Goto Section: 76.1904 | 76.1906 | Table of Contents

FCC 76.1905
Revised as of October 1, 2007
Goto Year:2006 | 2008
Sec.  76.1905   Petitions to modify encoding rules for new services within defined
business models.

   (a) The encoding rules for defined business models in  Sec. 76.1904 reflect the
   conventional  methods  for packaging programs in the MVPD market as of
   December 31, 2002, and are presumed to be the appropriate rules for defined
   business models. A covered entity may petition the Commission for approval
   to allow within a defined business model, other than unencrypted broadcast
   television, the encoding of a new service in a manner different from the
   encoding rules set forth in  Sec. 76.1904(b)(1) and (2). No such petition will be
   approved under the public interest test set forth in paragraph (c)(4) of
   this section unless the new service differs from existing services provided
   by any covered entity under the applicable defined business model prior to
   December 31, 2002.

   (b) Petitions. A petition to encode a new service within a defined business
   model  other  than  as  permitted  by  the encoding rules set forth in
    Sec. 76.1904(b)(1) and (2) shall describe:

   (1) The defined business model, the new service, and the proposed encoding
   terms, including the use of copy never and copy one generation encoding, and
   the encoding of content with respect to “pause” set forth in  Sec. 76.1904(b)(2).

   (2) Whether the claimed benefit to consumers of the new service, including,
   but not limited to, the availability of content in earlier release windows,
   more favorable terms, innovation or original programming, outweighs the
   limitation on the consumers' control over the new service;

   (3) The ways in which the new service differs from existing services offered
   by any covered entity within the applicable defined business model prior to
   December 31, 2002;

   (4) All other pertinent facts and considerations relied on to support a
   determination that grant of the petition would serve the public interest.

   (5) Factual allegations shall be supported by affidavit or declaration of a
   person or persons with actual knowledge of the facts, and exhibits shall be
   verified by the person who prepares them.

   (c) Petition process —(1) Public notice. The Commission shall give public
   notice of any such petition.

   (2) Comments. Interested persons may submit comments or oppositions to the
   petition within thirty (30) days after the date of public notice of the
   filing of such petition. Comments or oppositions shall be served on the
   petitioner and on all persons listed in petitioner's certificate of service,
   and shall contain a detailed full statement of any facts or considerations
   relied  on.  Factual  allegations  shall  be supported by affidavit or
   declaration of a person or persons with actual knowledge of the facts, and
   exhibits shall be verified by the person who prepares them.

   (3) Replies. The petitioner may file a reply to the comments or oppositions
   within ten (10) days after their submission, which shall be served on all
   persons who have filed pleadings and shall also contain a detailed full
   showing, supported by affidavit or declaration, of any additional facts or
   considerations relied on. There shall be no further pleadings filed after
   petitioner's reply, unless authorized by the Commission.

   (4) Commission determination as to encoding rules for a new service within a
   defined business model. (i) Proceedings initiated by petitions pursuant to
   this section shall be permit-but-disclose proceedings, unless otherwise
   specified by the Commission. The covered entity shall have the burden of
   proof to establish that the proposed change in encoding rules for a new
   service  is  in  the public interest. In making its determination, the
   Commission shall take into account the following factors:

   (A) Whether the benefit to consumers of the new service, including but not
   limited to earlier release windows, more favorable terms, innovation or
   original programming, outweighs the limitation on the consumers' control
   over the new service;

   (B) Ways in which the new service differs from existing services offered by
   any covered entity within the applicable defined business model prior to
   December 31, 2002; and

   (ii) The Commission may specify other procedures, such as oral argument,
   evidentiary hearing, or further written submissions directed to particular
   aspects, as it deems appropriate.

   (iii) A petition may, upon request of the petitioner, be dismissed without
   prejudice as a matter of right prior to the adoption date of any final
   action taken by the Commission with respect to the petition. A petitioner's
   request for the return of a petition will be regarded as a request for
   dismissal.

   (d)  Complaint  regarding a new service not subject to petition. In an
   instance in which an interested party has a substantial basis to believe and
   does believe in good faith that a new service within a defined business
   model has been launched without a petition as required by this section, such
   party may file a complaint pursuant to  Sec. 76.7.


Goto Section: 76.1904 | 76.1906

Goto Year: 2006 | 2008
CiteFind - See documents on FCC website that cite this rule

Want to support this service?
Thanks!

Report errors in this rule. Since these rules are converted to HTML by machine, it's possible errors have been made. Please help us improve these rules by clicking the Report FCC Rule Errors link to report an error.
hallikainen.com
Helping make public information public