Goto Section: 51.321 | 51.325 | Table of Contents
FCC 51.323
Revised as of December 4, 2012
Goto Year:2011 |
2013
§ 51.323 Standards for physical collocation and virtual collocation.
(a) An incumbent LEC shall provide physical collocation and virtual
collocation to requesting telecommunications carriers.
(b) An incumbent LEC shall permit the collocation and use of any
equipment necessary for interconnection or access to unbundled network
elements.
(1) Equipment is necessary for interconnection if an inability to
deploy that equipment would, as a practical, economic, or operational
matter, preclude the requesting carrier from obtaining interconnection
with the incumbent LEC at a level equal in quality to that which the
incumbent obtains within its own network or the incumbent provides to
any affiliate, subsidiary, or other party.
(2) Equipment is necessary for access to an unbundled network element
if an inability to deploy that equipment would, as a practical,
economic, or operational matter, preclude the requesting carrier from
obtaining nondiscriminatory access to that unbundled network element,
including any of its features, functions, or capabilities.
(3) Multi-functional equipment shall be deemed necessary for
interconnection or access to an unbundled network element if and only
if the primary purpose and function of the equipment, as the requesting
carrier seeks to deploy it, meets either or both of the standards set
forth in paragraphs (b)(1) and (b)(2) of this section. For a piece of
equipment to be utilized primarily to obtain equal in quality
interconnection or nondiscriminatory access to one or more unbundled
network elements, there also must be a logical nexus between the
additional functions the equipment would perform and the
telecommunication services the requesting carrier seeks to provide to
its customers by means of the interconnection or unbundled network
element. The collocation of those functions of the equipment that, as
stand-alone functions, do not meet either of the standards set forth in
paragraphs (b)(1) and (b)(2) of this section must not cause the
equipment to significantly increase the burden on the incumbent's
property.
(c) Whenever an incumbent LEC objects to collocation of equipment by a
requesting telecommunications carrier for purposes within the scope of
section 251(c)(6) of the Act, the incumbent LEC shall prove to the
state commission that the equipment is not necessary for
interconnection or access to unbundled network elements under the
standards set forth in paragraph (b) of this section. An incumbent LEC
may not object to the collocation of equipment on the grounds that the
equipment does not comply with safety or engineering standards that are
more stringent than the safety or engineering standards that the
incumbent LEC applies to its own equipment. An incumbent LEC may not
object to the collocation of equipment on the ground that the equipment
fails to comply with Network Equipment and Building Specifications
performance standards or any other performance standards. An incumbent
LEC that denies collocation of a competitor's equipment, citing safety
standards, must provide to the competitive LEC within five business
days of the denial a list of all equipment that the incumbent LEC
locates at the premises in question, together with an affidavit
attesting that all of that equipment meets or exceeds the safety
standard that the incumbent LEC contends the competitor's equipment
fails to meet. This affidavit must set forth in detail: the exact
safety requirement that the requesting carrier's equipment does not
satisfy; the incumbent LEC's basis for concluding that the requesting
carrier's equipment does not meet this safety requirement; and the
incumbent LEC's basis for concluding why collocation of equipment not
meeting this safety requirement would compromise network safety.
(d) When an incumbent LEC provides physical collocation, virtual
collocation, or both, the incumbent LEC shall:
(1) Provide an interconnection point or points, physically accessible
by both the incumbent LEC and the collocating telecommunications
carrier, at which the fiber optic cable carrying an interconnector's
circuits can enter the incumbent LEC's premises, provided that the
incumbent LEC shall designate interconnection points as close as
reasonably possible to its premises;
(2) Provide at least two such interconnection points at each incumbent
LEC premises at which there are at least two entry points for the
incumbent LEC's cable facilities, and at which space is available for
new facilities in at least two of those entry points;
(3) Permit interconnection of copper or coaxial cable if such
interconnection is first approved by the state commission; and
(4) Permit physical collocation of microwave transmission facilities
except where such collocation is not practical for technical reasons or
because of space limitations, in which case virtual collocation of such
facilities is required where technically feasible.
(e) When providing virtual collocation, an incumbent LEC shall, at a
minimum, install, maintain, and repair collocated equipment meeting the
standards set forth in paragraph (b) of this section within the same
time periods and with failure rates that are no greater than those that
apply to the performance of similar functions for comparable equipment
of the incumbent LEC itself.
(f) An incumbent LEC shall provide space for the collocation of
equipment meeting the standards set forth in paragraph (b) of this
section in accordance with the following requirements:
(1) An incumbent LEC shall make space available within or on its
premises to requesting telecommunications carriers on a first-come,
first-served basis, provided, however, that the incumbent LEC shall not
be required to lease or construct additional space to provide for
physical collocation when existing space has been exhausted;
(2) To the extent possible, an incumbent LEC shall make contiguous
space available to requesting telecommunications carriers that seek to
expand their existing collocation space;
(3) When planning renovations of existing facilities or constructing or
leasing new facilities, an incumbent LEC shall take into account
projected demand for collocation of equipment;
(4) An incumbent LEC may retain a limited amount of floor space for its
own specific future uses, provided, however, that neither the incumbent
LEC nor any of its affiliates may reserve space for future use on terms
more favorable than those that apply to other telecommunications
carriers seeking to reserve collocation space for their own future use;
(5) An incumbent LEC shall relinquish any space held for future use
before denying a request for virtual collocation on the grounds of
space limitations, unless the incumbent LEC proves to the state
commission that virtual collocation at that point is not technically
feasible; and
(6) An incumbent LEC may impose reasonable restrictions on the
warehousing of unused space by collocating telecommunications carriers,
provided, however, that the incumbent LEC shall not set maximum space
limitations applicable to such carriers unless the incumbent LEC proves
to the state commission that space constraints make such restrictions
necessary.
(7) An incumbent LEC must assign collocation space to requesting
carriers in a just, reasonable, and nondiscriminatory manner. An
incumbent LEC must allow each carrier requesting physical collocation
to submit space preferences prior to assigning physical collocation
space to that carrier. At a minimum, an incumbent LEC's space
assignment policies and practices must meet the following principles:
(A) An incumbent LEC's space assignment policies and practices must not
materially increase a requesting carrier's collocation costs.
(B) An incumbent LEC's space assignment policies and practices must not
materially delay a requesting carrier occupation and use of the
incumbent LEC's premises.
(C) An incumbent LEC must not assign physical collocation space that
will impair the quality of service or impose other limitations on the
service a requesting carrier wishes to offer.
(D) An incumbent LEC's space assignment policies and practices must not
reduce unreasonably the total space available for physical collocation
or preclude unreasonably physical collocation within the incumbent's
premises.
(g) An incumbent LEC shall permit collocating telecommunications
carriers to collocate equipment and connect such equipment to unbundled
network transmission elements obtained from the incumbent LEC, and
shall not require such telecommunications carriers to bring their own
transmission facilities to the incumbent LEC's premises in which they
seek to collocate equipment.
(h) As described in paragraphs (1) and (2) of this section, an
incumbent LEC shall permit a collocating telecommunications carrier to
interconnect its network with that of another collocating
telecommunications carrier at the incumbent LEC's premises and to
connect its collocated equipment to the collocated equipment of another
telecommunications carrier within the same premises, provided that the
collocated equipment is also used for interconnection with the
incumbent LEC or for access to the incumbent LEC's unbundled network
elements.
(1) An incumbent LEC shall provide, at the request of a collocating
telecommunications carrier, a connection between the equipment in the
collocated spaces of two or more telecommunications carriers, except to
the extent the incumbent LEC permits the collocating parties to provide
the requested connection for themselves or a connection is not required
under paragraph (h)(2) of this section. Where technically feasible, the
incumbent LEC shall provide the connection using copper, dark fiber,
lit fiber, or other transmission medium, as requested by the
collocating telecommunications carrier.
(2) An incumbent LEC is not required to provide a connection between
the equipment in the collocated spaces of two or more
telecommunications carriers if the connection is requested pursuant to
section 201 of the Act, unless the requesting carrier submits to the
incumbent LEC a certification that more than 10 percent of the amount
of traffic to be transmitted through the connection will be interstate.
The incumbent LEC cannot refuse to accept the certification, but
instead must provision the service promptly. Any incumbent LEC may file
a section 208 complaint with the Commission challenging the
certification if it believes that the certification is deficient. No
such certification is required for a request for such connection under
section 251 of the Act.
(i) As provided herein, an incumbent LEC may require reasonable
security arrangements to protect its equipment and ensure network
reliability. An incumbent LEC may only impose security arrangements
that are as stringent as the security arrangements that the incumbent
LEC maintains at its own premises for its own employees or authorized
contractors. An incumbent LEC must allow collocating parties to access
their collocated equipment 24 hours a day, seven days a week, without
requiring either a security escort of any kind or delaying a
competitor's employees' entry into the incumbent LEC's premises. An
incumbent LEC may require a collocating carrier to pay only for the
least expensive, effective security option that is viable for the
physical collocation space assigned. Reasonable security measures that
the incumbent LEC may adopt include:
(1) Installing security cameras or other monitoring systems; or
(2) Requiring competitive LEC personnel to use badges with computerized
tracking systems; or
(3) Requiring competitive LEC employees to undergo the same level of
security training, or its equivalent, that the incumbent's own
employees, or third party contractors providing similar functions, must
undergo; provided, however, that the incumbent LEC may not require
competitive LEC employees to receive such training from the incumbent
LEC itself, but must provide information to the competitive LEC on the
specific type of training required so the competitive LEC's employees
can conduct their own training.
(4) Restricting physical collocation to space separated from space
housing the incumbent LEC's equipment, provided that each of the
following conditions is met:
(i) Either legitimate security concerns, or operational constraints
unrelated to the incumbent's or any of its affiliates' or subsidiaries
competitive concerns, warrant such separation;
(ii) Any physical collocation space assigned to an affiliate or
subsidiary of the incumbent LEC is separated from space housing the
incumbent LEC's equipment;
(iii) The separated space will be available in the same time frame as,
or a shorter time frame than, non-separated space;
(iv) The cost of the separated space to the requesting carrier will not
be materially higher than the cost of non-separated space; and
(v) The separated space is comparable, from a technical and engineering
standpoint, to non-separated space.
(5) Requiring the employees and contractors of collocating carriers to
use a central or separate entrance to the incumbent's building,
provided, however, that where an incumbent LEC requires that the
employees or contractors of collocating carriers access collocated
equipment only through a separate entrance, employees and contractors
of the incumbent LEC's affiliates and subsidiaries must be subject to
the same restriction.
(6) Constructing or requiring the construction of a separate entrance
to access physical collocation space, provided that each of the
following conditions is met:
(i) Construction of a separate entrance is technically feasible;
(ii) Either legitimate security concerns, or operational constraints
unrelated to the incumbent's or any of its affiliates' or subsidiaries
competitive concerns, warrant such separation;
(iii) Construction of a separate entrance will not artificially delay
collocation provisioning; and
(iv) Construction of a separate entrance will not materially increase
the requesting carrier's costs.
(j) An incumbent LEC shall permit a collocating telecommunications
carrier to subcontract the construction of physical collocation
arrangements with contractors approved by the incumbent LEC, provided,
however, that the incumbent LEC shall not unreasonably withhold
approval of contractors. Approval by an incumbent LEC shall be based on
the same criteria it uses in approving contractors for its own
purposes.
(k) An incumbent LEC's physical collocation offering must include the
following:
(1) Shared collocation cages. A shared collocation cage is a caged
collocation space shared by two or more competitive LECs pursuant to
terms and conditions agreed to by the competitive LECs. In making
shared cage arrangements available, an incumbent LEC may not increase
the cost of site preparation or nonrecurring charges above the cost for
provisioning such a cage of similar dimensions and material to a single
collocating party. In addition, the incumbent must prorate the charge
for site conditioning and preparation undertaken by the incumbent to
construct the shared collocation cage or condition the space for
collocation use, regardless of how many carriers actually collocate in
that cage, by determining the total charge for site preparation and
allocating that charge to a collocating carrier based on the percentage
of the total space utilized by that carrier. An incumbent LEC must make
shared collocation space available in single-bay increments or their
equivalent, i.e., a competing carrier can purchase space in increments
small enough to collocate a single rack, or bay, of equipment.
(2) Cageless collocation. Incumbent LECs must allow competitors to
collocate without requiring the construction of a cage or similar
structure. Incumbent LECs must permit collocating carriers to have
direct access to their equipment. An incumbent LEC may not require
competitors to use an intermediate interconnection arrangement in lieu
of direct connection to the incumbent's network if technically
feasible. An incumbent LEC must make cageless collocation space
available in single-bay increments, meaning that a competing carrier
can purchase space in increments small enough to collocate a single
rack, or bay, of equipment.
(3) Adjacent space collocation. An incumbent LEC must make available,
where physical collocation space is legitimately exhausted in a
particular incumbent LEC structure, collocation in adjacent controlled
environmental vaults, controlled environmental huts, or similar
structures located at the incumbent LEC premises to the extent
technically feasible. The incumbent LEC must permit a requesting
telecommunications carrier to construct or otherwise procure such an
adjacent structure, subject only to reasonable safety and maintenance
requirements. The incumbent must provide power and physical collocation
services and facilities, subject to the same nondiscrimination
requirements as applicable to any other physical collocation
arrangement. The incumbent LEC must permit the requesting carrier to
place its own equipment, including, but not limited to, copper cables,
coaxial cables, fiber cables, and telecommunications equipment, in
adjacent facilities constructed by the incumbent LEC, the requesting
carrier, or a third-party. If physical collocation space becomes
available in a previously exhausted incumbent LEC structure, the
incumbent LEC must not require a carrier to move, or prohibit a
competitive LEC from moving, a collocation arrangement into that
structure. Instead, the incumbent LEC must continue to allow the
carrier to collocate in any adjacent controlled environmental vault,
controlled environmental vault, or similar structure that the carrier
has constructed or otherwise procured.
(l) An incumbent LEC must offer to provide and provide all forms of
physical collocation ( i.e., caged, cageless, shared, and adjacent)
within the following deadlines, except to the extent a state sets its
own deadlines or the incumbent LEC has demonstrated to the state
commission that physical collocation is not practical for technical
reasons or because of space limitations.
(1) Within ten days after receiving an application for physical
collocation, an incumbent LEC must inform the requesting carrier
whether the application meets each of the incumbent LEC's established
collocation standards. A requesting carrier that resubmits a revised
application curing any deficiencies in an application for physical
collocation within ten days after being informed of them retains its
position within any collocation queue that the incumbent LEC maintains
pursuant to paragraph (f)(1) of this section.
(2) Except as stated in paragraphs (l)(3) and (l)(4) of this section,
an incumbent LEC must complete provisioning of a requested physical
collocation arrangement within 90 days after receiving an application
that meets the incumbent LEC's established collocation application
standards.
(3) An incumbent LEC need not meet the deadline set forth in paragraph
(l)(2) of this section if, after receipt of any price quotation
provided by the incumbent LEC, the telecommunications carrier
requesting collocation does not notify the incumbent LEC that physical
collocation should proceed.
(4) If, within seven days of the requesting carrier's receipt of any
price quotation provided by the incumbent LEC, the telecommunications
carrier requesting collocation does not notify the incumbent LEC that
physical collocation should proceed, then the incumbent LEC need not
complete provisioning of a requested physical collocation arrangement
until 90 days after receiving such notification from the requesting
telecommunications carrier.
[ 61 FR 45619 , Aug. 28, 1996, as amended at 64 FR 23242 , Apr. 30, 1999;
65 FR 54439 , Sept. 8, 2000; 66 FR 43521 , Aug. 20, 2001]
return arrow Back to Top
Goto Section: 51.321 | 51.325
Goto Year: 2011 |
2013
CiteFind - See documents on FCC website that
cite this rule
Want to support this service?
Thanks!
Report errors in
this rule. Since these rules are converted to HTML by machine, it's possible errors have been made. Please
help us improve these rules by clicking the Report FCC Rule Errors link to report an error.
hallikainen.com
Helping make public information public