0.20 NA NA NA 1992 0.19 $0.19 $1.01 $0.15 1993 0.19 0.19 1.02 0.15 1994 0.18 0.18 0.93 0.14 1995 NA 0.17 0.91 0.12 1996 NA 0.16 0.76 0.12 1997 NA 0.15 0.69 0.11 1998 NA 0.14 0.58 0.11 1999 NA 0.14 0.54 0.11 2000 NA 0.12 0.52 0.09 2001 NA 0.10 0.35 0.08 2002 NA 0.09 0.28 0.07 2003 NA 0.08 0.21 0.06 2004 NA 0.08 0.14 0.06 2005 NA 0.07 0.10 0.07
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-304792A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-304792A1.txt
  • 21,094 to 84,375 CPS and data, Aeronautical 1631.5000 - 1645.5000 MHz 200KG7W DSSS, BPSK, 21,094 to 84,375 CPS and data, Aeronautical 1545.0000 - 1559.0000 MHz 200KG7W DSSS, BPSK, 21,094 to 84,375 CPS and data, Aeronautical 1530.0000 - 1544.0000 MHz 200KG7W SITE ID: MSAT 1&2-T&P 20430 CENTURY BOULEVARD (half-duplex MESs using MSAT-1 & MSAT-2), MONTGOMERY, GERMANTOWN, MD LOCATION: SCI Systems MSAT1&2(1) 0.15 meters ANTENNA ID: MT-2010 internal 10.20 dBW DSSS, BPSK, 21,094 to 84,375 CPS, Data, Marine & Land Mobile 1646.5000 - 1660.5000 MHz 168KG1D 10.20 dBW DSSS, BPSK, 21,094 to 84,375 CPS, Data, Marine & Land Mobile 1631.5000 - 1645.5000 MHz 168KG1D DSSS, BPSK, 21,094 to 84,375 CPS, Data, Marine & Land Mobile 1545.0000 - 1559.0000 MHz 168KG1D DSSS, BPSK, 21,094
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-304937A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-304937A1.txt
  • transmission rate of 3375 bps 1626.5000 - 1660.5000 MHz 5K00G7W FDMA communications channel (voice or data) using differentially encoded QPSK at a transmission rate of 3375 bps 1525.0000 - 1559.0000 MHz 5K00G7W Page 7 of 17 TDM signaling channel using differentially encoded QPSK at a transmission rate of 3375 bps (GC-S-data) 1525.0000 - 1559.0000 MHz 5K00G7W CAL / Calquest A12 0.15 meters ANTENNA ID: CQ100 16.50 dBW TDMA signaling channel using differentially encoded QPSK at a transmission rate of 3375 bps (MT-ST-data) 1626.5000 - 1660.5000 MHz 5K00G7W 16.50 dBW Slotted Aloha signaling channel using differentially encoded QPSK at a transmission rate of 3375 bps (MT-SR-data) 1626.5000 - 1660.5000 MHz 5K00G7W 16.50 dBW FDMA communications channel (voice or data) using differentially encoded
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-305080A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-305080A1.txt
  • dBW DSSS, BPSK, 21,094 to 157,500 CPS, Data, Land Mobile 1631.5000 - 1645.5000 MHz 168KG1D 0.00 dBW DSSS, BPSK, 21,094 to 157,500 CPS, Data, Land Mobile 1545.0000 - 1559.0000 MHz 168KG1D 0.00 dBW DSSS, BPSK, 21,094 to 157,500 CPS, Data, Land Mobile 1530.0000 - 1544.0000 MHz 168KG1D SITE ID: ISAT/HD 20430 CENTURY BOULEVARD, MONTGOMERY, GERMANTOWN, MD LOCATION: Sensor Systems 2-2010/EXT 0.15 meters ANTENNA ID: S65-8582-101 12.10 dBW DSSS,BPSK, 21,094 to 84,375 CPS, Data, Aeronautical 1646.5000 - 1660.5000 MHz 200KG7W 12.10 dBW DSSS,BPSK, 21,094 to 84,375 CPS, Data, Aeronautical 1631.5000 - 1645.5000 MHz 200KG7W 0.00 dBW DSSS,BPSK, 21,094 to 84,375 CPS, Data, Aeronautical 1545.0000 - 1559.0000 MHz 200KG7W Page 3 of 22 0.00 dBW DSSS,BPSK, 21,094 to 84,375 CPS, Data, Aeronautical 1530.0000
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-305296A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-305296A1.txt
  • 15 Residential Fixed Connections (Approximating the National Broadband Availability Target) and Households by State as of June 30, 2010 (Connections with advertised speeds at least 3 mbps down and 768 up and households, in thousands) State Connections Households Subscribership Ratio Alabama 337 1,867 0.18 Alaska * 252 * American Samoa 0 9 0.00 Arizona 926 2,464 0.38 Arkansas 177 1,144 0.15 California 4,773 12,634 0.38 Colorado 919 1,978 0.46 Connecticut 628 1,358 0.46 Delaware 207 343 0.60 District of Columbia 131 270 0.48 Florida 2,592 7,344 0.35 Georgia 989 3,697 0.27 Guam * 39 * Hawaii * 436 * Idaho 72 575 0.12 Illinois 1,499 4,803 0.31 Indiana 713 2,493 0.29 Iowa 174 1,197 0.15 Kansas 243 1,101 0.22 Kentucky 471
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-305582A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-305582A1.txt
  • encoded QPSK at a transmission rate of 3375 bps 1626.5000 - 1660.5000 MHz 5K00G7W FDMA communications channel (voice or data) using differentially encoded QPSK at a transmission rate of 3375 bps 1525.0000 - 1559.0000 MHz 5K00G7W TDM signaling channel using differentially encoded QPSK at a transmission rate of 3375 bps (GC-S-data) 1525.0000 - 1559.0000 MHz 5K00G7W CAL / Calquest A12 0.15 meters ANTENNA ID: CQ100 16.50 dBW TDMA signaling channel using differentially encoded QPSK at a transmission rate of 3375 bps (MT-ST-data) 1626.5000 - 1660.5000 MHz 5K00G7W 16.50 dBW Slotted Aloha signaling channel using differentially encoded QPSK at a transmission rate of 3375 bps (MT-SR-data) 1626.5000 - 1660.5000 MHz 5K00G7W 16.50 dBW FDMA communications channel (voice or data) using differentially encoded
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-306445A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-306445A1.txt
  • of Service: Fixed Satellite Service Application granted to extend the special term of 2 years until both MSAT-1 AND MSAT-2 cease operation of its blanket mobile earth terminal license, E990143, per the terms of the Commission's Order and Authorization in SES-AMD-20070907-01251, DA 09-906, rel. 5/15/09. SITE ID: 1 25,000 half-duplex data METs, CONUS, ALASKA, HAWAI LOCATION: SCI SYSTEMS, INC. A1/INT 0.15 meters ANTENNA ID: MT-2010 Internal 10.20 dBW DSSS, BPSK, 84, 375 CPS, DATA, MARINE & LAND MOBILE 1646.5000 - 1660.5000 MHz 168KG1D Page 1 of 19 10.20 dBW DSSS, BPSK, 84, 375 CPS, DATA, MARINE & LAND MOBILE 1631.5000 - 1645.5000 MHz 168KG1D DSSS, BPSK, 84, 375 CPS, DATA, MARINE & LAND MOBILE 1545.0000 - 1559.0000 MHz 168KG1D DSSS, BPSK,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-308380A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-308380A1.txt
  • to 157,500 CPS, Data, Land Mobile 1631.5000 - 1645.5000 MHz 168KG1D 0.00 dBW DSSS, BPSK, 21,094 to 157,500 CPS, Data, Land Mobile 1545.0000 - 1559.0000 MHz 168KG1D 0.00 dBW DSSS, BPSK, 21,094 to 157,500 CPS, Data, Land Mobile 1530.0000 - 1544.0000 MHz 168KG1D Page 4 of 32 SITE ID: ISAT/HD 20430 CENTURY BOULEVARD, MONTGOMERY, GERMANTOWN, MD LOCATION: Sensor Systems 2-2010/EXT 0.15 meters ANTENNA ID: S65-8582-101 12.10 dBW DSSS,BPSK, 21,094 to 84,375 CPS, Data, Aeronautical 1646.5000 - 1660.5000 MHz 200KG7W 12.10 dBW DSSS,BPSK, 21,094 to 84,375 CPS, Data, Aeronautical 1631.5000 - 1645.5000 MHz 200KG7W 0.00 dBW DSSS,BPSK, 21,094 to 84,375 CPS, Data, Aeronautical 1545.0000 - 1559.0000 MHz 200KG7W 0.00 dBW DSSS,BPSK, 21,094 to 84,375 CPS, Data, Aeronautical 1530.0000 - 1544.0000 MHz 200KG7W
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-308869A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-308869A1.txt
  • Station Application for Modification GeoLogic Solutions, Inc. Nature of Service: Mobile Satellite Service "MOD" to permit GeoLogic to operate its authorized half-duplex METS in the upper L-band until September 30, 2013. SITE ID: 2 30,000 half-duplex METs in CONUS, AK, HI PR, USVI & coastal areas up to 200 miles, offshore LOCATION: Page 9 of 13 VISTAR Telecommunications, Inc. 3(Upper-L) 0.15 meters ANTENNA ID: 1000000 6.00 dBW Multimode Mobile Messaging Service 1646.5000 - 1660.5000 MHz 2K40G1D Multimode Mobile Messaging Service 1545.0000 - 1559.0000 MHz 2K40G1D SITE ID: 1 50,100 half duplex METs in CONUS, AK, HI PR, USVI & coastal areas up to 200 miles, offshores LOCATION: VISTAR TELECOMMUNICATIONS, INC. 3(lower-L) 0.15 meters ANTENNA ID: 1000000 standard C 6.00 dBW OQPSK/packet
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-309962A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-309962A1.txt
  • - 1645.5000 MHz 168KG1D 11.30 dBW DSSS, BPSK, 21,094 TO 84, 375 CPS AND DATA, MARINE, LAND MOBILE 1646.5000 - 1660.5000 MHz 168KG1D DSSS, BPSK, 21,094 TO 84, 375 CPS AND DATA, MARINE, LAND MOBILE 1530.0000 - 1544.0000 MHz 168KG1D DSSS, BPSK, 21,094 TO 84, 375 CPS AND DATA, MARINE, LAND MOBILE 1545.0000 - 1559.0000 MHz 168KG1D SCI SYSTEMS 1 0.15 meters ANTENNA ID: MT-2010 INTERNAL DSSS, BPSK, 21,094 TO 84, 375 CPS AND DATA, MARINE, LAND MOBILE 1530.0000 - 1544.0000 MHz 168KG1D DSSS, BPSK, 21,094 TO 84, 375 CPS AND DATA, MARINE, LAND MOBILE 1545.0000 - 1559.0000 MHz 168KG1D 10.20 dBW DSSS, BPSK, 21,094 TO 84, 375 CPS AND DATA, MARINE, LAND MOBILE 1646.5000 - 1660.5000 MHz 168KG1D 10.20 dBW
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-310205A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-310205A1.txt
  • actions are the dates specified. E900081 SES-MOD-20110722-00850 E Date Effective: 09/29/2011 Class of Station: Mobile Earth Station Grant of Authority 09/30/2011 - 09/30/2013 Application for Modification GeoLogic Solutions, Inc. Nature of Service: Mobile Satellite Service SITE ID: 1 19,000 half-duplex METs in CONUS, AK, HI PR, USVI & coastal areas up to 200 miles, offshore LOCATION: VISTAR Telecommunications, Inc. 1(Upper-L) 0.15 meters ANTENNA ID: 1000000 6.00 dBW Multimode Mobile Messaging Service 1646.5000 - 1660.5000 MHz 2K40G1D Multimode Mobile Messaging Service 1545.0000 - 1559.0000 MHz 2K40G1D Points of Communication: 1 - MSAT-1 - (106.5 W.L.) 1 - MSAT-2 - (103.3 W.L.) 1 - SKYTERRA 1 - (101.3 W.L.) E000623 SES-MOD-20110815-00960 E Date Effective: 10/04/2011 Class of Station: Fixed Earth Stations Grant of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-310261A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-310261A1.txt
  • 1,867 0.21 Alaska * 252 * American Samoa 0 9 0.00 Arizona 988 2,464 0.40 Arkansas 202 1,144 0.18 California 5,137 12,634 0.41 Colorado 988 1,978 0.50 Connecticut 658 1,358 0.48 Delaware 210 343 0.61 District of Columbia 137 270 0.51 Florida 2,883 7,344 0.39 Georgia 1,104 3,697 0.30 Guam * 39 * Hawaii * 436 * Idaho 85 575 0.15 Illinois 1,588 4,803 0.33 Indiana 760 2,493 0.30 Iowa 194 1,197 0.16 Kansas 251 1,101 0.23 Kentucky 511 1,718 0.30 Louisiana 466 1,694 0.28 Maine 104 539 0.19 Maryland 1,304 2,158 0.60 Massachusetts 1,640 2,568 0.64 Michigan 1,369 3,808 0.36 Minnesota 792 2,046 0.39 Mississippi 124 1,098 0.11 Missouri 479 2,374 0.20 Montana 118 394 0.30 Nebraska 230 709 0.32
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-310809A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-310809A1.txt
  • - 1645.5000 MHz 168KG1D 11.30 dBW DSSS, BPSK, 21,094 TO 84, 375 CPS AND DATA, MARINE, LAND MOBILE 1646.5000 - 1660.5000 MHz 168KG1D DSSS, BPSK, 21,094 TO 84, 375 CPS AND DATA, MARINE, LAND MOBILE 1530.0000 - 1544.0000 MHz 168KG1D DSSS, BPSK, 21,094 TO 84, 375 CPS AND DATA, MARINE, LAND MOBILE 1545.0000 - 1559.0000 MHz 168KG1D SCI SYSTEMS 1 0.15 meters ANTENNA ID: MT-2010 INTERNAL DSSS, BPSK, 21,094 TO 84, 375 CPS AND DATA, MARINE, LAND MOBILE 1530.0000 - 1544.0000 MHz 168KG1D DSSS, BPSK, 21,094 TO 84, 375 CPS AND DATA, MARINE, LAND MOBILE 1545.0000 - 1559.0000 MHz 168KG1D 10.20 dBW DSSS, BPSK, 21,094 TO 84, 375 CPS AND DATA, MARINE, LAND MOBILE 1646.5000 - 1660.5000 MHz 168KG1D 10.20 dBW
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-311775A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-311775A1.txt
  • 0.21 6.16 07/01/96 06/30/97 0.72 0.89 1.95 0.17 6.04 07/01/97 12/31/97 0.64 0.84 1.63 0.14 5.18 01/01/98 06/30/98 0.68 0.23 1.29 0.21 4.04 07/01/98 12/31/98 0.91 0.20 0.99 0.30 3.82 01/01/99 06/30/99 0.82 0.16 0.98 0.32 3.71 07/01/99 12/31/99 0.37 0.10 0.86 0.28 2.82 01/01/00 06/30/00 0.32 0.10 0.86 0.31 2.85 08/11/00 06/31/004 0.23 0.07 0.52 0.26 1.91 07/01/01 12/31/01 0.15 0.07 0.48 0.24 1.71 01/01/02 06/30/02 0.15 0.07 0.47 0.24 1.69 07/01/02 06/30/03 0.02 0.01 0.48 0.22 1.46 07/01/03 06/30/04 0.00 0.00 0.48 0.22 1.44 07/01/04 06/30/05 0.00 0.00 0.50 0.25 1.53 07/01/05 06/30/06 0.00 0.00 0.52 0.25 1.59 07/01/06 06/30/07 0.01 0.00 0.54 0.25 1.63 07/01/07 06/30/08 0.01 0.00 0.56 0.26 1.71 07/01/08 06/30/09 0.01 0.00 0.63 0.24 1.80
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-130A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-130A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-130A1.txt
  • of 0.10 percent. In the same month, the trouble report rate for central office network troubles (MR 2-03) for competitors providing UNE-P services was 0.52 percent, as compared to 0.09 percent for Verizon's retail customers, a difference of 0.43 percent. In November 2000, the trouble report rate for central office network troubles (MR 2-03) for competitors providing UNE-P services was 0.15 percent, as compared to 0.08 percent for Verizon's retail customers, a difference of 0.07 percent. In December 2000, the network trouble report rate (MR 2-01) for competitors providing resale special services was 0.35 percent, as compared to 0.23 percent for Verizon's retail customers, a difference of 0.12 percent. In the same month, the trouble report rate for central office network
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-208A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-208A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-208A1.txt
  • misleading, because loop orders that are late and have not been completed are not reflected in Verizon's performance metrics. Covad contends that the New York Commission adopted a ``held orders'' metric - which shows the number of orders submitted but not fulfilled - to address this flaw in the performance measures. Covad points to the February data, which shows only 0.15 percent of Verizon retail orders still open after 30 days, while 4.07% of competitors' orders remain open after 30 days. Covad Comments at 10. Verizon notes that the Commission has never relied on the ``held orders'' data in analyzing compliance with checklist item 4, and contends that this measure is significantly flawed because it includes orders that could not be
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-208A2.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-208A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-208A2.txt
  • Sent on Time - Verizon Orig. 100 NA NA NA 1a PO-4-01 % Notices Sent on Time - TC Orig. 100 NA NA NA 1a Billing BI-1-02 Billing - % DUF in 4 Business Days 99.20 97.45 99.34 99.80 BI-2-01 Timeliness of Carrier Bill 98.16 99.96 99.12 96.89 BI-3-01 % Billing Adjustments - Dollars Adjusted 0.04 2.38 0.03 1.73 0.05 0.15 0.03 2.63 BI-3-02 % Billing Adjustments - Number of Adjustments 0.21 2.80 0.17 0.15 0.22 0.02 0.16 0.00 OS/DA Average Speed of Answer OD-1-01 Operator Services - NY OSC 1.6 0.17 1.96 1.86 0.17 1.84 0.18 OD-1-02 Directory Assistance - NY/MA OSC 1.53 4.97 4.85 2.66 4.41 3.48 OD-1-02 Directory Assistance - NY OSC 4.0 OD-1-02 Directory Assistance - MA
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-208A3.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-208A3.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-208A3.txt
  • in 4 Business Days 95.21 81.62 99.47 99.38 BI-2-01 Timeliness of Carrier Bill 98.16 100.00 100.00 95.00 BI-3-01 % Billing Adjustments - Dollars Adjusted 0.02 0.00 0.02 0.00 0.04 0.00 0.02 0.00 BI-3-02 % Billing Adjustments - Number of Adjustments 0.17 0.00 0.11 0.00 0.16 0.00 0.10 0.00 OS/DA Average Speed of Answer OD-1-01 Operator Services - NY OSC 1.58 0.15 1.96 0.17 1.86 0.17 1.84 0.18 OD-1-02 Directory Assistance - NY/MA OSC 4.26 1.37 5.54 1.53 5.20 2.66 4.73 3.48 OD-1-02 Directory Assistance - NY OSC OD-1-02 Directory Assistance - MA OSC Resale: Ordering All Resale Orders OR-7-01 % Order Confirm./Rejects sent w/in 3 Business Days 95.16 98.53 100.00 98.59 OR-8-01 % Acknowledgements on Time 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 1b,3c,4c
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-107A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-107A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-107A1.txt
  • PEG † 1.9 2.0 0.1 5.3% 2.2 2.3 0.1 4.5% Standard error 0.20 0.21 0.18 0.19 Leased access 0.8 0.8 0.0 0.0% 0.5 0.6 0.1 20.0% Standard error 0.11 0.11 0.06 0.06 Other local 0.7 0.8 0.1 14.3% 0.9 0.9 0.0 0.0% Standard error 0.11 0.17 0.09 0.09 Children's satellite 2.7 2.8 0.1 3.7% 2.5 2.6 0.1 4.0% Standard error 0.15 0.15 0.09 0.09 Sports satellite 3.8 3.9 0.1 2.6% 3.3 3.5 0.2 6.1% Standard error 0.21 0.20 0.12 0.13 Other satellite 36.9 39.7 2.8 7.6% 36.3 38.7 2.4 6.6% Standard error 1.47 1.53 0.75 0.82 Total of above 57.5 60.9 3.4 5.9% 56.2 59.3 3.1 5.5% Standard error 1.45 1.46 1.00 0.97 Other Channels ††† Devoted to analog service 11.7
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-10A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-10A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-10A1.txt
  • Plan and manage the administrative affairs of the Commission with respect to the functions of personnel and position management; labor-management relations; training; budget and financial management; information management and processing; organization planning; management analysis; procurement; office space management and utilization; administrative and office services; supply and property management; records management; personnel and physical security; and international telecommunications settlements. 4. Section 0.15 is amended by revising paragraph (e) to read as follows: OFFICE OF MEDIA RELATIONS § 0.15 Functions of the Office. * * * * * (e) Maintain liaison with the Consumer and Governmental Affairs Bureau on press and media issues concerning consumer assistance and information including informal consumer complaints. 5. Section 0.17 is amended by revising the Office name and
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-116A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-116A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-116A1.txt
  • 0.79 54 -180 -19.2 108 -180 -25 162 -180 -29.7 1 -180 0.96 55 -180 -24.5 109 -180 -23.2 163 -180 -36.8 2 -180 0.95 56 -180 -27.1 110 -180 -23.5 164 -180 -35.6 3 -180 0.81 57 -180 -24.7 111 -180 -26.5 165 -180 -39.9 4 -180 0.45 58 -180 -32.8 112 -180 -23.9 166 -180 -40.5 5 -180 -0.15 59 -180 -31.3 113 -180 -22.3 167 -180 -29.4 6 -180 -0.38 60 -180 -20.5 114 -180 -22.5 168 -180 -24.6 7 -180 -0.66 61 -180 -19.3 115 -180 -22.7 169 -180 -24.3 8 -180 -1.8 62 -180 -19.6 116 -180 -24.2 170 -180 -31.9 9 -180 -2.72 63 -180 -17.4 117 -180 -29.2 171 -180 -32.3 10 -180 -2.93
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-157A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-157A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-157A1.txt
  • the following table, as measured using a 50 µH/50 ohms line impedance stabilization network (LISN). Compliance with the provisions of this paragraph shall be based on the measurement of the radio frequency voltage between each power line and ground at the power terminal. The lower limit applies at the band edges. Frequency of Emission (MHz) Conducted Limit (dBµV) Quasi-peak Average 0.15-0.5 0.5-5 5-30 66 to 56* 56 60 56 to 46* 46 50 *Decreases with the logarithm of the frequency. (b) For a Class A digital device that is designed to be connected to the public utility (AC) power line, the radio frequency voltage that is conducted back onto the AC power line on any frequency or frequencies within the band
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-191A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-191A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-191A1.txt
  • the Commission's Rules to reflect the new structure of the Office of Media Relations to include the management of audio and visual support services for the Commission. The amendments adopted herein pertain to agency organization, procedure and practice. Consequently, the notice and comment provisions of the Administrative Procedure Act contained in 5 U.S.C. §553(b), are inapplicable. Title 47 U.S.C. § 0.15 is amended as: The authority citation for Part 0 continues to read as follows: AUTHORITY: Secs. 5, 48 Stat. 1068, as amended; 47 U.S.C. 155, 225, unless otherwise noted. Section 0.15 is amended to read as follows: OFFICE OF MEDIA RELATIONS § 0.15 Functions of the Office. * * * * * Manage the FCC's audio/visual support services and maintain
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-22A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-22A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-22A1.txt
  • percentage calculated for each of these 25 carriers, and the amount per payphone per month to be paid by each of these 25 carriers. For example, AT&T Communications, Inc. is listed with a percentage of 56.69 percent and an amount to be paid of $25.9923406 per payphone per month, while American Network Exchange, Inc. is listed with a percentage of 0.15 percent and an amount to be paid of $0.0689597 per payphone per month. 20. Instead of providing a list of carriers with a duty to pay interim compensation as was done in the First Report and Order, the Commission finds it appropriate at this time to identify carriers obligated to pay interim compensation by reference to the Carrier Locator report
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-330A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-330A1.txt
  • 3.89 tbd 8.75 tbd 3.64 tbd 1 - 106007Avg Resp Pre-Order Mech Loop Qual Actual - EDI- CORBA: Rndtrp 10.7610.34 16.23 9.60 11.2011.94 17.8112.10 15.6812.17 1 - 106008Avg Resp Pre-Order Mech Loop Qual Design - EDI- CORBA: Rndtrp 1.42 2.58 2.32 2.27 1.69 2.41 3.23 2.89 2.75a d 2 - 200100Resale Res 0.17 0.33 0.13 0.33 0.12 0.33 0.16 0.33 0.15 0.33 2 - 200200Elct Resale Bus 0.15 0.33 0.03 0.33 0.03 0.33 0.05 0.33 0.14 0.33 2 - 201101Elct 8.0 dB and 5.5 dB Loop 0.07 0.33 0.06 0.33 0.08 0.33 0.30 0.33 0.08 0.33 2 - 201200Elct 2 Digital ISDN 0.02 0.33 0.02 0.33 0.06 0.33 0.06 0.33 0.11 0.33abcde Federal Communications Commission FCC 02-330 California Performance Metric Data
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-48A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-48A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-48A1.txt
  • of 0.25 and minimum bandwidth of 1.5 GHz limit be reduced from that proposed in the Notice due to the use of -10 dB rather than the -20 dB emission points. SME and Valeo, for example, requested a fractional bandwidth of around 0.17 and an upper bandwidth limit of one gigahertz. Siemens requests that the fractional bandwidth be reduced to 0.15 with a 1 GHz upper bandwidth limit. Bosch requests a fractional bandwidth of 0.15-0.20 and a minimum bandwidth of one to 1.5 gigahertz. ANRO and Kohler request a fractional bandwidth of 0.20. Daimler Chrysler requested an upper bandwidth limit of one gigahertz. Delphi requested that a minimum bandwidth of 500 MHz be used to define UWB, regardless of center frequency,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-63A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-63A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-63A1.txt
  • 66.67 27.27 MR-4-08-3342 % Out of Service > 24 Hours 23.1 22.73 20 11.11 44.44 5.88 28 16.67 8.33 0 MR-5 - Repeat Trouble Reports MR-5-01-3342 % Repeat Reports within 30 Days 30.8 42.31 45.45 30.77 33.33 52.63 61.54 33.33 33.33 30.77 2-Wire xDSL Line Sharing - Maintenance MR-2 - Trouble Report Rate MR-2-02-3343 Network Trouble Report Rate - Loop 0.15 0 0.13 0 0.12 0 0.17 0 0.07 0 1,2,3,4,5 MR-2-03-3343 Network Trouble Report Rate - Central Office 0.04 0 0.04 0 0.04 0 0.13 0 0.03 0 1,2,3,4,5 MR-3 - Missed Repair Appointments MR-3-01-3343 % Missed Repair Appointment - Loop 0 NA 14.29 NA 0 NA 35.71 NA 0 NA MR-3-02-3343 % Missed Repair Appointment - Central Office 0
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-130A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-130A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-130A1.txt
  • 22.911 is amended by revising paragraph (a)(2) to read as follows: § 22.911 Cellular geographic service area. * * * * * (a) * * * (2) The distance from a cell transmitting antenna located in the Gulf of Mexico Service Area (GMSA) to its SAB along each cardinal radial is calculated as follows: d = 6.895 × h0.30 × p0.15 where: d is the radial distance in kilometers h is the radial antenna HAAT in meters p is the radial ERP in Watts * * * * * 2. Section 22.912 is amended by revising paragraphs (a) and (b) as follows: § 22.912 Service area boundary extensions. * * * * * (a) De minimis extensions. Except as otherwise provided
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-136A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-136A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-136A1.txt
  • Very Large Large Medium Small Very Small July 2002 BST $11.89 $11.38 $15.05 $20.20 $22.02 Standard error † 0.33 0.28 0.70 1.13 1.53 CPST $25.55 $25.48 $21.75 $15.59 $9.19 Standard error 0.43 0.46 0.78 1.41 2.07 Programming total $37.44 $36.86 $36.80 $35.79 $31.21 Standard error 0.37 0.43 0.28 0.62 1.15 Equipment $4.45 $4.34 $3.46 $2.46 $0.65 Standard error 0.12 0.12 0.15 0.29 0.26 Programming & equipment $41.89 $41.20 $40.26 $38.25 $31.86 Standard error 0.40 0.45 0.35 0.76 1.24 Channels 68.9 65.9 63.29 53.0 38.1 Standard error 0.8 0.9 0.8 1.6 3.2 Rate per channel $0.613 $0.636 $0.651 $0.753 $0.979 Standard error 0.007 0.010 0.010 0.021 0.073 Satellite channels 49.8 48.3 47.3 42.2 29.2 Standard error 0.7 0.8 0.7 1.4 2.9 Rate
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-15A4.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-15A4.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-15A4.txt
  • MSV Reply, Technical App. at 14. See Boeing April 8, 2002 Ex Parte Letter at 10. See generally Inmarsat May 10, 2002 Ex Parte Letter, Attach. at i-v. See Inmarsat May 21, 2002 Ex Parte Letter, Attach. at 1-12. Specifically, MSV claims that satellite pointing errors of 0.04 degrees in roll and 0.05 degrees in pitch are possible. Inmarsat adds 0.15 degrees simultaneously in all directions to its description of the MSV's beam patterns. See Inmarsat May 21, 2002 Ex Parte Letter at 5. See NTIA Nov. 12, 2002 Ex Parte Letter, Encl. 4 at 1-7. See MSV Jan. 11, 2002 Ex Parte at 22 (providing estimate of fully loaded MSS system). See MSV Jan. 10, 2002 Ex Parte Letter at
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-15A4_Erratum.doc
  • MSV Reply, Technical App. at 14. See Boeing April 8, 2002 Ex Parte Letter at 10. See generally Inmarsat May 10, 2002 Ex Parte Letter, Attach. at i-v. See Inmarsat May 21, 2002 Ex Parte Letter, Attach. at 1-12. Specifically, MSV claims that satellite pointing errors of 0.04 degrees in roll and 0.05 degrees in pitch are possible. Inmarsat adds 0.15 degrees simultaneously in all directions to its description of the MSV's beam patterns. See Inmarsat May 21, 2002 Ex Parte Letter at 5. See NTIA Nov. 12, 2002 Ex Parte Letter, Encl. 4 at 1-7. See MSV Jan. 11, 2002 Ex Parte at 22 (providing estimate of fully loaded MSS system). See MSV Jan. 10, 2002 Ex Parte Letter at
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03J-2A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03J-2A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03J-2A1.txt
  • Lifeline regression specification 1. The dependent variable is the number of households taking Lifeline divided by the number of households that are at or below 1.5 times the poverty level (%HHBelowOnePtFiveTakingLifeline). For example, Texas had 263,934 Lifeline subscribers in 2000, and 1,575,172 households at or below 1.5 times the poverty line. The dependent variable data point for Texas therefore equals 0.15 (=263,934/1,348,089). The first Independent Variable is IncEligAbv125. For each state, IncEligAbv125 equals that state's income eligibility level (if it has one) minus 1.25. So, for California, which has an income eligibility criterion of 1.5 times the poverty level, IncEligAbv125 equals 0.25 (= 1.5 - 1.25). For states with an income eligibility criterion at or below 1.25 times the poverty level,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-12A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-12A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-12A1.txt
  • 1.15 0.84 0.20 0.06 0.03 5% Trimmed $8.07 $5.59 $1.58 $0.61 $0.13 Wireless competition ** Average $2.12 $2.58 $0.81 $0.23 $0.02 Observations 29 29 29 29 29 Standard error 1.16 0.61 0.17 0.05 0.01 5% Trimmed $2.07 $2.49 $0.79 $0.22 $0.02 Low penetration test Average $7.96 -$0.14 $1.25 $0.55 $0.09 Observations 36 36 36 36 36 Standard error 1.43 2.19 0.15 0.08 0.03 5% Trimmed $7.10 $1.52 $1.26 $0.53 $0.06 * Operating Expense does not include the following expenses: Corporate overhead, depreciation and amortization, interest expense, losses from sale or disposition of property, and extraordinary expenses. ** These averages include cable system prices in communities with an Effective Competition finding based on DBS or wireless competition, but not the prices charged
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-13A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-13A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-13A1.txt
  • 0.36 27.4% 0 0.0% Italy 20.9 2.85 13.6% 0 0.0% 2.85 13.6% 0 0.0% Japan 48.5 12.17 25.1% 4.0 8.24% 6.2 12.8% No data No data Luxembourg 0.2 0.01 5.3% 0 1.0% 0.01 4.2% 0 0.0% Netherlands 7.1 0.69 9.7% 0.11 1.6% 0.55 7.8% 0.03 0.4% Portugal 3.1 0.51 16.2% 0.02 0.6% 0.49 15.6% 0 0.0% Spain 12.6 2.38 18.9% 0.15 1.2% 2.06 16.4% 0.17 1.3% Sweden 4.5 1.25 28.0% 0.17 3.8% 0.88 19.7% 0.2 4.5% U.K. 24.4 13.14 53.8% 2.29 9.4% 8.04 32.9% 2.81 11.5% U.S. 106.6 41.75 40.0% 21.5 20.2% 20.25 19.0% 0.85 0.8% Terrestrial, Cable, and Satellite Competition In contrast to the United States, the majority of European households continue to receive television by terrestrial means, with 46
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-179A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-179A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-179A1.txt
  • January 1, 2005 Sample Groups Overall Non-Comp. Sample Communities With a Finding of Effective Competition by Primary Basis for Finding Sample Group Overall Communities with a Second Cable Operator DBS Wire-less LP Test Sub-group Overall First Cable System Rival Cable System Monthly Equipment Charges Analog converter & remote control $4.39 $4.38 $4.54 $4.29 $4.86 $2.69 $4.43 $5.12 $5.22 Standard error 0.15 0.13 0.32 0.37 0.39 0.31 0.24 0.24 1.00 Prior year (1/1/04) $4.17 $4.16 $4.28 $4.08 $4.62 $2.55 $4.04 $4.99 $4.89 Digital converter & remote control $4.99 $4.98 $5.07 $5.31 $5.66 $4.32 $4.77 $5.42 $2.87 Standard error 0.13 0.12 0.26 0.33 0.28 0.47 0.14 0.26 0.64 Prior year (1/1/04) $4.81 $4.80 $4.85 $5.09 $5.48 $4.01 $4.49 $5.28 $2.76 HD converter &
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-169A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-169A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-169A1.txt
  • 9786, 9791, ¶ 32 (CSB, 1995) (denying exclusivity petition for the Sci-Fi Channel). The following data demonstrates that the three programming networks for which exclusivity was denied (Court TV, Speed, and Sci-Fi Channel) have prospered despite the lack of exclusivity. Court TV's subscribership increased from 16.1 million in 1994 to 87.9 million in 2006, and its prime-time ratings increased from 0.15 in 1994 to 0.81 in 2005. See Kagan Research, LLC, Economics of Basic Cable Networks - 13th Annual Edition at 37-38, 50-52 (2007) (``Kagan Report 13th Edition''); Kagan Research, LLC, Economics of Basic Cable Networks - 9th Annual Edition at 42, 44 (2003) (``Kagan Report 9th Edition''). OLN's (now known as Versus) subscribership increased from 18 million in 1998 to
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-208A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-208A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-208A1.txt
  • between the monthly gross subscriber revenue per channel and the monthly per subscriber affiliation fee paid for that channel by the cable operator. This value represents the implicit fee for the individual channel. (iii) To determine the marginal channels on the tier for systems with 55 or more activated channels, multiply the number of non-mandated channels on the tier by 0.15 and round to the nearest number. To determine the marginal channels on the tier for systems with 54 or less activated channels, multiply the number of non-mandated channels on the tier by 0.10 and round to the nearest number. That is the number of marginal channels. Next identify the channels with the lowest implicit fee until that number is reached.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-28A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-28A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-28A1.txt
  • Countries Country Number of Players Penetration (%) Prepaid (% of Subs) MOUs Revenue per Minute ($) Data (% of ARPU) Mobile Party Pays USA 4+ 77 14 838 0.05 12 Canada 3 58 23 420 0.12 10 Hong Kong 5 108 76 460 0.04 9 Singapore 3 106 39 338 0.08 22 Calling Party Pays UK 5 117 66 154 0.15 24 Germany 4 104 53 94 0.24 21 Italy 4 138 90 117 0.22 19 Sweden 4 116 54 164 0.16 7 France 3 79 35 254 0.16 15 Finland 3 114 19 304 0.11 14 Japan 3 78 3 145 0.26 29 South Korea 3 83 3 316 0.11 19 Australia 4 98 50 193 0.16 21 Source: Interactive
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-103A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-103A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-103A1.txt
  • Prepaid (% of Subs) MOUs RPM ($) Voice Only ARPU ($) Data (% of ARPU) Receiving Party Pays USA 93 19 824 0.04 49.91 29.3 Canada 68 20 426 0.09 55.14 22.1 Singapore 144 50 380 0.06 33.01 31.0 Calling Party Pays UK 129 59 194 0.11 33.52 33 Germany 132 56 109 0.16 22.08 29.8 Italy 147 87 141 0.15 29.12 26.1 Sweden 131 35 211 0.10 31.11 25.3 France 96 33 237 0.15 48.40 23.7 Finland 144 13 218 0.13 33.52 20.5 Japan 88 1 137 0.25 58.06 44.5 South Korea 99 3 311 0.09 33.63 19.1 Australia 115 42 222 0.14 47.27 36.1 ARPU above, the relatively high average monthly subscriber bill in Japan reflects two key factors
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-103A1_Rcd.pdf
  • of Pops) Prepaid (% of Subs)MOUs RPM ($) Voice OnlyARPU ($) Data (% of ARPU) Receiving Party Pays USA 93 19 824 0.04 49.91 29.3 Canada 68 20 426 0.09 55.14 22.1 Singapore 144 50 380 0.06 33.01 31.0 Calling Party Pays UK 129 59 194 0.11 33.52 33 Germany 132 56 109 0.16 22.08 29.8 Italy 147 87 141 0.15 29.12 26.1 Sweden 131 35 211 0.10 31.11 25.3 France 96 33 237 0.15 48.40 23.7 Finland 144 13 218 0.13 33.52 20.5 Japan 88 1 137 0.25 58.06 44.5 South Korea 99 3 311 0.09 33.63 19.1 Australia 115 42 222 0.14 47.27 36.1 A. ARPU 390. The average monthly subscriber bill (ARPU) in the United States, at $49.91,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-161A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-161A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-161A1.txt
  • analysis and the proposed cost-estimation function, we conclude that the proposed function will serve our purpose well to estimate costs on an interim basis in wire centers now served by rural price cap carriers, and we adopt it. That cost-estimation function is defined as: ln(Total cost) =7.08 + 0.02 * ln(distance to nearest central office in feet + 1) - 0.15 * ln(number of households + businesses in the wire center + 1) + 0.22 * ln(total road feet in wire center + 1) + 0.06 * (ln(number of households + businesses in wire center + 1)) ^2 - 0.01 * (ln(number of businesses in wire center + 1))^2 - 0.07 * ln((number of households + businesses)/square miles) + 1) The
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-93A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-93A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-93A1.txt
  • in longitude from an adjacent DBS spacecraft by as little as 0.1º. Similarly, a review of DBS orbital parameters indicates that most currently operating DBS satellites are stationkept in the north/south direction to within 0.075º of the equatorial plane. A similar north-south stationkeeping tolerance for a nearby 17/24 GHz BSS space station will yield a worst-case total inclination separation of 0.15º between the two space stations. If we were to adopt a ±20º range for measurements in planes rotated about the Z axis, as proposed by DIRECTV, the submitted transmitting antenna off-axis gain data would cover cases in which DBS and 17/24 GHz BSS spacecraft could be located as close as 0.45º in longitude along the GSO arc. Allowing for a
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-93A1_Rcd.pdf
  • longitude from an adjacent DBS spacecraft by as little as 0.1º.80 26. Similarly, a review of DBS orbital parameters indicates that most currently operating DBS satellites are stationkept in the north/south direction to within 0.075º of the equatorial plane.81A similar north-south stationkeeping tolerance for a nearby 17/24 GHz BSS space station will yield a worst- case total inclination separation of 0.15º between the two space stations.82If we were to adopt a ±20º range for measurements in planes rotated about the Z axis, as proposed by DIRECTV, the submitted transmitting antenna off-axis gain data would cover cases in whichDBS and 17/24 GHz BSS spacecraft could be located as close as 0.45º in longitude along the GSO arc.83Allowing for a worst-case inclination separation
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-96-325A1.pdf
  • a cost study and apply an economic costing methodology within the statutory time frame for arbitrating interconnection disputes, the Commission establishes default ceilings and ranges for the states to apply, on an interim basis, to interconnection arrangements. The Commission establishes a default range of 0.2-0.4 cents per minute for switching. For tandem switching, the Commission establishes a default ceiling of 0.15 cents per minute. The Order also establishes default ceilings for the other unbundled network elements. 7. Access Charges for Unbundled Switching 30. Nothing in this Report and Order alters the collection of access charges paid by an interexchange carrier under Part 69 of the Commission's rules, when the incumbent LEC provides exchange access service to an interexchange carrier, either directly
• http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/in-region_applications/bellsouth_sc/bs271sc.pdf
  • process. 38. Pricing of unbundled network elements satisfies the cost proxies proposed in the FCC Order. Charges for local loops at $18.00 per loop is at the ceiling of the FCC default range. The per minute charge of 0.3¢ for local switching is the midpoint of the FCC default range of 0.2 ¢ to 0.4¢ per minute. The rate of 0.15¢/min for tandem switching is at the FCC default ceiling for this unbundled network element. The rates for these and other elements are subject to a "true up" by the SCPSC intended to adjust rates to economic costs. CLECs would continue to pay the negotiated rate if the true up resulted in a higher rate. If rates fell, they would receive
• http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireline_Competition/Orders/2002/fcc02118.pdf
  • 0 0 a,b,c,d,e PR-8-02-2200 Open Orders in a Hold Status > 90 Days 4.17 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 a,b,c,d,e RESALE (MAINTENANCE) POTS ­ Maintenance MR-2 ­ Trouble Report Rate MR-2-02-2100 Network Trouble Report Rate ­ Loop 0.92 0.26 0.77 0.29 0.57 0.24 0.67 0.2 0.58 0.25 MR-2-03-2100 Network Trouble Report Rate ­ Central Office 0.14 0.15 0.06 0.04 0.04 0.03 0.05 0.06 0.06 0.1 MR-2-04-2100 % Subsequent Reports 11.59 9.64 10.31 0 11.71 1.92 3.92 2.9 MR-2-05-2100 % CPE/TOK/FOK Trouble Report Rate 0.82 0.28 0.65 0.31 0.51 0.15 0.26 0.26 MR-3 ­ Missed Repair Appointments MR-3-01-2110 % Missed Repair Appointment ­ Loop Bus. 16.4 9.76 10.75 8 10.65 13.95 13.94 5.56 16.72 4.76 MR-3-01-2120 % Missed
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2006/DA-06-1646A1.html
  • satellites in the C-band and the Ku-band. Id. at 1-2. 47 C.F.R. S 25.118. August 17, 2005, Fleet Management Notice, Exhibit 2. See Public Notice, "Policy Branch Information," 20 FCC Rcd 15816, 15817-18 (2005). Section 25.210(j) requires that the satellite operate within 0.05'0 of its assigned location. See 47 C.F.R. S 25.210(j). Intelsat's request involved moving the Intelsat 604 spacecraft 0.15'0 from its assigned location. See Request for Special Temporary Authority Intelsat 604, SAT-STA-20060130-00011 filed January 30, 2006. Attachment to STA Grant dated January 30, 2006. Letter from William H. Davenport, Chief, Investigations and Hearings Division, Enforcement Bureau, Federal Communications Commission, to Intelsat North America LLC dated June 21, 2006. See id. at 5. See Letter from Robert L. Pettit, Esq.,
• http://transition.fcc.gov/ftp/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Databases/documents_collection/76-101.html
  • general idea of the magnitude of changes in phase delay occurring in two different types of cable, for different lengths of cable. Change in delay in degrees for cables of specified lengths over a temperature range of -20 to +140 degrees F ------------------Cable Length-------------------- Frequency (kHz) 100 feet 500 feet 1000 feet Dielectric 550 0.016 0.08 0.16 Primarily 1000 0.03 0.15 0.29 Air 1600 0.05 0.24 0.47 Foamed 550 0.09 0.45 0.89 Polyethylene 1000 0.17 0.83 1.7 Dielectric 1600 0.27 1.32 2.65 These figures are representative for phase-stabilized cable of the types shown. Solid dielectric cable may have a phase / temperature coefficient as much as three times as great as cable with foamed polyethylene dielectric, and its use obviously would
• http://transition.fcc.gov/ownership/materials/already-released/consumer090002.pdf
  • 143 57.96 64.25 65.97 68.84 Jul-00 143 51.71 64.34 63.11 Nov-00 143 55.78 61.30 63.90 66.82 Feb-01 143 56.22 62.51 65.35 68.20 May-01 143 55.45 61.21 63.15 66.17 Jul-01 143 49.06 49.57 61.41 49 Table 4: Radio Formats, 1993 & 1997 1993 1997 N % N % Adult Contemp (AC) 462 8.44 AC 418 6.62 AC/Album Oriented Rock (AOR) 8 0.15 AC/AOR 4 0.06 AC/ Contemp. Hit Radio (CHR) 10 0.18 AC/CHR 128 2.03 AC/Full Service (FS) 1 0.02 AC/NR 42 0.67 AC/Oldies (O) 5 0.09 AC/SAC 8 0.13 AOR 565 10.32 AOR 375 5.94 AOR/AC 5 0.09 AOR/AC 3 0.05 Black (B) 281 5.13 AOR/NR 200 3.17 B/AC 13 0.24 AOR/P 80 1.27 B/Gospel (G) 4 0.07 B 236 3.74
• http://transition.fcc.gov/ownership/materials/already-released/programdiversity090002.pdf
  • use this index as a determinant of lack of diversity. While Dominick and Pearce allowed us to evaluate concentration within the top three categories of programming, HHI goes one step further by taking into account all program types on the schedule. The following chart provides the Herfindahl indices for the years being studied. Figure 3 Herfindahl Index 0 0.05 0.1 0.15 0.2 0.25 196619671968196919701971197219731974 19891990199119921993199419951996199719981999200020012002 Year Lower Data Points = Greater Diversity Herfindahl Index As with the Dominick index, the 1970s showed a marked decline in program diversity on the networks suggesting a strong concentration of programming into a few program types. The HHI follows the same pattern as the Dominick Pearce index. The pattern is consistent ­ after the rules
• http://transition.fcc.gov/ownership/roundtable_docs/waldfogel-a.pdf
  • 1 1 2 3 5 Hybrid Zips Total Circulation 7,397 4,665 29 515 2,269 5,674 18,327 Circulation Per Capita 7,397 0.32 0.01 0.12 0.20 0.30 0.58 Circulation Per Household 7,392 0.97 0.02 0.34 0.54 0.79 1.57 Circulated Papers 7,397 2.92 1 1 2 4 7 MSA's Total Circulation 269 129,735 21,092 30,989 50,946 104,769 540,584 Circulation Per Capita 269 0.23 0.15 0.20 0.23 0.26 0.33 Circulation Per Household 269 .59 0.42 0.53 0.59 0.65 0.78 Circulated Papers 269 8.72 2 4 6 10 22 Paper Equivalents1 269 1.68 1.01 1.1 1.35 1.92 3.41 Newspaper Statistics2 (Burrelle's, Editor & Publisher) Newspaper Price 728 0.48 0.25 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 MSA Average Newspaper Price 234 0.49 0.35 0.48 0.50 0.50 0.57 Newspaper Pages
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/antenna/index.htm?job=uls_transaction&page=weekly
  • - 47 CFR Parts 74 and 101, and 3650 - 3700 MHz [100]Applications 131.28 MB 7/15/2012 [101]Licenses 77.5 MB 7/15/2012 Ownership [102]Filings 2.93 MB 7/15/2012 Paging - 47 CFR Part 22 [103]Applications 4.62 MB 7/15/2012 [104]Licenses 4.37 MB 7/15/2012 Ship Radio Service - 47 CFR Part 80 [105]Applications 13.07 MB 7/15/2012 [106]Licenses 27.85 MB 7/15/2012 Spectrum Leasing [107]Form 603-T Applications 0.15 MB 7/15/2012 [108]Form 608 Applications 2.4 MB 7/15/2012 Unlicensed Wireless Microphone Registration [109]Form 612 Applications 0.01 MB 7/15/2012 Last reviewed/updated on 07/17/2012. [110]FCC Home [111]Search [112]RSS [113]Updates [114]E-Filing [115]Initiatives [116]Consumers [117]Find People [118]Licensing, Technical Support and Website Issues - [119]Forgot Your Password? - [120]Submit eSupport request Phone: 1-877-480-3201 TTY: 1-717-338-2824 Federal Communications Commission 445 12th Street SW Washington, DC 20554
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/16/releases/da971934.pdf http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/16/releases/da971934.txt http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/16/releases/da971934.wp
  • from the previous round. The activity index is then 3 used to calculate a percentage increment by multiplying a minimum percentage increment by one plus the activity index with that result being subject to a maximum percentage increment. The Commission will initially set the weighting factor at 0.5, the minimum percentage increment at 0.05, and the maximum percentage increment at 0.15. The mathematical formulas can be found in the Equations section, following. B. Equations A = (C * B) + ( (1-C) * A) i i i-1 I = smaller of ( (1 + A) * N) and M i i where, A = activity index for the current round (round i) i C = activity weight factor B = number
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/17/releases/lmdsbp_b.pdf
  • from the previous round. The activity index is then used to calculate a percentage increment by multiplying a minimum percentage increment by one plus the activity index with that result being subject to a maximum percentage increment. The 107 Commission will initially set the weighting factor at 0.5, the minimum percentage increment at 0.05, and the maximum percentage increment at 0.15. The mathematical formulas follow. (a) Equations A = (C * B) + ( (1-C) * A) i i i-1 I = smaller of ( (1 + A) * N) and M i i where, A = activity index for the current round (round i) i C = activity weight factor B = number of bids in the current round (round
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/18/releases/220_b.pdf
  • index from the previous round. The activity index is then used to calculate a percentage increment by multiplying a minimum percentage increment by one plus the activity index with that result being subject to a maximum percentage increment. The Commission will initially set the weighting factor at 0.5, the minimum percentage increment at 0.05, and the maximum percentage increment at 0.15. Equations A = (C * B) + ( (1-C) * A) i i i-1 I = smaller of ( (1 + A) * N) and M i i where, A = activity index for the current round (round i) i C = activity weight factor B = number of bids in the current round (round i) i A = activity
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/18/releases/da980048.pdf http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/18/releases/da980048.txt http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/18/releases/da980048.wp
  • index from the previous round. The activity index is then used to calculate a percentage increment by multiplying a minimum percentage increment by one plus the activity index with that result being subject to a maximum percentage increment. The Commission will initially set the weighting factor at 0.5, the minimum percentage increment at 0.05, and the maximum percentage increment at 0.15. Equations A = (C * B) + ( (1-C) * A) i i i-1 I = smaller of ( (1 + A) * N) and M i i where, A = activity index for the current round (round i) i C = activity weight factor 6 B = number of bids in the current round (round i) i A =
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/18/releases/da981010.pdf http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/18/releases/da981010.txt http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/18/releases/da981010.wp
  • index from the previous round. The activity index is then used to calculate a percentage increment by multiplying a minimum percentage increment by one plus the activity index with that result being subject to a maximum percentage increment. The Commission will initially set the weighting factor at 0.5, the minimum percentage increment at 0.05, and the maximum percentage increment at 0.15. 30 Equations A = (C * B) + ( (1-C) * A) i i i-1 I = smaller of ( (1 + A) * N) and M i i where, A = activity index for the current round (round i) i C = activity weight factor B = number of bids in the current round (round i) i A =
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/21/releases/da981879.pdf http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/21/releases/da981879.txt http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/21/releases/da981879.wp
  • by multiplying a minimum percentage increment by one plus the activity index with that result being subject to a maximum percentage increment. Comtrak urges the Commission to follow its precedent in the 220 MHz, LMDS and 800 MHz auctions by adopting a minimum percentage increment of 0.05 and a maximum Id. at 7-8. 57 Id. 58 31 percentage increment of 0.15. Comtrak believes these figures will ensure the auction is 57 conducted at a reasonable pace while generating a fair price for spectrum. Comtrak believes the difference, although small, may be significant enough to alter auction patterns. 58 The actual precedent set in the 220 MHz Service auction was a shift from the 0.05 to 0.15 increment range to the 0.10
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/22/charts/22press5.pdf
  • 8bit FCC C, D, E, and F Block Broadband Auction * Final * 78 Market Data for Round: LicenseMarket Name Population BUsBidsHigh BidderRndGross High Bid Net High Bid CreditBid IncPrev High BidderRound Prev Gross Prev Net Credit Min Acceptable Bid MHz CWB060E Buffalo, NY 1,231,795 739,077 -MCG PCS, Inc. 23 $1,280,000 $1,280,000 0.25 1 OPCS Three, LLC 20 $1,146,000 $1,146,000 0.15 $1,408,000 10 CWB155E Ft Wayne, IN 646,736 388,042 -Century Person 29 $881,000 $881,000 - 1 BRK Wireless Compa 25 $793,000 $793,000 0.25 $969,000 10 CWB166E Grand Forks, ND 213,932 128,360 -Comet Wireles 45 $43,000 $43,000 0.25 1 Leap Wireless Internat 44 $37,000 $37,000 0.25 $47,000 10 CWB199E Huron, SD 53,189 31,914 -Comet Wireles 5 $6,144 $6,144 0.25 1 FCC -
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/24/charts/24press2.pdf
  • 4 $2,524,300.00 $1,917,260.00 16 0.83 3 0.29 62 4 4 $2,525,300.00 $1,917,035.00 16 0.83 3 0.29 63 4 4 $2,526,500.00 $1,918,970.00 16 0.83 3 0.29 64 4 4 $2,527,200.00 $1,918,515.00 16 0.83 3 0.29 65 4 4 $2,529,300.00 $1,921,035.00 16 0.83 3 0.29 66 4 4 $2,530,700.00 $1,920,790.00 16 0.83 3 0.29 67 2 2 $2,531,100.00 $1,921,050.00 16 0.83 3 0.15 68 3 3 $2,533,900.00 $1,922,870.00 16 0.83 3 0.22 69 1 1 $2,536,900.00 $1,924,820.00 16 0.83 3 0.07 70 1 1 $2,537,100.00 $1,924,950.00 16 0.83 3 0.07 71 0 0 $2,537,100.00 $1,924,950.00 16 0.83 3 0.00 Wednesday, June 30, 1999 Page 1 of 1
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/26/releases/pagebp_g.pdf
  • radial and addition radials above and below the below the inter-station radial at 2.5º intervals. (f) UHF interfering contour. For base and fixed stations transmitting on the UHF channels, the radial distance from the transmitting antenna to the interfering contour along each cardinal radial is calculated as follows: (1) If the radial antenna HAAT is less than 150 meters: d=9.471xh0.23 xp0.15 where: d is the radial distance in kilometers 54 h is the radial antenna HAAT in meters p is the radial ERP in Watts Whenever the actual HAAT is less than 30 meters (98 feet), 30 must be used as the value for h in the above formula. (2) If the radial antenna HAAT is 150 meters or more: d=6.336xh0.31
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/35/charts/35press5.pdf
  • $4,832,000 - $5,426,000 10 0 686,688 X C N/A CWB010C5Allentown, PA -Cellco Partnership, d/b 43 $7,811,000 $7,811,000 - Leap Wireless Internati 41 $7,347,000 $5,510,250 0.25 $8,202,000 10 0 686,688 O N/A CWB012C1Altoona, PA -Salmon PCS, LLC 69 $925,000 $925,000 0.25 NTCH, Inc. 68 $860,000 $860,000 0.25 $971,000 15 0 222,625 X C N/A CWB020C3Asheville, NC -Lafayette Communicati 56 $5,936,000 $5,936,000 0.15 Leap Wireless Internati 55 $5,447,000 $5,447,000 0.25 $6,233,000 10 0 510,055 X C N/A CWB020C4Asheville, NC -Cook Inlet/VS GSM V 53 $6,457,000 $6,457,000 - Lafayette Communicati 52 $5,979,000 $5,979,000 0.15 $6,780,000 10 0 510,055 X C N/A CWB020C5Asheville, NC -Leap Wireless Internati 57 $7,825,000 $5,868,750 0.25 Cellco Partnership, d/b 36 $7,452,000 $7,452,000 - $8,216,000 10 0 510,055 X O N/A
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/41/charts/41press5.pdf
  • 3 $26,000 $19,500 0.25 $35,000 0.05 0 26,410,597 CNMTA00128New York -Allegheny Communicat 30 $36,000 $27,000 0.25 Scott C. MacIntyre 29 $30,000 $22,500 0.25 $41,000 0.05 0 26,410,597 CNMTA00129New York -Space Data Spectrum 20 $53,000 $39,750 0.25 FCC - - - - $61,000 0.1 0 26,410,597 CNMTA00130New York -Space Data Spectrum 3 $79,000 $59,250 0.25 FCC - - - - $91,000 0.15 0 26,410,597 CNMTA00131New York -Space Data Spectrum 7 $106,000 $79,500 0.25 FCC - - - - $122,000 0.2 0 26,410,597 CNMTA00132New York -Allegheny Communicat 7 $59,000 $44,250 0.25 FCC - - - - $68,000 0.11 0 26,410,597 CNMTA00226Los Angeles-San Die -Space Data Spectrum 43 $60,000 $45,000 0.25 Paging Systems, Inc. 41 $50,000 $50,000 - $69,000 0.05 0 19,145,232 CNMTA00227Los Angeles-San
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/44/charts/44press5.pdf
  • - - $221,000 Capitol Broad 12 0 699,066 WZ-CMA072-C West Palm 14 $516,000 $335,400 0.35 Aloha Partner 8 $468,000 $304,200 0.35 - $542,000 Harbor Wirele 12 0 863,518 WZ-CMA073-C Oxnard-Simi 45 $425,000 $276,250 0.35 David M. Gate 42 $401,000 $260,650 0.35 - $446,000 Aloha Partner 12 0 669,016 WZ-CMA074-C Fresno, CA 9 $289,000 $187,850 0.35 The Ponderos 7 $254,000 $215,900 0.15 - $303,000 Aloha Partner 12 0 667,490 WZ-CMA075-C Austin, TX 34 $1,378,000 $1,378,000 - LIN Television 33 $1,276,000 $1,276,000 - - $1,447,000 LIN Televisio 12 0 781,572 WZ-CMA076-C New Bedfor 32 $184,000 $184,000 - Harbor Wirele 31 $160,000 $104,000 0.35 - $193,000 LIN Televisio 12 0 506,325 WZ-CMA077-C Tucson, AZ 13 $248,000 $161,200 0.35 McBride Spect 11 $220,000 $143,000 0.35
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/49/charts/49press5.pdf
  • High Bddr Rnd Prev Gross Prev Net Bid CreditBids Min Acceptable Bid Inc. MHz Population WZ-CMA025-C Buffalo, NY 18 $639,000 $415,350 0.35 Lynch 3G Co 11 $608,000 $608,000 - - $703,000 Cavalier Grou 12 0 1,170,111 WZ-CMA034-C Rochester, 22 $862,000 $560,300 0.35 Cavalier Grou 21 $799,000 $519,350 0.35 - $948,000 Aloha Partner 12 0 1,037,831 WZ-CMA044-C Albany-Sche 41 $1,099,000 $934,150 0.15 Aloha Partner 40 $1,004,000 $652,600 0.35 - $1,209,000 Vermont Tele 12 0 844,001 WZ-CMA048-C Toledo, OH- 19 $586,000 $380,900 0.35 Lima Direction 15 $554,000 $415,500 0.25 - $645,000 Aloha Partner 12 0 805,133 WZ-CMA052-C Akron, OH 27 $346,000 $224,900 0.35 Viacel Corpor 26 $315,000 $204,750 0.35 - $381,000 Aloha Partner 12 0 694,960 WZ-CMA053-C Syracuse, N 22 $536,000 $348,400 0.35
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/50/charts/50press5.pdf
  • $375 0.25 - $620 Space Data 0.05 0 224,026 CN-MTA050-27 Guam-North 3 $500 $375 0.25 FCC - - - - - $550 Space Data 0.05 0 224,026 CN-MTA050-29 Guam-North 11 $500 $375 0.25 FCC - - - - - $550 Space Data 0.1 0 224,026 CN-MTA050-30 Guam-North 2 $500 $375 0.25 FCC - - - - - $550 Space Data 0.15 0 224,026 Thursday, October 02, 2003 Page 1 of 2 License Name Market NameHigh Bidder Rnd of H. Bid Gross Net Bid Credit Prev High Bddr Rnd Prev Gross Prev Net Bid CreditBids Min Acceptable Bid Inc. MHz Population CN-MTA050-31 Guam-North 18 $630 $473 0.25 Space Data S 17 $550 $413 0.25 - $720 MILTON GO 0.2 0 224,026 CN-MTA050-32
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/53/charts/53press5.pdf
  • Reno 47 $199,000 $129,350 0.35 BRUCE E. FO 46 $169,000 $109,850 0.35 - $228,000 SOUTH.COM 500 0 DV-DMA115 Augusta 13 $40,000 $26,000 0.35 Edward A. Sh 12 $35,000 $22,750 0.35 - $44,000 MDS Operati 500 0 DV-DMA116 Montgomery 12 $35,000 $22,750 0.35 BRUCE E. FO 5 $32,000 $20,800 0.35 - $39,000 MDS Operati 500 0 DV-DMA117 Peoria-Bloo 42 $69,000 $58,650 0.15 BRUCE E. FO 41 $58,000 $37,700 0.35 - $76,000 Cass Cable T 500 0 DV-DMA118 Fargo-Valley 5 $31,000 $20,150 0.35 FCC - - - - - $34,000 BRUCE E. F 500 0 DV-DMA119 SantaBarbra 29 $44,000 $28,600 0.35 MDS Operatio 4 $40,000 $26,000 0.35 - $48,000 MVD Number 500 0 DV-DMA120 Monterey-Sa 29 $33,000 $21,450 0.35 MDS Operatio 1 $30,000
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/53/releases/fc020116.pdf
  • 0.79 54 -180 -19.2 108 -180 -25 162 -180 -29.7 1 -180 0.96 55 -180 -24.5 109 -180 -23.2 163 -180 -36.8 2 -180 0.95 56 -180 -27.1 110 -180 -23.5 164 -180 -35.6 3 -180 0.81 57 -180 -24.7 111 -180 -26.5 165 -180 -39.9 4 -180 0.45 58 -180 -32.8 112 -180 -23.9 166 -180 -40.5 5 -180 -0.15 59 -180 -31.3 113 -180 -22.3 167 -180 -29.4 6 -180 -0.38 60 -180 -20.5 114 -180 -22.5 168 -180 -24.6 7 -180 -0.66 61 -180 -19.3 115 -180 -22.7 169 -180 -24.3 8 -180 -1.8 62 -180 -19.6 116 -180 -24.2 170 -180 -31.9 9 -180 -2.72 63 -180 -17.4 117 -180 -29.2 171 -180 -32.3 10 -180 -2.93
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/55/charts/55press5.pdf
  • Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Market Data for Round: 76 FCC 900 MHz Specialized Mobile Radio Service #55 **Final** License Name Market NameHigh Bidder Rnd of H. Bid Gross Net Bid Credit Prev High Bddr Rnd Prev Gross Prev Net Bid CreditBids Min Acceptable Bid Inc. MHz Population YD-MTA005-Q Detroit 18 $111,000 $111,000 - Scott C MacInt 17 $94,000 $79,900 0.15 - $122,000 ACI 900, Inc. 0.25 0 10,658,459 YD-MTA007-G Dallas-Fort 17 $137,000 $137,000 - X.W. LLC 16 $118,000 $100,300 0.15 - $151,000 ACI 900, Inc. 0.25 0 11,688,918 YD-MTA009-I Philadelphia 6 $77,000 $77,000 - FleetTalk Part 5 $64,000 $64,000 - - $85,000 ACI 900, Inc. 0.25 0 9,510,948 YD-MTA011-S Atlanta 17 $657,000 $657,000 - Southern Com 14 $584,000 $584,000 -
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/58/charts/58press5.pdf
  • FCC - - - - - $452,000 Peter T. Ake 15 0 191,015Closed CW-BTA149-C3 Fort Collins- 12 $396,000 $396,000 - Edge Mobile, L 4 $377,000 $377,000 - - $416,000 Union Teleph 10 0 251,494Closed CW-BTA149-C4 Fort Collins- 11 $396,000 $396,000 - Union Telepho 1 $377,000 $377,000 - - $416,000 Edge Mobile, 10 0 251,494Closed CW-BTA149-C5 Fort Collins- 1 $377,000 $320,450 0.15 FCC - - - - - $396,000 N.E. Colorad 10 0 251,494Open CW-BTA159-C4 Gainesville, 40 $626,000 $626,000 - Rose M. Villas 39 $582,000 $582,000 - - $657,000 Cook Inlet/VS 10 0 320,199Closed CW-BTA159-C5 Gainesville, 67 $845,000 $633,750 0.25 Peter T. Akem 66 $786,000 $589,500 0.25 - $887,000 Royal Street 10 0 320,199Open CW-BTA162-E Gallup, NM 10 $216,000 $216,000 - FCC
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/66/charts/66press_5.pdf
  • Market NamePW Bidder Round of PWB* PWB* (Gross)PWB* (Net)Bidding Credit Previous PW BidderRound Previous PWB* (Gross)Previous PWB* (Net) Bidding Credit Minimum Acceptable Bid for Round Inc. MHz Population 162 AW-BEA001-B Bangor ME 40 $437,000 $437,000 - Atlantic Wireless, L 39 $402,000 $301,500 0.25 $459,000 SpectrumCo 20 1 526,106 AW-BEA001-C Bangor ME 115 $316,000 $316,000 - Vermont Telephon 114 $288,000 $244,800 0.15 $332,000 T-Mobile Lice 10 1 526,106 AW-BEA002-B Portland ME 52 $3,513,000 $3,513,000 - Barat Wireless, L.P 51 $3,194,000 $2,395,500 0.25 $3,689,000 SpectrumCo 20 1 748,817 AW-BEA002-C Portland ME 85 $2,229,000 $2,229,000 - AWS Wireless Inc. 84 $2,027,000 $2,027,000 - $2,340,000 T-Mobile Lice 10 1 748,817 AW-BEA003-B Boston-Wor 48 $76,849,000$76,849,000 - MetroPCS AWS, L 47 $71,390,000 $71,390,000 - $80,691,000 SpectrumCo 20
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/71/charts/71press_5.pdf
  • 13 $340,000 $340,000 - Pioneer Telephone 12 $294,000 $294,000 - $374,000 SKT, Inc. 10 1 128,235 CW-BTA200-C5 Hutchinson, 15 $340,000 $340,000 - N.E. Colorado Wire 14 $304,000 $304,000 - $375,000 SKT, Inc. 10 1 128,235 CW-BTA218-F Johnstown, 11 $573,000 $573,000 - Buffalo-Lake Erie 8 $415,000 $311,250 0.25 $630,000 Toba Inlet PC 10 1 232,621 CW-BTA220-C5 Joplin, MO- 12 $924,000 $785,400 0.15 Toba Inlet PCS, LL 11 $770,000 $770,000 - $1,017,000 Eastern Kans 10 1 247,343 CW-BTA289-C3 Melbourne-T 12 $420,000 $357,000 0.15 Toba Inlet PCS, LL 11 $354,000 $354,000 - $462,000 Highland Cell 10 1 476,230 CW-BTA330-C3 Olean, NY-B 19 $119,000 $101,150 0.15 FCC 18 - - - $134,000 Highland Cell 10 1 238,984 CW-BTA349-C3 Pittsburg-Pa 8 $94,000 $79,900 0.15 N.E. Colorado
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/conferences/combin2001/papers/combexch.pdf
  • ofthedistributionoverthecriticalvalue. Letusnowcomparehowwelleachpaymentruleprovidesincentivestominimizeagent manipulation.Figure10plotstheexpectedgaininutility(incomparisonwithtruthful bidding),Eui( )-Eui(0),ineachpaymentrule.Theparametersineachrulearecarefully tunedtoensurethattheexpecteddiscounttotheagentineachrule,whentheagentfollows itsoptimalstrategy,isthesame.Inthiscasewesettheparameterstogivetheexpected discountineachruleequalto0.1 .Noticethatthelevelofmanipulation, i,thatmaximizes theagent'sgaininutilityissmallestintheThresholdschemeforthisvalueofsurplus,with Largenotfarbehind. Finally,wecanunderstandtheeffectthatthechoiceofpaymentrulehasonagent's optimalmanipulationlevelsfordifferentlevelsofexpecteddiscount.Itisinterestingto assumethatthereisanaveragesurplusof availabletoallocateasdiscounttoagenti, andcomparetherulesfor [0,1].Thisisassumption[A3]. ReturningagaintotheThresholdrule,weneedtocomputetheparameterC t( ),for surplus ,thatminimizesagentmanipulationbutensuresbudget-balance;i.e.computethe minimalCtsuchthatE i( i(Ct),Ct) .ByAssumption[A4]weallowexantebudget- balance,suchthatthediscountsbalancethesurplusonaverageoverthedistributionof criticalvalues,x.InthecaseofThreshold,thesolutionis: C t( )=max 0, 4 2- 16 C t( )istheThresholdparameterthatminimizesmanipulationandmaintainsbudget- balance.With 1/4,thenC ( )=0andtheruleimplementsVickreydiscounts,while for =0,thenC ( )= /2andtheruleimplementsnodiscounts. 37 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 -0.1 -0.05 0 0.05 0.1 0.15 Agent Manipulation, Expected Utility Gain, EU( ) - EU(0) frac equal reverse large small thresh Figure10:ExpectedGaininUtilityfordifferentbidsb=v- undereachpaymentscheme.The parametersineachrulearecarefullysettomakeeachruleallocatethesameexpecteddiscount, whentheagentfollowsitsoptimalstrategyforthatrule.Inthiscasetheexpecteddiscountis0.1 ineachrule. 0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 Available surplus, Agent Manipulation, *( ) frac equal reverse large small thresh Figure11:Optimalagentmanipulation, i( ),(asaproportionof )undereachpaymentscheme astheamountofavailablesurplusincreasesfrom0to /2per-agent.Theparametersarecarefully selectedateach togivebudget-balanceineachrule. 38 Finally,wehavearelationshipbetweentheexpecteddiscountallocatedtoagentiand thelevelofmanipulationselectedbyagenti,whentheparameterinThresholdiscarefully selectedtogivebudget-balance: i( )=min[C t( ),
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/conferences/combin2001/papers/parkes.pdf
  • 0.8 1 Highest outside bid, x Utility (d)Fractional Figure2:Utilityofbidsb v with f g,v , asthebestoutsidebidxvariesbetween and .C in Threshold,and inFractional. IntheVickreyschemealowerbidreducestheagent'sex- pectedutilitybecauseitdecreasestheprobabilityofsuccess withoutincreasingtheutilityofasuccessfulbid.Incompar- ison,withnodiscounttheagentgainsutilityonallsuccess- fulbidsbytheamountofdeviationfromtruthfulbidding. IntheThresholdschemealowerbidonlyreducestheprice paidforalimitedrangeofoutsidebids(closerthanCtothe bidprice),whileintheFractionalschemealowerbidre- ducesthepricepaidonallsuccessfulbids(butbylessthan intheNoDiscountscheme). Makingourassumptionaboutthedistributionofxaround anagent'svaluevl,wecancomputetheexpectedutilityfor differentlevelsofmanipulationundereachschemeasthe areaunderaparticularcurveinaplotlikeFigure2.7The expected-utilitymaximizingbidcorrespondstothecurve withmaximumarea.InFigure3weplottheexpectedgainin utility(incomparisonwithtruthfulbidding),Eu Eu , forbidb v ineachpaymentrule.Ruleparametersare settogiveBBwithsurplus atoptimalagentstrate- 6Althoughnotplottedhere,thecurvesforEqualaresimilarto theNo-Discountcase(exceptshiftedhigherinutilitybyaconstant amount),andLargeissimilartoThreshold. 7Itisatthisstagethatanequilibriumanalysiswouldneedto useaderivedexpressionforthedistributionofx. 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 -0.1 -0.05 0 0.05 0.1 0.15 Agent Manipulation, Expected Utility Gain, EU( ) - EU(0) frac equal reverse large small thresh Figure3:ExpectedGaininUtilityfordifferentbidsb v undereachpaymentscheme,withruleparameterssettogiveBB withsurplus . gies.Noticethatthelevelofmanipulation, ,thatmaxi- mizestheagent'sgaininutilityissmallestintheThreshold schemeforthisvalueofsurplus. Theresults(below)showthattheLargeandThreshold rulesperformwellinthismodel,andleadtothefollowing intuitiveremarksaboutpaymentrules(seeFigure1): 1.Alargeflatsectionforbidsclosetotheagent'struevalue isuseful,i.e.withadjustedbidpriceindependentofthe agent'sbidprice. 2.Nowhereshouldtheadjustedbidpricebegreaterthanthe agent'sbidprice(forIRwithtruthfulbidding),whichcon- strainsthelinetolietotherightofthe"no-discount"line. 3.Itismoreimportanttoimplementtheflatsectionforval- ues,v,farfromthehighestoutsidebid,x,thanvaluesclose tothehighestoutsidebid(i.e.LargeratherthanSmall), becausemanipulationisalreadymoreriskyfortruevalues closetovthanfarfromx.8 Itisusefultothinkaboutthe"degreeofmanipulation freedom"availabletoanagent,whichinthissimplesingle- bundlemodelisthedifferencebetweenanagent'svaluev andthehighestoutsidebidx.Ingeneral,thisissimplymea- suredbytheVickreydiscounttoanagentthatbidstruth- fully,i.e.theamountbywhichitcouldhavereduceditsbid priceandstillparticipatedinthesametrades.TheLargeand Thresholdschemesareeffectivebecausetheymakemanipu- lationmoredifficultandlessusefulforanagentwithalarge degreeofmanipulationfreedom,whileleavingtheabilityto manipulateofagentswithasmalldegreeofmanipulation freedomunchanged.Thisisagoodincentivestrategybe- causeitattacksthe"lowrisk"manipulationopportunities, butleavesthe"highrisk"opportunities.Agentsareuncer- tainaboutthebidsfromotheragentsandalwaysruntherisk ofbiddingtoolowandforfeitingaprofitabletrade. Results.Table3summarizestheanalyticalresults,giving anagent'soptimalbiddingstrategy, ,asafunctionofthe parameterineachscheme,andtheexpecteddiscountper- 8Notethatintermsofefficiencythepictureismixed.Whilewe canstandmoremanipulationfromagentswithlargevaluescom-
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/conferences/combin2001/papers/sandholm1.pdf
  • = 10) CABOB CPLEX 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5 500 1000 1500 2000 Time (s) Bids Sandholm weighted random (#bids/#items = 10) CABOB CPLEX Figure1:Runtimesontherandomandweightedrandom distributions. right),theperformanceofCABOBandCPLEXisalmost identical.However,theyachievethisverydifferently.With 2,000bids,CPLEX'spresolve+LPsolvestheproblem95% ofthetimewhileCABOBresortstosearch88%ofthetime. Interestingly,onthedecaydistribution(Fig.2left)-which isperhapsthemostrealisticdistributionofthoseof[Sand- holm,1999],andwasreportedtobedifficultfortheearlier winnerdeterminationalgorithms-bothalgorithmssolvethe problemusingLPinalmostallcases.CPLEXgoestosearch 2%ofthetimewhileCABOBresortstosearchonly1%ofthe time.CABOBisfasterthanCPLEX,mainlybecauseCPLEX usespresolvewhileCABOBdoesnot. Ontheuniformdistribution(Fig.2right),bothalgorithms resorttosearch.Thespeedsarecomparable,butCPLEX isfaster.Forthefirst-generationwinnerdeterminational- gorithms[Sandholm,1999;Fujishimaetal.,1999],thein- stanceswithsmallnumbersofitemsperbidweremuch harderthaninstanceswithlongbids.ForbothCABOBand CPLEX,complexityisalmostinvarianttothenumberof itemsperbid,exceptthatcomplexitydropssignificantlyas thebidsincludelessthan5itemseach!ThisisbecauseLP canhandlecaseswithshortbidswell,bothintermsofupper boundingandfindingintegersolutions.(Ifeachbidcontains onlyoneitem,LPalwaysfindsanintegersolution). Thecomponentsdistributiondemonstratesthepowerof CABOB'sdecompositiontechniqueandpruningacrosscom- 0 0.05 0.1 0.15 0.2 0.25 0.3 1000 2000 3000 4000 Time (s) Bids Sandholm decay (#bids/#items = 10, = 0.75) CABOB CPLEX 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Time (s) Items per bid Uniform: 450 bids, 45 items CABOB CPLEX Figure2:Runtimesonthedecayanduniformdistributions. ponents.CABOB'srun-timeincreaseslinearlywiththe numberofcomponentswhileCPLEX'stimeisexponential (Fig.3).Alreadyat5components,CPLEXranoutofvirtual memory.Thesameperformancewouldbeobservedevenif therewerea"glue"bidthatincludeditemsfromeachcompo- nent,sinceCABOBwouldidentifythatbidasanarticulation
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/conferences/combin2001/papers/sandholm3.pdf
  • happeninanauctionsuchasnetworkbandwidthalloca- tion[Leyton-Brownetal.,2000a].Asfarasweknow therehavenotbeenanyperformanceresultspublished forthisdistribution. Ineachofthethreedecay-decaygraphsbelowweseethat reverseauctionswithfreedisposalareroutinelysolvedthe fastest.Reverseauctionswithoutfreedisposalaretheslow- est.Inauctions,freedisposalisonlyslightlyfasterthanno freedisposal.Beforewerantheseexperimentswethought thatauctionsandreverseauctionswithoutfreedisposalwould havethesamecharacteristicsbecausetheirintegerprogram- mingformulationsaresosimilar.Weconjecturethataspe- cializedalgorithmcouldmitigatethedifferencebetweenthe two.Inanycase,alloftheseinstanceswereeasy.Forexam- pleat«½ «¾ ,theLPsolverofCPLEXreturnedin- tegersolutionsupfront(andtherefore,nosearchwasneeded) on74%ofthereverseauctionswithfreedisposal,on52%of theauctionswithfreedisposal,on50%oftheauctionswith- outfreedisposal,andon22%ofthereverseauctionswithout freedisposal. 0 0.02 0.04 0.06 0.08 0.1 0.12 0.14 0.16 0.85 0.9 0.95 Time (s) 2 Multi-Unit Decay-Decay 1000 bids, 100 items ( 1=.4) Auction w/o fd Reverse w/o fd Auction w/ fd Reverse w/ fd 0 0.05 0.1 0.15 0.2 0.25 0.3 0.35 0.85 0.9 0.95 Time (s) 2 Multi-Unit Decay-Decay 1000 bids, 100 items ( 1=.6) Auction w/o fd Reverse w/o fd Auction w/ fd Reverse w/ fd 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 0.85 0.9 0.95 Time (s) 2 Multi-Unit Decay-Decay 1000 bids, 100 items ( 1=.8) Auction w/o fd Reverse w/o fd Auction w/ fd
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/data/papersAndStudies/expsmoth.pdf
  • will be the new high bid plus the greater of either the dollar amount associated with the percentage increment (variable I from i above times the high bid) or the absolute increment (a fixed dollar amount per bidding unit for each license, e.g., $.02 per bidding unit). III. Example License 1 (10,000,000 bidding units) C=0.5, N = 0.05, M = 0.15, Absolute bid increment = $0.02 per bidding unit Round 1 (2 new bids, high bid = $1,000,000) 1. Calculation of percentage increment using exponential smoothing: A = (0.5 * 2) + (0.5 * 0) = 1 1 I = (1 + 1) * 0.05 = 0.1 1 2. Dollar increment using the percentage increment (I from above) 1 0.1 *
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/rss/index.htm?job=ainf&id=62
  • Summary Permits: Auction No. 62 will offer 171 construction permits in the FM Broadcast service for stations throughout the United States and the U.S. Virgin Islands. Qualified Bidders: 214 Rounds Completed: 56 Bidding Days: 12 Results for Round 56 Gross Revenue: $70,122,000.00 - Dollar Change: 3000.00 - % Change: 0.00 Net Revenue: $54,295,300.00 - Dollar Change: 83900.00 - % Change: 0.15 New Bids: 4 Withdrawn Bids: 1 Proactive Waivers: 0 Bidders that Reduced Eligibility: 2 Permits with PWBs*: 164 FCC Held Permits: 7 Eligible Bidders: 97 (of 214 qualified bidders) * PWBs = Provisionally Winning Bidders http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/default.htm?job=auction_summary&id=62M on, 30 Jan 2006 03:55:07 EST Summary Permits: Auction No. 62 will offer 171 construction permits in the FM Broadcast service for stations throughout
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/rss/index.htm?job=ainf&id=65
  • 2006 18:45:01 GMT Summary Licenses: Auction No. 65 will offer nationwide commercial licenses in the 800 MHz band in the three alternative band configurations. Licenses in only one of these mutually incompatible band configurations will be awarded. Qualified Bidders: 9 Rounds Completed: 46 Bidding Days: 7 Results for Round 46 Gross Revenue: $32,360,000.00 - Dollar Change: 50000.00 - % Change: 0.15 Net Revenue: $32,360,000.00 - Dollar Change: 297750.00 - % Change: 0.93 New Bids: 3 Withdrawn Bids: 0 Proactive Waivers: 0 Bidders that Reduced Eligibility: 0 Licenses with PWBs*: 2 FCC Held Licenses: 0 Eligible Bidders: 4 (of 9 qualified bidders) * PWBs = Provisionally Winning Bidders http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/default.htm?job=auction_summary&id=65M on, 22 May 2006 19:25:01 GMT Summary Licenses: Auction No. 65 will offer
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/rss/index.htm?job=ainf&id=69
  • * PWBs = Provisionally Winning Bidders http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/default.htm?job=auction_summary&id=69F ri, 02 Mar 2007 14:15:05 GMT Summary Licenses: Auction 69 will offer 64 1.4 GHz bands licenses: 12 Economic Area Grouping ("EAG") licenses, and 52 Major Economic Area ("MEA") licenses. Qualified Bidders: 9 Rounds Completed: 174 Bidding Days: 17 Results for Round 174 Gross Revenue: $119,892,900.00 - Dollar Change: $179,000.00 - % Change: 0.15 Net Revenue: $119,892,900.00 - Dollar Change: $346,500.00 - % Change: 0.29 New Bids: 1 Withdrawn Bids: 0 Proactive Waivers: 0 Bidders that Reduced Eligibility: 0 Licenses with PWBs*: 64 FCC Held Licenses: 0 Eligible Bidders: 3 (of 9 qualified bidders) * PWBs = Provisionally Winning Bidders http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/default.htm?job=auction_summary&id=69F ri, 02 Mar 2007 14:40:10 GMT Summary Licenses: Auction 69 will offer 64
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/rss/index.htm?job=ainf&id=91
  • 67 (of 117 qualified bidders) * PWBs = Provisionally Winning Bidders http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/default.htm?job=auction_summary&id=91F ri, 06 May 2011 15:50:02 GMT Summary Permits: 144 construction permits for FM Broadcast Qualified Bidders: 117 Rounds Completed: 37 Bidding Days: 8 Results for Round 37 Gross Revenue: $10,495,500.00 - Dollar Change: $3,800.00 - % Change: 0.04 Net Revenue: $8,514,400.00 - Dollar Change: $12,450.00 - % Change: 0.15 New Bids: 4 Withdrawn Bids: 0 Proactive Waivers: 0 Bidders that Reduced Eligibility: 0 Permits with PWBs*: 108 FCC Held Permits: 36 Eligible Bidders: 67 (of 117 qualified bidders) * PWBs = Provisionally Winning Bidders http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/default.htm?job=auction_summary&id=91F ri, 06 May 2011 17:05:01 GMT Summary Permits: 144 construction permits for FM Broadcast Qualified Bidders: 117 Rounds Completed: 38 Bidding Days: 8 Results
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/uls/index.htm?job=transaction&page=weekly
  • - 47 CFR Parts 74 and 101, and 3650 - 3700 MHz [123]Applications 131.28 MB 7/15/2012 [124]Licenses 77.5 MB 7/15/2012 Ownership [125]Filings 2.93 MB 7/15/2012 Paging - 47 CFR Part 22 [126]Applications 4.62 MB 7/15/2012 [127]Licenses 4.37 MB 7/15/2012 Ship Radio Service - 47 CFR Part 80 [128]Applications 13.07 MB 7/15/2012 [129]Licenses 27.85 MB 7/15/2012 Spectrum Leasing [130]Form 603-T Applications 0.15 MB 7/15/2012 [131]Form 608 Applications 2.4 MB 7/15/2012 Unlicensed Wireless Microphone Registration [132]Form 612 Applications 0.01 MB 7/15/2012 Last reviewed/updated on 07/17/2012. [133]FCC Home [134]Search [135]RSS [136]Updates [137]E-Filing [138]Initiatives [139]Consumers [140]Find People [141]Licensing, Technical Support and Website Issues - [142]Forgot Your Password? - [143]Submit eSupport request Phone: 1-877-480-3201 TTY: 1-717-338-2824 Federal Communications Commission 445 12th Street SW Washington, DC 20554
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/uls/index.htm?job=transaction&type=weekly
  • - 47 CFR Parts 74 and 101, and 3650 - 3700 MHz [125]Applications 131.28 MB 7/15/2012 [126]Licenses 77.5 MB 7/15/2012 Ownership [127]Filings 2.93 MB 7/15/2012 Paging - 47 CFR Part 22 [128]Applications 4.62 MB 7/15/2012 [129]Licenses 4.37 MB 7/15/2012 Ship Radio Service - 47 CFR Part 80 [130]Applications 13.07 MB 7/15/2012 [131]Licenses 27.85 MB 7/15/2012 Spectrum Leasing [132]Form 603-T Applications 0.15 MB 7/15/2012 [133]Form 608 Applications 2.4 MB 7/15/2012 Unlicensed Wireless Microphone Registration [134]Form 612 Applications 0.01 MB 7/15/2012 Last reviewed/updated on 07/17/2012. [135]FCC Home [136]Search [137]RSS [138]Updates [139]E-Filing [140]Initiatives [141]Consumers [142]Find People [143]Licensing, Technical Support and Website Issues - [144]Forgot Your Password? - [145]Submit eSupport request Phone: 1-877-480-3201 TTY: 1-717-338-2824 Federal Communications Commission 445 12th Street SW Washington, DC 20554
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/uls/weeklypn.htm?job=transaction&page=weekly
  • - 47 CFR Parts 74 and 101, and 3650 - 3700 MHz [123]Applications 131.28 MB 7/15/2012 [124]Licenses 77.5 MB 7/15/2012 Ownership [125]Filings 2.93 MB 7/15/2012 Paging - 47 CFR Part 22 [126]Applications 4.62 MB 7/15/2012 [127]Licenses 4.37 MB 7/15/2012 Ship Radio Service - 47 CFR Part 80 [128]Applications 13.07 MB 7/15/2012 [129]Licenses 27.85 MB 7/15/2012 Spectrum Leasing [130]Form 603-T Applications 0.15 MB 7/15/2012 [131]Form 608 Applications 2.4 MB 7/15/2012 Unlicensed Wireless Microphone Registration [132]Form 612 Applications 0.01 MB 7/15/2012 Last reviewed/updated on 07/17/2012. [133]FCC Home [134]Search [135]RSS [136]Updates [137]E-Filing [138]Initiatives [139]Consumers [140]Find People [141]Licensing, Technical Support and Website Issues - [142]Forgot Your Password? - [143]Submit eSupport request Phone: 1-877-480-3201 TTY: 1-717-338-2824 Federal Communications Commission 445 12th Street SW Washington, DC 20554
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/News_Releases/1996/nrcc6052.html
  • methodology within the statutory time frame for arbitrating interconnection disputes, the Commission has established default ceilings and ranges for the states to apply, on an interim basis, to interconnection arrangements. The Commission establishes a default range of 0.2- 0.4 cents per minute for switching, plus access charges as discussed below. For tandem switching, the Commission establishes a default ceiling of 0.15 cents per minute. The Order also will establish default ceilings for the other unbundled network elements. These default provisions might provide an administratively simpler approach for state establishment of prices, for a limited interim period, and states, in the exercise of their discretion, select the specific price within that range, or subject to that ceiling. Access Charges for Unbundled Switching
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1996/fcc96325.pdf
  • a cost study and apply an economic costing methodology within the statutory time frame for arbitrating interconnection disputes, the Commission establishes default ceilings and ranges for the states to apply, on an interim basis, to interconnection arrangements. The Commission establishes a default range of 0.2-0.4 cents per minute for switching. For tandem switching, the Commission establishes a default ceiling of 0.15 cents per minute. The Order also establishes default ceilings for the other unbundled network elements. 7. Access Charges for Unbundled Switching 30. Nothing in this Report and Order alters the collection of access charges paid by an interexchange carrier under Part 69 of the Commission's rules, when the incumbent LEC provides exchange access service to an interexchange carrier, either directly
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/fcc01130.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/fcc01130.txt
  • of 0.10 percent. In the same month, the trouble report rate for central office network troubles (MR 2-03) for competitors providing UNE-P services was 0.52 percent, as compared to 0.09 percent for Verizon's retail customers, a difference of 0.43 percent. In November 2000, the trouble report rate for central office network troubles (MR 2-03) for competitors providing UNE-P services was 0.15 percent, as compared to 0.08 percent for Verizon's retail customers, a difference of 0.07 percent. In December 2000, the network trouble report rate (MR 2-01) for competitors providing resale special services was 0.35 percent, as compared to 0.23 percent for Verizon's retail customers, a difference of 0.12 percent. In the same month, the trouble report rate for central office network
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ias0610_tables.doc
  • 15 Residential Fixed Connections (Approximating the National Broadband Availability Target) and Households by State as of June 30, 2010 (Connections with advertised speeds at least 3 mbps down and 768 up and households, in thousands) State Connections Households Subscribership Ratio Alabama 337 1,867 0.18 Alaska * 252 * American Samoa 0 9 0.00 Arizona 927 2,464 0.38 Arkansas 177 1,144 0.15 California 4,773 12,634 0.38 Colorado 919 1,978 0.46 Connecticut 628 1,358 0.46 Delaware 207 343 0.60 District of Columbia 131 270 0.48 Florida 2,592 7,344 0.35 Georgia 989 3,697 0.27 Guam * 39 * Hawaii * 436 * Idaho 72 575 0.12 Illinois 1,499 4,803 0.31 Indiana 713 2,493 0.29 Iowa 174 1,197 0.15 Kansas 243 1,101 0.22 Kentucky 471
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ias1209_tables.doc
  • 0.43 North Carolina 308 3,737 0.08 North Dakota 75 262 0.29 Northern Mariana Isl * 14 * Ohio 543 4,540 0.12 Oklahoma 279 1,455 0.19 Oregon 622 1,522 0.41 Pennsylvania 2,140 4,927 0.43 Puerto Rico * 1,262 * Rhode Island * 410 * South Carolina 300 1,783 0.17 South Dakota 95 317 0.30 Tennessee 650 2,511 0.26 Texas 1,386 8,977 0.15 Utah 311 894 0.35 Vermont 110 248 0.44 Virgin Islands 0 41 0.00 Virginia 1,519 3,052 0.50 Washington 1,173 2,615 0.45 West Virginia 222 747 0.30 Wisconsin 453 2,220 0.20 Wyoming 74 219 0.34 Total 36,840 117,671 0.31 # = Rounds to Zero; * = Data withheld to maintain firm confidentiality. Note: Figures may not sum to totals due to
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ias1210_tables.doc
  • 1,867 0.21 Alaska * 252 * American Samoa 0 9 0.00 Arizona 988 2,464 0.40 Arkansas 202 1,144 0.18 California 5,137 12,634 0.41 Colorado 988 1,978 0.50 Connecticut 658 1,358 0.48 Delaware 210 343 0.61 District of Columbia 137 270 0.51 Florida 2,883 7,344 0.39 Georgia 1,104 3,697 0.30 Guam * 39 * Hawaii * 436 * Idaho 85 575 0.15 Illinois 1,588 4,803 0.33 Indiana 760 2,493 0.30 Iowa 194 1,197 0.16 Kansas 251 1,101 0.23 Kentucky 511 1,718 0.30 Louisiana 466 1,694 0.28 Maine 104 539 0.19 Maryland 1,304 2,158 0.60 Massachusetts 1,640 2,568 0.64 Michigan 1,369 3,808 0.36 Minnesota 792 2,046 0.39 Mississippi 124 1,098 0.11 Missouri 479 2,374 0.20 Montana 118 394 0.30 Nebraska 230 709 0.32
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/lcom0800.pdf
  • 0.34 Georgia 13 2,538,983 3.2 7,788,240 0.33 Hawaii 8 288,425 0.4 1,185,497 0.24 Idaho 4 271,436 0.3 1,251,700 0.22 Illinois 10 3,922,482 4.9 12,128,370 0.32 Indiana 10 1,318,975 1.7 5,942,901 0.22 Iowa 9 774,773 1.0 2,869,413 0.27 Kansas 11 669,472 0.8 2,654,052 0.25 Kentucky 12 911,700 1.1 3,960,825 0.23 Louisiana 9 1,227,106 1.5 4,372,035 0.28 Maine 4 187,003 0.2 1,253,040 0.15 Maryland 7 1,473,494 1.8 5,171,634 0.28 Massachusetts 6 1,892,014 2.4 6,175,169 0.31 Michigan 13 3,512,813 4.4 9,863,775 0.36 Minnesota 13 1,550,411 1.9 4,775,508 0.32 Mississippi 6 673,355 0.8 2,768,619 0.24 Missouri 10 1,855,452 2.3 5,468,338 0.34 Montana * * * 882,779 * Nebraska 4 576,296 0.7 1,666,028 0.35 Nevada 7 750,335 0.9 1,809,253 0.41 New Hampshire 6 280,508 0.4 1,201,134
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ldrpt101.pdf
  • 1984 0.32 0.52 1950 0.19 1.33 1985 0.31 0.48 1951 0.20 1.29 1986 0.28 0.43 1952 0.20 1.27 1987 0.25 0.36 1953 0.21 1.30 1988 0.23 0.33 1954 0.22 1.38 1989 0.22 0.29 1955 0.23 1.43 1990 0.20 0.26 1956 0.23 1.43 1991 0.20 0.24 1957 0.24 1.41 1992 0.19 0.23 $1.04 $0.15 1958 0.24 1.38 1993 0.19 0.22 1.03 0.15 1959 0.24 1.38 1994 0.18 0.20 0.96 0.14 1960 0.24 1.36 1995 0.17 0.19 0.92 0.13 1961 0.25 1.39 1996 0.16 0.17 0.78 0.12 1962 0.25 1.40 1997 0.15 0.15 0.71 0.11 1963 0.25 1.35 1998 0.14 0.15 0.68 0.11 1964 0.25 1.34 1999 0.14 0.14 0.56 0.11 24 Source: Estimates for 1930 through 1981 are based on information in
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ldrpt103.pdf
  • 1984 0.32 0.55 1945 0.21 2.09 1985 0.31 0.51 1946 0.20 1.79 1986 0.28 0.45 1947 0.19 1.52 1987 0.25 0.38 1948 0.19 1.37 1988 0.23 0.35 1949 0.19 1.40 1989 0.22 0.31 1950 0.19 1.42 1990 0.20 0.27 1951 0.20 1.37 1991 0.20 0.26 1952 0.20 1.35 1992 0.19 0.24 $1.01 $0.15 1953 0.21 1.38 1993 0.19 0.24 1.02 0.15 1954 0.22 1.47 1994 0.18 0.21 0.93 0.14 1955 0.23 1.52 1995 0.17 0.20 0.91 0.12 1956 0.23 1.52 1996 0.16 0.18 0.76 0.12 1957 0.24 1.50 1997 0.15 0.16 0.69 0.11 1958 0.24 1.46 1998 0.14 0.16 0.58 0.11 1959 0.24 1.47 1999 0.14 0.15 0.54 0.11 1960 0.24 1.44 2000 0.12 0.12 0.52 0.09 1961 0.25 1.47 2001
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref02.pdf
  • 16.23 11.18 0.06 32.43 2.99 Colorado Boulder Qwest 23.77 18.04 0.12 36.09 4.75 Colorado Colorado SpringsQwest 22.47 16.99 0.13 36.09 4.75 Colorado Denver Qwest 23.58 17.99 0.14 36.09 4.75 Connecticut Ansonia SNET 21.64 16.61 0.18 55.00 3.00 Connecticut Norwalk SNET 20.55 16.61 0.18 55.00 3.00 District of Columbia Washington Verizon 20.70 13.68 0.05 28.00 3.45 Florida Miami BellSouth 18.44 18.43 0.15 40.00 4.75 Florida Tampa Verizon 20.58 16.19 0.10 55.00 3.95 Florida West Palm BeachBellSouth 17.62 17.28 0.10 40.00 4.75 Georgia Albany BellSouth 23.69 17.03 0.12 42.50 4.75 Georgia Atlanta BellSouth 26.65 18.53 0.12 42.50 4.75 Hawaii Honolulu Verizon 24.84 50.61 3.95 Illinois Chicago SBC 21.61 10.92 0.05 53.55 3.95 Illinois Decatur SBC 21.05 17.84 0.06 55.00 3.95 Illinois Rock Island
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref03.pdf
  • 16.58 11.24 0.06 34.09 2.99 Colorado Boulder Qwest 24.33 18.35 0.11 38.43 4.75 Colorado Colorado SpringsQwest 23.51 17.74 0.11 37.17 4.75 Colorado Denver Qwest 24.25 18.29 0.11 38.33 4.75 Connecticut Ansonia SNET 21.28 15.40 0.18 58.30 3.00 Connecticut Norwalk SNET 20.18 15.40 0.18 58.30 3.00 District of Columbia Washington Verizon 21.08 13.40 0.05 21.00 3.45 Florida Miami BellSouth 20.24 18.82 0.15 43.92 4.75 Florida Tampa Verizon 22.45 16.51 0.10 59.13 3.95 Florida West Palm BeachBellSouth 19.41 16.68 0.10 44.12 4.75 Georgia Albany BellSouth 25.33 17.82 0.12 42.50 4.75 Georgia Atlanta BellSouth 28.37 19.38 0.12 42.50 4.75 Hawaii Honolulu Verizon 24.56 50.72 3.95 Illinois Chicago SBC 21.82 10.38 0.05 50.67 3.95 Illinois Decatur SBC 21.15 17.16 0.06 50.28 3.95 Illinois Rock Island
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref04.pdf
  • 12.42 0.10 42.35 3.45 Table 1.3 Residential Telephone Rates in the Sample Cities 1 (As of October 15, 2003) Daytime Call Plan State City Monthly Telephone Rate Including Touch-Tone, Cost of a Connection Charges Least-Cost Telephone Surcharges, and Taxes Five-Minute Including Touch-Tone, Inside Wiring Company Flat-Rate Measured/Message Same-Zone Surcharges, and Taxes Maintenance Service Service New Mexico Alamogordo Qwest 24.22 14.42 0.15 30.00 4.75 New York Binghamton Verizon 31.48 18.74 0.09 55.00 2.35 New York Buffalo Verizon 34.29 19.41 0.09 55.00 2.35 New York Massena Verizon 28.75 18.08 0.09 55.00 2.35 New York New York City Verizon 31.40 18.97 0.09 55.00 2.35 New York Ogdensburg Verizon 29.54 18.57 0.09 55.00 2.35 New York Rochester Frontier 20.42 13.21 0.08 33.32 3.95 North Carolina
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref05.pdf
  • 13.22 0.10 42.35 3.45 Table 1.3 Residential Telephone Rates in the Sample Cities 1 (As of October 15, 2004) Daytime Call Plan State City Monthly Telephone Rate Including Touch-Tone, Cost of a Connection Charges Least-Cost Telephone Surcharges, and Taxes Five-Minute Including Touch-Tone, Inside Wiring Company Flat-Rate Measured/Message Same-Zone Surcharges, and Taxes Maintenance Service Service New Mexico Alamogordo Qwest 23.74 15.04 0.15 30.00 4.75 New York Binghamton Verizon 30.44 18.08 0.09 55.00 2.35 New York Buffalo Verizon 34.47 18.51 0.09 55.00 2.35 New York Massena Verizon 28.65 17.97 0.09 55.00 2.35 New York New York City Verizon 31.67 19.11 0.09 55.00 2.35 New York Ogdensburg Verizon 29.42 18.46 0.09 55.00 2.35 New York Rochester Frontier 20.44 13.23 0.08 33.32 3.95 North Carolina
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref97.pdf
  • indices that have been created by linking the AT&T rate change indices (1940 - 1972) to corresponding producer price indices (1972 - present). The following weights were used to combine year-to-year percentage changes in the linked indices and thus create the AT&T-PPI composite telephone service rate index. Local Intrastate Interstate 1940 - 1959 0.75 0.11 0.14 1960 - 1969 0.65 0.15 0.20 1980 - present 0.55 0.19 0.26 15 Figure 10 Figure 10 compares the AT&T-PPI composite index for 1940 to 1994 with the CPI Telephone Service index. Overall, the CPI Telephone Service index increased about 0.3% per year faster than has the composite index. The CPI Telephone Service index does not cover international rates, which have fallen significantly since 1940.
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref98.pdf
  • Rates Survey as of October 15, 1997. Tables 1.4 and 1.5 provide historical rates for each of the sample cities. Table 1.1 Residential Rates for Local Service in Urban Areas (as of October 15, 1997) Average Rate Median Rate Monthly Charge for Flat-rate Service $13.46 $13.25 Federal and State Subscriber Line Charges 3.54 3.50 Additional Monthly Charge for Touch-tone Service 0.15 0.00 Taxes and 911 Charges 2.35 2.26 Total Monthly Charge for Flat-rate Service 19.49 18.87 Number of Sample Cities with Flat-rate Service 89 - Monthly Charge for Measured/Message Service $7.01 $6.70 Federal and State Subscriber Line Charges 3.51 3.50 Additional Monthly Charge for Touch-tone Service 0.01 0.00 Taxes and 911 Charges 1.71 1.61 Total Monthly Charge for Measured/Message Service 12.24
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref99.pdf
  • 2.34 4.50 6.69 8.1% 9.0% 8.5% 0.08 1974 0.52 2.48 4.67 7.08 7.2% 8.0% 7.6% 0.08 1975 0.52 2.48 4.67 7.32 6.3% 7.0% 6.6% 0.10 1976 0.70 3.15 4.16 7.81 5.4% 6.0% 5.7% 0.13 1977 0.91 3.25 3.96 8.07 4.5% 5.0% 4.8% 0.13 1978 1.00 3.34 3.96 8.31 3.6% 4.0% 3.8% 0.13 1979 1.00 3.34 3.96 8.40 2.7% 3.0% 2.9% 0.15 1980 1.00 3.34 3.96 8.61 1.8% 2.0% 1.9% 0.15 1981 1.01 3.54 4.17 9.16 1.8% 2.0% 1.9% 0.15 1982 1.13 4.07 4.80 10.18 0.9% 1.0% 1.0% 0.20 1983 1.76 4.09 5.15 11.38 $10.50 2.7% 3.0% 2.9% 0.20 1984 1.76 4.09 5.15 12.10 2.7% 3.0% 2.9% 0.20 1985 1.65 3.87 4.83 13.18 2.7% 3.0% 2.9% 0.22 1986 1.75 3.14 3.79 14.62
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/strev-95.pdf
  • 1 1 0.02 1 SOUTH CAROLINA 78 104 1.32 118 SOUTH DAKOTA 13 16 0.20 18 TENNESSEE 87 99 1.25 112 TEXAS 1,056 1,124 14.19 1,274 UTAH 28 30 0.37 33 VERMONT 5 6 0.08 7 VIRGINIA 233 240 3.02 272 WASHINGTON 204 224 2.82 254 WEST VIRGINIA 26 31 0.39 35 WISCONSIN 100 122 1.55 139 WYOMING 10 12 0.15 13 Total $7,302 $7,922 100 $8,977 -15 Table 9 Intralata Toll Revenue Intralata Toll Revenue Intralata Toll Revenue Adjusted SOCC, 2.13 (millions) (millions) ALABAMA $78 $85 ARIZONA 92 99 ARKANSAS 104 136 CALIFORNIA 1,724 1,751 COLORADO 114 119 CONNECTICUT 267 270 DELAWARE 15 15 DC 0 0 FLORIDA 440 447 GEORGIA 129 152 HAWAII 49 49 IDAHO 67 73 ILLINOIS
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/strev-96.pdf
  • 21,604 0.42 (21,597) (0.42) MICHIGAN 13,137 0.18 29,675 0.41 (16,538) (0.23) MINNESOTA 10,115 0.30 14,203 0.43 (4,089) (0.12) MISSISSIPPI 17,702 1.16 6,477 0.42 11,225 0.74 MISSOURI 29,429 0.77 15,944 0.42 13,485 0.35 MONTANA 23,380 3.99 2,506 0.43 20,873 3.56 NEBRASKA 6,688 0.58 4,828 0.42 1,860 0.16 NEVADA 3,208 0.24 5,589 0.41 (2,381) (0.18) NEW HAMPSHIRE 2,494 0.27 3,917 0.42 (1,423) (0.15) NEW JERSEY 2,048 0.03 30,058 0.42 (28,010) (0.40) NEW MEXICO 19,107 1.85 4,236 0.41 14,870 1.44 NEW YORK 9,633 0.07 60,164 0.41 (50,532) (0.34) NORTH CAROLINA 21,475 0.40 21,681 0.41 (206) (0.00) NORTH DAKOTA 6,458 1.37 1,843 0.39 4,615 0.98 OHIO 4,625 0.06 32,405 0.42 (27,781) (0.36) OKLAHOMA 26,637 1.19 9,485 0.42 17,152 0.76 OREGON 18,151 0.79 9,612 0.42 8,538
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/strev-97.pdf
  • 0.00 3,374 0.40 (3,374) (0.40) IDAHO 19,506 2.39 4,203 0.51 15,303 1.87 ILLINOIS 5,717 0.06 35,882 0.37 (30,165) (0.31) INDIANA 2,923 0.07 15,279 0.37 (12,356) (0.30) IOWA 5,682 0.30 8,032 0.42 (2,350) (0.12) KANSAS 36,263 1.91 8,078 0.42 28,185 1.48 KENTUCKY 14,146 0.57 10,299 0.42 3,847 0.16 LOUISIANA 41,626 1.42 11,191 0.38 30,435 1.04 MAINE 5,142 0.53 3,711 0.38 1,432 0.15 MARYLAND 0 0.00 18,190 0.43 (18,190) (0.43) MASSACHUSETTS 7 0.00 22,936 0.43 (22,930) (0.43) MICHIGAN 13,982 0.19 23,016 0.31 (9,034) (0.12) MINNESOTA 8,924 0.26 14,258 0.41 (5,333) (0.15) MISSISSIPPI 18,339 1.16 6,764 0.43 11,575 0.73 MISSOURI 29,578 0.74 15,514 0.39 14,064 0.35 MONTANA 23,468 3.85 3,074 0.50 20,393 3.34 NEBRASKA 6,281 0.53 5,122 0.43 1,159 0.10 NEVADA 3,253 0.22 7,965
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/strev-99.pdf
  • 0.28 2,386 0.07 Connecticut 163 0.01 7,670 0.26 -7,507 -0.26 Delaware 0 0.00 1,942 0.28 -1,942 -0.28 District of Columbia 0 0.00 2,755 0.25 -2,755 -0.25 Florida 5,321 0.04 32,470 0.24 -27,149 -0.20 Georgia 17,863 0.29 15,496 0.25 2,367 0.04 Hawaii 159 0.02 1,846 0.21 -1,687 -0.19 Idaho 3,459 0.39 2,410 0.27 1,049 0.12 Illinois 6,212 0.06 21,166 0.21 -14,954 -0.15 Indiana 5,134 0.12 8,779 0.20 -3,645 -0.08 Iowa 7,237 0.36 4,658 0.23 2,580 0.13 Kansas 11,452 0.55 4,817 0.23 6,635 0.32 Kentucky 4,899 0.19 5,991 0.23 -1,091 -0.04 Louisiana 16,729 0.54 6,606 0.21 10,124 0.33 Maine 6,009 0.58 2,144 0.21 3,864 0.37 Maryland 91 0.00 10,440 0.23 -10,349 -0.22 Massachusetts 102 0.00 12,854 0.23 -12,751 -0.23 Michigan 9,821 0.13 13,601
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend100.pdf
  • Inc. 127 425.9 0.30 1 Coastal Telephone Company 23 81.0 0.28 2 WorldxChange Communications 85 307.6 0.28 1 UniDial, Inc. 46 180.4 0.25 1 GTE Communications Co. 154 606.7 0.25 1 MCI WorldCom, Inc. 4,795 24,127.7 0.20 1 Cable & Wireless Communications, PLC 181 953.1 0.19 1 Working Assets Long Distance 22 131.3 0.17 1 Vartec Telecom, Inc. 110 723.7 0.15 1 Sprint Communication 1,412 9,910.9 0.14 1 IXC Communications Services, Inc. 52 723.7 0.07 1 Intermedia Communications 21 380.1 0.06 1 AT&T Corp. 2,172 40,551.0 0.05 1 * Revenue Source Codes: 1/ This index is derived from publicly available revenue information. 2/ This carrier submitted confidential revenue data in its Universal Service Fund (USF) Worksheet filed with the National Exchange
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend200.pdf
  • 5,308 2,658 1/(4,289) 7,966 0.52 0.40 0.39 2/ 1995 13,990 7,559 6,432 2,623 1/(4,936) 9,054 0.48 0.35 0.39 2/ 1996 14,079 8,206 5,873 2,560 1/(5,645) 8,434 0.43 0.30 0.30 2/ 1997 15,135 8,016 7,119 2,572 1/(5,444) 9,691 0.35 0.26 0.30 2/ 1998 14,154 6,985 7,169 2,512 1/(4,473) 9,681 0.29 0.21 0.27 2/ 1999 14,398 6,312 8,085 1,751 1/(4,561) 9,836 0.23 0.15 0.25 2/ Source: Industry Analysis Division, Trends in the International Telecommunications Industry; Section 43.61 International Telecommunications Data. 1999 data are preliminary. Note: Data are for traffic between domestic U.S. points and foreign points. 1/Includes net settlement receipts for transiting traffic. 2/Includes transiting traffic. 6 - 4 Table 6.3 International Message Telephone Service for 1999 (Figures Rounded to the Nearest Million)
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend298.pdf
  • Aliant 0.06 0.00 1.52 0.32 3.85 258 426 688 Frontier 1.19 0.26 1.29 0.36 4.93 735 1,659 2,396 SNET 0.34 0.00 1.29 0.28 3.60 3,178 5,095 8,276 Sprint Local 1.29 0.61 1.06 0.22 4.62 8,213 12,767 21,110 Citizens 2.64 1.57 1.85 0.42 9.06 1,077 1,431 2,520 Cincinnati Bell 0.55 0.00 0.85 0.17 2.69 1,111 1,799 2,912 All Price Caps 0.91 0.15 0.92 0.30 3.64 171,209 300,879 474,868 NECA 1.00 1.18 3.57 0.08 9.80 11,751 13,622 13,365 All Carriers 0.91¢ 0.20¢ 0.99¢ 0.30¢ 3.82¢ 182,960 314,501 488,233 SOURCE: ANNUAL FILINGS MADE EFFECTIVE JULY 1, 1998. CCL MINUTES FOR PACIFIC TELESIS ARE FROM 1997 ARMIS 43-01 REPORTS FILED AT THE COMMISSION. * This table shows average rates (weighted by minutes of use) for
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend299.pdf
  • 0.35 0.38 1988 23 25 118.3 0.32 0.34 1989 22 23 124.0 0.29 0.31 1990 20 22 130.7 0.25 0.27 1991 20 21 136.2 0.24 0.25 1992 19 21 140.3 0.22 0.24 1993 19 22 144.5 0.22 0.25 1994 18 24 148.2 0.20 0.26 1995 17 27 152.4 0.18 0.29 1996 16 28 156.9 0.17 0.29 1997 15 29 160.5 0.15 0.29 1998 14 28 163.0 0.14 0.28 * Estimates for 1930 through 1981 are based on information in AT&T Long Lines Statistics, 1930-1963; 1946-1970, and 1960-1981 and appear to represent data for the conterminous U.S. only. Data prior to 1946 may not be comparable. Data for 1982 and 1983 were estimated using BLS price index changes. Data for 1984 through
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend502.pdf
  • 0.21 6.16 07/01/96 06/30/97 0.72 0.89 1.95 0.17 6.04 07/01/97 12/31/97 0.64 0.84 1.63 0.14 5.18 01/01/98 06/30/98 0.68 0.23 1.29 0.21 4.04 07/01/98 12/31/98 0.91 0.20 0.99 0.30 3.82 01/01/99 06/30/99 0.82 0.16 0.98 0.32 3.71 07/01/99 12/31/99 0.37 0.10 0.86 0.28 2.82 01/01/00 06/30/00 0.32 0.10 0.86 0.31 2.85 08/11/00 06/31/014/ 0.23 0.07 0.52 0.26 1.91 07/01/01 12/31/01 0.15 0.07 0.48 0.24 1.71 01/01/02 06/30/02 0.15 0.07 0.47 0.24 1.69 4/ Although the charges took effect on July 1, 2000, some companies made adjustments to the tariffs which did not take effect until August 11, 2000. 1/ This table shows average rates (weighted by minutes of use) for all local exchange carriers (LECs) that file access tariffs subject to
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend504.pdf
  • 0.21 6.16 07/01/96 06/30/97 0.72 0.89 1.95 0.17 6.04 07/01/97 12/31/97 0.64 0.84 1.63 0.14 5.18 01/01/98 06/30/98 0.68 0.23 1.29 0.21 4.04 07/01/98 12/31/98 0.91 0.20 0.99 0.30 3.82 01/01/99 06/30/99 0.82 0.16 0.98 0.32 3.71 07/01/99 12/31/99 0.37 0.10 0.86 0.28 2.82 01/01/00 06/30/00 0.32 0.10 0.86 0.31 2.85 08/11/00 06/31/004 0.23 0.07 0.52 0.26 1.91 07/01/01 12/31/01 0.15 0.07 0.48 0.24 1.71 01/01/02 06/30/02 0.15 0.07 0.47 0.24 1.69 07/01/02 06/30/03 0.02 0.01 0.48 0.22 1.46 07/01/03 06/30/04 0.00 0.00 0.48 0.22 1.44 Source: Access tariff filings. 4 Although the charges took effect on July 1, 2000, some companies made adjustments to the tariffs which did not take effect until August 11, 2000. 1 This table shows average
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend605.pdf
  • 0.21 6.16 07/01/96 06/30/97 0.72 0.89 1.95 0.17 6.04 07/01/97 12/31/97 0.64 0.84 1.63 0.14 5.18 01/01/98 06/30/98 0.68 0.23 1.29 0.21 4.04 07/01/98 12/31/98 0.91 0.20 0.99 0.30 3.82 01/01/99 06/30/99 0.82 0.16 0.98 0.32 3.71 07/01/99 12/31/99 0.37 0.10 0.86 0.28 2.82 01/01/00 06/30/00 0.32 0.10 0.86 0.31 2.85 08/11/00 06/31/004 0.23 0.07 0.52 0.26 1.91 07/01/01 12/31/01 0.15 0.07 0.48 0.24 1.71 01/01/02 06/30/02 0.15 0.07 0.47 0.24 1.69 07/01/02 06/30/03 0.02 0.01 0.48 0.22 1.46 07/01/03 06/30/04 0.00 0.00 0.48 0.22 1.44 07/01/04 06/30/05 0.00 0.00 0.50 0.25 1.53 Source: Access tariff filings. Rates in Effect From To Sensitive per Switched Interstate Charges for Switched Access Service Minute 2 Traffic Sensitive per Switched Minute Non-Traffic Minute 1
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend801.pdf
  • 0.21 6.16 07/01/96 06/30/97 0.72 0.89 1.95 0.17 6.04 07/01/97 12/31/97 0.64 0.84 1.63 0.14 5.18 01/01/98 06/30/98 0.68 0.23 1.29 0.21 4.04 07/01/98 12/31/98 0.91 0.20 0.99 0.30 3.82 01/01/99 06/30/99 0.82 0.16 0.98 0.32 3.71 07/01/99 12/31/99 0.37 0.10 0.86 0.28 2.82 01/01/00 06/30/00 0.32 0.10 0.86 0.31 2.85 08/11/00 06/31/004/ 0.23 0.07 0.52 0.26 1.91 07/01/01 12/31/02 0.15 0.07 0.48 0.24 1.71 Source: Industry Analysis Division, Monitoring Report and access tariff filings. 4/ Although the charges took effect on July 1, 2000, some companies made adjustments to the tariffs which did not take effect until August 11, 2000. 1/ This table shows average rates (weighted by minutes of use) for all local exchange carriers (LECs) that file access
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend803.pdf
  • 0.21 6.16 07/01/96 06/30/97 0.72 0.89 1.95 0.17 6.04 07/01/97 12/31/97 0.64 0.84 1.63 0.14 5.18 01/01/98 06/30/98 0.68 0.23 1.29 0.21 4.04 07/01/98 12/31/98 0.91 0.20 0.99 0.30 3.82 01/01/99 06/30/99 0.82 0.16 0.98 0.32 3.71 07/01/99 12/31/99 0.37 0.10 0.86 0.28 2.82 01/01/00 06/30/00 0.32 0.10 0.86 0.31 2.85 08/11/00 06/31/004 0.23 0.07 0.52 0.26 1.91 07/01/01 12/31/01 0.15 0.07 0.48 0.24 1.71 01/01/02 06/30/02 0.15 0.07 0.47 0.24 1.69 07/01/02 06/30/03 0.02 0.01 0.48 0.22 1.46 Source: Access tariff filings. Rates in Effect From To Sensitive per Switched Interstate Charges for Switched Access Service Minute 2 Traffic Sensitive per Switched Minute Non-Traffic Minute 1 Carrier Common Line per Terminating Access Minute 1 Carrier Common Line per Originating Access
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Intl/itltrd98.pdf
  • $1.20 El Salvador N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A $1.55 $1.55 $1.50 $1.50 $1.50 $1.50 $1.40 $1.30 $1.25 $1.20 $1.20 $1.10 $0.88 $0.88 France 1/ 1.6 SDR 1.6 SDR 1.6 SDR 1.6 SDR 1.6 SDR 1.6 SDR 1.4 SDR 1.4 SDR 1.4 SDR 1.2 SDR 1.2 SDR 1.0 SDR 0.7 SDR 0.7 SDR 0.42 SDR 0.36 SDR 0.24 SDR 0.19 SDR 0.15 SDR Germany 1.6 SDR 1.6 SDR 1.3 SDR 1.2 SDR 1.2 SDR 1.2 SDR 1.2 SDR 1.2 SDR 1.2 SDR 1.2 SDR 1.2 SDR 1.0 SDR 0.8 SDR 0.6 SDR 0.34 SDR 0.26 SDR 0.16 SDR 0.15 SDR 0.15 SDR Greece N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 5.0 GF 5.0 GF 5.0 GF 5.0 GF 5.0 GF 5.0 GF 1.53 SDR
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Intl/itltrd99.pdf
  • El Salvador N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A $1.55 $1.55 $1.50 $1.50 $1.50 $1.50 $1.40 $1.30 $1.25 $1.20 $1.20 $1.10 $0.88 $0.77 $0.62 France 1/ 1.6 SDR 1.6 SDR 1.6 SDR 1.6 SDR 1.6 SDR 1.6 SDR 1.4 SDR 1.4 SDR 1.4 SDR 1.2 SDR 1.2 SDR 1.0 SDR 0.7 SDR 0.7 SDR 0.42 SDR 0.36 SDR 0.24 SDR 0.19 SDR 0.15 SDR 0.15 SDR Germany 1.6 SDR 1.6 SDR 1.3 SDR 1.2 SDR 1.2 SDR 1.2 SDR 1.2 SDR 1.2 SDR 1.2 SDR 1.2 SDR 1.2 SDR 1.0 SDR 0.8 SDR 0.6 SDR 0.34 SDR0.26 SDR0.16 SDR0.15 SDR0.15 SDR0.15 SDR Greece N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 5.0 GF 5.0 GF 5.0 GF 5.0 GF 5.0 GF 5.0 GF 1.53 SDR 1.21
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Intl/itrnd00.pdf
  • 0.39 0.40 1995 15,888.8 14,335.4 7,569.0 6,766.4 7,050.6 2,464.1 0.90 0.48 0.43 0.35 0.40 1996 19,325.1 14,597.8 8,252.3 6,345.5 8,293.2 2,450.9 0.76 0.43 0.33 0.30 0.32 1997 22,753.1 15,661.6 8,031.0 7,630.5 9,170.0 2,458.9 0.69 0.35 0.34 0.27 0.32 1998 24,249.9 14,726.3 7,021.7 7,704.5 10,198.5 2,158.2 0.61 0.29 0.32 0.21 0.29 1999 28,363.3 14,941.5 6,360.8 8,580.7 10,764.6 1,575.9 0.53 0.22 0.30 0.15 0.26 See notes at the end of the tables. Table 3 Selected Traffic Statistics for International Telephone Service 1/ 9/ (Revenues, Payouts, Receipts and Minutes Amounts Shown in Millions) International Annual Telephone 1989 19901991 19921993 19941995 19961997 19981999Growth Service Rates 1993 to 1999 5/ U.S. Minutes US Originated and Received 8,972 9,999 11,163 13,110 15,135 18,174 21,288 21,712 25,016 14.4%
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Intl/itrnd01.pdf
  • 0.39 0.40 1995 15,888.8 14,335.4 7,569.0 6,766.4 7,050.6 2,464.1 0.90 0.48 0.43 0.35 0.40 1996 19,325.1 14,597.8 8,252.3 6,345.5 8,293.2 2,450.9 0.76 0.43 0.33 0.30 0.32 1997 22,753.1 15,661.6 8,031.0 7,630.5 9,170.0 2,458.9 0.69 0.35 0.34 0.27 0.32 1998 24,249.9 14,726.3 7,021.7 7,704.5 10,198.5 2,158.2 0.61 0.29 0.32 0.21 0.29 1999 28,515.4 14,980.3 6,383.1 8,597.3 10,765.0 1,576.0 0.53 0.22 0.30 0.15 0.26 2000 30,134.8 14,908.8 5,536.0 9,372.8 12,888.2 1,447.6 0.49 0.18 0.31 0.11 0.25 2001 33,286.8 11,379.6 4,526.2 6,853.5 13,478.0 1,118.4 0.34 0.14 0.21 0.08 0.17 2002 35,988.3 9,956 3,872.9 6,083.6 13,676.8 738.0 0.28 0.11 0.17 0.05 0.14 See notes at the end of the tables. Table 3 Selected Traffic Statistics for International Telephone Service 1/ (Revenues, Payouts, Receipts and Minutes
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr03-11.pdf
  • NW - Washington WA (11,350) (11,190) (160) 1.41 Sprint - United Tel. Co. of the NW - Washington WA 297 225 72 24.24 Qwest - Washington WA NA NA NA NA Verizon - West Virginia WV 9,906 10,082 (177) (1.79) Verizon - North - Wisconsin WI (4,224) (4,198) (26) 0.62 SBC - Ameritech - Wisconsin Bell WI 67,132 67,232 (100) (0.15) Qwest - Wyoming WY NA NA NA NA 11 - 22 Table 11.11 2002 Taxes (Federal, State, and Other) ($000) Study Area State Subject to Percent Code Separations Intrastate Interstate Interstate All Reporting Local Exchange Companies $10,267,569 $6,300,348 $3,947,603 38.45% Bell Operating Companies 9,413,836 5,744,482 3,650,920 38.78 Other Reporting Local Exchange Companies 853,733 555,866 296,683 34.75 BellSouth - Alabama AL
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr03-2.pdf
  • New Hampshire 0.74 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.75 New Jersey 0.67 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.68 New Mexico 4.72 0.47 0.02 0.03 0.09 5.33 New York 3.95 0.00 0.11 0.00 0.00 4.07 North Carolina 2.11 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.01 2.13 North Dakota 4.44 0.54 0.08 0.02 0.04 5.12 Northern Mariana Islands 1.68 0.00 0.29 0.00 0.00 1.98 Ohio 3.57 0.00 0.15 0.00 0.01 3.72 Oklahoma 3.01 3.12 0.13 0.02 0.04 6.31 Oregon 1.83 0.01 0.04 0.00 0.01 1.88 Pennsylvania 1.13 0.00 0.13 0.00 0.00 1.26 Puerto Rico 4.85 0.00 0.12 0.00 0.00 4.96 Rhode Island 7.67 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.00 7.68 South Carolina 1.01 0.00 0.02 0.00 0.01 1.03 South Dakota 3.87 4.55 0.07 0.86 0.09 9.45 Tennessee 1.52 0.00 0.04
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr03-3.pdf
  • Michigan 0.35 0.00 0.14 0.00 0.03 0.11 0.63 Minnesota 0.68 0.00 0.37 0.11 0.24 0.52 1.93 Mississippi 1.34 6.71 0.35 0.96 0.13 0.24 9.73 Missouri 1.07 0.00 0.25 0.36 0.19 0.17 2.04 Montana 4.31 1.64 1.56 0.10 0.62 1.31 9.54 Nebraska 0.96 0.00 0.35 0.22 0.36 0.93 2.81 Nevada 0.43 0.00 0.06 0.55 0.07 0.43 1.53 New Hampshire 0.10 0.00 0.15 0.34 0.05 0.47 1.10 New Jersey 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.03 0.00 0.01 0.05 New Mexico 1.66 0.00 0.53 0.64 0.19 0.75 3.77 New York 0.08 0.00 0.04 0.13 0.01 0.11 0.37 North Carolina 0.27 0.00 0.20 0.38 0.06 0.09 0.99 North Dakota 2.72 0.00 1.32 0.14 0.92 1.97 7.08 N. Mariana Islands 12.70 0.00 0.00 0.96 0.00 3.38 17.04 Ohio
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr03-7.pdf
  • $20.23 $20.03 $20.42 $20.44 $21.16 $20.81 $21.17 $20.61 $21.09 $21.40 200 Five-minute Business-day Same-zone Calls 16.10 16.10 16.57 17.18 17.61 17.41 17.10 17.04 17.22 17.12 17.47 17.97 17.95 18.01 Subscriber Line Charges 4.89 4.85 4.76 4.68 5.27 5.34 5.52 5.47 5.63 5.55 6.85 6.85 6.33 6.33 Extra for Touch-tone 3.41 3.41 2.69 2.47 2.37 1.72 1.33 1.08 0.54 0.42 0.30 0.15 0.07 0.07 Tax including 911 Charges 5.16 5.16 5.04 5.22 5.25 5.21 5.36 5.51 5.76 5.82 6.04 5.96 6.40 6.56 Total Monthly Charge for Measured/Message Service 50.09 49.97 49.93 50.20 50.73 49.71 49.73 49.54 50.31 49.72 51.83 51.54 51.84 52.38 Number of Sample Cities with Measured/Message Service 77 74 76 76 78 79 79 78 76 78 78 78 76
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr04-1.pdf
  • Texas 10,748,849 7.60 4,780 1,011 5,106 1,065 Utah 1,076,507 0.76 479 101 511 107 Vermont 182,269 0.13 81 17 87 18 Virginia 3,819,951 2.70 1,699 359 1,815 379 Virgin Islands NA NA NA NA NA NA Washington 3,038,828 2.15 1,351 286 1,444 301 West Virginia 625,620 0.44 278 59 297 62 Wisconsin 2,301,155 1.63 1,023 216 1,093 228 Wyoming 209,446 0.15 93 20 99 21 Total 2/ 141,775,850 100.00% $63,102$13,357 $67,402 $14,076 NA - Not Applicable. * Data withheld to maintain firms confidentiality. 1/ Based on FCC Form 502 (Number Resources Utililization/Forecasting, as of December 2002). 2/ Totals in the last four columns include revenues for locations not estimated. Dec 02 1/ 4 5 6 7 1 3 Revenues Total RevenuesRevenues
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr04-11.pdf
  • 100,451 3.47 BellSouth - Florida FL (28,432) (42,576) 177,907 (6.26) Sprint - Florida FL 88,642 67,074 34,834 0.39 ALLTEL Georgia Communications GA 14,439 10,529 5,449 0.38 BellSouth - Georgia GA (325,433) (346,861) 139,263 (0.43) Verizon - Hawaii HI 5,792 4,242 102,273 17.66 Verizon - NW - Idaho ID 3,527 2,915 7,136 2.02 Qwest - Idaho South ID (40,166) (42,110) 6,165 (0.15) Qwest - Idaho North ID 2,404 2,274 442 0.18 Verizon - North - Contel Illinois IL 1,714 1,307 10,138 5.91 Verizon - South - Illinois IL 20,874 15,506 2,216 0.11 Verizon - North - Illinois IL 6,826 4,899 79,265 11.61 SBC - Ameritech - Illinois Bell IL (474,917) (487,519) 209,480 (0.44) Verizon - North - Contel/Indiana IN 3,167 2,374 8,658
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr04-3.pdf
  • Maryland 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.04 0.01 0.07 Massachusetts 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.02 0.03 Michigan 0.31 0.00 0.00 0.14 0.05 0.00 0.11 0.62 Minnesota 0.77 0.02 0.00 0.36 0.50 0.14 0.48 2.27 Mississippi 1.13 0.00 7.17 0.31 0.25 1.04 0.19 10.10 Missouri 0.97 0.00 0.00 0.25 0.39 0.35 0.21 2.16 Montana 4.37 0.00 1.65 1.63 1.28 0.15 1.46 10.54 Nebraska 1.29 0.01 0.00 0.37 0.79 0.41 0.99 3.86 Nevada 0.54 0.01 0.00 0.07 0.16 0.58 0.50 1.85 New Hampshire 0.10 0.00 0.00 0.16 0.14 0.37 0.52 1.29 New Jersey 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.02 New Mexico 1.64 0.01 0.00 0.57 0.41 0.74 0.81 4.17 New York 0.07 0.00 0.00 0.04 0.02 0.11 0.12 0.37
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr04-7.pdf
  • and International International All Interstate Switched Services Switched ServicesSwitched ServicesSwitched Services 1984 $0.32 NA NA NA 1985 0.31 NA NA NA 1986 0.28 NA NA NA 1987 0.25 NA NA NA 1988 0.23 NA NA NA 1989 0.22 NA NA NA 1990 0.20 NA NA NA 1991 0.20 NA NA NA 1992 0.19 $0.19 $1.01 $0.15 1993 0.19 0.19 1.02 0.15 1994 0.18 0.18 0.93 0.14 1995 NA 0.17 0.91 0.12 1996 NA 0.16 0.76 0.12 1997 NA 0.15 0.69 0.11 1998 NA 0.14 0.58 0.11 1999 NA 0.14 0.54 0.11 2000 NA 0.12 0.52 0.09 2001 NA 0.10 0.35 0.08 2002 NA 0.09 0.28 0.07 NA - Not available. Note: Data for some prior years have been revised. Sources: AT&T
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr98-7.pdf
  • Aliant 0.06 0.00 1.52 0.32 3.85 258 426 688 Frontier 1.19 0.26 1.29 0.36 4.93 735 1,659 2,396 SNET 0.34 0.00 1.29 0.28 3.60 3,178 5,095 8,276 Sprint Local 1.29 0.61 1.06 0.22 4.62 8,213 12,767 21,110 Citizens 2.64 1.57 1.85 0.42 9.06 1,077 1,431 2,520 Cincinnati Bell 0.55 0.00 0.85 0.17 2.69 1,111 1,799 2,912 All Price Caps 0.91 0.15 0.92 0.30 3.64 171,209 300,879 474,868 NECA 1.00 1.18 3.57 0.08 9.80 11,751 13,622 13,365 All Carriers 0.91¢ 0.20¢ 0.99¢ 0.30¢ 3.82¢ 182,960 314,501 488,233 SOURCE: ANNUAL FILINGS MADE EFFECTIVE JULY 1, 1998. CCL MINUTES FOR PACIFIC TELESIS ARE FROM 1997 ARMIS 43-01 REPORTS FILED AT THE COMMISSION. * This table shows average rates (weighted by minutes of use) for
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrd99-7.pdf
  • 0.35 0.38 1988 23 25 118.3 0.32 0.34 1989 22 23 124.0 0.29 0.31 1990 20 22 130.7 0.25 0.27 1991 20 21 136.2 0.24 0.25 1992 19 21 140.3 0.22 0.24 1993 19 22 144.5 0.22 0.25 1994 18 24 148.2 0.20 0.26 1995 17 27 152.4 0.18 0.29 1996 16 28 156.9 0.17 0.29 1997 15 29 160.5 0.15 0.29 1998 14 28 163.0 0.14 0.28 * Estimates for 1930 through 1981 are based on information in AT&T Long Lines Statistics, 1930-1963; 1946-1970, and 1960-1981 and appear to represent data for the conterminous U.S. only. Data prior to 1946 may not be comparable. Data for 1982 and 1983 were estimated using BLS price index changes. Data for 1984 through
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrs00-0.pdf
  • since7/30/95. 7 - 25 TABLE 7.13 AVERAGE REVENUE PER MINUTE AT&T All Carriers ** All Interstate All Interstate and International and International International All Interstate Switched Services * Switched Services Switched Services *** Switched Services 1984 $0.32 1985 0.31 1986 0.28 1987 0.25 1988 0.23 1989 0.22 1990 0.20 1991 0.20 1992 0.19 $0.19 $1.04 $0.15 1993 0.19 0.19 1.03 0.15 1994 0.18 0.18 0.96 0.14 1995 N/A 0.17 0.92 0.13 1996 N/A 0.16 0.78 0.12 1997 N/A 0.15 0.71 0.11 1998 N/A 0.14 0.68 0.11 1999 N/A 0.14 0.56*** 0.11 Data for some prior years have been revised. * Source: AT&T. ** Source: Industry Analysis Division, Telecommunications Industry Revenue. *** Preliminary data 7 - 26 TABLE 7.14 INTERSTATE PER-LINE ACCESS
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrs01-0.pdf
  • California 285,450 1.05 48,040 0.18 237,410 0.87 Colorado 2,427 0.07 10,522 0.31 -8,095 -0.24 Connecticut 4,996 0.17 8,297 0.28 -3,301 -0.11 Delaware 53 0.01 2,101 0.30 -2,048 -0.29 District of Columbia 952 0.09 2,981 0.27 -2,028 -0.18 Florida 12,145 0.09 35,126 0.26 -22,981 -0.17 Georgia 6,547 0.10 16,763 0.27 -10,216 -0.16 Guam 185 0.20 156 0.17 29 0.03 Hawaii 1,312 0.15 1,996 0.23 -685 -0.08 Idaho 1,854 0.21 2,607 0.30 -753 -0.09 Illinois 4,750 0.05 22,897 0.23 -18,147 -0.18 Indiana 1,380 0.03 9,497 0.21 -8,117 -0.18 Iowa 770 0.04 5,039 0.25 -4,268 -0.21 Kansas 838 0.04 5,211 0.25 -4,373 -0.21 Kentucky 3,639 0.14 6,481 0.25 -2,842 -0.11 Louisiana 1,092 0.04 7,146 0.23 -6,054 -0.20 Maine 7,331 0.71 2,320 0.22 5,012 0.48
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrs02-0.pdf
  • 2.07 48 84 98 142 Oklahoma 102,456 NA 0.69 16 28 32 47 Oregon 99,326 NA 0.67 15 27 31 46 Pennsylvania 870,618 NA 5.85 135 236 276 402 Puerto Rico * 37,200 0.29 7 12 14 20 Rhode Island * 29,400 0.23 5 9 11 16 South Carolina 89,263 NA 0.60 14 24 28 41 South Dakota * 18,400 0.15 3 6 7 10 Tennessee 222,917 NA 1.50 34 61 71 103 Texas 1,764,676 NA 11.87 273 479 559 815 Utah 129,384 NA 0.87 20 35 41 60 Vermont * 15,400 0.12 3 5 6 8 Virgin Islands NA NA NA NA NA NA NA Virginia 336,826 NA 2.26 52 91 107 156 Washington 240,514 NA 1.62 37 65 76
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/SOCC/00socc.pdf
  • Corporation Corp. Corporation Inc. Company Revenues $7,067 1/ $65,981 $26,151 $2,050 $1,802 Costs & Expenses 5,400 1/ 61,704 19,267 2,011 1,681 Interest Expense 311 3,183 1,328 164 187 Other Income and Adjustments 2/ 1,958 6,917 1,042 (418) 13 Income Taxes 1,385 3,342 2,378 (166) (16) Net Income 1,929 3/ 4,669 4,220 (377) (37) Earnings per Share 6.13 0.89 2.25 (1.82) 0.15 Dividends per Share 1.29 0.70 0.76 0 0 Average Shares Outstanding (millions) 314 3,486 1,876 212 266 Total Assets 12,182 242,223 50,925 6,478 6,955 Property, Plant and Equipment - Net 6,549 51,161 24,157 2,966 3,510 Long-Term Debt 4,612 33,092 12,463 2,507 3,062 Shareholders' Equity 5,095 103,198 16,912 2,022 1,720 Operating Data Customer Lines (thousands) 2,572 - 4/ 25,908 4/ 1,049
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/SOCC/01socc.pdf
  • Company Revenues $7,599 $52,550 $24,130 $2,351 $2,457 Costs and Expenses 5,934 1/ 48,796 17,789 2,522 2,224 Interest Expense 289 3,242 1,315 168 379 Other Income and Adjustments 2/ 395 6,412 (1,009) (27) 41 Income Taxes 704 (791) 1,447 (80) (15) Net Income 1,067 3/ 7,715 2,570 (286) (90) Earnings per Share 3.42 2.50 1.37 (1.36) (0.38) Dividends per Share 1.33 0.15 0.76 0 0 Average Shares Outstanding (millions) 311 3,643 1,875 217 281 Property, Plant and Equipment - Net 6,781 41,322 24,943 3,060 4,512 Total Assets 12,609 165,282 52,046 6,312 10,554 Long-Term Debt 3,862 40,527 15,014 2,702 5,535 Shareholders' Equity 5,566 51,680 18,597 1,678 1,946 Operating Data Customer Lines (thousands) 2,612 - 4/ 25,422 4/ 1,032 2,481 Number of Employees 23,955
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/SOCC/02socc.pdf
  • $0.38 Dominican Republic 8/ 9/ $1.39 $1.36 $1.29 $1.30 $1.10 $0.90 $0.70 $0.60 $0.38 $0.38 $0.38 $0.38 $0.38 Egypt 9/ $1.80 $1.70 $1.60 $1.50 $1.40 $1.40 $1.30 $1.30 $1.10 $0.70 $0.46 $0.46 $0.46 El Salvador 9/ $1.40 $1.30 $1.25 $1.20 $1.20 $1.10 $0.88 $0.77 $0.60 $0.48 $0.38 $0.38 $0.38 France 9/ 1.0 SDR 0.7 SDR 0.7 SDR0.42 SDR0.36 SDR0.24 SDR0.19 SDR0.15 SDR0.15 SDR0.15 SDR0.15 SDR0.15 SDR 0.15 SDR Germany 9/ 1.0 SDR 0.8 SDR 0.6 SDR0.34 SDR0.26 SDR0.16 SDR0.15 SDR0.15 SDR0.15 SDR0.15 SDR0.15 SDR0.15 SDR 0.15 SDR Greece 9/ 1.53 SDR1.21 SDR1.12 SDR .95 SDR .85 SDR 0.7 SDR 0.63 SDR 0.4 SDR 0.22 SDR0.2 SDR0.2 SDR0.2 SDR 0.2 SDR Guatemala 9/ $1.50 $1.40 $1.30 $1.20 $1.18 $1.00 $0.90 $0.77 $0.64
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/SOCC/03socc.pdf
  • $0.36 $0.36 Colombia $1.55 $1.50 $1.40 $1.30 $1.25 $1.00 $0.80 $0.65 $0.55 $0.38 Dominican Republic $1.36 $1.29 $1.30 $1.10 $0.90 $0.70 $0.60 $0.38 $0.38 Egypt $1.70 $1.60 $1.50 $1.40 $1.40 $1.30 $1.30 $1.10 $0.70 El Salvador $1.30 $1.25 $1.20 $1.20 $1.10 $0.88 $0.77 $0.60 $0.48 $0.38 France 0.7 SDR0.7 SDR0.42 SDR0.36 SDR0.24 SDR0.19 SDR Germany 0.8 SDR0.6 SDR0.34 SDR0.26 SDR0.16 SDR0.15 SDR Greece 1.21 SDR1.12 SDR0.95 SDR0.85 SDR0.7 SDR0.63 SDR0.4 SDR0.22 SDR Guatemala $1.40 $1.30 $1.20 $1.18 $1.00 $0.90 $0.77 $0.64 $0.51 Haiti $1.35 $1.30 $1.25 $1.20 $1.20 $1.20 $1.20 $1.00 $0.92 $0.70 $0.60 $0.46 Hong Kong $1.60 $1.20 $1.00 $1.000.65 SDR0.58 SDR0.52 SDR India $2.00 $1.90 $1.80 $1.80 $1.60 $1.42 $1.28 $1.08 $0.85 $0.68 $0.46 $0.46 Israel $2.28 $2.16 $2.16
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/SOCC/95socc.pdf
  • 1.54 13.3 IN IOWA 25.2 23.5 1.8 2.5 (0.8) (2.49) (2.10) (2.07) (6.65) 5.9 IA KANSAS 54.2 32.5 21.7 15.9 5.9 0.11 0.07 0.09 0.26 5.6 KS KENTUCKY 105.3 44.3 61.1 54.5 6.6 0.47 (0.45) 0.12 0.14 6.4 KY LOUISIANA 143.9 37.4 106.5 100.9 5.6 (0.33) (0.01) (0.10) (0.44) 6.0 LA MAINE 23.0 3.4 19.5 15.1 4.4 0.20 (0.06) 0.00 0.15 4.3 ME MARYLAND 290.0 220.5 69.6 44.6 24.9 4.77 2.00 2.30 9.07 15.8 MD MASSACHUSETTS 205.6 43.4 162.2 129.5 32.7 3.47 1.05 1.10 5.62 27.1 MA MICHIGAN 233.5 115.6 117.8 97.8 20.0 (0.95) 0.10 0.28 (0.57) 20.6 MI MINNESOTA 26.2 33.6 (7.4) (7.1) (0.4) (3.00) (1.41) (1.37) (5.79) 5.4 MN MISSISSIPPI 55.2 19.4 35.8 31.2 4.6 (0.33) 0.02 (0.03) (0.34)
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/SOCC/96socc.pdf
  • 1.72 1.35 5.82 5.0 UT VERMONT 19.4 4.2 15.2 12.6 2.6 0.34 0.09 0.06 0.49 2.1 VT VIRGINIA 493.0 356.5 136.5 105.0 31.5 5.09 0.85 2.31 8.26 23.3 VA WASHINGTON 165.5 107.4 58.1 44.9 13.2 (2.18) (0.26) 0.17 (2.27) 15.5WA WEST VIRGINIA 62.7 47.4 15.3 10.5 4.7 0.99 0.35 0.29 1.63 3.1WV WISCONSIN 102.8 67.7 35.1 25.4 9.7 0.49 (0.14) 0.15 0.50 9.2 WI WYOMING (0.7) 3.3 (4.0) (3.3) (0.6) (1.20) (0.64) (0.33) (2.17) 1.5WY PUERTO RICO 77.7 88.8 (11.1) (10.0) (1.0) (5.95) (2.75) (3.24) (11.94) 10.9 PR UNCLASSIFIED 17.9 17.9 SEE NOTES FOLLOWING TABLE 2.20 170 STATISTICS OF COMMUNICATIONS COMMON CARRIERS TABLE 2.14 - TOTAL OPERATING EXPENSES OF REPORTING LOCAL EXCHANGE CARRIERS FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1996 (
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/SOCC/97socc.pdf
  • 12.52 MD MASSACHUSETTS 374.9 374.9 374.9 (0.04) (0.04)MA MICHIGAN 799.4 0.069 799.3 798.2 1.12 1.12 MI MINNESOTA 52.7 0.386 52.3 51.0 1.26 1.26 MN MISSISSIPPI 87.0 87.0 86.5 0.50 0.50 MS MISSOURI 239.3 1.309 238.0 213.9 24.12 24.12 MO MONTANA 42.3 0.034 42.3 42.2 0.08 0.08 MT NEBRASKA 52.2 0.641 51.5 49.4 2.15 2.15 NE NEVADA 19.9 (0.220) 20.1 20.0 0.15 0.15 NV NEW HAMPSHIRE 86.2 86.2 86.3 (0.01) (0.01)NH NEW JERSEY 645.3 (0.076) 645.3 627.0 18.39 2.2 4.1 6.3 12.10 NJ NEW MEXICO 61.3 0.004 61.3 61.2 0.05 0.05 NM NEW YORK 267.1 (0.686) 267.8 250.9 16.86 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.2 16.66 NY NORTH CAROLINA 110.7 0.080 110.6 109.0 1.65 1.65 NC NORTH DAKOTA 35.0 1.209 33.8 31.1 2.74 2.74
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/SOCC/98SOCC.PDF
  • (0.33) 0.05 (0.50) 8.0 MN MISSISSIPPI 51.8 26.3 25.5 18.2 7.3 0.11 0.05 0.07 0.23 7.1 MS MISSOURI 315.6 259.5 56.1 38.9 17.2 0.39 (0.38) 0.28 0.30 16.9 MO MONTANA 4.8 8.2 (3.4) (2.8) (0.6) (1.29) (0.62) (0.44) (2.35) 1.8 MT NEBRASKA 127.7 48.2 79.5 60.9 18.6 5.53 3.28 4.73 13.53 5.1 NE NEVADA 145.0 95.5 49.4 39.2 10.2 0.06 (0.15) 0.04 (0.05) 10.3 NV NEW HAMPSHIRE 50.3 15.2 35.1 26.7 8.4 0.65 0.28 0.38 1.31 7.1 NH NEW JERSEY 366.6 226.5 140.1 61.7 78.4 11.85 5.30 7.21 24.36 54.1 NJ NEW MEXICO 46.5 31.4 15.1 10.9 4.2 (0.42) (0.13) (0.01) (0.56) 4.7 NM NEW YORK 740.8 335.2 405.6 286.7 118.9 15.61 11.78 8.69 36.08 82.8 NY NORTH CAROLINA 415.4 308.5
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/SOCC/99socc.pdf
  • 67.4 18.12 1.8 3.4 5.3 12.85MD Massachusetts 354.9 354.9 354.9 (0.04) (0.04)MA Michigan 730.7 0.022 730.7 730.6 0.10 0.10 MI Minnesota 30.6 0.158 30.5 29.8 0.67 0.67MN Mississippi 74.9 74.9 74.7 0.19 0.19 MS Missouri 185.8 185.8 171.0 14.79 14.79MO Montana 17.7 0.013 17.7 17.7 0.03 0.03 MT Nebraska 30.6 0.321 30.3 28.9 1.34 1.34 NE Nevada 13.6 13.6 13.8 (0.15) (0.15)NV New Hampshire 60.5 60.5 60.5 (0.00) (0.00)NH New Jersey 524.6 524.6 518.3 6.31 1.2 2.2 3.4 2.90 NJ New Mexico 27.9 (0.001) 27.9 27.9 (0.01) (0.01)NM New York 245.9 245.9 233.6 12.30 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.1 12.21NY North Carolina 90.2 0.009 90.2 89.1 1.05 1.05NC North Dakota 19.4 0.588 18.8 16.7 2.17 2.17ND Ohio 186.9 5.468 181.4 179.7 1.71
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/SOCC/prelim02socc.pdf
  • $0.38 Dominican Republic 8/ 10/ $1.39 $1.36 $1.29 $1.30 $1.10 $0.90 $0.70 $0.60 $0.38 $0.38 $0.38 $0.38 $0.38 Egypt 10/ $1.80 $1.70 $1.60 $1.50 $1.40 $1.40 $1.30 $1.30 $1.10 $0.70 $0.46 $0.46 $0.46 El Salvador 10/ $1.40 $1.30 $1.25 $1.20 $1.20 $1.10 $0.88 $0.77 $0.60 $0.48 $0.38 $0.38 $0.38 France 10/ 1.0 SDR 0.7 SDR 0.7 SDR0.42 SDR0.36 SDR0.24 SDR0.19 SDR0.15 SDR0.15 SDR0.15 SDR0.15 SDR0.15 SDR 0.15 SDR Germany 10/ 1.0 SDR 0.8 SDR 0.6 SDR0.34 SDR0.26 SDR0.16 SDR0.15 SDR0.15 SDR0.15 SDR0.15 SDR0.15 SDR0.15 SDR 0.15 SDR Greece 10/ 1.53 SDR1.21 SDR1.12 SDR .95 SDR .85 SDR 0.7 SDR 0.63 SDR 0.4 SDR 0.22 SDR0.2 SDR0.2 SDR0.2 SDR 0.2 SDR Guatemala 10/ $1.50 $1.40 $1.30 $1.20 $1.18 $1.00 $0.90 $0.77 $0.64
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/scard95.pdf
  • Served with 20 or More Complaints in 1995 APPENDIX A Company Complaints (Notes) Complaints per Million $ in Revenues Info Access, Inc. 563 100,000,000 (6) 5.63 Integretel 425 600,000,000 (7) 0.71 Inter Continental Telephone 91 International Telemedia Associates, Inc. 234 100,000,000 (6) 2.34 LCI International Worldwide Telecommunications 45 671,000,000 (2) 0.07 LD Services, Inc. 95 LDDS WORLDCOM 559 3,640,000,000 (2) 0.15 LDM Systems, Inc. 29 Long Distance Billing Company, Inc. 71 Long Distance Direct, Inc. 39 Long Distance Wholesale Club 30 Matrix Telecom 58 MCI Telecommunications Corporation 1,706 12,924,000,000 (2) 0.13 Mid-Wats, Inc. 22 MIDCOM Communications, Inc. 93 204,000,000 (2) 0.46 Millenium Telecom/Consortium 2000, Inc. 56 National Accounts Long Distance, Inc. 129 100,000,000 (3) 1.29 National Telephone and Communications, Inc. 31
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/scard97.pdf
  • their local telephone company to resolve their complaints before sending a written complaint to the FCC. If the local tele- phone company successfully resolves a complaint, it may not be necessary for consumers to file a complaint with the FCC. NOTE: Service of a complaint does not necessarily indicate wrongdoing by the served company. Figure 7 TRENDS 0.00 0.05 0.10 0.15 0.20 0.25 0.30 U S WEST United SBC SNET Pacific T elesis NYNEX GTE Citiz ens Cincinnati Bell BellSouth Bell Atlantic Amer itech ALL TEL COMPLAINTS PER MILLION DOLLARS TOTAL COMPLAINTS SERVED TOTAL NON-SLAMMING COMPLAINTS SERVED Figure 7 shows the local telephone companies that were served with more than 50 complaints during 1996. Appendix A to this Scorecard lists for
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/scard98.pdf
  • for dis- puted long distance calls on be- half of the long distance company that transmitted the calls. In this case, the local telephone company is served because it has entered into a contractual arrangement to render bills for such calls. A local telephone company may also be served with complaints Non-slamming Complaints Served Slamming Complaints Served 0 0.05 0.1 0.15 0.2 0.25 0.3 ALLTELAmeritechBell AtlanticBellSouth Cincinnati Bell CitizensFrontier GTE SNET SB S Complaints Per Million Dollars 34 COMMON CARRIER SCORECARD REPORT Description of Appendices Appendix A All Types of Telephone- Related Complaints APPENDICES Appendix A lists the 108 companies served more than 50 complaints during 1997. The total number of complaints served on each com- pany is based on information
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/in-region_applications/bellsouth_sc/bs271sc.pdf
  • process. 38. Pricing of unbundled network elements satisfies the cost proxies proposed in the FCC Order. Charges for local loops at $18.00 per loop is at the ceiling of the FCC default range. The per minute charge of 0.3¢ for local switching is the midpoint of the FCC default range of 0.2 ¢ to 0.4¢ per minute. The rate of 0.15¢/min for tandem switching is at the FCC default ceiling for this unbundled network element. The rates for these and other elements are subject to a "true up" by the SCPSC intended to adjust rates to economic costs. CLECs would continue to pay the negotiated rate if the true up resulted in a higher rate. If rates fell, they would receive
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Public_Notices/MDS_Notices/md980415.pdf
  • PR CONDITIONAL LICENSE Lat. 18 03 37 N. - Long. 067 0 20 W. CARRETERA 118 2.6KM, SAN GERMAN, PR Call Sign WLW756 Antenna C/L 103 FT. ( 31.39 meters) non-common carrier status. Increase Power, Change Emission ________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 50332-CM-P-98 TEEWINOT LICENSING, INC. (channel 1) TWIN FALLS, ID CONDITIONAL LICENSE Lat. 42 43 54 N. - Long. 114 25 04 W. 0.15 MI. WSW OF FLAT BUTTE, ID, TWIN FALLS, ID Call Sign WKR64 Antenna C/L 135 FT. ( 41.15 meters) non-common carrier status. Increase Power, Change Emission ________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 50333-CM-P-98 TEEWINOT LICENSING, INC. (E group) TWIN FALLS, ID CONDITIONAL LICENSE Lat. 42 43 54 N. - Long. 114 25 04 W. .15 MI. WSW OF FLAT TOP BUTTE, TWIN FALLS, ID Call
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/OPP/working_papers/oppwp38chart.pdf
  • Page 3 (746 - 960 MHz) Page 5 (1215 - 1435 MHz) Page 9 (2165 - 2390 MHz) Page 12 (2900 - 3100 MHz) John R. Williams FCC/OPP 3/7/2002 Expanded Chart BAND BANDWIDTH RADIO SERVICES FROM FCC's ONLINE ALLOCATION TABLE Revised as of September 25, 2001 322-328.6 6.6FIXED, MOBILE, G27, S5.149. 328.6-335.4 6.8AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION, S5.258. 335.4-399.9 64.5FIXED,MOBILE, G27, G100. 399.9-400.05 0.15 MOBILE-SATELLITE (Earth-to-space), RADIONAVIGATION-SATELLITE, S5.260, US319, US322. 400.05-400.15 0.1 STANDARD FREQUENCY AND TIME SIGNAL-SATELLITE (400.1 MHz), S5.261 400.15-401 0.85 METEOROLOGICAL AIDS (radiosonde), METEOROLOGICAL-SATELLITE (space-to-Earth), MOBILE-SATELLITE (space-to-Earth), SPACE RESEARCH (space-to-Earth), Space operation (space-to-Earth), S5.263, 647B, 599B, US319, US320, US324, US70 401-402 1 METEOROLOGICAL AIDS (radiosonde), SPACE OPERATION (space-to-Earth), Earth exploration-satellite (Earth-to-space), Meteorological-satellite (Earth-to-space), US70. 402-403 1 METEOROLOGICAL AIDS (radiosonde), Earth exploration-satellite (Earth-to-space),
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireline_Competition/Orders/2002/fcc02118.pdf
  • 0 0 a,b,c,d,e PR-8-02-2200 Open Orders in a Hold Status > 90 Days 4.17 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 a,b,c,d,e RESALE (MAINTENANCE) POTS ­ Maintenance MR-2 ­ Trouble Report Rate MR-2-02-2100 Network Trouble Report Rate ­ Loop 0.92 0.26 0.77 0.29 0.57 0.24 0.67 0.2 0.58 0.25 MR-2-03-2100 Network Trouble Report Rate ­ Central Office 0.14 0.15 0.06 0.04 0.04 0.03 0.05 0.06 0.06 0.1 MR-2-04-2100 % Subsequent Reports 11.59 9.64 10.31 0 11.71 1.92 3.92 2.9 MR-2-05-2100 % CPE/TOK/FOK Trouble Report Rate 0.82 0.28 0.65 0.31 0.51 0.15 0.26 0.26 MR-3 ­ Missed Repair Appointments MR-3-01-2110 % Missed Repair Appointment ­ Loop Bus. 16.4 9.76 10.75 8 10.65 13.95 13.94 5.56 16.72 4.76 MR-3-01-2120 % Missed
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2006/DA-06-1646A1.html
  • satellites in the C-band and the Ku-band. Id. at 1-2. 47 C.F.R. S 25.118. August 17, 2005, Fleet Management Notice, Exhibit 2. See Public Notice, "Policy Branch Information," 20 FCC Rcd 15816, 15817-18 (2005). Section 25.210(j) requires that the satellite operate within 0.05'0 of its assigned location. See 47 C.F.R. S 25.210(j). Intelsat's request involved moving the Intelsat 604 spacecraft 0.15'0 from its assigned location. See Request for Special Temporary Authority Intelsat 604, SAT-STA-20060130-00011 filed January 30, 2006. Attachment to STA Grant dated January 30, 2006. Letter from William H. Davenport, Chief, Investigations and Hearings Division, Enforcement Bureau, Federal Communications Commission, to Intelsat North America LLC dated June 21, 2006. See id. at 5. See Letter from Robert L. Pettit, Esq.,
• http://www.fcc.gov/ftp/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Databases/documents_collection/76-101.html http://www.fcc.gov/ftp/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Databases/documents_collection/76-101.pdf
  • general idea of the magnitude of changes in phase delay occurring in two different types of cable, for different lengths of cable. Change in delay in degrees for cables of specified lengths over a temperature range of -20 to +140 degrees F ------------------Cable Length-------------------- Frequency (kHz) 100 feet 500 feet 1000 feet Dielectric 550 0.016 0.08 0.16 Primarily 1000 0.03 0.15 0.29 Air 1600 0.05 0.24 0.47 Foamed 550 0.09 0.45 0.89 Polyethylene 1000 0.17 0.83 1.7 Dielectric 1600 0.27 1.32 2.65 These figures are representative for phase-stabilized cable of the types shown. Solid dielectric cable may have a phase / temperature coefficient as much as three times as great as cable with foamed polyethylene dielectric, and its use obviously would
• http://www.fcc.gov/ib/pd/pf/TABALL02.pdf
  • 124,922 22,637 0.20 0.18 0.12 0.37 8 7 5 7 6Australia 9,292 43,344 55,242 107,878 41,677 0.09 0.06 0.09 0.11 1 8 n.a. 27 19Denmark 4,979 831 89,309 95,119 87,501 0.06 0.23 0.24 0.46 1 9 17 19 14Switzerland 3,912 72,353 0 76,265 2,125 0.05 0.22 0.45 0.30 7 10 18 14 9Hong Kong 2,553 18,588 51,629 72,770 4,403 0.04 0.15 0.11 0.11 7 11 10 12 13Singapore 1,990 55,576 6,344 63,910 4,744 0.03 0.03 0.04 0.10 7 12 9 10 18China 1,585 52,979 245 54,809 85,937 0.03 0.03 0.06 0.45 7 13 8 8 10Korea, South 3,037 36,700 1,261 40,998 27,085 0.08 0.05 0.08 0.29 1 14 n.a. n.a. n.a.Austria 387 39,021 0 39,408 229 0.01 0.20 3.26 2.99 1
• http://www.fcc.gov/ib/pd/pf/csreport_2000.pdf
  • 1,261 17,387 1,299 0.11 0.11 0.26 0.41 7 15 22 15 17Taiwan 3,602 12,955 631 17,188 1,137 0.27 0.29 0.70 1.64 1 16 24 17 18Italy 2,740 10,294 0 13,034 4,260 0.27 3.29 2.35 1.98 3 17 14 24 26Israel 1,357 9,138 240 10,735 388 0.14 0.21 0.75 1.28 6 18 16 29 n.a .Chile 1,177 7,847 90 9,114 373 0.15 0.22 0.82 1.08 1 19 13 14 19Switzerland 2,799 6,235 0 9,034 1,947 0.45 0.30 1.43 1.11 7 20 23 n.a . 21India 1,839 5,920 0 7,759 280 0.31 0.46 1.40 1.77 6 21 20 23 29Argentina 1,041 6,347 151 7,539 8,467 0.16 0.22 0.46 0.76 7 22 17 13 12Philippines 3,862 3,647 2 7,511 1,567 1.06 1.59 2.17 3.42
• http://www.fcc.gov/ib/sand/agree/files/mex-bc/am.pdf
  • 50% 1.43 1.33 1.23 1.15 1.07 1.00 0.94 0.88 0.83 0.79 01.75 0.71 0.67 0.64 0.61 0.58 0.55 0.53 - 0.51 0.48 - 0.46 0.45 0.43. --_ 0.41 - 0.40 .- s. 0.38 -. 0.37. '-. . . ._.. 0.36 0.34 0.33 0.32 0.30 . 0.28 . 0.27 0.25 0.24 0.23 0.22 0.21 0.20 0.19 0.18 0.17 . 0.17 0.16 0.15 0.15 0.14 0.14 ii-:3 . llj .- 0.x ir M/e.- Fuclofs given in lefms of hour wifh fespec: to 1 [ sunset ut mid-pcinl of tfansmissl'on path. . 1 ,a.. , I'. .e,..- , -. .5 .5 .7 .3 .3 LG 1.1 1.2 L.3 1.c 1.5 1 rr=cuenc*,~ ir: Et!!= -.. 9.' -- - \ -c) .- . . .
• http://www.fcc.gov/ib/sand/agree/files/mex-bc/usmexdars.pdf
  • no. 97520353 BR3a/BR3b Provision referenceRR1060 C BR2 Adm. serial no. A4a1 Orbital long. 85 W A4a2a Long. tolerance0.1 W - 0.1 E A4a2b Inclination excursion 0.5 A4a3 Visibility arc 110 W - 70 W A4a4 Service arc87 W - 85 W A4a5 Reason for arc diff. 1 B1a/B1b Beam designationSD B2 Emi-RcpE B3a1/B3b1/B3b2a Max. ant. gain 38.5 B3d Pointing accuracy 0.15 B3a2/B3b2b Ant. gain cont. diag. 2 B3f Ant. gain vs orbit long. diag. B3e1 Rad. diag. B3e2 Ref. pat. B3e3 Coef. A B3e4 Coef. B BR7a/BR7b Group id. 97902731 BR14 Special SectionAR11/C/3269 RES33/C/83 C4a Class of station EB C3a Assigned freq. band 25000 C4b Nature of service CP C6a Polarization typeLC C6b Polarization angle 0 C8d/C8g Max. pwr 36 C11a1
• http://www.fcc.gov/ib/sand/agree/files/mex-nb/usmexdars.pdf
  • no. 97520353 BR3a/BR3b Provision referenceRR1060 C BR2 Adm. serial no. A4a1 Orbital long. 85 W A4a2a Long. tolerance0.1 W - 0.1 E A4a2b Inclination excursion 0.5 A4a3 Visibility arc 110 W - 70 W A4a4 Service arc87 W - 85 W A4a5 Reason for arc diff. 1 B1a/B1b Beam designationSD B2 Emi-RcpE B3a1/B3b1/B3b2a Max. ant. gain 38.5 B3d Pointing accuracy 0.15 B3a2/B3b2b Ant. gain cont. diag. 2 B3f Ant. gain vs orbit long. diag. B3e1 Rad. diag. B3e2 Ref. pat. B3e3 Coef. A B3e4 Coef. B BR7a/BR7b Group id. 97902731 BR14 Special SectionAR11/C/3269 RES33/C/83 C4a Class of station EB C3a Assigned freq. band 25000 C4b Nature of service CP C6a Polarization typeLC C6b Polarization angle 0 C8d/C8g Max. pwr 36 C11a1
• http://www.fcc.gov/ib/sand/mniab/traffic/files/ITRND01.pdf
  • 6,384.9 2,501.8 0.92 0.51 0.41 0.39 0.40 199515,888.8 14,335.4 7,569.0 6,766.4 7,050.6 2,464.1 0.90 0.48 0.43 0.35 0.40 199619,325.1 14,597.8 8,252.3 6,345.5 8,293.2 2,450.9 0.76 0.43 0.33 0.30 0.32 199722,753.1 15,661.6 8,031.0 7,630.5 9,170.0 2,458.9 0.69 0.35 0.34 0.27 0.32 199824,249.9 14,726.3 7,021.7 7,704.5 10,198.5 2,158.2 0.61 0.29 0.32 0.21 0.29 199928,515.4 14,980.3 6,383.1 8,597.3 10,765.0 1,576.0 0.53 0.22 0.30 0.15 0.26 200030,134.8 14,908.8 5,536.0 9,372.8 12,888.2 1,447.6 0.49 0.18 0.31 0.11 0.25 200133,286.8 11,379.6 4,526.2 6,853.5 13,478.0 1,118.4 0.34 0.14 0.21 0.08 0.17 200235,988.3 9,956 3,872.9 6,083.6 13,676.8 738.0 0.28 0.11 0.17 0.05 0.14 200342,664.3 8,977 3,649.3 5,294.3 15,674.0 669.3 0.21 0.09 0.12 0.04 0.10 See notes at the end of the tables. U.S. Billed Amounts Table 3 Selected Traffic
• http://www.fcc.gov/mb/engineering/76print.html
  • operators will adjust the residual component using FCC Form 1210 (or FCC Form 1211, where applicable) or FCC Form 1240.

     ----------------------------------------------------------------------- - Per-channel Average No. of regulated channels adjustment factor ----------------------------------------------------------------------- - 7.......................................................... $0.52 7.5........................................................ 0.45 8.......................................................... 0.40 8.5........................................................ 0.36 9.......................................................... 0.33 9.5........................................................ 0.29 10......................................................... 0.27 10.5....................................................... 0.24 11......................................................... 0.22 11.5....................................................... 0.20 12......................................................... 0.19 12.5....................................................... 0.17 13......................................................... 0.16 13.5....................................................... 0.15 14......................................................... 0.14 14.5....................................................... 0.13 15-15.5.................................................... 0.12 16......................................................... 0.11 16.5-17.................................................... 0.10 17.5-18.................................................... 0.09 18.5-19.................................................... 0.08 19.5-21.5.................................................. 0.07 22-23.5.................................................... 0.06 24-26...................................................... 0.05 26.5-29.5.................................................. 0.04 30-35.5.................................................... 0.03 36-46...................................................... 0.02 46.5-99.5.................................................. 0.01 ----------------------------------------------------------------------- - 

    In order to adjust the residual component of the tier charge when there is an increase in the number of channels on a tier, the operator shall perform the

• http://www.fcc.gov/mb/engineering/part76.pdf
  • per month by which cable operators will adjust the residual component using FCC Form 1210 (or FCC Form 1211, where applicable) or FCC Form 1240. Average No. of regulated channels Per-channel adjustment factor 7 $0.52 7.5 0.45 8 0.40 8.5 0.36 9 0.33 9.5 0.29 10 0.27 10.5 0.24 11 0.22 11.5 0.20 12 0.19 12.5 0.17 13 0.16 13.5 0.15 14 0.14 14.5 0.13 15­15.5 0.12 16 0.11 16.5­17 0.10 17.5­18 0.09 18.5­19 0.08 Page 132of 243 Electronic Code of Federal Regulations: 5/6/2011 http://ecfr.gpoaccess.gov/cgi/t/text/text-idx?c=ecfr&sid=a0b1c7045abd9e3f08f6d3233a640e58&rg... In order to adjust the residual component of the tier charge when there is an increase in the number of channels on a tier, the operator shall perform the following calculations: (i) Take the sum of
• http://www.fcc.gov/mb/peer_review/prrespstudy4.pdf
  • significance at the 1 percent level ** indicates significance at the 5 percent level * indicates significance at the 10 percent level 12 Table I.10R Group Fixed Effects Model Controlling for Market-Year and Network, for News and Public Affairs Minutes N4: News Minutes PA4: Public Affairs Minutes Variable Coefficient Rob. Std. Error Coefficient Rob. Std. Error OtherCoOwnStationsinDMANews[PubAff]Mint 0.03 * 0.02 0.15 ** 0.07 Local Marketing Agreement -6.75 106.17 1.78 30.97 MultiNetworkAffil -195.74 126.28 -2.24 31.79 NonCommercial -315.20 *** 94.47 80.69 212.45 VHF Channel 706.81 *** 71.51 5.70 18.21 ParentRevenueMillions 0.46 *** 0.07 -0.07 ** 0.03 OtherCoOwnedStationsinDMACount -33.78 47.55 -52.57 * 28.84 ParentStationsCount -5.63 *** 2.09 0.02 1.05 Locally Owned -130.20 * 66.87 25.28 42.24 O and O Big Four 435.28 **
• http://www.fcc.gov/mb/peer_review/prrespstudy4c.pdf
  • Per Person Variable Coefficient P-value Odds Ratio Coefficient P-value Odds Ratio News Format Prior Period 6.59*** 0.00 727.49 6.59*** 0.000 725.18 AM Station 1.81*** 0.00 6.10 1.85*** 0.000 6.35 Crossowned With Newspaper 1.46** 0.04 4.29 1.43** 0.041 4.16 Crossowned With TV Station 0.79*** 0.00 2.20 0.79*** 0.000 2.21 Commercial Station -1.45*** 0.00 0.24 -1.50*** 0.000 0.22 Local Marketing Agreement -0.42 0.15 0.66 -0.39 0.182 0.67 Sibling News Station in Market 0.39*** 0.01 1.47 0.41*** 0.007 1.51 Owner in Same State 0.24* 0.06 1.27 0.23* 0.078 1.26 Parent Stations in Market 0.04 0.16 1.04 0.05 0.138 1.05 Broadband Lines per Person -6.21 0.360 0.00 Year 2002 -0.13 0.41 0.88 -0.77 0.260 0.46 Year 2003 -0.11 0.49 0.90 -0.57 0.259 0.56 Year 2004
• http://www.fcc.gov/ownership/materials/already-released/consumer090002.pdf
  • 143 57.96 64.25 65.97 68.84 Jul-00 143 51.71 64.34 63.11 Nov-00 143 55.78 61.30 63.90 66.82 Feb-01 143 56.22 62.51 65.35 68.20 May-01 143 55.45 61.21 63.15 66.17 Jul-01 143 49.06 49.57 61.41 49 Table 4: Radio Formats, 1993 & 1997 1993 1997 N % N % Adult Contemp (AC) 462 8.44 AC 418 6.62 AC/Album Oriented Rock (AOR) 8 0.15 AC/AOR 4 0.06 AC/ Contemp. Hit Radio (CHR) 10 0.18 AC/CHR 128 2.03 AC/Full Service (FS) 1 0.02 AC/NR 42 0.67 AC/Oldies (O) 5 0.09 AC/SAC 8 0.13 AOR 565 10.32 AOR 375 5.94 AOR/AC 5 0.09 AOR/AC 3 0.05 Black (B) 281 5.13 AOR/NR 200 3.17 B/AC 13 0.24 AOR/P 80 1.27 B/Gospel (G) 4 0.07 B 236 3.74
• http://www.fcc.gov/ownership/materials/already-released/programdiversity090002.pdf
  • use this index as a determinant of lack of diversity. While Dominick and Pearce allowed us to evaluate concentration within the top three categories of programming, HHI goes one step further by taking into account all program types on the schedule. The following chart provides the Herfindahl indices for the years being studied. Figure 3 Herfindahl Index 0 0.05 0.1 0.15 0.2 0.25 196619671968196919701971197219731974 19891990199119921993199419951996199719981999200020012002 Year Lower Data Points = Greater Diversity Herfindahl Index As with the Dominick index, the 1970s showed a marked decline in program diversity on the networks suggesting a strong concentration of programming into a few program types. The HHI follows the same pattern as the Dominick Pearce index. The pattern is consistent ­ after the rules
• http://www.fcc.gov/ownership/roundtable_docs/waldfogel-a.pdf
  • 1 1 2 3 5 Hybrid Zips Total Circulation 7,397 4,665 29 515 2,269 5,674 18,327 Circulation Per Capita 7,397 0.32 0.01 0.12 0.20 0.30 0.58 Circulation Per Household 7,392 0.97 0.02 0.34 0.54 0.79 1.57 Circulated Papers 7,397 2.92 1 1 2 4 7 MSA's Total Circulation 269 129,735 21,092 30,989 50,946 104,769 540,584 Circulation Per Capita 269 0.23 0.15 0.20 0.23 0.26 0.33 Circulation Per Household 269 .59 0.42 0.53 0.59 0.65 0.78 Circulated Papers 269 8.72 2 4 6 10 22 Paper Equivalents1 269 1.68 1.01 1.1 1.35 1.92 3.41 Newspaper Statistics2 (Burrelle's, Editor & Publisher) Newspaper Price 728 0.48 0.25 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 MSA Average Newspaper Price 234 0.49 0.35 0.48 0.50 0.50 0.57 Newspaper Pages