§ 101.1412   MVDDS eligibility restrictions for cable operators.

   (a) Eligibility for MVDDS license. No cable operator, nor any entity
   owning an attributable interest in a cable operator, shall have an
   attributable interest in an MVDDS license if such cable operator's
   service area significantly overlaps the MVDDS license area, as
   “significantly overlaps” is defined in paragraph (e) of this section.

   (b) Definition of cable operator. For the purposes of paragraph (a) of
   this section, the term “cable operator” means a company that is
   franchised to provide cable service, as defined in 47 CFR 76.5(ff) of
   this chapter, in all or part of the MVDDS license area.

   (c) For the purpose of this section, the term “MVPD household” refers
   to a household that subscribes to one or more Multichannel Video
   Program Distributors (MVPDs), as defined in 47 CFR 76.1000(e) of this
   chapter.

   (d) Waiver of restriction. Upon completion of the initial award of an
   MVDDS license, a cable operator may petition for a waiver of the
   restriction on eligibility based upon a showing that changed
   circumstances or new evidence indicate that no significant likelihood
   of substantial competitive harm will result from the operator retaining
   an attributable interest in the MVDDS license.

   (e) Significant overlap with service area. For purposes of paragraph
   (a) of this section, significant overlap occurs when a cable operator's
   subscribers in the MVDDS license area make up thirty-five percent or
   more of the MVPD households in that MVDDS license area.

   (f) Definition of attributable interest. For purposes of paragraph (a)
   of this section, an entity shall be considered to have an attributable
   interest in a cable operator or MVDDS licensee pursuant to the
   following criteria:

   (1) A controlling interest shall constitute an attributable interest.
   Controlling interest means majority voting equity ownership, any
   general partnership interest, or any means of actual working control
   (including negative control) over the operation of the entity, in
   whatever manner exercised.

   (2) Any general partnership interest in a partnership;

   (3) Partnership and similar ownership interests (including limited
   partnership interests) amounting to 20 percent or more of the total
   partnership interests, calculated according to both the percentage of
   equity paid in and the percentage of distribution of profits and
   losses;

   (4) Any stock interest amounting to 20 percent or more of the
   outstanding voting stock of an entity;

   (5) Any voting or non-voting stock interest, amounting to 20 percent or
   more of the total outstanding stock of an entity;

   (6) Stock interests held in trust that exceed the limit set forth in
   paragraph (f) of this section shall constitute an attributable interest
   of any person who holds or shares the power to vote such stock, of any
   person who has the sole power to sell such stock, and, in the case of
   stock held in trust, of any person who has the right to revoke the
   trust at will or to replace the trustee at will. If the trustee has a
   familial, personal, or extra-trust business relationship to the grantor
   or the beneficiary, the stock interests held in trust shall constitute
   an attributable interest of such grantor or beneficiary, as
   appropriate.

   (7) Debt and interests such as warrants and convertible debentures,
   options, or other interests (except non-voting stock) with rights of
   conversion to voting interests shall not constitute attributable
   interests unless and until conversion is effected.

   (8) An interest in a Limited Liability Company (LLC) or Registered
   Limited Liability Partnership (RLLP) amounting to 20 percent or more,
   shall constitute an attributable interest of each such limited partner.

   (9) Officers and directors of a cable operator, an MVDDS licensee, or
   an entity that controls such cable operator or MVDDS licensee, shall be
   considered to have an attributable interest in such cable operator or
   MVDDS licensee.

   (10) Ownership interests that are held indirectly by any party through
   one or more intervening corporations or other entities shall be
   determined by successive multiplication of the ownership percentages
   for each link in the vertical ownership chain and application of the
   relevant attribution benchmark to the resulting product, except that,
   if the ownership for any interest in any link in the chain exceeds 50
   percent or represents actual control, it shall be treated as if it were
   a 100 percent interest.

   (11) Any person who manages the operations of a cable operator or an
   MVDDS licensee pursuant to a management agreement shall be considered
   to have an attributable interest in such cable operator or MVDDS
   licensee, if such person or its affiliate has authority to make
   decisions or otherwise engage in practices or activities that
   determine, or significantly influence:

   (i) The nature or types of services offered by such entity;

   (ii) The terms upon which such services are offered; or

   (iii) The prices charged for such services.

   (12) Any person or its affiliate who enters into a joint marketing
   arrangement with a cable operator, an MVDDS licensee, or an affiliate
   of such entity, shall be considered to have an attributable interest in
   such cable operator, MVDDS licensee, or affiliate, if such person or
   its affiliate has authority to make decisions or otherwise engage in
   practices or activities that determine:

   (i) The nature or types of services offered by such entity;

   (ii) The terms upon which such services are offered; or

   (iii) The prices charged for such services.

   (g) Divestiture. Any cable operator, or any entity owning an
   attributable interest in a cable operator, that would otherwise be
   barred from acquiring an attributable interest in an MVDDS license by
   the eligibility restriction in paragraph (a) of this section, may be a
   party to an MVDDS application (i.e., have an attributable interest in
   the applicant), and such applicant will be eligible for an MVDDS
   license, pursuant to the divestiture procedures set forth in paragraphs
   (g)(1) through (g)(6) of this section.

   (1) Divestiture shall be limited to the following prescribed means:

   (i) An MVDDS applicant holding an attributable interest in a cable
   operator may divest such interest in the cable company.

   (ii) Other MVDDS applicants disqualified under paragraph (a) of this
   section, will be permitted to:

   (A) Partition and divest that portion of the existing service area that
   causes it to exceed the overlap restriction in paragraph (a) of this
   section, subject to applicable regulations of state and local
   governments; or

   (B) Partition and divest that portion of the MVDDS geographic service
   area that exceeds the overlap restriction in paragraph (a) of this
   section.

   (iii) Divestiture may be to an interim trustee if a buyer has not been
   secured in the required period of time, as long as the MVDDS applicant
   has no interest in or control of the trustee and the trustee may
   dispose of the license as it sees fit.

   (2) The MVDDS applicant shall certify as an exhibit to its short form
   application that it and all parties to the application will come into
   compliance with paragraph (a) of this section.

   (3) If such MVDDS applicant is a successful bidder in an auction, it
   must submit with its long-form application a signed statement
   describing its efforts to date and future plans to come into compliance
   with the eligibility restrictions in paragraph (a) of this section.

   (4) If such an MVDDS applicant is otherwise qualified, its application
   will be granted subject to a condition that the applicant shall come
   into compliance with the eligibility restrictions in paragraph (a)
   within ninety (90) days of final grant of such MVDDS license.

   (5) An MVDDS applicant will be considered to have come into compliance
   with paragraph (a) of this section if:

   (i) In the case of the divestiture of a portion of an MVDDS license
   service area, it has successfully completed the assignment or transfer
   of control of the requisite portion of the MVDDS geographic service
   area.

   (ii) In all other cases, it has submitted to the Commission a signed
   certification that it has come into compliance with paragraph (a) of
   this section by the following means, identified in such certification:

   (A) By divestiture of a disqualifying interest in a cable operator,
   identified in terms of the interest owned, the owner of such interest
   (and, if such owner is not the applicant itself, the relationship of
   the owner to the applicant), the name of the party to whom such
   interest has been divested, and the date such divestiture was executed;
   or

   (B) By divestiture of the requisite portion of the cable operator's
   existing service area, identified in terms of the name of the party to
   whom such interest has been divested, the date such divestiture was
   executed, the name of any regulatory agency that must approve such
   divestiture, and the date on which an application was filed for this
   purpose with the regulatory agency.

   (6) If no such certification or application is tendered to the
   Commission within ninety (90) days of final grant of the initial
   license, the Commission may cancel or rescind the license
   automatically, shall retain all monies paid to the Commission, and,
   based on the facts presented, shall take any other action it may deem
   appropriate.

   Note to § 101.1412: Waivers of § 101.1412(f) may be granted upon an
   affirmative showing:

   (a) That the interest holder has less than a fifty percent voting
   interest in the licensee and there is an unaffiliated single holder of
   a fifty percent or greater voting interest;

   (b) That the interest holder is not likely to affect the local market
   in an anticompetitive manner;

   (c) That the interest holder is not involved in the operations of the
   licensee and does not have the ability to influence the licensee on a
   regular basis; and

   (d) That grant of a waiver is in the public interest because the
   benefits to the public of common ownership outweigh any potential
   anticompetitive harm to the market.

   [ 69 FR 31746 , June 7, 2004, as amended at  69 FR 59146 , Oct. 4, 2004]

   return arrow Back to Top